Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1999-00003
SDR99 - 00003 SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 99-0003 CITY O TIIGARD Community Development SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/20/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 99-0003 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Site Development Review for the construction of a one (1)-story, 5,197 square foot retail building on a 14,375 square foot lot. APPLICANT: Michael Candianides OWNER: Jack Mayeaux 7235 SW Bonita Road 12525 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district allows for civic, retail and office uses centered in the City's historic downtown. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. APPLICABLE Community Development Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); REVIEW 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.520 (Central Business District CRITERIA: Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.780 (Signs); 18.790 (Tree Removal); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE , AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS. (Unless otherwise specified, the Staff contact is Brian Rager with the Engineering Department at 503-639-4171.) 1 . Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the public storm drainage work and sanitary sewer connection in SW Scoffins Street. The applicant will need to submit 5 copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District; B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency; C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property; or D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 4. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation (ODOT), Highway Division, along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline (or as ODOT otherwise directs). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 503-731-8461). 6. The proposed access locations on SW Scoffins Street are not approved. No access is to be permitted on this street. The proposed trash collection and loading areas should be relocated elsewhere on the site where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 8. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages and at completion of the construction. Prior to the final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact for the following conditions will be Doris Michael, Planning Division 503-639-4171 x317. 10. Provide a revised parking plan that shows the pedestrian accessway connecting the main walkway in front of the retail building to the public sidewalk being a minimum of 4 feet wide. 11 . The applicant shall submit a revised plan that shows the location of the service facilities such as the gas meter and air conditioner, and demonstrate compliance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. 12. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing a minimum 3-foot space for the street trees (minus the parking overhang area). The proposed Goldenrain tree at the corner of SW Hall and SW Scoffins Street shall be replaced with a smaller tree and moved to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded. The plan shall note that the Flame Maple trees shall be pruned to be a tree. 13. The site plan shall indicate the type and size of the fence that shall be located and maintained along the west property line. 14. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and detailed trash enclosure design to the Franchise Hauler for review and approval. The plans shall be of sufficient detail for the Franchise Hauler to determine that the applicable design and access standards are met. The site plan shall show a new location for the trash enclosure (not off SW Scoffins) and that the storage container gate will be made of solid wood, not chain link with slats as proposed. 15. The applicant shall submit a revised vehicle-parking plan showing that the proposed parking space dimension (length) complies with the City standard. 16. A detailed bicycle parking design shall be provided demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 18.765.050.C. and that the proposed bicycle parking design would accommodate 6 spaces for a 5,197 square foot building (or 7 spaces for a 6,139 square foot building). SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 17. The applicant shall address the parking needs for the 942 square foot storage area by one the following ways: (a) Submit a revised parking plan adding 3 parking spaces; (b) • Revise the building plans to eliminate the 942 square foot storage area; or (c) Obtain a parking reduction to reduce the off-street parking requirement. 18. Submit a revised site plan retaining the 2 trees over 26 inches in caliper noted on the proposed plan. Submit an arborist report explaining what tree protection measures should be taken to ensure that they are not damaged during construction. Submit a revised landscape plan indicating the size of all of the trees that will be retained so Staff can determine if a tree protection plan and deed restriction are needed. If for some reason the 2 trees mentioned above must be removed, the applicant shall submit a tree mitigation plan. The plan shall show how the 56 inches will be provided on-site, off-site, or payment with a fee in-lieu. The proposed mitigation plan must be approved prior to issuance of the building permit; however, actual mitigation is not required to be complete until the occupancy stage. 19. Submit an arborist report indicating what measures will be taken to ensure that the oak tree located south of the subject parcel will not be impacted by project design. 20. A lighting plan shall be provided for review and approval by the Tigard Police Department. Staff Contact: Jim Wolfe, Police Department (503-639-4171 x220). 21. Submit a revised site plan relocating the driveway along the south property line as requested by ODOT. 22. The applicant shall take Tri-Met's recommendation into consideration to place the building along SW Hall when revising the project to comply with the various requirements. 23. Submit a revised site plan showing the location of wheel stops or that the pavement will be 4 inches tall to prevent vehicles from overhanging more than 3 feet into the landscape islands. 24. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall address the Building Division comments about the catchbasin design and the need for 2 hydrants. Staff Contact: Robert Poskin (503-639-4171 x392). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: 25. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 26. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Scoffins Street or SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. This fee also only applies to the frontage from where service is obtained for this site. If the fee option is chosen, the amounts for the 2 frontages will be as follows: SW Scoffins Street $3,988 SW Hall Boulevard $3,850 The applicant must clearly show on their plans which street frontage will provide the electrical, phone and cable services so the proper fee can be assessed. The fee shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The current property owner and his father obtained various sign, mechanical and plumbing building permits on the site since 1989. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, at the southwest corner of SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered as follows: (a) north by SW Scoffins Street; (b) east by SW Hall Boulevard; (c) south by an engineering office; and 4) west by residential uses. Single-family residential uses are located to the west of the site and multi-family uses are to the north. Carlson Testing, Inc., Cascade Motorcycle Shop and Snyder Roofing are located to the east of the subject site. Southwest Hall Boulevard is improved with a sidewalk, curb and gutter. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is .33 acres or approximately 14,375 square feet in size. It contains a residence and an upholstery shop. Both buildings are approximately 600 square feet in size. Trees (including a 26-inch-wide fir and a 30-inch-wide pine), shrubs and a gravel paving area are located on the site. The applicant proposes a one-story 5,197 square foot retail building along the westerly half of the site. 942 square feet of storage is proposed to be located in a second story. The building is located approximately 15 feet from the west property line and 10 feet from the south property line. The building will be located about 5 feet from the north property line and 50 feet from the east property line. A 15-space parking lot, including one (1) handicapped stall, is located to the east and south of the proposed building. Two additional driveways are proposed along the north side of the site along SW Scoffins Street. One (1) driveway provides access to the trash collection area with the second one providing access to an enclosed car bay. A 2-space bicycle parking rack is proposed south of the building, west of the handicapped stall. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: Section 18.360.030.A provides that Site Development Review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. In compliance with Section 18.390.040, a pre-application conference was held in 1998. An application for Site Development Review was submitted and subsequently deemed complete on March 24, 1999. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision was given as required by Section 18.390.040.C. The relevant approval criteria are addressed below with respect to the factual information provided by the applicant and are the basis for this Director's decision. Section 18.360.090 states that the Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this Title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage; 8.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Impact Study — Chapter 18.390: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has not submitted an Impact Study. However, the site is currently developed with access to all City services and to an improved street. The applicant is proposing to construct paved parking, landscaping and install street trees in conjunction with the proposed retail building. Completion of the improvements as proposed will satisfy the City's adopted street standards. Commercial Zoning District — Chapter 18.520: Section 18.520.020. states that the Central Business District (CBD) zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered at the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family detached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent to the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. Permitted Uses: Table 18.520.1. lists permitted, restricted, conditional and not-permitted uses in the commercial zoning districts. The applicant is proposing to build a retail building containing 3 separate spaces. A proposed sign shop will occupy the middle retail space. Sign shops are similar to copy shops, which are listed as permitted uses in the CBD zone as a personal service use. The use of the 2 additional spaces is unknown at this time. However, only those uses allowed in the CBD zone will be allowed to locate in the proposed building. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Dimensional Requirements: The CBD Zoning District standards are contained in Table 18.520.2. STANDARD CBD PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None N/A Minimum Lot Width None N/A Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Side facing street on corner & through lots 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Side yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Rear yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- Maximum Height 80 ft. [8] 32.5 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 80% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [7] There are no setback requirements, except 30 feet where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. [8] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. The table above compares the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the CBD zone. The front, side and rear yard setbacks do not apply because the site does not abut residential zoning. FINDING: Based on the above information, the applicant's proposal meets or exceeds the dimensional standards of the CBD zoning district. Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: 18.705.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.705.030.F. states that pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan indicates that a walkway will be provided between the 3 building entrances and the proposed public sidewalk. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) standards; The proposed walkway in front of the commercial building exceeds the 4-foot minimum width requirement by one-foot for a total of 5 feet. The proposed walkway through the parking lot connecting the sidewalk in front of the building to the public sidewalk is approximately 3 feet wide, which is less than the 4-foot minimum width requirement. Walkway design will be evaluated for compliance with ADA standards at the time of site and building permits. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The site plan indicates that walkways will be surfaced in concrete. Safety issues, including lighting and signage, are addressed later in this decision. Section 18.705.030.1.1 states that vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3: TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS - COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES REQUIRED PARKING MINIMUM #OF MINIMUM ACCESS MINIMUM PAVEMENT SPACES DRIVEWAYS REQUIRED WIDTH 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 50' 40' curbs required This project proposes a 15-stall parking lot along the east and south side of the site. A 24-foot-wide paved driveway is proposed to provide access to the proposed parking lot. This application as proposed meets this standard. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; The proposed parking lot is within 8 feet of the proposed 3 easterly entrances. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. No truck traffic requirements are appropriate since the proposed use is a small retail use. Section 18.705.030.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs proposes to provide on-site parking, which satisfies this provision. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, Staff finds that the proposed development satisfies all of the applicable development standards of Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. CONDITION:Provide a revised parking plan that shows the pedestrian accessway connecting the main walkway in front of the retail building to the public sidewalk being a minimum of 4 feet wide. Exceptions to Development Standards — Chapter 18.730: Section 18.730.040.A. provides for additional setback from specified roadways. To ensure improved light, air, and sight distance and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, structures in any zoning district which abut certain arterial and collector streets shall be set back a minimum distance from the centerline of the street. Where the street is not improved, the measurement shall be made at right angles from the centerline or general extension of the street right-of-way as follows: Arterial Streets: The required setback distance for buildings on arterial streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus the following distances measured from the centerline of the street as contained in Table 18.730.1. Collector Streets: The required setback distance for buildings on the following collector streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street as contained in Table 18.730.1. Southwest Hall Boulevard is an Arterial which requires a total building setback of 45 feet from the street centerline. Southwest Scoffins Street is a local street. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Section 18.745.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section 18.760.040.C.), and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The following are the development standards that are applicable to this proposal: Street Trees: Section 18.745.040.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. The subject property has frontage on SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard, which are more than 100 feet in length. The applicant's landscape plan indicates 10 street trees will be planted. Section 18.745.040.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant's landscape plan proposes planting 2 Goldenrain trees and 8 Flame Maple trees along the 2 street frontages. Goldenrain trees are slow or moderate growing to 20 to 35 feet with a 10 to 40-foot spread. Flame Maple trees grow to 20 feet tall with a twenty-foot spread. According to the City Arborist Mark Tuohey, Flame Maple trees need to be properly pruned as they have a tendency to grow as a shrub and not be a good shade tree. One Goldenrain tree and 4 Flame Maple trees are proposed along each street frontage (SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard). The spacing for the Maple trees is 16 feet, which complies with the City's standard. The spacing for the Goldenrain trees is 24 feet, which complies with the standard. The proposed Goldenrain tree at the corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Scoffins Street may need to be replaced and moved slightly to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded as the tree would possibly interfere with the line. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned CBD. The land to the north, west and south are also zoned CBD. The land across SW Hall Boulevard is zoned Industrial Park (I-P) and Light Industrial (I-L). According to the above-referenced matrices, development in CBD zoning district does not require buffering and screening from land in the CBD, I-P or I-L zoning districts. Buffering, however, is required when residential uses abut a CBD use. Three attached single-family dwellings are located to the west of the subject site. Per the matrices, a buffer is required along the west property line. The proposed site plan shows a 15-foot landscaped buffer along the west property line. The matrices show that either a 20-foot, 15-foot or 10-foot buffer may be provided to satisfy the buffer requirement. Per the Code, the minimum spacing for trees per linear foot of buffer is 10 feet, with the maximum spacing being 20 feet. The buffer landscape plan proposes 3 Western Red Alder trees and an existing Cherry tree within an area that is 74 feet long. In order to be able to have a 15-foot buffer, a 6-foot solid wood fence must be provided. The application does not indicate the size or type of fence that is existing or is proposed along the west property line. Therefore, the site plan needs to be revised indicating the size and type of fence or wall that will be provided to reduce the 20-foot buffer requirement. The buffer width could be reduced to 10 feet wide if a wall was proposed. A buffer is not required between abutting uses that are of a different type (i.e. the multi-family uses to the north) when the uses are separated by a street. Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and • The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Landscape screening is proposed along the east and north areas of the proposed 15-stall parking lot. A small portion of the landscape area is smaller than 3 feet because the parking stalls were designed so that a portion of the parking space overhangs the same area. To comply with this standard, the applicant will need to revise the site plan to ensure that the minimum landscape island dimension is provided. Section 18.745.050.E.2 states that any services facilities, such as gas meters or air conditioners which, would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. The site plan only indicates that the parking and storage areas will be screened. The plans do not indicate where any service facilities such as gas meters of air conditioners will be located. Therefore, to ensure that this requirement will be met, the applicant will need to show the location and screening proposed for service facilities and how these facilities will be screened. Section 18.745.050.E.4. states that any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's site plan indicates that a refuse collection area will be provided along the north property line. The site plan indicates that the refuse collection area will be screened by a 6-foot-high sight-obscuring chain link fence. The Code only allows screening by the placement of a solid wood, masonry wall or evergreen shrub. Six Yukon Belle Firethorn Pyracanthas bushes are proposed to be located to the west and south sides of the storage area. The east side of this facility abuts the building. A solid wood gate must be provided in order to comply with the standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening are satisfied outright or will be met through compliance with the condition of approval. CONDITION:Prior to issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows the location of the service facilities such as the gas meter and air conditioner and demonstrates compliance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. CONDITION:Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan and landscape plan for review and approval. The landscape plan shall show a minimum 3-foot landscape island for the street trees (minus the parking overhang area). The tree at the corner of SW Hall and SW Scoffins Street shall be replaced with a smaller tree and moved to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded. The landscape plan shall note that Maple trees will be pruned to be trees. The site plan shall indicate the type and size of the fence that shall be located and maintained along the west property line. The site plan shall show that the storage collection container gate will be made of solid wood, not chain link with slats as proposed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage — Chapter 18.755: Section 18.755.O1O.B. states that the mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Section 18.755.O4O.C.5.b. states that non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet/1,OOO square feet gross floor area (GFA) for "office" and "other" uses. The total square footage of the proposed building is 5,197 square feet. A building this size is required to provide storage of 26.3 square feet (10 + (4 x 5.197) = 30.8). The applicant's site plan indicates that a storage area of approximately 100 square feet will be provided. The Code requires that the gate openings be a minimum of 10 feet wide which is what is proposed. Section 18.755.O5O.B. provides the following location standards: To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; The site plan indicates that proposed mixed-use waste collection area is for both waste and recyclable materials. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building (UBC) and Uniform Fire (UFC) requirements; Compliance with UBC and UFC requirements will be addressed at the time of building permits. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; The site plan indicates that a single outdoor location is proposed. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; The site plan indicates that the proposed storage area is not located within a required front yard. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; The proposed storage area is located along SW Scoffins Street. It is visible from the street, but not in a central or visible location for the users. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C., Design Standards; The proposed storage area is along SW Scoffins Street. Both the parking and screening requirements are addressed elsewhere in this decision. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The storage area is along SW Scoffins Street. It is out of the way of on-site vehicular and pedestrian movement. However, the location is such that it would obstruct vehicle movement on SW Scoffins Street and it will need to be moved. Section 18.755.050.C. provides the following design standards: The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection as follows: • Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; • Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; • Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Section 18.755.050.D. provides the following access standards: • Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; • Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; • Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Compliance with the above design and location standards will be assured through the Franchise Hauler's review and the Building Permit process. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage are met outright or will be satisfied through compliance with the conditions of approval. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a site plan and detailed trash enclosure design drawings to the Franchise Hauler for review and approval. The plans shall be of sufficient detail for the Franchise Hauler to determine that the applicable design and access standards are met. At a minimum, the gate must contain solid wood. Section 18.765.030.8. states that the location of off-street parking will be as follows: • Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); • Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building: The proposed parking lot is within 8 feet of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.765.030.G. states that all parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. State standards require one (1) accessible space for parking lots providing up to 25 parking spaces. The proposed parking lot contains 15 spaces, including one (1) handicapped accessible stall. The standards require that at least one required accessible space be sized and designated "van accessible". This criterion has been already met. Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The proposed parking lot does not address this requirement of a wheel stop. This decision has been conditioned accordingly. Section 18.765.040.N.1. states that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are as follows: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. 3 P.-r Y411 sy The proposed development is proposing 1 off-street parking stalls, which meets the requirement for a 5,197 square foot retail space. However, the plans indicate 942 additional square feet are proposed to be used as storage. As the parking requirements are based on gross floor area, the Code would require that 3 additional parking spaces be added to the site. The proposed compact parking space dimensions (8 feet wide by 15 feet long) does not comply with this standard. The plan shows the compact spaces being only 12 feet long with a 3-foot overhang when the requires a minimum length of 16.5 feet. The proposed standard parking space dimensions (9 feet wide by 18 feet) also does not comply with this standard. The plan shows the spaces being 15 feet long, with a 3-foot maximum allowable overhang when the Code requires a minimum length of 18.5 feet. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The proposed parking 2-direction aisle is shown as being 24 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is met. Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; The site plan indicates that a bicycle parking area will be provided south of the building which is approximately 33 feet from the closest entrance and 93 feet from the furthest entrance. Therefore, this criterion is met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; The site plan indicates that the proposed bicycle parking facility is located on the concrete surface outside the aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Therefore, this criterion is met. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; The site plan indicates that the proposed bicycle parking area is visible from the street and main pedestrian walkway. Therefore, this criterion is met. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle parking area is located outside. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. The applicant's site plan does not indicate that the proposed bicycle parking facility will be covered. Section 18.765.050.C. states that the following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: • The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; • Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; • Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2-1/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; • Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; • Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; • Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. The applicant has not provided sufficient detail on the design of the proposed bicycle parking facility for Staff to make a determination that these standards are met. Section 18.765.050.D.states that outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As noted above, the site plan indicates that the bicycle parking facility will be located on a concrete surface. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.765.050.E. states that the total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2. in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040., using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. The site plan shows 2 bicycle parking spaces being provided. Table 18.765.2 states that personal services retail uses must provide 1.0 bicycle parking space per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The site plan indicates that the retail floor area will be 5,197 square feet. The bicycle-parking requirement is, therefore, 6 spaces (1.0 x 5.197). If the 942 square foot storage area were retained, then an additional bicycle space would be required for a total of 7 spaces. Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Minimum and Maximum off-street parking is addressed earlier in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading are either met outright or will be satisfied through compliance with the conditions of approval. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a revised vehicle and bicycle-parking plan for review and approval. The plan shall show that the proposed parking space length meets the standard. A detailed bicycle parking design shall be provided showing 6 spaces for a 5,197 square foot building (or 7 spaces for a 6,139 square foot building), which demonstrates compliance with the requirements of Section 8.765.050.C. CONDTION: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall address the parking needs for the 942 square foot storage area by one (1) of the following ways: (a) submit a revised parking plan adding 3 parking spaces; (b) revise the building plans to eliminate the 942 square foot storage area; or (c) obtain a parking reduction to reduce the off-street parking requirement. CONDITION:Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site showing a new location for the storage collection facility. Signs — Chapter 18.780: Section 18.780.130.F. states that no signs shall be permitted in an I-P, I-L or I-H zone except for the following: Freestanding signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in industrial zones; The site plan and narrative did not discuss signs. Sign permits are handled separately by the Development Services Technician Staff. Wall Signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in industrial zones: • Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted; • Wall signs may not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached; and SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 • If it is determined under the development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted. No copy will be permitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters. A sign permit will be required at the time of development. Therefore, these standards will be satisfied at the time of sign permit. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.790.030.A. states that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Section 18.790.030.B. states that the tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the; Two trees on the site will be removed — a 30-inch pine and a 26-inch fir. The landscape plan indicates that although 56 inches need to be mitigated, only 39 inches are mitigated on-site. Because all the trees over 12 inches will be removed, the total inches removed must be mitigated inch for inch. According to Section 18.790.030 B. 2. of the Tigard Community Development Code, mitigation trees shall be exclusive of trees required by other development provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots. Based on this Code section, it is unknown how many of the replacement trees are eligible to be used as mitigation. Therefore, a tree removal plan and/or in lieu fees will be necessary to ensure that this Code provision has been satisfied. The City's Arborist noted that this project would possibly impact an oak tree located on the southerly adjacent parcel and recommended that an arborist report be provided addressing how the project design would minimize impacting this oak tree. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: • Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. This Code section was already addressed above. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; The landscape plan indicates 2 trees will be removed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The landscape indicates that several trees will be retained on the site. However, Staff is unsure if a tree protection plan is needed because the sizes are not noted on the landscape plan. If the trees are less than 12 inches in caliper, a tree protection plan is not required. If the two trees are saved as recommended, then a tree protection plan would be needed. Subsequent removal of a tree: Section 18.790.040.B. states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030. or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Staff is unsure if a deed restriction needs to be recorded because the size of the trees that will be retained is unknown. A deed restriction will be necessary for the trees that are to be retained that are larger than 12 inches in caliper. FINDING: Because the applicant has not indicated how they propose to mitigate for the caliper inches removed, Staff can not confirm that the proposal has met the tree removal and mitigation standards. If the applicant indicates how the mitigation inches will be provided on-site, off-site or by payment with a fee in-lieu, Staff can find that the standards have been met. CONDITION: Indicate how the 56 inches will be mitigated. The plan will need to state if the mitigation will provided on-site, off-site or payment with a fee in-lieu. The proposed mitigation plan must be approved prior to issuance of the building permit; however, actual mitigation is not required to be complete until the occupancy stage. CONDITION:Submit a revised landscape plan indicating the size of the trees that will be retained so Staff can determine if a tree protection plan and deed restriction is needed. At a minimum, an arborist will need to provide a tree protection plan for the 26-inch fir and 30-inch pine. CONDITION:Submit an arborist report indicating what measures will be taken to ensure the oak tree on the adjoining site would not be impacted by this project. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 According to Section 18.795.030A, there are no clear vision requirements for property in the CBD zoning district. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards — Chapter 18.810: Section 18.810.030.A.1. states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 8.810.030.A.2. states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. STREETS: The Tigard Development Code Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. The Tigard Development Code Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. SW Hall Boulevard This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map and is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 90 feet. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW, in accordance with ODOT standards, to bring the width up to 45 feet from centerline. Southwest Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curbing and the site has an existing driveway. ODOT has apparently indicated that the applicant's proposed access location will be approved, provided it is relocated southerly to provide more separation from the intersection at Scoffins Street. If ODOT requires additional improvements along SW Hall Boulevard, then the applicant will need to provide those improvements as a part of the project. SW Scoffins Street Southwest Scoffins Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan map, and requires a 60-foot ROW to meet current standards. The intersection of Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard is offset southerly from the intersection of Hunziker/Hall Boulevard. The City's ultimate goal is that this intersection should be reconstructed to eliminate the offset. However, no current plans exist for this work to be done. However, it is believed that the present alignment of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to this site will not be the ultimate location. For this reason, Staff does not believe it would be beneficial to the public to require the applicant to construct street improvements at this time. Rather, it would be more appropriate to require the applicant to enter into a street improvement agreement with the City, whereby they agree to participate in a future project that would include improvements to SW Scoffins Street (TDC 18.810.030.A.4). This agreement, and their future participation, would satisfy the TDC requirements. The applicant's plans show 2 proposed driveways on Scoffins Street that are of great concern to Staff. The driveways are proposed to be located near the western end of the site. One would serve as an access to the trash collection area and the other appears to serve a garage door on the building. The latter access could essentially be used as a loading access, which could result in vehicles or trucks attempting to back into the access from the street. This is not an acceptable access use, especially since Scoffins Street is a minor collector street with significant traffic volumes. In addition, there are sharp curves in the roadway to the west of this site that create a hazardous condition at present. Any cars or trucks entering or exiting the proposed driveways would conflict with eastbound vehicles traveling through the curves. The sight distance through the curves does not appear to be adequate. The City Engineer has the authority to review and approve proposed access locations and loading locations in accordance SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 19 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 with TDC 18.705.030.E and 18.765.080.B(1). Staff considers the proposed driveways to be unsafe and recommends the loading and trash collection areas be moved elsewhere on the site to where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. WATER: Water service can be provided to this site from the City's public water system. There is an existing water meter that serves this site. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Scoffins Street that can serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will extend a sewer service from the main line over to this site. This work will require a Street Opening Permit from the City. STORM DRAINAGE: This site is relatively flat, but has a slight slope toward the west. There is a partial storm drainage system in SW Scoffins Street, consisting of roadside ditch on the northerly side of the roadway that eventually enters a piped system to the west of this site. The applicant's engineer is proposing to collect the onsite runoff and convey the water into a new public storm drainage pipe in SW Scoffins Street that would be extended westerly in the roadway and discharged into the roadside ditch on the northerly side of the road. The engineer has determined that there is adequate capacity in the downstream system to handle the additional runoff from this site. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Scoffins Street and along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. The section applies to the frontage of the site from where utility service is provided. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines that provide service to the site. The frontages, and resultant fees, along this site are: SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 20 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 SW Scoffins Street: 145 feet Fee = $3,988 SW Hall Boulevard: 140 feet Fee = $3,850 ADDRESS ASSIGNMENTS: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). For parcels within the USB, an addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant's proposal does not meet all of the Street Utility and Improvement Standards. If the applicant complies with Conditions 1 through 9 at the beginning of this decision, the standards will be met. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Relationship to the natural and physical environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2.a states that buildings shall be: • Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; • Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; • Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and • Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The site is relatively flat and not subject to ground slumping or sliding. There are no natural drainageways located on the property. The Building Division has reviewed the proposal and provided comments. None of the comments indicate that the building location will impede fire fighting ability or light or circulation. The development is not residential, therefore, the requirement to be oriented with consideration to the sun and wind is not considered applicable. Tree removal and mitigation was previously addressed in this decision. FINDING: Because the building has been located with consideration to the natural environment and trees have been discussed previously in this decision, Staff finds that the relationship to the natural and physical environment standard has been satisfied. Section 18.360.090.A.2.b. states that trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790., Tree Removal. The site plan indicates that 2 large trees will be removed. The trees could have been saved if the building had been designed differently. For example, the building could be located closer to the south and west property lines, it could be a 2-story structure, the square footage could be smaller, the west buffer area could be reduced from 15 feet to 10 feet by the addition of a wall or the building could be designed along SW Hall Boulevard as recommended by Tri- Met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the proposal does not satisfy the Site Development Review criteria relating to preservation of the natural and physical environment. CONDITION:Submit a revised site plan retaining the 2 trees over 26 inches in caliper as noted on the plan. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 21 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.36O.090.A.4.a. states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall b,e considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: The proposal is providing a 15-foot-wide buffer between a retail use and single-family dwellings. This criterion was previously discussed in this decision. Section 1.8.36O.O9O.A.4.b. states that on site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. Screening of parking areas, services areas and the proposed trash/recycling enclosure has been addressed earlier in this decision under the specific provisions of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.36O.090.A.8. states that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. According to FEMA floodplain information, the site is not located within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site does not abut a floodplain, Staff finds that this standard does not apply to this application. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: Section 18.360.09O.A.9.a. states that the structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and Section 18.36O.O9O.A.9.b. states that areas may be defined by, but not limited to the following: • A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; • A trellis or arbor; • A change in elevation or grade; • A change in the texture of the path material; • Sign; or • Landscaping. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 22 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The site plan indicates that the site is differentiated from the street by landscaping and street trees. The walkway approaches to the building entrances provide a clear corridor for visitors and clients who need to gain access to the building. The landscaping and walkways ensure there is a transition from public to private property. Therefore, this standard is met. Crime prevention and safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10.a. states that windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; The elevation drawings indicate that 3 elevations are provided with windows. No windows are located along the west elevation where the storage facility is proposed. Section 18.360.090.A.10.d. states that the exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Section 18.360.090.A.10.e. states that light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has not submitted information regarding lighting levels. The Tigard Police Department commented on this proposal and requested a lighting plan for their review and approval. A condition of approval requires that the applicant submit a lighting plan that complies with this section. Therefore, this standard will be satisfied through compliance with the condition of approval. FINDING: If the applicant provides a lighting plan, this criterion would be met. CONDITION:Submit a lighting plan for review and approval by the Tigard Police Department. Public transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11.a. states that provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; Section 18.360.090.A.11.b.(1) & (2) state that the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on the following: • The location of other transit facilities in the area; and • The size and type of the proposal. Tri-Met was asked to address this issue. Tri-Met Staff recommends that the building be oriented closer to SW Hall Boulevard to encourage direct pedestrian access to the bus line located on SW Hall Boulevard. FINDING: Because Tri-Met recommends that the building be placed along SW Hall Boulevard to encourage pedestrian use, Staff has conditioned the application accordingly. CONDITION:The applicant shall take Tri- Met's recommendation into consideration to place the building along SW Hall Boulevard when revising the project to comply with the various Code requirements. Landscaping: Section 18.360.090.A.12.a. states that all landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. as follows: • A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The project will provide 24% of the site in landscaping. Therefore, this standard is met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 23 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.360.090.A.13. states that all drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Storm drainage is addressed earlier in this decision under Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Section 18.360.090.A.14. states that provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Accessibility of parking stalls is addressed earlier in this decision. Accessibility of walkways and structures will be addressed through the building permit process. Therefore, this standard is met. Section 18.360.090.A.15. states that all of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. No variance or adjustment is being requested. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: Drainage plans indicate manholes in the parking area and the Code requires catchbasins; Under provisions of the Tualatin Unified Fire District Ordinance, 2 hydrants will be required. Hydrants located on the opposite side of the street can not be used in calculating this requirement. STAFF RESPONSE: Comments submitted by the Building Division were made a condition of approval. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has requested that the applicant submit a lighting plan for the project. STAFF REPSONSE: Comments submitted by the Police Department were included in the conditions of approval. The City of Tigard Operations Department was given the opportunity to review the proposal and submit comments and offered no comments or objections. No other comments were received. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Tri-Met provided the following comments concerning this proposal: Tri-Met welcomes the opportunity to comment on this proposal for construction of A Superior Signs store at SW Hall Boulevard and SW Scoffins Street. This area is served by Tri-Met Line 78 on SW Hall Boulevard. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 24 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The purpose of our recommendations is to minimize the traffic impacts of new development by encouraging developing patterns that are transit, bicycle, and pedestrian supportive. Improved pedestrian access and connection promotes walking and reduces local dependence on automobiles. TRI-MET STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Orient the building towards the primary pedestrian network by moving it closer to Hall Boulevard. With Hall Boulevard being a transit corridor, emphasis should be placed on the pedestrian environment. Buildings are one of the strongest site design elements that can be used to support the pedestrian network. A building located close to the primary sidewalk increases pedestrian acknowledgement, provides direct, unimpeded access, and increases the legibility of the entire pedestrian network. In addition, proper building placement improves pedestrian safety by reducing the number of cross-traffic conflicts. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Kiser at 503-239-2102. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant will need to re-design the project to address various requirements. The City recommends that the applicant take into consideration Tri-Met's comments. Oregon Department of Transportation Staff, Marah Danielson provided the following comments: The proposed development is adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, SW Hall Boulevard has a District level of importance and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact safe and efficient use of this facility. We have reviewed the proposed site plan and have the following comments: 1. ODOT permits are required for access, all work in the State right-of-way, and connection to the State drainage system. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for permit application information. 2. The applicant is required to shift the proposed access to SW Hall Blvd. to their south property line to increase the distance from the SW Scoffins Street intersection and reduce potential vehicle conflict points in the vicinity of the highway intersection. 3. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage will be according to ODOT and ADA current standards. 4. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition of the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit peak runoff rate. The allowable peak runoff rate is based on predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. If you have questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 503-731-8258. Please forward a copy of the decision with conditions of approval when rendered on this case. STAFF COMMENTS: The conditions of approval reflect these comments. TCI Cable was given the opportunity to review the proposal. TCI returned the project proposal, but offered no comments. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R), NW Natural Gas and General Telephone (GTE) were given the opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 25 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) was given the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. No other comments were received. SECTION VII. NEIGHBOR COMMENTS Two letters concerning the proposed project were received from surrounding property owners. Craig and Carrie Prunty, who own the properties at 12645 SW Hall and 8725 SW Commercial, wrote a letter stating the following: We look forward to seeing improved buildings in the area. We hope the City approves. Gail V. Snyder wrote the second letter that stated as follows: As legal owner of 3 residences and properties (Tax Lots 201 , 202, and 203) located and adjacent to the west of the above property, I am concerned about preparations and planning for separating the 2 property use types: Commercial: (Applicant) and Residential: (My properties). It is appropriate that some kind of permanent sound and visual barrier is established by the developer of the subject property to avoid intermingling and providing the necessary safety and privacy issues with separating each activity. I request that a six foot high aesthetically pleasing concrete or block wall be provided by the developer on the common property line between our properties to separate these uses as a requirement for development by the City of Tigard. I will be happy to provide other information or appear in person to discuss the merits of this requirement, if requested. Please advise what action the City of Tigard is taking to satisfy this requirement. I apologize I was unable to deliver this in a more timely fashion having just returned from a business trip to receive your notice. Please accept this response into your planning process, as a genuine and timely request. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 26 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 STAFF RESPONSE: The Staff report discussed the various options required by the Tigard Community Development for screening the proposed retail use from the adjoining residences. The City is requiring the applicant to redesign the project so he may wish to consider a wall along the west property line which would reduce the screening width requirement from 20 feet to 10 feet. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: © The applicant and owners © Owner of record within the required distance © Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON APRIL 22, 1999 AND EFFECTIVE ON MAY 7, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON MAY 6, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 1 2--Q April 22, 1999 PREPARED BY: Doris Michael DATE Associate Planner April 22, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manage i:\curpin\doris\sdr\SDRr99-03superior signsDEC,doc SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 27 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 -r l'y Ti• 54'.1• r1• Y.4. a S.W. SCOFFINS ST. Ma o Cr nano.m.. . .K. I•.Y' .W(T W , r l����11 !�I!¢J���—_ ��I��. ft...Ft .III —— —r y�� at, 1 Jt i 4J{R{ .� f r41w.E s � ` (}I d s of xt, is j f 1 ''/^� r* , n i• 1 1r �' iF` trd� p ;. . Jy! ' I, �ii V/ i _ f,1�Is> fi�/14Y I k t :1,,,,,,:,::-,e F l h .f,,1• i '( �'( �ddTq xiAwi��ei } j 'y4�a'�P si C'{�i � fi� cacW 0 t I� �F •f , y`? S�uy� 9 r�t,"��X1 r'�a Kl iii� Li p coc*A 0 • �k� .-+� �, Y\ r r s;:-t,� .K• l k G. ;f° ; /. To r ry eu 6y a 1 G � fk 0 0� I { r d u PARKING J Z r I +� ,I 7r Y I !. i a�•I4 ` syIrFAk � { Yka9 � ` ' K$ J� . I.. � a kt `! t' a` r t" s I 3 cn CI Ce uc.a.a ----- if v tij Art v_, -,, \r*` y 4� '' Villi \`% Esc.wuc �.`' IP • I PARKING / sa...g.. /a j V�` / 4 a/ U ' / eh PROJECT DATA CONS TRUCTON7ON TYRE Y-M ''��`� SLUM° HEIGHT 4 STORY 1 14'-0• S a AREA man PI.JIJ f,%VF. A.C.PAYN° AREA 5.104 SF. CONC. WALK AREA 531 IF to ENICAPE AREA 1,7711 SF.W.iU UTE AREA 14,71.3 1F. KOO.PAPRAa .. M. u4 VrACE! ►ARCM)PROVIDED 11 7ACq SITE PLAN T SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING EXHIBIT MAP N SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SOB)99-0003 (map is not to scale) S � CITY of TIGARD r ' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM r ::. N PL . VICINITY MAP es, ti $011 00-0003• m cl .rti �� a SUPERIOR . ♦ SIGHS ti 4444tr Wial. BUILDING SUBJEC ' , ,� �`� . PARCEL 9 2o,T0,</ is, '• A 4P* 41 N . z> 0 100 200 300 400 Feet # ,4#40• `yj��'�i� T�300 feet , , . 4.i#61 ,9'A�J City of Tigard Information on this map is(or general location only and • should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd /AL Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639.1171 http:/Avw39igard.or.us Community Development • Plot date: Mar 25, 1999; C:\rnagicIMAGIC03.APR FILE MEMORANDUM 4/28/99 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR) 99-0003 Al S ill CITY OF TIGARD SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Community(Development Shaping Better Community This modifies the Impact Study section of the Site Development Review Director's Decision issued on April 22, 1999, and addresses the rough proportionality test for the additional right-of- way. CASE: SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 99-0003 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Site Development Review for the construction of a 6,139 square foot retail building. APPLICANT: Michael Candianides OWNER: Jack Mayeaux 7235 SW Bonita Road 12525 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district allows for civic, retail and office uses centered in the City's historic downtown. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Chapters 18.390 (Decision-Making CRITERIA: Procedures). Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real FILE MEMORANDUM SDR 99-0003-SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 2 property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant did not submit an Impact Study. However, the site is currently developed with access to all City services and to an improved street. The applicant is proposing to construct paved parking, landscaping and install street trees in conjunction with the proposed retail building. A new driveway is being proposed along SW Hall Boulevard, which will result is some new street improvements along this road. SW Hall Boulevard is designated as an arterial on the Tigard Transportation Plan. According to the plan, the frontage along SW Hall Boulevard will need to be increased to 45 feet from the centerline, which is estimated to be 15 feet. According to the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance, 32% of a project's impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard on arterial and collector streets. This leaves 68% unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the equation provided by the Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995. The proposed retail building will generate additional vehicle trips on the City' street system. The added trips will take up capacity on the City street system that must be accommodated by infrastructure improvements. According to the TIF ordinance, a small specialty retail center use has a trip generation factor of 40.68 trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the applicant has proposed to develop 6,139 square feet of retail use, this new use would be expected to generate 249.61 vehicle trips per day. The retail/commercial per trip TIF assessment is $48 according to the Washington County TIF ordinance. Using the above, the unmitigated impact of the proposal is as follows: Full Impact 249.61 x $150.00 = $37,441.50 Less TIF Assessment 249.61 x $ 48.00 = $11 ,981.28 Unmitigated $25,460.22 The applicant is being required to dedicate an additional 15 feet (1 ,905 square feet) of right-of-way along SW Hall Boulevard. Based on the City's CIP budget for purchases of property for street ROW, property is assessed at $3 per square foot. Assuming a cost of $3 per square foot, it is estimated that the total cost of the dedication of SW Hall Boulevard is $5,715. (1905 sq. ft. x $3). Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $11 ,981 .28. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this project's traffic impact is $37,441 .50 ($11,981 .28 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $11 ,981.28, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $25,460.22. Given these estimates ($5,715 dedication), the dedication requirement more than meets the roughly proportional standard and does not exceed the unmitigated impact. The cost of the street improvements is not reviewed for proportionality since adequate improvements are available and none are required, as the requirement to have access to a commercial site from an approved street is necessary to meet the minimum City standards for pedestrian-vehicular safety and drainage. The street improvement and dedication requirements are discussed in the decision under Street and Utility Improvements Standards. is\curpin\doris\sdr\SDR 99-03 memo 4-28-99.dot FILE MEMORANDUM SDR 99-0003—SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 2 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOSR,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES 1 HAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMP I.Y FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION Apo zinly SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Comuu nity�Deve(opment Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 25, 1999 PROPOSAL: SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 99-0003 This is a request for Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON THURSDAY— APRIL 8, 1999. All comments should be directed to Doris Michael, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS FAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIF OR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." O CiTYOf TIGARD - EN PL VICINITY MAP S*41cs,s� r�°� SDR 00-0003 k �� , SUPERIOR i, 44# W SIGNS SUBJEC BUILDING PARCEL ti . 1=• s� • • • N 0 90 City of Tigard M1«m.S,,on this map I.br yen.nl b5a5on prr and Novi.1 be verified erm M Development 5«Noe.Orvi.ion. 13125 SW H.N BNd Tip.rd,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 99w0 or us r.emmrin»1,flovo)nnmenl Plot date'Mar 25,1999:C:4naaic\MAGIC03.APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS From: Property owner of 12645 SW Hall & 8725 SW Commercial Craig&Carrie Prunty To: City of Tigard Doris Michael Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Superior Signs Building Site Development Review(SDR)99-0003 We look forward to seeing improved buildings in the area. We hope the city approves. 67;(74...g Craig&Came Prunty /2 e cL 3)io/9f April 8, 1999 Gail V. Snyder 14460 S.W. 141st Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97224 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ATTN: Doris Michael, Associate Planner Planning Division RE: Response to "Notice of Pending Land Use Application Site Development Review" Superior Signs Building SDR 99-0003 12525 S.W. Hall Blvd., WCTM 2S102AD, TAX Lot 00100 As legal Owner of three(3) residences and properties (Tax Lots 201 , 202 and 203) located adjacent and to the west of above property, I am concerned about preparations and planning for separating the two property use types: Commercial: (Applicant) and Residential: (My properties). It is appropriate that some kind of permanent sound and visual barrier is established by the developer of the subject property to avoid intermingling and providing the necessary safety and privacy issues necessary with separating each activity. I request that a six(6) foot high estheticly pleasing concrete or block wall be provided by the developer on the common property line between our properties to separate these uses as a requirement for development by the City of Tigard. I will be happy to provide other information or appear in person to discuss the merits of this requirement, if requested. Please advise what action the City of Tigard is taking to satisfy this requirement. I apologize I was unable to deliver this in a more timely fashion having just returned from a business trip to receive your notice. Please accept this response into your planning process, as a genuine and timely request. Sincerely, Gail V. Snyder, Owner ed 41/4 --/ UPONP.THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DI' 'TOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH "CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTS `c--°RMIT OR ACTION. ,. .. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice Is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which :s entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCL-AYoI!AAL .FORREV1EW- The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ■•---- -7—\:-!- - - - - -r ‘, -- .- \------------- f\ . { 10 '/ --'‘'- - \�. `\ i -- --, 1 .GARa.M_.__ I— ,,, ( VICINITY MAP 4., r \>\�� \ I I ---------====a °;� i 19 - _ SUR 09 0003;�� ,'''1:S'\ .,,' '1 ititH._ _1 1 /-------------, 1 \ \ z‘` /2\ '`,/ V 1 1 H.--___:11:4-Lij 7-_, =====_-,..=. = .* / .,-- \ ., , �, .\ � SUPERIOR �r�, \\, \ . .-- ' r . 1� _.,� / SIGNS \ \ / / l BUILDING \ ,\ - r- jsuaJ C / •�'\,-.5 �.. \ ��` PARCEL I \o qo ,\ \ j '' / ''''' / / 4, lks, � \ N \\\.2\,\,, , I \ u ,Ig ��\ ee..•. ..aw.4 r.e.v. 1.06.1.00". .a.......ca m■M 0.11/>1...4..1 S."4..awn. hMI VIN Nel MN og.OR eN7 , \ /�.- ___... _. m inky nov.i,nn.nl _ ------- --. . -15101e: 'eS.101:Z1MH QTWAPR FLA. '11.461 1tL 5$ - -0003 " Department of Transportation regon Region 1 - 123 NW Flanders John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 FILE CODE: May 3, 1999 PLA9-2A-TIG-141 Superiorsigncond5&21.doc City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 FQ) ECEFfil U1. Attn: Brian Rager, Engineering Dept. MAY 4 1999 Re: SDR 99-0003 - Superior Signs CITY Y OF TIGARD Conditions of Approval #5 and 21 Dear Mr. Rager: This letter is to clarify ODOT's position regarding the above-referenced conditions of approval. Condition #5 Condition #5 requires the conveyance of right of way on Hall Blvd./OR 141 to ODOT. The condition states to increase the right of way to 45 feet from centerline (or as ODOT otherwise directs.)" In consultation with staff, we have determined that ODOT will not be requesting right of way beyond that which would be needed for a 3-lane section. The existing half street right of way is 30 feet with a 5 foot utility easement. We recommend that the 5 foot utility easement be required to be dedicated to ODOT for right of way purposes. This is provide width for a continuous left turn lane (which is lacking on this portion of Hall Blvd.) which will serve vehicles entering and exiting the subject property. If the City requires additional right of way for a future 5-lane section, the right of way may be conveyed to Oregon Department of Transportation. Condition #21 ODOT previously issued a permit for a driveway for the location shown on the approved site plan. We are continuing discussion with the applicant, and there is the potential that this driveway may be relocated to the south property line. However, we request that this be stricken as a condition of approval, since the Department cannot require location of the driveway at this point in time. Please contact me at 731-8282 if you have questions regarding the above. The applicant is working with Sam Hunaidi and Ed Miller at District 2A for followup on this case. They may be reached at 229-5002. Form 734-1850(1/98) City of Tigard: SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs 2 ODOT Recommended Revisions to Conditions of Approval May 3, 1999 Thank you for providing a copy of the Decision for our review. I would appreciate receiving a copy of the revised Decision if the City determinesthat it will need to re-issue. Sincerely, 4A-t-ga Sony azen, Development Review Coordinator cc: Sam Hunaid, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Marty Jensvold, Traffic, ODOT Region 1 Marah Danielson, ODOT Region 1 05/03%99 MON 16: 14 FAX 503 731 8267 PUBLIC AFFAIRS REG ONE 0001 Ott: IIIregon Department of Transportation o Region 1 123 NW Flanders • t1_0 John A.Kltzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 FILE CODE: May 3, 1999 PLA9.2A-TIG-1 d1 superlorslgncond5&21.doc City of Tigard — 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Post-It'Far Note 7671 Date #of Attn: Brian Rager, Engineering Dept. - s �,. a Re: SDR 99-0003 - Superior Signs Conditions of A2 roval #5 and 21 " �g _7 Dear Mr. Pager This letter is to clarify ODOT's position regarding the above-referenced conditions of approval. Condition #5 Condition #5 requires the conveyance of right of way on Hall Blvd_IOR 141 to ODOT_ The condition states "to increase the right of way to 45 feet from centerline (or as ODOT otherwise directs.)" In consultation with staff, we have determined that ODOT will not be requesting right of way beyond that which would be needed for a 3-lane section. The existing half street right of way is 30 feet with a 5 foot utility easement. We recommend that the 5 foot utility easement be required to be dedicated to ODOT for right of way purposes. This is provide width for a continuous left turn lane (which is lacking on this portion of Hall Blvd.) which will serve vehicles entering and exiting the subject property. If the City requires additional right of way for a future 5-lane section, the right of way may be conveyed to Oregon Department of Transportation. Condition #21 ODOT previously issued a permit for a driveway for the location shown on the approved site plan. We are continuing discussion with the applicant, and there is the potential that this driveway may be relocated to the south property line. However, we request that this be stricken as a condition of approval, since the Department cannot require location of the driveway at this point in time. Please contact me at 731-8282 if you have questions regarding the above. The applicant is working with Sam Hunaidi and Ed Miller at District 2A for followup on this case. They may be reached at 229-5002. Pterm 732-1850(1/98) 05/03/99 MON 16:14 FAX 503 731 8267 PUBLIC AFFAIRS REG ONE 002 City of Tigard: SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs 2 ODOT Recommended Revisions to Conditions of Approval May 3, 1999 Thank you for providing a copy of the Decision for our review. I would appreciate receiving a copy of the revised Decision if the City determinesthat it will need to re-issue. Sincerely, Sony azen, Development Review Coordinator cc: Sam I-iunaid, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Marty Jensvold, Traffic, ODOT Region 1 Marah Danielson, ODOT Region 1 vA)79f cry._ - at D PO r Qbo C- h CIY - htM-e_ S ate_ 6' 0. _b a st_ 1 -t-9 _x -- -1)0-'-A-d Lk.,t ems,.ems DATE: 1 PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.: SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 189.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 48.00 OFFICE $ 174.00 INDUSTRIAL $ 182.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 79.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY OESCRI OF WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE I L( Zelkca TRIP RATE BASIS: (� � x -�17.(r x �D CALCULATIONS: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 Urn UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Doris Michael, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA SUBJECT: Superior Signs Building, SDR 99-0003 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 o REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community(Development �+P Shaping)]Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: Julia Huffman,Unified Sewerage Agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Ix 3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 99-0003 ➢ SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING Q REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, ; 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY-APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. (-. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ti� c ''�(rPlease provide thefolCowing information) Name of Person[sl Commenting: k�A1. 4-)z6 Phone Number[sl: ;=-)4-A- 4 SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Li no.ro :'� 1w •r , M r r� r�. S.W. SCOFFINS ST. PIM CI OP 1111~1117" IN FE 4"17111114a 141" 0 NA 47 di I MOE t 1 t+ a �4 ;. \ 1 a } s III Cr) _L _ ' i rl., �. pit ' A `, i ( �q ` • • t7 �� 'a, 9:,ti.'��s1ia�'+ w?'{:. .�'}�.�tfe,x7 a x ! ¢ - 9i rwc..w�c t 0 •... aj. if O rs a F� t �t,k)15)19/04:4•4,4, „, tti -- TO WI WOAD CI �,� , t..1,,Iii�A, 4 t*�'a •_, ' PARKING m #�` f; s r';‘,14s.� t f� 11 rk: ` tc i i i 1' ��,>fki^ar�-'a1�`t2 i t( tlt f� �i r:','0,..1:,,! ‘1;14'.; tR 'a",# I J it. 4\;,�~ F,�\ ;\I��}! E �a ,Iis t l:l; lL� :fy J a. L 2 4 "1 I ,00.�w N Q. ; 1 I q ; J., Li. IE L •----- J AL 'w I ''' ki . .4"1 biy. t '1--1 al.11f el // 7,/ a ,,.ra It v �Il I LL iri, Owc.OM 44* .%44..,. .kf44%/4 ,b, rel '"� . �� l PARKING ii t d PPS A__,TO 1111•111411/0..'"'i I 1 PROJECT DATA ■47``��A,►`. s4 ... T� f ZOOM CVO OCGPAJICY K . s,�••/ COIITRUCTIOM TYPE Yi! ,I�`, At.4 ZRIF Y .(7 l.lD1q FEIOHT !STORY/11'-O' 1 1bLDM0 AREA {F•QT RA/ Lily IF AA t'AV•O AREA LIO1 IF. CORC. WALK AREA 1131 S.I. LAIDOCAPf AREA 3.771 1F.US eV SITE AREA $4TU IF RE OD NJKMO .• w 141 WAGES PAMMO PROVDED II VAC= SITE PLAN T SUPERIOR NS BUILDING EXHIBIT MAP N SITE DEVELOPMENT SIG REVIEW IL[SDIN RI 99-0003 (map is not to scale) e^ GEGGCITYrOf TIGARD MM r _.BEN PL 'I VICINITY MAP , 4 � co SDR 99-0003 co • imolt. ti �� SUPERIOR 004, SIGHS ilibiLlit, �"`— BUILDING � � SUBJEC % ,� , PARCEL "45, ti�2 �'r ot 4/ .pthili N 0 100 200 300 400 feat 41*S4141 IP/ 111111" 'k ' 57 ' 111F11110,111 • A 4 %-yo'''0,„ 1'=31x1 feel • 100,, ,4„ City of Tigard ,AA, . II. Information on this map is for general location ony end• should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13123 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 -- -- _ httpl/www.d.tigaM.a.us Community Development Plot date:Mar 25, 1999;C:rnagiclMAGIC03.APR �F . �,, t o Ye Ol l Department of Transportation '�'': z 1 Region 1 • '1123 NW Flanders -, r:_ John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 March 30, 1999 ILE CpDg FPLA9-2 1G-141 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Doris Michael Subject: Superior Signs Building Hall Blvd. X Scoffins St. Dear Ms. Michael, The proposed development is adjacent to Hall Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, Hall Blvd. has a District level of importance and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We have reviewed the proposed site plan and have the following comments: 1. ODOT permits are required for access, all work in the State right of way, and connection to the State drainage system. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 229-5002 for permit application information. 2. The applicant is required to shift the proposed access to Hall Blvd. to their south property line to increase the distance from the Scoffins St. intersection and reduce potential vehicle conflict points in the vicinity of the highway intersection. 3. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage will be according to ODOT and ADA current standards. 4. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable peak City of Tigard 1 Superior Signs ODOT Comments 3-30-99 Saved as: c: usr\a_marah\tig\superior Form 734-1850(1/98) ' ` request for is quest for based o required. study prepared connection to tehpredevelop me a registered g T storm runoff conditions. To e When rendered foans regarding a�5pg review fe storm dra;e a Thank d°n this case copy ofeea above com e may be Wage hank You, ecision With ondi l can be re �,, 411% tons o f approval d at March ranie son Planner Development C�- Ma Review Barn in JensvOld �lunaidt' Ed MiID/e r Region r °D0 r District 2q City of T' a SUperi gar °DOT C ml ments 3.30- Saved as: c uSrla m 99 arch ltig!superior 2 03. 30-99 17:24 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS 1J001 d!! q Department of Transportation ,. re on 123 NW Flanders John A.KiLzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 ___. . _ FAX(503)731-8259 March 30, 1999 Post;7 halo :ul pa7ea iLE Cpl Fax Note F76731 3.f 310K a Flub-. A 1G-141 To Dczn City of Tigard Fay; (' 5 �' Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. "DNA- N^-F`VA-S Tigard, OR 97223 Phona# 7 -j-,J z. - Aft: Doris Michael Subject: Superior Signs Building Hall Blvd. X Scoffins St. Dear Ms. Michael, The proposed development is adjacent to Hall Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, Hall Blvd. has a District level of importance and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient use of this facility. We have reviewed the proposed site plan and have the following comments: 1. ODOT permits are required for access, all work in the State right of way, and connection to the State drainage system. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 229-5002 for permit application information. 2. The applicant is required to shift the proposed access to Hall Blvd. to their south property line to increase the distance from the Scoffins St. intersection and reduce potential vehicle conflict points in the vicinity of the highway intersection. 3. Curb and sidewalks along the property's :iighway frontage will be according to ODOT and ADA current standards. 4. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the ?eak runoff rate. The allowable peak City of Tigard 1 Superior Signs ODOT Comments 3-30-99 Saved as: c: usr\a_marah\tig\superior c) hprm 734-1850(1/98) 03.30:99 17:25 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS i7J002 runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 731-8258. Please forward a copy of the decision with conditions of approval when rendered on this case. Thank you, Marah Danie son Planner Development Review Cc: Martin Jensvold, ODOT Region 1 Sam Hunaidi, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A City of Tigard 2 Superior Signs ODOT Comments 3-30-99 Saved as: c: usrla_marah\tig\superior Mar.-29-99 07 : 25A TCI St_Helens 503 397 5686 P.01 1•"i�11 C FAX COVER SHEET DATE: a 4.0 / 7ci TIME: TO: • 1. rt w ♦C- i♦ a e'ok:. . s aiitYliatt FROM: C A A e• . ": . c 412Z& TIOAr 117; TCI OF TUALATIN VALLEY 14200 S .W. BRIGACOON CT . BEAVERTON, OREGON 97005 PHONE: ( 503) 605-4895 FAX: ( 503) SaS-y866 NUMBER OF PAGES IN THIS r� TRANSMISSION INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET : : TO:at Tualatin Vasiey,Inc_ 142®S.W.Sn9adcon Court Beaverton,OR 97405 (501 505-4895 Pax;503)tra8400+ plar-,29-99 07 : 25A TCI St_ Helens 503 397 5686 P.02 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS `.-TI CITY OF?I©ARD t.)flrncrrr.:t_y+1.1e t:e&)pment !ut ter Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: Pat McGann,TCI Cahleu s onot Orman FROM: City el Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Dods--Michael Associate Planner Or 3111 Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 __.-_- SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(508199-ooa3 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING . REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520. 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 1 8.765, 18.790 18.795 and 1 8.800. _............-.f................................_........,..,................._...............,.,,,:-. ....gym-Y-r»-.. .,.e_._......,�.....v....—...p:... ...........:, ...........u.,....................-......._..-..........................................._..._.,� Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. It you wish to comment on this application, WE..NEED..Y...O4U.R..C.OMME.N.TS..BACK...E Y:THURSDAY-APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If....yok__a.rn_.unab1e.to-...respons _by...the._.above...date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact -.-__---__.� of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1(P*.usc prut.ide tfre fY1Iiinving i f inaction Name of Perseids)Commenting' Phone Ilumnar[sl: , SDR 99.0003 - _ _ ___....._..._.__ St 1PF.r21OR St(;NS HE Stl nlhEt: rr41+,rc r ewa rn„nmO ro S • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: April 14, 1999 TO: Doris Michael, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 99-0003, Superior Signs Building Description: This project is for a 5,197 square foot building located at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 100). Findings: 1 . Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. SW Hall Boulevard This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map and is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. This roadway classification requires a right-of- way (ROW) width of 90 feet. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW, in accordance with ODOT standards, to bring the width up to 45 feet from centerline. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curbing and the site has an existing driveway. ODOT has apparently indicated that the applicant's proposed access location will be approved, provided it is relocated southerly to provide more separation from the intersection at Scoffins Street. If ODOT requires additional improvements along SW Hall Boulevard, then the applicant will need to provide those improvements as a part of the project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 1 : • SW Scoffins Street SW Scoffins Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan map, and requires a 60-foot ROW to meet current standards. The intersection of Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard is offset southerly from the intersection of Hunziker/Hall Boulevard. The City's ultimate goal is that this intersection should be reconstructed to eliminate the offset. However, no current plans exist for this work to be done. However, it is believed that the present alignment of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to this site will not be the ultimate location. For this reason, Staff does not believe it would be beneficial to the public to require the applicant to construct street improvements at this time. Rather, it would be more appropriate to require the applicant to enter into a street improvement agreement with the City, whereby they agree to participate in a future project that would include improvements to SW Scoffins Street (TDC 18.810.030.A.4). This agreement, and their future participation, would satisfy the TDC requirements. The applicant's plans show two proposed driveways on Scoffins Street that are of great concern to Staff. The driveways are proposed to be located near the western end of the site. One would serve as an access to the trash collection area and the other appears to serve a garage door on the building. The latter access could essentially be used as a loading access, which could result in vehicles or trucks attempting to back into the access from the street. This is not an acceptable access use, especially since Scoffins Street is a minor collector street with significant traffic volumes. In addition, there are sharp curves in the roadway to the west of this site that create a hazardous condition at present. Any cars or trucks entering or exiting the proposed driveways would conflict with eastbound vehicles traveling through the curves. The sight distance through the curves does not appear to be adequate. The City Engineer has the authority to review and approve proposed access locations and loading locations in accordance with TDC 18.705.030.E and 18.765.080.B(1 ). Staff considers the proposed driveways to be unsafe and recommends the loading and trash collection areas be moved elsewhere on the site to where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. 