Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2013-00003
SDR2O13 - 00003 LACIE NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2013-00003 LACIE TIGARD 120 DAYS = 10/18/2013 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: LACIE CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2013-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant, LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building, exterior modifications of doors and windows, restriping and additional paving for parking,landscaping and a stormwater swale. APPLICANT: Ryan Schera Mackenzie 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland, OR 97214 OWNERS: Summit Properties Yoshio Kurosaki 5550 SW Macadam Suite 205 Portland, OR 97239 LOCATION: 7555 SW Tech Center Drive;WCTM 2S101DC,Tax Lot 04500. ZONE: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g.,restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor,vibration,are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 CRITERIA: SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for Site Development Review subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents NOTICE TYPE 11 DECISION SDR2013d01K113I \(;I1? V\GI{1()1.26 and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Any modification to the approved plan requires review and approval from the Planning Department. A minor or major modification application may be required. 2. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit an urban forestry inventory fee in the amount of $574.00. 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review and approval that shows the following: A. Wheel stops along the north perimeter of the parking lot. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit an erosion control plan for review and approval. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)". 5. Prior to site work, the applicant shall obtain a Clean Water Services (CWS) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 6. If applicable,a separate sign permit will be required for all tenant signage prior to installation. 7. The applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. 8. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant, in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code 11.04, shall obtain a Solid Waste Compactor permit. 9. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit a detailed plan for review and approval illustrating how the garbage collection area is screened in accordance with TDC 18.745.050E(4) and 18.755.050 (including location, fencing type,gate details, etc.). 10. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit documentation from Pride Disposal Service confirming their approval of the location of collection facilities and compatibility with their waste collection practices. NOTICP.TYPE 11 DR(:ISION SDR21113-I0003 LACIE P.AGI:2 OF 26 11. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contact the Staff Planner, Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be completed per approved plans. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 12. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit an access report in accordance with 18.705.030.H which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, geometric standards, sight distance, deceleration standards, and any other applicable standards as set by ODOT,Washington County, the City and AASHTO. 13. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide detailed information demonstrating compliance with the runoff storage requirements of 18.818.100.D and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services,if necessary) approval of these facilities. 14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall obtain approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant placement. 15. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide detailed information and maintenance plans demonstrating compliance with the storm water quality requirements of the City of Tigard and Clean Water Services and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services, if necessary) approval of these facilities. 16. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control,particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as appropriate. 17. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard for any aspects of the proposed development that would increase water usage or otherwise affect the water system and/or sewer system. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Vicinity& Site Information: The 5.01 acre site is located on the north side of SW Tech Center Drive, bound by the railroad to the west. The site is zoned Industrial Park (I-P), as are the properties to the east and west and Light Industrial (I-L) to the south. The properties to the north are zoned Low Density Residential (R 3.5). The site is currently developed with a large industrial building and associated parking lot. Properties in the area are developed with large buildings and associated parking lots used for industrial type businesses and single family homes to the north. Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and did not find a record of the original NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR21113-1xri103 LACIE PAGE 3 OF 26 site development review. There have been various building, mechanical plumbing and fire suppression permits for minor construction. In 2012 (MIS2012-00002), a determination of nonconforming use was issued for Blue Bird Transfer, a warehouse/freight movement use. No other permits were found for this property. Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant, LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building, exterior modifications of doors and windows,restriping and additional paving for parking, landscaping and a stormwater swale. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The City of Tigard sent notification of the proposal to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site and invited them to provide written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. On July 7, 2013, the city received an email from Mr. Pat Hermanson expressing concern about the invasive ivy growing and spreading from the project property. The email was referred to the City's Code Enforcement Officer and the applicant. No other public comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts B. Specific Site Development Review Approval Criteria 18.360 C. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 (Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.780 (Signs) 18.790 (Urban Forestry Plan) 18.795 (Visual Clearance) D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P zoning district: Industrial Park. Development Standards: Section 18.530.040.B States that the development standards in Industrial Zoning Districts are contained in Table NO710E TMPE 11 DECISION SI)R2n13-I0Nx13 I.A(:11? 1'\GI•:4 01 26 18.530.2 below: TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P EXISTING and PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 5.01 acres Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. Approx.380 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 ft. 127 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[t1 20 ft. N/A -Side yard 0/50 ft.131 197/50 ft -Rear yard 0/50 ft.131 141 95 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting 0 ft. - a public or private street. - Maximum Height 45 ft. 30 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[�1 75%[5] 59% Minimum Landscape Requirement 25%[61 29% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6]Except that a reduction to 20°/.of the site may be approved through the site development review process. The site lies within the I-P zoning district. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the zone. The proposed use is a new light industrial use, LaCie; a company that produces various computer hardware. Light industrial uses are permitted in the zone. All activities are contained within buildings. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been fully satisfied. B. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The following sections were found not to apply to the proposal: 18.360.090.3 (Multi Family Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore,will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled); and 18.360.090.15 (All Provisions&Regulations of Underlying Zone Apply). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: N(YI1Cl?TYPE 11 DECISION SDR201 3-1 01 103 LA CIE PAGE 5 OF 26 Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The site is developed with a building and associated parking lot, no additions to the building are proposed. The building has significant setbacks from other properties which provide for adequate light, air circulation and fire-fighting. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. All existing trees were preserved and additional trees will be planted within the parking area. This standard is met. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard"Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; (4) Roof runoff controls; (5) Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; (6) Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; (7) Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. The applicant has considered innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat. The applicant's narrative states and site plan shows that the water quality will be handled with a low impact development approach (LIDA) swale and Stormfilter water quality catch basins. The swale will be located along the west edge of the proposed parking area and will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. This standard is met. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and these areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (1) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4)A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping. The applicant states that the site is clearly defined along the north, west and east property line by a combination of retaining walls, fencing and dense landscaping. The south property line, along SW Tech Center Drive, is defined by an elevation change from the street to the front of the building. There is a sidewalk and pedestrian walkway that leads from the front of the building to SW Tech Center Drive. The proposal includes enhancements to the site landscaping which will better define public and private areas. This standard is met. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of NOI1C1?IYPE II DECISION SDR2(113-00(X13 LACE; PAGE 6 01,26 seven feet,which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows exist and are proposed along the front of the building (south and east sides), which allows the occupants the ability to observe activities outside of the building. Mailboxes are currently located within a landscape island adjacent to a parking lot light pole. The narrative states that lighting is provided along the perimeter of the building that provides lighting for parking lots and pedestrian traffic areas that occur near the front of the building. Lighting is also located provided within the parking areas that overlap with the building lighting. This standard is met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The nearest transit facility is bus line #38, which runs on SW 72"d Ave, approximately 785 feet from the site. The nearest bus stop is located at SW Sandburg Road & SW 72nd Avenue, approximately 967 feet away from the site. The proposal was referred to TriMet for review and comment and no requests for additional transit facilities were received. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the Site Development Review criteria have been fully satisfied. C. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided a site plan showing two accesses from SW Tech Center Drive. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. There is no existing or proposed joint access. Therefore, this standard does not apply. N(Y17CI rvpii I1 DE(:1sI(>N SDII2l)13-IKKK)31.A(ali 1':\GE 7 01'26 Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The proposed building will be accessible from SW Tech Center Drive; a public street. Therefore, this standard is met. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; On-site pedestrian walkways are proposed from the building entrance to the parking area and public sidewalk. This standard is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; A walkway that crosses a vehicle access drive is proposed from the building to SW Tech Center Drive. The proposed walkway is 6 feet wide, approximately 26 feet long across the drive aisle and marked with striping. This standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The narrative states that the walkway will consist of a concrete sidewalk and the portion across the parking lot will be paved with asphalt and adequately striped to identify walkway location. The narrative and site plan shows lighting along the perimeter of the building and within the parking lot area that will light the walkway area across the parking lot to the sidewalk. This standard is met. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) NO'I1(;I•:'IYP1,11 DI;(7SlON SDR22013-4KkN13 L:1C1I 1'.A(;I?H OF 26 Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The development currently has two access locations on SW Tech Center Drive and no changes are proposed. The access on SW Tech Center Drive, a local street, requires a minimum sight distance of 125 feet in each direction. The sight distance between the two driveways is approximately 242 feet. To the east, the sight distance was measured to be approximately 51 feet to an existing driving on the adjacent parcel. The decision has been conditioned to submit an access report which verifies the design of driveways and streets meet all applicable standards. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The existing driveways will not be modified or affected. This standard does not apply. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.I provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Based on the 85 proposed parking spaces, one access point is required. The site currently has two access points,both fronting SW Tech Center Drive. The west access onto SW Tech Center Drive is approximately a 34-foot paved access drive. The east access is approximately a 32-foot paved access drive. Both vehicular access ways are within 50 feet of an entrance. The existing access drives are proposed to remain and no new access is proposed;therefore this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access, egress and circulation standards are not fully satisfied as proposed but can be met through the stated condition of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28- 070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use NO77CF.7\PIi 11 DI?C1SION SDR21113-IxNN131..AC11: I'.AGI:901 26 concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare,whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is light industrial which is an outright permitted use within the I-P zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the above, there is no evidence that the Environmental Performance Standards will not be satisfied. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (18.745): All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry standards. All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z-60, 1-2004, and any other future revisions). All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. Certificate of Occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 lists the following street tree standards: 1. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II), Planned Development (Type III), Site Development Review (Type II) and Subdivision (Type II and III) permits. 2. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result NO77CE 1YPI.11 DECISION S1Ra)13-I0$x 3 I,ACIE PAGE 10 01.26 is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. 3. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. 4. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. 5. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right of way whenever practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right of way according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right of way is not practicable. 6. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: a. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right of way immediately adjacent to the subject site; b. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the Street Tree Planting and Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and c. The tree is shown as preserved in the Tree Preservation and Removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), Tree Canopy Cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. 7. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the Director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the Urban Forestry Fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the City's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three (3) years (per the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual) for each tree below the minimum required. The site has approximately 370 feet of frontage along SW Tech Center Drive, which requires 9 street trees. The site plan shows six existing Red Maple street trees approximately 40 feet apart. Three additional Hedge Maples, listed as a medium stature street tree from the city's street tree list, are proposed for planting. This standard is met. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter. The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. The Director may approve an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards,provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. The site is surrounded by similar industrial uses to the south, east and west. The north perimeter of the site abuts a single family residential area and a Type E buffer is required. The applicant's narrative states that existing buffer area along the north property line varies from 21 feet to 41 feet in depth, with an average setback of 31 feet. The buffer consists of mature shrubs, approximately four rows of large mature trees, a retaining wall varying between 2 feet and 5 feet in height and a chain link fence atop. Staff conducted a site visit, and has determined that the existing buffer meets the intent and is equally effective as the standards in this chapter. This standard is met. Special Provision: Screening and Landscaping of Parking Areas NO"17(l:1YI'l II DE(:!SION S111213-0k3 1.ACIE PAGE 11OF26 Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the Parking Lot Tree Canopy Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. The site plan shows 21 trees, distributed throughout the parking lot, that provide direct canopy coverage. The parking lot and loading area is approximately 71,103 square feet and 21,471 (30.2%) square feet of canopy is provided. This standard is met. Screening Of Service Facilities Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The existing transformer is located on the ground on the south side of the building. The transformer is screened from the parking and street by an existing 5 foot hedge. All other mechanical equipment is located on the roof top and is setback from the edge, screening it from the street. This standard is met. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant indicates that the garbage and cardboard compactors will be placed in the back (north) of the building. The area will be screened by the building from the street and by the buffer along the north property line from the adjacent residential area. In discussions with the applicant, detailed drawings will be submitted for review and approval of the enclosure prior to fmal building inspection. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully satisfied but can be met as conditioned. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant stated that the site is currently served by Pride Disposal Service. The applicant provided an approval letter from Pride Disposal without an enclosure around the facilities. However, the decision will be conditioned to submit detailed drawings showing the site obscuring fence and documentation from the franchise regarding the compatibility of the on-site storage with the enclosure. This standard can be met as NO'FICF'IYVI?11 DECISION SDR2 I3-1MNM13 L:\CII: 1'.\GI:12 OF 26 conditioned. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant did not address the enclosure of the containers. Exterior storage areas are required to be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence. This decision is being conditioned to require that the applicant provide details on how this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards have not been fully satisfied, but can be with the stated conditions of approval. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 500 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces;4) Long-term spaces. According to measurements taken from the plans, the parking associated with this project is within 110 feet of the existing building. All parking has been proposed to be located on-site. Therefore, this standard is met. N(Y17CIi ME 11 DECISION SDR2 I3-000031.ACIF. P:1G1?1301.26 Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. The development has no shared parking. This standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The proposed building is not a mixed-use project. This standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long- term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The site plan shows a total of 85 parking spaces with 5 designated carpool/vanpool parking spaces and designated signage. This standard is met. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 ADA parking spaces, one of which must be van and wheelchair user only. Four spaces are provided. Final determination of the number and design of the N(VIVA 7YI'F 11 DECISION SDR21113-0ok03 LACIE PAGE 14 OF 26 required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. This standard is met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other bathers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). No drop-off grade separation is proposed. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The submitted plans show the parking spaces clearly marked with striping, and the direction of flow is obvious within the proposed parking area. Therefore, this standard is met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The site plan shows wheel stops adjacent to interior landscaped areas and sidewalks but not along the north perimeter of the parking lot. This decision is being conditioned to require that the applicant provide a revised site plan showing wheel stops along the north perimeter of the parking lot. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space No'n(:I; rypi,11 1)N.(:1SIUN SDR2013i s;1.-AC1H 1):AG1•:15 OF 26 and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. Stall width dimensions may be distributed as 50% standard spaces, 50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. The applicant's plans and narrative indicate that of the 85 parking spaces, none of the spaces are compact. Dimensions of the 90 degree parking spaces are 9 ft. by 18.5 ft. The drive aisle is two-way and has a width of 26 feet. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking is provided within 50 feet of the building entrance and is in a visible location. The designated bike parking areas will not be within parking aisles or pedestrian ways. This standard is met. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long- term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2'/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The site plan shows the location of the bicycle parking. The bicycle parking spaces will be steel loop racks, secured to the ground. The surface will be concrete. All spaces are uncovered and designed to meet the 2.5 feet x 6 feet requirements.This standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an industrial use is 0.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the square footage (48,812 square feet) of the building, 5 are required. The narrative states ten bicycle parking spaces are proposed. Therefore,this standard is met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Nona:'INPI:II DEE:(:ISION SDR2(113-(K10031..1C11? P:%(GE 16 0-26 Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. The minimum parking for General Industrial Uses is 1.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet. For the total square footage (48,812), 78 spaces are required. There is no maximum for industrial uses; therefore the maximum does not apply. The site plan shows 85 parking spaces. This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. This is an industrial development with existing off-street loading spaces. No additional square footage is proposed with this application; there for no additional loading spaces are required. This standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully satisfied as proposed but can be met through conditions of approval. SIGNS (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-P Zoning District. There are no proposed signs with this application. This section does not apply. If any signage is to be installed in the future,a sign permit is required. Urban Forestry Plan (18.790): Urban Forestry Plan Requirements (18.790.030) A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; An Urban Forestry Plan prepared/approved by a landscape architect has been provided. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM); The existing development site is being developed to accommodate a new light industrial use. A tree preservation and removal plan was submitted identifying all trees proposed for preservation and one for removal. The plan meets the tree preservation and removal standards; this standard is met. 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and A Tree Canopy Site Plan was provided that identifies the canopy of existing and newly planted open grown trees and three existing stands of trees. According to the supplemental report, no tree growth NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR22013-(Kp003LACIE P:\GE 17 01.26 limiting soils were found on the site; so no limiting soils are identified on the plan. The applicant's Urban Forestry Plan shows that the site meets the minimum effective canopy requirements. The project landscape architect has signed the Urban Forestry site plan and attested that the plan meets the tree canopy site plan standards. 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was prepared by the project landscape architect, Robin Laughlin; MacKenzie. The report includes the required inventory data for the existing open grown trees and the existing stands of trees (UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection D & E). Protection measures, consisting of a 5 foot metal fence secured to the ground located along the dripline of preserved trees shall be in place prior to any site work. Soil characteristics for the site are native soils that support the existing stands of primarily native trees and vegetation. The landscape architect states that soil samples will be taken in the newly planted areas and used to determine the proper balance of soil amendments. The table below demonstrates the effective tree canopy in accordance with UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection M). Because the site is zoned I-P, the required effective tree canopy is 33% for the entire site. According to the supplemental report, the effective canopy is as outlined below: Square feet of Canopy Percent of Canopy Existing canopy 104,704 48.0% Newly Planted Trees 29,603 13.6% TOTAL CANOPY FOR SITE 134,307 61.6% The required canopy for the entire site is met. B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. The site meets the canopy requirements;therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based upon the facts above, the Urban Forestry Plan requirements have been fully satisfied. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation (18.790.060) C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in Section 11,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The applicant's proposal does not address tree establishment. Therefore, a condition of approval is added for the applicant to provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11,Part 2. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree NO'1'ICI:'IYPI:II DECISION SI)R2(113-4XNX)31..1.(al? P\GF.18 OF 26 and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. There are six existing trees and three existing stands. The total tree inventory fee is $574.00 ($137 + $28(6) + $181 + $44 (2)). FINDING: Standards to implement the Urban Forestry Plan have not been fully satisfied but can be met as conditioned. VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's narrative does not address the visual clearance requirements, however, there are no • structures proposed within the visual clearance areas. The code requires vision clearance to be met at driveways; therefore the applicant must continue to comply with this standard in the future. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been fully satisfied. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810): Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E and Figure 18.810.1 require a 5- lane arterial to have right-of-way varying from 100 feet to 104 feet; a 3-lane collector to have right- of-way varying from 70 to 74 feet; and a local street to have a 54-foot right-of-way. Other improvements required include sidewalks, bike lanes if designated as bike routes, underground utilities, storm drainage,planter strips and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Tech Center Drive, which is classified as a local street on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan Map. SW Tech Center Drive is currently improved and consists of 50 feet of right-of-way, a paved width of 36 feet with two travel lanes. Currently, there is no sidewalk along the north side of SW Tech Center Drive NOTICE lIVI'.II DECISION SIR2013-11)0031.ACIE PAGE 19 OF 26 and ends at the railroad property to the west. There are no pedestrian trip generators to the west of the property; therefore, there is no need for a sidewalk or pedestrian facilitates. This standard is met. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de- sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. No future streets or extensions of streets are proposed. This standard does not apply. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. No future streets or extensions of streets are proposed. This standard does not apply. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. No cul-de-sacs are proposed. This standard does not apply. NO.11CI?7YI'F II DECISION SDR2013-00 k)3I..%CIE PAGE 20 OP 26 Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. No future streets or extensions of streets are proposed and current grades are less than 12%. This standard does not apply. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: ♦ Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or; ♦ For blocks adjacent to arterial streets,limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. ♦ For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. No new streets are proposed. This standard does not apply. Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.O50.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. No new parcels are being created. This standard does not apply. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. Currently, there is no sidewalk along the property frontage (north side) along SW Tech Center Drive; there is a sidewalk along the south side. SW Tech Center Drive ends at railroad property to the west and there are no pedestrian trip generators west of the property. Therefore, there is no need for a sidewalk or pedestrian facilitates. This standard is met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NO'I'ICI?'1iPl,11 DECISION SIR2013-000)31..ACIE P_AGI?21 OP 26 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The building is already served by sanitary sewer. All additional connections shall be in compliance with city standards. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no identified upstream drainage ways that need to be considered with this proposal. This standard does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In a June 12, 2013 letter from the applicant, on page 4 it states: "the proposed site improvements include an addition of approximately 3,800 square feet of new asphalt paving and redevelopment of 4,280 square feet of existing paving...stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new vegetated swale,which will provide water quality and flow control for the new paved area. The swale overflow will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. It appears the proposed stormwater system will meet the requirements. However, the decision is being conditioned to provide detailed information demonstrating compliance with the runoff storage requirements of I8.810.100D and to obtain city and Clean Water Services approval,if applicable. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. SW Tech Center Drive is not a bicycle facility. This standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during \Omi.:'nil'IIDIiCISION SDR013-0Mxu3LACII: P‘GE 22( 1.26 construction,high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: ♦ The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services ♦ The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and ♦ Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. The existing utilities along SW Tech Center Drive have already been placed underground. Any new utility connections shall be made underground. This standard is met. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: No traffic study is required with this development. Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for the fire and emergency services. The applicant must work with TVF&R to ensure the project complies with all TVF&R requirements, including access and hydrant placement. Public Water System: The City of Tigard is the water service provider in this area. The property already has existing water service. There are no water related improvements proposed for this project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of permits, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for the proposed water quality treatment that meets the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. NOTICE :11 DECISION SIR2013-lMu 3 I v:IE P.1(1E 21 OP 26 To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as appropriate. Survey Requirements: Applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390): Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact analysis addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The applicant's plans propose improvements or upgrades as needed to not have any adverse impact on the city infrastructure. Existing public sanitary sewer and water laterals will serve the site. There is no known deficiency in capacity. Since the site is an industrial development, there should be no impact on the City's parks system. NoI1(;E'1YPI.II DECISION SDR2013-01NN)3 LACIE PAGI'.24 01 26 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Public Works Department and City of Tigard Police Department have reviewed the proposal and had no objections. City of Tigard Design Review Engineer has reviewed the proposal and comments have been inserted into the decision. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. TVFR requests a hazardous material report of proposed products to be used and/or stored at the facility. Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and responded that a Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. These items will be reviewed during the city's site permit review. Century Link was sent a copy of the application and has responded that the project is outside of their service area. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 8, 2013 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 27,2013 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant,the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. NOTICE TYPE II DECISION SDR20I3-10 o3 LACIE PAGE 25 OF 26 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 4:00 PM ON AUGUST 26, 2013. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Community Development Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon at (503)718-2427. t `'61 August 8,2013 PREPARED BY: A ll es Kowacz DATE Associate Planner August 8..2013 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director myna::TYPE.H DECISION SDR2113-IkuJ31.A(:IE PAGE 26 OF 26 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Agnes Kowacz From: Albert Shields Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2013 3:10 PM To: Pat Hermanson Cc: Brad Hermanson;Agnes Kowacz;Tom McGuire Subject: RE: Case ID Number: SDR2013-00003 Mrs. Hermanson, thank you for your email about the ivy intruding onto your property. The Tigard Municipal Code identifies Hedera helix,commonly called English Ivy, as an invasive plant and prohibits planting it. However,that provision only went into effect in February, 2012, which means that ivy planted before February, 2012, is "grandfathered" in that it was legal to plant at the time it was planted. If it was legal at the time of planting we do not have a basis for now requiring it's removal or citing a property owner for allowing it to grow. Unfortunately, from your description I assume that the ivy on the parcel next to you was planted well before February, 2012, which would mean that the city does not have a basis for ordering its removal. I'm sorry to say that it appears that we cannot cite the property owner for a violation or order him to remove the ivy on his parcel, let alone yours. If, however, you can attest that the ivy was planted after February, 2012, we could consider the planting to be a violation of code and we could require its removal. If this is the case, please file a code compliance request by going to the city website via the following link: http://www.tiRard- or.gov/city hall/departments/cd/code compliance/default.asp. You mentioned that you have made efforts to spray the ivy but it continues to grow. I have been advised that the waxy coating on the mature ivy leaves protects the plant from most herbicide sprays and that an effective way to kill off ivy is to mow it, removing the shiny, mature leaves, and then spray it with a herbicide when new, uncoated leaves begin to grow. I hope this information proves helpful to you. Albert Shields Code Enforcement Officer Original Message From: Agnes Kowacz Sent: Monday,July 08, 2013 4:00 PM To: Albert Shields Cc: Brad Hermanson; Pat Hermanson Subject: RE: Case ID Number: SDR2013-00003 Albert- Please see the email below, thank you. Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 503.718.2427 1 agnesk@tigard-or.gov Original Message From: Pat Hermanson [mailto:pat.hermanson @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday,July 07, 2013 8:01 AM To:Agnes Kowacz Cc: Brad Hermanson Subject: Case ID Number: SDR2013-00003 I am in receipt of your "Notice of a Type II Proposal, Site Development Review, Case ID: SDR2013-00003." My property is directly behind Tax Lot 25101DC04500, as described in the notice. The previous tenant of the described property planted ivy on the embankment between our properties, and the ivy is now encroaching under the fence onto my lot and covers approximately 10-20 feet of my property. It is very fast growing, and though I have made efforts to spray the ivy, it is continuing to robustly grow. Something needs to be done ASAP to eradicate the ivy that is planted on the embankment behind my lot to prevent further invasion into my yard. I assume measures must be taken to kill the ivy that is growing on my property, as well as that planted on the embankment, since ivy tends to root itself as it grows. Could you please advise me what measures will be taken to destroy the ivy? I am sending a copy of this request to my son, Brad Hermanson, and would appreciate any response be directed to him as well. Thank you, Pat Hermanson 7530 SW Cherry Drive Tigard, OR 97223-8042 Telephone: (503)639-6245 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 • ' City of Tigard T I G A R D Memorandum To: Agnes Kovacz, Associate Planner From: Mike McCarthy, Senior Project Engineer Re: SDR 2013-03; LaCie Tenant Improvement; 7555 SW Tech Center Dr Date: August 6, 2013 Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.705.030.H Access Management Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. No driveway changes are proposed with the proposed site modifications. No issues or problems have been observed with the existing driveways and it appears they will adequately serve the proposed use. The proposed development would increase the amount of traffic using these accesses (relative to the previous use). Prior to final occupancy, the applicant shall submit an access report in accordance with 18.705.030.H which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, geometric standards, sight distance and deceleration standards, and any other applicable requirements as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. It appears that this standard can be met. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The current accesses to the site are outside of the current and anticipated future influence area of intersections. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No driveway connections to Arterials or Collectors are proposed. This standard is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.818.030.E, Tigard Municipal Code, requires a Local Commercial street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Tech Center Dr, which is classified as a Local Street on the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan and is within a commercial area. Tech Center Drive currently has a 36-foot paved width in a 50-foot right-of-way, and these widths meet the standards of 18.810.030.E. There is currently no sidewalk along the property frontage of Tech Center Dr. As Tech Center Dr enters railroad property just west of the subject property and there are no pedestrian trip generators or attractors west of the subject property, there is no need for sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities. This standard is met. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. Existing development of adjacent properties and the railroad preclude new street alignments and connections. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Existing development of adjacent properties and the railroad preclude new street alignments and connections. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing grades along Tech Center Dr are much less than 12%. No grade changes are proposed to Tech Center Dr. This standard is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non- access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The proposal does not include residential properties near an Arterial or Major Collector. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi- family residential developments. No private streets are proposed with this project. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Existing development of adjacent properties and the railroad preclude new street alignments and connections. Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. Existing development of adjacent properties and the railroad preclude new street or pedestrian/bicycle alignments and connections. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. There is currently no sidewalk along the property frontage of Tech Center Dr. There is an existing sidewalk along the south side of Tech Center Dr for most of the subject frontage. As Tech Center Dr enters railroad property just west of the subject property and there are no pedestrian trip generators or attractors west of the subject property, there is no need for sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities along the frontage of the subject property. This standard is met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Tigard provides sewer service in this area. The applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard for any aspects of the proposed development that would increase water usage or otherwise affect the sewer system, prior to final building inspection or occupancy. It appears that this standard can be met. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no identified upstream drainage ways that need to be considered with this proposal. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future revisions or amendments). On Page 4 of a clarification letter dated June 12, 2013, the applicant states: "The proposed site improvements include an addition of approximately 3,800 SF or new asphalt paving ... Stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new vegetated swale, which will provide water quality and flow control for the new paved area. It appears that the proposed stormwater system will meet these requirements. Prior to final occupancy, the applicant shall provide detailed information demonstrating compliance with the runoff storage requirements of 18.818.100.D and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services, if necessary) approval of these facilities. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. The existing utilities along Tech Center Dr have already been placed underground. This standard is met. Any new utility connections shall be made underground. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant placement prior to final occupancy. Public Water System: The City of Tigard provides water service in this area. The applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard for any aspects of the proposed development that would increase water usage or otherwise affect the water system, prior to final building inspection or occupancy. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on- site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. On Page 4 of a clarification letter dated June 12, 2013, the applicant states: "The proposed site improvements include an addition of approximately 3,800 SF or new asphalt paving, and redevelopment of approximately 4,280 SF of existing paving. The new asphalt paving will be located along the west side of the parking area, in an area that is currently covered with gravel surfacing. Stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new vegetated swale, which will provide water quality and flow control for the new paved area. The swale overflow will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. ... Water quality treatment for the re-developed paving areas and for the additional existing pavement requiring treatment will be provided in two storm filter water quality catch basins, which will be installed at the existing catch basin locations on-site." It appears that the proposed stormwater system will meet these requirements. Prior to final occupancy, the applicant shall provide detailed information and maintenance plans demonstrating compliance with the storm water quality requirements of the City of Tigard and Clean Water Services and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services, if necessary) approval of these facilities. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as appropriate. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. Address Assignments: This development is anticipated to use the existing site address. Survey Requirements The applicant's final drawings and as-builts shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). In addition, the applicant shall provide as-built drawings which shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION OR OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING BY THE NEW TENANT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem @tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: The applicant shall submit an access report in accordance with 18.705.030.H which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, geometric standards. sight distance, deceleration standards, and any other applicable standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. The applicant shall provide detailed information demonstrating compliance with the runoff storage requirements of 18.818.100.D and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services, if necessary) approval of these facilities. The existing utilities along Tech Center Dr have already been placed underground. Any new utility connections shall be made underground. The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant placement prior to final occupancy. The applicant shall provide detailed information and maintenance plans demonstrating compliance with the storm water quality requirements of the City of Tigard and Clean Water Services and have obtained city (and Clean Water Services, if necessary) approval of these facilities. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as appropriate. The applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard for any aspects of the proposed development that would increase water usage or otherwise affect the water system, prior to final building inspection or occupancy. The City Engineer may determine the necessity for, and require submittal and approval of, a construction access and parking plan for the building phase. If the City Engineer deems such a plan necessary, the applicant shall provide the plan prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall obtain approval from the City of Tigard for any aspects of the proposed development that would increase water usage or otherwise affect the sewer system, prior to final building inspection or occupancy. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the site permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." CleanWater Services MEMORANDUM Date: July 17, 2013 To: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys, lean Water Services(the District) Subject: LaCie, SDR 2013-00003,2S101DC04500 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services(the District)Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards,Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance,project will require a 1200-CN Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5,Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed,it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location,condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 5W Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District, prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue July 17, 2013 Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Re: LaCie Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal. If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504. Sincerely, &./45'.41( John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal Copy: TVFR File North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 7401 SW Washo Court 12400 SW Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 97007-1042 11945 SW 70`h Avenue Tualatin,Oregon 97062-8350 Sherwood,Oregon 97140-9734 503-259-1400 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 503-259-1500 503-259-1600 503-649-8577 Agnes Kowacz From: Wolff,John F. <John.Wolff @tvfr.