Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1998-00017
SDR98 - 00017 DURHAM / HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION • NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 98-0017 CITY OF TIOARD DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION Community'Deveropment Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 3/18/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION Site Development Review SDR 98-0017 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to add a 3,020 square foot building addition to an existing industrial building. This site would also be added to an adjoining industrial park. OWNER: Pacific American APPLICANT:John Boutinen Property Exchange ESI 2390 East Camelback Road 7360 SW Hunziker St. Pheonix, AZ 85016 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. The site is on the west side of SW 85th Avenue, south of SW Durham Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18. 116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. STAFF DECISION Staff finds that the proposed development will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, the Director hereby APPROVES this application, subject to the following Conditions of Approval: DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 1 OF 17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S), THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager in the Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 85th Avenue to increase the right-of- way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate a public sidewalk easement over the portions of the existing sidewalk that will fall outside of the newly dedicated public ROW. 3. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 4. The applicant shall provide two additional parking lot trees to meet the 1 tree for each 7 parking space requirement. This condition may be met if trees 5 and 6 are preserved. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 5. The applicant shall provide an arborist report for trees numbered 5 and 6. This report will need to state that they are not viable for preservation given the proposed disruption of adjoining drip line areas or their existing condition. If an arborist finds these trees to be unviable, the applicant has been required to provide 3 new parking lot trees that should then be considered to be of equal character. If the arborist report finds that they can be preserved, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to preserve these trees. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 6. Proposed new parking spaces will also be served from the existing driveway on an adjoining property. For this reason, the applicant shall either record a joint access/maintenance agreement to ensure this access or provide proof of lot consolidation with the adjoining industrial property. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 7. The applicant shall provide a mechanical equipment screening plan that demonstrates that any rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a statement indicating that no new or existing mechanical equipment will be left unscreened as a result of the proposed site modifications. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 2 OF 17 8. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack detail that demonstrates that a minimum of one bicycle parking space is being provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 9. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan that addresses the issues discussed in the Staff Comments portion of this report. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf, Police Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the approved revised site plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 11. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City. Vicinity Information: Adjoining properties are zoned Industrial Park; I-P. This area is predominantly developed with an adjoining industrial park, USA sewage treatment facilities and Tigard High School. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is .64 acres and is presently developed with a 2,065 square foot office/warehouse building. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 3 OF 17 improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant submitted an impact study that specifically quantified the impacts of this development on public facilities and systems. The applicant's narrative concurred with the construction completion of half street improvements. The applicant also agreed to pay all other applicable systems development charges that are assessed prior to the issuance of Building Permits. According to the Washington County TIF Ordinance, 32% of a project's impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the equation provided by the Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June, 1995. The proposed industrial building addition is expected to generate new vehicle trips on the City's street system. The added trips will take up capacity on the City street system that must be accommodated by infrastructure improvements. According to the TIF Ordinance, an Industrial Park Use has a trip generation factor of 6.97 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the applicant has proposed to develop an additional 3,060 square feet of Industrial Park space, this new use would be expected to generate approximately 21 new vehicle trips per day. A portion of SW 85th Avenue is designated as an Arterial Street in the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. The portion of SW 85th Avenue that this site has frontage on appears to be covered by Note #8 of the plan that discusses the potential for a future extension of SW Hall Boulevard across Cook Park to Tualatin. The TIF assessment is currently $182.00 for each industrial use trip according to the Washington County TIF Ordinance. Using the above, the unmitigated impact of the proposal is as follows: Full Impact 21 x $537.50 = $ 11,907 Less TIF Assessment 21 x $172.00 = $ 3,822 Unmitigated Impact $ 8,085 Assuming completion of the half-street improvements on the remaining southern portion of the site frontage of 20 feet, project costs are $50 per lineal foot. Total project cost to the applicant is $1,000. Because the overall Arterial and Collector Street infrastructure traffic costs are partially unmitigated by the TIF Program, a total $7,085 remains an unmitigated traffic impact of this development. Therefore, the cost of completion of half street improvements along the project frontage is much less than the unmitigated project impact and can easily be required. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 4 OF 17 Use Classification: Section 18.68.030 lists manufacturing and wholesale, storage, and distribution as permitted uses in the I-P zone. The applicant is proposing to build a warehouse addition to an existing industrial building. The proposed floor plan would provide a future tenant with office and warehouse space which are permitted uses. Specific future tenants will have to be among those listed as permitted uses in the zoning district. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping. The site has a width of approximately 125 feet, thereby, exceeding the minimum lot width requirement. The total area of the site is approximately .64 acres. Of the total site acreage, the applicant is proposing to leave approximately 9,343 square feet, or 33% of the site for landscaping. The proposal, therefore, is providing landscape area that is in excess of the minimum required. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 35 feet and there is no side, or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum permitted building height is 45 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the front yard setback is 35 feet. Side and rear yard setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of approximately 17 feet. This is well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of 1 tree for each 7 parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be 3 feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, a row of existing street trees will be preserved along the SW 85th Avenue frontage to provide screening. Based on their size, these plantings are expected to screen the parking lot and a roll up door from view of the adjoining right-of-way. Another proposed roll up loading door would not be visible from SW 85th Avenue. The applicant has also proposed to provide a 25 foot setback as measured from the edge of adjoining sidewalk. This setback will provide a buffer that is expected to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining street right-of-way. Because 27 parking spaces are proposed, a minimum of 4 parking lot trees are required. required. A total of 2 parking lot trees are proposed. For this reason, 2 additional parking lot trees shall be provided. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding 3 feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between 3 and 8 feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 5 OF 17 along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these 2, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance will be provided in accordance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(D)(2) requires a minimum of 1 parking space per 1000 square feet gross floor area within warehouse (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of patron serving area and 1 space per 200 square feet of office area) for Wholesaling, storage, and distribution. The applicant identified a total of 3,802 square feet ratio of warehouse square footage requiring 4 parking spaces. The applicant also indicated that 1,323 square feet of office is to be provided at a ratio of one space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area. Where office areas are developed with warehousing, the parking ratio is one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. For this reason, 7 additional parking spaces are required for the planned office area. A total of 11 parking spaces are required. The parking ratio for the proposed building floor plan is met because a total of 27 parking spaces will be provided. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that all parking areas shall be provided with disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and Federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 2 disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. The plan shows the provision of a total of 2 disabled parking spaces. These spaces as proposed, preliminarily satisfy this requirement. The Building Department will review these design details through the Building Permit Plan Check review process. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because a minimum of 11 parking spaces are required to serve this site, 1 bicycle parking space is required. The plan shows an area for bicycle parking but does not provide a bicycle parking rack design detail. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack detail that demonstrates that a minimum of 1 bicycle parking space is being provided. Off Street Loading: Section 18.106.080 requires that off-street loading spaces be provided for buildings in excess of 10,000 square feet. The total building square footage does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, this requirement is not applicable. However, the applicant has provided two off-street loading spaces to serve the proposed expanded warehouse space. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses that require up to 100 parking spaces provide 1 access point with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as the preliminary plan maintains the site's existing driveway to SW 85th Avenue. Proposed new parking spaces will also be served from the existing driveway on an adjoining property. For this reason, the applicant shall either record a joint access/maintenance agreement to ensure this access or provide proof of lot consolidation with the adjoining industrial property. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 6 OF 17 development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The proposed site plan shows the provision of a walkway connection from the main building entrance to SW 85th Avenue, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans shows the location of a trash/recycling enclosure that complies with the service standard of the franchise hauler. The applicant included a letter from the franchise hauler to this effect. The enclosure's location complies with the City's visual clearance standards in terms of its location. Site Development Review -Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Chapter 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180(A).1. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The standards listed below are not found to be applicable because the proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.