2. Water: Water service can be provided to this site from the City's public water system. There is an existing water meter that serves this site. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Scoffins Street that can serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 2 S • extend a sewer service from the main line over to this site. This work will require a Street Opening Permit from the City. 4. Storm Drainage: This site is relatively flat, but has a slight slope toward the west. There is a partial storm drainage system in SW Scoffins Street, consisting of roadside ditch on the northerly side of the roadway that eventually enters a piped system to the west of this site. The applicant's engineer is proposing to collect the onsite runoff and convey the water into a new public storm drainage pipe in SW Scoffins Street that would be extended westerly in the roadway and discharged into the roadside ditch on the northerly side of the road. The engineer has determined that there is adequate capacity in the downstream system to handle the additional runoff from this site. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 3 S • 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Scoffins Street and along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. The code section applies to the frontage of the site from where utility service is provided. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines that provide service to the site. The frontages, and resultant fees, along this site are: SW Scoffins: 145 feet Fee = $ 3,988.00 SW Hall: 140 feet Fee = $ 3,850.00. 8. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). For parcels within the USB, an addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the public storm drainage work and ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 4 • sanitary sewer connection in SW Scoffins Street. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District, B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency, C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property, or D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 4. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline (or as ODOT otherwise directs). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 5 S # Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 6. The proposed access locations on SW Scoffins Street are not approved. No access is to be permitted on this street. The proposed trash collection and loading areas should be relocated elsewhere on the site where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 8. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 10. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 11. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Scoffins Street or SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. This fee also only applies to the frontage from where service is obtained for this site. If the fee option is chosen, the amounts for the two frontages will be as follows: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 6 ! • SW Scoffins Street $ 3,988.00 SW Hall Boulevard $ 3,850.00. The applicant must clearly show on their plans which street frontage will provide the electrical, phone and cable services, so the proper fee can be assessed. The fee shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 111ig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\comments\sdr99-0003.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs Building PAGE 7 di/ Att REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Au. CITY OF TIIGARD Community(Development SliapingA Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Ix 3111 Phone: [503)639-41/1/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 99-0003 ➢ SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY—APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Q\urnck, 413,M QVA c -kv\R_ Quo ir-A- • (Please provide the following information) Name of Personfsl Commenting: 61/„, vJo\c I Phone Humbertsl: XaaO I SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS _ 04/29/99 09:40 FAX 503 6403525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY I ]001/002 (\c\ -‘,F\ QUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD � RECEIVED PLANNING Community�7evefoptnent Shaping(Better Community APR 2 0 199 DATE: March 25 '99 -'� 9 TO: Julia Huffmarr;Unfied Sewerage Agency CITY OF TIGARD \r FROM: City o1 Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Lx 3111 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 15031 684-1291 w SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING < 7_, REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY-APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. •PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. �Cl Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: - rA (ja Y6� 1 1n.1 (cPfease provide the folrowing informations Name of Perseids)Commenting: Phone Humhertsl: - —6 .,•.,- prni iPcT FnR c'nmmFNTs 04/20/99 09:41 FAX 503 6403525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY I�J002/002 UXR4 ! f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1999 TO: Doris Michael, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman,USA 3 J SUBJECT: Superior Signs Building, SDR 99-0003 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties,or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Ix 3111 Phone: (5031639-41/1/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY-APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: l ( l -L k g 1 lAj — P1,i1 , ' �l D,e-4 PA-Al A 2i i kee,n14 MA - Cove eg.pu1/2£3 r�N bzKi,k �Z I UNaee -r7+5 proodi iidd s o,- TO O 4,4,tP 2. .1--ty propdm It)ie,' �� P.g-eit tat CC() U.X.44-rG6 On) -04.6 ocl 4 '2 cD CTREFFrc a/4. i t.l o'r be U s D I nl eiat eLA (A TZ A16, 26Q U r t /y16A.1 i (B(ease provide the foffowing information) Name of Persontsl Commenting: PPesc,�,3 Phone Numbertsl: " --7,61 2 SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TY OF CITY X TIGARD Community(Development SfiapingA Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Ix 311) Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR) 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY-APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA,E'EHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v I (Please provide t(e following information) Name of Personlsi Commenting: 1, / I Phone Number's): SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUI 'SING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Skaping,4 Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner[x 3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031604-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR]99-0003 > SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY—APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: A. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (rase provide the following information) Name of Persons)Commenting: p,2, I Phone Number[sl: '70- e, SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING g e. i 31 cif REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TRI-COUNTY METP `TITAN DocC#: TRANSPORTATION ,'RIOT OF OREGON CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION 710 NE HOLLADAY STREET TRI-MET PORTLAND,OREGON 97232 FAX COVER PAGE DATE: 4/8/99 NO.OF PAGES(Including cover) 2 TO: Doris Michael COMPANY: City of Tigard—Planning Division FAX NO.: 684-7297 FROM: Michael Kiser PHONE: 239-2102 FAX NO.: 239-2281 COMMENTS: Development Review comments for Superior Signs building(SDR 99-0003) ORIGINAL DOCUMENT WILL FOLLOW: ❑ Yes %No If this fax is incomplete please call(NAME) at(PHONE NUMBER) ducument4 04/08/99 TO:36dd L62L 1789 €0S:01 T822-622-20S 1N3Wd013f130 103t02ld:WO d T17:0T 66 80-add i*jil. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLII TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT yr OREGON DocC iiPPO412 CAPITAL PROJECTS&FACILITIES DIVISION TRI-MTRI-MET 710 N.E.HOLLADAY STREET ET OREGON 97232 April 8, 1999 Doris Michael City of Tigard —Planning Division 12512 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 99-0003—Superior Signs Building—City of Tigard Dear Ms. Michael: Tri-Met welcomes the opportunity to comment on this proposal for the construction of a Superior Signs store at SW Hall Boulevard and SW Scoffins Street. The area is served by Tri-Met Line 78 on Hall Boulevard. The purpose of our recommendations is to minimize the traffic impacts of new development by encouraging development patterns that are transit, bicycle, and pedestrian supportive. Improved pedestrian access and connection promotes walking and reduces local dependence on automobiles. TRI-MET STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Orient the building towards the primary pedestrian network by moving it closer to Hall Boulevard. With Hall Boulevard being a transit corridor, emphasis should be placed on the pedestrian environment. Buildings are one of the strongest site design elements that can be used to support the pedestrian network. A building located close to the primary sidewalk increases pedestrian acknowledgment, provides direct, unimpeded access, and increases the legibility of the entire pedestrian network. In addition, proper building placement improves pedestrian safety by reducing the number of cross-traffic conflicts. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 239-2102. Sincerely, • 46407 Michael Kiser, P ject Planner (503)238-RIDE- li f 238-5811 • http://www,tri-met.org k,lproj plan\phil-h lcomntcntaUl4Oltelgn.doc 20:3Eed L62L 1789 £0S:01 T822-622-20S 1N3Wd013(130 103rOi'ld:WOdd T17:0T 66 80-ddb REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 25,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael,Associate Planner Ix 317) Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR]99-0003 ➢ SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY—APRIL 8,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefoCfowing information) Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Numbertsl: I SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CITArea: [Cl [El [Sl Mil CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS to Place for review in library CITBookfsl FILE NOM: t.:, (> =, FILE NAME(S): s,---t_pe r - t n CITY OFFICES ADVANCED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Planning Supervisor_COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./PApmrn Svcs Teehna.ans VPOLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime preventbnorr.er V BUILDING DIV./David Scott,&mingoa<w V ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,o..pmnt Review Engineer /WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,uuilesManager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,CCyRecorder h OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*"L TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* :_UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN • OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Neighbrnd.Gourd. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth ManagernentCoordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA's2OA's) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(0130T) WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Brent Curtis(ceAs) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ✓ODOT,REGION 1 * _Scott King(CPAs) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,Deleon Rev Gourd _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Jim Tice(GA:) David Knowles,Planning Bureau On Portland,OR 97209-4037 Tom Harry(Durres PI Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Phil Healy(Current Pl.Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _Sr.Cartographer(CPNZCA)r.S t. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Perrnrt speaalist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 ODOT, REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS �/ICI CABLEVISION OF OREGON V TRI ET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann chael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 land,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Z v PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC "NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY v GENERAL TELEPHONE / 1!U EST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering atty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: 0R030546 " 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 * - IMOICATtS AUTOMATIC mortrICAPIOM IF WITHIN TOO' OF rag SNSJCCV PROPERTY FOR ANr/ALA eery PROJCCT$. (PROJ'tCT PLANpt&IS RLSPO/ISIBLS FOR INOICAFINC DARIItS 10 NOTIFY; h\patty\masters\rfcnohce mst 15-Mar-99 MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFn1ARD Community Development - Shaping Better Community STATE OAF OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of7igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (c]reac Appropriate Box(s)Below} ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR 99-0003/SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL_BUILDING AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) Q City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . / AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR: •l_ AMENDED NOTICE (File No'Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (TypeMind of Notice) FOR: I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on the 22"d a - of ApriI,1999, and eposited in the United States Mail on the 22nd day of April,1999, postage prepaid. / , • ,A, . /(---, _ (Person tha •repared otice) Subscribed and sworn/aimed before me on the L� `, day of -,M _J a , 19 ��. OFFICIAL SEAL II*4 11,4 /',AL `v"' DIANE M JELDERKS I I I I ' t�!„ ` "� NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON / C \;, COMMISSION NO.046142 My Commission Expire.. j/ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 L L NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 99-0003 CIT_FHOARD Community Development SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Shaping j4 Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/20/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: SUPERIOR SIGNS RETAIL BUILDING Site Development Review SDR 99-0003 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Site Development Review for the construction of a one (1)-story, 5,197 square foot retail building on a 14,375 square foot lot. APPLICANT: Michael Candianides OWNER: Jack Mayeaux 7235 SW Bonita Road 12525 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District; CBD. The CBD zoning district allows for civic, retail and office uses centered in the City's historic downtown. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. APPLICABLE Community Development Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); REVIEW 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.520 (Central Business District CRITERIA: Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.780 (Signs); 18.790 (Tree Removal); and 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS. (Unless otherwise specified, the Staff contact is Brian Rager with the Engineering Department at 503-639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the public storm drainage work and sanitary sewer connection in SW Scoffins Street. The applicant will need to submit 5 copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City whereby they agree to complete or participate in the future improvements of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to the subject property, when any of the following events occur: A. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for by the formation of a Local Improvement District; B. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be financed or paid for in whole or in part by the City or other public agency; C. when the improvements are part of a larger project to be constructed by a third party and involves the sharing of design and/or construction expenses by the third party owner(s) of property in addition to the subject property; or D. when construction of the improvements is deemed to be appropriate by the City Engineer in conjunction with construction of improvements by others adjacent to the subject site. 4. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation (ODOT), Highway Division, along the frontage of Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline (or as ODOT otherwise directs). The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 503-731-8461). 6. The proposed access locations on SW Scoffins Street are not approved. No access is to be permitted on this street. The proposed trash collection and loading areas should be relocated elsewhere on the site where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 8. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages and at completion of the construction. Prior to the final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact for the following conditions will be Doris Michael, Planning Division 503-639-4171 x317. 10. Provide a revised parking plan that shows the pedestrian accessway connecting the main walkway in front of the retail building to the public sidewalk being a minimum of 4 feet wide. 11 . The applicant shall submit a revised plan that shows the location of the service facilities such as the gas meter and air conditioner, and demonstrate compliance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. 12. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing a minimum 3-foot space for the street trees (minus the parking overhang area). The proposed Goldenrain tree at the corner of SW Hall and SW Scoffins Street shall be replaced with a smaller tree and moved to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded. The plan shall note that the Flame Maple trees shall be pruned to be a tree. 13. The site plan shall indicate the type and size of the fence that shall be located and maintained along the west property line. 14. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and detailed trash enclosure design to the Franchise Hauler for review and approval. The plans shall be of sufficient detail for the Franchise Hauler to determine that the applicable design and access standards are met. The site plan shall show a new location for the trash enclosure (not off SW Scoffins) and that the storage container gate will be made of solid wood, not chain link with slats as proposed. 15. The applicant shall submit a revised vehicle-parking plan showing that the proposed parking space dimension (length) complies with the City standard. 16. A detailed bicycle parking design shall be provided demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 18.765.050.C. and that the proposed bicycle parking design would accommodate 6 spaces for a 5,197 square foot building (or 7 spaces for a 6,139 square foot building). SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 17. The applicant shall address the parking needs for the 942 square foot storage area by one the following ways: (a) Submit a revised parking plan adding 3 parking spaces; (b) Revise the building plans to eliminate the 942 square foot storage area; or (c) Obtain a parking reduction to reduce the off-street parking requirement. 18. Submit a revised site plan retaining the 2 trees over 26 inches in caliper noted on the proposed plan. Submit an arborist report explaining what tree protection measures should be taken to ensure that they are not damaged during construction. Submit a revised landscape plan indicating the size of all of the trees that will be retained so Staff can determine if a tree protection plan and deed restriction are needed. If for some reason the 2 trees mentioned above must be removed, the applicant shall submit a tree mitigation plan. The plan shall show how the 56 inches will be provided on-site, off-site, or payment with a fee in-lieu. The proposed mitigation plan must be approved prior to issuance of the building permit; however, actual mitigation is not required to be complete until the occupancy stage. 19. Submit an arborist report indicating what measures will be taken to ensure that the oak tree located south of the subject parcel will not be impacted by project design. 20. A lighting plan shall be provided for review and approval by the Tigard Police Department. Staff Contact: Jim Wolfe, Police Department (503-639-4171 x220). 21. Submit a revised site plan relocating the driveway along the south property line as requested by ODOT. 22. The applicant shall take Tri-Met's recommendation into consideration to place the building along SW Hall when revising the project to comply with the various requirements. 23. Submit a revised site plan showing the location of wheel stops or that the pavement will be 4 inches tall to prevent vehicles from overhanging more than 3 feet into the landscape islands. 24. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall address the Building Division comments about the catchbasin design and the need for 2 hydrants. Staff Contact: Robert Poskin (503-639-4171 x392). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: 25. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 26. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Scoffins Street or SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. This fee also only applies to the frontage from where service is obtained for this site. If the fee option is chosen, the amounts for the 2 frontages will be as follows: SW Scoffins Street $3,988 SW Hall Boulevard $3,850 The applicant must clearly show on their plans which street frontage will provide the electrical, phone and cable services so the proper fee can be assessed. The fee shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The current property owner and his father obtained various sign, mechanical and plumbing building permits on the site since 1989. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, at the southwest corner of SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered as follows: (a) north by SW Scoffins Street; (b) east by SW Hall Boulevard; (c) south by an engineering office; and 4) west by residential uses. Single-family residential uses are located to the west of the site and multi-family uses are to the north. Carlson Testing, Inc., Cascade Motorcycle Shop and Snyder Roofing are located to the east of the subject site. Southwest Hall Boulevard is improved with a sidewalk, curb and gutter. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is .33 acres or approximately 14,375 square feet in size. It contains a residence and an upholstery shop. Both buildings are approximately 600 square feet in size. Trees (including a 26-inch-wide fir and a 30-inch-wide pine), shrubs and a gravel paving area are located on the site. The applicant proposes a one-story 5,197 square foot retail building along the westerly half of the site. 942 square feet of storage is proposed to be located in a second story. The building is located approximately 15 feet from the west property line and 10 feet from the south property line. The building will be located about 5 feet from the north property line and 50 feet from the east property line. A 15-space parking lot, including one (1) handicapped stall, is located to the east and south of the proposed building. Two additional driveways are proposed along the north side of the site along SW Scoffins Street. One (1) driveway provides access to the trash collection area with the second one providing access to an enclosed car bay. A 2-space bicycle parking rack is proposed south of the building, west of the handicapped stall. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: Section 18.360.030.A provides that Site Development Review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. In compliance with Section 18.390.040, a pre-application conference was held in 1998. An application for Site Development Review was submitted and subsequently deemed complete on March 24, 1999. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision was given as required by Section 18.390.040.C. The relevant approval criteria are addressed below with respect to the factual information provided by the applicant and are the basis for this Director's decision. Section 18.360.090 states that the Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this Title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.730, Exceptions to Development Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage; 8.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.780, Signs; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters: 18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Lands; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Impact Study — Chapter 18.390: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has not submitted an Impact Study. However, the site is currently developed with access to all City services and to an improved street. The applicant is proposing to construct paved parking, landscaping and install street trees in conjunction with the proposed retail building. Completion of the improvements as proposed will satisfy the City's adopted street standards. Commercial Zoning District — Chapter 18.520: Section 18.520.020. states that the Central Business District (CBD) zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central business district, centered at the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single-family detached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent to the R-12 zoning district, and multi-family housing at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R-40 zoning district, are permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with drive-up windows, medical centers, major event entertainment and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. Permitted Uses: Table 18.520.1. lists permitted, restricted, conditional and not-permitted uses in the commercial zoning districts. The applicant is proposing to build a retail building containing 3 separate spaces. A proposed sign shop will occupy the middle retail space. Sign shops are similar to copy shops, which are listed as permitted uses in the CBD zone as a personal service use. The use of the 2 additional spaces is unknown at this time. However, only those uses allowed in the CBD zone will be allowed to locate in the proposed building. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Dimensional Requirements: The CBD Zoning District standards are contained in Table 18.520.2. STANDARD CBD PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None N/A Minimum Lot Width None N/A Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Side facing street on corner & through lots 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Side yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Rear yard 0/30 ft. [7] N/A - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- Maximum Height 80 ft. [8] 32.5 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 80% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [7] There are no setback requirements, except 30 feet where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. [8] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. The table above compares the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the CBD zone. The front, side and rear yard setbacks do not apply because the site does not abut residential zoning. FINDING: Based on the above information, the applicant's proposal meets or exceeds the dimensional standards of the CBD zoning district. Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: 18.705.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.705.030.F. states that pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan indicates that a walkway will be provided between the 3 building entrances and the proposed public sidewalk. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) standards; The proposed walkway in front of the commercial building exceeds the 4-foot minimum width requirement by one-foot for a total of 5 feet. The proposed walkway through the parking lot connecting the sidewalk in front of the building to the public sidewalk is approximately 3 feet wide, which is less than the 4-foot minimum width requirement. Walkway design will be evaluated for compliance with ADA standards at the time of site and building permits. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The site plan indicates that walkways will be surfaced in concrete. Safety issues, including lighting and signage, are addressed later in this decision. Section 18.705.030.1.1 states that vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3: TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS - COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES REQUIRED PARKING MINIMUM #OF MINIMUM ACCESS MINIMUM PAVEMENT SPACES DRIVEWAYS REQUIRED WIDTH 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 50' 40' curbs required This project proposes a 15-stall parking lot along the east and south side of the site. A 24-foot-wide paved driveway is proposed to provide access to the proposed parking lot. This application as proposed meets this standard. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; The proposed parking lot is within 8 feet of the proposed 3 easterly entrances. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. No truck traffic requirements are appropriate since the proposed use is a small retail use. Section 18.705.030.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Superior Signs proposes to provide on-site parking, which satisfies this provision. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, Staff finds that the proposed development satisfies all of the applicable development standards of Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation. CONDITION: Provide a revised parking plan that shows the pedestrian accessway connecting the main walkway in front of the retail building to the public sidewalk being a minimum of 4 feet wide. Exceptions to Development Standards — Chapter 18.730: Section 18.730.040.A. provides for additional setback from specified roadways. To ensure improved light, air, and sight distance and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, structures in any zoning district which abut certain arterial and collector streets shall be set back a minimum distance from the centerline of the street. Where the street is not improved, the measurement shall be made at right angles from the centerline or general extension of the street right-of-way as follows: Arterial Streets: The required setback distance for buildings on arterial streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus the following distances measured from the centerline of the street as contained in Table 18.730.1. Collector Streets: The required setback distance for buildings on the following collector streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street as contained in Table 18.730.1. Southwest Hall Boulevard is an Arterial which requires a total building setback of 45 feet from the street centerline. Southwest Scoffins Street is a local street. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Section 18.745.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section 18.760.040.C.), and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The following are the development standards that are applicable to this proposal: Street Trees: Section 18.745.040.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. The subject property has frontage on SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard, which are more than 100 feet in length. The applicant's landscape plan indicates 10 street trees will be planted. Section 18.745.040.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant's landscape plan proposes planting 2 Goldenrain trees and 8 Flame Maple trees along the 2 street frontages. Goldenrain trees are slow or moderate growing to 20 to 35 feet with a 10 to 40-foot spread. Flame Maple trees grow to 20 feet tall with a twenty-foot spread. According to the City Arborist Mark Tuohey, Flame Maple trees need to be properly pruned as they have a tendency to grow as a shrub and not be a good shade tree. One Goldenrain tree and 4 Flame Maple trees are proposed along each street frontage (SW Scoffins Street and SW Hall Boulevard). The spacing for the Maple trees is 16 feet, which complies with the City's standard. The spacing for the Goldenrain trees is 24 feet, which complies with the standard. The proposed Goldenrain tree at the corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Scoffins Street may need to be replaced and moved slightly to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded as the tree would possibly interfere with the line. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned CBD. The land to the north, west and south are also zoned CBD. The land across SW Hall Boulevard is zoned Industrial Park (I-P) and Light Industrial (I-L). According to the above-referenced matrices, development in CBD zoning district does not require buffering and screening from land in the CBD, I-P or I-L zoning districts. Buffering, however, is required when residential uses abut a CBD use. Three attached single-family dwellings are located to the west of the subject site. Per the matrices, a buffer is required along the west property line. The proposed site plan shows a 15-foot landscaped buffer along the west property line. The matrices show that either a 20-foot, 15-foot or 10-foot buffer may be provided to satisfy the buffer requirement. Per the Code, the minimum spacing for trees per linear foot of buffer is 10 feet, with the maximum spacing being 20 feet. The buffer landscape plan proposes 3 Western Red Alder trees and an existing Cherry tree within an area that is 74 feet long. In order to be able to have a 15-foot buffer, a 6-foot solid wood fence must be provided. The application does not indicate the size or type of fence that is existing or is proposed along the west property line. Therefore, the site plan needs to be revised indicating the size and type of fence or wall that will be provided to reduce the 20-foot buffer requirement. The buffer width could be reduced to 10 feet wide if a wall was proposed. A buffer is not required between abutting uses that are of a different type (i.e. the multi-family uses to the north) when the uses are separated by a street. Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Landscape screening is proposed along the east and north areas of the proposed 15-stall parking lot. A small portion of the landscape area is smaller than 3 feet because the parking stalls were designed so that a portion of the parking space overhangs the same area. To comply with this standard, the applicant will need to revise the site plan to ensure that the minimum landscape island dimension is provided. Section 18.745.050.E.2 states that any services facilities, such as gas meters or air conditioners which, would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. The site plan only indicates that the parking and storage areas will be screened. The plans do not indicate where any service facilities such as gas meters of air conditioners will be located. Therefore, to ensure that this requirement will be met, the applicant will need to show the location and screening proposed for service facilities and how these facilities will be screened. Section 18.745.050.E.4. states that any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's site plan indicates that a refuse collection area will be provided along the north property line. The site plan indicates that the refuse collection area will be screened by a 6-foot-high sight-obscuring chain link fence. The Code only allows screening by the placement of a solid wood, masonry wall or evergreen shrub. Six Yukon Belle Firethorn Pyracanthas bushes are proposed to be located to the west and south sides of the storage area. The east side of this facility abuts the building. A solid wood gate must be provided in order to comply with the standard. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening are satisfied outright or will be met through compliance with the condition of approval. CONDITION:Prior to issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan that shows the location of the service facilities such as the gas meter and air conditioner and demonstrates compliance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. CONDITION:Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan and landscape plan for review and approval. The landscape plan shall show a minimum 3-foot landscape island for the street trees (minus the parking overhang area). The tree at the corner of SW Hall and SW Scoffins Street shall be replaced with a smaller tree and moved to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded. The landscape plan shall note that Maple trees will be pruned to be trees. The site plan shall indicate the type and size of the fence that shall be located and maintained along the west property line. The site plan shall show that the storage collection container gate will be made of solid wood, not chain link with slats as proposed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage — Chapter 18.755: Section 18.755.O1O.B. states that the mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and non-residential construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses. Section 18.755.04O.C.5.b. states that non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet/1,OOO square feet gross floor area (GFA) for "office" and "other" uses. The total square footage of the proposed building is 5,197 square feet. A building this size is required to provide storage of 26.3 square feet (10 + (4 x 5.197) = 30.8). The applicant's site plan indicates that a storage area of approximately 100 square feet will be provided. The Code requires that the gate openings be a minimum of 10 feet wide which is what is proposed. Section 18.755.05O.B. provides the following location standards: To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; The site plan indicates that proposed mixed-use waste collection area is for both waste and recyclable materials. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building (UBC) and Uniform Fire (UFC) requirements; Compliance with UBC and UFC requirements will be addressed at the time of building permits. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; The site plan indicates that a single outdoor location is proposed. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; The site plan indicates that the proposed storage area is not located within a required front yard. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; The proposed storage area is located along SW Scoffins Street. It is visible from the street, but not in a central or visible location for the users. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C., Design Standards; The proposed storage area is along SW Scoffins Street. Both the parking and screening requirements are addressed elsewhere in this decision. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The storage area is along SW Scoffins Street. It is out of the way of on-site vehicular and pedestrian movement. However, the location is such that it would obstruct vehicle movement on SW Scoffins Street and it will need to be moved. Section 18.755.050.C. provides the following design standards: The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection as follows: • Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; • Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; • Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. Section 18.755.050.D. provides the following access standards: • Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; • Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; • Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Compliance with the above design and location standards will be assured through the Franchise Hauler's review and the Building Permit process. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage are met outright or will be satisfied through compliance with the conditions of approval. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a site plan and detailed trash enclosure design drawings to the Franchise Hauler for review and approval. The plans shall be of sufficient detail for the Franchise Hauler to determine that the applicable design and access standards are met. At a minimum, the gate must contain solid wood. Section 18.765.030.B. states that the location of off-street parking will be as follows: • Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); • Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building: The proposed parking lot is within 8 feet of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.765.030.G. states that all parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. State standards require one (1) accessible space for parking lots providing up to 25 parking spaces. The proposed parking lot contains 15 spaces, including one (1) handicapped accessible stall. The standards require that at least one required accessible space be sized and designated "van accessible". This criterion has been already met. Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The proposed parking lot does not address this requirement of a wheel stop. This decision has been conditioned accordingly. Section 18.765.040.N.1. states that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are as follows: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. The proposed development is proposing 15 off-street parking stalls, which meets the requirement for a 5,197 square foot retail space. However, the plans indicate 942 additional square feet are proposed to be used as storage. As the parking requirements are based on gross floor area, the Code would require that 3 additional parking spaces be added to the site. The proposed compact parking space dimensions (8 feet wide by 15 feet long) does not comply with this standard. The plan shows the compact spaces being only 12 feet long with a 3-foot overhang when the requires a minimum length of 16.5 feet. The proposed standard parking space dimensions (9 feet wide by 18 feet) also does not comply with this standard. The plan shows the spaces being 15 feet long, with a 3-foot maximum allowable overhang when the Code requires a minimum length of 18.5 feet. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The proposed parking 2-direction aisle is shown as being 24 feet wide. Therefore, this criterion is met. Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; The site plan indicates that a bicycle parking area will be provided south of the building which is approximately 33 feet from the closest entrance and 93 feet from the furthest entrance. Therefore, this criterion is met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; The site plan indicates that the proposed bicycle parking facility is located on the concrete surface outside the aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Therefore, this criterion is met. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; The site plan indicates that the proposed bicycle parking area is visible from the street and main pedestrian walkway. Therefore, this criterion is met. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle parking area is located outside. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. The applicant's site plan does not indicate that the proposed bicycle parking facility will be covered. Section 18.765.050.C. states that the following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: • The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; • Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; • Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2-1/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; • Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; • Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; • Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. The applicant has not provided sufficient detail on the design of the proposed bicycle parking facility for Staff to make a determination that these standards are met. Section 18.765.050.D.states that outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. As noted above, the site plan indicates that the bicycle parking facility will be located on a concrete surface. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.765.050.E. states that the total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2. in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040., using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. The site plan shows 2 bicycle parking spaces being provided. Table 18.765.2 states that personal services retail uses must provide 1 .0 bicycle parking space per 1 ,000 square feet of floor area. The site plan indicates that the retail floor area will be 5,197 square feet. The bicycle-parking requirement is, therefore, 6 spaces (1.0 x 5.197). If the 942 square foot storage area were retained, then an additional bicycle space would be required for a total of 7 spaces. Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Minimum and Maximum off-street parking is addressed earlier in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading are either met outright or will be satisfied through compliance with the conditions of approval. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a revised vehicle and bicycle-parking plan for review and approval. The plan shall show that the proposed parking space length meets the standard. A detailed bicycle parking design shall be provided showing 6 spaces for a 5,197 square foot building (or 7 spaces for a 6,139 square foot building), which demonstrates compliance with the requirements of Section 8.765.050.C. CONDTION: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall address the parking needs for the 942 square foot storage area by one (1) of the following ways: (a) submit a revised parking plan adding 3 parking spaces; (b) revise the building plans to eliminate the 942 square foot storage area; or (c) obtain a parking reduction to reduce the off-street parking requirement. CONDITION: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site showing a new location for the storage collection facility. Signs — Chapter 18.780: Section 18.780.130.F. states that no signs shall be permitted in an I-P, I-L or I-H zone except for the following: Freestanding signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in industrial zones; The site plan and narrative did not discuss signs. Sign permits are handled separately by the Development Services Technician Staff. Wall Signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in industrial zones: • Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted; • Wall signs may not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached; and SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 27 SCR 99-0003 • If it is determined under the development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted. No copy will be permitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters. A sign permit will be required at the time of development. Therefore, these standards will be satisfied at the time of sign permit. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.79O.O3O.A. states that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Section 18.79O.O3O.B. states that the tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the; Two trees on the site will be removed — a 30-inch pine and a 26-inch fir. The landscape plan indicates that although 56 inches need to be mitigated, only 39 inches are mitigated on-site. Because all the trees over 12 inches will be removed, the total inches removed must be mitigated inch for inch. According to Section 18.790.030 B. 2. of the Tigard Community Development Code, mitigation trees shall be exclusive of trees required by other development provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots. Based on this Code section, it is unknown how many of the replacement trees are eligible to be used as mitigation. Therefore, a tree removal plan and/or in lieu fees will be necessary to ensure that this Code provision has been satisfied. The City's Arborist noted that this project would possibly impact an oak tree located on the southerly adjacent parcel and recommended that an arborist report be provided addressing how the project design would minimize impacting this oak tree. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.79O.O6O.D. in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: • Retention of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program in accordance with Section 18.79O.O60.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retention of from 25% to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.79O.O6O.D.; • Retention of from 50% to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with Section 18.79O.O6O.D.; • Retention of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. This Code section was already addressed above. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; The landscape plan indicates 2 trees will be removed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The landscape indicates that several trees will be retained on the site. However, Staff is unsure if a tree protection plan is needed because the sizes are not noted on the landscape plan. If the trees are less than 12 inches in caliper, a tree protection plan is not required. If the two trees are saved as recommended, then a tree protection plan would be needed. Subsequent removal of a tree: Section 18.790.040.B. states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030. or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Staff is unsure if a deed restriction needs to be recorded because the size of the trees that will be retained is unknown. A deed restriction will be necessary for the trees that are to be retained that are larger than 12 inches in caliper. FINDING: Because the applicant has not indicated how they propose to mitigate for the caliper inches removed, Staff can not confirm that the proposal has met the tree removal and mitigation standards. If the applicant indicates how the mitigation inches will be provided on-site, off-site or by payment with a fee in-lieu, Staff can find that the standards have been met. CONDITION: Indicate how the 56 inches will be mitigated. The plan will need to state if the mitigation will provided on-site, off-site or payment with a fee in-lieu. The proposed mitigation plan must be approved prior to issuance of the building permit; however, actual mitigation is not required to be complete until the occupancy stage. CONDITION:Submit a revised landscape plan indicating the size of the trees that will be retained so Staff can determine if a tree protection plan and deed restriction is needed. At a minimum, an arborist will need to provide a tree protection plan for the 26-inch fir and 30-inch pine. CONDITION:Submit an arborist report indicating what measures will be taken to ensure the oak tree on the adjoining site would not be impacted by this project. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.020.A. states that the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 According to Section 18.795.030A, there are no clear vision requirements for property in the CBD zoning district. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards — Chapter 18.810: Section 18.810.030.A.1. states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 8.810.030.A.2. states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. STREETS: The Tigard Development Code Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. The Tigard Development Code Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. SW Hall Boulevard This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map and is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 90 feet. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant will need to dedicate additional ROW, in accordance with ODOT standards, to bring the width up to 45 feet from centerline. Southwest Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curbing and the site has an existing driveway. ODOT has apparently indicated that the applicant's proposed access location will be approved, provided it is relocated southerly to provide more separation from the intersection at Scoffins Street. If ODOT requires additional improvements along SW Hall Boulevard, then the applicant will need to provide those improvements as a part of the project. SW Scoffins Street Southwest Scoffins Street is classified as a minor collector street on the City's Transportation Plan map, and requires a 60-foot ROW to meet current standards. The intersection of Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard is offset southerly from the intersection of Hunziker/Hall Boulevard. The City's ultimate goal is that this intersection should be reconstructed to eliminate the offset. However, no current plans exist for this work to be done. However, it is believed that the present alignment of SW Scoffins Street adjacent to this site will not be the ultimate location. For this reason, Staff does not believe it would be beneficial to the public to require the applicant to construct street improvements at this time. Rather, it would be more appropriate to require the applicant to enter into a street improvement agreement with the City, whereby they agree to participate in a future project that would include improvements to SW Scoffins Street (TDC 18.810.030.A.4). This agreement, and their future participation, would satisfy the TDC requirements. The applicant's plans show 2 proposed driveways on Scoffins Street that are of great concern to Staff. The driveways are proposed to be located near the western end of the site. One would serve as an access to the trash collection area and the other appears to serve a garage door on the building. The latter access could essentially be used as a loading access, which could result in vehicles or trucks attempting to back into the access from the street. This is not an acceptable access use, especially since Scoffins Street is a minor collector street with significant traffic volumes. In addition, there are sharp curves in the roadway to the west of this site that create a hazardous condition at present. Any cars or trucks entering or exiting the proposed driveways would conflict with eastbound vehicles traveling through the curves. The sight distance through the curves does not appear to be adequate. The City Engineer has the authority to review and approve proposed access locations and loading locations in accordance SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 19 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 with TDC 18.705.030.E and 18.765.080.B(1). Staff considers the proposed driveways to be unsafe and recommends the loading and trash collection areas be moved elsewhere on the site to where they can be accessed via the main driveway on SW Hall Boulevard. WATER: Water service can be provided to this site from the City's public water system. There is an existing water meter that serves this site. SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Scoffins Street that can serve this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will extend a sewer service from the main line over to this site. This work will require a Street Opening Permit from the City. STORM DRAINAGE: This site is relatively flat, but has a slight slope toward the west. There is a partial storm drainage system in SW Scoffins Street, consisting of roadside ditch on the northerly side of the roadway that eventually enters a piped system to the west of this site. The applicant's engineer is proposing to collect the onsite runoff and convey the water into a new public storm drainage pipe in SW Scoffins Street that would be extended westerly in the roadway and discharged into the roadside ditch on the northerly side of the road. The engineer has determined that there is adequate capacity in the downstream system to handle the additional runoff from this site. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines on SW Scoffins Street and along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. The section applies to the frontage of the site from where utility service is provided. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27. 50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines that provide service to the site. The frontages, and resultant fees, along this site are: SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 20 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 SW Scoffins Street: 145 feet Fee = $3,988 SW Hall Boulevard: 140 feet Fee = $3,850 ADDRESS ASSIGNMENTS: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). For parcels within the USB, an addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final plat. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant's proposal does not meet all of the Street Utility and Improvement Standards. If the applicant complies with Conditions 1 through 9 at the beginning of this decision, the standards will be met. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Relationship to the natural and physical environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2.a states that buildings shall be: • Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; • Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; • Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and • Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The site is relatively flat and not subject to ground slumping or sliding. There are no natural drainageways located on the property. The Building Division has reviewed the proposal and provided comments. None of the comments indicate that the building location will impede fire fighting ability or light or circulation. The development is not residential, therefore, the requirement to be oriented with consideration to the sun and wind is not considered applicable. Tree removal and mitigation was previously addressed in this decision. FINDING: Because the building has been located with consideration to the natural environment and trees have been discussed previously in this decision, Staff finds that the relationship to the natural and physical environment standard has been satisfied. Section 18.360.090.A.2.b. states that trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790., Tree Removal. The site plan indicates that 2 large trees will be removed. The trees could have been saved if the building had been designed differently. For example, the building could be located closer to the south and west property lines, it could be a 2-story structure, the square footage could be smaller, the west buffer area could be reduced from 15 feet to 10 feet by the addition of a wall or the building could be designed along SW Hall Boulevard as recommended by Tri- Met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the proposal does not satisfy the Site Development Review criteria relating to preservation of the natural and physical environment. CONDITION:Submit a revised site plan retaining the 2 trees over 26 inches in caliper as noted on the plan. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 21 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a. states that buffering shall be rovided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: The proposal is providing a 15-foot-wide buffer between a retail use and single-family dwellings. This criterion was previously discussed in this decision. Section 18.36O.O9O.A.4.b. states that on site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. Screening of parking areas, services areas and the proposed trash/recycling enclosure has been addressed earlier in this decision under the specific provisions of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.36O.O9O.A.8. states that where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. According to FEMA floodplain information, the site is not located within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because the site does not abut a floodplain, Staff finds that this standard does not apply to this application. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: Section 18.36O.09O.A.9.a. states that the structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and Section 18.36O.O9O.A.9.b. states that areas may be defined by, but not limited to the following: • A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; • A trellis or arbor; • A change in elevation or grade; • A change in the texture of the path material; • Sign; or • Landscaping. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 22 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The site plan indicates that the site is differentiated from the street by landscaping and street trees. The walkway approaches to the building entrances provide a clear corridor for visitors and clients who need to gain access to the building. The landscaping and walkways ensure there is a transition from public to private property. Therefore, this standard is met. Crime prevention and safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10.a. states that windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; The elevation drawings indicate that 3 elevations are provided with windows. No windows are located along the west elevation where the storage facility is proposed. Section 18.360.090.A.10.d. states that the exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and Section 18.360.090.A.10.e. states that light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has not submitted information regarding lighting levels. The Tigard Police Department commented on this proposal and requested a lighting plan for their review and approval. A condition of approval requires that the applicant submit a lighting plan that complies with this section. Therefore, this standard will be satisfied through compliance with the condition of approval. FINDING: If the applicant provides a lighting plan, this criterion would be met. CONDITION:Submit a lighting plan for review and approval by the Tigard Police Department. Public transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11.a. states that provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; Section 18.360.090.A.11.b.(1) & (2) state that the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on the following: • The location of other transit facilities in the area; and • The size and type of the proposal. Tri-Met was asked to address this issue. Tri-Met Staff recommends that the building be oriented closer to SW Hall Boulevard to encourage direct pedestrian access to the bus line located on SW Hall Boulevard. FINDING: Because Tri-Met recommends that the building be placed along SW Hall Boulevard to encourage pedestrian use, Staff has conditioned the application accordingly. CONDITION:The applicant shall take Tri- Met's recommendation into consideration to place the building along SW Hall Boulevard when revising the project to comply with the various Code requirements. Landscaping: Section 18.360.090.A.12.a. states that all landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. as follows: • A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The project will provide 24% of the site in landscaping. Therefore, this standard is met. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 23 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Section 18.360.090.A.13. states that all drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Storm drainage is addressed earlier in this decision under Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Section 18.360.090.A.14. states that provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and Accessibility of parking stalls is addressed earlier in this decision. Accessibility of walkways and structures will be addressed through the building permit process. Therefore, this standard is met. Section 18.360.090.A.15. states that all of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. No variance or adjustment is being requested. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and has offered the following comments: Drainage plans indicate manholes in the parking area and the Code requires catchbasins; Under provisions of the Tualatin Unified Fire District Ordinance, 2 hydrants will be required. Hydrants located on the opposite side of the street can not be used in calculating this requirement. STAFF RESPONSE: Comments submitted by the Building Division were made a condition of approval. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed this application and has offered no comments or objections. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and has requested that the applicant submit a lighting plan for the project. STAFF REPSONSE: Comments submitted by the Police Department were included in the conditions of approval. The City of Tigard Operations Department was given the opportunity to review the proposal and submit comments and offered no comments or objections. No other comments were received. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Tri-Met provided the following comments concerning this proposal: Tri-Met welcomes the opportunity to comment on this proposal for construction of A Superior Signs store at SW Hall Boulevard and SW Scoffins Street. This area is served by Tri-Met Line 78 on SW Hall Boulevard. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 24 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 The purpose of our recommendations is to minimize the traffic impacts of new development by encouraging developing patterns that are transit, bicycle, and pedestrian supportive. Improved pedestrian access and connection promotes walking and reduces local dependence on automobiles. TRI-MET STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Orient the building towards the primary pedestrian network by moving it closer to Hall Boulevard. With Hall Boulevard being a transit corridor, emphasis should be placed on the pedestrian environment. Buildings are one of the strongest site design elements that can be used to support the pedestrian network. A building located close to the primary sidewalk increases pedestrian acknowledgement, provides direct, unimpeded access, and increases the legibility of the entire pedestrian network. In addition, proper building placement improves pedestrian safety by reducing the number of cross-traffic conflicts. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Kiser at 503-239-2102. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant will need to re-design the project to address various requirements. The City recommends that the applicant take into consideration Tri-Met's comments. Oregon Department of Transportation Staff, Marah Danielson provided the following comments: The proposed development is adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard. According to the Oregon Highway Plan, SW Hall Boulevard has a District level of importance and we have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact safe and efficient use of this facility. We have reviewed the proposed site plan and have the following comments: 1 . ODOT permits are required for access, all work in the State right-of-way, and connection to the State drainage system. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for permit application information. 2. The applicant is required to shift the proposed access to SW Hall Blvd. to their south property line to increase the distance from the SW Scoffins Street intersection and reduce potential vehicle conflict points in the vicinity of the highway intersection. 3. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage will be according to ODOT and ADA current standards. 4. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition of the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit peak runoff rate. The allowable peak runoff rate is based on predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. If you have questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 503-731-8258. Please forward a copy of the decision with conditions of approval when rendered on this case. STAFF COMMENTS: The conditions of approval reflect these comments. TCI Cable was given the opportunity to review the proposal. TCI returned the project proposal, but offered no comments. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R), NW Natural Gas and General Telephone (GTE) were given the opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 25 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) was given the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. No other comments were received. SECTION VII. NEIGHBOR COMMENTS Two letters concerning the proposed project were received from surrounding property owners. Craig and Carrie Prunty, who own the properties at 12645 SW Hall and 8725 SW Commercial, wrote a letter stating the following: We look forward to seeing improved buildings in the area. We hope the City approves. Gail V. Snyder wrote the second letter that stated as follows: As legal owner of 3 residences and properties (Tax Lots 201, 202, and 203) located and adjacent to the west of the above property, I am concerned about preparations and planning for separating the 2 property use types: Commercial: (Applicant) and Residential: (My properties). It is appropriate that some kind of permanent sound and visual barrier is established by the developer of the subject property to avoid intermingling and providing the necessary safety and privacy issues with separating each activity. I request that a six foot high aesthetically pleasing concrete or block wall be provided by the developer on the common property line between our properties to separate these uses as a requirement for development by the City of Tigard. I will be happy to provide other information or appear in person to discuss the merits of this requirement, if requested. Please advise what action the City of Tigard is taking to satisfy this requirement. I apologize I was unable to deliver this in a more timely fashion having just returned from a business trip to receive your notice. Please accept this response into your planning process, as a genuine and timely request. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 26 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 STAFF RESPONSE: The Staff report discussed the various options required by the Tigard Community Development for screening the proposed retail use from the adjoining residences. The City is requiring the applicant to redesign the project so he may wish to consider a wall along the west property line which would reduce the screening width requirement from 20 feet to 10 feet. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: © The applicant and owners © Owner of record within the required distance © Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON APRIL 22, 1999 AND EFFECTIVE ON MAY 7, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON MAY 6, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . April 22, 1999 PREPARED BY: Doris Michael DATE Associate Planner 2 April 22. 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manage i:\curpin\doris\sdr\SDRr99-03superior signsDEC,doc SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 27 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 0 0 t.,.. U S.W. SCOFFINS ST. •—. ..o.... _ F.M Ac. b.W a Ma Cr W Z y� 's�-` � a'+tr <SI"; 41.,;.>.'f,, qr N �, a I j V�',ft'elt.::.,,J,.,",;-:.i.,,,i.:-�� .uwstt 'j '�#,,i � r $} G�a� 'k.x�`°t ?/ ,j'ASyc'�d}�; . 1 I y." ,'s i�ie F `, TMe. ids}..! ..ti� i a•ak� ^.�?: .fu I - • I .i. _... I �:} � ,, `..,„,,iTfh A °,„..v"{� r Ya}, ,, ; C FZ I EOMC.WkaC .� I l , c,` � , { ? Y � 't k” X, y� a . ' { o`r�o [ G-1 h . TO s" b t b 1 Y A L 4 1 - I f 1 1 � ka t i. •a, �. "iiih,r 1 1 a I sar ,}`r �, ?t'I'Z 4 ,:`',"3 't }",�,(I C* `"a ' y-, , ,i'''.' X14 �` �'S).F7' �t(044: ; .' * PARKING J t , F q•} 'ai �f to .F.-,,,.:.,.-E �M r'"�`'' fd1 51 I J _ itIC •� s � a k, i: ft.'''.t'!'r Z J IL 7 li ; N• i vLf lW _ Q IX K Q Atm CD :§ '4W I A -4 -wird" I 1.-- U. �. '� � PARKING / a1/2w.:.; a i ,,,.....43.4 .„ //,t_,,„-"°.....7/N,< iritik7.0 4 q PROJECT DATA viv'`�+�►. '� /�� 2o.M0 CIO I�? OGGIrANGT K . p4/91 COWS TRUC TION TYRE Yid , �/,`� BlA-DMO FE7OHT t .TORT 1 1.x-0` ow �rr�� S.4 DK] AREA {FAST FLA/ S,A7 SF .s-�•tea.c..d. w.r A.C.►AVSIO AREA SAM SF. cos G. WALL AREA US If LA CSCAK AREA 1.T7S Sl.W./0 STE AREA 14.71 .l. MOD FARKNO ., R... IR I WACO 'AMMO PRO Y €D U WM= SITE PLAN T SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING EXHIBIT MAP N SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SO0199-0003 (map is not to scale) kimmliF � � ��- .......' r CITY of TIGARD lir GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM .0, r 1 if If • '° " PL VICINITY MAP 10 sc p s, MR 99-0003 m_=IN , kN°�� ti �� SUPERIOR tic � 1 ° till' I■ ti su BUS ILDING • 1/4„ ,,"---L PARCEL 44 tit Ir. sA s , k#4, • N 44" ",(J'� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 4l kr\ "y�i A re 300 feet i 44 -.. 71 City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and \ should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd kihk Tigard,OR 97223 • L (503)SW Hall http:J/www.Gi.tiaard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Mar 25, 1999:C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 3bit 99-O003 diz-<2e2eA-Lo-Z-, /di 6,4 .3 EXHIBIll 8 2S10100-00500 2S10100-00600 GAZELEY H WILLIAM COLUMBIA HARDWOOD MOULDING PO BOX 230414 PO BOX 23365 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-00800 2S101BC-00900 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-01000 2S101BC-01100 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A NITSOS STEVE T 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-01200 2S101BC-01500 WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12390 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-01600 2S101BC-01700 DALTON LOIS DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& 12420 SW KNOLL DR 4900 SW MEADOWS RD#100 TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101BC-01800 2S101BC-01801 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL L& LUDDERS LIVING TRUST THE 12490 SW KNOLL DR 1301 E FULTON TIGARD,OR 97223 NEWBERG,OR 97132 2S101BC-01900 2S101BC-02200 SOLIS MANUEL AND DIOEMA H H O&B ASSOCIATES 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD PO BOX 23755 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S101BC-02201 2S101BC-02202 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S LEACH DOUGLAS 956 WEST POINT RD 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BC-02300 2S101BC-02401 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L KING JAMES F 12530 SW HALL BLVD 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-03000 2S101BC-03100 BOYD SCOTT NGUYEN VUONG P& 12361 SW KNOLL DR 12387 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 0 3 25101BC-03200 2S101BC-03300 PASSMORE SUSAN E KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7501 SW 195TH PL 7510 SW ASHFORD ST ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AA-00901 2S102AA-03000 ALBERTSON'S INC#6518 PIETILA ELVA E TRUSTEE PO BOX 20 8730 SW SCOFFINS BOISE, ID 83726 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03100 2S102AA-03301 AMERICAN LEGION THE GREENVIEW INVESTMENTS INC PO BOX 23482 5229 SE HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97267 2S102AA-03400 2S102AA-03500 HODGES MERRILL E&CHARLOTTE BUMP RONALD E&JO ANN K 40 OLD STARK RD PO BOX 1652 PORT LUDLOW,WA 98365 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102AA-03701 2S102AA-03800 TIGARD MANOR APARTMENTS LLC PADDACK RYCHEN M/A LUELLA 10222 SE CRESTHILL 11025 SW SUMMER LAKE DR PORTLAND,OR 97266 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03801 2S102AA-03802 ANDREWS JAMES DAROLD FENWICK EDWIN T 21835 SW 70TH AVE 180 MEADOW LANE TUALATIN,OR 97062 GRANTS PASS,OR 97526 2S102AA-03902 2S102AD-00100 DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L MAYEAUX JACK J&SALLY 8915 SW COMMERCIAL ST 12525 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00201 2S102AD-002 SNYDER GAIL V SNYDE AIL V 14460 SW 141ST 144 SW 141ST TIGARD,OR 97224 .T GARD,OR 97224 2S102AD-002 2S102AD-00300 SNYDE IL V HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOC INC 14 SW 141ST 12555 SW HALL BLVD IGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00400 2S102AD-00400 THOMPSON J RONALD& THOMPS RONALD& 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 8610 SCOFFINS#26 TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 97223 � ,. 99 Oa.3 2S102AD-00401 2S102AD-00600 THOMPSON J RONALD&CECILIA PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE A 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 12645 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00700 2S102AD-00800 EHRENFELT TRACEY S& PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE 12665 SW HALL BLVD 8575 SW SORRENTO TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S 102AD-00900 2S 102AD-01100 BOOKOUT JOHN R&FANNY P BIRKEMEIER BRENT T AND 10459 NW LOST PARK DR 10573 SW NAEVE ST PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 102AD-01203 HUMPHRIES RICHARD B AND MICHAEL CANDIANIDES PO BOX 230626 7235 SW BONITA ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARAH DANIELSON, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER REGION 1 123 NW FLANDERS PORTLAND OR 97209-4037 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community rDeveropment ShapingA Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Vivian L.Nimmo, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist Ifor the City o (Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(6)Beim) El NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: SR 00-0003/SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING I DIIE 4/8/08 (Type/Kind of Not,ce) (File No./Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council 1 I NOTICE OF DECISION FOR:. ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director I I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: :17' I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council I NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: . I CI AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Healing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council A copy of the NOTICE OF PENDING APPLICATION/PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit"A",was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",on the 25 day of March ,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 25 day of March , 1999, postage prepaid. ..---7:4,;ZI‘-/(_, , ./f..77 -17-2.-- (Person that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ° day of ra , 19 oFrtir„- .. ■ l 1 1/4 DIANE M JELDENK� NOTARY PUBLIC OF O CON �"- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Ig ;ry NO 046142 �� "`� C°""M "'.:,;;T R 07 19991 My Commission Expires: 7 9y MY COMMISSION EXPi:`, .: NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHC :R,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER, NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Cor mlun tO T G(AoRDc,t Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 25, 1999 EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL: SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 99-0003 This is a request for Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON THURSDAY — APRIL 8. 1999. All comments should be directed to Doris Michael. Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14-DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS 1TAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DI FOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." -� C;TV of TIGARD ��� is e.o•....,e •■STEM • -II N PL VICINITY MAP 4e# I osi s� �°�-� MR 99-0003 s s m „Ativi,„ 044 �ti °��� • Alkt41 SUPERIOR �� ♦ SIGNS 4 B UILDING 411'4' PARCEL 00,#14 ,ie • N {1‘ • e 90 �144°/1 G�ti o �ly,E iI1 �9"7 Cir of Tigard h. Inform•Ian on Ito m•p 1•o general loutwn Dory•nd •noub W venM1ad wtn m•0•nlopmenl Senrices Dnsan 13 SW Hall 1 Tp•rd,OR 97223 (50 Mq:/raw«.0 tq•rder • r...now"OW 11Mi.Inrwn.M Plot date'Mar 25.1999:C•\maaic\MAGIC03.APR __. Zc � 7 off` 2S10100-00500 2S10100-00600 yyVi �7+ GAZELEY H WILLIAM COLUMBIA HARDWOOD MOULDING EXHIIBI 1 B PO BOX 230414 PO BOX 23365 TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-00800 2S101BC-00900 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101BC-01000 2S101BC-01100 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A NITSOS STEVE T 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-01200 2S101BC-01500 WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12390 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-01600 2S101BC-01700 DALTON LOIS DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& 12420 SW KNOLL DR 4900 SW MEADOWS RD#100 TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101BC-01800 2S101BC-01801 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL L& LUDDERS LIVING TRUST THE 12490 SW KNOLL DR 1301 E FULTON TIGARD,OR 97223 NEWBERG,OR 97132 2S101BC-01900 2S101BC-02200 SOLIS MANUEL AND DIOEMA H H 0&B ASSOCIATES 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD PO BOX 23755 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S101BC-02201 2S101BC-02202 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S LEACH DOUGLAS 956 WEST POINT RD 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BC-02300 2S101BC-02401 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L KING JAMES F 12530 SW HALL BLVD 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101BC-03000 2S101BC-03100 BOYD SCOTT NGUYEN VUONG P& 12361 SW KNOLL DR 12387 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 S1i 9 3 -. 4- -. 