Loading...
SDR1999-00010 SDR1999 - 0001O PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00010 CITY OFTIGARD Community'Development PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP sfiapingji Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/11/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP Site Development Review SDR1999-00010 SLR1999-00008 VAR1999-00026 VAR1999-00027 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to build a 44 space parking lot, and a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building to serve the existing development. Sensitive Lands Review approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that have slopes in excess of 25%. Two Adjustments have also been requested. The first adjustment is to the maximum allowable parking spaces to allow for additional parking and the second adjustment is to reduce the number of street trees due to slopes along the street. APPLICANT: Progressive Insurance OWNER: Progressive Casualty Insurance 7150 SW Sandburg Road 6300 Wilson Mills Road Tigard, OR 97223 Mayfield, OH 44143 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial District; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L; Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. LOCATION: 7150 SW Sandburg Road; WCTM 2S101 DC, Tax Lot 03900 and 04100. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, REVIEW 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790 and 18.810. CRITERIA: SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 1 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE STAFF CONTACT IS MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER IN THE PLANNING DIVISION AT 503-639-4171.) Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 317) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant will be required to submit a revised site plan showing designated pedestrian pathways between parking lots and buildings. Pathways will need to be designated as pathways and cannot double as parking stalls. 2. Provide documentation showing future connection to adjacent parking lots, or evidence that connection is not feasible. 3. Prior to issuance of site development or building permits, the applicant will be required to submit documentation of type and amount of ground cover to be planted between SW 72' Avenue and the private drive. 4. Before a building permit will be issued, a tree protection plan and fencing will need to be erected on site. 5. A revised site plan shall be provided to indicate that wheel stops will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. 6. The applicant shall provide the following: tree mitigation plan for 24 caliper inches; pay the fee in-lieu of payment or post a bond to ensure planting of the mitigation trees; record a deed restriction for those trees that are to be preserved; submit an arborist report providing recommended tree protection measures; and construct the recommended tree protection measures for the trees to be preserved prior to commencement of construction. (The deed restriction may be removed or may be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die, or be determined to be a hazardous tree by a certified Arborist.) Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 7. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the sidewalk and street trees on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five 5) copies of a proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 8. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporation entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 2 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 9. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 72nd Avenue as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; and C. driveway apron. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11. The applicant shall provide a detailed lighting plan prior to the issuance of building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements. 13. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 14. All improvements shall be made in accordance with the approved plans. Submit to the Building Division (Jim Funk, 639-4171, ext. 390) for review and approval: 15. Retaining walls greater than 48 feet in height must be designed by an engineer. 16. The Wall of the maintenance building that is within 20 feet of property line shall be 1-hour fire resistant. 17. Roof drains shall connect to the storm drain system. 18. Provide a fire hydrant within 250 feet of the proposed maintenance shop. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 3 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A 5,752 square foot office building was permitted in 1991 to be added on to the existing office building through a major modification. No other development has occurred to date. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road. The parcel of land is located on the south side of SW Sandburg Road. The subject site and the land surrounding the site are located in the I-L Zone. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes a 44-space parking lot, a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building and an associated storm water quality facility to treat run-off from the newly created impervious surface. The applicant is requesting additional parking for 250 on-site workers and approximately 10 visitors in the building at any one time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: Section 18.360.030.A provides that Site Development Review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. In compliance with Section 18.390.040, a pre-application conference was held on 11/06/98. An application for Site Development Review was submitted on 6/16/99 and subsequently deemed complete on 7/15/99. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision was given, as required by Section 18.390.040.C. The relevant approval criteria are addressed below with respect to the factual information provided by the applicant and are the basis for this Director's decision. Section 18.360.090 states that the Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this Title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code;18.360, Site Development Review; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.530, Industrial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.775, Sensitive Lands, 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters;18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 4 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Impact Study: Section 18.39O.O4O.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. An impact study was not required because Progressive Insurance is not intensifying the use, only adding additional parking to serve it's current needs. Therefore, they will not be increasing the impact on public facilities. Variances and Adjustments- Chapter 18.370: This section provides standards for the granting of variances from the applicable zoning requirements of this title where it can be shown that, owing to special and unusual circumstances related to a specific property, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zone would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship, except that no use variances shall be granted. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to two code requirements. The first adjustment is to allow an increase to the maximum parking requirements. The second adjustment is to waive the street tree requirement along SW 72nd Avenue. Parking adjustment and standards. The individual characteristics of the use at that location requires more parking than is generally required for a use of this type and intensity; Progressive Insurance employs 250 on-site workers and has approximately 10 visitors in the building at any one time. The applicant's business is unique in it's higher than average employee density/intensity than typical general office uses. The need for additional parking cannot be reasonably met through provision of on-street parking or shared parking with adjacent or nearby uses; Adjacent parking lots to the north are at their capacity and cannot offset the need for 44 additional spaces. The site plan shall indicate how the additional parking can be redeveloped to more intensive transit-supportive use in the future. The applicant's narrative states that the location of the proposed parking lot could be used as a building pad in the future if parking demands decrease due to increased modes of public transportation. FINDING: As noted above, the proposed parking lot could be converted into a more intensive transit-supportive use, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 5 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Adjustment for street tree requirements: Section 18.390.030 states that the Director shall approve with conditions, or deny a request for the adjustments to the street tree requirements in Section 18.745.030, based on the following criteria: If the location of a proposed tree would cause potential problems with existing utility lines, if the tree would cause visual clearance problems; or if there is not adequate space in which to plant street trees. The applicant is proposing to not plant street trees on a portion of the lot adjacent to SW 72' Avenue however, 7 street trees are being planted at the south end of the lot. If the applicant were required to perform grading to allow for street trees, the process would conflict with sensitive land issues by increasing impact to soils, therefore there is no space for street trees of the north portion of the lot. FINDING: Because of the grading and sensitive land issues with the site, the criteria of the above section are satisfied. Use Classification- Chapter 18.530: The applicant is proposing to add an additional parking lot for employees. This use is classified in Code Section 18.130 as a major modification to the I-L light industrial zone. The applicant is proposing to build a 44-space parking lot and a 20 x 25 maintenance building. A parking lot and accessory structure in the I-L zone is permitted as a major modification and subject to site development review. TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P I-L I-H Minimum Lot Size None None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a -- public or private street Maximum Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5] 85 % 85 % Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] 15 % 15% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 6 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.O5OB are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. Comparing the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the I-L zone, the zone has no minimum lot size requirement. The minimum lot width is 50 feet. The required front yard setback is 30 feet, no other setbacks are required. Maximum site coverage is 85 percent and minimum landscaping requirements call for 15 percent. • FINDING: The applicant's narrative addresses the dimensional standards and the plans show that the site has a 270 foot front yard setback., no other setbacks are required. The applicant has indicated that 70 percent of the site is impervious, leaving 30 percent for landscaping. Therefore this criterion has been met. Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: Walkways: Section 18.7O5.03O.F. states that walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan indicates that a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area is to be constructed. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; The proposal is an industrial development; therefore, this standard does not apply. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The only improvement subject to the regulations of this section is for improved pedestrian walkways. The applicant is proposing a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area. FINDING: Where the stairway connecting the proposed parking area with the existing parking is proposed, a stripped walkway will be required, thus eliminating the two parking spaces at the entrance and exit of the stairway. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 7 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. FINDING: A lighting plan for the proposed walkway connecting the proposed parking lot and the existing lots are not needed. Therefore this standard has been met. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The driveway access pavement width is 24 feet and because parking is already available within 50 feet of the building entrance, the 50-foot rule does not apply. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one- way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The applicant is not proposing one-way traffic, therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.705.030.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The only improvement subject to the regulations of this section is for improved pedestrian walkways. The applicant is proposing a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant does not show appropriate pedestrian walkway crossing from the parking lot to the building. The proposed stairway connecting the proposed parking lot to the existing lot empties into a vehicle stall. The applicant also has not addressed the possibility of connecting with parking areas on adjacent lots. Therefore, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. If applicant complies with the conditions below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: • Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan showing designated pedestrian pathways between parking lots and buildings. Pathways will need to be designated as pathways and cannot double as parking stalls. ♦ Provide documentation showing future connection to adjacent parking lots, or evidence that connections are not feasible. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 8 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street Trees: Section 18.745.O4O.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.04O.C. Section 18.745.O4O.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: • Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant states in the narrative that the project fronts on SW 72' Avenue for a distance greater than 100 feet. The project also contains an existing driveway that is in excess of 100 feet in length. The applicant is requesting a landscaping adjustment due to the sensitive lands associated with the site, which staff has approved previously in this decision, therefore, this standard does not apply. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.O5O.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of- way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned I-L and surrounding property is zoned C-P. According to the above-referenced matrices, development of parking lots in the I-L zoning districts does not require buffering and screening from other uses in the C-P zoning classification. Therefore, this criterion is met. Screening: Special Provisions Section 18.745.O5O.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 9 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed parking area is 42 spaces, the applicant is proposing to provide 6 parking lot trees in curbed planters. FINDING: The site plan shows one tree for every seven parking spaces. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Section 18.745.050.E.2. states that any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. The proposed parking lot will not contain a refuse container or service facility, therefore, this criterion does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.745, Buffering and Screening have been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading Location: Section 18.765.030.B. states that off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building: FINDING: The proposed parking lot is not a residential use. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. General Provisions Section 18.765.030.a. states that Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The proposed parking lot is an accessory lot to the main parking lot associated with the building. Therefore, this criterion has already been met. Wheel stops: Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The parking lot design did not address this standard, however, it can be met and the approval will be conditioned accordingly. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 10 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N.1. States that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The proposed standard and compact parking stalls comply with this criterion. The proposed parking lot access is 24 feet wide, which complies with this standard. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle-parking facilities should be provided under cover. Bike parking was addressed as part of the original SDR approval. Because no additional building space is proposed, this does not apply. Minimum Off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Minimum parking for an office is 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The total square footage of the Progressive Insurance Building is 35,500 square feet. An additional 675 square feet of area is added to this figure with the proposed maintenance shop. Given the total 36,175 square feet of floor space, this development is allowed up to 148 parking stalls. A total of 169 stalls are proposed (including 4 handicapped spaces), 21 more than allowed by current standard. The applicant has requested an adjustment, which was reviewed and approved previously in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, however, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Resubmit a plan addressing wheel stops as described in Section 18.765.040.J. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 11 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 18.775.70 Sensitive Land Permits: An applicant who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 1.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area, either a Type II or Type Ill permit is required, as delineated in Section 18.775.015 D and E. the approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas, e.g., floodplain, are presented in Subsections B-E below. With excessive slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; The steep slope area being disturbed by the proposal is very small and isolated to the proposed entrance area to the new parking lot. The retaining wall proposed will minimize necessary grading activity to just the extent required to support the parking lot. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; The applicant has prepared a Grading and Erosion Control Plan, which addresses potential erosion and sedimentation issues. The location of silt fence, hay bales and other erosion control devises have been illustrated on this plan. These measures will prevent both on and off-site hazards related to erosion associated with construction of the proposed improvement. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: Wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; Because the proposed site is a parking lot, this criterion does not apply. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the area not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. According to the applicant, disturbed areas will be re-vegetated as soon as possible after construction activity has ceased. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 12 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 The applicant has provided a plan that identifies 21 trees existing on the site greater than or equal to 12-inches in diameter. Of the 21 trees, 8 are proposed to be removed, thus resulting in 62% of the existing trees being retained. Based on the percent retained, 50% of the inches to be removed must be mitigated. The total inches removed are 114, therefore, 57 inches are required to be mitigated. The applicant has indicated 44 inches will be planted on site, therefore, 13 additional inches must be mitigated offsite or by fee-in-lieu. A tree protection plan is required. A general description was submitted explaining how one would protect the trees that will be retained. Subsequent removal of a tree: Section 18.790.040.B. states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030. or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A deed restriction will need to be recorded for the thirteen trees that will be retained on the site. This must be recorded prior to any site work occurring on-site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal are not met outright, however, by complying with the following conditions, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION:The applicant shall provide the following: tree mitigation plan for the additional 13 caliper inches not proposed to be planted on-site; post a bond to insure planting of the 57 mitigation inches; record a deed restriction for those trees that are to be preserved; construct the recommended tree protection measures for the trees to be preserved prior to commencement of construction. (The deed restriction may be removed or may be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die, or be determined to be a hazardous tree by a certified Arboculturist). Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. FINDING: Because the applicant is not proposing any new access from SW 72nd Avenue. A wall is to be constructed to the left of the parking lot not higher then 3.0 feet tall. Tree branches to the right of the parking lot will be pruned to 8 feet in height to maintain visual clearance in order for this criterion to be met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards — Chapter 18.810: Section 18.810.030.A.1. states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 13 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Section 8.810.030. A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC). This site lies adjacent to SW 72"d Avenue, which is classified as a major collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of between 60 and 80 feet. At present, there are approximately 30 to 40 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, which is adequate. No additional dedications are required. SW 72nd Avenue is currently improved, with the exception of sidewalk and street trees. