Loading...
MMD2000-00023 MMD2000 - 00023 REMBOLD PROPERTIES - TIGARD TRIANGLE October 2, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD Loy Rusch MCM Architects OREGON 1022 SW Salmon St., Suite 350 Portland, OR 97205 Dear Mr. Rusch: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification (MMD2000-00023) approval to construct a small one-story receiving shed in the paved service yard at the north end (rear) of the building. It is our understanding that you wish to construct this structure to provide a secured location in which to receive merchandise before moving the products to locations within the store. The Tigard Community Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states; "if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, that the request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application." Section 18.330.020.B.2 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal will add an approximately 600 square foot receiving shed which will house materials that have been delivered to the site and not moved onto the floor yet. Because the shed will not result in an increase in sales area, no additional trips will be generated and no additional on-site parking would be necessary. In any event, the site has adequate parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the building is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No change in the height of the building is proposed, therefore, this standard is not applicable. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. This request will not require a change in accessways or parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The location is in the rear where trucks will deliver materials to the store. The shed is out of the way of the truck route, therefore, this criterion is met. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ..1. • f 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. This modification will not generate additional vehicle trips. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will only add an additional 600 square feet to the site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. The modification will not affect landscaping or open space, therefore, this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The additional receiving shed will not affect project amenities. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The modification will not impact any of the conditions of approval. In addition, the proposed structure design is in conformance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards because it will be constructed of similar materials as the remainder of the building and is in alignment with the east face of the Poppy Box garden buildings. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE BUILDING DIVISION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171, ext. 407. Sincerely, Julia Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpl\Julia\minmod\mmd2000-00023.doc c: MMD2000-00023 Land Use file SDR 1999-00016 Land Use file 10.31/00 08:55 FAX el001 • 5�2 (999 - pool/ MCMii rc 1022 SW SALMON ST,SUITE 350- PORTI-AND,OREGON 97209 -USA TELEPHONE 503 222 5757- FAX 503 241 1514- w'W_MCMARCHITECT$.COM COMMUNIQUE DISTRIBUTION: VIA: DATE. October 31,2000 File Lundervold,GI-1C TO: Julia Hajduk O'Donnell,Poppybox City of Tigard Planning Department NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: 684-7297 PROJECT NUMBER' 99015 VIA: Fax FILE NAME: Hajduk=lO-31-99=CofO-doc PROJECT Rembold Tigard Triangle FROM: Doug Benson Temporary Certificate of Occupancy The General Contractor for the Tigard Triangle project is in the process of obtaining final sign off for all of the improvements in order for the Poppybox store to receive a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy to allow the store to open next week. The job superintendent, Gary Lundervold has probably already called you to set up your review. However, I wanted to give you an overview of the outstanding issues in advance of your visit to make your effort easier and allow you to request any clarifications of me prior to the final review. We are hoping you can visit the site in the next day or so in order to obtain the sign-off and move the TCO forward. When