Loading...
SDR1998-00018 SDR98 - 00018 ALBERTSON ' S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION V NOTICE OF DECISION A, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 98-0018 fait CITY OF TIGARD ALBERTSON'S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION shaping = co Community 120 DAYS = 3/1/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ALBERTSON'S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR 98-0018 PROPOSAL: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow a Major Modification to the approved site plan for the Albertson's grocery store at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway (SDR 97-0011). The modification is to permit a 7,380 square foot expansion of the retail use partly into adjoining vacant space, and partly by enlarging the existing store footprint. APPLICANT: Musil Group Architects (MGA) Contact: Ed Craker 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNER: Albertson's, Inc. 250 Parkcenter Boulevard Boise, ID 83706 ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900 and WCTM 2S115BA, Tax Lot 00100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Staff finds that the proposed development will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 1 of 8 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S), THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark J. Roberts in the Planning Division (503) 639-4171. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating at least one (1) designated Van Accessible parking space. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter signed by the franchise waste hauler indicating that the expansion will not interfere in any way with continued servicing of the store. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application for a lot line adjustment to move the lot line to match the proposed new building footprint. The lot line adjustment must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: 4. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The Albertson's store is part of a retail center development approved under the City of Tigard, Land Use Case File# SDR 87-0005. Vicinity Information: The Albertson's store is bounded by SW Pacific Highway to the west and SW Durham Road to the north. Summerfield Drive, the main access to the Summerfield development, is located immediately across SW Durham Road from the site. The site adjoins residential development to the south and east; adjacent zoning is R-25 to the east, R-12 to the south and R-4.5 to the southeast. However, the Albertson's store itself only directly abuts R-4.5 zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The Albertson's grocery store anchors the retail center which includes a number of related commercial uses such as banks, restaurants and a variety of retail stores. The proposal is to expand the existing store to include an additional 7,300 square feet. The expansion will be achieved partly through remodeling existing space adjoining the east wall of the store. The new space was previously used as a retail store and would provide 3,080 square feet of additional gross floor area. An additional 4,300 square feet will be gained by expanding the existing footprint, mostly in the rear (south) of the store. NOTE: This application was submitted on October 7, 1998, before the 11/26/98 effective date of the revised Community Development Code. In conformance with ORS 227.178(3), the proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable code standards in effect at the time of submittal. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 2 of 8 SECTION IV. APF-LICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA ANA, i-INDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120) Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land use. The site is fully developed and includes approximately 19% landscaped area. As part of the proposed expansion, three planters will be lost at the northeast corner of the Albertson's store. The applicant has proposed to replace these with a new planting area of equal square footage at the east of the new store entry. The expansion area will not extend beyond the existing building line and will not remove any of the existing approved buffer area or screening. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The property immediately to the south of the site is zoned for single-family residential use and is currently developed with a single-family dwelling. The south part of the site contains the service and delivery areas of the Albertson's store. A concern was raised by a neighbor regarding the effectiveness of the existing screening, given the elevated grade of the shopping center site relative to the residential lots to the south. Although concerns have also been expressed regarding the hours at which deliveries occur, hours of operation are not restricted in the C-G zone. A site visit confirmed that the existing screening consists of a six-foot sight-obscuring fence and medium to large size trees spaced approximately 20 feet apart. The screening provided meets or exceed the standards of the development code. Therefore, this standard is met. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Screening of loading areas is discussed above. The planting areas to be removed are not islands within the parking lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 3 of 8 Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The shopping center site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway and on SW Durham Road. Street trees have been provided as part of the original development and no changes are proposed that would trigger additional street tree requirements. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided calculations indicating that approximately 19% of the overall site is landscaped. The proposed modification will result in no net loss of landscape area. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has proposed no changes to the site that would affect visual clearance areas. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor space for Food and Beverage Retail Sales, plus one space for every two employees. The total square footage of the existing Albertson's store is 43,130 square feet. The total parking required for a general retail sales use of this size is, therefore, 235 (43,130 200 = 215 plus 20 spaces for 40 employees). The additional net proposed square footage is 4,300 square feet which would require an additional 21 spaces. The conversion of the existing general retail space to food and beverage sales increases the parking requirement from one (1) space per 400 square feet to one (1) space per 200 square feet. The 3,080 square foot space will, therefore, require 15 (3,080 - 200) spaces where 7 (3,080 - 400) were previously required for a net increase of 8 parking spaces. This gives a grand total of 264 spaces (235 + 21 + 8) for the expanded Albertson's (a net increase of 29 spaces). The proposed site plan and narrative indicate that the overall site has a surplus of 58 spaces which can absorb the additional parking requirement. The shopping center has a 'shared parking' arrangement in place for this purpose. Based on the above analysis, this criterion has been met. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. As noted above, the proposed expansion of the Albertson's store increases the number of required parking spaces to a total of 264. This translates to a total bicycle parking requirement of 17 (264 ± 15). The existing store facility provides 9 bicycle spaces and the applicant has NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 4 of 8 proposed to provide an a itional 9 (for a total of 18) in comply,..ice with this standard. The site plan indicates that the additional bicycle rack will be placed adjacent to the proposed planter area, out of the way of pedestrian traffic. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the existing structure exceeds 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standards apply. The plans indicate that a loading dock exists on the site, therefore, this criterion has been met. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 100+ parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet or 2 accesses with a width of 30-foot and a pavement width of 24 feet. The previously approved site plan included more than 100 required parking spaces and provided the required number and size of access points. Nothing in the proposed modification would change the requirements of this standard and, therefore, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zone. Any new signs proposed must conform to the provisions listed in this code section. Any new signs proposed will be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application if necessary, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The site is fully developed and the proposal would not impact any tree over 12 inches in caliper. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164). As noted above, the site is fully developed and the adjacent streets and utilities that serve the site are fully improved. The adequacy of utilities to serve the proposed expansion will be addressed as part of the building permit process and any issues are addressed in the comments incorporated later in this report. The applicant has indicated that the proposed expansion will create no net increase in impervious surface area. Therefore, no storm drainage or water quality issues need be addressed. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Kittleson & Associates, Inc. The Kittleson study is based on a 9,230 square foot expansion of the Albertson's Store (6,590 net square feet) and concludes that the expansion will generate an additional 77 peak hour driveway trips (734 per day) and have a minimal impact on nearby intersections. Based on this conservative estimate of the project impact, Kittleson states that no mitigation will be required to accommodate the additional traffic volumes. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 5 of 8 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (Drainage) and 18.120.180.17(Signs). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The project site has an existing approved waste hauling program. The applicant must provide evidence from a waste hauler that the proposed expansion will not impede continued operation of the Albertson's waste storage and hauling service. Condition of Approval #2 requires that satisfactory evidence is submitted and approved prior to issuance of building permits. Upon compliance with the condition, this standard will be met. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The site is fully developed and contains no natural features. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and has offered no comments or objections to the plan. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of accessible parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All accessible parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. As noted above, the proposed expansion will increase Albertson's total parking requirement to 264 spaces. For this number of spaces, seven (7) accessible spaces must be provided including a minimum of one (1) van accessible space. The applicant's site plan indicates that nine (9) accessible spaces are provided, all of which are sized large enough to provide van accessibility. Condition of Approval #1 requires that the applicant submit a revised site plan indicating that at least one (1) accessible space is designated van accessible and signed appropriately. Upon compliance with the condition of approval, this standard will be met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 6 of 8 • Provisions and regulate...., of the underlying zone - Use CI...,sification: The applicant is proposing to expand an existing retail store. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62.030 lists General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The site is on an existing lot, therefore, the dimensional requirements for the lot do not apply to this decision. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district. Except as otherwise provided in Section 18.98, no building in the C-G zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height. As noted above, the site does abut a residential zone to the south. However, the proposed expansion would not bring the building any closer to the south property line than the existing condition. The proposed height of the expansion is the same as the existing structure. Therefore, the proposal does not propose to modify any of the existing conditions with respect to setbacks and building height, therefore, this standard does not apply. SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: • Exterior walls shall be 2-hour fire resistive construction with openings protected. • Maximum allowable square footage for overall building is 54,000 square feet. • Provide a survey map to trace legal description. • Provide new fire sprinkler calculations with new most remote calculated. • Connect roof drains to an approved drainage system. • This site does not comply with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) Section 505.2 for unlimited area. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The City currently has a fire line that will be placed under the proposed slab. The City is responsible for this line from the main to the detector. Double check valve assembly shall be relocated to a utility vault with a traffic rated lid to the paved area outside of the proposed addition. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Transportation, Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 7 of 8 Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD), The City of King City and ODOT were notified of the proposal and did not respond with comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: DECEMBER 31, 1998. THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY JANUARY 20, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 20, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. (j6/1C--k- byt December 31, 1998 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner • December 31, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager is\c u rp l n\mj r\s d r\s d r98-18.d ec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 8 of 8 e ..1 IT. , .., . 1 s.- . -::-...-,•., / / 45W DURHAM ROAD 4 Z ..,,,..:: ,::•..-:.,.:.......:',..,',.:',: :-..,.;.,- ,-.:.',':'',:..,,,, ., ,.-.. ..: .. , ... . • 0 . — . . ,,,, e hi .,,, . .• , . .. ...., (:)\‘ . .,-.,. , „ . . 111 \ ..'. '■ 1-LraZ ._.,---"---7) •-__ :: -±' !: -_,,‹. c. ' - .‘1,71colat"*. CI /. - !,0 • „0 olr, 77 r 7 r 1 1$,/- . ;If•.4‹... ' ' -1 ..,'' , krIt-tn. _..,'' ./1...-- 0 „..,../....;.--,4.-. -." 0 .„, ..!..V. .... :"i..., "-- T. - . .- ':,..K... g 0 ,.• ,,.1-, 9-,, ' -;'''. --, ...;, ' '- Orr.-4/. '<E-' i- •••■:: '-,' .' a - --. - Q.-.` Z // ) .:•I''..1, '''- -,AC5 '''P 2-4 l'• -. -;-- Z r " , ••• 1--1- an.° 41! ea 4t2 , = '. ' '" -'''''' Z a., 0 _ :.", i ih ILI. 1 •'" 'Y ' ■-% /4475 :..i.,P''';, , ricunm D 4 , . .* -..i.'r,. os ,,„„........ 9, 4 0s, = inigno-- % \ 11 , § , ...1 /41, ;., 1„,.., \\\ \ 6 11 mussmc Albertsons IRITZ•AlID ' V"; Cl. ,.; , t\\\,:\gp4\11 171n4'...,`"I'VJ47144,.. ... ,L.\\\\A -: --,-- i 1/ , A 18 / ...-:•:,- ,,. ,„. . ,„. .7 59 I tv,,v.,-1-1 I 1 .,'.:;---.,.-'• ,,.-',:'`,;',,. . .,•'. ..,:,.-f;:',::.•;,'.; ',4:,:.!,:,`:::,: ;;;,::: I :I "....■ 1 ii , \ \4 / t.'''''''' MI \ I / y;:- - Um –----- -- / ...);.-(=, tV•:,:.*\4‘ s-,‘ .\rtIA"4 — L . ‘. . ,... A" 0 / ,...:',:-—I' FARCEL I Z Nii':.\'‘'\.'s\P\\IA MARSHALLS \\''\\\\\\ > 1 „. , . . , .....:..,,,. ir.. 1,4‘.,„ \ . ,\ \\,,.:.,_\,.A,„1.\\I I- / :'-.;,;;:::,:::.: :.:::;,:: ii,; ;;i,g,..1.3,.," -- / ,. . . /.. ',* (,::....,,,,,..--', .';'.:-:;:,,ii,:--,,. ,....:4,,,,:3,.:,,,,',, -,..,,-.,..-.2,,,•:::::;:,',,•..,:,,,,,,f:..,,,,,:,,..;,,,,,,:,,,,.,--, ' . , ., . . CASE NO(S)&CASE NAME(S): SITE PLAN SDR 98-0018 EXHIBIT MAP G ALBERTSON ' S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION �,� ,,,• '' S - ii +iiF.�+.iOW••K:. , ....VI , CITY of TIGARD H i liS t9 , a` 1J D_, 4$"` ��# VICINITY MAP 0 ■0 . . A. .0. :iv • . .. .. - # ,,,. •.. OIL 10 DR � _ ,. `�t.� SDR 98-0018 ■. ♦ V �i ��� SUBJECT 4 ,q), # ALBERTSON ' S STORE re SITE ® 0A * _ MAJOR MODIFICATION ir ■. $ - "$01::.1 aumum�D IIII as ,a IL .1: NIT! N 9 � ■ I - y \ S - 1, . I # uIIYii I_ ��$�� TIT ■ i - .=---- - - 1 i 1 IY —` 1 \ ■ N 1 IiuiT ------r.,"" 0 200 400 600 Fwt I DO R CT , r=472 feet ' I I- I iI' City of Tigard 0 - 1 I Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 I (503)6394171 r • r http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Nov 16, 1998;C:lmagic\MAGICO2.APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS tit Nwtc- 1 zl��, �,��., REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOFTKiARD Community Devefopment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 TO: Brian Rager,Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner[x3151 Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. L Written comments provided below: f APPLAr-4.5T. -c-' -rr1 19-e vim-- t.13-r I A- 1,t7r 11J dbeASt 1►1 IMPa-Vtws AL-eAk sts..As - F1 '1;4%�� P 1146 arm rye- rzt4AL1StoLl 15 fa i t s'f &I,,D'Ali 6C- Pa Ii 4 TN►S -Wage t>2-46 ., sr•R-�. DR-4)1.047e Nsi.e Ark) r,10 A1 s - t�s/Rk-iZi V-2 Eec .nRa> (P(ease provide the fodowing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Number(sl: 1 I SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS a REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping 4 Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner 1x3151 Phone:[503)639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0018 r ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30. 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (rP(ease provide the fodowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: r,,.\0)C I Phone Numbertsl: a 2 w SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS 11/30/98 15:29 FAX 503 6403525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 0001 *- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD .' Community Development• Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 ? i ,., . ?! ? 7 ,;;, TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program I, �9a FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF COIITACT: — Roberts,Associate Planner[x315] Phone:(5031 63941171 Fax 1503]684T29T RE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SOBI 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION < A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE ND YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: LMONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. I • are un_• - • res•o•• • the ab•v- •-te, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter Written comments provided below: NAW'k (please provide the fa flTowing information)Name of Peraonts1 Commenting: �� q I Phone Number[s1: nRFni IFAT FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O TIIGARD Community Development Shaping Getter Community DATE: November 16,1998 <<.. : - 71998 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program \�1 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone:(5031639-4171 Fax:(5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30. 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. ITPLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V �► (Pkase provide the fodowing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: 1 Phone Number's]: SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O IIGARD Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 TO: David Scott,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone:(5031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR]98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. L Written comments provided below: - i &AA _ .'!AK �ct�-r�!_s b <_ .:� J��•7!�iTMJ•rs,•� _.. . ><— Iwo) , ' .Z -14 f v �� fI is o c. . - 3- 41. aC/ _ tv . . - . ✓ • y r � /i `l. �l•n v)i API ) flee 1310.• moo+/M L*}.i o.1/ 1, ,A1-1-_k_ 714, v i f /^1 >m ° 1 r u'( 'C4 V Conn.