Loading...
SDR1999-00013 SDR1999 - 00013 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING s- ; NOTICE OF TYPE 11 DECISION:SITE-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR1 999 41 010 ADJUSTMENT IVARJ 1999 000 ���>naA� d" ME YER IGN COMP A N Y 5 Ping 120 DAYS = 12/26/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00013 Adjustment VAR1999-00022 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 20. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: Denny Meyer Nicoli Engineering 7340 SW Landmark Lane PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard ,OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999 00013NAR1999-00022- MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with t e foI10 ing conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 1. Prior to any site work, submit confirmation from DSL and US Army Corp of Engineers that no permits are required or that permits have been obtained. 2. Prior to any site work, clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure that the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. 3. Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. /464' 5. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover, and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 feet in height and achieves a balance of low crowing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in F e vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. ,L 6. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. 7. Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. 8. Dedicate an easement within the floodplain 30 feet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff Contact: Duane Roberts (x347) for easement language. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 18 12. Additional right-or-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 13. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. driveway apron (if applicable); and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 74th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 14. A profile of SW 74th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 15. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will extend the existing 8- inch sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue southerly to the south boundary of this site. 16. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 19. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 18 20. The site shall be constructed as per the approved plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A search of the City records do not indicate any previous land use approvals have been granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue. The site is bordered to the north and south by properties zoned I-P. To the east is property zoned light industrial and to the west, across Fanno Creek, is property zoned R-7 Fanno Creek abuts this property to the west. The property to the east, directly across 74th is railroad right-of-way. • Site Information and Proposal Description: The sits currently does not have an address associated with it. The property is located on SW 74 , WCTM 2S112DB, tax lot 600. The property abuts Fanno Creek and associated floodplain and wetlands. The buildable portion of the property is, therefore, limited. The applicant is proposing to construct a 14,000 square foot building and associated site improvements outside the wetlands, floodplain and 50-foot water resources buffer area. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce it from 35 feet to 20 feet. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant is required to construct 1/2 street improvements along SW 74th Avenue because all new commercial developments are required to have approved access on a local street. Customers of a commercial establishment on a local street utilize the local street network. Because a commercial development on a local street is only contributing to improvements to their frontage, the local street improvement is proportional to the impact which that use has on the rest of the local street system. In other words, the applicant is only paying for their portion or segment of the local street system. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 18 Any required street irrir..uvements to certain collector or th , ier volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $193. The total TIF calculated for a new 14,000 square foot industrial building is $18,833. The City Engineer has estimated that the cost of half-street improvements is $200 per linear foot. Based on this estimate, the cost of improvements would be approximately 48,800. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $18,833. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $58,853 ($18,833 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $18,833, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $40,020. Given these estimates, the half-street improvements meet the roughly proportional standard. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. In any event, the applicant has proposed and concurred with the required improvements. The street improvement and dedication requirements are discussed in this decision under Street and Utility Improvements Standards GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Sensitive Lands (18.775) The site has Fanno Creek and associated wetlands and floodplain running through the site. The applicant has provided a wetland delineation, which has not yet been concurred with by DSL, which indicates there will be no impact to the floodplain, wetlands or 50-foot water resources buffer. Because DSL and US Army Corps of Engineers has not yet made a final determination of concurrence with the delineation and whether additional permits are necessary, a condition must be imposed that the applicant submit confirmation that no permits are required from DSL or US Army Corps of Engineers or that all necessary permits have been obtained. A condition will also be imposed that requires the applicant to clearly mark the 50-foot buffer on the site so that no debris or alteration mistakenly occurs in a restricted area. If the wetland delineation provided is not accepted by DSL, modifications to the site plan will be required which could also required Sensitive Lands Review approval. FINDING: Based on the information provided, no sensitive lands review is necessary because no development will occur within a sensitive land area. However, because final concurrence from DSL and US Army Corps of Engineers has not been obtained, staff can not confirm that the determination is correct. In order for staff to determine that the proposed project does not require Sensitive Land Review approval, the conditions listed below must be met. CONDITION: Submit confirmation from DSL and US Army Corp of Engineers that no permits are required or that permits have been obtained. Prior to any site work, clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure that the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 18 Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Variances shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using standards of approval contained in Subsection 2 below. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The proposal involves moving the building up closer to the street away from the wetlands. The property is separated from properties across the street by the street right-of-way and railroad right-of-way. Properties to the east are zoned light industrial. The applicant will be ccnstructing street improvements as part of this development. Because adequate access and buffer will be provided and because the adjustment will continue to protect sensitive land areas, the reduction on the front yard setback will not preclude adherence to other requirements of the City and will not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Over half of the site is constrained due to the location of Fanno Creek, associated wetlands and water resources buffer. In addition, the applicant has provided information that the preliminary geotechnical information indicates liquefaction potential that is reduced, the further away the construction is from the wetland. This is a special circumstance that not all property zoned I-P has and is beyond the control of the applicant. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The use proposed would be permitted on other lots in the same zone that have fewer constraints. The development will be required to comply with all other standards of the code. Due to the industrial nature of the use, the applicant needs more truck maneuvering space than other uses, even in the I-P zone. The proposed structure and parking area, provides the needed operational space, as well as, the necessary maneuvering space needed for the anticipated truck types to use the site. Approval of this variance allows the applicant to utilize the buildable portion of the property in a way that meets his operational needs while maintaining the sensitive land area and continues to provide a 20-foot front yard setback, thus buffering the properties to the east. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The reduction in front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet will not adversely impact existing physical and natural systems anymore then would occur if the variance were not approved. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 18 The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance t quested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is caused by the existing sensitive land areas and buffers and is not self imposed. The variance is also necessary to pull the building further away from the wetland area to reduce liquefaction potential which would require costly measures to be taken to insure the safety of the occupants and structure. Based on the narrative and additional memorandum dated October 26, 1999, staff has determined that the variance requested is the minimum needed to insure that the operational needs are met, while respecting the existing site constraints. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the adjustment standards are met. CONDITION: Landscaping and Screening (18.745 and 18.360): Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has 244 feet of frontage along SW 74th. There are 2 existing Ash trees which will be retained at the northern portion of the lot which will serve as street trees. The applicant has shown two additional trees will be planted. The trees proposed are Chanticleer flowering pear trees. The southern most trees will be within the vision clearance area between the two proposed access drives. The note on the plan indicates that the limbs will be trimmed to remove all branches below 8 feet in accordance with the vision clearance standards. The second tree proposed is shown to be in the northern vision clearance triangle of the northern access drive. Staff scaled the distance from the existing tree and has determined that the proposed tree can be located outside of the vision clearance area. Because it is possible to locate out of the vision clearance area and the distance from the existing tree will be approximately 40 feet, the applicant must relocate the proposed street tree to north of the vision clearance area. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed industrial use and residential use must contain a 20-30 foot buffer with lawn/groundcover shrubs and screening. The site is technically adjacent to residential to the west, however, the residential property is buffered by Fanno creek, the wetlands and the 50-foot water resources buffer. The distance from the property line to the developable portion of the site is approximately 240 feet, therefore, no additional buffer is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that shows red sunset maple trees will be used as parking lot planting trees. The parking lot tree spacing provides one tree for at least every seven spaces. The parking spaces facing the street do not appear to be adequately screened with a combination of vertical and low growing shrubbery as the only vegetation shown is Douglas fir trees and a couple of Rhododendrons. Much of the landscape area in front of the parking spaces is in the vision clearance area, however, landscaping is needed NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 18 that achieves a balance. A condition of approval is warranted that requires a revised landscape plan to be submitted showing groundcover, and shrubs that will not grow above 3 feet in height in accordance with the vision clearance standards. The southern and western property lines will have a screen of arborvitae hedge. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover, and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 feet in height and achieves a balance of low growing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in the vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's plans show some vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas. A condition has been imposed earlier in this decision requiring one of the proposed street trees to be re-located. The second street tree will be trimmed to have all limbs below 8 feet removed. The western garden book indicates that the vegetation shown in the vision clearance areas, Fastigiate White Pine will grow to a height of 100 feet (limbs above 8 feet) and Anah Krushke Rhododendron will grow to a height of five feet. A condition is needed to revise the landscape plan to show shrubs that will be less than 3 feet in height. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been fully met, however, compliance with a condition previously imposed under landscaping and screening standards will insure that this standard is met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that they are providing 31 parking spaces, however, staff could only see 29 proposed on the site plan provided (sheet 1.3). Based on 29 spaces proposed, the applicant must provide 2 ADA spaces, one of which is van accessible. The applicant has indicated they will provide 2 van accessible handicap spaces. A van accessible space must be at least 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle. Access drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives horn the street to off-street iparking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 3NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 18 walls or other barriers .,I' markers on frontage not occupy,,, by service drives; access • drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is actually regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and will be discussed further in this decision. Vision clearance has been previously addressed. Pedestrian access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There is a walkway from the street to the building which does not require crossing a parking lot, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking lot striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show 29 parking spaces clearly marked. The applicant's narrative indicates that there will be 31 parking spaces, however, only 29 spaces are shown. In addition, there is no other place that parking spaces could be located that would not interfere with access and circulation, therefore, only the 29 spaces shown are approved. Wheel stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans indicate a 6-inch curb will be provided along the perimeter of the parking lot which will satisfy this criteria. Space and aisle dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant has submitted a plan that shows parking spaces of various sizes (sheet 1 .3), however, no standard paring space is less than 8.5 x 18.5 and no compact space is less than 7.5 x 16.5. Most spaces proposed are larger than required. The Development Data written on Sheet 1.3 indicates that the standard parking spaces are 10 feet by 18 feet which is not consistent with the requirement of the dimensions shown on the plan. Staffs approval is based on the scaled plans and the dimensions shown there, NOT on the written information on the sheet provided. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 18 parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance to the building and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle parking design requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well-drained. The applicant has provided a detail of the bike rack to be used which indicates it can be securely locked and the space dedicated to bicycle p arking is 5 feet by 20 feet and will be part of the parking lots and as such, asphalted and drained. Minimum bicycle parking requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for light industrial uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the building is 14,000 square feet, a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that three bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Minimum off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a light industrial use is 1.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet and there is no maximum parking. The proposed building size is 14,000 square feet, therefore, a total of 23 parking spaces are required. The applicant has shown 29 spaces will be provided and is approved for the 29 spaces shown. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 18 constructed betwee,. new and existing develot,..lents and neighboring developments; The applicant's plans show a walkway will be provided from the ground floor entrance to the public street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkway provided to the building entrance does not cross an accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans do not clearly indicate that the walkway will be paved with concrete, asphalt, stone, brick etc, however, staff is comfortable that this could easily be met. A condition of approval is necessary requiring the applicant to submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant has submitted a plan that shows a 30-foot-wide access and a 24-foot-wide access will be provided, thus satisfying the criteria. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the access and egress standards have been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. Tree Removal: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an existing conditions plan that shows there are no trees on site that must be removed in order to construct the necessary improvements. There are two existing Ash trees that will be retained as street trees. Staff will require a condition that tree protection fencing be in place prior to any site work in order to insure that these trees are not damaged in the course of construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 18 FINDING: Because no trees over 12 inches will be removea, the Tree Removal standards have been satisfied, however, a condition will be attached insuring that the trees to remain are not harmed during construction. CONDITION: Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. Signs: Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C- G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW 74th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 50 feet. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW on this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. Since the railroad ROW is adjacent to the eastern boundary of this roadway, the City will not require a sidewalk on the east side of this street. Therefore, the actual ultimate ROW will be 45 feet. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW along the frontage of this site to provide 25 feet from the centerline. In doing this, they will satisfy the City's standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as required. SW 74th Avenue is currently paved, but not constructed to fully meet the City standard. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half- street improvement along the frontage of this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will construct the half-street improvement as a part of their project. Water: This site can be served from the 12-inch public water line located in SW 74th Avenue. The applicant's plan indicates they propose to make two connections to the public water line. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue, but the end of the line is approximately 225 feet to the north of this site. The applicant proposes a southerly extension of that line to the south boundary of this site. There is also a USA trunk line located west of the site. However, access to the trunk line would be difficult and necessitate crossing the wetland and floodplain. If the main line in SW 74th Avenue can be extended southerly, as proposed, Staff would support that option. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 18 Storm Drainage: Fanno Creek is located west of this site. The applicant's plan indicates that the onsite storm water runoff will be conveyed to the west end of the site where it will be treated and released into the wetland/floodplain area. The concept shown on the plan is acceptable. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use a product by STORMTREAT SYSTEM, INC., which incorporates a constructed wetland and sedimentation basin. The manufacturer information provided indicates the system will have a phosphorus removal of approximately 89%, which exceeds the USA standard. Staff recommends approval of the proposed system. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan and proposal, does not meet the Street and Utility Improvement Standards or the Tigard Trian9Ie Design Standards, specifically those related to required street connectivity, street improvements and sanitary sewer service. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 18 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has proposed a 10-foot x 20-foot screened enclosure. The applicant indicates that the franchise hauler method would be used and indicated that they had received approval for the location proposed. The applicant stated that an approval letter had been obtained and that a copy was included in the submittal package, however, staff could not locate a letter from Pride Disposal. A condition of approval is warranted for the applicant to submit a copy of the approval letter from Pride Disposal for the location of the trash enclosure. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, Staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the location and size of the facility is adequate, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the rovisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building has been located on the site with consideration of the existing floodplain, wetland and water resources boundary. All existing trees on the site will be preserved. Staff has determined that this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 18 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. The project site is within the 100-year floodplain, however no development is proposed within the floodplain area. The Fanno Creek Trail Study (March 1997) identifies a trail within the floodplain adjacent to this development. While dedication can not be required, an easement allowing future development of a trail in the floodplain portion of the site is appropriate. This will not detract from the buildable portion of the site and will not result in a loss of property square footage or use. FINDING: Because the development is adjacent to the 100-year floodplain and a trail alignment is shown in this area but no easement dedication is proposed, this standard has not been met. If the applicant provides an easement to enable a pedestrian trail to be constructed by the City in the future, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Dedicate an easement within the floodplain 30 feet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff Contact: Duane Roberts (x347) for easement language. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be rovided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has offered no comments or objections in regard to the need for additional lighting or crime prevention features. FINDING: Because there are no concerns from the Police Department, Staff has determined that the Crime Prevention and Safety Standards have been satisfied. Public transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area• and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The rojject is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit facility, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because no bus lines run along the site frontage, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 18 Provisions of the underlying zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for the purpose of manufacturing signs. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130.020.D.2.a (Use Classifications) as light industrial. The proposed light industrial use is listed as a permitted use within the Industrial Park zoning district. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table, the proposal fully complies with the exception of the front yard setback which the applicant has requested a variance to reduce to the proposed 20 feet. STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 2.78 acres Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 244.40 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 20 ft - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] N/A - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 257 ft Maximum height 45 ft. 26 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % 40.4% [5] Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % 37.9%[5] [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] The percentages are based on the development area, not the entire lot. Much of the lot is covered in wetland and floodplain;therefore,the actual impervious surface is much greater than 37.9%of the entire lot. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: (1) Maintain 50-foot setback riparian zone — less than 50 feet at the west building face, sheet 1.2, (2) Post access signs 7 feet A.F.C, (30 Submit fire flow calculations to determine number of fire hydrants, (4) Provide a fire hydrant flow test report, (5) 2 exits required off 2nd floor, maybe mezzanine also greater than 10 occ (60 Are NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022—MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 18 there flammables liquio.. used or stored in maintenance area ! Paint booth? (7) What are the 3 fire hydrants for?, (8) the open welding area violates 50-foot buffer zone. Staff response to comment #1 and 8: Staff referred to Sheet 1 .2 and did not see any encroachment into the 50-foot buffer area. There may have been some confusion of the line being referred to. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: (1) Backflow protection must be provided on customer side of water meter. Backflow protection shall be a minimum of a double check valve assembly. (2) Submit plans to Engineering for plan review of public water improvements (Fire Hydrant Installation) The City of Tigard Property Manager, and The City of Tigard Police Department have reviewed the application and have not provided comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the body of this decision with one exception. The comments indicated that a sensitive area exists on the site and that the developer must preserve the area with a 25-foot corridor. This is less than the 50-foot buffer required by the City and, therefore, is adequately addressed. The Division of state lands has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The wetland delineation is currently being evaluated by our staff (Det. #99- 0372) but has not been concurred with to date. Also, a removal/fill permit may be required for impacts to waters of the state from proposed development if impact exceed 50 cubic yards of material altered. US Army corps of Engineers has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: It appears a portion of the proposed project may fall within the regulatory authority of the Corps of Engineers. They provided an application for staff to forward to the applicant which forwarded on as requested.. TCI, PGE, US West and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 27, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 11, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Aeg The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Ticard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with fie required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 18 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal trom the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised In the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . � �� .41/■- October 25. 1999 PREPAR BY: Julia Powerl Hajduk DATE Associate Planner NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 18 am w T,o..o I oermAy a 1 I I.�t....R.aa..„,t 1 .,.t 017,-,1711•174... ... I ..—_.� —_.—__—•• • J I Cl)t N. • MT.'_n 10 • `~ • el KlOURD P. 1 1 '• Ot 11,0740.------0 I• I 1 I Z' Z 1 -` > Z • .rut row raR. 1 1 I t 1 _ r.•ett 1 auurtr 1.a�m i 1 ,177.401,770 i I I ■ ■ ■t r ■ ■■ter M■■■■N■■+�.H �I 0 W.1n.� p� ; I a IX rv� n ti.n .et cis rr..re E MT.• 01 Or..11.,,10., — ..I�..r..•.,,✓ CD I I ''�'y a} I ; I 1 rol t....r �. , ' . V.� I 1 0..17 n 1 1 '� AIt• F ill-t--t--t. O ' •M1 I, V r 1�wen. r ,•r r.r.• u ,r t....r l T Y , t.• raft• lNc R 4IL `ra LesaircuGewar_. wln. .0 l , 1,• i K".:n; i 1. O 17.. ,o. I SITE PLAN I SDRI999-00013 VAR 1999-00022 EXHIBIT MAP N MEYER SIGN (map is not to scale) BUILDING RI :e • ' __ i \-_ t I l ( BONITARD 1 J CITY of TIGARD I � -- MA; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM __ . H VICINITY MAP a— 1 r 7� g SDR 1 999-00013 �CT N O__ li VARI999 00022 F D j2� MEYER SIGN XST A STEECT BUILDING J l Q CARDINALLN ■ n 1. 1. W • Maiiii R DWOOD LN lir 11 ':1: ,1111 ,r' on-p � I 1mm11 0 rn 111 -.n uuui ♦ a N lit INI II 1,4 / GABLE LN 511 "I . 0 200 400 600 Feet -r-t--- ( 7� �� 1"=473 feet vi1.11 CO _, U . ` City ooffrTig A , rd• F_111111 —� W el. Information on this map is for general location only and .!IInii I Mould be venfied with the Development Services Division. 1 � f W� 13125 SW Hall Blvd I Tigard,OR 97223 =• Q �A (503)639.4177 _ Jwwor.ci.tigard.o r.us r. — Community Development Plot date:Sep 8, 1999;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00013 '';, ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 1999-00022 CITY OFTGARD B MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING Community Coommnt ,$'haping,a Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/26/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00013 Adjustment VAR1999-00022 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 20. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: Denny Meyer Nicoli Engineering 7340 SW Landmark Lane PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard ,OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 27, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 11, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal ector's Decision is fil.r.. on the date that it is mailed. All p`..,ons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. I cn ;� �; z x =•� Z I ',�__ :' � 1 I l: ::I! le46 I I!f', INI; ce A . Itl r LLO, -.. % Mi \ IM3 � i SITE PLAN f ruiml00oou EXHIBIT MAP N MEMMK BUILDING lmaP.,304 to wa,ei 1---.' ' \VICINITY MAP I __- SDRI999-00013 E i VARI999-00022 ' � ■i - i MEYER SIGN k , .. . • ... ...wr, r ma - susrECT � BUILDING SITE --I a NI\■■I ■k -- ell �� ■■■■■� /1>> I N ` i ET- I '--11 Cary of naard NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN, .DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY �i� CITY OF OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A(Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: September 8, 1999 FILE NO(S)/NAME: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00013 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 1999-00022 FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addres- .ne relevant approval criteria with , 1icient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." .■',� 1 ., eorurARp - Saunit�ra:n� "rag \ L_ VICINITY MAP SDRI999-00013 I ■ VARI999-00022 l _G 1111:1= HA MM I MEYER SIGN ALE SITE SUBJECT BUILDING I 1111111•11 — `CARDINAL LN • L de% P,atm i 0- 111 ►11111Ij -• --. -11 11111111 i E :: 111 -il111111w 9 \ • 1111111 IIA■ --G•ALEw winit. fox AA, • W N MEMORANDUM RECEIVE;. L.ANNING CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: October 26, 1999 OCT 2 9 1999 CITY OF TIGARD TO: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 1999-00013, Meyer Sign Company Building Description: The applicant requests approval for a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure to be located on SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road (WCTM 2S1 12DB, Tax Lot 600). Findings: 1 . Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW 74th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 50 feet. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW on this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. Since the railroad ROW is adjacent to the eastern boundary of this roadway, the City will not require a sidewalk on the east side of this street. Therefore, the actual ultimate ROW will be 45 feet. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW along the frontage of this site to provide 25 feet from the centerline. In doing this, they will satisfy the City's standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as required. SW 74th Avenue is currently paved, but not constructed to fully meet the City standard. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00013 Meyer Sign Company PAGE 1 this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will construct the half- street improvement as a part of their project. 2. Water: This site can be served from the 12-inch public water line located in SW 74th Avenue. The applicant's plan indicates they propose to make two connections to the public water line. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue, but the end of the line is approximately 225 feet to the north of this site. The applicant proposes a southerly extension of that line to the south boundary of this site. There is also a USA trunk line located west of the site. However, access to the trunk line would be difficult and necessitate crossing the wetland and floodplain. If the main line in SW 74th Avenue can be extended southerly, as proposed, Staff would support that option. 4. Storm Drainage: Fanno Creek is located west of this site. The applicant's plan indicates that the onsite storm water runoff will be conveyed to the west end of the site where it will be treated and released into the wetland/floodplain area. The concept shown on the plan is acceptable. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use a product by STORMTREAT SYSTEM, INC., which incorporates a constructed wetland and sedimentation basin. The manufacturer information provided indicates the system will have a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00013 Meyer Sign Company PAGE 2 phosphorus removal of approximately 89%, which exceeds the USA standard. Staff recommends approval of the proposed system. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1 . Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00013 Meyer Sign Company PAGE 3 be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. 4. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 5. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 74t Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. driveway apron (if applicable); and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 74th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00013 Meyer Sign Company PAGE 4 6. A profile of SW 74th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 7. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will extend the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue southerly to the south boundary of this site. 8. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 10. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 11. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \e n g\b r i a n r\com m e n t s\sd r\s d r 1999-00013.b d r.d oc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00013 Meyer Sign Company PAGE 5 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 S E P 2 9 1999 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VARI 1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, •: 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: (b' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. se,o L% Please contact of our office. gy 09 �S Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v ('Cease provide the foffouring information)Name of Personts)Commenting , c ) 1 ) II Phone Numberts): - SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS vNIFIE D SEWERAGE AG E N C Y O F WASHINGTON C D U v 7 are Y 4E moktimum DA T E' September 21, 1999 SREEI2 VED 9 P 1T9A9N9 NING CITY OF T/GgRO TO: Julia Naiduk, City of Tigard FROM• Ji a Huff/nan, USA J,1 SUBJECT: Meyer Sign Company Building, SD R 1999-00013/VAR 1999,0oo22 SANIT AR Y SEWER The d o ment shOUl d beprovided th means of disposal y't nary sewer. The means o f rsp al � ld be 'n i with O 96 d hra ge Agenc Construction�esign Standards, 1996 edition). Engineer should at public sanitary sewer available to upJacent properties, r extend service as required by &O 96`4 STORM SEWER The d as part evelo Prrent should and have does access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that sewer available to ant properties, et end stor e service as m9u r �f°ms96 44 Hra hydrological analysis of storm G e ance system h1essary downstream conveyance not have te lec1ty to onfl °j me during a 25,Year,2 event, the apPlicanrs responsib �rrnitigating the oes WATER QUALI T Y Devel°per should provide a w ter quality f acility to treat the new impervious surface being of this development.SENSITIV E AREA A "Sensitive Area"exi t Dev elo per must serve a 25,f ntmdor as des s R&O 96,44 separate dthe sensitie area the impact of devejoPmeThe creek, etlan d/sen sitive area shall be, en on plans. Site may contain flood Alai oo o way designations. srading within °°d plaint flo d way one,n such o anne as ethe flood storage d flood conveying area without fect rng any upstream downstream preserve in accOrdane W R&O 96,1sS North First Avenue,� 7a�s 1p Phone: 5 p '6621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 AX:50 3/640- 2s September 21, 1999 Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard Meyer Sign Building Page 2 DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. EROSION CONTROL A joint 1200-C erosion control permit is required. '''4"-7 .1 :-.."2,!:•-?, -;.- . ,ys4-- . If lip; ./'' ", (de_ . •,, • --,iim - .•...;.•i*'.-,• -'-::-•• ';',1174,:i',''.-‘• '. ,4 i ' •1?"'1• •• . \ ----:,. ..• • '14 ..''''' 't, ' ' • dal- -- :. 101'A. A- 0'11 .). . AmillKlinilimibms niReiv:- - -1' -v,.-,,,,.. ,,-1,-, \--,. . _... . . . :. rgrX.-47ralf A7 111111‘7#' 4,..1:111111111ril.Q.iliatitlilikall„7.57i77,:iiii7.7.7.71;:,"c,,-44 . ' ,,,. .1,,v.i17,..r;,.:::,,,04„.7:::11.„./H-6::,,,, . ,. 011,4,7% ...v.,i.:,..,Ki',..,.. N - ---.....,, .. 0 *2.4 VVAZNIIII aii , , li.-1,407- ,,,-- . t. ,, ...... , --iti,imijam alow,...-g.?4, Ai.%... •dmor ,., \ -„ IT1e.., iir.,.e.....milli Pug- 111.14,:iec iiiirawy _... w 4.',' 44r", .de/A '40 /or , 40 1 04. CEI41"ER '',4. ,,,4'.7:V4t.141.i'ili;17,.:1..."'-: '11E1 lig ii-iiiii6.101e, _40,, ,hri i irl..s. ... g /),a ‘oil ,, , ,,- .. .,,,,..--,,,..,-;:c.•,,,-..-•-• • - I „ '..-TrVallim.." Kfialfrio-lifensoreArrai Kan a • '‘rR',,:kA, i MO 0 1111',]."'"' Ina 1.11.1,11tr, ;711a1:54 :-•: 1. itiW."' i• .•..4.:01,4 IFIPIO iiim ,. larrnri tire . :----1:10P""------ ---iiiirpt I ::., mok ...i......._ navei., fie „„ „..... ,0,-;:,;„„,,,,,,i,..,;$4 • Nitssisiss __, .... .- Im' rel P;'-ii glizizAW oagjoi in let 4411- , .--- Ammo unorm„ ,-,..ez: ni,.. • .;-;-7 ..,.. ••. ..; ,i, , 4, ..;,111111.21, Vbilr, ....,..,... . , 1,,,:,i,:r„,,,.::;:;7), • •-• ' • !AM 1161_.1111111.• tsi ;„..,pi., ' gr ... . i Fa seilihni : „,),,::;„%•,,, a -aim ratio,-.1,,,,fri sire"tif.a.:1.1—„,......11i tii:./,,,,,,,,, MIL V51, /4`4,41rbv. .40.744.:•,,=•. , . _ , .."704;:lf4oIrde, . 4^ ..' "1111'.:11PAIIII LII.7111 eirterlittliirl. TIT r!rilr'llt' 11111111111111 Oar: . f,,,,.,0, .0 t,,,,,,,,, 4,,.., \ e''Ar ..m.:11110 opt uag-Am wilsal,p- asamin ropmiRin , 11:1_,, ' - e • ..:,,, , .4. r..... . sAmmlbry vio ' 464 miNigin,.*-34itie us _. ,-;.,,,,,s-- Nigim`li 1,..! , „, .---11 =rt. +14,414°C _.. ..• _ Dr.0,4 , , .• - 44,- __ _ _.... . 1 ,. :,t 4 A 0....K.. .A . Pgrillilli FIJI 111.116/0. g 211111MIN II-. , , - - lit 411-2 geAs • . ivi... ,,„... -0,. . . ,-ii' ktio•‘fr Plelittatili PAINiss No' ,,,,,. .-_.,t.3,.,;./ ■ ,,,,,,_. Eia4:67;44..-• • e .•... - os,nEf, A..=,';Ai !mg' ,,,•i...,_ IM1 NM"411 • 11 i • - „musamin, " . 11181111111-114 .'"W. I ." MI ,,,,Illiiiiii.4444161 3a.,„priiiiF.itarya gem .41= ,..fr,A....e_St IL 1 -..t,:ai •,,-, ,.."-•:.. , ' 'IN -n'm 4*-Mr' ''''' 'SP Ifililitilifil rAlICITID111: ''',•) lig Num firi,T.Frge!41...411 ALA. . ,,. . ...at ma z-14*...4-A wak d-40 10-' '-- laiKa.,-+iiii42 ,": , am gimist,.7.7, Mall Fr,' 40 e-..,4:0•Pe laillott, .- : ''M MU , -.... ,,,.;......41- ilk .:rn et„..-.,- ainucq. inin 1E9,.. .1,:e.;11 pz.___ „„, L.:____,..,,,-...., ...' b„,--F will .,,,,, ,_,,,i,„:„ri;-..,4,,,, 11.....4 11111 0.1.- -vm irelpw#F9Ifek. itimwmpac...,.?ettar•Iii lel ssiimic.70:titgiv: iimmid...... rv.._411 ,.... „,:ai ev. . ., ,,• ,„ -• "in 4.04.4.-or_,'- -;.74-7..• -1 c••. . ream 112,430 .0.1M. Ni,*ibillib7I milt/ 1 s.,' .-.,ik- -2;4146.,1.--;,4".. - .---0, KLA1.- _11' ind.Nt , i, ' MIMI= 111.111Ril 1".■re-lt*gigli PMPr .1,:-. 40$9•.).$1,A' . : 111111111 M A Cri°112111 TIVAIIIII diTallillrA t'liati.iirn:','LLL; VZ*4'1.fli--.;.rirm \ WINE ' ' DR- ' '''' fa' --rfIr sr-, t4. — . — „,,°",'!,3::;;.'!;:, \ your ,i : asi im-a• . IP .. arcf , . _Lliiims !Alifiriiit 11 .-:::, r4,12:11b. ilk,' AbUS.Al trFli-sb ., .:....— bowl ;.i.v irAgeinv it-lig 1 11111E3 WNW. " 4 refe;q`:::::M \rill _, f '''' -A sis op nrit,,,,■.;,,twir!I iii SW \ li I I i ri a al P___ -_iii,1:. A.'-' ,,1";:i111M. \. Ayei; ,iligiw eitrarr,.-.: mr -..- Re ,. Ns ' -.4.,-; ..:;;;;:•ii tt :141811.111 i 1117-'m,0211•11 ow r 0 iif ammo o, in-_ .,,. st , .. I OM" 11 L'ii Itiiiter4 PI 'CIL '''''''' 2 .11411 ilt-r;"'-' Ih■DreamlitP:a 2 slim „inl ii mii•Eiiii....m. pisic,11.-vr'llilt4i .:;,,., ''''--------"i-----' 'virma ,---aw-=MP' MI II PVI ch 'Pi'll'Pren-"""lik WIMP NIINIF.04:01 i. APTI mi ''','', 'I'-'''':''' .. 4P"- •\ ' + ."4 ' 1 A '. rimy igFIELD a' •4-042.-"'-to- +-it .Ann:- .r. .,,., r -, A. ..„,'" ad.; e„..malloul 111. IIPIN..... 4 .4111Mogig libi; in,: maidir 'a'•%16.. . lisvi 11 :1111110 M.I.Tagital 'CT iiiWv,,- tb- 44, --...4-p • ra 11.74 %I .rmirowalac.4,04......-:, Nem ee::: - a - '--,,, , .• i•f,,:,:„..:,„•,),,,,,,,,..„. ,._ , .,:ilienna St/1k.'-ip, gals IP.. r ler Iluni sj ASHFOOL". .1,974...7411... .11'-7:1 kill: 11;=--,. In IIRF*.:Ii1711:1Prowilikflit-r2/,6,1-;;;•.;.!;:, . IP'4.111a• 1 pp..-- 7.0, 1111 I%;- "::■..".- MON al- . •` '''11 a J1111 1111114;z:„.2 itisserA.- --',V--. LN I -A* ■sx: ::- - E. gm . ; HAMLET logiiir :1:1111H,. it,NLILE! 'le-7:: .:'1 ' /:..:.,:.' . . . . T ii ainainsuiiiits_vA`-`all Mit_cs..,awasi ..„......,.._ L..viiplins ...r- . ,. Ili :.)4■?../.'W-r;'' pori ,, IWO vigiki: V. tz,67-..: alimi viTrrirrigi-isiw,evisw,r4 niumilli L.-. ,,,..,.: 116 11J111 1111V.,:,--f. 41111111 r A, 4,,, **Argo ••• -<-4..... /41,1jpi '"' •- Mei/ '!' .,, '.,,- ,:- -,61 ,MUM •66114V#4":21 St 111111111 efr 41:41 CIFA;37tP111.11; LI -.SMIU ed .1',4■Q-46/1:Ipt;.." 1441 ' 17:/... 4.'' ,' l'' / • #0,"4.1 Ullillib.'- r-4* `' *..... i #414WINAI rst•.`40.-% Itik.- -- L• Noma 111[14, u-.Tii,m: ,A.,:::,-;_z ,, Ir% -- 0.. 45,Nr", ..t.,;:,it; ■,-,* s 4,04L IA 20:aktin Pirftglgrts7MZ .A.;,.. 44411111 111/1611111 _5:;,.- AI. ,1111E-re -I was C.:.g •i -4,0,,h, ... .. ..,/a, ii. • '414- - ..,_ --.....0......... „ ,....... ..ilmiims 111.41,.1,,,,:e,f, ) ,„4„,„dri. 7. 141411... .., to, ■,..:,.......ms 41,-- - 0-: ----..„ ,_r - 4'' 1 '4 U1111 I SS 't.*) 'NI 'Iva mliall■ r' PilIliki'lif.A. 'I° in, A .......4 'err til eilli. -41ainria %;:.: iiiiikasil II re. __, • .---- 1 I ii li i, 1 A Niqiit of,,,,,i7r;_,.--:,...7,,,,,..-.,,„.-,,-.:•;-..,:::".. -Is, isi 011 ,- 44,1 •• --igu-; 111---,•-•',41 glii. lla: . - -- „ ,. .... • : . _ -,. . -,-,',/,_,;,,,,,,,;'' •v•' EN_SA ' ... . " VII t /) Ai\ utiffoJi 440,1, .40.411 . Yol'i DIVISION OF STATE LANDS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED RECEIVED%AMINO OF STATE LANDS Community(Development RECEIVED Shaping Better community DATE: Figi SE`' SOteOtbb'r IC 2999 SEP 2 9 MEP -9 A 9� 02 t--C: 2hq TO: OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS CITY OF TIGARD q FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 7 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT WAR]1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING I REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided belo X 7Ze /A,e,$/J ,�,� iS Co y -i! 6( �4 , .�, t ' 9- 637Z ) hA— I A4/ See CA- -.-1 4 lt, 4 ', Ifi , A((t, q /1,....,,,,,,/, ;11 11-1,-,t-A-,, de -7-.-4'-- 1, _4..2 . I ,,,,,....1.._ . . a".... # i■ 4f[i ■• - ..A►L _ice. ' Mi1 s �i !! F! I (Please provide thefolrowing information)Name of PersonfsJ Commenting. /� /!/j- Phone Numberts): cal— 3 VV`-' 336s- ,c Z 5 y I SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • Division of State Lands Permit 1` FP-15411 Renewal 775 Summer Street NE Permit Type: Fill Salem, OR 97310 Waterway: Wetland `r? 503-378-3805 County: Washington Expiration Date: September 17, 2000 Corps No.: 98-736 CYPRESS VENTURES IS AUTHORIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORS 196.800 TO 196.990 TO PERFORM THE OPERATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED COPY OF THE APPLICATION, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS LISTED ON ATTACHMENT A AND TO THE FOLLOWING GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. This permit does not authorize trespass on the lands of others. The permit holder shall obtain all necessary access permits or rights-of-way before entering lands owned by another. 2. This permit does not authorize any work that is not in compliance with local zoning or other local, state, or federal regulation pertaining to the operations authorized by this permit. The permit holder is responsible for obtaining the necessary approvals and permits before proceeding under this permit. 3. All work done under this permit must comply with Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340; Standards of Quality for Public Waters of Oregon. Specific water quality provisions for this project are set forth on Attachment A. 4. Violations of the terms and conditions of this permit are subject to administrative and/or legal action which may result in revocation of the permit or damages. The permit holder is responsible for the activities of all contractors or other operators involved in work done at the site or under this permit. 5. A copy of the permit shall be available at the work site whenever operations authorized by the permit are being conducted. 6. Employees of the Division of State Lands and all duly authorized representatives of the Director shall be permitted access to the project area at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting work performed under this permit. 7. Any permit holder who objects to the conditions of this permit may request a hearing from the Director, in writing, within 10 days of the date this permit was issued. 8. In issuing this permit, the Division of State Lands makes no representation regarding the quality or adequacy of the permitted project design, materials, construction, or maintenance, except to approve the project's design and materials, as set forth in the permit application, as satisfying the resource protection, scenic, safety, recreation, and public access requirements of ORS Chapters 196, 390 and related administrative rules. 9. Permittee shall defend and hold harmless the State of Oregon, and its officers, agents, and employees from any claim, suit, or action for property damage or personal injury or death arising out of the design, material, construction, or maintenance of the permitted improvements. NOTICE: If removal is from state-owned submerged and submersible land, the applicant must comply with leasing and royalty provisions of ORS 274.530. If the project involves creation of new lands by filling on state- owned submerged or submersible lands, you must comply with ORS 274.905 - 274.940. This permit does not relieve the permittee of an obligation to secure appropriate leases from the Division of State Lands, to conduct activities on state-owned submerged or submersible lands. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in civil or criminal liability. For more information about these requirements, please contact the Division of State Lands, 378-3805. Earle A. Johnson, Manager Western Region Field Operations Oregon Division of State Lands Air __ September 17, 1999 Authoriz•9 Signat re Date Issued Salem I\FO\Forns\Authonzation\Permit Face doc Jat-dC'I) / r/ hJ ATTACHMENT A Special Conditions for Material Fill Permit No. 15411 1. This permit authorizes the placement of up to 11,266 cubic yards of fill material in Sections 3 and 4, T2S, R1W (Wetlands/unnamed stream) for construction of road crossings as outlined in the attached permit application, Attachment B, map and drawings. This permit also authorizes the removal of material for wetland enhancement and creation as specified in special condition 6 below. 2. Turbidity shall not exceed 10% above natural stream turbidities as a result of the project. The turbidity standard may be exceeded for a limited duration, (per OAR 340-41) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented as applicable, including, but not limited to: -use of filter bags, sediment fences, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, or other measures sufficient to prevent offsite movement of soil; -use of an impervious material to cover stockpiles when unattended or during a rain event; -graveled construction accesses to prevent movement of material offsite via construction vehicles; -sediment traps or catch basins to settle out solids prior to water entering ditches or waterways; and Erosion control measures shall be maintained as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness, until soils become stabilized. 3. Petroleum products, chemicals, or other deleterious materials shall not be allowed to enter the water. 4. Waste materials and spoils shall be placed at an approved upland disposal site and not in any unauthorized wetland areas. 5. Removal of existing woody vegetation shall be minimal. -page one- Attachment A RF 15411 Page 2 of 3 MITIGATION CONDITIONS 6. The following conditions apply to the replacement wetland as described in the application, Attachment B and as depicted on Figures 12 through 17C . a) The wetland shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the permitted fill. b) The wetland shall be excavated or maintained as specified in the Mitigation Plan and as depicted on Figure 13 of the permit application. c) The shoreline of the wetland shall be seeded or planted with grass and/or legumes, native shrubs and trees. Trees and shrubs shall be of the species and quantities indicated in modified Figure 14A and 15. Following planting of the area, the vegetation shall be allowed to establish a natural character with minimal maintenance. The criteria for success shall be 80% survival for a period of three years. d) The issuance of this permit is conditional upon establishment of replacement wetlands of approximately 0.21 acres created and 0.40 acres enhanced for loss of 0.38 acres of wetland habitat. MONITORING CONDITIONS 7. To insure a successful habitat replacement the permittee shall, for a period of three years, maintain the wetland until vegetation has become established and the area is functioning as designed. 8. The applicant shall establish fixed photo points. Photos shall be taken annually from the established points for monitoring purposes. A photo documentation report shall be submitted annually (prior to the permit anniversary date) to the Division of State Lands for a period of three years after wetland construction. • Attachment A RF 15411 Page 3 of 3 CONTINGENCY CONDITIONS 9. The Division of State Lands retains the authority to require appropriate corrective actions to the mitigation site in the event the newly created wetlands are not functioning as designed within a period of three years. 10.The Division of State Lands retains the authority to temporarily halt or modify the project in case of excessive turbidity or damage to natural resources. September 17, 1999 fo\attachmentAwest\FP Fill Permits\FP-15411.doc REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED Pl ANNllmmunity Development Shaping J4 Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 S E P 1 7 1999 TO: Lori Berney,US West Communications CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VARI 1999-00022 ➢ MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22. 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. �c Written comments provided below: v 1 (2Cease provide the folThwing information)Name of PerSOn[Sl Commenting: I Phone Number(s): SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TY OF �I TIGARD Community Development ngA Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 RECEIVED PLAN TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager SEP 2 0 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Mil al u Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Beffa- -caw P/LeTaxii J MUST B& /l/Lovi'o o ON SroAAC 3100 OF L./MT6 A46--/ER. vi iF'I LJ P,Zommcm N 3w4c� Be Aihvi,Vlu/Vt D,c . - Dui �#& V4-1.t/ Msen4 • G.) SSt, i`r p 3 Y it/IN i2EV/E4) Or fie&&i /cl�TEre- /A4Pta✓EME?fl-c 6c; Mate iv r INS 7Y 1 c4 v (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: /11(�� �� 1 I Phone Number[sl: 3q5- I 1 SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED • 41'6 SEP 1 j 1999 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD REGULATORY BRANC.:. RECEIVED PLANmmunity Development taping A Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 SEP 131999 TO: US Army Corps.of Engineers CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell HalduK,Associate Planner Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewe�d e pr pos lI and have no objections to it. Please contact/��r'� �.AIL . Ca)of our office. (5c2.&) 08 � e08 )4�8 ) 5 Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: �, 1�• ` I iS rat I p✓∎ `moo • v : i * /. I l d • t I L g-A Q-- A 0 AIL 0_ I AAt r L j- L ■ o C rxc-\ c,(2_, \A A. Csz J (tP1 ase provide the fodowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Numberfsl: (501-3 4:0.1-4_ - 2— SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD ('ommutiny Development REcE3)7414041440r Community DATE: September 8.1999 S E P 1 0 1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503]639-4171 I Fax: [503]684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRJ 1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VARI 1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1. !► (Please provide the foffoiving information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: NI\J o\� Phone Number[sl: -I. Z20 SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLONINe A Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department SEP 1 0 1999 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Manning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: [503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEAE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: I Phone Number[s): I SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD R(:(;EIVED Community Deve&opment � etterCommunity DATE: September 8,1999 SEP 1 3 1999 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4171 I Fax: (5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MID 1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,0001 square foot tilt-Luip concrete structure and associated Site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: $ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 14 '► (cPThase provide the fogawing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: � Q ,, Phone Number[sl: s�o Soto SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLANNING S(tapingA Better Community RATE: September 8,1999 SEP 1 3 1999 TO: Acting Building Official CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031 6 3 9-4171/Fax: [5031604-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT(VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: . r ) C 1, Zo n c 1-1„, c'c &3, w�ci j- Gl f .,� f-C �� � I./2- CZ) ea f)-- 4etesr 11 321 71 A--F7G►. 0) f �ty1tt- ! tv'e 1 t0►✓ ea I ltSr�t' +d t 71-4y e, I'r' t, dl .� r 1- let/ tef (KP17drt'. ( ) f'oc, t--5 (? '1 eFJ- ).2I pt '� / /►')Ay Ph ez- 4-, JP /D • cC— (G) 4 +k1 r. Pk-4-n,, )t L-!I t, ) ?f +1 t co? ov l�^tD v,r✓I // / LI r(j ; 1 "N 4YLN f y�cr ? 6�rn 6 P 0 I-h 7 0) L.-L.1- AQc t-k, �� 1 ' Ire turf 61Cn v ; (b) -t1., oeefr, ��l�, � 41-f4 L 1 ) ,, Se/ f 64FFerz, c Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: , y, I Phone Number(s): v I SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A. CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: September 8,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 1999-00013/SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR)1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 22, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v ( Thase provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CIT Area: (Cl [El IS) (Wl CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS Li Place for review In Library CIT Book(sl FILE NMI.: ,,L.A_ i 9P9 - - ,, . •, FILE NAME'S]: ,7--, , ,40 CITY OFFICES __LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,s p.,,,u. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./LMP.nm Svcs T.ehnici.nn I4POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevenrenonece, BUILDING DIV./David Scott,aimingotf.w 1t�NGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,cmpmni Rn ewEnginw WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,umtle,Me eger CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Cry Recorder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,eropeeyMenage, _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE i TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*_UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM • 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _Mel Huie,G reenspaces Coordinator(cPAs/zoA's) Larry French PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97 30 1-2 54 0 15300 SW 116th Avenue Bonneville Power Administration WASHINGTON COUNTY* King City,OR 97224 Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Trans. PO Box 3621 Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Portland,OR 97208-3621 Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _ 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 OR,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA's) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 811 SW Sixth Avenue _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97204 ODOT,REGION 1 * Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Sonya Kazen,Dvpmr Rev coon Jim Tice pcAs) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. 123 NW Flanders _Tom Harry(current Pl.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Phil Healy(current Pi.Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Sr.Cartographer(CPA/ZCA)Ms to Portland,OR 97204 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Right-of-Way Section(vacaeens) Portland.OR 97221-2414 Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO30546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE(Apps E of HaiVN of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Mero Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * -1N01CATSS ANVOMAPIC MO TIM APION IF M MUS SOO.OF rear SVaJtCT"Roman FOa ANr/ACC apv Simmers. /raOACCr PLANNSS IS 11tSIONSIt4t/OA INDICATING SWISS TO NellITI h:tpatty\nasterskfcnotice.mst 22-Apr-99 MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIOARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community STATE o f OR EGGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: fCnec1c Apptopiate Bun(s)Bebw} L NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: TT AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director E2I NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-000013/VARI999-00022 - MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Dale of Public Heanny I ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:l AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council Li NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: C' I (I de No Name Re`eren_e; (Date of Public Heanng.if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked. .. Ex I-I :", on the 28th day of October, ' '9, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 28th day of October,1999, .• .►e prepaid. (• r n tha,Prep. -• .Ot lr ,rf_ s/r__ 33z. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /D day of •' - OFFICIAL.SEAL L�tJA Wi�`-• ' `,J� DIANE M JELDERKJ ' I . ' r I 1 I ' 1 J NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.320678 My Commission Expires: 9/7 �� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07, EXHIBI A , ' ��Q. ,u y l 3 -n . r a- rvt , rte t k, Al- /I f t- r ' u l �- 4/ a�ITY OF T©AD y f a m r' 4 r ' Bm a r� 3 "! a ''''*,1� s e ry r � 11 g 8 ,10:m 12/26/99 g a � • � Ill YS =a r 120 DA 4'a SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00013 Adjustment VAR1999-00022 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 20. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: Denny Meyer Nicoll Engineering 7340 SW Landmark Lane PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard ,OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Kw- ypv' '' "v x; ..),::$,�`� q S. @s <r/:�r9✓v.r ,c F al a, °. 'r v�w £ . �, q W.? r' ,am y' c/ K ✓ " :T, %k " .3yfA, 1'E l rp,4I All documents and applicable criteria in the he above-noted file are available for inspection or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged at no cost for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 27, 1999, BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER AND 11, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal., The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. t.,. Z I..-....e....1.._:,....... 1111 4-.!`2 ��1 ... �._� HF W} Z = Z Ill rl d 1 11...1:1...•«.—ip,l 31 O i `;w I j o= _ 11 kNo,i I I ; ;N; _— E : , I- ON \( IITE-- 1, — - mil ; . 1- >- 71;4 I il, iiiiiii . , 5 SITE PLAN 1 VAAA1999.00022 EXHIBIT MAP N n[reA SIGN 11 ONG epu.w np .............. 4q r 1f\ VICINITY MAP C _ Y SDRI999-00013 i� VAR1999-00022 - -I-- --- --'I �w g S r MEYER SIGN PI --- SUBJECT' BUILDING SITE �,.. 1 fir- _ �,,.�W — H _ _ _- - -J \\____- ?,. ' ' lor r. ' 1 ne L .! I LN 7c, , u. . ■ .?" 7411I1111 - III ` = :I -- 111111111th - IIIIUw ■ N Ao _I- ' — - — ,111 l .�w , , n o- y'4tcwu wr W ,,, „=—_7.7_50.-_=550,1,.- ....a a�wr r..u... - _1 Qq ,a'r'e ..... aaw Si 1111.- __—L 1 " •!�%d' 1111,.. g/9Iq-40013 EXHIBIT B 2S112AC-01300 2S112AC-01500 RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 14905 SW 74TH AVE 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PORTLAND, OR 97224 PORTLAND, OR 97224 2S112AC-01600 2 112AC-01601 SKOURTES JOHN&JACKIE TIG•'* CIT •F 17010 SW WEIR RD 13125 • L BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TI RD,OR 97 23 2S112AC-01700 2S112BD-00300 INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M 15065 SW 74TH AVE 11720 SW LYNN PORTLAND, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112BD-00400 2S112CA-00100 MALO ROBERT W/VIOLET MAY MALO ROBERT WILLIAMS ET AL 11720 SW LYNN 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-00200 2S112CA-00300 MEYER DENNY G&NANCY L RD Y OF 7340 SW LANDMARK LN 1312/5 ALL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIRARD, OR 97223 2S112CA-01300 2S 12CA-01401 HESS CHARLES A AND TIGA'` CI OF 7755 SW GENTLEWOODS DRIVE 1312 :11 ,•LL TIGARD,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-01700 2S112CA-01800 SCHROEDER HANS HEINRICH KREICK JOHN E AND MARA 7725 SW GENTLE WOODS DR 7715 SW GENTLEWOODS DR TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S112CA-01900 2S112CA-02000 MILLER JERRY A&SUSAN R HINTON JANE F 7705 SW GENTLEWOODS DR 7695 SW GENTLEWOOD DR TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-08700 2S112CA-08800 TAKASUMI RICHARD C&DEANNE L VALENTINE DARNELL 7556 SW ASHFORD ST 7546 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-08900 2S112CA-09000 NESS J GREG/TERRY M HAWORTH MARK S/DEBBIE S 7540 SW ASHFORD ST 7534 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 0 a . , 2S112CA-09100 2S112CA-09101 QUINGE DARRYL F SJOQUIST W C AND HELENE M 7528 SW ASHFORD ST 7522 SW ASHFORD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-09200 2S112CA-09300 SJOQUIST W C&HELENE M TRS KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7522 SW ASHFORD ST 7510 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-11901 2S112DB-00300 TIG•'II C OF PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 1312 : H• 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI ARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DB-00400 2S112DB-00401 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 201 MISSION ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 2S112DB-00500 2S112DB-00600 HUBBARD VIOLA I MEYER DENNY G&NANCY L 15065 SW 74TH AVE 7340 SW LANDMARK LN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S112DB-00700 2S112DB-00800 WESTERN UNITED LIFE ASSURANCE CO JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15245 SW 74TH AVE 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 JIM ANDREWS NICOLI ENGINEERING & CONST. SVCS. , INC. 9025 SW CENTER STREET PO BOX 23784 TIGARD OR 97281 DENNY MEYER 7340 SW LANDMARK LANE TIGARD OR 97223 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING f`` cm of noARo Community(Development Shaping Better Community STATE OE OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of(Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ • City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-000013/VAR1999-00022 - MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING AMENDED NOTICE (File NolName Reference) RI City of Tigard Planning Director • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / • AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) E. City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council J NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice; FOR: 1 (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Pubic Hearing.if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"i on the 28th day of October,199 and deposited in the United States Mail on the 28* day of October, 1999, postage .repaid. / ('-rso• atPr•par:• = ice r � , Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befit me on the /0 day of . ' _ ,c or- OFFICIAL SEAL / M� /,/��L� DINE M JELDERI S NI t ' ' ' I ; 11 ' l '• NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.326578 q/My Commission Expires: 7 0 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEM 07, �v1�I'�1T NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00013 ADJUSTMENT [VAR] 1999-00022 CITY OF TIGARD Community'Development MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING Shaping,1(Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/26/99 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00013 Adjustment VAR1999-00022 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 20. APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: Denny Meyer Nicoli Engineering 7340 SW Landmark Lane PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard ,OR 97281 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1909-00022—MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julial-lajduk. 1. Prior to any site work, submit confirmation from DSL and US Army Corp of Engineers that no permits are required or that permits have been obtained. 2. Prior to any site work, clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure that the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. 3. Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. 5. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover, and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 feet in height and achieves a balance of low growing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in the vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. 6. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. 7. Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. 8. Dedicate an easement within the floodplain 30 feet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff Contact: Duane Roberts (x347) for easement language. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 2 OF 18 12. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 13. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 74th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. driveway apron (if applicable); and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 74th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 14. A profile of SW 74th Avenue shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 15. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will extend the existing 8- inch sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue southerly to the south boundary of this site. 16. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 19. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 3 OF 18 20. The site shall be constructed as per the approved plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A search of the City records do not indicate any previous land use approvals have been granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue. The site is bordered to the north and south by properties zoned I-P. To the east is property zoned light industrial and to the west, across Fanno Creek, is property zoned R-7 Fanno Creek abuts this property to the west. The property to the east, directly across 74th is railroad right-of-way. Site Information and Proposal Description: The sits currently does not have an address associated with it. The property is located on SW 74 , WCTM 2S112DB, tax lot 600. The property abuts Fanno Creek and associated floodplain and wetlands. The buildable portion of the property is, therefore, limited. The applicant is proposing to construct a 14,000 square foot building and associated site improvements outside the wetlands, floodplain and 50-foot water resources buffer area. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce it from 35 feet to 20 feet. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant is required to construct 1/2 street improvements along SW 74th Avenue because all new commercial developments are required to have approved access on a local street. Customers of a commercial establishment on a local street utilize the local street network. Because a commercial development on a local street is only contributing to improvements to their frontage, the local street improvement is proportional to the impact which that use has on the rest of the local street system. In other words, the applicant is only paying for their portion or segment of the local street system. With the improvements, the applicant will be providing services that will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 4 OF 18 Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $193. The total TIF calculated for a new 14,000 square foot industrial building is $18,833. The City Engineer has estimated that the cost of half-street improvements is $200 per linear foot. Based on this estimate, the cost of improvements would be approximately 48,800. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $18,833. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $58,853 ($18,833 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $18,833, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $40,020. Given these estimates, the half-street improvements meet the roughly proportional standard. The test does not require a precise mathematical calculation. The test does not require a "dollar for dollar" exchange of conditions for impacts, nor does it require that the impacts outweigh or have a higher estimated value than the conditions imposed. The estimated costs required of the applicant may be greater in estimated value than the value of the unmitigated impact. In any event, the applicant has proposed and concurred with the required improvements. The street improvement and dedication requirements are discussed in this decision under Street and Utility Improvements Standards GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Sensitive Lands (18.775) The site has Fanno Creek and associated wetlands and floodplain running through the site. The applicant has provided a wetland delineation, which has not yet been concurred with by DSL, which indicates there will be no impact to the floodplain, wetlands or 50-foot water resources buffer. Because DSL and US Army Corps of Engineers has not yet made a final determination of concurrence with the delineation and whether additional permits are necessary, a condition must be imposed that the applicant submit confirmation that no permits are required from DSL or US Army Corps of Engineers or that all necessary permits have been obtained. A condition will also be imposed that requires the applicant to clearly mark the 50-foot buffer on the site so that no debris or alteration mistakenly occurs in a restricted area. If the wetland delineation provided is not accepted by DSL, modifications to the site plan will be required which could also required Sensitive Lands Review approval. FINDING: Based on the information provided, no sensitive lands review is necessary because no development will occur within a sensitive land area. However, because final concurrence from DSL and US Army Corps of Engineers has not been obtained, staff can not confirm that the determination is correct. In order for staff to determine that the proposed project does not require Sensitive Land Review approval, the conditions listed below must be met. CONDITION: Submit confirmation from DSL and US Army Corp of Engineers that no permits are required or that permits have been obtained. Prior to any site work, clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure that the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 5 OF 18 Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Variances shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using standards of approval contained in Subsection 2 below. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The proposal involves moving the building up closer to the street away from the wetlands. The property is separated from properties across the street by the street right-of-way and railroad right-of-way. Properties to the east are zoned light industrial. The applicant will be constructing street improvements as part of this development. Because adequate access and buffer will be provided and because the adjustment will continue to protect sensitive land areas, the reduction on the front yard setback will not preclude adherence to other requirements of the City and will not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Over half of the site is constrained due to the location of Fanno Creek, associated wetlands and water resources buffer. In addition, the applicant has provided information that the preliminary geotechnical information indicates liquefaction potential that is reduced, the further away the construction is from the wetland. This is a special circumstance that not all property zoned I-P has and is beyond the control of the applicant. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The use proposed would be permitted on other lots in the same zone that have fewer constraints. The development will be required to comply with all other standards of the code. Due to the industrial nature of the use, the applicant needs more truck maneuvering space than other uses, even in the I-P zone. The proposed structure and parking area, provides the needed operational space, as well as, the necessary maneuvering space needed for the anticipated truck types to use the site. Approval of this variance allows the applicant to utilize the buildable portion of the property in a way that meets his operational needs while maintaining the sensitive land area and continues to provide a 20-foot front yard setback, thus buffering the properties to the east. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The reduction in front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet will not adversely impact existing physical and natural systems anymore then would occur if the variance were not approved. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 6 OF 18 The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is caused by the existing sensitive land areas and buffers and is not self imposed. The variance is also necessary to pull the building further away from the wetland area to reduce liquefaction potential which would require costly measures to be taken to insure the safety of the occupants and structure. Based on the narrative and additional memorandum dated October 26, 1999, staff has determined that the variance requested is the minimum needed to insure that the operational needs are met, while respecting the existing site constraints. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the adjustment standards are met. CONDITION: Landscaping and Screening (18.745 and 18.360): Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has 244 feet of frontage along SW 74th. There are 2 existing Ash trees which will be retained at the northern portion of the lot which will serve as street trees. The applicant has shown two additional trees will be planted. The trees proposed are Chanticleer flowering pear trees. The southern most trees will be within the vision clearance area between the two proposed access drives. The note on the plan indicates that the limbs will be trimmed to remove all branches below 8 feet in accordance with the vision clearance standards. The second tree proposed is shown to be in the northern vision clearance triangle of the northern access drive. Staff scaled the distance from the existing tree and has determined that the proposed tree can be located outside of the vision clearance area. Because it is possible to locate out of the vision clearance area and the distance from the existing tree will be approximately 40 feet, the applicant must relocate the proposed street tree to north of the vision clearance area. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed industrial use and residential use must contain a 20-30 foot buffer with lawn/groundcover shrubs and screening. The site is technically adjacent to residential to the west, however, the residential property is buffered by Fanno creek, the wetlands and the 50-foot water resources buffer. The distance from the property line to the developable portion of the site is approximately 240 feet, therefore, no additional buffer is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that shows red sunset maple trees will be used as parking lot planting trees. The parking lot tree spacing provides one tree for at least every seven spaces. The parking spaces facing the street do not appear to be adequately screened with a combination of vertical and low growing shrubbery as the only vegetation shown is Douglas fir trees and a couple of Rhododendrons. Much of the landscape area in front of the parking spaces is in the vision clearance area, however, landscaping is needed NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 7 OF 18 that achieves a balance. A condition of approval is warranted that requires a revised landscape plan to be submitted showing groundcover, and shrubs that will not grow above 3 feet in height in accordance with the vision clearance standards. The southern and western property lines will have a screen of arborvitae hedge. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover, and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 feet in height and achieves a balance of low growing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in the vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's plans show some vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas. A condition has been imposed earlier in this decision requiring one of the proposed street trees to be re-located. The second street tree will be trimmed to have all limbs below 8 feet removed. The western garden book indicates that the vegetation shown in the vision clearance areas, Fastigiate White Pine will grow to a height of 100 feet (limbs above 8 feet) and Anah Krushke Rhododendron will grow to a height of five feet. A condition is needed to revise the landscape plan to show shrubs that will be less than 3 feet in height. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been fully met, however, compliance with a condition previously imposed under landscaping and screening standards will insure that this standard is met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant has indicated in the narrative that they are providing 31 parking spaces, however, staff could only see 29 proposed on the site plan provided (sheet 1 .3). Based on 29 spaces proposed, the applicant must provide 2 ADA spaces, one of which is van accessible. The applicant has indicated they will provide 2 van accessible handicap spaces. A van accessible space must be at least 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle. Access drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 8 OF 18 walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is actually regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and will be discussed further in this decision. Vision clearance has been previously addressed. Pedestrian access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There is a walkway from the street to the building which does not require crossing a parking lot, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking lot striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show 29 parking spaces clearly marked. The applicant's narrative indicates that there will be 31 parking spaces, however, only 29 spaces are shown. In addition, there is no other place that parking spaces could be located that would not interfere with access and circulation, therefore, only the 29 spaces shown are approved. Wheel stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans indicate a 6-inch curb will be provided along the perimeter of the parking lot which will satisfy this criteria. Space and aisle dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant has submitted a plan that shows parking spaces of various sizes (sheet 1.3), however, no standard paring space is less than 8.5 x 18.5 and no compact space is less than 7.5 x 16.5. Most spaces proposed are larger than required. The Development Data written on Sheet 1 .3 indicates that the standard parking spaces are 10 feet by 18 feet which is not consistent with the requirement of the dimensions shown on the plan. Staff's approval is based on the scaled plans and the dimensions shown there, NOT on the written information on the sheet provided. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 9 OF 18 parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance to the building and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle parking design requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well-drained. The applicant has provided a detail of the bike rack to be used which indicates it can be securely locked and the space dedicated to bicycle parking is 5 feet by 20 feet and will be part of the parking lots and as such, asphalted and drained. Minimum bicycle parking requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for light industrial uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the building is 14,000 square feet, a minimum of two bicycle parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that three bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Minimum off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a light industrial use is 1.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet and there is no maximum parking. The proposed building size is 14,000 square feet, therefore, a total of 23 parking spaces are required. The applicant has shown 29 spaces will be provided and is approved for the 29 spaces shown. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 10 OF 18 constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's plans show a walkway will be provided from the ground floor entrance to the public street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkway provided to the building entrance does not cross an accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans do not clearly indicate that the walkway will be paved with concrete, asphalt, stone, brick etc, however, staff is comfortable that this could easily be met. A condition of approval is necessary requiring the applicant to submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant has submitted a plan that shows a 30-foot-wide access and a 24-foot-wide access will be provided, thus satisfying the criteria. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the access and egress standards have been satisfied, however, if the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. Tree Removal: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an existing conditions plan that shows there are no trees on site that must be removed in order to construct the necessary improvements. There are two existing Ash trees that will be retained as street trees. Stal will require a condition that tree protection fencing be in place prior to any site work in order to insure that these trees are not damaged in the course of construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 3NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 11 OF 18 FINDING: Because no trees over 12 inches will be removed, the Tree Removal standards have been satisfied, however, a condition will be attached insuring that the trees to remain are not harmed during construction. CONDITION: Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. Signs: Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C- G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW 74th Avenue, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 50 feet. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW on this roadway, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. Since the railroad ROW is adjacent to the eastern boundary of this roadway, the City will not require a sidewalk on the east side of this street. Therefore, the actual ultimate ROW will be 45 feet. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW along the frontage of this site to provide 25 feet from the centerline. In doing this, they will satisfy the City's standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as required. SW 74th Avenue is currently paved, but not constructed to fully meet the City standard. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half- street improvement along the frontage of this site. The applicant's plans indicate that they will construct the half-street improvement as a part of their project. Water: This site can be served from the 12-inch public water line located in SW 74th Avenue. The applicant's plan indicates they propose to make two connections to the public water line. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 74th Avenue, but the end of the line is approximately 225 feet to the north of this site. The applicant proposes a southerly extension of that line to the south boundary of this site. There is also a USA trunk line located west of the site. However, access to the trunk line would be difficult and necessitate crossing the wetland and floodplain. If the main line in SW 74th Avenue can be extended southerly, as proposed, Staff would support that option. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 12 OF 18 Storm Drainage: Fanno Creek is located west of this site. The applicant's plan indicates that the onsite storm water runoff will be conveyed to the west end of the site where it will be treated and released into the wetland/floodplain area. The concept shown on the plan is acceptable. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant is proposing to use a product by STORMTREAT SYSTEM, INC., which incorporates a constructed wetland and sedimentation basin. The manufacturer information provided indicates the system will have a phosphorus removal of approximately 89%, which exceeds the USA standard. Staff recommends approval of the proposed system. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan and proposal, does not meet the Street and Utility Improvement Standards or the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, specifically those related to required street connectivity, street improvements and sanitary sewer service. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 13 OF 18 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has proposed a 10-foot x 20-foot screened enclosure. The applicant indicates that the franchise hauler method would be used and indicated that they had received approval for the location proposed. The applicant stated that an approval letter had been obtained and that a copy was included in the submittal package, however, staff could not locate a letter from Pride Disposal. A condition of approval is warranted for the applicant to submit a copy of the approval letter from Pride Disposal for the location of the trash enclosure. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, Staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the location and size of the facility is adequate, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building has been located on the site with consideration of the existing floodplain, wetland and water resources boundary. All existing trees on the site will be preserved. Staff has determined that this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 14 OF 18 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. The project site is within the 100-year floodplain, however no development is proposed within the floodplain area. The Fanno Creek Trail Study (March 1997) identifies a trail within the floodplain adjacent to this development. While dedication can not be required, an easement allowing future development of a trail in the floodplain portion of the site is appropriate. This will not detract from the buildable portion of the site and will not result in a loss of property square footage or use. FINDING: Because the development is adjacent to the 100-year floodplain and a trail alignment is shown in this area but no easement dedication is proposed, this standard has not been met. If the applicant provides an easement to enable a pedestrian trail to be constructed by the City in the future, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Dedicate an easement within the floodplain 30 feet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff Contact: Duane Roberts (x347) for easement language. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has offered no comments or objections in regard to the need for additional lighting or crime prevention features. FINDING: Because there are no concerns from the Police Department, Staff has determined that the Crime Prevention and Safety Standards have been satisfied. Public transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The project is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit facility, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because no bus lines run along the site frontage, this standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 15 OF 18 Provisions of the underlying zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for the purpose of manufacturing signs. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130.020.D.2.a (Use Classifications) as light industrial. The proposed light industrial use is listed as a permitted use within the Industrial Park zoning district. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table, the proposal fully complies with the exception of the front yard setback which the applicant has requested a variance to reduce to the proposed 20 feet. STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 2.78 acres Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 244.40 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 20 ft - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] N/A - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 257 ft Maximum height 45 ft. 26 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % 40.4% [5] Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % 37.9%[5] [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795 (Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] The percentages are based on the development area, not the entire lot. Much of the lot is covered in wetland and floodplain;therefore,the actual impervious surface is much greater than 37.9%of the entire lot. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: (1) Maintain 50-foot setback riparian zone — less than 50 feet at the west building face, sheet 1.2, (2) Post access signs 7 feet A.F.C, (30 Submit fire flow calculations to determine number of fire hydrants, (4) Provide a fire hydrant flow test report, (5) 2 exits required off 2" floor, maybe mezzanine also greater than 10 occ (60 Are NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022—MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 16 OF 18 there flammables liquids used or stored in maintenance area? Paint booth? (7) What are the 3 fire hydrants for?, (8) the open welding area violates 50-foot buffer zone. Staff response to comment #1 and 8: Staff referred to Sheet 1 .2 and did not see any encroachment into the 50-foot buffer area. There may have been some confusion of the line being referred to. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: (1) Backflow protection must be provided on customer side of water meter. Backflow protection shall be a minimum of a double check valve assembly. (2) Submit plans to Engineering for plan review of public water improvements (Fire Hydrant Installation) The City of Tigard Property Manager, and The City of Tigard Police Department have reviewed the application and have not provided comments or objections. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the body of this decision with one exception. The comments indicated that a sensitive area exists on the site and that the developer must preserve the area with a 25-foot corridor. This is less than the 50-foot buffer required by the City and, therefore, is adequately addressed. The Division of state lands has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: The wetland delineation is currently being evaluated by our staff (Det. #99- 0372) but has not been concurred with to date. Also, a removal/fill permit may be required for impacts to waters of the state from proposed development if impact exceed 50 cubic yards of material altered. US Army corps of Engineers has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: It appears a portion of the proposed project may fall within the regulatory authority of the Corps of Engineers. They provided an application for staff to forward to the applicant which forwarded on as requested.. ICI, PGE, US West and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 27, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 11, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Amu" Tecision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 1p3125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 17 OF 18 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . � �� October 25, 1999 PREPAR BY: Julia Pow Hajduk DATE Associate Planner NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00013NAR1999-00022-MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PAGE 18 OF 18 Jik OM Or no.O N,. I C L I III .-_,..... , z O I I N . .R.�- R I ,�CO.CKR.0...R ..• WIT.,rntt.N .IR 1. nh,No lea?II • I �' .. 0..0--. Ca fat R t0.u,�� rwonwn nr. LU I_ r.sf, I r0 `�' I _ to d Lil' Z \� I � r , N Z Z • ISO Vow.P•Y2/A EA \s„ _.,c..,,,,. lb\ ',1 ---• 1 . 11j �� �.A ,� I . . .I,■. .■a 3 i ID i �o f-■ .••..IMMEMIl ■•.. •U 1 in' I IIIIII 0.41241,WALL 0,174 104 b•••• b-• 1.0. .....•le...•..-.".M6 I I ' RI 1 1 i I• i r�rtR oue_m-1� I . { o �� 1 1 UM • vv.-cm•N:. :�,t , ' .r"�"'n°rweu.e....a� ��N I 1 I O• • renv • a d1 1 1 L t ��I 1 1 i I- ,_ op*ro,. • 1 071 1111111111. 111 I, • MM. I I _ .OYO_ . lK NV. . _ OfOta.nN , Al...1. • SITE PLAN t VAR I 999-00022 EXHIBIT MAP N MEYER SIGN (map is not to scale) BUILDING NIArRD ' la a- _r CITY of TIGARD IC { r l BONITA RD I ~ .w `\ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 7 IA VICINITY MAP 7 a g m SDR 1 999-00013 VAR1999-0002 e 5 v L L. _ - T _ MEYER SIGN x. SUBJECT' BUILDING ac ST m , SITE ==an ,` ` CARDINALLN ili . .:Nk-- ` NO GA 1. I NW.-,* ,_ 1 oterin iiiiie' REDWOOD LN ha.' 1 M.' 8'P e' II "MIMI , I r .I• - -v. •rimm♦��� 111 =8 �1���1�r .71 A a \ _,.• '� I I k I I Ili 1 N irCKABLE LN L0, r L� r� / ' o zoo .00 soo Feet x� f �n . . 1 � 11) ::::Teitgard C1 I__, ! (JI ix Q4 Amin w Information on this map is for general location only and ,- �c� should be verified with the Development Services Division. J I( 13125 SW Hall Blvd �1 11111 _ , - . _ _ 1 Tigard,OR 97223 .. DST J/ _1\ -- - - Iso3)639- 171 HI I I I I I I I T http:Jlwww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 8, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR EXIIIJT B Jim Andrews Nicoll Engineering & Const. Svcs. Denny Meyer P.O. Box 23784 7340 SW Landmark Lane Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97223 Portland Western R/R c/o Oregon Electric R/R Robert I. Melbo, President & General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany OR 97321 • A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -44: Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community STATE of OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) El NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDRI999-00013/VAR1999-00022 - MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING ___ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Narne Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ' NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:I I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) — ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council LJ NOTICE OF: (TypedICend of Noticel FOR: I l de No Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit 'B", on the B" day of September, 19'9, and deposited in the United States Mail on the r day of Septemder,1999 ••stage ■ iaid (-erso - repay=,• •'otice� Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befc a me on the day of 4c41-e--K- , 19 . -.+;, OFFICIAL SEAL / _' Z _Q,C 'l/C� •::; % DIANE M JELDERKS NO ,i ' I ; 0 0 E 1 - NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION No.32e578 My Commission Ex I-I : 9/7/36V__3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER, NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O � CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: September 8, 1999 FILE NO(S)/NAME: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00013 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT (VAR) 1999-00022 FILE NAME: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. LOCATION: SW 74' Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 22. 1999. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address a relevant approval criteria with s .;lent specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." rid VICINITY MAP Ell ri l SDR1999-00013 1•� ■ VAR1999 00022 NUlL I MEYER SIGN 1 SUBJECT BUILDING ( � SITE I CARDINAL W NM Ill ill I,i. =Era fp! *j am� mwer11a m w __,, IIItI ?aw g • • \II � =-111 i _ N ►: �R am '6E ■ EXHI B 2S112AC-01300 2S112AC-01500 RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 14905 SW 74TH AVE 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AC-01600 2 112AC-01601 SKOURTES JOHN&JACKIE TIG.'• CIT •F 17010 SW WEIR RD 13125 • L BEAVERTON,OR 97007 T •RD,OR 97 23 2S112AC-01700 2S112BD-00300 INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M 15065 SW 74TH AVE 11720 SW LYNN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112BD-00400 2S 112CA-00100 MALO ROBERT W/VIOLET MAY MALO ROBERT WILLIAMS ET AL 11720 SW LYNN 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-00200 2S112CA-00300 MEYER DENNY G&NANCY L RD Y OF 7340 SW LANDMARK LN 13125 ALL TIGARD,OR 97223 Tf RD,OR 97223 2S112CA-01300 2S 12CA-01401 HESS CHARLES A AND TIGA-` CI OF 7755 SW GENTLEWOODS DRIVE 1312 :11 -,LL TIGARD,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-01700 2S112CA-01800 SCHROEDER HANS HEINRICH KREICK JOHN E AND MARA 7725 SW GENTLE WOODS DR 7715 SW GENTLEWOODS DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-01900 2S112CA-02000 MILLER JERRY A&SUSAN R HINTON JANE F 7705 SW GENTLEWOODS DR 7695 SW GENTLEWOOD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-08700 2S112CA-08800 TAKASUMI RICHARD C&DEANNE L VALENTINE DARNELL 7556 SW ASHFORD ST 7546 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CA-08900 2S 112CA-09000 NESS J GREG/TERRY M HAWORTH MARK S/DEBBIE S 7540 SW ASHFORD ST 7534 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-09100 2S112CA-09101 QUINGE DARRYL F SJOQUIST W C AND HELENE M 7528 SW ASHFORD ST 7522 SW ASHFORD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CA-09200 2S112CA-09300 SJOQUIST W C&HELENE M TRS KISH ROBERT J/SUSAN C 7522 SW ASHFORD ST 7510 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 112CA-11901 2S112DB-00300 TIG•'s C OF PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 1312 . H• 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI ARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112DB-00400 2S112DB-00401 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 111 SW 5TH AVE#3400 201 MISSION ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 2S112DB-00500 2S112DB-00600 HUBBARD VIOLA I MEYER DENNY G&NANCY L 15065 SW 74TH AVE 7340 SW LANDMARK LN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112DB-00700 2S112DB-00800 WESTERN UNITED LIFE ASSURANCE CO JOHNSON ORVAL D& 15245 SW 74TH AVE 15515 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 JIM ANDREWS NICOLI ENGINEERING & CONST. SVCS. , INC. 9025 SW CENTER STREET PO BOX 23784 TIGARD OR 97281 DENNY MEYER 7340 SW LANDMARK LANE TIGARD OR 97223 • . - • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW " '"'µ'�i�tt' TYPE II APPLICATION i!4- -II? CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: mi, l DATE OF PRE-APP.: _ M Li Property Address/Location(s): 74m' Ave. . FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2.311 2013 - (poo Case No.(s): cbg "l_ er) Other Case No.(s): VAR /499'000:2%7 Site Size: 2.11 AL, No.: 'I9 . 3/701? Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: b•I;NN 0•( F• I=�¢.. Date: 7-2-0 - 9 Address: 7340 S.w. 4AI4,DM,4r.K-Phone: @SO- '2-a' City: T60.1a-p Zip: 9 7 22 3 Date Determirfd o Beffilete: Ai Applicant*: JIM 1�1�t3�2 444:, c 1LOU �N`b►6N7 1?�K61 Comp Plan/Zo e Designation: Address: -� P-D. 'o$ 2-31 5 4 Phone: to 2b-205(o !19 City:.— 1 l[a.4c(I;t:3 Zip: 91 Z.151 e ✓ CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 1:lcurpin\masterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ plication Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY f6R: h1lG.1-e12. 516,04 66, 11.41-• plication Form [Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site ID/Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): C. TlzuGT A 4 00D S. TILT-UP (#of� � (#of copies based on pre-app check list) GD 4c E - STly.tc-TU RE + Ac.SO o. SITE D- Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") I mpgovEMEh4T5 4. Fe ou-n' 1TV-t-i ❑" Applicant's Statement #of copies based on pre-app check list) Uonstruction Cost Estimate SA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) D--- ets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-St p ` GON4,T121AC-Ttot-4 LO'pi. % AP' D-0X. GOD,DOO `._ Legal Siz_eEnvelopes -1 tt I=1 Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 .1 ($100,000-$999,9991,.. x.,600.0) ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (t$5/$10.000) , 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: 12-1✓GzUgST III U A \/Al2-tk14GE OF >,=1zot-.r 1'f(t2-t 041") Ser 13/5.,c,k APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 1 Ci day of JU '.-`' , 19 &. Owner's Signature � Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 7 I F1j - CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ,Siaping)1(Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 12/26/99 FILE NO(S).: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR] 1999-00013 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT[VAR) 1999-00022 FILE TITLE: MEYER SIGN COMPANY BUILDING APPLICANT: Jim Andrews OWNER: Denny Meyer Nicoli Engineering & Const. Svcs. 7340 SW Landmark Lane PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97281 (503) 620-8200 PHONE/FAX: (503) 620-2086 REQUEST: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 14,000 square foot tilt-up concrete structure and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 35 feet to 0 feet. LOCATION: SW 74th Avenue, between SW Bonita Road and SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S112DB, Tax Lot 00600. ZONE: Industrial Park; I-P. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, REVIEW 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.800. CRITERIA: CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: 9/8/99 DUE: 9/22/99 © STAFF DECISION TENTATIVE DATE OF DECISION: 10/28/99 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP p NARRATIVE p TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARCHITECTUAL PLAN p SITE PLAN p LANDSCAPE PLAN p GEO-TECH REPORT DI WETLAND REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407 SDR1999-000131VAR1999-00022 MEYER SIGN CO.BUILDING LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: St 4 Lp FOR Date: B(Z1}q LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS I COMPLETE DINCOMPLETE WDING I Existing and proposed contours shown? `49 *31.. $-c:"J S Er Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes ©No Ig/ Adjacent parcel grades shown? STgEET ISSUES . Right-of-way clearly shown? MI Centerline of street clearly shown? © Name of street(s) shown? C Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? MI ' Profiles of proposed streets R■ft Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles -- 111 El shown on adjacent property? IAA El Traffic study required/submitted? El" Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? Check widths proposed on public streets A a/ Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ['Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES Er Existing/proposed lines? ❑ R Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATtt ER ISSUES Nal/ Existing/proposed lines? Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY ISSUES 1-- -. Existing/proposed lines? Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? Er Water quality facility shown on plan? does area provided match calculations for size requirement? Stubs to adjacent properties required? Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:tengtbnanrtmasters\public facility plan checklist.doc August 30, 1999 mall4tik CITY OF TIGARD Jim Andrews OREGON Nicoli Engineering PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Meyer Sign Building —/SDR 1999-00013NAR 1999-00022 Dear Mr. Andrews: Staff has received the additional envelopes, narratives and wetland report discussed in our 8-25-99 phone conversation. This letter is to inform you that the application has been deemed complete as of August 27, 1999 and has been scheduled for review. Staff has scheduled a tentative decision date of October 28, 1999. Please be aware that this is a target date only and a decision may be issued before or after this date. If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 407. Sincerely, 44*/411_ Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:\curpin'Julia\sdr1SDR99-13ACC(Meyer).doc c: SDR 1999-00013 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 61VN - . i2750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. z c o o p �n o �� P.O. Box 23784 LIFT Oo F ��RQUVSMDTTQ. ENGINE RIN+ Tigard, Oregon 97223 1'VV La. DwTE s .2 -91 oe NO 4- and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 ATTENTION, 0 a RE 1:7f2AAA;1.&..t.41 tiha.t.,±A4/11,,t4i. GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU El Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings O Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I1 L•24•91 itg ia2AILJ2--e-19 MI , 2 1 4A4a.C.ek ------1 1°11 7.1 ItletaAAPj P...et-R-AANA. :" i- Ale-12,1-.A"-g- 242-r-e_n_- P • i t" .. 02- • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints 0 For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 C PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: L 1 ,iiiir..iiiri-i■` ISAMMEIMAIIRIII !t!liiii!1iiNI i1I\111iI■k m1 11aumu■hMIIJ —iiililiiiliiiiiiiiiiri and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR: THE MEYER BUILDING S.W. 74th AVENUE TIGARD, OREGON TAX MAP: 2S112DB TAX LOT: 600 OWNER: DENNY MEYER 7340 S.W. LANDMARK LANE TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TABLE OF CONTENTS *SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM *PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DOCUMENT *PROPOSAL SUMMARY AND NARRATIVE *VARIANCE REQUEST *IMPACT STUDY *NEIGHBOR NOTIFICATION LETTER MAILING LIST SIGN UP SHEET FROM MEETING *IMPACT STUDY *STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION *COPY OF PRE—APPLICATION NOTES *REDUCED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY : JDA DATE : 6-21-99 PAGE OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: VVUe, DATE OF PRE-APP.: L-12*7(11 Property Address/Location(s): ]�{' 7 .vim FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2-51 121 8 - LpOD Case No.(s): 5D/Qq gq-00©,��,3�� � Other Case No.(s): Ugle(��g9-��!` :bs - Site Size: 2.7 Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: 77/A0 Address: 7 3 4 b S.W. LAKp e,y_.Phone: 420-82.00 City: 1Tv,,&p-r Zip: 9 7 2.23 Date Determine To Be Complete: Applicant*: JIM 1�N�'?