2S101BC-03200 2S101BC-03300 PASSMORE SUSAN E KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7501 SW 195TH PL 7510 SW ASHFORD ST ALOHA, OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AA-00901 2S102AA-03000 ALBERTSON'S INC#6518 PIETILA ELVA E TRUSTEE PO BOX 20 8730 SW SCOFFINS BOISE, ID 83726 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03100 2S102AA-03301 AMERICAN LEGION THE GREENVIEW INVESTMENTS INC PO BOX 23482 5229 SE HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97267 2S102AA-03400 2S102AA-03500 HODGES MERRILL E&CHARLOTTE BUMP RONALD E&JO ANN K 40 OLD STARK RD PO BOX 1652 PORT LUDLOW,WA 98365 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102AA-03701 2S102AA-03800 TIGARD MANOR APARTMENTS LLC PADDACK RYCHEN M/A LUELLA 10222 SE CRESTHILL 11025 SW SUMMER LAKE DR PORTLAND,OR 97266 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03801 2S102AA-03802 ANDREWS JAMES DAROLD FENWICK EDWIN T 21835 SW 70TH AVE 180 MEADOW LANE TUALATIN, OR 97062 GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 2S102AA-03902 2S102AD-00100 DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L MAYEAUX JACK J&SALLY 8915 SW COMMERCIAL ST 12525 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102AD-00201 2S 102AD-00202 SNYDER GAIL V SNYDE AIL V 14460 SW 141ST 144 SW 141ST TIGARD,OR 97224 T GARD,OR 97224 2S102AD-0020 ' 2S102AD-00300 SNYDE IL V HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOC INC 14 SW 141ST 12555 SW HALL BLVD IGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00400 2S102AD-00400 THOMPSON J RONALD& THOMPS RONALD& 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 8610 SCOFFINS#26 TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 97223 s64 sc 2S 102AD-00401 2S 102AD-00600 THOMPSON J RONALD&CECILIA PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE A 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 12645 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00700 2S102AD-00800 EHRENFELT TRACEY S& PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE 12665 SW HALL BLVD 8575 SW SORRENTO TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S102AD-00900 2S102AD-01100 BOOKOUT JOHN R&FANNY P BIRKEMEIER BRENT T AND 10459 NW LOST PARK DR 10573 SW NAEVE ST PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AD 01203 MICHAEL CANDIANIDES HUMPHRIES RICHARD B AND PO BOX 230626 7235 SW BONITA ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 ll - _ iwllqpP CITY of TIGARD ,,,�. ' \ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I ��,•P ��, NM NOTIFICATION it .t.• AREA , ‘ *ids' � (500') s m , ,2s1 o'..901 25102AAe3 1 ,• 2S102411031110-1' 5,0241103100 x,01 ktSa spit 99-0003 .0.°6. > �� \ 3902 _ I '026 0/8003,00\ , ti ♦ 2S102W l 2S102AAD3 :�I I I I i �NP 2S102AAU30W I 410101 _ I 1 251016001500 � C / S10 81 'Q, .._—. ' 2 10.101 i r 32x0-� i 'SIT S , ' t0 . 0.802 25101..1)113'1 f, i0 5101�O.y1r600 3701 2S102AA03500�C, 2S10t6C01�ot h00 10?�11 :I�1 I j �� 2S1016C0 iiii*.� 23,°2111,11 ,i , 2S,o SUPERIOR 2s10 411l� 1R 1 ":;' . 2st°21390 2oz 4._ 251016002300 • 2S10 .1 I L•I■2,,,1 140 1024000300 / ..: e. „.G, ,,,, \ ,\1 25,e,BC0 200 SIGHS s� 25,0,1 1 2e 102 111:11 1 25,°2 202,0 Is°° BUILDING 2S101 BCO2i1,po-v 2S101D000500\ . A . \2S101. II N 0 100 200 300 400 Feel 1"=300 feet A / City of Tigard • - Information on this map is for general location only and should be yenned with the Development Services Division. . 13125 SW Hall Blvd P Tigard,OR 97223 '_ ' J (503)839171 .■ m http:lMwwti.tignd.or.us Community Development Plot date. Mar 25, 1999;C:'rnagic MAGIC03.APR .y • 2510100-00500 2510100-00600 GAZELEY H WILLIAM COLUMBIA HARDWOOD MOULDING PO BOX 230414 PO BOX 23365 TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-00800 2S101BC-00900 CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A CLICKENER ROBERT R&PATRICIA A 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101BC-01000 2S101BC-01100 CLICKENER ROBERT R& PATRICIA A NITSOS STEVE T 13855 SW PACIFIC HWY 8465 SW HUNZIKER RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S 101 BC-01200 2S 101 BC-01500 WILDER GEORGE C&LUCETTE A WILLIAMS PORTUS W AND SARAH T 8445 SW HUNZIKER ST 12390 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101BC-01600 2S101BC-01700 DALTON LOIS DEFOE JUDITH A MCGEE& 12420 SW KNOLL DR 4900 SW MEADOWS RD#100 TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S101BC-01800 2S101BC-01801 BEAUDOIN MICHAEL L& LUDDERS LIVING TRUST THE 12490 SW KNOLL DR 1301 E FULTON TIGARD,OR 97223 NEWBERG, OR 97132 2S101BC-01900 2S101BC-02200 SOLIS MANUEL AND DIOEMA H H 0& B ASSOCIATES 8335 SW HUNZIKER RD PO BOX 23755 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S101BC-02201 2S101BC-02202 ROACH MICHAEL A AND PAMELA S LEACH DOUGLAS 956 WEST POINT RD 8430 SW HUNZIKER RD STE 200 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S101BC-02300 2S101BC-02401 MCCARTHY KELLY E&JANICE L KING JAMES F 12530 SW HALL BLVD 12650 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S101BC-03000 2S101BC-03100 BOYD SCOTT NGUYEN VUONG P& 12361 SW KNOLL DR 12387 SW KNOLL DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101BC-03200 2S101BC-03300 PASSMORE SUSAN E KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7501 SW 195TH PL 7510 SW ASHFORD ST ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AA-00901 2S102AA-03000 ALBERTSON'S INC#6518 PIETILA ELVA E TRUSTEE PO BOX 20 8730 SW SCOFFINS BOISE, ID 83726 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03100 2S102AA-03301 AMERICAN LEGION THE GREENVIEW INVESTMENTS INC PO BOX 23482 5229 SE HILL RD TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97267 2S102AA-03400 2S102AA-03500 HODGES MERRILL E&CHARLOTTE BUMP RONALD E&JO ANN K 40 OLD STARK RD PO BOX 1652 PORT LUDLOW,WA 98365 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102AA-03701 2S102AA-03800 TIGARD MANOR APARTMENTS LLC PADDACK RYCHEN M/A LUELLA 10222 SE CRESTHILL 11025 SW SUMMER LAKE DR PORTLAND, OR 97266 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AA-03801 2S102AA-03802 ANDREWS JAMES DAROLD FENWICK EDWIN T 21835 SW 70TH AVE 180 MEADOW LANE TUALATIN,OR 97062 GRANTS PASS,OR 97526 2S102AA-03902 2S102AD-00100 DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L MAYEAUX JACK J&SALLY 8915 SW COMMERCIAL ST 12525 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102AD-00201 2S102AD-002027 SNYDER GAIL V SNYDER GAIL V 14460 SW 141ST 144 D-SW 141ST TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 97224 2S102AD-00203 2S102AD-00300 SNYDER L V HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOC INC 1446 141ST 12555 SW HALL BLVD T ARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00400 2S102AD-00400 THOMPSON J RONALD& THOMPSO RONALD& 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 8610 SCOFFINS#26 TIGARD,OR 97223 ItdARD,OR 97223 1' 2S 102AD-00401 2S 102AD-00600 THOMPSON J RONALD&CECILIA PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE A 8610 SW SCOFFINS#26 12645 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD-00700 2S102AD-00800 EHRENFELT TRACEY S& PRUNTY CRAIG E&CARRIE 12665 SW HALL BLVD 8575 SW SORRENTO TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S102AD-00900 2S102AD-01100 BOOKOUT JOHN R&FANNY P BIRKEMEIER BRENT T AND 10459 NW LOST PARK DR 10573 SW NAEVE ST PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 102AD-01203 HUMPHRIES RICHARD B AND MICHAEL CANDIANIDES PO BOX 230626 7235 SW BONITA ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 APPLICANT MATERIALS . . 4 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE APP. HELD WITH: U DATE OF PRE-APP.: + - Property Address/Location(s): /•2-. S• ct, 1- 141.4. SC,v) i C' C2R FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): ,2_510.2 A D 00/00 Case No.(s): &-ijik l Other Case No.(s): — Site Size: 1`,k27_C9C249 Receipt No.: `" -n1 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: J�QC.k I eli u Application Accepted Bit: 1` , �/ Date: Address: / 5.25 S.G1.1. KA4-&Lv Phone: �.Z03613b City: GP RD Zip: 9 -24 Applicant*: yVll(1`/A£L CAN D 1►4N 1,D>ES Date Determined To Be Complete: Address: 7,2_35 5.1,J• 80,41x4 RY1 Phone: x 39515 1 -/ 1 Cit y 77 G/4 RD !�(. 9 3.2-244 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: �. Zip: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Rev.8/29/96 is\curpin masters sdra.doc must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. f PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request Site ✓ pplication Elements Submitted: Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): Application Form d"6 SOHO cgim 1/4407-"" S/ Le d Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Title Transfer Instrument or Deed �- S 7% ,Oif off, Site/Plot Plan �d B.Z. l/r � (#of copies based on pre-app check list) S /pEr2/O/2_ S/CA/S �O. Qf Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/,"x 11") Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) 2' Construction Cost Estimate Filing Fee (Under$100000) $�8OQ ($100,000 4999,99 $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over)` —$4;780.00 (+$51$10,000) 1 - . List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as, part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) • THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property, • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this �Z day of , 19 2. Ow er's ur Sign e Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 I //\, CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 7/20/99 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR] 99-0003 FILE TITLE: SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING APPLICANT: Michael Candianides OWNER: Jack Mayeaux 7235 SW Bonita Road 12525 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 639-5151 (503) 620-3686 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct a one-story, 5,197 square foot building. LOCATION: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 00100. ZONE: Central Business District; CBD. The purpose of the Central Business District zoning district is to establish sites for civic, retail and office uses centered in the city's historic downtown. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 18.795 and 18.800. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS SENT: March 25,1999 DUE: THURSDAY-4/8/99 X STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: [TENTATIVELY) APRIL 14,1999 HEARINGS OFFICER IMONJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION [MON] DATE OF HEARING: _ TIME:1:30PM CITY COUNCIL 1TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: TIME:1:30 PM [-COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY —TREE PLAN OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Doris Michael, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 SDR 99-0003 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PROPOSAL I , March 8, 1999 Ala •> CITY OF TIGARD Michael Candianides OREGON 7235 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 RE: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; SDR 99-0003 Dear Mr. Candianides: Thank you for submitting a site development review application for the retail sign building proposed at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, in the CBD Zone in Tigard. Our office has reviewed the application materials and determined that it is incomplete. Before the application can be processed, the following information needs to be provided or clarified: 1 . Submit self-stamped and self-addressed envelopes that are required for the 500- foot public notice mailing area. Be sure to show a map indicating the properties that are being notified and a listing of those properties in 1" x 4" label format. 2. Submit a map showing the existing features on the site, including the structures, vegetation, street improvements, paving, etc. 3. Submit a tree removal plan. 4. Submit a landscape plan. Please show where the 15 percent landscaping requirement will be provided. 5. The proposed site plan needs to include dimensions so that staff can be sure the project will meet city standards (setbacks, parking, driveway widths, etc.). Please show the surrounding land uses and driveway locations. Also, show where any easement(s) may be located on the site. Where will the mailbox be located? 6. Show where the bike parking will be located. 7. Submit a grading plan. 8. Submit a traffic study for City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) review. ODOT will need to review and approve any proposed access onto SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT will likely deny access and require access from SW Scoffins Street. Brian Rager in our Engineering Department said that SW Scoffins Street is not safe now and the traffic study should look at site distance issues. 9. Submit a copy of the preliminary development review notes. 10. Are any lights proposed in the parking lot? If so, where? 11. Address the city's clear vision requirements to ensure that people can safely turn into SW Scoffins Street or SW Hall Boulevard. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Page 1 of 2 A • 12. Submit the notes from the neighborhood meeting held so that we know what issues were raised, accompanied by the necessary sign-in sheet(s) and affidavits of mailing and posting the notice. Please review the Tigard Community Development Code to see what standards must be met when developing land in the city. Because of land use laws, projects without adequate submittals and findings can be denied. Complete submittals help to ensure approval. A copy of the City of Tigard's Community Development Code is available on the Internet at www.ci.tigard.or.us\cd\toc\htm. Hard copies are also available for purchase at our office or for viewing at the library. Should you need any assistance, please call me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Doris Michael, Associate Planner is\curpin\doris\sdrlsdr99-0003incomplete.doc c: Jack Mayeaux, 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97224 SDR 99-0003 land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file 3/8/99 Michael Candianides Page 2 of 2 Re: SDR 99-0003 Incompleteness Ltr. March 8, 1999 ma CITY OF TIGARD Michael Candianides OREGON 7235 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 RE: 12525 SW Hall Boulevard; SDR 99-0003 Dear Mr. Candianides: Thank you for submitting a site development review application for the retail sign building proposed at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, in the CBD Zone in Tigard. Our office has reviewed the application materials and determined that it is incomplete. Before the application can be processed, the following information needs to be provided or clarified: 1. Submit self-stamped and self-addressed envelopes that are required for the 500- foot public notice mailing area. Be sure to show a map indicating the properties that are being notified and a listing of those properties in 1" x 4" label format. 2. Submit a map showing the existing features on the site, including the structures, vegetation, street improvements, paving, etc. 3. Submit a tree removal plan. 4. Submit a landscape plan. Please show where the 15 percent landscaping requirement will be provided. Pr '''k` ci-de'n' --- 5. The proposed site plan needs to include dimensions so that staff can be sure the project will meet city standards (setbacks, parking, driveway widths, etc.). Please show the surrounding land uses and driveway locations. Also, show where any easement(s) may be located on the site. Where will the mailbox be located? 6. Show where the bike parking will be located. 7. Submit a grading plan. 8. Submit a traffic study for City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) review. ODOT will need to review and approve any proposed access onto SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT will likely deny access and require access from SW Scoffins Street. Brian Rager in our Engineering Department said that SW Scoffins Street is not safe now and the traffic study should look at site distance issues. 9. Submit a copy of the preliminary development review notes. 10. Are any lights •roposed in the parking lot? If so, where? 11. A.•ress e cit ' mar vision 1-equir ents to e ure at pe. : - - • safel n int. S Scoffins treet o 'SW Hall Bo v . • E 1A) C.BO " 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 Page 1 of 2 12. Submit the notes from the neighborhood meeting held so that we know what issues were raised, accompanied by the necessary sign-in sheet(s) and affidavits of mailing and posting the notice. Please review the Tigard Community Development Code to see what standards must be met when developing land in the city. Because of land use laws, projects without adequate submittals and findings can be denied. Complete submittals help to ensure approval. A copy of the City of Tigard's Community Development Code is available on the Internet at www.ci.tigard.or.us\cd\toc\htm. Hard copies are also available for purchase at our office or for viewing at the library. Should you need any assistance, please call me at (503) 639-4171 x317. Sincerely, Doris Michael, Associate Planner i:\curpin\doris\sdrlsdr99-0003incomplete.doc c: Jack Mayeaux, 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97224 SDR 99-0003 land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file 3/8/99 Michael Candianides Page 2 of 2 Re: SDR 99-0003 Incompleteness Ltr. CITY OF TIGARD OREGON March 24, 1999 Michael Candianides 7235 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal — SDR 99-0003 Proposed Superior Sign Building at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard Dear Mr. Candianides: Thank you for submitting the Site Development Review application for the proposed Superior Sign building at 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, located in the Central Business District Zone. Our office has reviewed the information you submitted and determined the application to be complete as of 3/23/99. We can now continue processing the application. Should you have any questions, please call me at your earliest convenience at 503-639-4171 x317. Thank you for being so thorough and so prompt! S' rcerely, GItZ 7c�Q� , • Doris Michael Associate Planner i:\curpin\doris\sdr\sdr99-3superiorsigncomplete.doc c: SDR 99-0003 land use file Jack Mayeaux, 12525 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97224 1999 Planning correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY February 24, 1999 Superior Sign Design Review Narrative 18.360 The new Superior Sign building is designed as a 5,197 square foot up-scale commercial building with a provision for storage on the second level. . The new superior sign building as shown on the attached elevation drawing will provide a commercial building design that will up lift and enhance the appearance of the area located at Hall Blvd and Scoffins Street. This new building will use natural materials such as natural colored masonry and a roof system that is architecturally pleasing with The City of Tigard's creative design. 18.520 The proposed new facility is located in a CBD zoned district. This retail sign business is a permitted use in this district. The low volume nature of this retail business lends it self to this location. 18.705 The access, egress at this site is controlled by ODOT, a separate permit is required to allow access on to Hall Blvd. The preliminary response from ODOT is to allow the assess on to Hall Blvd,. with one modification requiring the existing access be relocated to the south allowing more distance from the intersection of Hall Blvd. and Scofffins Street. 18.730 The set back required per code is 20' on the west side of the building. We are proposing a 15' set back on the rear side of the building to include a landscape design that will buffer the new proposed building from the rear property. With this irregular shape site the 15' set back will allow a more efficient use of the site. 18.745 As stated in 18730 we will be providing additional landscaping to buffer the rear of the building from the property to the west. The overall landscaping solution as drawn on Al is showing 3,602 square feet of landscaped area equaling 24.4%. 18.755 As shown on site plan Al we have provided adequate area for the trash and recyclables. This area is accessible for the haulers from Soffins Street. 18.765 The parking solution is located on site for this facility. We have provided 15 spaces as required by code. 18.790 With the required parking and water quality requirements, this site is not large enough to allow for any of the existing trees to remain. This new facility will provide overall, a greater landscaped area then is required per code, see attached landscape drawing L1,L2. 18.795 As shown on the site plan Al the new building is set back on the site with the parking on the front side close to Hall Blvd, allowing for open line of site from Soffins Street and Hall Blvd., 18.810 The street standards on Hall Blvd are per ODOT standards, All utilities, sanitary and storm will conform to applicable standard construction specifications of the City of Tigard. /1 February 26, 1999 SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY City of Tigard Design Review- Superior Sign Construction estimate. The estimated cost for the new proposed Superior Sign building located at the corner of SW Hall Blvd. and SW Scoffins Street is $339,000.00. Thank You, SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 7235 SW Bonita Road•Tigard,OR 97224 CCB #32944 • PO Box 231026•Portland,OR 97281 SabreConst@AOLcom Phone 503/639-5151 Fax 503/620-6005 r.,. .., _ HrFLIUN I RAT Hluu rtnwu I I v 7r PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCT APPROACH RO la AA3549t7 . ENGINEERS STATION 1 HIGHWAY NAME MILE POINT Beaverton Tualatin Highway 5.29 117+00 HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY SIDE OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE NORTH ❑EAST ■ 141 , Washington Retail Shop . l SOU BETWEEN OR NEAR REFERENCE MAP NUMBERS TAX LOT NUMBER South of Scoffin road 27V-26 Sheet 4A 00100 APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REQUIRED REFERENCE AMOUNT OF BOND YES❑NO OAR 734-50-025(61 2r 000.OQ Brent His/op INSURANCE REQUIRED REFERENCE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE - 11705 SW Pacific Hwy YES NO OAR 734-50-025131 El TEMPORARY DEPOSIT Tigard OR 97224 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER 50.00 DISTRICT MA GER OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE APPLICATION APPROVED TELEPHONE NUMBER: 598-0839 X // - 2---17—c APP ANT 'APPLICATION DATE APPROACH ROAD COMP 0 y! 3 ,//- c2, REFERENCE:OAR 7 0-050!41 9-10-99 X The ap cant declarl6 that he/she Is the owner or lessee of the real property adjoining the above described highway and has the lawful authority to apply for this permit. When this application Is approved by the Department of Transportation,the applicant is subject to the terms and provisions contained herein and attached hereto,,and the terms of Oregon Administrative Rule,Chapter 734,Division 50,which Is by this reference made a part of this permit.Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Manager's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations Is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowledged comprehensive plan for the area.Permits are issued subject to the approval of city,county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of zoning and/or building regulations.It shag be the applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approval Including,where appicable,local government determination of compliance with the statewide planning goals. (OAR 734-50-0551 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1---If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and/or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. The original application must be signed by the local government official. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL SIGNATURE TITLE DATE X - - 1 2---Within 48 hours before beginning work and after completing the permit work, the applicant or his contractor shall notify the District Representative at telephone number: 503-229-5002 x225 Or FAX number: 503-297-6058 3. Permit valid only with attached pages of provisions 4. Applicant shall construct curb and sidewalk to match existing curb and sidewalk. 3 TYPE 4 APPROACH ROAD -CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE:All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the current State of Oregon Standard Specifications for Highway Construction D r w y I W = 26' Wt 32' x = 4 K = 6' I -- I ANGLE OF SKEW APPROACH TYPE CURB TYPE R/W Line i -- 90 A C /r A \\� r NOTES: W. WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY B X/ W 6 \` (Note s..�} ,,,/ 'J 1 )( ` K= DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK `ac / 1 2 Q PRESENT OR FUTURE WALK OR 10 FEET, kr- P / WI MN WHICHEVER IS LESS C'LC on c Curb _jC W I SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE PLAN x= SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE 734-3307E I8-961 SEE PAGE 2 OF APPLICATION INERAL PROVISIONS FOR ROAD API ACH PULELINE, PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS H SLC,i° Hwy 141 M.P. 5.29 WORKSITE 1. Applicant must call for utility locates before digging (1-800-332-2344). You may be held liable for damages. qs 2. Applicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site. They shall be available to the District Maintenance manager or representative at their request. in 3. The permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. 4 4. The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean up shall be at the applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each workday, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. 5. All damaged or removed highway signs shall be replaced by the applicant. Installation shall be according to MUTCD standards or District Manager's specification, and shall be completed as soon as possible, no later than the end of the work shift, ca 6. The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. TRAFFIC al 7. The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Hiahways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto, Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. All traffic control devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook, 8. Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each phase of the work, showing signs and cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative in advance of construction or maintenance. 9. No work will be permitted on the roadway during hours of darkness nor between 6-9 am or 3-6 pm unless prior authorization received from the District Manager or his representative. CONSTRUCTION CE1 10. All rock shall be from an ODOT Certified material source. 0,11. All work shall comply with the approved plans and specifications. Any work not in compliance shall be replaced, removed, or repaired to meet the satisfaction of the District Manager or his representative. APPLICANT DOT REP /7 DATE DONALD L. MURRAY CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering Services Telephone (503) 697-5984 1502 Country Club Road Fax # (503) 697-1009 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 February 10, 1999 Re : Superior Signs water quality and detention requirements . The City of Tigard and the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) have policys for water detention and quality outlined in the "Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Management", July 1996 . As for storm water detention, rather than performing the usual downstream analysis, the City of Tigard has already determined that on site detention will be required for new construction in this area. Per USA "On-site Detention Criteria" 3 . 10 . 3, storm water run-off rates are to not exceed pre-development rates, based on a 2- through 25-year, 24-hour return storm. The site of the proposed Superior Signs office building, 12525 S . W. Hall Boulevard, has a total area of 14, 698 square feet or 0 . 337 acre . This area is presently composed of a gravel parking area of 4, 863 square feet, building and concrete walkway area of 2, 474 square feet for an impervious area of 7, 337 square feet leaving a lawn area of 7, 361 square feet. The current inlet time will be computed to the storm MH to the NW of the site in Scoffins Street . The fall across the site to the edge of asphalt of Scoffins Street is from elevation 177 to 174 in about 180 feet . From Drawing No. 010-CH3 this reads for short grass or lawns at a velocity of 1 . 0 feet per second or 180 seconds, across the pavement of Scoffins Street at 6% yields 5' per second for 6 seconds, and 135' in a ditch with a slope of 2 . 4% at 3' per second yields 35 seconds, for a total inlet time of 3 . 7 minutes . For the combined "C" factor, using 0 . 9 for the impervious areas and for type c soil at less than 5% slope gives a C of 0 . 30 for the lawn area, yielding a combined "C" of 0 . 599. Thus the present runoff rate for a 25 year storm using the Rational Method Q=CIA is Q = 0 . 599*3 . 4*0. 337 = 0 . 69 cubic feet per second For the proposed developed site, the new impervious area will be 10, 920 square feet and 3, 778 square feet of landscaped area, yielding a new combined "C" of 0 . 733 . The proposed developed site would have an inlet time of 200 feet at 3' per second for 66 seconds, 100 feet (through swale) at 0 .3 feet per second for 333 seconds, and 250 feet through pipe at 3' per second for 83 seconds, yielding an inlet time of 8 . 03 minutes . Note that the inlet time for the developed site is greater than the inlet time for the predeveloped site and the impervious areas are not very different . Using the attached "DETENTION BASIN SIZING" spread sheet, we see that the required detention volume is quite small at 45 cubic feet . This is much less than the incidental storage of our water quality swale . The flow depth with 0 . 69 cfs flowing through the water quality swale yields a storage volume of approximately 6' *0 . 38' *100' = 228 cubic feet, which is much greater than the 45 cubic feet we are required to detain. Thus NO WATER DETENTION FACILITY IS REQUIRED IF THE WATER QUALITY SWALE IS BUILT . The City of Tigard and USA have a policy for surface water quality requiring a 65 percent removal of the phosphorous from the newly constructed impervious surfaces . Our concept for disposal of the phosphorous from the impervious area is to collect the storm water runoff into a "Lynch" type trapping catch basin and then discharge this water to a water quality swale . The phosphorus and other contaminates will be removed from the water at the rate of 15% for the trapping basins and 50% for the water quality swale, thus yielding a 65% removal rate. The design of the Bioswale is summarized in the attached "BIOFILTRATION SWALE WORKSHEET" . The impervious area of 10, 820 square feet yields a volume of 325 cubic feet of water to be treated in four hours . This yields a flow rate of 0 .23 cfs . The swale design with a 4' wide flat bottom and side slopes of 4 to 1 computes to a flow depth of 0. 055 feet and a velocity of 0 . 1 feet per second. This yields in a 100-foot long swale a residence time of 16. 6 minutes, which is much greater than the required 9 minutes . USE A BIOSWALE WITH A 4-FOOT FLAT BOTTOM, 4 TO 1 SLOPING SIDES, AN OVERALL SLOPE OF 1 . 5% AND A LENGTH OF 100 FEET LONG. REFERENCES : Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Management, July 1996. Portland, Lake Oswego, Clackamas County, Unified Sewerage Agency, Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook, August 1991 . Controlling Urban Runoff: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, July 1987 . ,` F.D PRDFi Respectfully, GINF n aV 96944'1 Donald L. Murray P.E . oRCaoN q4 p ‘\/‘\. Usadets DETENTION BASIN SIZING SUPERIOR SIGNS 2/11/99 STORM RAINFALL RUNOFF OUTFLOW STORAGE DURATION INTENSITY VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME T I CIAT QT C-D 0.69 cfs x Time 5 3.40 251.96 207.00 45 6 3.22 286.35 248.40 38 7 3.04 315.40 289.80 26 8 2.86 339.11 331.20 8 9 2.68 357.49 372.60 -15 10 2.50 370.53 414.00 -43 15 2.10 466.87 621.00 -154 20 1.80 533.57 828.00 -294 25 1.60 592.85 1035.00 -442 26 1.56 601.15 1076.40 -475 30 1.40 622.49 1242.00 -620 35 1.28 661.40 1449.00 -788 40 1.15 681.78 1656.00 -974 45 1.08 716.98 1863.00 -1146 50 1.00 741.06 2070.00 -1329 55 0.96 778.49 2277.00 -1499 60 0.91 809.24 2484.00 -1675 70 0.82 850.74 2898.00 -2047 Page 1 2/14/99 BIOFILTRATION SWALE WORKSHEET (January, 1996) Project Name: SUPERIOR SIGN OFFICE BUILDING City Project Number: Computed By: DLM Date: 2/10/99 Company: SUPERIOR SIGN OFFICE BUILDING Address: 12525 S.W. HALL BLVD. Phone Numbers: New Impervious Area Calculation. Total Site Area: 0.34 acres 0 sq. ft. home sites: = 0 lots © 2,640 sq, ft./lot = 0 sq. ft. buildings: 5,757 sq. ft. parking area: 5,063 sq. ft. sidewalk area: 0 sq. ft. street area: 0 sq. ft. other area: 0 sq. ft. Total Impervious Area: 10,820 sq. ft. 0.25 acres Design Flow Rate. Design Storm: 0.36 inches of rain falling in 4 hours. Calculate the volume to be treated. Vol. = (0.36)X(1 ft./12 in.)X 10,820 sq. ft. = 325 cu. ft. • imp. area volume Calculate the design flow rate over the 4 hour storm period. Flow rate = 325 cu. ft./(4 hrs. X 3600 sec.) = 0.023 cfs volume Trapezoidal Swale Characteristics. Design Flow Rate: 0.023 cfs Manning's "n" value: 0.25 Bottom Width: 4 ft. Side Slopes (both sides) 4 H:1V Channel Slope: 0.015 ft./ft. Flow Depth 0.055 ft. Flow Top Width 4.44 ft. Flow Velocity: 0.1 ft./sec Required Swale Length. Calculate the swale length needed for the 9 minute residence time. (9 min.)X(60 sec./min.) X 0.1 ft./sec. = 54 feet velocity 100 foot minimum h:\andy_h\quality\Bioswale Page 1 SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY February 24, 1999 Superior Sign Design Review Narrative 18.360 The new Superior Sign building is designed as a 5,197 square foot up-scale commercial building with a provision for storage on the second level. . The new superior sign building as shown on the attached elevation drawing will provide a commercial building design that will up lift and enhance the appearance of the area located at Hall Blvd and Scoffins Street. This new building will use natural materials such as natural colored masonry and a roof system that is architecturally pleasing with The City of Tigard's creative design. 18.520 The proposed new facility is located in a CBD zoned district. This retail sign business is a permitted use in this district. The low volume nature of this retail business lends it self to this location. 18.705 The access, egress at this site is controlled by ODOT, a separate permit is required to allow access on to Hall Blvd. The preliminary response from ODOT is to allow the assess on to Hall Blvd,. with one modification requiring the existing access be relocated to the south allowing more distance from the intersection of Hall Blvd. and Scofffins Street. 18.730 The set back required per code is 20' on the west side of the building. We are proposing a 15' set back on the rear side of the building to include a landscape design that will buffer the new proposed building from the rear property. With this irregular shape site the 15' set back will allow a more efficient use of the site. 18.745 As stated in 18730 we will be providing additional landscaping to buffer the rear of the building from the property to the west. The overall landscaping solution as drawn on Al is showing 3,602 square feet of landscaped area equaling 24.4%. 18.755 As shown on site plan Al we have provided adequate area for the trash and recyclables. This area is accessible for the haulers from Soffins Street. 18.765 The parking solution is located on site for this facility. We have provided 15 spaces as required by code. 18.790 With the required parking and water quality requirements, this site is not large enough to allow for any of the existing trees to remain. This new facility will provide overall, a greater landscaped area then is required per code, see attached landscape drawing L1,L2. 18.795 As shown on the site plan Al the new building is set back on the site with the parking on the front side close to Hall Blvd, allowing for open line of site from Soffins Street and Hall Blvd., 18.810 The street standards on Hall Blvd are per ODOT standards, All utilities, sanitary and storm will conform to applicable standard construction specifications of the City of Tigard. • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard I. J'cigivE/ C �i// //9///t S , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 4/9 versa ifiZ , 19/8 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near)) /025-15- -C• 4J- MOIL L?4,,D. /l <ZO i a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at ��piN S i / /7-6)0',4Ze with postage prepaid thereon. / i144- ice, .. Signature .. In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I, day of ki20 Wk./3/A, , 19q2 —• OFFICIAL SEAL r ; nom= MARSI D ANDERSON / �/. NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON / �' � `� �'��� �.;. COMMISSION NO. 307449 I NOT RY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 19.2001 , My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) FNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: . v/,1,(€ ft 3—/G-I1/4/ (TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 000' 7 _- „ iyE •• :Name of Applicant/Owner: /2 jqE -14 N10/..NJa0A Address or General Location of Subject Property: /..1. S.44-1 //A!4L /3 vA.7.. Rz Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): ,Z S Ge70Z A D CJ010, h:Vo9In\pattyYnasters∎artmad.mst L F" • /� November 30, 1998 SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Clark Zeller 01 13290 S.W. Shore Drive Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Superior Sign Project Dear Interested Party: Sabre Construction Company is representing the owner of the property located at 12525 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location for a 5,000 square foot commercial building. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting to be held on December 15, 1998. This meeting will be held at Sabre Construction Company, 7235 S.W. Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon 97224 at 6:00 p.m. Please notice that this will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City of Tigard. We look forward to more specifically discussing the-proposal with you. Please call me at (503)639-5151 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely Yours SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Michael Candianides Building Consultant CCB U32944 7235 SW Bonita Road • Tigard, OR 97224 • P.O. Box 231026 • Portland, OR 97281 • Telephone 503/639-5151 • Fax 503/620-6005 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS WITS) NOTIFICATION LIST NH APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PHOPOSALS - . WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE EAST CIT SOUTII CIT CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude Craig Hopkins Jack Biethan 11905 SW 125th Cowl 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 7430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 91223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-1068 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F. Mahon John Bennett) 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 524-6325 (503)524-4550 (503)639-0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters Pat Wyden 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)524-5200 (503) 590-1970/(503) 624-8009 (503)620-7662 , Ed Howden Barbara Saltier Scott Russell Sue Rorman 11829 SW Morning bill 11245 SW Morgen Cowl 31291 Raymond Creek Road 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose, OR 97056 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)524-6040 (503)684-9303 (503) 543-2434 Bonne&Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 590-0461 (503) 590-0523 (503) 590-4297 Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-3369 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. ii 1logrnknal tYSn Iasi Cr Wit notlr mst I I Mar 97 • _ 4y. ' M 1 •, ' - 3 4 Nt. tin } np{'• T " a� ,�ti .ws. + - �M�.li4 f Y � f Robert&Patricia Clickener •. : '' Steve Nitsos :' Y `,r "' ; ` „ ' r . ,,, ,` l , Kelly&Janice Mc ,, I_ 13855 SW Pacific Hwy ;s, .ii..; k 8465 SW Hunziker Rd .. r�;, & 12530 SW Hall Blvd �,� , Tigard,OR 97223 I ' Tigard OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 4„ I L „..1■ I :"'':.:"- mot v-;'. ,_ mil « u- ` — ---- -- __ — — r W— -- F -- James King l SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES AMERICAN LEGION THE&TIGARD P 12650 SW Hall Blvd :`.' 1 PO Box 930 I : PO Box 23482 Tigard,OR 97223 ; l Wilsonville,OR 97070 +:,,, I Tigard,OR 97281 E I Merrill&Charlotte Hodges Ronald Bump TIGARD MANOR APARTMENTS LLC 40 Old Stark Rd PO Box 1652 1 10222 SE Crest Hill Rd Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97266 HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOC INC J Ronald Thompson&I Cecilia J Ronald&Cecilia Thompson 12555 SW Hall Blvd 8610 SW Scoffins St#26 8610 SW Scoffins St#26 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 • Gail Snyder Gail Snyder Gail Snyder 14460 SW 141st Ave 14460 SW 141st Ave 14460 SW 141st Ave Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Douglas Leach 8430 SW Hunziker Rd#200 Portland,OR 97223 P NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET ,r `!°` Tuesday, December 15, 1998 r Proposed Project: Superior Signs SABRE Tigard, Oregon CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Name: �h A"7 /11'c'(6WSignature: • �i (Please print) Address: 7/�>,X ifie(440./ fl-e75 Name: 9 /-4a ,a Signature: /434 (Please Print) Address: //7 5--Z=1 s F c /711-"i 6-4-120" ; 411/ • Name: i� �77:22;v0//47/1/41;c.- Signature: _44 :... /.. 