Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1999-00017
SDR1999 - 00017 REDWOOD CENTER NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR] 1999-00017 .' I ADJUSTMENT WAR) 1999-00021 CITYTIGARD Community Date lopmen t REDWOOD CENTER Shaping ABetter Community 120 DAYS = 1/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: REDWOOD CENTER CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00017 Adjustment VAR1999-00021 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 20 feet to 5. APPLICANT: Wayne Gerig OWNER: Terrance and Mary Johnston 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle PO Box 1608 Beaverton, OR 97007 Tualatin, OR 97062 PLANNING Jim Griffith and Associates CONSULTANT Aldie Howard 1820 SW Vermont St., S-K Portland, OR 97219 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1901. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 7NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. )"1. Modify the landscape plan to show no vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle that is greater than 3 feet in height or that has limbs below 8 feet in height. "k12. Submit a revised landscape plan that provides at minimum, a 6-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot wall along the west property line. 3. Modify the landscape plan to show the 2 trees closest to the access drive will be removed. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows a van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot aisle. 1. Submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap space may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. 6. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 7. Submit a revised plan that shows 3 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 8. If, as a result of modifications made to meet other conditions, the building size is reduced below 5,228 square feet, the applicant must submit revised parking calculations to insure that the maximum parking space requirement is not exceeded. 9. Submit a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west. 10. Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. 11 . Prior to issuance of site or building permit, submit a tree mitigation plan showing how the 113 caliper inches will be mitigated (on-site, off-site or by paying a fee in-lieu). If the fee in-lieu option is chosen, this fee must be paid rior to issuance of building permits. If on or off-site mitigation is proposed, a bond for the replanting of 113 caliper inches must be provided. t 2. Submit written confirmation of the hours of operation in order for staff to confirm that the hours will not exceed 7:00AM to 10:00 PM. This written confirmation must also verify that all future tenants will be made aware of the zoning restrictions in this zone. X13. Submit a lighting plan for the Police Department review and approval. X14. Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 15. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer connection in SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 2 OF 18 16. As a part of the improvement plan submittal, the ..Igineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also, specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 17. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 18. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 19. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 20. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall grant an ingress/egress easement to the owner of Tax Lot 1900 (1 S135AA) to allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between the two properties. The general location of the easement should be to the south of the proposed building location. 21. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 22. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order Sewerage 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 24. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages. and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 3 OF 18 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $5,665 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 26. Prior to Final Inspection, trees numbered 5, 56, 63 and 64 may not be removed without prior approval from the planning staff and re-calculation of tree mitigation requirements. Staff Contact: Julia Powell Hajduk, Planning Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A search of the City records do not indicate any previous land use approvals have been granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the west-side of SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered to the north and west by property zoned C-N. The property to the south is zoned C-P and developed with an existing day care. Site Information and Proposal Description: The property is currently vacant. The property is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of an existing daycare center; WCTM 1S135AA, tax lot 1901. The applicant is proposing to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also proposing to dedicate an additional 15 feet of right-of- way which will significantly affect the size of the property. The applicant is, therefore, requesting a Variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 5 feet. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS The City mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site providing them an opportunity to comment. One letter was received against the front yard setback variance. The reason cited for being opposed to the variance was that it would prevent SW Hall Boulevard from being widened to 5 lanes. Staff response: The applicant is requesting the variance because they are being required to dedicate and additional 15 feet of right-of-way along SW Hall Boulevard. This additional right-of-way will allow for future widening of Hall Boulevard to 5 lanes. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 4 OF 18 of the development. _action 18.390.040 states that wk. .1 a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is generated is $184. The total TIF calculated for a new 5,228 square foot medical office is $32,869. The City Engineer has estimated that the cost of dedication is $3 per square foot. Based on this estimate, the cost of the required 15 foot right-of-way dedication would be approximately 9,270. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF s of approximately $32,869 based on 100% medical office use. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $102,715 ($32,869 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $32,869, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $69,846. Given these estimates, the 15 foot right- of-way dedication meet the roughly proportional standard. Improvements are also required by ODOT to provide access to the ODOT the (Hall Boulevard). In any event, the applicant has proposed and concurred with the required improvements. The street improvement and dedication requirements are discussed in this decision under Street and Utility Improvements Standards. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.7452 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Variances shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using standards of approval contained in Subsection 2 below. The Director shall approve approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The variance is to reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 5 feet. The building will have frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. The requested adjustment is justified because the applicant is being required to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way adjacent to the property to accommodate a 90-foot right-of-way. In addition, this adjustment is consistent with the proposed standards being discussed as part of the Washington Square Regional Center, therefore, the reduction on the front yard setback will not preclude adherence to other requirements of the City and will not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has. no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021-REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 5 OF 18 The special circumstances on this site is the fact that the lot is relatively small and the applicant must dedicate an additional 15 feet of right-of-way. This is unique to this lot and is out of the control of the applicant. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The use proposed would be permitted on other lots in the same zone that have fewer constraints. The development will be required to comply with all other standards of the code. In addition, the project will be more conforming with Washington Square Regional Center standards if adopted by Council. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The reduction in front yard setback will allow the applicant to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way while continuing to maintain an economic use of the property. Because the applicant will be providing for additional right-of-way, the existing physical systems will be improved. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is caused by the need to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way and continue to maintain an economic use of the property. This hardship is not self-imposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the adjustment standards are met. Landscaping and Screeninq(18.745 and 18.360): Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has 205 feet of frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. There are 2 existing trees which will be retained at the southern portion of the lot which will serve as street trees. The applicant has shown 5 additional Norway Maple trees will be planted. The 2 trees closest to the access drive will be within the vision clearance area. These trees are not necessary due to the location of the existing trees and spacing of the remaining proposed trees. The landscaping plan must be modified accordingly. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 6-10 foot buffer with lawn/groundcover shrubs and screening. The property to the west is zoned C-N, however, the existing use is single-family residential. The applicant must, therefore, provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.2. The applicant's plans show the building will be set back less than 2 feet from the western property line. The plans will need to be revised to show a minimum 6-foot buffer with landscaping and screening based on the buffer width provided. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 6 OF 18 The applicant's landscar,., plan shows that, even after the 15-,.,Jt dedication, there will be 5 feet of landscaping around the perimeter of the parking lot. The applicant has indicated that Azaleas and Rock Cottoneaster will be planted as parking lot screening. The landscape plan also shows that trees will be planted within the parking lot that will meet the requirement of 1 tree for every 7 parking spaces. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant meets the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit a revised landscape plan that provides at minimum, a 6-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot wall along the west property line. Modify the landscape plan to show the 2 trees closest to the access drive will be removed. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's plans show some vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas. A condition has been imposed earlier in this decision requiring 2 of the proposed street trees to be deleted from the landscape plan. There is additional vegetation proposed within the vision clearance area that must be modified to be located outside of the vision clearance area. Alternatively, the applicant may provide documentation that indicates the vegetation proposed will not grow higher than 3 feet in height. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been fully met, however, compliance with the condition listed below will insure that this standard is met. CONDITION: Modify the landscape plan to show no vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle that is greater than 3 feet in height or that has no limbs below 8 feet in height. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 21 parking spaces, therefore, 1 ADA parking space is required. Because at least 1 space must be van accessible, the proposed space must be van accessible with a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle. The applicants plans show a handicap access aisle that is 8 feet wide, but there is no adjacent parking lot that is 9 feet wide and neither space on either side of the access aisle are designated as handicap. A condition is warranted to meet this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 7 OF 18 Access drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street p arking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is actually regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and will be discussed further in this decision. Vision clearance has been previously addressed. Pedestrian access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There is a walkway from the street to the building which does not require crossing a parking lot, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking lot striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show 21 parking spaces clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans indicate wheel stops will be installed for all proposed parking spaces. Space and aisle dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans do not clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. Staff attempted to scale the parking spaces and it appears that there are 7 compact spaces, 14 standard spaces. However, this is a copy and staff can not confirm that each space meets the required dimensions. Because staff is not comfortable that each space was scaled accurately, a condition of approval will be imposed requiring the applicant to submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap space may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 8 OF 18 • Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance to the building and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle parking design requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well-drained. The applicant has not provided detail of the bicycle parking rack, therefore, staff can not determine of this standard has been met. If the applicant submits a detail of the bicycle rack, staff will be able to review it to insure that the design complies with the standards of standards code. The space dedicated to bicycle parking is 4 feet by 6 feet. Minimum bicycle parking requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for office uses, .5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the building is 5,228 square feet, 2.6 bicycle parking spaces are required. When rounded up as required, 3 spaces must be provided. The applicant has indicated that 2 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. The applicant must revise the plan to provide 3 bicycle parking spaces. Minimum off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for an office use is 2.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet and because the site is in parking zone B, the maximum parking is 4.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposed building size is 5,228 square feet, therefore, the minimum parking is 14 spaces and the maximum is a total of 21 parking spaces. The applicant has shown 21 spaces will be provided. If the building size is adjusted, however, the parking may need to be reduced accordingly. Because staff is not certain if the buffering and screening requirement discussed previously will result in a reduction in building size, a condition will be imposed that states the parking must be re-calculated if the building size is reduced. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 9 OF 18 CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows a van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle. • Submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap spaces may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. • Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. • Submit a revised plan that shows 3 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. • If, as a result of modifications made to meet other conditions, the building size is reduced below 5,228 square feet, the applicant must submit revised parking calculations to insure that the maximum parking space requirement is not exceeded. Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site edestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's plans show a walkway will be provided from the ground floor entrance to the public street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkway provided to the building entrance does not cross an accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete and tie into the existing concrete sidewalk. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 10 OF 18 The applicant has subrn.__.:d a plan that shows a 30-foot-wide -_.;ess will be provided with 30 feet of pavement, thus satisfying the criteria. Director's Authority to restrict access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The applicant has not provided a connection to adjacent properties. The property to the south has recently been developed with a daycare and a shared access easement was not required as part of that development, therefore, shared access with that property is not possible. Due to the location of the proposed building, shared access to the property to the north is not possible. The property to the west is undeveloped and zoned C-N and a future connection is possible. The applicant must slightly revise the plan to provide for a future connection to the property to the west. This is also discussed and justified in more detail further in this decision under public facility concerns. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are not satisfied, however, if the applicant submits a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west. Tree Removal: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification o a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an arborist report that identifies all the trees over 6 caliper inches. There are 30 trees on the site over 12 inches caliper. Of those 30, 20 are considered hazardous and do not require mitigation. Therefore, there are 10 trees that are mitigatable. The applicant has proposed to retain 4 of these trees. If the applicant can save the remaining 6 trees, the mitigation amount will be 113 inches. If, in the course of construction, it is determined that additional trees must be removed because they can not be saved, the mitigation amount will change, as may the street tree planting requirement. The applicant has not indicated how the required inches will be mitigated. The arborist has identified tree preservation methods to insure that the trees to remain will not be harmed during construction. A condition of approval will be imposed requiring the tree protection measures to be in place prior to any site work and maintained throughout the construction. FINDING: Because no mitigable trees over 12 inches will be removed, the Tree Removal standards have been satisfied, however, a condition will be attached insuring that the trees to remain are not harmed during construction. CONDITIONS: • Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. Prior to issuance of site or building permit, submit a tree mitigation plan showing how the 113 caliper inches will be mitigated (on-site, off-site or by paying a fee in-lieu). If the fee in-lieu option is chosen, this fee must be paid prior to issuance of building permits. If on or off-site mitigation is proposed, a bond for the replanting of 113 caliper inches must be provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 11 OF 18 Prior to Final Inspection, trees numbered 5, 56, 63 and 64 may not be removed without prior approval from the planning staff and re-calculation of mitigation requirements. Signs: Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C- G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is under the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) jurisdiction. ODOT staff submitted comments, dated October 7, 1999, to the City with regard to this application. Their comments are considered part of this decision. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way width of 90 feet. At present, there is only 30 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide 45 feet from centerline to meet City standards. This dedication should be conveyed to ODOT using their forms. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as described. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to this site. The plans indicate the applicant will install a new commercial driveway to serve the development. ODOT's comments indicate that a permit will be required for that work. Driveway Concern ODOT is concerned with the proposed access location and the lack of depth of the proposed driveway throat. When SW Hall Boulevard widened in the future, as anticipated by the Transportation Plan, the depth of the driveway throat will be even shorter. The concern is that onsite traffic flow will potentially back up into the public roadway potentially causing rear-end collisions. ODOT suggests the applicant reconfigure the location or shape of the building to minimize these conflicts. Neither ODOT or the City have a development code standard for the depth of a driveway throat. Because of this, Staff does not believe the City could require the applicant to reconfigure or relocate the building. 18.705.030.G.3 states that in no case shall the design of a service driveway require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street. Staff believes the driveway and parking configuration is such that cars should not need to back into Hall Boulevard to exit the site. Therefore, Staff supports the applicant's plan. However, Staff encourages the applicant to explore other options that would enable the driveway throat to increase in size. There is another partial solution that Staff believes would improve the situation. Staff recommends the applicant be required to grant a crossover access easement to the parcel immediately west of this site (1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 1900) and configure their parking area to allow for a future drive aisle connection to the adjacent parcel. In the future, when Tax Lot 1900 is developed, the City can require a crossover easement on that parcel and make sure a physical drive aisle is constructed between the two sites. At that time, all access from both parcels cot* be directed to SW 87 Avenue, or be split between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87 Avenue. If ODOT finds that the SW Hall Boulevard driveway is problematic in the future, they could require it to be closed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021-REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 12 OF 18 Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The applicant's plans indicate that they will need to obtain service from the main line in SW Hall Boulevard. A permit from TVWD must be obtained prior to construction. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Hall Boulevard that can serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates they will connect to this line and extend a service lateral to the site. The ODOT permit will need to cover the street cut and patch work, and a separate permit from the City will be necessary to cover the connection to the sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the east. The applicant is proposing to route the onsite runoff to the southeast corner of the site where it will be treated and detained in a vegetated pond. From there, the water will be conveyed to the existing storm drainage system in SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT's comments indicate the applicant will need to obtain approval from them for the design of the detention pond. The ODOT approval must be obtained prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide a treatment pond at the southeast corner of the site. The preliminary sizing calculations indicate the pond will need a volume of approximately 208 cubic feet. However, the engineer indicates they will likely design the pond to have a volume of approximately 500 cubic feet. It appears there is ample room on the site for this pond. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 206 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $5,665. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 13 OF 18 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assignin addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary SB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee s all be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan and proposal, does not meet the Street and Utility Improvement Standards, however, if the applicant complies with conditions 15 through 25 specified at the beginning of this decision, the standards will be met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has proposed a 9-foot x 10-foot screened enclosure. The applicant indicates that the franchise hauler method would be used and indicated that they had received approval for the location proposed. The applicant stated that an approval letter had been obtained and that a copy was included in the submittal package, however, staff could not locate a letter from Pride Disposal. A condition of approval is warranted for the applicant to submit a copy of the approval letter from Pride Disposal for the location of the trash enclosure. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, Staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the location and size of the facility is adequate, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use), 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 14 OF 18 Relationship to the Na_ .al and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building has been located on the site with consideration of the existing trees, access and surrounding lots. The site is flat and not subject to slumping. The location of the building will continue to maintain adequate distance between neighboring buildings. Staff has determined that this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and asked that a lighting plan be provided for review and approval FINDING: Because the Police Department has determined that a lighting plan is needed, the Crime Prevention and Safety Standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for the Police Department review and approval. Public transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The project has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard which is on a Tri-met transit route. Staff did not receive any comments or objections from Tri-met regarding the need for a transit facility in this location, therefore, staff has determined that this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Because no comments were received from Tri-met regarding the need for additional transit facilities at this location, staff has determined that this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the underlying zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g. Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for office use NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 15 OF 18 The proposed office use is listed as a permitted use within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. The C-N zone has the following special limitations set forth in 18.520.050.A: (1)The use shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except as allowed in Section 3 below; (2) No use shall have a gross floor area greater than 4,000 square feet; (3) Accessory open-air sales, display and/or storage shall be permitted for horticultural and food merchandise only and shall constitute no more than 5% of the gross building floor area of any individual establishment; and (4) Uses operating before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM shall be subject to the conditional use provisions, as governed in Chapter 18.330. The use proposed will be contained wholly within the building. All future tenants must adhere to this standard as well. The proposed building is over 4,000 square feet, however, based on the floor plan provided, the optical clinic will be 2,776 square feet. Additional tenants will not exceed the requirement as long as the use is not a medical office. No open sales area is proposed. The applicant has not indicated the hours of business. A condition of approval is necessary requiring the applicant to submit written confirmation of the hours of operation in order for staff to confirm that the hours will not exceed 7:00AM to 10:00 PM. This written confirmation must also verify that all future tenants will be made aware of the zoning restrictions in this zone. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table, the proposal fully complies with the exception of the front yard setback which the applicant has requested a variance to reduce it to the proposed 5 feet, after dedication. STANDARD C-N Proposed Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq. ft 16,965 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 206 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 20 ft. 5 ft [4] - Side facing street on corner&through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft. [3] 3 ft - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [3] 1.6 ft Maximum height 35 ft. 17 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 79% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 21% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Setback after dedication. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: (1) East and north walls shall be of 1-hour fire resistive construction without openings and with parapet, (2) the windows within 10 feet of the property line on the angle wall to the southeast property line shall be protected. The wall within 20 feet shall be protected to 1-hour with parapet. No windows are permitted within 5 feet of property line, (3) All restrooms shall be accessible and door to shower 36" wide, (4) Submit fire flow worksheet to determine the number and placement of new fire hydrants, (5) Submit a fire hydrant flow test of new or existing fire hydrant within 250 feet of all exterior walls. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: Please contact TVWD for comments, all sanitary and storm to be "private". Ensure connection to sanitary manhole includes channel to direct solids into City sanitary sewer line. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the application and indicated that they would like to see a lighting plan for review and approval. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has not provided comments or objections. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: The proposed development is located on SW Hall Boulevard (OR 141). According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), this state facility is classified as a District highway. We have an interesT in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient functioning of this state facility. We request that the City include the following ODOT requirements in the conditions of approval: ODOT permits are required for access to the state highway, for all work in the State right-of- way, and for connection to the State's drainage system Contact Ed Miller, Permit Specialist, ODOT District 2A at 229-5002 for information on the written permit process. The driveway must be designed to minimize possible blocking of the driveway flow, to minimize internal site circulation conflicts and to minimize adverse effects on the flow of traffic on the highway. The lack of depth of the driveway's throat could cause vehicles exiting or entrancing the driveway to conflict with vehicles pulling in and out of the eight parking spaces along the building's front entrance. Vehicles exiting the driveway may cause vehicles entering the driveway to back-up onto Hall Boulevard and potentially cause rear-end accidents. These potential vehicular conflicts are even more likely when Hall Boulevard is widened and the 15-foot right-of-way section is paved over for an additional lane and new sidewalk. The site plan should be revise to address these concerns. Possible solutions to address these concerns are reconfiguration of the building's shape or relocation of the building. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage shall be built according to ODOT and ADA standards. If the property drains naturally to the State's system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition for the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. ODOT supports the City's requirement to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way on Hall Boulevard to meet the City's right-of-way width of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline) for an arterial, which is Hall Boulevard's street classification. Staff response: The ODOT comments have been reviewed and discussed in detail under the public facility concerns section of this decision. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated into the body of this decision. TCI, PGE, US West, GTE, Tri-Met, NW Natural Gas, and Tualatin Valley Water District have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 7NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 17 OF 18 SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners • X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Areal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 1999. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. L'ed 194_ November 10, 1999 PREPARED Y: Julia Poweff Hajduk DATE Associate Planner 0../c-� November 10, 1999 PREPARED BY: Richard H. wersdorff DATE Planning M nager i:\curpin\julia\sdnRedwood center2.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 18 OF 18 1 . . •,v;::. , \I I II 1 ,r",i ..fti.-• !-___..._ ..4._...:.. . ji ,,0;....- I r I 4 A. 1 t__, ■ ‘,.• j."•_•3 . . ■ il 1")•1"\--' al■ ' I. • •7 IV •IP:i .. _ .....,if NEW BUILDING 4 . • , i • • • . . - . .. .. i . . • z,... . .. • - • \ I . U) .. _ J // ' • 1 I . i . Ii . • 1 : li > e iI a :.. Ii 7 ..%l. 4 ,. _-s„..-„, '- .t" t•- c9 , . -, (.9 • il 0 :CS t f 0 c 1. ct > Z . , . L . • f; p !.,- • i = Z • '`.--- o co < ,, 0.• ! —I ..-I ..7. //` • 1 4.-.-. z I . " .V .\ (S • /N\, ,,,, . . I <X .. = a .: - ‘ -- --------4, =II -. z . z . I . . • I- . .5. -- 11 • c..-.) . , . • ,.. . . I I I- • . . . .. ,.. .,1 _,.._ ___ 1(„:„._ .„. 0 & 1 _ ------ \--r-' - - - - '';..;a-:1•Aln 44 i -) .- I i __13.41AtierV.A (N'ioll-)-1:-A(1•46 _QJ 01 . - I " ■ ...N. 1 4 • T • ...,....„ : . .,,,,f,_, .0011 .9;g is34. L m h?i .• 11-- ,..._ i is si, j I 91A ' • --- ---.1 1 1.)1\1/ ;;.?,/a . SITE PLAN t SDR I 999-00017 V EXHIBIT MAP N ARI999-0002 1 (map is not to scale) REDWOOD CENTER N.....„ CITY of • RD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM HEMLOCK VICINITY MAP ST rn N'-�' I SDR1999-00017 CO • LARCH VAR 1999-00021 ST 1 / 1 ! — REDWOOD H 7 i 115 III /.11, t J CENTER l ST I— I i E — O ` OCUST w SUBJECT f �wL SITE r . APLELEAF ST r imili Q _ w --� mrn MAPLELEAF ST 1- �', co i Lo , ST ST A Z./ _____. . ( 100 207 700 {T�5;0 Fast Ir_ '. rte- - 1'•379 feel PINE ST 1 PINE ST cwt City of Tigard F. I Information on this map is for general location only and , ,c should be verified with the Development Servius Divisioff. ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 __SPRUCE SJ SRRUCE ST (S03)6394171 IIIII , httpjf m ci.tigard.or.us I ` — Plo teE Sep 21, 1999; Cs�magidMAGIC03.APR Community Development REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ill t suqq -17 September 24, 1999 RECEIVED PLANNING Gene & Vivian Davis SEP 2 7 1999 10875 SW 89th Street CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 USA 503 246-5862 Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner Planning Division City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard OR 97223 Dear Julia, The subject site is located on the west side of SW hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S 13 5AA TL 1901. As referred to file name Redwood Center. They are asking for variance to the front yard, for only a setback of 15 feet. We request that this not happen because Hall Blvd. faces that front yard and we need at least a five lane highway. Every afternoon from 3-6pm we cannot get from Spruce Street onto Hall as traffic is backed up from 99W all the way to Locust. So we are requesting that they not be granted this variance. In the future the taxpayers will have to pay to get that five feet back, in order for the Highway to be completed. Thank you, Gene & Vivian Davis y- _ „. Y egon Department of Transportation K Region 1 123 NW Flanders John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 FAX (503) 731-8259 October 7, 1999 FILE CODE: PLA9-1/2A-TIG-141 Redwood Center.doc Julia Powell Hajduk City of Tigard, Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Redwood Center, Hall Blvd. x Locust St. (SDR '/7-) Dear Ms. Hajduk: The proposed development is located on Hall Boulevard (OR 141). According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), this state facility is classified as a District highway. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient functioning of this state facility. We request that the City include the following ODOT requirements in the conditions of approval. 1. ODOT permits are required for access to the state highway, for all work in the State right-of-way, and for connection to the State's drainage system. Contact Ed Miller, Permit Specialist, ODOT District 2A at 229-5002 for information on the written permit process. 2. The driveway must be designed to minimize possible blocking of the driveway flow, to minimize internal site circulation conflicts and to minimize adverse effects on the flow of traffic on the highway. The lack of depth of the driveway's throat could cause vehicles exiting or entrancing the driveway to conflict with vehicles pulling in and out of the eight parking spaces along the building's front entrance. Vehicles exiting the driveway may cause vehicles entering the driveway to back-up onto Hall Boulevard and potentially cause rear-end accidents. These potential vehicular conflicts are even more likely when Hall Blvd. is widened and the 15' right-of-way section is paved over for an additional lane and new sidewalk. The site plan should be revised to address these concerns. Possible solutions to address these concerns are reconfiguration of the building 's shape or relocation of the building. 3. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage shall built according to ODOT and ADA standards. 4. If the property drains naturally to the State's system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition for the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. #. Form 734-1850(1/98) 2 ODOT LETTER on Redwood Center ODOT supports the City's requirement to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way on Hall Boulevard to meet the City's right-of-way width of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline) for an arterial, which is Hall's Boulevard's street classification. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 731-4610. Please send us a copy of the Notice of Decision with the conditions of approval when it has been rendered. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on this land use proposal. Sincerely yours, )arn e cc_ 14( Pamela Alegria Development Review Planner cc: Simon Eng, ODOT Traffic Analyst Ed Miller, ODOT Permit Specialist, District 2A 10/25/99 17:16 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD Ejo01 **************y:************ *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** :1-1"1'****:1:*:I..1-1-1-1-1.4-1,4-1..I.4..f..1.4-1-I.1. TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 0245 CONNECTION TEL 503 624 2020 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/25 17:15 USAGE TIME 01'49 PAGES 2 RESULT OK AN/0j I t`l!IV(' I SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCY AS-411afr =mall _ Facsimile T0: w4 rIc G er).• Company: Phone: 579_0 20 . Fax: b a Y_ Zo z — From: „jvlr, al�l Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: gyp- /5-._ Pages including this page: 3 COMMENTS: /41! A7-.4e 0_7_ rrlire 2 - 1I � � -or. • /) re.U/ Gj1 •• / -"cyee T `� ° � l / �'/ de �r#.•t94 T z/ ��rWAG - MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: November 9, 1999 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer / RE: SDR 1999-00017, Redwood Center Description: This application is for the construction of a 5,228 square foot office building on a site west of and adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, north of SW Oak Street and south of SW Locust Street (WCTM 1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 1901). Findings: 1. Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is under ODOT jurisdiction. ODOT staff submitted comments, dated October 7, 1999, to the City with regard to this application. Their comments are considered part of this report. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of 90 feet. At present, there is only 30 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide 45 feet from centerline to meet City standards. This dedication should be conveyed to ODOT using their forms. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as described. