SDR1997-00012 SDR97 - 00012
RHEE DENTAL
OFFICE
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR) 97-0012 CITY OF IGARD
Community Development
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE Shaping A Better Community
120 DAYS = 2/11/97
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASE NO(S).: FILE NAME: RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0012
PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to
convert an existing dwelling unit into an office for a dental laboratory.
APPLICANT: Paul Rhee OWNER: Same
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment; MUE.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment; MUE.
LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 01100. The site is
located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue between SW Atlanta and
SW Baylor Streets.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards;
and the MUE Zoning Standards.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee
has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval.
The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 1 OF 16
CONDITIONS OF APPROVI..
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
(Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager,
Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.)
1 . A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project.
Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings
shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once
redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall
then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost
estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to
public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard
Public Improvement Design Standards which are available at City Hall.
2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall
be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and
providing the financial assurance for the public improvements.
3. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue.
The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:
A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet
(Tigard Triangle Standards);
B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing
edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage;
C. curb or curb and gutter;
D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey
subsurface runoff;
E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk;
F. street striping;
G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer;
H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu
of undergrounding existing overhead utilities);
street signs (if applicable);
J. driveway apron (if applicable); and
K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th
Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department.
4. Submit a profile of SW 69th Avenue extending 300 feet on either side of the subject
site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade.
5. Obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for any proposed water
connections prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit.
6. If the applicant/property owner can demonstrate that the existing on-site sanitary
sewer septic system is functioning adequately to serve the new use, the City will allow
the continued use of the system provided that the applicant/property owner pays a
fee in-lieu of constructing off-site sanitary sewer improvements for the site. The fee
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 2 OF 16
will be based on ar. .igineer's estimate of the cost to ex,_.id public sanitary sewer to
the area surrounding the site. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of the site
and/or building permits.
7. Submit documentation from a design engineer, for review by the City (Brian Rager),
of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed
development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system
downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the
proposed development site constitutes 10% or less of the total tributary drainage
volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile.
8. If the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or culvert is
surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the
developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility.
9. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave the proposed
development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or
dwellings, the downstream storm water system must be enlarged to relieve the
identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an
on-site detention facility.
10. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based
on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. The
applicant will need to provide area calculations to the Engineering Department in
order to calculate the fee. The fee is equal to $180.00 for every 2,640 square feet of
new impervious area.
11 . Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan
shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical
Guidance Handbook, February 1994."
12. Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 69th Avenue underground as
a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be
calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be
$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to a final
building inspection.
13. Submit a landscape plan prepared by a landscape architect that includes:
A. required street trees are located within the right-of-way, no more than 25 feet
apart;
B. landscaping will effectively screen the parking lot with a balance of low lying
and vertical shrubbery;
C. landscaping within the vision clearance triangle will not grow more than three
(3) feet in height in the vision clearance triangle. Please note: In the case that
the vision clearance standards conflicts with the parking lot screening
standards, the vision clearance standards supersede; and
D. landscaping will meet buffering and screening standards for the required buffer
area to the north and south.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 3 OF 16
14. Submit a revised ,i to include the location of one (1, 3ycle parking space. This
may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces
currently required.
15. Revise the site plan to provide for a handicap accessible space of nine (9) feet wide
with an eight (8)-foot access aisle.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
16. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plans.
17. Complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the
City and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements.
18. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1)
mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise
"DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-
drawn, then a diskette is not required.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site History:
Prior to the property changing ownership, the site was used as a guitar shop. Use of the
property for a commercial business was not approved in accordance with the Tigard
Development Code and was, therefore, not a legal commercial use. A search of City
records indicates that there are no previous land use approvals granted for the site.
Vicinity Information:
The subject property is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue between SW Baylor
and SW Atlanta Streets. The site is identified as 11570 SW 69th Avenue, WCTM
1S136DD, Tax Lot 01100. Properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Mixed
Use Employment (MUE). The properties to the north and south are currently developed with
single-family residential homes. The properties to the east and west are currently vacant.
The site is within the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply.
Site Information and Proposal Description:
The site is currently developed with a single-family residence. The proposal is to convert the
existing structure to an office, pave the parking areas and install landscaping.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 4 OF 16
SECTION IV. APP, .;ABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AN. ANDINGS
Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of
the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an
application:"
Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact
study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of
real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a
requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports
that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts
of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval
requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval
authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real
property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed
development will have on the public.
The applicant has not submitted an impact study that specifically quantified the impacts of
this development on public facilities and systems. No right-of-way or easement
dedications are required as part of this proposal. In accordance with Section
18.164.030.A and J, the applicant is required to pay for and construct their portion of the
local street fronting the property. In order for the local street system to function to serve all
properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. The
required improvements provide for the share of local street improvements needed to serve
this development in conjunction with the standard improvements that are required of all
other properties. In other words, the applicant is only paying for their portion or segment
of the local street system. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services
that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. There is approximately
$3,485 of additional impact on the Collector and Arterial street system that is not being
recuperated through fees and/or improvements.
PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS OF UNDERLYING ZONE
The MUE zone states that dimensional requirements for all commercial use types
shall be the same as the C-G district (Section 18.62.050). Section 18.62.050 states
that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet.
Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping.
The proposal provides for more than 15% landscaping, thus meeting the underlying zones
landscaping regulations. Please note: Additional landscaping standards apply which may
increase the amount of landscaping currently proposed.
The MUE zone states that the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for all commercial and
industrial use types shall not exceed 0.40.
The existing structure does not exceed 40% of the site, therefore the FAR has been met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 5 OF 16
Setbacks: Section 1. _.050 states that no front, sid, .)r rear yard setback is
required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback is required where the zone abuts
a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet
This section is not applicable as the structure is existing and setbacks will not be altered as a
result of this proposal. Setbacks related to landscaping requirements are discussed further
elsewhere within this decision.
FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the
setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, the provisions and
regulations of the underlying zone have been met.
TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS
Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and
renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design
standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard
Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a
convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing
streetscape to create a high quality image for the area.
All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in
non single family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and
quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below
and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes,
developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to
public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in
funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the
Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard
in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern.
BECAUSE THE PROPOSAL INVOLVES AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, THE FOLLOWING
DESIGN STANDARDS DO NOT APPLY:
A. Site Design Standards including: building placement, building setback, front yard
setback design and walkway connection to building entrances; and
B. Building Design Standards including: ground floor windows, building facades,
weather protection, building materials, roofs and roof-lines, and roof-mounted
equipment.
THE FOLLOWING DESIGN STANDARDS ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT:
Street Connectivity:
All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will
be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of
Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or
environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street
extensions and connections.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 6 OF 16
Design Option:
A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no
more than 660 feet.
B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be
provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet.
Performance Option:
A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street
intersections per mile.
B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector
or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance.
C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a
collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line
distance.
The site meets the Design Option. Based on the information provided with the
Application, the distances between SW 68th Street and SW 69th Street, and between SW
Atlanta and SW Baylor Streets; Staff finds that both meet the 660-foot local street spacing
requirement and the 330-foot pedestrian/bicycle pathway connectivity standards.
FINDING: Because the site meets the Design Option for both the north/south and
east/west connections, the street connectivity standards have, therefore,
been satisfied.
Site Design Standards; Parking Location and Landscape Design:
Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be
located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side,
parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a
landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth
of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever
is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape
Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be
landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard.
The proposal is to convert from a residence to a commercial business. There are no
"newly constructed" structures proposed for this lot, therefore, the parking lot location
standard can not be applied. However, the landscaping standard still applies between the
parking lot and the street. The applicant has indicated that an eight (8)-foot-wide
landscape strip will be installed along the entire frontage. The landscape standards are
discussed, and conditioned if necessary, elsewhere within this decision.
FINDING: Because the parking lot location standard can not be applied and because
the landscaping requirements will be addressed, and conditioned if
necessary, elsewhere within this decision, this standard can been satisfied.
Signs:
In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the
following standards shall be met:
Zoning District Regulations: non-residential development within the MUE zone shall
meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D).
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 7 OF 16
Sign Area Limits:
The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area
limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle.
Height Limits:
The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs
shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No
height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle.
Sign Location:
Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required
L-1 landscape areas.
The applicant has not indicated signs are proposed. If a sign is requested, it must be
approved through the sign permit process as administered by the City of Tigard
Development Services Technicians. Compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at
that time. A sign permit must be obtained for ANY sign located on the property.
FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required if and when a sign
permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied.
Landscaping And Screening:
Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard
Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the
depth of the landscaping or screening are define in other sub-sections of this
section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be
substituted as long as all height limitations are met.
L-1 (Low Screen):
For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots,
local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping
and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and
minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot
and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3 1/2 inch caliper, at a
maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot
high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully
cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Any tree planted in excess
of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit.
L-2 (General Landscaping):
For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots,
local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping
and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2 1/2 inch caliper,
at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve
the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in
excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit.
Because the site is on a local street, the L-1 and L-2 landscape standards defer to the
planting standards of Section 18.100. These standards are discussed further in this
decision.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 8 OF 16
FINDING: Because the ^ndscape standards of 18.100 are i_.iuired in-lieu-of the L-1 or
L-2 landscape standards, and because the landscape standards of 18.100
are discussed, and conditioned if necessary, further in this decision, the
landscaping and screening standards of the Tigard Triangle have been
satisfied.
PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS
Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be
consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The
applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,
18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164, MUE Standards and Tigard Triangle Design Standards.
The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following
sections.
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80
(Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94
(Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which
are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be
inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision.
Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120):
Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section
18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land
uses.
The site is surrounded by MUE to the north, south, east and west. There are existing
residences to the north and south and vacant lots to the east and west (across 69th). The
applicant has indicated there are no residential uses, however none of the immediate
surrounding properties have received approvals to change from a residence to a commercial
business, therefore they are considered residential land uses. In addition, staff did not
observe any commercial activity during a site visit on November 5, 1997. This area is zoned
MUE which will continue to allow residences. The buffering and screening requirement is to
screen from different types of uses. Because the north and south properties are currently
residential use types, the change of the site in question from residential to commercial
requires buffering and screening between the adjacent uses. The applicant has not
proposed any buffering or screening. Based on the location of the existing house, the 20-
foot required buffers are not possible, therefore, additional screening is needed to
compensate for the reduced buffer width. The following landscaping is required for buffers
as per Section 18.100.080:
1. at least one (1) row of trees, no less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous or five (5)
feet for evergreen at time of planting;
2. at least ten (10), five (5)-gallon shrubs or 20, one (1)-gallon shrubs per 1000 square
feet of required buffer area; and
3. the remaining area must be planted in lawn, groundcover, or bark mulch.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 9 OF 16
In addition, one (1) of if )flowing screening methods is req d: A hedge of narrow or
broad leaf evergreen shrubs which forms a four (4)-foot high continuous shrub within two (2)
years; an earthen berm planted with evergreen materials which forms a continuous screen
six (6) feet in height within two (2) years; or a five (5)-foot or taller fence or wall to provide a
continuous sight obscuring screen.
FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed landscaping within the required buffer
area between the site and the residences to the north and south, the
standards have not been met. If the applicant submits a landscape plan with
the required landscaping as described above, the Buffering and Screening
standards will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan, prepared by a landscape architect, that
shows the required buffering and screening within the buffer area along the
north and south property line.
Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas.
Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively
screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should
achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees
shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally
distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to
provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be
three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by
some form of wheel guard or curb.
The applicant has proposed Moogo Pines, less than 1" in caliper and azaleas, will be
planted alternately six (6) feet apart. Based on the distance proposed between plantings,
the landscaping will not effectively screen the parking lot as required. Staff can not confirm
without a statement from a landscape architect whether the proposed plants, at a higher
density, would create a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery.
FINDING: Because the proposed landscaping will not effectively screen the parking lot
with a balance of low lying and vertical shrubbery, this criterion has not been
satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan and confirmation by a
landscape architect that it will screen as required, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan that indicates landscaping will effectively screen the
parking lot with a balance of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The landscape
plan must be accompanied by verification from a landscape architect that the
plan meets the above outlined standards.
Street Trees:
Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street
shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section
18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart
depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large).
Tigard Triangle Design Standards (which supersedes all other code provisions) call for
spreading street trees spreading to 25 feet along local streets. The applicant has not
indicated that any street trees will be planted.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 10 OF 16
•
FINDING: Because thy. ,pplicant has not proposed street ti.,ds, and because they are
required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and applicable code
sections, the street tree standards have not been met. If the applicant
complies with the conditions specified below, the standards will be satisfied.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan that shows the required street trees are located
within the right-of-way, no more than 25 feet apart.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.102):
Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of
all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street
and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting,
fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet
in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed
within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual
clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along
the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot
distance points with a straight line.
There appears to be landscaping proposed in the vision clearance triangle. Because the
landscaping plan must be revised, staff can not determine if the proposed landscaping will
meet the vision clearance requirements. There are no structures, other than an existing
utility pole proposed within the vision clearance triangle.
FINDING: Because the landscaping plan is being revised, staff can not determine if
landscaping within the vision clearance triangle will meet the standards. If the
landscape architect verifies that the landscaping within the vision clearance
triangle is not over three (3) feet in height, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan indicating landscaping in the vision clearance triangle
will not grow more than three (3) feet in height. Please note: In the case that
the vision clearance standards conflict with the parking lot screening
standards, the vision clearance standards supersede.
Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) - Minimum off-street parking:
The code requires one (1) parking space per employee during the largest shift for the type of
use proposed. The applicant has indicated that there will be a total of four (4) employees
(including himself). The site plan shows four (4) parking spaces, therefore, the standard has
been met. Please be aware, that if additional employees are hired, all vehicles must be
parked on a paved surface.
Bicycle Parking:
Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15
required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall
not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways.
Because the site has between 1 and 15 parking spaces, one (1) bicycle parking space is
required. The applicant has not indicated that a bicycle space will be installed.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 11 OF 16
FINDING: Because c (1) bicycle parking space is req d and the plan does not
indicate that bicycle parking has been provided for, this standard has not been
met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that includes the provision of one
(1) bicycle parking space, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space.
Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108):
Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99
parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a
minimum pavement width of 24 feet.
There are less that 99 parking spaces proposed. Therefore, one (1) 30-foot-wide access is
required. The applicant has indicated on the plans that a 30-foot-wide access will be
installed.
FINDING: Because the proposed access meets the requirements, this standard has
been met.
Signs (18.114 ):
Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the
C-G Zone.
This provision is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which were discussed
previously in this decision.
FINDING: Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards relating to signs take
precedence, this standard does not apply.
Tree Removal (18.150)
Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review
application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees,
identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12
inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining
standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and
after construction.
There are several trees over 12-inch in caliper on the site. The applicant has indicated that
no trees will be removed. Based on the location of the trees on the site, and the proposed
and required improvements, staff agrees with the applicant's assessment that no trees must
be removed.
FINDING: Because no trees over 12-inch caliper will be removed as a result of this
proposal, this criterion has been met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 12 OF 16
Street And Utility Improv_ .gent Standards (18.1642:
Streets:
This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue which is classified as a local commercial and
industrial street according to the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS). The required
right-of-way (ROW) width for this type of street is 60 feet. At present, there is 30 feet of
ROW from centerline which is adequate to meet the standard.
The street is partially paved but is not constructed to meet the minimum public standard
for a local commercial industrial street. The City Council's adoption of the TTDS requires
improvement of local streets when properties in the Triangle are developed or
redeveloped. The applicant, therefore, should be required to construct a half-street
improvements in SW 69th Avenue adjacent to this site as a part of the development in
order to mitigate the additional traffic impact.
Water:
This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. There is an
existing public water line within the ROW of SW 69th Avenue. The existing structure is
presently connected to the public water line. Any additional connections proposed for the
development shall be reviewed and permitted by the TVWD.
Sanitary Sewer:
There are no existing public sanitary sewer lines near this site available for service. The
closest public sewer line is approximately 1,200 feet to the south. Many other properties
within the Triangle are not served by the public sewer system and the City Council recently
adopted a policy that will help provide for the future extension of public sewer lines
throughout the Triangle area. The Council decided that where sites are over 300 feet
away from a public sewer line, and where the existing septic system for the site is currently
functioning adequately, the particular developer should be required to pay a fee to the City
that would be a fair-share portion of the future extension of a public sewer line to serve the
particular site. The City Engineer would need to estimate the value of the future sewer
extension and determine the fair-share fee that would be paid. For this site, since the
public sewer line is well over 300 feet away, Staff recommends that the applicant pay a
fair-share fee. An estimate of a future sewer line extension has not yet been calculated,
but would need to be both calculated and paid prior to the issuance of any building permits
for this project.
Storm Drainage:
The topography of this site falls to the west. The applicant's plan indicates that an on-site
storm drainage line will be installed along the east side of the building and will be routed to
SW 69th Avenue. This private storm line will need to be connected into the public storm
system that will be installed with the half-street improvements. The public storm drainage
system will need to be sized to accommodate the full development of the surrounding
drainage basin. In accordance with the requirements of USA's Design and Construction
Standards, the applicant's design engineer will also need to perform a downstream
analysis to determine if there will be adverse impacts to the downstream storm drainage
system because of additional storm water runoff from this parcel. If downstream impacts
are expected, the applicant will either need to make improvements to the downstream
system or provide on-site detention facility.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 13 OF 16
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards
(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which requires the construction of on-site
water quality facilities. However, the Design and Construction Standards also contain a
provision that recognizes that certain sites are unsuitable for on-site facilities because of
trouble with topography or size. This site is fairly limited in space due to the existing
building and parking needs. There does not appear to be adequate space available to
locate an on-site facility. Therefore, in accordance with the USA Standards, Staff
recommends the applicant pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility.
The fee is based on the area of new impervious surfaces and will need to be calculated by
the City's Engineering Department and paid by the Applicant prior to issuance of the site
and/or building permit.
Grading and Erosion Control:
USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the
amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any
other activity which accelerates erosion. USA regulations require that the applicant submit
an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to the issuance of City permits.
Existing Overhead Utility Lines:
There are existing overhead utility lines on SW 69th Avenue. Section 18.164.120 of the
Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development
to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of
undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal
foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan, as submitted, does not meet the
Street and Utility Improvement standards. However, if the applicant revises
the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary
improvements in compliance with Conditions 1-12 and 18-20 outlined on
pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will
then be satisfied.
CONDITION:The applicant must comply with Conditions 1-12 and 18-20 as outlined on
pages 2-4 of this decision.
ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS
Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides additional Site
Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of
the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately
below with the following exceptions:
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are,
therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards:
18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations);
18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise);
18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use);
18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use);
18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); and
18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces).
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 14 OF 16
The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be
addressed in this section:
18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation);
18.120.180.13(Parking);
18.120.180.14(Landscaping);
18.120.180.15(Drainage); and
18.120.180.17(Signs).
Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment:
Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees,
topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or
greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character.
The proposal is simply to change the use of an existing structure. No buildings will be added
or expanded, therefore, this standard is not applicable.
FINDING: Because the proposal does not involve the location of a new structure, this
standard does not apply.
Crime Prevention and Safety:
Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles
shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas
having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
The parking lot is for employee parking only. The site is not in a high pedestrian or vehicular
traffic area. A large customer base (if any) is not anticipated by staff, therefore, the need for
crime prevention lighting is not a requirement on this site. The applicant has not proposed
any lighting, however if any is installed, the applicant is encouraged to implement crime
prevention techniques.
FINDING: Because crime prevention lighting is not proposed or required, the criterion
regulating installation does not apply.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall
be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces
as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person
parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these
standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces
are provided.
This proposal indicates that one (1) handicap parking space will be provided. The ADA
requirements for handicap accessible parking requires that at least one (1) of the parking
spaces be van accessible. The space proposed does not meet the van accessible
requirements of a nine (9)-foot space with an eight (8)-foot aisle.
FINDING: Because the plan does not provide for a handicap accessible space that
meets the required dimensions, this standard has not been met. If the
applicant submits a revised plan that shows the handicap parking space will be
9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle, this standard will be met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 15 OF 16
CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that provides for a hanuicap accessible space of 9
feet wide with an 8-foot access aisle.
SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered
comments regarding possible requirements involved in changing the occupancy of the
buildings. These comments were forwarded to the applicant who was encouraged to meet
with a plans examiner to discuss the requirements.
The City of Tigard Property Manager, Tigard Development Technicians, Tualatin
Valley Water District, GTE, PGE, and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal
and offered no comments or objections.
SECTION VI. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY DECEMBER 1, 1997
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections
18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides
that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below.
The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development
Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 1, 1997.
Questions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community
Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at
(503) 639-4171.
.�.e.�//44-kg- November 20, 1997
PREPAR BY: Julia Powell duk DATE
r <-75) Associate Pla er
APP i _ t,v eh.,,,,_ - November 20, 1997
VED BY: Richard wersdorff DATE
Planning anager i:\curpin\ulia\sdr97-12.doc
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 16 OF 16
-It -. a
L, u i - - _ - - - ` - - - -- + SW69TH AVENUE 4 - - - - - - - - - - -
r
U
LyvJ,9 S.I -- ;" 'O . O.'T�...o;9�.. "o�':'.' _' I 1
' I 1 .. ... �.. �_ I :a
I I �3L-
_ 1 I im
ONI?[2Idd 1 1
en
I T
3 1 s- �n d 1 S fir M.iero'1 �
201 CU
a 1 nhmv.a ouln,ma» I MN
IV
1. \\,,,,,,..- / 'I , (_;.1. 1 1 ._i
Z
IL__ __"*44 --jr-101 -14— CA
rn
.4 I 1 : 11
40 1: I 11 n'+•
C) ' I I
I ,.I o
.= en D I !— 1 I I
CD 0 �� 1 11
:A 1
CD O R1 �Ole. �\ 1 1
cfp ii,V •Z 1 sJ - - - ` - - rw�a 14)141•C - - - I'
r
p
1
= 1 - — :o--;to .1,
O .
1 f
1
f
- — — — - - - - - + SW 68TH AVENUE 4- -- -- - - - — -
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION A
.r. i
\ \ '
I a)
E
-t
a,
0_
a)
0
co
_ r-- c
TLAN`A ST ■r-Fi t i I 1 • c
1 MUFF'
ST a
BP�YLOR �_
'-c---------- A - -_____
Q cu
ti
G WZON - ST 45 I 11- if ii
_ ....,
I cooll >%
Nob U
DARTMOUTH ST illik
I I I
Vicinity all N SOB 91-0012
I __ A_ Rhee Dental Office i
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: November 17, 1997
TO: Julia Hajduk, Planning Division
FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer T7V''
RE: SDR 97-0012, Rhee Dental Office
Description:
This proposal is to allow the conversion of a single-family dwelling to a dental
office. The site is located at 11570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 1S1 36DD, Tax Lot
1100). The site is north of SW Baylor Street and south of SW Atlanta Street,
which is within the Tigard Triangle and is subject to the Tigard Triangle Design
Standards adopted by the City Council.
Findings:
1 . Streets:
This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue which is classified as a local
commercial and industrial street according to the Tigard Triangle Design
Standards (TTDS). The required right-of-way (ROW) width for this type of
street is 60 feet. At present, there is 30 feet of ROW from centerline
which is adequate to meet the standard.
The street is partially paved but is not constructed to meet the minimum
public standard for a local commercial industrial street. The City Council's
adoption of the TTDS requires improvement of local streets when
properties in the Triangle are developed or redeveloped. The applicant,
therefore, should be required to construct a half-street improvement in SW
69th Avenue adjacent to this site as a part of the development in order to
mitigate the additional traffic impact.
2. Water:
This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service
area. There is an existing public water line within the ROW of SW 69th
Avenue. The existing structure is presently connected to the public water
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 1
line. Any additional connections proposed for the development shall be
reviewed and permitted by TVWD.
3. Sanitary Sewer:
There are no existing public sanitary sewer lines near this site available
for service. The closest public sewer line is approximately 1,200 feet to
the south. Many other properties within the Triangle are not served by the
public sewer system and the City Council recently adopted a policy that
will help provide for the future extension of public sewer lines throughout
the Triangle area. The Council decided that where sites are over 300 feet
away from a public sewer line, and where the existing septic system for
the site is currently functioning adequately, the particular developer should
be required to pay a fee to the City that would be a fair-share portion of
the future extension of a public sewer line to serve the particular site. The
City Engineer would need to estimate the value of the future sewer
extension and determine the fair-share fee that would be paid. For this
site, since the public sewer line is well over 300 feet away, Staff
recommends that the applicant pay a fair-share fee. An estimate of a
future sewer line extension has not yet been calculated, but would need to
be calculated prior to issuance of a building permit for the building
improvements. The fee itself would also need to be paid by the applicant
prior to issuance of the building permit.
4. Storm Drainage:
The topography of this site falls to the west. The applicant's plan
indicates that an on-site storm drainage line will be installed along the
east side of the building and will be routed to SW 69th Avenue. This
private storm line will need to be connected into the public storm system
that will be installed with the half-street improvements. The public storm
drainage system will need to be sized to accommodate the full
development of the surrounding drainage basin. In accordance with the
requirements of USA's Design and Construction Standards, the
applicant's design engineer will also need to perform a downstream
analysis to determine if there will be adverse impacts to the downstream
storm drainage system because of additional storm water runoff from this
parcel. If downstream impacts are expected, the applicant will either need
to make improvements to the downstream system or provide on-site
detention.
5. Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 2
and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44)
which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. However,
the Design and Construction Standards also contain a provision that
recognizes that certain sites are unsuitable for on-site facilities because of
trouble with topography or size. This site is fairly limited in space due to
the existing building and parking needs. There does not appear to be
adequate space available to locate an on-site facility. Therefore, in
accordance with the USA Standards, Staff recommends the applicant pay
a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is
based on the area of new impervious surfaces and will need to be
calculated by the City and paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the
site and/or building permit.
6. Grading and Erosion Control:
USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to
reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public
storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction,
grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an
erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City
permits.
7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines:
There are existing overhead utility lines on SW 69th Avenue. Section
18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a
development to be placed underground or, at the election of the
developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is
proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that
contains the overhead lines.
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT:
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will
be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171).
1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a public improvement
permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets
of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 3
be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once
redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design
engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1)
itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE:
these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division
and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public
improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement
Design Standards, which are available at City Hall.
