Loading...
SDR1999-00023 SDR1999 - 00023 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION a NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00023 CITYOFTIGARD HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION Community2�e Comment S�u:pin�A Better Comommunity 120 DAYS = 4/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR1999-00023 Adjustment (VAR) VAR1999-00031 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to construct an additional 51 parking spaces on a vacant lot adjacent to the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the width of an access way when more than 100 parking spaces are provided since the existing driveway currently serves more than 100 spaces. APPLICANT: Mike Nendelisky and Kris Landahl OWNER: LN Properties, LLC 8234 SW 252" 11475 SW Hall Boulevard Gresham, OR 97080 Tigard, OR 97223 ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lot 01500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 1 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023N A R 1999-00031 ND V CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan clearly showing a difference in building materials or pavement markings where the walkway crosses the driveway entrances. 2. Provide documentation (via recorded documents) showing an access easement is provided for the property to the north allowing for future connection to the existing parking lot. This documentation may show the easement either in the location of the existing driveway to the residence or through the proposed parking lot. If the easement is through the proposed parking lot, the site plan must be modified to show such. Documentation must also be submitted showing the existing access easement for the subject property. 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows a 10-20 foot buffer will be provided in accordance with landscaping and buffering standards of Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 adjacent to the existing residence on the property north of the subject site. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed consistent with the dimensional revisions required by other conditions in this decision without additional Planning Division approval. 4. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows one (1) additional parking lot tree will be provided adjacent to the eastern row of parking spaces (adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard). 5. The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the a- foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard, including the driveway and sidewalk construction. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 8. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 9. The applicant's construction plans shall show that the existing shared driveway from SW Hall Boulevard will be widened to provide a left turn lane with a storage length of 75 feet, as measured from the new right-of-way line. 10. The applicant's construction plans shall reflect that the easternmost entrance into the parking lot will be posted "Do Not Enter", "Exit Only". HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 2 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 11. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 13. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,063 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 14. All site improvements shall be installed as per the approved plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The tax lot being developed is currently vacant. A search of City records indicates that no development applications have been reviewed or approved for this property. The lot to be developed will serve as an overflow parking lot for the Hall Corporate Center which received development approval in 1997 (SDR 97-0014). Vicinity Information: The site is located off of SW Hall Boulevard. There is an existing access drive adjacent to the site that provides access to the Hall Corporate Center, the Swami Viswa Temple and the Kindercare Daycare Center. All of these parcels (to the north, south, and west of the subject site) are zoned C-P. The parcel to the north is currently developed with a single-family residence and is zoned C-P as well. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 51-space overflow parking lot to serve the existing Hall Corporate Center Parking lot. The applicant is also requesting a Variance to the access required when over 100 parking spaces are taking access off of it without a second access. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 3 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 • SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct an overflow parking lot for an existing office use. Offices are permitted in the C-P zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. Both the proposed parking lot construction on vacant property and the Variance requires a Type II administrative decision SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The following comments were received: The property owner directly north of the subject property wrote with concern that the development would preclude access to her lot for future development. Staff has considered this comment and a condition is needed to insure that access to adjacent lots be provided. This is discussed and conditioned under Access, Egress and Circulation. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-street Parking and loading requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) B. Specific SDR Approval Criteria C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards D. Impact Study SECTION VII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS: The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters;18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Land; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 4 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 Variances and Adjustments- Chapter 18.370: Variance to the access width: The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; The site has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. Because SW Hall Boulevard is an arterial street, access is limited and shared access is encouraged. The site has frontage on an existing access drive that is only 40 feet wide. The applicant has requested Variance approval to allow the construction of 51 additional parking spaces to take access off of an existing 30-foot-wide driveway that serves over 100 vehicles. The Code requires that when more than 99 parking spaces are provided, two, 30-foot-wide access drives or one, 50-foot-wide access drive must be provided. When the existing office complex (Hall Corporate Center) was constructed, a Variance was approved to the access width. Parking spaces were constructed and a joint parking agreement signed to share parking between the Hall Corporate Center and the adjacent Swami Viswa Temple. At that time, the subject property was owned by a separate individual and could not be considered as part of the development for the Hall Corporate Center. It is not possible to obtain access from another location other than Hall and it is preferable to take access off of the shared drive, therefore, this standard is satisfied. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; Because all the surrounding property is developed, there are no alternative access points to the site. The access separation requirements cannot be met; This standard does not apply because the requested variance does not involve access separation. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; The applicant has requested this adjustment to provide for needed parking for the existing business. It has been determined that the number of spaces being provided by this development is the minimum number needed to accommodate the existing demand. This is confirmed from site visits to the site which shows many cars are parked illegally on the access drive and on adjacent parcels. If the applicant were required to add additional width to the existing access to meet the 50 foot requirement and landscaping requirements, the number of parking spaces able to be constructed will be less than needed. The applicant has proposed to make improvements to help mitigate the impact of having only one access into the site by widening the pavement width to the 40 foot width required which will allow for three lanes. In addition, as discussed further in this decision under Street Utility and Improvement Standards, the revised access will provide for safe and efficient access and egress from the existing driveway. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and The driveway is existing. With the proposed improvements, the driveway will function better than under current circumstances. In addition, the construction of the parking lot will alleviate parking demands which often result in the illegal parking of cars along the access drive which further alleviates a very serious traffic safety hazard. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The visual clearance standards will continue to be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance standards are met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 5 OF 17 S D R 1999-000 23NA R 1999-00031 Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: Walkways: Section 18.705.030.F. states that walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's plan is for a parking lot only, however, a walkway is currently provided from the street along the access drive and connecting to the existing office building. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway will cross the driveways into the parking lot in 2 locations. The applicant's plans do not show a variation in building materials or striping to clearly identify the walkway. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The walkway is existing and currently paved with concrete. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 99 parking spaces is 1 50 foot wide access with 40 feet of pavement of 2 30 foot wide accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant has requested and, as discussed previously, is approved for a Variance to the access width for the existing access drive serving the parking lot and adjacent uses. Parking is already available within 50 feet of the building entrance, therefore, the 50-foot rule does not apply. Section 18.705.030.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The property to the north is currently developed with a single-family residence, but the zone is C-P. The applicant has indicated that the owner has access through the Hall Corporate Center parking lot and the existing access drive via an easement. Staff has concerns, however, that the existing easement is not wide enough to provide the required width if the property were developed independently as a commercial development. The applicant must submit evidence (via a recorded document) that the property to the north (tax lot 1600) has a minimum access width of 30 feet and unlimited access to use the existing access drive for any commercial development allowed in the underlying zone. If such a document does not exist, it must be granted or the proposed parking lot shall be modified to provide access to the property to the north and a joint access agreement provided. The easement must also acknowledge that the landscaping within the easement may be removed in order to construct the necessary parking lot connection. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 6 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 FINDING: Based on the analysis above the access, egress auld circulation standards have not been adequately addressed. If the applicant complies with the conditions below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan clearly showing a difference in building materials or pavement markings where the walkway crosses the driveway entrances. • Provide documentation (via recorded documents) showing an access easement is provided for the property to the north allowing for future connection to the existing parking lot. This documentation may show the easement either in the location of the existing driveway to the residence or through the proposed parking lot. If the easement is through the proposed parking lot, the site plan must be modified to show this. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street Trees: Section 18.745.040.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: • Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The existing driveway is greater than 100 feet in length. The applicant's landscape plans dated 7-30-99 provides flowering pear trees planted 30 feet on center. According to the Western Garden Book, this type of tree would be considered a medium sized stature tree, therefore, this standard is met. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of- way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned C-P adjacent to a residential use. Based on the buffer matrix, a 10-20 foot buffer is required between existing residential uses and parking lots with more than 50 parking spaces. The property to the north is a deep lot with the residence towards the western end of the lot. Because no additional residential uses will be constructed on the vacant portion of the lot, it is logical to require this buffer in the location of the residence only. The applicant's plans do not show a buffer will be provided adjacent to the existing residence, therefore, a condition is necessary. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed without additional Planning Division approval. Screening: Special Provisions Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 7 OF 17 SO R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and • The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that shows Blue Carpet Juniper, a lawn, and 2 London Plane trees will be installed along the frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. This shrub will provide a balance of vertical and low-lying shrubbery. The plan shows a tree will be installed every 7 spaces with the exception of the row of parking fronting along SW Hall Boulevard. An additional tree must be planted in this location. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.745, Buffering and Screening have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised landscape plan that shows a 10-20 foot buffer will be provided in accordance with landscaping and buffering standards of Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 adjacent to the existing residence on the property north of the subject site. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed, consistent with the dimensional revisions required by other conditions in this decision without additional Planning Division approval. • Submit a revised landscape plan that shows one (1) additional parking lot tree will be provided adjacent to the eastern row of parking spaces (adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard). Off-Street Parking and Loading Location: Section 18.765.030.B. states that off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the buildino, however uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The proposed parking lot is accessory to the main parking lot associated with the Hall Corporate Center Office building. The main lot, with shared parking has the required number of parking spaces for the use. Because the existing parking is above the required amount, this criterion does not apply. Wheel stops: Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 8 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NA R 1999-000 31 The site plan submitted aoes not show wheel stops will De provided adjacent to the landscaping. The plan indicates that there will be a 3-foot overhang into the landscaping area. While this is permitted, the landscaping provided adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard is required to provide screening and, therefore, can not meet the low growing requirements for landscaping to be part of the overhang. In addition, the landscape plan shows plants that tend to grow higher than 4 inches (the height of required wheel stops). The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the 3-foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N.1. States that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans show the spaces will be 9 feet by 18.6 feet. This dimension includes 3 feet of bumper overhand into the landscaping. As discussed above, the 3-foot bumper overhang, as shown, does not fully meet the standards. A condition has been imposed to modify the plan which will insure the space dimensions are met. The aisle widths are required to be 24 feet wide. Twenty-six (26) foot wide aisles are provided. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle-parking facilities should be provided under cover. Bike parking was addressed as part of the original SDR approval. Because no additional building space is proposed, this does not apply. Minimum and Maximum Off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Maximum parking for an office is 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The total square footage of the existing Hall Corporate Center is 32,735 square feet, therefore, the maximum parking spaces is 134. The applicant has a shared parking agreement with the property to the south (Swami Viswa Temple), however, there are only 74 parking spaces on the office site alone. Therefore, an additional 60 parking spaces could be provided before exceeding the maximum parking permitted for the existing office. Because the applicant is only proposing 51 this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading have not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, however, this standard will be met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 9 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 CONDITION:The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the 3-foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an existing conditions plan that shows there are no trees on the site, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal do not apply. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The plans do not show the vision clearance triangle. Staff scaled off the required dimensions and it appears that the vision clearance standards are met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. B. Specific SDR approval Criteria Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: Because the proposal does not involve a building, the proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment); 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.3 0.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi- family Use) 18.360.090.8 (Floodplain and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision or will be addressed further and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 10 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project ana did not provide any objections or concerns with the plan as proposed. FINDING: Because the Police Department has reviewed the project and did not indicate the need for any additional conditions on proposed lighting or crime prevention measures, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Hall which is on a Tri-met bus route. Staff sent notice and request for comments to Tn-met. No comments, objections or concerns were received. FINDING: Because Tri-met did not indicate the need for additional transit facilities, this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for the purpose of wholesale sales (with associated office and storage) and 20% retail sales. The proposed use (parking lot expansion for existing office use) is permitted uses within the Professional Commercial (C-P) zoning district (18.520). Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed project. As can be seen from the table below, the proposal fully complies. STANDARD C-P ZONE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sf 21,507 sf Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 75 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. [1] N/A -Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 0 ft. N/A -Side yard 0/20 ft. [2] N/A - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [2] N/A Maximum Height 45 ft. N/A Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 71% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% (after subtracting area of bumper overhang) [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.745 and 18.795 must be satisfied. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The table above shows that the proposal complies with the dimensional standards of the underlying zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 11 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and 12-foot travel lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide a minimum of 45 feet. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide this dedication. The dedication should be processed through ODOT, using their forms. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved to an interim width, with a pavement section of 25 feet from centerline to curb. There are no sidewalk improvements adjacent to this site. The applicant has indicated that they intend to construct a 6-foot sidewalk along the frontage of this site. They must also plant street trees along this frontage. In addition, there is an existing shared driveway located on the parcel immediately south of this site that serves the Kindercare, Swami Viswa Temple site and the current Hall Corporate Center. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study from Kittelson and Associates, dated September 13, 1999. Kittelson concluded that the addition of the parking spaces would have no adverse impact on the operations and safety of the existing driveway. The applicant's plan shows that they plan to widen the driveway to bring the width into closer compliance with TDC 18.705.030, which states a driveway serving more than 100 parking spaces should have a pavement width of 40 feet. The applicants' plan indicates that they plan to widen the entrance to provide a separate left turn lane. The overall paved width of the widened section would be 35 to 38 feet wide. The proposed length of left turn storage would be approximately 46 feet, as measured from the new ROW line. ODOT also submitted comments to the City concerning this application and they indicate two main concerns with the applicant's plan. The first concern is with the proposed left turn storage. ODOT recommends the applicant provide a minimum of 75 feet of storage, measured from the new ROW line. The second concern is with regard to the close proximity of the eastern access into the parking lot from the shared driveway. They are concerned that vehicles entering the parking lot from that entrance could back up into SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT and City staff met with the applicant on January 14, 2000, to discuss these issues. The applicant has now agreed to provide the 75-foot left turn storage length and will install signs at the eastern parking lot entrance to indicate "Do Not Enter", 'Exit Only". If the applicant will address these two issues, as they indicated in the meeting, both ODOT and City staff can recommend approval of the application. A condition of approval has been included with this recommendation to cover the two issues. The work in the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard must be covered in a permit issued by ODOT. This permit must be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A condition of approval has been included to require a new sidewalk along the frontage of this site. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 12 OF 17 S D R 1999-000 23NA R 1999-000 31 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No further public sanitary sewer modifications are necessary to support this project. Storm Drainage_ General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site will discharge into an existing private storm drainage line that flows to the south of this site. That system was intended to accommodate this site and the vacant parcel directly north of this site. No further upstream provisions are needed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide an onsite storm water detention pipe that will meet the provisions of the USA design standards. The preliminary calculations indicate the 36-inch pipe should have enough capacity to provide adequate detention for this site. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 13 OF 17 SDR1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 75 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $2,063. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS: Public Water System: No further public water system improvements are necessary to support this project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant has proposed to provide a Storm-Filter structure from Stormwater Management, Inc. to treat the onsite runoff. The preliminary calculations indicate that a 3-foot by 10-foot vault with one filter cartridge will sufficiently treat the runoff from this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 14 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Street Utility and Improvement Standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with Conditions 6-13 specified at the front of this decision, the standards will be fully met. D. Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. An impact study was provided for this development. As discussed previously under Street Utility and Improvement Standards, the applicant is proposing improvements that will mitigate any impacts created by the parking lot expansion including storm sewer, water quality, dedication along SW Hall Boulevard, and improvement to the driveway accessing the site. Because the applicant has shown that they will provide these needed improvements, staff can find that there will be no negative impacts to the public infrastructure as a result of this development. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division, Operations Utility Manager, Long Range Planning Division, Property Manager, and Crime Prevention Officer have reviewed the application and have indicated that they have no comments or objections to the proposal. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated in to the body of this decision. ODOT has had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comments: The proposed land use action is adjacent to Hal Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999) Hall Blvd. is classified as a District Urban highway facility. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient operation of this facility. We request that the following ODOT requirements be included as conditions of approval: 1. The access to Hall Blvd. shall be widened to 36 feet to provide for one incress lane and two egress lanes. The applicant shall obtain ODOT permits for all wort in the State right-of-way. Contact Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Permit Specialist, at 229-5002. All plans must be in metric. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 15 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 2. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition of the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable peak runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. The site plan shows two proposed accesses on the existing driveway access to Hall Blvd. for the proposed parking lot expansion. We are concerned that traffic may back up onto the highway with the location of the proposed east access' close proximity to the existing highway access. There is the potential for inbound traffic using the east access to queue back into the highway and impact the safe operation of this facility. The traffic study estimated that under the projected build-out conditions, the queue of eastbound vehicles exiting the site would be 100 feet (assuming one egress lane on the driveway approach) during the p.m. peak hour, which would hinder traffic movements to and from the day care center as well as the site traffic exiting from the proposed east access. To ensure the long term safe traffic operations of the highway at the existing driveway and to alleviate the vehicle queuing eastbound on the driveway approach, we recommend the City to include the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall provide separate right and left turn egress lanes of a minimum 75 feet in length (i.e. 75 feet from the proposed east property line) on the driveway approach. 2. The proposed east access shall be located at least 75 feet from the new east property line. Simon Eng, DOT Transportation Analyst, reviewed the proposed site plan and traffic study for the proposed parking lot expansion. If you have any questions regarding the technical comments, Mr. Eng can be reached at 731-8223. US West, TCI Cable, PGE, Tri-met, NW Natural Gas, and GTE, have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 25, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 16 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON FEBRUARY 8, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. January 24, 2000 PREPA"II BY: lia Hajduk DATE Associate Planner January 24, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe o DATE Planning Ma ger is\curpin\Julia\sdr\Hall Corp cntr prkg lot.doc HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 17 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 - I• . ® . ort ow mum ti ?>> I- Z in E F- ix Q a w 0 0 Z • �� z I ,D• , nonce D z ECIDUO°' •• woromr.111w 1 _ owu6weaH 1 ir v 1 L3- o �,111T111•21 s, Iv n.1.100 uy.nw rwa 10711 TO V 1 1 I • d,,,,,1'01n Mr .Q f• o�ro1 wmraut Mt �1 �• g M ii ■•.1 ►0/0100 Y•.a1 MO.0011 W 0/o s0/..7w.1e % r • !1 • Q Y1KTll a. IE! .•�� 'i■ YM-O fA]01l1 p1!\�-- 0/.n _ V II g 11 NI 41 la` Cling n�Ioc.�R Nsacn �-----........----- • o. 1 1a10 ■w-n7'W'w 7s7..Y - 0 i■■■,1-712d ..;,.,1,.■■■■■■■■■■.■.■■■■■■■■■i■■■■ ■■■■�.,.,1I -- Assi,;:,.uu-A c/) 1' `x1 mm :, •$'m`..l`M a I. 1 • 11b.�1 1.crU b 1 WO.IKON .11.-71 uRao o - 0 110/11 721.01 1 i___ _+ _ _ -___ f -- -_- „1.71- - =/ 1 1 I I r ____i .1 4D SITE PLAN t HALL CORPORATE CTR. EXHIBIT MAP N SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 (map is not to scale) - ' ,__ CITY of TIGARD :I '"—' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM E ST Iii- Q I 1,SPR�JCE ST VICINITY MAP Illikhk RANI- u • rwiiiiIi1II?1I__a 1i SDR 1999-00023 r- IIIIIIII -L'--- WPIP os a � VAR 1 999-0003 II` arm HALL �ENWIII — _ _ _ �r� �;��;�� CORPORATE ------ MI LIIIIII1 iii NM CENTER II �� I 7111:mm.lai PARKING LOT lQI_ 3 S BJEC 6 � �,,MIMI ADDITION L _III— .- -,\ LE IT 1.- • ip 'a , 111111,11e■I" i b"..1- :I- / ' , a o r m _, .. '141111111‘ 0 ,t? LOMITA N..ELA I /.., ' L iitalj Q . . . 0 200 400 600 Feet ' t•=476 feet 0 ill t# • ,.� ♦m t 0 4 i A City of Ti and P 1 WW��. ,' ' G Infomwtion on this map is for general location only and 1 `, 4. ,' should be verified with the Development Services Division. ' �' , -, 13(50 SW Hall Blvd ' P,=�-, - AMT.--AI Tigard,OR 97223 'O`_.__ O_ _ (503)639171 'S{•_� http7fwww.ci.tigard.onus Community Development Plot date: Dec I 7, I 999;C:ImagigMAGICO3.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 41, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00023 CITY OF TIGARD HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION pin�Cora A Betraun t(DterCeve(opment Shaommunity 120 DAYS = 4/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR1999-00023 Adjustment (VAR) VAR1999-00031 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to construct an additional 51 parking spaces on a vacant lot adjacent to the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the width of an access way when more than 100 parking spaces are provided since the existing driveway currently serves more than 100 spaces. APPLICANT: Mike Nendelisky and Kris Landahl OWNER: LN Properties, LLC 8234 SW 252' 11475 SW Hall Boulevard Gresham, OR 97080 Tigard, OR 97223 ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lot 01500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 25, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON FEBRUARY 8, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. J ; ___.. .6. :71111XMLI,..1.1111Thige . — —: = 1 I I_I+44.--W--.,---- ...,-.411:---,-t--=...-..--',. . , L.,_, _ i I 0D SITE PLAN I HALL CORPORATE CTR. EXHIBIT MAP N SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00071 ism*win t1 I I I I I i l I__I_I I I .,......,.,......,,.."..... ■... ,�� 1 VICINITY MAP m'���� .IiZ�/1�111111 "'E� �1 ��/� i SDR1999-00023 �•1116 l' ` :AI I r : . �`p SD VAR 1999-00031 -la s!, it HALL .12:ri ` N C mon MI=-MN CORPORATE 1111011111•111111� '! i Ma Z MI CENTER 11 11■ N: m■ m� \r I'I: - NI mom PARKING LOT p . —p m SUBJEC � Erma ADDITION 1 in -=;_I SITE ■ ,I]. ' --prim in iv .. • I.A l INS ��`� -N ■ ii;41 1.. we: razz-I in tv "lik VI .0 , po. :! .* • IMihir NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN, .DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION ►� SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CIT Te OF Y OF TIGARD Community cDeveCopment Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: December 21 , 1999 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00023 VARIANCE [VAR] 1999-00031 FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 4, 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner, in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addre ne relevant approval criteria with ,icient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ■ .■ ti I LiJ__I 1_ CITY O... U 1 ■_ VICINITY MAP I■■III ) 'r p' •ST It,, \ - SDR1999 00023 ■Lc -"����1� I � j�� VAR1999-00031 �� ■ MOM ■s`■ ` - CORPORATE - ■�TG■1■■■�� NLIIII '■ CE NT E R 00 I ' -■ C■ ma � �.._� PARKING LOT ���� =-'ENE SITE TEJEC_ ADDITION IN ■_ -,� ikaE F____, ■t • _ LNG- II MI WOE MS N��= .mom 4i a =E = Ma 1 ■ ........0 'Illiiiiiik 0 ►���■- t! 1111 ,r Mi tVIII _ /� . � _ cOT A N . vf � l � !" !: 4r._ ♦ 90 V\ c.,of Tierd REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A;;- ;;- 1 . re on Department of Transportation drµ 0...c 1 Region 1 • John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 January 10, 2000 FPLA911 -22A-2A -141 Proposal Number: 390 City of Tigard RECEIVED PLANNING Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. JAN 1 1 2000 Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Julia Hajduk Subject: SDR1999-00023NAR199-00031 Hall Corporate Center Parking, Lot Addition Hall Blvd. X OR 217 Dear Ms. Hajduk, The proposed land use action is adjacent to Hall Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999) Hall Blvd is classified as a District Urban highway facility. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient operation of this facility. We request that the following ODOT requirements be included as conditions of approval: 1. The access to Hall Blvd. shall be widened to 36' to provide for one ingress lane and two egress lanes. The applicant shall obtain ODOT permits for all work in the State right of way. Contact Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Permit Specialist, at 229-5002. All plans must be in metric. 2. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable peak runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. The site plan shows two proposed accesses on the existing driveway access to Hall Blvd. for the proposed parking lot expansion. We are concerned that traffic may back up onto the highway with the location of the Form 734-1850(1/98) City of Tigard: SDR1999-00023N: Hall Corporate Center Parking Lot Addition 01/10/00 ODOT Response Page 2 proposed east access close proximity to the existing highway access. There is the potential for inbound traffic using the east access to queue back into the highway and impact the safe operation of this facility. The traffic study estimated that under the projected build-out conditions, the queue of eastbound vehicles exiting the site would be 100 feet (assuming one egress lane on the driveway approach) during the p.m. peak hour, which would hinder traffic movements to and from the day care center as well as the site traffic exiting from the proposed east access. To ensure the long term safe traffic operations of the highway at the existing driveway and to alleviate the vehicle queuing eastbound on the driveway approach, we recommend the City include the following as a conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall provide separate right and left turn egress lanes of a minimum 75 feet in length (i.e. 75' from the proposed east property line) on the driveway approach. 