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to this site. The plans indicate the applicant will install a new commercial ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 1 driveway to serve the development. ODOT's comments indicate that a permit will be required for that work. Driveway Concern ODOT is concerned with the proposed access location and the lack of depth of the proposed driveway throat. When SW Hall Boulevard widened in the future, as anticipated by the Transportation Plan, the depth of the driveway throat will be even shorter. The concern is that onsite traffic flow will potentially back up into the public roadway potentially causing rear- end collisions. ODOT suggests the applicant reconfigure the location or shape of the building to minimize these conflicts. Neither ODOT or the City have a development code standard for the depth of a driveway throat. Because of this, Staff does not believe the City could require the applicant to reconfigure or relocate the building. 18.705.030.G.3 states that in no case shall the design of a service driveway require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street. Staff believes the driveway and parking configuration is such that cars should not need to back into Hall Boulevard to exit the site. Therefore, Staff supports the applicant's plan. However, Staff encourages the applicant to explore other options that would enable the driveway throat to increase in size. There is another partial solution that Staff believes would improve the situation. Staff recommends the applicant be required to grant a crossover access easement to the parcel immediately west of this site (1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 1900) and configure their parking area to allow for a future drive aisle connection to the adjacent parcel. In the future, when Tax Lot 1900 is developed, the City can require a crossover easement on that parcel and make sure a physical drive aisle is constructed between the two sites. At that time, all access from both parcels could be directed to SW 87th Avenue, or be split between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87th Avenue. If ODOT finds that the SW Hall Boulevard driveway is problematic in the future, they could require it to be closed. 2. Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The applicant's plans indicate that they will need to obtain service from the main line in SW Hall Boulevard. A permit from TVWD must be obtained prior to construction. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Hall Boulevard that can serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates they will connect to this line and extend a service lateral to the site. The ODOT ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 2 permit will need to cover the street cut and patch work, and a separate permit from the City will be necessary to cover the connection to the sewer line. 4. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the east. The applicant is proposing to route the onsite runoff to the southeast corner of the site where it will be treated and detained in a vegetated pond. From there, the water will be conveyed to the existing storm drainage system in SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT's comments indicate the applicant will need to obtain approval from them for the design of the detention pond. The ODOT approval must be obtained prior to construction. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide a treatment pond at the southeast corner of the site. The preliminary sizing calculations indicate the pond will need a volume of approximately 208 cubic feet. However, the engineer indicates they will likely design the pond to have a volume of approximately 500 cubic feet. It appears there is ample room on the site for this pond. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 3 with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 206 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 5,665.00. 8. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1 . Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer connection in SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 4 plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. 4. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 5. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 6. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall grant an ingress/egress easement to the owner of Tax Lot 1900 (1S1 35AA) to allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between the two properties. The general location of the easement should be to the south of the proposed building location. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 8. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 5 approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 10. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 11 . The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 5,665.00 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. \\ti 8333\usr\depts\eng\brig n r\co m men ts\sdr\sd r 1999-00017.bd r.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00017 Redwood Center PAGE 6 ' 09/28/99 TUE 10:08 FAX 503 591 0986 MD ENGINEERING 0004 iolt REQUEST FOR COMMENTS � ' CITY of TIGARD ,_OFIVED PLANNING Ti Community'DcveCopment Shaping)1 Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 SF' - ' e•' T0: Tualatin Valle Water District Admini : likes CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Ha-d k,Associate Planner Phone: M0316394171/F • 031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SOR)199'40017 arnd,VARIA CE[VAR)1999-00021 ➢ REDWOOD CENTER < REQUEST:Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and i associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 120 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; j WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity May and Applicant's Statement for our review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other informati• av .. e to 'ur staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pr•.os, in the near f.ture. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: 0 OBER 6 1999. Y. may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. It i u are unable to r,'and b the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and con urn your coy ents in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Divisio , W Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the foffaiving information)Name of Person(s)Commenting/ 1 ,Vaifr t, Phone Number[sl: SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLANNSII%ssingA Better Community -BATE: September 22,1999 SEP 2 9 1999 TO: Diana Carpenter,Tel Cable CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111 I Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00017 and VARIANCE(VARI 1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER < REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: l We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. / Written comments provided below: 1 • 1 •er�d� l ti a vv‘a m O U r -4 c I 1 ∎'t i cS I kn I e Q req A. (1r'lease provide the folrowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: n ; I, I-42.b-e42 I Phone Number[sl: y q ' SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Ul.-4 JO I I ' ' ' Us) '-Jy 5 .._•_.... I — — — — 1 .750P3 I 23 23.9 44 25 33.6 20 6 8 N MEW 1111 300' STORAGE . . A 58.5V le FIBER CABLE 15.5 295N6A1-0001 © 18.0 10025 S.W. 85TH AVE. • 10125 20 12.8 ASHCREEK APTS. �8 A r \ .�• 18 11 2 RETURN 5941 40 56' FED FROM • 18.2 44 25 33.8 .50OP3 6 8 __ - NODE 17 4 7 49.6V ® ' I • 190' 276' .625P3 .625P3 29 44dB mbilill _ 0 5d 246' R25 �■ 1097' S.W. LOCUST ST. L40, 0O .625P3 55L6A0-28-0002 ", h) rn 17E 1 • 10305 ,. 14 171-74E01 7_40 15 RETUf 5938 23.3 44 25 3 6 2 I 14.3 58.6V 556' 448' 15.8 14N L___ .500P3 14.4 4. } 3. I� 180' iii 0o ::: , .500P3 �8 ID Q 10305 A 1 8 0 N 5938 > 10265 L—' m J. co m S.W. 85TH AVE. 110' vi J i N I Q 4 = ui 15937 I 5937 .� S.W. M APL ELEAF ST. • I _ 1 A GABLE ENG NERING DEPT. S 3500 S.W. BOND PORTLAND. ORE. 97201 V. 0 1 104050 •:• FED FROM )6' 1 8.3 5936 NODE 16 1 I 16.9 13.3 I 25 ©vER�E 140 Cf2V3 LE ii 20 � ® , n,T U}J DE R G-R©(IN D CAaL( • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community Development RECE1051PEPWiter Community DATE: September 22,1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer SEP 2 9 1999 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171 I Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]1999-00011 and VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 118.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact ___ of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 �. (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: 311:\ 'Phone Number[sl: is II° 1 SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING community(Devecopment Shaping Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 S E P 2 9 1999 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department CITY OF DGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00011 and VARIANCE WAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, L18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4 � (PThase provide the foffowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED rMiNiNgvDevelopment Shaping A Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 OCT 0 41999 TO: Lori Dorsey,US West Communications CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 1999-00011 and VARIANCE MAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting I Phone Numberfsl: - c*, SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FO MMENTS CITY O TIGARD Becciriviiii: tt7'eitmiuuuity DATE: September 22,1999 SEP 2 3 1999 I OCT 0 4 1999 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program By CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: lolraPowell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRJ 1999-00011 and VARIANCE[VAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. ;-< Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: '► (P&ase provide titefolfowun information)Name of Person[s)Commenting �� I Phone Number's): ett — -, SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Urn 4.1 .66-. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 1999 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA v� . SUBJECT: Redwood Center, SDR 1999-00017, VAR 1999-00021 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume dunng a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Community Deve fop ment Sfaping A Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4M/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRJ 1999-00011 and VARIANCE[VAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1 1 f LS- CD NTA-GT ta.A ue r►�1 V A c-L- 4 ,M McvJTs ..cam Wn4,-trig . • ,n ate' /14:14.4 • .BYE !2C 4 ��S cL %/ / , • �_%& 4 (Please provide the fodowing information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: 11 11 vc Miu-& i._- I Phone Number[sl: u 3 qs I SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development DATE: September 22,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING ShapingA Better Community TO: Elaine Self,GTE OCT 0 4 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT(Julia PON=Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 1999-00011 and VARIANCE[VAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5.228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: , j iLe 1 44 (Please provide the foffawing information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: • 1 Phone Number[sl: &39_ 73 '� 7 I SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD RECEIVED PLtSR1 `unity(Development tapingA Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 SEP 2 9 1999 TO: Gary lampella,Building Official CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00017 and VARIANCE[VAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. / Written comments provided below: !/ ) ( j /, ur )- W411i 11 1.e_ 1- 4)1 f-Ifi u(?//t/1.1✓( /c•y. ( �r...L ( l w;tl dH � ,.■••• , , .-r ! .1 �1. -'""- r-4 - CY) tAie 4.1rliuvf tv,-t4 t Jo' Pi- A. OL. dZit-e An. It t-o +i.♦ So/f.cf (` t44,11 be .1•'t h/ f4€ wAt t c...'f7..A 3-0' "keel/ 3 c pe.v t ec14.vJ f v t- It K w ►T1. 0 a r ��..f / e?-4 r.e n.. , - C) 4 tf rr7uM/ elf F1// be /r/iris Le_ �'!1 170.)- 1-0 IAvw.tr ?L L,, Cy ) j.� I. 1•,j- F,re F-1 ,‘„ 6.iDrtr 14re1 ?'v off /...0 t• re e /lS...wti3V. Clc) j..L. at F 1+_ F L -, 1-4 l — rte v .,al -F 'I` a..Tt.IA 3.no or wit ee p• . % b 4/// V '► (release provide the following information)Name of Persons]Commenting: --,/-1 r Phone Number[s): y v ►� SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING REQUEST FOR COMMENT I � CITY OF TIGARD EP 2 7 199 , g ommunity(Development CITY OF T IGA ingA Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)1999-00017 and VARIANCE[VARI 1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER < REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from ' 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; 'WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4 (4'lease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: v, � I Phone Number(s): 440' I SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: September 22,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-0001/and VARIANCE WAR)1999-00021 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, [18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 6, 1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the foil-owing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number[s): SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 0CITArea: (C) IEl IS] LWl CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS W Place lorrevIewfnphraryCRBooklel FILE NOM.: FILE NAME[S): 1-ego d C4"? 7 (Neli,,e 41(4 - CITY OFFICES _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,S pe so COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./o.+pn,ni kkPOLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Cve Prevenoun Oncer BUILDING DIV./David Scott,a,w,r,g onK,a ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Wpmnt Revew Engine, -WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,uIYihes Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,GiyRecorder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE a TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* '\UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS _CITY OF BEAVERTON * _CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Neignbma Coord PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO GROWTH MANAGEMENT * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE CITY OF DURHAM * Manager,Community Development 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Portland,OR 97232-2736 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200 PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY * Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration Brent Curtis(CPAs) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT,REGION 1 * _Scott King(CPAs) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,ovipmt Rev Coord Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Jim Tice(GA's) David Knowles,Planning Bureau De. Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Tom Harry(Current PI Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Phil Healy(Current PI Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Sr.Cartographer(cerzce)Ms t. Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permrt Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 Right-of-Way Section(Vacat■ons) Rick Reeves 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe FOR Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS '"I`CI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANYNERAL TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS \Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO30546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 \TCI CABLE(Apps EelHaiuNof99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * -IND/CATTS AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IF WITHIN 500' OF Mt SNBJLCT FRORCRM FOR ANr/ALL can'PAOIECfi. frAOJLCT PLAMNLa 15 RLSPONSUILL FOR INDICATIMC FARTIL!TO NOT1FTJ h\pact dmaster strtcnotice.mst 1-Sep-99 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING '' CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping//Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appmpiate Bex(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR:I (Type:Kind of Na ce, (File No/Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-00017/VAR1999-00021-REDWOOD CENTER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: v� ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission • ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",on the 10th day of November ,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 10th day of November , 1999, postage prepaid. Ackt ( erson that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the `/ day of__Z—knrct�v-1 OFFICIAL SEAL OTA Y PUBLIC OF OREGON �~ INERMAN S C.AASPER :,A rroT ►PUBuC My Commission Expires: /3 Zno3 omwasseiwrimissION NO.323409 mAY 13,2009 EXHX NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDRI 1999-00017 ADJUSTMENT IVARI 1999-00021 CITY O T GARD Community Development REDWOOD CENTER Al Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 1/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: REDWOOD CENTER CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00017 Adjustment VAR1999-00021 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 20 feet to 5. APPLICANT: Wayne Gerig OWNER: Terrance and Mary Johnston 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle PO Box 1608 Beaverton, OR 97007 Tualatin, OR 97062 PLANNING Jim Griffith and Associates CONSULTANT Aldie Howard 1820 SW Vermont St., S-K Portland, OR 97219 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 1901 . APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 1 OF 18 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 1. Modify the landscape plan to show no vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle that is greater than 3 feet in height or that has limbs below 8 feet in height. 2. Submit a revised landscape plan that provides at minimum, a 6-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot wall along the west property line. 3. Modify the landscape plan to show the 2 trees closest to the access drive will be removed. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows a van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot aisle. 5. Submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap space may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. 6. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 7. Submit a revised plan that shows 3 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 8. If, as a result of modifications made to meet other conditions, the building size is reduced below 5,228 square feet, the applicant must submit revised parking calculations to insure that the maximum parking space requirement is not exceeded. 9. Submit a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west. 10. Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. 11 . Prior to issuance of site or building permit, submit a tree mitigation plan showing how the 113 caliper inches will be mitigated (on-site, off-site or by paying a fee in-lieu). If the fee in-lieu option is chosen, this fee must be paid rior to issuance of building permits. If on or off-site mitigation is proposed, a bond for the replanting of 113 caliper inches must be provided. 12. Submit written confirmation of the hours of operation in order for staff to confirm that the hours will not exceed 7:00AM to 10:00 PM. This written confirmation must also verify that all future tenants will be made aware of the zoning restrictions in this zone. 13. Submit a lighting plan for the Police Department review and approval. 14. Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 15. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer connection in SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 2 OF 18 16. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also, specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 17. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30. 18. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 19. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 20. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall grant an ingress/egress easement to the owner of Tax Lot 1900 (1 S135AA) to allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between the two properties. The general location of the easement should be to the south of the proposed building location. 21 . The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 22. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 24. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 3 OF 18 • 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $5,665 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 26. Prior to Final Inspection, trees numbered 5, 56, 63 and 64 may not be removed without prior approval from the planning staff and re-calculation of tree mitigation requirements. Staff Contact: Julia Powell Hajduk, Planning Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: A search of the City records do not indicate any previous land use approvals have been granted for this property. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the west-side of SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered to the north and west by property zoned C-N. The property to the south is zoned C-P and developed with an existing day care. Site Information and Proposal Description: The property is currently vacant. The property is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard, north of an existing daycare center; WCTM 1S135AA, tax lot 1901 . The applicant is proposing to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also proposing to dedicate an additional 15 feet of right-of- way which will significantly affect the size of the property. The applicant is, therefore, requesting a Variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 5 feet. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS The City mailed notice to property owners within 500 feet of the subject site providing them an opportunity to comment. One letter was received against the front yard setback variance. The reason cited for being opposed to the variance was that it would prevent SW Hall Boulevard from being widened to 5 lanes. Staff response: The applicant is requesting the variance because they are being required to dedicate and additional 15 feet of right-of-way along SW Hall Boulevard. This additional right-of-way will allow for future widening of Hall Boulevard to 5 lanes. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Impact Study: Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 4 OF 18 of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for each trip that is enerated is $184. The total TIF calculated for a new 5,228 square foot medical office is $32, 869. The City Engineer has estimated that the cost of dedication is $3 per square foot. Based on this estimate, the cost of the required 15 foot right-of-way dedication would be approximately 9,270. Upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay TIF s of approximately $32,869 based on 100% medical office use. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $102,715 ($32,869 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid and the full impact, is considered an unmitigated impact. Since the TIF paid is $32,869, the unmitigated impact can be valued at $69,846. Given these estimates, the 15 foot right- of-way dedication meet the roughly proportional standard. Improvements are also required by ODOT to provide access to the ODOT facility (Hall Boulevard). In any event, the applicant has proposed and concurred with the required improvements. The street improvement and dedication requirements are discussed in this decision under Street and Utility Improvements Standards. GENERAL APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Variances and Adjustments (18.370) Variances shall be processed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using standards of approval contained in Subsection 2 below. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a variance based on finding that the following criteria are satisfied: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; The variance is to reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 5 feet. The building will have frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. The requested adjustment is justified because the applicant is being required to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way adjacent to the property to accommodate a 90-foot right-of-way. In addition, this adjustment is consistent with the proposed standards being discussed as part of the Washington Square Regional Center, therefore, the reduction on the front yard setback will not preclude adherence to other requirements of the City and will not adversely impact other properties in the vicinity. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 5 OF 18 • The special circumstances on this site is the fact that the lot is relatively small and the applicant must dedicate an additional 15 feet of right-of-way. This is unique to this lot and is out of the control of the applicant. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting reasonable economic use of the land; The use proposed would be permitted on other lots in the same zone that have fewer constraints. The development will be required to comply with all other standards of the code. In addition, the project will be more conforming with Washington Square Regional Center standards if adopted by Council. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were developed as specified in the title; and The reduction in front yard setback will allow the applicant to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way while continuing to maintain an economic use of the property. Because the applicant will be providing for additional right-of-way, the existing physical systems will be improved. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is caused by the need to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way and continue to maintain an economic use of the property. This hardship is not self-imposed. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the adjustment standards are met. Landscaping and Screening(18.745 and 18.360):_ Street trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 required that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The property has 205 feet of frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. There are 2 existing trees which will be retained at the southern portion of the lot which will serve as street trees. The applicant has shown 5 additional Norway Maple trees will be planted. The 2 trees closest to the access drive will be within the vision clearance area. These trees are not necessary due to the location of the existing trees and spacing of the remaining proposed trees. The landscaping plan must be modified accordingly. Land Use Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 requires that at a minimum the buffer between a proposed Commercial use and residential use must contain a 6-10 foot buffer with lawn/groundcover shrubs and screening. The property to the west is zoned C-N, however, the existing use is single-family residential. The applicant must, therefore, provide for a buffer based on the matrix in Table 18.745.2. The applicant's plans show the building will be set back less than 2 feet from the western property line. The plans will need to be revised to show a minimum 6-foot buffer with landscaping and screening based on the buffer width provided. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 6 OF 18 • ' The applicant's landscape plan shows that, even after the 15-foot dedication, there will be 5 feet of landscaping around the perimeter of the parking lot. The applicant has indicated that Azaleas and Rock Cottoneaster will be planted as parking lot screening. The landscape plan also shows that trees will be planted within the parking lot that will meet the requirement of 1 tree for every 7 parking spaces. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant meets The conditions listed below, the standards wilf be met. CONDITIONS: Submit a revised landscape plan that provides at minimum, a 6-foot landscape buffer and 6-foot wall along the west property line. Modify the landscape plan to show the 2 trees closest to the access drive will be removed. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant's plans show some vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas. A condition has been imposed earlier in this decision requiring 2 of the proposed street trees to be deleted from the landscape plan. There is additional vegetation proposed within the vision clearance area that must be modified to be located outside of the vision clearance area. Alternatively, the applicant may provide documentation that indicates the vegetation proposed will not grow higher than 3 feet in height. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have not been fully met, however, compliance with the condition listed below will insure that this standard is met. CONDITION: Modify the landscape plan to show no vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle that is greater than 3 feet in height or that has no limbs below 8 feet in height. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 21 parking spaces, therefore, 1 ADA parking space is required. Because at least 1 space must be van accessible, the proposed space must be van accessible with a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle. The applicants plans show a handicap access aisle that is 8 feet wide, but there is no adjacent parking lot that is 9 feet wide and neither space on either side of the access aisle are designated as handicap. A condition is warranted to meet this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 7 OF 18 Access drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street arking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is actually regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and will be discussed further in this decision. Vision clearance has been previously addressed. Pedestrian access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. There is a walkway from the street to the building which does not require crossing a parking lot, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Parking lot striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show 21 parking spaces clearly marked, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Wheel stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans indicate wheel stops will be installed for all proposed parking spaces. Space and aisle dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space and 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans do not clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. Staff attempted to scale the parking spaces and it appears that there are 7 compact spaces, 14 standard spaces. However, this is a copy and staff can not confirm that each space meets the required dimensions. Because staff is not comfortable that each space was scaled accurately, a condition of approval will be imposed requiring the applicant to submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap space may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 8 OF 18 • Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The proposed bicycle rack is within 50 feet of the entrance to the building and is not located in parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Bicycle parking design requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well-drained. The applicant has not provided detail of the bicycle parking rack, therefore, staff can not determine of this standard has been met. If the applicant submits a detail of the bicycle rack, staff will be able to review it to insure that the design complies with the standards of the code. The space dedicated to bicycle parking is 4 feet by 6 feet . Minimum bicycle parking requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.768.2 states that for office uses, .5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Because the building is 5,228 square feet, 2.6 bicycle parking spaces are required. When rounded up as required, 3 spaces must be provided. The applicant has indicated that 2 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. The applicant must revise the plan to provide 3 bicycle parking spaces. Minimum off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for an office use is 2.7 spaces per 1 ,000 square feet and because the site is in parking zone B, the maximum parking is 4.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposed building size is 5,228 square feet, therefore, the minimum parking is 14 spaces and the maximum is a total of 21 parking spaces. The applicant has shown 21 spaces will be provided. If the building size is adjusted, however, the parking may need to be reduced accordingly. Because staff is not certain if the buffering and screening requirement discussed previously will result in a reduction in building size, a condition will be imposed that states the parking must be re-calculated if the building size is reduced. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 9 OF 18 CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows a van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot-wide aisle. • Submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5, the compact spaces may not be less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap spaces may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. • Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. • Submit a revised plan that shows 3 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. • If, as a result of modifications made to meet other conditions, the building size is reduced below 5,228 square feet, the applicant must submit revised parking calculations to insure that the maximum parking space requirement Is not exceeded. Access, Egress and Circulation: Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's plans show a walkway will be provided from the ground floor entrance to the public street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkway provided to the building entrance does not cross an accessway, therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans indicate that the proposed walkway will be concrete and tie into the existing concrete sidewalk. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is 30 feet with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1 999-000 1 7NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 10 OF 18 The applicant has submitted a plan that shows a 30-foot-wide access will be provided with 30 feet of pavement, thus satisfying the criteria. Director's Authority to restrict access: Section 18.705.030.K states that in order to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial and industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections. The applicant has not provided a connection to adjacent properties. The property to the south has recently been developed with a daycare and a shared access easement was not required as part of that development, therefore, shared access with that property is not possible. Due to the location of the proposed building, shared access to the property to the north is not possible. The property to the west is undeveloped and zoned C-N and a future connection is possible. The applicant must slightly revise the plan to provide for a future connection to the property to the west. This is also discussed and justified in more detail further in this decision under public facility concerns. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the access and egress standards are not satisfied, however, if the applicant submits a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west. Tree Removal: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an arborist report that identifies all the trees over 6 caliper inches. There are 30 trees on the site over 12 inches caliper. Of those 30, 20 are considered hazardous and do not require mitigation. Therefore, there are 10 trees that are mitigatable. The applicant has proposed to retain 4 of these trees. If the applicant can save the remaining 6 trees, the mitigation amount will be 113 inches. If, in the course of construction, it is determined that additional trees must be removed because they can not be saved, the mitigation amount will change, as may the street tree planting requirement. The applicant has not indicated how the required inches will be mitigated. The arborist has identified tree preservation methods to insure that the trees to remain will not be harmed during construction. A condition of approval will be imposed requiring the tree protection measures to be in place prior to any site work and maintained throughout the construction. FINDING: Because no mitigable trees over 12 inches will be removed, the Tree Removal standards have been satisfied, however, a condition will be attached insuring that the trees to remain are not harmed during construction. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. Prior to issuance of site or building permit, submit a tree mitigation plan showing how the 113 caliper inches will be mitigated (on-site, off-site or by paying a fee in-lieu). If the fee in-lieu option is chosen, this fee must be paid prior to issuance of building permits. If on or off-site mitigation is proposed, a bond for the replanting of 113 caliper inches must be provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 11 OF 18 Prior to Final Inspection, trees numbered 5, 56, 63 and 64 may not be removed without prior approval from the planning staff and re-calculation of mitigation requirements. Signs: Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C- G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS Streets: TDC 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. TDC 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is under the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) jurisdiction. ODOT staff submitted comments, dated October 7, 1999, to the City with regard to this application. Their comments are considered part of this decision. This roadway classification requires a right-of-way width of 90 feet. At present, there is only 30 feet of ROW on the west side of the centerline. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide 45 feet from centerline to meet City standards. This dedication should be conveyed to ODOT using their forms. The applicant's plan indicates that they will dedicate the ROW as described. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to this site. The plans indicate the applicant will install a new commercial driveway to serve the development. ODOT's comments indicate that a permit will be required for that work. Driveway Concern ODOT is concerned with the proposed access location and the lack of depth of the proposed driveway throat. When SW Hall Boulevard widened in the future, as anticipated by the Transportation Plan, the depth of the driveway throat will be even shorter. The concern is that onsite traffic flow will potentially back up into the public roadway potentially causing rear-end collisions. ODOT suggests the applicant reconfigure the location or shape of the building to minimize these conflicts. Neither ODOT or the City have a development code standard for the depth of a driveway throat. Because of this, Staff does not believe the City could require the applicant to reconfigure or relocate the building. 18.705.030.G.3 states that in no case shall the design of a service driveway require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street. Staff believes the driveway and parking configuration is such that cars should not need to back into Hall Boulevard to exit the site. Therefore, Staff supports the applicant's plan. However, Staff encourages the applicant to explore other options that would enable the driveway throat to increase in size. There is another partial solution that Staff believes would improve the situation. Staff recommends the applicant be required to grant a crossover access easement to the parcel immediately west of this site (1S1 35AA, Tax Lot 1900) and configure their parking area to allow for a future drive aisle connection to the adjacent parcel. In the future, when Tax Lot 1900 is developed, the City can require a crossover easement on that parcel and make sure a physical drive aisle is constructed between the two sites. At that time, all access from both parcels could be directed to SW 87 Avenue, or be split between SW Hall Boulevard and SW 87 Avenue. If ODOT finds that the SW Hall Boulevard driveway is problematic in the future, they could require it to be closed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 12 OF 18 Water: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The applicant's plans indicate that they will need to obtain service from the main line in SW Hall Boulevard. A permit from TVWD must be obtained prior to construction. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing public sanitary sewer line located in SW Hall Boulevard that can serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates they will connect to this line and extend a service lateral to the site. The ODOT permit will need to cover the street cut and patch work, and a separate permit from the City will be necessary to cover the connection to the sewer line. Storm Drainage: The topography of this site falls to the east. The applicant is proposing to route the onsite runoff to the southeast corner of the site where it will be treated and detained in a vegetated pond. From there, the water will be conveyed to the existing storm drainage system in SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT's comments indicate the applicant will need to obtain approval from them for the design of the detention pond. The ODOT approval must be obtained prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate that they will provide a treatment pond at the southeast corner of the site. The preliminary sizing calculations indicate the pond will need a volume of approximately 208 cubic feet. However, the engineer indicates they will likely design the pond to have a volume of approximately 500 cubic feet. It appears there is ample room on the site for this pond. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. Section 18.810.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 206 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $5,665. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 13 OF 18 • Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assignin addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary SB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee s all be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the site plan and proposal, does not meet the Street and Utility Improvement Standards, however, if the applicant complies with conditions 15 through 25 specified at the beginning of this decision, the standards will be met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has proposed a 9-foot x 10-foot screened enclosure. The applicant indicates that the franchise hauler method would be used and indicated that they had received approval for the location proposed. The applicant stated that an approval letter had been obtained and that a copy was included in the submittal package, however, staff could not locate a letter from Pride Disposal. A condition of approval is warranted for the applicant to submit a copy of the approval letter from Pride Disposal for the location of the trash enclosure. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, Staff can not determine if this standard has been met. If the applicant provides a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the location and size of the facility is adequate, this criterion will be met. CONDITION: Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use), 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 14 OF 18 • Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building has been located on the site with consideration of the existing trees, access and surrounding lots. The site is flat and not subject to slumping. The location of the building will continue to maintain adequate distance between neighboring buildings. Staff has determined that this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and asked that a lighting plan be provided for review and approval FINDING: Because the Police Department has determined that a lighting plan is needed, the Crime Prevention and Safety Standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit a lighting plan for the Police Department review and approval. Public transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The project has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard which is on a Tri-met transit route. Staff did not receive any comments or objections from Tri-met regarding the need for a transit facility in this location, therefore, staff has determined that this standard is satisfied. FINDING: Because no comments were received from Tri-met regarding the need for additional transit facilities at this location, staff has determined that this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the underlying zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for office use NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 15 OF 18 The proposed office use is listed as a permitted use within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. The C-N zone has the following special limitations set forth in 18.520.050.A: (1)The use shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed structure, except as allowed in Section 3 below; (2) No use shall have a gross floor area greater than 4,000 square feet; (3) Accessory open-air sales, display and/or storage shall be permitted for horticultural and food merchandise only and shall constitute no more than 5% of the gross building floor area of any individual establishment; and (4) Uses operating before 7:00 AM and after 10:00 PM shall be subject to the conditional use provisions, as governed in Chapter 18.330. The use proposed will be contained wholly within the building. All future tenants must adhere to this standard as well. The proposed building is over 4,000 square feet, however, based on the floor plan provided, the optical clinic will be 2,776 square feet. Additional tenants will not exceed the requirement as long as the use is not a medical office. No open sales area is proposed. The applicant has not indicated the hours of business. A condition of approval is necessary requiring the applicant to submit written confirmation of the hours of operation in order for staff to confirm that the hours will not exceed 7:00AM to 10:00 PM. This written confirmation must also verify that all future tenants will be made aware of the zoning restrictions in this zone. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table, the proposal fully complies with the exception of the front yard setback which the applicant has requested a variance to reduce it to the proposed 5 feet, after dedication. STANDARD C-N Proposed Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq. ft 16,965 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 206 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 20 ft. 5 ft [4] - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A - Side yard 0/20 ft. [3] 3 ft - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [3] 1.6 ft Maximum height 35 ft. 17 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 79% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 21% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Setback after dedication. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: (1) East and north walls shall be of 1-hour fire resistive construction without openings and with parapet, (2) the windows within 10 feet of the property line on the angle wall to the southeast property line shall be protected. The wall within 20 feet shall be protected to 1-hour with parapet. No windows are permitted within 5 feet of property line, (3) All restrooms shall be accessible and door to shower 36" wide, (4) Submit fire flow worksheet to determine the number and placement of new fire hydrants, (5) Submit a fire hydrant flow test of new or existing fire hydrant within 250 feet of all exterior walls. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 16 OF 18 The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: Please contact TVWD for comments, all sanitary and storm to be "private". Ensure connection to sanitary manhole includes channel to direct solids into City sanitary sewer line. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the application and indicated that they would like to see a lighting plan for review and approval. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has not provided comments or objections. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: The proposed development is located on SW Hall Boulevard (OR 141). According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), this state facility is classified as a District highway. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient functioning of this state facility. We request that the City include the following ODOT requirements in the conditions of approval: ODOT permits are required for access to the state highway, for all work in the State right-of- way, and for connection to the State's drainage system Contact Ed Miller, Permit Specialist, ODOT District 2A at 229-5002 for information on the written permit process. The driveway must be designed to minimize possible blocking of the driveway flow, to minimize internal site circulation conflicts and to minimize adverse effects on the flow of traffic on the highway. The lack of depth of the driveway's throat could cause vehicles exiting or entrancing the driveway to conflict with vehicles pulling in and out of the eight parking spaces along the building's front entrance. Vehicles exiting the driveway may cause vehicles entering the driveway to back-up onto Hall Boulevard and potentially cause rear-end accidents. These potential vehicular conflicts are even more likely when Hall Boulevard is widened and the 15-foot right-of-way section is paved over for an additional lane and new sidewalk. The site plan should be revise to address these concerns. Possible solutions to address these concerns are reconfiguration of the building's shape or relocation of the building. Curb and sidewalks along the property's highway frontage shall be built according to ODOT and ADA standards. If the property drains naturally to the State's system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition for the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. ODOT supports the City's requirement to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way on Hall Boulevard to meet the City's right-of-way width of 90 feet (45 feet from centerline) for an arterial, which is Hall Boulevards street classification. Staff response: The ODOT comments have been reviewed and discussed in detail under the public facility concerns section of this decision. Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated into the body of this decision. TCI, PGE, US West, GTE, Tri-Met, NW Natural Gas, and Tualatin Valley Water District have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 -REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 17 OF 18 SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 1999, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 1999. Quest ions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171 . gxel November 10, 1999 PREPARED Y: Julia Powe Hajduk DATE Associate Planner November 10, 1999 PREPARED BY: Richard H. wersdorff DATE Planning Manager is\curpin\julia\sdr\Redwood center2.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00017NAR1999-00021 —REDWOOD CENTER PAGE 18 OF 18 , -0.Li., .,v;:-r.., ,, ._____ _ ...„.„. .„ . -1,, „,.....: , 1 , A.. 4,c, , 1.,,,: „...--,-•:9 . . - , h I -, ! . II NEW BUILDING 1 i ! . ., ■ ' 1 • Z 1 a 0' . 77— -;...--; , ..-- ./ • 1 - 1 , . ' jl •• • I. ., I > i-: _ .-... _L i t c .. il ....1, ...,. , - .4--, , . 0 . . 1 g s. .,I . 0 c,• cz Z . . -1 Q _, W Z � `• ,� J - m i kN . . 1 Q .1 • j fr = 0 \E t.!,., s ._ g , ---(17-7\\ LL ,� U • • ! 1 , c ,_.I . �, �.• o S -1/ --j___ -- - • - • , - Js.,►w ,v.� rvnis.�a.n. 0. 01 1 I;010 hQ`416 PO* udy✓ Q∎�I r • -a1 '-)Nf aA ; SITE PLAN t SDR 1 999-00017 EXHIBIT MAP N VAR1999-00021 .(map is not to scale) REDWOOD CENTER `� CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ST HEMLOCK VICINITY MAP 1 CNI / SDR1999-00017 ST LARCH VAR 1999-00021 7 ;t, H - REDWOOD / 'II/ CENTER ST f - Q 1 ( 1■17 ■ -� OCUST lir 1 p ii m��. , P' = SUBJECT IIIIII- w CO `SITE J• '- p.p.- MAPLELEAF T � Q • .iaa IlL . pli II'% MAPLELEAF ST Mr III Illiplippli C°I. ■ ST OAK ST J •AK I N / ___ ____ 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet PINE ST I 1=378 feet HPINE ST _ — City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and I l I should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd• R CE ST i SRRUCE Tigard,OR 97223 _ ST (503)639-4171 r--� I httplemew.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Sep 21, 1999; C:\magicIMAGIC03.APR • S D k1gq9-00017 • Wayne Gerig Terrance and Mary Johnston 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle P.O. Box 1608 EXHIBIT B Beaverton, OR 97007-8225 Tualatin, OR 97062 Jim Griffith and Associates Aldie Howard Gene and Vivian Davis 1820 SW Vermont St., Suite K 10875 SW 89 St. Portland, Or 97219 Tigard, OR 97223 Pamela Alegria Development Review Planner Oregon Department of Transportation/Region 1 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY Of noueo Community/Development SCwpingA Better Community STATE OAF OREGON ) • County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley G. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appraprtate Box(a)Babw) n NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR:I (Type,Kind of Nonce) (File No/Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) El City of Tigard Planning Director ® NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-00017/VAR1999-00021-REDWOOD CENTER ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No!Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Punic Hearng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council n NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: Cl AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",on the 10th day of November ,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 10th day of November , 1999, postage prepaid. ,4-1( dittia.t. ( erson that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7'7'11 day of e‘A, iii.--�. 4 — �" _OFFICIAL SEAL NOT V RY PUBLIC OF OREGON mss. /3 20(.13 �/ ►�ornt�► �� My Commission Expires: - COMMISSION Nn MY Di MMISSIONExpiiii . al03 Fxrn NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR) 1999-00017 ADJUSTMENT [VAR) 1999-00021 CITY OF TIOARD Community(Development REDWOOD CENTER Shaping)Better Community 120 DAYS = 1/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: REDWOOD CENTER CASE NO.: Site Development Review SDR1999-00017 Adjustment VAR1999-00021 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant has also requested a variance to the front yard setback to reduce the setback from 20 feet to 5. APPLICANT: Wayne Gerig OWNER: Terrance & Mary Johnston 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle PO Box 1608 Beaverton, OR 97007 Tualatin, OR 97062 PLANNING Jim Griffith and Assoc. CONSULTANT Aldie Howard 1820 SW Vermont St. Suite K Portland, OR 97219 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S 135AA, Tax Lot 1901. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: ■ THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 1999 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 1999. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. {`" ,' , Fp,.l NEW BUILDING I 1111 i G • ° vl I 1 1 u f v Js � a \\ 0 /' i < C �� I �' c f F lit II E -1 1,1 Fafc 4L :iI Grz1 SITE PLAN f SDR1999-00017 EXHIBIT MAP N VARI999-0002I REDWOOD CENTER 1 j__ 1__. 11 _l� v_I I 11 1 ...._ R _ --- L VICINITY MAP M■L. I Tf i 1`r SDR1999-00017 AT _ I �Cu VAR 1999-00021 1' , I 1 1 ' / l}�;1 - 1_1 1 ' m Lli -�- -- REDWOOD 1 - _ CENTER 1- A� 111 ilia IIIIII—_i I Ir, - I' /� = , -�- blow ___L_ ' - ' 1. I Ai ' N / 'I I _ 'I ww.. J _ fT IL I ®.a — .II'.. : _ III --- [ III ,:,,a • . Community Deveapment I ■ 1S126DD-03100 1S126DD-90000 EXHIBIT B OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION THE METZGER PARK CONDO 621 SW MORRISON STE 725 8959 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S126DD-90118 1S126DD-90123 SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA SALARI MOHSEN 6023 SW ORCHID DR 8978 SW 76TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DD-90124 1 S 126DD-90220 NADRI KAZEM KEN& SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA 14473 SW 134TH 6023 SW ORCHID DR TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S126DD-90225 1S126DD-90226 ARCHITECT TED N&KIMBERLY S TR CARVER GREGORY A AND 9805 NE SHAVER 10010 SW HALL BLVD#16 MAYWOOD PARK,OR 97220 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DD-90322 1S126DD-90327 SAYRS FRANK C AND MARY V B PETERSEN JEROME E BOX 108 10010 SW HALL BLVD#17 MORO,OR 97039 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DD-90328 1S135AA-00102 ALKEKHIA MAJD METZGER PARK APARTMENTS INC 16139 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 2614 TIGARD,OR 97223 PASADENA,CA 91102 1S135AA-00200 1S135AA-00301 PERSEVERANCE LLC HAYZLETT MAXINE TR 4028 SW PATTON RD 17015 SW ELDORADO DR PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-00302 1S135AA-00305 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN SILLS DONALD N ET AL 8701 SW LOCUST ST 10115 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00390 1S135AA-00400 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN TURNER STEVEN R 8701 SW LOCUST ST PO BOX 25216 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97298 1S135AA-00401 1S135AA-00500 ROWE SHIRLEY I BRAWAND CHARLES 1027 SW GROVER 10125 NW RIVEN WOOD PORTLAND,OR 97201 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00600 EIDENSCHINK IRMA BRAWAND CHARLES 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND,OR 97223 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00700 1S135AA-00701 WESTON JOSEPH E TIGARD CITY OF 2154 NE BROADWAY 13125 SW HALL PORTLAND,OR 97232 TIGARD,OR 97223 13135AA-00800 1S135AA-00803 NASH GORDON 0 AND PENNY J HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D 10231 SW JEFFERSON 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-00804 1S135AA-00805 LAI KHOAN VAN& VO VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01000 MILLS MICHAEL E AND ROWE SHIRLEY I AND WOOD 10211 SW JEFFERSON 1027 SW GROVER TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-01400 ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST 7520 SW LANDAU ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-01600 VALLASTER GARRY J FRIES PATRICIA S 711 SW ALDER-PENTHOUSE 10225 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01601 1S135AA-01602 WALP MATT AND CINDY TAYLOR RICHARD L 10207 SW 85TH AVE 10245 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01700 1S135AA-01701 SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-01702 1S135AA-01800 SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN CHAVEZ HELEN W 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 8407 SW LOCUST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-01901 BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT JOHNSTON TERRANCE F& 10250 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 1608 PORTLAND,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135AA-02000 1S135AA-02100 STARTS SANDRA LYNN NORTHLAND HOMES INC PO BOX 20007 1834 SW 58TH#202 KEIZER,OR 97307 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02200 1S135AA-02201 NORTHLAND HOMES INC LANDER GENE C&ANNA H 1834 SW 58TH#202 10375 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02202 1S135AA-02300 HARDING ROBERT B GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON 4130 SW ALICE 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02302 13135AA-02303 LEE CARL M MARKELL KIMBERLY D 8505 SW OAK ST 10405 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02304 1S135AA-02305 ALLEN MARILYN L GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND 8525 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 151 35AA-02400 1S1 35AA-02500 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY 10440 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02600 1S135AA-02700 PETERSON THEODORE S AND HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 8686 SW OAK 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02801 1S135AA-03700 EMMERT TERRY W DEMOULIN STEVE& 11811 SE HWY 212 10455 SW 87TH AVE CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-03702 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S CULLINAN RANDY J AND 8805 SW OAK ST 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03703 1S135AA-03704 BRANDT WALDO G&PEARL E DE MOULIN STEVE& 8835 SW OAK ST 10455 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03705 1S135AA-03707 ROMERO MERCEDES G AND HITCH DORIS 10385 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 35 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 18135AA-03800 1S135AA-90000 LASHAWAY JULIE A DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS 8875 SW OAK OWNERS OF UNITS TIGARD,OR 97223 , 0 1S135AA-90001 1S135AA-90002 PETTY JOHN A HAWLEY HAZEL M 10301 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA-90004 SHERWOOD SYDNEY L CONSER JEAN H AND 10305 SW 87TH 10307 SW 87TH#4 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90005 1S135AA-90006 LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M TAYLOR J EDWARD AND 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90007 1S135AA-90008 CONNET CARLEE SUE MORGAN DEANNA F 10313 SW 87TH 10315 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90009 1S135AA-90010 HAWLEY HAZEL M FLETCHER MARY K 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 16388 SW ESTURARY#101 PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 1S135AD-01200 Jim Griffith & Associates DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M Aldie Itward 10875 SW 89TH AVE 1820 3^I Vernmnt St., Spite K TIGARD,OR 97223 Fprtla- , CR 97219 Tarrance arrd Mory Jchnstcn Wayne C-Prig P.O. Box 1E08 1530 Snl mite Ci rcle Italatin, CR 9t2 & verton, CR 97007-8225 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING cm OF nonrtn ` Community Development Shaping yI Better Community STATE OAF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Eatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR1999-00011/VAR1999-00021 - REDWOOD CENTER AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) E City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director C NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: C AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) • City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council U NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: it, (Fde No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearng,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEIS] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", c n the 22nd day of September„1999, .nd deposited in the United States Mail on the 22"d day of Se I tembe 1999, post•=- •rep. .. e;:z,./6 \ • A(Peron th- °reoare,Nof - / _ Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before m- on the et—day of 19 . ••=1"., OFFICIAL SEAL A._1 l// " DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-ORE-DON 1uh y COMMISSION NO.326578 My Commission Expires: 9/7 c�Gr'23 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN!. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI' A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE.IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping)/Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: September 22, 1999 FILE NO(S): SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00017 VARIANCE (VAR) 1999-00021 FILE NAME: REDWOOD CENTER PROPOSAL: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810 LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S 135AA tax lot 1901. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 6. 1999. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address a relevant approval criteria with s ;,lent specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled Your Right to Provide Written Comments." - _ -- `+ ` - --- __ — CITY of TIGARD 1 HEMLOCK VICINITY MAP ST n 4----1.- Ali --,11 �1 - 1 SDRI999-00017 ST LARCH VAR 1999-00021 1 ' 171( lll �l _ = `� IIII REDWOOD ' CENTER A ' illt . I . 4 OCUST W� V Q.`SUBJECT IIIIIII SITE MAPLELEAF ST 'HWY TP - 1 7 All I I 1 I I p ST V / - ____ „ ., PINE ST pt a ST —J _'- \ �1J.d lIl Clry of Tigard ir- MsiC IMerrnaton on tn..map . xx„1 EXHP: IT B 1S126DD-03100 1S126DD-90000 OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION THE METZGER PARK CONDO 6?1 SW MORRISON STE 725 8959 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97205 PORTLAND, OR 97219 1S126DD-90118 1S126DD-90123 SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA SALARI MOHSEN 6023 SW ORCHID DR 8978 SW 76TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DD-90124 1S126DD-90220 NADRI KAZEM KEN& SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA 14473 SW 134TH 6023 SW ORCHID DR TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND, OR 97219 1S126DD-90225 1S126DD-90226 ARCHITECT TED N&KIMBERLY S TR CARVER GREGORY A AND 9805 NE SHAVER 10010 SW HALL BLVD#16 MAYWOOD PARK,OR 97220 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DD-90322 1 S 126DD-90327 SAYRS FRANK C AND MARY V B PETERSEN JEROME E BOX 108 10010 SW HALL BLVD#17 MORO,OR 97039 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S126DD-90328 1S135AA-00102 ALKEKHIA MAJD METZGER PARK APARTMENTS INC 16139 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 2614 TIGARD,OR 97223 PASADENA,CA 91102 15135AA-00200 15135AA-00301 PERSEVERANCE LLC HAYZLETT MAXINE TR 4028 SW PATTON RD 17015 SW ELDORADO DR PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-00302 1S135AA-00305 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN SILLS DONALD N ET AL 8701 SW LOCUST ST 10115 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00390 1S135AA-00400 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN TURNER STEVEN R 8701 SW LOCUST ST PO BOX 25216 TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97298 1S135AA-00401 1S135AA-00500 ROWE SHIRLEY I BRAWAND CHARLES 1027 SW GROVER 10125 NW RIVEN WOOD PORTLAND,OR 97201 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00600 EIDENSCHINK IRMA BRAWAND CHARLES 8140 SW LOCUST DRIVE 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND, OR 97223 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00700 1 35AA-00791 WESTON JOSEPH E TIGA C T OF 2154 NE BROADWAY 1312 ALL PORTLAND,OR 97232 ARD,OR 223 1S135AA-00800 1S135AA-00803 NASH GORDON 0 AND PENNY J HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D 10231 SW JEFFERSON 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-00804 1S135AA-00805 LAI KHOAN VAN& VO VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01000 MILLS MICHAEL E AND ROWE SHIRLEY I AND WOOD 10211 SW JEFFERSON 1027 SW GROVER TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-01400 ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST 7520 SW LANDAU ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-01600 VALLASTER GARRY J FRIES PATRICIA S 711 SW ALDER-PENTHOUSE 10225 SW 85TH PORTLAND, OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01601 1S135AA-01602 WALP MATT AND CINDY TAYLOR RICHARD L 10207 SW 85TH AVE 10245 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01700 1S135AA-01701 SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN SZAL�p �f & IREN 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 14550 H -REE TER TIGARD, OR 97224 T4GrARD,OR 97224 1S. 5AA-01702 1S135AA-01800 SZALV• t. O& IREN CHAVEZ HELEN W 14551 : HAZ ' E TER 8407 SW LOCUST ARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-01901 BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT JOHNSTON TERRANCE F& 10250 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 1608 PORTLAND,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135AA-02000 1S1. • -0210: STAATS SANDRA LYNN NORTH 'II HOMES INC PO BOX 20007 1834 : 5: - #212 KEIZER,OR 97307 TLAND,OR • 201 1S135AA-02200 1S135AA-02201 NORTHLAND HOMES INC LANDER GENE C&ANNA H 1834 SW 58TH#202 10375 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND, OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02202 1S135AA-02300 HARDING ROBERT B GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON 4130 SW ALICE 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND, OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02302 1S135AA-02303 LEE CARL M MARKELL KIMBERLY D 8505 SW OAK ST 10405 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02304 1S135AA-02305 ALLEN MARILYN L GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND 8525 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-02500 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY 10440 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02600 1S135AA-02700 PETERSON THEODORE S AND HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 8686 SW OAK 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02801 1S135AA-03700 EMMERT TERRY W DEMOULIN STEVE& 11811 SE HWY 212 10455 SW 87TH AVE CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 15135AA-03702 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S CULLINAN RANDY J AND 8805 SW OAK ST 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03703 1S135AA-03704 QRANDT WALDO G&PEARL E DE MOULIN STEVE& £',335 SW OAK ST 10455 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03705 1S135AA-03707 ROMERO MERCEDES G AND HITCH DORIS 10385 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 35 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON, OR 97075 1 S 135AA-03800 1 5AA-9000 LASHAWAY JULIE A DEODA DOMINIUMS 8875 SW OAK OW S OF TS TIGARD,OR 97223 0 1S135AA-90001 1S135AA-90002 PETTY JOHN A HAWLEY HAZEL M 10301 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA-90004 SHERWOOD SYDNEY L CONSER JEAN H AND 10305 SW 87TH 10307 SW 87TH#4 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90005 1S135AA-90006 LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M TAYLOR J EDWARD AND 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90007 1S135AA-90008 CONNET CARLEE SUE MORGAN DEANNA F 10313 SW 87TH 10315 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135AA-90009 1S135AA-90010 HAWLEY HAZEL M FLETCHER MARY K 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 16388 SW ESTURARY#101 PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 1 S 135AD-01200 DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 APPLICANT MATERIALS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW �:� '� TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: P ` -�/� DATE OF PRE-APP.: y%/77 Property Address/Location(s): Of f Hall Blvd. between J FOR STAFF USE ONLY Locust and Oak Streets. C6-03 `',,e Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 1S 1 35AA Case No.(s): SCR 'I999-00o17 Lot 1901 Other Case No.(s): VAR 1999-0302-1 Site Size: 16,96516,965 Square. Feet Receipt No.: 9q"3/76 8 Application Accepted By: a°A/ Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: /--/6-9 9 Address: Phone: City: Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Wayne Gerig 15 30 SW Bobwhite Circle Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: City: Eaverton Zip: 97007-8225 • CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. /Application Form pplication Elements Submitted: ,A PROPOSAL SUMMARY 2/ Application Signature/VVritten Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): 0/Site/Plot Design Review for proposed development ( of copies Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check listVee and variance request for front yard setback. V Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'h"x 11") Applicant's Statement (#of copies bas d on pre-a p check listV ' as Estimate M USA Sewer Use Information Card Distributed/completed at application submittal) 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped /egal Size Envelopes Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999). . $1,600.00/ ($1 Million&Over) •00- (+$5/$10,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be consideied as part o application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted heThewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked it'it is found that any such statements are false. • • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this /U/ day of G1I-/o , 19,E 7 JO owner's Si ature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 CITY OF TIGARD Community rDe•vetopment S�apm,q)I Better(ommunity LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS =1/13/00 FILE NO(S).: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW [SDRI 1999-00017 VARIANCE [VARI 1999-00021 FILE TITLE: REDWOOD CENTER APPLICANT: Wayne Gerig OWNER: Terrance and Mary Johnston 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle PO Box 1608 Beaverton, OR 97007-8225 Tualatin, OR 97062 PLANNING Jim Griffith and Assocaites CONSULTANT: Aldie Howard 1820 SW Vermont St, Suite K Portland, OR 97219 REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct a 5,228 square foot office building and associated site improvements. The applicant is also requesting a variance to the front yard setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the west side of SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA tax lot 1901. ZONE: Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, REVIEW 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CRITERIA: CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: September 22, 1999 DUE: October 6,1999 © STAFF DECISION TENTATIVE DATE OF DECISION: 11/12/99 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP © NARRATIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY © ARCHITECTUAL PLAN © SITE PLAN © LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TECH REPORT © TREE REPORT p WATER QUALITY REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407 SDR1999-00017 REDWOOD CENTER LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: 6014 FOR Date: 6 2.3 91 LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE [I (INCOMPLETE C 144-1-461415> (TCa.M.S WIM_IG Existing and proposed contours shown? E4 Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes ['�No UK Adjacent parcel grades shown? ST13.EET ISSUES Q' Right-of-way clearly shown? _1=1 Centerline of street clearly shown? Name of street(s) shown? a aExisting/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets [ h Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? CI EkA Traffic study required/submitted? [r Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? E Check widths proposed on public streets ❑ 4A Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: SAN TARY SEWER ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? P' Stubs to adjacent parcels required? pER ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? EK Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES C Existing/proposed lines? IIUP Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? r • er quality facility shown on plan? . � ,- CI does area provided match calculations for size requirement? bs to adjacent properties required? Er Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? iienglbrianAmasters\public facility plan checklist.doc September 3, 1999 itsiikkaa CITY OF TIGARD Wayne Gerig OREGON 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, OR 97007-8225 RE: Wayne Gerig Office Building, SDR 1999-00017 Incompleteness Lette VAR /9g9-00024 Dear Mr. Gerig: The City of Tigard received your application submittal for Site Development Review at the property identified as 1S135AA, tax lot 1901. After a preliminary review of the submittal items, Staff has determined that the following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review: v- • Provide a list of the property owners within 500 feet that was used for the envelopes you submitted. It appears that you had the City prepare your list for your neighborhood meeting, however, that was over three months ago and is no longer valid. In any event, staff quickly reviewed the list you utilized for the neighborhood meeting and found that many names on that list did not have corresponding envelopes (18) and there were 5 envelopes for people that were not included on this list. We will need a revised list of property owners that accurately lists all property owners within 500 feet. The City can generate a list of property owners for you for a fee of $11. There is an additional charge of $2 per sheet of labels (20 names/addresses per sheet, 2 columns/10 per column) that is charged, however, the total cost for running the list can not be determined until the task is completed and the number of sheets containing the list is identified. if you would like the list printed on labels. If you would like to pick up your envelopes to re-label, please contact me so that I can make sure they are available for you. Please be aware that we need a copy of the list utilized for the property owner notice in 1" x 4" (20 names/address per sheet, 2 colums/10 per column) label format so that we can send out additional notices if needed. • Please provide an existing conditions map that clearly shows the adjacent properties and is separate from the site plan. This is primarily needed because there is so much information being provided on the plans and the copy is very poor. Please show more of the adjacent property on an existing conditions plan. There are structures shown to the south and east, however, staff can not determine if the distances are to scale and, there is nothing shown on the property to the north. Because the copy is very poor, it makes it difficult for staff to read the plans, especially the dimensions. It is hard to tell if the 10-foot pedestrian easement is on-site, off-site or straddling the property line. While it appears that your plans are showing both existing and proposed site improvements, it is difficult to differentiate what changes will occur. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 -age o • Submit the fee for the requested Variance. You paid $1,600 for the Site Development Review, however, no money was submitted for the requested variance. Because the variance is in conjunction with an SDR, you are only required to pay 20% of the regular fee, therefore, the necessary fee for the Variance is $109. • Submit preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility. • Provide written authorization from the existing property owners and a deed to show ownership. While it is understood that Wayne Gerig is the contract purchaser, there is no evidence submitted that he is authorized to sign for the existing property owner or even that he is in fact, the contract purchaser. • Please provide confirmation of the project name. The project name is currently listed as Wayne Gerig Office Building. All cases in the computer must be tied to a project name. The Site Development Review case creates the project name for all other cases to be built from (Building and Engineering), therefore, it is very important that we have an accurate project name at this stage. While name changes may be permitted at a later date, there may be a fee charged to cover the administrative costs of making changes in our computer systems, therefore, if the name we have is not what you will be referring to the building as when applying for your building permits, please inform us now so that we can make the necessary changes. • Address buffering standards for the existing residential use to the west. Because the use to the west is residential, buffering and screening is required. Please address how you are going to achieve the buffering and screening standards or submit justification for a variance and an additional variance fee. Once the information listed above has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and schedule it for review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, ulia Powell Ha duk Associate Planner I:curpin\julia\sdr\sdr99-17acc.doc c: Aldie Howard, 1820 SW Vermont Street, Suite K, Portland, OR 97219 SDR1999-00017 Land Use file 9/3/99 Wayne Gerig Letter Page 2 of 2 Re: SDR1 999-000 1 7 Incompleteness Review I f RECEIVED arLe,v- u-1 - SEP 1 3 1999 )s (5.v%c_st. 9 A,j01,1 11Y DEVELOPMLI% r, 1,,,.R.,,. aie" N tA1-> re I cl g a1 - (3001-7_ ln/A y v-t Gx.'"1 vz lnv i NR9m-A 0 T C'(NL v ' o\, yo ` U" Srr- ) WO-1-1 L- G6(1 ) RECEIVED SEP 1 3 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMLii Re = p 4--o\e c 1J pc,,„, - - S v -.o,.- Divv ew qq5 -Goa t�. lS1 ) r• Tex l501 0,1„, L-05-fAri tt W N.( e L. C e (k i.`) 0.0_ • Sr k, rY • September 17, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Wayne Gerig 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, OR 97007-8225 RE: Wayne Gerig Office Building,(Redwood Center) SDR 1999-00017 Completeness Letter Dear Mr. Gerig: The City of Tigard has received the additional information required in our September 3, 1999 incompleteness letter. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete as of September 16, 1999 and has been scheduled for review. Staff has set a target decision date of November 12, 1999. I realize this is after your closing date, however, given current work load, this is the earliest date that could be scheduled. As this is a target date only, the actual decision may be issued slightly before or after the target date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x407. I will be out of the office from September 21 to October 6th If you have questions that cannot wait until I am back in the office, please direct them to Dick Bewersdorff. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:curpin\julia1sdrlsdr99-17acc2.doc c: Aldie Howard, 1820 SW Vermont Street, Suite K, Portland, OR 97219 SDR1999-00017 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 -age o I 1 I r 1 CITY of TIGARD ST / GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM... IR / ' AREA NOTIFIED .. , 500' � "' re: 1 S 135AA 1901 1220 For Wayne Gerig 151350000301 ;F U127 i 151260003100 , 101160090226 ' 1513511000107= ST 101350.7100390 101350000305 1013500011200 N. H 151350000700 151350000302 Q 1513511000101 7513 500 00 6 0 3 try 161556090400 • I h 101351111110804 r— LOCI t .` 511000800 .J I 13W5M00805 "If T 0 I 1'S135M81B11; , - i [. i� 151350000500 157350001400 131850001500 --- 151350000806(L �/ CO t 1$1i5M01gM:.: 151350000800 L,/ w W ---_ __.-_— 181850006007 ' Q 101850001101 > 751350000590 18185000191 101350001000 iii��Ly,,,,��` 751850001800 L i± 121350001101 S1350* 7 0 151350090000 IMAPLEL 151350090008 I t - --151850000401 101350090007 101354090003 ! 