2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering
Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone
number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for
executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance
for the public improvements.
3. The applicant shall construct standard half-street improvements along the
frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall
include:
a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18
feet (Tigard Triangle Standards)
b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the
existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage
c. curb or curb and gutter
d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to
convey subsurface runoff
e. 5 foot concrete sidewalk
f. street striping
g. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer
h. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a
fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities)
street signs (if applicable)
j. driveway apron (if applicable)
k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW
69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering
Department.
4. A profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either
side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future
grade.
5. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District
for any proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public
improvement permit.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 4
•
6. If the applicant/property owner can demonstrate that the existing on-site
sanitary sewer septic system is functioning adequately to serve the new
use, the City will allow the continued use of the system provided the
applicant/property owner pays a fee in-lieu of constructing off-site sanitary
sewer improvements for the site. The fee will be based on an engineer's
estimate of the cost to extend public sanitary sewer to the area surrounding
the site. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of the site and/or building
permit.
7. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant's design
engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City (Brian Rager),
of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the
proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of
the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the
drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10
percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less
than 1/4 mile.
8. If the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or
culvert is surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to
the development, the developer shall correct the capacity problem or
construct an on-site detention facility.
9. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave a proposed
development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing
buildings or dwellings, the downstream stormwater system shall be
enlarged to relieve the identified flooding condition prior to development or
the developer must construct an on-site detention facility.
10. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-
lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the
total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. The
applicant will need to provide area calculations to the Engineering
Department so the fee can be calculated. The fee is equal to $ 180.00 for
every 2,640 square feet of new impervious area.
11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement
drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994.
12. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW
69th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee
in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the
site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the
fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to final building inspection.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 5
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL
BUILDING INSPECTION:
13. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required
public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and
provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements.
14. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with
as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a
diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will
be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-
drawn, then a diskette is not required.
is\eng\brianr\comments\sdr97-12.bdr
ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0012 Rhee Dental Office PAGE 6
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS O TIi;ARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
DATE: October 20,1991
(71e° IMP
TO: Development Services Technicians mm■ Jill: lean: Jim: ' . .4
IMI Bonnier `
Debbie:
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haidu*,Associate Planner
Phone:15031 63941171 Fax:(5031 684-7297
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRJ 91-0012
)=- RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement, Plans, and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
—
Written comments provided below:
14
(Please provide the following information)Name of Permits)Commenting:
[Phone Numberts): I
SDR 9012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
CITY TIiGARD
Community'Development
RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping A Better Community
DATE: October 20,1991
OCT 2 7 1997
TO: Pete Nelson,US West Communications CITYOFTIGARD
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner
Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-1291
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)91-0012
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement, Plans,and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
yC Written comments provided below:
Eszsr,
i� L g . /0 _ ' / A 1 r Gtr 1/ .7-
4
(Please provide the following information)Name of Personlsl Commenting:
- iry G E N
'Phone Number's]: N-z cc
SgD 97-0012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping A Better Community
DATE: October 20,1997
TO: Brian Moore,PGE
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner
Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-1297
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]91-0012
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square I
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement, Plans,and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. if you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
.4r We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
riAX
(Please provide the following information)Name of Personfsl Commenting:
I Phone Numberfsl: 4c10,0
SDR 974012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
nC
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIOARD
Community Development
Shaping Better Community
DATE: October 20,1991
TO: David Scott,Building Official
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner
Phone:1503)639-4171 Fax:15031684-7291
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)91-0012
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement, Plans, and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below: l I'
1 L�.reN3,°J` �, N - � \a\ o Pe , Cm'�1\
0
J k 6CA r Yetn d /_ aY)e,r" ,-1-vy41
pail:PS() ,ec,(ko( Ca. \?\A\&.\ \Q IAArAO,
-\a r A`i\ \ .)1\ N a\\ \\ c \A (AArr`4 i (4p, S arne egref 4-1
QC) Ct , ige0WW^ Yr 11‘ - � It (kP S /`P �U o• 1)vEIl
p1 Ct K
(Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: V S� �l vv��, L 1 41.4
Ai lo sta g [1 4
I Phone Numberfsl:
SDR 97-0012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
44,
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
CITY TIIGARD
Community Development
Shaping Better Community
DATE: October 20,1991
TO: Michael Miller,Operations Water Department Manager
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner
Phone:1503)639-4171 Fax:1503)684-7297
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 91-0012
➢
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement, Plans, and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. q E
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
41
(Please provide the following information)Name of Person's/Commenting:
Phone Number's]:
SDR 97-0012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
October 22, 1997 CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Mr. Paul Rhee
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
RE: SDR 97-0012
Mr. Rhee:
As part of the review process for your Site Development Review, we forwarded a copy
of your proposal to agencies and city departments that may have comments, concerns
or objections to a development proposal. The Building Division has provided us with
comments that we wanted to make you aware of. The Building Official indicates that
the conversion of a dwelling to a dental office constitutes a change of use and
occupancy which requires the building be made to comply with all provisions of the
current building code. While this requirement will not delay our review of your site
development proposal, we want to make you aware that there may be additional
requirements to bring the structure up to code. You must address any necessary
improvements prior to taking occupancy of the building so, the sooner you make any
necessary improvements, the better. The Building Official suggests you schedule a
meeting with the plans examiner to discuss possible improvements necessary to bring
the building up to code. You can contact Bob Poskin (639-4171 x 392) to schedule this
meeting.
As I previously stated, the planning review is still in process, however, you will need to
have any building issues resolved prior to occupancy. Please contact Bob Poskin
directly concerning any building improvement or requirement questions.
Sincerely,
.1.41/
Julia Powell Hajduk
Associate Planner
is\curpin\julia\SDR\Rheelet2.doc
c: SDR 97-0012 land use file
Bob Poskin, Commercial Plans Examiner
Henry Lee, Century 21 Columbia Realty, 9020 SW Wa. Sq. Dr., Tigard, OR
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
ericrS 18ti-/Ce - /6.3 Ab by
/O&)
9i-
4' '2r
reF ..32X G �✓- 7 yp9�S Ci,�JSYJi/1s4L4
TSF is-/c4"4.- r y UI h+�
.../i�� 9`fi�1Ct
i - 35'8'5
_
It AI 4A ,43..-�_ ikc,c, v
\""5
ski
, E.—i .
L
MOs- .
?
n� ,.. S -a S 'a
6a4,14 es ACC108107 (u4 5 { •
zs
V �r �` k
. - -- kur ;:f -)
_ -
___________i ,I, Loif—_ _____
,, i V9
I I 1 a
._
- a ....„-
, / 7 / f / 1 , .
. cgiL------
____________„_;_________________77--- ....
1
*.,met)0 . ,. .;
. .... f
: i
! x.'53 . ;, �` ..,
-- ? .. -
6-53 -574?3
v
.
■.rt
'1•i I
>1
elO I lA
c 4j e
or 1%1 SGT
\\ 1:,_j y . ,tobu to,
4,-
7,... ,„,,,, .) 5 ?)
__________
, c _____,_, , ,44„,-/,,,/
, c____7--_-_-_-,. C ‘...... -
I''/4_4'j � �
I4n� ro 5��5CI �: s V'
� f 64, 1 9 rec
q�Na 04- v 3�� Ark'441
Si
IQ�5--r
--
1)-,....,".. - rte
Zor----) 1 j-/r `e .
1-------------
es. - �
s
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
CITY OF TIIGARD
Community Development
Shaping Better Community
DATE: October 20,1991
TO: PER ATTACHED
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner
Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031 684-7297
RE:
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)91-0012
> RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
The Applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax
Lot 01100. The site is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of
Atlanta Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real
Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation, Professional and
Administrative Services, General Retail Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished
Products, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Chapters 18.
Attached are copies of the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement, Plans, and/or additional items provided by the
applicant for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information
available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in
the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday -
October 30,1991. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are
unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your
comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
V �
(Please provide the following information)Name of Persontsl Commenting:
I Phone Number[sl: I
SDR 97-0012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
NOTIFICATION UST FIN UM ISE s DEYELOPMEIR A?PUCmONS
j CIT Arz (CI (II (s) (WI Cf 1ZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS IQ Mica tar ruIew a Litnry PT lsak[s1 1
FILE IIO[S.: 97--/z---/Z FILE MAMEIS]: ' ce n2-4,1 Or/ c.
1 CITY 9FRCES
ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,a.M.4s.......,XCOMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJD..,...s.4 - POLICE DEPTJc....P.......o,.,..
'k BUILDING DIV/David Scott.r......0.... ZENGINEERING DEPT.,Bnan Rager, ....€„,._r )WATER DEPT/Michael Miller,o....r......y.
CITY ADMINISTRAT1OWCathy Wheatley,c.,....,.. _OPERATIONS DEPT/John Roy,......,......o., OTHER
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
_TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE \_TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia HuffmarvSWM Program
Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street
(place In pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro.OR 97124
LOCAL AND STATE IDRtSDICTIONS
CITY OF BEAVERTON _CITY OF TUALATIN _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS
PO Box 4755 Planning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE
Beaverton-OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem.OR 97310-1337
Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207
_Larry Conrad. s..orvr.« OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM.
_Mike Matteuca.v.q,orm coa.a METRO OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE
600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street.Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380
_CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232
City Manager _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG.
PO Box 23483 _Paulette Allen,G.c04/1.4..0.n..,c,,,..,.,, _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue
Dumam,OR 97281-3483 _Mei Huie,Green,o.c.a Co..oa,ror(CPA's/MA 11 1175 Court Street.NE PO Box 2946
Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946
CITY OF KING CITY _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION
City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(000T) WASHINGTON COUNTY
15300 SW 116th Avenue Building S16.Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans.
King City,OR 972.24 Portland.OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland.PW.eq 155 N.First Avenue
3040 25th Street.SE Suite 350.MS 13
_CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124
Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration
PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 _ODOT,REGION 1 _Brent Curtis,cr*-s)
Lake Oswego.CR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen,o.e.a P.cave Scott King(CPA„
Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Mike Borreson(e ..n
_CITY OF PORTLAND Portland.OR 97209-4037 _Jim Tice(IGA,)
David Knowles,r. .ge,....or. _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Tom Harry mi....Pt Ars.,
Portland Budding 106.Rm. 1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 •DISTRICT 2A Phil Healy rc..,.n PL A„a,
1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,PI,..soma.
Portland.CR 97204 PO Box 25.412
Portland.CR 97298-0412
UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES
_BURLINGTON NORTHERN RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.(R/R) _TRJ-WET TRANSIT DVLPMT.
Administrative Cffice Jason Hewitt Clifford C.Cabe.Construction Engineer Michael Kiser. Proiect Planner
1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street
Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place.S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Portland.CR 97232
Beaverton,CR 97006-4886
_COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON SUS WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Craig Eyestone 'N NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Linda Peterson Pete Nelson
14200 SW Bngadoon Court Scott Palmer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street
Beaverton.CR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland.CR 97204
Portland.CR 97209-3991
.�GENERAL TELEPHONE
Paul Koft.Engineering `}PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
MC: OR030546 Bnan Moore
Tigard.OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road
Beaverton,OR 97007 ktoanyvnauersvicrouce rnst 2-May-37
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 R ip tc`eV ETD 8 9 7 5
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising NOV 2 6 1997
• City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY Cw 77sr,,2D
13125 SW Hal]. Blvd .
• Tiga rd,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR)97-0012
>RHEE DENTAL OFFICE<
• Accounts Payable • The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site
Development Review approval to convert an approximately 3,472 square
foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office. LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th
Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD,Tax Lot 01100.The site is located on the east
side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of Atlanta
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Street. ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE.The MUE zone allows
Single-Family Attached Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential
STATE OF OREGON, Units, Children's Day Care, Financial, Insurance and Real Estate Ser-
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )SS. vices, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant Sports and Recreation,
Professional and Administrative Services,General Retail Sales,Transient
I, Kathy Snyder Lodging,and Manufacturing of Finished Products,among other uses.AP-
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising PLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Director, or his principal clerk, of the Tigard-Tualatin Times Chapters 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.164; the Tigard Triangle
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Design Standards and the Mixed Use Employment (MUE)Zoning Stan-
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the dards.
aforesaid county and state; that the
SDP. Fhee Dental Office_ _
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and
consecutive in the following issues: ``
November 20 , 1997 )
. . -IA 8T
KcLtIJ LA.- l ��__ __ eT !o -
Subscribed and sworn to . re me this ' I • • • mbe „ ,�1
S _ _ /I 4 =
Not•fy Public for Oregon �_N --
My Commission Expires: MY COW
ST
AFFIDAVIT !
......,...UTM 6T aiirlA
I I r -, , r —
The adopted finding of facts,decision, and statement of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W.
Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on Decem-
ber 1, 1997. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in a ccor-
dance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Com-
munity Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be
filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing
an appeal is 3:30 P.M., December 1, 1997.
TT8975-Publish November 20, 1997.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Crn o Al li,
n' a. RD
Commuruty,DeveCopment
Sfutptny,i,&tter-Communuy
STATE OAF OREGON )
-
County of'Washington )ss.
City of Tigard )
I, PaMCia L Wnsfard, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for
the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon.
That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED G) PUBLIC NEARING FOIL
N.Imi O m II aseasOst IOM mils Woo OM
(daft asermiate Ma ww)
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
❑ Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
_,,� ❑ Tigard City Council
That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED DECISION Fat
tOw IN Amt for.►
0 City of Tigard Planning Director
0 That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED CI) FINAL ORDER FOB:
Mod Ow am.'riglaiiM
{chat as ss1at.Mg Wow)
❑ City of Tigard Planning Director
❑ Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
:I. That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOB:
A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached,
marked Exhibit "A", was hailed to a-//Win named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked
Dtaihit"B" n the D ,■ day of 1e& 1997, and deposited in the United States Mail on the
�-0 day of 'it J.; yyr !TJ7 91 postage prepaid.
Jte-6--1, W4.3-:.'( C- - 7. ,/,,6
[person that Prepa , . 1 cal
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �"7 day of i-4'41';190.
S OFFICIAL SEAL Ii /DIAN NOTARY PUBLIC•faREGON
COMMISSION NO 046142
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 N ART PUBLIC OF 08 •�I /Ft
My Commission F ires: ( �
L AIL!INFi_ a -
XH1BI'A
NOTICE OF DECISION
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 91-0012 CITY OF IGARD
Community Development
RHEE DENTAL OFFICE Shaping A Better Community
120 DAYS = 2/11/97
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASE NO(S).: FILE NAME: RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
Site Development Review (SDR) 97-0012
PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to
convert an existing dwelling unit into an office for a dental laboratory.
APPLICANT: Paul Rhee OWNER: Same
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment; MUE.
ZONING
DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment; MUE.
LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 01100. The site is
located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue between SW Atlanta and
SW Baylor Streets.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164; Tigard Triangle Design Standards;
and the MUE Zoning Standards.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee
has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval.
The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 1 OF 16
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
(Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager,
Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.)
1 . A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project.
Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings
shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once
redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall
then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost
estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to
public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard
Public Improvement Design Standards which are available at City Hall.
2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall
be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or
corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and
providing the financial assurance for the public improvements.
3. Construct standard half-street improvements along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue.
The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:
A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet
(Tigard Triangle Standards);
B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing
edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage;
C. curb or curb and gutter;
D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey
subsurface runoff;
E. five (5)-foot concrete sidewalk;
F. street striping;
G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer;
H. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu
of undergrounding existing overhead utilities);
street signs (if applicable);
J. driveway apron (if applicable); and
K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th
Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department.
4. Submit a profile of SW 69th Avenue extending 300 feet on either side of the subject
site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade.
5. Obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for any proposed water
connections prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit.
6. If the applicant/property owner can demonstrate that the existing on-site sanitary
sewer septic system is functioning adequately to serve the new use, the City will allow
the continued use of the system provided that the applicant/property owner pays a
fee in-lieu of constructing off-site sanitary sewer improvements for the site. The fee
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 2 OF 16
will be based on an engineer's estimate of the cost to exL..nd public sanitary sewer to
the area surrounding the site. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of the site
and/or building permits.
7. Submit documentation from a design engineer, for review by the City (Brian Hager),
of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed
development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system
downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the
proposed development site constitutes 10% or less of the total tributary drainage
volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile.
8. If the capacity of any downstream public storm conveyance system or culvert is
surpassed during the 25-year design storm event due directly to the development, the
developer shall correct the capacity problem or construct an on-site detention facility.
9. If the projected increase in surface water runoff which will leave the proposed
development will cause or contribute to damage from flooding to existing buildings or
dwellings, the downstream storm water system must be enlarged to relieve the
identified flooding condition prior to development or the developer must construct an
on-site detention facility.
10. Pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based
on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development. The
applicant will need to provide area calculations to the Engineering Department in
order to calculate the fee. The fee is equal to $180.00 for every 2,640 square feet of
new impervious area.
11 . Provide an erosion control plan as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan
shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical
Guidance Handbook, February 1994."
12. Either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 69th Avenue underground as
a part of this project, or pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be
calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be
$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to a final
building inspection.
13. Submit a landscape plan prepared by a landscape architect that includes:
A. required street trees are located within the right-of-way, no more than 25 feet
apart;
B. landscaping will effectively screen the parking lot with a balance of low lying
and vertical shrubbery;
C. landscaping within the vision clearance triangle will not grow more than three
(3) feet in height in the vision clearance triangle. Please note: In the case that
the vision clearance standards conflicts with the parking lot screening
standards, the vision clearance standards supersede; and
D. landscaping will meet buffering and screening standards for the required buffer
area to the north and south.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 3 OF 16
14. Submit a revised plan to include the location of one (1) uicycle parking space. This
may be located with other bicycle spaces, however, must be in addition to spaces
currently required.
15. Revise the site plan to provide for a handicap accessible space of nine (9) feet wide
with an eight (8)-foot access aisle.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
16. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plans.
17. Complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the
City and provide a one (1)-year maintenance assurance for said improvements.
18. Provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1)
mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise
"DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-
drawn, then a diskette is not required.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site History:
Prior to the property changing ownership, the site was used as a guitar shop. Use of the
property for a commercial business was not approved in accordance with the Tigard
Development Code and was, therefore, not a legal commercial use. A search of City
records indicates that there are no previous land use approvals granted for the site.
Vicinity Information:
The subject property is located on the east side of SW 69th Avenue between SW Baylor
and SW Atlanta Streets. The site is identified as 11570 SW 69th Avenue, WCTM
1S136DD, Tax Lot 01100. Properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Mixed
Use Employment (MUE). The properties to the north and south are currently developed with
single-family residential homes. The properties to the east and west are currently vacant.
The site is within the Tigard Triangle, therefore, the Tigard Triangle Design Standards apply.
Site Information and Proposal Description:
The site is currently developed with a single-family residence. The proposal is to convert the
existing structure to an office, pave the parking areas and install landscaping.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 4 OF 16
SECTION IV. API-LICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AN.. FINDINGS
Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of
the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an
application:"
Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact
study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For
each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose
improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the
development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private
property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of
real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a
requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports
that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts
of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval
requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval
authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real
property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed
development will have on the public.
The applicant has not submitted an impact study that specifically quantified the impacts of
this development on public facilities and systems. No right-of-way or easement
dedications are required as part of this proposal. In accordance with Section
18.164.030.A and J, the applicant is required to pay for and construct their portion of the
local street fronting the property. In order for the local street system to function to serve all
properties at buildout, streets meeting minimum standards must be provided. The
required improvements provide for the share of local street improvements needed to serve
this development in conjunction with the standard improvements that are required of all
other properties. In other words, the applicant is only paying for their portion or segment
of the local street system. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services
that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. There is approximately
$3,485 of additional impact on the Collector and Arterial street system that is not being
recuperated through fees and/or improvements.
PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS OF UNDERLYING ZONE
The MUE zone states that dimensional requirements for all commercial use types
shall be the same as the C-G district (Section 18.62.050). Section 18.62.050 states
that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet.
Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping.
The proposal provides for more than 15% landscaping, thus meeting the underlying zones
landscaping regulations. Please note: Additional landscaping standards apply which may
increase the amount of landscaping currently proposed.
The MUE zone states that the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for all commercial and
industrial use types shall not exceed 0.40.
The existing structure does not exceed 40% of the site, therefore the FAR has been met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 5 OF 16
Setbacks: Section 1 b.u2.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is
required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback is required where the zone abuts
a residential zoning district. The maximum building height is 45 feet
This section is not applicable as the structure is existing and setbacks will not be altered as a
result of this proposal. Setbacks related to landscaping requirements are discussed further
elsewhere within this decision.
FINDING: Because the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zone and meets the
setback and dimensional requirements for that zone, the provisions and
regulations of the underlying zone have been met.
TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS
Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and
renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design
standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard
Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a
convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing
streetscape to create a high quality image for the area.
All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in
non single family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and
quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below
and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes,
developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to
public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in
funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the
Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard
in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern.
BECAUSE THE PROPOSAL INVOLVES AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, THE FOLLOWING
DESIGN STANDARDS DO NOT APPLY:
A. Site Design Standards including: building placement, building setback, front yard
setback design and walkway connection to building entrances; and
B. Building Design Standards including: ground floor windows, building facades,
weather protection, building materials, roofs and roof-lines, and roof-mounted
equipment.
THE FOLLOWING DESIGN STANDARDS ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT:
Street Connectivity:
All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will
be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of
Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or
environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street
extensions and connections.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 6 OF 16
Design Option:
A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no
more than 660 feet.
B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be
provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet.
Performance Option:
A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street
intersections per mile.
B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector
or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance.
C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a
collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line
distance.
The site meets the Design Option. Based on the information provided with the
Application, the distances between SW 68th Street and SW 69th Street, and between SW
Atlanta and SW Baylor Streets; Staff finds that both meet the 660-foot local street spacing
requirement and the 330-foot pedestrian/bicycle pathway connectivity standards.
FINDING: Because the site meets the Design Option for both the north/south and
east/west connections, the street connectivity standards have, therefore,
been satisfied.
Site Design Standards; Parking Location and Landscape Design:
Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be
located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side,
parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a
landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth
of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever
is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape
Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be
landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard.
The proposal is to convert from a residence to a commercial business. There are no
"newly constructed" structures proposed for this lot, therefore, the parking lot location
standard can not be applied. However, the landscaping standard still applies between the
parking lot and the street. The applicant has indicated that an eight (8)-foot-wide
landscape strip will be installed along the entire frontage. The landscape standards are
discussed, and conditioned if necessary, elsewhere within this decision.
FINDING: Because the parking lot location standard can not be applied and because
the landscaping requirements will be addressed, and conditioned if
necessary, elsewhere within this decision, this standard can been satisfied.
Signs:
In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the
following standards shall be met:
Zoning District Regulations: non-residential development within the MUE zone shall
meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D).
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 7 OF 16
Sign Area Limits:
The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area
limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle.
• Height Limits:
The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs
shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No
height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle.
Sign Location:
Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required
L-1 landscape areas.
The applicant has not indicated signs are proposed. If a sign is requested, it must be
approved through the sign permit process as administered by the City of Tigard
Development Services Technicians. Compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at
that time. A sign permit must be obtained for ANY sign located on the property.
FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required if and when a sign
permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied.
Landscaping And Screening:
Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard
Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the
depth of the landscaping or screening are define in other sub-sections of this
section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be
substituted as long as all height limitations are met.
L-1 (Low Screen):
For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots,
local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping
and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and
minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot
and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3 1 inch caliper, at a
maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot
high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully
cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Any tree planted in excess
of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit.
L-2 (General Landscaping):
For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots,
local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping
and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2 1/2 inch caliper,
at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve
the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in
excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit.
Because the site is on a local street, the L-1 and L-2 landscape standards defer to the
planting standards of Section 18.100. These standards are discussed further in this
decision.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 8 OF 16
FINDING: Because the landscape standards of 18.100 are 1aquired in-lieu-of the L-1 or
L-2 landscape standards, and because the landscape standards of 18.100
are discussed, and conditioned if necessary, further in this decision, the
landscaping and screening standards of the Tigard Triangle have been
satisfied.
PROVISIONS OF DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTERS
Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be
consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The
applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,
18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164, MUE Standards and Tigard Triangle Design Standards.
The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following
sections.
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80
(Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94
(Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which
are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be
inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision.
Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120):
Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section
18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land
uses.
The site is surrounded by MUE to the north, south, east and west. There are existing
residences to the north and south and vacant lots to the east and west (across 69th). The
applicant has indicated there are no residential uses, however none of the immediate
surrounding properties have received approvals to change from a residence to a commercial
business, therefore they are considered residential land uses. In addition, staff did not
observe any commercial activity during a site visit on November 5, 1997. This area is zoned
MUE which will continue to allow residences. The buffering and screening requirement is to
screen from different types of uses. Because the north and south properties are currently
residential use types, the change of the site in question from residential to commercial
requires buffering and screening between the adjacent uses. The applicant has not
proposed any buffering or screening. Based on the location of the existing house, the 20-
foot required buffers are not possible, therefore, additional screening is needed to
compensate for the reduced buffer width. The following landscaping is required for buffers
as per Section 18.100.080:
1 . at least one (1) row of trees, no less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous or five (5)
feet for evergreen at time of planting;
2. at least ten (10), five (5)-gallon shrubs or 20, one (1)-gallon shrubs per 1000 square
feet of required buffer area; and
3. the remaining area must be planted in lawn, groundcover, or bark mulch.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 9 OF 16
In addition, one (1) of the following screening methods is reqL...ad: A hedge of narrow or
broad leaf evergreen shrubs which forms a four (4)-foot high continuous shrub within two (2)
years; an earthen berm planted with evergreen materials which forms a continuous screen
six (6) feet in height within two (2) years; or a five (5)-foot or taller fence or wall to provide a
continuous sight obscuring screen.
FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed landscaping within the required buffer
area between the site and the residences to the north and south, the
standards have not been met. If the applicant submits a landscape plan with
the required landscaping as described above, the Buffering and Screening
standards will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan, prepared by a landscape architect, that
shows the required buffering and screening within the buffer area along the
north and south property line.
Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas.
Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively
screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should
achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees
shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally
distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to
provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be
three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by
some form of wheel guard or curb.