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should install a concrete sidewalk and plant street trees adjacent to the development frontage. The applicant's plans indicate they will install these improvements as a part of their development. Water: The site is presently served from the City's public water system. No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. Sanitary Sewer: The existing site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. No additional public sewer line work is necessary to support the development. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the west toward SW 72"d Avenue. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to convey the additional storm water from the parking area into an onsite biofiltration swale. From there, the storm water will be directed into an existing onsite area drain, which presently ties into the public storm drainage system for SW 72nd Avenue. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the private water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 14 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Building Division has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: 1.) Plans show shop size 30' x 22". 2.) Retaining walls greater than 48' high must be designed by an engineer. 3.) Wall of maintenance shop within 20' of the property line shall be 1-hour fire resistant. 4.) Additional accessible parking shall be provided (2) ea. 5.) Roof drain shall connect to the storm drain system. 6.) Provide a fire hydrant within 250 feet of the proposed maintenance shop. 7.) Will there be welding in the shop? Staff Response: The comments from the Building Division have been addressed within this decision and conditioned, if necessary. The City of Tigard Property Manager, Development Review Engineering and Crime Prevention Officer have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and their comments/concerns have been addressed and conditioned, if necessary in this decision. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency and Tualatin Valley Water District have had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 1 999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp e�al: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 15 OF 16 SDP 1999-00010 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. lTHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON OCTOBER I , 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. • 44- September 17, 1999 PREPARED : MAth-ewS6idegg re DATE Assistant Planner 1 - o r Septemb 17 er 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\Mathew\sdr\progressive Ins. Parking Lot.doc Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 16 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 v t N Al 7 t� O /.N•Ei �..�.`� �\ Ai 7w�.••. -°..GL'i ff- . la . w.::ti , i--�- "( .=uo: �..,, ._ -ih�y;;}��^ X CA Z•,•I / / —I 'D ///::: :_ /,/, /,;1 `.'P j ;' ' t" ~ r' ///r \c.� ) • i`� y ,I D Z /-/,::::-/-', ��i'/�., ' ,-- �, ;// ' � 67� ,,�I,,,/ 'IS.- ,, '1.1 .. ,� i �� / ''':;: ,. /;i///ii N,. .;/,,,41.1 ./ ,,� / '•Z -, �� % '! r /,'".6/' � !f�l `., ..ri i�'`i'%'� ••� 112 1..s.., . * \' t. -///"•;ó'_ f �� ti. ' + i S: o;•30 %-.. l r1 i,� 1 ' 'j' i r ` z I. hr -� • =o a � / / , \ � , >!! ; ; , , 1/frl ; jr �! , I • —m �., //L..../7• '7 , 1 ! / , 4 k�i t / p I I.•A r. 3 7D /,:/. • 1 ,rrl H ,, i 1.:. • , ( 1 ' f " , . 1 I i . `J / 1!ilk' • ,:v:::/, ,/ . . , 7. ,. / ,•::: ., ,,, , ° EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING / BUILDING CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION Lv. i i :—I I \ \ v CITY of TIGARD . E GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VAR S VICINITY MAP MI „ycf . • ii FIR LP D_1 SDR 1999-00010 SLR 1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE 2 SUBJECT PARCELS INSURANCE . SANDBURG s PARKING LOT & � -r MAINTENANCE - — l BUILDING 16,. . . 0 S. MINK Ilk .4:5,06.):.53\ a:• . AL N �• 0 200 400 600 Fast • • '0 a 1'=466 feet ‘ 111 11111 in — AF City of Tigard .11 Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hal Blvd BONITA RD / Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639.4171_... \n -) l ' httpl/ww.v.u.fi9ard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 16, 1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00010 CITY OF TIGARD PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT & SHOP Community Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/11/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP Site Development Review SDR1999-00010 SLR1999-00008 VAR1999-00026 VAR1999-00027 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to build a 44 space parking lot, and a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building to serve the existing development. Sensitive Lands Review approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that have slopes in excess of 25%. Two Adjustments have also been requested. The first adjustment is to the maximum allowable parking spaces to allow for additional parking and the second adjustment is to reduce the number of street trees due to slopes along the street. APPLICANT: Progressive Insurance OWNER: Progressive Casualty Ins. 7150 SW Sandburg Road 6300 Wilson Mills Road Tigard, OR 97223 Mayfield, OH 44143 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial District; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. LOCATION: 7150 SW Sandburg Road; WCTM 2S101 DC, Tax Lot 03900 and 04100. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, REVIEW 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790 and 18.810. CRITERIA: SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the Decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate • charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp e�al: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. 1 THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON OCTOBER I , 1999. , Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheideqger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. � VICINITY MAP I I�'�1. 1 p! LiI ,' SDR 1999-00010 - J,_• t SLR 1999-00006 I <-■.1��= PROGRESSIVE ,' �a Ng 2 SUBJECT INSURANCE �,,,' PARCELS PARKING LOT& 1 i MAINTENANCE I ��• BUILDING 11.111.111a MI , l• li_ N I " 1 V _ I Coq.o.,∎ I 1< ( lnw °--- r- - , ..M RIRINIR% FNIkR11WR Plot ORYI:.FN116.1i9i:C:YrrpbVMAIC0.TMR 1` R w > r- z �a .a \C> -,s--1 1 `? ? \�1 11 1 oQ C7\...,did-_,_, A,..s.F.:-.6Erameat.--7 4 I 4 ,•---.' l` PROPOSED PARKING LOT\ m Q �,i \ +�Q i11.I i!!_:�I;JN_I.aigqul ,4 a K a ce _11114. -4,,,,,,,...,„.....--„,:-, fs4 ;4*. .,..,: :____7 5 it) b'.144%; 1 "1< 1 iJOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENH ER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMF LY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION 411. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CI TY OF TIGARD Community cDevetopment Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: July 16, 1999 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00010 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 1999-00008 FILE NAME: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT & MAINTENANCE BUILDING PROPOSAL: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park District.) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON July 30, 1999. All comments should be directed to Mark Roberts, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the bG ror an appeal to the Tigard Planning .mission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14- day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." H I iR �} VICINITY MAP I 1 . VINE �D SDR 1999-00010 -1 SLR 1999-00008 Imium ma 1 I PROGRESSIVE 11111 _ II INSURANCE . i 11 J2 SUBJECT PARCELS PARKING LOT& MAINTENANCE �` I \\\ BUILDING vw N — \: • , Cay af Igard 1 1/ n n \ w'"1"1 ... REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: September 8, 1999 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer , - RE: SDR 1999-00010, Progressive Insurance Parking Lot & Maint. Bldg. Description: This approval is for a 44-space parking lot and a 20'X25' maintenance building. The existing business is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street (WCTM 2S1 01 DC, Tax Lot 3900), but the new parking area and maintenance building will be located on the adjacent Tax Lot 4100, which takes access from SW 72nd Avenue. Findings: 1 . Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, which is classified as a major collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of between 60 and 80 feet. At present, there is approximately 30 to 40 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, which is adequate. No additional dedications are required. SW 72nd Avenue is currently improved, with the exception of sidewalk and street trees. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should install a concrete sidewalk and plant street trees adjacent to the development frontage. The applicant's plans indicate they will install these improvements as a part of their development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00010 Progressive Insurance Parking PAGE 1 2. Water: The site is presently served from the City's public water system. No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. 3. Sanitary Sewer: The existing site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. No additional public sewer line work is necessary to support the development. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the west toward SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to convey the additional storm water from the parking area into an onsite biofiltration swale. From there, the storm water will be directed into an existing onsite area drain, which presently ties into the public storm drainage system for SW 72nd Avenue. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00010 Progressive Insurance Parking PAGE 2 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1 . Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the sidewalk and street trees on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five 5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 72nd Avenue as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00010 Progressive Insurance Parking PAGE 3 C. driveway apron 4. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 5. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements. 6. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \\ti g333\u sr\depts\en g\bria n r\comments\sd r 1999-00010.bd r.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00010 Progressive Insurance Parking PAGE 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 16,1999 Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program JUL 191999 _ FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division RECEIVED PLANNING STAFF CONTACT:'Mark J.Roberts,Associate Planner[x3151 ' AUG 0 2 1999 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 CITY OF TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)1999-00010/SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT[SLR)1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDINGI REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: July 30,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: , We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v .lease provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: 1 j L M I Phone Number[sl: 84 SDR 1999-00010/PROGRESSIVE INS. PKNG.LOT&MAINTENANCE BLDG. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 16,1999 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 2 0 1999 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mark J.Roberts,Associate Planner[x3151 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISM 1999-00010/SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT MLR)1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT Si MAINTENANCE BUILDING REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: July 30,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA E CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V � (ease provide the foffowing information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: e, Phone Number's): SDR 1999-00010/PROGRESSIVE INS.PKNG.LOT&MAINTENANCE BLDG. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 16,1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 2 0 1999 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mark J.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 1999-00010/SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT[SLR]1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDING REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: July 30,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v r �► (Please provide the following information)Name of Pt7son[s1 Commenting: A0vc Phone Number[sl: 4 F- SDR 1999-00010/PROGRESSIVE INS. PKNG.LOT&MAINTENANCE BLDG. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O TIGARD Community Devetopment S(apingA Better Community DATE: July 16,1999 TO: Acting Building_Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 2 0 1999 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mark 1.Roberts,Associate Planner[x315] Phone: 1503)639-41/1/Fax: (503)684-7297 7 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00010/SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT(SLRI 1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDING REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: July 30,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. i.- Written comments provided below: /� 1 ('14wf 1�vv JA vie J1t! �t)'x 2L'L (0 Rei-24%,.1wf �--A))J /pre.."//r *-Air VF /} Mitt 4- be e4.1191-.t( 4.. l... 1;4fr L) DVRLt 0 A - - fAr wi7X )h xo' v -1.1 . - It . e. i" f- i C`)) 42-4 414,0,,A / 4fte// Chi, pir•.1G“, f JA4 )1 G• 0-,rJr.11/. (..).t.,_ 6) 2vut c✓r«Jr, c'0✓,,,.c7t- y., f.tL r71 �•-, $-) 6ru,,,.ir„ U l=4_ 4, i)1,Q✓2f'0 ' of t1 , "Ave. (6) t.,,,{l t1.,, le 1.vt1,./t V (P1 ase provide the folTowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: if 1 Phone Number's]: 7v' ; I SDR 1999-00010/PROGRESSIVE INS. PKNG.LOT&MAINTENANCE BLDG. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TG CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: July 16,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark J.Roberts,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031 604-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SOB)1999-00010/SENSITIVE LANDS PERMIT[SLR]1999-00008 - PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDING REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: July 30,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v '► (ease provide the foil-owing information)Name of Person's)Commenting: Phone Number(s): I SDR 1999-00010/PROGRESSIVE INS. PKNG.LOT&MAINTENANCE BLDG. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS • C[T Area:[Cl [El [Sl Mil CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS [a Pace for reviewary C(T Boek(s] FILE NMI: tRciut -- o FILE NAMEISI: ss'Nc ,4;,51, �V,;, 1,,.'k� CITY OFFICES - LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,s.,penmor _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./wprnnt Svcs Tevhnotanr _POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,CnmePreveMnnon.er ,BUILDING DIV./David Scott,ei,m,,,,Official VvENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Depmnl Rev,nw Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,uudcs Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder /OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* ,./rUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*LNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPAs/zoA's) Larry French PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY * 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue Bonneville Power Administration _WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Trans. PO Box 3621 Aeronautics Division 155 N. First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Portland,OR 97208-3621 Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _ 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 OR,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPAs) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 811 SW Sixth Avenue _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97204 ODOT,REGION 1 * _Mike Borreson(Engineer) CITY OF PORTLAND Sonya Kazen,Dvtpmt Rev coon _Jim Tice(1GAs) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir 123 NW Flanders Tom Harry(Current Pl.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Phil Healy(current Pl.Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue _Sr.Cartographer)CPNaCA)MS 14 Portland,OR 97204 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Jim Nims(zcA)MS is Jane Estes,Permit Specialist _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Right-of-Way Section(Vacations) Portland,OR 97221-2414 Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO30546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 11( Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE(Apps Eof RAN ofPM) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * - UMOICAFtf ANFOMA.FIC NOTIFICAfIOM IF WITH£00' OF fait ZULICCF PROPtRFY'FOR A1Mr/ALL Carp PROItCVf. (PAOSCCr PLAMNtA IS AJSFONJIBU FOB INDICATING IA&TUS TO NOTIFY/ h:\patty\masters\rfcnotice.mst 22-Apr-99 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRY of nG uto Community(Development Shaping Better Community STATE, OAF O EC oW ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lansford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'7igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (Fie No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director F3 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDRI999-00010/SLR1999-00008/VAR1999-00026 & 21 - PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT& MAINT. SHOP AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) El City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . f— AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission ▪ Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:u _ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council U NOTICE OF: (TyNo f.iail of Nlice) FOR: ( 7 (Fie No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 1N' day of September, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 11"' day of September,1999, postage prepaid. t �/ o (Persoia -.- -: Note-) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ' e`er , 19 OFFICIAL SEAL , �� -� DIANE M JELDERKS NOTAB PUBLIC OF OREGO \;;;,;." , NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 My Commission Expires. V 7. 3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 F.XH1 A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 4 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00010 °'!� CITY OF TIGARD PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT & SHOP Community(Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/11/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP Site Development Review SDR1999-00010 SLR1999-00008 VAR1999-00026 VAR1999-00027 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to build a 44 space parking lot, and a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building to serve the existing development. Sensitive Lands Review approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that have slopes in excess of 25%. Two Adjustments have also been requested. The first adjustment is to the maximum allowable parking spaces to allow for additional parking and the second adjustment is to reduce the number of street trees due to slopes along the street. APPLICANT: Progressive Insurance OWNER: Progressive Casualty Ins. 7150 SW Sandburg Road 6300 Wilson Mills Road Tigard, OR 97223 Mayfield, OH 44143 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial District; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. LOCATION: 7150 SW Sandburg Road; WCTM 2S101 DC, Tax Lot 03900 and 04100. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, REVIEW 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790 and 18.810. CRITERIA: SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the Decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. App._ ea�l: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON OCTOBER I , 1999. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. plik VICINITY MAP : III \: SDR■MI. t SLR 1999-00008 ���_ �,I, PROGRESSIVE . , 2 te... INSURANCE PARKING PARCELS PARKING LOT& \���N �,IK MAINTENANCE �• BUILDING nPH D.YLB} I \ L• r 'C<N\ ihR. jill IM11111111k N 1.r .11111111‘ ' , , — a moo CIP/@Mewl runiumme pm.Pm r 1 ��■k -I --... .LL::..,,..,.. It lff. \ ; "1.1O z \ CI '' > I , ti,>* - •.; ila t; ��-.ate' =o x u`1� ` PROPOSED PARKING LOT - �' 1 ...m ., .1 \°∎ "^_,s: 1 1._ _∎ !•N\%.\:V.I.' N=4.. 