1 1513500011001S1256090009101356090005 I z 1513 500 0 2 202 101350090010 151350090001 101350002000 15735000P100 100 7 2 21 101350.00370 r-.,151350003707 r i 151350003100 I 151350002300 'r., CO 101350002500 10135440Pi07 .. . .. ..,151350003800 151350003704 151350002400 i 151350002304 151350003701 -:"✓ 7013500 0 2 302 A 151351100379 3 ,�.7 L i } I.I, N 151850003702 Cs`.r _ AK mu*7 - � - 7..... - 0 100 200- - 300 Feet [, i5135M02600 151350002700 1"=252 feet 1411 _� iS13S00012110 - F:I r City of Tigard * J Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. PINE ST 13125 SW Hall Blvd PIVE Tigard,OR 97223 e �� ! _ -— r (503)639-4171 4 http://a.CI tIgard or on COnwsulily Development Plot date' Sep 13, 1999; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • 1 v/ 1 S 126DD-03100 1S126DD-90000 OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION THE METZGER PARK CONDO 621 SW MORRISON STE 725 8959 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S126DD-90118 1S126DD-90123 SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA SALARI MOHSEN 6023 SW ORCHID DR 8978 SW 76TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DD-90124 1 S 126DD-90220 NADRI KAZEM KEN& SHM VSK ARK&MARGARITA 14473 SW 134TH 6023 S CHID DR TIGARD,OR 97224 POR AND, 97219 1S1260D-90225 /\ 1S126DD-90226 ARCHITECT TED N&KIMBERLY S TR CARVER GREGORY A AND 9805 NE SHAVER 10010 SW HALL BLVD#16 MAYWOOD PARK,OR 97220 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DD-90322 /\ 15126DD-90327 SAYRS FRANK C AND MARY V B PETERSEN JEROME E BOX 108 10010 SW HALL BLVD#17 MORO,OR 97039 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DD-90328 ,l 1S135AA-00102 ALKEKHIA MAJD METZGER PARK APARTMENTS INC 16139 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 2614 TIGARD, OR 97223 PASADENA,CA 91102 1S135AA-00200 1S135AA-00301 h PERSEVERANCE LLC HAYZLETT MAXINE TR 4028 SW PATTON RD 17015 SW ELDORADO DR PORTLAND, OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 135AA-00302 A. 1 S 135AA-00305 !\ JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN SILLS DONALD N ET AL 8701 SW LOCUST ST 10115 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-0 990 1 S 135AA-00400 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN TURNER STEVEN R 8701 SW LOCUST ST PO BOX 25216 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97298 1S135AA-00401 f ,, 1S135AA-00500 ,\ ROWE SHIRLEY I BRAWAND CHARLES 1027 SW GROVER 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND, OR 97201 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00600 EIDENSCHINK IRMA BRAWAND CHARLES 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND;OR 97223 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00700 1S1 5AA-0070 WESTON JOSEPH E TIGA' I CI OF 2154 NE BROADWAY 13125 S∎• HALL PORTLAND,OR 97232 TIG•'I,O' =7223 1S135AA-00800 1S135AA-00803 NASH GORDON 0 AND PENNY J HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D 10231 SW JEFFERSON 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-00804 X 1S135AA-00805 y� LAI KHOAN VAN& VO VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01000 MILLS MICHAEL E AND ROWE SHIRLEY I AND WOOD 10211 SW JEFFERSON 1027 SW GROVER TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97201 1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-01400 ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST 7520 SW LANDAU ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-01600 VALLASTER GARRY J FRIES PATRICIA S 711 SW ALDER-PENTHOUSE 10225 SW 85TH PORTLAND, OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01601 -x 1S135AA-01602 WALP MATT AND CINDY TAYLOR RICHARD L 10207 SW 85TH AVE 10245 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-01700 � 1 S 135AA-01701 SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN SZALVAY LASZLO& IREN 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135 -017 1S135AA-01800 SZALVAY SZLO&IREN CHAVEZ HELEN W 14550 SW AZ REE TER 8407 SW LOCUST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-01901 BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT JOHNSTON TERRANCE F& 10250 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 1608 PORTLAND,OR 97223 TUALATIN, OR 97062 1S135AA-02000 A1/4 1S 5AA-021 0 STAATS SANDRA LYNN NOR D HOMES INC PO BOX 20007 1834 #202 KEIZER,OR 97307 P TLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02200 1S135AA-02201 NORTHLAND HOMES INC LANDER GENE C&ANNA H 1834 SW 58TH#202 10375 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02202 A 1S135AA-02300 HARDING ROBERT B GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON 4130 SW ALICE 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02302 1S135AA-02303 '--)C LEE CARL M MARKELL KIMBERLY D 8505 SW OAK ST 10405 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02304 /)\ 1S135AA-02305 ALLEN MARILYN L GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND 8525 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AA-02400 \ 1S135AA-02500 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY 10440 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02600 \ 1S135AA-02700 PETERSON THEODORE S AND HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 8686 SW OAK 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02801 1S135AA-03700 EMMERT TERRY W DEMOULIN STEVE& 11811 SE HWY 212 10455 SW 87TH AVE CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-03702 1- \ CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S CULLINAN RANDY J AND 8805 SW OAK ST 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 X 1S135AA-03703 1S135AA-03704 BRANDT WALDO G&PEARL E DE MOULIN STEVE& 8835 SW OAK ST 10455 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03705 ` 1S135AA-03707 ROMERO MERCEDES G AND HITCH DORIS 10385 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 35 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 1S 135AA-03800 V\ S 135AA-900 LASHAWAY JULIE A DE AR�CSNDOMINIUMS 8875 SW OAK OWNE OF UNITS TIGARD, OR 97223 , 0 k / 1S135AA-90001 \ 1S135AA-90002 PETTY JOHN A HAWLEY HAZEL M 10301 SW 87TH AVE 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA-90004 SHERWOOD SYDNEY L CONSER JEAN H AND 10305 SW 87TH 10307 SW 87TH#4 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90005 / 1S135AA-90006 LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M TAYLOR J EDWARD AND 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90007 \ 1S135AA-90008 CONNET CARLEE SUE MORGAN DEANNA F 10313 SW 87TH 10315 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90009�\ 1S135AA-90010 A HAWLEY HAZEL M FLETCHER MARY K 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 16388 SW ESTURARY#101 PORTLAND, OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 1S135AD-01200 DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 . p)\--k- --/ I to,A5 a1 -100 f-ems p -,( . W2--c th& T k G V-e_ 514 P � Q `Dv, RA.) t P.W, \ " r�� s tS1 3S$'AP�tP ( 1sf \io 1 ) ` �' 1iA-K `N-‘10i,.m4-e4 w. h t -c-, l/ 3ria - D fl- 1 qqi 1 -b 0611- ` 1 n C4,1,19 Vic r.�� l t \\\ \1e c . \,01,0 L c2-1 uj) 1 Ns.1 W.ti !gdiettliklAinI•ar.P Int .c$11291 wn.+atr,w neRMR±► w r1 42120 0 A r t. STATE OF OREGON 7:44ek 10, ?tit 5 qJ e#179V.4- County of Washington 8D I b, Mi,.ranra.7...Zahrtetan._.........K1.`____. I,Jerry - stinks ,,.. of A .D�.At..Bsoc_lail. mart an• Cri "f C:`"T+ •a Cownly ='110.1e—irtr- .g?rt2 Clerk for. C •• -+ • , '• MIN that ,:�.ry :: .:"` —` —" the NOM. f' • .X .,,4 y , no Nod and re.. row, ``•A,1:!1,3�I. nl saki , -' County,. * 't; --------------- -- p •; ; t;rib,;. . Affmr movie*toile ifWa.A.itVrw+laMt woo RSaefriGe 4. ..,!,;o`L. . . ran U , _P-A.�..,.�D.� 'Io.1dCU4k0a---- .^.—, suacaoamust alai Ulh�-• K•tiers,F�c- ;tar . - al•atta#-91egAn..9ZDA2. Doc : 20/15745 4M1+asgmeias s0.1,woeARtcit.u,eww»lk4,1,4=W Rect; 2169I4 13640 -Seolt.ea_al oua .Q/19/1998 09;13143em _.._._ ...-..• ..,».. _ P!R OONAL Ur LCENTATIWN AI RO THIS INDENTURE mode tale .14th.,.,-_____.__..---___ day of _.. --_—_.__. 1418-, by and beiweon •.-. Athy......Aecheoliretsrtet _—__.........—._—__-.,�--_-__-.--.-- the eely appointed.qualified and acdng personal ropteaC lativc of the cicala of .StevAll..Sr«-�C ..-- _-- — ---- - ------------ -.---. .,dereasad,harelrtafter called lb:first party, and trrence _6; naton on$Nary 73. Jittr QLIt...�b k .�LtfL iL-_ -.--___- hsreinafter celled**wand pity;WITNESSUTH: For value received and the conaldorallan here inviter stated,rho first pony hie granted,bargained,sold and conveyed,and by those presents doe:grant,birgaln,ieIl and convey unto the woad party aid atccond patty's bcirA,auCCO.ean and airing all the estate,right and interact of the tattle of olho deceased,whether acquired by operation of the law or otherwise,;Atha;certain real prop, crty altuated in the County of 0aehlttNCAn ,State of Oregon,desaribod as follows,to.wit: The Eagl half of Lot b, 81ock 370 MBTZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon. Together with that portion of vacated SW Muplaleaf street that inurad tharato by Ore= No. 78-182 recorded January 2, 1979, Fee No. 79000125. csa�' 4WRHIH6TON COUNTY a !t rr 14ttlMSf AT 7) G -ra — .t a • PTE PM CATI: OP IIPAEZ H&J!?NN+e,r,CoUTIMP Pea:II TION ON RAYraia) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the acme unto the woad pony,and second parry's Stairs,autzocwrs-In-interest and resigns forever. The true and actual Cotlaldornllon paid for lhla ira utor,stated in Jenne of d011aro,la$104 r i Q C 1.-_._..*However,the Aairal corulderatiun wails of OT includes other property or value glvan or promleed which le C part of the 0 the whale(indicate which)conaiderani:m.00 a untaea!miaow"the sytrholr 0,If ear appitaWe,should bo decd.Sec DRS 93.001 IN WITNESS Wli8RtiOF,the drat party has executed Ihts Instrument:if first party is t eorporatIon,it hoc mood its nano to be Oigned end ft:seal,if any,sff.xed by an akicor or other person duty authorized to do so by order of its board of directors. tH I1t8TA Ol Art O AUP�C T�NFUP D .'`9. ts.Qr:_-j9. n �8ach� ._-_ 11112 IINsropt TWI SIN 6�ALbr,uEO mil INtTF EA1 eE sE,F t. BY; _ S o�Nb�B B � QI� Q �t 1 Ap I(�J►S�F.�7UV,��'16{ANO HFG• AfIIUtA tiflo II 79 TFf1�ET�8PnOrakry_aHOULI)pCHHEECX�4YVP rrii+EEEApPIPRo- �M labAATSSs A�FfCHAEAINORSl30nAW�OWBLTaINveg At1NO ARE! .JlorahI L.]+sc4awzCattYtG7�ParscrtalItepresanlallva STATE LW OREGON,County of_IttlAttiBE:QB. ..)ea. This instrument was aeknowledyed before me on -_•_.... ...--.......— ....--,19 by --� Tile lnstnument was aehntwledged before me en_— .14L— ,19.36.., by ....J tx3.,: r-A,._&achentcftnaer- . ...._.___—.. II ._..PftC1411187.-RA rlr UtaitSt4tista---....-----_•°°---•--____________.____ of..—aZret_F.8Lata_14..E'tavati.1., A,5 Ch hrpAttor. —r--..—.— — ---°-• !irT. % OFFlOIht iftAL .... ...- --...s.1�_�!1_-.15-:_T �.— .--_- ((,�,�;z, KAREN L PAitO Notary Public for Oregon ``'Y �� NOTARY ptlPLyC-0PIEOON My oarrrmlasian expires..._.^5» -y32,--------------- omltinflioN NC•112965 I MY 0OM0,11b40N lxr1Ai1 MAY 27.2002 ‘?Yi r L Cz05-ze,, ee/24--14 PZ / Z -n& 3 _ e4/n /7" g-/- /7 / zz/ ../ -7 /5/ 55A1i Z(i,e Z34 / ii -r7 4O a(717- /2"/ "(-/- 9. 4•• 0/471k,?■(1‘61 alp . (:(/a7 - _ � -/)&di/ 0'7 COet' - ./ . AUG-13-99 SAT 02 :05 P" 92963. 263_ A639_ 437G 57Q0203 P. 02 • TICOR TITLE INSURANCE 1629 SW SALMON PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 • (503) 224-0550 February 24, 1999 DR. WAYNE L. GERIG 15430 SW BOBWHITE CIRCLE BEAVERTON, OREGON 97007 RE: Report No. W687786-TM JOHNSTON to GERIG E 1/2 OF LT 6, BLK 37, TL 1901 TIGARD, OREGON An order for title insurance has been opened under our File No. W687786-TM. If you have any questions regarding the status of the above referenced transaction please contact the title or escrow officer as referenced in the enclosed report. The preliminary title report discloses the current status of record title and other requirements for the issuance of a title policy. Some of the numbered "exceptions to title" may be removed in the process of closing this transaction and will be deleted from the final policy. Charges in connection with the issuance of our title policy will be due upon closing of the transaction referenced above. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with title services. We appreciate your business." Copies of this report have also been sent to: TERRANCE JOHNSTON AUG-13-99 SAT 02 :05 PM 92963. 263. A639. 437G 5790203 P. 03 lye,. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE PRELIMINARY REPORT #W687786-TM Re: JOHNSTON to GER1G • E 1/2 OF LT 6, BLK 37,TL 1901 TIGARD, OREGON STEPHANIE A. BATES - 219-2120 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1505 NE 122ND PORTLAND OR 97230 Questions concerning the closing of this transaction should be directed to your Escrow Officer, STEPHANIE A. BATES, at 219-2120 (FAX.-255-0148).. ******* We are prepared to issue our ALTA 1992 Title Insurance Policy(ies) as follows: Proposed Policy and Liability: ALTA Standard Owner's: $ 117,000.00 Prem. $ 407.50 PREMIUM REDUCED BY SPECIAL SHORT TERM CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $92.50 Lien Search Fee/Government Service Charge: $25.00 Per Tax Lot Our title insurance policy(ies) will insure title to the land described as follows: "e‘r The East one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washing-ton and State of Oregon. TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated SW Mapleleaf Street that inured thereto by Order No. 78-182 recorded January 2, 1979, Fee No. 79000125. Vestee: TERRANCE F. JOHNSTON AND MARY FL JOHNSTON, as tenants by the entirety Dated as of February 11, 1999 at 8:00 a.m. Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, conditions and stipulations which are part of said policy, and to exceptions as shown herein. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE By: Tom McColloch, Senior Title Officer DEB/jeb 1 AUG-13-99 SAT 02 -06 PM 92963. 263. A639. 437G 5790203 P. 04 - • ascertaInea t7y actual surve.y. j T1COR TITLE INSURANCE • • 2 2 >1 i -a0 f 2 EASTY 1 \ saJ6 .- 10 - _ — — — — — — — — 01 iwt' !palm,. 305 110 �1 N 'N O METZOCN 200 064c. • w a U 7... O � 7' P 16 0 " v 96i/2f9 400 302 F = N 701 � ,//4c.R d ,.4 5 ca 1 Pa _ - L 50,19607 S.-6 /140.3... ii S W Li CUST STREET 11 t.4. ''e ` t 1 r 51.10198 '•"en' er o' 1400 (94.18' Fr - 1601 173.27 . 00.• B 0 / ? 78Ar. r 1500 / > o . 1600 o N . M, A t Li 3 . 37.: d `1602 •tll 0 3 u:.1 u :2 190.3 1 1 Z t ° 1 9 0 0 1901 -J I 01 LU i r, 1 1800 C r S ' ;` � J 23....-64 ,, s�P. i O.` t 1P-..-i / 101.3 09 n ; _ 1702 1700 N ` ' hi C.S- 10107 � p m f „ 4, a♦ ... \ E..p cs,r0573.� • 17340 ` . C • ,,,t175440° 0 4o •• i� 1 9 0.5' 1 1 4,1 6' 5 6 1 9 03', VA AT r a30 Ta-132 MAPLE LEAF STREET m ,P 2000 �,a4.1S _ 2100 1903 2200 19oa'.: • A .65 44., ., 2202• VTAL / w ,.. e l23 01 r r. 22 _ � cc T , L ) 3705 ,♦ a 40 a 30 3 9 _ _- ' 2500 S 2400 2300 " e5.30 2303 10. 12 8931 0 =P. gr , __ ry 2400AI M1 >- �. F 4 3 0-,,�,_.._ - o - 2305 ° 3704 ° • ti 79 2 '97) 4' P. A r} 1`' 2304 2302 _ C • 1 S g . • j• ,30 4 Q. a _, 1 ---- °_r:o „- ,. $" .9'f' S _ 6 T9 ie s3:3 o AUG-13-99 SAT 02 :06 PM 92963. 263. A639. 437G 5790203 P. 05 • • TICOR TITLE INSURANCE Report No. W687786-TM Schedule B of the policy(ies) to be issued will contain the following general and special exceptions unless removed prior to issuance: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. a_ Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. b. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. a. Easements, liens, encumbrances, interests or claims thereof which are not shown by the public records. b. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof, 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts'which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 4. a. Unpatented mining claims; _ b. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereat..___ c. Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. 5. Any lien or right to a lien, for services, labor or materials heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 6. 1998-99 taxes $639.94 of which $26.30 is unpaid, plus interest. Tax Acct. No. 271093 1 S 13 5AA-01901, Code 023.81 7. TIGARD City liens, if any affecting said premises. • WE HAVE REQUESTED A SEARCH AND WILL ADVISE IF ANY UNPAID LIENS ARE DISCLOSED. 8. The premises herein described are subject to the easements and the statutory powers,'iicluding the power of assessment, of The Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County. (No unpaid assessments as of the date hereof.) 9. The premises herein described are subject to the easements and the statutory powers, including the power of assessment, of Tualatin Valley.Water District. (No unpaid assessments as of the date hereof.) • 10. Easements for utilities over and across the premises formerly included within the boundaries of SW Mapleleaf, now vacated, as reserved by Vacating Order No. 78-182. 11. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, To: State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division Recorded: February 23, 1987 Fee: 87008864 Records of WASHINGTON County, Oregon. For: slopes, television cables, telephone and electric powerline facilities 12. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, 2 CONTINUED AUG-13-99 SAT 02 :07 PM 92963. 263. A639. 437G 5790203 P. 06 • gi TICOR TITLE INSURANCE Report No. W687786-TM To: The Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Recorded: June 16, 1998 Fee: 98064180 Records of WASHINGTON County, Oregon. For: sanitary sewer Affects: the Southern portion • NOTE: A Real Property Transfer Tax will be imposed at the rate of$1.00 per $1,000.00 or fraction thereof of the selling price based upon the provisions of Washington County Ordinance NOV 289, effective May 3, 1984. • NOTE: A search of the records discloses no judgments of record against the parties herein named as of the date hereof: . Dr. Wayne L. Gerig • • END OF REPORT • • I. • • 3 JIM GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND/BUILDING USE STRATEGIES 1820 S.W. VERMONT STREET SUITE K PORTLAND, OREGON 97219 503 293-0805 FAX 293-2216 Site Development Review and a Type II Variance Application. Applicant: Jim Griffith and Associates. Aldie Howard, Senior Planner 1820 S.W. Vermont Street, Suite K Portland,Oregon 97219 (503)293-0805 FAX(503)293-2216 Owner: Wayne L. Gerig 15430 S.W. Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, Oregon 97007-8225 (Contract Purchaser) Tax Map: 1S 1W 35AA,Lot 1901 Lot Size: 16,965 square feet Zone: CN - Neighborhood Commercial NARRATIVE: This is an application for two things: Site Development Review and a Variance to the front yard setback requirements. The project is located on Hall Boulevard and is shown on Tax Map IS!W35AA as Lot 1901 consisting of approximately 16,965 square feet of vacant land. Note from the Site Plan that the proposed building will cover 31%or the site with parking/paving at 48%and landscaping at 21%; all of which meet or exceed the requirements of the City. As noted in the Pre-application Conference Notes the following Code Sections were to be addressed. Code Section 18.320. Annexations. This property is within the corporate limits of the City of Tigard. Code Section 18.390.040. Type II Procedure. The procedures as outlined have been followed in this application. Code Section 18.520. Commercial Zoning Districts. Property is zoned CN Neighborhood Commercial. In this zone sales-oriented businesses, personal services,repair-oriented businesses and offices are outright permitted uses. We are proposing retail sales and office uses for this building. 1 Code Section 18.705. Access,Egress and Circulation. There will be only one access/egress point at Hall Boulevard. A 15' r.o.w dedication will be required by ODOT along the frontage of the property to allow for future widening of the street. Preliminary contact with ODOT has taken place but they are reluctant to comment until the City has contacted them and discussed various issues as they pertain to development on this parcel. The main topic will be the width of the dedication for future widening of the street but it is anticipated that 15 feet will be required and that is the basis for the variance request in conjunction with Design Review. Code Section 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards. 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements detail the distance from the Centerline of Hall Boulevard in Table 18.730.1 and from the Site Plan we see that indeed,with the additional r.o.w dedication of 15' added to the existing 30' to the centerline we meet the required 45' width requirement. The problem then becomes the setback from the edge of the dedicated r.o.w. to the front of the proposed building which is now shown as 5 feet with 20 feet required. It is this that triggers our request for a Variance to the minimum front yard setback. See Variance Application attached as a part of this narrative. Code Section 18.745. Landscaping and Screening. The Site Plans include a landscaping plan with plant list, an irrigation plan,tree plantings, signage and associated details. A "Tree Preservation Plan/Report"is also included and the Site Plan shows trees to remain and trees to be removed. Code Section 18.755. Solid Waste Storage. As a portion of the Site Plan the solid waste area drawings were reviewed by the local hauler and a letter of approval is included herewith. The contact person for Pride Disposal is Lenny Hing at(503)625-6177. Code Section 18.765. Off-Street Parking and Loading. The Site Plan shows 21 required parking spaces. Code Section 18.780. Signs. The Site Plan indicates the location of the site sign. Code Section 18.790. Tree Removal. The Site Plan shows significant site trees which exist on site and those that will be removed as a result of development. Street trees will be added and trees in the parking areas will be added as shown on the Site Plan. IMPACT STUDY. Tri-Met Bus Service is available less than one block to the north on the main line between Washington Square and the Barbur Boulevard Transfer Station route which makes this site accessible from the entire metropolitan area. Hall Boulevard will eventually be widened which will improve the transportation facility generally. A Bike Lane is in evidence on portions of Hall Boulevard. As a portion of this development a Civil Engineer will design a drainage system that will integrate into what exists along the frontage and this will be in conjunction with the dictates of ODOT. Unified Sewerage District will provide service and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue people will respond 2 to emergencies on site. Tigard will provide water service. This project will not impact the • park system and will not appreciably change the noise associated with Hall Boulevard which will increase automatically as a consequence of metro area growth. This is not a complicated development; one simple office building on a vacant piece of property situated on an arterial developed under the guidelines of the Tigard Development Code. VARIANCE. Code Section 18.370.010 Variances. In this instance the 15 foot r.o.w. dedication along the frontage of Hall Boulevard mandated by ODOT and the City's Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element, cause special and unusual circumstances related to this specific property. In the CN zone the required front yard setback is 20 feet. This request is for a 5 foot front yard setback and obviously the difference is 15' which is exactly what the dedication width will be. Variance Criteria. (a)The proposed variance will not be detrimental ...... The actual street width dedication, which is mandatory for the eventual widening of Hall Boulevard and therefore to serve the larger need of moving traffic efficiently through the area, creates the same difficulty for all property owners along Hall who wish to develop. It is particularly meaningful for those who wish to develop vacant land because the dedication is an outright gift to the State. Developed property must be condemned and a fair market value must be established by a legal process. In this case the dedication is a demand,a condition of development, which forces the property owner to give his land up in exchange for"something"... ... and the theory is that the property will"benefit" from the improvements to Hall Boulevard. This variance will not be detrimental to the purposes of the Code or associated policies because it is the Code and the policies that create the need for the variance. (b)There are special circumstances that exist...... As stated above the special circumstances are evidenced by the need to create a wider street to serve a wider segment of the population in an expanding area. The applicant has no control over his land in this instance because the fact is he will have to dedicate or he will not be allowed to develop his property. (c)The use proposed will be the same.....the uses proposed will be the same as those allowed under the dictates of the Code. (d)Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic..... will not be adversely affected and as a matter of fact will be greatly enhanced by the r.o.w. dedication and future improvement of the arterial. (e)The hardship is not self-imposed...... In this case the hardship is imposed by the City in concert with ODOT. 3 CWalent gam, OM. May 23. 1999 RE: Wayne L. Gcrig O.D. 20/20 Eye Care Professionals Site Development Review Dear Interested Party: [ am Wayne L. Gerig O.D.. the prospective owner of the property described as east 1/2 of lot #6. block 37. Metzger Acre Tracts(lS 135AA-01901), Tigard,OR. I am proposing a site development review at this location for an optometric office. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to invite you to discuss the proposal in more detail with surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: June 8, 1999 11945 SW Pacific Hwy#248 Tigard. OR (20/20 Eye Care Professionals) 6:00 pm Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with y ou. Please call me at 579-0203 if you have any questions, and if you plan to attend. This would help in planning the meeting. Sincerely. Wayne L. Gerig O.D. 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 • FREQUENTLY ASKED City of $and NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING QUESTIONS Comunity Pn'c9 2 terCi um.rrf,. , What Is The Purpose Of This Neighborhood Meeting? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. What Happens After The Neighborhood Meeting? After the neighborhood meeting, the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the City. Sometimes it takes a while before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the City, Staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately 6-8 weeks from the time the application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns. For all types of applications, property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels receive notice of the public hearing (if applicable), notice of the decision, and are given the opportunity to appeal the decision. What If The Proposal Presented At The Neighborhood Meeting Is Not What Is Actually Submitted? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is entirely different, a new neighborhood meeting would be required. In any case, notice of decision is,sent to property owners within 500 feet of the proposed development allowinc them the opportunity to appeal. How Do I Know What Issues Are Valid? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with the Tigard Development Code. Review the development code to familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard City Library or a copy may be purchased at the Community Development Services counter. You may also contact City Planning staff and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. Be prepared, however, that you may not LIKE all the standards, but at least you know what they are. If a development meets the code standards, it can proceed. For your assistance, the Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) has:compiled a-list of helpful,questions to ask that may assist•• �.,. ,. :$ r. .. • you-in determining your_position on a particular proposal.'' The following sheet`lists those questions. i:1curpin\juli::lcitinlo2 do: — i tTk1�ACNEIGHBQRNOOD CONCERN. t :QUESTIONS TO ASK TO MAKE SURE YOUR`CONCERNS ARE MET Tne folla,ving is a list of questions developed by a subgroup of the Citizen Involvement Team. These questions are intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in you': area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests. PROCESS • What applications are you (the developer) applying for? When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it? What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? • Will the decision on the application be made by City Staff, Hearings Officer, Planning Commission or City Council? How long is the process? (timing)/ • At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? • Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard Staff? ✓ Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? ✓ What City Planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the Planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS . Will there be a traffic study done? What are the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? • What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed? What connections to existing streets are proposed? • Are streets proposed to be public or private? What are the proposed street and sidewalK w;dths? • What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requires e its? ZONING AND DENSITY • What is the current zoning? What uses are allowed under this zoning? • Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to what zone? • How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum densItl allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATERQUALITY • What s your erosion control and drainage plan What is the natural slope of the property? What are the grading plans? • Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located? Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING_ • What are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed? • What are the landscaping plans? What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? I — I i rn --I _I I I----- ---1 f��1— — _ _/ / i • CITY of Tl(3ARD STl r / I I nE On II�Rn c I�IOR YAl10M Y1Iyin V — r &i' 1111 + ' --I� >T— I i} F . 1— — I AREA NOTIFIED I r— I ' ,. /negeie -l (500') y J_ l I � R _ { - -IV:" .:Nikki' . L � _ = �F;: - ; _ Wayne Gem is:. b4014 1 I �,N r: 1 Subject w ST ,� e�aMlea>» _ Parcel: n , m un. 'oao ..oen I SUbjeCt Q o site — _I�_ !S 135AA, 01 90 ==1 -s- ..... I LOCI °' ' uri ►la eslea_pi t �A stsgoaao'. . tww ure>fa�awe i i aa-na � O • gI + �H . . 1 No,� w I Q newn • Ell i • I o a 'noe)' `I- --- 1maalmi=- xpal"11" ._ ', NUMMI\ 1 t 1 z . .: „� � amuw r 1� M AP LEL X101°� ' oaaaene• 2 11/066.1412U 6aalanr - _A_ -- - — _J r ___L - la =Q II P1 / I am 1 m / / . . .— apuinw u1eauaPa 3 1•i )�.' RM >�.n at • N, — —J t M 7 — d+ f t' - 1 0�,1 )--rte ' nuae item Zan. 0 100 200 300 Feel �, ,. J i I _ me,i i —___ -- -- s - 1-.25/ , / i • • . —z- - I I — I 4* • , _rown - I 1 i -I f City of Tigard Infnnnaan on Ow mop lR 4 genii/1 Iwllon an//mi :.. • .•.. _I__- I should N vribdwU Um Dw.hpmolrl 4riuc Dai/ial 0 / — PINE ST — I / _ 13125 svr Hall elvd rlg.rc,ON 57223 pi r.) . I (363)630 X111 ' - -- I r-- --I .I ( -- - ---I i^__L._.I - II Au1 M N.4I.11�Rnlnlw Community Development I Plot date_May 3, 1999;C:lnnaglc\MAGIC03.AP1 05/03 '99 12:39 V503 63-! 7297 CITY OF TIGARD C2]002.005 (p9 . / of 4) 1 S 126DD•03100 1 S126DD-90000 •OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION THE METZGER PARK CONDO 521 SW MORRISON STE 725 6959 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND. OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 126DD-90118 1 S 126DD-90123 SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA SALARI MOHSEN 6023 SW ORCHID OR 8978 SW 76TH PL PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1512600-90124 151250D-90220 NADRI KAZEM KEN & SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA 14473 SW 124TH 6023 SW ORCHID DR TIGARD, OR 972.24 PORTLAND,OR 97219 131260D-90225 1S126DD-90226 ARCHITECT TEC N&KIMBERLY S TR CARVER GREGORY A AND 9805 NE SHAVER 10010 SW HALL BLVD#16 MAYWOOD PARK, OR 97220 TIGARD, OR 97223 151260D-90322 1 S126DD-90327 SAYRS FRANK C AND MARY V B PETERSEN JEROME E BOX 108 10010 SW HALL BLVD#17 MORO, OR 97039 TIGARD, OR 97223 1512600-90328 • 1S135AA-00102 ALKEKHIA MAJD METZGER PARK APARTMENTS INC 16139 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 2614 TIGARD,OR 97223 PASADENA,CA 91102 1S135AA-0020C - 1S135AA-00301 JOHANNES KENNETH A/MARGARE1 A HAYZLETT MAXINE TR 10120 SW HALL BLVD STE 134 17015 SW ELDORADO DR PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 is 135AA-00302 • 1 S135AA-00305 r JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN SILLS DONALD N ET AL 12879 SW RIDGEFIELD LN 10115 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 -AA-003' • 1S135AA-00400 JOHAt -.-+ MARTIN&JOAN TURNER STEVEN R 12° - SW - •GEFIELD LN PO BOX 25216 IGARD. OR 9i-23 PORTLAND,OR 97296 1 S 135AA-0040 1 1 S135AA-00500 ROWE SHIRLEY I BRAWAND CHARLES 1027 SW GROVER 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND.OR 97201 CARLTON,OR 97111 ua, UJ, yJ V5U..$ tits 4 7LJ7 1.111 Uk; 11(ARD LJUU3%UU5 (p0, . . f4) J 1 5135AA-00590 1 S135AA-00600 EIDENSCHINK IRMA b BRAWAND CHARLES a 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND,OR 97223 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00700 1 135AA-00701 WES T ON JOSEPH E TIG--D C • OF 2154 NE BROADWAY 131 HALL PORTLAND,OR 97232 'ARD.0- '7223 1S 135AA-00800 1 S 135AA-00503 NASH GORDON 0 AND PENNY J HERBERHOLZ LARRY S &CATHY 0 10231 SW JEFFERSON 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD.OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 15135AA-00804 . 1S135AA-00805 e LAI KHOAN VAN& VO VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01000 MILLS MICHAEL E AND 6 ROWE SHIRLEY I AND WOOD 10211 SW JEFFERSON 1027 SW GROVER TIGARD, CR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S 135AA-01200 1 S 135AA-01400 ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST 7520 SW LANDAU ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARO,OR 97223 • 15135AA-01500 i 1S135AA-01600 VALLASTER GARRY J FRIES PATRICIA S 711 SW ALDER-PENTHOUSE 10225 SW 85TH PORTLAND, OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 e 1 S 135AA-01601 0 15135A&-01602 WASP MATT AND CINDY TAYLOR RICHARD L 10207 SW 85TH AVE 10245 SW 85TH PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 ▪ 1S135AA-01700 1 135AA-01701 SZALVAY LASZLO A.IREN SZA Y ZLO&IREN 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 14550 AZELTREE TER TIGARD, OR 97224 T RD,OR 7224 1S135AA-01702 1S135AA-01800 S VAY LO&IREN CHAVEZ HELEN W 14550 HAZELTREE TER 8407 SW LOCUST ARC, 0 224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 05,03. 99 12: 40 $503 6' 7 297 CITY OF TIGARD (3004.005 1S'35AA-01900 1S135AA-01901 e BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT • JOHNSTON TERRANCE F& 10250 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 1608 PORTLAND,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 • 1S135AA-02000 1 35AA-02100 STAR T S SANDRA LYNN NOR LA OMES INC PC BOX 20007 1534 TH#202 KEIZER, OR 97307 RTLAND, 97201 • 'S135AA-02200 • 1S135AA-02201 NORTHLAND HOMES INC LANDER GENE C&ANNA H 1834 SW 58TH#202 10375 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02202 1 S 135AA-02300 ® HARDING ROBERT B GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON 4130 SW ALICE 6515 SW OAK PORTLAND. OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02202 , 15135AA-02303 LEE CARL M MARKELL KIMBERLY D 8505 SW OAK ST 10405 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02304 1 S 135AA-02305 • ALLEN MARILYN L ' GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND 8525 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD.OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 0 1S135AA-02500 ' CAIN JAMES L LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD 10440 SW 87TH AVE SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97223 . 1 S 135AA-02600 „ 1 S 135AA-02700 PETERSON THEODORE S AND HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 8686 SW OAK 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02801 • 1$135AA-03700 EMMERT TERRY W DEMOULIN STEVE& 11811 SE HWY 212 10455 SW 87TH AVE CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AA-03701 1S135AA-03702 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S CULLINAN RANDY J AND 8605 SW OAK ST 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ri J I.) • 1S135AA-03703 16135AA-03704 BRANDT WALDO G&PEARL E DE MOULIN STEVE& 8835 SW OAK ST 10455 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135A a A-03705 + 15135AA-03707 ROMERO MERCEDES G AND HITCH DORIS 10385 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 35 TIGARD, OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 • 15135AA-03800 15 5AA-90000 LASHAWAY JULIE A DEO••- C • •OMINIUMS 8875 SW OAK OWN - • NITS TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135 AA-90001 1 35AA-9000 • PEI I Y JOHN A HAWL .'•EL M 10301 SW 87TH AVE 905 c' 91 " •VE#7 TIGARD,OR 97223 -ORTLAND,OR - 3 1S135AA-90003 v 1S135AA-90004 SHERWOOD SYDNEY L& CONSER JEAN H AND 10305 SW 87TH AVE 10307 SW 87TH#4 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90005 1S 135AA-90006 LAIRD SHAWN W&LOUISE M TAYLOR.J EDWARD AND 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90007 • 1S135AA-90008 CONNET CARLEE SUE MORGAN DEANNA F 10313 SW 87TH 10315 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90009 - 1S135AA-90010 HAWLEY HAZEL M FLETCHER MARY K 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 16388 SW ESTURARY#101 PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 15135AD-01200 DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 CorAtAtwks }Je-t3My) rS ULLAL S I ri b9N S)4-1 1J ky..e• IkA re ss NO-\ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, (k) ky )LJ - - , being duly sworn, depose and say that on J0. , I 9'i-t, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the'ttached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or n r) 1/-4_ fo bClL ,� ��z�Z3(I f\r- LTft c s ( is t 3s" - O,`Aco) I I -P-0 OP 2c O a copy of which notice so ma`tdd is attachedKereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at T'n isck with postage prepaid thereon. ? ( 5G ._ Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the C� day of , 19_. J OFFICIAL SEAL vDEBY WILUAMS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO 315245 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 10,2002 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: r (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant/Owner: I Address or General Location of Subject Property: [Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): J h:UogintpattyYnasters`attma il.mst / . AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Ilan Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I kIJ i o L-GL Rl q , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed`"C+o z#v i r_ ', 2 affecting the land located at (state the appro)iimate to tion(s) if no address(s), and/or tax lot(s) current) registered) .(�;t tjLO Lcc V lcr-c M�k-EJ<< Ac're_Tkhcks (I 13 ,-AA-Ol9�c) ' ,4n 13 )(-- .36.,•, did on the `I .1' day of M A-1, , 19 `ict personally post notice indicaticiig that the site may be proposed for aS 1 k L4'Vd oc, rwa,,.\- Rzv 1c'A,.> application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at?�• �l C is t 1`,--1N R-Ot9oc�^1 k So,*l\ ec:St- dz brie oA- ProQ�v\1 f(A y,,or; P,1c�A l' I'<_c y) S 1 4 NkO , Me J cri . C') 0 A� evA &Oat S'�' Si J'e.L.t, 1\1 G�� 1�J1 I1 &J4 _ J (state location you posted notice on property) r 1 ` ,: , 91^ -�J(' Ignature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (/t day of I.'L/ l-e -- , 19_. 4 OFFICIAL SEAL / 1 / >4 OEBY WILLIAMS 1- O.)C�`-L-6 i j -' �IOTGRY PUBLIC-OREGON /G � COMMISSION NO 315245 NOTARY PABLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 10.2002 My Commission Expires: J qty -0',)---- (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: I Name of Applicant/Owner: I Address or General Location of Subject Property: LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h 1Jogin\patty1masters\affPost mst - . I _ , A- < . ' ,... . _ Ar ' ' S ■ \ . si Pk Il c..... — 1,. 11 11 ' ; . r . , .0: ' • ...I ,, _%/_-- voilufr-2vr 1 4 . ■ T T".". II . . 4 ( . . I • 1 I 1 h 1 __.1 <. .. _____ ,-.- 4./ 1 ik, , ... .. , ,, -4 _ ..: i . i e4 4 i .. . 1 4:-I 4 „ , , 1 , H . , , , 1 4 I . . ! ,k 4‘, \_,m.... .4 1 . (..) ■ 1 i Hi c\ek- : ! /:„ ---o , , k■40 , • ., .er 4411 - i •44 1 Ap .■111■111■ , . . 411L. AN.1 ' , I Illif I ! \ • \. I I I I I , . .. i , ill% PI .,,'1 1111 millisri . . 1 It 1 h it \ . - . 117r7Q11g,--r I i • „ , Ktodit..-- ' \I __ _ .4m, _ .. _..._ - -- irate-Anic•-66. _ ... ____..... . . . ......._.... • El , _____,„0.