��� a t�ILOLt �l tN 1� gl �c` Comp Plan/Z ne Desi ation: Address: P.p. t3.oX 23'7 8 4 Phone: Co 2,0-2-0b Co City: Zip: cr1 Z.Pb1 sr- * CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpinlmasters\sdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY f6iz: Iv( , 1146., ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site El Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): Co 'rZZ.0 c,r A, 141000 S, ❑ Site/Plot Plan N F Tt lT-U P (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Lot4G4 Te STtzt.Ec-TU t- A'.S.oc Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") IMPe-ovMEt�Ts 4 FPO LAVA" 11Et-C'j ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) GD Q 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped NhT Rt t GTIo� A�PR-oX• (Aviv DO Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000 4999,999)....$1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$1O,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: t2- Ca A VAI2-1/1oaGa OF T1-t 1 c T YA1/412rb ( i41") S C3/r;k APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 163 day of JU L`� , 19 41 9 I AL:id Owner's Signature / Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 S OF OREGON � � SS /,�' County cfVVoahingbon } I, Jerry.9.m-iannti, Director of Assess- ment and,jaX016n and Ex-Officio County Clerk for:saiclounty,do hereby certify that the withjnin'itrurrte.gpitwriting Was received and recCinfectifi;book of records of said $01/4).teer.i. qt$6'es6t)bht and Taxation, Ex- fficiopounty Clerk Doc : 98066173 Rect: 211068 351 . 00 06/22/1008 I0: 23 : 35am U k =~ °�» �� .. . ... ..... ... .. . WARRANTY DEED-STATU t ORY FORM Individual/Corporate Escrow Number: 1224854 Clyde W. Adair and Joanne Adair, as tenants by the entirety Grantor, conveys and warrants to Denny G. Meyer and Nancy L. Meyer, husband and wife Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon: See Attached Legal Description Exhibit "A". WASHINGTON COUNTY h ii "• REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX -'. $ 3o8. 00 G • 2Z. 9$ FEE PAID DATE c The above described property is free from encumbrances except covenants, conditions, restrictions, rights of way, easements and reservations now of record. t�1 U Z The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is $307,500.00 g 1 Dated this th day of June, 1998 ;if this deed is given by a corporate grantor,its name is signed by hs a authorized officers by authority of the Board of Directors. 4110/r Cly: Adair � THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY ai� DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF Joanr• Adair APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK � OFFICIAL SEAL WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING THERESA M.KILMER DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO NOTARYPUBLIC-OREGON DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR COMMISSION NO.056161 FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUL 25,2000 STATE OF OREGON,County of /�!A L(1 B w`v STATE OF OREGON,County of Personally appeared Clyde W. Adair Personally appeared end Joanne Adair who,being duly sworn,each for himself and not one for the other,did say that the former is the pros.A that the latter is the secretary of and acknowledged the foregoing their and that this instrument was signed on behalf of the corporation,by authority of instrument to be voluntary act and deed. its board of directors and is acknowledged to be its voluntary act and decd. Before me: June , 1998 Before me. Notary Public for Oregon / Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: 7/„? /cro My commission expires: Attar recording return to: t // STATE OF OREGON. Mr. and Mrs. Denny Meyer County of 7340 SW Landmark Lane I certify that the within instru- Tigard, Oregon 97223 y ment was received for record on the day of ,19 at o'clock M.,and recorded in book/reeVvolume No. ,on Until a change is requested all tax statements page or as tee/file instrument/ shall be sent to the following address, microfilm/reception No. Mr. and Mrs. Denny Meyer Records of Deeds of said county. 7340 SW Landmark Lane Witness my hand and seal of Tigard, Oregon 97223 County affixed. NAME TITLE. BY Deputy Form No.500-Computer EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION: PARCEL I: The North one-half of Lot 13 and all of Lot 14, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. PARCEL II: A part of Lots 32 and 33, DURHAM ACRES, in Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 14 of FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, a subdivision of record and running thence South along the West line of said FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, 244.4 feet to the Southwest corner of the North one-half of Lot 13 thereof; thence West along the Westerly extension of the South line of the North one-half of said Lot 13, a distance of 144.9 feet to an iron pipe; thence continuing West 22 feet more or less, to the center of Fanno Creek; thence upstream in the center of Fanno Creek with all its meanderings, 295 feet, more or less, to the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 14; thence East 15 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Wopo $ o. I// Varraii ve 1 1 Lik NICOLI ___ENGD,TEEpaqp and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086• FAX (503) 684-3636 NARRATIVE Project: Meyer Building SW 74th Ave. Tigard, Oregon The following narrative responds to the applicable code sections as outlined in the pre-application meeting notes of April 27, 1999. General Description The property owner, Denny Meyer, is requesting approval to develop his site located on 74th Ave. Development plans include constructing a 14,000 S.F. concrete tilt-up structure with a second story office area within the building shell. Site improvements will include paved parking / circulation areas and associated utilities / facilities. Mr. Meyer's company, Meyer Signs, Inc. will occupy the building and site. Meyer Signs employs approximately 12 employees. The majority of the employees work off-site. The remaining office / support personnel will occupy the office area and portions of the warehouse / manufacturing area. The warehouse area will be used for the storage of signage parts / materials for assembly later in "house" or on site. A paint booth will be used to finish some of the fabricated signs. Finished signs will be loaded on trucks and dispatched to job sites. The remaining area will be used for the storage of old signs that will be disassembled and scrapped. Section 18.360 Site Development Review This code section primarily outlines the intent of, procedures of applying for, and processing of development applications. It is understood that the application must be reviewed & processed according to this section. Section 18.370 Variances and Adjustments The applicant will be requesting a variance to the front-yard setback requirement of 35'-0". It is understood that the variance request will address the standards listed in this code section. Refer to variance request in submittal package. Section 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures This section establishes standard decision-making procedures used in the review of development applications. This application will be processed as a type II procedure. The project will include some minor trenching within the buffer zone. The work in the sloped area of the buffer zone will be performed per the code section 18.775.020,4,9. Section 18.530.0 Industrial Zoning Districts The proposed use is a permitted use within the I.P. (Industrial Park) Zone. The applicant is proposing to construct a 14,000 S.F. building with an approximately 3,000 S.F. first level office with the same sized office area on a second level. The development complies with the lot standards as noted in Table 18.530.2: Code Proposed Front Yard: 35'-0" 20'-0" Side Yard: N/A N/A Rear Yard: 50'-0" 257'-0" Minimum Lot Size: none 2.78 A.C. Lot Width: 50.0' min. 244.40' The maximum lot average of he 75% is required for this zone. The lot coverage of the development area within project boundary (see sheet 1 .2) is 75%. Section 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation The development is proposing to construct two access points to SW 74th Ave. Curb cuts will be constructed with the required street improvements. The two access points will allow easier vehicular access to the site and truck maneuvering on site. The two access points will allow separation between car and truck traffic too and from the site. A walkway from the proposed building's front door to the public sidewalk on SW 74th Ave. has been noted in the review documents; see sheet 1.3. Section 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards The only exceptions being requested is the front yard setback requirements. This exception is being addressed as a variance request. Section 18.745 Landscaping & Screening Street Trees: The two existing ash trees will be utilized as street trees, along with two additional flowering pears. Buffering and Screening: Special buffering / screening is required at the west project boundary line due to the residential area to the west. The project provides arborvitae hedge or chain link fence with sight securing slats at this border. Additional tree plantings are being proposed in the riparian zone buffer. Section 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recycling Storage A 10'-0" x 20'-0" screened enclosure has been incorporated in the development plan. The Franchise Hauler Review method is being used. A site plan has been sent to Pride Disposal and the approval letter is incorporated in the Site Development Review Package, submitted with the application. Section 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirement The development provides 31 vehicular spaces. Refer to sheet 1.3 for calculations. All parking, loading and manufacturing will take place on site. Three bicycle parking spaces are required. See sheet 1.3 for location and detail. Section 18.775 Sensitive Lands A wetland delineation report was performed for this project. The wetland boundary has been noted on the submittal documents. The development occurs outside of the areas which would be considered "sensitive lands" (i.e. 100 year floodplain, wetlands & riparian zone). The only time any work will be performed in the 50'-0" riparian zone is for the trenching of the 2" diameter drainage line from the water quality / detention facility. The line will discharge at the 100-year floodplain line and outside the wetlands. No landform alterations will be created by the trenching. "Rip-rap" (less than 10 cubic yards) will be placed at the fall out of the 2" diameter drainage pipe. The 2" diameter pipe size may change as the storm drainage calculations are further refined. Per code section 18.775, A-9, the work to be performed is an outright permitted use with no permit required. Section 18.780 Signs No signs are being proposed at this time. Section 18.790 Tree Removal No trees are being removed due to this development proposal. Section 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas A clear vision area of 30'-0" has been noted on sheet 1.4. Section 18.797 Water Recourses (WR) Overlay District The wetlands associated with Fanno Creek have been determined, delineated and noted in the submittal documents. No portion of the project, with the exception of the storm drain line, is being located in this buffer zone. Refer to code section 18.775 of this narrative document. Section 18.800 Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810.030 Street The portion of the site fronting on SW 74th Ave will be improved with curb, sidewalks and pavement. An additional 5'-0" R.O.W. dedication will be required to provide 45'-0" R.O.W. SW 74th Ave. Two driveway approaches (24'-0" & 30'-0") are being proposed along SW 74th Ave. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewer A sanitary sewer line will be extended to the site from an existing manhole North of the site on SW 74th Ave. (see sheet 1.6) 18.810.100 Storm Drainage The site will drain to a water quality / detention facility at the West portion of the project area. The applicant is proposing to use a "pre-engineered" system (see sheet 1.6 for details). The water quality facility will discharge at the floodplain line to the wetland area. The overflow line from the manhole will drain to a "holding pond / swale" and "sheet" drain to the wetlands if the storm event is severe. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways It is understood that a bike / pedestrian easement will be made a condition of approval. 18.810.120 Utilities The applicant will not be required to pay a fee in-lieu of under grounding, or under ground the utility lines do to the high capacity electric lines at SW 74th Ave. I1 FrINTIOIM E k I 1 and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 Variance Request Project: Meyer Sign Co. Building SW 74th Ave. Tigard, Oregon The following comments are in response to the approval process and standards criteria set forth in section 18.370.010. The variance request is for a reduction of the 35'-0" front yard requirement as noted in section 18.530.040. The reduction of 15'-0" to allow a 20'-0" front yard is being requested. 2a. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The front yard set back requirements are necessary to maintain / improve light, air quality, and sight distance along public streets. The applicant is being required to dedicate additional R.O.W. which will increase the street width. The additional R.O.W. dedication along with the 50'-0" railroad R.O.W. provide a total of 95'-0" of "open" space, which should provide enough area to maintain / improve the light, air quality and sight distance along SW 74th Ave. This request will not be detrimental to other properties along SW 74th Ave. The applicant is aware of at least one project where a similar variance has been requested and approved along SW 74th Ave. 2b. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; The site has an area of 2.77 acres. Approximately 1.57 acres are not able to be developed / used by the property due to restrictions placed upon the owner by various governing authorities, because of Fanno Creek and its associated wetlands, flood plains, setbacks, etc. There are approximately 1.2 acres of land, which the owner is able to use. These conditions are found only on properties bordering the Fanno Creek "basin" and not typical to all properties in the same zoning district. 2c. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; Proposed use is permitted in this zone and all other applicable City Standards are being maintained. The additional area being gained by this variance request will allow the property owner to utilize the remaining developable portion of the site to full economic potential. 2d. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; The setback reduction being requested will not impact any existing physical and natural systems. Additional sheet R.O.W. and associated improvements will still be constructed. The variance allows the property owners to use the remaining portion of the site while maintaining the existing areas defined as "sensitive lands." 2e. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The variance is being requested in order to alleviate the hardships imposed on the site by various agencies. The 100 year flood plain (Corps of Engineers), 25'-0" wetland buffer (U.S.A.) and the 50'-0" riparian buffer (City of Tigard) all restrict the property owner from use of his property. The variance request that the front yard setback be reduced, not eliminated. The request will maintain a sheet "zone" while allowing the owner to use the remaining portion of his land and the most economical advantage. The property owner is unable to use approximately 57% of his property due to various restrictions placed on the property by various governing agencies. The setback reduction will allow his business to function as required to provide employment and economic development in the City of Tigard, and still maintain the intent of the Community Development Code. Sincerely, c:!:Aa,,,....s...1— C,.,.z.L,,,.,, James D. Andrews ► 1 t _ . F and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086• FAX (503) 684-3636 June 8, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Meyer Sign Company and interstate Roofing SW 74th Avenue 15065 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR Tigard, OR Tax Map #2S112DB Tax Map #2S112DB Tax Lot #600 Tax Lot #500 Dear Interested Party: Nicoli Engineering and Robert Gray Partners are representing the owners of the properties located on SW 74th Avenue (see attached vicinity map.) The owners are proposing to develop their sites with buildings and site improvements for their associated businesses. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Wednesday June 23rd, at Nicoli Engineering located at 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, Oregon at 6:30 p.m. Please realize this will be an information meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We are looking forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 620-2086 if you have any questions. Sincerely, f James D. Andrews Russ Leach Project Manager Robert Gray Partners JDA:jh enclosures BONITA ROAV Q d 0 IX KING CITY Q %/jj = SUBJECT g SITES 3 m 0 DURHAM ROAD P ar 404- w IL IL 3 VICINITY MAP DURHAM SzTAX MAP NO. 251 12 AC TAX LOT NO. 1100 AND TAX MAP NO. 251 12 DB TAX LOT NO. 500, 600 R P F NICOLI OFFICE �</ 9025 S.W. CENTER S.W. CENTER ST o `5. . •ofA • MAP TO MEETING I I -� 1 - 1 '7. 01 I �S I 01.047,4/MIG 1N IO. •011 f1aTEY .i' , _ _I i _ + N) _ _- - _ ___ _ _ — AREA NOTIFIED•il _ �s _ = \ I (500')•ki\�')`ti - 1.`' .': X515. . ,.. -'':::_!;_-_.- - "•-::: _...: . _ -� -=_�'�-- --=--- --==- -- •-- --____ a.£_ :.�• ; . \ - — --1 I- (3) subject FOR Jim Andrews _: _ :- : _ parcels RE: Meyers Building•, 0, .11 _. :'_ _ . - _7 .. _. . . '1>�1'" " . _ - �" CARD' Subject Iffax Lots: . j. w_- , `, ,„ . ti rZS I I SAC1�D4 Z - ..2.....,...,_:.i....._ ��`� ti .�'� _ \ 2S I I ZDB 00500 00600 • en r.L. 0 Z '. MN. , J• : —— ''‘‘.- . at'''''. N, \ inannim 0 \ .. • y ..i..."\` _ '1 F' ____ wiMir_ '4qo ` � °'y z `ice \ 111 --� , `' �Z '1 - li „AO I- _, awwNIIM .. . = 5�1 REM Qryes'.!■ c ---• -- - • _ - \ ,� Mesa Main e- ' .' '}• ez, . I JTJI q -t. t - - - -- N•I - i 100 990 300 106 Baal• —j I I I I I I 1 r _ _ _ __ s.; -=- _ Q - - _ .. � 1 d KABL.E UV ,� ,µ .1Il. •rn —I---' f _ r .1. City ofTigt>d J _ ` 't5 LMdm.GOnan Nif mse Y for gr.ral fo1.xla�mFj anA _ ..—7�. - — , I I �t 5 Yiw11 h�,e�+1sd wh the D.v.bp+p�l8eivra.ONUOn. 'n ___ ... _ R _ —.I t Q �'�,�4t� I 11125.O HsII POW 7iperd.OR 97221 7 k 1s931s,sty, 11_► -- ______A:1— - 1 L'omrnunp Daveb 1 --__ -_--- -_51‘ CA, I myrrrw.w.et.P�d«... Y pm.n Plot date:May 3,11399;C:Imagk WIAGIC03.APR • 05/03/99 12:50 12503 639 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 12]002/003 r . l ) 2S112AC-01100 2S112AC-01200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES )(NHS DEVELOPMENT CO 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 03300-WMI 26262 S MERIDIAN RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S112AC-01300 12AC-015 RIVAS ERNEST AND ROSE PACT C R TY ASSOCIATES 14905 SW 74TH AVE 1 -• • 'EQUOIA PKWY#300-VJMI PORTLAND,OR 97224 -=•T1,AND, a- 97224 25112AC-0'1600 112AC-0 601 SKOURTES JOHN&JACKIE TI -• ► OF 17010 SW WEIR RD 131 HALL BEAVERTON,OR 97007 C-RD, - 97223 25112AC•01700 28112AC-02500 INTERSTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 15065 SW 74TH AVE 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH PORTLAND,OR 97224 OMAHA,NE 88102 231 12BD-00300 2 11250-00400 MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M MAL O T W!VIOLET MAY 11720 SW LYNN 1172 YNN TIGARD,OR 97223 ,OR 97223 125D-00500 ,2S112CA-001.00 MAL OB W AND VIOLET MALO RgarRT WILLIAMS ET AL 11720 YNN 11720 SW LYNN RD,OR 223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CA-00200 2' 12CA•• :•• MEYER DENNY G&NANCY L TIG•-.• OF 734C SW LANDMARK LN 131 L TIGARD,OR 97223 -D,OR 9 -••3 2$112CA-01300 ¶120A-01 0 HESS CHARLES A AND TIO OF 7755 SW GENTLEWOODS DRIVE 1312 L TIGARD,OR 97224 T D.OR 3 251120A-01700 2S1120A-01800 SCHROEDER HANS HEINRICH KREICK JOHN EAND MARA 7725 SW GENTLE WOODS DR 7715 SW GENTLEWOODS DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25112CA-01900 2S1 12CA 02000 MILLER JERRY A&SUSAN R HINTON JANE P 7705 SW GENTLEWOOOS DR 7895 SW GENTLEWOOD DR TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 05!03/99 12:50 1315O3 69.1 7297 CITY OF TIGARD Z003/003 • (p5 ' or.:4 ) 2S112CA-D270C 29112CA-08600 TAKASUMI RICHARD C&DEANNE- VALENTINE DARNELL 7568 SW ASHFORD ST 7546 SW ASH=ORD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 T:GARD,OR 97224 281 12CA-0890C 23112CA-09000 NESS J GREGr'ERRY M HAWORTH MARK S/DEBBIE S 7540 SW ASHFORD$T 7534 SIN ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 -IGARO,CR 97224 25 1 i 2CA-09100 25112CA-09101 QUINGE DARRYL F SJOQUIST W C AND HE_ENE M 7525 SW ASHFORD S'• 7522 SW ASHFORD TIGARD,OR 97224 —IGARD.OR 97224 25112CA-09200 2S112CA-09300 S.:OQUIST W C&HELENE M TR$ KISH ROBERT JISUSAN C 7522 SW ASHFORD ST 7610 SW ASHFORD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S, 11 2511 200-00300 TIG OF PACIHC REALTY ASSOCIATES 131" SW HALL 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#3C0-WMI GARD,OR 57223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2611203-00400 2811206-00401 OR-WASH ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 111 SW 5T1-I AVE 43403 201 MISSION ST PORTLAND,09 G7204 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 2511208-00500 2S112DE-00600 I-U9BARC VIOLA MEYER DENNY G&NANCY 15065 SW 74TH AVE 7340 SW LANDMARK LN PORTLAND,OR 47224 TIGARD.OR 97223 25112DB-00700 2S11206-00800 WESTERN UNITED LIFE ASSURA."CE CO JOHNSON ORVAL C& 15245 SW 74TH AVE 16615 SW 74TH TIGARD.OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2D9.00900 SOUT '. ' 'CIFIC TRANSPORTATION 17s. 'l-N • T 10TH FLOOR SOUTH - AHA,NE 6811 • ?S112AC-01100 2S112AC-01300 2S112AC-01600 'acific Realty Associates Ernest& Rose Rivas John &Jackie Skourtes 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy 14905 SW 74th Ave. 17010 SW Weir Rd. #300-WMI Portland, OR 97224 Beaverton, OR 97007 'ortland, OR 97224 2S112AC-01700 2S112BD-00300 2S112CA-00200 iterstate development LLC Robert&Violet Malo Denny& Nancy Meyer 5065 SW 74th Ave. 11720 SW Lynn 7340 SW Landmark Ln. ortland, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 ?S112CA-01300 2S112CA-01700 2S112CA-01800 :harles Hess Hans Heinrich Schroeder Jerry& Susan Miller 7755 SW Gentlewoods Dr. 7725 SW Gentlewoods Dr. 7705 SW Gentlewoods Dr. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 2S112AC-01200 2S112AC-02500 2S112CA-00100 KNHS Development Co. Southern Pacific Trans. Robert W. Malo ET AL 26282 S Meridian Rd. 1700 Farnam St. 10th Fl. S. 11720 SW Lynn Aurora, OR 97002 Omaha, NE 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 2S112CA-01800 2S112CA-02000 2S112CA-08700 John &Mara Kreick Jane Hinton Richard & Deanne Takasumi 7715 SW Gentlewoods Dr. 7695 SW Gentlewoods Dr. 7668 SW Ashford St. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 2S112CA-08900 2S112CA-09100 2S112CA-09000 Greg/Terry Ness Darryl Quinge W C& Helene Sjoquist TRS 7540 SW Ashford St. 7528 SW Ashford St. 7522 SW Ashford St. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 2S112DB-00400 2S112DB-00500 2S112DB-00700 OR-Wash Enterprises Ltd. Viola Hubbard Western United Life 111 SW 5th Ave. #3400 15055 SW 74th Ave. Assurance Company Portland. OR 97204 Portland, OR 97224 15245 SW 74th Ave. Tigard, OR 97224 ' 25112CA-08800 2S112CA-09000 2S112CA-09101 Darnell Valentine Mark/Debbie Haworth W C& Helene Sjoquist 7546 SW Ashford St. 7534 SW Ashford St. 7522 SW Ashford St. Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 2S112CA-09300 25112DB-00300 2S112DB-00401 Robert/Susan Kish Pacific Realty Associates Catellus Development Corp. 7510 SW Ashford St. 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy. 201 Mission St. Tigard, OR 97224 #300-WMI San Francisco, CA 94105 Portland, OR 97224 2S112DB-00600 2S112DB-00800 Denny& Nancy Meyer Orval Johnson 7340 SW Landmark Ln. 15515 SW 74th Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Meyer Signs / Interstate Roofing Sign-in Sheet Name Address one 5 � -�c�! pa x�e. l� l<c e 14-f 1r4 0 5 & /�.o so.r e ,L of ) 570-5637 6 2 4f 6/rle L �. -�KAA ,1, a n. Aix 5 �a ,� 0� gizZZR (. 3) � o -765o 4f't Cb. -Ate -7337- gazi2t Lain 1J,& ( ) / f7i1 ( ) Pekers'Jr, ks,z-s ft•O^ �.�d ( ) 4Z4-[ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) The Haworth's Mark, Debbie, Heather, Taylor, Kaftlyi 7534 SW Ashford St. 2idard, Oredou 97224 (503) 624-2032 Mr. James Andrews Project Mgr. Nicoli Engineering and Const. Serv. Inc. P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Or. 97281 6(11(99 RE: Meyer Sign Er Interstate Roofing development Mr. Andrews: Thank you for inviting us to participate in a planning review for the above project scheduled fortune 23rd. I am, unfortunately, going to be out of town and can therefore not represent our family at that time. I am interested, however, in learning about the project which is taking shape behind our house. I would appreciate receiving any material ie: maps, meeting minutes etc. which you could provide so as to keep us informed. I would also endeavor to make future meetings should I be able to, I believe we have other neighbors as well interested in your proposed plan. Thank you for your kind consideration of my request. Sincerely, f Mark Ha, orth Er Family Sewer System: The public sanitary sewer line is located to the North of the site in SW 74th Ave. The 8" line will be extended to the site. The on site line from the building will connect to the extended main line. See sheet 1.6. Water System: There is a 12" diameter waterline in SW 74th Ave. which the project proposes to connect to for both hydrant and domestic water lines. The business does not involve any processes that require water as a process or byproduct; therefore, water usage will be typical for the building size and fixtures. Impacts will be minimal. Sensitive Lands / Fanno Creek: The Project is adjacent to Fanno Creek and is subject to the Water Resource Overlay District requirements (chapter 18.85). All structures and site improvements are located outside the riparian setback area, as defined in the ordinance. The only activity that will take place in the riparian buffer will be the trenching and filling for the placement of the storm drain line and the "rip- rap" at the outfall. The outfall and "rip-rap" will not be within the floodplain or wetland boundary and will have no impact on these sensitive areas adjacent to Fanno Creek. There will be no impact to the public system with the proposed water quality facility. Noise: No adverse sounds / noise will be produced by operating this facility. Summary: This facility has little impact on the City's system. The major impacts will be on the water, sewer and traffic systems. The water line will be extended to the site, which will help mitigate any impacts to these public systems. The existing meter sign company is located inn Tigard; therefore, no new traffic will impact the city's system. The required sheet, curb and sidewalk improvements will help offset any impacts on the public transportation system. Technical Data for STORMTREATTM SYSTEMS, INC. STORMTREATTM SYSTEMS, INC. Sextant Hill, Unit 1 90 Route 6A Sandwich, MA 02563 Telephone: 508-833-1033 Facsimile: 508-833-3150 FACT SHEET- ATTENUATION OF POLLUTANTS WITHIN THE STORMTREATTM SYSTEM The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM,INC. (STS) combines well documented methods of pollutant attenuation within both the sedimentation basin and constructed wetland. A brief description of each of these processes follows. 1.0 SEDIMENTATION BASIN The majority of stormwater contaminants are associated with particulates which are carried as suspended solids with runoff. Extensive literature has demonstrated that pollutants such as phosphorus, metals and organic compounds are adsorbed to sediment particles (Harper et al. 1986, ABAG 1986, Hickok et al. 1977). Gersberg et al. (1984) determined that 97% of zinc and 99% of copper and cadmium were found to be adsorbed to sediment particles. Adsorption occurs through three processes: 1) electrostatic attractions, 2) physical attractions (e.g. Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding) and 3) chemical reactions. The concentrations of suspended solids in stormwater occur over a broad range and are very dependent upon local watershed conditions. A study of six highway runoff sites throughout the United States reported a range in suspended solids of 4-1156 mg/L with a mean concentration of 261 mg/L (Smith and Lord, 1990). Median concentrations for suspended solids in stormwater runoff from various land uses are presented in Table 1 below. Table 1 Median Concentrations of Suspended Solids by Land Use Residential 101 mg/L Mixed 67 mg/L Commercial 69 mg/L One of the principal mechanisms for removing suspended solids within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is settling within the sedimentation basin. The efficiency of this process is largely dependent upon particle sizes of suspended solids and their associated settling velocities. The distribution of particle sizes found in highway runoff was determined by wet sieve analysis and is presented below in Table 2 (Rexnord, Inc. 1984). Approximate settling velocities of various particle sizes are presented in Table 3 (U.S. Department of Agriculture 1981). STORMTREAT`'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 1 Table 2 Wet Sieve Analysis of Highway Runoff Composite Samples Particle Size (gm) % of Suspended Solids >250 6.45 88-250 6.02 44-88 9.08 <44 78.45 Table 3 Approximate Settling Velocities for Sediment Particles mm gm type of particle settling velocity 0.5-1 500-1000 coarse sand 15-20 ft/min. 0.25-0.5 250-500 medium sand 2-10 ft/min. 0.08-0.1 80-100 fine sand 30-80 ft/hr. 0.002-0.05 2-50 silt 1-2 ft/hr. <0.002 <2 clay 0.005-0.01 ft./clay Source: U.S.Department of Agriculture,1981 The amount of time for this settling of particles to occur is determined by the retention time of stormwater within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM. Two retention times are applicable: Phase 1 - that which occurs within the sedimentation basin as the tank fills (and begins discharge to the surrounding wetland) and Phase 2 - that which occurs after the basin is filled. Phase 1 - The average intensity storm for the Northeastern United States is 0.05 inches/hour (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1986). At this rate, one-half inch of runoff (300 cubic feet per STS tank) will be collected over a period of 10 hours. This represents an average inflow rate of 0.5 cubic feet/minute (3.74 gallons/minute) and an average retention time of 320 minutes (5.3 hours). Phase 2 - The average holding time within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is 5-10 days. This is determined by the permeability of the wetland substrate and the outlet control valve. According to this information, the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM sedimentation basin will be effective in attenuating a significant portion of the suspended solids. The average retention time of 5.3 hours during Phase 1 (the tank filling) will allow for the settling of silt, sand and gravel-sized particles. This is consistent with the findings of Randall et al. (1982) which indicate that settling times as short as 2 hours are adequate to remove 55-85% of fine suspended sediment (sizes 15-35 microns). STORMTREAT'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 2 Additional settling of fine particles will occur during Phase 2, the 5-10 days following the storm event, when the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM filters the water through the wetland substrate. Many of these finer particles are believed to be organic in nature. Randall et al. (1982) also indicated that 6-35% of the organic matter is contained in the 15-35 micron size range particles. The remaining 65- 94% organic matter is therefore assumed to be associated with very fine particles which will migrate into the STS wetland system. A series of six bulkhead walls within the central sedimentation chambers function as filters by employing synthetic screening and woven geotextile filters between each of the sedimentation chambers. These filtration bulkheads enhance the sedimentation of the silt, sand and gravel size particles within the sedimentation chamber. The last chamber in the sedimentation basin is constructed with inverted elbows to function as an oil and grease trap. 2.0 CONSTRUCTED WETLAND The STS constructed wetland is unique in that all of the discharge into the wetland occurs subsurface. This subjects all of the stormwater to treatment within the wetland soils and root zone where the most efficient attenuation of pollutants occurs. This pollutant attenuation occurs by a variety of processes including filtration, adsorption and biochemical reactions. 2.1 Filtration The very fine particles (including bacterial cells) which pass through the final sedimentation chamber enter into and are filtered within the wetland substrate. A recently completed study of septic systems for the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation indicates that bacteria (and other similarly-sized organic particles) are filtered within a distance of 10 feet of leaching fields placed in sand (Ayers & Associates, 1993). In that the STS wetland system is 25 feet in length, the removal of bacteria is very efficient. 2.2 Oxidation The Ayers study also summarizes several other researchers efforts regarding the fate of organic particulates within sandy soils receiving septic effluent. This research suggests that one of the most effective methods for decomposition of these organic deposits within the sand filtration medium is dosing (or alternating) of septic leach fields providing for the periodic aeration of soils and the oxidation of organics within the soil. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM provides a similar environment through the fluctuating water levels within the wetland soils. As the system empties following a storm event, air is drawn down into the soil column by the declining water table. In this manner the soils are STORMTREATT'°'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 3 aerated providing an optimal environment for the decomposition of organic particulates within the soils. 2.3 Adsorption Those pollutants which occur in a dissolved state will pass through the sedimentation basin and into the constructed wetland. Adsorption of these pollutants onto the surfaces of the soil particles within the wetland system is a principal mechanism for the removal of pollutants. The literature suggests that pollutants such as phosphorus, dissolved metals and organic colloidal pollutants (Harper et al. 1986;ABAG 1986; Hickok et al. 1977). Adsorption occurs through three main processes: 1) electrostatic attractions, 2) physical attractions (e.g. Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding); and 3) chemical reactions. In an experimental constructed wetland, Gersberg et al. (1984) showed that 97% of the added zinc and 99% of the added copper and cadmium were removed. 2.4 Precipitation Precipitation of metals and phosphorus within the wetland soil matrix is another mechanism for attenuation within the constructed wetland. Metals such as cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc form insoluble sulfides under reduced conditions commonly found in wetland soils (Benforado, 1981). Fulvic and humic acids released by decaying organic matter can form complexes with metal ions. Phosphorus precipitates as a ferric complex under oxidizing conditions. 2.5 Biochemical Reactions within the Constructed Wetland Constructed wetlands have shown promising results with regard to the treatment of stormwater pollution. The majority of the biochemical reactions which serve to attenuate pollutants occur within the subsurface (root zone) of the wetland. Most notably, the process of denitrification is accomplished by bacteria associated with the plant roots under anaerobic conditions. Such conditions occur as partially-treated stormwater flows through the wetland soils and the biochemical oxygen demand consumes available dissolved oxygen. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is unique in that all of the stormwater flows into the subsurface of the wetland. Commonly the opposite is true (surface inflows) for more conventional constructed wetlands. STORMTREATT"SYSTEMS, INC. Page 4 3.0 REFERENCES Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 1979. Treatment of Stormwater Runoff by a Marsh/Flood Basin. Interim Report. Benforado,J. 1981 Ecological Considerations in Wetland Treatment of Wastewater. In Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management,June 17-19, 1981. Edited by B. Richardson. pp. 307- 323. St. Paul, Minnesota. Gersberg, R.M., S.R. Lyon, B.Y. Elkins, and C.R. Goldman. 1984. The Removal of Heavy Metals by Artificial Wetlands. EPA-600/D-84-258. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma. Harper, H.H., M.P. Wanielista, B.M. Fries, and D.M. Baker. 1986. Stormwater Treatment by Natural Systems. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Report 84-026. Hickok, E.A., M.C. Hannaman, and N.C. Weck. 1977. Urban Runoff Treatment Methods. Volume 1 - Non-Structural Wetland Treatment. EPA-600/2-77-217. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,Wayzata,Minnesota. Rexnord, Inc. 1984. "Source and Migration of Highway Runoff Pollutants",Vol. 3, Research Report prepared for the FHWA, FHWA/RD-84/059, NTIS PB86- 227915. Smith, D.L. and Lord, B.N. 1990. "Highway Water Quality Control - Summary of 15 Years of Research", Transportation Research Record, No. 1279,Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1981. "Soil Survey of Porter County, Indiana", USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. "Methodology for Analysis of Detention Basins for Control of Urban Runoff Quality", EPA 440/S-87-001,U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. STORMTREAT."SYSTEMS,INC. Page 5 FACT SHEET- HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVELS In some areas where the STS is utilized, high groundwater may occur. High groundwater refers to shallow depths to the water table (or the top of the saturated zone). These conditions commonly occur during the spring months after a long period of winter precipitation during which evaporation and transpiration by plants (collectively known as evapotranspiration) is minimal. High groundwater level conditions commonly result in the failure of leaching systems (for both stormwater and septic disposal)by inundating the leaching facilities and causing these systems to hydraulically fail. In wetlands (or hydric soils) the water table may be at or very near to the lands surface for extended periods of the year. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM effectively handles high groundwater conditions. First it is designed to withstand the hydrostatic pressures created by saturated soils surrounding the tanks. This is largely due to its internal bulkheads which provide dual function as filtration walls and as structural. members which distribute external stresses throughout the structure. Because STS is not dependent upon an external leaching facility its effluent can be piped to a remote downgradient discharge area. Alternatively, in areas where the high groundwater conditions are likely to be short term (days), the STS holding time of 5-10 days will accommodate the storage and treatment of stormwater during the period following the precipitation event while high groundwater levels subside. A special case of high groundwater may exist in coastal areas where groundwater levels are influenced by tidal fluctuations. In most cases this is limited to distances of tens of feet from the shoreline, up to approximately 100 feet in unique instances. In these cases STS employs a check valve which allows discharge only during mid to low tide conditions. The effluent flow valve is adjusted to allow higher than normal flow velocities during mid to low tide conditions to maintain an overall average holding time of 5-10 days. STORMTREAT' SYSTEMS,INC. Page 6 POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFECTIVENES - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMPs Fecal TSS TN COD Pb Zn Coliform Infiltration Basin 75 65 60 65 65 65 Infiltration Trench 75 60 55 65 65 65 Vegetated Buffer Strip 65 40 40 40 45 60 Grass Swale 60 20 10 25 70 60 Sand Filter 80 50 35 55 60 65 Water Quality Inlet 35 5 20 5 15 5 Oil Grit Separator 15 5 5 5 15 5 Extended Detention Dry Pond 45 25 30 20 50 20 Wet Pond 60 45 35 40 75 60 Extended Detention Wet Pond 80 65 55 40 20 Constructed Wetland 65 20 50 65 35 STORMTREATTM SYSTEMS,INC. 99 89- 65 82 . 77 90 . , 94 Source: U.S. EPA,January 1993 Report 840-B-92-002 and Parsons Engineering,June 1996, Watershed 96 Proceedings. PRODUCT FACT SHEET: STORMTREAT 'SYSTEM I, 71 1 1\ ii1ii 1\ i„,,,\ ,a,„,..,,,, ,,. i Slotted PVC pipe g1: -4.. a ` .,.._±Z 0111 ill VICE4114...._- _Jlii.4 w- : Infiltration , _ C` rte- l '��r�1 �,,��� x' 11 ` discharge pipe � � y NA ) ., Constructed It'1 ilwetland Inflow from catch basin _Grit filter bag L/^�f ;SY1i?ill u'„••:� l/ =,I, h.-4, Outlet control valve -- - __ Skimmers Slotted PVC pipe Inverted elbow Narrative Description Il The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM, INC. is a stormwater treatment technology which provides high levels of treatment for a broad range of pollutants. It also saves space by reducing the need for unsightly detention basins. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM captures and treats the first flush of runoff which contains 90% of pollutants. An optional infiltration feature provides for the treatment of larger quantities of stormwater (beyond the first flush). The system consists of a series of six sedimentation chambers and a constructed wetland which are contained within a modular 9.5-foot diameter tank. It is constructed of recycled polyethylene which connects directly to existing drainage structures. Influent is piped into the sedimentation chambers where larger-diameter solids are removed. The internal sedimentation chambers contain a series of skimmers which selectively decant the upper portions of the stormwater in the sedimentation basins, leaving behind the more turbid lower waters. The skimmers significantly increase the separation of solids compared with conventional settling/detention basins. An inverted elbow trap serves to collect floatables such as oils within the inner tank. After moving through the internal chambers, the partially treated stormwater passes into the surrounding constructed wetland through a series of slotted PVC pipes. The wetland is comprised of a gravel substrate planted with bulrushes and other wetland plants. Unlike most wetlands constructed for stormwater treatment, STORMTREATTM conveys stormwater into the subsurface of the wetland and through the root zone, where greater pollutant attenuation occurs through such processes as filtration, adsorption, and biochemical reactions. Precipitation of metals and phosphorus occurs within the wetland substrate while biochemical reactions, including microbial decomposition, provide treatment of the stormwater prior to discharge through the outlet valve. An outlet control valve provides a 5-day holding time within the system. The valve can be closed to contain a hazardous waste spill. As an optional feature, when the water levels in the wetland reach a depth of three feet, it overtops an internal weir which directs the treated water into the surrounding fill and soils. In this manner, the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is capable of processing stormwater beyond the first flush. Specifications The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is sized and configured based upon the water quality design storm, the area of impervious surfaces and the available storage volume of preliminary detention. Generally 1 - 2 units per acre of impervious surface are required to meet standards. Treatment occurs off-line with a by-pass to accomodate the latter portions of storm events (which contain less pollutants). STORMTREATT'Specifications Diameter 9 1/2 ft Height 4 ft Storage Capacity 1390 gal Inflow Pipe Diameter 4 in Outflow Pipe Diameter 2 in Average Detention Time 5 days Average Discharge Rate 0.25 gal/min Units Required per Acre of Impervious Surface 1-2 2 Site Constraints/Installation Requirements ti STORMTREAT'ST'size and modular configuration make it adaptable to a wide range of site constraints and watershed sizes. It can be installed in any type of soil as the discharge rate is very low (1 - 2 gal/min) and the gravel filter/wetland substrate is contained within the system. As the flow through the system is gravity dependent, the system requires an elevation change from the pavement surface to a discharge point of at least 4 feet. Applications . 1� STORMTREATT"' SYSTEMS have been installed in a variety of applications, including commercial parking lots, industrial sites, town landings and marinas, transportation facilities and residential subdivisions. It is an appropriate treatment technology for.both coastal and inland areas, and can be used throughout the country with only minor system modifications to fit local conditions. Pretreatment Required? • The manufacturer recommends that a catch basin be placed prior to the STORMTREATT" SYSTEM in order to trap larger diameter sediments. Other detention facilities such as underground tanks, pipes and open surface basins can also be utilized to store the first flush upstream of the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM units. Where flood control facilities are required, the forebay area can be utilized as this preliminary detention facility. Performance To date, 315 analyses have been conducted on 33 samples which have been collected over eight independent storm events during both (New England) winter and summer conditions. Influent stormwa ter samples were taken at the entry point to the STORMTREATT" tanks at the catch basin. Effluent samples were taken during the five days following the storm event. The quality of the sampled effluent was then compared with influent and removal rates were computed. Test results are summarized in the table below. The system performance has been verified by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Strategic Environmental Partnership (STEP) Program. See our website for a full copy of the STEP report. 3 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTS-STORMTREAT'"'SYSTEM KINGSTON,MA Average Average Stormwater Treated Percentage Pollutant Influent Discharge Removed (%) Fecal coliform (noJ100 ml) 690 20 97 Total suspended solids (mg/I) 93 1.3 99 Chemical oxygen demand (mg/I) 95 17 82 Total dissolved N (µg/1) 3569 520 77 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg/I) 3.4 0.34 90 Lead (µg/1) 6.5 1.5 77 Chromium (1.10) 60 1 98 Phosphorus (µg/1) 300 26.5 90 Zinc (µg/1) 590 58 90 Note: Samples were collected by the Jones River Watershed Association in accordance with EPA sampling protocol and analyses were performed at state-certified laboratories. Maintenance The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM requires minimal maintenance. Annual inspection is recommended to ensure that the system is operating effectively. At that time the manhole is opened and the burlap grit screening bag covering the influent line should be removed and replaced; filters should be removed, cleaned, and reinstalled. Sediment should be removed from the system via suction pump once very 3-5 years, depending on local soil characteristics and catch basin maintenance practices. [Longevity The life expectancy of the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is 20+ years. The polyethylene is treated with a UV-resistant pigment. Secondary Beneficial or Negative Impacts In addition to treating chronic stormwater discharges, STORMTREATTM functions as a spill containment device by shutting down the outlet control valve following a spill. 4 Costs The price per tank for the STORMTREATT'" SYSTEM is $5,500 (quantity discount available).Additional materials required include gravel, PVC piping, and wetland plants at an average cost of$350-400/tank. Installation costs vary from $100-500/tank for new construction and $500-1500/tank for retrofits. Average costs per acre of contributing impervious drainage area are $7000- 15,000. Delivery Time STORMTREATT' tanks can be delivered within 30 days. Installations Over one hundred (100) tanks have been installed at the following locations: • Residential Road,Jones River, Kingston, MA • Shellfishing Area, Gloucester, MA • Sewage Treatment Plant, Greenfield, MA • G'I'E Laboratories, Waltham, MA • McDonalds, Hartford, CT • Clakamis County, OR • U.S. Navy, San Diego, CA • Mill Pond, Barnstable, MA • Rite-Aid Pharmacy, Augusta, ME • Elderly Housing Development, Auburn, MA • Crystal Lake, Manchester, NH • Residential Road, Rowley, MA • New England Sealcoating, Hingham, MA • Town Park, Ipswich, MA • Rite Aid, Manchester,Maine • Charlotte, North Carolina • Santa Monica Pier, Santa Monica, CA Additional Information Engineering design drawings (CAD) can be downloaded from our website. U.S. Patent Number 5,549,817. Manufacturer 5 Address: STORMTREATT"' SYSTEM, INC. 90 Route 6A Sextant Hill Unit 1 Sandwich, MA 02563 Telephone: (508) 833-1033 Fax: (508) 833-3150 Contacts: Scott Horsley Mark Nelson Website Address www.stormtreat.com 6 STORMTREATT' SYSTEM INFOCARD Stormwater Treatment Solution Complies With Water Quality Standards The StormTreat'""System meets ERAS recommended 80% removal of Total Suspended Solids (TSS). It can be easily sized to meet more stringent state standards in critical water resource areas. The StormTreat System removes a broad range of pollutants including bacteria, petroleum hydrocarbons, metals, and nutrients. Saves Space The StormTreat-System significantly reduces the need for unsightly and land-intensive detention facilities. It captures and treats all of the smaller (routine) storms and treats the first flush of the large (less common) storms. Therefore, flood control can be accomplished by using landscape buffers and/ or smaller detention facilities. Cost Effective By providing highly efficient treatment of the first flush, the StormTreat- System compares favorably with other stormwater BMPs on a per-acre treated basis. Low Maintenance Maintenance is simplified by standardized procedures and is limited to: a) Annual inspections (and replacement of grit filter bag) b) Sediment pumping once every three to five years using standard septic system pumper. Maintenance contracts are available. /', i Pent-nuts are removed to open man- ' 1 - i hole cover for maintenance purposes I ,� _; � 1 � l mil'�;^'(' 3 I -r ! Slotted PVC pipes infiltrate \ 1+1 ;a,r +� t� partially-treated storm water 7 Ij �� _��J ���t I rte`-= from last chamber into ` ., ` 'i ��q 4 J 10 constructed substrate wette ` �^ ► �. gravel substrate IIW- J . Stu. Vfr:� Water flows through Infiltration pipe IF 1 root zone of wetlands discharges treated water IV where microbes metabolize into adjacent fill b sods S petroleum hydrocarbons. ' G , nitrogen.and other pollutants Inflow from catch basin - /j yy Gn[-filter b<ig � � '� ✓ Plants uptake metals,and 'C? ({ - gravel soils filter bacteria,:. , , ___-z phosphorus and metals )yam . toiiiiii I imi Outlet control valve regulates discharge•<•;e !� 'normally set at 0.25 regulates and can be:.ose:: Series of 141 skimmers which in the event of a hazardous materials sl;tll Slotted PVC pipe Inverted elbow for transfer clarified water horn 3-4 inches exfiltrates treated trapping oil and below the surface of water to next chamber water to outlet other floatables StormTreat'°' System InfoCard The StormTreat' System is constructed U.S. Patent Number 5,549,81 7 of recycled polyethylene :� Storm Drain + t , tttt - ti011111l/f Overflow StormTreat° System Catch Basin n•nummnnnnnnmm11mnm nnnn MI LI y nunnunnuuninnnuunnmmi 11,1IPn 11111,:mm11umu Pr' /WI— ",, Backfilled Excavation Infiltrating Treated • . Stormwater Parent Soils Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Results of the StormTreat'u System Applications I'rrc enlacjc ,,vol ul l-,!11.„.111.. The StormTreat'M System's design accommodates varying site 0% 20 40 60 80 r configurations and allows installation in many areas where Fecal 97% standard techniques, such as detention ponds simply will not fit. Cdiform -- Total Suspended I Solids ' 99% —_— I Residentiar Chemical ° i • Subdivisions Oxygen Demand 82/0 Commercial i 1 -- • Commercial Total Dissolved g 77% Nitrogen n • Industrial Total Petroleum 90% •Hydrocarbon --- e/ Highways Lead 77% 1 i i • Reconstruction _--Chromium 98% • Habitat Restoration 111.1 ...... Lake Shores Phosphorus 90% ���■ _ _ t A► • Marinas Zinc 90"„ — ' - - _ • Parking Lots Note Data collected ove•a two-year period by clients • Maintenance Facilities Allibligh and analyzed by s:;:e-certified labs Various Applications of 5101mT'cat S.stc - -.+ y,+ Impervious Area Treated per Unit iC Soil Type Pollutant Removal Rate Pollutant Removal Rate t 80%TSS 90%TSS Kqv YSTMPIA V cn Sand 40,000 ft' 20.000 ft' N Loam 30.000 ft' 15,000 ft' H Silt/Clay 20,000 ft' 10,000 ft' STORMTREAT SYSTEMS, INC. II 90 Route 6A,Sextant Hill Diameter 9.5 ft Sandwich, MA 02563 Height 4 ft Tele: 508 833 1033 Inflow Pipe Diameter 4 in fax: 508 833 3150 Outflow Pipe Diameter 2 in This is recycled paper [ StormTreat'" Systems Tank Pent-nuts are removed to open man- hole cover for maintenance purposes 1 li 1 \ .. 1 i loh\ Slotted PVC pipes infiltrate A i' `\ice iii\ (� .��II le! partially-treated storm water .•� �� � � ��,t`J���I� �re from last chamber mnto I rr.:. ..--,,.. , +constructed wetland Wejakt ®IL\C�■: ; ,,,� 1 gravel substrate . - b 7ti ; �e ,P. : gi 44 0 • ui Water flows through Infiltration pipe /�linth. 5��01 off'. 4 a � ": : l / root zone of wetlands discharges treated water o. VII .b�fHi �:: : where microbes metabolize into adjacent fill & soils petroleum hydrocarbons, f ,� •�± nitrogen, and other pollutants d l p Inflow from catch basin '• Plants uptake metals, and G = �� ravel soils fiilte 9 r bactena, i!i® Z , phosphorus and metals• � le 7 �1 13,! /1ly�"ill � ��� i ;'r:.�' :fix:.a r kt.:. f`«:::;} `°::'if fit' �.±a$:u iti�:��:k,�;,,,7P% f '� Outlet control valve regulates discharge rate (normally set at 0.25 gal/min) and can be closed in the event of a hazardous materials spill Series of(4) skimmers which p Slotted PVC pipe Inverted elbow for transfer clarified water from 3-4 inches exfiltrates treated trapping oil and below the surface of water to next chamber water to outlet nthrr floltahlnc EFFRIFI D9,.111 I..I:M.1I;'el I011I4 and Gon•tructlon Service.Inc. keltCwl.Lad•PD1.Wit 1..4 9y.91723 New pep lit-U Rh pep 1IF.1V oxItam v v v v v v � v v 11, 11 PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP TABLE OF CONTENTS I1N9IW5/SUBMITTALS �� .� Minn PO aHRK.FOTVATp1 rar4,9aEOQY.c fnuo.aancai.me GPM,". n.cw.e Y M!lI019MMT1 VOLUM.PLOT TAM AND..nely010 01■63.4 MLR 77I 111.1921 ewcalamom 00.0.40.04 0444.0 ...on car orconcw .,a.o.®cot. a...q.1...a.e,,..... I v �,ti.1. comma zoom •Pl1.89/10.7.4 0.011.1701. Mat PIA" .• <.s on v Nmw ra.x L�T9*I i , SY M.APPLICANT WI IM101001.0 00.1.1C/ •OM acme Nees 1w...own 1.11•1444 .01.1.1. /1. OTINNIMINTO ANCCUOTO mew.:or nab NEW BUILDING FOR: AM''f.•� MEYER SIGN CO. t SW 7.th. MARI).OREGON 97224 oV.w Date 6-21-90 Scale Down by DL checked by JD. Job No.: 990404 Dewing No cove-0 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SET covER SHEET SHEET 0.1 `uiiu0uiiiil I .�4A�'I1:M:Il:L r... I I 1 I one Construction Srice•inc. LOT 14 1 1 I I 9�St Crab Simi a 61.BM mrY Mll ipal Oq.91f0 s 10'AIOER �_ ]S_OE a•ua 11 IM•• (7971 W-fl MEM VIP "'''N . . mmoim. mg.' ..m. A,JALk}.... _iy, g , PI DIM...a 7 r, ....„4(,...... k WIZ �� I _ DO,. LK MN. rl a a..,� �� p OH 1 I a.oa..a.� WI.o. I I 'Thallik... •,1Uee 619 �yl I 1 •'I • 1 ASH , �,�11 . \ I LOT 14 I I 1 •*.0.r.... I V lie / [ 1 1.1I AG ra ` OM., ; . S s. i I . I 1 1 _ — flit,' - .al • la•n�.r LW • I • ` I I • I 1 I 1 I / °°'•'O"^ N V2 LOT A II 1 Olaa•T.a Ac •lr I Wq a•YVIa'1 cMa�� I • . J a • I I N16ECi: • • 1• ` .l •o. 9.•w.l ,,. •.1I ••s•.. v G s �I�/� NEW BUILDING MEYER SIGN CO. 1 SW 74th AVE. .,,,,,,y j/ T19^ra Oregon 97224 SV2 LOT t3 I I Date 9-21-99 1- 99 ' 1 Scab I.n20. Drown 1, MG V SI RC PLAN-EXISTING FEATURES P•r1eE!F LA Job No, 990109 A94iq Ma: nu11.0-14 LEGEND EXISTING CONENT1ONS SHHT IN=► 11"131;e;i fra• tms i..Cs1.9M•PO.ea aim' iNt DNs 11223 ry._ •-•• s�e• CID a...va 7 694-0 , .� •Nwvrs ....: it/���1!r� 7� '" ... -:•i/ 1 f li, LT 1 i I ,;.77717/7.7.71 CI,, I it �\ . 1 I;11�,1 i I Ir/1 I\\ I �4 „1.'lul'�� 11 12511 11�I I / i �'so'"Im.anwIi1 crawl 1 \j \\\\ A u o1...N fiti .—� i X11 r 11. I I III o EMICEIMINEMINEMEIMINOOI P. Ill NIMMIIIINIIIINIMMI•11•••■ 11 .1411.04,10 4044:4014 I I . 11 I 1 Jl i I I I I . I E ' • � • r i i �� ;1 I E I / t yjr i �aaiorn \/ t �.�' / �I I !,;, -1 III ' f—so�Iw.e —__. .--. .—.1.11A1, I omit j ' NEW BUILDING Loaf rm. ExlMo I I MEYER SIGN CO. • • SW 74th.AVE. Orr 9 ,t"...4 1 TIGARD.OREGON 97224 ' Pw47 40444..∎ NI 401 u , 1 ' 1 ( Oalc 1-21-99 1 Sant 1'■20' Oros"b1 1210 ' CAad.e by. JDA Job No.: 990404 D,a.N9 No.: aIq-dev-P 7 EXISTING and PROPOSED CONDITIONS ME DATA E%6E?40 AND .n.,... PT,AC PROPOSED .o.a.oA.T.,r..— .0." COhpf1ONS SHEET 1 .2 0...F......:II..:"d!..•I T 3192-41. wE Construct..Services one. � ro Np'� I I I Sub St Cwt S5. •40.I 19N nA 1 i ' rwt mA erm j �y 4 j I�604~20% w-r -r i ra NO WAIN ------" — I.n,.un 1•02•••11 OM I WT Na wwtt Ir-.• =j� r I NW,MT WOW TO♦:n . 7 l- — uu, 0•11C11a ..o'''mK" it ... �.H I 13x1.,214.,..2... I t 1124 Kra malt Wolf, .o COAT.=—i d j H uE�. NM ili a1..e22 b122•.a,t I 111.2 11.01••2.IC.ARM 11 j M v, r--� r--i r i .1.00S-211. �112:30•321 U Leese...-..3.� \MALI 1.01111KIWt 1 111111 . . 2N..4 L.ec un OTTINFLON uvr•r 1120•■.. ■.'''"'■• •• •• H C 0111 1132.I ..... ,�sew.N ION ■■hF■■■■■■■■■■fJ■ �H. ,. F H j PER= I &N& H 111 1 IN • iffilefL.g3IMIVAltu.MU ' ' WI 01722022004 .•..✓••• .+. •0'�;_f i j 1 I•sageYrrwoba I C"� �n I I I L--J _ aye, -' , tj'•A MODOW f BICYCLE RACKS kn.:IMLAY „..,e.br I►I�? FIyN r�wrw®wcrtwu j _ _ - ....... . . • H NI �ocvm wart. III IllWOVE 1•022:20••112211232 t 1 — — — ------ u 1 a a a'--L ,a•1111.1111123•1111.1111123.. ...VOW a a — lA'. F 1111 •. NMI I I I I;111/1 I PRIMO: NEW BUILDING rRRMEYER SIGN CO. q rn.na,a• w r j 1 1 SW 74th.AVE. nraenw--I ; I , 114MO.OREGON 97224 b +,aN� I I I 1 1 .+1. j�"� Oelc 6-71-99 7 SITE PLAN Draw.by DAM -.'-o• CTSde.b7 Job Nv 993404 Drawing No.: tIe-P SITE DATA DEVELOPMENT DATA 2,.4 . gi,.� - .w n .,....�.. BRE DEVELoPAENT'..t w.. �. .«u ,..., PLAN �•�• SHEET 1 .3 .mow ouaM I Al.41 I'f R.1%:M:11,14.If!IV 4.1t\ .N.e 6•YOA.n w..e de+.e OA.1.404 t Inc. • . I Yd S,.n..so.wn Srwce.N •i(w!NlM...,..,... . . . . . ..:.M..?M!... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "11A h.�o�+a+r'P6rure. ® ..�, .. w�•+ GRIMM o.o.a w1 -'d I �: PIWACC l419 run. + NM (54 61•1016 r + ANNA.. ,►#I+H I (AC pmt w-301 Otis ia °I.""�1 ' WA. • - ail ' e.INM1+... • \ lu I I c `H ° .u. I I it e1 M■\UUUuUu•■■I•■ Ills; lite j WAWA a OEM..:.:I.:AL it..:.... 'N 17,1•672.0CLOPORE MI.,' rr..�.a WI WM,I Ll,... I NNN..10 �l • . 0 Is wt ttl•AR wt.rjhelP.1 W ..1� ..iW • 'aA I .. 1 IlOOARNO PAP OP PPTom:.:,= .. _ -p ,-' +». ...x �..�. ..r i 1 N ' MEYER SIGN CO. BUILDING PLANTING SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES ncARD PLANTING SCHEDULE OREGON WV pa... n ....e ..mow, rN.. PIP.LaL.e TWO. mow. 1 ro..oa.,o.a a1 COPPIC,.or.caner on WNW..Ana Nano .r..:.. Dolt 6-n-96 • ® M...,a.00. v..e.o .L ,. w.L�..w.o...i..n.�'.0.,..o..c.o. ".row �..�®..,.w P.on. • .m..m...,..r.. iw cr sca. N zo r POP +e1 ay.,..c.ae WALL n.o..x .7.r wow u..n e• I- u r.m..o.OP,ILO v.aurr..l..o,w Pa.KAM.ATOM. W.w•m er..o.o.a...m..,.e .uKrrwae a�aa.a e� • .yly, oawr re •MP r wow .IP.PPP r r.a.®MP as r •.e.w.na AT nrrw.m. a'i wao.e.r �new 6 '�� r . ALO a PTILLE�.. r wr rxee.r waw (.b 0U:K. 40P TO IN 146.00TRILLA PIMP MI TOP ATWAIR TO el WIPP OP TO COPPLICTIP ITEM W.WNe..r KC.. 10 OP WALL Y ruWA..n a PAP..1e.wvl..a.o n... • ® 1(VP aarw.•wow `.iAUw.m 11I•Mt.P.a M~W TIPP ..a1BAR wa n40n..nti . .eeo .e LAPPAPP•Pi•PPM rw.r..eo W•PPP Norm a rt.r.r.e PPP. �'•L r..Ke.. PP CALIPER r wow ALL LARCKATIO WALL 11.POPP,a,.e M.MtiMAL e.N1..IWK.Y. O...C10wR H • 7.OCCADIPAP ..YL CM r PPP A. W,.r.a'+..OAA•PAP'..,W e M MCP. V ALL PIP.PUP V. •W A.wL CO CPA* • • ......,..."..........A.,...P11 WY GALA.r WOW OP MAY 0 W 6001M 1G APO WILL WH• • fY _...Y.Y M TIP OPP OLIN C.AWO.1P M.I..e,wl.,.'.'W.oe.YL' IYI.'GALA.YWl1X MD •T ..IL.C.. 14 Wnw LANDSCAPE . • ...4_CAW r 01.14 PLAN .. 0 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .PAL 01...1 WqY. SHEET • .me....,...,.w.. 1 .4 IA A.7 a..IDual.a.1 '�. . I and cm.t,clan sawn..Inc. t,' i 1023 SOaP.ib�•10 la LW S -7 3" 11 i i Nor (SU)Yp101 Z. FAA (Sat)661-31.11 41411d:1-`�� i J � .,� i,:,\. s i��f. � � I I ! 4 lload. ,w _ I uy I � 1� i l � r r i O I 1 1 ' i i J i i d A■�■■■■F:pFi•■■gip H. i g ■I■■■■■�1■�■■■■■■Si�FL■• I REASONS q1q1 1 , IM'"" et Id,ii ' a� A I Z ' ,,r 1 ■ T1H )li V 1 u, s N BUILDI NG B a s ' ,1----1._,T, MEYER SIGN CO. t j SW 74th.AYE. I 1 MARI%CREGON 97224 -r 4,...../l 1 Ma 171-9D MO M I SWC 1".20' ID GRADING PLAN Paw by ..0A GENERAL� $ I-ECIE D Clacked by . MOW: 990401 __ MR Yn�u*a MIMI m.01 Td.EeaAn.c ......T Tm.TacrcN L.on Ln•u I AND__ a w GMnq Na: pade-P FAR TW.M.1.1.11.17.•.T•.0.0.. ems L.O tRla TO s!'ilM®MIL M car OVUM I GIIY . al CUM DAM PROP AAP.MN.Mk. RM. IYYI -• •W �'YYWTV 0ORD.. ,DM TO PIRLD imnbAe°°�uma•fN1 .rs I w KURROADA PRIVOR.I.RR MACRO of TO PLAN +..w ache,LAN L.NM WI..1110.000.. MAR Maw on.a.r Of�Fx� TYPICAL FEEAFWO WALL • C..11.•...W SHEET 1 .5 PEED.LAW ART POEM I\s,orOl.,� iiiiiiuliii EDP EWE , LEE I q.sn I I . :lA ml mammas r4,01IM and CO/ENVIED.S..4..Inc. I .I I Walt SM• w 1.311 - �^.^•�� Sad D4 11775 i -•`;° I ph.. (764 GFID{ IAt (764114-7131 LEI I I ` \ WE sL.t j �� 1 I • —--—--—--7-----------,_. ,--vac. cjat b•cr-- I.iiii Il i 1 {..•..ef.Mt..o..n 1 SrDRIIIkeAT`SYsTe11s.Inc. SyseiAeefian Sleet el StmmTreal system rank � • II b I a`w....•r...man l4 M11*..su..>. \ M j 1N A ,....,�...�' ,7''�... rm... M HI I El i \\ it.L.,.. • i 1 u 1 1 \ _L \loiii.,‘,10014i/4 , \.„:,) aocacy 'Ilk\1 ,• � :■ I xrosuxs ! 1 .% c°. II ^?`,r lcuowr1 L i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ I N j I �P.. 111 __ ■••••••••E•1111■■•■•■■111 I j j 1 II I r..t...,...„7:.............:—.,....,,j- '_.... —z.--,—.....:-,..1-1 i I :, T.DEC I ' FT.:" •M s..n ,..«,......... / � .l:t .ew j i• r I t MELEE 6ar.e ra AM ..... .-a_,.� .•a„� .um I 114 f rau Leu 1 ,�� • • I I CDT • Ht I 1 vi Wm.LM\ (rte.r.�:.., • / \ '114 PROM,....,,,.,, "� :-ter`.= � •w..._. 1 +-I _ �t I NEW BUILDING ern 1 ^° I MEYER SIGN CO. __ ..I j SW I AVE. -'------�------- •I TGARD.D.OREGON 97224 PROP®MATER O.MLIIY 1 DEIB711GN FAQlr7 I I Data 6-71-96 Serfs 1'-77 i I Ram by aA 7 Medd by FACUTY PLAN N.: 990404 Moo. I I R..Iq Ns: IadMre I 1 N!ME MEMO VP EOM Lei Ma � LEE IV EN PT TO .11•13,LOCATED now. FACLIIY PLAN a -a.- MIL ..o.L» SHEET TO a.O.. 1 .6 `-i:ul►ei i 9 lark 61 J61.U6.61P1 and Catatruction SwNC..inc. 6925 SI,J.9Y.1'925 w LA61 6M&T.Inn Plot lap 611-10/1 fa lap 1.94-NN 191/1111 uuI, 10 111125 3 Y 0 ■ .e....—rmww Nate P.P.P.cn.s.,.eo.ar.M. P • 1 gl Ro Y 6[64ESi • .. --...,,.. »om m...r.,.. i6a[cc NEW BUILDING F�O�R�: /� ... , - V J� s MEYER SIGN CO. .ON N..e„P. .e. - - -- ncARD,OREGON 's Derr 6-21-99 Scd. t/6'4-0. Awn by LA ... P� •- o r , r. .r • ..-.. r W t V. I Mr .. O. .a by Job No.: 990404 Droving Ns: A.-P FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN SHEET 2.1 .. .e. \ X1111•. 99... �•a a L. L. nI. Au. - a.M.~, ona ConWrucliun SwNw.Inc. _ 9@1 St WY Std•..°V MN .IIIIIIIIII. C3] (] tip-,iiiv°es:'.�,pp. mloc.9mt - M -'. RM. ,10-1011 w 01-30 §•k0-'v ssh1 !. s MALL_ W 1•M• *VON YIM.N...t. CO Wad. SOUTH ELEVATION I _ _ II l� RAMON& 1 VW IWW.AL H . NORTH ELEVATION w•nv Man MEYER SIGN CO. 74th AVE MARO,OREGON • • •• PALINIMI■ �__ __ _ _rte 6-71-29 jIIIIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ► ���M� �o o p o—jam scow, m" ° ® • o- MK .W etc OW". r�7. .MaJ .maa. j-ee+°ev r nJ '�"r.W.MO .4.010...W tK vsaa A Waving No, 4644.-P .:'erm.,:j.,,,,,,,ii•n . R � ■ [ Yer PWICWOR (—RIP WAWA.WW1 WEST ELEVATION ...W.....•. EAST ELEVATION.«n...... ELEVATIO SHEET 3.1 WeHaytc( De1'ermi victho tn avid pet i\e‘eacfi o in Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Meyer Signs Development Property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Meyer Signs Company of Oregon, Inc. Tigard, Oregon Prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon (503) 570-0800 August 10, 1999 SYMq Wetland Determination and Delineation for the Meyer Signs Development Property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon Prepared for Denny Meyer Meyer Sign Company of Oregon, Inc. 7340 SW Landmark Lane Tigard, Oregon 97223 Prepared by Caroline Rim Fred Small John van Staveren Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 9-1931 August 10, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 WETLAND DEFINITION AND CRITERIA 1 2.1 Regulatory Jurisdiction 1 2.2 Wetland Definition 1 2.3 Wetland Criteria 1 2.3.1 Wetland Hydrology 1 2.3.2 Wetland Substrate(Soils) 2 2.3.3 Wetland Biota (Vegetation) 2 3.0 PROJECT METHODOLOGY 3 3.1 Off-Site Research 3 3.2 Wetland Delineation Field Methodology 3 4.0 WETLAND CRITERIA DISCUSSION 4 4.1 Topography 4 4.2 Hydrology 4 4.3 Soils 4 4.4 Vegetation 5 5.0 WETLAND DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 6 5.1 National and Local Wetlands Inventory 6 5.2 Wetland Conclusions 6 6.0 REFERENCES 7 APPENDIX A: Wetland Determination Data Forms 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS) conducted a wetland determination and delineation on the Meyer Signs development property in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon (T2S, R1 W, Section 12). The site is located south of SW Bonita Road, and north of Durham Road, on the west side of SW 74th Avenue. The generalized location is shown in Figure 1. This report presents the definitions and the methodology used to determine the location and extent of wetland on the property, followed by a discussion of site characteristics as they pertain to the three required wetland criteria. The wetland delineation was conducted on May 4, 1999. 2.0 WETLAND DEFINITION AND CRITERIA 2.1 Regulatory Jurisdiction Wetlands and water resources in Oregon are regulated by the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL)under the Removal-Fill Law (ORS 196.800-196.990) and by the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The primary source document for wetland delineations within Oregon is the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (Environmental Laboratory 1987)which is recognized by both DSL and COE. 2.2 Wetland Definition Wetlands are defined'as"those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (DSL, 1995). 2.3 Wetland Criteria Based on the above definition, three major factors characterize a wetland: hydrology, substrate, and biota. 2.3.1 Wetland Hydrology Wetland hydrology is related to duration of saturation, frequency of saturation, and critical depth of saturation. The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as inundation or saturation within a major portion of the root zone (usually above 12 inches), typically for at least 12.5% of the growing season. The wetland hydrology criterion can be met, however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5%of the growing season, depending on other evidence. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 - 1 - '‘) )- ,,, I. `ti . y r r' ' 4 i � d• � Yft /� y 4, jr , I I .. i r '- .i•I • l; .7 , J :rte F� � p,,.y'"�,"•�' �' ▪ 7 • ' `� f 0• - r - ' / I/ •• j7:' Zai 3 ,07;�• ,0,.s4evio ,• t.• � '▪A cs� i .y ?� — ., is i7 8 i'26 f Cy f RI '0 i • ; II ,.A,rcif t .._.1'.. 4:1— •.--1/4:, H -��pi' -.. my. ;� ,,.A:,:, 7 / r ;• z, SITE ' •g, ▪ i ,1I I` •li 01 �p `; r 4 ,/, { T-.• r•' yyy .i y•rg; ' r, ,� fie x _ -4' ___ •,S k-;` t "0 , �- ,45r, goo• ;J � ,Q,;."4:1-."-:'..-.?/. :7::::',7%,.; .' '': ''ti; - II: - -' --.7=-..".;%-'-'",-,• li'' *. ,.7 • ,.-1',?r.; Fil• , 4, e ' . of .,_, , y,. 1�..' Y Sy. � - • � 'f i 4. w � iZ �v ft . . ...,▪,..E.,...... : .:_:.,.,,i.'t-_-`._....',,f1**2*“.., 77-'7:71"'747:r'- 1:,,. ------' '. ' '' 7 .! .'.'",'\tit-Iird , .'',.`-, 7'''',/,' ". . I rr- : (r.`3..4" , ( i ,- y ,.;,.t..,,.,.....,.., r „—. ° - ,. V''> � \ / .1•,...11:y a 4 , � 1� i , . 1iTr ?omT � ✓ 'e (x; f w i � 4;`.7.:,..-'4 ! l 3 r _` I1 s r ; C7 ii ,/ �'�L F+4 `z..�• l t A { ' .1 f ti iAll s. ti Gp.a ° �RD I a _ '' - n- T• ode 10 L`ti`s j t.f J • • d ��� r (?x '1,,. t`{ '. °tP(j ...... `3 r [1 T U A '+�1 l N ' o �` <� ruff stJnt k. " ,�. •i ara Mfr ''1 r w r tsfab �a; �,/j ,Cra , X Cern • CObi�2r Yc�CL�Je P+4!!t i- • r ', rst 'PACIFIC ��" '' 11.11176T % 'ti i ,,,-- „ , ',1 �'M c :1_/3./..• ,s` s "� �iS' Lry 23 • , .'n`. ■ c.°: 4 BhSwwx"S 1 ' f 9.. rig. 8/4/99 9-1931 Figure 1. Location and general topography of the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (U.S.G.S., Beaverton, OR, 7.5 minute quadrangle, 1961 photorevised 1984). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. F!r! J' The growing season is defined as the portion of the year when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41 degrees Fahrenheit, 5 degrees Celsius), but also allows approximation from frost free days, based on air temperature. The growing season for any given site or location is determined from United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS) (formerly USDA, Soil Conservation Service (SCS)) data and information. Wetland hydrologic indicators include the following: visual observation of inundation or saturation, watermarks, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage pattern, and/or oxidized rhizospheres with living roots. Oxidized rhizospheres are defined as yellowish-red zones around the roots and rhizomes of some plants which grow in frequently saturated soils. 2.3.2 Wetland Substrate(Soils) Most wetlands are characterized by hydric soils. Hydric soils are those that are ponded, flooded, or saturated for long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. Periodic saturation of soils causes alternation of reduced and oxidized conditions which leads to the formation of redoximorphic features (gleying and mottling). Mineral hydric soils will be either gleyed or will have bright mottles and/or low matrix chroma. The redoximorphic feature known as gley is a result of greatly reduced soil conditions which result in a characteristic grayish, bluish or greenish soil color. The term mottling is used to describe areas of contrasting color within a soil matrix. The soil matrix is the portion of the soil layer that has the predominant color. Soils which have brightly colored mottles and a low matrix chroma are indicative of a fluctuating water table. Hydric soil indicators include: organic content of greater than 50%by volume, sulfidic material or"rotten egg"odor, and/or presence of redoximorphic features and dark soil matrix, as determined by the use of a Munsell Soil Color Chart. This chart establishes the chroma, value and hue of soils based on comparison with color chips. Mineral hydric soils usually have a matrix chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils, or a matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soils. 2.3.3 Wetland Biota (Vegetation) Wetland biota is defined as hydrophytic vegetation. A hydrophyte is a plant species that is capable of growing in substrates that are periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of saturated soil conditions. The US Fish and Wildlife Service, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, has established five basic groups of vegetation based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status", are as follows: obligate wetland plants (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), and obligate upland (UPL). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 -2- Indicator Code Status OBL Obligate wetland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands (>99%) FACW Facultative wetland. Estimated to occur 67-99% of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative. Occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands (34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Usually occur in non-wetlands (67-99%). UPL Obligate upland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands (>99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be obligate upland. NI Has not yet received a wetland indicator status, but is probably not obligate upland. 3.0 PROJECT METHODOLOGY 3.1 Off-Site Research Prior to beginning field work, available information was reviewed in order to ascertain where potential wetland may exist on-site, and to facilitate the gathering of data. This review included the USGS topographic quadrangle, the Soil Conservation Service soil series maps, the list of Oregon hydric soils by County, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) map, and the Local Wetlands Inventory(LWI) map for the site. 3.2 Wetland Delineation Field Methodology Observations of hydrology, soils, and vegetation, were made using the "Routine On-site" delineation method as defined in the 1987 manual. One-foot diameter soil pits were excavated up to a depth of 18 inches in selected locations. The soil profiles were examined for hydric soil and wetland hydrology field indicators. In addition, a visual percent-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community was performed using soil pit locations as a center of reference. Dominant plant species are based on estimates of percent cover for herbaceous, woody vine, and shrub species within a 5 foot radius of the sample point, and basal area cover for tree species within a 30 foot radius of the sample point. Plant species in each vegetative layer which are estimated at less than 20% are not considered to be dominant. The wetland indicator status is then used to determine if there is an overall dominance (greater than 50%) of wetland or upland plant species. Data documenting the three criteria for the representative sample locations are recorded in the field. This information is subsequently transferred to standard wetland delineation data sheets, which are included in Appendix A. In addition to the sample points, numerous other soil pits were excavated between the data points to verify changes in the three criteria. Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 -3 - 4.0 WETLAND CRITERIA DISCUSSION 4.1 Topography The eastern half of the site primarily consists of a nearly level, fenced-in storage area. A small shack is located along the north side of the fence. The graveled storage area extends westward to the moderately steep outer bank of the Fanno Creek floodplain. The creek channel is located just beyond the western property boundary, where it flows to the south. A backswamp, or lowland area, is located along the base of the slope which forms the outer bank of the floodplain, and extends beyond the northern and southern property boundaries. A small pond, which may have originated as an oxbow of Fanno Creek, is located immediately to the west of the backswamp, and is separated from it by a low berm. Site elevations range from approximately 124 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) in the northwestern corner of the site, to approximately 147 feet NGVD along the eastern reaches of the property, near SW 74th Avenue. 4.2 Hydrology Site hydrologic activity is most prominent within the Fanno Creek floodplain. The shallow pond and backswamp are seasonally inundated, with shallow water tables in adjacent areas. Upslope groundwater seepage is a significant hydrologic source for the backswamp area. Other hydrologic sources influencing the site include direct precipitation, overbank flooding of Fanno Creek, upslope seepage, and groundwater movement. The hydrology criterion for jurisdictional wetland was satisfied in the western half of the site in the pond and backswamp,by the presence of saturated soils, shallow water tables, evidence of ponding, wetland drainage patterns, and active oxidized rhizospheres. 4.3 Soils The US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (formerly, Soil Conservation Service (SCS))has mapped the site as having McBee silty clay loam (map unit 30), Quatama loam, 0 to 3% slopes (map unit 37A), and Wapato silty clay loam (map unit 43). Only the Wapato soil is considered to be hydric by the NRCS (USDA, SCS, 1989); however, the McBee and Quatama soils may contain hydric soil inclusions (Figure 2). McBee soils consist of moderately well drained soils that formed in alluvium on floodplains. In a representative profile, the surface layer is dark brown silty clay loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is silty clay loam about 34 inches thick, and is dark brown with common to many, fine, dark yellowish-brown, gray, and dark grayish-brown mottles. The substratum is dark gray clay loam about 20 inches thick. Permeability is moderate. This soil is classified as a fine-silty, mixed, mesic Ultic Haploxeralf. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 -4- ; / @ rr .. ' SOIL MAP UNITS g 1l s • .,, 1 t � - r - 30 = McBee silty clay loam• •; 37A= Quatama loam,0-3%slopes 18";r ._k - " 43 = Wapato silty clay loam. tl!',70 Tr. , NI!, , 4,,,„,, tl'il 414, N •,,)s* No. ' 7...... .".1 -= "-:-..11 : 11111111, ; tl. 'i.,3•47,-(.p, 1411 _f 4� y r 15 '�.'.. , S � 'Al., 4111galli lt t , 1 c S.�ik, : r`. � 1" -::-.:11 0 ''' 37: ,,,.'" $ .''' . ‘ t .4.; ' � � 1 N. � :a Q ��37A , y vet 1,, IF � � ' 1 d::' l 111 8. i4. 11 :. - �,° ;*a..„,.#01,----,l�Yr n" iii ,-,,,. .* 1<4. 1 n 30 y f91 a "4. ` ` 4 , „ti ,,,,4 I, - r -. iu L ,..0.,;:.; c3Cr"‘ ,.'it,l; 7-7 - -.. 4' A., �' �- ld �� sire yCa� Siu r <i v` .-',_ ...L..g" '' 1,' 1 , " ''','1 ' d' .,:oeis''''' 'V ./. "- ' , ..3"it.,:ll'''''%''''• ''4°..k.. 4 i 4,.. .... „ . _ # -.,* xt �7 fix. t l r.. ....,,i_4....,:yr i_•T` f. .:,,,4 jf t. _ r Arm - §fig .a SR ' �� .s M1 ,F.;.. a,� ; c 2i� .- 1.1 � pA sit 14 " 13 37B - #/. f4 �.tiek 2,.. 11.111111111111111111.1v, 10 2 a`r• y 21 B .- 3 i # J ML h �� •^•fir l3 / 13 • + : '• 13 21 B 4� _t., 23 I Herrn 14 3713 �" 7 w , ... 37: 43 tr r e q ' 6" '7,- • r 4:s 14 378 . ' v5 / _3t# `��, , ..(...) , l q G 13'0,. 4 b, 8/4/99 9-1931 Figure 2. Soil series for the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74"' Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (U.S.D.A.,S.C.S.,Washington County,OR. 1982). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. A �1 Si' Quatama soils consist of moderately well drained soils that formed in mixed, loamy alluvium on old terraces. In a typical profile, the surface layer is dark brown loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish-brown loam and clay loam about 34 inches thick. The substratum is dark yellowish-brown loam about 19 inches thick. Permeability is moderately slow. This soil is classified as a fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquultic Haploxeralf. The Wapato series consists of poorly drained soils that formed in recent alluvium on floodplains. In a representative profile, the surface layer is very dark grayish-brown silty clay loam about 14 inches thick. The subsoil is dark grayish-brown silty clay loam about 28 inches thick. Permeability is moderately slow. This soil is classified as a fine-silty, mixed, mesic Fluvaquentic Haplaquoll. Soils observed throughout most of the site ranged in color from dark brown(10YR 3/3) and dark grayish-brown (10YR 4/2), to very dark grayish-brown (10YR 3/2), dark gray(5Y 4/1), and very dark gray(10YR 3/1),with textures of silt loam, silty clay loam, silty clay, and sand. The hydric soils criterion was satisfied in the western half of the site, in the pond and backswamp,by the presence of soils with low matrix chromas,both with and without mottles. 4.4 Vegetation . The eastern half of the site consists of a gravel parking and storage lot that lacks vegetation. One notable tree, an Oregon white oak(Quercus garryana, UPL), is located in the north-central portion of the site. Vegetation within the Fanno Creek floodplain, and outer bank of the floodplain, primarily consists of herbaceous species such as colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis, FAC), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, FAC), common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale, FACU), slender vetch (Vicia tetrasperma, UPL), creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense, FACU+), and catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine, FACU). Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor, FACU) is also present in this area. The backswamp area supports a wetter herbaceous community including such species as meadow foxtail (Alopecurus geniculatus, OBL, and Alopecurus pratensis, FACW), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FACW), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera, FACW), and curly dock (Rumex crispus, FAC+). The pond consists of a slightly more diverse vegetation community than most of the site, and includes a large Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra, FACW+) tree, nodding beggars-ticks (Bidens cernua,FACW+ ), soft rush (Juncus effusus, FACW), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), and American speedwell (Veronica americana, OBL. The hydrophytic vegetation criterion was satisfied within the western half of the site, in the pond and backswamp,by the presence of a dominance of wetland plant species (plants with a wetland indicator status of FAC, FAC+, FACW-, FACW, FACW+, or OBL). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 - 5 - 5.0 WETLAND DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS 5.1 National and Local Wetlands Inventory The US Fish and Wildlife Service, as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) program, has not mapped wetland within the site(Figure 3). The City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI), however, has mapped wetland within the western portion of the study area(Figure 4), which is consistent with our findings. The NWI maps are generated primarily on the basis of interpretation of color infrared aerial photographs (scale of 1:58,000), with limited "ground truthing"to confirm the interpretations, this in part, may explain the difference between the NWI mapping and that of the LWI and PHS. 5.2 Wetland Conclusions Based on an investigation of the three required wetland criteria(wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation), PHS has identified approximately 0.84 acre of potentially jurisdictional wetland, associated with a shallow pond and backswamp area, in the western half of the site. Figure 5 shows the locations of potentially jurisdictional wetland and sample sites on the property. This delineation does not become jurisdictional until DSL and COE review and approve our assessment. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 - 6- 7 .rwr•r P?EM1Y.... ^ : r°n•Pf 01Y / .. • IY t -2 . T c —Pceitc,Lh / • - •Pl`OIY lax . , / / • 'i6.. • !vf \▪ „r� �•• l8 t .� ( • ' •fir• (: °... z.. ' , ' y /• �' e ), . ., •, SITE • 2- - � 1 _ b.� .. .° y: • •i,I : w ` j/,, t c. y t •' ',.:',k . Pow: i . .� r( ' ,,.• 3 Powic x M IY•r � -� ,••1,,,,,...•-' i f / ti ..i". y f •� r : t ! lay y', ! t'RNA M -r•. - _ROAD y ;.'•�.�• I. � T {. 4 tee. •` Y • r' ` •J • y,Yj ,' <-, / , OlY POW.2x `! �" �y ,i P(7VVK•t1 1, • / j � �-..) •Forii 'POWKZX •'. / • •�CaraYPf • - ---i-/ --k../(/\-...., 'z its R20W2 PEW/ •Gr• PO Zx ` 1A ••I, Pi PFOIY P,EOt • IFEMIKYa Pt+OIW . -. f` '.' RD - 14: Mst / 15751") (—P&./W K "It.--__% , \ ., 1 • . PE ,M4•Y • `` r .------- P• culit % � _POWKZx nr r3viAi 1 4, REMIW Fp M � , 8/4/99 9-1931 Figure 3. National Wetlands Inventory information for the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74`h Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (U.S.F.W.S., 1981). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc, i ,i JJ T i i r rw',.J L.I..�1 1 _ . 1_--Un_- 1 :enrknQ_l ' 1 .. [1 _ _______ - /.... __?:_r_.___... ,\ .. .. ; _ o ` — n} , .:::::.:2::.:.::':'• — — ■ `111 e : .�— LIN- I E ' _ _ CARDINAL IN P `- Iti- ,1 i1 a ■4 X 1 11� 1 �`� 1� 1 • Dw000 l.. :. .........\.:.:::::::.:.y.y.y.:.:.:.:.... iszil low .im'„��> r11111� ... .E z.:L . ' :: :WI l..= -; 111 111 ■I 11111 t .:.•:: :: -.. Ill s' VI11111 u■ 114sl 1-.::•:: / P GABLE LN : 11%12 a 77/ o 1111_- - / _ 1 �P. CITY OF TIGARD = _ ` 9 WETLANDS INVENTORY � ;• � l � — --� if °� UNIT 8 -G: 1 1 Q Identilied Wetlands A•1 Welland 10 / — _ Aquatic Resource Unil \ . \Fw Boundary * , A 1' 1s � / Stream Corridor Wetlands Qo i).) • r )y-Q� ] Public land Survey A Section IDs 8/1/99 9-1931 Figure 4. Local Wetlands Inventory information for the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (City of Tigard, OR, 1995). Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. P"s ji PH i1 1 Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. LEGEND Potentially \ I 1 jurisdictional wetland 2 __ '► - I AINIPIIM�� "": 1'� 1� "`°� �� — — — — ■ Wetland boundary l • 1 Sample point 4 A Ai at Nor Pg ,„ � N Ii► I I •5 ` ‘ 1 I A 1 0��s 1‘111 06 LOT 14 a ■ ■ illr * 11 ,,_ 0,,,, 1\\ , _ itl:l_ PlA A ' A . 1r V ill(ti. N 1/2 LOT 13 ..1/ AO . . I N u.,.... . . /; �. . . . A. I/ i Q • w rerr t J +.air n ,,,, ( 0 20 80 \J SCALE IN FEET 8/4/99 9- 1931 Figure 5 : Locations of potentially jurisdictional wetland and sample points on the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (base map provided by Andy Paris and Associates, Inc., 1999). 6.0 REFERENCES Munsell Color, 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland. Oregon Division of State Lands. September 1995. Removal-Fill Law (ORS 196.800-196.990) and Removal and Filling in Scenic Waterways (ORS 390.805-390.925). Reed, Porter B., Jr., 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL. NERC- 88/18.37. Scientific Resources, Inc., and Fishman Environmental Services, 1995. City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1982. Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1989. Oregon Hydric Soils by Counties. USFWS.National Wetlands Inventory map, Beaverton, Oregon quadrangle. Aerial photography in August, 1981; 1:58,000; color infrared. USGS. 7.5 Minute topographic map. 1961 photorevised 1984. Beaverton, Oregon quadrangle. Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for Meyer Signs/9-1931 - 7- Appendix A Wetland Determination Data Forms Wetland Determination Data Form ,i li iri Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: Meyer Signs [Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 1 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999 _ Investigators: CR/FS _Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: >14 Inches Drainage patterns: Depth to saturation: >14 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Other: Sediment deposits: rerfaila Met: No SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-14 10YR 3/3 SL 'SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay t )41(:a 4t 10 '.. N' 1 VEGETATION Tree Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 100% ) Status % Cover Agrostis tenuis* FAC 20 Festuca arundinacea* FAC- 20 Geranium molle UPL 10 Holcus lanatus FAC 10 Rumex acetosella FACU+ 10 Taraxacum officinale FACU 10 Shrub Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Vicia tetrasperma* UPL 20 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL*: 33% 'Criteria Met: No Comments: 'Determination: Upland Wetland Determination Data Form Firr.----11 511 Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: Meyer Signs !Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 2 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999 Investigators: CR/FS Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: Inches Drainage patterns: Depth to saturation: 0 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Yes Other: upslope seepage Sediment deposits: ICriferia Met: Yes SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-8 10YR 3/2 SCL 7.5YR 3/3 few, fine, faint 8-14 10YR 3/1 SCL 7.5YR 3/4 common, medium, distinct I *SD Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 100% ) Status % Cover Alopecurus pratensis* FACW 40 Galium aparine FACU tr Ranunculus repens* FACW 50 Rumex crispus FAC+ 10 Taraxacum officinale FACU tr Shrub Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL*: 100% 'Criteria Met: ,x Yes Comments: !Determination: Wetland Wetland Determination Data Form � �� ii Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: Meyer Signs (Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 3 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999 Investigators: CR/FS Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: >14 Inches Drainage patterns: Depth to saturation: >14 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Other: Sediment deposits: f 1 +C 3'iF: 4.4(4 ski SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-11 10YR 3/2 SL 11-14+ 10YR 4/2 SL 7.5YR 4/6 common, medium, distinct •SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay . w._ VEGETATION Tree Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 95% ) Status % Cover Alopecurus pratensis* FACW 30 Festuca arundinacea* FAC- 20 Agrostis stolonifera* FAC 50 Geranium sp. UPL tr Shrub Stratum (5% ) Status % Cover Pyrus sp.* UPL 100 Woody Vine Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL*: 50% K+itRa4► '►°i= ', \`11 y Comments: _ko l ollii?-:0 91i.: li �1 ,.id Wetland Determination Data Form Errifii Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: Meyer Signs (Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 4 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999 Investigators: CR/FS Township: 2S Range: 1 W Section: 12 Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: Inches Drainage patterns: Depth to saturation: 0 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Yes Other: Sediment deposits: !Criteria Met: Yes SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-14 10YR 3/2 SCL 10YR 3/6 many, medium, distinct *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay ),-1)$,.4 it k) \';4., s. VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 100% ) Status % Cover Agrostis stolonifera* FAC 30 Alopecurus geniculatus* OBL 20 Alopecurus pratensis* FACW 30 Ranunculus repens FACW 10 Rumex crispus FAC+ 10 Shrub Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL*: 100% (Criteria Met: Yes Comments: (Determination: Wetland Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services,Inc: Project: Meyer Signs (Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 5 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999 Investigators: CR/FS Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: Inches Drainage patterns: Yes Depth to saturation: 0-7 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Yes Other: algal mats Sediment deposits: !Criteria Met: Yes SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-7 5Y 4/1 SC 7.5YR 3/4 common, medium,prominent 7-14 5Y 4/1 SC 7.5YR 3/4 many, medium,prominent *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 100% ) Status % Cover Agrostis stolonifera* FAC 20 Alopecurus geniculatus* OBL 20 Bidens cernua* FACW+ 20 Juncus effusus FACW 10 Phalaris arundinacea* FACW 20 Veronica americana OBL 10 Shrub Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL*: 100% 'Criteria Met: Yes`' Comments: Determination: Wetland Wetland Determination Data Form RI7P°-)1 „ ill Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: Meyer Signs !Number: 9-1931 Sample Site: 6 Applicant: Meyer Signs County: Washington Date: May 4, 1999• Investigators: CR/FS _Township: 2S Range: 1W Section: 12 I Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated (Yes/No): No Water marks: Depth of inundation: Inches Drift lines: Depth to free water: >14 Inches Drainage patterns: Depth to saturation: >14 Inches Oxidized rhizospheres: Other: Sediment deposits: ( ) iii,>s i , o4+,�i '‘;ii SOILS Mapped Series: McBee silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Cumulic Ultic Haploxeroll Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-10 10YR 3/3 SD 10-14 10YR 4/2 SD 1OYR 3/4 common, coarse, distinct *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam,L=Loam,SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam,S=Silt,SL=Silt Loam,SCL=Silty Clay Loam,CL=Clay Loam,C=Clay i, ia , ,,: -j-i.4 VEGETATION Tree Stratum (0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (70% ) Status % Cover Cirsium arvense FACU+ 10 Festuca arundinacea* FAC- 30 Galium aparine* FACU 20 Poa pratensis* FAC 30 Vicia sp. UPL 5 • Shrub Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover Rubus discolor* FACU 100 Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW, or OBL*: 25% /,1Ka ,� k�t ,,,I� t Comments: iii �041i,iiit,ofo i, 0.0-kd PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITYOFTICARD ''\\4 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Communi IRDMAo ent urr or naaR®,aa�aon (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six[6)Months] sc ommu Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE k rzr STAFF AT PRE-APP (2:7(11 APPLICANT: AL- 1�R S AGENT: \ �•� �`. t ANC _ V` Nk- S) 1 Phone:[ l Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: 4- itD TAX MAPS)/LOT NECESSARY APPLICATION[S]: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ((- - CT ID chi v.J ? Z.J( 0,1i ��� S� VM I S - �3-1NC- s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN l -t. t= MAP DESIGNATION: -4f4411 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: J—e C.I.T.AREA FACILITATOR: PHONE: 15031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS / rJ Ads ` aim" zer4id d MINIMUM LOT SIZE: pad- sq. ft. Arge lot width: a ft.j Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front '3 ft. Side __ ft. Rear _• ft. Corner- ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum lands aped or natural vegetation area: 2.5 %. (Refer to Code Section 18. 5C) 1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOTFRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as 'art o - .. . .•n must have a minimum of 15 feet of front-.- • ave inimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 T S THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the mini • m lot size o - - applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ ES ABLISHED AREAS: feet f ➢ LO ER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's ry. ✓ FLAG L SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: r A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; r All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and r The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. L��S [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.] � � �,Q,.� �` PARKING AND ACCESS �° I REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 1' Lf ltt`aD ZS Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 2 —2--7 SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ✓ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. ✓ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040] Handicapped Parking: r All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. r BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: + Minimum access width: 'XU . Minimum pavement width: I All driveways and parking areas, except fo some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: /A- [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.705] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] 4IOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080] CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.195) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. 0 feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. — 35 feet along west boundary. IN AD ITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: -C LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Division Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 113.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS — `' - l� — c e /� ��SI I The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 STEEP SLOPES Csttx \ tyz_ -em d\ creueetk When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted whigh addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 11011-Residential Application/Planning Division Section WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI J -WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forest and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NOR H FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE. DGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND_A8chichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SET:ACK1 , unl ss modified in accordance with this chapter. ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.030] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 +TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; b Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) NARRATIV e APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32) CODE CHAPTERS / 18.330 ✓ 18.390 _ 18.520 18.715 /18.765 /18.795 18.350 18.420 ./ 18.530 / 18.730 ? 18.775 / 18.797 IL 18.360 18.430 18.620 /18.745 .718.780 ./ 18.800 7 18.370 18.510 / 18.705 / 18.755 /18.790 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Applicalioa/Planning Division Section NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDI SION PLAT NAME RESERVATION "RIOR TO SUBMITTING SUBDIVISION LAND -E APPLICATION with the City • Tigard, ai'plicant's are resuires o complete and file a subdivisio slat naming request wit - - Washington Co my Surveyor's •ffice in order to obtain approval/r- -rvation for .• . subdivision name. App • ations wi not be accepted as complete until the City rec- Yes the faxed confirmation of approv. : the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: StC(i■( J 'plc, tiS C 5,;∎ (-kC*T t4 — C.05 vitkAckf # It t s E\ Qp kltt visE, �k `(L 1�VS—ckect Gr,?.�1�-J I� � lC �L I t tl � . a� l (AG'r1,641S 04 lle �i NO kt �anaA/ 1 � -RV) ( ilid ) ∎M- 1, 1.0D Ft� ems/ (� Ir" 1-140 t�q ce■-// Ot a/J if/1 tIt- I r. Sv � •en, CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Resldentlal Application/Planning Division Section PROCEDURE y Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 8'/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use piecisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard -ttt`-# ■ c c . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of ood site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: `k �� I CITY OF TAARD CANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4171 FAX: 503 684-7297 E-MAIL: staf s first name)@ ci.tigard.or.us is\a rpl n\mas ters\revis ed\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Derision Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ..I'll' ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Commuu Oregon Shaping Better Community 2-51 l2- 7) PUBLIC FACILITIES The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( 1-r �w �4 to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to _ _feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( �' street improvements will be necessary along Sw 4 O to include: feet of pavement Fvz., Ito (- 42-8 concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities cj -foot concrete sidewalk (street trees ('street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ( ) strei ,iprovements will be necessary alc to include: feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb I storm sewers and other underground utilities Ti -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk I street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( ) Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 016 Engineering Department Section are on the opposite e of the street from the site. If thf 3 in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanita sewer line to this property is a(n) ,, i� -,i , inch line which is located A-Qj 14 -( f . The proposed development must be connected to a public sari' ary sewer. It is the develops responsibility to - 7 5 (€ 70 —rt-,S Water Supply: The C1 144 - Phone:(503) (c_ 44-7( provides public water service in the rea of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious aces. The resolution contains a r .sion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided sp..cific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( v) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • In addition, the pei .ee will be required to post a bor 1r similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division, Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% arid foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section • GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FO UBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: Q 4(al ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF Phone: 15031639-4171 Fax: 15031684-7297 h 1patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section.preapp-r mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: y--(2-70, 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1" x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Qy Vicinity Map 1‹ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan • Existing Conditions Map I' Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map I( Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan G2r/ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan C�j Site Development Plan 12/ Architectural Drawings B Landscape Plan l2/ Sign Drawings UPublic Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES _2,`9 COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES ANL) r<EPORTS ' Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study [� Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis I2V Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map a Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded o• ers of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchma .t 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of th- ollowing (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and e• ements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and star, sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including re hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone trans ► ssion lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for p. s, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all tre: with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all ructures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain aft: platting ❑ Supplemental infor' ation including: • Proposed d:-d restrictions (if any) ❑ • A propos=• plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing na .ral features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The prop. ed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purpos: other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If an •f the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ > Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' f• slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easeme and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and hin 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or great- caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than z5% ❑ Location of existing a d propo d utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restri ons ❑ Evidence that land pa ion will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 ' Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 . {)0?C}::?iT:•i:}:::i :•i:4:ii.: r :vi•iYvit:ii•i};�:4:Oii� Pre-A s (CD Meetings) ::».::::.:;; :;: April 1999 S M T W T F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 `a < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 2 ;'. 18 19 20 21 22 23 4 ,:? 25 26 27 28 29 30 • Tuesday, April 27, 1999 8:00 8:30 9.00 ,Julia Out of M k please do not'sdiedule more than 2 pre-apps• 9:30 10:00 nJien1 w A rbnritdrrinwg s 620-2086 for Meyer Signs, 2S112DB-00600 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 • 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 3:16PM Thursday,April 15, 1999 c o ` N ;Wai i7 CO HIV"APPROXIMATE �mm11f%11 0 0`�' "' \ Armes 0 N 0 EDGE OF EXTG. I I I ,..�'�, ` N N pp TAX LOT 50� A.G. . I 1iiI1iiill 1I v� rn `° `° ADDITIONAL 5' I I I I '�■\1117l� ri i ROW DEDICATION 'T.51'�J v C`.1 `o " " \ �� 4, 50 111.ril12 a 14 - O R RR R.O.W. minima 3 L \ (� INTERSTATE ROOFING SITE I j o t I I I I '=-i-o ' 'llC N o ------------ --- ----- - --------- 171 o rn 0_• H � ti ` � "� ` BUILDING I � I I I Z \ Q (OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE) I I I I O u -c>\ 0 k."� 1/�- �is iIvekte APPROX. TOP ` V /tj.' I I I Q W ) OF BANK I I I I I V • 11 I — Z TAX LOT 600 ' KG . 4(." (N1 \ gt--1173-14 .r--. k416 6 ',' ! ' - iktsc 9€5k --c•1"4et- f 4-c 0_ cc c I I PARKING LL FANNO GREEK BAS1 I S ORAL �( � z ' - Y ` r, l I I I I W No I IJ o ��v I I sue' a. U 410---------__-----------j---__- - ...-- ?3 EY' i i F- III z 1 z o TAX LOT 100 � z CL NORTH �� 1 I I I 0 0 rn SITE PLAN o 5 0 Q Z �, Q 1" = 60' J co " z W W w CT) § o sTrE ItsFOFMAT1ON VICI Ty MAP 0 z CE ac esonirrawaso W p >- 6 TAX MAP NO. 25 1 12DB .—� # Q CD TAX LOT NO. 600 i „T SITE AREA: 334 ACRES i i PROJECT BOUNDARY: 21,500 SF. DATE: 4-15-99 FOOD PLAIN ELEVATION . 135' P DRN BY: DJL CHK'D BY: JDA i ,,,,,,,-; '°' JOB #: 9g0404 DWG #: SITE PLAN 1 OF: 1 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CITY OF TIGARD OREGON September 14, 1999 Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering & Construction PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 Dear Mr. Andrews: The US Army Corps. of Engineers and Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) has forwarded an application packet for protecting Oregon's Waters to the City to be completed by the property owner/applicant in relation to your proposed "Meyer Sign Company" project. Please complete all of the information requested and send one signed copy of the application to each agency as indicated on the Joint Permit Application Form. If you have any questions in regard to the Joint Permit Application, please contact the agencies directly. Sincerely, lia Powell Hajd Associate Planner i:\curpin\julia\sdr\Meyer Sign Joint Application Letter.doc c: SDR1999-00013 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 APPLICATION PACKAGE FOR PROTECTING OREGON'S WATERS Introduction The Oregon Division of State Lands(DSL),the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), and the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)have specific and different regulatory roles designed to protect the waters within and on Oregon's boundaries. Protecting Oregon's waters is a cooperative effort between the applicant and regulatory agencies. This application package has been designed to assist applicants to initiate the permit evaluation process for activities that include construction,excavation,or filling in a water of Oregon. Instructions and application forms are contained within the package. This application package also lists the activities that are typically proposed by an applicant and regulated by DSL,DEQ,and the Corps;the applicant's role in protecting Oregon's waters; and a description of the permit evaluation process. The state and national goal is to protect the biological, chemical, and physical integrity of Oregon's waters. Regulated Activities Construction, excavation, or filling in Oregon's waters, which may include streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, or the Pacific Ocean, may require authorization (a permit) from one or both agencies before the project is started. Because of their value,wetlands are given special regulatory emphasis. Some common activities in Oregon's waters that may require a permit include: a. excavation or dredging b. channel changes, realignments, or relocations c. construction of a dock, pier,wharf; seawall, boat ramp, beach, intake or outfall structure d. placement of fill, riprap, or similar material e. constructing a dam across any waterway f. placing fill to construct levees, roadways, and bridges g. bank or shore stabilization projects including jetties and revetments The Applicant's Role Oregon's water resources were once seemingly abundant and limitless. As development intensified and technology progressed,it became apparent that individual and cumulative effects were causing negative impacts and that there was a limit to the state's water resources. State and federal regulatory programs were established to protect the public's interest in Oregon's valuable water resources. The applicant's role is to obtain the necessary permits to ensure that the water resources are wisely used and adequately protected for future generations. Regulatory Agencies' Roles In Oregon, DSL and the Corps administer permit programs. DEQ will, for some permits, require that applicants obtain water quality certification before a permit can be issued by DSL and the Corps. Their roles, when considered together, include protecting navigable waters (and the ocean); ensuring wise and beneficial water use; maintaining and enhancing water quality; protecting fish and wildlife habitat and recreation resources;and,in general,protecting the public interest. Their regulatory authorities are described below. DSL administers the Removal-Fill Permit Program,O.R.S. 196.800 - 196.990. A major focus of this law is the protection, conservation, and best use of the water resources in the state of Oregon. This statute regulates the removal of 50 cubic yards or more of material from one location in any calendar year or the filling of a waterway with 50 cubic yards or more of material at any one location at any time. This law applies to"waters of the state,"which includes the Pacific Ocean, bays, rivers, streams, and salt and freshwater wetlands. your proposal requires a full public interest review,it will be described in a joint public notice and sent to interested parties, particularly neighbors whose interests may be affected, and state and federal agencies. A public comment period is usually 30 days. The purpose of the public notice is to assist the District Engineer(Corps),DEQ, and DSL to determine what public interest factors need to be considered. A permit decision will be based on the need and purpose for the project in light of the public's overall welfare. In exceptional instances,a public hearing may be held. Allow at least 60 - 90 days for the Corps, DEQ, and DSL to review your application. FAX transmissions are unacceptable for our files. FAXes may be used to provide timely project information, however,original materials are required for the file and permanent record keeping. Reporting Unauthorized Construction There are instances where others may start or complete a project without state or federal . authorization. DSL, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Corps have regulatory responsibility and authority to deal with unauthorized activities. If you are aware of an activity that may have started or is completed without a permit, you are encouraged to contact either agency to request an investigation. Specific information describing the activity,dates,names,and locations are needed; photos are helpful. Protecting Oregon's waters is a cooperative effort. Violators(those engaging in unauthorized activities)are subject to legal penalties,including fines. Jurisdictional Information The figure below depicts the general kinds of areas for which the state and federal regulatory agencies exert jurisdiction. . Tidal