Loading...
SDR1997-00017 SDR97 - 00017 CHILDREN ' S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER i "NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION" SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW t S OR] 97-0017/S � ill MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 97-0019 CITY Community�G sp ent CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Shaping ABetter Community This decision was amended to correct factual errors and to further specify reasons for certain improvement requirements,however,there was no change to the conditions of approval. SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel refered to as Parcel 1 on proposed partition site plan. APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: The majority of the subject Parcel is zoned General Commercial; C-G. Approximately 30 feet of the western most portion of proposed Parcel 2 is zoned Low Density Residential; R-3.5. ZONING DESIGNATION: The majority of the parcel is zoned General Commercial; C-G. Approximately 30 feet of the western most portion of proposed Parcel 2 is zoned Low Density Residential; R-3.5. LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 1 OF'9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVA. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Submit a revised landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division that shows the location of the parking lots trees to be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). 2. Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, planting, fences, or temporary or permanent obstructions between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the proposed landscaping meets the standards of the code. 3. Provide written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. The location of the dumpster opening must be relocated to make it more accessible to garbage haulers. 4. Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces provided so that staff can confirm that the required parking spaces have been provided. 5. Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. 6. Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. 7. Submit the Final Plat Application for the Partition. Final Plat Submission Requirements are as follows: A. Submit for City review, three (3) paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative; B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County and by the City of Tigard; and C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two (2) mylar copies of the partition plat for the City Engineer's signature. 8. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for proposed Parcel 1 , the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 9. Obtain a public improvement permit and compliance agreement for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at Tigard City Hall. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 19 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, provide the Engineering Department with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 11 . Provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to proposed Parcel 1. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb or curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; driveway apron; and J. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 13. Provide a profile of SW Park Street, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 14. Construct the driveway for the daycare facility on proposed Parcel 1 where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 01700 on the north side of SW Park Street. 15. Submit a revised parking lot plan in relation to the re-located drive. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division. 16. Apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 17. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. 18. Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 19 19. Complete the required public improvements, obtain cot Tuitional acceptance from the City, and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 20. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 21. Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $9,075. 22. Construct all site improvements as per the approved site plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: While no applications for development of this site have been filed, a site development review on an adjacent parcel (SDR 93-0012/MIS 93-0006) imposed conditions which had a potential for impact on this site. SDR 93-0012/MIS 93-0006 was for the construction of a Taco Bell with a shared access connection with the driveway to the east of the site (Hot `n' Now). The Hot `n' Now site is directly to the east of the subject property. The original approval was appealed. Among other issues, there were requests from the neighbors that the Hot `n' Now developer be required to dedicate an easement for the future use of tax lot 01805, which is the subject parcel. In the Planning Commission Final Order No. 93-15 PC (pages 13-14) the issue of this easement is discussed. It was determined that, while providing for an easement may be desirable, "it is not known what development may be proposed on the Harris property or what the future change in the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning designation may be (or whether it will even occur). Therefore, requiring Hot Now to construct a driveway stubout to the Harris property (existing daycare site) is unnecessary and premature at this time." The Final Order goes on to state that the Hot `n' Now should provide for an easement but "whether or not this easement would be utilized would be decided at the time of the review of the development proposal for the Harris property." As will be discussed in greater detail further in this decision, staff has taken this easement into consideration and determined that it is not in the best interest of public safety to require this existing easement to be utilized. Discussions with ODOT specifically regarding the use of this easement indicate that they are opposed to further utilizing the existing Hot 'n' Now driveway as it is very close to the intersection of Highway 99W. In addition, the awkward turning movements required for the right-in/right-out driveway would require people who live down SW Park Street and who would utilize the daycare to travel out onto Highway 99W and around the block in order to pick-up and drop-off their children. This would result in more traffic on an already busy highway and the increased frustration could result in people ignoring the traffic signs, which would cause a much more dangerous situation than having a driveway further west on SW NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 19 Park Street. While the condition required by the Planning Commission Final Order No. 93-15 PC imposed an easement to the subject site, it did not require the authority to actually construct a linking driveway without permission of the Hot `n' Now property. The SDR for the construction of the Hot 'n' Now (SDR 92-0018/MIS 92-0016) also allowed for a lot line adjustment between the subject site and the Hot 'n' Now property to the east. The original approval for this proposal was appealed, however the appeal issue was related to the right-in/right-out driveway and had nothing to do with the lot line adjustment or tax lot 01805 itself. In reviewing this file, staff discovered that prior to the Hot `n' Now, there was a fuel station on the site. As part of cleaning up this fuel station site, some soil was placed on the subject property for aeration. The City understands DEQ issued a "letter of no further action" for this site, however, if contaminants are uncovered during development of the property, DEQ should be notified. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue. The site is identified as WCTM 2S103CB, Tax Lot 01805. The site is bordered to the south and west by property zoned General Commercial (C-G). The property to the east is zoned R-3.5 and the property to the north, across SW Park Street, is zoned R-4.5. The properties on all sides are developed consistent with their zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is relatively flat, with no significant vegetation other than grasses. The site is currently vacant. The proposal is to partition the lot into two (2) parcels. The eastern most parcel (Parcel 1) will be 27,936 square feet and will be developed with a 6,500 square foot daycare center facility. The western most parcel (Parcel 2) will be 14,567 square feet and is not proposed to be developed at this time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements on SW Park Street. The Engineering Department has estimated the cost of the half-street improvements to be approximately $200 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 19 current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost of $200 per lineal soot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half-street improvements along the portion of the parcel to be developed with a daycare facility on SW Park Street is $65,916 (329.58 feet x $200). The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $23,862. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $74,568 ($23,862 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $23,862, the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $50,706 impact on the collector and arterial systems. The rough proportionality test means that the conditions imposed must be "roughly proportional" to the impacts associated with a development. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs (in this case, the street improvements) required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. Further more, Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. In order for the street system to function to serve all properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. Although the requirements imposed have a slightly higher estimated value than the unmitigated impact, the City finds that the conditions meet the rough proportionality test. There is unmeasured impacts on nearby local streets which adds to the unmitigated cost. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR LAND PARTITIONS: Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that the newly created lot will continue to allow for commercial development. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and by the application and review process. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 19 Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Adequate public facilities are, or will be conditioned to be, available to serve the proposal and will be constructed to meet City standards. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and The proposal complies, or will be conditioned to comply, with the lot size and dimensional requirements. This is discussed in detail in SPECIAL PROVISIONS, pages 6 and 7 All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52). The public facilities and proposed improvements are, or will be conditioned to be, in compliance with City standards. The actual improvement requirements for each proposed parcel is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Staff finds that the criteria above have been met outright or will be met as a result of conditions imposed in this decision in further sections. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 18.162.050 contains the following special provisions for lots created through the Partition Process: Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The average minimum lot width for the C-G zone is 50 feet. The plan submitted shows proposed Parcel 1 with a width of approximately 158 feet and proposed Parcel 2 with an average width of approximately 303 feet, thus meeting the criteria. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There is no minimum lot area requirement in the C-G zone, therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right- of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. Both parcels have adequate access and frontage on SW Park street, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both proposed lots are currently vacant. The daycare on proposed Parcel 1 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks further in this decision. Any structures placed on proposed Parcel 2 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks at the time of Site Development Review. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 19 Front Yard Determination for Flaq Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Screening on Flaq Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. Both parcels have direct access to SW Park Street, a public street. There is a fire hydrant at the corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street and another one at the corner of SW Park Street and SW Watkins Avenue. Both existing fire hydrants are within close proximity to the site, however, due to the large frontage of the site (approximately 488 feet), an additional fire hydrant may be required. Fire protection requirements for the daycare are discussed further in this decision under the Building Divisions comments. Fire protection for proposed Parcel 2 will be reviewed at time of Site Development Review. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The partition does not require the use or creation of a common drive, therefore, this standard does not apply. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 18.108.040 requires that all vehicular access and egress connect directly with a public or private street and the vehicular access be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances for commercial uses. Access for proposed Parcel 1 will be addressed further in this decision under the SDR standards. Access for proposed Parcel 2 will be addressed at time of Site Development Review for proposed construction on that lot. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This site is not within a 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 19 FINDING: Based on the analysis detailed in the criteria above, staff finds that the Special Provisions for lots created through the partition process have been satisfied. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying a Site Development Review application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The existing lot is adjacent to residentially zoned and developed property to the west and to the north, across SW Park Street. After the partition, however, the proposed daycare will be adjacent to the newly created lot, thus, no buffering and screening is required between the property to the west and the daycare. When proposed Parcel 2 is developed, buffering on that lot will be necessary. Because the property to the north across the street from the proposed development is residentially zoned property, buffering shall be required. The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) says that when uses would be adjacent to one another, except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening shall be required. The buffer matrix requires a 20-foot-wide buffer between commercial and single-family residential uses. The plan submitted shows there will be 20 feet from the property line to the beginning of any portion of the structure. The buffer will be occupied by landscaping, fencing and bark chips. The landscaping proposed meets the quantity standards specified in Section 18.100.080.D.2 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The landscape plan submitted indicates the parking lot will be separated from SW Park Street by a five (5)-foot-wide landscape strip planted with Otto Luyken Laurel, Crimson Pygmy Barberry and 4 Norwegian Maple trees. Based on information provided in the Western Garden Book, the parking lot will be effectively screened. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 19 shrubbery and trees. frees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As discussed above, the parking lot will be effectively screened. The landscape plan shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for approximately every seven (7) spaces in all areas except the center parking area. An additional tree is necessary in this area to comply with the standards. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has frontage on SW Park Street. The landscape plan indicates a total of nine (9) Norwegian Sunset Maples will be planted along the street approximately 30 feet apart, therefore, this criterion has been met. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The plans submitted indicate that 44% of the site will be landscaped, thus meeting the standard. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not provide for one (1) parking lot tree for every seven (7) parking spaces as discussed above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows a parking lot tree will be planted in the center parking area, this criteria will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan shows that the proposed sign location, a portion of a parking space and landscaping will be within the vision clearance triangle area. While landscaping may be permitted in this area, the applicant must provide verification that the proposed landscaping will meet the vision clearance requirements of clearance between three (3) feet and eight (8) NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 19 feet in height. The parking lot location and sign will need to be relocated so that they are not within the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because the site plan shows prohibited objects in the vision clearance triangle, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows no objects will be located between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height in the vision clearance area, these standards can be met CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, plantings, fences, or temporary or permanent obstruction between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the landscaping proposed meets the standards. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(B)(3) requires five (5) parking spaces plus one (1) space per classroom for daycare facilities. The site plan does not clearly indicate the number of classrooms, however, staff counted approximately 12 areas that could be used as class space, not including the pool area. Based on this estimation, 17 parking spaces are required. The plan provides for a total of 23 parking spaces. It appears that this standard has been met, however, prior to final site plan approval, the applicant must verify the number of classroom spaces in order to insure the required parking has been provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan and will not be located in any parking aisles, pedestrian ways or landscape areas, thus meeting this criteria. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the proposed structure does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standard does not apply. FINDING: The plan appears to provide for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces and off-street loading. Because the applicant did not indicate the number of classrooms proposed, and the parking requirement is based upon the number of classrooms, staff can not verify that this criterion has been satisfied. If the applicant indicates the number of classrooms provided will be 18 or less, the number of parking spaces proposed will meet the criteria. CONDITION: Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces that will be provided. NOTE: The parking layout may change based on the requirements to re-locate the proposed driveway (discussed further in this decision). If this layout changes, NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 19 staff will need to review the proposed layout to Insure that it conforms to the TMC standards. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. 18.108.105 requires walkways between ground floor entrances to the streets which provide required access. There is one (1), 24-foot-wide access proposed. Staff has concerns, however, that the location of the driveway is too close to the existing intersection of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street. This is discussed in more detail in the Street and Utility Improvement Standards Section of this decision. A walkway is proposed between the building and SW Park Street, thus, meeting the standards. FINDING: Because the access width proposed meets the standards and because the location will be discussed and conditioned further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. The site plan shows the location of a proposed sign, however, the approval of the sign and location is through a separate sign permit process administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no existing trees on the parcel where the daycare is proposed. Therefore, no trees will be removed as a result of this development. FINDING: Because there are no trees on the parcel being reviewed for development approval, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of the intersection of SW Grant Street. Southwest Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on SW Park Street in this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 19 The roadway is paved, but not fully improved adjacent to this site. The roadway was improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of this site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the traffic impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of the daycare facility project on proposed Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of the half-street improvements adjacent to proposed Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur that improvements adjacent to proposed Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of proposed Parcel 2 is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City would be necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the daycare facility on Proposed Parcel 1 . Staff is concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is very close (within 35 feet) to the intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempts to avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on opposite sides of the street. In addition, the parcel just east of this site (Hot `n Now) was conditioned as a part of SDR 93-0012 to provide an access easement to this parcel. The Hot `n Now site currently has a driveway that aligns with SW Grant Street; this driveway is restricted to encourage traffic to turn right out of the site. A "Right-Turn Only" sign is present, along with a small concrete island. It should be noted that the City did not require Hot `n Now to physically construct a driveway connection to this site; only an easement was required to allow for the possibility of a shared access. Staff considered the possibility of requiring the applicant to redesign the site plan to utilize the Hot `n Now driveway. However, both City staff and ODOT staff have a concern with the close proximity of the Hot `n Now driveway to the signalized intersection at SW Pacific Highway. Southwest Pacific Highway is a very congested arterial roadway and the stacking of vehicles that occurs during peak hours at the intersection will make the Hot `n Now driveway very difficult, and potentially unsafe to use, particularly if vehicles are attempting a left turn from SW Park Street into the driveway. The combination of stacking cars on SW Park Street with vehicles desiring to turn left into the site will create more congestion at the signalized intersection. ODOT recommended that the driveway to this site be moved further to the west to provide additional separation from the SW Pacific Highway signal. City staff agrees. There is an existing gravel driveway for this site further west from the proposed driveway location that currently lines up well with an existing driveway serving Tax Lot 01700 on the north side of SW Park Street. The existing gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the SW Grant Street intersection and would be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts with the intersection of SW Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of SW Park Street. In addition, the separation from the SW Pacific Highway signalized intersection will be increased to 300 feet, which will satisfy ODOT and City concerns. This location would not conflict with the building location, but may necessitate a redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign, the alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant be required to locate the driveway for the daycare center at the existing gravel driveway location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 01700. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 19 Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing eight (8)-inch public water line located adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street. The applicant will need to apply for water service from the City. The Public Works Department will install the necessary water service(s). Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of proposed Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on- site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in SW Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in- lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 19 foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site (adjacent to proposed Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on proposed Parcel 1 would be $9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of proposed Parcel 2. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan as submitted does not fully meet the Street and Utility Improvement standards. If the applicant revises the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary improvements in compliance with Conditions of Approval 7-21 outlined in pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will be satisfied. CONDITION:Comply with Conditions of Approval 7-21 as outlined on pages 2-4 of this decision. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 1 , 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180 (Public Transit) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this Section: 18.120.180.11 (Access ar.d Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.130.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (C ainage), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans submitted show a six (6)-foot high wood dumpster enclosure will be provided towards the rear of the site. In order to meet the standards for collection of mixed solid waste and recyclables as discussed above, the applicant must provide verification from the franchise hauler that their disposal plan complies. The dumpster opening is not easily accessible for loading disposal vehicles and will likely be of concern to the hauler. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the proposed dumpster location and collection facility, this criterion will be met. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 19 CONDITION Submit a written sign-off from the hauler that states the proposed trash enclosure will meet the standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no existing trees on the daycare site. The proposed building location will not significantly affect existing topography and natural drainage. Drainage requirements due to this development were discussed in detail on page 13 of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed building was planned with consideration of the natural and physical environment and will not significantly affect topography or natural drainage, this standard has been satisfied. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. There will be play areas between the street and the structure which could result in an increase in noise for the residential uses across the street. As required earlier in this decision, buffering will be provided using shrubs, trees and fencing, thus satisfying this criteria. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and indicated that a lighting plan is needed for review. They further commented that for crime deterrent purposes, the parking area should have some surveillance capability from traveling public on SW Park Street. While this may seem to contradict the parking lot screening standards, it in fact, does not. The parking lot screening is intended to be more of a visual buffer that a full sight obscuring screen. It is assumed, therefore, that the parking lot will still be visible for surveillance purposes. FINDING: Because a lighting plan was not provided, the Tigard Police Crime Prevention Officer was unable to comment on the effectiveness of lighting area vulnerable to crime. In order to satisfy this standard, submit a proposed lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.120.16 states that all facilities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS 487. Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1-25 parking spaces are provided. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 16 OF 19 The proposal shows 2 handicapped access spaces with a shared van accessible aisle. The plan shows the access ramp is in the aisle. Building Division Staff who enforce ADA requirements through the building plans review process have stated that this ramp must be outside of the access aisle (on the sidewalk). FINDING: Because the access aisle as shown does not meet the ADA requirements, this standards has not been met. If the applicant submits revised plans that show the access ramp is not located within the aisle, this standard will be satisfied. CONDITION: Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as Children's Daycare. Code Section 18.62.030 lists Children's Daycare as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Criteria: Section 18.62 states that the required setbacks in the C-G zone are: 0-foot front yard (although there are buffer requirements for this site), 0 foot rear yard, except where abutting residential and 0 foot side yard, except where abutting residential. The proposed daycare site does not abut residential property except to the north, therefore, the building location meets the dimensional standards of the Code. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed and a hydrant flow test must be completed. The covered porch is considered part of the building square footage for Uniform Building Code (UBC) purposes, therefore, if it is between 20 feet and 10 feet of the parking lot, it must be one hour fire resistant construction. If the porch is less than 10 feet from the property line, it can not have unprotected openings. This would not be permitted because it would violate buffer requirements. The Building Division also reviews applications for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. In regard to compliance with these standards, it appears that there are some minor revisions that will be necessary prior to obtaining building permits. These changes include: providing access through the chain link fence along SW Park Street for fire personnel and revising the fence location in the rear of the site to provide enough room for fire fighting personnel to maneuver. These requirements are mentioned in order to assist the applicant in submittal of the building plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this approval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. Additional Building Division comments which resulted in a condition of approval have been incorporated into the body of this decision. Please refer questions regarding the comments from the Building Division to Jim Funk, Commercial Building Plans Examiner. The City of Tigard Police Department has offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 17 OF 19 The City of Tigard Gvarations Manager has reviewed .,.e proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a 1" water meter is required along with a minimum of a double check valve device assembly (backflow prevention device). They have also indicated that all portions of the proposed building must be within 250 feet of a fire hydrant as measured through accessible driving surfaces. This will be reviewed at time of building permits and additional fire hydrant will be required if necessary. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and proved comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), PGE, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and offered no comments or objections. ODOT was notified of the proposal and provided comments which have been incorporated into this decision. GTE was notified and indicated that the developer/owner must place conduits to GTE specifications. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY MARCH 16, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 18 OF 19 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MARCH 16, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Commur Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon (503) 639-4171 . 4 - /....1//4, � March 6, 1998 PREPARE Y: Julia Hajduk / DATE Associate P nner ,/17...._...-------- -----7 ---- Cam__ March 6, 1998 � APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\Julia\sdr\daycare.doc NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 19 C . • 1 l\ 1�, Z O O . _ _ _ FS.W.PARK STREET 4 • -------- --- - _— _ _--_— Z i y J Z f a was . - MI .45 4414W PARCEL 2 Q" i 19rie61 PARCEL 1 Sr AREA=14567 SQ.FT. AREA=27,936 S0.FT 1 ry fl 1 PLAY LL AREA 0 I 7 Q■— 0 / / v-pc,› O- j -. i • i ni� zV"•M O• :� +pi �•� � V.' imml 0 PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE: 6,500 SQ. a CASE NOES] &CASE NAMEISk p ; 1 I SITE PLAN SIB 97-0017 l MtP 97-0019 EXHIBIT MAP N CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE { 1E NT Tf SCALD I 111 ■ -4``- , _''_ . TY of TIARD IJ/ . OEOON� C IMi ON YI1iION!Yl TEY'��.� ♦ . � � , PLANNING DIVISION :�- 401 ,4 .? VICINITY MAP ''�`�` illt ♦ ♦ GDR 91-0011 "` ,a� Ifilk ` * .■, 1 MLP 91-0019 �� ■ '""m►� CNILDRENES VILLAGE W. . 40\A- lop - MOW ■41/* DAY CARE CENTER ■■■■■ �0-- Nor! LL ` ,•e: n 1P111 .. . . ■ 1 ■■■■ l 1 s 0_, ! trAimaiia vw **- * 9 4o # * Ai ■ riI * ■ +w 0 200 400 000 Fat ' . 1, ,ti.63bt ■ 111111111111N �i! ►I mei ■ • . A ii■mm i■i■ 1111111110 ♦ ` ,l City of Tigard 1111111111 I-______ I_ ST mtonrr0on an OAs msp b t«g.n.d lore ion ocd and _- `' �.'' ■ . should 6a valbd wM tM DsYalopmw.Samoa!Dh bbn ■■■ ■� ■ ■ 13lar,O Ptah22Nd"-� 11111 • TiOald,OR 07223■.••■1-i- �_ •■_.■■ _..__• "'EEL ht�J/www.d.tgaM.or.w Community Development Plot date:Jan 14, 1998;a\maglclmagicdd.apr NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR] 97-0011/ iv MINOR LAND PARTITION [MLP) 97-0019 ' Aomunity Devepment CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER shapilgA Better Community SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain SDR approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel (Parcel 1 on proposed partition). APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1 . Submit a revised landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division that shows the location of the parking lots trees to be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). 2. Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, planting, fences, or temporary or permanent obstructions between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the proposed landscaping meets the standards of the code. 3. Provide written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. The location of the dumpster opening must be relocated to make it more accessible to garbage haulers. 4. Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces provided so that staff can • confirm that the required parking spaces have been provided. 5. Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. 6. Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. 7. Submit the Final Plat Application for the Partition. Final Plat Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review, three (3) paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County and by the City of Tigard. C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two (2) mylar copies of the partition plat for the City Engineer's signature. 8. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 9. Obtain a public improvement permit and compliance agreement for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at Tigard City Hall. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 18 L 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, provide the Engineering Department with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 11 . Provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to Parcel 1. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb or curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; driveway apron; and J. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 13. Provide a profile of SW Park Street, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 14. Construct the driveway for the daycare facility on Parcel 1 where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of SW Park Street. 15. Submit a revised parking lot plan in relation to the re-located drive. Staff contact Julia Hajduk, Planning Division. 16. Apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 17. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. 18. Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED �11�A9+ *Ncr. PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 18 19. Complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 20. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 21 . Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $9,075. 22. Construct all site improvements as per the approved site plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: No development applications related to this tax lot were found to have been previously filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located on SW Park Street between Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue. The site is identified as WCTM 2S103CB, Tax Lot 01805. The site is bordered to the south and west by property zoned General Commercial (C-G). The property to the east is zoned R-3.5 and the property to the north, across SW Park Street, is zoned R-4.5. The properties on all sides are developed consistent with their zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is relatively flat, with no significant vegetation other than grasses. The site is currently vacant. The proposal is to partition the lot into two (2) parcels. The eastern most parcel (Parcel 1) will be 27,936 square feet and will be developed with a 6,500 square foot daycare center facility. The western most parcel (Parcel 2) will be 14,567 square feet and is not proposed to be developed at this time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 18 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of • real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements on SW Park Street. The Engineering Department has estimated the cost of the half-street improvements to be approximately $200 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost of $200 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half-street improvements along the portion of the parcel to be developed with a daycare facility on SW Park Street is $65,916 (329.58 feet x $200). The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $23,862. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $74,568 ($23,862 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $23,862, the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $50,706 impact on the collector and arterial systems. The rough proportionality test means that the conditions imposed must be "roughly proportional" to the impacts associated with a development. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs (in this case, the street improvements) required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. Further more, Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. In order for the street system to function to serve all properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. Although the requirements imposed have a slightly higher estimated value Iran me unmitigated impact, the 6Ity was that me conaiuons meet the rougn proportionality test. There is unmeasured impacts on nearby local streets which adds to the unmitigated cost. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR LAND PARTITIONS: Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 18 The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that the newly created lot will continue to allow for commercial development. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and by the application and review process. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Adequate public facilities are, or will be conditioned to be, available to serve the proposal and will be constructed to meet City standards. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and The proposal complies, or will be conditioned to comply, with the lot size and dimensional requirements. This is discussed in detail in SPECIAL PROVISIONS, pages 6 and 7 All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52). The public facilities and proposed improvements are, or will be conditioned to be, in compliance with City standards. The actual improvement requirements for each proposed parcel is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Staff finds that the criteria above have been met outright or will be met as a result of conditions imposed in this decision in further sections. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 18.162.050 contains the following special provisions for lots created through the Partition Process: Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The average minimum lot width for the C-G zone is 50 feet. The plan submitted shows Parcel 1 with a width of approximately 158 feet and Parcel 2 with an average width of approximately 303 feet. thus meeting the criteria. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There is no minimum lot area requirement in the C-G zone, therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCAF.E CENTER PAGE 6 OF 18 Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right- of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. Both parcels have adequate access and frontage on SW Park street, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both proposed lots are currently vacant. The daycare on Parcel 1 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks further in this decision. Any structures placed on Parcel 2 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks at the time of Site Development Review. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. Both parcels have direct access to SW Park Street, a public street. There is a fire hydrant at the corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street and another one at the corner of SW Park Street and SW Watkins Avenue. Both existing fire hydrants are within close proximity to the site, however, due to the large frontage of the site (approximately 488 feet), an additional fire hydrant may be required. Fire protection requirements for the daycare are discussed further in this decision under the Building Divisions comments. Fire protection for Parcel 2 will be reviewed at time of Site Development Review. °ecioroeal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve mere then one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The partition does not require the use or creation of a common drive, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 18 Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 18.108.040 requires that all vehicular access and egress connect directly with a public or private street and the vehicular access be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances for commercial uses. Access for Parcel 1 will be addressed further in this decision under the SDR standards. Access for Parcel 2 will be addressed at time of Site Development Review for proposed construction on that lot. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This site is not within a 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis detailed in the criteria above, staff finds that the Special Provisions for lots created through the partition process have been satisfied. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying a Site Development Review application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The existing lot is adjacent to residentially zoned and developed property to the west and to the north, across SW Park Street. After the partition, however, the proposed daycare will be adjacent to the newly created lot, thus, no buffering and screening is required between the property to the west and the daycare. When Parcel 2 is developed, buffering on that lot will be necessary. Because the property to the north across the street from the proposed development is residentially zoned property, buffering shall be required. The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) says that when uses would be adjacent to one another, except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening shall be required. The buffer matrix requires a 20-foot-wide buffer between commercial and single-family residential uses. The plan submitted shows there will be 20 feet from the property line to the beginning of any NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 18 portion of the structure. The buffer will be occupied by landscaping, fencing and bark chips. • The landscaping proposed meets the quantity standards specified in Section 18.100.080.D.2 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The landscape plan submitted indicates the parking lot will be separated from SW Park Street by a five (5)-foot-wide landscape strip planted with Otto Luyken Laurel, Crimson Pygmy Barberry and 4 Norwegian Maple trees. Based on information provided in the Western Garden Book, the parking lot will be effectively screened. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As discussed above, the parking lot will be effectively screened. The landscape plan shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for approximately every seven (7) spaces in all areas except the center parking area. An additional tree is necessary in this area to comply with the standards. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has frontage on SW Park Street. The landscape plan indicates a total of nine (9) Norwegian Sunset Maples will be planted along the street approximately 30 feet apart, therefore, this criterion has been met. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The plans submitted indicate that 44% of the site will be landscaped, thus meeting the standard. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not provide for one (1) parking lot tree for every seven (7) parking spaces as discussed above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows a parking lot tree will be planted in the center parking area, this criteria will be met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 18 CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan shows that the proposed sign location, a portion of a parking space and landscaping will be within the vision clearance triangle area. While landscaping may be permitted in this area, the applicant must provide verification that the proposed landscaping will meet the vision clearance requirements of clearance between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. The parking lot location and sign will need to be relocated so that they are not within the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because the site plan shows prohibited objects in the vision clearance triangle, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows no objects will be located between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height in the vision clearance area, these standards can be met CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, plantings, fences, or temporary or permanent obstruction between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the landscaping proposed meets the standards. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(B)(3) requires five (5) parking spaces plus one (1) space per classroom for daycare facilities. The site plan does not clearly indicate the number of classrooms, however, staff counted approximately 12 areas that could be used as class space, not including the pool area. Based on this estimation, 17 parking spaces are required. The plan provides for a total of 23 parking spaces. It appears that this standard has been met, however, prior to final site clan aooroval. the applicant must verify the number of classroom spaces in order to insure the required parking nas been provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan and will not be located in any parking aisles, pedestrian ways or landscape areas, thus meeting this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 18 . Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the proposed structure does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standard does not apply. FINDING: The plan appears to provide for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces and off-street loading. Because the applicant did not indicate the number of classrooms proposed, and the parking requirement is based upon the number of classrooms, staff can not verify that this criterion has been satisfied. If the applicant indicates the number of classrooms provided will be 18 or less, the number of parking spaces proposed will meet the criteria. CONDITION: Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces that will be provided. NOTE: The parking layout may change based on the requirements to re-locate the proposed driveway (discussed further in this decision). If this layout changes, staff will need to review the proposed layout to insure that it conforms to the TMC standards. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. 18.108.105 requires walkways between ground floor entrances to the streets which provide required access. There is one (1), 24-foot-wide access proposed. Staff has concerns, however, that the location of the driveway is too close to the existing intersection of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street. This is discussed in more detail in the Street and Utility Improvement Standards Section of this decision. A walkway is proposed between the building and Park Street, thus, meeting the standards. FINDING: Because the access width proposed meets the standards and because the location will be discussed and conditioned further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. The site plan shows the location of a proposed sign. however. the approval of the sign and location is through a separate sign permit process aaministerea oy the City of Tlgara Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 18 removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection progr defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect tr. during and after construction. There are no existing trees on the parcel proposed for the daycare, therefore, no trees be removed as a result of this development. FINDING: Because there are no trees on the parcel being reviewed for developer approval, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of intersection of Grant Street. Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of- (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on Park Stree this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. The roadway is paved, but not fully improved adjacent to this site. The roadway improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the tr impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of daycare facility project on Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of half-street improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of Parc is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City woulc necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the daycare facility on Parcel 1. Sta concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is very close (within 35 feet) to intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempt avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on oppc sides of the street. There is an existing gravel driveway for this site further west from proposed driveway location. The existing gravel driveway currently lines up well wit existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. The exiE gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the Grant Street intersection and w, be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts the intersection of Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of F Street. This location would not conflict with the building location, but would necessita redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign. alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the apps; be required to locate the driveway for the daycare center at the existing gravel drive location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700. Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing 8-inch pt. water line located adjacent to the south edge of Park Street. The applicant will nee apply for water service from the City and the Public Works department will install necessary water service(s). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 12 • Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on- site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in- lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site (adjacent to Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on Parcel 1 would be $9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of Parcel 2. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 18 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan as submitted does not fully meet the Street and Utility Improvement standards. If the applicant revises the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary improvements in compliance with Conditions of Approval 7-21 outlined in pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will be satisfied. CONDITION:Comply with Conditions of Approval 7-21 as outlined on pages 2-4 of this decision. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 1, 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180 (Public Transit) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this Section: 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (Drainage), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans submitted show a six (6)-foot high wood dumpster enclosure will be provided towards the rear of the site. In order to meet the standards for collection of mixed solid waste and recyclables as discussed above, the applicant must provide verification from the franchise hauler that their disposal plan complies. The dumpster opening is not easily accessible for loading disposal vehicles and will likely be of concern to the hauler. FINDING: because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance witn the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the proposed dumpster location and collection facility, this criterion will be met. CONDITION Submit a written sign-off from the hauler that states the proposed trash enclosure will meet the standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 18 J Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no existing trees on the daycare site. The proposed building location will not significantly affect existing topography and natural drainage. Drainage requirements due to this development were discussed in detail on page 13 of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed building was planned with consideration of the natural and physical environment and will not significantly affect topography or natural drainage, this standard has been satisfied. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. There will be play areas between the street and the structure which could result in an increase in noise for the residential uses across the street. As required earlier in this decision, buffering will be provided using shrubs, trees and fencing, thus satisfying this criteria. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and indicated that a lighting plan is needed for review. They further commented that for crime deterrent purposes, the parking area should have some surveillance capability from traveling public on SW Park Street. While this may seem to contradict the parking lot screening standards, it in fact, does not. The parking lot screening is intended to be more of a visual buffer that a full sight obscuring screen. It is assumed, therefore, that the parking lot will still be visible for surveillance purposes. FINDING: Because a lighting plan was not provided, the Tigard Police Crime Prevention Officer was unable to comment on the effectiveness of lighting area vulnerable to crime. In order to satisfy this standard, submit a proposed lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. The Americans witn Qisaaiiities Act (ADA): section 18.120.16 states that au +acuities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS 487. Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1-25 parking spaces are provided. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 18 The proposal shows 2 handicapped access spaces with a shared van accessible aisle. The plan shows the access ramp is in the aisle. Building Division Staff who enforce ADA - requirements through the building plans review process have stated that this ramp must be outside of the access aisle (on the sidewalk). FINDING: Because the access aisle as shown does not meet the ADA requirements, this standards has not been met. If the applicant submits revised plans that show the access ramp is not located within the aisle, this standard will be satisfied. CONDITION: Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as Children's Daycare. Code Section 18.62.030 lists Children's Daycare as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Criteria: Section 18.62 states that the required setbacks in the C-G zone are: 0-foot front yard (although there are buffer requirements for this site), 0 foot rear yard, except where abutting residential and 0 foot side yard, except where abutting residential. The proposed daycare site does not abut residential property except to the north, therefore, the building location meets the dimensional standards of the Code. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed and a hydrant flow test must be completed. The covered porch is considered part of the building square footage for Uniform Building Code (UBC) purposes, therefore, if it is between 20 feet and 10 feet of the parking lot, it must be one hour fire resistant construction. If the porch is less than 10 feet from the property line, it can not have unprotected openings. This would not be permitted because it would violate buffer requirements. The Building Division also reviews applications for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. In regard to compliance with these standards, it appears that there are some minor revisions that will be necessary prior to obtaining building permits. These changes include: providing access through the chain link fence along SW Park Street for fire personnel and revising the fence location in the rear of the site to provide enough room for fire fighting personnel to maneuver. These requirements are mentioned in oraer to assist me applicant in suomittai or me oullainy plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this approval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. Additional Building Division comments which resulted in a condition of approval have been incorporated into the body of this decision. Please refer questions regarding the comments from the Building Division to Jim Funk, Commercial Building Plans Examiner. The City of Tigard Police Department has offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a 1" water meter is required along with a minimum of a double check valve device assembly (backflow prevention device). They have also indicated that all portions of the proposed building must be within 250 feet of a fire hydrant as measured through accessible driving surfaces. This will be reviewed at time of building permits and additional fire hydrant will be required if necessary. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and proved comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), PGE, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and offered no comments or objections. ODOT was notified of the proposal and provided comments which have been incorporated into this decision. GTE was notified and indicated that the developer/owner must place conduits to GTE specifications. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 17 OF 18 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MARCH 11, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . / "� February 26, 1998 PREPAR BY: Julia H jduk DATE Associate Planner February 26, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i3curpInUulia\sdrldaycare.doc NOTICE OF DECISION SOR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 18 OF 18 e. it\ ' vi:' O s60 tP. > 0 -- *-S.W.PARK STREET4 - ---- - -� Z Z ami . . ilift. :,:1/4/4 4:44‘4/, < CL 1'c�'O0' , PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 I Ir AREA:14,567 SQ.FT. AAA-17936SQ Ft I '�► �/ f iAs� 1$ PLAY R LL AREA " o ��-- I ` 3 _ ` . 0 ♦ ♦.!►♦ .4•♦f♦ •k'f••♦♦ 4, �♦�1:i ••pixk• ♦ Off♦:• �$� EXISTING URBINO :' •♦O• •Ry •. . E " 0 PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE: 6,500 Sq. FL CASE NOES] &CASE N UAUSI: f SITE PUN SDR 97-0017 MLP 97-0019 EXHIBIT MAP N CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE MAFIA NT TO$UALO ,._ ,, ... - `, '♦'_''_ 4%4 CITY of TIGARD I, '■ . IY. OEOONA•NIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ! '7? • ♦' � , , 1� ■ PLANNING DIVISION elk re OPP' ♦ � V ICINITY MAP,le'4,,.. OR 91-0011 ",` ` •A, 7,■ sfe' < , MP 91-0019 0-r "'AVIV ' ' CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER � � I I lii4 . 4 11111111 ■ I1IIE_ fl• \ V k V I I aim. , ,tiii (** AiWj 4 ! Air DE lilithi • t/ .... ..1 i gic ammo& I r ,4 •0 • *B10111111 Mill I �•.■.,&Asp� ♦ it V♦• 0 200 400 ODO Fast osimarvAmr ■ • ,.- :..• , , v :a NPARKPL ■ ,,, ,, , IIIim0 tst��<,t'Tigard /I tntomlation on this map Y for general location ony and ■ t 4 VIEW CT dladd W variNad wM Ow Dawbpmwd SaMon DWbbn■r VIII ��. 1 NOR 97 Ir 11111■Mitirdlir 141 Community Development Plot date:Jan 14, 1998;c:lmagiclmagicdd.apr REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • .4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community Development AShaping A Better Community DATE: January 14,1998 'N- \ TO: Pete Nelson,US West Communications FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:[503]684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 91-0019 ➢ CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER z A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (M UARY16-19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. It you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. s.i- (1)1,4) PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ` o,�#/ U j � , We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. \14)P VS Please contact L of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: N t:Cs \ N \S Ni-- ..S—< -�Q�—•, -�1 y (Please provide the forfinving information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: \ I Phone Number(sl: c, -s : SRS,, I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQ4lISTOOMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development JAN 2 0 1998 Shaping 11 Better Community DATE: January 14,1998 CITY OF TIGARD TO: Michael Miller,Operations Water Department Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Derision STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Raiduk,Associate Planner(x401) Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[50316847297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR]91-0017/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ,44-T74o.4._um 14&V6 /%...)6 0 1Ficrt >NIS) u,. r? I-luwE xl- F f2EGzu/2EA4 FAfl . (0 AL - /t D C z-T o c OP ME P2vOvsEb ?farL..!)in)� �lArtlA 7 1�117f1/N 2 S > FEE'7' �.c'.4- 1C 26/iyD1 4Air As Memw2,r</, 77ixte 41.1- /i-Ti4,E4S/,8 Le Mt,l/b • 0 M/Nimcs//1 of ///�/A7EYL A 7 ✓U /5 ,rEtzU,l1- ') ALoNll jam//71- A- Miiviruu,0 PG' A4- /you 3Z-6. (?�dF V/H-vg 2) 1/ /1ss ./ra4-7 (B61 C/ c 7?ty&r77o v DEYrc -- v � (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Personisl Commenting: I Phone Numbertsl: y I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS 01.20/98 TUE 08:29 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING 001 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community Development RECD JAN Z 5 1998iapinn.l Better Community DATE: January 14,1998 JAN 2 0 1998 Tualatin Valle Water District -ATA u YE OFFICES FROM:j? City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone:(5031639.4171 Fax (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available.to o -ff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal i e uture. If ou wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - ! 'Y 26,19981. Y.0 may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If VO Raffle I I nd by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: __ ��JJ T c 5 N c 7— , A/ 77/ [,c)D 'S c- � L/7 C H(Z( 1 - <----:517 (Please provide the fo([awine information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): q� 307 S /DR 97-0017/MLP 97.0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS S REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development U 5 Shaping Better Community JAN 1 5 1998 DATE: January 14,1998 - —) RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program By - JAN 2 8 1998 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner fx4OTl Phone:(5031639 L 1140)684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 91-0019 ➢ CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information Name of Personfsl Commenting l,l 1 Phone Number[sl: - ZSZY€5�— I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS y reA UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY cc l?)°5 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 1998 TO: Julia Powell Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA SUBJECT: Children's Village Day Care Center, SDR 97-0017, MLP 97-0019 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44(Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards,July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties,or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists (may exist). Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone:503/648-8621 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O TIGARD Community Development Shaping. Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: January 14,1998 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant JAN 2 0 1998 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner 0x4011 Phone:(503)639.4111 Fax:[5031684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER IA request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,5671 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MONDAY - JANUARY 26,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: ,,� .) I Phone Number's): i - 44C)C- I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS & CITY OF' ARD • Community Development Shaping A Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: January 14,1998 JAN 161998 TO: David Scott,Building Official CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Rabid,Associate Planner(x4071 Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0017/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 3 o�L OJ- 11 `r I .o - A f u T / 1-A s .. 1 7/V i A A f1►a is. e / tT , e - Ftit I-� arUr� 1-1,%P I7• -ISO' eT G // �x�!� tr,t w li 1�r 5 M / 4j, F 1G!"`� `t{S f.•e Pt dkJ 1?1 l i Tire, �i�?Ycvr�-n el ems(#"sl �/�u r/ai' (i.ri 0 /0 ay, /f►f) t . 0. lt'/1l L/ r�[U�A�t/ 6. �,� /�L li/ /i+ 4Gt/+ ua / ,'. , i•T „r.fst 5q.,/ Cd - lL I t �t 4 A ea t G O U /- r �I 1tdr», Orti Iy, j yf Ir4 (Please provide the farrowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: %/y► J I Phone Number[sl: SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS `4J-',- '}J pcYOO11."'G 1 11...dr, OO o 000 000 oOO 00 O IMf�'hiL7GN�►Iti� W•p° pop 0 o ° •:‘,_ (2) •4 RI Ft, ,•b'o� • o,(Joo,V FILLER MATERIAL, �►�;"-:, •C ��•. 1�,I.ø- '!�- -GD - PAVIIVCs GRAVEL SLAG .'�,';.e� �► - a CASE `'•s�'_""".•M •. `r '•CU '3 6 Exi=4i�lsI oN Jo INT :..;;„. , ': .. . , H . C 5 �0�. : �(i), NO SCALE Al NO SCALE TYPICAL AT .,,: f: ''k ,t,•.�Al NO SCALE - • [J ” ; ; . e_— - _.__._ _ ._.._ ..__ _ ._ ___ _.__—.___. __.. _—_____ .____.—__. _.__ ____.__.___________ —_._._ �_.._--_ _._. __. --_—___—_____ __- __._ —..—___—_____ ..._ • ' • •- .--._. ________ .-_.-__ ___ ._-_._._-.-_-�_ - .. ---._---___._-__--_ _ _ ._ . _-_-_ ________- . -- ..__ -- _ .- _. _-._ ___- Y . , 7:• - _ 329'-1• .1 b'-m' b'-m' f - v-- . {`s-:;, .., . 24'-0' 45 -2 1a r 5. 0' CHAIN LINK FENCE —SITE LIGHTING 1 o � r.'-. -—MONUMENT SIGNt,'M 1�:. f :. ` : F W/REDlU00D LATS t WALKWAY I ^� _D __ -;; 't` `&! : � :. i I --- A-1 _7 j •;4 Si�j t af' �a • DOI I STD. STL. POST ,/ ;. i ,k •CD CONC. PAD AT EXT. 8 -0 LE GATE t —ENTRY SIGN SEE I DOOR, TYP. SEE 6 — W/LOGK , r,� x W/HANDIGAP SIGN A I / I ft‘w000 Al 1 _ 01 `fs. / ,� © / • I //M ::ITL�4 . '. - r- 1 I //// I ASPHALT DRIVE CV -- ,48 -/, i 1 I � . I �L rj-_-_.-7-.-J ' n-� , r N e / / / n �a �J - I/ — - VIII ti # II N Q, / ill 181•446 1�' N i • , T60' / ''• . . ,, Ni\ I • -I . 4411 . ao , i Z____L in N ED CONC. WALK \•%_, B' --� .0� %/..I . -- _ ---- . 1 fi . j I F #: :441A1 '- : ... .4.. fir. - --—�-- / L�L�i O �r V r 91' f• 't. c\.r r ii- I f / `• - _ , I I I ? - -� b'- ' HIGH U IOOP aLR'11°STER"Ef�ICLOSURE r± / RCV 1.5�011� • I -16 O.C. FRAMING, W/LAP SIDING, WOOD , . .. d _ . • , r ` i n �► �� E!I # TRIM AND WOOD TOP GAP, W/b'-m' GATE. / _ '0 • . _ ; ' �{ PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING , .C\---;t' 4;1 SITE LK#ITING I •I!U_ _z� i��-', J I I S,.b. B i 'A' FI�1't1F2E r i'-e , I �� ' ----� , AY 1 1 I ` -- — -- -- —r.---mow--w--w--w—.wow-ter-- —dam-- -- -- ..• —ww---- -- -- _-- --wwwr_-- w-- --�w- —.; . , 1 3': : . . 8I'-b' ;;..._ TYP — SITE LIGHTING 12'-4; -- — -- - _21D-m .— '�:I::P s 5I TE Pi.�1i1 .i• . Y. �� .. .. .i 'fir '�'s�1. � • ',p` '� _"'� r r' / y���ti, t/•j, A � rs .`;� I•Aw ''S..: 46 A BGALEs 1/16' • I'.mr •s�•� , .,,r, t �. . • • REQUEST E T F 0 R COMMENTS CITY TIiGARD Community Development Shaping.Shaping A Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: January 14,1998 1 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer JAN 5 1998 CITY OF TIGGm FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajdult,Associate Planner 1x401) Phone:(5031639-4171 Fax:(503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLP)91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. 7 Written comments provided below: "Lb' O U 1`�' n Aoc • coo �5 not `` o. e Sc('e( GtQa cc-lam Qock *, v%ovAd► v\44 ow 4Qk I Yr& 01k0 1.4.4441 `1 and b(Cia l_ek)COVIVL . VW C(% - 61''%4 41V\N J QV't5, Wk k)A`\4-416 °A 01 °I°6‘ \1Y)N'k SLR ci°";9-\\av1I L+ LtXQQ(: -'"y -Ccic/i" '\40\it1\to6 efiNkt_ or\ V r� (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: d 1v‘ , Phone Number(s): c: I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TEL : Jan 15 '98 13 : 31 No .004 P .01 REQUEST FOR COMMEN i S CITr OF 110AQD Cornmuninf Deveingrunt Shaping 9l 1;ettcrComi'utnity DATE: AWNS 14159@ TO: Tualatin Allis Mk&Recreation Department Planning Manager FROM: ;Dv al Mani Planning Dlvlsien STAFF CONTACT: lull Pwell H Associate liner[ QA a RE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISM 91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER 4 A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-O. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 1 8.116, 1 8.120, 18.150, 1 8.182 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vlclnfnl Mep and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NUD YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If YOU are unable 18 mooed by 010 abolfe date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1114.4) tA-41.-4-on-LthdR, &flu, (Pfease prm ixic tite fvuo ing information)Name of Percents]Commenting: ,c), /Iv 5/4 K !Phone Nombertsl: 6(f 5--6q3� I BOA 97-0017/MLP 97.0019 CMItDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTED PLANNI S CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping s'1 Better Community • RECEIVNG DATE: January 14,1998 / / SAN TO: Engineering CITY OF WARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MONDAY - JANUARY 26,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: r fi _ iA _AI _ Au .I V (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: W67 - Phone Number[sl: ,-n - ?q- 7 �7 I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAVREOUEST FOR COMMENTS Oregon January 26, 1998 DEPARTMENT OF City of Tigard RECEIVED PLANNING TRANSPORTATION Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard JAN 2 6 1998 Region 1 Tigard, OR 97223 Clr(OF TIGARD Att: Julia Hajduk FILE CODE: Re: MLP 97-0019: Children's Village Day Care Center PLA9-2A-TIG-2W Hwy 99W X Park St. Thank you for providing ODOT the opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposed development. The subject site is in the vicinity of OR 99W. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, OR 99W has a Statewide level of importance. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the facility's safe and efficient high to moderate-speed operations with limited interruptions of flow in urban an urbanizing areas. Our Traffic Analyst, Simon Eng PE, has reviewed the site plan. We have the following comments: • We recommend the City require the Applicant to relocate the proposed access as far west of the Park St./ Grant Ave. intersection to minimize the potential conflicts with traffic turning from and onto Grant St. This is particularly important to help minimize the potential impacts to the operation of the signalized intersection of 99W and Park St. Using the I.T.E. Trip Generations Manual (Code 565) and based on the size (6,500 ft.2) of the proposed development in parcel 1, the Day Care facility could generate approximately 85 and 89 trips in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Without a traffic impact study, it is difficult to tell whether any traffic queuing problem would arise on Park St. at its intersections with Grant St. and highway 99W as a result of the site generated trips. The driveway is only 60 feet west of Grant St. The signal at the intersection of 99W and Park St. operates as part of a system through this area. Due to the operation of the signal system along 99W which is to facilitate the progression of through traffic on 99W, ODOT will not be able to provide any additional green time for traffic (existing + site generate trips) on Park St. neither by increasing the cycle length of the signal nor reducing the green time for the tftl;,'1 through traffic on 99W. krki ,/ 00) 1 123 NW City of Tigard Portland, OR 97209-4037 MLP 97-0019: Children's Village Day Care Center (503) 731-8200 734-1850(11-9-h ODOT Comments 1-26-98 FAX (503) 731-8259 / • We recommend the City require half St. improvements along the Park St. Traffic generated by Parcel 2 is not considered at this time. When the City receives a request for the development of Parcel 2, we will evaluate the potential traffic impacts. If you have any questions regarding the traffic comments, Simon Eng can be reached at 731-8223. I can be reached at 731-8258. Please forward a copy of the Decision and Conditions of Approval for this case. Marah Danielson, Planner Development Review cc: Simon Eng, Dorothy Upton, Sonya Kazen, Doug Anderson, ODOT Region 1 Jane Estes, Rick Keene, ODOT District 2A 2 City of Tigard MLP 97-0019: Children's Village Day Care Center ODOT Comments 1-26-98 sDXZ 97 . 00/7 UIR* UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY FACSIMILE . TRANSMISSION To: Date: Fax Number: X4 -1 From: Phone Number: oCc Fax Number: (503) 640-3525 We are sending a total of _ pages, including this cover sheet Comments: 4.4.err, At et tors S 21-0 — Sa ee��,� 165 N. First, Suite 270, Hillsboro Oregon 97124, Phone: (603) 648-8621 `� •r1 ice` ' -:: �' ♦ ',-•'y,' ,--0.; . .10... 1' 4r fl (7- de ism N - ■ N./Z,. ./. .. . .••-,:::,...••'..- ' O. yr 14:41 ,,,‘ ... . .,...,,,,,„.. .. ___,,,,,....e,.._ , r,4,,.......„ .. :, ..,...„..., ® ' •�'i'�.;::ter:,j. ►^ r=:;;:;1: E."'. N/ s y ' ` Ae ..,: ,yam �j •• '�� �'� '� �} ��+��``• 5 s SSA. .� III�1• ' �����,�a ._�ii T.''l �� NL� 11 ity. liariliviir,11 ifrei,J01.1.7_: ieL-_,.1111 a o ir r . I ...41V10.40P. /"-1.--'.- '' ' §D 1 11 , r.r4,111 t ii WV° .,-. G...,. - . " -71-11 air EMI .s.,:-..-_-;.■:.:. A. ik Iliall,A- -•'' isio 11::41tc -',..-. •11--4041.0=9-,---.. II- 1`.�. � ��� , wit. u �;. m► fiil� .' all� . grim ,o, m'a' 3c oil 1 . K` ` � 1 ' �� ■ri � h' Eli` 'kh 1!: L. t!/!, 4 t, T '�� 1[� r d�. �� 1$2,'-''''.'-N,',l�� \ N. -' , . \ .41161811 �t/ , ® ft9t 1 .'i d ais t h,',„ ►fit III I lt. , E■ iA A 4iik ,k . / ' f i +` Blues ‘•a Gm Nt a +111if1: !.�r �.1111111671 Val% 1 Bancaw_...f4i i.,fri OM IN • . •'”' • .:-.. t'"1 . 4 :.:* 1, 611 , tswI/� >�,r ' it •-...:....... „4, . ri'kt'4',4 4 PO:4 t°int 1 fi'C ' 1 1 14 I-1,g'ilik.\NI I IR"I 1 ikic-,-----4.mtv.--;_, Irani , i,44 4"0:4„,i7.:-...-....,--.,:,.:•.,... ...se..-6s.,'....4-;.i , , \ ... . .. AV--.. N ' ' # 4.,.. -- sir- %IP, ;.4-7irp -,-.;,%-#4,. p 0... I- �:�'�. ` ,,,, II �`,-- , 049_ .�A�j • ...3 �L ve .'.r+wn,d' y •� ," �''I ilk ., and--• �, ' • tI1 1 `\ 't,II i t,':i1 �� �; � • `� , � � ;l�4► � tj i Mar+• j/` 41�4 �_ 4 , ,r- a/��%� I 111 eig d ...5 3 in isms 1.1 :,� v, ° ..:A.'''''' ' 4,,.1'1..f-4.01.,' '_j 11 k,&-fik 44*.-..* 4,, , 1‘\11.VoiSliger' 44Am WES WAIITTTIN llir, agitr4f..