Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1998-00010
SDR98 - 0001O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW LORI 98-0010 T ''' CITY OF TIGARD NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONOPOLE TOWER Community(Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 1/2/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER Site Development Review SDR 98-0010 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 100-foot monopole tower, mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top of the tower for an overall height of 115 feet. Future microwave antennas are also proposed to be located on the tower. Related equipment for this tower would be located within an existing adjoining storage unit. A six-foot-high chain link fence would surround the lease area. APPLICANT: D. Garvey Corporation OWNER: Burnham Business & Storage Ryan Young, Project Manager 9490 SW Barbur Blvd., S-200 10101 SW Barbur Blvd., S-207 Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97219 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham Street; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02200; and 2S102DB Tax Lot 00200. The communications facility is proposed within an approximately 640 square foot lease area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 1 OF 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Engineering Division (503) 639-4171.) 1. The tower shall be constructed of a non-reflective surface and neutral color. The applicant shall indicate the surface material type and color of the tower. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 2. All site improvement shall be installed and maintained as approved, pursuant to the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The Burnham Storage and Business center was developed under Conditional Use Permit (CU) 2-74 and Site Development Review (SDR) 4-74. Since its development, several business uses have applied for Conditional Use Permits to allow operation within the center. Vicinity Information: The site is adjoined by a pedestrian/bicycle pathway and Fanno Creek to the west, the City Water Department storage area and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Fire Station to the east. The site is adjoined by the City of Tigard Public Works Building to the north. To the south the property is adjoined by the GTE Administrative and Service uses. All adjoining properties have a zoning designation of Central Business District. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently developed with the Burnham Business and Storage Use. The site is generally level with a portion of the westerly section of the site sloping slightly towards Fanno Creek. The applicant has proposed to lease a portion of the property and develop a 100-foot tall wireless communications tower with 3 omni-directional "whip" antennas of 15 feet in height. The lease area would be enclosed within a six-foot-high chain link fence. Related equipment to serve this antenna would be located within an adjoining tenant space of the existing storage and business park use. The site would obtain access via an existing accessway that was developed to serve the business and storage use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 2 OF 9 SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Because of the site's location, it has no direct frontage on a public street and therefore, no right-of-way dedication or street frontage improvements are possible. For this reason, Rough Proportionality findings are not applicable to this proposal. Use Classification: The applicant has proposed a wireless communications facility. Section 18.152 (Wireless Communications Uses) identifies permitted wireless uses categories such as a permitted use in the Central Business District Zoning District. The proposed wireless communications tower use is a permitted use within the Central Business District where the height of the tower is no more than 100 feet. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no minimum lot square footage and no minimum lot width standard. A minimum of 15% landscaping is required to be maintained. The entire area proposed for this use is partially graveled. The applicant proposes to landscape approximately a 276 square foot area around the 640 square foot lease area. This equals a landscape percentage of 43% of the lease area. For this reason, the applicant has landscaped an area that is in excess of the percentage required for the square footage of the lease area to be developed. Setbacks: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except 30 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. This standard is not applicable because the site does not adjoin a residential zoning district. Sensitive Lands: Section 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100 year floodplains, floodways and wetlands that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. As part of the application, the applicant provided a wetlands and 100-year flood plain delineation that indicate the proposed lease area is more than 50 feet from adjoining wetlands areas. The proposed lease area is also above the 100-year flood plain elevation in this area. Water Resources Overlay: Section 18.85 identifies Fanno Creek as a Major Stream that requires a 50 foot buffer unless certain reduction criteria are met. As part of the application, the applicant provided a wetlands and 100-flood plain delineation that indicate the proposed lease area is more than 50 feet from adjoining wetlands areas. The proposed lease area is also above the 146-foot, 100-year flood plain elevation in this area. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 3 OF 9 Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of proposed and existing shrubs that are to screen the proposed lease area. Street Trees: Section 18.100 states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed lease area does not have frontage on a public or private street. For this reason, the street tree planting requirement is not found to be applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Because the lease area is at the end of a two-way driveway, the lease area does not adjoin a clear vision area. For this reason, this standard is not found to be applicable. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio for a mini storage and warehousing type use or a utility use. The existing portion of the site that would be utilized is presently developed with storage units. The off-street parking standards do not require off-street parking spaces for the applicants proposed use of an adjoining storage unit. Because the applicant intends a once a month maintenance check only of the storage unit and communications monopole use, requiring an additional parking space to be provided is not necessary. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which are accommodating two way access provide a minimum paved width of 24 feet. The existing driveways that are to be utilized to access the proposed utility lease area comply with the 24-foot minimum paved width standard. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.100, 18.84, 18.85, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.152. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Sections 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 4 OF 9 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.12 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has not proposed to remove any existing trees to construct this facility. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened to the extent possible with landscaping. A Condition of Approval requiring the tower to be constructed with a non-reflective material and of a neutral color has been required. These measures meet the requirements of the Wireless Communications standards. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened to the extent possible with landscaping. A Condition of Approval requiring the tower to be constructed with a non-reflective material and of a neutral color has been required. These measures meet the requirements of the Wireless Communications standards. Pedestrian Pathway: Section 18.120.180(A).8 states that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian / bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian / bicycle plan. The site adjoins the 100-year floodplain. Due to the limited transportation impact of this use, dedication of floodplain areas is not roughly proportional to the impact of this development. A pedestrian and bicycle pathway also already exists along this site's frontage on Fanno Creek. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180(A).10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and had no comments or concerns with this application as proposed. Access: Section 18.120.180(A).11 requires that site access meet the minimum standards set forth in Section 18.108. Provisions for emergency vehicle access circulation shall be addressed. Provisions for pedestrianways and bicycleways shall be provided if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The site has been reviewed for compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108 elsewhere within this staff report. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 5 OF 9 Parking: Section 18.120.180(A).13 requires that the standards of Section 18.106, the Clear Vision standards of Section 18.102 and the Access. Egress and Circulation standards of Section 18.108 be reviewed. These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.120.180(A).14 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of existing and proposed shrubs to screen the lease area. Drainage: Section 18.120.180(A).15 requires that the applicant comply with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and had no comments concerning this use. Due to the limited amount of additional impervious surface that would be created, a fee in-lieu of constructing a water quality or quantity treatment facility is required to be paid as part of the building permit fees. Handicapped Accessibility Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).16 requires that the handicapped facilities be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 487 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. A detailed review for compliance will be conducted prior to the issuance of building permits by the Building Division. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).18 requires that an application comply with the all other applicable standards of the provisions of the underlying zone shall apply. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Wireless Communications Facilities: Section 18.152.050 provides the following review criteria for new communications towers within commercial zoning districts. Uses Permitted: Towers in commercial zones and the I-P zone shall be setback from any existing off- site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The proposed tower would be located within the Central Business Zoning District which is a commercial zone. The proposed location does not adjoin any off-site residences to the north, south and east of the tower. To the west, the tower adjoins Fanno Creek. There are existing residences on the west side of Fanno Creek. These residences would be approximately 475 feet from the tower. For this reason, the tower as proposed, complies with this standard. Towers within Public Open Space areas shall be setback from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. This property is not designated as Public Open Space therefore, this standard is not applicable. Collocation of an antennae that extends more than 20 feet above an existing tower or non-tower structure or when collocating more than 3 providers in commercial and industrial zones. This standard is not applicable because this tower is a new tower. Collocation is not proposed at this time but appears feasible in the future based on the design of the proposed tower and lease area. Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure. This property is not designated as residential therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 6 OF 9 If additional accessory equipment shelters or related equipment are proposed and existing landscaping is to be removed and cannot be replaced on the site to achieve the original intent. Or if existing landscaping cannot sufficiently screen a new shelter and/or equipment if the original intent is no longer applicable. This standard is not applicable because no existing landscaping is proposed to be removed as part of this tower. Accessory equipment is proposed to be located within an adjoining storage unit. Towers and antennas Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure. This property is not designated as residential therefore, this standard is not applicable. Review Criteria: New towers shall have a non-reflective surface and a neutral color or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to FAA's requirements. The applicant has not indicated the surface type or tower color. A Condition of Approval has been required that the tower shall be constructed of a non-reflective surface and a neutral color. Towers shall be setback in accordance with the setbacks contained with the base zone except where adjacent to an off-site residence in which case the tower shall be setback a distance equal to the height of the tower. The Central Business District does not have setback requirements except that a 30-foot setback is required where a commercial use adjoins a residential zoning district. The site would maintain approximately a 475-foot setback to residences on the west side of Fanno Creek. No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The proposed tower would be approximately 1,270 feet from the nearest existing wireless communications tower on the Water Department site at 8777 SW Burnham Street. Tower height shall not exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users. The applicant has proposed a tower height of 100 feet in compliance with this requirement. No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA has not previously required lighting for towers of 100 feet in height. For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum 6 foot fence. The applicant has proposed to enclose a lease area around the tower with a 6-foot-high fence. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within 3 years of planting. The applicant has proposed that the fence enclosure be screened with 10, 5-foot-tall arborvitae's around the west and along a portion of the north side of the fenced enclosure area which are expected to exceed this opacity and height standard at 3 years. Planting additional arborvitae on the east side of the enclosure is not necessary because the enclosure backs up against the adjoining storage building. Planting arborvitae on the remaining portion of the north and the entire south side of the enclosure is also not possible because access to the enclosure must be provided. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 7 OF 9 Noise generating equipment shall be sound buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 DBA (day)/40 DBA (night) when adjacent to a noise sensitive land use and 75 DBA (day)/ 60 DBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The applicant has proposed to enclose the associated equipment for this tower inside the adjoining storage unit. For this reason, no sound buffering is necessary. Other requirements: At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state, and Federal regulations, including but not limited to the Oregon Uniform Structural Code, Building Codes and FAA requirements. The applicant is required to comply with the applicable approval standards through the process of obtaining the necessary building permits. Street Improvements: Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. Because the subject lease area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street and would utilize an existing paved accessway, no street improvements are required to serve this additional use. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division reviewed this application and had the following comments: Compliance with T.A.B. 1015 will be required as part of the building permit review process. No other comments or objections were provided. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections were received. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant/owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 8 OF 9 Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: OCTOBER 8, 1998 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY OCTOBER 19, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides t a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is en and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 19, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. October 8. 1998 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner, AICP AO • t./:' October 8. 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer"brrff DATE Planning Man.ge is\curpin\mark_r\sdr\sdr98-10.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 9 OF 9 (.d! 1) 'd3dINf1f `.)NILSIX3 M., (dt1) d31VZV ;t,; ., '' ( 0 0NIl SIX 3 , 9'.' . z tidy: ) 3e1In08aV S X3 `� `�IA0883 NVIdlSda3d SNIlSIX3,, i !'!7 �' 431AV8O SSd2iO S„ JNI1S X3 IIC CO) JNIISIX3 /13AV2:10 w ._. S. 30N33 '�; ?: vz "I ONUS Xl JNIISIX3 a'► rim NW * Oh Crib: t 3 imei l C 1 x x x L 101 �!� (7, , iv t* 1:.: --i z 7 z 0 C) • cn v A N ) -i V i -1 (J) Q U m q a o J 9018 H Oat i v 0018 (A Z O — — — fl. D 0' 6 l d 1 — -r---- �, cD cD SS33 V 30 co 0 c m i 31f10d I o to -, O 31vO� o 0 Z C I JNIISIX3 I I l 3 o X CO C . CA CD Cl) . co CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION ,aA r4p9� -�._, m CITY of TIGARD GEOGNAPH c:,00RMATION SYSTEM ��` a''`` VICINITY MAP t.• SDR 98-0010 � I ■ A �G� *1'5'°�� N EXTE L Z COMMUNICATIONS, d MONOPOLE. , �,���,� TOWE R 4, A . 9a .� ,. ARIL 0 00;• ,N,,,Ipp, 4, dilik 1111 fir *** 0 ■ ' 4** il P • • let ` 0 200 400 600 Feet t...0I �4A.. . 4 til C611111Wr Ai ti 1".472 feet � S row A■iii1b ,. _ ' City of Tigard p094,♦ ■• NI Information on this map is for general location ony and 41... should be verified with the Development Services Division. ..■ 13 SW Hall,63 9171■-_ il- (5031839gard. hnpl/www.d.tigaM.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 7, 1998;C:magic\MAGICO2.APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS J A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS -- CITY OF n� Community(DeveCopment v' Shaping Better Community DATE: September 11,1998 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:(503)639-4171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 F► (Please provide the fothrwing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 44, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITTYY�OF TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping J4 Better Community DATE: September 17,1990 TO: David Scott,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:(503)639-4111 Fax:1503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 ►► (Please provide the follirwing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: rr �� I Phone Number[sl: I . SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ***446' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY—All ARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 11,1998 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:[503)639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEBE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: v We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folrowing information)Name of Person[st Commenting: ( )IM �1 C I Phone Numher[sl: SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: September 11,1998 TO: Brian Roger,Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28. 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4. (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: Phone Number(s): �'�-- I SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: September 17,1998 TO: Development Services Technicians Dianna: moo. Geo: Bonnie: ri Debbi VIES/ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:[5031639-4111 Fax:[5031684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 f• (ease pr.:wide the following in format ion)Name of Person(sl Commenting: SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • 0 . ,eeJ1 �Ilh REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community De veCopment Shaping (Better Community DATE: September 11,1998 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of TiWard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE < Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Blcase provide tfie fodowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number's): SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS IP . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CIT area: (CI in csl MI CITIZEN 1NVOLVEMENTTEAMS co Place for review In library CR Booktsl FILE NOLSI: 10 11. 9 E---- 00/e' FILE NAMEISI: t L.e Kivi 10 40/00 7Q CITY OFFICES ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,P.nn,Ns...w L COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT/0,0w,,Secs.Te ,.c,.o. L POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,cnm.P..ew Officer BUILDING DIV./David Scott,ev,wngontia LEf�IGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,0romM.R«,.,.En9,.,.., _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,oP..arionm Man .y. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Gry Roc wder SOP€RAT1ONS DEPT./John Roy,Pao«n A,n.s« _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS , _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia HuffmarVSWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS -. - _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,N«ghbrld town PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton, OR 97076 _OR. PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING • _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street, NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham, OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,Growth ManagementCoordhtalor _OR. DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Greens ww oescontw(CPAarzoAS) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 Building#16, Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Ptannrrg 155 N. First Avenue —CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350, MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera _ODOT,REGION 1 * _ Brent Curtis(CPA.i PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Worth.Rev.coord. _ Scott King(CPA's) —CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _ Mike Borreson(Engineer) David Knowles,Planning Bureau 01 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _ Jim Tice(IGo•s) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _ Tom Harry(c„nsrn pi 49.1 1 120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _000T,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _ Phil Healy(cwrery Pt Ass.) Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Perms Speaairsl _ Sr.Cartographer(crwzcA-MS 141 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _TCI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay, Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr, Region Manager Michael Kiser,Project Planner 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton, OR 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 _GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft,Engineering _OREGON ELECTRIC R/R _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: OR030546 (dURl INCEONNOR(NQN/TANIAFER/RPRFJASSOR1 Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Pete Nelson Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay,Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 * • INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION if WITHIN 250' Of MC SUBJECT PROPeRTY FOR ANY/ALL Cllr PROJECTS. fP1^0JLCT PLANNER IS RSSPON11IE1$FOR INDICATING PARTICS TO ROMP') h:\oattyvnasters■rlcnotrca.mst 16-Jan-98 ail Ilk ,.ALL i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development • Shaping Better Community STATJ OAF o'GoN ) County of Washington )ss City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Gunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Died(Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR 98-0010/NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: : - I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type(Kind of Notice) FOR: . I (File No(Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 8 day of October,1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 8 day of October,1998, postage prepaid. A rte. / / F fir!- -.n tip. es R.tice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of -e e411.&-e K- , 19 /I. OFFICIAL SEAL � l4�?�14 t----� �� DIANE M JELDE NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY BLIC OF OREGON ., 4 COMMISSION NO.046142 9 /7 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER V7.i99y My Commission Expires: / EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0010 u"! CITY OF TIGARD NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONOPOLE TOWER CommunityOeuefopment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 1/2/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER Site Development Review SDR 98-0010 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to develop a 100-foot monopole tower, mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top of the tower for an overall height of 115 feet. Future microwave antennas are also proposed to be located on the tower. Related equipment for this tower would be located within an existing adjoining storage unit. A six-foot-high chain link fence would surround the lease area. APPLICANT: D. Garvey Corporation OWNER: Burnham Business & Storage Ryan Young, Project Manager 9490 SW Barbur Blvd., S-200 10101 SW Barbur Blvd., S-207 Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97219 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham Street; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 02200; and 2S102DB Tax Lot 00200. The communications facility is proposed within an approximately 640 square foot lease area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 1 OF 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Engineering Division (503) 639-4171.) 