(A): (3) (Exterior Elevations), (5) (Privacy and Noise), (6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), (7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use),(8) (Open Space Dedication), (9) (Demarcation of Spaces), (12) (Public Transit), (17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A): This application is found to have elements related to the following subsections: (2) (Tree Removal), (4) (Buffering and Screening and Compatibility Between DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 7 OF 17 Adjoining Uses, (10) Crime Prevention and Safety), (11) (Access and Circulation), (13) (Parking), (14) (Landscaping), (15) (Drainage), (16) (Provisions for the handicapped), and (18) (Underlying Provisions of the Zone). These subsections are addressed immediately below or elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180(A).2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The proposed plan will retain all 5 existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. Three other trees under 12 inches in diameter will be removed. One of the three trees is needed to be removed to finish a required street frontage sidewalk. Two other trees numbered 5 and 6 may need to be removed to accommodate proposed parking spaces. It appears that both trees could be saved if 1-3 parking space were not built. The proposed parking lot would provide more than double the amount of required parking spaces, therefore, the applicant shall preserve or provide an arborist report for trees numbered 5 and 6. This report will need to state that they are not viable for preservation given the proposed disruption of the drip line area or their existing condition. If an arborist finds these trees to be unviable, the applicant has been required to provide 3 new parking lot trees that should then be considered to be of equal character. If the arborist report finds that they can be preserved, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to preserve these trees. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180(A).4 states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). Section 18.120.180(A).4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties. A mechanical equipment plan was not provided that demonstrates rooftop equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop or by the building parapet. The applicant shall provide a mechanical equipment screening plan that demonstrates that any rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop or by the building parapet. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a statement indicating that no new or existing mechanical equipment will be left unscreened as a result of the proposed site modifications. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180(A).10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and has requested revisions to the proposed security lighting plan. The requested revisions are reviewed within the Section VI. Staff Comments portion of this report. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 8 OF 17 Access: Section 18.120.180(A).11 requires that site access meet the minimum standards set forth in Section 18.108. Provisions for emergency vehicle access circulation shall be addressed. Provisions for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways shall be provided if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The site has been reviewed for compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108 elsewhere within this staff report. Emergency vehicle circulation access has been provided along two sides of the building. The Building Division has preliminarily reviewed this plan for Uniform Fire Code compliance. A detailed review and any required site modifications will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant has proposed to construct a sidewalk across the property frontage on SW 85th Avenue but no other pedestrian/bicycle ways are designated through this site. Parking: Section 18.120.180(A).13 requires that the standards of Section 18.106, the Clear Vision standards of Section 18.102 and the Access. Egress and Circulation standards of Section 18.108 be reviewed. These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.120.180(A).14 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Drainage: Section 18.120.180(A).15 requires that the applicant comply with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicants' preliminary drainage proposal and is discussed elsewhere within this report. Handicapped Accessibility Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).16 requires that the handicapped facilities be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 487 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. The provision for a handicapped accessible walkway route from the street, and handicapped accessible parking has preliminarily been reviewed within this report. A detailed review for compliance will be conducted prior to the issuance of building permits by the Building Division. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).18 requires that an application comply with the all other applicable standards of the provisions of the underlying zone shall apply. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Street Trees: Section 18.100.030 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The plan proposes to preserve 4 existing trees that are spaced from 15-28 feet on center. Due to their size, these species are considered large species and comply with spacing requirements. The applicant has also proposed to plant an additional 3" street tree of undetermined species type to be planted near the southern property line. Due to physical site constraints such as driveways, the 4 existing trees and 1 new tree comply with the spacing standard for a site with 125 feet of width as set forth in this section. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 9 OF 17 existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has provided a plan that identified all existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. The applicant has not proposed to remove any of the 5 existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. Since the applicant is retaining 100% of the existing trees on site, Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d) requires no mitigation. Signs: Section 18.114.130(F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. PUBLIC FACILITIES STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 85th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street and is currently constructed to this standard. This street type is to be constructed within a 50-foot ROW. At present there is not 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site. As a part of this application, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline. The street has been improved adjacent to this site, so no additional improvements are necessary. Note No. 8 of the City's Transportation Plan Map indicates that this section of SW 85th Avenue may be considered for further expansion as a southern extension of Hall Boulevard to tie in with SW Boones Ferry Road in Tualatin. Should this occur, additional ROW to provide 45 feet from the centerline would be needed to accomplish this. In order to ensure that this expansion could be accommodated in the future, the applicant will be required to preserve the area equal to 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's plan appears to accommodate the 45 feet reserve area. The existing sidewalk meanders around some existing trees near the curb line. When the additional ROW is dedicated, there will still be portions of the sidewalk outside of the ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate a sidewalk easement to cover those portions. WATER: The City of Tigard provides the water service in this area. The existing building is presently served from the water system. There does not appear to be a need for further water line work with this expansion. SANITARY SEWER: The site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. There does not appear to be a need for additional public sewer line work with this project. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 10 OF 17 STORM DRAINAGE: There is an existing on-site storm drainage system on this site. The building addition will result in additional impervious areas on this site, which will increase the storm water runoff. The applicant's engineer prepared a downstream analysis, which shows that the additional runoff of approximately 0.55 cubic feet per second (cfs) will be insignificant to the downstream system. Therefore, it is Staffs opinion that on-site detention is not necessary. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to provide a linear compost filter vault on-site to treat the storm water from this site. The applicant's engineer submitted a preliminary sizing calculation that indicates the vault can easily be accommodated on this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility, to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been received. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 11 OF 17 SECTION VI. STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department provided the following comments: Based on the size of the proposed addition, the need for additional lighting on the west and south side of the addition appear necessary. The plans presently allow for installation of 1 HPS exterior wall pack. This does not appear to provide adequate lighting. There is no reference to any proposed lighting on the south slide of the structure as well. The City of Tigard Building Division provided the following comments: If the second proposed building exit is required by the occupant load the accessible path must lead to and connect with the public way. Separate permits are required for the proposed awnings. A Geo-Technical Report for liquefaction will be required. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING JANUARY 7, 1999 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY JANUARY 27, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. l THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1999 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . ft l2Ve'& January 7. 1999 PREPARED Mar(Roberts DATE Associate Planner, AICP dip" 64'' � January 7. 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd. DATE Planning Managa, i:curpin\mjr\sdr\sdr98-17.dec DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 12 OF 17 • — -- -!I--0k-d9INF A66E53-BRNF----------I r me,- e } /i 4i nn • i. " . . . ' t '''' Iiiiii 1 . . . .1 . .... .i'•. .1k'y e : 1 01 i P i' .;•110. ::`,".,. ;;4 ,' ttb„, 111N1 . , .gi . . . I 1"!9 i ■ __t. -, ``fit \\\� �A. „� \, 0• F \ ��� al rvii ,„; 1 it 1 f , 11, t ,.,i . 1 NA g voi, = r . '. i &t . , \\,\ \ •' - 1 - 1 ',g1 1 . MINIM �r• X3 o i It."� "1 Ff ilL —141______. : • 1 I-I o d Fs ,•tai• 1 • Cg tin CO 3i l. , •9'1o:.: .a 4 • .. ar..� • Pall exiernn kiptitaL:.'0440.•10,:i'..97.P..:::.7...412.1*a N --- ----- ` - -'�I+DSSh AYEWE---- �r �� -�-- 1 x" CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION !1► yqE1q ,A ..'."'.1 . - ram CITY of TIGARD• , ,,,= , ., . GOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM.......... r...4... is diri a El ;ir c740,1 ■► to Y. i'�1111 VICINITY MAP ihOrmidik Mil • ...1 t►� ��i�� �I■�� �� —!i11111111i1 P N .�ii1111 2,10 t■ •.. 1111111111 moo d � 11111 ►/'' E L 11111 _■�ati��1i�1111�/ rian :: .:.�.� ll SOD 98 0017 DURHAM ■� '1111 ,` IIIII r RD DURHAM RD DURHAM/HALL L iul BUSINESJOR S PARK 11 11 ! . MA SUBJECT' MODIFICATION P ) iuiimi ` PARCEL . :NI .. ( ■ R ■. : . 3 N\ ' 111111111111111/ . 0■46110110 . N Yea11110.114Ra 0 200 400 600 Feet 1"4 488 feet A .,,, ``0`` L� 1 a I /L City of Tigard c M1 Intormatlon on Mis map ls for yenanl location ony and C. should be verified with the Development Services Division. i13125 SW Hall Blvd Tlpard.OR 97223 (503)839.4171 hllp:tlwww.G.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Nov 20, 1998;C:lmagic\MAGICO2.APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIIIGARD Community Development Shaping)4(Better Community DATE: November 23,1998 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division NOV 2 3 1998 STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public support facilities; professional and administrative services; financial, insurance and real estate services; business support services; manufacturing of finished products; packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday, December 3, 1998. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the foliou ing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODI CATION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community DATE: November 23,1998 TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division NOV 2 5 1998 STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031 684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION < A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public support facilities; professional and administrative services; financial, insurance and real estate services; business support services; manufacturing of finished products; packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday, December 3, 1998. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓' Written comments provided below: �a�ed sir\ -ko- osc Vow-A cka&Aor) , a\r. c`xx X Stw oM.‘kNona\ \*\"(J t,c\ AN.) W c,1&L enhd co kkh c o o F a6t6■0<\o(' %Wad rN1c1I4taa y- "t�•� cb Qc n�l� vA\\ow cw Nv, oMacwr' ok Gl 0(4' \95 ilk A o/ ujo.k\-Pack• V I duo hot- -fee\ woad p o,IA- alcN)ckr Vet 1vvv 15 r0 RINtA emcs- 1a o" 1.�vk�Nq o� 5►\O^ ' °A- c 1Q0c JY OS wo• U r� (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 6,M *1,\R Phone Number's): VA-Nom, aa,o I SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 23,1998 TO: Development Services Technicians 0* Bonnie: Jim:` Debbie: )iur Geo: - Dianna: ✓ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division RECEIVED PLANNING STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner NOV 3 01998 Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7291 CITY OF TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0011 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public support facilities; professional and administrative services; financial, insurance and real estate services; business support services; manufacturing of finished products; packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday, December 3, 1998. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V �► (['lease provide the following information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Number(s): SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Community,Development Shaping Better Community DATE: November 23,1998 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: David Scott,Building Official DEC 01 1998 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0011 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public support facilities; professional and administrative services; financial, insurance and real estate services; business support services; manufacturing of finished products; packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday, December 3, 1998. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: -fhe 2 a fx i i dzPJ••l G 0c4 i,,,„ lnti �'-�, ar €rPJfI (2-7) 1t�n✓ n�t g'1 -aI ,�J may'-!) f`r,'pi Fe r /4d a (/-fo Jr-ip A✓).- L rp k .0 1-4i, 1'707'1 ( 1 n r ��• r// ti ►► (Tease provide the}ollawing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: [Phone NumberIsl: ?TO SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: December 31, 1998 TO: Mark J Roberts FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 98-0017, Durham/Hall Business Park Major Modification Description: This application is for the construction of a 3,020 square foot (sf) addition to an existing building and for additional parking. The site is located at 16295 SW 85th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 14AD, Tax Lot 1104). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW 85th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street and is currently constructed to this standard. This street type is to be constructed within a 50-foot ROW. At present there is not 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site. As a part of this application, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline. The street has been improved adjacent to this site, so no additional improvements are necessary. Note No. 8 of the City's Transportation Plan Map indicates that this section of SW 85th Avenue may be considered for further expansion as a southern extension of Hall Boulevard to tie in with SW Boones Ferry Road in Tualatin. Should this occur, additional ROW to provide 45 feet from the centerline would be needed to accomplish this. In order to ensure that this expansion could be accommodated in the future, the applicant will be required to preserve the area equal to 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's plan appears to accommodate the 45 feet reserve area. The existing sidewalk meanders around some existing trees near the curb line. When the additional ROW is dedicated, there will still be portions of the sidewalk outside of the ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate a sidewalk easement to cover those portions. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0017 Durham/Hall Business Park PAGE 1 2. Water: The City of Tigard provides the water service in this area. The existing building is presently served from the water system. There does not appear to be a need for further water line work with this expansion. 3. Sanitary Sewer: The site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. There does not appear to be a need for additional public sewer line work with this project. 4. Storm Drainage: There is an existing on-site storm drainage system on this site. The building addition will result in additional impervious areas on this site, which will increase the storm water runoff. The applicant's engineer prepared a downstream analysis, which shows that the additional runoff of approximately 0.55 cubic feet per second (cfs) will be insignificant to the downstream system. Therefore, it is Staff's opinion that on-site detention is not necessary. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to provide a linear compost filter vault on-site to treat the storm water from this site. The applicant's engineer submitted a preliminary sizing calculation that indicates the vault can easily be accommodated on this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0017 Durham/Hall Business Park PAGE 2 responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility, to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 85th Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate a public sidewalk easement over the portions of the existing sidewalk that will fall outside of the newly dedicated public ROW. 3. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0017 Durham/Hall Business Park PAGE 3 maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 4. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \\bg333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\comments\sd r98-0017.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0017 Durham/Hall Business Park PAGE 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY F TIGARD Community Development Shaping)4 Better Community DATE: November 23,1998 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday, December 3, 1998. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ( a.se provide the fodowing information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: Phone Number[sl: 1 SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CIT Ana: (CI (El (SI [Wl CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ® Place for review In library err Book[:l FILE NO(SI.: sioQ `lam- (70/7 FILE NAMES]: , ( L? „4 CITY OFFICES _AI..VA[JCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,pi,n.nos...,,.ar "C9MIU((INITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJc> S..<..T.�nn... POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,c„m.v.«.,,�a„o,rk. _9UILDING DIV./David Scott,eevangaKw 1�E�r-. -ERING DEPTJBnan Rager,oa n.a«..e v _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,o,..,,�,...,, _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,cmR.cvo.r t!OPEAATIONS DEPTJJohn Roy, M.,,,o.r OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL-HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS -. . —CITY OF BEAVERTON alt _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR. DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,N.rgMmd cooed. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR. PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING al) _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ an US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham, OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growh Management c..rdmator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Groonspac.s coordinator(cPA yzoA s) 1 175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) _WASHINGTON COUNTY alt King City,OR 97224 Building#16, Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Ptannng 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO alt 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director OR. DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera _ODOT,REGION 1 alt _ Brent Curtis(CPAs) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,oviPmi.R.',Cooed-_ Scott King)CPA si —CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _ Mike Borreson)Engmee.) David Knowles,Piannmg Bureau Dv. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _ Jim Tice(lox.' Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON, DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _ Tom Harry)c. 01 Pi Apps i 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A alt _ Phil Healy lc�r.ry Pl.Apps) Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit spbnansr _ Sr.CartographertcpNzcA-Ms 141 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _TCI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay, Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 —COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY —PORTLAND WESTERN RIR _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr,Region Manager Michael Kiser,Project Planner 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton, OR 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 _GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft, Engineenng _OREGON ELECTRIC R/R _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: OR030546 (IURLNAONNOR7NrRN/SANTA ifR/RPROASSOR) Clifford C.Cabe.Construction Engineer Pete Nelson Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay,Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 alt - INDICATES AUTOMATIC MOTIF/CATION If WITH/14 SI0' Of fat SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR AMY/ALL Cllr PROJECTS. frr'OJECT PLANNER 1S RLSPONSIDLU TOR INDICATING PARTICI 1r0 MO1fIFT/ hApaity■nastersvicnouce.mst 16-Jan-98 PT .ANNING SECRETARY MATERIALS A • . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .. CITY OF TIOARD Community Deve(opment ShapingA Better Community STATE. OE OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford,, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) I NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR:. ., 7 AMENDED NOTICE (File No Name Reference) • City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR 98-0017/DURHAM-HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION __ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) E City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR: _ I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council L NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: . I (F■e No.Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 7111 day of Janu. , 1999, nd deposited in the United States Mail on the 7th day of January, 1999, postage prepaid. . //X- (Perge that • epard N ce) ff r before me on the (� � day of �.// 19 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed med be o e r� y --..., OFFICIAL SEAL /���,�,, , 1 1, `lJ / ' NOTARY��LIC OF i R :•r,�t�� DIANE M JELDERKS !� NOTARY SIGN N OREGON �;� COMMISSION NO.046142 7 1999 My Commission Expires: 7 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, !� NOTI4EOF RECISION SITE D�PIEEI I EIIIEIW ISDM 98-0011 �I CITY OF TIGARD 11111111111/111111 B*$I II K JoHODIH OII community,Uevefopment < S(aping 4(Better Community 120 DAYS = 3/18/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION Site Development Review SDR 98-0017 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to add a 3,020 square foot building addition to an existing industrial building. This site would also be added to an adjoining industrial park. OWNER: Pacific American APPLICANT:John Boutinen Property Exchange ESI 2390 East Camelback Road 7360 SW Hunziker St. Pheonix, AZ 85016 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, manufacturing of finished products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage, and distribution, among other uses. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. The site is on the west side of SW 85th Avenue, south of SW Durham Road. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18. 116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. STAFF DECISION finds that ' posed d v� ht Aft net very the head, � and welkin*Of 0:1 Th : D Director hereby YES tti tppli i� sub ect to the foH io n+ ldl 11 Ap ' * ' � DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 1 OF 17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S), THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager in the Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 85th Avenue to increase the right-of- way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 2. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate a public sidewalk easement over the portions of the existing sidewalk that will fall outside of the newly dedicated public ROW. 3. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 4. The applicant shall provide two additional parking lot trees to meet the 1 tree for each 7 parking space requirement. This condition may be met if trees 5 and 6 are preserved. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 5. The applicant shall provide an arborist report for trees numbered 5 and 6. This report will need to state that they are not viable for preservation given the proposed disruption of adjoining drip line areas or their existing condition. If an arborist finds these trees to be unviable, the applicant has been required to provide 3 new parking lot trees that should then be considered to be of equal character. If the arborist report finds that they can be preserved, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to preserve these trees. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 6. Proposed new parking spaces will also be served from the existing driveway on an adjoining property. For this reason, the applicant shall either record a joint access/maintenance agreement to ensure this access or provide proof of lot consolidation with the adjoining industrial property. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 7. The applicant shall provide a mechanical equipment screening plan that demonstrates that any rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a statement indicating that no new or existing mechanical equipment will be left unscreened as a result of the proposed site modifications. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 2 OF 17 8. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack detail that demonstrates that a minimum of one bicycle parking space is being provided. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 9. The applicant shall provide a security lighting plan that addresses the issues discussed in the Staff Comments portion of this report. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Wolf, Police Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 10. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the approved revised site plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 11. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: No other development applications were found to have been filed with the City. Vicinity Information: Adjoining properties are zoned Industrial Park; I-P. This area is predominantly developed with an adjoining industrial park, USA sewage treatment facilities and Tigard High School. Site Information and Proposal Description: The subject site is .64 acres and is presently developed with a 2,065 square foot office/warehouse building. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 3 OF 17 improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant submitted an impact study that specifically quantified the impacts of this development on public facilities and systems. The applicant's narrative concurred with the construction completion of half street improvements. The applicant also agreed to pay all other applicable systems development charges that are assessed prior to the issuance of Building Permits. According to the Washington County TIF Ordinance, 32% of a project's impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the equation provided by the Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June, 1995. The proposed industrial building addition is expected to generate new vehicle trips on the City's street system. The added trips will take up capacity on the City street system that must be accommodated by infrastructure improvements. According to the TIF Ordinance, an Industrial Park Use has a trip generation factor of 6.97 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the applicant has proposed to develop an additional 3,060 square feet of Industrial Park space, this new use would be expected to generate approximately 21 new vehicle trips per day. A portion of SW 85th Avenue is designated as an Arterial Street in the City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. The portion of SW 85th Avenue that this site has frontage on appears to be covered by Note #8 of the plan that discusses the potential for a future extension of SW Hall Boulevard across Cook Park to Tualatin. The TIF assessment is currently $182.00 for each industrial use trip according to the Washington County TIF Ordinance. Using the above, the unmitigated impact of the proposal is as follows: Full Impact 21 x $537.50 = $ 11,907 Less TIF Assessment 21 x $172.00 = $ 3,822 Unmitigated Impact $ 8,085 Assuming completion of the half-street improvements on the remaining southern portion of the site frontage of 20 feet, project costs are $50 per lineal foot. Total project cost to the applicant is $1,000. Because the overall Arterial and Collector Street infrastructure traffic costs are partially unmitigated by the TIF Program, a total $7,085 remains an unmitigated traffic impact of this development. Therefore, the cost of completion of half street improvements along the project frontage is much less than the unmitigated project impact and can easily be required. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 4 OF 17 Use Classification: Section 18.68.030 lists manufacturing and wholesale, storage, and distribution as permitted uses in the I-P zone. The applicant is proposing to build a warehouse addition to an existing industrial building. The proposed floor plan would provide a future tenant with office and warehouse space which are permitted uses. Specific future tenants will have to be among those listed as permitted uses in the zoning district. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.68.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 25% landscaping. The site has a width of approximately 125 feet, thereby, exceeding the minimum lot width requirement. The total area of the site is approximately .64 acres. Of the total site acreage, the applicant is proposing to leave approximately 9,343 square feet, or 33% of the site for landscaping. The proposal, therefore, is providing landscape area that is in excess of the minimum required. Setbacks: Section 18.68.050 states that the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 35 feet and there is no side, or rear yard setback is required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The maximum permitted building height is 45 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the front yard setback is 35 feet. Side and rear yard setbacks are not applicable as the site does not abut a residential zone. The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of approximately 17 feet. This is well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of 1 tree for each 7 parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be 3 feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, a row of existing street trees will be preserved along the SW 85th Avenue frontage to provide screening. Based on their size, these plantings are expected to screen the parking lot and a roll up door from view of the adjoining right-of-way. Another proposed roll up loading door would not be visible from SW 85th Avenue. The applicant has also proposed to provide a 25 foot setback as measured from the edge of adjoining sidewalk. This setback will provide a buffer that is expected to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining street right-of-way. Because 27 parking spaces are proposed, a minimum of 4 parking lot trees are required. required. A total of 2 parking lot trees are proposed. For this reason, 2 additional parking lot trees shall be provided. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding 3 feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between 3 and 8 feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below 8 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 5 OF 17 along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these 2, 30-foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, vision clearance will be provided in accordance with this section. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(D)(2) requires a minimum of 1 parking space per 1000 square feet gross floor area within warehouse (plus 1 space per 700 square feet of patron serving area and 1 space per 200 square feet of office area) for Wholesaling, storage, and distribution. The applicant identified a total of 3,802 square feet ratio of warehouse square footage requiring 4 parking spaces. The applicant also indicated that 1,323 square feet of office is to be provided at a ratio of one space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area. Where office areas are developed with warehousing, the parking ratio is one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. For this reason, 7 additional parking spaces are required for the planned office area. A total of 11 parking spaces are required. The parking ratio for the proposed building floor plan is met because a total of 27 parking spaces will be provided. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that all parking areas shall be provided with disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and Federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 2 disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. The plan shows the provision of a total of 2 disabled parking spaces. These spaces as proposed, preliminarily satisfy this requirement. The Building Department will review these design details through the Building Permit Plan Check review process. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because a minimum of 11 parking spaces are required to serve this site, 1 bicycle parking space is required. The plan shows an area for bicycle parking but does not provide a bicycle parking rack design detail. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack detail that demonstrates that a minimum of 1 bicycle parking space is being provided. Off Street Loading: Section 18.106.080 requires that off-street loading spaces be provided for buildings in excess of 10,000 square feet. The total building square footage does not exceed 10,000 square feet, therefore, this requirement is not applicable. However, the applicant has provided two off-street loading spaces to serve the proposed expanded warehouse space. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses that require up to 100 parking spaces provide 1 access point with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This criteria is satisfied as the preliminary plan maintains the site's existing driveway to SW 85th Avenue. Proposed new parking spaces will also be served from the existing driveway on an adjoining property. For this reason, the applicant shall either record a joint access/maintenance agreement to ensure this access or provide proof of lot consolidation with the adjoining industrial property. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 6 OF 17 development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The proposed site plan shows the provision of a walkway connection from the main building entrance to SW 85th Avenue, thereby, satisfying this criteria. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan that indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The plans shows the location of a trash/recycling enclosure that complies with the service standard of the franchise hauler. The applicant included a letter from the franchise hauler to this effect. The enclosure's location complies with the City's visual clearance standards in terms of its location. Site Development Review -Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Chapter 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180(A).1. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The standards listed below are not found to be applicable because the proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.(A): (3) (Exterior Elevations), (5) (Privacy and Noise), (6) (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), (7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use),(8) (Open Space Dedication), (9) (Demarcation of Spaces), (12) (Public Transit), (17) (Signs) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A): This application is found to have elements related to the following subsections: (2) (Tree Removal), (4) (Buffering and Screening and Compatibility Between DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 7 OF 17 Adjoining Uses, (10) Crime Prevention and Safety), (11) (Access and Circulation), (13) (Parking), (14) (Landscaping), (15) (Drainage), (16) (Provisions for the handicapped), and (18) (Underlying Provisions of the Zone). These subsections are addressed immediately below or elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180(A).2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The proposed plan will retain all 5 existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. Three other trees under 12 inches in diameter will be removed. One of the three trees is needed to be removed to finish a required street frontage sidewalk. Two other trees numbered 5 and 6 may need to be removed to accommodate proposed parking spaces. It appears that both trees could be saved if 1-3 parking space were not built. The proposed parking lot would provide more than double the amount of required parking spaces, therefore, the applicant shall preserve or provide an arborist report for trees numbered 5 and 6. This report will need to state that they are not viable for preservation given the proposed disruption of the drip line area or their existing condition. If an arborist finds these trees to be unviable, the applicant has been required to provide 3 new parking lot trees that should then be considered to be of equal character. If the arborist report finds that they can be preserved, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to preserve these trees. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180(A).4 states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria is not applicable as this proposal does not abut a use that requires buffering in accordance with the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). Section 18.120.180(A).4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site plan, parking and storage areas shall be screened from adjoining properties. A mechanical equipment plan was not provided that demonstrates rooftop equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop or by the building parapet. The applicant shall provide a mechanical equipment screening plan that demonstrates that any rooftop mechanical equipment will be screened due to its location on the rooftop or by the building parapet. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a statement indicating that no new or existing mechanical equipment will be left unscreened as a result of the proposed site modifications. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180(A).10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and has requested revisions to the proposed security lighting plan. The requested revisions are reviewed within the Section VI. Staff Comments portion of this report. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 8 OF 17 Access: Section 18.120.180(A).11 requires that site access meet the minimum standards set forth in Section 18.108. Provisions for emergency vehicle access circulation shall be addressed. Provisions for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways shall be provided if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The site has been reviewed for compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108 elsewhere within this staff report. Emergency vehicle circulation access has been provided along two sides of the building. The Building Division has preliminarily reviewed this plan for Uniform Fire Code compliance. A detailed review and any required site modifications will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant has proposed to construct a sidewalk across the property frontage on SW 85th Avenue but no other pedestrian/bicycle ways are designated through this site. Parking: Section 18.120.180(A).13 requires that the standards of Section 18.106, the Clear Vision standards of Section 18.102 and the Access. Egress and Circulation standards of Section 18.108 be reviewed. These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.120.180(A).14 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Drainage: Section 18.120.180(A).15 requires that the applicant comply with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicants' preliminary drainage proposal and is discussed elsewhere within this report. Handicapped Accessibility Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).16 requires that the handicapped facilities be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 487 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. The provision for a handicapped accessible walkway route from the street, and handicapped accessible parking has preliminarily been reviewed within this report. A detailed review for compliance will be conducted prior to the issuance of building permits by the Building Division. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).18 requires that an application comply with the all other applicable standards of the provisions of the underlying zone shall apply. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Street Trees: Section 18.100.030 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The plan proposes to preserve 4 existing trees that are spaced from 15-28 feet on center. Due to their size, these species are considered large species and comply with spacing requirements. The applicant has also proposed to plant an additional 3" street tree of undetermined species type to be planted near the southern property line. Due to physical site constraints such as driveways, the 4 existing trees and 1 new tree comply with the spacing standard for a site with 125 feet of width as set forth in this section. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 9 OF 17 existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. The applicant has provided a plan that identified all existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. The applicant has not proposed to remove any of the 5 existing trees over 12 inches in diameter. Since the applicant is retaining 100% of the existing trees on site, Section 18.150.025(B)(2)(d) requires no mitigation. Signs: Section 18.114.130(F) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Development Services Technicians. PUBLIC FACILITIES STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 85th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street and is currently constructed to this standard. This street type is to be constructed within a 50-foot ROW. At present there is not 50 feet of ROW adjacent to this site. As a part of this application, the applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW to provide 25 feet from the centerline. The street has been improved adjacent to this site, so no additional improvements are necessary. Note No. 8 of the City's Transportation Plan Map indicates that this section of SW 85th Avenue may be considered for further expansion as a southern extension of Hall Boulevard to tie in with SW Boones Ferry Road in Tualatin. Should this occur, additional ROW to provide 45 feet from the centerline would be needed to accomplish this. In order to ensure that this expansion could be accommodated in the future, the applicant will be required to preserve the area equal to 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's plan appears to accommodate the 45 feet reserve area. The existing sidewalk meanders around some existing trees near the curb line. When the additional ROW is dedicated, there will still be portions of the sidewalk outside of the ROW. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate a sidewalk easement to cover those portions. WATER: The City of Tigard provides the water service in this area. The existing building is presently served from the water system. There does not appear to be a need for further water line work with this expansion. SANITARY SEWER: The site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. There does not appear to be a need for additional public sewer line work with this project. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 10 OF 17 STORM DRAINAGE: There is an existing on-site storm drainage system on this site. The building addition will result in additional impervious areas on this site, which will increase the storm water runoff. The applicant's engineer prepared a downstream analysis, which shows that the additional runoff of approximately 0.55 cubic feet per second (cfs) will be insignificant to the downstream system. Therefore, it is Staff's opinion that on-site detention is not necessary. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to provide a linear compost filter vault on-site to treat the storm water from this site. The applicant's engineer submitted a preliminary sizing calculation that indicates the vault can easily be accommodated on this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility, to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications, at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications of same. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been received. DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 11 OF 17 SECTION VI. STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department provided the following comments: Based on the size of the proposed addition, the need for additional lighting on the west and south side of the addition appear necessary. The plans presently allow for installation of 1 HPS exterior wall pack. This does not appear to provide adequate lighting. There is no reference to any proposed lighting on the south side of the structure as well. The City of Tigard Building Division provided the following comments: If the second proposed building exit is required by the occupant load the accessible path must lead to and connect with the public way. Separate permits are required for the proposed awnings. A Geo-Technical Report for liquefaction will be required. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING JANUARY 7, 1999 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY JANUARY 27, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1999 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. J� '� January 1999 PREPARED MarK Roberts DATE Associate Planner, AICP �" �'`'` January 7, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd.* DATE Planning Manag:, I:curpin\mj r\sdr\sd r98-17.dec DIRECTORS DECISION SDR 98-0017-DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PAGE 12 OF 17 • • ■ 1 w • Z O , r� Mfr J MS S.C.4 4,4 tae,...2/A-9 . - CB Iffibil•444*P.M G.rµfA•M 7- Frx,,........ i t-dal NT flR}VE-_______- "0.q Ib. 45-or I . . ai Z . . . . . . . . �' . . I z • { - 1: 5 Or HDDI150N / / 4�1 ! - -'. lirQ- .. �i *ilk - -- ---' —Mi cs�nt�iglr` �1 --- I M� • ,... pOyIlL 1 .w la M..c[ �i_ yA4 ..,".. _ .r.l.r ; , a 4 I V �n^^44.s..rr _ _JL'LT_LM44_ �� r"ej i �I 4, : 4 / ...1....„, iCi ' LL te fl a , i /!k —L_ ` ....A=re----------. �y{ � �_ ';M* • . — ---- r ..a.:-.--ii- � ~ ' _� 1/LS1� CITY of TIGARD ,: 1i111111u1 ==/1. ' •111111- I. ',T „ OE00NAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM•• . �.::.1 A _ MI . a VICINITY MAP a�� �����P*� •;� ��— 11111111111 �� ,UN111111 �■s�����A► ..�•. AA II 111111111 1 .•1„ 1111 ��� ■mo�� pow .111 : 11111 ► ,► �� ,;,�t ..^� 1 SDR 98-0017 mat AmIllhil DURHAM RD NA e DURHAM RD 1 � DURHAM/HALL III BUSINESS PARK MAJOR SUBJECT' MODIFICATION P uiiii1 ` PARCEL 1 min; � gill= < I li l' w I vii � z - 41141110* " 0 200 400 800 Feet 1" 488 feet _________________ AI, _.4.71). a A City of Tigard c Information on this map is for general location ony end a' should Ce verified wldl • the Development Services Division. ?s 13125 SW Hall Blvd V, _. Nerd.03 9171 I (503)839-4171 http:Ilwww.d.11pard.or.w Community Development Plot date: Nov 20, 1998;C:lmagic\MAGICO2.APR SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL B•ESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION lb PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT S • • 2S11380-00600 2S114A0-00100 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J 150 N 1ST AVE 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY HILLSBORO,OR 97123 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S114A0-01100 2 4A0-01101 BIRKEMEIER BRENT T/JANET D TRS UNIFIED • RAGE AGENCY 10573 SW NAEVE ST 150NFI•.T TIGARD,OR 97224 HILL :ORO,OR •' 3 2S114A0-01103 2S114A0-01104 U - -B ' ERAGE AGENCY COLUMBIA CABLE OF OREGON 150 N ' RS P O BOX 5630 HI SBORO,OR 9712 DENVER,CO 80217 John Boutinen Pacific American Property Exchange Engineered Structures, Inc. 2390 East Camelback Road, Suite 330 7360 SW Hunziker Street, Suite 101 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Tigard, OR 97223-2305 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 929$ BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising City of Tigard-Planning • Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Ha 11 Blvd . or s'i ga rd ,Oregon 97?.2.3 •• 0 Duplicate Affidavit SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDR]98-0017 >DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION< • approved, • The Director has a subject to conditions, a request for Site Accounts Payable sub j Development Review approval to add a 3,020 square foot building addi- tion to an existing industrial building.The site would also be added to an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue;WCTM 2S1140,Tax Lot 01104.This site is on the west side of SW 85th Avenue, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION south of SW Durham Road. ZONE: Industrial Park;I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public STATE OF OREGON, )ss support facilities;professional and administrative services; financial, in- COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) surance and real estate services;business support services;manufacturing I, Kathy Snyder of finished products;packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution,among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, Director, or his principal clerk, of thdfigard--T»r lati n ri';_nes 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at "'i cJa rd in the • _ 81■ • .i.- aforesaid county and state; that the C-;.:�,*' . �� �I111111 m _ —. "� I a Hall '3u,i nes s Park v,� own: . - ,-. kc-a == C _mss∎ a printed copy �• . 1 '. - = r,1101 p py of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ,� _ '�i�v ■ V —�,_. _a.t1�1. entire issue of said newspaper for pith successive and a nø S . Ir' ' a , 111111 consecutive in the following issues: ' ' *` --i I '•, btu 1_ January 7 . 1999 1 I IL . •i i�' KCCikir J12)r-) ■�i,lsl I: i '� isue.JE I PARCEL �.�5 �•+�••'- r�� —L;t I Subscribed and sworn tot fore me this7th day of :fa nu a r.y, 1999 ,, i - r — I Ii Not: Public for Oregon 1t1111� �I ,� ti111.1IH MII&I My Commission Expires: `4` :/ I l� � I I, AFFIDAVIT The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on January 20, 1999. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten(10)days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,January 20,1999. TT9298-Publish January 7, 1999. Iv,: .. sr mgt iiffiaw ass .__ a GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION^SYSTEM �. A'M8►,��� 11 :PAP 11011111111 •• ■, ■'+.e y ■ ' of �IHI HIIIIAV , .. . I - 11� • AREA NOTIFIED ali.fikii�ll /111011/ 1111111.1 .. m�� (250') DURHAM ■ . . RD DURHAM RD E.1 SDR 98-0017 _ III I [ 1 1111111 DURHAM/HALL IR'��=� .R BUSINESS PARK LIR1l 111113 �B00 MAJOR � � MODIFICATION %SA , , tri w t tI'��1I i1„ milli'" 1 a N I ? 400 600 Feet 1 507 feet 4 lib' ',rim. ��' IFAill City of Tigard �. 4) 9 ' Information on this map is for general location orlyr and • Ai, should be verified v+itll the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd ' 7,,,,,,\,, i Aik • �-WA T(503)63 9171 - 441t (503)6394171 ft �t� _ http./fwww.d.tipird of us Community Development Plot date:Nov 20, 1998;C:Imagic MAGICO2.APR major wto,d c al c l 4 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . . 4l APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: 13 , e' DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 16 2 ? „S(,t,) Sj Ave FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S 1 (I-A Ty �'� 1101- Case No.(s): ��/L / 6—6:70/ 7 Other Case No.(s : Site Size: a _ _ . - Receipt No.: 7 4' e"___:(;-, ,s� Application Accepted By: - ' - A-a ,/ 4.Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': ,,,,, .z_.�,- AWN! -• Date: 9-3,-)-- g Address: _ .1_ .► • o4 - p-(03 City: R, o,PA)t>. ,A-z. , Zip: Pc-c7(c Date Detecrnine To Be Complete: Applicant*: JriA,v r■I (A.ir_,CCto� al re5 f 1 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 7 D TTtu)zy - Phone: 76s 3(« L /_- P St.