•:".. :Alit- 44f, .,.,* 4,.44,,.., / 4 . ■■ 4,sri-%**>6e..Raz weITI Ilimigt 1 13%111111KZ__TA, imr..-,,.,, of- 't. w`I �� : ,` 1■>fla mtN 1117 "4 1 iiri E Wilii taxa WM 44: .!.., Milk ItZii. ",i. .. tk 114).4t.r4riill C, arAIP"' 46- 4'‘A 0\4`.'''N''' ' It-- jr4tiiidt..--_. ,,,--„,, EA w! m• ,,.. gl ,--- 'tale- 4 i ..: • 1, 4420'0, 41 .. . # 4,4911.1 illinri IMII , ,ti, NEI / .... iti ,i. ....41.40, 44% 114i:■,■1.1.; 40 =AN . lici:t. *At/N., RN I • I :{ • >J ilLaA�r! 11 vitf rare rla�r o '.�wa. _ =r , 'poll Ar t��, • r r 011" _' riN "1f¢�01• ?-� I_-_.,y eel II,!afi: 1 7 ;ore ,1, 4 Mr 61 some M - `'J', rill u OW A& A w- ---#• • ,I1r- um. ma oviikb , , . . ;., 3§ mosti, 11 ,13Eir go VlbAsson-ri-ii NEL.w. gun 11111■TIM mik ■n• iMI-,-aa, 1 �.r% 1 r r i1#M E 3/15' , . ' ._ maw , '� r; r s mint2111 ME � a* ■.I 1/„ „ ,.. ;- i ��IZI:c:;23 :-.:--1,!..2 5:41 414440, i. `, '-. ' !` learn witti3.633P-, -, =--..i,gilli_.', sm.. ..!. 01=-"*P„. M...111m 11,1,,,,, -----4 IHR_Tii r,:k , .101% , ' IF- iglikitt,..'''' 'IggilEggl 1177- aztaltill il - . 1 ' iii. 4 • I oat. ,,,E .,Ni- i,. . .:44, - 4•:. vAlklitiLt , , . ,....44 law. . i.,, , Y '`"i ' ' .Tri i � : rN kw, . ' ' ,s / 4a414%Gilltii t .� a MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: February 24, 1998 TO: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019, Children's Village Day Care WCTM 2S1 02CB, Tax Lot 1805 Description: This application is for a land partition to divide the property into two parcels of 27,936 sf and 14,567 sf. In addition, the applicant intends to construct a 6,500 sf day care facility on proposed Parcel 1 (27,936 sf). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of the intersection of Grant Street. Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on Park Street in this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. The roadway is paved, but not fully improved adjacent to this site. The roadway was improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of this site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the traffic impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of the day care facility project on Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of the half-street improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur that improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of Parcel 2 is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City would be necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the day care facility on Parcel 1. Staff is concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 1 very close (within 35 feet) to the intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempts to avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on opposite sides of the street. There is an existing gravel, rivewayvfor this site further west from the proposed driveway location• cur n' i1iries up well with an existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. The existing gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the Grant Street intersection and would be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts with the intersection of Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of Park Street. This location would not conflict with the building location, but would necessitate a redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign, the alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant be required to locate the driveway for the day care center at the existing gravel driveway location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700. 2. Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing 8-inch public water line located adjacent to the south edge of Park Street. The applicant will need to apply for water service from the City and the Public Works department will install the necessary water service(s). 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 2 The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on-site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in-lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site (adjacent to Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on Parcel 1 would be $ 9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of Parcel 2. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 3 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review three paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two mylar copies of the partition plat for City Engineer's signature. 2. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 4. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 4 5. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 6. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to Parcel 1. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. curb or curb and gutter d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk f. street striping g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer h. underground utilities driveway apron j. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 7. A profile of SW Park Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 8. The driveway location for the day care facility on Parcel 1 shall be constructed where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and shall align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. 9. The applicant shall apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 10. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 5 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 13. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 14. Prior to a final building inspection on Parcel 1, the applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9,075.00. i:\eng\brianr\comments\sdr97-17.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 6 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 5, 1998 TO: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer f RE: SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019, Children's Village Day Care WCTM 2S1 02CB, Tax Lot 1805 *** REVISED COMMENTS *** Description: This application is for a land partition to divide the property into two parcels of 27,936 sf and 14,567 sf. In addition, the applicant intends to construct a 6,500 sf day care facility on proposed Parcel 1 (27,936 sf). Findings: 1. Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of the intersection of Grant Street. Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on Park Street in this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. The roadway is paved, but not fully improved adjacent to this site. The roadway was improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of this site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the traffic impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of the day care facility project on Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of the half-street improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur that improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of Parcel 2 is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City would be necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 1 The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the day care facility on Parcel 1. Staff is concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is very close (within 35 feet) to the intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempts to avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on opposite sides of the street. In addition, the parcel just east of this site (Hot 'n Now) was conditioned as a part of SDR 92-0018 to provide an access easement to this parcel. The Hot 'n Now site currently has a driveway that aligns with SW Grant Street; this driveway is restricted to encourage traffic to turn right out of the site. A "Right Turn Only" sign is present along with a small concrete island. It should be noted that the City did not require Hot 'n Now to physically construct a driveway connection to this site; only an easement was required to allow for the possibility of a shared access. Staff considered the possibility of requiring the applicant to redesign the site plan to utilize the Hot 'n Now driveway. However, both City staff and ODOT staff have a concern with the close proximity of the Hot 'n Now driveway to the signalized intersection at Pacific Highway. Pacific Highway is a very congested arterial roadway and the stacking that occurs during peak hours at the intersection will make the Hot 'n Now driveway very difficult, and potentially unsafe, to use, particularly if vehicles are attempting a left turn from Park Street into the driveway. The combination of stacking cars on Park Street with vehicles desiring to turn left into the site will create more congestion at the signalized intersection. ODOT recommended that the driveway to this site be moved further to the west to provide additional separation from the Pacific Highway signal. City staff agrees. There is an existing gravel driveway for this site further west from the proposed driveway location that currently lines up well with an existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. The existing gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the Grant Street intersection and would be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts with the intersection of Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of Park Street. In addition, the separation from the Pacific Highway signalized intersection will be increased to 300 feet, which will satisfy ODOT and City concerns. This location would not conflict with the building location, but may necessitate a redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign, the alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant be required to locate the driveway for the day care center at the existing gravel driveway location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700. 2. Water: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 2 This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing 8-inch public water line located adjacent to the south edge of Park Street. The applicant will need to apply for water service from the City and the Public Works department will install the necessary water service(s). 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on-site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 3 on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in-lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site (adjacent to Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on Parcel 1 would be $ 9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of Parcel 2. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review three paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 4 B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two mylar copies of the partition plat for City Engineer's signature. 2. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 4. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 5. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 6. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to Parcel 1. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 5 c. curb or curb and gutter d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk f. street striping g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer h. underground utilities driveway apron j. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 7. A profile of SW Park Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 8. The driveway location for the day care facility on Parcel 1 shall be constructed where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and shall align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. 9. The applicant shall apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 10. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 13. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 6 be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 14. Prior to a final building inspection on Parcel 1, the applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 9,075.00. is\eng\brianr\comments\sdr97-17.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0017 Children's Village Day Care PAGE 7 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIS O IIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: January 14,1998 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner 1x4011 Phone:1503)639-4171 Fax:[503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0011/MINOR LAND PARTITION MP)91-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - JANUARY 26,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: I Phone Number[s): I SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS LE-Indicates 13 Automatic Netlflcatlons of All City Prolectsl j CrlArea:tel to (S1 twl '1 - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 0 Piles for review to Library MTTIsekts) FILE NOM.: SDI 97 -oa0/IWLP 97-oo/9 FILE NAMELSJ: L'gy ( <e-t h . '- CITY OmCES k; _ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Manning Supervisor oro.n or COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./om.s...r.aw.iw m OLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,cn .Pr«.n,rononK. _BUILDING DIV./David Scott,BmldingOdkW _ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,>Aware.R«I.wEngager WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,op«.ion.M.n,g.r _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Onyri.cpm.. OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,ProperlyManagn _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS ,:)4,-,,,,,A. .',:. , , 2 TUALATIN HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.H ALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE f ®TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63 NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Planning Manager Tire Marshall Administrative Office ulia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 `k:k ' LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS ° `` t } ; ;: ; ''=` ,- f' 0 CITY OF BEAVERTON El CITY OF TUALATIN _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,N.tghorhd.Coors. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. 0 METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE E CITY OF DURHAM �,600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ ro US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281.3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.& DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Greenapace.Coordinator(CPA'a2OA5i 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 El CITY OF KING CITY Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) 21 WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Building#16, Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Plamng 155 N. First Avenue 21 CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350, MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration - Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrero LEO 000T,REGION 1 _Brent Curtis(CPA's; PO Box 3621 /Sonya Kazen,a,lpmt.R.o coo.a. _Scott King(cPaa) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Mike Borreson(Engineer) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Tice(lo*.) Portland Building 106, Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Tom Harry(cis...+w ,gyp,) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue 0 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy Icun..n Pt ape i Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,PsendSp.calui PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES —BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS�2�PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC —TCI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay,Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt .Bnan Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr,Region Manager Michael Kiser,Project Planner 14200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 -GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft,Engineering OREGON ELECTRIC R/R _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. R/R( ^US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: OR030546 (P(/RUNiTON NORTHERN/SANTA i URPRFDASSORJ Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Nelson Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay,Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 hapatryymasterslrtcnohce."st 2Jan-38 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING cm Of TIIG4, ARD Community,Deverapment Shaping l7 Better STAtitt, O(F O County of Washington )ss. 0°G°k\ City of Tigard ) I, (Patricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: ;Check,ccrocnate Bags)Ba.o') E NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ,fin ' -COM LP 91GY�i9(i'l •em50:16‘ � (i'Z,: AMENDED NOTICE / ' t II A /1 ,,i.' its • 4 ,,6 I ry / -2e / i ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Fee No/Name Reference) (Date d Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council O NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: '7:-_> ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Fde No/Name Reference) (Dated Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FOR: (TypeiKno of Notice) (Fie No.Name Reference) (Dated Public Hearing,dapplicable) i A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached. marked Exhibit "A", was ailed to each a- ed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Udall"i a the 4 da of V. _ 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the ,mwday of 1/,/ , % - 1998,postage prepaid. ��' /•:,7.•, OFFICIAL SEAL rrrr t DIANE M J ELDER KS • . ..-. a NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON - `� ®.:.® COMMISSION NO.046142 i (Person that oared Notice MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999% Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 19,2(bii.--;)/fd ii / 0 �'��, • .�. as NOTARY PUBLIC 0 I ; CON `: � h0 . "di„'„1 44 a& Efit LPR 07,1999 ��� My Commission a I 1" 11 g t . a ,-, OFFICIAL SEAL r DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �,•„� COMMISSION NO.046142 1 M''COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07.1999 "NOTICE I F AM II I I ECISION FINAL APPEIIATE" ak■ kll:tV SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 97-00171 "' MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 97-0019 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER ShapiwA Better Community Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has EXTENDED the appeal date for the previous Notice of Amended Decision to allow for publication in the Oregonian Newspaper. The Conditions of Approval remain the same. The decision will be final ten (10) days after this notice is published as per Section 18.32.120 of the Tigard Development Code. THE NEW FINAL APPEAL DATE IS MARCH 26, 1998 AT 3:30 P.M. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel referred to as Parcel 1 on proposed partition site plan. APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. V' " KT-__ j , , 0$- 44 V 44(4:4,>' 116)40411 it , *, , * ... . w4 'AIIIIIP Op Vfolo _ ,, ii 4w., .„,_ Ili_ I --L- * ,44 4 � • ��4 - - - - - C G .ir lb 1 0u, _ iL! 1 , wsS evy _r.,..... L 7.--... w_air If, '• _ : — M. 4--'- w � r 0 ♦ . • i 1' 1 0:410 t * _jirla II . . SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION APPEAL DATE 5vA- `7 1--CU! //1 4 1,1-"1 r'fl L-Uk'E/4';S VI LLrf-7 ( •/ 62/-�IAMLI II t/Sjr'I .102CB-00302 2S102CB-01100 EXHIBIT B. QAYUM ABDUL AND ISMAT O'CONNOR STEPHEN C "/�"PEA-LDt2tTE11 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 13150 SW GRANT r " LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CB-01200 2S 102CB-01300 HESS DAVID A&GAIL K LEFEVRE REBECCA J 13170 SW GRANT AVE 208 MOCKINGBIRD CIRCLE TIGARD,OR 97223 SANTA ROSA,CA 95405 2S102CB-01500 2S102CB-01600 DURDEL CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L EASTERLY JOSEPH H G&TONIA 10425 SW PARK ST 10395 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01700 2S102CB-01800 KIMMEL KRISTA L PUBLIC STORAGE 10365 SW PARK STREET PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S102CB-01802 2S102CB-01804 BARUCH ISAAC TRUSTEE TACO BELL CORP#06-578 1333 THIRD AVE 17901 VON KARMAN SEATTLE,WA 98101 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-01805 2S102CB-01900 HARRIS ENTERPRISE TBLD CORP 17901 V N 17901 VON KARMAN E,CA 92714 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-06801 2S102CB-06900 HESS PHILIP JOSEPH LIM LAI HENG AND 10475 SW PARK ST 10467 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-07100 2S102C8-07200 NGUYEN MY DUNG ANNA&HAI M AULD SANDRA A 10453 SW PARK ST 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00500 2S103DA-00600 HEPPNER SELMA W MEYER DUANE FRANCIS 359 SW 5TH ST 13210 SW WATKINS AVE DUNDEE,OR 97115 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00700 2S103DA-00800 HATCH JAMES S/MARCIEL J& BRADEN ROBERT W&KATHLEEN J 13205 SW WATKINS 13175 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 SD k (17--o0J7/ 4GP y7.—OO lei /-)••i-I'e.D N VILLA-6e- op-y a9- r4/77 C,C0., 4F-1 ( ( '1007V4120 -xA/MU 2S103DA-04600 2S103DA-04700 �� .� n In TI�OSEN DAVID S/LEANNA M URL JOY B PP f`�-( 1'0570 SW PARK ST 13370 SW TIGARD,OR 97223 D,OR 97223 2S103DA-04701 25103DA-04702 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 17901 VON KARMAN 4114 SW FLOWER ST IRVINE,CA 92714 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103DA-04800 2S103DA-04900 URL JOY B MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& 13370 SW WATKINS 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06100 HARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. PAPEN CINDY&DAN 2300 SW 1ST AVENUE, SUITE 104 13450 SW WATKINS ST PORTLAND OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 ,, , on3 /39g WATER LEAF ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS MARTHA BISHOP 5��. ��,�, 621 SW MORRISON STREET, SUITE 125 10590 SW COOK LANE �. � A PORTLAND OR 97205 TIGARD OR 972238``,,-1�1 /Gi 4 4 . -M' W AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '' CITY OF TIOARD Community,Development Shaping ,Better Community STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, (Patricia G. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (O.d eacomae.Saris)Babwr ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: .A,. 1 ) I '7 6 - 1 o 's I i<<_ I 4 , e . 11/ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) _ [ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Fie N o,Name Reference) (Date of a Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council TT NonCE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ±t- AMENDED NOTICE (Fie No Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Hang) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FOR: I (Typei7Gnd of Notice) (Fie No/Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Heanng,1 aDPi cade) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each f ed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B" e - . e i- _ •say of `-// e' 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the VI •=y of i d., 2i'li./1 1998,postage prepaid. 4W ;7, (P •nthe -=7-• , • -ffJ- ' Subscribed and sworn/affirmed bef"o?e me on the j D ay of G, , 19 7a -'r,' OFFICIAL SEAL ' / t DIANE M JELDERKS ; , NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON /iji! ih.4142 ill L �,„� COMMISSION NO.046 42 NOTARY PUBLIC OF I R ;ON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07. 1999 My Commission Expires: 717/9 .._, "NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION" SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDRI 91-0017/ 4.11-40 MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 97-0019 CITY OF r Co munityDevelopment CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Shaping A Better Community This decision was amended to correct factual errors and to further specify reasons for certain improvement requirements,however,there was no change to the conditions of approval. SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel refered to as Parcel 1 on proposed partition site plan. APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: The majority of the subject Parcel is zoned General Commercial; C-G. Approximately 30 feet of the western most portion of proposed Parcel 2 is zoned Low Density Residential; R-3.5. ZONING DESIGNATION: The majority of the parcel is zoned General Commercial; C-G. Approximately 30 feet of the western most portion of proposed Parcel 2 is zoned Low Density Residential; R-3.5. LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Submit a revised landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division that shows the location of the parking lots trees to be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). 2. Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, planting, fences, or temporary or permanent obstructions between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the proposed landscaping meets the standards of the code. 3. Provide written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. The location of the dumpster opening must be relocated to make it more accessible to garbage haulers. 4. Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces provided so that staff can confirm that the required parking spaces have been provided. 5. Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. 6. Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. 7. Submit the Final Plat Application for the Partition. Final Plat Submission Requirements are as follows: A. Submit for City review, three (3) paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative; B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County and by the City of Tigard; and C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two (2) mylar copies of the partition plat for the City Engineer's signature. 8. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for proposed Parcel 1 , the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 9. Obtain a public improvement permit and compliance agreement for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at Tigard City Hall. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 19 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submitta,, provide the Engineering Department with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 11 . Provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to proposed Parcel 1. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb or curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; I. driveway apron; and J. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 13. Provide a profile of SW Park Street, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 14. Construct the driveway for the daycare facility on proposed Parcel 1 where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 01700 on the north side of SW Park Street. 15. Submit a revised parking lot plan in relation to the re-located drive. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division. 16. Apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 17. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. 18. Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 19 • 19. Complete the requ„ed public improvements, obtain cor,.,.Lional acceptance from the City, and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 20. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG” format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 21. Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $9,075. 22. Construct all site improvements as per the approved site plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: While no applications for development of this site have been filed, a site development review on an adjacent parcel (SDR 93-0012/MIS 93-0006) imposed conditions which had a potential for impact on this site. SDR 93-0012/MIS 93-0006 was for the construction of a Taco Bell with a shared access connection with the driveway to the east of the site (Hot `n' Now). The Hot `n' Now site is directly to the east of the subject property. The original approval was appealed. Among other issues, there were requests from the neighbors that the Hot `n' Now developer be required to dedicate an easement for the future use of tax lot 01805, which is the subject parcel. In the Planning Commission Final Order No. 93-15 PC (pages 13-14) the issue of this easement is discussed. It was determined that, while providing for an easement may be desirable, "it is not known what development may be proposed on the Harris property or what the future change in the Comprehensive Plan/Zoning designation may be (or whether it will even occur). Therefore, requiring Hot `n' Now to construct a driveway stubout to the Harris property (existing daycare site) is unnecessary and premature at this time." The Final Order goes on to state that the Hot `n' Now should provide for an easement but "whether or not this easement would be utilized would be decided at the time of the review of the development proposal for the Harris property." As will be discussed in greater detail further in this decision, staff has taken this easement into consideration and determined that it is not in the best interest of public safety to require this existing easement to be utilized. Discussions with ODOT specifically regarding the use of this easement indicate that they are opposed to further utilizing the existing Hot `n' Now driveway as it is very close to the intersection of Highway 99W. In addition, the awkward turning movements required for the right-in/right-out driveway would require people who live down SW Park Street and who would utilize the daycare to travel out onto Highway 99W and around the block in order to pick-up and drop-off their children. This would result in more traffic on an already busy highway and the increased frustration could result in people ignoring the traffic signs, which would cause a much more dangerous situation than having a driveway further west on SW NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 19 Park Street. While the ,,,,ndition required by the Planning t.. nmission Final Order No. 93-15 PC imposed an easement to the subject site, it did not require the authority to actually construct a linking driveway without permission of the Hot `n' Now property. The SDR for the construction of the Hot `n' Now (SDR 92-0018/MIS 92-0016) also allowed for a lot line adjustment between the subject site and the Hot `n' Now property to the east. The original approval for this proposal was appealed, however the appeal issue was related to the right-in/right-out driveway and had nothing to do with the lot line adjustment or tax lot 01805 itself. In reviewing this file, staff discovered that prior to the Hot `n' Now, there was a fuel station on the site. As part of cleaning up this fuel station site, some soil was placed on the subject property for aeration. The City understands DEQ issued a "letter of no further action" for this site, however, if contaminants are uncovered during development of the property, DEQ should be notified. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue. The site is identified as WCTM 2S103CB, Tax Lot 01805. The site is bordered to the south and west by property zoned General Commercial (C-G). The property to the east is zoned R-3.5 and the property to the north, across SW Park Street, is zoned R-4.5. The properties on all sides are developed consistent with their zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is relatively flat, with no significant vegetation other than grasses. The site is currently vacant. The proposal is to partition the lot into two (2) parcels. The eastern most parcel (Parcel 1) will be 27,936 square feet and will be developed with a 6,500 square foot daycare center facility. The western most parcel (Parcel 2) will be 14,567 square feet and is not proposed to be developed at this time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements on SW Park Street. The Engineering Department has estimated the cost of the half-street improvements to be approximately $200 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 19 current bid tabulations. ,assuming a cost of $200 per lineal it is estimated that the total cost of the half-street improvements along the portion of the parcel to be developed with a daycare facility on SW Park Street is $65,916 (329.58 feet x $200). The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan I I/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $23,862. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $74,568 ($23,862 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $23,862, the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $50,706 impact on the collector and arterial systems. The rough proportionality test means that the conditions imposed must be "roughly proportional" to the impacts associated with a development. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs (in this case, the street improvements) required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. Further more, Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. In order for the street system to function to serve all properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. Although the requirements imposed have a slightly higher estimated value than the unmitigated impact, the City finds that the conditions meet the rough proportionality test. There is unmeasured impacts on nearby local streets which adds to the unmitigated cost. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR LAND PARTITIONS: Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that the newly created lot will continue to allow for commercial development. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and by the application and review process. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 19 • Adequate public faciliti. are available to serve the propose.., Adequate public facilities are, or will be conditioned to be, available to serve the proposal and will be constructed to meet City standards. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and The proposal complies, or will be conditioned to comply, with the lot size and dimensional requirements. This is discussed in detail in SPECIAL PROVISIONS, pages 6 and 7 All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52). The public facilities and proposed improvements are, or will be conditioned to be, in compliance with City standards. The actual improvement requirements for each proposed parcel is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Staff finds that the criteria above have been met outright or will be met as a result of conditions imposed in this decision in further sections. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 18.162.050 contains the following special provisions for lots created through the Partition Process: Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The average minimum lot width for the C-G zone is 50 feet. The plan submitted shows proposed Parcel 1 with a width of approximately 158 feet and proposed Parcel 2 with an average width of approximately 303 feet, thus meeting the criteria. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There is no minimum lot area requirement in the C-G zone, therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right- of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. Both parcels have adequate access and frontage on SW Park street, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both proposed lots are currently vacant. The daycare on proposed Parcel 1 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks further in this decision. Any structures placed on proposed Parcel 2 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks at the time of Site Development Review. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 19 Front Yard Determinate..,, for Flag Lot: When the partit,_.,ed lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. Both parcels have direct access to SW Park Street, a public street. There is a fire hydrant at the corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street and another one at the corner of SW Park Street and SW Watkins Avenue. Both existing fire hydrants are within close proximity to the site, however, due to the large frontage of the site (approximately 488 feet), an additional fire hydrant may be required. Fire protection requirements for the daycare are discussed further in this decision under the Building Divisions comments. Fire protection for proposed Parcel 2 will be reviewed at time of Site Development Review. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The partition does not require the use or creation of a common drive, therefore, this standard does not apply. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 18.108.040 requires that all vehicular access and egress connect directly with a public or private street and the vehicular access be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances for commercial uses. Access for proposed Parcel 1 will be addressed further in this decision under the SDR standards. Access for proposed Parcel 2 will be addressed at time of Site Development Review for proposed construction on that lot. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This site is not within a 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 19 FINDING: Based on the analysis detailed in the criteria abov,, staff finds that the Special Provisions for lots created through the partition process have been satisfied. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying a Site Development Review application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The existing lot is adjacent to residentially zoned and developed property to the west and to the north, across SW Park Street. After the partition, however, the proposed daycare will be adjacent to the newly created lot, thus, no buffering and screening is required between the property to the west and the daycare. When proposed Parcel 2 is developed, buffering on that lot will be necessary. Because the property to the north across the street from the proposed development is residentially zoned property, buffering shall be required. The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) says that when uses would be adjacent to one another, except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening shall be required. The buffer matrix requires a 20-foot-wide buffer between commercial and single-family residential uses. The plan submitted shows there will be 20 feet from the property line to the beginning of any portion of the structure. The buffer will be occupied by landscaping, fencing and bark chips. The landscaping proposed meets the quantity standards specified in Section 18.100.080.D.2 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The landscape plan submitted indicates the parking lot will be separated from SW Park Street by a five (5)-foot-wide landscape strip planted with Otto Luyken Laurel, Crimson Pygmy Barberry and 4 Norwegian Maple trees. Based on information provided in the Western Garden Book, the parking lot will be effectively screened. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 19 shrubbery and trees. , ees shall be planted in landsca�.:d islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As discussed above, the parking lot will be effectively screened. The landscape plan shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for approximately every seven (7) spaces in all areas except the center parking area. An additional tree is necessary in this area to comply with the standards. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has frontage on SW Park Street. The landscape plan indicates a total of nine (9) Norwegian Sunset Maples will be planted along the street approximately 30 feet apart, therefore, this criterion has been met. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The plans submitted indicate that 44% of the site will be landscaped, thus meeting the standard. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not provide for one (1) parking lot tree for every seven (7) parking spaces as discussed above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows a parking lot tree will be planted in the center parking area, this criteria will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan shows that the proposed sign location, a portion of a parking space and landscaping will be within the vision clearance triangle area. While landscaping may be permitted in this area, the applicant must provide verification that the proposed landscaping will meet the vision clearance requirements of clearance between three (3) feet and eight (8) NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 19 feet in height. The parking got location and sign will need to be ..,ucated so that they are not within the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because the site plan shows prohibited objects in the vision clearance triangle, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows no objects will be located between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height in the vision clearance area, these standards can be met CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, plantings, fences, or temporary or permanent obstruction between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the landscaping proposed meets the standards. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(B)(3) requires five (5) parking spaces plus one (1) space per classroom for daycare facilities. The site plan does not clearly indicate the number of classrooms, however, staff counted approximately 12 areas that could be used as class space, not including the pool area. Based on this estimation, 17 parking spaces are required. The plan provides for a total of 23 parking spaces. It appears that this standard has been met, however, prior to final site plan approval, the applicant must verify the number of classroom spaces in order to insure the required parking has been provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan and will not be located in any parking aisles, pedestrian ways or landscape areas, thus meeting this criteria. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the proposed structure does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standard does not apply. FINDING: The plan appears to provide for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces and off-street loading. Because the applicant did not indicate the number of classrooms proposed, and the parking requirement is based upon the number of classrooms, staff can not verify that this criterion has been satisfied. If the applicant indicates the number of classrooms provided will be 18 or less, the number of parking spaces proposed will meet the criteria. CONDITION: Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces that will be provided. NOTE: The parking layout may change based on the requirements to re-locate the proposed driveway (discussed further in this decision). If this layout changes, NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 19 • staff will ne,,.4 to review the proposed layout to 1,..,ure that it conforms to the TMC standards. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. 18.108.105 requires walkways between ground floor entrances to the streets which provide required access. There is one (1), 24-foot-wide access proposed. Staff has concerns, however, that the location of the driveway is too close to the existing intersection of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street. This is discussed in more detail in the Street and Utility Improvement Standards Section of this decision. A walkway is proposed between the building and SW Park Street, thus, meeting the standards. FINDING: Because the access width proposed meets the standards and because the location will be discussed and conditioned further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. The site plan shows the location of a proposed sign, however, the approval of the sign and location is through a separate sign permit process administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no existing trees on the parcel where the daycare is proposed. Therefore, no trees will be removed as a result of this development. FINDING: Because there are no trees on the parcel being reviewed for development approval, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of the intersection of SW Grant Street. Southwest Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on SW Park Street in this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 19 • The roadway is paved, .c not fully improved adjacent to t,... site. The roadway was improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of this site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the traffic impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of the daycare facility project on proposed Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of the half-street improvements adjacent to proposed Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur that improvements adjacent to proposed Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of proposed Parcel 2 is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City would be necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the daycare facility on Proposed Parcel 1. Staff is concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is very close (within 35 feet) to the intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempts to avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on opposite sides of the street. In addition, the parcel just east of this site (Hot `n Now) was conditioned as a part of SDR 93-0012 to provide an access easement to this parcel. The Hot `n Now site currently has a driveway that aligns with SW Grant Street; this driveway is restricted to encourage traffic to turn right out of the site. A "Right-Turn Only" sign is present, along with a small concrete island. It should be noted that the City did not require Hot `n Now to physically construct a driveway connection to this site; only an easement was required to allow for the possibility of a shared access. Staff considered the possibility of requiring the applicant to redesign the site plan to utilize the Hot `n Now driveway. However, both City staff and ODOT staff have a concern with the close proximity of the Hot `n Now driveway to the signalized intersection at SW Pacific Highway. Southwest Pacific Highway is a very congested arterial roadway and the stacking of vehicles that occurs during peak hours at the intersection will make the Hot `n Now driveway very difficult, and potentially unsafe to use, particularly if vehicles are attempting a left turn from SW Park Street into the driveway. The combination of stacking cars on SW Park Street with vehicles desiring to turn left into the site will create more congestion at the signalized intersection. ODOT recommended that the driveway to this site be moved further to the west to provide additional separation from the SW Pacific Highway signal. City staff agrees. There is an existing gravel driveway for this site further west from the proposed driveway location that currently lines up well with an existing driveway serving Tax Lot 01700 on the north side of SW Park Street. The existing gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the SW Grant Street intersection and would be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts with the intersection of SW Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of SW Park Street. In addition, the separation from the SW Pacific Highway signalized intersection will be increased to 300 feet, which will satisfy ODOT and City concerns. This location would not conflict with the building location, but may necessitate a redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign, the alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant be required to locate the driveway for the daycare center at the existing gravel driveway location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 01700. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 19 Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing eight (8)-inch public water line located adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street. The applicant will need to apply for water service from the City. The Public Works Department will install the necessary water service(s). Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of proposed Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on- site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in SW Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in- lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 19 • foot of street frontage .dt contains the overhead lines. 1 ,.e frontage along this site (adjacent to proposed Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on proposed Parcel 1 would be $9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of proposed Parcel 2. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan as submitted does not fully meet the Street and Utility Improvement standards. If the applicant revises the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary improvements in compliance with Conditions of Approval 7-21 outlined in pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will be satisfied. CONDITION:Comply with Conditions of Approval 7-21 as outlined on pages 2-4 of this decision. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 1 , 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180 (Public Transit) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this Section: 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (Drainage), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans submitted show a six (6)-foot high wood dumpster enclosure will be provided towards the rear of the site. In order to meet the standards for collection of mixed solid waste and recyclables as discussed above, the applicant must provide verification from the franchise hauler that their disposal plan complies. The dumpster opening is not easily accessible for loading disposal vehicles and will likely be of concern to the hauler. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the proposed dumpster location and collection facility, this criterion will be met. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 19 CONDITION Submit a vY,.cten sign-off from the hauler that ,,sates the proposed trash enclosure will meet the standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no existing trees on the daycare site. The proposed building location will not significantly affect existing topography and natural drainage. Drainage requirements due to this development were discussed in detail on page 13 of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed building was planned with consideration of the natural and physical environment and will not significantly affect topography or natural drainage, this standard has been satisfied. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. There will be play areas between the street and the structure which could result in an increase in noise for the residential uses across the street. As required earlier in this decision, buffering will be provided using shrubs, trees and fencing, thus satisfying this criteria. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and indicated that a lighting plan is needed for review. They further commented that for crime deterrent purposes, the parking area should have some surveillance capability from traveling public on SW Park Street. While this may seem to contradict the parking lot screening standards, it in fact, does not. The parking lot screening is intended to be more of a visual buffer that a full sight obscuring screen. It is assumed, therefore, that the parking lot will still be visible for surveillance purposes. FINDING: Because a lighting plan was not provided, the Tigard Police Crime Prevention Officer was unable to comment on the effectiveness of lighting area vulnerable to crime. In order to satisfy this standard, submit a proposed lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.120.16 states that all facilities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS 487. Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1-25 parking spaces are provided. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 16 OF 19 • The proposal shows 2 ha.,,,Icapped access spaces with a shares., van accessible aisle. The plan shows the access ramp is in the aisle. Building Division Staff who enforce ADA requirements through the building plans review process have stated that this ramp must be outside of the access aisle (on the sidewalk). FINDING: Because the access aisle as shown does not meet the ADA requirements, this standards has not been met. If the applicant submits revised plans that show the access ramp is not located within the aisle, this standard will be satisfied. CONDITION: Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as Children's Daycare. Code Section 18.62.030 lists Children's Daycare as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Criteria: Section 18.62 states that the required setbacks in the C-G zone are: 0-foot front yard (although there are buffer requirements for this site), 0 foot rear yard, except where abutting residential and 0 foot side yard, except where abutting residential. The proposed daycare site does not abut residential property except to the north, therefore, the building location meets the dimensional standards of the Code. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed and a hydrant flow test must be completed. The covered porch is considered part of the building square footage for Uniform Building Code (UBC) purposes, therefore, if it is between 20 feet and 10 feet of the parking lot, it must be one hour fire resistant construction. If the porch is less than 10 feet from the property line, it can not have unprotected openings. This would not be permitted because it would violate buffer requirements. The Building Division also reviews applications for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. In regard to compliance with these standards, it appears that there are some minor revisions that will be necessary prior to obtaining building permits. These changes include: providing access through the chain link fence along SW Park Street for fire personnel and revising the fence location in the rear of the site to provide enough room for fire fighting personnel to maneuver. These requirements are mentioned in order to assist the applicant in submittal of the building plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this approval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. Additional Building Division comments which resulted in a condition of approval have been incorporated into the body of this decision. Please refer questions regarding the comments from the Building Division to Jim Funk, Commercial Building Plans Examiner. The City of Tigard Police Department has offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 17 OF 19 • The City of Tigard 0i—rations Manager has reviewed L„z proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a 1" water meter is required along with a minimum of a double check valve device assembly (backflow prevention device). They have also indicated that all portions of the proposed building must be within 250 feet of a fire hydrant as measured through accessible driving surfaces. This will be reviewed at time of building permits and additional fire hydrant will be required if necessary. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and proved comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), PGE, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and offered no comments or objections. ODOT was notified of the proposal and provided comments which have been incorporated into this decision. GTE was notified and indicated that the developer/owner must place conduits to GTE specifications. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY-MARCH 16, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 18 OF 19 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MARCH 16, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . /11/ March 6, 1998 PREPARE /1 Y: Julia Hajduk ' DATE Associate PI'.nner March 6, 1998 APPROVED BY: RiCFard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager i s\c u rp l n\J u l i a\s d r\d a yc a re.d o c NOTICE OF"AMENDED"DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 19 OF 19 . r 4Z iA\ \�\` Z y\ 0 6d V3 A7\ — y._._—___ (-S.W.PARK STREETS 2 litt Si'04 4 a i,ct , PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 I Q AREA=I41567 SQ.FT. N �� AREA=27;936 SQ.FT I � LL ifOeme <eti irlAY AREA o . 1.1 Q / • ._ •♦°'•.'♦ ♦•,iii a+♦�'•1•v+):::•9rt+'•i A 2' ,**+. ♦18:44+'aAVN i♦i.4::i': f ;.4,. EXISTING BUILDING 44,4* O Us } ' U PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE: 6,500 Sq. Ft CASE NOES)&CASE NAMUR %-- , i I SITE PLAN SOH 91-0011 MLP 91-0019 EXHIBIT MAP H CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE our IS NT T1 SCALD 1111_I • CITY of TIGARD I ■ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM '>> �' , • PLANNING DIVISION • ,• �, VICINITY' '� ♦ , VIC TY MAP ''°`�` rip +#.07,` SIv ` -ll ■ 4 . -r ■ '"Ara CHILDREN'S ELME 1111 ` I, DAY CARE CENTER 1 , • GT Er �i■■■■�IJ ∎ ♦4 .1111111111111111 II_ * ��., LL � oT �. ` ■ 1111 1 � �� • � offi ■�� 1111► - . ��• • ■ sur- � - ,■■■l $ : ' , O 11 !!IrAa,a* 4O.iii � II iULftII ■ t**it■ 1111■■■:■ ■ �i I4—.*** *� vii ■�■ , . � 1111■■■ on Iti III 1111111111111tajW ♦ • CJ� , 0 200 400 800 Feat 1, ,._.831aet • ■�r■■■■� ya��! ►� `► rr 4 111111111111111111 �0 111 A � N PARK PL . �; l i ,■,■■' m MI■-1111140A4 ` City of Tigard ■■■,■,. ■ HILL VIEW ST ■ Sip - ■ Infamatlwl on mb may�.for general location only end — <VIEW CT should be verified with the Development Services DNbbn. IiiiirMISAI ■ , 13125 SW NM BNd ■■ ■� :III • Tlp.rd,OR 97723♦i (503)839.4,7,1111•..F S ■■.. �■■■ IlInt■ _.-_•� ne�J/www.d.tipsrd.a.w Community Development Plot date:Jan 14, 1998;c:lmagiclmagicdd.apr �n -if- i 1/Ivi Lp `1 fi t✓o,`' +ti L-Oki/kS VI LLh((C JJrt? L (fy i oI-a{) "/sm,' 12cea'si�p'i 2S102CB-00302 2S102CB-01100 EXHIBIT A. QAYUM ABDUL AND ISMAT O'CONNOR STEPHEN C 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 13150 SW GRANT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01200 2S102CB-01300 HESS DAVID A&GAIL K LEFEVRE REBECCA J 13170 SW GRANT AVE 208 MOCKINGBIRD CIRCLE TIGARD,OR 97223 SANTA ROSA, CA 95405 2S102CB-01500 2S102CB-01600 DURDEL CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L EASTERLY JOSEPH H G&TONIA 10425 SW PARK ST 10395 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01700 2S102CB-01800 KIMMEL KRISTA L PUBLIC STORAGE 10365 SW PARK STREET PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S 102CB-01802 2S 102CB-01804 BARUCH ISAAC TRUSTEE TACO BELL CORP#06-578 1333 THIRD AVE 17901 VON KARMAN SEATTLE,WA 98101 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-01805 2S102CB-01900 HARRIS ENTERPRISE • TBLD CORP 17901 V.' _ + •N 17901 VON KARMAN 1E,CA 92714 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-06801 2S102CB-06900 HESS PHILIP JOSEPH LIM LAI HENG AND 10475 SW PARK ST 10467 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-07100 2S102CB-07200 NGUYEN MY DUNG ANNA&HAI M AULD SANDRA A 10453 SW PARK ST 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00500 2S103DA-00600 HEPPNER SELMA W MEYER DUANE FRANCIS 359 SW 5TH ST 13210 SW WATKINS AVE DUNDEE, OR 97115 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00700 2S103DA-00800 HATCH JAMES S/MARCIEL J& BRADEN ROBERT W& KATHLEEN J 13205 SW WATKINS 13175 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 s m R 97--a 17//vttP '7-oo 9 cH-it.D. VS V/cum 0 nfli CI /e civ`7- 064, a6F ) noryunied2RAvi 2S103DA-04600 25103DA-04700 TROSEN DAVID S/LEANNA M URL JOY B 10570 SW PARK ST 13370 SW TIGARD,OR 97223 D,OR 97223 2S103DA-04701 2S103DA-04702 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 17901 VON KARMAN 4114 SW FLOWER ST IRVINE,CA 92714 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103DA-04800 2S103DA-04900 URL JOY B MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& 13370 SW WATKINS 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06100 HARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. PAPEN CINDY&DAN 2300 SW 1ST AVENUE, SUITE 104 13450 SW WATKINS ST PORTLAND OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 WATER LEAF ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS 621 SW MORRISON STREET, SUITE 125 PORTLAND OR 97205 f , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Of TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community S7,Ae11.L. OE°REGO ON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: IG,.ek/AyprWnal.Bmy.)B.bwl u NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: �SDk q--�"0 nir_ ,q� CA'c ' - " A id i / /7 �,,;.�_`1 at (4,re67irk , AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) / LI City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: i I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File N /Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council I ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ' I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE ( ■le No/Name Reference) (Date dPublic Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FOR: 7 I I ;,Type'Kind of NOt■el (File No/Name Re'erence) (Date of Public Heanng,dapplicace) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEESI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was jailed to ea am 9d person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exh1bR"B" ril + - ) day,of - (z- 2u¢2v� 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the dal of ' 1998,postage prepaid. c / I ),1, .,e6e ,- t .(cf77/' (Person that Prepa•-• Notice) 7\77-6--- Yd.Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the l day of �/7�' 19 f r OFFICIAL SEAL / / a DIANE M JELDERKS / , /' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON _L. . L ... . � COMMISSION NO 0461x2 NOTARY PUBLIC OF ORE r I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 My Commission Expires: Z 7 NUT NOTICE OF DECISION 44 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 91-0011/ . MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 91-0019 OF ni D pment CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Shaping A Better Community SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain SDR approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel (Parcel 1 on proposed partition). APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Submit a revised landscaping plan for review by the Planning Division that shows the location of the parking lots trees to be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Staff Contact: Julia Hajduk (503-639-4171). 2. Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, planting, fences, or temporary or permanent obstructions between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the proposed landscaping meets the standards of the code. 3. Provide written solid waste hauler approval of facility location and equipment compatibility. The location of the dumpster opening must be relocated to make it more accessible to garbage haulers. 4. Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces provided so that staff can confirm that the required parking spaces have been provided. 5. Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. 6. Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. 7. Submit the Final Plat Application for the Partition. Final Plat Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review, three (3) paper copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington County and by the City of Tigard. C. Once the City and County have reviewed the plat, submit two (2) mylar copies of the partition plat for the City Engineer's signature. 8. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit for Parcel 1 , the applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat. 9. Obtain a public improvement permit and compliance agreement for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at Tigard City Hall. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 2 OF 18 "10. As a part of th., public improvement plan submiti,., provide the Engineering • Department with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 11 . Provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW Park Street adjacent to Parcel 1 . The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 20 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. curb or curb and gutter; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street striping; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; I. driveway apron; and J. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Park Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 13. Provide a profile of SW Park Street, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 14. Construct the driveway for the daycare facility on Parcel 1 where the current gravel driveway into the site is located and align with the existing driveway that serves Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of SW Park Street. 15. Submit a revised parking lot plan in relation to the re-located drive. Staff contact : Julia Hajduk, Planning Division. 16. Apply for water service(s) from the City prior to construction. 17. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. 18. Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." ThE FOL GWING COND ONS SHA B a EIQ NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 3 OF 18 • 19. Complete the requi.ed public improvements, obtain coriwuional acceptance from the City, and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 20. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand- drawn, then a diskette is not required. 21 . Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street underground as a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $9,075. 22. Construct all site improvements as per the approved site plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: No development applications related to this tax lot were found to have been previously filed with the City of Tigard. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located on SW Park Street between Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue. The site is identified as WCTM 2S103CB, Tax Lot 01805. The site is bordered to the south and west by property zoned General Commercial (C-G). The property to the east is zoned R-3.5 and the property to the north, across SW Park Street, is zoned R-4.5. The properties on all sides are developed consistent with their zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is relatively flat, with no significant vegetation other than grasses. The site is currently vacant. The proposal is to partition the lot into two (2) parcels. The eastern most parcel (Parcel 1) will be 27,936 square feet and will be developed with a 6,500 square foot daycare center facility. The western most parcel (Parcel 2) will be 14,567 square feet and is not proposed to be developed at this time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 4 OF 18 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements on SW Park Street. The Engineering Department has estimated the cost of the half-street improvements to be approximately $200 per lineal foot. This conservative estimate was determined from current bid tabulations. Assuming a cost of $200 per lineal foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the half-street improvements along the portion of the parcel to be developed with a daycare facility on SW Park Street is $65,916 (329.58 feet x $200). The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure fee that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street systems. Upon obtaining a building permit, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $23,862. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $74,568 ($23,862 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial system. Since the TIF paid is $23,862, the unmitigated impact can be valued at approximately $50,706 impact on the collector and arterial systems. The rough proportionality test means that the conditions imposed must be "roughly proportional" to the impacts associated with a development. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs (in this case, the street improvements) required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. Further more, Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. In order for the street system to function to serve all properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. Although the requirements imposed have a slightly higher estimated value than the unmitigated impact, the City finds that the conditions meet the rough proportionality test. There is unmeasured impacts on nearby local streets which adds to the unmitigated cost. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR LAND PARTITIONS: Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 5 OF 18 • 'The proposal conforms ..rth the City's Comprehensive Plar,, The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that the newly created lot will continue to allow for commercial development. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated both by the analysis presented within this administrative decision, and by the application and review process. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; Adequate public facilities are, or will be conditioned to be, available to serve the proposal and will be constructed to meet City standards. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and The proposal complies, or will be conditioned to comply, with the lot size and dimensional requirements. This is discussed in detail in SPECIAL PROVISIONS, pages 6 and 7 All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 83-52). The public facilities and proposed improvements are, or will be conditioned to be, in compliance with City standards. The actual improvement requirements for each proposed parcel is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Staff finds that the criteria above have been met outright or will be met as a result of conditions imposed in this decision in further sections. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 18.162.050 contains the following special provisions for lots created through the Partition Process: Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The average minimum lot width for the C-G zone is 50 feet. The plan submitted shows Parcel 1 with a width of approximately 158 feet and Parcel 2 with an average width of approximately 303 feet, thus meeting the criteria. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. There is no minimum lot area requirement in the C-G zone, therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 6 OF 18 Lot Frontage: Each lot Bated through the partition processhall front a public right- of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. Both parcels have adequate access and frontage on SW Park street, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. Both proposed lots are currently vacant. The daycare on Parcel 1 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks further in this decision. Any structures placed on Parcel 2 will be reviewed for compliance with setbacks at the time of Site Development Review. Front Yard Determination for Flaq Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. The proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Screening on Flaq Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. This proposal does not involve a flag lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. Both parcels have direct access to SW Park Street, a public street. There is a fire hydrant at the corner of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street and another one at the corner of SW Park Street and SW Watkins Avenue. Both existing fire hydrants are within close proximity to the site, however, due to the large frontage of the site (approximately 488 feet), an additional fire hydrant may be required. Fire protection requirements for the daycare are discussed further in this decision under the Building Divisions comments. Fire protection for Parcel 2 will be reviewed at time of Site Development Review. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The partition does not require the use or creation of a common drive, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 7 OF 18 • • Accessway: Any acce„�way shall comply with the stagy._ _Ads set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 18.108.040 requires that all vehicular access and egress connect directly with a public or private street and the vehicular access be located within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances for commercial uses. Access for Parcel 1 will be addressed further in this decision under the SDR standards. Access for Parcel 2 will be addressed at time of Site Development Review for proposed construction on that lot. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. This site is not within a 100-year floodplain, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis detailed in the criteria above, staff finds that the Special Provisions for lots created through the partition process have been satisfied. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying a Site Development Review application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120), Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The existing lot is adjacent to residentially zoned and developed property to the west and to the north, across SW Park Street. After the partition, however, the proposed daycare will be adjacent to the newly created lot, thus, no buffering and screening is required between the property to the west and the daycare. When Parcel 2 is developed, buffering on that lot will be necessary. Because the property to the north across the street from the proposed development is residentially zoned property, buffering shall be required. The Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) says that when uses would be adjacent to one another, except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening shall be required. The buffer matrix requires a 20-foot-wide buffer between commercial and single-family residential uses. The plan submitted shows there will be 20 feet from the property line to the beginning of any NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 8 OF 18 • *portion of the structure. I pie buffer will be occupied by landscaping, fencing and bark chips. The landscaping proposed meets the quantity standards specified in Section 18.100.080.D.2 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC). Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The landscape plan submitted indicates the parking lot will be separated from SW Park Street by a five (5)-foot-wide landscape strip planted with Otto Luyken Laurel, Crimson Pygmy Barberry and 4 Norwegian Maple trees. Based on information provided in the Western Garden Book, the parking lot will be effectively screened. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As discussed above, the parking lot will be effectively screened. The landscape plan shows parking lot trees will be planted with one (1) for approximately every seven (7) spaces in all areas except the center parking area. An additional tree is necessary in this area to comply with the standards. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has frontage on SW Park Street. The landscape plan indicates a total of nine (9) Norwegian Sunset Maples will be planted along the street approximately 30 feet apart, therefore, this criterion has been met. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The plans submitted indicate that 44% of the site will be landscaped, thus meeting the standard. FINDING: Because the landscape plan does not provide for one (1) parking lot tree for every seven (7) parking spaces as discussed above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows a parking lot tree will be planted in the center parking area, this criteria will be met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 9 OF 18 CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows pair Ong lot trees will be planted with one (1) for every seven (7) spaces. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plan shows that the proposed sign location, a portion of a parking space and landscaping will be within the vision clearance triangle area. While landscaping may be permitted in this area, the applicant must provide verification that the proposed landscaping will meet the vision clearance requirements of clearance between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. The parking lot location and sign will need to be relocated so that they are not within the vision clearance area. FINDING: Because the site plan shows prohibited objects in the vision clearance triangle, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that shows no objects will be located between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height in the vision clearance area, these standards can be met CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that shows the vision clearance triangle will be clear of all vehicles, hedges, plantings, fences, or temporary or permanent obstruction between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet in height. Submit verification from the landscape architect that the landscaping proposed meets the standards. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(B)(3) requires five (5) parking spaces plus one (1) space per classroom for daycare facilities. The site plan does not clearly indicate the number of classrooms, however, staff counted approximately 12 areas that could be used as class space, not including the pool area. Based on this estimation, 17 parking spaces are required. The plan provides for a total of 23 parking spaces. It appears that this standard has been met, however, prior to final site plan approval, the applicant must verify the number of classroom spaces in order to insure the required parking has been provided. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan and will not be located in any parking aisles, pedestrian ways or landscape areas, thus meeting this criteria. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 10 OF 18 • • Off-Street Loading Spa .es: Section 18.106.080 requires ...gat every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the proposed structure does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standard does not apply. FINDING: The plan appears to provide for the required vehicle parking spaces, bicycle parking spaces and off-street loading. Because the applicant did not indicate the number of classrooms proposed, and the parking requirement is based upon the number of classrooms, staff can not verify that this criterion has been satisfied. If the applicant indicates the number of classrooms provided will be 18 or less, the number of parking spaces proposed will meet the criteria. CONDITION: Submit verification of the number of classroom spaces that will be provided. NOTE: The parking layout may change based on the requirements to re-locate the proposed driveway (discussed further in this decision). If this layout changes, staff will need to review the proposed layout to insure that it conforms to the TMC standards. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. 18.108.105 requires walkways between ground floor entrances to the streets which provide required access. There is one (1), 24-foot-wide access proposed. Staff has concerns, however, that the location of the driveway is too close to the existing intersection of SW Grant Avenue and SW Park Street. This is discussed in more detail in the Street and Utility Improvement Standards Section of this decision. A walkway is proposed between the building and Park Street, thus, meeting the standards. FINDING: Because the access width proposed meets the standards and because the location will be discussed and conditioned further in this decision, this standard has been satisfied. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zone. The site plan shows the location of a proposed sign, however, the approval of the sign and location is through a separate sign permit process administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 11 OF 18 • • removal over 12 inches caliper, which trees are to be rc- _.,ved, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no existing trees on the parcel proposed for the daycare, therefore, no trees will be removed as a result of this development. FINDING: Because there are no trees on the parcel being reviewed for development approval, this criterion has been met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164) Streets: This site lies adjacent to the south edge of SW Park Street and is just west of the intersection of Grant Street. Park Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan Map. A minor collector street requires a 60-foot right-of-way (ROW) for ultimate improvement. At present, there is 60 feet of ROW on Park Street in this vicinity. Therefore, no additional ROW dedications are necessary. The roadway is paved, but not fully improved adjacent to this site. The roadway was improved on the south side as a part of development of the parcel immediately east of this site (Hot `n Now site). The applicant has indicated that they will help mitigate the traffic impact of this development by constructing a half-street improvement as a part of the daycare facility project on Parcel 1. The applicant does not propose construction of the half-street improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 at this time. Staff would concur that improvements adjacent to Parcel 2 could wait until such time that development of Parcel 2 is proposed. At that time, a separate site development review by the City would be necessary and the half-street improvements could then be required. The applicant is proposing one driveway to serve the daycare facility on Parcel 1 . Staff is concerned about the location of the driveway, as it is very close (within 35 feet) to the intersection of SW Grant Street. On collector and arterial streets, the City attempts to avoid turning movement conflicts near intersections and also with driveways on opposite sides of the street. There is an existing gravel driveway for this site further west from the proposed driveway location. The existing gravel driveway currently lines up well with an existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700 on the north side of Park Street. The existing gravel driveway is approximately 115 feet west of the Grant Street intersection and would be a much better location for the site access by avoiding turning movement conflicts with the intersection of Grant Street and with the existing driveway on the north side of Park Street. This location would not conflict with the building location, but would necessitate a redesign of the parking layout by the applicant. It appears that with minimal redesign, the alternate driveway location would work well. Therefore, Staff recommends the applicant be required to locate the driveway for the daycare center at the existing gravel driveway location to align with the existing driveway serving Tax Lot 1700. Water: This site will be served from the City's water system. There is an existing 8-inch public water line located adjacent to the south edge of Park Street. The applicant will need to apply for water service from the City and the Public Works department will install the necessary water service(s). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 12 OF 18 • Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses the eastern portion of Parcel 1 within a 15-foot wide public sewer easement. This public sewer line also runs adjacent to the south boundary of this site within a public easement. The applicant's plans do not indicate where the proposed sewer service will connect into the public system. The applicant's public improvement drawings will also need to show the proposed connection into the public sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls primarily to the north and east. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) submitted comments indicating that a sensitive area in the form of a perennial stream may be located on this site. By USA definition, in their Design and Construction Standards, a perennial stream carries year round flows. Staff visited this site in February, 1997 and did not find a perennial stream and it appears that any previous channel to the south of this site has long since been filled and redirected into private storm facilities. Therefore, Staff finds that there are no sensitive areas on this site. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how this site will be drained, but it appears the on- site runoff will be directed into the new storm line that will be constructed as a part of the street improvements in Park Street. Prior to issuance of permits on this project, a final storm drainage design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. However, the standards provide an exception for sites that are small and where constructing a water quality facility would be impractical. Staff believes that there is not ample space on this site for a water quality facility and the fee in- lieu of constructing a facility should be required. The fee is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Park Street adjacent to this site. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site (adjacent to Parcel 1 only) is 330 lineal feet; therefore the fee for the development on Parcel 1 would be $9,075.00 and payable prior to final building inspection. A similar requirement will be placed upon future development of Parcel 2. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 13 OF 18 FINDING: Based on ti ie analysis above, the site plan as .,mitted does not fully meet the Street and Utility Improvement standards. If the applicant revises the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary improvements in compliance with Conditions of Approval 7-21 outlined in pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will be satisfied. CONDITION:Comply with Conditions of Approval 7-21 as outlined on pages 2-4 of this decision. Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 1 , 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180 (Public Transit) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this Section: 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (Drainage), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans submitted show a six (6)-foot high wood dumpster enclosure will be provided towards the rear of the site. In order to meet the standards for collection of mixed solid waste and recyclables as discussed above, the applicant must provide verification from the franchise hauler that their disposal plan complies. The dumpster opening is not easily accessible for loading disposal vehicles and will likely be of concern to the hauler. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the hauler regarding the proposed dumpster location and collection facility, this criterion will be met. CONDITION Submit a written sign-off from the hauler that states the proposed trash enclosure will meet the standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 14 OF 18 • Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: ...action 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. There are no existing trees on the daycare site. The proposed building location will not significantly affect existing topography and natural drainage. Drainage requirements due to this development were discussed in detail on page 13 of this decision. FINDING: Because the proposed building was planned with consideration of the natural and physical environment and will not significantly affect topography or natural drainage, this standard has been satisfied. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. There will be play areas between the street and the structure which could result in an increase in noise for the residential uses across the street. As required earlier in this decision, buffering will be provided using shrubs, trees and fencing, thus satisfying this criteria. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and indicated that a lighting plan is needed for review. They further commented that for crime deterrent purposes, the parking area should have some surveillance capability from traveling public on SW Park Street. While this may seem to contradict the parking lot screening standards, it in fact, does not. The parking lot screening is intended to be more of a visual buffer that a full sight obscuring screen. It is assumed, therefore, that the parking lot will still be visible for surveillance purposes. FINDING: Because a lighting plan was not provided, the Tigard Police Crime Prevention Officer was unable to comment on the effectiveness of lighting area vulnerable to crime. In order to satisfy this standard, submit a proposed lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for review by Jim Wolf, Crime Prevention Officer. Staff contact, Julia Hajduk. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.120.16 states that all facilities for the handicapped shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS 487. Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1-25 parking spaces are provided. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 15 OF 18 • The proposal shows 2 hat.dicapped access spaces with a shatu van accessible aisle. The plan shows the access ramp is in the aisle. Building Division Staff who enforce ADA requirements through the building plans review process have stated that this ramp must be outside of the access aisle (on the sidewalk). FINDING: Because the access aisle as shown does not meet the ADA requirements, this standards has not been met. If the applicant submits revised plans that show the access ramp is not located within the aisle, this standard will be satisfied. CONDITION: Submit revised plans that show the access ramp is outside of the aisle. Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center. This use is classified in Code Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as Children's Daycare. Code Section 18.62.030 lists Children's Daycare as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Criteria: Section 18.62 states that the required setbacks in the C-G zone are: 0-foot front yard (although there are buffer requirements for this site), 0 foot rear yard, except where abutting residential and 0 foot side yard, except where abutting residential. The proposed daycare site does not abut residential property except to the north, therefore, the building location meets the dimensional standards of the Code. FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, this criterion has been met. SECTION V: AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and indicated that in order to provide required fire flow, an additional fire hydrant may be needed and a hydrant flow test must be completed. The covered porch is considered part of the building square footage for Uniform Building Code (UBC) purposes, therefore, if it is between 20 feet and 10 feet of the parking lot, it must be one hour fire resistant construction. If the porch is less than 10 feet from the property line, it can not have unprotected openings. This would not be permitted because it would violate buffer requirements. The Building Division also reviews applications for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. In regard to compliance with these standards, it appears that there are some minor revisions that will be necessary prior to obtaining building permits. These changes include: providing access through the chain link fence along SW Park Street for fire personnel and revising the fence location in the rear of the site to provide enough room for fire fighting personnel to maneuver. These requirements are mentioned in order to assist the applicant in submittal of the building plans. The requirements will not be required as part of this approval, but will be required as part of the building permit review. Additional Building Division comments which resulted in a condition of approval have been incorporated into the body of this decision. Please refer questions regarding the comments from the Building Division to Jim Funk, Commercial Building Plans Examiner. The City of Tigard Police Department has offered comments which have been incorporated into this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and have no objections. They have, however, stated that a 1" water meter is required along with a minimum of a double check valve device assembly (backflow prevention device). They have also indicated that all portions of the proposed building must be within 250 feet of a fire hydrant as measured through accessible driving surfaces. This will be reviewed at time of building permits and additional fire hydrant will be required if necessary. Compliance with backflow prevention will be required during the building permit process. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and proved comments which have been incorporated into this decision. Tualatin Valley Water Department (TVWD), PGE, NW Natural gas and Tri-met were notified of the proposal and offered no comments or objections. ODOT was notified of the proposal and provided comments which have been incorporated into this decision. GTE was notified and indicated that the developer/owner must place conduits to GTE specifications. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 17 OF 18 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON MARCH 11, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . A/i'�liy"e February 26, 1998 PREPAR BY: Julia H jduk DATE Associate Planner _ `'L ?UOJ February 26, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i lcurpin\Julia\sdr\daycare.doc NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019-CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER PAGE 18 OF 18 • I " . • ..�.,z ,,.„...e. ..._ :R- .•., err► ,.,.,...�+ , „ .. �, .r 4': Z it\ \\it\ Z O U) ti)\ 0 Z_ -- FS.W.PARK STREET4 -- = - __-- z _ _ z c� PARCEL 2 CL 1O PARCELI ARE A=14,567 SQ.FT. Q R AREA=27,936 S0.FL 1 � [\\PLAY a ft +h AREA r C� I .- n \\\\\\\\ � _ 0 i. ♦. :::"4•44.,♦ �•;♦ •R ♦ ♦ 1'tea•*'s *♦♦ •:••• EXISTING_„UILDING �; * 0 ',,r x'` >- U ' 1 PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE: 6,500 Su. a CASE NOM]&CASE NAMUR SITE PLAN SDR 97-0017 MLP 97-0019 EXHIBIT MAP N CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE . our is USTn$C*LO huRl m.■ oft: ,' '' — . — CITY of TIGAR E"4" i ••11. . GEOGRAPHIC INi DA YATION iY.TEY >>,� �♦ �' ,� , PLANNING DIVISION lin ' '� , ♦ ,ot VICINITY M . • '� ♦ ■r,''���` ■ ♦ ♦ ,` SDR 9T-0017 `�` .� IllitiSiN ` , MLP 97-0019 r � CHILDREN'S VILLAGE , DAr CARE CENTER�■■■■■� IIIMIL i.. 4'•• °°T11 fir. mmulacesti �i�i. . .go s `i�'� . .T I iii '_ 11111■ . 0 I '1 IT IIINI en • ‘ 11 gq4)r INArAtausm • II ■mnami .i r � �*1 311111111 1 tvv*;*oppowiti ♦ 0 200 400 000 Font ■ . � 1'•483 feet 11.1111111■111 - PIA*.** :., PARK PL 1�A101111111 Viii�♦ . ';""i■1■.' �1,1" ■.,, '. ` ('it t Tigxni,1111,,,. ■ HILL VIEW ST • Inform.0on on this map w for general we.twn onyand IIi - I e wn. 5 17 .` Tlpeid.OR 9,225 (505)059 ,,,■■. ..F — IP-■ENIE D M■ L _ 1. ��.� h ttp�AvwNd0p.n,.orus Community Development Plot date:Jan 14, 1998;c:lmagiclmaglcdd.apr sIA 91 ct,7/MAP '1 o,a c i upe,5kis Vey chog (pj / of-a) 2S102CB-00302 2S102CB-01100 EXHIBIT B. QAYUM ABDUL AND ISMAT O'CONNOR STEPHEN C 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 13150 SW GRANT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01200 2S102CB-01300 HESS DAVID A&GAIL K LEFEVRE REBECCA J 13170 SW GRANT AVE 208 MOCKINGBIRD CIRCLE TIGARD,OR 97223 SANTA ROSA,CA 95405 2S102CB-01500 2S102CB-01600 DURDEL CHRISTOPHER C&MARGO L EASTERLY JOSEPH H G&TONIA 10425 SW PARK ST 10395 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01700 2S102CB-01800 KIMMEL KRISTA L PUBLIC STORAGE 10365 SW PARK STREET PO BOX 25025 TIGARD,OR 97223 GLENDALE,CA 91201 2S102CB-01802 2S102CB-01804 BARUCH ISAAC TRUSTEE TACO BELL CORP#06-578 1333 THIRD AVE 17901 VON KARMAN SEATTLE,WA 98101 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-01805 2S102CB-01900 HARRIS ENTERPRISE TBLD CORP 17901 V N 17901 VON KARMAN E,CA 92714 IRVINE,CA 92714 2S102CB-06801 2S102CB-06900 HESS PHILIP JOSEPH LIM LAI HENG AND 10475 SW PARK ST 10467 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-07100 2S102CB-07200 NGUYEN MY DUNG ANNA&HAI M AULD SANDRA A 10453 SW PARK ST 10441 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00500 2S103DA-00600 HEPPNER SELMA W MEYER DUANE FRANCIS 359 SW 5TH ST 13210 SW WATKINS AVE DUNDEE,OR 97115 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-00700 2S103DA-00800 HATCH JAMES S/MARCIEL J& BRADEN ROBERT W&KATHLEEN J 13205 SW WATKINS 13175 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 SD R. ` 7-C4 J7/iLrcp vicui-6e /)ty O 6 cw/ /) a -A 2S103DA-04600 2S103DA-04700 TROSEN DAVID S/LEANNA M URL JOY B 10570 SW PARK ST 13370 SW EtNS TIGARD,OR 97223 D,OR 97223 2S103DA-04701 2S103DA-04702 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 17901 VON KARMAN 4114 SW FLOWER ST IRVINE,CA 92714 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103DA-04800 25103DA-04900 URL JOY B MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& 13370 SW WATKINS 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06100 HARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. PAPEN CINDY& DAN 2300 SW 1ST AVENUE, SUITE 104 13450 SW WATKINS ST PORTLAND OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 WATER LEAF ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS 621 SW MORRISON STREET, SUITE 125 PORTLAND OR 97205 r. e !P I. 1V7 `,, COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 9 0 4 8 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]97-0017/ ❑ Tearsheet Notice MINOR LAND PARTITION[MP]97-0019 •C i ty of Tigard • >CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER< 13125 SW Hall Blvd . The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Minor 'Tigard ,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two(2)parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development 'Accounts Payable • Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the easternmost parcel.LOCATION:The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; '-: WCTM 2S 102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial Dis- - trict; C-G.The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a 1 combination of retail, service, wholesale,and repair services,or provide STATE OF OREGON, ) services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services,supply COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss• and equipment stores, vehicle sales,and drive-in restaurants to laundry es- tablishments,and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major col- 1, Katlay Snyder _ - — lector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community . being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, .•.>Director, or his principal clerk, of thfoi clard-Tua 1 atin Times 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 : and 193.020; published at Ti aryl - in the r aforesaid county and state; that the _SDR Children _s Vi 1 lag? nay Care CL! �f�� ri a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the "�j !`���ice' \` >`-f / `✓2,:''y ) entire issue of said newspaper for ONF successive and _ -�! \ ,i�, : e �' a � Y� :4-; consecutive in the following issues: •11 ' r I- �. I . --7.- A • 1 <> , \ '` , Februa.cy 26 , 1998 � ,`�j � •/� `y is J I. ■�► ,-�,,',,, 5,-'''''' fro. ;`rp,10.\\\\\��r , ..„,;, .. Kcd.--Ny in IA- „,, - ,._ f . i r • 4. .__J,iii"°"" Subscribed and sworn to efore me this26th day of Februa r 9-9& __.� ` . `� '1-■■-A -. ,7.A.-:i,” i 4......A, _ AIM r / In ------,." - :-- )- -/-*" 14 __ . r..*'."7, -NO PIA/Sit -- �- Not Public for Oregon c0rn' ass MY —� My Commissi i I COMM.- IH MOM- - AFFIDAVIT ' ; `r-._ -` nil 1!! ! 'I rill. I r..4t, \ 4.,,,,_ .,_ 4 t The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on March 11. 1998. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accor- dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Com- munity Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,March 11.1998. TT9048-Publish February 26, 1998. _ 4Irt■ ■ CITY of TIGARD �` GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM \ AREA NOTIFIED GRAN ... # CRY DELL CT CT I■ 00 SDR 97-0017 MLP 97-0019 M101B1 p 12CB 1, 01 among 2S10 CBO690 1 25102CB01300 : Children's Village 2510301100500 iS10 .B - 1 25102C80030 Day Care Center 2S 030110070010 00 2CB068 1 2. 02CB I 10 2S CB 1 600 PARK ST PARK _ __ ST 2S 03000602 251020801805 02080191 II DAI p I 2S 0301104700: 1 011' ,,;0 2S103DA04701 25102060181 25 030A0411111 COOK LN V 25102CB01800 $' 4 2S103D1106100 . 0200018'. QQ' 1 N LL= 0 100 200 300 Feet 1' 1'�233 feet 0 ST City aTigard Il 0 l'i- Information an this map is for general location ony and should be verified with the Development Services Division. LOA 13125 SW Hall .or. Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 httpJgard.O.tlgar 223 Community Development Plot date:Jan 14,1998;c:lmagiclmagicdd.apr APPLICANT MATERIALS 6.1jiri114.+dlc..-vltIz-17,9 I SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW > 4II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: -SJI-14 t4 ' t -'K DATE OF PRE-APP.: $t-'( Z.411 lefell Property Address/Location(s): Y -4 lore/ Tkc A'v-V FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): OA? 2`7 " 2 G C" Case No.(s): 56‘q — I 'C-A-NC ,ro-c 18b5 Other Case No.(s): do C e 5 - evC 7 2 ,� 5 Receipt No.�'�- 3018t/ 51/0 Site Size: l / Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': 4A S ENTE`Q-PPt- -':, (>uL. Date: /0 I 7--4,.?— Address: 2300 \'"'ma . ko9 Phone: Z22 -K Zot City: Tes 42-T l.-kKp Zip: 111-0 1 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: wA-1-9f-.1GAc' J (fit-kkl-EG'CL* 4 0-13-,m\4._S Comp PIaNZone Designation: Address: (o2-\ i Mo S-A-S - li"` \2 5 Phone: 228-'161 1 I City: t�b�-cL-AN-1D Zip: Ti 2 65 / CIT Area: (ill >LC4 e 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Rev.4/21/97 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.doc must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY I Application Elements Submitted: The owners of record of the subject property request Site Er/ Application Form Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): CV Owner s Signature/Written Authorization 0' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed A- k�4r SCircoo El/ Site/Plot Plan y lr t=om too C.�-m.--142.03 — (#of copies based on pre-app check list) fl. r-R'S 6 PR-e5e-cc 1,-1- ^E)..s.i. - Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/1"x 11") (Y Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100.000) $ 800.00 ($100 000-5999,999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 l'$5/$10.000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. S (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • ^^a1 •.rtrte�' . II-0 :L• • • t• 1 • • . . 1 • =a• l=r / •• 1 • . 11 . •�: 1 :s• • • '11 •• y. ••, 1 • • -, pr • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this t ( , day of 6&Y , 1997 n Owner's Signature �L ^4\-vc11.'1_ Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 bcie",4.k 12-0 y7 1 LAND PARTITION APPLICATION - I� 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 CITY OF TIOARD GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ... L.)1-1A- DATE OF PRE-APP.: "Sus...Y Z'i t991 Property Address/Location(s): Sw ?MCA< A.ie r TlG„Me.:p FOR STAFF USE ONl-Y Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): $ As? 25 1 2.. c-e) Case No.(s). Cite Si7g. y 2- �j 0►-� SF Other Case No, s): `? d°�a Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': KICK- S Receipt No _ �- � t"�/ <• Address: 2-3D0 lbr Ave , 'e 104 Phone: 222 1+2°1 Application Accepted , City: Pv M-&D Zip: 9-124,1 Date: / - Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: P hone: ? « City: Zip: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: •When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant • must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written Recording Date and Number authorization. The owners) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Re,.araem OcispirtVrousbie4Vandportdr,4 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the su ubjert property request permission to allow a Land Partition to: - - - - - - --- REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS divide into into (total area) (#of parcels) containing 2-11 93m S.F . and l�t 5�-t S.F . ✓ Application Elements Submitted: (sq. ft or acres) (sq. ft. or acres) Er Application Form r L2" Owner's Signature/Written Authorization QIvL>G L l 2�1, °I 30 ��) l S rg_c>P (provide any additional information here) QV Title Transfer Instrument or teed ,1o� A -s►`( � CX. L Pf�o�Po D 0/Site/Plot copies Plan (#of copies based on pre-app che0+list) st1 L r i XS tUCt—�Dev M e -c (5F- ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") ❑ Applicants Statement -r .S AP?L1C-a.T1o1.1 . (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Zap G- C:1 ❑ Filing Fee $780.00 1 List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, far all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above reauest does notviolate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the applicaticn. SIGNATURES of ugh owner of the subject property. DATED this day of 19 Owner's Signature Owp s Signature EK) Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 140 CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS= 5/7/98 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 97-0017 MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 97-0019 FILE TITLE: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER APPLICANT: Water Leaf Architecture & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison Street, Suite 125 2300 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 (503) 228-7571 (503) 222-4201 REQUEST: A request for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel. LOCATION: The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. ZONE: General Commercial District; C-G. The purpose of the C-G Zoned areas is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale, and repair services, or provide services to the public ranging from automobile repair and services, supply and equipment stores, vehicle sales, and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.162 and 18.164. CIT AREA: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: Monday January 26,1998 X STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: Thursday February 19,1998 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION] VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPE PLAN X NARRATIVE X SITE PLAN X TREE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARBORIST REPORT OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407 SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 41 \. CITY OF TIGARD January 7, 1998 OREGON Rachel Silbert Water Leaf Architecture 621 SW Morrison #125 Portland, OR 97205 RE: Notice of Acceptance of Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0017 and Minor Land Partition (MLP97-0019) Dear Ms. Silbert: The City of Tigard has received your applications for Site Development Review and a Minor Land Partition on SW Park Avenue. After an inspection of the file and your submittal of some required information, staff finds that all necessary submittal information has been provided. This letter is to inform you that your application has been accepted as complete and we will begin reviewing your proposal. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning your application. Sincerely, /44/4:11/(--- ulia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpin\julia\sdr■dayschool.acc c: SDR 97-0017 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 12/09/97 17:17 5032421964 DEC. 9. 199 4:09P TI' METRO TITLE D N0.807 P.2/4• i ` a'.-s y' �' -%^�('i,4`t :',9'• 1;,rl't i{C .- ,1,� -r:' —_., t�+'•1.� ,--- ,,�T . - �/— _•_ ... .._- �.. _ �►�'.'�.a1�•�., ,i , 'T{ f dC�,: 'OP,'" 1+,r��evr •,..,• i t'�,:.�..� f; 'Tp'�.'":!,T+ I..• �,! • TICOA TITLE R �' "_ "�`, k'�,� / INSURANCE 91022483 i ' . '�' wa mtnaton County Until a change is requested, tax l,,' CI) i statements should be sent to: VESTING pi , D ' ° `' I t'' Ivy Harris Enterprises Inc. � 1776 SW Madi9on, Suite 300 a Portland, Oregon 97205 ii rr ) o TRUSTEE'S BARGAIN AND SALE DEED }oe N.. This Trustee's Bargain and Sale Deed is made and entered into by Ronald C.McMillan,in his Capacity as Trustee of Estate of Marketplace Development Corporation p rporation ("Grantor"), in favor of 1. R. 7arris Enterprises, Inc.,/1( Grantee ). WHEREAS, Marketplace Development Corporation ("Marketplace") is the debtor in a 'f proceeding under p g der Chapter 7 of the U. S. Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 389-33741-P7 in the United 1y1 !,-,.. Siatess Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon (the `Court"); and t. t WHEREAS, Ronald C. McMiIlan has been appointed as the Trustee of the estate of 'a++ • feu Marketplace, and is now acting in such capacity. �;Z.-'' ;:i g -'t NOW,THEREFORE, Grantor does hereby +~ f I :t ,1 y grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto Grantee the :a}'' K 1,-'i,. real property described in the attached Exhibit A (the "property-). ,leer ,. ` ' Grantor represents and warrants to Grantee that; (1) Grantor is the duly appointed, qualified -� { 4F .', ., and acting trustee of Marketplace's estate; (2)the Property is property of Marketplace's, J petty tplace's estate;(3)on ;1, t•' anuary 7, 1991, Grantor caused to be served on all persons claiming any interest in, lien or 4.,, '' ,k;g, P. enci mbrance on, or claim to tha Property and all other persons entitled to notice, including all t. c;x �1 creditors and the Internal Revenue Service, a motion for authority to sell property free and clear of } liens and notice of hearing thereon ("Motion")in which he described his proposal to sell the Property •err . • :'_� for S130,000.00 free and clear co:all interests, liens, encumbrances and claims("Sale"); (4) Grantor • a has complied with 11 U.S.C. §363 (b)(1) and (f) and Bankru tc Rule 6004 a and (c) with } • P Y ( ) ( ) respect 4..:+. I 1; t to the Sale; (5)no party has filed an objection to the Motion; (6) at a hearing on January 29, 1991 ;.---" • a' ':=;:ri +, and in an order entered February 6, 1991 ("Order"), the Court authorized Grantor to sell the Property ' .,r-.,. i.'il on the terms of the Motion; (7)no party has filed a motion to alter or amend or reconsider the Order, 44„-e,1,.• '" . ,;'9 r a notice of appeal of the Order, a motion to extend the time to appeal �' ';r pp�the Order, a motion for leave a �,,t ,,I, . to appeal the Order, or a motion to stay the Order; and (8)Grantor is authorized to sell the Property 7,•a:r• f1 ;( to Grantee free anu clear of all interests, liens, encumbrances or claims. re•:,,' ' . •",l ''•} The true and actual consideration for this deed and Grantor's conveyance of the Property is `1=' ,:i ;± ;'/ t'i Grantee is$130,000.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. ':i.1,1,...,::-,,` 1� 1,•', rl , ',',,1 ji• Page 1 -TRUSTEE'S DEED �"' `i Wit�� i FF, lip , 1 r r..ry•'r., .141-.1... '1+,,, r:. t ,1- .t•q�, A. w- .,....4.%.,k",4,,, e t �� '. ,• ' ., „..,.„.,,,,,,,:.,,T.„14-,, • ., l�leU �,, FF''{{tt"'777, ... ,, .. ;.4 A.,0;∎.,Y'. X_ j}1'C a • _ 1•I i, r '�' '�• ra �'r 1't'•,1 �M�4 a�°” tiX`•. � !, � �•''r+4'•.+Cr�w yl�dy,�.., !'� rr •r .i ,I..;s:.1,`i,.i •� ,'.;.'r,x �•,'.,ry �.,y. ' Fr '�j�' �''�'' !t'� �•ti�1 i'r 1\ !,1�,''`'X.� ° 'd. 'I i +•• r •.t t.,.r,,•t', r -v..t.�- I' rrlr ' , "•'•M Y. ; ,'.•%%(C,"v,1'. i e het•;,t,k,1-1: tY " -1„'! ,•:'..., ' . '.L a.yi` 'ati 9't1. Yt J'f�' $4f i��S'�' j'� .'I .pJ,�'M..'�.r :' l�' Z: • rr ";) , ,�•' J t, },f`h �.�w 77``C"`. f11e £L,.ry 1e!". • P • 0 'h•:,',.,,,,,.4;- ,i' '' . r•r ',t'ri j 1 ` :4I'7T':"y Y?' ''4 r r..0""T• 1_. .'� ?I`c,:.:. ,,, ,,41 '.i jt5" , '� '••�' .'r• ,i ' • I' I • ,• '1':elti li=4 t .� e''f 1 ''7i it;:!1.f�4au V,4.S:n'. f,:•::::'.fl'! l 'yi . .i,l t >!` t;°+.:,].,.t04,;��r• tt..GGy�f...,:i',ui"11 'PP. 1 i• a' �yi;t1'4•;'; .6T-!�r F,; :�•1,,. '�JF ' '. , 1,,: .. ir1,; ,�L:. „R•;.} Jly.•�_ 11 .� ' '"• t. ,�,}�^'.••'.1� ;, :' .°,1�f.n�':r `r,,T t,.••. 'tA> tt.','"i, or.�d�kl ii / t ' `:•. I,y't 4., ,�,..rY, ,I,vd, r ,,, .,r.. J-':�i 46 ,••':} �• r r a r' , 1:9,44,y.•/ • ,.4.4J{'.•i•,',....., n a,f�� ' r.e.,4 ,. -.�•+,: •� ' 'r• .•.y H,•.ti•h'., .1 .'% r !••5.', S' f•'alt'.?S1+.'-„...,.i.,.Ar.•;.,. '.1 ir.-. 1.,,M1 _ ;� - �• l i' ••t • {,',f:' •ir, �°''t,,,r.,r F�:'M:;• '"artt � �'�• ti'r {{•±t� �� t .•,. •• •�,t;,'t:N _ ,i „I..■, �.r ' N...,'.,',.,.,yY:�1'�Rw'�,t ,I�.'`•t,•,.r''rt 4 ,U�} °' ` � v�"', f� � ',..:..,..,,I,90,:..:� �• r�_,:-' ,.,:: •f •'y''�■-�',.:.'I'��' 1,. �a fir:, „ !'}^eft". �J' .�. ,y�, ik i.'4, 1�tC, +'',key .,.,.�;�, �•'}t�•w ' '' .' .~ ,�: r1+J•i' 1 , 4'0 2%1% :r1-.i R i '�1 .l'''l a°, r w.. .,..' ,., , 1, ,y', +fR�t;,r..v�.;qr:;y, f,��'�1F': 12/09/97 17: 18 5032421964 METRO TIT LE D T DEC. 9. 1997^ 4 10PMT' .. f��li • 17 F "; . �v5k4 4a• F r •� t�• .^ ,,, 7).1W., .r cei t , „�, �� �K++.+.ilwr .nw _ `,04 i fT�,_�f�;'�r�4' I r �1M,..,, ! ,'.r',, . , ,5 r, '^`' .o re 1 T ,+,. , I ,..1'-:,::',%„.,...',,,','.':".;4,-s:1'•, "t t t'.'" t Z '4'•+ a' ''" THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN i i INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONSS. s.. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROP TE C�OR OUN'I'Y • „ PLANNING DEPARTMEKT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. J y i ! IN WITNESS WHE1tEOp, Grantor has executed And acknowledged this instrument this Z7- • ,3 day of March, 1991, 1 � It is the intent of the parties that Tax Lot i :•,' � Lat X700 described in Parcel IV above be co /bed and a portion of Tax + � J as described in Parcels II and III above to formaonetTaxaLot identified ` + , as Tax Lot 1805. �� a '.nald C. McMillan, in his capacity as Trustee of the Estate of 1 ' ',;�, Marketplace Development Corporation r.• ;I•fli �'' STATE OP J. x, OREGON ) - i '' ) ss: I� ',," ' ,- ` County of Multnomah ) .��`� On this of. r l 19�L, i;',;-,,:'..:1,...::,v:.. } . , a C.McMillan, in his ca , personally appeared the abovc•gammed Ronald t,•,.' ti > capacity as Trustee of the Estate of Marketplace Developrrjent'Corporation"and `' r !! acnledged the foregoing insmt to be his voluntary act and deed. �'X7/,1 e„• <le •.e„ �`'�'' <• Notary c for np ., '' • o, , ' My Commission Expii , ;i_ , After Recording Return To: • y 11 ati: E p� ess Inc. r� , a., I 1776 SW Madison, suite 300 • �C' , +•I; Portlan , OregorS ( Page 2 TRUSTEE'S DEED ;;�:�_ , • f;,'ti ”•S'j•.'I y',•';'4t rr"i i. 5Fl�.c'S!h::!!",f ? d.-tw�i ArCYIa y,:. �•S r�' •. • � ' + - � •r-;..,..• .�� •<1.r �'h�'i�,':",i i•''�'�'�t ,:'i�ti�:'•�Yr"�..a�';p..�r:;�rY:R�.�'a:•r�x'��!.•,`'•.��� .. : ,.. '.'. .,•� - "•,p. 4-; .l L',`,? K.4:,', �.:.'•:,,'m.°, r:t;d"r.4'-�j°'-•4,i4!" OK�{4' j. ♦.'� . . .' ',,, ',1I• i...,1,,„;.„. .n•4 r •''� }”1 :.t+.C, 'a' �• Ir 3'•4'J` •"r:1F.rJn! '��rai°^'�'S'+; 'y,;r-i.. - ,. !:.• o,''�• •~ ,:'.•1 ° '.• 1{li .• • �w ,,✓,...�:{ '4I l .'`,1•i• •.j''1,y' i,I=:,ir•. •.• 'f '.• ' •1` (Y I,i?IY'•1 '`,•' ,'1 ''•••N,#.. '`,? ' mid,!aC-., �rPC c',`t.'f,.' J• '. �' �'' :.':: AAA r�'. G��'" 1 it ■ . 'i",:•'.., M' 1?r ''r.;•!N'' •+d.%. ' ieti:.'v„,,ri.:t�`•C, 37„ ;..y.'•�aa'• '`i :. ,. :a•, !tp. ti .I•,,Y�1,' .•;r, jp Ur.S`7,....'r... .1 r, ”. -r. ` ril.. •+u.,r►r r� •�' Y, �.Cba� y.��'.•, „ ,1.•`i;j�''�rjl• �! �. ., I, �, �,: . • . •. ..n. . '•R•• 'T. li . `•;: 'r: i-.24''7.4. ,..41;•1%.•4 '.I:•,f. I�`w,ry..,f, ...... :af•�i•LIB �:f�, � .. 12/09/97 17: 19 5032421964 DEC. 9. 199 ► 4: 114P, t''1T7 METRO TITLE D ------',.77„.7.".,,-.. �,_ NO 807 P.4/4--- - L �,....11!..' 1 ,` 4,41': .t1••.e`V,i',;74:.,.104.;./. .tr'`,1 f. '.•,1 f ' . .: •••.k.1 1:;, J,;•i l �. k• a ' . • 1 t ' " f . r • R EXHIBIT A • • ) PARCEL I: The following described property in Section 3 , Township 2 South, N Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 17, FANTASY HILL, a plat of 11,,I� record; thence North 232.69 feet; thence North 89° 08' 25" East F' 60.00 feet; thence South 233.35 fent; thence South 89" 46' 30" West 11 '.: i 60.00 feet to the point of beginning. ' PARCEL II: I tr' i The following described property in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington C . l! g n ounty, Oregon:a Commencing at the Northeast corner of tot 17, F cil' th 89° 08 ' 2 " East, �, i Y of record; thence North 117.69 feet; thence Ilgrth 89° 08 ' 25" East ,.Iie.' ..41 to the true point North 89° 08' 25" li':il- South right-at-way line of S.W. South 89 t08 -4,� 25" West 271.62 feet to a Park Street; thence South 89° 08' � point; thencs South 00° 51 ' 35" East 92.00 f feet to the point of beginning. 