1 . The tower shall be constructed of a non-reflective surface and neutral color. The applicant shall indicate the surface material type and color of the tower. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 2. All site improvement shall be installed and maintained as approved, pursuant to the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The Burnham Storage and Business center was developed under Conditional Use Permit (CU) 2-74 and Site Development Review (SDR) 4-74. Since its development, several business uses have applied for Conditional Use Permits to allow operation within the center. Vicinity Information: The site is adjoined by a pedestrian/bicycle pathway and Fanno Creek to the west, the City Water Department storage area and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Fire Station to the east. The site is adjoined by the City of Tigard Public Works Building to the north. To the south the property is adjoined by the GTE Administrative and Service uses. All adjoining properties have a zoning designation of Central Business District. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently developed with the Burnham Business and Storage Use. The site is generally level with a portion of the westerly section of the site sloping slightly towards Fanno Creek. The applicant has proposed to lease a portion of the property and develop a 100-foot tall wireless communications tower with 3 omni-directional "whip" antennas of 15 feet in height. The lease area would be enclosed within a six-foot-high chain link fence. Related equipment to serve this antenna would be located within an adjoining tenant space of the existing storage and business park use. The site would obtain access via an existing accessway that was developed to serve the business and storage use. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 2 OF 9 SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Because of the site's location, it has no direct frontage on a public street and therefore, no right-of-way dedication or street frontage improvements are possible. For this reason, Rough Proportionality findings are not applicable to this proposal. Use Classification: The applicant has proposed a wireless communications facility. Section 18.152 (Wireless Communications Uses) identifies permitted wireless uses categories such as a permitted use in the Central Business District Zoning District. The proposed wireless communications tower use is a permitted use within the Central Business District where the height of the tower is no more than 100 feet. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no minimum lot square footage and no minimum lot width standard. A minimum of 15% landscaping is required to be maintained. The entire area proposed for this use is partially graveled. The applicant proposes to landscape approximately a 276 square foot area around the 640 square foot lease area. This equals a landscape percentage of 43% of the lease area. For this reason, the applicant has landscaped an area that is in excess of the percentage required for the square footage of the lease area to be developed. Setbacks: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except 30 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. This standard is not applicable because the site does not adjoin a residential zoning district. Sensitive Lands: Section 18.84 contains regulations for lands within 100 year floodplains, floodways and wetlands that are subject to Sensitive Lands Review. As part of the application, the applicant provided a wetlands and 100-year flood plain delineation that indicate the proposed lease area is more than 50 feet from adjoining wetlands areas. The proposed lease area is also above the 100-year flood plain elevation in this area. Water Resources Overlay: Section 18.85 identifies Fanno Creek as a Major Stream that requires a 50 foot buffer unless certain reduction criteria are met. As part of the application, the applicant provided a wetlands and 100-flood plain delineation that indicate the proposed lease area is more than 50 feet from adjoining wetlands areas. The proposed lease area is also above the 146-foot, 100-year flood plain elevation in this area. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 3 OF 9 Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of proposed and existing shrubs that are to • screen the proposed lease area. Street Trees: Section 18.100 states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed lease area does not have frontage on a public or private street. For this reason, the street tree planting requirement is not found to be applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. Because the lease area is at the end of a two-way driveway, the lease area does not adjoin a clear vision area. For this reason, this standard is not found to be applicable. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio for a mini storage and warehousing type use or a utility use. The existing portion of the site that would be utilized is presently developed with storage units. The off-street parking standards do not require off-street parking spaces for the applicants proposed use of an adjoining storage unit. Because the applicant intends a once a month maintenance check only of the storage unit and communications monopole use, requiring an additional parking space to be provided is not necessary. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which are accommodating two way access provide a minimum paved width of 24 feet. The existing driveways that are to be utilized to access the proposed utility lease area comply with the 24-foot minimum paved width standard. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.100, 18.84, 18.85, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120 and 18.152. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Sections 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. NOTICE OF DECISION SOR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 4 OF 9 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.12 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.17 (Signs) and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The applicant has not proposed to remove any existing trees to construct this facility. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened to the extent possible with landscaping. A Condition of Approval requiring the tower to be constructed with a non-reflective material and of a neutral color has been required. These measures meet the requirements of the Wireless Communications standards. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened to the extent possible with landscaping. A Condition of Approval requiring the tower to be constructed with a non-reflective material and of a neutral color has been required. These measures meet the requirements of the Wireless Communications standards. Pedestrian Pathway: Section 18.120.180(A).8 states that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian / bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian / bicycle plan. The site adjoins the 100-year floodplain. Due to the limited transportation impact of this use, dedication of floodplain areas is not roughly proportional to the impact of this development. A pedestrian and bicycle pathway also already exists along this site's frontage on Fanno Creek. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180(A).10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's plan and had no comments or concerns with this application as proposed. Access: Section 18.120.180(A).11 requires that site access meet the minimum standards set forth in Section 18.108. Provisions for emergency vehicle access circulation shall be addressed. Provisions for pedestrianways and bicycleways shall be provided if such facilities are shown on an adopted plan. The site has been reviewed for compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108 elsewhere within this staff report. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 5 OF 9 Parking: Section 18.120.180(A).13 requires that the standards of Section 18.106, the Clear Vision standards of Section 18.102 and the Access. Egress and Circulation standards of Section 18.108 be reviewed. These standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.120.180(A).14 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of existing and proposed shrubs to screen the lease area. Drainage: Section 18.120.180(A).15 requires that the applicant comply with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and had no comments concerning this use. Due to the limited amount of additional impervious surface that would be created, a fee in-lieu of constructing a water quality or quantity treatment facility is required to be paid as part of the building permit fees. Handicapped Accessibility Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).16 requires that the handicapped facilities be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 487 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. A detailed review for compliance will be conducted prior to the issuance of building permits by the Building Division. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.120.180(A).18 requires that an application comply with the all other applicable standards of the provisions of the underlying zone shall apply. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Wireless Communications Facilities: Section 18.152.050 provides the following review criteria for new communications towers within commercial zoning districts. Uses Permitted: Towers in commercial zones and the I-P zone shall be setback from any existing off- site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. The proposed tower would be located within the Central Business Zoning District which is a commercial zone. The proposed location does not adjoin any off-site residences to the north, south and east of the tower. To the west, the tower adjoins Fanno Creek. There are existing residences on the west side of Fanno Creek. These residences would be approximately 475 feet from the tower. For this reason, the tower as proposed, complies with this standard. Towers within Public Open Space areas shall be setback from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. This property is not designated as Public Open Space therefore, this standard is not applicable. Collocation of an antennae that extends more than 20 feet above an existing tower or non-tower structure or when collocating more than 3 providers in commercial and industrial zones. This standard is not applicable because this tower is a new tower. Collocation is not proposed at this time but appears feasible in the future based on the design of the proposed tower and lease area. Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure. This property is not designated as residential therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 6 OF 9 If additional accessory equipment shelters or related equipment are proposed and existing landscaping is to be removed and cannot be replaced on the site to achieve the original intent. Or if existing landscaping cannot sufficiently screen a new shelter and/or equipment if the original intent is no longer applicable. This standard is not applicable because no existing landscaping is proposed to be removed as part of this tower. Accessory equipment is proposed to be located within an adjoining storage unit. Towers and antennas Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure. This property is not designated as residential therefore, this standard is not applicable. Review Criteria: New towers shall have a non-reflective surface and a neutral color or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to FAA's requirements. The applicant has not indicated the surface type or tower color. A Condition of Approval has been required that the tower shall be constructed of a non-reflective surface and a neutral color. Towers shall be setback in accordance with the setbacks contained with the base zone except where adjacent to an off-site residence in which case the tower shall be setback a distance equal to the height of the tower. The Central Business District does not have setback requirements except that a 30-foot setback is required where a commercial use adjoins a residential zoning district. The site would maintain approximately a 475-foot setback to residences on the west side of Fanno Creek. No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. The proposed tower would be approximately 1,270 feet from the nearest existing wireless communications tower on the Water Department site at 8777 SW Burnham Street. Tower height shall not exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users. The applicant has proposed a tower height of 100 feet in compliance with this requirement. No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA has not previously required lighting for towers of 100 feet in height. For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum 6 foot fence. The applicant has proposed to enclose a lease area around the tower with a 6-foot-high fence. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within 3 years of planting. The applicant has proposed that the fence enclosure be screened with 10, 5-foot-tall arborvitae's around the west and along a portion of the north side of the fenced enclosure area which are expected to exceed this opacity and height standard at 3 years. Planting additional arborvitae on the east side of the enclosure is not necessary because the enclosure backs up against the adjoining storage building. Planting arborvitae on the remaining portion of the north and the entire south side of the enclosure is also not possible because access to the enclosure must be provided. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 7 OF 9 Noise generating equipment shall be sound buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 DBA (day)/40 DBA (night) when adjacent to a noise sensitive land use and 75 DBA (day)/ 60 DBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The applicant has proposed to enclose the associated equipment for this tower inside the adjoining storage unit. For this reason, no sound buffering is necessary. Other requirements: At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state, and Federal regulations, including but not limited to the Oregon Uniform Structural Code, Building Codes and FAA requirements. The applicant is required to comply with the applicable approval standards through the process of obtaining the necessary building permits. Street Improvements: Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street and that streets within and adjacent shall be improved in accordance with ordinance standards. Because the subject lease area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street and would utilize an existing paved accessway, no street improvements are required to serve this additional use. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division reviewed this application and had the following comments: Compliance with T.A.B. 1015 will be required as part of the building permit review process. No other comments or objections were provided. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections were received. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant/owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 8 OF 9 Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: OCTOBER 8, 1998 • THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON MONDAY OCTOBER 19, 1998 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 19, 1998. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 1/i/(444 October 8, 1998 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner, AICP October 8, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer"frff DATE Planning Mange is lcurpinlmark_r\sdr\sdr98-10.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 9 OF 9 ':d' 1) 'd3dIN(lf `1NILSIX3 (d!1) V31VZV i JNIISIX3 •11 -w�.°f .- lc-il.1 ? 3`d I.IA088V C Hldd `� `JN1151X3 NVIa1_.103d _NIISIX3 . .. Al% P!7 V3aV ! 31VJ a8 JNIISIX3 /13ndaJ . w 30N33 • , • R, L- SISOd JNIISIX3 r:'.(•:` - - re. az ONIISIX.1 -_.+ a = m 3 * t!rm r i rr= tom. x x x Imp liti R L lO1 �' z 7 7 0 0 C) /4". ' V") �n g -I V I o <7 t:, L L.-- 0 J `001H H 001H V 0018 I ' Q � D - - - ..O-,sZ4 1'd— � � — 1 v� �_ Cn �__ ss3Dod 3o I '� 31(106 CO ET rn � � ` c m c oo 31VJ� c 0 2 , JNIISIX3 I 1 a3 0 � oo6 c N_ CD N N CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION A, rw in CITY oR TIGAD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 'Yiy �F GF�� ♦ •'! VICINITY MAP t• SDR 98-0010 • .• • �' , / A °G� N EXTE L COMMUNICATIONS• MONOPOLE �,�,A 4 TOWER LtIjI(2)SUBJE ♦ # 14 yo , PARCELS• 0 200 400 600 Feet ' * rt 1=a72 teat I A ,J.L.,_ �� Ci of Ti and .,,, Information on this map is for general locaton only and III should be verified wish the Development„ 13125 SW H41 1 Tigard,OR 97223 � (503)639-a171 r http:/Avww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 7, 1998;C:lmagic\MAGICO2.APR b R. `1 F�.-OOI D AJ X =L e.61714/14i/UV IC +i iO�1,"5 ��rD�OL� 1, /o !� • • 2S102AD-01800 2S102AD-01900 EXHI B'I T B CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY L P II TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE bb65 SW BURNHAM 20665 BLANTON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 2511 ••-020 0 2S I I'•D-02000 TIGARD '.TER DISTRICT TIGARD AT • DISTRICT PO B• 23006 PO BOX • s TII!-•RD,OR 9722 TIG•'I,OR 97 • 2S102AD-02200 2S102AD-02400 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC OVERFLOW CORP 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 8950 SW BURNHAM ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-02700 2S1s'•D-0280s MILLER RICHARD L TIGARD . " OF 8970 SW BURNHAM 13125 : •LL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97223 TI •RD,OR 9 • 2S102AD-02900 2S 5 AD-03000 KEEFER MARION W TIGAR• ITY • 12555 SW HART RD 13125 SW ' L BEAVERTON,OR 97008 TIGARD dR • 23 2S102DA-00300 2S102DB-00100 SCHRAMM ANN M GTE NORTHWEST INC 6292 PREAKNESS WAY PO BOX 152206-HQCO2E26 WEST LINN,OR 97068 IRVING,TX 75015 2S : DB-00200 251,: B-00500 BURNH• :.SINESS&STORAGE LLC TIGARD ITY •F 9500 S :AR. • BLVD STE 300 13125 S -..LL PO• AND,OR 9 • TIGA• OR 9 3 2S102DB-09500 DUCK CREEK HOMES OWNERS OF 33 SW 3RD AVE PORTLAND,OR 97204 D.GARVEY CORPORATION ATTN: RYAN YOUNG, PROJECT MANAGER 10101 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 207 PORTLAND OR 97219 BURNHAM BUSINESS & STORAGE 9490 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 PORTLAND OR 97219 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 924 1 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 —_______ ,_ , _- _ - Legal Notice Advertising SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR}98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice The Director has approved, subject conditions,a request by Nextel Communications for approval of a communications facility consisting of 13125 SW Hall Blvd. the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three(3) •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit omni-directional "whip"antennas near the top,for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas.The equipment for the facility would *Accounts Payable • be located inside an existing storage facility.The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located on a vacant area next to a storage facility.A six- foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole-and lease area. LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD,Tax Lot 02000. The proposed communications facility would be located within an ap- proximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the par- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION cel. ZONE:Central Business District;CBD. The Central Business Dis- STATE OF OREGON, ) trict provides for a concentrated central office,retail,civic,high density COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss• residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, I, Kathy Snyder 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,and 18.152. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tualatin Times I j� ,, :C77140 , °`k; r . 1 - *- a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 . ' � and 193.020; published at Tigard in the i '; y j_ i -..',/ aforesaid county and state; that the - -' ` v" 'T i Nextel Comm.Monopole y T \`, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ! k •, �� • entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and i consecutive in the following issues: . October 8 , 1998 \\ s !1 . ii-A- r . d■ ill Subscribed and sworn to b oree this8 th day OotQbe r, 19 9 8 - E Qr� - t - 1 � [;' N y Public for Oregon =:, `l ., !. - • • z . . My Commission Expires: l MY COI+ , _ G - AFFIDAVIT ..4:0_;;, - . _- _ " " , 1 . ; f_ The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on October 19, 1998. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten(10)days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,October 19,19011. TT9241 -Publish October 8, 1998. 444 \ 0, N CITY of TIGARD 4 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM NOTIFICATION 4.7, AREA MAP CARL H JOHNSON FAMI Y L ' IAT`N VALLEY FIRE BESCU' '29 SDR 98-00I0 ILLE RI 'ARD L 10 o OVERFLOW 1 71. \,/./ �� y TIGARD WATER DISTRIC N E XT E L COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE (2)SUBJE BU' : i ESS&STORAGE LLC 111\ TOWER PARCELS I vor SCHRAMM,ANN M ►0 1 . ` GTE NORTHWEST INC `I r # \ ___ • . %< D CK CREEK HOMES OWNERS OF .4*Iiik << � TIGARD,CITY OF P * 6% 0 200 400 3 F Ir4 - OW P 1'04721est,441h!",,, 0. 04% Nal 111111111/0 MN i rim City of Tigard 0.111- Information on this map is for general location only and „.... should be verified with the Development Services Division. . 1111 r _l. (503)639-4171 WIIP . http:I/www.d.tigard.ocus ----- Community Development Plot date:Oct 7, 1998;C:\magic\MAGICO2.APR APPLICANT-� TER IALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . •ice 4 APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ;1/1 eiq DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 6' OO Su Bvt.Ntiot A FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S 1 Z I D ?mac Case No.(s): 'S !)D (0 tv (2,e R, 22 ex) 2S l 0-2_1)R 7o>L ted----206 Other Case N()`:: 7 Receipt No.: Y b --o, Site Size: .5- �� ,p Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': UrIftl ktn\ E5■ g. koralc Date: f r �4 Address: 94 Q``0 SW rb��$lYa• Phone: (50 245- 1)3 \i c . �cc Zip: 41219 Date Determined To Be Complete: City: �{ p: Applicant': D. CraiNel Cw fo,-gto.. f br N.eikel (;oMMuNtcai:o/S Comp Pla n/Zon Desi na . Address: I O\O l Sv.) Barbwr J d. Phone: Lr b3)ctli-3018 ( � G 1 ste. 201 city:Por'lt\awc1 , CAL- Zip: 4,1 2 l ct CIT Area: *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Rev.4/21/97 i:\curpinlmasterslsdra.doc must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS "_- PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: �� „�,f ❑ Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization ; ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed 1 ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'h"x 11") yteei ❑ Applicant's Statement c-6 (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate L� ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card ViCit) (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ Filing Fee (Under 5100,000) $ 800.00 �' (S100,000-$999,999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 I (+55/$10.000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: N'I APPLICANTS: I To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as ',described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate anv deed restrictions that_may be attacheli to or imposed upon the subject Drocrty. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. +-� n qQ� DATED this % / day of /9-11 (Q.S 19 / " • Owner's igna Fe ACEA 7— Owner's Signature ' Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 I CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping,a(Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 1/2/99 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0010 FILE TITLE: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE APPLICANT: D. Garvey Corporation OWNER: Burnham Business & Storage Attn: Ryan Young, Project Manager 9490 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 10101 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 207 Portland, OR 97219 Portland, OR 97219 REQUEST: Nextel Communications has proposed a communications facility consisting of the construction of a 100-foot monopole tower mounted with three (3) omni- directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a six-foot high chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. cod .t �s�nz1D -ilOC> LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 42990'. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The Central Business District provides for a concentrated central office, retail, civic, high density residential and mixed use area with related utilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.84, 18.85, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108 and 18.152. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: MONDAY SEPTEMBER 28,1998 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: THURSDAY OCTOBER 8,1998 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM_ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM_ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM_ COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP K LANDSCAPE PLANK NARRATIVE K SITE PLANK TREE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLANK TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WETLANDS REPORT K OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 417 SDR 98-0010 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4..„..,.............. .4, CITY OF TIGARD OREGON August 31, 1998 Ryan Young D. Garvey Corporation 10101 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 207 Portland, OR 97219 Re: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR98-0010 Dear Mr. Young: This letter is in response to your recent Site Development Review application for a new monopole at 8900 SW Burnham Street. This application has been considered to be incomplete pending the submission of the following additional information: 1 . A landscape plan showing the type of landscape materials to be provided around the remainder of the proposed lease area. 2. A discussion as to why the existing Sprint monopole at 8777 SW Burnham Street cannot serve the proposed communications provider. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, - G Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is\curpin\mark_r\garvey.doc c: SDR 98-0010 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 N■■1- MI MIMI NM ■■■1 = BONN iii- ::a BOOB. : ... RECEIVED MOM Al1G31199 D:` GARVEv CORPORATION PROJECT MANAGERS August 31, 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Response to 8/31/98 Notice of Incompleteness letter(SDR98-0010) Dear Mr. Roberts: Please find enclosed the landscape plan showing the type of landscape materials to be provided for the proposed Nextel site, located at 8900 SW Burnham Street. In response to item 2., Nextel contacted Sprint on November 10, 1997 requesting information about collocation opportunities on the Sprint monopole. The Sprint antennas and platform occupy the top location, and could not accommodate Nextel at the necessary height. The next available height would begin at 80 feet, which would not provide the needed coverage requirements. Please contact me at (503) 977-3018 should you have any questions.. Sincerely, • Ry n K. Youn Project Manager 10101 SW Barbur Boulevard • Suite 207 • Portland,OR 97219 (503)977-3033 • fax(503)977-3132 ' BONITA/BURNHAM Y % ;.j; f// /f/ 10220 SW GREENBURG RC i S �SUITE #601 0 / EXISTING STORAGE PORTLAND, OREGON 972 BUI • %' LDI"G 503-293-5500 y .2% 2 X 6 PRESSURE TREATED ' ' ,/,:;;',ii TIMBER. TOENAIL ADJOINING / ' / ,./,,.' Ii � f/�� ::::SH i // / %// %I / ,�f O O • O O LANDSCAPD AREA O / \ J[ + 1.., l, rl :.:1: t 51E10I IL K ROWAN / .""?\ + 'I 1 I tt- - FASTEN W/(3) 16 PoRTlA10,MUCH • //�' �c ` S ._•�'1� PENNY NAILS ,J+ �c�� i V 0 It k ' OF / /f I • r� 4 --. �_ i I.. 2X 4X I8- WOODEN sTAKE(TO BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM OF 4' INTERVALS ALONG 2 X 6 ' I I I � I PRESSURE TREATED x c INFER AND AT BOTH 1l 0 - I I I ENDS OF TIBER) I NO. DATE DESCRIPTION w X I Nom, N• :_, AGGREGATE GRADE AND LANDSCAPE GRADE TO BE ESTABUSHED SIMULTANEOUSLY. 0 • ' CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREAD TIMBER SEPARATOR BETWEN ALL.LANDSCAPE AND GRAVEL SURFACE AREAS. 4` : 3E-1 A 0 / - II A .'. _ x`::X':.X�.x—x—x—x—x—x—x \ ,. ; ; _ LANDSCAPE AREA SEPERATION DETAIL N.T.S. I 2 O --- GAZLEY LANDSCAPE SEPERA11OI--/— PLOWMAN S1PoP 2X8 PRESSURE•`\ TREATED TIMBER.SEE 2/L-1 T. TOPSOIL SHALL CONSIST OF IMPORTED RIVER LOAM(TO CONTAIN 35-40X SILT) All ATICLNSOA \ `^•"\ TO BE PLACED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ADO TEXTURAL AMENDMENTS AND 03I x 7 _ \ \ 'SHRUBS: (10) BLEND ALL COMPONENTS THOROUGHLY AS DESCRIBED BELOW. SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTERS �,IN O x' I \ \\ ` (AMERICAFf�ARBORMTAE) SHALL BE MINIMUM/X 6-FOR SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER AND 12-FOR TREES. NNW. WIN PS 174 me / \ \ 5'-O-HIGH 0 C--o-o.c 2- TEXTURAL SOW AM010MEHTS: i' t \ \ GARDEN CARE COMPOST: AS MANUFACTURED BY TAVLMAN NE155,NORTH AMERICAN SOILS , �}. }, ` �VJ/f/ \ `8= _.- PORTLAND.OREGON,MINIMUM ONE YEAR OLD,FREE FROM NOXIOUS W®SEED AND { .� �.. ` JAI( !� \ \ MATERIAL HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. PROVIDE 3-M SHRUB BEDS. J .` /I ` \JxS \ \- `` ` 3. GYPSUM: IN SHRUB GRANULAR(CALCIUM SULFATE).50 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET `\ -- \•• '"I I}' ; \\ ...- •-..._ `... \ 4. AGRICULTURAL GRADE LIME: 50 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET N SHRUB BEDS. f tl`'� 5- POLYMER WATER RETENTION GRANULES-FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS \ \ \ FOR OUANTITY. • \\\ \\ \` 6. ROTOTILL ALL PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 TO 8 INCHES. ADO \ \ TOPSOIL TEXTURAL AMENDMENTS AND REI1U,BLENDING AMENDMENTS MTh LOOSENED \ SOIL THOROUGHLY. LANOCSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL STICKS STONES AND • \ \ \ \ .,1 DEBRIS TURNED UP IN WORKING SCR. AT COMPLETION OF SOIL PREPARATION.SOIL - SHALL BE A FINE HOMOGENEOUS TEXTURE. COMPACT AREAS TO PROVIDE SMOOTH FINISHED GRACE. 1 • \\ �.\ \ \\_ 7. LAYOUT PLANTS AS DESIGNED EN THE PLAN AND EXCAVATE ALL SOILS FROM PLANTING \ HOLE TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH AND TWO TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL. REMOVE ALL X \ 1 `'' \�! 1 NV SUBSOILS AND REFRAIN FROM USING SOILS IN PLATING MIX OR BACKFILL. PREPARE �' A SOIL MIX AS FOLLOWS: -I • \ : t t 4 y `) 2 PARTS IMPORTED AMENDED TOPSOIL „. "� 1 Silt NAME 1 -.::::;.^: f� '�— \ // /\ 1IE ( / 7 8. TOP ORESSS PLANTING AREAS WITH FERTILIZER(16-16-16.NTH MCRONUTRIENTS•s.• "%'.:•:k�1 I ' ,\ 1.11;7/.:://,,/,,. „ + f AGRWORM PLANT TABS 20-10-5.10 GRAM AND 21 GRAM TABLETS)AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: A/� • ^.;, i`�, \ �'! GROUND COVER 1 OUNCE PER PLANT Wes, 1 +I� \ \\\1\\`tf'lil SHRUBS 4 OUNCES PER PLANT I • \ �`��1�{{1 J TREES 6 OUNCES PER PLANT -„� 9. MULCH PLANTING BEDS WITH APPROVED MEDIUM GRADE ROTTED BARK DUST.3/4-INCH ANUS TO 1 • �` --.--DEPTH OF 2 INCITES I SRE NUMBER x•.���.` • • f���f,�s ` ��\\` LANDSCAPE NOTES 080104-2 D r \r k — — 7 ��-,.� I • I SITE ADDRESS 1. 1 ,y EXISTING AZALEA (TYP) 4 a (2)PRESSURE TREATED DI Y &$T �L DOUGLAS FIR 2-DIAM. f • ad�° ,,,a� 8900 8W 9URNH� TREE , + THUJA OCCICENTAUS (AMERICAN ARBORVITAE) Q VllF1A�j4 'CRS''TRNOHT TREE TIGARD, OR. 972 5' HIGH Q4. 0.C. �' 11.;11.'1 f SEE DETAIL 3 L-1.O FOR STAKING P - 'i i•'..�� BALLED IN I' BARK MULCH -2' DEPTH J A.-:vas�1 �� EXISTING JUNIPER (TYP) BUP.LAP I 7 I IN SHRUB AREAS I SHEET TITLE `���l - FINISH -�- r ORAUC I WATERING BASIN LANDSCAPE? r I ��� i.Aei/lOVN1�G I — 'ji��f��i�ti' ,"---1-0- i�j l: „: ,A PLANT TABS(PER SPECS) R'-In•,%///4//j•„: COMPACTED BACKFILL j .44 _ _ _ SOIL MIXTURE(PER SPECS) NOTE: STAKES SHALL EXTEND MIN. I SHEET NUMBER ONE FOOT BELOW BOTTOM SET ROOTBALL 1" [ REMOVE BURLAP FROMVTOP %3 OF OF PLANT PIT,00 NOT f -------------__----- __-._. __ ROOTBALL. CUT ALL STRINGS. PENETRATE ROOTBALL L O LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1/4"_t-O" { 1 TREE STAKING DETAIL N.T.S. 3 I 97122L01 1 Sprint Sprint PCS" Network Operations Telephone.503 612 1000 &Engineering Fax:503 612 1078 Property/Portland MTh 7770 SW Mohawk,Bldg.F November 19, 1997 Tualatin,Oregon 97062 John Brosy D. Garvey Corp. 2701 NW Vaughn St. Suite 467 Portland,Oregon 97210 RE: Tigard Telecommunication Site Dear Mr.Brosy, Sprint PCS is in receipt of your letter of November 10, 1997 requesting information about existing telecommunication facilities near 8900 SW Burnham Rd.,Tigard,Oregon. Sprint PCS has an existing 100 foot tower located at 8770 Burnham Rd. Our antennas and platform occupy the top location and could not acconunodate Nextel at your requested height. USWest Wireless Communications is collocated at this site with their antennas at 90 feet. The next available height would begin at 80 feet. The specific acceptable mounting height of additional antennas would need approval of US West Wireless Communications as well as Sprint PCS and would require a structural analysis of the foundation.Our leased area at this location would not be adequate for your equipment space requirements however there is additional land available. if 1 can be of further service please call 612-1029. Sincerely, S Walden C�Collocation Coordinator Property Specialist cc: Prop file#047 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON September 17, 1998 Ryan Young D. Garvey Corporation 10101 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 207 Portland, OR 97219 Re: Notice of Complete Submittal/SDR 98-0010 Dear Ryan: This letter is in response to your recent Site Development Review application for a new monopole at 8900 SW Burnham Street. This application has been considered to be complete as of September 1, 1998. We have tentatively scheduled an October 8, 1998 decision date for this application. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, • Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is curpinlmark_rlletters\garvey.doc c: SDR 98-0010 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Xt.TTACHMFIJT 1 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION D.Garvey Corporation 1700 Westlake Avenue North Suite 420 Seattle, Washington 98109 Attn:Planning Department City of Tigard To Whom It May Concern I, Bob Zimmermann, a property manager of Burnham Business & Storage L.L.C. an Oregon L.L.C., hereby certify that Burnham Business & Storage L.L.C., is the owner of the real property located at 8880 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (more specifically described in the attached exhibit), and I authorize D. Garvey Corporation and/or Nextel West Corp., d.b.a. Nextel Communications to apply for the permits and conduct surveys and testing needed to construct a radio communication site and corresponding equipment on the leased premises of the property. Sincerely, Bob Z • 144• an Date Property • ager L ;• 09/25/97 THU 07: 26 (TX/RX NO 85251 4,.• A a.t ATTACHMENT 2 , S�.i t• t -.1.o.� ' G.7 „ •• .-N3_wAu1,TT NQ•,1•e1.1. •a ♦..w.ru..... r- 1'. tt wAauxtrotto ..J {_ • V KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,Thstt_..__ Robert.D. Randall _....__._...._..•......_r..w_ . ,,=.•� <.,. Mreirsalter called the rancor,for the consideration I eroine/ter stated,to grantor paid by._.„...._ ....._..�..,..._._ __ .. ? �_`4A..L.L.c,......_...._.._.............._..........___ hereinafter called the grantee, d,es hereby grant,bargain, sell and convey unto the grantee and grantee's heirs, r successors and assigns,that certain real property,with the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto t i' • ' belonging or in a war appertaining,sifua(ed In l` onf N arty �hi�8�sn...__._County,State of Oregon,described as follow:, -,;',',,,s.--• -.., to-wit: - - . As described in EXHIBIT "g' attc,hed he eto end by this reference incorporated herein, • • c . o s, - •it .is,T�•,� '� ',!%=i1 s`+ ='%,-•_• r-tea (c}rye; w it:1 /4t,,y YZ-� 24 r r ,... t. I I 3ti1.4 � �rt rs F ti ^:tea•`+ts vsi: y-''Cjy.Fr'it� s.. ti S; t Y t . (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT,CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE{ i S�="� r j w. ..'Dt-. -,' I To Have and to Hold the same unto the grantee and grantee's heir;successors end assigns forever. I , t,,Ur . x�tti,.< d;:e N ti: i � _��� it And grantor hereby covenants to and with grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns,that grantor is 1 ry-e �,- �i., ss e-�.st -" ,: a^t, v- I lawfully¢aired in fee simple of the above granted premises,free from all encumbrances EXCept those items I� �,,,,_ • ;•rt ; a~-is4 1 appeEU_.... o record this date. �� • t •R� 4. M r; c°T Z°•. 3 I -....._. ae,.els"'F.L'r ,14.- t,rt •- . .r 1.., a• 1 4•01"��3t 3' to..r e r+ -MY and that �.?e',tsr,,x s.1 _S _;..e.e7,••..c; N ,,,, fit grantor will warrant and forever defend the premises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims I ]• t -., 'v .s •;.1 ',..2� and derrands of all persons whomsoever,except those claiming under the above described erxwmbran:es. I ��`' ?"e"a �`F'�' '. �t .�`'- t"�rM» I The true and actual consideration paid for this tranr/er,stated in terms of dollars,is$ 'C' ' 5;:, Pryh"` , ;zrr 't•••?:... fir;;•-: ()However, the actual consideration consists of .)r includes other property or value given or promised :which is w„•=� . kl-kW .o',Aa� t h y *:;. the w'lw:e � ! S' cs i,er sr'``s jy�. ,� y, k• consideration(indicate c•hieh). (The•rnlm.e L t.rren the r7mtxi�,ii not applicable,should a.deeded.Sea ORS 93A30. _ z 't•`��"�.^','i',.�,��,y� ,I In construing this deed, where the corneas1 so requires,the singular includes the p.'ureJ end all grammatical g: „ `�.G..t' ..,3-$:&;....v,.,3,1,..1 0 changes shall be made so that this deed shell apply equally to corporations nd to individuals. ' 1,ePi ? y,; STKA- l5+' In Witness Whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument t ? de of 1'.`.t/ ,1995 a klt''''•t ';1»�'J' ..rlq; .• fir r if s corporate grantor,it has caused its nsme to he signed and its if fir r •er or other person s x s{e�4 y*A t sa? 4. ■ II duly authorized to do VI by order of its board of directors. 11 •. r Lf� r-"M•:" f j; KV of 11;I THIS IOS:i TH.S T 1s'ILL NOT ALLOY+ USE CF T-4E PROPERTY DE- '•---••- - - i� h` b.. '- 1' 7t'.' Yn y USE EIHED IN TH;S INSTRU'+ENT 1'4 s'OLA TIO!:,F APPLICABLE LAND Robert D. - • 11 +.+-;)C-4rJti- rti.=.7itt _ _ i U USE La Y:S AN, RETJCATIDti S. EEFO'E S16NI1.G O? •CCEPTING >• '7.1.V,'"7 •'.4• . nSrr'� *4'y ,Ya le U '1 TICS INSTR•JtfcNT. THE PERSCI: AC.. IF:1G FEE Tti CE TO TIIE _ -•.a- •c. 't 7,•.•• °..k. 'l vim• PROPERTY SHDULD CHECK Y:ITi' THE aPrR-`PFIA:E CITY 7R 4 �_ s't'yy�+^ * a ' COUt- Y..e!A+:•1;t:O CEPAR Tv=Ni TD`:EP`FY PYFGED USES. ?; a =�•Sr°• >E'_,,.R:. .''fit �2 J ti 11.11tnmah )ss. 11 ; ---w"R kg .iu 1':'� Sq-P.r • - ATE OF OREGON.County of _ -.... .... I t - Y.1' F.:a•`L',..; `£"' 1 Thrs instrument wog acknowledged before me on...Aagi st..4�a ,19..9,5., C L• i`•; ��'' :,a z .Y,. F ' by.... ... Robert U. Randall , •ci•. * R• •• + ��S This instrument was acknowledged before me on ,19 95, Z vin 1�:- .te-,y,fT+L as Y L Fit r t i•3i -.sue ��1 -... .. N '.� r• �i J>F} OFFI�.ALSE.L , // a 3 ! •�s / M_t'�" WAY DEBARS 7 ...... itf •` 1:2. 1� t!�n.•• N°TAAY mimic-OREGON L�'�L 1 � `i_•J f ( II °"ki'? z r C i s s �' I `� �® "COMMISSION NJ.029877 1 ^ WY COMM!SSIOU EXPIRES NOV 17 1991 NN Lary;'ublic/or Oregr:/1 !t T I 'a Y• r v vr..+ hf y•zmmisston a-pines ( tT:4- .1 t •s x t L re`', +i l? ROBERT D. RAIYIl4IL 1:-1;:s.,...., r z.".' ; .i` si_ - ' ,cf Z STATE OF OREGON, • ; .r s / r gy.Nt:.lit 9500 Sr,1 Barbur Slvd-. Stllte OQ };4, p S? ., ;< . : Yortlan3;"OR 97219 county al. _.._........ .. °'' ra 'x '' 1 rattily that the within instrument 7 4XiT r /•• Gamow',Nvw e•a Ater... ''J�"-�L-'`--'+l ,, • - tr-•,.any iy. '* '.• - pt�• ��r•�.• ii•aa received for record on the ......day +�, ° }• •' `a' k Y r-1.0..x B Iit!�iAk .AA.tie.•1-P.+SS.&.S11�RAGE..L-L.0 - r `9`NJ9* -`,41 • C s If .�3 Ir�a,.. ... of y i'.a1 . �" l'-'4.ti'• .C/O. Corp 9 ,zr i ^w;- 1.,. • .,,;c r.,3s..; x.S " ' .O'clock. ....M.,and recorded in .1 +{` t •.•.. ••�•�,- -`?" Cy. �. p•'• .... s♦•rc•r rr,vco 1 .:r3 E�aj~5�•,.gi ,. 9SQO..SW..lBaxbur.Bivd. Suxta. 30Q.. C ;+yi'1:). e-•••-',N.«e,r ue••.. 57214 ro, book/reel/volume No.... .. 1 t tl '. • y r,;� +,fa•a ? lsorr lanai f R on Fxgs .1 .YaL.20 1 it`f. ncca,ace a Esc and/or r -.++.; '+K S' f ze ., j. AN.reyA:we...R N Pie.,Yi.,,,Vol, ......... .......and or 65 foe/"file/instru• ,� ,:Jy S�t-."•-., a RANDALL REAL1! COI) I. t tii :_pA S{.,•s mrnt(micro/i!m/reception No. I t�s+ r + , F sr/, 95043 SW Barbt r Blvd. Suite 300 i + , , o ' t: 4 ��`� t.. -. .. . Record of Deeds of said County. 'c •ti h e." Portla,Td, OR 91214 : �w, �• +Zs" } Witness my hand and seal of .f7'"}r' s t •-r'.7t is ..�'.,.•a x•• U•Ni...mood M.._:..,I d.5. Oa...Vs r.INe,..,R44,..t.., County ,r.'i red. I f -D t-A'le• kY iTi `d `y EURLJ:tAM Bl1SI.E°o &STORAGE. L.L.C. t Y' s•, 1i. ■��s si•=740r, 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. S.:1te 36'0 • F ;�.. .... 1:- X-E' •a;rL=X• ,jS .tom Portland, OR 972.19 .jg'tt.. - r ....1.+' ,, .�gevt ....... / .Deputy. A.:44,--S cam$ s .+�+'i Ls S a S.,,,t {SAS. ♦ ''"1 .y S ., a• .2... ..Fa XY e. :>t .. t. :.+'Itgj 'uA•^ 54,1'- 'e •k• ..• a!�. .. 42... � Y.A••• ' •`••••71,':F.,'!-:v:/Y.f -.. '�IS.. •,. a eyr• • J.; M a •..".:1•71..•,---:•,..;'S. ee .. i,,t.`..'n. ,-,•1�.l x s -.r ,4 v...(41 w t' ,^,.t^<1s s,! t . �t s> . :.4 i .,<. }i 44 th s-zW.S . ?>• .; �. `Et.-►l'. . G � ._+yN 1 : a Rll.�•.r` •�, .v r.�.•s rr '.;�i.� i ,.•,. �a 1' i rl r,�t1 ii:?!s•Y•041i•1.1ct .t•f`$ `�' 147 .:#r'r fJ•'ij his ct1•44 • ' .�M,r7.%,..ice )ir;•!/�.,r1 y ru.• I• ,...� t!� da., w ii,� `z•,.Arat>lS. .�..:�E-:-x•�rry `.•'O.s�t `V' •r•,- . i s47v'.• stA.` CjtA . ♦ .y .,t'`i•�iJ+ 4�+.k fee 1..A.. "`t • 1 w•e'4 .`� 1�_:. s6 .r•-: .a r♦YC;sv-!.Z+; 's' �R,.'�,,�y.'�►��I•yam!" tr':.,r:•S+'^•T(+4.s3'w�'3,,Sy_'v:,t�•�.�.•.•♦ G."�•.jM.�,.,.,,�,"��y"� -^+ i, 4 :i•• '•' 44.2asw♦.Reel i er.v4',;�••{^4!r• i!f.NtO•;- 1. w�L+:trtss - d .s"..5.. i4�PRn:. sP•�1,. t,••,-. 1;' -f f r �r.r;Y i}.' e.r fib,. i i).•< fir , +'' ,�••.ei=5 2• r ,• r ,Yt rt ..,...�'. .. mss'•• t•' Her ". i e 73 f, r. k 'r••. ,....r i 'st..,-- k "e". -IYw ��y.��'r.: '.r,,y..l�Sr}•r++.�� .. ri'. a<.<a�ri•a-•.[Q����S'�• >�' .�. w>:-•�J.•.t�"t�."�..• yi rl��t l.+.r C •s. ..ri s, .••!--A; ri7 \T,/! 4:i'�A• tjri:.. T.. ti'F '�/'p•, ., t�R'%-:.r ti tiC.:•1.:,. • may• ��'.t'cr Y.•`:� i.. !r, ti � ti: i-�• akr•,r�::. t ;y--,O. . G• "L'. s.. 3 e •� •s: ii°.;- TJ•,A'e,1..-, of-::ii1 :\:: .t �t,f i 'Sa. .�)-}1.. ."ir:��:•�J'i,'",f�j,�`�.�sr4*�i•`•,t�r•+:'t;:'••-M4>'a\S':'•,<•• •�.it1.eE�T.+�.a.r.,, s. .;'r''3'•L:+��AZ.s�°r'�'N •� -... •t. c' .. .• - . • • •. ; •••••• •- • ••-*- • .'• --; -:••••.'''.- :41.:••••.••-•••••••. : : i;............;-..- :r .7 •..,,:,,.?,...1‘.: •,:.". .• ..:...VV V •, . ' • S.t.'"-17,.7.-t• ■-- "..- - -. :• • . •••••• -- , •• . . " • - " 'S=.: . . . . • •. • a• :. • ' •• .-.-.,---,--!.,f,4, •. • - . . . 0.. •- .2....,•-••. • • &. • ., .f.0) - • '.. • ..,1;',‘,.(:..2.',; ., ' . .• ".' -' .' • -, - • EXHIBIT A ,•• ._.f. . ': `,••:-.,'• .:'.• • VV VVVVV VV P .* . . . %. . '.. -‘.1,- - •..all•.•.D.. •' ..-*110 . •- •.': .-..-.- - Real Property Deecriution - . •,,-. • u: • ' • • • ;.;,. . . .• .0-....vo • . :•;:k.•.:-:-..-• . -- Parcel I: • ' 1111Ps; d,i,... Igig .-.::,-.:7-::. -- V-.. ,•.... - • •efti 1":-.....--; . 1g; rii...;.;:-;;„. : Lot 6,BURNHAM TRACTS,in Washington Count'''.Onion• ..:- • '• :--1--**-.-. .:'.•,, - V -•,.'e.' ::':',-';•:.:".":.. • •- • ..-.."--.• •• -. ICI. ., - --7- - '7.- .•-:- EXCErTING a triarigular tract merved by A.H.Ruedy In deed to Wm.G.Thomsen,recorded September 3,1909, . . iv:- - in Book g4,Page 321.Deed Records. .. et. • • ••• -• . • - • - • -• o :.: Parcel II: 4::'..•' •' 1•-_'' a 7c - •-- - ..--:-.-''' A part of Lot 7,BURNHAM TRACTS,a plat of record situated in Section 2,Township 2 South,Range I West, -- -.:.;••-•1".*::-'•''t•e.p-n: '...t.-:.`: .•7 - -:: --. , -7.--.... Willamette Meridian,Washington County,Oregon,being scribed as folk•ws: . •--.. . • . :- _".-.i:•:113••1. ---- .• - :••- .... - BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of said LM 7, said point being marked by an iron rod;thence South • -.. . .. „... 45°34'56"East along the Northerly lint of said Lot 7,a distance of 329.96 feet to an won pipe at the Northeasterly corner thereof;thence South aros•DO West along the Easterly line of said Lot 7,a distce of 162 CO feet to an --• .-.. - - ...-• •.. iron rod,thence leaving said Easterly line and running South 85°53'00"Wee.,a distance of 90.50 feet to an Iron rod; -.: •-•-:•-'..••: - • _.-:it .i. .• ,- .., -. thence North 30°10'30"West,a distance of 237.00 feet to an iron rod;thence North 23°16'40"West,a distance of . • : .•,a."•.-.-,...7-.•S 44.00 feet to an iron rod in the Westerly line of sald Lot 7;thence North 42'02'36"East along said Westerly line, ".:•-• ::•.,-Ii.c.;--- /..:-...1.-.!-7:::: a distance of 149 00 feet to the point of beginning. -•".-t•-•••••°!. -'• :".•••"Irir Parcel III: sw:.• :-.•••.....1....:,,•••••••. •••-•".----: •-•....7.••..;''•:•••r TOGETHER s,title and/or interest which Grantor may hare3fler acquire during the term herr-of :•:.-3.', -•.:...•. .....--'.-::7i.` pursuant to a vacation of public right-of-way,or any other action which shall convey rights title and/or interest to 4 3.4.•;:f.::: 1-,„......,;,......;.,:i4.: • •.•..:--.„..... `4 Grantor,in and to any portion of the following described property: ...,...j: •••,•-j :7...:..,-1 r..Z.1:;■••;=-V;7':::2:;11,....$74: That triangular tract reserved torn Lot 6,BURNHAN1 TFtACTS,in Washington County.Oregon by A H Ruedy •..7:;,‘..:-.'----'-'•-•:-,.-•-•:- •:,:i...:::.',-1. .:::■':':;=.4.::;::1.47:1-- -.1•..=.........•-•_:.-: -ls 7-..:7.- in O.:cd to Wm.G Thomsen.ra...-orded September 3, 1909,in Book go,page 321,Deed Rccorda. '-,,-•,.r. ;,,•-•;:erf.:4-: ' •:: (:: : 1 ■'- .'-• - .■ .. ...."1.,..-...nip. ::.-% .Ii.Z"..'- .,.,,,,,r,...17 C.; :...A.V114;*''''5•V•f'474 -.....•:_-:.::.,.!.1:4 ,s....j't,,,Ii.; v4 1., .....;*". Tz-„, .rt..,.e,..„,.-2' .. .. . .."'"-I•7417:..:44 ."7/..:4,,,4.:74.■ ":: "..t.t.,,,,.'"' t".14X:,:.■,--;.,:r.,29.:-V,..."' k:09;•,_jf ‘:!':•-i•;:r.S.F;;`-.K4 .:,s...:.:.?:::,----;•,r-A;kf.-- :.".e-,Le.' rflti-.!:i..--ilk-.4" si:r.•:•:.:,,;---•=7:,..4,-,r41.7---- g0i6...*.cFV-e;:C'Ef:•12,.... z:z...1••.:::-.•:::•:-;;.•-sttl.:-;t: :4,-*.-••••1:!.."-•°"..,.ti:-.••';:•••••• !'•11Ple '7.i.:A=littl.44 st..st-43 :le .. ,TrF.•••,..y,,...1. .--.--.,..-1,..---...4,,,,t....,-;_a• -444.1.4. ; .•-•1,.'s•-s•J• • 4.1.”,,,..i..."7•:-.-T..:- ", ::TIC•l' ••• ....f:.■.''.....:-.7■•.-..:•;?.Zi?'.:.111.1s •;•.:-!..7.-t7-' .11)71:I.! 'X4:-.•:,f,..:17Z.5e:'-'.;•:•• ;-....,•:: i.....f'-.1"-:::::....,-;_.-1; iltz"... XI.%.•:1-,j..: : 4•.:-::- .--;...:-.:'!"..;.f.J.;, ..---F: ".7n1r.41,4 •..7.:"•:.1..-q..-..?. .;;','..." 41•• ...••:?,‘•.':`. •;.k.irtis••• 3 4.-.,-1,•-":::.,-•••••••;:- •-.--**,:-., .—-•"--•••.-:•..• :..f.;,.144. •--•-1-:'-•:•-:::-.=-- .1..• ::.--".--..:::-.■••l'... --/kr.1',1 4 --..--:. .'•- •dis--:4• • .- -- -;■.*B.:-,1•:;‘,"-4.•;-- ; - .. . - - ...s...,• ..-4 . . '''•::: 1:1 4 :• • -' ' '.-;7114rig; '- • .--,....... ..:.,.:._. _ .• ..-_ ,:.„....... ,. ....._,_ ..._ ••7-,,t 7. 4-410t-,f,41)'... .1.7.';';--.4 7: '';"‘"",,,4.1144 •••-•..'.*:: ..•`..:.!-2.' :-.-.•''''."` - • •••:.,...,.'•: INITIAL ..1';.;:'-r-M ••••;:.-.!.:.;:'-r.■-•-' . l'I'-'.::,,,•••3.••:-;,.1-..:.--4..,..+' . °! - a. • ,0 " 7••••3::1-•.•r..-r0 :.- ......i.:.: :.•:•:. `...N.:-f.:-;-: :- i-'.•:--. :ic' ''..:;'-.4.:'•I'-:'7'...--'::'■.-1-1-'!i.". $.:•..!.;.:. -.:.':...•:-.. ,. / .,..m...y_.. y;:.•!......-..-..•:-..•;:t. ;..ittr.•-:er'•- w-,„:.••,,z•II:Z-‘:.• •:.;-'-'..--..•..; ....?.. .- .:: ;.%,...:!..-..•••-;••• .....,,,,,:•,:„....... ...-.2-::.,...•.•;•:,..:-.-7...•:: •.•.,Z'-.4",•,:kits.•-,_..,:-,J.*...,,,.• i':`,".-..,::,-....."'-:-...;:fr.--.; ••■_-..--4-•-e• ......- ...;-,::.. v ......-.i...,,,,L...„ 7 ,....;:.....-:,.:,,;. 1z4......,..,, 11,..,N." ,..:-..:-.:•.,,-.....4, '.".".?•:::.7.'.::: ILD r,■••7 o t.o,ft V" )1.."..:7:C.04.1:•...'r:k...2: ..,654;;4"Y17:::■?%...I.Y..11A: ,4,..........::;:i.J.:,....;-.7■23.141.:,:s. .:117t......'".:.3.2:e•::4"..::■•• .t...'"e;t''''';41;:.r-4:-..e.....:2-4..1..: ..24I4-7:1•Aal.vp-I:--4://t.•;.: t'-'•:.:7;••••-•:••••.`t :.•:',1* f; '•;•saP'=;,•,-.ti'...-..0'.-/••••- ...- •:.2-•-:,•-• •%•••: ---7 y..,*--.:.•,...,-- •:-...-.,• - ..-••• -,:-.0..:?.....ki.:4,,,,....:;..sAz.......1 .::,11-•:...:*.•:::,. .;=2'.1:•"*..*;;t•-.4.1'1' .:7i..,-;-..17.v•••:.-...-:.,::-.-: ..-,-;.-:.;.....:'••:-1.1:•4:--...,itk.E.e.at.1, ...--,.• • -c.v.,.-4-0.4..:-..,• A.7:13;:.-sz•2?-1r:"..--,v 1••••tt:-:•-',.--.444,0iiigikkr..44-.4V 7; •••:ts.i.0.--.•'-' '. ; 4-e ... .,....v..,-•• ,:-.:-..--••••••,.. .4,-.••.:?...:••,.•••-.- .,•-...- %.. --,. . ... ...;:i..4.1.4.7%f:eq1/4:iriiiltis• ".■-:.:::. •'.--.1•%,'••?'-".--:1';',.).•fr-• ,,..., 4,-.... •.....,....,f- ..:,,417..... :NA,,...PiPPs, ;704•Pmftg., 1?)2ilheir•Vi4- , . ... • . 'k;o0,:lt..:4--,-.':•?:i.:1.•icf,;N.::.. -.;•::-- :-:.,-..,2,..-. - •1/4::-=.:::•-..! -v.. ---••'•,'4.,,•-t.N.i è. -.;.::::::.;• . t,;•f..•74::,1"1:..Ni.•...7.r::...,..,...,-.s.p.;14!::I,,..i,:iiv?,::,-,,i.-..„,,,,A.,v7..;,;-..,......-,;....,. •........14k,,,,:!.-.....:i...;.the. , ,..*,4,...-x.p.i.. :1.1-.:.:;.2..-.:•,-.*- ....,.-•...4,,.. •.... ,•.. q,..",....),-...-It.f.,,,,t.:,i..s.:,,,,..,. ;,...:„........,....,_...,..-.,.. ...1...w, , • ., - ,.. ,............-....:. ...e..4,-..,.....iiiel,yri.....•.-.,•R).............. :.....:.,•:...:....,iwg,..1,...."........,.../,...‘„,-,,,••.,„.......,..."•-...,%. ,,..... .14:°*;•.:4-ne'°-l'."-'.4k;"''''tz 1••`"...it,' •;:iikikt:CV 1-. -••*".tat'+`•■'...!4%k% -:"..-'%.*-A..cs,Z:-'''....V1.::1.4e.--,=4,--::1.-tir.D.4,__-•-;.1.5.‘-ili:=Yte':7r-Y.•';:.'.-' .",..;-*!-A•••-•t"-U..:::F.-itVP':•"X-44'.....d.- •••,..-;:..,.!,=;.•:.! ,1;;;;-.V.:14;:zecr...31-',..:1•41.=:7:;.f...):!,-.*:- .•._;1.:: ::,•.-*•;,:ti:•;":.;*.-.;!4.-eTr.,_(,.-4r.Y:,1.":14.:TV*24::il'ict.e.t!iir'4‘44.',•74.1.,4.;":"4::;;::.:wr;$1.45:ii71,..,-4,.,.•ca: ,:::•••••".----., ;',....;:i.ri.4.1.4f41:-.,i).•;.•:',*.f :4--:;.;-!;*.•.:::!.%.t.4.*,•.,:s::..'-"...-.:-..i.:-.1.;7:,4$4):;•--.7:::1•4:--.4. i•::;ri.t;. `•:0.:,..-.;•''...".::•;:::::i;•-:•••;;;44•-•es:71**:.*:-'.4.;:-:.; %-••,,-:,!.... 04..::-..5-'40.-,:•.::;-, .••••:-......:.:! :'..).:1::4`-yilfi.•;..*::.:,..ZiAlf,i:F4-ttr?:•:V41::`.4;:;i19---:•.T.t..:;:, :::-;• +-3.4,ii,"-::::::Se.;•;;:..:.•.:.1.I;',;••••::-:a-F.-'-"?.-.•-•••■••••&-•! ■■• • • •t! •s•'. • if •...jytr,V ...7.‘ • ,;„.,..•.,• b7.,.'0 •ky...,•%.,, „:. 1, „4 , .,•41, -,., k..AX•••".:,op/le... i".,,,k.:(4.141.. tit :;.4.4t . .4.14, .....;„.kiktc. '' 4,414.4)-,,-„6,11,414.1.,0%.4.4,4g.TV y.,..s• 4••••,‘";4-'• ;.4'..''''.:.i...'.‘;:i.'').''';':',•:.'•,'':;4`4'i.....:1:41..,1:1,i:144.! '.0:411,44!■=ki$1;2:4.0i.41 ,14.1t11:7:ikai'API i tr164:70$141,01fif$5t4'.4%,,,f1 ,i(2.. ..1!...r..,4111-`:•.01,•;;.4.0",14:9 -77: ',y,r,...74. sli;44.4■.i.tx.p,...4•VVI.r.ii:,v,••••,..1,2 4,41,4,..,,gasti.,,,y4t,v+,A...ft.,,,-,p,., ..,-...;,;,-, '.... -tilf,..:••• ::•fr-!......h..:: ,I. .::...