The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1999-00011 SDR1999 -00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A1►,. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00011 •!!. CITY OF TIGARD SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Community Development Shaping.ri Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/3/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO: Site Development Review SDR1999-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three (3) sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS OWNER: Alex & Lotte Finke, Trustees Ryan Young, Project Manager P.O. Box 23562 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tigard, OR 97281 Tualatin, OR 97062 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial District. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial District. The C-P zone district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 1 OF 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER in the Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) 1. The access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. 2. The applicant shall submit construction plans that indicate the monopole will be designed to collapse within itself. 3. Provide a Landscaping Plan showing a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15- feet in height at the time of planting between the proposed monopole tower and the residentially zoned property, prepared by a certified arborist. Include information on the size of the screening around the enclosed area within 3 years of planting, that will meet the six-foot height and 95% opacity standards. 4. The Landscape Plan shall show there will be a 30-foot visual clearance area on both sides of the access drive provided. 5. A street opening permit must be obtained prior to any site work. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 6. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained, pursuant to the approved revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History. The site is currently undeveloped. A pre-application conference was held on February 9, 1999 to construct a 3-story 50,109 square foot office building. To date, no other land use applications have been filed with the City for this site. Vicinity Information: The property abuts the easterly property line of the GM Training Center located on SW Pacific Highway and is across SW Pfaffle Street from a residential zone on the subject property's own northern roperty line. Properties to the east and west are zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently undeveloped. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1 ,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot-high chain link fence topped with three (3) strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. The site would obtain access via an existing accessway from SW Pfaffle Street. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.360.090(A)(1) Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 2 OF 9 The proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan's Professional Commercial designation for the subject property because it complies with the applicable provisions of the Community Development Code, which implement the plan. Compliance with the majority of specific regulations and standards will be addressed further within this decision. Section 18.360.090(A) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses), 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.360.090.11 (Public Transit), 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the disabled) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage. The applicant has not proposed to remove any existing trees to construct this facility. The topography and natural drainage is not proposed to be altered in any way other then the pad for the monopole accessory units. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Buffering, creening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.4 (A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened on the north and the east side with 10, 5-gallon Lugstrum Lucidum. This will screen the facility from the residential zone located to the north of the property. The south and west sides of the lease area will be screened with natural vegetation. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Section 18.360.090.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure has a natural vegetation buffer surrounding the south and west side from adjoining properties. In addition, the subject site will be screened on the north and east side with 10, 5-gallon Lugstrum Lucidum. Therefore, this standard has been met. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090(A).12 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of existing and proposed shrubs to screen the lease area. However, additional more strict landscaping standards are discussed further in this decision. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.360.090(A).15 states that all of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments. Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this decision. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 3 OF 9 dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The site will only have a 30-foot frontage onto SW Pfaffle Street. Therefore, the only impact of the site will be the vehicle access to service the site. This type of impact does not warrant improvements along the entire frontage. Public improvements will be addressed at time of full development of the parcel. • Dimensional Requirements: The C-P Zoning District standards are contained in Table 18.520.2. STANDARD C-P Existing Proposed Parcel Monopole Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq. ft 45,302 sq. ft 1,600 sq. ft - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 235 ft 40 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft 0 ft ' ; • - Side facing street on corner & - - - through lots [1] - Side yard 0/20 ft [3] - 2 ft - Side or rear yard abutting more - - - restrictive zoning district - Rear yard 0/20 ft [3] - 2 ft - Distance between front of garage & - - - property line abutting a public or private street. Maximum height 45 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% >85 Minimum Landscape Requirement 15 % < 15 % The table above compares the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the C-P zone. The entire area proposed for this use is 1,600 square feet. Therefore this criterion has been satisfied. Setbacks: Table 18.520.2 states that there is no front, side, or rear yard except 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. This standard is not applicable because the site does not adjoin a residential zoning district. The monopole is 174-feet from the nearest residential zone. FINDING: According to the analysis above, the Commercial zoning standards have been met. Access: Table 18.705.3 states that commercial and industrial uses which have 0-99 parking spaces will have a minimum of one driveway that is 30 feet wide with a minimum of 24 feet of pavement. The proposed site plan shows a gravel access easement back to the proposed utility lease area. The access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 4 OF 9 Landscaping Plan: Chapter 18.745 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of proposed and existing shrubs screening the proposed lease area. However, additional more strict landscaping standards are discussed further in this decision. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040 C. The proposed lease area will have thirty feet of frontage on a public or private street by means of an access drive. For this reason, the street tree planting requirement is not found to be applicable. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: According to the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070 states that the Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340. The off-street parking standards do not require off-street parking spaces for wireless communications facilities. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a ublic street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the access connects to SW Pfaffle Street. Because the lease area is accessed by a private drive from a public street, a 30-foot visual clearance area shall be maintained on both sides of the access drive. Therefore, this standard will be included in the conditions of approval. Wireless Communications Facilities: Section 18.798.050 provides the following review criteria for new communications towers within commercial zoning districts. Uses Permitted: Towers in Commercial Zones and the I-P Zone - A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I-P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed tower is 45-feet tall. The entire facility is setback 168 feet from the nearest residential zone. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Public Open Space - A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. A Type II adjustment may be obtained to reduce this setback, subject to criteria of approval contained in Section 18.370.020 C8a; This property is not designated as Public Open Space. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 5 OF 9 Collocation in Commercial and Industrial Zones - Collocation of an antenna(s) that extends more than 20 feet above an existing tower or non-tower structure or when collocating more than three providers in commercial and industrial zones; Collocation is not proposed at this time but appears feasible in the future based on the design of the proposed tower and the 25-year lease option. Sprint PCS did look into co- location with another tower further west on SW Pfaffle Street, but the location of the monopole fronts Highway 217 only. Sprint's radio-frequency engineers determined that this monopole would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99 in addition to Highway 217. The second tower that was considered for co-location is located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway. Sprint could not come to agreeable lease terms with the landowner. The landowner required a clause that called for termination of the lease as early as May 2004. Based on the analysis above, co-location is not feasible for the purpose the proposed monopole. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure; This property is not designated as residential. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. Accessory Equipment Shelter - Installation of additional accessory equipment shelters or related equipment if required existing landscaping is removed and cannot be replaced on the site to achieve the original intent, or to sufficiently screen any proposed new shelter and/or equipment if the original intent is no longer applicable Accessory equipment is proposed to be located on the concrete slab pad that the tower is located and will not alter the original intent of the site or require any required landscaping to be removed. Therefore, this standard has been met. Towers and Antennas in Public Rights-of-Way - Installation of any tower or antenna within any public right-of-way, provided that such tower or antenna shall be set back from any off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. This standard is not applicable because the proposed monopole will not be placed in the public right-of-way. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, not all of the criteria have been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. A 30-foot visual clearance area shall be maintained on both sides of the access drive. Review Criteria: Aesthetic: New towers shall have a non-reflective surface and a neutral color or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to FAA's requirements; The applicant has indicated the surface type to be a non-reflective gray finish that would blend with the surrounding background. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; and Collocation is not proposed for this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 6 OF 9 If collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. Collocation is not proposed for this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; The proposed tower is conditioned in this decision to be designed to collapse within itself. The Professional Commercial Zoning District does not have setback requirements except that a 20-foot setback is required where a commercial use adjoins a residential zoning district. Because the site does not adjoin a residential zone, no setbacks are required. Therefore this standard has been satisfied. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed tower is located as close as 2-feet to adjoining properties. The applicant has not indicated that the tower is designed to collapse within itself. Therefore, this criterion has not been met. No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. If, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by Section 18.370.020 C8b; The proposed tower would be approximately 1,134 square feet from the nearest existing wireless communications tower on the corner of SW Pfaffle Street and SW Hall Boulevard. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Tower height shall not exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The applicant has proposed a tower height of 45 feet, which is in compliance with this requirement. Therefore this standard is met. No liohting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); The applicant has not proposed any lighting on the tower and the FAA has not previously required lighting for towers of 45 feet in height. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum 6-foot fence; The applicant has proposed to enclose the lease area around the tower with a 6-foot-high chain link fence. Therefore this standard has been met. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs, which reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within 3 years of planting; The applicant has proposed that the fence enclosure will be screened with (10), 5-gallon shrubs but has not produced information on their sizes within 3 years of planting. Therefore, this standard has not been met and will be conditioned for approval. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be rescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (11) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 7 OF 9 The applicant has not provided screening required by this section or an arborist report. Therefore, this standard has not been met and will be conditioned for approval. Noise generating equipment shall be sound buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 DBA (day)/40 DBA (night) when adjacent to a noise sensitive land use and 75 DBA (day)/60 DBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The applicant has proposed to enclose the associated equipment for this tower inside two (2) accessory equipment cabinets, which are the size of two (2) small refrigerators. According to the (FCC) Federal Communications Commission regulations the facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Finding: Based on the analysis above, not all of the criteria have been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. Conditions: The applicant shall submit construction plans that indicate the monopole will be designed to collapse within itself. Provide a Landscaping Plan showing a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height at the time of planting between the proposed monopole tower and the residentially zoned property, prepared by a certified arborist. Include information on the size of the screening around the enclosed area within 3 years of planting Other Requirements: At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state, and Federal regulations, including but not limited to the Oregon Uniform Structural Code, Building Codes and FAA requirements. The applicant is required to comply with the applicable approval standards through the process of obtaining the necessary building permits. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. No other comments or objections were received. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered the following comment: E/C permit for area disturbal during construction is required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 8 OF 9 SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 24, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 11, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate - body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 10, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �dif '_,`, ? November 23, 1999 PREP 'ED : : athew Sc :egger DATE Assistant " anner November 23, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe soorff DATE Planning Manager i:\curpin\Mathew\sdr\sdr1999-00011.dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 1 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 9 OF 9 -a r r a- ,,,3.4r1!i 01.0y.)34iy).."11 , 'n \ (.4.."a I�a' 0 ;w 4:.:.‘-p, @ {. :, ,re.. 5i�.5`,, ,rx.iX` r fit? r� 1.,• `il' i�� . .. .,,)-, �� °�'t'•I ; It�6 ) V"s .. ,1' J l ; r ��-+s1 -Ft�;: rYl fi.�1 (L r) � �S � , .n ~. .... . _.. I :.l.Q, .. '!, x`r."'Ib*,% 4 t l�r,:,, %.%1 )S�,o"�..,t)t!L-yam 1 �,.'?`'r:' �I .'ir,- rr(; Gf.1 ,.Y.1,'('. 'r -.=r '• Sr.f�A •-'✓.;. >,- 4tii;s. --Tt''1....•�1. .-•:• lei . ) M —„',s4,,...Pi, 1.. s_s .; s- 1 s s ($ x -s §a ,...,s ,?.,s ,7.g•, r,!r�r . r Ni r v... h. r -jig. tf a::? ,£' + tiL'M a� LIZ't \-` L Co ea _n. r \\• W 1T1 l..rur,ar. 1i`,s 1 .a \\\\ 13 A rt1 1 �1 I •� ia a d d 1 w a8 �8 �� ; 6 4i8 f. ! _ . • . I , . 1 .,:�,:r• 1 1a , a �:. ' ' • 1 1 S...;,'7' 1 CI', •L A'•'11•'111• z _. 1'11\t 1 r;•k ..1,..,I.: r z,kill"),r., 1•..1 10y CA '' •. I . .• 1 .I ` .' : L �_ a!1' •11 l( �• - •; -1 {4 ! _ ''ti l . • 4j. . . =; -- , , co) 1 Iii' .i': . 1 I<. ) 1 ,,_. , T� . ' 1 .r+ 1 ”- r. '., 1 t_"' •1. '.:Y, i/.','' '.`1 ' '�i•; �rr1 r 1 .! •1.1 1.. 1 �'..! •1. �1� r �1.:! Ir' 11' r �4:' ,)IIt .. .. I � 1 11 1 It 1 t• 1. .... r.., :(.. jii) � rt.r 12.1 f y i71.. �. 1!r'� .rl� 1� rin ca (1. 1`.... , , • t `f l I.-,I 1 1•- it .6 4 C 0 ;+Il,�r, ----. r• �) Ill, ( 14,11' �,r f .) +j1r» yj. +a . c CA —•z a••4 1 9. .,'4 11.1 A._.q +`II u'1 a Al 1•1.1...,‘24 it: 1 i 1 A„A 1i `� 1'�.4yq.i� ,11c�.y1 L 1_ 1 :• C. 1..3 1 '1.1' i ,1. 1• 1 p ..� tr 1.,r. `--.`• ...1 ' 51 • O d 1 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION s : - i T Mid Q CITY of TIGARD I • I W IU1 ■ Q OE 001AiN10 INFORMATION SYSTEM III VICINITY MAP •VE S_T I \ SDR 1999-00011 all > � SPRINT PCS - Q WIRELESS w ; MONOPOLE TOWER ce 0 z 1- = co 0) N I ' A FLE 1i ...,41 ., s _,._ , Ipri, ki,. _. I _, _ �i A -4. • , ..div 1 SUBJECT N PROPERT I Pr 1 0 100 200 300 400 Feel 1'-303 feel l ,1 r aJJ i k � gg�P City of Tigard TPInformation on this map is for general location only and RIt& should vsnhsd wth the Development Services Division. ` 13 125,O Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 <. _ httpllw..,w ci.ligard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 28, 1999; C: magic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00011 ,Z51111 CITY OF TIGARD SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CommunityDevetopment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/3/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO: Site Development Review SDR1999-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three (3) sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS OWNER: Alex & Lotte Finke, Trustees Ryan Young, Project Manager P.O. Box 23562 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tigard, OR 97281 Tualatin, OR 97062 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial District. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial District. The C-P zone district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 24, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 11, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 10, 1999. For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. z ' -__�_ p SW PFAFFLE ST. > i.,'i "__ . :fir'-_ .::,:-'-!-.7.--. E•:%,r.. • f e I L 0•I,' 1-;!-.4.111.. .•.•.•. .•.•...;4 '4'..- •••' .i.:.-:5if-i."1::•..-2- ..--:. z _ 1,if.,-,,:•_,,,..41,5.:•:•:.:•:•:•:.:•••'•'•'•••'•. ..-4_•.• 4‘.„4--, < • • • . ..,3 ,iji.2 1" —1 e ;i e 't-• .�L. . e.z.- :.•- t!c; n. o L73,.,-.1 ,ri----141113ve •.•.•.•.•.• . '..-! ;:- ". " 1.. < s.,,,L�r R� — •fir, +1:::' -�=`• -`ILLS- H•1 [. . . ....__• •r,.,,..:5;y:,, o Tr---;,..le...x-,,,,,-Itfii..";__•'•7- F. -'`-..= V-----:.. - e'--- ::.,7. ..:C. .....t...r. ..„, ,, ., ,,.„,, ...., .r.i.j,4 '7"-;..-5. ' .,!. "" •-1,.:,.0- •- kc.:.. -ai, ,4ev -F-10 .7.1='75- SITE PLAN t SWR1999-00011 EXHIBIT MAP N SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (maps s of la Nalel • F VICINITY MAP – ---, ■__ —= - == ■ SDR 1999-00011 -_ ow -•' ■ ■ _ SPRINT PCS WIRELESS r— - -- -- ■■ ■ MONOPOLE - MIN L- -- •-- TOWER Ems _—..■m,d-- - --1, ...mil _6 1 , 1 - ,I,, 1 i _ , 1 1 .. on i , 1, • 1.0 11111; imp Til , _ _ ■ , NIIIIIIP, \Eior. sus�ECr N PROPER • If 1 1 .• . N. 1 ' City of Tigard .is ow l` ‘l A , r•. a.._ 1 \ i.e..-...w+.. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE F-1—,?FLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION ,y ,�A ...... ,i2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CIumty eARD Community�Devropment ShapingA(Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE IP DATE OF NOTICE: October 8, 1999 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-0001 I FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three- sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C-P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 22. 1999. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideciger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addre ie relevant approval criteria with icient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit'Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." CITY f T13ARD 0� VICINITY MAF — ....1111111111111.111 ii ■ SDR 1999.00011 <MN SOS Wireless, Inc. NOINI..111 411= Elm Monopole Tower ME cci.dmila..,19E Elm -.1.1-1114. _0 �� .".11111 M IIII Ell LE Nig 111 41111/ • • 4. • SUBJECT PROPERT o too__ton sc wo■.w Aidoi1 t-•am r.. City of Tigard 7 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORT 1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: A In T 0 iJ47-t-c— 5Ertv Al2-614--. 7-4/ 7;14 1,447-2A.1 rin/ /rt[ Z ran_ D/51.l‘c...Y. v '► (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(s): x 3qs- SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 46" REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development �/aping A Better Community 7)) U DATE: October 8,1999 i 1--p) RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program j OCT 1 2 1999 OCT 2 1 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division By CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: `A, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1 CI (Tease provide the following information)Name of Person(sI Commenting \AJI ' I2-6I I Phone Number[sl: = _ "“s SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS a�l CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Lori Dorney,US West Communications FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 1 5 1999 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORT 1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: VN (Tease provide the forlowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: r1to I SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 1 5 1999 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR11999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the folrowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: /O I Phone Number[sl: /X SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Deveropment gulping Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 RECENED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer OCT 1 3 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide t&e foffowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: ) vi o‘c I Phone Number[sl: 1.10 I SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS dit REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TI CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant OCT 1 41999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. VVritten comments provided below: (P(ease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: is I Z VAccip.a. Phone Number[sl: U- AA0c SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 TO: Brian Rager,Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: (7 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: '► (PCease provide the foltowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: p 1 Phone Number(s): �J-- SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS N o ,•-,? r N .,::2. a r is �o '0�yy •l qr.G�1y ,:-a�). 1.•, i...4 .::I ,t, .1.t1 -., 9 .,:i4.' rns �,.o•�'C' L-.s ti'IA r`. .t-.,,, J ;.t• ,d' .°•i� �. .t't• ''1'�(:..,itN'•'�x1'�"��i� ••�- ..1y,' ` 1 t 1'.1,, .E:t;'t�..0%.Ir",I,`tt.•,1, .S'Mb t,-�I,i1 `f.t'��. )i-5 , 'r '�Ci 01..2)t -.' ''''..2 � .q nt 'r ,a ,'4' � —S •" 5 aSTri:A,•SltSlx S '+wS..i S,-a-.S - 'c \m ,. , .,•-,a.",4 d ,,\ �k:� is l,.. tit.:`: t a 4 x corrl 44--,-,, .%.3 Cr.', i I L-_-. _N-,\-I\:.•--•'''',...,,,......,, . . . . . . . D = \, 1 i 4 -1 n "t_ r �+'ri b Y 2.i a �: �t ,... co• A 't r y:i 1•• 1 +;i.• r Z —* .y . ar.. 1 e' !.. ..111-L it `4..:-' it,?:-r•- :�'� ' 'I „ , , . t. V t. G Ca , 1'• t'1_�'i J,., -) t'. 1( -; ),.t••••,-.:I ',I �.; 1'' �., 'I .:'I it 1 . .. •- (... . ,'.1.r T Cis/ l(. 1. 1. !..,. t 1 .1 1..., )VV., 1 ..: i,C) i. ' :�.‘1111 (,r' .f, i. ,,i.1 1,,',fa .}�. �' ,�r :'t.t ,.t 11 T O _., '' I .•Ii, C - q.-1 CI :C1-.c -tt%-1 , :i.t ,,>.1 r t ,g- y ..:t •I 4..1 . ,)'( ,j` 1t1 • ,1 11' (CI j +.)' ji't •ty ,J` 10 I 3 ■ ® 1 'q ''':t�. ',1,,1`• ,. 1. >. 3t? (`n \ 1t(, ,t•- 1t 1 i..' t ', O ,i`' r' (' t j,) PrI �� 4•J ..• ml .1 i O 1 . CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION g. i MA' 111 CITY of TIGARD -D � GEOGRA•NIC INFORMATION SYSTEM In NI ______..._.______._____________. Z VICINITY MAP II , 1 .11li .. VE all �111111111111111 SDR 1999-0001 11111 MU MIMI ...L.0 a - -- � SDS Wireless, Inc. � Monopole Tower C) I-III — IF I-I ice co. 04,z 0:, NI _______,.... -' ^ - N .• :-.LE =_r , , • , T --. .. .. . --- 1". ____.- IF 1 _ kik / Ilki • I 5 SUBJECT N PROPERT i 0 100 200 300 400 FN: I 1'=303 feet - . Al 1 S' City of Tigard 7 Information on this map is for general location only and 12 should be verified the the D Services Division. y 13125 SW Hall Development n Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 . http:/tw w.ei.ligard.or.us Contmunity Development Plot date:Jul 28, 1999; C:\magic`MAGIC03.APR • Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ;\\ %Hr::.. July 8, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Development Review application for Sprint PCS Dear Mr. Roberts: On behalf of Sprint PCS. we are submitting the following materials for a Site Development Review application. Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot high monopole tower at 8060 SW Pfaff le Street in the City of Tigard to provide wireless communication service. Please find attached the supporting information for a Site Design Review application: A. Completed Site Development Review Type II Application form. B. Supporting Site Development Review Application materials(three copies) Attachment 1: Project Description and Site Development Review Criteria Attachment 3: RF letter re: co-location Attachment 4: WPCS lease language Attachment 5: Neighborhood Meeting materials C. Construction Drawings(three sets) D. Filing Fee: A check for$800.00 is attached for a Site Design Review Application. Thank you for your time in reviewing our application for a Site Design Review Application. Please contact me at(503) 612- 1041 should you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, 401 John . Brosy, •. Pro."-ct Manager • -f CP1: r\ 6(22 ceom ' ? ‘CO J J.6- t s??-4 Ali 6 S SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW " ' TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HaII Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: n2 DATE OF PRE-APP.: tk12 7-1-1cj Property Address/Location(s): 8060 _SW Ark-r-r/e FOR STAFF USE ONLY T/fry 02 q( 7a4;3 Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): IS/ 3 6 C D - DD 600 Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Site Size: Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: Address: P .O. Box 23562 Phone: 244-5824 City: Tigard, Ore . Zip: 97281 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: FY4-1( w 6 fa S /i/T PCS Address: 17 70 SGO /Uctiiw1( 3vr 'aN6A Comp Plan/Zone Designation: hone:(�� 6/Z-/�/) City: 704LP--t rr�l 012_ Zip: R 706). CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.aoc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ! ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY i ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): c��v �_ �� ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate , ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100.000-$999.999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sprint PCS is in the process of improving its Personal Communications System (PCS) network in the Portland Metropolitan region. To provide improved wireless communication service to the area along Highway 99 and Highway 217, Sprint proposes to include a new site located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Commercial Professional (CP) and has a Commercial comprehensive plan designation. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. At the base of the tower, Sprint would place a concrete pad for its ground equipment. On the concrete pad would stand Sprint's accessory equipment cabinets, which are the size of two small refrigerators. Sprint's Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna would also be located on the equipment pad. The GPS antenna would be operational, and approximately 4"high x 8" long x 4"wide. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Sprint's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. A Sprint technician for routine maintenance requires approximately one visit per month once the site is constructed. SPRINT PCS TECHNOLOGY Sprint PCS is the largest PCS provider in the United States. Similar to cellular technology, Sprint PCS systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station are located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of a refrigerator. The proposed Sprint base station at this site would include two radio cabinets and one power cabinet located on a concrete pad. The concrete pad would provide for future radio cabinets as capacity demands. PURPOSE AND NEED Sprint PCS is in the process of expanding its wireless communications network to areas outside of the Portland Metropolitan region, and is also improving its service to areas within the metropolitan areas to comply with its FCC license requirements. The need for improved service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Sprint's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area("search ring") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objective. The purpose of the proposed site is to provide improved service to this portion of Highway 99 and Highway 217 in the City of Tigard. It is crucial for Sprint PCS to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.090 Approval Criteria The proposed use would be located at the southwest corner of the property, and set back from the nearest public road, SW Pfaff le Street (see construction drawings — Al Site Plan). The location would preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Sprint's proposed landscaping plan would provide a natural buffering and screening around the proposed lease area. The screening around the entire lease area would result in a more compatible appearance with the surrounding land uses (see construction drawings —A2 Equipment Area Plan). A six-foot high chain link fence would surround Sprint's entire lease area for security purposes. The site is unmanned, and would be accessible to a Sprint technician for maintenance purposes only. A Sprint technician would visit the site approximately once per month for maintenance. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT (18.520) The proposed use would be located within the Commercial Professional (C-P) zoning district. The C-P district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. The provision of a wireless communications facility in the C-P zone would support business and professional services in the coverage area, and would also provide a service to the neighboring residential areas as well. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Review Criteria (18.798.050 B) The proposed Sprint monopole would maintain a non-reflective gray finish that would blend with the surrounding background. There are no setbacks for a tower in the C-P zone; however, the proposed tower would be located to the rear of the property, setback from SW Pfaffle Street (see construction drawings — Al Site Plan). Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot monopole, which meets the height requirement of 100-feet for a single user(18.798.050 B 4). Sprint's entire lease area, which includes the monopole and the equipment cabinets, would be completely surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence for security purposes. In compliance to section 18.798.050 B 7, Sprint will provide landscaping around the fenced lease area, consisting of evergreen shrubs. The proposed landscaping would add to the natural screening of the site, and none of the existing trees will be removed (see construction drawings—L1 Landscaping Plan). Tower Separation and Co-location The proposed use would not be located within 500 feet of an existing tower in the area. The co-location protocol was completed per section 18.798.080 prior to the pre- application conference meeting with City of Tigard staff on 4/22/99. Two sites were identified as potential co-location candidates in the area. Sprint initially identified a monopole tower located further west on SW Pfaff le Street, which is owned and operated by AT&T. Unfortunately, the AT&T monopole fronts Highway 217 only. Sprint's radio-frequency engineers determined that this monopole would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99 in addition to Highway 217 (see Attachment 3 - RF letter). The other tower that was identified for co-location is the WPCS ("VoiceStream") monopole at 11744 Highway 99W. Sprint could not come to agreeable lease terms with the landowner. The current landowner and WPCS have an executed lease that was signed on May 10, 1996. The lease contains a clause that allows the landowner to terminate his contract, and require WPCS to take down the existing monopole as early as May 2004 at the owner's request (see Attachment 4 - WPCS lease language). The current owner did confirm with Sprint that he is interested in selling his property soon. If Sprint were to co-locate onto the WPCS monopole, the landowner requested that Sprint abide by the same termination clause in the lease. If the tower were to be taken down at the landowner's request, Sprint would have to look for a new tower as early as 2004. Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at the Richard M. Brown Auditorium in the City of Tigard. A list with the attendees and a copy of the Minutes from the meeting are attached. --„,, Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ;MI) is April 21, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Co-location evaluation Dear Mr. Roberts: Sprint PCS is proposing to construct a 45' monopole tower for the purpose of wireless communications. The proposed site is located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, and has a Commercial Professional (CP) zoning designation. The existing AT&T monopole to the west of the proposed site was identified for the purpose of co-location. However, the AT&T monopole faces the Highway 217 corridor. Co-location onto the monopole would not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, which are to provide service to 99W from the 1-5 intersection to Main Street. Because co-location onto this tower does not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street. It is crucial for Sprint to provide the adequate coverage in this part of the City of Tigard in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. Sincerely, Steve Kartz Senior RF Engineer for Sprint PCS I j -� �► '111t. • *kr PCS• 1 -.Agabb■■■• . (1 4683 CHABOT DRIVE. SUITE 100 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 'i Y• PROJECT INFORMATION: i CASH/VACANT LAND -.....•■•vpr IVIIP (.12) ji PO29X000o-C { 11481 SW HALL BLVD. i TIGARD. OR 97223 WASHINGTON COUNTY i i1ss I I C URRENT ISSUE DATE:Sprnt PCS SM I 7/1/99 CASH/VACANT LAND U ED FOR: I ZO NIN G !I LREV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: 8Y:I- P029xcoo6-c� : 1 I, 11481 Sw HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 ■i ISSUED FOR 7/1/99 ZONING (1007.) M ISSUED FOR I I �• .5/1 1/99 ZONING 00 LPLANS PREPARED BY: ' THE PROJECT COrNSSTS OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ALL WORK AND MATERIA1s SHAD BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLFA w I SHEET OCSCIBP.,ON REV. I Q=LTA GROUPS ACCORDANCE PLAN WITH THE CURRENT GONER/444G E NG A or THE FOLNOwwc CODED II NC;jt�E#R.ING, INC. • ANTENNAS ANp ONSISTS OF EOUWMENT CABINETS FOR SPRINT AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVER/444G AUTHORHIES. NOTHING IN T1 TITLE SHEET SPECTRUM'S PERSONAL COaRN1NKJLTION SERVICES(PCS) WIRELESS THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUE( TO PER P WORK NOT 2 TELECOWIIBCAT) 5 NETWORK. A TOTAL OF NINE ANTENNAS CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. COyt`vE111.1G fliGINFIRS MGRITEp ON A situ_MONQPQL[Alb NNE EOUIPHE CABINETS LS1 SURVEY SHEET • ARE PROPOSED AT THIS SITE. BOTH THE MONOPOLE AND THE I.INFORM DULLING COOS 1994 4.N41/EM-222-F UR SAFETY ' EOUPMENT WLL BE INSTALLED AT GRADE ADJACENT TO AN 2.BANK OTTICULS MD CS10E CODE,IPA-101-19 O Al SITE PLAN { EXISTING BUILDING. AIXINSTINTOOS(BOG) 1993 c UBDRY RAi9NC COPE 1994 2 3990 S TON.CA DIM.SUITE .IY ?MOAN ICDW9fAt CODE 1994 I MU%IIIL(ECTI9C CODE 19% PLEASIANTON.CA 94568 6 D1*//D wow ORp99NC[S A2 EOMPMOIT AREA PLATT.KEY PLAN,EOUPMEHT LAYOUT&WEWAK LAYOUT 2 Lm 925-a68-OFFS iAX 925-466-0355 S o c' enl A3 ELEVAnONS. EOEAPMNT ELEVATIONS 2 CONSULTANT: 1 �� I I AI PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE Sr.PFAFFI-E ST 1 I 1 N' 6,,T �-- ) i 9, ;RTE- APPLICANTILESSEE ARCHITECT: '2T 7 �� DELTA GROUPS ENGINEERING I ; 00..C.''' �' TIGARD °"°°ou.T ERIOGf)E� r,9 1 YREIQ1TA1gN ENGINEER: TOIL HOSMER w C PNO E 925-466-7856 CONTACT: PATRICK PONC ` (925) 466-D.IS FAX (925) a6B-0355 DRAWN BY: GHK.:-APV.: I PROPERTY INFORMATION MRT �� STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: 09MER: JERRY CASH (RE AGENT FOR OWNER) DELTA CROUPS ENGINEERING _-- I rUCENSURE: s ADORE,SS 12525 SW MAIN STREET 5990 STONERIDGE DR. 1119 TIGARD,OR 97212 PLE SANTON. CA 94588 CONTACT: JERRY CASH CONTACT: ALBERT TENG _ PHONE, 503-639-4137 PHONE: (925) 468-0115 FAN. (925) 468-0355 '7� ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: VICINITY MAP �I, DELTA GROUPS ENGINEERING ISSUED FOR AREA OF CONSTRUCigN: 1.600 S0. FT 5990 5TONEIOOCE DR /,19 ZONING (I �"t »�» B PL ASAN . CA 9s588 SHEET INDEX CONTACT: RAYMOND CH:u DATE: 7/1/99 PHONE: (925) 468-01,. FAX: (925) 466-0355 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: v CURRENT 20N94. CONACRCIAL SURVEYOR: I _SHEET TITLE: TAKE 217 TO 99W.TURN LErt TOWARDS BFAVERTON. UNCOINTYLY GO RIp1T AT SOLING APPLICATION H TBD Gkl LAND SURVEYRIG DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS I UCHT ONTO 11111.BLVD. GO NORTH.OVER THE OVERPASS:THE FIRST RIGHT TURN 9116 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE AWNLABLL IS PFNT E. TURN ONTO PFNTLE,CONTRIVE EAST UNTIL YOU CONE AP.N.: IS 136 CD 00600 BEAVERTON.OR 97006 TO Sw BIST AVET IE. THE VACANT LOT ON THE RIGHT IS THE SITE. CONTACT: MICHAEL 0. RENNICK I TITLE SHEET HANDICAP REOUNEMENTS. FACILITY IS UNMNR4ED AND NOT FOR PHONE, 503-641-0306 FAX. 503-671-0677 CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING pNENS10NS ARO 1RIMAN HABITATION HANDICAPPED CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT I ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR i BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. SHEET NUMBER: REVISION: DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES 2 99B288 I III ,-----..-.-.-.---.17"---ip —1111,-- six.i n t ET.ST,NC (.y Mf POWER POLE SprilI. L<— -e± I ..*,5;q°29'57"E 235.88' 4603 CHABDT DRNE. SUITE 100 n a-- - �' 0 / PLEASANTON. CA 94588 4 UV� p rpROJECT INFORMATION: ://'. O H �EX!$71NG PROPERTY LINE `ik d CASH/VACANT LAND a. _ P029XC006—C ' HT.45' 8 TREE ROw QI w1 4 30'kUNDER ~' / W�� t` 1 1481 SW HALL BLVD. (� f _ PROPOSED 6'HER,CNUN TIGARD, OR 97223 wt ? A : NT-S6' LAN.FENCE roar WASHINGTON COUNTY I `� V 40.00' r36'n- ITURRENT ISSUE DATE: % :),...:..;.- , , u ii 0 0 TREC RO. Oe I t`� • HT-3D'NwOER N .-ISSUED FOR: / �� N ZONING 1,,`/�O 4... $ REV.:=DATE:=DESCR,PT ION: BY tis' ! 0� "'-'e PROPOSED 45 HIGH PROPOSED 40•X40' LEASE AREA Z.sS A . %*i$ MOOOLE k •• THRC ZO 6OAWiNDER H1-26' OEn ` V. TIP �� TREE ROW 1 - I - .. EXISTING PROPERTY UNE w. O Q -7G'NUMDER LK�51NG CRAM LINK FENCE ♦ i� :..00' - 2.00' EXISTING P WENT --- -- +_ A ;y�l ,re N .y. 1� 21.00' - x _ � )( fillniiirk., ;;'0%-∎-'.::-- -. 8�—.- '186.32'■ T•45`'��a O O OO;�: 9,v�:OTOwenOO { i ►� HT.i9. - - .RISVNC DIRT R. ♦d! N-21s' Q NT.19' t TREE ROW 0 ~ ♦ LPLANS PREPARED BY: HT-20'kUTRW EXISTING B ILOI7JC ♦ i HTRIV ;9. H T-19' I G&L LAND SURVEYING,INC. I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVITORS �1) ♦ 9116 SM.NORM AVE To. 0 % BEAVERTON.OR97009 •� HT.4O \ EXISTING BUILDING P ♦ TEL 503-841-4108 FAX 503-871-0477 C\ . 1 4, ♦ r�CONSULTANT: I ■ ♦ OVERALL SITE PLAN 1 i 2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN j 'G'E+ 5: 1 1 I I'.19. DATE: 4/26/99 SEE ATTACHED CXMBR A EXISTING DESCRIPTION PROPOSED 1 THIS lEGA1 DES BASED ON THE TITLE REPORT PRONDEL` RE. P0299C006-C CASH/VACANT LAND SITE NAME: CASH/VACINT LAND — 11481 SW HALL BLVD. --> — SANITARY SEWER TzARD, OR 97223 SITE NUMBER: )— _ WAS INGTON COUN+r P029zC006-C `DRAWN BY:�C HK.:— SITE ADDRESS. „441 SW HALL B:vD. )— STORM SEWER ff APV.: ■niN NI O WO 4 4.S76•HS.r IN T1GARD. OR 97223 WATER MAN BKH 1 I d�1k b0 23 0!VOW'n INX I. b 4R.K✓a W 9R W rude d 0 N I kba a NI N b OF WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY YANNOLI ELEVATTOIfS 120 bd+r+M. .NI•••loan ry.r a r ALL Yr I A NO eeeAl r STORY STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS `LICENSURE: ITU MN__ TM 1~19 INN IM.dIFIW)..°1...A IN N.A.Amon O .r 1163 OWNERS NAME: JERRY CASH (RE AGENT OF OWNER) (RD-0-eR e�a�•arm ARAN,w NeeRW Ile k AWrd NO r 4.KZdt OWNERS ADDRESS: t w HANN e,W.( GAR SW MAIN 72 STREET PROPERTY LINE k R.O.W. •y4)w r d A Rda•C411ek NUN O4Ye4•IQ7 9Xrp 8)NC nGARO.OR 97Z 12 4ll.rl b IN RsIN bet _,-* SURFACE DRAINAGE > 401f1E1® O WT STANDARD • PROFESSIONAL MKT PARCEL NUMBER(S) 151 36C0 600 LAND SURVEYOR NET AREA OF UNDERLYING PARCEL(S),S 1.04 ACRES 0.—_. STREET LIB S P2-TS SPOT ELEVATOR .1,./-r'' NET AREA OF PROJECT AREA 1.600 SOUAAf FEET 1-0)2.._../ CONTOUR ("-'6)1J I OREGON BRUT, F HEN$ON P'S GROUND ELEVATION 235 FEET -6 0 GAS MAIN C MAN K HENSON PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION j LATITUDE&LONGITUDE BENCHMARK- WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCHMARK O' M...ou j Lw 6-36-66 u p ND. 401 ELEVATION 229.69 FEET 0 CATCHDAS. O °24 R A i a s BASK OF ELEVATIONS: NGW 29 0 INLET i N 'k^ 0 N N BASE Jr BEARRDS: MONUMENT$ FOUND AND HELD PER ® VALVE w FOX EET TITLE' SURVEY N0. 25.446 WASHINGTON 1--0 FTRE HYDRANT /-� �� SW KAiTLE S' r� COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS TOGETHER ITE PROJECT. UTRJTY NC POWER EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE ND EASEMENT LINE SITE SURVEY k 1 LATITUDE O+OTUDE AND GROUND ELEVATIW TAKEN A, FENCE GENERAL INFORMATION SOOTHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND ECRES:.AS SAD y CENTER OF SITE 4y�� sat ,.,r' 2. CONTOURS Ara A' ONE (1) FOOT INTERVALS -1X--If I- BURIED L7TIlJf1'LINE JE U' EASEMENT(S)FROM_______ TIN THE PROJECT AREA 0 UTILTI!POLE ■ =17 �4 TIGARD OE OS OHt#HEJ10 UTILITY UNE OC 01 NOTE TIC LOCATION OF EXISTING UTS.ITY FAU7UTCS HAS NOT BEEN . r - !mowO SHEET NUMBER: REVISION: e RESEARCHED. TIC CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE RESPECTIVE IRLLJTT CCAPANIES CO CBTNN INFORMATION REGARDING EXAC'DEPTH OF BITRLAL ¢ - ' AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 15 1 THE SURVEI'OR ASSUMES TA RESPOINSIBIUTY FOR THE OELDNEATION OF ' SLACH UICERGGROIRND UTSJTCS. NOR FOR M EXeSTEINCE pF BIOKO Lsi OBJECTS WHICH ARC NOT SHOWN ON 7185 PLAN I• PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF EASEYENT(S) VICINITY YAP t SI T E DATA LEGEND 2004-II - -- --- ■�■ . ..''' ''... *Int. - - • *W M" OWING PIEUC ROAD 4683 CHABOT DRIVE. SUITE 100 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 E'er 'UT�T FOIE MISTING CRAVEI ACCESS _PROJECT INFORMATION- _— —— _�— fASEMENT —_—------✓._ ,I � . c 4 5 ' '0. GS�H/�AV�A�AyC��NAP�Tt�LAND _,'.. �... - 1 PROPERTY LITE SlrbSTE .. .._.. _ O 'OL7XCOOPC 114B1 SW HALL BLVD. -------- 1 TICARD, OR 97223 —t v WASHINGTON COUNTY �� - 4 Mims aIEE ED MINN I —CURRENT ISSUE DATE: '''.\ _ I 7/1/99 = j I ISSUED FOR: PROPOSED 5'-0' rnDE ��'' •Td ---1�_ + t ZONING I IPOERGROUND POwERTTD_CO _ - '--- , ROUTING EASEMENT .-.1. t`,� - I EV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY EXISTING PAVED ROAD ' -- - _ --_ I c 1PAIPA'.EXTEND TO --` ,,;T i THE YAPJ ROw \l •1 - �` .-- \1{ - --- Tit I - sy� w - ISSUED FOR mum g; i I 2 7/1/99 ZONING (100%) MT -- •`:* 1 ISSUED FOR ry�,, y,', "iT � I A 5/1 1/99 ZONING DO ' ; PLANS PREPARED BY: '� I. r F" ,2_p WIDE ACCESS _ I r DELTA GROUPS l ' .. � h I li �ENGINEFRINGA INC.. MINIM 1 ✓' _ �1 / / \ t , ` ' 1 5 CAI. GLOSSY PRIVET j:y/ ^, .j - •--------- I 5990 saERIDGE DRIVE.SORE ,t9 • 1r1} I PL6ASANTDN.CA SAW / ,� ` 16'1 TEL 925-455-0115 FAX 925-A08-0355 /✓ 1 - _\ -PROPOSED 407x40'LEASE-AREA I :'4i y I� — aoUND*Y _- =CONSULTANT: ■ I •_ __.. - ,T PROPOSED 8'-C NKH C1wN y - UNK FENCE •- '2-'1 t ,f -• I - PROPOSED SPRINT PC - I - EQUIPMENT aBNETS _ -" `,-.4.-.. - ,'. I} g PM FOR SPRINT PCS COMMENT '• •, .- -[-I I i•-; 1, PROI=AS•-d NON MONOPOLE I DRAWN BY: CHK.:=APV.: ----+ - ( MAT I '�: '� F J 1h j� yI ___ — -- I =LICENSURE: 't-- •I1L -----'--- 8 - .'PgPER1Y UNE MMM'3Tw ,.. - ,- ty- -ss�s.e�sa��_—--�'�� tit--'--..- - ---- --- _ _ •- 1 Li1 illS'EXTSTRNG DIRT Row Y. _ =SHEET TITLE: .. RsaMANG / w.. SITE PLAN 7 .. 162J' NOTE: THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON THE SURVEY. OTHER THAN THE - T'A'T' =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:— - LEASE AREA ITSELF. ALL DIMENSIONS, CONTOURS. ETC. ON THIS - DRAWING ARE SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION BY THE SURVEYOR. - - SR'E PLAN i a RI .1. 1 991231 P-I• PROPOSED PD11ER/rEU:D - _ _ - PROPOSED 12•-1r WAX ACCESS I UNDERGROUND ROUTING = _ _ - EASEMENT•SEE 1/A1 FOR CONTINUATION G `. e PROPOSED mew Pcs tai�v WIDE ACCESS T, yy 1 I 1 �(�� >> T ( IF_ �r t AMMAN(3 PER sEGrdF. EASEMENT A _ �i' ti _;? a•" ll 2 INTR. t FUTURE •3 SECTORS tOtwU 1�9 �. hIfl' •r Ton"am i11 tl',j''•I J" y� 'L..Yl {{{. F . ia; �wklCS „' ; L'.;9 .4. ..,- '. ,. J� y�,• ?r .,-,' W,•, �,/n ;,.- +-r-MJC-. ,D i LIGUS I -� PROPOSED(2)9'-V x9'-G - J TI I..' .� .�: TC ,L'Y 1.} �. i` '1• T." NNW LUC DtN 10•-tr - CHAIN N uNK ACCESS GTE _ /E ,- •, �'-;.tii.•S' -i i 'f� i , 5 GAL I GLOSSY PRNET 4683 CHABOT DRFVE• SUITE t OD t I c, �l t.!f= 1f I.1jF '1� :=_____-1/ ',yam_ PLEASaNTON. CA INFORMATION: + `\ 1,� /, z .��y - —1% =.x'. _1'X I 1 �+ C _ I I�.' INFORMATION% -,' 2J'-0 LE_ i'1- CASHNACANT LAND /E a . s:. rOZ9XCA 8L %rill.'..u'• / PROPOSED as'-7 1RdN • ~ % T ,'.I1 --'`.. - PROP�DSED TAPC GIBNET 1 11481 SW wALL BLVD.i ii,,,, ASHIN, OR 97223 wowomis ( � /\. PROPOSED�D, I- y-2 4s, zy` I zN0 �� s° g(-p� atE7ER % E �,`r- WASHINGTON COUNTY rROPDyEp E,OKEMf1 �� _-__� __-L. .._ y'/�^ [CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 1.-: GENERATOR LRGEAQF tT _ -,T--, C 1 JR'�' 7/1/99 'T OMB PROPOSED(PS ANtENNU, L X -,`N .'1 1 M1N F, PROPOSED$A Ni P[5 EOUIPNENt CJ+&NETS b I 41; r ISSUED FOR: ■ I I \'1 /• FOR so UGHT ma LIG ADMIRE I x I ,;KL �I ZONING■ -REV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY �\��J ■ ,R N�II 1 R P�A t t b ` 0_ -4...4.. •... I - - = PROPOSED C°NCRnE P A C ANTENNA I A OU "A N pRA� NMI ® 4 t C x 1-i__-� �.''14/— _ ,.)A'•d�:- PCS EWIPNENr 3f j:ac ..,. PROPOSED 6'-CT HIGH CHAR+ I ;�e // LINK FENCE n ��I /�. I I - PROPOSED 45'-0• NIDH MONOPOLE fv. ._-_ :, X 1' q2 PROPOSED SPRINT PCS ANTENNA • y r( e (3 PER SECTOR. , INrtA , FUTURE J JI ` ,y' xr _. • 1 SECTORS TOTAL) i..-- ,'.. EXISTING pWN LIHII FENCE 2 : ;:/1/ ZONING (000x) MT /� ISSUED FOR I I — _ �� /T\ 9 ZONING DD . - X � - % � _ ` ff C-' / I .PLANS PREPARED BY: A g DELTA GROUPS I _ _ ENGINEERING.INC.. V �% X X —_ % % % __ R _� GU4E CONSULTING INfsINELI. W C V ___ ^ _- __. _ __ 5990 STONER=ORNE.SLATE n9 _fr i — ____ - I2' - -- Ip-3* -- 1 -- – �N'_C— --12• -- - -' --- - o t'36'n' ---- - -- PLFi15ANTp1.G 94599 I a _ g • - -- TEL 925-469-0115 FAX 925-0A-0555 a0'-? LEASE AREA 90UNOARr --------__. W -CONSULTANT: t• UNUSED ,N'�`: - EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN - N tttt_...I ® I 1 PROPOSED IOOA 10'-9 (OUT TO OUT or CONCRETE SLAB) NETER RASE '.1'-0• 2'-Y r' Y-r •S, 2•-Y ,t•-F/• PROPO5E0 GENERATOR ' EXEC T11L0 I •.i. I d -! r RAWN BY CHK.=APV.: RECEPTACLE JJ9 .•' - -- -- - - --- f MRT l L�.!!/ r --T- , — _LICENSURE: I PROPOSED For 1 I m I I I "-' y 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE ^� I. .I M Ai I SCAB (I+'-Ff.,O'-P) 'r-' C T •'-0 ` I I 4, .C. ' J L J 1 i -- V PROPOSED GPS — ..` ANTENNA ^ 0 ■: b `, i 11 PROPOSED LAG AR t o • •-- - Y:�`!, SEV,CE uGHTNG • - ---�Fi=__ . __=T� L , '✓ + r .... ' r 9 9 I r. J- --� _SHEET TITLE:IN I $ II II -, to b PROPOSED SM21NT ,'-1 y`_ 1" -- —i--- PCS EWIP,aEM I u II I I c�NETS ,,. •--`V;,.• I — I 0 EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN n n I = I �; E KEY PLAN ••• 9. .R• .I "�3. �' EQUIPMENT LAYOUT L---JL--�L--,•,J b '�—��=_—_—'--` ' ANTENNA LAYOUT .:. .._.......r� I - - 1 / =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:_ T•-Cf 2'-S 22' 1..� 2T 2T Tr-6N...1 ... r r t.• ' ""1 2 UNUSED - EQUIPMENT LAYOUT "AR ;` I "`ik — 3 KEY PLAN N ` 1 2 ' A2 NOM ..r,© • r r tt9Fmt ,::;,,r7 991288 -.AL.Sixiiii. . Spbd Ks' U I e'^ 'ry PLE SA HABOT CA R 94SURE 100 N ,/,`,V J\& I \ 4ir� F1F' 1�/ =PROJECT INFORMATION: sECTDR , �I. A21„u h g CASH/VACANT LAND V� i 'I,i! Att�i�� SECTOR , AllS..�`` rOZ9XW06-C itb.e.7-11-,Li 1.D tt.t. ir�t' 1� ' + . v,¢`'' '�'f�i' cr i� �� '�/�` 11481 SW HALL BLVD. U ri cF t TIGARD, OR 97223 c\f i '� ` \- b- WASHINGTON COUNTY M1 J\° %` 7' =CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 7/1/99 1 =ISSUED FOR M TENNh LAYOUT ANTFN�YQT r aTTNNA LAYOUT ANTENNA LAYOUT ZONING `REV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY 1 to Or uONOPOE TOP OF ANTENNA I ANTENNA(SPRINT SECTOR. N+TE..+A GEN ERLNE b �� { PROPOSED SPRINT PCS ISSUED FOR 2 Dern.A(3 PER SECTOR, 711 • , " f ANTENNA(3 PER SECTOR. 7/1/99 ZONING ;100x) MT 2 I TEL SECTORS TOTAL) • I I U 'I I� ��I a INITIAL , FUTURE ISSUED FOR •3 SECTORS TOTAL) A 5/11/99 ZONING _OD 10 u>aDW PROPOSED PGS ANTENNA .LANS PREPARED BY. PROPOSED 45-� �" 5 GWSS PRNEr DELTA GROUPS PROPOSED UG,(T FIXTURE FOR SERVCE LOOTING PROPOSED 45'-0- ,RCN TO RER TREES '�°N°POLL ENGINEERING,INC. TO 11014ANZ\ TO RENNIN (BEYOND) PROPOSED SP: PCS L Y EOxDNENT cAmers CONSULTING MINIM y o.V.. a yP Ex6TNG TREES TO A .a. ••, t� a.4 mow.,,.+y _. K,.- ad. Y.*. v �r4.' PROPOSED 6.-0" ____— RENAN --� 5990 STONERIDGE MK.SURE 119 >~+ v w •"� ••f wE ivT taus 11/[— PLFiISNRON.G 94b0 FENCE i x L,. w #nor °T r`+4 +w c'ha'r•, 1i +.. 4a ""MA.. ^ A. .9P u"w1M v ..../411 ,. «. TEL Sri-466-0115 FAx - +a .., pw, D25-4F6-0555 s '•3r •iF+a- f 1• .,g,rir - /r *.. *''. #- _!•- R__:.N'_ ,01'!. y ..-f.S ate. .t 4. 1 .- '�` f - 99. *di, ..4-CONSULTANT:• ' •7:' . - ' ',t + , T !i- ra a' v At ,is • r ,." .' qy,, I, / ii ,-. r . ,f , ; , ,\ F1NSN ova PROPOSED(21 e'-D'xV. [DRAWN BY: CHK.:—APV.: CNAN LN ACCCESS GTE ,,MRT I I�./' WEST ELEVATION '�"` ® 7 SOUTH ELEVATION 'P'I`E ® —LICENSURE: " ' 1 law 9 a . I I . C , 5 EAST ELEVATION ® I 3 NORTH ELEVATION 1 ® 1 PROPOSED 2004 PETER BAST ANTENNA CPS / PROPOSED GP5 PROPOSED CPS ANTENNA ..`\ — NETER ASE DOA PROPOSED EMERGENCY PROPOSE[ �' / PROPOSED UGNT PROPOSED UGNT FOAURE \ �ANTENNA GENERATOR RECEPTACEL ANTENNA PROPOSED UGNT FTYTURE / NATURE FOR FOR SCRVICE UGNTING FOR SERVICE LOWING / SERVICE LIURING PROPOSED PP[ ` CABINET ,_ PROPOSED PRC CABINET ■ PROPOSED PWR _ `�\! 1 L I. '� PROPOSED FUTURE PROPOSED PPR CABINET CROWD,GENETS.1TP CABINET(BEYOND) 'Tl:( �� _ � �-- _• 1:1' L ' 0 PROPOSED Pr —I U =SHEET TITLE: • 6181`' I r ELEVATIONS I / PRO p5Q sTTn I EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS . . DRDPOSEG STEE.• 1[7� �� T coNc•Ert sue p ��- 1. ��/— sKro =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:• �I b ' i • _� CONCRETE SLAB I ( PROPOSED CONCRETE J 11 I — SLAB I WEST EQUIP. ELEV. ,M ® 18 SOUTH EQUIP. ELEV. ® I 6 EAST EQUIP. ELEV. ® J 4 NORTH EQUIP. ELEV. ® 2 I H I 99B288 or,-) 7 Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS .I::.. .l�i May 7, 1999 RE: Sprint PCS Wireless Telecommunication Site #P029XC006-C Address: 8060 SW Pfaffle, City of Tigard, Oregon Dear Interested Party: Sprint PCS proposes to construct a 45' monopole for the purpose of installing wireless telecommunication antennas. The proposed site is located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard and has a Commercial Professional (CP) zoning designation. Sprint's objective is to provide wireless telephone service, in compliance with its FCC license obligations, to 99W covering the area from the I-5 intersection to Main Street. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting: Day and Date: Tuesday, June 1, 1999 Venue: City of Tigard Meeting Room - Richard M. Brown Auditorium Address: 13125 5.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 Time: 7:00 PM Please notice: this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you more specifically. Please call me at 503-612-1012 if you have any questions. Sincerely, . R on Young Project Manager AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING State of Oregon ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Susan Brown, being duly sworn, depose and say that on May 11, 1999, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 19190 SW 90th Avenue, Tualatin, Oregon, with postage prepaid thereon. Susan Brown (in the presence of a Notary Public) Dated: Jr= Subscribed and sworn ' b fore me on the 11th day of May, 1999. Notary Public of Oregon My Ciai zi,s inn c Aires: 2- 1 0 �1 , MICHAEL OFF)C&##L S �� _ R.SEEAL *�.;o NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NY COMMISSION p�9tECOMMISSION �FOL 3,2003 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING State of Oregon ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Michael Geddes, do affirm that I represent Sprint PCS, the party initiating interest in a proposed wireless telecommunication facility on the land located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, and did on the 11th day of May, 1999, personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a land use application for same, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at the front of the property near the right-of-way where it can easily be seen b s eighbors and pa.sersby. Mic s ael Geddes (in the presence of a Notary Public) Dated: 5- i i - 9 9 Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 11th day of May, 1999. Notary Public of Oregon My Commission Expires: 2 - 3 ,24ti 6.3 •_' SUSSAN C.BROWN � f NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.320354 MY COMMISSION EXPtRES FEB.3,2003 Minutes from 6/1/99 Neighborhood Meeting Location: Richard M. Brown Auditorium (Tigard Water District) Attendees: See attached The neighborhood meeting began at approximately 7:00pm. The attached sign- up list includes those who attended the meeting and a copy of the Neighborhood meeting Agenda is included. Ryan Young introduced himself and John Brosy as representatives for Sprint PCS, and Mr. Young gave a ten-minute presentation about Sprint PCS, its technology, and the need for the proposed site. A description of the presentation's outline is as follows: Why Sprint is proposing a site? A. Coverage objective (Hwy 99 and Hwy 217 in Tigard) B. Inability to co-locate on two identified monopoles in the area. II. About Sprint PCS technology A. Largest Personal Communication System (PCS) in US. B. "Cells" or geographic coverage needs C. Infrastructure required Ill. How a site is determined A. Need for additional capacity B. Engineering identifies target area and conducts a propagation study. After Mr. Young made his presentation, the meeting was open for questions and discussion with the aid of preliminary drawings and photographs. The questions that were asked are described below in italics, followed by our response. 1. Why wouldn't Sprint locate on the smaller tower down the Road? The monopole tower down the road on Pfaffle St. fronts Highway 217 only. This tower was initially identified for co-location purposes, but Sprint's RF engineers determined that it would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99. 2. What about the other tower? The WPCS ("VoiceStream") monopole tower was also identified for co-location. Sprint pursued co-location opportunities with WPCS; however, Sprint could not agree with lease language with the landowner. The current landowner (Hans Grunbaum) and WPCS have an executed lease that contains a clause that allows the landowner to terminate his contract, requiring WPCS to take down the monopole. The monopole could be taken down as early as May 2004 at the owner's request. Mr. Grunbaum did confirm with Sprint PCS, during initial conversations, that he is interested in possibly selling his property soon. If Sprint were to co-locate, the landowner requested that Sprint abide by the same clause in the lease re: termination of the contract and taking down the tower. Accepting those terms is unacceptable to Sprint because Sprint may have to look for a new tower within four years. Sprint's lease requires a 25-year term that is renewed and terminated only by Sprint. 3. What is inside of the lease area? The entire lease area is a 40' x 40' space. Inside of the fenced lease area would be the Sprint monopole and near the base of the tower would stand Sprint's equipment cabinets. 4. Are there any concerns with waves or radiation — conflicts with other technology? No. There are no concerns with waves or radiation because the Federal Government has concluded that no evidence or studies suggest that wireless communication facilities are associated with giving radiation to people. Further, the proposed facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the FCC regulation of radio transmissions. 5. Will there only be a small building inside of the lease area? No. Sprint does not require an equipment building inside of its lease area for the radio equipment. Sprint only uses equipment cabinets that are the approximate size of two small refrigerators. 6. What kind of wall or screening would be around the facilities? Landscaping and screening will be provided around Sprint's proposed lease area. A brick wall would not be constructed to provide screening. Usually a wall is constructed around a site when there is a building next to it, and adding a wood or brick fence results in a more compatible appearance. In this case, vegetation and planting would be more appropriate to the site. 7. Will there be an easement to the site? Yes, Sprint has already worked with the landowner to receive an easement for access to the property, which is included in the lease. 8. When do you expect to build? The exact construction start has not been determined by Sprint. However, once Sprint submits an application for land use review, most likely, you could estimate construction starting during the end of 1999 or early 2000. 9. Will there still be room for leasing the rest of the property? Yes. There will still be sufficient space for the landowner to lease space for other uses or propose additional construction. 10. Does the tower itself only receive calls? The monopole tower would both transmit and receive phone calls. 11. Will we receive further notice if you proceed with the project? Yes. Once we submit an application to the city for land use review, and City of Tigard Planning staff makes a decision, all neighbors within 500' of the site will be notified of staffs decision. 12. Did you try to lease from the GM building? Yes. However, General Motors did not show any interest in leasing space for Sprint's antennas. In addition, the GM building's height would not provide the needed coverage, based on a Sprint engineer's determination. The GM building is located at a level much lower than the site where the monopole would be constructed. The residents appreciated Sprint's efforts in making time to meet with them and try to answer any of their questions/concerns. The meeting was then adjourned. ATTENDANCE ROSTER MEETING DATE: 6//I99 PLEASE PRINT! NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE PHONE # 0/101 \{o04(s it'r 7170 Sw iMahQuX Tv&LA--rcr I ,02 6/2 -to IL Z IC'*\N tI l g4OrS 1 110 SW IMO W k( 'I-UAL/N-1 114 X- Ff�nK C o�j W7 \ I D-`�"a- 3 w 8 I Ie i�j AC-d c 997 96 8-aL/ 7 CI,O,.cr7 I ) J-LI- Sti• 1 19ec T;3 Arc 0iA / 7a 7‘ 1-0-7 kkr. 14A4. .1 &At( g3 q15-1-3 Lao fr -,i1 -/tit4 1 1 a ( S „T. to . 7 4 � 1-4- rri P t AlCe, I5y:lA/ //,4f or SGcJ 324 O 9 772 - --�� Clat Lc <1.: I \ 2 g.s— ■..3 -2 ? •1-__g AQ_ (( 'I p Vamd9)conwyyls•pn_m ooc REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 TO: Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Fire Marshall FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: '•• (Please provide the follirwing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: /, ,,�� , ,.�N 1 Phone Number[sl: ?orc, I SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TY OF TI TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: October 8,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [503]639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C- P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v '► ((ease provide the forbriving information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: Phone Numbertsl: SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ' NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS C[TArea: [CI tEl [S] IN CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ®per #e a in .._;61, . Bonita] FILE NO(SJ.: c't C i X FILE NAMEESI: �,,j -_(ca CITY OFFICES • LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,supervi., _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./D mnr Svcs re nnc ans OLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,c n.Prevention O er ,/UILDING DIV./David Scott,e.odingoaicial ,ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dmpmm R.vbwEoWnon, -WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,uaaiesM.nager __CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Cal),Recorder _OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* /TALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS • _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. _METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA's2DA's) Larry French PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue Bonneville Power Administration _WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Routing TTRC—Attn:Renae Ferrera _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Trans. PO Box 3621 Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Portland,OR 97208-3621 Tom Highland,Panning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _ 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 OR,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA's) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 811 SW Sixth Avenue _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97204 _ODOT,REGION 1 • Mike Borreson(Eryineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Sonya Kazen,DNpmt Rev Coord Jim Tice(1GA's) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir 123 NW Flanders _Tom Harry(Current Pi Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Phil Healy(Curren Pr Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue _Sr.Cartographer(CPA/ZCo)tas re Portland,OR 97204 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Jim Nims czcA(Ms is Jane Estes,Perm¢Specialist _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Portland,OR 97221-2414 Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS ZTCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC /NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY /GENERAL TELEPHONE /US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO3O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 11C Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE(Apps E.elHaluraof99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * -1NOICAUS AUTOMATIC NOT1IICAVION If WITHIN COO' OF Mt SNSJECV DRO@'CRFY'FOR Ai4r/ALL CITY PROJECTS. /PROJLCT PLASM.15 1teSPONSISiL FOR IMOICATINC~nu TO NOTIFY) h:\patty\masterslrfcnotice.mst 22-Apr-99 MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CIT„AL. Y OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community ,ST 'J'L OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of 7tgard ) I, Patricia L.Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of T ard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-0001 I/SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER _ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) El City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type/Ku-la 01 NOTICE)) FOR: (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(SI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhi I I", on the 24th day of November, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 24th day of November, 1999, p•stage pre:-i.. e / _ .� e�. /lam (-- : that ;!red otice) a O r Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of ALI �. . �. 41 OFFICIAL SEAL ox / . DIANE M JELDERKS '/� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON T I r ' ' '' I I I ' N i ' �;} COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Expires( • • EXHIBIT A J NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00011 CITY OF TIGARD SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER Community Development Shaping si Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/3/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO: Site Development Review SDR1999-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three (3) sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS OWNER: Alex & Lotte Finke, Trustees Ryan Young, Project Manager P.O. Box 23562 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tigard, OR 97281 Tualatin, OR 97062 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial District. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial District. The C-P zone district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1 S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 1 OF 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be MATHEW SCHEIDEGGER in the Planning Division (503) 639-4171.) 1 . The access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. 2. The applicant shall submit construction plans that indicate the monopole will be designed to collapse within itself. 3. Provide a Landscaping Plan showing a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15- feet in height at the time of planting between the proposed monopole tower and the residentially zoned property, prepared by a certified arborist. Include information on the size of the screening around the enclosed area within 3 years of planting, that will meet the six-foot height and 95% opacity standards. 4. The Landscape Plan shall show there will be a 30-foot visual clearance area on both sides of the access drive provided. 5. A street opening permit must be obtained prior to any site work. THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: 6. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained, pursuant to the approved revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History.: The site is currently undeveloped. A pre-application conference was held on February 9, 1999 to construct a 3-story 50,109 square foot office building. To date, no other land use applications have been filed with the City for this site. Vicinity Information: The property abuts the easterly property line of the GM Training Center located on SW Pacific Highway and is across SW Pfaffle Street from a residential zone on the subject property's own northern roperty line. Properties to the east and west are zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). Information and Proposal Description: The site is presently undeveloped. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1 ,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot-high chain link fence topped with three (3) strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. The site would obtain access via an existing accessway from SW Pfaffle Street. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.360.090(A)(1) Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 2 OF 9 The proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan's Professional Commercial designation for the subject property because it complies with the applicable provisions of the Community Development Code, which implement the plan. Compliance with the majority of specific regulations and standards will be addressed further within this decision. Section 18.360.090(A) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses), 18.360.09 .6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.360.090.11 (Public Transit), 18.360.090.14 (Provisions for the disabled) and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage. The applicant has not proposed to remove any existing trees to construct this facility. The topography and natural drainage is not proposed to be altered in any way other then the pad for the monopole accessory units. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Buffering, creening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.4 (A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure is to be screened on the north and the east side with 10, 5-gallon Lugstrum Lucidum. This will screen the facility from the residential zone located to the north of the property. The south and west sides of the lease area will be screened with natural vegetation. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Section 18.360.090.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. As indicated on the site and landscape plan, the enclosure has a natural vegetation buffer surrounding the south and west side from adjoining properties. In addition, the subject site will be screened on the north and east side with 10, 5-gallon Lugstrum Lucidum. Therefore, this standard has been met. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090(A).12 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of existing and proposed shrubs to screen the lease area. However, additional more strict landscaping standards are discussed further in this decision. Underlying Zoning Provisions: Section 18.360.090(A).15 states that all of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments. Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. These standards have been reviewed elsewhere within this decision. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 3 OF 9 dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The site will only have a 30-foot frontage onto SW Pfaffle Street. Therefore, the only impact of the site will be the vehicle access to service the site. This type of impact does not warrant improvements along the entire frontage. Public improvements will be addressed at time of full development of the parcel. Dimensional Requirements: The C-P Zoning District standards are contained in Table 18.520.2. STANDARD C-P Existing Proposed Parcel Monopole Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq. ft 45,302 sq. ft 1,600 sq. ft - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 235 ft 40 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft 0 ft 168 ft. - Side facing street on corner& - - - through lots [1] - Side yard 0/20 ft [3] - 2 ft - Side or rear yard abutting more - - - restrictive zoning district - Rear yard 0/20 ft [3] - 2 ft - Distance between front of garage & - - - property line abutting a public or private street. Maximum height 45 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85 % >85 % Minimum Landscape Requirement 15 % < 15 % The table above compares the applicant's proposal with the minimum dimensional standards of the C-P zone. The entire area proposed for this use is 1 ,600 square feet. Therefore this criterion has been satisfied. Setbacks: Table 18.520.2 states that there is no front, side, or rear yard except 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. This standard is not applicable because the site does not adjoin a residential zoning district. The monopole is 174-feet from the nearest residential zone. FINDING: According to the analysis above, the Commercial zoning standards have been met. Access: Table 18.705.3 states that commercial and industrial uses which have 0-99 pawing spaces will have a minimum of one driveway that is 30 feet wide with a minimum of 24 feet of pavement. The proposed site plan shows a gravel access easement back to the proposed utility lease area. The access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 4 OF 9 Landscaping Plan: Chapter 18.745 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type, and location of proposed and existing shrubs screening the proposed lease area. However, additional more strict landscaping standards are discussed further in this decision. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or private driveway more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040 C. The proposed lease area will have thirty feet of frontage on a public or private street by means of an access drive. For this reason, the street tree planting requirement is not found to be applicable. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: According to the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070 states that the Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340. The off-street parking standards do not require off-street parking spaces for wireless communications facilities. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions have been proposed where the access connects to SW Pfaffle Street. Because the lease area is accessed by a private drive from a public street, a 30-foot visual clearance area shall be maintained on both sides of the access drive. Therefore, this standard will be included in the conditions of approval. Wireless Communications Facilities: Section 18.798.050 provides the following review criteria for new communications towers within commercial zoning districts. Uses Permitted: Towers in Commercial Zones and the I-P Zone - A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I-P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed tower is 45-feet tall. The entire facility is setback 168 feet from the nearest residential zone. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Public Open Space - A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. A Type II adjustment may be obtained to reduce this setback, subject to criteria of approval contained in Section 18.370.020 C8a; This property is not designated as Public Open Space. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 5 OF 9 Collocation in Commercial and Industrial Zones - Collocation of an antenna(s) that extends more than 20 feet above an existing tower or non-tower structure or when collocating more than three providers in commercial and industrial zones; Collocation is not proposed at this time but appears feasible in the future based on the design of the proposed tower and the 25-year lease option. Sprint PCS did look into co- location with another tower further west on SW Pfaffle Street, but the location of the monopole fronts Highway 217 only. Sprint's radio-frequency engineers determined that this monopole would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99 in addition to Highway 217. The second tower that was considered for co-location is located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway. Sprint could not come to agreeable lease terms with the landowner. The landowner required a clause that called for termination of the lease as early as May 2004. Based on the analysis above, co-location is not feasible for the purpose the proposed monopole. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Collocation within a residential zoning district that extends more than 10 feet above a non-tower structure or an existing structure; This property is not designated as residential. Therefore, this standard is not applicable. Accessory Equipment Shelter - Installation of additional accessory equipment shelters or related equipment if required existing landscaping is removed and cannot be replaced on the site to achieve the original intent, or to sufficiently screen any proposed new shelter and/or equipment if the original intent is no longer applicable Accessory equipment is proposed to be located on the concrete slab pad that the tower is located and will not alter the original intent of the site or require any required landscaping to be removed. Therefore, this standard has been met. Towers and Antennas in Public Rights-of-Way - Installation of any tower or antenna within any public right-of-way, provided that such tower or antenna shall be set back from any off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower. This standard is not applicable because the proposed monopole will not be placed in the public right-of-way. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, not all of the criteria have been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Access must comply with the 30-foot-wide access with a minimum 24-foot paved width standard. A 30-foot visual clearance area shall be maintained on both sides of the access drive. Review Criteria: Aesthetic: New towers shall have a non-reflective surface and a neutral color or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to FAA's requirements; The applicant has indicated the surface type to be a non-reflective gray finish that would blend with the surrounding background. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non-tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; and Collocation is not proposed for this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 6 OF 9 ' If collocation on an existing non-tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. Collocation is not proposed for this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Setbacks: Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; The proposed tower is conditioned in this decision to be designed to collapse within itself. The Professional Commercial Zoning District does not have setback requirements except that a 20-foot setback is required where a commercial use adjoins a residential zoning district. Because the site does not adjoin a residential zone, no setbacks are required. Therefore this standard has been satisfied. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The proposed tower is located as close as 2-feet to adjoining properties. The applicant has not indicated that the tower is designed to collapse within itself. Therefore, this criterion has not been met. No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. If, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by Section 18.370.020 C8b; The proposed tower would be approximately 1 ,134 square feet from the nearest existing wireless communications tower on the corner of SW Pfaffle Street and SW Hall Boulevard. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Tower height shall not exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 feet for multiple users; The applicant has proposed a tower height of 45 feet, which is in compliance with this requirement. Therefore this standard is met. No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); The applicant has not proposed any lighting on the tower and the FAA has not reviously required lighting for towers of 45 feet in height. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum 6-foot fence; The applicant has proposed to enclose the lease area around the tower with a 6-foot-high chain link fence. Therefore this standard has been met. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs, which reach 6 feet in height and 95% opacity within 3 years of planting; The applicant has proposed that the fence enclosure will be screened with (10), 5-gallon shrubs but has not produced information on their sizes within 3 years of planting. Therefore, this standard has not been met and will be conditioned for approval. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, free-standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be rescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (11) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 7 OF 9 ' The applicant has not provided screening required by this section or an arborist report. Therefore, this standard has not been met and will be conditioned for approval. Noise generating equipment shall be sound buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 DBA (day)/40 DBA (night) when adjacent to a noise sensitive land use and 75 DBA (day)/60 DBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The applicant has proposed to enclose the associated equipment for this tower inside two (2) accessory equipment cabinets, which are the size of two (2) small refrigerators. According to the (FCC) Federal Communications Commission regulations the facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Finding: Based on the analysis above, not all of the criteria have been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. Conditions: The applicant shall submit construction plans that indicate the monopole will be designed to collapse within itself. Provide a Landscaping Plan showing a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15-feet in height at the time of planting between the proposed monopole tower and the residentially zoned property, prepared by a certified arborist. Include information on the size of the screening around the enclosed area within 3 years of planting Other Requirements: At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state, and Federal regulations, including but not limited to the Oregon Uniform Structural Code, Building Codes and FAA requirements. The applicant is required to comply with the applicable approval standards through the process of obtaining the necessary building permits. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. The City of Tigard Engineering Department reviewed the proposal and has offered no objections or comments. No other comments or objections were received. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered the following comment: E/C permit for area disturbal during construction is required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 8 OF 9 SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 24, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 11, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 10, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . , - • ,�f �, November 23, 1999 PREP A 'ED : : athew Sc idegger DATE Assistant anner ( CF November 23, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers orff DATE Planning Manager is\curpin\Mathew\sdr\sdr1999-00011.dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PAGE 9 OF 9 B . ID t , t72 03 yi IT .i!2.r. i' "t'1} '=��c�'qr r. _ (� _' tG•'l 3'L?1L 1f': M■i 67-'1'li..` _.,—k,. U'-�'''it �i. ' :�.,'i..,s"1 t t�'T atj".li t ".4 .7_17. ,�� n , ...:11.,0 ' '' } Y!I'�• �• iL cs 14 �• a }. .'t.�," )i1t-r•i? +,' ..-t 1�, V ;-—p/ltio� 6,.,o c't'tL_yfL 'r{,� r> „1 df• ,.T.t4'( ,r 1. ..L,� ie} . `k.P., C!:0--'� .I�{ f --o. q\fa `�'I;;i:-e�..0):1 ,I. : S S75 `Sr x SSre S ,, •s-� - -""`„''-,;;"-0,-, ,-. S S 7 r+ :z..7..7° . m gV^D = ................... . a . ` i V 1`t1 (n� i . i '1 it Ill 1. 1 :II •• 'I . I ' . - . .1. • . ' . I * 1 " 1 1 d is 4 t 1 71 Zt1 1,%1;k1-n 1 •: = ,.,I 1. CID I �•• !'I i;.., J'.t.} (� .11 i,.; )'.I. �'I� '1_.)1::: I' �I• 1( 1i.! 1', 1 - .. �,. eu ,-.,., ,..., e, Ul. , r''-, ,.,, I; //�//�� t,:.:- . h1.. t . , .,,. l ,;..M t : ...,), . �....,, = cot EI .' '�}f '. ' , i.% :` •: •,,_ }, •-1 ;' %_, .S •1••. J .. m 1 it 6.;.. <.' 1`_,11 i.. I:, ,a)Z.37 c-' I i`:•. t.• .t`'.' 1'r1 p _L- 4' .tt r,1.`t' s I 0(� :F1_.{ 1,11 t�'"1rt.f ;�.1 ,Ill:-1:t ..+ :1 .1!. C4 Q '•It �ht t ,p Ili' �, '1,'1' 1C' r) ( 7` ',',kr f,1 �; il O :Y"w y' IF,1�4',}'k�`)1 inn 1, 1\.1 t.`'rl 0 1\.' 11 I't ,•.1,,, fit{, IN „ '•t c t ( '1_.1 1 I Aur, 11 1 ±t f�. f I �S..r1 O 1i.,.-!'A�:w''114 te Pb'rn lU Vy .... 11./ ■ ∎1 .1 C '° I • • rrl CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION q ___--- J____., i , ��a Q CITY of TIGARD 2 W ill GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Q -.- N VICINITY MAP n 1111 1 VE ST SDR 1999-00011 LU _ Q w SPRINT PCS _ Q WIRELESS LU MONOPOLE Q - TOWER O ir CI H - W1 /co co t I J 12 / : ,_ :FFLE l -----,________________, • lik 'W,&''\''. \ \ IIPPIP Mik '� L SUBJECT N PROPERT 0 100 200 300 400 Feel r00111"‘i 1'=303 feet 04 4' Ib' City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and 2 should be verified with the Development Services Division �� \ 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)6394171 A, htlp://www.a.tigard.or.ua Community Development Plot date:jul 28, I 999;CAmagic`MAGIC03.APR SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WTDELESS MONOPOLE TOWER (Full DP-ision) Page 1/1 EXHIBIT B RYAN YOUNG SPRINT PCS 7770 SW MOHAWK, BUILDING F TUALATIN OR 97062 ALEX AND LOTTE FINKE, TRUSTEES PO BOX 23562 PORTLAND OR 97281 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • CITY OF TARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community STAVE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L.Lunsforcd being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director E� NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-00011/SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) El City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: ype.'Inc of Notice) FOR: (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEIS) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibl "B", on the 24th day of Nouemb•r 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 24th day of November, 1999, ..stage pre. (Person'that repared, oti/-) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / ; day of '" 4 �✓ OFFICIAL SEAL adN , DIANE M JELDERKS �, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON I t I I I ' ! ' COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Doira5:/ �� F44.4111' A. NOTILt OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00011 X41 CITY OF TIGARD SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CommunityDevefopment Shaping A'Better Community 120 DAYS = 2/3/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER CASE NO: Site Development Review SDR1999-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three (3) sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS OWNER: Alex & Lotte Finke, Trustees Ryan Young, Project Manager P.O. Box 23562 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tigard, OR 97281 Tualatin, OR 97062 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Commercial District. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial District. The C-P zone district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.765, 18.795 and 18.798. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 24, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 11, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 10, 1999. For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. z 0 m , % SW PFAFFLE ST. 5 -.✓i.- ' .i' -"�+''`hrg' T = Z_ ;1{ +`t+ , a .4;_ Z•i r : .„r,�G. }- J �- �: .�A5 F •_ - i_ < -: il'•r• . • i_ • - : ` -, _.=_ _mfr`' H u_ .0.. J = 0 0 is ',tc+*'.-"-i-. � �• -'",;,f. - -_ I=ln'°19°9.1I SITE PLAN 1 S1JR1999-00011 EXHIBIT MAP N SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER E. (map is01W uak) — - —�~ , WOW 1111 VICINITY MAP A =`...- 1111% == SDR 1999-00011 iii _ `- SPRINT PCS MEMO __M=- _ WIRELESS - -MO MEMO �-- ■ (MONOPOLE ___. - - -- - _ - i =.-MO .-= - == TOWER MUM o ' Mar Mgr MR MEW mom wit Alto rim isr- li -2 LE J„ N _ :..„ SUBJECT • • w 1.1. PROPERT 0 AAIL ctyarwa EXHIBIT B Douglas Denny Melinda Curves&Duana Sheldon Luther Branch&Eileen 11185 Sw 79Th Ave 11215 Sw 79Th Ave 11255 Sw 79Th Ave rTigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 1 Helen Loos Thomas&Susan Robinson Robert Knight 7935 Sw Pfaffle St 1527 Lake Front Rd 11290 Sw 79Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Tigard, OR 97223 Michael&Marcheta Craughan Karen&John Pidgeon Everett Rowles&A Patricia 11260 Sw 79Th Ave 11250 Sw 79Th Ave 11200 Sw 79Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Thomas&Kathleen Lowery John&Renee Fisher Sr. Alisha&Eric Hunter 11225 Sw 78Th Ave 7825 Sw Pfaffie St 11155 Sw 82Nd Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Janice Hartung Dwight Donis Davis Helen Pfaffie 11185 Sw 82Nd Ave 11215 Sw 82Nd Ave 8225 Sw Pfaffie St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Cuauhtemoc Ruiz-Prado James&Susan Rorman Bryan Haddix Rosaur Geronimo-Ruiz 11250 Sw 82Nd Ave 11220 Sw 82Nd Ave 8175 Sw Pfaffie St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Thomas Schoeneman&E Mary Herbert Enola Coolman Margaret Estate Petersen 11190 Sw 82Nd Ave 11160 Sw 82Nd Ave 8035 Sw Pfaffie St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Charles&Tamara Dunn James Janice Hein Randy 011ison&A Cindy 11230 Sw 83Rd Ave 11260 Sw 83Rd Ave 11290 Sw 83Rd Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Hieu Ngoc Huynh Murray Wick Stephen Barasch 11320 Sw 83Rd Ave 4460 Alhambra St 485 W Milwaukee St#904 Tigard, OR 97223 San Diego, CA 92107 Detroit,MI 48202 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I PFAFFLE ROAD PARTNERS 11336 Sw Bull Mountain Rd#103 806 Sw Broadway#700 13612 Sw 130Th PI Tigard,OR 97224 Portland, OR 97205 Tigard, OR 97223 N Jeffrey Sorg MONAGHAN FARMS INC CHEVRON U S A INC 24 Aquinas St 14120 E Evans Ave PO Box 285 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Aurora,CO 80014 Houston,TX 77001 • CHEVRON USA INC&PROPERTY TAX Norman Webb Doug,lac&Debra Chapman PO Box 285 11315 Sw 81St Ave 11287 Sw 81St Ave Houston,TX 77001 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Kenneth Barker Julia Dearmond Bradley Tolliver 11263 Sw 81St Ave 11235 Sw 81St Ave 11207 Sw 81St Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Randall Palazzo Matthew&Leslie Muldoon Betty Hamilton 33 Morningview Cir 11155 Sw 81St Ave 11162 Sw 81St Ave Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Melvyn&Doris Harte Colleen Spiering Frank&Christine Chongway 11190 Sw 81St Ave 17815 Ne Courtney Rd 11242 Sw 81St Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Newberg,OR 97132 Tigard,OR 97223 Timothy Mark Ingle Sang Kil&Ok Son Woo ANDREWS MANAGEME.r r 11268 Sw 81St Ave 11300 Sw 81St Ave 11336 Sw .. •ountain Rd#103 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 .:.s • OR 97224 PFAFFLE ROAD • RS Stanley McGrath 13612 S • u Pl 806 Sw Broadway#700 OR 97223 Portland,OR 97205 RYAN YOUNG SPRINT PCS 7770 SW MOHAWK, BUILDING F TUALATIN OR 97062 ALEX AND LOTTE FINKE, TRUSTEES PO BOX 23562 PORTLAND OR 97281 411, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1u CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development SfrapingA Better Community STATE off'OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR1999-0001 I/SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER D AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) Q City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) • City of Tigard Planning Director I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: :-- / AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) _ City of Tigard Planning Director I Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:t ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoiName Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council H NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: L7 I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit rB", n the 8�'day of October, 1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 8!h day of October, 1999, postage p paid. , ;Z7 4/Z 4- s 4 I 74* /: (P that re. -d , • ce) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of � - , -•�- OFFICIAL SEAL / � � ��a y DIANE M JELDERKS NOTA Y PUBLIC OF OR ! � ',., ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 MY Commission Expires: 7/7/Q_3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENF,_ _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI IT A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve4ment Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: October 8, 1999 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-0001 I FILE NAME: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three- sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaffle Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C-P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 22. 1999. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidectger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address. a relevant approval criteria with s .lent specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I Q L ' 1 Oe CITY ofYTIGARDy --I THORN - _ io _ VICINITY MM =.. I( = == ■ SDR 1999-00011 =- .= _■ ■ SDS Wireless, Inc. - --AIM -= -■ Monopole Tower Elm�� --�-, -.- ^low _ LE ■, J irp 111PG\t sustECT NA PROPERT IOC 200 300___M `' J� 'ly -"\ Aldk. • 303 bet tO014 City of Tigard EXHIBIT B Douglas Denny Melinda Curnes&Duana Sheldon Luther Branch&Eilleen 11185 Sw 79Th Ave 11215 Sw 79Th Ave 11255 Sw 79Th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 ■ Helen Loos Thomas&Susan Robinson Robert Knight 7935 Sw Pfaff le St 1527 Lake Front Rd 11290 Sw 79Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Tigard,OR 97223 Michael&Marcheta Craughan Karen&John Pidgeon Everett Rowles&A Patricia 11260 Sw 79Th Ave 11250 Sw 79Th Ave 11200 Sw 79Th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Thomas&Kathleen Lowery John&Renee Fisher Sr. Alisha&Eric Hunter 11225 Sw 78Th Ave 7825 Sw Pfaffle St 11155 Sw 82Nd Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Janice Hartung Dwight Donis Davis Helen Pfaffle 11185 Sw 82Nd Ave 11215 Sw 82Nd Ave 8225 Sw Pfaffle St Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Cuauhtemoc Ruiz-Prado James&Susan Rorman Bryan Haddix Rosaur Geronimo-Ruiz 11250 Sw 82Nd Ave 11220 Sw 82Nd Ave 8175 Sw Pfaffle St Tigard,OR 91223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Thomas Schoeneman&E Mary Herbert Enola Coalman Margaret Estate Petersen 11190 Sw 82Nd Ave 11160 Sw 82Nd Ave 8035 Sw Pfaffle St Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Charles&Tamara Dunn James Janice Hein Randy 011ison&A Cindy 11230 Sw 83Rd Ave 11260 Sw 83Rd Ave 11290 Sw 83Rd Ave Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Hieu Ngoc Huynh Murray Wick Stephen Barasch 11320 Sw 83Rd Ave 4460 Alhambra St 485 W Milwaukee St#904 Tigard, OR 97223 San Diego, CA 92107 Detroit,MI 48202 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I PFAFFLE ROAD PARTNERS 11336 Sw Bull Mountain Rd#103 806 Sw Broadway#700 13612 Sw 130Th P1 Tigard, OR 97224 Portland,OR 97205 Tigard,OR 97223 N Joey Sorg MONAGHAN FARMS INC CHEVRON U S A INC 24 Aquinas St 14120 E Evans Ave PO Box 285 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Aurora,CO 80014 Houston,TX 77001 • CHEVRON USA INC&PROPERTY TAX Norman Webb Douglas&Debra Chapman PO Box 285 11315 Sw 81St Ave 11287 Sw 81St Ave Houston,TX 77001 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Kenneth Barker Julia Dearmond Bradley Tolliver 11263 Sw 81St Ave 11235 Sw 81St Ave 11207 Sw 81St Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Randall Palazzo Matthew&Leslie Muldoon Betty Hamilton =. 33 Morningview Cir 11155 Sw 81St Ave 11162 Sw 81St Ave --- Lake Oswego,OR 97035 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Melvyn&Doris Harte Colleen Spiering Frank&Christine Chongway 11190 Sw 81St Ave 17815 Ne Courtney Rd 11242 Sw 81St Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Newberg,OR 97132 Tigard, OR 97223 Timothy Mark Ingle Sang Kil&Ok Son Woo ANDREWS MANAGE t ►r "r 11268 Sw 81St Ave 11300 Sw 81St Ave 11336 Sw : .. •ountain Rd#103 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 •:.' •,OR 97224 PFAFFLE ROAD RS Stanley McGrath 13612 S h P1 806 Sw Broadway#700 OR 97223 Portland,OR 97205 RYAN YOUNG SPRINT PCS 7770 SW MOHAWK, BUILDING F TUALATIN OR 97062 ALEX AND LOTTE FINKE, TRUSTEES PO BOX 23562 PORTLAND OR 97281 I - -.) : * C�tS>-\ 612.2-/ �.,__.✓t • `e 6 bL) LG t sFEtt4 PCB SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ;Ail' TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: J\k-- DATE OF PRE-APP.: Lk-(2-219 1' Property Address/Location(s): 0060 SW /�'{k-rfle 17?/-,1 , �J� q 701 2 3 FR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): Lc NC D — OD 600 Case No.(s): Sl7R /ill—OcGp/ Other Case No.(s): 'OM Site Size: Receipt No.: `C 9-7/49-7/1 Application Accepted By: 4- Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: V! 7-15- ' Address: P. O. Box 23562 Phone: 244-5824 City: Tigard, Ore . Zip: 97281 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: ry41( r6u,16 j . :Sf'/A/T,r/ CS Address: 11 10 St ) Adattiwll , Fi//1/ //1/6 P Comp Plan/Zone Designation: hone:��3) 6/2-lU l� City: 11/kLA-t/6// 0/2— Zip: g706,,1 CIT Area: brrikat, * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpin\masterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY a'reApplication Form [/Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Titl .Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): �� -- _Site/Plot Plan �v /3r- �rt (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ,-0 Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") 0 Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Construction Cost Estimate yUSA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) r❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes Q' Filing Fee (Under$100,000) ,.$_8_,D0 nn 1, ($100,000-$999,999)....$1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as • part of this application: t K II APPLICANTS: II To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. L DATED this day of .�� , 19 ?, Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Aa Ii_ CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 2/3/2000 FILE NO(S).: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-0001 FILE TITLE: SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER APPLICANT: Ryan Young OWNERS: Alex and Lotte Finke, Trustees Sprint PCS PO Box 23562 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Portland, OR 97281 Tualatin, OR 97062 PHONE/FAX: (503) 612-1012 (503) 244-5824 REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a 45-foot-high monopole tower with a three-sector panel antenna mount and a cement-raised platform to place associated equipment cabinets. The facility will be surrounded by a six-foot-high chain link fence. LOCATION: 8060 SW Pfaff le Street; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 00600. The subject site is located east of SW Hall Boulevard. ZONE: C-P; Professional/Administrative Commercial District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520 and 18.798. CIT AREA: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: October 8, 1999 DUE: October 22, 1999 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: - ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP © NARRATIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL PLAN © SITE PLAN ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TECH REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 317 SDR1999-00011 SPRINT PCS WIRELESS MONOPOLE TOWER LAND USE PROPOSAL /4...40 .1. August 10, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Sprint PCS Attn Ryan Young/John Brosy 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tualatin, OR 97062 l S r,in 1'C5 \+ = RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal - SDR 1999-00011 (SDSWireless-Monopole Tower) Dear Mr. Young and Mr. Brosy: The City has received your request for Site Development Review approval for the above- referenced project on SW Pfaffle Street. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete. The following clarifications and additional information are required before your application can be considered complete and Staff can begin the review: 1. Provide 2 sets of undated mailing envelopes for property owners within 500 feet of the project site. The envelopes you submitted are postage metered for a July 15, 1999 mailing date. The United States Postal Service will only accept dated envelopes for mailing on the date specified. Please call to arrange collection of the envelopes; you should be able to arrange a credit for the unused postage. 2. Provide a master list of the property owners within 500 feet of the site. Your list should be in the form of a photocopy of the label sheet(s) used to generate the mailing envelopes. This will enable the City to generate additional sets of labels for future mailings (for example, in the event of an appeal). 3. Provide 12 additional sets of your application materials. The City usually requires 20 sets for Site Development Review. However, an assessment of the probable extent of agency notification for this application indicates that a total of 14 sets will be adequate. Once the required information has been submitted, Staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171. Sinc= e , / I , iith M. J. Roberts Associate Planner i:\curpinlmark\sdr\sdr99-11.inc c: SDR 99-0011 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Pi CITY OF TIGARD October 7, 1999 OREGON Mr. Ryan Young Mr. John Brosy Sprint PCS 7770 SW Mohawk, Building F Tualatin, OR 97062 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal — SDR1999-00011 (Sprint PCS Monopole Tower) Dear Mr. Young and Mr. Brosy: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application, or, if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x417. Sincerely, .."3" ice► Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner c: SDR1999-00011 Land Use file is\curpin\mathew\Sdr\SprintPCS 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 r- .,. _ar ^, a seat— - -- c ' WARRANTY DEED--STATUTORY FORM (7? „1 S, (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) I (`7 11/ Ted L. Millar, Trustee of the Ted L. Millar Living Trust, an Oregon Trust Grantor,conveys and warrants to Alex Finke (aka Alex E. and/or Alexander E. 'inks) and Latta I. Finkio (aka Lottie and/or Lotto Finks), Trustees U.'J<`:A. dated-oat:'2Sr"1991•'(ALOCTI= .ra,.r .. ...,r..!A..a c _h.11 r ,e r_r«_ V. va..hr r..i.. r..►rt.. .AA/.w 1_.tit 14..Y.1 ►..A Grantee,the following described real property free of encumbrances except sa specifically set forth herein: * Alex Finke (aka Alex E. and/or Alexander E. Finke), Trustees U.T.A. dated Oct. 25, 1991 (Lotto I. Finks Trust), an undivided one-half (1/2) interest, all as tenants in Ccarm • ** See attached legal description as Exhibit 'A' and by reference made becanea a part hereof 1 Thus Instrument will riot allow use of the property described its this instrument In violation of applicable land } use laws and regulations.Before signing or accepting this Instrument,the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to detsrrnne any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined In ORS 30.930. Encumbrances: The Statutory powers & assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency Exchange of Property The true consideration for this conveyance is S U (Here comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030'). Dated this 6 day of "taX 19.9,if a corporate grantor,it as caused i to be signed by order of Its board of directors. Q • Ted L. Millar. Trustee of the Ted L. Miller bricadeapObsztels .Liming.Truat - - STATE OF ORIGON, I STATE OF OREGON.County of Ias- Counry of /nal/Al?7a[-' I as ,to _ G ,to yV t Personalty appeared star --- Pe.sonafly sad dy above named who,being duly sworn. - ....Ted. ...tti l,lac..Trustee..of.the each for himself and not one for the of er.ee say that the lbrme.is ___ ....Ted.L..Mi11er..L.iviag.Trust the president and mat the tenet is Vs _ - q� and edinowtedged the foregoing rostra,- secretary of the .....- meal to be..!.749 voluntary set and deed. .a corporation.and that said instrument --- was signed in belied of said corporation by authority of Its board of Motors: Delos ray- and each of them adinowledged said instrument to be es voluntary ad end mow. deed. l Balers ma: �"'-_ N�a orCnigon �+ OFFICIAL SEAL . �'^' I: VARY M.WiPQEAtAN "r My eM' C;/ NOTARYPtf3LIC•OREOON `.:'/ COMYISSiONNOATECI° Notary Public to/Oregoe 1:,;: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OEC.21,l ex MY commiss:on capers 1:::72::•1f the mnaideratbn oon,ista d w kldudes other property or ve'us.War tM tdbvArg:"The ectuat consideration cons:ate of or includes 00w property or value given ur promised which is part d the whole carslderation(indlcate wt ctiy. . r,,.Tg,A„ Milton Trustee of the Ted L. Mill '' .Living..Txuat r Grantor's Name and Address al'r wr Alex Finke, Tru 3 M,, Lop I. FinJte, Trustee -- Orataas's Nasty and Address After wording return to: .Alex.t..Lotte.Finke..Trustee - Ern.A...BAx.235b 2 ;._. ..Partlend,.AR.9.Z2a1. — Name.Address.ao _ Until a change is requested at lac statements Mal be sent to lee 1o/tee- ing ad,'tiaa. same as above t a I Nam*.Addrssa.ad OM.3031CT S4-4t f — r ,'.�. • •rc 1 .ti ._r• •_ `".t.n.-7i"-- ∎31 • ±-•,:e .,v•.7 ±F�!-t-#. ems` .'!'. _—yr_-+� s�sw Fl ,. - •- + — - .....:1..�........w_....F.+. :.. r.-: . . LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Tigard Date Received ATTN: A. ,� 7-2,44 - �- RECEIVED DEPT: q- i'p-11 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT From: �,1�l�; Po S,15 Contact Name: T.'.J k? t'--<\J, Project Name: elf ' ' 4'YO C‘ C (C C Phone: SF °-5 - 1`S 7-1 - Fax: Comments Weather. SUNNY Sheet Number 15 of 17 Site ID: PO29XC006 Site Candidate ID: C Site Name: CASH/VACANT LAND Construction Cost Estimate CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE PROPOSED LABOR MATERIAL _ TOTAL _ 1. Demolition - - - 2. Steel Framing 1,000 5,000 6,000 3. Structural Improvement - - - 4. Site Work 500 2000 2,500 5. Access Road 3,000 3000 6,000 6. Interior Space Improvement - - - 7. Equipment Foundation 1,000 1500 2,500 8. Pole/Tower Foundation 3,000 3,500 6,500 9. Pole/Tower Erection - - - 10. Crane Cost 1,000 1,000 2,000 11. Coaxial Cable and Raceway 2,000 1,000 3,000 12. Antenna Mounting Supports 750 2,000 2,750 3. Fencing 4,000 1,000 5,000 .4. Landscaping - - - 15. Trenching 3,000 400 3,400 16. Site Telco 3,000 6,000 9,000 17. Site Electrical 7,000 10,000 17,000 18. Grounding (Included in Item 17) 19. Installation of Antennas and Cable 3,000 3,000 6,000 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. TOTAL 32,250 39,400 71,650 Version 1 Sprint PCS-West Region 4/5/99 Proprietary and Confidential ,°roposai/Ahzr rccHve_ Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS „-0 till \lohauk I1�;�latin. OR 9-1162 llailstop ORTI -110101 \Dice ;03 612. 