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 17, 2013 4:31 PM To: Agnes Kowacz Cc: Dan Nelson Subject: LaCie Agnes, TVFR has no objections to the proposal submitted surrounding the LaCie modification. TVFR will need to have a hazardous material report of proposed products to be used and/or stored at the facility. John Wolff I Deputy Fire Marshal II Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue Direct: 503-259-1504 www.tvfr.com Agnes Kowacz From: Smith, Lynn <Lynn.Smith @CenturyLink.com> Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2013 2:23 PM To: Agnes Kowacz Subject: Request for response Good day, In response to your request for comment on the following project LaCie SDR 2013-00003 This location falls outside of the Qwest/Centurylink serving area, therefore we have no objection to this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond. Have a great day Lynn lognn M&nith C¢ntury-kink Right of Wag Managscr Orcgon and SW Washington 8021 SW Capitol 11111 Rd Portland,Or 97219 503-242-6376 Offie¢ 1 Agnes Kowacz From: Brian Rager Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:12 AM To: Agnes Kowacz Subject: SDR 2013-00003, LaCie Hi Agnes. PW does not have any objections to the application. Thanks for letting us take a look. Brian Rager Assistant Public Works Director City of Tigard I Public Works Department 503-718-2471 brianr @tgard-or.gov DISCLAIMER. E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 1111 z City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: l my 2,2013 TO: Jim Wolf, PD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email:agnesk(u,tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR) 2013-00003 - LaCie - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant,LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building,exterior modifications of man&overhead doors and windows,restriping and additional paving for parking,and a stormwater swale. LOCATION: The property is located at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive.The site is bounded by SW Tech Center Drive to the south and the railroad to the west,Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101DC,Tax Lot 04500.ZONE: I-P:The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing,office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g.,restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g.,noise,glare,odor,vibration,are permitted in the I-P zone.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360,Site Development Review;18.390, Procedures;18.530,Industrial Zoning Districts;18.705,Access Egress and Circulation;18.725,Environmental Performance Standards;18.745, Landscaping and Screening;18.755,Mixed Solid Waste;18.765,Off-Street Parking and Loading;18.775 Sensitive Lands;18.780,Signs;18.790, Urban Forestry Plan;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 17. 2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1Name & Number of Person(s)Commenting: 3. VJ01T 1 -2.5(o 1 • III n City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 2.2013 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agnesk@a,tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2013-00003 - LaCie - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant,LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building,exterior modifications of man&overhead doors and windows,restriping and additional paving for parking,and a stormwater swale. LOCATION: The property is located at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive.The site is bounded by SW Tech Center Drive to the south and the railroad to the west,Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 2S101DC,Tax Lot 04500. ZONE: I-P:The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing,office and small-scale commercial uses,e.g.,restaurants,personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts,e.g.,noise,glare,odor,vibration,are permitted in the I-P zone.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360,Site Development Review;18.390, Procedures;18.530,Industrial Zoning Districts;18.705,Access Egress and Circulation;18.725,Environmental Performance Standards;18.745, Landscaping and Screening;18.755,Mixed Solid Waste;18.765,Off-Street Parking and Loading;18.775 Sensitive Lands;18.780,Signs; 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 17, 2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. — Written comments provided below: IName &Number of Person(s) Commenting: I CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR C .NTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: SD Zl'71. -Gc- 3 FILE NAME: L1( i C CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Kenny Asher,CD Director DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ /Arborist _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Tom McGuire,Asst.CD Director - BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim WO,Crime Prevention Officer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. k PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director CITY ATORNEY _ %_ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Development Eng 'U _BLIC WORKS/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1 FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*)'TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE a _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* YCLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John Wolff,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170t Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program Beaverton,OR 97006 11945 SW 70th Ave Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Tigard OR 97223-9196 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS — Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(WLUN Foam Reguired) Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 — PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,o.i.Res000e Center(ZCA-Adopted) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Ony) _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Mapsa.cws Letter Only) _ 0.Gerald Uba,Ph.D.,(CPA/DCA/20N) Mara Ulloa(Comp Plan Amendments d Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G —CITY OF KING CITY* 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY * _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General Apps Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Brent Curtis(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Assessment&Taxation(TCA)MS e _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Dona Mateia.Cartography)ZCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(Vacations) 1900 SW 0 Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. —WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A * _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)"911"(sra.apa.Towers) Chad Gordon,AssistantDistnctManager (Notify 1 ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr crossing safety specialist (NOhty if Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St.NE.Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell, President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem.OR 97 301-52 94 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE CORP. TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction-Engineer COMMISSION(MACC) Gerald Backhaus s..Map t.,A,e.contan, (If Protect is Within'/.Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Fred Christ(Annexations only) 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland.OR 97232 /PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY . VERIZON CENTURYLINK Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. Right-of-Way Manager,OR&SW V Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland.OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 8021 SW Capitol Hill Road Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 ,- i,COMCAST CABLE CORP. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev (s..impi.,...00..di Brian Every(App.E arHa.or aaN) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPUANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN SOB'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/AU CM PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Besponsibk For Indicating Parties TO Notify). l:1CURPLN\Masters1Request for Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED Feb 25 2013) (If you update this roster also update I:ICURPLN1 Masters 1Request For Comments Notification labels.doc)(This document is password protected. Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates. Thank you.) MAILING RECORDS 6 V 'PI Notice of a Type II 'S.-)3L)9,41x Site Development Review c \PP T 1 G A R D Case ID: SDR2013-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Tuesday,July 02,2013 120 days = Friday,October :,2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427 agnesk @tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your writte. comments by 5 p.m. on Wednesday,July 17, 2013 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 S I Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SDR2013-00003. Please address yo . comments to the appropriate staff person: Agnes Kowacz. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a site development review to .dify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant,LaCie. Improvements include: interior rem• •el of existing building, exterior modifications of man & overhead doors and windows, striping and additional paving for parking, and a stormwater swale. Applicant: LaCie,LTD Melissa Cahill 22985 NW Evergreen Par.- ay Hillsboro,OR 97124 Owner 1: Summit Properties Yoshio Kurosaki 5550 SW Maca.,am,Suite 205 Portland,0' 7239 Proposal Address: 7555 S ech Center Drive Tigar, OR 97223 Legal T Lot 2S101DC04500 Description: Zoning: I-P: Industrial Park District Approval Crite' : TDC 18.360.050 What You 1 ould Snow About This Type II Proposal The p •posed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to ;.rticipate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open c• ent period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 /CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 ' Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee,Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/Ql Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 Site Map . ME' R t I p O 1 m .t o r s it O ^ I w O ' , , © L..T 1 I- /4 1 roun�esc + , ���O m r"0 Q �i. m o% p' Exuma C IAVEL° W LOT r ' ■l DD$TNG BL LDt Q ' ' '"f =Ir 4B2i ii , © iv 0 ge ILI _# � •tee: NV m gio 1. O a 0 7.. v,. . .. •4 \ , ' igiro'r* 4for 0r4 1 ii • I. Q ; • ' cress ea m o [MA d Fl-MI • tti 1 nr.ay \ o 1 0 '. '+,io _ it ■rrrr•' C---r , offr____1?-00— -_ 0 0 I _ A a7Jt �tu7�rrr,, t wttN R R o/�I• cc�' Cc oAr �,•1 K CLIMB i -ft.Um N M1 ©sue PLAN OS t ,� WILE r.x City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/Ql Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 Zoning Map Nisi -- YARNS • Zoning Map I xi,� Leaend ... . . , • ...e :;Subject Site Zoning Classili atone IN � ;R-1 30.000 Sq Ft Min Lol Sae f 0-2 20,000 Sq Ft Mm L01 Sae 44.1."' 1_ :0-3.5 10.000 Sq Ft Mtn Lot Sae s\ , r._. R1 S 7.500 Sq Fl Mm Lot Sire r �� c-�R-7 5.000 Sq Ft Min Lot Sirs y ii \` O{ [—_,R-12 3.050 Sq Ft Min Let Sae - �iihi a C_�R 25 t.440 Sq Ft Mn lot Sae r-1 R40 40 Units Per Acre ` ‘ 1111‘� � ' _ YUR-1 Mixetl Up Residential t y _MUR-2 Mixed Use RnMenwl 2 t7 _MUR-1 ot. Uw Gnent taus O.s-,. -, : _6C Community COmmercul \� • < • _GG General hood Com D r`'C-N Neighborhood Cgnetrrdsl NI �` .,",,,� H V _C-P Professional Commercial •...,_ _ ' �'U R C'. um MUC Mixed Use Commercial \`� ��iii.1LDRL i Sr MUE1MixedaeeCommercial t Mixed \ 'a:i::•i•:• •ia..... oi♦.?TE C F•E E1N4T E R DR , overlay Zones ?(/Nabnc Oiesbl OYMtaY • \ I-L _ Pen ned Devsbg mant D»dey Map 11.141 2044410 -12 :o •e o7 LIIIII ncAR�0Aps ,r M a e n\ ,- \ ,., ,. . City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/Q1 Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 1,114 • City of Tigard •Request for 500' Property rtY Owner Ma' g Labels TIGARD PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF YOUR REQUEST PHONE:503-718-2438/FAX:503-718-2748 PLEASE INDICATE ALL MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB, Tax Lot 00100) THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PROJECT OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: (If more than one(1)tax lot or if the parcel has no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project.) � I) 79J7ec ) Y ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City,and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness,you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS, PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS. ❑ Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please) with first class letter-rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready NAME OF CONTACT ' ON i.� PHONE: 410,).2z) /q. r G_ NAME OF COMP ly/T7 FAX ( )- - 4 EMAIL: This request can be sent by e-mail,US mail,faxed,or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request,the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will be laced in Will Call" by the company name (or by the contact person's last name if no compan)) at the Planning/Engineering Counter in the Permit Center. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up,as exact cost cannot be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. - EXAMPLE - - COST FOR THIS REQUEST - 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet =$8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 3 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=$ 6 x 5 sets = I 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 J_sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties = sets = to GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL 4W°' I:\CURPL AMasters\500'Property Owner Mailing Labels Requestdoc (Updated:29-Sep-10) notific 41359_8d33673cbfc948afa0df3717ed696bda.pdf http://tiggissvr/arcgisoutput/HiResMaps/notific_41359 8d33673cbfc948afa0df3717ed696bc L' ' i Area Notified (500 Ft)Ingwill HA S I .'..L,j,•/ � \ Ryan S_he„/ � .7, . 4, ,, ,w "7 '555 SW Tech Dente-D' IPA a 01111 Mil creek 11111 ----1 S , Pork i -la lig)_ __ c....I, \ 1pt.111, ... 141111i 1 IIIII ..: 41411 , V• i`. ►....... Mira ..•....•••••••. ••••••. .•.....� �` .��...���� FrpE':'•.'C:�rhe"Ihfr-m irrl, �' r` . \ ��r�r �r7,•..r.�►.: fr-.3 mrn:hs f-cm re da:e Flare en ILA r� i :his map II IS► ig r .sr,a IP! lijk 4M[1. _,,■\ ,_ Mil& , iii! {' , �� a►� �, 111 lit z g d....a,•,...:.;...� Ims x111111 _'.,.. ,`� ` t,GF,,�o, a.,2%/� 1 _ ■III „�..,..•..n = 111 •�•• �� � :x%1111111111 a d �•- •� 1TI N \\ r _ -_G°— �_` i .-`• 111l1T11 _� / ,V11 mill._"litmdlirki, MIR "WI I [I i II N INNS` --- -�0 r. kill _reap S - _ ��♦���♦♦♦S? �� a i r MAP ' s. r�� g -� , n„Aen 1 of Easy Peel'w Labels i Una along "o g = - VE�®5961T1 er b y®Template 5161® aper "'� http://tiggposerRo !action mo•?.ro ker ata&cmd=exp or.ji • . 2S 101bC 06300 2S112BA05900 -2ND VENTL RE LLC GOODHEAD,DAVID D&JAN M BY C DIGMAN&S WILSON 9346 SW PEPPERTREELN "400 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9"224 PORTLAND,OR 9-223 25101DC05900 2S101DC01900 BECKERS,RICHARD T&SHELLY L HERMLANSOX,PATRICIA II 133--SW-4TH AVE -530 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9'223 TIGARD,OR 9-223 2S112BA06400 25101DC04800 BOXITA COURT-36 LLC JOLLY,R.AYNE RAY&JOYCE YVONNE 6-11 SW AMBER LX -410 SW CHERRY DR PORTLAND,OR 9"225 TIGARD,OR 9-223 25112BA06000 25101DC 01300 BOXITA LLC JOLLY,WAYNER OYCEYVONNE 6320 NE HIGHWAY 99 -410 SW Y DR VANCOUVER,WA 95665 - D,OR 9'223 25101DC 03500 25101DC 01-00 BRIXGHURST,LARRY R&SUSAN.31ARI KIRK,iK FAMILY REVOCABLE 13530 SW-5TH PL LIN-ING TRUST TIGARD,OR 9"223 BY wk TAM,&CLAIRE KMRX_AX Tat S -490 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9-223 25101DC 02900 25101DC 01100 CHICK,MAR IBETH A LACHENMEIER LLC 113"3 SW PACIFIC HWY -298 SW TECH CENTER DR PUB*120 TIGARD,OR 9-223 TIGARD,OR 9"223 25101DC 01600 25112AB00400 CONANT,JAMES&ALISSA LANDMARK LANE LLC `310 SW CHERRY DR ATTN GLENN HAYTFR TIGARD,OR 9"223 23643 SW STAFFORD HILLS DR WEST LINX,OR 9"066 25101DC 03000 25101DC 01400 DIMICK,HEATHER M&DAMON R MACKAY,ROBYN L AND BRZ CEE. "345 SW CHERRY DR -430 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9-223 TIGARD,OR 9223 251010001100 2S101DC 03600 FIELDS,FRED W REVOCABLELIVLNG MAGEE,WILLLAM I_AN&SUSAN VERA. 1149 SW DAVE PORT 13492 SW"5TH PL PORTLAND,OR 9-201 TIGARD,OR 9"224 25101DC 05600 2S101DCO2500 GARLAND,CASEY H&GAIL D M AYER,KENNETH D AND 14220 SW 126TH PL LAXICEK TIGARD,OR 9-224 "650 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD,OR 9223 Etiquettes faciles peter • i Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com ,fUstIlisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1_8001 y ,v j � A.c� n� Easy 1'a Labels i uena along' •to , AVERy®5961Tm 1 eI# ( . ®Template5161® F 'a per J http://tiggpbsgiRapSli j&ffaction=mo:.•;-:roker_data&cmd=export. 2510fDC 04602 25101DC 06100 1ICCOR\IACKPROPERTIES LP SHRADER,DAMON R "190 SW SANDBURG ST -4-5 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9-223 TIGARD OR 9-225 25101DC 02400 25101DC 0150D ME IOVIC H,BARBARA I TR STEWART;CAROLEI -630 SW CHERRY DR -450 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR r223 TIGARD,OR 9-223 251010001200 25101DC 02100 METRO Si.t.∎∎ART,IL-1.R TIN D&CARLA E TIGARD,CITY OF -3-D SW CHERRY DR 600 NE GRAND AVE TIGARD,OR 9-223 PORTLAND,OR 9'232 25101CC 00100 251DIDC 04500 11E7R0 SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC ATTN OFFICE OF THE IIETRO ATTORNEY 5550 SW ItACADANI BLVD 571.205 600 NE GRAND AVE PORTL.9.XD,OR 9-201 PORTLAND,OR 9232 15135C BOOBOO 25101DC 02300 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TAKAHAgD,WAYNE H RIGHT OF WAY SECTION SHARON S 355 CAPITOL STREET NE,R)I 420 -610 SW CHERRY ST SALEM,OR 9-301 TIGARD,OR 9-223 25101DC 03302 251D1DC 06500 S: 077'0,WALTER L LORRIEMAY TIGARD,C -435 SR CHERRY DR 13 - HALL TIGARD,OR 9-223 / TIGARD,OR 9`223 25101DC 06000 25112E006100 PACIFIC RIDGE OF LOTS 3-S TIGARD,C , 00000 13 HALL G3RD,OR 9-223 25101DC 02800 25101DC 06400 PAYNE,ICEVIX 3I 77GARD, . F "615 SW CHERRY DR _ lid, 7IGARD,OR 9"223 TIGARD,OR 9-223 251 OIDC 02600 251128&06200 POWELL,JAMES WALTER TRU ST TIGARD,C BY POWELL,JAMES W TR 13 " HALL -660 SW FIR ST // GARD,OR 9"223 TIGARD,OR 9-223 25101DC 03200 25101DC 01600 SHRADER, X R TRUMBULL,DONALD K "4-5 5 HERBY DR TRUMBULL,FRANCES E ARD,OR V223 -4-0 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 0"223 Etiquettes faciles a peler • I Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com 1 iflttilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-ff�- i A•41 DA Easy Peek'Labels • i nen°along• to � >= /I� �� ®5961 TM e11e ry®Template 5161® 'a per h P://ti g�poa�fla�6G actiormo er_ a&cmd=exp ort. 251 010001500 UNIOX PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1-00 FARNHAM ST,10TH FL SOUTH OMAHA,NE 65102 25101 DC 02200 S ANDERBU RG,JOHN SCOTT `590 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR r223 25101DC 04000 WALTON CWOR SOUTHWEST 12 LLC BY CT]ST-WALTON RE TAX 46-8 WORLD PARICWAY C IR 57 LOUIS,MO 63134 2SIOIDC 03101 WLiTHERFORD,BETTY L -495 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD,OR 9'223 251 OIDC 02000 WIDMA ,THOMAS G "550 SW CHERRY DR 77:GARD,OR 9"223 25101DC 05200 WIZLARD,SHAWN P 13469 SW-5TH AVE TIGARD,OR 9'223 2S101DC 03300 WORL I"AA.K,DENNIS&NANCY 13493 SW"'5TH PL TIGARD,OR 9"223 25101DC 04601 WPC TIGARD LLC sir LEIT ER S ST 6TH FL HONOLULU,HI 96813 251 DIDC 04603 WPC TIGAR 30 5ST 6TH FL OLULU,HI 96815 Etiquettes faciles peter • i Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com .ftltilisez le aabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-u P-A A n* Easy Use Averry®T .110 lvadn Feed Pape(X°OP J_j: Persons listed below want to be notified about EAST side development ONLY: DAYLE D.&EVELYN 0.BEACH 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 Jim Long, Chair, CPO 4M 10730 SW 72nd Ave Portland, OR 97223 Utili 4 A � P de chi Affiritgintsetup* AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGAR1) I, Agnes Kowacz, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: a=cs) © NOTICE OF a TYPE II Proposal FOR: SDR2013-00003,Site Development Review for LaCie project, 7555 SW Tech Center Drive,Tigard OR 97223. 0 AMENDED NOTICE- x City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on July 8.2013,and deposited in the United States Mail on July 8.2013 postage prepaid. on that Prepared Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the S`k-rl day of J u� ,2013. I �<, OFFICIAL SEAL �` ) TIMOTHY PATRICK LEHRBACH f () � J NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 0 COMMISSION NO.474153 � / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMBER 13, 1 / �/ 20 6 � �������1� �) N AR f :LIC O •RE ON My Commission Expires: 1213/ 1 6 REVISED DUE TO Notice of a Type II Proposal ERROR IN MAILING COMMENT PERIOD Site Development Review TIGARD Case ID: SDR2013-00003 ENDS 7/22/2013 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Monday,July 08,2013 120 days = Friday,October 18,2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427 agnesk @tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Monday, July 22, 2013 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SDR2013-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Agnes Kowacz. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant, LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building, exterior modifications of man & overhead doors and windows, restriping and additional paving for parking, and a stormwater swale. Applicant: LaCie,LTD Melissa Cahill 22985 NW Evergreen Parkway Hillsboro, OR 97124 Owner 1: Summit Properties Yoshio Kurosaki 5550 SW Macadam,Suite 205 Portland,OR 97239 Proposal Address: 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Tigard,OR 97223 Legal Tax Lot 2S101DC04500 Description: Zoning: I-P: Industrial Park District Approval Criteria: TDC 18.360.050 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 Attachment A I Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice.The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 1 d Site Map ' , erg CC --0 ` '- A I i / i �av mow O��� m �ds p On". s o � � �( 11 , 2r 1114 Elingummimm% 11= m,© n o �� ., as m 01 liM 0 ._ 8 l- emma cWLa © U W LOT �/ O ■�� ■i MEMO BUILDING 49.812±BF i - 1c o • ; m C:i>(o g 0 ice: C� J� O 0 0 N 0 I....1.- �//"„'1_1^ %1+ % ss / i/ TM.OF mu al LJ � ///.�.�:1.. �. . �! Tf7h`lsc It • 0411 ' O ' °� ? 01.;;I: i____.\ \ I 0 I 2.12 Fig_k: 0 0 Pio; 0 p •� O al 11101_111 -' /i 0 __ 41110"11111 tD MA.* A V ew TECH CEilrrBi ON It ”" ,a i CC D ix N / .. ADS/ M , arts AN... __ __ City of Tigard,Community Development Division.13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 • Zoning Map �; VARNS_'' -..--�---� Zoning Map III Pry III NM 1 end ■■•- ®Sublect Site 111111 Zoning C 1 30000 Sa \ I R•1 70.000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae r R-2 20.000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae `4w� R-SS 10.000 Sq Fl Mn Lot Sra \ • , I - A R-45 7.500 Sq Ft Mn Let Sae \ s R-7 5.000 Sq Fl Mn Lot Size \\\� �p t .• j - R-12 7.050 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae i -R-25 1.450 Ft Mn Lot Sae —Y R-40 40 Units Per Acre alt t� t_ MUR-1 Mehl Use Re kleneal 1 A�'..- _MUR-2 Mixed Use Reslenesl 2 \\\ - ..C^C Co Mixed Use Gmrsl Bus Drt �-�, ..C4:-Conmm�Ry Comets cul CG General Commnwl Weil . r-1 6N Neighborhood Camerae \ 4•• „'„ W Professional awl Cortmer e' \ t������, !� �WC Mixed u..Commerce' '44.1.4.10....•.,.... '�lV _MUC-1 Mixed U.COmr»rcell ••...•..•..••.♦ I ' 'MUE Muad UM F-mpobymenl R-25 4444.4i ii••i4i4•�•i _MUE-1 Mi[ee Uw EmpbymeM �••.i i•�4�•i••444.•44�4.4.•i MUE-2 lamed Use Employment 2 . FL Light Industnel •4.4.4.4i:e•••4i•4�4.4ei44 _ :• ••••••••••••4•.••••••••♦ • W nduWel Park •4•4. •11 1. FN Heavy Inc/weed trml 4••.,111.V ..V.1 ME 1Mm41{Ilon County 11.:= Overlay Zones \ ?V Mlabrk Detect Che ey (;i Penned Deveep ant 0,-I-L�j sees wree zs.l+.1a • CCaSrNry OEN1dPeBR 56M IMOIT R-7 � PD . ;c 4wAPrebf�lbee' a� oba7}4 LANDMARK LN �.5� n,�� M 0a' U r n Teen] weee:eerem' City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type II Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 ,, -— . -I 1 f ill 1- -- - 1 1 - 1 - --' 1.--VARNS' ST' Ail boa" ,---1-------L----iivimai ,..., <, -- # .:bur a u, Ns 1 Ems 1 r \. I.! 'I __Z 1 # • / I 1111--1.400 WM °I 1 J III 11111 4111 1 \11,14k,‘ "■, ''s.."\ A — .-1111. 1 i I , If—.. .. ___ :::R j.11:7_ 11 lu -1 I /-i------- I _ \ A,. ...,- I Jail 1:X.1 r 4:11111.411 • 1111' I 111 N\ ..:: -............., . 16 ( ti F IR.-L 0 OR' \)".. .. ,. . • tr,.., . , Ai, .__ ___ . . - ___ . , . ., , r__.____ • ,„.„ ...: , , 7 i.„,,,,,:,..._,•...„, \.A'..\ VIM 0 1 elf4r1 - 1 till 111 41' 1 /...1 . ,41..iii:141Xtal 0., l • v;.„,„. iz Nail 1E2 CV' SAN I 1 DBURG ST •••••.,-,„ _ . . il. 1 \ \•"■.%..4.:1/4 :•••:+:44+:•:•:•:•:4: 11E1 'II i t- ••••••••••••• ,, ....4,.••......40, NA\ •••••4 o••••• •v. •••••4 •• IIII I Oil I••••• • .., ..•••• • • t: - •••••4 ■ 4 04 \ N. ■,*,eves*, , .4 0 P, ,A f IIII r i: r41411b,fir, .N.,,,,„, 0.,+_._....• . ....,1,11,, 1,,,. \ \ tiv Am ireimr 4:,,. A ,•:•:•:•:•:•:*******: i \ \4•••••...............Ato, \ 10111.1111111.1.mid4s1:11YAMIS • • .,.._ ..._ __ , \ . .6- -- - . ..,..._ . _. .,,,.... . • { ,,.. k los _ 1!1 I II .1 I I liP 0 k r°I ir Iligli° LANDMARK LN Feet • - ... A. ... • a n/70 ' ,. N. ,, Nk„, ,... i Il l IIIIIII 2S101'DC04602 25101 DC06100 MCCORMACK PROPERTIES LP SHRADER, DAMON R 7190 SW SANDBURG ST 7475 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2400 2S101DC01500 MEMOVICH, BARBARA J TR STEWART, CAROLE J 7630 SW CHERRY DR 7450 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101CC00100 2S101DCO2100 METRO STEWART, MARTIN D & CARLA E ATTN OFFICE OF THE METRO ATTORNEY 7570 SW CHERRY DR 600 NE GRAND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97232 251010001200 2S101DC04500 METRO SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC TIGARD, CITY OF 5550 SW MACADAM BLVD STE 205 600 NE GRAND AVE PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97232 1S135CB00800 2S101DCO2300 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TAKAHASHI, WAYNE H RIGHT OF WAY SECTION SHARON S 355 CAPITOL STREET NE, RM 420 7610 SW CHERRY ST SALEM OR 97301 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC03302 2S112BA06200 OTTO, WALTER L& LORRIE MAY TIGARD, CITY OF 7435 SW CHERRY DR 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC06000 2S101DC06400 PACIFIC RIDGE OWNERS OF LOTS 3-8 TIGARD, CITY OF 00000 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2800 2S101DC06500 PAYNE, KEVIN M TIGARD, CITY OF 7615 SW CHERRY DR 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2600 2S112BA06100 POWELL, JAMES WALTER TRUST TIGARD, CITY OF BY POWELL, JAMES W TR 13125 SW HALL 7660 SW FIR ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC03200 2S101DC01600 SHRADER, DAMON R TRUMBULL, DONALD K 7475 SW CHERRY DR TRUMBULL, FRANCES E TIGARD OR 97223 7470 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 Attachment 13 2S101DC06300 2S112BA05900 72ND VENTURE LLC GOODHEAD, DAVID D &JAN M BY C DIGMAN & S WILSON 9846 SW PEPPERTREE LN 7400 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S101DC05900 2S101DC01900 BECKERS, RICHARD J & SHELLY L HERMANSON, PATRICIA M 13577 SW 74TH AVE 7530 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BA06400 2S101DC01300 BONITA COURT-36 LLC JOLLY, WAYNE RAY& JOYCE YVONNE 6711 SW AMBER LN 7410 SW CHERRY DR PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BA06000 2S101DC04800 BONITA LLC JOLLY, WAYNE RAY& JOYCE YVONNE 8320 NE HIGHWAY 99 7410 SW CHERRY DR VANCOUVER WA 98665 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC05500 2S101DC01700 BRINGHURST, LARRY R & SUSAN MARI KIRNAK FAMILY REVOCABLE 13530 SW 75TH PL LIVING TRUST TIGARD OR 97223 BY EMMEL&CLAIRE KIRNAK TRS 7490 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2900 2S101DC01100 CHICK, MARIBETH A LACHENMEIER LLC 11575 SW PACIFIC HWY 7298 SW TECH CENTER DR PMB #120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC01800 2S112AB00400 CONANT, JAMES &ALISSA LANDMARK LANE LLC 7510 SW CHERRY DR ATTN GLENN HAYTER TIGARD OR 97223 23643 SW STAFFORD HILLS DR WEST LINN OR 97068 2S101DC03000 2S101DC01400 DIMICK, HEATHER M & DAMON R MACKAY, ROBYN L AND BRUCE E 7545 SW CHERRY DR 7430 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 251010001100 2S101DC05600 FIELDS, FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING MAGEE, WILLIAM IAN & SUSAN VERA 111 SW 5TH AVE#3675 13492 SW 75TH PL PORTLAND OR 97204 TIGARD OR 97224 2S101DC05800 2S101DCO2500 GARLAND, CASEY H & GAIL D MAYER, KENNETH D AND 14220 SW 128TH PL JANICE K TIGARD OR 97224 7650 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223 251010001500 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNHAM ST, 10TH FL SOUTH OMAHA NE 68102 25101 DCO2200 VANDERBURG, JOHN SCOTT 7590 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC04000 WALTON CWOR SOUTHWEST 12 LLC BY CTMT -WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS MO 63134 25101 DC03101 WEATHERFORD, BETTY L 7495 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DCO2000 WIDMAN, THOMAS G 7550 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC05200 WILLARD, SHAWN P 13469 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC05300 WORZNIAK, DENNIS & NANCY 13493 SW 75TH PL TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC04601 WPC TIGARD LLC 307 LEWERS ST 6TH FL HONOLULU HI 96815 2S101DC04603 WPC TIGARD LLC 307 LEWERS ST 6TH FL HONOLULU HI 96815 AV DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested notice 13760 SW 1215T AVENUE re:ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigard. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012. BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR • TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 4B MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND, CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOTE: *Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 1215T AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 • ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING& BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON, SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH Leave on for info for 90 days from 10236 SW STUART COURT 6/24/13.Their mail is being returned. TIGARD OR 97223 f 10,13FT=IsaF140=GPAL74 They haven't provided any new contact info. SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORDINATOR 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OR STATE UNIV EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 15T AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 No persons currently want to be notified about SOUTH or CENTRAL development ONLY: CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 Persons listed below want to be notified about EAST side development ONLY: Jim Long, Chair, CPO 4M 10730 SW 72nd Ave Portland, OR 97223 DAYLE D.& EVELYN O. BEACH 11530 SW 72N°AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 i 1 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -fIGAK1) I, Agnes Kowacz, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: �x G,pp pyre Hogs)Below) © NOTICE OF a TYPE II Decision FOR: SDR2013-00003 (LaCie) NOTICE TO AGENCIES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE— x City of Tigard Development Director El Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on August 12.2013,and deposited in the United States Mail on August 12,2013 postage prepaid. 46-1A - . -s Kowacz STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the \)j j day of ,2013. v#4.•we OFFICIAL SEAL _ CHRISTINE L.WILEY �) ( J NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON { O 1�1® COMMISSION NO.475306 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 03,2017 NOTAR PUBLIC 0 REGON My Commission Expires: Notice of a Type II Decision n Site Development Review TIGARD Case ID: SDR2013-00003 (LaCie) The Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the requested land use action, subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Final Decision and the proposal is described below. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Monday,August 12,2013 120 days = Friday,October 18,2013 Staff Contact: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427 agnesk @tigard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision.Appeal forms are available on the city's website or by person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this land use decision,we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Monday,August 26, 2013. Please include the Case ID Number. SDR2013-00003. Please hand-deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on this form: Agnes Kowacz and note the Case ID Number.VAR2013-00008 This decision is final on Thursday,August 08, 2013, unless an appeal is filed. The decision will go into effect on Tuesday, August 27, 2013, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: LaCie,LTD Owner. Summit Properties Melissa Cahill Yoshio Kurosaki 22985 NW Evergreen Parkway 5550 SW Macadam,Suite 205 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Portland,OR 97239 Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a site development review to modify the existing site to accommodate a new tenant,LaCie. Improvements include: interior remodel of existing building,exterior modifications of doors and windows,restriping and additional paving for parking,and a stormwater swale. Legal WCTM 2S101DC,Tax Lot 04500 Description: Attachment A City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.1 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Report/Notice of Type II Decision Templ_08 28 12 Zoning: I-P: Industrial Park District Appeal Procedure Details The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure)is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1.may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Monday,August 26,2013 Site Map —J Zoning Map te al '111 Leae d ■■d -45 1111:: Subject Site \ 1111 ■ •(r Zoning Classifications R-1 30.000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae I I��T _ T R-2 20.000 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sae R-35 10.000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size R-45 7,500 Sq Ft Mn Lot Sze .S 0 R-7 5.000 St Ft Mn Lot Size OP R-12 3.050 St Ft Mn Lot Sze \� �A�' ~. W R-25 1.480 Sq Ft Mn Lot See R-40 40 UMS Per Acre S,� Pr* K MUR-1 Mixed Use Residential+. ■ MUR-2 Mix d U Residential A IM W MU-CBD Mixed Use Central Bus L'�st ` I7 GC Community Commercial Q GG General Commercial O C-N Neighborhood Comnaresal 11111.C-P Professional Commercial �' _'N e: MUC Mixed Use Common.' '\` e:e::2 •Y $T • _MUC-1 Mixed Um Corrmercul• e.„,,,,,,,,n eeee.e�.�e�.�i�.�. � -NUE Mned Use EmpobYment 11....♦eee.•\\ 0:44:111e�e� NUE-1 Mixed Use Empby,nerR-25 .......e�e�e�.�.�. _MUE-2 Mu.d Use ErtpbYmenl`\ .:eeee:.* _ LL Light Industral se.�.�.e•:e:.:e:e:e FP Industrial Park r.)1��:::� 414 Heavy Industrial \ :i:i.....,�±ii i 2S101DC06300 2S112BA05900 72ND VENTURE LLC GOODHEAD, DAVID D &JAN M BY C DIGMAN & S WILSON 9846 SW PEPPERTREE LN 7400 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S101DC05900 2S101DC01900 BECKERS, RICHARD J & SHELLY L HERMANSON, PATRICIA M 13577 SW 74TH AVE 7530 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BA06400 2S101DC04800 BONITA COURT-36 LLC JOLLY, WAYNE RAY& JOYCE YVONNE 6711 SW AMBER LN 7410 SW CHERRY DR PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97223 2S112BA06000 2S101DC01300 BONITA LLC JOLLY, WAYNE RAY& JOYCE YVONNE 8320 NE HIGHWAY 99 7410 SW CHERRY DR VANCOUVER WA 98665 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC05500 25101 DC01700 BRINGHURST, LARRY R & SUSAN MARI KIRNAK FAMILY REVOCABLE 13530 SW 75TH PL LIVING TRUST TIGARD OR 97223 BY EMMEL & CLAIRE KIRNAK TRS 7490 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2900 25101 DC01100 CHICK, MARIBETH A LACHENMEIER LLC 11575 SW PACIFIC HWY 7298 SW TECH CENTER DR PMB#120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DC01800 2S112AB00400 CONANT, JAMES &ALISSA LANDMARK LANE LLC 7510 SW CHERRY DR ATTN GLENN HAYTER TIGARD OR 97223 23643 SW STAFFORD HILLS DR WEST LINN OR 97068 25101 DC03000 25101 DC01400 DIMICK, HEATHER M & DAMON R MACKAY, ROBYN L AND BRUCE E 7545 SW CHERRY DR 7430 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S1010001100 2S101DC05600 FIELDS, FRED W REVOCABLE LIVING MAGEE, WILLIAM IAN & SUSAN VERA 111 SW 5TH AVE#3675 13492 SW 75TH PL PORTLAND OR 97204 TIGARD OR 97224 2S101DC05800 2S101DCO2500 GARLAND, CASEY H & GAIL D MAYER, KENNETH D AND 14220 SW 128TH PL JANICE K TIGARD OR 97224 7650 SW CHERRY ST TIGARD OR 97223 Attachment B 2S101DC04602 2S101DC03200 MCCORMACK PROPERTIES LP SHRADER, DAMON R 7190 SW SANDBURG ST 7475 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2400 25101 DC01500 MEMOVICH, BARBARA J TR STEWART, CAROLE J 7630 SW CHERRY DR 7450 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101CC00100 2S101DCO2100 METRO STEWART, MARTIN D & CARLA E ATTN OFFICE OF THE METRO ATTORNEY 7570 SW CHERRY DR 600 NE GRAND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97232 251010001200 2S101DC04500 METRO SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC TIGARD, CITY OF 5550 SW MACADAM BLVD STE 205 600 NE GRAND AVE PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97232 1 S135CB00800 2S101DCO2300 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TAKAHASHI, WAYNE H RIGHT OF WAY SECTION SHARON S 355 CAPITOL STREET NE, RM 420 7610 SW CHERRY ST SALEM OR 97301 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC03302 2S101DC06500 OTTO, WALTER L & LORRIE MAY TIGARD, CITY OF 7435 SW CHERRY DR 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC06000 2S101DC06400 PACIFIC RIDGE OWNERS OF LOTS 3-8 TIGARD, CITY OF 00000 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2800 2S112BA06100 PAYNE, KEVIN M TIGARD, CITY OF 7615 SW CHERRY DR 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DCO2600 2S112BA06200 POWELL, JAMES WALTER TRUST TIGARD, CITY OF BY POWELL, JAMES W TR 13125 SW HALL 7660 SW FIR ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC06100 2S101DC01600 SHRADER, DAMON R TRUMBULL, DONALD K 7475 SW CHERRY DR TRUMBULL, FRANCES E TIGARD OR 97223 7470 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 251010001500 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNHAM ST, 10TH FL SOUTH OMAHA NE 68102 2S101DCO2200 VANDERBURG, JOHN SCOTT 7590 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DC04000 WALTON CWOR SOUTHWEST 12 LLC BY CTMT- WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS MO 63134 2S101DC03101 WEATHERFORD, BETTY L 7495 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DCO2000 WIDMAN, THOMAS G 7550 SW CHERRY DR TIGARD OR 97223 2S101DC05200 WILLARD, SHAWN P 13469 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DC05300 WORZNIAK, DENNIS & NANCY 13493 SW 75TH PL TIGARD OR 97223 25101 DC04603 WPC TIGARD LLC 307 LEWERS ST 6TH FL HONOLULU HI 96815 2S101DC04601 WPC TIGARD LLC 307 LEWERS ST 6TH FL HONOLULU HI 96815 DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested notice 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE re:ANY development ANYWHERE in Tigard. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update,August 2012. BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 4B MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY, STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND, CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOT* Don't mail the City of Tigard label 12195 SW 121ST AVE if there is already a label for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GIS labels list. I/CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING & BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH 10236 SW STUART COURT -ave on for info for 90 days from TIGARD OR 97223 /24/13.Their mail is being returned. nn;-r6nwin fln rh, 't provided any new contact info. SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON, CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1sT AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 No persons currently want to be notified about SOUTH VICTOR DEFILIPPIS or CENTRAL development ONLY: 13892 SW BRAYDON CT TIGARD OR 97224 I/CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 Persons listed below want to be notified about EAST side development ONLY: Jim Long, Chair, CPO 4M 10730 SW 72nd Ave Portland, OR 97223 DAYLE D.&EVELYN O. BEACH 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 I/CURPLN/SetUp/Labels/CIT Citywide Last Update:06 24 2013 APPLICANT MATERIALS S PIS-APR RED 8 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISIdC VED LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION APR 2 5 2013 City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 TIGARD Phone: 503.639.4171 1'ax:•503.598.1960 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEEF ING File 1S1)1,2 2i)13-000,0 I Other Case# Date 1112511 3 I By Receipt# Li q 11 2 r J Fee 141?i �.)lP I Date Complete r�©in TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(I or II) ❑Minor Land Partition(H) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ®Site Development Review(H) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSFI)ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address f f available) 7555 SW Tech Center Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. 2S101DC4500 TOTAL SITE SIZE - ZONING CLASSIFICA J1ON 217,960SF/5 Acres IP- Industrial Park Group Mackenzie MAILING ADDRFSS/CITY/S'1'A'IF/LIP — 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland,OR 97214 11 IONE NO. FAX NO _ 503.224.9560 rschera @grpmack.com 503.228.1285 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Ryan Schera ext. 384 1'R,WI-H 1\\\F.R:UI I ■LUI.R;:\n.u'L Ini d mare than our/ Summit Properties Attn:Yoshio Kurosaki MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 5550 SW Macadam, Suite 205 Portland, OR 97239 PI IUNE NO FAX NO. 503.227.5663 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) t - _ _ e_property errant-and-appllcant,_LaCle_ porat ion,IS-proposing tO_make_modifi ations_to-t EXlsting industrial building and site in order to better accommodate their needs for assembly of hard drives. storage of product/material and shipping/receiving operations. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE"BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc • • THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. r �1^t2siv'‘ 51I2f4c ! 3 Owner's Signature Yolk,,c K v►ros o,v4 Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date 4re 2T r3 /i 01 `� Applic /Re resentative's Signature Date ftya� Sc1Atrra , Geotmo Mock eta Applicant/Agent/Repre•entative's Signature Date 11111 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT I i 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 192703 - 08/19/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2013-00003 Inventory Fee-Stand of Trees-1st 100-0000-43116 $181.00 SDR2013-00003 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-each 100-0000-43116 $168.00 adds SDR2013-00003 Inventory Fee-Stand of Trees-each 100-0000-43116 $88.00 add' SDR2013-00003 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-1st 100-0000-43116 $137.00 Total: $574.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 110221 AKOWACZ 08/19/2013 $574.00 Payor: Mackenzie Total Payments: $574.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 TIGARD City of Tigard May 15, 2013 Group Mackenzie Attn: Ryan Schera 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland, OR 97214 RE: Completeness—7555 SW Tech Center Drive Case File No. SDR2013-00003 Dear Mr. Schera: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2013-00003) to modify the existing industrial building, associated landscaping and site improvements to accommodate a new light industrial use, LaCie Corporation. The development site is located at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Property Owner Information. A Special Warranty Deed was submitted showing the property owner as Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation. Summit Properties, Yoshio Kurosaki was listed as the property owner on the application form. Please show the relationship of Summit Properties, Yoshio Kurosaki to Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation as an authorized signer for proposed work to the site. 2. Narrative. Please revise the narrative to address/expand upon the following criteria: • Confirm the number of parking stalls. The narrative states 87 spaces and 85 are shown on the site plan. • 18.360—Site Development Review. Section 18.360.090—Please address the approval criteria. • 18.390—Decision Making Procedure. Section 18.390.040 B2e—Please provide an impact study addressing the impact of the development on public facilities and services. • 18.705—Access, Egress, and Circulation. Section 18.705.030H — Provide the distance between the existing driveways as well as distance from surrounding driveways. • 18.725 —Environmental Performance Standards. Please address this entire section. • 18.745 —Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.745.040A —Street trees are required along SW Tech Center Drive. Section 18.745.050A &B—Buffering (Type E) is required along the north 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov property line according to Table 17.745.1, Buffer Matrix. Section 18.745.040E — Screening: special provisions. Please address 1, 2, and 4. These requirements have changed with the adoption of the urban forestry code revisions. ♦ 18.755 — Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. Please address entire section, specifically 18.755.040 and 050. ♦ 18.765—Off-Street Parking and Loading. Section 18.765.070 — Please address the number of parking spaces required for this project. There are 5 vanpool spaces required. Section 18.765.080—Please address the loading space requirements. ♦ 18.775 — Sensitive Lands. Please identify whether the project is located within any sensitive lands (steep slopes). ♦ 18.790 — Urban Forestry Plan. Please provide an urban forestry plan (33% effective canopy is required for the site). ♦ 18.810—Street& Utility Improvement Standards. Please address the entire section. 3. Site Plan. Please revise site plan to show: ♦ 18.530 — Industrial Zoning Districts. Please show on the site plan how the 15% landscaping requirement is met. ♦ 18.745 —Landscaping and Screening. Show street trees and required buffer areas for landscaping and screening. ♦ 18.765 — Off-Street Parking and Loading. Please show the location of the 2 off- street loading spaces, location of 5 vanpool spaces, and direction of traffic flow within the parking area. ♦ 18.775—Sensitive Lands. Please provide contours showing slope greater than 25%. Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. If re-submitting individual pages/sheets you will need to replace them in the existing packets previously submitted. The updated code, which reflects the changes from the urban forestry code revisions should be online, please contact me if you are unable to find it. Should you have any questions with regard to these items,please contact me at 503-718-2427. Sincerely, Agnes Kowacz Associate Planner cc: SDR2013-00003 Land Use File - RECEIVED GROUP JUN 132013 -_ � MACKENZIE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING June 12,2013 City of Tigard Attention: Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Re: 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Review Response Letter—Case File No. SDR2013-0003 Project Number 2130079.00 N 1A — Dear Ms. Kowacz: N C M In response to your plan review checklist dated May 15,2013,we have addressed the items 0-• Os LL below,with our responses following your comments. O E - 0 g _ 1. Property Owner Information. A Special Warranty Deed was submitted showing the • • q4 property owner as Mt Hood Chemical Corporation. Summit Properties, Yoshio E Kurosaki was listed as the property owner on the application form. Please show the a' a rn relationship of Summit Properties, Yoshio Kurosaki to Mt. Hood Chemical m o ; Corporation as an authorized signer for proposed work to the site. 3 ; — Response:Mt.Hood Chemical Corporation amended its name in 1995 to Summit Properties, to 0 > _ Inc. A copy of the amendment is filed with the Secretary of State as shown in Exhibit A. 0 0 — This comment is met. — a .n 0 4 �._ 2. Narrative.Please revise the narrative to address/expand upon the following criteria: N e N U M _. a • Confirm the number of parking stalls. The narrative states 87 spaces and 85 are shown on the site plan. Response: The correct number of proposed parking stalls is 85. The parking summary on Sheet C2.1 has been revised. (See Exhibit B.) Group • 18.360-Site Development Review. Mackenzie. Section 18.360.090-Please address the approval criteria. incorporated Architecture 18.360.090 Approval Criteria Interiors A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to Structural each of the following criteria when approving, approving with Engineering Civil Engineering conditions, or denying an application: Land Use Planning 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title Transportation including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Planning Response: Chapters 18.360 and 18.810 are addressed below. Landscape Architecture 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: Locations: a. Buildings shall be: Portland,Oregon (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography Seattle,Washington I and natural drainage where possible based upon Vancouver Washington stPn{ existing site conditions; H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc 4 City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 2 Response: No changes to the building location are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; Response: No changes to the building location are proposed with this application. The existing building is not located in an area subject to ground slumping or sliding. This standard does not apply. (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting;and Response: The existing building location consists of significant setbacks from other buildings which provide adequate light, air circulation,and fire-fighting. This standard is met. (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: No changes to the building location are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Response:No existing trees are proposed to be removed with this application.This standard does not apply. c. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard"Significant Habitat Areas Map. "Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Water quality facilities(for infiltration,retention, detention and/or treatment); (2) Pervious pavement; (3) Soil amendment; Response:As shown on Sheet C2.1,a new vegetated water quality swale is proposed along the perimeter of the parking area.The vegetated swale will treat surface stormwater from the parking area.This standard is met. • 18.390-Decision Making Procedure. Section 18.390.040 B2e-Please provide an impact study addressing the impact of the development on public facilities and services. The impact study shall quanta the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways,the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. Response: See discussion below. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc l q City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 3 Transportation According to Figure 5-2 (Roadway Functional Classification) of the City of Tigard TSP (Transportation System Plan),SW Tech Center Drive is classified as a local industrial street. According to Table 18.810.1 (Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics) of the development code, local industrial streets are required to have a right-of-way of 50 feet,a paved width of 36 feet,and 2 travel lanes. Currently, SW Tech Center Drive consists of a 50-foot-wide right-of-way,a pavement width of 36 feet and 2 travel lanes;and thus,meets the code standard for local industrial streets. The existing building is a storage and distribution building with accessory office and 25 parking spaces. Blue Bird Transfer previously operated at the site from 1992 to 2012. It is our understanding that Blue Bird Transfer had a significant volume of trips associated with their distribution operations.According to the ITE Manual,Warehouse Uses(ITE Code 150) generate 3.56 average daily trips per 1,000 SF of building area.Therefore,the previous user generated approximately 181 average daily trips. The applicant will also have a warehouse (storage) and distribution component to their operations; though, on a much smaller scale and in conjunction with new assembly and office space.According to the ITE Manual,Light Industrial Uses(ITE Code 110)generate 6.97 average daily trips per 1,000 SF of building area. Therefore, according to the ITE Manual,approximately 355 average daily trips(or an increase of 174 trips)are proposed. Although the ITE Manual states there will be an increase of 174 average daily vehicle trips, the actual user anticipates a lesser number of average daily vehicle trips based on their operations.LaCie(the applicant)will have two inbound shipments in the weekday mornings to deliver components and materials and one outbound shipment in the weekday evenings to distribute finished/assembled product(6 average daily truck trips). LaCie also anticipates having approximately 100 employees working at the site(200 average daily vehicle trips). Therefore,based on their operations,LaCie anticipates generating 206 average daily trips or an increase of 25 average daily trips over the previous user. Based the standards for local industrial streets and the modest change in trip generation,the existing improvements along SW Tech Center Drive should be able to accommodate the proposed user. Drainage The project site is currently developed as an industrial warehouse and office building,with asphalt paved parking on all sides of the building.The western portion of the site is covered with a gravel outdoor storage yard. The site generally slopes to the south and west, and stormwater runoff from the paved areas is collected in trapped catch basins which lead to a piped stormwater collection system that discharges to the public storm system in SW Tech Center Drive.The public system discharges to a tributary channel of Fanno Creek located at the western end of the street,approximately 100 feet southwest of the site. No existing stormwater treatment facilities are presently on-site, and the runoff currently flows undetained to the public storm system. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc ■ City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 4 The proposed site improvements include an addition of approximately 3,800 SF of new asphalt paving,and redevelopment of approximately 4,280 SF of existing paving.The new asphalt paving will be located along the west side of the parking area, in an area that is currently covered with gravel surfacing. Stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new vegetated swale,which will provide water quality and flow control for the new paved area.The swale overflow will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. Clean Water Services standards require that the site redevelopment include water quality treatment for the redeveloped paving areas,as well as 25%of the total impervious area on site.The proposed redeveloped paving areas are located in the truck loading and handicap parking areas on the south side of the building.Water quality treatment for the re-developed paving areas and for the additional existing pavement requiring treatment will be provided in two storm filter water quality catch basins,which will be installed at the existing catch basin locations on-site.The water quality catch basins will include a single filter cartridge in each structure to meet Clean Water Services' treatment requirements. The proposed LaCie site redevelopment includes adding new paving and redeveloping portions of the existing paved parking lot at the existing industrial development. The proposed stormwater treatment system utilizes a vegetated swale and filter catch basins to provide water quality and flow control for the new and redeveloped paved areas,plus 25%of the remaining impervious surface on-site in accordance with Clean Water Services' standards. No adverse impacts to the storm drainage system are anticipated from this remodel project. Water/Sanitary Sewer As detailed below, a net increase of 6 toilets, 3 urinals and 4 sinks will result with the proposed remodel of the existing building. No new water meters or sewer lines will be required. • Existing to be removed(-):4 toilets, 1 urinal and 4 sinks are proposed to be removed. • Existing to remain: 1 toilet and 2 sinks. • New fixtures(+): 10 toilets,4 urinals and 8 sinks. • Total Fixtures: 11 toilets,4 urinals and 10 sinks • Net Change(Increase): 6 toilets, 3 urinals and 4 sinks. No adverse impacts to the water and/or sanitary sewer systems are anticipated.Any impacts should be mitigated by the required system development charges that will be paid with the building permit associated with this project. Parks The nearest parks are Bonita Park(lt mile)and Fanno Creek Park(2±miles).No adverse impacts to the park system are anticipated from this remodel project. Noise The proposed uses(office,storage and assembly)do not anticipate exceeding the noise limits identified in Section 6.02. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 5 • 18.705-Access,Egress, and Circulation. Section 18.705.030H-Provide the distance between the existing driveways as well as distance from surrounding driveways. Response: Sheet C2.1 has been updated to show the distance between the existing and surrounding driveways. (See Exhibit B.) • 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards. Please address this entire section. 18.725.020 General Provisions A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter,each use,activity or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise,odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining to non point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter. Response:The proposed building and site modifications are in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations.This standard is met. B. Evidence of compliance.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the director may require submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations and receipt of necessary permits; these include Air Contaminant Discharge Permits(ACDP)or Indirect Source Construction Permits (ISCP). Response: No Air Contaminant Discharge Permits(ACDP)or Indirect Source Construction Permits(ISCP)are anticipated with this project.This standard should not apply. C. Continuing obligation. Compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations is the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Response: The owner and operator will continue to comply with state, federal and local environmental regulations.This standard is met. 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 6.02.410 through 6.02.470 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Response: The proposed use(office,storage and assembly)does not anticipate exceeding the noise limits identified in Section 6.02.This standard will be complied with and met. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park(IP)zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point-source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 6 Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions(340-21-015 and 340-28-070)apply. Response:None of the proposed uses or activities will result in stack or other point-source emissions.This standard is met. C. Vibration.No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Response: None of the proposed uses or activities will result in vibrations at the property line. This standard is met. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited.DEQ rules for odors(340-028-090)apply. Response: None of the proposed uses or activities will result in the emission of odorous gases.This standard is met. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted;and Response: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding is proposed.This standard is met. 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source, and Response: No emission or transmission of heat or heated air is proposed to discern at the property line.This standard is met. F. Insects and rodents.All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. (Ord. 12-02§3). Response:All materials including wastes are proposed to be stored and the grounds will be maintained. This standard is met. • 18.745-Landscaping and Screening. Section 18.745.040A -Street trees are required along SW Tech Center Drive. Response:Street trees currently exist along the frontage of SW Tech Center Drive.The trees consist of deciduous(maples)and evergreen(pines)trees and are spaced approximately 40 feet on-center. The existing trees are mature, well established and meet the intent of the standard(See Sheet L2.1 and Exhibit C). • Section 18.745.050 A & B - Buffering (Type E) is required along the north property line according to Table 17.745.1, Buffer Matrix. Section 18.745.050.A Response:The site currently consists of a significant buffer and landscape screening along the north property line. The existing buffer and screening provides similar buffering and screening as required by code. The proposed change in use is anticipated to create a H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 7 reduction in both visual and noise impacts from the previous user. The existing buffer and screening will continue to provide effective privacy and protection for neighbors. This standard is met. Section 18.745.050.B Response:The existing buffer along the north property line varies from 21.56 feet to 41.86 feet in depth. The average setback is 31.71 feet and consists of mature shrubs and approximately four rows of trees that offer a substantially thick screen effectively obscuring any visual of the property and dampening any noises(See Exhibit C).In addition,a retaining wall(varying between 2 feet and 5 feet in height)with a chain link fence atop provides an additional layer of screening.The existing screening described above and shown in Exhibit C meet the intent of the Type E buffering and screening combination called out in Table 18.745.2.This standard is met. Section 18.745.050E-Screening:special provisions.Please address 1,2,and 4. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: Response:The parking area is screened from the street by an elevated/raised berm as well as perimeter and interior landscaping.Each landscape island in the parking area is proposed to be approximately 6 to 9 feet in width and consists of a tree and shrubs.This standard is met. 2. Screening of service facilities. Response: The existing transformer is located on the ground on the south side of the building.The transformer is screened from the parking lot and the street by an existing 5 to 6 foot tall hedge. All other mechanical equipment is located on the roof top and is setback significantly from the roof edge,screening it from the street. This standard is met. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Response: The new tenant is proposing to have a garbage compactor(22 feet long 8 feet wide and 81/2 feet tall)and a cardboard compactor(31 feet long 7 feet wide and 9 feet tall) located at the rear of the building(north side).This area is will be screened from the street by the building. Also, the residential area to the north will be screened from this area by the existing buffer and landscape screening which varies from 21.56 feet to 41.86 feet in depth and averages approximately 31.71 feet. The compactors are fully enclosed and are in accordance with the hauler standards(Pride Disposal).This standard is met. • 18.755 - Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. Please address entire section,specifically 18.755.040 and 050. 18.755.040.F. Franchised hauler review method. Response:Pride Disposal is the franchise collection service for this area.The applicant has been in contact with the Pride Disposal to develop a plan for storage and collection of source-separated recyclable and mixed solid waste expected to be generated from the new building. The new tenant will have a garbage compactor(22 feet long 8 feet wide and 81 feet tall)and a cardboard compactor(31 feet long 7 feet wide and 9 feet tall)located at the rear of the building (north side). Collection will occur once a week. Pride Disposal has reviewed the proposed type/location of containers and has provided a service provider letter (See Exhibit D).This standard is met. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 8 Response: As stated above, the new tenant will have a garbage compactor(22 feet long 8 feet wide and 8 'A feet tall)and a cardboard compactor(31 feet long 7 feet wide and 9 feet tall)located at the rear of the building(north side).This location is sufficiently screened and provides easy access for the hauler. This standard is met. ■ 18.765-Off-Street Parking and Loading. Section 18.765.070-Please address the number of parking spaces required for this project. There are 5 vanpool spaces required. Response:Table 1 below shows the minimum and maximum off-street parking required and proposed for this project.Sheet C2.I has been updated to show 5 vanpool parking spaces as required. Table 1-Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements(18.765.070) Maximum Minimum Maximum Proposed Use Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Zone B Office(11,475 2.7/1,000 4.1/1,000 27 SF) 30 spaces 45 spaces (SECONDARY 27 spaces @ 40 spaces @ 90%per USE) 90%per 18.765.030.D 18.765.030.0 Warehouse 0.5/1000 None 15 spaces (31,040 SF) 15 spaces Light Industrial 1.61/1,000 None 45 spaces (8,855 SF) 14 spaces (PRIMARY USE) Total 56 spaces 136 spaces 85 Section 18.765.080-Please address the loading space requirements. A. Off-street loading spaces. 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Response:The existing building is approximately 48,812 SF.Therefore a minimum of two loading spaces are required. As shown on the revised Sheet C2.1,three loading spaces are proposed along the south side of the building.This standard is met. B. Off-street loading dimensions 2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site. Response:Sufficient area for turning and maneuvering has been provided with the removal of the existing parking lot landscape islands.This standard is met. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 9 • 18.775-Sensitive Lands.Please identify whether the project is located within any sensitive lands(steep slopes). Response: As shown on Sheets C2.1 and C2.2,no development activities are proposed to occur on slopes of 25%or greater,or on unstable ground. The sloped portion of the site is proposed to remain as-is. • 18.790 - Urban Forestry Plan. Please provide an urban forestry plan (33% effective canopy is required for the site). Response:As requested,an Urban Forestry Plan has been prepared for both the site and the parking lot. As shown on Sheet L2.2, the tree canopy for the site area is proposed to be 36.4%.Also,as shown on Sheet L2.3,the tree canopy for the parking lot area is proposed to be 31%. More details and information can be found on the plans.This standard is met. • 18.810 - Street & Utility Improvement Standards. Please address the entire section. 8.810.030 Streets Response: According to Figure 5-2 (Roadway Functional Classification) of the City of Tigard TSP (Transportation System Plan), SW Tech Center Drive is classified as a local street. According to Table 18.810.1 (Minimum Widths for Street Characteristics) of the development code local industrial streets are required to have a right-of-way of 50 feet, a paved width of 36 feet, and 2 travel lanes. Currently, SW Tech Center Drive is already consists of a 50-foot wide right-of-way,a pavement width of 36 feet and 2 travel lanes.The street standards for this classification of roadway are already met. 18.810.040 Blocks Response:No new blocks or right-of-way are proposed with this project.These standards do not apply. 18.810.050 Easements Response: No new easements or utility easements are required with this project. This standard does not apply. 18.810.080 Lots Response:The lot size,width,shapes and orientation is appropriate for the location of the development and for the type of use.The lot already has more than 25 feet of frontage.No through lots or changes to the existing lot dimensions are proposed. These standards are already met or do not apply. 18.810.070 Sidewalks Response:The south side of SW Tech Center Drive consists of an existing sidewalk.Also, an existing sidewalk is not located with 300 feet on the same side of the street. These standards are already met or do not apply. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas Response:No public uses are proposed with this application.This standard does not apply. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers Response:The development is already served by the sanitary sewer system.No changes are proposed with this application. This standard is met. H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\L.TR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 10 18.810.100 Storm Drainage Response: The project site is currently developed as an industrial warehouse and office building,with asphalt paved parking on all sides of the building.The western portion of the site is covered with a gravel outdoor storage yard.The site generally slopes to the south and west,and stormwater runoff from the paved areas is collected in trapped catch basins which lead to a piped stormwater collection system that discharges to the public storm system in SW Tech Center Drive.The public system discharges to a tributary channel of Fanno Creek located at the western end of the street,approximately 100 feet southwest of the site. No existing stormwater treatment facilities are present on-site,and the runoff currently flows un-detained to the public storm system. The proposed site improvements include addition of approximately 3,800 SF of new asphalt paving,and redevelopment of approximately 4,280 SF of existing paving.The new asphalt paving will be located along the west side of the parking area, in an area that is currently covered with gravel surfacing.Stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new vegetated swale,which will provide water quality and flow control for the new paved area.The swale overflow will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. Clean Water Services standards require that the site redevelopment include water quality treatment for the redeveloped paving areas,as well as 25%of the total impervious area on site. The proposed redeveloped paving areas are located in the truck loading and handicap parking areas on the south side of the building.Water quality treatment for the re-developed paving areas and for the additional existing pavement requiring treatment will be provided in two Stormfilter water quality catch basins,which will be installed at the existing catch basin locations on site.The water quality catch basins will include a single filter cartridge in each structure to meet Clean Water Services treatment requirements. The proposed LaCie site redevelopment includes adding new paving and redeveloping portions of the existing paved parking lot at the existing industrial development. The proposed stormwater treatment system utilizes a vegetated swale and filter catch basins to provide water quality and flow control for the new and redeveloped paved areas,plus 25%of the remaining impervious surface on site in accordance with Clean Water Services standards. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways Response:SW Tech Center Drive is classified as a local industrial street and is not planned to provide for a bikeway.This standard is met. 18.810.120 Utilities Response: The site is already served by utility lines for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services.No changes to these facilities are proposed. This standard is met. 3. Site Plan. Please revise site plan to show: • 18.530-Industrial Zoning Districts.Please show on the site plan how the 15% landscaping requirement is met. Response: Sheet L2.1 has been revised to show the area calculated as landscaping. This request has been met. H:\Projects\2I3007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter I30612.doc City of Tigard 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Project Number 2130079.00 June 12,2013 Page 11 • 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening. Show street trees and required buffer areas for landscaping and screening. Response:Street trees currently exist along the frontage of SW Tech Center Drive.The trees consist of deciduous(maples)and evergreen(pines)trees and are spaced approximately 40 feet on-center. The existing trees are mature, well established and meet the intent of the standard(See Sheet L2.1 and Exhibit C). The site currently consists of a significant buffer and landscape screening along the north property line.The existing buffer and screening provides similar buffering and screening as required by code. The proposed change in use is anticipated to create a reduction in both visual and noise impacts from the previous user.The existing buffer along the north property line varies from 21.56 feet to 41.86 feet in depth. The average setback is 31.71 feet and consists of mature shrubs and approximately four rows of trees that offer a substantially thick screen effectively obscuring any visual of the property and dampening any noises (See Exhibit C).In addition,a retaining wall(varying between 2 feet and 5 feet in height)with a chain link fence atop provides an additional layer of screening. The existing screening described above and shown in Exhibit C meet the intent of the Type E buffering and screening combination called out in Table 18.745.2.The existing buffer and screening will continue to provide effective privacy and protection for neighbors. This standard is met. • 18.765 - Off-street Parking and Loading. Please show the location of the 2 off-street loading spaces, location of 5 vanpool spaces, and direction of traffic flow within the parking area. Response:As stated above,Sheet C2.1 has been revised to show the three proposed loading spaces. This request has been met. • 18.775-Sensitive Lands.Please provide contours showing slope greater than 25%. Response: Sheet C2.2 has been revised in order to outline all areas 25%or greater in slope. No work is proposed in this area.This request has been met. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, dAt" era,LEED AP and Use Planner Enclosures:Exhibit A-Amendment filed with the Secretary of State for Mt.Hood Chemical Exhibit B—Revised Plans Exhibit C—Site Photos Exhibit D—Service Provider Letter from Pride Disposal c: Erica Jankowski—Group Mackenzie H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-7555 SW Tech Center-Response Letter 130612.doc a r -( FILED ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO JUN 2 9 1995 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Secretory of State OF MT. HOOD CHEMICAL CORPORATION 1. The name of the corporation is Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation (the "Company"). 2. The text of the amendment is as follows: a. Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 'The name of the Corporation is Summit Properties, Inc., and its duration shall be perpetual." 3. The amendment was adopted on September 27, 1994. 4. The designation, number of outstanding shares and number of votes entitled to vote on this matter, and the number of votes cast for and against the amendment were as follows: Outstanding Number of Votes Votes Cast Designation Shares Votes Cast For Against Attatni Voting Common 677.142 611.428 371.428 0 240 5. The person to contact about this filing is David Copley Forman at (503) 224-3380. MT. HOOD CHEMICAL CORPORATION By: Z Thomas Mulflur, President Pox1-13612.1 52637 0018 21.58• EX SETBACK - _ - - - o M A C •a -- + EX. W �FIETGJI7'VARI y_s*... e ® $ 30 0 �s ao so :ao 0 0. i. 2 «o o s m 0 w O TYP. r • 0 0 ill; �; - I x c w N 1 ) �" (IM DSB'7) 22§ A tI tl .. Inch_90n 0 23.3•* 7 12.5'8' v' I I I it,ssts , ,27 1 11_& to sP 0 9'-90' �` 9 a 9=� I KEYNOTES o`co MOUNTABLE t` O r` III O . 1. REINSTALL MAILBOX ON NEW 4'x4'PT W000 SUPPORT, VERIFY 4'CLEARANCE, MIN. •.6 28' 18. ^1 0D• CURS 17 O 2. PAINTED PARKING STALL STRIPE,4' WHITE o 0 0 _ 7 �,,, 3. 8'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL 8/C9.1 € j 2 ® ..-i ' _ •'.�. ......-._.- __.-._:. 4. ADA ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP,SEE DETAIL 11/C8.1 .2:1 c a o 27 _4 I - - 5. ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALL INSTALL VAN-ACCESSIBLE -Ti c MOUNTABLE/ - N SIGNING WHERE NOTED BY'VAN'ON PLAN,SEE DETAIL 8/C8.1 m au 3 a ¢C CURB • 7 O 6. INSTALL PRECAST CURB STOP 3'FROM FACE OF CURB WALL. TYP.SEE DETAIL 3/C8.1 O q«• a 4 W 1 a 0 C a II■ v 15' I ��C ® I 7. FACE OF NEW ENT 1 WMIN. FROM IS EDGE GREATER.PA SEE DETAIL 5/C8.1 3/MIN.FROM C°c 1-68 ® q ® - m I l9 I-_i to © x 8. 2'CURB BREAK WITH 3'x1•CONCRETE SPLASH PAD,SEE DETAIL 3/C&i 1 P 9. INSTALL(2 BOLLARDS BEHIND NEW CURB TO PROTE T plant EXISTING GRAVEL A F EXISTING RE HYDRANT TO REMAIN.SEE DETAIL 15 1 LOT I © _ 9' 10. INSTALL WATER QUALITY CATCH BASIN AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN II �I 'L b. LOCATION F. EXISTING BUILDING 11. PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. Lil tai'," EXh71■�.7 N 12. TRUCK DOCK RETAINING WALL, SEE ARCH PLANS l _ 48,812±SF M 9.94' 13.PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK STRIPING, PAINTED 1'WHITE, EX. SETBACK MIN. SPACING 6 FT. a 25 0 TYP, 1 14.S CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL 8/C8.1 t 15. 1,108 SF VEGETATED WATER QUALITY SCALE Yer 0 zai ® 16.PROTECT EXISTING IXTRUDED CURB TO REMAIN N ® - O 17.CONCRETE STAIRS WITH HANDRAIL SEE DETAIL 14/C8.1 16.5' fi CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVING, REMOVE CURB AND LANDSCAPING AS NEEDED � 19.PROTECT EXISTING WALL 10 REMAIN t 18 � I ® O 20.INSTALL NEW TERMINAL FENCE POST AT END OF NEW CURB,MATCH EX.FENCE. t I • 0 REMOVE EXISTING FENCE NORTH OF POST,INCLUDING GATE.•ii! _ 0 I 11 21.4'CONCRETE SIDEWALK LANDING AT EXIT DOOR. ' ..i��'' 33,e' >K B,1 6.5' µ• 22.PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAIN Pro Met \\I 0 10 1, Pj4 I'f "7F° 4 23.SIDEWALK RAMP IN PARKING ISLAND,SEE DETAIL 13/C6.1 Leas TENANT IMPROVEMENT 7.9' _--^� _ 24.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN g •O o_ \ 0 s I It?!9Syt,� I� 25.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL SURFACING. THEN EXCAVATE AND BACKFiLL y1 -- � F WITH TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE ISLAND AREA SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR j� 'IIR*!Cf ° �q�� ! PLANTING DETAILS AND TOPSOIL DEPTH REQUIREMENTS. MSS 6W TECH CB1T DR 0 Ill•WIr��n r x� �� I 6.:KE RA•S • T • • C'E P .. R •S PR•VI'NG 10 '�'A!3 �x D T 9 8.1 ���'� 0 �� -_ _ __. ms /r L e, 27.CARPOOL PARKING DESIGNATION, 12'HK,II . INS PANTED LETTERING O READ'CARPOOL` _ - • / 28.TRASH AND RECYCLING COMPACTORS(OFCI). INSTALL BOLLARDS 12'FROM COMPACTOR PER ® ENLARGED ENCY PLAN s_✓`` _ _- +'� DETAIL 15/C&l. \ , TYP. of 5 LEGEND •'��M° n 0 23.4• R=10' O R=1D' 1 CONCRETE CURB PER 1/C8.1 - __ - f'T mom ' \\�i I 10 dd d d d e, ® MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB PER 2/Gil �y�' 7 1 • O .. -_ _ a `.. FENCE -a c IM RE& 12/31/131 0 EDGE DF GRAVEL ' ■ 16 O .J 0 _ . All BEES R DJ . THESE DRAMATICS ARE THE PROPERTY OF .- LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING OIOUP WAOm1z¢AND ARE NOT TO BE . - _- 2421 t SEE DETAIL 7/CB.1 �...�.�. USED OR RPRI WRIT N ANY ISSDI. J WI7RgiT PRIOR M1ITTEN PTRYISSIpI ��/ 32.6't 51.1't 31.4'3 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 17j//.//� 37.3'( S T�CENTER DR p MATCH EX. EX.D/W �/II EX. D/W * CURB �,* / EX. D/W SEE DETAIL 7/C8.1 _____..._ REVISIONS EX.PAVING CONCRETE PAVING OR SIDEWALK Ot6 CLOSING DATE ! - _-___.- _ -..__ _ _-._ --___ _-_ ___ 1 _.--_ ._.__ ® 1 X IN PROGRESS j - . / CATCH BASIN SITE PLAN F -i, LUMINAIRE 'I -z Ilr " {' SCALE: 1' = 30• LOADING DOORS(DOCK AND DRIVE-UP) A A it .. ----•1- �_�_._�:;-�_ SfTE COVERAGE DATA I� N 54.29 ���5 Q FI,998 C(1.58 AC 71.103 (1.63oN GENERAL NOTES PAVED AREA 87,998 SF (1.58 AC) 71,103 sF (1.83 AC) SHEET TITLE ji `� _ SIDEWALK AREA: 832 SF (0.02 AC) 2,054 SF (0.05 AC) �E PLAN I• 16• 0 �7`rw 1. AU.WORK SHALL CONFORM TQ THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 48.812 SF (1.12 AC) 48.812 SF (1.12 AC) ���� CLEAN WATER SERVICES(CWS). AND THE OJRRENT AMERICAN PUBUC WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC 1p aaaa. WORKS CONSTRUCTION. r 0 _ `4� IMPERVIOUS AREA: 117,640 SF (2.70 AC) 121,969 SF (2,80 AC) (58.07) 5 RISERS 2. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET,BEND OR ELBOW GRAVEL AREA: 38.517 SF (0.88 AC) 32,806 SF(0.75 AC.) (15.0%) o- Z` ��*&*4 kFLUSH WITH AC REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY DIMENSION,COMPONENT PIECE. SECTION JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS FOR WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AREA: 61,803 SF (1.40 AC) 63.185 SF (1.45 AC) (290%) MINI� ® AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING LANDSCAPE UNDERCRQUND UTILITIES LAYING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS TO CONDITION• � SIZE AND LOCATION BY UNCOVERING,PROVIDING SUCH IS PERMITTED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES W1TH JURISDICTION, TOTAL SITE AREA: 217.980 SF (5.00 AC) 217.960 SF (5.00 AC) .r - BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES. r- - 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS REQUIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE DRAWN BY:IAN r-�. ------ -� INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO MEET CITY OF TIGARD AND CWS REQUIREMENTS. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, JL pE/�y� ����p�� .sue �- © AT ANY TIME,ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL PARKING SUMMARY CHECKED BY: MWB CI f © 5. VAN O 4' , EFFECTIVE OUTER S CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE$WALL U CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHEET:pi 0 ¢'O.C. •0:45' SHALL BE ROUTED SO THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY,PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING SYSTEM ARE Q FXISTIJ(D ffiPS= I' '. OF 3 NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TIME,ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND 110 OT STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. STANDARD PARKING STALLS 24 73 C2.1 5 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 1 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS TO NEW FINISH GRADES. 6, ON WI �'� j - © _ 8• CARPOOL STALLS(CONVERT EX. PARKING): 5 id _ EXCAVATION: EXCAVATE FOR SLABS PAVNG ANp OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. 4_ _y__ - COMP Y WIITH O.IR. 57.5 11 THROUGH 57.571 NCO CAVATOR(ST)SNALLINO IFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FORTLLINE MUST EXISTING PARKING STALLS TO REMAIN: 3 ~ -¢_ r--0� - _V--I- _ '-r'- - --T-3 O- -��---r LOCATE JS S TWO(72)EH ONE pWE,NIWO)LOCATE TOY TART OF OWN WORK. DAMAGE TO UTI I METRO ESH LA 6CORR4C� TOTAL 25 85 ®ENLARGED PLAN - FRONT ENTRY 7 OF THEQUEXISTING PIPE VERIFY THE LOCATION SIZE MID TO ORDERING ELEVATION. NOTIFY MATERIALS, THE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.XOSE THE END BIKE PARKING: 0 10 JOB NO. 21300T9.00 ' SCALE: 1' = 10' 8 REQUEST BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. MAJOR ATw'SUBMITTAL-6`/M/� NNW W • VAN4. fir v • AC `ATCH E7V AC EX. EXISTING GRAVEL LO itiE 7 a WRigl iILTFI.I AC AC Lid I MATCH EX. AC MATCH EX. AC EX TC AC EX. EXISTING BUILDING FF-171.99 SEE DETAIL 2/C2.2 FOR- ENLARGED GRADING PLAN BOTTOM WALL TOP WALL EX. PAVEMENT 8'OVERFLOW RISER RIM ELEV.•169.25 8" STORM LATERAL, CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"STUB IE-165.0± (VERIFY) MATCH F>(. fI:F74F7 AC MATCH EX__ !Id R11,apW-�. ;r.1�.a EX AC as AC Awl REMOVE EX.TiTEEE CATCH BASIN. INSTALLNEW FILTER CB2 SEE DETAIL _ -163.1±rF-...� CONNECT T 'A d MA LEGEND REMOVE EX:STEEL CATCH.B INSTALL NEW FILTER C81 - SEE DETAIL I/C82..._.- --_--_ RIM-181.3± - -iE-0Ul ]S8. (VERIFY) CONNECT TO-EX PIPE----- d(105DF) PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN. BOLLARDS BEHIND CURB„- GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' 30 0 15 30 60 MATCH EX. t 1I i 589 OSUC'Yi , MATCH LX. SW TECH CENTER DRIVE 120 CONCRETE CURB MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB FENCE EDGE OF GRAVEL LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CATCH BASIN LUMINAIRE >25%SLOPE AREA FXISTTND PROPOSFQ r J :111LL11L.L.L.L.L A (IN FEET I 1 inch = 30 ft S-, -__.._,_ • 1 �I1 MATCH EDT. AC -''ADING NOTES D 1 JI? ARE(NOT OTHERWI INDICATED,tOFINISH ( gDESMARE TO BBE THE SAME EAS ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, CURBS, OR THE OBVIOUS GRADE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURE. GRADE TO UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE GRADES ARE GIVEN. ROUND OFF SURFACES, AVOID ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVELS. ROUGH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLABS, WALKS, AND THEIR BASE COURSES. GRADE FOR PAVED DRIVES AND PAVED PARKING AREAS AS INDICATED AND SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND PROVIDE FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE AS SHOWN, ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SURFACING MATERIALF1NISH �g�Q _ AT COMPLETION OF JOB AND AFTER BACKFILLING BY OTHER CRAFTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED,REFILL AND COMPACT AREAS WHICH HAVE SETTLED OR ERODED TO BRING TO FINAL GRADES.GRADING TSLllANCES: ROUGH GRADE AT PAVED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS: ±0.1 FT. FINISH GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL SURFACING: ±0.03 FT. 2 &3,igit.TANtQUIRED EXCAVATE ALLOW FOR FORM NCLEARANCE AND FOR IMPROVEMENTS PROPER COMPACTION OF REOUIRED BACKFILLING MATERIAL XCAVATOR(S)MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; EXCAVATORS)SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTIUTY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS 72 HOURS MINIMUM)PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO UTIUTIES S ALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS REQUIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING THE CITY OF TIGARD AND CWS REQUIREMENTS. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBUC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPUSH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. 5. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND USED FOR LANDSCAPING. 6. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASED ON A SURVEY BY NORTHWEST SURVEYING INC., AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH HIS OWN RESOURCES PRIOR TO START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE GRADES AT ENTRANCE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. 2%MAXIMUM SLOPE AT ALL ADA-COMPLIANT PARKING SPACES AND LOADING ZONES. 9. 5%MAX SLOPE(EXCLUDING RAMPS)AT PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PUBLIC R.O.W. AND BUILDING ENTRANCES. 10.WHERE SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3:1,CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUTE MATTING. SLOPE SHALL BE PREPARED TO ENSURE COMPLETE AND DIRECT CONTACT OF MATTING WITH SOIL FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, CLEAN WATER SERVICES, AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. REQUIRES A PUBUC WORKS PERMIT. 2. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET,BEND OR ELBOW REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY DIMENSION, COMPONENT PIECE. SECTION. JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS FOR WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES LAYING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS TO CONDITION SIZE AND LOCATION BY UNCOVERING.PROVIDING SUCH IS PERMITTED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION, BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES. 3. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN THE CURRENT UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CHAPTER 7, SECTIONS 707 AND 719, AND CHAPTER 11,SECTION 1101.12. NOTE NOT ALL REQUIRED CLEANOUTS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL STORM PIPING IS SIZED FOR A MANNING'S'N'VALUE - 0.013. ALL STORM PIPING IS DESIGNED USING CONCENTRIC PIPE TO PIPE AND WYE FITTINGS,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING AND TO 5'OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. 6. ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS TO BE 6" AT 2.0%MIN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITIES BY POTHOLING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 8. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY NORTHWEST SURVEYING, INC., DATED 2/12/2013. 9. EXISTING ON-SITE UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PREPARED BY VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENGA AND ASSOCIATES,DATED 4/27/1982. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 10. SEE BUILDING PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR PIPING WITHIN THE BUILDING AND UP TO 5'OUTSIDE THE BUILDING, INCLUDING ANY FOUNDATION DRAINAGE PIPING. 11. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FT OF COVER OVER ALL WATER LINE. MATCH DOOR NDING 5 E0. RISER AC LANDING 11.1.11.!1 IEDFWAI MATCH j169 40 X. 2 GRADING ENLARGEMENT - ENTRY SIDEWALK SCALE 1'- 10' MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 O 1L 0 0n co C G 00 EL in Client Project Lade TENANT IMPROVEMENT 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR TIGARD.OR ry 'EW W. [EXPIRES 12/31/131 ® GROUP MACKENZI:2013 AL.RIGHTS RESERVED THESE OIUeNGS ARE T1[PROPERTY OF p10J'MAGKENZIE NO ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED M ANY MANNER, MTHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION REVISIONS: s,1 REVISION OC_TA CLOSING DATE IN PROGRESS SHEET TITLE: iADNO AND URRY PLAN DRAWN BY:MH CHECKED BY:MWB SHEET: C2.2 JOB NO. 2130079.00 _ o 03 I A 1-RADIUS B•NOTED ON PLANS e <o •' ' - ='U-11=11 •A N • o. 3 K• nC • PAVING SECTION oea ym� w a SAW CUT EXISTING A.C. 5 m n• .-II• /////i 61RUIAIN PAVING AS SHOWN ON PLANS. o °o `m ali v - NEW PAVING EXISTING AC TO REMAIN o o D m N E m c ` 1 • � 3000 r EXISTING ROCK BASE t c J 1 v ;0.!...11.1.7.. PSI S 1A DAYS. a SACK L MIX. SLUMP: 1 1/2 TO 3' 1' SS PLANS 1' AIL. AND SUBGRADE-DO NOT ►� TAPER CURB CONCRETE CURB /�I y '—"C DISTURB SLOPE PER a m ;II ?.:41.1.1t/..1 ROCK BASE COURSE �� Y ROCKBASE • .� �� •v—L I _.GRADING PLAN ;N rs 1 1 i 11, SEE PAVING SECTION Y'� 1 °•�a o�D o�p MOT -�E 2}4•LEVEL 2 WMAC(1 LIFT) `o co III I-III 'I—I - PROPOSED �Do`D Do�p' - -I -L -.Y? JI._ ROCK K 0'CRUSHED °wm CAST IN PLACE _ _ I �( o CONCRETE CURB I 9' \PAVING SECTION,SEE PLAN Cro°op°op°op°.I I�I I MATCH EXISTING AC THICKNESS 11=1f=11 11=11 11 11-1f MAX EASE COMPACT 7 TO 95%OF a m L SUBGRADE M,°,Jpo0�o0� I-II _ - MAX. DENSITY(Ots57) pc g ,d OR NEW SECTION C THICKNESS IS m m ..°pop°oq°,I I GREATER) SUBGRADE m m 2 > -� -11 LIGHT DUTY AC PAVEMENT a c a Z mW=a KE°o e CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB ®CONCRETE CURB BREAK ®SAWCUT DETAIL ,, SLOPE PER N.T.S. �; N.T.S. . N.T.S. GRADING PLAN p1 a'•a m 6' 10' Y 4'LEVEL 2 WMAC(2 LIFTS) W o e 9m a s AC PAVING PLANS AND ION .�U �� • , - .I„ .� FINISH �• M- - '•, (COMPACT TO %OF MAX. DENSITY(01557) W V W f a.o ija ��` S!i CROSS SLOPE IL=11'-If=11:-If-11°II-11 SUBGRADE ■ .r-�.:_�.:!v,. �� •\ B TOPED FDfE EACH SIDE Client l 7-17 1.- - - - II-I�s_-,:_;�;�--s_;:_=._;�ss_;�: I cl HEAVY DUTY AC PAVEMENT -.. °-�-,,/, 18' WHEEL BLOCKS. _ I 1` iii L`'i x--111- 1141,--1` `I 1 I M N SEE DETAIL 1, '-1 I I.-� 1=I I I -1 I I I I�`�I. BASE SECTION ASPHALT \�/•� - •• COMPACT SUBORADE AND ACREGATE I 4'CONCRETE 3,000 PSI(Nie)SKO W PER PLANS AND ■ TO 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY ((AAXX)� T 5'-Or //CC NUL_ t OTECH REBAR,18•LONG .. (r�) EIPANSIp1 JONIS�AT520'-0'0/C OR N� •CONCRETE TO HAVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI IN 28 DAYS,2 TO 4'SLUMP. (2)PER WHEEL BLOCK. 7?• 'O 2. DEPTH AS SHIM ON PLANS •CONTROL JOINTS AT 2'-0'0/C AND EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20'-D'0/C AGGREGATE '-0 Yer N.T.S.MOUNTABLE CURB AND CUTTER PRECAST CURB STOP ; CONCRETE SIDEWALK ®AC PAVEMENT SECTIONS N.T.S. 3/B D. 3/fr---„, ADA STATE REQUIREMMENT 1y�0 GALV. SEE DETAIL 11 C8.1 TOP OF CURB TO ` POSTS/RAIL MATCH BACK OF 093'ALUMINUM PLATE BLUE BAIX(ROIA•i PLAT -\,/ R-lO�j• I _ SIDEWALK ELEVATION PROVIDE AIM Ik I ILA NO DER. _.,., •T ` ..+, SCORING PER AMONDA BAKED ENAMEL(OR-20-68) ,,,,,,, f r i�i�i'�i�i��•/���� � N"°° '^ _ i I_t_ II12.�� CR_���1�` /sEE DETAIL 6 C8.1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN pt7-89) ( VAN I . PROVIDE TACTILE (MERE CAUID OUT 011 PLANS) ACCESS�.E J �' i1/. TAPERED CURB WARNING PER A.D.A. 1/4' SEE DETAIL 12/C8.1 �� CONCRETE TO BE 7555 8W TECH CENT DR .- CONCRETE FOOTING L� • (/�) FLUSH WITH AC � �,� inl �(/^�\)°I O^V(/A�`) ADA COMPLIANT ! ...:;.:=2- GALVAN®STEEkl POST I b =LVOOY\V PAVEMENT ,;%`' .}AT•2 IO OC TYP. , w U SYMBOL SEE "� . (/n�) • DETAIL 10/CB.1 36•TYP. FINISH GRADES n •NOMINAL V ,v /'� ,.. DIMENSIONS 1' Amp A A n ell NUMBER OF POSTS DIAMOND PATTERN WARNING SURFACE / NorES +ml AS SHOWN ON PLANS ' MOUNTING `+ u u CO _ _ • �- 1.ALL ADA COMPLIANT STRIPING AND CONCRETE _ .i' SIGNAGE TO COMPLY WITH ADA AND FOOTING o=_\'•' i" i ROIL DIAMOND PATTERN WARNING SURFACE ON THE ENTIRE CURB RAMP INCLUDING CURRENT JURISDICTIONS y a�YO11 y lock �•#��E�E��� 2, RAMP THROAT, LANDING,AND WINGS. PATTERNED SURFACING TO BE INTEGRAL COLORED REQUIREMENTS. •/At .„ b CONCRETE.DARK GRAY TO CONTRAST WITH STANDARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK. - - y�, COMPLIANT SIGN TO BE MOUNTED b 16' 2.DIAMOND RAMP TEXTURING IS TO BE DONE WITH AN EXPANDED METAL GRATE '-PAINT STRIPE _ CENTERED IN DISABLED SPACES. 'MIRES: 12/31/13 1 • PLACED AND REMOVED FROM WET CONCRETE TO LEAVE A DIAMOND PATTERN AS g•(T`KPICAL) � 5�PLANS r 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LATEST • DERO BIKE RACK MODEL HEAVY DUTY HOOP RACK OR APPROVED EQUAL SHOWN. THE LONG AXIS OF THE DIAMOND PATTERN SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR ADA REQUIREMENTS AHD REVISE iU'DIA. POWDERCOAT BLACK FINISH. IN-GROUND MOUNT OPTION.WWW.DERO.COM TO THE CURB. GROOVES SHALL BE)b'DEEP ANO)(•WIDE. ANY COMPONENT TO CONFORM ■ MIN. TO CURRENT STANDARD. © I 2Elt e ADA COMPLIANT VAN PARKING SIGN BIKE RACK PLAN/ELEVATION Q ADA COMPLIANT WARNING SURFACE ®ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALL T' t«a=X x110:0 • N.T.S. �; N.T.S. ®N.T.S. USED DJ REPRODUCED N ANY WANNER, • •; N.T.S. WITHOUT PRIOR MITTEN PERMISSION 6' T. , REVISIONS: 1 o¢ < RAM ON rA • �{ CLARK DATE 1 IN PROGRESS •T of E 3'WIDE PAINT CONCRETE PAVING STRIPE TYPICAL 4•CONCRETE LANDING 1Y TREADS,SEE RAN ' , - . < 1 1/B'TOOLED RADIUS >7I� EDGES 1/2'R S F 10' ANTI SKID NOSING 1 x eyz t' -m•-i y NOTES: `r �� ��• 1.SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR I .. *-40,' SHEET TITLE: e ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SYMBOL M t� .� LOCATION of EXPANSION 1 1/4'PIPE RAIL ~ :!�4 �•��•`���• JOINTS. �T��r 0 N.T.S. 6'STANDARD STEEL PIPE 2.NO SHINERS ON TOOLED I• CONTROL JOINT©./ NOSE BARS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED AGGREGATE PER SIDEWALK DETAIL JOINTS. Al �\ FILL W/CONCRETE ROUND 8/C61 �'! � ► �� TOP TO SHED WATER e PROVIDE TACTILE WARNING PER A.D.A. ROUND TOP OF FOOTING TO ♦; N.T.S canAa-4101, SEE DETAIL 10/C8.1 61 SHED WATER ° • I TOOL RECESSED SEALANT l = TOOLED CONCAVE SEALANT TIGHT TO s� Z I INSTALL EXPANSION CONCRETE SLAB OR PAVING BACKER ROD.•• : �., JOINT AT FACE OF ,' SECTION SEE PLAN DRAWN BY:NH ■ • J������ 40-4. � 'I BOTTOM RISER .§ I ROUNDED POLYMER BACKER ROO •�•�����������������•��i , ������������ • ♦ WITH NO BOND TO SEALANT. CHECKED BY: MWB ♦ 1 ������������•i ?4. �I! SHEET: ♦ ♦ ?OH. ♦ r �" 11 - 1.1 1'-O'DIAMETER CONCRETE ' •••VV. �',.. ��•� .',N" { FOOTING 3/8'PRE-MOLDED JOINT FILLER m�i__• �-�•♦ 5 B •CONCRETE WALK i1 vl-. 1. INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20' \�.♦ N. R AD`J4N o; 6 1'-0' 2:0..1.4.4,44101....„46:11.41..4...6;:c INTERVAL OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN. lV_ I •T"` ,- CURB F COMPACTED FILL 0 �"'�• SIDEWALK DETAIL , 2. NSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS TO•ell 6'TO 0'ORB 8/C&1 �� `�W PENETRATIONS FROM CONCRETE PAVING. N.T.S.ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMP CONCRETE STAIR e 6'T.S.PIPE BOLLARD .a ®EXPANSION JOINT sa_ Joe No. 2130079w MAJOR MODIRCATION SUBMITTAL — 6/11/13 o co C GENERAL NOTES e Q w 2 )STORMrLLRR D CONRCH SEAWATER 90WTION9 PORTWNC,OR DOD)`S40- C C 3 . �ABOROUGM.ME(077) 410 OPENING 907 AG7G:ELMIDGE,MD(A60 7463310. O• O OUTLET STUD •p a i Y ISEE NOTES 4451 I EERMAN[N'FOOL .+ 2)FlTD610 BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND 94fCILIWNG. m «A J !I1VATION 3)9Tm STRUCTURE TO OE MANUFACTURED or 0r.N NCH SRS PLATE. O m a0 �!O G' 1 ...- 41'TO/WE'TO/WELTER REQUIRES 2.3 MET OF DROP 11tom MA TO OUTLET. INLET SHOULD NOT EC LOWS R,AN OUTLET.INLET DP m O N og _ OVERLAP ATTUGIOUEJ ANG OUTUEf PIPING TO 0[SPCCYIm DY dGReR AID FRONDED DY CONTRACTOR = O C 3)COS,EOUIPRD W M 4 INCH(APPRONMAtQ HONG 37UDS POR INLET(m APPUCAOLC AD OUTLET PIPING.STANOAAI 01111Er All U 0 C 1 •µ• STUB b O INCHES IN DIAMETER.MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB g 15 INCHES IN CIAM[•OL CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING WEIR WALL �. , - A • _ .1 vARIIS ,�� CAN p<AMOE USING FIDIOIL COUPLING BY CONTRACTORC =W • •• 2'-3 5/0'MAX. 2 3 5Ttl' G)FOR M-20 LOAD RATING.CONCRETE COLLAR O REQUIRED.Cr ONCP_.E COLLAR wan OUANTPV 2. RE Q R DE PROVIDED OY CONTRACTOR () NPORLING lSAR9 TO <O - _ 7)ALL SORMPILRR3 REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE.CE.R$19L TO OPERATION AND MANTENANC[GUIDELINES P R MORE CO _� •�"� INFORMATION. O• LLk 0 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN I IF A i`1 .... 4• 0 • STORMFILTER DATA o°g o SCUM fv.r-r1[ A. _\ �.. _ : ~(�T; OU'IET SUB STRUCTURE ID j{�` (� C C N (SEE NOTES 44 5) WATER QUALM FLOW RATE(a,) 0. � QQ3 O_m O el I .... INLET ET SUUE I C (.scE NORM 44 5) .. PEA.PLOW RATE Dc l oh) O. 4 �S 1 O C C t • . . RETURN MOD OP PEAR FlOR(N5) 25-`R 25-YR 5,C U 14 :i R. . --. :• 2,� ln PR[ CARTRIDGE now RAT[115 OR 7.5 woe 'rj 1 • O C 2 Q p ZI .. _..••.,:-~ .1 �2'O I/2'-- PROM UNGERDRAN MEDIA T'T[(CSF.MUTE.BG) CSF 431* ►. .m G °.1? 1 OUTSIDE i21M WATCH 32 C.G. KONG BAR: PIPE DATA: ,.E. - W•j•.G U INLTSTUD IS/2 NOR G 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTIONVIEW B IN',ETsrls x1X.wr niA niA v v° _N (OPTIONAL) O OUTLET STUD 1X%.10( ]S3.010•)T60.0(6'J NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO C - LSE[NOTES 4{5) CONHGIRATION CONNECTIONST�PIPE ED 5 W I-J a b OUTLET OVRLT EX CATCH BASINS 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-PLAN VIEW O INLET �INLLT Client SLOPED LID I J NO 4Y0 LIFTING EYE Or 4i (1Yr 50JD INO IM ET GTU-• OPENING n�::S COVEN VDR _s=SW MI NOTE55PEOAL REQUIREMENTS: L 2 11r [i _. 1 INLT GRATE ACCESS COVER W I-I' OUTLEF BNB \. CONCAVE Cd1AR %A\; PERMANENT (SEE.NOR 6) 3 U. POOH.PINAiiON _'♦` .` _ VW NO 1115 403) 141 I T. .• i I I I I I I I I h r..o.❖.•.I .'y O /--.` FT.i.....• r IUT�JII(LnIIIILTFIIII n•• a .• STORNI%TEA I I'I II I •����������14. ° • 1�2'. CARTRIDGE(T YE) CARrwDGe T '6' LIIJLI V♦�42.4�∎••••∎ •' SUPPORT . i I I I I I I I I I .___•____•_ .: r-4. • owe RM llHfl:I1:l " iiii• I(SEE NOR 2 ••••♦4.w UNEDRAN 9 u!■s!c •�!c � MAtlrpD _ .4 N510e-- 3/4. SDe� 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW OC 4 •ate '_ •• 4'4 3.4' OUTSIDE 2 • 214'• R4'.• ----- - , 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN•SECTION VIEW A R!T°R.A a WwNx R, R!Dlm NMawT REID[R�E IgD[R2! >m.../e. Tr[ltOeMM .AAWLL>pr Project (31 O s.ITAT As.>01041n. 4'a'�' !c-�Plr.r. cons!! us.r m+rw.sua.laA arum RM �}.rArN.-A,. .l�im, Lacie TENANT 'rosin.11u 4ves,e!! w 4�K.�4e.42.5,624,576, 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-TOP VIEW 1O DCrO'er'' . IMPROVEMENT MG!2.5 MDTO®GM WO PTO[.>R `rOeDGM .0 4G4l.ON.s U+5>L. 02000 CONTEON N`bmwalw salons m NoNG 02000 CONTECH Slo nTwer r SauOOro 02000 COWTECM S or maar Sauto,M 3 PAD 58.> r. ■`I � ��Ft'• STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER Twr.n \lI��IJ° STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER A. \_!7'_CA STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER �5 av \ Y� PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS 1 G 1"! SECTION VIEWS �0i� �Z ° SiORMWATER STORMWATE 2 TOP VIEW,NOTES AND DATA 3 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR OR STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT STOIaVNVATER ��SOWf10N5_ IN \_ (SOLUTIONS_ STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT TKIAFD. SOLUTIONS_ mole Answer DATE owe IAxe tow I PLENhOceeetaon IONNW4MAF Iocom,ANG m.4m.e.m.” wTC,wta IwM:sow Ina NNC er•T4an Iwoo NN I CHECCEO 47.2 m,44-747_74aearcral, DAM„m<F IRI.Ne.NOME 12152 rare cswt•on. Ia.nw..ism know,re XI �`" plS+ 11 �a• {114>Z�i N APPROVED- X`16 - ; 44r. �L y ECG _ •AVED PARKING �T 1s•c '�~ MATTING . = LOT �EXPIRESW 2/31/13i ' RIVER ROCK 2' -3/4= 2.5"- 3•DEEP �:�r • !,.,'.• s rnr';. ..I`' . .4I?^� SWALE BOTTOM ,• 'v-7�..., � IOITS ilp0003 • r,•.- V MIN. '� THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY O /.I�.. �+ OIOTHOUTD IOtEWRITTEN PERMISSION �• 1 - i A USED DR REPRODUCED N ANY MANNER. REVISIONS S, REVISION DELTA Ilmomuiriwwr 12'DRAIN R.• � CLOSING CLOSING DATE DATE',it 16 GR. NG MEDIUM' 1 IN PROGRESS 6•MIN. 5• MIN. swALE AREA FREEBOARD TREATMENT AREA FREEBOARD BUFFER/ALITIGATION AREA 6'MINIMUM WIDTH AREA AREA EC MATTING ECONOJUTE• COCONUT FIBER OR GEOAITE PLU ECONOJUTE• ECONOJUTE•(5>20%) • SEED MIX LOW GROW MIX NONE LOW GROW MI) AS APPROVED BY SEE NOTE/5 SEE NOTE 0 DISTRICT OR CITY MAX. SLOPE I 3:1 3:1 1 FLAT BOTTOM 4:1 4:1 NA •OR AS APPROVED NOTES: 1. REFER TO APPENDIX A CWS DESIGN•CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS.FOR LANDSCAPING SHEET TITLE; REOUIREMENTS INCLUDING TREE PLACEMENT.TOPSOIL AND PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS DUAL. 2. JUTE Sl IRRIGATION JT APPROVED IN TREATMENT CWS 4IGPAL 1 3. FATE CS.COCO T FIBER PLUS IO CEBL AREA ECONOJUTE FOR ALL OTHER AREAS.OR SIMNM F2-RICH.COCONUT FIBER IS ALSO LACED ACCEPTABLE 4. 12-INCHES!A TOPSOIL SHALL DWARF PLACED THROUGHOUT UE 0%DWARF WATER MENIAL RYE TRACT. S FREEBOARD IL BENT GRASS MIX APPLY TAIL RATE OF 12R.DWARF PERENIµRYE 7014 CREEPING RED FESCUE 25% COLONIAL BENT GRASS S1E APPLY AT A RATE OF 120//ACRE 0 LIDA SWALE KO N.T.S. DRAWN BY MH CHECKED BY MWB SHEET: C8.2 JOB NO. 21N30079 0 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 VA/��N/ _____ __ __ \ \ mn \\ \ , \ \\-,\\ \\\\,. \ \ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __\ ‘ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ ,,,,,- Z \1 m , \\.\\X\ 8 0 , r-z \ rn o� \ ■ — - - - f \ 5 ......:%.0 0% ..., ar.r� wr `, WI ...4%\ 10" If 0 0 .1., ■ N._ .. ,,„ g (7) v::,-,:i) w.. [ .w. 1 oil 0 .. o0 %:\ ;� ) 1 I v \ Z�. `il L 0 , 12 ra I.\ ss I 4_,__ mom ill./: N I v ■N \N - , ier ipso \ \)) : ,,, '3 41, . -- "Q `\ Noll\ 1/ a ! iP4' Do gg C se - \\ ii 'PAY D any■ , \ I S I •..\`\ . , II N-• W N :i,:',..-.‘: \ .'ig , m 6 ,. 0,.. . ... N...;, • C ' P ... p (/ �m z m[O 1 ' O > SA h � Ix ti I � el e� 5 D ii it y b cL i nbC c x y D to o�-°^ —I °S a2 A Om MO 12 po ?y ;TN. D „r0 ` mA; ON gr. I i0 0 c, c g G io > _ r ,,�T2y m D> -1333 y 2$P y �=V ° 0). b� Cp. Q ny mx ml; s S ym ^ezm y ° oz c o y( RR A y Jy A s m$ > ICO ° g > m -31 ril�4 o yY rbsk y? c E 0 Q vq v r'> f � m o b p O Z s = y4„G ; N D g��O OA > I Z -< j1 O p N N m'H Z D w n %',.2,1'O N H H N ° 1.-•n S Z 0 Zc yZ y2 � B '�Z O O - O O Z Ofl O0 On Pr y y y y O ED D > m tfi r I rn w > il D0.TAa' g o co "I' G R O U P• m i N ag og --�� ACKENZIE r p m pCpn ; �~g; �� Nm CM Engineering Architecture j rrt t TL•I 0_tX A IE Structural Engineering Interior Deelgn Transportation Planning Land Use Planning moo$ $ ,$, 4? g eV Landscape Architecture Portland OR Vancouver WA Seattle WA - -1161 - $ _ 503 224 9560 360.696.7879 206.749.9993 / C CO ' cc <W■ 3 W CI / �' co le Y r j m a � 4 A O i m 2 9 W �•.' PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE_SN BOSIZE/ ' :;;;COSPACING t W 3^TF `o 1 EXISTING TTO RAIN AS SHOWN 3 EXISTING STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN c_O Q` p // �i \ W.. O // 4 - C G A 9 O , .1 V C N W V q+ S N •� 12 ZELKOVA SERRATA 2-CAL. B!B :q g Ol 0 / ' ,jj / ZELKOVA AS SHOWN V. 0...., d m /// /7, Clint I f // LEGEND /i///,/7/ i/� / — - - / j� / / j�/ :::::::::M:U::.. . .. . ....... 