Waters Fresh Waters State&Federal Uplands State&Federal ■ f Regulatory Jurisdiction n Regulatory Jurisdiction ‘,e Uplands High Tide line -...1 ill 111 II i Ordinary .T Mean High Water ±• High Weser � �� ._ P ,.1� . c,»e >-- .w. li "l \`.a QINIME 1 Coast Fresh Tidelands Wetlands 'Weft Water Wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal conditions do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps,marshes,bogs,and similar [geomorphic or landscape] areas. When determining whether an area is a wetland,three parameters are assessed:hydrology(is the area saturated or inundated with water at some time during the growing season); hydric soils (are the soils those that are commonly found in wetlands);and vegetation(is there a predominance of vegetation that commonly grows in wet areas). If these three parameters are present, the area is probably a wetland—and regulated. If one of these parameters is missing and the area is disturbed,special consideration is needed to determine if the area is a wetland. Page 3 • causes the drawing to be difficult to read and understand. Typical details include cross-section and top views with the dimensions of the project and the project site; project's elevation; a "north" arrow;direction of flow;name of water body or wetland(wetlands are usually adjacent to a named water body or are isolated); water elevation, particularly the ordinary high water(011W) and/or mean high water(the tidelands)and the high tide line. Be sure to indicate the source of your water datum. Common reference elevations include National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) (informally called Mean Sea Level (m.s.1.)) which is commonly used in non-tidal areas and Columbia River Datum(CRD)that is a plane of reference on the Columbia River from Harrington Point upstream to Bonneville Dam and on the Willamette River from its confluence with the Columbia River to Willamette Falls at Oregon City. Show side slopes, e.g., 1 vertical to 3 horizontal, and dimensions of the structure,channel,or work activity. Additionally, a title block should include the applicant's name,waterway,date,brief(2-4 word)description of project; and sheet number of total sheets in set,e.g.,sheet 2 of 4. The location map(s)must show the general and the specific areas where the project is located. A topographic(quad)map is particularly useful. This is needed to determine latitude and longitude. Identifiable or landmark features and existing structures need to be identified. The permit evaluator should be able to precisely locate the project site from the location maps. Photos(Polaroid and/or aerials,especially one from the Department of Agriculture of the project area are very helpful. If a site is a wetland, please submit wetland delineation data, including a map with data reference points and the wetland's boundary. All drawings must be submitted on 81/2 X 11 paper. If you submit engineering drawings to DSL to provide better project details, submit at least 5 copies. Please review the sample drawings included in this package. They provide guidance about the kinds of information that is needed. These drawings include the minimum details that is typically needed permit evaluation, e.g., vicinity map,project location map,typical cross sections and a representative top view. You may use one 81/2 X 11 sheet of paper for each project sketch or view. If drawings are drawn to scale, please include a bar graph scale that indicates correct dimensions. Block Number 5. These questions provide more specific project information. The first question provides an opportunity to present information about how you have evaluated other designs or site locations in your effort to avoid or minimize anticipated project impacts. When your project is designed,it is best to choose the alternative that will cause the least environmental damage and still be practicable and meet your basic project purpose. The second question asks you to describe ways to minimize impacts. This may include reducing the size of the construction area;reducing the size of the fill / excavation area; preventing construction debris, soil and other disturbed material(including return flows)from entering a waterway;proposed temporary and permanent erosion control measures employed to control off-site movement of soil;if necessary,storm water runoff treatment measures to limit flooding and to treat runoff to meet water quality standards; identification of and handling/treatment/disposal of toxic sediments,if present; identify other possible impacts to water quality and proposed mitigation measures; reshaping or constructing side slopes to be at least 1 vertical to 3 horizontal; and revegetating the area, particularly the disturbed area, with native vegetation. Block Number 6. If a public notice will be issued for your proposal, all who may have a reasonable interest in or may be likely affected by your proposal must receive a copy of the notice. Please include the mailing address of all neighbors to the proposed project,including those across the stream or river, in this block. Also list any other authorizations or dealings with either the Corps or DSL that is related to your proposal. If an identification number was assigned,please list the number to assist in cross referencing your proposal. Page 5 • O F p�� I I JOINT US Army Corps PERMIT APPLICATION FORM of Engineers THIS APPLICATION WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES I Portland District s s e AGENCIES WILL ASSIGN NUMBERS Corps Number Oregon Division of State Lands Number SEND ONE SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO EACH AGENCY District Engineer State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP Division of State Lands PO Box 2946 775 Summer Street NE Portland OR 97208-2946 Salem OR 97310-1337 503-808-4373 503-378-3805 Applicant Name business phone# and Address home phone# FAX# O Co-Applicant business phone# O Authorized Agent home phone# O Contractor P Name and Address FAX# Property Owner business phone# Of different than applicant) home phone# Name and Address FAX# OO PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description Quarter Section Township Range 0 North 0 East O South 0 West In or Near(City or Town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot# Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? 0 Yes 0 No 0 With prior notification 0 PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: 0 Fill 0 Excavation (removal) 0 In-Water Structure 0 Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Fill will involve cubic yards annually and/or cubic yards for the total project cubic yards in a wetland or below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be 0 Riprap 0 Rock 0 Gravel 0 Sand 0 Silt 0 Clay 0 Organics 0 Other Fill Impact Area is Acres: length: width: depth Removal will involve cubic yards annually and/or cubic yards for the total project cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be 0 Riprap 0 Rock 0 Gravel 0 Sand 0 Silt 0 Clay 0 Organics 0 Other Removal Impact Area is Acres; length; width: depth Is the Disposal area: Upland? 0 Yes 0 No Wetland /Waterway? 0 Yes 0 No Are you aware of any Endangered Species on the project site? 0 Yes 0 No If Yes, please explain in the project Are you aware of any Cultural Resources on the project site? 0 Yes 0 No description (on page 2, block 4). Is the project site near a Wild and Scenic River? 0 Yes 0 No I © , Y / COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AF' /IT (to be completed by local planning offic. ()This project Is not regulated by the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ()This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ()This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ()Consistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: 0 Conditional Use Approval 0 Development Permit 0 Plan Amendment 0 Zone Change 0 Other An application 0 has 0 has not been made for local approvals checked above. Signature(of local planning official) Title City/County Date ® COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone,the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD)for its concurrence or objection.For additional information on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program,contact the department at 1175 Court Street NE,Salem,Oregon 97310 or call 503-373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the proposed activity described in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date 0 SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and,to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority Including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local,county,state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. Print/Type Name (coapplicant) Title Applicant Signature (coapplicant) Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Print/Type Name Title Authorized Agent Signature Date a Grande 14 ICIA11140 II . . IL MI *411; *.:• piallailLIN itt...iii illowN9111- .-: . ..... . cS:, . ' n.. ph.$ ° Bakery N .. y , W -.4.>" E 41101 ill= 1 � Idaho s ' 'mil. ' it �! � � �� u,�On. draw ! 4 ii` "�.'°' WI � .I:3 ..•-. .: / .■ ! V Vicinity Map ■ i +\ ``7.k U CJ /. i v ''� '° `fit ' \ ( , �. � Vi-VPjj 46 ... `..... ' , 14b, Project Location ‹... ./1, 2 • '\ \41/-lit \, litTh%jili - ;. so 6 i N .,,,,,I: Alb 0 -z:: ... -. Dayville w E Pfta 1 1:;1 11 2 °:;ti Qe+ �/a��` Mlle ��J � )✓. ti• •`. 213 flow , ,_7._?:f:.� - � \ As �- 2 l') -:c___} ..„......,./...A,3.,_ „....,, \ , , v : .) J r\ ,, I , S',5 r� . l 84-5 ✓ill Project Location Map U5GS Quadrangle- Dayville,Oreg Bank Protection John & Mary Public John Day River at mile 214 Sheet 1 of 2 January 1994 Y s_ 3I wetland '-_ �'_ <— 120 feet bank protection .A using trees � z F road crossing across wetland and creek `k ® n -/` i l4 Lost Fish Creek ' if w -1) D $ , , a 1 . S Top View of Project Site no scale 4 , , L 15 feet dacha sprigs to help . Q cable stabilize bank �` top of bank 11, I ,, o(.'� � Ordinary High Water lint 6 feet 0,4 .. trees for bank protection — 4------ river bed o 055 Section View of A - A' no scale road crossing 1- 12 feet >1 r� (fill) 6 foot culvert F 4. 3 feet 41e0 ° %\._.alit* >I wetland limit(17 ft) < 30 feet —> Typical Cross Section View of B - B' no scale Bank Protection & Road Fill - Mary Poe Public Lost Fish Creek & Adjacent Wetland Sheet 2 of 2 January 1994 FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Oct. 26 1999 01:24PM P1 • 1�\1■ II i� l u ■ y'J 11 III�� 1: i rUPlI IL's/ and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 F A X C O V E R S H E E T DATE: October 26, 1999 TIME: 1:53 PM TO: JULIA HAJDUK PHONE: (503) 639-4171 COMPANY: CITY OF TIGARD FAX: (503) 684-7297 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: JIM ANDREWS PHONE: (503) 620-2086 FAX: (503) 684-3636 RE: MEYER SIGN CO. PROJECT PAGES: 3 Message ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST. v FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 664 3636 Oct. 26 1999 01:24PM P2 I 1-71,' Llil ■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ ■■■U■■■■ ■■■1 ■■■ ilim E■.. U■ ■ C■■■■■■■■■■■■IL■.■■.I■.■■■ ■■■■ --- a■ , ■■■■ ■■Ur■■■ ■E■■■■I■■■■N■■■■■IU■■■•■■■■ ■■■O■■■■■ , 1 � ■■■••• • ■■■■•lu■■••■■■■•■■■■1111■■■diI'iiP " 11 `111 ¶1 R � .I 1 j ■t 1.- i 11 O iYWi/milhiaia-IWEWiMr_■■■■ 1 1 ; i _ 1 I and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086• FAX (503) 684-3636 October 26, 1999 City of Tigard Planning Department ATTN: Julia 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Additional Information for a Variance Request Meyer Building SW 74th Ave. Tigard, OR Job #99-0404 Dear Julia: The following information is being provided to support the submitted Variance Request for the Meyer Project. First, I would like to reiterate the major points from the original Variance Request. Due to various agency requirements Mr. Meyer is unable to use approximately 57% (1.57 acres) or over half of his site. We believe that 1,500 square feet of open space being omitted from the front yard area (per Variance Request) is more than offset by the 68,389 square feet of area being preserved by the restrictions being placed upon the project site. We have spoken with Mr. Meyer and have additional information regarding the area to the north of the building. We have added an additional garage door in the west elevation (NW corner) under the covered area. This will allow trucks to move in and out of the building at this area (see attached sketch). This movement is apparently a critical component to the operation of Meyer Signs. The final item, which supports the front yard set back requirement, is the structural character of the site. Carlson Testing has performed soil investigation studies and determined the site has liquefaction potential in a seismic event. The tests show that the liquefaction potential increases the further west from 74th Ave. one travels. With the setback reduction, the building can be structurally upgraded, at minimal cost impact, to offset the liquefaction concern. If the building is located further to the west (toward Fanno Creek), the liquefaction potential increases to the point that serious and costly measures must be taken in order to insure the safety of the occupants of the structure. We believe that the setback reduction is the least amount necessary to develop a facility that meets the operational and business requirements of Meyer Sign Company and also allows the structure to be constructed without serious, costly structural solutions to the seismic conditions of the site. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews JDA/cjb Enclosure R11r1 NICOLI ENGIVEERING FAX NO. : 583 684 3636 Oct. 26 1999 01:25PM P3 \ 1 , • I. PROPOSED BUILDING •;' 14000 SF. S i all (140' x 100') ME. . 6 Iii;: 1. .i 0 LIT ! o LIi s 1 1 1 i n I I I 12, —1 12'41. ' 1 ,. 100'-011 ' V j,9'- "-„`IO'-0X 5'47a” .. 1 s • �•.3 b s �`•f�' •• , _//i // 1 �/ 1 / I // 50' RIPARIAN ZONE I / SET BACK FROM 1 V ,/. WETLAND BOUNDARY 1 .9 i H -------___,,■-- -1 / ° PARTIAL SITE PLAN T 1"=20'-0" N ElIII11 Ell PROJECT: MEYER SIGN PROJECT ti ZIIVI NOUN alI;.-III Oil_ DATE: 10-26-99 JOB NO. 990404 PREPARED BY: JD4 -i r li iiiri>,�Yiii and Construction Services Inc_ Phone: (503) 620-2086 CLIENT: DENNY METER I PAGE NO. CJK- 1 DATE ;71 PLANS CHECK NO.: 1 PROJECT TITLE: �' COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ( APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL • $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 - PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION L IP ION OF RATE WEEKDAY lAVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO OCCUPANCY / COO Cr RATE BASIS: / / °°C::' QCOfDSED /ti1pkSt-PJ,4l. ezP$ r iF - P L 5f x p'.9rf K 449"11 usF 0,9Yfa-eaeY CALCULATIONS: r/f - /goOK 6.gt7 _ q7. 5-8" �t sFf�( '93.co = / PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE; e r ci. f 33 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ✓� n ` ROAD AMT.: %6 Gd 7,_Q C' i �j�� TRANSIT AMT���� fPREPARED BY 6/7/99 t\shared\ping\wpsharelscottlAtiflprocOdures manuaNworksheel 99-OO.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK - _ abv, ENA 1 G1 _ and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 December 10, 1999 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ATTN: Julia Hajduk Associate Planner RE: Meyer Sign Company SDR 1999-00013 Our job #99-0404 Dear Julia: The following responses address your Site Development Review comments. Our numbered items correspond with your numbered items. 1. We have submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers and DSL. 2. Understood - Noted on sheet 1.3 & 1.5. 3.J.Jnderstood - Noted on sheet 1.3 & 1.5. q�The street tree has been moved from the clear vision area - see sheet 1.4. 5Additional plantings have been located at this area. The vision clearance height requirements are noted in note No. 4, under general notes. 6VWalkway has been noted as concrete on sheet 1.3 & 1.4. 7. Written sign-off has been enclosed.? 8. We are presently working on this item. It should be completed shortly. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA/cjb FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Dec. 15 1999 11:24AM P1 SIR (999- 0003 IN a rsaltig aim '1 lI►�II!1 Zil!iIIlz!!■ .iii auma r._adauaih and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 F A X C O V E R S H E E T DATE: December 15, 1999 TIME: 11:07 AM TO: Julia Hajduk PHONE: (503) 639-4171 COMPANY: City of Tigard FAX: (503) 684-7297 FROM: Jim Andrews PHONE: (503) 620-2086 FAX: (503) 684-3636 RE: Meyer Sign Company Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 Message Letter re: complete application for Meyer Sign Company, original to follow. cc faxed to Jim Hendriyx, Director of Community Development and Denny Meyer, Property owner. FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Dec. 15 1999 11:25AM P2 �, �■■ ■■■■■ ■1•■■�■■■ i l ; IS■■■I S■■■N■■■■■■N■■■■■M ., MIME= ■ j__;__ ■■. ■■■■ ■■■■ r■_�/■■■••••00•u■■ —■ ■ ■■ 1 ; ■ ■.■■■ ■■■■■■ ` � ' ■■S SSS■■ R U■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■/:■�■■■ ■■ , ; 1•I Kr- j ..ns■�� ■■■■iii■ ■■■■■•i i l t i • ■ ■■■■■ ■ 10111 Ir ME' (MIEN! i■■■■ i i ! ; , - ��■ ■■MC■ !�.U i►'p710., t '1.111.■■■ ■■■EM■■■■ ,.:._ ■ ■ ■lQ�, sT■p_r• rnnrn. 1111■ ■■■ _ ■■■m ■■a■UU'U■I OIL. L I ILA a w 61 Iv'u�■■�E■■■■■ ��i■ ■ _, - 1111 1111 ■LWANW/illiaii iYM/■■ ■■ and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O.Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ATTN: Julia Hajduk RE: Meyer Sign Company 15205 SW 70th Tigard, OR 97223 AR - 1999-00013 Job #99-0404 Dear Ms. Hajduk: This letter is to verify that the Meyer Sign Architectural Review application is complete. It is our understanding that this project site is now exempt from any future setback restrictions from the wetlands, etc., being discussed and shortly implemented by governing agencies and would be grandfathered in accordingly. Please notify this office by phone and in writing to confirm our understanding of the City's policy. Sincerely, c:: c42......,.....L4.-0-1:::? .......411-4-4-4-"-4---1 James D. Andrews Property Manager JDA/cjb cc: Jim Hendriyx Director of Community Development Denny Meyer Property Owner FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 v�r car ao 14.JA tip AC., U1. 0 Dec. 15 1999 02:29PM P2 Jd ( IQ6QirUB;�d"¢''' Pride Disposal Co. $,I, 1 es cpod,1-4.x- 7 FWE ,D,,,„_000,3 K") ( � ki� Tel �,0 l t h9 L►1aat.."i 0.g From: vti.� L,.? Feud ( Dates to - S 9 7 Phone: Pages:4 Re: Aitm J t k 4 s Urgent O Car Review ❑ Please Carnmeat 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle TELOPHON6(603)6286177 FAX 0 (503)62417 toj: a p r eP !j% h..z.47.).s :'f G4 J a-5 cS"W W • 50"," , 0� fF FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Dec. 15 1999 02:30PM P3 vaica%aa 11:bi1 's3: D15 et!u Y:(! & D1SYUSAL 4002/6Ci • and Construction Services inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 !"FAX COVER SHEET DATE: June 28. 1999 TIME: 3:07 PM TO: LENNY H I NG PHONE: (503) 625-6177 COMPANY: PRIDE DISPOSAL CO. FAX: (503) 625-6179 FROM: JIM ANDREWS PHONE: (503) 620-2088 FAX: (503) 684-3636 RE: MEYER BUILDING Number of pages including cover sheet 3 Message LENNY, PLEASE REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING IF THIS MEETS WITH YOUR SATISFACTION. THANKS , 'WireE:E0 6661 SE "l-'T': 9£9t 1739 £ZS : 'ON *IA nNI laaw .'n I107IN : u:a, • FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Dec. 15 1999 02:30PM P4 b$/20/04 14:SS et 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL [I004/004 I lase i .r Or ••••*MOO A ;sue ■ ; 1 1 ws .+a.• .� .auO r 1111 7. =,...ice ...v. ,Y J ,'*Lwryr I . _. -- • ❑ • ..�I I. .l't 0 : ! , , rf 1 1\\s,:\sx . •••■•42.. ' 1 , I .r i V.Z. �•• •rwa•r/,M... ■ .- ' . • • ! i •il ii-1—",—. r I C ' . }i� r�f fSMraaaaa .; Az V e/ , • ,s-' 4�.�.i/.w ten.. t l j .• • 1 • 1� 'fir ANA ♦•j i t1 O rte.,. RED f\ i i I 1. r 1 . — AO OM • r e I t 1 Y r�r,at 1-1P7 a. •s.IR {!\j1��1/l slGF4Jn 4 it r_r 1 dr it I i r.l i• _®laZ+4 - possnamrcATA. we MONO — ..w♦ .ru 'ZL"•!5.7•_ Vg1111C/3.. RAE 3 • Ed wd9E:Z0 6661 9Z 1uT+r 9£9£ 729 £05 : .0.; XtJA SNItISSNIVF13 I O I N : 42214 FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 6B4 3636 Dec. 15 1999 02:3OPM P5 uuAca)ga ti.as ; a45 ells Ykll*. 1115YUSA1. 4003/004• I `�:, CaTOP sash e. ! 1 1 —....J r \ to. ' '3 �I \\ I � I I I I\ SWALE FOR W !ATER ,, I I " 4 ,ITT FOG1LtTTt \1 r OYEI�L0�11 " ' ' , 12'x to' r 12`16' I xf� 4 ! 1 r ti I S I I ' 1 I I 1 No' rjrsves.S1.4 z t.g - 7� i - _ I t SET BACK FROM I 1 _Till t 1 WETLAND 50024 ARY 1 1 r ' ;0 ' I ;� o , �� . . i ; `l 1.1$' x 20' scstr1`AII=D T� BICYCLE Si y t 1 '% --= ® �1 Du' TER 6TICLoeulez PAW1143 SPAZE U1/ CONCRETE $...A�. 3._. 't +� rtii \\ i° 9 GATES Si.IALL OI5T! ii l )� 4 DEYOND WV POSI71aNt-\ ' i .�� 1 MOD N OPEN POSITION. r I r It \ Vii- a r-vE • I E • , L+X15T1NG PEA TO ' `t� !�E 51 OCATED O ',` S �._S3 . $PC T S': 4' - S- AT -p'; '''O�� 3 AT 9 lit , SE fOVED. ti • I 1 U Ze I 1 „ U f'"OLF 1, \\ 1 r E I ■ 1 \ 1 r \ r I gxSTI CN!N Ll - I 1 r 1 - GE - TO , ,AI �1• I i Ii I - — -_-- - — r L E P,,7-40.... D rspofA.1 s v=P T'kC L6 Cfri..1 2d ud9Z:2A 6661 6e 'u^; 9E9E 709 COS : 'ON Y.:-.1d :INI2i3dNION'9 11MIN : WOM . _ 0 • 411.16-iqq -tco/3 4Ik4=A CITY OF TIGARD December 17, 1999 OREGON James Andrews Nicoli Engineering PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Meyer Sign Company Dear Mr. Andrews: This letter is to confirm that the Meyer Sign Company project has been approved with conditions. Because the application was reviewed and found to be consistent with the standards in effect at the time it was submitted, the approval will not be affected by the implementation of Title 3. Of course, if there are any changes to the site in the future, the changes must comply with all standards in effect at that time. I hope this addresses your concerns. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, ,— I Ate' (.. Julia Powell Hajdd Associate Planner i:curpin/julia/confirmation.doc c: 1999 Planning correspondence 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ► `I- C, L NI ,ENGINEvri6 I and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 AT TN: Julia Hajduk RE: Meyer Sign Company 15205 SW 70th Tigard, OR 97223 AR - 1999-00013 Job #99-0404 Dear Ms. Hajduk: This letter is to verify that the Meyer Sign Architectural Review application is complete. It is our understanding that this project site is now exempt from any future setback restrictions from the wetlands, etc., being discussed and shortly implemented by governing agencies and would be grandfathered in accordingly. Please notify this office by phone and in writing to confirm our understanding of the City's policy. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Property Manager JDA/cjb cc: Jim Hendriyx Director of Community Development Denny Meyer Property Owner of �� DR1999 000 /3 `r' "gip \ �' ` Uregon Division of State Lands Z, 775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97301-1279 John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor RECEIVED PLANNING (503)378-3805 FAX(503)378-4844 December 22, 1999 TTY(503)378-4615 DEC 2 3 1999 State Land Board Caroline Rim CITY OF TIGARD John A. Kitzhaber PHS Governor 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 Bill Bradbury Secretary of State Jim Hill Re: Wetland Delineation for Meyer Sign Companyof Oregon located State Treasurer in 2S, R1W, Section 12 in Tigard, Oregon; Det#99-0362 Dear Caroline: I have reviewed your wetland delineation report for the above-referenced site. Based on the data presented, I concur with your conclusions. The wetland areas mapped in Figure 5 of your report are subject to permit requirements of the state Removal-Fill Law(ORS 196.800-196.990). A state permit is required for fill or excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in the wetland area. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Federal or local wetland permit requirements may apply as well. The Army Corps of Engineers will review the report and make a determination for purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act at the time that a permit application is submitted. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to any subsequent DSL and Corps permit applications to speed application review. Local wetland permit requirements may apply as well. Division approval of wetland delineation reports is based upon the information provided to us. Should additional information be brought to our attention or should site conditions change, we would consider the new information and re-evaluate the site and our jurisdictional determination as needed. Please advise your client that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts may include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Division staff Bill Parks, Resource Coordinator on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. He can be reached at 503-378-3805 ext. 234 Thank you for your report. If I can answer any questions for you or your client, please do not hesitate to contact me at(503) 378-3805 ext. 233. Sincerely, Lake--- •nn- e a a Wetland Inventory Specialist Wetlands Program Enc. cc: Denny Meyer Jim Andrews City of Tigard, Planning Department Brian Lightcap, Corps of Engineers Bill Parks, DSL LWI file k:\wetl a n d s\a n n ette\ette rs\99-0372 m eye rs ig n s.d oc PH +14.,� Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. - 11'"1 LEGEND i . Air Potentially J \ jurisdictional wetland ��=�: —. .� �r� �� _ _ _ _ _ Wetland boundary • 1 Sample point 1 4 A Ain LOK PIM � N MP _.. .... A i J II \\T\ ,� LOT 14 ' •Olg.01 \l Ili / IIK \ ■ Oil P• 4I.A.._ A Aaj A 1 rr t I=\ U N 1/2 LOT 13 111 .11111 P . . . .11 >AO . A I ._ p 20 40 60 ISCALE IN FEET II 9- 1931 8/4/99 III Figure 5 : Locations of potentially jurisdictional wetland and sample points on the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (base map provided g by Andy Paris and Associates, Inc., 1999). ____ __ „1-7-7-7-Tros:57,::: : ::',. . ..:: . iii I t rw•�J L.L.__l—I._—__ 1. 1------UA_- 1 J---1-1--J r T :• ----- - -- .Qta LaQ i . lt L a _ � rt . 3 -P m Ini...g., A-- - . .::.:.:q:4:11: ::.R s r---\-- MI-� I E _ r :•. CARDINAL lit • 1 ,� ........ J , ill giV1 Wil:::::::.:„.\ )1 111 MONO ...-.-.. -EDW000 L ligarcilli I /ge ::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::......v.:.:TN.:.... iii na oi um ri: ... ' ilt'.CC .0141111.r= Ili r •y v111111 111!' ! : ::::•::f X : in Iinillii dA:mk_i:E:::::::::::::::....::::7/ illii. 0 . , IIIPIAANI��r.,• iii. _ MICr= _' PAi�y.��, :0. .:'11 1 K �P Marva ■....im.-- wr 1 1. rim, 1 41 . ;..___\---.1 0, CITY OF TIGARD m' -- - ` :::;:: lc WETLANDS INVENTORY ;� :::.: • :::•: • ° : 1. / � UNIT 8 . ri Identateo wetlands S / + A-t Welland ID ik ,_ k - - Agvattc Resource Un�l • (p�,:�-• rt,1--1 t-A_Boundat y r!/ _ \ O Wetlands Corridor -. Stream Wetlands yP° yecP01ic and Survey 3/1/99 9-1931 Figure 4. Local Wetlands Inventory information for the Meyer Signs development property on SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (City of Tigard, OR, 1995). Pacific Habitat Services,inc. FM ^ J' �iiiuul�t��;``�,'� CITY OF TIGARD OREGON August 22, 2000 Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering and Construction Services PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 Dear Mr. Andrews: In response to your August 17, 2000 letter, this letter is to verify that the Meyer Sign Building SDR (SDR1999-00013) expires on May 11, 2001 (18 months from the effective date of the decision). An extension may be requested in accordance with the standards in Section18.360.030.D. An extension must be requested and approved prior to the original expiration date. I hope that this letter addresses all of your questions. If not, feel free to contact me at 639-4171, x407 with additional questions. Sincerely, gt/de .0.44 ulia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:curpin/julia/sdr/meyers sign expiration confirmation.doc c: SDR1999-00013 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 r ENGINEERIN r�nQF TIGARD and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 August 17, 2000 NEI #: 98-0214 • Tu!ip Hajcliik Associate Pla"I'cr City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Meyer Sign Building 74th Ave., Tigard, OR Tax Map: 2S1 12DB Tax Lot: 600 SDR-1999-00013 VAR 1999-00022 Dear Julia, Mr. Meyer is postponing his project. We would like to verify the date that Mr. Meyer's application expires. If you would, at your convenience, please send me a letter for our files so I can notify Mr. Meyer of the expiration date. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA/cjb 4/24/01 Activities for Case #: SDR1999-00013 9:40:32 AM Assigned Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 To Done By Disp. Level By Updated Notes SDRA000 Case Review Menu PLL DONE No Hold PLL 4/24/01 Six-month extension of approval date granted on 4/24/01. The new expiration date is 10/25/01. SDRA007 Application received 7/20/99 JPH No Hold JPH 7/30/99 SDRA019 Assign planner JPH No Hold JPH 7/30/99 SDRA020 Application acceptance date JPH No Hold JPH 7/30/99 SDRA090 Review for completeness DONE No Hold JPH 12/16/99 SDRB225 Approval Final subj.to cond. 11/10/99 JPH DONE No Hold JPH 12/16/99 Page 1 of 1 April 25, 2001 4"''„k01lIU�illl�" James Andrews CITY OF TIGARD Nicoli Engineering, Inc 9025 SW Center Street OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Andrews: The City is in receipt of your request for a 6-month extension for SDR1999-00013 and VAR1999-00022. Chapter 18.360.030 part D of the City of Tigard Community Development Code states that an extension will be granted provided that: 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; No changes to the original site development review plan have been requested. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the extension period; By requesting an extension and paying the additional fee, the applicant has shown intent of initiating construction on the site within the six-month extension period. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. There have been no changes to the Comprehensive Plan policies since the SDR and Variance for this site were approved. Having met these three conditions, the City of Tigard grants the requested six-month extension for SDR1999-00013 and VAR1999-00022. The new expiration date will be October 25, 2001. Sincerely, a r7�,Jdi Ban urrent Planning City of Tigard /f ` Director's Initials 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 , Receipt #: 27200100000000001712 /� � Date: 04/24/2001 ;IL,/41"---/ T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due SDR1999-00013 [LANDUS]Approved Extension 100-0000-438000 $150.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check NICOLI ENGINEERING 0 10295 0 $150.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $150.00 'ICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. 10 2 95 City of Tigard 4/20/2001 Extension Fee 150.00 Bank of America SDR 1999-00013NAR 1999-00022 150.00 PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS. . . ■ Ilk Nicoli Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 - 9025 SW Center Street-Tigard,OR 97223 - (503)620-2086 fax:(503)684-3636 April 18, 2001 NEI#: 99-0404 RECEIVED PLANNING City of Tigard Planning Department APR 2 3 2001 AT TN: .rc•.k Ill c v..G..J\dorf, PI:7Inni n g M.2�.. nawge,r 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CITY OFTIGARD Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Meyer Building SW 74th Ave. Tigard, OR Tax Map: 2S112DB Tax Lot: 600 Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: We would like to request a 6-month extension for SDR1999-00013 and VAR1999-00022. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $150 for the extension fee. If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully Submitted,-- James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclosure cc: Sherman Casper, City of Tigard Permit Coordinator Denny Meyer, Owner Y.\1 9991J-9904041Letters\Externsion Request doc 1 Nicoll Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 January 22, 2002 NEI#: 01-0907 City of Tigard RECEIVED PLANNING Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager 13125 SW W Hall Hall Blvd JAN 2 3 2002 Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD RE: Meyer Sign Building 15205 SW 74th Ave Tigard Oregon SDR: 1999-00013 VAR: 1999-00022 Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: Our office was recently notified that the Site Development Review for the above noted project has expired. We believe that we have met the necessary requirements in order to maintain the SDR approval. The purpose of this letter is to clarify our position on this matter. In April of 2001 we requested an extension for this project. A mistake was made in our request. We requested and received a six-month extension when we meant to ask for the 1-year extension period. The expiration date, including the six-month extension, of October 25, 2001 was obtained from Mr. Casper, Permits Coordinator for the City of Tigard. It was our understanding that if we submitted for the Site Permit prior to the expiration date, that this action would be sufficient to maintain the SDR for the project. Submittal for a Site Permit was initiated prior to the SDR expiration. No notification of the expiration of the SDR was given at this time, therefore we believed that the SDR was still valid. In a recent discussion with Associate Planner, Brad Kilby, we where informed that our submitting for a Site Permit prior to the expiration date was not sufficient to maintain the SDR. Mr. Kilby directed me to Section 18.360.030 of the Development Code, regarding the approval period. As noted in this section, construction operations where required within 1 1/2 years. Although "substantial construction" is not defined, several construction activities have taken place on site to date. A wetland delineation survey was performed. A site survey was done to document the project's boundaries, floodplain, wetlands and site topography were also completed. Street improvement documents have been produced documenting facility extensions and street improvements. Physical construction activities include the installation of a security fencing around the site. Excavations where made on the site for determining soil conditions (these holes were filled in for safety reasons). Gravel was spread for construction activities. Finally, an X 1J-010907\Letters\Site Developement Review Clar,tication doc Page 1 of 2 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, OR 97223 _ www.nicoliengineering.com erosion control fence was installed by the owner, although not in the correct position, and therefore will need to be relocated per the approved plans. All of the above noted items are considered "construction activities", as designated by the Construction Specification Institute, Civil Engineers Association. Currently, the owner has secured bids for the site work and building shell and is waiting for bids on the tenant improvements. The project, although delayed by the owner for personal/financial reasons, is moving forward at this time. Contracts should be issued within 60 days. We request that you review the decision to expire SDR1999-00013 based on the above information If you have any further questions regarding this matter please contact our office. Thank your for your review and assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely, James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclosure cc: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner X\J-010907\Letters\Site Developement Review Clarrfication doc Page 2 of 2 January 24, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Nicoll Engineering, Inc. Attn: Jim Andrews PO Box 23784 v Tigard, OR 97281 RE: SDR1999-00013 and VAR 1999-00022 Dear Jim: At the direction of the Planning Manager, the City will honor the above approvals until April 25, 2002. That will constitute the one-year extension that you have requested. Pursuant to Section 18.120.030(A)(135) of the Tigard Development Code, "Substantial Improvement" is defined in the Tigard Development Code as: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either: a. Before the improvement or repair is started; or b. If the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. "Substantial improvement" is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not, however, include either: (1) Any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing state or local health, sanitary or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to ensure safe living conditions; or (2) Any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. As we discussed on the telephone, "Substantial Improvement" of the project must be completed by April 25, 2002. If you have any questions, call me at (503) 639- 4171 ext. 388. Sincerely, 74 Brad Kilby Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. : 503 684 3636; JAN-22-02 2:26PM; PAGE 1 !3 T0: CITY ,OF TI(ARD AT: 5036847207 I, 1 NicoIi Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax (503) 684-3636 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: January 22, 2002 TIME: 2:26 PM TO: Dick Bewersdorff PHONE: 503-639-4171 COMPANY: City of Tigard FAX: 503-598-1960 FROM: Jim Andrews PHONE: (503) 620-2086 FAX: (503) 684-3636 RE: Meyer Sign Building Number of pages including cover sheet: 3 Message Original will be mailed to you. SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. : 503 684 3636; JAN-22-02 2:27PM; PAGE 2/3 • • viiivNicoIi Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 January 22, 2002 NEI#: 01-0907 City of Tigard Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Meyer Sign Building 15205 SW 74th Ave Tigard Oregon SDR: 1999-00013 VAR: 1999-00022 Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: Our office was recently notified that the Site Development Review for the above noted project has expired. We believe that we have met the necessary requirements in order to maintain the SDR approval. The purpose of this letter is to clarify our position on this matter. In April of 2001 we requested an extension for this project. A mistake was made in our request. We requested and received a six-month extension when we meant to ask for the 1-year extension period. The expiration date, including the six-month extension, of October 25, 2001 was obtained from Mr. Casper, Permits Coordinator for the City of Tigard. It was our understanding that if we submitted for the Site Permit prior to the expiration date, that this action would be sufficient to maintain the SDR for the project Submittal for a Site Permit was initiated prior to the SDR expiration. No notification of the expiration of the SDR was given at this time, therefore we believed that the SDR was still valid. In a recent discussion with Associate Planner, Brad Kilby, we where informed that our submitting for a Site Permit prior to the expiration date was not sufficient to maintain the SDR. Mr. Kilby directed me to Section 18.360.030 of the Development Code, regarding the approval period. As noted in this section, construction operations where required within 1 'r4 years. Although "substantial construction" is not defined, several construction activities have taken place on site to date. A wetland delineation survey was performed. A site survey was done to document the project's boundaries, floodplain, wetlands and site topography were also completed. Street improvement documents have been produced documenting facility extensions and street improvements. Physical construction activities include the installation of a security fencing around the site. Excavations where made on the site for determining soil conditions (these holes were filled in for safety reasons). Gravel was spread for construction activities. Finally, an x11-010aOTLntlenn54te Dayalapement Ra+Mw Cl.ficaborictoc Pave♦of 2 9025 SW Center Street Tigard,OR 97223 — www.nicolienglneering.com SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING, INC. ; 503 684 3636; JAN-22-02 2:27PM; PAGE 3/3 erosion control fence was installed by the owner, although not in the correct position, and therefore will need to be relocated per the approved plans. All of the above noted items are considered "construction activities", as designated by the Construction Specification Institute, Civil Engineers Association. Currently, the owner has secured bids for the site work and building shell and is waiting for bids on the tenant improvements. The project, although delayed by the owner for personal/financial reasons, is moving forward at this time. Contracts should be issued within 60 days. We request that you review the decision to expire SDR1999-00013 based on the above information. If you have any further questions regarding this matter please contact our office. Thank your for your review and assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely, James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclosure cc: Brad Kilby, Associate Planner x.UAt W07lLeDef6lSrte Developer»nl RNiew C'Irrlraoon.hx Page 2 d 2 .