6k, . -ff-—; , o -\ r.,,, 11),',-,*-2_,...,__ g o 1 It SCR-119-oao/o EXHIBIT 2S 101 DC-00400 2S 101 DC-00900 PACIFIC NW PROPERTIES LP HICKETHIER LILLIAN M 9950 SW ARCTIC DR 9220 NW LOVEJOY BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S 101 DC-01100 101 DC-01300 CIRCLE A W PRODUCTS COMPANY JO WAYNE ' • &JOYCE YVONNE 509 W MONROE ST 7410 S 1:. RRY DR HIGHLAND, IL 62249 :•RD,OR 9 -• 2S101DC-03700 2S101DC-03702 UNITED FOOD&COMMERICAL WORKERS LJ PROPERTIES& PO BOX 23555 7185 SW SANDBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101DC-03703 2S101DC-03800 BECK TOM L MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T 13500 SW 72ND AVE 7415 FAIRWAY LOOP PORTLAND,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S101DC-03801 ' s1DC-03900 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY PROGR -. V ' '••LTY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD 63091'S•N RD MAYFIELD VILLAGE,OH 44143 MAYFIELD VILLAGE,0 •4143 2S101DC-04000 101DC-04100 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP PRO '. SIV • "•ALTY 4380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 6300 "•N - S RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 • FIELD VILLAGE, • 44143 2S101DC-04602 2S101DC-04603 MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T WATUMULL PROPERTIES CORP 7190 SW SANDBURG ST 307 LEWERS ST#6FLR TIGARD,OR 97223 HONOLULU,HI 96815 2S101 DC-04800 01 DC-06200 JOLLY WAYNE RAY&JOYCE YVONNE 72ND+. .'E LLC 7410 SW CHERRY DR 740• .11 C :RY ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ••RTLAND,OR • 23 2S101DC-06300 2S101DD-00100 72ND VENTURE LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES& 7400 SW CHERRY ST PO BOX 407 PORTLAND,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97440 2S 101 DD-00101 2S 101 DD-00200 WESTON HOLDING CO LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES INC 2154 NE BROADWAY 91434 COBURG INDUSTRIAL WAY PORTLAND,OR 97232 COBURG,OR 97440 • 2S1010D-00300 2S101DD-00400 HAYTER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHI TOC MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 23643'SW STAFFORD HILLS DR 6825 SW SANDBERG ST WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 DD-00401 • 01 DD-00700 NORTHWEST MEDICAL TEAMS PROG- IV - . SALTY PO BOX 10 6300 W ••N - S RD PORTLAND,OR 97207 M •FIELD VILLAGE, € 44143 2S101DD-00701 2S101DD-00702 RFD PUBLICATIONS INC J&K PROPERTIES CORP 9600 SW BOECKMAN 6900 SW SANDBURG RD WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223 25101 DD-00703 2S 101 DD-00800 TARKIAINEN REINO J A AND I S PROPERTIES LP 20895 SW LEBEAU RD PO BOX 87908 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 VANCOUVER,WA 98687 2• •1DD-00900 2510100-01000 TARKI• • N RE ■ : A AND LEEK GEORGE W 20895 S e - • RD 1515 SE HAWTHORNE • -WOOD,OR 97 •1 PORTLAND,OR 97214 • 101 DD-01100 `12AA-00900 PA--' -ROP S INC SPI R PROPS: - LP 91434 :.:G INDUSTRIAL WAY 4380 S "-.n DAM AVE STE 100 ::URG,OR 9 ••I P•' LAND,OR 9 01 2S112AB-00100 25112AB-00200 SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC WARNE MARJORY ETHEL 4444 NW YEON 2917 SW WESTVIEW CIRCLE PORTLAND,OR 97210 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S112AB-00300 S112AB-00400 HICKS PRENTISS C HA • - Fs LIMITED PARTNERSHI PO BOX 23633 2 -• :FFORD HILLS DR TIGARD, OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR • '68 2S112AB-00600 TUFFORD PHYLLIS J TRUSTEE 4836 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97206 . 1 A 411, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF noARo Community(Development ShapingA Better Community STATE OAF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (check APPropriate Box(s)Bebw) C NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: r— AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-0001 I LR1999-i i i I:/VAR1999-iii , '. - PROGRESSIVE I RAN E PARKI I yAl T. ,I' AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . • I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) u City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:l I - AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF: (Type-Kind of No/Ce) FOR: C3 I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", on the 17th day of September, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 11th day of September,1999, postage pp (Person thaTPrepar-• 'otice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of alii, ek" , 19 #:±y OFFICIAL SEAL � 0' Z"C./ DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY P LI 1 0' � `;. I j NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION No.328578 MY Commission Expires: 9 /7 ?/60 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT,07,2003 EXIHIBIT A w� � � A 0 SITED � ! � ��� _ CITY OF TIGARD m� iin C'p w(opmcn1 PROOR IN$Y C NG 10T41111141110P S�41(Better Community 120 DAYS = 11/11/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT AND SHOP Site Development Review SDR1999-00010 SLR1999-00008 VAR1999-00026 VAR1999-00027 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to build a 44 space parking lot, and a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building to serve the existing development. Sensitive Lands Review approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that have slopes in excess of 25%. Two Adjustments have also been requested. The first adjustment is to the maximum allowable parking spaces to allow for additional parking and the second adjustment is to reduce the number of street trees due to slopes along the street. APPLICANT: Progressive Insurance OWNER: Progressive Casualty Insurance 7150 SW Sandburg Road 6300 Wilson Mills Road Tigard, OR 97223 Mayfield, OH 44143 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial District; I-L. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L: Light Industrial District. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. LOCATION: 7150 SW Sandburg Road; WCTM 2S101 DC, Tax Lot 03900 and 04100. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, REVIEW 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790 and 18.810. CRITERIA: SECTION II. DECISION o *hereby 6 1i itoruny �t�ri+ s tilesignee ItiasAPP° a k � bieet ndr l ppraVal. Thy fi ice* 1 .'itx)d(cieeiOnCon which the siotytatiwt are noted in Section IV. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 1 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THE STAFF CONTACT IS MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER IN THE PLANNING DIVISION AT 503-639-4171.) Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 317) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant will be required to submit a revised site plan showing designated pedestrian pathways between parking lots and buildings. Pathways will need to be designated as pathways and cannot double as parking stalls. 2. Provide documentation showing future connection to adjacent parking lots, or evidence that connection is not feasible. 3. Prior to issuance of site development or building permits, the applicant will be required to submit documentation of type and amount of ground cover to be planted between SW 72nd Avenue and the private drive. 4. Before a building permit will be issued, a tree protection plan and fencing will need to be erected on site. 5. A revised site plan shall be provided to indicate that wheel stops will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. 6. The applicant shall provide the following: tree mitigation plan for 24 caliper inches; pay the fee in-lieu of payment or post a bond to ensure planting of the mitigation trees; record a deed restriction for those trees that are to be preserved; submit an arborist report providing recommended tree protection measures; and construct the recommended tree protection measures for the trees to be preserved prior to commencement of construction. (The deed restriction may be removed or may be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die, or be determined to be a hazardous tree by a certified Arborist.) Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 7. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the installation of the sidewalk and street trees on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant will need to submit five 5) copies of a proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 8. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporation entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 2 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 9. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 72' Avenue as a part of this project: A. 6-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; and C. driveway apron. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11 . The applicant shall provide a detailed lighting plan prior to the issuance of building permits. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE ATISFIEDMPRI R TO-THE FINAL BUILDING INSPEC sew G PERFORM D: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements. 13. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 14. All improvements shall be made in accordance with the approved plans. Submit to the Building Division (Jim Funk, 639-4171, ext. 390) for review and approval: 15. Retaining walls greater than 48 feet in height must be designed by an engineer. 16. The Wall of the maintenance building that is within 20 feet of property line shall be 1-hour fire resistant. 17. Roof drains shall connect to the storm drain system. 18. Provide a fire hydrant within 250 feet of the proposed maintenance shop. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE; EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION, Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 3 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A 5,752 square foot office building was permitted in 1991 to be added on to the existing office building through a major modification. No other development has occurred to date. Vicinity Information: The site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road. The parcel of land is located on the south side of SW Sandburg Road. The subject site and the land surrounding the site are located in the I-L Zone. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes a 44-space parking lot, a 20-foot by 25-foot maintenance building and an associated storm water quality facility to treat run-off from the newly created impervious surface. The applicant is requesting additional parking for 250 on-site workers and approximately 10 visitors in the building at any one time. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Site Development Review - Chapter 18.360: Section 18.360.030.A provides that Site Development Review for a new development or major modification of an approved plan or existing development shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.090. In compliance with Section 18.390.040, a pre-application conference was held on 11/06/98. An application for Site Development Review was submitted on 6/16/99 and subsequently deemed complete on 7/15/99. Notice of pending Type II Administrative Decision was given, as required by Section 18.390.040.C. The relevant approval criteria are addressed below with respect to the factual information provided by the applicant and are the basis for this Director's decision. Section 18.360.090 states that the Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this Title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards. The applicable review criteria in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code;18.360, Site Development Review; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.530, Industrial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.775, Sensitive Lands, 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters;18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 4 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Impact Study: Section 18.39O.O4O.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. An impact study was not required because Progressive Insurance is not intensifying the use, only adding additional parking to serve it's current needs. Therefore, they will not be increasing the impact on public facilities. Variances and Adjustments- Chapter 18.370: This section provides standards for the granting of variances from the applicable zoning requirements of this title where it can be shown that, owing to special and unusual circumstances related to a specific property, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the applicable zone would cause an undue or unnecessary hardship, except that no use variances shall be granted. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to two code requirements. The first adjustment is to allow an increase to the maximum parking requirements. The second adjustment is to waive the street tree requirement along SW 72nd Avenue. Parking adjustment and standards. The individual characteristics of the use at that location requires more parking than is generally required for a use of this type and intensity; Progressive Insurance employs 250 on-site workers and has approximately 10 visitors in the building at any one time. The applicant's business is unique in it's higher than average employee density/intensity than typical general office uses. The need for additional parking cannot be reasonably met through provision of on-street parking or shared parking with adjacent or nearby uses; Adjacent parking lots to the north are at their capacity and cannot offset the need for 44 additional spaces. The site plan shall indicate how the additional parking can be redeveloped to more intensive transit-supportive use in the future. The applicant's narrative states that the location of the proposed parking lot could be used as a building pad in the future if parking demands decrease due to increased modes of public transportation. FINDING: As noted above, the proposed parking lot could be converted into a more intensive transit-supportive use, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 5 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 • Adjustment for street tree requirements: Section 18.390.030 states that the Director shall approve with conditions, or deny a request for the adjustments to the street tree requirements in Section 18.745.030, based on the following criteria: If the location of a proposed tree would cause potential problems with existing utility lines, if the tree would cause visual clearance problems; or if there is not adequate space in which to plant street trees. The applicant is proposing to not plant street trees on a portion of the lot adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue however, 7 street trees are being planted at the south end of the lot. If the applicant were required to perform grading to allow for street trees, the process would conflict with sensitive land issues by increasing impact to soils, therefore there is no space for street trees of the north portion of the lot. FINDING: Because of the grading and sensitive land issues with the site, the criteria of the above section are satisfied. Use Classification- Chapter 18.530: The applicant is proposing to add an additional parking lot for employees. This use is classified in Code Section 18.130 as a major modification to the I-L light industrial zone. The applicant is proposing to build a 44-space parking lot and a 20 x 25 maintenance building. A parking lot and accessory structure in the I-L zone is permitted as a major modification and subject to site development review. TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P I-L I-H Minimum Lot Size None None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a -- -- -- public or private street Maximum Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5] 85 % 85 Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] 15 % 15% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795 (Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 6 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. Comparing the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the I-L zone, the zone has no minimum lot size requirement. The minimum lot width is 50 feet. The required front yard setback is 30 feet, no other setbacks are required. Maximum site coverage is 85 percent and minimum landscaping requirements call for 15 percent. • FINDING: The applicant's narrative addresses the dimensional standards and the plans show that the site has a 270 foot front yard setback., no other setbacks are required. The applicant has indicated that 70 percent of the site is impervious, leaving 30 percent for landscaping. Therefore this criterion has been met. Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: Walkways: Section 18.705.030.F. states that walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan indicates that a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area is to be constructed. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; The proposal is an industrial development; therefore, this standard does not apply. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The only improvement subject to the regulations of this section is for improved pedestrian walkways. The applicant is proposing a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area. FINDING: Where the stairway connecting the proposed parking area with the existing parking is proposed, a stripped walkway will be required, thus eliminating the two parking spaces at the entrance and exit of the stairway. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 7 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. FINDING: A lighting plan for the proposed walkway connecting the proposed parking lot and the existing lots are not needed. Therefore this standard has been met. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The driveway access pavement width is 24 feet and because parking is already available within 50 feet of the building entrance, the 50-foot rule does not apply. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one- way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The applicant is not proposing one-way traffic, therefore, this criterion does not apply. Section 18.705.030.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The only improvement subject to the regulations of this section is for improved pedestrian walkways. The applicant is proposing a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant does not show appropriate pedestrian walkway crossing from the parking lot to the building. The proposed stairway connecting the proposed parking lot to the existing lot empties into a vehicle stall. The applicant also has not addressed the possibility of connecting with parking areas on adjacent lots. Therefore, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. If applicant complies with the conditions below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: ♦ Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan showing designated pedestrian pathways between parking lots and buildings. Pathways will need to be designated as pathways and cannot double as parking stalls. ♦ Provide documentation showing future connection to adjacent parking lots, or evidence that connections are not feasible. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 8 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 • Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street Trees: Section 18.745.04O.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.O4O.C. Section 18.745.O4O.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: • Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The applicant states in the narrative that the project fronts on SW 72nd Avenue for a distance greater than 100 feet. The project also contains an existing driveway that is in excess of 100 feet in length. The applicant is requesting a landscaping adjustment due to the sensitive lands associated with the site, which staff has approved previously in this decision, therefore, this standard does not apply. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of- way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned I-L and surrounding property is zoned C-P. According to the above-referenced matrices, development of parking lots in the I-L zoning districts does not require buffering and screening from other uses in the C-P zoning classification. Therefore, this criterion is met. Screening: Special Provisions Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 9 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 • The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The proposed parking area is 42 spaces, the applicant is proposing to provide 6 parking lot trees in curbed planters. FINDING: The site plan shows one tree for every seven parking spaces. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Section 18.745.050.E.2. states that any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. The proposed parking lot will not contain a refuse container or service facility, therefore, this criterion does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.745, Buffering and Screening have been satisfied. Off-Street Parking and Loading Location: Section 18.765.030.B. states that off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building: FINDING: The proposed parking lot is not a residential use. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. General Provisions Section 18.765.030.a. states that Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The proposed parking lot is an accessory lot to the main parking lot associated with the building. Therefore, this criterion has already been met. Wheel stops: Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The parking lot design did not address this standard, however, it can be met and the approval will be conditioned accordingly. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 10 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N.1. States that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The proposed standard and compact parking stalls comply with this criterion. The proposed parking lot access is 24 feet wide, which complies with this standard. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle-parking facilities should be provided under cover. Bike parking was addressed as part of the original SDR approval. Because no additional building space is proposed, this does not apply. Minimum Off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Minimum parking for an office is 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The total square footage of the Progressive Insurance Building is 35,500 square feet. An additional 675 square feet of area is added to this figure with the proposed maintenance shop. Given the total 36,175 square feet of floor space, this development is allowed up to 148 parking stalls. A total of 169 stalls are proposed (including 4 handicapped spaces), 21 more than allowed by current standard. The applicant has requested an adjustment, which was reviewed and approved previously in this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading have not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, however, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Resubmit a plan addressing wheel stops as described in Section 18.765.040.J. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 11 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 18.775.70 Sensitive Land Permits: An applicant who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 1.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area, either a Type II or Type Ill permit is required, as delineated in Section 18.775.015 D and E. the approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas, e.g., floodplain, are presented in Subsections B-E below. With excessive slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; The steep slope area being disturbed by the proposal is very small and isolated to the proposed entrance area to the new parking lot. The retaining wall proposed will minimize necessary grading activity to just the extent required to support the parking lot. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; The applicant has prepared a Grading and Erosion Control Plan, which addresses potential erosion and sedimentation issues. The location of silt fence, hay bales and other erosion control devises have been illustrated on this plan. These measures will prevent both on and off-site hazards related to erosion associated with construction of the proposed improvement. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: Wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; Because the proposed site is a parking lot, this criterion does not apply. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the area not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening. According to the applicant, disturbed areas will be re-vegetated as soon as possible after construction activity has ceased. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 12 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 The applicant has provided a plan that identifies 21 trees existing on the site greater than or equal to 12-inches in diameter. Of the 21 trees, 8 are proposed to be removed, thus resulting in 62% of the existing trees being retained. Based on the percent retained, 50% of the inches to be removed must be mitigated. The total inches removed are 114, therefore, 57 inches are required to be mitigated. The applicant has indicated 44 inches will be planted on site, therefore, 13 additional inches must be mitigated offsite or by fee-in-lieu. A tree protection plan is required. A general description was submitted explaining how one would protect the trees that will be retained. Subsequent removal of a tree: Section 18.790.040.B. states that any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030. or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. A deed restriction will need to be recorded for the thirteen trees that will be retained on the site. This must be recorded prior to any site work occurring on-site. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the standards of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal are not met outright, however, by complying with the following conditions, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION:The applicant shall provide the following: tree mitigation plan for the additional 13 caliper inches not proposed to be planted on-site; post a bond to insure planting of the 57 mitigation inches; record a deed restriction for those trees that are to be preserved; construct the recommended tree protection measures for the trees to be preserved prior to commencement of construction. (The deed restriction may be removed or may be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die, or be determined to be a hazardous tree by a certified Arboculturist). Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. FINDING: Because the applicant is not proposing any new access from SW 72' Avenue. A wall is to be constructed to the left of the parking lot not higher then 3.0 feet tall. Tree branches to the right of the parking lot will be pruned to 8 feet in height to maintain visual clearance in order for this criterion to be met. Street and Utility Improvement Standards — Chapter 18.810: Section 18.810.030.A.1. states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 13 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 • Section 8.810.030. A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC). This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, which is classified as a major collector street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of between 60 and 80 feet. At present, there are approximately 30 to 40 feet of ROW adjacent to this site, which is adequate. No additional dedications are required. SW 72nd Avenue is currently improved, with the exception of sidewalk and street trees. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should install a concrete sidewalk and plant street trees adjacent to the development frontage. The applicant's plans indicate they will install these improvements as a part of their development. Water: The site is presently served from the City's public water system. No additional public water line work is needed to support this development. Sanitary Sewer: The existing site is presently served from the City's public sanitary sewer system. No additional public sewer line work is necessary to support the development. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the west toward SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to convey the additional storm water from the parking area into an onsite biofiltration swale. From there, the storm water will be directed into an existing onsite area drain, which presently ties into the public storm drainage system for SW 72nd Avenue. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the private water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 14 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Building Division has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: 1.) Plans show shop size 30' x 22". 2.) Retaining walls greater than 48' high must be designed by an engineer. 3.) Wall of maintenance shop within 20' of the property line shall be 1-hour fire resistant. 4.) Additional accessible parking shall be provided (2) ea. 5.) Roof drain shall connect to the storm drain system. 6.) Provide a fire hydrant within 250 feet of the proposed maintenance shop. 7.) Will there be welding in the shop? Staff Response: The comments from the Building Division have been addressed within this decision and conditioned, if necessary. The City of Tigard Property Manager, Development Review Engineering and Crime Prevention Officer have all had the opportunity to review the proposal and their comments/concerns have been addressed and conditioned, if necessary in this decision. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency and Tualatin Valley Water District have had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 2, 1 999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. App eal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Tigard, Oregon 97223. Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 15 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. ITHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON OCTOBER I , 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. September 17. 1999 PREPARED Mathew S6h rdegg rere DATE Assistant Planner c-- I r 17, 1999 Septembe . APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\Mathew\sdr\progressive Ins. Parking Lot.doc Progressive Parking Lot PAGE 16 OF 16 SDR 1999-00010 3 m o y 7 \ O ��,y' AN f Mr raw i › .41.;-.,..-:,;:::0 :.N- •.v+�. - .1 =!LNie!°- 'y#1'" :. °=t& "•'^.aye +_-y f', • / se:..:'� : f' i�%%:�=' ': • .324; 1-iir..:f� — y�..._. ,,.,./. X ..I , .r /,:. fir_ I / al rri / "Ti. 1 - ' • / •// f ,r �Y E � t � � �� 5 ,- ,..! '. / /./ \ i , //,:•:::•,-/ .. •/ , , ` D = &.:: /� /x / _ � // ' 7.!:.::". A,1/. \4:: -A:,x.w.4,- lial,/ , -!- 1 o '.t vim', v. v. / i J ! J J, / , ,i / ' ! J r 1 u ! 7t:::• ., I' = r le / ::/:::. . ; ) „ /if ; i il //lit , hitt ! 11 ! 'El. /% . ' Cai C a a . l' -,/::. . r. I ' Ili, ' 1 I ' • p/ i . • ; ' 'I. ., S it CI a ::/: ' ..,,, / ••:: t etsi.,,s.. \° EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION St® g 5 EXHIBIT B PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE 7150 SW SANDBURG ROAD TIGARD OR 97223 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE 6300 WILSON MILLS ROAD MAYFIELD OH 44143 A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community!Development Shaping fl Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR 1999-00010/SLR 1999-00008 - PROGRESSIVE INS. PKNG. LOT & MAINTENANCE BLDG. _ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) 121 City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) • City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . / — AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR: I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type'Rind of Notice) FOR: I (r,:eNo Na-,e Re,e,erc el (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEESI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B', on the 16"day of laly,1991 , and d-posited in the United States Mail on the 16a day of lluly,1999, postage prepaid. - - t / A,, ..- M Aii / WA" (' : . -re.- ed Notice) -' / the day of . �� 19 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befo me on tl y I�'�.a OFFICIAL SEAL i�/ �/ • h. ., DIANE M JELDERKS ' NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC-OF-OREGON ,_ YCO M COMMISSION SEPTEMBER My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRESSEPTEMGER 07,1999 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHL JER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI BIT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Devefopment ShapingA Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: July 16, 1999 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00010 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 1999-00008 FILE NAME: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT & MAINTENANCE BUILDING PROPOSAL: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. ZONE: I-P (Industrial Park District.) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON July 30, 1999. All comments should be directed to Mark Roberts, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the baL Jr an appeal to the Tigard Planning C ,omission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14- day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." -j NNW■- P11 VICINITY MAP • J SDR 1999-00010 �. SLR 1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE I INSURANCE I I I I 2 SUBJEC PARCELS PARKING LOT& MAINTENANCE \� BUILDING • A1.441b, Lmomni, 11110\ Air Cary of T■gard N —- I d�_ ortun _- •— • .�aw.. I( EXHIBIT B 2S 101 DC-00400 2S 101 DC-00900 PACIFIC NW PROPERTIES LP HICKETHIER LILLIAN M 4950 SW ARCTIC DR 9220 NW LOVEJOY BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S 101 DC-01100 101 DC-01300 CIRCLE A W PRODUCTS COMPANY JOL WAYNE '• &JOYCE YVONNE 509 W MONROE ST 7410 S ►:-i RRY DR HIGHLAND, I L 62249 =•RD,OR 9 '_3 2S 101 DC-03700 2S 101 DC-03702 UNITED FOOD&COMMERICAL WORKERS LJ PROPERTIES& PO BOX 23555 7185 SW SANDBURG RD TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S 101 DC-03703 2S 101 DC-03800 BECK TOM L MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T 13500 SW 72ND AVE 7415 FAIRWAY LOOP PORTLAND,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S 101 DC-03801 ' 11 DC-03900 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY PROGR '. V • "GI•LTY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD 630ES8N RD MAYFIELD VILLAGE,OH 44143 MAYFIELD VILLAGE,0 •4143 2S 101 DC-04000 101 DC-04100 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP PRO SIVE • -IALTY 4380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 6300 -•N • S RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 t. • FIELD VILLAGE, • 44143 2S 101 DC-04602 2S 101 DC-04603 MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T WATUMULL PROPERTIES CORP 7190 SW SANDBURG ST 307 LEWERS ST#6FLR TIGARD,OR 97223 HONOLULU,HI 96815 2S101 DC-04800 01 DC-06200 JOLLY WAYNE RAY&JOYCE YVONNE 72ND I 'E LLC 7410 SW CHERRY DR 7401 : C :RY ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ••RTLAND,OR • 23 2S 101 DC-06300 2S 101 DD-00100 72ND VENTURE LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES& 7400 SW CHERRY ST PO BOX 407 PORTLAND,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97440 2S 101 DD-00101 2S 101 DD-00200 WESTON HOLDING CO LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES INC 2154 NE BROADWAY 91434 COBURG INDUSTRIAL WAY PORTLAND,OR 97232 COBURG,OR 97440 2S101DD-00300 2S101DD-00400 '-IAYTER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHI TOC MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 23643 SW STAFFORD HILLS DR 6825 SW SANDBERG ST WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 101 DD-00401 01 DD-00700 NORTHWEST MEDICAL TEAMS PROG' IV SALTY PO BOX 10 6300W 'SN _ SRD PORTLAND,OR 97207 MA •FIELD VILLAGE, ► 44143 2S101 DD-00701 2S 101 DD-00702 RFD PUBLICATIONS INC J&K PROPERTIES CORP 9600 SW BOECKMAN 6900 SW SANDBURG RD WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 DD-00703 2S 101 DD-00800 TARKIAINEN REINO J A AND I S PROPERTIES LP 20895 SW LEBEAU RD PO BOX 87908 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 VANCOUVER,WA 98687 2' •1DD-00900 2S101DD-01000 TARKI• • N RE ■ s A AND LEEK GEORGE W 20895 S : • RD 1515 SE HAWTHORNE " 'WOOD,OR 97 •I PORTLAND,OR 97214 101DD-01100 112AA-00900 PA•"' •ROP S INC SPI R PROPS: LP 91434 •:G INDUSTRIAL WAY 4380 S .a PAM AVE STE 100 ::URG,OR 9 ••• P•• LAND,OR 9 01 2S112AB-00100 2S112AB-00200 SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC WARNE MARJORY ETHEL 4444 NW YEON 2917 SW WESTVIEW CIRCLE PORTLAND,OR 97210 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S112AB-00300 S112AB 00400 HICKS PRENTISS C HA • - FL LIMITED PARTNERSHI PO BOX 23633 2 •• &FFORD HILLS DR TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR • 168 2S112AB-00600 TUFFORD PHYLLIS J TRUSTEE 4836 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97206 APPLICANT MATERIALS 03/04/99 09:08 22508 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 2002.003 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . Ali, TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd-, Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATj PRE-APP. HELD WITH: MJR DATE OF PRE-APP.: 7/23/98 & 11 /6/98 Property Address/Location(s): 7150 SW Sandburg Street FOR STAFF USE-ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s):, 2S101 DC 3900 & 4100 Case No.(s): Q l q q 4 - 000/o Other Case No.(s): (°f CLD Site Size: 3.39 acres Receipt No.: 99-316/7 5' Application Accepted By�IV. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: e• -,. , E • wt- Date: -/&'c c�M-yr Address: 4;:, o Vj 'c.J /Yjcu-5 Pro Phone: 44o 444 3 4 City:_7A-fri ez..0 66/0 zip: 44 t 43 Date Dete ined To Be Complete: Applicant': Progressive Insurance --7 t Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 7150 SW Sandburg St. Phone: City: Tigard, OR Zip: 97223 Comp CIT Area • When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rte.1128198 iltur<7lnAmasters\s°ra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. Application Elements Submitted: PROEQSAL SUMMARY ❑ Application Form Et Owner's Signature/ Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site 1 V Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): • Site/Plot Plan Construction of a 44 space Barking lot, a (##o of f c co opies based on pre-app check list) 20' X 25' maintenance building, and associated Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/1"x 11") water quality facility. Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) I ■► Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/computed at application submittal) ( • 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped .— _ - Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Underrioo.D00) $ 800-00 (3100,0004999,999)—$1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$51510,000) 1 03/04/99 09:08 '$503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD l 003/003 Ust any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Sensitive Lands review re. ested due to a small ••rtion of the site to be impacted from the parking lot has a slope in excess of 25 percent. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL FLEMENTS as described on the front of this application In the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained. upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above reauest does not violate anydeed restrictions that may l e attached to or imposed upon th bject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this / Tit day of /'_= , 19 `i % e Signatture Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 /�✓ PRDRRfll/I/f 6300 WILSON MILLS ROAD MAYFIELD VILLAGE,OHIO 44143 216-461-5000 FAX 216-446-4130 June 11, 1999 Planning Division City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear To Whom it May Concern, This letter is to inform you that Harper, Houf& Regallis is acting on the behalf of Progressive Insurance on matters relating to the engineering, code and permit matters involved in the parking lot expansion at our property at 7150 SW Sandburg in Tigard, Oregon. They have the authority to answer any questions relating to this matter on our behalf. Sincerely Elar.• Bruce C. Adams Manager, Real Estate r 4 ,mil VIII CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping_ (Better Community, F LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 11/11/99 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDR] 1999-00010 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1999-00008 FILE TITLE: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDING OWNER: Progressive Casualty Insurance APPLICANT: Progressive Insurance 6300 Wilson Mills Road 7150 SW Sandburg St. Mayfield, Ohio 44143 Tigard, OR 97223 PHONE/FAX: (440) 446-3044 REQUEST: This is a request for a Site Development Review approval to construct a 44 space parking lot, a 20 x 25 maintenance building and associated water quality facility. Sensitive Lands approval is requested for impacts to portions of the site that are sloped in excess of 25%. LOCATION: The project site takes access from SW Sandburg Street although it is located adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue. The parcel is vacant and directly south of the existing Progressive Casualty Insurance building. The existing Progressive site is located at 7150 SW Sandburg Street; WCTM 2S1 01 DC Tax Lot 3900. The Parking Lot Development site is the adjacent Tax Lot 4100. ZONE: I-P (Industrial park District). APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360 (Site Development Review); 18.390 (Decision REVIEW Making Procedures); 18.530 (industrial Zoning Districts); 18.705 (Access, Egress and CRITERIA: Circulation); 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards) 18.745 (Landscaping and Screening); 18.765 (Off-Street Parking); 18.790 (Tree Removal); 18.795 (Visual Clearance Areas); 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: 7116/99 DUE: 7/30/99 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION p VICINITY MAP © NARRATIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL PLAN p SITE PLAN p LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TECH REPORT Di STORM DRAIN CALCS. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 315 SDR 1999-00010/SLR 1999-00008 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT&MAINTENANCE BUILDING LAND USE PROPOSAL CITY OF TIGARD OREGON July 15, 1999 Progressive Casualty Insurance Attn. Bruce C. Adams 6300 Wilson Mills Road Mayfield, Ohio 44143 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal for SDR 1999-00010 Dear Mr. Adams: This letter is to inform you that your application for Site Development Review (City file reference: SDR 1999-00010) is considered complete and has been accepted by the Planning Division. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x315. Sincerely, Mark J. Roberts Associate Planner i:\curpin\mjr1sdr\sdr99-10.cmp c: SDR 1999-00010 Land use file Gary Alfson, PE Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. 5200 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 580 Portland, OR 97201 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 06/23/99 16: 16 5 E. L LAND SURUEY1N5 503 245 7710 N.J' =-- v.�: FROM :FIRST oMERtCoN TITLE 503 656 5797 19 16-23 16:04 11664 a'.c2/t?7 . • . , . , dab • WATT OFOA[AC1H } a¢' l�C scl Cow,ortae4rae+osw+ j .