The applicant has proposed Moogo Pines, less than 1" in caliper and azaleas, will be
planted alternately six (6) feet apart. Based on the distance proposed between plantings,
the landscaping will not effectively screen the parking lot as required. Staff can not confirm
without a statement from a landscape architect whether the proposed plants, at a higher
density, would create a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery.
FINDING: Because the proposed landscaping will not effectively screen the parking lot
with a balance of low lying and vertical shrubbery, this criterion has not been
satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan and confirmation by a
landscape architect that it will screen as required, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan that indicates landscaping will effectively screen the
parking lot with a balance of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The landscape
plan must be accompanied by verification from a landscape architect that the
plan meets the above outlined standards.
Street Trees:
Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street
shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section
18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart
depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large).
Tigard Triangle Design Standards (which supersedes all other code provisions) call for
spreading street trees spreading to 25 feet along local streets. The applicant has not
indicated that any street trees will be planted.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 10 OF 16
FINDING: Because the applicant has not proposed street trees, and because they are
required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and applicable code
sections, the street tree standards have not been met. If the applicant
complies with the conditions specified below, the standards will be satisfied.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan that shows the required street trees are located
within the right-of-way, no more than 25 feet apart.
Visual Clearance Areas (18.102):
Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of
all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street
and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting,
fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet
in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall
be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed
within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual
clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along
the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot
distance points with a straight line.
There appears to be landscaping proposed in the vision clearance triangle. Because the
landscaping plan must be revised, staff can not determine if the proposed landscaping will
meet the vision clearance requirements. There are no structures, other than an existing
utility pole proposed within the vision clearance triangle.
FINDING: Because the landscaping plan is being revised, staff can not determine if
landscaping within the vision clearance triangle will meet the standards. If the
landscape architect verifies that the landscaping within the vision clearance
triangle is not over three (3) feet in height, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a landscape plan indicating landscaping in the vision clearance triangle
will not grow more than three (3) feet in height. Please note: In the case that
the vision clearance standards conflict with the parking lot screening
standards, the vision clearance standards supersede.
Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) - Minimum off-street parking:
The code requires one (1) parking space per employee during the largest shift for the type of
use proposed. The applicant has indicated that there will be a total of four (4) employees
(including himself). The site plan shows four (4) parking spaces, therefore, the standard has
been met. Please be aware, that if additional employees are hired, all vehicles must be
parked on a paved surface.
Bicycle Parking:
Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15
required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall
not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways.
Because the site has between 1 and 15 parking spaces, one (1) bicycle parking space is
required. The applicant has not indicated that a bicycle space will be installed.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 11 OF 16
FINDING: Because one (1) bicycle parking space is requi.ed and the plan does not
indicate that bicycle parking has been provided for, this standard has not been
met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that includes the provision of one
(1) bicycle parking space, this standard will be met.
CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the location of one (1) bicycle parking space.
Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108):
Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99
parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a
minimum pavement width of 24 feet.
There are less that 99 parking spaces proposed. Therefore, one (1) 30-foot-wide access is
required. The applicant has indicated on the plans that a 30-foot-wide access will be
installed.
FINDING: Because the proposed access meets the requirements, this standard has
been met.
Signs (18.114 ):
Section 18.114.130(0) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the
C-G Zone.
This provision is superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which were discussed
previously in this decision.
FINDING: Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards relating to signs take
precedence, this standard does not apply.
Tree Removal (18.150)
Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of
trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review
application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees,
identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12
inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining
standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and
after construction.
There are several trees over 12-inch in caliper on the site. The applicant has indicated that
no trees will be removed. Based on the location of the trees on the site, and the proposed
and required improvements, staff agrees with the applicant's assessment that no trees must
be removed.
FINDING: Because no trees over 12-inch caliper will be removed as a result of this
proposal, this criterion has been met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 12 OF 16
Street And Utility Improvement Standards (18.164):
Streets:
This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue which is classified as a local commercial and
industrial street according to the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS). The required
right-of-way (ROW) width for this type of street is 60 feet. At present, there is 30 feet of
ROW from centerline which is adequate to meet the standard.
The street is partially paved but is not constructed to meet the minimum public standard
for a local commercial industrial street. The City Council's adoption of the TTDS requires
improvement of local streets when properties in the Triangle are developed or
redeveloped. The applicant, therefore, should be required to construct a half-street
improvements in SW 69th Avenue adjacent to this site as a part of the development in
order to mitigate the additional traffic impact.
Water:
This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District's (TVWD) service area. There is an
existing public water line within the ROW of SW 69th Avenue. The existing structure is
presently connected to the public water line. Any additional connections proposed for the
development shall be reviewed and permitted by the TVWD.
Sanitary Sewer:
There are no existing public sanitary sewer lines near this site available for service. The
closest public sewer line is approximately 1 ,200 feet to the south. Many other properties
within the Triangle are not served by the public sewer system and the City Council recently
adopted a policy that will help provide for the future extension of public sewer lines
throughout the Triangle area. The Council decided that where sites are over 300 feet
away from a public sewer line, and where the existing septic system for the site is currently
functioning adequately, the particular developer should be required to pay a fee to the City
that would be a fair-share portion of the future extension of a public sewer line to serve the
particular site. The City Engineer would need to estimate the value of the future sewer
extension and determine the fair-share fee that would be paid. For this site, since the
public sewer line is well over 300 feet away, Staff recommends that the applicant pay a
fair-share fee. An estimate of a future sewer line extension has not yet been calculated,
but would need to be both calculated and paid prior to the issuance of any building permits
for this project.
Storm Drainage:
The topography of this site falls to the west. The applicant's plan indicates that an on-site
storm drainage line will be installed along the east side of the building and will be routed to
SW 69th Avenue. This private storm line will need to be connected into the public storm
system that will be installed with the half-street improvements. The public storm drainage
system will need to be sized to accommodate the full development of the surrounding
drainage basin. In accordance with the requirements of USA's Design and Construction
Standards, the applicant's design engineer will also need to perform a downstream
analysis to determine if there will be adverse impacts to the downstream storm drainage
system because of additional storm water runoff from this parcel. If downstream impacts
are expected, the applicant will either need to make improvements to the downstream
system or provide on-site detention facility.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 13 OF 16
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards
(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which requires the construction of on-site
water quality facilities. However, the Design and Construction Standards also contain a
provision that recognizes that certain sites are unsuitable for on-site facilities because of
trouble with topography or size. This site is fairly limited in space due to the existing
building and parking needs. There does not appear to be adequate space available to
locate an on-site facility. Therefore, in accordance with the USA Standards, Staff
recommends the applicant pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility.
The fee is based on the area of new impervious surfaces and will need to be calculated by
the City's Engineering Department and paid by the Applicant prior to issuance of the site
and/or building permit.
Grading and Erosion Control:
USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the
amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any
other activity which accelerates erosion. USA regulations require that the applicant submit
an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to the issuance of City permits.
Existing Overhead Utility Lines:
There are existing overhead utility lines on SW 69th Avenue. Section 18.164.120 of the
Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development
to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of
undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal
foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan, as submitted, does not meet the
Street and Utility Improvement standards. However, if the applicant revises
the site plan, provides additional required information and makes necessary
improvements in compliance with Conditions 1-12 and 18-20 outlined on
pages 2-4 of this decision, the Street and Utility Improvement standards will
then be satisfied.
CONDITION:The applicant must comply with Conditions 1-12 and 18-20 as outlined on
pages 2-4 of this decision.
ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS
Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides additional Site
Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of
the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately
below with the following exceptions:
The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are,
therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards:
18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations);
18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise);
18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use);
18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use);
18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); and
18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces).
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 14 OF 16
The following sections wee e discussed previously in this decish-, and, therefore, will not be
addressed in this section:
18.120.180.11(Access and Circulation);
18.120.180.13(Parking);
18.120.180.14(Landscaping);
18.120.180.15(Drainage); and
18.120.180.17(Signs).
Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment:
Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees,
topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or
greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character.
The proposal is simply to change the use of an existing structure. No buildings will be added
or expanded, therefore, this standard is not applicable.
FINDING: Because the proposal does not involve the location of a new structure, this
standard does not apply.
Crime Prevention and Safety:
Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles
shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas
having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
The parking lot is for employee parking only. The site is not in a high pedestrian or vehicular
traffic area. A large customer base (if any) is not anticipated by staff, therefore, the need for
crime prevention lighting is not a requirement on this site. The applicant has not proposed
any lighting, however if any is installed, the applicant is encouraged to implement crime
prevention techniques.
FINDING: Because crime prevention lighting is not proposed or required, the criterion
regulating installation does not apply.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall
be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces
as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person
parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these
standards. This section requires 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces
are provided.
This proposal indicates that one (1) handicap parking space will be provided. The ADA
requirements for handicap accessible parking requires that at least one (1) of the parking
spaces be van accessible. The space proposed does not meet the van accessible
requirements of a nine (9)-foot space with an eight (8)-foot aisle.
FINDING: Because the plan does not provide for a handicap accessible space that
meets the required dimensions, this standard has not been met. If the
applicant submits a revised plan that shows the handicap parking space will be
9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle, this standard will be met.
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 15 OF 16
CONDITION: Submit a revised site plan that provides for a hal,ulcap accessible space of 9
feet wide with an 8-foot access aisle.
SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered
comments regarding possible requirements involved in changing the occupancy of the
buildings. These comments were forwarded to the applicant who was encouraged to meet
with a plans examiner to discuss the requirements.
The City of Tigard Property Manager, Tigard Development Technicians, Tualatin
Valley Water District, GTE, PGE, and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal
and offered no comments or objections.
SECTION VI. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY DECEMBER 1, 1997
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED.
Appeal:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections
18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides
that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below.
The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development
Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard,
Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 1, 1997.
Questions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community
Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at
(503) 639-4171 .
�� ��✓f'L_ November 20, 1997
PREPARE BY: Julia Powell ajduk DATE
Associate Pla er
November 20, 1997
APP OVED BY: Richard wersdorff DATE
Planning Manager is\curpin\julia\sdr97-12.doc
NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0012-RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PAGE 16 OF 16
I
ti U C' x — — — -- — — -- — — — —— € SW 69TH AVENUE 4 - - - - - - — - — — —
Z
ri 1
U n
V
hi vil
/ 1 I :
Pri I
I
I .- • I I I
,a
M .....Ce) I I o �
I I I
r... I ' I
,
03 ' 1 _ = , b
now no
.4 G
T
•r
,,,,,__ 1 4 ci 6,,,,01.4 1,-,....44,-, i
CA
II! Z 1 CA
1 N7hG
�� h„o.oi „
to 1
1 1 d 1I y
rm. m .
'� , o 0 0 0- o z� ,
yI r Ana u�a 1 ,.>../
I 1�uHO y
rn Pr! I I
-- 9 I I ; II -
1
7ni�y ...�r-;t" . . I� 1 �,
C) I 1
CD = (/) 1 � . II
CD CD M c Ole:• `. ' '. 1 '
or V 1 sJ r�a uyns 1I -
CD dizi Z l -- - - - - -- - - - —J
= O
�1 N
II
, 1
..
1
CD
-- — — — -- — — F SW 68TH AVENUE 4- - - - - - -- — -
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION A
\ \ - '
f a)
E
-t
j �
1 .L7:33
C
T C N_A ST ■ —
, S A\
1' .-- Q E
ri
_c_________ mil = 'Or ST
1Q r I I -no
2 ,
IIITli I ST H ' cr)
I=
CLINTON I y�
= O
_ m
cD
rn
U
DARTMOUTH ST Milk
-CIROOO ' all N SDR 91-0012
�.�..W A R ee I enta 0 f- ;e
SD/Z q- - 00(a J2hu Dti+cu 0 r' (Pa , l of a)
1S136DD-01000 1S136DD-01500 EXHIBIT B
BYLES,JACQUELINE F CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY I
- 13090 SW CARMEL ST BY JOHNSON,CA
KING CITY,OR 97224 8965 SW HAM
,OR 97223
1S136DD-01700 1S136DD-01800
CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY L P II COON,JOHN CARL
BY JOHNSON,CARL H OLSEN,MA RUSTEE
8965 SW BURNHAM 6940 AYLOR ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 ARDOR 97223
1S136DD-01900 1S136DD-01100
COON,JOHN CARL& CRAIG,MARK EDWARD&
OLSEN,MARY G TRUSTEE CRAIG,SAMULE M&PATSY J
6940 SW BAYLOR ST 18505 NE BRYAN CREEK RD
TIGARD,OR 97223 NEWBERG,OR 97132
1 S 136D D-00800 1 S 136D D-01600
FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH HARRIS,FRED L HARRIS,
11585 SW 67TH DONALD M JEANETTE A
TIGARD,OR 97223 11540 SW 70TH
TIGARD,OR 97223
1S136DD-01702 1S136DD-01701
JOHNSON,CARL H TRUSTEE LAW,JOHN C BILLIE J
8965 SW BURNHAM 6945 SW BAYLOR ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223
1S136DD-01400 1S136DD-01300
MARRS,CORDELIA W& MARRS,CORDELIA W
CARR,EDWARD J CARR,EDW
12753 SW 68TH#200 12753 8TH#200
TIGARD,OR 97223 RD,OR 97223
1S136DD-00801 1S136DD-02700
MERCER,ROSS L&VICKI L MILLER,LAVIDA E
11535 SW 67TH 6870 SW BAYLOR ST
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
1S1360A-02300 1S136DD-02600
OREGON EDUCATION ASSN SMITH,DEAN W&
6900 SW HAINES SMITH,JO ANN MONDELLI TRS
TIGARD,OR 97223 17880 SARAH HILL LN
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035
1S136DD-01200 1S136DA-02401
TIGARD TRIANGLE PROPERTIES,LL TIGARD,CITY O
11600 SW 69TH AVE 13125 LL
TIGARD,OR 97224 ARDOR 97223
614--cola D2-rrtza._ DMa- (d, ao-P )
1S136DD-03300 1S136DD-00900
VANGORDON,DORIS VINCENT,BRADFORD
- 14430 SW 94TH CT 6830 SW HAINES RD
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
PAUL P. RHEE
15675 SW PETREL COURT
BEAVERTON OR 97006
> / \
1S136DA02401
■11■1
C
a)
- E
wt
CU
n�
W
1S136DA02300 Q
rC -
c:
A T I A N A ST Om
S136DD01;DO 1S136DD01100 m0
1 136DD01-00 1S •36DDDc=DO L
CO
1S136DD01 02 1S 36DD01 ;; 15 36DDc1801
1S 36D D01,00
1S136D D01701 1S 36D D01,00 1S136DD00800 ■0)
1S1 -DD01c00
1S13•DD0 700 <
BAYLOR ST 4-
1S 36DD01910 1 .DD027110 l
0
1S13.DDI1 S136DD 3300
1S 36DD0..00
lip
-LI
> 4�
Q ■
1 i
0
,..,_________.
Vicinity Map SDR 97-0012
Notification Area Map
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
APPLICATION
CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297
GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: Z3 III a. FIK.CJ u 1z
/ r-VIg: DA TE OF PRE-APP.: G /0 —Property Address/Location(s): l 1,�/ 0 6 W t�9
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
17 e vd . 61R 9'7ZZ 3
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): Case No.(s): 5A2 9'7 -cid / L
15 13 ,j b P 0000 Other Case No.(s):
Site Size: 161 , 01 d if Receipt No.: 97-of'?�Application Accepted By: A.d�,Yl
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s) 4� Date: / .r j�
Address:' �► . Phone:
City: - Zip: — Date Determined To Be Complete:
Applicant*: ?a( {, e-e
Qt) jt iii Co mp Plan/Zone Designation:
Address: ) QIW 7 CT Phone: ‘,3‘-- 2..K3 I
City: NGf(J o'i i o K Zip: 61 7 D O
CIT Area:
*When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant
must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written �" 4/21/97 i:lcurpinar►asters1sdra.doc
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)
must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this
form or submit a written authorization with this application.
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted:
Application Form.-----
The owners of record of the subject property request Site �,/
Development Review ap royal to allow(please be specific): t� Owners Signature/Written Authorization
(b oft,. t /I DP JJla-13.614/Y1' [ /Title Transfer Instrument or Deed/� 2/Site/Plot Plan-
1 av ��11. `,5 (#of copies based on pre-app check list)
O 'r1,4/1.- ttj,.I I s .r 0- f ,-Q— 3 Site/Plot Plan(reduced 8h/2 x 11
-' j J Applicant's Statement
'rn i��� f
(#of copies based on pre-app check list)
['1 Construction Cost Estimate-
0 USA Sewer Use Information Card
(Distributed/completed at application submittal)
Filing Fee (Under$100.000) I-013
.00��'`�
(5100,000-5999.999)....$1,600.00
(S1 Million&Over) $1,780.00
(4.S5 I$10.000)
1
List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as I
part of this application:
\1C)/1 .
APPLICANTS:
To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box.
(Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• Li . • ••• . V:•• :.t- ••:r 1 • • - / • :a• I r I! •1 1 . 11 . •� • 1.• 1 :s• • • 11 ••r ti• • •1 I ' •
• If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all
the conditions and limitations of the approval.
• M of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;
and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that
any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the
requirements for approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this L/•,/r44,J..c day of // / , 19
Owner's Signature Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature X Owner's Signature
2
CITY OF TIGARD
Community Development
Shaping:11 Better Community
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
120 DAYS = 2/11/98
FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORT 97-0012
FILE TITLE: RHEE DENTAL OFFICE
APPLICANT: Paul P. Rhee OWNER: Same
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
(503) 636-2631
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to convert an
approximately 3,472 square foot existing dwelling to a Dental Office.
LOCATION: 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 01100. The site is located on
the east side of SW 69th Avenue, north of Baylor Street and south of Atlanta Street.
ZONE: Mixed Use Employment; MUE. The MUE zone allows Single-Family Attached
Residential Units, Multiple-Family Residential Units, Children's Day Care, Financial,
Insurance and Real Estate Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, Participant
Sports and Recreation, Professional and Administrative Services, General Retail
Sales, Transient Lodging, and Manufacturing of Finished Products, among other
uses.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.
CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
DECISION MAKING BODY
DATE COMMENTS DUE: Thursday October 30,1991
X STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: Thursday-November 20,1991
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00
CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER
STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner (503, 639-4171 ext. 407
SDR 97-0012 RHEE DENTAL OFFICE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
•
September 22, 1997
(:::011184,1,i4
Mr. Paul Rhee CITY OF TIGARD
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006 OREGON
RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - SDR 97-0012
Mr. Rhee:
Staff has completed a preliminary review of the application materials submitted for a
dental laboratory at 11570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 1S13600, Tax Map 01100). The
following clarifications and additional information is required before staff can consider
your application complete and begin review:
1. signature of current property owner or his written authorization;
2. applicant's statement;
3. evidence of a neighborhood meeting. You were given information on the
required neighborhood meeting at the pre-application meeting. I have enclosed
an additional packet for your convenience. Please be aware that you must
notice this meeting to property owners within 250 feet two (2) weeks before you
conduct the meeting;
4. clarify the landscape plan. The following is required:
a. Description of the irrigation system where applicable (for landscaping)
b. proposed landscaping. It looks like you are proposing to install 6" caliper
scotch pine in the landscape strip. According to the western garden book
these trees grow to be 70 -100 feet in height. Please verify if this is truly what
you had intended in this area. If it is not, please indicate what plant species
will be planted. For your assistance, I have enclosed a copy of the Tigard
Triangle landscape requirements and the landscaping requirements in 18.100
of the Development Code;
c. Trees to be removed. It is unclear if the trees you have shown are existing
or proposed and whether there are additional trees not shown that will be
removed. You must indicate whether any trees will be removed and show
them all.
d. Additional impervious surface. Please indicate if areas not paved will be
covered with lawn, shrubs, bark dust, etc.; and
e. Required screening. While this is not a requirement for submittal, you may
want to indicate how you will screen from adjacent residential properties.
This will be required prior to final site plan approval and it is better to plan for
it at this time rather than have to redesign something at a later date.
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
Page 1 of 2
5. properties within 25 feet. Any structures within 25 feet of the property lines
must be shown. If there are no structures on adjacent property within 25 feet of
the property line, please indicate that in your narrative;
6. clarify Storm Drainage. A storm drain line is shown but it's not indicate how
run-off ties into it (catch basins, roof drains, etc.) or where it goes off-site;
7. clarify Sanitary Sewer. It's not indicated exactly what will be done to comply
with the City's Sanitary Sewer requirements. This must be in writing and should
be included in your narrative. According to the letter from Jim Hendryx, the City
has agreed to accept a fee in-lieu of requiring full improvements at this time.
The fee is based on engineering estimates acceptable to the City Engineer. You
have not provided estimates or indicated that the fee in-lieu will be paid prior to
final site development review approval;
8. site size and dimensions;
9. contour lines; and
10. square footage of all structures.
I am enclosing a copy of the submittal checklist I provided you with. The missing
information is highlighted. I am also enclosing a copy of the pre-app notes with
information highlighted that you may have overlooked.
Once the required information has been submitted, staff will deem the application
complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with
all standards in effect, at the time the application is deemed complete. The 5-6 week
estimated time to render a decision is from the date the application is accepted as
complete so, the sooner the required information is submitted, the quicker a decision
can be issued.
Please feel free to contact me concerning this information or if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Julia Powell Haj uk
Associate Planner
i:\curpin\julia\SDR97-12.1et
Enclosures
c: SDR 97-0012 land use file
Henry Lee
Mr. Rhee Page 2 of 2
9/22/97 SDR 97-0012 Incomplete Letter
•
September 22, 1997
Mr. Paul Rhee , CITY OF TIGARD
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006 OREGON
RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - SDR 97-0012
Mr. Rhee:
Staff has completed a preliminary review of the application materials submitted for a
dental laboratory at 11570 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Map 01100). The
following clarifications and additional information is required before staff can consider
your application complete and begin review:
1. signature of current property owner or his written authorization;
2. applicant's statement; "'(`e'` ,-
3. evidence of a neighborhood meeting. You were given information on the
required neighborhood meeting at the pre-application meeting. I have enclosed
an additional packet for your convenience. Please be aware that you must
notice this meeting to property owners within 250 f-- .. • - •- ore you
conduct the meeting;
4. clarify the landscape plan. The following is required:
a. Description of the irri n-system.where applicable (for landscaping)
b. proposed landscaping. It looks like you are proposing to install 6" caliper
scotch pine in the landscape strip. According to the western garden book
these trees grow to be 70 -100 feet in height. Please verify if this is truly what
you had intended in this area. If it is not, please indicate what plant species
will be planted. For your assistance, I have enclosed a copy of the Tigard
Triangle landscape requirements and the landscaping requirements in 18.100
of the Development Code;
c. Trees to be removed. It is unclear if the trees you have shown are existing
or proposed and whether there are additional trees not shown that will be
removed. You must indicate whether any trees will be removed and show
them all.
d. Additional impervious surface. Please indicate if areas not paved will be
covered with lawn, shrubs, bark dust, etc.; and
e. Required screening. While this is not a requirement for submittal, you may
want to indicate how you will screen from adjacent residential properties.
This will be required prior to final site plan approval and it is better to plan for
it at this time rather than have to rede�Sign s9mething at a later date.
l 444r1 - r
4'
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
Page 1 of 2
5. properties within 25 feet. Any structures within 25 feet of the property lines
must be shown. If there are no structures on adjacent property within 25 feet of
the property line, please indicate that in your narrative;
iv vn{
6. clarify Storm Drainage. A storm drain line is shown but it's not indicate how
run-off ties into it (catch basins, roof drains, etc.) or where it goes off-site;
7. clarify Sanitary Sewer. It's not indicated exactly what will be done to comply
with the City's Sanitary Sewer requirements. This must be in writing and should
be included in your narrative. According to the letter from Jim Hendryx, the City
has agreed to accept a fee in-lieu of requiring full improvements at this time.
The fee is based on engineering estimates acceptable to the City Engineer. You
have not providedestimates or indicated that the fee in-lieu will be paid prior to
final site development review approval;
8. site size and dimensions;
9. contour lines; and -1 Ii �': ,01'
10. square footage of all structures.
I am enclosing a copy of the submittal checklist I provided you with. The missing
information is highlighted. I am also enclosing a copy of the pre-app notes with
information highlighted that you may have overlooked.
Once the required information has been submitted, staff will deem the application
complete and begin the review process. An application is reviewed for compliance with
all standards in effect, at the time the application is deemed complete. The 5-6 week
estimated time to render a decision is from the date the application is accepted as
complete so, the sooner the required information is submitted, the quicker a decision
can be issued.
Please feel free to contact me concerning this information or if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Julia Powell Haj uk
Associate Planner
i:\curpin\julia\SDR97-12.1et
Enclosures
c: SDR 97-0012 land use file
Henry Lee
Mr. Rhee Page 2 of 2
9/22/97 SDR 97-0012 Incomplete Letter
October 2, 1997
City of Tigard
Planning Department
Attn: Julia Hajduk
13125 SW Ha11 Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Re: Additional information and clarifications on submittal #SDR97-0012
1. & 2. I (Paul Rhee) applying for conditional use or site plan review on the
property located at lots 5,6,7 & 8, Block 2, West Portland Heights,
in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon to
convert existing dwelling to Dental Lab. I will hire 2 employees
besides my self and my wife. I understand for the Zoning Designation
(MUE) that a Dental Lab is qualified.
Paul Rhee (owne aex / J 4'2
Signed Date / o 3. Evidence of Neighborhood Meeting mailed and submitted to Planning
Department. Notice of meeting is posted and mailed September 25,1997.
4. Clarify the Landscape plan
a. Description of irrigation system manual watering 480 sq. ft
existing and 400 sq. ft. west side by the parking lot.
b. We will abide 18.100 landscaping requirements:
Less than 1" caliper Moogo Pine and Azalias,
Height is less than two (2) feet; will be planted 6 feet apart
alternately.
c. None of the existing trees will be removed from the premises.
d. Unpaved will be covered with shrubs and bark dust.
Page 2 (continued) SDR97-0012
e. No existing residential uses, landscaping, screening and buffering
is used.
5. There is no property within 25 feet.
6. Down spouts connected to storm drain system as indicated on separate sheet,
goes off site and existing system. Exhibit "A"
7. Sewer connection fee estimate made by former owner, Mark Craig. Exhibit`B".
Deposit to City of Tigard for future sewer connection.
