The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1998-00024 SDR98 - 00024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0024 CITY OFTIGARD Community(Devetpment EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 4/2/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 98-0024 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval for the construction of a 1-story commercial office building of approximately 6,000 square feet. APPLICANT: J.T. Roth, Jr. OWNER: R & W Partners Theresa A. Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment (MUE) with Tigard Triangle Design Standards Overlay. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. STAFF DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. (Unless otherwise specified, the Staff contact is Brian Rager with the Engineering Department at 503-639-4171.) 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. The plan shall indicate that street trees will be placed between the sidewalk and street at a minimum spacing of 22 feet on center in compliance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards for local streets. The applicant must also submit written evidence provided by a landscape architect that the proposed street tree species meet the spreading dimension specified. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 2. The revised site plan shall indicate that a bicycle rack with a minimum of one (1) bicycle parking space will be provided. The bicycle rack shall be located in compliance with TMC 18.106.020.0.2. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 3. The revised site plan shall indicate that a six-inch (6") vertical separation between walkways and driveways/parking areas will be provided. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 4. The existing reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 5. The applicant shall submit a mitigation tree planting plan for the proposed off-site mitigation planting. As an alternative a fee-in-lieu may be paid to reimburse the City's cost for future planting of said trees. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 6. If the City Council does not approve the LID, the applicant will be required to obtain a public improvement permit from the City to construct certain public improvements to serve this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 7. If a public improvement permit is required, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional ROW at the corner of SW 69`h Avenue and SW Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. 10. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 3/4-street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet (plus 8' of pavement on the opposite side of the centerline); B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights, as determined by the City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. street signs; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 11. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 1/2-street improvement along the frontage of SW Franklin Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Franklin Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. If the applicant is required to construct street improvements, a profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 13. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 14. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall extend the 8-inch public sanitary sewer line northerly in 69th Avenue to the north property line of this site. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 15. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and will be based upon the most current fee adopted by USA and the City. The fee will be calculated by the Commercial Plans Examiner. Staff Contact: Jim Funk, Building Division. 16. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: 17. Prior to final building inspection, If the proposed LID is approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the LID improvements shall be substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition will not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided the applicant has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve the building. 18. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements for this project, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 19. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG"format, if available; otherwise "DXF"will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: City records do not indicate any previous development approvals were granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW 68th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. All of the immediate area is zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE). Surrounding land uses include an office building immediately to the east of the site, parking lots associated with commercial land use to the north and south, and vacant land to the west. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is zoned MUE and is currently vacant. The site is relatively level and contains approximately 14 trees over 6" caliper. The proposal is to construct a 6,000 square foot, single story office building. Access would be achieved from SW 68th Avenue and from SW Franklin Street. NOTE: This application was submitted on November 23, 1998, before the effective date of the revised Community Development Code. In conformance with ORS 227.178(3), the proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable code standards in effect at the time of submittal. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an Impact Study as part of the application submittal. The site has frontage on SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Neither of these streets is a collector or arterial street and therefore the cost of the street improvements is not reviewed for proportionality. A small right-of-way dedication is required as part of this proposal to provide the necessary corner radius. Due to the small size of the dedication, a calculation is not required to determine that the dedication is significantly less than proportional to the unmitigated impact of the development. Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street, and that streets within and adjacent to a development shall be improved in accordance with City standards. Therefore, streets meeting City standards must be provided in conjunction with all development. Development within the Tigard Triangle must provide street improvements as required in the Triangle Design Standards. The applicant's proposal includes the provision of street improvements along both abutting right-of-ways as described later in this decision. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build an office building. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Administrative and Professional Offices. The site is within the Mixed Use Employment (MUE) Zoning District. Section 18.67.030 lists professional and administrative services as a permitted use in the MUE zone. Therefore, the proposal complies with this Community Development Code section. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Dimensional Requirements: The MUE Zoning District standards contained in Section 18.67.050 states that the dimensional requirements of the C-G Zoning District apply to commercial development in the MUE district. The MUE Zoning District, as set forth in Section 18.67.060, also requires a maximum floor area ratio of .40 for commercial buildings. The C-G Zoning District standards contained in Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15 percent landscaping and a maximum of 85% of the site may be developed with impervious surfaces. The site area is approximately 15,000 square feet and has a minimum width of approximately 100 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the applicant proposes to provide 2,359 square feet of landscaping which is equal to 15.7% of the site. The remaining 84.3% of the site will be developed in hard surfaces. The Development Code defines 'Floor Area' as: "The gross horizontal area under a roof, of all floors of a building, measured from the exterior walls, excluding vents, shafts, courts and space devoted to off-street parking." Based on this definition, the applicant has calculated the "net" floor area to be 6,000 square feet, which represents a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 40 percent. Based on these facts, the project is found to be in compliance with the above dimensional standards. Setbacks: The applicable C-G zone standards, as provided in Section 18.62.050, state that front, side, or rear yard setbacks are not required, except that 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. As noted earlier, the site is surrounded by MUE zoned property. The MUE zoning district is considered a commercial zoning district although it allows residential uses, therefore, setbacks are not required between the proposed development and adjacent MUE properties. Building Height: The dimensional standards of the MUE zone are taken from the C-G zone for commercial uses. The C-G zone, as provided in Section 19.62.050, states that the maximum height of building is 45 feet. The applicant's elevations plan indicates that the proposed building will stand approximately 18 feet high, well within the 45-foot maximum height. Therefore, this standard is met. TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including the creation of a high- quality mixed use employment area, provision of a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilization of streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in non single- family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how either the design option or performance option will be met. A Variance to these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Design Option: A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile; B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight line distance; C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. This project meets the Design Option standards, above, as follows: The site abuts public streets on two sides. Both streets will be improved in conjunction with the development of the site thereby providing both vehicle and pedestrian connections at the north and west of the site. East of the north-south connection (SW 69t)), the next street is located within approximately 200 feet in full compliance with both pedestrian and vehicular connectivity standards. South of the intersection, the next street is located within approximately 950 feet. Therefore, additional pedestrian and vehicular connections are necessary to meet the standards (2 additional pedestrian and one additional vehicular connection would be required). However, since the site extends only 150 feet south of a public street, none of these additional connections would be required within the subject property. Therefore, this standard is met. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger, a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.134.050 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building Placement on Major and Minor Arterials: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. This standard does not apply because neither SW 69th Avenue nor SW Franklin Street is a Major or Minor Arterial. Building Setback: Buildings are required to be setback a minimum of 0 feet and maximum of 10 feet from the public street right-of-way. The applicant's site plan indicates that the proposed setback from both abutting right-of-ways is approximately two to three feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Front Yard Setback: This standard requires landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path be provided between a structure and a public street or access way. The applicant's plan shows landscaping will be located within the area between the building and street along SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. Therefore, this standard is met. Walkway Connection to Building Entrances: This standard states that a walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or access way. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with a scored concrete or modular paving materials. The applicant's plan indicates that the building would have its main entrance on the south wall of the building, facing the parking area and a service entrance on the east wall facing the access easement. The site plan shows a six-foot wide concrete walkway linking both entrances to the public sidewalk. Therefore, this standard is met. Parking Location and Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The applicant's site plan shows a parking area in the south portion of the project site. The parking area is behind the building from the SW Franklin Street perspective and to the side of the building from the SW 69th Avenue perspective. Where the parking lot is to the side of the building (SW 69th Avenue), the parking lot occupies 65 feet of the 150 foot frontage (approximately 43%). The landscape plan indicates that the parking area will be screened from this frontage. The applicable screening standards are those under 18.100 because the Tigard Triangle Standards for L1 landscaping defer to these for local street screening. Section 18.100.080.E requires a continuous four-foot high screen of evergreen shrubs. The applicant's landscape plan indicates a continuous shrub screen, although the species selected will reach a maximum height of only three feet. However, since all of the parking lot landscape area is regulated as Visual Clearance Area (maximum height of any structure or landscaping is three feet), the four-foot height requirement is superseded and this standard is, therefore, met. Building Design Standards: Ground Floor Windows: This standard requires all street facing elevations within the building setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets to contain a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area used for windows, display areas or doorway openings. The elevation plans and the window area calculations provided indicate that the north, west and northwest building elevations (street facing elevations) will have over 50 percent of the ground floor wall area used for windows or doorway openings. The plans indicate that 185 square feet of window area is required on the north wall, where 187 square feet is proposed; that 144 square feet is required on the west wall, where 145 square feet is proposed; and that 106 square feet is required on the northwest wall, where 108 square feet is proposed. Based on the calculations provided, therefore, this standard is met. Building Facades: This standard requires that facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing certain features to break up the building line. It also requires that no building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The building's longest facade extends only 86' 6", thus, the requirement for a pedestrian connection through the building does not apply. The elevations provided indicate that, of the three street-facing facades (north, northwest and west), only the north- facing facade extends more than 50 feet (61.5 feet). The proposed north elevation indicates that three brick build-outs will be provided at a 22-24 foot spacing interval. The narrative explains that these details will be faced in a smaller, contrasting color brick. This will provide the required "variation in building materials" and therefore, this standard is met. Weather Protection: This standard requires that weather protection for pedestrians be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or access way. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. The proposed site plan, architectural elevations, and the applicant's narrative indicate that the building's main entrance, located on the south facade, will be provided with a four-foot facade to act as an entry cover. Weather protection along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street is only encouraged, not required, therefore the applicant's proposal meets this standard. Building Materials: This standard prohibits the use of plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding as an exterior finish for materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and on the elevation drawings that the building materials will consist of brick veneer. The concrete foundation would be revealed approximately 6 - 8 inches. Based on this information, the building materials standards are met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Roofs and Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the buildings structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. Based on the elevation plans submitted, the rooflines comply with this requirement. No false fronts or roofs are shown. Therefore, this standard is met. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and elevation drawings that the roof parapet is designed to visually screen the rooftop mounted equipment. Therefore, this standard is met. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant's narrative and architectural drawings indicate that one freestanding sign is proposed at the intersection of SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. The code limits the area of such signs to 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. The applicant's proposal states that the sign will have a total size less than 32 square feet. The elevation drawings also indicate a wall sign at the building entrance. The code limits wall sign size to five percent of the gross wall area of the wall face on which the sign is to be mounted. According to the elevations provided, the south facade is approximately 1,400 square feet which would allow a wall sign of about 70 square feet (1,400 x 5% = 70). The proposed wall sign is shown at approximately 15 x 3.5 feet (52.5 square feet) which is within the allowable wall sign area. Therefore, based on the above analysis, both proposed signs meet the standard. Compliance with the standard at the time of construction will be ensured through the sign permit process. Landscaping And Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Ground cover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the L- 1 landscape standard applies to setbacks on Major and Minor Arterials and this site does not have no frontage on a major or minor arterial, the L-1 standards do not apply to this site. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a local street, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Section 18.100. Compliance with the Landscaping and Screening standards of Section 18.100 is discussed later in this decision. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.120.180.a.1 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.67, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following have already been addressed under the TTDS and will not be addressed in this section: 18.114 (Signs) Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120) Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(a) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4.B. states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110.a requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features that effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant's landscape plan indicates that the parking lot will be screened with a five-foot landscape strip adjacent to SW 69th Avenue and a three-foot strip at the south and east property line. The proposed landscaping includes azaleas and rock cotoneasters adjacent to the east and west access points. Pyramidal arborvitae are added to the planting schedule along the south property line. The low lying shrubbery adjacent to the street is appropriate given the location of access points and the vision clearance standards associated with them. The addition of arborvitae on the south property line will provide the required "relative balance" between low lying and vertical shrubbery. The landscape plan indicates that four Chanticleer Pear trees (Pyrus Calleryana) will be provided in 5-foot landscape islands within the parking lot. Based on the above analysis, this standard is met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential use, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Further, it indicates that where a parking area that provides 4-50 parking spaces abuts a residential use, the required buffer and screening width shall be ten (10) feet. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1. At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2. In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of required buffer area; and 3. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or spread with bark mulch. There area no adjacent residential uses. The property is bounded to the north and west by right-of-way and abuts commercial development to the east and vacant land to the south. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant's landscaping plan indicates that Norway Maples are proposed as street trees along SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. The Western Garden Book describes the Norway Maple `Cleveland' (Acer platanoides) as a compact tree, about 50 feet tall. The proposed street trees are shown between the property line and the rear of the sidewalk, spaced approximately 35 feet apart. The Tigard Triangle Development Standards require street trees spreading to 25 feet to be planted 22 feet on center along local streets between the sidewalk and the street. The Triangle Development Standards supersede other standards in the Tigard Development Code. Based on the information provided by the applicant, the street tree standards have not been met. In order for staff to determine that the standards have been met, the applicant must submit a revised street tree plan for review as required by Condition of Approval #1. The plan must indicate that street trees will be placed between the sidewalk and street at a minimum spacing of 22 feet on center. The applicant must also submit written evidence provided by a landscape architect that the proposed street tree species will meet the spreading dimension specified. Therefore, compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (Section 18.102): This section requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The project includes visual clearance areas at the corner of SW 69th Avenue and Franklin and at the driveway entrance off SW 69th. The applicant proposes to place a sign at the corner, within the visual clearance area. The sign elevation provided indicates that the sign would stand exactly 3 feet high in conformance with the visual clearance area standards. The shrubs proposed for the parking lot screening adjacent to SW 69th should grow to a maximum height of three feet according to the Western Garden Book, which is also in compliance with the visual clearance area standards. Therefore, based on the analysis above, the visual clearance area standards have been met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Off-Street Parking and Loading (Section 18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.C.20 requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 350 square feet of gross floor area for Professional Offices. A maximum of 40 percent of required parking spaces can be developed as compact parking spaces. The applicant has proposed a building of approximately 6,000 gross square feet. At a rate of one space per 350 square feet, the total parking requirement for the project is, therefore, 17 spaces. The plan provides 19 parking spaces, 6 of which are proposed to be compact (32%). Therefore, this standard is met. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Based on the number of required parking spaces (19) noted above, a total of 1 bicycle parking rack space is required for this project. The applicant's narrative states that bicycle parking will be provided but the plans do not indicate its location. The site design provides adequate space for provision of bicycle parking in compliance with this standard. Condition of Approval # 2 requires that the applicant submit a revised site plan indicating that the location of the proposed bicycle parking space is as required by this standard. Therefore, compliance with this condition of approval will ensure that this criterion is met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The proposed office building will have a floor area of approximately 6,000 square feet, therefore this criterion does not apply. Access Egress and Circulation Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This site has 19 parking spaces and so one access point is required. The applicant proposes two access points, one from each abutting street. The east access point is via a 24- foot easement that runs parallel to the east property line and perpendicular to SW Franklin Street. The site plan indicates a pavement width of 24 feet with 30 feet of total width provided at the entrance. Walkways: Section 18.108.050.a requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As discussed previously in this decision, walkways have been provided in compliance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The proposed walkways must also meet the above separation standards and be designed and constructed to comply with ADA regulations. The proposed site plan indicates that the walkway will not be separated from traffic and parking by at least three feet. A minimum 6 inch vertical separation is therefore required but is not indicated on the plans. Condition of Approval #3 requires that the revised site plan indicate that a 6-inch vertical separation between walkways, and driveways and parking areas will be provided. Compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. Joint Access: Section 18.108.030 states that owners of two (2) or more parcels may agree to jointly utilize the same access and egress when the combined access satisfies the combined requirements provided that satisfactory legal evidence is presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases, or contracts to establish the joint use and copies are placed on permanent file with the City. The proposed east access utilizes a joint access easement shared with the EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 development to the east on SW Franklin and 70th Avenue. However, since only one access is required and the applicant has provided an access way off SW 69th that meets City standards, proof of a joint access easement for this is not required for approval of this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110.B states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The site abuts undeveloped land to the south and developed, commercial land to the east. As noted above, a shared access easement exists along the length of the east property line. This easement allows for a connection between the parking lot for the proposed project and the existing parking area located on the property to the east. Condition of Approval #4 requires that the applicant submit a copy of the easement for review and approval. Therefore, this standard is met. Tree Removal (Section 18.150.025): This section requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a Site Development Review application. The tree plan shall identify all existing trees and identify a tree preservation and mitigation program. The program shall either save existing trees over 12 inches in caliper or mitigate for the removal of such trees. The program shall identify which trees are to be removed and describe a tree protection program including specific standards and methods that will be employed during and after construction. The applicant has provided a tree report prepared by a certified arborist. The report states that all trees will be removed in order to develop the site but that only three healthy trees over 12" caliper will be removed. The report states that the total caliper inches that require mitigation totals 74" and Appendix 1 to the report lists each individual trees to be removed and mitigated. The applicant has proposed to plant approximately half of the required mitigation trees (35 caliper inches) on-site and to plant the balance (39 caliper inches) off-site, within the City, as provided in this Section. The mitigation plan is acceptable to the City provided that no required street trees, parking lot trees or landscaping and screening trees are included as part of the mitigation calculation. Upsizing of required trees may be counted toward the project's mitigation requirement. Condition of Approval #5 requires that the applicant submit a mitigation tree planting plan for the 39 caliper inches of proposed off-site mitigation trees or the applicant may pay a fee-in—lieu as provided under TMC 18.790.060.E. Therefore, compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 69`h Avenue and SW Franklin Street, both of which are classified as local streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requiring 60-foot rights-of-way (ROW). At present there is 60 feet of ROW on both streets. There will be a need for additional ROW to be dedicated at the corner of 69th Avenue and Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide this dedication. Proposed Local Improvement District(LID) Specht Development, who is proposing to develop three office buildings adjacent to 69`h Avenue between Beveland Street and Dartmouth Street, has submitted a proposal to the City for the formation of • a local improvement district (LID) to improve the following roadway segments: • SW 69th Avenue between Dartmouth Street and Beveland Street • SW Dartmouth Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue • SW Elmhurst Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 • SW Franklin Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue, and • SW Beveland Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue. The City Engineer approached the City Council on October 13, 1998 with a recommendation to prepare a preliminary engineering report to form the LID. The Council approved a motion authorizing the City Engineer to prepare this report. The engineering report is scheduled to be presented to the Council in February 1999. If Council votes to form the LID, construction of the improvements should occur during Summer 1999, with completion around September, 1999. Staff has discussed the timing aspects of the LID versus construction of the buildings in Specht's project and the City has stated that final inspections for the buildings will not be given until the public improvements associated with the LID are substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition would not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided Specht has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve their building(s). Staff is of the opinion that this same condition should apply to the subject project as well. If the Council chooses not to form the LID, the applicant will be expected to complete a 3/4-street improvement on 69' Avenue and a 1/2-street improvement on Franklin Street adjacent to their site. WATER: This site lies within the area served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). The applicant will need to coordinate with TVWD with respect to water service for this site. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that is south of this site. If the proposed LID is approved by the City Council, a northerly extension of this sewer line will be included in the project. If the LID is not approved, the applicant will need to extend the sewer line northerly in the street and to the far north property line as a part of their street improvements. STORM DRAINAGE: There is a 15-inch public storm sewer line in SW 69' Avenue that drains the street toward SW Hampton Street. The applicant is proposing to direct all on-site flows to this storm line. A downstream analysis was completed by the applicant's engineer which indicates the additional storm water flows from this development will not exceed the capacity of the public storm system. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The R & 0 includes a provision that would allow the applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a water quality facility if the applicant can demonstrate that the site is small and if a facility were to be designed, effective development of the site would be precluded. The applicant's engineer submitted an argument that states the site is limited on space and outside of the required parking areas, there is not enough room to effectively design a water quality facility. Staff finds that the engineer's argument is valid and that this particular project should qualify for the fee in-lieu. Based upon the engineer's calculations, this site will have approximately 12,390 square feet of new impervious surfaces. The current fee is $210/ESU, where an ESU is equivalent to 2,640 square feet of impervious surface. In this case, there would be approximately 4.7 ESU's on this site and the fee would be approximately $ 987.00. The fee would be payable prior to final building inspection. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 17 SOR 98-0024 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Section 18.120.180.A.2 through 18.120.180.A. 17 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the following provisions and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces); and 18.120.180 (Public Transit). The following TMC sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.13 (Parking); 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); 18.120.180.15 (Drainage); 18.120.180.17 (Signs); and 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's site plan indicates the location of the trash enclosure to the east of the proposed building. The applicant has provided written evidence that the franchise hauler has reviewed and approved the location as shown. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Due to the relatively small size of the site, little or none of the existing trees, topography or natural drainage will be preserved. The location of the building on the site has been determined as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and parking has been provided as required by the Tigard Development Code. Since the applicant has met the maximum 0.40 Floor Area Ratio and provided only two more parking spaces than the minimum requirement of the code, this criterion has been met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. The proposed use is an office building. It is not anticipated that such a use would create noise, excessive lighting or glare. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Staff forwarded the proposal to the City of Tigard Police Department for comments. The Police Department has not provided any objections or concerns with regard to the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Access and Circulation: Section 18.120.180.11 requires access points as provided in 18.108.070. All circulation patterns within a development must be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; provisions must be made for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways if shown on adopted plans. The proposed access points are in compliance with Section 18.108.070 as discussed earlier in this decision. No City planning documents or maps indicate that any pedestrian or bicycle ways are planned for this area. Therefore, this criterion is met. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020.M became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 9 disabled parking spaces when 401-500 parking spaces are provided. The applicant has proposed a total of 19 parking spaces. For a parking lot of this size, the ADA regulations require a minimum of 1 accessible space. In addition, at least one space must be van accessible. The applicant has provided one handicap parking space according to the site plan. The space appears to be sized correctly for a van accessible space. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Final compliance will be confirmed through the building permit process. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF AND AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: • East wall must be 1-hour construction • Trash enclosure on east side shall be 1-hour construction • A trash dumpster >_ 1.5 cu yard shall not be located under or within 5 feet of combustible construction • Locate accessible parking access aisle and route to public way, curb ramp and entrance. Conflict between Sheet #1 and grading/site plan regarding location of accessible parking. City of Tigard Property Manager/Operations Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. GTE has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Developer to place conduit per GTE specifications. Developer to pay any relocation costs. The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Sanitary Sewer Each lot shall be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer in accordance with R&O 96-44 (USA's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. If the units are to be sold individually, then a separate lateral is required for each unit. Storm Sewer Each lot should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of stormwater conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. Water Quality Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the stormwater runoff generated by new impervious surface. • There are other methods of water quality treatment for commercial sites that would be under private maintenance and would not take up additional site space. Fee in lieu is not an option since other options are available. Sensitive Area A "sensitive area" exists (may exist). Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. Staff Response: Staff has incorporated the above comments into this decision. Local knowledge of development in the area and information form information form site visits indicate that the potential sensitive area does not exists on this site. Tualatin Valley Fire & District, NW Natural Gas, US West, TCI Cable, and Tri-met were given the opportunity to review the proposal and submit comments and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: JANUARY 7, 1999 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JANUARY 27, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE'DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. / January 7. 1999 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner t-'77 i January 7. 1999 APP.'OVED BY: shard Bewersdo / - DATE Planning Manager / i:\curpin\mjr\sdr1sdr98-24.dec EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 A S.W. FRANKLIN STREET > A? f 1 o0. oo' f __ cD ......._ii% I J, 1::— /W > Z 0 LU Q V 1/• NEW BUILDING 3 1 Z z 0 O 6,000 sq. ft. - (I story) r �Endosurt Q` O Z ® T Z Z ( o w 0 .� � ■ - a _ _ ,.. _ E-, w Q 1— C7........,• t)) 1 4,NI } v,,,,,4 sN, E ... 9 standard spaces 3 compact spaces 0 LL, 1 standard spaces I >" 3 compact spaces /1 I I .,. 1 I=.- sue— ,�I �—_� J.T.,,,L,.. V MO CO ' I CASE NM&CASE NAME[S]: 2 SiTF PLAN SDR 98-0024 E EMPLOYERS XHIBIT MAP OVERLOAD yRIPICt■ . atiThhigillillrl 11111 ill xr161 if]j CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1 t ___ VICINITY MAP ■ WI IIIIIIIIIMI DARTMOUTH ST 1 iii "1■ SD R 98-0024 11.1 ".r■ I EMPLOYERS ST i OVERLOAD Imill iis, 111111110 ,1, .11111Uj 1110111111L SITE INN" 1iiI - F.• KLI N ■ T Q:a :...9 ST wine' ille. 1111 All III z 1111 G Ills ONZAGA will " 'ii . 11.71111 , sw ..., HAMPTON ST N• 0 200 400 600 Fest ilk 1'=440 feet III II 1 t\ii City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and 1111 Should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 .-,-_____` ^ H (503)839-4171 �" httpJMww.ci. d onus Community Development Plot date:Dec 4,1998;C:\rnagic\MAGICO2.APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • ` 1 • POW UL$1.0N * 13600 SL TAYLOR CT. * PORTLAND,:.;'1t;'..,9723 503!Y62-8015 " FAX 5031297-1892 •• • r`•:r•:. NOVEMBER 20,MOB, _.• s• • i . • CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DEPT, ! ' • 13125 SW HALL.BLVD. ;• '' TIGARD, OR. .Q723.: : % ;,� •RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ;' BLK 29 WEST PC}RI HEIGHT WASH. CO. ' TAX LOT 80 f. : • } .• ;, ; . f `, HEAR SIRS r: 5 ' THIS PROJECT WILL INCLUDE THE SITE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION QF ,6rQ00 SQ:.FT. . : BUILDING FOR USE AS A OFFICE BUILDINGS. THIS SITE, IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED;'.W TS,.:•�V.I E)STING• BUILDINGS. `' 1. FLOOR AREA RATIO: • ; 40%OF SITE SI, 16;000 =6,000.0 S.O. F'T`. ?`�• : • Y . `. TOTAL BUILDING AREA ; Y ' . ;I.., 4 • -i• I FIRST rt.00ri AREA 6,000: SQ. FT. . • 4' ••• s' ' ' • ` . ;'• .i<.. ": •r''C. ••• ., ' 2. THE PROJECTIDCOST ESTIMATE FOR THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION;IS BA$EO 04:2; 4:41E4:SQ. F7•; . ; • FOR THE BUILDING SHELL AREA. 6,000 SQ. FT, AT •00 _. --------__.. ,4.Q. �7 n ' • • ' :; i i PLEASE�LALL!ME AT 252••8015 OR TIM ROI H AT 639-2639 IF YOU HAVE ANY Q U :, {,Q ,;:,"';• ' ` •. • RE PECTFULLY$I)EMITI ED, . I• .PETER WASCH'. .;:. s. •.�•` ' {. • • • • • . . •I � . . ' ri• Please... R0UT1N & RUEs T ,2 Read To: L r_ Handle ❑ Approve one.-► / And... ❑ Forward if st �t Nk R °6L i .,o,� Return `-� , t C� 7 Keep or Recycle I I Review with Me From: , --Z I it cx- C ( Post-it®7664®3M 1995 ) Date: 1, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping (Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: December 7,1998 DEC 0 8 1998 TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager CITY OF TIGAKL, FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (THURSDAY - DECEMBER 11,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: kt<LE A1az x395— SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TI'GARD Community Development RECEIVED PLANNINGhapingA Better Community DATE: December7,1998 DEC 0 3 1998 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department GM OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone:(5031639-4111 Fax:[5031684-7291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISOB)98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the fotro wing it format ion)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 414 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IIGARD Community Development RECEIVED PLANE$ ngA'Better Community DATE: December 7,1998 DEC 11 1998 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 5W 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the fo&wing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: 1/4 -e-F Phone Number[sl: 1 v - � SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TIGARD Community Deveropment Shaping Better Community DATE: December 7,1998 TO: David Scott,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone:[5031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISOR198-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: �i) E/t-I f u r' /viva )- 6 P et) n r e (2 ) TWA-11. Ir4e IA )) ht / - i r " Kj7 (3) A Fv'4 60 r tel. 7 y Y C.d y.( t.( .� // , 0 1- h , 1oe4Lr,/ KY■ll/r or L ) t.( >>. r •r.. .. 9- , `4 f r. _04) 1.0e-� �_ 4 Jr, dl, ifit? , l /IrJJ -4 )iL c 7 r'nL, jj'-c e•., 11,c IN e y y, J, f �b ,0 .t h./ 1^LA1(� v11�=L/ t ��t �Wt�� r /` It i o; G•e*A / �� /11) (Please provide the foffowing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Numher(sl: 3 l) SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS r(c,,A6L-d" REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TI,GARD Community(Deveropment ShapingA Better Community DATE: December 7,1998 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program D 1 0 1998 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division ST [f CONTACT: MJ.R I bens Associate Planner(x315) Phone 15031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-1291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. >C. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 2 Pc, Y.G\ 1. � - r/X C,°e i �s (PCease provide the fodowing infonnation)Name of Person(s)Commenting ✓�.� I l I Phone Number(sl: ;') - z!10 4- SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLANNt ifingA'BetterCommunity DATE: December 1,1998 DEC 1 5 1998 TO: Elaine Self,GTE CIT`(OF TIVAtiu FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner[x3151 Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:[5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD !Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th I Avenue; VVCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: azAk- 6-rg_A-7Th Ccw , ��J a Tr_ � .. _ . � I his • .' ,:ob■ _*� � A /• I • l.: it (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(sl: (3q_',9 "R 7 SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A , UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1998 TO: MJ Roberts, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA 1',(.` , SUBJECT: Employers Overload, SDR 98-0024 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. • There are other methods of water quality treatment for commercial sites that would be under private maintenance and would not take up additional site space. Fee in lieu is not an option since others options are available. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists (may exist). Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 SW ' f ' I,' ■ 4* 1 4' VIIII■ % " r°11FA fir igivripi i i , um, vim%II ipAi i or- • ams - ;, is au _ h WY 0 iti . .... „1,..,,isi. r � 1 ft, ii„„.iii r , _ , _ ,,,„„0,4 teal ....Tag grit 0001111 API 40711, 11111....1 lilii VII ' gr--7.111,......:....1 1 eillibMW31111 -4" SW II 0 grAffr UP.,„ si ,;,,,,„„ is ineopoolks 14 yr , tiS 0 '-------- Iii 110 V141141" - ' --%''''' WI 7 416 7..., r o _ __ , 4. , gismo II s „„.„..,,,,. ,„ .,,,,,:: . .,,, ...,,,,, , ,,,, ii,,,:„.. , \ rpollt, . •‘,.. ...,...... 41101100.. _ _____--- •'' .,' tail le ss _.� 1.4" A S ir S t.... .... ..-' ratill /'' IlC x+,� C k 7 7 ,' i op Ih. Ilk / i Ili 41)k. - III ve. ..,0, NivilinP:, ati,,,,, 4is --- wor:idert -.. s s •. S • ice'' } teEt.- glirti&ii. -----17-:-:-\--:----_ -__________------- Ill 1100 • ,, t ti 01 I I I 911:4:: t a ■ \\._ s m a III _ -- ,mah r _ s , , s t MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: December 31, 1998 TO: Mark J. Roberts, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 98-0024, Employer's Overload Description: This application is for the construction of a 6,000 square foot (sf) office building at 12540 SW 69th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01AA, Tax Lot 8300). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street, both of which are classified as local streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requiring 60-foot rights-of-way (ROW). At present there is 60 feet of ROW on both streets. There will be a need for additional ROW to be dedicated at the corner of 69th Avenue and Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide this dedication. Proposed Local Improvement District(LID) Specht Development, who is proposing to develop three office buildings adjacent to 69th Avenue between Beveland Street and Dartmouth Street, has submitted a proposal to the City for the formation of a local improvement district (LID) to improve the following roadway segments: • SW 69th Avenue between Dartmouth Street and Beveland Street • SW Dartmouth Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue • SW Elmhurst Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue • SW Franklin Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue, and • SW Beveland Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue. The City Engineer approached the City Council on October 13, 1998 with a recommendation to prepare a preliminary engineering report to form the LID. The Council approved a motion authorizing the City Engineer to prepare this report. The engineering report is scheduled to be presented to the Council in February 1999. If Council votes to form the LID, construction of the improvements should occur during Summer 1999, with ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 1 completion around September, 1999. Staff has discussed the timing aspects of the LID versus construction of the buildings in Specht's project and the City has stated that final inspections for the buildings will not be given until the public improvements associated with the LID are substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition would not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided Specht has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve their building(s). Staff is of the opinion that this same condition should apply to the subject project as well. If the Council chooses not to form the LID, the applicant will be expected to complete a 3/4-street improvement on 69th Avenue and a 1/2-street improvement on Franklin Street adjacent to their site. 2. Water: This site lies within the area served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). The applicant will need to coordinate with TVWD with respect to water service for this site. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that is south of this site. If the proposed LID is approved by the City Council, a northerly extension of this sewer line will be included in the project. If the LID is not approved, the applicant will need to extend the sewer line northerly in the street and to the far north property line as a part of their street improvements. 4. Storm Drainage: There is a 15-inch public storm sewer line in SW 69th Avenue that drains the street toward SW Hampton Street. The applicant is proposing to direct all on-site flows to this storm line. A downstream analysis was completed by the applicant's engineer which indicates the additional storm water flows from this development will not exceed the capacity of the public storm system. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 2 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The R & 0 includes a provision that would allow the applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a water quality facility if the applicant can demonstrate that the site is small and if a facility were to be designed, effective development of the site would be precluded. The applicant's engineer submitted an argument that states the site is limited on space and outside of the required parking areas, there is not enough room to effectively design a water quality facility. Staff finds that the engineer's argument is valid and that this particular project should qualify for the fee in-lieu. Based upon the engineer's calculations, this site will have approximately 12,390 sf of new impervious surfaces. The current fee is $210/ESU, where an ESU is equivalent to 2,640 sf of impervious surface. In this case, there would be approximately 4.7 ESU's on this site and the fee would be approximately $ 987.00. The fee would be payable prior to final building inspection. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. If the City Council does not approve the LID, the applicant will be required to obtain a public improvement permit from the City to construct certain ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 3 public improvements to serve this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. If a public improvement permit is required, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 4. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional ROW at the corner of SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. 5. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 3/4-street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet (plus 8' of pavement on the opposite side of the centerline) b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff e. 6-foot concrete sidewalk f. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements g. street striping h. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer underground utilities ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 4 j. street signs k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 6. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 1/2-street improvement along the frontage of SW Franklin Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet b. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage c. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed d. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff e. 6-foot concrete sidewalk f. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements g. street striping h. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer underground utilities j. street signs k. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Franklin Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 7. If the applicant is required to construct street improvements, a profile of SW 69th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 8. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 9. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall extend the 8-inch public sanitary sewer line northerly in 69th Avenue to the north property line of this site. 10. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and will be based upon the most current fee adopted by USA and the City. The fee will be calculated by the Commercial Plans Examiner. Staff Contact: Jim Funk, Building Division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 5 11 . An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 12. Prior to final building inspection, If the proposed LID is approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the LID improvements shall be substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition will not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided the applicant has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve the building. 13. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements for this project, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 14. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. \U ig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\commentslsd r9B-0024.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 98-0024 Employer's Overload PAGE 6 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: December 7,1998 MAR 1 5 1999 TO: Lori Dorney,US West Communications CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner[[315) Phone:15031639-4171 FaX [5031684-7291 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [THURSDAY - DECEMBER 17,1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: s-\---- (Tase provide the foffowing it formation)Name of Person's]Commenting: v„A, o ar I Phone Number's]: SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS „,, 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI I TIGARD Community(Development Sfiaping A Better Community DATE: December 1,1998 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: MJ.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [THURSDAY - DECEMBER 11,19981 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the foltowing information)Name of Personal Commenting: Phone Nomber(sl: SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQI ES Fl R COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ��u-,) -CITArea: ICI [E] ISI [WI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS m Place for review in Library CITBook[S] FILENOISI.: ck FILENAMEISJ: fit. Z s7J CITY OFFICES ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,PtanMrgsupermsor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Drprmt Smm.T hnivans V POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,oirm pre.,Thon oefice. BUILDING DIV./David Scott,BuAdigar ai ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Drpnvd.Re ew Ergmeer LWATER DEPT./Michael Miller,utieoes Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,crtyoe,,order ..,z OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,ProoerlYWnager _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* 7UALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*.,Z6NIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Negnbmd coord PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(cPA's/ZoAS) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) _WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Punning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis(CPA's) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT,REGION 1 * Scott King(CPA's) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Dvpmt Rev Coord _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Jim Tice(iGAs) David Knowles,Planning Bureau oi, Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Tom Harry(arrest w Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Phil Healy(arrem Pi.Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * Sr.Cartographer i orwzc,iMs,. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Perm,'Speoallst 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section(vac.t.,$) Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS 1 C CI CABLEVISION OF OREGON /TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexaoonsa,N) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 / / PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC /'NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY . GENERAL TELEPHONE L US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering Dept.. 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: 0R030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARDfTUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Mero Road Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 * - IMOICATLL AUTOMATIC MOTIFICATIOM If WITIUM!f0' Of Tat SVBJLCl P&OPL&TY POO AMID/ALL CITY P&OJECt5. froolcCr MAMAS&IS atSPO IS1WLL rest 114OICAtIMC PAaIUS TO mourn h:\patty\masterstrtcnotice.mst 2-Dec-98 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING _t CITY or nonrtD Community(Development Shaping Better Community STACIE OAF OREGON ) • County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'Tigard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: E AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) I City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR 98-0024/EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING AMENDED NOTICE (File No;Name Reference) O City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . AMENDED NOTICE (File No'Name Reference) ;Date of Public Heanng) L City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR:i. .,___ _ I__ U AMENDED NOTICE (Fie No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (TypeiKIno of Notice) FOR: (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 7th day of January, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 1th day of January, 1999, postage repaid. • _ / .e4 . I � 1 (Person that Pr-'Jared otic,� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the c�O day of /'t , 197y • � �,� OFFICIAL SEAL 1� ``' DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY iliiii—O?OtEittj @�?:,; NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �;;;� COMMISSION SEPTEMBER My Commission Expires: J T / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1090 EX HI A! itirICUr S DEVEI OPM 'REVIEW($011118=0024 CITY OF TIGARD � � Community tDeveCopment EIS EII LAD;OFFICE Ska p ngA Better 120 DAYS = 4/2/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 98-0024 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval for the construction of a 1-story commercial office building of approximately 6,000 square feet. APPLICANT: J.T. Roth, Jr. OWNER: R & W Partners Theresa A. Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Employment (MUE) with Tigard Triangle Design Standards Overlay. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II. STAFF DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City gard Commu nity�,Devek pment Oire�S designee 4e-APPROVED thOebove recleeateobject to re $n condition*of aOroval. The findings and conclisiona on whiff thidifaision is.based areilatectintestioti IV; EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AI,,, CONDITIONS-$HALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. U I ss otherwise specified,the$t ff Orlon der With the Engineering Department at 304171.) 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. The plan shall indicate that street trees will be placed between the sidewalk and street at a minimum spacing of 22 feet on center in compliance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards for local streets. The applicant must also submit written evidence provided by a landscape architect that the proposed street tree species meet the spreading dimension specified. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 2. The revised site plan shall indicate that a bicycle rack with a minimum of one (1) bicycle parking space will be provided. The bicycle rack shall be located in compliance with TMC 18.106.020.0.2. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 3. The revised site plan shall indicate that a six-inch (6") vertical separation between walkways and driveways/parking areas will be provided. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 4. The existing reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 5. The applicant shall submit a mitigation tree planting plan for the proposed off-site mitigation planting. As an alternative a fee-in-lieu may be paid to reimburse the City's cost for future planting of said trees. Staff Contact: Mark J. Roberts, Planning Division 639-4171. 6. If the City Council does not approve the LID, the applicant will be required to obtain a public improvement permit from the City to construct certain public improvements to serve this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 7. If a public improvement permit is required, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 8. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 9. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall dedicate additional ROW at the corner of SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. 10. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 3/4-street improvement along the frontage of SW 69th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet (plus 8' of pavement on the opposite side of the centerline); B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights, as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 69th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 11. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall construct a 1/2-street improvement along the frontage of SW Franklin Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 18 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Franklin Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 12. If the applicant is required to construct street improvements, a profile of SW 69`h Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 13. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 14. If the proposed LID is not approved, the applicant shall extend the 8-inch public sanitary sewer line northerly in 69`h Avenue to the north property line of this site. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 15. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and will be based upon the most current fee adopted by USA and the City. The fee will be calculated by the Commercial Plans Examiner. Staff Contact: Jim Funk, Building Division. 16. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: 17. Prior to final building inspection, If the proposed LID is approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the LID improvements shall be substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition will not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided the applicant has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve the building. 18. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements for this project, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 19. If the proposed LID is not approved, the following condition shall apply: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: City records do not indicate any previous development approvals were granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW 68th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. All of the immediate area is zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE). Surrounding land uses include an office building immediately to the east of the site, parking lots associated with commercial land use to the north and south, and vacant land to the west. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is zoned MUE and is currently vacant. The site is relatively level and contains approximately 14 trees over 6" caliper. The proposal is to construct a 6,000 square foot, single story office building. Access would be achieved from SW 68th Avenue and from SW Franklin Street. NOTE: This application was submitted on November 23, 1998, before the effective date of the revised Community Development Code. In conformance with ORS 227.178(3), the proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable code standards in effect at the time of submittal. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.32.250 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an Impact Study as part of the application submittal. The site has frontage on SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Neither of these streets is a collector or arterial street and therefore the cost of the street improvements is not reviewed for proportionality. A small right-of-way dedication is required as part of this proposal to provide the necessary corner radius. Due to the small size of the dedication, a calculation is not required to determine that the dedication is significantly less than proportional to the unmitigated impact of the development. Section 18.164.030.A.1 states that no development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street, and that streets within and adjacent to a development shall be improved in accordance with City standards. Therefore, streets meeting City standards must be provided in conjunction with all development. Development within the Tigard Triangle must provide street improvements as required in the Triangle Design Standards. The applicant's proposal includes the provision of street improvements along both abutting right-of-ways as described later in this decision. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build an office building. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Administrative and Professional Offices. The site is within the Mixed Use Employment (MUE) Zoning District. Section 18.67.030 lists professional and administrative services as a permitted use in the MUE zone. Therefore, the proposal complies with this Community Development Code section. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Dimensional Requirements: The MUE Zoning District standards contained in Section 18.67.050 states that the dimensional requirements of the C-G Zoning District apply to commercial development in the MUE district. The MUE Zoning District, as set forth in Section 18.67.060, also requires a maximum floor area ratio of .40 for commercial buildings. The C-G Zoning District standards contained in Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area and the average minimum lot width is 50 feet. Developments are required to provide a minimum of 15 percent landscaping and a maximum of 85% of the site may be developed with impervious surfaces. The site area is approximately 15,000 square feet and has a minimum width of approximately 100 feet. As indicated on the site plan, the applicant proposes to provide 2,359 square feet of landscaping which is equal to 15.7% of the site. The remaining 84.3% of the site will be developed in hard surfaces. The Development Code defines 'Floor Area' as: "The gross horizontal area under a roof, of all floors of a building, measured from the exterior walls, excluding vents, shafts, courts and space devoted to off-street parking." Based on this definition, the applicant has calculated the "net" floor area to be 6,000 square feet, which represents a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 40 percent. Based on these facts, the project is found to be in compliance with the above dimensional standards. Setbacks: The applicable C-G zone standards, as provided in Section 18.62.050, state that front, side, or rear yard setbacks are not required, except that 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. As noted earlier, the site is surrounded by MUE zoned property. The MUE zoning district is considered a commercial zoning district although it allows residential uses, therefore, setbacks are not required between the proposed development and adjacent MUE properties. Building Height: The dimensional standards of the MUE zone are taken from the C-G zone for commercial uses. The C-G zone, as provided in Section 19.62.050, states that the maximum height of building is 45 feet. The applicant's elevations plan indicates that the proposed building will stand approximately 18 feet high, well within the 45-foot maximum height. Therefore, this standard is met. TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including the creation of a high- quality mixed use employment area, provision of a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilization of streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in non single- family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how either the design option or performance option will be met. A Variance to these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Design Option: A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile; B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight line distance; C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. This project meets the Design Option standards, above, as follows: The site abuts public streets on two sides. Both streets will be improved in conjunction with the development of the site thereby providing both vehicle and pedestrian connections at the north and west of the site. East of the north-south connection (SW 69th), the next street is located within approximately 200 feet in full compliance with both pedestrian and vehicular connectivity standards. South of the intersection, the next street is located within approximately 950 feet. Therefore, additional pedestrian and vehicular connections are necessary to meet the standards (2 additional pedestrian and one additional vehicular connection would be required). However, since the site extends only 150 feet south of a public street, none of these additional connections would be required within the subject property. Therefore, this standard is met. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger, a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.134.050 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building Placement on Major and Minor Arterials: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. This standard does not apply because neither SW 69th Avenue nor SW Franklin Street is a Major or Minor Arterial. Building Setback: Buildings are required to be setback a minimum of 0 feet and maximum of 10 feet from the public street right-of-way. The applicant's site plan indicates that the proposed setback from both abutting right-of-ways is approximately two to three feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Front Yard Setback: This standard requires landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path be provided between a structure and a public street or access way. The applicant's plan shows landscaping will be located within the area between the building and street along SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. Therefore, this standard is met. Walkway Connection to Building Entrances: This standard states that a walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or access way. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with a scored concrete or modular paving materials. The applicant's plan indicates that the building would have its main entrance on the south wall of the building, facing the parking area and a service entrance on the east wall facing the access easement. The site plan shows a six-foot wide concrete walkway linking both entrances to the public sidewalk. Therefore, this standard is met. Parking Location and Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50 percent of the street frontage, and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The applicant's site plan shows a parking area in the south portion of the project site. The parking area is behind the building from the SW Franklin Street perspective and to the side of the building from the SW 69th Avenue perspective. Where the parking lot is to the side of the building (SW 69th Avenue), the parking lot occupies 65 feet of the 150 foot frontage (approximately 43%). The landscape plan indicates that the parking area will be screened from this frontage. The applicable screening standards are those under 18.100 because the Tigard Triangle Standards for L1 landscaping defer to these for local street screening. Section 18.100.080.E requires a continuous four-foot high screen of evergreen shrubs. The applicant's landscape plan indicates a continuous shrub screen, although the species selected will reach a maximum height of only three feet. However, since all of the parking lot landscape area is regulated as Visual Clearance Area (maximum height of any structure or landscaping is three feet), the four-foot height requirement is superseded and this standard is, therefore, met. Building Design Standards: Ground Floor Windows: This standard requires all street facing elevations within the building setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets to contain a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area used for windows, display areas or doorway openings. The elevation plans and the window area calculations provided indicate that the north, west and northwest building elevations (street facing elevations) will have over 50 percent of the ground floor wall area used for windows or doorway openings. The plans indicate that 185 square feet of window area is required on the north wall, where 187 square feet is proposed; that 144 square feet is required on the west wall, where 145 square feet is proposed; and that 106 square feet is required on the northwest wall, where 108 square feet is proposed. Based on the calculations provided, therefore, this standard is met. Building Facades: This standard requires that facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing certain features to break up the building line. It also requires that no building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The building's longest facade extends only 86' 6", thus, the requirement for a pedestrian connection through the building does not apply. The elevations provided indicate that, of the three street-facing facades (north, northwest and west), only the north- facing facade extends more than 50 feet (61.5 feet). The proposed north elevation indicates that three brick build-outs will be provided at a 22-24 foot spacing interval. The narrative explains that these details will be faced in a smaller, contrasting color brick. This will provide the required "variation in building materials" and therefore, this standard is met. Weather Protection: This standard requires that weather protection for pedestrians be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or access way. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. The proposed site plan, architectural elevations, and the applicant's narrative indicate that the building's main entrance, located on the south facade, will be provided with a four-foot facade to act as an entry cover. Weather protection along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street is only encouraged, not required, therefore the applicant's proposal meets this standard. Building Materials: This standard prohibits the use of plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding as an exterior finish for materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and on the elevation drawings that the building materials will consist of brick veneer. The concrete foundation would be revealed approximately 6 - 8 inches. Based on this information, the building materials standards are met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Roofs and Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the buildings structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. Based on the elevation plans submitted, the rooflines comply with this requirement. No false fronts or roofs are shown. Therefore, this standard is met. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and elevation drawings that the roof parapet is designed to visually screen the rooftop mounted equipment. Therefore, this standard is met. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.114 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.114.130 D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in 18.114.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant's narrative and architectural drawings indicate that one freestanding sign is proposed at the intersection of SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. The code limits the area of such signs to 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. The applicant's proposal states that the sign will have a total size less than 32 square feet. The elevation drawings also indicate a wall sign at the building entrance. The code limits wall sign size to five percent of the gross wall area of the wall face on which the sign is to be mounted. According to the elevations provided, the south facade is approximately 1,400 square feet which would allow a wall sign of about 70 square feet (1,400 x 5% = 70). The proposed wall sign is shown at approximately 15 x 3.5 feet (52.5 square feet) which is within the allowable wall sign area. Therefore, based on the above analysis, both proposed signs meet the standard. Compliance with the standard at the time of construction will be ensured through the sign permit process. Landscaping And Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3 foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Ground cover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the L- 1 landscape standard applies to setbacks on Major and Minor Arterials and this site does not have no frontage on a major or minor arterial, the L-1 standards do not apply to this site. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a local street, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Section 18.100. Compliance with the Landscaping and Screening standards of Section 18.100 is discussed later in this decision. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.120.180.a.1 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.67, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. The following have already been addressed under the TTDS and will not be addressed in this section: 18.114 (Signs) Landscaping and Screening (18.100 and 18.120) Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(a) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. Section 18.120.108.4.B. states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110.a requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features that effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant's landscape plan indicates that the parking lot will be screened with a five-foot landscape strip adjacent to SW 69th Avenue and a three-foot strip at the south and east property line. The proposed landscaping includes azaleas and rock cotoneasters adjacent to the east and west access points. Pyramidal arborvitae are added to the planting schedule along the south property line. The low lying shrubbery adjacent to the street is appropriate given the location of access points and the vision clearance standards associated with them. The addition of arborvitae on the south property line will provide the required "relative balance" between low lying and vertical shrubbery. The landscape plan indicates that four Chanticleer Pear trees (Pyrus Calleryana) will be provided in 5-foot landscape islands within the parking lot. Based on the above analysis, this standard is met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential use, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. Further, it indicates that where a parking area that provides 4-50 parking spaces abuts a residential use, the required buffer and screening width shall be ten (10) feet. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1. At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2. In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of required buffer area; and 3. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or spread with bark mulch. There area no adjacent residential uses. The property is bounded to the north and west by right-of-way and abuts commercial development to the east and vacant land to the south. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant's landscaping plan indicates that Norway Maples are proposed as street trees along SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street. The Western Garden Book describes the Norway Maple `Cleveland' (Acer platanoides) as a compact tree, about 50 feet tall. The proposed street trees are shown between the property line and the rear of the sidewalk, spaced approximately 35 feet apart. The Tigard Triangle Development Standards require street trees spreading to 25 feet to be planted 22 feet on center along local streets between the sidewalk and the street. The Triangle Development Standards supersede other standards in the Tigard Development Code. Based on the information provided by the applicant, the street tree standards have not been met. In order for staff to determine that the standards have been met, the applicant must submit a revised street tree plan for review as required by Condition of Approval #1. The plan must indicate that street trees will be placed between the sidewalk and street at a minimum spacing of 22 feet on center. The applicant must also submit written evidence provided by a landscape architect that the proposed street tree species will meet the spreading dimension specified. Therefore, compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. Visual Clearance Areas (Section 18.102): This section requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The project includes visual clearance areas at the corner of SW 69th Avenue and Franklin and at the driveway entrance off SW 69th. The applicant proposes to place a sign at the corner, within the visual clearance area. The sign elevation provided indicates that the sign would stand exactly 3 feet high in conformance with the visual clearance area standards. The shrubs proposed for the parking lot screening adjacent to SW 69th should grow to a maximum height of three feet according to the Western Garden Book, which is also in compliance with the visual clearance area standards. Therefore, based on the analysis above, the visual clearance area standards have been met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Off-Street Parking and Loading (Section 18.106) Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030.C.20 requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 350 square feet of gross floor area for Professional Offices. A maximum of 40 percent of required parking spaces can be developed as compact parking spaces. The applicant has proposed a building of approximately 6,000 gross square feet. At a rate of one space per 350 square feet, the total parking requirement for the project is, therefore, 17 spaces. The plan provides 19 parking spaces, 6 of which are proposed to be compact (32%). Therefore, this standard is met. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Based on the number of required parking spaces (19) noted above, a total of 1 bicycle parking rack space is required for this project. The applicant's narrative states that bicycle parking will be provided but the plans do not indicate its location. The site design provides adequate space for provision of bicycle parking in compliance with this standard. Condition of Approval # 2 requires that the applicant submit a revised site plan indicating that the location of the proposed bicycle parking space is as required by this standard. Therefore, compliance with this condition of approval will ensure that this criterion is met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Section 18.106.080 requires that every commercial or industrial use having floor area of 10,000 square feet or more, shall have at least one (1) off-street loading space on site. The proposed office building will have a floor area of approximately 6,000 square feet, therefore this criterion does not apply. Access Egress and Circulation Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This site has 19 parking spaces and so one access point is required. The applicant proposes two access points, one from each abutting street. The east access point is via a 24- foot easement that runs parallel to the east property line and perpendicular to SW Franklin Street. The site plan indicates a pavement width of 24 feet with 30 feet of total width provided at the entrance. Walkways: Section 18.108.050.a requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access-driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed), or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation; except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. As discussed previously in this decision, walkways have been provided in compliance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The proposed walkways must also meet the above separation standards and be designed and constructed to comply with ADA regulations. The proposed site plan indicates that the walkway will not be separated from traffic and parking by at least three feet. A minimum 6 inch vertical separation is therefore required but is not indicated on the plans. Condition of Approval #3 requires that the revised site plan indicate that a 6-inch vertical separation between walkways, and driveways and parking areas will be provided. Compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard is met. Joint Access: Section 18.108.030 states that owners of two (2) or more parcels may agree to jointly utilize the same access and egress when the combined access satisfies the combined requirements provided that satisfactory legal evidence is presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases, or contracts to establish the joint use and copies are placed on permanent file with the City. The proposed east access utilizes a joint access easement shared with the EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 development to the east on SW Franklin and 70th Avenue. However, since only one access is required and the applicant has provided an access way off SW 69th that meets City standards, proof of a joint access easement for this is not required for approval of this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking Lot Connections: Section 18.108.110.B states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The site abuts undeveloped land to the south and developed, commercial land to the east. As noted above, a shared access easement exists along the length of the east property line. This easement allows for a connection between the parking lot for the proposed project and the existing parking area located on the property to the east. Condition of Approval #4 requires that the applicant submit a copy of the easement for review and approval. Therefore, this standard is met. Tree Removal (Section 18.150.025): This section requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a Site Development Review application. The tree plan shall identify all existing trees and identify a tree preservation and mitigation program. The program shall either save existing trees over 12 inches in caliper or mitigate for the removal of such trees. The program shall identify which trees are to be removed and describe a tree protection program including specific standards and methods that will be employed during and after construction. The applicant has provided a tree report prepared by a certified arborist. The report states that all trees will be removed in order to develop the site but that only three healthy trees over 12" caliper will be removed. The report states that the total caliper inches that require mitigation totals 74" and Appendix 1 to the report lists each individual trees to be removed and mitigated. The applicant has proposed to plant approximately half of the required mitigation trees (35 caliper inches) on-site and to plant the balance (39 caliper inches) off-site, within the City, as provided in this Section. The mitigation plan is acceptable to the City provided that no required street trees, parking lot trees or landscaping and screening trees are included as part of the mitigation calculation. Upsizing of required trees may be counted toward the project's mitigation requirement. Condition of Approval #5 requires that the applicant submit a mitigation tree planting plan for the 39 caliper inches of proposed off-site mitigation trees or the applicant may pay a fee-in—lieu as provided under TMC 18.790.060.E. Therefore, compliance with the condition of approval will ensure that this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS STREETS: This site lies adjacent to SW 69th Avenue and SW Franklin Street, both of which are classified as local streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requiring 60-foot rights-of-way (ROW). At present there is 60 feet of ROW on both streets. There will be a need for additional ROW to be dedicated at the corner of 69th Avenue and Franklin Street to provide a ROW radius of 20 feet. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide this dedication. Proposed Local Improvement District(LID) Specht Development, who is proposing to develop three office buildings adjacent to 69th Avenue between Beveland Street and Dartmouth Street, has submitted a proposal to the City for the formation of a local improvement district (LID) to improve the following roadway segments: • SW 69th Avenue between Dartmouth Street and Beveland Street • SW Dartmouth Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue • SW Elmhurst Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 • SW Franklin Street between 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue, and • SW Beveland Street between 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue. The City Engineer approached the City Council on October 13, 1998 with a recommendation to prepare a preliminary engineering report to form the LID. The Council approved a motion authorizing the City Engineer to prepare this report. The engineering report is scheduled to be presented to the Council in February 1999. If Council votes to form the LID, construction of the improvements should occur during Summer 1999, with completion around September, 1999. Staff has discussed the timing aspects of the LID versus construction of the buildings in Specht's project and the City has stated that final inspections for the buildings will not be given until the public improvements associated with the LID are substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition would not prevent the issuance of a temporary occupancy permit, provided Specht has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve their building(s). Staff is of the opinion that this same condition should apply to the subject project as well. If the Council chooses not to form the LID, the applicant will be expected to complete a 3/4-street improvement on 69`h Avenue and a 1/2-street improvement on Franklin Street adjacent to their site. WATER: This site lies within the area served by the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). The applicant will need to coordinate with TVWD with respect to water service for this site. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 69`h Avenue that is south of this site. If the proposed LID is approved by the City Council, a northerly extension of this sewer line will be included in the project. If the LID is not approved, the applicant will need to extend the sewer line northerly in the street and to the far north property line as a part of their street improvements. STORM DRAINAGE: There is a 15-inch public storm sewer line in SW 69`h Avenue that drains the street toward SW Hampton Street. The applicant is proposing to direct all on-site flows to this storm line. A downstream analysis was completed by the applicant's engineer which indicates the additional storm water flows from this development will not exceed the capacity of the public storm system. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The R & 0 includes a provision that would allow the applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing a water quality facility if the applicant can demonstrate that the site is small and if a facility were to be designed, effective development of the site would be precluded. The applicant's engineer submitted an argument that states the site is limited on space and outside of the required parking areas, there is not enough room to effectively design a water quality facility. Staff finds that the engineer's argument is valid and that this particular project should qualify for the fee in-lieu. Based upon the engineer's calculations, this site will have approximately 12,390 square feet of new impervious surfaces. The current fee is $210/ESU, where an ESU is equivalent to 2,640 square feet of impervious surface. In this case, there would be approximately 4.7 ESU's on this site and the fee would be approximately $ 987.00. The fee would be payable prior to final building inspection. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Section 18.120.180.A.2 through 18.120.180.A. 17 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the following provisions and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use); 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain); 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces); and 18.120.180 (Public Transit). The following TMC sections were discussed previously in this decision and will not be addressed in this section: 18.120.180.13 (Parking); 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); 18.120.180.15 (Drainage); 18.120.180.17 (Signs); and 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's site plan indicates the location of the trash enclosure to the east of the proposed building. The applicant has provided written evidence that the franchise hauler has reviewed and approved the location as shown. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater, shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. Due to the relatively small size of the site, little or none of the existing trees, topography or natural drainage will be preserved. The location of the building on the site has been determined as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and parking has been provided as required by the Tigard Development Code. Since the applicant has met the maximum 0.40 Floor Area Ratio and provided only two more parking spaces than the minimum requirement of the code, this criterion has been met. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Privacy and Noise: Section 18.120.180.5 states that on-site uses which create noise, lights, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses. The proposed use is an office building. It is not anticipated that such a use would create noise, excessive lighting or glare. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Staff forwarded the proposal to the City of Tigard Police Department for comments. The Police Department has not provided any objections or concerns with regard to the proposal. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Access and Circulation: Section 18.120.180.11 requires access points as provided in 18.108.070. All circulation patterns within a development must be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; provisions must be made for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways if shown on adopted plans. The proposed access points are in compliance with Section 18.108.070 as discussed earlier in this decision. No City planning documents or maps indicate that any pedestrian or bicycle ways are planned for this area. Therefore, this criterion is met. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Section 18.106.020.M became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. This section requires 9 disabled parking spaces when 401-500 parking spaces are provided. The applicant has proposed a total of 19 parking spaces. For a parking lot of this size, the ADA regulations require a minimum of 1 accessible space. In addition, at least one space must be van accessible. The applicant has provided one handicap parking space according to the site plan. The space appears to be sized correctly for a van accessible space. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Final compliance will be confirmed through the building permit process. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF AND AGENCY COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: • East wall must be 1-hour construction • Trash enclosure on east side shall be 1-hour construction • A trash dumpster >_ 1.5 cu yard shall not be located under or within 5 feet of combustible construction • Locate accessible parking access aisle and route to public way, curb ramp and entrance. Conflict between Sheet #1 and grading/site plan regarding location of accessible parking. City of Tigard Property Manager/Operations Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. GTE has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Developer to place conduit per GTE specifications. Developer to pay any relocation costs. The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Sanitary Sewer Each lot shall be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer in accordance with R&O 96-44 (USA's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. If the units are to be sold individually, then a separate lateral is required for each unit. Storm Sewer Each lot should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of stormwater conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. Water Quality Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the stormwater runoff generated by new impervious surface. • There are other methods of water quality treatment for commercial sites that would be under private maintenance and would not take up additional site space. Fee in lieu is not an option since other options are available. Sensitive Area A "sensitive area" exists (may exist). Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. Staff Response: Staff has incorporated the above comments into this decision. Local knowledge of development in the area and information form information form site visits indicate that the potential sensitive area does not exists on this site. Tualatin Valley Fire & District, NW Natural Gas, US West, TCI Cable, and Tri-met were given the opportunity to review the proposal and submit comments and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: DATE OF FILING: JANUARY 7, 1999 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JANUARY 27, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 27, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 1 • I 5 January 7. 1999 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner - 1 k 4.4 ,d.1 January 7, 1999 APP O D BY: Richard Bewersdo .. DATE • Planning Manager '��/ is\curpin\mjr\sdr\sdr98-24.dec EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD OFFICE BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 17 SDR 98-0024 � A < S.W. FRANKLIN STREET > 4?4 i Ioa. 00& /-- (-D, ___\ W m / > Z Q W _ V; NEW BUILDING 3 _ Trash(an Z I 0% 6,000 sq. (t. - (I story) Z I �Endosure Z `O ® IA Z _ Z .J W Y 1. P I to I Q - a Z a W a _ � a ca 11.=7 _ �i �r VI ' —X — 0 1...04 W v I- N J , \ ' 3 compact spaces Q 4 u_. 9 standard spaces 0 1 standard spaces 3 compact spaces — [..„ ...._ ` I CASE NOES] &CASE NAME(Sl: 24 1 SITE PLAN SDR 98-0024 EXHIBIT EMPLOYERS IT MAP OVERLOAD 1 trLF ■ h�l►iC�L ■■ if I CITY of TIGARD ■ = GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ■ AN'I " VICINITY MAP DARTMOUTH ST tlii , ■ P� SDR 98-0024 li EMPLOYERS ad.•,iem:t,�r ST I . ■■ II7I ! O VERLOAD gillHERMOSO U _ 1111$,,wSUBJEC SITE FRANKLIN \ `I ■ `, ■ ••. :.,• ST 19111_1 ill Z MI II TNZAGA ST ill ■ In an S II F- ill% V \ sw - HAMPTON ST • 0 200 400 600 Feet . I V.=MO teat 4 lll . City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and III should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,(50)63 97223 ■____ (503)639-1171 http:/Nnvw.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 4, 1998; C:Imagic\MAGICO2.APR I 2S 101 AA-03901 •101 AA-04000 L X H T B CARPENTER RICHARD L POL •CK DON: I E 1834 SW 58TH#202 1834 S H#202 PORTLAND,OR 97221 P• •ND, •- • 1 25101 AA-04200 2S1 01 AA-04300 POLLOCK DONALD E& LANDMARK FORD INC 1834 SW 58TH#202 PO BOX 23970 PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S1 01 AA-04500 101M-05200 LOUIE RICHARD C AND LA • ARK FO'• IC 12395 SW 68TH PO BO 0 TIGARD,OR 97223 T -•-D,OR • :1 25101 AA-05500 101 AA-05700 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K COR S J•, S L&CORA K PO BOX 23970 PO BO• '• 0 TIGARD,OR 97281 T ►•RD,OR • •:1 2S1 O1 AA-07600 2S 101 AA-07700 WILHELM MICHAEL W CHORUBY PAUL N 12540 SW 68TH AVE 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 AA-08100 25101 AA-08200 FUEGY ALLEN AND RAYMOND ROTH JACOB TIMOTHY JR&THERESA 12480 SW 68TH PKWY SUITE A 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08300 2S11 •-08301 ROTH J T JR&THERESA ROTH JA •OTHY JR&THERESA 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 12600 2N• •VE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 972 " 2S11 • •-08500 2S101AA-08600 ROTH J ' J : HERESA PEIRCE STEPHEN W AND 12600 D AVE STE 200 12525 SW 68TH ARD,OR 9 • 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 •-08700 2S101AA-08800 ROTH J R ERESA ROTH J T JR&THERESA 12600 S • .D AVE STE 200 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 TI •D,OR 9 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 AA-09100 2S 101 AA-09101 POLLOCK DONALD E KINDRICK ALFRED F&DIANNE M 1834 SW 58TH STE 202 12560 SW 70TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 S 2),i c/F- (c l O ,4 2S101AA-09108 2S101AA-09700 • PORTER DENISE& DANA MARK R 7991 SW MOHAWK ST 12585 SW 68TH AVE TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 01AA-09800 - 11AD-00800 ROT T - &THERESA POLLS K I s 1ALD E 1260' 72ND AVE STE 200 1834 :TH#202 ARD,O' '7223 P:-TLAND, :- 97221 R & W PARTNERS 12600 SW 72ND AVENUE, SUITE 200 TIGARD OR 97223 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 9 2.9 7 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard-Planning • ❑ Tearsheet Notice SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]98-0024 13 J_?.5 SW Ha 11 Blvd. >EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD< �Ti and Oregon 97?..?.3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, Tigard single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the •Account s Payable southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employ- ment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION major transportation facilities,to provide for major retail goods and ser- vices accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services STATE OF OREGON, )ss. accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code I, Kathy Snyder Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18. 96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, being first duly sworn, depose and say,that I am the Advertising 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-Tua lat i n rI'a.rles a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 , 1---•- T _ and 193.020; published at Ticra rd in the , r---, — aforesaid county and state; that the wmwvrM�r"^J ' I IIn� SDP 9fi-00 24/FmpJnyer s Overload 1 I � 11 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the _ `� entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and -. -----„____ I I I r4 consecutive in the following issues: . , E..._1 ; January 7 , 1999 I ; ; '-LYr' i3G--I ' - � '_i r I SITE l I !,11—R `1� i ko,,Icts ,......, -,A.114 Subscribed and sworn to bef me this?th� v�a of JantLar.y, 1999 L I , ' 7 \ 1 1 s Notary gAlic for Oregon - My Commission Expires: ti I rN AFFIDAVIT ' `\\ Iii The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Division,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on January 20, 1999. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten(10)days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M.,January 20,1999. TT9297-Publish January 7, 1999. I-1 ow CITY of TIGARD ---1 "- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM NOTIFICATION AREA MAP (250) ST SDR 98-0024 t 2S1°>�U52°° EMPLOYERS ' .. 0111110391 Cr) 251101AA0400(� 2S101AA05500 Lil 25101111105700 ¢OVERLOAD SUBJEC gsmu104200 ''RTC,. SITE L 0 . ` A NKLI J ST \"` ,08301 2S101AA I di "'"N' 101AA08200 25101111109100 i \\. t: 01111108 10 0111110 10 LAND ST , 01111108710 , , 25101111108 41iii �l I ' 08800 2S101AA09101 0111110 10 A '1011111091 . MA- 1 0 N Mini IV 0 200 400 2S101A000810 1"e`'1010°` 1GA ST ' City of Tigard 11111111,' . CID 1 Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division 131.25 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6391171 : 111111 http://www.d.tigartor.us Community Development Plot date:Dec 4, 1998;C:ImagiclMAGICO2.APR 5D pLGy�-' (06. icF 2S101AA-03901 -101AA-04000 CARPENTER RICHARD L POL •CK DON:�D 1;534 SW 58TH#202 1834 S H#202 PORTLAND,OR 97221 P•' AND, •' • 1 • 2S101AA-04200 2S101AA-04300 POLLOCK DONALD E& LANDMARK FORD INC 1834 SW 58TH#202 PO BOX 23970 PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S101AA-04500 101AA-05200 LOUIE RICHARD C AND LA c• ARK FO'P IC 12395 SW 68TH PO BO ••• 0 TIGARD,OR 97223 T .•-D,OR • .:1 2S101AA-05500 -101AA-05700 CORLISS JAMES L&CORA K COR S J• S L&CORA K PO BOX 23970 PO BO. 't70 TIGARD,OR 97281 T .•RD,OR 9 -:1 2S101AA-07600 2S101AA-07700 WILHELM MICHAEL W CHORUBY PAUL N 12540 SW 68TH AVE 12520 SW 68TH AVE#A TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08100 2S101AA-08200 FUEGY ALLEN AND RAYMOND ROTH JACOB TIMOTHY JR&THERESA 12480 SW 68TH PKWY SUITE A 12600 SW 72ND AVE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-08300 2S11 :•-08301 ROTH J T JR&THERESA ROTH JA :: •OTHY JR&THERESA 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 12600 2N• •VE#200 TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 9722 2S10 • •-08500 2S101AA-08600 ROTH J ' J' : HERESA PEIRCE STEPHEN W AND 12600 .•1 D AVE STE 200 12525 SW 68TH ARD,OR 9 • 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101• •-08700 2S101AA-08800 ROTH J R : HERESA ROTH J T JR&THERESA 12600 S • D AVE STE 200 12600 SW 72ND AVE STE 200 TI -D,OR 9 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101AA-09100 2S101AA-09101 POLLOCK DONALD E KINDRICK ALFRED F&DIANNE M 1834 SW 58TH STE 202 12560 SW 70TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 SDK CcierS oaf 2S101AA-09108 2S101AA-09700 PORTER DENISE& DANA MARK R 7391 SW MOHAWK ST 12585 SW 68TH AVE TUALATIN,OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 01AA-09800 -•01AD-00800 ROT T • &THERESA POLLS K P% 1ALD E 1260s 72ND AVE STE 200 1834 :TH#202 ARD,O' '7223 P.-TLAND, :' 97221 R & W PARTNERS 12600 SW 72ND AVENUE, SUITE 200 TIGARD OR 97223 APPLICANT MATERIALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 44*,. APPLICATION CITY Of TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: /1J /20-6 ETL7S DATE OF PRE-APP.: /O/Z Property Address/Location(s): 5 Lii- t°1 1?-.- FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2.S 1 1 AA-2'3 D0 Case No.(s): -CiVe 0.2 y Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: 9 ?- - //O/5 Site Size: \ S, b CO 16 Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': J • \ • ■ 0-114 //../7.=7 15),/Date: Address: 1 2.. O S L ']2 *Zoo Phone: 2.-1039 City: �;c �� 0 2. Zip: 91 2:2:2> Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant': 5 G w•c Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: City: Zip: CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Rev.4/21/97 i:\curpin\masters\sdra doc must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: II [3-' Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization �Gve_ k2 � f Co•InSfru(t. v� cyc S ✓n l� ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed c ❑ Site/Plot Plan 5-friel -(14‘t VI l d w ✓ 41 (#of copies based on pre-app check list) �.100r�X - Cv O DO + 13 Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8',/2"x 111 Ey-Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) I y Construction Cost Estimate jM0-0-0, ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑' Filing Fee (Under 3100.000) $ 800.00 (S100.000-5999.999� � 60O.00 (Si Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+55 1 510.000) List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NPit APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL_ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • 11 . - •..• - ii-a• K. • •:r 1 • .• . . - 1 • :�• 101. 11 •1 1 . 11 . •.: • t.. 1 :•• • • •11 ••1 y ••1 1a ••ti property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this - ' day of /J/7?