‘ 97Z23 f City: I (Gc r � �roL Zip: �j CIT Area: .5 a 4Pikl ' When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Rev.4/21/97 OGurplmrnasters\sdra.doc must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. UREUTE PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ ApplicationREQID S ElemenBMITts AL SubmittedELEM :NTS— G1 p Application Form 1 ccicy The owners �f record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to ail (please be specific): Owner's Signature/Written Authorizatiarr- r r / - Title Transfer Instrument or Deed I4, 3 CS Ore u.a N� � /�(raJ, g Site/Plot Plan C • b' (t(D ?CZ"L A.,5 �Cl� `( J-L.rs.y. (#of copies based on pre-app check list) / J / ' g Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 111‘..-_--:=1— 14. Rp a.tC� Q�Jck mat P�(SV l', c Applicant's Statement L4 4 �T (#of copies based on pre-app check list) — __:14,,j r fir aJ Construction Cgs '_ Vt.! i`o(rte ()St-- 0 USA Sewer Use Information Card l �Y (Distnbuted/completed at application submittal) S If 130 - � Filing Fee (Under$100 COO) S 800.00 A(5100.0004999 999) S1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) S1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: • APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does_not violate any deed restrictions that mav he attached to or imoos d utron the subject 12132.122 1t6 • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this Z day of v21 :7 ce 9 9,-9 1 • Stalk" 11111trf f"-7 cfc.,t1m; Owner's Signature • Sig ture 24`off c ` 1p Co 0-42 a s�y�e le. 2, i f Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 U9,-'3/98 10: 41 FAX 602 8815 WESTERN AMERICAN EXCHANG Z10U3 SEP 23 '93 1Q:31Ai 2E' INC. 503-968-6639 P.3 L.:zt any VARtANCEE, CONCITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, CR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to b• considered part of this application: d as • APPLICANTS: ro consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the ieacribed on the front of apg fcatian In the"Required SubertKta4 elements'box. 1a Cetati[ed SLbrnittel Requirement Information sheets be obtained upon Oo request,b�ail hpes of Land Use Aplicadaris.} �71E APPL1CANT(3) SHALL.CERTIFY THAT: . . , �� .-ot•a7•l• ,� as •.•• � ... \•- if 7te at:Omit= s granted. ate at:pbrint will mss!-ti'ti.richtsgrantarl'ff a ✓Henrys with the terms'and safest to all Ise=Litton* arts motions of Me approval, All of the above statements and tt;e statzmenis in Me plat plan, stta4tments, and te aFG3canta so a� and e�hs�artst�rttaed herewith; are aloe; any such sratarnan=are false fat Y permit ssu�, basset on this apFtEr�t:an, rt*ay be revoked 114 fiend that The appiimrst has nano the entice contents cf the application, InotutEng the pic t et and Ctarr.a, and understands t#e requirements fr.r approving or denying the epptication. SIGNATURES of owner of the subject property. CATE nag 23"e( day of Pacific American Property Exchange Corpernrion, a California corporation °Wiled hate media under EX.-7*-86.8 caner✓s Karlrt uR'ti owner's 3sg canons Signature CWiiers Sigrtatslr. • 09/23/98 WED 10:36 [TX/RI NO 62291 C2:1003 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that max be attached to or imaosed art the subject z?ro oerty. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and !"imitation of the approval. • • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the p tides and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of ugh owner of the subject property. DATED this 2 day of =in :41 c A 9 l F) • ma,1110 .611, Owner's Signature • et"' Si lure ct 61:k, ow/0 te-- i� O Gl cc� 2 cows pt. .,ko Co oT soy-e pe 2, p� Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 09/23/98 10:42 FAX 902 224 881 s «'ESTERN AMERICAN EXCHANG 004 PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTY EXCHANGE CORPORATION 2390 E. CAMELBACK ROAD, SUITE 330 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85016 602/224-8818 • 888/350-1031 • 602/224-8815 FAX September 23, 1998 The City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Design Review and Building Permit 16296 SW 85t' Avenue, Tigard, OR To Whom it May Concern: Pacific American Property Exchange Corporation, a California corporation, is currently under contract to purchase the real property which is the subject of the attached Application submitted by Engineered Structures, Inc.. We will be the owner of the property during the requested improvements. Engineered Structures, inc. is acting as our authorized representative for the purpose of filing for Site Design Review and Building Permit Application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at the number above. Sincerely, Karin A. Church Exchange Coordinator 2 •0 i a's" . 1100 m r S.7I Ac. * v 2E5 o d ,,,, 1104 z u O h 11 •6SA0. ••. a Q -, a na et 620 0 it '1' 1103 a a 0 a a 1101 5 .93Ac. •,ha so co at 1 $. e3 in RODS SEE 26O . 2S 1 1200 j54 Ac. • a O 0 1 APR, 23. 1993 1G 411611,$ ":'; _: 1rbiteName: Durham t� EXTiaili SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION • Legal Description of Property Saxon I/$tore Cab14 T.V. UO{1.brT A X parcel of land located in the No:Thecnt on.e-guartar of Section 14. .^ownship 2 South, gauge I Nest, of the uillanettA meridian. is Waahing`cn County, OCCgcf. Said pazeel of lead Doing a part of that parcel of. land eatsveyed to `SA N I•, a paemership consisting of P. J_ Schc£fler and C. Roger wiilett.e and recorded December 1, 1980 by Rua No. 80043887, record of dccds, Washington co.. ty, Oregon. Said rsarctl of land being more paxticularly doacribed as followni DrzLnsraC at ts• Nos:thenat corner of the Northeast one-quarter of Bald Section li f C'.SE+J;CC South along the £aatezly line of said scction 14, a d.actariCe of 677-2S fact; thence Seth 89' S4' 20' West parallel with the l{ortb.ray line of maid Section 14, a c:a;.xn...o of 15.00 feet to a point cn the Westerly ri at of vty line of SoetLerest :5th AVenu-. said. point bring the true point of beginning: hence C~a'_int ng South 89' S1' 20" welt:, parallel with the Hurtle=ly Use of said Section 14. a discs=..ce of 225.00 face; rhente Swath parallel with cad I:a.starly line of said Section 1., s Cloth:ace cf. 125.00 feet to tt mint as tha Sont`se:ly Line of wild 'SAXON T' property; thence North 89• 54' 27'=_.azt,' along said Southerly 1.thc, 22S_00 feet to S point oa the westerly right of wuy line of c ..id Sout`nrest 2f.th Nventes thence north along•Said westerly right of wax lirre 125.0 feet to the True Point of Sae'nncng. SCBJr-C: :0 an cane-moat for M!-.A purposes o, rerwi.g and perpet.n_l_ly roiitrining_ sanitary sever, water, and storm waxer collection._ Said east being Moro particularly dare:I-bed ar So Lloux: 3'c:,RNING tt the true point at Legit:Li.ng of the peeviot:_' deoc ibed pa..-.^..^i, raid point bring the tr.= pol:st c r, be7r SnnIn of the easement herein described3- thotce S tth along the Westeoly right-of-way LL nz of 85'..'i Avenue A distance Of 115.00 tQRII: thence South 89' 54' 20' 'Zest p ---'''el. with the:Nor}herly line of said ?aced, a distance of 29.00 feast: .thence North parallel •.i:h the.yesterly•right-of-way line of aril S.W.- 3Sth'A.rece. a diotarsce of 23.00 fact: thence Saud. 89' S<' 20` • Wiest parallel with the northerly Ana of mid above Parcel c ,"Este.nce Of 186.00 feet W tho Weatorly Line of said aLvme `pereol; rlrence 5orth along said Westerly line of Cald aboVn parcel. a distance of 19-00 feet: thence' North 89' 54!. 20,' =az eara3lel with the sortherty line ot,said above maraca. a dictanen of 195.00 fatty thence North pernllel utth the weletarly right-Of_ray;1 a of aaid s_w. aSth Xvosta a di3ta3cq of 73.00 feet to tea Northerly T e un of :aid =ore parcel; t:etce North E9` S{' ti I Z0' `tact; uoag •said northerly line of amid above parcel a distAncc,oZ 20.03 feet to tba s=ae point or beglaalog of the eascaant herein described. w,; I ARO F'JR 2Za SCBZI:CT TC an easement for serving end perpetually mnintaining an ordesgzrcnnd powarl:nct said easement e.ing 5.00 feet in '-dtt end rut Ing contlquovt CD mad along the Southerly boundary of the above - • described par_al. /111' SSLP L i".lair ( TCI 23 1393"i0:43Ari NORRIS STEVENS NO. P. 7 • w V, ErdIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 ewe to the Antenna Space Lease Agreement dated June. , 1993 between Columbia Cable of Oregon, as Lessor, and Interstate Mobilephone Company, dba cellular One, as Lessee. The propert y is legally described as follows: A parcel of land located in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 14, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in Washington County, Oregon. Said parcel of land being a part of that parcel of land conveyed to "Saxon I", a partnership consisting of F.J. Scheffler and C. Roger Willette and recorded December 2 , 1980 by Fee No 80043687 , Records of Deeds, Washington County, Oregon. Said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 14 ; thence South along the Easterly line of said Section 14 , a distance of 677 .25 feet; `hence South 89 " 54 ' 20" Hest parallel with the Northerly line of said Section 14, a distance of 15 . 00 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of Southwest 85th Avenue, said point being the true point of beginning; thence - continuing South 899 54 ' 20" West, parallel with the Northerly line of said Section 14, a distance of 225 . 00 feet; thence South parallel with the Easterly line of said Section 14, a distance of 125 . 00 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said "Saxon property; thence North 89 . 54 ' 20" East, along said Southerly line, 225 . 00 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of said Southwest 85th Avenue; thence North along said Westerly right of way line 125.0 feet, to the true point of beginning. Ant. J. ITJO 1U:44ADI .• Vlintlb bitql‘O • d I.. NO, RUI i'. 9 Cascade No.041A Site Name: Durham W 7-- EXHIBIT 2 DESCRIPTION OF CONDIUNICATIONS FACILITY i The"Communications Facility" consists of one antenna array,which consists of three (3) sectors containing up to four(4) antennas each,plus one(1) Global Positioning System Antenna. SSI2 will also. install up to five(5)self-contained equipment cabinets in an area approximately 10 ft.by 15 ft at the base of the existing tower. . . . . . ::....,. :. . . . . . . .. .. ,. •: . •,..re, . 14t‘A'''' ......L . .. . . ,. ... :,.. . ... ...41■7.!'-e.:: . ..ty.iit:'•'. - . . . 1 . A . -.• . - . •i .1 1 . ' 1 • • • .1 ; .; . SSLP Initials: TCI Initials: at . -. ...L.T-...3 c. • 1 - . • , . . .:• .....4...... • ._ :.......,,..•77,!27, ?.......t.!..-:,...7,-,:•ri.,r....-77-mx.lt....-.1..r,f•••-•••-• - - - • • - - • .. . . .... . • . .. -_. ._.. ... ..... . • I ii • N EXI5T. 11 I z g C� I 31i PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM AROUND GATCA SASH O _ _ AS SNOIM.IN DETAIL 2/A-5 I 0 ■ i------'-----ol-------O-JENNY-_,e.c�t= + -------------------- - pEOISTNS P9JICE ` . • • AGCE551BLE I a t ROVTE NO.I AGGEY�IELE E*� .. ! ‘ : - -- - - 4P■ °EXISTING S'-0' V 3 ; • .r •b - HIDE 5OEJNALK S■ •' F`. - = ,� - ..- �1 CxL�INf STRUT Y •I " " " • " ' / ' , 4°.77/ IMMIMAIM11111M1 •••.•. . -1 (-3 ..,r II _ -, o PFZOPOSED / , : �I -cwlc soeMA�K .1 •-• •' '. g• o / /�, Ili '�' a ADDITION '/ .// / / �� 1`� I� i- ∎53 1 �� /�I�r PN PSLO�R•lbea' i fXljryMd' e been '•� Q ewer/ i. � I•% //� . ' '-^ I I I� I I�i W Ii•_ • •'!3"245,5E --• II� ,.rr .' / . Z al •111111R1 i ar_ilY �/IN/I iy IY.�,//////\////w/�:- - - LJ 1 •8 / ' MAIL•!O '' Nric1102 *.K,r7.- -3 ���_ Ay/MyT ♦/ 4EW ASPHALT ASIMALT _� a I 1.�s�LISTING � P GATE ! d--_ __ r f1W1se_ UTILITY EAST•OIT _\ -Avis". .AVINQy 3�I 1 \ ►Nw V n 4.. / e0111LE GATE W D _I <14:2) - 8 p EXISTING STREET eli I ;. h ILL-••'' - -'--490,.. . I .O�.C� $ICI+ De - A:_x. MICE, x Z : fl- : . . ��OGA-EXISTING S 5M•5••20 w PI.• _I PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL J PE..E A5 SHOrM SYSTEM AROUND UTCNI BANN .( Q 1 AS 9NIprM iN OCTANE 2/A-5 �l 1` TREE LEGEND ISIT SUMMARY `TEMORARY SEDIMENT MENGE v AS SNOHN IN DETAIL 3/A-5 P . STATUS 1 SIZE DESCRIPTION SITE USAGC I II) L_ i - EXISTING TO REMAIN I IF 'NORSE GM�TWr TREE EXISTING WILDING POOT PRINT• 2p65 SP. 1.9% I Q 4)0_ 0 • ' MEM PLG TO REMAIN IS' NORSE GIT_RMIl D Nw euBALD FOOT PRINT• 306O SP. IG.Re III S I TE DE�/ELOPMENT PLAN N I _ IO.1 PLANTING 2• TO 9E 7ETERNIN, TOTAI.BALDING FOOT PRAM• 5123 SP. Ie7f1 +� $ EXISTS&TO SE REMOVED T (j PAM-� EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA• !UPS 5P. 5,.•� I SCALE,I'•2O'-0• D 4) 6 EXISTING TO BE REMOVED e• PIIC-R= MEM IT'^•ERVIDUS AREA' 165A S.P. 2T.NU III, Revised: 9/29/98 (n Z IS) - I Merl PLANTING 5• APPROV•�ST>ZET'�= TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA• I5.T52 5P. 66D% •III „�� EXISTING TO 9"REMOULD I O' PEAR R. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA• P343 S.F. 33.2% , Destroy All Previous Pions mro r se • ' I EXISTING TO REMAIN -WEE I '� �' ACID' PARKINS THESE DR+wINCS ARC THE PROPERTY OF I _•� ... I EXISTING TO REMAIN I T `DEGID•.q/5-REM I ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc.+0•RE N STANDARD PARKINS SPACES• 23 NOT O BE SED:Al PROO UCED IN+ ^C ti• I •� - EXISTING TO REMAIN Zr 1 `PINE�° , COMPACT PARKINS SPAC°3• 2 I'ZNER. EXCEPT:IT THE RIOR WRITTEN III — EXISTING TO REMAIN 16• DECIDJOUS'q- _ ADA ACCESSASLE PARKINS SPACES• 2 1 PERMISSION OF ENGINEERED STRUCTURES I I 1 NEW PUNTING I 13/4''7005.1 DETER.. INED TOTAL PARKING SPACES• 21 A-2 ANDERSON & DITTMAN NU. blJb F . 2 02 { RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGRzimaNT This reciprocal access agreement is made this day of September, 1998 , between BRENT BIRKEMEIER and JAN BIRKEMEIER, husband and wife, hereafter referred to as "8&J, " and BRENT BIRKEMEIER, hereinafter referred to as "Brent . " WHEREAS, B&J are the owners of tax lot 1100 on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, in Washington County, Oregon; and WHEREAS, Brent is or will be the owner of tax lot 1104 on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, in Washington County, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the parties each desire to obtain permission for access across each other' s existing driveways for ingress and egress to their respective properties; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by the parties hereto that : 1 . Each of the parties hereby grants unto the other party, their heirs and assigns, a revocable permit for ingress and egress, upon, over and across the paved driveway areas now existing or hereafter created on their respective properties described as tax lots 1100 and 1104 on Exhibit A attached hereto. 