2. The proposed east access shall be located at least 75 feet from the new east property line. Simon Eng, ODOT Transportation Analyst, reviewed the proposed site plan and traffic study for the proposed parking lot expansion. If you have any questions regarding the technical comments, Mr. Eng can be reached at 731-8223. Please forward the Notice of Decision with conditions of approval when it has been issued. I can be reached at (503) 731-8258. Thank you for providing notification of this proposal. Sincerely, 1 /1 iviarah Danielson Planner Development Review cc: Simon Eng, ODOT Region 1 Sam Hunaidi, Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A MD: pk -/6 eon "4-1-144-ki ./71-1-rreL401 r u1-4,1*-p iaLeti4/4_,c1 4 zles - -- /)vi--v 4,4 , 7 I Mrs. Mary Brazil P.O.Box 23064 I Tigard,OR 97281-3064 RECEIVED PLANNING DEC 3 0 1999 CITY OF TIGARD I Mrs. Mary Brazil TS P.O. Box 23064 Tigard,OR 97281-3064 j 7 To 6 ,Stai,-/(1)_ /1,,—°/147" r j. Xfl a. d , • . a--/ 111-1 L6 .),,, La 14,,Los, f"- __Lii 41,,, _ 1 a - . ) 4.- -� I , . 1 4i, ,) _11,;,,..,"„j, ----htenHa4„-1.1 0_ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: January 18, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer - - RE: SDR 1999-00023, Hall Corporate Center Parking Lot Addition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and 12-foot travel lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide a minimum of 45 feet. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide this dedication. The dedication should be processed through ODOT, using their forms. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved to an interim width, with a pavement section of 25 feet from centerline to curb. There are no sidewalk improvements adjacent to this site. The applicant has indicated that they intend to construct a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 1 6-foot sidewalk along the frontage of this site. They must also plant street trees along this frontage. In addition, there is an existing shared driveway located on the parcel immediately south of this site that serves the Kindercare, Swami Viswa Temple site and the current Hall Corporate Center. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study from Kittelson and Associates, dated September 13, 1999. Kittelson concluded that the addition of the parking spaces would have no adverse impact on the operations and safety of the existing driveway. The applicant's plan shows that they plan to widen the driveway to bring the width into closer compliance with TDC 18.705.030, which states a driveway serving more than 100 parking spaces should have a pavement width of 40 feet. The applicants' plan indicates that they plan to widen the entrance to provide a separate left turn lane. The overall paved width of the widened section would be 35 to 38 feet wide. The proposed length of left turn storage would be approximately 46 feet, as measured from the new ROW line. ODOT also submitted comments to the City concerning this application and they indicate two main concerns with the applicant's plan. The first concern is with the proposed left turn storage. ODOT recommends the applicant provide a minimum of 75 feet of storage, measured from the new ROW line. The second concern is with regard to the close proximity of the eastern access into the parking lot from the shared driveway. They are concerned that vehicles entering the parking lot from that entrance could back up into SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT and City staff met with the applicant on January 14, 2000, to discuss these issues. The applicant has now agreed to provide the 75-foot left turn storage length and will install signs at the eastern parking lot entrance to indicate "Do Not Enter", "Exit Only". If the applicant will address these two issues, as they indicated in the meeting, both ODOT and City staff can recommend approval of the application. A condition of approval has been included with this recommendation to cover the two issues. The work in the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard must be covered in a permit issued by ODOT. This permit must be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A condition of approval has been included to require a new sidewalk along the frontage of this site. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 2 revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No further public sanitary sewer modifications are necessary to support this project. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site will discharge into an existing private storm drainage line that flows to the south of this site. That system was intended to accommodate this site and the vacant parcel directly north of this site. No further upstream provisions are needed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 3 that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide an onsite storm water detention pipe that will meet the provisions of the USA design standards. The preliminary calculations indicate the 36-inch pipe should have enough capacity to provide adequate detention for this site. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 4 There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 75 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,063.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS: Public Water System: No further public water system improvements are necessary to support this project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant has proposed to provide a Storm-Filter structure from Stormwater Management, Inc. to treat the onsite runoff. The preliminary calculations indicate that a 3-foot by 10-foot vault with one filter cartridge will sufficiently treat the runoff from this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 5 Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1 . Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Hall Boulevard, including the driveway and sidewalk construction. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 3. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 6 Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 4. The applicant's construction plans shall show that the existing shared driveway from SW Hall Boulevard will be widened to provide a left turn lane with a storage length of 75 feet, as measured from the new right-of-way line. 5. The applicant's construction plans shall reflect that the easternmost entrance into the parking lot will be posted "Do Not Enter", "Exit Only". 6. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 7. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 8. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,063.00 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. \\tig333\usr\depts\eng\brianr\comments\sd r\sdr 7 999-00023.bdr.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00023 Hall Corp. Parking Lot PAGE 7 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 7 1999 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00023VARIANCE[VAR11999-00031 .-HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION,. REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: X We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P(ease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: k ,0- e-310 Phone Number[sl: -4 =�"` SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Dec-23-99 08: 33A TCI Si _Helens 503 397 5686 P .01 11"---I1 TCI RECEIVED PLANNING DEC 2 3 1999 • FAX COVER SHEET CITY OF TIGARQ DATE: / t.,;? 3 %n TIME: l�: �'j` `�` ,� /• - C T O: ' L,(cE£ 7.../e 4,..4.-cc .i � �a . �..(1-‹� 6-cl.,)/-i` ezi- ', :_.--hjia----- -.' - j ..—/C:,/:-Z. ri•-.)--L, ' 7.). /-cie‘,---A L., ...7 .... . . , „ ,-- , • ,/ I 4' FROM i C '7W'Z/C., i r-iTk'rl-11l ( J ' TUALATIN VALLEY 14200 S .W. BRIGADOON CT. BEAVERTON , OREGON 97005 PHONE: ( 503) 605-4895 FAX: ( 503) 646-8004 NUMBER OF PACES IN THIS .', TRANSMISSION INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET : NOTES : TCI of Tualatin Valley. Inc. 14200 S.W.Brigadoon Court Beaverton.OR 97005 (503)605-4805 FAX;503)646-8004 An Ecuai O.porrur y E nn oy u Dec-23-99 08: 33A TCI - _ Helens 50? 397 5686 P. 02 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD ( W711114 Mt)X1.1,^(rli)hmrn1 ,SYa wing -1;Belter('umuruiir1y DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Pat McGann,Tel Cabieuision of Oregon FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-41111 Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)1999-00023VARIANCE[VAR11999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION. REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximityi to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community' Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4 (N1,•asi'provide 1fl/1IIo 'm Viirmafrwr)Name of Persons)Commenting: / >f�7 /Vr Phone Number(sl: ( c 5- — 1/e?„5,22 I SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT AnnITrOrl RFr1I ICCT ceICA!`rI■ApACAITC 4. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OF TI4 QU GARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community GATE: December 21,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Lori Dorney,US West Communications DEC 2 7 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (5031639-41M/Fax: 15031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 1999-00023VARIANCE(VAR11999-00031 >HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. — Written comments provided below: rne ti (Pa:Ise provide the forrowing information)Name of Person(s1 Commenting: z_t!2.7 !Phone Number(sl: 24)-7. 4/44 I SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A. CITY OF TIGARD Community,Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program n , JAN 0 7 20 1 - FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 2 1999 J CITY OF TIGA STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-7297 � - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00023VARIANCE[VAR11999-00031 >HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v ti (Please provide the forrowing information)Name of Person's)Commenting . - ) S Ov Phone Number(s): o 4- SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A . UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM RECEIVED �tWG JAN 0 2000 DATE: January 5, 2000 CfTY OF 7 p�pN SIrAHD TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman,USA J x SUBJECT: Hall Corporate Center Parking Lot Addition, SDR 1999-00023, VAR 1999-00031 STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44 or amendments. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI i ARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Michael MillerLOperations Utility Manager RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 9 1999 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00023VARIANCE IVAR11999-00031 .-HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: -r /, Dc-</t- ( I4 TcI- 1/CE G-oN T.ar r /LtAG,•'ri.J viWerr Glare-X 1 ti (Please pravufe the follOunng information)Name of Personlsl Commenting: Mir jid2,71, I Phone Nomberlal: SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 414 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI OF IIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Nadine Smith,Advanced Planning Supervisor DEC 2 7 1999 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00023VARIANCE(VAR11999-00031 >HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v 1 (P1iase provide the foffiyiving information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Number(s): 1 SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS dTha.“ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF Ail Community cDevetopment Shaping,a Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 7 1999 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner CU Y OF WARD Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 1999-00023VARIANCE(VAR11999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: tk P,zorsa . A- suss, a pews nla 4 sae bore-D S-' f?d,47 v (E1 ase pravufe the foffowing information)Name of Person's)Commenting: l m5K t.J I Phone Number[sl: X12 I SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.O A. IIGARD Community Development Shaping fetter Community DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 3 1999 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00023VARIANCE IVAR11999-00031 >HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION.< REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v ti Please provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: S Voovc I Phone Number[sl: \,9A-■-t°■61-1 y. 220_ I SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYeTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 !/,+ TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department , `N/ll RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division DEC 2 2 1999 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00023VARIANCE(VAR11999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Halll Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 14 �► (lease provide the foffowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: -- I Phone Number[sl: SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community,Devefopment Shaping Better Community DATE: December 21,1999 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORT 1999-00023VARIANCE[VAR11999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500 ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: January 4, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ti (P1 ase provide the following information)Name of Person's)Commenting: I Phone Number's): I SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR COIYINTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CI Area: [CI [El [S[ [Wl CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 0 Place for review in Library CMTeookts) 1FILE NOESI.: D 2-3 FILE NAMEESI: // err ,vr, CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,super,... _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./o,1pmm svgs Technicians l-P'OLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,crime Prevent..on..., _-_-BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Burdmgonnul L— ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,odpmnt Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,uwh.nManag., CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,otyRecorder =OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Propertylaanaoer _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* V UALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* 4"--UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON +* _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton.OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth ManagementCoo,dinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French PO Box 2946 CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY * King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Power5nes in Area) OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Scott King(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) v_Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Jim Tice(ICA) David Knowles,Planning Bureau on Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Tom Harry(General Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Forth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Phil Healy(General Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Sr.Cartographer Portland,OR 97204 _Jim Nims(zcA)Ms 15 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burl■ngton Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS c ?CI CABLEVISION OF OREGON :%TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann if Project a Within Y.Mlle of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY --GENERAL TELEPHONE WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _ICI CABLE(Apps E.of Hall/N of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/All CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h.\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification Lrst.doc (Revised: 2-Nov-99) r � . - NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! J � CI Y of GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - o NOTIFICATION 111 2 AREA MAP 131350300700 (5 0 0') 0313 5 040 05 00 Cr- 151350302000 Q131350302803 1513608003 v► 157350302801 101350001900 Q031350362°02 PFAFFLE 151350003500 11n;n 1 For Kerry Steinmetz 151350301800 �5D301000 ryry fidefit 151350302900 131350603060/S1350003618 151350001001 National Title Co. 151360000300 - 131360600400 Re: IS 135 A, 01500 _ /S17s030n00 151i5�301200 —7 �1S135M03012! 1517501103503\-, 1, _ 1Dg511036N oa o SUBJECT 7S175M07001 -'—'-- 1510501101600 , - —� 107700000301 utisnnalns� \ \ SITE lstas5DOi0os (4--7 e j'. 1505/103614 15105110130 151750301300 �-+ iS135DD09ip.., I 4- - _ f ` 1 IL>LI !! 151051101101 0.h/-A •�{��i-J 151350001601 101350003607Q, _ �— 151350003010 ZI OF 151350003608 ■ 151350003611 801350001800 131350001600 _ 151351107609 `------ 350003620 LOAAIT� __- 131350000100 �V� 1 151350003300 131350002000 Fr 101350007400 801350002001 1S1350001300 \ 731350003107 2 0 100 200 30.0 400 Feel W �� 1 261 legit a A' 41, Ilia .. 44t g 0 City of Tigard e• • Informa0on on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. te. 13125 Tigard,O Hall Blvd _ -�- - :/ww OR 97d.o (503)639.4171 httpJAvww639-171or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 1, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • 1S135DA-00500 1S135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1 S 135DA-01000 350A-01100 SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA FE' :•NALD M PO BOX 82549 PO :► ,•7 PORTLAND,OR 97282 T ARD,OR -81 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD,OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1S135DA-01500 5DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZ • NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD PO B• c•4 TIGARD,OR 97223 'ARD,OR 9 :1 1S135DA-01700 1S135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD,OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1S135DA-01801 1S135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 1S135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DA-02802 35DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE :I AN "HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 11300 'aTH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 IJ6"ARD,OR 9 ' 3 1S135DA-02900 1S135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • S135DA-03500 15135DA-03503 L ' -ROPE; S LLC BRA • APR • •NANDA ASHRAMA 1148 :■ HALL BLVD STE 100 11515 •'•••ALL BLVD ARD,O' •7223 TI ••D,OR • • 3 15135DD-00100 1S135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01400 1 S135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01601 1S135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 KANEOHE, HI 96744 1S135DD-02000 1 135DD-02001 BROWN MILTON 0 BRO'•• MI iN O 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 •c-OCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 WAUKIE,O' •7222 1S135DD-02100 1S135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135DD-03603 1 S 135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03605 1 S135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03607 1S135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B& FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135DD-03609 1S135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 • 1 S 135DD-03612 1 S 135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03614 1S135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135DD-03616 1S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1 S 135DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES,OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1 S 135DD-03703 1 S 136CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CC-00300 1 S 136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 136CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ti 10/01/99 FRI 12:07 FAX 503 7f '631 FIDELITY LDBS Z001 0 li Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon 27 September 1999 Patty Lunsford City of Tigard Re: Mailing label request Ms.Lansford: Attached please find the information on the subject property we are requesting mailing labels for. The address is 1 1475 SW IIall Blvd and the map and tax lot is 1S135DA-01500. Please call with any questions. Sincerel . .,, _ 17/fr Kerry Steinmetz Sr.Coordinator Land Develop)-nt Services 401 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE • PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-2273 TCT CDVnATT: «l11' 7'71_4114 • I TUT/ FAY /4(171 77Q11414 •TITT T FAX I411i1 777-8474 • -10101/99 FRI 12:07 FAX 503 7' 1631 FIDELITY LDBS Z 002 1 p 11111 Fidelity National Title Company ee The Closing Company Prepared For: Prepared By: OUR VALUED CUSTOMER!!! Information Services Department 401 SW Fourth Avenue - Portland,Oregon 97204 Phone:(503)227-LIST(5478) Fax: (503)274-5472 E-mail: csrequest @&tto.com OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner :Ln Properties Lk Ref Parcel Number : 1 S 135DA 01500 CoOwner 7:015 R:01 W S:35 Q:251 Site Address : 11475 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Parcel Number : R0275142 Mail Address : 11475 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Map Number . Telephone : Owner: Tenant: County : Washington(OR) _ SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Transferred : 04/26/1999 Loan Amount . Document# : 50279 Lender : • Sale Price :$190,000 Loan Type . Deed Type : Warranty Interest Rate . %Owned : 100 Vesting Type :Corporation PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page c&Grid : 655 F3 Mkt Land :S74,490 Census : Tract:309.00 Block: I Mkt Structure . Subdivision/Plat :Metzger Acres Other . Neighborhood Cd :ZPHY Mkt Total :$74,490 Land Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial %Improved . Legal :METZGER ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 23, 98-99 Taxes :$947.59 : ACRES.50 Exempt Amount : Exempt Type . Class Code : RI Levy Code :02381 Millage Rate : 152174 M50 Assd Value :$62,270 -, PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms Lot Acres : .50 Year Built : 1938 Bathrooms : Lot SqFt :21,780 Ef learBlt . Heat Method Bsm Fin SgFI Floor Cover . Pool : Bsm Urn SgFI : Foundation . Appliances : Bsm Low SqFt : Roof Shape . • Dishwasher Bldg SqFt . Roof Matl . Hood Fan 1st Fir SqFt InteriorMal . Deck Upper Fir SqFt Paving Mail Garage Type : Porch SqFt Const Type . • Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Deck SqFt . This title Information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions Intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate insureds_ Indiscriminate use only benefiting Intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. ' 10/01/99 FRI 12:08 FAX 503 7£ '631 FIDELITY LDBS Z003 25 203.96 1700 `� 10757 he N w '---- 0 .25 4C. y 3503 / �C .341.4c / 00 1./1 H OIL ti 1 e 00 0 a 1600 41„ 0 -0 , m �� 18aSr •�i .42 AC. o / r w � �. / 22 1400 3 ti 1 1mo 4 4F E Lg.' /.75Ac. . • p =0 '+1 w w 1500 1f \ 31= ' .50.4G. s, z 25+ _ _ 206.88 r f r V880* f, u x i`' or 900 U/, I 1 / 'EASEMENT 88.9619 N 1300 L J. L m 1401 za9.•5 ./0 AC o . . 23 60 I 0 4, 72Ac °• 00l _ _ _ — 3 .1/L _ — _ _ m 0 10-+.20 2. 0 c.s. 3oso 0 / 0 N Z o 291.77 0 o e.s X01.9 en w y S89°16 w 302.1 LI S N88°W 209.78 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSE 23e'78 6•$ DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY • 6 °Zf 491-1,744 /SEE MAP IS 1 35DD 42.0*_.01140. S'I c .s0,53 ...%.G • • ' A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING env OF TIGARD Community(Deve(opment Shaping,A Better Community STATE OAF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of'Tigard ) I, Shirley L. 'Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist Ifor the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appoprfale Box(s)Below) n NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: (Type:K,nC of Nooce) (File No./Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Period) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ® NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION FOR:. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION SDR1999-00023/VAR1999-00031 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearn,,1 ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council U NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) El City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on January 25. 2000, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 25. 2000, postage prepaid. 6at (Pe son that Prepared Notice) / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /S"' day of -)-1-1 a N c. �r , 20120 T., OFFICIAL SEAL � Lf.//�iLril/is7 j SHERMAN S.CASPER NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON � K-1,-'1' NOTARY EXPIRES AY 13,2 COMMISSION N0.323409 My Commission Expires: �! /3 2-/x1:3 MY COMMISSION D(PIRES MAY 13,2003 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 46, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00023 CITY YOF IIGARD rop HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION Communi B ettevCommunt SkapingA etterCmunity 120 DAYS = 4/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR1999-00023 Adjustment (VAR) VAR1999-00031 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to construct an additional 51 parking spaces on a vacant lot adjacent to the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the width of an access way when more than 100 parking spaces are provided since the existing driveway currently serves more than 100 spaces. APPLICANT: Mike Nendelisky and Kris Landahl OWNER: LN Properties, LLC 8234 SW 252nd 11475 SW Hall Boulevard Gresham, OR 97080 Tigard, OR 97223 ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135DA, Tax Lot 01500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 1 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 1 . Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan clearly showing a difference in building materials or pavement markings where the walkway crosses the driveway entrances. 2. Provide documentation (via recorded documents) showing an access easement is provided for the property to the north allowing for future connection to the existing parking lot. This documentation may show the easement either in the location of the existing driveway to the residence or through the proposed parking lot. If the easement is through the proposed parking lot, the site plan must be modified to show such. Documentation must also be submitted showing the existing access easement for the subject property. 3. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows a 10-20 foot buffer will be provided in accordance with landscaping and buffering standards of Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 adjacent to the existing residence on the property north of the subject site. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed consistent with the dimensional revisions required by other conditions in this decision without additional Planning Division approval. 4. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows one (1) additional parking lot tree will be provided adjacent to the eastern row of parking spaces (adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard). 5. The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the a- foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 6. Prior to issuance of the site and/or building permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way (ROW) of SW Hall Boulevard, including the driveway and sidewalk construction. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. 8. Additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). 9. The applicant's construction plans shall show that the existing shared driveway from SW Hall Boulevard will be widened to provide a left turn lane with a storage length of 75 feet, as measured from the new right-of-way line. 10. The applicant's construction plans shall reflect that the easternmost entrance into the parking lot will be posted "Do Not Enter", "Exit Only". HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 2 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 11 . Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 13. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,063 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 14. All site improvements shall be installed as per the approved plans. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The tax lot being developed is currently vacant. A search of City records indicates that no development applications have been reviewed or approved for this property. The lot to be developed will serve as an overflow parking lot for the Hall Corporate Center which received development approval in 1997 (SDR 97-0014). Vicinity Information: The site is located off of SW Hall Boulevard. There is an existing access drive adjacent to the site that provides access to the Hall Corporate Center, the Swami Viswa Temple and the Kindercare Daycare Center. All of these parcels (to the north, south, and west of the subject site) are zoned C-P. The parcel to the north is currently developed with a single-family residence and is zoned C-P as well. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 51-space overflow parking lot to serve the existing Hall Corporate Center Parking lot. The applicant is also requesting a Variance to the access required when over 100 parking spaces are taking access off of it without a second access. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 3 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct an overflow parking lot for an existing office use. Offices are permitted in the C-P zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. Both the proposed parking lot construction on vacant property and the Variance requires a Type II administrative decision SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The following comments were received: The property owner directly north of the subject property wrote with concern that the development would preclude access to her lot for future development. Staff has considered this comment and a condition is needed to insure that access to adjacent lots be provided. This is discussed and conditioned under Access, Egress and Circulation. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.370 Variances and Adjustments) 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.765 Off-street Parking and loading requirements) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) B. Specific SDR Approval Criteria C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards D. Impact Study SECTION VII. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS: The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.370, Variances and Adjustments; 18.390, Decision Making Procedures; 18.520, Commercial Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Street Parking; 18.790, Tree Removal; 18.795, Visual Clearance Areas; and 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards. The development standards and requirements of these chapters are addressed below, followed by the specific Site Development Review Criteria. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following chapters;18.400, Land Division; 18.600, Community Plan Area Standards; 18.710, Accessory Residential Units; 18.715, Density Computations; 18.720, Design Compatibility Standards; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.740, Historic Overlay; 18.742, Home Occupations; 18.750, Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations; 18.760, Nonconforming Situations; 18.775, Sensitive Land; 18.785, Temporary Uses; 18.797, Water Resources Overlay District; and 18.798, Wireless Communications Facilities. These chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 4 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 Variances and Adjustments- Chapter 18.370: Variance to the access width: The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment from the access requirements contained in Chapter 18.705, based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; The site has frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. Because SW Hall Boulevard is an arterial street, access is limited and shared access is encouraged. The site has frontage on an existing access drive that is only 40 feet wide. The applicant has requested Variance approval to allow the construction of 51 additional parking spaces to take access off of an existing 30-foot-wide driveway that serves over 100 vehicles. The Code requires that when more than 99 parking spaces are provided, two, 30-foot-wide access drives or one, 50-foot-wide access drive must be provided. When the existing office complex (Hall Corporate Center) was constructed, a Variance was approved to the access width. Parking spaces were constructed and a joint parking agreement signed to share parking between the Hall Corporate Center and the adjacent Swami Viswa Temple. At that time, the subject property was owned by a separate individual and could not be considered as part of the development for the Hall Corporate Center. It is not possible to obtain access from another location other than Hall and it is preferable to take access off of the shared drive, therefore, this standard is satisfied. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; Because all the surrounding property is developed, there are no alternative access points to the site. The access separation requirements cannot be met; This standard does not apply because the requested variance does not involve access separation. The request is the minimum adjustment required to provide adequate access; The applicant has requested this adjustment to provide for needed parking for the existing business. It has been determined that the number of spaces being provided by this development is the minimum number needed to accommodate the existing demand. This is confirmed from site visits to the site which shows many cars are parked illegally on the access drive and on adjacent parcels. If the applicant were required to add additional width to the existing access to meet the 50 foot requirement and landscaping requirements, the number of parking spaces able to be constructed will be less than needed. The applicant has proposed to make improvements to help mitigate the impact of having only one access into the site by widening the pavement width to the 40 foot width required which will allow for three lanes. In addition, as discussed further in this decision under Street Utility and Improvement Standards, the revised access will provide for safe and efficient access and egress from the existing driveway. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; and The driveway is existing. With the proposed improvements, the driveway will function better than under current circumstances. In addition, the construction of the parking lot will alleviate parking demands which often result in the illegal parking of cars along the access drive which further alleviates a very serious traffic safety hazard. The visual clearance requirements of Chapter 18.795 will be met. The visual clearance standards will continue to be met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the variance standards are met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 5 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 Access Egress and Circulation — Chapter 18.705: Walkways: Section 18.7O5.O3O.F. states that walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's plan is for a parking lot only, however, a walkway is currently provided from the street along the access drive and connecting to the existing office building. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway will cross the driveways into the parking lot in 2 locations. The applicant's plans do not show a variation in building materials or striping to clearly identify the walkway. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The walkway is existing and currently paved with concrete. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with more than 99 parking spaces is 1 50 foot wide access with 40 feet of pavement of 2 30 foot wide accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The applicant has requested and, as discussed previously, is approved for a Variance to the access width for the existing access drive serving the parking lot and adjacent uses. Parking is already available within 50 feet of the building entrance, therefore, the 50-foot rule does not apply. Section 18.7O5.03O.K.2. states that to eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide parking area connections. The property to the north is currently developed with a single-family residence, but the zone is C-P. The applicant has indicated that the owner has access through the Hall Corporate Center parking lot and the existing access drive via an easement. Staff has concerns, however, that the existing easement is not wide enough to provide the required width if the property were developed independently as a commercial development. The applicant must submit evidence (via a recorded document) that the property to the north (tax lot 1600) has a minimum access width of 30 feet and unlimited access to use the existing access drive for any commercial development allowed in the underlying zone. If such a document does not exist, it must be granted or the proposed parking lot shall be modified to provide access to the property to the north and a joint access agreement provided. The easement must also acknowledge that the landscaping within the easement may be removed in order to construct the necessary parking lot connection. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 6 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 FINDING: Based on the analysis above the access, egress and circulation standards have not been adequately addressed. If the applicant complies with the conditions below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Prior to issuance of site development or construction permits, the applicant must submit a revised site plan clearly showing a difference in building materials or pavement markings where the walkway crosses the driveway entrances. • Provide documentation (via recorded documents) showing an access easement is provided for the property to the north allowing for future connection to the existing parking lot. This documentation may show the easement either in the location of the existing driveway to the residence or through the proposed parking lot. If the easement is through the proposed parking lot, the site plan must be modified to show this. Landscaping and Screening — Chapter 18.745: Street Trees: Section 18.745.040.A.1. states that all development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.C.2. states that the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: • Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; • Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; • Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; The existing driveway is greater than 100 feet in length. The applicant's landscape plans dated 7-30-99 provides flowering pear trees planted 30 feet on center. According to the Western Garden Book, this type of tree would be considered a medium sized stature tree, therefore, this standard is met. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2. states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1. and 18.745.2.). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of- way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix; The subject property is zoned C-P adjacent to a residential use. Based on the buffer matrix, a 10-20 foot buffer is required between existing residential uses and parking lots with more than 50 parking spaces. The property to the north is a deep lot with the residence towards the western end of the lot. Because no additional residential uses will be constructed on the vacant portion of the lot, it is logical to require this buffer in the location of the residence only. The applicant's plans do not show a buffer will be provided adjacent to the existing residence, therefore, a condition is necessary. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed without additional Planning Division approval. Screening: Special Provisions Section 18.745.050.E.1.a. states that screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: • Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 7 OF 17 S D R 1999-000 23NA R 1999-00031 • Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; • Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and • The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that shows Blue Carpet Juniper, a lawn, and 2 London Plane trees will be installed along the frontage along SW Hall Boulevard. This shrub will provide a balance of vertical and low-lying shrubbery. The plan shows a tree will be installed every 7 spaces with the exception of the row of parking fronting along SW Hall Boulevard. An additional tree must be planted in this location. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.745, Buffering and Screening have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised landscape plan that shows a 10-20 foot buffer will be provided in accordance with landscaping and buffering standards of Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 adjacent to the existing residence on the property north of the subject site. If in the future, the residence is removed and the property developed with commercial uses, the parking spaces lost as a result of this condition may be replaced in the same location previously proposed, consistent with the dimensional revisions required by other conditions in this decision without additional Planning Division approval. • Submit a revised landscape plan that shows one (1) additional parking lot tree will be provided adjacent to the eastern row of parking spaces (adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard). Off-Street Parking and Loading Location: Section 18.765.030.B. states that off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building, however uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The proposed parking lot is accessory to the main parking lot associated with the Hall Corporate Center Office building. The main lot, with shared parking has the required number of parking spaces for the use. Because the existing parking is above the required amount, this criterion does not apply. Wheel stops: Section 18.765.040.J. states that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 8 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023N A R 1999-00031 The site plan submitted does not show wheel stops will be provided adjacent to the landscaping. The plan indicates that there will be a 3-foot overhang into the landscaping area. While this is permitted, the landscaping provided adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard is required to provide screening and, therefore, can not meet the low growing requirements for landscaping to be part of the overhang. In addition, the landscape plan shows plants that tend to grow higher than 4 inches (the height of required wheel stops). The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the 3-foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N.1. States that except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; The width of each parking space includes a stripe, which separates each space. Section 18.765.040.2. provides that aisles accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans show the spaces will be 9 feet by 18.6 feet. This dimension includes 3 feet of bumper overhand into the landscaping. As discussed above, the 3-foot bumper overhang, as shown, does not fully meet the standards. A condition has been imposed to modify the plan which will insure the space dimensions are met. The aisle widths are required to be 24 feet wide. Twenty-six (26) foot wide aisles are provided. Bicycle parking location and access: Section 18.765.050.A. states, with regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Section 18.765.050.B. states, with regard to covered parking spaces, when possible, bicycle-parking facilities should be provided under cover. Bike parking was addressed as part of the original SDR approval. Because no additional building space is proposed, this does not apply. Minimum and Maximum Off-street parking: Section 18.765.070.H. states that the minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements are contained in Table 18.765.2. Maximum parking for an office is 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The total square footage of the existing Hall Corporate Center is 32,735 square feet, therefore, the maximum parking spaces is 134. The applicant has a shared parking agreement with the property to the south (Swami Viswa Temple), however, there are only 74 parking spaces on the office site alone. Therefore, an additional 60 parking spaces could be provided before exceeding the maximum parking permitted for the existing office. Because the applicant is only proposing 51 this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the applicable standards of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading have not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, however, this standard will be met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 9 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 CONDITION:The plan must be revised to show wheel stops or low growing landscaping within the 3-foot bumper overhang along the perimeter of the parking lot. The parking spaces adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard must continue to have the required parking lot screening in addition to the 3-foot bumper overhang or wheel stops. This condition does not supercede other landscaping screening and buffering requirements discussed elsewhere in this decision. Tree Removal — Chapter 18.790: Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided an existing conditions plan that shows there are no trees on the site, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal do not apply. Visual Clearance Areas — Chapter 18.795: Section 18.795.030.B. states that a clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The plans do not show the vision clearance triangle. Staff scaled off the required dimensions and it appears that the vision clearance standards are met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been met. B. Specific SDR approval Criteria Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: Because the proposal does not involve a building, the proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment); 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi- family Use) 18.360.090.8 (Floodplain and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision or will be addressed further and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.12 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.13 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 10 OF 17 SDR 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and did not provide any objections or concerns with the plan as proposed. FINDING: Because the Police Department has reviewed the project and did not indicate the need for any additional conditions on proposed lighting or crime prevention measures, this standard has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Hall which is on a Tri-met bus route. Staff sent notice and request for comments to Tri-met. No comments, objections or concerns were received. FINDING: Because Tri-met did not indicate the need for additional transit facilities, this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a building for the purpose of wholesale sales (with associated office and storage) and 20% retail sales. The proposed use (parking lot expansion for existing office use) is permitted uses within the Professional Commercial (C-P) zoning district (18.520). Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed project. As can be seen from the table below, the proposal fully complies. STANDARD C-P ZONE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sf 21,507 sf Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 75 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. [1] N/A -Side facing street on corner&through lots [1] 0 ft. N/A -Side yard 0/20 ft. [2] N/A - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [2] N/A Maximum Height 45 ft. N/A Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 71% Maximum Landscape Requirement 15% 20% (after subtracting area of bumper overhang) [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.745 and 18.795 must be satisfied. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The table above shows that the proposal complies with the dimensional standards of the underlying zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 11 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 • C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the Tigard Development Code (TDC) standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and 12-foot travel lanes. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW adjacent to this site to provide a minimum of 45 feet. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide this dedication. The dedication should be processed through ODOT, using their forms. SW Hall Boulevard is currently improved to an interim width, with a pavement section of 25 feet from centerline to curb. There are no sidewalk improvements adjacent to this site. The applicant has indicated that they intend to construct a 6-foot sidewalk along the frontage of this site. They must also plant street trees along this frontage. In addition, there is an existing shared driveway located on the parcel immediately south of this site that serves the Kindercare, Swami Viswa Temple site and the current Hall Corporate Center. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study from Kittelson and Associates, dated September 13, 1999. Kittelson concluded that the addition of the parking spaces would have no adverse impact on the operations and safety of the existing driveway. The applicant's plan shows that they plan to widen the driveway to bring the width into closer compliance with TDC 18.705.030, which states a driveway serving more than 100 parking spaces should have a pavement width of 40 feet. The applicants' plan indicates that they plan to widen the entrance to provide a separate left turn lane. The overall paved width of the widened section would be 35 to 38 feet wide. The proposed length of left turn storage would be approximately 46 feet, as measured from the new ROW line. ODOT also submitted comments to the City concerning this application and they indicate two main concerns with the applicant's plan. The first concern is with the proposed left turn storage. ODOT recommends the applicant provide a minimum of 75 feet of storage, measured from the new ROW line. The second concern is with regard to the close proximity of the eastern access into the parking lot from the shared driveway. They are concerned that vehicles entering the parking lot from that entrance could back up into SW Hall Boulevard. ODOT and City staff met with the applicant on January 14, 2000, to discuss these issues. The applicant has now agreed to provide the 75-foot left turn storage length and will install signs at the eastern parking lot entrance to indicate "Do Not Enter", 'Exit Only". If the applicant will address these two issues, as they indicated in the meeting, both ODOT and City staff can recommend approval of the application. A condition of approval has been included with this recommendation to cover the two issues. The work in the ROW of SW Hall Boulevard must be covered in a permit issued by ODOT. This permit must be obtained by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A condition of approval has been included to require a new sidewalk along the frontage of this site. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 12 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. No further public sanitary sewer modifications are necessary to support this project. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). This site will discharge into an existing private storm drainage line that flows to the south of this site. That system was intended to accommodate this site and the vacant parcel directly north of this site. No further upstream provisions are needed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide an onsite storm water detention pipe that will meet the provisions of the USA design standards. The preliminary calculations indicate the 36-inch pipe should have enough capacity to provide adequate detention for this site. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 13 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 75 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $2,063. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS: Public Water System: No further public water system improvements are necessary to support this project. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 96-44) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant has proposed to provide a Storm-Filter structure from Stormwater Management, Inc. to treat the onsite runoff. The preliminary calculations indicate that a 3-foot by 10-foot vault with one filter cartridge will sufficiently treat the runoff from this site. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 14 OF 17 S D R 1999-000 23NA R 1999-00031 Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Street Utility and Improvement Standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with Conditions 6-13 specified at the front of this decision, the standards will be fully met. D. Impact Study: Section 18.390.040.B.2.e. states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. An impact study was provided for this development. As discussed previously under Street Utility and Improvement Standards, the applicant is proposing improvements that will mitigate any impacts created by the parking lot expansion including storm sewer, water quality, dedication along SW Hall Boulevard, and improvement to the driveway accessing the site. Because the applicant has shown that they will provide these needed improvements, staff can find that there will be no negative impacts to the public infrastructure as a result of this development. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division, Operations Utility Manager, Long Range Planning Division, Property Manager, and Crime Prevention Officer have reviewed the application and have indicated that they have no comments or objections to the proposal. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS The Unified Sewerage Agency has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offered comments which have been incorporated in to the body of this decision. ODOT has had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided the following comments: The proposed land use action is adjacent to Hal Blvd. According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999) Hall Blvd. is classified as a District Urban highway facility. We have an interest in ensuring that proposed land uses do not negatively impact the safe and efficient operation of this facility. We request that the following ODOT requirements be included as conditions of approval: 1 . The access to Hall Blvd. shall be widened to 36 feet to provide for one ingress lane and two egress lanes. The applicant shall obtain ODOT permits for all work in the State right-of-way. Contact Ed Miller, ODOT District 2A Permit Specialist, at 229-5002. All plans must be in metric. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 15 OF 17 SD R 1999-00023NAR1999-00031 2. If the property drains naturally to the State system, connection to the ODOT drainage system will be allowed. On-site detention and treatment of storm water may be required as a condition of the drainage permit. If detention is required, it must be designed to limit the peak runoff rate. The allowable peak runoff rate is based on the predevelopment runoff conditions. To evaluate a request for connection to the ODOT storm drainage system, a storm drainage study prepared by a registered engineer with a $500 review fee may be required. The site plan shows two proposed accesses on the existing driveway access to Hall Blvd. for the proposed parking lot expansion. We are concerned that traffic may back up onto the highway with the location of the proposed east access' close proximity to the existing highway access. There is the potential for inbound traffic using the east access to queue back into the highway and impact the safe operation of this facility. The traffic study estimated that under the projected build-out conditions, the queue of eastbound vehicles exiting the site would be 100 feet (assuming one egress lane on the driveway approach) during the p.m. peak hour, which would hinder traffic movements to and from the day care center as well as the site traffic exiting from the proposed east access. To ensure the long term safe traffic operations of the highway at the existing driveway and to alleviate the vehicle queuing eastbound on the driveway approach, we recommend the City to include the following conditions of approval: 1 . The applicant shall provide separate right and left turn egress lanes of a minimum 75 feet in length (i.e. 75 feet from the proposed east property line) on the driveway approach. 2. The proposed east access shall be located at least 75 feet from the new east property line. Simon Eng, DOT Transportation Analyst, reviewed the proposed site plan and traffic study for the proposed parking lot expansion. If you have any questions regarding the technical comments, Mr. Eng can be reached at 731-8223. US West, TCI Cable, PGE, Tri-met, NW Natural Gas, and GTE, have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 25, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 16 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NA R 1999-00031 • Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON FEBRUARY 8, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. January 24, 2000 PREPA BY: Glia Hajduk DATE Associate Planner ��+ January 24, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe'' •o DATE Planning Ma .ger is\curpin\Julia\sdr\Hall Corp cntr prkg lot.doc HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT PAGE 17 OF 17 S D R 1999-00023NAR 1999-00031 # II. • 6 ?>> H Z w 2 I- Ce a a w 0 0 Z (..L ,o. , a ECIf I no+r�ACTI R( O.MU else- Iii 005.4 smi n .9 . -- ---- a 1,13 S le I.. •.wo°. fv.W Oil'.. . ,�, • wr ro .. t1 I k1 Mr •r L'."o. A r-N.• ^ M LL.7. Pam.*1•ACW1 00 WW1 7..0 r ■ voMit... � ��i-5fT 1L'Q .....f 1 Q I-- I ' �...illi� -i::i �� ..t....a..ua......mou. ....1..HT,- 11.. - u) `y I spat OW,.- --1 LPL Sanwa,OOwf .CCLSS(3C!CM WAWA"i.X fD.►m OM O••••M•MI mot 11-09110 p I Q I , „'-r . i son.KM O CnitK I w-r ♦ -r j; a I- , uo.ICn•a1 /CCM 0•••S w r� I am.w+ °.w.°0•00.1 awarn.M y It V 1 i---•- / - x- EL MKT—, 310.21• • * 5 59-51 s: L «6ia, - - ---- - I I 1 I I ~ a SITE PLAN t HALL CORPORATE CTR. EXHIBIT MAP N SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 (map is not to scale) r I ----/w . -- ,_— CITY of TIGARD ,T GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM E ST 1SFRJCE ST VICINITY MAP - I L.a ilahLsi-- a ,.` SDRI999-00023 lli/_1� VAR 1 999-0003 - 4'1-k �n I'll! HALL,_. _ _- - — 0__. � CORPORATE ■�■ ■� ■■. CENTER 1111 M sus Ec N ��'��IPM PARKING LOT -III It SITE all� ���G ADDITION,. • < IIMM -1 —I= OM 11116.- limo. r 604. / LOMITA e r "111 • ickle, AIIII - 0..0* gor ii, 4 . s.,... N NO ire�' 0 200 400 600 Fad ■ , 1'-476 feet II 4L% 1- City of Tigard , Information on tills map is for general location only and , �. should be varinad wtih tine Da Hal Bwd Sarvlcea Divlabn. ' 1 lgar O Hal 2 3,� T(503) 39 9171_ �->._ htip'i w:.tlpard'ar.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 17, 1999;CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR • Marah Danielson "EXHIBIT B" ODOT, Region 1 SDR1999-00023/VAR1999-00031 123 NW Flanders HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING ADDITION Portland, OR 97209-4037 (Full Decision) Mike Nendelisky and Kris Landahl 8234 SW 252nd Gresham, OR 97080 Jim Waddle, Architect 1700 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 LN Propeties, LLC 11475 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Brazil P.O. Box 23064 Tigard, OR 97281-3064 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF 110ARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community STAT±, OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. 'Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist/for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) I NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: (Type,K■ d o!Nonce) (File No./Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Penod) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ® NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION FOR:. HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION SDR1999-000231VAR1999-00031 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director p Tigard Hearings Officer p Tigard Planning Commission p Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) p City of Tigard Planning Director p Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission p Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICELSl of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B",on January 25. 2000, and deposited in the United States Mail on January 25, 2000, postage prepaid. SSUAity (2 (Person that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /S day of )1/ c ti , 20_QQ. OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON SHERMAN S. CASPER „i;A# NOTARY PUBIJC-GREGON M]I Commission Expires: I?, Z0o3 COMMISSION ISM Y 13,2 MY COA+tMIS510!`!EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 -EX-144444A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00023 TI CITY OF TIGARD HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION Camrnuuity,oter opmeut ShapingA Better Co�nrnunity 120 DAYS = 4/13/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR1999-00023 Adjustment (VAR) VAR1999-00031 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested permission to construct an additional 51 parking spaces on a vacant lot adjacent to the Hall Corporate Center. The applicant has also requested an adjustment to the width of an access way when more than 100 parking spaces are provided since the existing driveway currently serves more than 100 spaces. APPLICANT: Mike Nendelisky and Kris Landahl OWNER: LN Properties, LLC 8234 SW 252' 11475 SW Hall Boulevard Gresham, OR 97080 Tigard, OR 97223 ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Ave., Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-P; Professional Commercial. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135DA, Tax Lot 01500. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV of the full decision. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25c) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 25, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON FEBRUARY 8, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. -=' EMl111111r mien m. 11111!1' 'iii _ __ c av�-• fA I I 40 SITE PLAN t HALL CORPORATE CTR. EXHIBIT MAP N SDR1999-00023NAR1999-00031 s�awrl L 4nvo ITED I I L�I Ill III I r VICINITY MAP l -�._.,___ mu•; ii N,�■ ■ i • ', ���111� � � �tNt1�111ot1 1 b ` - '-,�'-'rte'-� Mtn Olio �1a SDR1999-00023 ■ 4��iN■■ ■ ■■ mia im VAR1999-00031 ��— ■� .iuu i. g: E� ` ` ow CI�t �� EN HALL ■M .1m� ,) ,, I m� IME-a. CORPORATE ■a a'■llti !_ - �� m -1 CENTER I� N� r M-imE;1.� =NE PARKING LOT ■� mill, ,� 2 mil Ga mobr.�� ADDITION -:= -w:= SITE - -•ii.Ii In I: ,.,i FIE Tim= run. 1` ��ih. • ■m "r■� apG ,;.. m, �.' 1 NI m. . R / Lt „Air MI PS •t■ War 111.0 .1 ■=-. '0:* 1 Ts OGY■ EXHI . ITB • 1S135DA-00500 1S135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S135DA-01000 1- 35DA-0110s SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA F- • DONALD M PO BOX 82549 PO 'i 2 •97 PORTLAND,OR 97282 IGARD,OR 81 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD,OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1 S 135DA-01500 1St DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZIL . •• NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD PO B• 230■• TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97 '1 1S135DA-01700 1S135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD,OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1S135DA-01801 1S135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 1S135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DA-02802 1 -135DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE-%MAN •HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 11301 :•1 • H AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 23 1S135DA-02900 1S135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 35DA-0350$ 1. 135DA-03503 L N P•'•P IES LLC BRA- ••PR • •NANDA ASHRAMA 1148 : ••LL BLVD STE 100 11515 • • L BLVD ARD,OR • 223 =•RD,OR 97 1S135DD-00100 1S135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01400 1S135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01601 1 S 135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 KANEOHE,HI 96744 1S 135DD-02000 1 S 135DD-02001/' BROWN MILTON O BRO • O 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 S• •C •-• ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 135DD-02100 1 S 135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 15135DD-03603 1S135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03605 1S135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03607 1S135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B& FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135DD-03609 1S135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 • 1S135DD-03612 1S135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA • PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03614 1S135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03616 1S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1 S 135DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES,OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135DD-03703 1S136CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S136CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 ��yj� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CI YOFTIGARD Community Development - Shaping A Better Community SET A OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L.Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E1 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDRI999 00023/VAR1999 00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PKNG. LOT ADDITION AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) II City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . " / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (I ype ftina or Notice) FOR: E:" I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit": ',on the 21g day .1 Dece )ber,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 21x`day of December,1999, postag: prepaid. 41A /eiiel AO AIV*1.1./ , 1 •- .4 th.t t °repare. ?ice) -4 ' Subscribed and sworn/affirmed b‘fore me on the /() day of - " , %° OFFICIAL SEAL / ) -; DIANE M JELDERKS A i.:w NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' I t ' ' ' I I I I ' I ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 / My Commission Expiresr_/ 7 c2_3 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI .DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: t . THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ` CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment ShapingA OetterCommunity 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: December 21 , 1999 FILE NUMBERS: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00023 VARIANCE [VAR)1999-00031 FILE NAME: HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 4, 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner, in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address a relevant approval criteria with s zient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. , AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." riti 1 II I l I l I CITY of OARD �� ST VICINITY MAP 1166• .i11pI :I .. 1 111/Illllllli n r �� in �1� SDR1999-00023 -‘141.11-�„iI■■ ■■:i-/111_ VAR 1999-00031 IN NE, i _,` � C r ms n� ■ HALL ., me =MI II■�i■ CORPORATE ■il■■�II■ll■■■�� i� 96 Z CENTER !�■ �■ C■ =11b, � � PARKING LOT = SUBJEC . iii 1I,• �■ :'U ADDITION __ 7,SITE , • min _rIu_ 111.111h� E 111 : �;■�i- ■r' ■ ■.qui .. ■ �������� or '111111k j wi ■K■: : =,- 441 �,- -I • p∎► 4■ ,1 , .� 1� 'li,.,�• ■,' . . '}�. \ 0 200 400 800 feel ■■_, wit 191111 III 4- ,•�. City of Tigard ,,�_. ^,, M.n.1�.w�.rrrrrrrw...yw SDR-q EXHL B is 135DA-00500 is 135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S135DA-01000 1- 35DA-01105 SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA F• - DONALD M PO BOX 82549 PO ?is 2 •97 PORTLAND,OR 97282 IGARD,OR •• 81 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD,OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1S135DA-01500 1S? 5DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZIL . >' NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD PO B• 230: TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97 ?1 1 S 135DA-01700 1 S 135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD,OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1S135DA-01801 1S135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 15135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1S135DA-02802 1 -135DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE•%MAN "HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 11301 : " H AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 23 1S135DA-02900 1S135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 35DA-03501 1. 135DA-03503 L N P•'•P IES LLC BRA •PR •NANDA ASHRAMA • 1148 :11 ••LL BLVD STE 100 11515 • • L BLVD ARD,OR • 223 s•RD,OR 97 1 S 135DD-00100 1 S 135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01400 1 S 135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01601 1 S 135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 KANEOHE,HI 96744 1 S 135DD-02000 1 S 135DD-02001/' BROWN MILTON O BRO • •4I1,16N O 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 S• IC •.• ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 135DD-02100 1 S 135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S1 35DD-03603 15135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03607 1 S 135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 1S135DD-03612 1S135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03614 1S135D0-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03616 1S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1 S 135DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES,OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135DD-03703 1S136CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CC-00300 1 S 136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 136CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 • PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! \ 'L CITY of TIGARD i GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - _ Cl AREA NOTIFIED r-• co[ (500') <1 BROSSIA.PAUL FANO 1 .-_ __ Of sRAxAM,oO�ISAND may_ ,..•OBIE MEDIA CORP I 1 I NECKHAMIPAUL D AND NED(IRAN R VAGRANT,BREIIT BflOWM.MAR6ARETAMM I For: Mike Nedelisky Q FREEDYALBTEPN Na Re: 11475 SW Hal Blvd.