/ r- . 19 !0 All . it" / ..Alik,(/214.11,4/11 AUNIMIIIIe Owner's Si•nature rJ .--r. c24.714- t-A R, Owner's Signature —r-cli Gac_, A. A 2"i}H Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 - CITY OF TIGARD Community®eveCopment Shaping (Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION I 120 DAYS =4/3/99 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 98-0024 FILE TITLE: EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD APPLICANT(S): J. T. Roth, Jr. OWNER(S): R & W Partners Attn: Tim Roth 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, #200 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, #200 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-2639 REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 6,000 square foot, single-story office building. LOCATION: 12540 SW 69th Avenue; WCTM 2S101 AA, Tax Lot 08300. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin Street and SW 69th Avenue within the Tigard Triangle. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to create a mixed use employment district to provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities, to provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.67, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: THURSDAY DECEMBER 17,1998 K STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: _ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM_ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM_ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION VICINITY MAP K LANDSCAPE PLAN X NARRATIVE K SITE PLAN X TREE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY X ARBORIST REPORT X OTHER STORM WATER QUALITY REPORT X STAFF CONTACT: M. J. Roberts. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 315 SDR 98-0024 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS rid„,14 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 4, 1998 Mr. J. T. Roth, Jr. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, #200 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal (Employers Overload) - SDR 98-0024 Dear Mr. Roth: This letter is to inform you that your application for Site Development Review (City file reference: SDR 98-0024) is considered complete and has been accepted by the Planning Division. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, M. J. Roberts & -- Associate Planner i s\c u rp I n\rnj r\s d r\s d r98-24.c m p c: SDR 98-0024 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 \CG' G fp(s caller of Transmiflal Date: Nov. 20, 1998 To: MJR Project: SW Franklin & 69th - Employers Overload Building Company: City of Tigard Phone: 639-4171 Fax: We are sending you: shop drawings correspondence specs invoices proposals copy of letter change order plans contract x other ****************************************************************************** Copies Date Ref# Description ****************************************************************************** 1 11-20-98 Site Development Review Application 4 pages Statutory Warranty Deed 5 pages 10-28-98 Comm. Develp. Depart. Applicat. Checklist 10 pages 10-29-98 Pre-App. Conference notes 5 pages 10-29-98 Pre App. Conference Notes-Engineering Section 1 page 10-16-98 Affidavit of mailing 1 page 10-16-98 Affidavit of Posting Notice 1 page Reduced copy of Posting Notice 10 pages Mailing list 19 pages 10-16-98 Copies of letters mailed to property owners 1 page 10-30-98 Sign-up form for public hearing 18 copies 11-20-98 PDW Narritive 18 copies 81/2x 11 site map 18 copies 11-20-98 JTRoth Narrative 18 copies Compass Engineer Storm water Quality 18 copies Compass Engineer Impact Study 18 copies Pride Disposal Pride Disposal approval letter 05 copies Carlson Testing Soils Report(copies for-engineering,building,plan check,extras) 18 copies Gen. Tree Service Arborist Tree report 18 sets(5 pages each) Blue Print Drawings (including site plan,landscaping,grading,floor plan,elevations) 18 copies Compass Engineer Grading Plan Signe,. d��/� . Date: /( � — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard,Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — • SIAI E OF OREGON l SS Jnty of Washington f •-�� I, Jerry $nt of Assess- ment and�y attOn an _111; io County Clerk for z icteogra rtify that the withir in�LLtr § OI • p eceived and rent rd 1 f 4 k 6rd of said county, * � wi ; ,j • (j'ed Nana n Director of A,siOsertlitif' E1( axation,Ex- 'tiffloipy pnpl Clerk Doc : 98096225 Rect: 215971 306.00 08/31/1998 03: 47: 14pm VP'n ti 10.39 J.T.ROTH CO F STRUCTION, INC. /MP. ep, .r �S A,M E p r c • 4 , 1' rrs'ny.-Eft\ 3° STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED a g Zo J. T. ROTH, JR., THERESA ROTH, KENNETH L. WAYMIRE AND ROBERTA A. WAYMIRE AS IT) PARf'VFS T AND TT; ANTI R & W PAR'[NRPS AR 'M PARCFTS III IV AND V. ,Grantor, Zs6 conveys and warrants to J J. T. ROTH, JR. AND'THERESA ROTH. HUSBAND AND WIFE ,Grantee, the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances,except as specifically set forth herein: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO: `o This property is free of liens and encumbrances,EXCEPT: 1998/99 TAXES A LIEN NOT YET PAYABLE; g CITY LIENS; SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO: E aci g c THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING 2 N THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH Go THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOF VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The true consideration for this conveyance is$ 250.000.00 (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030) Dated this 17THday of JULY 19 98 .1 W THERESA SIT -AT _, JR. Aft R & W PARTNERS J. T. BOTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. B MAINE= JR. PRESIDENT WA CONS • C:J1'M,,O�N COMPANY �•-iF/_t1 , • l• Ceti. .a t I',ul�> / ROBERTA A. V IRE STATE OF OREGON County of WASHINGTON )5s. *J. T. ROTH CONSTRUCTION, INC., BOTH AS PARTNERS tl �f� OF R & W PARTNERS On this I.3 day of 71 g&,ST j , 19 `v ,before me appearedKENNETH L. WAYMIRE AS PRESIDENT OF WAVERLY**and J. T. ROTH. JR. AS PRESIDEN OF * both to me personally known, who being duly sworn,did say that he,the saidKENNETH L. WAYMIRE AS PRESIDENT OF WAVERLY ** is the PARTNER Rent,and he,the said J. T. ROTH, JR. AS PRES IDENT OF * is the PARTNER [fly of R & W PARTNERS the within named Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and KENNETH L. WAYMIRE AS PRESIDENT OFarid J. T. ROTH JR. • 'RESIDENT OF * acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation IN TESTIMONY WHERE, I FF hahave�hSereunto set y '' • and a i ed my officia seal the day and ye,- last above written. **CONS • Sl n P•• R oP>:IarLsEa `/ S1[/ Ki0• `' UNDA L MC GEfTIGAN ' NOTIAI'PUBLIC-OREGON Nota, Public for Oregon. COMMISSION No,061109 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES fFES,,,as,2001 My ommission expires? ' Title Order No. £7 l(Yq 9 Escrow No. 98051451 THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE After recording return to: 1. WASHINGTON COUNTY J. T. ROTH. JR. +NEI REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 12600 SW 72nd Ste 200 lD•�e Tigard, OR 97223 �. TE Name,Address,Zip r y TEE PAM Until a change Is requested all tax statement shall be sent to the following address. J. T. ROTH. JR. 12600 SW 72nd Ste 200 Tigard. OR 97223 Name,Address,Zip EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I: Parcel 2, PARTITION PLAT NO. 1996-024, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH easements for ingress and egress as described in Documents recorded September 28, 1995 as Fee;, lo. 95069649 and September 28, 1995 as Fee No. 95069653 and easement for driveway purposes described in Document recorded January 17, 1997 as Fee No. 97005545. PARCEL II: Lots 15 and 16, Block 29, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. PARCEL III: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 29, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. PARCEL IV: Lot 13-14, inclusive, Block 29,WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. PARCEL V: Lot 33-34, inclusive, Block 29,WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. 3 • V ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOSED BY ACTUAL SURVEY ' .%SI f. 8 1 C. I First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon _ _ An assumed business name Of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503) 222-3651 2, S1OlA - 12 33 -714c. 33 - co. 12 33 -I 41-51 r 6401 12 T 33 22 " - (0 - - (D l3 32 -1 I J- 25 Ac 233 p+ 3P a 13 13 32 1.-. , 14 ad X00 14 2-2 3 I y 14 2-3 31 -{ (: E- 14 `�"T 31 R- - 9 15 30 _ - - + 30 - " 15 30 . ~.24005 t 30 9 16 - 29 + —Z9 - _ 16 - 29 i <' 1- 16 4- 29 9 17 28 17 28 17 28 i F 17 + 28 A I8 27 — 16 27 18 27 IB 27 2 ^ 'ir T I I I T T T 1 ( 4 + I r - 7 I 1 T T r -I I- T T T T T T - 1 4200 4300 4500 1 z 56 AC. • AC I 17 AC I I -� 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I --I P 1 r� r 'r> 1�h x . r , , . . 1 1 . . . , L (A 1S.W. FRANKLIN STREET": 1 D i 7 I %I I I I r ,237 x0 l u l:a x� 271x7 1 t!r r 1 9100 m 1 1 8300 Ot 8200 I Glop_---79001 6700 rn LS/AC .46 A2. w+a _19 AG. .13 AC. .5Odc. 1 1 /53 AC. I O I I 2 3 41 1 5 6 7 8 $I 2 3 4 m O. 6 7 8 I i 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 6 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8P I / 1 II 1 I I 4 (C. 20,533 J .i41 J. - 1 11- 1 J. J. l S l 1 .. I 1 l l 1 1 J. 1 + 1 1 I �.-� / q 9 36 36 i7700 T 7800 F 9 {- 36 I / q 10 35 35 :l4 AG .75 AC 10 35 - 1 (31 •/ — I I- I + q 11 34 II 8500 - I 11 34 I + 34 �--. % .S 12 t 33 - - 12 - J2 4c;� Z 1 12 33 ( F 12 + 33 /�a 13 3}O 32 - 819 -:86 0 : 13 2 8 32 1 a� F 13 2+7 32 I 7; S.W. 14 31 1 „7600 31 F 14 + 31 t STREET / 1S t 30 ` ea I 30 .34 AG 30 15 30 2 STREET • y I t - ./r 'I` 29 16 29 ~ 16 + 29 ;� ,� ( 9108 - - +- + ■ !00.07 I IW as 1 17 28 7100 • .7�AG .*�0 454C. "' 9800 I r970�- 1 - — 1 H 100.4c. - 5 1 I 1 \ 18 27 18 + 27 T - , .4/dC. 1 I.I/AC ■ I r r I j -F T T T t T T T •` 1 I J 1 1 19 20 21 72 23 24 25 ; J 6 0 2 I9 zfl 21 221 73 24 25 261 s;. 21 221 124 25 2� 1 2 I I ; I 11-1 •r 1 G rl I 1T :: �tD so':•'•4,'I43 126�43/ltE'lri'l[f 123^ 30 1 I I k. b .=iyl3 yl(lffi itt1131 ° 434,,,. Lam.lu.l23.lie+ -l- 2.s'yzs- �■ 39/904cc v00220 - �iO035 i.S«rii�� ISw GONZAGA 57.1 VAC.7t01 1 F Q IT-50103 la-23327 - I r.c nty3-Imm } - — SEE MAP- — - - -1 r (- r rcCh Ve- Nov. 20, 1998 City of Tigard Applicant/Owner: J.T. Roth, Jr. 13125 SW Hall Theresa A. Roth Tigard, Or. 97223 12600 SW 72nd# 200 Attn: Planning Dept. Tigard, Or. 97223 RE: Site Design Review—Employers Overload Building Tax lot 8300 (S.W. 69th and Franklin) NARRATIVE: Application for a Site Development review for the development and construction of a • commercial office building located at S.W. 69`h and Franklin. The following criteria addresses the Tigard Triangle Standards as well as the relevant development codes. Chapter 18.67- MUE Zoning: The designed use of the proposed improvements is office commercial which is consistent with this zoning. More specifically, as it is called out in chapter 18.67.030, the category would be classified as "Professional and Administrative Services". -The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) has been addressed on the site plan submittal, total area of land is 15,000 s.f. and total area of improvements is 6,000 s.f., or the maximum 40% allowable. 18.67.070 Design Standards A. -Street Connectivity: The standard option applied to this site is the Design Option whereas access to the site, off S.W. 69th, is approx. 100' from a local thru-street, S.W. Franklin. This will satisfy the 660 feet for a public street as well as the 330 feet for a pedestrian connection. B. —Site Design Standard: The total area of land being proposed for development is less than 1 acres so a phased development plan is not required. 1. Building Placement: The frontage streets for this site are S.W. 69`h and S.W. Franklin, both defined as "Local Streets"consequently the requirement of the building to "occupy a min. 50% along Major and Minor Arterial Streets"does not apply. The building has been located at the street intersection even though neither street is a major or minor arterial. 2. Building setback: The placement of the building from a public street is within the 0 to 10 setback. (see site plan) 3. Front yard setback design: A hard-surfaced pedestrian path has been provided between the structure and public streets. Landscaping has been provided between the structure and the public street, refer to section "F. Landscaping and Screening"of the Standards for definition of landscape requirements, also as is addressed in this Narrative. (see landscape plan submitted with this application) 4. Walkway connection to building entrance: A six (6) foot walk has been provided between the building entrance and a public street (street sidewalks). (see site plan) 5. Parking location and landscape design: Parking is located on the side of the structure. Parking does not exceed 50%of the street frontage and is screened behind a landscaped area of 5' or greater. (see site plan) C. -Building Design Standards: 1. Ground floor windows: The minimum 50% ground floor window area has been met. (see calculations on page 5 of the architectural drawings) 2. Building facades: The building façade facing the public streets (S.W. 69th & SW Franklin) are 73' and 86' (respectively) in length and is broken with a vertical columns of a brick veneer smaller in size and darker in color than that of the body brick/block. This complies with sub-section "(a) a variation in building materials". Since the façade does not exceed 300' a pedestrian connection is not required. 3. Weather protection: The storefront entrance is protected with a 4' façade to provide the necessary weather protection at the main building entrance. 4. Building Materials: Exterior building materials for this structure are a brick veneer, no restricted materials (per standards) are being used. The structured foundation is concrete and finish floor is set at an elevation consistent with the existing topography grade, after landscaping along the foundation the exposure should be 6 to 8 inches. 5. Roofs and roof lines: The roof parapet is a continuation of the building face, consequently the materials are the same as the building. 6. Roof-mounted equipment: The roof parapet is designed to visually screen the roof top mounted equipment. D. —Signs: • The proposed project is a non-residential development within a MUE zoning, consequently the signage requirements for this project (see attached sign design) comply with the C-P zoning found in chapter 18.114.130—D. *The site sign is a freestanding multifaced sign *The height does not exceed 10" *The total sq. footage is less than 32 s.f. *The sign is to be located at the intersection corner of the site 2 F. Landscaping and Screening: Since this project fronts two local streets the landscaping design follows the requirements defined in chapter 18.100. In addition, since the street frontage is not a major or minor collector the areas of building setbacks will landscape to the L-2 standards. 18.96 - Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions. *The frontage streets to this project, S.W. 69th and SW Franklin, are not singled out in the development codes as requiring any special setbacks from centerline. *Adjacent properties to the east and south are zoned MUE and are currently being used as commercial, properties to the north and west are dedicated public streets. Therefore, there are no special setbacks required for this site. 18.98 - Building Height Limitations: Exceptions *The building height (two story building) does not exceed the maximum height of 75' for non-residential buildings therefore this project complies. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening *see Landscaping and Screening discussed earlier in this narrative. *see Landscape plan, page 2, of blue print drawings submitted with application. *see Tree Plan submitted with application. *since this is a commercial use and adjacent properties are same, no special buffering of the property lines is required. 18.102 Visual Clearance Areas *This site is located at a street intersection and the building design has provided for a "line-of-sight" setback even though the setback requirements defined in the Triangle Standards would over-ride. 18.106 —Off-Street and Loading Requirements *Parking design and data are noted on page 1 of blue print drawings submitted with this application. *Bicycle parking is noted on page 1 of blue print drawings. 18.108—Access, Egress, and Circulation *see Site Plan, page 1 of blue print drawings, submitted with this application. 18.114—Signs *see Signs discussed earlier in this narrative. 18.116—Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables *see Site Plan, page 1 of blue print drawings, submitted with this application. *see Pride Disposal letter addressing enclosure, submitted with this application. 3 :-4- 11!06/98 13:22 'Li'5U3 U2 179 PRIDE DISPuS:►L 169u2ruu3 JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Nov 5 ' 11 :04 P. 01/02 • 3axmeno From: Tim Roth To: I.cruty Iliva IT. Roth Construction, Inc. Company; Pride Disposal 12600 S.W. 72'td suite 200 Phone#: 625-6177 Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 6q5-6179 CCB#31700 503/639-2639 Date: _Nov. 5 19 98 . 503/624-0239 fax Total pages (including cover) 2 , r RE: Proposed development E} Comer of S.W. 69th and Franklin Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Her is [4:t' As a requirement of the City of Tigard, I am contacting our requesting that you review the q Y by e9 S Y nttw.hctl aito iilnu null yiuvIilc tuc with wtittt:u uitinuvalz tvgartltug die luctuluu of my waste and recycling containers/enclosure. I propose to construct an enclosure approx. 7'x 10' to enclose both the waste as well as recycling containers (canisters on wheels). This is per a conversation we had within the last couple of weeks. I will be constructing this building for a"build to suit"tenant who will own and occupy the complete space and assures me that 1 garbage and 2 recycling canisters are adequate for his needs. I believe that 10' should provide the needed width to contain the 3 canisters. The tenant would be rolling the canisters to the interior sidewalk which cau be accessed by your trucks dlrvcrly off3-W. Fuwkllu.tun] lltc wove ttt;t:ca3 wad v.uuhl ltiuvitlo au exit uu S.W. 69th (Lu (l3 west) or S.W. 68th(to the east) Please respond in writing as soon as possible so that I may complete my application for submitt: .=. Oa 41.4 of : ''Jr. r (1 " CO- 9(1 /P)194/ri �1 i .7 Rol( ��t,,--�-- p-i��. R-ez>ye--� ' • /.5 P/c t c OA- (,JOt Fr 11/O8/98 13:25 'tT5O Fa:1:5036240239 PRIDE DISPOSAL [djOU3/009 JT ROTH CONST Nov 5 '98 11 :05 P.02/02 S vJ . ZAJ`4 -L 1 NS 1 F °' • 14 -._'-- i n, t i_ i i._,t•• I,f_ L. ( . —7- . '. ., , ; 7:7"---7-7.---77-77,I04) • 0 C . ,:%---"......\ ' ' _ ' : . • . -4' 7 ' ^` •• . ..* .�. . / I ; ' \. ..\, , Q‘,„ ! IL.' . `11(r. ,.., Q-- - o . . 8.. , i i I\I T-1-•-7 . .;:�. i 11..klit•\( irk- '`464 . 040,5 opt. •-•.• 21- • V r/Y - • , ` • ,' it ,.. I vet► 0 • ti.,,i4 I 410) 1 J _ ey1 ,;ve-i r. 6.tc:c (,Ba st'<(,r _k..\ - - ` is-(-". v h .1 r "6.-1 ,-- -. ' - ..--- ,41111 . ' r ) - WI . . , •.•.. rt. ' P. • ______. .........._ . _ 1 u,.-\- i . ..) V lief;. • �iOAL . .......d.54*. e.""'";',e ml Tire Service Professional bee, shrub and turf care programs since 1924 November 19, 1998 Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction, Inc 12600 SW 72nd Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Tree Plan for building lot 8300 located at the southeast corner of SW Franklin and SW 69th Ave. Definition of Assignment - Prepare a Tree Plan as defined by the municipal code of the city of Tigard #18.150.025 for the lot off the southeast corner of the intersection of SW Franklin and SW 69th St. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions - The tree survey enclosed shows the placement of the trees on site. The method of pacing off distances was used to place the location of the trees on the survey. Actual placement of the trees on site may vary slightly. The diameter measurement of the trees where measured and recorded as shown in the inventory found in appendix#1 General Tree and Field Conditions - The inventory(Appendix#1) shows that the majority of the trees are less than 12 inches in diameter. Four trees have a caliper of greater than 12". One of the four trees is an older fir tree (#5) that is growing so close to Oak tree#4 that it has never fully developed. The bark indicates that it is a very old tree that is on the verge of death. It is a tree that is not adding any benefit to the environment as it has very few branches that have any green foliage. The tree is only about 15 feet tall and has a significant amount of deadwood. The total sum of caliper inches of the trees over 12 inches not counting the above-mentioned Douglas Fir, is 74 inches. Discussion- All trees on the property are to be removed to develop the site. Given that there are only three, healthy trees that have a caliper greater than 12 inches, only the size of those trees needs to be mitigated. The total caliper size of these three trees equals 74 inches. According to the code requirement, there needs to be one to one replacements of caliper inches for those trees over 12 inches caliper. The replacement inches can be PO Box 2049 • Clackamas, Oregon 97015 • 503 • 656 • 2656 planted on site, off site within the city of Tigard boundaries or a sum paid to the city tree's fund to compensate for the lost of the caliper inches. Summation- It is the intention of the developer to plant enough trees on site and within the boundaries of the city of Tigard to compensate for the lost caliper inches. The landscape plan shows that the following trees are to be planted as part of the landscape for this site. Seven Cleveland Maples (Ater platanoides `Cleveland'), 3" caliper. Four Chanticleer Pears (Pyrus calleryana `Chanticleer'), 2" caliper. Two Pagoda Dogwoods(Corpus alternifolia), 2" caliper. Total caliper inches of the above trees equals 35". The remaining balance to be mitigated (39 caliper inches) will be planted by the applicant within the boundaries of the city of Tigard. Conclusion- The above Tree Plan shows that the development of the property on the southeast corner of SW Franklin and SW 69'h Ave. meets the requirements for the mitigation of the removed trees from the site. If you require any additional information, please call. Sincerely, �vu.uc.L / G�.0-cL�cLi1tJ Terrence P. Flanagan Certified Arborist #PN-0120 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists • APPENDIX# 1 INVENTORY OF TREES AT THE J.T. ROTH DEVELOPMENT SITE ON SW 69TH AVE. AND SW FRANKLIN ST. 11-Nov-98 Tree# Species Condition Size-DBH Comments Tree# 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii Very Good 33" Tree#2 Prunus sp. Fair 6" Tree#3 Prunus sp. Fair 6" Tree#4 Quercus garryana Very Good 19.2" Tree# 5 Pseudotsuga menziesii Very Poor 12.8" Stunted, —15 feet tall, tree is almost dead nneds to be removed Tree#6 Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor 10.2" Thin canopy Tree#7 Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor 6.7" Stunted growth Tree# 8 Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor 8.4" Stunted growth. broken top at — 20' Tree# 9 Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair 22" Double top, one top broken out, large leader is dead Tree# 10 Quercus garryana Good 10.3" Tree# 11 Quercus garryana Good 11" Broken branches in canopy Tree# 12 Quercus garryana Good 10.6" Basal scar, 20% circumference Tree# 13 Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair 11.5" Stunted growth Tree# 14 Salix sp. Fair 10.9" Broken main stem,root suckers Tree# 15 Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair 9.4" Stunted growth Tree# 16 Prunus sp. Good 11.6" Tree# 17 Prunus sp. Good 6.4" Page 1 TREE SURVEY Sc/ti-P. LOT # 8300, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SW 69111 AND SW FRANKLIN St t) r AY - - • 0 0 0 0(4 0' oa. 14 /3 0 5 01 0.6 010 II I _ r PDW DESIGN * 13600 SE '1'AY1LOR C.T. * PORTLAN:D ':± .. '97233 . 5031 262-8016 * FAX 5031267-1892 <: `t'::,.;: . •••, • • NOVEMBER 20,t1* : :F ' ` '. - CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DEPT, 13125 SW HALL SLVD, TIGARD, OR. 97x3.: : 't; ' RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION • ` 1 8LK 29 WEST PORI: HEIGHT WASH. CO. : -• , ' , TAX LOT 6300 . . ,t CLEAR SIRS : , • . .• , .• IRS .• THIS PROJECT WILL INCLUDE THE SIU DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRICTION OF 4!. 8,400 SCI.FT. •f BUILDING FOR USE AS A OFFICE BUILDING. THIS SITE IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED:WITH NO EXI,S'TING ! , • BUILDINGS. :. ;. 1. FLOOR AREA RATIO: !' • • 40%OF SITE SIZE 16;OQ0 6,000.0) SQ. FT. tY. '` • , TOTAL BUILDING AREA '•1':.,,• ':.• FIRST FLOOD AREA 6,000: SQ. FT. s ' '•� ` • • • r; , 2. THE PROJECTEDCOST ESTIMATE FOR THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION;IS BASED Mf:; :.QGI;A,SQ. Fly • , FOR THE BUILDING SHELL ARFA ' 6,000 SQ. FT. AT$68;00==. --___...-_... }i Q$ Q.S # ;� : f, • • :,s i PLEASE CALL,ME AT 252•43015 OR TIM ROT H AT 639-2639 IF YOU HAVE ANY QI.ESTIQly;. ..1,:.•:-%•1!: •'I • ` i ...i .: • RESPECTFULLY SSI MI'T`I-ED, t . PETER WASCH:. •• • :•• i • • . • :r . . C: \4287\42B7topo.dwg Thu No 1 10: 44: 19 1998 BARBARA I 6 ■ = a ! : ■ L ■■ 3 , 11 r;1•J■. MOIL— ! ,!11■•1u11• MIME � • MI= I. Elli■ Malin ■ ��`�II M ■ Q Iii I A II•A I II ¢ > ,,1 t j sumseq.9I_ ---�-- _ ,, �.,�1.. I -__ �''' .1;0. ter `. �t '- �' Isy L. M i11 t � - . I - 1, i , ( 0 .iii �,.� 14 ; -çi,� 1 .new I M /I;i I I ' ■ -a " --T ` °` I I E 5 i • •••• ,.D.•YMOp i'' —ZI ii�1��o1�ill�l ;ii�i�Sjl 0111 ..° iiit1 I {II 1411 pi! g II s 1 .11 ; 3 1 ' , III Q iltA �iil ' i 111 I o 1I 111 ' I' � � � , i iI i 71. 3, II N ".sy o COMPASS s"rORniWA"rca QUALITY CORPORATION � W 4\ .1� E -- - - TAX LO"F 8300 s This report is submitted as a request for an exception to the requirement for the construction of a water quality facility for the development of Tax Lot 8300. The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) requires that: A water quality facility shall be constructed unless, in the judgement of the Agency or City,any of the following conditions exists: 1. The site topography or soils makes it impractical, or ineffective to construct an on-site facility. 2. The site is small compared to the development plan.and the loss of area for the on-site facility would preclude the effective development. 3. There is a more effective regional site within the sub-basin that was designed to incorporate the development or is near vicinity with the capacity to treat the site. 4. The development is for the construction of one or Iwo family(duplex)dwellings on existing lots of records. . A preliminary site investigation by Carlson Testing. Inc..dated February 2. 1996. indicates that the soils are not conducive to retention storm water disposal. This precludes the opportunity for infiltration. This commercial property is small,about the size of one large duplex lot. Total site(118300)15,001)sq. ft. 0.3-I acres Landscape 2.610 sq. ft. Impervious area 12.390 sq. ft. Treatment volume required (12,390 sq. 11.)(.36 in/12 in/ft.)= 372 cubic ft. The site layout, existing joint access casements and existing property shape precludes an opportunity to accommodate this facility. Preliminary calculations for sizing a water quality swale are as follows: Water Quality Q=CIA = (12.390 sq. ftj(.90)+(2.610 sq. fL)(0.30) 1 5.00() (0.36 in/)(15.000) = 0.025 cfs • (4 hrs)(43,560) • USA swale minimums. 4 ft. minimum bottom \\idth 4:1 minimum side slopes 100 ft. minimum length 1.5%minimum slope 0.25 mannings'n' The resulting area requirements for a swale facility assuming a minimum one foot depth.. (12ft.)(100) = 1.200 sq. ft. • The land required for water quality facilities to meet the 65%phosphorus removal standards is not available that .would allow development of the proposed building and associated parking. As a result, I recommend a partial fee-in-lieu for this development. Prepared by Bruce D. Goldson, P.E. Compass Engineering N:\CLER\FINAL\working\t I.98I4287Nov.I9.doc COMPASS IMPACT STUDY ••! • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, being duly sworn, depose and say that on /é , 19 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 5, i J. 6, 9=` �i. ,rci , j;7 —J Off . a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 7/7 7 with postage prepaid thereon. • Si•"ature .. (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 1.to*I day of Oat t � , 19 qS- OFFICIAL SEAL 1 M? . THERESA ROTH NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON N'.. Fi E I.,,OREGON Ci i Lei. f2U.G o388 My Commission Expires: Q 1301 Z� MY COM:SS:O i EXPIRES AUG 30,2000 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) !NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 'TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: I Name of Applicant/Owner: Address or General Location of Subject Property: Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): J h:Io ntpatt'ymastersudmadmst AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, tJ• 7.7 \IA • , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed / 0-47“C. 6 /c - affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) t.c La 74 8300 .4/k.29 /a.. fq , and did on the /6 6 day of c -77'ixec 19 98 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fora Svc 1 lea.v,e.J application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at mac. rt,0i,' �.e.r f' r-ar.t - Pam s. /,A. ��,�� ,�r . (state location you posted notice on property) Sig :to - n the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I D day of OCR. 0402-K- , 19q rb FACIAL tCIAL S:AL k., + t : LI J- ;ETON ROTH `,� NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON ;,i.: +� ge.656388 My Commission Expires: Si 3v/ pb Aif CO',MISrIOn EXPIRES AUG 33, 2004 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 1 NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant/Owner: I Address or General Location of Subject Property: [Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:Vog in tpattytma starsto ffpost m st — . 1 liv Public NOTICE This Property may be under consideration for a land use application with the City of Tigard. Posting of this notice, on this 16th day of October and shall remain posted until the 2nd day of November. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss the preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or. For additional information regarding this notice please call 639-2639 — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 SST AMEr,rc , •4s' ----- -4 Ft< ' '� First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon Washington(OR) Prepared For: Prepared By: Danielle Customer Service Department 1700 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97201-5512 Phone:(503)222-3651 Fax: (503)790-7872 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : R&W Partners Ref Parcel Number : 2S 101 AA 08300 CoOwner T:02S R: 01W S: 01 Q:253 Site Address : *No Site Address* Parcel Number :R0456777 Mail Address : 12600 SW 72nd Ave#200 Tigard Or 97223 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County : Washington(OR) / / SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION 1 / Transferred : 01/05/96 Loan Amount : $104,000 / Document# : 1318 Multi-Parcel Lender : Seller Sale Price : $195,000 Loan Type :Seller Deed Type : Warranty Interest Rate :Fixed Owned : 100 Vesting Type :Partnership PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page& Grid Land :$115,500 Census : Tract: Block: Structure . Subdivision/Plat : West Portland Heights Other .• Neighborhood Cd :ZTGL Total :$115,500 Land Use : 2002 Vacant,Commercial %Improved . Legal : WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS,BLOCK 29, 97-98 Taxes : $874.18 : LOT 1-4&9-12,ACRES .46 Exempt Amount : . Exempt Type . Levy Code : 02381 Millage Rate : 15.2720 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres : .46 Year Built .• Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 20,000 EJYearBlt .• Heat Method Bsm Fin SqFt Floor Cover . Pool Bsm Unfin SqFt : Foundation . Appliances Bsm Low SqFt Roof Shape .• Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl .• Hood Fan 1st Flr SqFt InteriorMat .• Deck Upper Fir SqFt : Paving Matl . Garage Type Porch SqFt Const Type . Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish .• Deck SqFt .• This title information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS WIT'S] NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS WEST CIT LAND USE SIIIICOMMITTEE EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT 4 tr Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude Craig Hopkins Jack Biethan 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 7430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 (503) 524-1068 (503) 524-0994 (503)639-2529 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F. Mahon John Bennett) 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 524-6325 (503)524-4550 (503)639-0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters Pat Wyden 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 1 1386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 524-5200 (503) 590-1970/(503)624-8009 (503) 620-7662 Ed Howden Barbara Sattler Scott Russell Sue Rorman 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose,OR 97056 Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 524-6040 (503) 684-8303 (503) 543-2434 Bonne &Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 590-0461 (503) 590-0523 (503) 590-4297 • Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard,OR 97223 '503) 590-3369 PLEASE NOTE; In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. fl Uopitilllatl W I,.ItterSKltnotlf.nrit 11 Marl) 4 M E T R O S AN P R O P E R T Y E P O R T = Washington (OR) * Date :07/17/98 Prepared By :Danielle * Time :11:20:34 Prepared For: * * Report Type :SUBRPT.TCF Company * * Sort Type :PARCEL Address * Parcels Printed :25 City/ST/Zip r;jCAA * ****************************************************** ** **** *** *********************** ******************************* * Search Parameters * *********-k********************* Reference Parcel Number. . .25 2S101AA 04900 2S101AA 04300 2S101AA 04500 2S101AA 05500 2S101AA 05700 2S101AA 07600 2S101AA 07700 2S101AA 07800 2S101AA 07900 2S101AA 08100 2S101AA 08700 2S101AA 08800 2S101AA 09800 2S101AA 09700 2S101AA 08301 2S101AA 08200 2S101AA 08500 _ 2S101AA 08600 2S101AA 09100 2S101AA 09101 2S101AA 04200 2S101AA 04000 2S101AA 03901 2S101AD 00800 2S101AA 09108 _a / 1 *. MetroScan / Washington (OR)-- * Parcel :R0456410 RefPar# :2S101AA 03901 Owner :Carpenter Richard L Xfered :11/27/89 Site :*No Site Address* Price . Mail :1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland Or 97221 Land :$77,720 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$325.30 Telephone: Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 21, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:29, 620 BldgSF: Ac: .68 # 2 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456429 RefPar# :2S101AA 04000 Owner :Pollock Donald E Xfered :07/19/95 Site :*No Site Address* Price :$1 Mail :1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland Or 97221 Land :$39, 190 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$546.43 Telephone:503-292-4373 Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 21, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 12, 500 B1dgSF: Ac: .29 # 3 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456447 RefPar# :2S101AA 04200 Owner :Pollock Donald E Xfered . Site :*No Site Address* Price :$75, 600 Mail : 1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland Or 97221 Land :$89, 240 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$1,066.45 Telephone:503-292-4373 Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 21, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:24, 393 BldgSF: Ac: .56 # 4 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456456 RefPar# :2S101AA 04300 Owner :Landmark Ford Inc Xfered :04/20/94 Site :6875 SW Franklin St Tigard 97223 Price :$53, 125 Mail :PO Box 23970 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$58,780 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$29, 970 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$903.50 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 655 G4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 22, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 12, 632 B1dgSF: Ac: .29 # 5 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456474 RefPar# :2S101AA 04500 Owner :Louie Richard C Xfered :04/11/94 Site : 12395 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$71, 300 Mail :8860 SW Bomar Ct Tigard Or 97223 Land :$47, 640 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$127, 710 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$1, 912.20 Telephone:503-246-5376 Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 22, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:7, 405 B1dgSF: 1, 709 Ac: .17 # 6 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456492 RefPar# :2S101AA 04900 Owner :Monego Joseph A/Cheryl A/James A Xfered :05/29/98 Site :12300 SW 69th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$90, 000 Mail :12300 SW 69th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$50, 460 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$38, 670 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$1,008.25 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 22, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:14,810 B1dgSF: Ac: .34 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. J • Y # 7 * _ . MetroScan / Washington (OR)- * Parcel :R0456544 RefPar# :2S101AA 05500 Owner :Corliss James L & Cora K Xfered :06/02/89 Site : 12300 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$150, 000 Mail :PO Box 23970 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$157,780 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$744,870 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$12, 342. 