(e lets .e/r 4 / fI' 4n 44,07/7/-trv".e r✓,••t ryrJ- CC) �k'J I t f //c r� �v f' r'v w,�17 w 1 i UI1l I«74,•o S�S� Z— 7 si u a )i�.,, `••j art 44 (Please provide the folrowing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: I Phone Number's]: / /1/1- /9 I SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS .NOU-30 98 17:43 FROM:WASHCO LAND DEU SERU 503-681-2988 TO:7"9 684 7297 PAGE:01/02 RECEIVED PLANNING �/0 s �, �`� a i{_. DEC Q i 1998 REQU E � ENTS CITY OF TIGARD \ ;��;ZU Community(Deve1Jptnrnt CITY OF TIGARD \c: .: �' S&apiug3i Better Community 4O`,J DATE: November 16,1998 .3-44 ll 2r TO: Phil Healy,Wa.Co_Dept.of Land Ilse a Transportation FROM: City 0!Tigard Plannln DIVlsion STAFF CONTACT: MJ.eo errt.AssocIFati[ �4n9 151 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISOR108.0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store l�ted at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 1 8,120 and 18.164. ...-x Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMME S : (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 3t} 1g96). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by Me above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division. 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. � Please contact _. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _yo Written comments provided below z Camv t ri".cse,_— /. . _ i-- (QNrctse prowade thcJutlrunng u urmation)Name of Personfsl Commenting: / / AP or[Phone Numberi[al: . ycr..g/3/ SON J$-(k]1ES ALBERTSON'S STORE MA.lOR MOOif■CATION PROPO.SAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • r� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI'O T;ARD Community cDeve(opment Sfiaping,a Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager DEC 0 3 1998 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner 1x3151 Phone:(503)639-4111 Fax[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR198-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: I4-AA /1— FILE L-u&- –11 Ai 1"1I SE e(.rar o j/1v 7716- 'Pao(V,E.0 SL,A-15 . Tide am,/ is keiect.i.chsLE0 / - -rims LNG Frzt' T .02AI/'. rQ -7-146 7Er Et zt'2.bot.4&6 (IIl1L v4 46E:E AVEiY1611 . 76- Gir)-r,r Oi t2 Li les;u ry 'bOt1f3L4e eM&: V4 V 5/I1z.,6- 15E .eEcre- To . Cfritiry v.©ci I-4 4- T24FF"iG - 1.1--rEr L.t') T Tide /f4VEZ7 /1/L&4- Oix_TS/0L 7-.E /®,QI/'C-L') Arn(7- c (Please provide the fodcrwing information)Name Of Persons)Commenting: SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS J REQUEST FOR COMMENTS , CI TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community cDevefopment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 NOV 1 9 1998 CITY OF TIGARD TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone:(5031 639-4171 Fax:(5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION filA request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson`s store located at SW Durham Road r and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tase provide the foffolving information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: -- A,,.) „g-- 1 J Phone Numberisl: '1 cc 11 ( , SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAUREQUEST rOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O ax TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,1998 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:(5031 684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0018 r ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION < A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MONDAY - NOVEMBER 30, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: I Phone Number's): I SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS EQUEST FOR COMMENTS _ NOTIFICATION LIbf FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS �' �f I —/- -.IC[T Aria[C) [D [Sl [WI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ®Place ter min la Library CR Mktg) I FILE NOIS).: -- '18 —t;cz)lg FILENAME(S): -/t-NAALEISE_iiiig . CITY OFFICES _ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Planninosup.rvnor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Dvan..SK.*.onnKi.n. /POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,c.m.o.«.nnononr.r 14 BUILDING DIV./David Scott,Budding onkud /ENGINEERING DEPTJBnan Rager,aa,,,M.A..,«.Eogn«r vz'VATER DEPT./Michael Miller,o,«nron.M.n.g.r _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,CCR..ro _OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*ZTUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* 'UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY * Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS , _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR. DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE _Mike Matteucci,rv«srom OO d.C .d. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street, NE • _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ w US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,crohMw� „« a g.r .coo, natw _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel H Greenaway uie,cr..rv ..Coordinator(CPAa/ZOA$) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 ,J.CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97310-0590 Po land,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT,REGION 1 * _ Brent Curtis(CPA's) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,ovlpen.Res.coon _ Scott King(CPAs) —CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _ Mike Borreson(Engrn..) David Knowles,Planning Bureau or. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _ Jim Tice IIG.t Portland Building 106, Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _ T om Harry(Cason(PI App, 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue 4 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * ,Phil Healy(ca,,.a PI App.( Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,P.rmn sp.aa■e _ Sr.Cartographer(crwzcA-Ms In PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES . —BURLINGTON NORTHERN/ SANTA FE R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _TCI CABLEVISION OF OR. Reed Fay, Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Road 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97201 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 _COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr, Region Manager Michael Kiser, Project Planner 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue,Suite 2120 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Seattle,WA 98104-4037 _GENERAL TELEPHONE Elaine Self. Engineering _OREGON ELECTRIC R/R _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. R/R _US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: 0R030546 (Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RIR Preclassor) Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Lon Domey, Engineering Dept. Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay,Division Supenntendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street, Rm. 110 1313 W. 11th Street Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97204 Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 * - INDICATES AUTOMATIC MOTIFICATIOM IF MUMS rrsO' OF TAE SUBJECT•iorism BOA AMT/AIL CST,/ROJLCTTS. fraorsCr ILANMLJtt Is assso i1SLE tea/MOICATIMC IABr1ES TO NOn,T/ hapatty\masterslsfcnotce.mst 16-Jan-98 A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .11: CITY OF TIOARD Community cDevefopment Shaping Better Community gA'A7tE OF OGON ) County of Washington )ss City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'2igard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR:y SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSON'S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: V' I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR:[ _ I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type.Kind of Notice) FOR: . I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 31St day of December,1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 31St of December,1998, postage- epaid. /,----n z �� ,e c l ê A [n/& (Person : "reps er Notic:) - L G- Subscribed and sworn/affirmed be ore me on the A day of . , 19/ ' .�. OFFICIAL SEAL edeziii_. )1 DIANE M JELDERKS ` a NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON `,; COMMISSION P 42 MY /.77 COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBETEMBE SEPTEMBER 07,t990 My Commission Expires: � EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0018 CITY oF„aARo ALBERTSON'S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION shaping)!Berms c =ry 120 DAYS = 3/1/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: ALBERTSON'S SUPERMARKET EXPANSION CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR 98-0018 PROPOSAL: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow a Major Modification to the approved site plan for the Albertson's grocery store at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway (SDR 97-0011). The modification is to permit a 7,380 square foot expansion of the retail use partly into adjoining vacant space, and partly by enlarging the existing store footprint. APPLICANT: Musil Group Architects (MGA) Contact: Ed Craker 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Wilsonville, OR 97070 OWNER: Albertson's, Inc. 250 Parkcenter Boulevard Boise, ID 83706 ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900 and WCTM 2S115BA, Tax Lot 00100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. SECTION II. DECISION Staff finds that the proposed development will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 1 of 8 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT(S), THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark J. Roberts in the Planning Division (503) 639-4171. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan indicating at least one (1) designated Van Accessible parking space. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter signed by the franchise waste hauler indicating that the expansion will not interfere in any way with continued servicing of the store. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an application for a lot line adjustment to move the lot line to match the proposed new building footprint. The lot line adjustment must be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: 4. All site improvements shall be installed as approved, per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The Albertson's store is part of a retail center development approved under the City of Tigard, Land Use Case File# SDR 87-0005. Vicinity Information: The Albertson's store is bounded by SW Pacific Highway to the west and SW Durham Road to the north. Summerfield Drive, the main access to the Summerfield development, is located immediately across SW Durham Road from the site. The site adjoins residential development to the south and east; adjacent zoning is R-25 to the east, R-12 to the south and R-4.5 to the southeast. However, the Albertson's store itself only directly abuts R-4.5 zoning. Site Information and Proposal Description: The Albertson's grocery store anchors the retail center which includes a number of related commercial uses such as banks, restaurants and a variety of retail stores. The proposal is to expand the existing store to include an additional 7,300 square feet. The expansion will be achieved partly through remodeling existing space adjoining the east wall of the store. The new space was previously used as a retail store and would provide 3,080 square feet of additional gross floor area. An additional 4,300 square feet will be gained by expanding the existing footprint, mostly in the rear (south) of the store. NOTE: This application was submitted on October 7, 1998, before the 11/26/98 effective date of the revised Community Development Code. In conformance with ORS 227.178(3), the proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable code standards in effect at the time of submittal. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 2 of 8 SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.120.180 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.80 (Planned Developments), 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120) Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land use. The site is fully developed and includes approximately 19% landscaped area. As part of the proposed expansion, three planters will be lost at the northeast corner of the Albertson's store. The applicant has proposed to replace these with a new planting area of equal square footage at the east of the new store entry. The expansion area will not extend beyond the existing building line and will not remove any of the existing approved buffer area or screening. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The property immediately to the south of the site is zoned for single-family residential use and is currently developed with a single-family dwelling. The south part of the site contains the service and delivery areas of the Albertson's store. A concern was raised by a neighbor regarding the effectiveness of the existing screening, given the elevated grade of the shopping center site relative to the residential lots to the south. Although concerns have also been expressed regarding the hours at which deliveries occur, hours of operation are not restricted in the C-G zone. A site visit confirmed that the existing screening consists of a six-foot sight-obscuring fence and medium to large size trees spaced approximately 20 feet apart. The screening provided meets or exceed the standards of the development code. Therefore, this standard is met. Screening - Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Screening of loading areas is discussed above. The planting areas to be removed are not islands within the parking lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 3 of 8 Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or • large). The shopping center site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway and on SW Durham Road. Street trees have been provided as part of the original development and no changes are proposed that would trigger additional street tree requirements. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Developments within the C-G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided calculations indicating that approximately 19% of the overall site is landscaped. The proposed modification will result in no net loss of landscape area. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.102) Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has proposed no changes to the site that would affect visual clearance areas. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.(C)(1) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space for each 200 square feet of gross floor space for Food and Beverage Retail Sales, plus one space for every two employees. The total square footage of the existing Albertson's store is 43,130 square feet. The total parking required for a general retail sales use of this size is, therefore, 235 (43,130 200 = 215 plus 20 spaces for 40 employees). The additional net proposed square footage is 4,300 square feet which would require an additional 21 spaces. The conversion of the existing general retail space to food and beverage sales increases the parking requirement from one (1) space per 400 square feet to one (1) space per 200 square feet. The 3,080 square foot space will, therefore, require 15 (3,080 ± 200) spaces where 7 (3,080 _ 400) were previously required for a net increase of 8 parking spaces. This gives a grand total of 264 spaces (235 + 21 + 8) for the expanded Albertson's (a net increase of 29 spaces). The proposed site plan and narrative indicate that the overall site has a surplus of 58 spaces which can absorb the additional parking requirement. The shopping center has a 'shared parking' arrangement in place for this purpose. Based on the above analysis, this criterion has been met. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. As noted above, the proposed expansion of the Albertson's store increases the number of required parking spaces to a total of 264. This translates to a total bicycle parking requirement of 17 (264 ± 15). The existing store facility provides 9 bicycle spaces and the applicant has NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 4 of 8 proposed to provide an additional 9 (for a total of 18) in compliance with this standard. The site plan indicates that the additional bicycle rack will be placed adjacent to the proposed planter area, out of the way of pedestrian traffic. Therefore, this criterion has been met. • Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The total square footage of the existing structure exceeds 10,000 square feet, therefore, the off-street loading standards apply. The plans indicate that a loading dock exists on the site, therefore, this criterion has been met. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.108) Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 100+ parking spaces provide at least 1 access with a minimum width of 50 feet and a minimum pavement width of 40 feet or 2 accesses with a width of 30-foot and a pavement width of 24 feet. The previously approved site plan included more than 100 required parking spaces and provided the required number and size of access points. Nothing in the proposed modification would change the requirements of this standard and, therefore, this standard has been met. Signs (18.114 ) Section 18.114.130(D) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zone. Any new signs proposed must conform to the provisions listed in this code section. Any new signs proposed will be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Because signs will be addressed through a separate process and application if necessary, this criterion does not apply. Tree Removal (18.150) Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The site is fully developed and the proposal would not impact any tree over 12 inches in caliper. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.164). As noted above, the site is fully developed and the adjacent streets and utilities that serve the site are fully improved. The adequacy of utilities to serve the proposed expansion will be addressed as part of the building permit process and any issues are addressed in the comments incorporated later in this report. The applicant has indicated that the proposed expansion will create no net increase in impervious surface area. Therefore, no storm drainage or water quality issues need be addressed. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Kittleson & Associates, Inc. The Kittleson study is based on a 9,230 square foot expansion of the Albertson's Store (6,590 net square feet) and concludes that the expansion will generate an additional 77 peak hour driveway trips (734 per day) and have a minimal impact on nearby intersections. Based on this conservative estimate of the project impact, Kittleson states that no mitigation will be required to accommodate the additional traffic volumes. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 5 of 8 Section 18.120.180(A)(2) through 18.120.180(A)(17) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of • 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation), 18.120.180.13 (Parking), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping), 18.120.180.15 (Drainage) and 18.120.180.17(Signs). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The project site has an existing approved waste hauling program. The applicant must provide evidence from a waste hauler that the proposed expansion will not impede continued operation of the Albertson's waste storage and hauling service. Condition of Approval #2 requires that satisfactory evidence is submitted and approved prior to issuance of building permits. Upon compliance with the condition, this standard will be met. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6)-inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The site is fully developed and contains no natural features. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the applicant's proposal and has offered no comments or objections to the plan. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020(M) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of accessible parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All accessible parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. As noted above, the proposed expansion will increase Albertson's total parking requirement to 264 spaces. For this number of spaces, seven (7) accessible spaces must be provided including a minimum of one (1) van accessible space. The applicant's site plan indicates that nine (9) accessible spaces are provided, all of which are sized large enough to provide van accessibility. Condition of Approval #1 requires that the applicant submit a revised site plan indicating that at least one (1) accessible space is designated van accessible and signed appropriately. Upon compliance with the condition of approval, this standard will be met. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 6 of 8 Provisions and regulations of the underlying zone - Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to expand an existing retail store. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as General Retail Sales. Code Section 18.62.030 lists General Retail Sales as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet for parcels in the C-G zoning district. The site is on an existing lot, therefore, the dimensional requirements for the lot do not apply to this decision. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no front, side, or rear yard setback is required except a 20 foot side and rear yard setback shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district. Except as otherwise provided in Section 18.98, no building in the C-G zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height. As noted above, the site does abut a residential zone to the south. However, the proposed expansion would not bring the building any closer to the south property line than the existing condition. The proposed height of the expansion is the same as the existing structure. Therefore, the proposal does not propose to modify any of the existing conditions with respect to setbacks and building height, therefore, this standard does not apply. SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: • Exterior walls shall be 2-hour fire resistive construction with openings protected. • Maximum allowable square footage for overall building is 54,000 square feet. • Provide a survey map to trace legal description. • Provide new fire sprinkler calculations with new most remote calculated. • Connect roof drains to an approved drainage system. • This site does not comply with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) Section 505.2 for unlimited area. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: • The City currently has a fire line that will be placed under the proposed slab. The City is responsible for this line from the main to the detector. Double check valve assembly shall be relocated to a utility vault with a traffic rated lid to the paved area outside of the proposed addition. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Transportation, Unified Sewerage Agency and PGE have reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 7 of 8 Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD), The City of King City and ODOT were notified of the proposal and did not respond with comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: DECEMBER 31, 1998. THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON WEDNESDAY JANUARY 20, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 20, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. jitN\64)(Cc December 31, 1998 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE PR J Associate Planner r � -- December 31, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager \c u rp l n\mj r\s d r\s d r98-18.d e c NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 98-0018 - ALBERTSONS SUPERMARKET EXPANSION PAGE 8 of 8 . —-— • • i ).. 4.4 ._ . ., .. ....., J • , --- --...,..•....,._.., m.........., . (-S.W. DURHAM ROAD4 -------r Z /,/ o :4„t're.-1 " '' /4 , 0 ! .Z"'" r r 6 ,, 1■. 0 0 0 f%. I . > .1 •9..._`. n_ .:....0?- 1;- 7 ...- ocl T 'it , „....... -iiiii 4 .....-„....• , . ,. ....,. , , ...... 2,.... . ',e-- 2 0 -- ,- . l•:.- --* "....-;.i i :2,3 * .:,,r"..X, _ = -.... = Z • • 7. Mr, lir„ '.....e.... 6- ..,efi ...--:,...' . , ..,...5 A........; 0 1 v... ,.111,t1104 PA=1-5t Mablell. :'.•, = Z..:t- • ..,.--, _.....73 _._. ........„_-,_ .•.,., ;;,- ,!.. 4 .) ... z...... riz . : oil. _ •' S 2 0 Z 6 1- i \ 6 4% 2 Albertson' . ,- CCCC SS MC CUM■MI ,. 4.•..i CL. PS..1714VaIT 414; 1 ii. ' .: ; \WCTXVII,C., ' / ,. ,:. ,,,.., —. .. ., • '- - i ;;AU , .s —. ,A r. / . ' IX / /4,11 , iy). i; 4\A\\:.\\\t. — 2 , '`..:r` 9, 1.•,,,\'•\.\\,\N \ F. is i \ /I :7 12 1 '-€'04'". 'c' .`,:j 1 Vg:If.7., -';■.47:ro:F:O7 -F; I . . - , II '1 Z2 L :I wal■ i tatt.L.2 1 ___ ..,, 10 —._.J L .. u.. i I 11) . \%stri . v , %,N\' \., .9\ V\111 MARSHALLS 1 >. i i ,\\\ \\ ,® / ...._---..„4„::. \\„,,,, ,„,‘„, iii. A.\\, ,,,\_\14:1\1,\.4 .,..:: \ \\ — ,: / ,,..„., ......... eikorensenims CASE NO(S)a CASE NAME(S): SITE PLAN SDR 98-0018 EXHIBIT MAP G ALBERTSON ' S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION , v,Z it •• ' 1;1; ji■■■■ ■ • .•; CITY of T I G A R D ♦ ' S ++~ ., GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Is ' ' ` ���� ••• '` �� � '►��' VICINITY MAP 70• DR 4 . o ♦ ro SDR 98-0018 *I♦ ♦ W, �i SUBJECT ��� • ,� ♦♦ � ALBERTSON ' S STORE ����� SITE ® `:; 4 i MAJOR MODIFICATION i �. ® — .e sue, 4(.0 _ ..., jilt 1 -- rf11RHAM RD iii as U. AT A If ii I. r ■ - i y T■— 4 6 � o' i . istersol Oil ' i r -- " I - ' NA iii 0 200 400 600 Feet DO I T ��_ 1'=472 feet _ _ ■ 41#.11 1 I :Ali II I 11111 City of Tigard -- _I �I I I Information on this map is for general location only and 1 should De verified with the Development Services Division. """„� 13125 ar.SW OR Hall Blvd 1 1 Tigard,OR 9171 �.96/N:7c\I4Z1.1U —I ..,' — p(503)63171 �, _ r htt Ilwww.ci.ti ard.or.us Community Development Plot date Nov 16, 1998;C:lmagic\MAGICO2.APR J y EXHI 2S110DC-00400 2S110DC-00500 DURHAM/99 ASSOCIATES LTD PTNSH LUTON ROBERT C 11200 ROCKVILLE PIKE 11445 SW SUMMERFIELD DR ROCKVILLE,MD 20852 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DC-00600 25111:--00700 CONGREGATE CARE ASSET V LTD PTN CONGREGA - •-E ASSET V LTD PTN PO BOX 12188 PO BO. 88 SALEM,OR 97309 - EM,OR 97309 2S110DC-01000 IDC-01300 SUMMERFIELD ASSOCIATES LLC LUTON ••: - C 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 1144 S ' RFIELD DR PORTLAND,OR 97201 ARD,OR 97224 2S115AB-00200 2S115AB-00300 WOODSPRING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FLEMING ALVY C&KATHLEEN A 851 SW SIXTH AVE STE 1400 16280 SW 113TH PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S115AB-00500 25115AB-01400 SCOTT ALEX G CRAIG JAMES N AND VICKI J 16380 SW 113TH AVE 16325 SW 113TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S115AB-01500 - 115AB-01600 MESKEL DURWOOD D&DOROTHY J BIT ►.S INGS LTD •• • ERSHIP 16285 SW 113TH BY FOR '- ERTIES INC TIGARD,OR 97224 • OSWEGO,OR = '35 2S115AB-01800 2S 5AB-01900 BIT HOLDINGS LTD PARTNERSHIP BIT H• SINGS % 'ARTNERSHIP BY FORUM PROPERTIES INC BY FO- '-OPERTIES INC LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 • OSWEGO, •- •7035 2S115BA-00100 5BA-00101 IBJ SCHRODER BANK&TRUST CO BIT He• NGS % 'ARTNERSHIP PO BOX 20 BY FORU '`•-ERTIES INC BOISE,ID 83726 LA •SWEGO,O• • '35 MUSIL GROUP ARCHITECTS (MGA) ALBERTSON'S, INC. CONTACT: ED CRAKER 250 PARKCENTER BOULEVARD 9150 SW PIONEER COURT, SUITE T BOISE, ID 83706 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 ALBERTSON'S, INC. GENERAL OFFICES 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. BOX 20 BOISE, IDAHO 83726 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 9 2 9 2 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]98-0018 *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice >ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION< •13121312 5 SW Hall Blvd. The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Site 5 ,Orego 97223 • Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the 0 Duplicate Affidavit Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 !Accounts Payable • square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3,080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway. WCTM 2S115AB,Tax Lot 01900; and 2S115BA,Tax Lot 00100. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Highway. ZONE: General Commercial,C-G. The purpose of the general STATE OF OREGON, commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. )ss Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) services, lodge,fraternal and civic assembly,parking,amusement,animal I, Kathy Snyclp r sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Director, or his principal clerk, of the i t-r3—m Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, g a ua1at in Times 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120,and 18.164. a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 _ _ and 193.020; published at Ti gard in the f ? -- SLSSy�' aforesaid county and state; that the �' • r % - ell*Albertson' s Major Modification / ! -i / / q - 4, i.13 r+ a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the .ii 9D i entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and 9, / /� :'4,RIP consecutive in the following issues: sr ? /' s �� '$' December 31 ,1998 1 �___1 l Jill 000' 1 `; Li ,� Ii H Subscribed and sworn to beA0- me this3J ct aay of nPoPmber. , 1998_ � tit IL ll�— ' - iAl un t .r I 11111 Y Mme �� � �_ Notary lic for Oregon ., N , -'- i 1111 IIW \ �., -. + ! I '-Tim.�' i-, C, C _ 1 � 11 ;r My Commission Expires: I MY cO��I CO / -7 AFFIDAVIT { t--� I v ; The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on January 20, 1999. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten(10)days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,January 20,1999. TT9292—Publish December 31, 1998. ! 0i1‘frilr''W # ii , L7*U i ITV hr T,; i<;; ER OEOORAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ► �' '! NOTIFICATION ■ + / -IL �1► AREA MAP 110) mug OIL 110, 4. Illir 111 al., ir k:11011001 00 �� �� �ti0 4 251100500400 231101C00700 44/4- it SUBJECT �J siioicioos .�� �p `: / SDR 98-0018 SITE 6 Vs Ise. �1 ALBERTSON 'S STORE S11 DCOO500 - m ®, MAJOR MODIFICATION 41001300 W I /II ,. , . \ 5110180 . \ 1. Pl. It IN k ir , � ', 2311511011200 231151100101 I III — 25115510030 N Z:1150M1500 Aft 200500 0 200 104 � F+1'=072 feet olitili City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. -7 13125 SW Hall Blvd ihh...i . MEL.'" -, http./Nwnv.ci tigard or us Community Development Plot date: Nov 16, 1998;C:\magic\MAGICO2.APR APPLICANT MATERIALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A4\- APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 16200 Pacific Hwy. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 1 South 15AB Lot 01900 Case No.(s): sb/e 9? '40 if . S/15 � - 0/ ?00 Other Case No.(s): Site Size: 172 , 520 S Q.F T. Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Albertsons Date: /0,'7/9 Address: 250 Parkcenter Blvd. Phone: 208 . 395 .6283 City: Boise, ID Zip: 83706 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: MGA Architects Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 9150 SW Pioneer Ct. 'Tphone: 503 .685 .7350 City: Wilsonville Zip: 97070 CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written Rev.4121/97 i:lcurpinUnasterMsdra.doc authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ��11 PROPOSAL SUMMARY .1 Application Elements Submitted: 12- Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site ,/ V Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): e ' Authorization C 1 Expansion of existing structure by 4, 300 s . f . O Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Er Site/Plot Plan (NET) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) p Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:°x 11-) f E Applicant's Stateme - �/ (#of copies based o pre-app check list) o .instruction Cost stimate B' USA Sewer Use Information Card A (Distributed/completed at application submittal) 1�\ ((Filing Fee (under$100.000) $ SOC.00 ($100,000-$999,999) �$1,600.OQ_ / ($1 Million&Over) $1,7$0.00 (+$5/$10.000) 1 List any VARIANCE. CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NONE APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • 11 . . •a• - ►-a• .r- • •:r 1 • •• . - 5 • :.a• ►-r 1 •1 I • 11 • •.: • 1.• 1 W • • •11 ••�- ;:• ••1 1 = subject 12=1 ty. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and (imitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based cn this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false_ • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 3 day of ��� . 19 ALBERTSON'S, Inc. I RY: . Owner's Signature Owner's Signature William H. Arnold y Vice President, Real Estate Law Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada) On this 4 day of 2_ , 199/ , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William H. Arnold, to me known to be the Vice President, Real Estate Law, of Albertson's, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the said instrument is the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS MY HAND and official seal hereto affixed the day, month and year in this certificate first above written. My commission expires: lAW-dtit aiet. 7t. Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho. o ��.,,........s,..� Residing at Boise, Idaho. ss t CLEF•.. •: •• •, i ro3 : �C T AR r` J) fir • �.� ; * : P B L1 4 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping(Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 3/1/99 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0018 FILE TITLE: ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICANT(S): Musil Group Architects (MGA) OWNER(S): Albertson's, Inc. Contact: Ed Craker 250 Parkcenter Blvd. 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Boise, ID 83706 Wilsonville, OR 97070 (503) 685-7350 (208) 395-6283 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval for a Major Modification to the Albertson's store located at SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. The applicant proposes to expand the existing grocery store by 7,380 square feet. The net expansion will include 4,300 square feet of new footprint area and 3.080 square feet of expansion into adjoining vacant retail space. LOCATION: 16200 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S115AB, Tax Lot 01900. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of SW Durham Road and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: General Commercial; C-G. The purpose of the general commercial areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. Permitted uses in the C-G zoning district are public agency administrative services, lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusement, animal sales and services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: MONDAY NOVEMBER 30,1998 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: THURSDAY DECEMBER 10,1998 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM_ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP K LANDSCAPE PLAN X NARRATIVE K SITE PLAN K TREE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY K ARBORIST REPORT OTHER STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner 1x3151 SDR 98-0018 ALBERTSON'S STORE MAJOR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS October 26, 1998 CITY OF TIGARD Ed Craker OREGON Musil Group Architects 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - SDR 98-0018 (Albertsons Expansion) Dear Mr. Craker: The City received your request for approval of the above referenced grocery store expansion project at SW Pacific Highway and SW Durham Road. The director has determined, as provided under TMC 18.120.070, that a Major Modification is necessary because one or more of the changes under 18.120.070.B is proposed. Specifically, the Traffic Study indicates that an increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site is expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day (Kittleson Traffic Study, Table 2, p. 5), the limit provided by Criterion #7. Please note, however, that the Kittleson study is premised on a net expansion of 6,590 square feet, not 4,300 square feet as you indicate. A Major Modification request is processed as a Site Development Review application under TMC 18.120. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. The following clarifications and additional information are required before staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1 . 15 additional copies of your application materials. The City requires a total of 18 copies of the application materials for Site Development Review. 2. Application narrative addressing the Site Development Review approval criteria under TMC 18.120.180. 3. Additional fees of $630. Based on the $1,900,000 cost estimate you have provided, the City has assessed the total Site Development Review fees for your project at $2,330. Site Development Review fees for projects over $1 Million are $1,780 plus $5 per additional $10,000 of project cost ($1,780 plus $5x90 = $2,230). 4. Confirm actual net and gross square footage of the proposed expansion. Once the required information has been submitted, staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, 4kjut M. J. Roberts Associate Planner is\curpin\mjr\sdr\sdr98-18.inc c: SDR 98-0018 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON November 4, 1998 Ed Craker Musil Group Architects 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal (Albertsons Expansion) - SDR 98-0018 Dear Mr. Craker: This letter is to inform you that your application for Site Development Review (City file reference: SDR 98-0018) is considered complete as of November 2, 1998, and has been accepted by the Planning Division. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, M. J. Roberts Associate Planner i:\cu rp I n\mj r\sd r\sd r98-18.cm p c: SDR 98-0018 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 /Varral , ✓2 4 © OD October 30,1998 ArchitecMe City of Tigard Planning Planning Department Interiors 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Site Development Approval per Approval Standards 18.120.180 This application is for an increase in the square footage of the Albertsons store located at 16200 SW Pacific Highway by 7,380 square feet, and reduction of the square footage of the adjacent retail shops building by 3,080 square feet. The total building area increase will be 4,300 square feet. This project is located in NE 1/4 of the NW '/4 of section 15, and in the NW 1/4 of the NE '/ of section 15, T2S, R1 W, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Fact Sheet from Section 18.120.180 A. The director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: 1. Provisions from the following chapters: Chapter 18.84 This project is not in a 100-year floodplain, nor is there any known natural drainageway. There are no wetlands, steep slopes, or unstable ground. This site is currently fully developed. Chapter 18.94 This application does not include any Mobile Home provisions. Chapter 18.92 This application does not propose the construction of any residential homes. Chapter 18.144 This application is not requesting any Accessory Structures. Chapter 18.96 The two major streets Pacific Highway and Durham Road Musil Group Architects which border this project are currently developed. This application does not propose any changes. 915o sw Pioneer Court Suite T Chapter 18.98 The code allows for a non residential building to be 75 feet Wilsonville,OR 97070 in height. This existing structure is 28foot-8inches in height, • • and that height will remain unchanged. Tel 503.6857350 r:\alb\98-177\docs\ctystds.doc Page I of 5 Fox: 503.682 3348 www.mgoi.com 4 Chapter 18.100 The landscaping for this center was designed and installed in 1987 per the prevailing ordinance which required a 15% percent landscape coverage. The actual amount of present landscaping is in excess of 19%of the total gross site area. Three planters will be lost at the northeast corner adjacent to the Albertsons store. A planting area that is the same in area as those deleted planters will be added east of the new store entry. Chapter 18.102 The traffic study completed by Kittelson & Associates, dated August 18, 1998 states: "Operation of the signalized intersections of Highway 99W/SW Durham Road, and SW Durham Road/Summerfield Road/Albertson's access, will not be significantly affected by the proposed expansion. No mitigation will be required to accommodate the additional traffic volumes." Chapter 18.106 The traffic study compiled for this review does not indicate any revisions to the existing parking locations or vehicle circulation. Chapter 18.108 The traffic study compiled for this review does not indicate any revisions to the existing automotive circulation, or site ingress/egress. Chapter 18.114 The present building signs may be replaced during the phase of construction however; they will be reviewed under a separate permit based on the current Municipal Code. Chapter 18.150 The proposed expansion will involve removing three sidewalk planters, which do not contain any trees. The planter will be in the same area, and will follow the existing landscaping design philosophy and similar planting material will be utilized. Chapter 18.164 a. The traffic study compiled for this review does not indicate any revisions to the existing street configurations. b. There are no proposed revisions to existing easements. c. There are no parks connected with this project. d. The storm sewer and sanitary sewer are not being revised. e. No Public Utilities will be changed. f. Any monuments displaced during the construction will be replaced in an acceptable manner. r:\alb\98-I77\docs\ctystds.doc Page 2 of 5 DOD A 2. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: a. The existing building location was previously reviewed and accepted by the City of Tigard. This application does not seek to revise that approval. 3. Exterior Elevations: a. This section applies to residential buildings this facility is commercial. 4. Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses: a. This existing center has a landscape buffer around the entire perimeter of the property. And is based on the previously approved site development application. See drawing"A" Site Design b. Within the existing buffer area at the rear of the buildings there is a chain link fence with vertical slats at the property line it is intended to screen the commercial property from the adjacent residential property. c. The compatibility will not be changed by the addition of the building to the east. This will increase the overall mass, however the set back will not change and the access drive will remain unchanged. 5. Privacy and Noise: a. The existing structures are located such that all the public activity is in the front of the buildings, and the non-public areas are in the rear. b. The regular noise that occurs in the non-public areas is limited to business hours. c. There will be some additional noise generated during construction, however this will be for the limited time of construction, and the noise levels and hours of operation are established by the building department d. The existing site lighting is screened from the adjacent residential property. This application does not propose the addition of any other light fixtures. 6. Private Outdoor Area: a. This section applies to residential use and our facility is commercial. 7. Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: a. This section applies to residential use and our facility is commercial. r:\alb\95-177\docs\ctystds.doc Page 3 of 5 © OCI 8. Greenway within a 100 year floodplain: a. This section applies to new projects involving landfill. This application involves an existing fully developed commercial shopping center. 9. Demarcation of Public, Semipublic, and Private Spaces: There are two main areas in this center: a. The public area in the front of the stores. This public area contains the parking, sidewalks, and the entries into each establishment. b. The other area is the semipublic area at the rear receiving area. This area is open and for crime prevention prepossesses easily defines the activities, and persons within the immediate vicinity. 10. Crime Prevention and Safety: a. This expansion will not have any windows, laundry facilities, or mail boxes. b. The only new light will be a light over the exit door on the eastside of the new expansion. This is a duplication of the light over the existing exit on the current east elevation The light will be over 140 feet from the rear property line. 11. Access and Circulation: a. No change is proposed for the current access drives into the shopping center. b. No change is proposed to the existing traffic circulation patterns. c. No change is proposed to the pedestrian and bicycleways, other than the new handicapped ramp proposed in the front of the Albertsons building. 12. Public Transportation: a. The scope of this proposal should not require additional Public Transportation requirements. 13. Parking: a. The present parking configuration has been previously approved, and the basic design will be retained. b. The current loading dock for this facility, is adequate and will not be affected by this expansion c. The visual Clearance and Access/Egress are covered above in chapters 18-102, and 18-108 respectively. r:\alb\98-177\dots\ctystds.doc Page 4 of 5 © O1:1 J 14. Landscaping: a. The existing landscaping was designed and installed per the 15%of gross area requirement. b. The 20% requirement of the net areas is less than the 15%of the gross area, which is the current condition. c. The actual area that is currently landscaped is over 19%of the gross land area. 15. Drainage: a. This application does not propose any modification to the existing grading. The existing shopping center is fully developed and the drainage patterns are already established. 16.Provision for the Handicapped: a. Seven handicapped parking stalls will be added to the existing Albertsons parcel, bringing the total to nine. See the Site Design Plan sheet A. b. The existing sidewalk ramps infront of the Albertsons store will remain. One new ramp will be added to the new handicapped access way. c. The new exit door from the expansion area will be equipped with a ramp, and handrail. 17. Signs: a. The existing signs are not part of this application. If Albertsons desires to change the signs they will apply for a separate permit. 18. Underlying Zone provisions apply to this application: a. The underlying zone provision, such as lot size, set backs, and land use are not proposed for revision with this application. r:\alb\98-177\docs\ctystds.doc Page 5 of 5 © O13 13 1:1 October 30, 1998 Architecture Mr. M.J. Roberts Associate Planner Planning City of Tigard Interiors 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR98-0018 Albertsons Expansion & Remodel 16200 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon MGA Job No. 98-177.11 Dear Mr. Roberts: We would like to revise the construction costs to cover just the area of the proposed expansion. The preliminary estimate of construction costs for this expansion, and adjacent shop demolition and reconstruction is One Million dollars($1,000,000). The overall project value or cost may be higher, but that higher value or cost will include work within the existing portion of the Albertsons store. We need to qualify the building area shown in this application to the degree that Kittleson and Associates compiled their report on information provided to them in January 1998. Since that time Albertsons has revised their proposed expansion to reflect a lower square footage increase. The Kittleson report states a 9,230 square foot increase, while the MGA narrative states a 7,380 square foot increase. The Kittleson report states a 2,640 square foot decrease of the shop building, while the MGA narrative states a 3,080 square foot decrease. The Kittleson reports states a net result to be 6,590 square feet, while the MGA narrative states a net result to be 4,300 square feet. The MGA narrative is based on the current information from Albertson. Sincerely Musil Group Architects. A/ Musil Group Architects Ed Craker Project Manager 9150 SW Ponee Court Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 • • • Tel 503 685 7350 Fox 503.682 3348 www mgai.corn El El October 7, 1 998 Architecture City of Tigard Planning Department Planning 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Interiors Tigard,Oregon 97223 • Major Modification to an Existing Development 18-120.070 This application is for an increase in the square footage of the Albertsons store located at 16200 SW Pacific Highway of 7,380 square feet, and a reduction of 3,080 square feet of the adjacent retail shops. This project is located in NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of section 15,and in the NW. 1/4 of the NE '/4 of section 15, T2S, R1 W, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon. Fact Sheet from section 18-120.070 The Director shall determine that a major modification will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1.An increase in dwelling unit density,or lot coverage for residential development. This is a commercial center and has no residential units. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This is a commercial center and has no residential units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.106: Parking requirements are based on the square footage,and type of business. The existing Albertsons is 43,130 square feet, which equates to 236 spaces. The addition of 7,380 square feet of food and beverage retail sales will require 37 additional spaces bringing the Albertsons total to 273 stalls. The current parking for the whole center has 58 spaces over the amount required by Code, see the summary on the site plan. These additional required spaces should be acceptable because they do not exceed the number of current extra parking spaces. Additionally Albertsons has a"Cross Access Agreement"for parking. Musil Group Architects 9150 S.W.Pioneer Court 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; Suite Wilsonville,OR 97070 The Albertsons Market is currently a Type III-N Sprinkled structure, and we will • • • not change that with this proposal. Tel: 503.685.7350 Fax: 503.682.3348 www.mgai.com 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The height of this building will not be increased by the new expansion. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; No modification of existing accessways or parking areas is proposed for this project. 7.An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 20 vehicles per day. Attachment#1 is a copy of the traffic study completed by Kittelson& Associates, dated August 18, 1998. This report states: "Operation of the signalized intersections of Highway 99W/SW Durham Road,and SW Durham Road/Summerfield Road/Albertson's access,will not be significantly affected by the proposed expansion.No mitigation will be required to accommodate the additional traffic volumes." 8.An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The existing Albertsons' building area is 43,130 square feet; the proposed expansion is 7,380 square feet. This addition will bring the total market size to 50,510 square feet. The expansion will be in an Easterly direction and will reduce the adjacent shop building by 3,080 square feet. This will result in a net increase of 4,300 square feet for the overall center. This expansion is within the 10 percent increase allowed by the Municipal Code. 9.A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space,which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduced the open space area by more than 10 percent. There is no assigned open space or common area for this project. 10.A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities: There are no recreational facilities connected to this project. b. Screening and/or landscaping provisions: Three planters will be lost at the Northeast corner the Albertsons store.A planting area that is the same area as those deleted planters will be added East of the new entry. 11.A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of B.1 through 10 above of this subsection. Additional conditions are as follows 1. Bike Racks-the City requirement is 1 bike rack for each 15 parking spaces. The total square footage of the remodeled Albertsons will be 50,510 square feet. This translates into parking for 18 bicycles. At present there is a rack near the West entrance,which will accommodate nine bicycles. We propose to add another nine opposite the East entrance. See the Proposed Site Plan. 2. Recycling activities as they relate to on-site storage: Albertsons recycles pop cans, bottles, and cardboard. These items are temporally stored inside the store until they are collected.No outside storage is used. 3. ADA parking: the handicapped parking for the entire site has been recently updated,and is reflected on the attached site plan. However the Albertsons parcel was not updated. We propose an increase to nine handicapped parking stalls in the Albertsons parcel. See the attached Proposed Site Plan for locations. 4. Storm Drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions: this is required only if the expansion is over 5,000 square feet in area,our expansion is 4.300 square feet. 5. Sewer Reimbursement Agreements: There is no Sewer Reimbursement agreement on this property. 6. Signs: The existing Albertsons building sign is to remain. If Albertsons' decides to change the sign they will apply for a separate permit. See elevation Sheet"B:" 7. Information Distribution: There is an A.L.T.A. survey included in this application. This plan contains all the information regarding Easements, Utilities, Right-of-ways, Drainage,etc.,as pertains to the existing Albertsons parcel. Impact Study This addition to the Albertsons store of 7,380 square feet of retail space will impact the following areas: 1. Transportation: The LOS level of service for the traffic signal at Durham Road and Summerfield Road changed for a level B to a level C.Kittelson&Associates has studied the traffic and circulation of the center,and issued a report dated August 18, 1998. In the report Kittelson measured the number of trips at the daily peak period of 4:45 to 5:45 PM, at each intersection. Their calculations indicated a less than one second increase in the waiting time for the signalized intersection at Durham Road and Summerfield Road, due to the increased trips. This is the main entry into the center opposite the Albertsons store. This increase is so minor from 14.4 seconds to 15.1 seconds, however it does change the Level of Service classification.. See attachment#1 2. The Bicycle circulation and access will not change with this expansion. The present bike paths,crosswalks and access will remain the same. We have added a bike rack per the Code requirements.. 3. The affect on the storm sewer drainage system will not change, because the total impervious area of the site will not change. 4. The Park System: This will not be affected by this expansion. 5. The Water and Sewer Systems: There will only be a small increase in the water and sewer usage in this remodel. There will be two public restrooms and a drinking fountain added. This is an increase of four fixture units,which when factored into the sewer and water demands of overall the center is insignificant. 6. Noise Impacts:No additional noise sources will be added through this addition. Public Meeting: On August 11, 1998 a public meeting was held at Richard M Brown Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham Road in Tigard. See the attachment#2,for a list of neighboring property owners notified of the meeting. The date of the mailing was July 28, 1998,see attachment#3, "Affidavit of Mailing."A sign was posted on the property on July 28, 1998, see the attachment#4"Affidavit of Posting Notice,"and a copy of the sign design,attachment#5. Both of the letters to Bit Holdings LTD were returned because the addressee was not at the posted address. James Brown and Randy Davison of MGA Architects conducted the meeting, on August 11th at 7:00PM to 8:30PM. The meeting was to present to the neighboring property owners the extent of the Albertsons remodel. One person showed up, see the attachment#6, "Sign in Sheet."His question was related to which direction the expansion was taking place. ATTACHMENTS K< KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 August 18, 1998 Project #: 3027 Jim Brown AUG 2 1998 MGA Architects 9150 SW Pioneer CT Suite T Wilsonville OR, 97070 RE: Tigard Town Square Albertson's INTRODUCTION Kittelson& Associates has been engaged by Albertson's Supermarkets to prepare a traffic impact study of the proposed expansion of the Albertson's Supermarket located in the Tigard Town Square at the intersection of SW Durham Street and Highway 99W,Tigard. The store location is shown in Figure 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development expansion involves the addition of 9,230 square feet of gross floor area (GFA)to the existing 43,130-square-footsupermarket. This 9,230-square-foot expansion includes 2,640 square feet of an existing retail space formerly occupied by a pet shop. It is understood that no new facilities will be added within the supermarket; rather, the expansion will increase aisle widths and thereby improve amenity to customers and staff. Notwithstanding, this analysis conservatively assumes that the additional floor space will generate additional traffic. For this analysis, a net increase of 6,590 square feet of supermarket space is considered to be added to the complex. The proposed expansion is planned to be completed before the end of this year(1998). EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing development is located on the southeast quadrant of the signalized intersection of Highway 99W/SW Durham Road. Access driveways are located on both SW Durham Road and Highway 99W. Two accesses to Durham Road are provided. The east most access is a signalized four-way intersection that ties in opposite Summerfield Road. A right-in, right-out access is provided on Durham Road central to the Highway 99W and Summerfield Road signals. Access to Highway 99W is provided via a right-in, right-out access south of the SW Durham Road intersec tion. FILE NAME:11:\PROJFILE\3027\REPORT13027REP3.WPD 1 Jim Brown - Project:3027 August 18, 1998 Page:3 Traffic counts were conducted at both of the signalized intersections on Wednesday July 29, 1998, between 4:00 and 6:00pm. The peak hour for the two intersections was determined to occur between 4:45 and 5:45pm. The existing turning movement traffic volumes are reported in Figure 2 for the two signalized intersections. The existing PM peak hour operation was assessed for the two signalized intersections using the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 1994) methodology. Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed by the transportation engineering profession to quantify the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. LOS is expressed as a letter grade that ranges from "A", indicating that motorists will experience little delay,to"F",indicating that they will experience significant traffic congestion and delay. For signalized intersections,LOS "D" is typically considered to be the minimum acceptable LOS grade. For unsignalized intersections, LOS "E" is considered to be the minimum acceptable grade. Signalized intersection results are reported in Table 1. The level of service analysis indicates that both signalized intersections currently operate within the accepted LOS"D"or better during the PM peak period. Table 1 - 1998 Existing Intersection Operation PM Peak 4:45-5:45pm Signalized Intersection v/c Average LOS Delay 99W/SW Durham Road 0.90 30.6 D SW Durham Road/Albertson's 0.57 14.4 B TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT Traffic Generation The traffic generation of the proposed 9,230 square feet gross floor area added to the supermarket and the traffic generation from the 6,590 square feet expansion is shown in Table 2 for purposes of comparison. It should be noted that the trip generation rate for a supermarket is used in this case since the expansion plan is for the Albertson's Supermarket. If the trip generation rate for a shopping center were used,the overall number of trips would be approximately 50%of those shown in Table 2. Based on observations at similar facilities, it is anticipated that approximately 40% of the expansion's total generation will be pass-by trips from the adjacent north-south and east-west roads, rather than new trips to the study area. Kittelson&Associates, inc. Portland, Oregon Jim Brown Project:3027 August 18, 1998 Page:5 Table 2—Proposed Development Expansion Generation Land Use Size(sq ft) ITE Code Daily Trips PM Peak Trips In Out Total Supermarket Expansion 9230 850 New Trips (60%) 620 34 32 66 Pass-by Trips (40%) 410 22 22 44 Total 9230 1030 56 54 110 Supermarket Expansion 6590 850 Net New Trips (60%) 440 23 23 46 Pass-by Trips (40%) 294 16 15 31 Total 6590 734 39 38 77 Distribution and Assignment of Site Generated Traffic Existing traffic counts and surrounding development patterns were considered in estimating the distribution of new trips assumed to be generated by the expansion. New development trips were assigned to/from the site to the surrounding road network via the existing access drives. Consideration was given to the most convenient routes as well as turning restrictions. The assignment of new site generated traffic and existing traffic is detailed in Figure 3. Pass-by trips to the development were assigned based on the percentages of vehicles currently passing on Highway 99W and SW Durham Road. Traffic Analysis The operation of the signalized intersections,under the total traffic flows,was again examined using 1994 Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Intersection Level of Service results are reported in Table 3. Table 3- 1998 With Expansion Intersection PM Peak 4:45- 5:45pm Signalized _ Intersection v/c Average LOS Delay 99W/SW Durham Road 0.91 31.6 D SW Durham Road/Albertson's 0.58 15.1 C The results indicate that the Highway 99W/Durham Road intersection will operate at 91% of capacity with the additional traffic generation. This is an increase of 1% over existing conditions. Level of Service remains unchanged from existing conditions at LOS D, while average delays at the Highway 99W/Durham Road intersection increase by one second from 30.6 seconds to 31.6 seconds with the additional generated traffic. Thus, the expansion will have a minimal impact on the operation of this intersection. The intersection of SW Durham Road/Summerfield Road/Albertson Access will experience an inc- Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Jim Brown Project:3027 August 18, 1998 Page: 7 rease of 1% in operating characteristic from 0.57 to 0.58 under the proposed expansion. Average delays will increase by just under 1 second from 14.4 seconds to 15.1 seconds. The resultant Level of Service changes from LOS B to C (this is because the threshold between LOS B and C is 15 seconds). Again, the expansion will have no measurable impact on this intersection. CONCLUSION The additional net new traffic conservatively calculated to be generated by the proposed supermarket net floor space expansion of 6,590 square feet of floor area represents a minor increase in traffic volumes on the surrounding road network. Operation of the signalized intersections of Highway 99W/SW Durham Road,and SW Durham Road/Summerville Road/Albertson's access, will not be significantly affected by the proposed expansion. No mitigation will be required to accommodate the additional traffic volumes. The net new traffic generated by the proposed 6,590-square-foot expansion of the Albertson's Supermarket expansion is calculated to be 734 driveway trips per day and 77 driveway trips during the peak hour. This would add up to 440 new trips to the roadway network on a daily basis and up to 46 new trips to the roadway network during the pm peak hour. The total new trips are on the conservative side since the expansion will not provide for services not offered by the existing supermarket. Thank you for providing Kittelson and Associates,Inc. with the opportunity to assist you with your development plan. Should you require any additional information or explanation,please contact me. Sincerely, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. ,4# Thomas H. Schwab, P.E. cc: Katherine Kirk, Albertson's Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) Q ti1. DURHAM RD TIGARDv ,TOWN SQUARE SITE VICINITY MAP TIGARD ALBERTSON'S EXPANSION I FIGURE J TIGARD, OREGON ,AUGUST 1998 3027F001 SI' NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) m0°a Ali 45-1 Ilits 25 675 .4--745 45-. or 15 1 in in o N N a N ■r .0 � n _O `O 5� ?so DURHAM RD Iit—600 c(4° TIGARDV ,TOWN SQUARE l EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES TIGARD ALBERTSON'S EXPANSION FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON AUGUST 1998 IIJ 3027F002 S' . O NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) o�n 0 rnaa Ai ls 45,' IlL 25 675—► 4-745 60-N 20 IN 1 in u7M-a Q' M F O O 4.5_Jr , A N)44 � k.2 j0 4$ es DURHAM RD Vim, ir'62p r TIGARD� ,TOWN// ID 1998 TRAFFIC WITH PROPOSED EXPANSION TIGARD ALBERTSON'S EXPANSION FIGURE a TIGARD, OREGON Z AUGUST 1998 J 3027F003 2S115BA 00100 2S110CD 00105 2S110DC 00500 Diane Elinor Allen UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK Eric B Kvernland 11570 SW Royal Villa Dr PO Box 8837 11445 SW Summerfield Dr Tigard,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97208 Tigard,OR 97224 2S115BA 00100 2S115BA 00500 2S115BA 00600 IBJ SCHRODER BANK Ruby E Samuel P Lindley Andrew A Ilg PO Box 20 16035 SW Pacific Hwy 10950 SW 5th St#150 Boise,ID 83726 Tigard,OR 97224 Beaverton,OR 97005 2S 110DC 00400 2S 110CD 00107 2S115BA 00101 DURHAM&99 ASSOCIATES LTD PTN NORTH SHORE CORP THE BIT HOLDINGS LTD PARTNERSHIP 227 W Trade St#400 PO Box 6400-Unit#2814 11540 SW Durham Rd Charlotte,NC 28202 Portland,OR 97228 Tigard,OR 97224 2S115BA 00103 2S 110DC 00400 BIT HOLDINGS LTD PARTNERSHIP DURHAM&99 ASSOCIATES LTD PTN 16200 SW Pacific Hwy 135 E 57th St#27 Tigard,OR 97224 New York,NY 10022 2 U" Y Ut !WNW COMMUNITY 1NU6U1[rI1[NT TEAMS WITS) NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeiler 11905 bdull SW 125th Court Clark G. Z Shore Drive Beverly Froude Craig Hopkins Jack 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 7430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-1068 (503) 524-0994 (503)639-2529 Trgard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith 11035 SW 135111 Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cl Mark F. Matron John Bennett' Tigard, W 97223 Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)524-6325 (503)524-4550 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)639-0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 1 1386 SW Ironwood Loo p 15120 SW 14 Pat 1st Avenue 8122 SW 2 SW Tigard, OR 97223 Ti Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 (503)524-5200 (503)590-1970/(503)624.8009 (503)620-7662 Tigard,OR 97223 Ed Howden Barbara Saltier Scott Russell 11829 SW Morning l till 1 1245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road Sue Rorman Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 11250 SW 82nd Avenue (503) 524-6040 (503)684-9303 (503)5 3.2 34 97056 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)543.2434 Bonne 8 Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Wooler 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue y Tigard,OR 97224 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard, OR 07224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 500.0481 (503) 590-0523 (503) 590-4297 Karl Swanson - 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-3369 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet,notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. WputtplllwlutlMNll now not 111411$7 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, JAMES R. BROWN , being duly sworn, depose and say that on JULY 28TH , 19 9g I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 16200 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at IT 0NVHLE, OR --1-1(3-A2.17) OR with postage prepaid thereon. -- Signature .. e presence o a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) ffi Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 09,0, day of 4 f , 19 y OFFICIAL SEAL PAULA J.STUDDARD t7 NOTARY PION NO.30 GON C IJ�% / `'�'•; COMMISSION NO.301727 �' MY COMMAS.SION EXPIRES CEC.16.2001 NOTARY PU:i C OF OREGON My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) I NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME:ALBERTSONS #565 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:PROPOSED EXPANS ION Name of Applicant/Owner: JAMES R. BROWN—MGA Address or General Location of Subject Property: 16 2 00 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): l AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, JAMES R . BROWN , do affirm that I (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed GROCERY STORE EXPANSION affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 16200 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY , and did on the 28 TH day of JULY 19 98 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at IN FRONT OF THE ALBERTSONS STORE +/- 500 ' EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 99W AND DURHAM ROAD. (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In t e presence • a • • ary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/'NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Z3r day of c 199S.v ,.�. OFFICIAL SEAL Si PAULA J.STUDDARD t—j- NOT ARY PUBLIC-OREGON T: COMMISSION N0.307727 NOTARY P 1C OF OR •N MY COMMISSION BORES CEC.16,2001 My Commission Expires: ,>>. iG cpC} / (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNA2vlE OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAMEALBERTSONS #565 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:PROPOSED EXPANS ION Name of Applicant/Owner. JAMES R. BROWN -MGA , Address or General Location of Subject Property: 16200 SW P A C T FIC I',IGIIWAY LSubject Property Tax MIap(s) and Lot#(s): I 4 n°:ognpauvn tyasiersutfposc-x 4'—O" MEETING NOTICE- -2° ALBERTSONS IS PROPOSING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR AN 1-I/2" EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING STORE PRIOR TO APPLYING TO THE CITY OF TIGARD FOR THE NECESSARY PERMITS, THE APPLICANTS WOULD LIKE TO in DISCUSS THE PROPOSAL WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS. YOU ARE INVITED TO O ATTEND A MEETING ON: TUESDAY, AUGUST 11th 7:00 PM RICHARD M. BROWN AUDITORIUM- 1-1/2" 8777 SW BURNHAM TIGARD, OR 97223 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL JIM BROWN AT MGA ARCHITECTS I AT (503) 685-7350. THIS IS AN INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON PREIJMINARY PLANS. THESE PLANS- I MAY BE ALTERED PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL TO THE CRY. PUBLIC NOTICE SIGN SCALE: I-I/2" = 1'-O" MG A ALBERTSONS EXPANSION STORE NUMBER 565 Architecture Planning Interiors DURHAM and GI4W 9150 SW Pioneer Court, Suite T Phone: (503) 685-7.350 TIGARD, OREGON Wilsonville, OR 97070 Pa= (603) 682-3348 5 • . r M A SIGN IN SHEET Public Meeting 08/11/98 8777 SW Burnham Street Date Tigard Oregon 97223 Architecture 7:00 PM Re: Planning Albertsons Store No. 565 Tigard, Oregon Interiors Name: Address: Phone No. .J o ss� �(- -Zti- cs-3) (20 -91/3 �(C�l l7D dI?Z 2`( Musil Group Architects,Inc. 9150 SW Pioneer Court Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 Tel:503.685.7350 Fax:503.682.3348 6 M A TRANSMITTAL Mr. M J. Roberts 98-177.11 To Project number City of Tigard 10/09/98 Company Date 13125 SW Ha11 Blvd. UPS Address Via Tigard, OR 972 A Transmitted Ed Craker 1' X Attached From Prints SDR98-0018 - Reproducibles Project Tracings Additional Information - Shop drawings Subject - Samples Copy of letter Specifications Copies Description - Others 1 Cost Estimate 1 Deed Architecture 1 Reduced Site Plan Planning 1 Copy of Pre-Application Checklist Interiors Comments Dear M.J.: Enclosed are the items you said needed to be included with the Site Development Application. If there are any other requirements please give me a call. Copies to Musil Group Architects,Inc. 9150 S.W.Pioneer Court Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 Tel:503.685.7350 Fax:503.682.3348 1:1 1:1 October 9, 1998 Architecture Mr. M.J. Roberts Associate Planner Planning City of Tigard Interiors 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR98-0018 Albertsons Remodel 16200 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Oregon MGA Job No. 98-177.11 Dear M.J.: The preliminary estimate of construction costs for this Albertsons remodel is $1,900,000.00,One Million,Nine Hundred Thousand dollars. This is very preliminary due to the fact that no drawings have been created,and the cost of labor and material varies with the economy. The estimated bid date is Spring 1999. Sincerely yours MGA,Archi •cts ,401" - • Ed Craker Project Manager Musil Group Architects 9150 S.W.Pioneer Court Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 • • ■ Tel: 503.685.7350 Fax: 503.682.3348 www.mgai.com 1.' ' K� rA$ T• -^MK-MSS.� 1•,.'" � 4 ' ,, ..*- f� 4• a' �•iNai✓-'I "4�A 'iZ rdial _V: -..:: � � -� i .. .' • Lp , 17-7r. .-i•--=' 1.'1.7 yam. 740QN172.KO *565-Tigard Tigard,OR r! 1/1691 o WARRANTY DEED 92088853 Wig co — KNOW ALL ?4Eri BY THESE ?RESENTS, that ALBERTSON's, INC., a 7,9 Delaware corporation rOrantor1),for the consideration hereinafter stated,to Grantor paid by IB,I SCHRODER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, a New York banking corporation, as p trustee under that certain Trust Agreement between the parties hereto dated as of the 1st _ W day of February, 1989 ('Grantee'), does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, that certain real property,with __. the tenements, hereditament, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, situated in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, the legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit'A' attached hereto and Lncorparanted herein, to have and to hold the --. ----- t same unto the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs,successors and assigns forever. ._. The conveyance hereby to IBJ Schroder Bank & Tnist Company is to it t solely in its capacity u Trustee of the Albertson's, Inc, Executive Pension Makeup Trust, • = c and MI Schroder Bank&Trust Company shall have no liability of any kind with respect to =i . . the premises conveyed hereby and all persons having any claim against the owner of the - -,;, premises conveyed hereby or any officer, director, employee or agent thereof with respect *1 to the premises conveyed hereby shall look only to the assets held by IBJ Schroder Bank& '_11i Trust Company, as Trustee of said Trust, for the payment or satisfaction thereof. The - Q.; i name 1W Schroder Bank&Trust Company as used herein, also shall include any successor [.";, .-; Trustee of said Trust. til Grantor hereby covenants to and with Grantee and Grantee's heirs, , '._-_ successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized In fee simple of the above-granted t_`; premises, free from all encumbrances except as set forth in Exhibit'B"attached hereto and ;,� I Incorporated herein, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the said premises " ,,,_ and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons • , T.• whomsoever, except those claiming under the abovc.described encumbrances. t--• = 7A a The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of '� `�'- dollars, is N -e However, rho actual consideration consists of or includes other ,_r---- , property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. `'i .Est ate. '%4'''': v: ig In construing this deed and where the context so requires,,the singular ; Y -•-:..:::�! includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions i�`.ty.': is 'l hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals, 4 ..7-'-=1 1 trf ti, '. - 7 y o ?z'1' &°71∎A / fo(tl Ci • +�T* 8i Z iii = t3v►se Y D g3-�G � � R: (-- 19 L . Mot- -- _c_. ..i .t�•1.• 0.. r:�•f`-.)`i P..l•• •�(rL' • ;•fl.''..'M v. a. v K :t. CV: r Y. • Sent By: WRG DESIGN INC. • 503 603 9x`44; Oct -8-98 8 : 51 ; �..�.�.�• T.uls ''-�'+Y�t i:.at'Jr, -\L'A.....•ii :.�•,c•►' '.'�'.�f Or• rftur UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED, ALL TAX STATEMENTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Albartsofl's, Inc, P.O. Boo 20, Boise, Idaho 83726; - Attn: Property Accounting Department. THIS INSRRUMEN1 WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY _u DESCRIBED TN MS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TIRE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. — IN WITNESS F, the Grantor has executed this instrument this day of 'Duerr err l7 V , and has caused its name to be signed and seal affixed by its officers, duly authorized thereto by order of Its Board of Directors. ALBEmSON'S,1NC., a Delaware corporation BY: Qi -.- J. ,� - - William H.Arnold z _: Vice President,Real Estate Law BY: _-- e 71A.___ ItiNkf. _ 2 U.r_— Sent By: WRG DESIGN INC. ; 503 603 9944; Oct -8-98 8 : 51 ; ' . I STATE OF IDAHO ) ) as: Cowiy of Ada ) •r � On this 116*' before tan W11'.Itm H. Artald�f rr,tai;.__.rip L p� ' 1-49� personally appeared fzi before and not �'a Riordan, who beg du}y awnrn each for c one for the other,did say that the former is the Yips President,Real Estate Law, and that the latter Is the Secretary of ALBERT SON'S,INC.,a Delaware corporation, -- and that the seal all zcd to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by at{ mity of its Board of Directors; and each of them acknowledged said Instrument to be 1 ••... }ta,v etary art and deed. -.._ ;�.' Ott}1, /j ,I-L.. L7 ___ .. ` `-r Notary - bhc for the Sta.. of F:-j,`. . My COMInasion Espirei: / / 43 J ? ,� ta:o■and d/drarsr --��. Aa+�oal.ran — -- p-p,gm m STATE OF 011.E0 ON ) I n ISO larlsatar Mut ) is 1D CM Calmly or ) --- __1 AttWtm Carpoats S l:maw I artily that the within instrument wiss rtvw rotated for reaord On the day of _ Grammes Musa mad Addr,�t .19�at o'clock IBT Se?uadar Beak Truer�apay TOR 'M',sod mulled m book/rnd jrotnma Oils iwuriota Me or as EL_ i tom.yak trr rocs �oR�t'!t7R tea/ 6�—strum _. Madan Arlo itC'roMara� N0 >�etordofDu -- daAf fir Mk bola I.Gado :aid Casoty. --- '1 l�r� iii Wit0US wy band and seal of County iirfgd ,�~. Albs agCOADD C 111211Zb�1 TOr a.,- '=- - Ktt c L dRtardao ~_= Anb�rliaaft,Lac. tV4mG `"',� V.t.=s_ P.O.V 20 `' 12 BY Deputy l) ;; ass lriea.ev s„c t 14.1• tt�.a, e V ','U.;. :1.;f ; i' 3 i f'• ' L Y •Sent - By : WRG DESIGN INC. ; 503 603 9944; Oct -8-98 8 : 52; -��_ y� v ` '' sit►'':^o. _ _---- y_.. _ • N EXHIBIT A Me �, Parcel, 2: • aS Beginning at chef/mercer Corner on the north line of Section 19. T Tovnehip 2 South, Range 1 Vest of the Willariette Meridian lo Washington • County. Oregon; Thee Porch 89'57'21" Rest alone the North line of ~~ nc said Section, 201.27 feet; Thence South 00'02'39" Fran 45.00 fees to - Ill.rCiftmimr. the TRUE Pow Of i1CZ@ILsc; Thence South 00'02'39" East 110.06 feet; • Thence South 89'57'41" vast 73.29 feet; Thence South 03'02'39' East 361.53 feet; Thence Korth 89'57'21" Last 7.00 feet; Thence South 00' 02'39" Ease 144.43 fest; Thence north 89'50'42" West 264.00 feat; Montt - North 00'02'39" Walt 144.12 fest; Thence North 89'57'21" East 7.00 feet; . ]bents Borth 40'02'39" West 131.33 feet; Thence south 89.37'21" West • 29.18 feat;' Thence North 00"02'34' Hest 362.38 feat to a poiat on the Southerly right-of-my lira of Durham Road; Thence South 69'30'00' East Mr gloms slid Southerly tight-of-eray !tae a distance of 30.17 feet; Thence Southeasterly along said right-of-,ray line on the.ara of a 322.46 foot radius curve to the lest (the chard of 'Mich bears South 79'46'20' Bast 186.33 fest) a distance of 187.34 feet; Thence Borth 19'57'22" Eaac parallel with the North line of said Section 15, a distance of 140.58 feet to the point of beginniog and containing 172,520 square feet of land, 'emem..• wore or less. - • C • :A-ate.. INEVLI ra . w.(1U LJLJ.I.Ur 1i4... . , -wt.) UUJ '+'+, UL. L - 0- b 0 . 3J1 — _.-_. . a .Y {.• �} L :=- .}^.Ir�;Z:7177 2, c�'r.. ''�f: ,/�'� :t. •.r Y�aL L.C,rCt^ e.r�'• 'E j't fi�w�nw su.�_.tom____ . if� _ -..� ... s® EXHIBIT 8 . 4 . An SADOMSnt oreatad by instrument, including the terns and I provisions thereof; • Rouordosl 1 August 30, 1974 in look 990, page 944 • favor of i Tuslatio-Vr•nklin, a joint venture of Tualatin Development Co. , Ina. , an or•gon corporation and Franklin Service Corporation, an Oregon - corporation miamasis ror I Sever pressure line ■.w _ ---- - - ---- - - 1■1 Me 5. i4 oIOnt for uki•ting public 0:111tlus in vac.►tyJ gLiii. L .icu., ■saKael reserved by Ordinance Ho. 75 39, and the Qondltions iesposed thereby. .. 6. 71n casement or*i sd by instrument, including the terns and _—__ provisions tbereoff - MUD R•eorded 1 June 13, 1987 as re• No. 87030098 = -� favor et s City of Tigard _ For s Sanitary Sayer —u �H7 . Declaration of Restrictions and grant of Basements, including ` � the tarma and provisions thereof, Dated I June S, 1907 Mg Recorded s June 12, 1987 as Fee No. 87030100 till 8•tv•en 1 Nestvood Corporation, ae. Oregon corporation and &iberteen's Ina. , a D•inraro corporation Jjj B . Common Ares Maintenance Agra•nent, including the terse and provisions thereof, a>mt rti! Dated s June 8, 1967 lift Recorded , June 12, 1987 as Tea no. 87030101 E#ii 8stvesn s Westwood Corporation, an Oregon corporation and e> sr Albertson' • ins. , a Delaware corporation esc+sse MINN 9 . Development Agreement, including the terse and URIII thereof, Recorded s June 13, 1957 as is Mo. 87030102 imgrad Between 1 wsetvood Corporation, in Oregon corporation and Ma Albertson'• 'no. , a Delaware corporation I MITCC:_ ! a •. :a ll S78TE OF CROW 1 =dill • Dowdy o!Vinahi gtee 8$ rims A ft . nil in; • ,.R . 3"d d AMA . . ..- C, � t iis peg* Doc 92088853 i-_; Roots 90513 53.00 .1 12/14/1992 10: S6137M mom • • • F � ' a � i rJ' R• t e� w�. •':1 ► w :. tA �.•L 7 l . } � YS � 1�' i �fh17 ATJoinii.. ' . • Stnt 9y: WRG DESIGN INC. ; 503 603 9944; Oct-8-98 8:49; Page 1 Post-it`Fax Note 7671 gate ►� e. 