8. Site size and dimensions; 100x100 .23ac
9. Contour lines: County record
10. Square footage of all structures
Bldg. Sq. ft. 1,652
1"Flr Sq. ft. 1,262
Porch Sq. ft. 166
Attic Sq. ft. 392
S 1�`j.;S \
k ; V �� f
Si U v �vai��
NOTE b,,_o
69th' AVENUE I li I - •- ... .
CD :0. is : Rs 'R t =��
� } D. I
D
-"6 ;
U'U lU 'Ui Uc: UGrl+l rx''M v''u. Cvv' . 1'„' OilU1L1 rUUI/UUO
C `k LAW OFFICE OF ✓10- +3
PAUL M. NELSON
4040 DOUGLAS WAY
P.O.BOX 403
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034
(503)635-7173
September 10, 1997
Mr. Dan Holz VIA FAX ONLY- 293-4300
John L. Scott Realty
10620 S.W. Greenburg Road
Suite 250
Tigard, OR 97223
Mr. Henry Lee VIA FAX ONLY-671-0121
Century 21 Columbia Realty
9020 S.W. Washington Square Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Ms. Loyce Sorrell VIA FAX ONLY-244-8377
First American Title
10260 S.W. Greenburg Rd.
Suite 170
Portland, OR 97223
Re: Craig to Rhee
Special Escrow Instruction
Dear Mr. Holz, Mr. Lee & Ms. Sorrell:
Enclosed is a proposed form of Special Escrow Instruction concerning the
payment-in-lieu of sewer construction that will be required by the City of Tigard_
Please review the enclosed Instruction and contact me with any questions or
concerns that you might have.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
Paul M. Nelson
PMN:jb
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Mark Craig
Uy 1U Ji UL:UG1'M rr'JM L '. WA1 CLLJ. 1„ Gi1U1 .1 rUU : UU'
•
SPECIAL ESCROW INSTRUCTION
1. From the proceeds of the transaction at closing due to Seller, there
shall be withheld the sum of$8,115.25 to be placed in a separate, interest bearing
account, to be disbursed under the following terms and conditions:
(a) Buyer and Seller acknowledge and contemplate that the
Tigard City Council has agreed to accept payment-in-Iieu of sewer construction.
The in-lieu of payment will satisfy the zoning or land use condition of connecting
to the sewer. Attached hereto as Exhibit A, and by this reference incorporated
herein, is a letter from James N.P. Hendryx, Director of Community Development
for the City of Tigard,to Dan Holz dated August 19, 1997.
(b) Attached hereto as Exhibit B, and by this reference
incorporated herein, is Payment-In-Lieu Estimate for Sewerline Construction
prepared by Westlake Consultants, Inc., which estimates that the cost of
construction of the required sewer is $8,115.25.
(c) Said amount, $8,115.25, shall remain in the special escrow
holdback account created pursuant to this Special Escrow Instruction until such
time as the City of Tigard requires that the funds be transferred into a City owned
or managed account.
(d) No disbursement of funds from this special escrow holdback
shall be allowed for any purpose other than the payment-in-lieu sewer estimate as
described herein.
(e) The signature of Seller shall be required to disburse funds
from this account
(f) At the time of transfer of funds from the escrow holdback to
the City of Tigard, the special account created pursuant to this instrument shall be
closed and all interest accruing on the funds deposited in the account shall become
the sole property of Seller. Seller shall be responsible for the payment of any
charges or costs associated with the special account.
Page 1 - Special Escrow Instruction
09-1U-97 02: 06PM FROM LO, "?At BLDG. TO 6710121 P003-005
(g) The parties understand that the City of Tigard may require
that a non-remonstration agreement be signed by Buyer and Seller as part of the
Site Development Review process and allow occupancy of the property by Buyer.
Buyer and Seller both agree to sign such an agreement.
:a,4,t)e "( e e
Mark Craig, Seller aul P. Rhee : yer
Dated: Dated: /j/•
Soo Nam e, Buyer
Dated: ,
Accepted and Approved:
First American Title Insurance Company
By:
Page 2 - Special Escrow Instruction
U9-1U-y'i 02:061M FROM DO. WAY BLDG. TO 6710121 F' -;J :
+ 69/19/97 11:33 ;;`563 , 7297 CITY OF TIGA,RD
Z00°. 00?
August 19, 1997
7- Ali
.,,,!1:4:_-_-:iL....
nnr. Dail Holz CITY OF !IGARD
John L. Scott R,stty
10260 SW Graenburg Rd., Suite 250 OREGON
Tigard, OR 97223
—,--1
RE: 1i570 SW 69TH AVENUE
The potential buyer of this property had a pre-application meeting with Associate Planner
Julia Hajduk regarding a Site Development Review (SCR) for a change of use from
resldantiai to retail or denial office. At that meeting, she Informed the buyer that there would
be certain conditions associated with the SDR. One of those conditions applies to
connecting the property to the City sanitary sewer.
In response to your requests this letter is to clarify that the Tigard City Council has agreed to
accept payment in lieu of sewer construction at this time. The in-lieu-of payment will satisfy
the condition of connecting to tha sewer until Is available in the future. The amount of this
payment will be based upon engineering estimates acceptable to the City Engineer.
Provided that the septic tank on this parcel has been approved and certified by Washington
County, the new property owner will not have to connect to the sanitary sewer prior to
occupancy of the changed use.
Flnaa-e be aware'hat'this payment will only satisfy one of the conditions of the SDR. if
there are other conditions as a result of the SbR, they must be satisfied prior to
occupancy of the building, Please refer to the attached pre-application notes as a guide
car potential SDR conditions. As of today, the City has not yet received a formal application
for a site Development Review on this property. It takes approximately 5-6 weeks to process
the SOR once the fonnsl application has been received and deemed complete-
Sincerely, ^->
:.i.r. 1-landryx
Director of Community Development
E::clo�L re
C: Land Use tile.
Henry La&. Century 21 Re21ty
Paul Rhee
mart: Craig
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TOD (503)684.2772- - _
e)( - ft
k_yg; `--2: 634 7;:97 u3-Iy-37 1I :32AM P002 530
09-1U-9'i 02:061M FPUM DU. WAY BLL'J. TO b710121 PUU5i005
PAYMENT-IN-LIEU ESTIMATE FOR SEWERLINE CONSTRUCTION
1
Address: 11570 SW 69th Avenue, Tigard,Oregon
Length of Street Front Footage: 100.00'
installed
Item Item Description Quantity Unit 1 Unit Price Cost
1 8"Gravity Sewerline(granular backfill) 100.001 L.F. I _ S80.00 $8,000.00
2 48-Standard Manhole (every 400') 0.25L Each $2,000.00 $500.00
3 4"Side Sewers(one each side) 60.001 L.F. $30.00 $1,800.00
4 Pavement Restoration (trench width) 160.00. L.F. $25.00 $4,000.00
r- ' Construction Subtotal $14,300.00
E&A Engineering and Administration 13.50%1
>> Overall Subtotal $15230.50
»> Apportioned Cost for 1 Side of Street 50.00%. r U,115.25
Westlake Consultants, Inc. CRAIGEST-XIS Date: August 14. 1997
6(- g
�S t n M E R 1 C 9
�� .,. First Amei'can Title Insurance Com tiny of Oregon
,'--n €f ,..\- An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON
�Lg WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICES
e BEAVERTON LINCOLN TOWER TANASBOURNE
4650 S.W.Griffith Dr.,Suite 100 10260 S.W.Greenburg Rd.Suite 170 2554 N.W. 185th Ave.
Beaverton,Oregon 97005-8720 Portland,OR 97223 Portland,Oregon 97229-3579
(503)641-7000 (503)244-8323 (503)645-0320
FAX(503)627-0921 FAX(503)244-8377 FAX(503)645-6351
September 24, 1997
CENTURY 21 COLUMBIA
Attn: HENRY LEE
9020 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE DR.
TIGARD, OR 97223
Re: Escrow No. : 97051267
Buyer: RHEE, PYUNG & SOO NAM
Seller: CRAIG, MARK
Property: 11570 SW 69TH AVENUE
TIGARD, OR 97223
Congratulations on the closing of your transaction! It is our pleasure
to send you a copy of the final documentation for your records. A copy
has been sent to your closing department along with your commission check.
We at First American Title would like to take this opportunity to
let you know it has been a privilege closing this transaction for you.
We look forward to the next one! We invite you to call us for all your
title and escrow needs.
Sincerely,
First American Title Insurance
Company of Oregon
Lincoln Tower
L-4-(:-M/-(4-:71/
t-
Loyce E. Sorel
Escrow Officer
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
A M E R ,
S C
First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon
r� „ An assumed business name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON
WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICES
BEAVERTON LINCOLN TOWER TANASBOURNE
4650 S.W.Griffith Dr.,Suite 100 10260 S.W.Greenburg Rd.Suite 170 2554 N.W. 185th Ave.
Beaverton,Oregon 97005-8720 Portland,OR 97223 Portland,Oregon 97229-3579
(503)641-7000 (503)244-8323 (503)645-0320
FAX(503)627-0921 FAX(503)244-8377 FAX(503)645-6351
BUYER'S CLOSING STATEMENT
ESCROW STATEMENT OF: Escrow: 97051267
PYUNG NAI RHEE Escrow Officer: Loyce E. Sorrell
SOO NAM RHEE Date: September 24, 1997
Title Order No: 823273
Property Purchased From: MARK EDWARD CRAIG SAMUEL M. CRAIG
PATSY J. CRAIG
Property Address: 11570 SW 69TH AVENUE TIGARD, OR 97223
ITEMS DEBITS CREDITS
TOTAL CONSIDERATION 194,000.00
ADDITIONAL DEPOSITS TO ESCROW 68,753.86
NEW TRUST DEED TO: STERLING SAVINGS ASSOCIATION 126,100.00
PRORATIONS/ADJUSTMENTS FROM TO
TAX ACCOUNT 1S136DD-01100
FOR TAX YEAR 1997/98 AT $1,557.66 07/01/97 09/24/97 362.75
COMMERCIAL USE APP. CREDIT 800.00
REAL ESTATE BROKER COMMISSION(S)
CREDIT FROM COMMISSION FOR EARNEST MONEY 2,000.00
TITLE CHARGES - FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO.
MORTGAGEES EXTENDED POLICY FOR $126,100.00 207.00
ENDORSEMENT: 100, 116, 8.1 50.00
ENDORSEMENT: BALLOON 50.00
RECORDINGS
CONVEYANCE/DEED 38.00
MORTGAGE/TRUST DEED(S) 88.00
TRANSFER TAX 97.00
ESCROW CHARGES - First American Title
ESCROW FEE 300.00
DELIVERY FEE 35.00
LENDER CHARGES
NEW LOAN CHARGES TO STERLING SAVINGS
LOAN FEE 1,261.00
FLOOD INQUIRY 20.00
BROKERED LOAN CHARGES TO: GENESIS MORTGAGE, INC.
LOAN FEE 1,060.00
ADDITIONAL DISBURSEMENTS
FIRE INSURANCE PREMIUM TO: FARMERS INSURANCE 596.00
BALANCE DUE YOU 214.61
TOTALS 199,016.51 198,016.61
PYUNG NAI RHEE SOO NAM RHEE
Certified to be a True and Exact Copy
Delivered to Buyer and/or Seller.
i�
Li �' � 1�? //
w '
Escrow Officer: Loyce E. Sorrell
Lincoln Tower
Recording Date: SEPTEMBER 24, 1997
FINAL STATEMENT
to .
,_ - ‘ 1--*: .
, ) ; -,-,-
. frill
{' , �^4 �/' PORN M,.MI-a01MN Mtn RIIt a tats-RllnOtw PORE LIIIIRtIONI e.ese. wtwna e v rraNNtr to Will OM OM
i.is d" WHAM APO MY 0000-11TATUTEORY PORMI
'S.. 4,4 y',.r. I y.}* ,+� INDIVIDUAL GRANTOR
-n, i i 1.1,- Orard*x
X11.:.: '•-•-.:(......,. conveys to..(�4.4!f.147CSt.. l ,is_A!!_. ._lipt�lltvided / iatarwt Sasoal Ha<
_-„;,.. t ..r...11...J.:.4�F.!F.4s.,...k4llMFTg...4...x.7, ...lr�t...... ..tmtdlvi... 1L2_�a.anut�_� _ _.....
'w ._.._....__..»....__...»......... . __._....Grantee,the following real property sitrsatad in JaaLlagtaa ---
.r >E• ':. County,Oregon,to-wit:
(h Lots 5, 6, 7 and B, Block 2, West Portland Heights, in the City of Tigard, Washington
-_,,,,?!`t/.--__:., :`. ^• Q County, Oregon.
tfl
. t ii
,..i” ,,eit: III
w. -
>,w,,
," ut srACa INSUFFICIENT.CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE slob
`�'' � . The try* consideration for this conveyance is $ -0 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030)
r`} " A r? )o add mother and father to title, a transfer of love and affection
:rte .
7" F; _ Dated this. day of.......$■P.tt».. ...,19.. x!�% _/�.
�'' . -,.I A :' THIS INSTR MIENT YMRL MR ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESC D N TMS _
4. ,4 = - INSTRUMENT N V1ClATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAMS AND FEOULAMCNS. r Edward Craig
: a...-;'„.-
• ' BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPRINO TINS THE PERSON ACOUIRNG FEE _...... ..
- ' TITLE 10 THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH TI€ CRTY OR COUNTY
z re PLAtNNG DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES ANDS)DETERMINE ANY
z r o LIMITS ON LINSUITS AGAINST RAISING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED N
� ORS 311.9Xt STATE OF OREGON,County of....._.._... 14 M7I at...»..» )ss. /-7\4•-
This instrument was acknowledged before me on. $�4JIH12AlC A , 19. 6..,•
••. ft� '4% Mark Edward Craig .... ,•..
,0•- M1 r { yy OF'FM!AL S J1L Y•
4.• . :._-: I ' �.. 'K:*Apr-I.-- At.tuoN r i t lic far Oregon
e � E • ,,'..• d gt a IIN: My oorrmiw,on expires._.._..i.- T .5'
s' ' BARGAIN AND SALE DEED
h.f' 7" II! hark Eduard Craig STATB OF OREGO ,
-, s. r..!t;,.' ...... . .....oa 1141.
J}
.,.',r j-: =:r'. . Mark Edward Craig,d Cig, etal County of
y._ 1 certify that the within instru-
Ss 7c '"' ment was received for record on the
.'•-.f•Y: - Arne roe,eeelne morn h. day of . 19
Mark Edward Craig .••.t Sr o'clock ,and recorded
.. v.,,, g in book/reel/volume No on
.._ +-"A 18505 NE Bryan Creek Road 'on �•Qe or as lee/file/instru-
OR 97132 't`°•°tt t Jilt
:,-,- Newberg, mint/microfilm/reception No
'4 7-1- _
,t �.:-1 .■r[.•oottst.tI• Record a Deeds o! said county.
Witness my hand and teal at
°_-v-.: - um* •d.aq„ Is,MwsM,ea ewe „es+e enls
County affixed.
'it."‘• —be—to lie P,Nr•rleR sieret,.
tv�'. .. as above
..re Tins
z• `� , By..._............__._»..*.—.—...Deputy
Olt. .
dt,•.r,
0
1. •
0 z . ■A
••■• •‘"t..1,3/1P.
'• ,••••'.
. • ■I ' *
c :S4q,■.
117471 OF OREOON -
, r County of
a.. / IS
..• - .
mink J.rrY 41,- :"..„.s.- of Ammo-
co • .
pith .. 4%--..%.*■•'...,..;:.74i:AtAo• County .,..:
•• ,
the Aii. 1 ,....:,,,,,,,,:.....- that
and •-•-•, -- "- 4.1+.,.,. - • •.gt..:-
, iii r!: `k....0.-t,se AO • amid
-,_
•-r----
littt•• •;.,remia-..
, ..e,...., -
,........_ _. ..... . .
selkl. „,... •• of ..; .;.._-
......., • Ex- ,....„-
-.-. ' • •...; : t s •
- .
.. .• Doc t 96087406
'-• --7,- -'1,
Rect: 172707 36. 00
09/30/1996 11: 11:33am
. . ,
z...• ? 'f'A.-';
. •:-
.r. '
- . .,...' ',..
--' - .-
. , .
' :r•,
. .
.--.
- ..• . .
".1.•
• -..' -.;,-t'.--
•
...- t
.
• '1
‘ -_ $.■
2:".• -•
.. ..1.• -
--r - •
47...• , - .
-4.
.... .....
/ •■• CP8■•• l •
:.
.. -
•.
. .. - .
•
41144:**".**0*.%**2. :•;.*‘41'.4'''e. ..ri
. - -"'- •':C`,i.#4,_,i.::,-iJ6ii.,,-_,..,44,...644; ' . . • '. ..
STEWART TITLE OF ./REGON, INC. - CUSTOMER Sh__.ICE DEPARTMENT
PHONE 671-0525 ; NITE OWL 671-0535
= M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R O F I L E =
Washington County
*
*
* OWNERSHIP INFORMATION *
* *
* Reference Parcel # :1S136DD 01100 *
* Parcel Number :R0285907 TRSQ: 01S-01W-36-SE SE *
* Owner :CRAIG MARK EDWARD & SAMUEL M & PATSY J *
* CoOwner *
* Site Address : 11570 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD 97223 *
* Mail Address : 18505 NE BRYAN CREEK RD NEWBERG OR 97132 *
* Telephone :Owner 503 -538-4137 Tenant *
*
* SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION *
*
* Transferred: 09/30/96 Loan Amount *
* Document # : 87406 Lender *
* Sale Price : Loan Type *
* Deed Type :BARGAIN & SALE Interest Rate: *
* % Owned :100 Vesting Type : *
*
* ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION *
*
* Land : $47, 550 Exempt Amount: *
* Structure : $54, 740 Exempt Type *
* Other % Improved :54 *
* Total : $102, 290 Levy Code : 02381 *
* 96-97Taxes : $1, 416 . 05 School Dist :TIGARD *
*
*
* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION *
*
* Map Grid: 655 G3 Class Code:R14 *
* Census :Tract 307 . 00 Block 1 *
* NbrhdCd :DMTG MillRate : 13 . 8436 *
* Sub/Plat:WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS *
* Land Use: 1012 RES, IMPROVED *
* Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 2, LOT *
* • : 5-8, ACRES . 23 *
*
*
* PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS *
*
* Bedrooms : 3 Lot Acres : . 23 Year Built :1928 *
* Bathrooms : 1 . 00 Lot SqFt : 10, 018 EffYearBlt :1950
* Heat Method:FORCED BsmFin SF : Floor Cover:CARPET *
* Pool BsmtnfinSF : Foundation :CONCRETE FTG *
* Appliances : BsmLowSF Roof Shape :GABLE *
* Dishwasher : Bldg SqFt : 1, 652 Roof Matl :WD SHAKE *
* Hood Fan lstFlrSqFt:1, 262 InteriorMat:PLASTBR *
* Deck : UpperFlSF : Paving Matl: *
* Garage Type : Porch SgFt: l66 Coast Type :ND STUD\SHTG *
* Garage SF Attic SqFt:390 Ext Finish :HORIZONTAL ND *
*
* Deck SqFt :
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
�'-- • (►LAT1 \�.�C • `^V(�II ; ATLANTA / / STRELT x li
v V :T'. • 1 24 eva I
25' t, 60' ; ao' tao' r V / 700100+ / 2.�' •- 100 0
D _ .3 / � iC-1111�I .Z.7 : A �r .. �. 474C.
23 b Z 13 3 22 1 % .II AG {'� 3 b ��;
i- t 22 b W t 4 21 b / � 4 tc.a.11:($3I>t b � 4 21 1 - '
�� .
21 > 20 / 5 20 b +Z e 5 20 b� °°' V+8
Q II 00
20 1 b .23 AC. 2 ■9 b ! 1 6 3 19 I (V 6 +4 19 W
19 7 1400 t 1 18 1 Q 8 301 ..a AG 18 b} i W Aft
IQ
zs b b 8 .� It b,sd •1 so' �7 4 A G + 17 400 .O r AG 6 H 0 0 c. 1--
T I 1 1 1 1 T T '�' T T T i T T T T '� ;� Q I
1700 1200 1300 g W 04 U L I g 4 �""
./7 AC. --QQ .23 AG ./6AG = _
15 16 FT . b II 12 13 14 15 S > 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 112 $9 10 I I 12 13 14 15 la I i
Q 13•S 1 Ili 1 zs'. ,tie t 15' I is•1 r' 1 1 1 .4 at I as' tad Iasi 1 I as'I!s' r to 1!d 1 sff I:e' ss'I e t re i re 1 ,0 L. W
so-w1 I" +
BAYLOR STREETS Z
5' • se ,ss'T as' (!6'1 2f1' ts'1 se'i nil sal VT lie Id sr T s5'iG if'' s$ 1 se- N. tss'I is'i ss' se Ise Irk ss`T ss'7 .d .°
1800 b2700 2600 sd 3300 3301 3900 3800
J2 4 .23AG .34 AG .2SA G .%AC. �! .I7Aa �t.t/4C
7 8 9� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 4 5 6 7 81 wl 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 F.
I I I 1 J. 1 ' --L—L.--1--f--1-1-17 1 I 1 1 1 ..I o
38 b 2eoo - �0 3402 + 1 4000 to 36 t ;,g i
37 : J7AC 35, , t .6S AC. 35 b .l9AG ---
. + k i _. - +
36 b I I1 3290 73 1 1 I 3700 8 ' 11 i ' 34 -13
35 14 b 2890 .A6AG .12 AG a 13 12 + .25 AC. -
la 12 33
a
b
)0 t tt 2900 A 3200 1 t 13 8+ 32 t b , . -L' 32 � N a
I C o .23 AC. r .22 AC. 8+ '" 7 -t -
M L 14 31 I �� MAf' FU IiE 1) A.; I.
a _ 1 �, 4100 CON -341 h.. Iv(
.
)0 b t .+ 15 30 t F 15 — 3600 spa' .41 AC Q"E t-\t' �► TIM=
L1_
- I w 16 — 29 I_t_, ; '^03 ; 16 16 11, r� w Ne ' if Jt.\ AND I)r ll. • I+',I.
I, W Ih I- NlHE.LOC -.li i; A,IY1'.14'r(1�'(Nrf:1!,
30 2 CO 10 3000 _ 3001 „ 17 3403 1 17 (l1[ (QQPANYit'� iti�k`i No 11Ab1L11Y I Idfi
1' ,1,HEREIM 1 ' I
2j b !s ./8Ac. .32AC. L 18 - ./2 AG 18 1471118d� _� -- ---
6
57, cr-D
<--Poticvq LI , 0-0- 0
( pa
?0„,k,‘,„1
U s
Li d � ��
OffliA s 10 , 000
ef-4 g 41-01-44,
7
INvva
tam
BENGE
September 3, 1997
c c>nsTl:c1� � ,oN co.
"BENGE MAKES THE GRADE"
Century 21
ATTN: Henry Lee 19MOMORP
Fax # 503-671-0121
RE: Parking Lot 8 11570 SW 69th Ave.
Tigard, OR 97223
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
The following quote based on plans & specifications
1. Excavation (leveling existing lot) $996 .06
2 . Crushed base rock $1,695 .00
Paving 2" Asphalt $3,866.02
4. Curbing (50' ) and (72' ) Striping $400.00
TOTAL = $6,957.08
All excavation, rocking and paving based on 3,300 SQ.FT. scheduling
of work to fit our schedule.
Qualifications: No traffic control, and sawcuts. Bid based on one
move-in. Bid is for on-site paving only.
} Benge Construction Co. is a certified M/DBE Business.
Unless specifically stated otherwise above, the Work does not include permits,
fees, assessments, soils or materials testing, surveying, geotechnical services,
and civil engineering. The Bid Price does not include sales tax and is valid for
30 days from above date. Benge Construction Co. will have no obligation under its
contract for the work to locate, analyze, remediate, treat or dispose of
hazardous wastes, hazardous substances, or environmental pollution. This proposal
to be incorporated into the subcontract.
Thank you for the opportunity to quote on this project.
If you have any questions, or we can be of further service, please
call.
BENGE CONSTRUCTION CO.
Bob Knott
Estimator
P.O. BOX 886 • TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 • PH: (503) 222-4047 • FAX: (503) 682-3777
,''�► `- A EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
DBE CERTIFIED COfYTRACTOR ,;a
VV VU J V1 1V+•+ ++'•�++ + 1• "•• -- - . - U 11V1:.1 + VV1. VVr
•
LAW OFFICE OF
PAUL M. NELSON
4040 DOUGLAS WAY
P.O.BOX 403
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 47034
(503)635-7773
August 8, 1997
VIA FAX -671-0121
AND REGULAR MAIL
Mr, Henry Lee
Century 21 Columbia Realty
9020 S.W. Washington Square Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: 11570 S.W. 69th, Tigard, Oregon
Craig to Rhee
Dear Mr. Lee:
This office represents Mark Craig with respect to the above transaction.
Enclosed for your review and presentation to Mr. and Mrs. Rhee is a proposed
Special Escrow Instruction concerning the creation of a escrow holdback from
the closing proceeds of the transaction for the construction of the sewer line
required by the City of Tigard. Please review the enclosed at your earliest
convenience and call me with your comments or suggestions.
Could you also advise me regarding any other issues that remain
outstanding from the buyers' prospective.
Thank you for your professional courtesies and cooperation.
Very truly yours,
1,
Paul M. Nelson
PMN:jb
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Mark Craig
Mr. Dan Holz
VV VV Vi Vl • 1Vain a::VUa ■•.., r116 YLY'i. 1 VIIUI�a aVV:.: VVG
■
SPECIAL ESCROW INSTRUCTION
1. From the proceeds of the transaction at closing due to Seller, there shall be withheld
the sum of$25,000.00 to be placed in an escrow holdback, to be disbursed under the following terms
and conditions:
a. The purpose of the holdback is to pay for the design and construction of a
sanitary sewer from the property to the nearest existing connection point, to be paid for by Seller.
The parties contemplate that installation of a pump will be required to make the sewer connection.
b. The design and installation of the sewer shall be pursuant to the design and
specifications prepared by Westlake Consultants, attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference
incorporated herein.
c. Any changes or modifications to the design and specifications set forth in
Exhibit A shall be approved solely by Seller, and subject to the consent of the City of Tigard.
d. Closing shall proceed without the actual construction of the sewer line.