97 Telephone: Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 23, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:24, 829 BldgSF: Ac: .57 # 8 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456562 RefPar# :2S101AA 05700 Owner :Corliss James L & Cora K Xfered :09/14/90 Site :6745 SW Franklin St Tigard 97223 Price :$332, 760 Mail :PO Box 23970 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$346, 400 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$1, 663,200 Census :Tract:307.00 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$27, 481.50 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 H4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 23, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:55, 321 B1dgSF: Ac:1.27 # 9 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456704 RefPar# :2S101AA 07600 Owner :Wilhelm Michael W Xfered :07/19/93 Site :12540 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$350,000 Mail : 12540 SW 68th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$72, 960 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$266, 840 Census :Tract:304.02 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$4,242.25 Telephone:503-620-5313 Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 28, Bedrm: ' Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 12, 632 B1dgSF: Ac: .29 # 10 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456713 RefPar# :2S101AA 07700 Owner :Choruby Paul N Xfered :05/24/96 Site : 12520 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$350,000 Mail : 12520 SW 68th Ave #A Tigard Or 97223 Land :$85, 530 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$254,270 Census :Tract:304.02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$3, 890.55 Telephone: Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 28, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:14,810 B1dgSF: Ac: .34 # 11 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456722 RefPar# :25101AA 07800 Owner :Andrews Nellie B Xfered . Site : 12485 SW 67th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail : 12485 SW 67th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$143, 000 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$5, 620 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$1, 426.71 Telephone:503-639-1070 Thomas Bros:655 H4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 28, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:32, 670 B1dgSF: Ac: .75 # 12 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456731 RefPar# :2S101AA 07900 Owner :Springer Jerry & C Dianne Trs Xfered :04/30/96 Site :6750 SW Franklin St Tigard 97223 Price :$360,000 Mail :7400 SW Fairway Dr Wilsonville Or 97070 Land :$75, 470 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$261, 540 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$3,869.93 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 H4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 28, Bedrm: Bth: YB:1994 Lot Sgft: 13,068 BldgSF: Ac: .30 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. 6 , # 13 - *, MetroScan / Washington (OR)-- - * Parcel :R0456759 RefPar# :2S101AA 08100 Owner :Fuegy Allen & Raymond Xfered : 11/22/94 Site :12480 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$25, 750 Mail : 12480 SW 68th Ave #A Tigard Or 97223 Land :$63, 530 -Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$147, 720 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$2, 415.57 Telephone:503-639-0987 Thomas Bros: 625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 28, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:10, 000 B1dgSF: Ac: .23 # 14 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456768 RefPar# :2S101AA 08200 Owner :Roth Jacob Timothy Jr & Theresa Xfered :01/03/96 Site :12520 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$80, 312 Mail :12600 SW 72nd Ave #200 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$72, 190 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$360, 520 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$5,205.30 Telephone:503-639-2639 Thomas Bros: 625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: 1996 Lot Sgft: 12, 500 B1dgSF: Ac: .29 # 15 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456795 RefPar# :2S101AA 08500 _ Owner :R/W Partners Xfered :01/05/96 Site :*No Site Address* Price :$195, 000 Mail :12540 SW 68th Ave #B Tigard Or 97223 Land :$30,250 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$364.24 Telephone: Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:5, 000 BldgSF: Ac: . 12 # 16 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456802 RefPar# :2S101AA 08600 Owner :Peirce Stephen W Xfered . Site : 12525 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$63, 500 Mail : 12525 SW 68th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$60, 500 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$14, 710 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$869.89 e Telephone:503-639-9523 Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft: 10, 018 BldgSF: Ac: .23 # 17 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456811 RefPar# :2S101AA 08700 Owner :R/W Partners Xfered :01/05/96 Site :*No Site Address* Price :$195, 000 Mail : 12540 SW 68th Ave #B Tigard Or 97223 Land :$30, 250 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$218.53 Telephone: Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:5, 000 B1dgSF: Ac: .12 # 18 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456820 RefPar# :2S101AA 08800 Owner :Roth J T Jr & Theresa Xfered :02/04/97 Site : 12570 SW 69th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail : 12600 SW 72nd Ave #200 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$30,250 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$218.53 Telephone:503-639-2639 Thomas Bros: 655 G4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:5, 000 B1dgSF: Ac: . 12 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. '# 19 *' - MetroScan / Washington (OR)-- * • Parcel :R0456866 RefPar# :2S101AA 09100 Owner :Pollock Donald E Xfered . Site : 12520 SW 70th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$10, 000 , Mail :1834 SW 58th Ave #202 Portland Or 97221 Land :$308, 950 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$3, 720 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$3,724 .53 Telephone:503-292-4373 Thomas Bros:655 G4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 30, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 65, 775 B1dgSF: Ac: 1.51 # 20 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456875 RefPar# :2S101AA 09101 Owner :Kindrick Alfred F & Dianne M Xfered . Site : 12560 SW 70th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail : 12560 SW 70th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$53, 660 Use :1012 Res, Improved Imp :$89, 990 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 97-98 Taxes :$1, 616.55 Telephone:503-639-9577 Thomas Bros:655 G4 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 30, Bedrm:3 Bth:2.00 YB:1966 Lot Sgft:16, 117 B1dgSF:1, 411 Ac: .37 # 21 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0457767 RefPar# :2S101AD 00800 Owner :Renzema Dwight Xfered :10/02/96 Site :12575 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$440, 700 Mail :12575 SW 68th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$342, 600 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$22, 420 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$3, 004. 91 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal , :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 33, Bedrm: ' Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:56, 628 B1dgSF: Ac:1.30 # 22 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R2049028 RefPar# :2S101AA 08301 Owner :Roth Jacob Timothy Jr & Theresa Xfered :01/03/96 Site : 12520 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail : 12600 SW 72nd Ave #200 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$14, 440 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp . Census :Tract:304 .02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$109.33 Telephone:503-639-2639 Thomas Bros:625 H6 Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 29, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:2, 500 BldgSF: Ac: .06 # 23 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R2058297 RefPar# :2S101AA 09700 Owner :Dana Mark R Xfered . Site :12585 SW 68th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :12585 SW 68th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Land :$103, 900 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$289,770 Census :Tract:304 .02 Block: 1 97-98 Taxes :$4, 689.41 Telephone: Thomas Bros: 625 H6 Subdiv . Legal :PARTITION PLAT 1996-024, LOT 1, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:17, 859 B1dgSF: Ac: .41 # 24 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R2058298 RefPar# :2S101AA 09800 Owner :Roth J T Jr & Theresa Xfered :02/04/97 Site :12570 SW 69th Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :12600 SW 72nd Ave #200 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$103, 900 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$92, 170 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$2, 335.56 Telephone:503-639-2639 Thomas Bros:655 G4 Subdiv . Legal :PARTITION PLAT 1996-024, LOT 2, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft: 17, 991 B1dgSF: Ac: .41 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ppor . • # 25+ - * MetroScan / Washington (OR)-- * Parcel :R2069676 RefPar# .2S101AA 09108 ' Owner :Porter Denise Xfered :06/04/97 Site :*No Site Address* Price :$147, 825 Mail :7991 SW Mohawk St Tualatin Or 97062 Land :$97, 410 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Imp . Census :Tract: Block: 97-98 Taxes :$1, 160.35 Telephone: Thomas Bros: Subdiv :West Portland Heights Legal :WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, BLOCK 30, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:19, 602 B1dgSF: Ac: . 45 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. or• i .. . . NE Il4 NE 1/4 SECTION I T2S R I W W.M. I 3' as I IAA WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 1 i N.., r SEE MAP SCALE f•100 I G IL N 1!•00� �_1 1. L _ rJ L I 1 1 •..c...o ..fie,^ =S.W. DARTMOUTH STREET ■,..• Ie.pT•91 I S `m'W" " 60 r.r+.r.•TWT.f•r7 r r„.,•Tr.r,r,rT.n .. r 'T !M1 ...•••°w r YT99' r •r.r Jr 200 r 1700 + DOUCLA! .... I 2900 2170.0 W 2.100 16�OOK W ... '' DRIVE e.39111 .l.r. I U I • W • •.�„yw.... .12 ! { 3 6 1 • I L 3 • 3 • 1 • 7 1 2 3 • a • 1 e I i 3 • y • T E / . r w Z IzI z1 �° • ..».......1110.». w w •U • . , w n J I▪ 1i.+ > - 9 is 11 - > 3. 1 > 9 x I > r a......,r S • 34-- Q - i0 35 - a j•Ac.. 400 i `= 1- 10 + 33 I Q 1 00 • + 11 ells. • I- II 31 ! C) 1 II I 12 4 _S!_- 33 I] az 55• F I3 32 y +16 �. Z..°°e 1,9 3 18 a i s 2 1{ I� s2. 2.j 16 — - 2000 1{ 31 i 1 I la 13 + 3O i I r. F 2�0 1177�' line f + 106 n`lrl II * 29 3 L•30 11 2e ti e 1s z9 -- Le - IT 24 a * I rn+ + 106 11119, TTY- le ,z: ie e� L I r T-1 r+ T T Y T i I- , . + ,• 200 I I r 1 1.9120 21 22123 2.2328 .NOG 2223 26 I9w•C' 22 2329zs 2$ IR 20 21 axs2 23 26 + W1 E Si -r 2 r 1 Q I r. I . • 1 . • 1 . . . . . . ■ -_ A . w2 L • :w -'`01;J 23-81 ,.•, K ■ I S.W. ELMHURST STREET ____ n 2.,1 ~T , . ' T T T-f m T r ,e '' I 6100 , 6200 • y 9.80) I SEE MAP gaeon I 5 25 I IAe -A.TI AL 31{ 3 6 7 • I'14'3 • 6 5 7 4 1 ! 3 { 6 6 7 1 1 I I 2 3 { 3 6 7 a1 - 1 I I • W —. r. . . I ,. - ■ , . .10 J. _ . . . - . . . 1 1 slop 9 35 , 1..,.r..w. p ' 36 t 9 X300 eTOO + F. . a I \2.;l p 3O5 33 10 __ R1 i 1111!__5 K 1 e II 3{ r it 36 t a1 .4,.. 33 20 12 33 ~ ,6 a 6.01'12 33 92 2.D I -2 •p It SS 30 - 112 - _ p. 1-n.•1..T a9 , fO 1. .A. r i 1• 2I 40°2 . - is 22 ez I' 23 3 !i .awo 2.4 ll 11 I 2{J 11.11 e 13 30 30 la 30 5 ,b1s • to y I • H z9 9 _29 _ 1• - 29 ., :I f2 H ♦ es 1 1 .or p 11 La-- _ IT + La M =T • F ,• ' 21 t ill (� I Ip LT 16 , 21 �,-- , • ••1 E Y Z •zoo .soo I •s AO I I l -•1 %. 19 9 zo 21 a 23 N 26 26 '9 02012.a 23 24 25 2i 9 MI21 a 23 24 25 26 9 20 21 a 23 24 2321 I rn+ / r I L L N I J • STREETI I D G !$yy FRANKLIN + -i T I • r ill < . I • . SII • • • ' • •• ••..•- '•11pp' Tf00� 6100 1 9100 11 r•LOCO el2lK. 1110.1 I I 1131.0 Q I ill 3 •15 a l e 3 1 2 A°•6 7 6 1.2 3 { 3 6 1 7•I I i.2 3 4 5 6 7 6A I 1 I (0610.9331 1111• I 1 1 y 1 , I P-1 art...••�+L •9. .I+ ' >`c y e. J. _ a 700 . ,eao f 9 + 36 • . U I+ - ..c 117.1 q 33 b l ,( • ■ 10_ 34- !3_ 9 33 '';T II 34 -1 Q. II + 34 - I r\ �l 1 II 2200 + - .•.c -11 12 33 • 12 53 l S.W. 3� I2 33 c 12 .i .1 yi 1' . • SOUTH WOOD •/Nj I3 + sz :1700 ecoo - s 29 lx F 3 2+7 sx ! I 251 • oRrvE _I 3+0 ■s. 2 9.n.c !I . Si 2.i 6 I• 31 1 �jl K. ▪ f 9 . to • �1 = BEVEL AND 2 IS + so = 1.30 1 30 - aO + + I STREET ' 1 29 16 29 • IS 29 .• +• } tR• Ea may.r,y.:.- f x• 710 +4. FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSE! A J'OG sloe - • 3500 I 1.97215--_ _ , 1• 21 1 i T N + 27 T 1 I 6.'A--- ONLY. I. -1 T T • I /• DO MOT RELY ON 704 ANT•irT - OTHER USE. C •1998`,•02A••.1 92321 aia2123261 I 21551 12625 1 + I } i9xoaszlra23 r i� 1 0 I 9 3 1 so r I G l b IT E/1 Ir rr,r.r,r1rlr.••,ri.: :6 2 � I % .1i pir.•...{•ir._0•,. )�0.4114.4474•04317....4r,' L T IGARD ! A,9�'9T�..S.YS'2,q _ 19.r aosxu. n_I - •.•.•n 1 Ise 01[41 1 !�� ^•„, ' 2S I IAA 1 r ....____. ,._ , - • SE I/4 NE I/4 SECTION I T2S R I W W.M. 2S I IAD WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I".100' SASS um r SOTS 00,.1.01. rte, Meioa,iaro0. SEE MAP 23 e5 8 II ,e°°°.eb•,u 2S 1 IAA i euieo' BOO I 141 I I ter g >' 3i{ 30 . 29 .d 1.SO4e. 2 8 I i1 I 27 z I 26± 7 , I 3/,{ 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 261 n 1 > Z ..ye..,.1->,,>,1.1>_4 4 L e/ a 1- m 4 1-• • S VACATED 2 YAeATae 2115.0. 9017 AGA Sr) t SC D 1� :7-.wm a q a-.N.A R <wu n ronn I ee ;,ens , + Z �,T..•T b'T.YT.'*u?rb n•TeY hr n'�n'TtrTte'e. e. .. :.TV-Tb�.r .f er n-'bt ady is Ia'Tn'T.';e're Tevnt.T er •9 r 0 voa I 2400 w 800 9 I a. 0 1 a raj A I 2 3 4 1 s 6 7 0 1 2 13`4 5 6 7 8 -. I.1A43 4 5 6 7 6P1 1 1 10044. 4 5 e 7 8$ C) S.W. 1 0+ . 1 . 1 _ I. 1 1 + 1 a[�. W 1 , . - - wo- +:0' 1 IDi W.4491 I .n. Q GONZAGA is >i 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 + 1. 1 1 - +sTA STREET zeoo { { 36 a`_ reoo 8 9 .lane 35 + 35 7- _.N -- { . F 10 {1-1,1 39 t I I L.) 'E II ; 34 +- II +} 34 34 1 F 11 + 34 b '" 2900 33 12 IDS @0.»41 33�'- - Ia ■ r 12 +i 33 b I + .es AC. 32 - '�'- - ... -432 32 `_ _ 1400 33'd we i Ili'I- 3+1 1 3+4 r;; A 3 5 m 9 (4 31 -- 31 -1 dwe. 4 SI i! b IS + 30 + 30 15 + 1 1 F ,>fD4C + 30 :i 1 m ii + - ^ + -1C-3 22,039)4- 1 F + (71 1 9 I6 + 29 16 29 16 29 16 29 5 + A - EI ACP - 17 + 28 - _ 17 + _ -�,_ - 1300 1100 aF 17 + 28 - I D k le I 27 IB oe' - Td4.c r _ .ua- 18 Co.18.904127 5 jA ^T T T -I-' T T 1 T 1 t- F r T T + 7 I T - L I . , L,.... S I Q y I I a �' B B 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 A: IB 2012, 22 23 24 25 26 t B 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 B 20 21 22 23 24 a i lD I + °--8 W b 10412,841 N� I C I IIDS.e.9ni II .`, . . , . 1 ■ 1 1 •°'K, , l 'i 1 1 1 . , , 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I- 4 3 o i S S.W. = II HAMPTON STREET: I O s W C r T T r2 T.7.,;:. T r-t r T T Ta97 7 r T 1 t r " 3 1 4 0 1 I w l 3300 3500 I 1 I" _24) 1 A 3100 3 4 5 6 7 91 13200 4 5 6 7 81 w 1 1 2 3 4 5A6e 01 I I 2 3 4 5 6 7 B: \.j sj 2 r.siK I 1 tae eA I .o I I i -1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 .I F 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 4 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 '^ STA.n.pace A 9 + 36 -1 F 9 + 36 4 F 9 36 1 F 9 1 36 - I t S 10 35 10 35 10 35 10 35 Z ■ \] 11 >• + -I F 11 + 31 ' F 11 34 , : F 11 + 3• I m 9 b 13 U)+ 32 i - 12 + 33 -1^ .,F 12 33 + F 12 4 33 +4. F IS 32 I3 38 32 'ICS 19141)13 3+7 32 Z�� is la 4+0 31 1 1F + ° F' L1_1+101RE6e) -I • F 1410913,9291 34 + F 3400 31 4 ` F 14 1C.3.1,389)31 2 19 15 IC.3.49391'30 04 15 + 30 •21 AG 30 + • F IS + 30 • 11 IA 1rC3.Del7) 1 F + i F m i i* 29 1 F 16 + 29 + F 16 29 1 = F 18 + 29 °, 3 Jr �� 28 17 26 17 26 17 28 S A 1 + -I 4 + 1 F -1 F + -3 I 4.01 5 19 27 le 27 IB 27 18 27 S.M. 7 T T T + 1- -r T +\ i T 7 7 4 7 T T '\ I' T T T + T T T - 1I r T T + T T T - 1- 1 u;4 8 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26$ 27 21 22 03 24 25 2618 B 21 22 23 24 25 N B 20 (11 } I1 B 20 21 22 z3 z4 23 2618 i1 .. "' _— na-- C•I� I 1 11( 3 I 1 V) 1 -1 10' '1[e'y b'l aay•Yyee'1 e6l etyef�.e b'11_n'1n'1.Il•rin'1n',1210, (n 1,2 y esya'y:r1n'13.1n'1tr.j ed Ile'1n'1tYyn'1b'1.dy.dyn' a9' H'1 eA 1X F 1.V 1J`i .e .e>.. L.a• _ 1.....1 W "-soot FOR ASSESSMENT +.T1 so*Gam PURPOSES ONLY. SEE MAP DO NOT RELY ON 4 20 1 !DA FOR ANY OTHER USE _--89'-- ( wa — TIGARD 9Q I I All MI r . .. -1 1. G C G , °c G ,c, \co October 16, 1998 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Resie• • submitted, 4iJ '� Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 9722.3 503/639-2.639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 -- CV O� . j �G 5� G Oo co' October 16, 1998 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns St. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69th & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Re:pe fu.y submitted, '�%��/I A. R i th, Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 -- G' OC yl�G O� G �9°`r Oct Cober 16, 1998 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 691" &Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respe, , submitted, C f J. ►. ;o1 , Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave., Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — �Cr G�\ October 16, 1998 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce St. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69th &Franklin(Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Res.e submitted, 4rft l J.T. ` oth, Jr. 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave., Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — ` CG q°" October 16, 1998 Richard Carpenter 1834 SW 58th Ave. #202 Portland, Or. 97221 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69t & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respe submitted, J . ' et , Jr. -- 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 2.00,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — • SC G°c , October 16, 1998 Richard Louie 8860 SW Bomar Ct. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respect I submitted, . /Roth, Jr — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200.Tigard, Oregon 972.23 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — 16‘44s\''c' 16, 1998 Joseph& Cheryl Monego 12300 SW 69th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69t & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respe s submitted, .T. Rot Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — C 70 0 c G 9_61/4 October 16, 1998 Michael Wilhelm 12540 SW 68th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69th & Franklin(Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Re�;�� ly submitted, -j %. RI h, Jr. -- 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — OG Oc moomew l� JG • '01 955\ October 16, 1998 James & Cora Corliss PO Box 23970 Tigard, Or. 97281 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Res. . full, ubmitted, der' . Roth, Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — o r 16, 1998 Jerry& Dianne Springer 7400 SW Fairway Dr. Wilsonville, Or. 97070 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respectfully submitted, A J. . R s h, Jr. 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — CG C i3O co c°` October 16, 1998 Nellie Andrews 12485 SW 67th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Res. fully submitted, .T. Rot Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 -- CG. \ OC 9-°"(‘ October 16, 1998 Paul Choruby 12520 SW 68th Ave. #A Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Re :- : lly s itted, . Roth, . — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 972.23 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — CG. J • CS October 16, 1998 Allen&Raymond Fuegy 12480 SW 68th Ave. #A Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin(Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Resp- fully submitted, J. P• ' rh, J,. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2.639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — CV O� G„� G OC co October 16, 1998 Donald Pollock 1834 SW 58th Ave. #202 Portland, Or. 97221 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, BIk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69th&Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respectfully submitted, ., J. . ' e th, Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave., Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 9722.3 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 --- P r 16, 1998 Stephen Peirce 12525 SW 68th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respectfully su' itted, •t , Jr. 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 2.00,Tigard, Oregon 9722.3 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — (O' r G~\� �(J cy G° ill° �O October 16, 1998 Alfred & Dianne Kindrick 12560 SW 70th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69t & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respectfully submitted, a a . . of Jr. 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard,Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — CG. JL6' - j��°�r October 16, 1998 Dwight Renzema • 12575 SW 68`h Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respec Ily submitted, det II J. ',.th, J . 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — F 6, 1998 Mark Dana 12585 SW 68th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, Blk 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69`h & Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respec y submitted, J 4.t , r 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — \CG . 4, ctober 16, 1998 G° �~CP Denise Porter 7991 SW Mohawk St. Tualatin, Or. 97062 Re: Land Use Notification Tax Lot 8300, 131k 29 West Portland Heights Tigard, Or. Dear Neighbor: As a requirement to gain approval for an application to perform improvements on my property, the City of Tigard requires that I notify property owners located within a 250 ft. radius of same property. It is with this form that I am offering said notice. An informal meeting will be held on October 30, 1998 between the hours of 3:30 pm and 4:30 pm to discuss preliminary drawings/plans. The meeting will be held at my office located at 12600 SW 72nd, suite 200, Tigard, Or.. I am proposing to develop approx. 15,000 sq. ft. of presently un-developed property located at the southeast corner of 69th& Franklin (Tax lot 8300 Blk 29 West Portland Heights), Tigard. Improvements to said property would consist of approx. 6,000 sq.ft. of a professional office building. An invitation is extended to those parties interested. Please understand that this proposal is at the preliminary stages of development and anything stated in this notice or during the informal meeting is subject to change or modifications. Respectfully submitted, - 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave., Suite 200,Tigard,Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 -- SIGN UP Public Hearing for Proposed Site Development Oct. 30, 1998 Southeast corner 69th& Franklin, Tigard, Or. Tax Lot 8300 Block 29 West Portland Heights Please provide the following information: Name I Address I City/Zip I Time I Signature 1 ,. 1 /12'0,6 54- G. (Gel' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Comments: (Please gi name) Pi>el 11,7 Carlson Testing, Inc• finical Consulting P.O. Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97281 Feburary 2, 1996 Phone(503) 684-3460 FAX(503)684-0954 CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. 12540 SW 68th Pkwy, Ste. B Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attn: Tim Roth FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION J.T. ROTH OFFICE BUILDINGS (LOTS 2 - 4) TIGARD, OREGON •This report presents the results of our shallow foundation investigation for the proposed office buildings in Tigard. The purpose of our investigation is to characterize the near-surface soils and provide geotechnical evaluations and recommendations for the proposed building foundations. Our work was performed per your verbal authorization. BACKGROUND Previous Reports Foundation Investigation for the J.T. Roth Office Building - Lot 1, Carlson Testing, Inc., December 5, 1995. Site Description The Lot 2 property (.55 acres) is located on the northwest corner of SW Gonzaga St. and SW 68th Ave. The site is thickly covered with small and large fir trees, brush, and berry bushes. Lot 3 (.55 acres) is located on the northeast corner of SW Gonzaga St. and SW 69th Ave. There is an existing abandoned house near the center of the site. We understand the house is planned for demolition. The property contains large amounts of garbage and debris. Lot 4 (.52 acres) is located on the southeast corner of SW Franklin St. and SW 69th Ave. The property is thickly covered with trees and brush. The above mentioned lots are relatively level and rectangular in shape. Proposed Construction The plan indicates that the proposed construction on Lot 2 will consist of a one-story, wood- framed structure with a raised wood floor. The building is roughly rectangular in shape (53 x 85 feet). The construction also includes 100 feet of driveway and 22 parking spaces. We understand the proposed buildings on Lots 3 & 4 will be two-story, wood-framed structures with a concrete slab-on-grade. Also included in the projects are several feet of driveway and numerous parking spaces. • CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 2 Project Data Location - Lot 2; NW corner of SW Gonzaga St. and SW 68th Ave. - Lot 3; NE corner of SW Gonzaga St. and SW 69th Ave. - Lot 4; SE corner of SW Franklin St and SW 69th Ave. (Thomas Bros. Map 655, Grid Column H:Row 4, 1996 ed). Client - J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. - Address on title page. Jurisdictional Agency - City of Tigard, Oregon. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Review of the Lake Oswego geologic map from Earthquake Hazard Geology Maps of the Portland Metropolitan Area (USGS Open-File Report 0-90-2) indicates that the site is immediately underlain by about 30 feet of fine-grained catastrophic flood deposits (Off) over Boring Lava (QTb). Geological and seismological evidence suggests that the northwest coast has a "locked subduction zone" which is capable of generating very large (M8 to M9 Richter Scale) earthquakes with long durations of shaking over a vast region. Local faulting and seismicity are not as well understood, but are also believed to be capable of strong shaking. In response, Oregon State regulators upgraded the entire Western Region to a UBC Seismic Zone 3. An inferred fault has been mapped approximately 2000 feet north of the property. No evidence is currently available to determine definitively whether this inferred fault exists, and if so, whether it is still active. To our knowledge, the property is not in an area prone to inordinate seismic activity in the immediate vicinity. The adoption of Seismic Zone 3 as defined by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) by the State of Oregon for the region west of the Cascades should be adequate for earthquake-resistant design at the site. Based on our literature research, it is our opinion that the UBC soil profile type "S," description best matches the site, however, because no deep subsurface explorations were performed, we recommend using the site factor for S3. FIELD EXPLORATIONS A total of 4 hand augers to a maximum depth of 6 feet were augered on January 22nd, 1996 located just outside of any anticipated building foundations. A description of the field exploration procedures and the hand auger logs are presented in Appendix A. The test pit locations are shown on the Site Plan, attached as Figure 1. Laboratory testing procedures and test results are presented in Appendix B. CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 3 SOIL CONDITIONS Near-surface soil conditions observed in the hand augers at the site were very consistent with those found in our previous investigation. The surface of the building sites are currently overlain by approximately 18 to 24 inches of topsoil and roots. Occasional deeper mounds (approx. 4 feet) were observed at the sites. Beneath the topsoil to the maximum depth explored, the native soils consisted of a tan and brown silt with some clay and ranged in consistency from stiff to very stiff between 4 and 6 feet. No groundwater was observed in any of the hand augers. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the proposed buildings are geotechnically feasible given the soil conditions encountered in this investigation. It is also our opinion that the native soils beneath the proposed building pads are suitable for support of spread footings. Building Pad Preparation/Slabs-On-Grade The upper 18 to 24 inches of the topsoil should be removed from within the building pad. The trees root systems and stumps should be excavated and backfilled with engineered fill. Occasional deeper topsoil removals should be anticipated. For winter construction, engineered fill should consist of a clean granular fill (3/"-0 or 1 Y2"-0 crushed aggregate). The slabs should be underlain by a minimum of 6 inches of "-0 crushed aggregate base compacted to at least 95 percent of the standard Proctor (ASTM D698)maximum dry density. The building designer(s) should use their experience on deciding if a vapor barrier beneath the slab is necessary. No groundwater or other geotechnical reasons requiring extraordinary precautions against ground moisture were discovered at the site. Engineered Fill If earthwork is to be performed during the wet weather season, then a wet weather construction plan should be discussed with the contractor and the Soil Engineer. All grading should be performed in accordance with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, with the • exceptions and additions noted herein. Imported material should be approved by the Soil Engineer prior to arrival on site. Engineered fill should be compacted in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches using standard compaction equipment. A minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density obtained from the modified Proctor, AASHTO T-180, or equivalent standard is recommended for engineered fill. Field density testing should conform to ASTM D 2922 and D 3017, or D 1556. All engineered fill should be observed and tested by the Soil Engineer's representative. Typically for a project CTI # 95-4577 ::.J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 4 of this type,'at least one density test is performed for foot of fill placed or every 200 yd3 of earthwork performed, whichever is greater. The earthwork contractor should be contractually held responsible for project density test scheduling and frequency. Foundations The proposed structure, of the type anticipated, can be founded on shallow spread footings bearing on the native soil. Spread footing construction and setback requirements should conform to the Uniform Building Code (UBC). For uniform bearing conditions, the spread footings should bear at a depth of 24 inches below original grade and a minimum of 18 inches below finish grade. The minimum recommended widths for a continuous wall footing and a square pad footing is 18 and 24 inches, respectively. We anticipate that the allowable bearing capacity can be taken as 2,000 Ib/ft2 for footings bearing on the native soils, with a one-third increase for short duration loads such as wind and seismic. The coefficient of friction between on-site soil and poured-in-place concrete may be taken as 0.40. The maximum anticipated total and differential footing movements (generally from settlement) are 1 inch and 312 inch over a span of 20 feet, respectively. Drainage Surface water drainage should be directed away the proposed structure. Roofdrain water should be carried to the closest possible catch basin in the parking lot. Perimeter footing drains should be used in areas adjacent the building that are not paved. The on-site soils are not conducive to in-ground storm water disposal. CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 5 GENERAL NOTES This report was prepared solely for the Owner and Engineer for the design of the project. We encourage its review by bidders and/or the Contractor as it relates to factual data only (test pits and laboratory data). The opinions and recommendations contained within the report are not intended to be nor should they be construed to represent a warranty of subsurface conditions but are forwarded to assist in the planning and design process. Our reports pertain to the material tested/inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. We would be pleased to provide additional input, as necessary, during the design process and to provide on-site observation and testing during construction. Please feel free to contact us for this . • work as well as for any questions you might have regarding this report. Sincerely, CARLSON TESTING, INC. 0 -1) PRop FER 04IN io 14743 37 (-)IL OREGON O v • 23• 19. MMES D. lt:ko`�\y �. 30-77 B / By Brian D. Leach, E.I. James D. Imbrie, P.E. Engineering Associate Geotechnical Engineer CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 6 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION A total of 4 hand augers to approximately 6 feet were excavated on January 22nd, 1996 at site locations shown on Figure 1. The augering was performed using a 3-inch diameter bucket-type auger attached to 1-inch diameter threaded rods and turned using a T-handle by hand. The hand augers were logged as to changes in soil type, moisture, relative strength, and ground water occurrence. Representative soil samples were taken from selected depths in the test pits and retained in airtight jars for moisture testing. Field testing consisted of pocket penetrometer testing on the exposed walls of the hand augers. Logs of the test pits showing changes in soil type,groundwater seepage,sampling details, and results of field and laboratory testing of moisture testing are presented on Figures A-1 and A-4. -A-1- r 1 ■l - 36 9 - - 55 • SA 4 C. 35 10 34 -1- 4900 34 w - II as 33 (0 - .SaAe. - 33 - Co 12 • S, 1 000• 2- z 32 13 2 14 31 - 14 i . 30 30 I5 _ - 29 + 29 16 S. - - -1-- - - - - o 28 17 28 17 27 18 27 IB T T T 1 I 1 I I , I 1 1 4300 1 4500 1 N • AC .17 AC 23 24 25 2 6 19 201 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20121 22 pIo r I I I 1 I 1 , , I I , FRANKLIN 1 , , ---" , 2] - - - 8300 8200 '8100-- - - .52Ac. .29 AC. JAC. 5 6 7 8 ;1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 2 3 4 1 0 r . J. J. J. _. _ UT 1 J. 1' _ 11 I 1 36 _ I '- I 36 7700 _ _35 2 35 34 AC. _ �� i 34 + Lt±- g�DQ `I It 33 - 12 i At' ;I 12 32 t 8700 r) }},�7i66C ;1,1 13 2 •.O 31 - Jr AC. G J 11.7, 0 F 7600 304 .34 AC • f 8800 • Q9 .12 AC. t9.. 