• PFAFFLE (I S 135DA, Tax Lot 1500) N. — - — LRPROPEnnELUc RAOFORL6ARYT� BEDEW , I 401 SCHAEF PER.DONALD M JUNG,MARTIN MARIA ■ \ HERBERHOLL PAUL A AMA VIRNIL SEAM a AEBTINE—,---.__1 - MCGUIRE,ROBERT.11. `=1DpPB0UROW,DOMAIOEYAYAWIRYP N ,,i. J } BRANMAPREMAIUMDAASNAI�MA _ .__ - --- - cosHOw.EUUBEUl1 �- __.; ...___- - __� SUBJECT' - r- -- MURRAY,IIICHAR00 IRJUIL,CLARENCEIaMARVWEAN.\ NUM 11FTORD W OYNTII A --"" / SITE AMOAEWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED �i0u:4ux0a c ``�L.`��`�� RUNNEL " 1 M&TAMI JO BARE- �•� rs, NOCKETT,MART HA M BRAHMA PREYAMAYDAASN RAY .- AMIETOYPROPERTIF Ci —_ 2 I NER ERT.TOMMY HENRI NIMOER-CARE IEARMIMG MRS IMC FITZPATRICK,DAVID I <7T1" _ ROEMER,CAMUEIMJIA LT - �LRHOL:.AHTTEW B --- ,„ ONIRBERH01LANOREW1&RORf;1ICE . _ t '—MCIOUBNIIILTIMOTHY RAXC PANG,KEIKO TR CACH,6LRIILDCAN4JOAMI. MACKIMBOLFEBME a I .1 LOMITA - ! CHRSTIE,LACEYWIN • {{ ._ PARKER,IEAOYEWTRUSTEE �I '_J ,SOULANNAX BROWA.MILTONO )!TEELE,RABCY y, CABDPROPERTIEB r . r i I N L0 100 300 400 Fist W - �-p 4200.9 2614ut 4 ir f re -A 1611 a 411111■ City of Tigard e ICEO(maUOn on this map is for general location only and . should be venaed voth the Development Services Division. .. 13125 SW Hall Blvd r 4 Tigard,OR 97223 --a • (503)639-4171 hltp:laoww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct IS, 1999;CdmagicIMAGICO3.APR 1 S 135DA-00500 1 S 135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S135DA-01000 1- 35DA-0110• SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA F- - DONALD M PO BOX 82549 PO '. 2 -•7 PORTLAND,OR 97282 IGARD,OR 81 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD,OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1S135DA-01500 151- DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZIL . • NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD PO Bo 230: TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97 '1 15135DA-01700 15135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD,OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1S135DA-01801 1S135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 1S135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135DA-02802 1-135DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE-'MAN -HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 11308 : ' '' H AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 23 1S 135DA-02900 1 S 135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 35DA-03501 1 135DA-03503 L N PIP ' IES LLC BRA' 'PR •NANDA ASHRAMA 1148 :" ••LL BLVD STE 100 11515 • L BLVD •'ARD,OR • 223 :•RD,OR 97 - 1 S 135DD-00100 1 S 135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01400 1 S 135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01601 1 S 135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 KANEOHE,HI 96744 1 S 135DD-02000 1 S 135D0-020011 BROWN MILTON 0 BRO ILAIN O 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 S C ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKIE,OR 97222 1 S 135DD-02100 1 S 135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135DD-03603 1 S 135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135DD-03607 1S 135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 16135DD-03612 1S135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03614 1S135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03616 1S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135DD-03618 1S135DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES,OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135DD-03703 1S136CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND, OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S1 36CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 • Oct-15-99 05 : 16A P _01 Fax/MEMO From: Mike Nedelisky Show Timber Company 2325 Debok Rd West Linn, Or 97068 Ph: 503.658.2767 Fx: 503.658.5416 Date: Pages sent including fax cover sheet: 1 TO: IIT1 DAIS QAb OUrgerrt ❑ For Review ❑Please Coirmnnt D Please Reply 0 Please Recycle f Com, rrts: PAl VI PemE. ? oJic* AOMsL s o 144444 Re. : IAA, aAteotvAirt Arcomo.J IMU' tLQb 35DA ( 6 ( /51 r l Ar' Lof 41 t fktf, vel otavidet- hortAzdtripAi (h. ►ss o►tc. 74114:, s t APPLICANT MATERIALS Oct-08-99 02 : 18P WADDLE DESIGN 503 221 1709 P. 02 U U Z ■IA-ki414)e& Anti 44- SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW /?-°/- "/2- TYPE 11 APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 FAX (503) 684-7297 pENERA 1NFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 1.4+7 S W ( t.i., - ERATAFELLsualy Tax Map&Tax Lot 1n(s): ! 5135 D1 L( Coo Case No.(s): SiA - 000.23 Other Case No.($): L i 1S/999- 00031 Site Size:. 2! L- Racelpt No.: 9C1-3/9' 5 Application Accepted By: frJ fjl Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)•: V11Lkk JIl US ' ? ./Fik6(.Q I. Dale: / : Address: U 461 Phone: et-77:2,b S 'g�o city: ) I'� •I f' _ Zip: 3 Date Determined To Be Complete: Appricarte: Anita- Ain 2 LtS I1±) Comp Plan/Zone Designation; Address: 07<31-1 SE 2,C2,44 Phone: t2a$'276�7 city: L ,9,M Zip: 170 CIT Area: • When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession se,112&ge i:%eurpinynacterslsar..doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. - The owner(s)must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. BEQQISFQSUBBt7T� ELEMENTS ;Application Elements Submitted: PRgpOSAL SUMMARY •placation Form The owners of record of the subject request Site p Owner's SignaturelWritten Authorization Development Review approval to allow be Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ppto (please be specific): FA/Sit e/Plot Pfan j ,i L A I ( ar copies based on ore-app crack usi) Ct1iV i �t, _ "Site/Plot Plan(reduced tit'/3"x 1 V) ErAppticant's Statement (of copies based on pre-app check Gel) Construction Cost Estimate QKUSA Sewer Use information Card stn'ovtedfoompleted at apple-awn sufx*wr. ) typed 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped 6 Ltaaal Size Envelo es ❑ Filing Fee (unae.sloo.000) S "300.00 (s,oo.000-5ood.eee) S 1.600.00 is i Mduon a over) 51.780.00 c.se tsicoolL 1 - - • Oct-11-99 05:05A P . 02 Oct-OH-99 02: 113P WAOOLE OE57CN 503 721 1709 P-O3 ..... r..v., cuu.ti • List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE,SENSITIVE LANDS,OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be consider as part of thus Application: q r/q2(� -f� c 6-...55-S (n/I'c� .. -----• — -- mom.. �..,�.,.,.,. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you win need to submit ALL of the arntlaKOMIthinatfiLEIZMaill as described on the front of Ode application in die"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Deluged Submitted Requirement Inforrnatfon sheets can be obtained.upon request for sit types of Land Use'1ppl*cabons-} THE APPLICANTS)SHNAL.L.CERTIFY THAT; • li, .• I• l .. 1:. . . 1 , '... . �.. V. ',• 1 1..a ,1.-� H , I.•• • n r••i . ,. me.iYtY73e1 • If the application is granted,the applkanl will exercise the fights granted in acuxdarr_e with the tams and subject to aN the conditions and limitations of the approval. • P11 of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachment,and exhibits transmitted herewtttl,are ; and the applicants so acknowledge that any perrriN issued,base on This applioation, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false- • The ppplloant has read the entire contents of are application, including the policies and criteria. and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES oil=owner of the subject property. ATED This day of O C - • 19 Jgi4 - Owner's Sig — Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 _ • l VIII' CITY OF TIGARD Community Devefopment ShapingA Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 4/13/2000 FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00023 VARIANCE (VAR] 1999-00031 FILE TITLE: NALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT ADDITION APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky & Kris Landahl ARCHITECT: Jim Waddle 8234 SE 252nd WaddleDesign/Planning/ Gresham, OR 97080 Architecture 1700 SW Fourth Avenue, Ste. 105 Portland, OR 97201 PHONE/FAX: (503) 658-2767 (503) 221-2003 OWNERS: LN Properties LLC 11475 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: Site Development Review approval to construct 54 additional parking spaces for the Hall Corporate Center. LOCATION: 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, 1S135DA, Tax Lot 1500. ZONE: C-P; The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, REVIEW 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, and 18.810. CRITERIA: CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: December 21, 1999 DUE: January 4, 2000 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: lanuary20,2000 (Tentative) ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 Cl PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP El NARRATIVE © TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARCHITECTUAL PLAN © SITE PLAN El LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TECH REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407 SDR 1999-00023NAR1999-00031 HALL CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: -L Cn. GC(2- . PAIyG41-1(A \-11. FOR Date: I c ZE3( LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS St 1a`t`l-coat ❑ COMPLETE [.(INCOMPLETE GRADING a Existing and proposed contours shown? [E - Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes [�No a Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES a Right-of-way clearly shown? � '/ [ , Centerline of street clearly shown? L�' Name of street(s) shown? E Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets `--I Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? ^ ,^ Traffic study required/submitted? OPP' Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? a Check widths proposed on public streets ❑NApr Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines? ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES • Existing/proposed lines? Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES • Existing/proposed lines? �04 Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? Ak-s= ' �PR£�-+k� t: a ter quality facility shown on plan? does area provided match calculations for size requirement? [I)\ ` tubs to adjacent properties required? [r Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? \eng\bnanr\masters\public facility plan checklist.doc 0 • 4 November 3, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Mike Nedelisky 8234 SW 252nd Gresham, OR 97080 Dear Mr. Nedelisky: The City has received your application for Site Development Review (SDR1999-00023) to add 54 parking spaces to the Hall Corporate Center. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Submit preliminary sizing calculations for water quality and for water detention. 2. Submit a Variance application and pay the Variance fee (20% of fee equals $109). You will also need to submit documentation in support of the Variance application. Alternatively, you may revise your plans to accommodate a 50- foot access width with 40 feet of pavement. Once the additional information is submitted, staff will deem the application complete and schedule the review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 639-4171, extension 407. Sincerely, ulia Powell Hajdu Associate Planner is\curpin\julia\sdr\hall corp center acc.doc c: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 SDR1999-00023 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 CITY OF TIGARD December 16, 1999 OREGON Mike Nedelisky 8234 SW 252nd Gresham, OR 97080 RE: SDR1999-00023/VAR1999-00031 — HALL CORPORATE CENTER Dear Mr. Nedelisky: The City has received the additional information indicated in our November 3, 1999 incompleteness letter. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete and has been scheduled for review. Staff has set a tentative decision date of January 20, 2000. Please be aware that this date is a target date only and that the actual date the decision is rendered may be before or after this date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 639-4171 , extension 407. Sincerely, ,,,-41/1/714k Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpin\julia\sdr\hall corp center acc2.doc c: Jim Waddle 1700 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 105 Portland, OR 97201 SDR1999-00023 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • . Waddle' DESIGN / PLANNING / ARCHITECTURE 1927 NW Kearney Street Portland, Oregon 97209 RECEIVED PLANNING NOV 2 2 1999 November 19, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Ms. Julia Hajduk,Associate Planner City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon, 97223 RE: SDR 1999-00023 Dear Julia: Thank you for inviting us to participate in the discussion of the access easement and the City's dimensional requirements. We understood from that meeting that the City will consider approval of modified dimensions which if approved,will apply to current and future projects located on properties served by this access. Specific Dimension Changes Requested: 1. Easement width: Reduce requirement from fifty feet to forty feet. 2. Pavement width curb to curb at Hall blvd.: Reduce requirement from forty feet to thirty six feet to accommodate the potential need for three 12 foot lanes. 3. Length of access width at forty(thirty six) feet to accommodate the potential need for three 12 foot lanes: 70 feet with a taper length of 70 feet back to a 24 foot curb to curb width. 4. . Pavement width curb to curb interior from taper and three lane area at Hall Blvd. to be 24 feet,as no turning movements would require three lane widths. We believe that these suggestions are reasonable and prudent for this access easement as supported by the traffic study submitted to you with the SDR documents. We would appreciate your opinion and concurrence on this subject. We are delaying application for a variance pending your input. Thanks for your consideration! Sincerely, 4 � e Jame H.Waddle,Architect \cc: 4 is Londahl,Mike Nedelisky 1a .r. waS•r+A io; ! as4odovJ lt+awawd'Nlw S. aa5adoitd I � 1 II I I O I I � � I � 1 -mss 1 z I , 1 t4 aw3nY d +9 N11 1X7 �" i�Z I • 1. 1Nawas+v.a �Jlt aasodoz. ,Pl- I • Waddle DESIGN / PLANNING / ARCHITECTURE 1927 NW Kearney Street Portland, Oregon 97209 December 8, 1999 Ms.Julia Hajduk,Associate Planner City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon, 97223 RE: SDR 1999-00023 Dear Julia: We ask that this request for an Access Variance be considered as part of the subject application. Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require more than 100 parking spaces provide two driveways with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. We request a variance to one of the two driveways that are required by this standard,and further request a variance for the dimensional requirements specified by ordinance for a single access proposed for a parking area of more than 100 spaces. We further request that if these variances are approved, that the approvals be applicable to all future developments served by the easement. Specific Dimension Changes Requested: 1. Easement width: Reduce requirement from fifty feet to forty feet. 2. Pavement width curb to curb at Hall blvd.: Reduce requirement from forty feet to thirty six feet to accommodate the potential need for three 12 foot lanes. 3. Length of access width at thirty six feet to accommodate the potential need for three 12 foot lanes: 70 feet with a taper length of 70 feet back to a 24 foot curb to curb width. 4. . Pavement width curb to curb interior from taper and three lane area at Hall Blvd. to be 24 feet,as no turning movements would require three lane widths. These dimensions provide a significantly greater accommodation to future traffic than that projected by the traffic study that was commissioned to study this problem and submitted with the subject application. We request that this document be read carefully to recognize and understand its significance in revealing that the perceived or assumed traffic"problem" at the interface of the easement to Hall Blvd. does not now exist and is unlikely to ever exist in the future. The zoning code requirement of a 50 foot wide easement and 40 feet of paving width for the entire access distance of over 400 feet is inappropriate to the maximum build-out potential of the properties involved, and may exceed even the City's own standards for dedicated neighborhood streets which serve much larger and more densely developed properties. • r If this requirement is enforced,it will create a significant financial burden on the property owners who have already invested in curb,sidewalk,parking and paving based on previous requirements and approvals. The extent of existing parking and infrastructure that could be required to be demolished and rebuilt would not just be a financial burden,but would unnecessarily waste bare land resources to the extent that a future project's economic viability could be placed in jeopardy. Section 18.108.150 allows the Director to approve, or approve with conditions,a request for an access variance based on the following criteria: It is not possible to share access; this request for an access variance is for the purpose of providing a shared access among existing and future parking lots which have more parking spaces than would normally be permitted. There are no other alternative access points on the street in question or from another street; The site takes access from SW Hall Boulevard which is designated as an Arterial Street within the City's Comprehensive Plan. Because of the developed nature of adjoining properties,alternative points of access are not possible. The access separation requirements cannot be met; The proposed Variance does not involve separation requirements as the variance requests relief from developing a second driveway to serve more than 100 parking spaces. The request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access; Based on the developed nature of properties adjoining SW Lomita Avenue,a variance from developing a second point of access is the least variance that is possible to address this requirement. The approved access or access approved with conditions will result in a safe access; Access to this site has been studied by a qualified traffic engineer,and additional safety provisions provided that go beyond the traffic engineer's observed and projected requirements and recommendations. The proposed variance is intended to put the access configuration issue to rest once and for all,to be applicable to the current proposed and any future proposed development of properties served by this access easement. The visual clearance requirements of Section 18.102 will be met. No site improvements are proposed within the Clear Vision Area. There will be no impact to the line-of-site condition at the existing driveway intersection on to SW Hall Boulevard. For this reason, this criteria is not applicable. Please give the comments offered above your full and careful consideration in determining your decision on this critical request. Sincerely, P11 ►� em Jams . Wad.le,Architect cc: Kris Londahl,Mike Nedelisky t . { • 0 SDE qq-0.73 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAT TO: City of Tigard Date Received ATTN: RECEIVED DEPT: 14-h vi i n OCT 0 81999 ` casually OBtatemiENT From: '. _ .�.�,,,. Contact Name. Name:Project 4W' t L.L./ i Phone: Fax: Comments I i • LN Properties 9801 SE Westview Court Portland, OR 97266 8 October 1999 Re: Site Development Review Dear Interested Party: I, Mike Nedelisky of LN Properties, am the owner of property located at 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon, map and tax lot 1 S 135DA-01500. I am considering proposing constructing a parking lot at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Monday, October 25th, 1999 Hall Corporate Center 11481 SE Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 7:00 p.m. Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-658-2767 if you have any questions. Mike Nedelisky LN Properties • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, 'f- I hi` NI 1-7r.iusl<-`4 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed C ;(4-91Ru.a R P 4;46, tom-r affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 11 y 1 C SW t-Ikt,t a VD• 1 b ,o 972,2.3 , and did on the gill day of o ern ge,2 19 'l`1 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a v lkt1.1)M-f.-17. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at Y14-S 1-,0 1-44A1.A- 6LL)D . 711,7A/2-0 . Mti 7 Z 2,3 (state locati• you posted notice on property)0 'is, Signature "the pr -nce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the x day of Cc-k..- , 19cn =4g,t AL SEAL BLAKE / _LIC-OREGON C�-/►�-Y NO 309408 NOTARY PUBLI OF OREGON ES FEB 9. 7M12 My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: IFFIL rOK7 t. CFATG- - I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: p-Rti t A((, (4 f 1 Name of Applicant/Owner: KA t k SAA'.At.`1 ,, ,1 I Address or General Location of Subject Property: I IA 7S IAA) 1� k.VLt D 1-1(01A-11-0- oQ 01 Z23 LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I 1 3 Jc-b A- 0i COO h:Vog inlpattylmasters1attpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I Mike Nedelisky , being duly sworn, depose and say that on b(Xol5 -4 i . , 19 ', I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 11475 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at t,k1 t. 9'o S lA c 11 ' % �.cGS, t,tr•, .lz& GI-7o(cig , with postage prepaid thereon. r r II ignature n the esence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 6 day of 0 cA - , 19_2. OFFICIAL SEAL CINDY BLAKE 0- ‘- lf\' `@''/y NOTARY PU9LIC AREGON fQoJ(p `"'� COMM18810N N0.308408 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEB 9.2002 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: ■U Lbkfot.)-A t TL'k i TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: FAA Etnl(( I.ot I Name of Applicant/Owner: No(g. N 60a,t 4a I Address or General Location of Subject Property: I i ci 7 C hw 4AtL )LJb 11GM-f) .Ail L I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 1 Si 2S DA ` 01 cz h:Uog in 1pattylmasterslaffmail.mst LI I Y OF I IiAKU COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAM (CIT) SUBCOMMITTEES WEST CIT EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL'_;CIT >l Ed & Fran Egan Naomi Gallucci Sally Christensen Debra Seeman 14635 SW Bull Mountain Road 11285 SW 78th Avenue 15685 SW 76th Avenue 13372 SW Clearview Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Earl & Marilyn Elias Sue Rorman Mary Ann Melvin Mary Skelton 13540 SW Village Glenn Drive 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 10395 SW Bonanza Way 10355 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Minor Stephen Bicker 14210 SW Windsong Court 14235 SW 97th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Paul E. Owen Mark Bogert 10335 SW Highland Drive 14445 SW 1009h Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Beverly Froude Twyla Brady 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Smelter Debra Muir 14900 SW 103rd Avenue 15065 SW 79`h Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Joan Best Sue Siebold 10705 SW Murdock Ln, #F2 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kathy Palmer Tim Esav c/o John Tigard House PO Box 230695 14260 SW High Tor Dr. Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 • •PLEASE NOTE: In addition to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all names on this list. • 1,curpinlmastersVevlsed\citnotic.mst Revised 4/12/99 NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAIM IJ \ CI Y of IGA- i GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM a NOTIFICATION Illi°D CO AREA MAP ,, CO • 1$13571000700 = ' (S O o 1$13 010,500 -? l J 1 131350/101000 1 I _^35DD0200 38ce00e00 ,57350002001 151 011100 °000280 \\ / Q 1$,350201500 —_ ,_ pFAFFLE 13u5Daplpo ! For: Kerry teinmetz 131150301800 tS1350301900 iS1a503Di0 p1$135D008B18 1513503016Q1 151350801000 � ry Fidelity National Title Co. ,,,,,,not a1313511003618 U1363300400 11a6C000300 Re: I S 1 3501, 01500 I- _ 11213501101706 \ 15175 01200 • 5000364 1121350303503 _ _ 131350003601 �� 111750007811 1 1313511101600 S U B J E C T \, 1313300015 �` I1S130CC00W1 1a135D003615 \\ SITE 1 7lsofiolefil 1$735000111$1 1$us.— (47 3HIBrr —11217sODOb60jw �� 7 15120D601300 FROFEWIES ID i . 500030131 1517 5 03 0 18 01 il �� �- •1b5000afi01a 1131350001601 I ---.- - 1$ll5DD02017� I(— j\ J 1$1150003807 / 1013500038 1121150007000 11$135000180 15175000360 I I I___----J 111250003824 _ �. ' �-- 1350/300166'LO M I TA 131350003300 18175000201 C )51asD0p140o 1$1330002001 - 151350001300 1$113 0 0 9 2 10 0 r ' F� r- • N ',.__—/ '" ...00 0 �00 200 300 400 Fest L11 � 1".261 fist Q i <a1.h i�l�, . ro, City of Tigard iii 41fak 41 CO Information vn oe this map is ev general location S only Di and it #S■ should be verified with the Development Services Division. ill" - 13125,SW O Hall 97223 • Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 htfpYMw.v.ci.tpard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 1,1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 1S135DD-03612 1 S 135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03614 1 S 135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03616 1 S 135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135D D-03618 1 S 135DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES, OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1 S 135D D-03703 151 36CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND, OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CC-00300 1 S 136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1S136CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD, OR 97223 • 1 S135DA-03500 1 S135DA-03503 L -ROPE; S LLC BRA ' APR •NANDA ASHRAMA 1148 ;4 HALL BLVD STE 100 11515 '.••ALL BLVD - ARD,0- '7223 TI 'D,OR • • 3 1S135DD-00100 1S135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01400 1S135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135DD-01601 1S135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 KANEOHE,HI 96744 1S135DD-02000 1 135DD-02001 BROWN MILTON O BRO'.• MI aN O 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 ' ••-OCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 • WAUKIE,0"7222 1S135DD-02100 1S135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE, OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S135DD-03603 1S135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03605 1S135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03607 1S135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03609 1 S 135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 1S135DA-00500 1S135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1 S 135DA-01000 1 35DA-01100 SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA FE• :•NALD M PO BOX 82549 PO :• ,•7 PORTLAND,OR 97282 T ARD,OR • 181 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD, OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1 S 135DA-01500 5DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZI •' NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD P0131 •-4 TIGARD, OR 97223 -ARD,OR 9 :1 1S135DA-01700 1S135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD,OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1 S 135DA-01801 1 S 135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 1S135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135DA-02802 35DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE :1 AN "HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 11300 '1ITH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 T.4. ,RD,OR 9 ' 3 1S135DA-02900 1S135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 OCT-11-99 10:45 FROM-FIDELITY i,,.i SERVICE + T-428 P 01/04 F-649 Compliments of: lit Greg Smalley customer Service/lnformation Services October 11,1999 8:19 AK f'rrpared Especrally far a Mike Nedetisky Show Timber Company Fidelity Natkm& � , . , . %''.:i: j` . .1 Y , : , • ,• , h , . ._ __ . . ..__. , . A..; .rillij Company of Oregon "The Closing Company" Sri' 401 SW Fourth Avenue , Portland , OR 9720 4 Ph: 503 227.5478 Fax: 503.274.5,472 csrequeyt�tifnto.com http://www.fntO.GO1 ,OCT,11-'i9 10:45 FROM-FIDELITY CIJST SERVICE + T-428 P.02/04 F-649 ,' illti `f Fidelity National Title Company , . fin .. The Closing Company Prepared For. Prepared By GREG SMALLEY Information Services Department 401 SW Fourth Avenue - Ponlawd, Oregon 97204 Phone (503)227-LIST(5478) Fax. (503)274-5472 E-mail. csrequestQfmo corn OWNERSHI?INFORMATION Owner .Lu Properties Llc Ref Parcel Number . 1S135DA(1150u C'uOwner 7-01S R-OIW S• 35 (2'251 Sae.Adders:, • 11475 SW Hall Blvd Tigard 97223 Parcel Number :R0275142 Mail Address . 11475 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Map Number Telephone Owner- Tenant. County • Washington(OR) SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION -_,...,'' T9-amferred ' 04/24/1999 Loan Amount • Document Y . 50279 Lender Sale Price .$190,000 Loan Type • Deed Type Warranty Interest Rate . Owned • 100 Vesting Type .Corporauon PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page dk Grid • f,55 F3 Mkt Land • $74,490 Census . Tract 309 00 Brock. 1 Mkt Structure . Subdivision/Plat •Metzger Acres Other . Neighborhood Cd :LPJHY Mb Total . $74,490 Land Use .2002 Vacant,Cammercial %Improved . Legal . METZGER ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 23, 96-99 Taxes .$947.59 . ACRES.50 Exempt Amount Exempt Type Cla..cs Code . R1 Levy Code 02381 Millage Rate . 15.2174 M5011ssd Value : $62,270 -- .6 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms • Lot Acres - 50 Year Built . 1938 Bathrooms • LotSc1Ft •21,7x0 EffYrarlslt . Neat Method lism Fin Sql Fluor Cover . Pout . Bsm Unfin agFF . Fnzrndallun . Appliances . Bsm Low WI . Roof Shape . Dishwasher sher Bldg&Ft Roof Mail . Hood Fan 1st FirSe,F: InterrorMat • Deck - Upper Fir SgFt . Paving Matl Garage Type - Porch agFt Cons:Type Garage SF . .4mc SclFt Est Finish Deck SgFr • �-.... This tape information has been furnishes,without charge,in conformance wan the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon insurance Commissioner The Insurance Division cautions mtam eaianes that this service is designed to benefit the utnmete insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted Said services may be discontinue° No liability is assumed for any errors in this report OCT-11-99 10 46 FROM-FIDELITY CuST SERVICE + T-428 P 03/04 F-649 .J 1 + i•_S +MSsev T3TAT QFOREOON ,:i CaWaty at w �4lon es I I,JURY , � +• , a!bwsr mint i n ;y;` county Cunt io thel �,a '1�Qi Ally.;ttcordlr reRtrp to; I ' �'q I%. . w t 6W Kilt iiii ` .:i;' f. ,,: tqo i ^dnaux et aid �,u• i`„. .� bo1k PX UntA a eAaogv fa rag sisal all Sax igatuma . 0141 to teat to the following Wall; - pear 994b0279 Reotr 99063b Ysd,00 i1Sar..$W nail RoWavat QI�Y; 2304 Malt I.4 W 1 Eacsoo Na w NQ. Tl4 b II STATUTORY WARRANTY�p III chore F ,Grantor,convoys and warrants to IPl Pr011V, L1L,Grantee, the following described teal property free of liens anus aawtntbrances,oxccpt us apcoif3cally Kt forth herein. FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART THEREOF This prope y is free of liens and enWmbraucaa,EXCEPT: Easoa;aura,Covenants,Coudislocu and gastric:tona of:r.cord,If any. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW u&3 OP 'TEb PROPERTY DAD IN THIS BEFORE R E SIGN IN VIOLATION 4 TS IjrINSNSTRUMENT,'�PER5t7N ACQUTAINO POE TITLE TTE g pp.Op 3 Olt ACCFUT3N Ti)Q TEE � "r' 9ILOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING s ON WSUITS AGAINST FARMING DEPARTMENT R FOREST PRACTICES AS OWNED IN ORS 30.950. The trno canaidaran{on far this apuVOYaace 13 S .o4,"Paid W an ac.arauoQator pnrangua go an l&C O31 cxctlauito'rngoe ca re4.iai d•raphoora d 01 fo.00) Dated 10116. / day of tit�` *f- NasueCOUNTY Tsn Tar P. { i net grip NM .•... • Regan STATE OF ORP.0914 Thie inatlpmwtt Was aolawed before we on 1bss'1^eN'of Y s irl MA AR Notary Htgbtia for Oregon u •yaw' R 1.F 0. d PgLx36 �YY NOmetgOe rtC•aS p `...� caerw K eta '3&2 My caarudeulon agapltea uY CoM+wB`�DANES OCT-11-99 10:46 FROM-FIDELITY CUST SERVICE + ?-428 P 04/04 F-349 ■ me, Order No 972184 •• nvISED EXhuBIT'A" The North 75 teat of Lot WA,dlocstO.METZt3BR ACit TRACTS,In the City of Tigard,County of washingtor and Mete of Drag . TOOETH R WITH Mt austnent Cesaribed as follows: A porael of land tooted!n ma Northeast one-goner of ttw 9ouuwaat on .quarter of 9eadan 38,Towrnhhfp South, In ry of wa.fnpton and State cf Q os said Meridian. fa lossic C,onlrtltmoing at I found 2 tnpit Iron pipe at tna Southend Doman of the David C.Graham DanatIon Land Claim No.52.NO pot silo ding the initial point of GRAHAM ACREB;thence trading the Wog any of the Thomas GUS Donation Land Cairn No.Ed,Sotpn 01.48'47'West 1118.78 feet to point on the South lino of Lot 28 METZ1318 ACf;E TRACTS;thane tracing Said EitrAtt Tine,Feat 292.60 feat ttoa Nf 1/2 heme Iron pips AG fat,more or lase,Wait Otte contorting of B.W.i his Boulevard(Co my Road thence d No.94 North a Nonn a Mamma of 42.93 feet to the true point of twgInran distance of 32.97 fort;thence Wet 12940 Mar,deaOice UO 33.77 feel;thence North eu't1'11"Eaat. 12.141 felt to the true poke Q of thia • .ti • 4(-,li d„,fr- frt,- 61/%4ii--- 64- - ,ate tv sr /7/y am Jo . t z. zs � K f35'" z /aY L "XL /,� I .14j Z 7s, X I2ez5z) r / 7 4 5,12:=0 #74 - X Z Le 0 V eft s-6 475- U� t off/' • S �Z� � RECEIVED PLANNING tcC 41 1999 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OFTIGAR© . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • Date Received TO: City Of Tigard ATTN: I A.dk m ! ( ( , DEPT: pc,/{446xx, . \ / From: Name: Project Name: { Phone. . . . + r x • Fax: Comments transmittalform _ J Applicant's Statement Hall Corporate Center, Parking Lot Addition Summary of Proposal Applicant proposes to alleviate the existing parking shortage by developing an additional surface parking lot of 51 spaces on recently purchased land nearby the original development. Narrative Proposed development complies with all dimensional criteria sited in the pre-ap notes. All spaces comply with section 18.765.030 with no spaces further than 300 feet from the Hall Corporate Center site. Access to this new parking lot is provided by two access points from the existing access easement. The continuing viability of the existing single access easement has been evaluated by a traffic engineer,whose findings and report are included with this submittal. Clear vision area, landscape and buffering criteria have been met. No additional signs are provided. Sensitive lands, steep slopes, and water resources criteria do not apply. There are no existing trees on the site. Impact Study The impact of the proposed additional parking on the transportation system was evaluated by a professional traffic engineer,whose findings and report are included with this submittal. Water, sewer and parks systems are not affected by the proposed development. Storm water treatment and affect on the existing storm water system has been evaluated, and was found to be within the criteria dictated by the previous downstream analysis. Noise impact is no greater than the existing approved uses. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! CITYo I A' . GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ----' igiq I _ f AREA NOTIFIED W e7 r� 00 (S00') BROSSIA.PAUL FANO 1 GRAHAM.DONG AND "" -- HIE MEDIA CORP I RECKHAM,PAUI 0 ADO 111111i1 • W MCTAGGART•BRENT BAOWN.MIIRGARET0.NN For: Mike Nedelisky FREEDMAN. 1 Re: 11475 SW Hall Blvd. a PFAFFLE LMPROPERI1ES.lLC (I S 135DA, Tax Lot 1500) _: BRADFORD.GARY TR NEOELISKY,MICHAEL I SCHAEFFER.00NALOM AIMS.MARTIN MARIA HERBERHOL2,PAUL A a ANNA I VILMIG.SEAN a JUSTIN0 ._ -- _ MCGUIRE,ROBERT I a ~' LOUFROUROw,DONALD IVA a MARY P 11 A wi 11111M11g11$MIyM - COSHOW.ELITABEERI RRAr.RICHA 0 - - - !RAM CUIEMCE E a MART JEAN SUBJECT IBM.CLUTCH W SMITH!'A ���tt SITE ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LORI • BOOM,L I N D A ` •i +a, \ RUCHES.JEFFREY M a TAMI JO B RE `'��.�r1� '\ BRAHMA PREMANANOAASHRAM II CKM MARTHA M � APPLETON PRO MR 5C ',. - RT,TOMMY MARY KINDER-CARE LEARNING 05105151 FIT7PATRICK,DAM/ I _ _. HOLMES.SAMUEIM/JANETM ---j MERBFRHOQ.ANORIW I O1ERIFRHOII,ANOREWIaRORENCE- 11 MCLO UGNUR.TIMOTI}RANI PANG.SEIKO TR CACH.CERALO C AM0J0AAI MACKIMMON,RRN E a —.