'Pages P R O r To From Washingto ��Y t#,r*IF*IF *************************-****** Co,Depr. �, Co 44¢L C * * * Phono it Phone* * OWNERSHIP I _ at * Fax# (D�,�, AQ Fax k * Reference Parcel 4:2S115B. * * Parcel Number :R0520314 TRSQ: 02S-01W-15 NW NE * * Owner : IBJ SCHRODER BANK & TRUST CO * * CoOwner * * Site Address : 11540 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD 97224 * * Mail Address :PO BOX 20 BOISE ID 83726 * * Telephone :Owner Tenant * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * * Transferred: 12/14/92 Loan Amount * * Document # : 88853 Lender * * Sale Price : Loan Type * * Deed Type :WARRANTY Interest Rate : * * % Owned : 100 Vesting Type :CORPORATION * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * - * * Mkt Land : $874, 560 Exempt Amount : * * Mkt Stct : $1, 788, 570 Exempt Type * * Other % Improved : 67 * * Mkt Total : $2 , 663 , 130 Levy Code : 02374 * * Assd Total : $2 , 327, 950 School Dist : TIGARD * * 97-98Taxes : $34, 919 . 48 * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * Map Grid: 655 C7 Class Code :S2 * * Census :Tract 308 . 02 Block 2 * * NbrhdCd : ZPHY MillRate : 15 . 0001 * * Sub/Plat : * * Land Use :2012 COM, IMPROVED * * Legal :ACRES 3 . 90, MH X# M00064310 * * * * * * --__ * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * Bedrooms Lon Acres : 3 . 90 Year Built : * * Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 169, 884 EffYearBlt : * * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * * Pool BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : * * Appliances : BsmLowSF Roof Shape : * * Dishwasher : Bldg SqFt : Roof Matl * * Hood Fan lstFlrSqFt : InteriorMat : * * Deck UpperFlSF : Paving Matl : * * Garage Type : Porch SqFt : Const Type : * * Garage SF Attic SqFt : Ext Finish : * * Deck SqFt : * ******************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 1 0 0 I k------- i 0201•04 RCAD i L i -....,.._,. . 1 . i ■ I . / I ,..- ,I. . ■ ... 1 --- . , . / •-....,.._., I / ' – 015706 110/7C SCOW--AR! — -.. / I / / 1 1 i • . t 1 , / 0 I • 1 ir -. _i____. . I \ ' 1 i, 1 .. C> i __ -71-_, Ti---7411..91 - 0 . . , •. ,, 17; • p G5... 0 1111, t*11 0 0 ' r • : 4. I ,,?, V. 7p, r , ,.: ,. . _ ...z...„;,:,..c.,,,,,....., . v,CINIT Y MAP NOT TO SC. 25. e • El ./<7. g§. T. T PP • c ■' 0 •V 0 hi Ilf? , . , i 1./' - I EY .._ d 1 P .7 e o • ii- - - -- ,0 , .,., 1 k • . g a ci / - Pr F.'-. i '" I i 1 1 ,,,k5 i •- / 0 .P 0 41,ty„ 1 0 1 ig 1 1 7 / , :: .1, , s cd" -,; DICK ORM RACK •A ..7 RELOCATED KE.111,7,. A i• lj 4 Pr! KR 5DE fr;.... ' • Ro. •0 0 S.A i, ;, MATES 700•0120_ 2,4 I I f.,.. 1 1 , , : \ • I iL;•.-.? , / EKTK 04-370/7■•PE..-M I.,STIRADLEKO S707C TAT i i ,,..--.111EITT WARM glE°R0REtl.7.4 \LK)000.50L200 ,,,.I — / R awc.con.KTIRS c23 INO•KECK . 'CAS KKR cDr 027.4/70 TAT. 1 1 pi 'Ites' QP ...• S. C007,,7 L.,Tarn 71/ I , 1§ \ MI 19 L '.. CA ICTER .M./.,,•• K...K.ii wia. :,,M,1 : 1 ! .7 I –71a7,4 I i ,,'\\ \\,, s I ; E, LJL 113 7 i iv.„\\:::.\\\\,„\,,,, \•,:\,, ,,,\\.:., \...,0 p/ /,. ./. LULU -- — , TENANT SUMMARY SITE SUMMARY , 0 ' 0 I SITE M. 21.72 IC 00003* . ra.ci, nmonmuct 5ecr :["=o V,\\ k\t.,,r,,,.:, _. L WALK TOM• 179.202 S., 700/072300 RA773.11.0.7•1110.047•4.24/1 0 ,,talietz-m_„,-,---, K 07/42 KT wp•10ETT RETK■ 21.4 ti: 1 lirt 0000 RECK. 502 STALLS - FAMIL1 li ...Ess EKAT MO.RETKI 27.463 tr. OR ,/kt MOO MONK. MS ITKLS 04,0E1 RI 10C STALLS■ / ‘\ \A\\A 11AREIHRLL3 67"Nttgenlii.121222, 41141.0204.1721K, vsi .f: 2 tf. lit 011100 RA00. A.51 SAKES/VW K WI MAIKK 2 5715•A /0 LOT.101210 VO . ATA:tai.770 :19(007R, 1.i. V. irt 0 /,;', , TKL WM DISICRA0.•C-0 010.4 COTAKROAT, 4 ---7#, ; xclATANOTT igfirgi IFP'::'sii ii: 17 P2.1 CONTACT LIST It .. 1 .,,..., iiit\\ N \\\ ,, c)\\ A „ 22 r . ,......,...„.T.........,- ,, ....-....„........., I ll: , im 1 og,,rak•,,,z-,...., li :Erc,57-4-7f.,., "‘F.L-- .. • . T4.1. TKO . I izi ;It Si. mew.0010 WM Por Qom 2115•6263 /KIROV 2104-7•7 'MKT&DAMS.' I MKT/wog. 1 , I i 1 r. 1\ . WI ........ ii "COVVEZP.1=1/0.‘""'"'ACCE I' 7 cAs srAtqw.0 v..c DADC.K.OS 12,77 13 K so_2.242 20..000." ';' 4 LIFI 11: ': 4;471 0.,. “"".'" tihi il: 4 T.- /0.,• NTIKITEE, N.C.,O.K.,ED CRKER KM.01■0■0*TRIKTECTS KV KST 0410-7330/A0 4031507.37. ......... P 7.f.a.TA .IT'olTumal Dot 500 inDAKEI 2,0 r/. . A 41 . \,\,\\\ \.\\, / TOIALV 1711.I.2 002 ITALIA SKIARK CERTER C DM..7.21.W.110 70 075.0 Coo7KKAL GROW.. /.... riY2 CERTERKKI 00K.PE 230 PARKING REQUIREMENTS LAKE KIK02.OKOON 11703.5 K i TM 30•67.2 7..61 310.54.2 . 7000 KO KVERKE ACK v200 SO.TALLM I/OR[WRY 2 ET0LOTIEs, =Ezra., woo 2.2. vox 1.2.22)2 t.2.22 Nom•1.Gt21 liellES2 CC AK ORMAK 2S1/KTIK.TS ra,SI.,07.,TOR IWRT 7 ETTROWES, alibi 1 RR...22.22.22 1/202 .2.102222-Kmowe,o ,a7.7`0 ZrLITTZ..fr,"'" WET nnt • 1 t...., G SITE , I SITE PLAN (PROPOSEDI IKET 1 SC.c•40,0- Pa WI/LK 7773 lam mama,.....-...rm.. • - - - r..t.....,-...11--,.. ,RATICSIOACES I 5 V'''6=I i i* A ALATTK IREA 10 ....■.=KIIIMININa. y Albertsons® October 2, 1998 City of Tigard Planning Department Tigard, Oregon Re: Albertson's#565- Tigard Tigard, Oregon Authorization To whom it may concern: Musil Group Architects, Inc., ("MGA") is assisting Albertson's with its remodel of the above- referenced store. This letter authorizes MGA to prepare, sign and file any and all paperwork necessary to secure the appropriate governmental and/or administrative agency approvals in connection with the Site Development Review Application for our pending remodel. Thank you. Very truly yours, ALBERTSON'S, INC. By: William H. Arnold Vice President, Real Estate Law 5651tr.doc ALBERTSON'S, INC./GENERAL OFFICES/250 PARKCENTER BLVD./BOX 20/BOISE, IDAHO 83726/208-395-6200 Albertson® STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) On this ' day of j,2(/'(__ , 99C, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared William H. Arnold, to me known to be the Vice President, Real Estate Law, of Albertson's, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that the said instrument is the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS MY HAND and official seal hereto affixed the day, month and year in this certificate first above written. My commission expires: /A;ydar). 4/1/0"/"?'-. Notary Public in and for the State of Idaho `,Hpuo4.,q� CLE1N4 Residing at Boise, Idaho ' 49. sr iy i +o, I 3 i 14( PUS '1 O.` 4%�•9,g ,ov�,•, ,, M � A FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Kath e irk 7)49101c- - ea < ru.reut r. cke-r k • 98-177.234 T y J7 hn. IS. Project number Albertsons Inc. ,i,t,,.(c. �c4- �t� 08/27/98 Date Company 1/ O01 -�`^ ' ^^^ C (208) 395-6442 Fax number Jim Brown From Check Request-Store No. 565, Tigard OR. Subject Architecture Planning 1 No.of pages including cover Interiors No Original to follow Comments ' ":1)18b Katherine, The application fee for Site Development Review for the above mentioned project i $1,600.00. Dle- Please forward a check for this amount to this office so that we may make application or is project. g The check should be made payable to "The City of Tigard". Thanks-JRB. 9/5 MI Copies to Musil Group Architects,Inc. 9150 SW Pioneer Court Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 Tel:503.685.7350 Fax:503.682.3348 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: cg772/ APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE J MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization ❑ C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed ❑ D) Applicant's statement � 4 • of Copies E) Filing Fee (Z1-- lcs040 • rr17x (t -QS SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(SUPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Site information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map eS 2. Site size & dimensions m� 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) ❑ 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ❑ 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ra' 10. Location of existing utilities and easements ovi 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LANG USE APPLICiTION 1 LIST PACE I OF 5 B) Site Developme,.. r'lan indicating: No. of Copies 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties 1' 2. Contour line intervals ❑ 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site 2/ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site ta' (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area ❑' (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation q/ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑'( (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 4' 8. The location areas to be landscaped Q' 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 2' 10. The location of mailboxes 0' 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements C) Grading_ Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site de elopment plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site a alysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The lo. ation and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) a eneral contour lines ❑ (b) S ope ratios ❑ (c) Sail stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) • .proximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A state ent from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantia • (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnica ineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm draina service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they ill be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLIUTION/UST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural C 'ings Indicating: No. of Copies The site develot. .ant plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Lands ape Plan Indicating: c a No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces 4/4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ID 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: P7 Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: t� H) Preiimina Partiti. /Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. dicatin:: No. of Copies 3 1 . The owner of the sue • •arce tz 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses 0 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level d 9. All slopes greater than 25% V 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 4V 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 4' 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑-1 LAND USE APPLICATION,LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 • I) Subdivision Prel iary Plat Map and Data Indicatin No. of Copies 1 . Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, ❑ engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water main - .sing ire . .nts ❑ (d) Major power - -p one transmission lines 0,000 volts or greater) ❑ A • of •urses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pat ways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary :nd storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, sho ing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finish-. grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distan- e beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of- ay(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation o storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water ourses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate I. dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pu •oses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inc es or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including th- location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a s atement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdiv ion improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppin: , wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot prac .cably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a 'arrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 4 OF 5 J) Solar Access Calculations: a K) Other Information No. of Copies a h Alog inbanyirnastersUkicl isLmst mav 23, 1995 LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PACE 5 OF 3 „.� CI1TOFTIGARD v . .so ,,#( kt PHEAPP[ICAT 0 r eONFERENC -on tes ali b orRSl161M r NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: STAFF AT PRE-APP.: v�%i, APP k141\ki \A 1 ( MCAT *il(- AtiekrYJKS Phone:I l E3 — GS5 — -- (k-E Phone: I 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: X2.1 -k-kv `�,°1 J t DLA- . TAX MAPS)/LOT#[S): _ 6 NECESSARY APPLICATION[S): - Vic— l Me(.7C-- i_u.t.) c c PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ..„ :i!- .: slv.( c;x&E egc„( t cc33 s� ta- -kt, — l t 5c.i . s.,1/ - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CtET.6Vici, QNMA I ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: J!1 CJ.T.AREA: C r,___—_1-0c FACIUTATOR: PHONE (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: — sq. ft. Average lot width: 'j ft. Maximum building height: /6 ft. /f . Setbacks: Front — ft. Side /ft. Rear Comer — ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: ' % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 19 %. [Helene Code Section 18. 0_,.. 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots creat as part of a partition . aVe—a minimum Of-lk of frontage or have a minimum 15- foot wid access easemen The D TH OF AL •TS SHALL NOT EXCEED 211 TIMES T VEflA IDTH, unless the parcel s less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Re er to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AnnOcatIon Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 NONistlil otlal LullcatIn/PlaiiIi1 Milos Section • SPECIAL SETBACKS > STREETS: 5/49 feet from the centerline of AUICkcNCA ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: 2,0 feet, along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Section and 18.96] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (y) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 PARKING AND ACCES e • . - D parking for this type of use: a_. t TL IA a- C" Z Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): C SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: > Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. > Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parking: > All parking areas shall PROVID PROPRIATELY LOCATELL>AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > CYCLE RACK` ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL I EVEL••' S. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access ,•'dth: Mini um pavement width: All dri ways and p k -a as, except for some fleet storage parking areas, • • - paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OFTIGARD Pre-A pfcatlon Conference Notes Page 2 01 11 Mrxaalr.rtla!rltllatl.r/na.u1 rnn:1.. Section WALKWAY R UIREMENTS W KWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE G OUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and i dustrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide onvenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways see. e •- .• tructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.1 .1 ill L ADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMER • OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXC +S OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with . loading space. The space size and loc.tion shall be as approved by the City Engineer. efer to Code Section 18.106.010-090) CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAI AINED BETW HREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and ro... •:• n ersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERIN. D SCREENING I order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND e . • REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE R VISUAL IMPACTS between ....cent developme ts, especially between different land uses, the ity requires landscaped • . er areas along certai site perimeters. Required buffer areas are •escribed by the Code erms of width. Buffer ar:as must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen tre-: and shrubs and must also a. ieve a balance between vertical a•• • tal •lantings. Sit: •.scuring screens or fences may .Iso be required; these are of advisable eve if n. -• .• -. by the Code. The required buffer . eas may only be occu • by vegetation, fen.es, utilities, and walkways. Additional information o required buffer materials and sizes m. be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as f• lows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FO • VEL• ENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVAT STREET as well as d • ays which are more t, an 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within th- • slic right-of-way or on privat: property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Str-- rees must have a minimum calipe of at least two (2) inches w•- -asured four (. fee ..ove grade. Street trees should be spa.ed 20 to 40 feet .t. depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. • • •- '• e . ion on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 M 11 NSMaslb■tl■I A•.lk■tl.■/PlautH.MsI.■S•ctlo■ SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigar• • "G idelines for Sign Permits" h.•..ut is a -ilable upon request. Additional sign area or -'• t beyon• Code standards ma •e permitted if the sign proposal is review-. - of a development review applicatio •lternatively, a Sig Code Exception a.• .-- ion may be file for review before ie Hearin. 8 ficer. (Refer to ; , • . Hon 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRA)NAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. St. ""i atte . to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- ap lication conference ..sed on available 'nformation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely icl ntify sensitive . ds areas and their bi ndaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas eetinq the • initions of sensitive lands ust be clearly indicated on plans—submitted with the .evelo. - t a.•lication. C 18.84 also provides regulations for he use, prote 's , or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PR• 1B r ITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES e ' , prior to issuance if a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addre es the approval standards of the Tigard Community Dev ent Code S-ction 18.84.040 s. The report shall be based upo• field exploration and -stigation and shall ' clude spe ' ' recommendations for achieving •e requirem-• of 18.84.040.B.2 and 8.84.04'.:.3. UNIFIED S RAGE AGENCY NSA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design C iteria: The VE ETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from t e defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agen y or City to reduce the width of a ••-'. o - corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City o reduce the width of a porti.- • the vegetate• corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be irected to an area of th- vegetated corridor at is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum all wable encroachmen all be 15 feet, exceet as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 p rcent of the lengt • the vegetated corridor ithin the development or project site can be less than 5 feet in width. any case, the average w':th of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 f et. estfictiOns in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construc on activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, •r other activities shall be permitted which ootf �iw se ract from the water quality protection provid:d by the vegetated corridor, except . - owed below: > A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE -ATH, NOT EXCEEDING : . T IN WIDTH. If the wal ay or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must e - widened by the width to the p . A paved or gravel walkway or bike oath may not • • constructed closer than 10 feet fr m the boundary of the sensitive area, unle . 