—� acv � - Jeff/R. C �. . El t�-? ^ G,f,�J 1 C� .,.it .r+a t and e-0 wIti C7G go. l'/9'9—(O Clad wrw�.b �Y, v � AMi.a r=oQaC R � and r�in Vir la it OF of or maid (v r NS!, '�mania •r`aut.NOE iS RFOL TF9 cast* E• 1,7 hiSILIALEMIEM-EXialg: @,Progressive Casualty Insurance pan 1wry R Mambo of • t` �/ 6300 Wilson Mille Raw h+i+ervi Tamale"tx- ll Mayfield Village,Ohio 44143-2112 OfflatDC'°°ayOw* ^ `"• Attn: Shies Adams,Rat Estata Mager boo t 98014243 2 Rect: 204790 1960.00 4 - r 03/13/1998 11t51rlOam r- SPECIAI„„WAtANTY L7Et D ! i t mot' 1 at Z KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that KEYBANK NATIONAL 1 �\ C`' ASSOCIATION,a national banking association formerly known as Key Bank of Onsgoa,an ! g Oregon banking aesociaamt end having an address on 121 Public Squirt,C1evel nd,Ohio 44t 14 -a Tii (the"Grantor"),for valuable cotts�dcr ton received to its f 11 satisfaction of PROORBSSIV1? r c ° o CASUALTY TNSURANCI?COMPANY,en Ohlo aotporatioo,having an address at Willson a r _0 -- r r Isfills Canlpua,6300 Wilson Mille Road,Mayfield Village,Ohio 44143-2IS2(the"Otantoc'),to N don ha'eby grant,barb ,sell and convey to the said t3ramm that certain real property located l t,•• in the City of Tigard.County of Washington and State of Oregon,and shore particularly Rtc tv o PLANNING N described on the attached Schedule 1 and made a part ttereot(the"Land--r, o+6t �t situated thereon and other rights and JUN 2 8 TOGETHER Wil l'I all build and i 1999 -- privileges thereunto belonging(together with the Land,the°Property*); 1 F SUBJECT TO existing restrictions,easements or other matters of record legal higltweys. CITY OF TIGAR zoning ordinances,teal estate tsxa not yet due and Itsyable,miners which would be reveelod by an accurate survey,the License Agreement dated November, 1996 between(hinto4 sad RFD Publications,Inc-,and those enew:bears=or ex=Kim,to title t1sted on the enacted Schedule 2 and made a part hereof(oollactivaly,the Perrnittad Boeumbrnces"); TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property,with the rights and privileges thereunto belonging.unto the said Orantae,its euoeossors and assigns,forever. And the Grantor specially warrants to the Oran«,its wceesMrc'nd aaai a.that.the Propelty is fret from all encumbrances Mated or suffered by the Grantor,except mid Permirted Encumbrances. The true consideration for this conveyance is 31,600,000. • THIS iNsTnuMPNT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF-II-CS PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN t THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REWLATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE • APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. .,,,,tie, taaaMFtntoA tbanrtr ctravoi:swsot_I WO ,4R awa►lrrrr >tienasl0s tflaZ r ^ • I D0.0 0 0,5� Iw �I.„9 CU PAM Bet •, • • "'_' — .• , .-••— .... . •.--...... . 'I • 1 • 06/23/99 16: 17 G 8. L LAND SURUEY'ING -+ 503 245 7710 NO.22.6 WU� 503 656 5797 15 �6-23 16:05 rr664 P.03/07 FRpM ,:F 1 RST QHER I CAN TITLE IIN WITNESS WHEREOF,KeyBank National Association,the said Grantor,has ciusod WS Limited Warranty Deed to bo duly executed on this 12th day of Merck.1998. Sig l d and acknowledged KBYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION in the pry of: Pri.c-4: 111_1._. : :41r Br);Lx744714/14".74 .... Title � 1 4/4,1647atal nc: .,�, — ti _;u. .;,c, t l And 1t t. c l� . F Or1 -- . ./ / • J I .._. 4 ri mime:- .v• M Title: C]P"t1L'L._ LiY/ j - I . 1 I 1 I , 5797 177•is o-c.� i v FRDr1 FIRST GMERICF7N TITLE 503 556 . . . • STATE OP OHIO ) ) 's• : COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA) -' . BEFORE me,a Notary Ana'In ort4 for said Coact(and Ste, Kc7&Nesional Association,a oa*ions!banking associadott, tts its se e f fug ear was executed,wbo ecknowlcdrid that they d sign the ware for and on behalf of said eescciraloci ad don the same is their free act and deed individually and as such airmen sod the f ci act affi deed of said association. IN TESTIMONY WNEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and official Goal at Cleveland,Ohio this 12th day of March,1995. • Notary Public TAU)irutcmment prepared by-. Stephan C.Miner . ' 1 lanes,1ns,D'7,Ramie k Pogue North Poiat 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland,Ohio 44114 (216)586.3939 l l i . • COMM Z011111 1.r..a 3 • .. .. , . . . . . . . . .. . . . . • . . . . • • . . . . .. . . . . .... .•••_.. _____._. ........._...__-...____.:,,_.. ..... .. A Val BZZ'ON OTLL SVE 205 4- 9NIA3118f15 QNd7 7 '8 9 LI:91 66/2E/90 .RpM .,=I RST MER 1 CPN -;--..E SO3 656 Sly a . = ..r,,o-c. _ . • • • • Schedule I Legal Description PARCEL I; The Easterly 60 feet of tho fuUowing described property; Beginning ate point on the Wert line of Government-Lot 4 in Section 1, Township • 2 South, Range 1 Welt. Willamette Meridian, In the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, which point le South 29 95' 50' West a dtatance of 390.73 feet from the Northwest Center of said Lot 4: said point being the most Westerly Southwest corner of the T &W Equipment Co., at al. Tract recorded September 29. 1966 In Book 616. Pepe 687:thence South 88° 63' East along the South line of sold T&W Tract to the East right-of•way line of Southwest 72nd and the true point of begl,,rrinp; thence continuing South 88° 53'Eaet parallel to the North line of Government Lot 4.a distance of 410.0 fist thence South partnel to the East right-of-way line of Southwest 72nd a distance of 200.0 feet;thence North Site 63'West, parallel to the North One of Government Lot No. 4, a distance of 410.0 feet to the Eaat right-of-way line of 72nd Avenue:thence North along said right-of-wiry line to the true point of beginning. PARCEL ll: . A portion of Tract 4 of the duly recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, situated In the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1. Township 2 South, Range 1 11 West of the Willamette Meridian, In the City of Tigard. County of Washington and State of Oregon. more particularly described as fellows: Beginning at an bon pipe at the Northwest corner of said Tract 4;thence South • 88° 63' 00' teat along the North roe of said Tract 4.a distance of 410.00 feet to an angle point In sold North line;thence South 2° 3:3' 00' West 269.94 feet to e paint: thence North 88° 63' 00" West parallel with the North line of said Tract 4. a distance of 412.04 feet to a point io the East Une of S•W, 72nd Avenue: thence North 3° 00' 00' East along said Lest line. 280.00 feet to the point of beginning. , EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Associated Computer 6ervicee. Inc.. by Deed recorded October 3, 1973 In Book 947, Page 779. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion dedicated to the public by instrument retarded October 13, 1978,as Fee No, 78045484. TOGETHER WITH that portion of roosted S.W. 72nd Avenue that would Inure thereto , by Ordinance No. 82-97 recorded December 15. 1982 as Fee No.62032115, • re-recorded March 16, 1983 as Fee Ne. 83008666 PARCEL III: A portion of Bieck 4, In the duty recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBOMSION, • situated In the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1.Township 2 South, Rsnpo 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon. • • • r ` • CDIf1 f3??-nht_ OTLL SbF 20; +- fNIJ.�f Nf1S CNH7 7 5z n or •n- FROM,:F1 RST AMER 1CQN TITLE 503 656 5757 ,r ,o-,, lG, .• • •room particularly described as follows: ' Gommenclnp at the most Northwesterly comer of SOW Block 4;theaCe South 3° 00' the of West eking bg ing of the tract Iwre7M 72nd be described;N ncetSou 3° 53a the point at beg Inning 41 .eat part with the n a South 2° 33' 00" West,' distance distance 80.08 feet to a point feet to a point; 38' 37' West at right anplea to the ce'dac floe of said a.Wirt:them South 92 S.W. 72nd Avenue, a distance of 186.92 foot to • point In the NoAhvaslsrty line of said S.W. 72nd Avenue:thence North 67° 21' 23' West along said Northeasterly line, a distance of 368.75 feet to an anols point thence North 3° 00' CO' East a diamnce of 45.72 toot to the point of begtnnlog• {• EXCEPTING 9E8, FROM that portion dedicated to the public by instrument recorded EXCEPTING ALSO 14, 882 that No. dedicated to the public by Instrument recorded October TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated S.W.72nd Avenue that would inure thereto by Ordinance No. 62.57 recordod o Na 8.3008858 82 as Fee No. 82032716, re-recorded March 16, 1983 w PARCEL IV: A portion of Lot 4 In the duty recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, attuated in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South. Range 1 West of the Widemetto Meridian.In the City Tigard, County of W.shb gton and Suite of Oregon, more particularly described Bsgtnntng at the moat Southeasterly corner of said Lot 4: thence North Ea t1 1112'10' East,a distance of 260.00 foot sent thence North 1°S12'11Q °47'a distance of 6L00ca t 115.00 feet e a North 88°47'60' West a dlatenca of 3.00 feet to a poi t: feet Na orth rthrt;thence point;thence polrrt•thence North 1°12' 10" East a distance of 23.00 hat to a po North 87°07'30" West, a dlstMcs of 388.88 feat to a point thence South 32°38'37' West,at right angles to tho canter line of S.W.72nd Avenue,a distance of 185.92 foot to a point In the Northeasterly line of saki S.W. 72nd Avenue; to the So South lino of said Lot 4;thence South 88°47'60' East,fa gel said South Una, a distance of 74.27 feet to the point of boginni ng. EXCEPTING to�pnN4 THEREFROM that���fi�dlpted to the public by Instrument recorded ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed by Deed ro Octob Per 20, '1992 In Recorder's Fee No. 92074076 and re-recorded April 8, 1993 No. 93026420. 2 906 8ZZ'ON OTLL SbE 20S - 9NIJ Sf f1S QNd1 1 '8 9 8T :9T 66/2E/92 PRzn_ :FIRST gMER I CON TITLE 503 655 5757 17 1Q -cam "., " ' • •_ ' _ . . � _ r Schedule 2 • Paretit1=1 Encumbrances 1. Regulation,including the power to acquire rights of ways and etuerneau,and to levy assessments of the Unified Sewerage A e.ccy. 2. 15 wide undsrgrotlnd sewer cascmcol Grained by an instrument,i,cludbtg the taa+a and • . provisions thereof.dated August 20, 19'71,recorded on Decantrec 10.1971,in Book 846, Page 621 in foyer of the City of Tigard over Parcels 11,111 and N(which easement we/ partially abandoned by art,nun ient recanted on January 11. 1981 as Fee No. 83000966). 3. Senor osseous as delineated cm the rccareed plat over Parrots 11,111 and TV. 4. 6aaittay sower easemaat ercaiad by an ins!?uattnt,itxluding tae tarns and provisions • thereof,dated Sepoanber 10,1912,racrdnd on December 15,1912,as Recorders Fee No.12032635 in favor of the City of Tigard aver portions of Parcels 11 and W along S.W. 72nd Avenue. • S. tr,gess and egress easement created by at iattrumant.including the uermi and provislans • thereof.dated July 11.1990.recorded on July 20,1990,as Ito:orda'a Fee No.90.33438, r•recorded on September 16,1991 es Rocaedees Fee No.91051178,in favor of adjacent • property owners to the ert_st. • • Oval01:7000 i_i.wo • 2,00 6ZZ 'ON BILL Sb7 cBS r 9N I J.Sf1Zif1S UNd1 7 "8 9 6I :9I 66/2z/90 WIN TRANSMITTAL ■■■ ■■■■■■ • ANKROM MOISAN ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS To: Patty Lunsford RECEIVED PLANNING Date: July 21, 1999 Firm: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. JUL 2 3 1999 AMAA Proj.No. 980101 Tigard, OR 97223 Client Proj.No. Project: Progressive Insurance co OF TIGARD Recipient Phone: We are sending you: Shop Drawings [l Change Order ❑ Prints • Copy of Letter ® Documents ❑ Reproducible Drawings ▪ Specifications ❑ Disks ❑ Other Sent via: ® U.S. Mail Fed-Ex ❑ Pronto ❑ o Fax # Other Total pages faxed: Copies: Dated: Item: 1 3/13/98 Special Warranty Deed. Remarks: Please include with the SDR Submittal 1999-00010, Progressive Insurance. Thank you. Distribution: Harper Houf Righellis /� Q File akek By: David Vonada/el G:\ADMIN\FORMS\TEMPLATE\COMM\Transnew.dot 6720 SW Macadam, Suite 100, Portland,Oregon 97219, 503/245-7100, FAX 503/2457710 Principals: Stewart Ankrom,Thomas Moisan,David N.Vonada,Lorraine Kellow,Jeff Hamilton,Karen Bowery,Chris Dalengas,Jeff Los,Phil Marquis 06/23/99 16 16 G 8, L LAND SURVEYING 503 245 7710 NU. ti 1/01 FQOM...eFIRST OMER1CQN TITLE 503 ES'S 5797 19S ;-23 16:04 it664 P.O2/07 . r• . . . ` t til.14 , 4TATT OF Ort[iOH J c 0 . �County of lifiaktnpton J • laKv a ram and • r a cw� ,. N I.ano sloteeetln��rrna user e Com!NG RET 1itN TO and ithin W o In Welt of of amid AID JNT1L A CHANCE IS REQUESTED. COQ �9 E �� MAIL AX STATPMt?N7S IQ: . _ g qp Pto Iei.vve Casualty tneunrncc Company 3 E t; a. w 1e+ty RF�f�r�Owdyr at �s V 6300 Winton Mills Read Aearawn ra Ind Ex. Mayfield village,Ohio 41143-2182 Oatebc.buraur Atut: Bruce Adana,Real Patera Manager Doe t 98024243 r° ]sect: 204790 1088.00 4 - t- 03/23/1998 11r51110am c r SPFbIALYA AE►l.D a) ; 1 Z 1 . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that KEY13ANK NATIONAL a LJ't ASSOCIATION,a national banking association fnrmerty know as Key Bank of Giegoa,an G = Oregon banking aaaoc.iatiort end having an address at 127 Public Square,Cleveland,Ohio 44114 (the"Grantor°),for valuable wander On received to in Rill satisfaction of PROCRESSIVI! I a o o N( CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,an Ohio ootporanoo,having an odds=at Wilson *- 0 a- I I"' llElls Campos,6300 Wilson Mills Road.Mayfield Village Ohio 44143-11 SZ(the"Grants;"), Oro doe.hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey to the said Grantee that certain reai prepesty located -- N in the City of Tigard.County of Washington and State of Oregon,and more particularly 1. dcecrtbvd on t e attached Schedule 1 and made a Part hereof(the"Land–A i +r n) j pC]?t7;CK W1TI(all buildings and improvements sNd thereon and other rights and g — privileges thereunto belonging(together with the Land,the°Property"); 1 64"' SUBJECT TO existing restrictions,easemeota or other matters of record,legal highways, zoning ordinances,real estate tastes not yet due and payable.erecters which would be revealed by an accurate survey,the License Agreement dated November, 1996 between Grantor and RFD Publications,Inc,and those encumbrances or cxccptiont to title listed on the attached Schedule 2 and made a pan hereof(oolleatively,the'Permitted t3ttrumbranc '): TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Properry,with the rights and privileges thereunto belonging.unto the said Omntee,ita succours and assigns,forever. • And the Grantor specialty warrants to the Grantee,its sueeelmoes sad astegns.that the Property is trot from all encumbrances muted or suffered by the Grantor,except said Permitted Encumbrances. The true consideration for this conveyance is$1,800,000. THIS INSfRUMBI4T 4/I LL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN t THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REAULA11ONS. BEFORE SIGNINO OR ACCF. TING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TTI LE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE ' APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. _„ • , te r COM,.7000)_I WM 0p 11 V I M6TE! CORM( . • I M t ATO' 71ao l,r ,.,. PAM sere—-- 06/23/99 16:17 G & L LAND SURVEYING -' 503 245 7710 NO. 228 D02 FROM :FIRST aimERICAN TITLE 503 656 5797 19E S-23 16:05 n664 P.03/07 ... . i I1N WITNESS WHEREOF,KoyBank National Aawciation,the mid Gunter,has mood LW Limited Wassanty Deed to bo duly executed oo this I2tb day or Much,1998. •. Signed and acknowledged KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION in the pregame of: Psy�, By: , ��t: �'``� Name:�tel 1 SkcJ,L 114 Y. _ . Tl tle: y, d��wgr • t mat glehaikitrod e:•era Jari?1L.tl....rtya� .-.. - / ' ' L And /� cif�cl� P ,.t : . "---a —,4. 1_s �, Name: JY,Nw M. I e t. pci �neme:.1-••....` ..,�....a Title: 5o r,.�.-t.. f/Dr/1!�'i�, 1 1 , t • . aMrei:m isou.a+ro 2 FROr1 •-F IRST AMER I CAN TITLE S03 656 S797 1777.Sao-c.5 io•w -o.,�•• C . • STATE OF OHIO ) • ) SS: • COUNTY OP CUYAHOGA) ' ; BEFORE me,a Notary PU4lic in and for said Comity and SM .pereoa tdd KeyBaak himional Association,a national blanking associatOk its its x fore lag- ern was cxcc iced,who acknowledged that they d sign the same for and on behalf of said assechition and theft the same is their frcc act and deed individually and as such officers fad the firm toot and decd of said sssodstion. • IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my nand and official teal at Cleveland,Ohio this 12th day ofMarch,1998, Hotter Public This instrument prepared Stephen C.Mister • fetes,Day,Reavis&Pogue North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cievdartd,Ohio 44114 (216)$B6.3939 CLAIM:ZOnsri .wro 3 3 : • ... . . . . . , . . . . . • , • . • . . . . • . .... ..... _. ......._...__..____. . .______._,,.___ .,.._........ •, .. . . • , . • . . • . . . . .„ • . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ., . . •. • . • • . • . . . . . . • • • . • . . • . •• •....••■....r.• ..........• ■•••• ro •••■••■••••■••••• 1706 8ZZ'ON 21ILL St7E 2O I- 9N I A3r1bf1S CNd1 7 8 9 L T :9T 66i2Zi921 FROM :FIRST aMER 1 CtaN T;TL-E 503 655 5757 •»>• uo-..;, .o ...+ •,.__ Schedutc I Lcgal Descripti on PARCEL I: The Easterly 60 feet of tho following described property: • Beginning at a point on the Weal Ilne of Government-Lot 4 In Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West. Willamette Meridian, In the City of Tigard. County of • Washington and State of Oregon, which point I.South 2° 35' 50' West a distance • of 390.73 feet from the Northwest corner of said Lot 4: said point being the most Westerly Southwest corner of the T & W Equipment Co., at 31.Tract recorded • • September 29, 1966 In Book 616. Page 687; thence South 08° 63' het along the South line of said T&W Tract to the East rigght-of•way fine of Southwest 72nd and the true point of begir,nin ;thence continuing South 80° 53'East parallel to the North line of Government Lot 4. a distance or 410.0 feat;thence South parallel to the East right-of-way Me of Southwest 72nd a distance of 200.0 feet;thence North 88° 63'West, parallel to the North line of Government Lot No. 4, a distance of 410.0 feet to the Earn right-of-way Urns of 72nd Avenue:thence I North along geld right-of-way line to the true point of beginning. PARCEL II: I 1. A portion of Tract 4 at the duly recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, situated In the Southeast or r•quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard. County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an Iron pipe et the Northwest corner of Bald Tract 4;thence South 88° 63' 00' East along the North line of said Tract 4,a distance of 410.00 feet to an angle point in said North line;thence South 2° 33' 00' West 269.94 feet to a point: thence North 88° 53' 00' West parallel with the North tins of said Tract • 4. a dhtance of 41204 feet to a point in the East line of S.W. 72nd Avenue; • thence North 3° 00' 00' East along said East ane. 260.00 feet to the point of beginning. ■ . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Asaociatad Computer Services. Inc., by Deed recorded October 3, 1973 In Book 947, Page 778. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion dedicated to the public by instrument recorded October 13, 1978,Be Foe No. 78048494. . TOGETHER WTTN that po rtion of raoetnd S.W. 72nd Avenue that would inure therein by Ordlnance No.82-57 recorded December 18. 1882 as Fee No.62032716, ., re-recorded Match 16, 1583 ss Fse No. 83008856 PARCEL Ili: • A portion of Block 4, In the duty recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, • situated In the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South, Rengo 1 , . West of the Wlllemettta Meridian, In the County of Washington and State of Oregon, • . .�a _. - ' SOD 9EE'ON OTLL SPE £0S . 9NIA9(i f1S CNd7 7 8 9 8T :9T 66/2E/90 RCM ;FIRST PMER1CQN TITLE S03 656 5797 1777•vo-cam io•vv -• .- • • • more protiCUiarlY described es follows: • Commencing of the most Northwoster+it comer of Said block 4;thoncw South 3° 00' 00" West liking tho East line of S.W, 72nd Avenue,m distance of 260.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract herein to be described;thence South 88° 53' 00' East p■rmAol with the most Northerly in of raid Stook 4, a diatsnoe of 412.04 fast to a point; thence South 2" 33' 00' West,a distance of 80.08 feet to _, a point;thence South 320 38' 97 West at right angles to the carder tine of said S.W. 72nd Avenue. a distance of 186.92 feet to a point In the Northeasterly line of Sold S.W.72nd Avenue:thence North 67° 21' 23' West along said Northeasterly • '• line. act et 45.72 3b8.7 the point an of nale point thanes North 3° 00' 00' East a EXCEPTING E , e THEREFROM Fee Not portion 9a.�ted to the public by instrument recorded Octobor ALSO EXCEPTING that portion dedicated to the public by Instrument recorded October 14, 1982 es Fee No. 82026857. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated S.W. 77nd Avenue that would inure thereto ray Orddln March 82.6 roc rd fee No�8300866g 1982 as Fee No. 82032716, ' PARCEL IV: A portion of Lot 4 In the duty recorded plat of SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION. sltueted in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1.Township 2 South. Range 1 Woo to of 0 p rte, more particularly l .in dthe City of Tigard, od, County of WsshR+gton and Begfru ng at the most Southeasterly corner of said Lot 4; thence North 1°12'10' • ft East. a distance of 260.00 feet to a point; thence South 88°47'50' East, a distance of 115.00 feet to a point:thence North 1°12'10' East a distance of 67.00 foot to a point: thence North 88°47'60" West. a dietsnce of 3.00 feet to o point;thepGe North 1°12' 10" East,a distance of 23.00 feet to a point;thence • North 97007'30' West, a distance of 398.96 feet to a paint thence South 32°38'37' West,at right angles to the centre line of S.W.72nd Avenue,a ' distance of 186.92 foot to a point In the Northeasterly line of said S.W. 72nd Avenue; thence South 67°Z1'23` East,along geld Northeasterly line. a distance of sald.South line, distance of 74.27 feet tto the point of bog Inning. East. along E EXCEPTING S1S1 EREF OM Not pardon dedicated to the public by Instrument recorded ALSO EXCEPTING T I4EREFROM that portion conveyed by Deed recorded October 20, 1992 , In Recorder's Fee No. 92074075 and re-recorded April 6, 1993 in Recorder's Pee • No. 93026420. • 2 5 « • . 90a BEE 'ON aTz,L Sb? 23S - JN I 1Sr f1S UNd1 7 2 S 81; :91 66/ZE/90 F'Rpr1 :F 1 RST ''ER 1 CoN TITLE 503 656 5757 I ow•roe- .., �o•" • Sttbodule 2 Perini ttod E.neambra ices 1. Replebon„including the power to acquire tights of ways sad casements,sad to levy aasessmonte of the Unified Sevt c AVcacy. 2. 