2 . The permits hereby granted shall allow access by the respective parties, their tenants, visitors, customers and employees, shall specifically exclude any use for parking and loading or unloading, and shall be subject to such written rules that parties agree upon, which rules each party agrees to enforce regarding that party' s property and tenants. 3 . This agreement does not grant any rights or benefits to third parties or to any tenant or subtenants of either party and is solely for the benefit of Brent and B&J. 3 . The permit granted by each party hereto may be cancelled upon 60 days' written notice to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove written. B&J: BRENT: Brent Birkemeier Brent Birkemeier Jan Birkemeier Page 1 - RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENT rig,uci, a. Maui; a•uon1r15153611YVa1aD J1GYrLl) ANDERSON & DITTMAN NO. 6136 FP. 3 03 3-E MAP 23 1 i rco I I 12 i i [,.. f\ Ste Ste' T.4 ~ DURHAM T . . 'ROAD eA •a• ; , sI , , (-- 14 • 13 ritM iCN00t E msrRrcr 18✓ R • • fit f. a • ii:1:1 l — saar coos r see — 1100 N u Ilii • . • H0' • - • I 1103 : ; • • • 1 J.l_. . t I i Ile ~ .1*! 01145' I �— '•[ I ! _ • • H _ 23-7:4 SEE MA►r+;i •oee � �e _ � 1200 2 S I 13 4 aM Oa 3 •▪ • 1 `. •J w a a I. • FOR AM 111 PUNPOSE3 . . . 00 110t NI • FOR ANY SEE MO I 2$ 1 10al0 I •.e.oe • • a• .s r s re sole ilk& • •,‘ i. /L• •• . • 1 THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A COURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY rht.F•71,to Tt4 TOMMY for t+•purpo••at gestating in wcadnq said Atoms.s, aro Ins C•mptiiy%m n+et P.e.li.CtItty forvInIt16AI. if say, in dimensions, iyMS,and Minions asCiiftsined by actuall sw ,y. • E)GiI B I T A Page 1 of 1 ...v V • ;CHMII ' SANITARY SERVIC INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Drop Box Service Established in 1948 9-2 Engi n, ; Kd Structures ATTN : thn Boutinen Per hone conversation about Solidwaste and Recycling encl !s at the Durham Hall Business Center. The enclosure will q our need of accessability in providing said services. Plea :. !d "NO PARKING" signs around the enclosure. Thakit Jag. A II CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 3/18/99 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0017 FILE TITLE: DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Pacific American Property Exchange ESI 2390 East Camelback Road, Ste. 330 7360 SW Hunziker Street, Suite 101 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Tigard, OR 97223-2305 (602) 224-8818 (503) 968-3118 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to construct a 3,020 square foot addition and add parking to incorporate an existing industrial building into an adjoining industrial park. LOCATION: 16295 SW 85th Avenue; WCTM 2S114A0, Tax Lot 01104. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. The Industrial Park Zoning District allows public agency administrative services; public support facilities; professional and administrative services; financial, insurance, and real estate services; business support services; manufacturing of finished products; packaging and processing; wholesale; storage; and distribution, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.68, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: THURSDAY DECEMBER 3,1998 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: THURSDAY JANUARY),1999 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION K VICINITY MAP K LANDSCAPING PLAN K NARRATIVE K SITE PLAN K ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARBORIST REPORT OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 SDR 98-0017 DURHAM/HALL BUSINESS PARK MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 44. __Ii.....„11 October 12, 1998 CITY OF 7O7 OREGON John Boutinen ESI 7360 SW Hunziker Street, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223-2305 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/Durham Hall Business Park Site Development Review Major Modification/SDR 98-0017 Dear Mr. Boutinen: This letter is in response to your recent Site Development Review/Major Modification application. This application has been considered to be incomplete pending the submission of the following additional information: 1 . A downstream analysis performed by a Professional Engineer; and 2. A statement of justification for the use of a fee in-lieu of a Water Quality Treatment Facility. Also, this issue can likely be addressed as a condition of development but we will probably require that the proposed trash and recycling enclosure to be relocated. As proposed, the enclosure appears to be within a "Clear Vision Area" at the intersection of the proposed one-way driveway and an existing driveway serving the industrial park. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information if you have any questions at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, . 4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is\curpin\markr\letters\boutin.doc c: SDR 98-0017 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 �� STRUCr SDR APPLICATION FOR 16295 SW P ` 4 :•_t!, 85TH AVENUE IN TIGARD, OREGON W � S APPLICATION CONTENTS 'be cossl* (1) Check for $1,600.00 Design •Construction •Export (1) Site Development Review Application. (1) Copy of page 2 of the application with owner signature. (1) Letter of authorization from the new owner. (1) Plot map with deed information. (1) 8-1/2" x 11" reduced copy of the Site Development Plan. (1) Copy of the Reciprocal Access Agreement with plot map. (1) Copy of the solid waste hauler's approval letter. (1) Copy of the attendance list from the public meeting. General Contractor (20) Copies of the project narrative attached to the + Pacific Northwest drawings. (20) Sets of the drawings including A-1 (Existing • Hawaii Site Plan), A-2 (Site Development Plan), A-3 (Site • Pacific Rim Details), A-4 (Floor Plan) A-5 (Elevations) and a vicinity map with the site, streets, transit stops and zoning districts noted. Owner's representative —John Boutinen Engineered Structures, Inc. Phone 968-3118 Fax 968-6639 7360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 Phone: 503.968.3118 Fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esi@esiww.cam fir Web Site: www.esiww.com .-•_...._.._. ((81103613 rwnrta+eeel ,IpAgragrrt plum mar eb inner: eerla �� OR%SS Lma+dPeb roayssomp u4sa m ••r't pr r•rlsre ammo res rum ma 'aufertTasti moon pew 'r~tioq ,•ssamraa.4i6 '0,10.14 sign pe '•felt& sup 't 'foaiwQs rrarawrairopo 03,1 trge..st eYs Cl =soling es eiee Maces aNw oseet OtIFTIM 141 to ra1e0p0 s V10110 r.rt AZAVOeel worete I 'T -Driest mg A= s,t townie's' trr ,pprrrcae avow emir::iurrg =TOP 04 airsc e' eR its eR1 s0a ee>aneq Trot s►aamSAsis ot1M aetwu see .21C men Ct. =TO /gns121_AE morn trlawroemew ez Masse soma. CI 'w;yletaeR as eerorat vee.ergt sin 'AMA 2plIJ ttws.A) eq7 fininitta't eves '; rimRR 'ee_egreDrer Ie 0141 lS £geergtysd •f'iL ►gleseti i mam:pop e+l1wzsee erg, srerKZ i.e se sttTe[ slum en we M.T can » AtatronY pm amt. owes troesgl !found* ems' toammail Pete Ii erss Rem lo oetbsa ATrigvM isle foe attTrd t of 20.? vo'ste 'MT/ Atwtt7Ni MTV 'agA per on see mum' ammo 142apesrd .T mom. Imo Ie eel; Ayeetisame en we mad • x awt 20.511 so grsocom s 'et Ya'1es.a ne• Be n/ ivoirsomi pro {rata TeTTeslef new S % 1 'aeop 00'4t: Wu menmei9 a 'et Oitiim! Re* to ovv; xt ap owe Rate *tortoise 'seems .or .st .ct wog ptteee=awep ssvae40 Paor=7Voq )O agreed *11.71 oil *Woe mRmrS Oleo •m+/anr own »leepo le se ea:t Ats. ;10 elan w =Imo a as wen ce.s t so rooerartry a 'PI •wCZ0416 P1eo fa WTI t i s ettON etlt1 Slim rhea seep .DC ..g At vomit soa.lta :esaf 11e'41.! 7s assraevo .o; ammo ptw se sell' dtar.esA ea% verow eanae aaomett '►1 wirsaes WIN JO art01111041. 1111ev152= [R@ 315 Se1266 5ew43/gr awe we swdssztisg repo 105 is a twoovoF OttOem,ttia we east ersta poet to meld ;ern 'ooll.ao •R'tarcc emeeorwr 'sew ae *maw 'Llfigaoe 'eqt ewe e.arpamq A eta 1f ieelre.o Y4pmaw rum emartliol Aermegi e°+ reweave •t'4 V° ° anna* atyetsrr'aree e '.1 emef. es geWlegelev Pa'! so Tam meth 7e tided a erma net to !WW1 vier 'Ocean go meows Ca! veveaTsr;reg Io 411.0e0 eaa ei 'oeTpt'A saaw'LLTp Mil se amp ! orpORI1 c dTtpee'at 'el imams so aaaasaAb.00o 0ee1900114 Pill Sri Man NEVI Pi "GM t Tteutot =was oat ATTsvTSTradc PO same* .moaemmonas )o w47 '401 fr as AMINO 'UMW; to ISM etes of AwatelLowl 1o.$ 1leRstmre e.s.ettw •va ' 1O 'glt.og— •ae a segoaf emus 4rtto•mmosui e>!IrTgo el 'rosesemdsot eTeamRt17 • 'ao:2l110e5SZI COQ 1.12=01W BYiSieTR ZW2:0 1 ftwo efe pot &wave 'amain 'veleta ism rmiPap me -Pere 'A 4 *MD osar I lTM ea tied OT .sneie"•r3Ke 'tvotelteodam woody we ' avl 'ie•!!rA Plates Voi OD T3i W@M fdet:soetp !Attest/OT 114'6! Peent taeq Apltiti SOO t 'Old r.rz 6.11 08t}��j!AcISO:LI 13 teen so ring; 'sgQeeowe CoLSO Ci[ Jai as sae ee wort 111011113W ems► 'CBdeenbsw 8i somm T It4411 1105, VT Javumemt Ctrl "Pt e/eq=ewrp 'a *;et iltt'ii!�l EId uos Owe regee a eo.ve.s Ast+awmrd o•ptimow ai;raee oua '0111Taee201 1210w oiff ECU H 0 resa zas0s se:e0 43A eeita'et Nosiii? s• vs0e0LEti09 PV1'?I0l speNtereet! e0t to/Ot e811Vcl •CCM 16t CO3 ?11i1 100340 9fiQ 1!ii5 6599-896-E0S °ONI 'IS3 WdSO:VO 86, 02 AON — - — NOV 20 '98 04:05PM ESI, INC., 5L1 9h8-rb_9 AAQA F.-2)3/01)3 • qr- py: ORE30N TITLE 503 2g7 9033; 10!21/98 1' 10P16;jjTai 0.861-1 ;Page 3/3 10/21 10145 ►►ka ••:01:20.344 .� J wun 1'I aaa•iv�al, /OA Low fin 01169 P 9V,1 �ae�t�= O12GON yy• e� toN @ ooa • I . . • ., . Paso a magi/wad t. lwee,earlsa loses, lbe1n43 cal, seer sad itaoK.loaa 042.4ef, aad ruck ether meopetem as my wait saaawgr Wa oaaria,atlaw of 02•04%0441 ,aae, a amadiai,aa of Idea rant Iimasaeg , lay a7, 18M as eaeavdc'a e.o is. 370483!3 Loma mead : aartt 3. 13811 Lamer I81 : It's Cada ate apart Cbapassciar aaa atlLllita8 Lasae Cal : 84Pslat 0pwesfn 10, 4 24110•+. alai Sal iaasaaa'.aap 21464 true t,ral4altLaa tar Mao aaaaalasa„ as 3u11.4oa.ae. =ZS Atiessatatr Ma spf Waft WO tr I'm rums= vassascs. a! assn Zsalaasszs a vsaLNIISS 011 11,4201 di aan vas%ass ass vossamss. mess ___ as aasupCS1M !!far =Aft/. to f08a Je»ii310 Na a8ia al m char t id= Ma= NM flat adealdatea WT!at Plow minima iea11m a in "um btgraO asps if$ *O dialada ame MVP as mamma +same Lan= ea MOM fMCIsrd y Assam as area passe. Maui siiea _agg my aai Q,raaor, 88.8. 742 C P WaLla to 'RLL <. 1m., op awl easfleitloaa 11Y+ `tsi.., gyro ' MOLTS ® ate. =Ms a► saeassawgiree, sae :aaasssi Lvaa9nwC vim ad'aV/Iaareag ba8oati as cario ]jam,by m[ +Ludo. 1.31+1. 1ty M4:tsar risrnay, sa . of » os 7Ufs1.Ra1 r. rn ., a aariwa•a4l,ee, a WA t o Ma a ri.aaeiau. u — Wimpy Pablo. goa aaam�y e omma>saa , 1/1.2 swga lir.i> ca 3 . . ______ 10/21/88 w® 12:03 (TX/R1 NO 66511 Zoe: • ' - " NOV 20 '98 04:06PM ESI, INC. 503-968-6639 P.3 :1.. .. ..' "....... .117,....,:". . T7L. E • . - r i w,r MI IMP 1 :� Ti E il il ,... . -.... r.-...-..--.. • il 7. _ .... 47 _ M. El 23-x4 _t rs .•.,4 h, ,u 1 t•f r us- 4i1-.. _ ....._ • •••••• •rwl_I IVO Of I •UP fW Op r GB ow Iltaii.s■ . A M t i,1••{ 1I t .r \ 1A.. •WAS l- . �19 I /OW>a• • Y^_ 1— V K,;. T14A*0 ■ U 1 141 1 I 1 1 i wRGLwIl 1I ilk iNaURRANCi. •• N Tlis Print Is mauc soleiv tot In`; 1 purpose Of assigino in Ioc tin4 mi.. i 3-3 ....ultra property I �.I 1 o,rpany assumes no I1a0iIIt' I •v.Ciati:ms, if any, wnich may ?1b •1'.•.n 4ifibtj iiy :•'tua) !+array. I 1 "'"' 1 i Prop' sal /NarY'aT1ve ti September 24, 1998 ♦° sTao�r M S �- Site Design Review Application for 16295 S.W. 85th Avenue. • ES, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT sr...4,1/ The proposed development includes a 3,020 square foot expansion to the existing building along with the addition of 18 parking spaces, improved vehicle access/egress, extension of the public sidewalk, Design • Construction • Export relocation of some existing fencing, building access improvements, modification and improvement to the landscaping. The existing building and grounds are in need of maintenance. The new purchaser of the property (TL 1104) has entered into a reciprocal access agreement with the owners of the Durham Hall Business Center (TL 1100) to allow egress from the west side of the site onto the existing commercial driveway. PROPOSED USE The building will be leased to tenants for any use allowed by the City of Tigard I-P zoning. The uses will be compatible with the use of the adjacent Durham Hall Business Park and there were not any comments from the affected neighbors or any members of the Tigard Community Involvement Teams which were contacted for the Public General Contractor Meeting held on September 16th, 1998. • Pacific Northwest CODE CRITERIA • Hawaii 18.100 Landscaping and Screening The proposed landscaping will exceed the 25% area requirements of • Pacific Rim the IP District. The existing landscape irrigation system will remain and be modified to allow for site modifications. The site plan illustrates the landscaping modifications and improvements. The improvements include (1) new street tree, (2) new parking lot trees and the removal of (2) poorly maintained pine trees. The new trees on site shall have a minimum caliper of 2", (measured 4' in height) and the new street trees shall have minimum caliper of 3". Blackberry bushes which have overgrown part of the site will be removed for restoration of the existing landscaping and the new building footprint.. An erosion control plan in compliance with the Unified Sewer Agency requirements will be submitted with the building permit application. The remaining existing landscaping will be renovated and maintained. The new solid waste and recycling enclosure shall be screened by a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 7360 SW Hunziker#101 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas Tigard,OR 97223-2305 The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway and enter into a Phone: 503.968.3118 Reciprocal Access Agreement (copy attached) with the Durham Hall Business Center (TL 1100) located just north of the site. The Visual Fox: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esi©esiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com ....,........., ((80103613 Clearance Area requirements have been considered the proposed `* *TRU*? .