I spoke to you last week at City Hall, I mentioned that the stair from in front of the Poppybox store up to 72nd was proving to be more complex than expected given the problems we encountered with the stability of the rock and keystone walls along the eastern boundary of the project. Our solution to the problem has been to change the stair from a poured in place concrete stair requiring extensive excavation to a steel stair that can be lifted in to place with minimal excavation required. This stair is taking longer to build than we had hoped. We anticipate it being in place prior to the end of November prior to requesting the Final Certificate of Occupancy. In the interim, we can provide a letter from the Owner, General Contractor and Fabricator, if necessary to provide proof that the stair is in process. I have reviewed the original approval drawings for our Site Development Review to identify any other items that might be a part of your review. I do not find anything else that has not been addressed at this time. One item, not covered as art condition of completion that I want to mention in case it is a question is the security fencing along 72nd. Currently a 4'6" green steel fence extends along a portion of 72`d to discourage people from walking on to the site from the east where the steep drop off could be a problem. Our plan, as shown on the approved Construction Documents is to add fencing to protect the entire length of 72" except where the new stair extends. This fencing is due to arrive via special delivery today and be installed on Wednesday and Thursday. Again, I don't believe this was a condition of approval, but I wanted to let you know what is happening with it in case the question arose. If you have any questions, you can call me or the superintendent, Gary Lundervold (cell 939- 3758). Thank you for your assistance with this final phase of work. END COMMUNIQUE APPLICANT MATERIALS MINOR MODIFICATION TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location(s): '7/2-41 17 :!a /DATE Map &Tax Lot#(s): j� �;� %(,'. PRE-APP. HELD WITH: /1 i+ • ' ay �t'�1jty G DATE OF PRE APP.: Zemi Site Size: '_" h, 1 f}= f nj9 G 7 1filY , Property Owner/De-d Holder(s)*: r a%'t 0 Ii . •4A L 4 n Address:02 Mi■ C. Phone: '2-24- - FOR STAFF USE ONLY City: t1rd it Zip: i t-. Applicant*: I '7 ''veJ t - L Case No.(s): f -'60 Address: /0/24- ' '51 Phone: .-12/Z-- -Lj7.5 7 p �f j/ City: �`I'l �� �?� Zip: Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.:(9 D©4 -- (; * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant Application Acce ted By: ;r % '� j� ) must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written /AZ;lod authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Date: must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Date Determined Complete: PROPOSAL SUMMARY Rev.7/31/2000 i:\curpin\masters\revised\minormod.mst The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the (Note: applications will not be accepted criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed without the required submittal elements) response to each criteria. I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. d Application Form 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. d Owner's Signature/Written Authorization 5. An increase in the height of the building(s)by more than 20%. ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed 144' 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. 1. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. R/ Site Development Plan (3 copies) 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10%excluding expansions under �/ 5,000 square feet. l� Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space Applicant's Statement (3 copies) area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than ten percent. (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.360.050(8) 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan. Filing Fee (City) $100.00 II. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the (Urban) $236.00 subject of Criteria I through 10 above. In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change complies with the underlying standards of the applicable zoning district. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how the site expansion will continue to comply with the minimum setback, building height, parking land landscaping standards. Other applicable requirements such as minimum Clear Vision areas near driveways and street intersections may also be applicable depending on where the building expansion is proposed to be constructed on the site. 1 APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of F.4., ,204, ..1(e.,,,fry40,Z • ,Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 • EXIST. CCE66 fiKf1 OW 17ND AYE. PO E,rm.. VMLT P11[ •I 1 POG I. • Q - y,y T 'n NEW TOMMY' (E (El WE ENTRY,(QE-WAY) I ,r TO T �� .SEE C —_ �7 Fl�CPOl1lEl L1.0 I 1`e , RENCE-SEE G • .PAO .110Ervur I . 1Piw~�fiLLY PAO j a • �1 ,I / 1 Y ROW. EXIii / 15L-DG�/C E I 11� E cEYaTaE `rl RETAINING WALL B.RETAIL rPOPPreo)o I i■ S3•AR SP. L ` lEN 4'PINGING rUfµD SF 01-MDR SALES, �`T TO tATGN EXIST. ' I • • PIDGE-SEE A107 C.RETAIL NO OCCIII•ANCT, ■ Li I/E LIMO /ma FEMUR 11709 SF. ME / T301 SW ST. /1 Q I7 REW 1 RT' / —T • • •-. RETANEG WALLS.ii 1SS SW 0•y•ST.. SEE CINL Z i 04 / 21.ANDOAL a(El SIDEIWLK.CII® • lEW 4'RCNG CUTS TO REfLN 'f� TO 4'PEI ENG !=.Glm.o���!■ �M��'1 vrs'-• T// WISGLCarT IIR'N • R. 4 1. -_.•3.__�r17�,_%II,_I.1�:_■r 1TNCE-SEE 41NEW gi fl II New NOON STAIR CAr11SOL P / I E � ISLA1pb `III�I �' 7710.SEE A401.� 7OM PATTE / �:a1 ( ) aroma c �>4 E.� 7i,' ° _ �II I E?t'NIGH T}TrGE / I. 1.1 / _ ^ - ■E XEY9TCNE POLL 117. /. .PE EXISTING al-T.L'NaG.wLL T �Y.�'.' 41G q P' � ,EXIST.STALLS.PRY I0FrI�- 1 ;.; 47 -TAL AO. !.' / C :DSST. a f� •r�l� • _ :film 4. . __... Nol/ r _. . c_..._, --- ....i. , irg4.morrugg • ALM 1�1 ISLAR/I w - •, I aD� .in __ ILANO&FLAIR ■ °1 1 TIeS - re SW DARTIICUN S TOILTCSI DOS I. F..1 MEMP. )Er :1 ,REMOVE eV 1 AMA RETANNL wALL CE RETALL i• WA.Ou ROCKET, I •1-L' MO=S PANTI WALL-9EE 4301 4 VE—∎� �1 SA*SF. • plg 111 .i'P O ALIGN NEW ISLAIO•V- ■= AW.irAE1T "'ROW.OF EMG y.�.. P - —T___F 1 • A �Vy�J I .1 rEl SITE SK31 TO S - -pp7��1 �'r. III REFIAN Ma rte'►;,-%i� i►kilialtiV l' K • / (E)SITE ENTRY. rS SPACES) /� NEW TRMtYGR+ER 1....„..-------------- /// (TWO-WAYI w New sou,STAIR I e F SEE A4044 °L. I o= I (-- e ---% 1 1 ZONING CONFORMANCE PLAN '. TIGARD TRIANGLE, REM BOLD PROPERTIES, LLC >r 1110mMOr 20028/99015 MC Mir 20028 A201 —REV3.DWG SHEET NO: 2 0 1 tsY SEPT 25, 2000 ��et M OHIO! QI9-25-00 I BLDG B RECEIVING SHED 01/03/00 13:58 FAX I?] col ~ ' SpkgW—a�a/6 MCM /67)7 eakt 1 G . n c n i - e c + * 1022 V./SALMON ST.SUITE 350 PORTLAND,OREGON 87205 • USA•TELEPHONE 503 2225757• FAX 509 241 1514•WWW.IMCMAFiGHITECTe.CGM COMMUNIQUE DISTRIBUTION: VIA: DATE January 3,2000 File TO: Julia Hajduk City of Tigard NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: Planning Department PROJECT NUMBER: 99015 684-7297 FILE NAME Hajduk=01-03-00_bikepark.doc VIA: Fax PROJECT' Rembold Tigard Triangle FROM Doug Benson RE: Bike Parking Requirements In the bike parking requirements section of the code the criteria for the size of the bike spaces is given as 2'-6" x 6'-0". As a general rule we have used one of the standard "ribbon" style manufactured racks similar to the one shown on the attached cut sheet. However, it places the bikes much closer together than the spacing indicated in the code. Does the code requirements mean that we can't use the standard off the shelf product and instead must use a custom fabricated rack? If you can just jot your answer on this page and fax it back, I would appreciate it. Thanks. END COMMUNIQUE 4. r/ao 1 .S/- / Sly L-l 'S i-�/ls_ .47y li/-i20reM6.-i S /4A e 2 A b is MI degr9'iC.e 4 'e'./,s 4 ClOmode4/-e b�%�s /2:›1 9/174 ec re-e • • • RE' Bike Parking Requirements In the bike parking requirements section of the code the criteria for the size of the bike spaces is given as 2'-6" x 6'-0". As a general rule we have used one of the standard "ribbon" style manufactured racks similar to the one shown on the attached cut sheet. However, it places the bikes much closer together than the spacing indicated in the code. Does the code requirements mean that we can't use the standard off the shelf product and instead must use a custom fabricated rack? If you can just jot your answer on this page and fax it back,I would appreciate it. Thanks. END COMMUNIQUE (-,:44; .fir l G J 1c7 i S C. 777.k is A 6 r s /-45/41 dez,vgic, ole t,/4 ceo 0cAq b� rJce eaz egeJA 51,16-e , ?Ai /-4,z_c0 Post-It''Fax Note 7671 Date ,_2n pag s To } From l r, ()°-q IbtS"GVvIf-- Co./Dept, Co. r— di A Phone# Phona# 39�Y;7/rsY07 Fax# Fax# NO iznS1N S d9Yd 9£,00 aIQI1. JWSII ft:0T 6O/TO HIQIZ LIVIS QI NOIIOdNNOO tTSTTt7 'IH,L NOIJO.NNOO ETU, '0N X1/XI NO NOI SS I1 SNVH1 }..