*.•L,',..cr-,1.4.-0,.1:40,-.0,1':q4itt.N, 4V•IWiiri:--'-'1:.r.l.:40-44V411;,:p4,..4•;:'NIqtre.A1v4...° Viiet744441,Zfria41...%L.'`1:1:A!;Peb".41:)11.4•••440:475.4.4 ;Z-Slig Itti,14,11._11010-fAM.:3r., --i0L1.--ti-011._lit;e:TiY.•Z‘(.44.) it,,..,•■•,'..•..,": i •;'::-%..:•,:' ' f5i;.?;!,::'. l'.:-;',1..•.; .1;44', lic;!4,1;, .''.rep•I;AV:..tA4;:.44;i4.0.14.41.thite;.-et•41:3?:,fi.Z...ci.n.;'' ');.•.X4-19'41•A1.4::11,gt•Fi44.4:-.51.5.V,..,§41,1?;414.1:4;tlftP1•.;2514•40..7491401*-WIT.4.-214":411.74'.e.f7v1;r• I, -;-: .",.';. .*..i.. i 2".'.4 p';':::::.:.). .4 i;:lt;: g::.;i-"X,, 4.41ti4:Atos:riik*/;;;.4 e•t4‘4% ,,i;•glea:1.0.4.44;1:44.11.161i4,1%,11':04'4!":,,,.'Vktsig,k11.,-1`Bni.t.-1.1;1:10K::"4.k..viON'aitlt 1,-■'7ii.V..tr!ellia.V•45ft0..tirtkeetilk,';;I: 1 ...:',; :..:„ .-.•-)2.:.;`.....r,f,..••.i,•4;..• 'V,to,t.':,*;','7i..!:-...,c_4.%:,fit.',-:-.1.(itizitc.'L'41..,44L_,.".. ...:`::-,--, .iitfe,A15••••,'',"...t..7.); 44'...4%:.-1-44•214.•41 .4.'.. •.S.!•••;,':.v...,IP,'.11'....I•tig:k•*4.4414'. 1 601.e.i or-t.,.-'40,ieuv..f..alt:4:"../V,FP:le.trtf4fr oir•440;14.z..:Itykr-gt.liP,41;;• .f*:,•••••,1 .;'.. .."-:.::.. .'r...1-. :••7•7-''.......i;.•:•!••••'wf•••••Apo■ftlitPst.4!P•10$'44;*45?-.... -.411.0.$4.C11„ 'i . •-."'', •*" ' .' •,,•1 ' ,',.' -•,•',/'.• - • ,-<-1.,.:-.4,.4..e.,,!,...,, ..,'.,-:,'-,- '.':,."."-', ,• -",t; •1*.•41 I 7,R.7;. •rg".t4..i ,..., .,...::., •,..•..:,;•......'„..;:l .,.......;•4.0..:,...;-,;.;;44t.ii,;',4:14:A•'/;:t.,,.,q.111.fttikke.it,W,Ar.%\v37/Pai'Nfh ' ''''...-tV tilt,"' 'A,' $',,.'1'''' Ift.tr.:Y.,i,Te,..(-': . ,vig.‘ .,-„r?.;• ..; 3-')%.,..• 00,1.„:;,;,•;.2.41;.. iii.;eti....744,1:44C -•••••---• ... •-•'. I'••3.. .. t•-•kr?..•..."1: ••••.':-.!..7:1.,-;:t.t...4:;;;.0..e.,.74.01,-Notitril.4).ty,L,r,w,.4,.;,,,,•_...4-44,0,1,1,, c.,,,,,.j r,4.,J„._, i,.;ta.p.-.0. .. -,..4.-.v .41.:,ft..,...4....,,vt•.,3xt.i, ,,,,.40-,:,..A,I,,,,,,x.A.,t,,:...t.,,,,.,.., „:„.„..kik....4 ......•.•• •• - • -.1.........:•.r,....I . •••• •.•.4,•,,,,,-.1,..x,..........,t,.. ...,074,...;•4,,,,,„,3.,,,i6,--..0.4,:v itt.,•12..4.. , t.,:,1%.,,,,,,,,,....0- .;7,5. ., ,,,,„...,,c4..nstAl• „,..,.,,L.• .„ .3 , .T i. ,. kl...e-A,s,„,„iii,,, .„.. - ,,,,,,,f 4 Niii...0,e...,.■,,,[440...,,,,„. 40,.7A.04,44„,„,....pu •• ... 4...1.•••PXY 10:0A4.14.14,.'a'tl,*),, ,/I ,Sg....141'0, "14-Vte.ti.^6.t.i.t..;....rr 5.7,1-t'.4...•:...'''Pel..• •till■••.1.4.',....■'''S4te 1.'1,411 '-,',..let' ',S.; s'iri) ;s4(**5'''*44•4*-;4'44,..444..•b. .' •' ,• ..`•N 4.0.l.•. • ),s..;1:0,eAteTA.CfP4',,........V:AIW44.: ‘..1".' re.41.* * "Tz*** **t"riNV'tt ' '' * ." "4.-"'....4' 1.434k1.' i64•tru'ltls'N,C4c*vt. ?/4•11FV1* '''A*4.4t,"i",*),•4.1,4tf4,.,..1.: 4‘.,1::::"*.t4g0*. ' ):•-s-.14'?;,!;!'':: 4%0;"4.-.4•••••••,:.., ,.••y., ', 111$+.44110,4 ft.t.14.71:44.,4:41:44.V 4,01:N.i, •1..:4.-'' .v.:1....s.„ .t.,,,.....,.rt4,..k.k.• 4.''•*. - . . ,.OLII,k,...; •ii);k471}1,:iito.....••=14.,4".Ar. +."-••'ir'l- ....e.r ,' . i7 6 A ,u, ° 'Xriat,wn.4.tg-IturP,341F:to...i,* 1.1+1'.4.,,, 'Odit-i.i 4 "'silo'‘.,044,-itta.TK z Alit,..i•ev.V.,: _ s:-...h?..k.,k.,,4v-.14,1,441:‘,4444;Litc,14.-.0. ,..........-,..fis:..,-,..p. Ii. st ,. c$;.,5,i.,...7.:,,,,,..1 ,.4,45:g..,40.0.*- .*., P...;,..,.::),:. .... .f.,..1.. ., ,..",,.„. 4 r:It?e,,,....liji??,..;:r%/74.,.....3:::!,:left.31:r4:1: -• .1.•:•!..i.:•,.- : 2 73• -k .• - .gc. ‘,4f4fr 41.-:'•'.;!...••••?:•,...: ...rr ..t.'...... , .0 ,.-1;;I :.' -' ° . 1,10 ,,i c,.. ..„..1..r." .1. A...,:e4li•.(e--.41 .1.i.-.....,r...., ..5.7.) ••..;„): y„,...:,,..,., • /1.10,....4. r,ry.r■•••••ri . .1*.V.t.,•:'.n.-',•.:?' .1.-‘74•4%-.1z.v. ''..z.I: rs ,,,..4..k$11.1./.0.•._,,,4.. ,...1:44•frth 1;...;:g:ei:sVii: S8 ts ..%,:, 4-i..!?...ii* 0 14 •,-44.fr.:AILIA1,,,,c4.,.4444...it. m"-1... ,,,,.. ...„.:„..2%lcie.f.t)'•••._• . - ..Tft* Ln G a 4.,..e• :,,./47??'17:444',4 V.4.62' '' r•V ',;;;;Tit.40 Itre.iri • -z' et': 0 r•in••• 0 v.1 i',AlfIldc._1;4!).:5?.4.4/../X.L.v. i '■r. •Ai.?*,,It•■•11:v• 0.: •.%;i: :: (..4. •••• '2.-- :,,.>.,..',.. g 1..* miTrtt-P, ••••7',11:w-wl•• %.... il.:,..--tr...=..?Av-; 0 ; t.....i.. , •,e i., ,;„-,..5,..,. 0.,,en .i45.)0i. 10' ., '4'34'41#., ,41.1,.,,A:."1.teAlq.::itii•'(.7:4, ..,...... 'v.-:::.• 43. •B " 4 ., .11-dr 1:42; .4 S t "Acre' ... z• cf.....-. ■ ZaemP..114.5r*,‘,"•!‘'-v.aur, ''..I.:/'10.:61,!yea-11.1,1, r:`•':44%.•,.... ,...:.1... g -,-6 g •• ••ON .744.YRY.V7 AtO`AilAkt.,."`'.' ki Telle1.14(:120 ',14 fr....,.., :.,..■ .c .I)•4 gggh ,., ,..... g„.4.. 0.-44, AtigTv ri...,e•.../ ;7:•7*.T.loirtlivi.,. .........--•-‘.:•.',••. o v co 7..41:4'.. .:' -'-2K-• - )-• f.rted.fi 11144.r. .. .,... , , 0 c4 o , ...i.% ... , •va.p.),,,..kriel.: >16;:.I.' . 0.,,• c t:7 . .a"r VI,....., .a•:l r-......:%10:1`;:s.:44.4.M.0 :.).•.t:. .*:, .: • ' -,.. ...; ---- • • •pifj,*--„*.ii,e t.:::.:--.:N.•'. .' *11 '•.' .%.• ' -fk ''..• ' 4" tr. ""liaP vArA Z.S.k....., %./441-4,1;1,4_Xlmtr 1'.. r.:e...t• "e7, 41::;1.1.14:.;a4.ei . ..s.ertis..,..... •f••• 4%.4,•tap t%If '40.,' •.41MIFAVI34('''".."".t.":1. ":A hliet:1: . .•vi.to,,,..ef: 0,7,!..t or I ,:*• .: :. .--'. ; • •:-.:..i- •:- ::...P.:I:NI,.,:::-..4;tAr•0 .44.-•4•tv,,,,, r ...;.:..• .--.•' s.,•••••04---;:z.-4;te,-.4-1:. -..* •i-:• • I .14.„..t.....e..A. .. . 1., 4, ,, ..., ,. • • . . ...:::,, , .. .:: - ';:q4'4*Tie..,,Alffilo'•'4 4-°.4: •• 4.,-1.:JM,_?,&4•44,1:t.:01.2 .,,,'•:1' -.: **‘•"1".::::%..'0:" 4.7:•;;.4r453i• . .•11:!••••V 1 ....-Nlik...!...[•0"..,...,,,,,04.0• ..,:. P ..0 eilies.R.. "%Pk: • .1. kJ...I-fee...,r.• 4.7.1,...titi. .t1,..• :.4.-.;?'"XV•i. • •,;',::•;%!..111:.' •:,..,.),PA4.4...0kt,1:4 111'....4-et.y.w..v....4....-..t.s.11..■-:,4 plo., ' .1 :141:... 4"..1.4:... 4?*:,04,1;ii.foi),y-vt.l.P.:42:•$.4‘.1":4; • •:-.).:e.•'; c 4.1. ., ‘:4.*11."-•:-.•""• .1's•%)*,,:its.)%if.4-.4f:■04102(...r ',741 P.. r." •"•(.%;* 1 %II:A:4:..„•;.44.r:.•51„...-,1-A . . 4- ., 7, ... ■?::t 3 4 itInfilie24.5:09:4.7:eitirdi■r":. ..,. 1 j';'.<17.,y1N4Tillkitt Yortr,Nt4%.,!‘ .* a'I'•j% '1..0/4'v..1;4•4,,/•441.3cr•..., ;4,,. .."..., .e, u'olir•• ■•". ....0.11.44;41‘...4::t4W44 4•13' ..4 ...1 •il;if Iti• ..'^nf'•%■414•1414Atcf.k.N.'N. II.,...,,,..!, ' .I•ii1. ;:f".:/.01:).r. S.....4fil iV•t e •44!%-.c.‘"V•re,•; %).,J.„41. •.•.; -.! •,••‘. . .0.. 0,,,A,lit,,,.:::, • '...',...../,..:.:4: ;.,.......,.;,:,....; Wrifi:,..i'AiT-1•%;:c.;stitsir.10.•0',"•-:7 i-i..*:.' ,1%.,,...,.....„.••:. lAss.'.,.-43.stztkriolkalve,Iri.., ,'.. . .".•-••••.-.--•-•.1-. t..-.4,1t.eIre..•.14 . .....N.d• •tic, 1. .0•t.r.I.V.."- .0.•44,...... ,,,r,.., •.4. *1,14,71.-: .4._; ,..te:11' itkii.,•4 !.....-'-e.'444. '',3-'. 41. .V...:•.:'... /•.... 4'. l't1.4illitt*t$P,q1Aril..9 . 4 .. .. •R'1:0Zil.,:}Z Ar...-••••••NNY 4..1•''' ? 4#4 ••:;.‘•••.:• .. '".' ....f.....:, •f Vete;4.(t• •t'''.;••••••.4... '. 4 11,4feri; 3.1..416.141•44",11 '7441.4 •:.■,•••••,..;•1.: -•4^4:•-.4.,-: rin. 1/2:.-4-Itii.:14A1-• .eetifeit F,..,....17. 4.%,..tik: .9:12..4k...,hr uPYLI• 1:04i..;...... .. . .• . . •4/'4:54U,.i. ti,*.iiht_Az,,,..;,v,..4y...-4,,Vp..4.a _1../.fp.f. ;;;,,...„. ,. . ,.-...,--..••••••I.. •-.0,-..•,..•.:, - : . • ,;:•••••••••4,41.-„...14. •,..“...,....,,: • ..I.,• .. .1.....,..v,.,z.,,,,,, . ,•• ... 4.3 .3,... ■• ....t.,'..,'. ....•:t...••• ....'•1.,`,4.• . •f- I•.'• ', '•:. ;4.'11.4*V.,,,,:y?;4404.:•".44••■•v? %:%-t4!/'.S1,104r4r.k q r el ...,..i. twoel„oy r• 'tti:r-3,.e..P41 Ar.....,,,is..2?% .11..),„...,,..,...,v.,.,i, „..,.:.. t.r:;,..01,...:,:ciA,,,,-;‘,.=.1:....zwrov.41, :!-..tt.::.-..,,:.f.::,,...:1,....::..:..,....;,..!..;:i. ,, „ );:iwtstii.?.,41„,,ply..44,..4.4,704:0..,yi,,4s. ,-,f,tof:egit ... 40.,,tr. 1.440;....,.,..i',,e,.;,,...ek.,....!...,ee,,..."1'.'it:f.i:x:044;ilaz:::-Ak-,.i.?1,.■xviV.... ;...4,4)si. .:.....,....,....6:-..y.-:.......i.......t.-. . 001 0 G m v ...„..11-6,..10,,,;%,.,1-:(ilefq:1461.4,.i.,:pt;,.&..,...n,N...6,,,re..4.(4.,.;,t, ::.,..414,..:11..b.„,,,r,r,t,.74,......z.L....,,,,,,,N.4_,:,,,,i;:.,:;:::::::r.i.,..31•:/,':4;6 p,?:140,10/..44440f:L..ptg.v.....,..$.74-74,-A1,...p '.44.-••..• '.••":::•'r•,• .!.441,:,;.".., . •••••t 1.4.,t1"'id."•ele,stii•4.1.4'74%14;4.1/4ey/O'Aikbetti)', Ni. 4 17.0.0.t),10461.41$*•0V.Ilt.IPLIfyli',F,;;?..•,■•;:f,..,.!,..7t..1fr,r•Vt.41.,44 s 1,144.:41.. ,‘ 1•3,A.:,,fTc..'Isietlet ...,A,Prit, r•Iti .....,7.•:t.e...•,;•:,...:',:F.:„..,.: .f....; -•.,J••..':.:;;',;f '...:::...,r!'Pl.:AI:RV VA‘,7#1 16 i-P!.:,,t).X;1:1.9..:fittl.i7Nri...2k# •<••,. pe,.714:=:IVI4reci"?1::JaS14.1"":'4":"*.:7%)gr::::4;.;;11'.:1J1'.°1...t.A4114.'''''14?,:, 40a-1 I i ItOe'141ine;Alp "" ." 14;t',;!•:".::`!,:':';...,;••• .•-7 j::?:'''P',..: '41.•-.7.-,1:::•-•;;;.%::‘?;%!;:l.i.t.,i..e.10: 7-:',A1?,;'..14:ti(;rotik,y-t:,-..1.0.::::41t4.4410Alitik:TiVM4Y44;iitt:44:ye474,ci■;:`;s::::Ye,titirli;r:shfr,ft:g1...41,;P ' (.41e.W.11;414214f.+114g-tv:541, ::4Prt?...1%43.1tal:1!"'el ;.:;,:i..1:•,%..i.t1!•:-..'..e.... .sit:i-.,.. 0 .‘,..-0........4,,044.;,:::::,61....,...:mil.....1?4.1,f::A4-0,.., :ol7;2;,,ir.t.,t,1/„2.9.1:70.4,..14.rtr.AiLAito:it**-::,: p.';:s'....4-,::z:;:..kw:.#,-;4.-../.:.:; zits:-K,4,6:,,-,:i$A-.-it.::16,44.,4,..• 1,,,i..'i:pttzt-rt.i,7:,,4 :-..,e.,),,,,.........: ;,-.7..,,,i,:„...,.:.-.(,.:1:.:::.4. '....:: .1..'....,' :!:::;,;trr.,.. cs:41.1.1.4f.i.,p,f,....e:i,,,..f.10.*';Ars... $.4;:la`41 ' ,. Itowl,,ita.40 •4445r.,pilxv,,A4t.‘s:rhk,.0:=:::.]:i.i-vif,.:43*,1,E,!:,1,4`.t:!i4;',.,.:-,,io,;;;;;'"ty:44%`...71.,t`r-4-k.1",,../1":24). !!!...54:4r44.s. 4.'",..."..,...-'1.4..Y.-: ,:i-c*-:::::0*:-.::..;.t.-,..c....V.:..''''',l'..!`;','N'.41:'..1,:i•:1.6.7;: tf••••'i.•1.•;:k.Aletv414X4.41 4 4 v.-e,. ' ,'0.4, r....",,'.4 4 ...e. *"....4 1.k1 "'..".....".‘':4 .*jv"4".. .'r.'' .."''' ". .'. - :' % " **s - " . - •,P..' '.''•:.'•'•"'•:".t•.1 1■::..4 ,--•-• •• 4- V'?'" ' 4 •• - • • ••• 3 , . . • . Propôsf/Na rr& vQ il ATTACHMENT 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Nextel Communications (Nextel) seeks to expand its Pacific Northwest Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR)network to include the proposed Bonita/Burnham site. The proposed site is located at 8900 SW Burnham Street in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Central Business District (CBD) and has a Central Business District Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposed communications facility would be located within an approximately 640 square foot lease area in the northwest portion of the parcel. It would include construction of a 100-foot monopole mounted with three (3) omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 115 feet to the tips of the antennas. The equipment for the Nextel facility would be located inside an existing storage facility. The 100-foot high monopole tower would be located outside of the storage facility and a chain link fence would surround the monopole and lease area. The storage facility space would be used to house radio transmitters, receivers and other essential equipment. Mounted on the storage facility will be two, small receive-only Global Positioning System (GPS) antennas, which are 2"high, 4"wide and 4" long disks. One of the antennas would be operational; the second antenna would be for backup purposes. One test mobile antenna would be located on the cable bridge leading to the tower. It is low gain, is 4" high, 8" long and 4" wide, and is used for testing purposes only. A six-foot high chain link fence would surround Nextel's monopole. Nextel's equipment will be remotely monitored for fire, smoke, intrusion and AC power failure by Nextel's 24-hour electronic surveillance system. The facility may be expanded in the future to include one additional onmi-directional "whip" antenna pointing upward. Alternatively, future expansion could include up to twelve (12) 1' x 4' directional sector panel antennas, which would replace the three to four "whip" antennas. Future expansion may also include up to two microwave dishes, eight feet (8') in diameter, mounted at the 60% and 80% levels. There is no anticipated change to the dimensions of the equipment shelter. Expansion of the facility is not a certainty, but is dependent upon customer demand and/or technological change. Also in the future, it is anticipated that other wireless telecommunications providers would collocate their antennas onto the Nextel tower at an undetermined height. The proposed facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses. Due to Nextel's extremely low power, this facility will not be a source of interference with electronic equipment, including radios, televisions and telephone transmissions. Non- interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) regulation of radio transmitters. The site will be unmanned and, therefore, will not require water, sanitary sewer or management of hazardous waste. Access to the site would be from SW Burnham Street. Minimal traffic would be generated during the construction phase while the crew is traveling to and from the site. After construction is completed, there would be approximately one visit per month by a Nextel field engineer for routine maintenance. 1 Nextel and ESMR Nextel is the largest domestic operator of ESMR systems in the United States. ESMR is an advanced form of wireless communications, which offers a combination of features and services not previously available from cellular telephone or other wireless communications companies. The integrated digital communications system includes mobile telephone, group dispatch and data transmission. Digital technology allows up to six times the number of users than does the current analog cellular telephone system, thereby reducing the total number of communication facilities by making each facility more efficient. Like cellular telephone calls, ESMR calls are handed off from one facility to another as the caller moves through the area. This allows for reuse of a finite number of frequencies at low power levels. Need and Purpose of the Proposed Facility Nextel is continuing to build out its Pacific Northwest ESMR network, in compliance with the requirements of its FCC license. The need for a new site is dictated by market demand, capacity, coverage requirements for a particular geographic area, and the radio frequency hand-off from one site to another in order to achieve the objective of seamless communications coverage. Once the need for a new ESMR site in a particular geographic area has been established, Nextel's system engineers identify a target area, or "search ring,"in which to locate the facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by a propagation study. This study evaluates the expected radio-frequency (RF) signal from the proposed site at a given location and height. The RF signal must be strong enough to provide adequate coverage within the coverage area. The selection and design of a specific ESMR site is further refined by considering local topographic and geographic factors, tree canopy, buildings, mountains, water bodies, the ability to mitigate the antenna support structure's visual impact, compatibility of the facility with existing land uses, and the ability to negotiate a mutually beneficial lease with a landlord. Because ESMR signals must travel in an unobstructed path from the facility to the user, the presence of any one or all of these can negatively influence the quality of transmissions and reception. The height and location of each Nextel site is, therefore, based upon the ability of the site to effectively function despite those obstacles. The purpose of this particular site is to provide coverage in Downtown Tigard. The proposed facility would "hand off" calls to Nextel sites in Tigard and Sherwood areas. It is crucial for Nextel to have adequate coverage in this part of Tigard in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. APPROVAL CRITERIA The following narrative meets the approval standards within the City of Tigard's Community Development Code. 18.66 Central Business District (CBD) Wireless communication facilities are permitted in the CBD zone as a Communication Service in the City of Tigard (18.66.030.g). There are no minimum lot requirements or setback requirements for a nonresidential use in the CBD zone (18.66.050). Height requirements for a wireless telecommunication tower are not to exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users (18.152.050B.4). The proposed Nextel facility would be located on the Burnham Business Storage property. Existing landscaping on the property meets the required 15% landscaping standard (18.66.050.A.7). 18.32 Impact Study The proposed use would not have an impact on public facilities and services. A portion of the existing public storage facility will be used to place the Nextel monopole and equipment. The entire Nextel lease area on the property, located on the northwest portion of the storage property, would be approximately 640 square feet in size. The site is an unmanned facility and will not require any services for water or wastewater treatment. In addition, because the facility is unmanned, and not for public use, there would be no impact to the transportation system, including bikeways. A Nextel technician would visit the site approximately once per month for maintenance purposes only. 18.84 Sensitive Lands Sensitive lands are defined by the City as lands potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, or steep slopes of 25% or greater and unstable ground. The proposed Nextel facility would not be located in an area designated as a sensitive land (see Attachment 4). Nextel proposes to build the site by utilizing the existing public storage facility, which is elevated, and more than 50' away from Fanno Creek and associated wetlands. The site's location and proximity to Fanno Creek and any associated wetlands is discussed below in section 18.85 Water Resources Overlay District. 18.85 Water Resources Overlay District David Evans and Associates (DEA) conducted a field investigation on August 7, 1998 to determine if the proposed use would be located within the Water Resources Riparian Setback (18.85.030 - Table 18.85(1)). The study determined that no wetland areas are within 50 feet of the proposed Nextel facility (See Attachment 5 and elevation on Site Survey—Attachment 6a). 18.98 Building Height Limitations: Exceptions The proposed use is an unmanned facility, and is not used for human occupancy. Therefore, the use is not subject to the building height limitations of this title. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening Based on discussions with City staff during the pre-application conference on November 13, 1997, no buffering or screening provisions will be required. The proposed Nextel use would be located on a small portion of the existing public storage facility that currently meets the city's requirements to provide buffering and screening on the site. The proposed Nextel facility will locate its equipment inside an existing public storage unit, and will not require any ground mounted equipment screening since the shelter will not be visible. The proposed use does not involve construction of a new structure, and does not change the use, which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements, or change the access requirements (18.100.015). 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas The proposed Nextel facility would utilize a portion of the existing property that is used for public storage. The site would be located on the northwest portion of the property (see Site Plan — Attachment 6b). Visual clearance requirements are not applicable to the proposed use. 18.106 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Approximately one vistit to the proposed site would occur for maintenance purposes only. Nextel proposes to utilize an existing storage facility to place the equipment inside. The current public storage area provides sufficient parking for the proposed use. The existing on-site parking provision exceeds the minimum standard. Therefore, no parking or loading requirements are applicable to the proposed site. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation The proposed use is an unmanned facility and will not require any new vehicle access and egress to the site on which the Nextel facility would be located. Access to the site will be provided by the existing public storage facility. As mentioned above, there would be no significant circulation or traffic impacts to the existing use. Approximately one trip to the site per month will occur for maintenance purposes only. 18.152.50 Wireless Communication Facilities The proposed Nextel communication facility is a use permitted subject to the Director's Decision. The proposed tower would not be located adjacent to any off-site residence to M require any setback for the tower. The accessory equipment would be placed inside an existing public storage facility. No landscaping would be removed as a result of constructing the facility. Aesthetic, Setbacks, Height, Lighting The Nextel monopole will appear in its natural non-reflective gray finish. Landscaping or screening around the equipment shelter will not be required because the equipment will be located inside of an existing storage facility. There are no setbacks for a wireless telecommunication facility in the CBD zone, and there are no off-site residences adjacent to the site. The proposed use includes a 100-foot monopole tower, which meets the 125- foot height requirement for a multiple user. The tower will not be lit, unless required by the FAA. Neighborhood Meeting On behalf of Nextel Communications, D. Garvey Corporation held a neighborhood meeting on December 9, 1997 at the Richard M. Brown Auditorium in the City of Tigard. Community Involvement Team (CIT) representatives and property owners within 250 feet of the site were invited to the meeting. A public notice sign for the meeting was also posted to the property. There were no attendees at the meeting to discuss any issues or concerns. Documentation for the Neighborhood Meeting Notification Process is included with the application. ATTACHMENT Ea SITE SURVEY Not to Scale 1 ,� I I ile 1 , 1 I9Nicnina 30V801S-IMWI 1 1 / ..s ,<.),_ � x / d! 1 /I QQ x '`i . Y m I t d/5-,,/d at?l i a� 1 ) I 9NIal1n8 39V 801S-INIW w 9Z'cc .3 cv O '�cv i �E 4 r OS) v' 3 .l XZl 3,6 N W 10 0046, q1,� 1 'o, 0 ti'Yv)o ,l) N ' 0d; 1 dyers & / `tf2sif' r - - - - - - b x 9S'Of l j L 00'6171 J3 „l0 ,9£ .17i? N - O NOTES: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS SITE NUMBER: OR0104 (1) PLAN SHOWN IS A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF LEASE AREA. BONITA - BURNHAM DATE: 8-17-98 (2)THIS"EXHIBIT B"MAY BE AMENDED OR 8900 SW BURNHAM REV: CHANGED AT ANY TIME. TIGARD, OR 97223 Page: 1 ATTACHMENT 6b POLE EXISTING POWER--„a....4 PRELIMINARY EXHIBIT "B" Not to Scale Ip II I ; EXISTING UNDERGROUND GATE �" ROUTE OF POWER ROUTE OF ACCESS i ANfl__IELCO. SEE _ .S _ _ ® I _ _. ,.,_ P.L• 3?g'_C`f. _ — BLDG. A BLDG H BLDG C EXISTING GRADE [ , o 6 o CHANGE J J r — ,. �-E x:v. -o ci: c/ cr H I n • O n <O I o u 0 Z 0 ac~n chn LOT7 U ' +� •x i ■ �► w w w ( a a t . EXISTING EXISTING a(c.- �: = ° �' FENCE POSTS. ' ix,` GRAVEL EXISTING EXISTING �• ,, GRASS ` GRAVLED )17 GATE �7 -.. • AREA P.L. 45'-0"f , i.. •.' `.. • EXISTING PEDESTRIAN EXISTING, /7.PATH. ARBOVI 1 AE (1 YH) (l. ? 9 EXISTING -. � ..- AZALEA (TIP) , EXISTING JUNIPER (T iF'j NOTES: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS SITE NUMBER: OR0104 (1) PLAN SHOWN IS A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF LEASE AREA. BONITA - BURNHAM DATE: 8-17-98 (2)THIS"EXHIBIT B" MAY BE AMENDED OR 8900 SW BURNHAM REV: CHANGED AT ANY TIME. TIGARD, OR 97223 Page: 1 Z (3) ANTENNAS O FOR�T1ONAL INFO O _ --I SEE.Ark D � m (n - 261.16' AMSL Mgr Z Z �� 114 16' AGl mm X w ITI CO 0 = m0 - � * D Z N Z 07 -1 0 -< > z 0 'O - 247.0' AMSL ,m D 111 11-0 100.0' AGL m =D w K • n m m DX (9) FUTURE 12•• X 48' MI PANEL TYPE ANTENNAS D o 0 ® O m W IFAV 73 0 o a I i O ,� FUTURE OMNI ANTENNAS O �Ijl (DOWN. 3 LOCATIONS) SEE ~ 227.0• AMSL iii ANTENNA MOUNT PLAN ,21 o Y 80-0 AGL ® T FUTURE MICROWAVE • ' �/ * ,o ANTENNAS I;, Z ii N I I rn co so 00 X o i 1 r1 D =I- (. Om ;�'� O o Z r - � r' H D D s D O �', T C) ` I 207.0 AMSL I' N I r W 60-0' AGL I, -< 3 C C ANTENNAS ill ii l! m m /v X Z n _ A I 'w O ' -{Z I11'ij = CO n 1'', III • ;II. - 73 0 u) j, 1 100' SELF-SUPPORTING Cr''' m Z III 1 If; MONOPOLE K ti ®(2) PROPOSED GPS 'I ANTENNAS MIN. 12* - 1 I co Tirr SEPERAIION. SEE 0 Z 0 e,-.1• .+ o 0 EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING CO T C) E)GSTIHG iI I Ir�i Y?. 1, JJ-,i I EXISTING■s. .' " 2)'•SHtET U+A-) FENCE i/' �� / iN�' ii/• ' L�J ei,''�},�, 1� 't DSCakPIN� ,/,��7.: / / -. ATTACHMENT 4 cz ,\ OV O �cgR0 co 445 M �� '%;r` _ er-N, MF ik+1 S, G f . N-6).. ..% , _ © S�Q' c4AN. 4 ,,s CRee , 111414114m ,i,_ ' ft, AIN 4\lis. Q _.. , 0'o, . _ 9 ,. ..„,,„ , ,:,, . ,,,, ..,,....„, . „, 44iii4rif ti 0 ,„ , G ST RM3 ! �4/ s/'' © O 9 s. F..py ST. sl, *site ` � Bo ” a/Burnham 0 :Ir.------------ e 4) vz‘ 0 ( EMA/Tigard, Oregon Panel#3 -, 1 inch equals 400 feet ..eg THWEST HILL STREET Qv ATTACHMENT 5 r--, -• ;--�)( �1�►1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, ii NC:. D E A M E M O R A N D U M 2.828 SW Corbcg Avcnaw TO: Mr. John Silenzie D. Garvey Corporation Pkd,oregort 9720' 2701 NW Vaughn Street, Suite 467 Portland, Oregon 97210 Thi; 503,223.6663 FROM: Joe Zimmerman, David Evans and Associates DATE: August 7, 1998 Fax 503.223.2701 SUBJECT: Wetland Investigation at Proposed Nextel'Tower Site Tigard, Oregon PROD,a. NT000048 COPIES: Ron Cook, DEA David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) was requested by D. Garvey Corporation to conduct a field investigation for on-site wetlands on the Bonita/Burnham Nextel Wireless Communication Facility, Tigard, Oregon. METHODS The project site was w .lked and approximate locations of jurisdictional wetland areas, using methods described in the US. Army Corps of Engineers Westland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). General site conditions and observations of vegetation, soil, and hydrologic conditions were located. The wetland delineation manual states that wetlands posses three essential characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology specific to wetlands. The area was investigated for the concurrent presence of each of these parameters. Prior to performing the field reconnaissance, a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory (NWT) map for the subject area(Beaverton, Quadrangle) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service Washington County Soil Survey was conducted to locate possible mapped on-site wetlands and hydric soils. RECONNAISSANCE FINDINGS One wetland area is mapped on-site by the NWI. It is Fanno Creek itself. It is classified as Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, intermittenty flooded/temporary (PFOIW). The Washington County Soil Survey maps indicate two soil types in the study area. The soils are McBee silty clay loam (Mapping unit 30) and Verboort silty clay loam (Mapping unit 42). Verboort is listed as a hydric soil (NRCS, 1989), McBee silt loam may contain inclusions of hydric soils_ 1's I•i,,...Ii.l}' t•1•.!..51,•nl.11. 