Loading...
SDR1999-00026 SDR1999 - 00026 BANK OF PORTLAND I NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00026 CITY OF TIGARD Community<Development BANK OF PORTLAND Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS =7/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: BANK OF PORTLAND CASE NO. Site Development Review SDR1999-00026 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval for new construction of a 3,529 square foot two-story office building. APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Leek„ General Contractor Attn: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman 5210 SE 26 Avenue P.O. Box 847 Portland, Oregon 97205 Portland, Oregon 97308 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General-Commercial District; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G; General-Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, min-warehouse, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 6505. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026—BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 1 OF 34 s • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 4. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 68t Parkway as a part of this project: A. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per Tigard Triangle Design Standards; B. driveway apron. 5. The applicant's construction plans shall include the proposed relocation of the existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 6. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 7. The applicant shall revise the plans and increase the width of the building along SW 68th Parkway to a minimum of 50% of the frontage or approximately 39 feet. 8. The applicant shall revise the plans and locate the building within 0 to 10 feet from the 68th Parkway frontage. The maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. 9. The applicant shall revise the plans and pprovide landscaping, an arcade, or a hard surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path along 68t Parkway between the structure (building) and the street. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard along the public street. 10. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate paving materials as scored concrete or modular paving materials on the walkway system between the building entrance and the public street in accordance with Section 18.620.030.4 of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026—BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 2 OF 34 11. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.030.5 and Section 18.745.050. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and '/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60-foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Shrubs shall not exceed three feet in height in accordance with Diagram 2 of Section 18.620.030. The acer circinatum (vine maple) shall be placed no greater than 15 feet apart, with no gaps along the north, east, or south parking lot edge, or the applicant may propose another tree type and demonstrate how it will meet the tree spacing standard. For any tree proposed, the applicant shall provide a standard acceptable landscape tree classification reference or determination by a landscape architect that the proposed tree is adequately spaced for mature growth, meets the spacing standard in the TDC and is appropriate for the climate. The applicant shall indicate the branching width at maturity of the pinus nigra from a standard landscape reference source, or landscape architect. 12. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate clearly all proposed exterior finish materials for review and approval in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.040.4. 13. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate the specific roof material for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.5 (18.620.040.5). 14. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate where roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be located and how it will be screened from the adjacent public street for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.6 (18.620.040.6). 15. The applicant shall submit a separate application for a sign permit for the free-standing sign, and shall re-locate the sign for review and approval in conjunction with TDC Chapter 18.620 and Chapter 18.780, Signs. 16. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial, trees shall be planted at 3Y2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two 2) years. Any tree planted in excess ofya 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. 17. The applicant shall address all the standards from the TDC but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765 to demonstrate compliance with Section 18.705.030.C., Joint Access. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the City Engineer in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access use or to update existing joint access agreements considering any changes to the accesses as a result of this development and must be recorded with Washington County and placed on permanent file with the City. 18. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and add walkways to provide connectivity between the building entry and the public street sidewalk in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. 19. In order to satisfy the requirements of the TDC Section 18.705.030.1, the applicant shall provide evidence of the following: 1 ) that fire and safety requirements can be met, 2) the access will be marked with a one-way only permanent sign, 3) the egress will be marked with a no access sign, 4) all provisions of Section 18.705.030.J are met, and 5) that all provisions and conditions under Section 18.705.030.0 of this decision are met. 20. The applicant shall provide plans that show the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site, and the access width and pavement width of the proposed egress. 21 . The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and specifications and provide sufficient detail to determine that the buffer to the south of the site is adequate to meet the standards of Section 18.745.050 including fence height, buffer width, tree spacing and density of shrub planting. The buffer width (with a six (6) foot high fence) is fifteen (15) feet where the site abuts a residential use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 3 OF 34 22. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and provide a minimum 2 and '/2 inch caliper tree in the landscape island in the parking lot along with tree classification data (size, height and climate) for review and approval. 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan and clearly indicate the location, size, and screening of the trash enclosure(s) in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non- residential buildings, or 25 square feet of storage area based on the building's size of 3,529 square feet. 24. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. 25. The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. 26. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 27. The applicant shall provide lighting for the walkway, or provide evidence that the building will not be used during night-time hours. The lighting plan shall indicate proposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (if any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property, as well as, all locations and types of building and parking lot lighting. 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans to include two (2) bicycle parking spaces in accordance with the design standards in CDC Section 18.765.050. 29. The applicant shall have a certified arborist revise the tree plan to include the following: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Protective four (4') foot high orange construction fencing shall be placed around all trees to be preserved prior to the issuance of a site permit, and shall be maintained until final building inspection. 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and provide dimensions for the van accessible parking space. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 31 . Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 32. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 4 OF 34 • Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 34. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 35. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 36. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facilit for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 37. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 38. A sign shall be posted for each accessible parking space. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible' mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PROVISIONS; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: All sign changes and additions (except where specifically identified in this decision) the shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780. Section 18.725.020 requires compliance with applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. All future tenants shall be in compliance with the Environmental Performance Standard as set forth in federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations, and compliance is a continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was developed as a continuation of SW 69`h Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of-way and was later abandoned. Prior property line adjustments were approved on this site under Case file Nos. M1S1999-00022 and MIS1999-00023. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 5 OF 34 Vicinity Information: The site is located east of SW 68th Parkway and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5. The property is located to then south of and in close proximity of 99W, but does not front 99W. To the west of the subject site is 68 Parkway and pproperty zoned General Commercial which is in commercial use (Newport Bay Restaurant) to west of 68' Parkway. To the northwest of the subject site is property zoned General Commercial which is in commercial use (Carrows Restaurant). To the north of the subject site is property zoned property General Commercial which is in commercial use (Carrows Restaurant). To the east of the subject site is property zoned General Commercial and heavily treed at the portion of the property which abuts the Bank of Portland site; and the property to the east is the Portland General Electric power station. To the southeast of the site is property zoned Mixed Use Employment which is heavily treed adjacent to the subject site. To the southwest of the site is property zoned General Commercial, and in residential use. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposed site is a narrow rectangular lot approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres). This project is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot, two-story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The building is proposed to be located along the northern property line and aththe west end of the lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68` Parkway Icy a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68 Parkway. Due to the site location within the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The proposed building design takes advantage of the diagonal frontage by employing a saw-tooth design concept along the frontage for visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located on the eastern portion of the building. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct new offices for a commercial lending bank. This use is classified in Community Development Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Office. The site is located within the General-Commercial District. Table 18.520.1 lists Office as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Tyoe II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Oficer. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No neighborhood comments were submitted. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 6 OF 34 A. Zoninci Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Community Plan Standards 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) C. S•ecific Uev-I• •ment Standards • 'ccess, gress : ircu a ion) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping_and Screening) 18.755 Mixed SolidlNaste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 isual Clearance) D. Land Use Decisions 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) 18.390 (Im act Study Section 18.390.040) E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Ufility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the rovisions of Code Chapters:18.715 (Density Computations), 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations), (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 Sensitive Lands), 18.785 Temporary Uses 18.797 Water Resources Overlay District), 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General-Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: EXCERPT FROM C-G STANDARDS FROM TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Minimum Lot Size None - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft [6] - Side facing street on corner&through lots [1] - Side yard 0/20 ft [3] - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 0/20 ft [3] - Distance between front of garage& property line abutting - a public or private street. Maximum Height 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The net site area is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres). According to the applicant, there is approximately 4,256 square feel (10 acres) of abandoned improvements along with the existing storm sewer. The two-story office building is 3,529 square feet with a total footprint of 2,699 square feet. The second story is 830 square feel The total proposed building coverage equals 12.16% of the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 7 OF 34 The total proposed landscaping is 47% of the site, which exceeds the minimum 15% requirement; this is due largely to the fact that the eastern portion of the site will not be developed (approximately 143 linear feet, and 8,071 square feet undeveloped). The total building and impervious surface coverage is 53% of the site, which is considerably less than the maximum site coverage of 85%. The proposed minimum lot width is 56.44 feet which meets the minimum lot width requirement of 50 feet. The maximum building height measured from the midpoint of the main hipped roof on the second story of the building is approximately 26.5 feet which is well below the 45-foot maximum height requirement. Minimum building setbacks are 0 feet on all sides, as the property does not abut a residential zoning district (there is residential use, however, it is zoned C-G southwest of the site). The building is located at the northwestern corner of the site along the northern property line, therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: The proposed building and site design meets the standards for minimum lot width, minimum setbacks, maximum height requirement, maximum site coverage, and minimum landscape coverage. Therefore, this standard is met. B. COMMUNITY PLAN AREA STANDARDS TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.620 Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to ublic facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: Section 18.620.020 All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met (either the Design Option or the Performance Option). Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.370.010 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. The Performance Option has been selected over the Design Option, in this case, as street connections can not meet the Design Option criteria for street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet and bike and pedestrian connections at no more than 330 feet. Performance Option A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile. The local street spacing for 68th Parkway which adjoins 69th Avenue to the south, is addressed in the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 8 OF 34 Tigard Street Plan. The length of this street is approximately 6,000 linear feet, which would require 9 intersections. There are seven existing intersections and two planned intersections, therefore, this standard is met. B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector, or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance standard, has been interpreted as the distance from a driveway entrance to a collector or larger classification street. In tthis case, the project meets this standard because the only driveway entrance is located right at 68 Avenue, a Minor Arterial in the TTDS and a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The shortest pedestrian trip standard has been interpreted to mean that a pedestrian should not have to travel more than one and one-half (1 and %) the shortest straight line distance from the driveway entrance to the farthest building entrance. As the distance from the driveway entrance to the only building entrance at the southeast corner of the building is one straight line distance, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met. Site Design Standards: Section 18.620.030 All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials - Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Thy site fronts 68th Parkway is classified as a Minor Arterial in the Tigard Triangle Design District. 68t Parkway is the only street which abuts the site. The proposed new building occupies 37.5 feet of the 78.5-foot frontage. As 50% of the frontage is approximately 39 feet, the standard is not met. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and increase the width of the building along SW 68th Parkway to a minimum of 50% of the frontage or approximately 39 feet. Building setback - The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The building is setback approximately fifteen feet (15') from the public street right-of-way (after ROW dedication) at 68 Parkway at the southwestern corner of the building, and approximately nineteen feet (19') from the northwestern corner of the site. FINDING: This criterion is not met, as the building's front setback is greater than 10 feet from the public street right-of-way. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:ThT applicant shall revise the plans and locate the building within 0 to 10 feet from the 68t Parkway frontage. The maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. Front yard setback design - Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedesfrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 9 OF 34 • streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. The applicant's landscape plan indicates some low level landscaping,,_and street trees between the structure and the public street. The building only abuts one street, 68`h Parkway. The applicant has indicated two street trees (ars-davidii), spaced 25 feet apart, and some shrubs in front of the southwest corner of the building. No information was provided by the applicant to substantiate the tree size or classification. The proposed landscaping does not cover the entire landscaping area between the building and the public street to meet the L-1 standard. The existing sidewalk indicated on the plans is 8 feet wide, which is the standard width for a public sidewalk. FINDING: This standard is not met, as the proposed landscaping does not meet the L-1 standard nor does the sidewalk proposed meet the standard for an expansion of the pedestrian path. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and provide landscaping, an arcade, or a hard surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path along 68 Parkway between the structure (building) and the street. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard along the public street. Walkway connection to building entrances - A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. The applicant's plans appear to indicate a six-foot (6') wide walkway from the building entrance at the southeast corner of ¶kie building, along the south side of the building and connecting to the existing public sidewalk at 68 Parkway. No paving materials are indicated on the applicant's plans. FINDING: The walkway system does not meet this standard as no paving materials are indicated on the plans. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate paving materials as scored concrete or modular paving materials on the walkway system between the building entrance and the public street in accordance with Section 18.620.030.4 of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Parking location and landscape design - Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way ust be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. See Diagram 2. Parking is located to the rear of the building accessed via the access drive off of 68th Parkway. The interior side and rear yards are required to be landscaped to a L-2 standard which requires trees at a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Along the north side yard (along the parking lot), new 2-inch caliper vine maple trees (acer circinatum) are shown on the landscape plan as approximately 18 feet on center. Along the rear (east) of the proposed developed portion of the site and parking rot, new 2-inch caliper vine maple trees are proposed and shown as no greater than 28 feet on center . The acer circinatum is described in the Sunset Western Garden Book, Sunset Publishing Company Fifth Edition, 1988, Menlo Park, California as follows: Deciduous shrub or small trees. Zones 1-6, 'f4-17 (Portland, Oregon is in climate Zone b as indicated on p. 36 of the Sunset Garden Book). Crooked, sprawling, and-vine-like in the forest shade, with many stems from the base; single-trunked small tree 5-35 feet high in full sun. Loses its vine-like characteristics in open situations." According to Section 18.745.050.B.4, the acer circinatum would be classified as a small or narrow-stature tree, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at maturity, and shall be spaced no greater than 15 feet apart. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 10 OF 34 For a portion of the south side yard along the parking lot, existing cedar trees are indicated on the plan approximately 4 feet on center; and at the southeast corner of the site two-inch (2") caliper (pinus nigra) trees are indicated approximately eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet on center. The pinus nigra, or Austrian Black Pine, is described in the Sunset Western Garden Book as "slow to moderate growth, usually not above 40 feet in gardens. Tree of strong character which will serve either as landscape decoration or as windbreak in cold regions." As the applicant did not provide any information regarding the width of branching at maturity, the tree classification for spacing standards cannot be determined at this time. There are some gaps in the parking lot landscape screening on the south side yard for about 60 feet. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60-foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.030.5 and Section 18.745.050. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60- foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Shrubs shall not exceed three feet in height in accordance with Diagram 2 of Section 18.620.030. The acer circinatum (vine maple) shall be placed no greater than 15 feet apart, with no gaps along the north, east, or south parking lot ed e, or the applicant may propose another tree type and demonstrate how it will meet the tree spacing standard. For any tree proposed, the applicant shall provide a standard acceptable landscape tree classification reference or determination by a landscape architect that the proposed tree is adequately spaced for mature gqrowth, meets the spacing standard in the TDC and is appropriate for the climate. The applicant shall indicate the branching width at maturity of the pinus nigra from a standard landscape reference source, or landscape architect. Building Design Standards: Section 18.620.40 (18.620.040) All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Ground floor windows - All street-facing, elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three L3) feet above grade to nine (9),feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. This criteria is applicable to the west elevation, which faces the street. The west elevation has approximately 225 square feet of ground floor wall area between three and nine feet in height, therefore, 112.5 square feet of wall area is required to be ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings. The applicant's west elevation indicates approximately 117 square feet of ground floor windows. FINDING: This standard is met as an adequate amount of ground floor windows are shown on the applicant's west elevation to meet the 50% ground floor window standard. Building facades - Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building.off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The east and west elevations are 37.5 feet in width and are varied via building wall variation/off-set. Therefore, these facades do not extend more than 50 feet without a variation as required. The east elevation has a saw-tooth style profile on the facade, and the west elevation is broken by an inset building entry. The hipped roof-lines of the first and second story multiple masses that make up the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 11 OF 34 building add variation to the building form. The south elevation is approximately 74 feet in length and is cut back to approximately 53 feet in mass at the southern-most portion of the facade by the inset building entrance on the southeast corner and the saw-tooth cut design on the southwest corner. There is a concrete column at the southeast corner of the building entry. The second story of the south elevation is set back and broken down into two masses with hipped roofs to meet the building off-set standard. An additional design feature is recommended along the south and north elevation. The north elevation is similar to the south elevation, except that there is an 82-foot of length on the ground floor façade. However, the second floor massing creates a building off-set so that there is no more than 50 feet without a façade variation as required under this standard. Building material is brick veneer on all of the facades. FINDING: This standard is met. Weather protection - Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. FINDING: This criteria is met, as the applicant has indicated in the plans and elevations, weather protection for pedestrians at the building entrance. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. Proposed exterior finish material for the ground floor façade walls is brick veneer. According to the applicant's narrative, the second story facade will be horizontal lap siding. Elevations indicate an approximate six-inch (6") reveal of concrete at the foundation. No prohibited materials are indicated on the plans and elevations. FINDING: No prohibited materials are proposed, however, plans do not indicate the second story facade material. Therefore, in order to meet the criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate clearly all proposed exterior finish materials for review and approval in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.040.4. Roofs and roof lines - Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The applicant has proposed multiple hipped roofs over the building masses, and has not indicated clearly the roof material in the plans or elevations. The applicant's narrative does state the roofing materials will be "an architectural composition". The applicant has not proposed to use false fronts or false roofs as part of the building elevations. FINDING: This criterion is not met, as the specific type of roof materials is not indicated on the plans or elevations. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate the specific roof material for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.5 (18.620.040.5). Roof-mounted equipment - All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 12 OF 34 The applicant has not adequately addressed how it will screen roof-mounted equipment. The applicant's narrative does state that "roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be obscured from view". FINDING: This criterion is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate where roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be located and how it will be screened from the adjacent public street for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.6 (18.620.040.6). Signs: Section 18.620.050 In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code the standards as contained in Section 18.620.050 shall be met. This is a non-residential development within the C-G zone and, therefore, shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. One wall sign of 45 square feet is proposed on the north elevation. In accordance with Section 18.780.130C, wall signs shall not exceed, in gross area, 15 percent of any building face on which it is to be mounted. The square footage of the building face on which the sign is proposed to be mounted is 775 square feet, therefore, the sign is 6% of the building face on which it is mounted. One fifteen-foot (15') high free-standing sign is proposed with forty (40) square feet of signage per face. This sign meets the size and height standards for free-standing signs in the General Commercial zone as addressed under Chapter 18.780 in this decision, however, the sign will need to be re-located after the building setback is brought into conformance with the 0-10 foot building setback requirement of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, and a separate sign application is required. FINDING: The proposed wall sign meets this standard. The free-standing sign as it is proposed does not meet the standard due to its location between the building and the street as the building itself will need to be moved closer to the street to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which required a building setback between 0-10 feet. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a separate application for a sign permit for the free-standing sign, and shall re-locate the sign for review and approval in conjunction with TDC Chapter 18.620 and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Landscaping And Screening: Section 18.620.070 Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscapin or screening is defined within this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 Low Screen - For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots and along collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening , shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on Major and Minor Arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provided a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The building fronts 68th Parkway, which is a Minor Arterial in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The parking lot is setbacl' approximately 80 to 97 feet from the public street and is accessed via an access driveway off of 68 h Parkway. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 13 OF 34 CONDITION: Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial, trees shall be planted at 3'/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. L-2 General Landscaping — For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. This standard is addressed under Section 18.745.040, Street Trees and portions of Chapter 18.745 in this decision. Street and Accessway Standards: Section 18.620.080 Refers to Table 18.620.1 and accessway diagrams in this section. This section is incorporated and addressed under Section 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards in this decision. B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. The applicable TDC criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VI. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the Tigard Community Development Code: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces shall provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and minimum pavement width of 24 feet. Section 18.705.030.0 provides for joint access. Joint Access: Section 18.705.030.0 Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of and may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are places on permanent file with the City. Joint egress is proposed with the property to the northwest of the subject site. The applicant has not provided evidence that the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in the TDC including but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 14 OF 34 CONDITION:The applicant shall address all the standards from the TDC but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765 to demonstrate compliance with Section 18.705.030.C., Joint Access. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the City Engineer in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access use or to update existing joint access agreements considering any changes to the accesses as a result of this development and must be recorded with Washington County and placed on permanent file with the City. Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Proposed concrete walkways measure a minimum of five feet in width on the site plan and extend along the north side of the parking lot to the building entry. It is not clear from the plans whether the walkway is proposed to connect with the public sidewalk. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall- be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; This criteria is not applicable as the property is in commercial use. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no proposed walkways which cross vehicle access driveways on this site. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has not indicated the walkway material or proposed lighting (if any) for the walkway. The walkway material shall meet the Triangle Design Standards and is addressed elsewhere in this decision. FINDING: The proposed plan does not meet the standard. If the applicant meets the following conditions, the criteria will be met: CONDITIONS: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and add walkways to provide connectivity between the building entry and the public street sidewalk in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. • The applicant shall revise the plans and provide lighting for the walkway, or provide evidence that the building will not be used during night-time hours. Minimum Access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 15 OF 34 TABLE 18.705.3 -VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Spaces Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Driveways Required Width 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 50' 40' curbs required The development's frontage is along the SW 68th Parkway, a Minor Arterial under the Tigard Triangle Design District and a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Transportation Map. The applicant proposes to access the parking lot, located to the rear and east of the building, via a one-way drive with a 16-foot width. Egress from the parking lot is via an easement on the property to the north, currently the site of the Carrows Restaurant, and returning to SW 68 h Parkway. Vehicular access is provided to this commercial use and is within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrance at the southeast corner of the building. The applicant proposes twelve (12) parking spaces for the project. As there are between 0-99 parking spaces required, the minimum number of driveways required is one (1). The minimum access width is 30 feet with a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. However, this is a one-way access only. Therefore, Section 18.705.030.J is applicable, and includes special provisions for one-way accesses. Provided that the fire and safety requirements can be met, the access is marked with a one way only permanent sign, and the egress is marked with a no access sign, this standard could be met. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. Therefore, if the applicant meets the following condition, this standard shall be satisfied: CONDITION: In order to satisfy the requirements of the Section 18.705.030.1, the applicant shall provide evidence of the following: 1) that fire and safety requirements can be met, 2) the access will be marked with a one-way only permanent sign, 3) the egress will be marked with a no access sign, 4) all provisions of Section 18.705.030.J are met, and 5) that all provisions and conditions under Section 18.705.030.0 of this decision are met. One-way vehicular access points; Section 18.705.030.J Where proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The applicant has proposed one-way traffic flow on the site. The entrance drive off of 68th Parkway is situated closest to oncoming traffic on this site, and the exit drive is situated farthest from oncoming traffic for the site as it is located on the site to the north. The applicant has not provided the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site. FINDING: This standard is not met as the applicant has not provided the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall provide plans that show the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site, and the access width and pavement width of the proposed egress. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The applicant has included a statement in the narrative application that "there will no noise, visible emissions, vibration , odors, glare or heat from this project other than that normally anticipated from an office building. FINDING: This standard has been met. However, this is standard shall be maintained overtime therefore it is included in the general provisions of this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 16 OF 34 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 provides specific requirements for trees acing including: Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Subsection 2 which includes the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree, small, medium or large. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility policies to maintain visual clearance; Section 18.745.040.G, Granting of Adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4b There is approximately 78 feet of frontage along SW 68th Parkway. These standards are superceded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and are addressed under Section 18.620.030.5 and 18.620.070 in this decision. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). APPLICABLE SECTION OF BUFFER MATRIX TABLE 18.745.1 FOR C-G ZONE PROPOSED USE Commercial Zones EXISTING/ABUTTING USES (CC, CG,CP, CBD) Detached Single Units; Manufactured Units D Attached Single Units and Multifamily, D 1-5 Units, Duplexes Attached Single Units and Multifamily, D 5+ Units Mobile Home Parks D Commercial Zones (CC, CG, CP, CBD) -- Neighborhood Commercial Zone(CN) A Mixed Use Employment Zone (MUE) A Light Industrial Zones (IP, IL) A Heavy Industrial Zone (IH) D Parking Lots -- Arterial Streets -- Note: See Table 18.745.2 for alternative combinations for meeting these screening requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026—BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 17 OF 34 TABLE 18.745.2 BUFFER COMBINATIONS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING [1] Options Width(feet) Trees Shrubs or Groundcover Screening (per linear feet of buffer) A 10 -- Lawn/living -- 10 20' min/30' max spacing Lawn/living -- B groundcover C 1 10 Shrubs 4' hedges 2 8 15' min/30' max spacing Shrubs 5'fence 3 6 Shrubs 6'wall D 1 20 Shrubs 6' hedge 2 15 10' min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'fence 3 10 Shrubs 6'wall E 1 30 10' min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge or fence 2 25 Shrubs 5'earthen berm or wall F -- 40 10' min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge,fence,wall or berm [1] Buffers are not required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street as specified in Section 18.745.050 A2. [2] Adjustments from these requirements can be obtained;see Section 18.370.020 C4. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. The subject site abuts a residential use to the southwest. The Buffer Matrix Table 18.745.1 as illustrated in Table 18.745.2 indicates that when a Commercial zone abuts a residential use, the required Buffer and Screening Standard is D. The applicant's tans indicate a site-obscuring fence along the south property line abutting the residential use. Therefore, Bufferinc and Screening combination standard D-2 is applicable along the south property line where he site abuts a residential use and requires a butler width of 15 feet with trees placed between 10-20 feet apart and shrubs planted to standard. The applicant's plans indicate a 10-foot buffer which is not adequate. Buffering and Screening are addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (41 foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years o planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that wilt form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn ground cover, or bark mulch, or 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has proposed a six-foot (6') high site-obscuring fence along the portion of the site to be developed along the south property line. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. FINDING: This Buffering and Screening standards are not met. However, the standards will be met if the following condition is met. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and specifications and provide sufficient detail to determine that the buffer to the south of the site is adequate to meet the standards of Section 18.745.050 including fence height buffer width, tree spacin and density of shrub planting. The buffer width (with a six (6) foot high fence) shall be-fifteen (15) feet where the site abuts a residential use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 18 OF 34 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking_ and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking lot screening standard is superceded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standard as contained in Section 18.620.030.5. The applicant's plans do not indicate additional parking lot trees beyond the trees proposed to screen the edges of the parking lot along the north and south property lines, and along the east edge of the parking lot. There is one landscape island proposed on the parking lot, and no trees is proposed to be planted in it, therefore, this standard is not met. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and provide a minimum 2 and 1/2 inch caliper tree in the landscape island in the parking lot and provide tree classification data (size, height and climate)for review and approval. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Minimum standards method, Section 18.755.040.C5.b (2) states that non-residential buildings shall provide shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus 10 square feet /1000 square feet of GFA. The applicant's narrative application states that "a refuse and recycling enclosure is provided at the east end of the parking lot", and that this enclosure will comply with the franchise hauler requirements. However, the size of the trash enclosure is not indicated on the plans or in the narrative. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non-residential buildings. The minimum storage requirement for this 3,529 square foot office building is, therefore, 25 square feet. The applicant has not indicated screening for the trash enclosure. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, if the applicant meets the conditions listed below, this standard will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan and clearly indicate the location, size, and screening of the trash enclosure(s) in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non-residential buildings, or 25 square feet of storage area based on the building's size of 3,529 square feet. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 This Chapter is applicable for development projects when there is new construction, expansion of existing use, or change of use in accordance with Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 19 OF 34 General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; Unless otherwise specified Access, Egress and Circulation criteria are addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and The applicant has not specified the access drive material on the plans. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All parking spaces are served by a service drive, therefore, this standard is met. Pedestrian Access: Section 18.705.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This standard is addressed under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. In addition there are no known drop-off grade separations, therefore, this portion of the standard is not applicabl'e. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except-for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. This is a commercial development, therefore, this standard is applicable and shall be met through striping of parking spaces, directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 20 OF 34 Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not indicated wheel stops on the site plan and/or landscaping plan in accordance with this criterion, therefore, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. No lighting plan was submitted by the applicant. Therefore, this standard is not met and the applicant shall submit a lighting plan indicating proposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (pif any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. This standard is addressed under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, Section 18.620.050/ Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. From Figure 18.765.1 Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50%standard spaces, 50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. A A Parking Angle B Stall Width B C Stall Depth (no bumper overhang) E-{ D Aisle Width Between Stall Lines (5) E o E Stall Width Parallel to Aisle 1 F Module Width (no bumper overhang) G Bumper Overhang The applicant's plans do not indicate dimensions for parking spaces or aisle driveway width, as required, though it appears that the standard can be met. ATI standard 90 degree parking spaces shall be a minimum of 8'-5" wide by 18"-5" deep. All 90 degree compact parking spaces Shall be a minimum of 7'-5" wide by 16'-6" deep. A minimum 24 feet is required for aisle width between 90 degree stalls for two-way traffic. Compact spaces shall not exceed the 50% maximum on the site. Compact spaces shall not exceed the 50% maximum on the site. NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 21 OF 34 FINDING: The General Provisions for Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements has not been fully met. However, if the applicant meets the following conditions, the standard will be met: CONDITIONS: • All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. • All sign changes and additions (except as noted in this decision) shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. • The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. • The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. • The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. • The applicant shall submit a lighting plan indicating roposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (if any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The bicycle parking requirement for commercial office is .5/1000 square feet which is equivalent to two (2) bicycle spaces. The applicant has proposed in the narrative application to provide two (2) bicycle parking spaces near the front door, but has not shown them on the plans. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans to include two (2) bicycle parking spaces in accordance with the design standards in CDC Section 18.765.050. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The Director may reduce the total required off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070.H by up to a total of 20% by means of parking adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5a. The building is proposed for office use. The required minimum parking ratio is 2.7/1000 square feet of office building area. As the building is 3,529 square, a minimum of 10 parking spaces are required. The maximum parking ratio is 4.1/1000 or the equivalent of 15 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed 12 parking spaces including one van accessible parking space. FINDING: This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 Requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet. Each NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 2.2 OF 34 loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum the, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off- street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The building is 3,529 gross square feet which is less than the 10,000 gross square feet minimum requirement for a loading space. Therefore, no loading space is required. FINDING: This standard is met. SIGNS: CHAPTER 18.780 Zoning district Regulations: Section 18.780.130. Section 18.780.130.0 in the C-G and CBD zones. In the General Commercial zone one multi-faced, free-standing sign is permitted with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased one foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line, or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height. One fifteen-foot (15') high free-standing sign is proposed with forty (40) square feet of signage per face. This sign meets the size and height standards for free-standing signs in the General Commercial zone as addressed under Chapter 18.780 in this decision, however, the sign will need to be re-located after the building setback is brought into conformance with the 0-10 foot building setback requirement of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The applicant has proposed one wall sign and one free-standing sign. Signs are addressed in further detail under Section 18.620.050 in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the condition as listed under Section 18.620.050 in this decision. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a letter dated February 9, 2000 from Stephen J. Peacock, Certified Arborist regarding the applicant's tree removal plan. The applicant's tree plan does meet the requirements of Section 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement. Specifically, the plan is deficient in the following ways: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The plan only shows trees (12" or greater) to be removed rather than all existing tress (12" or greater). Other than stating that red tape has been placed on the trees to be removed, no protection program was provided by the applicant's arborist. According to the arborist, "the tree removal plan indicates that eleven (11) trees need to be removed in order for the building and parking lot to be built. Four (4) of the trees are less than twelve (12") inches in diameter. The land surveyor found that there are forty (40) trees with a diameter of twelve (12") inches or larger. Seven trees over twelve inches represents 17.5% of the total number of trees over twelve (12") inches identified on the site. This criteria is addressed further under the standards for Site Development Review as contained in Section 18.360.090.A.2 of this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 23 OF 34 FINDING: This standard is not met as the tree plan does not meet the requirements of Section 18.790.030. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall have a certified arborist revise the tree plan to include the following: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Protective four (4') foot high orange construction fencing shall be placed around all trees to be preserved prior to the issuance of a site permit, and shall be maintained until final building inspection. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The public street fronting the site is 68th Parkway which is a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map and requires a 30-foot visual clearance triangle on both sides of the access. The applicant has shown 30-foot visual clearance triangles at each side of the access to the site on the site plan as required. The plans indicate that the required clear vision area will be provided. FINDING: This criterion is met. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standards under Section 18.360.090.A are not applicable to the subject proposal as they relate only to residential uses: 3. (Exterior Elevations), 5. (Privacy and Noise: multi-family or group living uses), 6. (Private Outdoor Areas: multi-family use), 7. (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: multi-family use). Also inapplicable is the following standard: 8. (100-year floodplain). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; The applicant has not identified all existing tree locations on the plans, but has identified existing trees to be removed on the plan. According to the applicant's arborist, "the tree removal plan indicates that eleven (11) trees need to be removed in order for the building and parking lot to be built. Four (4) of the trees are less than twelve (12") inches in diameter. This represents 17.5% of trees to be removed (trees 12" or greater). As more than 75% of the trees are to be retained on the site, the building (and parking lot) are located to preserve existing trees. The site slopes to the south from an elevation of approximately 300 feet along the northern property line to approximately 292 feet along the southern property line, or a slope of roughly 11.4%. The building is located on the northwestern portion of the site with a slope of roughly 14%. The site drains to the east and southeast, and there is a drainageway or creek located at the far southeast end of the site which drains into Red Rock Creek. The building is sited close to the street and at the western end of the site to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, Chapter 18.620 addressed in this decision. The building's location is away from the drainageway or creek, and is reasonably sited to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage of the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 24 OF 34 Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has stated in the narrative application that the building is located in an area not subject to ground slumping or sliding as the building is built on the improved portion of a vacated street. The applicant stated "this is prima-facie evidence movement has not occurred in recent years". Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and The building is located approximately 33 feet from the southern property line which abuts residential property. The Carrows Restaurant parking lot is located to the north of the subject building. Though the Bank of Portland building is located on the northern property line, it abuts the parking lot of the property to the north. Therefore, there is adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting. No other buildings are in close proximity to the proposed Bank of Portland building. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The building's entry is located at the southeast corner of the site, and is therefore, located away from southwesterly and northwesterly winds of the Pacific Northwest. The second story of the building is located on the eastern side of the building. Windows are relatively evenly distributed on all elevations, so that sunlight is evenly distributed throughout the building. The building is oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Section 18.360.090.A.2.b states that trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. This is standard is addressed under Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is met. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: • The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. A buffer is required along the south property line where the developed portion of the site abuts a residential use as addressed in further detail in this decision under Section 18.745.050. The purpose of the buffer is to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, and to rovide a visual barrier. The size of the buffer required with a six-foot (6') fence and shrubs is fifteen feet (15'). No other buffer is required as all other abutting uses are either also in commercial use or do not require a buffer. This standard is addressed further under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. FINDING: The buffer standard is not met, as the applicant has not provided adequate buffer width on the plans. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the condition for buffering as listed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 25 OF 34 Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and Whether the screening needs to be year around. The applicant has proposed screening with a six-foot (6') high site-obscuring fence along the portion of the site to be developed (to the southeast corner of the parking lot), except in the area of visual clearance along 68 Parkway. The applicant has not proposed rooftop screening. Screening is also addressed under Section 18.745.050 and Section 18.620.070 in this decision. FINDING: This criterion has not been fully met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet then conditions as listed under Section 18.745.050 and Section 18.620.070 in this decision. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. As the building fronts the streets it defines the public space at the street. As the parking is located behind the building, the semi-public parking lot space is defined by the building and reinforced by the fence to the south. There is no proposed private space as part of this development site. FINDING: This standard is met, as public and semi-public space is clearly defined, and there is no private space. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes shall be located to prevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The windows are located relatively evenly on all building elevations. No exterior lighting plan was provided by the applicant. The applicant' s narrative states that down lighting will be in the soffits to enhance security and reduce glare into adjacent sites. The applicant has proposed in the narrative to provide parking lot illumination via 400 watt metal hallide (for light color quality) pole mounted shoe-box type fixture. A shoe-box fixture will direct the light down to reduce glare. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application, and offered no comments or objections. FINDING: The Police Department has not provided any objections or concerns with regard to the proposal, therefore, conceptually the proposed lighting is sufficient to meet the standard. However, the applicant shall meet the following condition in order to fully meet the standard: CONDITION:The applicant shall provide a lighting plan showing all locations and types of building and parking lot lighting. Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Tri-Met was notified, however, has not provided any comments on this application. The City does not required additional transit facilities for this site. FINDING: This standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 26 OF 34 Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. • In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and • A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The applicant proposes 47% of the gross site to be landscaped, which exceeds considerably the minimum 15% requirement for percentage of landscaping of the gross site area. There is approximately 36% of the gross site which will is currently vegetated and will be left undeveloped on the eastern portion of the site. FINDING: The minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be met with the proposed landscape plan, therefore, this criterion is met. Drainage_ Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This criterion is addressed under Street and Utility Improvements, Section 18.810.100.A and D under this decision. Provision for the disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. The requirement for accessible parking spaces for parking lots between 1 to 25 spaces is one (1) accessible parking space which shall be at least nine feet wide and shall have an adjacent access aisle, located on the passenger side that is at least six feet wide (except that two adjacent accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle). In addition, one in every eight accessible spaces, but not less than one shall be van accessible which is at least nine feet wide with an adjacent access aisle of at least eight feet wide. The applicant is required to have, and has provided one van accessible parking space. However, no parking space dimensions are shown on the plans. FINDING: The proposed parking plan does not meet this standard, as no parking space dimensions are shown on the plans. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the following conditions: CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the site plan and provide dimensions for the van accessible parking space. • A sign shall be posted for each accessible parking space. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 27 OF 34 Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant provided an impact study as part of the narrative portion of the application. According to the applicant's impact study: Based on a proposed square footage of 3, 529 and ITE code of 710 (institute of Traffic Engineers, 6th edition ISBN 0-93540309-11) 16.58 trips per day, per thousand gross leasable area (GSA) can be expected to be generated approximately additional 59 average weekday trips can be anticipated. The average weekday trip rate can be modified by .65 trip length and 1.0 link trip the actual average trip per day can be expressed in the following formula: (3.529 (1000sf) x 16.58= 58.51 x .65 trip length factor 38.03 Adjust for trip length x 1.00 Linked trip factor 38.00 total average trips per day. Other impacts according to the applicant's study: Increase in net impervious surface is 6,040 square feet. Addition of 100.50 cubic feet of storage to assure .30 cfs/acre, accomplished by means of surface detention basin, and if required a bioswale. Water and Sewer: Anticipated water consumption for domestic use to be approximately 300 cubic feet, per month, year round, and 2,450 cubic feet at peak irrigation months. Rough Proportionality Analysis The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. According to ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, office buildings generate 16.31 trips per thousand square foot per day, therefore, the Bank of Portland would be expected to generate 57.5 trips per day. As $184 is the office use per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF Ordinance, the estimated TIF is determined by multiplying $184 x 57.5 daily trips. Between July 1, 1999 and July 1 , 2000 (fees are scheduled to go up after July 1, 2000) it is estimated that the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $10,592 based on 3,529 square feet of office space. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $33,100 ($10,592 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $22,508. The applicant is required to dedicate approximately 5 feet of right-of-way (35 feet of ROW east of the roadway centerline required total). The estimated cost of this ROW dedication is $1,170 based on $3 per square feet of land area. Because the total transportation impact is $33,100, and the estimated cost of street dedication is $1 ,170 the proposed street dedication is easily proportional to the impact of the development. Therefore, the applicant is paying only a small portion of the projects impact on the transportation system. F. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 28 OF 34 Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080(A) of the TDC, Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requires a minor arterial street to have a 70-foot right-of-way width and 46-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, which is classified as a minor arterial in the TTDS. At present, this street is improved with adequate pavement width and curbing, but lacks street trees behind the existing sidewalk. The applicant should plant street trees per TDC standards. The applicant is also proposing to install a new concrete driveway to serve the new building. A street opening permit is required for any work in the public ROW. The most current tax assessor's map indicates that there is less than 35 feet of ROW east of the roadway centerline. Therefore, additional ROW is necessary from this site. The applicant must dedicate the additional ROW prior to issuance of a building permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. At present, there is a concrete sidewalk along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway. No other sidewalk improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site from SW 68th Parkway. The applicant is proposing to relocate a portion of this sewer line so that the new building can be properly located. Staff does not oppose the relocation, but the work will need to be covered by a public improvement permit from the City Engineer. Prior to construction, the plans for the sewer line work must be approved by the City Engineer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Based upon the applicant's onsite storm drainage plan, it appears that any upstream runoff will be adequately accommodated. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 29 OF 34 Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide on-site detention partially within their parking area and partially in a new pond structure to the east of their parking area. Staff reviewed the engineer's preliminary calculations and finds that the surface detention and the proposed pond will provide adequate detention volume to handle the additional runoff. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. The City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, therefore, no bikeway is required. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, therefore, no bikeway is required. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. This standard is not applicable as the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, and therefore, no bikeway is required. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 30 OF 34 • Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines in front of this site. All new utilities into this development must be placed underground. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides the public water in this area. The applicant must coordinate with TVWD with regard to the proposed water service for the building. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate they will treat their stormwater in an onsite water quality pond. The preliminary sizing calculations reviewed by Staff indicate that the proposed pond will sufficiently handle the additional runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan must be provided to the Building Division as a part of the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 31 OF 34 For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long-Range Planning Division has reviewed this application and provided the following comments: Are they getting a variance from the minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet? City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has provided the following comments: 1. The accessible route in front of the accessible parking space shall have a minimum width of 68 inches. The required width is 36 inches plus 32 inches for the vehicle overhang over the curb. 2. The fire department access route passing through the easement is impeded by the accessible parking stall and the island, and doesn't meet the required radius. Further, when they finalize this route, they will be required to treat that portion where this route crosses the accessible route as a marked crossing. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Property Manager/Operations Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Water Department./Utilities Manager has reviewed this application and commented that the site is outside of their water service area. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Fish and Wildlife has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: 1 . A site review completed during April, 2000. Based on our observations our comments focus on stormwater treatment and enhancement of the riparian habitat. Stormwater 2. The application indicated that detention will be provided but no bio-treatment of the water is proposed. Since the stormwater run-off discharges to a natural waterway, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife recommends that bio-treatment of the stormwater prior to discharging off-site. A design based upon the treatment standards outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management can modify the existing ditch into a bio-treatment pond or swale. 3. The trees removed for site preparation can be used to diversify the habitat around the stormwater treatment facility. The removal should allow the rootwads to remain attached to the trunk. ODFW is available to provide technical assistance for the placement of woody debris. Riparian Plantings 4. The eastern end of the property is currently dominated by non-native blackberries. This part of the site also includes parts of two drainageways. We strongly encourage the applicant to restore native vegetation on this part of the site to restore riparian functions (fish and wildlife habitat, water quality, flood storage) to benefit fish and wildlife resources. ODFW is willing to partner with the applicant and other interested group to replant the area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 32 OF 34 Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the application and provided the following comments.. On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. Tigard Planning Staff Response: The land-use application was submitted before February 4, 2000, and was deemed complete on March 15, 2000, therefore, the new R&O 00-7 does not apply. The applicable Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management were adopted by USA in 1996 including any future revisions or amendments. Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R & O. Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24 hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. Water Quality: Developer should provided a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Sensitive Area: A "Sensitive Area" exists in the vicinity of the site. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. Division of State Lands/Corps of Engineers: A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. ODOT was notified and provided no comments or objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified, but no comments were provided. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the application and has no objections. Tri-Met was notified, but no comments were provided. US West Communications was notified, but no comments were provided. PGE has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. NW Natural Gas was notified, but no comments were provided. TCI Cable has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) was notified, but no comments were provided. Oregon Division of State Lands was notified, but no comments were provided. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was notified, but no comments were provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 33 OF 34 SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 24, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal Tcision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 8, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 'l.1Yt erY �� � May 24. 2000 PREP RED .eY: Karen Perl Fo DATE Associate Planner :r May 24, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard s ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:curpin\ka ren\sdr\sdr99-26dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 34 OF 34 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A CRY OF TIOARD • EASEMFAT FROM ".14 aL.RO HOTEL 4,'"`P WALL 6181,.. ` e -' •4•'Si' S S S'Sf+' IO'114' qq 9 e\ • v` e \ rr_ I n 'A3z`�,\ row= waND cAP e 9 - PARK.*KAC[.. 6 DS'4316'E i- —PROPOSE13 •� _ 1111111111 , • X49 `� BUILDING b ./f\a , s„ l�I,IMF ,, ,6 a W .'�� PEDESTRIAN WALKWA"—� L, 142.:.0.1 �� eux a PORTLAND SIGN I n SW" .vtt iii Y ` N OY43'S6'W_ _ 9` L N 33.1.31. W ''. 61'— N!9'46'I'W� 1015' 0 ' ND9.49'66•W ‘...„1: ---\,_\ 1773' r = IpeS9• • ••' \ \ END *SW 69TH AVENUE IS NOW SW 68TH PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION CITY OF TIGARD T BANK OF PORTLAND SITE PLAN N (SDR)1999-00026) (Map is not to scale) 1 c _ ...r � 4667 CITY of TIGARD ■m II! — r l:. C. OAK' T G1 OGA.e r .nau.. oN SYSTEM VICINITY MAP ST IIIIIIIMP I L —J Q��F�i�ti , . uI- I �i �� r SDR1999-00026 ST T S - _ BANK OF PORTLAND J l 1 i op 4UCE III FIN • 110 / SUBJECT al A 7 7. = . 11.01 SITE ___ , N. kli.. IV III Ill ■ 41 . W im Q . I VI • / W N Z0 200 400 600 Feet 1"=476 feet I i :.� J A ST — : =. City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and ST should be verified wRh the Development Services Division W ■, ,. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 Q (503)639-4171 .` J hllp//vnwr.ei tipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:May 24,2000;C:lmagic\MAGICO3APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00026 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development BANK OF PORTLAND Shaping.ABetterCommunity 120 DAYS =7/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: BANK OF PORTLAND CASE NO. Site Development Review SDR1999-00026 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval for new construction of a 3,529 square foot two-story office building. APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Leer, General Contractor Attn: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman 5210 SE 26 Avenue P.O. Box 847 Portland, Oregon 97205 Portland, Oregon 97308 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General-Commercial District; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G; General-Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, min-warehouse, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 6505. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: 4 THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 24, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment eriod. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 8, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Peri Fox at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .t° EASEMENT FROM HOTEL \!ill►\1►�t E1 #,oraseo;'. R�� eul�olNq ��►Cr�:. Ada.......,... �° °� ' 1. ®I` { "mac____ 'SW 69Th AVENUE IS NOW SW 68m PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION CITY OF TIGARD t BANK OF PORTLAND SITE PLAN N (SDR)1999-00026) (Map Is not to scale) = .�. N1r I ii i-° I_ _j .- -_I I - . VICINITY MAP F 4 71 I I - lint: G 11116 �‘% SDR1999-00026 L �7„ n,`1� / ' BANK OF PORTLAND ohl rri-T IN IP ill SUBJECT --Ili wo , SITE i / N = . I: C N y 1 oC 01 i w N I! ,..„... I {7 l'-yI�MQIIA — (9/i•a( Ciry 1 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIE )LDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIFttS THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE FKOMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 21, 2000 FILE NO./NAME: (SDR)1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND PROPOSAL: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of S.W. 69`h Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620,18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 4, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Pen Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. SDR1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND Failure of any party to addres e relevant approval criteria with s cient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD-CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." i °23-81 _.... - u F.43„, }}}• if 7 g QPG r .., li '. 1+ / • `•''' 'Li,J � w 7 ry [ S N = ,^/. 0 A Y y '5s L E E m z—,.nr on wnrmc F2 Eo V«=.47c...Tx.or s 4_ SDR1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND 'SW 69'"AVENUE IS NOW SW 68'"PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 1999-00026, Bank of Portland Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080(A) of the TDC, Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requires a minor arterial street to have a 70-foot right-of-way width and 46-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, which is classified as a minor arterial in the TTDS. At present, this street is improved with adequate pavement width and curbing, but lacks street trees behind the existing sidewalk. The applicant should plant street trees per TDC standards. The applicant is also proposing to install a new concrete driveway to serve the new building. A street opening permit is required for any work in the public ROW. The most current tax assessor's map indicates that there is less than 35 feet of ROW east of the roadway centerline. Therefore, additional ROW is necessary ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 1 from this site. The applicant must dedicate the additional ROW prior to issuance of a building permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. At present, there is a concrete sidewalk along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway. No other sidewalk improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site from SW 68th Parkway. The applicant is proposing to relocate a portion of this sewer line so that the new building can be properly located. Staff does not oppose the relocation, but the work will need to be covered by a public improvement permit from the City Engineer. Prior to construction, the plans for the sewer line work must be approved by the City Engineer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 2 Based upon the applicant's onsite storm drainage plan, it appears that any upstream runoff will be adequately accommodated. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide onsite detention partially within their parking area and partially in a new pond structure to the east of their parking area. Staff reviewed the engineer's preliminary calculations and finds that the surface detention and the proposed pond will provide adequate detention volume to handle the additional runoff. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. 99729'''? Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 3 Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines in front of this site. All new utilities into this development must be placed underground. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 4 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides the public water in this area. The applicant must coordinate with TVWD with regard to the proposed water service for the building. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate they will treat their stormwater in an onsite water quality pond. The preliminary sizing calculations reviewed by Staff indicate that the proposed pond will sufficiently handle the additional runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 5 USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan must be provided to the Building Division as a part of the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 6 name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 68th Parkway as a part of this project: A. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per Tigard Triangle Design Standards; B. driveway apron. The applicant's construction plans shall include the proposed relocation of the existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 7 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \\tig333\usr\depts\eng\brian r\comments\sdr\sdr1999-00026.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland PAGE 8 4, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TI/GARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 TO: Nadine Smith,Advanced Planning Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)1999-00026 BANK OF PORTLAND: REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69t Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: r tery, �,c g pi_ /r e wr ar�,c:� Z4- ' 1-0 V P► (Tease provide the forrowing information)Name of Perseids)Commenting: I Phone Number[sl: -- I SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00026 >BANN OF PORTLAND< REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69'n Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: E� Adk6 _ 3 f♦2z- p a v (Tease provide the forrowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: N � I I Phone Number[sl: SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • Page l of l SDR 1999-00026 Comments: 1. The accessible route in front of the accessible parking space shall have a minimum width of 68 inches. The required width is 36 inches plus 32 inches for the vehicle overhang over the curb. 2. The fire department access route passing through the easement is impeded by the accessible parking stall and the island, and doesn't meet the required radius. Further, when they finalize this route, they will be required to treat that portion where this route crosses the accessible route as a marked crossing. Bob Poskin file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00001.HTM 3/24/00 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT'Yo TIGARD Community(Vevetopment Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISOR)1999-00026 ➢BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69tn Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1 S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicants Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (2leaae provide the foffowing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: Ay\ \A a`f- Phone Number(s): hti1�� SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4,0„, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITTYY�OF TIIGARD Community Devetopment ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 21,200.0 H f TO: 1.!fin Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)1999-00026 >BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69tn Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: i' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the folTowi ng information)Name of Person's]Commenting: I Phone Numher(sl: SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS „AA' CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING Gl Michael Miller,Utilities Manager APR 1 3 2000 more < City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: 15031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 1999-00026 BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69'n Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: rsroir of oLta_ /vAre-4 _) U/[c- AtEi-. A( (PCease provide the folTowing information)Name of Personlsl Commenting: I Phone Numberlsl: SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 03/22/00 WED 13: 13 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING 0 002 yh^Y i REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community HATE: March 21,2000 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Pert Fox,Associate Planner --- Phone: [5031 639-4111 I Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)1999-00026 >BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69t Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other i ation—a ailable to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered 9 he`proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you 8 unable to respond by-he above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your co■hments inwwvriting'as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK-THE FOLLOWING ITEMS1I A A ^LY: r� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Pare provide Meloil-o wg inf,matio„)Name of Person(sl Commenting: -° __ (Phone Numbertsl: �V � 3b2,_ ,,, I APR-03-00 MON 03:51 PM SIWA FAX:503 621 3025 PAGE 1 Date Pc.Po.. . Fax Note 7671 / pages To From .C?(Z 1f;'Q4 rj/{t. Co./Dept. Co CITY OF TIGARD Phone e phone# Z _ 3 zisig Community(Der e(opment Fax s FAx SfapingA BettcrCommunity DATE: March 21 TO: Oregon Department of Fish a Wildlife FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: 1503)639-4171 I Fax: (5031 684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SUB)1999-00026 >BANK OF PORTLAND< REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69t Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68m Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, , 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUBSOMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. ifyou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECKTHETRIOWIND1TEMS11111 APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided"below: y Az1)2..--) t ` tff —Ja. Please pmoi.�c thcfoQounrrg irsformation)Name of Person(sl Commenting: 4/7 gign I Phone Numberlsl: Cz/- 3e1 - �` APR-03-00 MN 03:51 PM SIWA FAX:503 621 3025 PAGE 2 Review of Application: City of Tigard: SDR 1999-00026 Review Date: April 3, 2000 Reviewed by: ODFW, Jim Grimes (503) 621-3488 Applicant: Bank of Portland 1 . The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife appreciates the opportunity to participate in your review process. A site review was completed during April, 2000 . Based on our observations our comments focus on stormwater treatment and enhancement of the riparian habitat . Stormwater 2 . The application indicates that detention will be provided but no bio-treatment of the water is proposed. since the stormwater run-off discharges to a natural waterway, the Oregon department of fish and Wildlife recommend that bio-treatment of the stormwater prior to discharging off-site. A designed based upon the treatment standards outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency' s Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary_Sewer and Surface Water Management can modify the existing ditch into a bio- treatment pond or swale. 3. The trees removed for site preparation can be used to diversify the habitat around the stormwater treatment facility. The removal method should allow the rootwads to remain attached to the trunk. ODFW is available to provide technical assistance for the placement of woody debris. Riparian Plantings 4 . The eastern end of the property is currently dominated by non-native blackberries. This part of the site also includes parts of two drainageways. We strongly encourage the applicant to restore native vegetation on this part of the site to restore riparian functions (fish and wildlife habitat, water quality, flood storage) to benefit fish and wildlife resources. ODFW is willing to partner with the applicant and other interested groups to replant the area. End of Review I� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division !? 4 2 IBy STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]1999-00026 r BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69` Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease pravtfe the foffowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting:- ,; _ l �o 1 cyc, I Phone Number(s): _ ?I"a` SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS .. f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA L- SUBJECT: Bank of Portland, SDR 1999-00026 On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists in the vicinity of the site. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 s2,....,...- . __ \ '' • \ N I 1 1 : V1-4-11.11-7 . 4111711 VA6 . _ /ow 11 A , 4 - fi lir 1 . . - -. b. groftler II 4 4hinv I/ 116. . ,,, .iw-,.„\.„-\- \ 0 / ' illibi Wv411r4A1rAllid 111 ■L 7 I ; ._.1:;., Niiiiiiii4 .„ AV 11 ..,N , _,,,,,, \ i it; •• 1.!'4',': ‘ \ ,.. .:.:.., N . 4.. . . . .■■■■■• t...r.,,,„ . ( \\\\ *a ''.: '''. . ( -.'.... ' - - - '' iliri4 \- i& Oji \ `..id I E. .. _.. . . . Isi lia,E9 Amy viio ' N -422 iiall Emme so .1 ..„ i 1.11 .. 14 til • ...../ ric A 1 ' lilt E-7!--,j- \ • r . 116 , :' ' _ ) • ' -, - ' N 1111101MEJ 111111117"11.11...1011111 -4.4.01----• 111OU r. -■1 . lkij Lim A ii, ,, , ,,,,,,,r1 ' ...,,,,,,..„,--4..„ ..... -. 011111r11111 AR,/amillIgnMW04...M.JIWORIMMIMPI,11“0,-..N4 HIl.“11.. Ir *i r, t, \ \ ........, .,....„„,„, „,,. . , , '.' '': ' ' ' '' ' \\ ‘.------------ \\\\N\t hi -,,1, 1) 11111114v 7 1 , A M L A,., ."A d. .. 1 Ira ..,.., moil rafallallp !liki, H 'Lk° 61-ars _ . .., / , ••I Bowe \ . \ N 'Ii On I RIM OM laillin— • \Z \ . s'. „ .... \- all. bla ."17711 W -■I ' V 1111 111111L , " \N. ''"-- '\_ ■ - top! 111 ,,l,• ,r. • IL,1 , ,73..,, .. . ,, EN , _ _ MI'k h...._ III Ill .4I MI 111 41.- I iliii4;. ' P.:,=:-i'.i.2- . r / .. . . , /1 pi ,a L - A . . / .. ,, :. '" iii .. . . ,.. . . . . 111111A IllUlla -"' . \. : . ... . ,, 4, . \-, \ ---- - - / MIIIIII / rt ,---<' ' ' ' ' H ‘, ... • \ \ \\ =1i ; ,...., still: z - ,- r , • ____ ,, ,„ . , ....,-. i 1 \ \ 11.I Wibilli - .•,.., \---7 7-7----r' --•'-'' ..:\ \\\\-. •-•" -:...:. :...4.r..:41' !v,I1Tri Hig111117..441 , . 2: .. :.:: ;T IIIII 4 , ,../ .,,,., 1 .,,,,....„bi\-•,,, , ,.,.L. I 4 , 't:,,• ;,), N., ---6 -____ . - MI ,. 4. , ---.., , AO . : A AN-T . ' ,,,,, . _.....-- . i a ........ , 4111 - ' dll • . „.\\ \ '7. ::: --,,,,...„L ii , , ' --,, _.„„., , Mar-23-00 09 : 1OA TCI St _ Helens 503 397 5686 P _ 01 IC ' FAX COVER SHEET DATE : 3 : TIME : TO: , / .f Y i 1 CC-1 -f Lf- S T a C • r � . FROM. .. ., �7 ` • L lc > ( / 7 � i e , wLP : -���t `�-YU ��1�� � �; byge A J G. r (, 1b1_!-- >r:xy,cEs 14200 S .W. BRIGADOON CT. BEAVERTON , OREGON 97005 PHONE: ( 503) 605-4895 FAX: ( 503) 646-8004 • NUMBER OF PAGES IN THIS TRANSMISSION INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: • NOTES : TCI ct Tualatin Wiley.Inc. 14200 S.W.Bnga000n Cok.rt Beaverton,OA 97005 (503)605-4895 FAX(503)646-8004 An Egval OVUM:nly Enploy,er Mar-23-00 09: 1OA TCI St. _ Helens 503 397 5686 P .02 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD ('omraurril y,D.^re(rpmeut ,Sfiaping,?Wetter Community GATE: March 21,2000 TO: Pat McCann Tel Cablevision of Oregon FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: (5031639-41711 Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SUR)1999-00026 ,--BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69t Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18/80, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. Ifyou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the/ofrcczng iufomratton'Name of Person(s)Commenting( c , Tt Jr A Phone Numbertsl: (-. C _ I SDR1999-000226,BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS „ a. TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAR 2 4 2000 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SORT 1999-00026 >BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 691 Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1 S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (llease provide the foarwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: ■KA7of2� I Phone Number(s): SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TY OF 'I CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: March 21,2000 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR11999-00026 >BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of SW. 69t Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. Attached is the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: APRIL 4,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the One date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v ►� (4'Cease provide the foffinving information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: SDR1999-000226/BANK OF PORTLAND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITF TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO' 'ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMLn 1 APPLICATIONS CITArea:WI [El [S1 [WI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ID Place tor review in Library CFTBook(s)• FILE NMI: ._,0G._. 061°L 000),L, FILE RAME(S]: h NJL /4- Q.} I c, CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,supen,a« COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./D.4 i sw Taohocun: *POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime PreveMnn officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Bum,yoecmr - ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,D..pennt Revaw6pW WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,ut+,ti,Ma, , _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,Gay Become _OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,PropertyUanaga _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* -TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _-UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * \OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE { OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _ Irish Bunnell,Devebvmentser'.ces PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE CITY OF DURHAM 1M 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 X_, US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,GreenspacesCoordinatOr(CPA/ZOA) Larry French PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Reggnai Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powenines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Punning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Scott King(CPA) N. OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT, REGION 1 * Mike Borreson(Ervriee) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands ar vi Potential Environmental Impacts) '\Sonya Kazen,Devebpment Review Coordinator _Jim Tice(IGA) David Knowles,Punning Bureau Dir, Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vawtinns) Tom Harry(General Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Forth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Phil Healy(GeneratApps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Sr.Cartographer(cervzcoltasr. Portland,OR 97204 Jim Nims RCA)Ms 15 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 Jane Estes,Penn+sr>eoarst 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 ...,: _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGONTRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(An neea nos��y) Pat McGann (it Proe t¢Wrthm%Mde of A Trance Ro e) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Y Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE ,US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: 0RO3O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps Eof Haim of99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Menlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPliANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Proru Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h.'pattytmasters\Requesl For Comments Notification List.doc (Revised: 2-Nov-99) MAILING RECORDS e ♦ A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY or 1 nowRo Community Development ,Shaping Better Community STAr1&&of o ECON ) County off Washington )ss. City of�figare ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: ( ied,Appropriate Box(s)Beiew) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director El NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDRI999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Dale of Public Hearing) • City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:. ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (i ype.K1nti of Notice) FOR: I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing.if applicable) A copy-of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Ex ibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B" on Ma 24 2000 and •:?• i in the nited States Mail on May 24,2000, postage prepaid. alp (Person t►.t Pr- d N• e) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befo me on the /9 day of 14- �y , 2000. OFFICIAL.SEALu� 4'.:; z SHERMAN S. CASPER JeOFORá' Y l NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MY COMMISSION COMMISSR3N NO. 3409 3 My Commission Expires: )14, /3, 2040 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1999-00026 CITY OF TIOARD Community(Dew Copment BANK OF PORTLAND ShapingA Better Community 120 DAYS =7/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: BANK OF PORTLAND CASE NO. Site Development Review SDR1999-00026 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval for new construction of a 3,529 square foot two-story office building. APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Lees, General Contractor Attn: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman 5210 SE 26 Avenue P.O. Box 847 Portland, Oregon 97205 Portland, Oregon 97308 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General-Commercial District; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G; General-Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, min-warehouse, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S136AD, Tax Lot 6505. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 1 OF 34 ti CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE AND BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $30.00. 4. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW 68t Parkway as a part of this project: A. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per Tigard Triangle Design Standards; B. driveway apron. 5. The applicant's construction plans shall include the proposed relocation of the existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 6. The applicant shall rovide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 7. The applicant shall revise the plans and increase the width of the building along SW 68th Parkway to a minimum of 50% of the frontage or approximately 39 feet. 8. The applicant shall revise the plans and locate the building within 0 to 10 feet from the 68th Parkway frontage. The maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. 9. The applicant shall revise the plans and provide landscaping, an arcade, or a hard surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path along 68 Parkway between the structure (building) and the street. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard along the public street. 10. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate paving materials as scored concrete or modular paving materials on the walkway system between the building entrance and the public street in accordance with Section 18.620.030.4 of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 2 OF 34 11 . The applicant shall revise the landscape plan in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.030.5 and Section 18.745.050. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60-foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Shrubs shall not exceed three feet in height in accordance with Diagram 2 of Section 18.620.030. The acer circinatum (vine maple) shall be placed no greater than 15 feet apart, with no gaps along the north, east, or south parking lot edge, or the applicant may propose another tree type and demonstrate how it will meet the tree spacing standard. For any tree proposed, the applicant shall provide a standard acceptable landscape tree classification reference or determination by a landscape architect that the proposed tree is adequately spaced for mature growth, meets the spacing standard in the TDC and is appropriate for the climate. The applicant shall indicate the branching width at maturity of the pinus nigra from a standard landscape reference source, or landscape architect. 12. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate clearly all proposed exterior finish materials for review and approval in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.040.4. 13. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate the specific roof material for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.5 (18.620.040.5). 14. The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate where roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be located and how it will be screened from the adjacent public street for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.6 (18.620.040.6). 15. The applicant shall submit a separate application for a sign permit for the free-standing sign, and shall re-locate the sign for review and approval in conjunction with TDC Chapter 18.620 and Chapter 18.780, Signs. 16. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. 17. The applicant shall address all the standards from the TDC but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765 to demonstrate compliance with Section 18.705.030.C., Joint Access. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the City Engineer in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access use or to update existing joint access agreements considering any changes to the accesses as a result of this development and must be recorded with Washington County and placed on permanent file with the City. 18. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and add walkways to provide connectivity between the building entry and the public street sidewalk in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. 19. In order to satisfy the requirements of the TDC Section 18.705.030.1, the applicant shall provide evidence of the following: 1) that fire and safety requirements can be met, 2) the access will be marked with a one-way only permanent sign, 3) the egress will be marked with a no access sign, 4) all provisions of Section 18.705.030.J are met, and 5) that all provisions and conditions under Section 18.705.030.0 of this decision are met. 20. The applicant shall provide plans that show the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site, and the access width and pavement width of the proposed egress. 21 . The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and specifications and provide sufficient detail to determine that the buffer to the south of the site is adequate to meet the standards of Section 18.745.050 including fence height, buffer width, tree spacing and density of shrub planting. The buffer width (with a six (6) foot high fence) is fifteen (15) feet where the site abuts a residential use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 3 OF 34 • 22. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and provide a minimum 2 and 1/z inch caliper tree in the landscape island in the parking lot along with tree classification data (size, height and climate) for review and approval. 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan and clearly indicate the location, size, and screening of the trash enclosure(s) in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non- residential buildings, or 25 square feet of storage area based on the building's size of 3,529 square feet. 24. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. 25. The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. 26. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 27. The applicant shall provide lighting for the walkway, or provide evidence that the building will not be used during night-time hours. The lighting plan shall indicate proposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (if any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property, as well as, all locations and types of building and parking lot lighting. 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans to include two (2) bicycle parking spaces in accordance with the design standards in CDC Section 18.765.050. 29. The applicant shall have a certified arborist revise the tree plan to include the following: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Protective four (4') foot high orange construction fencing shall be placed around all trees to be preserved prior to the issuance of a site permit, and shall be maintained until final building inspection. 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and provide dimensions for the van accessible parking space. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 31. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 32. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 4 OF 34 Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 34. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 35. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 36. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency desicn and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for fie design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 37. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 38. A sign shall be posted for each accessible parking space. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible' mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PROVISIONS; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: All sign changes and additions (except where specifically identified in this decision) the shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780. Section 18.725.020 requires compliance with applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. All future tenants shall be in compliance with the Environmental Performance Standard as set forth in federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations, and compliance is a continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site was developed as a continuation of SW 69th Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of-way and was later abandoned. Prior property line adjustments were approved on this site under Case file Nos. MIS 1999-00022 and MIS 1999-00023. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 5 OF 34 Vicinity Information: The site is located east of SW 68th Parkway and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5. The property is located to thq,south of and in close proximity of 99W, but does not front 99W. To the west of the subjJect site is 68 Parkway and pproperty zoned General Commercial which is in commercial use (Newport Bay Restaurant) to west of 68t Parkway. To the northwest of the subject site is property zoned General Commercial which is in commercial use (Carrows Restaurant). To the north of the subject site is property zoned property General Commercial which is in commercial use (Carrows Restaurant). To the east of the subject site is property zoned General Commercial and heavily treed at the portion of the property which abuts the Bank of Portland site; and the property to the east is the Portland General Electric power station. To the southeast of the site is property zoned Mixed Use Employment which is heavily treed adjacent to the subject site. To the southwest of the site is property zoned General Commercial, and in residential use. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposed site is a narrow rectangular lot approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres). This project is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot, two-story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The building is proposed to be located along the northern property line and aththe west end of the lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68` Parkway Icy a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68 Parkway. Due to the site location within the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The proposed building design takes advantage of the diagonal frontage by employing a saw-tooth design concept along the frontage for visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located on the eastern portion of the building. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct new offices for a commercial lending bank. This use is classified in Community Development Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Office. The site is located within the General-Commercial District. Table 18.520.1 lists Office as a permitted use in the C-G zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Oricer. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No neighborhood comments were submitted. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 6 OF 34 A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Community Plan Standards 18.620 (Tigard Triangle Design Standards) C. S•ecific Develo•ment Standards . I access, gress : ircu ation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscapinc and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid-Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) D. Land Use Decisions 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) 18.390 (Im act Study Section 18.390.040) E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the rovisions of Code Chapters:18.715 (Density Computations), 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 Sensitive Lands), 18.785 Temporary Uses 18.797 (Water Resources Overlay District), 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General-Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: EXCERPT FROM C-G STANDARDS FROM TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Minimum Lot Size None - Detached unit - - Boarding, lodging, rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft [6] - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] - - Side yard 0/20 ft [3] - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - Rear yard 0/20 ft [3] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting - a public or private street. Maximum Height 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. The net site area is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres). According to the applicant, there is approximately 4,256 square feet (.10 acres) of abandoned improvements along with the existing storm sewer. The two-story office building is 3,529 square feet with a total footprint of 2,699 square feet. The second story is 830 square feet. The total proposed building coverage equals 12.16% of the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 7 OF 34 The total proposed landscaping is 47% of the site, which exceeds the minimum 15% requirement; this is due largely to the fact that the eastern portion of the site will not be developed (approximately 143 linear feet, and 8,071 square feet undeveloped). The total building and impervious surface coverage is 53% of the site, which is considerably less than the maximum site coverage of 85%. The proposed minimum lot width is 56.44 feet which meets the minimum lot width requirement of 50 feet. The maximum building height measured from the midpoint of the main hipped roof on the second story of the building is approximately 26.5 feet which is well below the 45-foot maximum height requirement. Minimum building setbacks are 0 feet on all sides, as the property does not abut a residential zoning district (there is residential use, however, it is zoned C-G southwest of the site). The building is located at the northwestern corner of the site along the northern property line, therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: The proposed building and site design meets the standards for minimum lot width, minimum setbacks, maximum height requirement, maximum site coverage, and minimum landscape coverage. Therefore, this standard is met. B. COMMUNITY PLAN AREA STANDARDS TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.620 Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. Street Connectivity: Section 18.620.020 All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met (either the Design Option or the Performance Option). Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.370.010 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option A. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. B. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. The Performance Option has been selected over the Design Option, in this case, as street connections can not meet the Design Option criteria for street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet and bike and pedestrian connections at no more than 330 feet. Performance Option A. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile. The local street spacing for 68th Parkway which adjoins 69th Avenue to the south, is addressed in the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 8 OF 34 Tigard Street Plan. The length of this street is approximately 6,000 linear feet, which would require 9 intersections. There are seven existing intersections and two planned intersections, therefore, this standard is met. B. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector, or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance standard, has been interpreted as the distance from a driveway entrance to a collector or larger classification street. In this case, the project meets this standard because the only driveway entrance is located right at 68t Avenue, a Minor Arterial in the TTDS and a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map. C. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The shortest pedestrian trip standard has been interpreted to mean that a pedestrian should not have to travel more than one and one-half (1 and Y2) the shortest straight line distance from the driveway entrance to the farthest building entrance. As the distance from the driveway entrance to the only building entrance at the southeast corner of the building is one straight line distance, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard is met. Site Design Standards: Section 18.620.030 All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials - Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Thg site fronts 68th Parkway is classified as a Minor Arterial in the Tigard Triangle Design District. 68t Parkway is the only street which abuts the site. The proposed new building occupies 37.5 feet of the 78.5-foot frontage. As 50% of the frontage is approximately 39 feet, the standard is not met. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and increase the width of the building along SW 68th Parkway to a minimum of 50% of the frontage or approximately 39 feet. Building setback - The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The building is setback approximately fifteen feet (15`) from the public street right-of-way (after ROW dedication) at 68`h Parkway at the southwestern corner of the building, and approximately nineteen feet (19') from the northwestern corner of the site. FINDING: This criterion is not met, as the building's front setback is greater than 10 feet from the public street right-of-way. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:Thg applicant shall revise the plans and locate the building within 0 to 10 feet from the 68t Parkway frontage. The maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. Front yard setback design - Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 9 OF 34 streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. The applicant's landscape plan indicates some low level landscaping and street trees between the structure and the public street. The building only abuts one street, 68th The applicant has indicated two street trees (ars-davidii), spaced 25 feet apart, and some shrubs in front of the southwest corner of the building. No information was provided by the applicant to substantiate the tree size or classification. The proposed landscaping does not cover the entire landscaping area between the building and the public street to meet the L-1 standard. The existing sidewalk indicated on the plans is 8 feet wide, which is the standard width for a public sidewalk. FINDING: This standard is not met, as the proposed landscaping does not meet the L-1 standard nor does the sidewalk proposed meet the standard for an expansion of the pedestrian path. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and provide landscaping, an arcade, or a hard surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path along 68`" Parkway between the structure (building) and the street. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard along the public street. Walkway connection to building entrances - A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. The applicant's plans appear to indicate a six-foot (6') wide walkway from the building entrance at the southeast corner of the building, along the south side of the building and connecting to the existing public sidewalk at 68 Parkway. No paving materials are indicated on the applicant's plans. FINDING: The walkway system does not meet this standard as no paving materials are indicated on the plans. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate paving materials as scored concrete or modular paving materials on the walkway system between the building entrance and the public street in accordance with Section 18.620.030.4 of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. Parking, location and landscape design - Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. See Diagram 2. Parking is located to the rear of the building accessed via the access drive off of 68th Parkway. The interior side and rear yards are required to be landscaped to a L-2 standard which requires trees at a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Along the north side yard (along the parking lot), new 2-inch caliper vine maple trees (acer circinatum) are shown on the landscape plan as approximately 18 feet on center. Along the rear (east) of the proposed developed portion of the site and parking rot, new 2-inch caliper vine maple trees are proposed and shown as no greater than 28 feet on center . The acer circinatum is described in the Sunset Western Garden Book, Sunset Publishing Company Fifth Edition, 1988, Menlo Park, California as follows: Deciduous shrub or small trees. Zones 1-6, 14-17 (Portland, Oregon is in climate Zone 6 as indicated on p. 36 of the Sunset Garden Book). Crooked, sprawling, and-vine-like in the forest shade, with many stems from the base; single-trunked small tree 5-35 feet high in full sun. Loses its vine-like characteristics in open situations." According to Section 18.745.050.B.4, the acer circinatum would be classified as a small or narrow-stature tree, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at maturity, and shall be spaced no greater than 15 feet apart. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 10 OF 34 For a portion of the south side yard along the parking lot, existing cedar trees are indicated on the plan approximately 4 feet on center; and at the southeast corner of the site two-inch (2") caliper (pinus nigra) trees are indicated approximately eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet on center. The pinus nigra, or Austrian Black Pine, is described in the Sunset Western Garden Book as "slow to moderate growth, usually not above 40 feet in gardens. Tree of strong character which will serve either as landscape decoration or as windbreak in cold regions." As the applicant did not provide any information regarding the width of branching at maturity, the tree classification for spacing standards cannot be determined at this time. There are some gaps in the parking lot landscape screening on the south side yard for about 60 feet. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60-foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.030.5 and Section 18.745.050. All new trees must be increased in size to a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inches caliper, and trees shall be planted in the approximate 60- foot gap along the edge of the parking lot at the south side yard. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Shrubs shall not exceed three feet in height in accordance with Diagram 2 of Section 18.620.030. The acer circinatum (vine maple) shall be placed no greater than 15 feet apart, with no gaps along the north, east, or south parking lot ed e, or the applicant may propose another tree type and demonstrate how it will meet the tree spacing standard. For any tree proposed, the applicant shall provide a standard acceptable landscape tree classification reference or determination by a landscape architect that the proposed tree is adequately spaced for mature rowth, meets the spacing standard in the TDC and is appropriate for the climate. The applicant shall indicate the branching width at maturity of the pinus nigra from a standard landscape reference source, or landscape architect. Building Design Standards: Section 18.620.40 (18.620.040) All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Ground floor windows - All street-facing. elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three L3) feet above grade to nine (9)_feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. This criteria is applicable to the west elevation, which faces the street. The west elevation has approximately 225 square feet of ground floor wall area between three and nine feet in height, therefore, 112.5 square feet of wall area is required to be ground floor windows, display areas, or doorway openings. The applicant's west elevation indicates approximately 117 square feet of ground floor windows. FINDING: This standard is met as an adequate amount of ground floor windows are shown on the applicant's west elevation to meet the 50% ground floor window standard. Building facades - Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building.off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or throug-h the building. The east and west elevations are 37.5 feet in width and are varied via building wall variation/off-set. Therefore, these facades do not extend more than 50 feet without a variation as required. The east elevation has a saw-tooth style profile on the façade, and the west elevation is broken by an inset building entry. The hipped roof-lines of the first and second story multiple masses that make up the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 11 OF 34 building add variation to the building form. The south elevation is approximately 74 feet in length and is cut back to approximately 53 feet in mass at the southern-most portion of the façade by the inset building entrance on the southeast corner and the saw-tooth cut design on the southwest corner. There is a concrete column at the southeast corner of the building entry. The second story of the south elevation is set back and broken down into two masses with hipped roofs to meet the building off-set standard. An additional design feature is recommended along the south and north elevation. The north elevation is similar to the south elevation, except that there is an 82-foot of length on the ground floor facade. However, the second floor massing creates a building off-set so that there is no more than 50 feet without a façade variation as required under this standard. Building material is brick veneer on all of the facades. FINDING: This standard is met. Weather protection - Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. FINDING: This criteria is met, as the applicant has indicated in the plans and elevations, weather protection for pedestrians at the building entrance. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. Proposed exterior finish material for the ground floor facade walls is brick veneer. According to the applicant's narrative, the second story fa ade will be horizontal lap siding. Elevations indicate an approximate six-inch (6") reveal of concrete at the foundation. No prohibited materials are indicated on the plans and elevations. FINDING: No prohibited materials are proposed, however, plans do not indicate the second story facade material. Therefore, in order to meet the criterion, the applicant shall meet the fofowing condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate clearly all proposed exterior finish materials for review and approval in accordance with TDC Section 18.620.040.4. Roofs and roof lines - Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The applicant has proposed multiple hipped roofs over the building masses, and has not indicated clearly the roof material in the plans or elevations. The applicant's narrative does state the roofing materials will be "an architectural composition". The applicant has not proposed to use false fronts or false roofs as part of the building elevations. FINDING: This criterion is not met, as the specific type of roof materials is not indicated on the plans or elevations. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate the specific roof material for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.5 (18.620.040.5). Roof-mounted equipment - All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 12 OF 34 The applicant has not adequately addressed how it will screen roof-mounted equipment. The applicant's narrative does state that "roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be obscured from view". FINDING: This criterion is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the plans and elevations and indicate where roof-mounted equipment (if any) will be located and how it will be screened from the adjacent public street for review and approval in accordance with Section 18.620.40.6 (18.620.040.6). Signs: Section 18.620.050 In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code the standards as contained in Section 18.620.050 shall be met. This is a non-residential development within the C-G zone and, therefore, shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.1300. One wall sign of 45 square feet is proposed on the north elevation. In accordance with Section 18.780.130C, wall signs shall not exceed, in gross area, 15 percent of any building face on which it is to be mounted. The square footage of the building face on which the sign is proposed to be mounted is 775 square feet, therefore, the sign is 6% of the building face on which it is mounted. One fifteen-foot (15') high free-standing sign is proposed with forty (40) square feet of signage per face. This sign meets the size and height standards for free-standing signs in the General Commercial zone as addressed under Chapter 18.780 in this decision, however, the sign will need to be re-located after the building setback is brought into conformance with the 0-10 foot building setback requirement of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, and a separate sign application is required. FINDING: The proposed wall sign meets this standard. The free-standing sign as it is proposed does not meet the standard due to its location between the building and the street as the building itself will need to be moved closer to the street to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards which required a building setback between 0-10 feet. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall submit a separate application for a sign permit for the free-standing sign, and shall re-locate the sign for review and approval in conjunction with TDC Chapter 18.620 and Chapter 18.780, Signs. Landscaping And Screening: Section 18.620.070 Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscapin or screening is defined within this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 Low Screen - For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots and along collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening , shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on Major and Minor Arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provided a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The building fronts 68th Parkway, which is a Minor Arterial in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The parking lot is setback approximately 80 to 97 feet from the public street and is accessed via an access driveway off of 68 h Parkway. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 13 OF 34 CONDITION: Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a Major or Minor Arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2-inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. As there is a visual clearance triangle of 30 feet on either side of the access, the applicant shall provide landscaping to the L-1 standard in this area modified where necessary to meet the clear vision requirements in Chapter 18.795. L-2 General Landscaping — For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum of 2 and 1/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. This standard is addressed under Section 18.745.040, Street Trees and portions of Chapter 18.745 in this decision. Street and Accessway Standards: Section 18.620.080 Refers to Table 18.620.1 and accessway diagrams in this section. This section is incorporated and addressed under Section 18.810, Street and Utility Improvement Standards in this decision. B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. The applicable TDC criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VI. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the Tigard Community Development Code: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Commercial and industrial uses which require 0-99 parking spaces shall provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 feet and minimum pavement width of 24 feet. Section 18.705.030.0 provides for joint access. Joint Access: Section 18.705.030.0 Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of and may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are places on permanent file with the City. Joint egress is proposed with the property erty to the northwest of the subject site. The applicant has not provided evidence that the combined and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in the TDC including but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 14 OF 34 • CONDITION:The applicant shall address all the standards from the TDC but not limited to Chapter 18.705 and Chapter 18.765 to demonstrate compliance with Section 18.705.030.C., Joint Access. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the City Engineer in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint access use or to update existing joint access agreements considering any changes to the accesses as a result of this development and must be recorded with Washington County and placed on permanent file with the City. Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Proposed concrete walkways measure a minimum of five feet in width on the site plan and extend along the north side of the parking lot to the building entry. It is not clear from the plans whether the walkway is proposed to connect with the public sidewalk. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; This criteria is not applicable as the property is in commercial use. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; There are no proposed walkways which cross vehicle access driveways on this site. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has not indicated the walkway material or proposed lighting (if any) for the walkway. The walkway material shall meet the Triangle Design Standards and is addressed elsewhere in this decision. FINDING: The proposed plan does not meet the standard. If the applicant meets the following conditions, the criteria will be met: CONDITIONS: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and add walkways to provide connectivity between the building entry and the public street sidewalk in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. The applicant shall revise the plans and provide lighting for the walkway, or provide evidence that the building will not be used during night-time hours. Minimum Access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 15 OF 34 TABLE 18.705.3 -VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Spaces MI irrmumNumber of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Driveways Required Width 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 50' 40' curbs required The development's frontage is along the SW 68th Parkway, a Minor Arterial under the Tigard Triangle Design District and a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Transportation Map. The applicant proposes to access the parking lot, located to the rear and east of the building, via a one-way drive with a 16-foot width. Egress from the parking lot is via an easement on the property to the north, currently the site of the Carrows Restaurant, and returning to SW 681h Parkway. Vehicular access is provided to this commercial use and is within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrance at the southeast corner of the building. The applicant proposes twelve (12) parking spaces for the project. As there are between 0-99 parking spaces required, the minimum number of driveways required is one (1). The minimum access width is 30 feet with a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. However, this is a one-way access only. Therefore, Section 18.705.030.J is applicable, and includes special provisions for one-way accesses. Provided that the fire and safety requirements can be met, the access is marked with a one way only permanent sign, and the egress is marked with a no access sign, this standard could be met. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. Therefore, if the applicant meets the following condition, this standard shall be satisfied: CONDITION: In order to satisfy the requirements of the Section 18.705.030.1, the applicant shall provide evidence of the following: 1) that fire and safety requirements can be met, 2) the access will be marked with a one-way only permanent sign, 3) the egress will be marked with a no access sign, 4) all provisions of Section 18.705.030.J are met, and 5) that all provisions and conditions under Section 18.705.030.0 of this decision are met. One-way vehicular access points; Section 18.705.030.J Where proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The applicant has proposed one-way traffic flow on the site. The entrance drive off of 68th Parkway is situated closest to oncoming traffic on this site, and the exit drive is situated farthest from oncoming traffic for the site as it is located on the site to the north. The applicant has not provided the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site. FINDING: This standard is not met as the applicant has not provided the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall provide plans that show the exact location of the exit, or egress on the lot to the north of the subject site, and the access width and pavement width of the proposed egress. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The applicant has included a statement in the narrative application that "there will no noise, visible emissions, vibration , odors, glare or heat from this project other than that normally anticipated from an office building. FINDING: This standard has been met. However, this is standard shall be maintained overtime therefore it is included in the general provisions of this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 16 OF 34 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 provides specific requirements for trees acing including: Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Subsection 2 which includes the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree, small, medium or large. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility policies to maintain visual clearance; Section 18.745.040.G, Granting of Adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020. C.4b There is approximately 78 feet of frontage along SW 68th Parkway. These standards are superseded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standards and are addressed under Section 18.620.030.5 and 18.620.070 in this decision. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). APPLICABLE SECTION OF BUFFER MATRIX TABLE 18.745.1 FOR C-G ZONE PROPOSED USE Commercial Zones EXISTING/ABUTTING USES (CC, CG, CP, CBD) Detached Single Units; Manufactured Units D Attached Single Units and Multifamily, D 1-5 Units, Duplexes Attached Single Units and Multifamily, D 5+ Units Mobile Home Parks D Commercial Zones (CC, CG, CP, CBD) -- Neighborhood Commercial Zone(CN) A Mixed Use Employment Zone (MUE) A Light Industrial Zones (IP, IL) A Heavy Industrial Zone (IH) D Parking Lots -- Arterial Streets -- Note: See Table 18.745.2 for alternative combinations for meeting these screening requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026—BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 17 OF 34 TABLE 18.74 BUFFER COMBINATIONS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING [1] Options Width (feet) Trees Shrubs or Groundcover Screening (per linear feet of buffer) A _ -- 10 -- Lawn/living -- -- 10 20'min/30'max spacing _ Lawn/living -- B groundcover _ C 1 10 _ Shrubs 4' hedges 2 8 15'min/30'max spacing Shrubs 5'fence 3 6 Shrubs 6'wall D 1 20 Shrubs 6' hedge 2 15 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'fence 3 10 Shrubs 6'wall E 1 30 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge or fence 2 _ 25 Shrubs 5'earthen berm or wall F — 40 10' min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'hedge,fence,wall or berm [1] Buffers are not required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street as specified in Section 18.745.050 A2. [2] Adjustments from these requirements can be obtained; see Section 18.370.020 C4. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. The subject site abuts a residential use to the southwest. The Buffer Matrix Table 18.745.1 as illustrated in Table 18.745.2 indicates that when a Commercial zone abuts a residential use, the required Buffer and Screening Standard is D. The applicant's plans indicate a site-obscuring fence along the south property line abutting the residential use. Therefore, Buffering and Screening combination standard D-2 is applicable along the south property line where re site abuts a residential use, and requires a buffer width of 15 feet with trees placed between 10-20 feet apart and shrubs planted to standard. The applicant's plans indicate a 10-foot buffer which is not adequate. Buffering and Screening are addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4) foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years of planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn round cover, or bark mulch, or 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has proposed a six-foot (6') high site-obscuring fence along the portion of the site to be developed along the south property line. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. FINDING: This Buffering and Screening standards are not met. However, the standards will be met if the following condition is met. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and specifications and provide sufficient detail to determine that the buffer to the south of the site is adequate to meet the standards of Section 18.745.050 including fence height buffer width, tree spacing and density of shrub planting. The buffer width (with a six (6) foot high fence) shall be fifteen (15) feet where the site abuts a residential use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 18 OF 34 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking. spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The parking lot screening standard is superceded by the Tigard Triangle Design Standard as contained in Section 18.620.030.5. The applicant's plans do not indicate additional parking lot trees beyond the trees proposed to screen the edges of the parking lot along the north and south property lines, and along the east edge of the parking lot. There is one landscape island proposed on the parking lot, and no trees is proposed to be planted in it, therefore, this standard is not met. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and provide a minimum 2 and 1/2 inch caliper tree in the landscape island in the parking lot and provide tree classification data (size, height and climate) for review and approval MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Minimum standards method, Section 18.755.040.C5.b (2) states that non-residential buildings shall provide shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus 10 square feet /1000 square feet of GFA. The applicant's narrative application states that "a refuse and recycling enclosure is provided at the east end of the parking lot", and that this enclosure will comply with the franchise hauler requirements. However, the size of the trash enclosure is not indicated on the plans or in the narrative. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non-residential buildings. The minimum storage requirement for this 3,529 square foot office building is, therefore, 25 square feet. The applicant has not indicated screening for the trash enclosure. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, if the applicant meets the conditions listed below, this standard will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan and clearly indicate the location, size, and screening of the trash enclosure(s) in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.755. The applicant shall demonstrate that it meets the requirements for minimum storage area of 10 square feet/1000 square feet of GFA plus 4 square feet/1,000 feet of gross floor for non-residential buildings, or 25 square feet of storage area based on the building's size of 3,529 square feet. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility in accordance with TDC Chapter 1-8.755. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 This Chapter is applicable for development projects when there is new construction, expansion of existing use, or change of use in accordance with Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 19 OF 34 General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; Unless otherwise specified Access, Egress and Circulation criteria are addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and The applicant has not specified the access drive material on the plans. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All parking spaces are served by a service drive, therefore, this standard is met. Pedestrian Access: Section 18.705.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This standard is addressed under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. In addition there are no known drop-off grade separations, therefore, this portion of the standard is not applicable. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off- street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. This is a commercial development, therefore, this standard is applicable and shall be met through striping of parking spaces, directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 20 OF 34 Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not indicated wheel stops on the site plan and/or landscaping plan in accordance with this criterion, therefore, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. No lighting plan was submitted by the applicant. Therefore, this standard is not met and the applicant shall submit a lighting plan indicating proposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (if any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. This standard is addressed under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, Section 18.620.050/ Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. From Figure 18.765.1 Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50%standard spaces, 50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. A A Parking Angle B Stall Width 13• C Stall Depth (no bumper overhang) E-{ • D Aisle Width Between Stall Lines (5) F o E Stall Width Parallel to Aisle F Module Width (no bumper overhang) t T G Bumper Overhang The applicant's plans do not indicate dimensions for parking spaces or aisle driveway width, as required, though it appears that the standard can be met. ATI standard 90 degree parking spaces shall be a minimum of 8'-5" wide by 18"-5" deep. All 90 degree compact parking spaces shall be a minimum of 7'-5" wide by 16'-6" deep. A minimum 24 feef is required for aisle width between 90 degree stalls for two-way traffic. Compact spaces shall not exceed the 50% maximum on the site. Compact spaces shall not exceed the 50% maximum on the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 21 OF 34 FINDING: The General Provisions for Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements has not been fully met. However, if the applicant meets the following conditions, the standard will be me : CONDITIONS: • All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. • All sign changes and additions (except as noted in this decision) shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. • The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the either asphalt or concrete surface for the access drive. • The applicant has not specified the parking space surfacing material. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate either asphalt or concrete surface for the parking area. • The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate wheel stops at all parking spaces along the perimeter of the site in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The wheel stops shall be located at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. • The applicant shall submit a lighting plan indicating roposed lighting in the parking area, and on the building (if any) arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential property. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The bicycle parking requirement for commercial office is .5/1000 square feet which is equivalent to two (2) bicycle spaces. The applicant has proposed in the narrative application to provide two (2) bicycle parking spaces near the front door, but has not shown them on the plans. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans to include two (2) bicycle parking spaces in accordance with the design standards in CDC Section 18.765.050. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The Director may reduce the total required off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070.H by up to a total of 20% by means of parking adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5a. The building is proposed for office use. The required minimum parking ratio is 2.7/1000 square feet of office building area. As the building is 3,529 square, a minimum of 10 parking spaces are required. The maximum parking ratio is 4.1/1000 or the equivalent of 15 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed 12 parking spaces including one van accessible parking space. FINDING: This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 Requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet. Each NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 22 OF 34 loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum the, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off- street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The building is 3,529 gross square feet which is less than the 10,000 gross square feet minimum requirement for a loading space. Therefore, no loading space is required. FINDING: This standard is met. SIGNS: CHAPTER 18.780 Zoning district Regulations: Section 18.780.130. Section 18.780.130.0 in the C-G and CBD zones. In the General Commercial zone one multi-faced, free-standing sign is permitted with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased one foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line, or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height. One fifteen-foot (15') high free-standing sign is proposed with forty (40) square feet of signage per face. This sign meets the size and height standards for free-standing signs in the General Commercial zone as addressed under Chapter 18.780 in this decision, however, the sign will need to be re-located after the building setback is brought into conformance with the 0-10 foot building setback requirement of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The applicant has proposed one wall sign and one free-standing sign. Signs are addressed in further detail under Section 18.620.050 in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the condition as listed under Section 18.620.050 in this decision. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a letter dated February 9, 2000 from Stephen J. Peacock, Certified Arborist regarding the applicant's tree removal plan. The applicant's tree plan does meet the requirements of Section 18.790.030, Tree Plan Requirement. Specifically, the plan is deficient in the following ways: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The plan only shows trees (12" or greater) to be removed rather than all existing tress (12" or greater). Other than stating that red tape has been placed on the trees to be removed, no protection program was provided by the applicant's arborist. According to the arborist, "the tree removal plan indicates that eleven (11) trees need to be removed in order for the building and parking lot to be built. Four (4) of the trees are less than twelve (12") inches in diameter. The land surveyor found that there are forty (40) trees with a diameter of twelve (12") inches or larger. Seven trees over twelve inches represents 17.5% of the total number of trees over twelve (12") inches identified on the site. This criteria is addressed further under the standards for Site Development Review as contained in Section 18.360.090.A.2 of this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 23 OF 34 FINDING: This standard is not met as the tree plan does not meet the requirements of Section 18.790.030. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall have a certified arborist revise the tree plan to include the following: 1) Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees, and 2) A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Protective four (4') foot high orange construction fencing shall be placed around all trees to be preserved prior to the issuance of a site permit, and shall be maintained until final building inspection. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The public street fronting the site is 68th Parkway which is a Major Collector on the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map and requires a 30-foot visual clearance triangle on both sides of the access. The applicant has shown 30-foot visual clearance triangles at each side of the access to the site on the site plan as required. The plans indicate that the required clear vision area will be provided. FINDING: This criterion is met. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standards under Section 18.360.090.A are not applicable to the subject proposal as they relate only to residential uses: 3. (Exterior Elevations), 5. (Privacy and Noise: multi-family or group living uses), 6. (Private Outdoor Areas: multi-family use), 7. (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: multi-family use). Also inapplicable is the following standard: 8. (100-year floodplain). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; The applicant has not identified all existing tree locations on the plans, but has identified existing trees to be removed on the plan. According to the applicant's arborist, "the tree removal plan indicates that eleven (11 ) trees need to be removed in order for the building and parking lot to be built. Four (4) of the trees are less than twelve (12") inches in diameter. This represents 17.5% of trees to be removed (trees 12" or greater). As more than 75% of the trees are to be retained on the site, the building (and parking lot) are located to preserve existing trees. The site slopes to the south from an elevation of approximately 300 feet along the northern property line to approximately 292 feet along the southern property line, or a slope of roughly 11 .4%. The building is located on the northwestern portion of the site with a slope of roughly 14%. The site drains to the east and southeast, and there is a drainageway or creek located at the far southeast end of the site which drains into Red Rock Creek. The building is sited close to the street and at the western end of the site to meet the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, Chapter 18.620 addressed in this decision. The building's location is away from the drainageway or creek, and is reasonably sited to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage of the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 24 OF 34 Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has stated in the narrative application that the building is located in an area not subject to ground slumping or sliding as the building is built on the improved portion of a vacated street. The applicant stated "this is prima-facie evidence movement has not occurred in recent years". Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and The building is located approximately 33 feet from the southern property line which abuts residential property. The Carrows Restaurant parking lot is located to the north of the subject building. Though the Bank of Portland building is located on the northern property line, it abuts the parking lot of the property to the north. Therefore, there is adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting. No other buildings are in close proximity to the proposed Bank of Portland building. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The building's entry is located at the southeast corner of the site, and is therefore, located away from southwesterly and northwesterly winds of the Pacific Northwest. The second story of the building is located on the eastern side of the building. Windows are relatively evenly distributed on all elevations, so that sunlight is evenly distributed throughout the building. The building is oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Section 18.360.090.A.2.b states that trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. This is standard is addressed under Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is met. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single- family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: • The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. A buffer is required along the south property line where the developed portion of the site abuts a residential use as addressed in further detail in this decision under Section 18.745.050. The purpose of the buffer is to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, and to rovide a visual barrier. The size of the buffer required with a six-foot (6') fence and shrubs is fifteen feet (15'). No other buffer is required as all other abutting uses are either also in commercial use or do not require a buffer. This standard is addressed further under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. FINDING: The buffer standard is not met, as the applicant has not provided adequate buffer width on the plans. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the condition for buffering as listed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 25 OF 34 Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and Whether the screening needs to be year around. The applicant has proposed screening with a six-foot (6') high site-obscuring fence along the portion of the site to be devQlopped (to the southeast corner of the parking lot), except in the area of visual clearance along 68 Parkway. The applicant has not proposed rooftop screening. Screening is also addressed under Section 18.745.050 and Section 18.620.070 in this decision. FINDING: This criterion has not been fully met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet then conditions as listed under Section 18.745.050 and Section 18.620.070 in this decision. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. As the building fronts the streets it defines the public space at the street. As the parking is located behind the building, the semi-public parking lot space is defined by the building and reinforced by the fence to the south. There is no proposed private space as part of this development site. FINDING: This standard is met, as public and semi-public space is clearly defined, and there is no private space. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes shall be located to prevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The windows are located relatively evenly on all building elevations. No exterior lighting plan was provided by the applicant. The applicant' s narrative states that down lighting will be in the soffits to enhance security and reduce glare into adjacent sites. The applicant has proposed in the narrative to provide parking lot illumination via 400 watt metal hallide (for light color quality) pole mounted shoe-box type fixture. A shoe-box fixture will direct the light down to reduce glare. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application, and offered no comments or objections. FINDING: The Police Department has not provided any objections or concerns with regard to the proposal, therefore, conceptually the proposed lighting is sufficient to meet the standard. However, the applicant shall meet the following condition in order to fully meet the standard: CONDITION:The applicant shall provide a lighting plan showing all locations and types of building and parking lot lighting. Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and(3) Connecting paths to the shelters. Tri-Met was notified, however, has not provided any comments on this application. The City does not required additional transit facilities for this site. FINDING: This standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 26 OF 34 Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. • In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and • A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The applicant proposes 47% of the gross site to be landscaped, which exceeds considerably the minimum 15% requirement for percentage of landscaping of the gross site area. There is approximately 36% of the gross site which will is currently vegetated and will be left undeveloped on the eastern portion of the site. FINDING: The minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be met with the proposed landscape plan, therefore, this criterion is met. Drainage: Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This criterion is addressed under Street and Utility Improvements, Section 18.810.100.A and D under this decision. Provision for the disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. The requirement for accessible parking spaces for parking lots between 1 to 25 spaces is one (1) accessible parking space which shall be at least nine feet wide and shall have an adjacent access aisle, located on the passenger side that is at least six feet wide (except that two adjacent accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle). In addition, one in every eight accessible spaces, but not less than one shall be van accessible which is at least nine feet wide with an adjacent access aisle of at least eight feet wide. The applicant is required to have, and has provided one van accessible parking space. However, no parking space dimensions are shown on the plans. FINDING: The proposed parking plan does not meet this standard, as no parking space dimensions are shown on the plans. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall meet the following conditions: CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the site plan and provide dimensions for the van accessible parking space. • A sign shall be posted for each accessible parking space. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 27 OF 34 • Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant provided an impact study as part of the narrative portion of the application. According to the applicant's impact study: Based on a roposed square footage of 3, 529 and ITE code of 710 (institute of Traffic Engineers, 6th edition ISBN 0-93540309-11) 16.58 trips per day, per thousand gross leasable area (GSA) can be expected to be generated approximately additional 59 average weekday trips can be anticipated. The average weekday trip rate can be modified by .65 trip length and 1.0 link trip the actual average trip per day can be expressed in the following formula: (3.529 (1000sf) x 16.58= 58.51 x .65 trip length factor 38.03 Adjust for trip length x 1 .00 Linked trip factor 38.00 total average trips per day. Other impacts according to the applicant's study: Increase in net impervious surface is 6,040 square feet. Addition of 100.50 cubic feet of storage to assure .30 cfs/acre, accomplished by means of surface detention basin, and if required a bioswale. Water and Sewer: Anticipated water consumption for domestic use to be approximately 300 cubic feet, per month, year round, and 2,450 cubic feet at peak irrigation months. Rough Proportionality Analysis The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. According to ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, office buildings generate 16.31 trips per thousand square foot per day, therefore, the Bank of Portland would be expected to generate 57.5 trips per day. As $184 is the office use per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF Ordinance, the estimated TIF is determined by multiplying $184 x 57.5 daily trips. Between July 1 , 1999 and July 1 , 2000 (fees are scheduled to go up after July 1 , 2000) it is estimated that the applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $10,592 based on 3,529 square feet of office space. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32% of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100% of this projects traffic impact is $33,100 ($10,592 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $22,508. The applicant is required to dedicate approximately 5 feet of right-of-way (35 feet of ROW east of the roadway centerline required total). The estimated cost of this ROW dedication is $1 ,170 based on $3 per square feet of land area. Because the total transportation impact is $33,100, and the estimated cost of street dedication is $1,170 the proposed street dedication is easily proportional to the impact of the development. Therefore, the applicant is paying only a small portion of the projects impact on the transportation system. F. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 28 OF 34 Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080(A) of the TDC, Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS), requires a minor arterial street to have a 70-foot right-of-way width and 46-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 68th Parkway, which is classified as a minor arterial in the TTDS. At present, this street is improved with adequate pavement width and curbing, but lacks street trees behind the existing sidewalk. The applicant should plant street trees per TDC standards. The applicant is also proposing to install a new concrete driveway to serve the new building. A street opening permit is required for any work in the public ROW. The most current tax assessor's map indicates that there is less than 35 feet of ROW east of the roadway centerline. Therefore, additional ROW is necessary from this site. The applicant must dedicate the additional ROW prior to issuance of a building permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. At present, there is a concrete sidewalk along the frontage of SW 68th Parkway. No other sidewalk improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that crosses this site from SW 68th Parkway. The applicant is proposing to relocate a portion of this sewer line so that the new building can be properly located. Staff does not oppose the relocation, but the work will need to be covered by a public improvement permit from the City Engineer. Prior to construction, the plans for the sewer line work must be approved by the City Engineer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Based upon the applicant's onsite storm drainage plan, it appears that any upstream runoff will be adequately accommodated. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 29 OF 34 • Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates that they will provide on-site detention partially within their parking area and partially in a new pond structure to the east of their parking area. Staff reviewed the engineer's preliminary calculations and finds that the surface detention and the proposed pond will provide adequate detention volume to handle the additional runoff. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. The City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, therefore, no bikeway is required. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. The City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, therefore, no bikeway is required. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. This standard is not applicable as the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan does not identify a future extension of the bikeway at this site, and therefore, no bikeway is required. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 30 OF 34 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are no existing overhead utility lines in front of this site. All new utilities into this development must be placed underground. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides the public water in this area. The applicant must coordinate with TVWD with regard to the proposed water service for the building. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qua ity facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate they will treat their stormwater in an onsite water quality pond. The preliminary sizing calculations reviewed by Staff indicate that the proposed pond will sufficiently handle the additional runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading and erosion control plan must be provided to the Building Division as a part of the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 31 OF 34 For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long-Range Planning Division has reviewed this application and provided the following comments: Are they getting a variance from the minimum aisle width requirement of 24 feet? City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has provided the following comments: 1 . The accessible route in front of the accessible parking space shall have a minimum width of 68 inches. The required width is 36 inches plus 32 inches for the vehicle overhang over the curb. 2. The fire department access route passing through the easement is impeded by the accessible parking stall and the island, and doesn't meet the required radius. Further, when they finalize this route, they will be required to treat that portion where this route crosses the accessible route as a marked crossing. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Property Manager/Operations Department has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. City of Tigard Water Department./Utilities Manager has reviewed this application and commented that the site is outside of their water service area. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Fish and Wildlife has reviewed the application and provided the following comments: 1 . A site review completed during April, 2000. Based on our observations our comments focus on stormwater treatment and enhancement of the riparian habitat. Stormwater 2. The application indicated that detention will be provided but no bio-treatment of the water is proposed. Since the stormwater run-off discharges to a natural waterway, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife recommends that bio-treatment of the stormwater prior to discharging off-site. A design based upon the treatment standards outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management can modify the existing ditch into a bio-treatment pond or swale. 3. The trees removed for site preparation can be used to diversify the habitat around the stormwater treatment facility. The removal should allow the rootwads to remain attached to the trunk. ODFW is available to provide technical assistance for the placement of woody debris. Riparian Plantings 4. The eastern end of the property is currently dominated by non-native blackberries. This part of the site also includes parts of two drainageways. We strongly encourage the applicant to restore native vegetation on this part of the site to restore riparian functions (fish and wildlife habitat, water quality, flood storage) to benefit fish and wildlife resources. ODFW is willing to partner with the applicant and other interested group to replant the area. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 32 OF 34 Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the application and provided the following comments.. On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&D 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. Tigard Planning Staff Response: The land-use application was submitted before February 4, 2000, and was deemed complete on March 15, 2000, therefore, the new R&D 00-7 does not apply. The applicable Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management were adopted by USA in 1996 including any future revisions or amendments. Sanitary Sewer: The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R & O. Storm Sewer: The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&D. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24 hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. Water Quality: Developer should provided a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Sensitive Area: A "Sensitive Area" exists in the vicinity of the site. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&D separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. Division of State Lands/Corps of Engineers: A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. ODOT was notified and provided no comments or objections. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue was notified, but no comments were provided. Tualatin Valley Water District has reviewed the application and has no objections. Tri-Met was notified, but no comments were provided. US West Communications was notified, but no comments were provided. PGE has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. NW Natural Gas was notified, but no comments were provided. TCI Cable has reviewed this application and offered no comments or objections. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) was notified, but no comments were provided. Oregon Division of State Lands was notified, but no comments were provided. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was notified, but no comments were provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 33 OF 34 • SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 24, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 8, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. ✓J, -�t✓/ ��i �_. ,( ' May 24, 2000 PREP' RED cY: Karen Perl Fo' DATE Associate Planner May 24, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:cu rpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR1999-00026—BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 34 OF 34 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,!‘ i Crir OF TIOARD EASEMENT FROM • ,o.o �A10 HOTEL ro r WALL 51CaN •.see E\ see s'si• ..,0 g (N @ HANDICAP V •�\�(�`\ - C O PARKING ePACE- a De'N!b•E 0''',.\ P��'• O ze014' o -®��,\ . PROPOSED % ��I NNEN , • �o ), �s BUILDING 6 e Y 1. V, PEOEeTItlAN WALKL+�" I y-0•�9 0� L I _ a 9_ DA'K OF►ORTLAND sc. \ N M'y'S6'W— _ _®� N 59'451' W 4 gg 4 V— \''. .i \ 6611N E!'4i'I'W 101D1' 9 T 19 N 59'49'46"W ,1113' b B be59'. a\ �\ *SW 69TH AVENUE IS NOW SW 68TH PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION CITYOFTIGARD T BANK OF PORTLAND SITE PLAN N (SDR)1999-00026) (Map is not to scale) �— �_ ,-= CITY of TIGARD CO ____ , ' f ir GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM j -_ I*,r_1Jal LEAF-C-- OAK ST I VICINITY MAP i�1a��i t.��I L i ,��„�,.:�� �- _ ritatiowil fi[ SDR 1 999-00026 _ ST ST 1 i - BANK OF PORTLAND III" _I _ 1 ___ _ mop , JCEI f ST . — SUBJECT 4 IP� l SITE �A_ , ms`s 7 _. ______, . `/ N W im i__________,Iii N 1111 illi \\\\\ Vf o W N I i J , Z 0 200 400 600 Feet IM 1"=476 feet A .+ .1 A ST, L riliu-, ,• City of Tigard _ Q I Information on this map is for general location only and _ R ST should be verified w th the Development Services Division • W 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 ' Q.� (503)639-4171 _ http:lfwuw.ci.tigard.or.us NM Community Development Plot date: May 24,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR Bank of Salem "EXHIBIT B" Attn: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman SDR1999-00026 PO Box 847 BANK OF PORTLAND Portland, OR 97308 Way W. Lee, General Contractor 5210 SE 26th Avenue Portland, OR 97205 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY O TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community STATE OF ougoW ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) I NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director n NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . / AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) I City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council L NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:, AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director I Tigard Hearings Officer -- Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, marked hibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit" ,on Ma 2 2000 .and.de•o,•ed in t e United States Mail on May 24,2000, postage prepaid. (�- at • ::.re. •oti,:) • Subscribed and sworn/affirmed be ore me on the / cj day of �� (y , 2000. "X", OFFICIAL SEAL 4 At - `/"L_ C.Z. SHERMAN S. CASPER III I I ' NOTARY COMMISSION PUBLIC-OREGON 323409 My Commission Expires: /3 2 ci3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 EXIT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 1 999-00026 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development BANK OF PORTLAND Shaping ABetterCommunity 120 DAYS =7/12/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: BANK OF PORTLAND CASE NO. Site Development Review SDR1999-00026 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval for new construction of a 3,529 square foot two-story office building. APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Lees, General Contractor Attn: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman 5210 SE 26 Avenue P.O. Box 847 Portland, Oregon 97205 Portland, Oregon 97308 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General-Commercial District; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G; General-Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, min-warehouse, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 6505. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: r____ THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 24, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Aea�l The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 8, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Perl Fox at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT /IL t, EASEMENT FROM 4-.. HOTEL \i i�� e BULDG eu \\. lAi 1 i i\ T., 'SW 69'AVENUE IS NOW SW 6e°PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION CITY OF TIGARD f BANK OF PORTLAND i SITE PLAN N (SDR)1999-00026) (Map is not to scale) NOM L E -14Lj—I1 Thj7:71—A .� _. — VICINITY MAP A I _L = �_-�`�r~ % 1 I I MIEN 1.111 /+ SDR1999-00026 I.h I ` _ '- ��'E '// BANK OF PORTLAND lia /'� , SUBJEC -- . M r R i SITE II; A t , W ip , ._ 1 , 1_, F. 1 f,,_,, 2 111 ~� W N // 1 Z r- / rvwr■ A ®r TI C, 1101. LIC « 4P? R ■ EXHIBIT B 1S136AD-06300 1S136AD-06390 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC REIDT WILLIAM 121 SW SALMON ST 621 SW ALDER PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97205 1S136AD-06502 136AD-06503 WAY W LEE WA E ENERAL 5210 SE 26TH 5210 -- 26 PORTLAND,OR 97202 •RTLAND,OR 97202 1 S 136AD-06504 1 36AD-06505 DESAI MARK WAY • ENERAL CONTRACTOR I 14320 SW 134TH DR 5211 : 2. ST TIGARD,OR 97224 -•RTLAND,O' • 202 1 136AD-06506 1 S136AD-06507 TIG 'D C OF JHCB PROPERTIES LLC 131 HALL 11460 SW PACIFIC HWY ARD,O' •7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 136AD-06711 1S136DA-00100 D •I M•' BENENSON 68TH PARKWAY 14321 134TH DR PO BOX 15144 DEPT: KEY T). ARD, •e 97224 WORCESTER,MA 1.91.5 O 1S136DA-00200 1S136DA-00600 POLLOCK DONALD E LOUIE STEVEN P& 1834 SW 58TH AVE STE 202 11920 SW VIEWCREST CT PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 8,225. g7�L`f 1S136DA-00700 1S136DA-02400 HI HAT INC WAY W LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC 11530 SW BARBUR BLVD 5210 SE 26TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1` 6DA-02401 TIGAR• •F 131 - H•. IGARD,OR 97223 S,!<111 (c4`'i- Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue i:lcurplrAsetupllabels\ClT East.doc UPDATED: 12-Apr-00 Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 • • 1 - A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING .Y - CITY OF TIOARD Community<Deve(opment Shaping Better Community STA(JeL of OREGON ) County of Was fiington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Shirley L. Treat, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist I for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Apptopnate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF: PENDING APPLICATION FOR: . BANK OF PORTLAND,[SDR11999-00026 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (Type/Kind of Nonce) (File No./Name Reference) (14-Day Comment Penod) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION FOR:ii ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: , ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: ,�j ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S1 of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on March 21, 2000, and deposited in the United States Mail on March 21. 2000, postage prepaid. >jkAAJ-Li ,G *,kl-Let.La/— Person that Prepared Notice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day of ,09P0e/4 , 2000. / . // / � �'� cEORGia ZEAL R N 1 t BY PU: IF OF OREGON `°+;:;A� NOTARY PUBLIC-0REGON C°10"MISSION N0.315664 My Commission Expires: tic,- �� "704*- MY COMMISSION EXPIRES At1G 25 2002 -NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PRONE-M A E4 TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION Al- Pit SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF T O .TI GARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 21, 2000 FILE NO./NAME: (SDR)1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND PROPOSAL: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of S.W. 69th Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620,18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON APRIL 4, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. SDR1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND Failure of any party to addres Ae relevant approval criteria with . icient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ,ao :23-81 4301 I, WE — •1 F 4 r F\G ' Qp \— r; It "" i -- 3 'o sew 0. rryo r •, y 1 fr L E E ar ru e i wu• sac..ron�xr.un.osca•ssurwowx•nw,ua r.rancs,•„o r� a co...r,.•aswcs,cu•e. µwruwraw Grua...ons.ws.uu,.•wia.rwws 4_ SDR1999-00026/BANK OF PORTLAND 'SW 69r"AVENUE IS NOW SW 68TH PARKWAY AT THAT LOCATION • 1St 36AD-06300 is 136AD-06390 EXHIBIT( T�+ j� PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 62 ID yy WILLIAM L R XAIBI l L 121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S 136AD-06502 136AD-06503 WAY W LEE WA E ENERAL 5210 SE 26TH 5210 26 PORTLAND,OR 97202 RTLAND,OR 97202 1S136AD-06504 1 36AD-06505 DESAI MARK WA ENERAL CONTRACTOR I 14320 SW 134TH DR 5211 : 2. ST TIGARD,OR 97224 ••RTLAND,O' • 202 1 136AD-06506 1S136AD-06507 TIG•'D C • OF JHCB PROPERTIES LLC 131 • HALL 11460 SW PACIFIC HWY ARD,0"7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 136AD-06711 1S136DA-00100 D •I M•• BENENSON 68TH PARKWAY 14321 134TH DR PO BOX 15144 DEPT:KEY T) ARD, •: 97224 WORCESTER, MA 1'81-5 O 1S136DA-00200 1S136DA-00600 POLLOCK DONALD E LOUIE STEVEN P& 1834 SW 58TH AVE STE 202 11920 SW VIEWCREST CT PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR q 7zLY 1S136DA-00700 1S136DA-02400 HI HAT INC WAY W LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC 11530 SW BARBUR BLVD 5210 SE 26TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1' 6DA-02401 TIGARD •F 131 H• IGARD,OR 97223 1S136AD-06300 1S136AD-06390 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC REIDT WILLIAM 121 SW SALMON ST 621 SW ALDER PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97205 1S136AD-06502 136AD-06503 WAY W LEE WA E ENERAL 5210 SE 26TH 5210 26 PORTLAND, OR 97202 RTLAND,OR 97202 1 S 136AD-06504 1 36AD-06505 DESAI MARK WAY • - ENERAL CONTRACTOR I 14320 SW 134TH DR 5211 : 2. ST TIGARD,OR 97224 •RTLAND,O' ' 202 1 136AD-06506 1S136AD-06507 TIG• 'D C • OF JHCB PROPERTIES LLC 131 ■ HALL 11460 SW PACIFIC HWY ARD,O' •7223 TIGARD,OR 97223 136AD-06711 1S136DA-00100 D •I M•' BENENSON 68TH PARKWAY 14321 134TH DR PO BOX 15144 DEPT: KEY T)6ARD, •e 97224 WORCESTER, MA 1•61'5 ;>i t✓ r 1S136DA-00200 1S136DA-00600 POLLOCK DONALD E LOUIE STEVEN P& 1834 SW 58TH AVE STE 202 11920 SW VIEWCREST CT PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 9.722 g7ZL`f 1S136DA-00700 1S136DA-02400 HI HAT INC WAY W LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC 11530 SW BARBUR BLVD 5210 SE 26TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1` 6DA-02401 TIGARD •F A13'1 - H• I IGARD,OR 97223 CITY of TIGARD / GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM -r ' AREA NOTIFIED """"'" (500') SUBJECT 9g� SITE SDRI 999-00026 . A IN i\i„, ,..,., .. GUM 111041110144111 11111ustin f111111111111111 . 111114411488 I . A N 0 100 200 300 400 Feet 1'=280 feet i. A 4 City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and I / should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd J ST Tigard,OR 97223 ATLAN-A /-1----I (503)639-4171 II I ../1" 1 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 3, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR APPLICANT MATERIALS . e/ ^1Lb SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW i;,,V �•��� TYPE II APPLICATION ' CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: kes DATE OF PRE-APP.: t f'�(`i Property Address/Location(s): AblAtiDOT T(7 1 O jtIQ FOR STAFF USE ONLY 5 . 14f oE. C. Guur��I ///cr/ Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): ( J i'3‘ Pr° 06505 Case No.(s): 50R/999 -0.64c749 Other Case No.(s): Site Size: MI 391-6ei2c6b4-/44 Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: W A-41 k) . LEA GEVUi 4_ Con ��te ,a- l N C Date: r Address: $olio SE .76"f APE Phone: ,'t3cE_oc9/ City: t'O 21LA-0 o(C Zip:(17.D.5- Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Bili\)_ O(- S 4 !l Comp Plan/Zone Designation: P Address: P.o • 6ou 8 Phone: 503-3'1'3-137? City: S6 -t-e)4•1/ Zip: 73O8 CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26198 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY 2' Application Form Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site La/ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): Construction of an office building Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ( 3529 square feet on two floors ) with Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/7"x 11") 2699 sf footprint. Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Also see narrative. Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) [r 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped _. Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100.00 - s ,9-9).... :00 ($1 MiIIiond,Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NONE APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of OCT D U E fe , 19 ?.C? W . t^E E G EN Cv r i v(Z,/NC. Own•is gnature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Narrative The following narrative provide finding based on the applicable approval standards of City of Tigard, Community Development Code The Site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 Acres.) The site was developed as a continuation of 69th Street right-of-way and later vacated. Approximate 4,256 square feet (.10 Acres) of abandon improvement exists today along with existing storm sewer. Our proposed project includes a new office building (3,529 square feet on two floors total) with 2,699 SF footprint. The building is located on the Northerly property line and as far to the west as permitted by ordinance. The design of building takes advantage of diagonal frontage (to the interior property lines) by employing a saw tooth concept to provide visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located to the East end to provide presence at the street without adversely effecting the light and air concerns. Access to the parking is 10' South property line to allow the existing Cedar trees largely remain intact. The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16' is located at the rear of the proposed structure. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North and Carrow's parking lot and returns to SW 69th Street. 18.360 Site Development Review We comply with the requirements of Section 18.360 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. 18.620 Triangle Design Standards We comply with the requirements of Section 18.620 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. The design of building takes advantage of diagonal frontage (to the interior property lines) by employing a saw tooth concept to provide visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located to the East end to provide presents at the street without adversely effecting the light and air concerns at the Right-of-way. Fifty percent of the ground floor wall length, facing the street is window. The base of the building is brick veneer, and the upper portion is horizontal lap siding. The roofing will be an Architectural • Composition. All roof mounted equipment (if any) will be obscured from view. 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16'. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North and Carrow's parking lot and returns to SW 69th Street. Evidence of this access easement is enclosed herein. Pedestrian access is by means of a sidewalk immediately South of the proposed building. This access shall not exceed 1 :20 slope. 18.730 Exception to Development None requested. 18.745 Landscaping We comply with the requirement s of Section 18.745 and 18.620.080 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. The parking lot is screen from SW 69th Street by the mass of the proposed building. We are providing two(2) street trees of 2 1/2" caliper on our 56' frontage. 18.755 Mixed Waste and Recycling Storage A refuse and recycling enclosure is provided at the East end of Parking lot. This enclosure will comply with the Franchise hauler requirements. 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements The Use of the building is office (Table 18.765.2) is 2.7 Spaces per 1 ,000 SF minimum and 3.9 spaces per 1,000 SF. 3.529k SF Building x 2.7 = 9.52 minimum parking required 3.529k SF Building x 3.9 = 13.76 maximum parking required We are providing 11 full sized (9'x18.5') and one accessible space. With appropriate maneuvering aisle (figure 18.765.1 .) The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16'. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North No Load Zone is provided, as the building is fewer than 10,000 Square feet. A 10' buffer is provided on the south side of the parking Two bicycle spaces will be provided near the front door (covered parking) entry. 18.780 Signs Signs are as indicated on Site and Sign Plans. They are existing signs, to be moved from the current location. The signs are internally illuminated. The freestanding sign is 15' in height and contains 40SF reading: "Bank of Portland." A second sign mounted on the North side of Building (15'x3') also reading: "Bank of Portland." 18.790 Tree Removal We are retaining over 75 percent of existing trees over 12' in caliper, according to Section 18.709.030 (B)d no mitigation is required. Existing trees will be protected by being outside of area work and beyond silt fence. New trees (i.e. Street trees and Parking lot trees) will be protected by being located beyond concrete curbs. This will protect trees from damage due to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas Our drive is an in only driveway. The vision clearance required (30'x30') is demonstrated on the Site plan. It should be noted the adjacent site, through which we are exiting the parking lot also has 30'x 30' vision clearance area. • Impact Study Based on a proposed Square footage of 3,529 and ITE code of 710 (Institute of Traffic Engineers, 6th edition ISBN 0-93540309-11) 16.58 trips per day, per thousand Gross Leasable Area (GSA,) can be expected to be generated approximately additional 59 average weekday trips can be anticipated. The average weekday trip rate can be modified by .65 trip length and a 1 .0 Link trip the actual average trip per day can be expressed in the following formula: average [3.529 (1000sf) x 16.58= 58.51] x .65 trip length factor } 38.03Adjust for trip length X 1 .0 Linked trip factor 38.00 total average trips per day The Site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 Acres.) The site was developed as a continuation of 69th Street right-of-way and later vacated. Approximate 4,256 square feet (.10 Acres) of abandon improvement exists today along with existing storm sewer. Our proposed project include a new office building (3,529 square feet on two floors total) with 2,699 SF footprint. And an additional 7,597 square feet of Parking and other impervious surface. The net increase in impervious surface is 6,040 feet. Based on the following assumptions: 1 . 50 year Storm 2. The difference of discharge between pervious and Impervious area We will add approximately 100.50 cubic feet of storage to assure .30 cfs/acre. This will be accomplished by mean of surface detention basin and if required a bioswale Water and Sewer We anticipate the water consumption for domestic use to be approximately 300 cubic feet, per month, year around. We further anticipate the water consumption during the irrigation months to be as high as 2450 cubic feet at peak. Further Impact We anticipate no further impact than noted above. I Bank of Salem is a small business bank. It has an office in Salem and an office in Portland, DBA "Bank of Portland". Bank of Portland would relocate to its own building in Tigard on this proposed site. The bank is a commercial lender. It does not have a drive-in or ATM's, and does not do consumer loans. On the average the Portland Branch makes five (5) large business or commercial real estate loans per month. We have three (3) full time employees and one parttime. Our traffic would compare with a single doctor dental office with 1.5 to 2 customers per hour. Our deposits come generally from certificates of deposit with maturities of 1 to 2 years. We usually see our depositors once or twice per year. For any questions please contact: Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman, Bank of Salem 503-393-1377 (home phone) CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 3529 sq ft x $60.00= $211,740.00 utility connections, fees, sewer and storm relocation, landscaping, architectural fees, paving and miscellaneous $100,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $311,740.00 Bank of Salem P. C. Vrontakis Board Chairman 503-393-1377 (home) btliIt LVUI IaUV'4�i fib= Y (I) 40mW WI SNOEBOX FIXTURES o ON 25' SQUARE TUBE POLE I.o 4200 `= .e 0 C 5603-MI • 540 i i 7. E _ CV L r • 4300 I 4301 IN 111. .ipipi u• i to 4 ��� tsn+ . v, _\�f�� 4 0,.4 0 0 3" __,.fi ill >e 2a �� w �* .t f • ••• na�` • ,pf• 1 •• 6500 \f+�j s+ ,,.+ Is504 S..,r,r.. T. 1 QA C- • .n.t. �" 1 : Ail:,A 6 c1l°'F . r 1 A1. 1 It •' a`' • ..f•m II � f. n L ;,.115 CIW S7CPF .S1 .1 ...-.»�- a ~ 09f 6507 •` J « 1a� l.r 4C. • 1 6503 .r 43544 3 6506 I .0.4.r.. ,r = . ! i • 0 • 0 111 • :1 W A Y I o� • -9L , • _/ o� —. 'n- + 6505 % iortML^.0 R - i a J74G. PONT • F c 'w .M .�dfdt . WOKS! 1C1,11 u.aa• ___LIC 1 I SEE MAP IS I 360A THIS YAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISES,AND THE kit , COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS,IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,AND LOCATIONS ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. N } NI:U4 SECTION asrrs Nits wiA IS ama acr maim W ioM cayiYr oaii, seow • L! n. mic-_____� : i q I 4 1 ■ .6.14.1..m• 3 /TOO a 1 r g 3 ICI ... f 3 MI tr D oc s is 0 1 I p Q • I i100 yy 1 q tip a°:D itt 3 1 artr ktlr C N6. • 4. j • ' • 4444... I M• I l S S F ; • ' iill 1 -1------- . -1. ... k. i., It "" j i ' I 111111;, " - New _i. ! Aa 41.41 x 2 t two 11or Isar Fro 66.13 4 - it VII• • L 1 W 3e u&r.a roc . 6.ir�` 0 w n • '•$ • S w PIN E STREET of G0,r ,"�+' rae �0"`a► o..... C • • I4• 74:1 - WO. ■ava soon 4K1 d . ....6.. Ile a 144 fins J ,.Tim... i .y , I. �J .aaa AM 9I ▪ alma •. --•- -�•, Le yte l Hta ...• Of r• • In 4 - - - i N -I j4 wo ••• I 4,...■.0 ' - -'t 4200 i i alma 1,041. • ! , ay-• nK 1 A • 7 r •Ay1 • j • GEE Y.( •• moo,. at. a n IRpN • h*Y t. , .q6..v, /t5t s.o. y 5•aa i I I I W *0 A Y ,,I L E E Il.WT .YIPDail 04L ..F.,,,a /on anve,t,tq THIS MAP Is PROVIDED AS A COURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting In locating said premises, and the Company assumes 4:11- no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, areas, and locations ascertained by actual survey, , .. _ e N . 12„.. ....",_cowe.ey, .,. .. ' .. 1.,.1..�,.• f..••1 • .� l4IT 'L iNSUR ►H:: CCFARI 1RECONT' .,_. _ -_, 4398 r, - r KNOW ALL MEN 8Y ruue PRESENTS, That P lDCO I$C,, en OTagon Corporation I a corPoMtiotr duty organised ' and 'rioting under She laws of the Sr...of ... .Ors6?A •, hereinalrer called grantor. lot the consideration I� hereinafter stared, doe, hereby grant.bargain,sell and convey unto • WAY,1i. LIS. CCIR9AL CDt1fACSOg, INC.,I' ` an Oregon Corporation " • ., . lwreirw. l.r called gratUre • •, and granters hairs, sue iegptl and assigns. that Corkin real propr?f• with she letsa4t*'•r•. hereditament. and ap- purtanaraeae IMrevaia belonging or appertaining. .boate th d in e County of ltaahlniton ,and Scarf of Oregon,deathbed at idnceow,lo•wir: exhibit •A Attache4 • . .J. • Sobjact to: Statutory powers and aeeeasments of Unified Sewerage Agency; rights of t, the public in and to any portion lying within the boundaries cf roads or highways; rr, Easement to Pacific Telephone and Telagr•ph Company rev ,dad June 11, 1940, gook 190 page • 388; Basement to Portland Cameral Electric Coslpeny :Pacotded March 16, 1959 gook 415 papa 308; and Limited Aegean and eOhditLone sat forth In deed from State of Oregon State Highway Cameros•ton to DT• tier= d. !lead• recorded May 3. 1967 gook 61.0 pap. 319, and moditled in inetruoenc recorded Dec. 3. 1975 Gook 1057 page 2), Washington County Records, t I " ,r broil ,l•*W FCla•11. CONTINUA putpinKso O,must i,wq To Hay. and to Hold the tame unto the raid grantee and grante■'s heirs, eueosr.ors and assigns I . And mid grantor hereby cotenants to and with said granree and !ranee'heirs. su.xeuafs and aaldn,that grantor ii lawfully seined in fee simple of she above granted pfanila..had iron"all an al nhPaelcet Erases ,for any liens or encumberencs; suffered or crert,ed.,4y.cso,tract purchaser avbeequsnc.to `� i rail estate contract dated Sept, 13, l974, .aa atseched. to. Amendment to cflntrecc..ea••••• corded March 24, 1915 pooh 1015 pegs 036, re.-re.corded. Apr11 9. 19.15..Book 1011_pap 878 Washington County I(.oue4a- 4 and that grantor will"warrant and forever defend the above • granted Wrvm,ses and every parr and parcel thereat against the lawful(Jaime and demgr+el stil none whomsoever. , ercopr rhosa claiming under the above described eneumbrancos, glum in partial fulfillment of contract 1. The true and eetuCI eattaidrrativn paid Int Mi. ,ran.►e►, brand in terms at dolls,.,i.3 107.500.00 • 1 '.However, the actual considetarion consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is X.,,,` Consideration (indicate whichJ.- g ( in construing this deed and where she conr.;l eo require., the singular includ.t the plural, • •s . 1 Donn by ardor of the grantor's board of directors,wit Ire corporor.sera/sighed, ,. _ ...# MIS •;ra 'r day Pl f fT,..yt c , 19 7 - 'I r,� ,_ ,, ~i iSt��) PPQPCO INC. 'f_, :.ft 1 Y4S4....44....--' President ' . ' . : ,11 ; . 8y Sa'et*nary - -_,,i / 1 sr,rr OF OREGON, cal,ttu�a 't •{...�•f.:..44 Aft.' Jr is V 40. !A yc P.r.onally appeared �•£-. / I t.'/_Lw..•1 . and `� , wlro, being duly sworn, each for hrmaelf and not one for the other, did way that the format is the • president and that the latter is the .l4 WCratary o! a corpora ion, and that the seal affixed to the lore.oing instrument is the Corporate Peal of aaid corporation and that said instrument was - • >rpuea Atmy K.4v .1, hei,wil VI baiu W;i/.....vl• L) ..,a.wit) a 5:,7.d, e:i7 :'3: ^.i --.5!::i •w•• Acknc'vrh •edged weld rnalrumrnl to be its ■oluntarr set and deed, ��/ Before me: aed1derJ/3V/ 49.44.' foal • • (OffiUAi. Sew►.) Notary Public Mr Oreg.) r My r romi■'ion .rpi►rs:�/ y//�rircf !iA - .. sr/Srx .011_1.. 1MM.. M•..n.... •....&• '.II.M MHI.a..,•.wV N bl•w.. r.•e.••••■ I. t.,e.• 1 .w.err r,.154,51,11.1 i w , , 9^ • WARRANTY 1JEE - r of OREGON '�• ' CORPORATION county or • ;e...` P.F1dC.Q..1ne• I cerrif) that the wrthi„ m>rru• 1 Jefferson Terrace merle arse received for record on th, ' -' 1.+1.4 G.—au, ar•aan ;7034 I • oat or tr • • OaF'r v■. Tr,. `It ,w•••w err o'cfwk M . and recorded Way LI, Lee ••s •ri.•N.. y . .,can.e.ra1...Cunt.tact.or., ice in book on rrQr v a+ ,. C..F 5210 S. E . 26th, •,$)--..■ Blind err number . Rec. - 1�^a" ...° fled of De.d• of said Cnu.rt. M V.■ aeeoativN4 MiF. F .e WIIM)) nn' hare e,i real nl 'At INSURANCE COM'Ar1Y Count,. attired. Z I Cr)"`C1: W (.",..L'. HOLD '. c I $[.vt.'tCN. Qalr''»t e'ena I �j 101'1 Chits; 1.`:+teii 50 G i! PALk. 44 Title Tilt gt+RNaMa t t o l Or prpur► Villftl. Ye BI Mtel Gmmoveceor lne. .. CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 July 26, 1999 Job 6016-1 Mr. Pete Vrontakis 1420 Rafael St. N Salem, OR 97303 Dear Pete: We visited TL 6505 on SW 69 Ave, just south of Carrows Restaurant on July 22, 1999 . During our visit we inventoried the trees on the site, as it will be, after the double Property Line Adjustment, that is presently in progress. We found that there are 40 trees with a diameter of 12" in diameter or larger. During our visit we also noted that there were approximately 30-40 trees that were under 12" in diameter. If we can be of any further assistance please feel free to call on us. Respectfully, ied?,/.,44%1/ Albert Hertel Corp. Sec. BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 AUGUST 25, 1999 JOB No. 6016-3 PETER VRONTAKIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT AFTER PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT A TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF TRACT "B" AND PART OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AND A PART OF THE VACATED PORTION OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE, ALL OF PARCEL 2 AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 80-27388 , WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, AND A PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, THE BOUNDARY OF WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A 2 INCH IRON PIPE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE"; THENCE N89°49 '46"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 188 . 59 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT NUMBER 80-27388; THENCE N89°46 '01"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND SAID BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, 172. 25 ' TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 85043572; THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT 23 . 10 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "COOPER CONSULTANTS" , SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 280.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°43 '35" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N26°39 '23"W 23 . 09 FEET; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 56 . 62 FEET; THENCE S89°45 '56"E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "B" , 107 . 84 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE S00°38 '07"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 2, 13 . 66 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING N00°38 '07"E 51. 34 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S89°49 '46"E 290. 74 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S00°03 '44"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 3, 56 . 34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 22, 590 SQUARE FEET OR 0 . 519 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT 5036443190 CASLJELL4HERTEL&EAGLE 690 P01 JUN 23 '99 13:49 W U "' aJ Sc1 . CMd 591 '0!030 �:a MQii I moo ' I * `� m _ m b CU iGL•4£ '6,.,_,, _.,,-„.4 c ig if1 tie; , .,17-f ' S I. $1 "``*•,1\ta as I: il ,,�o, .az�;.=-,,;� r I� J •. n Q of•la 5 iko Li ut um � .r / i �\ i 6•I '—• / l .. .IS'LS 3AO.Oi+.00N co-- , 5 f rdej 1 H il : I 5* - .-- ' i k..k/. 1,, , �y I . , I W T I i l k, . 5 . •E 1 I I ! t0 i i I I I ! a ' 1, '1) t;€33 .10, 4 #1 ' ! '" i 4' A \ iLi i 1 7., .:. 1 N .. ! '12 litsi ....... . . ocnco-I • < `-'' �+ ■ l G � L . EASEMENT FROM t _ HOTEL i . I\ 71.6 !WI*_W=:11' - 0 , ........., Mg ,,,...., PROP V3G'lT. 7.-1 1w V:e.M1.�.r� �av� 3 BUILDING �' ��1 "°"°"°" ` BUILDING SUMMARY ii �� d �� �` ..,;,yg ^ter.' I L J i 1I . if *.f,N, ‘ i I eg ;:\\ SITEPLAN OD was... 4 D : • cvoca-1 • ® rr c� • ss AMA MO .41.1 I ry .•. • •_—....re•.. O tiC CM MN MO OM M wu / a=il= ®, • 1 X 11=11 �•�t�d 11��ll a -- WMO OM M VTR 111M▪JO MR \ NOM▪ .� O .n•u.wur If<RIGATIONS SYMBOLS } x Xi I 'xi TREE PLANTING - VERTICAL STAKES M xI .•e Mg w... '"2 ;'FROM GMRLaI v. .® 1 . m: E ■ MN MM. Mir HO AMMO M.�• MR ura....• om..s.w.u.rrr..r rr .•a wrw• � ow.m..w�e.r.r. WM . MIMS (....:,‘ .... TREE REMOVAL PLAN Q cy INtuunm MAMMY \ x. x , x x •+ ® _ , ® EA , FROM ; L x > X•4. VI x ���.� n n N1•..0• ■Q dis Jai 7 �t 1 n Q 1. L�w.r..�-MD► ,,.. .,.. .... 2. X Ill.MN PM MOM AMIL CC �`!•L∎.-..••'/�t....a7Ti'-T-_V'.i [I7::S•!'_.°1-2:.3∎ts"1_\.1__,i.'' ♦ +� V T.r��` trraowwr ji n..w. • O a LANDSCAPE PLAN Qm :rs \ 1 .r..... ... — L1.1 OCl)p0-1 UJ . \' ZQ�� \ t 4 p-4 = O Cr cc "Z \ EASEMENT FROM '� g� �' �w HOTEL �rEr�,. g cfls ` '6 • •. ....I 1•11A4' �p t '.■ ►.MKrn.I.AOr w I PROPOSED-.\J 4�LrGT� �' rnUL Pa�–.aar�`.M0l M. t7.V1e�e<M'CY.PWfl) Taft r��L=r. V MKa! �� ��►` �� BUILDING �%""' 1111 !!!IU ■� "'DNON.0. 1 . BUILDONG SUMMARY op • t, aY�C �p 1 1.4..4••MOLE PRAWN !O D/L.VYl '�� • �..... -._. 1 ftç , IIII. IIIIIIU: 4.OC�DAR�LAT1 MAC[D •_ _ 4...--,.. ,C w�i w>,r•_ _ _ w a!sssTa _ -- _ IIIIII X a IIII► .III��I 7 ..;., \ \ I I it ii SO1 E 1 LAN 0 n' 4' .. 2.)..#a.0 uv ew.oae noe nnenson. t LICALI.P.ar a [sJ) 4 » wawa ns�roL! 1 \ \ ko.r∎nr` i..... ..ou t : w r , ,,r /�////////<�////%i nee �\4! __ -23-81 . .� r. , // \:. eL®/ G • F " E / 6. ................_..,,..... CalMET-Ai111A emu.PNL[>1CBRO.QF C%1RANOO.0 .au eau � at '£ -. FACE/3-FORMED AND EME.IEIUH N9DE PROCESS. __..1)___}1 �:1_ .. 0 1 I i :11.17 o. BLUE PMS mo. ~ Tlc464-1 OdCLON11l� to.71 • IIOFULD JAMES I t .% 'e ° /11 II/ xvz f '� ••••i:A . A■E : :1 thland . �,.� Grp i �� •=+ TRAB GLO �'oust meow. ` .�.�.....�........ .....�...-•.„::. POIF COVER-METAL FABRICATED.PAYffED SAME AS CAaNR�l%f.• .Fe. 1 ' CJ '. It C ;'- _ ...—y�. ".' ..... ix. 1 O / ■ iitlrie;h i: W a, A y.1 L E E ... ... ... 12 li=lairlataing====l1 .t1 W •.mat • SIGN DETAL MIC��10T�� MAP • NT► HT. CI / CC 1L.AP WANG it• II 0, .,. .,. a ,iiiii;____ .,. L.,,,„ . , _ 111,M3 El I In .I El &AMC CP PCPPLAPO I Mono Alitli _ - — - - — ■ �_aFrc.>K Ma•e! ■ sank vleamJ!� ■ �.' V' ■ - Portland — _ Hm * erorxT``1■ ■ • • ■ • 1 ,t 1u F = = = S _ _ _ — = = = — = _ __ _ – _-- - -D TL .A11l4NT IMO WEST SOUTH EAST 1 gimg 300 NO, DCALe,vs••r4 acnLa ve•1.-air DGAL! w.r m SPREAD f CI •- •••• •PLAIT SO THAT TOP Cr 11007 J`••1J LJ C �1 • •• EVE SOH TIE Q M Q-0-11-8 -PAM ALL an OVER i wA ® rATER Lw:IEA MRSHED GRAM ZQ va r O—. ca..nrour• CMS. GAL MIME 000A&O MA. ® RAN SRO ESP-1 `i RVRBER HOSE T� ' MO(flOr PPEVENTOR MAROrOCO 5TA1(ES 1 v rFBCO E25 Dvv D R.w SRO 1l04-1I SORES w/PCS WEAL mum- 1-3 STARES Y u 21 bbb 9a 1' WW1 DAN.1!'ARIY . .■ VKK S1 qV ®l) RNI SRO 1100-10-EST&11-CST IMES w/PCS ti"A'?!i r To ALnuotC YRwt Iii A. VKK•II USE 1104 Kr-5P ALMS ON LAD1 MfAS •"•�"^' '�TD ODD 2'N arx 1TANC Aeo.E P1RST scANe+El � �".©/rWPI! OR AS NECESSARY rOR"C" Ri1101E Car.OL YK YE ADLST 1EwOS N COWL ARCAS SUPPORT r � RAM ORD PGA IItlES `- r:'$f„ 1 ] !_ W MANUAL VALVE YAM L M PVC PFE CASs 200 ""••u II=11=N 9 II=11- SPECIFIED RAM IMO MX —1L-11; tl=11= - DRAM V&A LATERAL PVC PIPE CLASS 200 3/4'OW lA1ER l 1AAIP TO —171'=�=II=1I=•1:11.11=11 Q MET.DRAM CH EACH 1.11( ::a a was ""DAL AR POa0TS 1=11=71=11=II: 1 1 1XSA7=n- ALIT. IRRIGATION SYMBOLS II NOTE: 11=11 wuT.ORAM a EACH 1AE \ 11M100 Al REQUIRED L a■1.LL OW l SCALE NOT TO SCALE ti TREE PLANTING — VERTICAL STAKES DM SCALE: NOT 10 1CA E S.WILE© Fin EASEM i FR OM T LT rim \TNal IMES H R1OVm Ex11T0AA TREE1 >r-AC ArnR cllcwnn T/ /.e rl Pu* TO K 1e1v.�D rxCO v1NE PL.N•LE na n 1TE1t T PH P1U1 wORA /r' OM WPM( AUNTIILIAN ME T.• ►1A Lf-LEY PUl'1 1-y CAL O.D !WS; rANOER •• rwPNC H11A1C11 d Y001tlDS�1\ rAL•a out , w ANrCTCOTAHrrLO1 wA-1RM TLM.M•D• I GAL =WA1iR 1MLP /OLT MINCE POR w+lwaoc 1'OL. 'M W F r pa•T1.1 701 g f t'' Ce TO M RiTO.4C pMTlli Tc�E6TO OE ©1rAlDEP w,�' 9� — 1T►1NE rPY[ WANE frOEpD. �rALDa �" \ WPM( }1TA1DOt f�i - k' — — #111#[#1711#1 �rT .0 0 14111(Z 2"APLE pastes c0Dec maw TO I21112.2AN `\7•" •a it 0 2 WHL ,. IIOIIMO MIES IED i 0 D/• pM+flMTY TREE REMOVAL PLAN of a � X • \ X X DM X © X 713 EAS H ! FROM H4' L X X (1)T-AIC1 DAVDII Trip X X (I)T-AO1 iii•��/.�YaI,BALL.=maw• Ell �, �1T 17 ' EI v S�Y rlL1 i1�;• �1 W®,��`••. • I '1• $L1 PENCE RCA • 0....7 L • ( T- f•.. 2ROe4CH cancCl ' r � X eit c(f)i LAYN .Am I LAW I . 3 1:,'t .1LA ,�...y .+.+�r.1�AEr►y r(.' y,t 7J� IDIATtiti=We 11•19E6 • • All (32 t-Pr4 AN in®`�, 2•$r1AI'® ® 2.11NAAN(WAN NEI! a t FOR G..I.MC/IG.TION au,- lai r_*rte U. 'j". NEW TI IILATER IN. METER l�A EMC° D/'R ;Y .=A DSCAP PLAN l� i ; go g `/ a D DATE.MMMAT T.•/ DaAW0 ANDY 1CALL1••20• We..a• \ \ L1.1 AAam" CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS=7/12/2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 1999-00026 FILE TITLE: BANK OF PORTLAND APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Lee P.O. Box 847 General Contractor Portland, OR 97308 5210 SE 26th Avenue Attn: Pete Vrontakis Portland, OR 97205 Board Chairman PHONE/FAX: (503)393-1377 REQUEST: This proposal is the construction of a new 3,529 square foot two story office building with a ground floor footprint of 2,699 square feet. The proposed site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 acres) and was developed as a continuation of S.W. 69th Street (now 68th Parkway) right-of- way and later abandoned. The building is located along the northern property line and at the far west end of the narrow rectangular lot. The parking lot is located to the east of the building and is accessed off 68th Parkway by a one-way drive. Egress is by means of an easement from the motel to the north and returns to 68th Parkway. Due to its location within the area known as the Tigard Triangle, the project is subject to special design review under the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. There is an undesignated seasonal ditch at the far southeast corner of the site, which drains to the south off-site into Red Rock Creek according to the applicant. Prior land use applications related to this property for property line adjustments were approved under file nos. (MIS)1999-00022 and (MIS)1999-00023. LOCATION: The project is located east of 68th Parkway Street and south of State Highway 99W. This location is within an area known as the Tigard Triangle between State Highway 99W, State Highway 217 and Interstate Highway 5; WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot 06505. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial. ZONE: C-G; General Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.795, and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: March 21,2000 DUE: ApriI4,2000 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: [Tentatively] May11,2000 ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP © NARRATIVE © UTILITY PLANS © ARCHITECTUAL PLAN © SITE PLAN © LANDSCAPE PLAN © GRADING PLANS © OTHER (MISC.) STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 315 SDR1999-00026 BANK OF PORTLAND LAND USE PROPOSAL 4 ketika...,‘evi eavt,o4 1CW-cad :.11.0(°4) r4111111thmics011iji December 3, 1999 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman Bank of Salem P.O. Box 847 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Incompleteness letter as of 12/3/99 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: The City of Tigard received your application submittal for Site Development Review at property located at 1S136AD06505. After a preliminary review of the submittal items, Staff has determined that the following information or items are necessary before the / application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review: 1) Address the Site Development Review standards in Chapter 18.360. in narrative // application. —2) Provide property owner original signature/authorization for Land Use application. u 00a' 3) Provide gross area of parcels and percentage of lot coverage for new development. ,/ 4) Address Chapter 18.725, Environmental performance standards. Describe location and type of any noise sources. V 5) Confirm whether or not there are any existing easements on the subject parcels / exact- in this application and any easements on adjacent parcels that may be affected Loyal tt. Ro by th I proposed development. sh 00-6L(aP 6) Address fire truck access and minimum access width requirements. Show / proposed lighting plan. 7) Provide a Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan prepared by a certified arborist as required in Section 18.790.30 of the CDC. Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • ] 8) Provide public facilities plans including the following: Grading Plan (show existing and proposed contours and relationship to adjacent parcels and, Utility plan (showing Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage and Water Quality facilities, proposed water lines, existing and proposed fire hydrants). C9--)) Provide a vicinity plan with locations of buildings and structures on adjacent parcels and distances from the proposed building and subject property lines. 10) Show centerline of street clearly on plans. X1 .\/11) Please confirm project name. All cases in the computer must be tied to a project VA 1 P name. The Site Development Review case creates the project name for all other cases to be built from (Building and Engineering), therefore, it is very important that we have an accurate project name at this stage. While name changes may be permitted at a later date, there may be a fee charged to cover the administrative costs of making changes in our computer systems. Once the information listed above has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and schedule it for review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Sincerely, aren Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Way W. Lee, General Contractor 1999 Planning correspondence file SDR1999-00026 file I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26.doc • Page 2 of 2 m fP`Le, L at PI d is/3 �q FOR-/99f- CITY OF TIGARD vocrz� LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST •lease read his form careful) in con'unction with the notes •rovided to ou at the •re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: t'?armA 4 Date: l+ 111 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) d cL u.—� .t Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4"labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map /U14- 6/4111') ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan —A-lv ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map "19'� Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan , ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan' Pte`' Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan i dre Qe vutova.Q Site Development Plan 9.410"1_A 't Architectural Drawings 1 Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources Locations of existing structures and their uses Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting • ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site — ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location,size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces,decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines - ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location,size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • isl;curpinlmasters lrevisedlchklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 /�d cox e CODE CHAPTERS / 8w 18.330(Conditional Use) . 0((Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parkin/Loadin g Requirements) ) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 1 8.350(Planned Development) 1 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) `(Ylrtlew4. V-4.-- 18.780(Signs) ` 1 8.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 4 nu^r"' 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) �90 15fi rC�n7- `-- 18.370(Vanances/Adlustments) 18.715(Density Computations) `� X 18.790(Tree Removal) lvo p(llt K- 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) k/- 18.195(Visual Clearance Areas) . _ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 1 8.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) '"_ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) N"- 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot line Adjustments) -- 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) ',� \' 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) New -1rec f`e e(40--`" 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) A'b14i',+ rc( 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) B fr_4 -7(ree3 u/ , a"eV s! 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 1 8.760(Nonconforming Situations) IMPACT STUDY `7 eNVV�°e -1?-`'L4 r ck i'-'1 `‘-.(-)'to- rsS /e7Y1 4) 7r a/4 c ("/1- 1-“1( 4- 1 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Drrision Section PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST PrajeLe': • 1C. nF c :it....„,z, FOR Date: 121311 LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE DING EP Existing and proposed contours shown? lope Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes ❑No Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES Right-of-way clearly shown? Centerline of street clearly shown? Name of streets)shown? Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets Pc s P Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? El ❑ P Traffic study required/submitted? 3,4 Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? lir Check widths proposed on public streets Otiet Are private streets proposed? • under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? [Other: • ITARY SEWER ISSUES ❑ Existing/proposed lines? Stubs to adjacent parcels required? 'TER ISSUES ❑ Existing/ ro os lines? Existing/proposed fire hydrants? LC!RM DRAINAGE AND WATER •UALITY ISSUES IN Existing/proposed lines? (l Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? ❑ Water quality facility shown on plan? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? ❑ Stubs to adjacent properties required? ❑ Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? I:1englbrianAmasters\public facility plan checklist.doc U",9✓2e 1 e, /)/3h. \/ 14-) 7-/6 Ca . 4 / a) 0/d 1 4.-t 6) 54 s-y `- ' C ) t1 U/// he sa ini fed h Ecic - e ' (41"1-6r'''."4 Fie 1✓c a Ce-eyJ a - �u,�- 0/14-r .vt CA--ei/opt, �2 f. 01. /6 / `Pec,Z,z 7 /( e 12S 4_ P/6 _ _ _ mid Cct 7-eee /. 1 /�'lltC. ,zsc cP 4 of </isue-; 17) ya- - �Oo �,y,,� GU,// add f a r Cc,�-u-fi 6�� GZa.� „�� s 54414) n.t e a lv�u i �`{ 6) ,517ea--2,‘... - yl-c; fi fr ia-/-( I J t A • PLANNER APPLICATION COMPLET[ ESS GUIDE PRIOR TO FORWARDING FOR SET-UP ♦ Tidemark Project Data Entry (within 5 days of receipt) . Completeness/Incompleteness Letter (within 30 days of receipt) . When A Project Is Accepted As Complete And Forwarded To The Planning Secretary For File Set- Up, Please Verify That The Following Items Are Included: Land Use Proposal Description: (verify with check mark the materials submitted) ❑ File Number(s) ❑ Project Name O 120 Days (Count the day accepted as day one) o Applicant(s) Name and Address o Owner(s) Name and Address o Any Additional Parties to the Application you Want to Receive Notice (Rep./Attorney, Engineer/Consultant, etc.) o Description of the Proposed Project(s) ❑ Map(s) and Tax Lot(s) and their Corresponding Addresses o Applicable Review Criteria ❑ CIT Area—not"Citywide" unless application is for a CPA or ZOA (CIT area can be found in Permit* Plan-Parcel information) o Date of Public Hearing or Projected Date to Issue the Decision (Planner to set date/confirm with Hearings Officer/Planning Commission/City Council, if applicable) Request For Staff/Agency Comments Notification Sheet: ❑ Applicable (complete a check-off sheet to include agencies/staff you want to receive a notice) ❑ N/A DLCD Notice (CPA's/ZOA's): ❑ Applicable (complete Notice of"Proposed Amendment" NOW! Complete Notice of"Adoption" or"Withdrawal", as applicable) ❑ N/A Application Materials: (NOTE: this is a generic list only) ❑ Signed Land Use Application o Copy of Warranty or Deed to Verify Ownership ❑ Written Property Owner Authorization From ALL OWNERS if Applicant is NOT the Owner ❑ Narrative ❑ Appropriate Number of Materials for Request for Comments for ALL Hearing Bodies o Plans Folded to Approximately 8.5" x 11" ❑ 8.5" x 11" Reproducible Site Plan o Revised Plans Clearly Marked as Revised, Including Revision Dates (applicant is responsible for pulling/replacing/folding plan sheets in all sets of revised plans prior to application acceptance) ❑ LIST IN REPRODUCIBLE MAILING LABEL FORMAT Containing the Names and Addresses of All Property Owners Within 500'. If the Property Owner List is Not City Generated, Certification that the List Reflects All Property Owners Within 500 Feet of the Subject Site(s) is Required From the Agency that Generated the List ❑ 2 Sets of Self-Addressed (no return address), $0.33 Stamped #10 Envelopes. If Applicant is Using a Postage Meter, NO DATE is to be Printed on the Envelopes, Only Postage. ❑ Additional Materials Required in Pre-Application Notes Pre-Application Conference Notes And Materials: ❑ Applicable (Pull original from Planning Secretaries lateral file cabinet (bottom file drawer) by the Section Number) ❑ N/A i:\curpinlmasters\application completeness checklist 25-Aug-99 (Iti March 7, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman Bank of Salem P.O. Box 847 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Second Incompleteness letter as of 317/00 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: The City of Tigard received your application re-submittal for Site Development Review on February 10, 2000 for the property located at 1S136AD06505. After a preliminary review of the submittal items, Staff has determined that the following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review: 1) Provide preliminary sizing calculation of water quality facility. 2) Show water quality facility on plans. As there is an undesignated creek at the southeast corner of the site, you may be required to obtain an approval for your project from the Unified Sewerage Agency unless the project is deemed complete by March 15, 2000. Please submit the items above no later than March 10, 2000 to ensure adequate time for review prior to the USA deadline. Once the information listed above has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and schedule it for review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Sincerely, p aren Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Way W. Lee, General Contractor 5210 SE 26th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97205 Land Use Casefile: #SDR1999-00026 I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26inc2.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 4i'//lIIl 1J�\\ SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: Pete vror‘lak t Company: ‘36,40<_ o-F Ism k of. Poi et-).t Phone: 563. 3cj�- 13-17 Fax: 5c,3 _3q 3 13-I 7 From: 1<a re,,„ co, Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: 317 I Dp Pages including this page: ;. COMMENTS: 6-1'1A-) tx- C 0-01 ervt1 vyytut e--IN-e4-4 rc of 3 f 7 D -t2 t i1e ( actk ykccie- ,rite +0 r -f 1As2-1 'ttvo revvl tvx<<1a vvt 14-ev' -o lw - J J / u�ex_� -fua,t� day -1t� ►-vim ww� '�- �ckv� -� � o rDu�xc��'1 cke ry,o (0,e f-- City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** March 7, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman Bank of Salem P.O. Box 847 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Second Incompleteness letter as of 317100 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: The City of Tigard received your application re-submittal for Site Development Review on February 10, 2000 for the property located at 1S136AD06505. After a preliminary review of the submittal items, Staff has determined that the following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review: 1) Provide preliminary sizing calculation of water quality facility. 2) Show water quality facility on plans. As there is an undesignated creek at the southeast corner of the site, you may be required to obtain an approval for your project from the Unified Sewerage Agency unless the project is deemed complete by March 15, 2000. Please submit the items above no later than March 10, 2000 to ensure adequate time for review prior to the USA deadline. Once the information listed above has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and schedule it for review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Sincerely, aren Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Way W. Lee, General Contractor 5210 SE 26th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97205 Land Use Casefile: #SDR1999-00026 I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26inc2.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CR,.,.,KLIST Prof._ FOR Date: 31to t Zoom LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE G ING 07 Existing and proposed contours shown? Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes Lio a Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES [}. Right-of-way clearly shown? Centerline of street clearly shown? IName of street(s) shown? 0V" Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? [V Profiles of proposed streets \P Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? .1'x1P Traffic study required/submitted? a Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? B i Check widths proposed on public streets �'1/4 Are private streets proposed? El under 6 lot minimum? . ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ['Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES [� Existing/proposed lines? Elz Stubs to adjacent parcels required? N WATER ISSUES [] Existing/proposed lines? DV Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? II I_ Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? t1� t. quality facility shown on plan? � does area provided match calculations for size requirement? Stubs to adjacent properties required? N6 ,E1--+r Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:\eng\brianrlmasters\public facility plan checklist.doc A March 15, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman Bank of Salem P.O. Box 847 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Completeness letter as of 3/15100 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: The City of Tigard received your application re-submittal for Site Development Review on March 10, 2000 for the property located at 1S136AD06505. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete, and scheduled for review. Staff has identified a tentative target date of May 17, 2000. Please note that this is a target date only and that a decision may be issued before or after that date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Sincerely, `;Z4/ "ei/ ,r Karen Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Way W. Lee, General Contractor 5210 SE 26th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97205 Land Use Casefile: #SDR1999-00026 I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26acc.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 f A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall BA w mk Aid,/`C N 7223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 FEB 1 0 2000 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: CITY OF TIGARD DATE OF PRE-APP.: k!28\�°1 Property Address/Location(s): AIM.A-coo! J7 I 0 c s L),) ( fl p F�()� t l o FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 1 5 13J C Prf) 06505 Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Site Size: 7_/G X 39( 6i�c��4 Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (,-'R'41 t-0 • L G 47-L+- Conr�-���1 r c Date: Address: 5o2IO SE c.?6r41- .4 1'E Phone: A3clt_oc 'J City: Po(zy4A-0 ok Zip:97.2O Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: FM-1.)K_ 0 C- S(1-l-Ei^{ 11�� Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: P• 0 • 60//X 8 517 Phone: 503 -3 g3-13 7'7' city: Sal✓ I Q I� Zip: '730$ CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev. 11/26/98 IAcurpinVnasters\sdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY 0 Application Form Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site J3' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): IZI Construction of an office building Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ( 3529 square feet on two floors ) with Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/7"x 11") 2699 sf footprint . Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Also see narrative. Construction Cost Estimate ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$$/$10,000) 1 VAP-T1.: Pt'Y List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NONE APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 02 I day of OC f 0 8 Ere_ , 19—LL W Pi-ct t E E G EN i Co r Q,/ Aic b - 1 e // ride,(1 Own•is gnature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 1 CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 July 26 , 1999 Job 6016-1 Mr. Pete Vrontakis 1420 Rafael St. N Salem, OR 97303 Dear Pete: We visited TL 6505 on SW 69 Ave, just south of Carrows Restaurant on July 22 , 1999 . During our visit we inventoried the trees on the site, as it will be, after the double Property Line Adjustment, that is presently in progress. We found that there are 40 trees with a diameter of 12" in diameter or larger. During our visit we also noted that there were approximately 30-40 trees that were under 12" in diameter. If we can be of any further assistance please feel free to call on us. Respectfully, / Albert Hertel Corp. Sec. BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT EXHIBIT MAP FOR PETER VRONTAKIS IN LOTS 1 -3 AND TRACT B "WAY LEE' LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SEC. 36, R.1 S, 1W, W.M. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SCALE: 1"=30' JUNE 24, 1999 m 0 10 20 30 40 CICASWELL/ REGISTERED HERTEL PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS INC. LAND SURVEYOR 6120 AV S.W. LO OREGON 970 ,/aim 761.474-Z5_4d BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ( f� -1 (503) 644-3179 OREGON \ 18. LA LBERERT HERTEL 1896 EXPIRES 6/30/01 \ . \ y \ S89'45'56"E 5.73' s 'S0' ya �0 ate. G a,, 4> per. 0'(\1c9 O S ,9 .p t? 9� 9GF BK 1012 PG 172 02 R=285.00' 00 �`�cp L=22.20' �,s f A=04'27'49"• C=S26'47'16"E '9L `n0 (� 22.20' R=280.00'��r y as '■ ZG L=23.10' �� i=04'43'35" a0% ao TRACT B &. C=S26'39'23"E o <n.,.., F •_S i'' \ 23.09' � 00'14'04"E 1.74' 1--"---R=285.00' '• V1 L=3.58' y N89'46'01"E 5.49' A=00' 3'14" 44 4 "E 3.58' i 4 JOB NO. 6016-6 . ... ltv�r`.1•.n. Nt�coopteT.n.,, . • . , a ' TZT►TLG IN�URXN!"' CC' rei:1 Q4ECON" .:., _.. 4398 • e•....I.w-•s,c:: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESe PRESENTS, That PFLDCO INC., an Oregon Corporation �• i • corporation duty ord.rsis.d / i and seining under She 'awe of the Stales of ... O!agan , Imreins/t.r celled grantor. Sot the conaldeeefioA hereinallet stated, does hereby d W �� "• Y Leant,bargain.x11 and convey teem , WAY.y. Leis GLIRIAL Cp C2011, I1tC.. , an Oregon Corporation . hwteirwll.t called granter • i and granter's heirs. satctewrs and *saline. that certain real property. wills the lcrtoar'•I•. herellJtamanr• and aP- . ' Pwrtenanr+e rheretnta brhsndirsg or app.rtsinind• ./tualed in the County at leash Inxton ,and Stab of Otrgvn,deectibrdallolfows,to•wit: Exhibit "A'' Attached • /., i / • • . • I ^ Sub]act Co: St•tutocy prwera end a.aee.w nca of Unified Sewerage Agency; rtghtr of �. the public in and to any portion lying within the boundaries cf roads or highway{; . tr, Eaecment in Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Compeny rte^rdrd dune 11, 1940, book 190 page • 388; Easement to Portl.nd General Electric Company recorded March 16, 1959 book 415 peg* 308; and Limited acceaa and condition. set forth In decd from Stet. of Oregon Stets N:ghuer Commission to Dr. Hex A. Read, recorded May 3. 1967 look 640 pope 319, and 1 modified in Instrument recorded Dec. 3. 1975 Rook 1057 pegs 27. Waihinston County Records, • . .1 I • i l i.1 seas .o..4.4..Cutwi. COMBA/t 01146..44.,Ow sepia./ PIC To Have and to Hold the acme unto the acid grantee and grantees help, auece.avrs and assigns i . • And said grantor hereby covenants to and with said grantee and grantee's heirs, auiccee is and saeidmthat • 'pantos it lawfully seized in Ice simple d the above grantd pr.miaea,ire.from all encumb►anus Eieapt .for ,• f any liens or encua+berences muttered or Crert.ed•py.tocicract purchaser subaequene• to.• L.. f r••1 estatc contract dated Supi. 19, 1976. ,•■ et.tached. to. Asendment to contracr••re.• corded starch 24, 1975 book 1015 peg. 636, re-recorded April 9. 1975-Book 1017—page t 878 %•shtngcon County Records. • e • t and that grantor will warrant and forever delend the above • vented premises and every part and parcel tAetaol against tha lawful Claims and dem.nda of all nor rhoms0evef, Alvan to pertts fu all of contract except those Uaimin, under the above described •neumbrenus, 107.500.00 i The true and actual eenridrra►ion paid tnr this ~Wee, anted in term.et donate,is i , • " Ho..'aver, the actual consideration e.onaiatt of or includes other property Or value given or promised which it , par! Cl ,hr +tlotX>t> consideration (indicate whiehl•= ., ` n con.lrwng this dried and when (he contest w requires• the singular includes the plural. '• , . Done br order al Ih. gr•ntor's board of directors,wilJt lea«�corporate sa•1 affixed, ,. , . Irhea d/7 'r day of •aJy1 4 .e.(.C. ' , 19 '%ics ' ,:,y • )r ••• i (st,L) PPEDCO INC. • _ I President ' 8 y $egef cry ,Y i 7 ` r s rATr OF OREGON, 9 yr. r GauntYof '� .1..yyc��e.:-..«•a� s.: a:a. 19 . . , .. P.rwnally appeared , •4....761 .� /,.L/a..'..� and . ' t vi.o, being duly 'worn. each for hlmeell and not OM for Hie other, did say that the former is the . ••? _ _ president and that the latter is the �". ;•"' s.cr.rary of • a car 1• ' f porerian, ■red that the seal singed to the /ongoing instrument is the colpolate nat a/ said corporation and that said instrument was ' >,K„ni ern: >taiev .14 Lci,ail ul seep w:i..�..i.vl• L) --a...411 :.f 53::: .'Si.•. :..i; .^.L4 ..,:!::.t ::1;fr pekA010. . rand wed inalrvment to be its Ioluntarr art and deed. ��/ Before me: I ..I�1L1.t�/ V/4 +CS(.,s/ • (OuIu'L SCAT) Notary Public Inn Otr&e My commission esPirrs Lf1 !!Sr ' • Moot_.. .I.+... M'.N• ,.. ••■•••• •.II•.. •••I■••• ,••w• s•&....e. ir c6..r sale I w,+W P.1 1 WOO,YW.. i WARRANTY DEED STATE OF OREGON CORPORATION 1.a. ••- County of 1 • . .P.(f4fP ..lnc. ._. 1 :retell the, the ..ithn, iritru••1 .1.11ecatn Terrace mrnr wee rreei,rd lee r.rwd ne, the L.C" C•■—• a.., Oregon ;7034 I o.r Of , IV • i•••16.40 at o'clock M . and rtcOrdrel say_•.. Lt(..G..n,e•r41,..CugltaCLOr.,. c• ••a *"."—• In book on rage Qr •• 5210 I. E . 26th, ..a,--•.• Mina lee number . Ree• 44ji�ne„�S.aa�1� ,••0 Ned of Qrrd• of .aid Ce...rV die• wtcoap..4 aai,a.. ye WitMe?) ms' hare WW1 Hal ea 6 0 ..IL! INSURANCi :OMAPaN!1 Count,. atNaeJ • ....,012 S. w (�..C•, 1110^0 I Itavll C'.l. alr.e4.1 a•nn• i n o I. ATT�I CA I i 1�t:):r.ts 50 14.x'( (ALA 't�. rifle ' I Tea $t oiswMs c ten B) Arput+ . milOtl. We swelleel C+sevactar Inc, • Bank of Salem is a small business bank. It has an office in Salem and an office in Portland, DBA "Bank of Portland". bank of Portland would relocate to its own building in Tigard on this proposed site. The bank is a commercial lender. It does not have a drive-in or ATM's, and does not do consumer loans. On the average the Portland Branch makes five (5) large business or commercial real estate loans per month. We have three (3) full time employees and one parttime. Our traffic would compare with a single doctor dental office with 1.5 to 2 customers per hour. Our deposits come generally from certificates of deposit with maturities of 1 to 2 years. We usually see our depositors once or twice per year. For any questions please contact: Pete Vrontakis, Board Chairman, Bank of Salem 503-393-1377 (home phone) Narrative The following narrative provide finding based on the applicable approval standards of City of Tigard, Community Development Code The Site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 Acres.) The site was developed as a continuation of 69th Street right-of-way and later vacated. Approximate 4,256 square feet (.10 Acres) of abandon improvement exists today along with existing storm sewer. Our proposed project includes a new office building (3,529 square feet on two floors total) with 2,699 SF footprint. The building is located on the Northerly property line and as far to the west as permitted by ordinance. The design of building takes advantage of diagonal frontage (to the interior property lines) by employing a saw tooth concept to provide visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located to the East end to provide presence at the street without adversely effecting the light and air concerns. Access to the parking is buffered by a 10' landscape strip at the South property line to allow the existing Cedar tree row largely remain intact. The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16' is located at the rear of the proposed structure. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North and returns to SW 69th Street. 18.360 Site Development Review We comply with Street and Utility Standards as demonstrated below. We are not modifying Streets other than the addition of an in-only drive. We will add only 38 trips per day so virtually no impacted to traffic. We are going to relocate the existing sanitary sewer that currently runs diagonal across vacated right-of-way to be parallel. We will realign the sewer along the south line. This realignment will not cause the grade sewer to go below two percent. The sewer will be designed to comply with Chapter 18.810. The sewer realignment should respect the root ball of the Cedar tree row located at the south property line Criteria 2 Relation Ship to Physical Environment We comply with the requirements: good site planing complying with Chapter 18 J considering the natural environment site selection,( i.e. taking an existing poorly develop site and developing it well) Currently the site, a vacated street, is unkept and subject to dumping and other undesirable activities J By using a creative design we are improving an undesirable situation, and a difficult site to create to be an asset to the community. We are acting public interest and necessary for the promotion of the health, safety and welfare, convenience, comfort and prosperity for the citizens of Tigard by: 1 Implementing the City Tigard Comprehensive Plan and other approval standard in this title as demonstrated by this narrative and the balance of this proposal. We are proposing a use permitted by the Comprehensive Plan and other standards. 2 We are preserving natural beauties of the land and man made environment redeveloping a previously developed site and minimizing the impact on the balance of the undeveloped portion of the site. 3 We are improving the qualities and relationship between individual building and the physical development which contribute to the amenities and attractiveness of the area. 4 We are improving public and private development as they relate to each other and the neighborhood by repairing by a portion the fabric of the city long since neglected. 5 We are providing a quality environment of this development and the community at large The environment will be enhanced by: J We comply with the requirements of Section 18.745 and 18.620.080 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. J The parking lot is screen from SW 69th Street by the mass of the proposed building. J We are providing two (2) street trees of 2 1/2" caliper on our 56' frontage. The Building is: 1 Located to preserve the existing trees, topography and natural drainage as stated above. 2 Located in area not subject to ground Slumping or Sliding the building is built on the improved portion of a vacated Street. This is prima-facie evidence movement has not occurred in recent years where has occurred elsewhere 3 Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings adequate light, air, circulation and fire-fighting ❑ It complies with U.B.C. Chapter 12 ❑ It complies Chapter 18.705 • It complies UFC Section 902 4. Oriented to optimize relationship for wind and sun. Trees have been preserved to the extent possible. Criteria 3 Not applicable Criteria 4 Buffering We comply with Section 18.745.050 and Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 as demonstrated on the Landscape Plan. The Buffer yards are as follows: West none required (between CG Zone and an Arterial) North none required (between CG Zone and CG Zone) East a 140 existing trees and vegetation will be maintain South 10 required between Parking lot/ Parking lot access and the existing residence (in a commercial zone.) The existing row of Cedar trees will be maintained. In addition a 6' sight obscuring fence will be added on the south property line to extent permitted by Chapter 18.795 and maintaining the health of the row of Cedar trees. The actual building is set back 31 feet (10' buffer plus 16'vehicular access plus 5' pedestrian walk way.) The pedestrian walkway could be located on the south side of 16'vehicular access except crossing the16'vehicular circulation with pedestrian circulation is not well advised for obvious reasons. Criteria 5 Not applicable Criteria 6 Not applicable Criteria 7 Not applicable Criteria 8 Not applicable Criteria 9 Demarcation of public, Semi-public and Private Space for Crime prevention We have no need for private space in this proposal. The Public and the Semi-Public Space is clearly delineated by: ❑ Narrow character of the site itself. ❑ The location of the building, at the street, complies with the Transportation Rule (which encourages the use of public transportation) Y The narrow access at the south property line delineates the Public (at the Street) from the Semi Public (parking at the rear) will assist in crime prevention. This juxtaposition is the visual clue that will reinforce the limits of the public's space. Criteria 10 Crime Prevention and Safety Windows and Doors have been located in view of the public. Down lighting are in the soffits to enhance security and reduce glare into adjacent sites. The parking lot is illumination is by means of 400 watt metal halide (for light color quality) pole mounted shoe-box type. A shoe-box fixture will direct the light down to reduce glare. Criteria 11 Public Transit The location of the building, near the street, complies with the Transportation Rule (which encourages the use of public transportation.) There is a bus stop (shelter nearby on the opposite side of street.) An accessible route from the right-of-way to the entrance. The down lighting in the soffits enhance security and illuminate the path. Criteria 12 Landscaping Our landscaping complies with chapter 18.100. Additionally, over 47 percent will be green space, where the code requires only 15 percent. At the rear of the property, 36 percent of site, the indigenous plant material will remain largely intact. Of the developed portion of the site (14,448 square feet) 26 percent of the site (3,781 SF) is landscaped. u We are retaining over 75 percent of existing trees over 12" Caliper. By adding new trees (i.e. Street trees and Parking lot trees) Criteria 13 Drainage All drainage will comply with 1981 master drainage plan as illustrated on the Grading plan and addressed in impact study below. Criteria 14 Accessibility This plan is intended to satisfy ORS Chapter 447, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1992 (as published in the Federal Register July 26,1991 ) Section 4.3.11 and Chapterl 1 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code 1998 edition (OSSC). The grading plan illustrates these intentions. Criteria 15 Zoning This proposal complies with the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone as illustrated on the submittals and enclosed narrative. 18.620 Triangle Design Standards We comply with the requirement s of Section 18.620 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. The design of building takes advantage of diagonal frontage (to the interior property lines) by employing a saw tooth concept to provide visual relief and interest. The second story of the building is located to the East end to provide presents at the street without adversely effecting the light and air concerns at the Right-of-way. Fifty percent of the ground floor wall length, facing the street is window. The base of the building is brick veneer, and the upper portion is horizontal lap siding. The roofing will be an Architectural Composition. All roof mounted equipment (if any) will be obscured from view. 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16'. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North and returns to SW 69th Street. Evidence of this access easement is enclosed herein. Pedestrian access is by means of a sidewalk immediately South of the proposed building. This access shall not exceed 1 :20 slope. 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards There will be no Noise, Visible emissions, vibration, odors, glare or heat from this project other that normally anticipated from an office building. 18.730 Exception to Development None requested. 18.745 Landscaping We comply with the requirement s of Section 18.745 and 18.620.080 as demonstrated on accompanying documents and as stated below. The parking lot is screen from SW 69th Street by the mass of the proposed building. We are providing two(2) street trees of 2 1/2" caliper on our 56' frontage. 18.755 Mixed Waste and Recycling Storage A refuse and recycling enclosure is provided at the East end of Parking lot. This enclosure will comply with the Franchise hauler requirements. 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements The Use of the building is office (Table 18.765.2) is 2.7 Spaces per 1 ,000 SF minimum and 3.9 spaces per 1 ,000 SF. 3.529k SF Building x 2.7 = 9.52 minimum parking required 3.529k SF Building x 3.9 = 13.76 maximum parking required We are providing 11 full sized (9'x18.5') and one accessible space. With appropriate maneuvering aisle (figure 18.765.1 .) The parking lot is accessed off SW 69th Street by a one-way drive of 16'. Egress from the parking lot is by means of an easement from the Motel to North No Load Zone is provided, as the building is fewer than 10,000 Square feet. A 10' buffer is provided on the south side of the parking Two bicycle spaces will be provided near the front door (covered parking) entry. 18.780 Signs Signs are as indicated on Site and Sign Plans. They are existing signs, to be moved from the current location. The signs are internally illuminated. The freestanding sign is 15' in height and contains 40SF reading: "Bank of Portland." A second sign mounted on the North side of Building (15'x3') also reading: "Bank of Portland." n , 18.790 Tree Removal We are retaining over 75 percent of existing trees over 12' in caliper, according to Section 18.709.030 (B)d no mitigation is required. Existing trees will be protected by being outside of area work and beyond silt fence. New trees (i.e. Street trees and Parking lot trees) will be protected by being located beyond concrete curbs. This will protect trees from damage due to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas Our drive is an in only driveway. The vision clearance required (30'x30') is demonstrated on the Site plan. It should be noted the adjacent site, through which we are exiting the parking lot also has 30'x 30' vision clearance area. Impact Study Based on a proposed Square footage of 3,529 and ITE code of 710 (Institute of Traffic Engineers, 6th edition ISBN 0-93540309-11 ) 16.58 trips per day, per thousand Gross Leasable Area (GSA,) can be expected to be generated approximately additional 59 average weekday trips can be anticipated. The average weekday trip rate can be modified by .65 trip length and a 1 .0 Link trip the actual average trip per day can be expressed in the following formula: average [3.529 (1000sf) x 16.58= 58.51] x .65 trip length factor } 38.03Adjust for trip length X 1 .0 Linked trip factor 38.00 total average trips per day The Site is approximately 22,188 square feet (.51 Acres.) The site was developed as a continuation of 69th Street right-of-way and later vacated. Approximate 4,256 square feet (.10 Acres) of abandon improvement exists today along with existing storm sewer. Our proposed project include a new office building (3,529 square feet on two floors total) with 2,699 SF footprint. And an additional 7,597 square feet of Parking and other impervious surface. The net increase in impervious surface is 6,040 feet. Based on the following assumptions: 1 . 50 year Storm 2. The difference of discharge between pervious and Impervious area We will add approximately 100.50 cubic feet of storage to assure .30 cfs/acre. This will be accomplished by mean of surface detention basin and if required a bioswale Water and Sewer We anticipate the water consumption for domestic use to be approximately 300 cubic feet, per month, year around. We further anticipate the water consumption during the irrigation months to be as high as 2450 cubic feet at peak. Further Impact We anticipate no further impact than noted above. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 3529 sq ft x $60.00= $211,740.00 utility connections, fees, sewer and storm relocation, landscaping, architectural fees, paving and miscellaneous $100,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $311,740.00 Bank of Salem P. C. Vrontakis Board`Chairman 503-393-1377 (home) FROM : CASI•IELL.✓HERTEL-EAGLE GPS PHONE NO. : 503 644 31.90 F . 01. 2000 11:34AM P2 • - • - • - - • WM - • - - • - - • - - • - - • - - DER • %Minn leS' I2iRON PIPE • -PL- - • - - , - - • - S • - - • - S • - mom er • REVISIONS& 8/25/99 MOVED SOUTH P/L 5' TO SOUTH AS PER TITLE COMPANY 2/1/00 ADDED DITCH AND CREEK CENTERUNE 0 SE COR. II LY�I1ud1' GAt, T n ,,, 40OUJ W/ SNOEBOX FIXTURES a ON 2S' SQUARE TUBE POLE I 4200 111 0 Li.04 0 j 5800-Ap se 340 it + 25-81 , IC.I f•.IIS:3l S: _ •I ' 43C0 4301 j• 41E r - --- .-- I 0 um . t° se-14 - ti _I it is ,„ W• Z %\`C' • I 630 6504 1 \?\ • - 1 l.�//�. _ ; Q _ © TF •. `�• • m n �m 1,S THOMAS srCTT L,LC ss�, o• 6507 • r.71 At . ;t.r S ....• 6503 ` 'f( •,• , .. 1.31 4 t 3 li . . 6506 2 i e , „. 97 .. W �, A Y .i / w• vco tx*. •`,/ * nR\,L� ? / c,.4._ _(0-137+4t4.. ••1'.1.11'• �. o __T • 1 SEE MAP LS I 35DA • 'l (, THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR'THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTINO LN LOCATINO SAID PREMISES,AND THE 111 COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABKL.TY FOR VARIATIONS,IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS.AREAS,AND LOCATIONS AI e trrcT,IVFfl fly A,71.f.1 CI'D.TV A1Pk4T. SE I/4 NE1,4 SECTION 36 T1$ RIW YIiI& w 7qa coy.Tr oneww 1$I 3 ilV r acc r•r(La,w y� ►e M1gtl _ji ..i ...�, ary....IOna....., JJ II 1^ 41 ill too, Ism) • .. ....,'o_•_ ......%........� .. 7i°• is ' .4, Iced` • c00" r �iTREL"T.... yj 1 • a a V } I I �°L • 0 s 'A `" w ' °• • 4 I fop+� 4 , _ .., • .PO. 7tpp 4 t 1 1 • m �� •loo t u. ,• • R If Io 7°' D . l ` e l L• 11 2 er N ` 2,r.r+•+ MO t fe0° e0 •f r ____E. ;• I tkq 1700 Ifeb' 04•. ill!It%. . • • Bolt 0111, f ^ 2pv 1 r y �— I �� OI �t 3111 Ji•. + . fj 1�� ■ • 1 ID , M rr -' Gaol _ II Gr•r .• 1 S W Plhl STREET 1; ;,:.r .. 7v.: Olt - om.—.., .� c C lire 31334> >•O a. 111::: •I.iO '.1..,..• r • r� p 7 1.a tli ,lava i .1.‘• . %fpf .. Sj t•' W I was • v ..• • , i'1 1 r �°C •• W / , 1! M + ■ 4110Q : t A1 1 Q 1 i G.–7,14-..."— ■•k‘ • to 7.' , ` = L °' 0 ,0. 11 __ , il ...:7; .-;° s•'' !� �Ia•Lwua�1 W.i+ �w1 N•'.Lff•oL L ....1. .001 .. G� ••m . .+� tiler J\J t t 41 Z 4.■i.s.O• , � 1 f I / s� u A Y i •C 11114 On .wa.r, o,►. L E E - �t-. s.tr 0+ rw w arw.e¢ • • •1 V°. •—'t- — .- 16A R THIS MAP is PROVIDED AS A COURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises, and the Company assumes —011— no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions, areas, and locations ascertained by actual survey. CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 AUGUST 25, 1999 JOB No. 6016-3 PETER VRONTAKIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT AFTER PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT A TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF TRACT "B" AND PART OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AND A PART OF THE VACATED PORTION OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE, ALL OF PARCEL 2 AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 80-27388 , WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, AND A PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, THE BOUNDARY OF WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A 2 INCH IRON PIPE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE"; THENCE N89°49 '46"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 , 188 . 59 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT NUMBER 80-27388; THENCE N89°46 '01"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND SAID BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, 172 . 25 ' TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 85043572; THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT 23 . 10 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "COOPER CONSULTANTS" , SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 280. 00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°43 '35" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N26°39 '23"W 23.09 FEET; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 56. 62 FEET; THENCE S89°45 '56"E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "B" , 107 .84 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE S00°38 '07"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 2, 13 . 66 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING N00°38 '07"E 51 . 34 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S89°49 '46"E 290.74 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S00°03 '44"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 3; 56 . 34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 22, 590 SQUARE FEET OR 0 . 519 ACRES, MORE OR LESS . BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT . , e• ..- 1 . . b• CI' • , . . • • • '' 0 i , . ■: . , ' '4 I.'; •• , ,' ' ... dfre \ • .....••••C ..... •. '.3 . ' ib.'' . •0 1 0;;\\ e"- ....5-.\ IN . , " • ! o• \ . , 1 ..• .,k ,",,,oesoego, ...,.. 4r1 . 0 . ; NJ ...41 a .•., : ...4 : 4.\\ , t . t \ i ,'• ici ' ' : . I ie. . ; ; , .... , , 1 , . , ..,, . 1 t . i , • 1-------r----1 ro.,.._. I Cal 4 4114 1 i , ; • , •• i i 1 1. 1 , ; • i • , , 15• 1 i 1 ... 4 i I . 1 Era i i VW 1 : ' I : .' i • 1 1 . ., _ i I I 1 ' En ; , 1 1 • . *I i . I , __... . _..... .___ • ___ - ----- 3 • imp. IMMO •• UMM• . MIMS .....pi.— • •—• , ....... ...—. , ...., — • pima moo . AIM. ol N00'4000*E 51.31' •,Aft... •, ' A ' 1 28.01` I '-.." °I • - .. ITI R \,, i // • ' i le.i• ...8..,\ c4 I fun : rn °V • C1/414 i . 2 . . ...v. .„. • . r i .‘,. . o . . 4 E\Lii-s•- : I • . ..11 1,1 r------ I • ''A-.\ 1•I'l 1-1 • : iA21„ 11 :'. iPi ;.. - :-113. • 38.20' .•'' no Lt ..\ 1 . .-- . . .... , , P gt-i za, 3T-caziczaz3mc?etK59€3,g3. En * t,g • ,-• ! • W OP DECtD. ISMS AND 13 US I R .41, . 1 1 . 1 i ' II I PA Op: kn ET 66. £2 r led 069 31.9:1381313H/173M.9c0 06T07090 DATE: ,,// PLANS CHECK NO.: 7/011 PROD T EC TITLE. 7-cmAr-re, -Ockit COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 • INDUSTRIAL $193.00 ▪ INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK < CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: _ BANCROFT OCCUPANCYY NOTE) LAND USE�ATEGORY USE OF WEEKDAY� AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP BASIS: o I� q 3159 s3 ,�+ atm , f3 A, t1)4e le r m na.4-10. F d �_!e.`y -�- _L T CALCULATIONS: X4 �r�� 9�S;s 14.74'x+ '0h X ?OX . 1 /1f Ilo , 31 3, S 3 X i8� /e‘e PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 51. J- p I 1 v L i 16,11i2.8 0 FEE: 1-7_, �fl, 5ga . 8 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: , -r-, T'v On 11 ROAD AMT.: OCS t`444 Ufe f' {`lLYA O trit..14- TRANSIT ‘1, / 5 AMT.:Q 3 PREPAR D B 8 5•+ 617/99 1:Whared\plug\wpsharelscottkVit\procedures manuat\worksheet 99-0O.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK � (97) AS PER THE PLAT "WAY LE-E" ,, .,, c •/ 06- r I NW CORNER co 1'- LOT 3 "WAY LEE" a FD 5/8"IR w p NO CAP ., HELD-[PLAT] p-)d 0 0) FD 5/8"IR oa) W/YPC INSCRIBED z 1 • "COOPER CONSULTANTS' 1 HELD-[SN 221111 E t DOCUMENT 98077352 L 0 T 2 i.0 L A Y M „ w 6 M , \ 6 17 rn BK 883 PG 833 i- \ -z-,.., EXISTING 1.39 ACRES n -. 6'6,\\ PROPOSED 1.30 ACRES a w o . ao O to i N Ki ao °' co r") voo z x O N �� app 0-70 `� S89'45'56"E 107.84' / 22 ti S9�F0 \ 102.11' 0) y \ D 2 '� o PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE (290.76'=SN 16452) �t 5.73' �o �9�'p� -�---_ M S89'49'46"E 290.74' ZG -5o N' 3, /o N 0 • 9 v D c3` °' etc EXISTING -� 5.00' STREET cS 4. EXISTING PROPERTY c° , a DEDICATION �° s BK 1127 PG 044 A, °0 c,, PROPERTY LINE o I & PARCEL 2 DOCU 80-27388 T, NI- (1:1)/ PC 4 ED 5/8"IR �� �� - LINE o I Z EXISTING 0.38 ACRES vii Y INSCRIBED 3 PROPOSED 0.52 ACRES co 4 COOPER CONSULTANTS" HELD-[SN 221 11] I �- • P TRACT B v L)FD 5/8"IR FD 5/8"IR z II '� l r I NO-CAP NO-CAP a,n DOCU ,--- �� � ,o,___ i NOb'38'07"W 1.36' HELD PI ] • N, (0 850435,? i D�. •-z--+ 66.71' -_ �. • [PLAT] 101.57' [PLAT] o o o°° 188.63'=PLAT (474.1 i --- BK 1012 PG 172 • N89'45.56"W 168.28' (168.30'=PLAT) --_- lo z� ( 188.59' ) i 47 N89'46'01"W 172.25' - _ co FD 5/8"IR cow N89'49'46"W 662.82' /'`� ti � NO-CAP (662.78'=PLAT) -INITIAL POINT DETAIL I I T -- HELD-[PLAT] 14 FD 5/8"IR FD 5/8"IR "WAY LEE" SCALE. 1'-10' NO-CAP NO-CAP \-) FD 2" IP WITH HELD [PLAT] HELD [PLAT] 3/4" IP INSIDE HELD-[PLAT] 5',\ �Ci'\--/:'-1:.5 0 MIS TRACT B o 4Iz D O /�, R=280.00' n R=221.00' A R=285.00 ® R=285.00 t`.• S00'14'04"E i L= 23.10' _ L= 15.95' L= 22.20' L= 3.58' A=04'43'35" A=00'43'14" (26) 1.74' i p=04'08'09" p=04'27'49" CHRD= 23.09' CHRD= 15.95' CHRD= 22.20' CHRD=3.58' D(N! 4 I BRG= N26'39'23"W BRG= S70'23.02"E BRG= N26'47'16"W BRG= S24'11'44"E .00' % i I"W N89'46'01"W 1.49' `S kif+Tr� ________..._-_..m.---___ - -- Lw k sn� __ - I '..-4...,•. ..••.•1 z K �<ISTINC SEWER ' AC ' _� L., r. .• .INE J .x 44 4: ••'' ` --304----'---:.-----t• --5. eD a— ti r, j ;f :'t: ' 1 U IUD IAA\v/AUK 43,..,.." t, .. 1` ' 6'�A �� 1...q_____ I ► Ill 0 Rte' r"` r w+u* ur.r e .iP ' "3c,4���'� ABANDON SEWER LINE r . •� ao �_ .. .t :�� ••••,..,,t,r•..MAPLE -�-- �� ,' ' [� �� " ` -� A t,CB#2 CURB : _ ��_1_ � - - ▪ � ,``�. ? #1.. --------- --_ Ni?' \ ,b f�_ �tiwt v*> - 3:,,•i+c. �'_—__ ID .Il �� �' 1 I 1�af- wU— • '� Cam`- ' .+ 1154 *_ - - . - 1 f> �i.f> ,�. ?{A^ ; '�/ E y j4 �' �,.,y/�//� //�JI�.4'.'a./� 'IJO2• -, ' --:-2%- �m s''..- \ '- ;__ __ 'qs._p' .all`- ,? .y r,: Y —+•`�,. / / '1 , ��J -,-/".•04,7,.J J`'4�..w S RIP P RFT. ��T1k Q� y • �, ��.. f `"'tee r k,r' ��/.•j// Y.7j�'. L/ s-�y„':x'4 9 id'r'• =s C • 3i i it / • /' / ..'` .� �, :' lif T?9• V/%y -'/:• �/I293 o �AN�i " f !, `r!f I� ��ia;///;�/G'{�,� , t; . 7 primp �.. .sltr r, / ;,'flea\� •� �'�' /iiil ftty 291- ,/- .ik /O// 1/��i�/i =i iiil Zvi -�'` t i sv ��.r . it 1. / � ,:',1c- • -• ��- fi A ' 290 ...... w ii/" v: FI.LpLt�L�• NE � :�. r* �O, '�. - ,6c" °( ud ..- !j���y ';•� Y il. 'ii';j%/%!%I�trS�,1 - I n, +- �. M� r �9yGt �4j �f/ , I �7y� `���, �+ ?�� q: ...980 "f _ - — — — . — 0 �L y/ / /��/, , a .. 5 /��jv �1 ' / " ///% ' G %�� x �I 'fC e _ -I �. 4 • MAN HOLE `� i fili_,�! -- ' ID_ NE 8 S _ '-_.;).7.°Z.• I" -- rn • e)• !' :<, '��f%.� / /% �� �9 OUTLET STRUCTURE } • �►\a� li - r # N X40,''//ii%'-. 47 a r////%�I%%%4.' i,3 A /'' / % s SEE DETAIL '�� , 7,..., _5,1,w,.7 .._ .; �. . _ _ / l i - OPLO T KEY STQNE CENTERLINE OF i \ :I �,' 4 ri .1.." -'�. ' � o aay.r• ty. � i�//// /../,/, /%i' 291.00 \"` \Q a�- }. TING DITCH 4. • P\ . • -WM-�. ` .r r �__ PP W UG 5 $.•IRON ROD . .w, S89°�'1�+E �SS.6.3'\ � ��Q�' '<� ��589°49'10"E 172.25j;• E M ���r -, /�\ \ - : I/I /1//i ... '-• - S V sr, F,g1 \ ^ \ _ �— '60 20"MAPLE. .— 1.1:,:‘4-:.44.gj- •S, -�-X ` S4 �v r a ASP ALT Irk I • DRIVEWAY _ ` FENCE- KEYNOTES: • .':,:: o N OI REGRADE:4ND CLEAN DITCI{TO EAST WHERE p +� r4 • • I �,IT CONNECTS TO EXISTING SEASONAL DITCH ®t :� •MHf�4 \ 8 t';'., ' 'k, NEAR THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. A tn , r (-- iE . S: s.. D / AC \`1 )> f �� \ GRADAN:G. -- AND vfi,.,I I' 1 �t ,� •1'K v'•'v4 �•N r i r' r'4 Q C 1 ,' ! S' 1,,{kk'J!j 4ES 12/31/00 Pi: s4 1 4:: .EWIS,& VAN VLEET INC. !NV . 41 d�.•4,-,� 'r •?" %.4'::R1 -/ ITING ENGINEERS - _Its1 �. A V A `tJVV I Y.)V1 \' p U # W B5 h 105 I © o_ o Z• 2 8 5 I` z° — — g 102 a w 5 n ' 0 2° 3 89°50.E _ — _ _1io © '/I '1 / - 283.0 O / 1 CO w66� 10 "21 64 C ..,1 c 4,.,• �p 45 14 s95-9‘ ® 35 30 I 1004 p 41 _ — 4100 _ _ 2 N 2 1" 0 °� • W 2 8 5 .57Ac. �°m Y�` °Z�E 90 9`� 1 547°21 `yep z 0 630 ory 4, 6504 Iwy11 6.49■ o _ w ( . x ...... ti _M. ( W 0J° T. 6-I00°' ° O I r, 1� °� c� 25P bye I 4. 5 IA / ` by 30 1 i _.� eIA' 2°G N 89°20 E 29396 __ _ _ o • ,_-SOUTHIt LINE THOR 14, 0.83 s `G\ A.�z 0 1z° 6507 �s3 05 2.79 AC. / 0 404 o Q P e°o °oA N n 6503 / 0 en =� . ' . u 1.59A c. 3 rte. It 4 01 6506 ° W f ./5 Ac. a O F.,0#: 1-,� Y s 25 o o 6502 2 ~0 /.49 .7,a 3t m ` . 11 0 I a� �f��A r� `t N /� V IV gn �, 01 z oi .W� FN -.9' • �©i-f1 •sgN� IARys____ i -f ,'.7 c i1•I '' s6'(767° -66b/205 .>//5 /1 9 7/L j " 1 1 1 V waudogmea iw uoo fsf svt c.., 07 S/ u"4.6(k t'os 1" sA , - e4,tr.I. t.�,1, — 350 r, t tss a# 17. ,. 0,10 04--'''-....., '""' '',''' I!:" f.' - 1 A tWtir mss. t�` . f � 4%14 ;Iix. , '' j'' 'Irf r A. H'y''4�. t rte: ' r. ,n 1 r ,, $ • r IA x ,...,..,"„,, ...,itioppie, : ,, -' 4, ,... *k.,,..t..,... „, . , .,'#4 '' J--fr.,...;; ..t-IttoOtt..:,.. .'.. Illk a oro." 4, 0 * " I' x -'a.. 'fix A. I etifilr • s N. 01444 04001 !, {k „, 0... ...." ''''' ,'-'':::•:..,::;'.: •` w a b ' �a .e � t � R • { 4e s. • . ity Development 3 �SD — ,4_1 �e./Si . &/} � o6j • i- - PROW': PETE VRONTAKIS PFD NO. : 3531377 Mar. 10 2800 11:29gm p3 Fi J11 : ORSGELL/HERTEL–cAGLE ID-CNE NO. : 503 644 31% Feb. 01 2800 1::3441 P2 • 1 �.. fir• . .r- w , owes — • .� — . r. ter. • • Im— • — w+ • • 1/ Rc DER GRApe a CLEM 64 sT N6 I. OITU& To ORlt}( J T_mil 5 FASO NI L t(TG44 I74010" 1138.634 —J PIPE . . . +.. .... • w .rte . ■ mom . -mkm. I l NS. 8/25/99 MOVED SOUTH P/L S• TO SOUTH AS PER 1TLE COMPANY 2/ AO ADDED DTCH AN CRCEX CENTERLINE • SE con. • , . EASEMENT FROM 4 DAM 0...11.00 • HOTEL *W.WO \‘.V. ...., ,... ../.::. ....,, 1). ‘) 1 t .........Z.19.1"...ls:•41 a,■••••V.....i.' a 4 11.........1111.a..•WK. V '4\ . 7\4 +.1kli:.-%.,'*.\1=21'. i I .' -- i BUILDING SUMMARY ‘* t IlikV. ..\ M ''PROP OSED—'12111111PITA .". " '''-: ' IIIIIIPPIIIIII 6 ii- RS •I I , \-Villimls I Is ig li IcittirEgag1111 \ ...,.f.••\ .::::\ 1/4 •... ...• VTEPLAN M.I010.3t,bmnr.m. .4.41./...0....,...06 O.. P. 13 ..... . , , 1 a M D , •7: 1 ik • "-.-:= ....... - ,.7.4,...._ 0 ..... ..0.11010 M 0 ,s../4".• ,..: !I re.: 1.: .. • 1 b .• W(12.A Y I .., •sa• '.11 , :,,,,.:4,. .: _ .. L— .... Inli, iwie ..... 74.it.,. .1. .......,.....-4=wai.74.7,,„".....F.,....-..-...=.74.. 4. kna.tnosta.z..i...,...... VICOMITY MAP ()SIGN DETAL .... — 2 i-- -..,...--,:iiii_ . • -__. , . ..- -.... .- -'.--.. .. II• .1 -quill •.. . 171 0 2 iia po _ - .. - . - e----' = M W •_ C.._ lb- x - WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH ......41r.. A1.1 t RECEIVED PLANNING - FEB 1 0 2000 CITY OF TIGARD AC .. , /"... AC --j ••2 CL,--, ' 1 0"MAPLE 10'MAPLE LP BUMP° 0 \ ,2 mAPLE 0 0 * 6 emAPLE c,- = 2 cc = r, ...x c•C(P6\ CURB 2z . ,Lifti L tii ... CURB ---c,, • .... - AC f II, :# ., s W it . . AC co - • AC 0.5 te . .........„.....-EXISTING SEUJ b EIR ,- 8' .1 Ac F1 LINE - - -,D _,...... P 0 I 6 MAPLE EApEMEN74,7, FROM i! 0) A, 13 ..-. OD ABANDON SEWER LINE ..!}'C HOT-OIL li I: CE312 3 o riDECO S‘x Cgi ,,,,,,,,,. ' ,) ; t.3 \\\\N /:t I W'x'/..:-joRoposED s 8 . TOP OF KEY STONE , FENCE ANO CATE S89'w44L0f 2299067°59. -------------, BUILDIN ' " !--- , 0\ •— ei„ ,/,...,, ,,,, G , ims, - ----- ,, \ i. 0\ ‘ , •12 , ; INisi:igoF)..p913m7,clo — IF_ • ''''' il • °'S'c' _0 . 00 , \\\ .` I■ 'Pi, 0,"a(tESA24,C*41telLE IR' - ' -.17-..7.- ''...* pli"' Illree: c• Nog . 00 - -,--- - r I -,-,- ; 11111r --Joo• v, •••. I , . Ce#2 1 OVERFLOw • . lit '\ \ ik6,06 00 ,. IBM off ... \ 1111 --2 & o REC•NST-. RCIBM 129 50 RIM 2'2.5,4 i 293 00' %I:A wa....71 /'• '"I CP MAN HOLE INV -0 00 ..) NV 2.9.0 7 giETNcTHERLiNE OF 1.?.oF co; -- -1-*_. '',•'i',/ .; v.', , a 7 UM ... 007 saw inn ,:.. EX-I TVNL31 .EL06.--- ire - wilik. • • 01--------RIP-RAP TO ".a.-'''''' ItIlEALUN 14_____OLE l'F, 1.9tCti .46c)° ig (_, .. . NEW ETAIINE •J0 s_ 0 DAYLIGHT •' \ 298.00' F.Grill"" T"Tri---- ----,N N. \ No. ..- k ..,,4 297.Q. ...... • ; NEW--- WPILISA.....--_ ...- . - P iga ii...11; ... UER LINE • .02 • I I. ,,, 0. .r.. ..-.. 18 •-• 40?) I - * *1,7n) 8 MAN I-VOLE rErtolia-__ -.:EI,_ . N 4 93 O6 `Air ' 1-''' r19:3 TOP OF KEYSTONE ALL AT 291.w _ *it **1.01—*---7- s '--- -'4'''' :PP W UC wan.* .14- -:........ ...,......,-- 8874910E 18863 5 6-RON ROD • . \)A,,_ _ : ffro P‘.•\',„ ,„•4 4.:, , 1.1; :• • '9 " 11,, ; 4D \-- •-- ' /' \\ •\. A , 41/4. \ \ •\ \ e. . - - - to' A ' • \ I \ 20-MAPLE \ •i§■ \ • ASPtALT . P • DRNEWAY .,..-"‘...., ! ace • .... • .l IN Y.414#4 GRADG AND DRAINAGE PLAN FENCE--.....N ,-- !°-.1 AC l 07 IL, ...1 W 0: ... IC Z§ v/V. 1 3•C• RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE it\ W 03e MO 10 OM 1 RICHT-OF-WAY LINE it I II • j -''-i c Cr), o- ® c,--, v u:Y". f ® .r . c C iN .., • •-• -o ......u C ..,e. IN ._—... 1 . r.-.4-.7:::.' _T93' r I- • »a.o,.+.on 1=j 1-11=11A y • NOM I nnnu_II• 0, IRRIGATYON SYMe/_: Dv GS tip TREE PLAN TIN; - VERTICAL STAKES t_ EASEM= FROM i•Lw'LIT 11 UT.. Y t � MNM,Y Y• X c4 x •.R ..r•u .. iii 3F] •Vicallikkoi .. 4' O � 'TREE REMOVAL OV ;L PLAN '�of ce \ r x 0/.. 0 EASE : r FROM © H* i L t x n„rows ��� x tfl. lift cp \rt*14.— fa s •1 I i '" I �� ._ J` ` .r .n Ir.t.r__ :: 1::.'.ts:sL:..L 1.7-1r, -.••••• =4 Cam+ L ...a.-...�.Y� —=....._.,.•..,- - :•.._,:. A.-AI►..R/1►J/ 1';p. 0. i tz. \ �• LANDSCAPE PLAN < ) w al. L1.1 r SE 1/4 NE I/4 SECTION " 5 T I S R I W W.M. W W SHIIGTON COUN . 1 OREGON SEE MAP ISI36AA coem SCALE 1'=100' 4 ° 6139.14'E C.R.■ km `a14,K,,k 44 ‘ e a.2iae. RECEIVED PLAN 1 t-e 2 69.431E 8 5 0 r,/ 2000 2 1900 190 75 1 80 120 70 4 119.1 60 800.1• 1901 1200 1100 1000 602 loo 81600 FEB 1 0 2000 . sus s e • �� N • I 3 _- ^ Q I CS.I039I Z e O • I1e.87 9 ' 1O ©� 0 CITY OF TIGAt :. W 13 00 9 00 ^ � N D © ° 3200 Q - O3 a r) e 44.o n rl = �n��n �00 r�• N ■ e 120 70 116.24 10 W J o © . 1400 800 w 2 J e ` 4 46'30V 2 5821 o '^ 6 ` 190 I1•9s °•∎ra 5ar S3A3;3100 Z 1500 45959 4600 470 84.28 ad 06900 /^ O ^ w e O 44p0 26 40 1oP6AO® a •• ir0 /w r Q • 24 A c O 11 0 • 66,4 / 89.57 100.16 J 1600 147•01 fa.116 �1' i0o 0 2 / 2800 P 3001 Ri J c- --- e- - -- 96 1 0114E �b .o.00 r O .� w O N $� / _ E , 95 �J 6900 2 w / 99 g5 NT4_� x.500 • • N - _ so? 100.09 ,.� .4.1 ._ .. �.■e o IU •�] 40I+JD - - 263.0 - /4 °44 _ f ' ag61 / 1 "2T 64 43, o * / c o 41 ) 6 4100 2 . 2 /. �, p°� tS - -N� V \� 1 f �'1 283 ` 1 .STAC. +.Nj' yE\ s 4E 9°4.5 1 i �: 547°: i o _° ` 4....,lit, .• o I j 63( • ^ 6504 1: I, 6.40 o I X 1 z ° ' 0 77 AC. 1 F ° 1z w 1 ^ °_, J`7' z 6105Pc' ge I W os •\t 1� 6' I o AP 4,,i ,3°11.•`1 . 1 .. 4 N 89°20'E 295.9 7 fi a SOUTH/LINE -- 104.5 `G 4` 0 `� 6507 gs = 2.7.9 AC. •, w0 b TM,I1• ".O \�2 1)6C)\ 48T Q � ' G 6°G' .0A ■ 2 $N 6503 p•‘`' /.39Ac. 3 : .w ,x r 6506 O n °e /5 Ac. s . w N • 46 0 O N gA. 0 N u 2 6502 2 / 1 /.49Ac. v 0 w o n 5 \i\l: �, A `t = R^ O v o It I 1 • to dam, �..I ^ i,1 6` % ? -�Q I E ` 10 •1 I -CA P.IIr/o2Y 5EH �`� 9`F � /067/A,8c SEE MAP / _ N 89°49'10"w 1 A I 87-81 290.76 I IS 136DA / / �� TR�B" o ' 05 A INITIAL I / `�'o /� A - 11.37678141 1.34 . 0.1050"E POINT . '+ia""�" -a-rm. 4 loi.48 9. 0" I 3 •, • 16.5' EASEMENT 323/9, 97.85 ,` _ 1 S?RM 36s4/ ® Q CCC kAi,D IC I Arne% /067/A.76 I • .. o - i. r • 5'3 • IKtunti Ali 5(rn iIIllrsr rearms: • !.r...11.rdin•of Pin D•llo.(WOO),nnlpf where./it h.r.by.rk.wrb/p/•fb.dddrly.r1 herby ru,.•peer l•al ....oral S. VIM PACIFIC TRLEPIIO•YF A.YD TRLRORAPII COMPAN1•.•CW/.ra(•r..rp•nfi...with • HO/ 1. • K-;•S'+ plr.rr ro.r(r.rl aprrn,.•.J wu.bl.,deeper',nr.rvfrwrl p:r•replace ad hop rlrar....2' _... ^'-- - r:,A wine.re fen ..A appar 4.4 where.. +y'�w f•.•.1.r. • •l:••r••lew rM f•ll..w..y r.er-r.bed pn.prrry•■l ■t• b�Y1 C,...Iy :/fate•.r ,• .z° E. �'�--� •�r� -8 Z rr , 5, - t.e,- f X. .5 C 7 i �. /� ;• 1!/ /E . ' ern. . • exAcr Lo C A T/o,/ o f /ti Afr A/o T b/SCG-oS,S 2 , i ..r,k•. •,., r,.A•_,/•1l....1•.•e. • . I•..• ,,..•.,,., . r d,p.rr,..8, ..., . . ..r .. . ,•.• •451•1 Ib. 2 G .,....., ..p.....,. .. .., ,. ...d, r ..\ ... ,..,. ,....• Abe ... .e„ r.e r .p. ' .r r ......, ...•...... .•ell .. . .. ..l•• ..•.r.. ., •r•...... .r, • •. •••...pi..•.k. •..p. - •••••••• •err• , ... .,...... �.rl� .,• ..,.1 �.. ... •.. ,... .,. �/�G/ .l„ r ,' l•r4(P. • r.,,... /". :F a•.c..‘61. L. �. .ie_ .7 Z if I,/I.,l drrrr`- I . 1 1 ' •. • r r•,a;,.r. 1l. ,pp..e•'l Ml..r. �.. �+►4.+flwv. 11. `, • C F.. r.. .;•r ...frr"w/'~ •r rd n.•J. ..••••l•4 at* ...k.• ••1 ...,....•y ..e.n..••r. •.A ...l.r..,•.lyr/ • ., #O,. leer ••4. 1 y art.• brJ.1..,,b.e...d p.rp...r8..•....r.f«•..J. .,,.,• •••••. -y 8..4•.J•/r•al oral Ihw /gwV F/\ Jwp•I_•p��� gyp__... ._L��.F1'0 P f w ' ��rG/..-.-•Cie.=."`-�[/C rY'�1 L - rca 0ULOON MI CQMNIis10II IX?1M$S[►T.30, 1$ * i Fwd ler a • W. A.T Cary 41+ By Oplbella rY6.wk. ' , • • • • •' w, a , - •s.70way.^7bNiM V1 f t,M,` T .ti ,. J� ..,•r •, .'sue:a:� •' QR1CARAL • - 4• � it•`;�� M' Projects Way Lee - Sanitary Sewer �'^"�`• Easement: 1Y1 Deed Reference: 883/a3ti i ; XNON•N.L"1KEN''BY'THESE PRESENTS: That we (I) C--fin C u-p,--'Los. hereinafter termed grantor(:) , in consideration of the Rum of $ 1 � • • . to be paid by CITY ur TIGARD a municipal corporation g �+,•.. . P Y p pus:ation of Oregon, �srwin- t.; •. after termed the Cif", hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the CITY OF TIGARD a perpetual right-of-way and easement as hereinafter described, together win a temporary right-of-way and easement to u;n an additional area hereinafter described and designated temporary ease- ment, for the following uses and purposes: 1. Perpetual easement: Mi... An unencumbered perpetual right-of-way and Casement for the ;.. purpose of constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, , inspecting �,."..., and repairing of an underground sewer line and ,+•." t.._!'; it appurtenances, together with the right to remove, as necessary, vegetation, foliagt., trees and other obstructions within the easement area, but reserving to the grantors the title to the !ands, subject to the easement, and the riy'ht to make such use 1)..thereof, except to construct buildings,iliF ,ac vii? net Interfere wI rh the %Ines an° nurooses of the easement: r said easement area being 7.50 feet on uat:,, side, when mea- aut•:� of r:y-:' .�i.y a.:o, Gf the f"il.�'.^ten de r1h center line within the following designated premises: Sewer Easement - Sanitary Sewer A strip of land 15.0 feet in width situated in the Northeast K of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, the center line of �• it which is more particularly described as fellers:' 0aginn.ng at the Eset X corner of said Section 35; Thanes N 89°49'l0" W along �' the east-west center line of said Section a distend of 654.78 feet to the ,Z+ true point of beginning, said print also being B 89 49'10" E a distance af r,. 8.0 feet from the Northeast corner of a tract of land described in Book 323, Page 91. Washington County Deed Records; Thence N 00°19'03" W e distance of 27.0 fest; • `°^"3G" ':.' o diet~c cf 110.10 feet to the terminus of this description It Thanes ,� a. �. il- ' t - Y 2'. Temporary easement: None. Together with the temporary right of ingress, egresr, and regress, and use for sewer construction purposes, of additional- N lands '..• lying parallel to, along the — aide and within W., Lest, when mnsaured at right angle:, of the above describeed— it . ,• :, perpetual easement area, excepting and reserving to grantors :.' the unencumbered enjoyment, us, and preservation of all strue- 91 • ' tures present upon the premises. This temporary sass-sent shall F.,. - term:.�ate upon completion of the sewer construction work, at �i which time, upon request of the owner, the City will issue a ' written release thereof. • Page 1 - Easement 6001(1067 --'T ( MEZSJ t 'r . 111 I ti .-_mow F.:M, ^'. -...y:L;r. .•r.• �_ .'{�� ‘ { �(' .p� . ...I `*14‘4174:01,;;;6;., ..to .1. 'j �.� ••-• 9 ; r•k.•,---1-..'11:f..'.'',"‘t ".... ,'ii ti J��1 • }J•s•µ,. As• ''' IA ;� !' r' •l/•.•.•�!••I y_r. r , �� 'Y. c p..1T �•M.4�. ..tr. 507 yk' . Shb(il&it.ba' necessary."to'cut and remove any brush, trees, or other ymattes:or ::matsYials:trum• the easement area, said brush, trees, or other 1 .matter.:and.'iaatezials.shall be removed and disposed of by the City and the F_'«.'r.City .shall..leave the easement area in a neat and workmanlike condition. The 'City••agreesiethat:in._.connection with its use of the perpetual easement area 0--: ard'in inspecting,•"'repairing, maintaining, or replacing said sewer line. the- City,.•.wii1.,1eav�?•the:.premises:in a neat and workmanlike condition and as nearly • ';.''in'the•pre-existing"state •as._practicable.••. • IL, The grantors.'do hereby warrant that they are (.:.a owneis in fee oi:.,plc • and have''the 'right to grant the above described. e�►sements. .! Witness our hands and seals this 6 clay of Octob.r 19_� •r: zr.. (SEAL) . r�""�iy� (SEAL) _ Prssi1 r (SEAL) • / �/ (SEAL) h _ '�' (SL L) (SEAL) s' •` • 'iii For a consideration, the mortya,uu lien on the above described 1 • properties is hereby made subordinate to the easements above yra/►i...u. e • i- „•;. Dated this day of , 19__ 6 i - ' ' Mortgagee '..• ',.; By :., • . Title •' • ;;. STATE O!. °Amos ) . t 'e;' )aa. �. +.County-of • ) x; • 3r ;a 2, C' • On•this. day of . 19 , personally- I. -'.. - appear ed•-the.-above. named. . !,- • „y.• .ir:1;t t 1 'and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. - • • Before me t . '. Notary Public for Oregon r ' . • My Commis....on expiress :i. hoi•.Page,2. . . . K':Easement.. boos 1067 to 281 .� {OS P.r `y r• K , Y.r 7:1"./.' e..... �' '. .. `-<— '°:. .Ir•� .•�•Tr�.•C';r': '�1 .'A ).Si.•l• ;I"•i°_ r ,5 '•- . .• w4.•..i3 FuAiMla• •m .• w i■t W� ^ f1r.•r.♦.- • .e +r g . • .• I ,•. �, edN•,{.. •tJ,.& . .-`:y'.r•.:�.::.�`�M'i�tf: ,:.M 1 �k ,.,' y.i� �A•• - •. pp, 7 it ,.... iii,ot,, 507 " , ,_�. .n:A^.h.,i'r:.,,,a 3. k.: - 3:a. ..,txj,ai ,..):,6t:.,.:day of October , 19 75 before me appeared -teas 'ilk••j�� �` 'LEE !^d --21210114.11....14 .—.............. .[ Via? hoth'•to„`faL.,.personally known, who be;. , duly sworn, did say that he, the said ' 1IAY M. LEE i. the President, and he, the said PRISCILLA D. LEE is ...`•• Secretary of • WArY. j,EW. GEMLP!L COt!rP.AGT^R. INC_ the within named Corporation, and • that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, end that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by . E.- authority of its Board of Directors, and wY d. LEE _ and PRISCILLA D. LEE acknowledged said instrument to be the .7 free free `c• c i'nd.deed of said Corporation. I` f. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set r • .... . .5�;vet'.;•'.• my hand and affixed my official seal the day �. s r t•; ni and ye ash fiiSov� w en. C•w• �' �i:��) Notary Publtt for Oregon }��`� �s, • g • ........ . My Consnission expires Anti!, 2Es 1977 MI STATE OF OREGON ) as. rs.:11.iK County of ) ,,• •� On this day of , 19_, before me appeared j' and `* bath to me personally known, who being duly sworn, did say that he. the said i • is the President, and he, the said 0.' !i is the Secretary of ; ,; the within named Corporation, od that the r' seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that s the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and and ‘ , acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of • said Corporation. p..P. ' IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my !' hand and affixed by official seal the day and ''ii year last above written. . • Notary Public for Oregon :'.%'• A a,z• Corporate Acknowledgement My Commission Expires ,. F++►. .i• /' r b0011067 rnct282 1 1k • .' y 4 r . Syr• .• . '•'•".... .n.J, „..•:,•"&:$: " • ..T4-v. ..,• . 7:. .• •• ...,....1,..3..1..4:4.�`S ,_ • •w•: '1w.:wip•; .i'.+.57.►.•t.... :p::L.'./ . • .• -• .. e• . .• :. . ,: ' >, 507 . •i� •• .. ' STATE OF OREGON ) ` )5s. ofd �Ccunty of ) On this day of �,19_ -. ..r. before n.e appeared "f avid - both to me personally nTc own, who being duly sworn, did say that he, the said is the President, and he, the said . ''`�4•' is the Secretary of ” : the within named Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was • signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and and acknowledged said—instrument to be tie free act and deed of said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my _ hand and affixed my official seal the day and yeas last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. ,.;., My Commission expires . • AccLr•rnnci: P Mill 44 . The City above named hereby accents the fo4egoing grants and agrees ' to comply with each and every term and condition thereof. CITY OF TIGARD --By:tqa.ye,o/r ;' t•4 y_ By: / % City ecorder t•-: a STATE OF OREGON ) "` ic. )sa. 'ire ti.' (� ! ) �; County of 1.„� �c' t . on this at. day of : , 19(x., before me : •' appeared - an• -_ . • Pth 4rao� ly kn w n••n r being duly;�'• both to me .personally known o bein dui sworn, say a' a, a • said L 6,r6 R J,„P_ is the Mayor, and he, the said �,, is 'the Recorder of th CITY OF, T GARD, a unioipal w corporation, land the said ,14... P d„,,, and acknowledged the sai inatrument to • • r • ac an f • deed of said municipal corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my °;;' official seal, this the day and year in this my certificate first written. r • No ar u c or Oregon E ;�'. ••� �f.,r , t '4 My Commission expires i Pays`3 h u 'l'' f, �'' .0'. 4r 1 S ►.L Eaai1e is 0�' ,� 601x1067 FACr28 " .'rWaca.r•0 0---„,-,,,,...."..—si17 •.•. .jr:••,•..:`h�, •-..rI. .... ••:.!"`.:11 ;�2.►a.' +e rl'' '0 se' .... �..1 •r t A•'. '' • -yIP; Y..:. 'h i . it_•, ""te.1.4,1„•,);. �.r ��,'!� �r:�. 1.• w.'' •, • r _ 506 IProjects glee Las-6tores Ssraer _� f; Easements H 2 • Deed References 370/196 }: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we (I) Nay W. Lee Gener"1 Contractor hit.t .A UScLgg�gzDpr.r1^^_T_ hereinafter termed grantor ■:; , in consideration of the -"um of 5 / 4 to ho paid by CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of Oregon, erein- °'''* after termed the C__y, hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the CITY OF TIGARD a perpetual right-of-way and easement as hereinafter i described, together „sth a temporary right-of-way and easement to use an additional area hereinafter descried and de,:7narpd rpmpnrery ease- : ._o. ment, flr the following uses and purposes: .,711 1. Perpetual easement: - An unencum'weacd pc.p. ual right-of-way, and cac::::cnt for the P purpuse of constructing, reconstructing, operating, maintaining, L- - inspecting and repairing of an underground sewer line and appurtenances, together with the right to remove. as necessary, It vegetation, foliag.., trees and other obstructicns within the P.:.. •' easement area, hut reserving to the grantors the title to the .` lands, subiect to the easement, and the tight to make such use thereof, except to construct buildings, as will not interfere with the uses arm rurpcses of the easement; said easement area being 7.50 feet os, wow,, side, when mea- sured at right angles, of the following dess:rtbed center line t• I within the rol lowing designated premises: Storm Sewer taaemenL I's A strip of lend 15.0 feet in width situated in the Northeast K of Section 36, ? Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, the center line of Which is more particularly described as follows: i'.- Beginning at the East K corner of said Ssctlon 36; Thanes N 89°49'10" W al r' 0^9 !.the east Wsat center line of said Section a distance of 631.08 feet to the 1!Northwest corner of that tract of land described in Book 323, Page 91, F ' Washington CoL'nty Records; Thence N 21°58'22" W e distance of 20.44 feet to the uses p,, paint of beginning: V. Thence S 00°26'47" E parallel to end 7.5 feet distant when measured at right angles , . t:- --....--1...... c;:c.•-rtori of the ucot°rly lino of said tract a distance of (� :•:;,•% 77 360.00 feet to the terminus of this description. .•i.? "; ,,- r. • t 4.. . ,;v,. . 2. Temporary easements None. I� !4;.• Together with the tea. rar ri ht of ingress, egress, and } regress, and use for se y sewer construction purposes, of additional L•. land, F. go;, lying parallel to, along the — side and within — .:. • i Q;� , foot, when measured at right angles, of the above desorib.d perpetual easement area, excepting and reserving to grantors s.• ,-.•� '" the unencumbered enjoyment, use and reservation of all strut- t`I P r r.' .•� *; turee present upon the premises. This temporary easement shall ■ s terminate upon completion of the sewer construction work, at . •'' which time,. upon request of the owner, the City will issue a 0.: �r.y'� written rolease thereof. 4t4` Y . ?�F,..,.• • Page 1 • ..,y :.: Easement 6001(1067 p� E276 z. 1 : i•.• 4r eq„•• • . . , .- - • ••• , .. . • -•' '...- '''''' 4•'' e .. -''''-v.;•••••(f.,:.---..i-,c1 `ik-J 144.- Z4:e...;:i.-.:%,•'• -. •-■.?"--.,. -, • - . • .1:r r 1 j. ..:,,...s.:,,,,....y.,......) AA- ...,i0., r, ' •': . ' , i ..:•:,u. .„........C.A•.•,. 1 • ,i,— , 7 g ". • . . . -. ... , . MaiNEEZEMTIVitiV:le.d..:::-'..- . •: • ..............................,...-.......,..,.. ..•,C,.. .. , • •„,. ..• .. •••• . • .A._ • .. . ' ....)'• % •:- ... „Ij...;.4*:.`• . ., VI■ '..' . • • : ' .' ., . .:‘ ;.:'-.::.*; - 5C16-::: •?..• „ • . ,..• •; ... ' . —., .. • • • marl' 1Thouid-it_be-necesaary.:to-cut7and'remove-any brsh, trees, or other - V.:. .matter or:materials1.,fromthe:easnment area, said brusht trees, or other matter.:and-materials-shall,be:remOved. and:disposed,of by.the City and the •,....',. City shall leave the easement-area-in a neat and workmanlike condition. The ,- :.;. City agrees-that in connection.with.-.its use. of the perpetual easement area- - • and in inspecting, repairing, maintaining, or.replacing said sewer line,•the- .-• City will 'leave:the premises in a neatand workmanlike condition and as warly, '. . - in the pre-existing state as practicable.. The grantors do hereby war:ant that they are the owners in fee simple . . . -- and. have the right to grant the above described easements. . g g . .. ,..,,, • - .. .. . witness or hands and seals this 6th day of Getadmv , i_.•,7,s4 a' - (SEAL) ...dad A."411;17.;... (SEAL) gl' . •ves • •af C/0....*K:- 01.4.u.v '''..--t::.211/(... e/ MI (SEAL) (SEAL) li'•gli• Secrstary/Traasar r wo..5.11 • lia.:;.• (SEAL) (SEAL) :.'ilk. • For a consideration, the mortgage lien on the above described --=: properties is hereby made soboruinacu cu Lie easiumonth above yrantad. WrOrt mi-, .. m Dated this day of , 19 •• - • Mortgagee ). .. 'j:. •.'- • 1 I... - . By .,.. :. • . .s a i, ,.Ito• -X • Title :. ..1- it • STATE OF OREGON ) . .--.,,,7e.,, County. of ,. On,this • )as. II ) day of . • 19 , personally -..- .. - .i, . , appeared 'the...above:named • ' .2;,... 4• .- .. . • ,,. • ....:z • ..7"6. and acknowledged the foregoing instrumeLt to be their voluntary aot-.and.deedoi...A '3- •. ... Before miss ■•+ :7 ..N. ',... .‘ . , . . .. .-. . ' . . . . . . . VE—TlraIribarregon, , .. ..My Commission expiress . . • •-•;,.., ' . • , ..•- f . • ‘;i■P I ... .page;.-2. :2' ; - . • . • • . . •• - • bOCKA.06TrAGL2 n .. Y. . • i.. .; . . . 4.. *IF• . e — .- . • . ryVegt.:471:740:0'-"'N'..'''.7.1i7,!!:::4:...r' -leir. ih.,.. . .. I . . • •V,w1,.•...•r• ,:.-1., . .:0'• ,-, - ----■ -,r.— .. ..-,.1. .' ..,"t:LI!fi a&till't NI.;.. : (•‘.-..•••••-•.•.--.1.•tv,.:•.-.• .1••''. . • ''''-.•41W•PliNSQ"k't.311K''''0.:4 ...*•..• ••11,•‘rs'•?;;;•-•''.,. ... % ......•• ... -•••••• . - _ , •••,•,... .............. . ...rk-r•--.5, ... , ; •, _si,r—sr,- -...„ :.,..r. :,:z..:,..„4„ot.:...,61:--til-3.4414414,-. 70 !i.-..-...PA'tp..-4...t....-...-., ..,:-......—.:,:..i.•-e...-:•.;if,• .,. . '. - . . . c.. . ‘, .,. .:„,.a ',,,,,i,,,:-;?...!7.11.:...... 'T':'4:1=21...—.X1Wr '11.1■168111.'' Iiirailli.'ft?.'"V" '''''.'1.'- 'f • ti■041 r.. ± •.� _At 4 "�"�'r'c ,"a �F4YT�c•y}(} t�•.tF�.•t.fir '�.. �r. t'.�•�. ...� y^• ��y. Ti 3".t��•L' :••.L = •4;'. P• ••F� \.:h...�:•• Aiggara=fabgall,CIPt.:41444,A..- .._.t.—..,..=....,A.....s.r... ..,.......A i :.• i-.. . -.-•- -—..i.,.., el . E we ...., sr -ort-0 0 7 . ) 506:. P.ir:•' '%•'.; ,:='rdf; . ; )is -. ,.:County•ofe -) On this day of ,19_ E.:-.: before me appeared and • both to me personally cTnown, who being duly sworn, did say that he, the said ' ' is,the President, and he,.the said. ' is the Secretary • of the within named Corporation, and that. the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate real of said Corporation, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in beh. .f of said Corporation by .:ut»ority of its Board of 111 Directors, and and {, -. acknowledged said- instrument to be the free act.anrdeed of said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY :. EREOF;. I have hereunto set my ' " hand and affixed my official seal the day .; ;. and year last above written. k'� z.r ts�re:. Notary Public for Oregon. t�NW _ My Commission expires 3 r.: 1 ACCLrT\I ci. wall .,•.