4442 (Please Printr Address: 46r4_ Name: Signature: (Please Print) Address: Name: Signature: (Please Print) Address: Name: Signature: (Please Print) Address: CCB #32944 7235 SW Bonita Road • Tigard, OR 97224 • P.O. Box 231026 • Portland, OR 97281 • Telephone 503/639-5151 • Fax 503/620-6005 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A. APPLICATION CHECKLIST CRY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what Is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: WIZ_ Date: ((Z`li 3 IiALICATboN & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE./MARKED ITEMS ' II A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization 0' C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed (2" D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 13 E) Filing Fee SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLU 1 DE ./MARKED ITEMS If A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 3 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions Ii 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds E 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: (a) Floodplain areas (b) Slopes in excess of 25% 12, (c) Unstable ground at, (d) Areas with high seasonal water table o, , (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils t/ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: B' (a) Wildlife habitats Q, (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ta' (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0' 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 0" 10. Location of existing utilities and easements c ✓ 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways ta' 1 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 1 OF 3 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties Q% (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas o, (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas 0 (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions d 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques Q, 10. The location of mailboxes Q, 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation (217 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ra' C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ( U The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines t3' (b) Slope ratios 0' (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) r3' (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development d 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report o' (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals o' (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated e' LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Draw...gs Indicating: No. of Copies - The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies I () The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 0' 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ta' 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces e 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials ta" 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions Q, (b) Erosion control measures that will be used (z' F) Sign Drawings: Eztv Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preliminary Pa • ion/Lot Li e Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1. T• - owner of the su•ject parcel ❑ 2. he owner's author'zed agent ❑ The map scale (2 11,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of p.rcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, widt and names of streets, easements and other public ways within . d adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of . I permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property Ii -s 7. Location a d width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater call.- at 4 feet above ground I:vel 9. All slop:s greater than 25% o 10. Locatio of existing utilities a - tility easements ❑ 11. For majtr land partition . ich creates a public street: (a) The •ropos-. t-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve rip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PAGE 3 OF 3 J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ 10Jogin\patty4nastersV-cklist.mst May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION./LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATIONS '�'ll� City of Tigard, Oregon FEE SCHEDULE PRQCEDURE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE $ 80 APPEALS > Director's Decision to Planning Commission $ 250 > Hearing Referee $ 500 > Planning Commission/Hearing's Officer to City Council $1,745 + Transcript APPROVAL EXTENSION $ 150 BLASTING PERMITS $ 145 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING > Text Only, Map Only, or Both $ 4,015 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW $ 1,615 DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISION REVIEW > Single-Family Building Plan $ 40 > Commercial/Industrial/Institution $ 250 EXPEDITED REVIEW • > Land Partition $ 1,280 > Subdivision $2,625 + $10/Lot HEARING POSTPONEMENT $ 115 HISTORIC REVIEW/OVERLAY DISTRICT $ 2,190 HOME OCCUPATION (Type I:) $ 30 Original Permit (Type H:) $ 255 INTERPRETATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE > By the Community Development Department $ 340 LAND PARTITION > Residential and Non-Residential $ 780 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ 270 MINOR MODIFICATION TO APPROVED PLAN $ 100 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT > Conceptual Plan Review $ 2,170 > Detailed Plan Review $ 510 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE FEE $ 240 SENSITIVE LANDS > Administrative $ 745 > Hearings Officer $ 1,240 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS $ 69` SIGN PERMIT > 0-24 sq.ft./24-100 sq.ft./100 + sq.ft. (No size oifferential)$ 50 > Temporary Signs (Per Sign) $ 15 PROCEDURE (Page 2of2) FEE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW > Under $100,000 $ 800 > $100,000-999,999 $ 1,600 > $1 Million/Over $1,780 + $5/$10,000 SUBDIVISION > Preliminary Plat $2,125 + $ 10/Lot > Final Plat $ 295 TEMPORARY USE > Director's Decision $ 315 > Special Exemption/Non-Profit -0- TREE REMOVAL $ 160 VACATIONS $1530 Deposit + > Streets and Public Access Actual Costs Charged VARIANCE > Administrative $ 545 > Flexible Setback S 390 > Hearing's Officer S 535 > Sign Code $ 535 > Subdivision $ 505 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS* $ 1,160 ZONE CHANGE $ 1,505 ZONING ANALYSIS (Detailed) $ 150 ZONING INQUIRY LETTER (Simple) $ 50 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT S 1,415 100%of Highest Planning Fee JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE + 20% Of All Additional Fees Related To The Proposal. EFFECTIVE 711196 (Resolution No.96-30, Repealing Resolution No. 91-01) * • Indicates that the current City policy is to waive the City's appiicatton processing fee h'nattyvnasterstpingfees.mst 07/17/96 11.47 AM AMERICAN 1° 09-c8 g98E P.07/08 790 787 FROM s F I RST TITLE 15:09 ' roer ram-trio etrArnoe Fo AM anal E►THE rMTnarr e — uur..•Iy a r,•,a„t. IIq •1[-[,IL•[.1 oiM.N,•ll..,w(,...ro.tiw f,Li:--' 1 r-7-------.- ------ °'� auAtwa maR sr no —� ......, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT + S That.. . „J1q.. Claer.lruelhr ulfedX sideret/an ha the /raptor), the rpovN o/ ..... rare/ler .. ........_ Feared _......named, hue berQeirted and pewee here/ -° unto ... ,.. SALLY . , hes e . said and by then hereinafter oarrall an eon,convey art undivided o�• ArseenrE does grant, bet hat! al the following lain, all and g described real property Ousts!n ,.WASH. _ . '(. •Co called the Q' x Catniy.Or. grantee), • LPL DESCRIPTION ATTAC .p AS 'A' �°�, to-wit: GfIBZT ,� i 3e 2. 4 together with all and sirt I�' t'`u +wumutr,r, gulat fhe toy+Nut outNrr+pH oN rrvrdt l+ary r V o i.airtwit nerrrente, lferedlfartfenta and TO HAVE aDPVrfenancss (hereunto belontllrtl dr fir. E AND TO HOLD said undivided anywise 1f The above named orre•hell vf said reef �• ed rantnr retains a like undivided tr OPope`!y unto the Pone of this rostrum said grantee I tent an ant to create and there hereby is created �nlE�said oaf property �r II I • to said real property, A Y end it is the infant and puts Y the entirety � The true end actual consideration y betty°Ort husband end wife es �• mNowaT The the ochre! Paid for this transle-, staled in l� oar:wev r, the consideration Consists des other rr letrrls ov value given fa (indicate whielr),mrr a! or inch � _O_ WITH property or value pavan or � 855 grantor's rend this�7 day of be eh.• ,m,rt nee.pprr(,�,r. Prorrused whleh it THIS INSTRUMCNT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPCATr p`. ` / ldd•l�r�s� ' SCRIBED IN THIS JNSTAU1rEHT IN v104A7ICN OF ApP 19 / �R5 DJ,O)D.) • USC LAWS AN I Ro5TFluk Emr BEFORE S16NING L(CABCE LAND '/ i THIS INSTAUMCHT, THE PERSON ACOUIRIN(j p OR ACCEPTING ^ ( J. PRQPEiITT SHOULD CHECK 1wlTN CE TITLE TO THE YA[ QfO COUNTY PI-sHOU1. DEPARTM THE APPq'PRIAT CK J, IfX CHT TO VERIFY APPROVED USIES OR STATE OF OREGON C ,. ovnty ol........ This instrument ._......._.uSw.�C,G,0..1�:• a •� bY........7.....\• C��r� r�a acknowledged before me on. s� '-~ •• .A. .C' .k.J.' •• • . •...._.»......... !9•!... . ........,.................. .4., ..(‘..........6...1..4.4_NotacyArblie for pre My commission espiree.. .( ,� Oregon • SYAr -OF OREGON, Courtly of. es. J certify that the within ;miry. i e ent we, received for ncnrd ..ow.Nr� �...._ ...... . . ..cloy at e on tl1 .�tiT ti, t . o'clock /9. ... .., . JACKYFAU?C [-.G[A[[fMV[J M.,and recorded •oI in book/reel/volume N 12525 SW v.[ pale . o... . ...+Ll. BLVD. or ns/eY on -2'IG , OR 97224 r+Tentirtticro/r'lm/re-cr /111e/instw. Recur Ahun Na,. . N.u(.+oowr�[.s+. d of Deed , waI•�..It�.«,w,r.n+..���. 4.11... a o/ t.id county, _JACXItAYFr� +ww "•' »+ Count wirnel. my !rand and real of .... ►.a+ +o«��... Y e!/fired. . ........... 5• s ElLVD. : .-TIGARD._pR. 97224 A N.." 1252 8Y.• ...isoAssei.pp Deputy °_______` _ _._ _ —ter FROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 503 790 7872 19 a9-28 15=09 #988 P.08/0q OESCRIPTION: The Washington described props • '' ' i _ hfttaton and Suite of p situated In the City of Tigard, . Oregon, to-wit: D . Caunrr of A portion of Lot 79,TIOARD HIGHWAY Washington County, Oregon, described TRACTS, duly recorded subdivision in Beginning et the Northeast corner of Lot 19, TIQq . South in in 88°47'the Nt 151.8 feet; RO HIGHWAY TRACT ' thence South 1° , rennin 86°62' East 148.7 feet to a 1S East 74.2 feet; thence South thence Highway; point on the Northweateriy bound, g y; thence Northeasterly following the boundary of said Hi therein: thence Northerly following boundary of the State the true place of beginning: g the Westerly boundary Highway to an angle ry of the Salta Highway to � EXCEPT/NQ THEREFROM that portion of to the State of Oregon, by peed dated January hatelnabovs described property 441, Washington County Deed Records: ry $' 1962, recorded a gok 1;conveyed � ALSO EXCEPTING , Page to the State of NG THEREFROM bEFROM that portion of the - and the 95059877.State f by Deeds recorded August herein, 95 in Fe property 9878 - Fee Naa. 95069876 } • I September 04. 1996 ' • 2 WI529457 ' 3 . r AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, ////c 211 ( .dN ,gy.20 c , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 3 ' .'t c.e.,/ylenfic JjQ Lev/ID/A/G affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 42-5.25 S.tkJ 6foIL /3'IvD., ?TG) j De , and did on the .29�/./ day of Nevcvv%T.e 19 78 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a TrE L7evdapvEA-r /'£y/Et ) application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at /02-5-2-S. S.4J, ALL. �iOc.Ei n. RA,/. J?.0 vL7 (state location you posted notice on property) ice. A4 w`! Signature (In he presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 15-1 y'day of LI , 1011. 1 J I,.= OFFICIAL SEAL MARSI D ANDERSON �fNOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON f C6(4,4__, Alidj_RA-cr-A._ r � COMMISSION NO. 307449 / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 19,2001 f NO RY PUBLIC OF OREGON L'�'`1'�11. ` 1'`1111 My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: SCI,GWR/UIk 5-(4)4 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: S"a00.C7 ,►-nr+1EgUHL Name of Applicant/Owner: Alir AMEL Cqtitl3/I4N/oES I I Address or General Location of Subject Property: /2 5 .2.s S.AZ fi/ALi- 7GARe2 LSobject Property Tax lap(s) and Lot#(s): .2 S Id 2. A 0 00/Dd h"Jog intpattyVnasters laffpost.mst Robert&Patricia Clickener Steve Nitsos Kelly&Janice McCarthy 13855 SW Pacific Hwy 8465 SW Hunziker Rd 12530 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 James King SMITH GERIG WESTERN PROPERTIES AMERICAN LEGION THE&TIGARD P 12650 SW Hall Blvd PO Box 930 PO Box 23482 Tigard,OR 97223 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Tigard,OR 97281 Merrill&Charlotte Hodges Ronald Bump TIGARD MANOR APARTMENTS LLC 40 Old Stark Rd PO Box 1652 10222 SE Crest Hill Rd Port Ludlow,WA 98365 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97266 HARRIS MCMONAGLE ASSOC INC J Ronald Thompson&I Cecilia J Ronald&Cecilia Thompson 12555 SW Hall Blvd 8610 SW Scoffins St#26 8610 SW Scoffins St#26 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Gail Snyder Gail Snyder Gail Snyder 14460 SW 141st Ave 14460 SW 141st Ave 14460 SW 141st Ave Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 Douglas Leach 8430 SW Hunziker Rd#200 Portland,OR 97223 r # 13 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) - * Parcel :M0943769 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Bonar Gary M Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #18 Tigard Or 97223 Land .• Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$3,790 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$58.01 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 18, MH Bedrm: 1 Bth: YB:1964 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:470 Ac: # 14 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0943901 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Mason Patrick D Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :20749 SW 104Th Ave Tualatin Or 97062 Land .• Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$3,520 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$47. 82 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 36, MH Bedrm: 1 Bth: YB:1962 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:544 Ac: # 15 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0945080 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Perez Lorena C Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #19 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$4, 170 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$59.91 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 19, MH Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1966 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:470 Ac: # 16 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M0945749 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Walker Clemmie T Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #25 Tigard Or 97223 Land .• Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$2,700 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$42.20 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 25, MH Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1961 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:470 Ac: # 17 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0946098 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Furman Richard Leroy Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #34 Tigard Or 97223 Land .• Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$5,400 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$81.36 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 34, MH Bedrm:2 Bth: YB:1965 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:548 Ac: # 18 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0946515 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Heck Deanna G Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #20 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$2,260 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes . Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 20, MH Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1961 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:410 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 19 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) - * Parcel :M0948112 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Asby Nathan Dennis Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #22 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$1,780 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$28.81 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 22, MH Bedrm:l Bth: YB:1959 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:450 Ac: # 20 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0948826 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Bobbitt Alycia B Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #3 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$4, 850 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$73.39 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 3, MH Bedrm: l Bth: YB:1967 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:500 Ac: # 21 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0949692 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Hoerner David Glenn Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #1 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$3,520 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$54.09 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 1, MH Bedrm:2 Bth: YB:1964 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:520 Ac: # 22 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M0991500 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Novy Milan Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #30 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$12,770 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$181.58 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 30, MH Bedrm:2 Bth: YB:1978 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:896 Ac: # 23 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M1151014 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Lewis Judith Kay Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #32 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$9, 800 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$145.24 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 32, MH Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1979 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:576 Ac: # 24 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M1215116 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Rowe Winifred Maxine Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #17 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$3,700 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$56.23 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 17, MH Bedrm:l Bth: YB:1963 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:490 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 25 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :M1253057 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Gertsch Peter A Xfered . Site : 8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . • Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #4 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$2, 640 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$41.31 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 4, MH Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1962 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:390 Ac: # 26 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M1372696 RefPar# :25102AA 03902 Owner :Davidson William G & Dixie L Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . • Mail :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$17,090 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$248.02 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 29, MH Bedrm:2 Bth: YB:1985 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:882 Ac: # 27 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M2038116 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Dortland Sherry Ann Xfered . Site : 8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . • Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #24 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$15,550 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$184.20 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 24, MH Bedrm: Bth: YB:1991 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:672 Ac: # 28 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M2042030 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Brisson Don Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . • Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #5 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$10,220 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$124. 14 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 5, MH Bedrm: Bth: YB:1977 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:644 Ac: # 29 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M2065239 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Dutson Zenos Mayo Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . • Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #14 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use :1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$30,090 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$358.38 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 14, MS Bedrm: Bth: YB:1994 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:420 Ac: # 30 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :M2077964 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Ross M Lundy Xfered . Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8915 SW Commercial St #13 Tigard Or 97223 Land . Use : 1092 Res,Mobile Homes Imp :$30, 860 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$413.48 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Cascade Mobile Villa Legal :CASCADE MOBILE VILLA, SPACE 13, MS Bedrm:1 Bth: YB:1995 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:384 Ac: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 31 * MetroScan / Washington (OR)• * Parcel :R0456036 RefPar# :2S10100 00500 Owner :Gazeley H William Xfered . Site :12600 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price :$1,595,000 Mail :PO Box 230414 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$1, 116, 880 Use :2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone Imp :$899,940 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$20,508.09 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 6.41 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:279,219 BldgSF: Ac:6.41 # 32 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0456045 RefPar# :2S10100 00600 Owner :Gazeley Harry M & Thelma T Xfered :05/23/97 Site :12700 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :7034 SW 83Rd Ave Portland Or 97223 Land :$983,230 Use :3032 Mfg,Improved,Ind Zone,State Respon Imp :$1, 648,580 Census :Tract:308.01 Block:1 98-99 Taxes :$22,434.94 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 6.27, SEE Al ACCOUNT Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:273, 120 B1dgSF: Ac: 6.27 # 33 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460450 RefPar# :2S102AA 03000 Owner :Pietila Elva E Trustee Xfered :05/12/97 Site :8730 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8730 SW Scoffins St Tigard Or 97223 Land :$103,730 Use :2012 Com,Improved Imp :$26, 920 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1, 194.58 Telephone:503-639-1428 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .58 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:25,265 B1dgSF: Ac: .58 # 34 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460469 RefPar# :2S102AA 03100 Owner :American Legion The Xfered :04/20/93 Site :8635 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price :$100, 000 Mail :PO Box 23482 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$171,600 Use :9552 Soc,Fraternal Organization Imp . Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 98-99 Taxes . Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 1.01, NON-ASSESSABLE Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:43,995 B1dgSF: Ac: 1.01 # 35 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460496 RefPar# :2S102AA 03301 Owner :Greenview Investments Inc Xfered :05/04/98 Site : 12345 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price :$865,300 Mail :5229 SE Hill Rd Portland Or 97267 Land :$228,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$552,800 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 98-99 Taxes :$9,449.13 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .62 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:27,007 BldgSF: Ac: .62 # 36 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460502 RefPar# :2S102AA 03400 Owner :Hodges Merrill E & Charlotte Xfered :04/21/93 Site :12375 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :40 Old Stark Rd Port Ludlow Wa 98365 Land :$152,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$491,150 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 98-99 Taxes :$7,777.43 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .68 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:29,620 B1dgSF: Ac: .68 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 37 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460511 RefPar# :2S102AA 03500 Owner :Bump Ronald E & Jo Ann K Xfered :03/04/95 Site :12437 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :PO Box 1652 Tualatin Or 97062 Land :$132, 000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$405,570 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:1 98-99 Taxes :$6,248.67 Telephone:503-638-3950 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .68 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:29, 620 B1dgSF: Ac: .68 # 38 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460520 RefPar# :2S102AA 03701 Owner :Tigard Manor Apartments Llc Xfered :02/11/98 Site :12430 SW Ash Ave Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :10222 SE Crest Hill Rd Portland Or 97266 Land :$247,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$647,770 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$10,735.42 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, TRACT 22, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:28,749 BldgSF: Ac: .66 # 39 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460539 RefPar# :2S102AA 03800 Owner :Paddack Rychen M & A Luella Xfered :10/09/92 Site :12455 SW Ash Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$159,500 Mail :11025 SW Summer Lake Dr Tigard Or 97223 Land :$74,770 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$156, 090 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$2,337.94 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT 23, Bedrm:8 Bth:4.00 YB:1967 Lot Sqft:12, 196 B1dgSF:3,312 Ac: .28 # 40 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460548 RefPar# :2S102AA 03801 Owner :Andrews James Darold Xfered :04/16/98 Site :12405 SW Ash Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$190,000 Mail :21835 SW 70Th Ave Tualatin Or 97062 Land :$67,740 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$139,020 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1, 953.27 Telephone:503-638-7106 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT PT 23, Bedrm:6 Bth:3.00 YB:1963 Lot Sqft:12, 196 B1dgSF:2,720 Ac: .28 # 41 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R0460557 RefPar# :2S102AA 03802 Owner :Bush Danny Michael Xfered :04/06/89 Site : 12435 SW Ash Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$39,000 Mail :180 Meadow Ln Grants Pass Or 97526 Land :$57,030 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$66,390 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$898.64 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .18 Bedrm:2 Bth:2.00 YB:1942 Lot Sgft:7, 840 B1dgSF:1,288 Ac: . 18 # 42 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0460584 RefPar# :2S102AA 03902 Owner :Davidson William G & Dixie L Xfered :10/17/89 Site :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price :$485,000 Mail :8915 SW Commercial St Tigard Or 97223 Land :$333,330 Use :7112 Res,Mobile Home Park Imp :$348,810 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$8,659.51 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 E4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT PT Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:88,426 BldgSF: Ac:2.03 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 43 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0461967 RefPar# :2S102AD 00300 Owner :Harris Mcmonagle Assoc Inc Xfered :04/22/93 Site :12555 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :12555 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Land :$83,530 Use :2012 Com,Improved Imp :$96,260 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$2, 110.85 Telephone:503-639-3453 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT PT 19, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:12,632 B1dgSF: Ac: .29 # 44 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0461976 RefPar# :25102AD 00400 Owner :Thompson J Ronald Xfered :08/09/94 Site :8610 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8610 SW Scoffins St #26 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$408,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$1,299,910 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$20,801.03 Telephone:503-684-4112 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT 18 & 20, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:73,616 B1dgSF: Ac:1.69 # 45 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0461985 RefPar# :2S102AD 00401 Owner :Thompson J Ronald & Cecilia Xfered :10/21/93 Site :8610 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :8610 SW Scoffins St #26 Tigard Or 97223 Land :$128,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$410,500 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$6,562.52 Telephone:503-684-4112 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS, LOT 21, Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:43, 124 B1dgSF: Ac: .99 # 46 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R0461994 RefPar# :2S102AD 00600 Owner :Prunty Craig E & Carrie A Xfered :06/15/98 Site :12645 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price :$114,500 Mail :12645 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Land :$56,430 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$52, 070 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1,115.11 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .39 Bedrm:2 Bth: YB:1940 Lot Sqft:16, 988 B1dgSF:1,548 Ac: .39 # 47 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0462001 RefPar# :2S102AD 00700 Owner :Ehrenfelt Tracey S;Lutz Douglas L Xfered :11/04/98 Site :12665 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price :$199,000 Mail :12665 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Land :$43,560 Use :2012 Com,Improved Imp :$48,230 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1,016.07 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .15 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:6,534 B1dgSF: Ac: .15 # 48 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0462010 RefPar# :2S102AD 00800 Owner :Prunty Craig E & Carrie Xfered :08/05/92 Site :8725 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price :$58,000 Mail :8575 SW Sorrento Rd Beaverton Or 97008 Land :$50,700 Use :2012 Com,Improved Imp :$45,090 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$852.66 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .20 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:8,712 B1dgSF: Ac: .20 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 49 * - MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0462029 RefPar# :2S102AD 00900 Owner :Bookout John R & Fanny Xfered :04/01/93 Site :8775 SW Commercial St Tigard 97223 Price :$525,000 Mail :10459 NW Lost Park Dr Portland Or 97229 Land :$171,000 Use :7012 Res,Multiple Housing,Improvements Imp :$458, 130 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$7,539.03 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .89 Bedrm: Bth: YB: 1969 Lot Sqft:38,768 BldgSF: Ac: . 89 # 50 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R0462047 RefPar# :2S102AD 01100 Owner :Birkemeier Brent T Xfered :11/02/93 Site :*No Site Address* Price :$257,000 Mail :10573 SW Naeve St Tigard Or 97224 Land :$154,290 Use :9852 Soc,Religious Organization,Leased Imp :$157,010 Census :Tract: Block: 98-99 Taxes . Telephone: Thomas Bros: Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .55, NON-ASSESSABLE Bedrm: Bth: YB:1951 Lot Sqft:23, 958 B1dgSF: Ac: .55 # 51 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R1263340 RefPar# :2S102AD 00201 Owner :Snyder Gail V Xfered :04/02/96 Site :8600 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price :$180,000 Mail :14460 SW 141St Ave Tigard Or 97224 Land :$35,000 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$84, 650 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1,233.14 Telephone:503-590-4590 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS PT LOT 19 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1982 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:1,740 Ac: # 52 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R1263359 RefPar# :2S102AD 00202 Owner :Snyder Gail V Xfered :04/02/96 Site :8604 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price :$180,000 Mail :14460 SW 141St Ave Tigard Or 97224 Land :$35, 000 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$86,560 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1,260.61 Telephone:503-590-4590 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS PT LOT 19 Bedrm:2 Bth:1.00 YB:1982 Lot Sqft: B1dgSF:1,740 Ac: # 53 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) * Parcel :R1263368 RefPar# :2S102AD 00203 Owner :Snyder Gail V Xfered :04/02/96 Site :8602 SW Scoffins St Tigard 97223 Price :$180,000 Mail :14460 SW 141St Ave Tigard Or 97224 Land :$35,000 Use :1012 Res,Improved Imp :$84,190 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 98-99 Taxes :$1,226.42 Telephone:503-590-4590 Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv :Tigard Highway Legal :TIGARD HIGHWAY TRACTS PT LOT 19 Bedrm:2 Bth: 1.00 YB:1982 Lot Sqft: BldgSF:1,740 Ac: # 54 * MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R1492058 RefPar# :2S10100 00600 Owner :Columbia Hardwood Moulding Xfered . Site :12700 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :PO Box 23365 Tigard Or 97281 Land . Use :3032 Mfg,Improved,Ind Zone,State Respon Imp :$257,000 Census :Tract:308.01 Block:1 98-99 Taxes :$3,457.75 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 F4 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 6.27, IMPROVEMENT ONLY Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:273,121 B1dgSF: Ac:6.27 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. FROM :FIPST AMER ICAN TITLE SO3 790 7872 I"- 0S:21 #TES F.02/0S • ``�0 tL Pty vi�kttK *`�S'..' 1 • ',u - \40.0 ,e r eN ' • kil FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHO ro ;u gti S rr v In L D Lila 8730 i N -1 . . . ,-'xv` 52 _ Asu fir . in ::::4., ,i `� 1 3 7 5 a r, ry O ` N H N N s4, H 0 HGI/,,,-;.._ 'y`8775 H O O L Af� `, ,ray z s O 0 12 6 4 5 .xt 0 `� 12 665 z•-1:,, `� \\ ^^ 4 'as ..iii; 12 7 0 0 A P T ,,-,- ) � JI ' / . 1 V /`'' o ��� A q I x‘, I rn v- ice; /.. s i . ------ ) r....„..„-----„ irs.) ( . FROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE SO3 7=40 7F77. 1 ' '03-1S OS:21 #76S-. R.L 3.. OF. 5 ' —,' 1 V 'x �, 505 1 i 1 41 tr Itaen B ti /— / _ D.3�AG ., 10 A i uetN[NT..•_r i �f /X� .. .4 '6' M t {ca.1q>nll SEE MAP 2 3 I 185 _ 904 603`• 1 1 eNa : . ,� 2331~ ��••t .Se�e.� iN `/ "� ,e 5100` '...67:;.1..:•*. l •^ _ee 636 Q` — 1 l w e••,deY` t ✓ �, X5 �'s• 903 906 { ero° l� r4CAG ' 1 I 300 11 4 •- .39Aa 1I jl',./''. 1 I > r .430ge '. 1t / ..fie, • Ca 2302 ' 144 ' 3200 VS.At °• 11 2 • AsAC f+1OIt2W 11 .)M 2® 31 11 • • 3 4 /' F. I }r� i.e.co Nw,N 4 I 1+ 4. J� r r • .� •wOr loao•r'e 2800 .♦ 2400 ~. :✓S..•Nec7 .2400. �• a.etK ` e• sse .,,3 ,{ -1 P 23 74 H. 3 • ti seec.11073s Il�g � 3a00 2501 ,j '%, A .siA•. 2 -\b. r, s^4 1 O t .,�, INITIAL PT - - -- 'O • 1�il� oe4* \ l.- a , * e ` /24000'• 045 14 0 .. Ae. J rr�� , I,. •� \I V ` ,:o `x. ,'i�'ys Ilel ✓ sal t,P gi c ^ 6Y ac. - Q• . !.� / . s� lb e 1 jr Ac .d' 3100 2 _ ;. 4 r� ..,y / 2800 4 t■ LolAe. s.w xnoLL •:•e• rrw Ise•M %'e.6 j w t p 3 k• �,e----1 ORlvg IIIeNAN➢GON Mt Y\ 2 ,�/ � •`i► / t •• • // / °,:° SEE MAP ` /' • / to ,if,is .I.01A i/ 26 /sue �` �� / 3400 u,.o�o 25 I ISC / / 3000 o• •i/ .6BAe. / �/ UTAe. / /4201 / `/ Ar.a .a1CAG/ / G 1 \ W / i Q 10097 .� /� \J / 1601 ti 17 ' �1 i �.. ' // 20 ti >,/'� - , 3,.' '•tt / .... / // - siurIrs•• _f II / • / 3701 - 3500 • �^� / 3602 / 'l .66 Ac N ,.,A AC. V' .. �A- 3903 ./ as /�Q(a�' ,°- o" c/i AO..it�� / .�' /' y wi 14 , " 23' d/ _� Nrn nT N• v'� 1�O'�wh �f� • • 3000 0 I 1 ,,1f j,F 11ge T 00 I ��T 1* / } 18 • _411"1".. . / _ / r t,s �.• 20 • saoo 1 / \l.. IGARD SEE MAP �j 21 25 czar)czar) \ 18 a ♦a� I 2 A A FF.1iM :FIPST PP1ERICAN TITLE 5O3 790 7972 1'3°_. 03-15 09:22 1:755 F'.04:'05. )N 2 T2S R 1W WM. as 12 AD too COUNTY OREGON /674• .:41"r MOO '? ' /' SEE MAP �+� 2S 1 2A p e •. / 18 22 S.W SCOFFI s ST, ' a coa Ler , S JO „!�/ �1 w )040- - N7.• pY 0 60.)016 �°�1° tii• wcarE�6 `' z6s6/ � M g « 100 N o>\:1%* I SB.oC. ro /�a p� • 900 r� �o° ./ O\ Py 3 S c'.354e .� / ',. �1° .89.4e. 401 y•4 09 ` A.46.15 P.G /e/kv G .k. •' a .97Ae `."��� •+�.y rtr 9p.� i ��- J a / 11 ' Vb ' \c°+•• ✓` �J�^� 20 0 k ��° q.,0 ypG/ s' °) C1,., �/ > , �?prJ Vi/!� ?. O o (CSNe.112411 '00 f,/ ,0.4' $ Q0 �A'''+9 of,JV J � .• � rr 21 �..`\ //� `O. ►►°*' / 1203 �/” .1 ./-* >J/1 cO0 e--• ,-.:\ {'`� j I I "'' 600 c° •/ 9 b •a •` 800 •• �� `'A. ADD J r' J . .N, s, ,20Ac �. *.‘ / \ _r ,may s / / ,-C' `!/"-� r-- 1 \ TPvj•, 5' / 700 ,\ / "-• /44c.3 \ ca 9' -.2000 ' t, 404Ac "I,. `o / x CO / ' �0•�� / ?� TA; `0? 2300 M CANCELLED /Q ! 0i 200 Z 300 / 1/ "n ( y/ 00 / 1. 1201 r44 / • (<1. ' xloo �a'Jv / % SEE MAP boo / °4. T O y e \ 2 S 1 1 /� `, \ (1) I e,� 1Y ti , Is V- ti3O I A• • e4 4,40•• 4,_s 0' ∎icrvV •• f- I O Ar 14 \ vc V N. I 4:, :i \ I \1l V 64P`• DC?' d FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY Q DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE P A 11\ w ' s• ►s • i • 1D o I I FROM :FIRST RMER!CPN T t TL 507. 790 7872 19' — Q3-15 O9: #766 F'.O5/CIS .,/, 3,1 36 / ... SEE MAP 2 •SI IAA .� 9MOIY !-P0 NO SEE M : ::EE _ trir ITS ►, N J �Nw 1 IL` / V� `9�\ SEE NAV Syr s C \ \ zs l le c S MI E! MAP vp • fy� 2S 1 190 • .\\/ J `y'h . . ...\'4 s w V\ i `�•�\ yi♦ '', co,.., X00 .f .40, ms ...../ ,. `p' � « R 2$ SEE MAP ;,wt \ '1 Kra 2$120A \\:« a /j 23-74 A •` .rx1s'1 r1200rr\ '•11.1 " �1:: ��pin,da 1100 r 1Y1 r Y/ww ■ l \ N,N . rIOY \ \ Ifs I s . SEE M.io SEE MAP / \ 25 I I. 251 200 VIC.CYT.Ca' ONTO ,, r.4 IMMY SV.D♦.� MK WYIr M IY'I"r Ii»r 0W.LOT 1 5.:{A[. OW.Lir s C.iCAo.\ II 12 SEE MAP \ SEE MAP 2S I 121113 zs t 12BA *********************** * Current * Sale Statistics ************************************************************************* * Average Sale Price : $342,200.00 * Average Loan Amount : $251, 075.00 * * Number of Sales in last year : 4 * Number of sales in last 6 months : 1 * * * Note: Average Sale Price and Loan Amounts are calculated on full * value sales within the last year. ************************************************************************* ******************* * Farm Statistics * ******************* ******************************************* * Owner Occupied : 32 * Absentee Owner : 22 * * * Average Square Footage : 818 * Average # of bedrooms : 1 * Average # of Bathrooms : 2.00 * Average year built : 1967 * * ******************************************* The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. . „ A, , „ „ , IP 11#41 t g ,0744 IF 4. :741,4 r At4t4eel 4044•4\t/t.,,,,li % 11116 4rglit *A, \\C* VII 40101/40- # Ni* . e \*■ *Attila 4" N1q• \\10....,L, Allia■ I It* - dr - Vatiligirk101 11111 . • 4 -46-v.Valate:, ...7),.n _, 4/ / 4 iii 0004, G. \... 4 �ii�` ' -1 N mr ) L LJ .w Ijjbr iI1i ri• , ill rib illt IMPS M mitl■ AMP Mai* Ma R. A. h .0. =p1 INN .111 Till( I,W** kaz'"d4114111.1W Mgr• Vain MN lo EIN AI:. Nigk WEI "044*4 %- 40.■ . / _ ,.„ ..****414,044,..4;s4 , k II r p- PoL' , Mitil000.— �� t r __44.4■.*A..4-44v 4.#4+.W� A ,0‘2> .V. 40.14 4, !A we ,,_.: 1 ‘9).S ..' .4 Vfr i .ft..4 5 . )c-De .1.\--- 4 V ----1- ,,, '4k.. I-- ' " ,,, ,,.v\ , ) lik /kir 4:11% .e."T- )c---- 'V *I. IftP°N iii eu,,s k. ... ,f, 04, IL So/ R-, 4 *4 . -ck-''CYC 4 li 06 11•1 likki ' 1-P , vtqsanighis ili. *A- _...0.*Ap imam . . is6,- vo w7 OM raw A..--,, 2 k% alisart" =In mu mu illaMillifill Min „._... .... ,,,,,,,,,Y-- 5 IIII La 1111 noniie .,1111 II, ‘Ipr • 744 "11 IIIII _NW 4 WIEN MINE (11 *W. minim ilim 0 e I* 41 ., L- I ii.4v L A4 __*11,14Fip. **, Pf%1111.1 # foirr Anik di, ui . im . inE A, BLvD 1.11 mom romp as ettiti ,u -1.- 1,- !Pr* TT AM IS■ #4 1,10's . . Atfidmi s • ve2p4A. A mom ce rite.-41/4 ■ ft # 14*A Amami - li 411:!, 4\ vr % # #0 . A 4_11. . 44 \ _0\v,egliw - ••• 1 it•-.. •• 1 4011- 1,5 AP. 'it* #Ty vs, . -is -s mq-i r 1 • IdliCALI:Wa1111Piv■AVP015 - . 2 , • 4 . c,_ A ita Falltirt14" 11, 31.1k, A AtI*6 °P 4';\ r7=, soillimmw, / -11"5 % . 1 7i. ' '47 1 N \ N. # 7\ -.ow 0-■ rt-"P- .t948--' 7k.- L4C__ c"( 4-8— <2..C5NC et."1—j I It A__,L '111414\. . ; i r _ 4. mx« 4 �. . ,. 1 41 r: III its. i. a 7 " k '' / y � i .A' } y V �v # i "S'144• se iw 6 I r w e 'OP. _ S.W. SCOFFINS ST. PAP •O-romp m S . ` PROJECT DATA t(Civ =SP NOD . .•w.1.• .Nr.r• --.. - Q OCCUPANCY a ■ ► ., _ Ti - - astii? JIM - - y .: 0O$rTRUC TVA TYPE V-1I `.-_1---- -- UM I.MO.c.MM!-.s.7� .' - ®; ,i. 1 - - - 4 :l..i• wow-en+ LERED y - RAI r' ' t''''' 1 — '. NLLLDIq hW]OHT 2 STORY / IS'-O' i . • . :4Q AREA 1.094137 Rill 2 197 SF. � s • A.O. PAV2.0 AREA $.109 If avu.e Z I1 GOWC WALE AREA 1132 IF $ -�.' r It • WOWCAPE AREA 3,7711 IF N121111 �_ - °i1 N f IRE AREA 1.713 BP ! �..: ._ '1,F 1`' g. rc.n...c 111 O 1• READ 2AlKNO .