- I WANG.MRS-JUI KAI LO M I T,[�` _ PARKER.JEROME W TRUSTEE CHRISTIE.LACEYTRUST SATLER.ANNA 0 BROWS MILTON O . �i, STEED,NAN CY TRUSTEE I TIGARD PROPERTIES INC�;" t* • N 0 100 200 300 400 Feet W �� a Ty seT R»1 Q i < �A Ati‘ i& ,, GO City of Tigard 1 Information on this map is for general location only and it , OS't should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd �' • . Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http:/hvww.ci tigard.or.us Community Development Plot d ate:Oct 15, 1999;CdmagicgMAGIC03.APR 1S135DA-00500 1S135DA-00700 GRAHAM DON G AND BROSSIA PAUL F AND 11260 SW HALL BLVD 300 4TH ST TIGARD, OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S135DA-01000 1- 35DA-0110. SCHAEFFER DONALD M SCHA F- ' DONALD M PO BOX 82549 PO =: 2 -97 PORTLAND,OR 97282 IGARD,OR 81 1S135DA-01200 1S135DA-01300 SCHAEFFER DONALD M HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PO BOX 23697 12215 SW 33RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S135DA-01400 1S135DA-01401 BRAHMA PREMANANDA ASHRAM KINDER-CARE LEARNING CNTRS INC 11515 SW HALL BLVD 1777 NE LOOP 410#1250 TIGARD,OR 97223 SAN ANTONIO,TX 78217 1 S 135DA-01500 1S1- DA-01600 LN PROPERTIES LLC BRAZIL . NCE E&MARY JEAN 11475 SW HALL BLVD PO B• 230: TIGARD,OR 97223 ARD,OR 97 '1 1S135DA-01700 1S135DA-01800 BRAZIL CLARENCE E&MARY JEAN NEDELISKY MICHAEL J PO BOX 23064 25 82ND DR TIGARD, OR 97281 GLADSTONE,OR 97027 1 S 135DA-01801 1 S 135DA-01900 L N PROPERTIES LLC BROWN MARGARET ANN 11481 SW HALL BLVD STE 100 19065 SW JOHNSON AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97006 1S135DA-02000 1S135DA-02801 OBIE MEDIA CORP MCTAGGART BRENT 4211 W 11TH PO BOX 231207 EUGENE,OR 97402 TIGARD,OR 97281 1 S 135DA-02802 1 135DA-02803 FREEDMAN STEPHEN H& FRE'!MAN 'HEN H& 11300 SW 90TH AVE 1130e : " H AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 9 23 1S135DA-02900 1S135DA-03000 JUNG MARTIN MARIA VIRNIG SEAN&JUSTINE 11400 SW 90TH 11405 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 35DA-03501 1 135DA-03503 L N P •P IES LLC BRA- •PR •NANDA ASHRAMA 11481 :n ••LL BLVD STE 100 11515 • L BLVD ARD,OR • 223 T = "D,OR 97 1S135DD-00100 1S135DD-01300 CHRISTIE LACEY TRUSTEE STEELE NANCY TRUSTEE 22020 SW AEBISHER RD 11660 SW HALL BLVD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-01400 1S135DD-01600 SAYLER ANNA R CACH GERALD C AND JOAN L PO BOX 23757 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD, OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-01601 1 S 135DD-01800 HOLMES SAMUEL M/JANET M PANG KEIKO TR 12215 SW 33RD AVE 46-442 HOLOLIO ST PORTLAND, OR 97219 KANEOHE, HI 96744 1 S 135DD-02000 1 S 135DD-02001 BROWN MILTON 0 BRO ILT6N 0 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 S C ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 M11 AUKIE,OR 97222 1S1 35DD-02100 1 S 135DD-03300 TIGARD PROPERTIES INC PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 5320 SW MACADAM AVE MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S135DD-03603 1 S135DD-03604 COSHOW ELIZABETH I BERGER CLIFFORD W&CYNTHIA A 11425 SW LOMITA AVE 11455 SW LOMITA AVENUE TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03605 1 S 135DD-03606 HUGHES JEFFREY M&TAMI JO BARE APPLETON PROPERTIES INC 11485 SW LOMITA AVE 7100 SW HAMPTON STE 103 TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135DD-03607 1 S 135DD-03608 FITZPATRICK DAVID G&BETTY L HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B&FLORENCE 7615 SW CHESTNUT STREET 9620 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135DD-03609 1S135DD-03611 MACKINNON FERN E& MCLOUGHLIN TIMOTHY R AND 11625 SW LOMITA 5400 SW 198TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ALOHA,OR 97007 1S135DD-03612 1S135DD-03613 HERBERHOLZ ANDREW B NEBERT TOMMY HENRY 9620 SW 90TH 11530 SW LOMITA PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03614 1S135DD-03615 HOCKETT MARTHA M BOUSE LINDA C 11502 SW LOMITA AVE 11470 SW LOMITA TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135DD-03616 1 S135DD-03617 MURRAY RICHARD D LOOFBOUROW DONALD IVAN&MARY P 11440 SW LOMITA 11410 SW LOMITA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135DD-03618 1S1 35DD-03620 BRADFORD GARY TR WANG PING-JUI KAI 305 E FIFTH 22600 SW 93RD TER THE DALLES,OR 97058 TUALATIN,OR 97062 1S135DD-03703 1S136CB-00890 PARKER JEROME W TRUSTEE BECKHAM PAUL D AND DEBORAH R 5320 SW MACADAM AVE 8485 SW PFAFFLE PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CC-00300 1S136CC-00301 HERBERHOLZ PAUL A&ANNA ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LIMITED 8400 SW PFAFFLE ST 11336 SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD#103 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 136CC-00400 MCGUIRE ROBERT J& 8470 SW PFAFFLE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 I - ,.. - t` -"--- RANT LIST au[ \ ' / i 11 nm r a �.sw_• r•o•MAMA ra S. IIII 1111 Mrs 111 1 ". . . .... .. . .... � -f.C //,, I is..%i/%i 1_•'•/.%%/:/I///ii// ,,", /y» _%/i:/// i �1 s Ilk ••••203•13•30.1 ITDCOOlont.E.O1 Li DIYILDCY IOWAN!,DAMP 131 IN 4 M $ 1'IL• rti v« $ MI I +v.,. -•4'�I _.1 iv- I,' � \.' !O LANDSCAPE NOTE9 ice;c ,. _ �.�Ica7► �►a. ga a / .::% » .«.Y..,« ...�.o..L . fY 3. iC:7^.TrIli. mmll1111111:••••••1V•111t1111•••1••111iNE∎•1111••1111•1Emif - minIM0[s!n 4. ,.« .«.... .... �. . « a . 2 Z_ gooDooD iv moon woo Pol.1 epee.AM VIM.V 1..WM 1.41,1101141 c.s.c Wet 1 ulo� N b R .r.. • .u....,.......e�.vi.•....w...s...o. ,.a.rw U 1 I .»a.3 wt-o• ILEIN QQg -W • r- ___I 1 rROJEGT DATA O J O i LOG roL _YI.II11 aw Q O LANDSCAPE PLAN d w.a.+,E. ....Y...m.Y.I.LOT PO.rGAM O Q,vo ai Ia.. - Go+ODc..L...u..no..L, j Yu G...OIL . . • r.o F aaS :=: -I el Q Q �TK / L4911yCYrlp�M1Qr(1.1RU.OVA �Mf�� 0H 40' . EC10000• .!i . A.pL..\ LEGEND g.INCE El III __ _ t MOWN I __y .W.isO COMBO LK iu ..I..K,W NM .M V : • �� .]WT..O.Y000..l.Q 10,RUI. Q Mil int „.. : ,.• .i P old✓ .0✓K ..mMrJ KNOT..MM. w 8 �.,n:a, lei A !" 0 n.� on.+.e....new».. W 7;74 El -0 iiir A FFt�a. 3 ..o,.,m u.s...o....:e.o...•• J`y ■ ....r..m. o�cY,s I.L. Q •.•.•p Yn.. :R M O W a I'Gone :.'ice _ a i. u. .c., .00.R. MOLD. ..4-03,2]., ` t 9 1 :mar ' fI v cw TY nAr .0.��, »� .... wwY :1 00 'K�C.I - •----: KE-0. NN.dit. TO I 1 �---1 "- LL,0.4-,'x s._s.-ss I. «:RS_ -� , \ .0' a >4 I a 1 I I- _ I O SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Q HL A A 2 N.. • • •5 K TRANKITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. \ SPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE 700 • PORTLAND,OR 97205 • (503)228-5230 • FAX(503)273-8169 September 13, 1999 Project#: 3737 James Waddle Waddle Design 1700 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 105 Portland, Oregon 97201 RE: Hall Corporate Center Access Analysis Dear Jim, This letter summarizes our analysis of the access driveway for the Hall Corporate Center on Hall Boulevard in Tigard, Oregon. In particular, the Hall Corporate Center driveway/Hall Boulevard intersection was evaluated with respect to potential impacts of a proposed increase in parking spaces. Additionally, analysis of conditions under build-out of adjacent properties was conducted. The 32,800 square foot office development has a single access off of Hall Boulevard north of Highway 99W.The driveway is shared by a day care center,a church property,and an undeveloped lot. The driveway provides access to a total of 117 parking spaces, including 19 for the day care center,24 spaces on church property,and 74 on Hall Corporate Center property).Until very recently, the office building was approximately 76% occupied (25,000 square feet). At this level of occupancy,utilization of the existing 98 parking spaces has been high. The property owner desires to construct 51 additional parking spaces to accommodate parking needs associated with full occupancy of the building. Originally, the developer arranged a shared parking agreement with the Brahma Premananda Ashram,which had been proposed for construction on an adjacent lot. However,the Ashram has not been constructed and the spaces that were expected to be available for use by the office by means of the parking agreement are not available.As a result,additional parking is needed to accommodate the existing office development. Access opportunities are limited due to the location of Highway 217 north of the site, and development west and south of the site. City of Tigard development code requirements limit to 100 the number of parking spaces served by a single driveway. Based on the finding that the driveway would operate safely and efficiently,and due to the lack of alternative access points,a variance was granted allowing the single driveway access to 121 parking spaces at the time that the office building was submitted for development. FILE NAME:H:\PROJFILE\3737\REPORT\3737RPT.WPD .` 1 Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:2 Specific issues addressed in this report include: • Existing weekday peak hour traffic operations and intersection queuing; • Expected trip generation associated with increase in traffic when the existing building is fully occupied; • Weekday peak hour level of service under full occupancy of the development; • Estimated trip generation and traffic operations under a reasonable build-out scenario of the adjacent properties; and, • City of Tigard parking requirements with respect to minimum and maximum parking ratios. Existing Conditions Hall Boulevard is a two-lane roadway in the site vicinity, with a 75-foot northbound left-turn lane into the site.The site driveway meets Hall Boulevard at an unsignalized T-intersection and has a 30- foot paved cross section at the approach to Hall Boulevard. Manual traffic counts were conducted at the intersection on mid-week days in August of 1999 to determine the existing traffic volumes at the study intersection. Traffic entering the day care center was also counted in order to more accurately assess the office-generated trips. Results of the traffic counts indicate that the weekday peak hours occur from 7:25 to 8:25 a.m.and from 4:45 to 5:45 p.m. The existing weekday peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 1. Existing Level of Service Analysis A level-of-service(LOS)analysis was conducted to determine existing traffic conditions. All LOS analyses described in this letter were performed in accordance with the procedures described in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 209, Third Edition). Typically,LOS"E"or better is acceptable for unsignalized intersections. A description of LOS and the criteria by which they are determined is available upon request. To ensure that the analysis was based on a worst-case scenario,the peak 15-minute flow rate during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours was used in the evaluation. For this reason, the analysis reflects conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The results of the level-of-service analysis are summarized in Table 1. FILE NAME:H:\PROJFILE\3737\REPORT\3737RPT.WPD Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:3 Table 1 Existing Weekday Level of Service Hall Corporate Center Access/Hall Boulevard Time Period Critical Movement I Critical V/C Critical Delay LOS AM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.07 7.5 B PM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.17 10.2 C V/C:volume-to-capacity ratio Critical Delay is expressed in average seconds per vehicle for the critical movement Table 1 shows that the study intersection operates at acceptable levels of service during both a.m. and p.m.peak hours.Further,the low volume-to-capacity ratio for the critical movement indicates considerable capacity for additional traffic. The level of service analysis worksheets are provided as Attachment A. It should be noted that actual operations may be better than indicated by the analysis for two reasons. First,the analysis treats the unstriped driveway as a single eastbound lane.However,sufficient width exists for eastbound drivers to separate into left-and right-turning movements at the Hall Boulevard approach.Second,the analysis does not include the opportunity for exiting left turns to make a two- stage left turn onto Hall Boulevard due to a painted median north of the left-turn lane. If operations were to become constrained, these considerations could be examined in more detail. Intersection Queuing Queues of northbound vehicles turning left into the site were estimated under weekday peak hour conditions.Similarly,eastbound queues (exiting traffic) were estimated to assess potential internal site circulation impacts. Intersection queuing was estimated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology for estimated queues at unsignalized intersections. The analysis provides the 95th- percentile maximum queue.In other words,95 percent of the time,the queue is expected to be less than or equal to the estimated queue length. The average queue length per vehicle was assumed to be 25 feet. The results of the queuing analysis are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Existing Weekday Intersection Queuing Estimate Eastbound Queues Northbound Left Turns Time Period Vehicles Feet Vehicles Feet AM Peak Hour 1 25 1 25 PM Peak Hour 1 25 1 25 Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon • Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:4 As the table shows, the methodology estimates that 95% of the time, queues will not exceed one vehicle. The estimates are consistent with field observation during the a.m. peak hour. Observed queues were infrequent and,when they occurred,tended to be only one vehicle in length. On a few occasions,two vehicles were observed to be queued at the intersection,but the duration of the queue was very short(less than 10 seconds).No queues exceeding two vehicles were observed. Therefore, northbound queues at the intersection can be accommodated by the existing northbound left turn lane. Similarly, eastbound queues are not shown to pose operational problems internal to the site, or to the day care center. Queuing analysis worksheets are provided as Attachment B. Future Conditions Analysis The future conditions analysis was conducted to determine whether operations at the Hall Boulevard/site driveway intersection will suffer from added traffic associated with full occupancy of the Corporate Center. The Hall Corporate Center was occupied at approximately 75% (25,000 square feet)when the traffic counts were conducted in August 1999.Despite the vacant office space, the 98 on-site parking spaces are highly utilized and weekday parking conditions are constrained. As such, it is anticipated that once the office development is fully occupied, a shortage of parking spaces will arise.The future conditions analysis reflect conditions that are expected to occur when the building is fully occupied. Estimated Future Trip Generation Future intersection operations at the driveway were evaluated to reflect the higher level of traffic that would be expected under full occupancy. Future trip generation was estimated by increasing the observed office generated traffic in proportion to the increase in building occupancy. The estimated trip generation is summarized in Table 3. Table 3 Estimated Trip Generation Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Day Care Center 30 25 55 25 30 55 Existing Office Occupancy(25 ksf) 55 5 60 5 35 40 Total Observed Trip Generation 85 30 115 30 65 95 Day Care Center 30 25 55 25 30 55 Full Office Occupancy(32.8 ksJ) 70 10 80 10 50 60 Estimated Future Trip Generation 100 35 135 35 80 115 Added Trip Generation 15 I 5 I 20 5 15 20 Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:5 As Table 3 shows,the trip generation estimates for the office development under 100%occupancy are approximately 80 and 60 vehicles during the a.m and p.m. peak hours, respectively. This corresponds to an increase of 20 peak hour trips from the traffic volume obtained from field observation. It should be noted that the trip generation shown in Table 3 is less than what was estimated for the original application for the office development(80 vehicles during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours). Therefore, the future conditions analysis does not reflect traffic conditions in excess of what has already been analyzed and approved for this site. Future Level-of-Service Analysis Peak hour level-of-service analysis at the driveway intersection was conducted to determine the impacts of added traffic related to additional parking spaces and/or full building occupancy. The results, summarized in Table 4, show that the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels. Level of service analysis worksheets are provided as Attachment A. Table 4 Future Level of Service Hall Corporate Center Access/Hall Boulevard Time Period Critical Movement I Critical V/C Ratio Critical Delay LOS AM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.09 8.7 B PM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.20 10.6 C V/C:volume-to-capacity ratio Critical Delay is expressed in average seconds per vehicle for the critical movement Build-Out Conditions Analysis The volume-to-capacity ratios in Table 4 indicate considerable residual capacity at the study intersection. Traffic operations were analyzed under build-out conditions at the site. The future development conditions were assumed to consist of similar office development on the adjacent vacant properties.Parcels to the south and west of the existing building are vacant and of comparable size to the subject property. As such,the reasonable build-out scenario includes total added square footage equal to 200% of the existing building. The added trip generation associated with the additional office square footage was estimated at 160 and 120 trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Through traffic volumes on Hall Boulevard were increased by 20% to reflect background growth in traffic over the next five to ten years. The results of the level-of-service analysis are summarized in Table 5. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Port/and, Oregon Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:6 Table 5 Weekday Level-of-Service Analysis, Build-Out Scenario Hall Corporate Center Access/Hall Boulevard Time Period I Critical Movement Critical V/C Ratio I Critical Delay LOS AM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.21 14.1 C PM Peak Hour Eastbound 0.56 22.2 D V/C:volume-to-capacity ratio Critical Delay is expressed in average seconds per vehicle for the critical movement As Table 5 shows, based on the analysis of the reasonable build-out conditions, the site access driveway intersection would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service if office development were to increase by 200%on parcels adjacent to the site. Northbound left-turn queues and eastbound queues were estimated for the build-out scenario described above.As in the existing conditions analysis,the Highway Capacity Manual methodology was used to estimate queues,which provides the 95th-percentile maximum queue.The results of the queuing analysis are shown in Table 6. Table 6 Weekday Intersection Queuing Estimate, Build-Out Scenario Eastbound Queues Northbound Left Turns Time Period Vehicles Feet Vehicles Feet AM Peak Hour 2 50 2 50 PM Peak Hour 4 100 1 100 Table 6 shows that under the build-out conditions analyzed,maximum northbound left-turn queues would be approximately 50 feet and would be accommodated by the existing 75-foot left turn lane on Hall Boulevard. Internal queues during the p.m. peak would be 100 feet, which might hinder movements to and from the day care center at times.If such a development plan were to take place, more consideration could be given to this issue. City of Tigard Parking Requirements The City of Tigard development code requirements provide both maximum and minimum parking ratios for new developments.Maximum ratios are defined for Type A and Type B zones,where Type A refers to areas with high transit accessibility.Tri-Met does not offer a bus route on Hall Boulevard near the site. Therefore, the development is located in a Type B zone. The City of Tigard requirements and the site specific parking ratios are summarized below in terms of spaces per 1,000 square feet of office floor area. Kitte/son&Associates, inc. Portland, Oregon Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:7 City of Tigard Development Code Minimum Parking Required: 2.7/1,000 square feet Maximum (Zone B): 4.1/1,000 square feet The 74 spaces currently available on Hall Corporate Center property yield a parking ratio of 2.3 spaces per thousand square feet. With the proposed increase of 51 spaces, the Corporate Center would be in compliance with City of Tigard parking code requirements. Hall Corporate Center Existing: (74 spaces/32.8 ksf) 2.3/1,000 square feet Proposed: (125 spaces/32.8 ksf) 3.8/1,000 square feet Findings • The intersection of the Hall Corporate Center driveway with Hall Boulevard currently operates at acceptable levels of service during both weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • On-street queuing at the study intersection is easily accommodated by the northbound left- turn lane on Hall Boulevard.The maximum of observed and estimated queues under existing conditions is two vehicles. • Anticipated full occupancy of the existing office development will result in approximately 20 added vehicle trips at the study intersections during weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • The study intersection would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the added traffic associated with full occupancy. • Under reasonable build-out conditions of the adjacent properties, traffic volumes at the site driveway would be approximately 295 and 240 during weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. • The study intersection would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service under the estimated build-out scenario. • Under estimated build-out traffic conditions of the adjacent properties, queuing of northbound vehicles entering the site would be accommodated by the existing northbound left-turn lane on Hall Boulevard. • The addition of 51 parking spaces would result in total parking supply of 125 spaces on the Corporate Office Center property, yielding a parking supply ratio of 3.8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office development. This is in compliance with City of Tigard parking minimum and maximum ratios of 2.7/1,000 and 4.1/1,000 square feet of office development. Conclusion The addition of 51 parking spaces to serve the existing Hall Corporate Center office building will not have an adverse impact on operations and safety at the existing access driveway/Hall Boulevard intersection. Kitte/son&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Jim Waddle Project:3737 September 13, 1999 Page:8 I trust this letter adequately addresses your needs at this time.If you have any questions,or if we can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to call us. Sincerely, KI TEL tN & ASSOCIATES, INC. udith Mark Vandehey, P.E. Project anager Principal ,0D PROFks s „5 (.0144:9 b }6, :. '. avtiC, 01 OREGON X4,9,A. VAN' al. 6 260 Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Attachment A Level of Service Analysis Worksheets Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Hall Corporate Center Project 3737 September, 1999 MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 12 : 56 : 22 Page 1-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc . -- Project 3737 Hall Corporate Center -- Tigard, Oregon ( Existing Traffic Volumes, Wee ay Hou J Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0 . 6 Worst Case Level Of Service : B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : II II II Base Vol : 60 315 0 0 365 25 10 0 20 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 60 315 0 0 365 25 10 0 20 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 PHF Volume : 71 375 0 0 435 30 12 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 71 375 0 0 435 30 12 0 24 0 0 0 I II II II I Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 0% 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 % Truck/Comb: 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE : 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE: 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 73 375 0 0 435 30 12 0 24 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 . 5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module : II II II Cnflict Vol : 464 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 896 xxxx 449 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1030 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 321 xxxx 820 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 93 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1030 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 298 xxxx 820 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 3 . 8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 12 . 6 xxxx 4 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 518 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 7 . 5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel : 3 40 . 6 0 . 0 7 . 2 0 . 0 Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 12 :57 :21 Page 1-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc . -- Project 3737 - _ • •orat- C- t- -- Ti•ard Ore•on Existing Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0 . 7 Worst Case Level Of Service : C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II II II Volume Module : Base Vol : 25 510 0 0 460 10 25 0 40 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 25 510 0 0 460 10 25 0 40 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 PHF Volume : 27 548 0 0 495 11 27 0 43 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 27 548 0 0 495 11 27 0 43 0 0 0 II ll II Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 0% 0% 0% 0% Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 1 . 00 Truck/Comb: 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE : 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE : 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 27 548 0 0 495 11 27 0 43 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 . 5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module : II II II Cnflict Vol : 505 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1075 xxxx 500 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 985 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 252 xxxx 773 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap : 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 97 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 985 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 245 xxxx 773 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 3 . 8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16 . 5 xxxx 4 . 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 423 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10 . 2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel : Q 0 . 2 0 . 0 9 .4 0 . 0 u /A/2.3 ' ,11 Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 12 :58 : 21 Page 1-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc . -- Project 3737 Hall Cor orate Center -- Tigard, Oregon Full Occupancy Volumes, Weekday AM Peak HouJ Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0 . 7 Worst Case Level Of Service : B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II e Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : II II II e Base Vol : 70 315 0 0 365 30 15 0 20 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 70 315 0 0 365 30 15 0 20 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 PHF Volume : 83 375 0 0 435 36 18 0 24 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 83 375 0 0 435 36 18 0 24 0 0 0 I II II II Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 09 094 094 094 Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 Truck/Comb: 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE : 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 .50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE : 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 85 375 0 0 435 36 18 0 24 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 .5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I Capacity Module : 11 II II e Cnflict Vol : 470 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 911 xxxx 452 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 1023 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 314 xxxx 817 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 92 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 1023 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 288 xxxx 817 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 3 . 8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 13 . 3 xxxx 4 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 457 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8 . 7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel : 35.' 0 . 7 0 . 0 8 . 3 A 0 . 0 11"= 41%-' , ,D1 Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 12 :59 :43 Page 1-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc . -- Project 3737 Hall Corporate Center -- Tigard, Oregon- (Full Occupancy Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Peak Ho ru Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 0 . 8 Worst Case Level Of Service : C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R e II II II e Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : II II II e Base Vol : 25 510 0 0 460 15 30 0 50 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 25 510 0 0 460 15 30 0 50 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 PHF Volume : 27 548 0 0 495 16 32 0 54 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 27 548 0 0 495 16 32 0 54 0 0 0 I II II II Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 0% 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 1 . 00 % Truck/Comb: 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE: 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE: 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 27 548 0 0 495 16 33 0 54 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 .5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Capacity Module : Cnflict Vol : 511 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1078 xxxx 503 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 979 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 252 xxxx 770 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap : 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 97 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 979 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 245 xxxx 770 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 3 . 8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16 . 9 xxxx 5 . 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 426 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10 . 6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel : 427 0 . 2 0 . 0 9 . 5 0 . 0 9 •.03 j .2' Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 13 :03 :17 Page 1-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project 3737 Ha • •• .. - - • - -- Tigard, Oregon Estimated Build-Out Traffic Volumes, Weekday AM Peak Hou Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1 .4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II e Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : II II II e Base Vol : 160 380 0 0 440 80 20 0 35 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 160 380 0 0 440 80 20 0 35 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 0 . 84 PHF Volume : 190 452 0 0 524 95 24 0 42 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 190 452 0 0 524 95 24 0 42 0 0 0 I II II II Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 0% 00 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 0 . 96 0 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 % Truck/Comb: 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 04 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE : 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE : 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 194 452 0 0 524 95 24 0 42 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 . 5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I Capacity Module : 11 II el e Cnflict Vol : 619 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1214 xxxx 571 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 869 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 210 xxxx 711 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap: 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 78 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 869 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 163 xxxx 711 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 5 . 3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 25 . 9 xxxx 5 .4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 320 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14 . 1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel : 1 . 6 0 . 0 (, 12 . 8 0 . 0 ' 11;2. 3'•2 % Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR MITIG8 Sun Aug 15, 1999 13 : 05 : 09 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kittelson & Associates, Inc . -- Project 3737 . 11 Cor.orate Center -- Tigard, Oregon :uild-Out Traffic Volumes, Weekday PM Pea Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 existing driveway ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2 . 0 Worst Case Level Of Service : D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I I I I I e Control : Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights : Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : II II II e Base Vol : 40 610 0 0 550 20 60 0 120 0 0 0 Growth Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Initial Bse : 40 610 0 0 550 20 60 0 120 0 0 0 User Adj : 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 PHF Adj : 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 PHF Volume : 43 656 0 0 591 22 65 0 129 0 0 0 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol . : 43 656 0 0 591 22 65 0 129 0 0 0 I II II II Adjusted Volume Module : Grade : 0% 0% 0% 0% % Cycle/Cars : 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 0 . 98 0 . 00 1 . 00 % Truck/Comb: 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 PCE Adj : xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx 1 . 00 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cycl/Car PCE: 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 0 . 50 1 . 00 Trck/Cmb PCE: 1 .50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 1 .50 2 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 00 Adj Vol . : 43 656 0 0 591 22 65 0 130 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module : MoveUp Time : 2 . 1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3 .4 xxxx 2 . 6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 5 . 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 . 5 xxxx 5 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I Capacity Module : II II II Cnflict Vol : 613 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1301 xxxx 602 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap. : 875 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 187 xxxx 686 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj Cap : 1 . 00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 . 95 xxxx 1 . 00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap. : 875 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 178 xxxx 686 xxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II Level Of Service Module : Stopped Del : 4 . 3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 31 .4 xxxx 6 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 351 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 22 .2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * D * * * * ApproachDel : 0 . 3 0 . 0 14 . 8 0 . 0 5 ,os fr., ,Su 3 Traffix 6 . 8 . 