1000 lay iO3 612 I Iii July 8, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Site Development Review application for Sprint PCS Dear Mr. Roberts: On behalf of Sprint PCS, we are submitting the following materials for a Site Development Review application. Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot high monopole tower at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard to provide wireless communication service. Please find attached the supporting information for a Site Design Review application: A. Completed Site Development Review Type II Application form. B. Supporting Site Development Review Application materials(three copies) Attachment 1: Project Description and Site Development Review Criteria Attachment 3: RF letter re: co-location Attachment 4: WPCS lease language Attachment 5: Neighborhood Meeting materials C. Construction Drawings(three sets) D. Filing Fee: A check for$800.00 is attached for a Site Design Review Application. Thank you for your time in reviewing our application for a Site Design Review Application. Please contact me at(503) 612- 1041 should you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, mss- • all 0 John . Brosy, • ' Pro:•ct Manager PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sprint PCS is in the process of improving its Personal Communications System (PCS) network in the Portland Metropolitan region. To provide improved wireless communication service to the area along Highway 99 and Highway 217, Sprint proposes to include a new site located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Commercial Professional (CP) and has a Commercial comprehensive plan designation. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. At the base of the tower, Sprint would place a concrete pad for its ground equipment. On the concrete pad would stand Sprint's accessory equipment cabinets,which are the size of two small refrigerators. Sprint's Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna would also be located on the equipment pad. The GPS antenna would be operational, and approximately 4"high x 8" long x 4" wide. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Sprint's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. A Sprint technician for routine maintenance requires approximately one visit per month once the site is constructed. SPRINT PCS TECHNOLOGY Sprint PCS is the largest PCS provider in the United States. Similar to cellular technology, Sprint PCS systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station are located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of a refrigerator. The proposed Sprint base station at this site would include two radio cabinets and one power cabinet located on a concrete pad. The concrete pad would provide for future radio cabinets as capacity demands. PURPOSE AND NEED Sprint PCS is in the process of expanding its wireless communications network to areas outside of the Portland Metropolitan region, and is also improving its service to areas within the metropolitan areas to comply with its FCC license requirements. The need for improved service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Sprint's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area("search ring") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objective. The purpose of the proposed site is to provide improved service to this portion of Highway 99 and Highway 217 in the City of Tigard. It is crucial for Sprint PCS to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.090 Approval Criteria The proposed use would be located at the southwest corner of the property, and set back from the nearest public road, SW Pfaffle Street (see construction drawings — Al Site Plan). The location would preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Sprint's proposed landscaping plan would provide a natural buffering and screening around the proposed lease area. The screening around the entire lease area would result in a more compatible appearance with the surrounding land uses (see construction drawings—A2 Equipment Area Plan). A six-foot high chain link fence would surround Sprint's entire lease area for security purposes. The site is unmanned, and would be accessible to a Sprint technician for maintenance purposes only. A Sprint technician would visit the site approximately once per month for maintenance. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT (18.520) The proposed use would be located within the Commercial Professional (C-P) zoning district. The C-P district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. The provision of a wireless communications facility in the C-P zone would support business and professional services in the coverage area, and would also provide a service to the neighboring residential areas as well. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Review Criteria (18.798.050 B) The proposed Sprint monopole would maintain a non-reflective gray finish that would blend with the surrounding background. There are no setbacks for a tower in the C-P zone; however, the proposed tower would be located to the rear of the property, setback from SW Pfaff le Street (see construction drawings —Al Site Plan). Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot monopole, which meets the height requirement of 100-feet for a single user(18.798.050 B 4). Sprint's entire lease area, which includes the monopole and the equipment cabinets, would be completely surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence for security purposes. In compliance to section 18.798.050 B 7, Sprint will provide landscaping around the fenced lease area, consisting of evergreen shrubs. The proposed landscaping would add to the natural screening of the site, and none of the existing trees will be removed (see construction drawings L1 Landscaping Plan). Tower Separation and Co-location The proposed use would not be located within 500 feet of an existing tower in the area. The co-location protocol was completed per section 18.798.080 prior to the pre- application conference meeting with City of Tigard staff on 4/22/99. Two sites were identified as potential co-location candidates in the area. Sprint initially identified a monopole tower located further west on SW Pfaff le Street, which is owned and operated by AT&T. Unfortunately, the AT&T monopole fronts Highway 217 only. Sprint's radio-frequency engineers determined that this monopole would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99 in addition to Highway 217 (see Attachment 3 - RF letter). The other tower that was identified for co-location is the WPCS ("VoiceStream") monopole at 11744 Highway 99W. Sprint could not come to agreeable lease terms with the landowner. The current landowner and WPCS have an executed lease that was signed on May 10, 1996. The lease contains a clause that allows the landowner to terminate his contract, and require WPCS to take down the existing monopole as early as May 2004 at the owner's request (see Attachment 4 - WPCS lease language). The current owner did confirm with Sprint that he is interested in selling his property soon. If Sprint were to co-locate onto the WPCS monopole, the landowner requested that Sprint abide by the same termination clause in the lease. If the tower were to be taken down at the landowner's request, Sprint would have to look for a new tower as early as 2004. Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at the Richard M. Brown Auditorium in the City of Tigard. A list with the attendees and a copy of the Minutes from the meeting are attached. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sprint PCS is in the process of improving its Personal Communications System (PCS) network in the Portland Metropolitan region. To provide improved wireless communication service to the area along Highway 99 and Highway 217, Sprint proposes to include a new site located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Commercial Professional (CP) and has a Commercial comprehensive plan designation. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. At the base of the tower, Sprint would place a concrete pad for its ground equipment. On the concrete pad would stand Sprint's accessory equipment cabinets, which are the size of two small refrigerators. Sprint's Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna would also be located on the equipment pad. The GPS antenna would be operational, and approximately 4"high x 8" long x 4" wide. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Sprint's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Approximately one visit per month is required by a Sprint technician for routine maintenance once the site is constructed. SPRINT PCS TECHNOLOGY Sprint PCS is the largest PCS provider in the United States. Similar to cellular technology, Sprint PCS systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station are located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of a refrigerator. The proposed Sprint base station at this site would include two radio cabinets and one power cabinet located on a concrete pad. The concrete pad would provide for future radio cabinets as capacity demands. PURPOSE AND NEED Sprint PCS is in the process of expanding its wireless communications network to areas outside of the Portland Metropolitan region, and is also improving its service to areas within the metropolitan areas to comply with its FCC license requirements. The need for improved service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Sprint's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area("search ring") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objective. The purpose of the proposed site is to provide improved service to this portion of Highway 99 and Highway 217 in the City of Tigard. It is crucial for Sprint PCS to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.090 Approval Criteria The proposed use would be located at the southwest corner of the property, and set back from the nearest public road, SW Pfaff le Street (see construction drawings — Al Site Plan). The location would preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage. Sprint's proposed landscaping plan would provide a natural buffering and screening around the proposed lease area. The screening around the entire lease area would result in a more compatible appearance with the surrounding land uses (see construction drawings—A2 Equipment Area Plan). A six-foot high chain link fence would surround Sprint's entire lease area for security purposes. The site is unmanned, and would be accessible to a Sprint technician for maintenance purposes only. A Sprint technician would visit the site approximately once per month for maintenance. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT (18.520) The proposed use would be located within the Commercial Professional (C-P) zoning district. The C-P district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. The provision of a wireless communications facility in the C-P zone would support business and professional services in the coverage area, and would also provide a service to the neighboring residential areas as well. The proposed site does not have any setback requirements in the C-P zone (Table 18.520.2). Additional Development Review Standards for a wireless communication facility in the City of Tigard are reviewed in Chapter 18.798 Wireless Communications Facilities, which is addressed below. T - proposed :- •. permitted :•-ct to Site D- op ent Review :. '8.050.A. th City of 'igard. As pre •.usly • ention-:, Sprint p►•poses t. onstru a 45- .ot h' onopo - tower 1•cate• n the Co- er•'al Professional (C ' zone in e C. ofT':ard. e • lowing is . •:rrative ad. es • g the Review ' • ria for the • Tigar, s code s- ion 18.798.051B. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES Review Criteria (18.798.050 B) The proposed Sprint monopole would maintain a non-reflective gray finish that would blend with the surrounding background. There are no setbacks for a tower in the C-P zone; however, the proposed tower would be located to the rear of the property, setback from SW Pfaffle Street (see construction drawings — Al Site Plan). Sprint proposes to construct a 45-foot monopole, which meets the height requirement of 100-feet for a single user(18.798.050 B 4). Sprint's entire lease area, which includes the monopole and the equipment cabinets, would be completely surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence for security purposes. In compliance to section 18.798.050 B 7, Sprint will provide landscaping around the fenced lease area, consisting of evergreen shrubs. The proposed landscaping would add to the natural screening of the site, and none of the existing trees will be removed (see construction drawings—L1 Landscaping Plan). Tower Separation and Co-location The proposed use would not be located within 500 feet of an existing tower in the area. The co-location protocol was completed per section 18.798.080 prior to the pre- application conference meeting with City of Tigard staff on 4/22/99. Two sites were identified as potential co-location candidates in the area. Sprint initially identified a monopole tower located further west on SW Pfaff le Street, which is owned and operated by AT&T. Unfortunately, the AT&T monopole fronts Highway 217 only. Sprint's radio-frequency engineers determined that this monopole would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99 in addition to Highway 217 (see Attachment 3 -RF letter). The other tower that was identified for co-location is the WPCS ("VoiceStream") monopole at 11744 Highway 99W. Sprint could not come to agreeable lease terms with the landowner. The current landowner and WPCS have an executed lease that was signed on May 10, 1996. The lease contains a clause that allows the landowner to terminate his contract, and require WPCS to take down the existing monopole as early as May 2004 at the owner's request (see Attachment 4 - WPCS lease language). The current owner did confirm with Sprint that he is interested in selling his property soon. If Sprint were to co-locate onto the WPCS monopole, the landowner requested that Sprint abide by the same termination clause in the lease. If the tower were to be taken down at the landowner's request, Sprint would have to look for a new tower as early as 2004. Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at the Richard M. Brown Auditorium in the City of Tigard. A list with the attendees and a copy of the Minutes from the meeting are attached. SprinSprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS t it >11 11��1i:n,k 11:aLitin. nR � nn' \I,ti1>I1, 111;11 \\UIH Vice Win; 012. loon H\ April 21, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Co-location evaluation Dear Mr. Roberts: Sprint PCS is proposing to construct a 45' monopole tower for the purpose of wireless communications. The proposed site is located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, and has a Commercial Professional (CP) zoning designation. The existing AT&T monopole to the west of the proposed site was identified for the purpose of co-location. However, the AT&T monopole faces the Highway 217 corridor. Co-location onto the monopole would not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, which are to provide service to 99W from the 1-5 intersection to Main Street. Because co-location onto this tower does not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street. It is crucial for Sprint to provide the adequate coverage in this part of the City of Tigard in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. Sincerely, /14' /6/T Steve Kartz Senior RF Engineer for Sprint PCS 03/18/1999 16:05 503635x/"'9 TIGARD VET HOSE- _ PAGE 05 8. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further Iiability as follows: (a) upon thirty (30) days' written notice by Landlord for failure to cure a material default for payment of amounts due under this Lease within that thirty (30)-day period; (b) upon thirty (30) days' written notice by either party if the other party defaults and fails to cure or commence curing such default within that thirty (30)- day period, or such longer period as may be required to diligently complete a cure commenced within that thirty (30)-day period; (c) upon ninety (90) days' written notice by Tenant, if it is unable to obtain, maintain, or otherwise forfeits or cancels any license, permit or Governmental Approval necessary to the installation and/or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant's business; (d) upon ninety (90) days' written notice by Tenant if the Property, Building or the Antenna Facilities are or become unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering specifications for its Antenna Facilities or the communications system to which the Antenna Facilities belong; (e) immediately upon written notice if the Premises or the Antenna Facilities are destroyed or damaged so as in Tenant's reasonable judgment to substantially and adversely affect the effective use of the Antenna Facilities. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction, and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant; (f) at the time title of the Property transfers to a condemning authority, pursuant to a taking of all or a portion of the Property sufficient in Tenant's determination to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant's use. Landlord and Tenant shall each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards with respect to such taking. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power, shall be treated as a taking by condemnation. (g) by landlord, after expiration of the Year Seven (7) by giving at least twelve (12) months' written notice to Tenant. 9. Taxes. Tenant shall pay any personal property taxes assessed on, or any portion of such taxes attributable to, the Antenna Facilities. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other fees and assessments attributable to the Property. In the event that Landlord fails to pay said real property taxes, then Tenant shall have the right to pay said taxes and deduct them from Rent amounts due under this agreement. PO-1373-8.SLO 5 Minutes from 6/1/99 Neighborhood Meeting Location: Richard M. Brown Auditorium (Tigard Water District) Attendees: See attached The neighborhood meeting began at approximately 7:00pm. The attached sign- up list includes those who attended the meeting and a copy of the Neighborhood meeting Agenda is included. Ryan Young introduced himself and John Brosy as representatives for Sprint PCS, and Mr. Young gave a ten-minute presentation about Sprint PCS, its technology, and the need for the proposed site. A description of the presentation's outline is as follows: Why Sprint is proposing a site? A. Coverage objective (Hwy 99 and Hwy 217 in Tigard) B. Inability to co-locate on two identified monopoles in the area. II. About Sprint PCS technology A. Largest Personal Communication System (PCS) in US. B. "Cells" or geographic coverage needs C. Infrastructure required III. How a site is determined A. Need for additional capacity B. Engineering identifies target area and conducts a propagation study. After Mr. Young made his presentation, the meeting was open for questions and discussion with the aid of preliminary drawings and photographs. The questions that were asked are described below in italics, followed by our response. 1. Why wouldn't Sprint locate on the smaller tower down the Road? The monopole tower down the road on Pfaffle St. fronts Highway 217 only. This tower was initially identified for co-location purposes, but Sprint's RF engineers determined that it would not provide the necessary coverage along Highway 99. 2. What about the other tower? The WPCS ("VoiceStream") monopole tower was also identified for co-location. Sprint pursued co-location opportunities with WPCS; however, Sprint could not agree with lease language with the landowner. The current landowner (Hans Grunbaum) and WPCS have an executed lease that contains a clause that allows the landowner to terminate his contract, requiring WPCS to take down the monopole. The monopole could be taken down as early as May 2004 at the owner's request. Mr. Grunbaum did confirm with Sprint PCS, during initial conversations, that he is interested in possibly selling his property soon. If Sprint were to co-locate, the landowner requested that Sprint abide by the same clause in the lease re: termination of the contract and taking down the tower. Accepting those terms is unacceptable to Sprint because Sprint may have to look for a new tower within four years. Sprint's lease requires a 25-year term that is renewed and terminated only by Sprint. 3. What is inside of the lease area? The entire lease area is a 40' x 40' space. Inside of the fenced lease area would be the Sprint monopole and near the base of the tower would stand Sprint's equipment cabinets. 4. Are there any concerns with waves or radiation — conflicts with other technology? No. There are no concerns with waves or radiation because the Federal Government has concluded that no evidence or studies suggest that wireless communication facilities are associated with giving radiation to people. Further, the proposed facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the FCC regulation of radio transmissions. 5. Will there only be a small building inside of the lease area? No. Sprint does not require an equipment building inside of its lease area for the radio equipment. Sprint only uses equipment cabinets that are the approximate size of two small refrigerators. 6. What kind of wall or screening would be around the facilities? Landscaping and screening will be provided around Sprint's proposed lease area. A brick wall would not be constructed to provide screening. Usually a wall is constructed around a site when there is a building next to it, and adding a wood or brick fence results in a more compatible appearance. In this case, vegetation and planting would be more appropriate to the site. 7. Will there be an easement to the site? Yes, Sprint has already worked with the landowner to receive an easement for access to the property, which is included in the lease. 8. When do you expect to build? The exact construction start has not been determined by Sprint. However, once Sprint submits an application for land use review, most likely, you could estimate construction starting during the end of 1999 or early 2000. 9. Will there still be room for leasing the rest of the property? Yes. There will still be sufficient space for the landowner to lease space for other uses or propose additional construction. 10. Does the tower itself only receive calls? The monopole tower would both transmit and receive phone calls. 11. Will we receive further notice if you proceed with the project? Yes. Once we submit an application to the city for land use review, and City of Tigard Planning staff makes a decision, all neighbors within 500' of the site will be notified of staff's decision. 12. Did you try to lease from the GM building? Yes. However, General Motors did not show any interest in leasing space for Sprint's antennas. In addition, the GM building's height would not provide the needed coverage, based on a Sprint engineer's determination. The GM building is located at a level much lower than the site where the monopole would be constructed. The residents appreciated Sprint's efforts in making time to meet with them and try to answer any of their questions/concerns. The meeting was then adjourned. ATTENDANCE ROSTER MEETING DATE: 0I qq PLEASE PRINT! NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE PHONE # V\A `(Duel 6-,4�. 7170 sw nh au k "Tuk,art(n1 ,02 6/2 -ro i Z ZO\k■ y04cTs 1 110 SW fM04W'Z cotLt i, it-c yore Ff hnk Gh cft ,,,, \ 3 w 81 „d OR, 97??? 96 turzci-iNt C40,, I )?-1-P- Sw. 8 ) ft' TT3 441 OA 9/»? 3 76 - ��1z7 laN ?s)atitic44 Zeicket -if i 1f �'� 3 _ 044-8J-1�— C a P L A o L 1 1 0 6 5— r-Fj C A r i , 7'7 J- a_ 3 . w Z I . 39- 4472 $K/AN /-14jrx /2 5&) 8 ZN Q � � 977z3 Gilitz Q. ' \ 1 z :S •• q\loans\q)conwaylsrgn_in ooc STA Name of Applicant Christensen Engineering, Inc. Subject Property: Tax Lot(s) 600 Tax Map(s) 1 S l 36 CD Address or General Location SW Pfaffle Road, Tigard,Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, Everett Christensen , do swear or affirm that I am (represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed Commercial Development affecting the land located at 8000 SW Pfaffle Road, Tigard, Oregon , and that pursuant to Ordinance 2050, Section 126,and the guidelines set out by the Planning Director, did on the 21" day of January , 19 99 personally post the notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a City of Tigard Development application. The sign was posted at Pfaffle Road. (state location on property) RECEIVED AN 2 81999 This 21 day of January, 19 99. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Signature 7 Subscribed and sworn to, or affirmed, before me this a2-71/ day of _.7:4,ve. t,e y 06,14444( kitt..4./.4.4c Notary Public for the State of Oregon ._-"��_ OFFICIAL SEAL ' •%��:•►. CLARANN MACHERI(`NE r NOTARY PUBLIC—OREQON COMMUNION NO.314671 MY common'EXPIRES AUGUST a 200^ My commission expires: 8-2-.,200.11. P:\DOCS\Clerical\NRM\POSTAFFB.WPD e2%' ' /9 7 Jpr]nl Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS - -t) S\ 11 ha.�K Tualatin. OR 9-0h. Uailstup ORTI;\010I May 7, 1999 %oice 503 i12 1000 Far 503 h l_' 113; RE: Sprint PCS Wireless Telecommunication Site #P029XC006-C Address: 8060 SW Pfaffle, City of Tigard, Oregon Dear Interested Party: Sprint PCS proposes to construct a 45' monopole for the purpose of installing wireless telecommunication antennas. The proposed site is located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard and has a Commercial Professional (CP) zoning designation. Sprint's objective is to provide wireless telephone service, in compliance with its FCC license obligations, to 99W covering the area from the I-5 intersection to Main Street. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting: Day and bate: Tuesday, June 1, 1999 Venue: City of Tigard Meeting Room - Richard M. Brown Auditorium Address: 13125 5.