�.}. ,LNOd3N A.LIAI LDV .}..�.}. :'3::}::}::}:$::}::3:$$$*..1..}.4$$*$:3:$a:3::}:$$$ • TOOZI Q1V9IL AO AIIO L67,L . 09 £OS$ St:OT 00/fO/TO 02/03/00 11:01 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Q001/003 SDK X999-cool 6 Pride Disposal Co. FaDE To: c v From: 1 f Fax: -� q Date: ~'3 " C) Phone: Pages: 3 --- --- — ---..- Attu: ❑ Urgent O For Review Cl Please Comment 0 Please Reply L7 Please Recycle TELEPHONE(503)6258177 I FAX 0 (503) 625-6179 -Comments: I LA) O /Fin. 5 O''z ti 5 IA) I/1 Po p 0 ,-, past:tit 46-tilif )..n_e...14-- 1/1.e_a_ 1,0 s Gus s 02/03/00 11:01 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 11002/003 Pride Disposal Co. Fa)C T.: i v 1 1, m From: J � ✓1� I I Fa_": _..... `T ( ^ .15-P-1 Oates a -I3 - D O •~ Phone: Pages: 9 _...._ • I Re: Attla P D J 1 4fj 2Y,$O y'1 _ . ❑ Urgent O For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑please Keply 0 Please Recycle TELEPHONE(503)5 2.58177 FAX 0 (503) 6254179 • •Comments: 02103/00 11:02 /3503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Z003/003 r °1 d --1 or [1 : in, g , 5 ilii til . L 1 , __., , _ , kJ , * NI ,, ,111 ; ill.ii- leg- z < , 3ntarx OWL Ws 7, . "-=-i*1 1 ill; , : '' R-14440 . , 1 , �- :: �i4r.��r�rsr.r�1 I i rq , ; z; Ipi i II i I "I i I I .i u L -11 ; �. c_ ! 1 ' E1-1+FN I f I I I ' i �- ' - ! - i Fli LI 141IIllIl1III/i , i JIII I II m H Hi) r ( Pri-FEHIHI 1 ii HH HIE_ il liI IIl l I I is----.._ _ o txxxi \\\\\\\\„\\\\\\\\\\\ e a A. ;F7' 0 I- 1 ail April 4, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Doug Benson MCM Architects, P.C. 1022 SW Salmon St. Ste 350 Tigard, OR 97205 RE: Plans Check Number: 3-75C & 3-76C— Rembold Properties Bldg. "C" This letter is to confirm receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the building plans examiner. As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is/are: SDR1999-00016 Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s) and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans are not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit will not be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and I will be happy to explain further. —&111/1k-e- Bonnie Mulhearn Development Services Technician cc: Building file cc: Planning Department cc: Engineering Department I:\DSTS\BUPLUC.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 MCMa c r i a c r a 1022 SW SALMON ST.SUITE 350 • PORTLAND.OREGON 97205 • USA•TELEPHONE 503 222 5757 • FAX 503 241 1514 WWW.MCMARCHITECTS.COM COMMUNIQUE DISTRIBUTION: VIA: DATE: September 25,2000 Doherty delivered O'Donnell messenger TO: Julia Hajduk File 2.40 City of Tigard Planning Department NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: VIA. Hand Delivered PROJECT NUMBER: 99015 FILE NAME: Hajduk=09-25-00=Pbox_mod.doc PROJECT: Rembold-Tigard Triangle PoppyBox Gardens Minor Modification Application FROM Loy Rusch Subject: Minor Modification to Site Development Review Approval #SDR1999-00016 to permit construction of a new Receiving Shed for PoppyBox Gardens. PoppyBox Gardens wishes to construct a small, one-story receiving shed in the paved service yard at the north end of their building. The purpose of the structure is to provide a secured location in which to receive merchandise before moving the products to various locations within the store. Response to criteria in Section 18.360.050(B) of the Tigard Development Code. Criteria 1:An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. Not applicable; the project is not a residential development. Criteria 2: A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. Not applicable; the project is not a residential development. Criteria 3: A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. Not applicable; the proposed minor modification does not involve a change in parking. Criteria 4: A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. Not