Construction of the sewer line shall be completed on or before f'D t r -
e. The signature of Seller shall be required to disburse funds from this escrow
holdback. If the contractor constructing the sewer lines so requires, interim disbursement of funds
shall be allowed prior to completion of the project.
f No disbursement of funds from this escrow holdback shall be allowed for any
purpose except the design and construction of the sewer line contemplated herein, the pump required
as part of the system, expenses for street renovation and reconstruction and utility relocation, if
required, in connection with the construction of the sewer line and the cost of any permits or fees
required in connection with this project.
g. Upon completion of the construction project and its acceptance by the City
of Tigard, any funds remaining in the escrow holdback shall be promptly disbursed to Seller, and
Buyer shall have no claim whatsoever, at any time, to any of the funds in the escrow holdback.
h. The parties understand that the City of Tigard may require that a non-
remonstration agreement be signed by Buyer and Seller in order to approve the sewer connection
Buyer and Seller both agree to sign such an agreement.
Mark Craig, Seller Paul P. Rhee, Buyer
Dated' Dated:
Soo Nam Rhee, Buyer
Dated:
UO-U0 U i U1 • iQj1+1 CI.JLL L J. I7A1 LLL'I, 1'V U 1U1C1 j UU1' UUC
LAW OFFICE OF
PAUL M. NELSON
4040 DOUGIAS WAY
P.O.BOX 403
LAKE OSWEGO,OREGON 97034
(503)635.7773
August 8, 1997
VIA FAX - 671.0121.
AND REGULAR MAIL
Mr. Henry Lee
Century 21 Columbia Realty
9020 S.W. Washington Square Drive
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: 11570 S.W. 69th, Tigard, Oregon
Craig to Rhee
Dear Mr_ Lee:
This office represents Mark Craig with respect to the above transaction.
Enclosed for your review and presentation to Mr. and Mrs. Rhee is a proposed
Special Escrow Instruction concerning the creation of a escrow holdback from
the closing proceeds of the transaction for the construction of the sewer line
required by the City of Tigard. Please review the enclosed at your earliest
convenience and call me with your comments or suggestions.
Could you also advise me regarding any other issues that remain
outstanding from the buyers' prospective.
Thank you for your professional courtesies and cooperation.
Very truly yours,
r0G ''--i,� ,Ize..'4)7__
Paul M. Nelson
PMN:jb
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Mark Craig
Mr. Dan Holz
Utl Uv yi Ui : 1M riVa4 UV, Y'tl ruuG; UU
SPECIAL ESCROW INSTRUCTION
1. From the proceeds of the transaction at closing due to Seller, there shall be withheld
the sum of 525,000.00 to be placed in an escrow holdback, to be disbursed under the following terms
and conditions:
a. The purpose of the holdback is to pay for the design and construction of a
sanitary sewer from the property to the nearest existing, connection point, to be paid for by Seller.
The parties contemplate that installation of a pump will be required to make the sewer connection.
b. The design and installation of the sewer shall be pursuant to the design and
specifications prepared by Westlake Consultants, attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference
incorporated herein.
c. Any changes or modifications to the design and specifications set forth in
Exhibit A shall be approved solely by Seller, and subject to the consent of the City of Tigard.
d. Closing shall proceed without the actual construction of the sewer line.
Construction of the sewer line shall be completed on or before
e. The signature of Seller shall be required to disburse funds from this escrow
holdback. If the contractor constructing the sewer lines so requires, interim disbursement of funds
shall be allowed prior to completion of the project.
f. No disbursement of funds from this escrow holdback shall be allowed for any
purpose except the design and construction of the sewer line contemplated herein, the pump required
as part of the system, expenses for street renovation and reconstruction and utility relocation, if
required, in connection with the construction of the sewer line and the cost of any permits or fees
required in connection with this project.
g. Upon completion of the construction project and its acceptance by the City
of Tigard, any funds remaining in the escrow holdback shall be promptly disbursed to Seller, and
Buyer shall have no claim whatsoever, at any time, to any of the funds in the escrow holdback.
h. The parties understand that the City of Tigard may require that a non-
remonstration agreement be signed by Buyer and Seller in order to approve the sewer connection .
Buyer and Seller both agree to sign such an agreement.
Mark Craig, Seller Paul P Rhee, Buyer
Dated' Dated:
Soo Nam Rhee, Buyer
Dated:
•
August 19, 1997
X11
Mr. Dan Holz CITY OF TIGARD
John L. Scott Realty
10260 SW Greenburg Rd., Suite 250 OREGON
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: 11570 SW 69TH AVENUE
The potential buyer of this property had a pre-application meeting with Associate Planner
Julia Hajduk regarding a Site Development Review (SDR) for a change of use from
residential to retail or dental office. At that meeting, she informed the buyer that there would
be certain conditions associated with the SDR. One of those conditions applies to
connecting the property to the City sanitary sewer.
In response to your request, this letter is to clarify that the Tigard City Council has agreed to
accept payment in lieu of sewer construction at this time. The in-lieu-of payment will satisfy
the condition of connecting to the sewer until is available in the future. The amount of this
payment will be based upon engineering estimates acceptable to the City Engineer.
Provided that the septic tank on this parcel has been approved and certified by Washington
County, the new property owner will not have to connect to the sanitary sewer prior to
occupancy of the changed use.
Please be aware that this payment will only satisfy one of the conditions of the SDR. If
there are other conditions as a result of the SDR, they must be satisfied prior to
occupancy of the building. Please refer to the attached pre-application notes as a guide
for potential SDR conditions. As of today, the City has not yet received a formal application
for a Site Development Review on this property. It takes approximately 5-6 weeks to process
the SDR once the formal application has been received and deemed complete.
Sincerely, r _,
71,
James N.P. Hendryx
Director of Community Development
Enclosure
C: Land Use file
Henry Lee, Century 21 Realty
Paul Rhee
Mark Craig
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING.RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:
: ,;. City of Tigard..
fir.. Planning Divisioa • • ' .
• •• ,. • 13125 SW HaIl Boulevard RE
Tigard.OR 97223 CEivED PLANNING
SEP 2 6 1997
„ B./ ( I�-c I Cny of TIGA
hykn, � , do a' mi that I am (represent) the party initiating in in a roposed / / _, i- >✓4 a affecting the land
located at (state the approximat locations) if no address( ) and/or tax lot(s) currently
registered) ( l t i� �' 6 I ss . G ` z 1 , and
did on the c Lh day of . er��t-r
19277._pe onally post notice indicatin1that the site may be proposed for a
La f for �v, s application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood
meeting to discuss the proposal.
The sign was posted at +" �) ! try", Ge 7z-�-�
(state location you posted notice on property)
Sig -tu - rn the presence of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBUC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
Th
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the d S day of Fln � , 191)
OFFICIAL SEAL
\r-\\1/4_
Ir1.
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
COMMISSION NO.049987
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.02,zoo° My Commission Expires: . `;� . a o o
(a�oucr nt. pie ise cczelete i.n.orrnation below for proper placement with proposed project)
rrAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: - [
I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
dame of?.ppLicanriOwaer.
!Name
or C-eneral Location of Subject Properrr.
LSubject?_ooerty Tai Map(s)and Lot�(s): j
M*qmV alrYVr astenuxf pascrst
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
)ss.
City of Tigard )
bra ,
I, 'POW"? Pyatnjts( ) 'h"' , being duly y s wam, depose
and say that on 972 S (7 7 , 19 , I caused to have mailed to each
of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed
development at (or near)
I I C-70 ct4 g - L` rJ(i ze( <iZ ( y 1z 2 5
a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said
persons and were deposited on the date indicat above in the United States Post
Office located at L f e T YD
with postage prepaid there6n. '
Signatu = ( n the presence of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
Subscribed and swomlarmed before me on the , S
f day of -e,vri taR1V' , 199
! ' OFFICIAL SEAL \ 4�
'`�''�. ' MARY Y E.HAWKIAia
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
`,. COMMISSION NO.049987
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.02,2000 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires:
(Applicant. Tease complete information below for proper placement with proposed project)
r`A-ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA3tE: -�
TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
Name of a..pplicancOwner
Add-ess or C-eaeral Locancn of Subject?roper-.T. _
Suojec?:..-per.Ty Tax_Maps) and Lac 3t(s):
/.,
Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address Phone
R0285925 MARRS CORDELIA W *NO SITE ADDRESS* 620-5455
R0285934 MARRS CORDELIA W *NO SITE ADDRESS* 620-5455
R0285943 CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY *NO SITE ADDRESS*
R0285961 CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY *NO SITE ADDRESS*
R0285989 CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY *NO SITE ADDRESS*
R0285998 COON JOHN CARL *NO SITE ADDRESS*
R0286023 POLLOCK DONALD E & JU *NO SITE ADDRESS* 292-4373
R0286069 POLLOCK DONALD E *NO SITE ADDRESS* 292-4373
R0286103 MOORE GLENN L & SHARO *NO SITE ADDRESS* 639-8563
R0286158 LARSON IRVING L & JEN *NO SITE ADDRESS*
R0285890 BYLES JACQUELINE F 6860 SW ATLANTA ST 684-8055
R0286078 SMITH DEAN W 11705 SW 68TH AVE
R0286167 LARSON IRVING L & JEN 11725 SW 68TH AVE
R0285907 CRAIG MARK EDWARD & S ' 11570 SW 69TH AVE 538-4137
R0285916 TIGARD TRIANGLE PROPE 11600 SW 69TH AVE
R0286096 MOORE GLENN L & SHARO 11710 SW 69TH AVE 639-8563
R0286112 KATAFIAS JAN 11750 SW 69TH AVE
R0286050 STERNBERG WILLIAM H 11755 SW 69TH AVE 244-4851
R0286121 DARN WILLIAM J 11770 SW 69TH AVE
R0286041 CARPENTER RICHARD L 11795 SW 69TH AVE
R0286149 BAURER ELDON F ESTATE 11800 SW 69TH AVE 639-1491
R0285952 HARRIS FRED L HARRIS 11540 SW 70TH AVE 620-6755
R0286032 POLLOCK DONALD E 11762 SW 70TH AVE 292-4373
R0286087 MILLER LAVIDA E 6870 SW BAYLOR ST
R0286005 COON JOHN CARL 6940 SW BAYLOR ST
R0285970 LAW JOHN C BILLIE J 6945 SW BAYLOR ST
R0286014 WAGAR PAUL B JR 6980 SW BAYLOR ST 292-5328
R0286130 DARN JOHN C & MIRIAM 6835 SW CLINTON ST
R0285881 VINCENT BRADFORD 6830 SW HAINES RD
The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed.
= M E T R O - C A N P R O P E R T Y R P O R T =
Washington (OR) County
*****************************************
* Date: 09/24/97
* Time: 11:33 : 19
* Report Type: Single Line *
* Sort Type: Site Address
* Target Properties Selected: 29
*****************************************
*********************
* SEARCH PARAMETERS *
*********************
*********************************************************************
* ITEMS SELECTED INDEX USED
*********************************************************************
*
* WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS Subdivision/Plat
*********************************************************************
Page 1
Mark & Samuel Craig
J Patsy
18505 NE Bryan Creek Rd September 25, 1997
Newberg OR 97132
RE: Dental Laboratory
Dear Interested Party:
I, Paul Rhee, owner of Ceramics West the property located 11570 SW 69th, Tigard,
Oregon 97223. I am considering proposing a site development review at this location.
Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss
the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are
invited to attend a meeting on:
October 9, 1997
6:00 pm
Red Rock Conference Room
Tigard City Hall
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans
may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City.
I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at
503/636-2631 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Paul Rhee
Owner
Oc-4 t
( P 0,1 ,Q6c
NK,G1t, 1?-v-&--e( K/Lt Aru-ga,tAn.yi ewp
cam,, G s Yes),stircce-4
r?aV/Iki IA ) trt
G
I
-t cerk adertJic_;-17vA
v-ra v41 ki (1.4- (--kiF-ttg 0 ci€._L
Attu- 11 b1,-0‘,�h
C4 it,o; (>0 (2-4kci t Foul (42 kio
IAA- n rIA-A
c
e
� 1
- - ` --. -
•
L - - CITY OF TIGARD
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTIFICATION PROCESS
1.) Neighbcrheodmeeting/notification is reeuired for the fallowing aAplications:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendments
a Zone Changes
D Subdivisions
A Sensitive Lands
D Conditional Uses and;
A Site Development Review.
2.) Accl cant makes arrangements for neighborhood meeting,
A Applicants choice of date (using staff guidelines).
D Applicant schedules a meeting facility.
3.) Acciiicart prepares a letter regarding the upcgjning meeting to be held with the neighborhood.
• Letter briefly describes the development, location and sets the date, time and place for meeting.
a NOTE; Meeting date to be within 2-4 weeks of the date the letter is sent_
D Two (2) weeks minimum noti ce must be provided to the neighborhood property owners within
250 feet p.(ys the CIT contacts!
4.) Applicant mails letter of meeting.
• Applicant acquires list of affected property owner(s) from available sources.
> Applicant gets list of Community Involvement Team (CiT) contacts from the City Planning Department.
3.) A • i _-(1 • - •.. - -f..vi •f a-.i • •n f.ui •vi•�. • ' - g- • - -.. . -- '•n u i •
3.) Applicant posts site and on the same day. letter of meeting is mailed to affected property owners,
a Sign must be posted at a location easily observable from a public right-of-way.
• Sign nail state that site may be under consideration for a land use application-and indude
a phoi.e number where the applicant can be reached for additional information or comments.
7.) Aoclicant prepares affidavit of costing on the form provided by the City at the pre-application meeting.
3.) Acoiicant holds meeting for neichboncocd as creviously scheduled.
Applicant presents their proposal, including City requirements and answers any questions.
n Applicant makes note of the names and addresses of all individuals who speak at the
meeting and provides documentation of their comments, concerns or issues.
?.} Acclic ant modifies preliminary proposal if desired following the neighborhood meeting to take into
consideration recommendations. concerns or issues which could delay the applications approval process.
10.) A. li«:n m• 4h-ir r. • _ • h- i far r-vi-w _ em•_ i-i• • - fel •wi • - -n • m-n
a A copy of the letter mailed to the affected property owners in regard to the meeting along with
a copy of the mailing list and the corresponding affidavit of mailing the meeting letter/notice.
D A copy of the sicn-up sheet(s) from the meeting(s) held with interested citizens/affected
property owner(s) on the land use proposal. h:lo tri‘pai:/tmasters'ctnctr`.mst
wit Ct
4J1 . / o / x' /97
'WI4. H dam(
C -7 ek_.
dvifim-t-tce_
� d
c 'AfL t cof
dot t 'Q ss A a n r/as
Y- 6 Y
ft/; (RD s w Few
//SSv sw 7 oL ? / 0-4 ?72a 3
Sa3
//s- i /w -72 •
t57a' ots 2
-tag/ ?-14-( --r
atit ride€C rgzetx5--
4-10 C6-e-G rYt- •bv0 a Chi ZC jyJ.GG �n
�, f [le
A(7u
� - dox a
7 . � '
OM
BENGE Proposal Contract No.
CONSTRUCTION CO. and
P.O.Box 886 Contract
Tualatin,OR 97062
(503)222.4047 •FAX(503)682-3777
Paul Rhee Date 10-7-97
11970 SW 69th Ave. Job Location 11570 SW 69th Ave. .. Tigard
Tigard, OR 97'?73 Property Owner Paul Rhee
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Unit Price Total
1) Prep lot for rocking $0.32/SF $996.06
2) Crushed base rock (2") $32.60/Ton $1,695.00
3) Pave 2" C-mix $85.91/Ton $3,866.02
4) Curbing (50') and striping (72') LS $ 464.00
$7,021.08
Qualifications:
Prepping, rocking and paving based on
3,300 SF. Work to be scheduled not prior
to Dec. 1, 1997. No traffic control or
saw cuts. Bid based on one move-in and
is for onsite work only.
Unless specifically stated otherwise above,the Work does not include permits,fees,assessments,soils or materials testing,surveying,geotechnical services,
civil engineering, or work related to contaminated soils.
CONTRACT PRICE: Unless specifically stated otherwise in this Contract, unit prices will be applied to actual quantities of Work performed,
where such actual quantities exceed the estimated quantities,and the Contract Price will be adjusted accordingly.The Contract Price does not include
sales tax. use tax, excise tax, business tax, or other similar taxes or duties. Customer shall pay all such taxes in addition to the Contract Price or,
alternatively, shall provide Benge Construction Co. with acceptable proof of tax exemption.
PAVIMENT TERMS:
THIS WRITTEN CONTRACT CONTAINS THE ENTIRE CONTRACT BETWEEN BENGE CONSTRUCTION CO. AND CUSTOMER, AND
NO.OTHER ORAL OR WRITTEN INDUCEMENT OR PROMISE HAS BEEN MADE TO OR EXTENDED FROM EITHER PARTY AS A
PART OF THIS CONTRACT. THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE CHANGED, AMENDED OR MODIFIED ONLY BY WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
SIGNED BY BENGE CONSTRUCTION CO.
BEpI� E�QItI T U ON CO.
Date: /z, —/3-97 By: /
ACCEPTANCE
Customer accepts this Proposal by returning this Contract,signed below,to Benge Construction Co. or by accepting any part of Benge Construction
Co.'s performance under this Contract. Upon acceptance, Customer agrees to be bound by this Contract and the Terms and Conditions printed
below and on the back of this Contract. If acceptance fails to occur within ten (10) days of the date above, this ontract shall be void unless
accepted by Benge Construction Co. ,,a r+u'
3 /, CUSTOMER :71ac.„<....r
ACCEPTANCE DATED: /� ` By:
Title: /'7GI//2&1 :,''+'
PRE -
APPLICATION
CONFERENCE
NOTES
, .
.. /
• • .A
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
.,44..%iiii APPLICATION
CITY OF TIOARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297
GENERALINFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH:
DATE OF PRE-APP.:
Property Address/Location(s): l�,r 7 � ii" OR STAFF USE Y
` x` 67(. or c? ) -2 7 F AF S ONL
Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s}. / S / 3 6 PA D /./ O tJ Case No.(s):
Other Case No.(s):
Site Size: / 0 , el )7 S 7p, Receipt No.:
2 Application Accepted By:
Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': 1Gt rk C Yd d Date:
Address: Phone: 514/3'7
City: Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete:
Applicant*: �"L � ). a e`e
// • Comp Plan/Zone Designation:
Address: Phone: L 3d 2 6 3
City: Zip:
CIT Area:
'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant
Rev.4/21/97 incurpinlmasterMsdra doc
must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)
must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this
form or submit a written authorization with this application.
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted:
❑ Application Form
The owners of record of the subject property request Site ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization
Development R=view approval to allow(please be specific):
❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed„------
�
_ ❑ Site/Plot Plan !8 Cop/e5 —
s /1,11::/-/ 1 e. (#of copies based on pre-app check list)
e n- -E7 ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2-x 11")
7 ❑ Applicants Statement /8 Ur'�
f (#of copies based on pre-app check list)
L^ ❑ Construction Cost Estimate c- -- - -
_,�/ - /„� `' I t` 00.■ 1 0 ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card
4.411,m_. (Oistnbuted/completed at application submittal)
�j
❑ Filing Fee (under 5100.000) $ 800.00
91 dt1 d (5100.000-5999.999) Si,600.00
5 (s1 million a over) $1,780.00
s c-7
I-ss i slo.000)
`----1-a4 %-”"2.7,zoo
_ist any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as
'art of this application:
I2enL _
kPPL1CANTS:
o consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
lescribed on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box.
Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
'HE APPUCANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
The above request does not violate any deesi restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject
property.
If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all
the conditions and limitations of the approval.
Ail of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;
and the applicants so acknowledge that any perrnit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that
any such statements are false.
The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the
requirements for approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this day of , 19_
00'1191
?wmer's Signature "� Owner's Signature -pa ��
e�
)wner's Signature Owner's Signature 44 phee
• ,a
2
i i :: ....... ,.. •. :` •. , A y ,y { w 't'�f--�• •Sh r •y, .f ..+"';_ire,° �."'yrt`l�.t f. • ':.'(;:"�.' �,'�r ',� .
•� ;i;e•. .'f° .,-, .. .. ".'�`. �:�%��� X„�e�—�` ."` t' '�^ n..'",�''�. qty;;��, '•', ..y�:•+.,� :�!!i :�. ;r;?�G ,
.,;k,��..21.A....: .1,. .. '!.t'. � 'r'.., •±, a 3t`�•cr� •-t -i� n, '�'. .S" :.q���
."''' :!t. t•^rF . 'r:.i-••y . • ) •,_ `i 11,:,' .;ry T: 's' .n'tz '"•'7`• .-• t .2..n.:
-. Yi;. "4+ ••.f`, r �V;. .f,� 4,'t., :,7,..".%S.',1, 'C. trl i.xna•-,,; .:,; '_"a .f,,4,14'.: '..1 'f' `'�+ _ �'�4
s. t . ..j„ ''• •S f� T�...1 .,y 4:! ..1 <4'''i''. J,.• ' � f+ .7. �''.°�• .. �i• w �, �,,,{ - .4 }
..�..�:+r'L• '..b•" h Y .a1.'L'k••= ..t^ � : e,, \`S r : K r r,.,� Ty 'rc r . f, .•• •y•• _, !S'1•`MSO ' o GS TO�lEME �, .:T, € ,�.�. : ,,•MBE ;'. ! , ., _,, ,,_ { .�,�y .�,., . •.•
•..: r ..=?•ti a".. _ . ;•" .. f` .s '.-":4, . r'J)ti [,_ Evl- t- 'iw �' '. .. C�il Yli V !•'c• .�,. i .1�. T% ;,tr .'..•C "1 . b5 ia' Y� e +
period of one '- : ▪`
Approval'is good for a p e ,, ' r,,,, t x. ..:•E;: , .�.... s Y. Development _ #.
and one half a F �' , M1 w•.
years from the effec- i '', t • . �.' Department f '
tive date of approval:' •Upon:written °_`: . `_: ,▪ . . � ,V :' .`.aF.:.., '. _�� .A
request and meeting.' certain or- - t.... "A;;....4., ', .•rh,E;,"' �:/;%.,,,. Yi s:.. � t,• . . . • •
clinance rovisions :a�n �, <•.,_� _.,,,4,,,,,...,,,,,,,,,,k.„ ,',, , ' w•: ,.,„,....4..' :-;
P 'extension of • ,_ _ � . r, ,, . =r.,� x.,_ {:': , ;�:a.
t . . .. k' :. _;; ::•7'-`. SITU
the approval not.to'exceed one year R ��,i 1 t .;x,. , :�r :, jj :,, , x.F ', ;: ,+�.`r'.:.'
can be granted.' •' . '•�,.`;` � ` + � --' ti ''•
1 '�..,:.•:. ' •'Y.;pc.i.;..},� �`�-„.�•. .f a'�'
`= v,:-, - '.: l., ; - - �- t'on Bulletin
.•;. . .; .�:.: •,..,' :.xr.., f: Informs i•
••• 11., tixr.g rf7r' ti 1 r.+ _. ''''?:Y T' _ r., .
•
. • • rd �..y,, r1f °,, :4..'.;;I:;,,,.'
�. #4 r i'� tiS r
yf:Yy,.v vR t '`s "!'fi„�• 3� r �.r'f ;SyJ�..I.,r ,�,fk 'f. .1 ;!, Z,
•
• .{.p.ry^ ro .. f ;:,e 'Ak .14.$'s 4.•ii4Z. 27..i t'./,2#`3.,1.' _ WHAT ISA-SITE--;. ...,.....,...,-,. .,,..,,,,,w.,r•.t,Y ., ',••
r M' DEVELOPMENT .
`�� �� ., k ' �;� i'Or. 4: NT REVIE�?'V'I: � v
• i; t,.,.. �• i,%� hy�rx i .b ,4C,'!• ,.0.,:}”. r Site • --• p.;
• ` n"; y it 'sue �`'' ` '': a Develo ment Review i
y t ,� ' f � F t Development is`an�d ',"
• '- I :�• = - ; ;. 4 1...
f.;� , �� . .., ministrative site plan review of,�J `r.T w'..'3r development roj ects .. to e `=f
', ', p o en,
.. Development.-
• }r - 11,-:.4....,-....1.-r. `� � hr'.t '' met by the development. It'i .,.•'r . Y •u R' ',aC ix'.1'. s v
. k ,;;` ,i "v L`k ,; rs; r me • $,a. ,.1,:"•
i. • -„ • ., -: e�• x i , -�V't''k 5 , i used to ensure compliance nth =
' '�f -.�i needs, the City- =�
• . '• ;� t tr' r public y s
• m, „ .`.: x, r K ublic facilit n e City
.t R 3r= d."- � : , ..1 :;. _ prehensive Plan and compatibility'"`''t.`••„4' '"'' • with .
. M x., ., r 4: ;ws ,rf f the natural environment Site••. �. • •.'” i ;1 { ,, - ` `' .. ..�.•. =,.4`. Development Review is apphc ible F•
' + =. . . ; f i:� ��:; •M' --�,- -"'` to all new development projects and t4
;,� 4 t ' ,� �• .r" '+' , • .'.;' ' major modifications of exis . �.
�� ,� tiny `•z;:'• :, .; i .4L:tK Y. • �'c` z.;'J,: , ,'-.• development. Site Development; - - •
, :, ti � ak ` ? � y ::," Review, however, does not apply to'..z.--
,�w;�,. y � : ` '" Ft_ :r :' .- single 'family' detached dwellings,
- �}, ",.. d homes dual
' d '` .; _ ; :. man acture h om individual
-
. �r y lots, duplexes, approved conditional
4,-1,C,..• "—''Y `J .:. 13"-a 0 :r i 6 i lot
:.f,': �,.. ;�;;,,t,�{.� -,• .r'r ow:,.,, ..; uses, mobile home parks and ,sub-
•
,..•- 4 :;3•.--""ter'"k�: ,,x-•• -•_f-v-t,•• ?. �;ii.; divisions, family day r;;
,-� .,;« care, home oc- • .,-
• : : !(,. ,�•` ._ 'k • 1=4,.,..1.P,"&,.,-4.',a< ,: sx cupations, temporary uses, fuel_= N ...•i ;• + s and-accessory structures...•
y ( r' q tallii ,..
t � ,ff :E �14,.,E ,<. „ • >f . urea.,;..ir
• .. • _,'•:� •'S Cr. i,'• . k .�'.t!'F' �(`�p 1n+j i. 4,42 N yx` ��A_'•; ' •.lam . .- #F� f '
,. ;C '-!'.7• F.a'HX• . ,V..,i, t ,'., tt .„:y5.: t 4d; •;,:':'t - zw-... ,a. '� • 7 1�'•. . r ,---J w L!+' i.