1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Kittelson, Portland, OR Attachment B Queuing Analysis Worksheets Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Hall Corporate Center Project 3737 September, 1999 - CALCULATION/DESIGN RECORD Kittelson . Associates, Inc. / Transportation PlanninglTr Associates, Engineering DATE ��S 9g 3 N. 610 5W Alder,Suite 700 Portland OR 97205 PROJECT M 7 7 Telephone:(503)228-5230 Fax:(503)273-8169 PROJECT NAME /7A// CO rD�.►r�1. CC dot�'e'� E-mail:Info 0 kittelson.com // http://www.kittelsan.coml t SUBJECT BY .J 4 4 SHEET: I OF z UNS;GNALLZ D INTE?SECTIONS 9G!^ .lercer..t11e(vent capacity(ven/hl= :ca `0 IV + I I I I i I / 1 I r• I 1 I 1 I . l i 1 I /1 �! ,LrC C • l I I I i I 1 I I l I/ ...,-/ I G I I i ' 1 /i I I I I / I ace s° I i I I I I I I /(/1 X/I 600 I I /1/17 gee - �0 I I I i i I i l I i I Sao / sec ` 1 1 N/.1I •••• ! I too aI ...•./ . -,f lee I I ir/�V_,/I I 1 • - i I I I I / Z /„1,, I 1 I I 160 x • i ! I I I /' I I I I I . i l l 4( i t i 1 1 zc cr.c.: / iv. -f-r I i t I 11 . : I :r% i i 1 ______----- . Q 0 2 0 s 0.5 0.: 1.0 1.: 1 a sat'..ra:.cr c..'e:ree x (-I • :r.ier,al = 1;4 h • Figure :0-.?. 9_.. gerc_ :le queue ten yc: e:=zr=•.:on a: :cr:Lir:I Ze_. :r.:ersec::oz:.;. TNTcRSEC.T_Orl: /la// Corpor*f` a-tc• 4r;4/41'1147 / /a// 3iird. �� FYI J f VD hi mes , Gtlee d ,4�N (p4i) Peck h� C.pn)DLT�0NS ^1 . i \J/C.- g J is =� Q,ae.le, Lna.' CA - • omC2� � I �y 30 4.—• � S It 4- l_e •a . (I) I m. f GNI f c all* or • it 17 • ' t /I 4N t I' ' t P cl a 1. • CALCULATION/DESIGN RECORD Kittelson - • ssociates, Inc. /14(Tranaportatlon PlanningITrafflc Engineering DATE /�5/g q PROJECT 0 ,�7�7 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Portland OR 97205 Telephone:(503)228-5230 // n PROJECT /� / Fax:(503)273-8169 PROJECT NAME Ali/ 1.°��rafl- &•14-/ E-mail:Info 0 kittelson.com hap://www.kinelson.com/ SUBJECT BY J SHEET 0 2 OF Z U 4SIGNALIZ D INTERSECTIONS GS!:-., cercentile(veal capscty(yen/h1=• • SC I ^ 16CC i 1 1 I ! i I : I/ r, i. i I : I I 1 A /∎ i2.Cr G r C I 1 i I I I I I V I/ I g c 4 i I I i I I I I . I I� / acc ,° i i I I i I I I // _iI 6CA t� I• I I I I I ' /���� 1300 35� v I '1" f zcc -,-:) 1n I 1 I i I / I I/i 150 r � 1 1 1 N,//1 : I I 1 //// ,r.;/ 1 / I 100 1 I I • : 1 I I e /;,(( ,� �1 I I I I I I 4�' X� V % ( J I - 41/Z,1 ,. I I I I 50 ' 1 • I 1 I I I ..:/r ,V I I I I I a . _ I I I I I 3 I I ✓i /I� I `I I I I 1 I J -H i 2C /I i I Y // I 1 I I 1 / l 1 i . !I I • C 0_ 0- by 0.5 0.. 1.7 1.2 1 's .:ra::cr degree X H • • r.ieria1 = 114 it Figure re :0-.?. rf:h.gert:_' queue length e:::: _:.:on a: :ins:::l:zed in:er;ec:ions. TNTcRSEtTr i/t Ad/ A7•r*1i Ce.,fci driveway /7,141/ 2/✓4' /4 ox;4+a1 1a;id 0 / GJ.ctkdGy "1/y► (Pm) ?ta4 Avi C0A)0Z.rZo�vs : PPr 'lo Iuwi • Sle) C e�y aiji �. j go) 55 --v a.. Coq zQ••e a-- �� .Z 1 = •w-- 3 ) z �► 4... C c c es .‘14i e . Nitt e INt e 1% it r 1 V 10 ^' V` In \., `: �. , &ao iech Pporf S VLMK Consulting Engineers *11 -- 3933 S.W.KELLY AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-4393 (503)222-4453/FAX (503)248-9263 STORMWA TER REPORT for HALL CORPORATE CENTER ADDITIONAL PARKING CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON for Waddle Design/Planning/Architecture Portland, Oregon 97201 c\pPROFf5 14,9'• `Lc - �( OREGON QQ S }'25.�°" FC EXPIRES DEC. 31, 1999 VLMK Job Number 99294 BY HUYNH TRAN August 30, 1999 I STORM WATER REPORT HALL CORPORATE CENTER ADDITIONAL PARKING VLMK No. 99294 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON August 30, 1999 By:Huynh Tran NARRATIVE This is a project for additional parking for Hall Corporate Center, located at the southwest corner of SW Hall Boulevard and Highway 217 in the City of Tigard, Oregon. The existing site has 21,057 square feet of grass which will be developed into the parking lot consisting of 15,431 sf of paved area and 6,076 sf of landscaping. Stormwater runoff is designed to be collected in catch basins, detained within the underground piping, and treated with the StormFilter unit prior to discharge into an existing 8" storm line to the south. DESIGN DATA Runoff flows are calculated using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrology method from King County Public Works and Unified Sewerage Agency(USA) rainfall data. Santa Barbara method is also used to calculate the water detention storage requirement and sized the water quality orifices in the manhole. The Manning equation from Softdesk-Autocad program is used to size the pipes. Pre-development Conditions: Grass (Unified Sewerage Agency) • Total site area: 21,507 s.f. Rainfall Intensity: 3.90 in./hr @ 25year Curve Number CN: 85 Time of concentration: 28.7 minutes Post Development Conditions: Paved parking • Total site area: 21,507 s.f. Impervious: 15,431 s.f. Landscaping: 4,986 s.f. (Excluding bumper overhang) Curve Number CN: 98 Time of concentration: 2.5 minutes. _>Use 5 minutes C:10drawing 99294\STSCALCREPORT.Doc I CALCULATION SUMMARY 1. Runoff Calculation: Santa Barbara Urban Hydrology Method from King County Public Works Events 2yr 5yr l0yr 25ry Pre. (cfs) 0.1 0.14 0.17 0.21 Post(cfs) 0.27 0.35 0.4 0.46 2. Pipe Size Design: Using Soft desk Manning Equation • From CB#1 to MH: 134 ft of 36" dia. PVC pipe. • From CB#2 to MH: 18 ft of 8" dia. PVC pipe. • From MH to Filter Vault: 3 ft of 6" dia. PVC pipe. • From Filter Vault to Existing: 40 ft of 8" dia. PVC pipe 3. Water Quality: Using U.S.A. & Stormwater Management • Water Detention Volume Required: 636 cu.ft. (Santa Barbara Method) • Detention Pipe Storage Design: 953 cu.ft. 134 ft of 36" pipe = Volume of 947 cu.ft. 18 ft of 8" pipe = Volume of 6 cu.ft Total Storage = 953 cu.ft. • Pollution Flow Control of Detention Manhole 2-year bottom orifice diameter: 2.04 inch 5-year middle orifice diameter: 1.25 inch 10-year top orifice diameter: 0.69 inch • Water Quality Release Rate: 0.00268 cfs (U.S.A. Method) • Water Quality Treatment: (Stormwater Management/Linear Storm Filter) Requirement: 0.08 Cartridge Use: 1 Cartridge in 3'x 10' Vault C:\Odrawing1992941STSCALCR EPORT.Doc 0 \ I . . . I I 1 1 1:1 I I I I I I quiiiiii i 1 I r- I - -....-________...-____.- MIME, ••■• Filli \ - ---. ----........._. 441f.fr=) ;a:STING 1 ----\ .44b .. -------...............\ I I I I I DRIVEWAY f EXISTING \\\ 1 __---.............., I I I I I 12 1 -I HOUSE \ .'.. 1111111 I._ \ / . I I I I I I I I 1 ..\\*\\\ ..._ I 1 \ I N 1 1 , i IF - I \I : N.N.j\ I . L . 51 31 PEI:RISKTt Ii'l:-1'.: I 1 I. -r-----, .:t i 1 _._., L.,....,W \ ----_—_. 1 N...1 \\\\ I I 1 i i -...k i...1, I .,c , 1 .1 1 1 i Hi 1 1 1 ___i_______ ,,,,......,,, ......7....„ ,„,....).., N4 1 1.: ---. • i .i-iNic I 1 231 i ! ..-Ir: ---- AREA CB2 1E 221.3.AREA CB1 HALL PARKING LOT I J 1 i .7t1 1 c, i , .a.._, ' .TER SE NICE TOI ""'"'..-.-.--. Ill 1 I:-----/- L- . 1 . AREA=8107642.2.. SOFT. tEmW 2C2,48:4 215:5043115sFF IMPERsiTE VICUS 7435 SO.FT. IN::: 7324.5 SF 0 r.....---:-..-=a... . • 1 I t i ..; n.. 'INCLUDE: ii S:GN t•ittl I t • I ' FIRE Y ,TER Fl IE OUT 222.2 4,986 SF LANDSCAPING(EXCIJJDES BUMPER OVERHANG)23 FASEUENT ' . DOMES IC WATE :d I Li I IRRIGA ION WATER . X I • CI 474`,..\ ,Thr ,i,.. z • I . F11:-...: H- NEW DET. M.N. RIM 224.5 1 15.bs- sTs I 115.007- \ : t z : : IE IN 220.65 E. (3§I\ ,...I • .c.r. -..1 I WATER v .... m •••:(4114:\ . i -- _I. il I-- IE IN 222.05 N. (8) IE OUI 220.45 S. (a.) 130 LF 36" STSIDET. PlIa) —.40) 41,..*:::'. . b •. >'• ck- i VIP i . pi \-.i../ I --mi. . i 1. . : I wATrq EER`.11:11/T . I 6 F 1 N Ro o _NEW 2S2T405R M F IL TE R ----- - '.'• EMPLE AD HALL 0F CE PARK lib .., a 8 1 . I ?...; 4- .., I ,./ ; ;1-4340w . IE IN 220.4 8" —EX. SODEWALK. EASEMENT/INCLUDES 8" SHARED FIRE WAIF; H.,,,L :4 pOR. JEW L,N :- PATE IN 218.9 4M8 I i 8 RIBI —02 Ili I I 1 i . ra . • , • , . I ---- ---.1-1&= _D w -si De:by R----/-1Y-:=416`— -----1" "pw' --F w- • al/C--7--- 11-t ______(-R.-_-__-_----r.. .— '4 Alitt---4.7—.-- '.1 OW-----..-iv • nw- FW -It.•-=--.7..a1-=- ' nr---i,- / / 0.0321 cis TREATMENT FLOW / I \___._ 4.,V cs 0.56 cfs MAX. FLOW ..._ 3"..Kitl.E.TING PRESSURE SAN (TO H.ALL BUILOING)_ 0 --AtCESS-0181E ..., 3" PROPOSED PRESSURE SAN (TO TEMPLE) I vs CONNECT 8" - _.45gb _ c.* / STS TO EXISTING ‘ 0- - CATCH BASIN EXISMG . • \Al. RIM EL 221.69 I : VERIFY EXISTING I.E.A.1 _______ __ IE: IE NE. a- IN 218.7■ - ' 1.71 ____________-_ ..______....._____ TER .1,..... --,■--..... ..-----■1,...mx■ ....... ....,... 7.7 ..,.__-_- .. -- - .., .. I ---- — - ....) ER EX. FENCE-----'ENCE----2" r________ (----c-T..:s . --- ---- I,.. 7 N. N. 1 1 C/\\ I . .IIT 156 1 I. I I 1 UTILITY PLAN eirh _ 1 . 1 . 1 1 I --------- I. I !I I SCALE: 1 20' I / ■1 EXISTING • , I I I CHILD CARE I — I I FACILITY I i , ,ce: _ . __. =Mb l•■. ■••■■,..• •■•• •■■■ .•■■■■■■•••■• •■• •■■ ...... ..... •1•••■•■■■ •■ emEr ■■•■•■•■ ...■ •■■■ •••101ailiiiIMMIMMD - - 411•1■1ffigaraddd.hr. WEN .MMI• : 1 g, I I t 1 • • 41. 11 1.r.r.._ i.....+ LL.! 1 L411 :1 1 ...... -- -_____: I 1 • • I 1 ; tr: 1 I I I , I ; 1 ----- 1 4: , :.1 : 0 CALCULATIONS 0 8/25/99 HALL PARKING LOT 99294 , 4.1 isor 441 s KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.2 I B 1:INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2'-SBUHYD ' P 3 -MODIFIED SBUHYD 4-ROUTE 5-ROUTE2 6-ADDHYD 7-BASEFLOW 8-PLOTHYD 9-DATA 10-RDFAC 11 -RETURN TO DOS PRE-DEVELOPMENT RUNOFFCALCULATTON ENTER OPTION: 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: • 1 -S.C.S.TYPE-1A 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S.TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR),DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCHES) 2,24,2.5 ********************S.C.S.TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION******************** ********* 2-YEAR>24-HOUR STORM ****, 2.50"TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV),CN(PERV),A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV),TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .5,85,0,98,28.7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .5 85.0 .0 98.0 28.7 - 1 - - Z I 'ON NISV 2io i cu`(A'I3dNII)NO`(A/13dI11I)v`(11I3d)NO`(A)13d)V :11aLN3 v******** 'IV.LO.L +,Sb'£ **s• L1RIOIS 2I11OH-111 HVaA-OI ********************NOLLn812LLSIQHi-3aA.L'SD'S******************** Sb'£tZOi (sal13NI)&33ZId`(2If1oH)•OLLVwIf1Q`(2Id3200311.3 :11aLN3 NOLLff1.11ISIQ'T I` ANIV'd V I-adA.L'S'O'S :NOLLd0 Y1RIOIS AdID3dS 3'II3 VJNCI 1,\11IO1S- £ Y�RIO LS NDIS3Q AVU-L-Z VI-3dAI'S'O'S- I SNOLLdO IARIOIS HdV?IDOaQAH 33ONn2I ONLLndWOD 21O3 UOFLL3YJ SDS/HflEIS JA-n3)IOA,_( ?Iv-d " S30) L'8Z 0"86 0' 0'S8 S' ND V ND V (S3.LnNIIADDI SnoIA2I3d N1 SnoIA2I3d (SauDd)v niv S. :Lno-.LNRTd VI CI L'8Z`86`0`S8`617' I 'ON NISVEI)IO3 DI`(A213dYsII)NO`(A2I3di u)H`(12I3d)NO`(11I3d)V =2I3.LN3 ******* **(113d2Id'IV.LO,L uOI'£ *** 1Ai2IO.L ?I11OH-bZ;: -S ********************NOLLnUIN.LSIQ VT-3dAJ. S'O'S******************** i'£`iZ`S (s3HONI)&Daud`(2if1OH)NOLLd2InU`(avaij w :UaLN3 NOLLnanLLSIU TIdANIV2i VI-3dA.L'S'O'S :NOLLdO NRIOIS A31D 1dS 3"IId VI CI MOB- £ YV2IO LS NDIS3Q AVQ-L-Z VI-3dA.L'S'O'S- I :SNOLLdo Y�I2IO.LS r -SZIZ (u-n0)r10 b6Z66 .LO1 ONDRIVd'1 IWH A1`"` '�f4� S.43 • }IV3d s 66/SZ/8 88Ib £81 • n :.z�;.� ad-110)10A 0A (SIIH)xvad.L (s33)a-xri3d L•8Z 0.86 0• 0.58 S• S• Na V Na V (SaLnNINI)a.L Sf10IA2Iad➢1II SnOIA2iad (Sauv)vauv :1110-.I.NRId VI NCI L•8186 0 S8 6b i 'ON MIS VU 2IO.d a.L`(A2IadNII)Na`(AvIadwi)v`(Auad)Na YAbad)v :2I3LNa YYYYYYYYY aatii Iviat;.W i V.4D Qllo� Q1iA i....YYYY ********************NOLLfURLLSIQ VI-341A.1.•S•a•S ******************** 6•£bZ SZ (SaHD1%1I)di0a2Id`(2If10H)NOLLd2If1Q`(13VaA)6a2I3:1131Na NOLLf1U1/LLSIQ •S•a•S :NOLLdO IN2I01S AdlaadS 3'II3VIVQI IMS- £ 1/112IO.LS NDISaQ AVQ-L- Z VI-adA.L•S•a•S- :SNOLLdO I/111I0IS HdV2ID01IQAH 330Nn2I DNLLndINOD 110.4 QOH.LaNI SDS/Hf1US 4- L8b£ • _ f,,V%r!LO'L•t rnfi ' (u-naYI0A (S2IH)xdad-i. -(sda) a-xvad L•81 0.86 0• 0•S8 S• S• Na V Na V (S3LnNB�I)a L SnOIA2IadNII SnOIA2Iad (sa2IDv)va w b6Z66 .LO'I D■Ixf1Vd T1VH :.I.f10-1NR1d VIVA L•8Z 86 0 S8 617• 66/SZ/8 0 8/25/99 HALL PARKING LOT 99294 POSTDEYE ikitkikUNOFF'CALCULATTON SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S.C.S.TYPE-IA 2-7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S.TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER:FREQ(YEAR),DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24 2.5 ******************** S.C.S.TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION******************** 2-YEAR:24-HOUR STORM ****•2.50"TOTAL PRECIP ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV),A(IMPERV),CN(IMPERV),TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 .0833 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 .1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) a 7 � i 67 ' 3557 ENTER[d:][path]filename[.ext]FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST2YR SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S.C.S.TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S.TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR),DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCI-IES) 5 24 3.1 ******************** S.C.S.TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION******************** -4- 8/25/99 HALL PARKING LOT 99294 ********* UI� TORMx irt 3 0 10TAI=PRECIPy ENTER: A(PERV),CN(PERV),A(IMPERV),CN(IMPERV),TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 0.0833 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 .1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FI) 767 itiY 4586 ENTER[d:lfpath)filename[.extl FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST5YR SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 -S.C.S.TYPE-IA 2-7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S.TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER:FREQ(YEAR),DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24 3.45 ********************S.C.S.TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** *********'10-Y AR 22HOURSTORM ****;3.457. TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV),A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV),TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 0.0833 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 .1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .49 7.67 5193 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: -5- 8/25/99 HALL PARKING LOT 99294 1 -S.C.S.TYPE-IA 2 -7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 -STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S.TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR),DURATION(HOUR),PRECIP(INCHES) 25 24 3.90 ********************S.C.S.TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** 25-YEAR.24.-HOUR STORM.*m 3.90'.'TOTAL PRECIP.'********* ENTER: A(PERV),CN(PERV),A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV),TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 0.0833 DATA PRINT-OUT: - AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 .1 PEAK-Q(CFS). T-PEAK(HRS),. VOL(CU-FT) .56: k*' 7.67' a - 5978 ENTER]d:][pathifilename[.ext]FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST25YR -6- Thursday, November 11, 199 Hall Parking Addition 11/10/99 POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF CALCULATION • 2YEAR: ENTER OPTION: 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-IA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2 24 2.5 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .27 7.67 3557 ENTER[d][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST-2YR • 5YEAR S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 5 24 3.1 C:1Odrawing1992941R UNOFF.doc I Thursday, November 11, 1999 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 5-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.10" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .35 7.67 4586 ENTER[d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST-5YR • 10YEAR S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10 24 3.45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. I 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .40 7.67 5193 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST-10YR • 25YEAR S.C.S. TYPE-IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 25 24 3.9 C:10drawin g1992941R U NO F F.doc Thursday, November 11, 1999 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-IA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0.1395 85 0.3592 98 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .5 .1 85.0 .4 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .46 7.67 5978 ENTER[d:][path]filename[ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: POST-25YR C:10drawing1992941R U NO F F.doc KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4.21B 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 -MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 -ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7-BASEFLOW 8 -PLOTHYD 9-DATA 10 -RDFAC 11 -RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: 10 R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY: 1 -POND 4-INFILTRATION POND 2-TANK 5 -INFILTRATION TANK 3 - VAULT 6 -GRAVEL TRENCH/BED 2 ENTER: TANK DIAMETER(ft), EFFECTIVE STORAGE DEPTH(ft) 3, 2 ENTER[d:][path]filename[ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH: POST-25YR PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK= .46 CFS ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.21 ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIMUM): 3-, ENTER[d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1: POST-10YR ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.17 ENTER [d:][path]filename[ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2: C:\Odrawing1992941STSCALCR EPORT.Doc POST-5YR ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.14 ENTER[d][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 3: POST-2YR ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(cfs): 0.1 ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAMETER(in) 3, 2, 10 RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW= .15 FT SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y-YES, N -NO Y SPECIFY: R- REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C -CONTINUE R SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: TANK 2) TANK DIAMETER(ft), STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 3.00, 2.00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: POST-25YR 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(cfs): .21 6)NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 3 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: POST-1OYR TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .17 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: POST-5YR TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .14 TEST HYD 3 FILENAME: POST-2YR TARGET RELEASE(cfs): .10 7)NUMBER-OF-ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft),RISER-DIAM(in): 3, 2.00, 10 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: YES ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 2217 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs) 0.16 DIA.= 2.04 INCHES MIDDLE ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(cfs), HEIGHT(ft) 0.04, 1.1 DIA.= 1.25 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) C:1Odrawing\99294\STSCALCREPORT.Doc 1.4 DIA.= .69 INCHES ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... TRIAL TANK-LENGTH STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 442.9 2217 892 .77 .10 2 310.6 1554 855 .94 .11 3 240.8 1205 806 1.15 .13 4 201.0 1006 751 1.30 .15 5 175.5 878 721 1.45 .16 6 159.9 800 698 1.56 .17 7 149.7 749 681 1.66 .18 8 142.9 715 670 1.74 .19 9 138.4 692 661 1.79 .19 10 135.3 677 654 1.84 .20 11 133.1 666 649 1.88 .20 12 131.4 657 645 1.91 .20 13 130.1 651 641 1.93 .20 14 129.2 646 639 1.95 .21 15 128.5 643 638 1.97 .21 16 128.1 641 638 1.98 .21 17 127.8 639 637 1.98 .21 18 127.6 638 637 1.99 .21 19 127.4 637 636 1.99 .21 20 127.3 637 636 2.00 .21 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .46 .21 .21 2.00 636 TEST HYD 1: .40 .17 .17 1.48 530 TEST HYD 2: .35 .14 .14 1.19 440 TEST HYD 3: .27 .10 .10 .79 270 SPECIFY: D- DOCUMENT, R-REVISE, A- ADJUST ORIF, E -ENLARGE, S - STOP PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .46 .21 .21 2.00 636 TEST HYD 1: .40 .17 .17 1.48 530 TEST HYD 2: .35 .14 .14 1.19 440 TEST HYD 3: .27 .10 .10 .79 270 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D TANK (FLAT GRADE) RISER-HEAD TANK-DIAM STOR-DEPTH TANK-LENGTH STORAGE-VOLUME 2.00 FT 3.00 FT 2.00 FT 127.3 FT 636 CU-FT C:V0drawing\99294\STSCALCR EPORT.Doc TRIPLE ORIFICE RESTRK,1'OR: DIA(INCHES) HT(FEET) Q-iviAX(CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE: 2.04 .00 .160 MIDDLE ORIFICE: 1.25 1.10 .040 TOP ORIFICE: .69 1.40 .010 ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .00 .00 .0 .0 .20 .05 .0 .0 .40 .07 .0 .0 .60 .09 .0 .0 .80 .10 301.2 .0 1.00 .11 374.8 .0 1.10 .12 410.3 .0 1.20 .14 444.7 .0 1.40 .16 509.2 .0 1.60 .18 566.1 .0 1.80 .20 611.6 .0 2.00 .21 637.4 .0 2.10 .47 637.4 .0 2.20 .95 637.4 .0 2.30 1.56 637.4 .0 2.40 1.90 637.4 .0 2.50 2.10 637.4 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: .0 MINUTES/INCH PEAK-INFLOW(CFS) PEAK-OUTFLOW(CFS) OUTFLOW-VOL(CU-FT) .46 .21 4382 INITIAL-STAGE(FT) TIME-OF-PEAK(HRS) PEAK-STAGE-ELEV(FT) .00 8.00 2.00 PEAK STORAGE 636 CU-FT INFLOW/OUTFLOW DATA PRINT-OUT: T(HRS) QI(CFS) QO(CFS) EL(FT) T(HRS) QI(CFS) QO(CFS) EL(FT) .00 .00 .00 .00 7.50 .27 .10 .74 .17 .00 .00 .00 7.67 .46 .11 .98 .33 .00 .00 .00 7.83 .43 .17 1.55 .50 .00 .00 .00 8.00 .24 .21 2.00 .67 .01 .01 .04 8.17 .17 .21 1.98 .83 .01 .01 .04 8.33 .14 .19 1.78 1.00 .01 .01 .04 8.50 .14 .18 1.65 1.17 .01 .01 .04 8.67 .12 .17 1.54 1.33 .02 .02 .08 8.83 .10 .16 1.42 1.50 .02 .02 .08 9.00 .10 .15 1.32 1.67 .02 .02 .08 9.17 .10 .14 1.24 C:10drawin g1992941ST SCA LC R E P O R T.Doc 1.83 .03 .03 .12 9.33 .10 .13 1.17 2.00 .03 .03 .12 9.50 .10 .12 1.12 2.17 .03 .03 .12 9.67 .10 .12 1.09 2.33 .03 .03 .12 9.83 .10 .12 1.06 2.50 .03 .03 .12 10.00 .10 .11 1.03 2.67 .04 .04 .16 10.17 .10 .11 1.01 2.83 .04 .04 .16 10.33 .10 .11 .99 3.00 .04 .04 .16 10.50 .10 .11 .97 3.17 .04 .04 .16 10.67 .09 .11 .94 3.33 .04 .04 .16 10.83 .08 .11 .90 3.50 .04 .04 .16 11.00 .08 .10 .86 3.67 .05 .05 .20 11.17 .08 .10 .82 3.83 .05 .05 .20 11.33 .08 .10 .80 4.00 .06 .06 .29 11.50 .08 .10 .79 4.17 .06 .06 .29 11.67 .08 .10 .78 4.33 .06 .06 .29 11.83 .08 .10 .77 4.50 .06 .06 .29 12.00 .08 .10 .77 4.67 .06 .06 .29 12.17 .08 .10 .76 4.83 .07 .07 .39 12.33 .08 .10 .75 5.00 .07 .07 .39 12.50 .08 .10 .74 5.17 .07 .07 .39 12.67 .07 .10 .73 5.33 .07 .07 .39 12.83 .06 .10 .72 5.50 .07 .07 .39 13.00 .06 .09 .71 5.67 .08 .08 .51 13.17 .06 .09 .69 5.83 .09 .09 .60 13.33 .06 .09 .68 6.00 .09 .09 .60 13.50 .06 .09 .67 6.17 .09 .09 .60 13.67 .06 .09 .66 6.33 .09 .09 .60 13.83 .06 .09 .64 6.50 .09 .09 .60 14.00 .06 .09 .63 6.67 .11 .09 .61 14.17 .06 .09 .62 6.83 .13 .09 .62 14.33 .06 .09 .61 7.00 .13 .09 .64 14.50 .06 .07 .40 7.17 .16 .09 .66 14.67 .06 .05 .19 7.33 .18 .09 .69 14.83 .06 .00 .00 SPECIFY: F -FILE, N -NEWJOB, P-PRINT IF/OF, R-REVISE, S - STOPS C:10drawing1992941STSCA LCREPORT.Doc page 2 • WATER QUALITY RELEASE RATE (U.S.A. Method) Q (cfs) = (0.36")(Impervious area)/48hrs Q (cfs)= (0.36/12 ft)(15431 ft^2)/(48 * 3600 sec) = 0.00268 cfs • WATER QUALITY TREATMENT Stormwater Management Manual-Linear StormFilter Method Required: # Cartridge=Qtreat cfs * (449gpm/cfs)/(15gpm/cartridge) # Cartridge= 0.00268 cfs * (449gpm/cfs)/(15gpm/cartridge) =0.08 cartridge Design: # Cartridge= 1 cartridge FLOWCB2.txt Hall Parking Addition 99294 11/10/99 Rational Method Given Input Data: Description RATIONAL METHOD FOR RUNOFF CALC. FOR CB#2 Area Area Coef Tc Intensity Flow Description ft2 min in/hr cfs CB1 7422.0000 0.9500 5.0000 3.9000 0.6313 Support Data: Page 1 pipesize.txt Hall Parking Addition 99294 11/10/99 pTe, c �1 � 4 Manning Pipe Calculator �+�., Given Input Data: Shape Circular Solving for Diameter Full , A Diameter Dea rte`t S Depth •. ' Flowrate 0.6000 cfs Slope 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n 0.0130 Computed Results: Area 0.2065 ft2 Wetted Area 0.2065 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 19.3293 in Perimeter 19.3293 in Velocity 2.9060 fps Hydraulic Radius 1.5382 in Percent Full 100.0000% Full flow Flowrate 0.6000 cfs Full flow velocity 2.9060 fps Critical Information Critical depth 4.8500 in Critical slope 0.0097 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.3516 fps Critical area 0.1790 ft2 Critical perimeter 13.2119 in Critical hydraulic radius 1.9512 in Critical top width 6.1527 in Specific energy 0.6143 ft Minimum energy 0.6062 ft Froude number 0.6662 Flow condition Subcritical Page 1 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES rte_ • CITY OFTICARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Comur ;lilt (Development CITT rn Or TIOAAD.OACaOPI Community [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six[6)Months) ra 'rrA(Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: - STAFF AT PRE-APP.: _r - APPLICANT: ,gym (tJo,dd I e AGENT: Phone:[ I Phone: I I PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: / 8? SW Fig I) TAX MAP[SI/LOT#LS1: /S/MD/q 7 /.5-00 /x,00/ /7-1:4 / NECESSARY APPLICATION[Sl: ,574 Ozvzir' PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Cns-1 a --}07 2sJ,' Sy'✓�re. lL o4Ic e �yi'id/r� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: / ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: � -10 C.I.T.AREA: _ FACILITATOR: PHONE: L503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6-a00 sq. ft. Average lot width: ,So ft. Maximum building height: 95 ft. Setbacks: Front v ^ft. Side c�/2.0 ft. Rear 0—ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: S'S % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: is %. [Refer to Code Section 18. " 27-- l oco (7,/,-,.d ^ a j'tI ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1Y2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 MON-Residential Application/Planning Olvlslen Section PECIAL SETBAC EETS: feet from the centerline of • > ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. - FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1301 PECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT-EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/z) of the building's height; and • The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.) IIT AND ACCESS /keciii; 3-)zLd •REQUIRED parking for this type of use: ‘,2. 7 ivov z"), (/�poo /✓r' - ' y �" Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): ores-A p.rkj ade d 4 „�,,,/or/2 ;6s 070C SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) Handicapped Parking: :- All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and hs in con4enient locations. J Minimum number'of accesses: / Minimum access width: d . Minimum pavement width: 0at* ' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.165 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Iesldentlal Appllcatlon/Plinnln9 Division Section • WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS • WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 IONS AREA REQUIREMENTS . Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.165.0801 LEAK VISION AREA The-Gity-r�quires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 019 NON-Residential Application/t'IalRIR'Division Sadao "(.SIGHS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of . Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.0.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USAI BUFFER STANDARDS,R 8 0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-ResldenUal Anollcatioi/llannine Division Section • WATER QUALITY FA■,ILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R 8 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM1 WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-ResidonUal Application/Planning Division Section Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: • Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.100) (-Tait REMOVAL PLANQUIREMENTS_ A TREE PAN—FOR-I-WE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18390.030.0 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Ohrlslon Section MITIGATION PLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) C�ARRnT�-' The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32] CODE CHAPTERS—) 18.330 18.390 18.520 18.715 18.765 18.795 18.350 18.420 18.530 — 18.730 18.775 18.797 18.360 18.430 18.620 18.745 18.780 . 18.800 18.370 18.510 18.705 18.755 18.790 IMPACT STUDY • IVS-a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section (1IEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPL -ANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICA ION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat no • g request with the Washington Co ty Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/rese tion for any subdivision name. Appli 'ons will not be accepted as complete ilia the receives the faxed confirmation of approval n_the jaounty of the Subdivision Name Reervation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 ILDING PERMITS ) PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). -RECYCLING- Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: �? AkC�� c 4; A",%'/ ti 4,ki.�t„ ! a�< gr- CX 5/7i) , -/i/s-c �� �1) L'o /frkc-i-1 °h '5/,, t t {5:� 9- I 13K bR/14." fj•,► 1.�r1 Sp,er►^€/ 17, L-€ f I L / ite' reAf C3-2 710 O��„i,�,� -i.r,y.l�ls,! 4.,th 51 v L 1v4-1 CO (.0171-ec cti,/ I.f•.J Y1t/ '�'� !� 'tiff i (lam Vai ■-. LI,', L., Ay CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Plaguing Basin Section PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follow.all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard //e9r,ve- at/-,Le7 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is aailable from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of ood site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a .prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 7—_-///9 /74,J'wK CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4171 FAX: 503 684-7291 E-MAIL: staf s first name)@ci.tigard.or.us is\cu rpin\masters\revis ed\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATIONCONFERENCE NOTES Ai ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION mumn beve Development Shaping A Better Community IS� �S laa PUBLIC FACILITIES i, , ,,,,o , l-,r:50 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: Sk).■ "EWi7. to 1 feet from centerline.(--C 0 DoT-) ( )__ to _ feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( street improvements sal be necessary along Sv,i -- g.WD O to include: 2-C7 feet of pavement 921DM ['concrete curb 2 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk E3 street trees []'street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page lot 6 Engineering Department Section ,( )_ stre€ iprovements will be necessary alor to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. (4/ Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW -. . Prior to oc.-c_L.PPKky , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section In some cases, where stre nprovements or other necessary *c improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a .;ondition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located c,,.) 1-1 - f -. . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to A LATG2A-t— -cam (- Water Supply: The ---Tjpt./a-ri L 11s7. - Phone:(503) Z4'5" 33) i provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. ° (3%--<--'ce DcTcr�-T IS I-- - .t I U -&r< 5 c - -k DP N1�A4 G Pte•nJ w r l-A^4) use, AP k1..k c iark i Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section ..to pay a fee in-lieu of cons sting an on-site facility provided s .fic criteria are met. The City will . use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. \ PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way f or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section Compliance Agreerr (CAP). This permit covers more `ensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all • grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section • :GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FU '1BDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: �� d , - ; i 62 I I jai ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF Phone: [503)639-4171 Fax: [503)684-7297 h\pattytmasterstpreapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 01-Sept-98 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1" x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): 1=1, --Vicinity Map ELY Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map 9 Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map l- Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan 9 Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ❑ Site Development Plan ❑' Architectural Drawings ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /A' COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation I Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map ,xes dee7( c'lC �i urn Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map , Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 - Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to alrterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of record owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (wi 'n and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a dia - • inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structur and the present use the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platti g ❑ Supplemental information i cluding: • Proposed deed restricts ns (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for prov ion of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features inclu ing rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configuration lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, i shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information annot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with t e application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adj stment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' •r slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements :nd other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within •` of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25°. ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities an• utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 S ,• Development Plan The propose. - and surrounding properties -❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ dscape Pla Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ •ub 'c Improvements/Streets Plan Propose ng -. .' • . '• s and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 grading/Erosion ControTP1 ►. The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 pre-Apps CD Meetin s :.><�::�<��:-:>>:.>::»::>::<::>:::<:::: � .� : >:.::>:::>::«:::: February 1999 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 z; 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > 21 22 23 24 25 26 27:`:'` 28 Tuesday, February 16, 1999 8:00 8:30 9:00 0€ a & DmE r Y Sa v n k v Minor land partition at,12330 SW 11:far. 9:30 • 10:00 10:3011 11.00 Jim Waddle, Hall Park Offices 11481 SW Hall, Phase II 221-2003 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 1:55PM Monday, February 08, 1999 •I 4•,..„,P i N '-' A/ Fifi .`- e-• ' . .. '''.. ../ . .,. .,, .,.' •,,, \. 1 I \ ..',.,....../ '.•,‘,....." _, v 1, ,......... • / ., r-,.... - 24 _ , ..,„ rl• . -16' I 'N e" ■ r- , ., .• rua , 1 IV/ '...... ' ' 12. ir ...' Nocctouous5 s• , I i 1, \ • 112,/ ., . .• . . . , DEC1DLOUS i ...i • 11111 : ....; no I I, , 1 111111 4..... /.......• .1 cf 40. 0 • • w,a, ......../ ... .. ••,/ ...,. . •,... , s.. • . 4100e. .., .....,,.. '' , \\N\ .1 c f A hrd r,,,.4 *.■-• •• ' , ... • , -. . ,..., . ,--, N i 's . , , . ,._: .,i■ WADDLE D E SiCaN/PL ANNINWARCI•1 I TE CTURE a PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 1 101'- 4...\/. . z1-11./4: 'Aii, ' 213/SS t U' , • . Ah...,,,//or • - - - - ® • dillih x V.•• . •• :3:OrFFARCI•eINGTE SPACES ON-SITE N. S1 SPACE S TOTAL At '/ 1 I-1.% \ I 1 ' \{O.'''. / I , I n ' - ie.--- k' 4 I I•1 I nv 7 Am IN 0 IIB 0 C) na El _ _ h:/_ I■ 1 r a , . 