+ we. 1311 SPACES W "t`. . AwM el.... PARA11q PROVDED a IPACEE p' L . F ,_ f'Ra o 2 D $`1` �••..v.o ;�• ® G (1) 11:11 m IiJ Q I 1k I • _ I'i t1, I Rw F I 3 td1 \ al •" 1 I MVP w N 1� y 1e. J IT . ... _...,. U1 .. Saint -- av, I 0 to 1 1 1 it I- 44. *1:114'.' . Ei .741) .0. ..., ,,, ... 1111k!, la*N9 # _ d'PrA, k ri Art ,, il • . 4. , . 4\TVtr\_.e IMO: d RY l .. PARKING j ..P.....,o... id �. ��10 r 1.um + a a LEGAL DESCRIPTION l '4 r+r+olc>+ca+n+ ` --G-•.b �.4V . / . � I 'N m{ never Si. i GAO ►.�- ".. \ f Y V4 • NORTH i lei A 1 .1 �,,,/ 1 SITE PLAN o= VICINITY MAP rJ �rj, , 2.1,,_99 • QBr Y we' ■ Irv' r-r rY w , IrT -.- MT ■ rY 1•• re-e• Y r •.r � ' Cy ■4',/ tl F I I I I SPACE 'A' 1 2 I ' 1 CAR BAY ) I t t—� 6 _ 'I 1ic -•--. � (ii) � , N � � ri_ I h L___ 4"OMPUTER� I I I AREA! i RE CEP ON 1 ; t 4 1 I l _ i i WORK AREA _-T _ / (.... (wM.l a i ONF UNCH � 4 � 1•'•. OF�CIIE 11 —1 , 1 If ‘ ENQRAVINGI — ■ ' '" G r 1'—, 1 SPACE 'B' 4 I } ; a d um imul. (--- l- ) i i ! _ ,ll t 117 M i • 1 rT 14'Y r.p r.. KY 0 FLOOR PLAN MORTH 2-1i-99 , P�� 1 4v\ t� :/y -.41g11111111111j11111111111111111111111111111111111110 11,:: Mr1/1/7- '_1'111I1111I'II 111111111../�..«,. ,o.IM1 9 11 ILl I I. .ICU f iA l _�_� ,_ _ — ' — il OWN ittl L T � m 0 © EAST ELEVATION © SOUTH ELEVATION R a 1 No 'Id pfd arw w.l Mope M.1 mw.w.'../ow.re• r �mmr..wm. �, rlfrls/r/ ATR _..gralll ! '°'m. .I111i1111111111111111lllllllll 1111IIIIIIIII rillf�� M ..\Q i I! M FIE- ∎ MK^ i MOW lean MiTh—liWI ; gl U'.•r-w DYl O.W1 P. 1yq pppA W "ff4MC11O4 RR MN.�/.IWIW 1H/I.O%m. © NORTH ELEVATION VIlk••,.-0. , WEST ELEVATION ,ed.•r-ir A3 Y-1i-99 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITYOFTICARD PRE APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CocrT mm a un aDvi on ent (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(61 Months) Shaping Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL 4- PRE-APP.MTG.DATE STAFF AT PRE-APP �—, - 31.z / 91 APPLICANT: AGENT: t ' , C ^ ^f- Phone:[ ] Phone: [ ] PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: I 2-- 6 ? r 51,4 }- 0 . TAX MAPESI/LOT#[S]: 5 I o 7. ,: Tr",n NECESSARY APPLICATION[S]: S o PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: C3„ 1 c1 s-1 4 7 s F ski:,10 K--T-C-o .S --)'v x�t..- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN t .S MAP DESIGNATION: c t3 O ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: CB 0 C.I.T.AREA FACILITATOR: PHONE: [503] ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS re_v cv■.c� Se rJ cwt �c-., suk,t H MINIMUM LOT SIZE: f c2xLsq. ft. Average lot width: 0 ft. Maximum building height: Fe ft. Setbacks: Front 013o ft. Side 0/3° ft. Rear 013 o ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: if-5—% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18. 01-0 • ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED ' TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the ap licable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 MOM-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS D STREETS: .9 S feet from the centerline of 14 D ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from • D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: Y A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D. All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/z) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) 3//03 . PARKING AND ACCESS . 5 (13'� REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 7"n�. -- A af"�` 3 (I(o s�a_4-4/1� Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): j S a_4 CArSee .fin ter. cL. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: v,s a d-A (1/0 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: /, p// 00 • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. Y Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that 60 !7 cc `t separates the parking space from an adjoining space. 1 e_ (-th-n7o a Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) et_b Handicapped Parking: r� Tom_ Y All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. :- BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: t Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.105) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-AesldentlalAppllcatlon/Plannlnp Division Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080] CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18395] BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745] The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Besldential Appllcatloa/Plaonlop Bhdsion Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential AppllcaUou/Planeiup Division Section ➢ WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetaL..0 corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM] WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). y The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.030] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Holes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential AppliaUon/Planning Division Section Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.100f TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Besldentlal Application/Planning Division Section MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. y If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.E.) NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32) CODE CHAPTERS 18.330 18.390 18.520 18.715 _ 18.765 18.795 _ 18.350 18.420 18.530 18.730 18.775 18.797 18.360 18.430 18.620 18.745 18.780 _ 18.800 18.370 18.510 18.705 18.755 18.790 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE II__ IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the wCf development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planing OMelon Section NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88041 BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-lesldentlal Appllcatlen/Maanlna DMsloa Section - FRJCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of ood site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4171 FAX: 503 684-7297 E-MAIL: staf s first name)@ ci.tigard.or.us is\cu rpl n\masters\revised\preapp-c.nsst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Resldentlal AppllcaUon/Planning Division Section To: Mark Roberts 2/16/99 Associate Planner City of Tigard Dear Sir: Enclosed is a copy of a signed development review application that I was asked to sign by the contractor of the person who is trying to buy and develop my property. I have signed this giving my permission for them to proceed providing they disclose alt facts concerning the project. I have given them written notice of my concerns on this matter. (1)the applicant must be the purchaser of record and the contracter is listed as such (2)The proposal summary is inaccurate in as it does not state that there will be two. 1,000 square foot spaces in this building to be leased out to other businesses. They have also asked me to submit an application to ODT to change the access to my property. I am not willing to take on the responsibilities that the Permittee would have. I also believe that the application should say retail shops(3)in the space titled approach to serve. I am not willing to place my signature on any document that is incomplete or misleading. Sincerely: Jack Mayeaux d i a.? 0 3 rP6 To: Mike Candianides Sabre Construction 2/15/99 Dear Sir: In response to your asking me to sign the Site development Review Application for the development of my property at 12525 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard Or. I will sign this application providing it is accurate and complete. I am concerned that(1)the applicant must be the purchaser of record and you are listed as that person while the real purchaser is Brent Hilsop (2)The Proposal summary is inaccurate in as it does not indicate that there will be Two ,1000 sq. ft spaces in this building to be leased out to other businesses. . I believe this should be disclosed on this application. I do not wish to sign any document that is misleading or incomplete. I am signing this document in good faith that you will disclose these facts to the proper persons. Sincerely Jack Mayeaux SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW vvs APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE APP. HELD WITH: -- DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): /2 5--2 S. S. ed. !-(ALL BL,vO 7 7 CA j c2R FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): .2510.2 AC) DO/DO Case No.(s): � ������,, Other Case No.(s): Site Size: rlo�(iC/ 'Ath Receipt No.: n� Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Ji4Gk 1 1 AyEdI UX Application Accepted By: Address: /e2.__5.25 S.l.1J. 1-(A,1•1•,i3 Y1? Phone: L2o MgC. Date: City: G,A1ZD Zip: 722` Applicant*: IGUAf L CAIN D l W N IiDES Date Determined To Be Complete: • Address: 202..35 S.U• 130tirrA 1.2f Phone: 395151 City: / I Gi4 RD, CJIZ. Zip: 9 7241 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Rev.8/29/96 i:lcurp�nlrnasters�sdra.doc must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. I PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request Site ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): ❑ Application Form 52=2,a(> S6vRr.1 /407— spvG'LE ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization eZ,Et/4-L GO/sirrrEkC.li4 L !„l)m ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed S Ao�e oee ❑ Site/Plot Plan �C? � l�E� (#of copies based on pre-app check list) SvP4.147tZ c/CA/ ---�.L ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") I sq-17 ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999)....$1,600.00 (Si Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications_) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject Property, • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this °�aZ day of J e . 19 92 ?ad ur /Ow Sign e ( Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 e Department of Transportation •= !: RECEIVED District 2A :: IJregon District Permit Specialist John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor D E`_ 1 4 1998 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Ste.350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 (503)229-5002 SABRE CONS 7RUCTION FAX(503)297-6058 December 1, 1998 FILE CODE: tNE tg hway- Tigard OR 97224 Re: Approach Road Permit Hwy 141, M.P. 5.29 Washington County Dear Mr. Mayeaux: Enclosed please find an "Application and Permit to Construct an Approach Road on State Highway Right-of-Way ". (Please note this is an application, not a final permit). Please return the following items by mail or in person as we can not accept faxed signatures: • Signed and dated Application and Permit to Construct Approach Road (With signed page of provisions.) • Certificate of Endorsement of Insurance. The applicant or his contractor shall, during the period that an approach road is being constructed, file with the Division evidence of insurance in the following minimum amounts: $50,000 for property damage resulting from any single occurrence; and $100,000 for the death or injury of any person, subject to a limit of $500,000 for any single occurrence. Said policy or policies shall include as named insureds the State of Oregon, the Commission, the Department, its officers, agents and employees, except as to claims against the Department, or its officers, agents, and employees of damage to any of its or their property. A copy of the policy, or a certificate showing evidence of insurance, shall be filed with the Access and Utility Permit Unit, Room 82, 800 Airport Road, Salem OR 97310, prior to commencement of any work. Please have your insurer reference the job location on the certificate. • Bond in the amount specified on the permit ($2,000). Please contact our office at (503) 229-5002 x225 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane Estes Permit Specialist Form 734-1897C 01/97) oneyanosparrtnenrofTtaruporrar;on APPLICATION AND PERMIT TO , . 7r PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCT APPROACH ROAL HIGHWAY NAME MILE POINT ENGINEERS STATION Beaverton - Tualatin Highway 5.29 117+00 HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY SIDE OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE 141 Washington III NORTH ❑EAST Retail Shop I l SOUTH X wfsr _ p BETWEEN OR NEAR REFERENCE MAP NUMBERS TAX LOT NUMBER South of Scoffin Road 27V-26, Sheet 4A 00100 - APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REQUIRED REFERENCE AMOUNT OF BOND X YES[1]NO OAR 734-50-025(6) $2,000 INSURANCE REQUIRED REFERENCE X ADMINISTRATIVE FEE rghway X YES❑NO OAR 734-50-025(3) ❑ TEMPORARY DEPOSIT Tigard Or 97224 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER $50.00 4554 DISTRICT MANAGER OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE APPLICATION APPROVED TELEPHONE NUMBER: -620-46 X APPL/CAN7 APPLICATION DATE APPROACH ROAD COMPLETION REFERENCE:OAR 734-50-050(4) 8/1/99 X The apps:-ant ele<:'arc s the 1 hc.'s.`.c is the owr.er or lessee of the oaf property erlioinino he above de.rribed.highway.and ho:the h vful authority to?pply for this permit. When this application is approved by the Department of Transportation,the applicant is subject to the terms and provisions contained herein and attached hereto;and the terms of Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 734,Division 50, which is by this reference made a part of this permit. Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Manager's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowledged comprehensive plan for the area.Permits are issued subject to the approval of city,county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of zoning and/or building regulations.It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approval including, where applicable,local government determination of compliance with the statewide planning goals. (OAR 734-50-055) SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1--- If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and/or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. The original application must be signed by the local government official. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL SIGNATURE TITLE DATE X 2---Within 48 hours before beginning work and after completing the permit work, the applicant or his contractor shall notify the District Representative at telephone number: 229-5002 Or FAX number: 297-6058 3 - Permit valid only with attached page of provisions. 4 -Applicant shall construct curb and sidewalk at existing driveway to match existing curb and sidewalk. TYPE 4 APPROACH ROAD - CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE:All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the current State of Oregon Standard Specifications for Highway Construction Drwy I w = 26' wt 32' x = 4 K = 6' I I ANGLE OF SKEW APPROACH TYPE CURB TYPE R/W Line---\ I t I 90 A C i A� �\\ 1 / \ NOTES: W= WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY —yi W \ r �B ( _ K= DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK \ PRESENT OR FUTURE WALK OR 10 FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS i e � i j #C'LConc Curb-) A .1 �C $ W t SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE PLAN X= SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE 734-3307E(8-96) SEE PAGE 2 OF APPLICATION INSURANCE CERTIFIC -ION • APPROACH ROAD, UTILITY OR MISCLL.LANEOUS PERMITS FILE WITH: ACCESS AND UTILITY PERMITS 800 AIRPORT RD SALEM OREGON 97310 TELE: (503) 986-3031, FAX (503) 986-3032 THE OF hereby certifies that such insurance policies as are indicated hereunder have been issued and are in full force and effect on the effective date of this certificate and the additional insured and notice of cancellation provisions listed below have been endorsed into the policies. Name of Insured Address of Insured POLICY POLICY TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE LIMITS* (MMnnYY) - IMMDDYY1 GENERAL LIABILITY ROD,,v INJURY occ. I I COMPREHENSIVE FORM BODILY INJURY AGG. I PREMISES/OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE OCC. UNDERGROUND EXPLOSION PROPERTY DAMAGE AGG. I I AND COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPER. BI&PD COMBINED OCC. L]CONTRACTUAL Bl&PD COMBINED AGG. 1 I INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS PERSONAL INJURY AGG. BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE I I PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY (PER PERSON) ]ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (PRIV. PASS.) )PER ACCIDENT) I ALL OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (OTHER THAN PRIV. PASS.) BODILY INJURY AND I HIRED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE I NON OWNED AUTOS COMBINED I GARAGE LIABILITY EXCES::LIABILITY EACH OCCURENCE I UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE I OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM * MINIMUM LIMITS: BODILY INJURY $200,000 PER PERSON, $500,000 EACH OCCURENCE PROPERTY DAMAGE $50,000 EACH OCCURENCE, OR $500,000 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT The State of Oregon, its Department of Transportation, its Divisions, Officersand employees are hereby included as an additional insured in the herein numbered policy or policies as to the operations of the named insured under any pipe, pole, conduit, approach road or miscellaneous permit issued by the Department of Transportation, but only with respect to the insured(s) activities to be performed under permit. There shall be no cancellation, material change or intent not to renew the insurance coverage listed above without 30 days written notice from the insurers) to the Access and utility Permit Unit, Room 82, 800 Airport Rd., Salem Or. 97310. Any failure to comply with the reporting provision of this insurance shall not affect coverage(s)provided to the State of Oregon, the Oregon Department of Transportation, Its Division, Officers and employees. INSURANCE COMPANY OR AGENCY ADDRESS TELEPHONE 734-1852(12-96) • _NERAL PROVISIONS FOR ROAD APPt. ,CH POLELINE, PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS —tae-{ ayeei Hwy 141 M.P. 5.29 WORKSITE 1. Applicant must call for utility locates before digging (1-800-332-2344). You may be held liable for damages. 51 2. Applicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site. They shall be available to the District Maintenance manager or representative at their request. El 3. The permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. gl 4. The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean up shall be at the applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each workday, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. CA 5. All damaged or removed highway signs snail be repiaced by the applicant. installation shall be according tc MUTCD standards or District Manager's specification, and shall be completed as soon as possible, no later than the end of the work shift. 1 6. The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. TRAFFIC 7) 7. The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. All traffic control devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. 71 8. Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each phase of the work, showing signs and cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative in advance of construction or maintenance. a 9. No work will be permitted on the roadway during hours of darkness nor between 6-9 am or 3-6 pm unless prior authorization received from the District Manager or his representative. CONSTRUCTION 10. All rock shall be from an ODOT Certified material source. All work shall comply with the approved plans and specifications. Any work not in compliance shall be replaced, removed, or repaired to meet the satisfaction of the District Manager or his representative. APPLICANT ODOT REP DATE • • • . TABLE A NOTE s.:.bI.A"fog lE•.nno - K - 4,0.0.:°0.1000.0 �Enffe.°FyC DRIVEWAYS w ■ -576-16To s..sarletrp , G...Er....� -- 117 1 La w.,n h., �0e1p11 J ( TYPE A TYPE A-I - - - 15 * --TS I i A tr.acwb -Tvro C not PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE ASPHALT CONCRETE 'Wren v...,.. 14 17 17 17 17 - 16_ 3 19 19 n 19 �. B -_� 8 SECTION C-C _ FOR DRIVEWAYS IA 21 21 21 21 . ; ° ' I� (5:t s.r1`A)0 TYRE• OR •-1 Y Slop..er,MN 20 23 23 123 23 Ve T. ISM msY1 A)--� A+pr,Cant Nwr u.g W/ace 22 27__26 129 30 N a 1--• Convene c..b i Cl.st W10,x at w.cn..e 21 29 30 I.S...:)2 1,___,"'y 2 i ConcreN curb TMn.2-7 26 • 11 32 ITI J! NJ Canc..t•co.p J AJ --./'\ u S-.0 26 ss_ 34 35 ,36 HALF PLAN e 6aR Pahe 30 35 36�S7 36 I,Ile. Nom Cemp 1000 6' • 32 ••1 •211. •6 B Undo,.slope f SECTION A-A SECTION A-A 6 4 iF - -+-- Top of ceereh .. A. W,_J root "L•Y41 _J_ 34 5 43 I♦• 46- •aB cw0 .5,,61:,-,3-- --:, -�' r rt-_ 1 A 4 r 1 E Slew raaW• \ 5bq r R -� GENERAL NOTES FOR DRIVEWAYS HAL F ELEVATION C� T""" .... -�=+ INSERT A I Wdtn of d,w.eylWle•.no.v.on pans O a �M,n.mum e6a.0ble e« 4..°c•e SECTION B-B SECTION B-8 4.100090 WWII on nee• 2 IT a we 4.1.0ce from foot 00 cwt.N eon of .I.rf 11 .bMe b,n.ayt proton,w foTOr..alt a 10 het,.M Top of*went. v _ e.srance a lest b a -Reverse corns 3 When 46006 w,reNy a m woe CaW,lan. .u` -1 • r-♦ W- I 0aN1,w1 Only a 110.1)Of 10000.°h.wfalOti0r1 1 1 I 1 corwctbn..,h 00.wort. ., T -" C1 •"Alternate Apron Slop.'w.4 only Where pans 40 9noN 1000 mpl. 0.10 On(M)surfs. E.o . 6011•,;0•_J `3"t Red Type AIM)0 Type A-1(M). HALF ELEVATION 5 Ir...,0.00,0.•of asphalt*0.01011 One stone (ALTERNATE APRON ION base were sham en pans SLOPE) CONCRETE CURBS MONOLITHIC CURB 8 GUTTER ) 601.116 odpoon,pow 601t.r 16 Ty surf 1 1"E.DOM.an)ant Isle 7R\I W Slep.(LSIwp.°I1b Onl p7"n N' + o p°. ))Tat of Curb •1` w l •Rr0.4 lor'�.o All 6.106.o+lo.TYPE A tiA T _ TNS pw,an t0 M removed // ,n ••COpl a sheen ' Surf of pov i C."!Im. 0010.1..0_.40 of cur � I' .N - AC pm 'till Al pvpr - j_.7 5100.n0rm°t106u1Nr 5.36'hm ba..3''O-to 3,6-cc l:Y ate a t �� AC par 1 : a•pav NT.-.. r.► ,1410*pa. •a Oa M.10,10.c• au'•e. �e;4-�• __ `Qi ec+base•,Don red. % (-..: R I.��� (Bottom°I<tab •� 1 qs-2 •16 40..1 bey '!'j SIM 1 B crows Rod base, -�•nn.I...at Rock bas.,whn red opus po Io�nl 011 expansion rooms Fed TYPE 1a 4 w TYPE B 1 CURB ENDING DETAIL Ilya Y0C Ac Per.n.1 For AC,.lard,n IFw Type C,D,D'L8 E Curb) TYPE A AC Par.me n. 7p Fw•e Pavement TYPE A-I Few Carne peviment i •4 vl°f 1' of c r� �R v I Cur}of Ei par jiL Es - pe r. E=I �Or 41 n pa. Led AC per TYPE C TYPE D TYPE D-I TYPE E G•n.rel poop...cob For Cons Powm°n, F.Coe Pavement For AC Rer.m•nl SIDEWALK RAMP of ih ,1«16 56 4R D,al.an of coarse A II X-so.a. T pled surface __ _ M11' can* q1 d F,rol owl of pav MIX, finish t1� - sworn'ran rte° aa�„ pOV I( 1'-rFJ}. reswree '�3 ow po:1,w a a�.c1Ied Y wt 6 m�4CW l 3 1010*M toyer .pop. n i•IStIn6r.t, :.'.noun 'cc �e O. 41140..1.3'4 TYPE F-I PLAN Remy surfer-mg N be son. TYPE F es walk er Mt..' Fee AC.10.41 an Cent Pavement For AC 06• an Caw Pavement an°6°n°'• purpose 5' ©4.00,,06, I SI Cur 00.13711.06l muff Curb-1_. 60Ner r.- }q GENERAL NOTES FOR CONCRETE CURBS g I�, T )•IO"d0.°N qW/ :.ii..16 I Curb Ea C ter brM.ey. - s•3'cc Ys R1'� 0.001 Curl o/per pMwe"E"•7'00.10°1 Vary es sn°.0°n plena w es Affected '0 be full.,dfn �� -- .M.. w"ar.s ELEVATION SECTION A-A _ 2 F n normal es shown fee curb type. Very es 44.10 On plans Exatm.AC P.O Cues ache. 3 NirM"leverbRN es show on pans or es 6irect.4 TYPE G 4 .3L§pip Eapons.0.,200.1www um end•II pawls of tangency, Fw AC•+lend on AC Pavement Canlre*I..n,IS'In.)... 5 JfgpgtoQm shell 1m freed In*0...11011 curbs of 4,11...0...00.we. 1 E.(E 05 the total w,,0a1 4,m°nswn of*else Curb sarfoces ho,.06 (LOp.l■d.np a.1Opo OI 1:1 w s1Mp..1 M.n,mom seesaw.Iraosil.on Nngth 60011 pen W 20/.O<h 1"41.1/.10..4 sn E" .9'se. F•a Mec al pa - �ip.swfMrn/ 6ICwbt•,411•16"004061 Vary as.hewn an pone w M OuKted .here...haled h AC per 7 T4at^f,011 e0rbs eMll MOW toward the toed.*0.02'enema)unless Olhww s•allow or as Affected 6 1",)2.e11.All i'0,length as 00.n 10 not.cant 060101 u1 dowels before TYPE G-I commie hwd.ns In••..top con<pow'?41,11 h0°s Ir•one grown For AC..4.4 on AC Pew 1010, dowels m In AC 00001 dr..clowns ...«,f i —..�`'""'r�Nr"'q!"r!"r"rr"'a"v� yr .a 'r i:�t'.K 'bt'.,.-.• T ? H "� IWQFiJGARD ' . r A 1 `rr+s �_'.".w.4~`fi 4` "-... v,.", 1M.!.ais 3 ARE= PILIOAF 0 ICON • -RENC NOTES:r4t 34 L."'�/'e?•,� om,kz. 'R[_ .. . ,....r.:.f.:2.2 .1....„ -j [Pre Appliatlon eetiing'No a are Va id for S.ix�(61 Months)° -`�. NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 2 IfI _ STAFF AT PRE-APP.: k ILL ti i APPLICANT: WO CANIS.. 1 c AGENT: i Phone:I I G :t—56 l Phone: I l PROPERTY LOCATION: -ADDRESSIGEN.LOCATION: 22 5 - kt � ��� . a Ste.( cox.Q// 4 1 1 TAX MAP[SI/LOT#[SI: --t,.p ` 5.ec"czxc L,J/ NECESSARY APPLICATIONISI: 1 1 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: c c'- A ozo k 496 c'___ cit4 sKc\c) c- SC- C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: COAL (S..)s:N - k sTe_kor ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: G i C.I.T.AREA: �'a. i i\ FACILITATOR: S L- r� `N Ne r PHONE: [5031 ''`` ''`I `kwt"' i 1 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ea ' 1°Q-, Titibt MINIMUM LOT SIZE: N - sq. ft. Average lot width: Ni/4 ft. Maximum building height: 402 ft. setbacks Front t,f/�A ft. Side Nip., ft. Rear tv(A ft. Comer A1/A ft. from street. %. I sew MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: g5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: �� /o. °x`1'6 d (Refer to Code Section 18. I \—AUDTTIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet u -- • is created through the minor land partition process. Los created as part of a partitio• - ust have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15- fo t wide access easeme• . T e DEPTH OF A OTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2; T MES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the arcel is Ies .n 1 times the minimum lot size of the a plicable zoning dist ' . —h [Ref•r to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots] CITY OF TIGARU Pro-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 10 MONaesllentlal OAallcatlen/Msaala0 OINsIaa Section ■ SPECIAL SETBACKS t At>- STREETS: L feet from the centerline of CAM &V . C feet-#rom • . . •. it'sbeun a � (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (y) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ' ^ 'efer to Code Section 1:.' :.l i PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: - � S .yes ((f) Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): I Z SECONDARY USE REQUIRE Viking:------ Parking SHOWN. e Iminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. • Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included a landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. _Befect de Section 18.106.020] Handicapped Parkin : ➢ All par ing areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parki g spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the America s with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking spa, e symbol shall be painted on the .. ..•. space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ ;.cit •- - E REQUIRED 'OR MULTI-FAMILY, • MERCI • • ► D_IN I°L ID V 0 NTS. Bicycle racks s•all be located in areas • • -- -• rom automobile traffi a d in convenient locations. Bicycle ..rking spaces •. •e provided on the basis of one space. •r every fifteen (15) required vehicula .: g spaces. Minimum number of accesses: I Minimum access width: . Minimum pavement width: Gvd:6 All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: '//fir [Re Ma_Code Section-18186 and-181081— - CRY OF TICARD Pre-Anofccatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 MANIuIN.atlal Aaallcatl.a/Plaaalaa•Msl.■Sactl•■ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18108.QM01 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS ery COMM : - = • - INDUSTRIAL BUILDING I XCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET 1Lbe . : •••-d with a loading space. The space size an location shall proved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-0001.____ ____ CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.1021 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. Meter to Code Chapter 18.100) 2-0' LA"( ^ `Q- "` The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ►!� ? feet along north boundary. /01 °"+4aU 6(v4 feet along ast boundary. 7 feet along south boundary. Asdr, ? feet along west boundary. IN A DITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ,■ 1 LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parkin. areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raise. planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.100.1810Dand18.108L CITY OF TICAED Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 81 11 11111-Iasllaatlal AqucatlaaRlsaala,IMslea Soctloa —_ \ SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code tio Secn 181141—— SENSITIVE LANDS The Cod ' es TIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR LOPMENT DUE T AREAS WITHIN T 90-YEAR -LOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON •'ES IN EXCESS CF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt • preliminary identify sens' ive lands areas at the pre- application conference bas:d on available information. HOWEVER, he responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands ar:as, and their boundaries, is the respon- bility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions • sensitive lands must be clearly indica •d on plans submitted with the development application Chapter 18.84 also p-•vides regulations for the use, protectio', or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTI a DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WIT IN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Cod Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP :LOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted whi. addresses the approval standards of the ' igard Community Development Code Section 18.8..040.B. The report shall be based upon field e •Ioration and investigation and shall include sp- ific recommendations for achieving the requl :• ents of 18.84.040.B.2 and 18.84.040.:.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE ,GENCY[USAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DE ELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Cr eria: The VEGE 'TED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MIN 11 ► •F 2 - EET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined-bo _ndar'- • - - -nsitive area, except where appro . sas been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is gr. ted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface ater in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 fee wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3. .4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or p •ject site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corri••r shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, garden:, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities sh. be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated •orridor, except as allowed below: > A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EX • EDING 8 FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corrido must be widened by the width to th- •. . I paved or gravel walkway or bike path may n• be constructed closer th. o eet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless appr. ed by the Agency or . Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize •isturbance to - .'. ' g vegetation; and CITY Of TICARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 e11• MOM♦asldaatlal Ajillcatle.J?1aaalag OMslaa So Woe ➢ WATER QUALITY F ILITIES may encroach into the vege. :d corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of th or 1 . Location of Vegeta ed Corridor: IN ANY S DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHIC CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for crate ownership, such as a subdivision, th vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate ct, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Resign for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OV RLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended o resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams a d riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, t is chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). hese provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and prote ted. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of m• e than 1000 cfs. Ma'or Streams: Streams whic are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Majo streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FO•K AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND : •LL-CREE . Minor Strea s: Streams whi • are NOT "- '-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, ed Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PA ALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF A SSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. // L • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN ETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25(foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adoptednd administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.85.010) CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 sill NON-(esldeatlel MalIcatlea/Plaaelaa IMslea Sectlaa Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious su. - _- : - :• ise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for id-• ' '- major stream res• ices is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhance.. - of riparian vegetation in prese ed portions of the riparian setback area. Eli.ibili for Riparian Setback in Disturbed a reas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SE 'BACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on t - Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species curre y cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy current covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been re -oved from the on-site riparian setback area for the last fiv- ➢ That vegetation was 'of removed contrary to the provisions o _ - on 18.85.050 regulating removal of native pla t species; That there will be no fringement into the ear floodplain; and The average slope of the •- area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.100) 7 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS P A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 — CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appucatlan Conference Motes Page 6 of 11 MUM-lala■tl.!p.nc.a•dn.■■I i DM:(..Sidles MITIGATION — . --rk Ck' , REPLACEMENT OF A 1 HEE shall take place according to the following guidelines: > A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(DI iii, ,1, - The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable '. approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay revie e• the proposal. fer-to�ede Section18.321 �� :r' CODE SECTIONS s._ 18.80 _ 18.92 V 18.102 i 18.116 ✓ 18.150 _ 18.84 / 18.96 v 18.106 18.120 18.160 _ 18.85 / 18.98 / 18.108 18.130 18.162 ii _ 18.88 / 18.100 .V 18.114 _ 18.134 18.164 PACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.050) CITY OF TICARO Pre-AppfIcatloa Conference Notes Page 1010 111111-Iasldeatlal&aa(lcitlaaRlsaalaa NMiloa S.ctloa WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout —s-4QQ SUBDMSIO, 'LAT NAME RESERVATION P' OR TO SUBMITTIN - UBDIVISION LAND U APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, •.pplicant's are re. ' -. to complete and file a subdivisio plat naming request with the Washington County Su : •• s Office in order to obtain approva reservation for any subdivision n.••-. •• '¢: 'ons will not be accepted as complete until th City receives the faxes -: irmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Resery ion. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS 1 OBTAINED.) ---- — ---- -- ------- RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.1161 CITY OFTIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 010 NON-ioslduatlal I nolla leaRlasale0 OM:loo Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMN, is (rt.�'r cs`,. n Gil/ ✓crt/ . p r f'1 wa✓, Q 7L„k r / L./ 11 ) 7N .L) a 1 10. • 5.-2A7 d PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11"_map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard N. cot ,u,aJ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 0(11 RiNlisidsutlslllsallatlss1Plualag IM Lou Ssctloa PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE (5031639-4171 FAX (503)684-7297 E-MAIL (staff's first name)@CLtigard.or.uS UsOl.Matrilia ster1Unapi-c.sst anglaeertat Sadist:masts jrsapp-c.eaal OYdat1d 26alav-U CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 Gill NON4esldsatlal OMslaa Sectios CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A APPLICATION CHECKLIST .01.1%.1.. CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Mik Date: ((2-ct/ .3 [�APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./MARKED ITEMS 1I A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed caf D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies I E) Filing Fee �u $ II SITE-SPECIFIC MAPS)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./MARKED ITEMS II A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies cv 1. Vicinity map 0" 2. Site size & dimensions U, 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds II 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ®, (a) Floodplain areas (b) Slopes in excess of 25% e, (c) Unstable ground (d) Areas with high seasonal water table o' (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential (1) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: d (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands EV 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level o- 8. Location of existing structures and their uses t" 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources t2' 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways Er LAND USE APPLICATION.LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development An Indicating: No. of Copies _ I 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties [a' 2. Contour line intervals a' 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties d (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ca/ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ca' 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site e (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area Err (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas o� (f) Above ground utilities t" 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site d (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 1/ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped d 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques r3 10. The location of mailboxes 11 . The location of all structures and their orientation r2( 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements GI/ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies ( The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios C2' (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) Q' (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development d 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ca- (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals o' (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated e' LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 Ern D) Architectural Ora! .s Indicating: No. of Copies _ I g -• The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1 1? The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable e' 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings a{ 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces e( 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials a 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions d (b) Erosion control measures that will be used (2' F) Sign Drawings: or Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. K G) Traffic Generation Estimate: z Q. k,+�j LY ( Qii5T— ❑ H) Preliminary Pa • ion/Lot Li e Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1. T• - owner of the su•jest parcel ❑ 2. he owner's authorzed agent . ❑ . The map scale (21,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of p.rcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, widt and names of streets, easements and other public ways within . d adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of . I permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property Ii -s 7. Location a d width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location -•f any trees within 6" or greater cali.- at 4 feet above ground I vel • 9. All slops greater than 25% ❑ 10. Locatio of existing utilities a ■ tility easements ❑ 11. For majtr land partition . ich creates a public street: (a) The .ropos-. t-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve rip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PAGE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Prelim -y Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Sc. - equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one • ase per sheet ❑ . The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showi► g property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresse: and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surve er and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lin •s of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of a•jacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour I-nes related to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10°° grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The pur.ose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjace t to the proposed subdivision): (a) •ublic and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) 'ublic and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Ap.roximate plan and profiles of proposed sap' - a _ •• storm sewers wit grades and pipe sizes indicat-• • t e plans ❑ 11 . Plan •f the proposed wa - •'stribution system, showing pipe sizes and the lo . .