0 ; _ U e `. ye, i J• \_' \ SrTE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE 'N `. — 1 / \ -- \ •� -/ TOTAL SITE AREA: 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) i ' \ G TOTAL TREE CANOPY COVERAGE: 79,406 SF (1.75 AC) 36.4% ',0:, ` ' / *.>,.� I �,. m %// 36.4%IS GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM 33%TOTAL QUALIFYING EFFECTIVE TREE CANOPY 0 i / . jj I COVER FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT SITE THEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. Project\ _ X _ /�', - //�//// /�/�/��// /,•- // IMPROVEMENT TENANT '� /�% �'�"°� '� �11PROVEMENT 11\ 9,,. isss SW TECH cam DR ...., .... . I � �/\�/ �1 TgARD,OR.,i, EXISTING GRAVEL A / ��z .,„„,,, , , LOT ;; `: ,.„. 1 I( a� \ /= / EXISTING BUILDING .5 ' 1 ,a — / —$ V / ■i� • ,/ ,� � _ TA@I!G , —�n / GROW YACkENZIE 2013 /// / I I \1 Y / TNEO DRAWINGS 01�T C PRROPEPTY OF / MAN DULW , ��� GPOLF MACkENZIE AND ARE NOT TO RE \ • USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. 1 / I / _-� /: . WIT4WT PRIOR MITTEN PERMISSION 1 /7 ----, II„. 7: 1 e REVISIONS: 0 I II ` ' // \ • 1 �RlT9p15 RENSION DELTA I ///%%% M1J•DDO Sr 11R5 0205040 DATE �/ J - 0 SHEET .IN PROGRESS .... A, 4 i . \ ,, -- 111111LUMFIENIAMEIRMICONNSW44.1.9' ` ///,,-��C/a.is.c.s��s»r,�.. \\ //l 6;4, ! 44 '! d$}eil �/ 71: - i/� /�� — �,� /� SHEET TITLE Ji LG G ���������... TREE CANOPY L SITE PLAN 1 0 , . \ .. ,;„,. ,.....,,,., A, AO - ///i1 ` /�. i 0% •i i. ,! ___ 30 0 16 30 60 120 DRAWN BY:TED ' \ IJY i% - CHECKED BY: BBL i \ \ , — (INF T1 SHEET: 1 inch= 90 ft SW TECH CENTER DR D if 1 TREE CANOPY SITE PLAN L2.2 SCALE: 1 .= 30' - JOB Na 030079.00 00 . MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/t1/13' ��797W PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE TREE CANOPY TABLE SYMBOL # BOTANICAL NAME - SIZE/ AVERAGE MATURE TREE# SPECIES OPEN SOIL VOLUME COVERED SOIL VOII TAL SOIL VOLUME AVERAGE MATURE CANOPY R OF CANOPY OVER PARKIN 1REA OVER PARKING LOT c° a C c <w COMMON NAME SPA MG CANOPY SPREAD c c 3 0 al r om TREES 01 ZELKOVA 345 CF 1,062 CF 7,407 CF 50'SPREAD (7,963 SF) 599, 1,158 SF ? O o 02 ZELKOVA 261 CF 1,203 CF 1,464 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 72% 1,422 SF m 0 7 N 7 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN 40'SPREAD (1.256 SF) - 03 ZELKOVA 261 CF 1.203 CF 7,464 CF 50' SPREAD (1.963 SF) 72% 1,420 SF u_2 C Q J 04 ZELKOVA 1,194 CF 0 CF 1,794 CF 50' SPREAD (1.963 SF) 84% 1,645 SF Q 5 EXISTING STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN 50'SPREAD(7,963 SF) 3 n 05 ZELKO VA 261 CF 1,206 CF 1,467 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 88% 1,718 SF o IT 06 ZELKOVA 204 CF 1,125 CF 1,329 CF 50' SPREAD (1.963 SF) 71% 1,400 SF c m 0,y ... . ` 07 ZELKOVA 327 CF 1,125 CF 1,329 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 81% 1,587 SF c c« a ; 12 ZELKOVA SERRATA 2" CAL. Bd® 50' SPREAD (7,963 SF) c c ZELKOVA AS SHOWN m 08 ZELK OVA 1.767 CF 0 CF 1,767 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 729. 1,414 SF a p c i \ _ 09 ZELKOVA 327 CF 1,185 CF 7,512 CF 50'SPREAD (1.963 SF) 80R 1,580 SF o. is 0 c I's m m o 10 ZELKOVA 7,767 CF 0 CF 7,767 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 729. 1,408 SF a : a V. :.ic n m C N 11 ZELKOVA 804 CF 960 CF 1,764 CF 50' SPREAD(1.963 SF) 839. 1,627 SF - E o ^w 2-«. c of 12 ZELKOVA 7,650 CF 0 CF 1,650 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 777. 7,574 SF l7 0 c0 It 3 a 2 ` 13 EXISTING 2,979 CF 0 CF 2,979 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 Sr) 33% 653 SF Client \ 14 EXISTING 2.979 CF 0 CF 2,979 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 27% 562 SF 15 EXISTING 2,979 CF 0 CF 2.979 CF 50' SPREAD (1.963 SF) 325 624 SF - - - - _ _ 16 EXISTING 3.027 CF 0 CF 3,027 CF 50' SPREAD (1,963 SF) 309. 590 SF ILI / \ 17 EXISTING 3,081 CF 0 CF 3,081 CF 50' SPREAD (1.963 SF) 28% 558 SF +•.- ---/K _ __ // \ 18 EXISTING 345 CF 891 CF 1,236 CF 40' SPREAD(1,256 SF) SAX 1,107 SF 1 Ye, �' I I q, -S r _ . -- / _ TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE 21,981 SF , I I 'IF' ,, \ I CANOPY AREA wl \ O7 l �� � a �5 6 I \ � I/ LEGS D / �ww pOCA%/ / //// / z!// -/� I - - - INDIVIDUAL MATURE TREE CANOPY OUTLINE Prose /, // ;%/7///��/ �/ Lags TENANT _ �' /�i �PROVEMENT / �� �, QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COVER 1 r. va �'• OPEN SOIL VOLUME 'x ,n ��� 7566 SW 71.1 CENTER DR TI�AFC.OR Erg �\ I Tom. COVERED SOIL VOLUME EXISTING GRAVEL _ I , LOT --- PARKING LOT AREA BOUNDARY 7,-,' i i I I ,, 08 1 ��; I PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY COVERAGE DATA \C' _ / #- EXISTING BUILDING V I, PARKING LOT AREA 71,103 SF \i ./ TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE TREE CANOPY AREA: 21,981 SF i// ___ p •\ R CANOPY CO VER: 31x -- - / 0 II j/ I 1 MINIMUM %CANOPY COVER: 30% ; ]] j 1 / -E1AR»;; 31%IS GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM OF 30%TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COVER /( -\-. �A1 THEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. jj GROUP MAC"gE 3013 !H 0 \ >�r V A 1 .CANOPY AREA PER TREE IS DETERMINED FROM THE VALUE GIVEN IN THE CITY OF TIGARD © ALL RION75 RESER�D PARKING LOT TREE LIST FOR A MATURE TREE OF THAT SPECIES. THESE MACKENZ ARE THE RE 01 0 9F I �\ / KM {R SOD MACKENZE AND ARE NOT TO BE Y AS USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. WITHOUT PRIOR WI TEN PERMISSION 1 �!7) --. i REVISIONS ■ I PARKING LOT TREE SOL VOLUME REOUffS �• - / / TFrrY-'� - REYISItM REVISION DELTA k A AAA DOOR s` nns cEOSwc DAZE / �4AI I MINIMUM SOIL VOLUME REQUIREMENT(CF PER TREE) 1,000 CF '�o sHET ii : _ _ __ --- /- /2.,/ I 1 X 1N PROGRESS _,,,,,/ - ..:-�._ ,--n1I ODOR/ / �. / 1 I I \ I ,4_& _eEe»sey�leCRSeerosar \ 1 \ / LI P Z U SHEET TITLE. e S Z---„ PARKP4G LOT I Tfi�CANOPY PLAN "�Tr"'� P 14 '� 15 \ 16 l/ 17 d I••• - CHECKED BY. RML SW lECH(� \ � � � AIM CENTER I SHEET k'T .- 30 0 5 30 60 130 / _--- _ ._ �y a __ -A. Q7 FEET) I inch= 30 It O PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY PLAN JOB NO SCALE 1' - 30' L2.3 2130079.� MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 C a a • c c 3 a -m m y m m a 70 r< ?O INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REOUIRED a o m o BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT. SCH 40 MAINLINE t c v m°'o.GATE VALVES, UNIONS k SCH. 80 NIPPLES VALVE BOX A ¢c m AND ELL TO BE SAME SIZE AS VAULT WITH LOQ(ABLE AND COVER: BACKFLOW PREVENTER. LID AMAETEK 71X17 WITH GREEN < LID IN LAWN AREAS AND ; ISOLATION VANE BROWN LID IN SHRUB AREAS SCH 80 ADAPTER«FITIINGS TO BE m FINISH GRADE SAME SIZE AS ISOLATION VALVE FINISH GRADE p m DOUBLE CHECK VALVE VALVE BOX WITH c a c . © i_iri u�•= 4•PVC SLEEVE el �'- ° m rD Ml•II 11•i UNION EACH SIDE 119. 17 LOCKABLE LID > _ FINISH GRADE a m ::::P:T ::::::: 'I VALE -11.11-IIC11�11' 11-11-11-11-11- a=1X1=11211=1 c l RuCERSm W ER -11° .=11- _ _ _ _ i�4.L! 1�� BOTH SIDES m "- 111.A1►,I r N SCH Irll-11-11-11"117,4_� t,!�SIC�!�: -- 7 c_�?m d e I.f� i1_ 4 . ,..:' -IIk-IICIIgIICI �I :r_u unit m m 1 n TYP. IICIICIIC11ZI1 11-�i1 DRAIN ROCK- r / MAINLINE a.j m e GATE VALVE ill Ii- PIIr11M1•:11Z114■=! =: 71;EIIO! IICIImur.lir1t:...%:!•%;,-•,:i imli l_!e11 o s� ° • ii 1111 SCH 40 MAINLINE 11E11C=.'j•� .i:iLi IPA 3 CU.FT. MIN. Z11=11IICII�:!::•:•®ICZ 1dP11C11 ISOLATION/GATE VALVE, w «M cc I • �WI. ICIICIP ■1rn4 .„nra11C1 er EQUIPPED FOR KEYED >., QUICK COUPLER •_! nol 11-IICIICIICII-4••F•c:dP11Cp -11-11CIP1111C11=11112∎Miairr.11- W o w i-_1 a.°n BRICK OR CONCRETE _ 1111CIICI1:11=11=11=11=1P112=11! OPERATION -uouaer_ enenoo-ouenu_ 9:a1 i BLOCK TIP. 11 11C II C ICIC!:4%:%=!=11 11-11 -1111 CIICII=IP 1111CIC11C11C1i011 C 4'MIN.DRAIN ROCK 1=11=1111:11== CIICIPIP11=11: Cu.ot: CInIIOIC1:A=eeae1=191BLS' 1=11EIIC11C11C11•= !;1_!=•:CIC1C1 11I�IC11=11:11_11=1t1111C11CtIC1�1111-1111-11:∎:O:••:•: 11-11-11 BRICK OR CONC.BLOCK DRAIN ROCK 4'DEEP IIr11r11■11IICIICIICIICI=L=AI 11 11 MAINLINE 111=11∎11C11C11∎:i•:∎G ..211 II=I CICICICICICIICICIC IC IC L=IC ICICICICmii..t11-n-.:N=n-1 - - - - - - - - - A I C 111 C I I-1-1-1-I C I C I t C n C I IICIICIICIICIICIICIICIICIICIICII LLI 49 POINT OF CONNECTION BACKFLOW PREVENTER MANUAL DRAIN VALVE ISOLATION/GATE VALVE kir SCALE NTS : BELOW GRADE SCALE NTS SCALE NTS : SCALE: NTS VALVE BOX WITH COVER FINISH GRADE/TOP OF FINISH GRADE MULCH WICK-COUPLING VALVE MI AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PAVING CLEAN AND LIGHTLY @ WITH LOCKABLE DOOR Project COMPACTED BACKFlLL LaCle TENANT 3 INCH MINIMUM DEPTH �4 ri I .. OF 3/4 INCH WASHED i J ' COMMON AOND CONTROL GRAVEL j TRACKING TAPE 8' ABOVE PIPE ��' WIRES 70 EXTEND 8' 0 BRICK }I— ow�o. .�I�r.. BEYOND EDGE OF BUILDING U � i11� 11=111—� Il����el I CONDUIT FOR 120 VOLT 75 1D t�DR PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE = CLEAN BACKFiLL 111—III'j -�tl-111 LATERAL LINE ELECTRICAL SERVICE WITH Jf !ittTlIr PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL i M ' r'9i ='//� JUNCTION BOX • II_III 1 / WA•., PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL � W� I M' TRACKING TAPE 8'ABOVE 9_ Ill=llli 5011=1”-mi T��I_III BUILDING WALL 3 " �! SLEEVE _�IN�1 II W.-� MAINLINE BUILDING FLOOR o — it SCH 40 PVC SLEEVE 111=I�1�i✓ 1 SWEEP ELL ON ALL■"' ��' .=111=� �-g111= = ,; gp ELECTRICAL CONDUf7 PVC MAINLINE PIPE ®�•'-' ALL WIRE TO BE ry 11-111 1.._..._•ll-III-1 .� PVC SCH 40 ELL �� • _, III_III_III_III Ii. .'a� ATTACH IRRIGAToN WIRE 1: i` INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL TO MAINLINE AT i • ELECTRICAL CODE. ■ 11=11=wr 11 2"X 2"REDWOOD STAKE NOTE: INTERVALS OF 25'-0" 2�/�����i1 VERIFY LOCATION PRIOR WITH STAINLESS STEEL EXTEND IRRIGATION = 70 INSTALLATION. GEAR CLAMPS SLEEVES 18"BEYOND EACH SIDE OF PAVING. INSTALL CONTROLLER PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. SEE © GROUP MlOItENLE 2013 SPECS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ®QUICK COUPLING VALVE 03)IRRIGATION SLEEVES AT PAVING ®IRRIGATION TRENCH WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER A ARE .E P PROPERTY USED OR OF SCALE: NTS SCALE NTS SCALE NTS CO SCALE NTS wrINOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION COILED WIRE REVISIONS: WATERPROOF CONNECTION 110/01010 DEMON DELTA VALVE BOX WITH COVER B aifT CLOWN wtc FINISH GRADE/TOP OFF I IN PROGRESS MULCH PAVEMENT OR CURB REMOTE CONTROL VALVE r MIN. TOP OF SPRINKLER FLUSH PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE 3 MAX WITH FINISH GRADE,AFTER PVC SCH 40 ELL SETTLING \... •`-1—_�' FINISH GRADE /✓f PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE iii. , 1",.4.,;;;,,,,,,,_::.. �l�ilT R070R POP-UP SPRINKLER T �' I �o T BRICK TYP. i� \eN POP-UP SPRINKLER SHEET TITLE. T ��"" a.\�y PVC SCH 40 NIPPLE RRIQATION S /N4' -n LENGTH AS REQUIRED �f�S �� rr T 4i PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL �� �i i��� iii � � BARBED MARLEX INSERT L11b _ 1 I I I,.IiI 1' T,'y �1�� h r� i1�A� y �� tr THREADED ELL �? ) -��� SCH. 80 NIPPLE AND SCH. . ^ " PVC SCH 40 ELL 1•�!a.1 1 fk, 40 ELL V ` *�'^ POLY H MAX PIPE-MIN. 15' �W4,4� �� Y}' �'r/' ■1 'l LENGTH MA 30�LENGTH PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL ' t. PVC MAINLINE PIPE �,/' `� !, 5 '�AI,.. G0'4'''�c' hI `'Y BARBED MARLEX INERT '.,_`Al ! i / .'i, �-haft k THREADED ELL 1' PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH. 40 MALE 4✓i,.``a`,,is,`., -�2> - ,1> vial:- !PIA ADAPTER 80 TEE � DRAWN BY TES PVC LATERAL PIPE LATERAL LINE PVC LATERAL PIPE CHECKED BY RML 3 MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL SHEET: e ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE e SPRAY POP-UP SPRINKLER ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER L811 SCALE. NTS NTS SCALE: NTS JOB NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODFICATION SUBMITTAL— 6/11/13 ,... ,, ,:, ., ...„, F 2 EDGE OF GROUNDCOVER f Ji .,C, AREA/WALK EDGE - IV 3 r lam��'►((.� �,C DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS ',_ i741r1 HOSE CHAFING GUARD SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL ��4,10• 1/2 7HE SPECIFIED O.0 r^��ii'''1 A ABOVE FINISH GRADE • SPACING .� GUY CABLE AND REMOVE BURLAP AND ROW EDGE OF SHRUB GRWNDCOVER c c'� TWINE FROM TOP HALF •�► AREA/WALK EDGE c j ro rf 2 OF ROOTBALL MI-SPACE, AT SPECIFIED C joM `a .T. 2 x 2 x✓! WOOD STAKE • O.C. DISTANCE- ,'� DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS ''1 2 P U �� KEEP CLEAR OF ROOTBALL `,� MULCH, 2'DEPTH EQUIDISTANT •� • 1/2 THE SPECIFIED O.C. a c c¢ c \ PLANT CENTER .4 / SPACING D SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL L r 3 r ABOVE FINISH GRADE \I _ .. FINISH GRADE Al ROW c m AND REMOVE BURLAP AND �iw'C�ia4 w'�.'�''.F �•1rA�A�,�,�!�%t! EQUI SPACE. AT SPECIFIED = _ l 1 WIRE BASKETS FROM TOP IrN=n—u -11=11=11.�11• MULCH. 2'DEPTH x M' HALF OF ROOTBALL I II 11. 11=1 1-11-11- FERTILIZER TABLETS ° ,. • O.C. DISTANCE- ;�� i e iiiEQUIDISTANT Ct — FERTILIZER TABLETS III-III-_-111111.11711111=111111�111111111.11a111 71 111(-1 COMPACT PLANTING SOIL _ =111-I1_- I - — _ - PLANTING SOIL II 1=111=j1 iTi l II IIII IIi!IIII I� NATIVE SOIL _ _ !=1 1=71 I�1i� NATIVE SOIL LLI COMPACT PLANTING SOIL NATIVE SOIL ®TREE PLANTING - DOUBLE STAKE Q CONTAINER/B+B SHRUB PLANTING 3 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER SPACING Yer SCALE. NTS SCALE. N75 L8.2 SCALE: NTS SCALE NTS Project Lame TENANT IMPROVEMENT 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR TIGARD,OR GROUP MACNENZIE 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERTED 'HESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY Of CROUP MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. WITHOUT PRIOR MITTEN PERMISSION REVISIONS: ti.11901W REVISION DELTA To N CLOSDN7 DATE 1' IN PROGRESS SHEET TITLE NQ DETM S DRANK BY TEB CHECKED BY RML SHEET: L8.2 1 1 JOB NO. 21300790 00 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 -• , • - ' '' • 4-, - , - • .,..,-. • , . ., , . . . . .. _,'. . ,•.. ....-..:, - .,-.2, : .. • •..,,,•=t- '',•;;- ,--i)%; 4540. .. - t. " - ' -,, - 4.7 .+-.,,,;-:',"f". . -, ' 4Y: :,.•1,-..;-,..#!7' , ••., 4i.:._ , __ _ ..t,,,,.,,,,,_.,.'•-•,.•- - ‘7...-..,,',..„;,-, r -,. 1.•.;''''',.:,.• e----,• 'ts.,„.4? ,..i.-.-- '.*".,;..- .• -- .. . ,....... ,,-, -,:t„4., •,-....;-;. 4,,,!.......k.,„-*,;..,,....;. . .--„,,,,..-!...,It&• ,....„,...4.-„:....! .,;:L..; .‘•,.,..-r„,,.,.. .. - -... -•,,'J.";••,,,,L •' ''' '0.r-tIk'''"''''''''''' ... •,,...,...!- ..?.,',... ,.:-."4,-; •-;:,'--1.1”':', ;' ".•••• '., :-•■1"..7! - . 7„fr."'"..-',:--',.• ••;,..F+:1,..,-,, ,,;.,,, 1454;,- i-.--...-T..- "-' . ... • ..:....:, • , .i:1.-..','.....`,.:-...:t,......4-.:',•:•::.',:-...'...7.7.,:z.,,'.,,,,'N'.:,,-...:,....:.74,,,-,„:-..i4t,,..., ..=';'.17...7-`1,!:,',-.::::,•'''.t:....,::.'!„-,,....:7::-•,:i..-,,,C.,,. .":=.,.........,:,.<::,7.1:4,;?,:14-•-_,.,:::•:,...,Ptti., i.L.•- ,,,...• 1::,...*•-. ,,:.- • "Ati, . .... . . ., , ..., .,. . . - • : , • - - . •,•,-...,.4;4,,411..,,...4-. '..44t4.4*!,." ..,4. .. . . ,.- 4. -, . • „its.4/4 4.4{) '1,440'4;,, -, :,..,f.''4'4 -••• :','4 , ,,,, ,, . , , , ,,,,,,......,..,*...4,, .. .„• ' ' .• • . . . •;•W.,';71'•- - •. ""' offile' .: ' •,' • ''" ...- - • • -;•ri-' P^1..-i 7=:.-.. ,. . , - . '0„:Lktl .:'..!.,.....'?" " t• ''''''' - , ,.... - _ ,. . . ... •• - . - ....- - . ._ . .. , ' -vf ro-_,.• ...-'.‘'.t...-','..,-.$... ...,:,,-.:, ,.:',-.,,...-J.:. „. -. .11 • •,I .. .. . ., . .. ... 11, ..,-• .........,s, , 4,4. * *•, -- - . ;.",,,• 4 . t.4 4, 124: '4.1 44.4 4.-..4:1Fi r'a,7"1,4:-'.'.•-,•,4:,r,;4 ',:''.x."''',,:,'",,''A...,'''-':''•",....,!'-•'.,*',-•'."V`'"'.":''1''-•''.'r'.'',•t•r='.'-,'7'-''-''',.'':'','-.;*i.r."-'•-• -,-,•••.-,t.'V-.4.W e"..'t.4,-s--'..-..'•'•',' '•.' '''''.•-- - '441E-•••*-.,',..4111 ...." ••• ' " ' ':•,..!.---'. .-.:_40,..4.14•"• ....i„.......-„,,-..7.-•.• ,. . .„ • ..-, . . ' ,-;!,,,,,,,,,. •76,v4.-.•,--T.,•-•-, ...„-• •-,..... -,. . - -'• . •-,•••••.-• •cr,,,,,-; „ ..•.-•,.i. ..,..., ,. . ., ... •. ..4-- -'- . -,.--,-,-.4.m.,..,,,...-...f0,1•;;.. -,....,, , ''' '' • - •• ""'''.i 'r •° :.,, ••*4%*•-.:.,--.,- • , ......„ ,,,. . .,, •---.,,4,..i'' ' " ' ••,-,••_!_,R.. . . .. . • .--...1, `-'-.•-v.,t-•-4°---,,,444,,trok,,,..tr="......,,,„, , . . .. ,,••-• , ..... ----.- -- , . , . % ::, .., .....,dgcl.,,..,...•,,,,-....„ . ,.....1. :. •..- -- . 7'.i.,4!...!...,,..:;,. .:::,.. .,-. ..c -,-„oi.,..-.:,,•i:.?",,..;,,,,,,v54,-41- 1,04.,.-„t44,..tioor4F-,7,--,1,0.4-4,- ,, ",'•-1,--,'- , .. ' - ---'4';••••41- ,'-•-•'7'Aiti- .■;',` . ,...,..',.. '.,., ,..•:, . .... ............r... .0006000... 44.60.000.0= ... .. ,.• . . . • -•k. ' ',- . . •.. . • . . ...,„.. . „ ...;...,;•:.. , . ..,..,,, ... !,:...Ne.•,:'?'.,,:. ,,,' .. !„, , ", ,• . .. ' . , ; 1.?W:: .i, . . • ..4:AA' ,a1,71,. i . . . •• . , . 1'&',Y•':.' I . ... ...“. „ . ‘,. ,P,0„ : t .31,T'.141*:kr''..'.,Ire.1P. .1. . ..... .., 'll'''..7'' • * ''' - .1 -____.4,_„_ -.4--------- .,' ... • ..,.s , _., .. , . . ,.., . . oy.",_:.,,-... _..o....-•;,..o..„..,,..4 .c,•, •-,*-,,,,a,i .,,,j44. .4.41`.• .;-' *4,4 4. . ' •N•' . . , --- -. -.,--ac • -.' ,,,-..-w... _, .,-* - •:„.• L.,1,,,' . • ,L." , -ir - '.•.,.--t..., ••• --)'. 7.r.3.,...It' .. 44. 1414. ...',k, ft'.' - •'- .7''' .'A t.'''' ' ..-,;.",, ' i k•:.-10,.‘, "X,' .•:." .•le 47-- _ . -, ''' ',',I.' ' l'le ' fib ' , ..... . , i,. . ei ' • 1: . t ...! i • - . .• • ',_ 1 ....,:. \ • . . : • , . _ •. . \ . • ....: , ... - 44...41!• ' ' .. ' '' • ..f ., ., . 44'•.' '-14 ' ,4•.... , ., , , • • ,' • ! ..I}..kt . .. . .. . s.. ■ 1......!,. . , lc ..' ..,.;'‘.:'I!' '' ■ 7.'- :• v. . ., ., •e -...-.. .•, .- i, 4 . '_!.. .4 - 01'4..' ' ..,1 i ..., ,,,',- lot UI • 44 4 1 .. -. t.: ••,t • ,. ••if#, -c -••‘ t • •''' -.'7,..4-.;.• '4 , , - " •..-, A . • , ' .1.-A44 ft' .,. - 14' •,'•:•` •• '''' - ••• '. . , . .- „".•s . • •-•10.... - 1'. '''''''4-..:, . ' -4.:. •.:- -t.:-..-. , . - ' .. •-, " '. .,... . • . Vii ..':41•11: . , .., . • . • . ''' ' er.-.1" 1-4: ' *-A.-40.' -. • 11;" . ..., ' - -..--410- + . , ,.. - • eV - - • itt- . • ..., ". - ,,,,,,„„ 1,....., .44•'414:sit , -1 i . , . . ....., - . -.... , .,... ;14 • . - ■••■ - . . ,41.1..41 --;40.. ,:: • ; /144 it: ` n ., ..'... .-. . ,,t ,i,ii I . •.:,1. _ . - :-....,-.. , „,../ 114.•'lif N--v...'.• ''. . , . '" -' - .(4,'• • . 4 • 1 . ^-i , , :. ' . °.".'-; '''`"t.. ,t.4: ,,',...i-",,..;" ,,,,,•4■ f'..•' . - 0",t i" • - A. „- , . - ,,,w,.4, .:1 .,.,...., . . ,-, . . .4 •4 4 .' . , '...' . .1. .. . . 41-4'. T. .11w ' .. ...44'4 4 i . ,, • . .4 .40 ,44'-.4.4.1 4' ' • '..)?' . • "" ' . '444., 4 4. ..4 4'. ' • . 444 N., ,• q• , • • . - . , •k- .., • ''' , -f'.....;.,.. ..' . •Y ,0W,i4,,,,,.. _ . - , , •'' 1. lti ie.7'' ' if '' * ''''"*Ik : .,7-i••,!, . * +.4 , .- .=,!..e. A s4- . ",.? 4 ;-',.., .1.' ,. ' . •* ; , 4,....,,,. -Or.",Ac i Gir...-,. .•..', . ._ ,, ,. . ',",":..;:'''. '.,' „4 •, .• ,..,'.,,. .4 .-• ''''.li ". ,e. N ' ' ',,P. 1'," 4 ''''1 f 1\' *ii, . , .. •r ,* 7• '-! '''' •140"."'• .. ‘ • - . .,••1/4, .••, ..,' ''''''• •'' . ' - l•• --•-,.,,,f. • • .... vr :••go 't../.• - • ' • ''V& ' ' . . .. ,,,,,,, . .. , -..... • ' '' .■ 4 . . . • -, ,. • 4: , °4.*4' • ' • . (Cr ,. 'f. ..-. ,•:4i. . . • . 'it ' ' ' ' i'i':°.- ' ''• 'e! Ai - • .., .-.•„:, 7.-"r '' , : , • . - •• . It'll .. , A s., •+' ,,..".• , • . -.. . ..., - - . ,%•,. , ..:,..„,..1) .k...4. '. •: ' , . /' 1 • • "•=•-•••••,-.••,.•.•::• !,' -•.- • . .,_ C y � tr ..A 0, ,.? , . • . le . i 4 . ,. "`.. s N .F Y.._',y + • • t' M I r a r" II ill p* R * I * D * E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 June 20, 2013 Ryan Schera Group Mackenzie 1515 SE Water Ave #100 Portland, OR 97214 Re: LaCie at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr We have reviewed the site plan for the compactor area at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr in Tigard. The compactor are has adequate space for straight on access for our trucks to access the compactors. There is no enclosure around the compactors. The compactors will sit parallel to the north side of the building, with access facing to the west. This placement will be acceptable to ensure our access of the compactors. Please note that the compactors will need to be compatible with our equipment. Also, the City of Tigard does have a permitting process for compactors. LaCie will need to get their compactor permits from the city before these can be installed. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kristin Leichner Pride Disposal Co. (503) 625-6177 kristinl@pridedisposal.com -f------t / N &'f° fl oil'. X c)-- ' _ = �- A� ®14 / / i ,::.ii,;.: 0 11 ..,.. r~ ...1•ig11211111I11X7 1 x O , c.', " pA II+' q0 ° ° 1 Vi i l —.. o , r 5;e. 0 1 • R Jo, 1:..:....... :1 © / d. > '�i3ii�iii`C�i' iciii■ \• ' • • ■ .. .,, •., 1---- '1., r,... • „ sg _ 4 ;.--.x.,:lz 011 -..;y- 0 00 0s, , ,,, I 4,3r.':'.a I.W/A, L if, 0 0 Nil __;\4t. ill 9 v '1 i 0 PHI 1 IT PrIg w p u gwF;iii °s1 LiI .5 i .a 5 b a o 6 , 0 , © �: 'g 11�� € �u �$ �� 9 1 O 11 w 99]] � i "1-• y�.k_ .• >t{ V° \\rA �\ &\\• 1 i IJT i1ii !! 11iii!ø1!1d 9 IX %1N/ Pgi g t1J rah ° 5Alifl 111. -: Al AO s 8 D p • r r r r r P X P P; Pt i F ;F ri P; ; a w ►C R i i of i q p p ¢ E tl ; gg g i a I 1(1 l! ;'( 11$1gl 41111i/OP-APIII4P / li lAli it�, � �I aF iilLibt s° 1 a ` i @ € 41gagi6" II ' sag 1 QA - 11 1111111114 ,11 at '� SaB$ ii !git. gb pa I u gY � � sa _ 71 .§.....6.643 as a � g v 6 �a § �' w ��a :-� pp b i ' 4_ {R� ! - pp F te g G 6 b iP 8 G E tEE.4..4. I ' 4 P a it GI Id H l7k:,;!I6 R 0 ll P � g � g — ACKENZIEI rl N k ymym I } I �rt� GM[nCMwMY MMX.eM1 Naming :03."wa.r•n•n n I , a ;:::° :.°a.6�.:" 11;:..:«5 Kristin Leichner From: Ryan Schera <RSchera @grpmack.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:23 AM To: Kristin Leichner; 'jason @wessconw.com' Subject: RE: LaCie at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr Attachments: 079-C2-1_TRASH COMPACTOR MOVE_061813.pdf Kristin, We have revised our site plan to reflect Jason's drawing. See Attached. Assuming the drawing is acceptable, what is a realistic time we could expect the sign off letter? -Ryan From: Kristin Leichner [mailto:kristinl @pridedisposal.com] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 11:35 AM To: Ryan Schera; 'jason @wessconw.com' Subject: LaCie at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr Ryan and Jason, We've been talking to both of you about this LaCie compactor area. I wanted to get you both included on the same e- mail. The PDF I attached is the 2 different drawings you've each provided to us (page 1 from Ryan, page 2 from Jason). We met with Jason on site to discuss where these compactors will need to be located. Ryan, what you're sending me will not work for layout. We don't have enough space to maneuver our trucks up to the compactors the way you have them drawn out. Please refer to Jason's drawing for the changes that need to be made. The compactors need to be turned so they run parallel to the wall rather than perpendicular to it. Hopefully this makes sense to everyone. I figured it was easier to get us all involved in the conversation. Ryan, if you can provide me an updated drawing reflecting these changes I can work on that sign off letter for the City of Tigard. Kristin Leichner Office Manager Pride Disposal Co. (503)625-6177 1 •1 . ■ TIGARD City of Tigard June 24, 2013 Group Mackenzie Attn: Ryan Schera 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland, OR 97214 RE: Completeness—7555 SW Tech Center Drive Case File No. SDR2013-00003 LaCie Dear Mr. Schera: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR2013-00003) to modify the existing industrial building, associated landscaping and site improvements to accommodate a new light industrial use, LaCie Corporation. The development site is located at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that your application was complete as of June 20`h for the purpose of beginning the 120-day review period for a final decision. The formal comment and review process typically takes 4 to 6 weeks. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2427. Sincerely, kipl.6 Agnes Kowacz Associate Planner cc: SDR20013-00003 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov II TIGARD City of Tigard July 8, 2013 Group Mackenzie Attn: Ryan Schera 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland, OR 97214 RE: Request for additional infromation—7555 SW Tech Center Drive Case File No. SDR2013-00003 LaCie Dear Mr. Schera: The City has received your application for a Site Development Review (SDR2013-00003) to modify the existing industrial building, associated landscaping and site improvements to accommodate a new light industrial use, LaCie Corporation. Upon review of your application materials, staff has determined additional information is needed in order to satisfy the requirements of TDC 18.745 Screening and Landscaping and TDC 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan. The Urban Forestry Plan should consist of a tree preservation&removal site plan, tree canopy site plan, and a supplemental report. The requirements for each of these components are found in Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual,which can be found at: http://www.tigard-or.gov/community/trees/dots/urban forestry manual.pdf). In addition, the project is required to provide 30% tree canopy directly over the parking lot. Please provide a plan in compliance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Species, size and existing canopy of existing trees shall be identified. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2427. Sincerely, Agnes Kowacz Associate Planner cc: SDR20013-00003 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Agnes Kowacz From: Agnes Kowacz Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:58 PM To: Ryan Schera (RSchera @mcknze.com) Subject: LaCie Attachments: Solid Waste Compactor App.pdf Ryan- While working on preparing the decision, I have noticed some additional items that need to be addressed. It would be better to address them now rather than to condition the decision with the requirements. Please address the following: 1. TDC 18.360.090- Items 9, 10, 11 2. The supplemental report/urban forestry plan shall be signed by an arborist or landscaped architect under the acknowledgement. The reports needs to provide: a general accounting of soil characteristics (such as are tree growth limiting soils on the site; Section 10, Part 3- I), protection measures during construction (Section 10, Part 3- F), and contact information of the landscape architect who prepared the plans/report. 3. According to the parking lot area of 71, 103 square feet, the parking lot trees do not provide the 30% required canopy. (30%of 71,103 is 21,331) 4. Based on the frontage of approximately 370 feet along Tech Center Drive, 9 street trees are required. It looks like 5 are provided between the two driveway and I counted an additional 1 (for a total of 6)just west of the furthest driveway. You can either provide an additional 3 or pay into the urban forestry fund. (This can be a condition). 5. TDC 18.705.030F (4)-address pedestrian lighting, specifically the area across the parking lot to the sidewalk on Tech Center Drive. Are there existing lights that will light that area, if not, additional lighting may be required (this also should be addressed in 18.360.090 item #10). i . 9 17.755.050C(3)-enclosure is required for exterior storage areas. An updated provider letter is required to ,iil/ ensure that the enclosure is compatible with Pride Disposal's equipment. Submit detailed drawings addressing this item. 7. In accordance with TMC 11.04.105, a compactor permit is required.(Attached) 8. 17.765.0401- wheels stops are required along the perimeter of the parking lot (the ones along the west side of the building are not required) and landscaped areas. Submit revised plans. 9. Lastly, the total canopy calculation doesn't appear to be correct. On page L2.2,the proposed new canopy is 12,790; however, the 14 newly planted trees would result in a total canopy of 27,482 square feet. You can have your landscape architect call me to discuss if necessary. Like I said, it would be best to address these issues now rather than have to condition the decision. If you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Thank you, Agnes Kowacz I Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 503.718.2427 agnesk@tigard-or.gov 1 1r �1 MACKENZIE . p DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED AUG 05 2013 . • PL,gNN! GA R p August 2, 2013 Cxlt�EE%VG City of Tigard Attention:Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LaCie Tenant Improvements Stationary Solid Waste Compactor Application/Permit Response Letter Project Number 2130079.00 Dear Ms. Kowacz: In response to your email dated 7/25/13, we have addressed the items below, with our responses following your comments. 1. TDC 18.360.090-Items I,J, K I. Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention. • 1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and 2. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: a. A deck,patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine, b. A trellis or arbor, c. A change in elevation or grade, d. A change in the texture of the path material, e. Sign, or f. Landscaping. Response: The site area is clearly defined along the north, west and east property boundaries by a combination of retaining walls, fencing and dense landscaping. Along the south property line (SW Tech Center Drive) the property is defined to be a grade/elevation change (berm) including a landscaped setback located between the street and the parking area and building.This standard is met. J. Crime prevention and safety. 1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Response: Windows/glazing exists and/or is proposed along the south and east elevations of the building. The placement and location of these windows affords building occupants the ability to observe activities occurring outside of the building.The intent of the standard is met. MP 503.224.9560 • F 503.228.1285 • W MCKNZE.COM • RiverEast Center,1515 SE Water Avenue,#100,Portland,OR 97214 ARCHITECTURE • INTERIORS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • Portland.Oregon • Vancouver,Washington • Seattle,Washington H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-LaCie Response Letter 130802.docx City of Tigard LaCie Tenant Improvements Response Letter Project Number 2130079.00 August 2, 2013 Page 2 2. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Response: No interior laundry services are proposed with this project.This standard does not apply. 3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; Response: The existing mailbox is located in the landscape island adjacent to the existing parking lot light pole.The lighting from the parking light pole illuminates the mailbox area.This standard is met. 4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime;and 5. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: Exterior lighting fixtures are located along each facade of the building. These fixtures are angled downward and provide lighting along the entire perimeter of the building and parking areas. In addition the parking area has parking lot lighting which overlaps with the building lighting. The intent of this standard is met. K. Public Transit. 1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; 2. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: a. The location of other transit facilities in the area,and b. The size and type of the proposal; 3. The following facilities may be required after city and TriMet review: a. Bus stop shelters, b. Turnouts for buses, and c. Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The nearest transit facility is bus line #38 which runs on SW 72nd Avenue, approximately 785 feet away from the site.The nearest bus stop is located at Sandburg Road &SW 72nd Avenue, approximately 967 feet away from the site.This standard does not apply. 2. The supplemental report/urban forestry plan shall be signed by an arborist or landscaped architect under the acknowledgement. The reports needs to provide: a general accounting of soil characteristics (such as are tree growth limiting soils on the site;Section 10, Part 3-i), protection measures during construction (Section 10, Part 3- F), and contact information of the landscape architect who prepared the plans/report. Response: The supplemental report/urban forestry plan has been revised per your comments above. See the revised plan.This comment is met. 3. According to the parking lot area of 71, 103 square feet, the parking lot trees do not provide the 30% required canopy. (30%of 71,103 is 21,331) Response:The calculation has been corrected.See the revised plan.This comment is met. IM • H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-LaCie Response Letter 130802.docx • u:. City of Tigard LaCie Tenant Improvements Response Letter x Project Number 2130079.00 August 2,2013 Page 3 4. Based on the frontage of approximately 370 feet along Tech Center Drive, 9 street trees are required. It looks like 5 are provided between the two driveway and I counted an additional 1 (for a total of 6)just west of the furthest driveway. You can either provide an additional 3 or pay into the urban forestry fund. (This can be a condition). Response:Three (3)additional street trees have been added to the landscape plans.This comment is met. 5. TDC 18.705.030F (4) - address pedestrian lighting, specifically the area across the parking lot to the sidewalk on Tech Center Drive. Are there existing lights that will light that area, if not, additional lighting may be required. Response: As stated above, the site has a combination of both building and parking lot lighting that provides lighting coverage for areas utilized by both vehicles and pedestrians. Exterior lighting fixtures are located along each façade of the building. These fixtures are angled downward and provide lighting along the entire perimeter of the building and " t'. parking areas. In addition the parking area has parking lot lighting which overlaps with the building lighting. More specifically, the walkway connecting the main entrance to the parking area and public sidewalk is lighted via a - combination of overlapping lighting from the building lighting at the main entrance and the parking lot lighting located near the walkway(four stalls over from the walkway/landscape island).The intent of this standard is met. 6. 18.755.050C(3)- enclosure is required for exterior storage areas. An updated provider letter is required to ensure that the enclosure is compatible with Pride Disposal's equipment.Submit detailed drawings addressing this item. Response: The applicant is in the process of getting an updated letter from Pride Disposal. The applicant requests this item to be a condition of the land use approval. 7. In accordance with TMC 11.04.105, a compactor permit is required. (Attached) Response: The applicant and property owner have signed the Compactor Application (see attached). 8. 18.765.040.J-wheels stops are required along the perimeter of the parking lot (the ones along the west side of the building are not required) and landscaped areas.Submit revised plans. Response: Wheels stops have been added along the perimeter of the parking area and landscape area in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J.See revised Sheet C2.1.This standard is met. 9. Lastly, the total canopy calculation doesn't appear to be correct. On page L2.2, the proposed new canopy is 12,790; however, the 14 newly planted trees would result in a total canopy of 27,482 square feet. You can have your landscape architect call me to discuss if necessary. Response:The calculation has been corrected.See revised Sheet L2.2.This comment is met. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, _..'11111 • -€rya n cc," l ail l Use Planner Enclosure: Signed Stationary Solid Waste Compactor Application/Permit M H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-LaCie Response Letter 130802.docx , ,a yFk? i ,i,;' MACKENZIE . DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED September 3, 2013 City of Tigard Attention:Agnes Kowacz 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LaCie, LTD Landscape Revisions Project Number 2130079.00 Dear Agnes: According to your request, the landscape plan sheet L2.1 has been updated to show the existing eleven street trees along SE Tech Center Drive and an existing parking lot tree. By showing these eleven existing street trees on the landscape plan we are able to eliminate the three proposed Hedge Maple trees and show that the landscape plans are in code conformance. Sincerely, m Bauer Landscape Designer c: Erica Jankowski, Ryan Schera - Mackenzie H:\Projects\213007900\WP\LTR\LTR-LaCie-Landscape Revisions-130903.docx GROUP MACKENZIE I. PROJECT SUMMARY Owner/Applicant: LaCie, LTD Attention: Melissa Cahill 22985 NW Evergreen Parkway Hillsboro, OR 97124 Tax Map/Lot: Tax Lot 2S 101 DC4500 Site Address: 7555 SW Tech Center Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Site Size: 217,960 SF (5 acres) Zoning: Industrial Park (I-P) Request: Type II Major Modification Review Project Contact: Group Mackenzie 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97214 Phone: (503) 224-9560 Fax: (503) 228-1285 Ryan Schera, Planner (Primary Contact) rschera@grpmack.com Ext. 384 Erica Jankowski, Architect Robin Laughlin, Landscape Architect Brent Nielsen, Civil Engineer 2 H:\Rojecls\213007900\WP\130426-Type II Moj a Modficalion.doc GROUP MACKENZIE II. INTRODUCTION Existing Development The 5-acre project site is located entirely on Tax Lot 4500 of Map 2S-1-01DC in the Industrial Park (1-P) zone. The site is bounded by existing industrial development to the north, east, and south, and undeveloped industrial property and the WES train tracks to the west. The site is currently developed with a tilt-up concrete building with asphalt paved parking and truck circulation aisles on all sides. The western portion of the site is developed as an open gravel pad which is used primarily for outdoor storage. Project Description The property tenant and applicant, LaCie Corporation, is proposing to make modifications to the existing industrial building and site located at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard, Oregon. LaCie is a French computer hardware company specializing in external hard drives, RAID arrays, optical drives, flash drives, and computer monitors. LaCie intends to modify the building and site in order to better accommodate their needs for assembly of hard drives, storage of product/material and shipping/receiving operations. More specifically, the applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the existing building by converting approximately 6,181 SF of existing storage space into office space and converting 8,855 SF of existing storage space into production/assembly space. The total conversion of square footage is summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Building Use and Square Footage Existing Storage(S-1) 46,076 SF First Floor Office(B) 2,700 SF Mezzanine Office(B) 2.594 SF Total: 51,370 SF Proposed Storage(S-1) 31,040 SF Production/Assembly(F-1) 8,855 SF First Floor Office(B) 8,881 SF Mezzanine Office(B) 2,594 SF Total: 51,370 SF In addition, modifications to the exterior of the building are proposed and will consist of: • Converting solid man-doors to glazed man-doors on the east and south elevations. • Converting an existing drive-in overhead door into a new loading dock door on the south elevation. • Converting an overhead door into a storefront window as well as adding a new storefront window on the south elevation. • Adding four new fire doors. One on the north and south elevations and two on the west elevation. • Adding two dock pit levelers on the south elevation. 3 Ft\Projec15\2133079CO\WF\133426-Type 1 Major MOafi«fiooi aoc GROUP_ __ ____ —TrACKENZIE Site modifications will consist of restriping the existing parking area, removal of two landscape islands to accommodate truck loading and unloading and approximately 10,044 SF of new paving in the gravel yard area in order to accommodate additional parking. Additional site improvements consist of new landscape islands, a vegetated stormwater swale and ADA improvements and pedestrian connections to the street in the parking area. The new truck dock area on the south side of the building will consist of a new dock pit and retaining wall. 4 Ft\Projecis\213007900\yVPm30426 Ivl Type A Major odikalion.doc GROUP MACKENZIE III. APPROVAL CRITERIA CHAPTER 18.360 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.050 Major Modification(s)to Approved Plans or Existing Development B. Evaluation criteria. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s)will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; Response: Residential development is not proposed. The criterion does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; Response: Dwelling units are not proposed. The criterion does not apply. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; Response:The existing site was developed as a warehouse/freight movement building with accessory office and 25 parking spaces. The applicant intends to convert the building to Light Industrial (storage,production and distribution)and increase the accessory office space.Therefore,changes are proposed by the applicant that would require additional on-site parking. Since this building was permitted with only 25 parking spaces, it appears the existing number of parking spaces is out of conformance with current parking requirements/ratios.Therefore,additional parking is proposed as part of this application to bring the proposed site into conformance with the zoning code. The applicable provisions for on-site parking as listed in section 18.765.020(B)apply to the proposed site because the applicant is proposing to alter the uses which triggers an increase in the on-site vehicle parking required. This criterion applies. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; Response:No changes to the type of industrial structure as defined by the Uniform Building Code are proposed.The primary use is proposed will remain as storage.This criterion does not apply. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%; Response:No changes to the height of the building are proposed. This criterion does not apply. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Response:No changes to the existing access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected are proposed.This criterion does not apply. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; Response:The existing building is a storage and distribution building with accessory office and 25 parking spaces. Blue Bird Transfer previously operated at the site from 1992 to 2012. It is our understanding Blue Bird Transfer had a significant volume of trips associated with their distribution operations.According to the ITE Manual,Warehouse Uses(ITE Code 150)generate 3.56 average daily trips per 1,000 SF of building area.Therefore,the previous user generated approximately 181 average daily trips. The applicant will also have a warehouse(storage)and distribution component to their operations; though,on a much smaller scale and in conjunction with new assembly and office space. According to the ITE Manual, Light Industrial Uses (ITE Code 110) generate 6.97 average daily trips per 1,000 SF of building area.Therefore,according to the ITE Manual,approximately 355 average daily trips(or an increase of 174 trips)are proposed. 5 H:\Projecl5\213p37900\WP\133426-Type 1 Major Modficalrn.doc GROUP_ --`MACKENZIE . Although the ITE Manual states there will be an increase of 174 average daily vehicle trips,the actual user anticipates a lesser number of average daily vehicle trips based on their operations. LaCie(the applicant) will have two inbound shipments in the weekday mornings to deliver components and materials and one outbound shipment in the weekday evenings to distribute finished/assembled product(6 average daily truck trips). LaCie also anticipates having approximately 100 employees working at the site (200 average daily vehicle trips). Therefore, based on their operations, LaCie anticipates generating 206 average daily trips or an increase of 25 average daily trips over the previous user. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; Response: No increase in floor area is proposed. All modifications to the building will be done within the existing footprint. This criterion does not apply. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; Response: The applicant does not propose any reductions to areas reserved for common or usable open space.This criterion does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening;and/or c. Landscaping provisions. Response:There are no recreational facilities on-site:Two existing parking islands are proposed to be removed;however,multiple new parking islands with landscaping will be installed and disbursed throughout the site. At time of project completion,the total overall landscape area for the site will increase from 25%to 29%,4%greater than the minimum 25%requirement for the I-P zone and in compliance with the landscape provisions. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of Subsections B.1 through 10 above of this section. Response: The applicant is requesting approval at this time; no approval has been made yet. This criterion does not apply. 18.360.060 Minor Modification(s)to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Minor modification defined.Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification. B. Process. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification in accordance with Section 18.360.030.B and as follows: I. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; and 2. A narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in Section 18.360.050.B. C. Approval criteria.A minor modification shall be approved,approved with conditions or denied following the Director's review based on the finding that: 1. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and 6 H:\PrcleC1s\213007900\ PB 130425-Type 1 Mtjor Modficalion,doc W GROUP MACKENZIE 2. The modification is not a major modification. Response: As discussed above in Section 18.360.050 of the narrative, the application meets the criteria for Major Modification;therefore it does not fall under Minor Modification as stated in this Section 18.360.060. 18.390.040 Type II Procedure A. Pre-application conference.A pre-application conference is required for Type II actions.Pre- application conference requirements and procedures are set forth in Section 18.390.080.0. Response: With approval from the Director, the applicant waived the requirement for a pre- application conference.The criterion does not apply. B. Application Requirements. 1. Application forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.39O.O8O.E.1; 2. Submittal information. The application shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040.0. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quanta the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum,the transportation system,including bikeways,the drainage system,the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,public facilities systems,and affected private property users.In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Response:The application includes all submittal requirements and is consistent with City of Tigard code. The applicant has identified the relevant approval criteria and development standards in this code and other applicable law. The applicant has also provided all applicable documentations and plans to support the proposed modifications. By submitting the application for review and paying applicable review fees,the applicant has complied with the review procedures and timelines in this section. C. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision. 1. Prior to making a Type II Administrative Decision, the Director shall provide notice to: a. All owners of record within 500 feet of the subject site; b. Any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; c. Any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or who is otherwise entitled to such notice. 2. The purpose of such notice is to provide nearby property owners and other interested parties with an opportunity to submit written comments concerning the application, 7 Ft\Project\215.07,,OLNWP\130426-Typel MajormocircaGOn.doc GROUP -- ACKENZIE prior to issuance of the Type II Administrative Decision. The goal of this notice is to invite relevant parties of interest to participate early in the decision-making process; 3. Notice of a pending Type II Administrative Decision shall: a. Provide a 14-day period for the submission of written comments prior to issuance of a decision on the permit; b. List by commonly used citation, the approval criteria relevant to the decision; c. State the place,date and time the comments are due,and the person to whom the comments should be addressed; d. Include the name and telephone number of the person who will make the Administrative Decision; e. Identify the specific permits or approvals requested; f. Describe the street address or other easily understandable geographic reference to the subject site; g. Indicate that failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence; h. Indicate that all evidence relied upon by the Director to make this decision shall be contained within the record,and is available for public review. Copies of this evidence can be obtained at a reasonable cost from the Director; i. Indicate that after the comment period closes, the Director shall issue a Type II Administrative Decision. The Director's decision shall be mailed to the applicant and to owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the subject site,and to anyone else who submitted written comments or who is otherwise entitled to notice; j. Contain the following notice: "Notice to mortgagee,lienholder,vendor,or seller: The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser." Response:A mailing list of all owners of record within 500 feet of the subject area was provided by the Director at the City of Tigard.A public notice letter with the required and applicable material as listed in this section 18.390.040 was then sent out to all owners of record within the list provided on April 5,2013. The criterion is met. D. Administrative decision requirements. The Director's Decision shall address all of the relevant approval criteria. Based upon the criteria and the facts contained within the record, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the requested permit or action. Response: The applicant is submitting with this application all relevant approval criteria for the Director's decision requirements. The modifications will comply with all applicable regulations as described in this narrative. 8 HAPrajec15\2130079CO\ \130426-Type 1 Major Modficalion.doc GROUP MACKENZIE IV. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHAPTER 18.530 INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Section 18.530.020 List of Zoning Districts A. I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review,design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian friendly. Response: The applicant is remodeling an existing warehouse for the production/assembly of exterior cases for external hard drives. The applicant is also remodeling office space within the structure to support the accessory business operations.The proposed modifications will comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the City of Tigard code to ensure no off-site impacts. Section 18.530.040 Development Standards Table 2-Development Standards in Industrial Zones I-P(Table 18.530.2) Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size None No Change Minimum Lot Width 50 feet No Change Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 35 feet No Change -Side facing street on corner& through lots[1] 20 feet No Change -Side yard 0/50 feet[3] No Change -Rear yard 0/50 feet[3][4] No Change -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street Maximum Height 45 feet No Change Maximum Site Coverage[2] 75%[5] 59%-No Change Minimum Landscape Requirement 25%[6) 29%(increase of 4%) [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050.8 are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. Response:No changes are proposed for the building footprint or height. The site coverage will be maintained at 59%of the total site and is below the 75%maximum required.The applicant proposes 29%of landscape which is above the minimum landscape requirement of 25%.The criterion is met. 9 F t\Rniec A219oo79oa\wP\13042brype 1 Major Mod&caiion.doc GROUP ---- MACKENZIE , 18.530.050 Additional Development Standards B. Reduction of lot coverage requirements.Lot coverage may be increased from 75%to 80%as part of the site development review process,providing the following requirements are satisfied: 1. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20%of the site. 2. The applicant shall meet the following performance standards with regard to the landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process: a. Street trees,as required by Section 18.745.040.C.1 are to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height; b. The landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; c. All applicable buffering, screening and setback requirements contained in Section 18.745.050 shall be satisfied; d. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area. Response: The site coverage is well below the maximum coverage of 75%. The applicant is proposing to maintain the site coverage at 59%. An increase in site coverage is not requested. This criterion does not apply. CHAPTER 18.705 ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Response: The applicant is proposing modifications to an existing structure as well as additional parking. As described above in Section 18.705.020,the provisions of this section will apply. B. Change or enlargement of use. Should the owner or occupant of a lot or building change or enlarge the use to which the lot or building is put, thereby increasing access and egress requirements, it is unlawful and is a violation of this title to begin or maintain such altered use until the provisions of this chapter have been met if required or until the appropriate approval authority has approved the change. Response:The primary use of the existing building is storage and distribution with accessory office space.The applicant is proposing to remodel the building and maintain the primary use as storage and distribution with accessory assembly and office space. Therefore, increased access and egress requirements should not apply. C. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an access plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter in conjunction with another permit or land use action. Response: Based on Table 18.390.1 Site Development Review is required for Major Modification review and Type II process. D. Conflict with subdivision requirements. The requirements and standards of this chapter shall not apply where they conflict with the subdivision rules and standards of this title. Response:The applicant is not proposing development which would conflict with the subdivision requirements of this title.This criterion does not apply. 10 Ft\PtojeciA2130075n0\WP 130426-Type 1 Mcior Mocificalion.doc GROUP MACKENZIE 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Response: Although the applicant is not proposing any changes to the access and egress of the proposed parcel,the property owner,at time of project completion,will maintain the existing access and egress as stipulated in this title. This criterion will be met. B. Access plan requirements.No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: The applicant is submitting plans showing pedestrian circulation,and access and egress of the proposed site. See Sheet C2.1-Site Plan for further details. This criterion is met. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: I. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use;and 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Response: The structure and parking occupy the entire parcel and does not share access with any other use.This criterion does not apply. D. Public street access.All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Response: No changes to the vehicular access and egress are proposed. The existing access and egress connect to SW Tech Center Drive(Public Street).This criterion is met. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Response: No new curb cuts are proposed.This criterion does not apply. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional,and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Response:A walkway connection is proposed from the building ground floor entrance to the parking area and SW Tech Center Drive.There are no other structures to connect to on the proposed site.This criterion is met. 2. Within all attached housing(except two-family dwellings)and multi family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Response: The applicant is not proposing a residential use. This criterion does not apply. 1 1 ►t\ROjects\213307900 WP\133426rypeIMMajaModficargndoc GROUP —"MACKENZIE 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping,pavement markings,or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Response:The pedestrian walkway distance crossing the drive aisle is proposed to be approximately 34'which is below the 36'maximum distance allowed.The walkway will be 6'in width,exceeding the 4'minimum requirement,and will be clearly marked with white pavement striping.This criterion is met. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc.Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Response: The walkway proposed will be paved with asphalt and physically separated with thick painted white stripes. This criterion is met. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when,in the opinion of the Director, the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions;or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles;or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site.Ifdirect access is permitted by the City, the applicant will be required to mitigate for any safety or neighborhood traffic management(NTM)impacts deemed applicable by the City Engineer. This may include,but will not be limited to,the construction ofa vehicle turnaround on the site to eliminate the need for a vehicle to back out onto the roadway. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single- family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Response: The applicant intends to use the existing access.No changes are proposed.The existing access points are adequate for the proposed use of the building/site and do not pose a hazardous situation.This criterion does not apply. H. Access management. 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO(depending on jurisdiction of facility.) 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a 12 Ft\Projects\213:079C O\WP\I33426-Type I Major MOdfiCabon doc GROUP MACKENZIE collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area,as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of streetfrontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Response:The applicant intends to utilize the existing access points,no changes are proposed.This criterion does not apply. I. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family,duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multifamily residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Tables 18.705.1 and 18.705.2; Response: A residential use is not proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access,egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3; Table 18.705.3 Vehicular Access/Egress Requirements: Commercial and Industrial Uses. Required Minimum Existing Minimum Existing Minimum Proposed Parking Number of Number of Access Access Pavement Pavement Spaces Driveways Driveways Width Width Required 0-99 1 2 30' 34.8'(No 24'curbs East change required access proposed) 33.5', west access 35' (No change proposed) 2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; Response: The applicant is proposing to keep the existing access to the building, which is approximately 94 feet from the primary ground floor entrance.The existing entrance meets the needs of the tenant/user,therefore no new access is proposed. CHAPTER 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING E. Screening:special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; Response:Currently the parking and loading areas are screened from the adjacent properties and the right-of-way by existing trees and shrubbery on all sides of the subject site.Currently the site appears 13 H:\Projec ls\2130079C)d\WP 130426-Type 1 Major Modficgfi«,.doc GROUP --JVIACKENZIE to be in conformance with this criterion,therefore no additional screening is proposed.This criterion is met. (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and Response: Low lying shrubbery as well as vertical shrubbery and trees are proposed to be planted within the vegetated Swale and the new landscape islands distributed within the parking area, 87 parking stalls are proposed with the remodel project.Therefore, 12 trees(87 total spaces/1 tree per 7 spaces)are required.As shown on Sheet L2-1, 12 Red Sunset Maple trees are proposed to be planted in the landscape islands in the parking area. Sheet L2-1 also shows a variety of shrubs and groundcover to be planted on site as well as the plantings designated for the Water Quality Swale. The new vegetation is being planted in addition to the existing shrubbery and trees which already exist on-site.This criterion is met.(See sheet L2-1 for a full list of shrubs and groundcover to be used as well as their location on site.) (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Response:The islands proposed as a minimum are 6 feet in width by 16.5 feet in depth exceeding the minimum dimension of 3 feet. This criterion is met. CHAPTER 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: A Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) has been submitted with this application which meets all applicable City of Tigard code requirements. The criterion is met. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s). 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 500 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: (1) Disabled-accessible spaces, (2) Short-term spaces, (3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces, (4) Long-term spaces. Response:All parking is located on the subject site.Disabled-accessible spaces are located in front of the ground floor main entrance of the building. This criterion is met. H:\ ec e\213:079CO\WP\130426 WO"I Moarcana,.aoc Picj 14 GROUP —721ACKENZIE C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est)use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Response:No joint parking is proposed with this application.This criterion does not apply. D. Parking in mixed-use projects.In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula: 1. Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100%of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2. Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90%of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3. Subsequent use or uses, at 80%of the vehicle parking required for that use(s)in Section 18.765.060; 4. The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in Subsection D.1-3 above. Response:This project proposes to maintain the primary use as light industrial and the secondary use as office.Table 3 below summarizes compliance with this criterion and the minimum and maximum parking ratios for bicycle and vehicle parking.This criterion is met. The existing primary use is light industrial and office.The proposed primary use will remain light industrial and the secondary use is office. Section 18.765.070 in the narrative further explains how the parking is calculated between the two uses.This criterion is met. E. Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments.Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15%of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. Response: No residential uses are proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking.Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long- term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site.At least five percent of total long- term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Response: As shown on Sheet C2.1,5%(or 4 spaces)of the parking spaces has been designated for carpool/vanpool use.This criterion is met. 1 5 Ftvrciedsvimu SOD\wP\133426TypelMoicyModficcrbondoc GRQ111?_ - --MACKENZIE G. Disabled-accessible parking.All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Response: Based on the International Building Code(IBC),the required number of ADA parking spaces required is 4 spaces per 76-100 parking stalls.The applicant proposes 4 ADA spaces meeting the requirement. The spaces are sized as required and will be signed accordingly. See Sheets C2.1 and C8.1 for further details. This criterion is met. H. DEQ indirect source construction permit.All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)to: 1. Acquire an Indirect Source Construction Permit; 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators. (Ord. 09-13; Ord. 02-13) Response: The applicant is proposing 87 parking stalls. This criterion does not apply. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas.All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Response: The parking area maintenance for the proposed project site is the responsibility of the Owner.Appropriate care and maintenance of parking area on-site will meet city standards. This criterion is met. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt,concrete,or pervious paving surface.Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained;and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P,groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of- way will be required. Response: The applicant is not proposing to modify any of the previously constructed access or egress points. The existing access points appear to meet this criterion. C. Loading/unloading driveways.A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. Response:The site is not a school or meeting place.Therefore,a driveway for continuous forward flow is not proposed. This criterion does not apply. 1 6 Ft\Projecls\2130079oo\WP\,3o426Type l Major MOd .d foalionoc GROUP —1TACKENZIE D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. 1. All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1. Response: No drive-in uses are proposed with this application.This criterion does not apply. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Response: No new curb cuts are proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation,the property owner shall install a wall,railing,or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Response: As stated above, a walkway connection is proposed from the building ground floor entrance to the parking area and SW Tech Center Drive.There are no other structures to connect to on the proposed site. The pedestrian walkway distance crossing the drive aisle is proposed to be approximately 34' which is below the 36' maximum distance allowed. The walkway will be 6' in width, exceeding the 4'minimum requirement,and will be paved with asphalt and clearly marked with white pavement striping.This criterion is met. G. Parking lot landscaping.Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. Response:As stated above,low lying shrubbery as well as vertical shrubbery and trees are proposed to be planted within the vegetated swale and the new landscape islands distributed within the parking area.87 parking stalls are proposed with the remodel project.Therefore, 12 trees(87 spaces/7 spaces) are required.As shown on Sheet L2-1, 12trees are proposed to be planted in the vegetated swale and landscape islands in the parking area with this application.These trees are being planted in addition to the existing shrubbery and trees which already exist on-site. This criterion is met. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040.H.3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, concrete,or pervious paving surfaces.Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; Response: The existing parking area is paved with asphalt and will be restriped to accommodate additional spaces. As well,a portion of the gravel area is proposed to be paved with asphalt to also accommodate additional parking. As shown on Sheet C2.1,a new vegetated stormwater swale and new water quality catch basins are proposed throughout the parking area and have been designed to CWS standards in order to ensure these areas are well-drained.This criterion is met. 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; Response:No residential uses are proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The Director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area: (a)within a specified period of time after establishment of the parking area; or(b) if there is a change in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area;or(c)if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, water courses, or properties. Such an agreement shall be 17 Fk\Rnlecls\21330790d\WP\133426dype 1 MalorMOdrCaliondoc GROUP MACKENZIE executed as a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel parking area. Gravel-surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent with the following: a. Gravel parking areas shall not be permitted within 100 feet of any residentially- zoned or residentially-developed area, b. Gravel access and/or parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any water course, c. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any public right-of- way, and d. A driveway which connects a gravel parking area with any public street shall be paved;and Response:The remaining gravel area on the west portion of the site is not intended to be used for parking. This criterion does not apply. 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit is approved. The approval authority shall consider the following in determining whether or not the gravel- surfaced parking is warranted: a. The request for consideration to allow a parking area in conjunction with the temporary use shall be made in writing concurrently with the Temporary Use application per the requirements of Section 18.385.050, b. The applicant shall provide documentation that the type of temporary use requested will not be financially viable if the parking space surface area requirement is imposed, and c. Approval of the gravel-surfaced parking area will not create adverse conditions affecting safe ingress and egress when combined with other uses of the property. Response:No temporary uses are proposed with this application.This criterion does not apply. 1. Parking lot striping. I. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the offstreet parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked;and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction offlow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Response: The existing parking area will be restriped with a 4" white stripe. The proposed new parking area will be paved with asphalt and striped with a 4"white stripe. This criterion is met. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete,asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Response:Protective curbs and wheel stops are provided adjacent to landscaped areas and sidewalks. See Sheet C2.1 for wheel stops locations and see sheet C8.1 for details on curb dimensions. This criterion is met. K Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Response: Drainage will be controlled within the site and will be routed so that adjacent private property,public property and the receiving system are not adversely impacted. Water quality catch basins will be installed at existing catch basin locations and a new vegetated swale will be installed 1 8 H:\projects\21300770U\WP\133426-Type I MyOr Mocifcation.cloc GROUP MACKENZIE adjacent to the parking area along the west portion of the site. See Sheet C8.2 for further details on the proposed water quality catch basins.This criterion is met. L. Lighting.A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Response:No changes to the existing site lighting are proposed. This criterion does not apply. M Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Response: No signage is proposed at this time. This criterion does not apply. N. Space and aisle dimensions. (see Figure 18.765.1) Response: The proposed parking stalls will follow the provisions of the 90° standard stalls. The proposed stall depth is 18.5',stall width is 9',aisle width is 26',and module width is 63'. See Sheet C2.1-Site Plan for further details.This criterion is met. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet ofprimary entrances to structures; 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on afloor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Response: No bicycle spaces currently exist on-site. However, 10 bicycle parking spaces are proposed in order to bring the site into compliance.This criterion is met. B. Covered parking spaces. I. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building,in which case,the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. Response: The bicycle parking spaces will be located approximately 24 feet of the main entrance. Because no parking structures are proposed,the bicycle parking does not need to be covered and is proposed to be uncovered. See Sheet C2.1 and C8.1 for detail on location and construction of the bicycle parking stalls. This criterion is met. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term(employee)parking is encouraged but not required; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 24 feet by six feet long,and,when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet.An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; 19 rr�Pra)ects\213307500\wP 133426-Type 1 Maior Moran.doc � GROUP MACKENZIE 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased.At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Response:Sheet C8.1 shows the design and dimensions of the proposed bicycle parking spaces.The proposed spaces will be securely anchored to the 8'x 16'concrete pad.In addition,as shown on Sheet C8.1,the bicycle spaces have an access aisle of at least 5 feet. This criterion is met. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parkingfacilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material,i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Response: As shown on Sheet C2-1, 10 bicycle spaces are proposed to be located approximately 24 feet from the main entrance.The surface will be a concrete surface. This criterion is met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H.In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces.Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.3 70.020.C.5.e. Table 3-Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements(18.765.070) Maximum Maximum Maximum Minimum Proposed Required Proposed Use Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Bicycle Bicycle Bicycle Zone B Office(11,475 SF) 2.7/1,000 4.1/1,000 27 0.5/1,000 6 6 30 spaces 45 spaces (SECONDARY USE) 27 spaces @ 40 spaces @ 90%per 90%per 18.765.030.D 18.765.030.D Warehouse 0.5/1000 None 15 spaces 0.1/1,000 3 3 (31,040 SF) 15 spaces Light Industrial 1.61/1,000 None 45 spaces 0.1/1,000 1 1 (8,855 SF) 14 spaces (PRIMARY USE) Total 56 spaces 136 spaces 87 10 10 Response: Based on the information provided in Table 3 above. This criterion is met. 20 ►c\RrtlecE\213o079aaVwP\I3o426-Type 1 major nnodecalan.doc GROUP MACKENZIE V. CONCLUSION Based on the information presented and discussed in this narrative and the attached supporting documents and plans, the proposed project meets the established standards and is consistent with the applicable criteria required for Major Modification Review. The project provides additional opportunity for employment and commercial services in the region and is therefore in the public interest, and merits approval. 21 Ft\Prciecls\213307900'\WP\130126Type1 Mcjo dTi mocalion.doc GROUP MACKENZIE VI. EXHIBITS A. Land Use Application Form B. Site Aerial Map C. Drawings D. C W S Documentation E. Stormwater Report F. Neighborhood Meeting Materials 22 H:\Projects\213007903 WP 130426-Type•Major MOdfoahondoa • , ` t 86855612 PORAC He. +as-S►ECM WAERAHTT 0EE0-S7. )!M IC.r►.•eh 6rwlwl• oK TICOR TITLE O R I �' INSURANCE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY FORM \ NA L I: CORPORATZ GRANTOR --MSeattle-First National Bank, a national banking association --• 47 I' liK r% i a iCY3iX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,Grantor, conveys and specially warrants to . Mt. Hood Chemical Corporation, an Ore;on corporation Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances created or suffered by the grantor except as `, specifically set forth herein, situated in.. Washington County, Oregon, to-wit: - Lot 1, TECH CENTER BUSINESS PARK, in the • City of Tigard, County of Washington`State . of Oregon ("The Property"). a'';"CR ,•'-, V.ft.Sl•�,NGTf`N COUNTY e =--1-. REAL PROPERTY TRAPSFER TAX �r{4'.. /337 /v-,,,21T-6 : ';) FEE PAID DATE IIF SPACE INSUFFICIENT. CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) C NEL ) 'e; The said property is free of all encumbrances created or suffered by the Grantor excep C ®, ... exception Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 13 of Ticor Title Report MAR 2 5 2013 • No. 34-132948 The true consideration for this conveyance is$1,336,420.00 (Here comply with the re Done by order of the grantor's board of directors with its corporate seal affixed on-..N1ay.emb.e.r 25. , 1986... - THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DE. SCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND $Qy ttle- Y National Bank USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING f , s.: "THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE ) . C .�y'�� PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR : .lilil{t COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. p,4 j?T' ra- Of 9y/(e/{ (CORPORAT b e^`�.•t•' -' sX - •• s - • • November 86 - of King ___ .. ..)es: ova t .a -- * man James P. FX '�' .Per;ohalf�?:�ploliliAd..::� �.;; .. Q. ...-}1111111E ._...._---._............_ ....�_._.... a • >Imt Real 13 t t O f€ who, train/ iirsEdy,ly„sR�tille,t(ici Gay that the former is the cer ,,, ;.••, Di ':-Segttle-First N t ,QUa]....Baa _..........._.___......_..._____, a corporation, and that the aeall t s F or : ;...,w4140 to 4a foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed ^ / 1...-:: •.., and healed:ht behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of director : and each of them acknowledged 7r.`•":„3, 'r, 4 t :•.i licri tru senate•be its voluntary act and deed. /�-, (Or 1ifti,$yAL r .w�+ Before as _ -1a.�� _'" � :!s-,.....r.:. t . rtt. p••••.:4a .:=c.t\.' Watery Public,! "c-x; My corn-mission _spires:. :20-8WJ.. P %I.•.:,,. ,.ti-;•• �.'� ic,e.,., s„i_�_--..,. ashington I fl- f i Ij CIilt� TiTY DEED It t. �` STATE OF OREGON Seattle-First�` N'ational Bank SS ___._ _ __..._......... ...._. _._._. ...... _._. County of Washington - Mt. Hood Chemical Corp - M�GRANTOR .•._._GRANTEE I,Donald W.Mason,Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex-Officio Recorder of Con- ....----...-.-.-----.----.........----------.......-----.... ....-.4 CR•NTW3 AOORCSS.v. veyances for said county, do hereby certify that After recording ntvm f•: the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said county. • Mt. Hood Chemical .Corporation .PACE RESERV.0 -------~~• Donald W. Mason, Director of 4444 NW Yeon _.. ...._ _.._...__._.. .._ .. . roR Assessment and Taxation, Ex- Portlands...OR 97210__� __ Officio County Clerk -.._ -_. .� - RECORDER•. Ott NANt, sa. ZIP • Unlil a change Is requested,all tax statements Shall be sent to the lelteeving address: .._..M.t.^._l1RQ-d.... hemicaL..Carpnration Portlanc}A DR..9.7214}•r. .___..__. 1986 KOY 28 PM MAMZ. ADORES*. ZIP Is CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT ►� 7 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 191127 - 04/25/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2013-00003 SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-43116 $4,229.00 Total: $4,229.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 093719 AKOWACZ 04/25/2013 $4,229.00 Payor: LaCie Total Payments: $4,229.00 Balance Due: $627.00 Page 1 of 1 ICITY OF TIGAR. RECEIPT 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 191265 - 05/07/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2013-00003 SDR Under$1,000,000-LRP 100-0000-43117 $625.00 SDR2013-00003 SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-43116 $2.00 Total: $627.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Fund Transfer DHOWSE 05/07/2013 $627.00 Payor: Total Payments: $627.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGAR. RECEIPT 1111 j 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGAR1) Receipt Number: 190663 - 03/19/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID MMD2013-00015 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan- 100-0000-43117 $81.00 LRP MMD2013-00015 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan 100-0000-43116 $546.00 Total: $627.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 093517 TLEHRBACH 03/19/2013 $627.00 Payor: LaCie Total Payments: $627.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 1111 CITY OF TIGARD FEE AND PAYMENT HISTORY v ! _ . 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD SDR2013-00003 - 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR A, TIGARD, OR 97223 Revenue Payment Fee Description Account Number Fee Amount Invoiced Paid Date Paid Method Receipt# Due SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-43116 $4.231.00 $4,231.00 $4,229.00 4/25/13 Check 191127 $0.00 $2.00 5/7/13 Fund Transfer 191265 SDR Under$1,000,000 100-0000-43116 $4,231.00 $4,231.00 $4,229.00 4/25/13 Check 191127 $ $2.00 5/7/13 Fund Transfer 191265 SDR Under$1,000,000- LRP 100-0000-43117 $625.00 $625.00 $625.00 5/7/13 Fund Transfer 191265 $0.00 Totals for Fees $9,087.00 $9,087.00 $4,856.00 $4,231.00 Receipt# Payment Method Check# Payor: Receipt Date Receipt Amount 191127 Check 093719 LaCie 04/25/2013 $4,229.00 191265 Fund Transfer 05/07/2013 $627.00 Total Payments: $4,856.00 Balance Due: $0.00 I PRB-APE HIID BY N • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 TIGARD Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 File 4 Other Case# • Date By Receipt# Fcc Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(I or II) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Conditional Use(III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) El Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ®Site Development Review(II) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 7555 SW Tech Center Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 TAX MAPS&TA) LOT NOS. 2S101DC4500 R)TAL SITE.SIZE: ZONING CLASSIFICATION 217,960SF/5 Acres IP- Industrial Park Group Mackenzie MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 1515 SE Water Avenue Portland, OR 97214 PI IONE NO. FAX NO 503.224.9560 rschera @grpmack.com 503.228.1285 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PI iONP NO Ryan Schera ext. 384 1'N()PER i't OWNER/DM)I R)LDER(Attach list of more than mtc) Summit Properties Attn:Yoshio Kurosaki MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/S"T"ATE/7.IP 5550 SW Macadam, Suite 205 Portland, OR 97239 PIIONENO. - IAXNO. 503.227.5663 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) The..pxoperty-tenaat-and.appl -• - - • •• . ••• • ••• •• • • ak- •••• _ •• • •' - a• industrial building and site in order to better accommodate their needs for assembly of hard drives, storage of product/material and shippinglreceiving operations. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE"BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. }iresi ate 4 \ 9/2f l2 I3 Owner's Signature Yoski a K kAros 4\44 Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date l" 2 Si!3 Applica ;g/Re resentative's Signature Date Rya Sclnevfa , Gott p M a c k r. Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date likt , I LaCie Tentant Improvement MCI . , I I ' 7555 SW Tech Center Drive !as 1 Portland, OR 97223 - i ,,,ki\ ..., 1 . 1.:slit4), I ' �. Sim 1 t• < Mil I NO\ s 1 MI i \ IIII i \ \\ I ■ \ WWCherry.D;• ---- Site n. .. 4 i \ N:\ \ \ . \ i,,,, .4 \ • , \ \ , \ • . , , ., , .....;::.„..„, ... , , N \ , . ♦ ...1:: . _ I , _< { +1 ' 0 75 150 3D0 �. . . , ... P. i w. I se « . SCALE I .. .r a �� l . '. :.. •« •• • Source Data 1 ' • +� •u ' Metro RLIS Lite Base Data.February 2013 . .. •.• E• i" Geographic Projection Information I ` ' + • • „ NAD 83 HARN,Oregon North % MN s - a . Lambert Conformal Conic I ` Location Map I ♦ �' iii r i ` Clerk ♦ + s.-:, I ` �� - t Multnomah \\e.hinl;run ` Ez. _ mn 6' jy• ,Y, . I"f{ —1 f L Clackamas # ; 6 3 k:`+ t 1 1 lam•ill e. i • Marion `� \ G R QS!_P .� § *'. ; ' MACKENZIE "• `'' PORTLAND,OR I SEATTLE,WA I VANCOUVER,WA ` Ir✓ RiverEast Center 11515 Water Avenue.Suite 100 1 Portland.OR 97214 I v �.� PO.Box 14310 I Portland,OR 97293 ` T.503.224.9560 I F.503.228.1285 1 wwwgroupmackenzie.com . S .i um I I GROUP MACKENZIE 2006• ` v • •'«c• © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I ;, .. '� . r r Day 03115113 I Map Created by'.DRO A Fie Laetl Tgard Aenal.mxd Prom.NO 21300]900 I G . _I._. Y.Q,G l-4-V__` iI/� n 1O104L1E YEgMC• •4•E1AaE.� 0 o m ce :-ri: ��HH// YYIE tW O 0 o �ll� tBA 0 07YP. coa 3 m 0 0- 0 Y I Y 30 0 15 30 60 20 j 0 n �, 1O, I 0� O O VJ N V (IX FELT) c G ■ 27' .-_,94 �. 1 inch■ 30 ft <- MOUNTABLE n k 0 / ; ... .. r'`.'ir::: CURB k___ -_ 128• ILLS' 0 v O KEYNOTES ;m i •I - � `BAT '••. BAY DB- ` - 1. REINSTALL MAILBOX ON NEW 4"x4"PT WOOD SUPPORT, VERIFY 4'CLEARANCE, MIN. s to 2I TD ��-I'/ e, , 'R 2. PAINTED PARKING STALL STRIPE, 4'WHITE o m o I •::.:• - 1 ` / I C ABLE/ : [+ ©��////// �� 4 _• 3. 6'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL 6/C8.1 F c' �1 co !'to I - I� Z �/M • € 4. ADA ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP, SEE DETAIL 11/C8.1 0 2 a P 1 �i o c I � f��1 % •4 5. ADA COMPLIANT PARKING STALL INSTALL VAN-ACCESSIBLE c- °ER,I 0 15'n I ,+�7F 4O - I SIGNING WHERE NOTED BY'VAN- ON PLAN,SEE DETAIL 8/CB.1 :w°a R:o I / , 6. INSTALL PRECAST CURB STOP 3•FROM FACE OF CURB WALL, TYP. SEE DETAIL 3/C8.1 0 m c o IIIII g 1.1 ii v.F•• EXISTING GRAVEL �{� 7 7. FACE PAVEMENT MIN. FROM EDGE OF R SEE NT OR 3'MIN. FROM U m f J a FACE OF NEW CURB, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. SEE DETAIL 5/C8.1 i °O LOT !I a/ © 8. 2' CURB BREAK WITH 3'1' CONCRETE SPLASH PAD, SEE DETAIL 3/C8.1 IT '•tf : 1 o - r• 9. INSTALL(2)BOLLARDS BEHIND NEW CURB TO PROTECT Client �._�.' ,PPP 1 O a&"^ EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING F RE HYDRANT TO REMAIN. SEE DETAIL 15/C8.1 : ;�:;::: 1 n� I :��� ":::.::,:(,;::::: • v Ii`o 10. INSTALL WATER QUALITY CATCH BASIN AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN :::.,:;::;. I v I $ 48,812± SF g LOCATION 25 Mir 7:.; :, I {{ / 11. PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. ' mull! I I 12.TRUCK DOCK RETAINING WALL. SEE ARCH PLANS I 13.PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK STRIPING,PAINTED 1• WHITE, 1 ® 1::.:.:.. .I /•© CMG MIN. SPACING 6 FT.IEWMG - .. I1 3,k% g -� WALL 14.5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL 6/C8.1 Ye �� � /fir I '� �1 © �% Yl11 OOBR I -vExTCU.f 15. 1,tp8 SF VEGETATED WATER DUALITY SOURCE :.:':::.,': , �/ 16. PROTECT EXISTING EXTRUDED CURB TO REMAIN :•':.." , ..,...,:�I ® •� 17. CONCRETE STAIRS WITH HANDRAIL SEE DETAIL 14/C8.1 imiiiD 0 0 © 18.CONSTRUCT NEW AC PAVING,REMOVE CURB AND LANDSCAPING AS NEEDED ii, i ..•' +�i / Y/M DOOR _ 19. PROTECT EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN• 1 ri• t- // /Ltc� ••• / 20.INSTALL NEW TERMINAL FENCE POST AT END OF NEW CURB, MATCH EX. FENCE. _ O I �" Rl"�'47 • f �r *7A ,�„ I REMOVE EXISTING FENCE NORTH OF POST, INCLUDING GATE. 'V TIP. .....h f•�f.�.•:-..����riL:'f.f:.•��'./�.�������la'�...Li da r A 1 I 21. 4•CONCRETE SIDEWALK LANDING AT EXIT DOOR. Project • ' w 22.PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS TO REMAIN P.Ae � • A •- /\� % - ' �II�� ""ab7 R��.� I� 23.SIDEWALK RAMP IN PARKING ISLAND,SFE DETAIL 13/CB.1 f� /,/ !ii34,s 24.REMOVE EXISTING SIGN lemma sr „0 1 •^ � 25.REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL SURFACING, THEN EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL 36.23• ' 0:: ;: ::�/.. � ��►•rim WITH TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE ISLAND AREA. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR IOW:' :f: '✓"uuZ PLANTING DETAILS AND TOPSOIL DEPTH REQUIREMENTS. 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR • �.,• ;;di b:+�/LRW TKiARD,OR • SEE DETAIL 2 C2.1 FOR - 26.BIKE RACKS MOUNTED ON CONCRETE PAD, 5 RACKS PROVIDING 10 SPACES. SEE DETAIL 9/C8.1 ENLARGED EN�RY PLAN ■ my 17 , /) /i 23.4• �' 0 -� I ID \ 1 • 9 , R-10. • LEGEND R�10' I 11 (�, �'�� --r• ® FXIGTINC PROPOSED C5-.1 .:. CONCRETE CURB PER 1/C8.1 OMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB PER 2/C8.1 \\,/x------- - - - ©� - O _ _ _ FENCE . - ... EDGE OF GRAVEL -- - - - - --- ' © CPOUP YAIXFNZE 201] ALL RIGHtS PEAPI'ED UCHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING THESE°PARINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF SW TECH CENTER DR MATCH Ex. SEE DETAIL 7/C8.1 GROUP MAIXENZIE ANO ARE NOT TO BE CURB j1 USED OR REPRODDCED IN ANY MANNER, STE PLAN I� HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING WITHOUT MICR RRITTEN PERMISSION ® r LAN SEE DETAIL 7/C8.1 REVISIONS: SCALE: I•-30' •CONCRETE PAVING OR SIDEWALK A DSi,�A{I RENS/06 RES'190N DELTA Lam•_. .., ..,• • • • •'.♦• w'E SHEET a051NG DATE GENERAL NOTES ICY ///// CATCH BASIN ® . 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE _ , , • ,__- _ MAN DOOR I REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TICARD,CLEAN WATER SERVICES RDS) LUMINAIRE p AND THE CURRENT AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS•FOR PUBLIC ADS / WORKS CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW SITE COVERAGE DATA EVERY OFFSET, BEND OR ELBOW REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE I__ I PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY DIMENSION. COMPONENT PIECE,SECTION, ' �j JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ALL LOCATIONS FOR POSTING CONDITION FINAL CONDITION To- III/ ��, WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE PAVED AREA: 67,996 SF (1.56 AC) 71,103 SF (1.63 AC) 11 y� FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES - - 7 �� LAYING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS TO SIDEWALK AREA 832 SF (0.02 AC) 1,780 SF (0.04 AC) SHEET TITLE: • In I CONDITION. SIZE AND LOCATION BY UNCOVERING, PROVIDING SUCH IS PERMITTED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION, BEFORE BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 48,812 SF (1.12 AC) 48,812 SF (1.12 AC) `���N +�4� TYP. BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE 16• w "1q ANY DISCREPANCIES. IMPERVIOUS AREA. 117,640 SF (2.70 AC) 121,695 SF (2.69 AC) 0 c �E I��� 3 CONTROL DEVICES EROSION PREVENTION BE TINSTALLED SEDIMENT IS MEET REQUIRED.CITY OF EROSION AND GRAVEL AREA 38,517 SF (O.BB AC) 32,806 SF(0.75 AC.) 5 RISERS 1 CWS REQUIREMENTS. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE •le ( 1..1 .r- -1, e O ; ®� - AC ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WgRK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL LANDSCAPE AREA: 61,803 SF (1.40 AC) 63,459 SF (1.46 AC) • - 5'.3• TOTAL SITE AREA: 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) ® I 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REWIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED • r• MOW' • / WITHIN THE WORK SITE AND SHALL BE ROUTED SO THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE �1• A .n IEffili� c;:;{{�:; :r:;;�: •'--••-- _ �■ PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY --, +_I�:}; ���®' - oS IMPACTED. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE AWN Y:MH •• }}'���.{:'I}}•••. :,:{.1:}.1.3} •y;�, ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. DR B '©••19 • :. : I' , •.1 - 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION PARKING SUMMARY CHECKED BY MWB - • ► IMPROVEMENTS TO NEW FINISH GRADES. �. Y _ ©'4n SHEET: �,•'.•' �. ' .:.#.1t1, ac I 6. EXCAVATION: EXCAVATE FOR SLABS,PAVING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO FXISTING PROPOSED .•�,.O _- ' . •�, SIZES AND LEVELS SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND PARKING STALLS: 24 74 I a 3'• .:., FOR PROPER COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BACKFIWNG MATERIAL 7®. • • •' • • • •' - EXCAVATORS MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; �� EXCAVATORS SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS HANDICAP STALLS: 1 4 � l-' •' •' .I•' - '.,•I® • SEVENTY-T (72 HOURS MINIMUM PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO `j 2.1 - ........7 . ...-_.,��. ./�`" . �� UTILITIES SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. (ONE CALL EXISTING PARKING STALLS TO REMAIN: 8 �s I ,� O LOCATE 696-4 NOTIFICATION ALL OTHER CENTER-two-332-METRO AREA 246-6699, ®' •' �� •' (• ' 'I�/� OREGON 696-4848, ALL OTHER AREAS 1-800-332-2344). TOTAL 25 87 7. WHERE CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING PIPE. AND PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS, BIKE PARKING: 0 10 PIPE THE CONTRACTOR SNALL EXPOSE THE END OF THE EXISTING PIPE VERIFY THE ■ LOCATION.SIZE, AND ELEVATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. JOB NO. 213007900 O ENLARGED PLAN - FRONT ENTRY 8. REQUEST BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE �K7VV ♦Jt/ • SCALE: 1• - 10' APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL-4/26/13 1. 1.... \ - - DING NOTES 588'30'24"E 321.15' - - - !...a�� __- - r�'�` G tE AETAl 4G MIN f ! i CURBS, OR THE OBVIOUS ISE INDIC TED. FI NI HSTRUCTURAR GRADE TOHE NIFORMALEVELS COR SLOPES ALKS, '5 m - A I IY�f[7' wee R ON it)p BETWEEN POINTS%MERE GRADES ARE GIVEN. ROUND OFF SURFACES. AVOID ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVELS. 0«DO go o j yo 0 • I ,�� ��. ROUGH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLABS, WALKS. AND THEIR BASE COURSES. GRADE FOR �. F. ' PAVE DRIVES AND PAVED PARKING AREAS AS INDICATED AND SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND PROVIDE FOR • 1 iYATT1 � �- ,� _ SURFACE DRAINAGE AS SHOWN, ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SURFACING MATERIALFI'�., o o c I ,iY'..0 I a• - �.�,�■.► I AT COMPLETION OF JOB AND AFTER BACKFIUJNG BY OTHER CRAFTS HAS BEEN COMF•[�1AND < iYFAi'i COMPACT AREAS WHICH HAVE SETTLED OR ERODED TO BRING TO FINAL GRADES.GRADING TOLERANCES: I ►i.l�L7 I ROUGH GRADE AT PAVED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS: 10.1 FT. <e• .� I I f►f IF,7 :44617 MA a •• ` FINISH GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL SURFACING: 30.03 FT. ;N. Ji•X1•T6 AC MA `. EX • m - I I �' ' EX Yi,A,- Y ASPHALT 2. •FXCCAVA��ry EXCAVATE FOR SLABS, PAVING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS > yA Of pl, i►411-".7 AC SHOWN OR REQUIRE. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION !F REQUIRED BACKFILLING o a I STARS Z TCH MATERIAL XCAVATOR(S MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; 0 o u 0 • I I 1 • IiAi T7 (16T3T EXCAVATOR S)SHALL NOTIFY AU.UTIUTY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS o c s m 0 I MO.:,I -- 6AY,,,. NAy,,, _ itA9.:� • 72 HOURS MINIMUM)PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO fF c I .1`I 1iL_� `: ..M TCH > A UTIUTIES ALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 0•0 1 I ��ps..II �' 'YYyyI1 �' 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS REQUIRE. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST o c -t I 1 WYE:::[ iYi•4.._y �/ // // / / BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING THE CITY OF TIGARD AND CWS REQUIREMENTS. THE GOVERNING c o c Iy I y ,M '.•. I� JURISDICTION MAY, Al ANY TINE, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLSH o c c< 0 ! 1 IYi6-I.1 S EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL •c W«o p 100 -_ WO,,BS 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE a m`8 a o w • ' GRAVEL LO I /'- MATCH EX. AC - AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND THE RECEIVING W a Al c AN I - >, • IS W'iE • I SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TINE, ORDER - • • •N• ta I • POST I CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL. a `Id m $0 MD .I cw UO1I .1 an 1 g 5. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND USED FOR LANDSCAPING. RTL•U.Ir RI j jI! { .7 11-33 6. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASED ON A SURVEY BY Client NORTHWEST SURVEYING, INC.. AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL b I 4 I • o EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH HIS OWN RESOURCES PRIOR TO START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. • I I 1[i•A'•J AC •= ° 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE GRADES Al ENTRANCE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. : IAI° I EXISTING BUILDING i 3 8. 2%MAXIMUM SLOPE AT ALL ADA-COMPLIANT PARKING SPACES AND LOADING ZONES. 1 1 �� 1 FF�171.� 2 9. 5%MAX SLOPE(EXCLUDING RAMPS)AT PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PUBLIC R.O.W. AND WI • I II.T1.l T••• ;n BUILDING ENTRANCES. • ITI:II•T•I B I M6 I . - ' 10.WHERE SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUTE MATTING. SLOPE SHALL BE 'L '.i iYLA'I ■ 1 -ES PREPARED TO ENSURE COMPLETE AND DIRECT CONTACT OF MATTING WITH SOIL FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S I iTL�r1 AC I RECOMMENDATIONS. • Yer, I ASPIMLT _ I •• ifiAi•7B p[rA 1 WALL I ,.,•r,,1 8_�. V 1ILII 1 NOTES • YAN DOtlI 4 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, CLEAN WATER SERVICES, ERfCAL I' I 6�.11 1YGA•11 AC GATE p� AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING I MN.I� 1 SEE DETAIL 2/C2.2 FOR COOS. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC R.O.W. REQUIRES A PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT. ( / ATCH ES. ENLARGED GRADING PLAN I I TIC.:. •fY[•IF:7 / TC •�� 2. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET, BEND I �f / 'iT �E7 AC ILINIII AC OR ELBOW REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY•1 I MET. AC • E%; A H ED%. �F fC3AITl BOTTOM WALL , DIMENSION, COMPONENT PIECE, SECTION, JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. ff)157 T•' ®!'.1 AC / s/ fYL•x7.1 • ALL LOCATIONS FOR WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN :A;I7B / i a 1OK 9041 , ASPHALT THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING SHALL BEU VERIFIED EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONDITION UTIUTIES LAYING WITHIN ' ,�1 iFi:•F Project ,�'Al•G Fes/ •,1•.; .,_ ,'.�I���Y^" � ,IA UNCOVERING ROVIDING EXCAVATION IIS PERMITTEDFlBYY LOCALL PUBLIC AAU HORITIES WITH A,MIRISDIICTION, ��TENANT \ A 8.OVERFLOW RISER 1I� fir` L'" 41'..: ► �.�/_ �� ■' I BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE ANY RIM ELEV.-169.25 c w,J•.�alme ii���I ,'` _ �i/ � I DISCREPANCIES. IMPROVEMENT � '. /.YAM v. i 1.90.'-- � � r p,7 i.- Bait ^� I 3. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN THE CURRENT UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CHAPTER 7, SECTIONS 8'STORM LATIRAL.CONNECT if_1.7,.7 _� ��0 �IinrA>,. r _ 707 AND 719, AND CHAPTER 11,SECTION 1101.12. ��. TO EXISTING 8 STUB / _- -�� I I NOTE: NOT ALL REQUIRE CLEANOUT$ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 165.03 VERFv) ' ��/ �` �+,. � � 4. PIPING IS SIZED FOR A MANNING'S'N' VALUE- 0.013. ALL STORM PIPING IS 7555 8W TECH 1'�DR ALL STORM PIPIN _ / -�.5T ----. eQg r ��p,A I DESIGNED USING CONCENTRIC PIPE TO PIPE AND WYE FITTINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TKO,OR It 1 �/` , ' F �I: 5. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR UTIUTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING AND TO 5'OUTSIDE THE if.iA.a I�y-'� - -- Y ® � BUILDING a �' ' ' 11YA'1 TC i(:$Z•Tl EX. W 4 1 `,� 6. ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS TO BE 6' AT 2.0%MIN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. \'''A F cant-.'^r_..n I i�lJ�EX ����I►A•c i QThT7 EX. AC I:::E. e:P. • - I f 7. VERIFY LOCATION, D AND DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITIES BY POTHOLING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ifY4.c7 AC 11411141 A I ` NOTIFY ENGINEER OF F DISCREPANCIES. , i `•a_ C ' .= ASNoLT 9(W• EX REMOVE a " . -, -- BASIN, !I,` 1N,. ��� I �- C82 I 1 1 8. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASE ON A SURVEY �y. SEE DET PREPARED BY NORTHWEST SURVEYING, INC., DATED 2/12/2013. 2j..� 4, 63.11 ) f[•f'1«i AC g., �, 4,16,....._.I '' (yam M TCH EX.: 9. EXISTING ON-SITE UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PREPARE 4 a BY VAN DOMELEN/LOOIJENGA AND ASSOCIATES DATE 4/27/1982. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION >>\\ 1: �`� a-�� ,I OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. `),\ ST 1� - - A I - 10. SEE BUILDING PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR PIPING WITHIN THE BUILDING AND UP TO 5'OUTSIDE THE \ G - 66(163067 0 -''t. �1 --- BUILDING. INCLUDING ANY FOUNDATION DRAINAGE PIPING. _���` _: N86'19'37"W }TM 11. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FT OF COVER OVER ALL WATER LINE. - GROUP MACKENZY:2013 0.1 - $89 03'00'W ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / •. > INSTALL EX: FILTER �)>S . THEY GRAwNNGS ARE THE E PROPERTY T TO E INSTALL NEW FILTER T�1 I' 777.1 rr'9�: � r CROUP MAGXENZIE AND ARE NOT TO e[ L=98.89 SEE DETAIL I/FI12 ST 0 L-tt42' USED DR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. RIM-161.33 ST ST WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION R=125.00' -� --., ----1E-9uTa.T5B.3# (ARIFT) R=141.55'MATCM EL I 'CONNECT TO PIPE---•--- _ _ t - REVISIONS: PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN, SW TECH N tu<TAll (21®OLLARDS_BEHIND CURB. CE CENTER DRI E / Tit)/ / GLOOM DATE 111 e GRADING AND UT LJTY PLAN ST 5T =,`� 'I I ' . SCALE: 1' 30' I {__.t + 0 3o 60 ( i TFR 1►.R:Y1 NDING I I �� I \ z-v IFkIpn s - / ( w rE6T 1 iY78S _ _ 1 cn- 3o tt. MATCH EA. 5 E0. 1160(•77 AC LEGEND LLr101EI AC LANDING IC ZiI "P`tlarjlfl♦ S 111[[7 TITLE: ElSlSIId�A PROPnsFn -fora ` GRADING P AID Ilrill, 4 __ A 6�� unmr Pu N CONCRETE CURB _ MATCH EX. iEIAMI 1-- - Q11En A7 AC � I' MO• iL=.3441 YATCII MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB -- \I _ fT:I:A:F7 s7�i ®� Li1C 1• FENCE 1!_►P---� ����®. �(:i'∎[•_'i��ti{U�.1-1 : EDGE OF GRAVEL ---------- - , • If'NCI • LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING iI'_wLl I A U'.;i•1 � � n DRAWN BY:MH 1?7F�1����•kTKb7 '■. o�•• _� CHECKED BY: IAMB HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT /////// /// • VT••--^ H'w•7� PAVING �! I 1 !- 'r s, 011. ■I�-P,l a r�• "•••• iFilfxa SHEET: VLYK-'7 - i 'F7 1.ip:7 i['r•=4 [.-CFI RTA:S7 " A �� `l, L y" f�`�. 'I r Ex. CONCRETE PAVING I - ' a I ' •���/ {•', C2.2 CATCH IN BASIN . ` I • 1 O GRADING ENLARGEMENT - ENTRY SIDEWALK LUMINAIRE 301 SCALE: 1' ■ 10' JOB NO. �11�/�/�-�•�01 GK7W/9.W MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 I. fA1US -1^RADIUS 6^UN.SS OTH - • c t p _ _ NOTED ON PLANS p " ". " " • PAVING SECTION REMAIN • O'E A e 6111�I-I1—III SAW CUT EXISTING A,C. S'D o 76 0 11-II•II0 q m �/////i NOTE: NEW PAVING PAVING AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 1...;C D N LiI`I I + EXISTING AC TO REMAIN o r CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 - PSI AT 28 DAYS C•SACK m II x {:}�`;; MIX, SLUMP: 1 1/2 TO 3- / `=J 1' SEE PLANS _ 1' "f`` EXISTING ROCK BASE i • •,` CONCRETE CURB ///////�/�� AND SUBGRADE-DO NOT • TAPER CURB / PROPOSED �iI/ /�i�1ic;_�riiC� DISTURB SLOPE PER s m 11 1 I • • I` ROCK BASE COURSE 2 ROCK BASE o o '' I�I1 •l..1I —I GRADING UN_ eo I 1 •'_• •11. SEE PAVING SECTION OpoOp'oc :11=R=v —I L— 8 LEVEL 2 CRUSHED(1 LIFT) r`— CAST IN PLA °-' '1 1-rr� 'a I PROPOSED �io�Dol p°oOp°O ' �4.