16 Fa0 - n 8900 A .06Ac. 28 17 • t U IB f T -r T - '1 U T ,27' 9000 Q 19001 3 AC. 1c. 1 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 N 26 19 20 21 22 its'1tD'it7'itly a0' 1t'1ee 1..-'1' t6' p •tt'lt�y N tf'ytF'y17lti_ VACA i[D Ibb^ VACATED (S.W. 009 iT•uotoo— — -� - — — lT--�• • - - vacATtO — — Stt MAP- 2S I 1 A n 5 n 1 1 a II Ii. 'o- Y 9e 0 i 0" P ti `O b Q Site Plan 'O� � ARLSQ Carlson Testing,Inc. to ` p- c ul o _ ° / P.O.Box 23814 = 1O J.T.Roth -Lots 2 through 4 TGES•TI,O INC. Tigard,Oregon 97281 P c" Tigard,Oregon 684-3480 Fax 684-0954 I • APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Classification, Water Contents and Unit Weights Soil conditions were evaluated, described, and classified in accordance with the classification format described in the Oregon Department of Transportation Soil and Rock Classification Manual (ODOT Highway Division, 1987), based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Natural moisture contents were taken in plastic baggies; all samples were tested in accordance with ASTM D 2216. The moisture contents are expressed as a percentage of free water lost by evaporation compared to the dry weight of soil. These are presented numerically on the hand auger logs. - B-1 - CTI # 95-4577 J.T. Roth Office Buildings Page 5 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION A total of 5 hand augers tc approximately 6 feet were excavated on January 22nd, 1996 at site locations shown on Figure 1. The augering was performed using a 3-inch diameter bucket-type auger attached to 1-inch diameter threaded rods and turned using a T-handle by hand. The hand augers were logged as to changes in soil type, moisture, relative strength, and ground water occurrence. Representative soil samples were taken from selected depths in the test pits and retained in airtight jars for moisture testing. Field testing consisted of pocket penetrometer testing on the exposed walls of the hand augers. Logs of the test pits showing changes in soil type,groundwater seepage,sampling details,and results of field and laboratory testing of moisture testing are presented on Figures A-1 and A-5. -A-1- Hand Auger No. HA-1 Logged by: Brian Leach Date Excavated: 1-22-96 - Location: See site plan Surface Elevation: ? e — o - a) >. o.o 4` � L E a) o Material Description °- v c E •5 E o a. a_ (0 2O o SILT with some clay (ML); roots, dark brown, med. stiff, wet 1 (24" Topsoil Layer) 2 SILT with some clay (ML); tan/light brown, stiff, moist 3 - 4 - Transitions to very stiff. 5 - - (Native) - Bottom of hand auger @ 6 ft. 7 - No groundwater encountered. 8 - 9 - 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- C Job No. 95-4577 Log of Hand Auger Hole Figure: A- 1 ) tsI,L3o °'�C.T't:a~ Carlson Testing, Inc. - P.O. Box 23814- Tigard,Oregon 97281 -684-3460- Fax 684-0954 tE SIirvG iNC 1 Hand Auger No. HA- 2 Logged by: Brian Leach Date Excavated: 1-22-96 • Location: See site plan Surface Elevation: r - iv U) - 1 a) . °�; o F- .-- 1.-5 s Material Description cp o as U) � O fin SILT with some clay (ML); roots, dark brown, med. stiff, wet 1 - (24" Topsoil Layer) 2 --� SILT with some clay (ML); tan/light brown, stiff, moist 3 Transitions to very stiff. 4 , 5 , (Native) 6 Bottom of hand auger @ 6 ft. 7 - No groundwater encountered. 8 - 9 - 10- 11 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- ■ CJob No. 95-4577 Log of Hand Auger Hole Figure: A-2 Q,aLSo �'�[:T:t�~ Carlson Testing, Inc. - P.O. Box 23814 -Tigard, Oregon 97281 - 684-3460- Fax 684-0954 TE 6T�NG IHC Hnd Auger No. HA- 3 Logged by: Brian Leach Date Excavated: 1-22-96 Location: See site map Surface Elevation: ? 1 o Q o L O N j rS M a Q rSo 0 Material Description m n. x E .� c E n o szu as O o a a. a co U 0 SILT with some clay (ML); roots, dark brown, med. stiff, wet 1 - (18" Topsoil Layer) 2 - SILT with some clay (ML); brown, med. stiff, moist 3 - 4 - 5 -1 6 - Transitions to very stiff. - (Native) 7 Bottom of hand auger @ 7 ft. 8 - No groundwater encountered. 9 , 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- C Job No. 95-4577 Log of Hand Auger Hole Figure: A- 3 ) A !-so Gt-er r� Carlson Testing, Inc. - P.O. Box 23814-Tigard, Oregon 97281 - 684-3460- Fax 684-0954 Hand Auger No. HA- 4 Logged by: Brian Leach Date Excavated: 1-22-96 Location:See site map Surface Elevation:? L 1 46 Z' O _ ° Q o CO Material Description CI as u) O _ SILT with some clay (ML); roots, dark brown, med. stiff, wet 1 - (20" Topsoil Layer) 2 - SILT with some clay (ML); brown, soft to med. stiff, moist to wet 3 - Transitions to light brown, med.stiff. 4 - 5 - Transitions to stiff. 6 - (Native) Bottom of hand auger @ approx. 6 ft. 7 - No groundwater encountered. 8 - 9 - 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- CJob No. 95-4577 Log of Hand Auger Hole Figure: A- 4 totLS0 G 4 .1'.1:�� Carlson Testing, Inc. - P.O. Box 23814-Tigard, Oregon 97281 - 684-3460- Fax 684-0954 tEBTING INC APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Classification, Water Contents and Unit Weights Soil conditions were evaluated, described, and classified in accordance with the classification format described in the Oregon Department of Transportation Soil and Rock Classification Manual (ODOT Highway Division, 1987), based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Natural moisture contents were taken in plastic baggies; all samples were tested in accordance with ASTM D 2216. The moisture contents are expressed as a percentage of free water lost by evaporation compared to the dry weight of soil. These are presented numerically on the hand auger logs. • - B-1 - ..._�� .r+ °VIM rr? �� _k CITY v ,[ i z, , _ „..,.., k PRE- rLIeAuoNcoNFEaENeNoTEs : ; .44 tin. ,raa[Pre,,Applicatlon Meeting;Notes:are;Va.Id,forLSlx 161 Months'. �..x,z . - �Z i; _Y app., NON-RESIDENTIAL •PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: _ £9 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: ■■ C4. APPLICANT: -M l` 1,1 AGENT: Phone:I I GS1 — 2CDS1 Phone: I I PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 4,0 �� 2S l l A 2 ::3D TAX MAPESI/LOT#151: NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: SA- e .\(6Ltpc)ME P/c ,\, PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: c t cvQ-- " 1k cc Kc_t-(�(Nr COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ,I. _ — ..e St, 1, ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: NCO CI.T.AREA r_; --- FACILITATOR: (Scams-f) PHONE: 15031 ,( e_et2s rto i se ) Cat- eTr c u(L‘(gS ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL RE U REMENTS ii . MINIMUM LOT SIZE:_ ,I( sq. ft. gage lot width: v) ft. Maximum building height:49 ft. Setbacks: Front D-(p ft. 51(64-Side o-0 ft. Rear—ft. Cvi — ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: i 5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: L5. %. [Refer to Code Section 18._5w °i 1 MA1-- 'KO°i c- goisb ` Qv 7, ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM OT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is ated-th h the minor land partition process. Lots creat d as part of a partition must h minimum of 15 feet rontage or have a minimum 15- foot wide ccess easement. The DE TH OF ALL LO ALL NOT EXCEED 2 TIMES THE AV GE WIDTH, unless the parcel is ss than 1 es the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning distric . [Refer TITS-onion 18.164.060-lots' CITY OFTIGAAO Pro-AppllcaUan Conference Notes Pagel 0110 NON-tail/ntlal Nppllutla■/Plsrilo/BMsIaN SacUoo SPECIAL SETBACKS > STREETS: (:). feet from the centerline of f-AticNICCA rki . D ESTABLIS ED AREAS: feet from . > LOWER I ENSITY ZON . ... feet, along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FO IDE YARD SETBACKS \ [Refer to C e-Seifin and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (y) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to CotlerSection 18.98.0201 ta-to•olo PARKING AND ACCESS (8--y REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Z •7 /l (moo i6 = (C Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): Cam) SECONDARY REQUIR arking: j(R�- (z �) = 3'�/Ili Parking WN on pr ' ]nary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. > Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. Note: Parking space width Includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201 iaktJ W SAC (* O\ Handicapped Parking: ,t i\a∎( y VAN-ACcESSt & > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. > BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: I . Minimum pavement width: 2(4' I All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 0 A . [Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.1081 0?-705 CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Apptication Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 NIN-Natld.atlat .jpllciUeu/fliuI.1 NMstu S.ctiu WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 k3. -7 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10m 1 m _ e . - = ET shall be provided with a loading space. The space si - -•: • . on shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [ligelifiZO l •ctlon 18.106.070-0901 CLEAR VISION AREA N �o + S erTI9Ci< U $ The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.1021 - 9 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1001 t 3-1r6' The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: V" ` feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OFTIGABO Pre-Annllcatloa Conference Notes Page 3 0(11 IIM�atJlaatlaI PjpIIciUauRtaaalall Mislay Sactla■ SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Section 18.1141 SENSITIVE LANDS ' e Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR D LOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAIN . _ AYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE G C D. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference •: -d on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, . •• their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive . - must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, pr, 'on, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHI ODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLIPES -n STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be sub • ed which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 8.84.040.B. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include s►-cific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.' UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGEN [USA] BUFFER STANDARDS,R a 0 96-44 LAND DEVELOP NT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor f• a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDaR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries • the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the wid of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion •f the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegeta :d corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 fe:t, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corne or within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average '•th of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities hall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated •rridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDI •. 8 FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be wit-ned by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency ar City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vectation; and CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 one MOM-11asldaatlal*pp(Icstlaa/Flsaalop 8MsIaaSsctlaa ➢ WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of 10 feet wit the approval of the Agency or City. Location .f Ve.etated Corridor: IN ANY R` IDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate •wnership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and sha not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to • a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY i STRICT The WATER RESO RCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan d is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Spe 'fically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and ob ctive standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated r .avian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve nat e plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and onserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO •IEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "s. e harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions req►ire that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin Rive which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING ' TREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cui.c feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CR: K, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND :ALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" accord)ig to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry •ell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin Rive Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALL1" TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor b undary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEE unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modifi d in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlan ) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot `water quality buffer" is required under Unifie Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.85.0101 CITY Of11GAA0 Pre-Appllcation Contereace Notes Page t11 MOM2asldeaUslAalllcatlaa/fliaalal lheltlaa Sectlsa Riparian Setback Reductions The D 'ECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY M• OR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures .•r impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection fo 'dentified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement o iparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eli•ibili for Riparian etback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR • RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was ubstantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be bas on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all of the followin.. ➢ Native plant species currentl over less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently cove less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from •e on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed con .ry to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100- -ar floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not great- than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.1001 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS t c�` O D eec `S A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: g> Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-App[Icatlon Conference Motes Page 6 of le 11011-Iacllutlal Maticatlaa/Hg.alai UM:Isa Ssctlea MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: D A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. D If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: D The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. D The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(DI NARRATIVE The a PPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable . •proval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS — 18.80 _ 18.92 ,/ 18.102(81`15) / 18.116(1&') / 18.150 (c8'�) 18.84 ./ 18.96Z 1�.-1�p ✓ 18.106 1a-1Efi) ,./ 18.120((a• c 18.160 _ 18.85 V 18.98 .7 18.108 (,&to 18.130 18.162 _ 18.88 ,7 18.100 (k8-Z'F-t, ,/ 18.114( 13 ) _ 18.134 _/ 18.164 C«4-3(c) IMPACT STUDY As a rt of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to —__._J UDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501 CITY OF11GARD Pre-AApncation Conference Motes Pape 1 of 11 11111-1aslloatluAAlllcatln/Mualu IMilel Sactlou WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 EIGHBORHOOD MEETIN THE APPLI'ANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE APP'•"IATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE BCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) -- SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION I`Q13 TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are r ired-to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in ore o—ebtai a pprovaVreservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete unTi he receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) UILDING PERMITS PLAN -i OR G RL ATERL O lEW UNTIL A BUILDIN LAND USE AND APPROVAOTHER L E HAS BEEN D PE ISSUED.MITS WIL Final N inspectionT BE ACCEPTED approvals FOR by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED.) RECYCLING Sp licant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE ERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page t 6110 MOM;ulloaUal AspllcsUoa/fliaalaa OMsloa Sadao ADDITIIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: al ` cm6 PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPUCATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8W' x 11"_map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard vt.04AaitJ coc{►Uss,al . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF T1GAR0 Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 9 On MOM-Iullrrtlil Iliollcatler/Plsoalaa DMslar Ssct1oi • PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: \j\jT kg(2 -S CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE 15031639-4171 FAX: (503)084-7291 E-MAIL (staff's first name)4Ci.tigard.or.lS • k_vookNettykaistorikor p-cAst (Enelaetrle/Section:■estenbreeo7-c.eeol Wpdsts& 28-11A-911 CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Appncatlon Conference Notes Page 10 et 10 NON-IssUeutlel MptIcetleeiMuala9 Ohisloo Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES , ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION 'uMara Oregon mniy ent Shaping A Better Community 2-51 O\ A/\ PUBLIC FACILITIES e) The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( I to feet from centerline. (9c(14 f' �1 to. f R- c e —FADtus r feat from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street 'mprovements: ( street improvements will be necessary along (.904A- to include: [" (8 feet of pavement ►..n Roncrete curb Rorm sewers and other underground utilities fg/ -foot concrete sidewalk 1197street trees EK6treet signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. t" THE-, cct1t C V�k1�c N V -n t rLe��O� TM c s r&. l f' lJ C) iS 7 i ?l o? - q — > (-t t- -Cr, pi 111.5 ,455 sS4-^alw-f(- CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 EiulaeeNeg Iepertmeet Section t��(t‘1( _ street -ovements will be necessary along �� .�sK-L-+�► S� to include: [3' 1e, feet of pavement 0-4-3 -G.. [concrete curb [storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk [ treet trees -Ireet signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. • ( ) Section 18.164.120 of th-- igard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a develop - ent to be placed underground or, at the - do of the developer, a fee in-lieu of uno - grounding can be paid. This requireme 's valid a en if the utility lines are on the op••site side of the street from the site. If the -e in-lieu is p .posed, it is equal to $ 27.50 p- ineal foot of street frontage that contains e overhead line . T - e are existing overhead util y lines which n adjacent to this site a ong SW . Prior to , the applicant s II.either place these utilities underground, or pay the f:e in-I' u described above. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 EiuIneertag Department Sectloe - - In some cases, where street )rovements or other necessary pu' improvements are not currently practical, the improvements 1,..4 be deferred. In such cases, a ._.Idition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located "5v4 (.01 -TCt-+ t ;,max s+ia- . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to 1;,44m-,--1- S► pt3r> 6a f)fr k "50 �T C-643 ADJ.x (' 04 '�- �.• v 124 tS ("t om-`� (n ` I..�cL..-t.to Water Supply: q The �� VA WM�(c-- c -r. - Phone:(503) 2}4S '3V�I provides public water service in the area of th s site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed J development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. Dc 4•4A ArJ St 5 ` '�r-W ■.., SIB KrI v,l • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 EapineerinI Department Section to pay a fee in-lieu of const ing an on-site facility provided sf is criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. -Tv— � k 5 f sccu t R-Cp S4r-Ar1 SDP__ Aoput cArc,4-1 • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. CITY OF MAN Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4016 [epleeereny Department Section Compliance Agreeme CAP). This permit covers more r nsive work such as main utility 0 line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, tnis type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 ligleeering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR ZDIYISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: z9(16. ENGINEERING DEP.1'TMENT ST F Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031684-7291 h 1pa ttylma sterstipreapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 01-Sept-98 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engleeettntl Department Section CITY OF TIGARD A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ..,��;,., APPLICATION CHECKLIST ' 0 CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist Identifies what Is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: 1,A1--g Date: t opl i ii APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE 1 MARKED ITEMS 1 A) Application form (1 copy) , B) Owner's signature/written authorization �j C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed V 0) Applicant's statement No. of Copies ir� E) Filing Fee 'c, as c. ' f $ T --SIB Seale. II SITE-SPECIFIC MAPS)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies IC? ( 1. Vicinity map ar 2. Site size & dimensions V/ ' 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 6 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds fit 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: r' (a) Floodplain areas 0 . (b) Slopes in excess of 25% er (c) Unstable ground °' • (d) Areas with high seasonal water table V (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential Ge (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils Er ,Pt 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats ta' (b) Wetlands er 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings • A -' (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level e( .tip4 8. Location of existing structures and their uses cf rtjp, 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources a Pr 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 0 N Pc 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways 0" LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies C) ( 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties ¢' ✓ 2. Contour line intervals cV / 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties [,Y (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site sa' (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension /4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site ¢' (b) Parking and circulation areas Gt/ (c) Loading and services area y (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation cy (e) Outdoor common areas a" • (f) Above ground utilities t/ 75. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site V (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site v6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions - V V7. Sanitary sewer facilities V ✓ 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9' ✓9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ✓10. The location of mailboxes tz( N(/(11. The location of all structures and their orientation ? 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements • C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies (( The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: ✓ (a) General contour lines (7' (b) Slope ratios • (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) tY (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development 0' 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ta' (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals d (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ed LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Draw , Indicating: No. of Copies (a The site development plan proposal shall include: c 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site v 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies (( The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable ,i1P 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings �a gip(3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces p' ✓4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 9 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions d (b) Erosion control measures that will be used �( ✓F) Sign Drawings: Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. `14G1) G) Traffic Generation Estimate: E__X-°6QL)-16) )2' H) Pre ' ina Partition/Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1. The . ner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The own- 's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map sca - (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of p: cel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width an. names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adja = t to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanen •uildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water .urses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or g .ter caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easemen. ❑ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public sire- • (a) The proposed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any -serve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LANG USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 3 OF 3 I) Subdivision Prelimin Plat Map and Data Indicating: .4o. of Copies 1. tale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one p ase per sheet ❑ 2. Th roposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicin'ty map showing property's relationship to arterial and collect r streets ❑ 4. Names, ddresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, urveyer and designer (as applicable) o 5. Date of ap ication ❑ 6. Boundary lin s of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adja ent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parce of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines rel ed to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades eater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, Iocati , type and size of all the following (within and. adjacent to the propo ed subdivision): (a) Public and privat right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private •.nitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mai including fire hydrants a (d) Major power telephon • transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for par , open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles of • oposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicate• on the plans -- - ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distributi. system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydran a 12. Approximate centerline profiles showin: the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonab - distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision a 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street righ .f-way(s) a 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation .r storm water overflow a 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water nurses & drainage-ways a 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate lot •imensions and • lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purpos. other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. a 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or gr..ater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed ee plantings a 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location o .11 structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of wh. h structures are to remain after platting a 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements 0 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application • LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 4 OF 3 • • J) Solar Access Calculations: 14(A-- ❑ K) Other.Information No. of Copies ❑ • h:VogintpattyNtnastersV<idist.mst • May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 5 OF 5 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS DATE: /ts !�q PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE:/ COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS. CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NOADDRESS. LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 189.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 48.00 I/ OFFICE $ 174.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 182.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 79.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY. DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE r _ 7/a A, c1 -Afflef'/L C?FF?de TRIP RATE//o . 3/ BASIS: /9 PPL/ ,/7 //E4PO_ _-s Tp ,`'dNS77 LL T /g 4, ezra T 07c-Pi cF i3u / //VG CALCULATIONS: 179-41-`: _ %G.S.f x 97/crr. Tx/A gn E )C 49-TE /°672 7 'P - 4 . 0 X /6. 3 / ) /7 /. Tim = G .o x 16.3/ 97, P4 x /7y. 0-0 -1/7, pal. G5�_ j7� oat . o-) PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FE69/n e9aep. ore FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: Ar-524c 7 /3y M /eo.C3 E R Ts x/.5799 ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.. PREPARED BY: �Z. ... I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 19, 1999 TO: FILE: SDR 98-0024, Employer's Overload FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: Street Improvement Conditions-vs- LID Formation The following is a status of the conditions of approval related to street improvements: Condition Issue Status 6. Permit required if no LID formed Met(LID formed) 7. Compliance Agreement for permit Met (LID formed) 8. Construction vehicle parking Not Met 9. ROW dedication on 69th Avenue Not Met 10. Construct 69th if LID not approved Met (LID formed) 11. Construct Franklin if LID not approved Met (LID formed) 12. Profile of 69th Met (LID formed) 13. Permit from TVWD if LID not formed Met(LID formed) 14. Extend sewer in 69th if no LID Met(LID formed) 15. Water quality fee Not Met 16. Erosion control plan w/public impvts Met(LID formed) 17 — 19. Relate to final inspection Not Met c: Dick Bewersdorff Mark J. Roberts is eng\brianrlreports\sdr98-0024-statusmemo.doc PAGE 1 CITY OF TIGARD March 19, 1999 OREGON Tim Roth JT Roth Construction, Inc. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Tim: You requested clarification from the Director concerning acceptance of street improvement guarantees for Site Development Review (SDR) 98-0016 and SDR 98-0024. Please be advised that the Director considers the conditions fulfilled with the formation of the Local Improvement District (LID) for the public improvements involved in both developments. This compliments assurances and communication you have received from Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer. This letter, as well as Brian's will be appended to the project files. If you have any questions regarding the information in this letter, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 x316. Siricer - va) Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager is\curpin\dick\letters\Roth Const St Improvement Ltr.doc C: SDR 98-0016 and SDR 98-0024 Land use files Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer Mark Roberts, Associate Planner Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 March 16, 1999 Mr.Tim Roth J.T.Roth Construction,Inc. CITY OF TIGARD 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard,OR 97223 OREGON VIA FAX: 624-0239 RE: SDR 98-0016,ROTH OFFICE BUILDING 12755 SW 69TH AVENUE Dear Tim: Below is a brief status of the conditions of approval that relate to public facilities. Condition Issue Status 10. Permit for public improvements Not met* 11. Permit for public improvements Not met* 12. Construction vehicle parking Met 13. Street improvements in 69th Avenue Not met* 14. Non-remonstrance for 70th Avenue Not met** 15. Water permit from TVWD N/A(met) 16. Water quality facility design Met 17. Partial water quality fee Not met 18. Erosion control plan/public improvements Not met* 19—22 (all tied to fmal inspection) Not met. * Because the LID for SW 69th Avenue has been approved by City Council,I would consider these conditions to be met. In talking with Jim Hendry;it sounds like he would need to make a Director's Interpretation to consider them complete. Jim will get a copy of this letter. ** The applicant is responsible for obtaining the proper form from the City Hall customer service counter. You will need to indicate that you either want a"corporate","partnership"or"individual"form. If you have questions about this letter,please let me know. Sincerely, an D. Rager,P Development Review Engineer C: Gus Duenas,City Engineer Jim Hendryx,Community Development Director \4ig333\usr1dcpts\ng\briarukorrespondence\troth-03161999-69th doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 March 2, 1999 4040N1 f CITY OF TIGARD Mr. Tim Roth JT Roth Construction, Inc. OREGON 12600 SW 72°d Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0016, 12755 SW 69TH AVENUE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Dear Tim: I reviewed your letter to Gus Duenas,dated February 9, 1999,wherein you expressed concern about the public improvements associated with your proposed office building project. In the letter, it was stated that you have incurred approximately$2,000.00 in engineering costs for design of the half-street improvement on SW 69th Avenue adjacent to your site. The plans that were prepared by Compass Corporation were submitted to our office on December 18, 1998. On January 12, 1999, I contacted Bruce Goldson with Compass _ Corporation via fax indicating that we needed copies of letters or transmittals indicating Compass has sent the plans to the various utility companies for their review and comment. We did indicate that we would begin the plan review. However, on that same day, January 12, 1999, I later called Bruce Goldson and we discussed the pending LID on SW 69th Avenue and the fact that your site would likely be included. I expressed to Bruce that I was concerned about spending our time and money, as well as your time and money in a plan review if your site would be included in the LID. That same week, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss whether or not the City should continue to pursue the LID. I suggested to Bruce that we hold off on reviewing your plans until after the neighborhood meeting,hoping that we would have some indication as to whether or not there would be at least 50%of the affected property owners in support of the LID. My thinking was that if the affected properties supported the LID,there would be a very good chance that the LID would be supported by the City Council. Bruce agreed with my reasoning and said that he would let me know if you had any concerns about taking this course or action. Until I saw the letter, dated February 9, 1999, I did not know that you had the concerns you listed. As you are aware, there was general support for the LID from the affected property owners and the City has moved forward to recommend the formation of the LID to City Council. In talking with Gus today about the City Council meeting last night, it appears there is a reasonable chance the LID will be formed. Therefore, I am reluctant to review your plans, as it appears it would be wasted effort. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 Mr. Tim Roth March 2, 1999 Page 2 You asked if your project will be held up because of the LID. This is a valid question. My recommendation would be that we handle your situation in like fashion to what we have done with the Specht Development approval (SDR 98-0014), wherein we included the following as a condition related to final building inspection: "Prior to a final building inspection, the LID improvements shall be substantially complete. For reference, "substantial completion" means that all of the underground utilities are installed and tested, street lights are installed and ready to be energized, and the paving for the streets is completed. In the event the LID improvements are delayed beyond the contract completion date, this condition will not prevent the issuance of temporary occupancy permits, provided the applicant has submitted a temporary access plan that is acceptable to the City Engineer and as long as other public facilities are functioning to serve the buildings." We would essentially extend the same option to you, in the event the LID improvements are delayed as mentioned in the above condition. I hope this letter clarifies our actions with regard to the public improvements adjacent to your site. If you have any questions,please let me know. Sincerely, Brian D. Rager, PE Development Review Engineer C: Gus Duenas, City Engineer Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director Bruce Goldson, Compass Corporation, VIA FAX: 653-9095 \tig333\usr depts\eng\bnanr\correspondence\02241999-timroth-69thsdr.bdr.doc RECD MAR 04 1999 G,\oc 14' ch 1, 1999 s\e-��r City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Mr. Jim Hendryx RE: 69th Street LID/SDR 98-0016 / SDR 98-0024 Mr. Hendryx: My issues are being addressed to you as I understand you are the authority to respond to these as land-use issues. The prior correspondence(see attached dated Feb. 9, 1999) was addressed to the City Engineer, Mr. Gus Duenas, as the points are referred to in the SDR decision as engineering issues. First, regarding SDR 98-0016: A"Notice of Decision"was issued on Dec. 10, 1998 whereas I was conditioned to perform certain off-site improvements. These improvements were to be completed and approved prior to the issuance of a final building inspection. We have completed the off-site improvement drawings and submitted them to the City of Tigard for plan check and approval on Dec. 17, 1998. I have recently learned that these same improvements may be included in a proposed LID and since I have not received any follow up written correspondence from the City instructing otherwise I must assume the responsibility of the improvements stays with me and not the LID. Since 2 months have past and I have not yet received notice from the City regarding my plan check I am beginning to wonder just where the project stands. Please inform me of my liability to perform these improvements as conditions in the SDR? Also, please advise me as to what the status of the plan check is? Regarding the same SDR, I have further concerns that if the off-site work is assigned to the LID and the LID work is not fully completed when my project is, will that be a cause of delay in the issuance of my final occupancy? Second, regarding SDR 98-0024 This SDR was issued with conditions that should the proposed LID not be approved that I would be conditioned to perform the improvements. My question is the same as above: should I complete my on-site improvements and the off-site is performed as the result of the LID and my on-site is completed prior to the completion of the LID improvements, will my project be delayed in the issuance of the final occupancy? I apprec'• • your attention to these issues and a written response addressing each. Re s.:A . . ' •t► Jr. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard,Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — 4et CITY OF TIGARD OREGON March 23, 1999 Tim Roth J. T. Roth Construction, Inc. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 98-0024 — Access Easement Condition of Approval #4 Dear Tim: This is in response to your memo dated March 19, 1999. You asked for comments on the format of your draft easement. After reviewing the easement, Brian Rager, the City's Development Review Engineer and I agree that this format would be acceptable to the City in satisfying SDR 98-0024, Condition of Approval #4. When the easement and legal description have been finalized, please submit a copy to the City for final review and approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 x315. Sincer- , Mark J. Roberts Associate Planner I:\curpin\mark\sdr\sdr98-24.1etl.doc c: SDR 98-0024 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 . .JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 19 '99 13:34 P.01/04 Jax memo From: Tim Roth To: Mark J. Roberts—City Planner . J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard 12600 S.W. 72"d suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 . CCB #31700 503/639-2639 Date: Mar. 19 19 99 . 503/624-0239 fax Total pages(including cover) 4 . RE: SDR 98-0024 -#4 S.W. 69th and Franklin - 251 01 AA 8300 Please find attached a copy of an easement for access and driveway to be applied to the subject property. I will be adding a legal description and attaching a site drawings as additional documents however those are being completed by the civils engineer. I would appreciate your review and written comments regarding the use of this specific form. If this says what you want it to I will copy you the final form with the legal and site drawing for approval before recording. • JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 19 '99 13 35 P.02/04 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard,Or.97223 File No. NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT EASEMENT FOR ACCESS and DRIVEWAY FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON ADJOINING PARCELS COMMERCIAL USE Date: , 19 Grantors: J.T.Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth 13779 SW Charleston Ln. Tigard, Or. 97224 RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner in fee simple of several parcels of land described as: Parcel 1: 2S101AA 8301; Lot 5, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington Co., State of Oregon. Parcel 2: 2S101AA 8300; Lots 1,2,3,4,9,10 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel 3: 2S101 AA 8200 Lots 6,7,8,36,35 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. and said parcels of real estate adjoin each other. WHEREAS,the Grantor of this Agreement desires to create a common driveway and access easement, described below, on Lots 5, 36, 35, 9 and 10 for the benefit of the public for driveway purposes for the benefit of Lots 1,2, 3,4, 5,6, 7,8, 9, 10, 35, and 36 of Block 29, West Portland Heights, County of Washington, State of Oregon. (Parcels 1, 2, and 3 above) GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor hereby grants and conveys, from the date of the conveyance, an easement for a common driveway in favor of each of the Parcels of this Agreement over the other Parcels above described real estate for the benefit of the Grantor and future owners of the Parcels,the easement being described as follows: JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 19 '99 13:36 P. 03/04 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT A parcel of land in Block 29, West Portland Heights, a duly recorded plat recorded in Book 1, Page 56, Washington County Plat Records, said parcel lying in the N.E. 1/4 of Section 1,T.2S., R.1 W.,W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: bAL C t v' � IMM1 t,j Said easement contains 5,400 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. "DRIVEWAY PURPOSES" DEFINED Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress and egress of motor vehicles, pedestrians, and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property. MAINTENANCE The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the in ownership of the Parcels described in this.Agreement. EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties hereto in their respective servient estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land_ )T ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 19 '99 13 36 P.04/04 Easement for Driveway Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above written. GRANTOR: By: J. T.Roth, Jr. Theresa A. Roth STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this day of , 1995 Personally appeared the within named J.T. ROTH, Jr. and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this day of , 1995 Personally appeared the within named THERESA A. ROTH and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before: Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: Easement for Driveway Page 3 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 19, 1999 TO: FILE: SDR 98-0024, Employer's Overload FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: Street Improvement Conditions -vs- LID Formation The following is a status of the conditions of approval related to street improvements: Condition Issue Status 6. Permit required if no LID formed Met(LID formed) 7. Compliance Agreement for permit Met(LID formed) 8. Construction vehicle parking Not Met • 9. ROW dedication on 69th Avenue Not Met 10. Construct 69th if LID not approved Met(LID formed) 11. Construct Franklin if LID not approved Met(LID formed) 12. Profile of 69`h Met(LID formed) 13. Permit from TVWD if LID not formed Met(LID formed) 14. Extend sewer in 69th if no LID Met(LID formed) 15. Water quality fee Not Met 16. Erosion control plan w/public impvts Met(LID formed) 17 — 19. Relate to final inspection Not Met c: Dick Bewersdorff Mark J. Roberts iAengtbrianr reportslsdr9 8-0024-statusmemo.doc PAGE 1 . JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 31 '99 8:59 P.01/05 RECEIVED PLANNING Jax APR 61999 CITY OF TIGARD From: Tim Roth To: Mark J.Roberts—City Planner . J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard 12600 S.W. 72'd suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 . Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 . CCB #31700 503/639-2639 Date: Mar. 31 19 99 . 503/624-0239 fax Total pages(including cover) 5 . RE: SDR 98-0024 -#4 S.W. 691 and Franklin - 2S1 01 AA 8300 Please find attached a copy of a complete easement for access and driveway document. I would appreciate your final review before recording. di / ' • I , r. • Please... EROUTING T RiQUESTK Read To: � I Handle KL Q L-0,5 Approve Gcrt(s (1.x-tom .n f And... Forward ‘1. (-'Return Nis 'r° `T ¢ �(1� I I Keep or Recycle Mr_. i c,-cr I Review with Me From: 1` ( Post-it®7664©3M 1995 ) Date: (`19 ID`S �S `� d' ��'�� 4. G J oaf i s a 41 racks Govd 75,4- 91-) . JT ROTH COAST Fax:5036240239 Mar 31 '99 8:59 P.02/05 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: CTIY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Or.97223 File No. NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT EASEMENT FOR ACCESS and DRIVEWAY FOR.MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON ADJOINING PARCELS COMMERCIAL USE Date: April , 19 99 Grantor: J.T.Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth 13779 SW Charleston Ln. Tigard, Or. 97224 RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner in fee simple of several parcels of land described as: Parcel 1: 2S101AA 8301; Lot 5, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington Co., State of Oregon. Parcel 2: 2S101AA 8300; Lots 1,2,3,4,9,10 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel 3: 2S101AA 8200 Lots 6,7,8,35,36 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel 4: 2S101AA8500 Lots 33,34 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. and said parcels of real estate adjoin each other. WHEREAS, the Grantor of this Agreement desires to create a common driveway and access easement, described below,on Lots 5,9, 10, 34,35 and 36 for the benefit of the public for driveway purposes to benefit Lots 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, 10, 33, 34, 35,and 36 of Block 29, West Portland Heights, County of Washington, State of Oregon. (Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 above) GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor hereby grants and conveys, from the date of the conveyance, an easement for a common driveway in favor of each of the Parcels of this Agreement over the other Parcels above described real estate for the benefit of the Grantor and future owners of the Parcels, the easement being described as follows: Easement for Driveway Page 1 JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 31 '99 9:00 P. 03/05 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT A parcel of land in Block 29, West Portland Heights, a duly recorded plat recorded in Book 1, Page 56,Washington County Plat Records, said parcel lying in the N.E. 1/4 of Section 1,T.2S., R.1 W.,Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 AND RUNNING THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF,EAST,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 24.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, SOUTH 138.00 FEET;THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35,EAST, 76.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOTS 35 AND 34, SOUTH,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 34,WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 34 AND 35,NORTH, 35.00 FEET; THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 2.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10, WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF;THENCE,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 10 AND 9,NORTH,24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 3.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9,EAST, 100.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,NORTH 103.00 FEET TO THE POINT-OF—BEGINNING. Said easement contains 8,112.00 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. "DRIVEWAY PURPOSES" DEFINED Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress and egress of motor vehicles, pedestrians, and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property. MAINTENANCE The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the parties in ownership of the Parcels described in this Agreement. EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties hereto in their respective servient estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land. Easement for Driveway Page 2 - JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 31 '99 9:01 P.04/05 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above written. GRANTOR: By: By: J. T. Roth,Jr. Theresa A. Roth STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this day of , 1995 Personally appeared the within named J.T. ROTH, Jr. and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this day of , 1995 Personally appeared the within named THERESA A.ROTH and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before: Notary Public for Oregon My commission expitt3: Easement for Driveway Page 3 • JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Mar 31 '99 9:01 P.05/05 5. W. FR A K L I IJ ST (8018. • 25 25 25 25 ; " vt' ► 25 25 25 �// ///1 Lid ; o 4 , 54 7 wo 2 3 ,� 1 .., 6 8 Q / /j I/ Q r I a0 F 1 :iin _J. J. .1._ ; v_./i- _1_ I_ tie' 7 J 36 ...i co \9 '''' 2 i/ 1 /& ./z„too' r {/: ; ,0 lo .-. 7', , "tyy,w/i/ i i /, I. i/ /////' 't.; iv I 1 - ---1 N 12 33 r''' 0 N 2-•-9 . ,... t in N ■ J I 30 N " --- -- ..--- — I smi JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 15 '99 16:38 P.01/05 Jax memo From: Tim Roth To Julia Hajduk IT. Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard 12600 S.W. 7rd suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 . Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 . CCB #31700 503/639-2639 Date: Aprill5 19 99 503/624-0239fc Total pages(including cover) 5 RE: 12755:$.W. 69th SDR 98-0016 12540 SW 69th SDI.98-0024 In response die fax memo received 4-12-99. Changed the:trees located,at the Waverly property to include Incense Cedar. Changed Maple's on 72°d street frontage to Thundercloud and cedars along back property line to Incense Cedar. Would like to get them planted as soon as possible,please fax me an approval so I can get this done with Respect J.T. Roth,1/47r. JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Hpr 15 '99 lb:66 1J.U2/u5 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: LT.Roth CGStr.etio.,lac 12600 Sw 72"0200 Tit.rb,Or.97223 File No_ . NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT • DEED RESTRICTION FORME MITIGATION OF TREE REMOVABLE AND REPLACEMENT Date: April 5 , 19 99 Grantor: Michael S. Zoucha 16676 SW 88t Pl. Tigard, Or. 97224 DEED RESTRICTION The trees shown on the attached exhibit will be maintained in perpetuity as mitigation for tree removal in the City of Tigard at 16676 SW 88th Place, Tigard, Or. 97224. This deed restriction shall not preclude removal of trees as the result of natural causes such as disease, decay, wind or danger to persons or property as long as they are replaced. The above causes shall be certified by an arborist prior to\approvaL p/I nflh~) IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above written. By: M�I J By: 'Michael . cba. STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this J day of , 1999 Personally appeared the within named Michael S. Zoucha and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his.voluntary act and deed. Before : p� k� Notary Public for Oregon\Y11JLC '1" My commission expires: 4113/)1�i e.q31- OFFICIAL SEAL THERESA ROTH NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.059388 MT COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 30.2000 JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 15 '99 16=39 I .U3/U5 • • -4(11[..)- • ': . , 1L04 5•w•83t1) CITY OF TIGARI WAVERLY ESTATE, LOT 2 142 S 89'. 8'48' W— r - ... — 108.QS• --+- — — — - -7-"•-•!....../0.0-3 I ` \‘`� SEWER AND STORM ��'00• W 14e1 1, I ... ORAINAaE MAINTENANCE I ``' I ANC ACCESS EASEMENT =� I I — --.�� I 3 �. I 148 . a:c 25' ESMT. I•to • col. f ' , � LOWER FLOOR 150 - \, ' 1`� EL.143.0' 1 `� 1 142 16Z I.,\ Qi: I S �"�t• I, . I �. I z 1•X13 rose, t-P r' F3_,e•` , .. ......11 6 • 1 148 4' CONC. '... 7 ti DRIVEWAY �1 l W p (3.500 PSI) - 150 0 17 ! �- 1 t50 b F ` N 89'58'48" E — J___ 152 \ cn 50700'0 2' ASR 11'VERN RIO 0 CcaAR _ 1D c. •. - . . . - - • - . . . - . . _ JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Rpr 15 '99 16:39 1 .04/05 • RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: J.T_Roil Cousuicgon,lac. 12400 SW 72-I#204 Tigard,Or.97223 File No. . NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT _ DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE MITIGATION OF TREE REMOVABLE AND REPLACEMENT Date: April 5 . 19 99 Grantor: J. T. Roth,Jr. 12600 SW 72nd Tigard, Or. 97223 DEED RESTRICTION The trees shown on the attached exhibit will be maintained in perpetuity as mitigation for tree removal in the City of Tigard at 12600 SW 72nd, Tigard, Or. 97223. This deed restriction shall not preclude removal of trees as the result of natural causes such as disease, decay, wind or danger to persons or property as long as they are replaced. The above causes shall be certified by an arborist prior to approval IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above Ailv GRA %1' By: MI' y'9• By. .T. • o i Jr. STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of 000°` ` ) ) Dated this 5 day of , 1999 Personally appeared the within named J.T.Roth,Jr. and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary Public for OregonL)hNt4ak,�044... My commission expires: ' yl)I OD ir-- 1.,,,...,:-..7..77.,171;1 - ;:•., '^_4l SE4t uv rrsitA' Ii,r•!►YAr.FS AUG 31.2000 JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 15 '99 16:40 F'.05/05 . ......1. k .......... . . . . L..... ...___ __..... , . •• ,.......... . , „:„ , . . ____ d.- 777 —sC — ” .. .,.. - _ _ S.W. 72ND AVE. _ (� / , 9 :' _ v z z _ _ _— — -- — — _f _ G'. _ / I : :'.: • 13999 140,013\ — — 169.9/ ( 70 A 1, l■ 11$ d -10 v 4 -►'.•• L 1% . t 1 - . >i--� _ . • y 13 •AF)A 0.43 ACS I . \--LE.a.IV� \ \ - 1 l it, ' GALi PAR �� A/G PAR��rtjr / Ior 10 • '- Prr�•.v :•.:CLr.sr:�ra .-17..,+-dc_r cta uc% } •, 1 tD . . �ai-i.� - 9 . —•,P 1 f. • I .. O 2 t_AL.1PER E ,i/ 14 E$ CGbAZ ' io * r - Fcr : , • - / ..." -ral-A.I.. - 1_9 i . - 1-.Z _ s _ 1 , 1 I \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ 6th': Q~ ( 700 I ' I I : // / / / n/// s� 4 A�rtk3 1� i u 1 r. 9 PhrtaMCS �A \ a / y`^)' ' . A C-1 ,v �..P V.I.Q.�,� 11 \ I * L"' 1...1.3'........."- W ''.T.-S,........„ >.k Go r Ii u 4 v 4 1 T' I- — -Za� • :- E1! P�r . , NO '.\,140.10 -I 9_0_0 0 0_Q -0 QG�.7.701 Q___00 l ,'` I, 1n'!=Arm Q a -^� Al SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: 77;4g Company: f7' 1Qo�h Phone: 6 3,_,2 6 3� Fax: 6�y � 3q From: T/4 �d�� Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 Date: 9=2 -y'9 Pages including this page: / COMMENTS: �� tt �� t 'X �� Gvi�T�e.7 /1o1iflc9�lb� /,�` £ rev,_E0 --fieet 2 9/74. deed 7es-h c6P:7 ,c /e0/ %r,//S /5W a e gceetkik - � co/Wec/ Gr' //c 7.re'eS�/,' d Gt./// CoLh /A/qr�/a,'/' ryt//407 7/7"'� rr�� gq � Pley.e�io�."de pis /cc c ��5 e�re r� � � 5-2)/2 7i, 9 Svc< CJ/Ocv n/ aclo/a/nq/i9• 7471:5 "ce:Z City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** MEMORANDUM r TO: Julia Hajduk FROM: Mark Touhey RE: J. T. Roth Construction, Inc. DATE: April 8, 1999 Per our earlier telephone conversation regarding information for Roth Constructio, on the 72nd Street side, planting in line with the existing Photina is a good idea, but the size of a mature Acer Platanoides (Emerald Queen) is 50 feet in height with a spread of 40 feet which would be in the power lines on 72nd Avenue and on Beveland Street. Option f8 Jaws: • Acer Ezestre - Easy Street T"" 40' by 20' • Acer Platanoides — Parkway Maple 40' by 25' • Acer Platanoides Columnar — Columnar Norway Maple 35' by 15' • Prunus Cerasifera —Thundercloud, Krauter Vesvius, Newport 25' by 20' • Carpinus Betulus Fastigiata 35' by 20' Pyramidal European Hornbean — Good in adverse conditions The row of Western Red Cedars on the back of the property are ok, however I would like to suggest Incense Cedar which would not grow as wide and spread over the driveway and adjoining property. The Waverly Estates site looks like USA property which is landscaped. A possibility would be to blend Red Cedars into existing landscape with USA's approval? If you have questions you can reach me at 639-4171, extension 423 Thanks! Kathylparks\roth construction JT RUTH CUNST Fax:5036240239 Rpr 5 '99 9:32 P. 01/05 Jax mento From: Tim Roth To: _Dick Bewersdorff J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard 12600 S.W. 72'd suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 _ Tigard, Or 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 . CCB #31700 503/639-2639 Date: April 5 19 99 . 503/624-0239 fax Total pages(including cover) 5 . RE: 12755 S.W. 69th SDR 98-0016 -Conditions of Approval# 3 12540 SW 69th SDR 98-0024 - Conditions of Approval# 5 The above SDR mitigation plans require a total of 74 caliper inches to be replaced (mitigated), 51" for SDR 98-0024 and 23" for SDR 98-0016. I have attached the 'Deed Restriction" document along with a site plan for two properties inside the City limits of Tigard for replacement trees to be planted. -The first property located at 16676 SW 88`h Place is owned by Michael S. Zoucha, located in the Waverly Estates subdivision. This property is adjacent to the old dairy farm that was purchased by U.S.A. and being development by same The original plat created a 25' landscape buffer with minimal planting and the owner has requested additional trees to aid in the buffering of the U.S.A. development project. -The second site is property that I own located at 12600 SW 72°d. I would desire to create a planting of trees along the easterly property line to screen the property to the east. The adjacent property is a house converted to an office with a large rocked back yard used for parking and a screening of trees will aid in a long term buffering for the improvements on my property. In addition, I currently have some plantings of photinias along the street with no trees and would desire to add the trees to enhance the visual impact of the property from SW 72nd Please let me know as soon as possible so that I can get the trees planted while we are still in the good spring planting season_ :. ice � hot , Jr_ JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 5 '99 9:33 P.02/05 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: J_T.Roth Co.strwctioa,lac. 12600 SW 72"k200 Tigard,Or.97223 File No. NO CHANGE TN TAX STATEMENT DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE MITIGATION OF TREE REMOVABLE AND REPLACEMENT Date: April 5 19 99 Grantor: Michael S. Zoucba 16676 SW 88th PL Tigard, Or.97224 DEED RESTRICTION The trees shown on the attached exhibit will be maintained in perpetuity as mitigation for tree removal in the City of Tigard at 16676 SW 88th Place, Tigard, Or. 97224. This deed restriction shall not preclude removal of trees as the result of natural causes such as disease, decay, wind or danger to persons or property as long as they are replaced The above causes shall be certified by an arborist prior to approval IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above written. B y� By: Michael . acha. STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss- County of Ikathvp.41 ) Dated this 5 day of , 1999 Personally appeared the within named Michael S. Zoucha and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary Public for Oregon\-.){rl 1,-, \ My commission expires: cal I OFFICIAL SEAL THERESA ROTH 'fie~ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON .'. COMMISSION NO.056388 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 40;2000 JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 5 '99 9:34 P.03/05 e- . . 1L1.74. S.w.BSt-P/ CITY OF TIGARC WAVERLY ESTATES LOT 2C I 1 1 142 S 59•58'45" W 109.04' N Via`9•t 1MP `��` SEWER AND STORM �2'a0' , W • tae "r\ 1 �. ; DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE I f I . ~ - ...�� o AND ACCESS EASEMENT-4i 1 3 �tae �� .•.--- I■ '� I 8' T. '" .` :" ilir 1 ^I, l i' ` 7I 8. r H b 11 ( LOWER FLOOR 1 150 � .� _ --_ El.•ta3.p' ` 142 ' I • `'�` ' 1(∎ 1 ,� AIN FLOOR. ' �• . .162 � I v,IISa a ■ •E53.0. I _ ` M ,a I fi . .0„....."... . I b I "4 r ' -- eGii .b'•• ' _ 2 1 J.28, c; T ...f 146 ._ 4" CONC. I 14 1 u,�_ 4 DRIVEWAY 71 c .61 14.500 PSI) 148 0 yQ c ( 160 1 '41 ♦ _ N 89`58'48" E 152 v� —10—.0E--"-- 0.00' c. 1► 0 • 2° CALIPER . .ssSTERN RED O 0 C( 4R } JT ROTH CONST Fax:5036240239 Apr 5 '99 9:34 P.04/05 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: 4.7.Rats Coastruc!Ioi,Inc. 12600 SW 72'd#200 Tigard,Or.97223 File No. NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE MITIGATION OF TREE REMOVABLE AND REPLACEMENT Date: April 5 , 19 99 Grantor J. T. Roth,Jr. 12600 SW 72nd Tigard, Or. 97223 DEED RESTRICTION The trees shown on the attached exhibit will be maintained in perpetuity as mitigation for tree removal in the City of Tigard at 12600 SW 72nd, Tigard, Or. 97223. This deed restriction shall not preclude removal of trees as the result of natural causes such as disease, decay, wind or danger to persons or property as long as they are replaced. The above causes shall be certified by an arborist prior to approvaL IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above a. By: �i ■ . By: .T. 'o Jr. STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss_ County of ( 06Ciwi l` ) Dated this S day of , 1999 Personally appeared the within named J.T.Roth,Jr. and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary Public for Oregon ,DkUnL. — My commission expires: 'D) OD J�1•J SEAL iM rig _ :-1EFIES"ROTH 'J�. i��'�.V.•i i::).CE63B8 ..v nnt•ucerLr.l Z.VS!!"rC &Ha 911 anon JT ROTH CONST Fax Apr 5 '99 9:35 P.05/05......... . ,,,, .. . .__. _ ___, ,,, .„, T?_ / `v S S W. 7�ND AVE. v / c , — y 169.99' (70.0¢ - � ,, - .\ • .1 140.02)N' •1;. • -'e 'Al . .. e,_ • .'. h sift Sri S-1• n , I A� P��A,.30%vES . . _ \--\\5 •A ,NG . :ck • Lac_ ND I I 5a* - `t, 2- �u Pa 'WS . ` _rode La01xItt3 s40, 6Ra.U� avEEIJ . • ` I• /NA"?LE . '• -,"• Z'ati-x•- - 9 i,� j I x . ,.�: _ SP - . • .L,.._47_,,,, O 2,Z GAU PER r�� 1 Es~c12r1 b CSR - d i _ < !• LiLi : J{-'<Rr Gd ? / , _t_a_r.....,_ ... A23 /sc�«= i / X10 . .._______ _ y T r I - PARK' i\n=`� ' =fCL,rG_ - - I - 1 zno I am y 41_Li I ' . L 1 4r^/ ;/ -3§ s A $ 0 d / \ \ \ 1 yC, r. i • q PARiar� A \. .\ b�^ u 6 ...) i C___,/ 7"---...r......i. i4af..Jt1�. . I�� . _ LP 1 ti. is _P i t J 1:. 3 . � � _r. _ `f u> 4> I r 1- y NR; , I . • _ t • 1401 \ 1 _ _. / O_e9 O p o O OO-O_ 0e...6.r O_s4O _ 1 —_,r • u, to CENZF R. , I RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: J.T.Roth CGastractioa,lac 12600 Sw 72-181200 Tigard,Or.97223 File No_ NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE MITIGATION OF TREE REMOVABLE AND REPLACEMENT Date: April 5 , 19 99 Grantor; Michael S. Zoucha 16676 SW 88t P1. Tigard, Or 97224 DEED RESTRICTION The trees shown on the attached exhibit will be maintained in perpetuity as mitigation for tree removal in the City of Tigard at 16676 SW 88th Place,Tigard, Or. 97224. This deed restriction shall not preclude removal of trees as the result of natural causes such as disease, decay,wind or danger to persons or property as long as they are replaced. The above causes shall be certified by an arborist prior to approvaL V 1'- ^r. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above written. G ' ThR: By: , l t �..� By: Michael :. ctn. STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of , ) Dated this J day of , 1999 Personally appeared the within named Michael S. Zoucha and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his_voluntary act and deed. Before : Notary.Public for OregonvYltNt�'�'1"�"'� My commission expires: c 3p, OFFICIAL SEAL .:• ; THERESA ROTH. NOTARY PUBIJC•OREGON COMMISSION NO.058388 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 30,2000 -E:1 -. - j4.1..74. 5.w.83tT CITY OF TIOAR1 WAVERLY ESTATE LOT 2 3 y .. 1at S 89'38'48' W_ _ ` _ r �� 108.08' ` H ?.0..7 SEWER AND STORM ��'00• w a 1 ORAINACE MAINTENANCE I 1 �� b AND ACCESS EASEMENT—=•' I 1 I 168 �-- �� r��... ._ . u r I ) II 25' ESMT.`` ' 1 cf,r -�1 114d' �c cal. I , I LOWER FLOOR •ffi0 �. .. I �� EL-0413.0' --_1 1- .. I fat ---� I62 •.\ \ 1 .... :MAIN FLOOR ., 144 L... . -�� E1a153-0' H -I�_ `�-,...i. , tit' �_ QlyitAG •' I I .ice S f �`��' .... � .. I . i zl ca - .. 4' CONC. 146 DRIVEWAY N ti » o •13.500 PSII •• A t<8 0 ---rt. . c N 89-58a8,. E - 152 cn 50.00' T 0 2' CIUP£R O 5 it tc .. 2_1_,_4(e.se_ c_e.bmt .4.,„1. b II'E3'TERN Rf0 ' MAR • .. . . . .. . „ _ • . • _. .. . " CITY OW TIGARD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 639-4171 TMPnPT? NT PERMIT NOTICE ht: gall Check # 03 - .7/ d J T ROTH 12600 SW 72ND AVE SUITE 200 TIGARD OR 97223 Parcel t 25101AA-06300 Site Address : 12540 SW 69TH AVE Subdivision. : WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS Block • Lot : 029 —Jurisdiction : TIG Zoning : MUE Remarks : New parking lot and landscaping. This letter is to confirm receipt of your Site Work or Building permit appli- cation which has been forwarded to the plans examiner today for review. As a reminder, the associate land use cases) is/are : T -Or�7 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case (s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person (s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans ARE NOT routed to the planning or engineering departments. You must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your site work or building permit will NOT be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact me directly at 639-4171 for further clarification. Sincerely, ((6://,:xl D velopment Services Technician cc: Building Department Planning Department Engineering Department JT ROTH CONST cax:5036240239 Apr 21 '99 .,14:52 P.01/01 Sax memo From: Tim Roth To: Julia Hajduk ..TT Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard 12600 S.W. 72"d suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 . Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 CCB#31700 503/639-2639 Date: April,21 19 99 . 503/624-0239 fax Total pagcs(including cover) 1 . RE: 12755 S_W_ 69th SDR 98-0016 12540 SW 69th SDR 98-0024 In response to your memo dated 4-21-99 The mitigation requirements are: 51" for the development project located at 12540 SW 691h—SDR 98-0024 23" for the development project located at 12755 SW 69th- SDR 98-0016 74" Total The deed restriction and site plans identify 9/2"caliper trees(total of 18 caliper inches)to be planted at 16676 SW 88th Place and 28/2"caliper trees(total of 56 caliper inches)to be planted at 12600 SW 7213a. Please apply the 18 caliper inches being planted at 16676 SW 88'h PL to SDR 98-0016, the balance.or S6 caliper inches being planted at 12600 SW 7?'would apply to both SDR 98-0016 and SDR 98-0024. N Re ;,41%, r. i' RECEIVED APR 2 2 1999 Mezzo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT From: Tim Roth To: Mark Roberts . J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Company: City of Tigard . 12600 S.W. 72n1 suite 200 Phone#: 639-4171 . Tigard, Or. 97223 Fax#: 684-7297 . CCB #31700 503/639-2639 Date: April 21 19 99 . 503/624-0239 fax RE: 12540 S.W. 69th SDR 98-0024 Revisions have been made to the application to satisfy the conditions of approval as follows: Condition# 1: Street tree spacing has been adjusted to 22' centers, species is approved per City of Tigard Triangle Standards with spreading dimensions as note in Standards. see page 2 "Landscape"plan 2. Bicycle rack has been noted on"Site"plan page 1. 3. On-site sidewalks are noted to be 6"higher than finish grade of AC paving. see "Site"plan page 1 4. Reciprocal easement has been reviewed and approved by City, copy of document with recording number has been attached herein. 5. A tree mitigation plan has been submitted and approved. A"Deed Restriction" document with two separate site plans attached, showing the plantings of trees and their species, has been created and approved by City. Currently waiting response from Julia Hajduk or Dick Bewersdorph <° authorizing me to record documents and plant trees. 2�? ✓ t 6, 7 •,-10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16: These conditions are satisfied by the approved LID. 8: Construction vehicle access and parking has been noted on revised "Site" plan, • ;�`' see attached. 6''cri\" 9. Water quality fee is to be paid at the time site permit is issued. Sine-AR . dry ,'oth r. J.T. Re Construction, Inc. 5bt._ ‘ e?-00.4i/ RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: J.T.Roth,Jr. 13779 SW 72°"#200 Tigard,Or.97223 'J File No. 9 q o o f Y2- . NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT EASEMENT FOR ACCESS and DRIVEWAY FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVEWAY ON ADJOINING PARCELS COMMERCIAL USE Date: April, 19 99 Grantor: J.T. Roth, Jr. and Theresa A. Roth 13779 SW Charleston Ln. Tigard, Or. 97224 RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner in fee simple of several parcels of land described as: Parcel 1: 2S101AA 8301; Lot 5, Block 29, West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington Co., State of Oregon. Parcel 2: 2S101AA 8300; Lots 1,2,3,4,9,10 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel 3: 2S101AA 8200 Lots 6,7,8,35,36 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. Parcel 4: 2S101AA8500 Lots 33,34 West Portland Heights, City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon. and said parcels of real estate adjoin each other. WHEREAS,the Grantor of this Agreement desires to create a common driveway and access easement, described below, on Lots 5, 9, 10, 34, 35 and 36 for the benefit of the public for driveway purposes to benefit Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, 10, 33, 34, 35, and 36 of Block 29, West Portland Heights, County of Washington, State of Oregon. (Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 above) GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor hereby grants and conveys, from the date of the conveyance, an easement for a common driveway in favor of each of the Parcels of this Agreement over the other Parcels above described real estate for the benefit of the Grantor and future owners of the Parcels, the easement being described as follows: Easement for Driveway Page 1 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT A parcel of land in Block 29, West Portland Heights, a duly recorded plat recorded in Book 1, Page 56, Washington County Plat Records, said parcel lying in the N.E. 1/4 of Section I,T.2S., R.1 W., Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5 AND RUNNING THENCE, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, EAST, 24.00 FEET; THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 24.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, SOUTH 138.00 FEET;THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 35,EAST, 76.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF; THENCE,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOTS 35 AND 34, SOUTH, 24.00 FEET; THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 12.