• • ` r ,+. .. �'Z.;•,3.3.?. . .. , '.....'” f',..• n:7'`.1'r 'r�•.;"ty Yi_:.' .'f.•
ow DO I Amity?. •P ?+��j},. ,,-,. _ ,. µ. -
H p. {, j ry c° ','• ,- ,,a- i,7 r t,'~s l r�F',r•`'_ : ;:streets utilities;'buffering, par i ' `t• ,
,, r c k•fig►
a,•,• ? ``fin ;.1ii ai ',Jij,,r-+,`y` Y" ii- °�'r 4o F;' ,Ya.... transit, drainage others.
:;:*�• rr ��; ��� �"F ���� k,�*� �,_.�� ��- and •
PreaRgl = '` w , r'' �' :14 'lle• • ff...• Copies .of the proposed plans
1. Attend A ication Con- • : ';' . ,,, ,.. , , '. p ans are .
erenc •_ •_-: F'' ' 'rmsfadp'P. •�e- - . .=referent;`. distributed' to the City Building
f e. Prospective applicants �: .,, y, - *� •must participate a preap- °•'Velta � io ) :' Division and Engineering Depart-
must in p p- a= ,�, <'. ,, r. - :• A, i. ,77.,,,-........:?'
placation conference with staff 4',6-0;-*`'E , cis ~' n'diti , ment as well as other potentially
::;��;�'' '•;"•' •-� '�•.:•> affecteda encies:
prior to submitting a develop- '. • . ' ' „i''!"?" ,': #:;'.,-� • • •
ment plan. This is an informal Y.' �' ir ',See ' ' :” e 4' 0 DIRECTOR'S DECISION
meeting where the applicant ..z '`° ---.•:',:
. _sr I. 8 eve o p►ment-Plan,
and staff will discuss applicable 's∎`" rt - Based on the information obtained,
rules and,regulations as well - -, `°;- '`' � ` *-:.. . :,;- • ,. Y applicable provisions of the Coin-
as` , #zk - _ s e Plan, Developmen
opportunities and constraints: '• • ,' _ `' prehen iv p
elate to the site. - .` = 0 `I' 04X00• M Code and adequacy of public
which may relate x=�� ��,���,.��;:} � � -�, ;,'.� -:. :; `'��,• .�,�.-
;.`•�, . Architec ovations of m facilities, the Community Develop-:-;.'
2. Complete and Submit an Ap , ",,..i' ''all-st uct ` ", ment Director will make a-decision `=
•.�', .9�. �"�. �: ,, c lion• -
plication:` An 'application form ' , , :�;.; .,fr3• ;:Section=18. 20:140 to approve, approve with conditions.''.;
and notes providing information : • •;•"'' • ' - • - •
Ormatl0n ▪ „;'°r»„ Ca-.. ! �;
which the •; •=%•,','': amide or deny the preliminary plan for,
e applicant must ad- S. >w"'..5-' ' the
, ;A:..?::,':i u on, g; partition. Notice of the decision''
dress are provided at the preap-
:- r { = ��:50 �'
P P P- • ...: � s, will be mailed to the applicant,
placation conference. '
o erence. It is the '�°�`�`��°''��Si '�rawi - r= ```• •
gn, F Aga',• . . owners of the property, property.
applicant's responsibility to . '°�; ,...- 'Sectio "I, 1� `. G f
appli s onaibili -''':,y. :� n' �° 0° ,:.. =;:... •; ,; , � .. -.
P Y �'���` .� �. �'•:::� ,.:� feet of ,.
complete these :r"•`.�,,';" " ' �°;' ' ;fir:,.r: owners within 250 they;'
se submission re- .,: ,',� -; ,::,/< r ;.. :. . •H �- r.
complete se to r • 'ti ; fA copY of al ns;:and" ; . property, the affected neighborhood -
prior staff begin- ,'�;;; ` .gip "r . .t strictions�or organization and applicable govern---r`opns ni :,�, g
nin their i ,r .. -
r..-:.,,F,k- •;• ts:,. a •. p.- �.= _ ment agencies.
approval can be analysis whether .s .;;� ,;y�, 3COWe11�II ;� f � ���, ,•_ ;., es. Notice is `al
PP granted. . :, ,;;�; , :.. ,�'.: ,, ti;tom;,.:;: ...: ;41, so: :.
N-�: ;; og1 - posted at City Hall and published`-
ea-of tne'- • ormation P y
3. Submission Requirements. The =•••;� i ' e y.F F F, '`- ''Y • in a local newspaper a minimum of.---
Q ;are. ,a ands le •' the min-
completed application form •, ,°3 :'w{ �munity'.j. a "' `. • . e :Depart- . ' 10 days prior to the decision becoir
must be r : , :;,: r • �• ing final. If n
accompanied by copies „�tnent:�� ��„1,'•_..„.",e-,,,4,-• ,-..� o appeal is ':fileo
of the proposed development: . '4$-'±I �,"`' '•` "=; `; '” `'�"• ; ' r within the 10 day period, the
plan, necessary data, and a nar- -,.•H r' : ' r �` . " ' ;.. ' decision becomes final. ,•
rative to explain how the • •_. .'�;`r"� .; _+:-;.'': ° G,':r, 2, „ ittals are ' -
_ SITE DEVELOPMENT '
developmment.conforms to the ape'• _ -_ ;� ` °Community REVIEW
'_- • - '�''' = FEE: Varies by Project Value
placable development regula- • - i�a,- s F F, ' '•ki _ ., • s :des- nee.' -
tions. The site plan must. be' •'` ` ,,,,f,” f r'",r",y�; at,�,,� .4.r { "r compliance•
drawn on sheets not exceeding , ' ' ' ,:�- fi',11j''''6° Ali; s >' 1,; "t require-
18 inches by 24 inches using an i c F)•
"J,ti, r,} 7 f: ce>.wit 'ap T:: - =
engineering scale. - Structural ,t , 1;.-` F_3.i ,x, concerning
elevations shall be a standard :..rr -i. = � " :
d ,� ° i�r:; , ; �: �r� t: L.; -' access, ,. l;•
:.;4:,r u'r•.4."'S.-:;'..?Z- :I •. t 1'''' r ,*,,,.31 ot tfr' ia..'k ,.!':•2 ` • • y,. .i s r,a•
' ``• �' {. ; _ ,..... 4'"Y'I r. 4`L t ,+l!s ai 4_•-, •' 'tir' ' • :-"irk.` �1.i'
r '.fir-R-:• r"'� ' •". 1 Y' r.. • S ]} f• �S[4- �. }3 , {.rt . . . .r•,4%»y .� '•.r-•
/r V y. S
r 4 .r 't• f� ...*--•-e'. 'a •f� •.s•�/1r r• ` Y"_ri+4.`.5yp . _ • . ;. f Ve
•. 'mot, � :,"Mr• � �!..
•.7
08/19/1997 14:48 5032934300 JOHN L SCOTT PAGE 02
• 08/19/97 11:30 1 '503 7197 CITY OF TIGARD 4g002/00Z
August 19, 1997
(-77 414'
Mr. Dan Holz CITY OF TIGARD•
John L. Scott Realty OREGON
10260 SW Greenburg Rd., Suite 250
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: 11570 SW 69TH AVENUE
The potential buyer of this property had a pre-application meeting with Associate Planner
Julia Hajduk regarding a Site Development Review (SDR) for a change of use from
residential to retell or dental office. At that meeting, she informed the buyer that there would
be certain conditions associated with the SDR. One of those conditions applies to
connecting the property to the City sanitary sewer.
In response to your request, this letter is to clarify that the Tigard City Council has agreed to
accept payment in lieu of sewer construction at this time. The in-lieu-of payment will satisfy
the condition of connecting to the sewer until is available in the future. The amount of this
payment will be based upon engineering estimates acceptable to the City Engineer.
Provided that the septic tank on this parcel has been approved and certified by Washington
County, the new property owner will not have to connect to the sanitary sewer prior to
occupancy of the changed use.
•
Please be aware that this payment will only satisfy one of the conditions of the SDR. If
there are other conditions as a result of the SOR, they must be satisfied prior to
occupancy of the building. Please refer to the attached pre-application notes as a guide
for potential SDR conditions. As of today. the City has not yet received a formal application
for a Site Development Review on this property. It takes approximately 5-6 weeks to process
the SDR once the formal application has been received and deemed complete,
Sincerely,
James N.P. Hendryx
Director of Community Development
Enclosure
C. Land Use file
Henry Lee, Century 21 Realty
Paul Rho,.
Mark Craig
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(603)684-2772 - -
•
CITY OFTICARD �!
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES n,,,m,/ut H�tt.rtrGpmrrc
p (, nmurttrr
NON-RESIDENTIAL
iCATE —9?
sra>=F. TH/B 2
APPLICANT: £'/,4ee AGENT:
Phone:[ ] 634-261
Phone: [ I
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS: /45-7o Sc./ 69M
TAX MAP/FAX LOT: is/ 36 DD 7Z//Co
NECESSARY APPLICATION'S]: .5-le eve/
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: exi$/ Cwe% 11,74//
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: (/Vl ikeG>'' ((<0
ZONING DESIGNATION: /14u
'CIT1ZEH INVOLVL\ EHT ��5�` '
FACILITATOR: Se� C S
,!TEAM AREA PHONE: (503]
LING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Minimum lot size: — sq. ft. Average lot width: So ft. Maximum building height: yS ft.
lacks: Front P' ft. Side ft. Rear Q' ft. Corner f0- ft. from street.
Maximum site coverage: 25 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /S %
[Refer to Code Section 18.62_ oso] ;�� 5-4//40/ exciee d yo
. DITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless ijt is created through the minor land partition process. Lots
created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot
wide access easement.
The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2�- times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1
imes the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots]
'e-floolicatfon Conference Notes Page 1 of 3
ttIou/Tlualoi DioHrtmut Stctloo
SPECIAL SETBACKS
• Streets: 4 feet from the centerline of .
• Established areas: feet from .
Lower intensity zones: !/l feet. along the site's boundary.
• Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback.
[Refer to Code Section and 18.961
SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS
Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet
provided that:
• A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
• All actual building setbacks will be at least half (II:) of the building's height; and
▪ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district.
[Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201
. ARKING AND ACCE-S—S) /
"Required parking for this type of use: /.S qct fr P ire 47.4 -SO
Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): / r
Secondary use required parking:
Wm
Parking shown on preliminary plan(s):
No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces.
Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows:
Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet.
• Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet.
[Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201
Handicapped Parking:
• All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces,
The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall
dimensions. are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon
request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an
1 appropriate sign shall be posted.
\ Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be
located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall
Ibe provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces.
i Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 30 ' .
1 1
1 Minimum pavement width: .2c/
All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.
IDrive-in use queuing areas: 1`14 .
[Refer to Code Section 18.106'and 18.1081
;1TY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Motes Page 2 of 8
AOM-#esidestlsl soollcstlos/Plualog Department Sectles
EKWAY RE'UIREMEN
Tv- ' - ' a all extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs. ramps. or
elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required
access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building
commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed
. between a new development and neighboring developments.
(Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501
LOADING AREA RE r UI;
very commercial or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading
space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
(Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-0901
`'TEAR VISION AREA
The Ci requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at
road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area
depends upon the abutting street's functional classification.
(Refer to Code Section 18.1021
'7FFERING AND SCREENING
o ase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between
adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas
along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer
areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve
a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be
required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only
be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area
materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code.
(Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001
The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows:
21) feet along north boundary. 'L 0 feet along east boundary.
feet along south boundary. 14/Q feet along west boundary.
In addition, sight obscuring screening is requirip along
t-tu(s)1 Lk We"- j c W111-11 cNeaSS Sc free IA
LANDSCAPING e_a Sw - i 5 s s
-- trees are required for all developrtl �
s fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways
which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or
on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum
caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced
20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further
information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking
areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special
design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may
include the use of landscaped berms. decorative walls. and raised planters. For detailed information on
design requirements for parking areas and accesses.
[Refer to Code Chapters 18.10 0.18.106 and 18.1081
7 OF T1GARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
9-Is$l1uitlal loollatlIUrlauloI Department SocdoU
SIGN
Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign .
Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be
permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign
Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer.
[Refer to Code Section 18.1141
SENSITIVE LANDS
The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areae
within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or
on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application
conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive
lands areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of
sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application.
Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas.
Residential development is prohibited within floodplains.
[Refer to Code Section 18.841
STEEP SLOPES
When steep slopes exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotech ' - -:. ust be submitted which
addresses the approval standards of t,- '•. • _ - • Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The
report shall be •- - • e son geld exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendation
for . -ving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3.
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44
Purpose:
Land development adjacent t. sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor
for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area.
Design Criteria:
The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined
boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce
the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of 4
portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the
vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 1$
feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor
within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of
the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet.
Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor:
No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping o(
any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water
quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below:
A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved,
then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or
bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unlesg
approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize
disturbance to existing vegetation; and
Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the
approval of the Agency or City.
CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
NON-U•sidntlel appllcitln/PIeeole!e•e•rtio•et Section
L. cation of Vegetated Corridor:
In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such
as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract. and shall not be a part of any
parcel :o be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
(Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SWMI
IRE!REMOVAL PLAIT REQUIREME
tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided
for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,
major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is
preferred over removal where possible.
The tree plan shall include the following:
Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the City:
Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper.
Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the
following standards:
Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that
two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D:
Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 54
percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D:
Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no
mitigation;
Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect
trees during and after construction.
Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be
inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.0.
(Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251
Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines:
A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics.
If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the
Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value.
If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be
viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the
following formula:
The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size
of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement
trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may
require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either
public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property.
OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
,slisItltl tooliciUaa/PiI.uiIi oseartnsit S.ctls.
The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow
growth to maturity.
. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section. a party may, with the consent of the Director,
elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement.
[Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(Dl
SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION
Prior to submitting a Subdivision land use application with the City a •-- •, applicant's are required to
complete and file a subdivision plat naming request wi • -- .,-s ington County Surveyor's Office in order
to obtain approval/reservatio _aajr-stdry slon name. Applications will not be accepted as complete
until the Ci - s the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name
Rese Ion.
[County Surveyor's Office: 648-8884]
RAT1VE
e applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards.
Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application
incomplete and delay review of the proposal.
(Refer to Code Section 18.32]
CODE SECTIONS
18.80 18.92 ✓ 18.100 ✓ 18.108 i7-
18.120 ✓18.150
18.84 18.96 ✓18.102 ✓ 18.114 18.130 18.160
18.88 18.98 , 18.106 —18.116 _ 18.134 18.162
✓18.164
IMPACT STUDY: ,y�9.")d13
As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact stir
with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system.
including bikeways. the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system
and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of
the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users.
In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property
interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly
proportional to the projected impacts of the development.
[Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501
When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval
authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred
is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public.
[Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.250]
E16N HBORHOOD MEETINi
1 he a'1 p ]cant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the
members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing
date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site
posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application
will not be accepted.
[Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout]
-ITV OF TIGARD Pre-Mpllcatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
O$1ull�etll anlleIUIUFlIuleI O.psrtn..t Section
i11ILDIN6 PERM
s for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has
been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is
compliance with all conditions of development approval.
[CYCLING
plicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride
Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177.
(Refer to Code Section 10.1161
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
‘01:c-i2 /
Verl f 1-4�' 51/-4 LS �4L2 4 J 7o SQ,cr<i —731(.5l- /f, �1�1I�tJ d
e_d . , `�,�'.' (d cc ' .
a , are • qc C.CS� v: . . i - Cort rc vi •Crs. J
f70)-tIcy , a{ere ll Al') /-r �I tir� t * ' /s. � m ��A�1 w t}, !0
Glr•lf, 611 rh /'/ nor
JOCEDURE
Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation
on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City
Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development
Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped
off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be
accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days.
Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 1
8112" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or
administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted.
CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1018
MON-issids.Dal zYVUcau•e/Pluil■i o•grtm.it Section
The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will
determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the
applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an
application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written
recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A10, to 20
day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the
Tigard p/q/2,,, . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process ig
available from tY4 Planning Division upon request.
This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective
applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential
development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the
opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
PLEASE NOTE:
The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that
should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required
by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is
recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code
or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thin
pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following this
conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: ` J/,,9 yrr'd'1(---
CITY OF TIGAAD PLANNING DIVISION
PHONE: 1503)639-4171
FAX: 1503)684-7297
:UaglalpattY\aftert\pra apoiast
.ngleserleg Sectlaa:Mastan1Araa1M-c.aNl
:1-Mar-91
1TY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8
M i1,cIgsutial aeetleatlsuMantas S.eartateatSectles
IS\
too
City of Tigard, Oregon
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
ENGINEERING SECTION
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The purpose of the pre-application conference is to:
(1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions.
(2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns.
(3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the
final decision making authority shall be for the application.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of--
way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
1SSfe, is . (- t\"L .
( ) to feet fro centerline.
( ) , to eet from centerline.
(/) \ �' to feet from centerline.
Street improvements: Cv`� Arle. _ Lc5(-AL- 6,4LK,-r(UAL_ SIP- 'r
(`P) 1I2- street improvements will be necessary along Coct 4 l
( ) street improvements will be necessary along
i6 Street improvements on (s7O'h shall include 1-1 feet of pavement from
centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of
utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department),
a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5
Engineering Department Section
streets, or in the CE al Business District), necessary st, : signs and traffic control devices,
streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee.
( ) Street improvements on shall include feet of pavement from
centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of
utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department),
a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector
streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices,
streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee.
(1.) Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development
to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding
can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the
street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street
frontage that contains the overhead lines.
There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW (pct
AE . Prior to e)cw45,c-• , the applicant shall either place these
utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above.
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval
may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement
which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement
district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement:
(1.)
•
(2.)
Pedestrianways/bikeways:
Sanitary Sewers:
The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 461-W B inch line which is located in
( ,4L P - 2.- 5'c . The proposed development must be connected to a
public sanitary sewer.` It is the developer's responsibility to s--i >
Pg-a ft 5.r40.S4.1 Fr-A-1 —re, 4 sr-,..a.E. Q rj,c j-— AeAr-b-S,
CA_t lbc4-
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5
Engineering Department Section
Water Supply:
• The -aP• a V Water District - Phone:(503)2 27731 provides public water service in
the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire
protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information
regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to
fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed
to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a subbasin drainage analysis to ensure that
the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A
downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed
development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site.
lc�� DLL 1-15. Fe - b sl.aba■ p2"1-1Acle. 4,1 S /'(Z-tA• Rczii
c *. 9:> a...C> S-rc/Z-nn PwrJ Fr=e_ -rte ' (wit— (@ctl+Ev J J* AP PR- P -_.
Other Comments:
All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City
maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance
access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily
accessible.
° m
iti 1� -t0µD T. ¢F- .
STORM WATER QUALITY
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which
requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5
Engineering Department Section
65 percent of the phosphk ; contained in 100 percent of the, .arm water runoff generated from
newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant
to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will •
use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will
be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or
portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water
quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will
require:
(X) Construction of an on-site water quality facility.
( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu.
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than
$5,000.00.
PERMITS
Engineering Department Permits:
Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering
Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows:
Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way
or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to
main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee
must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of
permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit.
In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the
work.
Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility
line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all
grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be
submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost
of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to
issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance
bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will
obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement
construction work.
Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s),
the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is
responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted.
CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5
Engineering Department Section
NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required, the applicant must obtain that permit prior to
release of any permits from the Building Department.
Building Department Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Department. For a more
' detailed explanation of these permits, contact the Development Services Counter at 639-4171, ext.
304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation
excavation material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued
after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all
work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This
permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially
complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City.
For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a
mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing
that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information.
3RADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The
engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 2.0%, as
well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in
determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer
will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each
homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall
include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall
also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building.
PREPARED BY: (P 14(V
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Phone: (503) 639-4171
Fax: (503) 684-7297
h:\login\patty\preapp eng
(Master section:preapp-r.mst)
December 23, 1996
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page
Engineering Department Section
x / /
(CS IATUS ) 80-22549 �¢
HIATUS ,f
N89°54' 18..E 90-23065 \\T4 \4 •C 'VW/\-`\\\\\\\\}i\\\\-t\\\tt1\\\\T\\\
- \Q / / STREET °
ATLANTA, .47
3 88°=L;� W (PLAT) 799710 i 24 a 30
�° 9e 0 b a 100' 100' n F STA. 4(
so' d 100' _ 100' 3 I / 700 g / 200 — 100 '11 o= W
125' r
1500W o 1000 900 N 60 :1117 .29AC a 6.30 �Q .32 AC .47 N �az v
.55AC N N .224C. — .34.4C. _ / �� 801 io STA. ♦49.343 22 w ` �Z
23 K N 3 22 N o� 22AC 22 9o' eL _ .4 m °m I N
Z t _ F- 4 (C.S.21831) W N 4 2I � HvW o
22 N W N a 21 N _ v= o
5 20 N
r > 1 20 N 5 20 N Z N _ o / ...
N Q 1100 -� 6 3 W 6 N
20 N N .23 AC _2 19 N f 19 N N
.c._24______,C
" 7 1400 NI 18 N Q N 301 .06 AC. 600 N > w - STA.41+1
19 N 1 N _ -L 800 _1 .n w H f2'f' ii , tea, �55.0 17 N N 400 .06 AC. .44Ac. N 'i _ (t•I$ ti a 8 N 30' 30 �'�SS.OS T T Q
125 -r T + 7 r T I I r T p a
1 1 I 1 '—1 I I I r I
a 500 °
1700 1 1200 1300 +o �3T^ H'Sa+cc.00 ( = n X CO
./7AC. o o .23 AC- .16 AC. m W o 0 .23 AC. o I-
13 14 15 16 172 29 10 II 12 13 14 15 o Q 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16g 99 10 11 12 13 14 15 1691 W t
I ` W CC
//�. 66' �� . 25'1 25'1 25' 1 25' 25'125'125'1 25'b 30 125 125 125' 125 125' t 1 1 25' ! 1 1 1 2� 23' 23 25' 23' 25' 25' 1— +
11t1
BAYLOR STREETS Z
80-14553 z t-
25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 0 23'1 2.5' 1 25'7 25' 25'125'1 25'123'` r 1 25'118'101 251 2'11Gr13'' 2 25 25 25 25' 25 25 25' 25' 25' 80'
60' -3300 3301 3900 3800
) _12A 2700 2600 I- o .17 AC. 1.2/AC. o *ST A. 43
.12ACo $ .23 AC 34 AC. .29AC. ./6AC. o
5 6 7 8 9°- -1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89 1 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8°- -°1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8°- z o
0 °_
1 1 1
I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I t 1 1 . 1 1 - o0
38 N N °a 36 N N 4000 36 N 0
36 N 3402 CJ -� :
+ 37 II 2800 – 35<° N •68 AC. + 35 N .29AC. 35 N W: }STA.
N " + '�- a 2
36 N N 1 I 3290 N N 11 + 3700 N N 11 L+ 34 1 q
t 35 N g 2890 .06AC. .12 AC. 1 N N 12 ?3 AC. N 12 33 i
N �, N
n 13 + 32 N N 13 7 1-' 32 a
2500 N N 2900 3200 N N p . _ 100' i e p P.
/2 AC. w N .23 AC. -,—rt 22 AC. 14 * 31 N ~S N 4100 (D 31 N o +
o �.. 15 3600 a N .4/AC. .� N e
2400 N " 15 30 ♦„ r /2 AC. 16 29 N go
23 AC. N 0) N 16 29 Lt_ 17: CO . 16 I N L>l.1 -I
30 N1 N 3000 300 S, 17 3403 N 17 28
' it T/19
J
rPV-e — A (fpiileit,i:sv• 654eKe,
A epGZU,X (J . Rke-e. ,9"'• 63 � 2 �3
� I SD S . W. F3aarn¢s
1a�e let . � _ � 7DaS
- ftotei
C . Deitd—oti faY Den,+ tc ,
D , We6+ Pmt &rno( eci .
Q6clec 4-es 23
E. 0 f.t rre-4 Oc071-Pi(,
Mark C_ ey6c,‘ ,
F. Acs---f_e - A-secked Taitc/
V v CI '<�-1 a
64X
® ® e
gaa 3.2o0 _..
17 Ac . 2pav •
iqua
_ 1W T . ova
... t
. i 9 V
C
DtdGtc.ui1u o
1
rot y
for ong 4
W K(1MCt AAc
Dtnt - wAwc - -
11/m1%11-Pia- 1 \
30Q1
32 AkU
wASHINGTr 'OUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND F' 'N SERVICES
NVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SANITAT1
Phone: 648-8722 155 N. First Avenue
• CRS 07 /
t� Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 �1! / -7�
7 DATE OF INSPECTION (�
Date Rc'd 7-14, -17 APPLICATION FOR REPORT ON INDIVIDUAL
Required Fee 1119o .°.° SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ASSESSOR'S MAP NUMBER: Township /5 Range / Section -,J)J>Tax Lot 11
STREET ADDRESS OR //5-2 0 5, vJ 4,1 r- 4{/e— 7/( 4- ) 7L g 7 Z Z-3
ROUTE & BOX NUMBER City Zip Code
DIRECTIONS TO PROPERTY /7.0 / _ sT - �y� T ��or h,�,,,�
c u R R E x r (Y 1FER s NAME 144 444t C424-t - Phone GB¢-co u
ADDRESS t r 5`70 5(A) 0 E,c q7 ap,
PURCHASER'S NAME tJ Phone
ADDRESS
LENDING FIRM TO WHCM REPORT IS TO BE MAILED
ADDRESS
FOR SYSTEMS 5 YEARS OR OLDER, THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BE CCMPLETED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE
APPLICATION:
1) Provide a pumping receipt or an inspection report from a licensed pumper dated within the
last five years. The septic tank is required to be pimped out if that has not been done.