24 . ed by the Agency or City. Walkways nd bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Appicatlon Conference Notes Page 4 et11 NOM-tealdeotlal lollatl..Rlao•leo IM:Is.Settles > WATER QUALITY t-NCILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location 15f Vegetated Corriclo-r:---- IN ANY,RESIDENTI VELOPMENT W ICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ow ip, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be con fined in a separate tract, anti-shah not be a part of any parcel to be sed for the constructio welling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chant 3,Design for WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprhensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING ( GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and t.,, " . e arbor's p • ' ions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These • • isions require that "signi ant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and prote -.. The Tualatin River, which is als• a "fish-bearing stream," has an average ., annual flow • ore than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STR a MS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic eet per second (cfs). > Major streams in Tigard include FANNO ' REEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEK' AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING S "EAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include S mer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributa,es of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZO ALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, 00R THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is t e same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). > The standard TUALATIN RI ER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. > The MAJOR STREAMS RIPAR :N SETBACK IS 50 FEET, u o i iied in accordance with this chapter. > ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.810) CITY()FT16ABD Pre-Appgcatlon Conference Notes Page 5 sill 11011-lullntlal4/IkitlnRlanl.i(Mills S.ctl.i Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of st ctures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better pr•tection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or e hancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. li•ibili for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. 0 BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPA- s .CK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was ••stantially distu .-d at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must • based on the Veget.tion Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all e he following: ➢ Naf ce plant species currently cover less han 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree canopy currently covers less an 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the • -site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed cont ary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 60-year flood•I.••• The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.85.100] TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A "EE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a c:rtified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a ►evelopment application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save_oxisting--tr-es or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must f e replacement • idelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following sta s: Retainage of less than 25% of existin• trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a –mitigation program according to Section 8.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; * Retainage of from 25 to 50% of exist' g trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed •e mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of ex' ting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be itigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75% or greater of :xisting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are propo.ed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standar•s and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after constructio n. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD •F ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEV • NT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventori:• as part of the tree plan above .•: I ill be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 —� CITY OF T1GAED Pre-ApppcatIon Conference Notes Page 6 N 11 MAN-A•slUatlalA•jllcatl•erual•1 IMsln Section MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: > A/replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. > It[ a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: > The number of replacement tr required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree r ved or damaged, by the :liper size of the largest reasonably available replacem rees. If this number of trees ca not be viably located on the subject • ••e , th- • ector may require one (1) or more repl. ement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, wit the consent of the owner, private property. > The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a anner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D • this section, a party ••—y,—with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City fo its costs in • - arming such tree eptacemet. z= Mete to Code Section 18.150.070 WI NARRATIVE The APP CANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable appro standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to sider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.321 CODE SECTIONS _ 18.80 _ 18.92 _ 18.102 18.116 18.150 18.84 _ 18.96 18.106 2 18.120 18.160 ____18,85 — 18.98 _ 18.108 _ 18.130 18.162 18.88 - 18.100 18.114 18.134 18.164 IMPACT STUDY As art of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to CLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Pape 1 d 10 11111-lesIle.tlal LIp1Icitl.a/T1aidi1 RMslol S•ctlo■ WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Rau to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLI T SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE APPR ATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE ( -________SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RES ;VAT1ON PRI•R TO S : I NG A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, apt icant's - e re.uiret to complete and file a s ef ision p - naming request with the Washington C•unty - rveyor's • f ice in order to of . n approvaVrese ation for any subdivi Atpli : ions will not •e accepted a omplete until the City receives the f confirmation of approval from the Cou ty of the division Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's r ee: 503-648-8884) BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED.) ECYCLING : :• !cant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.1161 CITY OF T CARD Pre-dppicatlon Conference Notes Page i II11 NSNa.sIdestlaI ktllcatloaRlsaului Milos Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8W' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF11GARO Pre-AppUcatlon Conference Notes Page 9 of 11 1101141a:liaa lal a ppIlceln/PIuatag Mils■Sactlaa • PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: , CS _ L CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: [5031639-4171 FAX: [503)684-7297 E-MAIL: (staff's first name)@cUlgard.or.us LUgli atrAisasurslinan-c.si (Fiuluulsl Ssct let ats$tsrslanspr-cjsal Updated: 261ta1F91 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 of 11 111111-lbsllsttlal Appllcatlu/Plaulse DMsln Section i7[R Y{;.fi .i`° �" .I 1 b' r jt" A L >' t� j �"' 9 e' y. r a°: t rtu=ti k.7 ' � �y�T'�.1.'a+1 6 t� � tl,`tT P E= PLI.0 ON C i RENO MWC�sa.s '4 k. 3 t" 4f kd.$y "'r� Sr `t `>�+ sZ +§ Ain t-t ° & '-4K .034 ��rz "1",=;*:" r a a f �� � � � � EN EERING SECT � C r e b rd, regon *A a r i ) i.Y thf 4"r.�#' t '77xr � ? S'±; 4. .\04„.x,5,4-, '7�' +. caY:. fa r a. U1 4 I � • :, -MV,."`r .1: . ; l�r�` ,J` "" ,y ° ° 14 ..:? `✓ c� i st? '? � .' � F?F4?+ s jv PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from cente .• ( ) to fee om centerline. (4 to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along ( ) '. street improvements will be necessa -long ( ) Street`i provements on shall include feet o f p avement from centerlirie, plus the installation of curb an. 'utters, storm sew-rs, undergr. nd placement of utility wire (a fee may be collected if de -rmined appropriate b the Engin:ering Department), a five-foot ide sidewalk (sidewalks • .y be required to be widhr on uteri. s or major collector streets, or in the Central Business •istrict), necessary street si•ns and t affic control devices, streetlights, a a two year stree ghting fee. ( ) Street improvem nts on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus th • . ation of curb and gutters, storm sewers underground placement of CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page l of 5 Eipba•tfap Iaparoaaat Section utility wires (a fee / be collected if determined appro, .te by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal •i e (TM► requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be pl2a ed undergrou • or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergroun•irig can be paid. Thi equirement is valid even the utility lines are on the opposi - side of the street from th- ite. If the fee in-lieu is pro •osed, it is equal to $ 27. . per lineal foot of street front. •e that contains the ove ead lines. There are exis • g overhead ility lines which run adjacent to this site along S ■ . P '•r to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, o pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently pra ical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may specified which requires the property • , er(• to execute a non-remonstra . - .greement which ives the property owner's right to - onstrate :gainst the formation of a •cal improvement district. the following street improvem- - s may be eligibl: for such an agreeme• : (1.) (2.) -destrianways/bikeways: • Sanitary Sewers: E is Ate- 56¢-vc--D caPp,i,.,E.--c- -vs. 6-rit.x,f a,l _5%—. The earest sanitary ry sewer lin- to this o p s a(n) h line c 1 is located in Ill . The • ••o -d deve • 'me t mu be onn ct d to p lic-sanita sew- . It is the •evel. .er's re •onsi•• yto Water Supply: The ,a l p Water District - Phone:(503) ( 9 4111 provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appgcatlon Conference Notes Page 2 015 Engineering U.nrm•.l S.ctl.. • Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. C mac(" -b `E�u STi 1E 5 -r, Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( trPayment of the fee in-lieu. (° ► t F CRY of TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 015 Eopineerleg Deportment Sectloo TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Ea0laaartuf lepartmaof Sect laa Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: /t6 ENG EERING DEPARTM NT STAFF Phone: (503)639-4111 Fax: [503]684-1297 h\pattyknasters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 18-Nov-97 CffY OF T1GAR0 Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Eaglessrlo0 Department Sectlo• --1‘)/4-- `t b - G tit. . , CITY OF TI 4 0` '., , ,:, !,.1 A ”..,. P ' .��APPLICLON CONFERENCE ' TS TRAM (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(6)Mon 1 Shaping A Better Community _ NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: • STAFF AT PRE-APP.: ►jlisl APPL : K 4 cVAcsiNl c kkCiA) 1 AdekryiNIS Phone:[ I c3 — CSS - � (.1/4-g Phone: [ I PRcr r : 01 b,G)r-bon's.L----cpaii5itn PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 5c CoR.A.Aae ktv..M 1,1■Nr f 1 ,.,124' . TAX MAP(SI/LOT AM: .,S1 l5I ? (PILO r 1 NECESSARY APPLICATIONISI: 'cZ-- Vic--VG {\n Revved■/ /10Z-U. K.A. Z ot-- li 4 1S.( 1_04-,. TL TI I PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: E, -Z- i,STi+■iCi sic -tea ..- 4-- 0.3 ta- -h, -- c Si/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ( CCy.MA iAL ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C_- C� C.I.T.AREA: SJ,ICIA FACILITATOR: PHONE: 1503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average lot width: j ft. Maximum building height:ft. / / Setbacks: Front ft. Side /ft. Rear Corner / ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: ',' % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 19 %. (Refer to Code Section 18. ,2, ) ►1DDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition aVe-a minimum • feet of frontage or have a minimum 15- foot wide;access easemen The DEPTH OF ALL. SOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2 TIMES T' ' ' ' C IDTH, unless the parcel I's less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Meier to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots) CITY OF TISARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 01 10 NON-I•sll•.tlhI AarllaleUPlauleo DMslou S•ctloo SPECIAL SETBACKS /• STREETS: 5/64; feet from the centerline of L ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from > LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: 2-C) feet, along the site's boundary. • FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Section and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will be at least half (ill) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. _ [Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) PARKING AND ACCES D parking for this type of use: O 5 (1- Z c-1b6 ' Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: > Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. > Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE- (APPROPRIATELY LOCATEI_AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICY161..E RACK` ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EVEL•'' S. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: _--Minimum access 'dth: . Minimum pavement width: All dri ways and parki except for some fleet storage parking areas, paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 01 10 NON-lszIdsnlal ydlleItlhi/Tula!IMsII1 Sscuei WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS W KWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE G OUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and i dustrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide onvenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways se-. . •- •• tructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.11 :.10] LADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMER - OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXC S OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with . loading space. The space size and loc.tion shall be as approved by the City Engineer. efer to Code Section 18.106.070-0901 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAI AINED BETW ' HREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and ro.•, ::• ntersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Section 18.102] BUFFERIN. AND SCREENING I order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND ■ €F1 REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE f•R VISUAL IMPACTS between ..'-cent developme ts, especially between different land uses, the ity requires landscaped .. er areas along certai site perimeters. Required buffer areas are •escribed by the Code terms of width. Buffer ar:as must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen tre-: and shrubs and must also a• ieve a balance between vertical a•• -: • • tal •lantings. Sit- •.scuring screens or fences may .:lso be required; these are of -- advisable eve if no -. ,• -d by the Code. The required buffer . eas may only be occu•'-• by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information o required buffer . - . materials and sizes m. be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as f• lows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: . LANDSCAPING _ STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR--ALL-DEVEL ENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVAT STREET as well as driveways which are more t an 100 feet in length. Street trees must be plat d either within the--public right-of-way or on privat property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way b undary. Str frees must have a minimum calipe of at least two (2) inches we-- -asured four ( fee ove grade. Street trees should be spa ed 20 to 40 feet ..- depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. 'e • . ion on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.10 0,18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 ef 11 11011-.oslleuUel lleellcstlee/Pisoolo.OMsion SecUoo SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigar. • "G idelines for Sign Permits" h.••.ut is a -ilable upon request. Additional sign area or -'. t beyon�� Code standards ma •e permitted if the sign proposal is review-. as of a development review applicatio A Iternatively, a Sig Code Exception a•. .-- on may be file for review before e Hearin. • ficer. [Refer to I . . tion 18.114] SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. St. ""i atte . to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- ap lication conference sed on available 'nformation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely icj ntify sensitive - ds areas, and their b ndaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas eetinq the . tuitions of sensitive lands ust be clearly indicated on planis—subritted with the sevelo. - t application. C-apter 18.84 also provides regulations for he use, prote ' , or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PR IBIT ITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES e ' , prior to issuance f a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addre es the approval standards ,of the Tigard Community Dev- •a ent Code Section 18.84.040 The report shall be based uport field exploration and . -stigation and shall ' clude spe ' ' recommendations for achieving •e requirem-• of 18.84.040.B.2 and 8.84.040.:.3. UNIFIED S RAGE AGENCY[USAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design C iteria: The VE ETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from t e defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of o corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a porti n-cf the vegetate corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be irected to an area of th egetated corridor at is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum all wable encroachment all be 15 feet, exceIt as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 p rcent of the lengt . the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 5 feet in width. any case, the average w)h of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. ions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construc on activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, •r other activities shall be permitted which otherwise Bract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except - - owed below: F A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE •ATH, NOT EXCEEDING : " T IN WIDTH. If the wal ay or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must ■ - widened by the width to the p . A paved or gravel walkway or bike .ath may n�� constructed closer than 10 feet fr m the boundary of the sensitive area, unle - :a •ved by the Agency or City. Walkways nd bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 11 NON-ls Id•otlaI Appllcatl../Pta..ug OMsloo Section • WATER QUALITY F. _,ILITIES may encroach into the vege. ,d corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location f Vegetated Corricier��~` IN ANY /of VELOPMENT W` ICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ow ip, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and•-shall not be a part of any parcel to be sed for the construction of a dwelling unit. Meier to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chant 3,Design for WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance 'fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: / The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING / GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and t "safe'harbor'provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These_ Islons require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and prote .---The Tualatin River, which is alsd a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow ore than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STR 'MS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic eet per second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard include FANNO ' REEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEK' AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING S r"EAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include S mer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributa,es of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZO ALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, faR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is t e same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RI ER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPAR :N SETBACK IS 50 FEET tess--rfl d in accordance with this chapter. _ --' • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffed' is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.0101 CITY OF MAAHO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 11 NON-Issidootlal l4eeleetlee/Pleeole0 OMsloe Section Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of striu ctures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. li.ibili for Ri.arian Setback in Disturbed Areas. 