• iii The City above named hereby occur-as the foregoing grants and agrees akl WI* . III to comply with each and every term and condition thereof. CITY OF TIGARD -� ' `o Sy: - 4L.ET/LS/ a ae,. Mayor , - • ny, 11. li . Ci y ecor e `y . , ri - .. STATE OF OREGON ) r• -4.;"County of (,.) 1 ` ) '.T .,.../ J Jon..this . ,. + day of.. k /nnwNr _ , 19S-1 , before,me�.�=: '", ; ,;,•, appeared e.'o i) ik1.-." ,.. .,1;..rr„� ' / ;V: -v..-.botleto+ma+p4c$QDal cknowniihoi::being�dulysworn, essay t .nei..the,%e .•i•.,e ', said' (J,.lb„i- .a is.the..Mayor,.and:he, the said_.. _.. . . ;:;" - s the 'Recorder of the•CITY or T , a naicipal-•.. . . -" , raEion the said �•/ 4 and +` c acknowlic�ged Otte said in rumaa�- :�Oe': �=tse��'act•end•w '� '" • .''dead.of;saidisunicipal.corporation.. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my,,•hand and affixed. -16. . a official seal, this the day and.year in this my certificate first written. 0, ry c or vegan .: •pOTdkk• ..�, . • t' `:;•11 ,.r,0 iib06f,, : My CNmrsalon expires ar'. •+ Page-3t ', .., . . 1°, • •h�OF.nP. 'LtJ Ir�.8,4-- - -K7ra :—/Ift +. Easement •y: st..t... f'''''''soco106? ►a2 1.9 t*"°"""�er....a a.. ...� - a. . . ,- -.,-.;,.._-..i..rips-. .. ii.,_.. .1.1. i ltcici:0::,€,).4..arlr. ....., . ..i0.�.. ...c.c -...e.......... ... _ . :. . .t,..„........,.:_4. . ,....„.. 2c.-c--.0 F-4. •4, •••,,• . .- ri OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Northeast Branch 1548 NE 15th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 (503)284-2142 FAX (503) 284-4162 THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FOR ISSUING TITLE INSURANCE Date Prepared: January 24, 2000 Oregon Title Insurance Company 1548 NE 15th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 Attn: Theresa L. Marshall Reference: ORDER NO : 263798w PARTY REF: BANK OF PORTLAND PROP ADDR: OTHER REF: Map Nos. 1S136AD-06505 and -06503 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is prepared to issue title insurance, insuring title of the land shown on Schedule A, subject to the exceptions shown on Schedule B. The proposed policy or policies and indorsements are shown on Schedule A. Issuance of the policy or policies is conditioned on payment of the full premiums, and on recordation of satisfactory instruments establishing the interests of the parties to be insured. This report is based on the condition of title as of the effective date shown on Schedule A. Matters arising after the effective date may affect this report. New exceptions will appear for matters arising through the proposed transaction. Any change in the amount of insurance or type of coverage may cause the premium to change. This report is for the exclusive use of the principals to the contemplated transaction, and the company does not have any liability to any third parties . Until all necessary documents are placed of record, the company reserves the right to cancel, amend or supplement this preliminary title report for any reason. Any questions concerning this preliminary title report may be directed to: Theresa L. Marshall SCHEDULE A, Page No. 1 Order No. 263798w 1. The effective date of this preliminary title report is 5:00 P.M. on January 18, 2000 2. The policies and indorsements to be issued and the related charges are: Policy/Indorsement Description Charge ALTA Standard Owner' s for $105, 000.00 472.50 Government Service Fee 20.00 Additional Chain Charge 75.00 3. Fee simple interest in the land described in this report is owned, at the effective date, by: WAY W. LEE, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. , an Oregon corporation 4. The land referred to in this report is described as follows: (Continued) SCHEDULE A, Page No. 2 Legal Description, Continued Order No. : 263798w A tract of land being all of Tracts "A" and "B" and part of Lots 1, 2 and 3, WAY LEE, a duly recorded plat in Washington County Plat Records, and a part of the vacated portion of SW 69th Avenue, all of Parcel 2 as described in Document No. 80-27388, Washington County Deed Records, and a portion of the land conveyed to Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. in Book 1012, Page 172, Washington County Deed Records, located in the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, the boundary of which is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 2 inch iron pipe at the Southeast corner of Lot 3, WAY LEE; thence North 89° 49' 46" West, along the South line of said Lot 3, 188 .59 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the Southeast corner of said Parcel 2 of Document No. 80-27388; thence North 89° 46' 01" West, along the South line of said Parcel 2 and said Book 1012, Page 172 a distance of 172 .25 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of SW 69th Avenue as deeded to the City of Tigard, recorded as Document No. 85043572; thence along said right of way line, along the arc of a curve to the left 23 .10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap inscribed "Cooper Consultants" , said curve having a radius of 280.00 feet, a central angle of 04° 43' 35" , a long chord that bears North 26° 39' 23" West 23 .09 feet; thence North 29° 01' 10" West, continuing along said right of way line, 56 .62 feet; thence South 89° 45' 56" East, parallel to the South line of said Tract "B", 107.84 feet to a 5/8 inch by 30 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap inscribed "Hertel Pls 1896" , said point being on the East line of said Lot 2; thence South 00° 38' 07" East, along said East line of Lot 2 a distance of 13.66 feet to a 5/8 inch by 30 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap inscribed "Hertel Pls 1896", said point being North 00° 38' 07" East 51.34 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 3; thence South 89° 49' 46" East 290.74 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod, said point being on the East line of said Lot 3; thence South 00° 03' 44" West, along said East line of Lot 3 a distance of 56.34 feet to the point of beginning. Order No. 263798w Effective Date: 5:00 P.M. on January 18, 2000 SCHEDULE B, Page No. 1 Except for the items properly cleared through closing, the proposed policy or policies will not insure against loss or damage which may arise by reason of the following: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2 . Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3 . Easements, liens or encumbrances or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records; unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4 . Any lien, or right to a lien, for taxes, worker's compensation, services, labor, equipment rental or material, heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 6 . Municipal liens, if any, imposed by the City of Tigard. NOTE: An inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk, and subsequent advice will follow concerning the actual status of such liens. No search has been made or will be made for water, sewer or storm drainage charges unless the City claims them as liens and reflects them on its lien docket on or before the date of closing. Buyers should check with the appropriate City bureau or water and sewer district and obtain a final reading. Such charges are not adjusted in escrow. 7 . The subject property lies within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is subject to the levies and assessments thereof. 8 . Easement for existing public utilities, if any, in vacated street area. 9. An easement created or disclosed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated May 24, 1940 Recorded June 11, 1940 in Book 190 Page 388 In favor of The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company For Anchor purposes Affects A larger tract of land of which subject property is a portion; exact location not set forth (Continued) SCHEDULE B, Page No. 2 Exceptions, Continued Order No. : 263798w 10. An easement created or disclosed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated October 6, 1975 Recorded February 5, 1976 in Book 1067 Page 276 In favor of City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of Oregon For Sewer line Affects The Southwesterly area of subject property 11. An easement created or disclosed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded February 5, 1976 in Book 1067 Page 280 In favor of City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of Oregon For Sanitary sewer Affects A strip of land 15.00 feet in width 12. Mortgage, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated October 28, 1976 Recorded October 29, 1976 in Book 1122 Page 659 Mortgagor(s) Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , an Oregon corporation, of the County of Multnomah in the State of Oregon Mortgagee(s) Securities-Intermountain, Inc. , an Oregon corporation Amount $1,600,000.00 Loan Number Not disclosed (Affects Lot 3) 13. Assignment of Leases and Rents given as additional security to the Mortgage shown next above, Recorded October 29, 1976 in Book 1122 Page 666 14 . Financing statement, indicating a security agreement, Recorded January 14, 1998 as Recorder's Fee No. 98002973 Debtor(s) L&M Restaurants, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Carrows Restaurants Secured Party Francise Mortgage Acceptance Company, a Delaware corporation (Affects a portion) (Continued) SCHEDULE B, Page No. 3 Exceptions, Continued Order No. : 263798w 15. Unrecorded lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon examination of the original lease, a memorandum of which was, Recorded January 26, 1998 as Recorder's Fee No. 98006322 Lease Dated August 16, 1974 Lessor(s) Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , an Oregon corporation Lessee(s) Coco' s Restaurants, Inc. , a California corporation, successor to Grace Restaurant Co. , a California corporation, successor to Far West Services, Inc. , a California corporation (Affects a portion) 16. Unrecorded lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon examination of the original lease, a memorandum of which was, Recorded January 26, 1998 as Recorder's Fee No. 98006323 Lease Dated May 22, 1997 Lessor(s) Coco' s Restaurants, Inc. , a California corporation, successor to Grace Restaurant Co. , a California corporation Lessee(s) Carrows Restaurants, Inc. , a California corporation (Affects a portion) 17. Unrecorded lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon examination of the original lease, a memorandum of which was, Recorded January 26, 1998 as Recorder' s Fee No. 98006324 Lease Dated December 23, 1997 Lessor(s) Carrows Restaurants, Inc. , a California corporation Lessee(s) L&M Restaurants LLC, a California limited liability company (Affects a portion) 18. Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated December 31, 1997 Recorded January 26, 1998 as Recorder' s Fee No. 98006325 Grantor(s) L&M Restaurants, LLC, a California limited liability company Trustee Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Missouri corporation Beneficiary Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company, a Delaware corporation Amount $520, 000.00 Loan Number Not disclosed (Affects a portion) (Continued) SCHEDULE B, Page No. 4 Exceptions, Continued Order No. : 263798w 18a. The beneficial interest under said trust deed was assigned by instrument, Recorded January 7, 1999 as Recorder's Fee No. 99002100 To FMAC Loan Receivables Trust 1998-A (Affects a portion) 19. Any facts, rights, interest or claims, which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by making inquiry of the lessor(s) and their successors in interest in the lease described or referred to in this report. 20. Rights of tenants, as tenants only, in unrecorded leaseholds. NOTE: Taxes for 1999-00, paid in full. Original Amount $1,005.71 Tax Amount $1, 005.71 Code No. 023 .81 Key No. R279629 Map No. 1S136AD-06505 (Affects a portion) NOTE: Taxes for 1999-00, paid in full. Original Amount $8,433.63 Tax Amount $8,433 .63 Code No. 023.81 Key No. R279601 Map No. 1S136AD-06503 (Affects a portion of the herein described property and additional property) Mark A. Stelling, Title Officer MJR/MJM/MJR/MAS/mlw/mlw/mss/lcd cc: Bank of Portland Attn: Jeff Tainer s - 3 Igo 1 � 0 A 4200 0 0 58C0-MI 4- 4n--J 500 a + p JIAC • • 23 - (C.S no. 12843 ) ^'a - r • ° •— ,p 190 r ti v I s4 2a 1- 0 M r J• 4300 4301 0: w e I # r9 2. G`. I IOO a \_° tad OAS _ — — • I> �— O x 131,4 120 '0 toy ----_..- •X3-6. ' 1.4 t0 _ —• - -o ,6%.55 c �6••z "t16400 °°7200 + mow. ./6AC,93 API VT) 35 30 (�� ° rr 1 M 3. 2 . O .zs>o « \� 9$ I ,, • ..41f W SOY 4— — —, �, �6 9°' � x 6300 6"' t 6504 i ; 649Ac. .` - I o = .77'AC. a r. / x 1' ° �� 6lO�c• �I ..•�t4. 25 'r' a a ti° * `_ .. i N eV 20'I tszsu I -SOUTH LINE THOMAS STOTT DLO. 53--z.`, kjik..Naz , tt°- 6507 \ t�I r A a! V 2.7'9 AC. A 0 ..' o 6503 0 Pt; ,,.. A a - rt « I.39A4 3 : �I . P A.Y 6506 k .Al At. a, • 2 VI 3 vil CO – V aI ,{ r A � \ Od ....L.--"-**--.. n—u3'I•f r 0. 6505 INTTIAI_^� / T A• IT—T.41370 B R F� 5740. Noo�ldeot POINT :/ 1 �3 S , 4Z2 ».• �,1 - 1 0�i•C� .l{t1�'Q.. _r NEYe41'sr• 41430 E1 E 3EMNT 323/51 47.65 +� I SEE MAP IS I 36DA THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISES,AND THE N COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS, IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,AND LOCATIONS ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. Alit (O 41 /-/v d 1d„ti( oC 5=5/-615 Z.2,4 d 916- 7 - a)/d/2-t. ed- bee/Y/7'g 71/ v aLe. ) 9 / 4/ `,Y lit-;/ (a! 78) A-7/ -j-f reel c d.�c�f�,, -up /.��,,.� et..// epoievol 5•4 pg.)/K S ac'.elu.ffrnftAS<— -4;( Z, ea /a444. - /ST / /e �f f ..and h 4:(0? -- ` 14r ' (a-,.c..?” w CG/ .,t j d (7L7` / f& "Li X421 // , (.?-;/-e.) d-- 1214 f4 11. Svc G --((4() h-u i 5/'p// c(.c LLQ1L �v S Get /�v Cam, �t o �c, Il cc J ,G� Q.c w.L2� �!�� O 4300 4301 U N - ` 85 .1 05 — — _ _ °— _ _ p Z 285 r o o° 102 = n p in © 0 2.01 55 263.0 —. _ 2 -/I O # 1 \°�'6� ''2� 6 4 C . �r � / m �.,. 4 3 A 5 N g1 35 30 �� O e o 6 4100 2 N 2 a �6 1 "' �,o'�� In W 2 8 5 .57AC. — — — m �`��E 9°9! I c 4i.• S4T°2( 1�6 0 I 1 630 ° I I 6504 I 'I 6.49 0 a I - 0 ' - Z o .77 AC. • X , I :I 14 ( 0W°a 21 00 ° O I .h, �o 61 Ac. E, 25 .e9 I u 4. °�: I ID ��5ti 30"' °G • • o ." 'L + N 89°20'E 295.98 Alp 30-83 ■O ,o----SOUTH )LINE THOI Ls G ,.Vz 0 �z°'� 6507 • � ee� �� °• 2.79 AC. m 1 • PG` O 46 T4• X s' °G` n ° 6503 5 �oOA �•� n a N m pt\ ° N /.39AC. 3 r n / c r •• 6506 ° ° W in h s y ./5Ac. so v N o •Z © N p ° • P e 10 = 6502 2 r 4. /.49 A c. a CO u. r I m f O to 0 ° to Imo= •6, .5 9• 1J DWI \ of I r `� • ......... 1 N 89°49'10"W ��/ CATEII"��'��_ 290.76 �� BT-613T7 �, R\ 2 \■ TR B p •505 0L I .& 11.37 0°10'30°E POINT I n 0 r // O 1,2. 67. 1.34 6 23-'lr� i 1■ ■ 101.48 3_ 9. O. 1:=,.3 41/ / 16.5' EASEMENT 323/91 •T,• /r j • SfoR/�l .5 tn/ ��� •Z°1 .. /067/,276 .f " ® ccc ;,�;,c Ic I Bann Igo USA 06105n1`)6- . FIRE 4 YJ T. No 1J E A fl PR-o42o5a • AS 'fWis 1) A Ste_ C(=P 1 cc � T_?,, Diitxj Qt.�6- o r_ .35.21► FT-. C n � ) � j V RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 1 0 2000 CITY OF TIGARD AFTER RECORDING CA- fc-ow_C RETURN TO: WAY LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. 5210 SE 26th ST PORTLAND, OR 97202 INGRESS-EGRESS STATE OF OREGON ) EASEMENT )ss. County of THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of I certify that the within , 1999, between instrument was received for WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR record on the day of INC, an OREGON CORPORATION, , 1999, at hereinafter called the first o'clock M. , and party, and WAY W. LEE GENERAL recorded as Document No. CONTRACTOR, INC, an OREGON Record of said CORPORATION, hereinafter County called the second party, WITNESSETH: Witness my hand and seal of County affixed. WHEREAS, the first party is the owner in fee simple of By: County Clerk-Recorder A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF THAT TRACT OF LAND, AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, WHICH HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN PLATTED AS LOT 2 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED SUBDIVISION AND ALSO BEING A PART OF SW 69th AVENUE AS PLATTED IN SAID "WAY LEE" BUT NOW VACATED AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 87-61377, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. AND WHEREAS the second party is the owner in fee simple of A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE", SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1127 PAGE 44, EXCEPT THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $ 1 .00 and other valuable considerations each to each in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: The first party does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the second party, their heirs and assigns, the right to use, at all times, AN INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT, over, across and under the following described property: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WHICH BEARS N00°38 '07"W 94. 29 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S87°24 '35"W 89 . 52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 40 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 18 . 45 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF S74°11 '42"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 18 . 29 FEET; THENCE S60°58 '50"W 10 .04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W A DISTANCE OF 26.00 FEET; THENCE N60°58 '50"E 10.04 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 66 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 30.44 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF N74°11 '41"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 30. 18 FEET; THENCE N87°24 '35"E 90.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N87°24 '35"E 34. 72 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 32 . 65 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°31 '18" , A CHORD BEARING OF S45°49 '46"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29 . 14 FEET; THENCE S00°55 '53"W 35 . 20 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 23. 76 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°45 '39" , A CHORD BEARING OF S44°26 '55"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 21. 35 FEET; THENCE N89°49 '46"W 54. 30 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 20.49 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°54 '00" , A CHORD BEARING OF N21°10 '48"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20.25 FEET; THENCE N05°43 '49"E 17 . 29 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 7. 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 12.01 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°19 '14" , A CHORD BEARING OF N43°25 '48"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 10 . 59 FEET; THENCE S87°24'33"W 17. 16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 6, 108 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Said use to be confined to the ingress and egress to and from the second party's property and the uses incidental thereto. In construing the foregoing agreement, the singular shall mean and include the plural wherever the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties have hereunto set their hands and seals in duplicate on this day and year first hereinabove written. FIRST PARTY SECOND PARTY WAY W. LEE, PRESIDENT OF WAY WAY W. LEE, PRESIDENT OF WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , AN OREGON CORPORATION AN OREGON CORPORATION STATE OF OREGON, )ss. County of BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named WAY W. LEE, who being duly sworn did say he is the PRESIDENT of WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC, an OREGON CORPORATION, and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. 1 O - _ I EASEMENT EXHIBIT MAP 0 10 20 30 40 I SCALE: 1"= 20' AC AC /#LP AC J I 10"MAPLE 10"MAPLE LP I SPEED 12"MAPLE BUMP � , LP* 0 e e # n 6'0 MAPLE G13 o o <A CURB % I CO CD Ns/' Ac G-P I _ AC - 34.72' ` 90.41' _ �- T_ . . _ . . CURB GJ � � • m e PROPOSED INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT a- AC m \ J�r\Oa` \ AC I ,T; z • \ AC • ra, \ J it. Lci • D W �\G\� 9 �� 89.52 — . . 1 .16' ,. . ..• R,40 0 m I 6"MAPLE L-O / \ N o �O• ' 8"MAPLE e �C M o a CB#2 CURB I N o LP - _ 8"MAPLE * — - - 6"DELI - PROP08ED PROPERTY __ � .14"PINE o 1 CB#3 e N i • x R, I• �� CB 8"MAPLE 14 90' FENCE AND GATE m . is 1 8"ALDER ��— X - -L X __' �` 8"ALDER CURB / 54.30' I ,MH#2 12"ALDER EDGE OF AC 3•'3 3' UDE ID. Jc `. M a• I ,n 24"0 DECID. • CABLE w 'C' CB#4 ►-_ CLUMP D/W. FENCE r 113 - POST AC o MH#5 J CENTERL eWV to ,I-EDGE OF A 1,"PIN AFTER RECORDING f C L_ RETURN TO: WAY LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. 5210 SE 26th ST PORTLAND, OR 97202 INGRESS-EGRESS STATE OF OREGON EASEMENT )ss. County of THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of I certify that the within , 1999, between JHCB instrument was received for PROPERTIES LLC and CHAO CHENG record on the day of WU, hereinafter called the first , 1999 , at party, and WAY W. LEE GENERAL o'clock M. , and CONTRACTOR INC. , hereinafter recorded as Document No. called the second party, Record of WITNESSETH: said County WHEREAS, the first party is the Witness my hand and seal of owner in fee simple of County affixed. A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART By: OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY County Clerk-Recorder RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352 , AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS . AND WHEREAS the second party is the owner in fee simple of A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE" , AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1127 PAGE 44, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $ and other valuable considerations each to each in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: The first party does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the second party, their heirs and assigns, the right to use, at all times, AN INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT, over, across and under the following described property: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WHICH BEARS N00°38 '07"W 94 . 29 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S87°24 ' 35"W 89 . 52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 40 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 18 . 45 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF S74°11 '42"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 18 . 29 FEET; THENCE S60°58 ' 50"W 10 . 04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W A DISTANCE OF 26 . 00 FEET; THENCE N60°58 '50"E 10 . 04 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 66 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 30 . 44 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF N74°11 '41"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 30 . 18 FEET; THENCE N87°24 ' 35"E 90 . 41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N87°24 '35"E 34 . 72 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 32 . 65 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°31 ' 18" , A CHORD BEARING OF S45°49 '46"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29 . 14 FEET; THENCE S00°55 '53"W 35 . 20 FEET; THENCE • ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 15 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 23. 76 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°45 '39", A CHORD BEARING OF S44°26 '55"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 21 . 35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352; THENCE N89°49 '46"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 54. 30 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 38 .00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 20 .49 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°54 '00" , A CHORD BEARING OF N21°10 '48"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20. 25 FEET; THENCE N05°43 '49"E 17 . 29 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 7 .00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 12.01 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°19 ' 14" , A CHORD BEARING OF N43°25 '48"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 10. 59 FEET; THENCE S87°24'33"W 17. 16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 6, 108 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. of the said property of the first party, said use to be confined to the ingress and egress to and from the second party's property and the uses incidental thereto. In construing the foregoing agreement, the singular shall mean and include the plural wherever the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties have hereunto set their hands and seals in duplicate on this day and year first hereinabove written. JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC THEODORE E. BAXTER CHAO CHENG WU JUDY H.C. BAXTER WAY W. LEE, PRESIDENT OF WAY W. LEE CONTRACTOR INC. STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss. County of ) BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named THEODORE E. BAXTER, who being duly sworn did say that he is the , of JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. STATE OF OREGON, )ss. County of ) BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named JUDY H.C. BAXTER, who being duly sworn did say that she is the , of JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss. County of ) BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named CHAO CHENG WU, who being duly sworn did say that he is the indentical person named in the forgoing instrument, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. STATE OF OREGON, ) )ss. County of ) BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named WAY W. LEE, who being duly sworn did say that he is the PRESIDENT, of WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , an OREGON CORPORATION, and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. i .o�� � I EASEMENT EXHIBIT M•AP 0 10 20 30 40 I SCALE: 1"= 20' I AC C JC I J 1#LP d 2PLE 10MAPLE 10MAPLE LP I BUMP e *LP e o 6'0 MAPLE Gym CURB W I o i AC 15 I qqr JC • • 34.72' _ . . — -_ , . 90.41' T_. . . _ . . • _. . . ._ CURB GJ�� a m ED • _ PROPOSED INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT I C N I/ Z L r- I It wv) '.•�1W?�°o \\ '9 _. . . _ . . _ ��- 17.16' -' 'p� •\ ok9 r �— 89.52 0 L_0 I o • •� Et'40�• I m I 6'''MAPLE o, W a � \ � JC N• ° . No- ` 8"MAPLE - n o \\ C8#2 CURB cZn- • RE w 0. LP* s"DECID — _ 8"MAPLE* * _PROPOSED PROPERTY LNE _ S 0 _ -1 • • 14"PINE O Et? I • CB 3 CB g. \∎� eta• FENCE AND GATE m ?7S I 8"ALDER 4::, 14'90 %---.77--X--=-1 X-1L X ——*...;.9...,'" -�� — • 54.30' -'. .•�� 8'.ALDER CURB MH2 121'ALDER EDGE OF AC / �' CLUMP AC AC I in _C -) a• I u� � 24'0 DECID. • • • CABLE I w /C C84 CLUMP,..___ii DEW, FENCE r 11:3 ____4 . POST qC a J ol. MH#5 CENTER ' ewv I Z \ 1 /--EDGE OF A 11-DING LEWIS & VAN VLEET Incorporated principals chris c.van vleet. p.e. gory j. levels. p.e. STORM WATER CALCULATIONS FOR BANK OF PORTLAND TAX LOT 6505 SW 69th Avenue Tigard, OR FOR Pete Vrontakis `'-, ROFcAi' /v 14 i. ..2 9. �C% • \9• SARAN EXPIRESI2/31/2000 Lewis& Van Vleet, Inc. Job Number 00079 consulting engineers 18660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 (503) 885.8605 phone (503) 885.1206 fax LEWIS .& Job BANK Of �R.?c.AlaD consulting engineers �{'J''' 18660 s.w. boones ferry road Client 4�J��//��'�` � �J ynr tualatin. Oregon 97062 Job No. NVL�/q By 1`51'+{ (503)885.8605 phone (5 03)885.1206 fax VAN VLEET Date 3. 10 • 00 Sheet No. I In corp a re t ad JTORM WATER CA Lc5 r TOTAL SITE AKEA ; 2z, I> S1 ARC-,A To QE DEVEC.OPED : (3, 110 5-c c 3o ac 6Xt5TIK1C� IMP. AREA 4,25Co N 61_06 dPAVrl`ic 10, 29(.0 l k1C.R eD IMP AReA 0040 5.c- > '0005c :. Der Re6D RA r NFAl.C, : oDOT, tot4E 'j 1 i,T EAS1Zy -DWZATIOO-F'ReateVN CUM DET IllOIJ : 2 , 140, 25 IR 24 414 5 M►N Toc } EXISTII6 CorJorTiOt4$ : PERviou5 5654 5‘;. 0.20 O.C. 1 MPeie V i OuS 4 25(40 0. 10 Oa = C A + Cr A 2 �' � P LL AI _ i = 0.25 (t .5` :el 1v\•lO. 20) 4- 010 .521). 1o)= O. 2i c 0 25(� `� V! � In �hr��•2fll � ��'� t._.IolCo.io)= o. 2q crts IQ _ 25 (?....451A/11 r 0.9 (2.4'510. 10) - i . PROPo CoTo1s : FtRV rocs 2 , b14 5•I: O. o(p { IMPERVIOUS 101 2.969 0.24 1 02= 0.25(( .52. in/haf-400 + 0.90,52.X.29) = O . 35 c45 r (910= 0.2.5(2. 10 in /hrY.3�) + 0.9 (2 4.140'X •2 ) = o .461 c -S 1 &25= 025(2A5in1hr)(.4Io)--d.9 (2.45x• Z4') = O. 5.7 c45 DE'r MMl-ri011 VOLUME RE6D = IO5 0_ SEE WoRx,..SIfaT S(.4AFAc. PO ti Ot Lr, o C.Bs I & 2. 3 51 Z 36 oz5 )(.0 2s) 1 ;• PoNg d = . 3 voL = 57.Co cc £ac,N Co 2 (5 7.4.)=- 1 1 5.2 > 1 0 5 OK • RAINFALL INTENSITY - DURATION - FREQUENCY CURVES 5.0 .■....■........1...• ! ! "Ii_____•_N__=....'..'.Iii ii raiiimpullii i.iiI i" ■.■...r.,..,1u111 11 111EE: ::::.: ..... : . . .:......, i , I ! .. . ■.....I lil'i'i , II ll,---N....I'.:::11$'IIII I� i =.. .1161i 11 iililihII1 4.0 ■■SI. ■.....I I _ _ I ;•i iiiiIMmi Zone 7 --e _ ' !' !!{ E=°===_==--; ::B°� Lei° -!-: h;: i. i:ii --- -s: e1 114 1 !1 _-E-__ :::e e$ I?IIII : : ... 1 . . s as--- :.:i::::s Ill; : 1 !. .r.`•.I..Ir :I:s:--s- l-�■1 i■■■.raii.■..:li:.i.■C.. I ■: ■.■.■_■IIII I II iiIS. .--.■' -■■ ■. ■ .nn . ■■ m . t —■■----■-■■u■anru.nrnuu ■....._.;....lii...• .mI=111��..�-- ...v...... ........ire ■.II I I 1 ■..... ...r.-....n . i.. -� ....■ ■ ■..r.. ...1 I.I ■.■■■ III .I���=��1•��..............ii11111 ■■■■..■.. .. I :•.Iliill .►�...... a■1 ... 11 111■■■■..... I 11l 1II-- -.....■.................III ■■■ILI MIil.i.in.•IIIilisii7M■i.�...■■ iI.■IIu. IM11111Iuu.1 11111111 ■ IIIII.■.■.■.ruuun..uu 2.0 ■■■■■■ma-.1mi ill I•:'i..c\. mmi ■ .0 m I I■ ■.. ...1 1 i r I I..IM.....■■....■■.u...11.11 1I ■■.. •■I..il . '11{IIII{1i111 .Q'.11111W11111• ■ ■■ill II 1 1 ■C...l... li 1 1 I .........■■..........11. I.II L ■■ll hr:•il�iiilli "viil:imbra s1■\', ; .•3..g■i� ■ 1 1� ■iI.u11111 1i E ii 1..■■i■.■■■....ul■1 111 L .1111��IIIIIIiiiIlfi iillfilii ::C'i'.li;��ie l 111 i i ff ii mbire II.. I. i1� � �1�1um lIl I I I j1H011101fl111111■■■■..■■IIII1111111 N 11111 .::VIIIIII I I 1I I ■..■ ►1■■ `��Ii'III -a,ll 1111 11 1111 III III I ■ 1111111111 v, 11111riluIllii::i�1:IIIIii Imml'.whiz uIiIhr 11;till'IIII11111:11111 111 II II II CI■Cl■UIIIIuuIIIIIIIIIIIIi�i i L Illllllllllllllllill ii... ��■ae■.�1 ��.� �i: 'lil�i. 1':11111 IIIIIIIIIIII lip■■■■���III1111111111111111111 - IIII IIII II 0 ,.0 11111111111111111111�IIIIII111SER■NIIIIi.Ili:.iilii!�11101011�1111111111111111IIIII■.■■■IIIII11111111111111111111 C ==- an sl °i== — -_a •-, ,.:.:e:--- sass•- I _0.9 - _ � _ _ - -: .........._= = 1M— =z■__ 1- 11 ::g 8 'aa:: it _______ 4111 0.8 • 11:i... 4:C__—=_-- Z ■■■ .1. 1111 Ill 1� 1l11■.i---a-ai ..:■1■■i ■■II . h: •.'.. ■ !! iil•I l=1E__---- ._ I� 0.6 .. ... ---■- i... . . ■■. ;l.:liisilii�i I i►. I— i Il sass-- i. ....._.. ••iii„ .iii.------- ■... nn i r-aa--..__ ... ■.. ■■ u■ ir.■■ ■ i or ii.•. tlih! ni■.�■.■.A-.. lip z ■■■ I...I.I.. Iii=-----.■■■i;.■=..rl■ i.HI iiii...i.�.i.•.i.I.I....le.l�l11:_�-r.....■■ . . ... M$I.■l..i.d ■ u ._------■ u■ . . u icu.uui.n . wu nl�i.�-..a..■ Mislaid — 0.5 ■.■ hen.I.hu run ' IIC—_.C...■■.■.._..■ -.■. ....■.... i III. ` ■.. ii i --- -■■.■■■.. ...1 11111riailhirilililliirlEWINCRag:ILIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIII .�.............1 {.. .Ii1 MI - .... ■.............. I�■C ...... . ■.. .•.1. I •llm- ■■.gi..k_.►.....■...........I a 0.4 ■■..1.■........nfI I i •_..M••• ..111 .ih'■ . liii 1ii.• n.■��.�`i'.s.■.:■......u...I.I 100 Yr. --ii::I11i=1�.===C==�O�.:�CC� . : 11•. III iliili Ii�CCC��MI�a-_sass= :....i:,:_==__=_-_alias- i:::::::a; . l I --._ .... .=aa��� ... ... .:��- .,......a• ...... . 50 Yr. nu.ate.... 3. --- -�-- -- -- of ■=i•-•��r .Iu.IsaaT.-..-...■■■ ■■ = I II i i .I.:i,as---�,. ..r..•.i Cr 0.3 . .sass--- .. 111111111•5511:111 un n...a.---.� i■.•■u . 25 Yr. .. ulna 111.1sa---.. 1=u w a-a�-- .ii►.i . i-i= ■ • . . = a-----■-■■■■ ■r■ —a■rI---MINI i -•..1.■.� - ■.MINI MINI .. MINI■■ • i :••.s..� iii iE__omm r.. C. iii 1. 1.. ■.I iji'ilii 10 Yr. i=... ... . === =a� •• .... ; ■■ ■■ .91111191111111111 I1_m......i..••=MINI Milli.�..� / W. I ii�iiiii: .i f5ANK OF- {M-Ot I LPcAJ DETERMINATION OF REQUIRED DETENTION STORAGE 2. `IR ST0g 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TIME, MIN. CA, ACRES RAIN. INTEN. INFLOW RATE INFLOW VOL. OUTFLOW RATE OUTFLOW VOL. REQ. STOR. in/hr cfs cu. ft. cfs cu. ft. cu. ft. 5 0. 2.7 2 .-1 5 6. 6)(42 1616 0. 31 102- 6i(r) Iv 1 .91 0.452 309 20 I OS ( 5 1 , 4 2 0, 444 -611 30(p 66 2(.) 1 .-40 0. 36 q53 40o 45 25 ( . Z3 O. 33 4°1 5 - I2 3d V H2 v BA *— bF f156M44.1t) SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES ) 1 , 4, . 36 ******************** S .C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 1-YEAR 4-HOUR STORM **** . 36" TOTAL PRECIP . ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 14, 98, 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES ) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 1 . 0 96 . 8 . 1 99 . 5 1 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS ) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 05 . 77 85 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: BANK OF PORTLAND LEWIS '& consulting engineers Job NJk OF Pt)RTLAlJO ,N V�2oKIT'A K.�s 18660 s w boones ferry rood Client //��//yy��+►Q tualatln. Oregon 97062 Job No. Lam/ f'I By ` M (503]885.8605 phone (503] 885.1206 Fax VAN VLEET Date 3. 10.40 Sheet No. Z I n c a r p a r a t e tl 7 ).U.ALIT•I IJE- IMPRRv1octs At2EA (NET) 1 O4o sc 0. 14 ac. 1 o, 2q Co 54 - 42.544 SF = (0040 Owl = 0 . 05 Gds See {-zirrrour IF us►iLL6 'ol.JD RA 112eATMer VOL - . 3c49" (1MP. A R E A) = O. 0 3(4 0 0 4 0 4 ) -..: ( a l cf l2 1. F^MD VoLume = DET i WO, = 105 - 1 e c = 22C cf Ete'A/ Arz=-A VOL A ME 210 f Coo 2.5(4 291 352 4c194 29 2 5-7(4 4b ND To E. i 29 1 .0 FoR ',J.0 - Poo D T o E Lcr V 2a i 2.5 DCTcZTionl 4 i 1 ORIFICE DIAMETER WORKSHEET ro j ect Name : s.vr Number : OOc Computed By s Dates 3 - IU-U0 - PROVIDE SKETCH BE:.CW OF CUTLET STRUCTURE ovEZ Fty� (O e no ( CM In f E zgl.rf, ► n�� Sum-�tcf Env= Zal I.Z5 • TRCArJv T SURFACE FlEYAfl0t4 Z°11.0 (� = 0.Z°l c�s ' R`s 4 ;- — AB: za1.7.5 -7go.0 0 •,\aS SCREW ;. N C E.l.OUT Z-O•O POND 90ROL t'1 )4,Oz+Ftttsa.F _ II • 1 o0 (p' STUN SEWER OUT • r'T -112 CLING. 3%� OttAM ROCK • • ` : WE£PHCLZ EZL 1 11 31Z o tcc �w7sIaU � }—�- ue, ZS(.5 r-c 3•--U Orifice For-:: 1 a : 0 • CA ( 2 g h ) ' S WATER QUALITY EXTENDED DRY POND OUTFLOW DEVICE Given : C = 0 . 61 g = 3 2. 2 Design C = 0.7-9 c.f.s . h = i•Z5 f ee r of head Solve for As A = C / ( C ( 2gh ) • 5 ) A = R 0. 61 ( 2 x 32. 2 x 1.Z5 ) . • ] ( c . f . s . ) (head) A • 0,053 , sq. ft. (orifice area) Solve for Ds A • pi . ( R ) 2 R = (A / pi. ) • 5 = ( 0.053 / 3. X4) ' ' Q 0,130 ft. area ) 0 = 2 x R x 12 = • 3 . 1?.. . inches ■ ■ ■ • FPOM : PETE VRONTAKIS PHONE NO. : 3531377 Mar. 10 2000 11:29AM P3 F 4DM U!HE'R T EL-EAGLE L P-iCNE N . : 5g3 544 3190 ;eb. 01 2000 1::34 ! P2 = .. - - . - - . _ - . - - ■ - -r- ■ - - . MM. - . - - j ' } t�P��°*51! I__ . . .a I fil 6RAPE b LLEAN Eu S r,,,,a 1 I OVTUt Ta 0426114J To 5EAS0NAL t(TU4 - ---7l VOIME MACY 12P1Row PIPE —f.— - — — — — • -- .... • r • • Y ■ . ■ *IMO - .... 7 1/ I( 1 . \\ . mr- v., , Of . \ i 1 zogf ,00" IREVISIONS' a/Z5/99 MOVED SOUT}I P/L S' TO SOUTM AS PER "?7LE WUPANY E 2/'/00 ADDED DPCM AND CREEK CENTERLINE O St COO. 1 Lt W LI 15 & LE , 1 ' OF J llLrUUVNJINO`u- LJLi-z1 consulting engineers 18560 s.w. boones ferry road DATE JOB NO. tualatin.Oregon 97062 �• 10 •OQ DQQ7 1 [503)885.8605 phone [5 03]885.1206 fax ATTENTION // ^ lcb,.. VAN VLEET RE: IJ�, ' '��1/ PO l /�� Inco rporet -tl 40 OF Al"♦ w rDD RECFI\FFD MAR 1 0 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5S-r" WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items: ❑Shop drawings Prints El Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 Ca -1 5To,2M/C g of kk f LA-iU • THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval ❑For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution 4s requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints /❑For review and comment ❑ ❑FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO pEr6 VRoArrikas SIGNS flcH / A) If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at . January 25, 2000 City of Tigard Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner RE: Bank of Portland Here is the additional information that you requested: 1. Please fmd the narrative for Chapter 18.360 2. Authorized signature was provided 3. Lot coverage is as follows : Gross area 22,188 sq. ft., New development area 10,667 sq. ft., Landscape 3,781 sq. ft., Area to retain the indigenous plant material and remain largely intact 7,740 sq. ft. 4. Please fmd the narrative for Chapter 18.725 5. See map and copies of easements 6. I spoke by phone with Mr. Eric Mulligan on December 16, regarding Fire Department Access. He agreed with me that a 20' access through the one-way (enter only drive to the south side of the building) is not necessary because, the 24' (ingress-egress) easement from the properties to the north is adequate to satisfy UFC Section 902, and the access required by 902 is not required because the entire structure is within 150' of the right-of-way (Sec 902.2.1) 7. We will provide a report by a certified arborist. SC^E krr -C PLAID 8. See Public Facilities Plan 0/;,/ See Vicinity Plan 10.We have revised the drawings to depict the center line 11.We have revised the drawings to depict the name Bank of Portland. Sincerely, RECEIVED PLANNING Pete Vrontakis FEB 1 0 2000 Board Chairman, Bank of Salem CITY OF TIGARD 503-393-1377 (home phone) L07-- L_t oe- DSUSTkPNT ik--ProtiAL_ ,a 1 _ - }} r� L I rL -:',;.70,:,:;_,......f, t �+ s i ■a! , ' r h. ti rk iti _ ,1 '-. t i t£a t Y?---., bs-',Sy I ,n•I t.4, ,...;,,s R jbl r p4 , d �' '• �`-7/T'y^ Za O T -'--�'h ` ! Q I !p' r i 1 1: I.I I > y r ��%t l' s• is ,t1 1. �eJ w .x. r r ;u�.�; e r OF.„7"4Ds : :- t rF CC --ss��yyyy�� , . ^'.6 4Z--,it„• r,' t-1:4'..1.-,..2. p 1F -L f.I r`"�� .` !K„ 120 DAYS = 10/21/99 SECTION I. APPLIC I N $LIMMARY • • CASE: F AA1;,I. , L_ Ad' uen ; Lot Line _, tcnent (MIS) 1999-00023 . PROPOSAL: The a � , PP 01, has requested Lot Line Adjustment approval to incorpora 1,,emnant of tax lot 6502-into tax lot 6505. The remnant piece was d by the re-alignment of SW 69 Ave. " t land are Bo h parcels of t �y,way Lee. , APPLICANT: Way Lee 5210 SE `A' e. Portland, 97202 OWNER Same as '+ slicant PARCEL 1: ;, . OWNER : , PARCEL 2: Same as ....„•t•••,::::.• ,. •••�' LOCATIONS: The SW Pacsfi located at the southwest corner of the intersection of c wy.'8.'SW 69th Avenue. PARCEL it: WCTM 1S136AD Tax•Lot..6502. PARCEL 2! WCTM 1S136AD, Tax Lot-6505. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • DESIGNATION: General Crfiaa ZONING dr '• 4 DESIGNATION: General ` Cc niercial; C-G. ' The purpose of the general commercial .^ a areas is ta;Lpr-Jvide for major retail goods arid services. Permitted uses in t C.G zoning district are :public agency administrative services, I g fraternal and civic assembly, parking, amusements � Rl, animal sa ° , d services, automotive sales and light equipment repairs, an tg her,uSes. ` r' APPLICABLE `,; REVIEW CRITERIA: Commune ORmBht Code Chapters 18.390, 18.410 and 18.520. .e-).; a,,•" it ,1.**, • . NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION Mk -4 0023-LEE LOT LINE AQIU T tt2 1 PAGE 1 OFa L0 39tid 3WDti/111i1 66S0-b6Z-COG 017:12l 6661/0Z/60 SECTION li. DECiSjl .. , }}��,, ,:;w: s. a • ` _3„ ' x` 1 -- <-•ems - [I 1:S • • • }l ::, ..,.. >,.,. CONDITION OF APPROVAL ' IMO • . G RDING a±,;,1">1 '� 1"S7 _ . -. '1 . .tr ` - SHED j�[ :* Ef. ) j p •�' E' ' K •F CO ? -, `}DiT10,�,.. . . s ,.air, ' r)1 . .$C E D 't !� .,. :, ,;.. .. .��..:.�ate ,. �-_ _ �'�f r ��,,t �� ".;;;:.-;ii-.',". � . ..;;:� r -_ ,air:: 0 .. 3• ,. ��. '' ...__ i ,..._y..a 4...,..'. ,c.. .:.��'�_;� ,xk„�,` ;"Cyr' t • p 1. Prior to recording, a L 1ustrnent stave .and legal descriptions showing . ` the existing and r Y r, 9 p opos ,�t e iii Shall be:revlew . ,nd approved by ';..� Department. The PP y the Engineering e sury shalt include all access and utility easements. Please. ~ submit materials to Plan :.� ivlalon. .. t �, �4--:?;47•,', �3'.57'�.'�^'R �T Ny �- rt Y �t� ~ �►n•-1yi '.. X tRW ' CI . _ r { ',, PP.' ...�.�, Ivri k EATh -- u% _ iS 4t ri 744:1 .(!�a .r - '1t ''.:', ...t . . o.., -rC.$-,.�i x..c._,; L..),, - .. 'F�•.r •G.9 ; P 't./Thf k'.t ' R••.7 +a" -" <.4 iztei CP ,4A. ;• o-iil l ,J dlJt!ti/ , g�4:? i-. o-µT 'fi t'- '••a: c.. -- a ta i& Hr; •, • I. Site Information: ' - These commercial lots were eateci as part of-The Waylee Subdivision: The Lot Line ' Adjustment will not interfere wltt t te;existing building•ar parking of tax lot 6502. i.: Mi Y,r - ..• Proposal Description. -: : r,?..?' The applicant has re uested e Adjustment aptirtiY$flo allow for a pending sale and the future placement of a ne 1 o:.develo '• gre: ::: P . proposed at this time. The ��• proposed adjustment will i `�"' �.... • ;ts ro �: el mire: atit piecerof:tsx�:of and.m into tax lot •'- 6502 merge this property ;? of 6505. The remnant pi g created-by the:realignment of SW 69th Ave. Both K lots are owned by the applicant< T L V. AP• 0 ` `� wr. -a 1 p AN • F • L "• COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUMITy DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -AP qY S ANOARD$' Section ' 8.410.040 contains the following standards for approt care',Lot Line:Adjustment request: Section 18.410.040 - Approv nteria states that the Director,.shall a a request for a lot line ad'u °: pp..rove or:deny 1 �t in writing -based:: oar findings that.the following criteria are satisfied: : . ,,�i :. :: ..,...=, An additional parcel is not c fib,the lot lhie adjus ent, and the existing parcel `r : reduced in size by the adjus nts as not reduced ielow the minimum lot size established by the zoning disc ct; ' No new Jots will be created as ` i` `t 4,f.this adjustment twd 0) lots exist and.two (2) lots will ; remain after the proposed adju a t There is no:minim* lot size in the CG zone. ;;;41:-,:::.!g:..*:,,,4 , ., " NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION T r e PAGE 2 OF4 !� .��] �10;1115T1w( lT X12 80 39tod 3W6b/3MM 6650—bEZ—COS Ob :bT 6661/0Z/80 • F.t j By reducing the lot size, thotc ;�pr structures.(s) ort the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zor1 dls#pct-regut 'ans iorthat district; The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, Including: • The minimum width oft ' , .Irling;envelope area shall meet the tot requirement of the applicable zoning S t; • The lot area shall be as ttfred by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way not be included in the lot area calculation; • Each lot created through;tte;'partition'process shall:tront a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a, legally recorded rninimum 15-foot wide access easement; and • Setbacks shall be as regti qe4 by the applicable zoning district. The resulting parcel widths ,� ,. 9 p w tlnue o..exceed the minimum lot width requirement of 50 feet and each parcel front ,ita 'public street. Based on-this information, the standards have been met. With regard to flag lots: • When the partitioned lot ,:a.--flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided ;;at;no side yard is leWthan 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so ae t maximize seR aration:f om existing structures. • A screen shall be provid d along the property 114.;of a lot of record where the paved drive in an acceSitway is located within den feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Section:010440. Screening jrnet also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots nti to provide-uea :.,: utdoor recreation areas for proposed development. Neither lot will be a flag lot; the fare,:this standard:does;. Q0 apply. The fire district may require;::y a installation of;°.a,film;: ;ydrant where the length of an access way would have a d , co ital effect oh:fire-fig ng capabilities. No change to the existing ac a. � ©sed as art Of this Lot Line Adjustment. .t�: , ��P � 1 Where a common drive is to a provided to`serve. more than one lot, a reciprocal �, easement which will ensure�es'.and maintenance flights shall be recorded with. . : • :; the approved partition map Both lots have access to eve }` • .,,.:•4 p d s' Therefore, this stetiiard is met. Any access way shall co »71xti#h the standards Access, Egress, and Ci set forth in Chapter 1,8.705: `. 9 rcula tt"" .• Both lots have direct access to) 'ed roads; therefore, this ndarddoes not apply. ` :q t SECTION V. PROQ LAND APP. aL t ATION Note: 4:::j AA, :: Notice was posted at City Hall s •`�.� ,.caw. :':�' ;• ;u �„ : :I. X The applicant and own"Y`" .:4..:'"•4'9. .. X Affected government ' $.: " ,, . 46;',',':',:: ;"''S r ;'. ='Final Decision: A Lot Line Adjustment is a Ty: a,Sroceith re• As such, tile`. Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or other,!` Orovided-:to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The 1 5: ., Director's decision may not be .1, ed locally and is the final decision of the City yam, y NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION 4` fr e',,,3 SEE LOT i t is* �=' PAGE 3 OFa 60 3S'Vd 34V0t7/•iMM £6S0—bEZ—£0S 0b:b1 6661/0Z/60 1! .1 ' .. •`(1 ‘ r:u '�..I ri I. t 4 1 �,• • THIS DECS.S f UA.04 AUGUST. 3 �4q9 AND BECOMES• r< Er 14EO.Ma �r AiI 999. : =,Y uestion$: 'If you have any questions, .1,..:,,,,', '-.It:the City Tigard Manning Division, Tigard Cit y Hall, •3':s 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, rJ.- • .Oregon at (503)b3171- , 4 ../ fr . J PREPARED BY: a - =�. � �'' � August 43. 1989 -< • si .I DATE • Winer , 1 , •l Y s APPROVE BY: Richard .'� .4 R b _August 03, 1999•Planning -.` DATE 4 .. :l... .. _l. ...4..... • �I�YI18.Y 1c Nt/11�5' ::........„4;i 'r a. • . ' �..: . i.' 1899-00023. h.. 4 • ' te; hf::•• '2i.s^'; .4.'4 :i' .•.. ., ., .. • �.r y.f • ii ;•`Reif. -:.::...:. 7.•• ; •a '.y,:.4..;,,4,...,,:,......,:•••,.......:.....:.::. • • n• • . :�: S._ :...1•• •<•. ' ' '...:•••i • ,,,A.^+. •r •. s'yYiYf•a.' ;i' ..4.} ., ~� '': `fir! • .'>..> :♦ NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION �'' LOT LINE AasrM PAGE 4 OFd OT 3£dd 3W0d/iMM £6SO—tiEZ—£0S Ob:bT 666T/OZ/60 , . -..,:t•-...,,:•.-•'•...:.,..r,..••••...•., '......-.-.-,,,>-.....•...---:-,,t,...t.---,..,-•,:.•.•+•••'ee'.....":.•....*'••" ,.,--••••.:.•••••••.••,-:--"..- "'--:,-. :-..".•-••••;.'-:-:.-;.• •-•,-;'-,•:•:•••,-`;,:.7.-,.1"f.';,-,.- ..•--1-:-‘;-:;-'.:,---....:-.-.••••..:".:,•.:If.'i.."r••,',.''..-, •*:''.-''°.:r•-•''..6---.':':%.".:11;1•Vt?0.1",'*-112.,.s.r..-Ii.S:"."--•.;:.-"..,--:-':'.,:-::-.C••.:,:'..-44' . - . - I. - - ■ •I ! -[ -I 1 TiTil -: I -- -- --- -- • .----74. . •- . , •to • .___,. i(c411111111‘ — , GIOCIL•PbooC iii,4610,1fp• 1,1,110 . SI . • ............_ . _ .—__. .._.._._ _i___ " 1 i -. W 1 I , • 1 1 . t...-_____ - LI OAK .._..i.. ... .. . –1. — •- - - ST - .. f. 1 1 I I 11 i 1 [(1 1-- i ( 1 i t< I I 1 • ...- ..._ ....... _ ....... ..._ _.... im 1 I i i 1 -.. ....._ ..._ _.., _ 1 i 1 -! . : ii I i i 1 _ . , . i . 1 I f I . -• II: , I ( E, ( - i 1 j - - Y! • to i .!IC - i ,\ 1. .. .. . . . .. ; M151999-00023 .. . ... . .0 • N-- • I -i - • , 1. 1. X . -- - L___sT1....._ .. 1 ' 1.-.--- ?r ____ , Line i __I ! . . j... ._. - ,.. 1 _ ST_ I . . : i 1 1....__.. . I — E _. -IL. - _ ______._ Lee Lot Li ,..,,:-.....,. . .:,..... „... .._ . . : „:„... Adjustment. , -,--.... .... , .; .... . . __ . . .. t:5.-.2; .-5,."..".7,...,..0...,'''... ,,,q.`MI'''....!::...".',.;-.2...-:";"4-:-.•-:. . 4'''''s'..-'4'7-1:7:-. ±-7-, .'..i,ti'lW-t.....:-..,';--;---;';',.-"-.1.:::illb. '..ji': - 'f- : .-'-• - . -::.-r.'' _ 'n'::: --:..:::;',''' '''-'--,.';''',-; -- 7s--.-.' :.:,,,,,f,,,,,,-.,,„., '''!.: i i i sl ' - :-'_:-::-',.-....1;7c;;;?J....!..e5.1.,,:7::F::"....,Ist...‘.....";"-Vi•,,c.:,•: „.7.'.:f."'-':;,i;:-..::::`t.".;" ;.•g::".;::::?...,','''...-;'..i."•-::.'i....;-:-.:"..-.' :-...f:';?•• • ' ', llet \,..,....\ ... „. .. , • .• • 'i'....i.f.-..r.:."1 r--:`,'''••^,-i I .. . . . I . = ....; ,.• .., •:-.:- . • _ • " ,r: --.• 1. j i 2 SUBJECT... • .: _ .. -::::.-: -,---: .:..• , :-1.-:--: , ,...-. .- .. ...• •;. -... . . ...-. -... .. . . . . - ...•.• .- . „ .;:•... :::::-;- „-:-••••••••-j• I, - PROPERTIE A . . . . .... . . .. . ... . . . . ........ . . . .. . . . . .. .. . _ / . ... „., ,,_. .. ,.. _. sr...........,....:-_:.:...:.- ....--. ..:.;.-.... ::,_,:......:........„,.._........::::_::::......1.:...-..-...2::..:_::....:.:...:.:::_,..7,:.......i...... . .:-....;;.:._;..-....:, .. .. ... . :.iv.:—.? ''..' --1 -.-:'...-::-...-, .' ...-..:;".-.- %•• 'I.---' '-'.- . — ' -- •'.._ '. :-- ' '1 w.. \ I, .--• ,.. ...i.: -...-..-'.'.. ---. -..:• •-•-•-_-•. --,„:•...- •-. ..:...•• .: • '. ; -I!„-.-. '.:.-.. ..----.•••--•-•--•---..::*.—.•c::•::•••••••:', . ... . .. . • . - •• - , • - - • . .• . • • ._ _ •.... • . •.: . -' ' ' '-}-••••,--.-.T.:,-;:•.....::-•-•, :-•••:-..-:•.-:.•-•-•:-_-;:i__-,,•:•••;-,.--", •••••---•: . . ., , \ 3-v•---.---..-, '. :•'•'-:-: •-—.‘-' :---••••• •:-- •••••• •• ' ---.-..::-- ,...-..--r - N...,•Tis,-;.,;.i.1:,.-,......,%1:-.•;:•:•..;:c,. .4,..:iii,.:,:zj-kin.1,,:.-,•: .•..-.1if-IL,--..,1..-s•-. .....;•. ..-.:,•;:ig..--.. ..,•-_.,..;,.1;. 1 • - I : ,`;'-'1"...-: --. \._ --v,,,....,-.., ,„., ..,- ‘,-,•••••...-,, •-„-----,,• ,.--, •._.--",.•••..,,,,..•--:,,•••-.1-,,-,-...,...-..,t,-, ...--,,zy:.....-_,,,,..-z..,••::---;••.•;.--,4•,,, -,- -.•-_-‘‘..-_° . - !z%N.x,...,-.7,.....%4:-....:!-.:,--„,:,----i-,:v_. - . ' f,--•„- -.--7-,::,•.p.n:-...e-,;;,,,-..)2,-:7,---.,:i.:-•..1.-- ,---.47--4.,=:,::....--1.-„if4. 4 ,..— -. --- ,_.•, . -,--)•...-!--11,...,:-..,::::-...,..:....z.,.......s,•,..,,„-.-:-:-•....-:,:, :::,,-.:,.,.....,• -...-.•--.• ••;•-•:•••.--, .--1,5.:1-•-•-•::-•••••-•,,,7,..,),..,. .:---•:• --::: ,.-,:,..--:•.:--:... :•-•_.•••.--„,:..-••:. -I ,,,,... .-; .,-.- 1 e • CD 1 ••:- • I V • . I ! I .' N i I I i . 1 ,,•••7"- " - . - li 1 -f Cr) i • i N - / . ... i il too 203 10t, 40+) irA) f•4( tr) 1 _." , • - ( . I__,... - co tzr , • 1 .. • • - . • - -.-• • • .....■1■■■••6..... .+. . 1 J- - .. .....5 1 . " • - .. . ' t".PS hiai . . • • ,*- ,--1 li cn cn •,---•\ . A 7 . i 1 _._ . _421.01 . . . City of Tigard co • . - N ; . . . . . • - - • ......,,,i . - . . -- . .. • . - In/urination on VIII trap a rc.,pone./bc-alion ceiy and - • '•-• r liaokki b•41 yonhydwilh ha Noseagorord Sar,...,0,., ; ..'. • -•- - • I . . • - • . 131255W M al 04.4 1 .. . -- • -- - ' ..-•'.• - -. . . . . . • - .. 1 Out Oft sni3 isti),,twa.-4 41) 0#114q. ,= - . ......:7,e,:.-1"--;:::.*: ,..;.),,.:•ii•:=,,ille_11-Mi.i.:!:::'44-.;.;;; .$.!a ''.,druk:xliC.,..■';-:- . N. ,,i.....v...7- ::.!:7'7:...-..-,`.'1.--..: ..';-... ''. .-- :- :-.' ;:-'.**: ".- ,...-'''','''' -c-----=:.iAi;.4:0;')":-A66.4. -.i , osityv•',,,:iscsati.... . . .', --.-.::_--11.10 M'IP:1!a-Zel ''41- Fa; difilir" 57:N.A!r" --'r1"Tk.,j5T.rrttlrflrrAjfrNfE7ADjtjffrIVIENT:17--.i'': 1.. ''-'i-v?.:;rtT,STnt.f.g.74:1.q.CL4?f-M57.47`77).Zr-5,1-!-TgkftP. : . , FOR - - - '''...'.'.:-.'"•- '•-.- . :.fr. --;.-- ' ' PETER VRONTAKIS • IN LOTS 1 , 2, & 3 "WAY LEE" . . . • . IQ . cs, --, IN THE SE 1/4, OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 36 • TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST W M - • , L.0 - L.0 t • • LO WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON - SCALE: 1" = 100' JUNE 18, 1999 - ,--. .D. •• . .D. cs, .4c10 TL 6505 in („1 , 0.37 AC, - (.0 't.\- I Lu - -' - - -- - - - — 4. 1 • TL 6507 a) 01 . Lo ...,.. f... ..„.„... ..,„....,;„,,,,, . . .; . ,, . . _ , , , _ , , ,. : . ;- . . -4-..`!.Ct._,,..--,i.k...:_.• .. .,=, .----:,... ....4-•!:".=- -.! • ,-:-.s :t1; '‘--', Z.-::-;:.,,. :•. .;71:.—,--:z ,-..!.,,,:„:w-.. ...-' ,,.ii:.--:.- .,7.•;,;r:i: ,. 7-j:.:1;:i;:.::::::q::,4- ,'2.-' ':r -. -.-' •- _-• - - -: - -TL 60a... .... ,i,....,.7.7.......::;•.,ti:e):..1i:.:;;;?'-'-g-:!; '...4:i::i"-,.:-:::' :';:i.::.!e"+v •4•-.: -•':•5; "..-...•.:.5 ,••••••..; -..i,..-.:e...-N•f....,.,: ,-i. :,.!::•,•:::;..1;::::'k,...j...!lr.:;!.;. ",:''1,- •'1 1/4;:;i......3..■':,:*::i.:: ;.:1 :,-;*i. 7f .. . ..":: -.. :- ':::;.-4:;C" .,-, : . Ian Ac. -..::;:'...'.. .i.-..'s.,--'" .;.:.:-..:-!..:•::•:.-.:.7•.?z:I'-''.'7::!:-N•""!;:".'--3:r:= :-.,•5'-' ;i-.-. .'l.!.-'. - ..;•.::' — c7 'I --- --- - - •. .. -. : • - ..... . :. . • .. •,. ...--. ,. ..-, ,. .• :.,. . . . .. . - - - - , .. ... . . .. . . .. ., s . . . - • . • - • "• ...: .. • • ... . .,- -- :• • •• • --. . . • .. . • • -•- . . . .. " ".. i:. '.-,,• .-,.•-:.,-,... -:.:-.!.:-,f;•••...i.c.....: -.i.-.; .-:-,c,..-...-.; . .2- .. ,, i• • • : - • : : , " .- • • -• -- •-• :" . . ... .. . - . . • .... . ,......- . . ••• " - :. :,.-:,...!';' .'::•'1I .,:7-.1.-.:,)...=':741..--.6scre.: -.--- -.."-••::.-!-"';:-.-... : 1 ;' ':'':7.:a443.:-;.'1...1.'•-•-:'r..,;--J,--.A.41.48::-:'• - z% ---. ---' ---- - - _. . ;,..:77;.:::';'''4".:'4;:''‘1'7'.:;.:?1"‘:::;14.::.;:..:41::7.;■:.;:.:Z...:::'1:1.C_r•A:M. ;‘,...1".1:::<t'l:.-.'.,. ''-: MX , 24,_ ,nt,..,. ‘..,„j..i.,,,,,,, , ,S,,,,t.:,_...i,_..,..,_.„.m...,,..,. ..,,,....e..., tu.aqi..,6fe.t ri.,.1...:::. „ , ,' , - • ,. ' .:'- (.te..• - ,..,,..:',.cire,,-'....;.',.. '.-. . -'-'-',....-.-.:' '-',._.''';,,x,'! ....',:iiiii t..;L •.1.1,^:-2....: 1.....,...,.., . .$,Xt:c.U.i.4,-,,:A. -1,V,..-:a ,., • . .. 's •',' ...: . ' ' '',. 1,:-7-- '''.'''.--- -`-I .):“,'7. :- 'N''..'.:: : ' ',l'AU740.01601R5- -1 .. ''',' '' 'n... .'''-.• .'''' . ...7"p•ir. , 1.....7!.Z,F..e%rr.c...":07::A---",,,..'1,:,:.... ::...,',..;. :...,!1: .■ ::'",-'' A , _ 1 \ \ IL 6506 \ 0.15 AC. \ uo \ • \ N —______ ,/ 290;74' LIN LP 'L,21 15.86' g TL 6505 cn 11.38'to 0. .46 AC oN .o L) -o 1 .1 m 168 ,.30' ' TL 400 m ur" 188.63' c.). ui 2 43 4.4 5 AC. t.) ■ TL 200 . , 2.52 AC. . ., _ . - L ' SD( 19 9 9-ov- (, ealik I�� 3320 NE SANDY BLVD. • PORTLAND,OR 97232 Portland (503) 236-1001 •FAX(503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69th Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ""71/,71:,/,t,A. /' `fic---k/s4/09,-r-r. Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board 1+1.1.1 : I-'E I E UlUI.1 I Hh l b PHU'IL 11U. : .'J.)l._.r ,' Jul. .1 1 J'J'J ULI:alF II I F 1 '§'UL-20-99 03 :58 OM • 11 4200 �� f.S0� 5800-MI Oil 5400 a 23-' 81 C.5 N0128,3 f � _ • I r 4300 430i •• 11 • 1 I _ ..,, a I. �. e tel i se �e `41 s o• 2 :S Op 0C1 t • '' a t ".' . 65a nAC. .+ LfB4Q4 .l o�J aii I ii 1 ' I %, 6'49Ar. 6• 24 :: g ; : ar I. CIFIC)_CILL• 0 I i is L IS a. a' C w 1164 ac Axis I ` Nt TM't.—:NE ThO LAS STOTTT &L. 33 6.1601,.3x •,r5 x0.4. 6507 •S 4 e'rf T 2,1,4c. M a .. ' " R.- 5503 7 _ /.J9Aa 3 0 6806 ,y 2 3 • VI • • 1J1 f y A �r i • tQ L r a • sad• a -.f 7 �\' w wieamR;. � . 6�.. INRW.3 �iS �I I , MCO�IErtioY r I ".,`:'1111, - •..... �• I �' '1.so. w . impocoir MI/II `—, I SEE MAP IS I S6DA THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSMTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISE5,AND THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS,!F ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,AND LOCATIONS it_ ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. SCHEDULE A, Page No. 2 Legal Description, Continued Order No. : 263798w PARCEL I: A portion of Lot 3, according to the duly filed plat of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, in the City of Tigard, filed December 24, 1975, in Plat Book 35, Page 42, Records of the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows : Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 and WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222. 14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 03' 14" West along said East line, 472.63 feet to the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, 188.63 feet along the South line of Lot 3; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, 5.00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West along the South line of Lot 3, 101.48 feet to the West line of said Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, 463 .38 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295.96 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Theodore E. Baxter and Judy H.C. Baxter, husband and wife, by Deed recorded September 1, 1992 as Recorder's Fee No. 92060810, said portion being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222 . 