} 8 OF�(-0- CRUSHED °°n CONCRETE - o II 71 ROCK BASE.COMPACT TO 95% f- v; PAVING SECTION. SEE PLAN SUBGRADE '[�°oO°poOp° OR TNEWESECTION (WHICHEVER IS 11-11-11 11-11-11 11.-11 MA%. DENSITY(D15S7) o c c,oa..IL-�I-II=II GREATER) SUBGRADE ° > I _1 1 I 1 1-�11= I_I LIGHT DUTY AC PAVEMENT a a Z ETic s e CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB ®CONCRETE CURB BREAK ®SAWCUT DETAIL m"' ` 0 0. N.T.S. SLOPE PER 01 o N ui •. N.T.S. •,_ N.T.S. GRADING PLAN__ a to o- v YN 4' LEVEL 2 WMAC(2 LIFTS) - c ry AC PAVING SECTION I R"A" • .;;;;,.!.-!,-;...:f�"j,:..;;;"%• •--(10") j("-0 CRUSHED ROCK BASE •E,�„m W 'd O PER PUNS AND `R 1` A N.iv a. : •._' . .. -., ( ) GEOTECH .�Kl/�� BROOM FINISH •71=11=11=11=1f-11- 11, SUOBGRADE TO 95S OF MAX. DENSITY D1557 l7 U c0 F J a n -2L-7-0-5.-51a1.— ' -TOOLED EDGE EACH SIDE Client e• y : ? -:_ / �• '\� III-II �s_;-s .��,:_�5•• L II-' HEAVY DUTY AC PAVEMENT Ir WHEEL BLOCKS. 1117411.=411W.IAIN SEE DETAIL— l• —I=11=1-, 11_■111 1_ —7 W BASE SECTION ASPHALT A - - I. PER PUNS AND \t COMPACT 9JWGRAOE AND AGGREGATE 4-CONCRETE 3,000 PSI(MIN)3g,-SLUMP GEOTECH TO 9SS OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (MA% CONTROL.PINTS AT 3-1/C°1{117 AND NOTE. REBAR, 18-LONG u' ' (3• ) EXPANSION,PINTS AT 20'- .CONCRETE TO HAVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI IN 28 DAYS, 2^ TO 4^ SLUMP, --(2)PER WHEEL BLOCK. r�� 2•G 0EP[11 OF AS SHOO ON PLANS •CONTROL JOINTS AT 2'-0.0/C AND EXPANSION JOINTS AT 2V-0 0/C AGGREGATE 5--0 Yoe ®MOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER e PRECAST CURB STOP e CONCRETE SIDEWALK ®AC PAVEMENT SECTIONS . I 3, 3/6• ADA COMPLIANT SIGNAGE PER STATE REQUIREMENT 1y� S;ALV SEE DETAIL 11/C6.1 TOP OF CURB TO 063•ALUMINUM PLATE .. ® / P'OSTS ALL 6' TYP. 5' M N SIDEWALK ELEVVATICN BLUE BACKGROUND 1 RCN ��\IS R-1O} MITE LLTILHS AND BORDER. BAKED ENAMEL(OR-20-68) 0.1.1010^ • I_ t__ 28 P RONDEDIAMOND 4CCRETE PAD �4.' V INNN��:�►�� Laps TENANT �e �• .41D� `ti,-- sEE DETAU B/cr, —..��,aaaa�i�i,-•--. ILPROVE�6(f VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN((CRT-8Q) VAN / INHERE CALLED OUT 017 PLANS) ACCESSIBLE mom:— I = r PROVIDE TACTILE t1/4" TAPERED CURB WARNING PER ADA. �� SEE DETAIL 12/C8.1 0 CONCRETE TO BE 7666 alAl TECH CENTER DR CONCRETE FOOTING ' FLUSH WITH AC /10ARD OR GALVANIZED STEEL POST - ADA COMPLIANT I >^ ...ti Lb�O�� • DETAILL10 E AT S2'R1TO OC TYP.L jii yySL - (/�) " DETAIL 10/CB.1 36'TYP. FINISH GRADE I 1-! • NOMINAL N V , .4111 NUMBER OF POSTS 1• ,i A A A AS SHOWN ON PLANS DIAMOND PATTERN WARNING SURFACE NOBS 4.6 ADA COAPUANT STRIPING AND CONCRETE"tan i, `+ u u W CURRENT JURISDICTIONS IONS ADA AND FDOTRVG -� - 1•. 1.PUCE DIAMOND PATTERN WARNING SURFACE ON THE ENTIRE CURB RAMP INCLUDING REQUIREMENTS. RAMP THROAT,LANDING, AND WINGS. PATTERNED SURFACING TO BE INTEGRAL COLORED G . 11111111EMIIIMINEMIlliallEill CONCRETE, DARK GRAY TO CONTRAST WITH STANDARD CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 2.ADA COMPLIANT SIGN TO BE MOUNTED 16 2.DIAMOND RAMP TEXTURING IS TO BE DONE WITH AN EXPANDED METAL GRATE PAINT STRIPE / CENTERED IN DISABLED SPACES. PLACED AND REMOVED FROM WET CONCRETE TO LEAVE A DIAMOND PATTERN AS - _ - 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LATEST DERO BIKE RACK, MODEL HEAVY DUTY HOOP RACK, OR APPROVED EQUAL SHOWN. THE LONG AXIS OF THE 01 D PATTERN SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR 9'(TYPICAL) POWDERCOAT BLACK FINISH, IN-GROUND MOUNT OPTION. WWW.DERO.COM TO THE CURB. GROOVES SHALL BE XI DEEP AND )II^WIDE. ANY REQUIREMENTS M ONT AND REVISE BBI :. ANY COMPONENT TO CONFORM ppUp uAaFN2E 20] TO CURRENT STANDARD. © ALL RIp1T5 RESERVED ADA COMPLIANT VAN PARKING SIGN BIKE RACK PLAN/ELEVATION a ADA COMPUANT WARNING SURFACE ADA COMPUANT PARKING STALL HOP°NA 2 H °O"OOE USED e N.T.S. a N.T.S. 1K0 t PRIM NRFT7EMH PEAU1590N 6- 7 Mir �` ^ REVISIONS: CLOSING DELTA Rjaa cLOSO,c DATE 1 : ' STRIPE TYPICAL —4" CONCRETE LANDING IN CONCRETE PAVING 3' MX PAINT 1'-0• 12'TREADS,SEF PUN 1/8- TOOLED RADIUS ; . ri EDGES� 1/YR � - e 10- NOTES: ANTI SKID NOSING 1. SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR®ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SYMBOL LOCATION OF EXPANSION SHEET TITLE: r: 1 1/�•PIPE RAIL � �•-. -: P; , JOINTS. DETAL.9'EET N.T.S. 6- STANDARD STEEL PIPE 2. NO SHINERS ON TOOLED■ NOSE BARS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED AGGREGATE PER 1'71'. Hi �'�/ FILL W/CONCRETE ROUND al CQ ALK DETAIL JOINTS.a TOP T66 SHED WATER �O- OL ���PROVIDE TACTILE ,a z'.; W ROUND TOP OF FOOTING TO •• WARNING PER A.D.A. ��� A N.T.S. cwma_,MO SEE DETAIL 10/C8.1 '' SHED WATER °;av,, 3 O-RECESSED SEALANT <",-�:t.. TOOLED CONCAVE AND TIGHT TO i INSTALL EXPANSION CONCRETE SUB OR PAVING I BACKER ROD. DRAWN BY:MH :54713 1i�i1i�1 4'",01iKNNO! �•'ra yo'; JOINT AT FACE OF SECTION SEE PLAN �1/1v111111•�1111111111111i `s':. ( BOttOM RISER 1 ROUNDED POLYMER BACKER RDO • 1 411.44.1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1• WITH NO BOND TO SEALANT. CHECKED BY: MWB ♦111111♦♦ !11111'4:44.44444444.4:444:6441V •r� • �I� ,414.111.444.11 �1�1� 1�111j r d r q n 1'-0-DIAMETER CONCRETE WI! :804. 1110411111111/1 °' _ FOOTING - 3/8^ PRE-MOLDED JOINT FILLER 111111111111111 ,111111. A \. ,. SHEET: 111111111♦ N INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS AT 20' ■ �1�1�1�1�1�d�11� 'E,V� \. NOTES: ∎�∎ �Af4 b, 6- ,.-0• \`--4" CONCRETE WALK C8.1 R°'°, �1•St� ir 4F04.Yi1 : INTERVAL OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN. CURB 4 AGGREGATE PER ..#1.14-4,14114;,02M0......4014-1,9:0,....z,"� 1e .; ----------COMPACTED FILL U., SIDEWALK DETAIL ••• M-. ••41a��• .- • �.I-• i 2. INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS TO �.I, ♦. -.-Mir.• -•4*- C TO crews 6/C8.1 PENETRATIONS VERTICAL CONCRETE PAVING. ` OB BADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMP a CONCRETE STAIR 6' A....4 SPIPE BOLLARD e N EXPANSION JOINT wyd� _ „ J NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 \' C GENERAL NOTES o (• , az.RNG •)51000ILTER et CONTEOI STORNWATER SOWN01Ek PDIRIAW.OR 0007 54e44G, RO.t,At 077) c C 3 ca as ou'izr BIND 2)WENS TTO eC SIPr1 AGTVARM ANO SQfQEANING. m a n (SEE IIoi 415) PDDL 3)STin STRUCTURE RE'0 et MANUPACTI.RED OF I/4 NQt Sin PLATE. o o ENAT OM O CO �I O 6' a)57OItA/iT9t ITCtl1Rttl 23 FEET OF DRO/FROM RIM TO CURET.INLET SCUD NOT DC LI)1VEL TITAN OUTLET.aura' 0 OI N OVERLAP I 5.H' AFEULAELD AND INTENT TNG TO eE SPEOPIt9 BY O+GIFmt AFir PROVID®Er CNNTMCTnR. W19R WALL . ' ' • A-i'•' ,�, 5)Ore EOU'PPO Cal 4 INCL.(APPROSIMATF)iONG STUBS POR mirror ArTUCAeIE)ma aunt,PIPING STANDARD OU71Lr ' O 4 O . STUB IS D males IN DIAMETER MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB 0 15 NOBS Al OWR,ER CONTKTION TO COLLECTOR PING ti. '':t • -•1 VAR/03 • CAN et MADE uSNG 0e4B1E COUPLING BY Can RK:I OR 1,2 J R T-3 Stl'MAX. 2'3 5dD' G)ee PRW�LOAD BY CONTRACTOR RATING.CN COLLAR U IQOUIR[D.CONCRETE COLLAR*or OUANTPI'(2)H RINPCRCNG G1M5 TO < r` •.•'�••• 7)ALL S'OR/�TEIt!REQUIRE REGULAR AMINRNAICE.Re'EI[TO OPERATION AND MV1T[NANC[GUIDELINES IT)R MORE• L\:``1 0 L I-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN DATA I o 42 JrPx r 0 STORMFILTER DATA c._N m 5' SCUM EAPPIE N ••� ��•— ..1. `OTPI INLET Sri/5 OUTLET STUB STRUCTURE I. t$�<sT-1•'E C V >W • •• (01,0NA) IEEE NOTES 44 5) WATER GIUAUTY FLOW RATE Ws) lug 0 03 m 4 O '1: I • (5[C NOTES A4 s) • • FEAR FLOW RATE(t I dN) 0 3 •4' o m 1 L :• RETURN PER/00 O•PEAR ROW -1: • .0C2 •. .,♦'•. 2'B OUTLL'PP[ CARTRDG[PLOW RATE 15 OR 7.5•-„ ���� C O •1T ♦ •. �OU'SIUE FROM UND`_RORAN MPDIA 1YT ICSr.PERLTE,zrG) ®R�•�- ►` m W < 6 O G;. •�.! .' '� RIM _ ATI• Qj 'J.IT1EFi / P O O O b nee DATA: I,E. 1__ w C 0 it O Y INLET sTUe ( Pr o�rE c BAR` 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW B INLET STUB ®®��L�)/�� W e0.0 :/4 (OPTIONAL) .- R.i'.R-:�IF:71(y7UI.A>♦l•)•1 —` 9 `Oj O OL NOTE'CpNTRAC70R TO G ('a NOT[S MS) CANFlGURAION VERIFY Ex STORM PIPE CX CATc ONS AT 07 U W)F J d b CMGLIR • OIJR-'f E%.CATCH BASMS 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-PLAN VIEW O •r\ , 1 !NM' WIN/I' Client 4.0 LIFTING EYE SLOPED LID AD MLT WAR OPENING ACCPS9 COVER a——_G (^T Or 4) )TOTCYJPECIA RLOIUIRPMENT5: 2 U c ___....;--ii., P V�S INH CRAB ACCESS COKR W CUTLET�L CON ET[COLLAR 1wvPOOL ATION a V 1.....• 7 �4.�4.�o:.41 IUQ `' ❖•••=:•• .RT ..� ..._. IIUNDCWIA ❖.o•_•.�I rr ITYn apppllllllll� ••Ne•4.4.4.44w .w•____w IN M ���'1 INSII7[ IN51a 1 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW O �•'..... .•. . 44 3H' CAPSIDC Z 24'" ♦r4'•• ' M NMANIIQ VAIOCCNr neTw.•wmI MANAMmi INSIOr RAFT RRSp[RW 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTIONVIEW OA 's O ncllo•AwAmwN.mar Project un.ATarw.eaRtc,e. ,.• 1'a 3W' Ser.M.• LsCie TENANT (i82 1 u�.rA x w.ssr.ce. No a.TOrJNn.NN san.m• �2 OIIISID[RIAI �D.rAMr II>e.l.;Aa. Ne GGw,UM,..s.e.+.+M Me.s,Taryze..I.ceW+.sa VZOOS CONTEQI SCrnr•W,eawon• � v,9. q,� le.aw.we.�.s.u..ex, 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-TOP VIEW 1O µ'."''9P'."".�.OP."' IMPROVEMENT MO 02000 CONIEQM 91e1rIlllbr BpllRW W AND �Srs MAMA b.4NIO(U.,e. .rum.) IMPROVEMENT •CIYICI\1 ��H� STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER r O •°om°°D°wTEC"e°" "°°°° 3 A = ■. Gyif STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER CO C1 STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER —.- PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS a■ 1I\/ 3 7555 SW TECH C Tt34 DR s`IORMwA� STANDARD DETAIL- VIEWS UNIT 2 � � TOP VIEW,NOTES AND DATA UJTIONS. STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT SOLUTIONS_ ■ 011lrlONS_ STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT TIC1Af�,OR .NIrJ.wN..r,.wN ,�., rinrm.wN,o,,, o,,,•.I was I*F.- NDNF Ina mumcEl4Nln IIRMANCMNW Ic�NO I aNWer•1..sNAPN DAILI al.,IK.<NOW IF.NYECOW1.OR Iuww,i.a ICMOVRI O - — _ Iw APPROVED .4' EC (� -PAVED PARKING MATTING LOT �•1, RIVER ROCK 2-—3/4-- I r .,2 2.5-- 3'DEEP , 1....Z;� II,1 !�1P/) ALL RIGHTS RESEN OFD /7- '1� `�-, O GROUP MACNENZA W SWALE BOTTOM `i Nr f�±U THESE DRAMNCS ARE M PROPERTY Oi 2' MIN. I �I�� GROUP MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPROWCED IN ANY MANNER. 1(N ,, 1 .1 I' �1' NITNOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION 1 6 ,'.4'AIA►i I� REVISIONS: \,`��11�■��� S4 CLOSING DATE ��FIR I•M� A REVISION DELTA 2-DRAIN ROs fir{ 18-CRC WING MEDIU 33 6'MIN. 6' MIN. SWALE AREA FREEBOARD TREATMENT AREA FREEBOARD BUFFER/MITIGATION AREA 6'MINIMUM WIDTH AREA AREA EC MATTING ECONOJUTE• COCONUT FIBER OR GEOJUTE PLUS ECONOJUTE. EGONOJUTE• (5>20%) SEED MIX LOW CROW MIX NONE LOW CROW MIY AS APPROVED BY SEE NOTE/5 SEE NOTE/5 DISTRICT OR CITY MAX. SLOPE 3:1 3:1 1 FLAT BOTTOUI 4:1 4:1 NA OR AS APPROVED NOTES 1. REFER TO APPENDIX A,CWS DESIGN A CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS,FOR LANDSCAPING SHEET TITLE: SHEET REOUIREMENTS INCLUDING TREE PLACEND1T,TOPSOIL AND PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS. A■ 2. PROVIDE IRRIGATION AS APPROVED BY CRS I1L 3. JUTE MATTING-GEOJUTE PLUS IN TREATMENT AREA.ECONOJUTE FDA AU.OTHER AREAS,OR SIMLLUR FABRICS.COCONUT FIBER IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE 4. 12-1NCHES OF TOPSOR.SHALL BE PLACED THROUGHOUT 714E WATER QUALITY TRACT. 5. FREEBOARD AREA SEED Nix.DWARF TALL FESCUE 40X,DWARF PERENIAL RYE 307E CREEPING RED FESOIE 25%. COLONIAL BENT GRASS 5%.APPLY AT A RATE OF 120f/ACRE. LIDA SWALE C82 N.T.S. ORATIRI BY:MH CHECKED BY: MWB 9EET: 08.2 JOB NO. GIa7RJM/9O MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL — 4/26/13 o a c < c c 3 m a m ?oa ri. O o m m o j 0, N EuvoaEa F, PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE c c c I --- I ,. 'ARBFD,,,,RE ON 1DP SYMBOL / BOTANICAL NAME - WING ' 4i. I COMMON NAME $PACING O ryl�� c 3 n 1 %; - TREES • j . e I+' -o` 1 G m i EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN c m c o P—... •d C V g N m O 1 • O •' O CaL 5 c i ' SIKH, 12 ACER RUBRUM 'FRANKSRED' Y CAL BOB • o 1L 771< o ' ■{ BAY,•, BAY DOCK- w -- RED SUNSET MAPLE AS SHOWN ►' - Y IC 2 mm�a m = NOW O F J�/�//// //// =r`e° `lig I 1 `• L7 UNI—J a.o 1 - 76 BUXUS BEAUTY JAPONICA 'GREEN BEAUTY 1 GAL CONT. S GREEN BEAUTY BOXWOOD AS SHOWN 1 �✓P4' o _ 98 SPIREA X BUMALDA 'COLDFLAME 1 GAL CONT. Client I BD -' I CO DFLAME SPIREA AS SHOWN 1 BD 1 * VER EXISTING GRAVEL I 130 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 1 GAL COWL W y�,�' LOT ���b KINNlKINNICK 24.0.C. ....- .e m ::}:(I 1,805 SF LAWN - CELEBRATION SEED MIX SEED 1-. ,... I SUNMARK SEEDS 10 LBS/1,000 SF 1 EXISTING BULDIN i I 1 o D k..).1., tt'� WATER OUALTTY SWALE-PER CWS I 'oao� II • a ACER CIRCINATUM MIN. HT.2/ I VINE MAPLE AS SHOWN/ I 46 1 1 CAL. CON; 1 �!� I 22 RIBES SANCUfNEUM I 1:€;�11® ,� RED FLOWERING CURRANT / I `_ ` iYP. f.Jh! C AS SHOWN 5 I I ,Sf■ © - `' 17 CORNUS SERICEA 1 GAL C0a{i O - RED-OSIER DOGWOOD AS SHOWN/ MIN. HT. 2 1 ?I um DOOR 1 l:; �o'o°i°,°�1 -'� Y 1,410 JUNCUS PATENS PLUGS I iAi PNESt,411 SPREADING RUSH 6INERI 6' Project : X8'0""` �e�"� 778 SF FREEBOARD AREA SEED MI% SEEDVE�M I .4i;� I DWARF TALL FESCUE 403 120 LBS./ACRE / ,,, , , - DWARF PERENNIAL RYE 5% "'� /m/D.04,,,, yµDOGR ,�; _6�.,'F - CREEPING RED FESCUE 25% fp / / +.Y:' - COLONIAL BENT GRASS 5% I ed � / r //// - COLONIAL BENT CRASS 57I 7555 SIN TECH CENTER DR toe f o T1WfD.OR q ��o� `o°o�oo°oo GENERAL NOTES • cli°'o ^44'b0bS 1. FULLY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED TO MAINTAIN ""'-' ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL . T 4,.,AQtCJ 7la�JB�7IC+.»� � 2. PROVIDE 1/4 INCH HEMLOCK BARK MULCH AT A DEPTH OF 2 INCHES THROUGHOUT TYPO % �i `��i,6 RNE NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS,EXCEPT STORMWATER FACILITY. -- I l ; - '/ - �#, 3. SEE CIVIL SHEET C8.2 FOR WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAIL ' &OCR.% \ I / I KEYNOTES 0 `••` ( ' 1. BIKE RACK - SEE CIVIL GROUP RRCNENZE 2D13 4 7 -. :12 2. CONCRETE SPLASH PAD - SEE CIVIL © ALL RIGORS RESERVED GROIN MACKENZE AND ARE NOT TO BE THESE DRAWINGS ARE IRE PROPERTY OF SITE COVERAGE DATA USED OR R IITTTEN ANY ln MANNER, - _ - i - EXISTING CONDITION FINAL CONDITION REVISIONS:- TOTAL SITE AREA: 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) D 5 R[M9b15 REVISION DELTA LANDSCAPE AREA: 61,803 SF (1.40 AC) 63,459 SF (1.46 AC) 0X SHEET CLOSING DAZE SW TECH CENTER DR 41111 LANDSCAPE PLAN ' SCALE: 1- = 30' SHEET TITLE: 0 PLAN SCAaPE " PLAIN b 0 IS ](I 60 ,,, (IN FELT1 I mob■ 30 ft --. DRAWN BY:TED CHECKED BY RMt. SHEET: L2.1 1 JOB NO. 213 7.00 MAJOR MODIRCAI1ON SUBMITTAL — 4/26/13 I C, < Q C C 3 O 00 o e a o v Q O «o INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REQUIRED « o c, BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT. o c m r SCH. 40 MAINLINE GATE VALVES, UNIONS&SCH. 80 NIPPLES ' 0`o c AND ELL TO BE SAME SIZE AS VAULT WITH LOCKABLE VALVE BOX AND COVER: ¢ BACKFLOW PREVENTER. LID AMAETEK 11X1 7 WITH GREEN ISOLATION VAV1.E IN LAWN AREAS AND 3 n BR SCH 80 ADAPTED &FITTINGS TO BE BR OWN LID IN SHRUB AREAS ;m FINISH GRADE SAME SIZE AS ISOLATION VALVE. A ■A DOUBLE CHECK VALVE FINISH GRADE VALVE BOX WITH c c o 1°iN! 11!n_1 4'PVC SLEEVE I!- ° o m _ LOCKABLE LID )m Ii=11: 11=::: UNION EACH SIDE 7YP. i I M METER PER CIVIL 1=°-� I n=1 FINISH GRADE 1�i111 111-11 MALE ADAPTER/REDUCER MANUAL DRAIN VALVE —11-11=11—I1"11• 111=11-11—II-11— �� f!i 1111 zirmiII iz. mi=11=Irmum11 REDUCER BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1=11 \ \`- his= NIPPLES '•—__ H ELL AND PPLE IaII11 11!f-! Ra=�i1r1�: o r_i � ��911)•, �- ,-� =11=11=11=11IPVolif !:•.::ial11�11 'IIaII-IIa1PI 1•ZC._11 11-IIE m E. o GATE VALVE idp.. 110= Tom' Tall-IIC11=mum t:7:4 =-!r•1!"'lla! DRAIN ROCK- 11z11�11z11-11-•.:.•_.-••.; nir MAINLINE - 6 2 a V °c a II011�li-. 11!: 11-11-1'•,u ��:i.-°,/�all= 3 CU. FT. MIN. EliEliCIICII"' . 11CI�OCI1m, ISOLATION/GATE VALVE. -0 C O °N__ SCH 40 MAINLINE I�! 1-11.11' .1�ur:•;•. !p.iCll�l Ilallallalla�.!'•.i'•�IO�i�-Ilallall EOUtPPED FOR KEYED >..A,c e, QUICK COUPLER - lei II=IIa1P11a11::►_i•• I1a11�11 '11-11-1111=11-11m11z11-1:�IIDC:�IIa 0 0 o.1--I O.A°0 i•�:1 ' :,li-•" BRICK OR CONCRETE r- 11=11=11011M1C11=11=11=11=11:!1p11a:! OPERATION 1_-.-'r 'a.-:_•••-r_•e. .. ii Ia11.11.11.11.11 t;t=!=!t:�:11C11O1 :H=020_11-Ii=�1=UC11en=1i_e_i1=a=iu BLOCK 7YP. II�IPIIallalla!::is a;•;II2II=II -II�II�II�IICIICII-11-11-Il�ll�li�ll� 4'MIN. DRAIN ROCK i:neu_N_irn-11_11-11-11=1111-•;eq=' 1111-11-IPII-11-11�11�11-11�11�11�:! a a< :ne�Ien=u=i1=-n_an=P1=-n__l=ir_gi11 Iallallallallatl!=::!:!!:1111C11�1 _ DRAIN ROCK 4'DEEP 11=11=11 7.11:1Pt:!'!;!a:r ll:llall 'll'11�11�11�11C11'll'll'll'll�ll�ll� BRICK OR CON=. BLOCK MAINLINE 1-II�II�IICIIr11�: !;t r4 pllall-1 11CIIa 11=11:11=1P11-11-11-11-11-11-11 Ilall=llallall-Uauontura all �I�aII�IIa�IS11C11��1��1�11�11C11�11� mr.ramilmi=lraiIallal mll-11 1 �v 11a11a11a11aIla11al1a1la11allall 1 POINT OF CONNECTION BACKFLOW PREVENTER MANUAL DRAIN VALVE Q ISOLATION/GATE VALVE Yer L8.1 SCALE: NTS : BELOW GRADE SCALE NTS SCALE: NTS 11E7 SCALE NTS VALVE BO%WITH COVER FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCM FINISH GRADE QUICK-COUPLING VALVE MI AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER ' PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE Project PAVING CLEAN AND LIGHTLY a WITH LOCKABLE DOOR 1� 3 INCH MINIMUM DEPTH .- COMPACTED BACKFILL � �� M OF 3/4 INCH WASHED z SCH b CONDUIT FOR IIIPROVEIVENT COMMON AND CONTROL GRAVEL S TRACKING TAPE 6' a��' WIRES TO EXTEND 5• ABOVE PIPE� BRICK _� _ BEYOND EDGE OF BUILDING 111 1111 11_111=1 ,III—��lol CONDUIT FOR 120 VOLT 7555 sw TECH CBQT6i oR PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE z _ ELECTRICAL SERVICE WITH TIGAFD,OR 1 PVC SCH b TEE OR ELL 2 II' CLEAN BACKFILL 111-111.' °111-111 LATERAL LINE 11 11=111_Ij�llI!1-1 JUNCTION BOX =. .. PVC SCH b STREET ELL 7 '.,`✓1_ :ffJ1 MAININE 1 �_�r t PMAINLINE PIPE PVC SCH b ELL ��� %JI IlI—III—III—III—III—Iii ATTACH IRRIGATION WIRE I: ''� INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL TO MAINLINE AT I ',�„�11,! i' ELECTRICAL CODE. 2'%2'REDWOOD STAKE NOTE: INTERVALS OF 25'-0• - 11MI1111•U11w�' VERIFY LOCATION PRIOR WITH STAINLESS STEEL EXTEND IRRIGATION .� TO INSTALLATION. GEAR CLAMPS SLEEVES 18'BEYOND EACH SIDE OF PAVING. INSTALL CONTROLLER PER MANUFACTURER'S , SPECS CTIOHS. SEE © l AO«cE TOE'D' 5 QUICK COUPLING VALVE IRRIGATION SLEEVES AT PAVING IRRIGATION TRENCH Q WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER '"ELI DRAWINGS"� E NOT TO E CHESS MAWINGSE AND ARE NOT PROPERTY BE L81 SCALE: NTS SCALE: NT5 ® USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNED. SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SED OR PRIOR WRITTEN ANY MANNER. COILED WIRE REVISIONS: WATERPROOF CONNECTION VALVE BOX WITH COVER g RWISTNS REVISION DELTA 5 Iles CLOSING DATE sm FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH PAVEMENT OR CURB REMOTE CONTROL VALVE r 101. TOP OF SPRINKLER FLUSH PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE T"7.. WITH FINISH GRADE, AFTER SETTLING PVC SCH. 40 ELL FINISH GRADE v. '.---M V/r 4,.;\% PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE Ti/ C\ ‘j�� C�11; �'Oj�\OJBRICK 71P. i``i!`i��p�iPOP-UP SPRINKLER ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER\/� , T - r\//.P PVC SCM. b TEE OR ELL. �45� q BARBED MARLS%INSERT 1 1 I 1 ,i,∎11' PVC SCH 40 NIPPLE IRRI AM '1' ,G%OBI �i��; r a iii z,�" LENGTH AS REQUIREDT r !- &THREADED ELL ) 7�1 °�r�S�I! SCH.80 NIPPLE AND SCH. �pJi �i`�^, °• ° PVC SCH 40 ELL' �r�s // �r�!11' ��/�/�l 40 ELL. &J �'2�✓y! POLY SWING PIPE-MIN. 15' tO� ' '%�///,. B a �� LENGTH MAX 30'LENGTH PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL r.rA t1$3• , //j PVC MAINLINE PIPE \�Q./!__ I 4t0114° • ' ".' :'..0e BARBED MARLEX INSERT ���_��� d &THREADED ELL � -a ' PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL \\ �\r\r\r\iii i r�ii\ri�ii\�i %\\∎s'`� " PVC SCH. 40 MALE 4'4'10 Q\Q@�\�� J\ , ADAPTER SCH. 80 TEE We DRAWN BY TEB PVC LATERAL PIPE LATERAL LINE 3'MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4' PVC LATERAL PIPE =NECKED BY:RML WASHED GRAVEL SHEET: s ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SPRAY POP-UP SPRINKLER ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER L8.1 L8.1 SCALE: NTS NTS SCALE: NTS JOB NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 p t7 C m L Q.. c c 3 W pm o m y d m^. .m «^ p m Tp U m m O O p M N N L d EDGE OF GROUNDCOVER U m C, AREA/WAUC EDGE ' a-c-I lam,/ ��C� DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS ;m vii CV ' \\I HOSE CHAFING GUARD SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL �� 1/2 THE SPECIFIED O.C. °^ �/'w u^I 2"ABOVE FINISH GRADE SPACING m GUY CABLE AND REMOVE BURLAP AND �� ROW EDGE OF SNRUB/GROUNDCOVER p c Li TWINE FROM TOP HALF • c c ('�. OF ROOTBALL • O� TRI-SPACE, AT SPECIFIED •'R AREA/WALK EDGE a o <n 111 2 x 2 x B.WOOD STAKE 1 • O.C.DISTANCE- ' DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS ' p c a r \Y�/ KEEP CLEAR OF ROOTBALL \. 1/2 THE SPECIFIED O.C. • _ m c o¢ o 1 MULCH, 2'DEPTH EOU1DI57AN7 c ‘,.., / •11111 PLANT CENTER • / SPACING �i W m Z ' SET CROWN FINISH ROOTBALL GRADE r FINISH GRADE • • •� ROW °:o`m v a 7 NMI 3'ABOVE FlNISN GRADE `�'. z w 24.3 = AND REMOVE BURLAP AND Gi•' •�i��ii��ti�!�i s•7.�ei_ti fir♦ TRI-SPACE, AT SPECIFIED M WIRE BASKETS FROM TOP u=u=11-R- 71-11=11=.11. MULCH, 2'DEPTH . m `0 0 n HALF OF ROOTBALL 11=1111=11=1 ' -"-0II_u_I FERTILIZER TABLETS �,� O.C.DISTANCE- L7 U F- a N AAA.A- t.�s��• , ?ti'r�fi`� 11=11=11=11= I,,,"' o .11-11 -�.r";� �:., .= EQUIDISTANT 1= 11=1111=1 II II II-11=1 pmt xl I MULCH, r DEPTH 11=11=11=11= -11-11-11 I __�►�i 11 II II r.11�I��I .� '� ROOTBALL t PLANT CENTER c 1„111 J 11=11=11=11= 11 71=n PLANTING SOIL FINISH GRADE 1=11=11=11 II/� /���f AMENDED SOIL • -n- l 11=11=11=11=,. u ! II II=11 w/�� _ I 11 11-II=R. II II'll II II II II R N 1_11=1 ////////� I� FERTILIZER TABLETS u u n=u. a=II II II II II II II a a=u-��. x i 0, = - 1= COMPACT PLANTING SOIL s i r I I I u =IL 11 n umn-n:'11____.= PLANTING SOIL 2 x ROOTBALL II =III II—IIll—II—II 1I NATIVE SOIL LLI =1 I-I h NATIVE SOIL I i I T I \ COMPACT PLANTING SOIL NATIVE SOIL ®TREE PLANTING - DOUBLE STAKE CONTAINER/B+B SHRUB PLANTING GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 40 SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER SPACING / SCALE: NTS SCALE NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS Project LaCie TENANT IMPROVEMENT 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR TIGARD,OR A r. .','TE'.[E-v'. . REVISIONS: 6 4 RCTSU6 REVISION DaTA TTHIS CLOSING DATE 9[rr SHEET TITLE: PLANTING DETAILS DRAWN BY:TES CHECKED BY:RAIL SHEET: L8.2 JOB NO. C h7V00V, \J7900 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 1 J ei a ce > 2 G G O6 O7 O8 O 10 11 3m zsT'-D' m m a °r m 1'-0•4 24'-0- / 24'-0' , 24'-0• / 24'-0• I 24'-0• z4'-0' 24'-0• 24'-0• I 24'-0• / 24'-0' / o m co I( • • _ CD 07 N L S o i I U O G - J NEW FIRE D ACCESS DOOR O • Al A >q Dw D D —Dw V o c 5 a°o L G p >A7 I •• 0 m oE= c n c 2 o W o a o c m o p n O`" 0 NEW FIRE I o W c y°A`! ACCESS DOOR o PR.,r, ION W U of H J O.RD KEE ° 5.953 g r giant O • • o o a a ow • ow• I � O 55 W INFILL DRIVE-IN DOOR WITH STOREFRONT J1/ ° er0 If WAR SE m WX".3 rag 31,040 SF op " aftlflitllItI4 -- laiii• O r e a n° Project _f Lags TENANT J r NEW STOREFRONT IMPROV T I 1 L - [ EI ]] WINDOW + C + � J n o NEW SIRE R PA R '�' I U '�M �CR ACCESS DOOR ® _L J INF1LL DRIVE-IN 2.902 r L DOOR r ' il - F WITH STOREFRONT o r--am me 1 r-_,8.881 = T 7 1 REPLACE SOLID REMODEL EXISTING I 1"i 1 r F- + H F STOREFRIONi DOOR OFFICE MEZZANINE DOOR -2-- .■ ---1--+IT O W op ir � I I I I I I I R°1 cADUR NAaENZ[12 _! �::P�L__L _L__L_1__J © Au RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRANINGS Ir � GROUP NACXENZIE IANO THE RE NOT�T0! 11 _, OIy r-, r_, 311 OR REPRODUCED IN ANY YANNEA. e IIIIIIIIIIT=■ �" hTH b r i r, 111111111111 MTNOUT PRIOR aR r EN RERUISS ON I© 1 H-H I ILL 11 JJI 1L I - REDNS:�- Q O r�l +1 rT- ©1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e Wo scE CLOSING DATE t II R ° ` t r t O 1 F NEW FIRE INFILL DRI IN `NEW DOCK V ACCESS DOOR TO CREATE EW RETAINING WALL I I I DOCK DOOR 1 I r I 1'-D' 24'-C 24-O / 24'-0' • 24'-0' 24'-0' f 24'-0' • 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' , 24'-0' 24'_0• 24'_0• 24'-Cr - 0■ 0 0 240 O O O O O 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 a OVERALL FLOOR FLAN � iii >I OVERALL FLOOR PLAN I/16' 1-0 CO MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN / 1/16•-1-0- LEGEND DRAWN BY EW CHECKED BY:RCT A 9'x10'OH DOCK DOOR ® NEW FULL HEIGHT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE WALL SLEET: SEE DETAIL_ DRIVE-IN DOOR A2.0 NEW iHRU GRID WALL, SEE DETAIL CONCRETE TILT PANEL W/FURRING, SEE_ NEW TOILET ROOM WALL. SEE DETAIL TromInnoniamto EXISTING BEARING WALL TO REMAIN NEW PLUMBING W ALL, SEE DETAIL_ EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN JOB NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODF$CATION SUBMITTAL -4/36/13 a C m < C ; O m ry - mm n c - L CI o CO m O m O O :°.• G O O n p.N .,p. 1 2 O O O 1 O 0 I 1 `C J <®w m Coo.S '3 .2 C U >O) - oEnL ®cE O ® _ - - _ 2GOa o W or m p N O O` O. � O m 9 W«n e Y N Ce l.7 U.:X 1-J a.MX■\ \--/. Chen F - - - - j © 1r ,1 W ....._,,,,,, ... __ _ _ _tu _al �,F r-- — -- — ---- -- z_3 E-] C__7 C__3 I 0 12 L / LI ... i 0 © 3 ye _21 TYP 7YP. 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A3.3 1/9'-1.-o' Project Lads TENANT IMPROVEMENT 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR F TICAFD,OR E 0 < O 1 0 Am 0 ON,►tz��0 ;m saaak` np ® NEEFAMNGS ARE THE PROPERTY a CROUP MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE USED OP REPRPOUCEX IN ANY MANNER. WITHOUT PYCE NRITTEN PERMISSION lw...� ( I MM �_ REVISIONS:•\ \q\ � _ ,�• I Q'HET CLOSHON NA I 1 J L—_ J O O ° O 0 (i 0 • 1911 EAST ELEVATION SFIEET TITLE: 1/8--o•-o- SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES A. VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL CONDITIONS NOTIFY ARCHITECT 1. EXISTING OH DOOR TO REMAIN. ' DRAWN BY ELJ OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 2. EXISTING 3"x7'HM DOOR TO REMAIN. PAM ALL NEW WORK TO MATCH 8. PAINT,PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS DAMAGED 3. EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW TO REMAIN. BY NEW WORK TO NEW CONDITION. 4. NEW 9'x10 INSULATED OH DOCK DOOR. ExISTrx�BULDrIG SCHEME CHECKED BY:RCT C. SAW CUT NEW OPENINGS-DO mar OUp1DIIT 5. NEW EDGE OF DOCK LEVELER. SHEET: 6. NEW STOREFRONT WINDOW. SEE SHEET A3.5. 7. NEW 3'x7 STOREFRONT DOOR. 8. EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR. ^x^ 9. INFILL WALL `{J `,{J 10. NEW RETAINING WALL. 11. SPANDREL GLASS 12. 3'x7'INSULATED HM DOOR. BY PERMIT BUP2013-00083 JOB NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 .v..w..w..9-43-30s W WISP.IAN 1.1N■ o W c c <° al c c . 1 -ta °,- m "^ Om m® 7: O O O _ OZ R)N L-C 0 O O O O z �m 4 1 1 1 1 . 4�J ;a n. 1'Mf O Cp Nj 7 G O O L V 7 f7 - _ ' O b m C C 4 U -s. 1 m W o< S m c_40 0 - W?6 U C N ce T. 2 4 G 1 T7 ED U it)FJ a S Oal.r.E s. _ \ _ _ \- - - . LLI �- -- / d ob d a 1 NORTH ELEVATION A3.4 I/8"-I'-o" Project Lags 18JANT IMPROVEMENT /� 7555 SW TECH CENT@i DR q < � ^ D TK3ARD,OR _ Y Y QE F I ■ © GROUP MAG(ENZE 2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERe£D THESE GRANINGS ARE TIE PROPERTY OP GROUP MACRENZIE AND ARE NOT TO RE USED Gt REPRODUCED IN ANT ROARER. WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION / // -10 REVISIONS: � i Rli9]6 REVISION DELTA uo MS CLOSING DATE - - - - - - - - - - - T J� -1 L L _t b 0 WEST ELEVATION MEET TITLE NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES A. VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL CONDITIONS NOTIFY ARCHITECT 1. EXISTING OH DOOR TO REMAIN. OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 2. EXISTING .Y HM DOOR TO REMAIN. PAM ALL NEW WORK TO MATCH DRANK BY:ELI B. PAINT,PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS DAMAGED 3. EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW TO REMAIN. EXISTING DIN(SCHEME CHECKED BY RCT BY NEW WORK TO NEW CONDITION. 4. EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR. C. SAW CUT NEW OPENINGS-DO NOT O■lI■CUT 5. NEW 3'x7 NM DOOR. SHEET. 8. NEW CONCRETE STAIR. 7. HANDRAIL SEE DETAIL 7/A8.2 BY FOR REFERENCE PERMIT BI P2013-000B3 A3.4 ONLY MB NO. .0 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL- 4/26/13 wuR\a+.AA.JP MA O.n.iu SA<O L.WM CleanWater Services March 15, 2013 SPL expires March 15, 2015 GROUP MACKENZIE 1515 SE WATER AVE PORTLAND OR 97293 RE: Parking Lot Improvements CWS file 13-000426 (Tax map 2S101 DC Tax lot 04500) Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Area Certification for the above referenced site. District staff has reviewed the submitted materials including site conditions and the description of your project. Staff concurs that the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing Sensitive Areas found near the site. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on,your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 681-3639. Sincerely, Laurie Harris Environmental Plan Review Attachment(1) 550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 hnnP: (5031681-1600 • Fax: (5031681-3603 • cleanwatercervices.ora 0 N N I✓ N 4 O r ,, APPED SIGNIFICANT LEGEND il 3� "'HABITAT (4,750 SF ON SITE) a , . IS PROPERTY BOUNDARY $,. LOT UNE -- gd V' h,F CENTERLINE OF ROAD !rJ PI 1' CONTOUR _255 1111 5' CONTOUR 255 111 i MAPPED SIGNIFICANT HABITAT AREA LIGHTLY LIMIT • 4,750.5 SF (0.11 AC.) II 1 li II __ 2012 GIS DATA PROVIDED BY CITY P Saev�,'e z.,s' -- OF TIGARD AND METRO Pile-DA z t °p"'°�+.+�+., 1 MAPPED VEGETATED CORRIDOR W iii..4 1 h I '.�+•. I 2012 GIS DATA PROVIDED BY CITY ��� 112.5 SF (0.003 AG) .,,,, OF TIGARD AND METRO ~ + MAPPED HABITAT AREA / 110.0 SF (0.005 AC.) d -iN .. I 20120 G15 DATA PROVIDED BY CITY jjjj�j �I +-- OF TIGARD AND METRO 4 1 TOTAL SENSITIVE LANDS; 4,972.5 SF _ i c c cTG, °� �3(oN c s cTto'J Q ti 5,„:„.5 ( 4 c 0-4-2,c)) sETt Lo r 3.x3.24, lr - i i EXISTING BUILDING A g v eiipteoctct c a r..;4C1"S Cte 411Tt -e is ievul b c 4 r '0 i MI 1 i c6 AK Iwi Ka vegA r-D44wA.y 5 aroifi%te� +14e x MAI ' t e4evelONprvt - {vv 4 0. ' t G��� p`•�, „ /� Approved tr.v.4.,..._„1„„i. k Daze � • �► ,..�,�:...,.�,� Uce�� Water Se i es a�rr fri4,44‘itail Da r5 .�,I� t8 O�lI"j 3 ■,.,O CaCmae , - MOM LOCO 4111.1 J ! ._ ,, --- ewrl n MAIM 1111 WS i — g.11'.65 I MAPPED VEGETATED CORRIDOR __SW H C.E11( aA — .i (110 SF ON SI _. -_ _. EX1 ' - rg 0 a F'FELMARY OSLY-2/21/19' W GROUP MACKENZIE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Existing Site Conditions 1 Proposed Site Development 2 Conclusion 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Exhibit 1 -Simplified Site Assessment Site Plan 2. Exhibit 2-Site Photographs with Keyed Site Plan Simplified Site Assessment Narrative To Clean Water Services For La Cie,LLC Tenant Improvement Submitted March 1,2013 Project Number 2130079.00 GROUP MACKENZIE Since 1960 RiverEast Center I PO Box 14310 I Portland,OR 97293 1515 SE Water Ave,Suite 100 I Portland,OR 97214 T 503.224.9560 I F 503.228.1285 I www.grpmack.com GROUP —MACKENZIE . INTRODUCTION The property tenant and applicant, LaCie Corporation (LaCie) is proposing to re- develop the existing industrial development at their property in Tigard, Oregon. The 5.00-acre project site is located entirely on Tax Lot 4500 of Map 2S-1-01DC. The site is bounded by existing industrial development to the north, east, and south, and by undeveloped industrial property and the WES train tracks to the west. The purpose of this report is to document the existing and proposed site conditions with regard to the sensitive areas on and near the site, as required for the Service Provider Letter application process. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently developed with a tilt-up concrete building with asphalt paved parking and truck circulation aisles on all four sides. The western portion of the site is developed as an open gravel pad which is used primarily for outdoor storage. The existing site is generally level around the building, but the areas outside the developed portions of the site are sloped. The adjacent topography generally slopes down to the southwest corner of the site. The northern edge of the asphalt paved lot is cut into the existing slope, which is retained by a concrete wall approximately 4 to 5 feet high. The southwest corner of the site slopes down steeply about 10 feet from the edge of the parking lot to Tech Center Drive. The existing site contains approximately 2.70 acres of impervious surfaces, plus approximately 0.88 acre of gravel surfacing. Current GIS mapping indicates boundaries of potential sensitive areas along the western edge of the site, as well as near the southwest corner of the site. The western sensitive area contains approximately 4,750 sf of primarily tree canopy vegetated area on the subject site. The canopied area extends approximately 50 ft into the neighboring property. Beyond the edge of the tree canopy, the adjacent property has been recently logged. The photographs below demonstrate this area. i/yr iv . �t 3 'i. 74, J .r 'w . . Photograph 1 : Western Site Boundary Photograph 2: Adjacent Lot Trees The sensitive area at the southwest corner of the site consists of the vegetated corridor setback for a tributary channel of Fanno Creek that extends from an outfall of the storm main located within SW Tech Center Drive. While the channel itself is located across the street from the site, the mapped boundary of the vegetated corridor extends into southern edge of the site by approximately 5 feet. Approximately 112 sf of the vegetated corridor is shown by GIS mapping to extend onto the subject site. As H:\Projects\213007900\PLANNING\Simplified Site Assessment Norrotive.docx 1 GROUP MACKENZIE shown in the photographs below, this area is generally low-quality vegetated corridor that primarily consists of the paved area of Tech Center Drive. tr-Ac5 i , _ a Gal k SO III_ 91111''_ lid - i A •r :. .�. 'ter Photographs 3-4: Mapped Vegetated Corridor Area PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT LaCie proposes to remodel the existing building and expand the existing paved parking lot to accommodate additional trucks and passenger cars. The site re- development will include addition of approximately 8,500 sf of new impervious surface, which will primarily be located within the existing gravel-surfaced storage yard. As shown in the attached Exhibit 1, the proposed development does not encroach into the mapped boundaries of the on-site sensitive areas. No off-site improvements are proposed for this development. CONCLUSION LaCie proposes to re-develop their existing industrial property on SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard, Oregon. As described in the preceding narrative, the proposed development will primarily occur within existing developed areas on site and will not impact the mapped on-site sensitive areas. Therefore, the proposed development meets the applicable Clean Water Services protections for the nearby sensitive areas and warrants approval for a Service Provider Letter. H:\Projects\213007900\PLANNING\Simplified Site Assessment Narrative.docx 2 GROUP MACKENZIE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 II. Existing Drainage Conditions 2 III. Proposed Drainage Conditions 2 IV. Storm Water Quality Treatment 2 V. Stormwater Runoff Quantity Control 3 VI. Stormwater Conveyance System 3 VII. Maintenance and Operations 3 VIII. Conclusion 3 ATTACHMENTS Stormwater 1. Figure 1 -Drainage Basin Map Management Report 2. Figure 2-LIDA Swale Details 3. Figure 3-Stormfilter Catch Basin Details 4. Appendix A-Water Quality Sizing Calculations To City of Tigard 5. Appendix B-Stormwater Runoff Detention Calculations 6. Appendix C-Operations and Maintenance Guide For LaCie Tenant Improvement ,�� .o PROFFs Submitted co �� 01 N� 'P Sjo2 April 8,2013• j82 Project Number 2130079.00 1OREGON 2 P ON ✓le 2,20\ 4' 5' ~r0ANIEt. GROUP MACKENZIE Since 1960 EXPIRES: 12/31// RiverEast Center I PO Box 14310 I Portland.OR 97293 1515 SE water Ave.Suite 100 I Portland,OR 97214 T 503.224.9560 I F 503.228.1285 I www.grpmack.com GROUP MACKENZIE I. INTRODUCTION The proposed LaCie Tenant Improvement site redevelopment includes improvements to the existing industrial development at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard, Oregon. The proposed site improvements include re-grading and re-paving of existing paved parking areas, expansion of paved parking into an existing gravel storage yard, and construction of landscape islands with new planting. The project site comprises tax lot 2S 101 DC04500 in Washington County. As shown on the attached vicinity map, the site is located on the north side of SW Tech Center Drive and is bounded by existing industrial development to the east and south. Existing residential development is located along the north side of the site. The Tri- Met WES tracks pass by the west side of the site, and the southern corner of an undeveloped industrial property is located at the northwest corner of the project site. -• AIM • 1.1 xdientieHlipl Erma AMA l; - NI MOH Canal. Project Site Map NOT TO SCALE H:\Projects\213007900 CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 1 GROUP MACKENZIE The purpose of this report is to summarize the stormwater management approach for the proposed redevelopment of this site. The proposed stormwater facilities have been designed in accordance with meet the guidelines presented in the current Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). II. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The project site is currently developed as an industrial warehouse and office building, with asphalt paved parking on all sides of the building. The western portion of the site is covered with a gravel outdoor storage yard. The site generally slopes to the south and west, and stormwater runoff from the paved areas is collected in trapped catch basins which lead to a piped stormwater collection system that discharges to the public storm system in SW Tech Center Drive. The public system discharges to a tributary channel of Fanno Creek located at the western end of the street, approximately 200 feet southwest of the site. No existing stormwater treatment facilities are present on site, and the runoff currently flows un-detained to the public storm system. Based on review of the existing utility systems and local topography, it appears that the project site does not receive stormwater run-on from the adjacent properties. 111. PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The proposed site improvements include addition of approximately 3,800 sf of new asphalt paving, and redevelopment of approximately 4,280 sf of existing paving. The new asphalt paving will be located along the west side of the parking area, in an area that is currently covered with gravel surfacing. The proposed stormwater system improvements will utilize the existing storm conveyance piping and will generally maintain the existing drainage patterns on site. The proposed redevelopment includes no new connections to the public storm main or outfalls to the surface drainage channel. The proposed stormwater quality treatment system includes a low-impact development approach (LIDA) swale and Stormfilterr) water quality catch basins. These facilities are described in detail in the following sections. IV. STORM WATER QUALITY TREATMENT Stormwater runoff from the new paving will be treated with a new LIDA swale located along the west edge of the parking area, which will provide water quality treatment and quantity control for the new paved area. The swale overflow will connect to the existing on-site piped storm system. Sizing calculations for the LIDA swale are presented in Appendix A. Clean Water Services standards require that the site redevelopment include water quality treatment for the redeveloped paving areas, as well as 25% of the total impervious area on site. The proposed redeveloped paving areas are located in the truck loading and handicap parking areas on the south side of the building. Water quality treatment for the re-developed paving areas and for the additional existing pavement requiring treatment will be provided in two Stormfilter'' water quality catch basins, which will be installed at the existing catch basin locations on site. The water quality catch basins will each include a single filter cartridge to meet Clean Water H:\Projects\213007900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 2 GROUP -KrACKENZIE Services treatment requirements. Sizing calculations for the water quality catch basins are presented in Appendix A. V. STORMWATER RUNOFF QUANTITY CONTROL Stormwater runoff quantity control will be provided by the LIDA facility, which has been over-sized to provide additional runoff storage capacity above the design water quality storm event. Flow control from the facility is provided primarily by infiltration into the underlying soils. The infiltration capacity of the facility has been designed using an assumed infiltration rate of 1 inch per hour. Detention facility sizing calculations are presented in Appendix B. VI. STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM Runoff from the LaCie site will be conveyed to the public storm main using the existing storm drainage piping system on site. Since the majority of the proposed site construction will involve redevelopment of existing pavement, there is no expected increase in the runoff from the redeveloped areas. The expanded parking area along the west edge of the site will result in an increased runoff; however, the LIDA drainage facility has been sized to fully infiltrate stormwater runoff for storm events up to the 25-year storm, based on the assumed 1- inch-per-hour infiltration rate. Therefore, no additional runoff is expected to reach the existing on-site piping system from the expanded parking. An overflow riser is provided in the LIDA facility to capture runoff from high-flow storms in the event that the facility does not fully infiltrate the runoff flows. The overflow pipe will direct the runoff to the existing on-site pipe system. VII. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Maintenance of the proposed stormwater facilities at the LaCie site is expected to be completed by the property owner or tenant. The LIDA swale and Stormfilter catch basin structures have different maintenance requirements, which are summarized in Appendix C of this report. The party responsible for maintenance of the stormwater facilities is expected to refer to this appendix as a guide for inspection and maintenance frequency for each facility, and to keep a log of maintenance activities. VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed LaCie tenant improvement and site redevelopment includes construction of new asphalt and concrete pavement and installation of new stormwater quality and flow control facilities. As described in the above report and the attached appendices, the stormwater management approach used on this site has been designed in accordance with Clean Water Services and City of Tigard standards and guidelines. H:\Projects\213007900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 3 ....:::::::::.f::.:...:::::::.!.i::::::.ii V - - / - - C Q W C C 3 W 588•30'24"E 321.15' o 1 •o 6 _ - - - ,�� ; _ = CGNCRE7FRETMNHN�w DRAINAGE BASIN SUMMARY o0 •:� _ MiH 4'CYq,pplE FENCE k BARBEp HIRE ON TOP :e fA N . .. .. . . I tI` ��'lia _ BASIN A: EXPANDED WEST PARKING a�J 1 ASPNALi , r,, ��, _ NEW PAVING: 3,800 SF ASPHALT PAVING <W 3 �\ EXISTING PAVING DRAINING TO SWALE: 8,380 SF co : w I � i I k §: i::::. ,i1' I ASPHALT BASIN B. TRUCK DOCK BASIN G° GRAVEL " a• 00 :::::::::.::::::.::.:4::!!-?..; ; _ 1 AIRS I NEW PAVING: 2,540 SF ASPHALT PAVING s°°�� '"' �-' (167.31') TN-MAC NAIL �� • _ - , 17316 I EXISTING PAVING IN BASIN. , 60 SF • Odi' BAYVOOOR 71'i : cs - ,MII ►� �, c.`4 OC I ® w .o, lc BASIN C: PARKING LOT BASIN I .1'. �: % // // '�% / z - SWOP °cam . : � ;;;: MAN,DOOR I, NEW PAVING: 1,740 SF ASPHALT PAVING 15 0 ..° T.N LOT 1 EXISTING PAVING IN BASIN: 13.960 SF m : `� 00 t9 vm1-_, a°e TECH CENTER BUSINESS P ,R I �� `" POST rosy I MO I LACIE, LTD I / ':.::.::,: d I TAX LOT 4500 I ``".:: I MAP 2S-1-01L, I o 18 5.01 ACRES J N� I M=41. ::: . ■ m 3 • ••••. a� i EXISTING .ii:::::: �:.:•::.:.::i:: ,, I : o� I ASPHALT , BUILDING >r :: LIDA `mu W ' .`;:.:,•ti o I I MAN DOOR i ! 5 ■ , SWALE , 4. �� VER1 F1PE' LA CIE TENANT +� IMPROVEMENT 1 •/ ////// //// MAN DOOR AI Q�s ASPHALT REDEVELOPMENT•- -.. .- -...-- la: II Ili"II ; .;,.i. !C aI cr. 1. 42,,,;II u Lid Sl'- MAN DOOR ////♦SS I al./I/���y ''�1 J_ , MAN DOOR Al�� \ 1 ��� ���. ' © Gr w"IXENIIE Y013�/ I , O IFa Au Rl RESERIEU',� � IIIli� TlESE DRAWpGS IRE TIE PROPERTY Oi / I�%Air �°��I ���� SHEET TITLE: iompe10 � - 6•PINE STORM •6'CYCLONE �^:.'_.:3) �i. A ► : randlevaiiiri6; ` _ O�ii.`' _�L 10 I BASIN MAP 6 b I_ TlJ• ►' ASPHALT I� $. 76; •, DATE: O,i, s (1`arms: �� �� '_' DRAWN BY: sue- T \ 1.1 (1��7 BDN J N8619'37"W _ CHECKED BY: 1► IV- 11•- — .� 589'03'00"W _ L=98125.00.89' R= ' • ST 0 SHEET: R=141.55' � WATER QUALITY— .: - FIG. 1 — —�_SINS 6 / / — — roe ,u o: 79.00 213007900\CALLS\FIGURE 1 BASIN MAP.DWG BDN 04/03/13 16:25 1:50 VINYL CLAD CHAIN LINK FENCING SEE STD. DETAIL NO. 740 - APPROVED I �' EC �(i�f' PAVED PARKING MATTING LOT r - - _ __ __ RIVER ROCK 2" -3/4= rr► ,'I�•r 2.5"- 3" DEEP �..�,p►=- 1 -r, �tt�, SWALE BOTTOM %Ilk �h ->�:, I_ 2' MIN. i i 'P /;:.•-' - y _v 0.5' MAX. `4: • O 4,1 - ;%/ } �` iiiii// I VII I.W- 12" DRAIN ROCK 18" GRC WING MEDIU 6" MIN. 6" MIN. SWALE AREA FREEBOARD TREATMENT AREA FREEBOARD BUFFER/MITIGATION AREA 6' MINIMUM WIDTH AREA AREA EC MATTING ECONOJUTE* COCONUT FIBER OR GEOJUTE PLUS* ECONOJUTE* ECONOJUTE* (S> 20%) SEED MIX LOW GROW MIX NONE LOW GROW MI)•. AS APPROVED BY SEE NOTE #5 SEE NOTE #5 DISTRICT OR CITY MAX. SLOPE 3:1 3:1 I FLAT BOTTOM I 4:1 4:1 NA • OR AS APPROVED NOTES: 1. REFER TO APPENDIX A, CWS DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING TREE PLACEMENT. TOPSOIL AND PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PROVIDE IRRIGATION AS APPROVED BY CWS. 3. JUTE MATTING- GEOJUTE PLUS IN TREATMENT AREA, ECONOJUTE FOR ALL OTHER AREAS, OR SIMILIAR FABRICS. COCONUT FIBER IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE. 4. 12-INCHES OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED THROUGHOUT THE WATER QUALITY TRACT. 5. FREEBOARD AREA SEED MIX, DWARF TALL FESCUE 40%, DWARF PERENIAL RYE 30%, CREEPING RED FESCUE 25%, COLONIAL BENT GRASS 5%. APPLY AT A RATE OF 120# / ACRE. E9LIDSWALE A N.T.S. FIGURE 2 GENERAL NOTES 1)STORMFILTER SY CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS; PORTLAND, OR(800) 548-4667; SCARBOROUGH. ME(877) 907-8676; ELKR CGE• MD (86G)740-33.8. 2) FILTERS TO BE SIPHON-ACTUATED AND SELF-CLEANING. 3)STEEL STRUCTURE TO 8E MANUFACTURED OF ./4 INCH STEEL PLATE. 4)STORMFILTER REQUIRES 2.3 I~ttl OF DROP FROM RIM TO OUTLET. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTLET. INLET(IF APPLICABLE)AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 5) CBSF EQUIPPED WITH 4 INCH (APPROXIMATE) LONG STUBS FOR INLET(IF APPLICABLE)AND OUTLET PIPING. STANDARD OUTLET STUB 15 8 INCHES IN DIAMETER. MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB'S 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING CAN BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPLING BY CONTRACTOR. 6) FOR H-20 LOAD RATING, CONCRETE COLLAR IS REQUIRED. CONCRETE COLLAR WITH QUANTITY(2)#4 REINFORCING BARS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 7)ALL 5TORMFILTER5 REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMATION. I -CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN I STORM FILTER DATA STRUCTURE ID CB1 , CB2 WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE (cfs) 0.03 , 0.03 PEAK FLOW RATE(<I cfs) 0.24 0.31 RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW(yr s) 25—YR 25—YR CARTRDGE FLOW RATE(I 5 OR 7.5 clpm) 15 15 MEDIA TYPE (CSF, PERLITE, ZPG) CSF CSF BRIM ELEVATION 161.3± 163.1± PIPE DATA: :.E. INLET STU5 XXX.XX' N/A N/A OUT_ET STUB )0(X.MX' 155.8 (6") 160.6 (6") NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONFIGURATION VERIFY EX. STORM PIPE CONNECTIONS AT OUTLET OUTLET EX. CATCH BASINS. .0 INLET - MINLET SLOPED LID NO SOLID COVER NO NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INLET GRATE ACCESS COVER•a . ' ' • a • 4 .. • . q. i•-• ' • . • . i' 4 . • . . b DDDDDDDDDDD a -.. _ 2-4'... �'•: .' DD I I D "♦*♦♦♦�•" ••• ., INSIDE RIM• - • I , • + d . - _ a: a a •' 2'-4' 2'-4' INSIDE RIM INSIDE RIM THE STORMwATER MANAGEMENT 3 _ 4'-8 3/4" 5t.orm.°rlter® Ca. � OUTSIDE RIM U.5.PAIT:NT N .5,322,629, L/ No. 5,707,527,Igo.6,027,E39 / 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - TOP VIEW I 1 No.G.G49,046,No.5,624,576, 3 AND OTHER U.S.AND rO EIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS FENDING STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING STORMINATER TOP VIEW, NOTES AND DATA 3 SOLUTIONS STANDARD DETAIL - 1 CARTRIDGE UNIT contechatcrmwater.com DATE:11101f06 SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME:CBSFIS-OTL I DRAWN:MJW I CHECKED:ARG GROUP MACKENZIE APPENDIX A STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT CALCULATIONS H:\Projects\213007900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 4 \// ,a+r. ∎n+N e'M u-o'.cp u.o WO u10*+mo \\// YAr r.-1 O YU'Z.1 mac rw a mnc _ " .%/l --�_:_,�_�tenet w e -o• /J—_ ' .re.: i r r vivo. '�ti 1 ■ l:) al I �/%I•v;'2//:9,,''>;%// //////� r 'j;i-:/., cif M: , i i �° ill — ` rte` // �/ -0 1 ;1?, . / �s r �• pp 1 �, <<t WIR r , I EXISTING \\!:1 . 'R \ •� /' BUILDING uoAswOS`DUr II NI 4 40.000 SF ° II r f / .. 1 II \ -- ,.,j ! ; 1{ ' 2, 11 1{ TfiJpcDOCK "�. '\I I 1 RI DOCK rou r � sr tl �,/� -i. /', r-if/// ti, Vii;,. i,,,,,,,liffai,* 46/ !, ,....7-177, \ N..,,,,,. N 1. / `\ ''r— 81N TECH CENTER DIVE `` — / /\ / Water Minimum Design Drainage Quality Size Facility Facility Impervious Area Flow(cfs) Required Size Basin A New Paving 3,800 0.01 228 sf LIDA Swale Existing Paving 8,380 0.02 503 sf LIDA Swale Sizing Total 12,180 0.03 731 sf 1,100 sf Factor: 0.06 Basin B Truck Dock Paving 2,540 0.01 Catch Basin 1 Existing Paving 9,860 0.02 Cartridge WQ Rate: Total 12,400 0.03 0.78 1 cartridge 15 gpm Basin C ADA Parking 1,740 0.004 Catch Basin 2 Existing Paving 13,960 0.03 Cartridge WQ Rate: Total 15,700 0.03 0.99 1 cartridge 15 gpm Total Existing Impervious Area: 117,640 sf Treatment Provided for Existing Area: 32,200 sf (27%) GROUP_ LaCie Tenant Improvement Stormwater Treatment Summary ' IAA C K E N Z I E Project No. 2130079.00 BY: BDN DATE: 4/8/2013 GRQLLP MACKENZIEl APPENDIX B STORMWATER RUNOFF DETENTION CALCULATIONS H:\Projects\213007900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 5 TR55 Tc Workshee, Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Hyd. No. 3 Basin A- Pre-Development Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 200.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.40 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 0.50 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 49.95 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 49.95 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Paved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc 50.00 min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 3 Basin A- Pre-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.010 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 508 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 259 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 50.00 min Total precip. = 2.40 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Pre-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 --2 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk,Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 3 Basin A- Pre-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.023 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 506 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 492 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 50.00 min Total precip. = 3.40 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Pre-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 . 