1 1111".ii,,,,111 ••'1ln Illt• s:\natural\jaz\woon0001\nextel doo ) (fill) DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, Portland, Oregon 97210 August 7, 1998 Page 2 No wetland areas were located within the Nextel Communication Facility or within 50 feet of the building pad. The site is located within a developed commercial area. The area is fenced and the grounds maintained. A bike path is located outside of the fenced building site. There is an ornamental planted area between the bike path and the riparian'corridor of Fanno Creek. There will no encroachment into the 50-foot set back from wetlands in this location. REGULATORY IMPLICATIQNS The Array Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) have regulatory jurisdiction over wetlands in the State of Oregon. Filling all,of part of wetlands, in conjunction with site development, will require a permit from the ACOE. Impacts to this wetland should be avoided before applying for a joint permit. If project impacts are unavoidable, a wetland delineation will be required along with a Federal Section 404 and a State Removal/Fill permit. RECOMMENDATION If any wetland is to impacted by site development activities, DEA recommends a wetland delineation be performed to accurately determine the extent and location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries. The wetland delineation process defines precise wetland boundaries that may be legally described and utilized during the design and site development. NOTE: Findings of DEA's investigation are based on the site information collected at the time of our study; our understanding of the /987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual; and our understanding offederal, state, and local regulations governing wetlands. These regulations, delineation methodologies, and wetlands themselves may change over time. A DEA Natural Resource wetland reconnaissance memorandum is not to be used as a fully documented wetland determination report to the environmental regulatory agencies who exert jurisdiction over wetlands. The method employed for this wetland reconnaissance's are not intended to produce a map showing the exact wetland locations and boundaries. A wetlands reconnaissance provides only generalized and approximate information based on a brief site investigation. Approximate wetland location and extent are subject to change based on a detailed and more thorough site investigation and professional land survey. /�li�'Jhllltllly! .l hll Jnl�•IN.t� bw�tl�. ATTACHMENT 7 November 17, 1997 Burnham Business Storage 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. #300 Portland, OR 97219 Re: Bonita/Burnham Dear Interested Party: Nextel Communications proposes the construction of a wireless communications facility located at 8900 SW Burnham Street (Section 2AD, Township 2S, Range 1W, Parcel #2200). Nextel proposes construction of a 100 foot monopole and associated equipment shelter, which is a permitted use, subject to the Director's approval in the Central Business District Zone. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for necessary permits, on behalf of Nextel Communications, the D. Garvey company would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: December 9, 1997 Richard M. Brown Auditorium 877 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 pm Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 827-0180 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John L. Brosy, AICP Project Manager •--- 11, iui a, iu:4a 'Q ouJ oc ATTACHMENT a AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINur - STATE OF OREGON ) ° ( ---2-7ite# �a�ne o City of Tigard ) -'le I, ,3m OL , being duly sworn, depose and say that on tyo.i Cl , 19 i 1 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) S'O o S C,J . vre.h QYvL Si-reQ,,* S ZpD i TI 2--S t R l`---, t 1)„Jre I 2-Zo0 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1 5-0 S 5 w 6 4\ AYe&ve ( i►. <-L�.-,( i oR `',`7 Lc) with postage prepaid thereon. )7- A Signature (In the pre nce of Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETFJNOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the day ofN1 , 1911 9 1;d�.•, OFFICIAL 'l /L Ai Ui 'I :�. ��,t n l i r,'� KIMBERLY D.'1,..1,..,c1 1' NOTARYPUEUC-O:,;cotd 1 NOTARY P �.U��F OREGON 11110J COMMISSION N0.G59944 / �� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2000 (/ My Commission .• sires: (Applicant. Tease complete information below for proper pia=ment with proposed projec) rNrtME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSE]) NAME: ?zomitA-1 Bv2NHPt`'C.D� 10 ft-Z) - I TYPE OF PROPOSED DE ELOPMENT: 0.crt('}J,)(fi0,, <rf 't too' Mao�lf r dfLnt,i k°d a rMe - . i • '^ 'D ZO-,e1 'Name of_.pp'Ica/IL/Oaner. )4 el}C ( CaMti „n ilf,i-:an !Address or General Lacanoa of Subject°roper-F. R1'00 L1 n 7 pvrh IV(e 1 • _ Sub7ee_Prover.-.,Tax\lapis) and L: l.oc_(—)_S 1 ATD i 7 2 S_ Q,1W—, Pol'_C I— 2200 --_, CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS WITS] _ - . NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND US l r [ WEST C1T[AND U88.SUBCOMM1TTEC MT CIT 8Ot1Tlll CIT CENTRAL CIT c z Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude alg Hopkins ck Blethan 11905 SW 125th Courl 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 430 SW Vams Street 1 25 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 T ard, OR 97224 c (503)524-1066 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 i Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F.Mahon ohn Benneth 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 0 (501)524-6325 (503)524-4550 (503)639-0694 ::.,-..) _L `- c. ul !D c Kathie Kalllo Chrisly Herr Linda Masters Pat Wyden 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 1 1386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Stre Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 . Tigard, OR 97223 o a (503) 524-5200 (503)590-19701(503)624-8009 (503) 620-7662 Ed Howden Barbara Settler Scott Russell Sue Rorman D 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road 11250 SW 82nd Aven r '( Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Scappoose,OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 'I (503)524-6040 (503)884-9303 (503)5.43-2434 D 0 Bonne&Jim Roach June Sultfridge Cal Woolery 0 14447 SW Twakesbury Drive 15949 SW 148th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Court Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 m (503)590-0481 (503)590-0523 (503)590-4297 z Karl Swanson 1 1410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard,OR 87223 (503) 590.33 _ i PLEASE NOTE: in addition to properly owners within 250 feel,notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list, Rvoliwi irwmnlefoninci cl mil . , 1997, 11-12 11:31 #467 P.03/07 i 1 * First American/Washington * Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel : R0468194 Site: 8815 SW OMARA ST TIGARD 97223 �}j� Xferd: Mail : 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 IVV Price : $340, 000 Use : 9152 GOV,CITY Land: $38, 000 Telephone : 503-639-4171 Thomas Bros : 655 F5 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DB 00500 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 414,255B1dg Sf : Ac: 9 . 51 Legal : ACRES 9. 51, NON-ASSESSABLE * 2 * First American/Washington * Owner: BURNHAM BUSINESS;STORAGE LLC / Parcel : R0468112 Site : 9275 SW HILL ST TIGARD 97223 V Xferd: 08/29/95 Mail : 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD #300 PORTLAND OR 97219 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $150, 670 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 655 E5 Imp: $522 , 230 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DB 00200 96-97 Tax: $9, 161 .47 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 63 , 162 Bldg Sf : Ac : 1 .45 Legal : BURNHAM TRACTS, LOT PT 7, ACRES 1 .45 * 3 * First American/Washington * Owner: SCHR.AMM ANN M Parcel : R0468014 Site : 8764 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 6292 PREAKNESS WAY WEST LINN OR 97068 Price : Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $117, 610 Telephone : 503-655-4463 Thomas Bros : 655 F4 Imp: $50, 000 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DA 00300 96-97 Tax: $2 , 281 . 98 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 34, 412 Bldg Sf : Ac: . 79 Legal : ACRES . 79 * 4 * First American/Washington Owner: GENERAL TELEPHONE CO OF Parcel : 80468103 Site : 8840 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : PO BOX 1003 EVERETT WA 98206 Price: Use: 3992 MISC,ASSESSED BY DEPT OF REVENUE Land: Telephone: Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 25102DB 00100 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 283, 140B1dg Sf : Ac: 6 . 50 Legal : ACRES 6 . 50, MH X# M00148449, ASSESSED BY OREGON DEPARTMENT OF * 5 * First American/Washington * Owner: TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Parcel : 82024501 Site: 8777 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : PO BOX 23000 TIGARD OR 97281 Price : $525, 000 Use: 9252 MISC,WATER DISTRICT Land: $540, 090 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02000 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 175, 982B1dg Sf: Ac : 4 . 04 Legal : ACRES 4 . 04, NON-ASSESSABLE * 6 * First American/Washington * Owner: ZUBER JOHN H Parcel : R0462154 Site : 9025 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 J J Xferd: 03/18/91 Mail : 9025 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 97223-/ Price: $84, 000 Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $57, 930 Telephone : 503-639-0395 Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: $41, 400 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01700 96-97 Tax: $1, 352 . 37 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 16, 988 Bldg Sf: Ac: . 39 Legal : ACRES .39 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • A.: 1997, 11-12 11:31 #467 P.04/07 • 7 * First American/Washington * Owner: CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY L P II Parcel : R0462163 Site: 8975 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 11/03/95 Mail : 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $182 , 160 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: $98, 240 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01800 96-97 Tax: $3 , 817 . 62 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 61, 855 Bldg Sf : Ac: 1 .42 Legal : ACRES 1 . 42 * 8 * First American/Washington * Owner: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE;RESCUE Parcel : R0462172 Site: 8940 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 / Xferd: 05/19/92 Mail : 20665 SW BLANTON ST ALOHA OR 97007 V/ Price: $173, 800 Use: 9462 SOC,VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Land: $203 , 910 Telephone : 503-649-8577 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: $78, 760 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01900 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 64,468 Bldg Sf: Ac: 1 .48 Legal : ACRES 1. 48, MH X# M00083718, NON-ASSESSABLE * 9 * First American/Washington * Owner: OVERFLOW CORP Parcel : R0462216 Site : 8950 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 , 7 Xferd: 03/09/93 Mail : 8950 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price: $225, 000 Use: 2012 COM, IMPROvED Land: $123 , 290 Telephone : 503-598-1870 Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: $508, 890 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02400 96-97 Tax: $8, 607 . 06 Bedrm: Bth: YB: 1977 Lot Sqft : 36, 154 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 83 Legal : ACRES . 83 * 10 * First American/Washington * Owner: MILLER RICHARD L Parcel : R0462243 Site : 8970 SW BURNHAM ST ORTLAND 7223 Xferd: Mail : 8970 SW BURNHAM ST PORTLAND R 97223 Price: Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $56, 450 Telephone : 503-639-3225 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp : $132, 100 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02700 96-97 Tax: $2 , 567 . 08 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 17, 424 Bldg Sf : Ac: . 40 Legal : ACRES .40 * 11 * First American/Washington Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel : R0462252 Site : 9020 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use: 9152 GOV, CITY Land: $55 , 550 Telephone : 503-639-4171 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02800 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 14, 810 Bldg Sf : Ac: . 34 Legal : BURNHAM TRACTS, LOT PT 5, ACRES .34, NON-ASSESSABLE * 12 * First American/Washington * Owner: KEEFER MARION W Parcel : R0462261 Site: 12770 SW ASH AVE TIGARD 97223 L,----- Xferd: Mail : 12555 SW HART RD BEAVERTON OR 97008 Price : Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $32, 150 Telephone: 503-644-1567 Thomas Bros : 655 F4 Imp: $20, 380 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02900 96-97 Tax: $715 . 20 Bedrm: 6 Bth: 4 . 00 YB: 1979 Lot Sqft: 10, 018 Bldg Sf : 2 , 656 Ac: .23 Legal : ACRES . 23 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 10: 43 U503 ` , iipt.:...._AlliW ATTACHMENT 10 k� AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE wITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF TFI E SIGN POSTING.RETURN Tffi5 Al -WAVIT T�: :....... ..• •_rt ...- • x. u. ..:^ P1'aaniag •. '. ;. �•,. . '13125 SW Hall Boa.Ievsrdv .... . — .. ..Tigard;-OR 97223 I. Yy Yo 0 G— , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed (-1�4,.s-}r'<4.;)„ of-o. fielecov. .,,k,f,a.0 -lU„•- a1-.t far:lR affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or ax lot(s) currently registered) - B tC l3.r' hart S�. ( S 2 Rb�'T.2 S >?\`^) Parcel a a oa . and ``' ' did on the 11 day of (" ixr- • . i;•, 19 '. I personalty post not indicating that the site may be proposed for a c...a:: , ,�11) , .1`', S ejaY. 'let ,• l x(10(0 application, and the time date and place of a neighborhood .•.:.. : meeting to discuss the proposal ?;,'• The sign was posted at 611019 5 gL1 1 1,G(V/1 TIC- , oO- ct-lZ23 (,; (state location you posted notice on property) k./\_ /- Sign ure (In the res ce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLFTEMOTARIZO Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the � % day of Nth _. 191T1 I r ( ,;•..* - OFFICIAL SEAL I`'' I II n 1 : -0 �, KIMBERLY D.THRUSH v47, ° NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PU=l IC ;I F OREGO V COMMISSION NO.059844 "` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.I,2000 i My Commissio Expires: , (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) — i NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED N• . 1 - ' i r, :. 4, R- 1 ' ` f �TYPE OF PROPOSED DE`•'�LO E,■4T: _ i� •J, ,r ' , I,i' , ,, . • .• A, , %D Z,„ I dame of ApplimnrlOarner- i'n C•1`fif j I Address or General Lx Lion of Subject Proper R1W -S 13L(K ktr". s) i I Subject?ropery Tai Map(3) and Lin�(s): S^. :a► ����1- r 2vv _ __J - --'----------�n-beciW�1''r�s°sGrSF°`tra SELLOM EIDNEflLEhINIOD 1NI0I ►LVDI'IcidV EI}Id I CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ..h.i ,,,,-. ttl rrDr<<,t7:::�tti. NON-RESIDENTIAL r i 1 cATtE ii/ r 3/7 i STAFF. VIA 602 APPLICANT: nPx 111 (-o In w.kK1ca41OaS AGENT: • c`)4vve 6o00°ra /ch ‹,,..i.`f': �ta14o.1 1i ur16Q c• aG'�•-�bey4N 'YO(,Kid Phone:t l 1.93 — S 506 Phone: [ l X2-7- 0"2a3 I 'I PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: .q6o s-w eu.-,4 LtQw fi-ee_4-- 'l TAX MAP/TAX LOT: 'L<15240 52 4O 0.X Lai- 27.00 j it NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: 4 i Cleve-ior KA Oat- &uIe(A) ;!PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: p e,velap 6, !do caot towev` w Is q44 3 !Lf 2L ii w I ail-QUTA.S us o4`- 4..^ £+,Lt4KG_od 5- z-ift'>v Gt1d1, 77 i COMPREHENSIVE f' SyslFeu, i I "I PLAN DESIGNATION: 6eiii 41 U2(AS teigz 4lst'r . 0 ZONING DESIGNATION: Cee�ci fa( 3us,tit ss P t," - - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT East- FACILITATOR: �4 4- was vadrp TEAM AREA PHONE [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: 1/t sq. ft. Average lot width: IN ft. Maximum built ing height:/ ft. Setbacks Front 4/4 ft. Side lila ft. Rear ' ft. Corner a/� ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: % Minimum land ca ed or natural vegetation are : iS % P 9 [Refer to Code Section 18. 6 1 c(kies s '{awet,- t 5 Utoi-4e-�r ' ' co LIB 5.e..Ll2 214 _dawo/' b..2.!'I- ADDMONAL L LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS backia ,,,t4)„,„,,, de- p d Peel-.-- Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a parti on must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The cepth of all lots shall not ex eed 2-- times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1;.: times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-lots) • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of$ MGM4s lfsubiI I DIIIC$UoI/PliIllfi O.grta.it Soctloo Post-it"routing request pad 7664 ROUTING - REQUEST Please )) I '1'READ To /O (Jj I HANDLE f}f I APPROVE anted --- ' i' FORWARD f" RETURN I I KEEP OR DISCARD I I REVIEW WITH ME Data 1 1 / I From La"� • SPECIAL SETBACKS / • Streets: � Q feet from the centerline of 11 ct . Established areas: feet from • Lower intensity zones: P7 l p feet. along the site's l 0/A boundary. • Flag lot: 10-foot side yard setback. [Refer to Code Section and 18.96] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half (%) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. //O! Z cV (fC e/e h ^�� �e [Refer to Code Section 18.98.020] �bc PARKING AND ACCESS / Required parking for this type of use: �'^ �� wtalK'e(44Nl2 5c I.1 6e vplt/ e Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 1/)Ake \ o„ cold,] lo e p✓,10�J4 %IPc °"` -/Qql--j^�IJ pw� W1.rtoLd ` ttlj pQ✓V 5^1A(,14 (2 um I•"`"'F�► Secondary use required parking: "g Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): vt No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking Stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: ▪ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 8 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided. as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi-famil , commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobil traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for ev ry fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Owe Minimum access width: 14 a • Minimum pavement width: �s✓ � waold All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: h/G [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108] ' a CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Pape 211$ kON-Iuir.■Uai.YOUcIuu,nu.uI Impart:N..c sect'.. WALKWAY REQUIREMEI T Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the around floor landing of stairs. ramps, or elevators of all commercial. institutional, and industrial uses. to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development an' eighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercia r industrial building in excess of 10.000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space six and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Sectio 8.106.070-0901 ■ CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. / (Refer to Code Section 18.1021 --- -% BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between `,, adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required: these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities. and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ( 4 a feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. Gc(/a feet along south boundary. ,�� ] feet along west boundary. V______ In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along ��se.�o,�k s� Lek .e) • --- — ScveQU�rcl, �FQ ,, LANDSCAPING wtC3u.N• ,,I.' .eau DIA4 -w► lo.e ✓o/t,) Street trees are requi d for all developments front! en-a_ ubiic or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 t in length. Street trees must be placed either—vittthrtite public right=of-way or on private property within si (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inch , measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending n-. the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting str et trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every s ven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative c py effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the iparking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms. decors i e walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and access (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.108) CM OF nGAR0 Pre-Aoplication Conference Sites Pape 3 of 8 111111-bstlsutia1 appllaOsc Mauls]Iuu.rd.ut Soct1.s SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained pligr to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon uest. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is review art of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for re iew before the Hearings Officer. [Rater to Code SecUon 18.1141 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas_and their boundaries. is the reonsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting, the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the developmentapolication, Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. 4- 4/. o uw �o a,ddvess der /r.Cnu c Owe, /,,y ioi ev filet rQ ui►es o SD 0,d¢ Lc,F+- i44-eaSrz/eW 6,04 . .v fHC • , • [Hefei to Code Section 18.841 D CLd ct acf J'o l th, -44r s o V 91A :,O o;,,;.1 ■ Shaw, ass -Ce ah ii g.$s. `) J STEEP SLOPES When steep slopes`exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval tandards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.84.040.B. The report shall be based upo eld exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirement f 18.84.040.8.2 and 18.84.040.8.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,B a 0 96.44 Purpose: Land development adjacent to sensitive areas shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of e portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: > A gravel walkway or bike path, not exceeding 8 feet in width. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and > Water quality facilities may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. CITY IF 11GARD Pro-loplicatiss Caslx5acs Nees Ns 4 di IU4u!/earial atrlkariaa/Maaa1N a.w..0 Laciin Location of Vegetated Corridor: In any residential development which creates multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership. such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract. and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R s 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3.Design for SWM) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site d velopment review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal here possible. The tree plan shall inc de the following: : Identification of tt e location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the ity; Identification of a p gram to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must fo4w the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: '' Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of frc4rt 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; 1 Retainage of from\50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the tree to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D: Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; : Identification of all trees which ace proposed to be removed; and : A protection program defining stand ds and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: : A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. if a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined,by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged. by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city. either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. CITY OF T1GARO Pre-Application Ceniereace Notes Pape 5 of 8 11011-IssiesIUsl mllc.bsu/PI..iIu/Pennant iUcD.i The planting of a replacement trees II take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tr• e replacement under Subsection D of this section. a party may. with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in pe ing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(Dl SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVAYI Prior to submitting a Subdivi ion land use application with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivisio plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed con rmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 648-8884) NARRATIVE —1 The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. \, Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) I✓_►6 3Z • CODE S E C T I O N S✓t . �,4 �r t 9 /�°-"vi c e S °L)4-1.7- 18.80 _ 18.92 _� .100 (/18.108 x18.120 18.150 18.84 18.96 L� a 2 18.114 8.130 18.160 • 18.88 __ A8.98 x18.106 18.116 _ 18.134 18.162 18.164 IMPACT STUDY----- ------ - -- As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to includeimpact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on . public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system. including bikeways, the drainage system. the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact. the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32.Section.050) When a condition of approval requires transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. • er to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD ME G — The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any and use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted, (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) I CITY OF T16ARD t re-Aooltcation Conference Notes Page 6 of I NON-lasl/aatlal mllcatlea/PIaaalaa Summit Sectlea BUILDING PERMITS Plans for building and other related permits will not be accepted for review until a land use approval has been issued. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. -------------------------- RECYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler fo eview and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Le Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.1161 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: �/ /� �� i( iete:„ — t,vc„ (_ b4jg A I J a co%c.r Q a� *(,t c 4. a P ✓o 0 1 a G01,t1 Y fc 7 U � &rl&a - —._Q7����4 SQ I K C JQa i.o Ltd . Cod l/ Uc aIJ,w a�� cea,v . . „r / . o _ • 14./aS R.e $0teco5 Dvc� t y b ► vlc�j r se Hoe c,k a d rsf2c le-• ,( . Ike . T' '�. u 1Pv-%r I.. • '... •u 41f• •t. . 0 • ! I'e }J' • .. S;4Q._ PIO t1– !.�vt, of-w[S O d W 4 4✓- 1 O L4—GO Ll Qry u+l. , ■• I - PROCEDURE ✓� Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT bQ accepted after 3:00P.M on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8,5 by 11 inches, One (1), 81" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision, Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page]of 8 MOM�till�Iilll Illllcltl../Pla..III Osearasst Sabel • The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P/ait lA.a^.I� 004w4Is4tevv . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Plann11 g Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. An Additional pre-application fee and conference will be required if an application pertaining to thi9 pre-application conference is submitted after a period of more than six (6) months following thi9 conference (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: r CITY OFTIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE 15031639-4171 FAX: 1503)684-7297 E:U/11111atty\alst/rn 1/r1l11t>sl IE1r1bsMq S1CUSI:■itlerl ar/u/t.u11 ?1-Yar-97 CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Application Conference Motes Page t of$ NIII-ls$llsatlhl amillcatls./P i ata1i11spsrusest Sectlsu CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. / Staff: Date: l(///- j�J APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) d� B) Owner's signature/written authorization m� C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies l E) Filing Fee $ 1-Pe 5-14 SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 10 1 . Vicinity map 111 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) ca- 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: 0.= (a) Floodplain areas 0 (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: Pa- - (a) Wildlife habitats t?> (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways m/ LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ,i 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties d�l 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site tn- (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area ❑ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 8. The location areas to be landscaped d- 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 6- 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation ❑ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Dra■ ;s Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies / =- The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ❑ 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: I, ❑ Sign drawings sh be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of e Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to co a sign. G) Traffic Generatiba Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Pa' tition/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1 . The owner o' the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner' authorized agent ❑ 3. The map s :le (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Descriptio of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within a I. adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all perm ent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees witlhin 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the propose street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude effi • nt future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Prelim Plat Ma and Data Indicatin : No. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,1 0 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets J ❑ 4. Names, addresses aid telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer And designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a ity-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater tf, 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlan & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PACE 4 OF 5 e J) Solar Access Calculation . 0 K) Other Information No. of Copies / D w■a1 IQ eviS OR_/)ti-e..2 190 h:Vog in\pattylmasters\I.kI ist.mst May 23.1995 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 --�§"AV ,..h�����. • min ...I;,�a�uc, au�.ii ou'ti.: Will pR D'.'GARVEY Site# -rte r���2tiJHAM R COPORATION Name ^ PROJECT;MANAGERS File P/atv� r%►.o, Date - Ra44,01A. .4 - 11-.12.1121 S . November 10, 1997 AT&T Wireless Services Attn: Administrative Offices 1600 SW Fourth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the City of Tigard's Wireless Communication Facilities requirements (18.152.080), Nextel Communications is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8900 SW Burnham. In general, we plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing Enhanced Specialized Mobile Network (ESMR) service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one mile of the proposed facility that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Jo L. Brosy, AICP 411Ir it5 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 E, Y CORPORATION PROJECT°fv1ANAGERS Nov. 10, 1997 Western PCS Corporation Administrative Officers 1500 NE Irving,Suite 500 Portland,OR 97232 Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the City of Tigard's Wireless Communication Facilities requirements(Code Section 18.152.080),Nextel Communications is hereby notifying you of our intent to hold a pre-application conference with the City of Tigard to discuss locating a new free-standing wireless communication facility to be located at 8900 SW Burnham. We plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing Enhanced Specialized Mobile Network(ESMR)service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one mile of the proposed facility that may be available for possible coolocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, . Uz— ' Jo ' L.Brosy,AICP 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 .0ciffr3lU�T1 O.N PRO:IECT`MtiPJ, E 2S November 10, 1997 Sprint Spectrum Attn: Administrative Offices 7770 SW Mohawk Tualatin, OR 97062 Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the City of Tigard's Wireless Communication Facilities requirements (18.152.080), Nextel Communications is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8900 SW Burnham. In general, we plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing Enhanced Specialized Mobile Network (ESMR) service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one mile of the proposed facility that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, d Jo L. Brosy, •\CP 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 izz=t42.44„,„=„q 1.......MMMMM MOW'?:: m ...,;',=3•'.' (!5,�1s m�m.-1. ®' ,O `TON IlitifteaCANAG ERS November 10, 1997 Airtouch Cellular Communications Attn: Administrative Offices 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the City of Tigard's Wireless Communication Facilities requirements (18.152.080), Nextel Communications is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8900 SW Burnham. In general, we plan to construct a monopole of 100 feet in height for the purpose of providing Enhanced Specialized Mobile Network (ESMR) service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within one mile of the proposed facility that may be available for possible collocation opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Or / / ' Jo L. Brosy, • CP Or 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 11•.11.•—:■■u - MON.ii ..,. .... pr .„ „ ,. N, '° .Je ,.. Fro`ec h'orrras,,,.. ` Site Candidate Information Package .-,�. f• "SV 21tp 14 25 TAR J RA t -.c.., - I NC - W o.. ri c 6tICRES I =I` ST ■a^ __ ,f!'M,E; Y 2tc�.m 1 Y at°R 7500 7300 _k ■ ! at, l� < ' i w, O. O Q... _ �I _�� d - I St 1 '1 ',IF'LEI ` 28 r •,.. 3 .< w�j ! � . p .Im ..m ST w r a u` A- loo rtA , SIT ..> �?� ` , O pCSCa'r SY , ..--' sT ST r f .�. to "'Et"; ' 1 = 1 ∎ SM VEMT h w,a u•t.SW CON , �t� lei ��.� _ :" r� Y f 1154.1111114 < s 1 St \�, MAPIEIEAF ST�� I'-, 3 w' o 1 to. ' �. ', r 1 1?11 = .�r 217 °'A r<rA!' -� ♦.+•'r$rr: � .1': \� S p,U �,�` �, 0.0 le S1 4� .A.... a,A,I1pr.• '.11 �"' A , GK[wNr f '�r. .,. of �``�� A ®I© ,i. Lail 1 >r [. • 4 ``,.4:11. ' - ♦ \ CREEK a k y cum ���a///. +9 sv ti Ehal ®®®��Wy'< ,:.,`� a r ' ' , .....R I���•��,y — >�1["oa' ` " r ��a ` • f3�:�iL""' NN 2', `-—t c r�. t` ' �� �-�,uutDTA a h � i7. � :. N A, ^,.. 59W� fir Egli! se, I 1 •:-0 1. _ i A s SW PFAFFLE ® <AAK[_ d O 40If A „ ( e Kra AT 1 SY (!� _ 12,00 __,;% y, Su 1 z � [[„ MOO \ 0,„.,..,[, y, A. �li��?.._ Or�°'.a� rN.s,u • r` ���� Ilwa p w Ski u a • t. n , .,,G \� L SW BAY 1 I Y d r :,... ..t- 1! 'Q _I CARD i uau ' P ' =A p ' v a`a- a_ y g tl '�'MEAO r ST f �[. d -�i� gi.� ` O,'� Al CI[IIT• L► �' a i-•ni L,aalk. _"SL_D I _ —--r'S-- . --1 =it_ tq ~ ;>4.F�,��� TAB, .��� � �� G ""'9 N�I '' C I N10 Rrtlso.at •, t ��, m \ EURTURST IU 1'. i WWI.a-% c 1_ T i� „g n ^,AQ',4,,I a c• sL •5/y Al r/Egt75D rood I� E PARK 0,St 3 t1 a= 11 .�..+ �l �, r Sr (_ s san w,di u'r' �1 p - r. .µ�: /�� ? '� h t 3 Z riCONUCa g A AucT s ^%�,' y sw .J < 'A. C ` 4P a�i7's •-: , (, -SEE nl F9 6 ,t ri ,`moo '� 1200 r 1 - K F. N y, C. =E %ae� `` .'\ 'WANE : 9 a JB00 a ". '`. i��. 1.L ion.tit p 197 NM Clt <} _ SN uEER1i y r' y^`,• +S h U ; �a •� I `` , ■ , J ' J 1800 . lank Sr 72�=` 'st_ : ' $'.A. _\ ..,N w \ 7 A stir" 7500 I�/ w<' ..ours �\ ■ •.1• Sv rsAR ION $T - - / L ./ � � `• � , -� t 2200 1i - R< �.. - 1. r�. -w �- ra .3• '+ < °�SW FIR �s 1 lti� ° f. 4�, 4-'° A. 4 �� C t�� ?,;�#� 211 ii _4 ,� 4— -, r.r..a. k .[: a ©'�� `ty 2 7 sY �7 t `h "Pp SW OIERRY ,• arc' \it.�, a e I :A_ q®® �°."�.;tt E' 1 EDG'_to 4 ,, lo.n 0't sr ` 1 } _ __ Is, no.wln a Nntrl r & 1E CENTER 4 agil -,'3 sw aal '1L3 Al EUmSE R `'�• c �1�S •• , ;, .,� rlilr Asa ± ' 1_. F CT ir z� �I ® d®",>r 1 r i�71. EONITA i .� 4 sY �'. � I ° /"'®� >a s'°° • _A" , 2000 _ - �oO i •u - Im '- A a, a ''.—� • -:lf� � �'- 11 + ,:Fir � `tom . � to'''. Q t- "'" + �� c sti [10 n P z 3 sit IG a ino. g liN 1'9i Lmet _, I 1.0.tf 1r USW fY — � n,h , .�. A.N.t t. t , • T T A A7 /4b R4'r$ I lSSW WEE Vli .�t - n.c ua e .t.ra �: �A7 w 12 Al 54�&O � .N a•,u0 0.11 �_ 1� Z 91 U �.i/ IMWi Ii///� R . �' �^�".. �I!iI7� . '' A� 4C�s,9'st: ys i �'$ a '"� ,vy 1.1 ,..A,. ., r _ l�si. v me ��E� geyj — 12eee4-Tt 47-f7- Bonita c't°e h Vat (OCc2c--6 --' Burnham O 80104-2 Thomas Guide Name: Port d Metro Area 1997 ed. /(( / Pages: 655 / 7 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package ATTACHMENT 8 f `~ F ,. R i tF ,,=: ,-, aiJ,, • ' t:cjR • A)LOOKING WEST TO THE SITE t. i` At i 1 c •F a! CR -t.. s t k.'"..',"' $ " ' • } B)LOOKING NORTH TO THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR01 04-2 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package t. .• Jrr a, 1. a. a E)LOOKING EAST FROM THE SITE tom•,- ' 1 ,.. _ . 7,l ., , t 1 .;y 3 i +!'+ i X33 i r _, :'',4-;a' •?Y e •‘• • . i y I.'J . Q ti J .;[ter.S� •ly. l... -q. F)LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package . , v— 1111 , - ..,..- , . "if ' -:-.■ . . -.......e.y., . .., . , ., i_i„ I• p . • '.' •' . '11-:.' #- -' •- - - . . '...! „ '''',1%6 117. li• '4 -' : /7 i -'•::',f."''t,, ,7",;1 , '. ' '"11' ' ' '-'' '1.-1/4- i /,.. 1 ' • '''' '.■, 'I' 1" .1-''': '.1. i''''' .,..."0:..:liN`. , G)LOOKING WEST FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 MOM mm mmmmmmm MO' ■▪■■. -q.....- M..I ....M MI ■..■ ■■.. I..■ iii• ■■.1 A.... ■■■I October 30, 1997 mI g e D. GARV EY Mark Roberts CORPORATION City of Tigard PROJECT MANAGERS Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Preapplication Conference for Nextel Communications Site(Bonita/Burnham, OR0104-2). Dear Mr. Roberts: On behalf of Nextel Communications, we are submitting the attached Preapplication Conference Request for the location of a wireless communications facility located in the City of Tigard. The following items are included: A. Owner/Applicant information for the proposed wireless communications facility: OWNER: Burnham Business&Storage 9490 SW Barbur,Suite 200 Portland,OR 97219 (503)245-1131 APPLICANT: Nextel Communications Attn: Manon Burke 10220 SW Greenburg Rd., Suite 601 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)293-5500 CONSULTANT: John Brosy for D.Garvey Corp. 2701 NW Vaughn St.,Suite 467 Portland,OR 97210 (503)827-0180 Fx: 827-4898 SITE LOCATION: 8900 SW Burnham Tigard,OR 97223 Assessor's Map No.: T2S,R1W,Sec.2AD Tax Lot:2200 B. Supporting information for the Pre-Application conference: Attachment 1: Project Description Attachment 2: Letter of Authorization from Owner Attachment 3: Site Plan Attachment 4: Assessor's Map Attachment 5: Zoning Map Attachment 6: USGS Map Attachment 7: Area Map Attachment 8: Site Photographs 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 MOM OM, ■■■. ■■■■ ■t1. INNS Hai iii. . '••••���' ■•••••••••UirUUUU. ...U......•••••••. 11111•111111/ MMMMM•••1 C. Filing fee: $240— Preapplication Conference Fee, a check f o r$240 is attached. D. G A R V E Y CORPORATION PRO We understand that the Preapplication Conference will be scheduled for approximattly SECT MANAGERS two weeks from today and hope that the attached information will allow the staff to prepare comments for the conference. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at(503) 827-0180. Sincerely, dift Air Jo ► Brosy ' oject Manager cc: Scott Greenberg, D. Garvey Corp. Manon Burke, Nextel Communications 2701 NW Vaughn Street • Suite 467 • Portland OR 97210 (503)827-8535 • fax(503)827-4898 ATTACHMENT 1 Project Description Nextel Communications (Nextel) seeks to expand its Pacific Northwest Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) network to include the proposed Bonita/Burnham site. The proposed site is located at 8900 SW Burnham St. in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Commercial Business District (CBD), and has a "Commercial" comprehensive plan designation. The proposed communications facility would be located within a 45 foot by 45 foot area area (2,025 square feet) in the northwest portion of the parcel. It would include construction of a 100 foot high monopole mounted with three (3) fourteen (14') feet high omni-directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 114' to the tips of the antennas. The facility would also include the placement of an 11' x 20' prefabricated concrete equipment shelter. The shelter would be used to house radio transmitters, receivers and other essential equipment. Mounted on the shelter would be two (2) receive-only Global Positioning System (GPS) antennas, which are 2" high x 4" wide x 4" long disks. One of the GPS antennas would be operational; the second antenna would be for backup purposes. One test mobile antenna would be mounted on the cable bridge. The test mobile antenna is low gain and is 4" high x 8" long x 4" wide. It is used for site monitoring and diagnostic purposes only. A six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. The facility would be remotely monitored for fire, smoke, intrusion and AC power failure by Nextel's 24-hour electronic surveillance system. In addition to future collocation by others, Nextel's use of the facility may be expanded in the future to include up to three additional omni-directional "whip" antennas pointing downward. Alternatively, future expansion could include up to nine 1' x 4' directional sector panel antennas, which would replace the three to six "whip" antennas. Future expansion may also include up to two microwave dishes, eight feet (8') in diameter, mounted at the 60% and 80% levels. There is no anticipated change to the dimensions of the equipment shelter. Expansion of the facility is not a certainty, but is dependent upon customer demand and/or technological change. The proposed facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses. Due to its extremely low power, this facility will not be a source of interference with electronic equipment, including radios, televisions and telephone transmissions. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. The site will be unmanned and, therefore, will not require water, waste treatment or management of hazardous waste. Access to the site would be provided from SW Burnham St. Minimal traffic would be generated during the construction phase while the crew is traveling to and from the site. After construction is completed, there would be approximately one visit per month by a Nextel field engineer for routine maintenance. Nextel and ESMR Nextel is the largest domestic operator of ESMR systems in the United States. ESMR is an advanced form of wireless communications which offers a combination of features and services not previously available from cellular telephone or other wireless communications companies. The integrated digital communications system combines a digital cellular phone, group communication, a two-way radio, an alphanumeric pager and voice mail in one handset. Like cellular telephone calls, ESMR calls are handed off from one facility to another as the caller moves through the area. This allows for reuse of a finite number of frequencies at low power levels. Need and Purpose for the Proposed Facility Nextel is continuing to build out its Pacific Northwest ESMR network, in compliance with the requirements of its FCC license. The need for a new site is dictated by market demand, capacity, coverage requirements for a particular geographic area, and the radiofrequency hand-off from one site to another in order to achieve the objective of seamless communications coverage. Once the need for a new ESMR site in a particular geographic area has been established, Nextel's system engineers identify a target area, or"search ring," in which to locate the facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by a propagation study. This study evaluates the expected radio-frequency (RF) signal from the proposed site at a given location and height. The RF signal must be strong enough to provide adequate coverage within the desired coverage area. The selection and design of a specific ESMR site is further refined by considering local topographic and geographic factors, tree canopy, buildings, mountains, water bodies, the ability to mitigate the antenna support structure's visual impact, compatibility of the facility with existing land uses, and the ability to negotiate a mutually beneficial lease with a landlord. Because ESMR signals must travel in an unobstructed path from the facility to the user, the presence of any one or all of these barriers can negatively influence the quality of transmissions and reception. The height and location of each Nextel site is, therefore, based upon the ability of the site to effectively function despite those obstacles. The purpose of the proposed Bonita area facility is to provide in-building portable coverage for downtown Tigard. It is crucial for Nextel to have adequate coverage in the downtown Tigard area in order to serve customers in compliance with its Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license obligations. • Rev. Date 9/10/97 ATTACHMENT 2 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION D. Garvey Corporation 1700 Westlake Avenue North Suitc 420 Seattle, Washington 98109 Attn: Planning Department City of Tigard To Whom It May Concern 1, Bob Zimmermann, a property manager of Burnham Business & Storage L.L.C. an Oregon L.L.C., hereby certify that Burnham Business & Storage L.L.C., is the owner of the real property located at 8880 SW Burnham Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 (more specifically described in the attached exhibit), and I authorize D. Garvey Corporation and/or Nextol West Corp., d.b.a. Nextel Communications to apply for the permits and conduct surveys and testing needed to construct a radio communication site and corresponding equipment on the leased premises of the property. Sincerely, ) `/-z s9 7 Bob Z • an Date Property agcr 09/25/97 THU 07: 2G (TX/RX NO 85251 \V B Li 1:z- 4--1 :,o.. r-1 > -pato � �i of f` - I 1 I' - I D M m 2 -I .) , 1 - 0 ,, J eb te `,' a - - 7K ®� 5r-At.t ,d I I o f��►� \ F � 100'►-to,lffa, `—Fe tom. F1143.<<- ass R 't> tJ o Pm-Tr+ - 1T � rL- ;& kJ BONITA/BURNHAM NEXTEL SITE NUMBER 8900 SW BURNHAM EXPANSION PROJECT TIGARD, OR 97223 "EXHIBIT B " 063-0100-0R0104-2 Site Candidate Information Package ATTACHMENT 4 SE V4 NE V4 SECTION 2 T2S R IN WMI 2S I 2 AP .ce %ASHNGTON COI11Rt MOON .•• L_ JT SCALE i-100' 1[>p • sta..,I VS ■ cs�w 18 '�4 v _ 22. `� / Sw SCOFFINS ST scc..r 1300 ails. ,` MO 1.00 nNfQO. f94 •'• ■ ,- -rV 2O , ;F41 221 C:).Al_ 0�°i .. , '▪ /tsot �i9` S ry"f— /�/ S : I` _ MOR1 N • ![00 e ADD IT .N. • ".. '‘ / re 4 ti . sy =1 P "`` cam'. VACATE■∎ .Pe 1'°0 23 7 142/18 FT _ r f� te. •, act r.. ?V 1..n ..', ; ZS I t•c ,r, _ o L' 0 4 ...../, ..v, / \ 9.1, o e ...."2.. ..- ,' k•-* / • „t -)' r•- ' r• T / '000 s / 0 7/ '(; s fit f. �: au�N oD.OT NUT G..O1..,0.01 va[\'''''\---',., TRACTS ' t. 'a { � / . g - •• • .IL. STREET[, ,, • • act r•• " f' u I Zee ;; ace r.• act rt. ZS N. ..`•1 •,)•ta�tos iao. • TIGARD . / 2S I 2AD Bonita Burnham 080104-2 Assessor's Map Parcel Number: 2200 Section: 2 Al) Township 2 S Range I W ' r + A" •"1Bti',,.y.y,J ••• •, ,rq Cf tt 1 ',� d 7y�¢. (y f \,.,. ft4 '. el�r Oil ?v}•.ph'r.Al'...“ a_ 7 . t,isl,?. ,P�,n,- k 6 � �t hiy r v ..._ a�,Y 1 . $TfW ,< f 1•. tf ! J ' C 'r..f VV ..Tl�\ ,j' 1 •Y e✓3%1 J° {_ l i YF1�e yy}¢y; t1 rrt ' f n• x L 4 ,4iotpY.•rdi::4.lre[.., :& b •� rr * 't4•,r"a'j''l"�,• a ; .�i 4 �T ,4 j;.17,),4`..,'I" ' Li rt h `ia; 1,51141 •W wivk, —ipit', `tv,;,9tfr't ( 0" t' 1`�,.� �r( •&7, Li.i?'V� h� d• ,..7Pr tJ(r("ki'fy�G�..ItY .(1 ^�*�. �a}+s•o 441.14�'. rY�q rfrif,,, y+lf+� � f..,;� {� •' f�,L!✓Sf' 1 '�� � :, 1� �g�%��'p� � ~rf`j1 �p,lfi '�I�G=,1" '.. '� d 4,,ri V.lixiR P1 f{4 a , f1•0 /4V'lt.. ,, AC • 0• to I rk f I. 'I.A 1� r , y! tap* ' s� 713th:• a i1 rC,%1•}�'�.t�.a�illa •+v t '•. ,,,y. 6,"( t'ip{�;+�10'44171.,� . * -0 r 7 V■ L4,44!;) - .);`•({'' ,./�• CuBnp*''1,� i'••Jw rr, �; -r, ``GV I'. %g� ,MYO ••Iyn*.4-i. r.�a ,* NIA'. 1,1 .,, •: tall':.4 )1‘ L0). 1, .. 'nth,tlfai a,1, rJ YY6 •P" ,1'tit 1,;',Ed Pyk l','" n\t'"r C.Ji i` rP�'i '� %WI ■ g��,� hx.NL�,vn RrPj'r✓,:,d�(1 ,,f,{r. ✓•t t a� dl� ��°,^�,m}dJ7'"�is – ''d9 AMP/' tG s /,swP.'r, 'OW n'° y4 -7 ,�3�r Zi rS".11tiL. /,�?� `�, .?} �•� i t�•A b 4�t t.t.. d t,�H' J•d srri'Y' r., •^may, 6'•f' a kl 1 r ,p'^I. ''R11 ,,r tM' 1"�"m",Rkf . A ". i` NV C1•' .,0, 4. til $' •a4'P r 4'• ✓ P'R> }iW, 17Q ? t I/e�IgW� > ' Iid'f.•A. .ni'6�k f ,- 'nt „1 ! Iy } ti� •i. M 1��'}i41,,. �9Lt7",lyf.'n' A a M ' i , ,4 '4+ae , t , - , + 5 4a .4yr6' ,t" a•t r y. b I.AZ 1qp ' t?I '1 i 1i}' '"•""t + +1 : 4�a, hl. 1,7�.r l �i�; '1� 1 '• �+r�, h'd b' `sldl I a4: . J�!t ,. r 1 rN $, t ,'f" , S al ae L •., ' r r , ,i .. I m�s a •i r. j1,ad T r ti aP 1 T I ,rd r r ? . ss ; rnS, 11,4 ,�00,..i.. '�` .4$.. ,;,1•! ,e,,, d xikX�i! ✓...''Itr`' rs1:7.7, . 1 +� (y(; . sv:A t h i I n. f�N,rR ({�}_ � Cei ��5��1 ;dAZS'• �C�. co '/'T•i,., •:` ,�1+"'.,4 4` , Y tiLs(3i�,.Al.".".%.'L' '0ih"`'�)p} �c�•,,f �,1,',gc44•vV'- a V� ,t,rl�L ,tt, M"'d':7A., M' ..I�ir �,{I� ' , fw /i''-�t,.- 44%.! r., �"IL7 fi r q rtt03 r b, t 4443 1 , , G r+U .:d74114.1(110�11 '"' f1 •r a� �•''' '[y fig{' i ''''' Ji t 3 `i C ''iw 't4 'F`$"o ( I:vn. �✓,,�y�q� G f 111+Mir: :'a c0><• c s',� 1 �f pe Y Ff s at $ �^ ,� ,n v.,x+r y�a �r+t m a, � Mk' "� •»Aa r , r +E r. 1 r r T r Q�' 1nr �q�X , 3y�ss at 'ikefd�',l+l ,r� x'14 a o ` 'l/i,.N ZtiK �•� r�.. 1 + .. aft ' !t ,y i1a1 _ 1'u tue t� ��' S i�3Ti' ,}}�'.. � 8_i1'J: 1�'-' {�SZt°'1P"wlsN?�j�,^�,e: 'Wirt ��'�3 t� _c,L Y 'Gaalt r tr.. .lit. xS r..s /(14,z, '��kD yR�"ett; rs i`'ri *`IJ'',44; to d' i1�6ij'��io+: IIJ, '1r C.rM•xLi:S i��1lr'�r�F,1. aj •,' �t1 Pna � h"'�`g Ttit to 753 ',4 t mss; �!,. s ad rr'C.il •' °1 - q� 41 , .'�c,IZIfk ', tk�* ;�r � "''S&�'r , v s'1� 11 ,!d 0' .4 y,S lil $� +1 r f . n4'th"" �do p� y t.yr 4�1� ),,+ r,n•vGer.lifT,VV ' f0 147::t CL C •.i , 'e-`1 C }'t� .4.4 e�ait d� ,• /+ 6T.s 3�1.&� '71'17 4•:931 Y.' 4. ,,+' nom 1 H ,w Q'1 o fir/ 44' ,•s �x 4 !, ?p'! ��fj'Efi+! 'f, � 4P ec rn, t .2..•1p(,C,5 7'1 { a } axfetr�t L4"• ml' 1. ii "'i m ; )1.14.4: 7/ ��+if�o'�' �k, r r;s `.6 *`,G.�.�01. '° �`ti a`1,414.%•_,44,rA E il. QHITi R ityl0l�f f�. Ql• �,y Aaarapy y ,��y, . N ' 1 dy �"� ( • �'�dtTt.i hV ''4'''^ r� t'�1;7 ti•. � I �Hj ., a '1'Ot6�:aA1�/y .v.? n p. 4 :+ r �t ii a T t�g i c y ,� k F a�„� I { � �1.7'" '4R-if ! f / ,: ��• Gr ya l Jf+l +,,did . �!%b* { " �,t r • 'i ''t'1 iT j%Ifs>sGWf+f1 1'8� cn t� `4y� "j ��yyLL Ir as.,,.a,,j,}E +rC '^t.•.. fa. `IL„'b'i 1� y,43P • � •. ,9'r 4Sl'e y '.S� ,4 q;tl ,).- " 4tv, Rv' ,t L.,..1 DD +1��}�y� a rikazat.,,T,14,611'' ' ����r �' r, t14, { ,,,,„, ,, +`V ky k, a. ie ai.L'' tt �+ (y?c FIPiI t l >a,I„. i 1%'lYfix+ + ri lY r.i. L1 al j'1 w� .