The top of the tank, baffles and inlet and outlet fittings (men accessible) shall also be
inspected. The septic tank may be inspected by the licensed pumper or by the Sanitarian.
Uncover the distribution box or top drop box. If more than first line is in use, uncover
the drop boxes also.
3) County file is to be attached, or if the Health Dept. does not have a record of the system,
attach a plot plan which includes the location of existing structures, driveways, wells
(including the neighbors) , property lines, location of septic tank and location and length
of the drainl ines.
(It may be necessary to uncover portions of drainlines and flag the ends of the lines.)
FOR SYSTEMS LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD:
1) Portions of the system may be required to be exposed.
(It is recommended that steel tanks older than 1 year be uncovered and inspected.)
HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:
TT IS THE OPINION OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT THAT THIS INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IS
FUNCTIONING SATISFACTORILY AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION AND UNDER CURRENT SEWAGE FLOW.
SOIL CONDITIONS:
THERE ARE INDICATIONS THAT THIS SYSTEM MAY NOT FUNCTION SATISFACTORILY DURING WINTER
MONTHS.
FURTHER RE CCMMENDATZONS: _
HOUSE WAS VAC ANT. SYSTEM NOT IN OPERATION. SYSTEM MAY BE EVALUATED AT A LATER DATE AFTER
DWELLING HAS BEEN OCCUPIED FOR 3 TO 6 MONTHS.
SEWAGE WAS DISCHARGING ON THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND. SYSTEM IS FAILING AND MUST BE REPAIRED.
***THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE THAT THE SEWAGE SYSTEM WILL 7'' I TO ION PROPERLY***
SE-1 t:�/ i ' a _
2/6/91 / PUBL1' HEAI•TH SANITARIAN
AALLPUMP
SANITATION
SERVICES NAME -y F=44. )( 7
14415 SE MILLPLAIN BLVD
SUITE 105-B-130 ADDRESS / 70 SW 6 g /4't/
VANCOUVER,WA 98684-6985
(360)892-3180 CITY t76 ) ST n ZIP 'Y 71 / 3
INSPECTION OF THE SUBSURFACE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM THE TANK WAS
UNCOVERED ( ),PUMPED ( ),INSPECTED( ),VISUAL INSPECTION ONLY ( )
SEPTIC TANK CESSPOOL ( ) OTHER ( )
�_ r/1cNT
TYPE: CCVLC/ SIZE: /C)0
LID(S): IN. BAFFLE: cs-(,c- OUT. BAFFLE: L w'ND +
TANK AND LID LO TION: ' /2� 5-7-44(4647- �T � xT rJ1
��.
//V L...� .r. CAAF-C �%` lam.
THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM APPEARS TO BE FUNCTIONING?: (_ Jim
YES( ) NO( )
TYPE: DRAINFIELD( ) DRYWELL LEACH PIT( ) OTHER ( )
MOUND ( ) SAND FILTER ( ) PUMP UP ( ) UNKNOWN ( )
•
•
X COMMENTS: 1,4 •:r.0 p � '' '•
-d)C uJ -2 0-0-E D//Y G 1-!/■ E S /
*-NOTE: IN ORDER TO PREVENT DRAIN SYSTEM FAILURE AND GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATION,A SEPTIC TANK SHOULD BE CLEANED EVERY (4-5)YEARS.
EVERY(2) YEARS IF THE HOME HAS A GARBAGE DISPOSAL UNIT OR IF THE
TANK HAS A CAPACITY OF LESS THEN 1000 GALLONS. OTHER SYSTEMS MAY
DIFFER,DEPENDING ON THE TYPE.WE DO NOT WARRANT THE SYSTEM
AGAINST FUTURE PROBLEMS OR FAILURES. r
—a20c� ( -
I RECOMMEND THE SEPTIC TANK BE CLEANED:
I HAVE VISUALLY INSPECTED THE ABOVE SYSTEM AND FIND IT:
APPEARS TO BE FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED
( ) NEEDS ATTENTION
LICENSE NUMBERS:
A - ,
CERTIFIED OPERATOR OREGON DEQ LICENSE #37192
- /S- °/ '7 WASHINGTON HEALTH DEPT.
DATE PUMPER NUMBER 2.3
• AALLPUMP
Sanitation Services
Dalko Corp.
14415 SE Mill Plain Ste. 1053-=130
Vancouver. WA 98684
(360) 892-3180 Port. (503) 285-5838
• 4e CUSTOMER'S ORDER NO. PHONE " - -' I GATE
6 �� _ ,,) -_ c -! _ '
NAME
,)- - is ,
ADDRESS
li 7o � ! �f
I. / 1:1 �^ .2 n
�M,7194 ✓ *.: `�- `''Y`!�..'++F M 1 7A.
f .- sj Sir•,��' 'Yr. 1 �"'1✓ ,J '0'1,---..-.. 4
f; QTY, DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT
r
` I
!- 6=44-"---';7'2( ..
i4,2?)
r
.
I
1 r. I
{
1
• I
I
I
NET 30 says A trance:harp 0 144%w,-ronth!1 rs NI
_...._____...._.._. i . Viz'Alba charpo an vnpacIliranc a :ailec'wn•ees _
will two aaessed 4 nerreasar. TAX }
RECEIVED w TOTAL ` 21c ��
All claims and returned goods
6181 MUST be accompanied by this bill. `Thank `You
1
7 -l(o194_' No. 2473
to RECEIVED FROM /(J rah!/L&44 , `'t'
°m /0249 ADDRESS lI S7O �'fTID((JQli/J ��GL�I, !ter /11.2.).3
2 DOLLARS S /" •1
45/ -3b00 -loo
FOR Zthael /,,,n
ACCOUNT HOW PAID .}--� E
AMT.Of I CASH I /
ACCOUNT 7� 1 �
AMT.PAID f T O J - CHECK ` Or-f r�/7�Q y/1 '
BAOIA
BALANCE I ORDER 1 BY / l`�"� r
_ ....
44bany 967.4006 r,- S. Auburn 833-1085 WO a DESTROYING
Jul revs 757-3566 ALPHA - Bremerton 478-0178
Eugene 484-0612 Everett 851-3965 SERVI. ..: SLIP / INVOICE
Grants Pass 474.6736 �5(cr �,77(/J) a ,,,t: Gig Harbor 851-3965
Lake Oswego 636-9468 '`-�+�4y'w.. 1< !����?=?<;::;p.. :::ygi;.:
� :<::�<;,<:..:} Olympia 754.3463 401,:, • - NO � .
1,le=tdrd 773-5403 The Earth Care People ar Seattle 623.9189
Of
Poikland 255-1440 Spokane 244-4516
Salem 588-9159 Boise 368-7823 Caldwell 454-2619 Tacoma 272-2124 Corporate Headquarters:
NOOdburn 981-2314 Coeur d'Alene 665-9505 Nampa 466-2833 Vancouver 694-4441 2700 NE Andresen, Suite D-30•Vancouver, WA 98661
SERVICE: Last Name Fi erne
/ / APPAHA� :':`z?'::.:• ::.::;,< .«:: : ��., :...QCABON
nJ».....r 4 1rH}?�i-r'•"•i>:!:'riTvi.•'i` er,.n %
Street �/5- '�) /5,r �.)zi DATE&TIME c'2-,9. j I �� ROUTE/GRID
;city , Stae TEG`1/! ,' /4•� c � OUMILEAG ' #// Phone n «c ;o,.x,<, }{
�P(/ �!%! )- (! /_�/y �/9 TREATMENT aatoenes FOR TARGET'd 1 :
C. C ��
BILLING NAME: O Subterranean Termites 0 Wood Boring Beetles 0 Wood Destroying Fungus
0 Dampwood Termites ! Carpenter Ants
IStreet
METHOD OF SITES=SITES CHEMICAL WAS I-I M I T E D INSPECTION
/ CATION(METHOD) APPLIED 6OR AREAS TED
:City State Zip ^gt-cracksoevice ,'17'K*cren 10. Utility Roan (Washington Residents Only)
�'SPCS(2 s.t or ) gin "12. t Verity,idenmy i Observed No Ev.denc.
;Home Phone Wk Phone vadreemy 4 eeanr„s �12 otnsea what_
i 'gar Spete Treatment(UL1) 5. Ding Room -T4. Crawl WW1 ---
EOex Appkaton 6. Den 15. Other Proposed treatment tar preventative po,pput onty SERVICE TYPE AMOUNT
97•Bating max 16. Garage Customer unmat-____
- .I�tlPfi1[M USED EQUIP) Al a 17. Oarca
(�_ O E.Cesstw Mdisture
GUARANTEE ❑ S Year ❑ 3 Year t Year / 9.Ce fr gwaY Junctions ctgns l e. storage
B-Aerosd Can O Do Not tooth Treated Areas IA Ory
ASST______,1 1110 2 M0_. a MO. 3 B MO. 1 YR. _. O Do Not Tamper with ROdtnGde Placements
Sprayer
No Guarantee 0 Retreat ❑ P/S H-Mao4resclor I O Do Not Return to Room lino!cater
fez• *:••••a•_ I-Bel Staddl
Per Addttlonat Treatment $UB TOTAL $ '1.�Is$�2�.d :'` : " : • 1
.. .:.. ::. ,::.::. v::.:nn..: .. i.d JP.J`vsr {v d . .. ..5..:..»..4..:..L • S . 1 ..y • 4 ;•
'7 Senior CI Previous Customer DISCOUNT ' : ' ` ' `'...~ .`.` y "`
C' "S}r}nc?X'^ 39r z:y 'r'y. .rr.Fj, X ,+• ;r: %rc,, ?r"'9', .. ._.. .. ..•• °X
,x a+n•''S
•{-:.,v�, ?:.;"'i� t$w. .'4•''': t.4. }JS
. •
TOTAL DUE $ i - . ;•
�/z •
-J CASH 7 CICI /' '0 BILL TOTAL$/ ' : ' . . .'••.•.••
PAID • • •: ;..:.., :P.O.. .4- : : . :
C.C.TYPE J HOLD C.Q.0 USE C.C./ : •
i
'NE ON CC EE..A.: ... - //!-a ._.......
.HEMICAL MFG&EPA REG k INGREDIENTS QTY SITE(S) METH EQUIP "' "" " . . ""'
FLEX FM-3112 Bfertrhm0.0i7p • • . . + .. .. .•
279.31 t 2 i ' .' , ° . . -
_ / ..i f : : .... - '... ..... .
nAGNET FT FMC Corp. 279-.7062 Pemrthrot 050 �•/� • : ll••
MBCR u s.Borax CRoodem Oetaborate /1/ �� 4 : :....::_...4....:.. ..".
162439 ;Tgehoesto a : : : ' -. � , o
: 10.0 els.099.0 •• ' 1 ' '
p.a
1 ULO BP-300 Mkro-cart Corp Wmthrine 3 CO • ' . - • • (. - • ! •
.4 • 4 ' ij
11540.1 Pb.ronyt 8uoerde 8 w :
7 :
N•Ocryt&tycbMptery : : : � '
dicareocme•1000 ..•.,. °"" . _
T-175 Wham.Late.Inc. Pyndwr 0.30 >. - . 4v
MICROCAPE 499.381 Piprotyl Sutoetde 2 20
N-Octy1 BtiYcIohew.rt. .. ._. ._.......
dicaAOemds D 336 ��`` :41(' � ..
PRO CCNTRCL IV Micro-Gen Corp. Pyndlnna 050 O (1t' r4,..,,L../".'(,,..(N CD'Ga ...Y" 4'f4..........
11540.24 Cy6uhm 0.10 al . ...........
PgerorM et
Butode I.00
CONQUER Paragon Estenveraie005 -
1021.1565.57076
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS DT = Dampwood Termites CH= Crawl Hole(Access)
_ ST=Subterranean Tennites BS = Batt Station WB=Wood Boring Beetles
TO BE COMPLETED WHEN SPRAYS ARE USED AS OUTDOOR APPLICATIONS: CA=Carpenter Ants WF= Wood Fungus MP=Moisture Problem
IA=Inaccessible Area
w NO DIRECTION WINO VELOCITY TEMPERATURE HUMIDITY
O Pre Construction Treatment O Pest Identiliration
O Post Construction Treatment O Wood-In-Place Treatment
COMMENTS
:r a i h �.. sga k` x vi• '' 'ci}i .C>J sv
*%. Yoh a J c ,t ..
5
:. S yb> > 5u'�'s�' y � *° rc 'kr : r'�?5.22� b An 3
s
q `0 ¢h rv. £. ;gii.:iPFk. e -rr } -r . 0 .. _3rr
: <' g.,.. x.F+a:..c }%r ,� a?Sf`J' r,, r .t...- / ,; v�4 dun .
.h ,oJ._ rz• �'� �0i'a:w a¢v f•r eat• d.R '� P b- c -:g .4:n 4 3r`9 d. r.J:::' < a S" n
srgneture- Jow indicates that I have read this entire document, understan mpletel .9 'o'o be bound by its t rms.
SIGNATURE OF CUSTOMER 13EEEIVING SERVICES TECHNICIAN SIGN AND PRINT NAME
ALP`■A 0103 3118/97 PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE
Invoice .amber 46636 •
Northeast 252-5693 DATE WORK METHOD OF PAYMENT
t Southeast 239-8801
`' e Westside 292-6591 77 ORDER
°_`. ti i.= Gresham 667-5797 S VICEMAN ` _ BILL ❑ CASH
Milwaukie 654-8026 ❑ CHECK#
DRAIN AND Lake Oswego 636-1276 CODE ❑ CR CARD
ROOTER SERVICE ' (360)895-0871 CUSTOMER P.O.NO. ❑ ON ACCT
2208 NW Birdsdale Ste#8 Fax 669-9568 COST ❑ NO CHARGE
Gresham,OR 97030-3544
ID#
BILL TO: JOB NAME: MACHINE USED
NAME NAME 0 81 ❑ AIR
o
11 0 100 ❑ MINI JET
ADDRESS ADDRESS/
.• - " :-.7.,-) _• - l._ ❑ 300 ❑ BIG JET
GrY ZIP CITY . ZIP
'' , C�,r. l_o, O 1065 ❑ CAMERA
PHONE PHONE
'.,'7,,r• '.-.'..1.-7 j 0 AUG. •❑ OTHER
0 BATH TUB 0 TOILET 0 UTILITY SINK 0 URINAL 0 MAIN LINE WARRANTY
0 BATH SINK 0 KITCHEN SINK 0 FLOOR DRAIN 0 GREASE TRAP 0 PARKING LOT DRAIN 0 YES p NO
0 SHOWER 0 LAUNDRY LINE 0 FLOOR SINK 0 RAIN DRAIN AteT fER� -v/„ . COVET RED
10-7 f`: 1 DESCRIPTION I 10-8 •,�,,,) • AMOUNT
_ ) - _
-. i- t- � L .'^ '`.. ~� / � 1 r\ , "= ,
s
. 1 . .•_. k- - -i':... ,,� `
C..
- / k �. __j - 7f/,; * ! - ,it
r
- •
/ i- �./. ��; f � ref �--
/ ' t i
/ ` f i -
/• r : . . if , r i • � . -
t ..J
•CUSTO$1ER•S AUTHORIZED AGENT'S SIGNATURE PLLASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE.
X I agree to pay a ten dollar service TOTAL
charge on all returned checks.
1
i
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Customer represents that all water and waste disposal systems are in good repair and condition and Company warrants its work to be free from defects in =Penal and workmanship for Sr.
agrees to hold APOLLO DRAIN&ROOTER harmless for the discovery of any of the following warranty period set forth on this invoice.All warranties are VOID if payment a not made wat•.,n
defective conditions: 30 days.Under our warranty Apollo is not responsible for the following:
1.Improper or faulty plumbing. 1.Defective conditions listed on the left.
2.Leaky or defective traps. 2.Defects and failures from mistreatment or neglect.
3.Hidden or unknown lead 0iping• 3.Defects and failures from intervening causes including,but not limited to.
4 Rusted or defective pipes. improvement causing heavy weight upon sewer sines and plantings growing
5.Corrosion or unusual restrictions due to minerals or hard water build up. into sewer lines.
5.Cleaning chemicals such as lye.sulfuric acrd.etc.(Additional charge to customer) 4.Removal of excess root penetrations which cannot be removed by typical sewer .
'.Lines which are settled.broken.detenorated.or damaged. cleaning equipment.but require special heavy equipment or replacing pipe.
S Detective roofing TERMS: NET 30 DAYS
APOLLO CRAIN 3 ROOTER is not responsible for the following: A FINANCE CHARGE will be computed on the
1.Damage caused by the removal of the clean out cap or drain cover.If in the opinion unpaid balance by a single periodic rate of 17 %
of company.clean out cap or cover is so rusted.broken or fastened as to require 2
replacement alter removal.If customer authonzes replacement 6 shall be made at per month, which is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE
an additional charge.
2.Toilets damaged dunng cleaning unless indicated on this invoice. RATE OF 18%.
( I IRTC)MFR COPY
Ph (503) 624-3631 • Fax 624-2938
WILLAMETTE
ELECTRIC
July 15, 1997
Sam Craig
11570 SW 69th
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: Service change
Dear Sam,
Wi ,.amette Electric is pleased to submit for your consideration,our proposal for the electrical
work at 11570 SW 691
Included in this proposal:
1. Furnish and install:
( 1 ) 200amp commercial meter main
b. ( 1 ) 200amp wire in owner supplied mast
c. ( 1 ) 200amp 25' feeder to owner supplied panel
2. Grounding of new service:
3. Reconnect existing circuits to new panel:
3. Electrical inspection and fees:
Total Quote: $ 1,850.00
Qualifications:
1. Any unforeseen code violations to be dealt with at time and materials.
Exclusions:
1. Cutting and patching
2. Fire alarm/smoke detectors
Please review this proposal and give me a call if you have any questions. We appreciate your
consideration of Willamette Electric and look forward to assisting you with this project.
Respectfully,
David Fife
P.O. Box 230547 • Tigard, Oregon 97281-0547
COMMERCIAL: Tenant Improvement•Design/Build•New/Remodel•Parldng Lot Lighting•INDUSTRIAL Equipment•Mown•Controls•Tracilake. tsese ° oieai Remodeling
RESIDENTIAL New& Remodel•New Circuits•All Phues of Maintenance & Repair•Apartments New& r,4n�
,
INSULATION CONTRACTING ,J INS' ATION. RACT�NG Co.
133 S . E. Madison
Portland , Oregon 97214 CON SI CN E 1934
•
( 503 ) 236-2532
sarving
Fax 236-6821 OREGON-WASH
JOB ADDRESS SINCE 1934
/1V! (. 4
f/ .-3-70 j ,=r/ . 9' ;:-y- 5�0c)
What You Should Know About R-Values. �RTrFrF O
R means resistance to heat flow. r; - `
The higher the R-value, ,� �� -.1,
DATE
the greater the insulating power. ril
To get the marked R-value, it is essential ci,• CORNIP.G yy�a' TOTAL
M/P.f ytprwt.fw
that insulation be installed properly. Paof�
Compare R-values before you buy.
All material Is guaranteed to be as specified. All measurements are approximate. All work will be completed In a workman-
like manner according to industry standards. Our workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation insurance.
OTY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
--....,;3;■ 7 . _-.$_.6.1.., 0--i-c__ Tit-,-/ -7 X. ‘'
4,64_' •
•
P 5-P .. /� -
-`
.. ... . ............. ....
Let us insulate :11 TOTAL
your home now!
CCB #1430 • 41-.' '! • THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
�-� /
WA REG. INSULCC 184 33 ' o ; ���/_/� 0-64-K-1)—\
�- `�'/ .,, . 1.: . SIGNED:
I/ •
'E 1•
DUE TO FLUCTUATION IN COST OF MATERIALS QUOTED PRICE MUST BE CONFIRMED AFTER 30 DAYS
tOPOSAL ACCEPTED: Signed Date
CITY OF TIGARD
41,COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION CHECKLIST ����'
cm' OF TIOARD
The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your
application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to
be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted
with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application.
See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard
Planning Division at (503) 639-4171.
Staff: Date:
I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS 1
A) Application form (1 copy) 2"
B) Owner's signature/written authorization
C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed ❑/
D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 18
-pp E) - Filing Fee $ ./Lits
{SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(SYPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED rrEMS
A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies
1 . Vicinity map ❑
2. Site size & dimensions 42r/c^P4,\
3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) g °nr/91
4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ❑
5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑
(a) Floodplain areas ❑
(b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑
(c) Unstable ground • ❑
(d) Areas with high seasonal water table
(e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑
(f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils C
6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive
Map Inventory including:
(a) Wildlife habitats
(b) Wetlands ❑
7. Other site features:
(a) Rock outcroppings
(b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑
8. Location of existing structures and their uses ❑
9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ❑
10. Location of existing utilities and easements 419 4A
11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways 'o
i%1/I9/� f�uL S�4f2 %0 4147 TLrGd)./cL�i✓i/l Iv/ 440//l044/il14/7 /' 4 6v
LANE)USE APPuUnON tST
PACE t Of 5
. -4 e. C2.01/40#-/- r 2 S/,eS - nn p/0/1
8) Site Development Irian Indicating: No. of Copies ill
1 - The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑
2. Contour line intervals ❑
3. The location, dimensions and names of all:
(a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and
easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑
(b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements
on the site ❑
(c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets
that require future extension ❑
4. The location and dimension of:
(a) Entrances and exits on the site ❑
(b) Parking and circulation areas ❑
(c) Loading and services area ❑
(d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑
(e) Outdoor common areas ❑
(f) Above ground utilities ❑
3. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all:
(a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and
easements which are located on the site and on adjacent
property within 25 feet of the site t�-7p 4.1
(b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements
on the site ❑
6. .,..jtorm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions g///4/3■9�(„0.G
7. Sanitary sewer facilities ,e-/V�.gf,c„S
8. The location areas to be landscaped 42-'0/7/04,,
9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime
prevention techniques ❑
10. The location of mailboxes ❑
11. The location of all structures and their orientation ❑
12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑
C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies
The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale
as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information:
1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating:
(a) General contour lines
(b) Slope ratios 0
(c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑
(d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑
2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual
substantiating:
(a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑
(b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑
(c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑
w+o USE APPtiUTlON 1157 PACE:a S
D) Architectural Drz izs Indicating: No. of Copies
The site development plan proposal shall include:
1 - Floor plans indicating the square footage or all structures c p/q�
proposed for use on-site /
2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure
E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /'
The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site
analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate:
1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 21/15/7/019,A
__-2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings p%, A'°"
3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑
--- 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials oy%,`
5. Landscape narrative which also addresses:
(a) Soil conditions ❑
(b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑
F) Sign Drawings: z
Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapte
- of the Code as part of the Site Development Revi- • . prior to-obtaining
a Building Permit to construct a sign.
G) Traffic Ge - . on Estimate: ❑
H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies
1. The owner of the subject parcel ❑
2. The owner's authorized agent ❑
3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arr- • and date ❑
4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑
5. Location, width and names of streets, easem- • . and other public
ways within and adjacent to the parcel G
6. Location of all permanent buildin: .n and within 25 feet of all
property lines ❑
7. Location and width of all w. er courses 0
8. Location of any trees w in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above
ground level ❑
9. All slopes great- an 25% ❑
10. Location of - sting utilities and utility easements ❑
11 . For major .nd partition which creates a public street:
(a) T- e proposed right-of-way location and width ❑
(b) - A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑
12. y applicable deed restrictions ❑
13, vidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land
division where applicable
LAND usF APPLICATION,LIST P.M:I 3 OF 3
I) Subdivision Prelir Iry Plat Map and Data Indicatini No. of Copies
1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one
phase per sheet ❑
2. The proposed name of the subdivision
3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and
collector streets ❑
4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, deve •per,
engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑
5. Date of application ❑
6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑
7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of record-• •wners of
adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land o
8. Contour lines related to a City-established bench• ark at 2-foot intervals
for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑
9. The purpose, location, type and size of all th- following (within and
adjacent to the proposed subdivision):
(a) Public and private right-of-ways an. easements ❑
(b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑
(c) Domestic water mains includin: fire hydrants ❑
(d) Major power telephone trans :ssion lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑
(e) Watercourses ❑
(f) Deed reservations for par open spaces, pathways and other
land encumbrances ❑
10. Approximate plan and profil:s of proposed sanitary and storm sewers
with grades and pipe sizes 'ndicated on the plans ❑
11. Plan of the proposed wat:r distribution system, showing pipe sizes and
the location of valves a • fire hydrants ❑
12. Approximate centerlin- profiles showing the finished grade of all streets
including street exte ions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of
the proposed subdi tsion ❑
13. Scaled cross secti•ns of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑
14. The location of a(l areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow 0
15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ •
16. The proposed rot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and
lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than
residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. o
17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at
4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings 0
18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures
and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures
are to remain after platting
19. Supplemental information including:
(a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) o
(b) Proof of property ownership o
(c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑
20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑
21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the
preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted
with the application
LAND LiSE,P°::CA''CN/UST PAGF•OF 3
,
J) Solar Access Calculations:
K) Other Information No. of Copies o
n:uoto+ env-dd;s
mav 23.1993
LAND USE APPLICATION./UST PACE OF 3
ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS
hoe
January 16, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Ed Murphy & Associates
9875 SW Murdock Street
Tigard, OR 97224
RE: Rhee Property at 11570 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Map 01100
Dear Mr. Murphy:
This letter is in response to your letter dated January 7, 1998. The conditions of
approval in question are related to our Engineering Department requirements. As you
stated, you spoke with Engineering about your proposal and were informed that they
could not agree. I have forwarded your letter to Brian Rager, Development Review
Engineer, for comments. To date, I have not received a response from him. Please
contact Brian directly for his input (503) 639-4171 x318.
When you discussed the background of the subect site, you stated that Mr. Rhee was
not aware of the improvements prior to purchasing the property. While he may not
have fully understood the timing of the improvements, he was made aware of the
improvements that would be required on numerous occasions prior to his purchase of
the property. I also told his agent many times that he would not be able to operate the
business prior to obtaining Final Site Plan approval which included making necessary
improvements. He did not close on the property until AFTER submittal of the Site
Development Review (SDR) application, which was several months after the initial pre-
application and subsequent related discussions. This is a key point to us. As
discussed in further detail below, many of the sites you referenced in your letter are, in
fact, in violation of changing use without obtaining prior approval. The owners,
however, were not aware that approvals and improvements were necessary. While
they will still be required to obtain the necessary approvals, they have been permitted to
continue to operate provided that they are moving forward on correcting the violations.