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min; Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc. v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3, 2013 Hyd. No. 3 Basin A- Pre-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.028 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 506 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 593 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 80 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of conc. (Tc) = 50.00 min Total precip. = 3.80 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Pre-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 - 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 • - 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 3 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 4 Basin A- Post-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.046 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 470 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 643 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.40 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Post-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 --2 Year 0 (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 - 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 - - - 0.01 0.00 -- - - 1 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 4 Time (min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 4 Basin A- Post-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.066 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 470 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 938 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 3.40 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Post-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 - 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 — — 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk,Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 4 • Basin A- Post-Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.074 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 470 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 1,056 cuft Drainage area = 0.087 ac Curve number = 98 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 5.00 min Total precip. = 3.80 in Distribution = Type IA Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Basin A - Post-Development Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 --25 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 - - 0.01 0.00 - - -----------L_- 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 4 Time (min Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk,Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 5 LIDA Swale Detention Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 488 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Basin A- Post-Development Max. Elevation = 168.97 ft Reservoir name = LIDA Swale Max. Storage = 144 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. LIDA Swale Detention 0 (cfs) Hyd. No. 5--2 Year 0 (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 Time (min) Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 4 EMU_ storage used = 144 cuft Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk,Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3.2013 Hyd. No. 5 LIDA Swale Detention Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 468 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Basin A- Post-Development Max. Elevation = 169.12 ft Reservoir name = LIDA Swale Max. Storage = 240 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. LIDA Swale Detention Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5-- 10 Year Q (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 ( - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time (min Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 4 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' Total storage used = 240 cuft Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Hyd. No. 5 LIDA Swale Detention Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 476 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 4 - Basin A- Post-Development Max. Elevation = 169.18 ft Reservoir name = LIDA Swale Max. Storage = 281 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. LIDA Swale Detention Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 5 -- 25 Year 0 (cfs) 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 • 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 - 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 1680 Time (min) Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 4 Total storage used = 281 cuft Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD®Civil 3D®2009 by Autodesk, Inc.v6.066 Wednesday,Apr 3,2013 Pond No. 1 - LIDA Swale Pond Data Contours-User-defined contour areas.Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation= 168.40 ft Stage/ Storage Table Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuft) 0.00 168.40 00 0 0 0.20 168.60 159 11 11 0.40 168.80 400 54 65 0.60 169.00 570 96 161 0.80 169.20 742 131 292 1.00 169.40 916 165 457 Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrfRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No.Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = --- --- --- --- Length(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 1.000(by Contour) Multi-Stage = n/a No No No TW Elev.(ft) = 0.00 Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet(ic)and outlet(oc)control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions(lc)and submergence(s) Stage(ft) Stage/ Discharge Elev(ft) 2.00 170.40 1.80 170.20 1.60 170.00 1.40 169.80 1.20 169.60 1.00 169.40 0.80 169.20 0.60 169.00 0.40 - 168.80 0.20 168.60 0.00 168.40 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.021 0.024 0.027 0.030 Discharge(cfs) Total Q GROUP MACKENZIE APPENDIX C OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING Some of the on-site sub-basins use a gravity flow underground pipe system to convey site runoff. The pipe routes flow from catch basins to water quality treatment facilities, and from the facilities to the public storm system located in SW Tech Center Dr. WATER QUALITY FACILITY — SWALE The onsite Low-Impact Development Approach (LIDA) swale located along the west edge of the site is designed to filter and clean the storm water runoff, while allowing runoff to infiltrate into the underlying native soils. The swale is designed to collect water during smaller storm events, to allow pollutants to settle and filter out as water percolates through vegetation, growing medium, and gravel. The swale is planted with an assortment of special plants to help treat the stormwater. The swale has an overflow grated inlet set approximately 12 inches above the bottom of the facility to capture runoff from larger storms and route flows to the piped conveyance system. WATER QUALITY FACILITY — IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS The plants installed in the swale require irrigation for the first two years of operation to ensure proper establishment of the plants. The irrigation system shall be inspected to ensure proper functioning. The spray coverage of the irrigation water shall be enough to ensure every plant has adequate watering. Each rotor head shall be inspected to ensure proper functioning. WATER QUALITY FACILITY — INSPECTION All water quality facilities shall be inspected as follows: • Quarterly for the first 2 years • Twice a year thereafter • Within 48 hours of major rainfall events (more than 1 inch of rain over a 24- hour period) • Refer to the attached maintenance requirements for the Stormfilter treatment cartridges and catch basins. H:\Projects\213007900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 6 GROUP MACKENZIE SWALES What To Look For What To Do Structural components, including inlets and outlets/overflows, shall freely convey storm water. +Clogged inlets/outlets +Remove sediment and debris from catch basins and pipes to maintain at least 50% conveyance capacity at all times. +Liner and foundation +Repair/seal crack. Replace when repair is +Cracked drain pipes insufficient. Vegetation shall cover 90% of the facility +Tall or overgrown vegetation +Prune to allow sight lines +Weeds, trash, and debris +Remove weeds, trash, and other debris that accumulate on the bottom of the planter +Dead or strained vegetation +Replant per original planter plan or substitute from SWMM Appendix F.4 plant list. Irrigate as needed. Mulch annually. Do not apply fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides. Maintenance Schedule: Summer: Make any structural repairs. Improve filter medium as needed. Clear outlet catch basin and/or outlet pipe as needed. Irrigate as needed. Fall: Replant exposed soil and replace dead plants. Remove sediment, trash and plant debris. Winter: Monitor flow-through rates. Clear inlet and outlets/overflows to maintain conveyance. Spring: Remove sediment, plant debris, and trash. Replant exposed soil and replace dead plants. Mulch. All Seasons: Weed as necessary. Maintenance Records: Record date, description, and contractor (if applicable) for all structural repairs, landscape maintenance, and facility cleanout activities. Keep work orders and invoices on file and make available upon request of the City inspector. Access: Maintain ingress/egress to design standards. Pollution Prevention: All sites shall implement best management practices to prevent hazardous or solid wastes or excessive oil and sediment from contaminating storm water. Contact Spill Prevention & Citizen Response at 503.823.7180 for immediate assistance responding to spills. Record time/date, weather, and site conditions if site activities contaminate storm water. Vectors: Storm water facilities shall not harbor mosquito larvae or rats that pose a threat to public health or that undermine the facility structure. Monitor standing water for small wiggling sticks perpendicular to the water's surface. Note holes/burrows in and around facilities. Record time/date, weather, and site conditions when vector activity is observed. H:\Projects\2 1 300 7900\CALCS\STORM\Storm Report 040813.docx 7 { _ GROUP ' MACKENZIE , r II NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING April 4, 2013 Re: LaCie Dear Interested Party: Group Mackenzie is representing the owner of the property located at 7555 SW Tech Center N {n 0` o m Drive. We are considering proposing a site development review for some exterior and M interior modifications to the existing site and building at this location. O O in c. X Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals,we would like to - N q g a E j discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents.You m- p o j are invited to attend a meeting on April 22, 2013 at: N u E Tigard Chamber of Commerce 12345 SW Main Street • o Tigard,OR 7:30 PM tt,' X ,0 o • °° Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans o a may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call(503) 224-9560 if you have any questions. d m > r Sincerely, Group - - ------- Mackenzie. Incorporated 'yan Schera Architecture Land Use Planner Interiors Structura: Enclosure: Vicinity Map Engineering Civil Engineering Land Use Ptannino Transportation Planning Landscape Architecture fj Locations: Portland,Oregon Seattle,Washington Vancouver,Washington H:'Projects V 13007900\WP\LTR`.130404-Notice of Neighborhood Mtg.doc noti tic 41359_8d33673cbfc948afaOd f3717ed696bda.pdf http://tiggissvr/arcgisoutput/fliResMaps/notifc_41359_8d33673cbfc948afa0df3717ed696bd. "4„, imensw ,1114\__________) fil • I Ir. 11 nil Area Notified (500 Ft) / /7 111**sit,* LL1'‘,, , // 4+, ` ue ro f�.la-kenzte �. G I " / I ,• R.:an Saler9 r• '7555 s',,,":Tech Center Dr 7/Limeal \ y, Fenno, \ '„m �,ilk\s� y, Creek 1 \ 1 I M q Park '� h, l Z i g a'„,,,,i..... Ea\\� r. , it III '. ,% illi la W■I1a. IIJIiULgym rrlyvrA•a•rL 1 iii. ..t.o....ma _ - _- ••••••. 1 1 ••••••• ••••••♦ LA lam l •,•••••• 1111111111k I=,Limon ,•.,nom rh&nam.n is.....al d: rc; ;rnonms from?�e c!a<e nrxed r.1__,\ il, , 0 es ' Illon ) I I,t .TA..:r. ■ defm '1�II�n�ii �.,� 7pq� \ \.�UId�I�\:k:ra•.� 1 LIJCPnntac`:-;.1.3,-i:. -4.11~6 . a — =MK Mtn �•t.�r.�ra, 111 �aTi...,, r� i \ I 1112 ; 1 0, .t ,,. . \ �� '1`� I I .ali'J� a' ” • 11Ilr 1111 Ili/ T e I i\to � . -1.1 a "� � . MIA ...2..i'151-...1111Brg.,..Ji I ' '1 gamma' 1 Ilinin , : i :0 ,:f ni.30 III �. r ..Qat) T. t i \ IJJ aH4.liJ,.2-L•fi.Z/ rrrr mo qt� [Y I 1 of 2 3/25/2013 4:49 PN i 1111 III TIGARD Neighborhood Meeting Information The City of Tigard requires developers to hold a neighborhood meeting to notify affected property owners about their proposed development. This is done as part of the development review process for most land use applications. Below are some frequently asked questions about the neighborhood meeting process. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? After the neighborhood meeting, the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the city. Sometimes it takes awhile before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the city, staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. WHAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY SUBMITTED? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is significantly different, a new neighborhood meeting would be required as determined by staff. HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code (also known as the Community Development Code). Review the ciy's development code to familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard Public Library, on the city's web site at www.tigard-or.gov, or a copy may be purchased by contacting our records department www.tigard-or.gov/city_hall/services/public_records/. You may also contact city planning staff by calling 503.718.2421 and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared, however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you know what they are. If a development meets the code standards,it can proceed. For your assistance, attached is a list of questions that may assist you in determining your position on a particular proposal. I:\CURPI.N\Masters\Pre-Application Conference Packet\Neighborhood Meeting lnformation_Questions.doc Updated 3/25/2013 - Typical Questions to Help Ensure Common TIGARD Neighborhood Concerns are Considered The following is a list of questions intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests PROCESS ► What applications are you (the developer) applying for? When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? ► Will the decision on the application be made by city staff,Tigard Hearings Officer, Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing) ► At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? ► Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard staff? • Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? • What city planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS Will there be a traffic study done? What is the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? ► What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to existing streets are proposed? ► Are streets proposed to be public or private? What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? / What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSITY What is the current zoning? What uses are allowed under this zoning? ► Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to what zone? ► How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum number of units allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY What is your erosion control and drainage plan? What is the natural slope of the property? What are the grading plans? ► Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING ► What is the urban forestry plan and how will the applicable development requirements be met? ► What are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION How do I request more information or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant? I:\CURPI.N\masters\Pre-Application Conference Packet\Neighborhood Meeting Information_Questions.doc Updated 3/25/21)13 AFF, _WIT OF MAILING/P -J TING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: ` n I, -6:xt �C.X`.7 &VQsG. C1I.�10-'l�Cs,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 4"1 day of t11? 20 13 ,I caused to have mailed to tch of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 1S "1.� 70_ 1._ coMe.� �%VQ_ ,1iCtid, 0 , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly_ addre sed to said pers s an were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at \�2� t) 14N AU .1Y\UQ_I Ycrkk 'of... , with postage prepaid thereon. ...L, /� Signa re (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, e incic�'a Lies0. OI,VQ ? , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for he land loca ed at (state the approximate location(s) IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) '4'51'6`,if)1 ,i , Ct\QA. kZ S UQ, 1T1�cti� OR ,and did on the 14 day of pQe.\ ,201�,Lpersonally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 7 PL. n AA k ' \CLPZ t10,3 1RE.V%4.0 land use application,and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at OA. Sf OY\tC... c 6 .mil'QLL Q e,y QA ' . Q NI— CSC Qi.CI� Q/Akfc_rl.a. 1 Q,' LL\ . l (State the location you posted notice on property) - _di, . / I' Signature (In the presence of a Notary Pu s c - (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)• STATE OF Ox-¢ ) County of Au--.L w1- )ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ZA day of 51417 f ` ,20 13 . OFFICIAL SEAL -c�L / � �' REBECCA LYNN BRANDY (20/ mil',,.- 2 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �:>� COMMISSION NO.469805 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION DPIRES JULY 08,2016 My Commission Expires: 0 7/OVZ0/0 L\C:URPLN\Masters\Pre-Application Conference Packet\Affidavit of Mailing-Posting Neighborhood Meeting.docx Updated 3/25/2013 GRQUP _ MACKENZIE NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING April 4,2013 Re: LaCie Dear Interested Party: Group Mackenzie is representing the owner of the property located at 7555 SW Tech Center o m Drive. We are considering proposing a site development review for some exterior and interior modifications to the existing site and building at this location. • 6• P ii Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals,we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents.You 0. d o 0 are invited to attend a meeting on April 22,2013 at: LA V CL Tigard Chamber of Commerce a• 0 03 12345 SW Main Street o ; Tigard,OR To ; 7:30 PM y x "' - Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans Zit o may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. ci M i We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you.Please call(503) 224-9560 if you have any questions. F- Sincerely, Group Mackenzie, Incorporated yan Schera Architecture Land Use Planner Interiors Structural Enclosure: Vicinity Map Engineering Civil Engineering land Use Planning Transportation Planning Landscape Architecture Locations: Portland,Oregon Seattle,Washington Vancouver,Washington H:\Projects\2130079001WP\LTR\130404-Notice of Neighborhood Mtg.doc .a...,,_ . ,,-. ..._,g•,,C......,4A T°U.C.`'i/_,.-9b-.._p- - p_/ - gig 'ai -Poi t/f s1 VI is 35 d 731 94 a0 71 69 I._ _ _. _ _ _.7 ..1 ,_,....... 7 I v . . .._______ iiiim„..,�r al, A = Area Notified (500 Ft) �:..,,, Lts\ fi r; , 5�i 4( .•3, NoN__ Cl/o.:1.)Macke-z,e N1111 _ I \ -. Ry.ar Scle-a ./ WNW\N 7555 SW a:' Oe ie•C' . , EN immorml 4 1,,,N,\ All Panne', .1 � 4 • Rar� ,i Cre.k • m iiiti% Pork w 1.16511 7. Ell igi\ NI MIll pi\.-.16-•Imi i t .�ME \ 4-4, ,..guru."`1 Nor C ••••••• P"pF-',C:':7r:'Iri':lnairn.5',aid _ A��.�■��� r�•;:nrnrns+-nr�t re da;c Can;:-rJ cn iik �r :rns rn2� Mob, 1 111111011 01 il I klIg I I Ps,. _ ,A Pi ....- --'''''T" ...,01111. IMIA 14119r- - 01 'a3iwt --. 1"..\\ '', 0.1.461.T.1/.11:4:Ose tii11r,,it, MN ..., .111•I • dal .. -- 1 I 1 111111 _. _ - _____- _�C,x.'•.::40 G 1.1I1ifl� --'.i fiifp-,Cc c_; 'IE'.� .c -_ _ .i : ‘ 1I ,�•• N INN�r i ----.-•• '.: '+> la• IGARD pS ,''z�s R a., t miimi 1 Of 2 s;.tcr,> .T„ ,, • z/ici nII 1 A•46 v* • ■ TIGARD Neighborhood Meeting Information The City of Tigard requires developers to hold a neighborhood meeting to notify affected property owners about their proposed development. This is done as part of the development review process for most land use applications. Below are some frequently asked questions about the neighborhood meeting process. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? After the neighborhood meeting, the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the city. Sometimes it takes awhile before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the city, staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted. They will be provided an opportunity to comment. Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. WHAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY SUBMITTED? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is significantly different, a new neighborhood meeting would be required as determined by staff. HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code (also known as the Community Development Code). Review the city's development code to familiaritieyourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard Public Library, on the city's web site at www.tigard-or.gov, or a copy may be purchased by contacting our records department www.tigard-or.gov/eity_hall/services/public_records/. You may also contact city planning staff by calling 503.718.2421 and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared,however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you know what they are. If a development meets the code standards,it can proceed. For your assistance, attached is a list of questions that may assist you in determining your position on a particular proposal. I:\CURPLN\Masters\Pro-Application Conference Packet\Neighborhood Meeting lnformanem_Qucstions.doc Updated 3/25/2013 UPI Q Typical Questions to Help Ensure Common T I G A R D Neighborhood Concerns are Considered , The following is a list of questions intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests PROCESS ► What applications are you (the developer) applying for? When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? ► Will the decision on the application be made by city staff,Tigard Hearings Officer, Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing) ► At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? / Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard staff? • Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? • What city planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS ■ Will there be a traffic study done? What is the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? ► What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to existing streets are proposed? ► Are streets proposed to be public or private? What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? ► What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSITY ► What is the current zoning? What uses are allowed under this zoning? ■ Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to what zone? b How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum number of units allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY What is your erosion control and drainage plan? What is the natural slope of the property? What are the grading plans? Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING ▪ What is the urban forestry plan and how will the applicable development requirements be met? What are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? ,DDITIONAL INFORMATION ` How do I request more information or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant? kCURPI,N\Masters\Pre-App licanon Conference Packer\Neighborhood Meeting lnformation_Questions.doc Updated 3/25/2013 Sign-In Sheet LaCie Remodel Project — Neighborhood Meeting 4/22/13 @ 7:30pm Name Organization Address Phone Email Q rCiick.I — 7.55S CI�n�t r 6 3rt-7 62 - _- 'I 1 ,4 ERA1¢NJ5p� 7.5-36 6 ,c L52,3)(39'l0�'�5 SCa+4 McCormack lnG(arin*ck 40. 1 l9 D .'SLJ Sc+„,Jjun Soy -6,z1t-y6y'i Sa›'tt€mcca«+ACKpa & 3111 01-041+ 7 5 5 S141eitern� ! - G 077162. G R Q_UT_ MACKENZIE ' PORTLAND,OR I SEATTLE,WA I VANCOUVER,WA ME E T N G MINUTES RiverEast Center 11515 Water Avenue,Suite 1001 Portland,OR 97214 PO.Box 14310 1 Portland,OR 97293 T:503.224.9560 I F:503.228.1285 I www.groupmackenzie.com PROJECT NUMBER: 2130079.00 ISSUE DATE: April 26, 2013 PROJECT NAME: LaCie—Major Modification RECORDED BY: Ryan Schera—Group Mackenzie TO: FILE PRESENT: Ryan Schera,Erica Jankowski—Group Mackenzie Yoshio Kurosaki—Summit Properties, Inc. Melissa Cahill—LaCie Neighbors—See Attached Sign-in Sheet SUBJECT: Neighborhood Meeting(April 22,2013) 1. Presentation by applicant's representative. 2. Question regarding whether materials containing strong odor or uses with loud continuous noises would be proposed. -Answer: No 3. Question regarding removal of existing ivy along north property line. -Answer: No 4. Question regarding uses adjacent to the north property line. -Answer: Parking and trash compaction and pick-up once a week. Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. C6,1 e Jot 1.1)ei NC 0L9e 12L 409 .- YY�N••a VN r•iru:vn gnyoY it �� �•1L1'+ .+Le•y Ll I + a{.-:ae.n cc+l ew�w mAa.ovy I �I ‘911 � H I � r +' �a...l..l..1.4 a�..+� 1•r.l,naa �� � ee � n t „e SI ccyy 13IZN3 )(JVIN r IA li i.i 111 III.:+ g 1! dnoas `,d F v_ 1 Ai ---iii, 1 ,�! i 1 5 'i 5i tlg 3 14,E1,4„...; ,,,i 1 I IN N F ` bI ;$ M a t S ' ! L 1 ii ! 1 il 1 ii4" 0 gl i g !/ i ii i li g il li 1 11 11 il il 414 ; 5: b q i N ii a . a a IO it a t i I 0 o r 11 i it lq, ii a r_ t - \. . , . ,.\\ "---2 . I -_sic !__ ` �. ilk\1 — ``` c (RC . \ Y r I L ` � � �' i ii,„, . , : t �R 4i , :•,� vasr 07077:30 ry� �N R *rl - _ } -��,-rte �rC,. n � �'.. J 1 0 g O J /1/ /, / PR,E - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ` _ (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6)Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: STAFF AT PRE-APP.: NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: ( p Ma(,1 u.? AGENT: Phone: Phone: .f ) - PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 1S55 SVV -real 62..I e42— Da- TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): ?S I 0 I DC-C4SDD NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: CID Q- PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: /4Vy.( &Lic m l' ► - •-VAS ti) Gt(LC YYLpo(,ct, LA k+ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ;w' 1 ^L n MAP DESIGNATION: �JyLGI-Y ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: ft. Max. building height: ft. Setbacks: Front: ft(Max. 10 ft). Side: ft. Rear: ft. Corner: ft. from street. MAXIMUM SI I E COVERAGE:%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:%. -g NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, IN 1'ERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. 1Z NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the condusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. g ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accessed Minimum access width:ft. t.,1 Minimum pavement width: 24 I All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas:ft. Ni WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) > STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. g SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/z)of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district gi BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745&18.620) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: 3 tl/a feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. • feet along south boundary. 11/a feet along west boundary. n IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:tibtk Npieh p 1)rt CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS-18.745.050E Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition,screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745, 18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. • RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a dear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. • PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: j LD j ' j C� Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 000 62 It CQ S SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):. NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALL$shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. .lam LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 1 BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use:_ ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPIffiNT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries,is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. Egi CLEAN WATER SERVICES(CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <250; I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25°4, 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 ;Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. $Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. f' SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. E URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III); Site Development Review(Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover require % (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees with mature canopy cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section g PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area. Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ►i CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the dear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures Impact Study) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: PRO ( �URE ►=� Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. PA Public hearing before the Planning Commission. • Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One. 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE IN"1'ENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718- EMAIL: @tigard-or.gov TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Note to File: SDR2013-00003 1. Applicant did not need to plant additional street trees as stated in the decision and shown on Sheet L2.2. The site has sufficient existing trees to meet street tree requirements as shown on L2.1, dated 9/30/2013. 2. Sheet L2.0 is outdated. I ` - - - - GRADING NOTES $8830'24"E 3'i ° °' c a __ . rf-• f1E RETMOC W! 1. ROUGH GRADING- BRING ALL FINISH GRADES TO APPROXIMATE LEVELS INDICATED. WHERE o m e m ' /CYQpE fpm.+ �C1 OTHERWISE INDICATED,FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE THE SAME AS AWACENT SIDEWALKS. •o a I _ iYa raAC HE'D SIRE ON rDP CURBS. OR THE OBVIOUS GRADE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURE. GRADE TO UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES • EX ,�� -,_ BETWEEN POINTS WHERE GRADES ARE GIVEN. ROUND OFF SURFACES. AVOID ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVELS. 0 e e o _ ROUGH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR DEPTH OF CONCRETE SLABS, WALKS,AND THEIR BASE COURSES. GRADE FOR ..o D W a, I i►a,^_•a .r.� PAVED DRIVES AND PAVED PARKING AREAS AS INDICATED AND SPECIFIED HEREIN, AND PROVIDE FOR - I ASP,tAL 1 `� SURFACE DRAINAGE AS SHOWN, ALLOWING FOR THICKNESS OF SURFACING MATERIAL S GRAD NC: 0 o°c ' ( y M • �,iY� I �,��.� �..►- 1 AT COMPLETION OF JOB AND AFTER BACKFILUNG BY OTHER CRAFTS HAS BEEN COMP TED, REFILL AND Q i►,ri-, ,. COMPACT AREAS WHICH HAVE SETTLED OR ERODED TO BRING TO FINAL GRADES.GRADING TOLERANCES: • !�iRFal �'' I i ROUGH GRADE AT PAVED OR LANDSCAPED AREAS: ±0.1 FT. <° •' I {� _ • , FINISH GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING FINAL SURFACING: ±0.03 FT. ;n �i I A • •a EX •' �' 14.4-17 ' 2. FXCAYAUQN: EXCAVATE FOR SLABS, PAVING,AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO SIZES AND LEVELS • • I TNRS 11w417 SHOWN OR REQUIRED. ALLOW FOR FORM CLEARANCE AND FOR PROPER COMPACTION CF REQUIRED BACKFILLING !' ii,.iri �� MATERIAL. XCAVATOR(5 MUST COMPLY WITH O.R.S. 757.541 THROUGH 757.571; e °o }1 V A�• a 7 (. EXCAVATOR Si SHA NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LINE LOCATIONS °°9 c o 1 .I N -- .YARN':'I 72 HOURS(MINIMUM)PRIOR TO START OF WORK. DAMAGE TO c c« a o (, f %%4" //�-Ir �� j/ •1.4 UTIUTIES SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ` m o Q °� t 1 \ �j 3. EFFECTIVE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS REWIRED. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST �� °c a c iY„i,cy BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED MEETING THE CITY OF 71GARD AND CNS REQUIREMENTS THE GOVERNING c o c I w JURISDICTION MAY, AT ANY TIME, ORDER CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH c o< o I I iYi1P}1, S EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL. MI c W A o o,b fYA*La BS 4. EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL IS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITHIN THE WORK SITE °Wow o°f ^' I /' MATCH EX. AC AND SHALL BE SO ROUTED THAT ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, PUBLIC PROPERTY.AND THE RECEIVING .. UI«n 0 C w NG GRAVEL LO -� I SYSTEM ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED. THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION MAY. AT ANY TIME ORDER 0 e o e a_ I -- CORRECTIVE ACTION AND STOPPAGE OF WORK TO ACCOMPLISH EFFECTIVE DRAINAGE CONTROL >.EE,e e S o fiIi)iFil C 5. SITE TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND USED FOR LANDSCAPING. w V NO I--I B.,O ey7 I WA 1 I 4 I 1 6. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASED ON A SURVEY BY Olin! ri , o I • NORTHWEST SURVEYING. INC.. AND IS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL 1e i • o EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH HIS OWN RESOURCES PRIOR TO START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. m I c, 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE GRADES AT ENTRANCE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. i wI TfV.11AC :: c„I ,i r I EXISTING BUILDING �, 3 B. 2%MAXIMUM SLOPE AT ALL ADA-COMPLIANT PARKING SPACES AND LOADING ZONES. I FF-171.99 g ,-� 9. 5X MAX SLOPE (EXCLUDING RAMPS)AT PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PUBLIC R.O.W. AND W fFi•7f11 T.• I I y BUIIDINC ENTRANCES.II�1F?•,e I _ � 10.WHERE SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3:1,CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUTE MATTING. SLOPE SHALL BE 11 IiYi 7 .I o PREPARED TO ENSURE COMPLETE AND DIRECT CONTACT OF MATTING WITH SOIL FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S _I , T,3'yr,YAC L 'n RECOMMENDATIONS o^ - yeir T.xYalTa � '% E w°c ,B ;�ili,Gra,AG �m UTILITY NOTES iYi,i!J AC - N j, wW �W 11CA14• 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF THE INTERNATIONAL CLEAN WATER SERVICES. �- I -- [P AC p� AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING ,` I _ MATCH EX. SEE DETAIL 2/C2.2 FOR CCOE. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBUC R.O.W. REQUIRES A PUBUC WORKS PERMIT. • t TICla TC ENLARGED GRADING PLAN 1 'Ti BMA -AC fI`S'IiM7 AC T 2. THE WORKING DRAWINGS ARE GENERALLY DIAGRAMMATIC. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY OFFSET BEND • �IRF7 AC I IL'F•(S,AC MA EL OR ELBOW REWIRED FOR INSTALLATION IN THE SPACE PROVIDED. THEY DO NOT SHOW EVERY 1 ATCH EX. ATCH EX. I[j� g]BOTTOM WALL I DIMENSION. COMPONENT PIECE,SECTION, JOINT OR FITTING REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. 11 iT1 ,T,• ,^7 AC ----- ' ALL LOCATIONS FOR WORK SHALL BE CHECKED AND COORDINATED WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS IN r IF !II TOP WALL "ii THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DYING WITHIN I f[�]E:79 , itliK1,.EX....,P T. WN DOOR , S A9'HAtT THE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS TO CONDITION SIZE AND LOCATION BY Project \ . 8'OVERFLOW RISER SIR�1 _� �a 4.#v � ,�,� UNCOVERING,PROVIDINC SUCH IS PERMITTED BY LOCAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION, Lace'TENANT RIM ELEV.-169.25 1 /��.�.y BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF THERE ARE ANY )0011' y� I j, Mw bo&�i/�i� , DISCREPANCIES. IMPROVEMENT I 1 _ / ----v Bi�1. n " I 3. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN THE CURRENT UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CHAPTER 7, SECTIONS a•STORM LATERAL,CONNECT �G / +�_ 707 AND 719, AND CHAPTER 11,SECTION 1101.12. TO EXISTING 8"STUB •1„111-17 As ��IE�765.0± (VERIFY) 'I''R''� T��' �_� --j �� ' NOTE: NOT ALL REQUIRED CLEANOUTS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. � I I'L+, �g 54. , 4. ALL STORM PIPING IS SIZED FOR A MANNING'S"N'VALUE-0.013. ALL STORM PIPING IS 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR ii# N � 2.5X -fs. CQ! :NM:. r :A 13 I I DESIGNED USING CONCENTRIC PIPE TO PIPE AND WYE FITTINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. T10AW,OR _ fI►A•7 � --- ®P ® m®rt ® ' E 5. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR UTIUTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING AND TO 5'OUTSIDE THE c7 BUILDING. '� WWII TC IEI'R41 ND WALL ' ��_ 1E4.11 AC C7!QpE•a""'-.:a, u-n•�• HII,A a EX. AC _ °- � : � I 6. ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS TO BE 6"AT 2.0%MIN.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7�/ EX I I 7. VERIFY LOCATION,SIZE AND DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITIES BY POTHOUNG PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IOU, l��. ____ if.l'x.TT AC ITi!iF9 A S NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. * �1 ///, / i(..1.• N, A6PNAL7 "(." DL INSTAL y T - +i B. THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN AS A BACKGROUND SCREEN ON THIS SHEET IS BASED ON A SURVEY r:• >. a+E w FILTER CB2 SEE OCT DET 1 1/C8.2 I PREPARED BY NORTHWEST SURVEYING,INC.,DATED 2/12/2013. �� ♦•�, -63.1± - i(•TTCH AC �, y :'/ �,� 7 �. , VE- n TCH EX. 9. EXISTING ON-SITE UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON AS-BUILT DRAWINGS PREPARED 7T\\\ri• `~• '.t .•a d BY VAN DNG UTILITIES ENGA AND ASSOCIATES,DATED 4/27/1982. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION T/a'f 0J /// y 1' y �L • ,I OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. W W. ■ST -- �Y I 10. SEE BUILDING PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR PIPING WITHIN THE BUILDING AND UP TO 5'OUTSIDE THE (EXPIRES 12/31/13� / - /// _ as 64(MHO O - - ar BUILDING, INCLUDING ANY FOUNDATION DRAINAGE PIPING. � . �► - ( ss903'00•W 11. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM 3 FT OF COVER OVER ALL WATER LINE. © RRIMt*GERME1E o _._- //%/ i1.�:1I-.7 REMOVE' EX.STEEL CAT B a'-�•'� ,r 7./,/,//, // MA INSTALL NEW FILTER 1 .6 ,,fi.��®� --- THESE NeCKENZ■E AND ARPROPERTY T TO BE ' /////// SEE DETAIL 1/CB.2 .__ST -tk4Y' USED OR REPRODUCED IN AN"MANNER. r RIM-161.3± ST I ST ---0 WITHOUT PRIOR wRr*eN PERMISSION '= / 58.3$„(VERIFY) R=141.55'HAM EX L CONNECT TO EX PIPES- _ _ _ REVISIONS: I PROT LI 121 - H I I0.R MIN, SW H _:: p L-� , / //// I DAN TA CLOSING BOLLARDS BEHIND CU �+oW 1 Qi �Q '� [] , --, �Ell S -, YVx••7 M'r U V OR " ( 1 IN PROGRESS■/ ®GRADING AND UTILffY PLAN ST �'�Il ��� SCALE: ,. 30' I .* / / , ,o D 5 }D 60 ZD i TFR 1 AN �� I L 171.97 ANDING i1 ".p fYil<Eil 5 / IN FEET RY7 BS 1 Inch= ao tc MATCH EX. 5 EQ. RISER SR M_•�X RAMP i. - iii•1(Fa AC ,;i,i•.7 AC LANDING r , LEGEND Tlxlrn, 171 S. SHEET TITLE: 4'� GRADING AND EXISTING 1117/131r-11`:-2" 1 n ���/61N CONCRETE CURB MATiCHa EX I -4114111'-' 49-.........1\.j ._...:'�V•., MAT.AC I MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB ■ „II- i[-fFA1• =_ � iLi•Rb FENCE --.- v � ® _- },:•: EDGE OF GRAVEL � P� ��4if�-- ���, LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 1. _ _ Itii Zl ACi �� �\/ �� iI1: ETC <� j I ® �,,, DRAWN BY:MH K �� Its 1[3:1G iAC l LL7.F.,i I.N(. n D n r I CHECKED BY. NCNB PAVING DUTY ASPHALT 1� i,'m•7 r® d'16,a 1 . ' "err: MA H .\ I A\`-",• h,,,,`I-;-y EX -,>a l�_• •; E%. WA �. . EX. /'/� /'/� • CONCRETE PAVING . '_-_- - _!- iPl{y"�^'�'^ (`�/ _--_ CI�.L CATCH BASIN _ J.._(41 LUMINAIRE ©GRADING ENLARGEMENT- ENTRY SIDEWALK SCALE: 1"• 10' - - , © >25%SLOPE AREA JOB N0. MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 • T/-RA 1'RADIUS 6'UNLESS OTHERWISE v •L o 1 4 S NOTED ON PLANS , N c c 3 m C �IL1� ' •• PAVING SECTION • o m �i I REMAIN m m a !v II SAW CUT EXISTING A.C. r o •^r 7., '///'//i NOTF NEW PAVING �� PAVING AS SHOWN ON PLANS. m o ym n y, ,•. cwi EXISTING AC TO REMAIN 2-CI IO CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 a PSI AT 28 DAYS. 6 SACK 1' SEE PLANS 1' E%ISTINC ROCK BASE •¢ c U . R• ., .,,,,,, MIX, SLUMP: 11/2'70 3' "`` I.'• �-• --,-r-.�*.il� TAPER CURB CONCRETE CURB i,��i� I'r DISTURB D BGRADE-DD NOT SLOPE PER ;m �N►:ISiiiIYi PROPOSED •.-•.o•.o•,, • I � GRADINGPLAN n .`� ROOK BASE COURSE +� ROCK BASE p p p0 .I�••U �• � 2)¢•LEVEL 2 WMAC(1 LIFT e to •i•-•-•_•. SEE PAVING SECTION •0Do0po D _ ;}}:Fjc•�:..,,�. ( ) _ } p p I I _ :;-:=;;•�:.:!..•:..:;.s:. 8' OF -0' CRUSHED °m CAST IN PLACE - PROPOSED 0Do0po Do00•:I �IL " "' =- "' ROCK SASE, COMPACT TO 95%OF o o °u° CONCRETE CURB •-h-- PAVING SECTION,SEE PLAN SUBGRADE °OQ°O�°O�°'I=II I MATCH EXISTING AC THICKNESS •11-U-If-11-11-11•-1f-11 MAX. DENSITY D1557 c o 1•p0Do00o0p TEVT OR NEW SECTION (WHICHEVER IS - - - ( ) e m _o-crop.. I'-Ell'.-Tn GREATER) SUBGRADE c° > 1 - = =III_ 11=11- LIGHT DUTY AC PAVEMENT �1 0 g a ®�° ®CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB a CONCRETE CURB BREAK Q SAWCUT DETAIL SLOPE PER - �� E-m o 0 ••: N.T.S. nr �•I �N.7.S. - 3®: N.T.S. GRADING PLAN 'F. c n o 6' id 4'LEVEL 2 MAC(2 LIFTS) w e o°m !n AC PAVING SECTION R-A• • ���r, g. ".'.!;: (10')j('-0 CRUSHED ROC(BASE to >; c .. PER AVING AND V �� . m .• . :'WLirt7w.G�i`u• N C"•'. COMPACT TO 95%OF MAX. DENSITY(D1557) ID V W I-J d b PER .�• ��� • BROOM FINISH _.nk�l0an:='7r 1C=':BFn=n, , �A CROSS ROPE - SUBGRADE //� e, TOOLED EDGE CAM SIDE Clint e =ti _ _ _� ��• ��, 11.E 11?1'�'i' .:� Ai' HEAVY DUTY AC PAVEMENT • 18' MHEEL BLOCKS _ �-�I_• i -�• �IE u •• YIN SEE ETA L ?, i -11 I„ 11L�'-1 1 1 T= 1 C GENERAL NOTES o 4$OPENING 1 9TORMr',LTER BY CONTECF STORMWATSL SOLVFON9;rcRTIAND,M NOD)540-471 5CAP•'OROUNI.ME(877) o ;o dmET STUB 907-0L7R eXRIDGE.MD(066)7403310. Cr O a °f Oa IIDIp 4b1 PISIMAIIMT P00. 21/40519 TO BE 91 ION-ACTUATEW MID SELEGLEIW NG. BNAlldl 3)STm STRUCTURE TO DE MANUPACTURED Or 4 INCH STEEL MTE O W p O' C' 41 90Op.4r LTER REWIRED 2.3 PITT 0 ° OP DROP PROM OM TO OUTLET.KR SHORD NOT BE LOWER RYA OUTLET.NUT or •O I 1 5 J4' ARUCAB.O AID OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPEWED BY ENGINEER NC PROVE M CONTRACTOR. .°.O N . •M i •" •I �!• 5)Ga7P ECKUIrPED WM 4 111Cn(APPR011MATq LONG STUDS REIN INLET - Rs .r - (( OF ARUCABIA MID OUTLET PIPING.STANDARD OUTLET - STUB'5 O INCHES IN DIAMETER MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB 15 15 HOLED N DIAMETER GC/BECTON TO COLLECTION PIPING `O C WER MI. ' %.� • :t �''1 VARIES ,�'� CAN BE AWE USING PIDIdE COUPLING BY CONfRP(,TOR Q E J 411'OR 11-20 LOAD RATING,CONCRETE COLLARS RECURRED.CONCRETE COLLAR WTN CRIAMTTY(2)M REINFORCING BARS TO ; T-3 5b'MAR 2'3 SID' DE PROVIDED eY CONTRACTOR <W '�•.. - �� ! .! _ _, '7)ALL STORAMRTW REQUIRE REGULAR MNNTDIANQ•REM TO OPERATOR AND MNIIIOM/C[GUg51N6 POR MORE E0 ter Le INFORMATION }1` I ,: \`:1.1 W 0 I-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN ° M5 O �\I , c o ` — r 0 • STORMFILTER DATA Ia5 N °o SCUM MIRE �\ �� 4 �RYr! INLET 571luJ (SEE N�OTSED 44 S) HATER IX:PIJTY PLOW RATE �[Z1 � � O m« >Ol FETE NO1B M 57 PEAR PLOW RATE is I cfa) O°d t �)N•. •• _ N • ■ CARTRIDGE ROW RATE(1 55 OR 7.5 O C •J' -1 .. . • •R . zo Irr z1a OUTLET PRE MEDIA TYPE(c5r,mot.aG) J �1 o w O o ¢n e •�•4( • �O�Sa T1(;DN,M UNIERCRAIN KIM ELEVATION 151.31 pY;: G �XO P REINFORCING DATES PIPE BATA .E. IV r G 1°2 ,N INLET STUD 4 `SEE NOTE 6) 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW B '"LET STUD « _ E 9° !N (OPTIONN7 O O - D ''.'.�". t! (1'Ii1ntli'rGit NOTE CONTRACTOR TO �«° 1 `i (5EE NOTP5 415) / VERIFY E%.STORY PIPE ° O O CONfIGURA10N £X CATCH AT .7 U W I-J B.CI OUTLET. gJT�'T EIL CATCH BASINS 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-PLAN VIEW O •, Client 1 INLET INLET utIING EYE SLOPED UO NO F trr GRA'r OPENING A E95 COVER ---- C Or 41 SOLID COVER 1R0 21/2' �_ G NOTES/SPECIAL.REGUNEMENT5, G, Erni� ,— - Is I W INrrow! ACC55 COVER I F ■ ^I CUTLET , CONCRETE LOUAR I I PERMANENT OM H07_5 445) I• s) (5EE NOR 6) 3'-9' I�\ POD!EINAnINI • •>a __ _1111llll1l1ltl Yer,� STCRRMnI.TEX 1'aR�1�• • !►•1•••••••••.1 ire RR CARTRC� `� ! i I I I I I I I I I I I I .........................'.' ' ' RaRIL• CAR'RGGC(M1 SUP OR- 9.4•••••••••••••••••110 .A.• B YRY•GUANO/1T ACQ90 (5EE NOTE 2; �w' r llH111111 n1wwNI_ aF '.••••iiii4M .°•R ft11111 G ••...1 UNOERDRAIN _1_ =1_1 MAMRXD •';r I 74'�` 2 N5D[ ms DC 1 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW O 4. 4'„J4' OUT510[ QTP WATER wvw c*r z K9ARN•>uuw¢ar 1'-0aM 24•.. 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN-SECTION VIEW OA x^+ © "'s'DE wA NSac RIM K,N aN ARR�w z o r Project r U.3 rAMf N•.AAYY.YY•J, Nene . U...MRMr».o 40117.9. IMPROVEMENT 1 w s.Tm.sRT.N..ban cMY w.TTOl3zT,No 40YT,r v •: lDCHB SI N'5101OA NI iY.VOSVO+ No 6440,0413,w.er14a" No.6.649.0.5.w.s.FR4.>c. 1 CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN•TOP VIEW O W..%a.o•W�w�acY.s>F. 021100 CINRECH SIern••••BRIV1bns WEIRS 1O w, _ OPBOB CONTEai Semester SdY1RM AND-AIMS MONO V CH STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER '"= Dzo90coNreaFeaRRR..BRNIIPn. 9 P�eMS CtINTECIf■■ STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER �= STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS 1 SECTION VIEWS ...R° STOWNWATER np yyA 2 TOP VIEW,NOTES AND DATA 3 7555 8W TECH CENTER DR / TIO STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT ' soumoos_ STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNff OR maA+s..+.m. IT noun I IrA c R e INM w Lew aH A I1 MX IuM A O -r�.e.. a cn, cacR,R �SOLUf NS. STANDARD DETAIL-1 CARTRIDGE UNIT Tom. I IRWMa•a Ra.M.a1L IR.wwe.uN lacclaP.�aa r.+.mrR,rrm. un:lVOWS IMxa:Rw 11aYNYACrRr1+oR IawwR.wN IPl.YRRA4D 0OI Rf1 . ♦ X1101 IN APPROVED I` (. a s•A ' y EC I+�f' - ,-PAVED PARKING 1). ?„, 1. MATTING 1� /TOT 'EXPIRES: 2/31/13 W �,, RIVER ROCK 2' -3/4- _�� ` 2.5-- 3-DEEP .• . I ( ■ i= . ��11 �!.0,,, :1�- . •• DiOUP YACXENZff 2013 w SWALE BOTTOM A rJ,,,fir±f' © u1 RIGHTS ZE 2a-D 2'MIN. ! 7!- THESE USED OR REPRCWfED IN ANY PROPERTY NNER. { CROUP YAf1(EN21E AIO ARE NOT f0 BE TI f�I' WITHOUT PRIOR SMITTEN PERMISSION REVISIONS: REVISOR DELTA 2' i CLOSING DOE 'DRAIN R•• 113 GROWING MEDIU 1 IN PROGRESS 6'MIN. 6"MIN. SWALE AREA FREEBOARD EBOARD TREATMENT AREA FREEBOARD BUFFER/MITIGATION 8'MINIMUM WIDTH AREA AREA EC MATTING ECONOJUTE• POCONUT FIBER OR GEOJUTE PLU ECONOJUTE• ECONOJUTEW(S>2010 SEED MIX LOW GROW MIX NONE LOW GROW MI) AS APPROVED BY SEE NOTE #5 SEE NOTE/5 DISTRICT OR CITY MAX. SLOPE I 3:1 3:1 I FLAT B0TT0111 4:1 4:1 NA •OR AS APPROVED NOTES 1. REFER TO APPENDIX A.CRS DESIGN&COISTRUCnIN STANDARDS,FOR LANDSCAPING SHEET TITLE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING TREE PLACEMENT.TOPSOIL AND PLANTING SAECIFICATICNS R1GTA■ . ILT 2. PROVIDE IRRIGATION AS APPROVED BY CMS {/GIf\L Q�E 3. JUTE MATTING-GEGJUTE FIBER PLUS IN TREATMENT AREA,ECOIIQRITE FOR ALL OTHER AREAS OR SIMWAR FABRICS.COCONUT FIBER IS ALSO ACCEPTABLE 4. 12-INCHES OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED THROUGHOUT THE WATER GUAUTY TRACT. 5. FREEBOARD AREA SEED MIL DWARF TALL FESCUE 104 DWARF PEAENIAL RYE 3014 CREEPING RED FESCUE 251. COLONIAL BENT GRASS 5%APPLY AT A RATE OF 1204/ACRE. Oi LIDA SWALE C�.2 N.T.S. DRAWN BY MH CHECKED BY: MWB SHEET: /� C8.2 JOB NO. 2130079 W MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 6/11/13 ��7./��,7 o o i____: •♦ c c 3® i S o m j 0 O. «e «po aai• 13 2 : o N PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE y' N SYM80L # BOTANICAL NAME - SIZE� Al Q`C J • � COMMON NAME SPACING 'j n I ,' TREES raD. • I, -. _ I.Ie 0 i "1 v 1 EXISTING AUSTRIAN PINE TO BE REMOVED AS SHOWN o o 8.? 1 ^ c c P. m S F c o >M O O« ��, 6 EXISTING RED MAPLE STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN �� a d L WITH TREE PROTECTION FENCING . of c •i` ►►i c,L m m oN 'i .� - g=oo �� Jl W U e o «N i / -•,, ..„ l K ire°c 2 1..1 UD)I-_I LL b• EXISTING TREE STAND TO REMAIN , SYMBOL TREE STAND d DOMINENT SPECIES ESTIMATED SECOND DOMINENT ESTIMATED 'THIRD DOMINENT ESTIMATED Ghent AVERAGE DBH SPECIES AVERAGE 0B1-1 AVERAGE DBH STAND ge ST AIbi/3 ./ PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII 14" ALNUS RUBRA 12" THUJA PLICATA 14" I - �- _ I � 1 DOUGLAS FIR RED ALDER _WESTERN RED CEDAR / _ 2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII 16" ALNUS RUBRA 15" THUJA PLICATA 14" liej / DOUGLAS FIR RED ALDER WESTERN RED CEDAR ---syal/„ ���/ /';r /./� // • % 3 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII 14" PINUS NIGRA 16 THUJA PLICATA 16" I _ _ /�� .4-, i/,' �� _DOUGLAS FIR AUSTRIAN PINE WESTERN RED CEDAR• STAND 02 f` I I ' • GJ .115+, • Yer STAND d1 r I • �' •" •�4, / THE TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN• SECTION 10, PART 1 OF THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. ) ' r STEWS • �;I - I . BAY OMR.R. .. -- • ■ MAN ODOR __-__ �- Project 1 I \ Lade TENANT �, 11 MR `y M'ROVEMENT /I e,0 • / f'. , 7555 SW TECH CENTER DR ��I _ _ - TIGARD,OR (�r , 1 0 ) EXISTING GRAVEL /�' LOT II �r '� A EXISTING BUILDING I r I i j �! L I TREE PROTECTION MFA URFQ ' UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED FOR REMOVAL ALL TREES SHALL RECEIVE PROTECTIVE MEASURES FOR I' g j THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY Of TIGARD REQUIREMENTS. © GROUP NACNENZIE 2013 8 ALL RIGHTS RESERKD i 5.HIGH MINIMUM METAL CONSTRUCTION FENCING,WITH 2"DIA. POSTS DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF %� MAN DOER i _ A MINIMUM OF 2'. GALVANIZED IRON POSTS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 10'SPACING AND SHALL BE GROUP MACKERZIE AND ARE Not TO E ■li . i'. MAINTAINED.FENCING SHALL COMPLETELY SURROUND THE TREE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER, WITHOUT PRIOR ARITTEN PERMISSION 1 NO ACTIVITY MAY BE CONDUCTED WITHIN ANY DESIGNATED TREE PROTECTION AREA INCLUDING BUT iiii�c • NOT UNITED TO PARKING EQUIPMENT.PLACING SOLVENTS.STORING MATERIALS AND SOIL DEPOSITS. REVISIONS: 1�` DUMPING CONCRETE WASHOUT.OR OTHER DEBRIS,OR ANY EXCAVATION OR COMPACTION WORK. la/ DURING CONSTRUCTION NO OBJECTS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO ANY TREE DESIGNATED TO BE RETAINED mimes tt�5�b1G DATA J MAN GOOF um DOOR AND PROTECTED. 71RT /' A END DOOR BAY ODOR Y_.�• BAY DOOR MU'DOOR MULCH COVER TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 67, PLYWOOD,OR OTHER SIMILAR MATERIAL REQUIRED Al t X IN PROGRESS ►' I - I,` — _ AREAS ADJOINING DESIGNATED TREE PROTECTION AREAS TO PROTECT ROOTS FROM DAMAGE CAUSED ��� 1) da UM DOOR , BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT. COORDINATE PLACEMENTS AND LOCATION WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. . 4) / ST. _ • PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PLACE UNTIL REMOVAL IS AUTHORIZED BY CITY OR ®' A' UNTIL A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED. ��•s : Ila--.411 1 T��r��*. NOTES: TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL BE 5' IN HEIGHT AND SET AS SHOWN. �`` / .-• - m 9' CITY SHALL APPROVE INSTALLED TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRIOR TO ON-SITE � �v / /I AS'.- 169 e... d•MR I' GRADING ACTIVITIES. &f` �I �_�• FENCE MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST METAL CONSTRUCTION FENCING SECURED SHEET TITLE j / ' TO GALVANIZED IRON POSTS. TREE PRESERVATION i '/ FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND REMOVAL /�.L ACTIVITIES. MOVEMENT OR REMOVAL OF FENCE REQUIRES APPROVAL BY CITYS PLAN 1 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 1 „-y' s y ..;e �' TREE PROTECTION i d . d d d /��� �. 