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 34, WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 34 AND 35,NORTH, 35.00 FEET; THENCE, PARALLEL WITH AND 2.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10, WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE THEREOF; THENCE, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOTS 10 AND 9,NORTH, 24.00 FEET;THENCE,PARALLEL WITH AND 3.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9,EAST, 100.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;THENCE, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,NORTH 103.00 FEET TO THE POINT-OF—BEGINNING. Said easement contains 8,112.00 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. "DRIVEWAY PURPOSES" DEFINED Driveway purposes as used in this easement means that all vehicles shall use or travel across the right-of-way described above for purposes of ingress and egress of motor vehicles, pedestrians, and uses incidental to any lawful use of the property. MAINTENANCE The easement described above shall be maintained in good repair by the parties in ownership of the Parcels described in this Agreement. EASEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties hereto in their respective servient estate so created and the parties further agree that it is a covenant that shall run with the land. Easement for Driveway Page 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement the date and year above l'tt GRA • ' Re r. Theresa A. Roth STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of AS1 IN 00, ) Dated this day of , 1995 Personally appeared the within named J.T. ROTH, Jr. and acknowledges the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. IPA) � Before : � �,;�'f Notary Public for Orego 011.„ OFFICIAL SEAL UNDA L MC GETTIGAN My commission expires: \ - NOTARY PUBLIC=0Re00N COMMISSION NO.061109 MY COMMISSION E)PIRES FEB.28,2001 STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. County of ► + C 0, ) Dated this 9() day of 402-1 L , 1995 Personally appeared the within named THERESA A. ROTH and acknowled -s e foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Before: I/ p, / Notary Public for Orego ��" ( My commission expires: a I I �� OFFICIAL SEAL ` UNDA L MC GETTIGAN NOTARY PUBLIC•OREOON COMMISSION No.061109 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.28.2001 Easement for Driveway Page 3 ed/.1k3/1 TJ9 11:: 6 5036539095 COMPASS ENGIIIEEPIIIG PAGE 03 e 0 5. W. FRAHKLJN ST Ra.B. 25 25 2.5 25 ;"`,, t 25 25 25 /iI 1 � . . l..Ll 4 , ,, > a1 2 3 4467 S Lii <ic — ..,. /I > , / i < A.' ' : ;10, , •. , 0 - - ,.//. 4,,,,,,A 36 \.9 .tliiz - 9 //' /1 _.(' I /../ , .'xi , ,,,, toa' r e,,,,y,/f, , ,..,,,,, . , =. 7,.., , 0 arrAl ° Itg /f / ///.7 .77.1/7 / . i ' ////á//3'11 /f too' N 12 33 . cV 2.4.9 . . . in c i N I 30 ..... __.. ......... .414,,n Whim. I M.4..0 Oki Please... \.. ( ROUTING& REQUEST ) QUEST 111 Read To: 0 H -Iclle laKpprove lb And. . D_For, - • . .-- I! Return -iv E . - -• or Recycle ,--, 0 Review with Me From. 14," ( Pourt469 7444031111191 ) Date: 9 4410 t 5 nr,A xuw tctl,UKULD UUCU' T"I O: 'Al" t ur urituv�� } SS • CITY HALL RECORDS DEP, .LENT, ,inty of Washington ' / • -CIT'c OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. I, Jerry R.Hanson, Director of Assess- 13125 ,OR 97223 ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County 1--) Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received INDIVIDUAL, and recorded in book of records of said county. f�,rEetr�• File No. PP— cif,`CIO 2-'41- Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation,Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 99073959 Rect: 233900 21.00 06/18/1999 09: 46: 49am DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES J.T. Roth, Jr. and Theresa Roth, husband and wife does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road, and utility purposes on, over, across, under, along, and within the following described real propety in Washington County, Oregon: Attached Exhibit "A" & B1 To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this day of /'lia,� 19 99 1 , Sii/tore Signature 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, (1200, Tigard, OR 97223 Tax Statement Mailing Address Mailing Address STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 1174.441 /49q (date)by: J,T, Roth, Jr. , Theresa Roth (name ofperson(s)). /Th ben% OFFICIAL SEAL i � es : J RANDALL RUTHERFORD � Q 7 ? - , .-.c _1 C NOTARY PUBUC—OREGON Not 's Signature � '+® COMMISSION NO.307283 ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV 30,2001 My C nm■_s+'an Expires: /7 " 30 ` 6/ Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this i l day of, MAV 196161 . , ((4J.) P. City Engineer • —3 I:‘131I01UB-PORM\ROWD&M DOT Ident Nos..23. Tract 1 A tract of land located in Block 29 in the plat of West Portland Heights, recorded March 22, 1890 in Book 1 at Pages 55 and 56 in Washington County, Oregon, in the Northeast One- quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Block 29, West Portland Heights; thence East, 14 feet along the North Line of said Block; thence southwesterly to a point on the West line of said Block, 14 feet South of the Northwest Corner of said Block; thence North, 14 feet along the West line of said Block to the point of beginning, containing an area of 98 square feet, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" MAP 7-0 ACCOMPANY DESCR/PT/ON. A Tact at ed Located in mat 29 of West P01 Heights Loaned in the NE 114 or Section 4 Thy nr12 Sonth, Asap! Ward Willamette afar# Ws:Malton Corm Oregon I SW Franklin Street 14' 86' EAST 1 V9.11' Ante: 98 sq. ft. az 1 2 .3 4 5 60.00 25' , 25' 25' 25' _ J - - 1 _ _L—_ 100' 9 I I - 14 v i ;29 - NOTE: Bearings and distances per plat of West Port/and Heights, Book 1, Pages 55, 56 60.00'--- Scale: 1'-60' PrrEHAparrd S at r4SSOcIATB.s INC SU/TF .500 - A.G.C. CENTER 9450 S W COMMERCE CIRCLE EXHIBIT B1 wiLSOMILL& OREGON 970X) 95189. 118 PHoNE (503) 682-2450 (Tract 1) REC 'VED Eo JUN 1 7 1999 P.O. Box 1928 EMPL E R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0018 O'JE fl Q V 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 TEMPORARY SERVICES SINCE 1947® Phone: (503) 635-2900 Fax: (503) 635-9447 June 16,1999 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Variance Type II Application Per the instructions of the Mayor and City Council at the June 8,1999 council meeting, we are submitting the enclosed variance application request for your review. The subject property is in a transitional block in the Tigard Triangle where sidewalks are in existence and adjacent to the curb. We believe the variance will allow for a more consistent and congruous appearance to the adjacent property, be less expensive to install and maintain, and be more ADA compliant and user friendly for curb side parking. We've also enclosed copies of six pictures of the site and surrounding property and a rough drawing that we had provided to the Mayor and the members of the City Council. We where also advised at the same City Council meeting that the Filing Fee may be waived by the Council. Sincerely, ribc,91 • 11°F Peter J. Szaman Property Owner "HELPING PEOPLE SUCCEED" Web Site: http://www.eostaffing.com • E-Mail:tempinfo @eostaffing.com VARIANCE 4A TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 12540 SW 69th Ave. Tigard, Or. 97223 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S101AA - 08300 Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Site Size: 15,000 s.f. Receipt No.: Property Owner/Deed Holders)*: Pete Szambelan Application Accepted By: Date: Address: 4550 SW Kruse Way suite 3ffEhone: 635-2900 City: Lake Oswego, Or. Zip: 97035 Applicant*: camp Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: Phone: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession CIT Area: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the Rev. 11/26/98 is\curpinlmasters\variance.doc back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Variance to the following provision(s) of the Community Development Application Elements Submitted: Code (please be specific): Chapter 18.67, defi ni nq the ❑ Application Form construction of a "Local Street"is not specific however -- •. • - - . -- - - :.c k ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization off the curb and against the property line. We would ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed request a variance to construct sidewalks directly hehind the street curb to stay consistant with the ❑ Site/Plot Plan existing sidewalks to the east and to provide an _,,/(#of copies based on pre app check list) easier point of pedestrian access tor the allowed I� Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") •I. •' - •• • • ' • • ' e LJ Applicant's Statement landscape in the right-of-way to merge with that in the (#of copies based on pre-app check list) private development area providing consistency of maintenance and irrigation. ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes if Filing Fee (Administrative) $545.00 Oa Mayor 0.4 C i �� -►u cud ec� tka F,� �e It Aa-Y b e 1 L for � (1-e- , List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NONE APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. 11th June 99 DATED this day of , 19 ,4 r'Owner's Sig to d wner's Si•nat re Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 • FROM :FIRST PMERICPN TITLE 19' 16-15 11:01 ##015 P.02/02 0 Alllk4/0 • -• 101.116,� RAM oP ORION ) M g,w of t,1a r,,,h"!,.. ;4, ,, j,.,4., 4,,, 2,1m • t„ After lbeaad�eena�m. stsod !. . .xi. 1 • .ard 1 J 11,E�i'� A�., �.%-;,. ,.. Midi'a chirp toreq t1C9trd alt taR aQIx.3i1 ? i r FY i��r • .' - CU- I Bfl AAA�soot to the rollwvhy Flamm F , ,11 Doc i 440 68151 DV,,B� mot: 23150 211.00 �.al:s Dsweoa,aRu„ -, oa/a2/1999 03:4b 26pn Entow Pie. 4➢� We loo,MU �o jJSTATUTORY WARRANTY DEED lid-T-Ft1Qj, , D!TIER A 12t7T71.[�tsn2or,mama and%Ingots tD 0 iniziatigalarAlgalldokameratilyikartlitm, ouzo. dtc lbdlu dus deaottbo4 trod propeny tree of Wove ma oocnm6raposa,rowel u opecl4Cily set Pootb bcMA: ' Lora I,8,3,4,9 and 1E,Bleak 29,WEST PORTIA/0 NI3=OFMT9,la the Cif/of Tigard,coma of Waahtn�to State of Coogan; i7rle Property la free of 11ene and euounbra cee,EXCEPT: 8aentaanr Quveaaete,CoodttIona tmd Reclaim of rreord,if emry. THIS INS'l'RU9AENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF TITS PROPERTY DESCSURED 114 TEIE -._ - ._ IMMINENT IN V!O1.ATICN OF APPLICABLE I.AND USE LAWS ANA REGULATIONS, DE1 OAP SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSWW3MPNT,THE PER.9DNACQUIRING FEE Tr LE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHIC WITH T'1'P3 APPROPRIATE CITY OR a:IUNTY Y1 ANNU40(APARTMENT TO VEINY APPROVED UBE9 AND TD DETERMINS ANY UMirs ON L4WsUPrs Af3ALNOrr FARMi*Q OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DIMMED IN OM 30820, The ma oonederatioa for this ool+voyeoco ii S1EOA 1O,>$i ccb Envy•w ri maiamminfoll 0.0301 nomad 11th .l11 f day of Mil _. MCI(' Z • ! i 7 'r ROTH, ' TfEIRE& ROTx ' SLATE OF OREOQN • - • Coonfy of WASBINCilON }21 nit Instrument wu altonwtodged ft , 1,' of FLY, • • by J.T.BOTH,IA, THERESA ROTH I �I • ,1 1i(.iw...., My na¢mads ioo eapizttt: a. 0l LJNDA L 110 D41718AN K J MQn10oa .m:11., 0.;` tutJNO1 4 COUMrr trro> t ^tDV# Fmwwntt nra . lot 'Arta_ glaig I , ' s; STAI CATCH BASIN /TA1o+42I5RTSWFRANKLIN ST.LDATA I::- __._-._ - EXISTING 1=24.98 _ � -•� D=8937'10" /./•-•/,'a I �,, a CUR 3 '.'1,4-0 : 1,;;x,14. , �_ �.__ l 11, 1 6'aOD. i� I t7 a 25'RADIUS �� i/ J7, ., .min. 1-ANr �./r 1 I / 1 2.1"RR �I i N I/ I0"DEGO. sr 17R y. �/ 6'DM. Id OEM S" IV I i I 6'Of CIO , �4 /••E•I I NEW BUILDING - /�:\y ;. �� 4, : FINISH FLOOR ELEV - 120.05 ��// 2 `�� i 8•FIR%I�. PLAN srm, ' I 1.";;;." \ U } }' I AND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION SCALE: f" - 20' , / LOW POrNT DRAIN Ili Li i I f I ADA GNACE I co 1 SAN 1 tills'a k \\ 1 r I 7A'Q7tT+ �ZRT i2"Y —'�M A { � � II nL21 • 1.':fl T0'ij� I19.I0 i 119.66 120.30 M II °•�.. r .• r i, •. •.. C r'0. ■ CONSTRUCTION y`<c° U 0 Q4^ in, M CONSTRUCTI .C C I. ENTRANCE D I b/t I — � Vim;.. 119.00 ��STApNG AREA • ij\ B•FIR • •116F5 EXSI%/LCpV I//T ). . ~12Q m 1�"- A V L T r5I PROPOSED Ca+ralms\ t v cr upOpU 25'RADIUS N A 5iCATCH BASIN I�� #r ~ \ ? N W U aEAN PIT RUN OR 2.-M1NU5 GRAVEL v 3 t • !PROPOSED OTELEVAOONS t RIM: ►ra.so 0�• SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT Si I Ct GEOTEXTILE,AS REQUIRED s"+•— I 119dfj t ; /i b ,��a ' /I Vii'I�' 1 (�` i (,` � y Is� I Cf \1!/ R I GRAVEL C01 10;OAK ENTRANCE f-30' i \�� 1 115.0 1 -_ �.11 — rl'•'' IdII tf • __________,_ a d•Figilli _ �T SCALE: N75 •. ... OAK 100' EXISTING EXTRUDED CURB I - . . SEDIMENT FENCE 00 "�� 0"OAK 8-1- -vACANT- 0 NOTE; STM OUTLET TTHE OTHER ACCESSIBLE SFACE CAN SPACE VAII- ACCIESSIBLE. OR THECSTANDA D- -------- STA. 7+80.76, 15 RT PARKING SPACE. VAN - ACCESSIBLE SPACE SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL SIGN (0R20-6D) 'I. f MOUNTED BELOW THE STANDARD SPACE PARKING SIGN (0R20-6B) ' ! { PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH A SIGN AT LEAST HE INTERNATIONAL 1ONALOSYMBOLDOF ACCESS AND HAVES WITH THE FOLLOWING i � WORDS IN AT LEAST ONE INCH HIGH LETTERS Q.) .■ ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CURB RAMP W( IN e i /____-...\ DETECTABLE WARNING y t ■ OR20-.B I:i: };::� OR20-till q EXISTING DITCH INLET /� o ^' I 3[7 1 STA. 10 43 06, 15.63'R1 r= ♦" PAINTED S „.,/-301” t, �T RIM: 108.50 ;1 SrRIPES 1 IF-OUT 105.20 _ lur � °'roll on1' `fa � Y, r 4 '''lid 4 G' c. ,fir 's a,: `: ": }. 1 11111111110111.15=.2=6174 4 Ys�` •1 �; vg �hS �.�+' r.! i�„ Ja Y a r' a t!<: h. 1�.+ 4 Ilk X71 " ;"a�1 .I+.r, '} • stn,. r •'l, � h.' }. it hx e lk fir V a � �4 � e , pn ^ k nv � r Yi o � 1eir 44 Vi ”� i- d 1. e ri,. M1 Iii ,4' Il ,r I^I if 1� . . ∎va f i'41!v k ' v � 04�e c ', ( u , ,ew ,c,i E � -, vi',', ut et t ei yl {i iq h r q 4� n.eat p r YYWry' S p i h r nt G � ' ) l r� r i' II '''''''' "'„:—:::.,,,:ri, ,,4 ,' ,Y.,,,1 ,,, 17„...,,i .J, „. , , , .. ., . . . ,,,. ...,., *.,.„, , • ,..., 4.... _ __ i r J A' Go �? I To g. IF.�P. ri - Y �f M Y r M t# , ' ... r sr. w 11 J ., Its �... `• . a v .0:, fry ';_I I I .- / �S y V 0 ilit Nr "►+s*' -lima . :44d. c ark, It 1s is „� . �... °+ ems`•Al kr 4. ...�>i--�?ii.:T . it ii.1y.. 4 Tivi '."'j . f tit V ! . 1 r 'fti'i. ''I ',@ 1 y.•� , I.� }, I,ti ,f w,fr+ r1'-.', • • r,?!A ;N{ , �r r '•,` �' • ` ` • +A r,� 1�r j ! ,,.41,4';.: I�I' f.�if 5;'; �. I �,� ,0,; .' 4. ids•iy ! ' . .. 1 a I+f •i! I f ' .._- �. _ ._.. ...____ L.: , ______ _ , , , ActitAwk--------- -- -.- - --,5ervp ---- . , ��' ,.r- ---_. .. --... -i ...._..T "4 - -- j Y i l l rkQr , vt rte;-- `.. It ., r.....,.....11FrIzik b2,...t , r I, gectit , -1-- . 1 ( LI ____t____ isj _____ ,jk.,,ttfz_____ .„....._ . ofeczli -- 1E j- 2:1:1.,AztZ j., si de_w r - ..-rAi,■27.. _Cr___6=_Y:th,V2aL_ • A1 ,r1110114' -1 ' - A g 5 . 6 T21_-_4_41re l . , . . ti i ;I . -� -'-- 6/Z RIM 47 V10 - CSa_kA9 G1.l,J L�o CAS E — `�'^ 4 - Lt LootcL LJoo d o L.9 V19 \ c - o In.Q va G s w1cVe.w�c vn.e.- iA ; r€rA,v c' , Cam.¢ oo +0 csk v Q , b-J -Q to o ''L'.o eA.L4 �, JUN-18-1999 10 48 503 626 8903 P.01/03 SPECHT Date: 6/18/99 To: Mayor Jim Nicoll Fax: 503-684-3636 Councilor Paul Hunt Fax: 503-620-8759 Councilor Brian Moore Fax: 503-603-0461 Councilor Joyce Patton Fax: 503-590-0371 Councilor Ken Scheekia Fax: 503-639-5697 CC: City of Tigard Fax: 503-684-7297 kW Monahan t/fim Hendryx Gus Duenas Vannie Nguyen DeHaas & Assoc., Inc. Fax: 503-682-4018 Marlin DeHaas Landmark Ford Fax: 503-598-8368 Jim Corliss VLMK Engineers Fax: 503-248-9263 Jim Knauf From: Todd R. Sheaffer Phone: 503-646-2202 Vice President Fax: 503-626-8903 Pages: 2 (including cover) Subject: 691h Avenue LID Enclosed please find a copy of letter from Greg Specht. Specht Properties,Inc./Specht Development,Inc. • 15400 SW Millikan Way • Beaverton,Oregon 97006 C;11.M6 Projaas\1998 Proiecb-Todd\Tigard triengle\COT41.doa ' JUN-18-1999 10:49 503 626 8903 P.02/03 4, SP1EIJHE]I' SPECHT PROPERTIES SI'ECHT DEVrLC)PM,N I• 15400 S.W. Milltkaa Way•Beaverton,OR 97006 503/646-2202 Fax 503/626-8903 June 18, 1999 City Council Members Via: Facsimile 684-7297 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 RE: 69th Avenue LID Dear City Council Members: At the last City Council meeting, a solution was proposed to address Mr. Corliss' request to locate the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. That solution was to allow for only a portion of the sidewalk located along Mr. Corliss' property to be constructed adjacent to the curb,with the balance of the 69th Avenue LID (the"LID")sidewalk to be constructed according to the current approved plans. which includes the planter strip being located between the sidewalk and the curb. While we respect Mr. Corliss' long and successful presence in the Tigard Triangle,this solution is unacceptable to us from both a planning and visual perspective. The visual symmetry of 69th Avenue will be broken should one side of the Right-of-Way (the "ROW") have the sidewalk adjacent to the curb along with the new street trees located along the edge of the ROW, while the other side of the ROW will have a planter strip with trees adjacent to the curb, with the sidewalk along the outer edge of the ROW. Given the linear nature of 69th Avenue, such an asymmetrical design would detract from the visual image of the streets included within the LID. This LID has been many months in the making, and all property owners had ample time to provide City Staff with their input on such design matters. Therefore,we believe it is not appropriate to reopen this matter at this time. However, should the City Council choose to grant Mr. Corliss' request for sidewalks adjacent to the curb along his LID frontage,we request that the City Council direct City Staff and DeHaas and Associates, Inc. to change the LID plans to show all sidewalks adjacent to the curb, including the sidewalks on the West side of 69th Avenue. This will result in symetrical, visually attractive improvements to be constructed within the LID. In fact, Speck Development, Inc., as the driving force behind this LID, previously made a similar "curb tight" request to both City Staff and DeHaas and Associates, Inc. and were denied in our request. If the City Council now believes it has discretion to grant Mr. Corliss a waiver regarding the location of the sidewalk and planter strip adjacent to his property, City Council should also have the authority to grant our request for curb tight sidewalks. S'1F 1 C$SH RSC OT4O.d o e JUN-18-1999 10:49 503 626 8903 P.03,03 Once again, please let me restate that while it is not our intent to interfere with the concerns of other property owners, as the largest property owner within the LID, must object to any change to the approved LID if it results in an increase in the cost or any extension of the completion date. However, if the request can be granted without any cost or schedule impact, it should be granted for all property owners,not just Mr.Corliss. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Please contact me should you have any questions. Best Regards, SPECHT DEVELOPMENT, INC. regory . Specht siden c: Jim Corliss,Landmark Ford(fax: 598-8368) Todd Sheaffer • S:IRILESHic.E1COTra, 1 TOTAL P.03 C.DR.91-D4 June 29, 1999 1(Alk CITY OF TIGARD Peter J. Szambelan OREGON PO Box 1928 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0018 Dear Mr. Szambelan: We are in receipt of your request for a Variance to sidewalk location in the Tigard Triangle. The application is incomplete. The criteria for granting a Variance in Code Section 18.370 must be addressed. If you choose to proceed with a Variance, you may want to discuss what is necessary to complete the application with Associate Planner Mark Roberts at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315. The fee waiver request must be made to the City Council. An application is not complete without the required fee. It should be noted that there is no guarantee the Variance can be granted. An analysis of a complete application is necessary. I have discussed the proposed Local Improvement District (L.I.D.) improvements with City Engineer Gus Duenas. Based on his comments, it is possible that a Variance will not be necessary. In the Corliss request, the City Council chose to allow a meandering sidewalk with the property tight sidewalk moved away from the curb where physical slope conditions warrant. The majority of the sidewalk will be along the property line. This helps to stay with the integrity of the Triangle Design Standards. The Specht property will put in 12-foot sidewalks with curbside tree grates at building entrances, further following the Triangle Standards. Mr. Duenas says the L.I.D. design for sidewalks adjacent to your property will include a curb tight sidewalk on SW Franklin Street. A property line tight sidewalk will be paced on your frontage on SW 69th Avenue. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Gus Duenas. Sincere) Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager is\curpin\dick\letters\Szambelan TT Sidewalks Variance.doc c: Jim Hendryx, Gus Duenas, Mark Roberts, 1999 Planning correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 February 25, 2000 Peter J. Szambelan 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Dear Mr. Szambelan: It has been brought to my attention that you have received occupancy without the planning department signing off on all land-use conditions. A site visit was conducted on the property located at 12540 SW 69th Avenue on 02/24/00. Listed below are items shown on the approved plans that have not been constructed on-site. Please address and install these items or this matter will be turned over to Code Enforcement for further action: • Wheel stops on all parking stalls. • Landscaping on SW portion of parking lot. • Rock Cotoneaster groundcover as proposed. Please resolve this matter by 03/30/00. If this does not provide a sufficient amount of time, please call me to discuss signing a Voluntary Compliance Agreement for an extension. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of a citation,court date,and possible fine. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171 Extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available,please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner I/curpin/mathew/conditions.doc T Z 226 424 E68 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail See reverse JFt. /ter, / /I / _� /_ � wiffiniWki. , 3iiiffiNgiciasvm4MG Certified Fee , �}— ` Spedel Delivery Fee kli ' � • _ k`2- =n& fii02i111111= 4 TOTAL:�t: �Ct irk,'"' .Ci �M `p .70 U. Li b0 k. R • SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date.1 Delivery item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 0 ae. • Print your name and address on the reverse AA C. -g ature so that we can return the card to ou. /,, - ❑Agent ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, X d�dk; � ❑Addressee or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No b-/er 77 S:54.474611 ,a4 4/532)s rival ('' . 30� 3. ice Type �� Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail V 7,65- ❑ Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise i.e?1 d`5v 0 8iI ❑C.O.D. / 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number(Copy from service label) • i. PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789 February 25, 2000 rAjk Cyr OF TIGARD Peter J. Szambelan OREGON 4550 SW Kruse Way suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Dear Mr. Szambelan: It has been brought to my attention that you have received occupancy without the planning department signing off on all land-use conditions. A site visit was conducted on the property located at 12540 SW 69th Avenue on 02/24/00. Listed below are items shown on the approved plans that have not been constructed on-site. Please address and install these items or this matter will be turned over to Code Enforcement for further action: • Wheel stops on all parking stalls. • Landscaping on SW portion of parking lot. • Rock Cotoneaster groundcover as proposed. Please resolve this matter by 03/30/00. If this does not provide a sufficient amount of time, please call me to discuss signing a Voluntary Compliance Agreement for an extension. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of a citation,court date,and possible fine. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171 Extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available,please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, ---ipp ,- ,.....- 10,-,740111111pr,le. '' -- aliiiiihigg' --.-- M.' ar.fx'c eidegger Assistant Planner I/curp Wmathew/conditions.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 CG °�y�`JG�� olOC RECEIVED PLANNING MA* I - 2000 March 07,2000 r OF TIGARD To: Mathew Scheidegger From: Richard Myrick City of Tigard J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 12600 S.W. 72nd suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 Re: Property located at 12540 SW 69th Avenue, Tigard, OR; Mr. Scheidegger, Your letter to Mr. Peter Szambelan dated 01/24/00 lists several omissions and/or changes from the originally approved plans. Please find enclosed, a copy of Mr. Szambelan's letter and his reaction to the issues in question. The following is our response to the issues you listed. The Owner did want wheel stops due to the trip hazard they present, and since it is our understanding they are not required in this application, we complied with his request. The landscaped area at the SW corner of the property was changed from the originally submitted plan to allow for wider parking stalls but still covers approx. 15%of the lot. It is our understanding that only 11% of the total lot be landscaped. Finally, the Owner does not like the Cotoneaster ground cover, as shown on the plan, and requested that we omit it. We have worked closely with the City of Tigard throughout the course of construction in so much that the site was inspected and approved for occupancy on 01/24/00. Again, the omissions and minor changes you refer to were at the request of the Owner. If we are not in violation of any City codes or ordinances, what is the real issue here? Sincerely, L "--fr7- (( Richard Myrick 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave., Suite 200, Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — 1 MAR-03-2000 11 20 P.01/01 EC, E�P VE R S F.O. B 1928 Lake Oswego, dR 97Qox 0018 E 3x OV B�� 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 0. Phone: (503) 635.2900 TEMPORARY SERVICES SINCE '1947 Fax: (503) 635-9447 March 2,2000 Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction,Inc. 12600 S.W. 72"d, Suite 200 Tigard,OR 97223 Dear Mr. Roth, In regards to the letter from the City of Tigard dated 02125100, the following is what we had agreed upon. 1) The wheel stops on all parking stalls, in my opinion are a trip hazard. It is also my understanding that the stops are not a requirement. 2) The area at the S.W. corner of the parking lot was changed(see attached site plan). I wanted to increase the size of the parking stalls to prevent damage to employee/patrons car doors. We did not add stalls;we simply made the stalls wider. 3) I did not want the Rock Cotoneastcr ground cover as proposed. It was my understanding that these changes were reasonable and acceptable. Please address with the City of Tigard. Sincerely, Pefer Peter J. Szambelan "HELPING PEOPLE SUCCEED" Web Site http://www.eostaftlnq.com • E-Mail: temoinfoeaostattina.com TOTAL P.01 • City of Tigard Washington County Oregon oivid` Voluntary Compliance Agreement J� CITY OF TIGARD To: Peter J. Szambelan OREGON 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Employers Overload Building I Peter Szambelan, as responsible person for Tax Map 2S 101 AA, Tax Lot 08300, agree to the following conditions: The following items will be installed to City standards by the time frame mentioned below: • Wheel stops on all parking stalls at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. • Install Rock Cotoneaster groundcover as per the approved plans. I understand the City will withhold action until April 12, 2000. Upon compliance with all above conditions, this case will be closed. I further understand if these conditions are not complied with fully, I may be cited with a Summons and Complaint. Signed: Date: Signed: Date: Note: Please sign and return one copy of this agreement by (5 days from date of receipt), otherwise this document is terminated and a Summons and Complaint will be issued. c/windows/temp/cond itions2.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 4 l March 15, 2000 _ Richard Cock CITY OF TIGARD J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 OREGON RE: Employers Overload Dear Mr. Myrick: This letter is in response to your client's request that the wheel stops, ground cover and landscaped area in the SW corner of the property not be installed. After review of the approved plan and a site visit, staff has concluded the following: . The landscaped area in the SW corner of the lot does not need to be installed due to the altered parking lot; . The Rock Cotoneaster groundcover must be installed as required by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (L-1 Low Screen); and . The wheel stops on all parking stalls must be installed as per the approved plan. If the applicant did not want the wheel stops, the walkway at the front of the building should have been designed to meet the minimum 6 feet with an additional three feet to compensate for the wheel stops. According to the Tigard Development Code, "parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements." This matter was discussed and agreed to by David Jenson on March 8, 2000. A compliance date was set for April 12, 2000. Because of the time that has passed, a new compliance date will be set at April 30, 2000. The City feels this is ample time to bring the Employers Overload building into compliance. If the issues mentioned above are not complete by April 30, 2000, a summons and complaint will be issued. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, do 2-- 7._ Mal e Sch-'degge Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\employee overload.doc c: Peter J. Szambelan 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 SDR 98-00024 Land use file Sent via certified mail - receipt no. Z 226 424 271 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Received by(Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Dellii y item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 3/' b W • r your name and address on the reverse s (at we can return the card to you. Signature • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, t / ❑Agent or on the front if space permits. / !] 1�Addressee D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No 6ieAr r/G9� _ �:i, _M I stru 1'/1J',11 ,' 7 'o �I/F 7� ,�/' f �f yt�3. Service Type v) �](i(i �C/ (j�p�(J Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail /j-1`I 4e g-7 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ��``!!//�� ❑ Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. y4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2.ficX14 (Cad/6rvl PS Form 3811,July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99-M-1789 Z 226 424 271 US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail ...-Th No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do • use for Intematio ..1 .'I See reverse o . fEatiriffi I 1-.. 1, r , iiiiiiil Iti a I 1 I 6415*.V 1 I I I s, =11111121171M1 t Spedal Del' q,, ter. \ Restricted':. Lb ‘1 Return Receipt to . Whom&Date Delivered vered e. c� Return Receipt Showing to Whom, �O a Date,&Addressee's Address ,, �S TOTAL Postage&Fees Mr. Postmark or Date Cr) o , 0 ay1(� March 15, 2000 Tim Roth J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. 12600 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 200 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Employers Overload Dear Mr. Roth: This letter is in response to your letter dated March 27, 2000. You have requested clarification on the low lying landscaping that is required between the parking area of the Employer Overload building and SW 69th This matter was discussed and agreed to by David Jenson on March 8, 2000. A compliance date was set for April 12, 2000. Because of the time that has passed, a new compliance date will be set at April 30, 2000. The City feels this is ample time to bring the Employers Overload building into compliance. If the issues mentioned above are not complete by April 30, 2000, a summons and complaint will be issued. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\employee overload doc c: Peter J. Szambelan 4550 SW Kruse Way, Suite 300 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 SDR 98-00024 Land use file O<s (`y o�r�Iarch 27, 2000 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Mr. Mathew Scheidegger RE: Employer Overload, 12540 SW 69th Ave. SDR 98-0024 Site Work Permit SIT99-00015 Dear Mr. Scheidegger I need to respond to your March 15, 2000 letter to request further clarification on the two issues you are asking to be resolved. The first issue relates to the installation of"Rock Cotoneaster groundcover" as you state is a requirement by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards(L-1 Low Screen). My first question for clarification is your statement that the absence of ground cover is in violation of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The Tigard Triangle Design Standards, section 18.67.070,F. "Landscaping and Screening"#1. "L-1 Low Screening"reads: For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets,planting standards of Chapter 18.100 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The area in question fits this description,the L-1 standard applies to a major or minor arterial which does not apply to SW 69th or SW Franklin. I referenced the chapter 18.100 and could not find anything specific to ground cover? My second question for clarification is that the City of Tigard has contracted to have SW 69th improved through a L.I.D. The work has been completed and no ground cover was installed in the common areas of the street right-of-ways and the engineer assigned to over see the work has stated that no ground cover was authorized by the City. So my question is;If the City of Tigard does not require ground cover for the work they authorize why would they require the same for the property owners or the developers?It's property located in the same area and governed by the same development codes? The property owner has requested that ground cover is not installed and we would like to honor his request. This certainly does not suggest that his property will not be maintained or that the appearance will be any less than the surrounding properties including that property located in the City right-of-way. — 12600 S.W. 72nd Ave.,Suite 200,Tigard, Oregon 97223 503/639-2639 FAX 503/624-0239 CCB#0031700 — I"- 4 r" 3 •6-4 ;.csj 100`'`C.^ J.T. Roth Construction Inc. The second issues relates to the installation of wheel stops. You again reference the "Tigard Development Code" and state that the absence of wheel stops would require a ten (10) foot walkway. Again, my question of clarification is that chapter 18.67 MUE zoning talks to the requirement of a six(6) foot entry walkway(18.67.070; B, #4)but no where in this chapter does it speak specific to the front three feet of the parking stall as you defined in your letter,nor does it make reference to other chapters or sections of the code to further clarify or define. This certainly suggests that there is no such requirement in the MUE zoning. A second question of clarification raises the issue of the three(3)development projects located on the west side of SW 69th being developed by Specht Development and that if the City Development Code can support the installation of wheel stops I would anticipate that those buildings would be subject to the same requirements. I've noticed that those buildings are being completed but have not seen wheel stops installed in their parking lots? The property owner of the Employer Overload building has specifically requested that wheel stops are not installed in his parking lot,he see's them as a liability. Please provide me a response to my questions of clarification so that I may respond to the property owner with correct answers consistent with the requirements of the Tigard Development Code and consistent with the approvals given adjacent development projects. 7 J. . `oth,'Jr. J.T. Roth Construction, Inc. Cc: Mr. Pete Szambelan