1 bb PARCEL III: r . E I !4 The following described n Section j !4 property in ection 2, Township 2 South, (� ; A. I Range 1. West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon: 1,1 r Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 17, FANTASY HILL, a plat of record; thence North 117.60 <� e$•38 tees to feet; thence North 89° 08 ' 25" ` �Iy a point; thence North 9° ' a 25 feat the point of beginning; 9u 08 Z5 East 271.62 feet to , i re p 9 nning; thence continuing along the last mentioned t' • 1 , 1t course 85 feet to a point; thence South 65° 47' 52" East 75.99 feet; ''•. !' # thence North 33° 15' 17" East 150.00 feet to the South right-of-way - • � r 1• ; line of S.W. P 1..-% .': ,:l Park Street; thence South 89° 03' 25" West 220 feet to .I1 a point; thence Southerly at right angles to the South line of said F` J Street 92.00 L'' ••1 t' feet to the point of beginning. i �' 1 PARCEL IV: • , •1 r' .1 ;,•; The following described parcel in Section 2 in Towns ` ,'�^ 4 ec -,0\ 1.. .• ..., , ! `'"''. ,, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, 1 described as f d . •, follows; �� t t t i.! t{ ;� .' * Beginning at the Northeast - record in Washington County, Oregon; Lot c7, ort 117.69 HILL,feet plat he : � r of 11 ''.�� '+ thue ppoint of beginning; thence N t t89°c0 North 1ast69 .3et t� F r orty 40 1. to the 51' 3S West 92.00 feet to a point on the 3South t� •- I t � right-op-way line of Southwest Park Street; thence South 89° 08' 25" • .$'• West along said right-of-way - . f •' liner 86.04 feet to a point ' ' +'`, 's line of said Section 2; thence South p ont line,,9 West '. a � "+ feet to the true point of beginning, along said section line, 92,00 ,1�i�T+?• i STATE OFOR!OON 1 County of Washington J s8 .r t3 J,Jerry P.Na . . . ••of Aee°semenl (4 •ntl 7sxntlOn s.• • •e • wYena.for :o•Dh � y Rf�'•roar p1 Con- EXHIBIT A r ,- :,.f,�'� thewlthin wool atwrlu rflfytnot t• Y It• 5.f '.lt+WHI y.i end teGory •IRbp6ka1 l valved t'`,•.rf• ,v,: t•: ,ct its;rr'' . °0 i- burly, 7, ;M14.,'� 1•1 ;'t.• i"�t.`, ,tea'••°s' o ` rH .r'.i << * ►!)' s..1440 r p�, pf l• "•, .1 1 .. '►t:sy�,j.4:"r;1''4,1 -1,:, J T 'i e 1 I. - •.I' 1.{)•.+ '1N.f,,Mef kli:',. 'B ; 'r r° . - ± '•. • • �•� Yr 'f' 'fit.+•,..'�� '" ‘ ✓�! .� -: ✓,, ,} l ,� ' y' ,i' '. r ; ••-:'};,1,,r,'r.,l1 �� COUNT• .'- ( i''.".0.:4:-?,4%.'„,..,4 � °� Rect: 5369 y 1. •,}. ",;' 't' ',Ji, ; OS/D3/ Z 43.00 . i' T , �,,r .�. Jti, 1+..',,.'' .y''T7 1491 02:23: 16PfK v • • . . .,. •'.•:''t•••,. .`I-:.......'.I., 'A':•.';',.''':;(:!...' R•'Al I ,J:'1Y,�I '•, .I `� • '1'•,� .. 11� ', -I- ,` -'•r• I .1.,. i� ,./.,� C 1 •�•• ••.�.';•'•. t.ti "‘ '•�1.1'^-, !,l J.:l..' u'lu I.:u,. .: '�•lp: T•. {• S J t 5'r :' J � , :. •• 'jam+�, °•'•7f.: •• "•i" ,. %.- I, .. .- • •, +..Ail-. •A�a.1'i1.�1C1l ••..di+ .r;+rd�.2 !.04. ! ,r ,•1.1 .��y a".1_ 7I �. {y J•�,.� Ft .,�i'1 S' . 1.; •�6'•ITY, i `l'W-•twiJ,.ula�ll:fr '; '• ,i �, vi..:r,�,� i •�.1 . /�1 � tY. � ^'t`v'�.Y'�..i'!lirrtiM1 T���lh�y1�.��.,�yfJ.. ,NL�s�A+.a.•T, ,. ._..�•^�. . 12/15/97 13:26 503 222 2093 DEC-15 97 12:16 FROM:HARRIS ENT. ,RISES 503-222-2093 TO: 4-273+8891 PAGE:02/02 December 10, 1997 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Site Development Review Application S.W. Park Avenue, Tigard, Oregon This letter authorizes Waterleaf Architecture to sign, the Site Development Review Application as representative of Harris Enterprises, Inc., property owner, for Project Number 9641, Pacific Highway Day School. Signed .1. M. Frost •• orate Controller HARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC. PHONE(5031 222-4201 WATS 800-288.4201 2300 SW FIRST AVENUE,SUITE 104,PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 FAX 1503)222-2093 Pacific Highway Children's Village Day School Land Partition Review, Site Development Review Applicant's Statement December 10, 1997 Project Statement Children's Village Day School is proposing a new facility on SW Park Avenue in Tigard. This approximately 6,500 s.f. facility will be licensed for 100 children, ages 1-12. The school will operate from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, Monday through Friday. The facility includes an indoor pool, a secured outdoor playing area, and 23 parking spaces. The estimated cost of construction is $435,000. There are two covered porches along the north side of the building that encroach 5 feet into the twenty foot setback in the fenced-off playground area. We don't see these porches as being part of the building's main massing. The porches are intended to serve a few purposes. Architecturally, they break up the length of this facade to add visual interest and to make the building fit in more with the scale of the residential street. Functionally, these are places where the children can wipe off their shoes before going back inside the school, and can be used as a sheltered area for the children to play outside in bad weather. WATERLEAF MEMORANDUM DATE: January 7, 1998 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FAX: 684-7297 FROM: Rachel Silbert SUBJECT: Children's Village Day School/Site Development Review Addition to Applicant's Statement: As part of the proposal for The Children's Village Day School, l street improvements are planned along the south half of SW Park Avenue, per City of Tigard standards. The improvements will extend from the Hot'n'Now improvements at the east end of the site to the new property line at the minor partition on the west end of the site, approximately 330 feet. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks. T00d 0117.ON L5ZLb89 F 3e1111031IHOeJti dtj ldaLtJ11 61 :81 86/90/10 CODE SUMMARY GENERAL Nona INosx O.DRAWING 4 /V�rA E R LEAF WOWS OW MA W 1 no WAWA,G7001•••AIM WOW.,OP An!.o w Iwv.Irn All NOW•••Ioo OF ..r•o•aI•••OMIN T.w yr ' ° '�'_ waawr.... fi T I I o.rn•a t ww..�.=WOW mliw.e.aTrwa o.rwai.umuw. LOW ALL re�oma�MO WWW r V a••e ANN ..•AO•GIRD•..o•or•rcr AM map.AWN. •.••LAW OWNS FAWN= Ltlro MAW MN MOW.MAN.mono PROJECT xl�.W�.�►d 1•.r.I•r.r A•I.e•Marc Mrcula.. H NOLIOwo car.L.I BITE 1r.4 �.M O VAM2 Ulu. A.LOGIN WM MO �rf CAW•0• o• ,� MEOW WOW. .•PAM w. I�MSS= CPa�YAW •M..�M ♦y�IN WO•a•WPpWn LOGAWI y �d r s'Dl� Row.Lrold•••Weft ma w.oro • al ww¢+Ir..crnu o•w..no. ARNOW A[a.sa LOT NM OE OM LQa10•M a MAMMA"ea.el t WM.II WM ...pc 13 v., L 11.104.IL ArAY ••r I WI o 116 I\snn•WOW/•I.w.ea.COW AMMO �.>ow Aau••e• i —a— I LI L..o.Cum. Q?VICINITY MAP NO•Cm1 • ,—wY.rs Ei LW WOW IMO 1=1ir' I�oll�ll 1=11�I L' ``!,hr� ..^' ? as •"' PACIFIC HWY r-- a —.+ . WAY, Q"} .DR' . NNW ®EXTRUDED CURB ®EXPANSION JOINT ®CONTROL JOINT ®CURB VILLAGE DAY SCHOOL s NAT WOW• O••ae WAS., ♦• Iwo/ :a,..a oa.•Iaoouaa •111411 Itowtim. 4'COMMIE • .� I�II1111 � �co„• �•. .u•u• AVIV' r.... W AN w r. •ruwAal.r. �:••i "tirl l__, . ••00/1311M 1111=1111111 PAW O. IWO ®CUR9 e EXPANSION JOINT O H. CAP SYMBOL .C.C.Y, ,...GL AI AI NO MALI IPW•013 WNW • ■''.P r.. + 1 I . w!' rte a-r W., o'a Yr 101I.I •eU MW IPARAP MAW NIS ® I J/ I M �jjJ�4 A/.YLI•Iea II �T 464 ME i i .. � r...„ /X • r y�77 �� rrM•Mac•rI 1 5' P...O• WA • Dem 11.1.111 J [l YI LMYI woo WP•Ia1 sesame RevYvr rI T I.•OG IWW YtY MLY IOW #1 MO%WO M A►,a••I MR PLAY / . u M.nri e14.M.'L. • YARD i I N r • e . n I I .111• ... iY I . I •At T II • r• . SLf■fir''—_`'f MI , - 4 M17i 74111 NI ROW 00 SITE PLAN 11 WY.VW.II I\�' Qspc r#„,„..,4 oh FAM11.1111111 p 0 VK1MfYMAP r Q 7* • t .o1111 II..OMIL M0.IRAT II/II ) x ,r WWI u 3 KlK •r yiy COW,,a.M luq� a ,4 Zr A rj 3_,- - rA7tY[ &v m�:�r - 86.,a Ni on "'.,;i. ...`._— �.__._ •, �'� -- S's- _ _ • a•r ,1 } tl.�s� —pK w watt 'KK.xP • .w n n. i \Y>, 1� it J►' - '+ fl 1 '_' PARCEL 2 PARCEL i ¢ p S. ! ., AREA=14,567 SQ. AREA=27,936 SQ.FT. d in MN �� • Ir :-.-7,),-,',", f .1 1 /II�� ' (mil - PROPERTY ' dh„ ,,,,`,....il s I'm w.....1. Hoff y%4 A GRAPHIC WALE LL 1805 (armor I MIME f•..'UM !rr•r• R ON MIMI . .".. ” ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. „~ �� ” PRELIMINARY PARTITION PLAT � s p•nu r - FOR: WATERLEAF - r''° 3737 s�. ON Ave., N)o235-87 CR. 97202 1 OF 2 PHONE: (503) 2ss-e795 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE & DAY SCHOOL _ FAX (503)233-7889 __ _. ---- --- - - - war ,,, u-•�n __ nec w....,»,ng.•_ S5 11 11.-1110 IL-12111 11.201 LL.11011 uara 482.3, :Fitt 4 I.\1 bli;-\\\fr.,,,..= $ r." 7.........1.311' MOMI...rtIONIPAII WO PLAT NV NM-...N. I. roam illi mg ma-, 1 I it ale • ..i. Mr' 4 - -don ma*a map °111 04-77-41----71*--r--‘—isiralrFt- 411111 ME PARK STREET , _ f• _.___.---- , - ... -,-- . _ _ MEI bib, • , 1 .4 -7 -.-------•—•-- - 71.11114 IPIPIlkilliall11110111101.11111111w,,„4111.111r ,-.„- _••••e•r• 1 1 , 1.14 I IV I AW 11#MaliiMill=,— MI -- 13W; •-.141 MK YAP El MAI 11 / // ' 40 4 24 , 1 I PARCEL i _ 4044— Ali E.... ... AREA=I4,567 SQ.FT ' AREA=27,936 SQ.F q 44. 1, 7. N . / /\ (1/4 Su ... R`T -0 =,...--.,=—._____J i52,\\ \ \ ,\\\ ., ...___ ... rn.IF nail • H.,J1O\ • nut i .." - • • •-----—...,----,, ir I- ' ' / - " -- , , , , . ,, w - .,..., AIR/ 144.12 .:.:: .:-..-- -:-: ' ' ':40":''., • " . -'• - Ait r, r, c 4 'rift PROPERTY Mtn WISP'HOW X TAL MAL IN '. "AP; 1- , -- II 1k'111; l'' •'Willfinit'iniMitan' GRAPHIC SCAM LJLJ li-g4 (•me I ....d,-os a -...a ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. 03119-1 m mar gr IRMO MI C PROPOSED SITE PLAN , t3,11"`—r7 FOR: WATERLEAF W..--r--47---- 3737 S.C. 8TH AVE.. PORTLAND, OR 97202 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE & DAY SCHOOL PHONE: (503) 235-8795 2 OF 2 FAX: (503) 233-7889 NaT aux tsrfts-r OM MI 1.10031;1/1C1 1 ._ ____ ____ ocv 7 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIi.tG STATE OF OREGON ) RECEIVED PLANNING )SS. City of Tigard ) SEP 2 5 1997 CITY OF TIGARD I, 194cA-at;L S I L ` - , being duly sworn, depose and say that on ' T -r�t5 - 1z-- Z3 , 19?? I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) PAc tc-tL t-Atc.N W,4'.( (1,1 Ttc t+lq_l"� a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Ytoy EENte-- s�� / ePc -car with postage prepaid thereon. 77//1,L, - • Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIE) Subscribed and swom/afirmed before me on the .2-'ay of`,�J- O� - , 19'77 OFFICIAL SEAL -1,1 ® CO SUE E STONE C4X- I `� N01MMISMIS SION PUBLIC•OREGON N0. 044201 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY25,1988 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: /14q 2 S /9 7 7 �; apiicaat. oiease complete information below for proper placment with proposed project) •`'AME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA..SE: ( t kS v�L,�,A G�� 'CP( CA4. OL t TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: bik-•{ al-427 Name of Appl:cancOwner. max.-4-k C1V C1_C d twlTe'es.QLsj • Address or General Lon of Subject Popery: S ) PA. K- rc1P.r of t�rE�l�1C- aic(CA1 tA)A`( 11-1 L object Procer^+Tax l�iapis)and Lot t(s): TA3C I.c5r Z5 ta2 C- (005 rv.kognwarinascerrstriag mu \ TERLEAF LAt September 23, 1997 Philip Joseph Hess 10475 SW Park Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Children's Village Day School Dear Interested Party: WaterLeaf Architecture& Interiors is representing the owner of the property located on SW Port l a n 4 Park Street one block east of Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. We are proposing a site development review for a 6,500 square foot Day School facility for up to 100 children between S e a t t 1 the ages of 1-7 years at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits,we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, October 16, 1997 6:00 PM Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 228-7571 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WaterLeaf Architecture& Interiors Architecture / ,411111*. - & Interiors Rachel Silbert 621 S.W.Morrison Suite 125 Portland,OR 97205 Fax:503/273-8891 Phone:503/228-7571 4 Pe-S u°•fl Rebecca Lefevre Christopher&Margo Durdel Joseph H G&Tonia Easterly 208 Mockingbird Cir 10425 SW Park St 10395 SW Park St Santa Rosa,CA 95409 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Krista Kimmel PUBLIC STORAGE&Fund Institutional TBLD CORP 10365 SW Park St PO Box 25025 17901 Von Karman Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Glendale,CA 91221 Irvine,CA 92614 Selma Heppner Duane Francis Meyer&Elizabeth Annie James&Marciel Hatch 359 SW 5th St 13210 SW Watkins Ave Kevin Scott Hatch Dundee,OR 97115 Tigard,OR 97223 13205 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Robert&Kathleen Braden Terry&Dori Weese David&Leanna Trosen 13175 SW Watkins Ave 10600 SW Park St 10570 SW Park St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Joy Uri Joy Url Matthew Murfinsimmons&Micahle 13370 SW Watkins Ave 13370 SW Watkins Ave 13365 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Stephen Rossberg Michael&Barbara Resler Wilbur&Martha Bishop 10605 SW Cook Ln 10620 SW Cook Ln PO Box 23832 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97281 Gerald Holcombe&M Belinda Cindy&Dan Papen Francis Eugene&Colle Mayberry 13485 SW Watkins Ave 13450 SW Watkins Ave 13490 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Isaac Baruch TACO BELL CORP#06-578 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 1333 3rd Ave 17901 Von Karman Ave 17901 Von Karman Ave Seattle,WA 98101 Irvine,CA 92614 Irvine,CA 92614 Patricia Moar Lai Heng Lim&Wei Ing Chua Philip Joseph Hess 4114 SW Flower St 10467 SW Park St 10475 SW Park St Portland,OR 97221 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 My Dung Anna&Hai Nguyen Sandra Auld 10453 SW Park St 10441 SW Park St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON } ) ss. City of Tigard , being duly swcm, depose and say that on ScF7—r- g z3 , 1917 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) K�.14 JA (u r c k4- ) a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. l further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Of ice !crated at ok E� with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence cf a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLTENOTARI. Subsc.ced and swomiammmed before me cn the Z4Y-day OFFICIAL SEAL - 5UE E STONE NOTARY Pl.'�:O-OREGON CONWSSiON NO. 044201 - hfYCOMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 25,isss NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: /L(ai 25; /`� "77 ('-pcii z oieyse compiete _rio=acoa below for proper pla�rl--eat with proposed pr je-) NA.\M OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA E: (# L 7 ' S �nl� 'L Lam•( 4CCpl... i TYPE OF PROPCS J.. DEVELOPMENT: Tom•( C44-127 1 N awe of:-.p ii.--.^.:C e___ w A-Te Q-l.E�.� ZA t(1 C - 4- 1.1T2 5 • A.Cd. ss or C-e.e ni:lxirna of Subjec_?-ooe.--r P• , orb -+ -- o"F 4-kt )11 71 4442..i7 Luirec: Ts.=N apis) a.ad?of r;si: TA'( LCTr CAS ( 0 ri.:•Ognkasayvnsaarr s'ma++ls+.� • 06Th Rogavirifil OCT ° 11997 ARCHITECTURE&INTERIORS CLARIFICATION MEMORANDUM TO: All Interested Parties DATE: September 30, 1997 FROM: Rachel Silbert SUBJECT: Children's Village Day School The previous notice sent to you regarding the meeting set for Thursday, October 16 contained an error regarding the location of the property. The property is located one block west of Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The meeting time and location remain the same, as follows: Thursday, October 16, 1997 6:00 PM Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 228-7571 if you have any questions. • Architecture 621 S.W.Morrison Interiors VG IE R L EAF Suite 125 Portland.OR 97205 LAtFax:503/273-8891 Phone:503/228-7571 . \ • ' • ``- -- `. .� ` ~u�. t PROJECT �r �`� SITE ` 1141 PARK ST. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION. TAR LOT ^="~ VICINITY MAP UU =�� � � // ° °~° ==�, \ ^~ _____� ' --'____^ / CONC.PAD AT WT. I I N•STD.OIL.POST DOOPI,TIP.SEE// ����, `^� | - | _,/' �p � i ''~ ' 6_t__:i',......,1 . ./ , —de-17 HIGH WOOD ota-rmapt ENCLOSURE! 411. G f .." i lit Ili .. 1 0 • lb.oc.pluniNa.IGLAP 11121142.ROM I is, 1. \I \I \ \ \ \I 7 II • -_--_._-_-_--_---_-_-__--_'-___ _ __---'_'—. . SITE PLAN . � w �� 1 hx..FIDAVIT OF MAILIN STATE OF OREGON ss_ City of Tigard 1, l✓L— being duty sworn, depose and say that on Seer pt -> , 19T-7, ! caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (cr near) o A94-2 C, .& -1 T1GA4k0 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said nctrces were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States post Or„c located at P( So-A-..� ?b?=max] with postage prepaid thereon_ Signature (In the p ence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETENOTARIZEI Sf Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of c/c 1-U ker , t 8 1.7 OFFC1AL SEAL SUE E STONE !/`� �, `:. NOTaRY?MC-OREGON NQ TAR.Y PUBLIC OF OREGON t'• AuIsSt$i0N NO. Cr•420? Expires: MY CC!�l.NSSIGN p�1R£5 MA?25.1999 My CQrrtRliSSiCn (�apiic=t please ccmpiete ir-for aroa below for prroer pia ^e,t with proposed prcfec) YALE OF PROJECT OR PROPOS= :.r`> - C.+4t • S v■ — : OF PROPOSc.1) DEv .OP's •T: -Y 5CfrocL__ ' Y.e ai: r '4a►^.. _ L t -1,Ei' Ag..c-t rya Scram -& -- or Ge:e_^�T.x�r- aiSuajec Pope_ - 4w Qom- - PA- C- ,.„ad (1,-1 Ti 1 Lwee 1Lapc's) Z.2 Tzt T(si: - o c.' 1 ao R'JOgra AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSPI.NG.RETURN THIS Ali-WAY=T0: P . ... . . • _� City of Tigard PUtirting Diviszoa 13125 SW Hall Boulevard : Turd. OR 37223 1, F I GH PrR D AAi.)O 2.UC' , do affirm that I avip(represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed C141 LP E') S VILLAGE DA`i of ectng the land lcosted at ( .- .. _ = - - _ _ `_ : , - -== =-- - - -- lct(s) currently• registered) TA - LOT Se 102 C.e, I(305 , and did cn the '2-1 day of. PTL 1bE1) 19S/ personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fcr a QAry Sc t-F-oo L. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. - The sign was posted at. a Prt ecT sib ah SW Park ihrasgi" 71c5arcl) C2eGVN (state location you posted notice on property) S;gnature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPUET NOTARIZE: • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I 11- day of CC+10Pb-Cr , i 9 T 7 • (_( E STONE BONE r• tr; ,,. . Vo- c ;c CPJ Gam+ N O►AR PUBLIC O F OREGON 0+I tO"NO. C44201 y C MY Cr MMW.ION DOPES MAY 25,19� My Commission Expires: / f J (_pan==t please cc=eta i or=3>ron below or prover pia .,^ent wita proposed projec) ,N_A- OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA. z': Gr"`-°Re*+S v, 5G4-ko0I-- TYPE OF PROPObc 1.) DEVELOP1 ENT: Y ° OO same of Appiic litow'aer_ P Jd:t?QLZA F d-(IC 1'rEcTx ‘e'ATI>RA,Ne S Address or Get er 1 L.ocs.ott of Subject?rope_.f: SlN PA-(2,sc. 01.46 -"t' - ° • I Pa ref-\c.- t &LAU6•,( 0-1 -r\ Subjec= P-oaer-r. •; Itap(s) aad Lot=(s): `AX Lo 25 102 Lg $os t'bR+vaarersacrateraa-:s Pacific Highway Day School Neighborhood Meeting - October 16, 1997 City of Tigard Name Address Phone Number it /�s�� ,SG 437 - /a.s 167.5k A ',;) e/ (4345" Sr,& 10414- s J- 5 7 .`73 —'-- K.t-t - l L L0 u -s,'►J Ai s -1'5o L• \>&-1-"e--; 1-i tvl (a¢{,9- O-J Sr• 639- s 1 zg ce �� /iz -3 dOPS,� Pacific Highway Day School Neighborhood Meeting - October 16, 1997 City of Tigard comments & concerns: Martha Bishop, 10590 SW Cook Lane concern about whether the access to the parking lot meets Tigard code does this building meet required setbacks concern about circulation in the event of a fire enough parking spaces per employee traffic impact-will cars be lining up to get in no parking on Park Street is there room for emergency vehicles what are the hours of operation will there be a pedestrian walkway will there be storm drainage Krista Kimmel, 10365 SW Park Street Ralph & Alice Kimmel, 14960 Sunrise Lane will the school be open on weekends concern about noise in playground couldn't the lot be accessed from the Hot'n'Now lot will there be a left turn lane could there be a berm built up along the playground how wide is the sidewalk can't the city extend sidewalk further Peter Lim, 10467 SW Park Street how many open houses will there be a year, and is there enough parking general concerns about traffic congestion and noise what is the age of the oldest kids concern about the sidewalk improvement ending abruptly Michael Moar, 10500 SW Park Street Pat Moar, 4114 SW Flower Street, Portland concern about noise from mechanical units how far is it to the neighboring house could the sidewalk go the whole way will there be kids walking on their own what about getting speed bumps Park Street is a big shortcut - cars go by very fast what time does the playground open what is done in the event of a power outage could the sidewalk be continued at time of construction - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN()CALENDAR DAYS OF'nit;SIGN POSTING.RETURN THIS Al:i�WAVIT TO: f� ... .. �'^" .:" .. City of Tigard r . .•• ' ' f `~ :x Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard" • .7..... • Tigard.OR 97223 • . i, R I CM PR ) A ac00 UO , do affirm that I (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed C1-4)t p N S V II,t-AGE OA' ,SCM-oot,., affecting the land located at ( -- : _ , _ •- _ - ...- .. - - = --- - - -. lot(s) currently registered) TA• 1.07 1-5 102 Ge I$05 , and did cn the '21 day cf 95PTE 1 E- P . 19 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a GlA'Y 9c 'oe I-- application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at a prose s1 ov! SW Park S-h c ± trio 1.30A-ok) 026-C- 44) (state location you posted notice on property) re„6: iLoti,,Q Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me an the % day cf C %C 413 , 19 17 -$17., oFRrth- L (- �--� . SUE E: STONE k ' ` NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON `" r� Mlss+cl+°. °``'Mo' I My Ccmmissien Expires: /� 5 I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY ,_� ' J (_�pgii=r.t. please complete iafor=ation'below for proper place=end with proposed project) r�A1 E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: G+- L-DRet,i5 vci..1.►-& - • -44Oi_- 1 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: t -k406 t_- Name of 3ppiicantiOwner ►odT -L;ckF A-Or.N(IS G'p-142-E cf %t-k-n (4-S Address or General I.ocanon of Subject Property: N P A-Q K, iVCEEf C t-1 E -- ✓— �' °'F - 9-(k f\C_, V-kt k 4 ( lT4 -t,C,A.P47 L°T 2 102 GPI 1 o Laub}ect 2 ooe. Tax Man(s) and I of#(s): Al< 5 $ 5 r'logimpaayr,iacsszfposi_fr4S CLARIFICATION MEMORANDUM TO: All Interested Parties DATE: September 30, 1997 FROM: Rachel Silbert SUBJECT: Children's Village Day School The previous notice sent to you regarding the meeting set for Thursday, October 16 contained an error regarding the location of the property. The property is located one block west of Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The meeting time and location remain the same, as follows: Thursday, October 16, 1997 6:00 PM Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 22 8-7571 if you have any questions. Architecture 621 S.W.Morrison E 7 I n t e r i o r s VT" E R L E A F Suite 125 'G� Portland,OR 97205 ( Yg Fax:503/273-8891 �)�� Phone:503/228-7571 . ArFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) i, H i_.— ' \ - l , being duly sworn, depose and say that on M — -3e. , 19�, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) e,64-v,..._ SVSZ E: 'c— C - lT- eF 2A.eA c.-- E--tt c,u wa-i i n -ti CI a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Pcst Office (coated at, f(ou Sc2-0A.f-r �b RA-L with postage prepaid thereon. 1 Signature (In the p ence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETFJNOTARLZE) Subscribed and swam/affirmed before me on the day of 1 , 19_ 0.1., OFFICIAL SEAL <� %'= SUE E STONE � _I L�—C Jiii):7C,,e NpTppyptl9LIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COPAI1SSION N0. 044201 MY COT,�*�IlsSION EXPIRES MAY Z,1999 My Commission Expires: 5 p� ci (Applicant. please complete information below far proper place ent with proposed projec.) _ � NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA I CAI 'S VA tea— 1 k.( ?E OF PROPOSED DE4r:LOPMENT: D-Y Sc-ttoc1. � e of_pplic ui:'Owner. l/v ..• it `e. ¢ . i_.•�► dL-e3s or General Lxnrea of Subject Proper_r 4 w ffr — ST iZCe..'r ol-►r -csc-ke-- ,::r PA•u -c- _via It.i. 1 _. • . `WV ice_:!1 aS 1Lap(3) a+2Q Lot r(3): TA-+tc 1--e'-t— Z5 c 07 c_C I SO -1 • ..,, ,..J.■ .2 PROJECT SITE mu Paw T. "., LEGAL oescskirnem, TAX LOT 75 WO CD 1•0504.LOCATEyD N TI-IE 6411 WARIER OP SECTION 2,TOINSNIP 2 tICVNI RANGE I 2.EIT OP fl WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,OAPNINGTON C.O.NTY,°MOWN evICINIrr NIAP NO SCALE 1W-er CNAN LNG PINCE y.........■.J -7- —I -1 co4c.PAD AT DM I I POST DOOR.TTP.WE ED I I RP- P.. ,./—PWCWOCO CINERS--/ I I MOON.,DOWN 'Pr. . I _ EZZ ri I • - / 1 r- ,' I 4 i , i. . , . . . / 4., 1 1 . A.... / ... (E. . min IV A . 41. ..,, A-Re.4IGN WOOD DirVellER ENCLOSURE IP 4.•0.C.PRAMIN6 ILIA.Ap&DING.WOOD i pi ill ... , r i 4.: Totrl AND WOOD TOP CAP kiVe'-42'GAIL ; YARD MI PANT TO MATCH!BUILDING MI.14—1 IS \O \t2 \I \22 \ \II \urASII ik. I i I • _ , • 'T I L. J .—.—.— 0 0 SITE PLAN 1vc G. -N=PC-S -177 1.1.vn.F • Rebecca Lefevre Christopher&Margo Durdel Joseph H G&Tonia Easterly 208 Mockingbird Cir 10425 SW Park St 10395 SW Park St Santa Rosa,CA 95409 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 ( Krista Kimmel PUBLIC STORAGE&Fund Institutional TBLD CORP 10365 SW Park St PO Box 25025 17901 Von Karman Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Glendale,CA 91221 Irvine,CA 92614 Selma Heppner Duane Francis Meyer&Elizabeth Annie James&Marciel Hatch 359 SW 5th St 13210 SW Watkins Ave Kevin Scott Hatch Dundee,OR 97115 Tigard,OR 97223 13205 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Robert&Kathleen Braden Terry&Dori Weese David&Leanna Trosen 13175 SW Watkins Ave 10600 SW Park St 10570 SW Park St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Joy Url Joy Url Matthew Murfinsimmons&Micahle 13370 SW Watkins Ave 13370 SW Watkins Ave 13365 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Stephen Rossberg Michael&Barbara Resler Wilbur&Martha Bishop 10605 SW Cook Ln 10620 SW Cook Ln PO Box 23832 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97281 Gerald Holcombe&M Belinda Cindy&Dan Papen Francis Eugene&Colle Mayberry 13485 SW Watkins Ave 13450 SW Watkins Ave 13490 SW Watkins Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Isaac Baruch TACO BELL CORP#06-578 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 1333 3rd Ave 17901 Von Karman Ave 17901 Von Karman Ave Seattle,WA 98101 Irvine,CA 92614 Irvine,CA 92614 Patricia Moar Lai Heng Lim&Wei lug Chua Philip Joseph Hess 4114 SW FIower St 10467 SW Park St 10475 SW Park St Portland,OR 97221 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 My Dung Anna&Hai Nguyen Sandra Auld 10453 SW Park St 10441 SW Park St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 /viard, rka,, ,y) Sitv2iF ( oo( � 172:0 01/05/98 10:45 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0 001 2..f•f f 1 1.f:E*:}:8:**:!:L:}::i:s..i.T y..{....i. *** ACTIVITY REPORT :E:$:}: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 7751 CONNECTION TEL 503+273+8891 CONNECTION ID START TIME 01/05 10:40 USAGE TIME 04'20 PAGES 7 RESULT OK SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENC'F Facsimile To: Company: Wq. rLe4 r Phone: 228- 757/ Fax: ,273 - go i From: kicj di)I_ Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 I/ 7 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: /5-- Pages including this page: 7 COMMENTS: // �^ / ` ere ire C. .9M JO es c /M/.�U �C.4'il'• /�1te DO,-/lees G S_ P, / &ie rgre l/ , Cc 9ree.�t.e/7� 1, /dam �% +�'i i i45 Dr" a S o:4 1 J->1747: 11 /i-rJ r 9�"c�/)a f ru: i4�/4 �-.£ iirl d 6� XG ;�a a, - Ors ,Sfre�l'i rZtxrYae,771-s ,--714/2 01 Y.-A/4__Jd/17 4Y hG L/Q C�'100 .4-wev(�//_/ (@9� ,J,�f G� � ACED p WATERLEAF MEMORANDUM ✓q V�N0 Np c��y 2190 DATE: January 2, 1998 OFTRD TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FAX: 684-7297 FROM: Rachel Silbert SUBJECT: Children's Village Day School/ Site Development Review ' operate with 10-12 employees, and u to 100 children. The Children's Village Day School will ope up The hours of operation are between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m,Monday through Friday. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks. TOOd 6920N L6ZLb89 E fla3l I Hoau dt131d91tIM 92:T T 86/E0/10 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD t PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES pm?�ullRt�iCc�mmun�ty NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE 77.2.q 9� STAFF Sul,4`Gre APPLICANT: / er/2af 4rdilchct AGENT: Adeira/ 44o/voo/ Phone:[ I Phone: [ 12 28-757/ PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: - ,S/ pZ Cg, T� /Aos TAX MAP/TAX LOT:X71 /0390 S'u/ Ark NECESSARY APPLICATION[S]: S, vjh e,/- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: live-A 9 4,/a/L%•;s !I/� .cd60!/f'r4` ior 41- ii�h, alp s COMPREHENSIVE ` PLAN DESIGNATION: C-G ZONING DESIG iATION: G-6' CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT (imin,/ FACILITATOR: See ls/ .Ovv�e.d TEAM AREA PHONE: [5031 0 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Av r e lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front 9 ft. Side , °4,,:p s d 0'ft Corner ) ft. from street. �,,�+�� P,cs, ear Maximum site coverage: 85 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /S % [Refer to Code Section 18.62 e50 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. \ The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2;- times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18164.060-Lotsl CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NOM-ResltlinUil iopllcatlom Planning Oipirtmliil Seclloll a• Post' ling request pad 7664 ROUTING — REQUEST Pleas Er READ To VB W�v ❑ HANDLE MIQ / pl-) IG ❑ APPROVE J'11 end . r, �Y > r/ FORWARD ❑ RETURN ( • PjTS ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD Gb •• ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Gleg Dat. rz1/97 From JUh o\ SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: feet from the centerline of . Established areas: feet from . Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. r Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. [Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS -- Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least half (I/t) of the building's height; and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: 55pgc s + /S cs pe-(/ 5roocv Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): a/ ISM/lc/4,-d q6=5 1-i- . ADA �)c_kcss6l0. Secondary use required parking: Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces, The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-family. commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 3D1 . Minimum pavement width: .2 51 i - Curd /Ey,/, � All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: /4' [Refer to Code Section 18.10 and 18.1081 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NOM-Residential applIcationJPlanaleg Department Section cALKWAYREMENIS . Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps or elevators of all commercial, institutional. and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required . access and egress Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building ' commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-0901 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Section 18.102] B FFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100] The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: 4P-.0 feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along ND CAP NG y el COtryeu e-c � r /o/ /�!k- wI//LE. ti �/�VA� t,✓es l L Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or i on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum] caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls. and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18. l / CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Anolication Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NOM-Reslds tIaI eppllcatlee/Pleeeleg Department Section SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.1141 _.-} SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. (Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Developmen7Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R 8 0 96-44 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall presery and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of 4 portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 eet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11. . No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site n be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate C idor: No structures, developmen construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kin , or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A gravel walkw y or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike pattyfnay not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize dis rbance to existing vegetation; and Vc'ater quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the q Y Y g approval of the Agency or City. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential application/Planning Department Section Location of Vegetated Corridor: • In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SWM) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS – — A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees, Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.J70.D; Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires na mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 ITIGAT1ON Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property. the Director may, require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city. either public property or, with the consent of the owner. private property. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of NON-Residential foplleatls.,PIsoning Department Section The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section. a party may, with the consent of the Director, -. elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18150.070[D) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City of Tigar plicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washi ton-County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision nam Milications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmat approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 648-8884) !IIA1 AAT1VE - - ----_____,. The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards: Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) ODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 18.100 18.108 ,/18.120_ 18.150 18.84 18.96 � 18.102 V 18.114 18.130 18.160 18.88 / 18.98 �✓ 18.106 ✓ 18.116 18.134 18.162 18.164 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways. the drainage system. the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact. the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.050) When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 i I NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and that members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing) date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) CITY OF T16ARD Pre-Mpfication Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 MON-lefldentlal aeellcation/Phpplp'Ospertaut Section IL DIN6 PERMITS . , Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been Issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. R CYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.1161 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: / / .=- 1/re 7nr7n�' 1ecA7-1vt, L�ti.( 1,1 ZSrJ G // a4.r}-1Pi,/ rlf L (/l7 Ai9e /A4/710 Fine r) 0L7 / n!! X /L2C 'j lit z(' hrtnc ?LJrf' f a7/ el4// PUI.a—r 7-e1 /r 17,wa/ ) 1 O 0tit/I( `l/•f•� PROCEDURE ,< Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT bet accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY Of TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-desIdeptlal application,Pi eu9 Oepertment Sectlee The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will • determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. -• The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard f26nnin5 r''p icmc or, . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig available from the/Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thin pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Jv/►q ,j olvk CITY OFTIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: [5031639-4171 FAX: [5031684-7297 O:Uegle\pettrilmistsrs\Drsapp-cast Ingleeerlei Satin:mitten WDreepp-c.epgl 21-Mar-97 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Motes Page 8 of 8 NON-geslde.Uel eppfeaUepi Plteeleg Ilepertmeel Sullen CITY OF TIGARD A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST '!!, CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: .APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE .1 MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) E' B) Owner's signature/written authorization e' C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed t� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies /8 E) Filing Fee $ :Tee cc pay, Ica/ SITE-SPECIFIC MAPS)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies �. 1 . Vicinity map a 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) Ca 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive \lap Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses t 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAD LSE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development PI, ndicating: a. of Copies 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties Q' 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site Q-= (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area o. (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation CT' (e) Outdoor common areas a (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site t� (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site e� 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions e- 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped e° 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 1 1 . The location of all structures and their orientation ze" 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements rY C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND 1.5E APPLICATION f LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Drawir - Indicating: "lo. of Copies The site developmer. an proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces o 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials o 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions o (b) Erosion control measures that will be used o F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The owner of the subject parcel Er- 2. The owner's authorized agent 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date GY 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ram 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines t3' . Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements tt{- 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable LAND USE APPL'UTION/LIST PACE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Prelimin: • Plat Map and Data Indicating: ''o. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision o 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of now of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 1 7. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application LAND LSE APPLICA i ION J LIST PAGE 4 OF 3 J) Solar Access Calculations: o K) Other Information No. of Copies a h:'Jogin'paay4nastersvckfistrnst Mav 23, 1995 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 3 OF 3 P /A-A City of Tigard, Oregon • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) ecr4A to 3a feet from centerline. tibILP ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along C' 7-16.-?‘ .6.l he,,o'' ( ) street improvements will be necessary along A 4 edge-ae.te 41 ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section A streets, or in the Ce I Business District), necessary stn signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( ) Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to ?ea,L2Xti, , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) _ (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) g inch line which is located in - 2e1- 6,1 . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Y►G? F— "�[tr<t c /L'LpC'l� -ac/L c J ,71- CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineenng Department Section Water Supply: The � c4o, Water District - Phone:(503) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. Fad .117_,Lif . yam Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section • 65 percent of the phosphc contained in 100 percent of the ,rm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. (J Payment of the fee in-lieu. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Department. Building Department Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: - 1I347 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 h\login\patty\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r mst) December 23,1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Oepartment Section Pacific Hwy. Day School Tigard, OR July 15, 1997 Application Information Applicant: WaterLeaf Architecture & Interiors Richard Aanderud 621 SW Morrison, # 125 Portland, OR 97205 Ph. 228-7571 Fax 273-8891 Site Plan: See attached Drawing A-1 Proposed Use: Children's Day School Tax Map & Lot #'s: See attached Current Owner: Anil and Anne Fernando ( Purchaser ) 17549 Oak Meadows Lane Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Topography: No contours available at this time. Site has a gentle slope downward from west to east. Relatively flat. Architecture 621 S.W.Motnson 6' Interiors Vf E R L EA F Suite 125 �� Portland, OR 97205 ( AI Fax: 503273-8891 �J�� Phone: 503228-7571 de✓Imp�4 !� �°h ttr,9 'S R-35 — 64- 4,4s 54-174 "1 ecCsdh L/f&idcT M 7e�s f 8 : RC) PORK ' ( \�''� 75 /t/o�erfr r4P D✓I4 1.0 \'° jiti_taol t `• To ro 1911.71 , sr? a�w /// 9 �'S.T.114 71 i"�\LZ 4.3�1,..Q.�1.A' ll► . i,•_?._1Li 1J.. >> 1, - -- ... �T 0 ( Z i 14624./ if -I/ 32 -•- � =r K 69°40'W 416.72 60096 ,.?. ' 2GG.61 W i1C 114 Az, r I805 1? / A35-11-5" / r, A 2' )1. 3 r/7 .97Ac. m1. 190b / a V D A J:Xi' lf' fc h( i , .52 At. �-7/� e Xi .. �� in m i 00 e- ]rte 1800 ?..V., ` ?` E20 52 t q /� Cfl /' Ifl��Ct• / �- SE 3 n �? :Cl W DA r 3./.s Ar. f8b4 ,, ' H ti J m NJ T�� � bg ' N W,I ,A j } c r. Rl �CE74tj : N / . *.. fit, ' Co' / m ac • 1802 .�.r '`st i= / / w r + .84 Ar_ ' / /N. • . 0. �.2$ w �%, / 1 v+C c4.0 `' :I. y` /11/ / O 57 aZ l a 7-4 /e� ,ri �� . / O / +No ,�4, ru /0390 St,./Peirk �,� �P 1 ^' R'b•• e. /-.)- / a 0 Ago.00 iv /If / 4� / Ac � 1D W(F� �f�Q fIr / / / m m • / / W :i::>:>:::.: .;<:;Pre-A PP s CD : Yi• S M T W T F S............... :::h<•f:::,::: :::::::::::•• 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 $y'ii:;:�{:>y:.....::::::::viii.}ii:•i:•i:•:4:4:v.........::::. fii:•::.:�:•isb:•:•:if:?4:��•.,:ii}i}:{:,.:ti4iii}i:^T::::::::::::::::::::i:<:::ii:::;iii:};::;:}«::::i::::'ri::::i�iii::i:::::::::::::... _ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 •:> 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday,sda July 9 '1 7 2 99 �� 8:00 8:30 9:00 Richard Aanderud 2287571 SDR C afa P6yiSchool 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 • 5:30 6:00 11:30AM Thursday,July 17, 1997 • DATE: PLANS CHECK NO PROJECT TITLE: W---. -' COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 179.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 45.00 .�.i OFFICE $ 164.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 172.00 I0 INSTITUTIONAL 74.00 /e1 q. PAYMENT METHOD: �` ,% \ ,p cp CASH/CHECK a � CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) _.JNb`TITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND,AVG.TRIP RATE TRIP RATE 67.(`j BASIS: CALCULATIONS: 33 (6, 50, 95)( x X. x 49.101 3 �f � aa,,l X �� a3� 8p a o'f PROJECT NERATION ` �t Q FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT. PREPARED BY'. I:TIFWKST.DOC(DST) ACITY CTIGARD `�' �' " °°'� �,%� '�I�I± DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SERoV 6CES MPORTANT PERMIT NOTICE -: Plan Check # ''/C- L/C JUMBO FERNANDO 17549 OAK MEADOWS LN LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Parcel : 29102CB-01805 Site Address: 10400 SW PARK AVE ***** Subdivision. : Block • Lot : Jurisdictions TIG Zoning : R-3. 5 Remarks: Site and grading permit for construction of a 7, 306 sq. ft. building for a childrens day school This letter is to confirm receipt of your Site Work or Building permit appli- cation which has been forwarded to the plans examiner topdayy for review. �, As a reminder, the associate land use caseis) is/ares.P�' W1� M '�7"C01.f Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of th use easels) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff pc ndirated nn your final order. _.. ._ : :.A plans ARE NOT routed to the planning or engineering depar _ :::_ ou must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of th- nr!n = a- r+1 ',ns review process. ,tLCr 6hu building plans review process has been completed, your site w: : •uilding permit will NOT be issued without approval from the engineering a' 1--Wing departments. r you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact me dir p39-4171 for further clarification. k----- r-•*,elopment Services Technician 02/20/98 16:34 13'503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0 001 •.4-1.•1..1.44****** •1 1 1 E i:******** 1•h... ACTIVITY REPORT *** ..E..E..E.......********4.4.4.4 1 1 11-1-1**** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 9581 CONNECTION TEL 503+273+8891 CONNECTION ID START TIME 02/20 16:34 USAGE TIME 00'40 PAGES 1 RESULT OK Post-Its Fax Note 7671 Data, #of -Lq- Pfl9es / I. To Gil‘ 4_Z.0 Co/Dept. �Q Co. ' —Phone A*. Phone# so- LL # , , �+ 6 5— y/_7!Xi!'o7 City of Tigard Fax "-G,/ Fax Cemniruatiy Drvrlupmtnt $11,9,90 A Britrr Cnnmtxulty MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Rachel Silbert 0 FROM: Julia Hajduk �',�'r DATE: February 20, 1998 SUBJECT: Tentative date of decision for SDR 97-0017 and MLP 97-0019 As I mentioned on the phone this morning, I have had to extend to tentative date of decision for the Children's Village Daycare and Land Partition. The anticipated date for rendering a decision is now February 26, 1998 instead of February 19, 1998. As we discussed, the tentative dates occasionally change due to work load in a planner's schedule. In this case it was a combination of work load and the holiday weekend preventing the decision from being completed within the time frame originally targeted. /V 061114-j �� ,` 0 ' � n p,ok\-- %gyps v./ iNi `0'? #N gc,AE��1V�� 71 .\.A\• �� �� ° z 1g9a v , ��01 col' - „v..: City o f Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 TO: PERIM Tri SENDER U s ,r....1: .. , CATIQZS Pete Ne Y''..4 - ..- Port-. • OR IN 204 ��� -ate Route To: • Surveyor Development Review Engineer ./ FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST Plat Name: W t'iri i2--5 6.rkc.A?- S V(ua,e) Case Number(s) R--9 1- 1 n q -6619 Address: 1 z4O J f AL4- �r (Do NOT release addresses to the public without consent of the Engineering Department.) Contact name and phone CA-W-0.> c 4 P& @ � - Z�S - 8-190 (Fill in when plat is dropped off) DATE RECEIVED: 2-Le lie) DATE FORWARDED TO SURVEY: 1JIzIaS SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Street alignment and width,continuity p /U A- 0 2. Curve,corner, cul-de-sac radii ❑ , f�- 0 3. Dedication, vacation, easement conveyance 0 N Pc 0 4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map Comments: By: I, --3-97 3 Surveyor's Signature / Date Page 1 of 1 I:\ENGPRI V.DE V,FIN-PLAT.DOT 7---- cm CV/ 77-44i#e5 7);i1v515 //-e I . 1(..;'16.44 -F---- , „, , ,,,,,,,„„,:„., - ,- ..,,.. , -,;* , '-;,;, , -, ,; ::,,V if : : _, ,,:,,, FAY i .— <===. :::.,:-,- ,s,:,:,', r l', n r- I,-i' ...5'4,;; m _ C ' .......... " ,,,,,,,,,, F I :'.?:''': :''.: /16,4,072r oftnnsit\P' . „,„459 . . f 7 16 16 ' '. .1 . 1----------- „ ,--- •.,/,'';';',a':',,'s:',":; k ef-T, 454‘L- 7i.."7:,:',.:',,',:' :',-,?.. ,'-',: r ',■ --...-'-'-'''''' ':::;-:;-'''/:-:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,./.4„.....,,,,,,....,....,, ,,,,-,,,,:,,,,.::::;;;;;„:„....„:;0::;,, ,,y ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ LANDSCAPI INCREASED ALONG LANDSCAPING REMOVED AT RETAINING NG WALL AT SOUTH ND EAST EDGES SOUTHERN EDGE OF PARKING TOTAL SITE AREA: 21,930 SF 15% LANDSCAPING: 4,190 SF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 4,300 SF I V/Y4 5/XI liN/1/5 r>c< ef ii Ong q7 -- °D I 01i'..; :.3 19:44 -,x.5525 £1 O1/20/9a 15:38 $503 625 6179 RIDE pISPO$AL' 01UO3/003 0l'19/99 15o42 WATERLEAF ARCHITECTURE +16256179 ~`"`, -, V N0.483 POO2 I , et;a '-I ' i m r a 1 I I r "s. 3- 1 @u 5 1 - Ys7� • i;'+ ` '� .1 4 s m - . , ,...._ -.:--_-.-..- -..- ----- - :r •'''' —— ...'"-..... -- Imam 4 / ig I — .. " IV, a * ■ '4'' 4 : 7" I# f MINIM 1......'''.WIIIMIlli a 1 14111Mal 6 .I. R�1 a ( It Z. IP ry. 4 ltIt I •V. v 1 '''''‘'.<11. " ♦ H,. ..,`v • ' .Oa , •. .; t 0 J' N j 11: 0 '''''''11 !;77 .: ,4 c I al tt--- (.1% /11 •----- te. • i , : ." . t • `_$ � I6.- b- `"I S. 11111401 • : ' r ,4„,,,,,,s. R; 1 , I I r ; ',I 'W '-`..,�.�!i�iir — a • ' , .4- qi. •IP Z ' . • 1 it• ;.? .-„ tits . .4., { a II , 1 Og* it I1 • I•i-r-,- t li''-.-;I'It,{-,.1.-, '-P 41:i-'.V••I't ri,-`r,T .A r . Route To: 1. Planning ✓ 2. Building 3. Engineering Tech I 4. Development Review Engineer -- FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST I 1-)(2.... -W11 Plat Name: ( hal-G.5 t-4-44-6 0-46) Case Number(s) I L 1' 91-0 DATE RECEIVED: l9P DATE FORWARDED TO PLANNING: Z (I 6 To: (/� r► , Planning Division Check if Check if Considered Okay 1. Phase boundaries/v/4 ❑ ❑ 2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration 3. Lot numbers E/ 4. Access restrictions, reserve strips NA L] 5. Condition of Approval Satisfied—/7 i/ cd c' LI [ 6. Public& Private streets (location, width,etc....,)///4 7. Preliminary Plat approval date- 1 yr period OK ❑ Q� 8. Special Deed Restrictions(C.C.&R's)ti/4 ❑ ❑ 9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) NI4 LI LI 10. SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE N/41 11. Assign Case Number(above) ❑ Other Comments: By: .3 -z 9Z Planner's S. nature Date FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: 3-:z-98 Date Page I of 4 I IENGPIU V-ff'W1N-PLAT DOT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: BY: «_.! 3A/ / Building Dept. Signature Date FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.:Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) /1// f)' /L sr'� Date ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if Okay Street Names Acceptable Manhole Numbers ❑ Assign Address(s) - (front page) [� Update City-wide maps C7 Comments: By: " ; �, 3 -d -7V Engineering Tech's Signature Date FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER Date Page 2 of 4 1-ENOIPRN-0EWF1N-PLATDOT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Check if Okay Public Improvement Plans Approvable/Approved ❑ Public Improvement Fees/Deposits ❑ Right-of Entry, Release& Waivers, Easement ❑ (onsite - offsite) Public Improvement Agreement ❑ Public Improvement Assurance ❑ Conditions of Approval Satisfied? ❑ Sewer Availability Letter Prepared ❑ Joint Access,Non-Remonstrance Agreement ❑ Comments: By: Development Review Engineer's Signature Date Page 3 of 4 I:1QJ41PRI V-DEVON-PLAT.DOT Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY: v( DATE: `1(411 U Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY: DATE: Forwarded for City Signatures BY: DATE: (e 14 1'1 e Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File BY: � -- DATE: (g f Released to Developer for Recording BY: DATE: (Q(fl(1w Authorize Eng. Tech I to release addresses BY: ( -- Date: (p 11 Copy of Signed Plat to DST's BY: (0.- Date: 4,(II (t3 Page 4 of 4 1\ENG1P JV4 E AfM-PLAT DOT 8 • „ . , 04)).) ,--" Ae. , / ? 7Y er- / 1/Z,t- e-€' .._ , epor . , 701)Orel'11-„i 1' 4, k r'3' k1 v ;19:4,,gra aleZe,,,t .71r,- , 04tre• -,42.0<g-e,fr, ' Ll 11;>. t I 1 1:, (1- - ,a,...41/ ■ , 0"4446 -- )(f741 6'-( ,10-71-0*, '4"f t ''11 0.,.4,--r•-. A-Foe-eV Z-Pr-- 4 1.■kle 1:4,-.1.14e't -) i IN / .4- file-e'l-i-e-V _541e-c/ --• 7 . ;fred7e:p4•-'4 elifiVE 35;41; _s-pg g7-A4/71,/a.1 f7..4 /i ar /09-eoir 1 eA.‘41. i s.41, of i- : & < 1 - 2: l - ' L 91--9--- A-// -0Zik-- ,47ay a t,-e ( - :. y/ 711,›1 :1a-C9/, / , L j ---7 1 .4. i. fi ,,i, _• / ,_,zt/r . ‘.47/' ,..e4, f-e-eC V-'-'.-::L7-4,q ‘1,e-- 1,4 5.:ywr.04-. .7/"4 1- 1761'f 41#1: /Y-d2"11" iLCie--T"4` 10, Oa . Aip4i#01.-r-e-s-'1- y ,!/..e.e1-1/ ,e-- _I- 1 't p/..740-9/ / - , 421-gi,5p,e- wr ,,_,,,,, i ' 6_,,,' ie ,F - -: v<; -S-,p,,e 9 .- /z,, i79- 0.°‘ I e -e-c4 aZ.,..c, N ' ' ,-, if/2,43 4 , ,' 1e141 i 51- 7 • g'-(I4t4 749- 1 tj07 tl , .,,,2/ i 6714,,r677,r4 oire, ?r-erlt4'"'fs4f) 1-. (.4-a-- CrX- 1.-et,;(4 1,y/ree t1_,,,,_,,,,e,7t• a , Zieilto.,.._e__HLS, ecie,...1,,,....--ere-e-ct--- . ;-A-8.--c-e---67,* ,/4 - i . • , .,,a, 4-riAllj-V Pk?,_.4 4l. g- iox f /5-7'-e"' ..- -,y-Li-z /fp 4911 7.0' # /7/5.44-z., pizji,,e-,,a , -r-fue. ‘(-e-,-,-6/a--1dcl-4 e'o-a-se• ,, l- A‘-'4<'`"4.7, . , _• z,„zi - • cy z ,_ joy,,,,t) iii,,,„ .(_. /, , .,tzeme -- -- - ,,,._ .e_ . La A, . . --'zizir5-‘319 )1`r7--- 7---/-1-----P ,A...z,,e ,,e_.e_.- q-r ie e ; S-ete, -P,11-d-7,-/-', 4( ,,, ,, , d,,,,,,/:4- :41-14- .e P5-(A42/0"4/L(- -ecL-4"1"-CAP c21"e' /i.,. . ;.. ,0/ / , e 0- -e-,"_ L -2fl 1-11 opi_ _.7 .::4 ft I-S X--/1441.j----44- ' 7,"■ -- -i ''' .- 9,1,7 -‘-4;wiu&'5.:_ ti,-- -(-24-1-1_i ,,,, ..1",5 e e l':1`- - , --x -,----- rrz �` ti e- .- 'o-co-2Z *- "Z.-7‘ i-e-'' 1 cs — r(" - 4,/: -f-e- ,-A-4/f 0- a-tote----t/fr/cla., i,e, "e' ,,„.j,,4---7 v_ Jai . -rh'- $`—/ 7-2- f3r-- t,.,,. , o cievAy -, ‘44-g-viee,—,97 1/-K_,,Lta _L' ( P-, ,_,:,-- c-_. _.4,,,(,_ q. ,y,22i, ? 7,_.ze « ., per - -� ,,,/-644-e—e-eza--c,5-- ,, ',, , ./ n'46:1 04 4 i-/-f_ -=-0-/-(--h)--- 7/-P--r L74,fe4- -- -Pt fre--"--7---.4- --- 6_07f-,-- -1- (e.. .e_<!4_, 4„/„Le_.4.ti t Ci71 ) d' , ` ��#y"' /77f 7 s -e—tti �� * 5 Ga�� < .� iii d-E dad C 4-e Z.— ,-; ,:; ! -/ �j� .�C 1C c-f_iA✓`LtJ-�,l�J/ fiG� "/ '-'- , '' - - _";j,:/ y)Zsei,_,, - 1. d-6 ., 1 , ' £_-_, 4 / e?"-f c 4 .-.7---27z- ae____e_. "--),---ae.. /A-- -t-of-r-", a-4 -,2 /fre-i-€- frhp-te-4,71- z4erc,„/ ,ze,t ,,,ciziFer-,---P.e--_,/- ,1st r / _ ''qi `` `- "')7-e '''',/-z-ez-41- z 6,,a(z_eed.g -rzeL.,---- ,e_ QY---co„.,,,wetr-- a.,a..-fri-.e c-‘77-7- 7 K-5‘7-/-Y--i-e--ei _./ .A---A ;-,7 6•-1 -0*4,-,.-leg-L-e,--yde ; ; ,,_ , ('- 4--‘--(-P-a-yi 7//a"-f- / /”',F, N:,g((>9 It 4y,-X -e-e--e-,f-- a_T, 6 -,2, ,ra.i dd-d-ii- -,re .7 - Az.'etra7 , Z2-/-‘-A5-7,k,"7-'0.-, /4/41-e : , _ ;),Tcz,,- /71-e;;71 -e4-e-i-re/ ' .,vA/re-g G7-e-t-r ;-ep--- 'G L' r F.� 5)z/e,v-i-e-at-a,--,a i-i?.-4, A/s9,4_ea - (/ ____ c �` - -4 �'d-i q, i .. 77,A. 2-7--,,,,:e.egt-,/ / -z-K_ 6,„,' , ' ,F. 3-7' ; ,, / ,/ LI_ .-- --,-,--e-e-- 4-:`:.4-- ,..z.-44vP`e-elv,-1`;1// - -i-, 94 37-//-3-2 a -F — fr4 ' 77- i2ei -. \ #t› ,‘) ,_ , Weo-e11-7-7C_ 160:ir e 0- , /re_ dZ;:/'/ 'I 0/iffe- ,4//-e'7:0-~-,2l,_, Gr/Y ./94-fe frAhlf l' . dj4- 1 ' ' / / ..'://t 91e)- - / 1 ' ' Q‘11"d( kfri /r -- t ? ,ae,,, ; ,/ ; a ,0 °' -'' re:::)7/‘ a °6! 17(1 , , "X, 'i° --ej 7912 it':1- rt9-71-"€-47. N 1/-. 772, _7,9,/, i �" rx C:i/z -ei/Y/Ckl>91 --e-c-eJ" / e I / / /r._....., it .'7A1' 1 V W/ 01.€-#--1/ 1---1‘e , y . ,,,,,,,,, /,. / ____ _______ i,t(7(2e ,/,:/„(„&i . Pfrfri, ;- 4/- / C,,,,,,,,`__,1,Le ,,,,,,,z.._e,-7,...e„._- --/-6-0‘ 7P-9/ (/1V--7'-J i ) i ,,,, - -23-0-c- ,f 0,4,d, a. ),4_ii__4,20„.._e_ , -w, . -, t. frs,„/ a,7,(--e--c--Ci - 1 A ,„‘"1 ' 1/ - ■ ,,, s, r 401 ', ,a.,,,rLigi) ‘",,p let--'1/ '1 i r W;" \ r i.y : . j-' , 4-r rr i \ 1 � ifia Martha Bishop CITY OF TIGARD 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 OREGON Dear Ms. Bishop: This letter is to confirm our conversation from earlier today. Staff anticipates issuing an amended decision to the Children's village daycare (SDR 97-0017/MLP97-0019) based on information brought to staffs attention regarding some previous development activity on adjacent lots. This revised decision will be issued within the current appeal deadline (March 11th) and then a new appeal period will be established. Once I have received direction from the Engineering department regarding whether it is in the best interest of safety to utilize the existing easement, I will be contacting you to discuss their recommendations. Thank you again, for bringing the issue of the existing easement and past history to my attention. Sincerely Julia Powell Hajdu Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 c7,&A-1 "- / 7v.7 A " 9eer'r2 i"'Ar ( / fte20:7140 y, ` — ? 7- e:) ( --7 r 1 r� jrn7er2—?t/—ee- ez :;;, #9 „cal /OW t-t-t- C*71 t Dear Julia: Planning De:,. May ihave a copy of the original application that was submitted by the proposed Day Care Center and a copy of any drawing. ,Thank you, RECEIVED MAR 12 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0/ /ai d 471 72 2-3 c�9 % 3 -/ � 9 From: "Julia Hajduk" <JULIA.COT> To: Patty Date sent: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:58:39 +0000 Subject: notice to Martha Bishop PLease send any new notices regarding the Day care to Martha Bishop. Also please send the notice of appeal extension. Address: 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Patty Lunsford -- 1 -- Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:26:10 A►'r lompti SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: Russ J-oki" _ Company: 7;• ro/-?c w i4��. sax oofs Phone: Fax: 62 _2ZQ� From: fvl q /lq.dQk Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 g cep 7 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: Ara ,5/ 1,91? Pages including this page: 3 COMM ENTS: 44964,1- 1%4 -404f, c-4/7, cflGLyi ' ' %far.✓ k 47,-10// 1244 7I 4&Ye c 04. 11 /Ll /12e fTi►ow jf�v/' j9 4 4i b � r, ��'�c�� i� �SVc�fi��" 9 q PJ7bd AIS /Io/f /7zp . ./9 Chen (' i%o Ls L.-Ls Si . ./.0/m132/ erpesd, &4g .)/ccir;z‘ -4,949/ad../-17a- , c e i /LS hsr AAw-c 7A nks 74,h Mv- kj City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** r—° vQ c l'o1 Aft p \\ 9 •` r ''t , `. MAN SWIM i rM'WM w rLar Asa >art•aaawa ter r.aw WO MW1 IOW \ *11/201% \ . ---.u`s EE \ 1 Tr .. - _._.y..��r�—�--- r , r, — . x 7. �7i- :w rno:snlesr •--#•-----/ ----- "- 1•■rr. +r► '""��_ • ': . .. r!:'�l .. V' w�.K := ._. :• _ art UN b 11 k PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 _ ! 'a ., 1 O f 1� I � AREA=14 567 S .FT. L - . f il AREA-27,936 SQ. 1 / I' sk�- 1 \ \ 1Lar ..,, 1 * 5 • /� C r r -. — M��.y.—. — J � � `. .am., I tif SID am.,,, PROPERTY kis4 pit Wilma s us.wa.. i ',',Ii AIA • GUY=WALE 1..-1 gar-r • MI "" If "" ` ZTeC ENGINEERS, INC. �-- PROPOSED SITE PLAN s.. n +�—— 3737 S.E. 6TH Avg PORTLAND.oR 97202 FOR: WATERLEAF s PNONE: (ao3)23s-57ae CHILDREN'S VILLAGE & DAY SCHOOL Z OF 2 FAX: (303) 233-7689 --- `---— _ ----— --- _ _ __--- ----------------- ------- ---— --- —`-------_--- --- - -- _---- ---- — —. ---- ----- —— - ---------.1siff sm u_L-IE- ----._111614 1111211111gffl_ • • • 4 .v` coo ( -/-- • 6care PROJECT wc // / care _ II PAW • ��//// TAX LOT 7.1e F1 *O!LOCATED N TNT M fi1M.1111 Of WITCH t,mama,.7 scum Y / LINT Or DM YttM7rt•ru DlM4.SHMINOT04 CA)RY.c.YGON C4`946 .)9 of 'V9/ (A/6)5 4 /e/aeq�'"t CO CINITY MAP To �� a�" `j V in. ri9 e 4 7 09er/0c d, q.S.401'e T I r 4.21 (3/26 cAllcigic.) ..... LT II.� DOW MOH K1 coc.PAD At•M. I I —M'IID.lit. • t � OH . DDaa n►.NI ® 1 1 ���^ W1 YOCM Mari A • n n .�p • • o • • w /11/1/ m r `5.— a I I LL –l'-s Frog+w�wD arrrlilw cctalMe :/ d �E �j. �� r•oc as svo reu MDNV.wcv �ti / fA I ! a1J_L.� P tin uoaD ror uv,uvva ala f PLAY ; p4NI 10 IUWH•111.016 s.a YARD i � i w D • . • . / 7 / r I 1 L. 0 At�SITE PLAN fir.>,3 ,„ A lIIregon Department of Environmental Quality Northwest Region Jam. � g ii-v. . John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor 2020 SW Fourth Avenue Suite 400 March 13, 1998 Portland,OR 97201-4987 (503)229-5263 Voice JULIA HAJDUK TTY(503)229-5471 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 RE: Truax Harris#326 File No. 34-92-318 Dear Ms. Hajduk: The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the file for the subject contaminated cleanup site located at 13295 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon as per your telephone request on March 13, 1998. Based on this review,there are two small pockets of petroleum contaminated soil remaining in place, one along and possibly extending under the Park street right-of-way and the other extending along the Pacific Highway right-of-way. Currently,the Department is waiting to receive acknowledgment that the owners of both road right of ways and the current owner of the site are notified of the pending request for no further action for this site. These small pockets of petroleum contamination lie under paved areas. Once the Department is notified that all involved parties are agreeable, it is expected that a formal request to the Department for a no further action determination will be forthcoming. The only stipulation that would likely be made by the Department is that if the contamination becomes accessible due to road work, etc. then it would have to be addressed at that time. Currently, it has been shown that it is not significantly impacting groundwater and is of relatively little concern since it is covered by pavement and so the likelihood of human contact is remote. I trust that this information will be suitable for your purposes. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at(503)229-5493. Sincerely, F, . .�, -_,� Steven L. Hooper of UST Cleanup Specialist cc: Rob Forrest Truax Harris Energy Company PO Box 607 Wilsonville, OR 97070 R. Scott Wallace Kleinfelder, Inc. 15050 SW Koll Parkway Suite L Beaverton, OR 97006-6028 DE¢t 1 igard-Tualatin School LAstrict 23J - Larry Hibbard Administration Center - 13137 S.W.Pacific Highway • Tigard • Oregon • 97223 • (503)620-1620 • FAX(503)684-2296 • http://www.ttsd.kl2.or.us Board of Directors RECEIVED PLANNING Merrily Ham,Chair Al Hieb.Vice Chair MAR 2 0 1998 Richard Carlson Torn Sharp Patricia Biggs CITY OF TIGARD Superintendent Russell Joki,Ed.D. March 16, 1998 Associate Superintendent Maryahce RusseN,Ed.D. Business Manager George Asher Director of Human Resources Pete Loran Director of Staff Development Julia Hajduk Marilyn Adair City of Tigard Director of Student Services Planning Division Petrea Hagen-Gilden 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Scott Baker,�i ; l RE: MLP 97-0019: Children's Village Day Care Center Byrom Elementary Hwy 99W X Park Street John Horn,Principal Charles F.Tigard Elementary Thank you for the information regarding the above proposed Jim Pierce,Principal development. Dees Creek Elementary The School District wishes to express its concern about traffic and Vanessa Bunker.Principal p Durham Elementary pedestrian safety. Kip Gladder,Ph.D.,Principal TRAFFIC: Our experiences with after school day care Metzger Elementary providers suggests that traffic can be heavy unless the operator Ed McVicker,Principal p gg 1� is offering transportation. The traffic plan should prohibit left turn Templeton Elementary exits onto Park. Park is a narrow street without sidewalks and Nancy Longaket Principal left turns could easily obstruct dangerous situations. Additionally, Tualatin Elementary the potential for vehicle stacking on Park Street needs to be Fred Puhl,Principal addressed as well. Mary Woodward Elementary Art Rutkin,Principal PEDESTRIAN SAFETY: Signage and a crosswalk should Fowler Middle School be added to increase driver awareness of children in the area who Susan Cale.Principal will be leaving the center or walking to/from Charles F.Tigard. I Hazelbrook Middle School have heard the arguments over crosswalks,but I still support them Vickie For les,Principal as a worthwhile pedestrian alert. Twality Middle School Jim Wasson,Principal Sincerely, Tigard High School Mark Kubiaczyk,Principal Tualatin High School R sell A. Joki Larry Pettersen,Principal Superintendent of Schools 21st Century Academy Jennifer Nelson.Director Aquatic Centers Mike Branam,Director Our commitment is to educate every student to be a successful and responsible contributor in our changing world." ,0:,-17%93 TUE 15:54 FAX 503 6°° 2296 TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL 0001 fax Tigard-Tualatin School District 13137 SW Pacific Highway Cover Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel. (503) 620-1620 Fax (503) 684-2296 Letter (if you have any trouble receiving this transmittal, please contact us) Date: 3-17- ng `1 To: 1-1OddaL Company: 0.1;h6 rrd., Fax #: • 10 4 'f" 7a 97 From: I&5SS0 , 04-aao! Name Phone # Pages: Originals being mailed ❑ No originals to follow (incl. cover sheet) Regarding: Confidentiality Notice: This facsimile transmission may contain confidential and privileged information. The information contained in this transmission is intended for thc addressee ONLY. If you are not thc addressee of this facsimile, please do not review, disclose, copy or distribute it. If you have received this transmission by mistake. please telephone us immediately. Thank you! .03'17/98 TUE 15:54 FAX 503 65 • 2296 TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL 0 002 Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J - Larry Hibbard Administration Center - 13137 S.W.Pacific Highway • Tigard • Oregon • 97223 • (503)620-1620 • FAX(503)684-2296 • http://www.ttsd,kl2.or,us Board of Directors Mersey How.Chair Al Kee,vice Chair Richard Colson Tom snap Patricia Biggs Russell EdD March 16, 1998 Associate Superintendent Maryauce Russel RID. Dueness Manager George Fisher Director of Hunan Resources Pete Larch Director of Staff Development Julia Hajduk Marilyn Adak City of Tigard Dkectaof Student Services Planning Division °eOHog den 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 s"ipor RE: MLP 97-0019: Children's Village Day Care Center � � Hwy 99W X Park Street Bake(Principal Byrom John Hom.Principal Thank you for the information regarding the above proposed Charles F,TigardBBernentary development. Jim Pierce,Principal P v ssa l The School District wishes to express its concern about traffic and Durham Bemenfory pedestrian safety. Kip Gfadde(PF D.,Ptlnc ipal TRAFFIC: Our experiences with after school day care Metzger Elementary providers suggests that traffic can be heavy unless the operator McVidcet Principal is offering transportation. The traffic plan should prohibit left turn lempleton Elementary exits onto Park. Park is a narrow street without sidewalks and Nancy Longaket Fenopal left turns could easily obstruct dangerous situations. Additionally, Tualatin Elementary the potential for vehicle stacking on Park Street needs to be Red Punt Principal addressed as well. Mary Woodward Elementary AnRU'fan Principal PEDESTRIAN SAFETY: Signage and a crosswalk should Fowler Middle School be added to increase driver awareness of children in the area who Susan Carle.Principal will be leaving the center or walking to/from Charles F. Tigard. I Hazetrook MlddIeScheid have heard the arguments over crosswalks, but I still support them Vickie Fones.Principal as a worthwhile pedestrian alert. TwaMy Wide school Jim Wasiorr'FtIncipal Sincerely, Tigard High School . Mark Kutboczyk Principal Tualati r, h R issell A. Joki School Lorry Penersen Principal Superintendent of Schools 21st Century Academy JemIler Ne6cti.Director Aquatic Centers Mire Brava ii.Director Our commitment is to educate every student to be a successful and responsible contributor in our changing world" /,`L T/OM /4/,'¢c/ 'Ql.� �9i9 � r�s .�s.61� J r J /� / deg/7/%� 7 t o/d 770/9X f79rr/S .Si 6 f %S `C044,S. */ cSd/sdeg/2 Q'40W d 4SASe fr/ 9 w1/ 9 . o re n 14i% C4n 4m,n9/10 /: iaC 1,/k fir 7 1 4 l/ Oq S, / ISO/ o� iN4S // ake_0 /o1 4 0'2 she nn ll 4 G✓erC< / i 00/2f4,Y7/A91/42.I ECG Gej darA•4 1/5 f{ Clc9/, /7/ /., 406%5c 5 LdI- (o.Gtr,7s. X quc 9n y l�v�Si a/I S 1t l A.e ?!S TT59 ( 4f 7 // G✓il��L OY� v967gl on Ord /944- „di Azta 1 City of Tigard community Development Sharing A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Gus Duenas ti FROM: Julia Powell Hajduk 77 COPIES TO: Brian Rager, Jim Hendryx, Martha Bishop, Russell Joki DATE: March 18, 1998 SUBJECT: Need for Cross walk near intersection of Park Street and Highway 99W In response to some concerns raised by citizens in this neighborhood, would you consider doing an evaluation to determine the need for a cross walk near the intersection of Park Street and Grant Street. The concern is for the safety of children walking down Park Street to get to Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. The proposed daycare site on Park Street (SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019) requires the construction of a sidewalk and will increase traffic onto Park Street. There is concern that children will choose to take the sidewalk and then not have a safe place to cross the street to get to Grant Street. Please consider these concerns and, if warranted, consider placing any necessary improvements on the CIP. /39 zs , i'll v 6/LR✓1 1 4116J4 C.Anj" 15 fC‘i 1124,1745c14$1.44- 4Ik 14-/eWm/ Du9,, .g A1-4-v- -• eve L 7/4„ri„,_./4„,,,,t, r i PvJd1 s 13 f ZZ 9 - 54/7 ,5,-x•5 3y-92--03/ g eilfiElfsgE 1„ cl‘`j V. .��,,dPD411 . e111 _ J IF g.2 Lici.2.- 4 A cc 2 "NOTICE OF Air ED DECISION FINAL APPEL'- -'1TE" tr: HIBITA SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR) 97-0011/ =� - ';-_MINOR LAND PARTITION [MLP] 97-0019 :.. ; �- com 1'uutyDevelopment CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Shnpin9;�Better Community Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has EXTENDED the appeal date for the previous Notice of Amended Decision to allow for publication in the Oregonian Newspaper. The Conditions of Approval remain the same. The decision will be final ten (10) days after this notice is published as per Section 18.32.120 of the Tigard Development Code. THE NEW FINAL APPEAL DATE IS MARCH 26, 1998 AT 3:30 P.M. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel referred to as Parcel 1 on proposed partition site plan. APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 01805. LI J. mil,«�` 40 r � � ./ .1-r;-� --1� sib►litill_l_p -,77, _, • . ..- 7 1--'4 Li- I- 1._Flin IA i _L1 t 'mkt_ 1---awes, , Y - - -A i ,vA N - >„. ,,,,,.: ,,,,,\ . . v . # , _.■,, ....2 ..„... ,.... __ :-_ _ HIL ti,qt, N \a,„ 41, ,,,s, . „ , _____ -,.. --51% fit. -1 i.,i, _ Agole 0 • • . ., i c 7.,i_7-,0)- „117.%. hie-o. %, . S'.)( t•' . AVc)/,A C SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION APPEAL DATE Jim Hendryx Community Development Directcr City of Tigard 24 March 1998 Re: Day Care on Park Dear Mr. Hendryx: I want to thank you for your assistance and Julia Hajduk's follow through on the issues which were of concern. We appreciate your efforts and hope that the new process the City is pursuing to assure early neighborhood involvement will eliminate the problems of the current process. I have sent out flyers to all the Park Street neighbor's. They look forward to the City addressing our concern for school age children by placing a designated crosswalk on Park Street at the Grant Street intersection. Jim I would hope that as part of your future process that you will require more complete applications be provided by the Applicants and that historical information is easier for the planners to be aware of. Also I would strongly suggest that when the Applicant holds a neighborhood meeting that the neighbors who are directly adjacent to a subject property be sent a copy of the pre-application notes and that additional copies be available at the neighborhood meeting, so that all parties inv91vel pi h ve ttpe same information to work with. This will also provide the neighbors.?`let tte itty or Applicant know historical information that has been missed or inform them of items unique to the- site if they exist. Again I want to thank you for yours and Julia's response to our concerns. Sincerely, artha Bisho *Note Chas. F. Tigard Grade School is within the l; mile of this neighborhood aware of the school rule "if living within l- mile the students shall walk -no school bus is provided. " Many local parents worrying about increased heavy traffic are either driving their child to school or having designated parents to walk groups to and from school daily. cc: Supt. of School Dist. 23J - Mr. Russ Joki RECEIVED PLANNING ~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION MAR 2 41998 WHARTON CITY OF T{GARD I , BEING FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSE AND SAY THAT I AM THE PRINCIPAL CLERK OF THE PUBLISHER OF THE OREGONIAN , A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION , AS DEFINED BY ORS 193 . 010 AND 193 . 020 , PUBLISHED IN THE CITY OF PORTLAND , IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY , OREGON : THAT THE ADVERTISEMENT , THE PRINTED TEXT OF WHICH IS SHOWN BELOW , WAS PUBLISHED IN THE ENTIRE AND REGULAR ISSUES OF THE OREGONIAN FOR 1 DAYS STARTING 03/ 16/98 , ENDING 03/ 16/98 / ,Pr . . . �-:1 e:_ . rl�l ' PRINCIPAL CLERK OF THE PUBLISHER MAR 18 1998 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DATE r. f 0 OFFICIAL SEAL SHIRLEY KALHAR ". NOTARY PUBLIC-ORE60N ;�.- COMMISSI9N NO. 033921 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28, 1998 //4/ , NOTARY : ./ , v ' ' 642140 AD TEXT : NOTICE @NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION AND EXTENDED APPEAL DATE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ( SDR ) 97-0017/MINOR LAND PARTITION ( MLP ) 97-0019 CHILDREN ' S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER@ @The Director has amended , this decision to correct factual errors and to further specify reasons for certain improvement require ments . however , there was no change to the original conditions of approval . The request is for Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two ( 2 ) parcels of 27 , 936 and 14 , 567 square feet each and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6 , 500 square foot day care center on the eastern most parcel . =mLOCATION : =m The subject site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway ( 99W) and SW Wat kins Avenue ; WCTM 2S102CB , Tax Lot 01805 . =mZONE : General Commercial District ; C-G . =m The purpose of the C-G zone is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive- in ser vices , large space users , a combination of retail , service , whole_ sale, and repair services , or provide services to the public rang ing from automobile repair and services , supply and equipment stores , vehicle sales , and drive- in restaurants to laundry estab lishments ; and it is intended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street . =mAPPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA : =m Community Development Code Chapters 18 . 62 , 18 . 100 , 18 . 102 , 18 . 106 , 18 . 108 , 18 . 116 , 18 . 120 , 18 . 150 , 18 . 162 and 18 . 164 . @ @The adopted finding of facts , decision , and statement of conditions can be obtained from the mning Division , Tigard C Center , 13125 $i'W Hall Boulevard, , .gard , Gregon 97223 . The de, , sion shall be final on =mMARCH 26 , 1998 . =m Any party to the deci sion may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18 . 32 . 290 ( A ) and Section 18 . 32 . 340 of the Community Development Code , which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten ( 10 ) days after notice is given and sent . The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3 : 30 =mMarch 26 , 1998 . =m@ =mPUBLISH DATE : March 16 , 1998=m 221-8000 THE OREGONIAN, MONDAY, MARCH 16, 1998 Public Notices 81 Public Notices 81 PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC STORAGE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS HILLSDALE TERRACE SALE DATE:MARCH 21 1998 JOB NO.M6-0500 8•30 A.M. - 2190 NW Burnside, 1.1..-....------.....-i 8 Gresham: Bryn Biiev-F013 Sealed bids will be received of the ' Byron Evans-D037, Michael Housing Authority of Portland Brooks-0072 Kelly Hall-E009, (HAP),8910 N.Woolsey Avenue YOUR Public Notices 8� Perry Luarch-E029,Rafael Bar- Portland,Oregon 97203,until 2:06 rero-E060,Shane Sanders-J030 p.m.,Thursday April 16,1998 for FAMILY'S 9:00 A.M.-2600 NW Burnside Cl, labor,materials,and services to Gresham:Krisfi Schoff-A031 construct a single story educa- 9:15 A.M.-1421 E Powell Blvd, tonal and administrative facility GROWN... NOTICE OF Gresham: Shelly Uptain-8174, located within the Columbia Villa • Marlie Wyatt-8310 district.Shorthly thereafter,bids I PUBLIC HEARINGS ON 9:30 A.M - 2730 NW Division, will be opened and publicly read. �__ Gresham: Barbara Dzame- No bidder may withdraw their FY 1998 ACTION PLAN si-8011, Derrick Avery-0034, bid after the hour set for opening I-1 Antoine Golden-0097, Cynthia until after the lapse of sixty(60) t Washington County Cortez-C152 days from the bid opening. \` 9'P5 A.M. - 2rry SE 105 Ave, Hillsdale Terrace consists of 60 3 //:l and City of Beaverton Portland:-Kerry Kresa-E033, Washington County and the City of Ronald Chipman-F032, Teresa bedroom apartments in 8 2 and 3 Beaverton will hold the following Miller-0019, Ivan Schar- story masonry buildings. The public hearings to listen to cifi- brough-8020, Brian Gal- basic work will include but not zens'views on the proposed use lagher-0044,Arien Marcus-0098, be limited to Demolition and - of Community Development Lee Delaino-D064, Dana renovation at trash enclosures, 4488 Block Grant(CDBG),HOME In- Schell-D075, Van Gre- installation of new mailbox vestment Partnerships, and gorev-E031 Diane Roady-E057 kiosks, Painting of all exterior Emergency Shelter Grants Darren Kilborn-E080, Michael building walls, attached vents ESG1 Program funds in FY Combs-F080 and guard rails etc. New closet AND GONE • i, doors at designated units, New 998: 10:15 A.M.-1608 NE 92,Portland: 8_i David Garner-A066, Robert THEIR Wednesday April 1,1998,230 pm Fouts-0014, tair rails at designated units,Linda King-0081, New exhaust fans at designated umber. WAY Washington County Juvenile Ben Smith-D015 Barbara units, New electric base board Services Building,Room 105 Himes-A054,Cheryl Ross-0002 units at designated units, New 111 NE Lincoln Street,Hillsboro 10:45 A.M. - 8928 NE Halsey, kitchen cabinets at designated Portland: Sames Restick-8032, units, Renovation of inferior •• Thursday April 2 1998 6:30 pm Larry McDonald-D091, Tina bathrooms kitchen and cl ass - Beav rton tity Flail, Mitchell-D122, Joyce Hemmer- room at tfie day care facility, e New awning at the day care fa- Conference Room A tang-0140,Frank Parker-P011 citify Installation of exhaust and . 