„ -±-420zalcv444.7- ro- _,......a,........................................, WPOte icz-tragif0A1,41- i•lc) • A Te Epoi"/ * HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE .Spe_i.31,st: :nt „are an(: pre_ervattor c .tees' 1., CONSULTANTS Dawfc haisreaa Consuura'•f B;; FO Box 1182. Tualatin OR 97062 4 4, Pr,ore 1503)245-1383 .0#t. May 13, 1999 . ♦ _4 ATTN.: Dr. Wayne L. Gerig 20/20 Eye Care Professionals 11945 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 s Reference: Tree Assessment µ 'fa, , Location: Metzger Acre Tracts 4, ,,,,,tilf., Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report le fe ,•`'r, With your approval, I have inspected the site and preliminary site plan (dated 74 ' May 6, 1999) for the Metzger Acre Tracts development project located on the 1;.... west side of SW Hall Boulevard just south of SW Locust Street. The purpose of ,14, the inspection was to determine the health and condition of existing trees on site r- 7: ` and to determine what trees are to be removed per the City of Tigard's "Tree r Plan Requirement". A.: ,, 1 have tagged and numbered, both on site and in this report, all six inch and larger trees in caliper size measured at four feet from ground level. Trees are tagged and numbered using JK92800 through JK92864 series tags in sequential order to easily identify all trees. For the purpose of this report, the trees will be '' identified using the last two digits of the series tags. 4 ' There are a total of sixty-five trees six inches and larger in caliper size at four feet . . i from ground level identified on the attached Tree Survey Plan. Thirty-five of these trees are less than twelve inches in caliper and are not required to be part r of the mitigation. I� I Trees under twelve caliper inches and not required for mitigation are as follows: I 00, 02, 03, 06, 07, 09, 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 4 36, 37, 38, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 48, 55, 57, 58, 59, and 61. Of the remaining trees twelve inches and larger, twenty are classified as hazardous trees and are also not required to be part of the mitigation process. t Page 2 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report The hazardous trees are as follows: 01, 04, 08, 16, 19, 21, 26, 29, 39, 40, 43, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 60, and 62. It is not unusual to find this many hazardous trees on an undeveloped site such as this. These trees are native, growing in an overcrowded situation and have never had any formal care. Most of the hazards come from severe multiple trunks which have formed from breakage caused by winter storms, damage not corrected and the tree left to decay, disease and severe stress. The remaining ten trees twelve inches and larger in caliper size are considered as preservable. The preservable trees are as follows: 05, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 35, 56, 63, and 64. It should be noted that some of the trees that are classified as preservable", might eventually be removed due to the proposed hardscape boundaries and/or project construction; and therefore, will be mitigated as required by the City of Tigard's "Mitigation Plan". A tree protection program for preservable trees that defines standards and methods used to protect trees before, during, and after construction can be found attached to this document and titled Tree Care and Preservation. Page 3 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE SURVEY PLAN Tree Tree Size Tree Number (caliper inches) Species Results 00 11 ponderosa pine Not Mitigated 01 14 ponderosa pine Removal- Hazard Tree 02 9 cedar Not Mitigated 03 11 cedar Not Mitigated 04 14 Douglas-fir Removal- Hazard Tree 05 28 giant sequoia Preservable 06 8 Oregon ash Not Mitigated 07 11 Oregon ash Not Mitigated 08 21 OR bigleaf maple Removal- Hazard Tree 09 7 cedar Not Mitigated 10 28 giant sequoia Preservable 11 20 giant sequoia Preservable 12 27 giant sequoia Preservable 13 48 giant sequoia Preservable 14 32 giant sequoia Preservable 15 8 spruce Not Mitigated 16 21 cherry Removal- Hazard Tree 17 6 cherry Not Mitigated 18 7 cherry Not Mitigated 19 12 cedar Removal - Hazard Tree 20 11 cedar Not Mitigated 21 16 cedar Removal-Hazard Tree 22 9 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 23 7 cedar Not Mitigated 24 11 ponderosa pine Not Mitigated 25 8 balsam fir Not Mitigated 26 12 fir Removal- Hazard Tree 27 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 28 7 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated �'I X701 S Ta ,' 60 f"(vat/91- 6 //3 Page 4 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE SURVEY PLAN Tree Tree Size Tree Number (caliper inches) Species Results 29 14 cherry Removal- Hazard Tree 30 6 cherry Not Mitigated 31 8 cherry Not Mitigated 32 6 cherry Not Mitigated 33 7 cherry Not Mitigated 34 7 cherry Not Mitigated 35 15 Douglas-fir Preservable 36 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 37 10 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 38 7 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 39 14 hawthorn Removal-Hazard Tree 40 12 Douglas-fir Removal-Hazard Tree 41 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 42 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 43 13 ponderosa pine Removal-Hazard Tree 44 10 ponderosa pine Not Mitigated 45 11 cedar Not Mitigated 46 11 cedar Not Mitigated 47 13 cedar Removal-Hazard Tree 48 6 cedar Not Mitigated 49 16 cedar Removal- Hazard Tree 50 17 cedar Removal-Hazard Tree 51 13 ponderosa pine Removal-Hazard Tree 52 24 cherry Removal-Hazard Tree 53 16 Douglas-fir Removal-Hazard Tree 54 20 hawthorn Removal-Hazard Tree 55 10 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 56 15 Douglas-fir Preservable 57 7 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated Page 5 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE SURVEY PLAN Tree Tree Size Tree Number (caliper inches) Species Results 58 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 59 10 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 60 18 cherry Removal- Hazard Tree 61 11 Douglas-fir Not Mitigated 62 40 willow Removal- Hazard Tree 63 15 Oregon ash Preservable 64 40 giant sequoia Preservable Page 6 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION Because of the number of trees to be preserved, the particular situation of where the trees are growing, the species of the tree (s) and the proposed construction plans there will be a certified arborist on site and/or on call for the entire project, especially during any excavating and/or the removal of tree (s). In this way decisions can be made in the field that are only speculations at this writing. MEETINGS: Before the site clearing and construction begins a pre-construction tree preservation conference will be held on site with the general contractor in charge of tree removal, and/or in charge of heavy equipment, the resident certified arboriculturist and those official representatives who have interest in the project. PURPOSE: The purpose of the on site meeting will be to introduce all parties to the specifications and sensitivity needed in the protection and preservation of trees, their environment and protected areas. PREPARATION/FENCING: We have found through several years of tree preservation that the protected area is the first and most important procedure of tree preservation. If the fencing is placed properly and maintained the root zone of the tree (s) within this protected area will not be compacted nor damaged by needless excavation. Before any site clearing takes place tree fencing needs to be erected out to the drip line (furthest most branches) of those tree/s to be preserved. Tree barrier fencing can be as simple as a seven (7) foot tall steel fence stakes driven into the ground approximately two (2) feet, 6 foot apart and the tree barrier fencing attached to the stakes. Page 7 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION PREPARATION/FENCING: It is further recommended that two (2) heavy gage wires be attached to each stake. One (1) at the top of each stake and interwoven through the fencing and a second(2) wire attached to the stakes approximately 2 feet above ground and interwoven through the fencing. In some cases the fencing, will need to be adjusted from the drip line to a smaller area in order to accommodate walls, building, sidewalks, excavation and other like building construction. The adjustment of the fencing and any disturbance within the protected area will be done under the supervision of the consulting arborist. If the fencing is adjusted to a smaller diameter it may be necessary to erect a chain link and/or a heavy plywood fence in order to protect the adjusted area. Regardless, any adjustment of the fencing from the drip line, no matter how slight, will require therapeutic care for the tree and it's root zone. REMOVALS: Those trees that are structurally unsound and/or unhealthy whether they be in the construction area or in the preservation areas will need to be removed for the safety of person, property and to the surrounding trees as well. Tree removal will be done in such a way so as not to damage the those tree/s and their root zone which is marked for preservation. Removal of these tree/s may require climbing the tree/s and taking them down in small pieces. Stumps of the removed tree/s which are less than 20 feet from a preserved tree will be ground out by using a stump grinder. Page 8 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION THERAPEUTIC CARE: Therapeutic care is described as that treatment which will be needed to insure the tree/s within the protected area receive the best chances for survival. In order to accomplish this feat the tree/s will have to be periodically inspected during the construction process and periodically for at least two years after construction is completed. individual treatment is based on the tree/s needs, it's root zone, structural condition and health. Factors will be taken into consideration, such as species, soil compaction, soil annals, season in which construction is done, how much root zone will be affected by construction, losses of surrounding native plantings and loss of and/or over abundance of sub-surface and surface water. ROOT PRUNING: Excavation when possible will be done towards the tree rather than along side of the tree. Further, before excavation begins bridging and tunneling will be considered especially if tree root/s are found to be in excess of 4 inches in diameter. When excavation needs to be done within the drip line of the tree it may be necessary to cut roots. All roots 2 inches and larger will be cut clean with the use of an ax, saw and or other like sharp instrument. Regardless, any work within the drip line of the tree will be done under the supervision of the consulting arborist. FERTILIZING: If the tree/s diameter root zone is reduced the tree/s will need to be therapeutically fertilized. How much and mixtures will be determined by the amount of disturbance, root loss, soil analysis, condition of the soil, season, health and condition of the tree/s. Page 9 May 13, 1999 Reference: Tree Assessment Location.' Metzger Acre Tracts Subject: Tree Preservation Plan/Report TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION Those tree/s which will be less than 8 feet from the tree at ground level may require not only therapeutic fertilizer, but root hormones as well. This will help the sealing process of damaged roots and the stimulation of new growth. When a tree root area is severely damaged it may need additional fertilizing within 6 months and again within a year. ACCIDENTS: With the amount of activity on a major development project accidents are bound to happen. Limbs are broken, root are dug up or the root zone are compacted. In most cases if these problems are addressed immediately by the resident arborist they will not hamper the trees longevity. Where negligence occurs and the contractor deliberately damages a tree and/or the root zone the contractor should be held responsible and monetary values arrived at for the repair and or replacement of the tree/s. If I can be of further assistance and/or if more information is needed please contact me immediately. Sincerely, j IL Philip C. Mickey BS MS Assisted: David Halstead BS CA ASCA N$9'42 Q E N 97.04' I I I - I I -1---,.---.-.7 "....4.,, tltl 0 Iris J C�lJI ,.wr lirp% - ir '---..5 ' 4 ..„, , .... t 0`(, 3 ioc;`o�I , d ' I n \ + h.wwF '+ 2-. ZY = i ■ 1. EL V. ■ ® 171.9 ? � _ ""� yyy I 11YMM y � rrlw� r y 4 1 • . sr) 1�- _.�` �v ``� M \ . . \ I sr) 1J • We`.1 1- 141 "'T '.. ti= , 1 i I ' j %''r te ' ` 'n .re' 47 a ?`',v '4 n.{ 4 11• I ' i ► (j) 1 - 0 _ J Z .1 o) TRAFFIC SI - BOX •1 Cm I k n � � co 1 o ice ; Csi , 31 N j4 v in I ff , Ol '1 p O c TL 1901 , ,�0�-19�°�°'' -01-1,-:.- . ., ! ! { i sE N ....- . -, -: A-,:--s. : a • Nil�` __4 4q 6 I. I ■ ■ ,, d -:. ;r114941,.51, 51,414: 1.,.,c s .2. r, I. "' -,""ran,...^,,,,;/ ".. ; %, c 71/ 1 . c afv: .: FOUND 5/8" IR W/RPC STAMPED "CENTERLINE CONCEPTS INC" a_t ! j I FOUND 5/8" IR C STAMPED' 0 I �, i j -CENTERLINF�J PTS INC" �/� J��` j �, �/ �• -589'4 `r r • 97.11 w • 9` SS- \A/Ar CakuIaho1S [ OWELL l NgOl1VNEQONg DE @Q§Rfj DfikfiDo PO45 S.E. 102nd RTLAND, OR. 97216 CIVIL — STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PH: (503) 254-6292 FAX: (503) 254-6761 September 13, 1999 City of Tigard Re: Office Building Dr. Wayne Gerig S. W. Hall Blvd. Preliminary storm analysis for the above project has been run on the King County rainfall distribution program for a 25 year, 24 hour storm. Pre development runoff is .29 cfs Post development runoff is .46 cfs Storage volume computes to 208 cf. (Probably design for 500 sf storage.) Calculations attached. Sincerely, 0_1)P�� � �GIIV �e��� Payton Rowell, PE Cj'V F. 1:),0‘.° t2 ,31 Vo IbW Sc 16.g6bi' ' ImiDSG = 2%t%= 3,7674 irtieek x Taro- i4(131 k'v-- o "4 l ti t 11 = ")/0 v‘ N:,:„.;.,-4 6,5 -v t o-o n" 'moo ,i- < / I _. ' ( . k � m 1 •� r ir , . .., •! r _______ 1---- li ., .i, fI t',, .A k_•k )I,J r-t V ,,- ., • . .\ , . , , , . II 5J / 1 x\ ( ] !� 1 - L 0 r ii ......_,..., • ,1/4, -_. ,...__ \ . (.1) ii 1 -. ! - . t. \ ...___.e . . I ..Z \ - ---, 1 - ...1 ,�.. ` 1 -_--- - -- - 1,0„ . . . • ... . I 'i r -_ r�� NO./4 (,)?4,, ' , ,. r k-,1-v- -,•rI.-•• - -2b ,0 i lr �.Q,) i' t . . . ... . I . • 1 . 0'10 . . . . , . , . „ , , . 1 , 10111APIII iiirilitAllifti■-■ .r.%• - 1 1 - • i ., '. ri.,. s.„-k*_-.--.v.:;....4 9"4 I — -——■11111t M117,tNialrfirai0 r, , ,, .., , • :,--- r ,,,,,,v,„A.,t. ....,, .. , , , ...„,„, , I /\, A , &,4.0,,;6:.04;4114,4170,411,1‘34 ■.: 1 , ' Ai . / 1 1.,I' I ii 4 iik_ . lip' 140114i0v4iiii+, . • •,.. .1.24., t. . 4.: , .97.i , . \\.\•\.:lee; ' .4 p dx ... i i ,". i a" • -4., Op.. V A icit,,, . ., . , _ . s-,.4 \ ‘tts6 , "------..,:- _ ----'-- •. ,li . ,,,, 1 1 , ,/ , -- . Ipt p 7 N .'" ' 2"' -"--F-----''''W . ' 1 ' . 40 - 1/, , <0,ott ---g-y-zi 1, -i._ ,, / . , or i.'''41%.: • -"AN.; 4',.■• .4p , che'„.4 lin,.;.:4-4 i, , JO' i 40' .: r . 3014 T--> S.V7) l 4 '110 V''. ,.6-... 1,1,, , , . ' ---. lid , , -...--7.. . ......- "„' ..4 (',..,4', )...__,._ li l'.,.I '',. : °IN: i . ---' „ ,, ,, 1 ," '\ / . ..--__ . - , .' 'co M. I . if -. 1s: '\<7 " / ,/ ' TRAFT7C 90VAL BOX ' 1,-. • . , 1K• ,", r"Z . , iz.\ / ,• ., I z th, lig i , x \;42 7L DO/ .. .. 1 A i \. :74. / \,>) -- -. .-- \ ,,,e,. .. , / i . : .. a %0 gPio. 1: ''' .'' ) , ..- • Ex,s, /— snw 0 .''</g .,,'SV ' -..0 , • •- __ ,I.00 , . ! '- 1 L , J, il..... --- A 1 i. 1 - .t ri • , . ( \ . \-, _ - , i i • . ' * - \ I . • '.. _ \<• • ---. \ i , , , 4, ,. ...-- 41.1, ,,..: .,, , - Az. ,- 1 i i ' 441111117. . .1.6.?...„i 1 0 ' •iwillill 4 i[. 141ZNI 1 ' IP? 1 F°umPct-5tidER77vE c.4•c,sPrisAlre I' I I ....4:` 4.— ill' 114 , . ' •t i 1 '..,, , . MAPLE., 1/ i / ..-(c\ . , \ . ' FOUND 5>T1177,10,44PC STRAPED' VENT/I'M CEP TS INC i - 1; .. ,,, ..,;.„. . I ,-- .. , ......_, . . _ _ . I' 'i .-- ' , _sairzt Revi-="1117'—— , ss—.-=' -r-'-''.- --•I ss . .... . , • • __ ,.,_ rib . . •• . , ,• , ----e -.. - . , 1 , . . . , , C /58 70'-///r i t HII I ''' 'Et!'i'' ''''''. . 1 GRAPH/C SCALE 1 L SPECIFY: R 7 48 . 0 368 270 1 . 70 . 27 8 35. 6 319 250 1 . 77 . 27 9 27 . 6 284 237 1 .83 . 28 10 22. 4 261 228 1 .88 . 28 11 19 . 0 245 222 1 .91 . 28 12 16.8 233 218 1 . 94 . 29 13 15. 3 226 215 1 . 96 . 29 14 14 . 3 220 213 1 . 97 . 29 15 13. 6 217 211 1 . 98 . 29 16 13. 1 214 210 1 .98 . 29 17 12 .8 212 209 1 .99 . 29 18 12. 5 211 209 1 .99 . 29 19 12. 4 210 208 1 .99 . 29 20 12 . 2 209 208 2. 00 . 29 21 12 . 2 209 208 2. 00 . 29 22 12 . 1 208 208 2.00 . 29 23 12 . 1 208 208 2 . 00 . 29 24 12 . 0 208 208 2. 00 . 29 25 12 .0 208 208 2. 00 . 29 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .46 . 29 .29 2 . 00 208 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - s ' SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES) 25, 24 ,4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO.. .1 . 4 ,86,0 , 0 ,4 DATA PRINT-OUT: 1212-. ' ' PVVE1..0 1lar\1 AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 86. 0 . 0 . 0 4 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 29 7. 67 3698 EN ' d: ] [p. h] filename[ .ext ] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 ' S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES) 25 , 24 , 4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 , 0 , .4 ,98 , 3 rin5T- p -of DATA PRINT-OUT: M1 f AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 0 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 3 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 46 7.67 5468 ENTER-Td I[path] filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES) 25 , 24 , 4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 ,0 , .4 ,98 , 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 . 0 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 3 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOI.(CU-FT) ENTER Ed : ] [path] filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: . SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES) 25 , 24 ,4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 , 0 , . 4 , 98 , 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 . 0 . 0 . 4 98 .0 3. 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 46 7. 67 5468 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename[ .ext ] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES) 25, 24 , 4 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 4 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 , 0 , . 4 , 98 , 3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 4 . 0 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 3 . 0 • , Fc t._n-tiJA9 s1-041 u 0-E 1J N s cAVE. z 3767 4i = . b'�k c 4,AKw! C i 3 t� 4 = .30 kc 5cc AfcAs = ( b.c( EGC L .3 lac � L9C D.162.)_ 0. is (0 \IV, 5"\o(c4, ..■ .?..11/4krk 61,ktil 2sik • (Ress .3 03 ') 3,2 .84 cF5 (;2 25 = •3c) 613 ; 3,W - ,ct7 CFr5 - STDPti�. .84- ►32 _ . 5a ctr S ( .0 `� = l8 2 CFI Ors tavtL-C QaT1o1! ?•4_A r.s x Zo X 2' AVE = 'OOO CAt-1 ■35E 10' 244 VRE 3.14 ( '.(Ly 70 ZZD c- ROWELL ENGINEERING & DESIGN By Date Project Sheet of PR,E - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OFTICARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Community� evefo ment CITT or IMAM oACMON P [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(6)Months) ShapingA Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 41/1- ) 9 qJ STAFF AT PRE-APP.. 32, 1 1 4"-- ev... I' APPLICANT: -vVA-V tk.)e 6-€--,¢„I (r AGENT: Phone:[ ] 5 1-q -- o )-O 3 Phone: I l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: TAX RAPES]/LOT#[S1: j -; ; 3 S` A A Q/ 90 / NECESSARY APPLICATION[SJ: s r Tt O o ue-L OPm eA.) r- u E-tc) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 0_0N s T-te ,mac_T 41 /5-0 s P 8 i - 0/4)6- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: c A k 4.0•2 �10 e_tom le CA e4 c i ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C.I.T.AREA: o i 1 tr.). I FACILITATOR: PHONE: [503] ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: t sq. ft. Average lot width: 60 ft. Maximum building height: 3 S ft. Setbacks:> Front 0 ft. Side'22 ft. Rear 9r2-c ft. Corner 2 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: eC % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: '5- %. [Refer to Code Section 18. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/� TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1IA times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1019 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS STREETS: '/ feet from the centerline of f-+ AA-L . `v iT • ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.) 4/ coS. PA IL..p 1^i I✓ Pa c tv' Zzy, a PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: .3 .4/10 o o(10 — S• I //0(.9 i (2.2 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 1St 1 4- SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: • Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parking: - All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. , 3/, cv. x '1. i 5 a - -1°' --- --z- Minimum number of accesses: 1 Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: y All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential AppllcaUon/Planning Division Section WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS—SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIA INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading spa . The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0801 �\ CLEAR VISION AREA The city requires at CLEAR VISION ARE, BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT ($),FE HEIGHT at'road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Referlo Code Chapter 18.795) DIFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. / i. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN AD TION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING �) .- - TREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Manning Division Section SIGNS - SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR NDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter)75 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.040C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include speci 'recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.0§9:C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44' LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any/Case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY, BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path i paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section - WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetates corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP ENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, suc s a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall no e a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisi 9 ns of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "signifcant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubiC feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS)/AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). • The standard TUALATIN RIVER IPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIPjtN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.030) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning OMstoo Sectlon Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: • Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been renoved from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; • That vegetation was n6t removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native pl t species; • That there will be infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slo e of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.197.100) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREEPAN_FOR Tk1E PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: b Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential AppllcaUen/Nanelap Division Section • MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.E.) NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32) CODE CHAPTERS ,F)3 18.330 ✓ 18.390 18.520 18.715 !1 18.765 18.795 18.350 _ 18.420 18.530 18.730 _ 18.775 18.797 _ 18.360 _ 18.430 18.620 18.745 ✓ 18.780 18.800 1&.370 18.510 18.705 18.755 ✓ 18.790 IMPACT STUDY As a part o the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-ResIdential AppllcaUon/Plannlnp Division Section . NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION • PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 BUILDING PERMITS —__PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: NEED - T . n—e. PQV ur 0 E 1N •0 46 _ t ..11 -6 6- L e4-ri,06- r)--1/1 L BO XL "Jo— 14%1 /A-1 C_t�A,)• 4%!U n)c- 677-F-12 tl 6 u -7-9 CA)E5-r p,2 F 'i 17 R P7.5 P T72.-tom�E MOJ.A L o1 ,pJ $r c- Ir?iC I A.50— rt-c'L) u i ( c PA-a -K-4 rU G- tea- F L)T J&R-r J r c &E A-Op vk S c FD ? ,�I a=�`b S 6A-c.4 F -c.v cp -rro S• J ri* •r+)% ' ■ rr-i ti,. 1 1 1-vaK r IGc Mo f►r VI t:0 ■ OF. u. •,,)+J. 1.-1 2-S-0 ✓F 4%) 1 - - A V )v* s r. x r- 1--r"1--r" l l s e 5-1/4.42-LO -- a� h a.-mac p G CL r0-i—fo n, (..._c7 P t, x a-u ' u.r,_A or✓. ,IC 6 CITY OFTIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 019 HON-Residentlal Application/Planning Division Section PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard t-F Di✓F cc r2 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of ood site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failures the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: c�- CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4171 FAX: 503 684-7297 E-MAIL: staf s first name)@ ci.tigard.or.us is\cu rpin\masters\revised\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: `3) M t c-t1G.c Date: 4/1.3! 7 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pie-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): © Vicinity Map 0 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map CI Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map 0 Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan 0 Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan I ' Site Development Plan 0 Architectural Drawings 5 Landscape Plan © Sign Drawings Er Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND ■.cPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10120/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map c/Y eli,e-L p1aJ Showing the location of the site in relation to: cz.d.j re A Lc $4Q ft Gt • Adjacent properties i r4-t rma_ticrn- ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all sOuctures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The propos lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes they than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into, 'narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries Cl Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension pla showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan Jam" The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and tir orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ra ios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plate profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to Save-existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining.standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist-doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 w` f gri- 1 • 0 1. r o IISIIIII0'.... :--. ..... :. ' r s 11J111!"H„,,,, ' ''' ''',! !'t''i'' ,''':, .:i.......:,:4 ...vjiiiiH, ,.-, . , ,... ' ' . ' . ' -.... ..7..'' ' Ittc .,,,,,;„„:„.... ...,.. ..„,. I if t .• ...•• . . ••• ....:-.. ' . ''''. '.... ' .... ' - ' . ......: ..:.',:;'1• •'4,....,!. k • xe Y ,,. .. _. _. ,: . flr. y F-','''`''4' ' ' ''' w �v 7,,,,,,:i„..:7...,,:..., , , „, ..,., m ,,;.:..:"....'... .,, ..'..:"..3 '� i AY . a ' "Illh*iji:lahi:l,•:••;:l7'..4,fitt-,' S Mir. t r: ;lit. t ST , i _ 1. ETZGER P ST 7 UP '''.' ________________ / III in a UP di ,.. ' I wGUST r- fn f, o n -.J - m W ,.. ., ::•.....Aillig , 1 R- 12 _,,,x,„:,,,,,, .„...., ___,".- -_ .., -------mApLELEAF_ ..,,...... ____________ll , 1 - .:. 7 • .� i 1 i _ _ 41 - r arkw- OAK 406 ., , ....... \ \\NN.N...w...- p411;NE s \ \ -. % T P1 E II r II G'—tS *Lc_ Al ,,„5 T cm k b ; k_e- re-uz-c / S /3 S AA 6/ ?a/ S--1 v k, ) 1 y Q r.LeAA a.�. 13 /Sik ,,, PE MA 0—N\ Gam ^ - mm r Cr • •..." "."1: mom' Su a Creek S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »i 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 :: 25 26 27 28 29 30 8:00 8:30 Vilayne Vie... x: ?` = Planning 9:00 Revise Roh ::;,..<' >> < Contact Dick B. 9:30 = > 10:00 0 10:30 ><'>:..:...:..<:::.....: 11:00 : > > 11:30 ..,..... 12:00 12:30 1:00 ... 1:30 a !wF�1� ...:��`��i::fi::�Sr:'•:•:R'tt•`:.::>.'•::#:?:?+. :::isy';;%�.`Gasis� i3iiii;iiiii�ii�i�i ;:�;:�>:�;:�i:�;:�;:�;:�;:�;;:�:�>:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�i:�:�:i 2:30 3 ........................... 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 4:06PM Monday,April 12, 1999 • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Co Onty(Development D S(raping f Better Community S I 5S AA PUBLIC FACILITIES At (`t.0 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (✓) ('-✓V to 4 feet from centerline. (j — a pikmac.5 ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( , street improvements v iti be necessary along v,/ �� - CD`Ts), to include: ❑ _feet of pavement Li concrete curb LJ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Englneertng Department Section ( ) — stree' Drovements will be necessary alor to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2 ) (4 Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section are on the opposite ; of the street from the site. If the ■n-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW f-' - NA/D. . Prior to �e.49,a^i4 , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee nil-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(*) (_JS� 'IQ 4 - aline which is located it.) HAL,- VT?. 144 F . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to cc _rztn>,A—r �.! U ,4 Air ""t" S3i2 - "rrt►S Srt-. Water Supply: The WA?'oe_ ST - Phone:(503) -771 provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section • newly created impervious sr ;es. The resolution contains a pr.( on that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: (✓r Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 11YY�, � I f I.L._ Imo ! l/I R 4� Co,17Qc7 �4n.� t'�i rv� e �Y - Soa2 x Foe._ ,4tS/S7.4 . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIE is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. • A t��^- -�-✓�. l MRz47■P r5 Fad— fl f c-€cpTS) • CIF= J �qQ1 Tt D to Ac w..y.�7 f Ti-r fALitSt P-e uS i RaPC c� PERMITS 1 •- -+'i►.i(.i. Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to i main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • In addition, the perry e will be required to post a boric' similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all ,, y grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be � submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 016 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FO( BDIVISIONS. All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. lai PREPARED BY: F>-1-+CT). 1 `/ 0711 ENGINEERING DEPAR ENT STAFF Phone: 15031639-4111 Fax: [5031684-7291 h\patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section preapp-r mst) 04 March 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, W KY E L - '�R� , do affirm that I am (represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed Oft �U ( (Site yy f Qtvte03)affecting the land P P �`'� U�e 9 located at (state the approximate Iocat n(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) ll 7-S S.W • tAAt1 al Oa- T U A R D OR-e�c� Oi , and did on the kftH day of 19 SI pprsonaily post noti a indicating that the site may be proposed for aC4ice Q ty'' Opm-0r-ksk-o(C.ke S dt.bt w(Pevte4,4application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood' meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 114-4 S S. /1 t( 1 1 3 N't t (A. , ( EAS�- S " og- 1 4 N 1 o ' -pa►�• lAhtl t\id. w. -111-a. C,3„, v.- 10-k- Z * S] tl t o Q 'J t w: C p l e q.r- V\ew - i J */5 i iA I k (state location you posted notice on property)IP(k)a 1 6-11 Si na�re (In the prEksence Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 6 day of v..J c , 19 5( OFFICIAL SEAL f, f : .,, THERESA A.BROPHY r NOTARY 1 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON (? r COMMISSION NO.043823 r My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 14.1999 pplicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) -1,ME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 2.4'. t C ' I it TYPE OF PROPOSED DF•V,ELOPMENT:• 'iI'+ Jr�..'t '�iR�Z��ii�! Name of Applicant/Owner: W Ny IJ E - C fZA C7. ► , I I Address or General Location of Subject Property: ,U I I�3 S S. ��A a Ise)'J • mil. hn") 0 L O1�:23 V I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): S 13 J) A ' 01 S O b h:$ownlpattylmasters+attpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) • {\\ L _ 0 I, W !J � fzA , being duly sworn, depose and say that on ..)(kveA. , 1991 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) S.W • IA A L( V id . Hj Net Ok -v 97 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at i rrt-.o J o R.e 13 O v� with postage prepai ereon. (X)Sig tune (In th presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 5 day of n e , 19`f �: titi1ti1�1ti .1tititi1ti11��ti�r �►' z�' OFFICIAL SEAL } 2 r."' THERESA A.BROPHY 1 j1 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �' �� COMMISSION NO.043823 f MY EXPIRES MAY 14,1 ese NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 'NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME- ire^f s o g L . ) - TYPE OF PROPOSED D LOPMENT: MIN EEPrMi A• )14...t-Y% Name of Applicant/Owner: ' U 6 L- tusumnp Address or General Location of Subject Property: 4 la . I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I S ( 3S" 1 f'i s0 C) n:Uoginlpatty4nasterslaMmat mst ./ - 1b • . /Vp„ \ \„,)/ 1 I 4 OA Ar1)\g2..1 -;--Ni OW Wtiv3 wtAleo,N ip- 'D 9 C1 u.k \--e-4 br_Arv,.. w A-s Loy„ y \SSe s s yy.Q.J7 (,-,..,A VP\xA b .NrANIN,c-(2 Nqxzw ‘31, f\Apyk). _ f'fV . \ D-S- Ea riA fir. o U10 i3 0 � 61A45-1--t) (_. o z cno � T ri.{co , oZ., 97 8l , lbt 1 $ 0o Cl5 t 3S A-)/loil` 10-\--- - \ boo C \ ; \ 3S- DAY I -t -t t joo N . P(--o Qsi fi;c,s LLL ) _3- a s- sew, C C- e a —� v,s1- ‘Y ; 40 (--k-ki\--y.4 oz., 1 __-)._ - Ly (-00 -"-i'{'1 t- 1%1 i' . -x-e_ri•-\ �- K , k o �Av, 1 bi 3 Soul C 3s bps)/14-A\lgol 1ZA-v.e.-6b.,e__ N wA-■I ,°\b-1-y l k-F- 10o (1st 3s- Db) QQt,, nnP 'r e.,,,,• p, 0. SAN Psti a.P\w,A I S 1 s S.0v. R L Cal \)Q J e V_ , tPINR..k2r`. CLAAS -R e. 1 l 0,1 A-R-p J Q5�, i�--2Z3 ( 10 Sul L-,, m 1 T f °aQ W-1N-�. tAki FtJ2 rk l o . '3 0 3 C \ S \ 17�� 114*1400 3 a o s w. rn NC A bA,n. . . po 4t �,,,A o 9-}--3-01 loo`. calS) J IA, p19,2loc--k_- 100 33 0o L l s I 3S bb) . 1Z3 `lf SW S I' f\v-L ' _02 ;P r -�--1 , 0Y?-- cVi--�--)--1 1,.rvrn S oh, yv Orr MZ c 1C' 0:1\3 Caw .10*-4k 1 (000 C\ 1 3S bb) I >s to Sw Lo-p,; Ap, P\N,- i . -3 l o , o R, c0--)-3-3 S v\-a. 0,2 3- l l v to{-1\ lo (. l s ) 3 5 b-) 1 a--- 1 S Sw, 33 rd t\v-z.. Yo r- -l p-KA O I ��-�l°t A 4 c-Iot zMc_,z, i-k( bc r 4,o1Z 1 bk- 1(0 0 1 (I 1 3s b /lot ►3oo ckc0 3-0 S.w. 90- k j . K w-Aair Civuz, L e-0\:( IN 1^N-eii• CA,t2^(1:41-0-* 1 c+ °- t 1 3 1 I V'D ) .C10 D4ZA)o-Y\ l'xCRot,, LLC. 1 R-- 7 -e. Loop 4 '4 (0 , SM1-e 1 51 . S Y\ '0., 7 e- \S .P1-1-1- LUi-4NO1 ( 1S13s-DP,) i OQ __% k 5i -) L1 -- -t-° 1 gsoL6z-O sv\ivv. --2r \A-1-3, ‘d . SQZ ' / ti _ eV) ) -?Ji\fc) , (QgsS tS1 ) a5110--1 -(--C--L- ) X2.10 'CPA' C\ 1 -z-C,--L,10 210 C v 21 Vl 11_ f V''4--e g 'f'S QSC f1 ' ?)-1V -vA- � ,\ cri ‘M"c 011) 1t \-A\g/NAA__Ao -6-AS ce■ oiN4ocItooi AiW r,0 yvv‘oci i -c--,.,-tZ Z10 G- c/1- \1 (Qq _ss 1 S \ ) _m tt r+C1 -D?-)4Y �"' )01S. 'cf'C -C. 1 $ E-,--c -EA, 210 (o?l ZN 1_ i,-a (, - ..d& VA-1 9-1 seej S 0 fi i) I I 0 AdnNem \c,N\frno-i 8""`,9 o D -j-P^o' 4110 c-() Q1 s 1 (Qq-SS, t S l ) 6) /:i, 4-01 \AQ\vW --)\ N f -c Eb --z)0 ` oPdd C11 )ri\V \4i- ■ o--7 'c1'C off. I f .,--,,--,-, _EL ""Z..0 r Oro:VC1i_ r- 'I)n '1\r;1 1 kJ /\ ' Q S. 1-)L 5��� IQ\ oL j ( Q__ . 1 1 ) -k-° --) c.-c--,,tb c0 (-C)v d [1 L \--1-) it-S\19 )c S,LI `loco a 1 --)-014 v± ,\m() - 'rq'C --.( 1 I .q. . v I _\(\\kNiv,k ocz). 1,0■1_ 30 )75 W-e';‘ (-A-1 V tiA,.- vw (vQ, S _. I. S 1 ) oci� 15-�a-1 (QQ._ss \ \ ) Z1 #4.01 to-c-t�- ,,, 230 pJ '-y 1 -J Q01 �-E.-et b 2i0 C a 1C1 '-)q ��v '.,\ 'M- ∎0, \-, u,,o-1 ' MS o J11 Y1 4\ f\& ) l VIA \ 15s/W 4110• , . . I ' ' / CITY of TIGARD STGEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM `- -- - - AREA NOTIFIED i ( , — 7/1 (S00') Am- r � 181290090220 Wayne Gerrig 2 15735000301 151289090113 101180003100 101260090226 i k 10135000102 1 - 1013 500 00390 w Subject I j ' 10135000305 10135000200 i —-.'""'_-- 1S135*90070Y iS1i5AA00702 Q Parcel: I S 13 SAA, 01901 151350 161x50 00803 161x500400 [site 10135000804 O ____ _.. LOCH, 15135000805 0135000800 03175081681 i� iS1i5000500 15135001400 I M135000800 f 15735001500 1135001608 " 15135000800 W� - l 'T ," W __.- _ -_. 1135001602 ST --- t I ` ` 181350001701 001 151350011 ` 1 15735001000 10135000590 , ' — __10135001800 ' 1 - 15135082702 t. 13135081010 - - 1505090000 MAPLEL 1513 50 9 0 0 0 8 r 151x5000401 10135090007131350090003 ± - 15135AAMI915135090005 1S735001Y00 13135001701 15135090010 15135090001 15135002000 15135002100 15135002200 2i 1 _�,I r I- ' 1S135AAOti9( 2 1505003707 15135003705 r" V) 1 _-- 30135003700 I 10135002300 € 1317 50 0 2 3 03 17:64;:>," ._ 10135003000 15135003704 15735002400 I 11a500lM4,� • 15135003701 -J „ '`r� 35002301 101350E13713 [ N 151a500a70Y ST OAK -- - - -- - OA, �' 13135002801 ' 0 100 200 300 Feet II, 10135002800 � . --_ � /313500Y7110 - _ _ 6 1"=252 feet ' 1 A -_ 1673541101200 IiL IE I— City of Tigard * Information on this map is for general location only and _ l _ should be verified With the Development Services Division. -- 1t-'—I I E ST 13125 SW Hall Blvd �+ - - • E Tigard,OR 97223 ,_ -, - (503)639-4171 http/ANww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: May 3, 1999; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • (p9 , 1 of 4) 1 S 126D D-03100 1 S 126DD-90000 OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION THE METZGER PARK CONDO 621 SW MORRISON STE 725 8959 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S126DD-90118 1S126DD-90123 SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA SALARI MOHSEN 6023 SW ORCHID DR 8978 SW 76TH PL PORTLAND, OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DD-90124 1S126DD-90220 NADRI KAZEM KEN& SHMULEVSKY MARK&MARGARITA 14473 SW 134TH 6023 SW ORCHID DR TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S126DD-90225 1S126DD-90226 ARCHITECT TED N&KIMBERLY S TR CARVER GREGORY A AND 9805 NE SHAVER 10010 SW HALL BLVD#16 MAYWOOD PARK,OR 97220 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DD-90322 1 S 126DD-90327 SAYRS FRANK C AND MARY V B PETERSEN JEROME E BOX 108 10010 SW HALL BLVD#17 MORO,OR 97039 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DD-90328 1S135AA-00102 ALKEKHIA MAJD METZGER PARK APARTMENTS INC 16139 SW ROSHAK RD PO BOX 2614 TIGARD,OR 97223 PASADENA,CA 91102 1S135AA-00200 1S135AA-00301 JOHANNES KENNETH A/MARGARET A HAYZLETT MAXINE TR 10120 SW HALL BLVD STE 104 17015 SW ELDORADO DR PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-00302 1S135AA-00305 JOHANSSON MARTIN&JOAN SILLS DONALD N ET AL 12879 SW RIDGEFIELD LN 10115 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 AA-00390 1S135AA-00400 JOHAN' -i MARTIN&JOAN TURNER STEVEN R 12; • SW ' ■GEFIELD LN PO BOX 25216 IGARD,OR 9 •23 PORTLAND,OR 97298 1S135AA-00401 1S135AA-00500 ROWE SHIRLEY I BRAWAND CHARLES 1027 SW GROVER 10125 NW RIVEN WOOD PORTLAND,OR 97201 CARLTON,OR 97111 (pa . i24) 1S135AA-00590 1S135AA-00600 EIDENSCHINK IRMA BRAWAND CHARLES 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE 10125 NW RIVENWOOD PORTLAND, OR 97223 CARLTON,OR 97111 1S135AA-00700 1$135AA-00701 WESTON JOSEPH E TIGARD C OF 2154 NE BROADWAY 13125 HALL PORTLAND, OR 97232 M ARD,OS�••••97223 1S135AA-00800 1S135AA-00803 NASH GORDON 0 AND PENNY J HERBERHOLZ LARRY S&CATHY D 10231 SW JEFFERSON 9620 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-00804 1S135AA-00805 LAI KHOAN VAN & VO VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01000 MILLS MICHAEL E AND ROWE SHIRLEY I AND WOOD 10211 SW JEFFERSON 1027 SW GROVER TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97201 1S135AA-01200 1S135AA-01400 ALLISON M DEAN&DOROTHY D BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST 7520 SW LANDAU ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01500 1S135AA-01600 VALLASTER GARRY J FRIES PATRICIA S 711 SW ALDER-PENTHOUSE 10225 SW 85TH PORTLAND, OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-01601 1S135AA-01602 WALP MATT AND CINDY TAYLOR RICHARD L 10207 SW 85TH AVE 10245 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-01700 1135AA-01701 SZALVAY LASZLO&IREN SZALV Y ZLO& IREN 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER 14550 AZELTREE TER TIGARD,OR 97224 TjeA RD,OR 7224 1S135AA-01702 1S135AA-01800 S VAY • : LO&IREN CHAVEZ HELEN W 14551 HAZELTREE TER 8407 SW LOCUST ARD,OR • 224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 (11 3O —F1 ) 1S135AA-01900 1S135AA-01901 BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT JOHNSTON TERRANCE F& 10250 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 1608 PORTLAND, OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135AA-02000 1S135AA-02100 STAATS SANDRA LYNN NOR Ls.sA TOMES INC PO BOX 20007 �118�34 S TH#202 KEIZER,OR 97307 yvrcTLAND, 97201 1S135AA-02200 1S135AA-02201 NORTHLAND HOMES INC LANDER GENE C&ANNA H 1834 SW 58TH#202 10375 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02202 1S135AA-02300 HARDING ROBERT B GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON 4130 SW ALICE 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02302 1S135AA-02303 LEE CARL M MARKELL KIMBERLY D 8505 SW OAK ST 10405 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02304 1S135AA-02305 ALLEN MARILYN L GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND 8525 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-02500 CAIN JAMES L LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD 10440 SW 87TH AVE SHERWOOD, OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02600 1S135AA-02700 PETERSON THEODORE S AND HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 8686 SW OAK 2300 SW FIRST AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135AA-02801 1S135AA-03700 EMMERT TERRY W DEMOULIN STEVE& 11811 SE HWY 212 10455 SW 87TH AVE CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-03702 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S CULLINAN RANDY J AND 8805 SW OAK ST 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ( 1S135AA-03703 1S135AA-03704 BRANDT WALDO G&PEARL E DE MOULIN STEVE& 8835 SW OAK ST 10455 SW 87TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03705 1S135AA-03707 ROMERO MERCEDES G AND HITCH DORIS 10385 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 35 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 1S135AA-03800 1S15AA-90000 LASHAWAY JULIE A DEODAR CON6OMINIUMS 8875 SW OAK OWNERS NITS TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90001 1 SZ35AA-90002 PETTY JOHN A HAWLEY EL M 10301 SW 87TH AVE 9055-8 91 VE#7 TIGARD, OR 97223 "PORTLAND,OR 9 23 1S135AA-90003 1S135AA-90004 SHERWOOD SYDNEY L& CONSER JEAN H AND 10305 SW 87TH AVE 10307 SW 87TH#4 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90005 1S135AA-90006 LAIRD SHAWN W& LOUISE M TAYLOR J EDWARD AND 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE 10311 SW 87TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-90007 1S135AA-90008 CONNET CARLEE SUE MORGAN DEANNA F 10313 SW 87TH 10315 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-90009 1S135AA-90010 HAWLEY HAZEL M FLETCHER MARY K 9055 SW 91ST AVE#7 16388 SW ESTURARY#101 PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 15135AD-01200 DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 05/03/99 12:41 $503 684 ,7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 ***********.L.1-1..1:************ *s* ACTIVITY REPORT *** *$$:E:*$$.