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 Time: 7:00 PM Please notice: this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you more specifically. Please call me at 503-612-1012 if you have any questions. Sincerely, v .q, R n Young Project Manager AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING State of Oregon ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Susan Brown, being duly sworn, depose and say that on May 11, 1999, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 8060 SW Pfafe Street in the City of Tigard, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 19190 SW 90th Avenue, Tualatin, Oregon, with postage prepaid thereon. Susan Brown (in the presence of a Notary Public) Dated: 5- /l- 9/ Subscribed and sworn b fore me on the 11`h day of May, 1999. ti""iallir" Al . I•• Notary Public of Oregon My ommiStiQII Pvpirec• 2,'5 , 013 .0 OFFICIAL SEAL z'4 - MICHAEL R.GEDDE$ NOTARY PU8LiC-OREGON MY COMMISSION EES AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING State of Oregon ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Michael Geddes, do affirm that I represent Sprint PCS, the party initiating interest in a proposed wireless telecommunication facility on the land located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, and did on the 11`h day of May, 1999, personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a land use application for same, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at the front of the property near the right-of-way where it can easily be seen b I eighbors and p. .sersby. Mic s ael Geddes (in the presence of a Notary Public) Dated: Subscribed and sworn to before me on the 11`h day of May, 1999. Notary Public of Oregon My Commission Expires: 2 -3 =26 a3 • OFFICIAL SEAL SUSAN C.BROWN Ji NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �_ COMMISSION NO.320354 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.3,2003 1 4rSpritit. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 100 12rp Swiss PCS" PLEASANTON, CA 94588 / I HPROJECT INFORMATION: CASH/VACANT LAND — ......vippr ® P029XC006•C )1481 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 WASHINGTON COUNTY Sprint PCS SM fCURRENT ISSUE DATE: 1 7/1/99 CASH/VACANT L�4ND ZONING FREV.:=DATE:—DESCRIPTION: BY:= P029XC006-C 11481 SW HALL BLVD. I TIGARD, 4R 9722 7/1/99 ON NC MT /1\ ISSUED FOR L� 5/11/99 ZONING OD —PLANS PREPARED BY. .' THE PROJECT COHISFTS a< THE 815TA/.L.AO N AND OPERATION OF ALL T K AND MATERIALS SHALL 3E PERFORMED AND INSTALLED C w SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. DELTA GROUPS ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CABNETS FOR SPRINT ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT _pITgNS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS AE FAD B5 THE LOCAL TRUF0 TO AUTHORITIES.WOR NO7H1NC N Ti TITLE SHEET 2 ENGINEERING.AMC. SPECTRUM'S PERSONAL COMMUNN'.ATKN SERVICES (PCS) RINT SS AS AD FLANS i5 i0 BE CONSTRL 1 TO PERMIT WORK NOT tELEC01M1NGT1ON5 NETWORK. A TOTAL OF NINE ANTENNAS CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. MOUNTED ON A STEEL MONOPOLE AND NINE EQUIPMENT CABINETS C A ISIAIING MINIM RE PROPOSED AT THIS SITE, BOTH THE MONOPOLE AND THE I.UIRSRM atDNS COLE 1994 N.AI&/E14-222-F LEE 19575 LS1 SURVEY SHEET , EQUIPMENT 6IL1.BE INSTALLED AT GRACE ADJACENT TO AN Z 9AO4IG OFFOULS WQ COOE COOS WIN-101-1990 EXISTING BIRDRNG. AOKE9TRATORS(BOG) 1993 5.UWOIN PJ COOS 1994 Al SATE PLAN 2 STON[RJCA DRIVE SLIT? 1,9 3 ARON IROAANCAL CODE 1994 1 WOOL=TIM COOS 1996 A2 ION,CA 94366 MCC- 7.1. L E 5OA091NICES A2 EOMPYUIT AREA PLAN,KEY PLAN.EOUDMENT LAYOUT t ANTENNA LATCUT 2 925-468-0115 FA.r 925-469-5355 v o z m A3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION h ELEVAT DNS. EOUPMENi ELEVATIONS 2 =CONSULTANT: _ N CODE COMPLIANCE SW PFAFFLE ST 111 W W eF� h�qr� �� `� PLICANT/LESSEE ARCHITECT: ® L 466J CHABOT DRIVE, SLATE 100 DELTA GROUPS ENGINEERING 9'1->` TIGARD PLEASANTON. CA 94588 5990 SINEW/GE OR. 1119 IMPLEIENTATION MUM: TOM HOSMER PLEASANTON. CA 94566 W C PHONE: 925-466-7858 CONTACT: PATRICK Pp1ND. , PHONE: (925) 468-01tS FAX (925) 466-0}SS —DRAWN BY CHIC.:=AW.: g PROPERTY INFORMATION STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MRT [f> / r 'EL OWNER: .TERRY CASH (RE AGENT FOR OWNER) —LICENSLIRE: J ADORE55 12525 SW MAN STREET DELTA TONERS ENGINEERING 5990 STONERICA DR. /t 19 TtGARO.AR 97212 CONTACT.PLEASANTON. CA 94566 CONTACT: CONTACT: ALBERT TENG PFIOFE. 503-939-4137 7 PHONE: (925)488-0115 FAA: (925) 469-0353 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: VICINITY MAP 'aL ,...EA OF CONSTRUCTION: 1.600 So. FT. DEL TA GROUPS ENGINEERING — ISSUED `° ZONING 5990 STONERTDGE OR. /119 gem, OCCUPANCY " B PLEASANTON. CA"'°6 SHEET INDEX CONTACT: RAYMOND CHID PHONE: (925) 468-01',5 FAX: (925) 468-0335 _PATE: 7/1/99 CCNSTR{1CT%N TYPE: v CURRENT ZONING: COMMERCIAL SURVEYOR: - -SHEET TITLE: TAKE 217 TO 99w:BLVD. GO rOWAW05 FIEAVERTpN. ..IED.AMY 00 Rg17 AT ZONING APPICADON /. re0 GAL LAND SURVEYING DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS LAW ONTO WALL BLVD. GO NORTH,OVER THE OXERPASS: THE FIRST RIGHT TURN 8116 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE AvA&A3LE IS PEAEELE. TURN ONTO PEAFFZt,CONTINUE EAST UN7L YOU COME AP.N.. IS 139 CD 00600 BEAVERTON, OR 97008 To SW 61ST AVENUE. THE VACANT LOT ON THE RIGHT IS THE SITE_ CONTACT: MICHAEL D. RE'INCK TITLE SHEET IOK'AP REOUREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNIMNED AND NOT FOR PHONE. 503-641-0304 FAX: S03-671-0977 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS ANO i IW HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE ANO SHALL IMMEDIATE LT NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR I BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. ■ HEET NUMBER: REVISION:_, DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES T1 2 998288 J a AS 4r.sprint, IV COSMIC �y POWER POLE\ G1 p T� - (�_°`—?�_ 'Z/',7"L ,e , 4683 CHABOT DRNE, SUITE 100 °L 23588— — PLEASANTON, CA 94588 / • � =PROJECT INFORMATION r �r 8 I • / � x15nNC PROPERTY LINE a$ CASH/VACANT LAND lil d ff o.� N1.45' Ilk r TREE ROW P029XC006-C HT-30'kUNDER ��0 11481 SW HALL BLVD. / We TIGARD, OR 97223 B• \ ' PROPOSED 6 MGN CFAN W C 4 /yY` NT-S6' 1• UNK FENCE 1.�,1Y WASHINGTON COUNTY 40.00' =CURRENT ISSUE DATE:1'.6'77' o ' / t 00` i, 1']6'11'I 1'76.11' `� O 2�� " ///// ' ` 7/1/99 - 4� NrnT.3(Yti1NDER -- 0 =ISSUED FOR. '�� G. o ZONING_1,_:: .7.,..)) o =REV.:�ATE:—DESCRIPTION: BY:- `v 0. HT'46 tt5 PROPOSED 45• HIGH PROPOSED 40'x40' LEASE AREA g - 17 .� ��0 0. MONOPOLE O I sitilik 11 TREE ROW ill,PROPOSED YONOPO E HT=20'6NNDER rill 1°d •� 1 - (' - - •' - ~~ • Alp-HI 20• 11110 '�1 TREE ROW - - EXISTING PROPER),LINE A�O w / i•10'YINOER FKISnuG prow LINK FEUCC �� ' 40.00' f-2.DD• j E X.Si1NG P RENT �I �� ----X-7----- - X L ��>>`4�. 1 9�-• // '586.32' j ."- ' �� '-- SirliP16'' L�lASao 0 00;�: v,.yoioioseae.o till' { s � 2 1% — óà• CI I 1RSTING DIRT ROAD ID `� Ni.19' Nr )\f/�• 1�1J} I p' �/ (� N \ =PLANS PREPARED BY: TREE ROW 0 'o "♦♦♦♦\♦♦♦♦♦♦♦\♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦\♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦\ HT.2p'WNDER O EXISTING BUILDING 4 T 19 G 4fE L LAND SURVEYING,INC )110 el \ 0 .,r.19' NT.19' A' �IDKU LAND� � V0 �s. � A� •`, ♦♦ 6116 S.W.WRVS AVE ,1 ♦♦ BEAVERTOR,OR 07006 "'•� ; EXISTING BUILDING TEL Spy-641-0]06 FAX 503-671-p677 110 A♦♦ =CONSULTANT: I ♦♦ Z� OVERALL SITE PLAN .F..1R. 2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 Sff 1.40' ® r.Tr • r w DATE: 4/26/D9 SCE ATTACHED EDT A DRS RE R029xmos-c CASH/VACANT LAND SITE NAME: CASH/VACANT LAND EXISTING DESCRIPTION _ PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6 BASED ON THE TIRE REPORT PRONIOED 114e1 Sw HALL BLVD. --> ----> SANITARY SEWER -► -+ TIGARD,OR 97223 SITE NUMBER: P029XC006-C }— STORM SEWER �_ DRAWN BY: CHK.:-APV.:WASHINGTON COUNTY I I ow*M h 1•.•W tl 4$'26'1lS w0 h WgA•4 d 1IIL7'.XY sA.waft*b S�ADDRESS: 11461 SW HALL BLVD. I 170 NO NXVal TI 5 h.11 d 9. d U.3 RP N'1 Y am.W.b.I.A TIGARD.OR 07223 RATER IdIYH BKH I j WASHINGTON COUNTY ® SANITARY MN4I4OlE ELEVATIONS * —LICENSURE. Iff 679 4.d Wooly. ill.9..d indon NO of 45 RI dG.IN••R..Rai srtl W 771.3 1.4 A16L h.xi dd I.Yr•(ImW1d..)n•IR•w d h M AW1[W1 Oau.d MY OWNER'S NAME: JERRY CASH(RE AGENT OF OWNER) ® STORY STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS 0 (610-63)AM AN.•H....d W Mn.ENEMA N 1Wwd.No he weal 1..11 Al•..tee) OWNER'S ADDRESS: 12525 SW AWN STREET 11.HAW Rim(16.0 )n V Um d h Kd'Wd CAW*9.1.4 Ohm d 1121(IU9 21).d TIGARD. OR 97212 PROPERTY LNE G R.O.W. n..IwW..W b h 4R•.d IN X. _ SURFACE DRAINAGE MIMED CN 0 LENT STANDARD • PROFESSIONAL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(5) 151 36CD 600 LAND RW 0. STREET UIR •___. NET AREA OF UFDERLYNG P - -- ARGEL(s7:21.04 ACRES P2.75 - SPOT ELEVATION �f� NET AREA OF PROJECT AREA 1.600 SOILARE FEET ('-6>2J CONTOUR l'-672� OREGON BRIAN K. HENSON PIS GROUND ELEVATION: 235 FEET 6-v GAS MIN G MAN K.MOON PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION LATITUDE&LONGITUDE BENCHMARK' WASHINGTON COUNTY BENCHMARK 0) MNH AOLE • » a a NO. 401 ELEVATOR 229.69 FEET 0 CATCHBASIN • OP.Fyp-M N BASIS OF ELEVATIONS. NG'AO 29 ❑ 1fir a =SHEET TITLE: I v;r H N A H BASIS OF BEARINGS_ MONUMENTS FOUND AND HELD PER ® VALVE IN 909 Z SURVEY NO. 25.446 WASYINGTON I-0 , FIRE HYDRANT 1--41 sw PFAFFLE ST 1 I COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS THE PROJECT � R��EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE .• ROTES EAtSEYEM LNE TacrHER WITH AR EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS.AS SAID j ,�A'q 9TE� ® CMTrUERE•�O DE AND GROUND ELEVATOR TAKEN AT Ft. SITE SURVEY sat JE w BURIED UTILITY LINE -,AE Jr GENERAL INFORMATION EASEYEM(S)FROM_ TO THE PROJECT AREA #41L 2. COA'TOURS ARE AT ONE (1) FOOT INTERVALS. 21) x• 0 UTILITY POLE • „ TIGARD eb GT- OVERHEAD ITUTY LINE -DC----01- NOTE. M Lonna' Of EXTS11NG UTILITY FACylTES PUS NOT BEEN " ` BUILpNG =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:_ RESEARCHED. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL.COMACT THE RESPECTry[ until"( • CO•PANIES TO OBTAIN NFORL ATON REGARCING EXACT DEPTH OF BURIN- ' og - N.0 HNDN62ONTAL LOCATION Of VTXJIY TRIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7'23 1,S1 . 1 THE SURVEYOR ASSUMES NO RESP'ONSIEILJTY FOR THE DELNEATION OF SUCH IROERGApuND IJTuuTES. NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF BURIED OBJECTS 16119264 ARE NOT 593894 ON MIS RAN. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT(S) VICINITY MAP WALL SITE DATA IE�. LEGEND 2004-II _ — f _ 11Ci' ---- EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD —o. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 100 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 EXRTNG UTILTIY Ku t (POWER/TELCO P.O.C) i - -_--EXIST,C GRAVEL ACCESS =PROJECT INFORMATION:EASE mE pit ; 14%:,,,,:t,.: CASHNACANT LAND `: � ��5 \I - PROPER Y UNE se9 2I 17 C P029XC006-C ----- �r•� 11481 SW HALL BLVD. o‘ .ri t.-/ -------------- ---------- itGARO, OR 97223 r %I WASHINGTON COUNTY 1� 1 ..��/ I a ^! \,...\ I I - ■ EXISTING TREE TO REIMw I =CURRENT ISSUE DATE: \ '*,r_--- i. j 7/1/99 �; ;T 1 1 !HT=4=. =ISSUED FOR I, I '..4.. 1 PROPosto 57 �� -� i ZONING O N I N G PROPpsEp s•-D' WIDE °".,t"" --�`-- Ro1rTNG EASEMENT \ �., REV.:=DATE:—DESCRIPTION: BY:, ,rte _�- .- �T-`F I EX5TNG PAVED ROW 'J ' .— \\T CONTINUNO EXTEND TO `'. \ 11 _ THE YAIN ROW --A,f 1, t•Y' ` P 1'1L1 - \r'>1 , 1 V 'T ~ PROPOSED POMER/TELCO ROUTING I■{{ ;TF� '1 EISENENT UND M1T11IN 12•-0* ACCESS 'Lr / c' 1 ISSUED FOR ' i i 4 _— I b7 !'\ 7/1/99 ZONING (100Z� MT / I t 1rA i ( - ISSUED FOR I — ?�\ 7\1 i_444_4._._- I A 5/11/99 ZONING OD ' �OOP06ED tT-d�E AUlTS =PLANS PREPARED BY: j z� 48> `‘c\.;;%:--4--D1'' ` j141 j tikDELTA YGINFERING. IMC. C • f . 1 1 ID LIQ/STRUN Lucicvm• / - `' � 1'Z1 1 .'.i y - 5 GAL I GLOSS' PRIVET - - -- - '.1 5990 STONER�A DRNE,sun; 119 _ .i . i :' y�.S r PLEASANTON.CA 9456E - • \� ,' T4-1 I _ - j TEL 925-466-DI 15 EA;.925-A68-0355• �- C 11 -PROPOSED 40•X10•LEAS[-AREw- . �•) S. I DOUNDARY__• �.� /� •. A..� I iiiii =CONSULTANT: /� •, ;-�. - \_ ":, :T I — :PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH CHAIN I • �'''±� UNN FENCE r r-•-' I 1 PROPOSED SPRINT PSC �— I — ,�'`� ( 1 EQUIPMENT CABINETS TF "_'\. ''. I milt:-E \\\/�/HT=_0'EtUNDER% • \ ( P PROPOSED CONCRETE P'cs EoopuENT ` ` ` [DRAWN�' �T ' :}`,. '` , �' ' ' \r . - PROPOSED 15'-0' NIGH MONOPOLE I BY: CH K.:—APV.: lr ri 1 .` L - 1� "1{! .I — - '� EXIsnNG CHAIN UNNE_, - MRT 1 F`it- " 1 �`,� I UCEN R .r 11� SU E:iir_—--—- —- ,1! - (• PROPERTY LINE.4r2r5rw 'I' -. • ,-. I 4 •09faw OIM Kw — ,--_ c SHEET TITLE: i & G� rTglr..F ,, SITE PLAN CD �tirrw4wr w u \ ___,.......= NOTE: �I o THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON THE SURVEY. OTHER THAN THE 1 -�-'., g 36'I1 =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:_. LEASE AREA ITSELF, ALL DIMENSIONS, CONTOURS, ETC. ON THIS - DRAWING ARE SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION BY THE SURVEYOR. + -�`''.T' A -1 i1� ! SITE PLAN 2 I1O1"" OMOW . if W 996288 • movosco PowER/TELCO •- �" r _ . ',.I L4 PROPOSED 1r-0' WE ACCESS r U1op1p10UND ROVING °- ... t _ EASEIGR.SEE 1/A1 FOR CONTINUATION b - 1"r-0' WIDE ACCESS 1 11!!1'1 h - NlI INI , — /n a 1;—; 8 PROPOSED SaTOIL rASO+rNr s;I 1 ;` 1 — 'lllld ! 'll�!! Ir G z TEA•44 I PER1 S a �1 1 ' 1 ;=?C; - r \'': VEIi. v fri :"\ r z ! -' ;. :' 7 9i •1 SECTORS 70TA1J f ) ,N ly a j T/ l f, 3' rl y. I I 1111"' 1 9 J IrG ly �. it, stew SUITE 1 R'-fr a a•1'1,1,`''•7.1 .' . 1 rern -• PROPOSED(2)r-RrX6•-0. . 611. 1 h. R 1 I, '� / 1 r 4.'.r • I PLEA CHABOi DRIVE, SUITE 100 10--(f OWN LRNX ACCESS GATE a + i� tt - - T I I1 ` - T a-=€ .i1:1if- I ,-;_i�/1r;/1•� ail 2 //,, - _ ---"4')f-,:.,. - 5 CAL GLOSSY PRIVET PL"cASANTON, CA 94588 �(/ _ '.� �`'�' X 1,e X`It:. C•-1 x I+_ - 'Y Lt' I,L I+ -PROJECT INFORMATION: CASFWACANT LAND igrii& PROPOSED 45'-7 NON ! X • ■ �/ RAONIOT cD \' T/e !1!?3i 3i ":;_141,..'1.‘-' r029XC006-C \ 4 /:" PROPOSED 200A I I , I.may!.1�►�„�� , PROPOSED►PC CARNET 11481 SW HALL BLVD. R y .-7�J k - . TIGARO, OR 97223 IW �M; �4 `\ _=. g\ zp X E ` - _ i ``ia� WASHINGTON COUNTY rE" tP _ a / z \ Y �� PROPOSED EMERGENCY >i � -`� t .,T CURRENT ISSUE DATE: \� GENERATOR RECCPTAa.E * �_ -� - --, --•-- ,,-. ' PMR 1.-- u I I. PwR! 'f` R '7.-.- 7 '�I 99 ` : / PROPOSED CPS ANTENNA X ■L__ __J >< '7/1541-----4.6 k ..�/ • PROP05ED SPRINT P�$ / / b : r - EDWPYENT GaNETS I I =y 1a �(:'_ -ISSUED FOR: PROPOSED LIGN/T FIXTURE X FOR SERVICE LIGHTING t - -+-• -2h4 ZONING ANTENNA '� �� -"'- ® \ Y - •I -1±..i ) FOR SPRINT PGS EowwENT -REV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY:- �uE�, Oft # i I 7m(.ff)�-- PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD I�LAYOUT NDR1N ,�RII NMDM. t r r \ $ - X .. _ ( : �� CABINETS l X l, a �` '/ ‘714111111111r7;70,1 ,:„,,,M,•�y�r �'/ f`•' PROPOSED 6•-7 NON Ti4A$'2,;>C": ///' • FENCE \ \' I�vi � . I _ � y PROSep. ,6� !) X ' PROPOSED SPRINT PCS ANTENw b i � � 611." (J PER SECTOR. 2 IHTAL. 1 FUTURE 1 7 - I ■r�'. (. •3 SECTORS TOTAL) `'5\ �\ f --t,_ 1...�' X =:! EXTSTNG CIWN LINX FENCE �^,` ISSUED FOR ,�-" �'y-� _ `,I ' X _ I:\ �,- N� (�\ 7/1/99 ZONING (100%) MT I 0 I I `__l;G I ISSUED FOR - - 1 I - I ll/i L, r_1 5/11/99 ZONING 00 • ° �'T. I z f! i-. '1 \y,:'•1^ a .d• -PLANS PREPARED BY: X .4,r1171;'fIN`IRO 01P% W =ff DELTA GROUPS f ., , 8 Q ,-- _' -e — = -_.�� E��H M�Inc. J —i_,1 �/_ /R 1 — — _ ..47----, x={1 Y w 0 c CONIRIutNG ENdMH#i /J o ) 1� 1'46.27' STONERIpGE pRfy2:,Std Ito PLEASANTON.CA D4510 1r-T trT —11•-0•— 1'36'11' .• '^'_ %• `. 7 T .-— �—1Y• `— °� - - - L 925-a66-0175 FAX 925-466-0.755 40•-o- LEASE AREA BooNDAl1 - — . __ =CONSULTANT: Ra UNUSED , ; - EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN - I.6,,m l . ® 1 PROPOSED 2004 10•-r (Out TO OUT or CONCRETE SLAB) METER BASE i•-g 2•-7- _ K v 2•-r c 2•-r I'-0' PROPOSED in.-- � _ �'4'RAT� ELEC. 7ELC0 �i■ I b' `��.QL [DRAWN BY: CHK.:=APV.: RECEPTACLE ■ -1 T , + LI MRT 1 1,. r / 1 1 1 I LICENSURE: y I I I I PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PPC • £ I. 5 •I M I N c b SLAB(11•-Ofa10'-r) I--I _ J_-L J PROPOSED CPS 1"V ANTENNA I '.1• 1\1� o •;� - ' ,71\ 11- _ PROPOSED LKilf / • r✓` "' -' -IE--- FIXTURE FOR G l 1�� U II b' ^-•Ft IA � _ �-- =SHEET TITLE:•I sn' II �' II nu I 6 — PROPOSED PNE�M i v.--,•.7 ( 7 I n n 1 _ caNES N 1 x. O EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN • -+- -+- "�-� — �- ...«'�' j. +"i'�'� KEY PLAN •�. •I. .11. II. .I ea — —'_ Wit"—="":'. >"" EQUIPMENT LAYOUT `V • �_ N ANTENNA LAYOUT•— — ti 9 / ' ��11''p d r -SHEET NUMBER: REVISION,_ I1'-7 •2'-r 2t 27 2Y 1•- 7 r t 1 • UNUSED WA" - EQUIPMENT LAYOUT om ,® .2 KEY PLAN „"�'„ �'D"`k 2 NcM� I • T 9911288 . if-. ■ *int Q b_ L ! 11t ` �.}ti k=_ �n� 4683 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 100 7 S A 4-\ PLEASANTON. CA 94588 ', 7 �/ 'TL =PROJECT INFORMATION W ik?AZIYUTN o Y�` ..._ :-_.� + _ ' .tl'ii3:i[. '` CASH/VACANT LAND SECTOR I t - • A.�..: ,i y AZIUUTH Q �/ 11 VX7> ;•/li. ,. `-L.' •�,, SECTOR I �•�: lib ros9xcoo6-c S�,,M�, �c, ,� ��1 ` �� 1,481 SW HALL BLVD. �� :'(� 7 �` �\ WASHINGTON COUNTY \S b' \ i;g (=CURRENT ISSUE DATE:1/4‘', zip 7/1/99 =ISSUED FOR: WORM,L TO11T AffetelA uraTT AH,E- EGO_ w,..PI,LAYOUT ZONING =REV.:=DATE:=DESCRIPTION: BY:= I TOP of OONOPO[E TOP OF ANTENNA I 1 PROPOSED SPRINT PCs ANTENNA cEHTr NE „� „ ' '� PROPOSED SPRINT PCS l Q SSUED FOR jiil PROPOSE(3 PER SECTOR. (,, ` J 2 �1P1. 1 FIGURE „ , •� Z AMT• CIA(S p�SECTOR • 1 Z 7/1 99 ZONING 10034 MT • 3 sEGTORS TOTAL) x INITIAL. 1 FUTURE t I //�� / SSUED FOR ) • 3 SECTORS TD AL) L U 5/11/99 ZONING 00 PROPOSED Pas AWITHAM —PLANS PREPARED BY: 10 LICUSTRW LUCIDVO D 45'-d HIDH 5 GAL PRNPT PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE DELTA GROUPS MONOPOLE CXK1elP 1tQS FOR XRNCE UGHTINC PROPOSED 45'-0• NIGH 10 � EXISTING TREES MONOPOLE ENGINEERING. INC. b \\ TO RD/NH (BEVONO) PCS I. E N• T CRAB IETS N b ! F - .ate*,� v d^ a .w v ? n ..�� c• �► .''` .r '�' e.. .,. ,+t• <. AN t.. +.x v+L+!'A1• POSE wx REEISTMG TREE TO sT IeCA 9 5M SUITE 110 G.HAJN at •. b �„ dF ��. ., •. 925-4158-0115 FAX 925-460-0.355 , , -. -, a t Yf e so .T ar +3 RR 3 v a At' :...:• _ �.A- : •_ -T."M;!!P -_-„ `'e +a.Y-•A 'A1E" ABi`R :�=CONSULTANT:•'<, . . .: .4� a « - `X:.. � •tom ,; 41La Xc q,-.. y,, rt• '\, • :, ;.. ,ii . ,' lain II ...lt• L •,.... .:. ....-... .._ , . . , • , • . .....„,..7,›,: _.. NOSH DUDE PROPOSED(2 S-S d G-d BY: CHK.:=APV,: [DRAWN URT I 1/7,i•l� WEST ELEVATION 'G" ® 7 SOUTH ELEVATION ""` ® eGLe —LICENSURE ^�� . 1•-� a 15 EAST ELEVATION ,�. ® I 3 NORTH ELEVATION WO'' ® i 1 PROPOSED 200A YET[R BASE / PROPOSED CPS / PROPOSED CPS PROPOSED CPS ANTENNA \ OPOSED 20M ANTENNA ANTENNA PROPOSED EOERGERLC� PROPOSED CPS PROPOSED UGFT PROPOSED UGHT FIXTURE GENERATOR RECEPTECLE • ANTENNA PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE 1 FIXTURE FOR FOR SERVICE LIGHTING FOR SERV CE LXyrtNG r SERVICE E UGIFTIHG • PROPOSED PPC — CABINET PROPOSED MC CANES PROPOSED PwR . •(�' Z� PROPOSED P•R CA°1SE ForoRE 1 / c�CABINETS.TMP. CABINET(BEYOND) \ ��:i i ■ IQ PROPOSED PRC - b ( =SHEET TITLE : CABINET I I b ELEVATIONS Ilpil PROPOSED STEEL • • __ _____, EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS SKID e . , .•. •"a L__ 1— I II il�� _� ` GoRKREtP sL� 1 — 8 �� PROPOSED sTEEI l I ,D =SHEET NUMBER. REVISION:_ �� PROPOSED CONCRETE / mj— —� coPiONCRPOETE°sue 1 WEST EQUIP. ELEV. , V e® 8 SOUTH EQUIP. ELEV. ,® 6 4 EAST EQUIP. ELEV. "c.-- -... ® 2 URA' 0 I. 4 NORTH EQUIP. ELEV. ulna. r 2 998288 ilr II . . . li 8 o a_ i Z N :"clbt W S1 u ?i . t, i ca.,:s Lc) c.7) ilE 21 q ..,-0 g 1 0 11[ 11 II' IIII & g- > !d 8, ,>. 1 r ppm Z � 3 ,�� o - ''. .. m<; - O Y1 W 3 4 7 W Sv F W a ,2�Ci rc Z W rY O _ ' 3 N D 3 W W {.�j N a p 9 O p 3 UU 2 I_a: Y' jl' �f - - - II I� it-1 � _1 ICC.] A, T lwa-'_ ......, ' �� () `/\� U S'� �� `� (7 l �� 1,��Lam , '+ ° -'49- ° to �( o � v , off'�`� o �- " `� :. ,, pr . mil' \�. ) 1. �) Ji trx ` '$,? �. R c , v v u (� a )r < 4 r�u ( �, S J _ �r i L & r_ V 1 11 1y rJ , v ti rJ t. rJ �� rJ rye_`�i o C ) 7 ' J G OJ 1\ O 0_, i O o _, \ I �, 1 n �^.) �C k n ll4 � 1 _ n cz "mil - �� ' n I iik_? Crio (. no , o �; f , n�1 1 „._.:L... . C� I i� C ., l_ 1 ' - n _ 1 •_ •1 O_ 1 n I i.r 1, - ' 4 4 ' • -, , - . - . s 4 4 a a . I A$1‘,/)(1. "1/412 v ' qyk..1* ' ' • ' ' ' ' ' 4 ' -' ' 1 -771,-/.4)1.4-:= ge_ $8,00 ,R. pop, .nom . - _ pU ® D' .7..°° - ,-�,�a"`°$ U° ” o f 147.4,7.-°8 ° °t' _ . - - - • [ ° ' rr• a I L a A $# f Y ,e , b g 5 , f A - I I = , o p . 1 § i 1\m i - •� • / Ill N s i . ► � _. 6 > 4 L in Y T r\ °°,-1.o M I ' I/ "11 I P":7 '4;:4'01:4 ''''.it, s oy I (° p m°Op N %, \ C7. 5`s_. —s— —s .__.s- ._C_ J.... —s-. ... s I$—,C gr �� , °°R�°fL�^ k9�. S Vv.. �i ` _ >14_ I• a p S..J J 1 ink s ` X11 ^ ��( O`L 0 �� o f, n�((�, ��r1 " e(� S y -n IC',J571�/� r' Z .c .-,0,C� rJ t ° .��/�t. o� a 7'��°.'r�L (iz �� c- Q.Y c -' GC--"T-s.. ,d2.°. y c;,..,, 1� 62 0 m° 03 11 Ili xxl gliOill i3iiMi I f a Y� xy Ex `s° 4 4 a u v. PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES o E000 Community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six 161 Months) S hoping ABetterCon`munity NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP MTG.DATE Lt( / 1 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: w, S APPLICANT: Pcs:, AGENT: Phone: CL2. — I Lc Phone: [ l c-(S1 �JJ— \C3c),S PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: &C&D TAX MAP(Sl/LOT#(5I: S L NECESSARY APPLICATION(SI: .. 1 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: k (i( Cn.lv�Zc�SS �re� cam( c ■ J ActT Sc'[-ca - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: M ak . 10 ∎cc L- ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C.I.T.AREA -- FACILITATOR: PHONE: (503] ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6fan sq. ft. Average lot width: 951 ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner c5. ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 5% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %. [Refer to Code Section 18.c2C. 21 ceT S . 'r5'1 (D'"Tc18 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through-the-min-or la • n process. Lots created p's part of a partition must have a minimum-of-15 feet of frontage or have a nimum 15-foot wideaccess easement. The DEPT OF ALL LOTS S. A NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less .2 ' •- -s the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS • STREETS: feet from the centerline of BEST - feet from • LOW INTE TY ZONES: feet along the sitr's __boundary. Z– LAG Le . i- i i - i - - = [Refer to Code Chapter 18.130] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS _ BUI DING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings loc Ina r--- -7elittefkal zone may be built to a heigh of 75 feet provided that: A m imum building floor area t e area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual]-building setb I I be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and - The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.] PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking .HOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking .HOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MARE THAN 40°. of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKI G STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • St dard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. - Co pact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as pa -mad parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscape meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer ction 18.765.040] Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATEL LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum lumber of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensis s, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon req est. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and a appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Mi imum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: ■ [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential AppllcaUon/Planning Mtoe Satin WALKWAY REQ REMENTS WAL AYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GRO D FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and indu rial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide cony nient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial com lexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.105.0301 iOADING AR REQUIREMENTS Eve COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL B ! •• )(GSS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provid:. with a loading space. e space size and location all be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 CLEAR VISION AREA \, The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BUFFERING AND SCREENING 46\S I � Q\Vas> CY 7(13 t °- G:D In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITR REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: . LANDSCAPING — • ( L� ��-Ic 4 L.&V� STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FO ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential application/Planning Division Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18380) SENSITIVE Th- C•de provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEV OPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL D' A AGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UN:TABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- apflication conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely id ntify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas --tine the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the •evelopment application. hapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands a -as. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. efer to Code Chapter 18.1151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the re ►Jirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY IUSAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AR- S shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect t e water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIM i M OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, -xcept where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of e corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the ve•-tated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 1 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetate• corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, tv e average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, constructs a n activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, o other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided .y the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: ➢ A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, : i GHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-tesfdeitlal Appllcatloo/Manlog IMsisa Section Y WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet w. e approval of the Agency or City. Locati• ' of V: setated Corridor: IN AIRY RES DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separat: ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tr..ct, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. IR r er tolls,0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOUR¢ES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Com ehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of si nificant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local WetL nds Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while est-blishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit de elopment in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood sto age capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fis and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water re •urce areas. Saf- Harbor: The , ' OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 ' -tural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 2 . ese provisions -:-. - that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, w" . h is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STRE,MS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic f-et per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CRE:K, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" a cording to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Cree Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tu.latin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE ft AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). - The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. r The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBAC IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. - ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAM (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer'is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.197.030] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Bcsidential Application/Planning!Maslen Section Riparian Setback Reductions The ID(RECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY AJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better Prot:ction for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enh.ncement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eli.i u ilit for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO : ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determ' ation must be based on the Veget tudy required by Section 18.797.050 that demonst ztes all of the following: • Native p . - - - currently cover less than 80% of th on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the n-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian set ck area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provision of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodpla n; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 2 %. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.100) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS — LL `"Q` csa.( ' A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance • with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.1] NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32] CODE CHAPTERS /18.520 18.330 ✓ 18.390 _ 18.715 _ 18.765 _ 18.795 18.350 18.420 18.530 _ 18.730 _ 18.775 _ 18.797 ,/ 18.360 _ 18.430 _ 18.620 18.745 _ 18.780 _ 18.800 18.370 _ 18.510 _ 18.705 _ 18.755 _ 18.790 1 c� 71 8 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. e study s all address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, t• •rainage system, th- •arks system, the water system, the s:wer system and the noise impact • the development. For ea public facility system and type of imp:ct, the study shall propose provements necessary to meet 'ty standards, and to minimize the impact of the developmen •n the public at large, public facilities stems, and affected private propert users. In situation: here the Community Development Code r-tuires the dedication of real property i - _ - - applicant shall either specifically concur with the • -dication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedi :tion requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Sesldentlal llppllcatloa/Plannlag Ilulsieo Satin NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) • SUBDIVISIO LAT NAME RESERVATION PRIG TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applic nt's are required to complete and file a subd.' in plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order— obtain approval c ervation for any subdivision name. Applica 'ons will not be accepted as complete until the Cit eceives the faxed confirmation of approval om the Cou f the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: ,s- sk-A0•704L-DS `-a,c wtxe.Csus z.srJo a:smMfaG -�nes; . sc-c Wt. -�a./( \—k\o cL 64 a'. s c.,X ) e e -k-ct,- A ` w coo ' �- PCu_ Arc s () � s . �o f c,/i f 1p ) Ikrt i (rnv,/w/pr CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Appllcatfon Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Madq Division Section PROCEDURE j Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications • submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard -\ R. js cc . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of ood site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: \ (k CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4111 FAX: 503 684-1291 E-MAIL: staf s first name)@ci.tigard.or.us is\cu rpin\masters\revis ed\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Sprint I'urtl:uul Field Operations Sprint PCS '1) a■\ \l„hawk 'ILalatin. (Ilt 07062 Mai kW!) ORT1 A;10101 nice 503 612 IOW Fax iO3 612 1135 • April 21, 1999 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Co-location evaluation Dear Mr. Roberts: Sprint PCS is proposing to construct a 45' monopole tower for the purpose of wireless communications. The proposed site is located at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street in the City of Tigard, and has a Commercial Professional (CP) zoning designation. The existing AT&T monopole to the west of the proposed site was identified for the purpose of co-location. However, the AT&T monopole faces the Highway 217 corridor. Co-location onto the monopole would not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, which are to provide service to 99W from the 1-5 intersection to Main Street. Because co-location onto this tower does not meet Sprint's coverage objectives, Sprint proposes to construct a 45' monopole tower at 8060 SW Pfaffle Street. It is crucial for Sprint to provide the adequate coverage in this part of the City of Tigard in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license obligations. Sincerely, /141 /61-f Steve Kartz Senior RF Engineer for Sprint PCS J/18/1999 16:05 503639118. TIGARD VET HOSPITAL PAGE 05 V'CS 8. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability as follows: (a) upon thirty (30) days' written notice by Landlord for failure to cure a material default for payment of amounts due under this Lease within that thirty (30)-day period; (b) upon thirty (30) days' written notice by either party if the other party defaults and fails to cure or commence curing such default within that thirty (30)- day period, or such longer period as may be required to diligently complete a cure commenced within that thirty (30)-day period; (c) upon ninety (90) days' written notice by Tenant, if it is unable to obtain, maintain, or otherwise forfeits or cancels any license, permit or Governmental Approval necessary to the installation and/or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant's business; (d) upon ninety (90) days' written notice by Tenant if the Property, Building or the Antenna Facilities are or become unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering specifications for its Antenna Facilities or the communications system to which the Antenna Facilities belong; (c) immediately upon written notice if the Premises or the Antenna Facilities are destroyed or damaged so as in Tenant's reasonable judgment to substantially and adversely affect the effective use of the Antenna Facilities. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction, and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant; (f) at the time title of the Property transfers to a condemning authority, pursuant to a taking of all or a portion of the Property sufficient in Tenant's determination to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant's use. Landlord and Tenant shall each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards with respect to such taking. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power, shall be treated as a taking by condemnation. (g) by landlord, after expiration of the Year Seven (7) by giving at least twelve (12) months' written notice to Tenant. 9. Taxes. Tenant shall pay any personal property taxes assessed on, or any portion of such taxes attributable to, the Antenna Facilities. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes and all other fees and assessments attributable to the Property. In the event that Landlord fails to pay said real property taxes, then Tenant shall have the right to pay said taxes and deduct them from Rent amounts due under this agreement. PO-1373-B.SLO 5 -777 Pyre-Q s CD Me n11999 s AA Meetings g ................. T W 123 >, 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 12 3 14 15 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 2303.:„....7,24 :'< €€.,25 26 27 28 29 30 April rit 22 19 99 Y 8:00 8:30 � :00 R K Maur , 957=1 0(# .: 1I 1'E;::I ::;; sprint monoole ' ::.;.:,:>;;;;.. . ...:.::... ::: .: .:.::....: 9:30 ..„.>:»: :. 10:00 10:30 :t *o4 8. ,11.00 :r st► 11:30 iiiiiiiKeig#0.4:::::::::::::„............. 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 3:21 PM Tuesday,April 13,1999 . . 1 Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS 7770 SW Mohawk Tualatin, OR 97062 Mailstop ORTUAA0101 Voice 503 612 1000 April 8, 1999 Fax 503 612 1135 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Pre-application Conference request for Sprint PCS Dear Mr. Roberts: On behalf of Sprint PCS,we are submitting the attached Pre-application Conference materials for a wireless communications facility located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard. The exact tax parcel number for the site is 1S136CD-00600, and the property is owned by the Alex Finke Trust. Please find attached the supporting information for a Pre-application Conference in the City of Tigard: • Project Description • Affidavit of Mailing • Tax Parcel Map • Zoning Map for proposed site • Topographic Map • Site and Elevation Plan • Filing Fee: $240.00 filing fee for a Pre-application Conference. A check for is attached. We understand that the Pre-application Conference will be scheduled in approximately two weeks from today. We hope the attached information will allow staff to prepare comments for the meeting. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact me at (503)957-1005. Sincerely, - Ry n K. Young Project Manager PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sprint PCS is in the process of improving its Personal Communications System (PCS) network in the Portland Metropolitan region. To provide improved wireless communication service to the area along Highway 99 and Highway 217, Sprint proposes to include a new site located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard. The property is zoned Commercial Professional (CP) and has a Commercial comprehensive plan designation. The proposed Sprint facility would be located within an approximate 1,600 square foot lease area. A six-foot high chain link fence topped with three strands of barbed wire would surround the facility. Sprint proposes to construct an 80' monopole tower to provide wireless communication services. A three-sector panel antenna mount would be attached near the top of the monopole. At the base of the tower, Sprint would place a concrete pad for its ground equipment. On the concrete pad would stand Sprint's accessory equipment cabinets,which are the size of two small refrigerators. Sprint's Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna would also be located on the equipment pad. The GPS antenna would be operational, and approximately 4"high x 8" long x 4"wide. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non-interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Sprint's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Approximately one visit per month is required by a Sprint technician for routine maintenance once the site is constructed. ATTESTATION State of Oregon County of Washington I certify that the attached four (4) pages are true and correct copies of documents that were sent to the addressees by U.S. Mail on April 6, 1999, by Ryan Young, Project Manager for SDS Wireless on behalf of Sprint PCS. C . % z-e-t,crnJ Dated: GZt Q, /.2./ e 999 . OFFICIAL SEAL SUSAN C.BROWN NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0.320354 Notary Public - State of Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.3,2003 My commission expires: _2 -3 -..26o3 Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS Y _--O 1{ohay.‘k Tualatin. OR ')-r)1,2 \Iailstop aR'1'I \M.!) \nice `Q3 612. ;1)01) Ia !1;i April 6, 1999 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 601 Portland, OR 97223 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. Peterson: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at (503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, u(AAP-) Ryan K. Young Project Manager 'Hat Sprint PCS" Portland MTA 121 PB8572998 770 SW%lint.Illdg.F Z 0 Tualatin.rlrtgnn 9'062 5351. 1 00 �3.7 APR 06 99 llaiIstor IIwn.mon 2362 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97062 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 mint Sprint PCS" Portland MTA 1 8 9 P B 8 5 7 2 9 9 8 1i10SW Mohawk Bldg.F 5301 f 00 .330 APR 06 99 Tualatin.Oregon 91062 �lailstop:OIRTI MI)101 2364 MAILED FROM TUALATIN oR 97062 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenberg Road Suite 601 Portland OR 97223 t_ rile• • .. �R�YT d' • c��j. Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ---Q SU \1oha k Tualatin. OR 9-01, \laiIstup i)RTl.\.u)1U1 quite ;0; (712 IU00 F:ix -DiUI.. 1iii April 5, 1999 Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW Fourth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. Swensen: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at(503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, .1(criA4 Ryan K. Young Project Manager =tiY 4� ,C r-,' „......,.:, , ..1,_, .,• ,..„,. . ,. -„,„,, r . ••,,,..,„.. ._ . .....• ,,_ . ..,. . ,..,,,,-„_ .. .....•. „. ... ,,.,;. Sprint Sprint PCS" �.0.- ' „ Portland MTA 1 4 6 nD '• P88572 , 7770 SW Mohawk.Bldg.F 5371 S 00 .3 3 0 APR 06 Tualatin,Oregon 9701)2 2358 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 9 7 l Mailsiop:I INTIIAA0101 Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW 4th Ave Portland, OR 97201 Sprint Sprint PCS' q, * * * god Via':�e Portland MTA '141 g fit► P 8 770 SW Mohawk.Rklg.F' 5351 S 00 _330 APR 06 Tualatin,Iltrgon y'llh! 2360 WAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97 Maiblop:URTt AA010I Brian Cook Voicestream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street Suite 530 • Portland OR 97232 Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ---o J\1 \Ioh mk T'_alatin. OR 9-01)2 r.: ti p ORD ‘..\0101 ce co; I)L 11)00 . ;Oi bl_' liii April 6, 1999 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. McDonald: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at (503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, V.-Lk Ryan K. Young Project Manager )rent Sprint PCS" mss°�y qtr Portland MTA 1 2 1 P B 8 5 7 2 9 9 8 7 70 SW'Mohawk.7062 F 5 3 5 1. 1 UU _3 3 0 APR 06 99 Tnalallll,On�;on 97062 2 3 6 2 RAILED FROM TUALATtN OR 97062 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 print Sprint PCS' cf.L9. * * * a __ Portland Moha 189 PB8572998 '%r0 tin Mohawk.70(2F 5301 $ 00 330 APR 06 99 Tualatin.(non 97062 • Mailstop:()RTIIAM010l 2364 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97062 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenberg Road Suite 601 Portland OR 97223 J V . .T c .vw x # .T 7747' • • a• —' Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS 0 j11 \lnh:n%k Tualatin. OR 9-Oh_ 1l;ulstop IIRTC,1.10lo; ■nice ^0)_: n1 1000 Fa% iO3 of Ili; April 5, 1999 Brian Cook VoiceStream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97232 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Brian: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard(see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at (503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ia•■ n K. Young Project Manager • Th x • Yl.p�. rt�f}rs • Sprint Sprint PCS" .. * * * w° ,• - y Portland MIA 1 4 6 _= 77711 SW Mohawk,Bldg.F P B 8 5 Tualatin.Ut i 97062 5 3 7 1 $ 00 . 3 3 0 APR 0 Jtadxhgr.UN111AAU101 2 3 5 8 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR t Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW 4th Ave Portland, OR 97201 Sprint Sprint PCS" �<P * * * (/ Portland M1'A � 770 SW Mohawk.Bldg.F 1 4 1 ' P 8 8 5 7 Tualatin,ongnn 971x,! 5351 $ 00 .330 APR 0 1lallakpr mini OIOI 2 3 6 0 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 9 Brian Cook Voicestream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street Suite 530 Portland OR 97232 '\--'.i. \ ,.4'.c..) s. . .. ... 1 . . , , ... mil . . aft \ •. \ I ' • • 7.5-"------. I ct. 1 ! t. .jam _r..._ -� + .., t ,,. _ . • • 1 I. i +ww i �j 'I "! • __� i• .... X51 ' vS,M1 i. .. ! . `Li trr 1 1 1,'- 17-1-1?. ._ �€ `-1 w�_t�x� 1 1 �+ . . • ——3,N,s‘,\,. ,I—.4 Cleti • o..�- t 9:..*. - r .I F‘�\%� j r 2..._:4.: i �/'�i1 t 1' t:. ,� ii N I i f 1 1 r I �_ 1—:_4 `• 13 1 t L jr I ." 1 !1 %' 1 _1 t ,`114r1 1:-- 1.•l,_. !!i. i . 111. 4.4011113110 gm - k•• _ _I 1_ v. t is t T_ -- 'Is■1 TO. -1- --I L , -1-- .i./i J t r _-- aigIN w ■ W CK ( 1 t , , ...- . ___ __ __. / , i - I 's- -.... ,.... ,,- - ,...,,> .......:,1„ ; W I ... ‘7 j /� to, I ....0..'........ ....swot......, oi...\ I / j ` I-` . . '00./41'° �Vr`\ _ i L - t II 0 41. .1%it: ' . • :Ili , .14. C\I el I . I, 1 9 / 1 1, N. .__.,,,x1.......... • ".7,•iio; . .....-.....•_..i......1,_1 ._ , „, "limn. \\. , .•(\-1 --ci`. IRO ...-1. •-Till.I .L--. Sent By DEL 3ROUPS ; 192546F 5; Apr-8-99 9:24AM; Page 3/3 TA GROUPS ; 19254880355; Apr-8-99 9:23AM; Page 2/3 • ••o•u.m..e Mt.Mo • �r • •ifJ rat I.w.. 1 wwuc -- , T ,� • • GT n'OA.ATp1! CAW VACANT LAND MI •.r D 4,-,IT:11111..fit ,y� ' 11481 SR HALL Kw. ,11 `i "• as x 1riARD.OR 97723 MOOG N;auo■.ate i.i , .. �,.. ' /! . I� +. �` s ,�, ..�-�.,1 •_ ,. -.T cowry• w►.».v. ...L � 1< ��/ 1'► � � . iv,. ,/ I, " •' .r 4 e..•• ( .f I' ;j-.4_,-„,�' 4/7/99 7/g g■ •.o•nm DO•'-o1'.c _� y, �� ti • i /J 4' ► . -. FOR caw uu.ocel.M.4 �� I �' %"'�' -_~4. 1 ■, I '� ft" J 1 ' ` y _. -�- `-s� � � _ - EXHIBIT "8"t.. POPO=COS Amor �wu.vo>F/•�i cam Jam[ -_ I� /. _— - "��•-'T $t$#, .:�1TE 0►i: --�,� �._ -.1 'f ---. tea F- _ — - sea* - 4683 CHABOT DRNE, SUITE 100 __-_ - -- BC PLEASANTON, CA 94588 =PROJECT INFORMATION: CASH/VACANT MND EXISTING POWER/TELCO POLE P029XC006 / ' 11481 SW HALL BLVD. / T J 71GARD, OR 97223 /�T / WASHINGTON COUNTY // //r.,/ SW HALL BLVD. -CURRENT ISSUE DATE: z f//,T< / 4/7/99 U FLL{--�!/�/ // EXISTING POWER POLE .L . ( �� (---"'-2'n" —ISSUED FOR: Y / . �/\�y, EXHIBIT "B„ Cr ' °) c) ( ebb�,„ a °°4a;�. Y y Of' f � _ Ir1 O v V O 17r lQ i y' A 4 y y J Cj Q - EV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY- /� E✓T / I x °.:1,`.°�4ti° � p� °C� Cr---_, \J U 4( cl 3E-_/ I YC k ° e.� 4' y y 4 C2- ( . .Y 4 .. 0qy a o. (� ® '� , ` Lit I l NdE 4.Id6 UIQ 4 R 1.FJ °�,Qd 4®yam is 4, V J• y, --.< ( �° l j f�� , ' t I 4 W •V Gbl uT[f ooE 'T§�A d.fr_ y y y ` 46 'a w C•.1 _ O• x ` ' JE�' p I , 4, 4, y y r�°9;0 0 4,U Y y 4• •,1'. 'f4 a / 4I V�j` I ' X,__r y y y y y y y 4' y y y 4 W/ / e f I. ( t W W W 4 W 4' W 4• 4' y y 4 y y 4• O OC OO U 0 Y�q,all•9/;4) t ♦ CI. W 'V 4, 4, W .L L 4 y 4• 4' 4- 4 1 p , �-) OG ' C A ��0f 7 111 E I W 4, y 4, 4. y 4. y �(0 p`` ; •) `�'^' N T ]vl C' (-I ExlsnNC SHRUBBERY , Q tr�� o3 /� ISSUED FOR B J 1 y y 4 y y L /7\ 4/7/99 EXHIBIT "8" OD 0 k E/T . W y •Y 4, y 4, .-.1 -PllwS PREDPARED 8A Y:r 1 EXISTING vAvED ROAD 0 APPROX. 5/L i► o Y 4 5'-0 2 YOE L y W V y V • `ate , a+ 1 4 y y y y I o ENEGILTNE E RGROUPS t PROPOSED UNDERGROUND vaER/TEico ----9\r d � I . I y ,1, ROUTING N A 5'-0"WIDE UTRITI'EASEMENT ,Y 4 4• 4• v! I I MINIUM V; Y y 4' y y W 0 /f O � OQ t� C ' I OG G '5990 STONEROcGE Dr8 SINT 119 V D ,. I PROPOSED(2)6'-0•x6'--0•CRAW Y -v y y y y p. `J V n1� / UNW ACCESS GATES ///�� CA /L - •p °(`0k I� E� 4' t i L 4, W 4 W 4, 'I 1 1 �0 TEL 921-468-0113 FAx 92S-468-0353 U i 1 �v 1 4, 4, . . . •V 4' 4' 4- y y ) L_P O^ —CONSULTANT: ^�• a 1�� b 11 E� Y 4' PROPOSED CPS ANIFNNA 4• W 4. 4' 4• •V ( , j D l I � ��, CJ 4' V • PROPOSED 40•x0' LFASE AREA + 4, •, O Q G itt- • ,fjA A • te I R •.A, ° «4f D •,,,*( E/ Y • W PROPOSED SPRINT PCS EJUIPMENT L W y y 4, W 20 0 ^4J- L I W 4' V , ON CONCRETE SLAB Y W 4• y y W tT _▪ r m.•IYa t Y 4 I Y 4• 4• •V 4, .V 4' v ,,.r.a 4 _ PROPOSED 6'-0•NIGH CevW ldnlc< f'�•� •�SL E/T _ 1 -Y •Y y y 4- �V C CDC) -'Ft° ow FENCE O O �7 [DRAWN BY: CHK MRT �� A SUBJECT TO CONnRHATCN BY r or', d NX I Y 4, 4- 4' 4, W ``-�' Id -d 4° ` PROPOSED SPRINT PCS AH!TENM SURVEYOR.THIS EXHIBIT B Y p(-1 S. ASSUMES 7Ia5 LN[5 THE i O -� II E O I (3 PER SECTOR, 3 SECTOR TOTAL) C-----0 ) -LICENSURE: ' PROPERTY LINE 'oBFJ b D¢ \ I'x I- x 4 4, Y y 4, 4• V 1 p �} "fir o°oL"E66 ° II b - PROPOSED 45'-0•HIGH;TEFL MONOPOLE Y 4, y 4, 4•�V �� Off` 8. K LATER THE SURVEYOR CONFx71E5 THAT ° IIICCC"'ttl ] THE HAND OF THIS HEN BELONGS TO I X W 4, y y 4, y \ .` da C�'{T,� -4 o THE SAME ECNER,HETH sP00 • •O s II �� ' 11 .ft s J___//l.l!'.J PCS WY DECIDE METIER OR �J y 4• 4, E%K71Nf S'-0•t MGI Cl//1 LM( 4, 4• J-'� NOT To HAVE THESE Rawl(a).NC D. k Aa '?o XI FENCE _ AS THE ACCESS EASEMENT. THEREBY _�� o� a �/ p SAVING SOUS CONSTRUCTION COSTS D - O II JI 4, 4' Y . v -.lY Y L 1 ^ `"" X—X X—X v+-`-• .`' rn'x J , , x -X - _ -X _ -X - —X - .y - - - -X - - - - - -1 11"-C. SUBJECT TO A AHD B ABOVE -t THIS 5 TIE PROPOSED 12'-0•WIOE lf, , ACCESS EASEMENT lr +r f 11"; S O gJ D $ °7 v D. EXISTING T-O-:wDE DRT SURFACE d L �/ 8 d _ N'-0'! P ° 6 ,y Yf'� J /` - Aire= a °� ° =SHEET TITLE:■O ci",,,b , 'F'.r.,1-8 $' �a SITE PLAN W r'•I t ....1.F.to a, o $ �,t f d m�' °x �p ° MIL J 0 0 °o L64 o(y_ /- /..% =SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:- DO NOT SCALE DRHYNGS. ALL OINENSIONS OF ANO BETWEEN EXISTING C 0 il` ,�:`IJ E BUILDINGS STRUCTURES.OR RELATIVE DISTANCES AS SHO*N BETWEEN EXISTING DINGS STRUCTURE$AID THE TRUE NORTH ARE t0 BE CONFIRMED BY S B1 i ____ SITE PLAN _ ® 1 99B288 ,`` ; T i �11� w . 'iriti 111#11,1,1 w -2 = tt. v 1 ■ � . r'p• . 1111111110 alp'a II =� ; . --.--4..._ .! 1 1 77t7-4-. - R-H 12 i - - :gin r_i _ .._ _ __ - _ —�: �= 1 . I .41 I,,. .- try_:.,... _y _ ► t-: �,' —. _ t L_.1 . . ,,, • - .." r ,.__r_ ).-- ., .7_,,,,,--:- Ill • _11 P--ii _IL cll._ ___.,--,<- iii It . ••,..r.1 ,:-. ...."." . \ A MI k t i .-- -4, ',. I , _„,.. \‘ L'' ' '' ''. cl..". •":1 i'..".""". ' ' . -I.-t'0-----.. 1:... - -- • 4 ::,: F : [A ,1 1 r i\`�•` ter= ` ,, ��-•.�.��ilia -4-__�-__ 1 , I\ • ,..-- %,,... .7 \ —1-03.1*--::. . — LH — 1 4t400. r 1 x - ` . ;„. { it l al ■ I L -., ..>,,,AN., --ik, ,,. - A,i'',,,,- .4,440 , : ti !IL,! r ,,,., \„`� '+ � .'—. j is ( `�j rte, z , j �' �_ I - I ../.10i4>1.:.,1 '\ \\. ... . / .-\ • ' / I -1 .: s...' \-;":' ' ` ! "TY , , -4 . .�•` ' _! C ``\_. (pAbNICIPAt L'OORfr .1 �A- /. •\ + / / _L_i i_. . a od a Fr ! .. .. , • . ... 217&99/Cash COO6C Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Site Zone: Professional/Administrative Commercial District (CP) ` THIS MAP IS FURNISHED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING PROPERTY AND THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABRWR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOS"`Av ACTUAL SURVEY S S AMER,C 4 'ti First American Title Insuran Company of Oregon _ Alirk, _ An suum°d bus,nsss name of TITLE INSURANCE ce COMPANY OF OREGON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503) 222-3651 is 1W 36CD m w 1341.88 TO RE-ENT COR.OLC . LU WASHINGTON C / Q INITIAL POINT �� SE COR SEE 1 / Cl) ` 2 I FRIENDLY ACRES r— J.WURZ 1° NE COR. {� W ^I T T C.X\II PFAOFFLNW COR. i FAFFLE C.R.975 T S89°26*E T S •• 842.72 TO NW COR. C.X. PFAFFLE on T HAMMER 129.85 1 1o5.55 500 130.03 1 401100 -94-70912 116.2 84-40597 152.16 130.03 I .34 Ac 1002 600 1 .68Ac. I ./.5 c. 100 I /.06 Ac. \ 10041 a I h W a N1 O A N N 10 I i r n I e O N co er O 1 O I ° ' N n N N F W1 o cr • m 1 0 0 W — �. 'tit N O 0 ml t °`� N m O m N A r ° In : 12.46 108.03 N 1\ O W 130.03 130.42 A I o 55.9 129.92 I o (C.S. 25,446) I H 1000 1 IA a) 1.-- 15 2.16 2.22Ac. N �— — — 121.0 9 111.1 1 to o //2 116.2 -...1.)}� 3 1I In O I I N I O °II r 0 gr I I 129.91 9 N _ m __ 130.03 __LZ73_ _ 130.03 N a o 2 I. IT N89°28'W 4203 4Z.OA_ 4- 4- 5 e 6 1 la m \O 9S 0 \ 1 1� P y 1 b�AO \\•59 \!.\ I_7 mp l A Wp el• • MI , Q O \6 L • .` 1 , Z 11 1001 A-1 .I ie� . _ - I eg e ixSG • sTO,gO 1, (001 0 4. 6y.26 ` \ 66 •Ac. .°.o / t�gAt e\ C, 'a' ii ott v.o AS / e\ b • V Q 2 A r ;1 \ \060 % • 0\\C.S. zoo o m \ \ 2 oA I �z. ,•et SEE MAP • 0iL. F*y� O Im iX • 66�QFP ti°L9ti IS 36 C C C. ,,., t I 4 Slki \1 I-- — — • • 'fit, PCI. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE. SUITE 100 82 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 -PROJECT INFORMATION: CASH/VACANT LAND EXISTNG PORER/TELCO POLE 11481 �HALC w. /�T J \ 110AR0, OR 97223 / / / WASHINGTON COUNTY s //// SW HALL BLVD. .. - URRENT ISSUE DATE: ,T// 4/7/99 ExNSTNG POwER POLE v - 1 � - SSUED FOR:�` �� (,,,.‘L,\. ^, V / • t y Y n Sa mr y L 4 4 - / J j EXHIBIT XHIBIT "B" T(' ) I Y .b,./ . i J. ;j� Y° . y ✓i 0 �� o ., ' ��fle• L{ -...-, i YN O(L .v v L .j b O� y y y EV.:=OATS: llESCRIPTION: iY:—C.�Qyy� ri �O J � J I L L V Y Y ,P G ..i. 0 t Qe9� dg . 4, .y _; % c l(-7'\) � L . .y k l COM TL e Y pO , �JO 7x O • YArt,' Y + Y® f _' / `_ r/ If � t I Y J L b p CQ � W oC �d Y y '/ \ l 1r � L Y •Y L W L Y Y L y t � � y L k J, Y - 'J � / b( Y{ /r�: .y Y L L y �� _( \l Ji y L L L L .y Y Y 4, I' `' 4' 0 _ J7 �� J1 v L l C'S r),(_:. �..�U/ y),, !C € €. Ck •, .y L . L L 4' Y y 4' Y Y Y n U J �1 0 «U111 � A lZ' I L L V L .y .Y 4. Y Y L' . ��0 •:3 y a//` t EXISTING SHRUBBERY _.)�( J LJ 0 (B Gi y g 0 c..--� v . i d L W Y Y Y Y 1:Q ^ y 7/ # y y L Y Y L ` E1X571Nf Y-O t PwnE AVED ROAD 0 APPROv w w yW W m 4/7/99 S UD F"OR LANs PREPARED BY: 00 Y W W .y `Y Y ` a /�y '��C.o`er C DELTA GROUPS PROPOSED � 4- .Y + Y .0 ` Y y Y Y ROVING MM AS' 0 q lTl1Y EASE/401T y y .y y y ,� / kihh..ENGINEFRIIrIG.INC. r ) ((( O ' k 0 ,/ PROPOSED(2)6'-0'x6-0"CNAN w Y Y 4, OA o .JJJ- 3990 STONER= O a,� I Nn Piro« a 94588 N O VT' u«ACCESS A rat.. ' f�v ' Y GATES Y Y Y v 0 M_] 92-.68 of r s FAX 92-.68-3999 U O sr /"1 '; / `' ` L ' `, y Y 4. 4, o 0 ONSULTANT: AI'n � Y j `Y t PROPOSED CPS ANTENNA .L , Y Y Y &. ( `� C 4 .1 4 s a li , i PROPOSED 40'zw•LEASE AMA G/ j A y' W W •Y L W W .Y W `Y `Y ar4+0 Qb-v''3 d .yY W `Y y `Y W W // ��O�... 0.1_8,__,;4:,,,-- ¢� ' S J'� �/. ,�/I oN PROPOSED SPRNT SLAB EawrEiir .---0 .o {7.�. ,,y U,✓j^ /�, Y y .L L ,y W `y •y 4' .Y 4, y V J'�� , �, PROPOSED 6'-0"NIGN Cwt /////Y--�''''''''�'''��o UO +RAWN BY: CHK.:=APP.: ' D T ,'fk0° - LPN FENCE .y ,y y y l .y O V Q A. SUBJECT U C TTION Ely `Jr' J D° (, y * k I O C C PROPOSED SPRINT Pcs NAM PA Y -'Y 'Y Y 4' �.�`7J 0� C G I MRT —[:=II—7—=3 ASAIIrts DRS LNE IS THE El c4F e' P f',,�. II 1 Al l-o M I L (3 PER SECTOR.3 SECTOR TOTAL) •.--- 11��, �y6y�_I EP r L -Y .v •v N' 0 �� CENSURE: PROPERTY VIE /`caQ 1. cej)5)e/ ii • x 1 , �_�_ /� n°od 4/6.�IO.4 b - PROPOSED 45.-0'H4'N STEEL WONOPOLE v .Y Y Y ` .. Ill) 0 ,C, a IF LATER THE SURVEYOR CORSNNES THAT ° • rte.". _ ca( '—J L /� THE NA CO i TIHS RMD BELONGS TO i'�'' -r c. �J,rI� • x L 4, J `, 4, l /� ��/ THE sort DECIDE I TI SP OM - ,-� .o / �i if \I y I I /-/�j-J � Q l!