15'wide underground sewer casancal created by an instrwi'icitt,including rho coma and provisieru thereof dated August 20,1971,r cotdtd on Decciatct 10, 1971,in Bonk 646, Page 621 in taunt oldie City of Tigx►d over Parcels 11,111 and tV(which eszemeni was . partially abandoned by an instrument ry arded on January 11. 1983 as Fee No. B3000966). 3. Sower easements as delineated on the recorded piss over Pascals[l,III end N. 4. Sanitary souse easemoat crested by an instrument.including lac tots aid provisions ' thsseof.dated Sepa+rnber 10,19112,recanted on December 15,19E2,sa Retarders Fee No.82032635 in favor of the City of Tigard over portiorts of Patois II and W along S.W. 72nd Av,anuc. . S. ingress and egress easement created by an it truraant,including the tenno and provlgIwt thereof.doted July 11.1990,recorded on July 20,1 990,so Pcc rdds Fee No.90.33438, ro-raoorded on Septarnber 16,1991 as Recorder's Fee No.91051178,in favor of adjsuestt . property owners to the west. watt&2rossi_Ltvan • • • L0l SEE 'ON BTLL St'? 23S * SNIe 31.)elf1S QNd-1 -1 8 S 6T:9T 66i2Zi90 NE¢p�AIMING MEM TRANSMITTAL ■:7■ JUN 2 81999 NEN ANKROM CSPFOISAN ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS To: Patty Lunsford Date: June 23, 1999 Firm: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. AMAA Proj.No. 980101 Tigard, OR 97223 Client Proj.No. Project: Progressive Insurance Recipient Phone: We are sending you: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Change Order ❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Documents ❑ Reproducible Drawings ❑ Specifications ❑ Disks ® Other Envelopes Sent via: ® U.S. Mail ❑ Fed-Ex ❑ Pronto ❑ ❑ Fax # other Total pages faxed: Copies: Dated: Item: 2 Pre-Addressed, Stamped, Legal Envelopes. 1 Construction Cost Estimate. Remarks: For your use/distribution. Distribution: File By: David Vonada/el G:\ADM1N\FORMS\TEMPLATE\COMM\Transnew.dot 6720 SW Macadam, Suite 100, Portland,Oregon 97219, 503/245-7100, FAX 503/2457710 Principals: Stewart Ankrom,Thomas Moisan,David N.Vonada,Lorraine Kellow,Jeff Hamilton,Karen Bowery,Chris Dalengas,Jeff Los,Phil Marquis . r CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE PARKING LOT 1 I 3/2/99 UNIT ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS _ _ GRADING _ ***** L.S. ***** _$15,000 PAVEMENT 12,320 S.F. $2.00 $24,640 RETAINING WALL 1,500 S.F. $20.00 $30,000 CURB 660 L.F. $2.50 $1,650 STORM PIPE 210 L.F. $25.00 $5,250 RIP RAP ***** L.S. ***** $100 CATCH BASIN 2 EA. $750.00 $1,500 CONNECT TO EXIST 1 EA. $250.00 $250 TREES 38 EA. $200.00 $7,600 BUSHES 45 EA. $15.00 $675 EROSION CONTROL ***** L.S. ***** $1,000 STRIPING 570 _ L.F. $0.20 $114 STAIRWAY ***** L.S. ***** $1,500 I I TOTAL $89,279 72nd AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS GRADING ***** L.S. ***** $1,500 SIDEWALK 3,420 I S.F. $2.00 $6,840 DRIVEWAY APRON 240 S.F. $3.00 $720 RETAINING CURB 435 L.F. $15.00 $6,525 TREES 7 EA. $200.00 $1,400 TOTAL $16,985 C o ')4( e„...cits 126, . ow-R. teS.4( '2,00 4400 titCY /2P(617C -05Nf "r4i rtogo4e4A WY' 644:adeek trAKM0W 0.1190Zatir■CAN 1\NAA)44--- . Oqq9 - °°°1° ANKROM MOISAN ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 6720 s.w. adam Suite too Portland,Oregon 97219 503/245-7100,EX 503/245-7710 David N. Vonada, A.I . ' • .... Principal r ii �-_ CITY of TIGARD PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS NOTIFICATION 1 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA MAP! I AREA NOTIFIED y I _ t S 500') I FIR LP TO: David N. Vonada__ ,II -. Ankrom Molsan Assoc. IIIII Z all ^r `3> Architects • 4 �.� __—. 751010003103 FAX 245-7710 251010000400 2S100ID01100 as1018003700 s51010000200 , 7519101100100 2 y Dcola2oo 10,U 2510o 10006200 S1010003702 II 2510111044800 f SANDBURG 1_L i 151010000101 RE: 2 S I 0 I D C ST �_....._ Tax Lots 03 900 & 04100 251001003001 1 I Z •�� � 2 SUBJEC PS1010 0 0 3 8 00 251010000300 251010000401 251010000400 SITES 251010004002 75101008460 _ S 1999-00010 PR OGRESSIVE CASUALTY INS. 257510101:100701�\ TECH CENTER 251010000102 251010804000 251010001100 251010000703 4 251010000900 251010000800 251010000900 2s,o1DDOl000 2511211900300 2S112A800100 �• PS1114800400 1S112A800200 f AF .4 % n1124400900 -1 2• �^ 251120800600 Yy .4n 0 200 400 600 Feet , -o T , 1"=466 feet i Y 'O h 11111 ill 1 o i .. City of Tigard I I Information on this map is for general location only and should be vented with the Development Services Division. r-- �� 'TA RD \ 1 i ar,OR Hall 9223d ( Tigard,OR 97223 11 Ii } I I (503)6i Cigar 1 1\ httpahrnw.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 16, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S101 DC-00400 2S 101 DC-00900 PACIFIC NW PROPERTIES LP HICKETHIER LILLIAN M 9950,SW ARCTIC DR 9220 NW LOVEJOY BEAVERTON, OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S101DC-01100 • 101DC-01300 CIRCLE A W PRODUCTS COMPANY JOL WAYNE ' • &JOYCE YVONNE 509 W MONROE ST 7410 S I.. RRY DR HIGHLAND, IL 62249 :•RD,OR 9 •_3 2S101 DC-03700 25101 DC-03702 UNITED FOOD&COMMERICAL WORKERS LJ PROPERTIES& PO BOX 23555 7185 SW SANDBURG RD TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 DC-03703 2S 101 DC-03800 BECK TOM L MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T 13500 SW 72ND AVE 7415 FAIRWAY LOOP PORTLAND, OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S101DC-03801 1DC-03900 PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY PROGR VES.A3LrAITY 6300 WILSON MILLS RD 6300 WILSON RD MAYFIELD VILLAGE,OH 44143 MAYFIELD VILLAGE,0 4143 2S 101 DC-04000 101 DC-04100 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP PRO -- SIV • " SALTY 4380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 6300 "• - S RD PORTLAND,OR 97201 • FIELD VILLAGE, • 44143 25101 DC-04602 2S101 DC-04603 MCCORMACK WILLIAM L&DARLENE T WATUMULL PROPERTIES CORP 7190 SW SANDBURG ST 307 LEWERS ST#6FLR TIGARD, OR 97223 HONOLULU, HI 96815 2S101 DC-04800 01 DC-06200 JOLLY WAYNE RAY&JOYCE YVONNE 72ND'-. E LLC 7410 SW CHERRY DR 7401 : C CRY ST TIGARD, OR 97223 '•RTLAND,OR • 23 2S101DC-06300 2S101DD-00100 72ND VENTURE LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES& 7400 SW CHERRY ST PO BOX 407 PORTLAND,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97440 2S101DD-00101 2S101DD-00200 WESTON HOLDING CO LLC PAPE'PROPERTIES INC 2154 NE BROADWAY 91434 COBURG INDUSTRIAL WAY PORTLAND,OR 97232 COBURG,OR 97440 2S101DD-00300 2S101DD-00400 HAYTER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHI TOC MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 23643 SW STAFFORD HILLS DR 6825 SW SANDBERG ST WEST LINN, OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 DD-00401 fkS.L01 DD-00700 NORTHWEST MEDICAL TEAMS PROG- IV SALTY PO BOX 10 6300W •SN • - SRD PORTLAND, OR 97207 M. FIELD VILLAGE, • 44143 2S101DD-00701 2S101DD-00702 RFD PUBLICATIONS INC J&K PROPERTIES CORP 9600 SW BOECKMAN 6900 SW SANDBURG RD WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S101 DD-00703 2S101 DD-00800 TARKIAINEN REINO J A AND I S PROPERTIES LP 20895 SW LEBEAU RD PO BOX 87908 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 VANCOUVER,WA 98687 2 61DD-00900 2S101DD-01000 TARKI• N RE ■ : A AND LEEK GEORGE W 20895 S - • RD 1515 SE HAWTHORNE -WOOD, OR 97 •I PORTLAND,OR 97214 2$101 DD-01100 2S 112AA-00900 PA- ' -ROP S INC SPIEi( R PROPS: - LP 91434 s:.;G INDUSTRIAL WAY 4380 S "••-•-=DAM AVE STE 100 :URG, OR 9 • ' P• LAND,OR 9 01 2S112AB-00100 2S112AB-00200 SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC WARNE MARJORY ETHEL 4444 NW YEON 2917 SW WESTVIEW CIRCLE PORTLAND, OR 97210 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S112AB-00300 2S112AB-00400 HICKS PRENTISS C HA - - FAttL LIMLTED PARTNERSHI PO BOX 23633 2 •• &FFORD HILLS DR TIGARD, OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR • 668 2S112AB-00600 TUFFORD PHYLLIS J TRUSTEE 4836 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97206 06/16/99 17:00 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD Q001 ************************:{:** *** ACTIVITY REPORT **a: ***:3******•I•..•E.******•YlY4'*.{..4.y: • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RI NO. 6646 CONNECTION TEL 503 245 7710 CONNECTION ID START TIME 06/16 16:59 USAGE TIME 01'25 PAGES 3 RESULT OK o •- -{ , _ __1 73 _ P3 D m "Cl mo —_. N.) 73 _ t_.. 5---------1/ C/) _A � m � M C --f■-•,..—■.— _'' 01 03 __ --) x 0 - -' / C7 I 1 E „ : HH a � —.7,....s; 1 a f- ! , , f- - �- _� -., 1.• ' . : : • 1 lk,:..i•.. . .,...a7. E ___ _ _ "� � ; _1 • 0 co > < 1 d „ ' 72ND ; V i - . =1 i jo-zt,p-,/,,,;, —,.:...'.- I- ,'., '--; .':•:,- 0 1 .__,- r . i 1.____ i _ 0, _ . __,,, r____ __,_ .Emmumm_." _ _i ! . . . ,... 0) I -71 1 xi , 0. , . .1 'A , .. . . . opp■ ''s.'..,„'''. ,.._ _\_ _ _ . . . • • ._.--- Y ri - , ei-71,49.. Ax$- yam, , ?vcsuriag._ . , . kt «sm,,,5 k.y tom„1/4 U:Xt-r2 '1,00 4i00 map viacc its( um.. Pw, q,.9 mot' 6..ervretrA raS.cw u�ppkmlzov. . 1\i4v4-- � yA2J- Ox-c,L4+1/414k ,c —i-D0q9s9 - 000/0 (Piogres57re 08/31/1999 TUE 11:32 FAX 17/1001/015 I 'uSl i1M�f;nf}tlf.... .+4�fN8i!!J°,�M'N'�lPnrrrlthrlSfrhd IW.iR'r"�Ofw SNI'"�',W1(11�Trry}hS.urmM h� pv 1S+r r+u n i r^rnn.nun�r a rrr ��. ��n ��,i A r �lA' �Mr uu•r:�� F'. ,;,r,hT�i'� � �� ,N:r�a„rlrlr,r�.r i EI Nit tit}11+;,n 1 � 1��i�,WfG Job No. - ANit — 44- Date - g/5/ /q To - From - C1/174J 4cM1 0A, TL S rper . Houf lghellis, Inc. 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 503,221.1171 FAX 503,221.1131 Project/Subject - 77 11 V 5 ((/€ c..l 0e7A e- 1 X.4 as requested for your information for your approval for your review return requested other here' , D•BL,1 :';: '': //„ Dascrip2ipn ./ �r tidj /. °a' 641 2,10-11 4. 3 Comment's' • FAX NUMBER: /„/� 4. 7 Ct� NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: j.„5-”" l/s/i/yv� IF';Y'„QU.;D1D„Nat'RECgliiikaj 08/31/1999 TUE 11:33 FAX 0002/015 Appendix A Geotechnical Engineers Letter Yt" 08 '31/1999 TUE 11:33 FAX j003 015 GEODESiGN , INC . GEOTECHNICAL. ENVIR ONMENTAI., AND GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS January 26, 1999 Harper, Houf, Righellis, Inc. 5200 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 580 Portland, Oregon 97201 Attention: Mr, Gary Alfson Geotechnical Engineering Services Progressive Insurance Tigard, Oregon GDI Project: Progressive-1 INTRODUCTION We are pleased to submit this report providing geotechnical recommendations for the proposed parking lot addition at the Progressive Insurance site. The site is located southwest of the intersection between SW 72'Avenue and SW Sandburg Street in Tigard, Oregon. Our involvement with the project is limited to providing geotechnical engineering recommendations as they relate to the City of Tigard's requirements for developing "sensitive lands' at the site. A copy of the City of Tigard's Code relating to sensitive lands as well as a site and grading plan was provided to us by Mr. Gary Alfson of Harper, Houf, Righellis, Inc. (HHR). "Sensitive lands." as defined by the City, represent slopes at inclinations greater than 25 percent. The current plans are to construct an approximately 0.3-acre parking lot south of the existing Progressive Insurance building. An approximate 675-square-foot maintenance garage will be constructed at the southeast corner of the parking lot. Based on the grading plan, the majority of the site development will require cuts ranging in depths up to 6 feet and short retaining walls. Minor fills will be required at the southwest corner of the proposed parking lot. SCOPE The purpose of our services was to evaluate the "sensitive lands" at the site relative to the proposed development. This evaluation was based on our experience in the area, a site reconnaissance and review of available information. The specific scope of services for the geotechnical engineering study includes: • Research and review information concerning previous geological and geotechnical studies conducted for sites near the subject site. • Conduct one site visit to complete a surface reconnaissance of the site. • Provide a short letter report summarizing the results of our evaluation. 17400 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd., Suite 230 • Portland, Oregon 97224 • Phone (503) 968-8787 • Fax (503) 968-3068 08.31.1999 TUE 11:34 FAX 001 015 • SITE CONDITIONS We completed a surface reconnaissance of the site on January 11, 1999. Site vegetation consists of relatively thick grasses and shrubs as well as occasional deciduous trees. The existing ground surface of the proposed parking lot slopes downward toward the south. The slopes over the majority of the area are relatively gentle, generally less than 10H:1 V (horizontal:vertical). However, slopes greater than the City of Tigard's "sensitive lands" criteria of 25 percent (4H:1 V), are present at the southwest and southeast corner of the proposed parking lot. Based on HHR's site plan, the amount of area contained in the southwest and southeast areas is approximately 750 and 550 square feet, respectively. Subsurface explorations were not completed for this project. However, Mr. George Saunders of GeoDesign completed subsurface explorations at the adjacent eastern site formally know as the RFD Publications facility. Subsurface conditions at the RFD site consisted of variable amounts (approximately 20 to 35 feet) of medium stiff to stiff silt underlain by basalt bedrock. CONCLUSIONS Article B from page 187 of the City of Tigard's Code states that the °...Director shall approve or approve with conditions an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25 percent or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied." The criteria presented in the City of Tigard's Code as well as our comments are provided below, 1. "The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use. It is our opinion that the proposed development will not disturb the site to an extent greater than that typical of parking lots constructed on gently sloping terrain. Moreover, because the parking lot will be constructed using primarily cuts and short retaining walls, disturbance to the site is anticipated to be lower than a balanced cut and fill approach. 2. "The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse onsite and offsite effects or hazards to life or property." It is our opinion that proposed development will not result in ground instability or other adverse onsite and offsite effects or hazards of life or property. In fact, constructing the facility with primarily cut will unload the moderate slopes below the proposed parking lot and improve the overall stability. Provided adequate construction erosion measures are implemented, the proposed parking It should not increase site erosion or stream sedimentation during construction. The completed project will route water to catch basins and reduce the amount of surface erosion. GeoDesign, Inc. 2 Progressive`1:012699 08,'31.1999 TUE 11:34 FAX Ij005. 015 3. "The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capacity; compressible/organic; and shallow depth to rock." Based on our experience and details of the proposed site and grading plan, it is our opinion that wet/high water table, high shrink-swell soils, compressible/organic soils, or shallow bedrock are not a design consideration for this project. 4. "Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening." A geotechnical engineering comment is not necessary on this criterion. Refer to the project plans for conformance with Chapter 18.100. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this preliminary report for use by Harper, Houf, Righellis, Inc., Progressive Insurance, and other members of the design and construction team. This report presents limited geotechnical engineering evaluation of the proposed parking lot addition at the Progressive Insurance site as it relates to the City of Tigard's requirements for developing "sensitive lands." The scope of our evaluation was limited to review of available previous geological and geotechnical studies conducted for sites near the subject site, a ground-level reconnaissance, our experience in the area, and review of the proposed site plan. Accordingly, a full geotechnical engineering evaluation of the site was not conducted. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. • • • GeoDesign, Inc. 3 Progressive-1:012699 08/31/1999 TUE 11:35 FAX 11006-'015 We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please call if you have questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services Sincerely, GeoDesign, Inc. (/ GE;i :%\A gzetcLcCA.J.1.1,6- 11,1„... g OP j&o George Saunders, P.E. .��r �p Q Principal t5. �� F Q. Sik‘Sv. GPS:kt El?ircS �1'l,00O Document ID: Progressive-1-geop Four copies submitted GeoDesign, Inc. 4 Progressive-1:012699 08/31/1999 TUE 11:35 FAX a007/015 Appendix B Arborist Letter Fi / 08/31/1999 TUE 11:35 FAX a008/015 COLLIER Professional Tree, Shrub, &Lawn (=arc Since 1937 ARBOR CARE 9032 SE Division, Portland, Oregon 97266-1449 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE TREE REPORT PREPARED FOR Mike Pruett Harper Houf Righellis PREPARED BY Terrill Collier Certified Arborist March 12, 1999 © Collier Arbor Care 1999 Portland(503)774-9642 • Vancouver(360) 693-6056 • FAX(503)774-7932 Prinred on recycled paper 08/31/1999 TUE 11:36 FAX l]009/015 • s COLLIER Professional Tree, Shrub, & Lawn Care Since 1937 ARBOR CARE 9032 S.F.Division, Portland, Oregon 97266-1449 March 11, 1999 Mr. Mike Pruett A.I.C_P. Harper I-Jouf Righellis 5200 SW Macadam Suite 580 Portland, Or 97201 Re: Tree Preservation plan for Progressive Insurance Co.parking lot expansion at SW 72nd Ave. Tigard, Or. Dear Mr. Pruett, At your request, I am to conduct a tree health assessment and prepare a tree preservation plan for the Progressive Insurance parking lot expansion at the above address. I am to make recommendations as to which trees are good candidates to retain in the landscape. The trees will be identified according to species and are located on a site plan you have provided me. Trees, 12" in diameter and larger will be inspected. I will provide a tree preservation plan to help protect the trees designated to be retained during construction. SUMMARY There are 21 trees on the site greater than 12" in diameter. There are 13 trees recommended to be retained and 8 trees for removal due to being located within the parking lot construction area. Native trees and shrubs such as: Garry oak and red alder are recommended to be planted in the open space area. A Tree Preservation Plan is recommended to help protect the trees during construction. Portland (503)774-9642 • Vancouver(360)(593-6056 • FAX(503)774-7932 Printed nn recycled paper 08/31/1999 TUE 11:36 FAX f )010/015 Progressive Insurance Tree Preservation Plan Page 2 of 4 OBSERVATIONS I examined the 3.6 acre site on 2/1/99. The proposed parking lot expansion is to the south of the existing Progressive Insurance building. The site slopes to the southwest toward SW 72"d Ave .The existing vegetation on the site consists mainly of pioneer type trees that have grown back since the site was previously cleared. The tree species found are Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra `Italica'), cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), willow (Salix spp.), alder (Alnus rubra) and Garry oak (Quercus garryana). The under-brush consists of blackberries, hazelnut, and grasses. The steep southwest-facing slope is hot and dry during the summer favoring plant species tolerant of these conditions. On the northern edge of the proposed parking lot, Scot's pine (Pinus sylvestris), and red oak have been previously planted. The Scot's pine will be retained in a buffer strip on the northern edge of the parking lot. There will be a retaining wall between the buffer strip and the new parking lot. A two-trunked willow with some crown dieback is recommended for removal because of construction conflict with the retaining wall. There will be six trees, over 12" in diameter, removed due to an unavoidable construction conflict with the proposed parking lot. To the south of the new parking lot a bio-swale will be constructed necessitating the removal of several smaller trees. There are 21 trees on the site over 12" in diameter. Of these trees, 13 are recommended for preservation and 8 are recommended for removal due to construction conflicts. DISCUSSION One of the best methods for preserving trees is saving trees in groups or groves. This allows for preservation of large soil areas for root preservation. This gives the trees the best chance at long-term survival. The buffer-strip where the Scot's pines are located is an excellent example of preserving trees in a group to help insure their long-term survival. • ©Collier Arbor Care 03/12/99 08/31/1999 TUE 11:37 FAX 2011/015 Progressive Insurance free Preservation Plan Page 3 of 4 GRADING AND CONTRUCTION AFFECTS ON TREES Grading and trenching can negatively affect the health and anchorage of a tree's root system. Trenching can sever roots resulting in loss of anchorage and increasing the potential for wind-throw. Cutting the roots results in the loss of ability to absorb water and nutrients. Substantial root loss decreases the potential for a tree's long-term survival or eventually may cause death. Lowering grades results in the removal of roots. Raising grades leads to root suffocation and susceptibility to root rots. As little as 6 inches of soil fill over a tree's root zone can eventually suffocate roots and cause tree death. MITIGATION OF CONSTRUCTION AFFECTS ON TREES There arc several techniques for mitigating and preventing construction affects on trees (Appendix#1 Tree Preservation Specifications). Some of these include: • Establish a tree protection zone with protective fencing to preserve root systems. This prohibits trenching, grading, and other construction activities within the tree preservation zone without the supervision of the consulting arborist. • When trenching is required,tunnel under roots instead of cutting them. • Use retaining walls when change of grade is required in tree root zones. This technique will be used for the Scot's pine trees in the buffer-strip area. • Subsurface fertilization using root stimulation materials to help trees replace lost roots. NATIVE TREE PLANTING The lower half of the site consists of a number of small undesirable non-native tree and shrub species such as: poplars, hawthorns, blackberries etc. I am recommending the removal of the undesirable non-native vegetation, and replanting with native trees and shrubs adapted to the site conditions. A native oak woodland with native plants underneath would be well adapted to the existing site conditions. Trees such as: Garry oak and red alder would be good species. Shrubs such as: serviceberry, snowberry, and Oregon grape arc good companion species. ©Collier Arbor Care 03/12/99 08/31/1999 TUE 11:37 FAX Z012/015 . Progressive Insurance Tree Preservation Plan Page 4 of 4 CONCLUSION The tree preservation plan takes into consideration saving the maximum number of trees that have the highest chance of survival, and do not pose an unreasonable risk of hazard to people and property. The trees recommended to be saved, are good candidates to retain in the landscape. The trees recommended for removal have unavoidable construction conflicts. RECOMMENDATIONS • Implement the Tree Preservation Plan (Appendix #1) under the supervision of the consulting arborist. • Preserve trees in a group as shown on the plan (Appendix#2 Landscape Plan). • Prune the pine trees by the parking lot to remove deadwood and remove lower branches to give an 11' clearance over the parking areas. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the arborist can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The information contained in this report reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees in question may not arise in the future. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Submitted by, Terrill Collier Certified Arborist Appendix#1 Tree Preservation Plan Appendix #2 Landscape and Mitigation Plan ©Collier Arbor Care 03/12/99 08/31/1999 TUE 11:37 FAX Z013/015 Progessive Insurance Trcc Preservation Plan Page I of 2 Appendix I TREE PRESERVATION SPECIFICATIONS 1. The site clearing contractor is required to meet with the consulting arborist at the site prior to beginning work to review all work procedures, access and haul routes, and tree protection measures. 2. Establish a Tree Protection Zone as directed by the consulting arborist to protect and preserve the tree and it's root system. Install temporary protective fencing such as; chain link or snow fencing affixed to metal "T" posts to establish a Tree Protection Zone. Place the protective fencing around the edge of the drip line (the area below the spread of the branches) of the tree. For trees with narrow growth habit, the Tree Protection Zone extends beyond the drip line and the fencing shall be placed under direction of the consulting arborist. Tree Protection Zones will be established prior to construction. 3. Construction activities within the Tree Protection Zone are prohibited except by permission and supervision of the consulting arborist. Contractor will contact the consulting arborist (Terrill Collier) beforehand, for construction of path, roads within the Tree Protection Zone. 4. Protect the tree against cutting, skinning or breaking of branches,trunk and roots. 5. Stockpiling of materials, vehicle operation, and parking is prohibited in the Tree Protection Zone. 6. Maintain existing grade within the Tree Protection Zone. Raising or lowering grades are prohibited except as permitted by and under the supervision of the consulting arborist. Final grades may need to be adjusted from what is shown on the grading plan to further protect trees. Contractor shall contact the consulting arborist for recommendation where trees being saved or potentially saved conflict with grading. 7. Removal of branches or root pruning of trees to remain is to be performed by a qualified arborist under the supervision of the consulting arborist. 8. Pruning - trees shall be pruned prior to the start of construction. Trees shall be crown cleaned to remove the deadwood 2 inches in diameter and over. Trees shall be crown thinned by 10-20%. Under the direction of the consulting arborist crowns may be raised by removing bottom branches as necessary up to 14 feet high to give clearance for any construction activities, traffic, etc. All work to be done in accordance with International Society of Arboriculture pruning standards. 9. Cut branches and root with sharp pruning instruments that do not chop or tear. ©Collier Arbor Care,Inc. 03/12/99 08/31/1999 TUE 11:38 FAX 0014/015 • • Progessive Insurance Tree Preservation Plan Page 2 of 2 Appendix 1 10. Excavation and trenching around tree roots within the Tree Protection Zone is prohibited except by permission and under the supervision of the consulting arborist. 11. When trenching is required within the dripline of the tree, tunnel under roots by hand digging. Do not cut roots larger than 4 inches in diameter. Cut smaller roots only if they interfere with new work and only with a sharp instrument. 12. Do not allow any exposed or cut roots to dry out before permanent backfill is placed. Provide a temporary earth cover or mulch to keep exposed roots moist until permanent backfill is placed. 13. Any damage to trees during construction activities shall be reported to the consulting arborist within 6 hours so that remedial action can be taken. Timeliness is critical to the tree health. 14. Water trees which are to remain. as necessary to maintain their health during the course of construction. 15. Fertilizing - the trees shall be subsurface fertilized with a complete slow release fertilizer and a root stimulant to promote good health and vigor. Initial fertilizing should be done prior to starting of the construction and continue annually for at least 3 years. 16. Contractor is responsible for any and all damage to the tree during the course of construction. The contractor shall pay to the tree owner the value of the damaged tree as established by the consulting arborist. 4'Collicr Arbor Care,Inc. 03/12/99 08/31/1999 TUE 11:38 FAX l 015/015 Progressive Insurance Landscape and Mitigation Plan Page 1 of I ' Appendix 2 er,cc ._._ ._ g / ..-._. -0- --„ • r . •• • il 7 V■ l Ash el it,.1 , . r l°' it 'a' So o d \. .. r� 0 1 , 1 qi!ii sep®. ,_;-,,,,,i ii ,___ vi. .1 1 iii ?Ivo ii iittli - rl I !ill $ O;I_: E1 I •• • I _: 2111 lI . . . . .� l jr 1 z r j 1 I I 5. .. P P1' I 'i I ti- r1 OA' a., D �C8 .r' PROrR(5sIp INSURANCE'CO. it MI � nraiR ash ... w !. . �...'...� ©Collier Arbor Care, Inc. 03/11/99 0714/1999 WED 20:34 FAX Z001/006 Fax "Trar � ,, Job No. - 4/0g_ - ¢' Date - .?/f 4/99 L To - M '/t From -6-AP/ itr" ...4.1. e)r-( i)drot arper . Houf 1ghellis, Inc, 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 503,22211.117771 FAX 503.221.1131 Project/Subject as requested for our information Y for your approval for your review return requested other Item. Date Description Sze- • I • /1 1 ' PiL✓I ' r die ria/LLa.I[ti1L LI L/_, / � /46 LAi _ _A / / irG: PI, _' o L I.f ':/ / / 7L15 aJ7L- ) , •_/,‘ #7/ -/-/--/-6 472))/7--- Vie (AA_ . FAX NUMBER: be/ 7Zq NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: alp IF You D1p NOTRECEIVE THE,. O ECT NUMBER.00 P AGES,!∎PLEASE CALL,, 07/14/1999 WED 20:34 FAX Z002/006 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS July 14, 1999 Location: 72ND Avenue Tigard, Oregon Prepared by: Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. 5200 SW MACDAM AVENUE-SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 503-221-1131 Gary Alfson 07•%1.x/1999 WED 20:35 FAX ]003/006 PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE STORM DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The storm runoff from the new parking lot and garage structure is proposed to be directed to the water quality swale. The treatment volume and the 25 year volume calculations are provided in the attached sheets. We propose to direct all the flow to the swale as the velocity and depth of the 25 year flow will less than the allowed maximums. Additional narrative will follow with the submittal of the street opening permit application. 07/1.4/1999 WED 20:35 FAX 0004/006 Progressive Insurance Water d uality Swale Treatment Flow Man Made Channels — English Units Civil Tools for Windows (01-06-1999, 15:26:49) Flow Depth = 0.053 ft Flowrate = 0.026 cfs Channel Bottom Width = 4.000 ft Channel Side Slope = 4.000 ft/ft Channel Slope = 0.02000 ft/ft Channel Roughness = 0.250 Wetted Area = 0 ,23 sf • Wetted Perimeter - 4 .44 ft Velocity = 0.12 fps Froude No. = 0.09 Flow = Sub-Critical igt1466111 . 44/;t•G /610 � 01 � Ivv � � lei 5-85 0f 564' 1; r0C • lZk4ox66) x D , ozC' c 07/14/1999 WED 20:35 FAX IZJ 005/006 Progressive Insurance Water Quality Swale High-Flow Man Made Channels -- English Units Civil Tools for Windows (01-06-1999, 15:27:09) Flow Depth - 0.380 ft Flowrate = 0.780 cfs Channel Bottom Width = 4 .000 ft Channel Side Slope 4.000 ft/ft Channel Slope = 0.02000 ft/ft Channel Roughness = 0.250 Wetted Area = 2.09 sf Wetted Perimeter y = 7.13 ft 60 44f/li 5 velocity = 0.37 fps � 4S / V/7 diette4 Froude No. = 0.12 Flow = Sub-Critical /- 1() 2 QCI )A C - 61, 9 l0 �-� AZ9 D1 78 cis • .07/i4/1999 WED 20:36 FAX [ 1006/006 u�ia Or / i' 'i � _,. AAJ it. PR"Lrr PAP -C,/ per K, ,A. S Re $ M r „ i , / ,- 0 74// r /%L/o 5o�i�.�ee &lV ;11' O J cr o W s7 x l 9 z f 3 )K zz,S— 24 x ZS 4- Z-4x 06 u o Z - sx (3)z - /1.sx Zef. .s . -- / 25s�4- O / u Ore ®, 29 ZS //iT Alai 0 ra e8 cis 1 = 3. 4- re_ = s : . 0 70 9i/ foito-r- - 0111- �o,S ,T=-_7_0 46,29 i • q or i$ C-(S 0 fen, 6" pi/it / 5 A144-1 (914-Ct dcv' Si t- a,7S 11464/4,;(- . 40156 K ta56s'5F) -:-/z<4.01-. ¢ s '-' o — O Up C15 W W ^ 61 ho IZ 6y AM. ` Z — Z// t 5 .— 009010 g4g Of7c12 11:- le-m ?6,1/ :--- f).t?,1f- r 1,1 poAx> .96-/-z- zoi ,4- r /tiw $vt Rim - zr r- lff, g 5-- S'_ • ye / sty Proposal /tJctrrccWve arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. Application For: Site Development Review; Sensiti a Lands Review Progressive Insurance Site Prepared For: Progressive Insurance 7150 SW Sandburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97281 Submitted To: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 March 2, 1999 Prepared By: Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. 5200 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 580 Portland, Oregon 97201 Ph: (503) 221-1131 E N G I N E E R S • PL A NN ER S A. SUMMARY Applicant: Progressive Insurance 7150 SW Sandburg Road Tigard, Oregon 97281 Applicant's Representative: Gary Alfson, P.E. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. 5200 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 580 Portland, Oregon 97201 Ph: (503) 221-1131 Property Address: 7150 SW Sandburg Road Legal Description: Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC Site Size: 3.39 Acres Zoning Designation: Light Industrial (l-L) Comprehensive Plan Designation: Light Industrial (I-L) Proposal Description: Construct an additional parking area and maintenance shop building to serve the existing development. Necessary Applications: Site Development Review; Sensitive Lands Review B. APPLICANTS REQUEST Progressive Insurance is requesting permission to build a 44 space parking lot, 20 foot by 25 foot maintenance building, and associated storm water quality facility to treat runoff from the newly created impervious surface. C. APPLICABLE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE APPROVAL CRITERIA The request requires Site Development Review approval as well as Sensitive Lands Review associated with localized areas of steep slope. Applicable Development Code standards are listed as follows: • Site Development Review(18.360) • Variances and Adjustments (18.370) • Zoning District Dimensional Standards (18.530) • Special Setbacks (18.96) • Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705) • Off-street Parking and Loading (18.765) • Landscaping and Screening(18.745) • Sensitive Lands (18.775) • Tree Removal (18.790) • Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) • Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) • Neighborhood Meeting Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 1 D. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 1. Site Development Review (18.360) Response. The proposed parking lot project adds 44 spaces to the existing parking serving the applicant's business. A portion of the parking lot crosses a small area of steep slope in excess of 25 percent grade. When development is proposed on Sensitive Lands, such as steep slopes, the application is required to proceed through the Site Development Review process. 2. Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Response. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to two code requirements. The first adjustment is to allow an increase to the maximum parking requirements. The second adjustment is to waive the street tree requirement along SW 72`d Avenue. Each adjustment request is discussed below in more detail. Increase to Maximum Parking Requirements. According to Section 18.370.02005d, the director can approve off-street parking in excess of the maximum if the applicant demonstrates that all of the following criteria are met. (1) The individual characteristics of the use at that location requires more parking than is generally required for a use of this type and intensity; Progressive insurance employs 250 on-site workers and has approximately 10 visitors in the building at any one time. Dividing the total square footage of the building (36,175 square feet including new maintenance shed) by on-site workers allows for 144 gross square feet per worker, the equivalent of a 12-foot by 12-foot space. When reception/lobby, lunchroom, circulation, meeting rooms, maintenance and utility spaces are considered, the square footage of area per worker drops substantially. There are currently 6.9 employees per 1,000 square feet in this use. Employee density is fairly high at Progressive Insurance as compared to other general office uses. According to ITE's Parking Generation, typical employee densities at general office uses require between 3 to 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet in office buildings less than 50,000 square feet. However, parking requirements increase as the square footage per employee decreases. The applicant is requesting an adjustment to allow for 21 more spaces than allowed by current code. The 21 additional spaces are a 14 percent increase to the maximum number of 148 spaces. The applicant's business is unique in it's higher than average employee density/intensity than typical general office uses. (2) The need for additional parking cannot be reasonably met through provision of on- street parking or shared parking with adjacent or nearby uses;and No opportunity for shared parking is available that will alleviate the applicant's parking shortage. The parking lots of adjacent uses to the north are full or nearly full during a typical week and cannot offset the need for 44 additional spaces. (3) The site plan shall indicate how the additional parking can be redeveloped to a more intensive transit supportive use in the future. The proposed parking area could be used as a building pad in the future should use of alternative modes of transit dramatically increase and parking demand decreases. The location of the proposed parking lot is such that it could meet setback standards of the base zone if a new lot were created between the two parking lots. Parking requirements for a new building could be satisfied by either under-structure parking or shared use of the existing parking lot. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 2 H R Street trees along 72nd Avenue. According to Section 18.370.0204b, the director has the discretion to grant an adjustment to the Street Tree requirements. The applicant is proposing to not plant street trees adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue and a private driveway greater than 100 feet in length. The applicant is requesting the adjustment due steep slopes adjacent to SW 72"d and the private driveway. A drainage-way on the East Side of the private driveway also makes it difficult for street trees to be provided. Street trees along SW 72nd Avenue are limited to the flatter areas adjacent to the private driveway access. 3. Zoning District Dimensional Standards (18.530) Response. The subject parcel is zoned Light Industrial (I-L) and has no minimum lot size requirement. Average lot width is a minimum of 50 feet. No setbacks apply to the site other than a 30-foot front yard setback. Maximum site coverage is 85 percent and minimum landscaping requirements call for 15 percent of the parcel in landscaped open space. The subject parcel is well over 50 feet in width, has an established front yard setback along SW 72nd Avenue that is greater than 30 feet and is well below the 85 percent coverage maximum. Approximately 1.10 acres or 30 percent of the 3.63 acre site is in pervious open space. All of the pervious area is landscaped. 4. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705) Response. No new access to public streets is proposed with this request. Existing access points to public streets will remain in their current location and condition. There is adequate access for emergency vehicles either off SW Sandburg Road or off SW 72nd Avenue. The only improvement subject to the regulations of this section is for improved pedestrian walkways. The applicant is proposing a stairway from the proposed parking area to the existing parking area. 5. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) Response. The applicant is proposing 44 additional parking spaces to meet demand for employees, visitors, and fleet vehicle storage. There are 125 existing parking spaces, 4 of which are handicapped spaces on the north side of the building. According to Mark Roberts of the City's Planning Division, this site is in Zone B of the City's parking management area, allowing up to 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor space for office uses. The existing square footage of the Progressive Insurance Building is 35,500 square feet. An additional 675 square feet of area is added to this figure with the proposed maintenance shop. Given the total 36,175 square feet of floor space, this development is allowed up to 148 parking stalls. A total of 169 stalls are proposed (including 4 handicapped spaces), 21 more than allowed by current policy. Justification for the additional spaces is explained above. 6. Landscaping and Screening (18.745) Response. According to 18.745.050C, screening and landscaping of parking areas is required. Trees within the parking lot are to be equally distributed on the basis of one tree per 7 parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The parking area is 44 spaces, thus the applicant is required to provide 6 parking lot trees. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 3 H R The applicant has provided 6 tree planters within the proposed parking lot(See Landscape Plan Sheet 4). According to 18.745.040, street trees are required for all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway in excess of 100 feet. This project fronts on SW 72nd Avenue for a distance greater than 100 feet. The project also contains an existing driveway which in excess of 100 feet in length. The ability to plant street trees along SW 72nd and the existing driveway is restricted by steep grades (>25%) immediately adjacent to each facility. A sidewalk must be constructed immediately next to SW 72nd, which will already be difficult. The applicant is requesting an adjustment from the street tree requirements to address this grade- related limitation. Please see that section of this report for more detail. 7. Sensitive Lands (18.775) Response. A small portion of the proposed parking lot (southwest corner) is on localized areas of steep slope in excess of 25 percent grade. The applicant has retained a geotechnical engineer to review the proposed disturbance and retaining wall associated with the new parking lot entrance as it crosses the small area of steep slopes. That letter is attached to this application in Appendix A. Approval of development proposed on sensitive lands involving steep slopes requires satisfaction of the following criteria. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbance to an extent greater than required for the use. The steep slope area being disturbed by the proposal is very small and isolated to the proposed entrance area to the new parking lot. The retaining wall proposed will minimize necessary grading activity to just the extent required to support the parking lot. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life and property. Disturbed areas will be re-seeded after construction and skirted with silt fence. Hay bales or other approved erosion control devices will be places with existing ditches and around catch basins to protect against erosion and siltation. See the Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 3). The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability with proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table, high shrink swell capability, compressible/organic;and shallow depth to bedrock soils. The proposed use is a parking lot. The geotechnical engineers letter attached in Appendix A indicates the parking area is appropriately sited to ensure structural stability. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. Disturbed areas will be re-vegetated as soon as possible after construction activity has ceased. See note #6 under Erosion Control on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan. The entrance to the new parking lot also crosses the top or head of a small drainage swale that runs adjacent to the existing driveway. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 4 The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbance to an extent greater than required for the use. The proposed fill and disturbance to the drainage swale is very limited. A small retaining wall is proposed to minimize the amount of fill in the swale. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life and property. The applicant has prepared a Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 3)which addresses potential erosion and sedimentation issues. The location of silt fence, hay bales and other erosion control devises have been illustrated on this plan. These measures will prevent both on and off-site hazards related to erosion associated with construction of the proposed improvement. The water flow capacity of the drainage-way is not decreased. The capacity of the drainage-way will not be decreased. The fill is proposed at the very head of the drainage-way and will not effect any storage capacity within the drainage-way itself. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated as soon as construction is complete. Disturbed areas will be prepared for seeding and seeded with an appropriate grass seed mixture as soon as construction is complete. The drainage-way will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan. The drainage-way's ability to accommodate storm water from the site will not be impaired. Storm water from the parking area is collected and directed to a biofiltration swale prior to release to the existing storm system. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained. No permits from the Corps of Engineers or the Division of State Lands are necessary. No waters of the state are impacted by the proposed project. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within the adjacent 100 year floodplain, the City shall require dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent of the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The area shall contain portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. This project is not within or close to an area of 100-year floodplain. 8. Tree Removal (18.790) Response. The Existing Conditions plan (Sheet 1) and the Landscape/Mitigation plan (Sheet 4) show existing trees, including trees greater than or equal to 12-inches that are proposed to be retained and removed. There are 21 trees of 12-inches or greater in diameter located on the site. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 5 H ��i Eight (8) of the 21 trees greater than or equal to 12-inches in diameter must be removed to accommodate the new parking lot. Sixty-two percent of the trees greater than or equal to 12- inches in diameter have been retained, so tree mitigation of 50 percent of the trees to be removed is required. According to 18.150.070D, the number of replacement trees required is determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement tree. The total caliper of the trees removed is 114-inches. Half of 114 is 57. The applicant has proposed twenty(20) 1-inch Oregon White Oaks and twelve (12) 2-inch Red Alders for total tree replacement equaling 44 inches. Planting more trees than this is not practical given their mature size and the room available on the site. In addition to the trees, the arborist also recommended planting shrubs among the trees to improve the overall wildlife habitat value of the mitigation. The applicant is proposing to plant 45 1-gallon sized shrubs amongst the trees in groupings of three. This additional planting mitigates for the remaining 13 inches of tree mitigation as determined by 18.150.070D. A certified arborist has reviewed the proposed plans and has provided recommendations for mitigation planting, planting of parking area trees, removal of proposed trees, and protection of existing trees to be retained between the new and existing parking lots.The arborist's letter is contained in Appendix B. 9. Vision Clearance Area (18.795) Response. No new access proposed to SW 72nd Avenue. Vehicles exiting the proposed parking lot to the existing driveway to SW 72'd Avenue will have adequate visual clearance. The wall height as a driver looks to the left is 3.0 feet tall less. Tree branches to the right will be pruned below the 8-foot mark to maintain visual clearance to the right. 10. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) Street Improvements. Partial street improvements were required along SW 72nd Avenue. A 6- foot-wide sidewalk is required to be constructed along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue across both tax lots 3900 and 4100. This improvement has been shown on the site plan. Overhead Power.The existing overhead power lines along SW 72nd Avenue are required to be relocated underground or a fee-in-lieu paid. The applicant is proposing to pay the fee-in-lieu of providing the improvement across tax lot 4100 only. Sanitary Sewer. No sanitary sewer service is required for the proposed improvement. No bathroom, sink or other facilities requiring sewer are proposed in maintenance shed. Water Supply. No water service is necessary for the proposed improvement. Storm Sewer/Storm Water Quality Improvements. The storm water collection system and storm water quality swale is shown on the Site Plan (Sheet 2), Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 3), and the Landscape/Mitigation Plan (Sheet 4). It has been sized and designed to meet the City's development standards. No detention of storm water is required. 11. Special Setbacks (18.730) Response. The required setback for buildings which front on SW 72nd Avenue is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet from the centerline SW 72nd Avenue. The existing building, and the new maintenance building proposed, are separated by an adequate distance from SW 72nd Avenue according to the combined front yard setback of 30 feet and the special setback of 30 feet from centerline of SW 72nd Avenue. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 6 H R 12. Neighborhood Meeting Response. A neighborhood meeting was held on December 10, 1998. No interested neighbors, residents or business representatives attended. See Appendix C for a copy of notice letter, posting certification, and related information. E. CONCLUSION The applicant is proposing to construct a new 44-space parking lot and small maintenance building on their existing property. The proposed parking lot meets all the dimensional requirements for stalls, 2-way aisles, and parking lot landscaping. They also meet tree mitigation requirements for removed significant trees by replacing trees removed and improving existing habitat found on the site. The 44-space parking lot brings their total parking count to 169 (including 4 handicapped spaces), which is 21 more than allowed for a building of this size in the Zone B parking area for general office uses. The applicant is requesting an adjustment for the additional spaces based on their high number of employees per square footage of structure, as compared to average general office uses. The applicant is also requesting an adjustment to street tree standards based on adjacent steep grades and/or drainage facilities that will make it difficult to provide street trees. The applicant has satisfied the requirement of the Community Development Code and should be granted an approval of their requests. Progressive Insurance Site Development Review 7 RECEIVED PLANNINr' SD ki IC/—c9tiO • NOV 1 9 1998 Harper • Houf 'ighellis, Inc. CITY OF TIGARD 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 Transmittal PORTLAND, 97201 FAX 503.2211.11171 PH 503.221.1131 Job No. - AK l K — q1-4- Date - I — t —9 t To - � 0 � ��C�v � From - MIkc `>1ex...AAA►ti biv,,s I3 ► ZS -5 Lo L-1& Ii u31vd 1-1`Sc14.LI , pi2. . cr7ZZ3 Project/Subject - A-41 At,{/ '1- O fr / 4a -'^-S as requested for your information for your approval for your review return requested other Item Copies Date Description t 1 ,,761.,4,1--y €50-t,L)ALA./ /es yIca. k 4E4- S ^�' pLo N-vv vz,,u• 0 y 0?.�J LKCirS LC5Id_S J Comments - Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) , being duly sworn, depose and say that on Nove4.4.44-v. (S , 19W I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) -7 50 5 cA) LA-4-7 /2e 4-4 L„,4-, 3 06 c -+ti'J (IOO o-re Z S ioI bt a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were d posited on th dat indicated above in the United States Post Office located at deposited cioLdAt_ C nas- .5 4vt with postage prepaid thereon. X12, Signature .. the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the t-b h day of Nove-v•e,\TVr 19GIF? !•';���+ OFFICIAL SEAL NOJTEAFRFY REPY UBS ELSTON LNC•.O0R4E2G 0O7N 4 COMMISSION N g R 4.P U: C OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR OS. 1999 My Commission Expires: _pplicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) l NAiME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: t 'tssi'✓c s"A•titc exe€A-A-ses,y 1 TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOP NT: S'4c. Si5IA vrC.Jtu.J 4-ov it,,a po.r_k, h4 I v`44i.�}c�kt. 6"+" ti I Name of Applicant/Owner: rrOSrcStILc Z45ua•..we c • Address or General Location of Subject Property: '71 SO S 44/ SaKd 6 u-r5 reoa c I Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot#(s): Tax L 013 39 co £ 14160 fk.ta Z 51 o 1 b C I FROM :FIRST RMERICAN TITLE 503 790 7872 19- 11-1G 15:24 #448 P.02/02 * # 1 • * MetroScan / washington (OR) RefPar# :2S101DC 00500 Parcel :R0459435 Xfered :05/06/97 Price :0 Owner :72nd Venture Llc 5/0, /97 l L Site :13615 SW 72nd Ave Tigard 97223 aid :$360000 Imp Mai :PO Box 322 Beaverton Or 97075 L :$137,, 6 Use :2012 Com, Improved p Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 TaxeS :$1,819.19 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .60, PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT :2,580 Ac: .6 SF 0 Bedrm:3 Bth:2.00 Y13:1957 Lot Sgft:26,1.36 $ld 9 0 # 2 * Metroscan / Washington (OR) RefPar# :25101DC 03700 Parcel :R0459783 Xfered :03J24/94 Owner :United Food & Commerical Workers puce Site :7095 SW Sandburg St Tigard 97223 and :$416,920 Mail :PO Box 23555 Tigard Or 97281 Land Use :2012 Com,Improved 97-98 Imp ap :$49:$196 6,9 20 96.55 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 05 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 1.55 BldgSF: pp:1.55 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:67,518 g # 3 * MetroSCdn / Washington (OR) RefPar# :2S101DC 03800 Parcel :R0459792 Xfered :07/20/90 Owner :Mccormack William L & Darlene T Price :07/50/90 Site :13730 SW 72nd Ave Tigard 97223 Mail :7415 SW Fairway Loop Wilsonville Or 97070 Land :$421,670 Use :2312 Misc,NOn-Mfg, Improvement,Ind Zone Imp :$13,499.54 480 :$763,,480 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv :Salem Freeway Sub Legal :SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, LOT PT 4 Bld 5F Ac:1.76 Bedrm: Bth: YB:1991 Lot Sgft:76, 665 Bldg SF: 4 * MetrOSCan / Washington (OR) * RefPar# :2S101DC 03900 parcel :R0459818 Xfered :03/13/98 Owner :Progressive Casualty Price :03/13/,800 S w b,Cr Site :7150 SW Sandburg St Tigard 97223 :$495,920,8 ` Mail :6300 Wilson Mille Rd Mayfield village Oh 44143nd :$1,396,490 S(�C_ Use :2012 COm, zmproved 97-98 Taxes :$25,999.98 Census :Tract:307. 00 Block:2 Telephone:440-461-5000 Thomas Bros:655 GS Subdiv :Salem Freeway Sub Legal :SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, LOT PT gld SF: Ac:2.19 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:10, 018 Bldg SF: 5 * _ MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :10459890 RefPar# :2S101DD 00300 Owner :Hayter Family Limited Partnership Xfered :07/30/98 Site :7100 SW Sandburg St Tigard 97223 Mail. :23643 SW Stafford Hill Dr West Linn Or 97068Land :$282,710 Use :2312 Misc,Non-Mfg, Improvement,Ind Zone Imp :$384, 120 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$7,480-99 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 1.18 BldgSF: Ac:1.18 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:51,401 9 CITY OF TIGpRD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT r • „. NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APP11Cq WITH VEt��NT TEAiNS [CtTS) ITN LAND USE PROPOSALS ; • u WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE - CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G.Zeller 11905 SW Alkadi Court Clark G.Z Shore Drive Beverly Froude Craig Hopkins Jack Bielhan 11905,SW 97223 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 7430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-1068 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Bill Gross Larry Westerman 11035 Gross 135th Avenue Larry Westerman Fern Street Kathy Smith Mark F. Mahon 11645 SW Cloud Court John BSWelh Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 1 g rd SW 91st Court Tigard,SW 97 th Avenue (503) 524-6325 Tigard, 9- 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-4550 (503)639-0894 Kathie Katlio Christy Herr 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 11386 SW Ironwood Loop Linda Masters Pat Wyden Tigard,OR 97223 P 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR(503)524-5200 (503)590-1970/(503)624-8009 (503)620-7662 Tigard,OR 97223 Ed Howden Barbara Sadler Ed Ho SW Morning Hill Scott Russell 9 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road Sue Rorman Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 11250 SW 82nd Avenue • (503)524-6040 (503)684-9303 (503)543-2434 97056 Tigard, OR 97223 t Bonne&Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woole 14447 SW Twekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue ry Tigard,OR 97224 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)590-0461 (503)590-0523 (503)590-4297 Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop ; Tigard, OR 97223 (503)590-3369 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250(eel,notice of meetings Il on and use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. [ 0 ibQnllpal l y1/1,3S1 Minimal,:mst 11 M.3r•97 • • • • • • • • arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 72nd Avenue Venture LLC FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 P.O. Box 322 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review, the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP VV Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 United Food & Commercial Workers FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 P.O. Box 23555 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements— Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review, the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 William and Darlene McCormick FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 7415 SW Fairway Loop Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review,the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Hayter Family Limited Partnership FAX 503.221.1171 PR 503.221.1131 23643 SW Stafford Hill Drive West Linn, Oregon 97068 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review,the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road, Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper . Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Craig Hopkins FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard, Oregon 97233 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review, the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,RE. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 Mark F. Mahon FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, Oregon 97233 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review, the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND, OR 97201 Pat Wyden FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard, Oregon 97233 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements— Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review,the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road, Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. November 17, 1998 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Sue Rorman FAX 503.221.1171 PH 503.221.1131 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97233 Subject: Progressive Insurance Parking Lot Improvements—Neighborhood Meeting Dear Interested Party: Progressive Insurance, located at 7150 SW Sandburg Road (Lots 3900 and 4100 of Map 2S101 DC) is proposing to expand their existing business by constructing a parking lot and a 30' by 40' maintenance building. Expanding the business to include the parking lot and maintenance building requires site development review through the City of Tigard. Harper Houf Righellis, Inc. is representing the property owner through this review process. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review,the applicant/owner is required to hold a public meeting with surrounding property owners and residents within 250 feet of the site. You are invited to attend this meeting on: Thursday, December 10th, 1998 at Progressive Insurance Town Hall Room 7150 SW Sandburg Road,Tigard, Oregon 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Feel free to call me at 221-1131 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HARPER HOUF RIGHELLIS, INC Mike Pruett, AICP Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston FROM :FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 503 790 7872 1998,11-16 15:24 #448 P.02/02 # 1 * Metroscan / washington (OR)-- * Parcel :R0459435 RefPar# :20.01DC 00500 Owner :72nd Venture Llc Xfered :05/06/97 Site :13615 SW 72nd Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$360,000 Mail :PO Box 322 Beaverton Or 97075 Land :$137,610 Im :$2,000 use :2012 Com, Improved p Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 TaxeS :$1, 819.19 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES .60, PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT Ac: .60 Bedrm:3 Bth:2.00 Y13:1957 Lot Sgft:26,136 B1dgSF:2,580 # 2 * Metrascan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R0459783 RefPar# :2S101DC 03700 Owner :United Food & Commerical Workers Xfered :03/24/94 _ Site :7095 SW Sandburg St Tigard 97223 Price . Mail :PO Box 23555 Tigard Or 97281 Land :$416,920 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$496,960 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$12, 130.55 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 1.55 Ac:1.55 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sqft:67,518 B1dgSF: . # 3 * MetroSCan / washington (OR) * Parcel :R0459792 RefPar# :2S101DC 03800 Owner :Mceormack William L & Darlene T Xfered :07/20/90 Site :13730 SW 72nd Ave Tigard 97223 Price :$575,000 Mail :7415 SW Fairway Loop Wilsonville Or 97070 Land :$421,670 Use :2312 Misc,NOn-Mfg, Improvement,Ind Zone Imp :$763,480 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$13,499.54 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv :Salem Freeway Sub Legal :SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, LOT PT 4 Rc:1.76 Bedrm: Bth: YB:1991 Lot Sgft:76,665 BldgSF: # 4 * MetroSCan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R0459818 RefPar# :2S101DC 03900 owner :Progressive casualty Xfered :03/13/98 Site :7150 SW Sandburg St Tigard 97225 Price :$1, 800,000 5 c,,bje��- Mail :6300 Wilson Mills Rd Mayfield Village Oh 44143nd :$495..920 -1 Use :2012 Com, Improved Imp :$1,396,490 5(4C� Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 TaXes :$25,999.98 Telephone:440-461-5000 Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv :Salem Freeway Sub Legal :SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION, LOT PT BldgSF: Ac:2.19 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:10,018 g # 5 * - MetroScan / Washington (OR) Parcel :R0459890 RefPar# :2S1O1DD 00300 Owner :Hayter Family Limited Partnership Xfered :07/30/98 Site :7100 SW Sandberg St Tigard 97223 Price • Mail :23643 SW Stafford Hill Dr West Linn Or 97068Land :$282,710 Use :2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone Imp :$384, 120 Census :Tract:307.00 Block:2 97-98 Taxes :$7,480-99 Telephone: Thomas Bros:655 G5 Subdiv . Legal :ACRES 1.18 - Ac:1.18 Bedrm: Bth: YB: Lot Sgft:51,401 BldgSF: • IP:—a. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE • WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 51>1-c dcvc/°low--"t r-c•v - J affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) -7l5 Sw ‹So. c1 6 wvS tees. ( Y Go+s aged c 9106 .0 it t oC, and did on the Iv- 4- day of Noun t 19 q? personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Pc -kt:tS /� r °%4A'Se cud IMA,-tr application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at t b It �Yr+. - (,v C Z Cl , (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (I he presenc of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 17 day of No ( , 19Q1e �.=�• OFFICIAL SEAL erg.. 's, JEFFREY S ELSTON NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �'�i� COMMISSION NO.042074 N 'Y P BL F OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR 05, 1999 My Commission Expires: PI eve'. OS, (.4q1 'Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) +AIM OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Tveoclve.gSi vc TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 5, t` y`�S �`c� e a c 5 ✓� Yc v i,.� .Aapv vu,,J f R k tk lei-/0•41,- ,.���-�.n.r,�c �H<<a�'5 • Name of Applicant/Owner: i"a Yc SS ILA �Su-✓a-.ti�L f J I Address or General Location of Subject Property: 7(5E5_5 vl � e Le(A-se� wc„,,, • ll !Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): `t"w.K L '1-5 ,S�t on E t(I 00 0 1 /111 Utz. h:Vog ntpacyVnaster uffpostmst . - arper • Houf ighellis, Inc. 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 580 Transmittal EAX 5 3.221 117201 rex 308.221.1171 PH 509.221.1181 Job No. - Mg ! q44 Date - / 1 J I ` — g To - C 11 From i' 1t a.►'G /5 C 0-1PN 1 312 S 1-1 4., 1 Fti u 1-cv vc ca-,,d / OK. . 9 72a 3 / Project/Subject - A—_-f4 CluJ// r 07C ( c Xas requested for your information for your approval for your review return requested other Item Copies Date Description Comments - Principals Charles L.Harper,P.E. Daniel S.Houf,P.E. Anthony 0.Righellis,P.E. Associates Ron D.Peterson,P.E. Jeffrey S.Elston