1./4 ` I N 5 .iy/�/ r, P4 ,' • .. I�I DRAWN BY:TEB �� t _ ■,I STAND/3 . �! /� 10"08H 9" DBH •� �� CHECKED BY. RML 2"DBH / 11"DBH 11"DOH SHEET: SW TECH CENTER I " DR 70 60 LL I A.0 (IN FEET) - I.imh.30 DL ®TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN i SCALE: 1" - 30' JOB NO. Aye 19f.W 00 LLNVV/7 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE - 7/30/13 m cow 3w o r -p N N PUNT SYMBOL 1 Qy�. OT .a_ V O C SYMBOL / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE( ' ;::i__ _:A: ;o �m M op Y` 1 EXISTING SCOTCH PINE STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN ii: Om t'1.7 EXISTING AS SHOWN \ o I►I c 0. c°g e .0 Y •o , 1 EXISTING CAPITAL PEAR TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN W C. •ttv CAL BAB• 11 ZELKOVA$ERRATA 2"AS SHORN 1 CINnt LLI ' �.,,-.._r"�., r n 60 US 61/ AX JAPONICA'GREEN BEAUTY G� T.AS Yer / �/ / ® 103 SPIBA'GOLOFLAIE' Gip T. GOLDFLAVE AS�I I % EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO Rome ::: . Inwi STABS ./.� BT � /• �� - 9 166 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSN® .d. P,o,ect MAN 110fIR ° / LHCb TENANT I MAN DOOR ° ...... 1,805 SF MARK SEEDS 10 SEED MIX f0O SEED .000 SF FAPROVEINENT I U W •j 0'11 / WATER GUALTTY SWALE-PER CWS I ' 6 ACER C1RCINATLWI 2 GAL ONT.. 7565 3W TECH CENT DR AS SHOWN I i% O VINE MAPLE / CENTER TIGARD,OR �1 1 .� 1 T G/ 22 RIBES SANGUINEUM GAL CON T,o MIN.HT. 1.5/ EXISTING GRAVEL G7� i� , RED FLOWERING CURRANT AS SHOWN LOT - e 17 RED-OSIER ilo AWOOD T COW I AS SHORN I I( I m % :;: 1.110 JUNCOS PATENS PLUGS �'. SPREADING RUSH 6 PER SF I sSC;djyab. I � '�.��'. MIN.HT. 6" i, L I EXISTING BUILDING P .,,r... na SF FREEBOARD AREA SEEP MIX SEED . sfrs� -DWARF PALL PERENNIAL R AO% 120 LBS./ACRE t .f• -DWARF PERENNIAL RYE 30% - CREEPING RED FESCUE 25% I I OOH ,s` COLONIAL BENT GRASS 5% ■I �� �TW. et, ' 1�TARING © GROIN YACKENZIE 2013 V , Alt RIGHTS ER�LD I •'• _ THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF Nm j ��p��� MOW,NACNCNIIE AND ARE NOT TO BE I tF�i1CAl l �QM1L NOTES OSW OR REPROONCED IN ANY NANER. / $ WIIHWT MICR WtITTEN PERNISSId! / `�I / 1. FULLY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED TO MAMTAN ALL LANDS/CAPE MATERIAL. REVISIONS I I 2. NEW 1DEDSCAPE AREAS,HEMLOCK EXCEPT K MULCH ATER FACILITY.OF 2 INCHES THROUGHOUT <women IRN101 0O.7A ■,.• MAN DOOR NAN DOOR i I 3. SEE CMl SHEET C8.2 FOR WATER OUAJTY$WALE OCTA1L >�Q7 0.0®q M S.'.: °o: BAT DOOR BAY DOW NAN DOOR :IPROGRESS , BA7 DOOR Y N° O KEIER,I S 4. 1. BIKE RACK- SEE CIVIL 2. CONCRETE SPLASH PAD- SEE CIVIL• SRE COVERAGE DATA 1 Airy. EXISTING CONDITION FINAL CONDITION e 1 PLAN Awilitilik PXI�1r^yrl^'��� TOTAL 517E AREA 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) 217,960 SF (5.00 Ac) \, J e LANDSCAPE AREA: 61,805 SF (tA0 AC) 63,185 SF (1.13 AC) (29.01[) Or', Algal t,411 AN / !"-I ••lam r % �i %%'. .�j�: , . ///i � //��� ���%%�h� DRAWN BY:TED - //i%.I/i. ///%/ - '-/ f'. .Iii la --— /, , '//I�_ _%/I�=1. CHECKED BY: RML _ 30 0 15 30 60 110 SHEET: SW TECH CENTER DR > c�h v� TY�e� d� n o� need IN FEET, L2W1 ®LANDSCAPE PLAN , SCALE: 1'- 30' JOB N0. 2130079.00 - - X15--w -fee. nof skywnori L2 .0 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE - 9/3/13 — SUPPLEMENTAL FEPORT PLANT MATERIAL SCHEDULE a TREE STAND/ DOMINANT SPECIES ESTIMATED ESTIMATED AVERAGE i; ! E ND DOMINANT ESTIMATED ESTMATED AVERAGE THIRD OOA�ANT ESTIMATED ESTIMATED AVERAGE TOTAL ON SITE TREE SUITABILITY FOR SYMBOL / BOTANICAL NAME- SIZE� - c ;°w 0. AVERAGE DBH CONDITION RATING AVERAGE DBH CONDITIRATING AVERAGE DBH CONDITI ON RATING CANOPY AREA OF PESERVARATING NG c m 2 • OSUGA MENZIESII 14' 2 14" 2 15.846 SF 2♦ A FIR TREE• 2 PSEUD07SUGA MENZIESI! 16' 2 14" 2 DOUGLAS FIR 3 PSEUDOTSUGA MZIESII 14" 2 NA 16" 2 THUJA PLICATA 16 3 5 ESG RSTREET TRE TO REMN AS SHOWN E WESTERN RED CEDAR - y 3 `•, EXISTING TREE CANOPY CO VERAGE-STANDS ! Ii P. TREE STAND/ TOTAL ON SITE TREE 4 .d 1 CANOPY 151 STAND III 14 ZZEELHOVA SERRATA 2" S SHOWN a.!CC S o II ROBIN LAUGH O 0 M ii 4.i LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2 24,130 SF �I [111 MACKENZIE AR CSTRE 2'CAL B6B AS DWN ►I O �1 503-224-9560 1DNDUAL TREE CANOPY-GROUP A - w`2° N / / ` RLAUGHLIN4M/gENZECOM CROUP CANOPY A AREA OFRSTAND {„1. U W LI a°n A 3,900 SF LEGEND 1 \ TREE CANOPY COVERAGE TOTALS EANOPY 70 REMAIN giant STAND/2 STAID/3 TOTAL 52.352 SF W: Y AT MATURITY COVERAGE 104,704 SF ■ _•-:�7i`•W' '•����/ � �j `1 DOUBLE iwwll STAND/z /r �/ SITE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE STAND/1 ' ?'Y _ ? g.!...-,,. ?> s.. / R F I t a_C '�•,/ ��i TOTAL SITE AREA: 217,960 SF(5.00 AC) �, �1`-'' .t4 F o -, _ '♦; EXISTING TREE CANOPY COVERAGE: 104,704 SF (2.4 AC) 48x /1 i ,-,Ti.:y` °p- PROPOSED NEW TREE CANOPY COVERAGE: 29,603 SF (0.68 AC) 14% / I z z :I I� TOTAL SITE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE: 134,307 SF (3.08 AC) 62x, It \ \ 'i I• 3 6214 1S GREATER THAN THE MINIMUM 33%TOTAL OUAL/Y1NG EFFECTIVE TREE CANOPY /i I /y �' ] ii COVER FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT SITE THEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. / - O 7 1 8AY ODDR / -- 1 �\ 1 / MAN DDax f f;J P uAN DDDR�`7 THE REQUIREMNTS IN SECTION 10,PART 2 /1 \% / i/f/ 1 / / -A - 5. NO HERITAGE TREES ARE ON SITE. 1 /11 1 �y�� pI�I� ��� I -. / --_ 1 EXISTING OVN..LJII`�\.i If:� Roble M.LaoyWa fir/ \II' ---=` 1, SOL CHARAG SOIL 1ICS �v oREAON 1 11 OIL—�� �.i/� —� •\ ,i%% TREE STAND/ SOIL CHARACTERISTICS 4P1A 1 1 THE VEGETATION IN THIS AREA IS PRIMARILY NATIVE TREES WITH AN \ �// AaE1O /� O�� 7' AN IN VA VES INCLUDING �: ff g GROUP TITS RZE ZO13 1 II ,� / ■ \ $ S/l 2 BLACKBERRY. SOILS IN THIS AREA DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN RECENTLY ® ALL RIaTS RESERTCe P 1 } DISTURBED OR COMPACTED. TREE GROWTH LIMITING CONDITIONS WERE NOT 'mu(DRAa1NG5 ARE THE PROPERTY 6 !1._ \ -/ u c DCAI 4• 3 OBSERVED. GRO� ./ ;1 USE,I MI1 NEW TREE EXISTING SOILS IN THESE AREAS HAVE BEEN RECENTLY DISTURBED AND I l� 1 / ' 1 CANOPY COMPACTED. TOPSOIL DOES N07 APPEAR 70 BE PESENT. WITHIN THESE REI -_ /E AREAS,EXISTING$OILS WILL BE SAMPLED AND ANALYZED AND TESTED 70 6�1 ASCERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS POTASH SOLUBLE SALT pF\ uAN o007 . I ORGANIC MATTER, AND PH VALUE. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO USE gg par mSINC�� THE TEST RESULTS IN DETERMINING AND PROVIDING THE PROPER BALANCE RAY DOOR DAY DOOR my�OpR rMM'DOOR J 1 �� _ BAY DOOR / OF SOIL AMENDMENTS AND FER71U2ERS TO BRING THE SOIL INTO THE NORMAL 1 X IN PROGRESS '.� I_ I } "'IBu '— -. uAN�p /� RANGE FOR THE TESTED PARAMETERS. AMONG THE MEASUREMENTS INCLUDE ReaMil I t) `l ESTABLISHING A PH VALVE BETNEEN 5.4 AND 7.0,BEING FREE OF STONES �CI � \ \ STN_ L1 _ ' LARGER THAN 3/4 INCH AND FREE OF EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS HARMFUL TO \' ��Qia�4 !' PLANT LIFE. -" /L/?Jrr�l�iJO�/�i ". &/¢ • ,:• 1 d ,c ¢ ET,A. SHEET TITLE: \ / ., . a `- �' TREE CANOPY j I + -4- . EVE PLAN 10"DBH � `'..� /��/ 9"DBH li�^ s d d I d d d hi 11'DBH/%� /� r S, 4 , • / A I /L µ.V 'iv 1 / 1��1 DRAWN BY:TEB 1'- / £ _�/� "7/� i �.r.. it/'; STAND f3_ \ _• - .`,"- CHECKED BY:RML / \ 12"DBH 11'DBH 11'DBH a SHEET: . SW TECH •. A DR i INDIVIDUAL TREE CANOPY-GROUP A 30 C 1 30 3: 120 . CD 1 ?„ -- __- _ c IN FEE'. OTREE CANOPY SITE PLAN 01 ► / ; "°" 3C :` SCALE: 1`- 30• �l tJ JOB N0. 2130079.00 �1C, Y/1 'gees OA\ .1-. 1 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE—8/7/13 1 PLANT AAATERIAL SCHEDULE TREE TABLE ED SYMBOL / BOTANICAL NAME- TREE/ SPECIES OPEN SOIL VOLUME COVERED SOIL VOLUME TOTAL SOIL VOLUME AVERAGE MATURE CANOPY X OF CANOPY OVER PARKING LOT AREA OVER PARKING LOT 2 17,E,6.. AVERAGE MATURE MATURE g < COMMON NAME CANOPY SPREAD CANOPY COVERAGE - _ of TREES 01 ZELXOVA 345 CF 1,062 CF 1,407 CF 50'SPREAD(1.963 SF) - 59X 1,158 SF •a d Y W - 02 ZELKOVA 281 CF 1,203 CF 1,464 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 72% 1,422 SF -a o I g I 5 EXISTING RED MAPLE STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN 30'SPREAD(650 SF) 3.900 SF 03 ZELKOVA -- -281 CF 1.203 CF 1.464 CF SO'SPREAD(1.983 SF) 72X 1,420 SF u O c 2°n i \ a 'c:v W ZELKOVA 1,194 Cr 0 CF 1,194 CF 50•SPREAD(1,963 SF) 84% t,645 SF <£ OS ZELKOVA 261 CF 1,206 CF 1,467 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 88X 1,718 SF ;w 0 m 14 ZELKOVA ERRATA 2•CAL 88 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 27,482 SF OB ZELKOVA 204 CF 1,125 CF 1.329 CF `50'SPREAD(1.963 SF) 71X 1,400 SF Ni ZELKOVA AS SHOWN a 07 ZELKOVA .327 CF 1.125 CF 1,329 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 81% 1,587 SF r-56 o `• 08 ZELKOVA 1,787 CF 0 CF 1.767 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 5F) 72X 1,414 SF m W o 2 \\111 3 ACER CMAPESTRE 2•CAL.Bd6 30'SPREAD(707 SF) Z121 SF a°c a t HEDGE MAPLE AS SHOWN 09 ZELKOVA 327 CF 1.185 CF 1,512 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 80X 1,580 SF :c°c< 0 10 ZELKOVA 1,767 CF 0 CF 1,767 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 72X 7,408 SF c w o p m 1 TOTAL NEW CANOPY AREA: 29,603 SF ll `o o v 11 ZELKOVA 804 CF 960 CF 1,764 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 83X 1,627 SF w $a `e r 12 ZELKOVA 1,850 CF 0 CF 1,650 CF 50'SPREAD(1,963 SF) 77X 1,514 SF C ,`-I o co 69 UWfJ am • 13 RED MAPLE 1,599 CF 0 CF 1,599 CF 30'SPREAD(650 SF). - 23X 162 SF OHM \ 14 RED MAPLE 1,599 Cr 0 CF 1,599 CF 30'SPREAD(650 SF). 15% 98 SF 15 RED MAPLE 1,599 CF 0 CF 1,599 a 30'SPREAD(650 SF)• 17% 118 SF 16 RED MAPLE 1,695 CF 0 CF 1,695 CF 30'SPREAD(650 SF). 18% 110 SF 17 RED MAPLE 1,749 CF 0 CF 1,749 CF 30'SPREAD(850 SF). 17% 114 SF - / \ - 1,530 CF SO'SPREAD(1,983 SF) 78X 1,532 SF (111Jiler -_ L'�ttiE1,rtflaxnnc waL MTV \ 18 ZELKOVA 345 CF 1,185 CF ' \ 19 ZELKOVA 1.917 CF 0 CF 1.917 CF 50'SPREAD(1.963 SF) 62% 1,223 SF . \ 20 HEDGE MAPLE 1,464 CF 0 CF 1.484 CF 30'SPREAD(707 SF) OX 0 SF � I ry' , 3l A -' I I \` ■ 21 HEDGE MAPLE 1,488 CF 0 CF 1.488 CF 30'SPREAD(707 SF) 0% 0 SF I "'r / 22 HEDGE MAPLE 1,539 CF 0 CF 1,539 CF 30'SPREAD(707 SF) 0.8% 2 SF Ate, wiz I I ".. 23 RED MAPLE 1,284 CF 0 CF 1.284 CF 30'SPREAD(650 SF). 32% 219 SF N I : .+`* ,Irre, STAIRS 44y P n� :r �?"�` k ® TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE DAY DIXR ied9t -- CANOPY AREA 21,471 SF ' r �,Za 1 w m •NOTE STATED CANOPY COVERAGE FOR THIS TREE IS BASED ON EXISTING TREE CANOPY AT PRESENT. , t N Xis y '+r3. / `yam DOOR _ P�ro�pcptr 1 _ - _ ` MAN DOOR 1� i I LEGEND IMPRO REN xC 'D% 0\1 I (jtk ' I INDIVIWAL MATURE TREE CANY W7UNE g ' QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COVER ��U NG L ` OPEN SOIL VOLUME LOT x t 1b°''�C ` 3 COVERED SOIL VOLUME • • I' j k,' ,',,,,,,,.._ EXISTING B LB DtN _ PARKING LOT AREA BOUNDARY �• �k�{ �' ° ` GAh7I wRf WIWARl _ ra Roy.M.Log1W i . I PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY COVERAGE DATA . N 11h \ I +�-�4's- PARKING LOT AREA 71,105 SF � � T TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE TREE CANOPY AREA 21.471 SF I � [.. `���P ; "i-•',.4.- I 1 ItJ X CANOPY COVER PROVIDED: 30.2% RIGHTS EESERVED3 N ,Ii c --1-� / vAN oDDP MINIMUM X CANY COVER REIR : 3p% TNESE ptArwNTS ARE THE PitaPERTY GRCVP MACKENZIE AND ARE 1100 TO 30.2%LS EQUAL TO THE MINIMUM OF 30%TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COER USTA Oil RODIIFA IN ANY MANNETHEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. wITN0D1 PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION NOTE CANOPY AREA PER TREE IS DETERMINED FROM THE VALUE G1VEN IN THE CITY OF TIGARD REVISIONS PAy„ -- PARKING LOT TREE LIST FOR A MATURE TREE OF THAT SPECIES. t MAT:OOCR r sizi DATETA I \ FM.ODOR r;8: a 9«21 i #u`a DAY OWN&.Y DG a rum I10DR T D°_ocAN DAY DOOR I 1 X IN PROGRESS �1��'' cp u1, MN DOOR I PARKN G LOT TREE SQL.VOLUME REOUFIBVENT$ o'V, � '"Y�n LSTa.- Si MINIMUM SOIL VOLUME REQUIREMENT(CF PER TREE) 1,000 CF :w � �lpEllglfE� bs. °.. .E. \\ :,,.4..,.-4.711r, q. I"1 1 � i_ NOTE R�------ ----_ �_ T / �1 �� � _': 1. THE TREE CANOPY SITE PLAN MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 10.PART 2 ' 7 •_� rJ %I` OF THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. SHEET TITLE PAR P1G LOT \ I I _ • 2 THE TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN MEETS ALL OF THE THE REQUIREMENTS TREE CANOPY IN SECTION 10,PART 1 OF THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL; I I 3 THE CANOPY SITE PLAN MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION f0,PART 2 OF PLAN ,{,��' rt ( I THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL; AND er' � �, K'�xk { A A I A I d d � 4. THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 10,PART 3 4rn l��,F OF THE URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL 23Q•� �`T`Qq� o- s12u.y,.�Zj'Qa '. R.� a �� �� �,a. .e� �,�� a�� � � ©� � a G,l) DRAWN BY:TEB 1 - 13 ,"�= �`.�` a"QZ00CW-A8 @d ROBIN LAUGHI.IN y 2Y 14 \ ?D" 75 18 17 1`. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CHECKED BY:RML MACKENZIE SHEET: I 1515 SE WATER AVE, /100 TECH�I�1FR PORTLAND 224 868097293 a 0 • SW RLAUGHLJNOAICKNZE.COM 30 0 15 30 50 120 O PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY PLAN I IN 1E1:T, L2 SCALE: 1 •30 - 30 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE -8/7/13 Joe NO . � I a W < <O c c 3 0 a O Opp VN S� ye INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REQUIRED v t]e Ile BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT. SCH. 40 MAINLINE « , W° GATE VALVES, UNIONS&SCH. 80 NIPPLES ``..c of AND ELL TO BE SAME SIZE AS VAULT WITH LOCKABLE VALVE BOX AND COVER: <c • BACKFLOW PREVENTER. LID AMAETEK 11X17 WITH GREEN < ISOLATION VALVE LID B! LAWN AREAS AND SCH 80 ADAPTER&FITTINGS TO BE ;o FINISH GRADE BROWN VD 1N SHRUB AREAS SAME SIZE AS ISOLATION VALVE. i 1` DOUBLE CHECK VALVE FINISH GRADE . VALVE BOX WITH c°! c G ..A1 I�o�i o-na 4"PVC SLEEVE ° ° ■o '^M I uon: ne•;3 UNION EACH SIDE TYP. � LOCKABLE LID ��� >�„ I I METER PER CIVIL 1_11-I i:A� n r.M-ir n-n3 FINISH GRADE PI- - _ MANUAL DRAIN VALVE n - - - p i1=il ii=:1� MALE::::::: 11�11�11�11�11�1/' Il�il�ll 11 111111 11 c 1=11011011011011'• 111151 REDUCER a c Z 11m11m11r1111"/ 1101;.11 AL 80 ii w y<BAOW PRE7ER 1114 �•'=110111101111"111..! .tl.�:P!�1� -«o_• •• •� __-__ 1 MPH rYP 11011011011'•.11.!!;% ' b-1 ; GRAIN ROCK- 1MAINLINE °L $ GATE vALVE 1 _ IIi= 111110ll! >.�.:1: O 11�IIC11511511i:•:__ :�:•�_•1151151i2._�II W p�III � `II SCH t0 MAINLINE 001' •+! 1 i1 3 CU. F7. MIN. =101101101.7.111' _ _.- - 110�I011011� ISOLATION/GATE VALVE, e°y°�. IIIIP In . 1/1101/11 ®I �i 41011011 EQUIPPED FOR KEYED _>;.a` -°� V QUICK COUPLER 1 4111:-.:•:.: nei 110110110110110•••`•�:'11c11011 1101/11011 11 11011 11 1 NnaiMIIC w o 1=LI d$ BRICK OR CONCRETE .•.•! :: 1111011011011011011011011011'a!1011'a`! OPERATION 1 !�1iCl 10110111101111_._._.4A-A110111 '8121=11711-IISIPIIOIIOIIOIt'°71=1101/: BLOCK TYP. 11011011=110110!�!:•:!:!�4�'i1E11:11 a11z11m11a11�11n11m11o11m11z11mioIli 4"MIN. DRAIN ROCK i7M7M7Mu7NPPiM7nneu_42e _ _ 111 1=1111011011011C1101101101101P".! CD.nt :n7n7_�7_�7�17�17_�7R7n7R7n:_�__�__ 111011011011011∎.!:!.00_'0111101 21101111■11■1121111111111:11011 DRAIN ROCK 4"DEEP 11�11�11�11�11��"�'.�����'�':11�11�11 BRICK OR CONC. BLOCK MAINUNE 10110111111011%:c:!:!:!:!-'011-1101 1111111111110110110111101101111 11011011011011■1I- a11C11011011 0U10H10U10�17.E=U0O10H101E01�0l10�10 111011011011011■110110110111101 � � 11 011011011011011011011011011011 LLI 0)POINT OF CONNECTION BACKFLOW PREVENTER MANUAL DRAIN VALVE ISOLATION/GATE VALVE Yer SCALE: NTS BELOW GRADE SCALE NTS a SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS VALVE BOX WITH COVER FINISH GRADE/TOP OF FINISH GRADE MULCH QUICK-COUPLING VALVE 14111P- AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER ' PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PAVING CLEAN AND LIGHTLY WITH LOCKABLE DOOR Proj.ct 3 INCH MINIMUM DEPTH = < COMPACTED BACKFILL = ( T i`,� p OF 3 4 INCH WASHED = a5 SCH 40 CONDUIT FOR IIIPRO'VBIB�IT / $ COMMON AND CONTROL ! ...-0 II GRAVEL < TRACKING TAPE 6" � s Ei IPE T LINE I'�"'�I "�''_ 1 I ��TRACKING TAPE 8"ABOVE °D 111.111 ��''_"'� BUILDING FLOOR 1 •� ,1 " o i' SCH 4o PVC SLEEVE iii■sTi ffi• . iii="' ELECTRICAL CONDUIT PVC MAINLINE PIPE "' ��r 11=111 6.4...e��Q-111 1 ,� � _ _ _ ' ALL WIRE 70 BE PVC SCH 40 ELL r' iiJ' 111=111=111_1110:11i0 �i ATTACH IRRIGATION WIRE m I: SC INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL TO MAINLINE AT I 111=1�=11� ,1 ELECTRICAL CODE. ■ 2"X 2 REDWOOD STAKE NOTE: INTERVALS OF 25'-0" "- I��MMuM�� VERIFY LOCATION PRIOR WITH STAINLESS STEEL EXTEND IRRIGATION — TO INSTALLATION. GEAR CLAMPS SLEEVES 18"BEYOND INSTALL CONTROLLER EACH SIDE OF PAVING. PER MANUFACTURER'S ■ SINSTR SUCTIONS. SEE m GALA RIGHTS RE POD 43)QUICK COUPLING VALVE IRRIGATION SLEEVES AT PAVING fi,IRRIGATION TRENCH WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER T DRAWINGS ENZ ARE THE PROPERTY Of GROUP DRAWI E ARE NOT T BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANl MANNER, SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS WITHOUT PRICK WRITTEN PERMISSION COILED WIRE REVISIONS: WATERPROOF CONNECTION VALVE BOX WITH COVER REVISION DArzTA FINISH GRADE/TOP OF 1 IN PROGRESS MULCH PAVEMENT OR CURB REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 1"MIN. TOP OF SPRINKLER FLUSH . PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE 3"MAX WITH FINISH GRADE, AFTER PVC SCH. 40 ELL. SETTLING FINISH GRADE t vv�v VvvWr /i�>i�/,I\`/`— ' a j� PVC SCH.80 NIPPLE r Up4\\p�i,�0 �ii.:::,p\\i�E � �li�i,V/Ji f ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER '///��I/\\\���t I, Ill BRIO( TYP. �G�4�/\; POP-UP SPRINKLER SHEET TITLE: Oj/\�y� 1 U/ vAY BARBED MARLEX INSERT LII111, 1,1,'LI;111' PVC SCH 40 NIPPLE T V PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL /L /i A/\ \\ 1 Y\\\\\ \ K�' LENGTH AS REQUIRED/ �' -�� SCH. 80 NIPPLE AND SCH. /iii ✓/✓/ B�i��Y k THREADED ELL �' �� „ PVC SCH 40 ELL )�\y� �Il i6/S@ O `�Y,^j a^ per o\f 'oa o\� DET�B G d �M_M I ® 40 ELL, /�//p\/// \\O�G \t1�, is POLY SWING PIPE-MIN. 15" �J ��' �0 '\G�D��� //L� •R R ` 4�G0// LENGTH MAX 30"LENGTH PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL //`/ 4 AA�, PVC MAINLINE PIPE \�/\\H6�00jt/ �..\��0���/ ..y��*F?R: \a o.\o �:/\� '� IRON/ /.�\/.�` i� � BARBED MARLEX INSERT la'.._`��� ��j✓�/Va... 0r-,,\ ., &THREADED ELL r PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH. 40 MALE \/O�N\//W\\`'l�`S`Off\\//O//O��//\��\Z‹ •s` i , ADAPTER ' TEE *Am DRAWN BY:TEB PVC LATERAL PIPE LATERAL LINE PVC LATERAL PIPE CHECKED BY: RML 3"MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" ' ' WASHED GRAVEL SHEET: e ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 031SPRAY POP-UP SPRINKLER ROTOR POP-UP SPRINKLER L8.1 SCALE: NTS NTS SCALE: NTS JOB NO. 2130079.00 MAJOR MODFICATION SUBMTTAL- 6/11/13 C co <o c c W 0 o• •IS 1 j D•• A O O O• •O N EDGE OF IYEWNDCOVER °•T7 AREA/WALK EDGE <S <o DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS ;w HOSE CHAFING GUARD SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 1/2 THE SPECIFIED O.C. 2"ABOVE BURLAP GRADE ,41* • SPACING •0 AND REMOVE BURLAP AND • o• •0 EDGE WY CABLE TWINE FROM TOP HALF �, ROW AREA/WALK EDGEGRWNDCOVER c°�� e o C V >O 111111 OF ROOTBALL TRI-SPACE, AT SPECIFIED N^yb i g 2 DISTANCE FROM EDGE IS •! 1111 2 x 2 x B' WOOD STAKE O.C.DISTANCE- 4p�N 1/2 THE SPECIFIED O.C. o C o< o KEEP CLEAR OF ROOTBALL `.`-) MULCH, 2"DEPTH EQUIDISTANT o c\ PLANT CENTER I SPACING m • p b Z SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL FINISH GRADE ROW • O• v 3 I - r ABOVE FINISH GRADE Awn W„a w c p o AyyT••�I!t�I�yH�T�r!IS 9.�I:NI i ♦•�V•• TRI-SPACE AT SPECIFIED •s� +E �•• :!+T?eq:4_S,ga __...715n-Ir 'II-II-R.-R.. MULCH, 2"DEPTH 15"=11_ :::S 111�I II 1�II 11 II -n=11..-11 ' �•��1=11=11=11-1 1 imn 11 co co 1> 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 cop ..<: 241•-0' m:a ••I `O A I 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' 24'-0' G. o to o D co n L r..13 U O C m . NEW FIRE ACCESS < DOOR Alp STAIR ;n. 4 O A O b A. rr ... .. OW DW OW OW v m o I .mo a c o ac O° cwm0 0.O I I C j a V C N 1 W m° s NEW FIRE 2 IL e v °! ACCESS DOOR o PRODUCTION 0 W 1-_I d 1 123 .o 5,953 SF Client INFILL DRIVE-IN W DOOR WITH r \ STOREFRONT 3 0 ? Yer O WAREHOUSE IL I-X 3 ° ® J Atii;; 31,040 SF �JJ[11 I.l n n B tfl1fl iblr" • N A. I O oH Project Lags TB4ANT NEW STOREFRONT WINDOW IMPROVELENT -2 NEW FIRE \ REPAIR �r f H — LJ 2i 7555 5W TECH CENTER DR ACCESS DOOR 2,902 SF T� J E 1 _ DOOR WITH DRIVE-IN 710AFRD,OR L? -I i r 1 STOREFRONT { I 1 O • • • o 3 win I m r g, -I \—REPLACE SOLID REMODEL EXISTING ' I DOOR WITH OFFICE MEZZANINE STOREFRONT DOOR T i : I GROW MACKENZIE 2013 rin\_: I ../M L _L '1- -1--J : © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED C THESE CRANKS ARE THE PlOT TO BC ___. GROUP REPRODUCED IE MD ARE NOT TO BE 1111111111 U r-� r-, °WIITTHOUTPRIOOR RITTEEN ANY MANNER, I--r-1 �T� r 1 IIIIIIIIIIII■ I -I V r—� II 1 I J I I I I I I = REVISIONS at,Mtge AMMON—7---© -_+A- L L J i 0 ( �� n� O I, -�"-� rTl r�� r� I I r m-I m © WQ aDB.ow rA NEW FIRE INFILL DRIVE-IN NEW DOCK �\ F `u E 1 L O ACCESS DOOR TO CREATE NEW RETAINING WALL I DOCK DOOR I•-0'-a, 24'-0' / 24'-01' / 24'-0' / 24•-0' 24'-0' , 24'-0' �, 24'-0' / 24'-0' Z 24'-0' k 24'-0 , 24'-0' 24'-O' 24'-0' 241'-0' SHEET TITLE o 0 0 a o o a ,o >> o • • m OVERALL FLOOR PLAN /' OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 0(;-.) MEZZANINE 1/16 FLOOR PLAN 1/16'■1'-0' ' 1'-0' DRAWN BY:EW LEGEND CHECKED BY RCT • • 9'x10'OH DOCK DOOR ® NEW FULL HEIGHT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE WALL • SEE DETAIL SHEET. Q DRIVE-IN DOOR NEW THRU GRID WALL, SEE DETAIL A''L.0 CONCRETE TILT PANEL W/FURRING, SEE__ NEW TOILET ROOM WALL, SEE DETAIL_ EXISTING BEARING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW PLUMBING WALL, SEE DETAIL JOB NO. 2130079 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMTTAL- 6/133 m V Men. 11-.-0-1ZIKIAMMIM 13,1 0.0,13 Fco <o 3 a c • v • F A el O ODN C 0 O 2 3 am A tm:o U 7!7 r r v c<: o O All 0 0 n O v l O O Client - - - � � _n,- t=1 - - Ai 1 , W I V......._ , r-- 5 © ��, O 1 7 3 TYP TYP. miml 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8--,'-0- P•oject Lade TENANT NPFlOVEMENT 7556 SW TECH CENTER DR TICIARD,OR F ?. I O Q8 O 0 © 0 C RO PRI ATS RE20 SUMO 1 `NS T ;I���� THE SE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF - Lk -. GROW.NACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO DE JSED DR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. TYP 111M WITHWi PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION C 'xr II . .� \ REVISIONS: , ,Q\ L0EET ■ 9 W 4 Ct O 0 ° 0 0 0 SHEET TITLE: 0 1/8.-1.--o- EAST ELEVATION SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES A. VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL CONDITIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT 1. EXISTING OH DOOR TO REMAIN. DRAM BY:EW OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 2. EXISTING 3'x7'HM DOOR TO REMAIN. PANT ALL NEW WORK TO MATCH B. PAINT, PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS DAMAGED 3. EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW TO REMAIN. EXISTING BULGING SCHEME CHECKED BY:RCT BY NEW WORK TO NEW CONDITION. 4. NEW 9'x10 INSULATED OH DOCK DOOR. C. SAW CUT NEW OPENINGS-DOE07OVEAQIT 5. NEW EDGE OF DOCK LEVELER. SHEET: 6. NEW STOREFRONT WINDOW. SEE SHEET A3.5. 7. NEW 3'x7'STOREFRONT DOOR. & EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR. A3.3 9. /NFL/WALL. 10. NEW RETAINING WALL. 11. SPANDREL GLASS 12. 3'x7'INSULATED HM DOOR. BY PERMIT BUP2013-00063 JOB NO. 21300 100 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL - 4/26/13 lIV7�N�� MOO/1100 wx„wn-+s-a+.W ELI NM/IS um .... rEm r cc co a c1 ;$ om - •SO. y5 g• 1. V..0 8 .. e�a org 11 10 <i> Q7 O 5 4 3 2 1 J ap 4 4 4 I I tw ri s nE, co i g i >0 elf 1 F I �, W < lai5 Oe • v� Cq D iii F1 OS�. de O 1 I Client i ? \ W- - - - - - - \ - 0 o 0 (1. 4 Yer .21 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8'-1'-O• Pro d Lam TENANT 1 IMPROVEMENT CBl1@I DR R 1> <-1> E O EDAM ON 1 1 . .?, 1 ® GRGUP YAOIEMZE 3017 ALL RIGHTS PESERIED THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF GROUP MAOAEM21E NC ARE NOT TO BE USED OR REPROOUCED IN ANY MAWER. RITMOUT PRIOR MITTEN PEPHISS120 K O REVISIONS: \ •1��6 RCO�1 ETA ' F--- - - -- - - / --b o ,L SHEET TITLE: WEST ELEVATION cl;) 1/B•_1•-O• NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES A. VERIFY AND CONFIRM ALL CONDITIONS NOTIFY ARCHITECT 1. EXISTING OH DOOR TO REMAIN. DRAWN BY:ELJ 1 OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 2. EXISTING 3'x7 NM DOOR TO REMAIN. PANT ALL PEW WORK TO MATCH B. PAINT,PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING CONDITIONS DAMAGED 3. EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW TO REMAIN. EpgTNO BU Dt O SCHEME CHECKED BY:RCT BY NEW WORK TO NEW CONDITION. 4. EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR. , C. SAW CUT NEW OPENINGS-00 NOT 011110.1r 5. NEW 3'x7 HM DOOR. SHEET: B. NEW CONCRETE STAIR. 7. HANDRAIL SEE DETAIL 7/A8.2 BY PERMIT BUP2013-00083 FOR FEFERENCE ONLY A3.4 JOB NO. 21300I9.00 MAJOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL- 4/264_,.._3 0. EU«„/13 tAm 1.101111 • • c DT E :S El yv CI X_ ,• 8'-0• 2•6 TOP PLATE • - W N //�� • _Y_ _ G►+�eh E91L+t; , 8x8 CEDAR _`.�_�1'C1rj8yE�yM;owe Mlff�*roP • POST. TYP. PANEL o --_ PROVIDE FOR STAGGERED C �____�_' ;�-.- ;` CANE BOLTS T GA 1x6 CEDAR t I < J <O'OPEN'POSITIr .I `�\ g. e o ` BOIJ-ARD CANE ,- AT CATS ; i U u u U,• ���1'-0.8 FOOTNG.EMBED i g In 4 - o , TION I I it L 8%6 POST 1'-8•MIN c q 1'� SCREEN WALL ELEVATION IS . n MOW l�VlYlra�.► e •Ti • /i.�rri w irre. j/�i O a 0■6 o NO f - \-- r",' /'•./ :///� +r-x.61\1 ("ML C pp N i / l / %/ .-. ' `•i +/ N s SAME PER 3/Aa8 W'•+• �; 0 'Y f © _ ' ' 2�0• I r/-o. A a 50 _ fff��� BAR ^ ROD r'/A&e t' U OD 1 J 6 ID -":I I �� EXISTING ._ - II`,• 1---� i' . • APPROXIMATE 20'X8' FOOTING 1aB CEDAR BATS I CARDBOARq COMPACTOR. O o z o ':11111101111111111111111111111111!11111111.11�IIliII'II �I ATM 0.0 Client I VERIFY SIZE WITH PROVIDER. ��CONTACT JASON JACKOLA AT --OVIOE HOLES FOR _ j I MESSCO 503-289-2360 CANE BOLTS AT GATE —NEW FOOTING o I I DATE POST PER 3/AB.B LLJ 'OPEN'POSITION TYPICAL I I i • APPROXIMATE 30'X8' i I I l I CARDBOARD COMPACTOR. J•/ VERIFY SIZE WITH PROVIDER. O PLAN O GATE ELEVATION or . CONTACT JASON JACKQLA AT we-ssco 503-289-2360 TRASH COMPACTOR SCREEN FENCE - III I I/8' 1-0l i�' t F I -_ _ MELDED ■ / -G / \\ CAP TYP * 3/16 17 / /18r . FASTENERS Y ROD PER I \ • / I\ I I e. /!`\ 4/A8.6 / \ T$3x3xJ� AIDE 2x NAILER Project T I \\ _ I l\ I , 1 -.L�-I TUBE FRAME �• a)(•x REQUIRED , Net NW / // \ r TURNBUCKLE .0 1•8 CEDAR SLATS AT B•O.C. ■ /.. // ��. HSS TUBE c I I'I' \ ' i/ BRACING c I ex� t41111111 II 7366 SW TECH DEWIER DR NINCE III "I CANE BOLT FOR EACH LEAF T�FiD.�MI "-' Ili PAIR 6 x 6 CLEVES i;., NELDED H VICES HACAR kr- „ i„,,,�— .-_ics-�� C _ 1850 LP OR EQUAL�j.� GATE PER PAINT TO MATCH GATE `� •� !Hilt DETAIL 4/A8.8 f c n 2'� • ASPHALT PAVING �t G TIIOLN5011 y �`_` 1 `�= ._� iipJi 1 (3)#3 TIES•4 O. ! - • •i /Il/ + :mac-. �3 TIES o r o.c. 1 'Y9"uF'0 9 WIIn 2'-6• FOOTING PIPE SLEEVE-EMBED 4”DEEP _-______ GAtl YACAFNZIC 2015 ALL,,,v5 GE ezt /� TRASH GATE POST a©GATE SECTION DID °IADINZ" E PROPERTY T O a "�i SITE PLAN 30A YAIXEY_E"q ARE N01 TO BC VYD OR REPROOVCF➢xl MY YANNCA. $ -0• 3/4•�t'-0' f 1/2"-1'-0" Y7THOUT RR:')4 w41irE�+PERMISSION RE�VI{{SIONS• E Tall, CORN DATE TA 1 IN PROGRESS SHEET TITLE: SCREEN DETALS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SHEET:A8.8 . JOB NO. 2/3007900 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE -9/3/13 un-a-ems w e,.v.re tt 11,1 . TIGARD City of Tigard November 28, 2016 Steve Tuttle Mackenzie River East Center 1515 SE Water Avenue#100 Portland, OR 97214 RE: Landscaping Performance Bond No. 9127171 for LaCie Ltd. (SDR2013-00003) Dear Mr. Tuttle: With your letter dated November 15, 2016 (M. Project No. 2150603.00) the City of Tigard releases in full the Landscaping Performance Bond No. 9127171 for LaCie Ltd. (SDR2013-00003) in the amount of$9,333 effective November 15, 2016. If you have any questions please call me at 503-718-2434. Regards, Gary Pagenstecher,AIICP CUD Associate Planner City of Tigard 503-718-2434 garypatigard-or.gov Attachment: Bond No. 9127171 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Cent thwt4-7 Bond No. 9127171 LANDSCAPING PERFORMANCE&ESTABLISHMENT BOND LaCie,Ltd.,as principal ("Principal") , and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , a corporation authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon,as surety ("Surety"),are jointly and several bound to the City of Tigard,an Oregon municipal corporation as obligee ("City"),in the sum of $9,333.00 to assure compliance with the City of Tigard Urban Forestry effective canopy and tree establishment requirements and Clean Water Services water quality requirements. Principal is obligated to provide landscaping (minimum effective tree canopy and water quality swale plantings) and meet establishment periods as set out in the approved plans and conditions of approval of City of Tigard Casefile: LaCie,Ltd. Site Development Review (SDR2013- 00003). In the event Principal fails to complete required plantings or meet establishment requirements,Surety shall pay the fee-in-lieu on written demand by the City,up to the full amount of this bond. Surety's total obligation shall not exceed$9,333.00. On full and satisfactory completion of Principal's obligations under the site development approval, City shall release this bond. The City shall have 90 days from notice from Principal that the obligation has been completed to verify compliance with the site development approval and release the bond. The City shall have no obligation to release the bond if Principal has not fully complied with the site development approval. In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond,in addition to all other rights and remedies, the City,in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 17th day of October ,20 13 . LaCie Ltd. Principal By: D;■rt (3?- (Tide) (A true copy of the Power of Attorney must be attached to the original of this bond). Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Sur_e_ty n _ Marsh USA Inc Attorney in Fact Tara W. Mealer 1111 Northshore Dr., Ste. N-550, Knoxville, TN 37919 Address ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,a corporation of the State of New York,the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,a corporation of the State of Maryland,and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Maryland (herein collectively called the "Companies"), by JAMES M. CARROLL, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By-Laws of said Companies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof,do hereby nominate, constitute,and appoint Mary Y. VOLMAR,Vicki NOBINGER,Sandra WARD,Loretta M.JONES,Carolyn E.WHEELER,Novetta M.ANDERSON, Kellie A.TURNER,Brian W.MCCARTER and Tara W.MEALER,all of Knoxville,Tennessee, EACH its true and lawful agent and Attorney-in-Fact,to make,execute,seal and deliver,for,and on its behalf as surety,and as its act and deed:any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Companies, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York,New York.,the regularly elected officers of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V,Section 8,of the By-Laws of said Companies,and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Vice-President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,this 4th day of September,A.D.2013. ATTEST: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND Nst,. � SIP `l ONO _8 74'D ' a � +° +`•t B jn5 rrr 1,.. na1 A. }U ' g "Nt, S toN%� 3 . /104.425.- Assistant Secretary Vice President Gregory E.Murray James M. Carroll State of Maryland City of Baltimore On this 4th day of September,A.D.2013,before the subscriber,a Notary Public of the State of Maryland,duly commissioned and qualified,JAMES M. CARROLL,Vice President,and GREGORY E. MURRAY,Assistant Secretary, of the Companies,to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument,and acknowledged the execution of same,and being by me duly sworn,deposeth and saith, that he/she is the said officer of the Company aforesaid,and that the seals affixed to the preceding instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies,and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. o,,,unn,,,, , .: ; "••:`.:any ..,. , Co. Q.49.w^-nom .....,:...,,,,,o)....:::-,:: Constance A.Dunn,Notary Public My Commission Expires:July 14,2015 POA-F 164-0014A EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V,Section 8,Attorneys-in-Fact. The Chief Executive Officer,the President,or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys-in-fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizances, stipulations,undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney-in-fact to affix the corporate seal thereto;and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate;and I do further certify that Article V,Section 8,of the By-Laws of the Companies is still in force. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attorney...Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 10th day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice-President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company,whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company,shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this fl-1v‘day of cr Aober ,20 13 • 0.a etp0+.� o►� • v+�atts s =z � (BRAN Ito k ,...::..ot4 well dtze:er Geoffrey Delisio,Vice President LACIE made fior ideas To whom it may concern POWER OF ATTORNEY I undersigned, Philippe SPRUCH, director of LaCie Ltd and legal representative of LaCie S.A., hereby authorise Melissa CAHILL in her capacity as finance manager for the following : FINANCES & LEGAL • Negotiate, sign, change or terminate, in the limits of the social aims of the company, all commercial businesses and all commercial contracts with the company's suppliers and sign all documents as long as the amount of each operation is less than 1.000.000 USD. There is no amount limit for all operations between LaCie Ltd and LaCie S.A. • Represent the company with all the local country's administrations, more particularly the fiscal administration, sign all declarations, pay all taxes, duties, penalty and fees, make all relevant demand for tax exemption. • Take legal action and represent the company in front of all appropriate courts. • Employ professional and business assistance as may be appropriate, including attorneys and accountants. • Make all payments and declarations concerning employees. Melissa CAHILL shall not be liable for any loss that results from a judgment error that was made in good faith. However, he shall be liable for wilful misconduct or the failure to act in good faith while acting under the authority of this Power of Attorney. This Power of Attorney shall become effective immediately, revokes any and all general powers of attorney previously signed, and may be revoked at any time providing written notice. Nothing in this Power of Attorney shall be construed as a limitation of LaCie internal policies and guidelines. LaCie internal policies and guidelines prevail this Power of Attorney. Paris, Novemb- 18`h 2011 Philippe SP414• Melissa CAHILL �� ajyt-ti-hwi #* STATIONARY` SOLID WASTE COMPACTOR APPLICATION/PERMIT CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location: 7555 SW Tech Center Drive --._–_—___ _ , Tigard,OR 97223 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map& Tax Lot#(s) 2S101DC4500 Case No: C 13 -CCaj Business Name: LaCie,LTD Receipt No. ��-7j Application Ac pted By: K- Applicant*:__LaCie,LTD Date. 91 2.3-1 [� Address:_ 22985 NW Evergreen Parkway l Row.11/8/20 02 City/State: Hillsboro,OR Zip: 97214 rtcurpin5masterstreviaedtsolid waste compactor app doc Primary Contact. Melissa Cahill Phone: Fax: Property Owner/Deed Holders)*: (Attach list ti more than one) –— — Summit Properties,Inc. Attn:Yoshio Kurosaki REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted Address:_5550 SW Macadam,Suite 205 _Phone: (503)227-0887„ without the required submittal elements) City/State: Portland,OR Zip: 97239 ,Application Form *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant 2' owner's Signature/Written Authorization must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written p Copy of Solid Waste Hauler Service authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner, The owner(s) roviderlCompatibility Letter must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Site/Plot Plan indicating the following: i 1. Location of the compactor APPROVAL CRITERIA 2. Maneuvering distance showing the I compactor can be picked up, The applicant shall demonstrate that: transported& returned by the I franchisee 1. The compactor is compatible with the franchisee's hauling 3. If applicable, receptacles at the same equipment (attach letter from solid waste hauler); location as the stationary compactor 2. The proposed site plan provides adequate maneuvering for separated recyclable materials to distances for the franchisee hauler's equipment and maintains be collected &transported by the adequate and safe access for all other vehicles and pedestrians franchisee,and as required by local, state, or federal laws; 4. All buildings, parking areas,fences 3 The compactor and applicant can comply with any federal, and major landscaping features. state, and local health, safety and environmental regulations [Filing Fee I $1 including, but not limited to OAR 437-02-242; and this section; --_____, __________ _ _ (Continued on back) CITY OF TIGARD Approved _ ._ rr • Conditionally Approved. _ [ ) For only the wo•r-�,,�s described in: 1 PERMIT NO.S L2DI ;-CCC'O( see Letter to:Follow. _..-[ ] Attach [ r Job A•drew 1593 ' • _:j Cy eh. .I 7:1,1 j- nRta: p i 4. Adequate opportunity for recycling has been provided and the area where the franchise collects separated recyclable materials is at central locations accessible to the franchisee's hauling equipment; 5. The compactor can adequately serve the purpose for which it is installed,including: • Able to hold all wastes generated by the permittee; • Accessible, and easy for the permittee and its tenants and employees to insert waste into the compactor in a safe manner; + Safety measures to prevent unauthorized or accidental operation,or attraction to minors; and + Sanitary and tight design to prevent waste from leakage, dropping, blowing, or otherwise escaping from the compactor or unauthorized removal of waste from the compactor. 6. The compactor shall be located outside of any required building setback areas and (or) required buffered areas as required by the applicable zoning district and related Community Development Code or Municipal Code Standards. OPERATIONAL STANDARDS At all times, the applicant and the compactor shall remain in compliance with the following requirements: • Compliance with any applicable federal, state, and local health, safety and environmental regulations including, but not limited to OAR 437-02-242 and the City's Solid Waste Management Codes(Chapter 11.04); + The compactor and surrounding area will be kept clean at all times; + The compactor will undergo regular preventive maintenance and adequate emergency maintenance shall be available; + The compactor and operation of the compactor shall remain in compliance with all representations made in the application for and the permit issued for the operation;and + There will be no operation of the compactor between the hours of 9:00 PM and 7:00 AM. SAFETY No stationary compactor or the other container for multi-family residential,commercial or industrial use shall exceed the safe loading design limit or operation of the collection vehicles provided by the franchisee serving the area. SIGN Each container shall be clearly labeled with the name, address, and telephone number of the permittee, and the name of the contact person. HEALTH Compactors containing putrescible waste shall be emptied at least weekly. REIMBURSEMENT FOR FINES Permittees shall reimburse the franchisee for any fines incurred by the franchisee for weight or environmental violations, or any other violation caused by the ownership,operation, or use of the compactor. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I hereby certify that I have read and understand the above conditions and standards as they apply to Stationary Solid Waste Compactors. I acknowledge that this compactor approval may be revoked if the above conditions have not or are being conducted in a manner contrary to the Solid Waste Management Chapter of the Tigard Municipal Code,Chapter 11.04. SIGNATURES DATED this �T \ day of \ki\,1 , 20 1 3 Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Approved By Date 2 I rh011)4 O W C < C O O-an 0. O, �e «n «D O O O 6x6 CEDAR 6'-0' YA'6 TOP PLATE 2.4 D op or _ POST, TYP. 1 PANEL f ' 'e•,/� `�/- CDNC•41E k:FA!�'.fV,l 1EIN e'C / < J -��— WDAF A 6A41 a':'> PROVIDE H.ES FOR STAGGERED I _ �_�'� CANE 80LT5 7 GAjE 1x6 CEDAR T I ; I.-- - 'OPEN'POSITIr $n 1 � c o II /► �I`1 ` PROVIDE MOLES FOR I u > u u 4---...L14.1 c > ''\ I BOLLARD CANE BOLTS AT GATE ° 1'-0'f FOOTING, EMBED e e 8 / r- i 5 'CLOSED'POSITION ev �- I 6X6 POST 1'-6"MIN DELL. OWL< O OSCREEN WALL ELEVATION - K m tO \ ��� p I / /,�/ !� \\ VA' H55 FRAME PER 3/A8.8 • W 0 ° e N 1 �_ //il / //�/. / e i .. I © .f`7 --- maoo \ I `r V 2.-0-AR •-11.__ I___. -- EIt R' ROD PER 3/A8-8 CD U tit= a.' -�1 I / O FOOTING , [rr i I I 1x6 CEDAR SLATS awn, }/ • • APPROXIMATE 20'X8' `, I m II�IIIII�I�IIIIIIIIIIiII:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I Ai 6"O . / CARDBOARD.COMPAC�R o= 1/ VERIFY SIZE WITH PROVIDER. I CONTACT JASON -23RD A A7 PROVIDE HOLES FOR .Sy -- - - WESSCO 503-289-2360 CANE BOLTS AT GATE NEW FOOTING o I GATE POST PER 3/A8.8 Lil '� I 'OPEN'POSITION TYPICAL •Ito J ® / CARDBOARD COMPACTOR. PLAN O GATE ELEVATION VERIFY SIZE WITH PROVIDER. O i4 // CONTACT JASON JACKQLA AT Y WESSCO 503-289-2360 TRASH COMPACTOR SCREEN FENCE 1 I.f�l t/8 1-0• j - WELDED 3/16 x I '\ \\ CAP GYP /16I P.I FASTENERS la / • ( EiiC _ •"\ 4%A8P8 / I■I \I/ % �, I L-- 1 TUBE FAME\ I �* - I lCfs'TENANT 4 x =I I I' \\ 1 / )6'R00 AND L 7x6 CEDAR SLATS AT 6'O.C. LIPROVELIENT I'I • TURNBUCKLE p �.1 II ...IM // //� �,.iiii,jxll� G` ♦ i2 BRACING r / 1 ,. ;L —,a 1- l yt• 7716 OR CE3RER DR 7"' I •CANE BOLT FOR EACH LEAF - / / '1/4\, HINGE I 1m PAIR 6 x 6 CLEKS k-. WELDED HINGES HAGAR • 1850 LP OR EQUAL. ■:' ` tit>_.�_ �' ■� GATE PER PAINT TO MATCH GATE ��;; DETAIL 4/AB.B 1 [ASPHALT PAVING ------j o (3)N TIES• s'O.C. Il �' i � F------=-17."---->c---"--"s—s"---------"."------------------------ M I o 'r /J TIES• O.C. (s)M VERT. — 2,-6• FOOTING PIPE SLEEVE-EMBED 1'DEEP ® �It T5 Dp ERf5fP 4f5 X T1fSt DRAYNC.S AYE 11(PROPCRiY Of s TRASH GATE POST MDR YAC 1,1(9 A�N A AD,1O DE /� SITE PLAN a GATE SECTION USED OR REPRODOCEO:N AVIV AISSIN' ■ 3/4=t' A8.8 1 1/2'=r-D KTNO t PRICY IRIiiEN EAYISS OV A8.8 - 3C'-0' A8.8 REVISIONS: A,HnNO6 REVISION DELTA ,S-■11415 CLOSING DATE eN 5..T 1 IN PROGRESS SHEET TITLE: TRASH .SCREEN DETALS RAM 1 BY: — D CHECKED BY: SHEET: _� A8.8 :00 NO. 21100 ls� PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE — 9/3/13 MAW=�„w7evAry/,,., „Po cocittimi#10 111 p* R* I * D * E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 September 6, 2013 Erica Jankowski Group Mackenzie 1515 SE Water Ave#100 Portland, OR 97214 Re: LaCie at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr We have reviewed the updated site plan for the compactor area at 7555 SW Tech Center Dr in Tigard. The compactor are has adequate space for straight on access for our trucks to access the compactors. The compactors will sit parallel to the north side of the building, with access facing to the west and east. This placement will be acceptable to ensure our access of the compactors. The enclosure added to the drawing received 8/31/13 shows gates on both the east and west side of the enclosure. Both gates are 25'4"wide with full swing gates. These gates will work for us to access each compactor. Please make sure there are cane bolts and holes for the gates to be held in the open and closed positions. If you have any questions,feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kristin Leichner Pride Disposal Co. (503) 625-6177 Icristinl@pridedisposal.com PROVIDE H. S FOR 4x4 CEDAR 6'-0' 216 TOP PLATE POST, TYP. PANEL CANE BOLTS •T GA STAGGERED OPEN' POSIT!.4,'000 1x8 CEDAR �'' ,I O . / \ / I III oz o III I - � �I III III IIIII IIIII I IIII III IIIII PROVIDE H S FOR 'CLOSED'BOLTS-AT WON uIi ii '' .19) O i O SCREEN WALL ELEVATION Li /' ®Irk 2 4' I HSS FRAME PER 0 o 1/,1111111111111111111111I1 111111111111111"11 lI I � . . i4 I � ROD PER 1x6 CEDAR SLATS AT 6' PROVIDE HOLES FOR ° CANE BOLTS AT CATE i I I 'OPEN' POSITION `t L J L J GATE POST PER OPLAN ^ GATE ELEVATION TRASH COMPACTOR SCREEN FENCE 1/8' - 1'-0'z i MACKENZIE . DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED November 15, 2016 City of Tigard Attention:Gary Pagenstecher 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LaCie Tree Inspection and Bond Release Project Number 2150603.00 Site Development Review:SDR2013-00003 Dear Gary: Pursuant to Section 11, Part 2 of the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual, Mackenzie visited the LaCie site at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard, Oregon, on October 26th and verified the recent installation, health, and characteristics of the two approved Zelkova serrata trees that had not been planted at the time of the previous bond release inspection on November 25th,2015. Since that time,two Zelkova serrata'City Sprite'trees have been planted in the location indicated on the plans. These newly installed trees are well branched and no health issues were noted. Irrigation is provided to each tree. No other issues were noted with the twelve previously planted trees. Sincerely, // " / . - Tuttle, LA •• Enclosure(s): L2.1;LaCie Tree Inspection and Bond Release Dec. 1, 2015 c: Michael Ross—Seagate Technology Suzannah Stanley—Mackenzie IM ? 503.224.9560 • F 503.228.1285 • W MCKNZE.COM • RiverEast Center,1515 SE Water Avenue,#100,Portland,OR 97214 ARCHITECTURE • INTERIORS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ ortland,Oregon • Vancouver,Washington • Seattle,Washington H:\Projects\215060300\6_Final\LTR-City of Tigard-Tree Inspection and Bond Release-161115.docx 4 MACKENZIE . DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED December 1, 2015 City of Tigard Attention:John Floyd, Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: LaCie Tree Inspection and Bond Release Project Number 2150603.00 Site Development Review:SDR2013-00003 Dear John: Pursuant to Section 11, Part 2 of the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual, I visited the LaCie site at 7555 SW Tech Center Drive in Tigard, Oregon, on November 25th and observed the health and characteristics of the trees planted at the time of the project tenant improvement. All trees appear to be in good health and are establishing well.The trees are well branched and no health issues were noted. Most trees had shed all of their leaves for the fall, but the form and bark of the trees were in satisfactory condition.At this time it would be appropriate and advisable to remove all tree stakes and guy wires from the trees. It was noted that there was a missing tree in the southern planting island adjacent to SW Tech Center Drive as indicated on the Plan Review Response drawing dated September 3, 2013. Additionally, there was one pine tree in the eastern planting island near the front door where a zelkova had been proposed on the plans. The pine tree was 8" DBH and pre- existed the site improvements associated with this project. It was in good condition. Sincerely, 0•17A e•-• even Tuttle, PLA Enclosure: Photo Report c: Michael Ross—Seagate Technology MP 503.224.9560 • F 503.228.1285 • W MCKNZE.COM • RiverEast Center,1515 SE Water Avenue,#100,Portland,OR 97214 ARCHITECTURE • INTERIORS • STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND USE PLANNING • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ Portland,Oregon • Vancouver,Washington • Seattle,Washington H:\Projects\215060300\6_Final\LTR-City of Tigard-Tree Inspection and Bond Release-151201.docx MACKENZI E . 503.224.9560 • I- 503.228.1285 • V MCKNZE.COM PHOTO REPORT RiverEast Center,1515 SE Water Avenue,#100,Portland,OR 97214 Waslu;,.,r. .. PROJECT NUMBER: 2150603.00 ISSUE DATE: December 1, 2015 PROJECT NAME: LaCie SUBJECT: Tree Inspection and Bond Release(November 25,2015) IP .. ; 11116111/4 • , . .,;-%,.... . #4111111- ... A -! - : - , .4wt 40,.. ,,,,ft..4 , .i. : ,,-.. i , ..,, .,. _ ... ,,, , i tlisx, -,v, , '-. Z kVA f . f .4. ,. .-. ..,:10(4' . --- et LL,,'' 1.`d'� �yi .ryy t' 4 i� �'S"' }T r Fe: i n .., ,,,,, n ..,,,. ,,_, , , . ,, , ''ax, ' ... ..,. ' A*,' . .-Afr, ,. ., Ste. ,. 1.,1 ' -- :, ;.... Missing tree at parking island near Tech Center Existing pine tree in parking island near entry Drive H:\Projects\215060300\6_Final\PR-City of Tigard-Tree Inspection and Bond Release-151201.docx p 03 cc 90 p o mwa �v 'om •0 0G.1 N PLANT MATERIAL SCFEDULE :t.)-i,C SYMBOL # BOTANICAL NAME- SIZE/ <S-1 COMMON NAME SPACING ;W w TREES mr P O p ..� 4 EXISTING SCOTCH PINE STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN p c 1- c E C U 1 co ov O i r - p�mat • 7 EXISTING RED MAPLE STREET TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN m c d 4 ca - n62 c N c 1 EXISTING CAPITAL PEAR TREE TO REMAIN AS SHOWN C :III !tb-^—^.....,..._.".....-,..........-.......-,.._...„_„,..._.", W U I-J a A 14 ZELKOVA SERRATA AS SHOWN 7ZELKOVA CINMt ' �" /� _ 80 BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA 'GREEN BEAUTY 1 GAL. CONT. 1 ,'a� • grA GREEN BEAUTY BOXWOOD AS SHOWN I ' y' 103 GSPIREAOLDFL X BULIALDA'GOLDFLAME' 1 GAL. CONT. i t '�/ ori • GOLDFLAME SPIREA AS SHOWN i °O"/ EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN A$SHOWN Yer %; f L,c__ .1 :!nr °S„ r, f /:i'% 166 ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 1 GAL. CONT. 1i MAN DOOR f %;i;; KINNIKINNICK 21 O.C. �1 F L6Ck TENANT MAN DOOR-�J : 1.805 SF LAWN-SUNIJARKCSEEDSATION SEED MIX OELBS./1,000 SF �IIVEMENr 01!--, { ° (F%/ WATER QUALITY SWALE-PER CWS 8 AGER CIRCINATUM 2 GAL. CONT. 7656 SW TECH CENTER DR ® C:'� O VINE MAPLE AS SHOWN/ Tom'OR 22 RIBES SANGUINEUM 1 GAL. CONT ' EXISTING GRAVEL � o RED FLOWERING CURRANT MIN.SHOWS/ LOT 1 `, 0 17 CORNUS SERICEA MINA. CONT, ( , I m RED-OSIER DOGWOOD AS SHOWN 1.0". i/// .:D 1,410 JUNCOS PATEN$ PLUGS R SF 1 Farad. SPREADING F. Y1N�H1 6" I EXISTING BUILDING �....'...,,,_, 778 SF FREEBOARD AREA SEED MIX SEED V050 / -DWARF TALLFESCUE E3 120 LBS./ACRE �IP � -DWARF PERENNIAL RYE 30x i I - COLONIAL BENT- CREEPING RED FGRASS 5%ESCUE Z ;L� - COLONIAL BENT GRASS 55 ^�' IY ' CROUP YACKEN2iE 2013 ;5 A 0TYR ' O f_ ��. � v '1 .411! ® ILL RIdITS RESER`.W THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF tT I MAN '- r I CROUP MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT 10 BE la? n;., ��m / GENERAL MOTES USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER. - - a ij WITHOUT PRIOR MRITIEN PERMISSION , 1BSAA. 51 OP I 9 1. FULLY AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED TO MAINTAIN 1 �ae i � I / ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. REVISIONS: 2. PROVIDE 1/4 INCH HEMLOCK BARK MULCH A7 A DEPTH OF 2 INCHES THROUGHOUT ler' NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS, EXCEPT STORMWATER FACILITY. m�R1A06 REVISION DELTA I L IoJ j Mu+DOOR MAN DOOR_,�AI 3. SEE CIVIL SHEET C8.2 FOR WATER QUALITY SWALE DETAIL le SHEET MS CLOSING DATE AO g'' ?k,'..-.11:6b .•BA`D0�BAY UOORgAy pppq Bar DOOR MAN DOOR �0 00 ,,, 1 X •IN PROGRESS / Ilik_S i�°�01�p� '':r.. KEYNOTES 0 �o ::::� � .g � � 1. BIKE RACK- SEE CIVIL ' yiyl{ NW �-�_' 2. CONCRETE SPLASH PAD- SEE CIVIL TYPO ' OF N' Doo' ___ _--_-- ��` I 1 SITE COVERAGE DATA SHEET TITLE: 1 LANDSCAPE A � EXISTING CONDITION FINAL CONDITION PLAN / TOTAL SITE AREA: 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) 217,960 SF (5.00 AC) A LANDSCAPE AREA: 61,803 SF (1.40 AC) 63,185 SF (1.45 AC) (29.0S) Jab. i •0•7", _.. . '/ , �// �- / / j/%/ �/ / R '• DRAM BY:TEB A e . _ ___ " CHECKED BY:RML 30 0 15 30 60 120 SHEET: SW TECH CENTER DR � ,IN FEET> L2.1 1 Inch= 90 0.. G -ti1��-- • ®LANDSCAPE PLAN ..- -- SCALE: 1'- 30' ` /�/�' JOB N0. /�AG W79.W F7 PLAN REVIEW RESPONSE -9/3/13