{.4..6$$.$*:f:**$*$**$:k* • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 5067 CONNECTION TEL 5790203 CONNECTION ID START TIME 05/03 12:38 USAGE TIME 02'53 PAGES 5 RESULT OK ,/ Post-its Fax Note 7871 Page ��Pages► - '9 Co./Dept .0 WINIVIESIMLM. mPhone# ` J 3 I _ Fax if I , 7-7– 1 • • ._ :4;.." •,-.::- . ,,: • [ L .._ F .._ . . • ..: . . .„ co _I i .... . . . _ . . ... .L• „ . . ..• • . __ . . . , •. .. . ... . 0 . , ..: - ..:.:.:.,:,, ,,.•,. -,a -sanT _- CO _ '4'�'i' ''4'!' r r ' rr _ n -r - ' a•: r , r , . , . , raw: ; 87TH AVE m : i ..: —1 \—I ',•:. . ' •i . , : ,,.3'. :.,.,..i...',,..',:lk. . 7 r —.--7,„ o , —:;. , 7 1 1-- j I ' .I rr .t' ri 4ir L-t,'i4i4�'. .. _I I i , f i n 1' I -.----1 . .. .. 1 :...,.41 1 , I .:: 1-.' i ' 'I '''' x. 85TH AVE Via_ 4 riaztt- r e I "tce 0, /42 e - v■I r I •5 Liiif-cg'-tV•/1,11:107 )///5 4:04,04, IS /44 .44.4- +1 L.4.- •Q„.,* fo,t „Le, 944V 1 - - Property Data Selec w e 1,LODR~CONDOMINIUMS Prop ID : R1310254 (Real Estate) (267831) OWNERS OF UNITS Map Tax Lot : 1 S135AA ►4000 , 00000 Legal : DEODAR C■ 1 '.MINIUMS, THE, GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT, NON-ASSESSABLE DBR Year Built : Situs • Living Area: Code Area . 023. 81 Sale Info : 1958 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : BK 6 PG 16 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 0 (__) Current Levied Taxes : 0. 00 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments Taxable RMV $ 0 (=) *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 0 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or MET) to Exit : _ 0 CIAL CE RD - '� '1 X814 ' COM I : IRES OCTOBER 23,2001 a iri — - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: PETTY, JOHN A Prop ID : R1310263 zeal Estate) (301832) 10301 SW 87TH AVE Map Tax Lot - : "A 90001 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 1, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT , DBA • Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10301 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/15/96 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 126, 910 (+) Instrument : 96074995 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 126, 910 (-) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 337. 31 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 10. 69 Taxable RMV $ 126, 910 (=) L * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 87, 880 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr - -(5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) H istory (. ) More -- Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit: _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - --1 Owner: FLETCHER, MARY K Prop ID : R1310352 zeal Estate) (282562) 16388 SW ESTURARY #101 Map Tax Lot : 181? t BEAVERTON, OR 97006 Legal : DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 10, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10319 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 . . Sale Info : 09/29/95 :4114,900 1998 Roll Values Deed Type DW Improvements $ 127, 130 (+) Instrument : 95071598 Land 0 (+) a 1998 Tax Status Appraised f 127, 130 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 1,367. 28 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 93 Taxable RMV $ 127, 130 (_) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 89, 850 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HAWLEY, HAZEL M Prop ID : R1310343 al Estate) ( 107980) 9055 SW 91ST AVE #7 Map Tax Lot : 1S135A -90009 PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 9, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT p, "': SBA . . : Year. Built : 1984 Situs : 10317 SW 87TH AVE Living:Area:. yQs a ,. ,t �Area. . 023.81 Sale Info : 02/01/86 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 126, 990 (+) Instrument : 86009246 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraise( $ 126, 990 (=) „ nt Lev a11T s : 1a338. 06 Exemption ' $ 0 (-) 4 sire__~Ads.. I_<< -I */ Ct_al:IA 11A m-mmculis i AWslaW IQRQIJJ f\l•iV a4W,' .l.7V \�"/ *** No Taxes Due 9:** M50 Assessed $ 87, 930 (1) Pit Lisp (2) Pr....ary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Pro ert -, -----1 Owner: HAWLEY, HAZEL M Prop ID : R1310343 (Real Estate) ( 107980) 9055 SW 91ST A #7 Map Tax Lot : 18135AA-90009 PORTLAND, OR 223 Legal DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 9, , INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA : Year Built : 19F34 Situs : 10317 SW 87TH AVE Living Are. . 1521: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/01/86 1998 Roll Values . . .,. Deed Type : Improve , -nts $ 126, 990 (+) Instrument : 86009246 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status A• •raised $ 126, 990 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 338. 06 E emptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 10. 69 T-xable RMV $ 126, 990 (=) * ** No Taxes Due *** v,,0 Assessed $ 87, 930 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary ..i) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to xit : _ - - Property Cress Reference By Map Tax Lot - - t Enter M • Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135RA-90009' , or <RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90008 - - Property_Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90008' , or <RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90007 - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90008' , ^[p < - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135A11-90008' , ^[p< - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - ~ - Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA--90008' , or <RET . ..t o Exit : 1S135 -90009_ Property Data Selection Menu —1 Owner: HAWLEY, HAZEL M Prop ID : R1310343 (Real Estate) ( 107980) 9055 SW 91ST AVE, #7 Map Tax Lot : i9t 5/1442000� PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 9, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT ABA • Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10317 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 - Sale Info : 02/01/86 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 126, 990 (+) Instrument : 86009246 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 126, 990 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 338. 06 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 10. 69 Taxable RMV $ 126, 990 (_) *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 87, 930 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot — — — Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot — — Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AP-90009' , or <RET) turf€xit : 1S135AA-90008 ; Enter Map 7'ax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90009' , ,.Ip;.` p' ,Y _ - - Property_ CrossAilitereace By Mao Tax Lot - - I Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90009' , or <RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90008_ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: MORGAN, DEANNA F Prop ID : R131033 4 al Estate) (291952) 10315 SW 87TH AVE Map Tax L ?- - 0008 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : DEODAR C NDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 8, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA : Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10315 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 03/21/96 $119, 950 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 123, 510 (+) Instrument : 96024907 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 123, 510 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 300. 17 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 39 Taxable RMV $ 123, 510 (=) *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 85, 440 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - Enter Ma Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90008' , or (RET} to Exit : 1S135AA-'"'007_ Pro. .r'ty Cross Reference By Map "ax Lot Enter Map-- Tam Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90008' , - or (RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90007_ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CONNET, CARLEE SUE Prop ID : R1310325 al Estate) (63903) 10313 SW 87TH Map Tax Lot : 1S135A- TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : D CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 7, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10313 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1601 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 11/01/83 $64, 450 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 129, 460 (+) Instrument : 83042402 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 129, 460 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 375. 19 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 10. 99 Taxable RMV $ 1294460 (_) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 90,370 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Imps^ (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - • .4 • fi d �%i1 Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90007' , or <RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90007_ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CONNET, CARLEE SUE Prop ID : R1310325 (Real Estate) (63903) 10313 SW 87TH Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA-90007 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 7, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10313 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1601 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 11/01/83 $64, 450 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 129, 460 (+) Instrument : 83042402 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 129, 460 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 375. 19 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 10. 99 Taxable RMV $ 129, 460 (=) *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 90, 370 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90007' , or <RET> to Exit : 1S135AA-90006_ - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - • 41 ` 1 w n� Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90007' , - - Identify Property By Map Tax Lot - - Map Tax Lot Entered "1S135AA-90006" ## Property Map Tax Code Area Legal Description - Name 1. P2059218 1 S 13SA -9000 023. 81 ** DhLEFED * AFFILIATED PAJE OF OREGON 2. R1310316 1S135AA-90006 023. 81 DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT TAYLOR, J EDWARD AND - - End of List - - Enter "##" of Property, or <RET) to Exit : _ - - Identify Property Ry Map Tax Lot - - Map Tax Lot Entered "1S13SAA-90006" ## Property Map Tax Lot / Code Area Legal Description - Name 1. P2059218 1S135AA-90006 023. 81 ** DELETED ** AFFILIATED PAJE OF OREGON 2. R1310316 1 S 135AA-90006 023. 81 DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT TAYLOR, J EDWARD AND - - End of List - - Enter "##" of Property, or <RET) to Exit : _ - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - - • E1 er nt Map Tax Lot, ' . ' f - - AA-90006' , or MRET> to Exit : 1S135 -9000= - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: LAIRD, SHAWN W & OUISE M Prop ID : R1310307 (Real Estate) (264473) 10309 SW 87TH AV NUE Map Tax Lot : 1S13SAA-90005 PORTLAND, OR 97 23 Legal : DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 5, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 198 Situs : 10309 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 16 1 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 11/11/94 $109, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Ty-pe-r DW Improvements $ 129, 970 (-1-4- Instrument : 94104613 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 129, 970 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 407. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 25 Taxable RMV $ 129, 970 (_) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 92, 510 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (R T) } n F.:4 4-4-s _ `— - - Property Data Selection Menu - -- -1 Owner: LAIRD, SHAWN W & LOUISE M Prop ID : R1310307 (Real Estate) (264473) 10309 SW 87TH AVENUE Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA-90005 PORTLAND, OR 97^^3 Legal : DEODAR CONDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 5, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year :. t : 1984 Situs : 10309 SW 87TH AVE Li g Area: 1601 I Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 11/11/94 $109, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 129, 970 (+) Instrument : 94104613 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 129, 970 (_) .y Current Levied Taxes : , 407. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) 1 Special Assessments : 11. 25 Taxable RMV $ 129, 970 (_) * *** No Ta, s Due *** M50 Assessed $ 92, 510 1 (1 ) Alt Dis . (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen A► •r (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More E - - Property Cross Reference By Map Tax Lot - -- °2 j .S Enter Map Tax Lot, ' . ' for ' 1S135AA-90005' , ^Cp tE - - Property Data Selection Menu - - --1 Owner: CONSER, JEAN H AND Prop ID : R1310290 - -al Estate) (63900) HURST, JOSEPHINE Map Tax Lot : 1S135A4 9000 10307 SW 87TH #4 Legal ODAR - U`DOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 4, TIGARD, OR 97223 INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10307 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/01/84 $68, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 124, 970 (+) Instrument : 84033638 ;' Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 124, 970 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 341. 45 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 72 Taxable RMV $ 124, 970 (=) * *** Na Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 88, 150 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More / Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: SHERWOOD, SYDNEY L Prop ID : R1310281 1 Estate) (267589) 10305 SW 87TH Map Tax Lot : 15135AA -0003 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal . . ' DAR I DOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 3, INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT DBA Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10305 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 03/24/99 $28, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 123, 510 (+) Instrument : 99042544 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 123, 510 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 300. 17 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : , 10. 39 Taxable RMV $ 123, 510 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 85, 440 (1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Imps (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HAWLEY, HAZEL M Prop ID : R1310272 Estate) (107980) 9055 SW 91ST AVE #7 Map Tax Lot �15135AA 90002 PORTLAND, OR 97223 ' Legal : DEODAR NDOMINIUMS, THE, LOT 2, -_ INTEREST IN COMMON ELEMENT x,: DBA : Year Built : 1984 Situs : 10303 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1524 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 12/01/83 $68, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 126, 820 (+) Instrument : 84000279 Land $ 0 <+> 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 126, 820 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 338. 38 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 10. 69 Taxable RMV $ 126, 820 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 87, 950 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RE7> to Exit : _ - - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: WEINEL, BRETT M Prop ID : R270897 = 1 Estate) (325960) 8950 SW LOCUST ST Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA-069Or TIGARD, OR 97223 /// Legal OWN OF METZGER, BLOCK 4, LOT 1-2 12 DBA Year Built : 1997 Situs : 8950 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: 1612 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 09/29/97 $91, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 83, 670 (+) Instrument : 97098659 Land $ 70, 800 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 154, 470 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 958. 19 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 15. 65 Taxable RMV $ 154, 470 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 128, 680 ( 1) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, Prop ID : R200937 - 1 Estate) (266175) 621 SW MORRISON STE 725 Map Tax Lo • 8 .-03100 PORTLAND, OR 97205 Legal ACRES . 06, CODE SPLIT DBA Year Built : Situs Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 12/22/94 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 941122951 Land $ 2, 750 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 22, 750 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 24. 81 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments Taxable RMV $ 2, 750 (_) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 1, 630 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - --1 Owner: OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATI N, Prop ID : R239888 (Real Estate) (266175) 621 SW MORRISON STE 72° Map Tax Lot : 1S129-03102) PORTLAND, OR 97205 Legal ACRE°-1. 71, ODE SPLIT, SEE Al ACCOUNT(S) DBA Year Built : Situs : 8775 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 12/22/94 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 94112951 Land $ 154, 000 (+) iggA Tmi Gtntwwc Annr-aiqwri t 154. 000 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 217. 45 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments 11. 05 Taxable RMV $ 154, 000 (_) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 90, 850 (1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ , ' - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: MILLS, MICHAEL E AND Prop ID R270888 1 Estate) (63828) BEVERLY A Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 0080 10211 SW JEFFERSON — Legal :--7RET7bLK-, N OF, BLOCK E, LOT PTS TIGARD, OR 97223 8-10 |. DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10211 SW JEFFERSON ST Living Area: 1546 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 04/01/79 $49, 950 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 84, 170 (+) Instrument : 79013233 Land $ 49, 320 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 133, 490 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 557. 65 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 12. 45 Taxable RMV $ 133, 490 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 102, 360 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ 1 ) - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HAYZLETT, MAXINE TR Prop ID : R270744 r al Estate) (285603) 17015 SW ELDORADO DR Map Tax Lot : 1S135A°-0030 TIGARD, OR 97224 Legal : � L -~ "-RE TRACTS, BLOCK 22, LOT -^ PT 1 , ACRES . 75 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 10035/55 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 11/28/95 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 176, 500 (+) Instrument : 95087628 Land $ 145, 930 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 322, 430 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 3, 660. 10 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 33. 21 Taxable RMV $ 322, 430 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 273, 130 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: JOHANSSON, MARTIN & JOAN Prop ID : R270753 ~eal Estate) (363062) /WEGELE, MICHAEL & REGINE Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA daMMO 8701 SW LOCUST ST Legal : ETZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 22, LOT TIGARD, OR 97223 PT 6, ACRES . 23 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 8705 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 02/24/99 $112, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : C Improvements $ 5, 660 (+) Instrument : 99024604 Land $ 47, 590 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 53, 250 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 571. 93 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 5. 19 Taxable RMV $ 53, 250 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 42, 680 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: TURNER, STEVEN R Prop ID : R270780 1 Estate) (284044) PO BOX 25216 -- Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA- PORTLAND, OR 97298 Legal : RES . 11 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 8719 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 11 /02/95 $25, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 95081137 Land $ 32, 500 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 32, 500 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 259. 02 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 2. 35 Taxable RMV $ 32, 500 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 19, 330 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET> to Exit : __ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - --1 Owner: ROWE, SHIRLEY I Prop ID : R121675: l Estate) (63838) WOOD, JUDY Map Tax Lot : 18135 1027 SW GROVER Legal : ° * - . c. PORTLAND, OR 97201 DBA : Year Built : Situs • Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/01/81 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 81005099 Land $ 2, 700 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 2, 700 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 37. 98 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 30 Taxable RMV $ 2, 700 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 2, 500 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: BRAWAND, CHARLES Prop ID : R270799 l Estate) (334615) 10125 NW RIVENWOOD Map Tax Lot : 1S13514111114101 CARLTON, OR 97111 Legal : ACRES . 82 DBA • Year Built : 1954 Situs : 8740 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: 2068 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/21/98 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DO Improvement $ 72, 350 (+) Instrument : 98023848 Lanu $ 67, 260 (+) , qqa r~. c`+ +.~ O""~~° cod « 17;:q k1m /=1 - - -_ . _. - - ' -- . . ' Current Levied Taxes : 1, 616. 85 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 12. 92 Taxable Rh $ 139, 610 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxe,_ ^** M50 Assesseu $ 106, 250 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: EIDENSCHINK, IRMA Prop ID : R270806 l Estate) (63820) 8740 SW LOCUST DRIV ~--�- Map Tax Lot : 1S135' PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal : ACRES 1. 10 DBA • Year Built : Situs • Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 00CF1137 Land $ 15, 350 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 15, 350 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 129. 81 Exemptions $ 0 <-> Special Assessments : 1. 04 Taxable RMV $ 15, 350 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 8, 530 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner : BRAWAND, CHARLES -- Prop ID : R270815 al Estate) (334615) 10125 NW RIVENWOOD Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA-00600J CARLTON, OR 97111 Legal : METZGER, TOWN OF, LOT 1 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 8770 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/21/98 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DO Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 98023848 Land $ 26, 400 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 26, 400 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 223. 55 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 1. 79 Taxable RMV $ 26, 400 (=) * *** Unpaid Taxes *** M50 Assessed $ 14, 690 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: WESTON, JOSEPH E Prop ID : R27082 l Estate) (267758) BY WESTON INVESTMENTS CO Map Tax Lot : 1S135A 2154 NE BROADWAY Legal : ACRES . l6 PORTLAND, OR 97232 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 8745/75 SW LOCUST ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 nalp 7nfn ! 1p/mFI/q4 199n nnll oAl //pS Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 94109487 Land $ 5, 800 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised 3 5, 800 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 71. 90 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 65 Taxable RMV $ 5, 800 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 5, 380 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: TIGARD, CITY OF Prop ID : R2012106 al Estate) ( 191821 ) 13125 SW HALL - Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 0071 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : ACRES . 05, NON-ASSESSABLE DBA : Year Built : Situs • Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 12/03/90 $5, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 90066734 Land $ 220 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 220 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 0. 00 Exemptions $ 220 (-) Special Assessments : Taxable RMV $ 0 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 0 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - ' -1 Owner: LAI, KHOAN VAN & ^ Prop ID : R270860 l Estate) (289624) LE, THU THI Map Tax "+ . S135A1M2110 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE Legal : METZGER, TOWN OF, BLOCK 3, LOT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 PTS 1-3 & 5 DBA • Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10161 SW JEFFERSON ST Living Area: 1124 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/05/96 $115, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 69, 640 (+) Instrument : 96011536 Land $ 51, 920 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 121 , 560 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 436. 97 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 48 Taxable RMV $ 121, 560 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 94, 430 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ / - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: TYPE OUTLET INC, THE / Prop ID : P1258604 (Personal ) (23578) 10211 SW JEFFERSON ST Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA-00806 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : 1S122DD 00300 ^ ° DBA : Year Bui : -- ' -- __ - Code Area : 023. 81 111 Sale Info : Deed Type : 1998 Roll Values Instrument : 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 5, 174 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 0. 00 Exemptions $ 5, 174 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV $ 0 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 0 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (6) Ownership (7) History (8) Spec Assmt (9) Log (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: JOHANSSON, MARTIN & JOAN Prop ID : R270771 al Estate) (363062) %WEGELE, MICHAEL & REGINE Map Tax Lot : 1S135A 390 8701 SW LOCUST ST Legal : HUKES . 0G TIGARD, OR 97223 ___- DBA : Year Built : Situs • Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 02/24/99 $112, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : C Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 99024604 Land $ 9, 800 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 9, 800 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 105. 99 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 96 Taxable RMV $ 9, 800 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 7, 910 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: SILLS, DONALD N ET AL Prop ID : R270762 al Estate) ( 165379) % SNEED, PHIL & JOYCE Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA- 0305 .� 10115 SW HALL Legal :' ACRES . 65 ' TIGARD, OR 97223 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 10105-35 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 11/08/89 $100, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 82, 890 (+) Instrument : 89054508 Land $ 140, 730 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 223, 620 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 190. 72 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 19. 88 Taxable RMV $ 223, 620 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 163, 480 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: SAVAGE, PETER A AND ANN MARI Prop ID : R126332 l Estate) (247625) 10300 SW 90TH AVE Map Tax Lot : 1S1 - 0100O TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : METZGER, TOWN OF, BLOCK 19, LOT PTS n-4 DBA : Year Built : 1940 Situs : 10300 SW 90TH AVE Living Area: 2068 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/23/94 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 98, 500 (+) Instrument : 94018957 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 157, 500 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 833. 25 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 14. 65 Taxable RMV $ 157, 500 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 120, 470 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: ROWE, SHIRLEY I Prop ID : R1217301 Zeal Estate) (63838) WOOD, JUDY Map Tax Lot : 1S135A 1027 SW GROVER Legal . ' -, --mnn OF, BLOCK 21, LOT 9 PORTLAND, OR 97201 PLUS PT VACATED STREET DBA : Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 03/01/81 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 81007845 Land $ 300 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 300 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 4. 23 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 03 Taxable RMV $ 300 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 280 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: ALLISON, M DEAN & DOROTHY D Prop ID : R270995 l Estate) (263541 ) 3/4 ALLISON, ANNETTE C Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST Legal --: METZGEH, n OF, BLOCK 21, LOT 7-8 PORTLAND, OR 97223 PLUS VACATED STREET -' DBA • Year Built : 1950 Situs : 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST Living Area: 1168 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/26/93 $40, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : C Improvements $ 30, 670 (+) Instrument : 94101284 Land $ 47, 200 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 77, 870 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 991. 11 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 7. 92 Taxable RMV $ 77, 870 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 65, 130 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or /RET) to Exit : _ - - P ,perty Data Selection Menu - -1 A Owner: A 'ON, M DEAN & DOROTHY D _. -- _ - - -- - _- - - __-- - __--_ - ' ' _ . . _ - .__ Map Tax L 8 SW MAPLELEAF ST Legal ' -��, BLOCK 21, LOT 7-8 PO���AND, OR 97223 -�' ' �'� PLUS VACATED REET �� DBA • Year Built : 1950 Situs : 8870 SW MAPLELEAF ST Living Area: 1168 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/26/93 $40, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : C Improvements $ 30, 670 (+) Instrument : 94101284 Land $ 47, 200 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 77, 870 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 991. 11 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 7. 92 Taxable RMV $ 77, 870 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 65, 130 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner : SZALVAY, LASZLO & IREN Prop ID : R271048 al Estate) (237695) 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER _ ' Map Tax Lot : 1S135A -01700 TIGARD, OR 97224 ^�~-^ Legal : METZGER 1 RACT8, BLOCK 36, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : Situs : 10265 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 09/03/93 $440, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 147, 850 (+) Instrument : 93073935 Land $ 33, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 180, 850 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 898. 73 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 17. 23 Taxable RMV $ 180, 850 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 141, 690 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: SZALVAY, LASZLO & IREN Prop ID : R271057 ( l Estate) (237695) 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER Map Tax Lot : 1S135 401701 ) TIGARD, OR 97224 '_ Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 36, LOT PT 6 DBA • Year Built : Situs : 10265 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 09/03/93 $440, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 172, 490 (+) Instrument : 93073935 Land $ 44, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 216, 490 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 255. 31 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 20. 47 Taxable RMV $ 216, 490 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 168, 300 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More F"+pr, fin-Finn fr"m Qtinvp nr /RFT) tn Fxi * , . _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: TAYLOR, RICHARD L Prop ID : R1281231 F al Estate) (63848) 10245 SW 85TH Map Tax Lot : PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS BLOCK 36, LOT , , -/ PT 1 DBA : Year Built : 1983 Situs : 10245 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: 1037 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 07/01/85 $45, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 65, 490 (+) Instrument : 85025952 Land $ 47, 200 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 112, 690 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 154. 85 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 48 Taxable RMV $ 112, 690 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 86, 180 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: SZALVAY, LASZLO & IREN Prop ID : R271066 l Estate) (237695) 14550 SW HAZELTREE TER Map Tax Lot : 1S135A TIGARD, OR 97224 Lega • •- ' 7 ~ * `E TRACTS, BLOCK 36, LOT PT 6 DBA • Year Built : Situs : 10285 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 09/03/93 $440, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 172, 490 (+) Instrument : 93073935 Land $ 44, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 216, 490 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 255. 31 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 20. 47 Taxable RMV $ 216, 490 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 168, 300 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CHAVEZ, HELEN W Prop ID : R271075 l Estate) (63852) 8407 SW LOCUST \ Map Tax Lot : 1 806�) PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 36, LOT 5, ACRES . 73 DBA • Year Built : Situs : 10250 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 39, 060 (+) Instrument : 07250406 Land $ 158, 990 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 198, 050 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 074. 56 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 18. 82 Taxable RMV $ 198, 050 (=) * *** No Taxes DUE (-* M50 Assesse $ 154, 810 __( 11 ol + nic" (21 o =~" AI /71 ga,""ri=~" ��' (4) / Anil/rmnr - - ' - - -, —. . ���[— ' - , ' (5) Gen Appr (6) O���mrship (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: STARTS, SANDRA LYNN Prop ID : R271100 ~eal Estate) (310415) PO BOX 20007 Map Tax 'Lot : 1S135A -7v7'000 KEIZER, OR 97307 Legal : MET ~ * ~ TRACTS, BLOCK 38, LOT 1 & PT VACATED STREET, ACRES . 85 DBA • Year Built : 1997 Situs : 10360 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 01 /08/97 $291, 159 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 622, 750 (+) Instrument : 97002642 Land $ 185, 130 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 807, 880 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 8, 636. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 69. 02 Taxable RMV $ 807, 880 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 567, 560 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: NORTHLAND HOMES INC Prop ID : R271119 LReal Estate) ( 189641 ) 1834 SW 58TH #202 Map Tax PORTLAND, OR 97201 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT 2, LAND USE VIOLATION _ �~ DBA : Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area , 023. 64 Sale Info : 04/01/82 $66, 747 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 82010725 Land $ 47, 500 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 47, 500 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 354. 03 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 3. 21 Taxable RMV $ 47, 500 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 26, 420 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: LANDER, GENE C & ANNA H Prop ID : R271137 Estate) (322574) 10375 SW 85TH AVE ~_��'- Map Tax Lot : r135A* TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 1 DBA : Year Built : 1966 Situs : 10375 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: 1535 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 08/01/97 $ 164, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 76, 900 (+) Instrument : 97077294 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 135, 900 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 411. 61 Exemptions $ 0 (-) qnpr` Al ���pi �mpn+� , 1p' nl Taxahlp Rwo 1 1:-35' 900 (=) - -, . * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 105, 340 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: STAATS, SANDRA LYNN ^r Prop ID : R27110 " —Al Estate) (310415) PO BOX 20007 _-r Map Tax Lot : 1S135A KEIZER, OR 97307 Legal : METZGER " ' TRACTS, BLOCK 38, LOT 1 & PT VACATED STREET, ACRES . 85 DBA : Year Built : 1997 Situs : 10360 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 01/08/97 $291, 159 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 622, 750 (+) Instrument : 97002642 Land $ 185, 130 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 807, 880 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 8, 636. 79 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 69. 02 Taxable RMV $ 807, 880 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 567, 560 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HARDING, ROBERT B . ~.,_ Prop ID : R271146 1 Estate) (211632) 4130 SW ALICE Map Tax Lot : 1S135A PORTLAND, OR 97219 Legal ^ : METZGER TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 1 DBA : Year Built : 1966 Situs : 10335 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: 1200 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 05/15/92 $84, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 66, 440 (+) Instrument : 92033518 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 125, 440 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 254. 70 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 39 Taxable RMV $ 125, 440 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 93, 630 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner : GOLDADE, MICHAEL ELDON Prop ID : R271155 1 Estate) (345258) 8515 SW OAK Map Tax Lot : 191372~ TIGARD, OR 97223 --- Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : 1981 Situs : 8515 SW OAK Living Area: 918 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 10/20/93 1 Roll Values Deed Type : OC �NN� Improvemen $ 64, 030 (+) /"c+~..=m"+ , qAlm����� ��� ' ="d� it =,q mmm /-61 -'- ' . _____ _ -------- ���` 1998 Tax Status ��� Appraise $ 123, 030 (=) Current Levied Taxes : - 232. 05 Exemption $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 18 Taxable RM $ 123, 030 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 91, 940 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : __ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CAIN, JAMES L Prop ID : R27119 l Estate) (235213) 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD Map Tax Lot : 1S1354Q-02400„) SHERWOOD, OR 97140 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT ~~^- 5, SEE Al ACCOUNT (S) ~ DBA : Year Built : Situs : 8545 SW OAK ST Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 03/31/93 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 93055593 Land $ 60, 530 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 60, 530 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 495. 83 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 4. 