�.. y x •r r -{ *, ,1... l. ,. :���'3'�.q7 � .,tw&�s� d,��' � t''�. ,�S!�t ''�' � a �,,ggyp� /SR � ,p II •,,. ' t /�4fit+�;'Yht'� -,4,4) PAP aa.ye W U GYi G! ' 93;R}JyJy wsr•�, x. ,,1,fit 3w fi i.yeqs121 it °1� ' ' T`Fyg4 +IY• ��'!E 7 .''�pey Lk41 U' - a ��'dfy Rb`s ��na 2.ap i,„„ 'slalLfr�r ® '�' '4t' + f v. ;V'''*.•.. 01 a, 1.4 , , r p; `� Yz.1,0 11, t s A.4s � 4 1 '.e .;e--�°f i` e Sk^. .a U a ,.'C�✓ o h! .11;J17'. r.•a3/ t�si frf '' 1. n'�, ` . i-•0 ;;' --"Ii $ IC•P'i V 7' 'T,• 761 W� fr;t N j � y ,1.1 eH :>�� �1 NI b ` ,",,•k ' r f`, i 4.a 'his,, /. )1 r'x,E ; ,,., u�, t�'9r rel Site Candidate Information Package ATTACHMENT 6 `.�f - _ r:: ;" ' ' k 4 ;..-�� ,' ' •` 1 _ ati+ ° 9 Ci • f• H--J---- _ I � —r r�� •�ei. 4 � t--- -i�l : _r_ • 5t ` �� r� w 'f u t H�eooL ® ti I .z Ice _ ,K rte\ s- V�`! / /1. -� _ --.4,-i _L-1�- .S^ ,- .� L• \ 1; 8... .p:a .f.._-_,......., . te :': I. ° ir -- � _`• : , � aR •A'JtO,r4 s j. . ...-•';:i• -' - : j:114 : • . ce , 1z.-- --t' _ r: .n • ••• loo- ' (f_- ` ,-:I 1 • `k ~ •Tet ~r' ..1; •1.... :'`� ;.. 2r 00• L_Itaadtet 1 • �' 54e-- rt- ¢..4 - 4• 1 • • •' 1.1 ■ -. . _ 7....? . _ z-rti. .''•. . ��� ` F 38 - -_ 11.1 \.:.:":.."7-1.',..r.•-7i '•W�i.NU 7,-*.--....,..:„.e:�- ��A nJhe��j s�-�:y / : •J.5 •. .,-_,,, '�:rh` r..�n!1 ='1• /.- •,•-Yfr / _•••.:.- �A• :. : -��•♦ .4,- � �.. • r:\ ''' .4•.-. is �?� ,� T.¢n f. �,"� .•p _ X11 IN .. .... .. : . .... .. .,-• .,. .. • .•.,. �'o- ;. y "x) ^i a A 'ate -�i II .n- ( -...... ,..../... •Vii - 7t h0 his. :-'.8il c.Cb4.. --Y U� =,, ,J_• C -• c- �. '• i NM r '1 ••- �. 1.`; ti,•Y. `_�. ='v SQL ••��`__ -• 1 . ..- �' :`1 1 ✓f "�`'' �f _ 1 36 •:-"Cb T."_s.- -• , . .., .1'11-�i --.1 •, �,r �.ppAA .7. V T. 'S.W.. f Ski*l E4. ••Q• I• i. •j 1 �'per :' °' �+ .. q 1 `? rA�.i:••• . •:41 Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Beaverton Quad, WA Cty. Rev. 1984 NM)27 Latitude 4C-2S-04 NAD 27 Longitude 122-06-I1 Ground Elevation. 150• Contour Interval 10 feet Map Scale: I :24.000 , r-. _ r.-.-•.r- ri-rte.- F _ ._ ._ 13-1P.,.-iI [ 4'SpI ' 1 ii..0-iir�Y .`•�_td? .Ja°_ • Site Candidate Information Package r --r - ! m�I" ATTACHMENT 7 �'` t W-1 u • ° 25 '"[ .�IrsYrrlcra S. s r •. souur w• p W E WICKS .. Ea ST . , 11110 ` rc ana• ill /r. Fr•wa [•oo [sm wo .I r Sg 9 G • •.� '(�AJ 4. . :.,...., sr r sY ;4c X n 1 �.a. [ ■ 4 Al ,s F_- 28 a_ !^ y SOWS 27( EI[+oap.. w 'n+ar I l F • �+ •0 r . SAO oSo St < 'I- _[ A f-1.. SI•..a . ��-1- _ 4 1. a 1 ^• �'yl ,R, , yJ st y 4 sr�� r[.• 1 `I•'~', r , a w rvvL[IEAf _ I _a + I 1 -,-4. g!,A .• ,Ai' 1 -), itei 217 x AU 4,1/IRE. W sr 2a" Y a L�a o r+ "4 N.Nip CREE[ dl 8000 rsao !' ir , ..„. E •‘. i . ilkl , 99W v ,: 17_r 1.a sr •- 1 J '.Al PFAFFLE ; �® AAA y.r[.r 4,,,,,7„. ... IJ' � A W 1 rZ: i .\ \C =lfAf Ai 1 W__4,.tR`1F +I'•w,-- 114• ` ' �� "' , .lg SY UYIS fti• ,, c;,_ W 6AT[" ' r ® Y r ai ') 4 .•I� G . RD q ' e a w,.zM 5 Z ' 7000 (v a'! +VIE ,n.�® •e •--. - A, r" I[.10011 Sr f t4 �i 07 W El ll�' l�, '�•• PIr-,-'- 12100 •� ...._,,i,- ..c t r p a�~ `- _I Moo i� -URNS l , ��� m \ y Elm rl •i ,�ir ..r r..ur sr- n sY ..",r .cr•N. i „ ., .1 + ro,, , . `1` 1t�J 7� 4i'/- -,--- Yr sv :1 ,, ,1. +_ G `" S - SY EYE 1 -,.. t1 vybr :SA _ y.- [.YO, sl ,,,..� -,, ri 4.a,; , 4 \ sr A ii0'I I : .. .F. ALMIi _SY Al.. ` ' ' T �i� S[E�r eJ <' ^ ��®: . I�oo u K ,_. Y L - -:/S . / .. L��, ,r tll•[u � w "4My„ �°. •SY 4EERrA Si ' 1 yr ■�'- ` wr[r ,:it" i i r .'« [.s r OS r . �0.?0 ,.',, a. 4;s,. fit.?iu .S T. r �' - g 9r f,+ _ ' ill. -OW I,Jr sr `� • 9; � .g :� s s\ /r ••. .t ® r no. \ I : —;,, RI'. y n. E -111- `c .,a+i�; 1 •� W FIR �r I - `. -' �2�y 4 a'c vrlrrw[1;4E 41' [[ 1 a�'�� C� OP 8 N. 4^ A 'Is- g. 21�\ I'• r L ` I ' • :a-' ,n,-^-® . "r21' cyJ,4 1 . L S I I Al r L.4'R, w 541Auf G r ` ' 't 4 • r '111.111 A . ' S s .. -- - s,• --',r..... r ,w • ,n i w[[ [ �; t RCER[CR' Ili _ q9• - Nue1• an A r•. 1 .i hlit .n DR r;�. t�•, -SW 11111- .ps Ni/ °�0 ■ ��!LE7�a, SLAM ' ..".,.•:11 �un Ul '• "a 1 1r.c[ R `• .4 . .. r �� rl' "r u tr j',F , _ Eaoo 411.• *t.----j r .i1. • -gift E , hM1o� I1 A A' :r Sun. �' i BjtS 1 s .. r r rsu '' d d{ ` ^ w e C TON —- I [r r -� r [-, i' eo 0 •°ro y`I r e�S• iS, //1 w IOODY Ve����`i i ii7L IL g� WO. j: \Y.471 V T Y. „:::gclt .11 , ' 4, ;ISABLF fir, r.-': ,� �y ;�� t , a A .:y'; 1.; _ _ l -EL�� ^ `J•;�+ �I .[4,, Al ` —.—1rAWVW'•, I ! A �?RD jig i S+ 'OURRAM ,[ 511 R" [ cew Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Thomas Guide Name: Portland Metro Area 1997 ed. Pagcs 655 • Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package ATTACHMENT 8 . e • • x S f r ,• rt �R v. • k ( 1 ir • • 11.41, 5*.e7f76101..4 A)LOOKING WEST TO THE SITE tit I 112 }} Y* ! > =t om .F1Ji' • I kt3:•1 j 5- - ;•J!J t;• , '. �� � 3` ! ,-•''t 11.SJILFT53. •�+4avJL. �f, B)LOOKING NORTH TO THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR01 04-2 Nexte!Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package `i .i r .r� t ...y 1 s„ " ',`� pia �r ..4 '-': . Y + _ . -1 -0 i r - . C)LOOKING EAST TO THE SITE 2.‘, . Y '''..'t:.?' V'4- ito, �sc,.x ;• f•. g .•1=i - it kI .f r YF:. T. Y 1 l Y l Y l 1 �N mot �- ,\\\\\\\\' ' _ D)LOOKING NORTH FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package " 4 ."....k. 1......._....... NI I 1 .13 1 Ars. „isr.1 v.. . - " ' a _ . :I, 4, - .. .r 4 w" -. . ..‘. -- .4y,., • , . . . ,... 4 '.. , -. . C)LOOKING EAST TO THE SITE .,. , ; ......- ...- . sr • 1:..'-$1 •.= ..7,..-.,:,....- .,' ' eti-,11-7;s: v ,r. - ,i.,: . --• •, .,,t -.-4,-1-4 • ". gl . ' -A' --"' ,,-c I.•r,,,e•L." C...* :•.• 2... *, --ii7-•••___ , . 1 - D)LOOKING NORTH FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package h .v. -- i 'dr• a E)LOOKING EAST FROM THE SITE izAPP 9' 0 ,q! :t'''' V-,' y ,1 '" r .a, R ,'fit, • l.. r ,. f•l 0 1M^ SM1.. At F)LOOKING SOUTH FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Nextel Project- Photos Site Candidate Information Package 11111111111111H, _ • ' 1 ,-., c- ye ': ti hz r�; } \-..i. '4 !' x `i: G)LOOKING WEST FROM THE SITE Bonita Burnham OR0104-2 Pre-Apps ( D`Meetings) YNovemi er�1�J97 :;.: M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 '•<:: :>3�:E::::>:::>:...... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 :>:>:>:>:>:>:>:>:>:»::>:>:>:>::»:>:>::»»»: :::::»>::>::::: >::>:::.: :;:::;::»>ss:>.<s::>::>:z:»>:: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 7 3 24 2 5 26 2 28 29 8:00 8:30 --- - __ An Norris w/Thompson Vivadoda Architects ;z' 900 22•O 0668 Addition to Tigard Cinemas tee- 4i(--2 9:30 r tto^ •::�ti4iFi:};:}v 10:nn c >: -o :gust sruurt,, i :< V, !3 I 10:30 �/!�� � �,,/f�L den Sandblast 653-9093''«< > :`:```>�::`> > >> rr.�.:: / 11:00 River de Hammes VSfalnut Glen Subctivtslon �7 l � 11.30 »>::. • /S 9 12:00 ( v/T. 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 9:34AM Wednesday, November 05, 1997 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . 1 4l' APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: " "l I' DATE OF PRE-APP.: MEW Property Address/Location(s): FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Site Size: Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': Date: Address: Phone: City: Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Comp Plan/Zo a Designation: Address: Phone: eic, L1(3.3 City: Zip: CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Rev.4/21/97 i:kurpinVnasterslsdra.doc must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY / Application Elements Submitted: ❑ Application Form �� The owners of record of the subject property request Site / Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): El Owners Signature/Written Authorization_ ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed / ❑ Site/Plot Plan —_ynG° (#of copies based on pre-app check list) i, ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") _:" ❑ Applicant's Statement Well0/ (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate t.eQ0 ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) aaei ❑ Filing Fee (Under 5100.000) $ 800.00 (5100,000-5999.999) $1,600.00 (51 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55/510.000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as 'described on the front of this application In the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions thatmav be attaches! to or imposed upon the subject pro0trty. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of . 19 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 CITY OF TIGARD Community,Development Shaping,4,Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER j Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LCUPI97-0005 VARIANCE-WAR) 97-0003 Case Name(s): AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Name of Owner. David & Christine Hammond Name of Applicant: AT & T Wireless Services Address of Applicant: 1600 SW Fourth Avenue City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97201 Address of Property: 12562 SW Main Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. Regaest -> The City of Tigard Hearing's Officer has approved a request to develop a 50-foot-tall cellular communications monopole tower and related equipment structures. A Variance has also been approved to the development standard requiring paved access to the leasehold area to minimize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno Creek. The access drive will be situated within that 25-foot-wide buffer area. a: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district provides for a concentrated, central commercial office, and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential, and mixed uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CBITEBIk Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134. Actin: -> ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Mee: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Rnal Deciisioa: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON FRIDAY JULY 25,1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS REED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR HUNG OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M.ON JULY 25,1997. QaestIont If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 AT&T MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE CF FINAL CROER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application fora conditional use permit and a ) FINAL ORDER variance for a 50-foot tall tower for cellular telephone ) CUP 97-0005 antennas and an accessory structure in the CBD zone at ) VAR 97-0003 12562 SW Main Street in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (AT&T Wireless) I. SUMMARY 1. The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for a 50-foot tall tower that will support flush-mounted antennas for cellular telephone services and a related 12-foot x 28-foot equipment building and associated development. The proposed tower and building will be situated in a roughly 3000-square foot leased area behind (south of) a commercial building on the 0.63-acre parcel. A sight-obscuring fence is proposed to enclose the tower and accessory building. Existing vegetation will be retained outside the fenced area. The applicant will place gravel over the remainder of the fenced area. 2. The applicant proposes to provide vehicular access between the site and SW Main Street through the existing parking lot on the site. The existing parking lot is paved to a point about 90 feet from the proposed tower location; beyond that point, the applicant proposes to improve the access with gravel. Tigard Community Development Code (CDC) 18.108.080 requires access and parking to be paved. The applicant requests a variance to that requirement to minimize development within 25 feet of the top of the bank of Fanno Creek. The access drive will be situated within that 25-foot wide buffer area. 3. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff recommended approval The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer approves the conditional use permit as provided herein. II. BASIC FACTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Sections III and IV of the City of Tigard Staff Report dated June 27, 1997 (the "Staff Report"), and the staff and agency comments in Sections V and VI of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The applicable approval standards are identified in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARINGS AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 7, 1997. The hearings officer closed the public record at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are tiled at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The applicant's representatives, Mike Bimdorf and Jeff Penick, accepted the Staff Report without objections or corrections. Mr. Birndorf noted that the applicant intends to install a sight-obscuring fence around the ground-mounted equipment rather than adding landscaping. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by representative. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page I V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variance based on the findings in Section IV of the Staff Report. No one disputed those findings. The hearings officer concludes the findings in Section IV of the Staff Report accurately reflect the law and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own, with the following additions: 1. The applicant modified the proposal at the hearing in this matter to substitute a sight-obscuring fence for the proposed landscaping shown on the site plan in the application. Although CDC 18.100.110(A) encourages use of landscaping for screening and buffering, a sight-obscuring fence also is permitted for that purpose. In this case a sight-obscuring fence provides adequate screening and buffering provided it surrounds the ground-mounted equipment on all sides (except where the facility abuts a building). a. It was not clear from the testimony that the applicant intends to fence the west side of the facility site. The hearings officer finds the west side of the site should be improved with a sight-obscuring fence or landscaping to buffer and screen the site from view from the residential area further west and southwest of the site. Although the residential uses do not abut the site, they are only one lot removed. Also the residential units are at a higher elevation than the site and will look down on the site. These facts about the location and topography of the site and land in the vicinity warrant buffering and screening on the west side of the site under CDC 18.120.180(A)(4). 2. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with CDC 18.120.180 (Site Development Review). Based on CDC 18.120.180(A)(4), the hearings officer finds that the tower should not incorporate any advertising or signage and should not be lighted except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency or as approved by the planning director for security or safety purposes. 3. Pursuant to CDC 18.130.040, a conditional use must comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. The hearings officer finds the land use policies promote efficient use of land resources and minimization of adverse land use impacts from development. The hearings officer further finds that it makes more efficient use of land and reduces potential adverse impacts of a telecommunications facility to have multiple users share a tower rather than to build new towers. Therefore the hearings officer concludes the applicant should be required to allow antennas for other telecommunications service providers to be situated on the proposed tower and to allow associated transmission equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or building can accommodate such additional antennas and equipment or can be modified to do so; provided, the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further, such modification to the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall respond promptly and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site. 4. The hearings officer finds a communications tower such as proposed in this case has inherently adverse visual impacts. Those impacts are unavoidable for a working communications facility. But, if the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated, the adverse visual impacts of the facility can be eliminated by removing the tower. Therefore the hearings officer finds the applicant should be required to remove the tower within a reasonable time after the facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The hearings officer finds the facility is abandoned, among other reasons, if all antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six months. The tower shall be removed within 90 days of abandonment. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 2 VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, subject to applicable laws and conditions of approval warranted to address the potential impacts of the conditional use. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 97-0005 and VAR 97-0003,subject to the following conditions: a. Before the city issues a building permit for the proposed tower, the applicant shall submit a site plan to the planning director for review and approval. (1) The site plan shall identify where one (1)off-street parking space will be provided for the communications facility. (2) The site plan shall show where and what fencing,landscaping or other permitted method of screening will buffer the ground-mounted equipment and parking area on the communications facility site. Screening shall be provided on the east, south and west sides of the communications facility site(i.e., on all sides except abutting the commercial building north of the communications facility site). The applicant shall maintain the approved screening in perpetuity as long as the applicant uses the site for a communications facility. (3) If lighting is proposed for security or safety purposes, the site plan shall show all such lighting, subject to condition of approval b. b. The tower shall not incorporate any advertising,signage, or lighting except as required by the Federal Communications Commission or other applicable agency with jurisdiction; provided, the planning director may approve lighting deemed necessary for security and safety purposes;provided further,permitted lighting shall be designed, situated and/or operated to minimize its off-site impacts. c. The applicant shall allow antennas for other telecommunications service providers to be situated on the proposed tower and shall allow associated transmission equipment to be situated in the proposed accessory building on the site if the tower and/or building can accommodate such additional antennas and equipment or can be modified to do so; provided,the applicant may require such shared user to pay all costs associated with such shared use as a condition of such shared use; provided further,such modification to the conditional use should be subject to applicable review by the city. The applicant shall respond promptly and in good faith to any inquiry regarding shared use of the tower site. d. The applicant shall remove the tower within 90 days after the communications facility is abandoned or its use is otherwise terminated. The facility is presumed to be abandoned if all of the antennas are removed from the tower or are not operated for at least six consecutive months. DA • • 8th d• ±.40 . .- VI • i �t// ,. .;iad .4. arry EP s AICP - City of P • gs Officer Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-4003 (AT&T Main Street) Page 3 Agenda Item: ;.2 Hearing Date: July 7. 1997 Time:. 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER - LI CITY �.`O m of nG ARD FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Common' Devetopmetl Shaping Better Community SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME AT & T MONOPOLE TOWER Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 97-0005 Variance (VAR) 97-0003 PROPOSAL: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 50-foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. 2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to eliminate the requirement for a paved surface to the proposed communications facility. APPLICANT: AT & T Wireless Services OWNER: David & Christine Hammond 1600 SW Fourth Avenue 3015 SW 116th Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Beaverton, OR 97005 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. LOCATION: 12562 SW Main Street; WCTM 2S102AC, Tax Lot 01101. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130 and 18.134. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Variance will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 97-00C5/VAR 97-0003-AT 3 T MONOPOLE PAGE 1 OF 11 ',ONDITIONS OF APPROVA' PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDINt.� eERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) 1. The applicant shall modify the proposed site and/or landscape plan to provide one (1) paved, off-street parking space for the service vehicle. 2. The applicant shall provide fencing, landscaping, or other permitted method of screening of the ground mounted equipment. The screening shall be provided to the west, south, and east of the leasehold area. The applicant shall maintain the screening materials that are provided in perpetuity. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History; The property is developed with a general retail building that is occupied by a paint store use. The City has no record of any other more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north of the leasehold area is the existing paint store retail building. To the south is a portion of the Main Street Apartments and vacant areas that are part of the Fanno Creek flcodplain area. To the west of this parcel is the main portion of the Main Street Apartment property. To the east is the A-Boy property. Site Information and Proposal Description: The northerly portion of the site is presently de'.eloped with a retail building. A paved driveway area to the east of the building. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Pen-nit approval to develop a 50-foot tall cellular communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the requirement for paved access to the proposed communications facility has also been requested. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-00C VAR 97-0003-AT 3 T MCNCPCLE PAGE 2 CF 11 SECTION IV: AP. CABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A_ J FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement Section 18.120.180(A)(8) requires right-of-way dedication for properties that are contiguous with the 100-year floodplain. Because the dedication of public right-of-way does not appear to be roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed unmanned utility facility this dedication requirement has not been recommended. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 50 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.66 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the Central Business Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the Central Business Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Landscaping a minimum of 15% of the site would require a total of 4,125 square feet landscaping on this 27,500 square foot site. The site does not appear to have any existing formally developed landscaping. However, wetlands or other natural areas have previously been permitted to be considered part of the required landscape percentage when they are part of the subject property. Approximately 17,270 square feet of the site is within the Fanno Creek floodplain area and wetlands, or within the 25-foot buffer area. The applicant has provided a proposed landscape plan for the overall site but not specifically for the leasehold area. The plan provides new landscaping for a total of approximately 485 square feet of previously unimproved portions of the site. Within the narrative, the applicant states that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area will be provided with landscaping to comply with the requirement. The site and landscape plan and the applicants' narrative do not make it clear if the new landscaping that is shown to be provided is to upgrade the overall site or as screening for the ground mounted equipment. Because the site has no formally developed landscaping, it is suggested that the proposed landscaping be provided except where these areas are within the required 25-foot wetlands buffer. In these areas, re-establishment of native riparian corridor plantings is suggested. It is recommended that the Hearing's Officer find that because an area of approximately 17,270 square feet of the site is within Fanno Creek or the 25-foot wetlands buffer, that the proposed additional impervious surfaces do not cause the site to exceed the maximum landscape percentage for the site. For this reason, landscaping a portion of the new leasehold area does not appear to be required. Screening of the ground mounted equipment in this area through the use of fencing or landscaping has been recommended as a Condition of Approval. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0O05NAF 97-3003-AT&T,MCNCPCL5 PAGE 3 CF 11 Setback: Section 18.66. states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No sidE id rear yard setbacks are requir except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district The site does not adjoin a zoning district that is specifically designated for residential use. The Central Business Zoning District does permit residential use as one (1) of the allowed use types. For this reason, it appears reasonable to apply this standard to adjoining properties that are developed for residential use. The subject property does not directly adjoin properties that are developed with residential uses. For this reason the proposed monopole complies with this standard. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non-residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height The existing retail building was not developed with street trees. It is recommended that this section not be found to be applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the development of a new cellular communications use. Therefore, this determination is consistent with the Non-Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Recently it has been determined that because monopole facilities require a maintenance vehicle to access the site periodically, that a minimum of one (1) off-street parking space needs to be provided or proof that existing off-street parking exceeds minimum standards. Based on the plan and existing site constraints, it appears that the existing retail use is deficient in off-street parking and that the only areas available for this purpose are near the proposed leasehoi-' area. Because these areas are primarily behind the existing building, the parking space will be screened. In the event that the applicant is to construct a new space for this purpose elsewhere that is visible from SW Main Street, the parking lot screening provisions would then apply. Because one (1) new parking space would be required, other parking lot landscape provisions are not applicable to this request. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-00 5NAR 97.0003-AT 3 T MONOPOLE PAGE 4 CF 11 Visual Clearanc em Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant states that periodically a maintenance vehicle will need to access the facility. The applicant has not provided parking to serve this development Because the applicant states that a maintenance vehicle will be at the site, one (1) parking space has previously been required for this type of use. For reason, the site and/or landscape plan shall be revised to provide one (1) additional this parking space. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use requires a single monthly maintenance inspection, therefore, two-way access is not needed for the portion of the property that would provide access to this facility. For this reason, no specific is required for this use. The applicant has also requested a variance to paving a any access s to this facility due to current wetlands buffer standards. The applicant states that the Fire District reviewed this application and states that paved access is only required within 150 feet of the proposed facility. A paved driveway area onto the site currently exists. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, the required fire vehicle access to the facility (as noted in the Agency Comment portion of this report) will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, and 18.134. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2- 18) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180(A)(2) (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.(A)(3) (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.(A)(5) (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.(A)(6) (Private Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(7) (Shared Outdoor Recreation A Areas: Rest Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.(A)(9) ( )(') ( (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.(A)(12) (Public Transit), 18.120.180.(A)(17) (Signs) and are, therefore, fc nd to be inapplicable as approval STAFF REP CRT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-00051VAR 97-0003-AT&T,MONOPOLE PAGE 5 CF 11 standards. Section 18. J.180.(A)(18) requires that other c.rplicable provisions of the underlying zone be addres '. These sections are addressed a vhere within this report. THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS ARE FOUND TO BE APPLICABLE FROM SECTION 18.120.180(A)(2 -18): (4), (8), (10), (11), (13), (14), (15) and (16), and are addressed immediately below. Buffering._ Screening and Compatibility Between Adi4.ining Uses: Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant's proposal did not indicate specific screening materials that would be utilized around the proposed fenced leasehold area. It is recommended that the applicant provide a screening plan that utilizes one cf the approved types of screening materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 50-foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention due to its proposed neutral gray color and unobtrusive antennae panels that would be in line with the monopole itself. Section 18.120.180.(A)(4) also states that-on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Open Space Dedication: Section 18.120.180.(A)(8) states that where development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions within at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted bicycle/pedestrian pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Because the proposed development is for an unmanned utility use, dedication of adjoining 100-year floodplain areas is not roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.180.(A)(10) requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development, as proposed. Access: Section 18.120.180.(A)(11) requires compliance with the access standards set forth in Section 18.108. The applicable site access provisions are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Parking: Section 18.120.180.(A)(13) requires compliance with the Off-Street Parking Standards set forth in Section 18.106. The applicable Off-Street Parking standards of Section 18.106 are reviewed elsewhere within this report. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.(A)(14) requires compliance with the Landscape provisions of Section 18.100. The applicable Landscape standards are reviewed elsewhere within this report. STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT&T 44ONCPCLE PAGE 5 CF 11 Drainage: Section _0.180.(A)(15) requires complia,._e with the surface water runoff standard of the 1981 Master Plan. Based on the limited increased runoff that is expected, no specific new drainage structures have been recommended by the Engineering Department. Provisions for the Handicapped: Section 18.120.180.(A)(16) requires compliance with the handicapped accessibility standards of ORS Chapter 487. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the City will review the proposal for compliance with all applicable handicapped accessibility standards. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if • applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central Business District The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing development around the leasehold area will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development. as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site, as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, _ leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property fcr future redevelopment. The STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-0033-AT&T MCNCPCIE PAGE 7 CF 11 specific development crite of the Comprehensive Plan that ac...resses the development of this type of utility facility a, ontained within the adopted Corn, city Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material variance does not appear to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed variance is also, not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the narrow width available around the side yard of this property, it does not appear possible to locate the leasehold area at the end of the existing paved area and still provide access to the rear portion of the subject parcel. Locating the monopole and the related equipment would also be an encroachment into the wetlands buffer. Because access to this facility would usually only be needed once or twice a month, a paved surface to the leasehold area would rarely be used. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is necessary due to the Unified Sewerage Agency standards that limit development within 25 feet of a wetlands. The Variance would not allow a use that is not permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The Variance allows limited economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion cf an existing commercially developed property. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing a new paved driveway within an environmentally sensitive area, to an unmanned utility use that requires only periodic access. The nature cf the variance is limited such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. By its nature, the proposed variance will allow additional limited use of the site, while complying with current standards for screening and buffering from a wetlands corridor. Due to the location of existing paved areas, it appears possible to comply with Fire and Life Safety standards while not constructing the required paved access. STAFF RE•.PCRT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005NAR 97-0003-AT&T MCNOPOLE PAGE 3 CF 11 The hardship is not se posed and the variance reque! is the minimum variance that would alleviate elf. .ardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for access of :his proposed facility dictate the limited need for construction of a driveway. The current wetlands buffer standards were adopted in 1991, years after the existing retail building was developed. Because limited maintenance vehicle access is all that is required to this type of facility. the variance provides relief from a development standard of limited importance given the type of proposed use. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Division has reviewed this request and provided the followin comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six (6) feet in height_ No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION Vl: AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue has reviewed this request and has provided the following comments: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1). When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access many be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1). Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15 feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.1). Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12.500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2). STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0OOSNAR 97-0003-AT&T MONCPCLE PAGE 9 CF 11 Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3). Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4). Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 5%) except for crowning for water run-off. Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4). Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE • LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(I)(2) & (3)). Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2). The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec 903.4.2.4). The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). STAFF REPORT TO T1-1E t-!EARINGS OFFICER CUP 97-0005VAR 97-0001-AT&T MCNCPOLE PAGE.10 OF 11 Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704). No other comments or objections have been received. /L,.. ____ ✓ June 27. 1997 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner • ,J • June 27. 1997 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager c curptrVmarkr/cup97-O5.rep STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 97-0005/VAR 97-0003-AT&T MONOPOLE PAGE 11 OF 11 '40:14.-W. 1 P --.-g I L i 1 I rii -- .f44 4 t‘ti ■ i .f, - 44 P. ..4. Aai #447p g2 4 , _g ..,.. .:;, . - , : -. a3 .: .4‘ 4 * 11, ,s4 fr.t. % 4.\--ts ‘ k••• _ , , ; . ,_ ot,w 0) .,_ _. .= ■ #s ,P 1 . i .r - > ,____ **N N #- s ' ' ->/40 . ,...co a , °.\ A* -0--- ■ ■ c I 3 *—A, w 4 ■1 4 r 0 PCP. , . et s,‘fr ' .°.. . Ik4tV O ,4 . .40 r ,‘ *4 .4 gi1 •• •*• *A„. 4 .44: , :cinilYMap CUP 97.0005 'de: Map is r ' to � 'e A AT & T Monopole Tower i % 1i� w ' \ O a / 25' SETBACK 1 O \ X / Z . 1 / m \1 \ • O r-s•x rr-9•PREFARKATED E4IFT'8rr s�Tez 2. So r rAS. Z 4c •\ s CU/ +. 0 \ Q 3. C,RAvEL YARD . Z 4. LEASED AREA PmP°Rrr L24E.(Ti 3E IDET.) US. f \ I � 5. FANNO CREEK.b. TCP CF MAW. 0.i�CO SF. I �� Z 5'-e.SCUARE Call PAD. NANDRAa. NOT Ef�L 0 PER U13C,SECTICH 33 6.(a)EXCEaTICN. L 5. 5flC F3CF. I \ I0. GRAVE PARCN's Ali WMt (Z1 5P 5. CZ )c, • g\\ L LAND5C.sPE AFF...A.em 5F. kill f \ \ .�. \ V `•- L4•O'�.�GY'E AREA.225 5F_ may:: \ \ F• fa \\ IL. ., . .� CD 0 PLOT P i A N ) cAs` o. _ _ A.T. & T Monopole E .� Li I B I 1 MAP P 3 Main Street Site CUP 97- 0005 VAR 97- 0003 11/12/97 10:45 $503 6P - 7297 CITY OF TIGARD IJ001 **************************$: xx* ACTIVITY REPORT a** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 6189 CONNECTION TEL 8274898 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/12 10:34 USAGE TIME 11'00 PAGES 17 RESULT OK ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 11i 1U/ i 1u:40 j003 b 4 7La7 0,111 W. 11('MW C' IQ,luutiluu7 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • STATE OF OREGON ) )ss_ City of Tigard ) 1, rat being duly sworn, depose and say that on No.-) 19 a l I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) actoo S ZED T ZS -c 1`� Jute l ZZoo a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1 50 5- 5 W 64k Ave.u� PAAW l q,`( Z� with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the pres nce of Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of `i i& 1QCV-. , 1911 OFFICIAL KIMBERLY D.'i�: 'J� I OOOVVO J 1 r NOTARY COMMISSION NOTARY P t:Ll •F OREGON COMMISSION NO.059844 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.t,2000 ,-� ?) My Commission .• sires: _ (Applicant. Please complete information below-for proper placoment with proposed projec) 7 YAM1E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA. : i(3.QQNvIpn( ol- to TYPE OF PROPOSED DENTELOP?41ENT: .)f loo' Ma•ople artJ aiavakl'd Qp.',94 t+ s71x1✓e n CBD Zo•xel Name of Applic .n /Owner. l.(et+i COMM MLan■(c1f.`on i l Add_ ss or General L c o of Subject°roper-f uqa) 5 W TZu(vl 1'1,46'1 ✓f ubjee_? e 'Tat Map(s) and LoE T(9): S 1 AD Z 2 S Z1� Pal' 1 ZZoo I h:UaantoaRyyrtzszer5%.VIr tail.rt_ CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CITSI NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LARD US WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE AST CIT I 8OUTlf CIT CENTRAL UT J c Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude alg Hopkins ck Biethan 1 1905 SW 1251h Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 430 SW Varns Slreel 1 25 SW 1091h Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 T aid, OR 97224 (503)524-1063 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 L Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F.Mahon ohn Bennelh 11035 SW I351h Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Cor'r1 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Q, U (503)524-6325 (503) 524-4550 (503)639-0894 c c Kathie Kallio Chrisly Herr Linda Maslers Pal Wyden A. 12940 SW Glacier Li y Drive 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Stre Tigard, OR 91223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 r• (503) 524-5200 (503) 590-19701(503)624-6009 (503) 620-7662 Ed Howden Barbara Settler Scott Russell Sue Rorman 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road 11250 SW 82nd Aven Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Scappoose,OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)524-6040 (503)684-9303 (593)5.43-2434 Bonne&Jim Roach June Sultfridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbory Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court „ Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-0461 (503)590-0523 (593)590-4297 C Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop t Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 590316 _ - 1 PLEASE NOTE: to addition to properly owners within 250 feel, notice of meelings on land use proposals shall be sent lo all the names on this list. --e rtwo ociwrroc,rrlimilr mtt II.ML f/ t C C C. C C FROM 1997,11-12 11:31 #457 P.03/07 * 1 * First American/Washington ... * Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel: R0468194 Site: 8815 SW OMARA ST TIGARD 97223 '{T Xferd: Mail : 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 k Price : $340, 000 Use : 9152 GOV,CITY Land: $38, 000 Telephone : 503-639-4171 Thomas Bros : 655 F5 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DB 00500 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 414,255B1dg Sf : Ac : 9 . 51 Legal : ACRES 9. 51, NON-ASSESSABLE * 2 * First American/Washington * Owner: BURNHAM BUSINESS;STORAGE LLC . / Parcel : R0468112 Site : 9275 SW HILL ST TIGARD 97223 V Xferd: 08/29/95 Mail : 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD #300 PORTLAND OR 97219 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $150, 670 Telephone: Thomas Bros : 655 E5 Imp: $522 , 230 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DB 00200 96-97 Tax- $9, 161 . 47 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 63 , 162 Bldg Sf : Ac: 1 . 45 Legal : BURNHAM TRACTS, LOT PT 7, ACRES 1 .45 * 3 * First American/Washington * Owner: SCHRAMM ANN M Parcel : R0468014 Site: 8764 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 6292 PREAKNESS WAY WEST LINN OR 97068 Price : Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $117, 610 Telephone: 503-655-4463 Thomas Bros : 655 F4 Imp: $50 , 000 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DA 00300 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 34,412 Bldg Sf: Ac :$2 , 281 . 98 . 79 Legal : ACRES . 79 * 4 * First American/Washington Owner: GENERAL TELEPHONE CO OF --- Parcel : R0468103 Site : 8840 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 v Xferd: Mail : PO BOX 1003 EVERETT WA 98206 Price : Use : 3992 MISC,ASSESSED BY DEPT OF REVENUE Land: Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102DB 00100 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 283 , 140B1dg Sf : Ac: 6 . 50 Legal : ACRES 6 . 50, MH X# M00148449, ASSESSED BY OREGON DEPARTMENT OF * 5 * First American/Washington * Owner: TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Parcel : R2024501 Site: 8777 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : PO BOX 23000 TIGARD OR 97281 Price : $525, 000 Use: 9252 MISC,WATER DISTRICT Land: $540, 090 Telephone : Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02000 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 175, 982B1dg Sf: Ac : 4 . 04 Legal : ACRES 4 . 04 , NON-ASSESSABLE * 6 * First American/Washington * Owner: ZUBER JOHN H Parcel : R0462154 Site : 9025 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 1 J Xferd: 03/18/91 Mail : 9025 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 972231/ Price : $84, 000 Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $57, 930 Telephone : 503-639-0395 Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: $41, 400 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01700 96-97 Tax: $1, 352 . 37 Bedrm: Bth: YB : Lot Sqft : 16, 988 Bldg Sf: Ac : . 39 Legal : ACRES . 39 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. FROM 1997,11-12 11 31 #467 P.OS/07 * 13 * First American/Washington _ * Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel: R0462270 Site: 12800 SW ASH AVE TIGARD 97223 Xferd: Mail : 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 / Price: Use: 9152 GOV, CITY Land: $290, 950 Telephone : 503-639-4171 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 03000 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 137,214B1dg Sf: Ac: 3 . 15 Legal : ACRES 3 . 15, NON-ASSESSABLE The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. FROM 1997,11-12 11:31 #467 P.04/07 * 7 * First American/Washington Owner: CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY L P II Parcel : R0462163 Site: 8975 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 / Xferd: 11/03/95 Mail : 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 97223 V Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $182 , 160 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 655 E4 Imp: $98, 240 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01800 96-97 Tax: $3 , 817 . 62 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 61, 855 Bldg Sf : Ac : 1 .42 Legal : ACRES 1 . 42 * 8 * First American/Washington * Owner: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE;RESCUE Parcel : R0462172 Site : 8940 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd• 05/19/92 Mail : 20665 SW BLANTON ST ALOHA OR 97007 Price : $173 , 800 Use : 9462 SOC,VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Land: $203 , 910 Telephone : 503-649-8577 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: $78, 760 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 01900 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 64,468 Bldg Sf: Ac: 1 .48 Legal : ACRES 1.48, MH X# M00083718, NON-ASSESSABLE * 9 * First American/Washington * Owner: OVERFLOW CORP Parcel : R0462216 Site : 8950 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd: 03/09/93 Mail : 8950 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD OR 97223 Price : $225, 000 Use : 2012 COM, IMPROvED Land: $123 , 290 Telephone : 503-598-1870 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp : $508, 890 Map and Tax Lot: 2S102AD 02400 96-97 Tax: $8, 607 . 06 Bedrm: Bth: YB: 1977 Lot Sqft : 36, 154 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 83 Legal : ACRES . 83 * 10 * First American/Washington x Owner: MILLER RICHARD L Parcel : R0462243 Site : 8970 SW BURNHAM ST ORTLAND 7223 Xferd: Mail : 8970 SW BURNHAM ST PORTLAND R 97223 Price: Use : 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $56,450 Telephone : 503-639-3225 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: $132 , 100 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02700 96-97 Tax- $2 , 567 . 08 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 17, 424 Bldg Sf : Ac : . 40 Legal : ACRES .40 * 11 * First American/Washington * Owner: TIGARD CITY OF Parcel : R0462252 Site: 9020 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD 97223 Xferd : Mail : 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 Price : Use: 9152 GOV, CITY Land: $55, 550 Telephone : 503-639-4171 Thomas Bros : 655 E4 Imp: Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02800 96-97 Tax: Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft : 14, 810 Bldg Sf: Ac: . 34 Legal : BURNHAM TRACTS, LOT PT 5, ACRES . 34, NON-ASSESSABLE * 12 * First American/Washington * Owner: KEEFER MARION W Parcel : R0462261 Site: 12770 SW ASH AVE TIGARD 97223 L� Xferd: Mail : 12555 SW HART RD BEAVERTON OR 97008 Price : Use: 2012 COM, IMPROVED Land: $32 , 150 Telephone : 503-644-1567 Thomas Bros : 655 F4 Imp: $20, 380 Map and Tax Lot : 2S102AD 02900 96-97 Tax: $715 .20 Bedrm: 6 Bth: 4 . 00 YB: 1979 Lot Sqft : 10, 018 Bldg Sf : 2 , 656 Ac : .23 Legal : ACRES .23 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 11/10/97 10:43 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 41003'0u7 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF TEE SIGN POSTING.RETURN THIS AYrv)AV1T TO: :r:R N; ;; - -City of Tigard,.::,: _ .. : ..• - ;�• �:' ''�PlaaaiugDivision`.�- • •• -• . .: 13125 SW Hall Boidevard; y�;:... .-::.- , Tigard,OR 97223 I, Y1`!s,N YOJQCr , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 3^s-}JJc 4-4� 4-0. teiec,�,m r.;cy-+;.ti -}�wPs i'.-1 - .c:lj-l• affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or 4ax lot(s) currently registered) . 86t00 ��tin 110" S�, ( 2 R>J�7a S ) �.\`^, 1 Porte l a 2 co 1 , and did on the li day of Ytic,je fcpr , 19 1I personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a LezAilE 'L'', 44.,lb US <,,1�-�pc-; -lb Ili+eA,` 11(6...k. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal_ p The sign was posted at ct OO 5 � 17 U f rl k TM -r&- D, o l- c 122.3 (state location you posted notice on property) ix./\_ 1/- Signat- ure (In the res ce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLE TJNOTARIZD Subscribed and swam/affirmed before me on the k1 day of TVA . 191Tl , . ._��._-_-��-��j ,� , f•.�,, OFFICIAL SEAL el '� KIMBERLY D.THRUSH r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGOP; r NOTARY PU lC �I F OREGO `i Ciiri, ��� COMMISSION NO.059844 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.1,2000 My Commissio Expires: (-2, ,..0 i -p-t (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) r E OF PROJECT'OR PROPOSED N : 170A liP- 6 -- - II TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT;G.kickc-1-;0,. 1 a 100' Dole and ec.ux.104,1 lop[.(-( �fiut a,C %�C%D Z,-4 Name of Applica nt/Ow-ner Ne,1111 (o,i ,.'cgfi,',), s Z I Address or General Location of Subject Property-. eta) -Stk., Pigr't item" S7 I I `Subject?roperty Tam Map(s) and LOC.;(s): . : 1 Y:', 200 n-bq�o,¢y�as�tar�nra CITY O ' TIGARD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ,W�*�«�J� 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,OR 97223(503)539-4171 IMPORTANT PERMIT NOTICE 4E: Plan Check # y� ��� u ' �� ' ----'--- JODI JONES D BARVEY CORP 10101 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 207 PORTLAND OR 97219 Parcel • 2S102AD-02200 Site Address: 08900 SW BURNHAM ST Subdivision. : BURNHAM TRACTS Block ^ Lot : 006 Jurisdiction : TIG Zoning • CBD Remarks : Site work for monopole This letter is to confirm receipt of your Site Work or Building permit appli- cation which has been forwarded to the plans examiner today for review. As a reminder, the associate land use case (s) is/are: /��-_06(0 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case (s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person (s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans ARE NOT routed to the planning or engineering departmmntl, You must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your site work or building permit will NOT be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If ymu, ha*e any questions regarding this notice, please contact me directly at, 639-4171 for further clarification. Sincerely, M ett �� "evelopment Services Technician c: Building Department Planning Department Engineering Department