(� PCs TO NAVE OE SE[ROAD OR `tnh FENCE s-a't MIL cww INK v 4, r Y / L �i`� tJ A�STTI(RwAC¢SSEwsElrtrir. (B.AND D. _O k 1 a '?o- z1 FENCE \ 0(:.`i1 -y^ \ /"� SAVNG Spit CONSTRUCTION COSTS D J 'T II L , t L �- , . L ■ \ YY ( y1� „J// Q G/- �,�J r X'3�,,�,ti.._ X ��T.1=II x —c — —z — —X — —x — —z — --)t `■ —K — —Li —IT •/)-AIL 3eR- y~ 11- C. ABJECT TO A AND 8 ABO°E � J J ^ TN6 6 TIE PROPOSED 12'-O''AVE ' • %. L ACCESS EASfIIENrt N ),_,:i.-."_10 a F4 if QPa ° s a a1V �_ , .. O ; '8° .'� O D. CXISTING Y-0'4 WOE OHTT SURFACE NId'-0'i `.s, T \ Y. /` 5.6)? _SHEET TITLE: I'U(J r1 'w'�$ S cy \ , ' / , \t �' " ° e' o�r\7', 3,_`v cc „, °4- - ° 'J° / "C/ •, , Di ° °'?v'eR° r SITE PLAN , \\)\'St.7. 1 'v 1\\TV-`t, -,c1 l 1)( Jr__,.) �} °,°o 't{,S °$� d 0 ' 0`.-'144:. 'r-_ =SHEET NUMBER: KEVISION:— MIL 9\00 NOT SCALE WARMS. ALL DIRENSNOROO OF AND BETWEEN EXISTING O' i T„f� { I %.., BNLDINGS OR REUTTYE pSTANCES AS SI WN BETWEEN B1 CONFORM BY�T1PtES AND TIE TRUE NGRTN ARE 10 BE 1 SITE PLAN 1 NORM ® 1 998288 • Sent By DEL GROUPS ; 192546 5; Apr-8-99 9:24AM; Page 3/3 TA GROUPS ; 19254680355; Apr-8-99 9:23AM; Page 2/3 •-- r irS13171X momoup 11.1100 Oa MM.. ► ■ _ I .gas oNeur Olat, SATE IOD alASAMCK G i►SN • CT di01i1ATIDlt . . CAS VACANT 4'nu •iT®as'-r TM,0,00[ 11.11 5111 10/J. OVA. TtGARD, OR 97713 ' Mom NADIR)a^,P� ._ k„ir — iMBiMJG10N COUNTY jf'elks " ' • �. ,:`r iii- ti •.1 I I - 't ,•, ,l_ . . ISSUE OATSMIMI MRS Sac ;.�'1� j �� - `...'�.� - •. . �,.Y •; �. •• �' ` � �, _ —72•L,' 4/7/99 0014 LW.aiw e,ets -.� ., ' r4- 1 ` 7 1 iI ,'- _ _. ' (, - �. 1 y r -, t ''" r • EXHIBIT "$„ wwroo tins �•a1♦r[ }.. - � - , f^ ` \ _ �lR+1-' ...e...:-,..---,4.- .:ATE ESCRIP11bl: .— DIN= - 5; i' + ice :� ..'-' 4\\.._\ i/ ..... ........L‘Z....T.; * 1/ OP •• ......• - •" Ili '(4.... .....s',........... - mu nay �` _� � ' ��All_ / •, . i , • 64- ..- _ ♦• " 'rah ` G .•-•-•; ,Wo••: Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ---01\1 \lultt'.;k Tualatin. oR )-0h: \lailstnp OR I'< 1.1010: Wee 50i ( I: :00(1 Fax 503 01.: !:;5 April 6, 1999 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 601 Portland, OR 97223 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. Peterson: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaff le in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at (503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, +A) Ryan K. Young Project Manager Print Sprint PCS gco"5°r'4s' • Port land MTA 1 2 1 P B 8 5 7 2 9 9 8 7770 ,W Mohawk.Bldg.I' 5351. 100 .33 APR 06 99 Tualatin.(lrrnn 97062 2362 MAILED FROIM TUALATIN OR 97062 Mailsup:(IWITAA0101 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 ',tint Sprint PCS" •t om d • .v Portland MTA 1 8 9 ^' P B 8 5 7 2 9 9 8 7770 SW Mohawk.7062 F 5301 1 00 .3 3 0 APR 06 99 Tualatin.Oregon 97062 Mailuc>(+:(1H11 M(1101 2364 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97062 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenberg Road Suite 601 Portland OR 97223 v_ . r� • • • _116_c print Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS �" ---0 A llolt:mk Tualatin. OR 9-00, \4ailstup ORTl.1.\0101 '.nice in; 012. 11)01) Fax .O3 o l 2 Ili; April 5, 1999 Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW Fourth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. Swensen: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at(503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, s V. Ryan K. Young Project Manager ,C t t- I *iv Arc 1P. .r .. _. i Yj..:Z.'• —Iv spit Sprint PCS" . Portland MTA 1 4 6 Ar, �� P B 8572 , '7711 SWNkdrrwk,1114F 5371 $ UU .33 ' APR 06 Tualatin.URTII OI O 2358 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97 C Mailukgr ORTlIMO10I Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW 4th Ave Portland, OR 97201 Sprint Sprint PCS" .*,,.....06,,..._ * * * gin,r== Portland MTA 1 4 1 g P B 8 5 7 2 "'0 SW Mohawk,Bldg.F 5 3 5 1 $ 00 .3 3 0 APR 06 Thalami. R11NI 97062 2360 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 97 Mansur-.u 11R11!AAO101 Brian Cook Voicestream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street Suite 530 . Portland OR 97232 -v. Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS ---0 J11' llohauk aLUin. OR 9-06 '.:,1Nwp oRTI .LHliul i =,Oi 0I2 IIIUQ ;03 Il l2 Ilia April 6, 1999 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Ms. McDonald: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at (503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Ryan K. Young Project Manager Whit Sprint PCS" Portland MTA ,121 P88572998 770`u'Mollawk.HIdR F 535110U . ..)1-1 APR 06 99 Tualatin.Oregon 97062 \1;tiltilop !M0101 2 3 6 2 N41 LED FROM TUALATIN OR 9 7 0 6 2 Kimberly McDonald AirTouch 5430 NE 122nd Avenue Portland, OR 97230 M1 int Sprint PCS' ♦ ,t Portland MTA ti�.Mohawk Bldg 1 8 9 P B 8 5 7 2 9 9 8 .(� Tu:datin.Oregon 97062 5301 S 00 . 330 APR 06 99 mailstop 2 3 6 4 Iwo! 3 6 4 MAILED FRC l TUALATIN OR 9 7 0 6 2 Paige Peterson Nextel Communications 10220 SW Greenberg Road Suite 601 Portland OR 97223 Sprint Portland Field Operations Sprint PCS -"-I) jll Ilnh;twk Tualatin. OR 9-062 11uhtop I)RTI mit) \mice ;03 h12 ■000 Fax ;03 bl' IIi� April 5, 1999 Brian Cook VoiceStream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97232 RE: Co-location request letter Dear Brian: Pursuant to the requirements of the City of Tigard's code section 18.798.080, Sprint PCS is hereby providing you with notice of our intent to meet with representatives of the City of Tigard in a pre-application conference to discuss the location of a new free-standing wireless communication facility that would be located at 8060 SW Pfaffle in the City of Tigard (see attached map). In general, we plan to construct a steel monopole of approximately 50' in height for the purpose of providing PCS service. Please inform us whether your company has any existing or pending wireless facilities located within the circled area on the attached map that may be available for possible co- location opportunities. Please provide us with this information within 10 business days after the date of this letter. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance in these matters. Please contact me at(503) 957-1005 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ias.. n K. Young Project Manager . i IIIP• lit • `t ;4 .: Sprint Sprint PCS' 434"0...,,; ,.. * * * t, �—� Portland MTA i r�AMMO 7770 SW Mohawk,Bldg.F. 146 P B 8 5 _ 'I Ilalallll,(MI�,N o 97062 5371800.330 APR 0 1lailulgl:01(111M0101 2358 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR C Kelley Swensen AT&T Wireless 1600 SW 4th Ave Portland, OR 97201 Sprint Sprint PCS' a ..,0. r * * ��_ Portland MTA 1 4 1 "')SW Mohawk,Bldg.F ' -- P B 8 5 7 Tualatin.Oregon 97062 5 3 5 1 s 00 .3 3 APR 0 J1ailsiup ORTIIAA01p1 2360 MAILED FROM TUALATIN OR 9 Brian Cook Voicestream Wireless 1500 NE Irving Street Suite 530 • • Portland OR 97232 • • • lk\...) \Ic> • I. 0.1-1...1 \‘‘',. .1`,, 'i 1 i ,.. .. 1 7,1 t li i il Ili ; . ***--....ss_s . .,,;,;:_-1„.•,"•,- ..„,..-zt-4..). ,......: ... 4 .• 1 N. _4.. 1' _ r t.is • 1 Ir^ 1 _ R;. r _�lriT 1 it. ` `. .._ ... 'ter' - .. �...._ -�_ • L_.f , i�_ y t� t,,,—'- • • a>.r _ f' + j i i'• I. %<' � . r i �t-- :'; � 1 .-ir . . - — 11 it?!ta_T-1 :r 1 1 . • 1-1- -le \'' \:'---.1 •" ..-. _ —7\ i .., /' i LIM 11111114 ' --1. si . . . r, %-1-_. i- !----_,-11.-.iiiiii-..,..„.1_, _ .4._, It 1C--t-—10-----itrill .11-111127-1, :It- W _ —)96 __ ' _ • L. LI w "11 --- liPlii_ • ,O .. c� 1::, _ . V 1 1 c,`•.1 V r JJ 1; ( \y; ;i k i 5" \ 0 i s 1 _ nct,wu \ i, 1 1'F wFnN4 ` _ 1, r''''•1 J\/� -ter' L _!_ �d1 . :' I.. 1- __JAI_ 1 LT- ,, �� 1 f 1 1 \L}J�r 'yi y NlMr I ' \, . 4'` "4Z1' 1 fN1M.N .. �.I/_r_ _1--r'-r1-I i THIS MAP IS FURNISHED AS A CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING PROPERTY ANDTHECOMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABI\ OR ANY VARIATIONS AS MAY BE DISCLOSr" Pv ACTUAL SURVEY 'j A M E R/ 4 First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon _ _ � �� An assumed DuslneSS name of TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON 1700 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97201-5512 (503) 222-3651 1S 1W 36CD 1341.88 TO RE-ENT. CO w COR.OLC . W WASHINGTON C 3 Q INITIAL POINT ��> SE CUR SEE (n 2 I FRIENDLY ACRES Na /J.WURZ in NE COR. W `� C.H PFAFF E T 589°26'E T S •• T T T C NW COR. PFAFFLE C.R. 9Y5 842.72 TO NW COR. C.H. PFAFFLE ^ HAMMER 129.85 \ 10 5.85 I 5 0 0 3 0.03 4 0 1 1 00 x'70982 116.2 84-40597 162.16 130.03 .34 Ac. 1002' 600 11 .68Ac. .. 00 c.1 / .06 Ac. �� o I n W n IOOAI N\ l7 N Cu l'. 10 I Q 71\ N � I ° m 0 ° co \ _ " to el II N N r W1 . w v] (00 �' W _ o� m W r 4' N O 0 _ m O l in N m (° m N) ,`t„ ✓ 0 M W 12.46 108.03 N '�, » 130.03 w I130.42 N Y l33.9 I 129.92 I O (C.S. 25,446) 1 cn 1000 I Ih all I__ 152.16 2.22Ac. N n 6. yd 1 21.0 8• T31.0 \'.? Im N NI 9 116.2 3 col 1 Kf N a I N I �� t- o r I - o v ` 129.91 A9 to N 0 z 130.03 __LT.T3_ - 130.03 1_ _ ?Z.Q3N aI o 25E 7T N89°2H W 42.03 1 c _f. 5., ° te, `1 Io -at \De 9e 1 \ I� I t\ y\,ts \.4.\ � P O W 'DA pm � as MI 01•a N Q V _ \ O T' ° n� 11 - m I 1 11 1001 A-I .1 $ 0. ��• n Aa cP 1001 01 \Z 1 e9. S' • 5?0 i 2 iv v / 1h 6-&- \ \ .66 Ac. o 9A.1 t �o ii oo . \ \ >�,��►t-`" e \�` ta°'�°it. 11 -• 43 pn 9 %". ..., , vA 1 ., ;1 \ O6OQ ` /: • o'. 1 cS °o 7. o co \ °a ,ti. 1e e SEE MAP ISI36CC X S��QF ti\9 • *° 1 S444 II4 11 I- - - „„ri,m,;z=min mi loci `11 ' \ ' iii•nimigis In rizarlisr. : is,. illiirga a 'R-25 -- eassi mimic: ilium mum Nig. / ..,.... '',--7111 laiii. ni -le - OW lin. . - CC ).• -:: ..' It. :Mill le •,-. wo . ... . •.- -, - - a ...___1...._ Imo I - . a... 1 •L. ."-* ---. -- ,- .• , _ ii lir-, --- ' t1-1-1” ... RI-4: ; k -i ,.-1.I .L _._.I..-...:. ,.......j ..1 _ :::1 - -- : - - II- 1--1.1.- -1 ...--.1...f. .. ''' ......1."LA■ Li.. - • .,,,#(1,..-. , ._ .. " I. .. -- [T i ILL • ' t"- ..-.._- ...- II- • 'f.... i 1.---- i 11.-•. ,... __] 1- •--2.....-4.-...-i)/: _!.......:01... i • -:: 14 25 t -J.\ 1-‘ V -.I..' :..i.)1'-':'...." I-- • - - cP /...-... ." • • ,--. -• .1 S. H---r----- • • rr.L.- i ... -4— _ ,-''' r I I_ _ ___,-- -. r- JJ• 1 I lircrilirr • \ --TT , 4 .1 I rd.-7111 , - , . ,, , • R02 1 ..- _ „ ... . i . - / 1 ,J.... ', - 'A... • pitly,.... ••1,-- . - ■, .....A, L , . ,_. • 1 -C-G ----------"Ti ...„,...._, _ . \ .,.. . •),.) C. )'' '. ,,•-• I ....‹ • 1 % ‘ ,'.,\--;•-": ss . >. ....-- ',' \.... . • . c-- %.,__,...... !.-.N 1_411,9 -- --E----it ,.\''-,..,:fiA,..l,'... .•.) ,.,..- t .., ..........- .0. ‘. '. S . t•-• , .•!) •\ 11 I 1 . i'-•• •••... .. _.. .,._ 1 i .. ./....s. • e• , ., • \.../ \• .•'4%,/%\/ X. 1).k* \ 111140fr . i- / .. •. --'- ' I . ......... . % \ ••• I . ■,... .:, , ..... • r_il , .• ....i...,, r „ . • --. / I- 'xi ••• : .., ..• / . IP ....,:.. . % -. t- I . . ( • .,..•.-. ....., 1„ .,>. . maw. , kt--..L..• . pi .., ,,, „Iv' i . ::., -...,,A4, , ..... .7:-....,..,.'N.Y. s',.\ s..,..:,/,- 'L.,. '.' • / \ \ ,..........._ h IL i 1 . st . . ' ' '.1•,!._. ' .."- s • '''‘.`.."' •„„.•,` ''.... .,:://,'' , '■ ji i \•• \ , I 7 -F----. . 7. .•' 3...."'....•••.1 i 'I... •\ ... . 114'.."• /. • it• . : .... - v - "CBU .-/ .\\-• •..„4 - -. - %, i i i 7- t v , • ... /..., \ ..-- IN - •,.-4.- •-•, .4..;,',...,..,, ,Y \ ''''‘.. -- ! I I ...\ /1 .■'..-,...' 1 I ; I \ . 1 $ . f / -- ..i.:. ... a \ Y / .".... •• i ri , _ _ ____ _. ....r. '• . , . i ......___L I I. /*I>:::;•-e.". ''' .V .\ \ ./. \ Ar, I l I -.. I -„,,,.. •.,, y •_ I / r , , • •• '':/ \ "., 4) . i , , / • . '-.i . , .N. i ., at / , \ \ / ". /.. d, -. \ ,. '....I/ ,1 / • .. , , --, / t.....„-; ... ...., , . • / .e • \ -‘, \ , '...-' i • P • ,1 t. 1 . \ TIGAR • \ S d • I \...•- ••. . ..• ctry , , ----•:, .. :, :.:•.- t . ''' "-\-. N I \f'-'. '..;'/ •,./ ir-1,-- , \.. -• .4. , 1 ........... HALL, •' .--•- i \ , ' . -.-T—' • L 1 slL_Li_.1 _ (PT \ . (mbNicipArramm- .7.,-----..;.\--........,.. `....1 . .,/,/ ---c ,.., ,.. \\ / [I i714.i,--p.,.......11...,,,:.„,ii„. ..)„..... • • . . . ...:,1_ ..... .)•.,- . . . .-fr... \.'s''• // I ' 1 217&99/Cash COO6C Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Site Zone: Professional/Administrative Commercial District (CP) % 1 ,,,,difilt, .S.,i416:'IN ', N 'NI. ;t.� II‘ \ 1• ; 0 I.1 i: g.' /fir f .. •,._� 4 /� . - •114: -- ... .. 4_1i '..t ki .4 i . !kis xr, .... • , . ---irt*elim ,,, ,, k.* _ r ur 14/ • 4 •• • ; ■• .►. . -1 •• a t pt • op .: Ai i■f- . - i , . ..... :111:4 4 , 4 Ise, ti,., sea n• y • •• ••• •.• ‘,vti !71 .4 ill illij 0 . : _es e f • ),\ 111ilik te_..,\711. 5 (LAKE OSWEGO) WEST • •RTLAND I N — 1474 / NW "° to PORTLAND 7 7 Ml { vet CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: K.11 ;P-fcgces Date: 4122-M 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): B' Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan L Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan E3v Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan E3� Site Development Plan CI Architectural Drawings E� Landscape Plan EK Sign Drawings (ff•E ) ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan +- 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED N ,; , "-- 1(1E The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES ANL REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared • --rtified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Stud f� Wetlands/Stream Co -•or Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evakcfation ❑ Storm Drai e System Downstream Analysis U Prelimi Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Ge echnical Report ❑ ther 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Cis , t Showing the location of the site in relation to: 7`�" • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision (] Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants El • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date El Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ • Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ • Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 • Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated - on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility El Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • i:\;cu rp l n\masters\revised\ch k l ist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 --7 ( W ME= CI Y of TI A- 1 - -r GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED it- r - )< 5006 BIU1.100N,MATTMEW JILESLIE L O LMAN,HERBERT ENOLA ' a1NTEB,Au5NA 8 a MC Y HAMILTON.BETTY l DE NNY,DONEAS B -- -- PALAIIO,RANDALL A JI - -- - '~ Itl6IF,MELVYNCAND DORIS I IOWLES,EVEMTT (M' — HABTBNS,ANIOEI OENEMIIN,THOMAS!AND URNES,MELINOA Lt TOLUnR,BRADLEY 0 - CNnIMES1aT1 ME Z �L N BE------.IUIIp� ERIN G.COMA PIDGEON,KaREMEiIONNW �NE1N.11UES L AMC I. - --- BNnENN1ENT1D0 l IOWERY.TMOMl13 a NATN F------ I MAOOIN.BRYAN CNONGWpY.FRANKUaCNpETIME SBRANCX,LUTHER OANO MMBYL -- _.___ -_. BURNER,KENNETH W CRATILIIINIAILleMARCHETA K CO INGLE.TMOTNYNAAK I— PEELWIIIIAM - AORNAN.IAYEENaSUSAMN � O)KNIGHT.ROBERT f'iNFTHENELEMNTR CNAPNAM,DOUGLASLaDEBRAK LUNOS.TIMOTHYANOAKIO-- GALLUCCI.NAOMIALVIATR 1 HUYHH.HIED NGOC - ---- WICK.NURRATA WOO,SANG KII.AN OK SON I i WEBB.NORMANA PETERSEN.MA RGANET WETATE 1 RUIE-PRA00,CUAUNTEMOCa KING,STANLEY H TR 1005,NELENp 7-I PFAFFLE - -. _. ROAINSON.iNOMASVa SUSANF [stJBJEc1I SITE i 1 i ,; PFAFFLE ROAD PARTNERS �' I''' IEIG,NEEFFREY ET AI ` L T ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD IP -- PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES.I .), NBMCHA'NM INC RARASCH.STEPHEN C H CHEVRON USA INC ': 0 IN 400 300 Feet IN 244 Me IIIIIIIk - - - _- \' 411' FOR: Susan Brown, Sprint PCS yo li.- p City of Tigard 0 RE: Sprint Cellular Site #P029XC006-C YIB MI Ra1M 9n this map is for general location only and ifrodN V0140 Pied with the Development Services Division.' ( ISI36CD 1 00600) 13125 SW\- I — Tigard,OR 97223 (503)63441713 http://v6w4ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:May 4, 1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 1S136CA-03000 1S136CA-03100 DENNY DOUGLAS D CURNES MELINDA L& 11185 SW 79TH AVE 11215 SW 79TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA-03200 1S136CA-03300 BRANCH LUTHER 0 AND LOOS HELEN A 11255 SW 79TH AVE 7935 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA-03301 1S136CA-03500 LIPNOS TIMOTHY AND ANITA ROBINSON THOMAS V&SUSAN E 11305 SW 79TH AVE 1527 LAKEFRONT RD TIGARD, OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 1S136CA-03600 1S136CA-03700 KNIGHT ROBERT W CRAUGHAN MICHAEL J&MARCHETA R 11290 SW 79TH 11260 SW 79TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA-03800 1S136CA-03900 PIDGEON KAREN G&JOHN W ROWLES EVERETT R 11250 SW 79TH AVE 11200 SW 79TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136CA-05300 1S136CA-05400 LOWERY THOMAS&KATHLEEN KING STANLEY H TR 11225 SW 78TH AVE 2809 NE 58TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97213 1 S136CA-05401 1 S136CA-05402 GALLUCCI NAOMI ALVIA TR PEEL WILLIAM 11285 SW 78TH AVE 11255 SW 78TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-01600 1S136CB-01700 HUNTER ALISHA M&ERIC V HARTUNG JANICE L 11155 SW 82ND AVE 11185 SW 82ND TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-01800 1S136CB-01900 DAVIS DWIGHT J DONIS L PFAFFLE HELEN N TR 11215 SW 82ND AVE 8225 SW PFAFFLE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-02000 1S136CB-02100 RUIZ-PRADO CUAUHTEMOC& RORMAN JAMES M&SUSAN M 8175 SW PFAFFLE ST 11250 SW 82ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-02200 1S136CB-02300 HADDIX BRYAN S SCHOENEMAN THOMAS J AND 11220 SW 82ND AVE 11190 SW 82ND TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-02400 1S136C3-02800 COOLMAN HERBERT R ENOLA PETERSEN MARGARET ESTATE 11160 SW 82ND AVE 8035 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136CB-06100 1S136CB-06200 DUNN CHARLES A&TAMARA S HEIN JAMES L JANICE L 11230 SW 83RD 11260 SW 83RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-06300 1S136CB-06400 OLLISON RANDY L AND HUYNH HIEU NGOC 11290 SW 83RD 11320 SW 83RD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 136CB-06500 1 S 136CB-06600 WICK MURRAY A WEBB NORMAN A 4460 ALHAMBRA STREET 11315 SW 81ST SAN DIEGO,CA 92107 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136C B-06700 1 S 136CB-06800 CHAPMAN DOUGLAS L& DEBRA K BARKER KENNETH W 11287 SW 81ST AVE 11263 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD, OR 97062 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136C B-06900 1 S 136CB-07000 DEARMOND JULIA TOLLIVER BRADLEY D 11235 SW 81ST AVE 11207 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-07100 1S136CB-07200 PALAZZO RANDALL A MULDOON MATTHEW J/LESLIE L 33 MORNINGVIEW CIR 11155 SW 81ST AVE LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-09100 1S136CB-09200 HAMILTON BETTY I HARTE MELVYN C AND DORIS J 11162 SW 81ST AVE 11190SW81ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CB-09300 1S136CB-09400 SPIERING COLLEEN A CHONGWAY FRANK U&CHRISTINE S 17815 NE COURTNEY RD 11242 SW 81ST NEWBERG, OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136CB-09500 1 S136CB-09600 INGLE TIMOTHY MARK WOO SANG KIL AND OK SON 11268 SW 81ST AVE 11300 SW 81ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CC-00100 1S136CC-00200 BARASCH STEPHEN ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD 485 W MILWAUKEE AVE RM 904 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 DETROIT, MI 48202 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S136CC-02200 1S136CD-00100 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S 136CD-00401 1 S 136CD-00500 PFAFFLE ROAD PARTNERS SORG N JEFFREY ET AL 13612 SW 130TH PL 24 AQUINAS TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 1 S 136C D-00600 1 S 136CD-01000 FINKE ALEX TRUSTEE MONAGHAN FARMS INC PO BOX 23562 14120 EAST EVANS AVE PORTLAND,OR 97281 AURORA, CO 80014 1S136CD-01001 1S136CD-01002 CHEVRON U S A INC PFAFFLE ROAD PARTNERS PO BOX 285 13612 SW 130TH PL HOUSTON,TX 77001 TIGARD,OR 97223 — I H 10 1 -,---- - < , ) H 1-----„ .__ > - - - -I-- - ---I . i• , I1 - - ----I i i 1 I- 1 11 li - ---i I I . .. __Nil oilkno----- :=.--• - El _ ., -- — •Wilt KM ' 1 --. - • --- . - . IHRMISilliARI _ I I_____ -- • .: -- . __•'_kla1.44 0 : -•--_: 1-_:::_f i - i -- ----•-- ---- -" - •••IlEuniko lie; -. roottoodupi l - . % '- . .c.. ,_ joirkii:,_ irig4 z 111KrIFI ni.;- 1,:-.;77.!i • SLUT $ I. 1-";:,... =Z...? ._, ,. iplo= ii_____ 1 —1 * 1-----1111 -_-.. .- . ..:- .- --_,•"-,-: . ., ..?!,11.1-11-11-1°.k iiWilirfai__ 1.-;"[ •-- - - II Et. 1 ,„..:_,._ NOR ' ,_k -„',,:i-;7•' I ''T all'I '•.-'.-r --_ :- • . ' ' illteltka I' i, !TIE 1 i'.-._- :,--_-12. -- - - - - I_ ______j I ,_ _ - ■a , i ,f i Au _ -"-- .' ' -- '2-- 1116.011.111fflis x * * * - - RUI igillitiri: -e. * * * - :.- - :- ma millasta 1.. 1.--, -...,•... -• • u * * * • 1 FFLE ._ —- . . E-1 * 4.: t..t...:_t_t;:-.::-.1.--; 111t-z,i,:.,;;--•-s- - - - - * ,,, • ET7--:=-iiii---;*:--7,11-!5-- SU B j E C ` - :'--=::._-: i-:' \'‘x\y,>\■.-. , - . 1 SITE • . . . __..... . _ -' '-‘,. • - - „, :: .!••T= 1 ._:•!--i--..._ 14.-z:-.. - . *0 * -• *w * .-1 zt.--- _ ...,. -1/4‘'' -7•-••• •- ., d.---, --__-_-;:--'Ai‘N.,,‘..V.:.*!."1.W -- ----_- , I! , I,I ; ; i::; ::--:-:•.... kii -:-..Tr'•,:-i-"---•-_,,• -':• `,.4:,_\:,.■,:‘\iZ ' Illkna -.---..: :_1:::-___- ...::.:/:. *rx * weir.V-I.a.T• ..:.j-!..1-:.-----,......, - ',as....446.,.,- . N (..) * * mr CD -‘1Til::,;;.:i.7 3-'1:-1-1..f.--:•Fi-,---•1.111 • •--. c.--- -• .=- -: .-.;-!F.! .: .-N.N.,-Z\-‘,‘.. ., • ': -. -_. ::,:f:.:-_..-.:_; ...... .:__ *:-..,-, * tn © in -'' '71'::-...='- i--=2:-1:::.' iii:::-.-.•:-=i:::'-6;;;;Iti-'•!"1;7:-T_''1.1..`..-k7kNiN,\AllAnN;--:-- :=--- ' • '''----:4i--- -. -- -- -_ - _ *E--, * cv *--.. - •zr, N.. ;-."414111iit_41014Pirkii ..:' --:-- *--t-17---=7-...- *■--. * -1 u, .--1 *..:-•• * in 0 0 czc -:-;::;;;-.--: :---'-',-17--i-4.-;=`,-ri:i-'..gri: ..... ,.:. i___,-... .-_'-, - • , •:,2' f.--'::..--4'NOR 411.1.01!!INIBRIU.., :•--ii:=--=:71--- i4Iii.:7-!,-,-,-:=';`:::7,-74 1!-1::-.7--z---...7. r --'. -71--,::...._ .-_;•;.--!:: -,- -_--,;: --..;.:--;" -,-..--- :-- - - -:- -- -_ -- ---_- -_-- 44■--I :4 ----el--- -- A-•-- .,-- --...,---= - . ,-----1----- ---- ---- ,._._ ----.-r- -.;--.;.=,_ -__„......_1%,_--;_.:- ! ,7it.-,...:• ,- • ' .- - - -- =.-7-4--_-_-;, f:r- f. _:.f= -s---t:- :-_f-_: f-;;- --!-,:,_-_-.-:=,;_-;•:...i.;:,-. :%-__--...--.1.-_--__ • -1 --_ - _.: .4 * 1",-A. ._ :14 ttit!, -7,1- ,_ - ' l.f7tf•:t_-'!-.-..-- 3-::: s'-, ----_ .;_;;77_.• .-=`. .4 * -'''41;f-"..":;;''''.77.-- --4'- 'Ci-•" 1.--1! :;:=:'.- t.tft:Iff. - -"'' 7.--_' ---: 4010116111111,11111-7-'-:--= .---_---.:z....;- --.- • .._ _ * I- * * --=!:••z`; •-.:Inkiligiliqfill==;-1.-..--:=-;-;-.: -•„.E.--•.- -r--..f s___-_,I.:.,- ..".--:r i:-7-..*.:7=-'7f1.-..fra- - - C,1 -4 ..F.. * - -----,2- _ '-•'''-,_....,, -- r---- -;••-•-•--.•":-.`-'- •-:=-=-.-'7;--''•------ %---_.- -_; i =-__ I" --__ ''.:-:.:: •' .--"!."-. __._ .. _ _„.:-.1,; -7.-.,-.-----'.10-,,':',.-= ;.:.;7-,.‘. -,.-, . -•,-- -.....-..is 0 1-.1 -.:3-7.7- :':37-77:1;;_.-;'-,7---.---z.- .--:,t-7.-: -...:...!-_,F.!';:- -- ':47..;--, -- ---":-..:-:. '-!'t -_-__;".. ‘1' CO Z 2 ----.------4, -, ,,----,- --7-t-, i:-._:-1-3.:3z. .-_;.f r s.-_- ,;,-:,,,_ ..; •.„..,,._ .-:f.;--_;_,_--- co c=3 ::t23±t•-_-:=---1•__7.:77.,,i-i -.-- "-....;- - 7" --:';F:fi:.--'•':•.---1'•::::='==-- -'--7. .-r ' -;-...,-• -•-...'-.:!- --,,==.---- :4• 7.4 ---. _...-:-... M VJI-1 -::-i,-f_11 7r-;.- ;; x-.-..7!....-;-,f_:-1.;:i.;7_•,;--•'''7'.1:i :_',.._a.". .. •_ . -..:•.. • 6 6 W N ---_,E;-:',1 , i-.;'M.7 47.47.:;:t;!..Ft-;:i-e ."1•71;_. . ;- -'----1-.:-7-....---.•L-4: - -';--.1--:E =.5 r 1'-'-.E-',-.V,h--, :-.•±.=_•EEd.2- .- 7 Wein I SP.e_5-.• - in 1...1 Z E•4 t E-1 E-1 ''',7; :-.4.. !7•117.:-.7.-;;..tis;.,..._-__ --tv--.:1-- = -f. :-„,-' 0 71 .14 cn .4 LI C.4 .4 C.2 rA -,'-' --::.• ..::-:..sn-!1.;'f.n:i-2•:-:.i..:14,".,,--:1, ,=::_ -- -1'.--A.:-=1::-..:1•••.7 7.-,_--::-:--:.:..!•-±---r-).• ..== 1 041 0 0 E•4 VI •4 M , -'_-;7•,--_- '”---:::-_,---•-'::5,,:::;-•;-..-7,-;•• - -f.';'•Int:;:- -- *--,.-=-:...i.:.!..i_4:171:-.,-,f-5-- ;_'•-.1 - --.: : :Ci-tri't1" kr, \ --1 \ ...I 5. • \ 9944 • 1 I CM % FOR: Susan Brown, Sprint PCS ( RE: N 1 I ...... RE• Sprint Cellular Site #P029X(006-C , ,. -.., . ..\ • If) (1 S 1 3 6 C D, 00600) ,5. .1 5 1. \\\.• 1 I _____ _ • • Community Development FILE No. 815 05/04 '99 08 "52 T 'SPRINT PCS PDX PAGE 1 .Sprint • Sprint PCS Portland MTA 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F Tualatin, OR 97062 Phone: 503-612-1000 Fax: 503-612-1 081 May 4, 1999 To: Patty Lunsford Fax: 503-684-7297 From: Susan Brown (503-612-1017) Re: Sprint Cellular Site# P029XC006-C Pages: 1. including this cover sheet Hi Patty. Here is the correct Tax Parcel number for the location of our proposed cell site: 1 S 136CD-00600. The Owner is listed as Alex Finke and Lotte I. Finke, P.O. Box 23562, Portland, OR 97281. Would you please provide for us a list of all property owners within 500 feet, along with their addresses? If you need more information, or have any questions, please call me. My office phone is 503-612-1017. My cell number is 503-957-1004. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. Susan , FILE No. 813 05/04 '99 0 42 T n:SPRINT PCS PDX PAGE 1 7 .S'pr ink Sprint PCS Portland MTA 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F Tualatin, OR 97062 Phone: 503-612-1000 Fax: 503-612-1081 May 4, 1999 To: Patty Lunsford Fax: 503-684-7297 From: Susan Brown (503-612-1017) Re: Sprint Cellular Site# P029XC006-C Pages: 1 including this cover sheet Hi Patty. The Tax Parcel number I sent you on 4-30-99 was taken from one of several legal descriptions in this file. Of course, I found the incorrect o i Here is the corrected Tax Parcel number for the location of our proposed cell site: IS13 6CD-00600. The Owner is listed as Alex Finke and Lotte I. Finke, P.O. Box 23562, Portland, OR 97281. Would you please provide for us a list of all property owners within 500 feet, along with their addresses? If you need more information, or have any questions, please call me. My office phone is 503-612-1017. My cell number is 503-957-1004. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. Susan �� FILE No. 802 04/30 '99 13:22 '.,'SPRINT PCS PDX (PAGE 1) EMI Sprint PCS Portland MTA 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F Tualatin, OR 97062 Phone: 503-612-1000 Fax: 503-612-1081 April 30, 1999 To: Patty Lunsford Fax: 503-684-7297 From: Susan Brown (503-612-1017) Re: Sprint Cellular Site # P029XC006-C Pages: 1 including this cover sheet Hi Patty. Thanks for talking with me today. The Tax Parcel number for the location of our proposed cell site is 1S1356CX00600. The legal description is prefaced by the words "A.djusted Area from U 1000 TO Tl, 400." The Owner is listed as Alex Finke and Lotte 1. Finke, P.O. Box 23562, Portland, OR 97281. Sprint must notify all property owners within 500 feet of the above-described parcel of Sprint's intent to place a wireless cellular transmission facility on that parcel. Would you please provide for us a list of all such property owners, along with their addresses? If you need more information, or have any questions, please call me. My office phone is 503-612-1017. My cell number is 503-957-1004. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. Susan I 2 ..v '