0 BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPA- TBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was .•.stantially distu •-d at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must •- based on the Veget.tion Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all e he following: > N_at.,e plant species currently cover less han 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree canopy currently covers less an 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the • -site riparian setback area for the last five years; > That vegetation was not removed cont ary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; _ > That there will be no infringement into the S0-year flood•).'•• - • !-_ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.85100) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS AEE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a c rtified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a evelopment application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: > Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; > Identification of a program to save_oxisting trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must f die replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following sta s: b Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 8.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; b Retainage of from 25 to 50% of exist g trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed •e mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; * Retainage of from 50 to 75% of ex' ting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be itigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; b Retainage of 75% or greater of :xisting trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; > Identification of all trees which are propo.ed to be removed; and > A protection program defining standar.s and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD SF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVE e' NT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventori.. as part of the tree plan above -•. Ill be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.025] CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 01 11 NON-1s IdsatlalAaalication/Plaaalaa Division Section MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A/replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement tr required shall be 'determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree ved or damaged, by the :liper size of the largest reasonably available replacementirees. If this number of trees ca not be viably located on the subject • ••erty, tie ctor may require one (1) or more repl. ement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, wit the consent of the owner, private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a anner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D .' this section, a party ,e- •, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City fo its costs in •= - arming such tree .replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(D) NARRATIVE The APP CANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable appro standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to Sider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Section 18.321 CODE SECTIONS _ 18.80 _ 18.92 _ 18.102 J 18.116 18.150 — 18.84 _ 18.96 18.106 18.120 18.160 885 _ 18.98 _ 18.108 _ 18.130 18.162 18.100 . 18.114 _ 18.134 18.164 2 (IMPACT STUDY As art of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to CLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501 CITY OF TIGABD Pre-Application Conference Notes Panels!10 111111-#esldeeUel d.Nlleetln/pleoeley Misled Saabs WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLI T SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE — APPR ATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE OMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RES VATION PRI t R TO S : - I NG A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, apt icant's - e reouireo to complete and file a subdivision p naming request with the Washington County - rveyor's • fice in order to oin approvaVrese ation for any subdivi Aopli - ions will not •e accepted aa-tOmplete until the City receives the f confirmation of approval from the Cou ty of the_SutY'clivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's I e: 503-648-8884) BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED.) [CYCLING • (cant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) CITY OF TIGAmD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 10 NON-i•sld•otlotiMillcotloo/Planolo0 Melon Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMEh.... -14 1/ -?1 p 770 �O PJ ) l/J c i tdcn 4--cl )7L , f'�� � /1- . E- Ji?,-e vi o f C-• /I % 7 d/2 FA' ? o r z , 422 e' "4 4 /-"or PROCEDURE 7K Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8W' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF T1GARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 9 WI 11011-RosIdsIt1ii ADDlicotla./PloofIol Division Section PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It Is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: �� C'�(°�3a CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE 15031639-4171 FAX [5031684-7297 E-MAIL (staff's first name)©cl.tigard.or.us b:Ueile 1aatlyvusters V rear-o.a st IEoeloeerlei Sutler aasterslpreapp-c.engi Updated: 26-May-98 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Appllcatlon Conference Notes Page 10 of 10 NOM Ieal�eetlalA�/Iltatlee/►Iaapin0 DMsioe Section F PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q CommunityD Oregon elopment Shaping A Better Community 2_ I l'� &a 4t a� PUBLIC FACILITIES AL-435------T s A,,, , The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1 .) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from cente line. ( ) to feet om centerline. (-) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along . ( ) street improvements will be necessa y-along . ( ) Stre provements on / include , feet of pavement from centerli , plus the installation of curb an fitters, storm sew rs, underground placement of utility wire(a fee may be collected if determined appropriate b the Engineering Department), a five-foot vide sidewalk (sidewalks rrray be required to be widelr on arterials or major collector streets, or in\he Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, arkd a two year streetlighting fee. / ( ) Street improvem nts on shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus thb,instatlation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section utility wires (a fee r be collected if determined approi- by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sideYYalk (sidewalks may be required to L_ .eider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code--(111 ),M requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergroundir can be paid. Thi equirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the ite. If the fee in-lieu is pr osed, it is equal to $ 27. 0 per lineal foot of street front e that contains the ove ead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along S . Prior to 7 , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, o pay the fee in-lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a f�al improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1 .) • (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: \ / \ \_____________ • / Sanitary Sewers: C -cE is A` 5s2✓e—D cApN,.,&----c- { .7-i,ucl c,4 -sv.r . The nearest sanitary sewer e to this prope y 's a(n) e inch line which is located in /n . The pry.0 -d deve .pment must be onn ctf d to lic sanita sewer. It is the develo er's re onsi ility to or- p � Y /,i Water Supply: The u,o2•p Water District - Phone:(503) G:;`1-'11-71 provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Engineering Department Section Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Bircnill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. Cott -6 "er4 ST UJ-St7` Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( •j1Payment of the fee in-lieu. (�,i, t F Al)DI N.� POIDIA _ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section • • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171 , ext. 304. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section Site Improvement t emit (SIT). This permit is genera , issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ' - . 4f --1((Iqb ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [503)684-7297 h:\patty\ma sters\preapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r mst) 18-Nov-97 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST ,�%L�'�II� CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff:_ ktr Date: 7/2-(12, fl APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENTS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Q TS INCLUDE ✓ MARKED ITEMS�I A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement 0 44cofCopiesJS L la- lm w )r (1 US JS Zt u �- It SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS , A) Site Information showin No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map / 2. Site size & dimensions Li 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds O 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: 0 (a) Floodplain areas 0 (b) Slopes in excess of 25% 0 (c) Unstable ground 0 0 (d) Areas with high seasonal water table (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential O (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils o 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive ❑ Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings p ground 0 (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from round level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND USE APPLICATION,LIST PACE 1 OF 3 B) Site Developmen in Indicating: No. of Copies i►� 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties rz!/ 2. Contour line intervals ❑ 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site m' (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site Q% (b) Parking and circulation areas o' (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas tt, (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site 2' (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 12( 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions I 7. Sanitary sewer facilities q/ 8. The location areas to be landscaped r3 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements m� C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site a alysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The lo. ation and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) II eneral contour lines ❑ (b) S ope ratios ❑ (c) Sail stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) • •proximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A state ent from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantia (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnica el ngineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ \- LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 2 OF 3 D) Architectural Dra+•';ngs Indicating: • No. of Copies AO.. The site developr : plan proposal shall include: 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure ///,, E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies C" The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces o 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials a1 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions (b) Erosion control measures that will be used o 0 F) Sign Drawings: Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preliminary Partiti. /Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. dicatin:: No. of Copies 1. The owner of the su• - cartel- 2. The owner's authorized agent 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date e( 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries I 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses -� 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ©; 9. All slopes greater than 25% V 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements V 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip q/ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑J LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision Prelin' -Iry Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water main '• - •.ing fire-hy• .nts ❑ (d) Major power - -p one transmission lines 0,000 volts or greater) ❑ . - •u rses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pat ways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary :nd storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribution system, sho ing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finish •d grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distan, e beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of- ay(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation o storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water ourses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate I.• dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pu •oses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inc es or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including th - location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a s atement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdiv sion improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppin: , wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot prac 'cably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a 'arrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION.UST PACE 4 OF 3 j) Solar Access Calculations: 0 K) Other Information No. of Copies 0. h:Uog in\patty\rnastersUtic l is t.ms t may 23.1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PACE 5 OF 5 El El June 25, 1997 City of Tigard Architecture Community Development Dept. Planning 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Interiors Tigard,OR 97223 RE: Albertsons-16200 S.W.Pacific Hwy-Tigard Site Development Review Chp. 18.120 MGA Job#97-5193.23 To whom it may concern, The following is a brief narrative of the proposed modification to the existing Albertsons store located at the southeast corner of Highway 99W and Durham Road. The store is to be enlarged by expanding the east wall approximately 44 feet. See the enclosed site plan. The adjacent shop building space (Animal House) will be demolished to accommodate the increased size of the Albertsons building. Animal House will be relocated within this same center under separate reviews and approvals. The intent is to keep the exterior design the same, and modify only the entry locations on the North side. The existing East exit,near the rear of the store,will shift with the modification. At present, the site has more parking than what is currently required by the current Tigard Municipal Code. Consequently, the loss of two stalls will not be in violation of the aforementioned code, Chapter 18.106. The proposed modification will not impact the drive entries or any truck loading activities. The landscaping will be changed only by the loss of one sidewalk planter, the one in front of the existing pet store. The current landscape area exceeds the 15%requirement, as stated in the Tigard Municipal code Chapter 18.100. Please accept this as our Pre-Application Conference narrative. We look forward to reviewing this modification with you at the upcoming conference. Sincerely MGA Ed Craker cc.: Katherine Kirk/Albertsons,Boise Musil Group Architects Paul Owen/Albertsons, Boise 9150 S.W.Pioneer Court File Suite T Wilsonville,OR 97070 • • • Tel: 503.685.7350 r:\alb\97-5193\docs\lt-city.rev Fax: 503.682.3348 www.mgai.com / — — EXISTING TVAFFIC mil DURHAM ROAD — — — — — — — GENERAL NOTES i 0 : r , ! ae�' _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 QRAWN WITH OUT BENEFIT OF SURVEY ! I �' �•. •• •• Z•�•• •• •• •ice•• •• •• ••�•• / 1T4 EXISTING NATURAL DOCK % •! 0 J I ��I ` I Ia i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I 0 I 26 Q •— • S (air / / / / "° fib ♦ • L .„ EGEND % - ---- j; Ha o e _ TRASH a - ENCLDS191E PROPERTY LINE 1" Cr=11•11MJ•111•11111ill•M•1111111••=111•■••12 .67.1 IV - p . P _ , , „ PARCEL LINE / % 1 • • CS / / • / • I / / / ' . • / © 0 ®_ 0 0 0 /4 0 0 ,;� m © 0 m Cr =S "— 1• i .t. .t■ v .s■ 4. i v �. 4. � 4 — a• iI t2-O IC AeERTSO S PARCEL 1.9E (PROPOSED) • :5i �� O c raTESwtd+osa ��,H� I I lol "�"� — 1 f° Li 1 I J / 0 EXPANSION AREA— 1 1 - l o OEXISTING SHOP SHO we Iii Ait6 / k ,l b O • O TO F \ 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 H ASH \ I • 4 12 MECHANICAL �\ PAYLESS DRUG 1 Di / . TO OE RELOCATED e\ • _ _ ID8'i-AID) I \����� --- '� co EXR LHOP8LIJI4G ARfw a I DESIGN k CONSTRUCTION I f 250 PARKCENTER BLVD. CD SHOP SUILDNO BOSE,IDAHO 83726 /),�\ , = i / ' GAS liETER (208)385-6200 U ' \ \tt�J\\\�\\�\ 2 LOA�� I �I� A. TS , PROJECT i/' -� J� I CO RIMS METER /Cl i7C Pte) • \\\\\\\\\ \\\ iELY Q TM/Yea/ER i \� 1 ) m DELIVERY IMP I ' 16200 i [3) 20 !- ------------ ------------------------1--------------------------------- ------ j i S.W. PACIFIC • a\\\\\\\��\\� I � • I TIGARD HIGHWAY/- - ]ENANT SUMMARY SITE SUMMARY OREGON®Tj • i \\D\ i M TENANT:xAOE srtE aREA n7e Ac.(948 839 SS.) O \\\� AN D9G ARE:N 948.83 sF. ! 1 PETITE DAY CAFE (PRE-SCHOOL) (1.71D S.F.SF. 1S STALLS LMD/BULDNO RATIO) 046.530/161.043 • 4.24/1 • • 2 /l/��►0�04�(5 ETC.(004.PET NO 1,317 S.F. 4 STALLS P REQUIRED. 607 srjs / pLIcr 1 °� ' 4 MYI.ESS DRUG (OES�.IETALOEL RETAIL) �,•�4660 SF. 60 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED. 8315TNiS (HCUAES n H/C STALLS) 8 LOU�Y'S RETNa 1{050 S.F. 4 STALLS PARKING RATIO. 460 9PACE511000 SF. 2 S.F. 4 STALLS MO r t\\:1:0 \\...1V �•[.� 1 7 �KS 4.1, �T� �. 6 NLS TA�1( MAP HL RI 2 s1I80A STORE NO. r U\\\\ • 8 AWAY VEIL C(PERSSONAL SERVICE) S.F. 4 STALLS TAX LOT MA6Eb 100 • d O ' 10 GENERAL MlT1zt110�N NCEITTER (GEN.SERVED 1.200 200 S.F. 4 STALLS ZONNG DESIGNATION. C-0 (GENERAL COOERCIA.) 1NpppKS DRY (LANACRY SERVICE) 400 SF. 4 STALLS �� 1 12 ALeOtTS0115 0 i eEVERAOE RETAIL) 51.861 S.F. 278 STALLS CONTACT LIST ` INI• • INCL-EXPANSION 43� a DRAWN CHECKED I 2• 13 A�W,A�I,T COOL REt ir.`'ASSU°iEU) rra sF. 4 sTAUs \�\\�� '� ""' u °ii nIO�IIo °NG) t�960 SF. aD STALLS APPLICANT - rs KATHERINE Io)IK 16 MA IO)NG) �9p600 S.F. 21 SSTTA1S PAL ' NBERTSONS.IC. DATE OE-2•-9E TS7 EltAiDTAycuPsEAJATmaCPERSINALIE2VailiNKMDPUINKMSERVICE) 400 SF. 3�0 81 250 PMK CQITER BLVD. • to 0) SF. 30 PHI(�)�-' 3 TAXI('2061 x-6442 SHEET TITLE r 10 SERV CO 4 O° S F. 4 20 RT AILDt I TA)u a S.F. 13 TAIL • 21 wEN 30 , S.F. 75 AGEN T - 19t RANDY DAVISON EXHIBIT A .° � ) \\ \_. �� u �oNTiEKT(K.SAW Tw TWICE) 10 S.F. STALLS ARCHITECT. ws�GROUP NRC►nECTS SITE PLAN • • 24 GAS STATIOWCAt SASH (CONY.SAES) S.F. p Mil 9150 I.PE 670 0-T- r 25 YaDONADS (EATING NC DRINKING) 4 S.F. 108 ST MPIP 8603) -73-7350 FAX (b03)982-3348 (((��� •�,� 11 G 'M"A`''' 'O,NARcE) 100 SF: 18 $ (SHEET / `��\.�\\�\\\��\�\�\' ... TOTALS 181.043 S.F. 807 STALLS OWNER. CENTER 0 NOM TWELVE,IAL GROUP.NC. 0/ 1 J ' i FIVE CENTEAPONT DRIVE.STE.260 •c. `/ PARKING REQUIREMENTS OREGON , 2 b IL / ' ,..=i 1oaO SALES RETAL V400 S F.(PLUS 1 FOR EVERY 2 EMPLOYEES) �{/ • PETAL SALTS V400 SF.OIT LESS THAN 4 SPACE'S) Jr 14 Ic° 0e)65exha.dr�n //r • TNO AC OR9WN0 ESTAf3<SHIENTS V50 S.F.(PLUS I FOR EVERY 2 EMPLOYEES) ` • • V350 $F. t•_••_••_ _••_•• ••_ ■•_ _ _•• ••_••_••_••_ _••_••_•• ••_ _•• _ _•o_••_••�• OL SERVICE V500 S.F. PRE-SCHOOL -IROE,OmTEH 6 SPACES (PLUS IPER CLASSROOM) LMRCRY 1/500 S.F.040T LESS THAN 31 SCHM'-IT SANITARY SERVT'E, INC. 8325 S.W. Ross St. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Phone 639-2378 Solid Waste Disposal, Recycling, and Drop Box Service Established in 1948 January 13, 1999 RECEIVED C�riir JAN 211999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MGA S'•dR ?e - dot? 9150 SW Pioneer Court - Suite T Wilsonville, Or 97070 RE: Albertsons @ 16200 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, Or Dear Ed: As per telephone conversation of this date, I feel that we will not have a problem with the additional expansion. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me. Sincer ly, / if SCHM T SANITARY SERVICE, INC CY ,st t Larry Schmidt k.. V