__---04/10;2002 09:12 FAA. 50363472t7 city or iigara iallfiJZ 1/10/02 CITY OF '�'XGA 9:04:38AM ,,<„_,,�,I 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • : Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 • fette4-Conditions Associated with Case#: SD 1999-00013 72 r CONDITION STATUS STATUS ORDER It CONDITION TITLE/WORDING STATUS' DA1E�� BY Prior to any site work,submit confirmation from DSL and US army Copr of Engineers that no permits are • required or that permits have been obtained. ' mye ,;2.00 . FENCE§p:H2Q,'BUFFET „i Prior to any site work,clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure tht the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. • ,.3.00 TREE PROTECT FENCING` 4 ' N f Prior to any site work,tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during contraction. 4.00 REVISED SITE PLAN M 12/16/99 JPH 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. 5.00 ROW GROUNDCOVER M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover,and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 fcct in height and achieves a balance of low growing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in the vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. 6.00 WLKWAY PAVED W/HARD SURFACE M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. 7.00 WASTER HAULER APPROVAL M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. • .g)$.00 ,--,DEDIGATEEASEMENTAW IiN4 Dedicate an easement within the ploodpalin 30 ffet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff contact:Duane Roberts(x347)for easement language. 9.00 F-PLAT APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS ? N Prior to approval of the final plat,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5)sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. (NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements). Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard_or.us). 10.00 COMP AGRMNTIS ASSURANCE INFO I QD R N • As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person..Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11.00 ADDRESSING FEE 4 e, N i Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. PingeascCond.rpt Page: 1 of 2 Nicoll Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 LETTER OF TRANSM EI , • •• ° JOB NO DI_bq 0 ATTENTION ► . �r FEB 20 '- ct/�-o� RE_ TO t,c. `IN OF TI c • • , I ,NGIEN • FiiNC _--- ----- --• WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via The following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans Li Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Other: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 12.•1(0 • C3t 2 (..ova. vi ati.w+ 1 i. .� c4 1 12 . 2x1,°l1 1 v 1 4� -/-5te to t-444.4 4D. 0 2 I `(4 (241 fie c "LifrAcLCbiM,..o 641.iircAce,0 W` CiAt.1, 4s. s Lang-00ot3 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ For approval El Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit Copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit - Copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return Corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Other: ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS IS.GG.e.- ate.e- i,c ,cce �.t� t 14„ �GV�c - t��x�•� ,L1/(v COPY TO SIGNED: Division of State Lands Yegon ° 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97301-1279 9 John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor (503)378-3805 • FAX(503)378-4344 TTY(503)378-4615 December 29, 1999 �--- 1 C i ` ~; State Land Board John A.Kitzhaber Governor JD02/NSP-18959 DENNY MEYER Bill Bradbury 7340 SW LANDMARK LANE Secretary of3tate TIGARD OR 9724 Jim Hill State Treasurer RE: State File No. NSP-18959 Dear Mr. Meyer: We have received your application to place a storm water drainage pipe within a wetland buffer area to discharge water into the 100-year flood plain (Section 12, Township 1S, Range 1W) in Washington County, Oregon. The Division of State Lands requires a permit if you plan to remove, fill or alter 50 cubic yards or more of material within the banks of most waters of the state. State designated Essential Salmon Habitat streams and State Scenic Waterways are exceptions in that any amount of removal, fill or alteration typically requires a permit. Based on your application, your project involves removal or filling of less than 50 cubic yards of material IN WATERS THAT ARE NOT CURRENTLY DESIGNATED Essential Salmon Habitat or State Scenic Waterways; therefore, a State removal-fill permit is not required. You must also receive authorization, when required, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and local planning department before beginning construction. If you have any questions, please call me at 503-378-3805, extension 234. Sincerely, William L. Parks Natural Resource Coordinator Field Operations—Western Region WLP:jed J:\AttachmentAwest\NSP No State Permit Requried\NSP-18959.doc c: Jan Stuart, Corps of Engineers City of Tigard Planning • Nicoli Engineering 02/20/2002 08:38 FAX 503808437' CENWP-OP-G 0 002 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ne, \ NORTHWESTERN DIVISION,CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 2870 •/ POR AND,OREGON 8720 -2870 o`% December 16, 1999 `'4a�nsu'n- Attolntlon of Operations Division SC SC SUBJECT: Permit Application ID No: 99-1534 PM TL PM 1 Denny Meyer TE 7340 SW Landmark Lane -.l,P Tigard, Oregon 97224 Dear Mr. Meyer: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)has evaluated your application to install a stormwater pipe within the buffer of Fanno Creek, Tigard, Washington County, Oregon (Section S.E. 21 T2S/R 1 W,Tax Map 2S 112DB,Tax Lot 600). The Corps has reviewed the wetland delineation prepared for you by Pacific Habitat Services and concurs with the delineation. This , wetland jurisdictional delineation is valid for a period of five years from the date of this letter or unless new information warrants revision of the delineation before the expiration date. The Corps has jurisdiction over water bodies under two statutory authorities: the River and Harbor Act and the Clean Water Act. Under Section 10 of the River and Harbors Act of 1899,the Corps has authority to issue permits for structures, work(including excavation) in,or affecting navigable waters of the United States. Limits of jurisdiction extend to the mean high water mark in tidally influenced areas and to the ordinary high water mark in non-tidal but navigable waters. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Corps has authority to issue permits for the placement of fill or dredged material in waters of the United States. The term "waters of the United States" includes the territorial seas and tidally influenced waters up to the high tide line. "Waters" also include all other waters,up to their ordinary high water mark, that are part of a surface tributary system to and including navigable(non-tidal) waters of the United States. Other wetlands are also "waters of the United States". Since your project does not involve the placement of fill material into waters of the United States, a Department of the Army permit is not required. 02/20/2002 08:38 FAX 5038084375 CENWP-OP-G Q1003 -2- If you have any questions regarding our regulatory authority,please contact Jan Stuart at the above address or telephone(503) 808-4381. Sincerely, "rence C. Evans Chief, Regulatory Branch Copy Furnished: Oregon Department of State Lands(Parks) Environmental Protection Agency(Vallette) Pacific Habitat Services (Rim) 4/29/02 A CITY OF TIGARD /29/0 6PM I s„ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR1999-00013 CONDITION STATUS STATUS ORDER# CONDITION TITLE/WORDING STATUS* DATE BY 1.00 CNFRMATION FROM DSL&USACE M 2/20/02 BMK Prior to any site work,submit confirmation from DSL and US army Copr of Engineers that no permits are required or that permits have been obtained. 2.00 FENCE 50'H2O BUFFER N Prior to any site work,clearly mark the 50-foot water resources buffer on site with construction fencing to insure tht the buffer is maintained free of debris and disturbance. 3.00 TREE PROTECT FENCING N Prior to any site work,tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during contruction. 4.00 REVISED SITE PLAN M 12/16/99 JPH 4. Submit a revised plan that shows the northern most street tree to be planted will be located outside of the vision clearance area. 5.00 ROW GROUNDCOVER M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a revised landscape plan that shows groundcover,and shrubs will be located between the parking lot and the street that provides a screen up to 3 feet in height and achieves a balance of low growing and vertical shrubbery. The revised plan must insure that all vegetation in the vision clearance areas will not be located between 3 feet and 8 feet in height. 6.00 WLKWAY PAVED W/HARD SURFACE M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the walkway will be paved with a hard surface material. 7.00 WASTER HAULER APPROVAL M 12/16/99 JPH Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. 8.00 DEDICATE EASEMENT N Dedicate an easement within the ploodpalin 30 ffet wide measured from the floodplain line towards the creek. Staff contact:Duane Roberts(x347)for easement language. 9.00 F-PLAT APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS N Prior to approval of the fmal plat,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5)sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. (NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements). Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 10.00 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD N As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person.Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11.00 ADDRESSING FEE M 4/29/02 DCP Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.pd Recpt#2002-1558 PingCaseCond.rpt Page: 1 of 2 RETRUN RECORDED DOCU 'T TO: CITY HALL RECORDS DEPA .QENT, CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. p�J'"� µ'°°ms PiJME Tigard,OR 97223 N-J �riE„a INDIVIDUAL — �,5 t5 T , —14 i 0,4, ' 3x. .4' -r,. BR-".(l`t File No. SDR 1999-00013 DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space above reserved for Washington County Recording informa Danni a C;_ MQyPr & Mary E. Mayer does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street,road,and utility purposes on,over, across,under,along, and within the following described real property in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $0.00. However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this 3rd day of October ,20 02 di / J - Signatlue / Signature 15205 SW 74th Ave. 15205 SW 4t Tax Statement Mailing Address Property Address. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 10/03/02 (date)by: Dennis G. Meyer & Mary Meyer (name of person(s)). r.\\ f n t.117%, OFFICIAL SEAL 'WI. I 1. �>>!� ROBERT K CHURCHILL otary's Signature .:.. - [`O MAMISS ONLN()0360032 i I ..r. HARRIS - McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS 12555 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD OREGON, 97223 TEL. (503) 639-3453 FAX. (503) 639-1232 June 24, 2002 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE PURPOSE OF THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS TO DESCRIBE LAND TO BE DEDICATED AS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS APPROVED IN CASE FILE No. SDR 1999- 00013 EFFECTING THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 13 AND ALL OF LOT 14 OF THE PLAT OF "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS", SITUATED IN THE S.E. QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2-SOUTH, RANGE 1-WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. THE DEDICATION IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS" THE EAST 45 FEET OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 13 AND THE EAST 45-FEET OF LOT 14 OF THE "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS" PLAT. CONTAINING: 11006 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS, TOTAL ADJUSTED AREA. i I5 S 89'59'55' E 40' T/L 600 529.92' 5.0 FT. 45 50' 30' DEDICATION— r () O J C A U .� 70 D 0 LA DC 14 I `" D -c N Q H N n '11 o d I J0 0 N ILI DEED DOCUMENT No. 2000097892 cn V o AC Z U 1 N ND v W J2420. rk U 539.48' 4 ' 0P° TA 700 O S 89'59'55' E �r z z 13 DEED DOCUMENT No. 97052108.1 Z N O 12 lD g f EXHIBIT 'A ' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION SKETCH N TAXMAP: 2S1 12 DB TAXLOT: 00600 E s HARRIS—McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223-6287 PHONE: (503) 639-3453 FAX: (503) 639-1232 JUNE 24, 2002 SCALE: 1 "=100' RETRUN RECORDED DOCUII TO: Was►• 'n County,Oregon 2003-000015 01/C 3 09:58:09 AM CITY HALL RECORDS DEPART wIENT, D-DD Crtt=1 Stnatg J STEEL CITY OF TIGARD $15.00$6.00$11.00-Total a$32.00 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 111111111111 11111111111111111 11I INDIVIDUAL 00232720200300000150030037 I,Jerry Hanson,Director ofA merit and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of y �� writing was received and recorded In the book of f' records of said county. File No. 1999-00013 Jerry R.Hanson,Directorste7sment nd Taxation, Ex-Officio County Clerk DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space above reserved for Washington County Recording informa nPnn i s C.% MPyPr & Mary F_ MPyPr does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street,road,and utility purposes on, over,across,under, along,and within the following described real property in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $0.00. However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this 3rd day of October ,20 02 om , . Signature Signature 15205 SW 74th Ave. 15205 SW 4t Tax Statement Mailing Address Property Addrr'ss` Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 10/03/02 (date)by: Dennis G. Meyer & Mary Meyer (name of person(s)). �.�t .� ^!" OFFICIAL SEAL 1 t�\ r;—F ROBERT K CHURCHILL.� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON O�fli�i Signature COMMISSION NO.36033II My Commission E xpires: D U - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 4,2006 �+p Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this I-■ day of, I j Ce.rr1 kl.tn, 20 O.2_, . f (/City Engineer IENGIPtbkc foma\DedicationDeedROWIndv.dot HARRIS - McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS 12555 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD OREGON, 97223 TEL. (503) 639-3453 FAX. (503) 639-1232 June 24, 2002 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE PURPOSE OF THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS TO DESCRIBE LAND TO BE DEDICATED AS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS APPROVED IN CASE FILE No. SDR 1999- 00013 EFFECTING THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 13 AND ALL OF LOT 14 OF THE PLAT OF "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS", SITUATED IN THE S.E. QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2-SOUTH, RANGE 1-WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. THE DEDICATION IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS" THE EAST 45 FEET OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 13 AND THE EAST 45-FEET OF LOT 14 OF THE "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS" PLAT. CONTAINING: 11006 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS, TOTAL ADJUSTED AREA. l 11111111111 1 111 2003-15 • I 2003-15 1 15 S 89'59'55" E 40' T/L 600 529.92' 5.0 FT. 45 50' 30' DEDICATION 0 J F-- _ U D rn O w I rn 1 —/ 14 - � D N O� 1 N • 1_1 In o .4 ? 1 ?0 Cl N W DEED DOCUMENT No. 2000097892 .o _ o o OZ .- O Z U N 70 - - - -d o w W^/ 25' 20' U 539.48' S' •63 T/L 700 O S 89'59'55" E -0\' z z 13 Q DEED DOCUMENT No. 97052108.1 U- Z 12 EXHIBIT •A • RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION SKETCH N TAXMAP: 2S1 12 DB TAXLOT: 00600 w c S HARRIS—McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS 12555 S.W. HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223-6287 PHONE: (503) 639-3453 FAX: (503) 639-1232 JUNE 24, 2002 SCALE: 1 "=100' ihc.(ER Si c-a sCR. 1qC — 00011 0 LA DSCAPING COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT C AGREEMENT dated the �IFTH day of fJcYEM86R. , 20 6 between the CITY OF TIGARD,a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter termed the "CITY", and r lass k Dturais pike it- hereinafter termed "Petitioner". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Petitioner has applied to the City for approval of a project known as Meyer Sign Company Building, City land use case number SDR1999-00013 located in Section 12,Township 2 South, Range 1 West„Willamette Meridian,Washington County, Oregon;and WHEREAS,the City has adopted the Petitioner who has been conditioned to install landscaping as a part of Petitioner's development ;and WHEREAS,the landscaping;as a part of Petitioner's development is incomplete, and Petitioner has nonetheless requested the City to permit occupancy and use of property in the development, and the parties desire hereby to protect the public interest generally by legally enforceable assurances that the landscaping and trash enclosure will be completed as required within the time hereinafter set forth. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the covenants and agreements to be kept and performed by the Petitioner and its sureties, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: (1) Petitioner shall proceed with development, with the intent and purpose to complete landscaping not later than thirty(90)days from the date of this agreement. (2) To assure compliance with the City's requirements and the provisions herein, Petitioner tenders to the City a surety bond in form approved by the City, with liability in the amount of$ 19,000.00 a copy of which is attached and by this reference made a part hereof. (3) In the event that Petitioner shall fail,neglect or refuse to proceed with the landscaping work in an orderly and progressive manner to assure completion within the time limits, upon ten (10) days notice by the City to Petitioner , and such default and failure to proceed continuing thereafter, the City may at its option proceed to have the work completed and charge the costs hereof against Petitioner deposit and in the event action be brought,. Petitioner promise and agree to pay, in addition to the amounts accruing and allowable, such sum as the court shall adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees and costs incurred by the City, both in the Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any, or the City may, at its option, bring proceedings to enforce against the Petitioner specific performance of the contract, and in such event, in like manner, the City shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court shall adjudge reasonable as and for the City attorney's fees and costs,both in the Trial Court and Appellate Court, if any. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Petitioner acting by and through its duly authorized undersigned officers pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors has caused this agreement to be executed, and the City acting pursuant to resolution of its Council adopted at a regularly scheduled meeting on the 13th day of October , 19 86, has caused this agreement to be executed by the Community Development Director PETIT ■alb_ 0 I • (Title) fts2, OFFICIAL SEAL svi � ^ ROBERT K CHURCHILL THE CITY OF NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON. , : COMMISSION NO.360032 • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 4,2006 , By _ Community Developm irector (Attached Notary Acknowledgement hereto) Return signed copy to: PERFORMANCE BOND Bond No. 551646S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENCE, that we Mary k Penn;s Meyer- as Principal, and Indemnity Company of California , a corporation duly authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon, as Surety, are jointly and severally held bound unto the City of Tigard, Oregon, a municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called obligee, in the sum of $19,000, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which we, as Principal, and as Surety, jointly and severally bind ourselves, our successors and assigns firmly by these present. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS BOND AND OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that the Principals are constructing a development known as Meyer Sign Company Building, located in the City of Tigard, Oregon, and have entered into a Landscaping Compliance Agreement with respect to timely completi,7n of landscaping, a ropy of said Agreement is attached, and by reference made a part hereof; and NOW, THEREFORE, if the Principal herein shall faithfully and truly observe and comply with all terms of the Agreement and shall well and truly perform all matters and things undertaken to be performed under said Agreement and under all ordinances, regulations and conditions of the Obligee applicable to said development and improvement, and shall promptly make payments to all persons supplying labor or material for any of the work provided by said agreement, and shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecuted against the Obligee, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond, in addition to all other rights and remedies, the City, in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this ctc-r4 day of 1 cod EvNi £.R. , 2000- . --°--'( I By (Title) O Indemnity Company of California Ilk` \/ urety J /..� �, OFFICIAL SEAL ...:I 1 '���- — • Cynthi,-� MohrAttorney in Fact `} ,. . ROBERT K CHURCHILL �:, NOTARY PUBLIC-0REGON Five Centerpointe, Suite 530 �,;� � COMMISSION NO.360032 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 4,2008 Lake Oswego, Address 97035 e • POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA PO BOX 19725,IRVINE,CA 92623•(949)263-3300 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that except as expressly limited.DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA.do each,hereby make,constitute and appoint: ***Brian Dooney, Judy Price, Cynthia Mohr, jointly or severally*** as their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact,to make,execute,deliver and acknowledge,for and on behalf of said corporations,as sureties,bonds,undertakings and contracts of suretyship giving and granting unto said Attorney(s)-in-Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary. requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do,but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation,and all of the acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact,pursuant to these presents,are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Board of Directors of DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,effective as of November 1,2000: RESOLVED,that the Chairman of the Board,the President and any Vice President of the corporation be,and that each of them hereby is.authorized to execute Powers of Attorney,qualifying the attorney(s)named in the Powers of Attorney to execute,on behalf of the corporations,bonds,undertakings and contracts of suretyship: and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the corporations be,and each of them hereby is,authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney: RESOLVED,FURTHER,that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures shall be valid and binding upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA have severally caused these presents to be signed by their respective Executive Vice President and attested by their respective Secretary this 81h day of January.2002. By _ .'' AND jqO,. OP AN Y M Ox• David H.Rhodes,Executive Vice President OPPORy 0 Ait/cif.Z.044 E W OCT. <3 Z 2 OCT.5 '°9T =a 10 nc O 'o= 1936 it? w 1967 D:t By Walter A.Crowell. Secretary .9. P. .) „ 0/ -14 -a *.. STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On January 8,2002.before me,Antonio Alvarado,personally appeared David H. Rhodes and Walter A.Crowell.personally known to me(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,and that by their signatures on the instrument the entity upon behalf of which the nersons acted.executed the instrument" WITNESS and official seal. Q +� ANTONIO ALVARADO _ � ,�i�,�: OMM.J/1300303 e� Notary Public-California 5 ORANGE COUNTY Signature �' � My Comm.Expires APRIL 10, 005 CERTIFICATE The undersigned,as Chief Operating Officer of DEVELOPERS SURETY AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, does hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked,and furthermore,that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attorney,are in force as of the date of this Certificate. This Certificate is executed in the City of Irvine,California,the 5th day of November 2002 By 4 David G.Lane,Chief Operating Officer ID-1380(01/02) • RETI IRN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: tit r-HALI.RECORDS DEPARTMENT Washing ,unty,Oregon •C;T1.OFT1GARD 05/15/2002 10:21:15 AM 2002-056753 13125 SW Hall Blvd. D-E Cnt■1 Stn■13 I REED Tigard,OR 97223 $15.00$6.00$11.00 -Total=$32.00 CORPORATION 00100636200200567530030039 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of Auesament and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, o �,;�,, +' do hereby certify that the within Instrument of writing :t••..-... :.*, was received and recorded In the bo k of records of • �'"' 7" S Ol 2 I Iq9—d o0 L said county. '' ' � � File No )4.usso,. ,, ;: Jerry R.Hanson,Director sment and Taxation, %'7itk Ex-Officio County Clerk L0 1\ EASEMENT BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY CVtHH N t 5 ivI s Y 1✓e- Fl 1 C� 'O. hereinafter called the Grantors, grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement over, across, and under the land and real property described in the attached Exhibit "A"" for a bicycle way and pedestrian way, which tliey be used by pedesti rats and non-rnororized mechanical means of transportation, such as bicycles and for no other purposes. The Grantee shall have the right to place, construct, operate, replace, maintain, inspect, reconstruct, install necessary improvements, and in connection therewith may remove any trees,shrubs,or brush necessary or convenient to accomplish said purposes. THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the right of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors,their successors,and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors, and assigns forever. q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this 2:7.- Alf,-- day of � ,- II— 19 ' E 1 , 4,J pia/ ; `'L` Name of Corporation Signature 73 10 s k) v r Q m c t \-C lam, M a r 1 i ._ Address n /v� Title J/��ard( � c 9 7,3-�� Signature Title STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ICC C 1uk - .0 ii ti(date)by_b t)l.3 () • it k V (name(s)of person(s))as 'tn".«'C{L 7 ` - _ (type of authority,e.g,,officer,trustee,etc) of 11 I' L L. 1L l l-'Y t (name of party •n behalf of whom instrum- wail execut ), OF f-.e.;. sFF1 L S Ay 1 ''�� Notary's Signature-��^f;�)- NOTARY PU L�C- OREGON hh.... � �p� 1 `,.�,� COMMISSION N0. 060219 My Commission-Expires: r'VN.,• ,�D MY � SCION FXPIAF6 JAN.20,2001 `' 2.00 2. Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this '2G day of F� l ,ter . ad- P City E Seer I:\ENGIPUB-FORM\B I KPD-CO.DOT Exhibit A Bikeway and Pedestrian Easement Legal Description for Meyer Sign Bikeway and pedestrian easement for the property being lot 14 and the north 1/2 of lot 13 "Fanno Creek Acre Tracts" in the southeast 1/4 section 12, T.2S. R1W W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Beginning at the southeast corner of the property designated by a 5/8" I.P. with RPC mark "REPETO LS657" and going along the southern property line S 89°, 51' 48" W for a distance of 248.00', which is the southeastern corner of the said easement and true point of beginning. Thence N 02° 05' 10" W a distance of 125.66' thence N 20° 00' 44" W fora distance of 126.16', thence S 89° 51' 48" W a distance of 40.00', thence S 20° 00' 44" E for a distance of 126.08' thence S 02° 05' 10" E for a distance of 125.75 thence N 89° 51' 48" E for a distance of 40.00' which is the southeast corner of the 40' wide easement. I II 1111111111 11111 i:lerg'dianef y doc n ertslbikeway and pedestrian easement legal meyer sign.doc 2002-56753 1 I \Nicoll LOT 14 ; I I ;;.1 _4. ..1. ,,3 I 9325 St CNrta-Tgnt 0.p 97223 EAT 1 (�k5^0.1A^)41-2091 +~J .cr L4p 10-ALDER `._ ___ 25_DEpO. 40.49-i I f: 4 '1 99FYli eouoAar :1• �a .- -•:-•4•015•17-•••: 99�i �• ; 3 1i .G�=?,. _ ----- — I F.IF,I — i.1lJO wwE LW PENCE li T LNCIBI2 I. GRAVEL INANE.. I it.l LNC 14 SH 0„,\ N ,1 a oastln AC. 1 .: \ eldfAvEL g\ - LOT>a ,, j IRLMOI ------_-I I'■ / U1I I• :7111 tat I O „o,. in LET LAIC4I co I I N OCTWARY f L �.. N1/2 LOT 13 ��m I I I N 't � f Pao EtI: �" j I I NEW BULDP wer JO R'�� / ■ 11 I j MEYE�s co. LET LAND. Ell I 15205$l'74,AYE. 1 i r.y<a aeyoe ar1.a I Lµwrc w� • • `: . �B" 1.P. W/RPC MARKED • •awe ` 40.00' ■N et■N./ I al>rc 'EPErO LS657" SET MT LAIC* 1°¢ N 89 51 48'E L;�,� 5/8" I.P. W/RPC UA,4K�� DENNEY AEYEfl REPETO LS657 O 0'1• TIGARD, OREGON 97224 LANE r-EASEI.4a T % I 81/2 LOT 13 7 SITE PLAN - BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN EASEMEt T I Dols• Scala 4-12-02 Dram by DJ, Checked by .DA Job Na: 01-0907 LEGEND 5 10 20 0 a•^9 No.: a¢EA�uur3 T • na te,.T raa° —4-- WE MICE —4.— 04AN LW W,0AaY&WAY Ate To.OGAAM10 LPONIANCN PREMED BIKEWAY AND BY ANDY PAP*APO A•60CLATl1,S.C.N DATED.A!!1.TM .r,L..o OCTp.MATwa4..0 DEL HEATON a v0Aa.Oro e ' PEDESTRIAN WAY •rw PAwEO CT•..GAG MANTAT SEINGEll Nc SHEET FYI-IIRIT A 01/08/2003 08:39 5036207074 MEYER SIGN COMPANY PAGE 02 01/06/2004 22:$0 r n08 TRYON CREEK LANDSC PAGE 01 ' 21 PROPOSAL • NO PtEr-02-2'r1 • TRXON•CREEK•LANDSCAPE,INC. 01/06/03 11400 s.w.NORTH DAKOTA ST. TIGARD.DRAGON 97223 wew•tryoautenk.com . . (503)624-2174•Fw1(303)624.9650 1.0340 11525&6296 f nlpclsnl Sut)cr iIti'd To! To 13c; Perior111e1! Al• ! Name Street 1 Street MEYER SI1311 CO. City SAME City 152 SW 74TH AVE State Staff T I GRD Bute ORB N 97224 Phone phone (500) 620-8200 FAX (503) 620-7074 • i TCL egress tti provide sit labor,materiels end equipment necessary to complete the following work, I I. IBB�ALL FREES AND SHRUBS AS FOLLOWS: A. 3 2" CALIPER RED SUNSET MAPLES ON EAST SIDE OF BUILDING ALONG ' STREET- 1 TO THE NORTH SIDE OP ENTRY, 2 TO THE SOUTH R. 4 1 1/2" CALIPER RAYWOOD ASH TREES IN SIDEWALK BEDS Al' FRONT ENTRY (SOUTH SIDE) OF BUILDING C. 2 1 1/2" CALIPER SWEET GUM TREES ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF PARKING LOT D. ' 4 4/5' TALL EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE TO SCREEN UTILITY BOX- AREA BY FENCE. 12 PORTUGAL LAUREL TO HIDE REMAINING UTILITY BOXES E. 125 1 GAL LOWFAST COTONEASTER GROUND COVER (36" O.C. ) IN OPEN AREA TO EAST OF BUILDING F. 40 1 GAL KINNICKINICE IN 2 BEDS FLANKING ENRTY DRIVEWAY (24" 0.C. ) G. 140 1 GAL MAHONIA REPANS-CREEPING OREGON GRAPE-S. SIDE OF PARKING LOT H. ' STAKE AND TIE TREES, FERTILIZE ALL WHEN PLANTING II . INS ALL 3" OP BARKDUST IN BEDS IN SIDEWALK AT ENTRY SIDE OF BUILDING *CLBANU , POWERWASH AND HAUL AWAY ANY EXCESS MATERIAL! Sc.) 1cc9 — oOe FINAL APPROVAL CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION p 1/ BY DR% -• DATE ( 1g f o TCL QWran all of he plenl'took and Its irrigation syeterra for o paned OI one year from the data of planting or inslallar .tad Warrants that n yysl moans or ranalr del Ire Items,duNlg Mal time pe000 as It deems appropriate and eubleci to the customer DrovWirlg apprlptlate n: 5.tarlanca tott:pwl't I'mld4,10n Oil maraItala Ora guaranteed to conform in inoustry atartlarda aria 1/4 above wont will be parlormed In aocuntn. with M•/drawings Rvbmined by lb*`wtlbner d.by TOL for the above wane and will be completed In a substantial woriungn Mks rnannar for ale 1(S ) 4,915.00 win paym•nta to 65 MOO as!WOWS; HALF DOWN, BALANCE ON COMPLETION OF WORY. The Real airmen la ems**Ns 7 toys of Flnat invofae.All peal due payments all bail.Irtiareet at the MN of 1e% r dtnygt,11-h4!b r fi(.a army LICENSURE:The contractor is licsneod by the Oregon Landscape Contreoten1 700 Summer St.N6,P.O.Box 14140,Salem,Oregon 97309-5062,telephone:(54 )37 -6821 fleep.ctfdliiy pubmttte•Ni g" Date . 0 Not •Thia pr• y be withdrawn by TCL if not sccspted . 0 days. THE GENERAL TERMS AND Jr��t, � y , CONDITIONS SET FORTH ON THE HALL BE CONSIDERED ` REVERSE S t,t� r� PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. . February 6, 2003 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Dennis G. & Mary Elizabeth Meyer 7340 SW Landmark Lane Tigard, OR 97224 RE: SDR1999-00013 and VAR 1999-00022 Dear Denny: This letter serves as written acknowledgement that the City of Tigard has no further interest in the nineteen thousand dollars and zero cents ($19,000.00) Bond #551646S between Mary and Dennis Meyer , the Indemnity Company of California, and the City of Tigard, Oregon. All work under this assurance has been satisfactorily completed. If you have any questions, call me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 2434. Sinc rely, Brad Kilby, AICP Associate Planner C: Indeminity Company of California, C/O Cindy Mohr, Five Centerpointe, Suite 530, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 C: File SDR1999-00013 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772