applicable; the proposed minor modification does not involve a change in the occupancy type for the approved buildings at Rembold—Tigard Triangle. Criteria 5: An increase in the height of the building by more than 20 percent. Not applicable; the proposed minor modification does not involve a change in the building height for the approved buildings at Rembold—Tigard Triangle. Criteria 6: A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. Not applicable; the proposed minor modification does not involve a change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. COMMUNIQUE PAGE 2 Criteria 7: An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. Not applicable; the proposed minor modification does not involve an increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site. Criteria 8: An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than ten percent, excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposed minor modification involves the construction of a ± 600 sf one-story free-standing receiving shed at the north end of the PoppyBox Gardens portion of the development. The proposal does not exceed the criteria limitations. Criteria 9: A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space by more than ten percent. There is no area reserved for common open space. The proposed Receiving Shed will be constructed in an area that was previously designated on the approved construction drawings as an asphalt paved service yard. Criteria 10:A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan. The proposed Receiving Shed will not replace any landscaping. The proposed Receiving Shed will be constructed in an area that was previously designated on the approved construction drawings as an asphalt paved service yard. Criteria 11:A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of criteria 1 through 10. The proposed minor modification does not violate the original Site Development Review Conditions of Approval for SDR1999-00016. Compliance With Other Zoning Regulations: Building Setback: The proposed receiving shed will align with the approved location for the east face of the PoppyBox Gardens building, placing its east face 28'-1" from the SW 72nd Avenue right- of-way. Building Height: The receiving shed will be ± 13'-6"high,measured to the ridge. Maximum allowable height by zoning is 45', and 24'by the CC&R's for the overall development. Exterior Materials: The receiving shed has the same exterior wall material as on the approved PoppyBox Gardens building;plywood siding with vertical battens. The roof is composition shingles. Parking: The approved parking layout is not affected by the receiving shed. The shed will only be used by the employees of PoppyBox Gardens to receive and then distribute products COMMUNIQUE PAGE 3 within the store. The overall project provides 145 parking stalls; 116 is the required minimum and 158 the maximum allowed. The projects exceeds the number of accessible stalls required and also exceeds the number of bike spaces required. Landscaping: The location of the proposed receiving shed doesn't take away any of the landscaping being provided as part of the development. The minimum required landscaping is 15% and the development has provided 23%. END COMMUNIQUE MCM A R C H I T E C T S 1022 SW SALMON ST,SUITE 350 • PORTLAND,OREGON 97205 USA•TELEPHONE 503 222 5757 • FAX 503 241 1514 WWW.MCMARCHITECTS.COM TRANSMITTAL DISTRIBUTION: VIA: File DATE: September 26,2000 NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: TO: Julia Hajduk City of Tigard PROJECT NUMBER: 99015 Planning Department FILE NAME: Haj=09-26-00=minor_mod.doc PROJECT Rembold-Tigard Triangle PoppyBox Gardens Minor Modification Application FROM: Loy Rusch VIA: hand COPIES DATED PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 sets 9-25-00 Sheet A201 Zoning Conformance Site Plan and Sheet 1/1 Receiving Shed Plans &Elevations 3 9-25-00 MCM memo re: Section 18.360.050(B) 3 9-25-00 8-1/2 x 11 Site Plan 1 9-26-00 Completed Application Form, signed by the Owner 1 9-25-00 Check#1819 from PoppyBox Gardens in the amount of $100.00. REMARKS: As required from your meeting last Wednesday with Doug Benson of MCM Architects, with respect to the Receiving Shed addition for PoppyBox Gardens.