50 Taxable RMV $ 60, 530 (--) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 37, 000 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: LYON, DONALD J HAZEL J Prop ID : R271208 cgRal Estate) (63867) 10440 SW 87TH AVE Map Tax Lot : 15135A• -02500„) PORTLAND, OR 97223 -- Legal ^ : METZGER RE TRACTS, BLOCK 38, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : 1950 Situs : 10440 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1272 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 65, 710 (+) Instrument : Land $ 75, 670 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 141, 380 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 596. 62 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 12. 76 Taxable RMV $ 141, 380 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 104, 920 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: DEMOULIN, STEVE & Prop ID : R271342 l Estate) (324494) LINN, MARGARET ~~~ Map Tax Lot : 0 10455 SW 87TH AVE Legal : A M, LOT PT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 DBA : Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area , 023' 81 Sale Info : 09/22/97 $128, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 97089005 Land $ 500 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 500 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 6. 99 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 06 Taxable RMV $ 500 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 460 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CHRISTENSEN, JACK L AND NANC Prop ID : R271351 1 Estate) (238630) 8805 SW OAK ST - Map Tax Lot : 1S135A -03701 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : ASHBROOK FARM, LOT PT 12 DBA • Year Built : 1958 Situs : 8805 SW OAK ST Living Area: 1054 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 09/17/93 $86, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 59, 460 (+) Instrument : 93077949 Land $ 76, 700 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 136, 160 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 493. 89 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 94 Taxable RMV $ 136, 160 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 98, 170 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: CULLINAN, RANDY J AND Prop ID : R271360 1 Estate) (63883) KRISTINA G Map Tax Lot : 1S135A 8775 SW OAK STREET - Legal : • ' ~ so', • M, LOT PT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 DBA • Year Built : 1960 Situs : 8775 SW OAK ST Living Area: 1064 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 10/01 /80 $60, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 59, 350 (+) Instrument : 80038498 Land $ 56, 050 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 115, 400 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 304. 29 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 42 Taxable RMV $ 115, 400 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 85, 710 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: ROMERO, MERCEDES G AND Prop ID : R271397 ~ 1 Estate) (271917) MOLINA, MARTHA A Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 3705 10385 SW 87TH AVE ~^� Legal~ : ASH~ ~dNy, m ' . LOT PT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 �� DWI • �1� vra ~ R.. il . ° t qFJA ��N& Situs : 10385 SW 87TH���E Living : 1166 �� Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 04/25/95 $99, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 65, 470 (+) Instrument : 95029221 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 124, 470 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 445. 36 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 11. 55 Taxable RMV $ 124, 470 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 94, 980 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET> to Exit : _ i — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Owner: HITCH, DORIS ,' Prop ID : R1491754 al Estate) (63887) PO BOX 35 / � Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 03707 ~~ BEAVERTON, OR 97075' Legal ` : ASHBROOK FARM, LOT PT 12 '' / ~' DBA : Year Built : 1988 Situs : 10387 SW 87TH AVE Living Area: 1121 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 04/01/88 $56, 047 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 73, 770 (+) Instrument : 88013772 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 132, 770 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 536. 81 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 12. 28 Taxable RMV $ 132, 770 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 100, 990 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — --1 Owner: LASHAWAY, JULIE A Prop ID : R271404 ~ ' - 1 Estate) (235411 ) % FINCK, DALE M & IDA LIF Map Tax L t : - �=m2 3800 8875 SW OAK Legal : ASHBROOK FARM, LOT PT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 ---�' DBA • Year Built : 1935 Situs : 8875 SW OAK ST Living Area: 1632 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 03/18/93 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DO Improvements $ 50, 310 (+) Instrument : 93059763 Land $ 112, 100 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 162, 410 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 737. 06 Exemptions $ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 13. 88 Taxable RMV $ 162, 410 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 114, 150 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET> to Exit : _ — — Property Data Selection Menu — — —1 Owner: WALP, MATT AND CINDY ._—~- - Prop ID : R12331 Estate) (63847) 10207 SW 85TH AVE ' ^ Map Tax Lot: 1135Ar—°�1601 � PORTLAND, OR 97223 I pnal ! wFTrnFn ArPP rRairTq n/ nrw 7.F. / nr PT 1 DBA Year Built : 1948 Situs : 10207 SW 85T1-i AVE Living Area: 1388 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 1.2/01/84 $39, 900 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 44, 420 (+) Instrument : 84049044 Land $ 50, 150 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised °.G 94, 570 (=> Current Levied Taxes : 947. 31 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 8. 60 Taxable RMV $ 94, 570 (=) * *** No Taxes Due .*.*.*. M50 Assessed $ 70, 690 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: VALLASTER, GARRY J -' Prop ID : R271020 ' -al Estate) (357207) 711 SW ALDER - PENTHOUSE Map Tax Lot : 1S135A .® PORTLAND, OR 97205 Legal - E TRACTS, BLOCK 36, LOT 2, ACRES . 77 DBA Year Built : Situs : 10230 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 01/07/99 1998 Roll. Values Deed Type : DBS Improvements $ 860, 030 (+) Instrument : 99002883 Land $ 167, 470 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised % 1, 027, 500 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 11, 572. 24 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 105. 01 Taxable RMV $ 1, 027, 500 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 863, 560 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu -. - -1 Owner: METZGER PARK APARTMENTS, INC Prop ID : R270717 - -il Estate) (300585) BY FANNIE MAE Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA- 411110 PO BOX 2614 Legal . .. ' - ,'E TRACTS, BLOCK 23, LOT PASADENA, CA 91102 1 & 6 DBA Year Built : Situs : 10025 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 07/26/96 $900, 000 1998 Ro]. l Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 710, 040 (±) Instrument : 96067505 Land $ 272, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 982, 040 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 11, 329. 13 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments 102. 80 Taxable RMV $ 982, 040 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 845, 420 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or. RET> to Exit : .__ -- - lipperty Data Selection Meng_ - -1 ____. Owner: PE EVERANCE LLC Prop ID : R270726 1 Estate) (290653) 4 SW PATTON RD Map Tax Lot : 1S135 � P[����AND, OR 97221 Legal : ME | l ACTS, BLOCK 23, LOT 5, ACRES . 71 ,' ' / DBA : Year Built : Situs : 10120 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 ' Sale Info : 04/29/99 $850, 000 1998 Roll Valqes Deed Type : DW Improvements $ ' 636, 970 (+) Instrument : 99054139 Land $ / 154, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ , 790, 970 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 8, 583. 76 Exemptions $~ 0 (—) Special Assessments : 77. 89 Taxable RMV $ 790, 970 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 640, 550 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - - Property Data Selection Menu - - ------ -1 Owner: PETERSON, THEODORE S AND Prop ID : R271217 = al Estate) (260550) DEAN, VIRGINIA J Map Tax Lot : 1S135A" -02600 8686 SW OAK Legal : ' ZGER ACRE TRACTS' BLOCK 53, LOT TIGARD, OR 97223 PT 1 DBA : Year Built : 1976 Situs : 8686 SW OAK ST Living Area: 1076 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 09/18/94 $90, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 61, 930 (+) Instrument : 94083353 Land $ 47, 200 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 109, 130 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 267. 89 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 13 Taxable RMV 3 109, 130 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 83, 320 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC Prop ID : R271226 ^ . l Estate) (63869) 2300 SW FIRST AVE Map Tax Lot : 1S135A 4c70 SUITE 104 L- . : ACRES . 44 PORTLAND, OR 97201 DBA • Year Built : Situs : 10505 SW HALL BLVD Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 10/01/79 $30, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 29, 700 (+) Instrument : 79047759 Land $ 72, 100 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 101, 800 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 195. 49 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 9. 55 Taxable RMV $ 101, 800 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 78, 560 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ _.~'' - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: EMMERT, TERRY W Prop ID : R27124 ~ 'al Estate) (209399) 11811 SE HWY 212 Map Tax Lot : 1S135° m-0280 CLACKAMAS, OR 97015 Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 52, LOT PT 2 DBA • Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/30/96 $80, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 96079127 Land $ 100, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 100, 000 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 550. 10 Exemptions $ 0 (-) opecicil Flyt: mC.v^= " �. 'T° _ * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 36, 150 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More / Enter Option from Above or MET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: ALLEN, MARILYN L Prop ID R1198420,42, l Estate) (322824) 8525 SW OAK ST Map Tax L TIGARD, OR 97223~ Legal : METZGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 8525 SW OAK Living Area: 1050 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 08/15/97 $133, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 64, 420 (+) Instrument : 97077963 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 123, 420 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 248. 80 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 33 Taxable RMV $ 123, 420 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 93, 190 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: GOLDADE, MICHAEL E AND Prop ID : R13204 l Estate) (63865) JANE A ~� Map Tax Lot : 135�� 8515 SW OAK ~� Legal : 7E | lbEF E TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT TIGARD, OR 97223 PT 6 DBA • Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 84015943 Land $ 0 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised Is 0 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 0. 00 Exemptions Is 0 (-) Special Assessments : 0. 00 Taxable RMV Is 0 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed Is 0 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/ Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner : LEE, CARL M Prop ID : R271 l Estate) ( 161532) 8505 SW OAK ST Map Tax Lot : 1S13 A-02302 TIGARD, OR 97223 Legal : METZGER-ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 8505 SW OAK ST Living Area: 1050 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 07/27/89 $62, 5 1 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvement Is 66, 150 (+) 1n5tirument : o-Vmurp �Milt.' ~ .,�, mmm `-r, — 1998 Tax Status Apprais $ 125, 150 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 57. 79 Exemption $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 41 Taxable RM $ 125, 150 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 93, 860 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - � -1 Owner: MARKELL, KIMBERLY D Prop ID : R271182 (Rtal Estate) (312245) 10405 SW 85TH AVE /�, ~ Map Tax Lot : 1S135AA 230 TIGARD, OR 97223 ^ Legal -°. : KETlGER ACRE TRACTS, BLOCK 39, LOT PT 6 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10405 SW 85TH Living Area: 1050 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 02/24/97 $127, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 66, 710 (+) Instrument : 97017254 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 125, 710 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 256. 57 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 40 Taxable RMV $ 125, 710 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 93, 770 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or (RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: VO, VIEN T & %.____----- Prop ID R270879 ___, CrEfal Estate) (302568) NGUYEN, CAM VAN Map Tax 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST Legal : METZGER, TOWN OF, BLOCK 3, LOT PTS TIGARD, OR 97223 5-8 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST Living Area: 1144 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 08/28/96 $121, 000 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 68, 340 (+) Instrument : 96078241 Land $ 51, 920 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 120, 260 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 402. 13 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11 . 20 Taxable RMV $ 120, 260 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 92, 140 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: LAI, KHOAN VAN & Prop ID (Real Estate) (289624) LE, THU THI // Map Tax 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE Legal OF, BLOCK 3, LOT 12 TIGARD, OR 97223 PTS 1-3 & 5 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10161 SW JEFFERSON ST Living Area: 1124 -.-. . .- • ---. -^ Sale Info : 02/05/96 $115, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 69, 640 (+) Instrument : 96011536 Land $ 51, 920 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 121, 560 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 436. 97 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 48 Taxable RMV $ 121, 560 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 94, 430 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: HERBERHOLZ, LARRY S & CATHY Prop ID : R270851 ( ~ ' l Estate) (289733) 9620 SW 90TH AVE Map Tax Lot : 19135 06-00802 PORTLAND, OR 97223 ~--'' - Legal : ' ' - , OWN OF, BLOCK 3, LOT PTS 1-3 DBA : Year Built : 1977 Situs : 10151 SW JEFFERSON ST Living Area: 1124 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/05/96 $114, 200 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 66, 540 (+) Instrument : 96012043 Land $ 59, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 125, 540 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 446. 10 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 11. 56 Taxable RMV $ 125, 540 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 95, 030 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: BESLEY PROPERTIES INC Prop ID : R271011 l Estate) (268883) 7520 SW LANDAU ST Map Tax Lot : 1S135A N TIGARD, OR 97223 ~-- Legal : METZGE RE TRACTS, BLOCK 37, LOT PT 1, ACRES . 78 DBA • Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 02/28/95 $148, 500 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DW Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 95013395 Land $ 170, 860 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 170, 860 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 2, 096. 98 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 16. 76 Taxable RMV $ 170, 860 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 137, 800 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More / Enter Option from Above or (RET) to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: BOOTH, JOICE GOSSETT ~~- Prop ID : R271084 (Real Estate) (63853) 10250 SW 87TH AVE Map Tax Lot : 19135A190(2 190 PORTLAND, OR 97223 Legal -------: METZ8ER 'ACRE 'ACTS, BLOCK 37, LOT PT 6 PLUS PT .:ATED STREET Ilk 411 °='` i ��N� ' = 2' ""^^~ ^ ^ j^ ^ Situs : 10250 SW 87TH���E Living : 2698 Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 22, 880 (+) Instrument : 09440635 Land $ 76, 700 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 99, 580 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 150. 28 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 9. 19 Taxable RMV $ 99, 580 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 75, 590 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: JOHNSTON, TERRANCE F & Prop ID : R271093 l Estate) (346843) MARY H Map Tax Lot : 18135A4 PO BOX 1608 ~ _-' Leg- : - -t-"ACTS, BLOCK 37, LOT TUALATIN, OR 97062 PT 6 PLUS PT VACATED STREET DBA • Year Built : Situs : Living Area: Code Area : 023. 81 Sale Info : 10/14/98 $104, 600 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : DPR Improvements $ 0 (+) Instrument : 98115745 Land $ 72, 000 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 72, 000 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 634. 87 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 5. 07 Taxable RMV $ 72, 000 (=> * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 41, 720 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ - - Property Data Selection Menu - - -1 Owner: FRIES, PATRICIA S Prop ID : R271039 l Estate) (63846) 10225 SW 85TH ___~ Map Tax Lot : 1S1�=1 TIGARD, OR 97223 - Le " : METZGER - ~E TRACTS, LOT PT 1 DBA • Year Built : 1983 Situs : 10225 SW 85TH AVE Living Area: 1204 Code Area : 023. 64 Sale Info : 04/01/84 $55, 400 1998 Roll Values Deed Type : Improvements $ 69, 250 (+) Instrument : 84013111 Land $ 47, 200 (+) 1998 Tax Status Appraised $ 116, 450 (=) Current Levied Taxes : 1, 206. 47 Exemptions $ 0 (-) Special Assessments : 10. 95 Taxable RMV $ 116, 450 (=) * *** No Taxes Due *** M50 Assessed $ 90, 030 ( 1 ) Alt Disp (2) Primary (3) Secondary (4) Land/Impr (5) Gen Appr (6) Ownership (7) History (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit : _ ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Debbie Adamski -TIF Estimate Page 1 From: Julia Hajduk To: Debbie Adamski Date: 11/9/99 4:59PM Subject: TIF Estimate Well, I am making my rounds and have now come to you for a request for a TIF estimate for a project. THe proposal is a 5,228 square foot office building. Half of it is dedicated to an eye doctor's office, the other half is un-decided at this time so it will REALLY be an estimate only. As I have told the others, if you are not"it" please feel free to forward this to whoever is. Julia Hajduk Associate Planner (503)639-4171 x 407 julia @ci.tigard.or.us www.ci.tigard.or.us y /7 /c.%i�r /�C� �s� • DATE: ) PLANS CHECK NO.: // - PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL Jam- OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 /‘-') V PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT r l INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT OCCUPANCY(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF 1 RATE DAY AVG.TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG.TRIP 11 11 BASIS: aZ 4� H�T r 1 '� .%j " - G1� f. �j 4� /1121e CALCULATIONS: of tio!4 x `( ,17 X # /84/ .445 ) q31[. e g9,3avz1P5 _ q3.9 co tt,� PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: e/ 4314." FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: 617/99 j:lscottkUitworksheet 99-OO.doc CC- WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK DATE: n I PLANS CHECK NO.: PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 A� PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION CRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER BASIS: 5 ,2 2�id acc, / CALCULATIONS: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: -at FS FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: 6/7/99 j:'scottkltil\worksheet 99-OO.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: //-/0- 9 PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL OQ _ OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL -$T9-3.00 INSTITUTIONAL _ $83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: O1/i) / CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER (PROMISSORY USE RATE Y NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF RATE WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP NER BASIS: 5 a a8,4 r CALCULATIONS: / 7 g , Lp PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: / 1172,P FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: ROAD AMT.: TRANSIT AMT.: PREPARED BY: 6/7/99 j:\sco616tiNvorksheet 99-OO.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK Land Use: 720 Medical-Dental Office Building Description A medical-dental office building is a facility which provides diagnoses and outpatient care on a routine basis but which is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical/surgical care. This type of building is generally operated by one or more private physicians or dentists. Additional Data Information on transit trip ends is not available. Information on person trip ends is not available. Information on truck trips is not available. Vehicle occupancy: Average of 1.37 for six of the sites surveyed. The range is 1.32 to 1.44. Peak hours of the generator: Weekdays 10:15 to 11:45 A.M. and 3:15 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. Saturdays 11 A.M. to 12 Noon. Most of the studies were conducted in the 1980's, at sites throughout the United States, with a number of studies from the New York, Louisville, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, and San Diego areas. The sites average 163 employees, 37,000 square feet gross floor area, and 181 parking spaces. itAverage densities are summarized in the following table: Medical-Dental Office Building Average Densities Independent Variables Average Range Employees Per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area 4.83 2.25 - 6.54 Employees Per Parking Space 0.84 0.55 2.40 81.53 26.00 546.67 0.17 Employees Per Gross Acre+ 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Parking Space 0.13 0.60 X000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Gross Acre 21.76 7.05 - 156.67 Parking Spaces Per Gross Acre 78.36 47.20 -503.33 The relationship between gross square footage and gross acreage varies considerably and is a function of the local zoning code, the nature of the development and landscaping, and the type of parking provided. It is suggested that when only the acreage of a building site is known, the probable building size in gross square feet be estimated from the average square footage per acre as shown in the above table. Source Numbers 8, 19, 98, 104, 109, 120, 157, 184, 209, 211, 253, 287, 294, 295, 304 Tiin n.----#:,..., 1........... 4 nn 4 n.c I.... :#,.M. ..l T. .-a..ti.... C....t......... 1 , Land Use: 710 General Office Building Description , ., A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers, and tenant services such as a bank or savings and loan, a ',fi restaurant or cafeteria, and service retail facilities. Nearly all of the buildings surveyed were in <' suburban locations. "v r,. ? Related land uses include Corporate Headquarters (Land Use 714), Single Tenant Office Building (Land Use 715), and Office Park (Land Use 750). If information is known about individual buildings, it is suggested that the general office ' '.: building category be used rather than office parks when estimating trip generation for F,f,,+ one or more office buildings in a single development. The office park category is more general in nature, and should be used when a breakdown of individual or different uses is a . not known. If the general office building category is used, and if additional buildings, ��. such as banks, restaurants, or retail stores are included in the development, then the development should be treated as a multi-use project. On the other hand, if the office park category is used, internal trip making is already reflected in the data and does not need to be considered. When the buildings are interrelated (defined by shared parking facilities or the ability to easily walk between buildings) or house one tenant, it is suggested that the total area or employment of all the buildings be used for calculating the trip generation. It is further suggested that area or employment of each individual building in a single project be used when the individual buildings are isolated and not related to one another. Additional Data Average weekday transit trip ends: Transit service at a majority of the sites surveyed was either non-existent or negligible. • Information on person trip ends is not available. Information on truck trips is not available. Vehicle occupancy: 1.2 persons per automobile. Varies by quantity and cost of parking, location of office, and region. Peak hours of the generator: Weekdays - Typically the same as the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of the adjacent street traffic. In some regions peaking may occur earlier or later and last somewhat longer than the 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. time frames. Trip Generation, January 1991 939 Institute of Transportation Engineers City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 15NcS* ,,z6Cie\ Terrance and Mary Johnston P.O. Box 1608 Tualatin, OR 97062 54P'$ ces Coil a,-.#0,1'I L i _. ' 1999' 00017 tIia-o/59 C}Vaie -1, LA- „r, �-c h 0.10-7s V'••II A(.4 bk,.l' d vz N of- ex, ektik 3100 M 1v to: ( •frr ' AN,y � ■ ck M•43 t"-AJJ reja. , S wDv ( b-k. ov 4)0,, L. 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA. SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 ci ((Ng- o a'l7 cir ts42 ..)\ s s\ 1,42,-Ay S-c fir ' vw S.reS.S l e ices 3 e . -4-11 bw1r•JN iPtx10 • 1 oo ( IS 3S-RA) At( ow Cxbss 04Q-4 pY)•k. PC1$i-t C r\ 1^. 7 `N T f ( # ) 4 Ala,N, ' I OT I°t (IA) , 1fr t 11 c� 1t, Ov. f VW,116 t r CSlmIgg1 -bool1) 1) ))-14 Grf2:1 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 December 27, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Wayne Gerig Tigard Plaza, Suite 248 11945 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Gerig: The City received your check for minor modification, however, you have not submitted any information for staff to evaluate and approve the minor modification. Please review the enclosed memo and submit a narrative responding to the criteria. In addition, you will need to submit 2 copies of detailed plans of the proposed modification. You also submitted a letter granting an easement to the property owner of tax lot 1900. The proper way to grant an easement is by a legal document recorded at Washington County. I have enclosed an easement dedication form for your use. Once you have recorded the document at Washington County, please submit a copy of the recorded document (with recording numbers on the document) for our files. We will then sign-off on that condition. Please feel free to contact me at 639-4171 x407 if you have any questions regarding this letter or your land use case. Sincerely, Julia Powell HajduI Associate Planner i:curpin\julia\sdr\Gerig Letter.doc c: SDR1999-00017 1999 Planning Correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 SD& /999-o0o/7 r S44Sf fS Go4o o' gec9`SE i' , is 4) /l14sfs' January 24, 2000 cu. � �?1 1�°��✓on' cCdL9/ ,1a1 y /i ta,ik .app l 2O Laurie Nicholson, Associate Planner (r City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REFERENCE : 10250 SW 87TH AVE Tigard, Oregon Dear MS Nicholson, I am the Executrix for the estate of Joice Booth, property owner of above referenced property. For your information my sister, Joice Booth, died December 22 , 1999 and I will be selling the property for her heirs . My intent is to market the property for commercial development . The legal description for referenced property follows : The West one-half of Lot 6 , Block 37 , Metzger Acre Tracts, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Mapleleaf Street that inured by reason of vacation Order 78-182 , recorded January 2 , 1979 as Recorder' s Fee No. 79000125 . Sincerely, \\) c� Janice Naslund Personal Representative for Estate of Joice Booth 7030-151st Ave. NE Redmond, WA 98052 425-885-1248 copy: Wayne Gerig, 0.D. 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle Beverton, OR 97007 CWan.ei . gam, 0.cD. RECEIVED PLANNING Jan. 10,2000 FEB 0 7 2000 To: City of Tigard Planning division From: Wayne L. Gerig, OD, Redwood Center, SDR1999-00017. CITY OF TIGARD RE: Minor Modification Review. I am requesting a minor modification to my site development review to try to better comply with the conditions of the site development approval,and to better utilize the space of my lot. I need efficient utilization of my lot and building to make the project attractive to lessees, promote and market my practice effectively,and be within a budget I can afford. Special attention has been given to the avoidance of potential traffic problems onto Hall Blvd.,and designing a building with enough leased space to make it financially feasible to move my practice. On page 12 of the site development review,under"driveway concerns",the Planning Dept. Staff encouraged me to explore"other options that would enable the driveway throat to increase in size". I have tried to address that concern, while providing for required parking in the event that I find a"medical" lessee in the future that would require more parking. My designer and I have explored every parking/building configuration in an attempt to develop the property efficiently. I need enough parking spaces to expand the medical part of my practice or provide for a potential medical tenant at a future date. I had on numerous occasions attempted to contact the owner and resident of lots#1900,just to the West of my property,in person and in writing. She had not answered her door, nor acknowledged my written correspondence in any way over a several week period. I had hoped to discuss with her a coordinated development of our adjoining properties, with particular regard toward parking, setbacks,buffers, and landscaping. Without the possibility of cooperation, and a coordinated development with my neighbor I had to abandon the possibility of obtaining a"landscape buffer easement"along the West Side of my lot. Therefore I had to rearrange my building configuration from a"L"shape to a"square"shape. My lot is to narrow to accommodate the building, parking lot,landscape buffer,ODOT land dedication, and useable interior design, all within 97 feet of property. Since then it has come to my attention that the neighbor to the West,Joice Booth, has passed away so there is no longer a resident on that adjoining property. Since the existing use of that lot(#1900)is not any longer used as a residence,there is no longer a setback/buffer requirement. The two lots are adjoining CN to CN Commercial Zones,and as defined in Table 18.745.1 Buffer Matrix of the Tigard Development Code, do not require a buffer or setback. I have contacted the deceased's sister and heir to the estate,Janice Naslund of Redmond WA. She has assured me that her intent is to sell or develop the property for commercial,rather than residential use,which would make the most financial sense for her. I asked her if she would write a letter stating that her intended use for the property will be for commercial development,and she has done so. Her letter is enclosed in this modification and she has also sent her letter to the Planning Dept. To maximize square footage, I have designed the building closer to the property line, since a landscape buffer is no longer required by Code. This allows for a larger and more"square" shaped building configuration, which is more efficient to build and design on a narrow lot, and better serves my needs. I am looking at this project for my immediate needs as well as for long range goals. Over the next few years I can envision a time when I will need more space for the expansion of my practice. A Partnership may develops with my Associate Doctor, or one or both, (heaven forbid), of my children may decide to join me in my practice some day. This longer range planning is why I am trying to utilize this lot to it's fullest potential allowed under the Code requirements. 1 feel what we have proposed in this minor modification addresses in a reasonable manner,the potential traffic concerns, Site Development Review conditions, and allows for a building size large enough to make the project economically feasible, and satisfies my long term needs. I sincerely hope that this modification 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 1 1945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 will satisfy your concerns as well, and still allow me to maximize my building utilization and exposure. Below are the answers to the eleven code criteria of the Minor Modification Review. NO. 1 The proposal does not involve a residential development,therefore, this standard does not apply. NO.2 This criteria is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. NO.3 The required parking for this use is 2.7 spaces min. per 1000 sq. ft. of gross floor area for office use, and 3.9 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. min. of gross floor area for medical use. With the addition of 1192 sq. ft. the building will equal 6420sq. Ft: 5220sq. Ft office use, and 1200 sq. ft medical use. Therefore 18.77 parking space min. and 28.48 spaces max. are required for this project. This is in compliance with the minimum and maximum standards. NO.4 No change in the structural occupancy type of the building is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. NO.5 No increase in the height of the existing building is proposed. The proposed expansion will match the height of the existing building,thereby satisfying these criteria. NO.6 This request will not require a change in accessways or parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected, in compliance with these criteria. NO.7 The proposed modification will not generate or exceed 100 additional vehicle trips to the site per day. NO. 8 The modification will increase the floor area by 1192 sq. ft. This is under 5000 sq. ft.,therefore the standard has been satisfied. NO. 9 There is no area reserved for common open space,therefore,this standard does not apply to the proposal. NO. 10 The proposed building modification will result in a rearrangement of some landscaping but the required 15%landscaping will be maintained. Prior to final occupancy,the applicant will verify that 15% landscaping is being maintained. NO. 11 Due to the parking changes needed to avoid traffic problems onto Hall Blvd., and to comply to minimum parking standards on-site, a crossover access to tax lot#1900(to the west of my site)would not be practical for the site development. Although only 19 parking spaces are required to satisfy the minimum requirement, I need 24 spaces in the event that I obtain a medical lessee,or expand my own medical square footage in the future. If I exercise my option to expand the medical square footage of my practice to 4000 sq. ft., which is allowed under a CN Zone, I will need 3 additional parking spaces to meet the minimum "medical"parking requirement. This would bring the total number of parking spaces required to 22 spaces. Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.705, section K,#2 states that parking area connections between adjacent properties shall be designed, unless not feasible. If I expand my practice to 4000 sq. ft.,which is not an unusual size for a mature Optometric practice with more than one Doctor,the additional parking required would deem a crossover access unfeasible. There would not be enough unused area, (24 ft. required by Code), for a driveway to the adjacent property. The crossover access easement between adjoining lots has been demonstrated to be unfeasible. It was part of a"recommendation,"instead of a"requirement,"by the Planning Dept. Staff in the Site Development Review,to help resolve a potential traffic problem onto Hall Blvd. The building and parking has been reconfigured to ease that traffic concern. Moreover,this lot will be the only lot on the West Side of the block,that will ingress/egress onto Hall Blvd.,between Locust and Oak Streets. All of the other properties on that side of Hall have alternative streets to access their properties. I am the only owner on the block who does not have an alternative access. Therefore,there will never be any traffic influence directly onto Hall Blvd. from the West,between Oak and Locust Streets,other than my building,which is not large enough to influence traffic in a significant way. Also, the CN Zone designation, and my low traffic usage, limits traffic influence onto Hall. I would argue that if a crossover access were utilized between my lot and the adjoining lot, it would actually create more traffic ingress and egress onto Hall Blvd. Traffic from the adjacent lot, when eventually developed, would certainly travel the shortest distance to get to Hall. They would more than likely pass through my parking lot to access Hall, rather than using SW 87th Avenue as intended. I also fear that neighborhood residents and patrons could use the crossover access. They could access Hall Blvd. through our adjoining parking lots, in an attempt to avoid the traffic signal lights on Oak and Locust Streets. Traffic onto Hall would actually increase, unless ODOT closed access to Hall completely,which would be highly unlikely, and very detrimental to my business. I do not believe this scenario would best serve anyone's interests, and actually could create a hazard for parking lot pedestrians as well as vehicles. Since the main concern,to ease traffic onto Hall Blvd., has been addressed, and a crossover easement is unfeasible, the modification will not preclude conformance to the original Site Development review's Conditions of Approval. This site expansion is in compliance with the minimum setback requirements set forth in the text and buffer matrix(table 18.745.1)of Chapter 18.745,of the Development Code: Landscape and Screening. The building height has not been changed from the original plans submitted, and landscaping standards will be adjusted as required in the conditions set forth in the Site Development Review(SDR1999-00017). Parking has been addressed in the text above, and in the plans accompanying this Minor Modification Review. We feel that with the restrictions and requirements set forth on this long and narrow piece of property,our development plan is the best we can propose when considering the flexibility needed for present and future usage, as described in the text above. Thank you for your time and understanding on this modification. Sincerely, itAs2 L Wayne L.Gerig,O.D. January 24 , 2000 Laurie Nicholson, Associate Planner City of Tigard, Oregon 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REFERENCE : 10250 SW 87TH AVE Tigard, Oregon Dear MS Nicholson, I am the Executrix for the estate of Joice Booth, property owner of above referenced property. For your information my sister, Joice Booth, died December 22 , 1999 and I will be selling the property for her heirs . My intent is to market the property for commercial development . The legal description for referenced property follows : The West one-half of Lot 6, Block 37 , Metzger Acre Tracts, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Mapleleaf Street that inured by reason of vacation Order 78-182 , recorded January 2, 1979 as Recorder' s Fee No. 79000125 . Sincerely, Janice Naslund Personal Representative for Estate of Joice Booth 7030-151st Ave . NE Redmond, WA 98052 425-885-1248 copy: Wayne Gerig, O .D . 15430 SW Bobwhite Circle Beverton, OR 97007 F?ECEIVEV �INNING '� . g $, 0.