� N.N. improvements to the site. 18.106 Off Street Parking and Loading The Site Development Plan allows for the required off street parking and loading to meet or exceed the requirements of Chapter 18.106, as 4'o• .000'4 per the following calculations. Warehouse and storage area = 3,802 sq. ft. at 1 space per 1000 sq. Design • Construction • Export ft. = 4 spaces required. Administrative office area = 1,323 sq. ft. at 1 space per 350 sq. ft. = 4 spaces required. Total Proposed Parking Spaces = 27 plus the loading zone. ****A new bicycle rack is included with the proposed project. 18.108 Access, Egress and Circulation The proposed Site Development Plan allows for the required access, egress and circulation for the public and for the fire department access and conforms with requirements of Chapter 18.108. (A copy of the - reciprocal access agreement with the adjoining site is included.) 18.114Signs The proposed project doesn't include any new commercial signs. The General Contractor required signage will be installed for the ADA accessible parking • Pacific Northwest spaces and a no parking sign will be installed on the trash enclosure gate. • Hawaii 18.116 Mixed Solid Waste • Pacific Rim The local franchised hauler ((Schmidt Sanitary Service, Inc.) has reviewed the site plan and approved the enclosure as shown on drawing A-1.1. (A copy of their letter is included with the application.) The enclosure will be screened with a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 18.120 Site Development Review The applicant has completed the Pre-Application Conference (8/18/98) and the required Neighborhood Meeting (9/17/98) as required prior to the Site Development Review Application. The application includes the existing site plan and the Site Development Plan along with the preliminary architectural floor plan and building elevations. Please contact John Boutinen at Engineered Structures, Inc (968-3118) regarding any questions on the proposed project. 7360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 18.168 I-P Industrial Park District The proposal is consistent with the allowable uses and requirements of Phone: 503.968.3118 the I P District. Fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esi®esiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com ((B#103613 IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT woo STRucro `�• „ �,� Air Quality —The possible increase in vehicular traffic will have A:41 � ' a slight (Insignificant) impact on the local air quality. To mitigate this, ESI occupants and users of the building may select to walk, bicycle, car pool or ride TriMet. 9`��IPi, <0 ���i� c �'•F COMStwJ Water Quality —The storm water run off will increase due to the increase in impervious area on the under-developed site. The Design •Construction • Export additional storm water from the new parking and circulation areas will be collected on the site as required by the City of Tigard standards and the Unified Sewerage Agency requirements. The additional rain water from the new roof area will be collected and piped to the existing storm sewer. A down stream analysis of the storm water collection system will be performed by a Professional Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. The applicant intends to request to pay the "fee in lieu" of providing an on-site storm water facility due to the nature of the small site. Traffic — The proposed project will result in a minor increase in daily vehicle trips to and from this site. Based upon the use of the adjoining Durham Hall Business Center, the proposed project will generate between 8 and 21 additional vehicle trips per business day. This will General Contractor have an insignificant impact on S.W 85th Avenue or Durham Road. • Pacific Northwest Pedestrian Access • Hawaii Public sidewalks exist on both sides of SW Durham Road and SW Hall Blvd. Public sidewalks exist on the east side of SW 85th and for 105' of • Pacific Rim the frontage on the west side of the street. The public sidewalk will be extended to the south property line as part of the proposed project. Light and Glare The proposed facility will include (1) additional HPS exterior wall Pack on the west end of the building. This will replace (1) or more older mercury vapor or incandescent exterior fixtures, which were previously located on the building. The exterior lighting will comply with the City of Tigard standards for outdoor lighting and the impact to the surrounding industrial properties will be insignificant. Public Services The site is currently served with public water, sewer, storm sewer, telephone, cable television and natural gas. The proposed 7360 SW Hunziker#101 improvements will be served by the same service providers. The site Tigard,OR 97223-2305 is currently protected by the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and the City of Tigard Police Department. (An existing fire hydrant is within Phone: 503.968.3118 250' of all portions of the existing building and the proposed addition.) The proposed building addition will not require any increase in the level fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esiigesiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com ............,,,. ((8#103613 of service required for police and fire protection. Public transportation srnuc �,' is provided at the intersection of SW Hall and Avon Road by Tri-Met a:41�:�' route 76 and the public agency is actively encouraging additional • ESI ) ridership. to,■Tiosi Ij 4.'OF COMStP Design • Construction • Export General Contractor • Pacific Northwest • Hawaii • Pacific Rim 1360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 Phone: 503.968.3118 Fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esi©esiww.com •;/'!�� Web Site: www.esiww.com ..,>.,.,..,..,,. ((8*103613 (471 Rea e 26,/ :■e7/22y IJOKA('S NI-XTZ.\)1A5) ?PN9-C1(;37 Aa I ,5 />3 Sly; it/erAece- Eit45_cw_RengS CfnrIrrs_L T6g-30f A,12frritiA.1" /05 73 SedAhtge.le Si-, 6 S?-/?6, acs -6 e $3671-3±Alc (-2f-64-Res t-Kie k c,„) sDie.q g-rte AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, Brent Birkemeier , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed building addition affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 16295 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, OR Tax Map 2S114A0 TL1104 and did on the 31st day of August 19 98 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a site development permit application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 16295 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, OR (state location you posted notice operty) Signature ( the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the a day of , 19 ?Y 6 � ►�, OFFICIAL SEAL f / j 1:,`"V.1 ELIZABETH L JUAREZ 4;;/i .�_1 / NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ?, --� `a+�� ��i �/ COMMISSION N0.052099 N o TA;'Y PUBLIC 0 �'E f MY COMMISSION EXPIRE APR.16 20Dy ... -, . My •mmission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 1 NAME OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NAME: .Birkemeier Building Addition TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 3,060 sq ft addition and parking changes Name of Applicant/Owner.. Rrnnr Jane t- Birkemeier Address or General Location of Subject Property: 16295 Sw 85th Ave. Ti.gard• OR LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2S 1 14A0 TL 1 104 h:'Jog 1patyYnastervatf post^Si AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Catherine Speight , being duly sworn, depose and say that on September 2 , 19 98 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 16295 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, OR a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Lake Oswego / Lake Grove with postage prepaid thereon. Signature .. (In the pr senc of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) N1) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ° day of --W7 E-a L Lf2T 19 48 :� ', OFFICIAL SEAL i 3 ELIZABETH L JUAREZ 4 i 0,0. -,■10 NOTARYPUBLIC-OREGON P NIP A' PUBLIC OF OR. e. COMMISSION NO.052099 N. MY COMM16810N EXPIRES APR.16,2000 / M •• mission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Birkemeier Building 73aition TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 3,060 sq ft addition and parking changes Name ofApplicant/Owner: Brent & Janet Birkemeier Address or General Location of Subject Property: 16295 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, OR LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 2 S 1 14A0 TL 1 104 I Wgallpatty mastervartmad.mst a ESI !•W n `'•,� .0•01"40 o,,,<1"° September 1, 1998 Design •Construction •Export RE: Birkemeier Building Addition Dear Interested Party: Engineered Structures Inc. is representing the owner of the property located at 16295 SW 85th Ave, Tigard, Oregon, Tax Map 2S114A0 TL1104. We are considering proposing a 3,060 square foot addition and parking changes requiring a Site Development Review. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: General Contractor September 16, 1998 Engineered Structures, Inc. • Pacific Northwest 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 • Hawaii • Pacific Rim Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-968-3118 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John Boutinen Project Manager ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. 7360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 Phone: 503.968.3118 Fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esiaesiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com .. CCP103613 )regon Title/Washington (OR) kI Owner : Birkerneier Brent T&Janet D Trs Parcel • R0517391 Site : 1628 SW 85th Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : 04/21/97 Mail : 10573 SW Naeve St Tigard Or 97224 Price : $3,000,000 Use . 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvcment,Ind Zone MktTot : $1,483,960 Legal : ACRES 3.74 97-98 Taxes : $22,259.56 Telephone : Census : Tract : 308.02 mock : 2 MapGrid: 685 Fl Real* : 2S114A0 01100 Bedrn: Bth : YB : Gar: Pool• BldgSF: Ac : 3.74 #2 Owner : Unified Sewerage Agency Parcel : R0517408 Site : 16375 SW 85th Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : Mail : 150 S 1st Ave Hillsboro Or 97123 Price Use . 9492 Misc,Unified Sewerage Agency MktTot Legal : ACRES.93, NON-ASSESSABLE 97-98 Taxes : Telephone : Census : Tract . 308.02 Flock : 2 MapGrid: 685 F1 RefParii : 2S114A0 01101 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: . Pool: BldgSF: Ac . .93 #3 - Owner : Columbia Cable Of Oregon Parcel : R1268764 J Site : 16295 SW 85th Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : Mail : PO Box 5630 Denver Co 80217 Price • $113,256 Use : 9842 Misc,Private Exempt Org,Leased MktTot Legal :ACRES .65,NON-ASSESSABLE 97-98 Taxes : Telephone Census : Tract : 308.02 Block : 2 MapGrid• 685 Fl RefParti : 2S114A0 01104 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: :3c: .65 4.'r'' Cal.- ► °^11 /11/'`f s 1 ,,,s �^��5 t The Informattan Provided is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS [CIT'S) NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT r Abdullah Alkadi Clark G.Zeller Beverly Froude - ``Craig Hopkins Jack Bielhan 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain RoadV.17430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 524-1068 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F. Mahon John Bennett) 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109111 Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 •,Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 524-6325 (503) 524-4550 (503)639-0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters Pat Wyden 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive , 11386 SW Ironwood Loop , ,15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 s Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 524-5200 (503) 590-1970/(503)624-8009 (503)620-7662 , Ed Howden Barbara Sattler Scott Russell Sue Rorman 11829 SW Morning 1511 ,11245 SW Morgen Court ,31291 Raymond Creek Road `` 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose,OR 97056 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 524-6040 (503)684-9303 (503) 543-2434 Bonne&Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive, `,15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard, OR 97224 '''Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 590-0461 (503) 590-0523 (503) 590-4297 Karl Swanson . 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 590-3369 :'LEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings l on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. n lbgimpa El ymu ftc,Slr❑notlr omit 1I Mar 97