14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 13' 14" West along said East line, 416 .29 feet to the point that bears North 0° 03' 14" East, 56 .34 feet from the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West parallel with the South line of Lot 3, a distance of 290.76 feet to the North right-of-way of SW 69th Avenue and the West line of Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, a distance of 412.04 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295.96 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A parcel of land in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, said parcel being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the most Westerly Southwest corner of Lot 3, WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County, Oregon; thence South 89° 49' 10" East, along the South line of said Lot 3, a distance of 101.48 feet; thence South 00° 10' 50" West along lot line of said Lot 3, a distance of 5 .00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, a distance of 101 .48 feet; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, a distance of 5.00 feet to the point of beginning. FAX TRANSMITTAL u��y� 11$• ' 11+ Date July 16, 1999 Number of pages including cover sheet 5 To: Jeff Tainer From: Amanda Anderson Co: Co: City of Tigard Fax #: 236-0810 Fax#: 684-7297 Ph #: 639-4171, Ext. 313 SUBJECT: Room Use Application MESSAGE: You have tentatively been booked in the Town Hall Room on August 12, 1999 from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Please fill out the application and return no later then July 26, 1999. If you have any questions please call me at the above number. Thanks. — (-try ce__ • - - _— Y Ath CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTIFICATION PROCESS 1. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING/NOTIFICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS: ♦ Comprehensive Plan Amendments ♦ Zone Changes ♦ Subdivisions ♦ Sensitive Lands ♦ Conditional Uses • Site Development Reviews 2. APPLICANT MAKES ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. ♦ Applicants choice of date (using staff guidelines). ♦ Applicant schedules a meeting facility. 3. APPLICANT PREPARES A LETTER REGARDING THE UPCOMING MEETING TO BE HELD WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. ♦ Letter briefly describing the development, location and sets the date, time and place for the meeting. ♦ Note: Meeting date to be held within 2-4 weeks of the date,that the letter is mailed. ♦ Two (2) weeks minimum notice must be provided to the neighborhood property owners within 500 feet of the subject properties, including the CIT contacts! 4. APPLICANT MAILS LETTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. ♦ Applicant acquires list of affected property owner(s)from available sources. ♦ Applicant gets list of Community Involvement Team (CIT)contacts from the Planning Division. 5. APPLICANT PREPARES AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ON FORMS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE CITY. TO THE APPLICANT. AT THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. 6. APPLICANT POSTS NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON THE SITE AND ON THE SAME DAY. MAILS THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING LETTER TO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS. • Sign must be posted at a location easily observable from a public right-of-way. ♦ Sign shall state that the site may be under consideration for a land use application and include a phone number where the applicant can be reached for additional information or comments. 7. APPLICANT PREPARES AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ON FORMS PROVIDED BY THE CITY, TO THE APPLICANT. AT THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. 8. APPLICANT HOLDS MEETING FOR NEIGHBORHOOD AS PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED. ♦ Applicant presents their proposal, including City requirements, and answers any questions. ♦ Applicant makes note (sign-up sheets) of the names and addresses of all individuals who speak at the meeting and provides documentation to the City of their comments, concerns or issues. 9. APPLICANT MODIFIES PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL (IF DESIRED) FOLLOWING THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDATIONS, CONCERNS OR ISSUES WHICH COULD DELAY THE APPLICATIONS APPROVAL PROCESS. 10. APPLICANT SUBMITS THEIR PROPOSAL TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOWING ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS: ♦ A copy of the letter mailed to the affected property owners in regard to the meeting along with a copy of the mailing list and the corresponding affidavit of mailing the meeting letter/notice. ♦ A copy of the sign-up sheet(s) from the meeting(s) held with interested citizens/affected property owner(s) on the land use proposal. h:\patty\masters\citnotif.mst 14-Oct-98 CITY[ O i IG AND USE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Making a Reservation .a • All reservations require a City of Tigard Room Use application be completed. CITY OF TIGARD Reservations must be made at least ten business days prior to the event. • Reservation requests will be "tentatively" held from the the date of OREGON request for a period not to exceed ten (10) business days. After ten (10) business days, tentative reservation will be released and available for other users. • Applications and rental fees must be submitted within the application deadline date. • Security deposits are due at least ten (10) business days prior to event. • Applicants must be 21 years of age or older Rooms may be reserved up to six months in advance of a function. To allow many different groups an opportunity to use the facilities, repetitive room requests will be reviewed on a monthly basis through the application process. Priority room use is given in ascending order beginning with Class 1. Please see the Group Classifications listed below to determine what lass your function fits into. Group Classifications For purposes of scheduling reservations and determining fees, groups are classified as follows: Class 1: City Business& Governmental Agencies Class 2: Non-profit organizations or Tigard resident A resident is defined as: • A person who resides, or owns property, within the city limits of Tigard. • A business whose office is located within the city limits of Tigard. • Resident status is extended to those served by the Tigard Water Department for the purposes of reserving the Water Department rooms. Class 3: Profit events by a Tigard resident A profrt event is one that promotes a for-profit business. Class 4: General Public (Private and profrt organizations based outside of Tigard) Priority for room use is given to class categories in ascending order beginning with Class 1. All efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact, once reservations are made: however, the City retains the right to cancel or relocate a meeting upon 24 hours notice. Meeting Rooms Available and Room Rental Fees: __ Room Capacity Class 1 and 2 Class 3 Class 4 Town Hall Room 90 No fee $20.00 p/hr $25.00 p/hr Red Rock Creek Conference Room 20 No fee $10.00 p/hr $15.00 p/hr Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium 150 No fee $30.00 p/hr $35.00 p/hr Water Department Conference Room 12 No fee $10.00 p/hr $15.00 p/hr Rooms are available for reservation Monday through Sunday- 8:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Cleaning/Security Deposit A cleaning/security deposit is required for classification categories 2 - 4 for parties, receptions, and potlucks. The deposit must be paid ten (10) days in advance of the event. The cleaning/security deposit is as follows: Groups of 80 or less - $150.00 Groups of more than 80 - $250.00 The cleaning/security deposit will be returned under the following conditions: a. The room, including carpet or linoleum, is left clean and the furniture is in the original configuration; b. The room is left undamaged; c. The room is vacated at the scheduled time and all doors to the room are locked; and d. The key and "Checklist for Meeting Room Users" are turned in at the Police Department. The Administrative Services Manager will determine the amount of the cleaning/security deposit to be refunded based on the Checklist and input from staff. If any of the deposit is kept by the City a breakdown of how the deposit was used will be provided to the user. Deposits will be refunded within three weeks of the event or within three weeks of cleaning or repairs being completed. The City does not provide cleaning supplies or equipment. You must provide your own. City Liability All groups or individuals using City meeting rooms agree to take appropriate measures to protect, indemnify, and defend the City, its elected and appointed officials and all employees against any and all claims as a result of persons attending any function at the facility. This provision includes any expenses incurred by the City defending any such claim. The City, its elected and appointed officials and all employees will not be held responsible for any lost or stolen articles as a result of persons attending any function in the building. General Information 1. The person responsible for the group should make the reservation and be in attendance at the function. 2. Functions occurring in rooms must not violate any City of Tigard ordinances or state statutes. 3. Activities must not be disruptive to others present in the building. 4. Smoking is prohibited in any location inside the building. 5. Alcohol is not permitted in or on the premises of the City buildings. 6. Tables and chairs are supplied. The Town Hall and Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium have overhead projector screens that may be used. Other office equipment and supplies, including telephones, copy machines, typewriters, coffee makers, and supplies, are not available to users. Public telephones are located in the Police Department lobby. Cancellations Please submit cancellations, in writing, no less than 48 hours prior to the scheduled event. When applicable, a $10.00 service charge will be retained for each cancellation. Once reservations are approved, all efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact; however, the City retains the right to cancel or relocate a function upon 24 hours notice. Failing to follow the City of Tigard Meeting Room Reservation and Use Policies and Procedures may result in room use privileges being suspended. Leaving doors unlocked, on more than one occasion, will result in room use privileges being suspended for a minimum of three months. Mailing Address The application, room use fee, and cleaning/security deposit may be mailed, or delivered, to the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. If you have any questions, please contact the Room Reservation • Coordinator at 639-4171. H:IDOCSIROOMUSEICH POLICY.DOC revised 3198 bi I t ur I Roam t;ummunt 1 Y iriuuiutriiiii i i MIMS WIT'SJ - HOTIFICATION LIST FOB APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS • WEST CIT LAND USE S11lsCOMMIT1'CC EAST CIT SOUTH CIT CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G.Zeller Beverly Froude Craig Hopkins Jack Biethan 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 7430 SW Varns Street 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-1068 (503)524-0994 (503)639-2529 Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith Mark F. Mahon John Benneth 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 11310 SW 91st Court 15550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 (503)524-6325 (503)524-4550 (503)639-0894 Kathie Kaliio Christy Herr Linda Masters Pat Wyden 12940 SW Glacier Lily Drive 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)524-5200 (503)590.1970/(503)624-8009 (503)620-7662 Ed Howden Barbara Sattler Scott Russell Sue 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Road 11250 0 SW 8 Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard,OR 97223 Sca 1125d SW 8972 Avenue (503)524-6040 PPoos-2 34 97056 Tigard, OR 97223 (503)684-9303 (503) 543-2434 Bonne&Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SWTwekesbury Drive 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 590-0461 (503) 590-0523 (503) 590-4297 • Karl Swanson 11410 SW Ironwood Loop - Tigard,OR 97223 (503)590-3369 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feel, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all the names on this list. 11110VMpjUWuaSICIY4notICrust 11 Mar Vl :t, 1 . a! ginirr ejmn,imi,: -,- . 1 ::, 111 iffiki , 1.-lio , .7.71--WIVIA. -'4"(---\, i I 1 tsp-i- .1.. .._7-- 77-ii • v7. in ii3 I; a ? A . , ,, - rJ 't- II. iiiirreVe€41/41 ji. 4 mli2 i b. gr.intAm.,.44 iur -,- ., _ , , ;4.. "42.7. ovi)wpro12:fitii.i. F:4 4..4611N1:: .1018._. -n.. R19 s'\.Nk ....1A, . JV 1 �i o 1 11•,1 1 J,11_. 444,11 Of I 'Mr nik% r. .62i-ur i . t r- .--, -., 2r , --, _,---/ , ,,, ; „,„:. LL, .,. ) 5 ,,-;.11 p kI U 7- , 15 C 2 r U 1 i ` r i di July 26 , 1999 Room Use Application f'►PPrication veaciline I� Event date: August 12 , 1999 Hours of event: From6 : 30 r/pm To8; 00 a /pm (Must include.any set-up and clean-up time) Organization/individual requesting use: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Mailing address: 3320 NE Sandy Blvd - City; Portland Zip Code:9 7 0 6 2 Contact person: Jeff Tainer Day phone:236-1001 Evening phone691-1090 Person who will pick up room key from the Police Department Pete Vrontakis Type of event Site Development Review Classification (see policies):Ci ty Business Size of group: 16 (Approximation) (Note: If group exceeds size stated, the function may be terminated). FACILITIES REQUESTED 14 Town Hall Room ❑ Red Rock Creek Conference Room 0 Richard M. (Dick) Brown Auditorium 0 Water Building Conference Room Room Rental Fees: • Room Capacity Class 1 and 2 Class 3 Class 4 Town Hall Room 90 No fee $20.00/hr $25.00/hr Red Rock Creek Conference Room 20 No fee $10.00/hr $15.00/hr Richard M. (Dick) Brown 150 No fee $30.00/hr $35.00/hr Auditorium Water Building Conference Room 12 No fee $10.00p/hr $15.00/hr Please see the Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard Meeting Rooms to determine what class your evont/meeting falls into. Building Rental Fee $ 0 . 00 Cleaning/Security Deposit: A cleaning/security deposit is required for parties, receptions and potlucks. The cleaning/security deposit must be paid ten (10) days in advance of your event The deposit is as follows: Groups of 80 or less $150.00 Groups of more than 80 $250.00 Deposit Amount $ 0. 00 Please forward the application, rental fee, and/or deposit to: City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223. Please read the Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard Meeting Rooms and the following information prior to signing the Room Use Application. I agree to protect, indemnify, and defend the City, its authorized agents, elected and appointed officials, and all employees against any and all claims as a result of persons attending any function at the facility. This provision includes any expenses incurred by the City defending such claim. I further understand the City, its elected and appointed officials, and all employees will not be held responsible for any lost or stolen articles, clothing, etc., as a result of persons attending any function in the building. I have. ead the Policies and Procedure 'Reserving City of Tigard Meeting Roomy I the information on the reverse side of this form. I further agree to abide by t, olicies and Procedures as well as the or ices of the City of Tigard and I accept responsibility for any violations as they may pertain to the application. Signature 46/44 Date Rental Periods The City of Tigard Meeting Rooms are available for reservation Monday through Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Reservations To allow many different groups an opportunity to use the facilities, repetitive room requests will be reviewed on a monthly basis through the application process. Priority room use is given in ascending order beginning with Class 1. Please see the Policies and Procedures for Reserving City of Tigard Meeting Rooms to determine what class your function fits into. All efforts will be made to keep the room schedule intact once reservations are made; however, the City retains the right to cancel or relocate a meeting upon 24 hours notice. Rental Fee and Cleaning]Security Deposit If a rental fee is required, it must be received prior to application deadline, which is noted on front of application. If a refundable cleaning/security deposit is required, it must be posted no less than fourteen (14) days in advance of the reservation date. The amount of the cleaning/security deposit is based on whether food and/or beverage will be served, and the size of the group. Cleaning supplies and equipment must be provided by the user. Please see the policies regarding room use for details on the return of the deposit FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Room Use: Approved D Disapproved ❑ Date Administrative Services Manager Date logged Date Applicant notified Date P.D. notified Date rental fee paid _ Amt$__ Rec# Date deposit paid Amt$_ Rec# Checklist received Yes❑ No CI Any unusual cleaning or damage? Yes ❑ No 0 If yes, please document and attach document to application. Date of refund Amt$ ____ H.\000SIROOMUSEWIASTERS\ROOM USE APPLICATION.00C Revised 12/98 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, Jeff Tainer , do affirm that I MD (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Site Development Review affecting the land located €( 6 X*Vit3titrUttA i K Il iiiXatI(4)XatItififiX 1A im4 xegtso) Adlacent to 10900 S.W. 69th Parkway, Tigard , Oregon , and did on the 22nd day of July , 19 99 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Site Development Review application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at The Curb Cut of Lot 3 . Way Lee Subdivision, in The Cit. of Ti• ard Count of Washin:ton and State of Ore:on. (state location you posted notice on property) 40 / 74,e_.--- Sig . f - (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 21st day of July , 19 99. OFFICIAL s Y—�' b ,,. MARGARET D.CARPENTER c .'""� coMMlsslor�i No 23223 NOTARY P LIC OF OREGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 9,2003 My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) F AME OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NAME uric oT 'aTem dba lank or 1Sort-lan3 (TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Site Development REview Name of Applicant/Owner C. • . • -• • •. :. • . • '• . 55 I Address or General Location of Subject Property: ' • l ac ent to: VII 1 S.W. 69th Parkway • • - a• I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): T. a — • '_—► •_—. __••it • u. • r• __• = /-1 • •MUnpou- --- ------ rt:tognpaffW"ast AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ss. City of Tigard ) 1; Jeff Tainer , being duly sworn, depose and say that on July 21 , 19 99, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 10900 S.W. 69th Parkway Tigard, Oregon a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 2425 N.E. 50th Avenue , Portland, Oregon with postage prepaid thereon. Si r4.. (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the 21st day of Ju 1 y , 19 99 OFFICIAL SEAL ('�•;a: MARGARET D.CARPENTER NOTARY PUBLIC-0OREGON 'min"' COMMISSION NO.323223 1_K7_ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 9,2003 NOTARY PL BLIC OF • •EG N My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME:_ Bank of Salem dba Bank of o tl and I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Site Development RPViPw I Name of Applicant/Owner: 11• s • • -is • •. • • • •• _ •• I Address or General Location of Subject Property-Adjacent to : 10900 S .W. 6•th Par way Ti L Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s):Ta x A • • La IT • . • „ o. 151 • -s • I h Aloes\pa tt�Miastersuffmail.mst ) � 3320 NI SANDY BLVD. • PORTLAND. OR 97232 ofIorLd (503) 236-1(X)1 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Way W. Lee 5210 S.E. 26(1' Ave. Portland, OR 97205 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69" Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM • Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /J A /(rte ki./✓7✓4�: Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board SCHEDULE A, Page No. 2 Legal Description, Continued Order No. : 263798w PARCEL I: A portion of Lot 3, according to the duly filed plat of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, in the City of Tigard, filed December 24, 1975, in Plat Book 35, Page 42, Records of the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 and WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222.14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 03' 14" West along said East line, 472.63 feet to the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, 188 .63 feet along the South line of Lot 3; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, 5.00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West along the South line of Lot 3, 101.48 feet to the West line of said Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, 463 .38 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295 .96 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Theodore E. Baxter and Judy H.C. Baxter, husband and wife, by Deed recorded September 1, 1992 as Recorder' s Fee No. 92060810, said portion being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222.14 feet to the true point, of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 13' 14" West along said East line, 416.29 feet to the point that bears North 0° 03' 14" East, 56.34 feet from the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West parallel with the South line of Lot 3, a distance of 290.76 feet to the North right-of-way of SW 69th Avenue and the West line of Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, a distance of 412 .04 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295.96 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A parcel of land in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most Westerly Southwest corner of Lot 3, WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County, Oregon; thence South 89° 49' 10" East, along the South line of said Lot 3, a distance of 101.48 feet; thence South 00° 10' 50" West along lot line of said Lot 3, a distance of 5.00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, a distance of 101 .48 feet; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, a distance of 5.00 feet to the point of beginning. FROM : PETE UROHTIHKIS PHONE NO. : 3931377 Jul. 21 1y'J''J Ud:2UHI•I I-•1 • JUL-20-99 03 :58 PM , Aw- — —;1' p ap —I `L' - 0 5800-h It- -•e 1► Q •JIda I 23 MP 8 I I C.S Re• 1213•3 ) • • + ° r ra WA 43C0 4301 %tit os .• w 0 s ► I I° I ' 0 It fo ♦fI 1.>,,# '2 C /s ° / 0 r AP . 0.0 ‘44 t.r ,1ttg440 /' A Illi ?.4 a WC• � t % i .1 •RI s49A:. 461 { o 85Q4 1 7 96 Y .r7 AC. I _ y x + 1 J IF .. -r t".. w seize'c $c1 1 L:NeT++o„us STOTT CC. 53--.2,i. .^•' ,r5 ,->r 6507 • ra E�. 5503 0�A, ++ , ; ;e 1.J$Ac 3 0 1 6506 2 3 gol oI 9) • Y b. a C V \iv A f i k 0 al -A • r r , A a • 48 Id --. r -,...____ _A • fy�T / y 4�` TR ., a w 6505 .IC- INITW.3I ? ha it . Moo�w t POINT 0I alo i�a V. f' r Y 41'see w Wpl(Mr MI/61 Rs —I I SEE MAP IS I 36DA THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISES,AND THE COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS,IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,AND LOCATIONS ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. "}'I'' . . g I_ 3320 NF,SANDY RLVI). • POIZTLANI). OR 97232 of Mittand (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 2364)810 July 20, 1999 Portland General Electric 121 S.W. Salmon St. Portland, OR 97204 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. I S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69111 Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, V/747,. .,, / "` if-7,- //�d4/7,,d? Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board . . u gL3320 NE SANDY BLVD. • PORTANI). OR 97232 of 7 Qrda d (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Portland General Electric Attn: H.L. Clark, Manager 621 S.W. Alder St. • Portland, OR 97205 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69th Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. ' Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1, /Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board 1FII) .3 3320 NE.SANDY 1)LVI). • PORTLAND. OR 972:12 lJ[S ns WSLld d (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Benenson 6811i Parkway P.O. Box 15144 Worchester, MA 01615 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69t1i Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /�' // ete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board 3320 NI'.SANDY IILVI). • PORTLAND, OR 97232 `"i No}tand (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Donald E. Pollock 1834 S.W. 58Ib Ave., #202 Portland, OR 97221 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No, R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69t11 Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /A4,,,4� i ir--- ,F•��✓'.,,4-il Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board , Bank3320 NE SANDY RLV11. • PORTLAND. Olt 97232 diIir ancd (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Steven P. Louie 11920 S.W. Viewcrest Court Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. IS 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69`(' Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 79747,04,—.0,4 ,L y,4,lrP,e is Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board . . B, 3320 NE SANDY ISLVI). • PORTLAND. 011 97232 .1__ E1r d (503) 230-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 , July 20, 1999 Mark Desai 14320 S.W. 134t1i Drive Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69t1i Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, %/7"74--,„,,,c_./4 Ar— Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board )�� :1320 NE SANDY BLVD. • PORTLAND. OR 97232 of Edatarj (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Hi Hat, Inc. 11530 S.W. Barbur Blvd. Portland, OR 97219 , RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69th Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM , Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, fr/.61/7",-'e; /C r" lr.Gc1✓7",-'ice e .te Vrontakis Chairman of the Board 1 J 3320 NE SANDY BLVD. • PORTLAND, OR 97232 affrbirtand (503) 236-1(X)1 • FAX (503) 236-0810 , July 20, 1999 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. I S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69th Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, /J // —71.1;r7;:t....-A-Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board ,. - ., J�J J 3320 NE SANDY RIND. • PORTLAND. OH 07232 oft ftlanj d (503) 236-1001 • PAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Jhcb Properties, LLC 11460 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 691' Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, l would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM , Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4#- k67A1f; Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board , 41.n 3320 NE SANDY RIND. • PORTLAND. OR 972:12 oirrtnifj jd (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Craig Hopkins 7430 S.W. Varns Street Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. I S I36AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69111 Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, * /t e- !i/�,✓//� Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board . . . . . 1 3 3320 NE SANDY BLVD. • I'UKTLAND, Oli 97232 artrf lland (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Mark F. Mahon 11310 S.W. 915` Court , Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. l S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69ih Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, 1 would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ff�� 7 z: .,% 4.,- !/,4y✓I/reiJ Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board L.3 3320 NE SANDY nLVU. • PoRTLANU, ON 97232 o rtia j d (503) 236-I 001 • FAX (503) 23(i•O8I O July 20, 1999 Pat Wyden 8122 S.W. Spruce Street Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 691"Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board 6 k 3320 NE SANDY 11LVU. • PORTLAND, OR 97232 of'Poniard (503) 236-1001 • FAX (503) 236-0810 July 20, 1999 Sue Rorman 11250 S.W. 82nd Avenue Portland, OR 97223 RE: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1 S 136AD-06505 Adjacent to 10900 S.W 69115 Parkway, Tigard, Oregon (See attached legal description and map) Dear Interested Party: Bank of Salem dba Bank of Portland is considering the purchase and development of the property described above. We are considering proposing a site development review at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 12, 1999 Town Hall Room 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. 1 look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)393-1377 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Pete Vrontakis Chairman of the Board „:rletroScan/Washington (OR) 4 Owner :Portland General Electric Parcel :R0279549 Site : 10955 SW 69Th Ave Tigard 97223 Xfered . Mail : 121 SW Salmon St Portland Or 97204 Price . Use : 3992 Misc,Assessed By Dept Of Revenue Tot Assd . Census : Tract : 307.00 Block : 1 MapGrid: 655 H2 RefPar#: 1S136AD 06300 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BIdgSF: Ac: 6.49 Owner : H L Clark Mgr P G E Parcel : R0279558 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 621 SW Alder St Portland Or 97205 Price .• Use : 3992 Misc,Assessed By Dept Of Revenue Tot Assd . Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06390 Bedrtn : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac : .09 Owner : Way W Lee Parcel :R0279594 , Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 5210 SE 26Th Ave Portland Or 97202 Price . Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd :$936,920 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06502 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac : 1.49 Owner : Way W Lee General Parcel :R0279601 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 5210 SE 26Th Ave Portland Or 97202 Price . Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd :$573,810 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: i RefPar#: 1S136AD 06503 Bedrm : Bth : YB: Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac: 1.39 Owner : Desai Mark Parcel : R0279610 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered : 06/18/98 Mail : 14320 SW 134Th Dr Tigard Or 97224 Price : $435,000 Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd : $155,230 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06504 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac: .77 Owner : Benenson 68Th Parkway Parcel :R0284597 Site : 11308 SW 68Th Pkwy Tigard 97223 Xfered : 02/28/96 Mail : PO Box 15144 Worcester Ma 01615 ” Price : $11,750,000 Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd : $5,847,320 Census : Tract : 307.00 Block : 1 MapGrid: 655 H2 ReJPar#: 1S136DA 00100 Bedrm : Bth : YB: 1989 Gar: Pool: BIdgSF: Ac: 9.91 Owner :Pollock Donald E Parcel :R0284613 Site : 10995 SW 69Th Ave Tigard 97223 Xfered . Mail : 1834 SW 58Th Ave#202 Portland Or 97221 Price : $200,000 Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd : $348,960 Census : Tract : 307.00 Block : 1 MapGrid: 655 H2 RefPar#: 1S136DA 00200 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac :2.13 Owner : Louie Steven P Et Al Parcel :R0284622 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered :01/08/98 Mail : 11920 SW Viewcrest Ct Tigard Or 97224 Price . Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd :$382,820 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136DA 00600 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac :2.29 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. y.,IetroScan/Washington (OR) 1 Owner : Hi Hat Inc Parcel :R028463I Site : 11530 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 Xfered . Mail : 11530 SW Barbur Blvd Portland Or 97219 Price . Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd : $696,960 Census : Tract : 307.00 Block : 1 MapGrid: 655 62 RefPar#: 1S136DA 00700 Bedrm : Bth : YB: Gar: Pool: BIdgSF: Ac : .88 Owner : Way W Lee General Contractor Inc Parcel :RI 196930 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 5210 SE 26Th Ave Portland Or 97202 Price : $284,992 Use :2002 Vacant,Commercial Tot Assd : $413,210 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1 S 136DA 02400 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: BIdgSF: Ac :4.45 Owner : Desai Mark Parcel : R1325649 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered : 06/18/98 Mail : 14320 SW 134Th Dr Tigard Or 97224 Price : $435,000 Use : 2002 Vacant,Commercial Tot Assd : $40,530 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06700 Bedrm : Bth : YB: Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac: .25 Owner : Tigard City Of Parcel : R1381392 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Price . Use : 9152 Gov,City Tot Assd . Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1 S 136DA 02401 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool: , BldgSF: Ac: 1.93 Owner :Tigard City Of Parcel : R1381409 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . • Mail : 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Price . Use : 9152 Gov,City Tot Assd . Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06506 Bedrm : Bth : YB: Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac: .15 Owner : Jhcb Properties Llc Parcel :R2004557 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered :07/16/98 Mail : 11460 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard Or 97223 Price . Use : 2012 Com,Improved Tot Assd : $2,221,660 Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar#: 1S136AD 06507 Bedrm : 5 Bth : YB: 1990 Gar: Pool: BldgSF: 3,250 Ac : 2.79 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. M E T R O S C A N Reference Farm Washington (OR) Owner Address Phone Ref Number Benenson 68Th Parkway 11308 SW 68Th Pkwy Tigard 97223 6 Desai Mark *No Site Address* 11 Desai Mark *No Site Address* 5 H L Clark Mgr P G E *No Site Address* 2 Hi Hat Inc 11530 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 503-246-4055 9 Jhcb Properties Llc *No Site Address* 14 Louie Steven P *No Site Address* 8 Pollock Donald E 10995 SW 69Th Ave Tigard 97223 503-292-4373 7 Portland General Electric 10955 SW 69Th Ave Tigard 97223 503-246-6699 1 Tigard City Of *No Site Address* 503-526-2200 12 Tigard City Of *No Site Address* 503-526-2200 13 Way W Lee General Contracto *No Site Address* 10 Way W Lee General *No Site Address* 4 Way W Lee *No Site Address* 3 The Information Provided Is Deemed Re1iableA But Is Not Guaranteed. *******************k**** * Current * Sale Statistics ************************************************************************* * Average Sale Price * Average Loan Amount * * * Number of Sales in last year : 1 * Number of sales in last 6 months : 0 * * * Note: Average Sale Price and Loan Amounts are calculated on full * value sales within the last year. ************************************************************************* ******************* * Farm Statistics * ******************* ******************************************* * Owner Occupied : 0 * Absentee Owner : 14 * * 1 * Average Square Footage : 3250 * Average # of bedrooms : 5 * Average # of Bathrooms : 0.00 * Average year built : 1989 * * ******************************************* The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ******************************* * Search Parameters * ******************************* * Washington (OR) * 07/14/99 * * 15:24:51 ******************************* Reference Parcel Number. . .14 1S136DA 00100 1S136DA 00200 1S136DA 00600 1S136DA 00700 1S136DA 02400 1S136DA 02401 1S136AD 06300 1S136AD 06390 1S136AD 06502 1S136AD 06503 1S136AD 06504 1S136AD 06506 1S136AD 06507 1S136AD 06700 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 548 NE 15th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 (503) 284-2142 FAX (503) 284-4162 Bank of Portland July 15 , 1999 ATTN: Jeff Tainer 3320 NE Sandy Blvd. Portland, OR 97232 Escrow No . : 263798w RE : Way to Bank of Portland Property . An escrow has been established in our office involving the above property. I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself as the escrow officer handling your transaction. I am enclosing a copy of the preliminary title report covering the subject property for your review prior to closing. Please note that at time of closing we will be removing exception numbers 7, 11 and 12 . I will be calling you to make an appointment upon receipt of all the documents required for the closing. At that time I will provide you with the amount of funds required for the escrow . Your funds will need to be in the form of a cashier' s or certified check payable to Oregon Title Insurance Co . I am enclosing a notice concerning funds delivered to escrow. We will also require your identification for the notary, preferably a current driver' s license . Your attention to the above details will help us proceed toward a timely and well-coordinated closing. Thank you for all of your assistance . Very truly yours, i = l' Theresa L. Marshall Escrow Officer F OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Northeast Branch 1548 NE 15th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 (503)284-2142 FAX (503)284-4162 SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FOR ISSUING TITLE INSURANCE Date Prepared: July 14, 1999 Oregon Title Insurance Company 1548 NE 15th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 Attn: Theresa L. Marshall Reference: ORDER NO : 263798w PARTY REF: BANK OF PORTLAND PROP ADDR: OTHER REF: Tax Account No. R279629, Map No. 1S136AD-06505 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is prepared to issue title insurance, insuring title of the land shown on Schedule A, subject to the exceptions shown on Schedule B. The proposed policy or policies and indorsements are shown on Schedule A. Issuance of the policy or policies is conditioned on payment of the full premiums, and on recordation of satisfactory instruments establishing the interests of the parties to be insured. This report is based on the condition of title as of the effective date shown on Schedule A. Matters arising after the effective date may affect this report. New exceptions will appear for matters arising through the proposed transaction. Any change in the amount of insurance or type of coverage may cause the premium to change. This report is for the exclusive use of the principals to the contemplated transaction, and the company does not have any liability to any third parties. Until all necessary documents are placed of record, the company reserves the right to cancel, amend or supplement this preliminary title report for any reason. Any questions concerning this preliminary title report may be directed to: Theresa L. Marshall SCHEDULE A, Page No. 1 Order No. 263798w 1. The effective date of this preliminary title report is 5:00 P.M. on July 6, 1999 2. The policies and indorsements to be issued and the related charges are: Policy/Indorsement Description Charge ALTA Standard Owner's for $105, 000.00 472.50 Government Service Fee 20.00 3. Fee simple interest in the land described inithis report is owned, at the effective date, by: A WAY W. LEE, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. , an Oregon corporation 4. The land referred to in this report is described as follows: (Continued) SCHEDULE A, Page No. 2 Legal Description, Continued Order No. : 263798w PARCEL I: A portion of Lot 3, according to the duly filed plat of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, in the City of Tigard, filed December 24, 1975, in Plat Book 35, Page 42, Records of the County of Washington and State of Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 and WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222 .14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 03' 14" West along said East line, 472 .63 feet to the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, 188.63 feet along the South line of Lot 3; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, 5 .00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West along the South line of Lot 3, 101.48 feet to the West line of said Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, 463.38 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295.96 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Theodore E. Baxter and Judy H.C. Baxter, husband and wife, by Deed recorded September 1, 1992 as Recorder' s Fee No. 92060810, said portion being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Northeast corner of Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence South 0° 03' 14" West along the East line of said Lot 3 of WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, 222.14 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 0° 13' 14" West along said East line, 416 .29 feet to the point that bears North 0° 03' 14" East, 56 .34 feet from the initial point of said WAY LEE SUBDIVISION; thence North 89° 49' 10" West parallel with the South line of Lot 3, a distance of 290.76 feet to the North right-of-way of SW 69th Avenue and the West line of Lot 3; thence North 0° 40' 00" West along the West line of Lot 3, a distance of 412 .04 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89° 20' 00" East, 295.96 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL II: A parcel of land in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, said parcel being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the most Westerly Southwest corner of Lot 3, WAY LEE SUBDIVISION, a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County, Oregon; thence South 89° 49' 10" East, along the South line of said Lot 3, a distance of 101.48 feet; thence South 00° 10' 50" West along lot line of said Lot 3, a distance of 5.00 feet; thence North 89° 49' 10" West, a distance of 101.48 feet; thence North 00° 10' 50" East, a distance of 5 .00 feet to the point of beginning. Order No. 263798w Effective Date: 5:00 P.M. on July 6, 1999 SCHEDULE B, Page No. 1 Except for the items properly cleared through closing, the proposed policy or policies will not insure against loss or damage which may arise by reason of the following: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2 . Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3 . Easements, liens or encumbrances or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records; unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4 . Any lien, or right to a lien, for taxes, worker's compensation, services, labor, equipment rental or material, heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5 . Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 6 . Taxes for the fiscal year 1999-00, a lien in an amount yet to be determined, but not yet payable. 7. Municipal liens, if any, imposed by the City of Tigard. NOTE: An inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk, and subsequent advice will follow concerning the actual status of such liens. No search has been made or will be made for water, sewer or storm drainage charges unless the City claims them as liens and reflects them on its lien docket on or before the date of closing. Buyers should check with the appropriate City bureau or water and sewer district and obtain a final reading. Such charges are not adjusted in escrow. 8. The subject property lies within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is subject to the levies and assessments thereof. 9. Lack of a right of access to and from said land. The subject property does not appear of record to have access to a public street or way. (Continued) SCHEDULE B, Page No. 2 Exceptions, Continued Order No. : 263798w 10. An easement created or disclosed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded February 5, 1976 in Book 1067 Page 280 In favor of City of Tigard, a municipal corporation of Oregon For Sanitary sewer Affects A strip of land 15.00 feet in width 11. Mortgage, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated October 28, 1976 Recorded October 29, 1976 in Book 1122 Page 659 Mortgagor(s) Way W. Lee, General Contractor, Inc. , an Oregon corporation, of the County of Multnomah in the State of Oregon Mortgagee(s) Securities-Intermountain, Inc. , an Oregon corporation Amount $1,600,000.00 Loan Number Not disclosed (Affects Parcel I) 12. Assignment of Leases and Rents given as additional security to the Mortgage shown next above, Recorded . October 29, 1976 in Book 1122 Page 666 13. Rights of tenants, as tenants only, in unrecorded leaseholds. NOTE: Taxes for 1998-99, paid in full. Original Amount $1,041.32 Tax Amount $1,042.32 Code No. 023.81 Key No. R279629 Map No. 1S136AD-06505 Mark A. Stelling, Title Officer MJR/MJM/mlw/mlw cc: Bank of Portland Attn: Jeff Tainer I A 3 Iso P �` pc • 0 • 4200 0 1.Z. e 0 5800-MI f--40 >' 500 0 23 - 81 �,.� • (C.S No. 12813 ) no D e o p1 . N u n 94.25 n' 0 O l �T 4300 4301 01 o5 — — .„,„i z eo 3y l20...--- ,z.,... 4;:. e o �• p4-`t .....c. ' 7200 • ° , L1 6 4 O O .16.40.9 6 35 30 / A^� f ° 181•6 s err, ' 2 Z � 0 /► er6°24 90 'r A 40r16 40-7 I a, L � x 6300 •1 `r' t2 6504 � t5�Li 6.494c. S • +_.. .774C. hell °c..:". A I = A / y1 �Op c 1 V A 6 5p ' 4p tr .��� ? 1 0 �e v. 1.."' m 119-21'c 2966% t SOUTHMLI INE THOMAS SIUII DLC. 53---za„ _ 1111 1_3 .. 83 �....m.r � ■ # ^�• .c '' 6507 I 0 # 0 l� 1 � • 2.79.0. \ � .0 . ml'. 1 #33 0 5 • 6503 01 - g 7v 1.39.4c 3 ~ '~ IP' r A.Y 6506 • V • - Y 2 .; rA A • g • toi W. `l w rn oo J A I .1 as'41 to"V -.�_/ zso.ns / -• .- .'� 21 F` 6505 37.4C. POINT .0 M 01'IG 31� / 43 .A,4•6 Q 1 "2 I::... gel 1 ' 11.48 6' �p.� ��r 1 tzw?EASEMENT 323/51 6-7.63 iitl i`C� �� 14133.41.31111 4443 1 1 SEE MAP IS I 36DA THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISES,AND THE N COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS,IF ANY, IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,AND LOCATIONS CAN - ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. PEACOCK 3 TREE PRESERVATION P.O. Box 19783 • Portland, Oregon 97280 \ f Telephone (503) 248-0803 • • Specialists in tree care RECEIVED PLANNING • Bank-ofPortland Februaayg ?00 FEB 1 0 2000 she- Rete Vrontykis CITY OF TIGARD F.O.Box-$1' Salem-,_O 97 U • Dear Vrontillds, I-- inspected the trees- on- the .vim tat Ian SW 6gth Ave. in Tigard Mere the propose& Rank Frortiami will be built. The tree= removal plan indicate& that -trees need tc be removed in=' for the buikting a parking tot to be .buitt: Four of;the trees- to- be removed are Tess-than twelve -inches in diameter. The surveyor of the -land founff that there-are- forty trees with a diameter of twieve - or large. 1. :placed_ red tape on trees-to- be removed per the per-_provided to- me. Pack with project and please call me-fur tan, be of further assistance. %Ar ly, 1e Stephen T. Peacock Certified "Optimizing Tree Health Through Modern Arboriculture" nazi& December 3, 1999 CITY OF TIG OREGON Pete Vrontakis Board Chairman Bank of Salem P.O. Box 847 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Incompleteness letter as of 12/3/99 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: The City of Tigard received your application submittal for Site Development Review at property located at 1S136AD06505. After a preliminary review of the submittal items, Staff has determined that the following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete and scheduled for review: 1) Address the Site Development Review standards in Chapter 18.360. in narrative application. 2) Provide property owner original signature/authorization for Land Use application. 3) Provide gross area of parcels and percentage of lot coverage for new development. 4) Address Chapter 18.725, Environmental performance standards. Describe location and type of any noise sources. 5) Confirm whether or not there are any existing easements on the subject parcels in this application and any easements on adjacent parcels that may be affected by the proposed development. 6) Address fire truck access and minimum access width requirements. Show proposed lighting plan. 7) Provide a Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan prepared by a certified arborist as required in Section 18.790.30 of the CDC. Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 8) Provide public facilities plans including the following: Grading Plan (show existing and proposed contours and relationship to adjacent parcels and, Utility plan (showing Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage and Water Quality facilities, proposed water lines, existing and proposed fire hydrants). 9) Provide a vicinity plan with locations of buildings and structures on adjacent parcels and distances from the proposed building and subject property lines. 10) Show centerline of street clearly on plans. 11) Please confirm project name. All cases in the computer must be tied to a project name. The Site Development Review case creates the project name for all other cases to be built from (Building and Engineering), therefore, it is very important that we have an accurate project name at this stage. While name changes may be permitted at a later date, there may be a fee charged to cover the administrative costs of making changes in our computer systems. Once the information listed above has been submitted, staff can deem the application complete and schedule it for review. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Sincerely, aren Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Way W. Lee, General Contractor 1999 Planning correspondence file SDR1999-00026 file I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr99-26.doc Page 2 of 2 PRE -. APPLI CATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD �. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ctnuraty Derfopment [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(61 Months) Shaping Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: (2y/—Ti STAFF AT PRE-APP: J APPLICANT: I+v4C x*- cptC Vers,The{tzi.S) AGENT: Phone:( 1 533—5c35—Sz--"O Phone: ( l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: ,A 'c t'� S- C�°l"" . TAX MAP(SI/LOT#[S]: NECESSARY APPLICATION'S]: 5 ,/€p1 ,A AAA/ (St ' J CG 5 L�,E PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Iro-rS&v=t- -P 31C c nCC ft-4Z-1)t- L.6c 46 k SP4r4k 4 pA i. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: c I IL CiptiMAp;(2c,4cU ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: G--9 C.I.T.AREA: FACILITATOR: "' edi PHONE: (5031 P ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Moj MINIMUM LOT SIZE: — sq. ft. Alcefage lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: 45 ft. Setbacks Front ft. Side /fit. Rear—ft. Corner i ft. from street. MAX-MUM-SIT COVERAGE: 5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: IS %. [Refer to Code Section 18. ,1.,ic6XS ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS gieSZosat, 0—tO-cc (r x)Se-ttPcX MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS__ • STREET:• from the centerline of • • ESTAB ISHED AREAS: T. •m • LOWE- INTENSITY ZO► - feet, along the site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) • SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; Z All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and Z The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ \k,``�` = • V l(COD PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 2-7 � oats C 34`160 er-----4440)- Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): _Ofik SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: 2 7( t c (2_(4-am ) Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): i 5 NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: rAIPtiCOS fRc. ;4.1- Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. (a/21,44,cr 6ETr, D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Zug WLK5 Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. A C Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can tq-�jr , be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. 1!c�' [Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) �t� Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Y BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: 3c- l . Minimum pavement width: 29- ' v poi All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. 1105 Drive-in use queuing areas: n//A Gegg Q.°-) [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 7 WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.105.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be pr• ided with a loading space. The space ize--a ion s a e as approved by the City E sineer. ' ode Section 18.765.080) /CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.195) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.145) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. /, 9 i r. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: 0-A /LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) . •SENSI/IVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AS, ON SLOPES IN'EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. S . " will attempt to preliminary iden -fy sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conferen - eased on available information. HOW'VER, the responsibility to precisely identi sensiti - ands areas and their boundaries is the res■onsibilit of the aeelicant. Areas •-- 'i• - - definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indic.ted on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or .e _ 's of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 • STEEP SLOP S W t en STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be s emitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code S-ction 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall i clude specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 8.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED EWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated cor idef—that-is a-minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall b- eet, except as allowed in ection 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the -•etated corridor within the developm:nt or project site can be ess than 25 feet in width. In . y case, the average width of the veget.ted corridor shall be a inimum of 25 feet. Re ictions in th- Vegetate Corridor: NO struc ures, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except s allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be wid-ned by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed 'loser than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency er City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for se..rate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separ. e tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI • WATER RESO RCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Co prehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of .ignificant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local W . lands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit de elopment in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood sto age capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and en ance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of wai-r resource areas. Saf- Harbor: The R OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, D ision 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped -nd protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow oi`riore than 1001 -. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by"the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per sec'Cd (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CR EK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEL . Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Ore on Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Cre k, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL 0 MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIA ED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor oundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 EET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unle s modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required nder Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Ripar-an Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. li•ibilit for Ri•arian e-tback in Distar•-• Areas. To FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbe at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetati Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 8 % of the on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site ripari n setback area for the last five years; • That vegetation was not removed contrary to the pro sins of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section ejtREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.EJ /NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32) ✓ -t r.,f t" S14N 9(s nS CODE CHAPTERS 18.350 _ 18.715 _/ 18.795 _/ 18.780 18.330 18.430 18.775 _1 18.730 ./ 18.765 ./ 18.755 7 18.370 18.420 18.797 / 18.745 ./ 18.705 / 18.360 v 18.790 ,/18.800 /IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning OMslon Section ,/NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, appli is an; required to complete and file a subdivision plat namin. re. - ith the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approve - - ation for any subdivision name. Applications will •.t be accepted as complet- . I the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the C. ty of the St____pgivisien ame Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884] .V BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.755] ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: — cccgtoa ZL. -1:LvkS /c L v■r■5 .it frit (1./& _/, DRiv-w( --c;944 t z c S —A —v ski (JUi .