@.tu Feb.21,2000 City of Tigard Planning Dept. FEB ,2 2 2000 RE: SDR1999-00017 CITY OF rIGARD Dear Ms.Hajduk: I am responding in writing to your letter of February 11,2000 on my Minor Modification request (SDR 1999- 00017). I my want to modify my proposal to fit the parameters of a minor modification as defined by your Department,but I have not yet been able to speak with you about what that would entail. I would like to ask you for an opportunity to speak with you before you make a decision on my modification. I hope to contact you as soon as possible concerning this proposal, and changes there in, if you would be kind enough to grant me a little more time to do so. I have tried to contact you but have been out of town for the last few days, and have had difficulty corresponding,between our schedules. I would like to move ahead as quickly as possible with this project, as it is costing me time and money. I also respect your time and busy schedule. I want to make good decisions on this project however, and some things have come up beyond my control,delaying things,and causing me to think things over to utilize the property to the best of my ability. I still need to give my Optometry practice and my family the attention required while working on this project. I hope you will understand, and I thank you for your consideration. R ae\cti fu lly, `v 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD. OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 d�yyyearh�jpi1 . February 11 , 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Wayne Gerig Tigard Plaza, Suite 248 11945 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Gerig: The City received the information and plans needed for staff to evaluate your requested minor modification to the approved Redwood Center Site Development Review (SDR 1999-00017). Staff has read through this information and has determined that, as shown, we would not be able to approved the revisions as a minor modification because you clearly are not meeting the conditions of approval with this proposed modification (specifically, Conditions #9 and #20). Before issuing a determination, however, I would like to give you an opportunity to modify your proposal so that it fits the parameters of a minor modification. Please respond no later than February 22, 2000 in writing indicating whether you wish to modify your proposal. If I have not heard from you by that date, I will assume you do not wish to modify your proposal and will issue a decision on the modification. If a decision is issued, a new fee would need to be submitted for additional minor modification requests. I have talked with a gentleman that is considering purchasing the property directly to the west of your site. I strongly urge you to contact him, his name is Dale Richards and he can be reached at 625-6526 to discuss how your project could be compatible with a project he is considering. Because he is just in the preliminary stages, this would be an ideal time to coordinate a plan that would serve your needs as well as his. Please feel free to contact me at 639-4171, x407 if you have any questions regarding this letter or your land use case. Sincerely, ://14-464//4 .11( Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:curpin\julia\sdr\Gerig2 Letter.doc c: SDR1999-00017 2000 Planning Correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 t 3/3(N % gam, OM. Re : (" 4,.10 6 Cst,,Ikr- Sb(Z ( qq _ Goo CI- -VINO ■ S P\ kAl--0 QA)TThc a V- -11_0 e_cust 1,‘„,37 v,,,,i x fosrv\zt ck. vv-t IC)\-c,.) a e y o o\\r ea 4- 1, e4' - 1, eo fi Cam„v e - e X4-4 UR. i° C..ky QV 11 p V .r , _ te c-4,4 Jr w.A (1J1,cS1,,w.6 c,,A 4 3 S137s„‘ ckej ,1iss,b� ,. v'n 4 PIN.S kZ■r 00 0,11 ( -07Y\ (4-- _ pv„ ypkr S- - O-o 3 G - I ki 0 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 • a EASEMENT DATED: MARCH 2000 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, OR 97007 BETWEEN: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig Estate of Joice G. Booth 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle JaniceNaslund, Personal Representative Beaverton, OR 97007 Grantor Grantee CONSIDERATION: None-grant made to fulfill condition of land use approval. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig, hereinafter termed "Grantor", for and in consideration of the sum of$ None , and the benefits accruing to Grantor herefrom, does hereby grant,bargain, sell and convey to the Estate of Joice G. Booth,Janice Naslund,Personal Representative, Circuit court of the State of Oregon for Washington County, Probate Case No. C0000 1 OPE, hereinafter termed "Grantee," the following described interest in real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A PERMANENT EASEMENT for an o ep nine betweep abutting pro e ' s to allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between parking lots on the respective properties,on,over,across,and through the following described opening location: 106 CP C u, N Beginning at the northwest corner of the east one- If of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of W shington and the State of Oregon,thence south 00.07'52" west along the wes line of said east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, l9 feet to the true point of beginning of said opening for ingress and egress, thence continuing south along said line 24' to the terminus of said opening. The rights and privileges herein granted to the Grantee are subject to condition that the grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns, shall grant to Grantor, and Grantor's heirs, successors, and assigns, a reciprocal easement for an ingress and egress crossover drive aisle between parking lots on the respective Grantor and Grantee parcels. This easement is granted solely for the benefit of the west '/2 of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, said benefitted parcel also being known as Tax Lot 1900, Washington County Assessor's Map No. 1 S 13 5AA. Page 1 - EASEMENT ►3r/ qtr - Pl¢95)c (ev,eL) t/7,s emit c) me dccc I y 4r/ /�n� �1�0� ,f . , 7 provLcres gc&csS A 9 J'9(ell'. /9/sb. y/'i is ,� rev,'e J cI 45'4 41/%00e-4,04 -CDR2/WY-oc1q/7 '4 ,4terns/sue eS A,s _- (/lNe/le/k-/jie-e/jf 4i 4/ytLL�50,-6 a:AszCr«s, Co/a42>•0, ;et. Pk-1 I 1- E b.r- A�S ��� . : Acts vim- G A24-' v,nr � H.,5 was s /- . 4N Gam. sac c-J �Ci�+N S "rc46— PA;r/ f 4U- )1 V 4l(L 116414:3-- Nree- i.") is Cam, 13/za/zoo-o . ' The Grantor hereby warrants that he has fee simple title and estate in the above-described land, that he has a full legal right to grant unto Grantee the easement right and privileges hereinabove set forth,and covenant that he will warrant and defend the easement rights herein granted from all unlawful claims whatsoever. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described and granted easement unto the Grantee and Grantee's assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has affixed Grantor's signature this day of March, 2000. Wayne L. Gerig Candice M. Gerig STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Wayne L. Gerig. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Candice M. Gerig. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: Page 2 - EASEMENT /Ob RECEIVED MAR 212004 n �OMMUNI� DEVELOPMEN1 C..Q-6 1 �vr " CA -. CA fit. PeAt-AA , Si - av6 °3- 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 EASEMENT DATED: MARCH 2000 AF"1'ER RECORDING RETURN TO: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, OR 97007 BETWEEN: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig Estate bf Joice G. Booth 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Janice Naslund, Personal Representative Beaverton, OR 97007 Grantor Grantee CONSIDERATION: None - grant made to fulfill condition of land use approval. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig, hereinafter termed "Grantor", for and in consideration of the sum of$ None , and the benefits accruing to Grantor herefrom, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to the Estate of Joice G. Booth, Janice Naslund,Personal Representative, Circuit court of the State of Oregon for Washington County, Probate Case No. C000010PE, hereinafter termed "Grantee," the following described interest in real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A PERMANENT EASEMENT for an opening between and across abutting properties to allow for a future crossover right-of-way and drive aisle connection between parking lots on the respective properties, on, over, across, and through the properties to provide Grantee's property access to Hall Boulevard and Grantor's property access across Grantee's property to and from Southwest 87 Avenue. The opening location between the properties for said easement is described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and the State of Oregon, thence south 00.07'52" west along the west line of said east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, 18.5 feet to the true point of beginning of said opening for ingress and egress, thence continuing south along said line 24'_to the terminus of said opening. The reciprocal easement when fully granted shall allow vehicles to cross through the parking lots on the respective parcels to Hall Boulevard and to Southwest 87th Avenue. The rights and privileges herein granted to the Grantee are subject to condition that the grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns, shall grant to Grantor, and Grantor's heirs, successors, and assigns, a reciprocal easement for an ingress and egress crossover right-of-way drive aisle between parking lots on the respective Grantor and Grantee parcels and to Southwest 87" Avenue. Page 1 - EASEMENT This easement is granted solely for the benefit of the west '/2 of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, said benefitted parcel also being known as Tax Lot 1900, Washington County Assessor's Map No. 1 S 135AA and shall be usable by Grantee only when and if Grantee grants to Grantor the reciprocal easement described above for the benefit of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS. The Grantor hereby warrants that he has fee simple title and estate in the above-described land, that he has a full legal right to grant unto Grantee the easement right and privileges hereinabove set forth, and covenant that he will warrant and defend the easement rights herein granted from all unlawful claims whatsoever. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described and granted easement unto the Grantee and Grantee's assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has affixed Grantor's signature this day of March, 2000. Wayne L. Gerig Candice M. Gerig STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Wayne L. Gerig. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Candice M. Gerig. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: Page 2 - EASEMENT 3P-1 /6T cW ►t�. Vy •. Wh9 N 66 L RECEWF^ kE ASS CiA,4 I CAA1 cnr-• MAR 21 7i'P COMMUNITY w4� SDR ) cct - 00 p p(K, 47P('(1 J 6,00 b 0 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 •.^�__ a+.�._,_....__ - _ _ - ._v._. • - .i'.1',y:♦1Y4:�•T'4i•ru'�"4'12Y.�Jdt...._�_.._�a..: _`is6^:fl�INf. • EASEMENT DATED: MARCH 2000 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Beaverton, OR 97007 BETWEEN: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig Estate of Joice G. Booth 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Janice Naslund, Personal Representative Beaverton, OR 97007 Grantor Grantee CONSIDERATION: None - grant made to fulfill condition of land use approval. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig, hereinafter termed "Grantor", for and in consideration of the sum of$ None , and the benefits accruing to Grantor herefrom, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to the Estate of Joice G. Booth, Janice Naslund,Personal Representative, Circuit court of the State of Oregon for Washington County, Probate Case No. C000010PE, hereinafter termed "Grantee," the following described interest in real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A PERMANENT EASEMENT for an opening between and across abutting properties to allow for a future crossover right-of-way and drive aisle connection between parking lots on the respective properties, on, over, across, and through the properties to provide Grantee's property access to Hall Boulevard and Grantor's property access across Grantee's property to and from Southwest 87 Avenue. The opening location between the properties for said easement is described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and the State of Oregon, thence south 00.07' 52" west along the west line of said east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, 18.5 feet to the true point of beginning of said opening for ingress and egress, thence continuing south along said line 24'to the terminus of said opening. The reciprocal easement when fully granted shall allow vehicles to cross through the parking lots on the respective parcels to Hall Boulevard and to Southwest 87th Avenue. The rights and privileges herein granted to the Grantee are subject to condition that the grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns, shall grant to Grantor, and Grantor's heirs, successors, and assigns, a reciprocal easement for an ingress and egress crossover right-of-way drive aisle between parking lots on the respective Grantor and Grantee parcels and to Southwest 87th Avenue. Page 1 - EASEMENT • This easement is granted solely for the benefit of the west '/2 of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, said benefitted parcel also being known as Tax Lot 1900, Washington County Assessor's Map No. 1 S 13 5 AA and shall be usable by Grantee only when and if Grantee grants to Grantor the reciprocal easement described above for the benefit of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS. The Grantor hereby warrants that he has fee simple title and estate in the above-described land,that he has a full legal right to grant unto Grantee the easement nght and privileges hereinabove set forth,and covenant that he will warrant and defend the easement rights herein granted from all unlawful claims whatsoever. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described and granted easement unto the Grantee and Grantee's assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has affixed Grantor's signature this day of March, 2000. Wayne L. Gerig Candice M. Gerig STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Wayne L. Gerig. . Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2000, by Candice M. Gerig. - -_- — Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: Page 2 -EASEMENT . -Copy j March 28, 2000 CM' OF 11GARD Wayne Gerig OREGON Tigard Plaza, Suite 248 11945 SW Pacific Highway Tigard ,OR 97223 RE: Minor Modification (MMD1999-00021) to existing approved site plan for SDR1999-00017 Dear Mr. Gerig: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to modify the existing approved site plan for SDR1999-00021 (WCTM 1S135A, Tax Lot 1901.) The proposal is to modify the approved site plan by "flipping" the building location so that the building will run along the south and southwest property line instead of the north and northwest property line. The information utilized in reviewing this modification was provided by the plans dated 3-13-2000. The property received Site Development Review approval in November (SDR1999- 00017). This property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). The Tigard Community Development Code Site Development Review Section states that if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, the request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application. Section 18.360.050.B states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not include the addition of any dwelling units. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve the addition of residential dwelling units, as previously indicated. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposal does increase the size of the building by 916 square feet, however the plan does not require more parking than that proposed and approved originally. The plan continues to provide 21 parking spaces which is 3 more than the minimum. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structure of the building is proposed. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No change in the height of any building is proposed. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Page 1 of 2 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected. The access is essentially in the same location as originally approved. The proposal also provides for a joint access with the western property as required by a condition of approval. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site, and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The proposed modification will not result in an increase in vehicular traffic to or from the site. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The floor area is proposed to increase by 916 square feet which is less than 5,000 square feet and 10%. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent. There is no area reserved for common open space, therefore, this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreational facilities; Screening; and/or, Landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan. The proposal does result in less landscaping than originally approved, however, this is still over the 10% required by the code. The revised plan provides 16% landscaping. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval which are not the subject of B. 1 through 10 above. The proposal addressed many of the conditions of approval. The proposal modifies condition of approval #2, however, it has come to staffs attention that this property is no longer a residence and is intended to be developed in accordance with the C-N permitted uses. Because of this, condition #2 is no longer a valid condition and therefore, does not trigger a major modification. All other conditions can continue to be met after this modification, however, not all conditions have been met. The applicant still must meet all of the conditions of approval for SDR1999-00017 before obtaining Site and Building permits. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site, provided the applicant complies with all conditions of SDR1999-00017 with the exception of Condition #2. This letter will be placed in the land use file and is considered part of the approved plan. Any further modifications to the approved plan must be reviewed and approved as well. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639-4171. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajdu Associate Planner is\curplan\julia\minmod\Redwood center.doc c: MMD1999-00021 Land Use File SDR1999-00017 Land Use File Page 2 of 2 09/26/2000 ■ ,editions Associated with Ca_ #: SDR1999-00017 12:57:37 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Code Title Hold Status Changed B y Tag Updal 0001 MODIFY LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Not Met 12/22/ 1. Modify the landscape plan to show no vegetation will be located within the vision clearance triangle that is greater than 3 feet in height or tl below 8 feet in height. 0001 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Met 02/01/2000 JPH 02/01/: 2. Submit a revised landscape plan that provides at minimum.a 6-foot landscape buffer and a 6-foot wall along the west property line. JPH 2-1-2000-condition is no longer applicable because property to the west will be sold for commercial purposes. 0001 MODIFY LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Met 03/27/2000 JPH 03/27/: 3. Modify the landscape plan to show the 2 trees closest to the access drive will be removed. 0001 REVISED PLAN HDCP SPACE 0 Met 03/27/2000 JPH 03/27/: 4. Submit a revised plan that shows a van accessible handicap space will be provided that includes a 9-foot-wide space with an 8-foot aisle. 0001 PARKING SPACE DIMENSIONS 0 Met 03/27/2000 JPH 03/27/: 5. Submit plans that clearly indicate the parking space dimensions. The standard spaces may not be less than 8.5 x 18.5,the compact spac less than 7.5 x 16.5 and the van accessible handicap space may not be less than 9 x 18.5 with an 8-foot-wide aisle. 0001 BICYCLE RACK 0 Not Met 12/22/ 6. Submit a detail of the bicycle rack. 0001 REV. PLAN BICYCLE SPACE 0 Not Met 12/22/ 7. Submit a revised plan that shows 3 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. 0001 REVISED PRKG CALCULATIONS 0 Not Met 12/22/ 8. If,as a result of modifications made to meet other conditions,the building size is reduced below 5,228 square feet,the applicant must sub parking calculations to insure that the maximum parking space requirement is not exceeded. 0001 REV. PLAN FUTURE PRKG-W 0 Met 03/27/2000 JPH 03/27/: 9. Submit a revised plan that provides for a future parking lot connection to the property to the west. 0001 TREE PROTECTION FENCING 0 Not Met 12/22/ 10. Prior to any site work,tree protection fencing must be in place to insure that no trees are harmed during construction. 0001 TREE MITIGATION PLAN 0 Met 09/26/2000 JPH 09/26/: 11. Prior to issuance of site or building permit,submit a tree mitigation plan showing how the 113 caliper inches will be mitigated(on-site,off- paying a fee in-lieu). If the fee in-lieu option is chosen,this fee must be paid prior to issuance of building permits. If on or off-site mitigation is bond for the replanting of 113 caliiper inches must be provided. (total mitigation required is actually 35 inches after more detailed tree removal plan-jph 9-26-00) 0001 HOURS OF OPERATION 0 Met 12/27/1999 JPH 12/27/ 12. Submit written confirmation of the hours of operation in order for staff to confirm that the hours will not exceed 7:00AM to 10:00PM. This confirmation must also verify that all future tenants will be made aware of the zoning restrictions in this zone. 0001 LIGHTING PLAN 0 Not Met 12/22/ 13. Submit a lighting plan for the Police Department review and approval. 0001 WASTE HAULER 0 Met 09/26/2000 JPH 09/26/: 14. Submit a written sign-off from the franchise waste hauler that the proposed facility meets the waste hauler standards. 0090 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Not Met 12/22/ 15. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer conr Hall Boulevard. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: Thf addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. Page 1 of 2 09/26/2000 ,ditions Associated with Ca #: SDR1999-00017 12:57:37 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Code Title Hold Status Changed B Y Tag Updal 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO READ 0 Not Met 12/22/ 16. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address anc number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the stat the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering De delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Not Met 12/22/ 17. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 0114 OBTAIN OR HWY PERMIT FOR ROW WORK 0 Not Met 12/22/ 18. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division to perform work within the right-of-way(ROW)of SW Hall I copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 0001 ADDITIONAL ROW 0 Not Met 12/22/ 19. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division,alor of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerlin that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information,conta Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation,Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037: Phone: 731-8461). 0001 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT 0 Met 09/26/2000 JPH 09/26/: 20. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall grant an ingress/egress easement to the owner of Tax Lot 1900(1; allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between the two properties. The general location of the easement should be to the south c building location. 0001 PERMIT/WATER CONNECTION 0 Not Met 12/22/ 21. The application shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the Cit improvement permit. 0041 H2O QUAL FAC INSTALLED ON SITE 0 Not Met 12/22/ 22. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brain Rager)for review anc to issuance of the building permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for reviE approval. 0001 WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 Not Met 12/22/ 23. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from the Engineeri 0001 USA 0 Not Met 12/22/ 24. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for c the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final buil the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in complia design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 0001 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0 Not Met 12/22/ 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project,or they in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal option is chosen,the amount will be$5,665 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 0001 TREE REMOVAL 0 Not Met 12/22/ 26. Prior to Final Inspection,trees numbered 5,56,63 and 64 may not be removed without prior approval from the planning staff and re-calm mitigation requirements. Staff Contact: Julia Powell Hajduk, Planning Division. Page 2 of 2 Gad4ot 50P,1999-000/7 CWalant May 30,2000 RE: TREE MITIGATION PLAN SDR 1900-00017 REDWOOD CENTER This report is in compliance with the Conditions of Approval #11 of Site Development Review#1999-00017; Redwood Center. As per the Arborist's Assessment,there are 10 preservable trees over 12 inches in caliper: #05, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 35, 56,63,and 64. From the Landscaping Plan you will see that I plan to keep and preserve 6 preservable trees,all the Giant Sequoia Redwoods but one. Preserved trees would be: #05, 10, 12, 13, 14,and 64 Preservable trees to be removed are: #11,35,56,and 63. The total caliper inches of the preservable trees to be removed are: #11-20",#35-15",#56-15",and#63-15". This is a total of 65 inches. Tigard Development Code Section 18.790.030,pertaining to tree removal,specifies that the Tree Plan has a program to save or mitigate preservable trees over 12 inches calipered. Retainage of from 50 to 75%of preservable existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50%of the trees to be removed be mitigated. Since I am retaining 60% of the preservable trees I will need to mitigate 50%of 65 inches for a total of 33 inches. The mitigatable trees will be mitigated in the following manner: ON SITE: Mitigation eligible trees not regwired as part of the landscaping requirements: 3 Western Red Cedar or Giant Sequoia Redwood (3"):3x3=9 inches 7 Chanticleer Pear(3"): 7x3=21 inches TOTAL: 30 INCHES Mitigation eligible tree inches in excess of required tree inches needed in Landscape Plan to met landscape requirements: 5 Chanticleer Pear(3"): 3"-2"required=1"Mitigation Eligible. 5x1"=5 inches TOTAL; 5 INCHES GRAND TOTAL; 35 INCH Since 35 inches are mitigation eligible,and 33 inches are required,the tree mitigation plan/requirement has been met "on site". A small Landscape Plan drawing has been enclosed,with highlighting added,to help clarify Mitigation Eligible trees both in"excess"and "non required"in the landscape plan. Wayne L. Gesig,O. D. 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 'S‘� 1qO0 Ooo (r3. Reskwad Czf+R , .; E 741-1----" ', .--a e-p — rte-'.� .i iri / •, if;4 �•(AM'�f(IAP71P A r Er., .rte — 6I.�M a '` � ::::: o .. ., I .:-_-_---„:-.:_-__ rillft". - 4 — _ - -t I R —i x4 -_ - jy , =I,.7.c,90 Nil,s6: 84o _Ad 7 -- .C� n 1 im.P.Air '''—I A - - -.•,,4(1Z 4i1N. AMIL , . .. .II t + ' . 1. 'C-Geri ��� - 04(01 4-<<.`- u C4, ii?Quola.• . ---- - (a--t)---. ...b .?-1._4C-'...(‘ .. eUk<N1 . ' . __...,......__�_..`.-_. .._...._. _ 1.rim.yo.r D M .... . v,,A.,i g Ix e.�,i 1 l� I ∎-C e_$ IAA rre e w t�-� h s P/s-R--- G i' N.,•,4- s C Ai, , ACC cti, e vrn, -- $1-.k k t j R-1-Lk a e,1 ti t 6l-t 4 re ,•w•ci.es ti;,. It)cea.OA-, 0 C c,.,c (4 .sr-e- N. Cir.2 S . a fm f. -coo'14)*,20 Sfm-coo/7 ��'�TE OF OREGON t ss - Ity of Washington f I, Jerry dh!• of Assess- . ment and -+r• �•• ,—*V• o County Clerk for •�� !���+��-'.�r�1-rtify that EASEMENT �a .� �+ a., the wit � •� �t���-� � n"`- ��)eceived and re !•r' .. . ,ti •f said county "� 5 +s .. '-3 \\ DATED: MARCH ati 2000 * ` � :''MM, 4. r ,, erector of AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ^�' �= ?` %�axation,Ex- - !Y�.1� lerk Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig Doc : 2000025405 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Rect: 251892 27.00 Beaverton, OR 97007 03/31/2000 10:48:06am BETWEEN: Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig Estate of Joice G. Booth 15430 S. W. Bobwhite Circle Janice Naslund, Personal Representative Beaverton, OR 97007 Grantor Grantee CONSIDERATION: None-grant made to fulfill condition of land use approval. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Wayne L. Gerig and Candice M. Gerig, hereinafter termed "Grantor", for and in consideration of the sum of$ None , and the benefits accruing to Grantor herefrom,does hereby grant,bargain, sell and convey to the Estate of Joice G. Booth,Janice Naslund,Personal Representative, Circuit court of the State of Oregon for Washington County, Probate Case No. C000010PE, hereinafter termed "Grantee," the following described interest in real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A PERMANENT EASEMENT for an opening between and across abutting properties to allow for a future crossover right-of-way and drive aisle connection between parking lots on the respective properties, on, over, across, and through the properties to provide Grantee's property access to Hall Boulevard and Grantor's property access across Grantee's property to and from Southwest 8r Avenue. The opening location between the properties for said easement is described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and the State of Oregon, thence south 00.07'52"west along the west line of said east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, 18.5 feet to the true point of beginning of said opening for ingress and egress, thence continuing south along • said line 24' to the terminus of said opening. The reciprocal easement when fully granted shall allow vehicles to cross through the parking lots on the respective parcels to Hall Boulevard and to Southwest 87th Avenue. The rights and privileges herein granted to the Grantee are subject to condition that the grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns, shall grant to Grantor, and Grantor's heirs, successors, and assigns, a reciprocal easement for an ingress and egress crossover right-of-way drive aisle between parking lots on the respective Grantor and Grantee parcels and to Southwest 87th Avenue. Page 1 -EASEMENT .t This easement is granted solely for the benefit of the west 'h of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, said benefitted parcel also being known as Tax Lot 1900, Washington County Assessor's Map No. 1 S 135AA and shall be usable by Grantee only when and if Grantee grants to Grantor the reciprocal easement described above for the benefit of the east one-half of Lot 6, Block 37, METZGER ACRE TRACTS. The Grantor hereby warrants that he has fee simple title and estate in the above-described land, that he has a full legal right to grant unto Grantee the easement right and privileges hereinabove set forth, and covenant that he will warrant and defend the easement rights herein granted from all unlawful claims whatsoever. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described and granted easement unto the Grantee and Grantee's assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has : ; xed Grantor's signature this a day of March, 2000. I i 1 , , 1. -C a e L. Gerig eal/dta. ii)) Candice M. Gerig STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on !J 7 ,/ch p14 , 2000, by Wayne L. Gerig. s:"-7 OFFICIAL SEAL ( ''•' AMBER C.JC.ORE G�,� ,� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.308003 Notary Public for Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 28,2001 ry g My Commission Expires: ,a,i,`xj,- / STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on �!i /t/L (3Q5/ , 2000, by Candice M. Gerig. .2 t% /7 OFFICIAL.SEAL ��L� /� (-1\''' AMBER C.COBURN ,/ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public r Or on COMMISSION NO.308003 My Commission Expires: /�,�� 2O)/ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC 28,2001 ak'f Page 2 - EASEMENT (D■ MAR 28 '00 10:02AM MIl I_ER'S al'ikon. L' OKI999- 000/7 P.2 ff SANITARY SERVICE, INC. P A X T R A N S M I S S I O N DATE : TO : �r�GZ ;t FAX NUMBER : 5 ' 64 FROM : ,�, � .��' FAX NUMBER : 643-3462 "^ THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL MILLER ' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . AT ( 503 ) 644-6161 . MESSAGE , - -{ �+C��- 14 ``____,_ Viertry # OF PAGES : , (INCLUDING COVER S:-E`-'T ) P.O. BOX 217 • BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075-0217 • (503) 644-6161 MAR 28 '00 10:02AM MILLER'S P. 1 'J Date : Dear Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed development at __....1_Qf. '..5__...... . ..?___4 �e.'� .._ _.._... and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : Lid 7 Vii' / I►I►.�.4.. • 7`I 4e, / /. , £;� ' /' r -- i`i �'�{_� rFS�-'4�."7r�.[`•.y , , r /2"6" O/J1 4k. 4 a i�, (4,1y. Ar,-/ Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC. L+ '" -Jam[/ �� /7//ge FF �, I- Please_ ROUTING & REQUESTS P/Read To: all ❑ Handle IL4 Approve �t }, �,\ar a5 Sv1,rv.:v\ed And... a Ak cxk .SC-"Icrr.� ❑ Forward , v■off V--Return Vu. l I Keep or Recycle IAoSoo U Review with Me From: Tv/9 / jdik ( ) Date: /7 7- o0 Post-itO 7664©3M 1995 s -5c'LJ c l Wart�� gam, OM. Ric-ts : SD R C i vAk.,\--t cr.. ay.A # --11A-k3 s b; bcsz Rc t v-t k c o f o (4 1- i o t4s ,,.Q_ 1-k- is 415 i co,-- b i 1c s 3 b l� ate.- �S, U `�C, SeA Cwa f,2vv, ,CD, r a¢ b`(r.A }a ,9.r a c- C1t W ∎LA C`ky S Q t kC CA�E, (PIS , h k t r:, w v v J4 e".-eN� ( b d p.- CA . ��� r ��lr-� - e A . �i ( b )L 1cs1A„ ti.ks o is �u., w.a� S� � 4,. c c 4 ►s ►� 5 r. �� � +kJ-, G.Ss but if\-?i Ut4 \A,. , 'p Lc Cis aNr- 5A- ov1/4r 01,1„ 1_ . G62t � - Y�h�l. �\4 '�I�-U a �k S T r L. c� \j N U Sk �e C`te a,1,(!y.. Sd3 -`1 oDvTAN4y-34f cow-en 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 ,• , Kay Park 2000 ... . Recreation , . ..,:.,„:„.„.. . ..,. ...._, .... ... ...,.4 ,_...„ _..... „L,..., . - _..........—— - .4y,A,,,..°.s,.....4.....' , 4'.) '..i .........„ _.......,, - -..-„--..... -----, IZSZ , . Pg.3 ....- A, 4 no ■ . , - - , '`•, . .....-,............."- , ... . .. ' 1 I :46.. . Pg.15 , ;g7.13- , • :::7;....:':'-.•: ..L. . -1211110111111; i / , .. * .,. . ---___ 1..:,,I;P - .. .., _..... ..,...-.z.40,, , ...., ' _..‘..- 1 .. ..9. ... . ., . ., . ., AP ,. . . !Pg.1 7 t - - 11ea ! . . . J —'1...,,'ic,411 .i -* .- 't-.:1:-...5C - - — ,.. 1 4L t ---- sellir • - - - Iiiimair; .„,„.- ........." - . • . _ , illismimmaimoihmer 71-1iiNTAI.C1.1 :, _ . -1, .0' Pg ,... , . ' Finest" "America s Finest Park Equipment Since 1954! p • i .ri 1 BIKE RACKS 1 5/8" O.D. LOOP STYLE BIKE RACK - has the popular modern design and is economically priced. Made of 1 5/8"O-D.schedule 40 pipe,these units come with either a hot-dip galvanized finish,or powder coated in black, blue, red,yellow,or green. Custom colors are available to match your surroundings.Comes as either an in-ground mount or with flanges for surface mounting. (The number of spaces is figured at one bicycle per loop and one at each end.) Galvanized Powder Coated IN GROUND GALVANIZED IN GROUND POWDER COATED Model Length Spaces Loops Wt. Price Model Length Spaces Loops Wt. Price 613G1G 39" 5 3 28 lbs. $158.00 613CIG 39" 5 3 28 lbs. $192.00 f 615GIG 64" 7 5 43 lbs. $204.00 615CIG 64" 7 5 43 lbs. $260.00 617G1G 88" 9 7 59 lbs. $272.00 617C1G 88" 9 7 59 lbs. $340.00 1' 619GIG 113" 11 9 86 lbs. $341.00 619CIG 113" 11 9 86 lbs. S408.00 i f Galvanized Powder Coated ., '� ir++ I SURFACE MOUNT GALVANIZED IllatilliMIMA. DER COATED Il gillk'"mik ;fir•..: Model Length Spaces Loops Wt. Price I Model Length .paces Wt. Price - 4 p r' 613GSM 39" 5 3 36 lbs. $192.00 613CS 39" 5 36 lbs. S226.00 !' S ,.1����� 615GSM 64" 7 5 51 lbs. $238.00 6 M 64" 5 51 lbs. $294.00 ''�-iy i -" pl 617GSM 88" 9 7 66 lbs. $306.00 617CSM 88" 9 7 66 lbs. $374.00 i/:,,,-..--.-- -.414..- . 619GSM 113" 11 9 82 lbs. 5375.00 619CSM 113" 11 9 82 lbs. $442.00 �r -- y1r'sAe+� is}:400 .. ..).ii.' 4 • 1 jif �. • .04 1477: • tel is made of 2 3/8"O.D. schedule 40 ailable.Comes as either an in-ground .) • • •a. kNAL1 5 s ?r, •, • 3 00 s • it 0 Srfe5 C041710 r‘ 4 (t Cu nk gam, OM. iii►3/ I ibte_ T`N 1e can a^,.-. k'a^C . e e` b s.„4 y I 'oaf vf.,A,„ 1 4 Avk —Mitt sP p e C ffr'` '� ►�-c�e�-� y a e �}-• bps Jo 0 J- S: 1j Su a •-■ t; 0-e4. t Nl,.,,,r o f t Ak t -li■rS S'AQ - 4-0 --t\,.4,9- ,F,,.44 S -1} , $ h r- MA + r\ S12r 11-‹ . 1.?/ \O 't MID \rt‘S} ) A\I'-j ks\ I }'J - i b 0 j n L - G -.. 20/20 EYE CARE PROFESSIONALS TIGARD PLAZA, SUITE 248 11945 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TELEPHONE 674-1410 t /14 i • •. •• , •artil,, , . 1 :I, , ' . <4,1; 44 i .., , ,,,,f_..„ - 2....,,,%,„4., -1. • - , ;it, j, .IN G. p ry'' . r r 4►yA i i i ‘0, ��TTT• ' '� „'.s am •` f 511 - 4A-( 9 .0 * rt-.t._ ._ /". • -....,..,............• .•- ... , •• • - . et. _--it.‘ .:--,:t. s . J. • r.,........4.14....:, , .. Cr‘\ 'a . 1,.. '1-*-• 2 . . . It. 1 ''. . ... *., - r' .r.7•!t 41"'- 'n - ..... -'at - -- ' I•I • HO- '. ;..,." ••• U,4 i■ ' 1'•- ' *4'. 7 ..;' . -.44411C. 7--.1.. . Mo - .• V'!pt. • .., . .. ... ... ...,.. ... T. • . - ''.. . ': "' •;1•:-::.. , , ...-.•../,...-4, , 4 't . •Or.44:-. A.!' • . . ,.A .4i• - ....__ ..,.."....;,... ,:...,L‘', .,,il . .......a. i ' '--. 14- -, ' f - t..k' A . , lik N , , ,.( w- II. ' lllrl " 4c , r ,�, v. . filar 4.' i .1.11. 7 - • Ns. -* I i 4 in-l- • :ill- : P. 4. r Iy i ,: `1 ti ► '" e /Aye , may` I ` ~1•`-- • • 1.-f`� . �./ t I .`�.4 Y ,. 0 • • .d ,, w. r C>' • t:Cs, Project: REDWOOD CENTER Land use case. oDr i 999-00017 Site Address: 10125 SW HALL BLVD. Status as of: Nov 29, 2000 Contact: Wayne L Gerig Prepared by: Sherman Casper Phone 503 579-0203 Phone 503 639-4171 ext. 322 Fax 503 579-5066 Fax 503 598-1960 1 .Plans examiner Bob Poskins has received notification from Eric Macmillan that fire hydrates are in place and tested. 2.Condition #6 Bike rack, has been Met. 3. Condition #13 Lighting plan, has been Met. 4. The ODOT permit will be needed to cut and patch Hall Blvd. At this time I am not sure if a Street Opening permit from the City will be required per SDR Condition #15 or only a sewer connection permit from USA. I will ask Brian Rager to clarify this point. Requirements prior to issuing Site/Building permit. SDR Condition of Approval # 1 Modify Landscape Plan to show no vegetation in visual clearance (Planning issue) # 3 Modify Landscape Plan to show removal of trees closest to drive (Planning issue) #18 Obtain OR Hwy Permit for ROW Work provide Copy to City Eng. (Eng. issue) + Items listed in plan review letter from Bob Poskin 10-4-00 Fees required prior to issuing Site/Building permit. NOTE: Please provide Sherman Casper an estimate of the number of employees that will work in this building. This is needed to calculate Park system development charges. Permit fees are can not be calculated until plan review is complete Permit technician will notify contact person when total permit fees are calculated after plan review is complete. Building permit fees: Not known at this time, permit technician will notify contact person when permit fees are calculated after plan review is complete. Requirements before Cert. Of Occupancy can be issued: Condition of Approval: In addition to all condition for Site and Building permits # 23 Complete work in public ROW (Eng. issue) #24 Confirm water quality is in compliance (Building issue) #25 Overhead utility lines (Eng. issue) #26 Tree removal (Planning issue) + Traffic Impact Fees paid ($16,627) + All outstanding fees paid + All related permits passed final inspections 3/11/02. , Conditions P )ciated with Case #: SDR1l .00017 1 ��eres., 11:00:19 AM 99' Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0090 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Met 12/11/00 BDR 12/11/00 BDR 15. Prior to issuance of a site and/or building permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer connection in SW Hall Boulevard. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. (NOTE: Applicant did not need to obtain a permit from the City. All sewer work was done inside a USA easement and was permitted by USA). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO READ 0 Met 12/11/00 BDR 12/11/00 BDR 16. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. (NOTE: See note under#15). 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 11/9/00 BDR 11/9/00 BDR 17. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 0114 OBTAIN OR HWY PERMIT FOR ROW WORK 0 Met 12/11/00 BDR 12/11/00 BDR 18. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW)of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 0001 ADDITIONAL ROW 0 Met 10/23/00 BDR 10/23/00 BDR 19. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division,along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information,contact Rick Reeves,Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland,OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 0001 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT 0 Met 9/26/00 JPH 9/26/00 JPH 20. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit,the applicant shall grant an ingress/egress easement to the owner of Tax Lot 1900(1S135AA)to allow for a future crossover drive aisle connection between the two properties. The general location of the easement should be to the south of the proposed building location. 0001 PERMIT/WATER CONNECTION 0 Met 11/9/00 BDR 11/9/00 BDR 21. The application shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. 0041 H2O QUAL FAC INSTALLED ON SITE 0 Met 11/9/00 BDR 11/9/00 BDR 22. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No.96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brain Rager)for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 0001 WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 Not Met 12/22/99 ST 23. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way and obtain approval from the Engineerig Department. 0001 USA 0 Not Met 12/22/99 ST 24. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 0001 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0 Met 3/8/02 DCP 3/8/02 PLN 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,the amount will be$5,665 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. Page 2 of 3 Page 1 of 1 Parcel 1S135AA-01901 for Redwood Center(SDR1999-00017)was issued an incorrect address of 10125 SW Hall Blvd. The corrected address is 10225 SW Hall Boulevard. Please make all necessary changes to any permits, files, etc. Thank you. `1 / I b rk),) o �c. \% I/ file:/'C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00001.HTM 1/18/02