4 IBIMIllk Enna I . .... PROPOSED TUJO ST01.21-\‘\\Ns ,--0- .1_,.. lit FOFFLoclmidE rui4iL000DINGsFi . i I : - i I , 2nd FTLOOTOA••R L ••140000•I•O:F I _ •' \X\ \ ,‘_1i Li;V s i1. 1Ina II,1 ! I '•n - - - - _ _ _ _ , _ Of--9 O12 I A B / 6,1411111.1 OM LOAD ING / -1 ILE NNW - - SI .. MIMI - - - - - - - - - - -. - ■Iiiiimmionewila -.I I I I C-- '1.1--.- - --- I --,, -- ---,...... .__.- -rr-7- -2.3 - - I '% \ N UADD_E DESIGN/PLANNING/ARGNITEGTURE nnml�nrr!�?`t ,s. . 1' SITE fi L Aid•v �1 A. F ELIMINAR %��■�� , FD /4'w — 2/3/99 �,il El. 2 .27 N ' • :•4, • .**4 .p O \ 93 PARKING SPACES ON-SITE ���! FD 3/i iP v%. tL. 236.21 + 1 OFF-_U_ N 97 SPACES TOTAL - N\'-1 , • J N i FIR _ 1 I _\ 18" "---- \1 ` 0 Q Q Q iFIR \ , I+ L 40" FIR \ I I. NN Ef1)- IIIIIIII PROP05ED TWO STd,RY N pFFIE BUILDINGI r-1 'I s'io. 's'-a } 2s-o' } 1W-0' 113.-0" } 2r-o' a=o �s'_s r 1st. FLOOR = 14,000 SF# `� a�� / __111111'll 2r1d FLOQR = 14,a0rD �2F O llWWt TOT:L 28,000 spit = 1 l 229.32 < 7 a U y3 O < 1 FY' , , m 11 l ��, 0 1 /�/ I 1/ y ._ .._ — __ l2 1T 12 OMo I IL It o `"— � LOADING — — / J 174-) II j — N • —___ H i_ --__1 __ r— _ I ` 1 City of Tigard Re: Hall Corporate Center H Pre Application Questions to be Answered: VCan the entries to the project be located as shown on the proposed site plan. 2. Do you foresee any problem with the recently improved access / egress at Hall Blvd. acccomodating this new development? 3. Is a zero setback acceptable for parking and building along the Hwy.217 frontage? 4. What is the landscape buffer required at Kinder Care (if any)? Are there any traffic impact fees or other surcharges for the development of the site? How much? 6. What other fees are required and how much are they? 7. Will a submittal to The City Building Department for site plan review and permit be automatically routed to all agencies requiring review and approval of the proposed work, i.e. Fire Marshall, Sewer and Water districts, etc.? 8. Explain the complete process of submittals and approvals, how long each stage is likely to take, and how they relate to one another. 9. We would like to take storm water via a water quality and detention facility through an easement at the Kinder Care property to a manhole south of the site, which our previously submitted downstream analysis indicates is of sufficient capacity. Any comments or reservations?? 10. Please comment on the proposed site plan. (Z 00 sGv 6 S- e4.46f...47 ner- z 0 Sv s - wv-z, •b1J S • I.. - Pl�l t l�L� c�p L-1.t S t 1b?° c s :4 -tatil 6 1-4A- ' rpo Pefgri : S1 3S Pick -t z„lc L?t L�U I co vv i re-Apps (CD ebrua 999 vn, ........... :.;;iii•': v.J}X•GC,�Ii{A+iiM'J}}}}Y/Fi4^X X{.42.XST2W e[ AhAWk-0GhGGGG00.W+ :.:'�n1 Y' ?:i', '^iii/'%�•: ` � L. ^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • :: Tuesday, February. 'I 6, 1999 >:• 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 , hell • 91481 SW Hai, phase D 1. l >:> :::' d '� :aiii:•i:•ir4ii•: 11:30 , :......... :. .. \�•isi%::isii:•'r•ii:•i:•2:Lii:•iiii:::::::::::::.,.:: ::... :.::::...:::.....:.........:.....:..:�:ii::'::::i {.iiix::.i<:{{.iiiiiiii:�ii:•i:•;::.>,>i:42 .: >:....ii::;... 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 9:54AM Thursday,February 04,1999 City of Tigard Re: Hall Corporate Center II Pre Application Questions to be Answered: 1. Can the entries to the project be located as shown on the proposed site plan. 2. Do you foresee any problem with the recently improved access / egress at Hall Blvd. acccomodating this new development? 3. Is a zero setback acceptable for parking and building along the Hwy.217 frontage? 4. What is the landscape buffer required at Kinder Care (if any)? 5. Are there any traffic impact fees or other surcharges for the development of the site? How much? 6. What other fees are required and how much are they? 7. Will a submittal to The City Building Department for site plan review and permit be automatically routed to all agencies requiring review and approval of the proposed work, i.e. Fire Marshall, Sewer and Water districts, etc.? 8. Explain the complete process of submittals and approvals, how long each stage is likely to take, and how they relate to one another. 9. We would like to take storm water via a water quality and detention facility through an easement at the Kinder Care property to a manhole south of the site, which our previously submitted downstream analysis indicates is of sufficient capacity. Any comments or reservations?? 10. Please comment on the proposed site plan. �' f.�. k tom- Cv is Gum ,X- S 221 — wv-7-, �� � PW 47- t<IF cooe-LlS�� r oPc I = �• .1 3S PP= -4 z�c Left, t e)) 1(' ) 1-7 v d , ,• '.. an_ • N IFA'b .s, •■ WADDLE DESIGN/PLANNING/ARCI-IITECT ■ URE 411 et lie• .,'' . ,,,.. 0 NN \ 1 1 s ■■ 01111110111/1110/470„ 44111' ''''' /J.. ‘0. ,4/f,,, N. , Al+ : 19REL11-111\14FRY 5ITE FLAN A., % .4 • dr cFni A2/4.12P7 2/3/99 / 1-• * N : N ro \ NN Nr40,11F41664 ' 3/4-IP ''s 53 PARKING SPACES ON-SITE ti.. T26.21 + 4 OFF-Srl___LE__—_ SPACES TOTAL N , ..--- \\N s• / I ' i --- No ® ® 0 . \ I \\N ----1111-- ( ) (--- -10 PROPO5ED TWO STORY N \ OFF4E BUILDING: 24.-0 15-0.,( 12728-, 1St FLOOR . 14,000 SF± 2ncl FLOCiR . 14,000 Off t illb• a. -4 CP OF CURB G 1111 TOTAL . 28,000:5F± \ ce 111 229.32 I '—. .... ■ '-- N W'' k, 2 .----J 0 T 141 Cir° . • • • :-7,-.1 = 9.° .._ 9.° 0 ' -----. > . -- -- -- -. .----. - M ' e----•-. I _J — ® ® ® 9.° I/ ca er. _c=r2=f7 -1))_____ ..... _ LOADING ---N. / M / _ _ — ■IIIIMEMUMMIIV _J 9 d) 1_ ------ ---.7 - _ 4T----_---_ --. -- _ _)-- — _ , 1 I •I V \ �1 It , 1 • \ % 1 a1T, M i/ a'n Hro I " Nr I a x sl °277.110 / % p \— w J I+\ IiR I ' \I, \ •• / PI• '-36' I \ / I I' rIR I\ 12' ./ ! II I \DECIDUOUSy 8' . 1 II ,� 7 DECIDUOUSS ]2 - ��� N flR ` N. I,/ ��. ` hI` WADDLE DE SIGN/FL ANNIN /ARCHITECTURE R \-. �I I I����' Is .4":" �,. IC — — PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN �-p — _ - �I\z1 1/ `� . .�. / .�, a 27 \ 23/99 . I r/ ]Y /„. 93 PARKING SPACES ON-SITE .411\/ .. \ .4 OFF-SITE �1JR��,�.�t�l�y \ 91 SPACES TOTAL ��y+ �y�� I1z•� . \ I �l it " '111 \w.i \ MI III ' a\ / \ • \ I '1jt� mA ' \ N. •Il IN si PROPOSED ROP08ED TWO STORY • \ OFF \I 1 p� N•0 i ow QE BUILDING: 4, IC-9 ,._,r-p'j 2+'-0' ,i I! #72-T.' 24t FLOOR' • I4/1200 SFz nd yy FLOOR• 14/DOD Eft vow /11.32 I I NI IL 4 1 so 1 MO 00 L _ e- INN i':.,7::4,:: _,.. — — W — — LOADING — — / J Z . I Aug- 13-99 09 = 53A WADD' _ DESIGN 50? '21 1709 P_01 2 Ciidd/c DESIGN / PLANNING / ARCHITECTURE 1700 S.W. Fourth Avenue, Suite 10 Portland, Oregon 97201 TEL: 503/221-2003 FAX: 503/221-1709 M E M O ! F A X C O V E R S H E E T TO: JULIA HAJDUK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER COMPANY: CITY OF TIGARD FAX: 503-684-7297 DATE: 8/13/1999 FROM: JIM WADDLE R E: Hall Corporate Center/Pre-application conference 2/16/99 Number of pages including cover sheet: 1 Message: Julia: Pre-Ap meeting notes for the referenced project are due to expire on 8/16/99, unless some "action" is being taken. Please consider this as written notice that action is continuing with the intent of submitting a SDR in the near future. Our traffic study is due to be completed next week, and the preliminary drawings are complete for the neighborhood meeting. Engineering drawings will take about two weeks. Please contact me immediately if this is insufficient to maintain the pre-ap meeting notes as valid. Sine rely, 1 de6 Ja eis H. Waddle, Architect COOy'IES: Kris Londahi, Mike Nedelisky OPERATOR: If this transmission does not come through properly or there are missing pages, please notify us immediately for re-transmission. If this fax was received in error, please notify us immediately. Thank you. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS STATE OF OREGON e-cau 12 cot-° -•oof Washington r SS Fidelity National Title I, Jerry; of Assess- 1117 Company of Oregon ment and`,«,r e_-' L, o County 401 S.W.FOURTH AVENUE Clerk for - •. 5 Li�kv�e� . a : rti that 1717 the wit '/• C r T' i,-� c PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-2279 `��. eceived and r-s e u=* ^q; R a '' u % 6•11 a S) if said (503)223-8338 (503)227-8425 FAX county . � * . r r {[ f D . f 99q-o00,2-3 ; . s,_ r * vs * ,,fi"y �- �� -rr -Ha m+ iirector of I J1 = c _taxation, Ex- f� CO nc�)�,t�n ler Doc : 2000018254 I ' Rect: 250296 32. 00 03/08/2000 10: 39: 15am DECLARATION OF EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned LN PROPERTIES, LLC, as a successor-in-interest of the Grantee named in that certain instrument entitled "Declaration of Easement" heretofore recorded in the Official Records of Washington County, Oregon, on September 15, 1997, as Document No. 97085692, (the "1997 Declaration") which instrument is by this reference incorporated herein with like effect as though the same, together with all the terms, provisions and exhibits contained and incorporated therein, was set forth verbatim in, and made a part of, the text of this instrument, and as record owner of the premises and real property described as: The North seventy five (75.00) feet of Lot 23, Block 0, METZGER ACRES TRACTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon which adjoins and lies contiguous with a portion f the "gervient Premises" desc'rib d in the said 1997 Declaration, does hereby, for itself, and f itssuccessors-in-interest and is igns, and in perpetuity, reserve, and declare subject to, all e events, covenants, conditions ancl restrictions set forth and contained in the 1997 Declaration 'th like effect as though the below-described land was a part of the said Servient Premises described in, and subject of, the said 1997 Declaration, that portion of the above-described premises comprising a parcel of land bounded —��.E and described as follows, to wit: li N T tO Beginning at the Southwest corner of the North 75 feet of said Lot 23, Block 0, METZGER ACRES TRACTS, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; z thence North 2°03'00" East, 3.83 feet along i • . • •1 • • , point; thence South 89°51'54" East, 272.50 feet mire or 1440_to,a.pidint on tl -,; • •t right- of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard (Conn 4 Road.No. 947); thence b •asterly c ' W ti E� along the West right-of-way line of S.W. H $`oulevard 7.75 feet, more'orAl ss, to a point on the South line of the North 75 feet if said Lot 23; thence North : '03'05" West, 272.47 feet, more or less, along the South line of the North 75 feet of said Lot = 23 to the Southwest corner thereof and the place of beginning above-stated. Provided, however, this instrument shall not evidence or constitute conveyance of fee title to the above-described parcel of land or any portion thereof. 1� Declaration of Easement [Continued on Reverse] Page 1 of 2 After Recording Return To: THIS FORM IS INCLUDED FOR LEGIBILITY Thomas A.Sherwood,Esq. 12402 SW Chandler Drive Tigard,OR 97224-2827 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: No Change DECLARATION OF EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned LN PROPERTIES, LLC, as a successor-in-interest of the Grantee named in that certain instrument entitled "Declaration of Easement" heretofore recorded in the Official Records of Washington County, Oregon, on September 15, 1997, as Document No. 97085692, (the "1997 Declaration") which instrument is by this reference incorporated herein with like effect as though the same, together with all the terms, provisions and exhibits contained and incorporated therein, was set forth verbatim in, and made a part of, the text of this instrument, and as record owner of the premises and real property described as: The North seventy five (75.00) feet of Lot 23, Block 0, METZGER ACRES TRACTS, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon which adjoins and lies contiguous with a portion of the "Servient Premises" described in the said 1997 Declaration, does hereby, for itself, and for its successors-in-interest and assigns, and in perpetuity, reserve, and declare subject to, all easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth and contained in the 1997 Declaration with like effect as though the below-described land was a part of the said Servient Premises described in, and subject of, the said 1997 Declaration, that portion of the above-described premises comprising a parcel of land bounded and described as follows,to wit: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the North 75 feet of said Lot 23, Block 0, METZGER ACRES TRACTS, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; thence North 2°03'00" East, 3.83 feet along the West line of said Lot 23 to a point; thence South 89°51'54" East, 272.50 feet more or less to a point on the West right- of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947); thence Southeasterly along the West right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard 7.75 feet, more or less, to a point on the South line of the North 75 feet of said Lot 23; thence North 89°03'05" West, 272.47 feet, more or less, along the South line of the North 75 feet of said Lot 23 to the Southwest corner thereof and the place of beginning above-stated. Provided, however, this instrument shall not evidence or constitute conveyance of fee title to the above-described parcel of land or any portion thereof. Declaration of Easement [Continued on Reverse] Page 1 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument on /*9ar ,:. 2000. LN PROPERTIES, LLC. I h ` By =� �� By Af A w .�_ Kris Landahl, Manager/Member ''hael J. Ne ie sky, M. ager/Menber State of Oregon, County of f ",v; "p/ }s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before me on the play of /e°4,0,..-....e 2000, by Kris Landahl as a Manager/Member of LN Properties, LLC. i.'�. OFFICIAL.SEAL ED ALDERS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Public for Oregon _M6.IISS:ON NO.321773 My Commission Expires: 3--PC--2-0r23 MY COMMISSI'?N E1."IRV'i i.1 ARCH 18,2003 State of Oregon, County o n Xel,-/o7✓ }s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before.me on the day of 2000, by Michael J. Nedelisky as a Manager/Member of LN Properties, LLC. OFFICIAL SEAL K ED ALDERS :1;" NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON Notary Public for Oregon �;. COMMISSION NO.321773 My Commission Expires: 3- Ig--?-t2C- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 18,2003 Easement Page 2 of 2 ] _ Fidelity N,..iona1 Title STi, JF OREGON l i Company of Oregon County of Washington r SS ITT 401 S.W.FOURTH AVENUE I, Jerry; u*�.•____,u : . of Assess- PORTLAND,OREGON 97204-2279 ment and/,M. x;54 ,�. �K, .o County (503)223-8338 (503)227-8425 FAX Clerk ford.,.it;{`.ae ale �.E ::rtify that the wit i a f- - ��r , n'.• \ \eceived and rea=(• . r.+•. a s a •f said t S - county 0 x _ � !! x L * . x 0 ) 4 4 *• `. G ire ctor of 4.: -$ • axation, Ex- .- :•-P.' • Ierk Doc : 2000018255 Rect: 250296 32.00 EASEMENT 03/08/2000 10: 39: 16am IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration to the undersigned Grantor in hand paid and delivered, the undersigned LN PROPERTIES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantor and record owner of the premises and real property hereinafter described, does hereby grant and convey to MARY JEAN BRAZIL, Grantee, her successors-in-interest and assigns, a non-exclusive easement, for use for the sole purpose hereinafter stated, over and upon the surface of the following described premises: z.. A parcel of land located in the Northeast one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of •"=`� Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Li T R - c- 4— Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: J- 7 O I r i x Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 23,Block 0,METZGER ACRES TRACTS in Q o.v the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, thence North 89°03'05" East, along the U° North line of said Lot 23, a distance of 18.50 feet to the true point of beginning of said aL ep en w = n:' easement parcel; thence continuing North 89°03'05" East along the North line of said Lot � Ea z 23,24.00 feet to a point; thence South 02°03'00" West on a line parallel with the West line H m c, of said Lot 23, 70.50 feet to a point; thence South 89°51'54" West, 24.00 feet to a point; .y m §- thence North 02°03'00"East on a line parallel with the West line of said Lot 23, 70.86 feet, o more or less,to the true point of beginning. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD in perpetuity from and after, but not before, the time, if any, when: (a) the Grantee,or her successor(s)-in-interest or assign shall have pa pled for an o to 11 licenses and permits required by applicable law to allow constru iopcpjAtie or more buildings sou r commercial or business uses only with an attendant requirement orcvehicular parking on the Grant a real property lying generally north of said Lot 23, Block 0, MET GEI2.ACRES TRACTS, and(b)the rantee, or her said successor(s)-in-interest or assigns, shall lawfully acquire from the fee owner thereo an enforceable, duly recorded and perpetual non-exclusive easement over the full breadth and length of that portion of the tract of land described at "Exhibit A" to that certain "Declaration of Easement" recorded September 15, 1997, as Document 97085692, Records of Washington County, Oregon, that lies between a line extending the westerly line of the above-described parcel South 02°03'00" West to the southerly boundary of said tract and the West line of S.W. Hall Boulevard(County Road No. 947), all and together for the sole and exclusive purpose of surface vehicular access and egress over and through the above- • described parcel and said portion of the tract of land described at said "Exhibit A" from and between Grantee's said real property lying generally to th ort 2SBi Lot 23, and st id S.W. Hall Boulevard, and for no other or additional purpose, pu>po gff whatsoever. r;t _ ' tKrS,' .... .. . Easement [Continued on Reverse] Page 1 of 2 .1 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: THIS FORM IS INCLUDED FOR LEGIBILITY Thomas A.Sherwood,Esq. 12402 SW Chandler Drive Tigard,OR 97224-2827 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: No Change EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration to the undersigned Grantor in hand paid and delivered, the undersigned LN PROPERTIES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantor and record owner of the premises and real property hereinafter described, does hereby grant and convey to MARY JEAN BRAZIL, Grantee, her successors-in-interest and assigns, a non-exclusive easement, for use for the sole purpose hereinafter stated, over and upon the surface of the following described premises: A parcel of land located in the Northeast one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 23,Block 0,METZGER ACRES TRACTS in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, thence North 89°03'05" East, along the North line of said Lot 23, a distance of 18.50 feet to the true point of beginning of said easement parcel; thence continuing North 89°03'05" East along the North line of said Lot 23,24.00 feet to a point; thence South 02°03'00" West on a line parallel with the West line of said Lot 23, 70.50 feet to a point; thence South 89°51'54" West, 24.00 feet to a point; thence North 02°03'00"East on a line parallel with the West line of said Lot 23, 70.86 feet, more or less,to the true point of beginning. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD in perpetuity from and after, but not before, the time, if any, when: (a) the Grantee,or her successor(s)-in-interest or assigns, shall have applied for and obtained all licenses and permits required by applicable law to allow construction of one or more buildings suited for commercial or business uses only with an attendant requirement for vehicular parking on the Grantee's real property lying generally north of said Lot 23, Block 0, METZGER ACRES TRACTS, and (b) the Grantee, or her said successor(s)-in-interest or assigns, shall lawfully acquire from the fee owner thereof an enforceable, duly recorded and perpetual non-exclusive easement over the full breadth and length of that portion of the tract of land described at "Exhibit A" to that certain "Declaration of Easement" recorded September 15, 1997, as Document 97085692, Records of Washington County, Oregon, that lies between a line extending the westerly line of the above-described parcel South 02°03'00" West to the southerly boundary of said tract and the West line of S.W. Hall Boulevard(County Road No. 947), all and together for the sole and exclusive purpose of surface vehicular access and egress over and through the above- described parcel and said portion of the tract of land described at said "Exhibit A" from and between Grantee's said real property lying generally to the North of said Lot 23, and the said S.W. Hall Boulevard,and for no other or additional purpose, purposes or uses whatsoever. Easement [Continued on Reverse] Page 1 of 2 i `k PROVIDED,HOWEVER, if and to the extent, if any,any physical structures or improvements(e.g. pavement, curbing, fencing, walls or similar barriers), or any landscaping elements (e.g. trees, shrubs, ground cover, bushes or foliage), must be removed or relocated or replaced or installed in order to allow unobstructed vehicular access or egress to or from the Grantee's said real property over and through the northerly portion of the above-described parcel, then the Grantee, or her said successors-in-interest or assigns, shall be and remain solely responsible to accomplish such removals, relocation, replacements and/or installations all at no cost to Grantor and its successors-in-interest and assigns, and, in any event, to save harmless and indemnify the Grantor, its successors-in-interest and assigns from and for all and any claims, losses, damages or injuries to persons or property of any description whatsoever suffered or incurred by Grantor and all others who may now, or at anytime hereafter, lawfully use or be present upon the above-described parcel and/or any portion of Grantor's adjoining premises, caused by, or resulting from, any such removal, relocation, replacement, installation, or otherwise by reason of the use of said parcel, or any part thereof, for the benefit of the Grantee's said real property, and PROVIDED FURTHER, the foregoing-described easement is granted hereunder without waiver, qualification, limitation or prejudice of any kind, nature or description whatsoever, now or hereafter recognized or implied at law or in equity, of or to Grantor's present or future rights, powers and prerogatives with respect to the easements and lands subject of said Declaration of Easement recorded September 15, 1997 as aforesaid, howsoever acquired, and, except as to the rights herein granted, the Grantor shall have full use,enjoyment and control of the above-described parcel. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument on / oc. 20'21 , 2000. n r .— \ LN PROPERTIES,LLC 1 ' 1 1 "�' By L`.. �. .I► Bye Kris Landahl, Manager/Member hael J. edelisky,M; ,:ger/Member State of Oregon,County of /,15; / "/"As.s. fl /� This instrument was acknowledged before me on the � �= day of (y , 2000, by Kris Landahl as a Manager/Member of LN Properties, LLC. OFFICIAL SEAL .. ~.. ED ALBERS ='�f:-A NOTARY Flint IC—OREGON � ;. COMMISes No.321773 Notary Public for Oregon MY COMMISSION F..,.✓•' . 'ARCH 88 2003 My Commission Expires: 3--I 17- 2-co 3 State of Oregon,County of/4/ ,14-1 ✓� }s.s. // �z� This instrument was acknowledged before me on the .?"�day of ,2000,by Michael J.Nedelisky as a Manager/Member of LN Properties,LLC. .11-. OFFICIAL SEAL ED ALBERS Notary Public or regon '`r``= NOTARY PUBLIC—OREGON ' '�; c *n' N NO.3287 $ My Commission Expires: 3'`Al' 2-003 -woo ...,ARCH 18,2003 Easement [WARNING!Notary Seals May Not Obliterate Any Text of Acknowledgments] Page 2 of 2 _r Revised 5 112198 Hall Park Office Center 11481 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon Job#748 OWNER: L.N. Properties LLC Mike Nedelisky CIO GlasPac Total Solutions Kris Londahl 73‘.,553c. 12725 S.W. 66th 658-2767 Portland, OR 97223 Fax 658-5416 £D 4Ibars 6,84- Sofro ra'r0�33 a1<>r 2Ao CONTRACTOR: Baugh Construction Oregon, Inc. Greg Handy P.O. Box 767 Paul Yannello Beaverton, OR 97076 526-3120 643-0646 FAX JOBSITE: Baugh Construction Oregon, Inc. Jack Schulfer 11481 S.W. Hall Blvd_ Jobsite: 670-7336 'Tigard, Oregon Fax 670-9617 ARCHITECT: Waddle Design Jim Waddle 1700 S_W 4th Ave Ste. 105 221-2003 Portland, Oregon 97201 Fax 221-1709 CMLJSTRUCT: VLMK Consulting Engineers Jim Knauf 3933 S.W. Kelly Ave. 222-4453 Portland, Oregon 97201 Fax 248-9263 SOILS GeoStandards :Sam Adettiwar ENGINEER: 1225 N.W. Murray Blvd_Suite 210 646-9069 Portland, Oregon 97229::.:: Fax 646-8976 Dost-it"Fay Note 7671 Pate 2 / /Y) 1:"°a=► /1 To Frvm r /�'����•7 Phone x Phone a ,5- 3./20 Fax M /_ 4- 04 Fax v •/ Revised 5/12/98 Hall Park Office Center 11481 S.W. Halt Blvd. Tigard, Oregon Job #748 b04121 b04121 9 J $O !work, utilities LZN EXCAVATION Kirk Wardius & Paving PO Box 1990 557-7933 Clackamas, Oregon 97015 557-5748 FAX 01/01.74 Extruded Curbs SCHNEIDER PERMA CURB Gene Schneider & Striping P O. Box 14623 282-3254 Portland, Oregon 97293 646-8775 FAX 01101.90 Landscaping NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE IND. Jim Kissler & Irrigation 16075 S.W. Upper Boones 684-1450 Ferry Road 620-7592 FAX Tigard, Oregon 97224 01101.81 Chain Link Fence FENCE FABRICATOR Tony Messina 2040 S.W. Wynwood 646-6230 Port, Oregon 97225 644-5278 FAX 02/04.01 Concrete Supply ROSS ISLAND Karl Cook P.O. Box 82249 239-5504 Port, Oregon 97282 235-1350 FAX 02/04.86 Rebar Supply PRECISION REBAR Bob Ruby 1712 N.E. 990 St. 1-800-815-2312 Vancouver, WA 98665 503-224-7414 FAX 01 /04.87 Rebar Install C &J REBAR Mark Sorensen 20572 So. Upper Highland Rd. 632-3740 Beavercreek, Oregon 97004 632-3768 FAX 01/05.00 Furnish Steel FULL TILT WELDING Steve Jennings &Tilt Welding 14001 S.E. Maley Ln 659-7595 Milwaukie, Oregon 654-1980 FAX vu35.1 5 rui ntsn ruvvERs WEST I Om Powers Joists & Deck 1200 Westlake Ave North 244-4612 Ste. 603 206-284-9576 FAX Seattle, WA 96109 01/05.01 Steel Erection VOLK STEEL ERECTORS Stan Volk 4126 S.E. 12' 661-6170 Gresham, Oregon 97080 661-9083 FAX 01/06.80 Casework 01107.76 Sealants PIONEER WATERPROOFING Dick Graves 4200 S.E. Belmont St. 232-9020 Port, Oregon 97215 234-4760 FAX Revised 5 /12/98 Hall Park Office Center 11481 S.W. Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon Job #748 01/07.45 Sheetmetal . SKYLINE SHEET METAL Anthony Opoka 1535 N.W. Sundial Rd. 669-1156 Troutdaie, Oregon 9706C 656-61d9 FAX 01/07.31 Roofing PACIFIC ROOFING COMPANY Craig Schwindt P.O. Box 1728 640-3163 Beaverton, Oregon 97075 648-7303 FAX 1/08.40 Windows MOUNTAIN GLASS Tim Sullivan 26045 S Warnock Rd. 630-4305 Estacada, Oregon 97023 630-4304 FAX 02/08.51 Furnish Doors BENSON INDUSTRIES Mark Beasley 1415 N.W. 12th St. 226-7621 Port, Oregon 97209 274-0492 FAX 01/09.20 Drywall HARLENS DRYWALL Tim Hiller 1205 N.E. 95th St. 503-228-1883 Vancouver, WA 98665 360-574-1458 FAX 01/09.45 Floor covering DON FRANK John Duty 1907 S.E. Grand Ave. 235-5447 Port. Oregon 97214 235-5448 FAX 01/09.99 Painting GARY MCLOUD PAINTING Gary McLoud 20531 S. Molfala Ave. 656-0590 Oregon City, Oregon 97045 650-8114 FAX 01/10.02 Toilet Partitions W.H. CRESS COMPANY Phil.Mannan & Accessories 9966 S.W. Katherine St. 620-1664 Tigard, Oregon 97223 620-5834 FAX 01/14.02 Elevator SCHINDLER ELEV. CORPORATION Rich McCarthy LI Id SYV. lcapAci I ■At ' ✓ �Vt.. .' _'.21 .7J Port, Oregon 97217 286-9489 FAX 01/15.50 Fire Protection DELTA FIRE SYSTEMS Steve Cartales 14795 S.W. 72nd. Ave 620-4020 Port, Oregon 97224 620-1058 FAX 01/15.20 Plumbing BEAVERTON PLUMBING Mark Hryoiw 13980 S.W. Tualatin Valley Hwy. 643-7619 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 643-7620 FAX 01/15.30 HVAC D.L. HOWARD COMPANY Dan Howard 5340 S.W. Dover Lane 246-6764 Port, Oregon 97225 293-0229 FAX Revised 5/12/98 Hall Park Office Center 11481 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon Job #748 01/16.00 Electrical FRAHLER ELECTRIC George Rondema 11860 S.W. Greenburg Rd. 639-4627 Tigard, OR 97223 639-4673 FAX • 4.1[,. ' 4 4. • !4,•f•. cf '2T 4. ; !ate 1 lv4 4`-' , ,• • %,.. >• °'t.y mod.! i. ,•. LLLL • 'w !r •- •.'..— :r 'y..va . ., ._'i+4 '‘•' � a . _j: 7'* �1• 'k�i.1 • - . Y•` ' as • VIM Of OfttOON I County of 941ohl p ' i •a k .County the • end ocefc evtlev "- of county * .,,, ., * . j.�• :: ' R. •v 1 : • , . ' Clerk • • Doc t 94033952 Poets 120116 58.00 04/00/1994 1Ot18t00RM ' • • :{', .r • ' • .• .1,4 •• l.i• "•* _••..t.. 14.•../� • i .. ••• . • :rr• 1• 1 • .. . —. .. ;•• —:3 V i.'J• Fry `t•3+r,' i•••:•• ./ .• � , ■�. ( 1)4,z . GC; J — &"C'IL2`�W.,3-yam_ A44.4•44.) rl Q 1 g(ci'4' c- ( -..)J •. • '‘Ft-,1 • • ASISI31231? rOa SRAM Oa:ITE RASM S ? AND ICAMIT S3 PCs • MIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 30 day of March, hereinafter called Grantor., a and Carl Eshelman, hereinafter called s Grantee. lied p t NITHESSETRt :t t WHEREAS, Grantors are the owner in fee simple of the real property in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of s h goon, and on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part f d WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner in fee simple of the real property in the said city, county and state described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and • WHEREAS, and said two parcels of real estate adjoin each other; and EAS, Grantors desire to grant to Grantee an access easement for a shared driveway to be construed along and upon a portion of Grantors, parcel. . NOW, EREFRE in Grantee an easement hereinafter ddescribed,f and Grantors antin to Grantee tendering to Grantor $3,300.00 in cash, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged; FIRST: Grantors convey to second party an easement for access, ingress and egress for use in conjunction with any lawful use of Grantee's property upon that portion of Grantor's property described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECOND: Grantee has the obligation for maintenance and repair of the shared drive so long as the lands to the west which are benefited by the shared drive contain no more than two single- ' , family residences. In the event the lands to the west are developed to increase the vehicular burden on the shared drive, then from such time forward the cost of maintaining that portion of the shared drive constructed to the west of that point 120 feet to the west of B.W. Hall Boulevard shall be shared prorate to the amount of square footage i each parcel which has access to B.W. Hall Boulevard through said shared drive, including the parcel described on Exhibit "B" hereof. After Recording Send ^o: David Hughes 1156$ SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Q. . ., t» ..I, .. . . • :w •,• r• . - . • -. +;• .,rte•.+,1 •t' .1T �/'• ice. , ti, Page s • ' : Shared Drive Easement lee • THIRD: The Grantee is prohibited frog granting, assigning, or es permitting, to any other parcel owners in the subdivision known as METZGER ACRE TRACTS, access to the said easement. FOURTH: This Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be deemed to run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Grantee, Grantors and their respective heirs, • successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed the day and year first written above. . ' "IL'It t :1.1.1 -4F c-1'4JS -JQ----- David Hughes • rl Eshelman Woodrow��o William Blue ett,� • STATE OF OREGON ) STATE OF OREGON ) ' '-` . . ) sm. )ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) County of Washington ) This instrument was ack- This instrument was ack- novledged before me on ?• J o , nowledged before me on 7-70 1994. e-?,,...,..„.__-2....„......„ 761/4............ ----o...<.....),_ ,_____ Notary Public for Oregon Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires 2.1,91 My commission expires 0 ix f d' • .....!.....7 OPN IAL swl :.^' ►�Q11 M1 PAISIMON woo ON wai:+aiiw M'oasrMOSas.wwitK+ms as-.. .n•'•. •• .. , . •♦ _ • s. DsSCRIPTIOX Exhibit AN PARCEL Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 23, Block "0", METZGER ACRE TRACTS, as shown by the duly recorded plot thereof, in the County of Washington, State of Oregon; thence Westerly along the south line of said lot, 300 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said lot; thence Easterly and parallel with the south of said Lot 23, 75 feet, more or less; thence South and along the west • line of said Lot 23, 75 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning. ' PARCEL II The North half of Lot 26, Block "O", METZGER ACRE TRACT, in the - County of Washington and State of Oregon and also the following described parcel: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 26, Block "O", METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; thence Northerly along the west line of Lot 26, a distance of 52.63 feet the true point of beginning of the hereinafter described tract; thence continuing along the west line of said Lot 26, a distance of 8.3 feet to a point; thence East 301.9 feet to the east line of said Lot 26; thence South along the east line of said Lot 26, a distance of 4 feet to a point; thence North 89 degrees, 11 feet, East at 302.1 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. PARCEL III • Part of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, and described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe which is North 2 degrees, 3 feet, East 499.27 feet from the southwest corner of the Stott Donation Land "° d Clem; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning North 88 degrees, West 209.78 feet to an iron pipe on the easterly line of proposed roadway; hence continuing North 88 degrees West 25.0 � 1 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 2 degrees, 55 feet, East 186.8 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 88 degrees East 25.0 feet to an iron pipe on the easterly line of the aforesaid road area; thencw continuing South 88 degrees East 206.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 2 degrees, 3 feet West 186.8 feet to the point of beginning. . LA • .. • • • • • ) Page 2 . 4 Exhibit °A" •,,,; • . • PARCEL IT The South one half of the following described tract, in Notion 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington • s. County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe which is North 2 degrios 3 feet East 686.07 feet from the southwest corner of the Thomas A. Stott Donation Land Claim; thence from said iron pipe and true point of beginning; North 88 degrees, West 206.88 feet to an iron pipe on the easterly line of a proposed roadway; thence continuing North 88 . • degrees West 25.0 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 2 degrees 55 • feet, East 189.25 feet to an iron pip.; thence South 88 degrees • East 25.0 feet to an iron pipe on the easterly line of aforesaid road area; thence continuing South 88 degrees East 203.96 feet to an iron pipe: thence South 2 degrees, 3 feet West 189.25 feet to • the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "B" HEREIN. • P. • 1 • l• . . • t•• to. 5 . .. • • ',ell" • . ' • • • • , • • ' 67! .04.16!• ••• • ''..;. • • . . • • . •• ,; I • : - .• z • ••• r •• • .• • •-; .;• . . . . • .• • . •• ' -.!'h • :4. • • • • • . • • • • . • . . . • ..• •'''` • - . - • Desoriptioa -m• Bichibit sir* „q.....- . :''.- •l''''. - II a is. 4‘.••:! -.1,.., II Th• North 75 nimt of Lot 23, in Block 0, KETSGER A CT r i. shown by the duly recorded kap of plat thereof on filo and of record Oregon. the office of the County clerk of Washington County*, I • •-.1 .. .0.11. , - .. 4.; ..0„ ( i ... . ... . .. • I. • -. t , ife . !t I f • I • • 1 .... •- i . . ? . 4 0• • 1 1•4' . .• • . .... •... • .0 • . ....: .! ' P." • : ....' '• ' . • • • • '‘N% • -- • • : • . a• .. •• ' • • ' . i ; • . i ;. .... .:;'‘ 1•■:::... .." , •. *• ... - * f • . ..