•• • . •es and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished gr..e of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance b: and the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-w.y(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation er storm water overflow ❑ 1 5. Location, width & direction of flow of all w.•-r courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approxi ate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be use. or purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon uch lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a dia. eter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and t - location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the prope , including the location of all structures and the present uses of the s uctures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental informatio including: (a) Proposed deed re rictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed pla for provision of subdivision improv ments ❑ 20. Existing natural feature- including rock outcroppings, w ds & marsh areas ❑ 21 . If any of the foregoin6 information cannot pr ac be shown on the preliminary plat, it sl\ II be incorporated-into a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LANG USE APPLICATION 1 UST PACE 4 OF 5 • J) Solar Access Calculations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:UoginrpattyMastersV-Ckli imst May 23,1995 LAND USE APPLICATION J LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 PRE-A LICATION CONFERENCEIOTES ENGINEERING SECTION Q mumnityDevelopment Shaping 'A Better Cot[ hity PUBLIC FACILITIES -2-St OZ AP -4f low The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( vJ k-� to Ar-' feet from centerline. (FrzV--- CD3-1- Rc ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( 1)4X-1-"`_ street improvements be necessary along to include: (S .ucT oi)13-T- `e,A)� [�' C � 77( Scot_ � . feet of pavement CZT Say` .{`''`'PtDm ) [concrete curb [acT, ZZq/ C2—storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk [street trees R4treet signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Eogloeering Department Section ( ) strer' 'mprovements will be necessary alo. to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -fo concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, tra c control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other undergro•nd utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, street •hts and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necess. along to include: Cl feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb • ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year stre-tlight fee. (t,)7 Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW S(-°rI►�S Sr. AJa g—vD • Prior to oc-c'.( , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section In some cases, where stre ' improvements or other necessary r "lic improvements are not currently practical, the improvemer. ,lay be deferred. In such cases, ondition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) Sc,o�Ti,J S�cR —t (2.) Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Cool-c-w tJc- J NAL4>i Nl� -� . Water Supply: The C«y - Phone:(503) (-°7)`t- 411( provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. rr A Du‘,,,4,4 , ,po5 A-4 c> A szc,e_pn APPeo✓"— ∎r+ - Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant CITY OF i16AR0 Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Eiglneering Department Section to pay a fee in-lieu of cons`- 'cting an on-site facility provided sp7, 'ific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determini, 'hether or not the fee in-lieu will b eyed. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require. ( tY Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. ) Ccri s b15 tox'rN CO- A cs�-RaL. • c s[ ANY) AAPQ-.v A4..1 Ac.cE SS o r—To VI) . Ob3T WILL_ �c ./ 0.:t s. /au_:ss ,ate AC.c_e-c nl5 . • Swfi S Ac�""5 1S I•51- S•a,( -rtttS T�I�E (o}__ h ..S '(o t.■.r KG- sAfe- -R tr'�•t� �41 spa S -r Dt›TA1' J 1'5 A 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. CITY OF T1CARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section Compliance Agreer �t (CAP). This permit covers mor Iensive work such as main utility line extensions, sti improvements, etc. In subdivision:., this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 EegMewls,Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS F"Q SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects si._.. require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: -T-- . q‘2-`1 ENGINEERING DE TMENT TAFF Phone: [5031 639-4111 Fax: [5031684-1291 hApatty\masters\prea pp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 01-Sept-98 • • CITY OFTIGARD Pro-Applcatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Eilleeerlas Ieparboset Seetles CITY OF TIGARD AOkk LAND USE APPLICATIONS AA-4 City of Tigard. Oregon FEE SCHEDULE PROCEDURE (Page,of 2) FEE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE $ 80 APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission $ 250 > Hearing Referee $ 500 > Planning Commission/Hearing's Officer to City Council $1,745 + Transcript APPROVAL EXTENSION $ 150 BLASTING PERMITS S 145 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING • Text Only, Map Only, or Both $ 4,015 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW $ 1,615 DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVISION REVIEW > Single-Family Building Plan $ 40 Commercial/Industrial/Institution $ 250 EXPEDITED REVIEW Land Partition • S 1,280 > Subdivision $2,625 + S10/Lot HEARING POSTPONEMENT - $ 115 HISTORIC REVIEW/OVERLAY DISTRICT $ 2,190 HOME OCCUPATION (Type t:) $ 30 Original Permit (Type II:) S 255 INTERPRETATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE By the Community Development Department S 340 LAND PARTITION • Residential and Non-Residential $ 780 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ 270 MINOR MODIFICATION TO APPROVED PLAN S 100 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Conceptual Plan Review S 2,170 Detailed Plan Review S 510 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE FEE S 240 SENSITIVE LANDS • Administrative S 745 Hearings Officer S 1,240 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS S 690 SIGN PERMIT • 0-24 sq.ft./24-100 sq.ft./100 + sq.ft. (No Size Dfferential)S 50 Temporary Signs (Per Sign) 5 15 PROCEDURE (Page 2ot2) FEE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $100,000 $ 800 $100,000-999,999 $ 1,600 $1 Million/Over $1,780 + $5/$10,000 SUBDIVISION Preliminary Plat $2,125 + $ 10/Lot Final Plat $ 295 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision $ 315 Special Exemption/Non-Profit _0 TREE REMOVAL $ 160 VACATIONS Streets and Public Access $1530 Deposit + VARIANCE Actual Costs Charged Administrative $ 545 Flexible Setback $ 390 Hearing's Officer S 535 Sign Code S 535 Subdivision $ 505 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS* $ 1,160 ZONE CHANGE ZONING ANALYSIS (Detailed) $ 1,505 ZONING INQUIRY LETTER (Simple) $ 150 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT $ 50 $ 1,415 100'/e of Highest Planning Fee JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE + 20% Of All Additional Fees Related To The Proposal. EFFECTIVE 7/1/96 (Resolution No. 96-30, Repealing Resolution No 91-01) * - Indicates that the current City policy is to waive the City's application processing fee h'pattyVnasterslpingfees mst 07/17/96 11 47 AM f Meets n S <: >:.>:>::>:: <:::>::><::<z<:.; ;::>: : r 1998 Pi's Apps (CD 9 ) • September S M T W T F S ' .....:.:::......;:. 1 2 3 4 5 . 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 '' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .� >:< 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 2 6 > 27 28 29 30 "rtledaY Se tember9 '# 8:00 8:30 t t I 18-f:9fl0 2S1 a9AQ 0790 9:00 , ,:; �ii........ 9:30 Pasquale Pasciti,:639 $891 10:00 Installation of pnvate sewer Una; `� 40250 SW North Dakota 10:30 11:00 Michael Candianides 91705 SW Pacific Hwy- uperior ign ?"'`> 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 • 5:30 6:00 3:59PM Monday,September,21,1998 • :1I .1 September 21, 1998 // SABRE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NARRATIVE We are proposing a 5,175 square foot building located at 12525 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon. This proposed building will be the new home of Superior Signs a manufacture of commercial signs. Superior signs is currently located at 11705 S.W. Pacific Hwy., Tigard, Oregon This site is flat in topography, and has existing sanitary service. The current owner of this site is Mr. Jack Mayeaux, Phone# 503-620-3686 The applicant for this pre-application conference is: Michael Candianides Building Consultant Sabre Construction Company. !7 7235 SW Bonita Road /'?� C PI5 s Tigard, Oregon 97224 �, S-67 632s-15- 1 iy 7235 SW Bonita Road • Tigard, OR 97224 • P.O. Box 231026 • Portland, OR 97281 • Telephone 503/639-5151 • Fax 503/620-6005 INFONET Map Page 1 of 1 On Click r Zoom In r Zoom Out (: Pan r Identify Taxlot View: I.mr 5 ����m-�� Environment Environmental �� ��.,M� Elm EN MEiCE11 '� MI- IN moo Planning F Taxlot5 ���i_�` �� ��Min # ` p .:tric t s Streets i�•�� �' =M m Emergency F Street Names l sr mo ati r Nil Transport •Contours FFLE GonIJVJ' id1 E Wetlands 4 r Air Photos 111 E USGS Quad ..,.i .3u. ...f.., 3.i.Su .../esrimap.dll?name=IMSInfonet&Cmd=Identify&Parcels=Parcels&Streetm=Streetm&Enviroth 9/28/98 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE CHECKLIST "Vl City of Tigard 1. Applications should be received preferably, a minimum of one week prior to scheduling on the Pre-App calendar (with exceptions, as approved, by Mark or Will). 2. The application is usually a plan (2 copies) and should contain the following information: ,/ A. Name, address, and telephone number of the applicant and agent if applicable. B. Site plan showing the proposed lot and/or building layout, drawn to scale. The location of the property in relation to the nearest street(s), location(s) of driveway(s) on the property and across the street are helpful in providing a more accurate assessment of issues. C. The proposed use(s). D. Tax Map(s) and Lot Number(s). E. Current owner of the property, if not the applicant. F. Topographic information with contour lines if possible. G. If the pre-application conference is for a monopole project, the applicant must attach a copy and proof with an affadavit of mailing that the Co-location letter Protocol was completed. NOTE: If the above criteria is addressed, then a pre-application conference can be scheduled within 1-2 weeks on a Tuesday or Thursday morning, between the hours of 9:00-11:00, on a first come, first served basis. EFFECTIVE 7/1196: $240.00 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE FEE i:\curpinldick'preapp.chl 05/28/96 11:32:05 AM �A . ..•..= �1 �- •NCO Mi��O.• Ril-41 w1•' - (<YM /ry �rrn.o....�IW..is Y.n.... lOus(.0.. A - MC�v R 0 �V�LT' * 11uI 1MeM lM Ml ,Y/� fit! 1:30 �0 N�dld JIIS aI al Hnnvi 'o sINN3a �� *• N003H0 'OWJLL OAlB 11411 'M's S:LSL t In t� SNOIS �101�l3df1S dOHS NOIS �' CY z ►- Cr 0 •an18 11VH 'MS z • n PLO• .ti eC• ---------- ro -----------°� - __ •vr I ` *4 S 1 `\ 1 .• t %%7 I a Z CC Q / Z / Q N a- / Z / W / O I • :.. ::r : �> G:•:f };{t;:•}:; '::;b:r:'•':''fi:�5. M +g ti' �{7 :•: ii: l i i: : v:w-: / O U } ' rr .'+: :•r00 v %:::• ::••'•}} r••' y,}ti:;.•„•ri:}fi,;i; •' r, /„„..../ . ' iir }•:}: ,::{{::v 2 {v:. ::::•$:{;•;.•.•r•.••ov.ti :{vi r, '. ` ` 4 M;Y..: r•r✓. ;/ {% {+{. i} r 4,✓ h rq: :i{r.:•∎∎:4:: }\}.•Y v::.:•. / -•:•';:'i: ;::;::. '.::''v /::{�Y• v \ Y ' •{: : {C•}.s,,�\.' \{.•n••• L: ' : :•:r . r • • r/ te•> .�r7:e!• fi,.� �zs,: .[•e s\: . / f . e '{ , \ N %'Iff///r {/ /4/11":;:4r.✓{:•:/K r:::}f •:i'• � ;::•�' 1 f { l i rr, .}' • i ;1 r i !r ! r fr.. f f!` „. edit'{:;':•:` i *$•::;;•:_• •/h{....\`{:.`ti.• .:: 3 ;f::!/f: •r • � : ',•#-.0.4/4•4,•••:toe*r r:'°,.f r.. }••r :r' :- I i::::ffi }+.'+ {•}.�✓,•%'; .+'� \ :-.2.::-:.:,../y.,2%-{ r{r/' � / . :r• •ri::•}Y r4•r.:::0.,r.•}•:-:•: ,i• ;4••••••:. •;iJ.•;i:�%/./i r „/%�• i�/1 {� . {• f p.:* r :•}• > :may.:•.: a• /�r�,.r'�%r�l�;r.i��f / fj /rr • •� ✓i,:‘,„•.-7.,•/•:,„• f�'}� {':::^'/.;•{ter,. ??e�{rr t' i:.-:•:,:,/:.r .1..::/7/r}. rye :. •r.fr'. .O.:,$.rig8ri:};:: / I ..,::: :-::•.,.•x• f4,: ~}K' {;:ti r,}i}'�••••tr'ryr`/tir::,rrlr::fii '1 - a ::::::•:::::::t::::.:....x..‹.`0;.::•••:::,•v,•• y. . 1.r y....c,%';.-}l If1f'72:.:f; I n L+-- .::.}; \.}L:: 1 •ti4 ti• 'C�.%:• ••. a .'..''•:•:• :v:r v{:d.:}+:•:+'. 1!I�/r ... `\ '•tip..�� ••k ��'�,::• .��\\ \�'{• 1� •�'.+•+•' ! r. :.r'•i v.x->:.X:�:;.}ti.\:•�:,.1 k,2 \ti}:;1\ti ':••:".:§§ rz fr •••rry.: +. Ji.; :{. :.:::: .% %\: Nk ° t�'':••r;7• , f• v {7:{{ {•;••i,r••,{'fa*f :.:::::::: ::::::;C::•ti e 4 . : })' {}�r; & IM,:;••r'•'::•;°`•.::•!t,'. : +,::�:ti'}ti:✓ti::•:: \, •r: •: 1 r J j r r r %f ti; ; `^y 1 ,•};> �• ; f� fi�� } • � r f r rff { ti •iy y;tr ' 44 �+''• �.• M \ 4D : f, r.r f.r •:: .:.: .. r+ : ::ko{ ,;. .; k:::$0 .". / / /{: r+::�li r rr:.•rf•y:•••.•:'•::.r:v.;•••✓,�•• ':I'r,.;.i:}:•:•:rr::.'•. �j'.�j� f�fvf,{•fj+r�i,J,{.• 'rtr*'•;1l:;;:j,:;f }i.,��.r,i,•.: : {. •'� ff{j/ .ei{rfrri/%' ,:::r AV ?.. '�►:,::,:ili}'{;•},,�� : / . /,) :'}' 'Y:} Ff{:ff Sf r jv.{f?{ti;:;., :f:;'y link`is:.41::'}+{;:.r} :{r`:s• x. ,f{ , } +.. }jr:.{•r.r :•.:v.•::.••:.:.f:.•.\ •.+:.:•.•.;.}{•:.:::::::•:;•.••v{.•:ti:•'•}'{::.r:, / C\d„„‘ J l rr.r r{f :} v f r v: f:}�.':•,'f?r r f.�}:i.. ' .;;.,o,.;,•,,.;.�k:yo: /• / ./rX/r ":4.�f rr�Y.✓ .::.*:��•+.rr-. +; ' •fi i}f}oi.:•_:• i::`vs:ti.• / / O I 3.O P1a• ,and M� n . . lv '4Z (V 1 ■ o PO QC �r 4 4. i/11. :''' t....! k • ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS SpR99-crwc3 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). t Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 8. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages and at completion of the construction. Prior to the final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. Unless otherwise noted, the Staff contact for the following conditions will be Doris Michael, Planning Division 503-639-4171 x317. kir, 10. Provide a revised parking plan that shows the pedestrian accessway connecting the main walkway in front of the retail building to the public sidewalk being a minimum of 4 feet wide. kir11. The applicant shall submit a revised plan that shows the location of the service facilities such as the gas meter and air conditioner, and demonstrate compliance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. TO BC. v;E -iFiED Ciy /.;.Q.: IvAM:�'-A 1— SAS . 112. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing a minimum 3-foot space for the street trees (minus the parking overhang area). The proposed Goldenrain tree at the corner of SW Hall and SW Scoffins Street shall be replaced with a smaller tree and moved to the west if the utility line is not undergrounded. The plan shall note that the Flame Maple trees shall be pruned to be a tree. ki13. The site plan shall indicate the type and size of the fence that shall be located and maintained along the west property line. 14. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and detailed trash enclosure design to the A l Franchise Hauler for review and approval. The plans shall be of sufficient detail for the Franchise Hauler to determine that the applicable design and access standards are met. The site plan shall show a new location for the trash enclosure (not off SW Scoffins) and that the storage container gate will be made of solid wood, not chain link with slats as proposed. ATCACHMENii As15. The applicant shall submit a revised vehicle-parking plan showing that the proposed parking space dimension (length) complies with the City standard. 16. A detailed bicycle parking design shall be provided demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 18.765.050.C. and that the proposed bicycle parking design would accommodate 6 spaces for a 5,197 square foot building (or 7 spaces for a 6,139 • square foot building). 1 SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 27 SDR 99-0003 r .S 4(e wA y 01/.14 02 1'/).side setts? - t-,4 /w4j b- Or ODvr digs/?&,7 .5;41-v5 -♦decd 7� � rh�� i rt 1%4 • Ai 17. The applicant shall address the parking needs for the 942 square foot storage area by one the following ways: (a) Submit a revised parking plan adding 3 parking spaces; (b) Revise the building plans to eliminate the 942 square foot storage area; or (c) Obtain a parking reduction to reduce the off-street parking requirement. • 18. Submit a revised site plan retaining the 2 trees over 26 inches in caliper noted on the rif proposed plan. submit an arborist report explaining what tree protection measures should be taken to ensure that they are not damaged during construction. 'Submit a revised landscape plan indicating the size of all of the trees that will be retained so Staff can determine if a tree protection plan and deed restriction are needed. If for some reason the 2 trees mentioned above must be removed, the applicant shall submit a tree mitigation plan. The plan shall show how the 56 inches will be provided on-site, off-site, or payment with a fee in-lieu. The proposed mitigation plan must be approved prior to issuance of the building permit; however, actual mitigation is not required to be complete until the occupancy stage. l 19. Submit an arborist report indicating what measures will be taken to ensure that the oak tree located south of the subject parcel will not be impacted by project design. a 20. A lighting plan shall be provided for review and approval by the Tigard Police Department. Staff Contact: Jim Wolfe, Police Department (503-639-4171 x220). 21. Submit a revised site plan relocating the driveway along the south property line as requested by ODOT. ATTACH 1`'1EAJ 4 22. The applicant shall take Tri-Met's recommendation into consideration to place the building along SW Hall when revising the project to comply with the various • requirements. 23. Submit a revised site plan showing the location of wheel stops or that the pavement will be 4 inches tall to prevent vehicles from overhanging more than 3 feet into the landscape islands. 24. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant shall address the Building Division Ci, comments about the catchbasin design and the need for 2 hydrants. Staff Contact: Robert Poskin (503-639-4171 x392). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL - ,j BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: 25. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 26. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Scoffins Street or SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. This fee also only applies to the frontage , from where service is obtained for this site. If the fee option is chosen, the amounts for the 2 frontages will be as follows: SW Scoffins Street $3,988 r SW Hall Boulevard $3,850 The applicant must clearly show on their plans which street frontage will provide the electrical, phone and cable services so the proper fee can be assessed. The fee shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. SUPERIOR SIGNS BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 27 SOR 99-0003 i 1 - I° S.W. SGOVf(1-15 S^(". 1-(,)111.11.1111.111.1mum"."......11111.1.1.11.11.11..751"."1111mini..7 .. 1 l h I 5i(,O s.g. � � �� _ " _ � ,o, i ' q . 1 0 ,li ea ii1 4 srisic4ov," r 1 ._ __ _ _ _ _____:d.. 14 .4 - ' �j1151 U " 1`. . \ . 1 J 1310_ Sw, 11 t 4r, / ,b5t - „.,,, ,e,......,..„. . _ ,, ---,..„., i suc-rfm %et,5 --,L g, ...........................„ / 44.1 . 4 . 23 .c 1 1f-__ iitu, /9y (� 1 t D1 C- - -Pv r `f Sv1-1.0 t use- n5 UT o( s-iy3 P Stn�2_ I I S no4 a_ }fie-t r ltLpd l`Se p0 Z�,r•� _ .D o-e--d 4-4(-S r\--F---1- lie h-•c....LLL b cc trr- kJ, 0-4.1-EA -n b( cc ct/DP.e / • Dv kn S r 5b� gq-000 Attn: Richard Bewersdorff Please review this proposed parking plan and building location for Superior Sign, prior to our completion of the permit set and call with comments. Dennis Lauck 279-8124 'S/f7/ 9�j rt-h-e et-Q c-C. A. c• cJ' EE.r.AI-4- C-44 f ri r W c Vb eC L-0-4_4.4..4.4.4,_ 1 �.e.ti.1 r Qja.�,t,c .� + n L L.t Q t b 04- ) 6 LA--r —l` r( 4*0 S kp c..J 44 .t u. �- ` CL-f-e-r• r 4(C.., c c °14V /'-4 4t_ w- G-c t��s� t �-C... ' 7 -�- -A o S/ [a/ 99 ce `C_r - rt.e r c( m e r. Cr i vr. v c{ a , L. 411 /I c rw w•s• r+• � 1/' S.W. SCOFFINS S . PROJECT DATA �`�� 4� .,.I. OCCUPANCY Y. S I t r 4, ,4 ,,; .7 - CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-N / ti b 4 NON-SPRINKLERED 1,I� _-/_. \ BIILDNO I61OM AV 2 STORY I ' �.- - '1� BULDINO ARlA!FIRST PLR./ 5,250 S.F I�`•� . --- eROIN •IANEnra IRS e. D .t' ff A.C.PAVNO AREA 5,510 5F. . g a a 1i CONC.WALK AREA 506 SF ` � LANDSCAPE AREA '•e N d TOTAL LLOefYNU a,ea 61 C ... Y OMYWG I.MOlGMLO P. .n .r u Are.2.105 9.F.115.011 .I�/G SITE AREA 11,056 S.F. r,l�, 1�' cacuyx I f DoRlo1 � :, j RE 01:1 PARICMIO .s�,aw. 55.0 SPACES $ I 1• 4 (J PARKING PROVIDED u SPACES :111 f� . Q s Mil Mir PARKING > it r, m i 1„ J I I "kr m.� .,1�r.. 4� .III LIS KM IllibiTh ‘ in Y ' sr r... — -- -- PARKI •t :I:I:! 7�////��������.�����/ `` r 8 � �� ,IILS/.ura\\ + � I} , • 4. w. . �e sr Kilk __ ___°ate ��1►�/� ��►.4. vl.wap,,.,- j \ 1 rte• r-r_ \ ` 174, 1 ' 0 a. SITE �1�1 \ / \ ���� _ ;47'gV a...a& / aye°" 1/ I i �= �a Nil °V.; 'V , "/'f, „PA' NG // �_�i • 44°5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Sg�\ < / e ; . > a9 1-0..70 7 l 1 F MA.,,�,... 'yam 1 // J 5.a" ae lem..0 I S!:1a+ \\ '-�� 44,1,fr, NORTH v. p VICINITY MAP p SITE PLAN 4610:* ' .11, ve•.r-0• 5-13-99 illar SPR`?9-00003 'i C Pride Disposal Co. . Fail( To: 0 /4- Cr.f. I/ l From: `�$�j ri Fast Date: 7 2.-L^ 9 Phone: Pages: • Attn: �jJ� Res �D �'t J l��'/. Jim,e-•( ❑ Urgent 0 For Review ❑ Please Comment /� /0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle :9 h r�-s LL 1)-C- ,jam .51.t) 1fi4- / Chi"- TELEPH ONE:(503)6/25-6177 FAX 0 (503)6254179 • •Comments: Lk.)ti.1-14 avi 54 fr,J c-14"-Lei et.-5 S 4-0 L' `I .JZ.�+ I it t (/ •• £2 3")J 'g. I / —1---.44 4A-3" (.. 014-- ) it 1'1- I. • ...� ,...'._... __ ..-----_-. ANYLII:A I IUIV•HIVU rttlIVII 1 iI U _ PERMIT NUMBER 7 CONSTRUCT APPROACH ROAD 2AA35497 . . . HIGHWAY NAME MILE POINT ENGINEERS STATION Beaverton-Tualatin High wa y / 5.29 117+00 ..HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY SIDE OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE 141 , Washington n SOUTH F WEST Retail Shop BETWEEN OR NEAR REFERENCE MAP NUMBERS TAX LOT NUMBER South of Scoffin road 27V-26 Sheet 4A 00100 APPUCANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REQUIRED REFERENCE AMOUNT OF BOND T 2 YES❑NO OAR 734-50-025(61 2,000.00 INSURANCE REQUIRED REFERENCE Brent Hislop 2 AOM4NS77L1 T7VE FEE A 11705 SW Pacific Hwy N YES❑NO OAR 734.60-025(3) ❑ TEMPORARY DEPOSIT Tigard OR 97224 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER 50.00 DISTRICT MA GER OR REPRESENTATIVE ,/ DA7T.APPUC 1770N n APPROVED TELEPHONE NUMBER: 598-0839 X //// s�—1 7--� APPUCA770N DATE APPROACH ROAD COMP 0� 3 // C ci I REFERENCE OAR 7 0-050(al 9-10-99 X T he t dec/ar t he/she is the owner of lessee of the real property adjoining the above described highway and has the lawful authority to apply for this permit.When this appication is approved by the Department of Transportation,the appir-ant Is subject to the terms and p vvislons contained herein and attached hereto;and the terms of Oregon Administrative Rule,Chapter 734,Division 50,which is by this reference mode•part of this permit.Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Manager's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations Is not•finding al compiance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowiedgod comprehensive plan for the area.Permits ant issued subject to the approval of dry,county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of toning and/or bulking reguh.dons.It shag be the applicant's responrbJty to obtain any such approval Including,where appicable,local government determination of compEance with the statewide planning goals.(OAR 734-50-0551 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1—If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and/or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. The original application must be signed by the local government official. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL SIGNATURE TITLE DATE X i 2—Within 48 hours before beginning work and after completing the permit work, the applicant or his contractor shall notify the District Representative at telephone number: 503-229-5002 x225 Or FAX number: 503-297-6058 3. Permit valid only with attached pages of provisions flO 4. Applicant shall construct curb and sidewalk to match existing curb and sidewalk. • TYPE 4 APPROACH ROAD -CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE:All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the current State of Oregon Standard Specifications for Highway Construction 1 Drwy. 1 W = 26' W, 32' x = 4 K = 6' I I ANGLE OF SKEW APPROACH TYPE CURB TYPE R/W Llne -\ I I -_ 90 A C r A `\ / NOTES: W. WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY L8 W B�\\ Ot. < _ K= DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK oci r� � 2/ .:,..;:. . Q L . W PRESENT OR FUTURE WALK OR 10 FEET, __ P / I -� ' WHICHEVER IS LESS Cons Curb) 1♦ l A + ♦C W , SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE !_ ,i; ' PLAN X= SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE 734-3307E(8-961 SEE PAGE 2 OF APPLICATION 'i r. r9imprirri- • t. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR ROAD APPROACH POLELINE, PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS _,. EST SLQP Hwy 141 M.P. 5.29 • WORKSITE ® 1. Applicant must call for utility locates before digging (1-800-332-2344). You may be held liable for damages. 2. Applicant shall have a,copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site. They shall be available to the District Maintenance manager or representative at their request. m 3. The permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. 0 4. The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit Clean up shall be at the applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each workday, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. 5. All damaged or removed highway signs shall be replaced by the applicant. Installation shall be according to MUTCD standards or District.Manager's specification, and shall be completed as soon as possible, no later than the end of the work shift. 2.6. The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. TRAFFIC CO 7. The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. All traffic control devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. 14 8. Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan fcr each phase of the work, showing signs and,cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative in advance of construction or maintenance. gt 9. No work will be perr'nitted on the roadway during hours of darkness nor between 6-9 am or 3-6 pm unless prior authorization received from the District Manager or his representative. CONSTRUCTION C3 10. All rock shall be from an COOT Certified material source, 0_11, All work shall comply with the approved plans and specificat ons. Any work not in compliance shall be replaced, removed, or repaired to meet the satisfaction of the District Manager or his representative. ( APPLICANT .-,,� . i J (COOT REP 1—/7--C/ DATE °�°-`�''„'"""'"L' PERMIT PERFORMANCE BOND ?OND N0. 61007(11 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, S_ARRr roNSTRILCTION CDMPANY an individual corporation, whose address is: t. . p,-D •R •7 24 RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY Company, licensed to do • as Principal, and the. business in the State of Oregon, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Department of . Transportation, in the sum of e2 non (lc for which payment, well and truly to be . made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH WHEREAS, from time to time the Principal will be engaged in performing work authorized by permits issued by the Department of Transportation to perform certain grading, leveling, filling, drainage, paving, pipe line installation, and/or other types of work on highways rights of ways or property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation and in connection therewith must furnish a bond to the Department of Transportation. NOW THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall restore said highway right of way or property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation to a condition required by the Department of Transportation as specified in the permit under which the work is being performed, than this obligation is to be void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force . from nl/1 /qq until n-4/1 /nn IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set the Ptincipal's hand and seal_ and the surety has caused these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 15th day oMARCH /999 SABRE. t'-ONSTR(UCCTION COMPANY (PR/NC/PAL) BYY •' �`? ),_____ . pt•T TA1f' - ,"„7„,, m„.„ ISURETY) • BY �..4. A ilia% ADDRESS 1 • W1-W7S • ID : = PORT AND OR 97221 TELEPHONE ( 5n1 ) 292-16R7 7.14.;9119112-94J . THIS FORM IS VOID IF BACKGROUND IS NOT BLUE. • RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY 3 Parkway v 1 Reliance UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY Philadelphia, PA 19102 RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY (215)864-4000 18° RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and that RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,are corporations duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and that RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin(herein collectively called'the Companies")and that the Companies by virtue of signature and seals do hereby make, constitute and appoint Lynn Miller, Leah J. St. John, and Angle Thomas Individually of Portland, Oregon their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact,to make,execute,seal and deliver for and on their behalf,and as its act and deed,one of the following bonds: ADMINISTRATOR. EXECUTOR, PERSONAL REPRESENTATNE, COMMISSIONER, SALE OF REAL ESTATE, CONSERVATOR, COMMITTEE, GUARDIAN, TRUSTEE UNDER WILL,TRUSTEE OR RECEIVER IN BANKRUPTCY or RECEIVER IN STATE COURT in an amount not to exceed 31,000,000.00. ANY OTHER BOND OR UNDERTAKING OF SURETYSHIP in an amount not to exceed$100,000.00. ANY BOND OR INDEMNITY PROVIDED THAT WRITTEN AUTHORITY FROM AN OFFICER OF REUANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY AND/OR REUANCE SURETY COMPANY SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION ACCOMPANIES THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. and to bind the Companies thereby as full and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executive Officer of the Companies and sealed and attested by one other of such officers,and hereby ratifies and confirms all that their said Attomey(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Article VII of the By-Laws of RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY,RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY,UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY which provisions are in full force and effect,reading as follows: ARTICLE VII-EXECUTION OF BONDS AND UNDERTAKING 1. The Board of Directors,the President,the Chairman of the Board,any Senior Vice President,any Vice President or Assistant Vice President or other officer designated by the Board of Directors shall have power and authority to(a)appoint Attomey(s)-in-Fact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and(b)to remove any such Attomey(s)-in-Fact at any time and revoke the power and authority given to them. 2. Attomey(s)-in-Fact shall have power and authority,subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued to them,to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings,recognizances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings,recognizances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. 3. Attomey(s)-in-Fad shall have power and authority to execute affidavits required to be attached to bonds.recognizances,contracts of indemnity or other conditional or obligatory I! • undertakings and they shall also have power and authority to certify the financial statement of the Company and to copies of the By-Laws of the Company or any article or section thereof. This Power of Attorney is signed and seaied by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive and Finance Committees of the Boards of Directors of IIII� Reliance Insurance Company,United Pacific Insurance Company and Reliance National Indemnity Company by Unanimous Consent dated as of February 28,1994 and by the Executive • and Financial Committee of the Board of Directors of Reliance Surety Company by Unanimous Consent dated as of March 31,1994. 1111 "Resolved that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attomey or any certificates relating thereto by facsimile,and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such Power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached." IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Companies have caused these presents to be signed and by their corporate seals to be hereto affaed,this 6th day of May, 1994. / STATE OF Pennsylvania s`.�.L ' , +_ SIL t EaL�h COUNTY OF Philadelphia a.�% �.._.` ,�=y�/ far•"'.�i Vice President On this May 6,1994,before me,Rita M.Sambrick,personally appeared Charles B.Schmalz,who acknowledged himself to be the Executive Vice President of the RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY,and the Vice President of RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY,UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and that as such,being authorized to do so,executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained by signing the name of the corporation by himself as its duly authorized officer. My Commission Expires: NOTORIAL SEAL ` s A� m Rita M.Sabrick.Votary Public ( i :) May 22, 1399 oMy CmExes Ma999 Not Public in and for the State of Pennsylvania I, Anita Zippert, Secretary of the RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and/or RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Power of Attorney executed by RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and/or RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY,which is still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Company this day of • ...}}} S Secretary A July 30, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Michael Candianides OREGON Sabre Construction Co. PO Box 231026 Portland< OR 97281 RE: Plans Check Number: 6-73C & 6-72C This letter is to confirm receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the plans examiner. As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is/are: SDR1999-00003 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans are not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit will not be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and I will be happy to explain further. 1: 1(0/k/4 Bonnie Mulheam Development Services Technician cc: Building file cc: Planning Department cc: Engineering Department I:OSTSIBUPLUC.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 SABRE CONSTRUCTIOI OMPANY 1121171 CDF cfrE GMErfl0IrTML P.O. Box 231 026 PORTLAND, OREGON 97281 COB#32944 9/i3/9 . / (503) 639-5151 DATE `l Jos NO FAX (503)620-6005 ATT[NrioN TO 170 l'ILL. Ha....00 i(--- A[ i:r+-pC.rtOr Si6Ii C iri of 6Ae_D I RECEIVED S E P 1 1999 COMMUNITY ULVtLuriviENT WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans XSamples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE , DESCRIPTION / ( /2' `r) / Al / ( -/91 j _ /_I 4. L2-- / . 7 z4/y`) _ Pi% c AsPossL Ga. *f l en 11 Apio,eoAc i ,SAO /Oa"-riT' 1 .- 504- q? - 0903 Pages 3 4 4 n . 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval XFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS IMP / or C eu.1 Iffir I cns i f 1Q L C'` i/ OPFicE 639 -5/51 nice nioetz 307- 40 8-7-11.64441._ yam, COPY TO SIGNED: (061-11-L. eruitxx- If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us •at once. 09/17/99 10:48 To:'W'AYNE KOCt;Lc =r,; :Shauna Cedar - 625-9:2 l/. COVER Dat Time. Page: To: WAYNE KOONCE Company Sabre Construction Co Fax #: 620-6005 From. Shauna Title: Estimator Company. Cedar Landscape, Inc. Address: 14145 SW Galbreath Dr. Sherwood , OR 97140 USA Fax #: (503) 625-8622 Voice #: (503) 625-3700 Ext. 223 Message Re: Tree Mitigation Hi Wayne, Here is your adjusted cost to replace mitigation trees. (24) 1 .5" cal. trees $2,150.00. (35) 1 cal. trees $1 ,500.00. This price includes labor but is not a stand alone price or quote for installation. Please call me if you have any questions. Shauna JAN-12-00 WED 11 :50 AN Bud Snyder 503 590 4590 P. 01 T A X C O V E R S H E r FAX NO: ( ) 6,24---M7 DATE: / / /`a /ze? SHEET / OF 2 TO: Sz- v FROM: Bud Snyder 14460 S.W. 141st Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Phone: (503) 590-4590 5/€54/ Return FAX: (503) 590-4590 MESSAGE: Signed ORIGINAL DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED: .. n ...+ rsk Cant RRnlitar Mail f 1 Will be sent JAN-12-00 WED 11 :50 AM Bud Snyder 503 590 4590 P. 02 January 12, 2000 Gail and Bud Snyder 14460 S.W. 141st Avenue Tigard Oregon 97224 Sabre Construction Company 7235 S.W. Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97224 ATTN: Mike Candianides Wayne Koonce RE: Superior Sign Project at 12525 S.W. Hall, Tigard, OR. 97223 SUBJ: Demising Fence at West Property Line Gentlemen: The Owner of the residential properties adjoining the project west property line of the above project has reviewed your proposed demising fence for the common property line. Your faxsimile of the "Reed's Classic Fence" identifies an architecturally pleasing precast finish resembling brick or stone between precast posts with chinahat caps. We visited the inplace example of the installed fence at the Regency Apartments in Vancouver as discussed. .ONDITIQNAL APPROVAL:. The architectural finish side installed to face outwards to the west towards the residential property is approved for installation complete with chinahat caps on posts per your proposal. (The unfinished side of the fence is not acceptable to face west and is NOT approved.) Construction can proceed immediately conforming to these conditions. If there is any questions in this regard., please contact me, Bud Snyder, agent for the Owner, directly. I would like to be advised of installation date to oversee the work from the Owners perspective. Sincerely, Gail V. Snyanager cc: City of Tigard Planning, Julia Hajduk / Matt Scheidegger 10'-• A'-4• -- — ' $-r , 3,_e• •'-P. + . i , W.0' 14-0• 11'-i• , L e• S.W. SCOFFINS ST. N ° PROJECT DATA ': ZONING KBD S 88'38'28" W 126.35' 14.4. OCCUPANCY W, B - � � M 0104 illi,W) R =CONSTRUCTION TYPE Y-N } 2 3. 10 9 !�!`I NON-sPRMKLER0' IPA °i_i.�� 4.1 �. ��� BUILDING HEIGHT 2 STORY 1 20'-0' (`.�7_ ' r���l , ���` , �1��' R! Lee BULDWG AREA (FIRST FLR) 5,250 S.F. eewa�rLOa■reroRAr,EJ RSV er. a A.C. PAYING AREA 5,905 S.F. I~ OiL L1 z �� •• CONC. WALK AREA 506 S.F. I 0 g f LANDSCAPE AREA v e'I I III (n d TOTAL LA DICAPRG 2494 eF. LANDecAPfD PANXIIO RD St. 3 CAR OV£i64NY �.' (f I GONG.WALK Tl'T'. 2,121 SF. (15.021 1l§.� I • F SITE AREA 14,097 S.F. I" Ex+eTIO eu7LDRO •�.� A�_� TO DE REr1ovED + I 't cow.WAuc LL O R LAI 1111 EO PARKING SF/104,0x2,51. 15.9 SPACES I —I IA i :s PARKING PROVIDED 16 SPACES 0 A I In Fa, (�,i,O•.%e a • V4• GHAIYiE 1"- PARKING I '- > ii Z 1 IW .E�DCs ENTRANCE6 ��� pi 1i" AGPAVWCs,I'M. I Qt I, W AlI�I Jill:1M" J P �1„ HOOF LINE VAN ACCtee�Lfl'Y eRSt 1I,/ CL 4� t 'T PANNED ACE6618tLITr `�� .I F _ !�,' EYFIDOLD rte o.TG �1 MAX SLOPE• a ' %,, i I7,n w 1 Ili ,......j DET.WARNING 4r \-•� \ \ - 'n,,, QLOPE -�• MI /mil • ff 2,•••••Im.m••■•=.6 iii::::::Iiir agr 4. MVP Q� CONC.WALK 'W \ _ , . \ \ PAI14TeD witty N0 IP •, -- WALK 87• \ / n,etcYCLE oETecrneLE Wa:r `�_ DET.NANkNCs tt. 8k, \„_ii 1\ ee RACK •amdvee r oa try. �' M1 Q. m C �� FliECA6T g' '440'4 CEDAR FtT10! ` \ \ / \ I: PAReGtNG N. EXNTND CONCReTe \ / \ J • CONS CID T U B Arerr.E 1a+oec'P Rx°ae S \ \ 7T \ \ JI Z i'HIGH 1`r`cI/ RErAWW[+u>,aLL 6'C.� \ p - _ _-- PANTED er�er� ` OD 11@ WILDING 0 6 ii'li �J �' 7 Ex j A_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION E ,,,,,,,,0„,„ ,, /� �' [gg N " i' l CITY OF TI6ARD `Jk d`J PA' ING TY7"•AC PAVRG PERIMETER • /• WASHINGTON COL TY,I:REGION J /4 tO / 4 El I TL 001007 e 1 E MAO / oilL _J NOTE: ALL WD10C ON THIS PF>OJECT SHALL COnP Y W TN 7994 UBL.UtI.C.4 UPG. ,b, ,<9 \ \ '1bJ 'I Div ~F m -S AND THE I'!9)NEC. 's• ••4 (1. �,A1-li• / `'`C //�\\ �7 �.\�,.. C� V REOUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ��'� '��r 4 • S ADAL IN E M I1eACCO ACCORDANCE TH EC FOI of THE ITEI■3 N I ALSO REWIRE `407' �, NORTH ereCML MMECTION M ACCOIWANCE WfT}1 SEC. 1101 Of M 111FORY B11L0■10 CODE Reoas ooieLwtc� rnlon To FanoATton■s�oTlou �► — A 1 CO STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER L600 re 111, , w ..�'_/. 0 RL°Vle®I-IO-00 VICINITY MAP Ell SITE PLAN V16,, . ,..mn �r— *wily 8 R EvISED II-20-Se 8-10-59