1 ti/' 4755 SW Griffith Drive,Beaverton 11:00 A.M.-1621 NE 71,Portland: intake fans and new heating at E$ \\ Eric Hayden-A052, Deborah day care facility. Birth meeting rooms are access- Smith-A185, Kim Baldwin-A242, ible to people with mobility im- Beckie Granville-A373, Derek Bid Documents are available at ers. airments. Please notify the Fleener-D014,Sheila Pettit-F004, the HAP Office noted above. A Ilation. Washington County Department John McAvalon-F002 $50(fifty)deposit for one set and of Housing Services at least 1 11:30 A.M.-7402 SE 92,Portland: $20(twenty)for each additional days before a hearing if special B.C. Disselbrett-0021, Tammy set is refundable when docu- 10,000: equipment or interpreting set- Vogel-D073, Chris McCrack- ments are returned within 10 5 vices is desired. Dean Wood D261 D'Arcy-D197, days after bid opening. r n10,000: SO SELL Acton Plan 12 NOON 11485 SE 82 Ave, Attendance of bidders is requested Portland: Michael Mathis-0002, at a pre-bid meeting of the 44.52 YOUR The public comment draft of the Dan F.Paine McBee-0004,Nissa Protect commencing at 6775 S.W. Washington County and City of Meier-5058, William Mill- 26th Ave.,Portland,Or.,at 1000 •1 HOME... Beaverton FY 1998 Action Plan ere-E085,Vickey Terry F002 Ro- a.m.,Thursday,March 31,1998. describes how the County and bert Brust-F014, Mike Alan- Questions posed during the I the City expect to use federal chard-F070 meeting, not addressed in the housing and community devel- 12:30 P.M.-11800 S.E.40th Ave, documents,will be answered by f address Milwaukie:Michelle Court-8075, • ES 2 DAYS a4 opmen resources to ad Vass pri- Karl Reimershelle Christine addendum. ority needs and local objectives Kadocchia-0047, Ruthie between July 1, 1998,and June Excecution of an Affidavit of MBE 30, 1999. The two jurisdictions West-0154 addendum. (HAP Form 42.1)is ;t1)/� will invest appproximately $4.2 1245 P.M.-13325 SE Mclough- reggired of each bidder in order million in CDBG, HOME, and tin, Milwaukie. Pete Gil- to this as a qualified bidder ESG funds into an array of hous- baugh-F103 for his work. ing and community development 100 P.M.-17501 S.E.McLough- * activities in FY 1998 to meet the lin,Milwaukie:Paul Willey-8072, The Housing Authority of Portland f3�3 needs of low-and moderate-in- Larry Felgar-0079,Edward Ra- meYY-0170, Sheila Van may reie with any bid not in com- ections: come families.Specific informs- Meter-D311 y-027, pliance with the prescribed bid- AX lion on the projects and activities ding procedures and require- listed below are provided in the ments and may reject any or all SALE DATE:MARCH 25 1998 action plan, bids and waive all informalities Friday 8:30 A.M. -9901 SE Ahill Plain if,in the'udgmenl of HAP,it is in Friday AND GO OFF Washington County Blvd, Vancouver, WA Heather the public interest to do so. y •$613,500 for public facilities Hall-E070,Terry Saunders-0191, Questions regarding this protect Monday AND PLAY. • f38�,948 for infrastructure im- Dean Bohanan-0188, Kevin should be directed to H. David Tuesday provements Carlson-F030 Walter at 735-4210. Wednesday •$373,979 for public services 9:00 A.M.-13515 NE Prescott Ct, •$405,000 for housing rehabilifa- Portland: Marie Shetler-A0071 HOUSING AUTHORITY Tammy Wiley-A021, Patti Thursday Lion programs OF PORTLAND Wednesday - •$50,000 for shelter accessibility Huber- lson-8 33, Patti H.David Walter, •$913 915 for affordable housing Huber-Dotson-0142, Albert Da- Assistant Director, Thursday development vis-F049 Housing Operations • $50,600 in operating grants to 9:30 A.M. - 6525 N Lombard, n above tittles. Community Housing Develop- Portland: Frank Banks-8052, ive for deadlines ment Organizations Gregor Woods-8078, Sontosha Cr \� • $86,450 in Emergency Shelter 9:405 A.M.H021921 N Gantenbein, Grants for operations, essential Portland: Samuel Shen- , bservices,and homelessness pre- Portland:, Theresa - vention REGIONAL STRATEGIES The Oregonian i• .5430,630 in contingency and car- son-8071, Ronald Lowery-B091, PROGRAM FOR MULTNOMAH ibility for the a ryover funds Ionia Lollins-B136, Mary Lou AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES corrected - Fuller-8142 Michael Can- City of Beaverton da-B174, Lance Loring 8212 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS t'\ • $250,000 for infrastructure im- Blenda Ryles-8265, Russell provements Dawson-8277 1997-1999 BIENNIUM •$70 950 for public services 10:15 A.M.-3508 SW Moody St, reserves the • 15/,450 for housing rehabilita- Portland:Rene Gonzales-E344 The Multnomah-Washington iron 10:30 A.M. - 7095 SW McEwan, Counties Regional Strategies sion of an Lake Oswego: Michelle Dris- Board is currently seeking pro- blish the The draft FY 1998 Action Plan will kill-0044 posals for potential funding Ot constitute an TIE be available for review, begin- 10:45 A.M.-k.4,3174°SW McEwan, through the State of Oregon Re- ning Tuesday,March 17,1998,at Tigard: Martha Shelly-A039, gtonal Strategies Program. The OREGONIAN all County library branches,the Jerell Rfed-0103 Board has adopted a Regional • Washington County Public Ser- vices 11:00 A.M. - 13473 SW Pacific Strategies Action Plan for Mult- \CLASSIFIEDS. . Building, and Beaverton Hwy,Tigard: Dan Lucero-Cool, nomah and Washington Counties t to this paper.A City Hall.Copies of the plan may Casio Thompson-F023, Levi that identifies specific economic on resentation also be obtained from the De- McGregor-F080, Larry McKen- and industry development obiec- p parfinent of Housing Services by zie-FOBS, David Weaver-G044, fives for projects funded through $40;replies calling(5031 693-4764. Elizabeth Parks-G095 Regional Strategies. Regional 11:30 A.M.-10905 SW Denny d, 1 Strategies is an Oregon State Interested citizens are encouraged Beaverton:Gene Taylor-0039 Lottery funded Program that is • to review the draft plan and pro- 11:45 A.M. - 6500 SW 110th Ct, administered by the Oregon vide their comments and sue- Beaverton: Debra John-8068, Economic Development Depart- ment the and regionally adminis- d Saturday, �\� I" hearings or by writing to the De- Watts-8149, Rene Stinson-B209, tered through the Portland De- partment of Housing Services at Reuba Cumpston-6218, Jon velopment Commission for 111 NE Lincoln Street Suite 200- Taylor-8227 Multnomah and Washington L, Hillsboro, OR 97124 . Public 12:15 P.M.-11995 SW Barnes Rd, Counties. comments on the draft plan will Portland:Lori Haney-B309 be taken through Wednesday, 12:30 P.M. - 19350 SW Shaw, Information regarding the Region- April 15,1998. Aloha:Molly Henry-D163 al Strategies Board process for 12:45 P.M.- 1203 SE TV HWY, Check out Real Estate accepting proposals and the Hillsboro: Brian Schip-For more informatics, contact essary content of the proposals listings t results! listings from Section Todd Adkins, Department of kowitz-F034, John Russell Con- can be requested by calling 102 to 180.Then take a Housing Services,at strudion-G022 823-3199 or by slopping by the (503) 693-4777 or Todd�d- Portland Development Commis- lookTravelion47, kins@co.washingtonor.us SALES SUBJECT TO sion Offices. CANCELLATION.BIDDERS 46`A, Travel& MUST SIGN IN AT EACH Proposals are due no later than I Q LOCATION&ADHERE TO 5:W pm,April 3,1998,and should �� Transportation.Call REGULATIONS.PROVIDE OWN be mailed or delivered to: 221-8000 to place an ad. �* _LOCKS OR BUY OUR LOCKS. John Hall * Regional Strategies Coordinator CLASSIFIED if Portland Development mt___ BUY IT. Commission 1900 SW Fourth Ave Suite 100 Your EVERYDAY Resource. • Portland,Oregon 97201 ( The only local SELL IT. ,P resource that is For questions regarding roposal updated daily. submittal or for copies o the Re- • CALL US TODAY FIND IT gional Strategies Action Plan TO PLACE YOUR AD! Whether you need to r please contact John Hall at(5031 The Oregonian sell a Subaru 823-3199. 'Classifieds'221_8000 or sbue a as wh CLASSIFIED, Oregon toll free 1-800-221-4488 Clasified has what REQUEST FOR you're looking for! Public Notices 8 The Oregonian'Classifieds' QUALIFICATIONS FOR 9uty Aids 579 I •221-8000 r Call The Oregonian 221-8000 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES uipment 562 Toll free in Oregon 1-800-221-4488 Oregon toll free 1-800-221-4488 Installations Division of the Oregon ant 596 Military Department is request- onditioning 505 NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION nsulting5services Design and ctors 535 lowin_g protect PIER•980020 ilaterials 530 AND EXTENDED APPEAL DATE CAMP WITHVCOMBE dent MASTER PLAN 570-571 CITY OF 97-0017 SITE DEVELOPMENT/MINOR LAND ION MILP R97-0019 The scope of work includes but: Ma,Sterling 538J ( ) Complete limited to the following: the ills,Timber 590 , Complete a Master Plan for the ale,Rent 595 Comm7i y SDP" r CHILDREN'S VILLAGE 234 acre National Guard Training Shaping ABCtfCT Community Site known as Camp Withy- ted 593 P ty DAY CARE CENTER combo.The master plan will be developed to reflect existing con- 546 ditions and incorporate construc- Open Time 592 The Director has amended,this decision to correct factual errors and to further specify lion and infrastructure chap es anticipated through 2010. The ing,Forklifts 594 reasons for certain improvement requirements,however,there was no change to the Master Plan will incorporate uti- age Buildings 564 original conditions of approval. The request is for Minor Land Partition approval to lilies,traffic plan studies, street p •r Sale 540 pp re q pp and parking improvements to partition an existing lot into two(2)parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet each and include new roads and storm anted 537 to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot day care lighting and nand ca landscaping,sidewalks. uipment 510 center on the eastern most parcel.LOCATION:The subject site is located on SW Park the National Guard Training Site Fax,Copiers, Street between SW Pacific Highway(99W)and SW Watkins Avenue;WCTM 2S102CB, at Camp Withycombe, Clacka- mas,Oregon. Equipment 571 Tax Lot 01805.ZONE:General Commercial District;C-G.The purpose of the C-G zone Applicants will be evaluated, in ows,Service, is to provide for major retail goods and services such as drive-in services,large space part, on (1) experience with 574 users,a combination of retail,service,wholesale,and repair services,or provide serv- a iects of similar size, corn- xity,an ction,(2t sp Instruments 556 ices to the public ranging from automobile repair and services,supply and equipment ized ten for 572 stores,vehicle sales,and drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments;and it is in- scipline or e Master t 585 tended to be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street.APPLICABLE REVIEW (3) previous satisfactory J major parlance working with multi- -nt 514 CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, e agencies to develop design MISC r p �p and functional use requirements, 18.108,18.116,18.120,18.150,18.162 and 18.164. (4) previous clients satisfaction quipment 512 with firms design work,(5)abili- inoleum 566 - ;y`,•,�N� •� • ty to accomplish the proieds on �,♦ time and with previous history of S 549 - -i • ^ `•,. ♦��4 �I� meeting completion dates and ►► �;`;,�•� p��.• , (6)previous experience as prin- ts 553 �� ►► •_�• , �� cipal design firm on Department rS, \\�P►'►►.•=81`/� •.��♦��� j of Defense (DOD) work with es 558 s► =♦■1►� �� .O �� special emphasis on Army Na- 547 ,1 ♦•.►,6►�1�1(��:�•• . `/ tional Guard Air National uipment 550 0011101 ell =j��♦j�� ,�� ,,�� Guard,Army,fits.Final and Marine � � •'', ' �♦ will b Reserve maieds.elms seeping, 503 �/, 112i44,�� �i, �� will e made after screening, s 536 ►+�'ri �� I ` $ $0.4.4-$1• formal interview,and evaluation. ,ie,i I� i`8 . Fee negotiations will be under- es,VCRs ii _ ��. � taken after selection of a suc- cessful r / • ♦ taken firm and will be based on 1.046,111 ... „ 11_.�1 ` ��•i%,•0t a detailed scope of services. Vier Dec. 563 C: 1 i ,.►t••00,4 0 v► 557 ■ ■u• :■� �`1.i►••\*%.% Qualified firms desiring consider- . �i,` r P49••�``\ sties should submit GSA SF 254 ■ I� ■ ,041• •_" #1 and SF 255 forms for principal OTI V E T�. ♦`•`••'`j, �,, A/E firm and all consultants to ` ••`►,+♦ OREGON MILITARY DEPART- aV���t��t� a •it••► MENT, ATTN: AGI-0 (Roy IMF' KIM VIII_ i1.i 11 ■. k•►` `,`; Swafford), P.O. Box 14350, 1776 er=1' 'd A 7s \��^ ( Militia Way SE.,Salem,Oregon 1-p a 1.'I_ _ �R ■ ♦ ,� 97309-5047.Submittals will not be accepted after April 10,1998. \J The adopted finding of facts,decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the No additional information will be Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center,13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The deci- provided on this project during ides 609 sion shall be final on MARCH 26, 1998.Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in the advertisement period. Pro- actors'Vehicles 686 accordance with Section 18.32.290(A)and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development posals must be based on the in- ( ) ty P, formation provided herein. arvices 602 s Code,which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten(10)days after notice is given Questions regarding this notice 705 1 and sent.The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 March 26,1998. should be direded to Captain tically c PUBLISH DATE:March 16,1998 Stanley Hutchison andgMaintenance• z B Operatjon- ranch Chief 71 n-7Q1 "NOTICE OF AM'dED DECISION FINAL APPEr TE" : HIBIT A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR] 97-0017/ AIX-411' Mr MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 91-0019 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Shaping A Better Community Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has EXTENDED the appeal date for the previous Notice of Amended Decision to allow for publication in the Oregonian Newspaper. The Conditions of Approval remain the same. The decision will be final ten (10) days after this notice is published as per Section 18.32.120 of the Tigard Development Code. THE NEW FINAL APPEAL DATE IS MARCH 26, 1998 AT 3:30 P.M. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION CASES: FILE NAME: CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAYCARE CENTER Site Development Review SDR 97-0017 Minor Land Partition MLP 97-0019 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Minor Land Partition approval to partition an existing lot into two (2) parcels of 27,936 and 14,567 square feet and to obtain Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,500 square foot daycare center on the eastern most parcel referred to as Parcel 1 on proposed partition site plan. APPLICANT: Waterleaf Arch. & Interiors OWNER: Harris Enterprises, Inc. 621 SW Morrison St., S-125 2300 SW 1st Ave., S-104 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: The site is located on SW Park Street between SW Pacific Highway (99W) and SW Watkins Avenue; WCTM 2S102CB, Tax Lot 018/05. ,____ I, .)---: ,,,,_1(s`"-\; " `‘ ' . .-\. '\. *%4 / 4 .17/>/. K _,:v., ' _=[_ LIL . - , - • s/ if ,... ../, , _ ,-,..,,.. . ___, , .,,./. .e-, / ,,, lit t■ —— . 4, - ,..( s-i • fs , 1, � T ,i ; _ - L W. _11 4 ' \ - _ , �� �♦ ETcThI1 "c* v , :5- -:, v" - *A l .1---- - EIT.L.q4- ‘\iir\ Altotal ,r'-',.2./ .V ; : Pi d nit•111 L= IJLt= 5Fr-171_91=34-) 4 , 4 .4wN • 4,;:tx(cvc .... \„. SDR 97-0017/MLP 97-0019 CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DAY CARE CENTER NOTICE OF AMENDED DECISION APPEAL DATE : l>R (/7 ' MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Julia Powell Hajduk ?' FROM: Gus Duenas DATE: April 7, 1998 SUBJECT: Crosswalk on Park Street near Grant Avenue We have evaluated the request for a crosswalk on Park Street near Grant Avenue and have determined that a crosswalk is both unwarranted and undesirable at that location. We offer the following comments in support of our findings: • The Oregon Vehicle Code states that a crosswalk exists at all intersections unless crossing is prohibited by signs. Some of these crosswalks are marked with painted lines,but most of them are not. Pedestrian crosswalk marking is a method of encouraging pedestrians to use a particular location. A marked crossing may not be as safe as an unmarked crossing at the same location. Two painted lines do not provide protection against an oncoming vehicle, and the real burden of safety has to be on the pedestrian to be alert and cautious while crossing any street. • We have marked crosswalks on all four sides of the 4-way stop at the intersection of Park Street and Watkins Street. We encourage pedestrians to cross at the marked crosswalks at this location. We do have a pedestrian path on the north side of Park Street from Grant Avenue to Watkins Street. This path is continuous from Watkins Street to Grant Street and is the walkway intended for use by pedestrians. Installation of a new crosswalk at Grant Avenue would encourage pedestrians to cross at a location where vehicles are not required to stop. We are usually reluctant to install marked crosswalks at mid-block locations since the markings typically give pedestrians a false sense of security at those marked locations. • The new sidewalk proposed for the south side of Park Street will not extend to Watkins Street and should have a barricade installed at the west end of the sidewalk. Pedestrians using the new sidewalk will have leave the walk and traverse the pavement shoulder to reach Watkins Street. Again, the City would encourage all pedestrians to use the pedestrian path on the north side of Park Street. We would not want to encourage pedestrians to use the sidewalk until it is a complete facility. • Finally, and probably most important, the proposed crosswalk would be located in close proximity to the Highway 99W intersection with Park Street. The conflicting vehicular movements in that area, coupled with the traffic generated by the daycare facility, would make a marked crosswalk at the suggested location an extremely risky proposition. Based on our findings, we will not incorporate the suggested marked crosswalk into our Capital Improvement Program. We do have a pedestrian path approved in this fiscal year's CIP which will extend the pedestrian path along Grant Avenue from Park Street to School Street. This project will provide a continuous route from Watkins Street through Park Street and Grant Avenue to Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. If you have any questions or require additional information,please call me. c: Brian Rager Jim Hendryx Martha Bishop Russell Joki 1;1ENG\MIKEM\PARK W ALK.DOC April 8, 1998 t /Dear Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard Planner Attn: City of Tigard Eng. Gus Duenas Subj: Crosswalk on Park St. near Grant Ave. Thank you for your input on the issue of a crosswalk on Park Street near Grant Ave. Pleased that Grant Street will be improved and a safe walking path is planned for walkers. Having attended the developers neighborhood presentation on the auto impact there will be a need for staff to monitor the number of autos arriving and leaving at intervals whereby neighborhood traffic will also be at it' s peak commuter patterns. Know our staff will make whatever adjustments necessary to insure safety of students, pedestrians, and drivers. When the barricade is in place future development along side of the day school will require road improvements and complete the sidewalk up to Watkins and at that time a reassessment on pedestrian safety will be helpful. The number of cars coming and going twice a day ingress-egress to the day care was quoted to be 90 or 95 vehicles at peak hours. You have on record the traffic count for Park St. as it is a 'feeder road' from impacted Gaarde and 99W. Watkins qualified for road relief by installation of speed bumps. Parents at this time are driving their children to Chas. F. Tigard School being law requires students to walk if living within 12 miles. '`ity staff are all professionals and know they will address any future problems as they arise. The 4 way stop on Park and Watkins was necessary with the neighbors now noticing weekly accidents at this site have come to a standstill once this safety feature was put in place. Thank you for addressing this neighborhood issue as few residents were present for the developer's presentation being the City of Tigard notification only extends to 250' . The City of Tigard has made every effort so far to keep our neighborhood traffic under control as our 50 year old residences surround this entire area. Many live alone and are well into their 90' s in fact one Mrs. Alice Treffinger will be 100 years old in August this year. Neighbors from all over the westside use our walking paths and should feel 'secure and safe ' while seeing development compatible and adjacent to residential home sites. City of Tigard has been very attentive to our aged residents as well as bikers, hikers, children who shall walk to school, and those who can drive safely thru our area. Thank you for all your time and expertise to reassure us we are addressing safety issues. cc"Tigard School Dist. Supt. Russell Joki Brian Rager City of Tigard Eng. Gus Duenas City of Tigard Planing Dir. Jim Hendryx Tigard Times Reporter - Kari Hastings-Arguedas Max Williams, Candidate for House Rep. of our Dist. Brent Bishop, Project Advisor 1 June 16, 1998 Julia Hajduk City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Children's Village Day School (SDR# 97-0017 / MLP# 97-0019) Enclosed are revised plans for Children's Village Day School on SW Park Street in Tigard. The following comments address the site development review conditions of approval. 1. Landscape plan has been revised to include one additional parking lot tree. See sheet L1. 2. Vision clearance triangle is indicated on sheet C2; revised landscape plan L1 includes verification form landscape architect. 3. Pride Disposal Co. has approved dumpster location - see attached partial plan. 4. Number of classrooms provided on site plan. See sheet Al. its igTitirig_=gl. _1nc1u- ed�`o�r t e'plan: e -6. Access ramp is outside of aisle. See sheet Cl. 7. Final Plat Application submitted by ZTec Engineers (Civil). 8. Civil Engineer to provide recorded mylar copy of plat. 9. Civil Engineer has handed in public improvement plans to Engineering Department. 10. Corporate entity responsible for executing compliance agreement for public improvements: Jumbo Fernando Children's Village Day School 17549 Oak Meadows Lane Lake Oswego, OR 97034 636-7825 • 11. General note regarding construction vehicle parking added to site plan. See sheet Al. Architecture 12. Half-street improvements to be built according to plans. 621 S.W. Morrison 9 I n t e r i o r s `11(� /"[ 1 E R L E A F Suite 125 Portland, OR 97205 LAtFax:503/273-8891 Phone: 503228.7571 do\tc, — Y\AY\S \\q\\- O 7 Subsm,, ed` aQto.( cD0A■ cotc-izt 4to+M,1 04`x)"- �..10\c .D. c r ' 13. Profile of SW Park street included in Civil drawings - see sheet C3. 14.Driveway location changed to existing gravel driveway location. See civil drawings. 15. Parking lot plan revised to include new driveway location. See site plan, sheet Al, civil drawings. 16. Contractor will apply for water service along with building permit. 17. Fee in-lieu of on-site water quality facility to be paid along with site permit. (water quality: $7,755.71 water quantity: $2,308.25) 18. Erosion control plan included on Civil drawings - see sheet Cl. Sincerely, WaterLeaf Architecture & Interiors pcat iglikfc4k, Dick Aanderud Partner cc: Brian Rager �• 04,:79/98 12:58 503 625 6179 O4/09•'93 11:53 2'503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL X 002'002 04/79/98 09:45 WATERLEAF ARCHITECTURE a 6256179 I'i1.:•�'` I . :: , { s :1 . i 4 ; 5 ` J G. a -4 ..J .E CL : I-.ZN, 1 ...7..... t j T o I , i ..„:„............„...■. ■ . : '41 ,... thil ...:___________.---- ,..1. .3 • -.1 .7.................„,----- 4_ r 4 • y �� a ZZ LZ /r 0Z Alkt ' fi1 - I . .mc Nil O G .€ Lt.— i r . , • • • c i.. I ..i...} \ 1 .ry I• t ' r =MI•, 1 i :. - - a i I _ 1 i Pacific Hwy. Children's Village Day School Tigard, Oregon • WaterLeaf Architecture & Interiors April 2, 1998 Outline Specifications The following information includes the basic requirements for the materials and finishes for the Pacific Hwy. Children's Village Day School. The General Contractor and / or his subcontractors should provide samples of all finishes for the owner to select the final colors. Contractor to match the level of quality and completeness at the existing Children's Village Day School on Mill Plain Street in Vancouver, Washington for finishes and workmanship. All Work must conform to applicable codes and governmental agency requirements for the City of Tigard and State of Oregon. PROJECT REQUIREMENTS /NOTES: A. Contractor to file for, pay for, and obtain all necessary permits required for the work of this project. Owner will reimburse the contractor for permits and fees. Post the original permit on the premises, and submit a copy to the Owner. B. Comply with all requirements of the City of Tigard in the execution of the work. C. Prior to submission of final bids, visit the site to become familiar with the work area and the conditions under which the work is to be carried out. D. Prior to start of work comply with the following: 1. Obtain final working drawings and Outline Specifications. 2. Submit a list of subcontractors for review with the owner. 3. Attend coordination meeting with owner and Architect to determine suitable staging area for materials, temporary utilities and toilet facilities, safety precautions and procedures, rubbish removal and scheduling. E. At start of work, field verify all conditions. Report any discrepancies between actual conditions and the drawings to the architect before proceeding. F. Schedule and coordinate the work of all trades required for this project. G. Coordinate requirements for temporary facilities for power, communication, lighting, water, sanitary facilities, and barricades, etc. H. Maintain roadways and keep them free of debris so that the construction of project does not effect neighborhood traffic. I. Within the cost of the project, include the cost of site security provisions. Pacific Hwy. Children's Village Day School Outline Specifications Page 2 Site Work: A. Provide four (4) inch thick concrete sidewalk around building as shown on drawings. Provide expansion and control joints as required. B. Contractor to provide landscaping and irrigation around exterior of building at areas shown on the landscape drawings. Exterior Finishes: A. Wall Assembly - Provide HardiPlank siding, painted with 6" exposure. Provide necessary wood trim as shown on drawings. Provide Tyvek air infiltration barrier over plywood sheathing on 2 x 6 studs at 16" on center. Final exterior color to be selected by Architect. Exterior soffit: provide exterior soffit board installed with stainless steel screws and painted with two coats of exterior latex enamel. B. Roof- Provide composition asphalt shingles with 25-year warranty; 15 pound roofing felt; plywood sheathing (see structural notes); premanufactured roof trusses at 24 on center. Provide pre finished galvanized gutters, downspouts, and flashing. C. Windows—Provide vinyl clad (white) wood windows at sizes shown on drawings. Manufacture—Milgard, Viking, or approved by Architect. Glass to be solar grey, double glazed, insulated. D. Exterior Doors - Steel doors with hollow metal frames, painted. All doors to have full upper glazing as shown on drawing. Front door, vestibule door and sidelights to be anodized aluminum storefront with standard white "Duranar" finish, lockable. All exterior doors to have the necessary hardware including locksets, hinges, closers, and weatherstripping. E. Insulation —Provide rigid insulation (R-10) at concrete slab perimeter extended 24" under slab; foiled face batt insulation (R-19) at all exterior walls and unfaced batt insulation (R-30) at attic. Interior Finishes: A. Walls: 5/8" gypsum board, painted typically with 2 coats latex semi-gloss enamel. Provide 5/8" type 'X' where required by code for one-hour walls. Provide 5/8" water resistant gypsum board at pool area and shower area. Paint pool area walls and ceiling with oil base enamel. Provide blocking as required. Wood blocking to be fire retardant treated, and where in contact with concrete, preservative treated. Wood to be S4S, KD. Pacific Hwy. Children's Village Day School Outline Specifications Page 3 B. Ceilings: 1) 5 /8" Type 'X' gypsum board, painted typically with 2 coats latex satin enamel. 2) Ceiling to be suspended lay-in 2' x 4' metal grid with 3/4" lay-in acoustical board. Board to be non-directional fissured board or equal. C. Carpet: 24 oz. yarn weight,jute backing only. Provide reducer strips where carpet meets dissimilar floor materials. Provide Superba-Lok II walk off mat at entry vestibule. D. Sheet vinyl: Armstrong, commercial grade or equal. Install sheet vinyl with cove base and no seams at all restrooms. Provide 4" rubber base, Flexco or equal in other areas. E. Interior Windows: 1/4" clear tempered glass in metal frames. G. Wood Doors: Solid core with metal frames to meet corridor construction requirements. Provide closers as needed. Finish to be stained and lacquered. Hardware to meet ADA requirements. Brushed stainless finish. H. Provide horizontal blinds at all exterior windows and interior window to office. Riviera. by Levelor, or equal. I. Cabinets: Plastic laminate finish on exterior including counter tops and backsplashes. Provide stainless steel sinks as indicated on drawings. Provide double sink at kitchen. Cabinets must be locking. Provide shop drawings for approval before any construction. Exterior Areas: Playground area: A. Outdoor Playground Equipment: Provide allowances as determined by owner and include in bid price. B Surface to be 3" of redwood chips. Verify with owner. (NO Fir chips or sawdust will be accepted). C. Provide 6' cyclone fence around entire playground area as shown on drawings. Provide redwood slats in fence at all sides. Provide swinging gate as indicated on the drawings for access to play area. Pacific Hwy. - Children's Village Day School Outline Specifications Page 4 The following equipment is required: 1. Alarm System, Intercom - ( type and style responsibility of Owner) 2. Toilet accessories: Provide toilet paper dispensers, paper towel dispensers, soap dispensers, mirrors, and grab bars as required. Contractor to verify quantities. 4. Swimming Pool Equipment and accessories. 6. Washer & Dryer: Whirlpool - Heavy Duty. 7. Water Heaters: 2 water heaters, Gas, 50 gallon capacity. 8. Dishwasher: Hobart UM 5C. (verify) 9. Range: 30" drop-in with hood vented to outside. 10. Refrigerator: 17 cu ft frost free. 11. Microwave: Selected by tenant. 12. Seven (7) ABC Fire Extinguishers - 10g. 13. Provide chalkboards and tackboards in each classroom as provided at Existing Day School. Location to be provided by lessee prior to bidding. 14. Provide garbage enclosure for 4 yd dumpster as indicated on the drawings to match exterior building material and finish. Provide cyclone gates with redwood vertical slats. 15. Furnish and install 100 metal coat hooks, double anchor type in hallways with shelf above. Install mat hooks in classrooms. Verify location with tenant. 16. Signage and installation - responsibility of Tenant. Pacific Hwy. - Children's Village Day School Outline Specifications Page 5 Mechanical and Electrical Design: Contractor to provide design build and construction for a complete mechanical and electrical system to match the level of quality and completeness at the existing Mill Plain — Children's Day School in Vancouver, WA. Arrange site visits with Owner. General Items: I. Electrical outlets to be 8" above counters typically. Other outlets to be 42" above finished floor in classroom and children spaces. Provide outlets at each wall in office, normal code height. 2. Place fire alarm pull stations at maximum height code will allow. 3. Provide subcontractor's drawing indicating location of telephone and electrical outlets. Coordinate and review with owner prior to installation. 4. Provide 4 hose bibs at exterior of building. See plans for locations. 5. Light fixtures: see drawings for type and location. /PiC PROJECT MEMORANDUM TO/FIRM: Julia Hajduk FROM: Rachel B. Silbert / WaterLeaf Architecture DATE: February 22, 1999 PROJECT: Children's Village Day School SUBJECT(S): landscaping modifications REMARKS: Response to items #1-11, Site Development Review Modification Procedures: 1. The proposal does not involve a residential development, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 2. The proposal does not involve a residential development, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 3. No change has been made that requires additional on-site parking, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 4. No change in occupancy type is proposed, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 5. No change in height is proposed, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 6. The proposed change to the parking area does not affect off-site traffic. 7. There will be no change in vehicular traffic due to the proposed modification, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 8. There is no change in floor area proposed, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 9. There is no area reserved for common open space, therefore this criterion is not applicable. 10. The landscaping has been modified to accommodate a retaining wall as shown on the attached site plan. The south parking lot aisle has been reduced by 3' to allow more landscaping along the southern edge of the site. This compensates for the landscaping that was removed adjacent to the retaining wall as shown. The resulting landscaping for the site is over 15% of the total site as required. 11. Not applicable. COPIES: File 0 A r c 11 l t e c t n r e 621 S.W. Morrison & Interiors E R L E A F Suite 125 Portland,OR 97205 Fax: 503/273-8891 Phone:503/228-7571 „,,,,,,,.•••„•••y%•.....................•................ . .......... .4 .. 1 . _ ..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ! Li\-1 ',::,.','4: ill et,;„,i 11 1” I w I m ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,;:yrr// II 111 17 a S 1 fir A i ��;>•j, M \ \ \_• 0 „ I ■ LANDSCAPING REMOVED AT RETAINING `\° LANDSCAPING INCREASED ALONG WALL AT SOUTI-4 AND EAST EDGES SOUTI-ERN EDGE OF PARKING TOTAL SITE AREA: 21,930 SF 1S LANDSCAPING: 4,190 SF LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 4,300 SF R f.,k March12, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON John Klune 12370 Duchilly Court Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Minor Modification for Children's Village Daycare Dear Mr. Klune: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to modify the landscaping and to alter the location of the trash receptacle at the Children's Village Daycare located at 10400 SW Park Street. The landscaping is being altered to allow for a retaining wall and fence along the southern and western property boundary. Because the landscaping proposed along the southern and western property boundaries would become located in the play area, the applicant felt it important to remove the proposed landscaping from this area to insure the landscaping was not destroyed and that children did not harm themselves. The proposed revision provides an increase in landscaping adjacent to the southern portion of the parking lot. The property received Site Development Review approval for the Children's Village Daycare March 6, 1998 (SDR 97- 0017). This property is zoned General Commercial (CG). The use of the site as a daycare is listed as a permitted use for this zoning district. The Tigard Community Development Code Site Development Review Section states that if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, the request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application. Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not include the addition of any dwelling units. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve the addition of residential dwelling units, as previously indicated. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal is to alter the location of the trash enclosure and adjust the landscaping due to the need for a retaining wall and fence; therefore, there will be no need for additional on-site parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structure of the building is proposed. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Page 1 of 3 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No change in the height of any building is proposed. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to, and from the site, and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The proposed modification will not result in an increase in vehicular traffic to or from the site. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. No increase in floor area is proposed. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent. The location of the existing dumpsters will be replaced with landscaping; therefore, the placement of the trash compactor will result in an increased amount of landscaping or open space. 10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreational facilities; Screening; and/or, Landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan. The applicant's plan modifies the landscaping by removing the landscaping on the southern and western property line adjacent to the building, but increasing the landscaping adjacent to the southern parking lot to an 8-foot wide landscape bed. Doing this will reduce the access aisle to 22 feet, however, the plans show that the access is one-way. Provided the parking lot is striped one-way, this reduction in access width is acceptable. The site will still have more than 15 percent landscaping after this modification. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval which are not the subject of B. 1 through 10 above. The proposal will not violate any conditions imposed at the time of the Site Development Review. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site, provided some conditions are met. The Director's designee has determined that, provided the conditions are satisfied, the proposed minor modification will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . Submit confirmation that the parking lot is intended to be one-way and will be striped accordingly. A condition will be attached requiring that the parking lot be striped "one- way" prior to final occupancy. 2. Submit written sign-off from the waste hauler regarding the location of the trash receptacle. Page 2 of 3 This letter will be placed in the land use file and is considered part of the approved plan. Any further modifications to the approved plan must be reviewed and approved as well. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171 . Sincerely, J K "-Julia Powell Hajdu Associate Planner is\curplan\juiia\minmod\children's village.doc c: Rachel Silbert, 621 SW Morrison, Suite 125, Portland, OR 97205 1999 Planning correspondence file SDR 97-0017 land use file Page 3 of 3