In Mr. Rhee's case, he was made aware of the required improvements and approvals
prior to the purchase of the property and application for SDR approval. We do not want
to set a precedent that allows people who have gone through an SDR to take
occupancy and begin a business without making the necessary improvements.
In response to your observation of other businesses in the Tigard Triangle area that
appear to have changed use without completing the required improvements, staff
actually discussed this prior to our initial response to you. Many of the businesses you
mentioned are technically in violation of the Code for converting to a commercial
business use without prior SDR approval and they have been contacted. Action is
beirg taken to bring them into compliance by obtaining SDR approval. Because these
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
Page 1 of 2
are under Code Enforcement action and the owners were not aware of the
requirements prior to starting the business, the situation is a little different. Other sites
you listed received SDR approval prior to adoption of the Tigard Triangle Design
Standards. These new standards require improvements to be completed at time of
development instead of accepting a non-remonstrance agreement. Finally, some of the
sites have received Home Occupation Permit approval and are operating under those
standards. If you want to discuss individual properties, I can go over these with you.
You asked if a Home Occupation Permit could be obtained for this site in the interim.
This is certainly an option, however, the person residing on the site must also work on
the site. Just because SOMEONE lives there does not qualify it as a Home
Occupation. The idea is that the primary use of the site is a home with the business
being secondary. If Mr. Rhee were to reside on the premises, he could apply for a Type
II Home Occupation Permit. However, he would be limited to, "No more than one
outside volunteer or employee who is not a principle resident of the premises." I am not
certain if he could meet that criteria based on his previous statement regarding the
number of employees he proposes. A Home Occupation is also limited to no more than
25% of the structure (meaning the area of the house devoted for business may only be
25% of the entire square footage of the structure). I have enclosed a copy of the Home
Occupation Permit Section of the Tigard Community Development Code for your
review, if this is still a viable option.
I hope this letter has adequately responded to your questions. If you have any
additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (503)
639-4171 .
Sincerely,
4/7:1.),L,
Julia Powell Hajduk
Associate Planner
i:'curolnyulia\sdrrheelet3
SDR 97-0012 Land Use File
1998 Planning Correspondence File
1/16,97 Murphy & Associates Letter Page 2 of 2
Re: Rhee Property in the T. Triangle
��� ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES �� ,4
■ Land Planning and Development Consulting Services kli\r
January 7, 1998
Dick Bewersdorff, Senior Planner
Department of Community Development
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Dick:
This letter is a follow up to my fax to you dated December 18th, 1997, to which I attached a
proposed agreement between Mr. Rhee and the City of Tigard. The intent of that agreement was to
allow Mr. Rhee to occupy the building before all the site and public facility improvements are
completed. I spoke with Agustin P. Duenas regarding the idea, and he said that he and Brian
Rager felt it could establish a precedent,and therefore they did not think the City would agree to
such an arrangement.
This letter is intended to pursue the possibility further,and look at other options.
BACKGROUND AND REASSURANCES.
1). First of all, this property owner is willing to make all the site and public improvements
required by the city. As I mentioned in my letter of December 18th, 1997,Mr. Rhee did not appeal
the conditions of approval. He simply wants to occupy the building as soon as possible.
2). In terms of fairness and equitable treatment, I reviewed other situations in the Tigard
Triangle,and elsewhere along 72nd street south of Highway 217, where other houses have been
converted to commercial uses without making similar site or street improvements. These are listed
on the attached page. Again, my client is not asking for relief from the requirements, but simply
relief from the requirement that all the required improvements be completed prior to occupancy.
Considering all the other uses in the area which have not made site or public improvements at all, a
little flexibility in terms of the timing of such improvements seems fair and reasonable.
3). Mr. Rhee had an expectation that the building he bought was approved for commercial
uses. The property is zoned for commercial uses; the previous owner had established a
commercial use;the previous owner had a city business license, and further, had completed some
interior remodeling of the building. Of course, in hindsight, he should have checked with the City
prior to purchasing the property, it is easy to see how he would have logically assumed that a
commercial use in the building would be allowed by the city without major improvements.
9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard,Oregon 97224
■Phone 503/624-4625 ■Cellular 503/314-0677 ■Fax 503/968-1674
PROPOSALS AND OPTIONS:
1). The proposal that I outlined in my December 18th letter to you still makes a lot of sense to
me, and allows Mr. Rhee some use of his property while still protecting the city's interests. The
City would have a financial guarantee that the work would be completed within a set time period.
2). An alternative approach might be to have the owner sign a non-remonstrance agreement,
giving his consent to a future Local Improvement District. This would be a logical way to improve
this entire block of street anyway, particularly since the property across the street on the east side
of 69th between Baylor and Atlanta is vacant,and the property just to the north of Mr. Rhee's
property(tax lot 1000)is for sale. An LID could be formed to complete all of this block of 69th all
at once, which would be much more efficient approach.
In any case,Mr. Rhee could sign such a non-remonstrance agreement, yet still go ahead
with the improvements. The City would have the assurance that, if for some reason Mr. Rhee did
not make the required improvements in a timely manner, the city could form an LID and complete
them. This might also solve the question of"precedent", since this approach has been used in the
past and will likely be used again in the future.
3). A combination of these two options could also be used, such as a financial guarantee for
the site and public improvements,coupled with a non-remonstrance agreement for the public
improvements. The city would be doubly covered under this approach.
4). Another option- on a different track- might be to allow Mr. Rhee to occupy the building
under a Type II Home Occupation permit. His nephew is living in the house, they have no
customers,and have only one or two employees plus Mr. Rhee and his wife. The home
occupation permit would only be needed until all the site and public improvements are completed.
Again, this may resolve the precedent issue.
It is my hope that the city staff will look at these and other options,and find a way that will allow
Mr. Rhee to move into the building prior to completion of all of the improvements. Having the
improvements designed and constructed could take several months,and meanwhile Mr. Rhee is
unable to use the property. Please give this your sincere consideration. I look forward to
discussing this with you further.
Sing. ely,
Itie--
Ed Murphy, I P
Businesses operating out of houses without full improvements to the site or public facilities:
• 11905 SW 69th. DSB Financial Services; Clean It Up Mark;Travel Tours, Inc.;Real Estate
Network Inc.; Goddard Properties, Inc. are all businesses operating out of a converted house
and garage. They have paved parking, but no street improvements or underground utilities or
streetscape landscaping.
• 12300 SW 69th. ACI Mechanical,plumbing contractor. Operating out of a converted house.
No street improvements or streetscape landscaping,and a gravel parking lot.
• 11580 SW 67th. Charles Nagel, architect. Operating out of a house. No street improvements
or streetscape landscaping.
• 11670 SW 67th. Eagle Team Communications. Operating out of a house. No street
improvements or streetscape landscaping.
• 11700 SW 67th. Wolf System, operating out of a converted house. Paved parking, but no
street improvements or streetscape landscaping.
• 7270 SW Hermosa. Mai's Travel service. Operating out of a converted house. Gravel
parking lot, no street improvements or streetscape landscaping.
• 1233 SW 72nd. Continental Machine Service Center. Paved parking, but no street
improvements or streetscape landscaping.
• 7075 SW Gonzaga. Weaver Technologies. Operating out of a house. No street
improvements or streetscape landscaping; partly paved, partly gravel parking.
• 6940 SW Baylor. Not sure if this is a business, but they recently constructed four on-site
gravel parking spaces.
Even some commercial or church uses operating out of commercial or former public buildings have
not constructed improvements,for instance:
• 12600 SW 72nd (Gonzaga and 72nd). No street improvements to either Gonzaga or 72nd.
(Kurahashi and Associates now occupy this building).
• 12615 SW 72nd. Vineyard Christian Fellowship, in the old Phil Lewis school. No street
improvements or streetscape landscaping.
JAN-24-98 04 : 15 AM P. 01
^i-
+ ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
Land Planning and Development Consulting Services
FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO
TO: City of Tigard, Planning SPR
ATI"N: Dick Bewersdorff
FAX #: 684-7297
RE: Rhee Dental Lab 1 15 7 0 SW 69th
DATE: 1/23/98
MESSAGE: The site plan for Mr. Rhee's Dental Lab, which was approved
by the city, appears to have a serious flaw. It shows the parking lot over an area
that mostly likely serves as the drainfield for the septic tank. Paving over the
drain lines will ultimately destroy the septic system (both because of the weight
of the vehicles, which could crush the drain lines, and because it stops
evaporation). In fact, even the gravel that is there should be removed and
replaced with soil to ensure the longevity of the septic System.
Although we have no record of exactly where the drainlines are, it seems prudent
to move the parking to another part of the property where there is no chance of
harming the septic system. Attached is a sketch of an alternative parking lot.
layout. Would you take a moment to review it, and let me know what type of
review is needed to make such a change to the site plan? (i.e., can you approve it
without going through another site development review process?). If it looks
doable in concept, then the design engineer will start drawing up a new site plan
for submittal to the city.
I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thanks Dick.
Ed Murphy, AIC.I'
9875 SW Murdock Street, Tigard, Oregon 97224
Phone (503) 624--162.5 - ('r•t[ultrr (503) .;14 0677 I Fax (503) 908-1071
. .
77"--
•/ - - - - -- -- - - - (-- SW ATLANTA STREET --) _ -
. ..
1
v,-....,)
r• I
-tp‘ -I-C. .0.'•:" __ _. _
1 T.
— --i- z
.___..,, ,...... ) i,-.,.) -1,7 ) • i i 1 4.
o
I
I ,I:i ..- , I
1-k - , I I ' Cin
1
! I >
....
141 0
. 10
...a = . 0
, 1 10. 2e
, 1 ..... z
z ..
..., 'ill ,
= , ,e -- I U 1
•I cm ■Imill
CC •••••"'"
1 = Z
... C.) ; 0.
0'
= 1 (—/-. ;S 1, 1(.) Z
CM
1
1
I CZ <
r• 1;pe E.
t I
„....
c. I . 1 c., cL.
-,...-
41 0
...,___ ,.... .
...
46%Pf.,•1, -- I 1 ct
I I l
1 1 1
i <
i.
I Z. ■11''' 1 I I I...
i •. .
., I
.:1t.,7 /
. /-il;,- . _.
1 ..y. ro ,,.% _.- 1 • u.
• -,..:. .4(11-3
.
.. . ri
I 0
(I - ... --.--Ofh
>im
m= .- ...■--- .... - ---
(..3:2)
I ...N.,
i i...
I CO I 0
I I_
—.... -- .. ... ..--.--
— — '-'— — — — — — SW BAYLOR STREET 4 - - - — - - - -
r - - -
.75TH Or II vion.1 1
r e- •ISert r,..ir
____.,_ ,
r 0 .o,,,,,,, r isi r
rLAmT 1..t,T
......_.. .._......_ ____ ...
..._.....- ..._
_ ....
SITE PLAN
; CASE NCO.
SDR 91-0012
EXHIBIT MAP Rhee Dental Office
, .
.......____....
Od wt, sT : ve 86-VZ-N1=11-
Z '
01261-7-
°I1114V APPLICATION FOR 1\ SPE TION TO AUTHORIZE
THE USE OF AN ON-SITE ),ISPOSA1.. SYSTEM
WW'.ASll1\-(: FON ( OI \T'\ DEPARTMENT OF 1Ih:-,LT H AND Hl NIA` F:IZ\
ENVIRONMENTAL H ALTH A:ND S:'.\IT-1T1O\
C•R #: •
DATE:
FEE PD: --
____ Authorization Notice lnspeciton
Biannual Inspection of hardship ( unpection
No Field Visit
MAP AND TAX LOT #: TOW: DD,SHIP I S RANGE I SECTION 36 T.L. # orlon
--
ROAD/DIRECTIONS: _Lac c 141.j . 'n 724 Ave.{ . -i LF oo Una fa Da-fi�ekfls S-�Ye ef,
ter!. o4th fe (aq h` A t/e •� (PW OV► �a� , c4 S11 ___ 5�'•—(J 70 SW
APPLICANT'S NAME: Pay1 Rhee Phone # (H): 57, - yo y8
ADDRESS: rs6-r5 Sw p frei S1-• (B): 636,- 263:
�erfa+.,� oR 97cc! r
Size of Property (Dimensions/Acreage) : io,ova 57.A'. Water Supply -Na i lh(41 Ltlaty air,
Why is the Authorization Notice needed? (describe in detail - if bedroom number change, describe previous and
proposed) . _� „1 � mss --tYu.� r-e s idl bt( is cam rue e c
t r !kaki" JAI;!LAY,ire site veme44,. A%t clud M .p2✓ed.__L461C.nI -14t'. ----- —
FOR SYSTEMS 5 YEARS OR OLDER. T;IF FOLLOWING REQUIRE ENTS �:L tiJ FIE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION:
Provide a pumping receipt with a septic tank inspection report from a licensed pumper Gated +--ithin
the last five years. The septic tank is required to be pumped out if that has not been done. The top of
the tank. baffles. and inlet and outlet fittings (when accessible) shall also be inspected.
-_ 2) Uncover the distribution box or top drop box.
3) County file is to be attached, or if the Health Department does not have a record of the system. attach
a plot plan which includes the locatUn of the house and all existing structures. drive s,
(including neighbors), property lines. location of septic tank, and location and length of drair:lines.
Include all distances and setback of septic tank, and location and length of drainlines. Include all
distances and setbacks. In some cases. portions of the drainfield may need to be uncovered.
FOR SYSTEMS LESS THAN $ YEARS OLD:
1) Portions of the system may be required to he exposed.
2'i it is recommended that steel tanks older than one year he uncovered and inspected.
FOR ALL SYSTEMS:
I) If the purpose of this inspection is for an addition to your residence, the location of this addition
must also be included on the plan.
2) Land-Use Compatibility Statement must be attached.
By my signature. 1 certify that the information I have furnished is correct, and hereby grant the W ashington
County Department of Health permission- to enter into the above described property for the purpose of this
application-
Signed By: --- Date: —. -- --
Please circle one: Owner Agent
J:\..\cnv\wpsharc\linda\authonot.04-30-97
/:)8 lY I•: 12: 47 FAX 5038934402 «ASH 17 U IIII'; Zi 003
_ — FOR DEa USE ONLY _ �.._.�
I I
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STATEMENT
FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS
APPLICANT'S NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE
RauI Rhee Paul Rkee. 6-3 -Z43
(56-75 5(.) P2f t c+•
B e a Jc rtti VI_, o'rcco h /7 60 4 —
CITY STATE ZIP
TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTION TAX LOT OR ACCT NO
P• O OI S I I 3h LSD OIlao_—_
G C
? A SUBDIVISION/PROJECT LOT 1 BLOCK COUNTY
R I West Po (or,41 14e(-41 Lis _i S`s ' - -- LjosIA∎iter ,1 —
TOj
Y N
PROPERTY IS A LOT OF RECORD CREATED BEFORE AUGUST 1, 1981.
ROPOSED LAND uSE -- /�
CO/Wert exl3f►VIy 511/71e Anti lq hawse of rls7o sw (o' t Ave- °
c e4cA( lab .
•
STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY FROM APPROPRIATE LAND USE AUTHORITY
(An equivalent statement may be provided in lieu of this form)
PROPERTY'S ZONING DESIGNATION
- — ►"� ec( Use_ ZfA I°yWlPtit CNIu t> ---- - - - — --- _ --- -
THE ABOVE PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE:
COFPATIBLE UIIK THE LCDC ACKNOWLEDGED n CONSISTENT W17H THE
— COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I—! STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
OR
;---�� NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE LCDC n NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
J ACKNOWLEDGED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN l.j STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
REASON FOR FINDING OF COMPATIBILITY / INCOMPATIBILITY l y
Pev aI 1a Is a used a((ot.4 d out rr��(� /H llle M115-
PROPERTY IS LOCATED: (check one)
INSIDE CITY LJ INSIDEEURBAN URBAN SCUNDARY ❑ GR TSIDE
LAND USE AUTHORITY
cIT1 of T1Go4ttb
SIGNED � I TITLE DATE
r�it•S � dci- �-o%�'rc v:,� �f .:r�f7,.•f,;,i%��i.r�.�� .;D!'QC�i�.�t. :�,-��ii'or.f
11 CITY/COUNTY CONCURRENCE IF INSIDE URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY
c.ru[n I TITLE , DATE
R. 97-o 0/,2,
RECD MAY 01 1998
ED MURPHY & ASSOCIATES
♦�♦ Land Planning and Development Consulting Services
April30, 1998
Jim Hendrix, Director
Department of Community Development
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97223
RE: Rhee Dental Lab, SDR 97-0012
Dear Jim:
I am writing this letter on behalf of Mr. Rhee, who is trying to convert a house into a dental lab on
SW 69th Street between SW Baylor Street and SW Atlanta Street. Mr. Rhee is increasingly
frustrated at the cost and complexity of trying to convert this house into a dental lab with four
employees, counting himself and his wife. Mr. Rhee's frustration is increased by what he
perceives as a lack of consistency and enforcement on the part of the city. He sees other property
owners in the area utilizing their property for commercial purposes without making any
improvements to their buildings, property or the public facilities
I wrote a letter to Dick Bewersdorff, dated January 7th, 1998,that identified some of these
properties. A copy of that list is attached, with updated notations. I received a letter back from
Julia Hajduk, in which she explained that some were legitimate home occupations, some were
illegal and under a compliance agreement, and some had just been there so long that they might
have preceded city regulations.
I recently drove back by the same properties, and while a few have since apparently gone out of
business, most are the same as they were in January. Plus, since then, I became aware of
Morton's Tree Service, SDR 95-0003, who were required in March of 1995 to construct street
improvements as a condition of approval, and have yet to do so.
I cannot advise my client to ignore the city rules,of course...but it does seem like he would have
been better off to just move into the building and not ask about city requirements. Even if
"caught", he could have claimed to be unaware of the requirements,and then negotiated a
compliance schedule. He would have at least gained quite a bit of time this way-- perhaps years--
before he would have to make any public facility or site improvements.
9875 SW Murdock Street Tigard,Oregon 97224
/Phone 503/624-4625 /Cellular 503/314-0677 /Fax 503/968-1674
In the same letter of January 13th, 1998, I suggested that the City ask Mr. Rhee to sign a letter of
non-remonstrance for a future LID. He already has water,and will continue to use the existing
septic tank. The street and storm drain improvements would make more physical sense and the
costs could be more equitably spread if they could be done all together through an LID. Plus, LID
improvements can be financed over a long term, with reasonable interest rates. I was told that
since the adoption of the Triangle Plan, the city doesn't accept non-remonstrances. Yet isn't the
city still accepting non-remonstrance agreements for future improvements to SW 70th?
You can imagine how all of this feels to my client. He sees the type of commercial activity
mentioned above all around him, and yet he is staring at$75,000- 80,000 worth of improvements
just to use an existing house(which had an commercial use in it when he bought it) for a dental
lab. Further, he is not even allowed to submit a performance bond so he could move in to the
building before the public improvements are completed, or sign a non-remonstrance agreement so
that the improvements could be constructed as a unit in the future.
My client would like to know the city's intentions or actions on the businesses listed on the
attached list, so at least he can feel he is being treated fairly and equitably. The idea of signing a
non-remonstrance in lieu of constructing some of the public improvements is mine, but I still think
it could be an option for this property and would like your response to that request.
Thank-you Jim,on behalf of the Mr. Rhee,for looking into this. I look forward to your response.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sine; el ,
f
Ed Murphy
' ' Original comments from a letter Jick Bewersdorff dated 1/07/98.
Businesses operating out of houses without full improvements to the site or public facilities:
• 11905 SW 69th. DSB Financial Services; Clean It Up Mark;Travel Tours, Inc.;Real Estate
Network Inc.;Goddard Properties, Inc. are all businesses operating out of a converted house
and garage. They have paved parking, but no street improvements or underground utilities or
streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same.
• 12300 SW 69th. ACI Mechanical, plumbing contractor. Operating out of a converted house.
No street improvements or streetscape landscaping, and a gravel parking lot. 4/29/98. Still the
same.
—4 f
VM9 • 11580 SW 67th. Charles Hagel,architect. Operating out of a house. No street improvements
or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same. No signs or any eveidence of a business
anymore here, though.
SW�,-o�Z• 11670 SW 67th. Eagle Team Communications. Operating out of a house. No street
9oss;l� « �� '°improvements or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Not operating out of this house anymore.
� House is for sale.
• 11700 SW 67th. Wolf System, operating out of a converted house. Paved parking, but no
s-DR 92--°a/7 street improvements or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same. They also have a fee-
A' J'/'°"f f,,�/ standing sign, about 3'X 4', plus signs on the building.
of-I v., 77.te.N.vlL
• 7270 SW Hermosa. Mai's Travel service. Operating out of a converted house. Gravel
parking lot, no street improvements or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same. They
L/vP 96-00g6 also have an approximately 2'X 3'banner hanging from the roof and an approximately 18"X
r .z/i4 -'1Q/�11f 30" sign in the /window.f
• _ 1233 SW 72nd. Continental Machine Service Center. Paved parking, but no street
improvements or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same. They also have a free
standing sign, and eight separate signs on the building.
• 7075 SW Gonzaga. Weaver Technologies. Operating out of a house. No street
improvements or streetscape landscaping;partly paved, partly gravel parking. 4/29/98. Still
the same.
,-47,s ,,,b/4 , • 6940 SW Baylor. Not sure if this is a business, but they recently constructed four on-site
s=�
frffr 9g_c 5.4 gravel parking spaces. 4/29/98. Still the same.
Even some commercial or church uses operating out of commercial or former public buildings have
not constructed improvements, for instance:
• 12600 SW 72nd (Gonzaga and 72nd). No street improvements to either Gonzaga or 72nd.
(Kurahashi and Associates now occupy this building). 4/29/98. Still the same. This building
was designed and utilized as a school, I think; the use has now changed to offices.
• 12615 SW 72nd. Vineyard Christian Fellowship, in the old Phil Lewis school. No street
improvements or streetscape landscaping. 4/29/98. Still the same. The building was designed
and utilized as a school, and changed from a school to a church.
edmurphy!clients/rhee/letters/430/98
Attoiffot
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
June 28, 1999
Paul Rhee
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
Dear Mr. Rhee:
I received your letter dated June 20, 1999. I understand the predicament
you are in, however, I can not give you permission to use the existing
building because you have not met the conditions of approval. Because
the conditions of approval have not been met, you are not authorized to be
using the building for business purposes. If we receive a complaint that
you are operating a business at this location, I must have our Code
Compliance Officer investigate. If it is found that you are operating a
business, code compliance action may be taken which could involve a fine
and citation into court.
Sincerely,
AC,14,,?4_GL_
ulia Powell Hajduk
Associate Planner
i:\curpin\julia\Rhee let.doc
c: SDR 97-0012 Land use file
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772
/567S ,Sl,, Pckid d
,wv.4(,)o� ��� M 99
�)a v 4/k!. 9a/A...*L �ow� � �u jt)
JUN 2 3 1999
L 1 Dw ?e2 074 averse c s 4.)es 1 K7/ th.e..
/1,0;9 //Sg 0 5 G' .._._5 / q4e/W `l' 97 Z Z 3 •
p,tc$�k,/CLa �,, zl..� �h_oPe/e.� k�: t z, w_ �o C6ra
Y U
�v e f tC on.v►m e r ci c_o c/e 071 a.,
/
o do/% fry- QY► eh z . 4-4
ZA-e="4 .
/7 s b e- - 4,er ire, i tA2 v U T�f C.3 . 5 O Z Aea-e/
�,wPn�auiNle.l< r h �s hz� 7y ^�� ru�
?z o W a- i¢!' 4I l o-o
dodo vs On iy-e-i13 <O L de C/4 4' ON 14 Cd7woerG%j
- -e- OS r�-ey ' .ve-s 7 `r7 �'4 �t-� w` �,.e_ 41,
1/4/ � .0 7r z'kt 07LZ,dee
os�� o
e ` 6(-c "-c.� C Mere 404
d\-1 r
/66S 0 S c.J /3t ,t4-- 7-re �p� e 65ov y7 S- �J
/t/f y /,-" ah )nom ove 4_, kfr z,
i Qv / Y �
-y1z.J 6 u,jeiti i 0 d S w 0 , 4-&--e>7 pro L61 r/1/14C-ti.
/� - , L 6,,a1 )pe)P-e_ Gu
1,- Ott-i t S Jr 7 %4-:r 61/0 c` 6 u s i#e L s O•-►, r��4
A-tr /e rhl c' S;e11
N u.ems � 1, to•c4
AfIL4-Ci aeA-,e■ 6tY ) 2E17 C-40741074:fee f4,m,
ALA, cyPec;"ai-L cto-cf • `'
avi, . fd/__ C a.l' Ale 62.0 -y 2 v.�
S CZ 4,1.4
atAX ,./ TL4.ti,174)-(14-
4, ......„A
January 15, 1999 1 CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
Paul Rhee
15675 SW Petrel Court
Beaverton, OR 97006
RE: SDR 97-0012 Located at 11570 SW 69th Avenue
Dear Mr. Rhee:
A comment was recently received at the City indicating that you are using the site
located at 11570 SW 69th Avenue to conduct a business from. A drive-by site
visit did not confirm one way or the other that a business was being operated.
This letter is to inform you that If you are currently using this site to operate a
commercial business (dental lab) you are in violation of the City of Tigard
Community Development Code Standards and are subject to action by the Code
Compliance Division.
This letter is also to remind you that you have not received final approval to use
the site as a dental lab. The Site Development Review (SDR 97-0012) approval
you received has conditions that are required to be met prior to occupying the
building. As of the date of this letter, none of the conditions have been met. The
SDR approval is valid for 18 months, which means that the approval for SDR 97-
0012 will expire on June 1, 1999. If the conditions of approval have not been met
and/or an extension has not been requested and granted, you will be required to
submit a new SDR application after that date prior to occupying the building.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x407.
Sincerely,
Julia Powell Hajduk
Associate Planner
is\curpin\julia\sdr\rhee.doc
c: Matt Scheidegger, Code Compliance Officer
SDR 97-0012 Land use file
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772