• • • '. • • ... DESCRIPTIOJ ' Exhibit "C" A parcel of land located in the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found 2" iron pipe at the southeast corner of the David C. Graham Donation Land Claim Number 52, said point also being the initial point of GRAHAM ACRES, thence tracing the West line of the Thomas Stott Donation Land Claim Number 53, South of degrees 46 feet 47 inches West 829.76 feet to a point on the south line of Lot 23, METZGER ACRE TRACTS; thence tracing said south line, East 282.60 feet to a found 1/2" iron pipe, 30 feet, more or less, West of the centerline of S.W. Hall Boulevard (County Road No. 947) ; thence North a distance of 42.93 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of thi3 description; thence continuing North a distance of 32.07 feet; thence West 120.00 feet; thence South 33.77 feet; thence North 89 degrees 11 feet 11 inches East 120.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. ' Containing 3950 square feet, more or less. Bearings of this description are based on County Survey No. 21,801 filed in the office of the Washington County Surveyor. bo • • • . ,.. , E OF OREGON , AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ,ty of Washington SS --%/) Thomas A.Sherwood,Esq. �4Ret.;� O( 16325 S.W.Boone:Ferry Road,Suite 203 I, Jerry ufansogRiptrdt r of Assess- Lake Oswego,OR 97035 ment and atiOn qnd EX-0 io County Clerk for is Zouptjr,td&j@reby rtify that the with! ictbtrufrteDj 1414,04 VI 'received and re rde Oitfst?of said county. * N ';� ...� :�.; * fh,•'4., •17;'..._• Efif r '-R:Ha,nsdn Director of 'Si s>Alkiilta clTaxatlon, Ex- ftttiQf,rqun1 Clerk Doc : 97085692 Rect: 194148 78 . 00 09/15/1997 03 : 15: 51pm DECLARATION OF EASEMENT RECITALS WHEREAS, the undersigned Brahmapremananda Ashrama, which took title as Brahma Premananda Ashram, an Oregon non-profit corporation, herein called "Grantor", is the owner in fee simple of a certain tract of land situated in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit A annexed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth, herein called "Servient Premises", and WHEREAS, the undersigned Michael J. Nedelisky, herein called "Grantee", is the owner in fee simple of that certain tract of land situated in Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described at Exhibit B annexed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully set forth, herein called "Grantee's Premises", and WHEREAS, by instrument recorded as Fee No. 88-9619, in the records of Washington County, Oregon, on March 9, 1988, Woodrow W. Hughes, David W. Hughes and William Blue, as the "Grantors" therein named, entered into an Agreement For Shared Drive Easement And Maintenance, with Kinder-Care, Inc., a corporation, therein named as "Grantee" (herein called "Kinder-Care Agreement"), affording to the said Kinder-Care, Inc., certain rights of access affecting a portion of the Servient Premises subject to certain affirmative undertakings on the part of said Kinder-Care, Inc., to maintain and repair, and bear the cost of maintenance and repair, of that portion of the Servient Premises affected by said agreement all as therein provided for, and WHEREAS, by instrument recorded as Fee No. 94033952, in the records of Washington County, Oregon, on April 8, 1994, the said Woodrow W. Hughes, David W. Hughes and William Blue, as the "Grantors" therein named, entered into an Agreement For Shared Drive Easement And Maintenance, with Carl Eshelman, therein named as "Grantee" (herein called "Eshelman Agreement"), affording to the said Carl Eshelman certain rights of access affecting a portion of the Servient Premises subject to certain affirmative undertakings on the part of said Carl Eshelman, to maintain and repair, and bear the cost of maintenance and repair, of that portion of the Servient Premises affected by said agreement all as therein provided for, and WHEREAS, by their terms, both the Kinder-Care Agreement and the Eshelman Agreement provide: This Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be deemed to run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Grantee, Grantors and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. DECLARATION OF EASEMENT / /0 Page 1 of 8 Pages and WHEREAS, the Grantor and the Grantee named herein each desire and intend that they and each of them and their respective successors in interest, transferees, assigns, lessees, tenants and invitees shall now and for all time hereafter have the unqualified right and ability to use, enjoy, occupy, improve, re-improve, construct improvements, reconstruct improvements, develop and redevelop, sell, lease, rent and otherwise deal with all premises, parcels and tracts of land which the Grantor and the Grantee, or either of their number, or their respective successors in interest, transferees, assigns, lessees, tenants and invitees, shall now or hereafter own or acquire the right to use or occupy which may at anytime benefit from the rights of use and easements created hereunder whether or not such premises, parcels and tracts of land are now owned, occupied or used by Grantor or Grantee, all to the highest and best use which may be made of said premises, parcels or tracts of land, and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this instrument to establish and create in favor of the Grantee, perpetual non- exclusive rights and interests in the Servient Premises in every way sufficient to accomplish the desires and intent of the Grantor and Grantee above-stated and to hereby define, fix and establish in perpetuity, for the benefit of each of their number, their said successors in interest, transferees, assigns, lessees, tenants and invitees respectively, the uses and purposes for which the Servient Premises shall be committed, employed, improved and maintained without in any manner effecting conveyance of the fee title to the Servient Premises or any portion thereof, AGREEMENT In consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual declarations and agreements herein contained and set forth, it is hereby COVENANTED AND AGREED by and between the Grantor and the Grantee, each with the other, as follows: 1. Easement for Surface Access and Egress. The Servient Premises shall be, and are hereby, declared and subjected to a common, non-exclusive easement and right of way for surface vehicular and pedestrian access to and egress from the whole of all adjoining tracts of land now owned, or which are hereafter acquired, by the Grantor or by the Grantee, including, but not limited to, the Grantee's Premises above described, and which lie within, or, as the case may be, which lie contiguous with, any portion of the Servient Premises, the Grantee's Premises or both of said premises, whether or not any such adjoining tracts of land so owned shall, now or hereafter, be described in gross or as separate parcels or tracts; whether or not any or all of said adjoining tracts of land shall be improved or developed to any extent whatsoever, and at such time or times as the same shall be improved, developed and used, to whatever extent any or all of said adjoining tracts shall be lawfully improved, developed and used at any time in the future. The easements and rights of way established and created hereby shall run with the lands subjected thereto, and the lands benefited thereby, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Grantor and the Grantee and their respective heirs, successors in interest and assigns. 2. Easement for Utilities and Services. Subject to requirements, regulations, restrictions now, or at any time hereafter, lawfully imposed by duly constituted governmental authorities, the Servient Premises shall be, and are hereby, declared and subjected to a common, non-exclusive easement and right of way for the underground, surface and above-ground installation, construction, reconstruction, placement, use and maintenance of utilities services and their associated conduits, equipment, components, pipes, conductors, controls, metering and DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 2 of 8 Pages monitoring devices, connections, inlets, outlets, vaults, means of access and means of support whether below, on, or above the surface of the land, including, but not limited to, water service of any description; sanitary sewer collection, storage, processing, pumping and/or disposal; storm sewers, rain drains, catchment, control and/or drainage of surface and above ground runoff from lands and improvements; electric services and electricity; telecommunications of every description, fire mains and hydrants; natural gas transmission, and generally all other additional or other equipment or installations which may, from time to time, become necessary or convenient for purposes of rendering necessary utilities and services available to, and adequate for development and use of, the whole of all adjoining tracts of land now owned, or which are hereafter acquired, by the Grantor or by the Grantee, including but not limited to the Grantee's Premises above described, which lie within, or, as the case may be, which lie contiguous with any portion of the Servient Premises, the Grantee's Premises or both of said premises, whether or not any such adjoining tracts of land so owned shall be, now or hereafter, described in gross or as separate parcels or tracts; whether or not any or all of said adjoining tracts of land shall be improved or developed to any extent whatsoever, and, at such time or times as the same shall be improved, developed and used, to whatever extent any or all of said adjoining tracts shall be lawfully improved, developed and used at any time in the future. 3. Easement for Monuments, Signs and Billboards. Subject to requirements, regulations, restrictions now, or at any time hereafter, imposed by duly constituted governmental authorities, the Servient Premises described shall be, and are hereby, declared and subjected to a common, non-exclusive easement for construction, reconstruction, installation, use and maintenance of permanent monuments, signs or billboards placed solely for the purpose of identifying by name(s), address(es), activity(ies), business(es), commercial or other uses, any party or parties who may occupy any portion of any improvements placed on any land benefited by the easements established at paragraphs 1 or 2 above. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, no such monument, sign or billboard shall be placed or erected upon, or extend over or above, any improved roadway, driveways or pedestrian walkways now, or at any time hereafter, placed anywhere within, or which intersects or abuts, the boundaries of the Servient Premises; nor shall any such monument, sign or billboard he configured in such a way, or erected or placed in such location or manner, as may in any way materially interfere with, or obstruct, either: (a) free and convenient access to any improvements located upon any tract or tracts of land benefited by the easements established by paragraphs 1 or 2 above by means of any improvements made upon or to the Servient Premises or by any other means; or (b) construction, reconstruction, installation, use or maintenance of any improved roadway, driveways, pedestrian walkways, landscaping or other improvements or installations located upon, above or beneath the surface of land lying within the boundaries of the Servient Premises other than monuments, signs or billboards placed thereon; or (c) the ability of persons intending to enter onto or to depart from the Servient Premises from the public roadway which lies contiguous with the easternmost boundary thereof, to readily perceive and identify the entrance to the Servient Premises from said roadway and safely enter into, or depart from, said entrance on or by means of said public roadway. 4. Easements Appurtenant. The rights and easements described and created hereunder shall endure in perpetuity and shall be and remain appurtenant to the Grantee's Premises above-described and to any additional or other premises, parcels or tracts of land hereafter acquired by the Grantor or the Grantee as aforesaid. 5. Grants to Third Parties. Grantor expressly agrees that it will not, without the consent, joinder and agreement in writing of Grantee, voluntarily afford to any third party or parties, including, without limitation, the grantee named in the Kinder-Care Agreement its successors in interest, transferees or assigns, and the grantee named in the Eshelman Agreement, his successors in interest, transferees and assigns, any rights or interests in or affecting the Servient Premises or the easements and interests afforded the Grantee hereunder, it being DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 3 Page 3 of 8 Pages specifically acknowledged on the part of the Grantor that any such rights or interests afforded any such third party or parties will result in irreparable harm to Grantee and Grantee's Premises herein described. 6. Improvement, Maintenance and Repair of Servient Premises. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that by means of the Kinder-Care Agreement and the Eshelman Agreement above-mentioned, each of the grantees thereunder and their respective successors in interest and assigns, became obligated for maintenance and repair of "...the shared drive..." subject of and described in each of said agreements "...so long as the lands to the west which are benefited by the shared drive contain no more than two single family residences." The Grantor and Grantee further acknowledge that said agreements and each of them further provide as follows: In the event the lands to the west are developed to increase the vehicular burden on the shared drive, then from such time forward the cost of maintaining that portion of the shared drive constructed to the west of that point 120 feet to the west of S.W. Hall Boulevard shall be shared prorate(sic) to the amount of square footage of each parcel which has access to S.W. Hall Boulevard through said shared drive,. . . Accordingly, the Grantor and Grantee hereby undertake and agree that, as respects that portion of any shared driveway now existing upon the Servient Premises lying within 120 feet of the easterly boundary of S.W. Hall Boulevard and with respect to that portion of any surface improvements hereafter constructed or reconstructed upon the easterly 120 feet of the Servient Premises for the purpose of vehicular access and egress only which are used by or for the benefit of the grantees named in said agreements, their successors in interest or assigns, or any of said parties, the Grantor and the Grantee shall bear the cost to maintain and repair such shared driveway and surface improvements which it is not the obligation of the grantees under said agreements to bear as aforesaid, in accordance with the formula implicit in the terms of said agreements set forth above. As respects that portion of all and any other improvements, of whatever kind or nature which are now existing or hereafter constructed or reconstructed, placed er installed on, beneath or above the surface of the Servient Premises, including, but not limited to, surface improvements provided for the purposes of vehicular access and egress only, which do not benefit, and are not used in connection with, any use or improvements occurring on premises not owned by the Grantor or the Grantee, the Grantor and the Grantee, shall share in the costs to install and construct, and to repair and maintain, any and all such other improvements in shares reasonably and fairly proportionate to the benefit conferred by such improvements on their respective lands and the improvements now, and at anytime hereafter, constructed thereon. In establishing the reasonably and fairly proportionate shares of costs to be borne by the Grantor and the Grantee as stated above, the following factors shall be applied: a. Whether the subject improvement in fact benefits the lands and improvements of the Grantor and the Grantee in the sense that such improvement is necessary in order for such lands and improvements to be used and occupied. If no such benefit is provided, no share of the costs entailed in installing and constructing and repairing and maintaining shall be borne by the owner of the lands and improvements not benefited. b. Whether the subject improvement costs more to install or construct within or upon the Servient Premises because it benefits the lands and improvements of both parties rather than the lands and improvements of one party exclusively. If the subject improvement benefits the land and improvements of both the parties and if the costs to install or construct such improvement are not at least five percent (5%) greater than they would be if they benefited the lands and improvements of one party exclusively, then the costs to install or construct, and the costs to maintain and repair, such improvement shall be shared equally by the Grantor and Grantee. But if such costs are at least five percent (5%) greater because such improvements benefit the lands and improvements of both parties, then the cost to install or construct such improvement within or upon DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 4 of 8 Pages the Servient Premises for the exclusive use and benefit of the Grantor's lands and the cost to install or construct such improvements within or upon the Servient Premises for the exclusive benefit of the lands and improvements of the Grantee shall be determined and combined (added) to form the denominator of a fractional share, the numerator of which, as respects each party, shall be the cost to install or construct such improvement within or upon the Servient Premises for the exclusive benefit of such party. Such fraction shall then be used to determine each party's share of the cost to install or construct such improvement within or upon the Servient Premises as well as each party's share of the future cost to maintain or repair such improvement. c. Whether or not the necessity to maintain or repair an improvement within or upon the Servient Premises is caused or contributed to by wrongful or negligent act or omission of the Grantor or the Grantee or of any person or persons, regardless of their status as an owner, lessee, tenant, licensee, invitee or trespasser, entering, leaving, coming on to, using or occupying the lands or improvements of the Grantor or the Grantee other than the Servient Premises or some portion thereof. If maintenance or repair of an improvement within or upon the Servient Premises, or the Servient Premises themselves, is not caused by the wrongful or negligent act or omission of Grantor or Grantee or any person or persons entering, leaving, coming on to, using or occupying the lands or improvements of either the Grantor or Grantee as aforesaid, the costs of any such maintenance or repair shall be shared by the Grantor and the Grantee as described in the next preceding paragraph. Otherwise, such costs shall be borne in their entirety by the party whose wrongful or negligent acts or omissions caused or contributed to the need that such costs be incurred or by the party owning the lands or improvements subject of entering, leaving, coming on to, use or occupancy by such person or persons. d. Whether or not an improvement installed or constructed within or upon the Servient Premises requires maintenance or repair, replacement, reconstruction or upgrading due to changes in, or intensification of, uses or activities occurring upon, or development, or improvements of, the lands of the Grantor or the Grantee. If, solely by reason of such changes or intensification, an improvement previously installed or constructed within or upon the Servient Premises must be maintained, repaired, replaced, reconstructed, upgraded, relocated or otherwise modified, all costs associated with maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction, upgrading, relocation or other modification, including any and all resulting costs and expenses incurred with respect to other improvements affected by such actions,are to be borne by the owner of lands upon which such changes or intensified uses or activities have occurred or will occur regardless of any incidental benefits which might in the future be conferred on other lands having potential access to such improvement. However, if any such maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction, upgrading, relocation or other modification results in any immediate and direct enhancement of services or in the kind, quality or quantity of services or utilities, actually available to, and used or consumed on, the lands of the other party, then the costs of future maintenance or repair of such improvement shall be borne equally between the Grantor and the Grantee. 7. Taxes on Servient Premises. If the Grantor, the Grantee, or both the Grantor and Grantee, shall become obligated as the owners of lands benefited by improvements installed, constructed or used within or upon the Servient Premises, for the payment of any taxes, excises or assessments levied based on the value of such improvements or upon the rights and interests afforded under this instrument, as distinguished from the unimproved value of the real property comprising the Servient Premises, then the Grantor and the Grantee shall each respectively assume, pay and satisfy such taxes, excises or assessments promptly and before any portion thereof shall become in arrears or past due. Grantor shall fully pay and satisfy any such taxes, excises or assessments levied based on the unimproved value of the real property comprising the Servient Premises all as hereinafter prescribed: DECLARATION OF EASEMENT S Page 5 of 8 Pages a. On or before the 31st day of December each year commencing with the year 1997, Grantor shall deliver to Grantee, and Grantee shall deliver to Grantor, at their respective addresses appearing on the real property • tax rolls of Washington County, Oregon, a statement in writing setting forth the amount which the party delivering said statement contends such party has incurred in the way of liability for the payment of taxes, excises andlor assessments levied on or with respect to said improvements, rights and interests as aforesaid during the fiscal tax year beginning on the first day of July of such year. b. Not later than the 15th day of February of the year following the date upon which statements are to be delivered as aforesaid, each party shall deliver to the other party at the address of the other party mentioned above, a second statement setting forth the amount, if any, which the party delivering such statement claims the party to whom such statement is delivered is obligated to pay to, or reimburse, the party delivering such statement, on account of the total amount of taxes, excises and/or assessments levied on, or with respect to, said improvements, rights and interests previously paid or thereafter payable, by the party delivering such statement and claim. c. Said obligations shall be determined each year in accordance with the same factors based upon which both parties' respective shares of the costs of maintenance and repair of all improvements installed within or upon the Servient Premises would otherwise be determined on the first day of the fiscal tax year subject of such statements in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this instrument. d. If, according to the second statements exchanged by the Grantor and the Grantee as aforesaid, the net difference between the amounts, if any, each party claims the other is obligated to pay or reimburse it on account of all taxes, excises and assessments subject of such party's second statement, does not exceed the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) neither party shall be obliged to pay or reimburse the other any amount whatsoever on account of such taxes, excises andlor assessments. Otherwise, the net difference between the two amounts claimed, to the extent the same exceeds the sum of one thousand dollars, shall be paid by the party which advanced the lesser claim to the party which advanced the greater claim, or the parties shall undertake to compromise their differences, within thirty(30)days following the date both second statements shall have been delivered as aforesaid and, failing such compromise, the matter shall be submitted to binding arbitration as hereinafter described. e. In the event either the Grantor or the Grantee shall fail, neglect or refuse, for any reason whatsoever, to deliver to the other either the first or second statement at the time and in the manner above stated, then the party who delivered such statements and each of them as aforesaid shall be entitled to recover from the other party whatever amount the party delivering such statements contends, in such party's second statement, the other party is obliged to pay or reimburse the party who delivered such statements and such contention shall be deemed final, conclusive and binding on both parties for all purposes whatsoever. 8. Duty to Insure; Indemnification. At all times, the Grantor and the Grantee shall each and severally procure and maintain at their sole cost and expense, one or more policies or contracts of insurance providing coverage and indemnity, in an insured amount of not less that $1,000,000.00, for and against losses and damages claimed by or on behalf of the other party, and by third parties, including, without limitation, damages for loss, damage and depreciation of personal property, bodily injury and loss of life, arising out of the use or condition of the Servient Premises and all improvements now, or at anytime hereafter, placed, located, installed, constructed or used thereon and for any such claims arising out of the any insurable activities conducted thereon by any third party or parties employed by or on behalf of the Grantor or the Grantee for the purposes of installing, constructing, maintaining or repairing any and all such improvements. At all times, the Grantor and the Grantee shall each and severally keep and maintain at their own expense their respective interests in the Servient Premises insured DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 6 of 8 Pages against fire and such other risks and casualties as they may respectively, and from time-to-time, each and independently determine to insure. Provided, however, that the Grantor and the Grantee do hereby expressly • agree one with the other, that they will fully indemnify and save harmless the other from, for and against all and any losses, liabilities, claims, damages and expenses, including without limitation costs of defense and attorneys' fees, which the other may at anytime suffer or incur which are caused, to the extent the same are contributed to, by the wrongful or negligent acts or omissions of their respective employees, agents, representatives, tenants, invitees, licensees, permittees, contractors, and subcontractors andlor by any casualty or occurrence for which such party might have obtained insurance commonly available at reasonable cost in relation to the magnitude of the risks insured, by reason of their respective interests in, and contractual undertakings with respect to, the Servient Premises herein described or established. 9. Arbitration. If any dispute arises between the Grantor and the Grantee hereunder, the same shall be submitted to arbitration for final and binding determination. Either the Grantor or the Grantee may request arbitration of any such dispute and appoint one individual to act in the capacity of an arbitrator. Upon receipt of any such request for arbitration, the other party may appoint one individual to act in the capacity of an arbitrator and the two arbitrators so appointed shall appoint a third arbitrator. If the appointment of either the second or third arbitrator is not made within ten (10) days of appointment of the arbitrator previously appointed, then either the Grantor or the Grantee may apply to the presiding judge of Washington County, Oregon, to appoint the required arbitrator. The arbitrators so appointed shall proceed according to the Oregon statutes governing arbitration (currently contained in Chapter 36, Oregon Revised Statutes), and the award of the arbitrators shall have the effect therein provided. Said arbitration shall take place in Washington County, Oregon. The costs of the arbitration shall be shared equally by the parties, but each party shall pay its own attorney fees incurred in connection therewith unless otherwise determined by the award on arbitration. In the conduct of any such arbitration, each party shall have the right to conduct discovery by all and any means available to parties engaged in civil litigation then pending in the U.S. District Court for Oregon, sitting at Portland. 10. Parties Bound. This instrument and the terms and provisions herein contained shall bind, and inure to the benefit of the Grantor, the Grantee and the successors in interest, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the Grantor and the Grantee. 11. Effects of Conflicts With Other Agreements. Insofar as the terms of this instrument may now, or at any time hereafter, be deemed or construed to conflict with the terms or provisions of any other and prior agreement or instrument purporting to fix, describe, create or establish rights and interests in the Servient Premises or any portion thereof to which the Grantor or the Grantee, or their predecessors in interest, may be parties, then to the extent possible in conformity with applicable legal and equitable principles and precedent, this instrument and the terms and provisions herein contained shall be afforded precedence, replace and supersede such conflicting terms and provisions of said prior agreement or instrument and the same shall be null, void and of no further effect whatsoever. 12. Remoteness of Vesting; Severability. If, and in the event, any rights, interests or claims arising, or which might arise, under or which are described in, or created by, this instrument shall be deemed or construed by any court or tribunal having lawful jurisdiction to do so, to conflict with, or rendered unenforceable, unrecognizable or void by reason of, any rule of law or equity pertaining to remoteness of vesting, then such terms or provisions shall be deemed and construed enforceable and valid for so long, and to such extent, as such rule of law shall permit, and no longer or further. If any terms or provisions of this instrument shall be found invalid or unenforceable to any extent by judgment or decree of any court or tribunal having lawful jurisdiction to do so, the DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 7 Page 7 of 8 Pages - validity and enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions shall 1 I t be affected and the same shall be construed to effect the evident intent of the parties insofar as reaso,:b pissible. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor and the Grantee have her:un o : I • Alt! . fective as of the latest date set forth below. I '' 1 1 BRAHMAPREMANANDA ASHRAMA, an Oregon �A`i. AA non-profit corporation, G antor M"AEL J. I' LIS Grantee BY �- -.— __ Swami Viswa Premananda, President By Bharat Naik, Secretary State of Oregon, County of CO _L&vr1jtO } s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before me on- . 2 t , 1997, by SWAMI VISWA PREMANANDA as President of Brahmapremananda Ashrama, an Oregon non-profit corporation. 1-A,(1k( S-61111A,1 ..-a�.:; OFFICIAL SEAL •ti�rt_„a'P+C- BROOKE LAHMArr Notary Public for Oregont ,,i `;;`- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires (. 7`) o(J MY COMMISSIONIEXPIRES UN 03E ,2000 State of Oregon, County of C _ ,_ ALI } s.s. This instrument was acknowledged before me on -PS(i_GJ . Zip, 1997, by Bharat Naik as Secretary of Brahmapremananda Ashrama,an Oregon on-profit corporation. . .a.,.:''. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon �'� ' BROOKE UNMAN �'� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires (0111.__071/.) `•.% COMMISSION NO.054635 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 03,2000 State of Oregon, County of ('\jjAYy ) s.s. This instrument ., nowledge before me on g-5,9 , 1997, by Michael J. Nedelisky. ,:,,r4.. ..,.\ c , 9,,, ,,,,k), 1 dell*,.. OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon , ; ROBIN L.COCHEU '�''"s ' NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON My Commission Expires CI-M-99 .fi' COMMISSION NO.047466 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 27, 1999 DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 8 of 8 Pages "EXHIBIT A" TO DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Brahmapremananda Ashrama, Grantor; Michael J. Nedelisky, Grantee; [Description of Servient Premises) BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DECRIBED AS PARCELS I, II AND III IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1995, AS FEE NO. 95001169, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY AND STATE OF OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1995, FEE NO. 95055808, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND THE "POINT OF BEGINNING"; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCELS II AND III IN SAID DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95001169 SOUTH 2°03'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.23 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN SAID DEED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°03'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 287.47 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SOUTHWEST HALL BOULEVARD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 947); THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 0°56'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 32.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°51'54"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 338.23 FEET; THENCE ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 50.00 FEET DISTANT TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCELS II AND III NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 148.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89°57'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE "POINT OF BEGINNING". CONTAINING 17,180 FEET MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT A DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Page 1 of 1 Pages "EXHIBIT B" TO DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Brahmapremananda Ashrama, Grantor; Michael J. Nedelisky, Grantee; [Description of Grantee's Premises] A TRACT COMPRISED OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS RECORDED AUGUST 10,1995 AS FEE NO'S 95055810 AND 95055812 AND PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY IN THE STATE OF OREGON BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE THOMAS A. STOTT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 53; THENCE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 780.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808 AND THE "POINT OF BEGINNING"; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT NORTH 87°57'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 2°03'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°06'23"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 91.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 87°58'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 107.57 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACTS RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055810 AND 95055812 NORTH 02°57'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 283.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.217;THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE ON A 11,319.16 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST (CHORD BEARS SOUTH 49°34'48" EAST, .420.66 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 420.69 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO.95055812 SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 19, BLOCK "0", "METZGER ACRE TRACTS", THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°03'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.32 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055810; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED AS FEE NO. 95055808 SOUTH 2°03'00"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 115.07 FEET TO THE"POINT OF BEGINNING". CONTAINING 56,133 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT B DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 10 Page 1 of 1 Pages