�('&c1 '(�fcS�Cat✓• 1 ) PT. �uJ✓}rl is 4;.1/4 //.4 1 a P. w 4 1 f 4 X CA l7 en4 T+r N.-i,,;e. 4 v1r Clr.1 ifm /^rg 4Irif..,.w /If [ O� vide / IL vY ,,,a 1'1'e4,� Tu CP I4nj ,n„r, fir' CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES 4,, ENGINEERING SECTION Q Commufnity Mani. Deve Development Shaping A Better Community IS I 3� AD PUBLIC FACILITIES Is7ScS The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( c to feet from centerline. (07 SUJ (o& 1(91 ( to ? feet from centerline. Mid At-W-44› -fP+A Lt ( ) to feet from centerline. 1 SrAa -v5 ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ( ) stre€ Iprovements will be necessary aloe to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) _ street improvements will be necessary along to include: [1 _ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees • street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) _ street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ _ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ _-foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section In some cases, where stre iprovements or other necessary F c improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) 5W rtI �2° (6.q / 1 (2.) -- - Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located �c(toy> -t�+,5 srrYC. . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to @GAL 4.44 6.1.,.17(,4, —rt) I Water Supply: II The _ � i A c �� W�ld�- rst. - Phone:(503) 2-45 - 3'Yt'l provides public water service in the area of this site. 'This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site ° S 4��►A(1- tZ- kat- pipe ciN-c i — - t it 4SiTG-Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section to pay a fee in-lieu of con: sting an on-site facility provided s, Tic criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ' Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. CITY OF TIQAFIO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section Compliance Agreen (CAP). This permit covers mor€ ensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS EC DBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: .R11-- `-11' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF Phone: [503)639-4171 Fax [503)684-1297 h\patty\nasters\preapp eng (Master section:preapp-r mst) 01-Sept-98 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes — Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: .V� (�c5 Date: (2*-1 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed • Written summary of proposal • Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1" x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): COY Vicinity Map Er Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan 2-- Existing Conditions Map Er Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Er Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan EY Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan 0 Site Development Plan 2' Architectural Drawings Cis) la-- Landscape Plan E" Sign Drawings E7'- Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on e type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES (O COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map L G .?0,4 'e 2 Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site Cl • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 'ppCC�w i-csaovAi sea . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is`available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. luau-NOM The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site p an. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: l "\ i2OICkr C1TY-OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PER3`ONAOLDING PRE-APP.MEETIN G PHONE: (5031639.4171 FAX: (5031684-7297 E-MAIL: (staffs first namel@Ci.tigard.or.us is\cu rpin\masters\revised\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 11/26/98 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-flesidentlal Application/Planning Division Section 1 411 1 1995 COMMERCIAL ST. S.E. ■ P.O. BOX 847■SALEM, OR 97308 In r Sal nn (503) 585-5290•FAX (503) 585-7368 January 14, 1999 City of Tigard Tigard, OR Re: Construction of a 3600 sq. ft. office building Applicant is: Bank of Salem Pete Vrontakis, CEO 1995 Commercial SE Salem, OR 97302 503-585-5290 FAX 503-585-7368 We would like to construct a 3600 sq. ft. office building. We would occupy 2400 sq. ft. and lease about 1200 sq. ft. We would need to move an 8" sewer line, construct a new sewer line and manholes. We are several hundred feet from Pacific Highway on S W 69th Ave. Our entrance will be one way. We would exit on existing curb cuts which is now the Carrows lower parking lot. The owner of both properties is Mr. Way Lee. He will provide us with all the necessary easements. There are no driveways across the street. The approximate 2400 sq. ft. will be used as a banking office. The Banks ' hours are Monday thru Friday, 8: 30 AM to 5: 30 PM. We are closed Saturday and Sunday. Bank of Salem is a business bank. We do not have ATMs, drive-in-windows or bankcards. We only make business loans and residential real estate loans. We don't make consumer loans. Our depositors are normally retired citizens who buy form us FDIC insured Certificates of Deposit. We pay some of the highest interest rates in the Portland area. The maturity of the deposits are 6 months, 12 months and 2 years. We see our deposit customers once or twice per year. Our traffic volume would compare with a single dentist office of about 2-3 customers per hour. The property owner is Mr. Way Lee. Tax map and lot number attached. Topographic information attached. $240.00 fee enclosed If you need additional information please call Pete Vrontakis at 503-585-5290. Thank you. IS i ii ✓T".. ��r ,i' 7'A Issue A , =■.r/ 11� wil 0 I , - -- wavalw 9 S 136AD06505 1.114 f 0441111 r 01 \pie III . �iler plopin-III go rOw lik t vii,`P..1 i // // J 011 WI I . / / I V Ir r'4 4 ._.. "1—. A PI ——.Al / ' ' ' L • , , hi,1 ohm am 4, It■ / / a ,E,... i 11101MIAT in______ __ 2 ir. , . 0.411 ref 1 _- ? Ai Ajil / 1 11111 •1 ..............._ Major arterial N .\ 10'interval contours Stream line Text Wash streets Text Mult.streets J Parks.shp \ .� Wetlands W E iiii Lakes, reservoirs,deep ponds ' MEI Marshes,bogs, swamps in River,creek,stream habitats Vegetation s I J Agriculture 4i a_.,; Forest jJJ Meadow j Shrub Lil Urban ®Water Taxlots.shp Topography Map Oregon Title Insurance Company I C e I 2800 a 5LJU3 81 =2 - - 96 9 a 4 50 99.°9 ./� F ^I Z I E s cIt, 200 os Sc _ �, - / g°/ _ I� 2900 1700 1800 / e0 g2gA s - ., ,.j 18 p) A"I a d 51° 1 44 e?O t0 8,° /a al o c 9)p c. 0 2°6 OA' 61.0 I / C.S. 10390 -0 S ST 6 ' j1".R�1 7° I 100 s° 9e 1 95 0 % 5901 p0 PINE STREET 20 ^,' S6,o3 .75Ac 6�EAc p\ (CS + • 4°' A y000 le.S ses°ee'E /' p0 a 9� ° H oT 190w�1e006 a 6e 105 3 190 59 Ac ►/ 7000 X 10 3400 3300 4200 1.0o " / ) -:'11;# • " 23_81 _, 5800-M1 9 90 5 o 5/4C co / (C.S No 128131 ro / '= I /) 80.06 4 -. - - - - 190 .1 a /" N e9°56'3d E/ ,,, 95.2! r-' I h /"7100 2„� 3301 (J'-' r i. I° ��a ° 4300 4301 �' wE,S1 • (95.00)U A ' I I; !I .L. C. • i . p\\\\991No 85 105 '- - -' - ° - ° `2 •8� tea r T 4102 0 Iz0 PIA Z 401� -------- 456v 4 - - - - -S �o - - - c $ r ,61.e5 ° �, as s•� U3 `0661 / i3AOc0 7200 e `v / 0 !� el/e° 91.92 • 36 !0 / {p 0°_ 61. 6 994µ 2« 2 A\ 9C�. •19"." 57°.26 S0� 997°II•!D'E l 4100 1 j1 �` _ 9! 265 " 95 I i SN°20'401Y 4.07 r 1 .si4c. - - �� g*gAc 9° I i 6300 'o Ai 4 4 6504 w'JI 11 6.49 Ac. 7 1 a+ I i .77 AC. 1 )Y i i o I`;W A. a a Ii A� ..'..N-0 0• 0p n / + a� r04 Pc w.e 13 / -I °� `l6 25 . 1° I I 6 _�AW Se t<. " • I ti 0 N 89°20'0 295.99 7 7 1 �� -SOUTH Li NE THOMAS STOTT DLC. 53----9. Lv.j .,1--`>. - 1,\`.4�� 30.63 I I 0 4.5 ( G 1- .4... `40� 6507 1 ` / 2.79 4C. `5'b PG\ 'O 4e:» I Q s o6.`.. /°G ti e /39Ac 6503 w e. 3 .- /+ # n / Y hW X 6506 6506 An s ./5.4c. ry/« v .Aq n/2 / i 6502 2 Z YI C =I 00 w "1VV �, i\ Y rJ 1. w I t. �z� ,° I r--' r • /g R" 9L I ° \ N 99.49 10.9 I S I 36 MAP DA VACATED 290.76 0 IS 136 36DA I �6 7 8'-915{7 o- 650° / / 0'.` - TR B " POINT TLgo, / `-.'s r 1.22 ,`", e79) 1.34 3 O1 46 900°10'50"E '~ / / ZS07 - t,'.r T��e�_.gere.-4..°Z ill 5/ 609a•1•51•W 414.50 L_ 19.5• EASEMENT 323/!1 67.65 3 • Ati1/4 •EE MAP IS I 36DA f -- i i INNO01110161011fteitgifr. ' . SP*091tV I r 3‘1/11•203 / 16452 r / tile- . NEC �IE.e ,Lo7'3 1✓ ` -4/411 t2 540 .. 4 a•,�d 09' E'-Ww// 5.2"• �. ` e• -'�o, r — ,`, i t 691. Nib' '5s'c R ' \ \� t — 'e'G�eiv iviv ettxms'r�Vr ,C ' SJC Cn' \ ' —/5' QPL* d �6�' .tA'.s49- Mtshingles Ca jI :vapor 3 a 5/.97� / It$CBI�' 8D ce• �/ss•so r , � f LieIYEK,69Y GQ?dM�Jt/r 3.LG'?/''A9 c.. ()CI '` ;7V �' '#' O,OREGON `4, 77 . N69"2011 E, 2YS.9ois. .. \ I LEGEA/,O =;• A-40/../A./C)/O i 'ieav.eoo A4a vatide.Vr E�'e.er.o1- .^;r Alo,Ep 0 aET -4%5/-/.e44.,em, i 1 EEA// _.. ' ( , _4z 7_ ll/•lYGCC k S �� O n1 REGISTERED 8 K .� PROF• ; d LAND OR \\ t : 19`' f HA' ERC ' � l� a Ai�•d!%d if/.,Z5tit 74' �..�∎, 54/4°J/eV��� �� � • i �` ----11. ., , 1 � - i x sa"'s' !~- /Gb' APPROVED w. a�-• We P I9 r i !lTIAL �K/T CO-Q""X�/( ► I owtsI�Cl' ri ;--- — ' ' �2'/P r J .vaaey ii V' , v,cor, , a�-'irr.�y "' ,w e s7- 'i•: I AEC. %, rte, £/Af/ICA0 At/Mare,4 q6w 7A.rl.m.t tae/ -- w teAse(VA/Ceit//lf4. .Ki_ A1t+a1111r111NRt 1960 SI w srruv a MAP ,,.._..Aro,m►�taK A. o " -"SO 'derh - - - -may q% , x., -< yam, • N J `Y ! - , :r^ 0• _ . .,� `L_ f '' ` , •4.- •)41 Y. .r�:.‘ t." Ylf^ �:. i 'W �Q. •ay e• .4• .. - 1� .r ,F l.•. s fs. �'�(��• ry��Y1g }� yu k- .?�� R. ks s . �+y–y �. t•• .Y i AV ti•+r - . .r`- AT:6-..-444c 5,-t ,.i..Ci k4....i i.-� �� .f i•,3ta3¢4,:ii,y •.AIL 'i•. ..S. 'ii. y` -x' - - - .,, -�� c_._, --'"r , y+li' r' '�' +•fit �.':..- w, :s �,sr•R�.4 J^:(•, gyp. • .�i• • .Cf ' •S . �:` y + �f�- ..t, •tiY FSs. •i 3l#► r^r1 ..V r"'.a.•. ,A? lit- ..., ...'at..-- •1 . -.4b-v- - 1113e. z 0-x . tit :!-.:.' i;,,,F - . ----- 5°6------- ---- --- - -- --;;C:6 -- .....s.r.'4, 4 - .. •• .... , • -------- - 1---\ c;•••A•V) j ._____ ..„. ... .... • 12 , . .;......12.E oil: : _.---- - ,'- •C'ii/dise*4-•' - -,--e.:e..=.' .ft< i__...j.:I.E.I...1 1,...sf• A i 34V I . ` 4,4,40.,.•• . .:: ?f•A•Z.":44•-•,.' • • Al , _„. LJ DCISTING SEkIER C , " ii 4 , • V". -----7- ' 'OUTLET STRUCTURE "... . ; 4"''.. 1. ,Jr' .; ‘‘ A___ .: v - -111\.''--- FRom 094' ,r,‘. E ':- :'•': r..*4 s" _ J J i''' 4 `": -,t. 0 , .- f;`,7 S - '- '61AA - 1-1-= 41(P-)- ";----• : :. . --- 3° ________•• t,:;rti-•-;" '' • -ss • e -.4. .. .e.. so....---....,, ABANDON SEWER 1-.INE Ill A It ' ' •:-ei i _ e 'c ' 11 Hg EL L , _ • ,,, . _ -11.4410"MAPLE G- - 41C-C13#-2 -- -•/4- - ---t-------__L C..s..4 c) -A-tr_-. . 1 .,. . ,----....._____ -----___- ---, Cups -______ --.:,:.1 :. 0 -_ -, ' '''''' -'-,'.* -,r, -. _ ..,-.: ,t... „,F.,:-ti' •-,.3 -. , , 11 ses? , ,...7 {L.__ , .•': • ;* '4, •.. ',J.( li.'Y : :•.,...."'"1 • .. ■ 300'------_______ r, - • '.v..' •• :;,, '.. • • -10""----. 1W4.1 1Y.•:- 1 - - ------- --- .411•Eliiii .. ... . • 4 I , e 6.s.ri:. • .,. ....,,,_:::4:::.:414 AIN , , -------!,---_____ ■ , • 29$- 'lb ''''''''•••• ' .1. 1211j, 1111,41-97,_. AP' I rA8V4/492.9,,,ogr ,-;•, ,ce -...,/, ..") • ' lir A PI-77;/,'",/,;:///4.7-.1 77,e4r.'Ar10 ,411V 0-0:40:447,404•40, s, • . ,*7'40,0■' cfrI ---............._ ?4 fr., --/ Tor Or •.'i '411 •k E - - ;.1,... . 4 ------- ‘ ,,1 ,-- -7,07-", , rliA-1.,, 25,1,,,f,„:1 ,z94---: : „ ----:. ' --"K4-,-.1.7-' ' ) ----- WALL AT..'96'•■ '0:re: '.. '''.:.'•- • o.- '''.' -:,----- .4 li, I MA.:'i•A". '/4/ /,', 1 Fr40;0 ,:ip- ffr- it 0.i/41190y9. '-' ' '''' ' //' NCE • •.GA / 1 I 68 till s) - x,s„...--..e.• ., •-.. :„. #--•- .1-..41,....• %. L orade "- ' ' --/-- -- 1 '!:-till9001 ti, 'Moe:41.,;19',/,0"...-°' •I " ' ''. ...1..................- .... .... -,-.,-,-- .- --......-..--,, -..r._,-.=.-,.„--• :. A%,_e41•L_l__Al•10,,toy,-4?9, ,3 pyx wa 7yq.g.,......,...•Ns , . - , ,, i.,, , . ,..'"*rtt I- .1. -• - 0..• '-' '*-4.4". \ TN, .46/•111•Eirefffrw,// / " :NO I .* 'wir Ai .,--0,..5-g-1.---. q."':'"dr i 0%40211 ME .- .5A72,..,; -Witr:M. --------";- .0‘-) '- ' . s"4 .3•X'-.. !N.'.q•• •• ' 'I r ' - . - IIPI II %%Neacq't.1(1.„7 Ail i, °•:.sj:1710-/1.#41'A e.°41:f *=.121`i . - 3'..‘ ' RIP-RAP RET. , \..c.„ 11,s v , ,„ ....... -,-411.rle 5 . 1,,r /A ff-/- ,ff.,7,r,: r • ' ----, . ,.„ t---14,..t_as REQ'D / , i ....741;,000,"„s,sm.--.:, s,,-3,... . 4.1. .' ••• -t.••...;' ..LI•or 4•7•••• Y W/A, , .,"A 4&447,1:4 Z, /.',/i , .';;/;.'/, ' / / ' Li0 , ...r- --"`4. / 41 • 1'4 1r All'or• • oll re., :._•-•V /1416 1 :trYlittti-1:r9,, ,,401(A//,:dieEl#g Me z, AIN/ .. ..' ,-, .\' •tiA. ' 131 '%." -' .%.7.- ii.,/;4-1559;ireilk/d/1". #4/1 A.f<111 ,043151:f4gfi 44, •titilk-t OP '''''"•'' '*:-• . ' X.01:C - . , rwel 293 • -• N ,t AD C: lirr IT/ •for. -•• Er 1E,V 24 4 3 V//:4/ ,44.N -. ,.. ;vim eir -;lawi 292 . . 4,p, L ,A.,..140,,,,,s, ,., _*, 1 -, .. 4•41,,,, ,g im„, -• ....- io, F.,,cr. , iiit \ / 1 A AI Aire,..:00 ip,.."-civRiLipsii. ----,efro .00,00 . -...., ,,,&-....-„ ,fr.f.0.4.11.-. MAN0)...i. :ilk Wirdezi`c,' /1 -020tr..oill■ • 4-412.:7-.. rsav :Veil 1.16210 „BA? i • . ..,. ..,.,),, ...,,.:,,zo v.3_.-...- ,... v AIM Nilkir___.., ,,■.=774 4,, 4:,;..,,,..: .11=eff.7/":71 111:31:. ... . mi- A 1 29mmimg° 291 do,lix. /92._41ZArkir.4. i-ki,.,10 ki it, '-",i:IP-40r - :. /AL-- .,..., .fa' , ;":1::,•%,1=_.= 1 WIr 07K;,7/v w • INtliiir.litilMatir.7 A/Anent:4z 0.=11Q. Po. e r, io Jr. • 0 . . ■1. tir ...• ' NE /i." • .1 - '' -..-'00' 2 005 t 0 ,' .1441.4k4 • ....ef ... / . - . 6- - 0,4,.-cr loomp kzis.■■ ifilit,1 ,...., ...__ , rfrevxm. 4,_; , • .4- ,, 4, 40, , ,-, • in ,,,„,1,2, rt, MA t.-0 'ciII,i' vt: ..3, C/J. CN4). ' a) / , i ,4.., ,,' ...,I,' ...?. • - 9.4,,41 - - - - - - 4-c9. - ri, IN 11=11111=0 98.00'_F--• ., .4. F-- Alkci, 4_,,.. ,,,... ..., , ...., 4......„,„4.....0„..40,„ . .. ipg, ,16 RIP-RAF'TO '' -------..--- ,. - ,, r. - . . ..ii 0 0 -...:.•.0 0)0 .‘"Alk-400 ' RIP-RAP '' • I, 1 a _ • S=0.0101,V,s: 0,011,017, ..,% .. .14-14., is a\ 0 e 16-PIRE ,,:. ,..):„ , /..„ :. ,,V1. ,a• ,„/.,/ -r,t c.) - our LET smucTuRE. ' .:' .... Na)1.6 //44,%/fsk,k5;ift,'"t'-/A1,-",00, /,-,• .--;V.,10.4-,,/ /4,4,,.31,1.'•%7//'J.' .,/:, ‘.„ ,sz,z7/,.,',1 :-., ..-TOP OF KEY ST9NE ,„P., ,,,,,,,, • , 4., lb SEE DETA/L s„. " , ,, -'''''' I NE14 ' .0,-2. 14 -'---" s 41".--t-•r-‘5--T33 k '''NE '• Wiltirir4,2-zw--7r".S7.02,- ..= ". - Z.-- N *c"--- \MAN HOL-E irilltillidell __...! -- co ---- -\1.0: \ \ •........... ... .. .\tr. . I .,,V5 .... . 4.1...... \\\\\\‘‘ ■ p IllEi\-W'M'''-, "----,------.". ' 0:,-1 . 1 --------------- r-C7FTE".1.1Ct' ..• \ 1 V: t , q \--7 AN 689°4910E 1722 7,,. xli.pLE • ,,, • VA• / W 141mPtE 4.' EM r --------- t SHED 1/ , _ - --"--.-5 81RON ROD - / • . e.'‘.f, -...."1 .-., .....__,__- .-. , ' __. • M , . 1 S89°49'1(YE 188.63 - c:NTERLINEDIT0Fc.„ • ... _. - . I .., FL \\ \ 1?,.. : ii- \ ..... \\ '-2--. '1 s\ ''.\,■1 r*)\ •., D/W4 Zs\piALVT \ , a.-.1-... . ,..-. . ', , 1.17 '40 20"MAPLE: '54*. . _ KEYNOTF_S: - Z <6 ..A.:5 ix5=-11 , ...- : . .. --)11( , 1. 0, .•, \-...„...t-r- \ DRIVEWAY ... FENCE- 1, 0 REGRADg AND CLEAN DITCH TO EAST WHERE 0 • CC s-ii :4.4 i • rf, . N IT CONNECTS TO EXISTING SEASONAL DITCH 0 _ _ IN • 4-1- I . NEAR THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. ea el - (VmH#4 _ , N- 11k1V.,,,, • a AC &--■ ,.. i GRA .31] -NG AND DRAONAGE ? _, AN .(i , . ...„,.......4, ,-...5, , - .., , , .. ... '.''.4 ft•e 1. •\:4■Y \ , , ■rz, II .- l''4+. ' • ' '- 4sIlw";•.. s . ;'''''..14%-''I',;L'•. '• 41,PIR(S 12/37/DO -' • ....,, 02,r,..-,„' !f,., LEWIS & VAN VLEET INC. „',7,- ,,,, , ,,,,,;'.',.SA,rs• ':vv.:- 1....r., -11113114911§0LTING ENGINEERS 11,11 5 DR ) 9 9 9 - 66C; C.io • CASH'S RLTY INC. Phone: 639-4137 Fax: 684-9189 12525 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 5, 2000 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Carolyn Fox Re: SW 68th Parkway property Dear Carolyn: We have the property listed, for sale, that adjoins the "Way Lee" property that the Bank of Portland is attempting to purchase With subsequent development. The lot we have for sale has an older house on it which will be torn Down or razed at such a time that development shall occur on This lot that we have listed. Sincerely, Gerald C. Cach Cash's Rlty Inc. Cc: Bank of Salem Attn: Pete Cc: Don Pollock Per Fax Enc: Plot map 'rAY LEE' S01647'31 '1N 657.39' •• 205.00' C� property 156. 76' \ .. N . • W ay Lee pr p Carport to \ , \ A. Being sold to s.00 OUSe \ \ pfd \/o f p ortlaIld ed %° - '' \ Backo Be raZ F , in �\ _ ,i, \ '�.\ W — PARCEL \ F .°C.4.`" \ NO3°03' 46'W • LLJ " w _ ice• FEET • 48 .29' 'i cv \ \ 6' CENTERLINE 15.00' 1IDE 3E1ER Q • m EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER II, 1968 \\ \ �� 9 LU I N BOOK 720, PAGE 532 \ \ o o■ ,/-7,SEE DETAIL C Co ca FO BS in PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT 11/WASHER MARKED \ \ F \ m RECORDED JANUARY 17, 1988 'LS 1798' \ \ \ `"• 43 ;, AS FEE NO. 86002742 FALLS 1 .00' 1 \ \ 3• E, ••\ \cep 5N-221 1 1 \ Ai \ \ \ • -kis --; p 2 S01.39'56'1 169.00' . . . \ �' \ \ \ \\"..'111. SOI'39'56'W =IfI� r �... �, \ ... 219.75' \ `'• \ \..\ _ \ ... 121 . 44 / ��106.47 1. .. .. \ • , 160.08' SEE DETAIL A 39 56•E 341 . 19 I R=280'00' 1 BASIS OF BEARINGS - N01.39'56'E - SN- 8 \ .1110P L: -21•47112" 0 SEE DETAIL B -1 L=106.47' "'1 N01°39'56'E 341 . 19' 1 CH=105.93' r — T — — — ' 13'40'"' 61 S . W. 68TH PARKWAY .,----- "'I 60' WIDE + / u w a �G ail . J�IC�. , . F/W,,,,, Pty t',s �_ ^ . „ �v USA - 2 o E 33"s" �3 12525 S.W. Main Street Qr$b/ r C5 % n �; -� r Tigard, Oregon 97223 V^abler eaAci�rQSS 2o� {. ,. f-', �.._ wQr� ed ,�> City of Tigard :�1v 5� �� Tigard, Or. 97223 ATTN: spit Fox • MISDIRECTED MAIL TIGARD CITY HALL AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: WAY LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. 5210 SE 26th ST PORTLAND, OR 97202 INGRESS-EGRESS STATE OF OREGON EASEMENT ) ss. County of THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of I certify that the within , 1999 , between instrument was received for WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR record on the day of INC, an OREGON CORPORATION, , 1999 , at hereinafter called the first o'clock M. , and party, and WAY W. LEE GENERAL recorded as Document No. CONTRACTOR, INC, an OREGON Record of said CORPORATION, hereinafter County called the second party, WITNESSETH: Witness my hand and seal of County affixed. WHEREAS, the first party is the owner in fee simple of By: County Clerk-Recorder A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF THAT TRACT OF LAND, AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, WHICH HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN PLATTED AS LOT 2 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED SUBDIVISION AND ALSO BEING A PART OF SW 69th AVENUE AS PLATTED IN SAID "WAY LEE" BUT NOW VACATED AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 87-61377 , DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. AND WHEREAS the second party is the owner in fee simple of A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE" , SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1127 PAGE 44, EXCEPT THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $ 1 . 00 and other valuable considerations each to each in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: The first party does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the second party, their heirs and assigns, the right to use, at all times, AN INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT, over, across and under the following described property: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WHICH BEARS N00°38 '07"W 94 . 29 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S87°24 '35"W 89 . 52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 40 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 18 . 45 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF S74°11 '42"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 18 . 29 FEET; THENCE S60°58 '50"W 10 . 04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W A DISTANCE OF 26 . 00 FEET; THENCE N60°58 '50"E 10 . 04 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 66 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 30 . 44 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45" , A CHORD BEARING OF N74°11 '41"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 30 . 18 FEET; THENCE N87°24 ' 35"E 90 . 41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N87°24 ' 35"E 34 . 72 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 32 . 65 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°31 ' 18" , A CHORD BEARING OF S45°49 '46"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29 . 14 FEET; THENCE S00°55 '53"W 35 . 20 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 15 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 23 . 76 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°45 '39" , A CHORD BEARING OF S44°26 '55"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 21 . 35 FEET; THENCE N89°49 '46"W 54 . 30 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 38 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 20 . 49 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°54 '00" , A CHORD BEARING OF N21°10 '48"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20 . 25 FEET; THENCE N05°43 ' 49"E 17 . 29 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 7 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 12. 01 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98°19 ' 14" , A CHORD BEARING OF N43°25 '48"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 10 . 59 FEET; THENCE S87°24 '33"W 17 . 16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 6, 108 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Said use to be confined to the ingress and egress to and from the second party's property and the uses incidental thereto. In construing the foregoing agreement, the singular shall mean and include the plural wherever the context 'so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties have hereunto set their hands and seals in duplicate on this day and year first hereinabove written. FIRST PARTY SECOND PARTY WAY W. LEE, PRESIDENT OF WAY WAY W. LEE, PRESIDENT OF WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , AN OREGON CORPORATION AN OREGON CORPORATION STATE OF OREGON, )ss. County of BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this day of , 1999 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named WAY W. LEE, who being duly sworn did say he is the PRESIDENT of WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC, an OREGON CORPORATION, and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public for Oregon. 1 I EASEMENT EXHIBIT MAP 0 10 20 30 40 I SCALE: 1"= 20' I AC LP AC� C I 1 J 10"MAPLE 10"MAPLE LP I SPEED 0 LP# 12"MAPLE ED 8 * BUMP 6'0 MAPLE 0 I .. G�� CURB CB# nG °D CO Al �m JC qq - _ . . 34.72' _ --=fi-- . 90.41' _ T_ . . _ . . CURB Gv�� m �o N X66�' I Al •O �' PROPOSED INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT a.- C m a ,OQ� \ AC IN J L Z • r• \\\\ C I I 9. w \ o \ • VW o. \ .16 r� . . _ . . — • • --. . . _ . . ___ . . _ ��_ 17.16' �'A�. v� L-O ° \G R�40� I % I 6"MAPLE of w \ �c o au_ a ,0�� 8-MAPLE - N \1 CB#2 CURB I NI I 3 0 o. LP# _ 8"MAPLE 6"DE CI - _PROP08ED PROPERTY LME y. _--it -— — 14"PINE o �m 4. CB#3 , ii . x R� I CB g'MAPLE 14 90' FENCE AND GATE m s 7S I nG�63 8"ALDER CURB 54.30' 12"ALDER ;.. 3'0 DECID. /� ..� MH#2 EDGE OF AC / �•� CLUMP AC a• ,n r 24"ODECID. • CABLE I w AC CB#4 .. CLUMP DEW. FENCE �- 113 J — POST /C o MH#5 CENTER e, b I EDGE OF AC 17"PI11r FROM PTE URONTAKIS PHONE NO. : 3931377 Jul. 31 2000 09: 12AM P1 t 1 t-y4) 5o 3 .6 q--/ y7 6*(-b roi 1A. 1 1"rio ` ?Err cn3 3 3 --! 3177 '&04- or 477-1'cl‘t 50 r2 kcW - 006 kl-d - of Pa OZA- 0 S DR. I iq- cou' CI+) Pc� A . 1l'ani a►Ack 1$. 370 .010 . cZ F _" �p, 13a-�t �crf �l 91 ed nt . /06)4 4 , a& tt C (L /Ad a_ 54# OdYt/4 ki 5 deg- 40 am tat g - L-Q doll/ J ,g_K shhc(oil chat, /)).e_ S D 3a -{ nfic-5.c. rrr"-c"uLVdt' t' /uc H I, el k 4v /GI e.L 5 , r.yLili d ` I'S ae -d dz-4,"-0/ ' 74: To( 'like"- .25 a deC4....t1 4,41a Azb JS . mth is i m/vatte Sheet `. Z' /5�/ (de 6 R. (:..9),_ _ , soAtili- obo 4, Ut) 63 Ike ties e-LA 04- 4 X 107z / cL J'`°'f`,,.`.,41--,4 5,14 7 a.Lvrr o ? f xik6*-may , C� �cS.,cD 40 ima- /(TC el'i e v& Ap bLt 7TH /e/ Le e-IW - , 7 s <,- t om+_ 1 $r4 u re.4 ,41).-4--1.-,.z-k Vd'4-1 r J•.74.-. 1� 0 f� (i 67`4(d&d p) � b, otic ) ) pr -p�f n ...oE-t T-- . ,i(,E !.r ( a CST e c/t ci i iti.> a4'61- ( ,^-^ cke,--�'- 6-°°G 7/l.Fc-z-j II_u 1D 54<4,- a- f Q -�' ,rte r. .�..t Bar a 6y //i �� � I��C..7 y ,rte, • bta I sa.� / ,1o) P e c 6 V(S i _' --Tarn o, G // z 1 1 A 4 �t�Fi.,¢,.. 0.'-.Q A c - - - cw.Q&4$.,aIDr+ti-t-.-- FROM : F-TE ORONTAKIS PHONE NO. : 3931377 Jul. 31 2000 09: 12AM P2 City of Tigard July 31, 2000 Attn: Karen Fox Associate Planner RE: BANK OF PORTLAND PROJECT SDR 1999-00026 Dear Ms. Fox: 1 am faxing the letter that was sent to you on June 5, 2000,regarding the Bank of Portland property. There is also a map indicating the property with the old abandoned house. Gerald C. Cach of Cash's Realty represents Don Pollock, who is the owner of the two acres with the abandoned house. The last occupant of that house was Joe Harvey, approximately three years ago. The house has been vacant ever since. I will see you at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday. The information regarding the last tennant can be provided to you in writing. Sincerely, P. C. Vrontakis Bank of Portland FROM : PETE VRONTAKIS PHONE NO. : 3931377 Jul. 31 2000 09: 13AM P3 RLTY INC Phone: 639-4137 CASI-I S Fax: 684-9189 Tigard, Oregon 97223 12525 S.W. Main Street June 5, 2000 City of Tigard 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Carolyn Fox Re: SW 68th Parkway property Dear Carolyn: We have the property listed, for sale, that adjoins the "Way Lee" property that the Bank of Portland is attempting to purchase With subsequent development. The lot we have for sale has an older house on it which will be torn Down or razed at such a time that development shall occur on This lot that we have listed. Sincerely, �Gerald C. Cacti Cash's Rlty Inc. c: Bank of Salem Attn: Pete Cc: Don Pollock Per Fax Enc: Plot map . , 'IAY LEE' "' 205 S01.47'3I'M 857.39' M 00'. m prop+ertY 156,76' y Wad Lee Carport s-I Being SOid to 5.00' douse to , '' B pfd d %� } ,, �/ A Baulk d 0 o� z Bau Be rage °F \ I Cl; A ` m I/• 1.11 %\\ PARCEL lJ 'I '""` w - FEET \ N0 303'46w , ' 4P,29' yy sn CV \ : \ i� }— Qj CENTERLINE 15.00' VIDE SEVER \ '��\ d d 4, EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1968 ;\.� �y s►, ;. W IR 900K 220, PAGE 532 `\ co\\ .C)/,°/11,,7 SEE DETAIL C N FD BS \ m ._ I/IASHER NARKED \ \ PEPJIANENI SLOPE EASEMENT \ \ `5'Q o RECORDED JANUARY' 17, 1896 'LS 1198 ;o. AS FEE R0, 89002742 FALLS 1.00' r • \ \ �� \ •'\ \4r' s m SN-22111 \ 5. ,im ` \ \ \� z o o 2 .. SO1'3!'56'1 163.00' • • \ '' • \ \ \ \ •• 901'39' '•1.:09.112--7+ •��T. 1• ... 219.75' �'; .... .)., • \ �. • 121 W i i f�,:106. 160.09' r w SEE DETAIL A 1 w 1 R:280.00' SI N01•39'56'E 341,19' _ \ / r BASIS OF BEARINGS - NO1.39'58'E - SN 8 \ "' Lrr21'47'12' 01 SEE DETAIL B � �I Ls108,41' "'1 N011'39'56'E 341.19' -_ _____ 1 Clt2f 05.83' —'_--F-.-'.' - • - .. .� '13'4O'w �� S . W. 68TH PARKWAY. i ,/ I 80' SIDE '•L g ,1 w r a 7 N 1 4J m m g • •• r W D 9 i 3 D A f August 7, 2000 Pete Vrontakis CITY OF TIGARD Bank of Portland P.O. Box 847 OREGON Portland, Oregon 97308 Re: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: This letter is to confirm the decisions that were made in our meeting of August 2, 2000. The issues and their resolutions are as follows: 1) The buffer and screening requirements along the south property line which abuts vacant property to the southwest related to Condition #21. You have submitted a letter from the realtor dated June 5, 2000 from Gerald C. Cach of Cach's Realty Inc. who represents the owner of the two acre parcel with he abandoned house. This letter states that Cach's has the property listed for sale and that the intention is to demolish the existing dilapidated house for future development. The letter also states that Cach's is attempting to purchase this adjacent property for future development. A second letter which you have submitted dated July 31, 2000 states that the last occupant of the house was about three years ago. You proposed a ten (10') foot buffer, and retention of the existing trees along this property line which is acceptable. Please revise the plans accordingly and submit for review and for sign-off of this condition. 2) The required minimum width of the building along the SW 68th Parkway frontage related to Condition #7. The Building shall occupy a minimum of 50% of the street frontage per Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.620.030.A. The frontage is defined in TDC Chapter 18.120 as "That portion of a development site which abuts a public or private street". The applicant shall confirm the length of the frontage measured along the 68th Parkway, which differs from the width of the site further back off of 68th Parkway. The building's frontage shall be re-designed to be 50% of the property frontage. This can be accomplished either by widening the building to 50% of the width of the property's frontage, or extending the building's frontage via an attached wall with height similar to the building. Both alternatives Page 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • require that all provisions of TDC Section 18.620.40 be met including the minimum requirement for 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, and the criteria for building facade design. Revised plans and elevations shall be submitted for review. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 503-639-4171, ext. 315. Yours trul , aa„. A-1/ Karen ox Associate Planner c: Dick Bewersdorff Land-use Casefile: SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland, SDR 1999-00026 Page 2 August 7, 2000 Pete Vrontakis CITY OF TIGARD Bank of Portland P.O. Box 847 OREGON Portland, Oregon 97308 Re: Bank of Portland SDR 1999-00026 Dear Mr. Vrontakis: This letter is to confirm the decisions that were made in our meeting of August 2, 2000. The issues and their resolutions are as follows: 1) The buffer and screening requirements along the south property line which abuts vacant property to the southwest related to Condition #21. You have submitted a letter dated June 5, 2000 from the realtor, Gerald C. Cach of Cach's Realty Inc., who represents the owner of the two acre parcel with the abandoned house. This letter states that Cach's has the property listed for sale and that the intention is to demolish the existing dilapidated house for future development. The letter also states that Cach's is attempting to purchase this adjacent property for future development. A second letter which you have submitted dated July 31, 2000 states that the last occupant of the house was about three years ago. You proposed a ten (10') foot buffer, and retention of the existing trees along this property line which is acceptable provided that the property is no longer in residential use. Please revise the plans accordingly and submit for review along with any additional information you may have to confirm that the property is not in residential use, and will not be returned to residential use. 2) The required minimum width of the building along the SW 68th Parkway frontage related to Condition #7. The Building shall occupy a minimum of 50% of the street frontage per Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.620.030.A. The frontage is defined in TDC Chapter 18.120 as "That portion of a development site which abuts a public or private street". The applicant shall confirm the length of the frontage measured along the 68th Parkway, which differs from the width of the site further back off of 68th Parkway. The building's frontage shall be re-designed to be 50% of the property frontage. This can be accomplished either by widening the Page 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 building to 50% of the width of the property's frontage, or extending the building's frontage via an attached wall with height similar to the building. Both alternatives require that all provisions of TDC Section 18.620.40 be met including the minimum requirement for 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, and the criteria for building facade design. Revised plans and elevations shall be submitted for review. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 503-639-4171, ext. 315. Yours truly, aren Fox Associate Planner c: Dick Bewersdorff Land-use Casefile: SDR 1999-00026 Bank of Portland, SDR 1999-00026 Page 2 10/23/01 Activities for Case #: SDR1999-00026 11:05:16 AM Assigned Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 To Done By Disp. Level By Updated Notes SDRB225 Approval Final subj.to cond. 6/9/00 KPF DONE No Hold ST 10/22/01 This decision is final on May 24,2001 and becomes effective June 9,2000 unless an appeal is filed. SDRA000 Case Review Menu PLL DONE No Hold PLL 10/23/01 Received extension request on October 19,2001 (no payment enclosed). SDRB250 Approval extension granted 10/23/01 MT PLL DONE No Hold PLL 10/23/01 Extension was granted on 10/23/01. New expiration date is 12/9/2002. SDRA003 Pre-application meeting 1/28/99 MJR MJR DONE No Hold KPF 11/8/99 SDRA020 Case created 11/8/99 KPF KPF DONE No Hold KPF 11/8/99 SDRA090 Review for completeness 3/15/00 KPF KPF DONE No Hold KPF 3/17/00 SDRA050 Application acceptance date 3/15/00 KPF KPF DONE No Hold KPF 3/17/00 SDRA020 Case created 11/8/99 KPF KPF DONE No Hold KPF 3/17/00 SDRA019 Assign planner 11/8/99 KPF KPF DONE No Hold KPF 3/17/00 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARD October 23,2001 OREGON Bank of Salem James Eggiman,President 1995 Commercial Street, S.E. PO Box 847 Salem, OR 97308 RE: Extension of Land Use approval,Case File No. SDR1999-00026 Dear Mr. Eggiman: I have had the opportunity to review your request for an extension to your land use approval. Pursuant to the Tigard Development Code [TDC 18.360.030(D)], such extension requests shall be granted when the applicant demonstrates: 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the Director; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. Based on your letter requesting the extension,and the fact that no substantive changes have occurred in the Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions applicable to your approved development,your request for the extension is hearby granted. Your original approval was granted on June 9th, 2000 and expires on December 9th, 2001. With this extension approval,Case File No. SDR 1999-00026 will now expire on December 9th,2002, unless construction has been initiated on the site in compliance with the approved plan. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(503) 639-4171. Sincer ly, �f MORGAN TRACY Associate Planner C: SDR1999-00026 case File document2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Bank1995 COMMERCIAL ST. S.E. •P.O. BOX 847•SALEM, OR 97308 ��: S;l an (503)585-5290•FAX (503) 585-7368 ��, �7 1 1 1 RECEIVED PLANNING October 18, 2001 OCT 1 9 2001 CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager 13125 SW Hall Blvd. r Tigard OR 97223 RE: Extension of Land Use Approval (SDR) Bank of Portland SIIR 1999-00026 Dear Sir: On June 9`h, 2000 we received approval of our(SDR) subject to certain conditions. Since August of 2000 we have been unable to buy the land. Both us and the seller are willing to close the sale. There is a long term lease next door,which is the Carrows Restaurant. The lease includes an error in the legal description,which includes a small portion of our land. The owner of Carrows is trying to take advantage by asking for unreasonable compensation. The matter will be probably resolved in court. Our approval from the City of Tigard expires 12-9-01. We would like to request a one year extension. 1. We are not requesting any changes to our original plans. 2. We expect to start construction within one year. 3. There are no comprehensive plan changes since our approval. We would appreciate your help in this matter. .Once -ly, -/ / .(11 . §rThal-3 r J. es M. Eggiman President Enclosures Ftiy r �f. .. " 'M -tr'�$f h ..y Y u _., �y 2 h'q-• 1�_ f.' s {. �..e s• , h'7. 5� 1 2I` I�; [` [' P(. T d Mm� wti. K.y f'. Y .dPy t�} 3 • 1 `` ,ems f t ''-,(q3 `>•",((�y,, y.a} 1.3 t:y� '}'Si Y a.sa N IfMiYiiY31 x re JL E� ENT R IEW B+ 'S B y�f ; -r..{1 CIIY OP.TIWY ni r s 4s _ ge.,.u'r..s.. }N�z >< icy {y y t ra t r n e i *K ,nyN s t o as r a 4�r �Rx"h ' `. III �c po ! �C � f t ° 120 DAYS =711212000 SECTION 1 APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: _ BANK OF PORTLAND CASE NO. Site Development Review SDR1999-00026 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval for new construction of a 3,529 square foot two-story office building. APPLICANT: Bank of Salem OWNER: Way W. Leek General Contractor Attn: Pete Vrontakis. Board Chairman 5210 SE 26 Avenue P.O. Box 847 Portland, Oregon 97205 Portland, Oregon 97308 COMPREHENSIVE PL DESIGNATION: General-Commercial District; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G; General-Commercial. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, min-warehouse, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S 136AD, Tax Lot 6505. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR'999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 1 OF 34 SEOTION XL_____PROCEDURE AM/APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X _ The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 24, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 9, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A l: The decision of the Director (Type it Procedure) or Review Authority (Type 11 Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 8, 2000. s Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard. Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 621, 1 ;id f1/ � __ lay 24. 2000 PED Karen Perl Fo7 DATE Associate Planner N!qy 24. 2000 APPROVED BY. Richard ersdorff DATE Planning Manager :curp?n lkarenlsdrlsdr99-26dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE Ii DECISION SDR1999-00026-BANK OF PORTLAND PAGE 34 OF 34 cin1. 1995 COMMERCIAL ST. S.E. • P.O. BOX 847■SALEM, OR 97308 di, salmi (503)585-5290•FAX (503)585-7368 October 18, 2001 RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 232001 City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 RE: Extension of Land Use Approval (SDR) Bank of Portland SAR 1999-00026 Dear Sir: On June 9th, 2000 we received approval of our(SDR) subject to certain conditions. Since August of 2000 we have been unable to buy the land. Both us and the seller are willing to close the sale. There is a long term lease next door, which is the Carrows Restaurant. The lease includes an error in the legal description, which includes a small portion of our land. The owner of Carrows is trying to take advantage by asking for unreasonable compensation. The matter will be probably resolved in court. Our approval from the City of Tigard expires 12-9-01. We would like to request a one year extension. 1. We are not requesting any changes to our original plans. 2. We expect to start construction within one year. 3. There are no comprehensive plan changes since our approval. We would appreciate your help in this matter. .'nce -ly, �711Lo�� �J.mes M. Eggiman President Enclosures ' RONALD JAMES PED ARHThCT September 4, 2002 Karen Perl RECEIVED ft -, City of Tigard Planning Division SEP 11 2002 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 CITY of TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING Dear Karen, The following is a response letter to the conditions of approval letter (packet) dated 7/12/2000, File Case No. SDR1999-00026 #1-#6 These issues will be addressed by Kim McMillan of Lewis & Van Vleet 18660 s.w. boones ferry road. Tualatin, Oregon 97062. Ph (503) 885-8605 Fax (503) 885-1206. #7 The proposed building is 37'-4" wide and has three distinct offsets along SW 68th Parkway. #8 The building has been relocated and is right at the 10' setback. #9 Landscape along SW 68th Parkway has been designed to the L-1 standard. Pedestrian access has been provided from building to the sidewalk along SW 68th Parkway. Please see sheets A1 .1 and L1 .1 . #10 We will be using concrete for the sidewalk which will connect the building to the street. Please see sheets A1 .1 and L1 . 1 . 4742 Liberty Road Box 194 Salem Oregon 97302 (503)363-1456 #11 The landscape plans have been revised and updated, please see sheet L1 .1 #12 Exterior elevations have been revised. The proposed finish materials are now clearly labeled, please see sheet A3.2. #13 Exterior elevations have been revised. The proposed roof finish materials are now clearly labeled please see sheet A3.2. #14 The furnaces will be stored inside the attic. The air condensers will be stored outside of the building, and will be screened by a slotted chain link fence. Please see sheet A1 .1 for detail #3. #15 A separate application was submitted for the free standing sign by Pete Vrontakis of the Bank of Salem in the fall of 2001. #16 The landscape plans have been revised and updated, please see sheet L1.1. #17 This issue has been resolved by Pete Vrontakis of the Bank of Salem in the fall of 2001 . #18 Pedestrian connectivity has been achieved through the newly added concrete sidewalk. The landscape plans have been revised and updated, please see sheets A1.1 and L1.1 . #19 The access and egress are now clearly marked please see sheets A1 .1 and L1 .1 . #20 The egress on the north side is clearly located and labeled, please see sheet A1 .1 . #21 This issue has been resolved by Pete Vrontakis of the Bank of Salem in the fall of 2001 . #22 The landscape plans have been revised please see sheet L1 .1. • #23 The trash enclosure has been located on the site plan sheet A1.1, please see detail #1 on sheet A1.1 . So if we take 10 s.f. / 1000 s.f. of GFA , we get 10 / 3713 s.f. = 37 s.f. . Then we add 4 s.f. / 1000 s.f. (4 s.f. x 3.7) = 14.8. Therefor subtotal of enclosure is 37 s.f. + 14.8 s.f. = 52 s.f. min. #24 We are using asphaltic concrete as the paving surface for the access drive, please see sheet A1.1. #25 We are using asphaltic concrete as the paving surface for the parking lot, please see sheet A1.1. #26 Wheel stops have been added to the parking lot, please see sheet A1.1. #27 Lighting for the walkway has been provided through soffit lighting, please see sheet A6.1. Lighting lights in the parking lot have also been provided for your review, please see sheet A1.1. #28 Bicycle parking has been added, please see detail #2 on sheet All. for location of the (1) bike rack that can accommodate (2) bicycles. #29 This issue has been resolved by Pete Vrontakis of the Bank of Salem in the fall of 2001. #30 The accessible parking has been located and dimensioned on sheet A1.1. #31-#36 These issues will be addressed by Kim McMillan of Lewis & Van Vleet 18660 s.w. boones ferry road. Tualatin, Oregon 97062. Ph (503) 885-8605 Fax (503) 885-1206. #37 All interior drives and access aisles are now clearly marked, along with the direction of the traffic flow, please sheet A1.1. #38 The sign for the ADA space has been provided and labeled on sheet A1 .1 Sincerely, Ronald James Ped Architect, PC. President September 16, 2002 u,,,,,,r, ,\ Ronald James Ped, Architect CITY OF TIGARD 4742 Liberty Road OREGON Box 194 Salem, OR 97302 RE: Bank of Portland Submittal SDR1999-00026 Dear Mr. Ped: I am writing in response to the submittal you made on September 11, 2002 for the Bank of Portland project in Tigard. For your information, I am responding to the individual conditions that you have specifically addressed. ♦ Condition #7 requires that the building occupy 50% of the frontage or 39 feet. The plans that were submitted only indicate a 37'-4" width, but the frontage requirements would dictate a 39' wide building. ♦ Condition # 8-This condition is satisfied, however it needs to be reflected on all of the construction documents. ♦ Condition #9 speaks to enhancing the public pedestrian access to the business and increasing the landscaping or providing an arcade. The plan indicates the addition of a sidewalk to the front of the building, however, the sidewalk leads into a staff lounge that will more than likely be accessed only by the staff. This is not the intent of the code. The intent is to provide a pedestrian friendly environment that allows for entrances off of the street. This condition is not satisfied. ♦ Condition #10-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #11-This condition is satisfied. • Condition #12-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #13-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #14-This condition is satisfied. • Condition #15-N/A with this submittal. ♦ Condition #16-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #17-N/A with this submittal. • Condition #18-Addressed previously in condition #9 discussion. ♦ Condition #19-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #20-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #21-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #22-requires a tree to be located in the landscape island. The plans do not indicate a tree within the landscape island, and the island is going to be used for the condensers and signage, leading me to believe that there will be no room for a tree. The reason for this requirement is to ensure that a natural canopy is provided over the parking lot. This condition is not satisfied. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 ♦ Condition #23-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #24-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #25-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #26-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #27-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #28-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #29-N/A with this submittal. ♦ Condition #30-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #37-This condition is satisfied. ♦ Condition #38-This condition is satisfied. You have indicated that the remaining conditions are will be satisfied by Lewis &Van Vleet. I am available to discuss the deficiencies by telephone or in person as long as an appointment is scheduled. If you have any questions, contact me at (503)639-4171 ext. 2434 or stop by our offices located at 12135 SW Hall Blvd. Monday-Friday between the hours of 8AM and 4PM. Sincerely, Brad Kilby, AICP Associate Planner Ap Washington County,Oregon 2002-136746 �� . 1111412002 03:61:31 PM D-! Cnt■l 8trr7 K GRUNEWALD ECORDING APTER R 525.00$6.00 611.00 -Tota1�2.00 RETURN TO1 Iiiiiiihno WAY LEE GENERAL CoNTRAPTGR INC. 5210 SE 26th ST 00202782200201367480050058 PORTLAND, OR 97 202 I,Jerry Hanson,Director ofA ment and Taxation y. and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, itr �;:y� do hereby certify that the within Instrument of writing _,. ',.: we,received and recorded In the bo k of records of _ INGRESS-EGRESS STAT °'d county. ,e.or, ;.-t,.. ' EASEMENT Jerry R.Hanson,Director went and Tuition, dt Ex-Officio County Clerk • County LL - U THIS AGREEMENT, Made and A entered into this_' / ( L._ day of I certify that the within 0 ✓ ,.2()D7-., between JHCB instrument was received for 'PROPtRTIES LLC record on the _ day of 1 hereinafter called the first 1999, at 0 party, and BANK OF SALEM, AN OREGON o'clock M. , and . 2 CORPORATION . , hereinafter recorded as Document No. O called the second party, Record of WITNESSETH: said County WHEREAS , the first party is the Witness afynd and seal of itne owner in fee simple of Y iha A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART By: OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY County Clerk-Recorder RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, SAID TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352, AS RECORDED IN WAsHiNGTON COUNTY DEED RECCRD0 . AND WHEREAS the second party is the owner in fee simple of A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE" , AG DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1127 PAGE 44, AS RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $ 1. 0.0 . ____ and other valuable considerations each to each in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged: The first party does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the1 right to at all times, AN second party, their heirs and assigns, the right to use, at al» t , INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT, over, across and under the following described property: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 WHICH BEARS N00°38 '07"W 94. 29 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE EAID S87°24 '35"W 89 . 52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CURVE HAVING A RADIUS Or 40. 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 18 . 45 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45", A CHORD BEARING OF S74°11'42"W, AND A CHORD LENGTH O 18. 29 FEET; THENCE 560°58 '50"W 1.0 . 04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W A DISTANCE OF 26 . 00 FEET; THENCE N60°58 '50"E 10•.04 FEET; THENCE ALONG ATH LENGTH OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 66 .00 FEET, LENGTH OF 30 . 44 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°25 '45", A CHORD BEARING OF N74°11 '41"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 30. 18 FEET; THENCE N87°24'35"E 90. 41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N07 °24 '35"E 34.72 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 . 00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 32 . 65 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93°31 '18" , A CHORD BEARING OF 545°49'46"E, ANO A CHORD LENGTH OF 29. 14 FEET; THENCE S00°55 '53"W 35. 20 FEET, THENCE rifl€rs Cono I- ,i4 3 19 4 MEI 111111 2002-136746 ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A y_ ' RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 23.76 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 45'39" ,A CHORD BEARING OF S 44 DEGREES 26' 55" E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 21.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID DOCUMENT NUMBER 98077352; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 49' 46" W,ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 54.30 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 20.49 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30 DEGREES 54' 00", A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 21 DEGREES 10' 48"E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20.25 FEET; THENCE N 05 DEGREES 43' 49"E 17.29 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 7.00 FEET, ARC LENGTH OF 12.01 FEET, CENTRAL ANGLE OF 98 DEGREES 19' 14", A CHORD BEARING OF N 43 DEGREES 25' 48"W,AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 10.59 FEET; THENCE S 87 DEGREES 24' 33"W 17.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 6,108 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Of the said property of the first party, said use to be confined to the ingress and egress to and from the second party's property and the uses incidental thereto. In construing the foregoing agreement, the singular shall mean and include the plural wherever the context so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said parties have hereunto set their hands and seals in duplicate on this day and year first hereinabove written. JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC THEODORE E. BAXTER,MEMBER CHAO C I. •• WU By Baxter as attorney i act ;‘441-&-c• c, ��r iii_ �=•.a.t-r� ngiODY H.C. BAXTER, MEMBER 'I ' / i' 'a $$ovaXX,1 / BANK OF PORTLAND by Jeffrey P. Tainer, Vice President STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Multnomah ) 0 ctobe e BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this // day of September, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Theordore E.Baxter, who being duly sworn did say that he is a member of JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last written above. OFFICIAL SEAL THERESA L.MARSHALL - - - - -- unT•nv.+ m n nnrnnu 1111111111111111 I 1111111 2002-136746 P BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this 1 3 day of November, 2002, before me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Jeffrey P. Tainer who being duly sworn did say that he is the VICE PRESIDENT of BANK OF SALEM, an Oregon corporation, and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last written above. 0111.A./.40.--(4140.,g-44_614. OFFICIAL SEAL THERESA L.MARSHALL Notary Public for Oregon Nil-1,w NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.360256 MY COMMISW1N LYDIPES SEAT is" cOuo t STATE OF OREGON ) P ss. County of Multnomah ) BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this (I day of"- • ,•r, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State,personally appeared the within named JUDY H.C. BAXTER, who being duly sworn did say that she is a member of JHCB PROPERTIES, LLC and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. t iii .ddI/ /. / = Notary Public for Oregon OFFICIAL SEAL � •;:- THERESA L.MARSHALL `"',"'' COMMISSION N.6N 0256 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 13,2006 j Lr%V`1vIGil! I G^Cllal i lvlr1r 0 10 20 30 40 SCALE. 1"- 20' [ J . AC J sPEID F 1 r MAPLE 1 d'MAPLE iILA Q• 9Q41' _ .- 34.72 _ • - , . . CURB 'd�0 _ ' -/ - ----66. 1 1 1 Po' §ti • 8 I PROPOSED INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT a o r m. OLT, -.6/ _ o \ - I -_ - 17.16' Er � V� 59.52 I t +' .'o v� Afl„ �. i CMAPLE c. �4ak k ErMAPLE e 1i / -)16, a 03,2 _ CURB t cOOV'I ap Pi0P08® PROE'HlT1( L.P 6'O ECI._ . -B cc ' X: 1 kl--------I 14-PINE o�ja e V n. `�_ CBj3 - �� 8,.?... I �A-' 6 MAPLE 14.90' �,:—._ CE O GA l X _1..0,1 nG is --� 54,301 ,� CURB '- --- --' 12"ALDER ': 3'ODECID. -. • '/ ti1HI2 EDGE OF AC 1 a'. CLUMP J I» a I n r 24—O �E C{D. CLUMP CABLE - C8j4 * • D%W FENCE r a y POST MHH#5 - CENT 1b ■ i EDGE OF • -r.,... 2002-136746 Ci, CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTRS;)LAND SURVEYOR • 8120 S.W.Lombard A'enrte Telephone 503/614 3178 Oregon-Washington•Idaho 8aaverton,Oregon O70r19-4738 FAX 503/&l4-3190 , i 4 AUGUST 11, 1999 JOB No. 6016-2 PETER VRONTAKIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT AFTER PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT A TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF TRACT "B" AND PART OF LOTS 1-3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AND A PART OF THE VACATED PORTION OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE, IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, THE BOUNDARY OF WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A 2 INCH IRON PIPE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE1' ; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 3 , THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES, N89°49 '46"W 188 .59 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, ►s0O 29 '59"E 5 . 00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, NB9°45 '56"W 101.57 FEET TO A 5/H INCH IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N89°45 '56"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "B" , 66 . 71 TO A 5/8. INCH IRON ROD ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF LOT :l "WAY LEE"; THE+'NC'E S00°14 ' 04"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 5.00 FEET; THENCE N89°45 '56"W 4. 00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE, THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT 23 . 10 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "COOPER CONSULTANTS'" , SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 280. 00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF, 04°43 '35" , A LONG CHORD THAT HEARS N26°39 '23"W 23 . 09 FEET; THENCE N29°O1. '10"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 56 . 62 FEET; THENCE 589°45'56"E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "B" , 107. 84 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896", SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST EAST LINE OF LINE OF LOT 2 11WAY 1+EEIIb B THENCE PLASTIC 2, 13 , 66 FEET TO A / CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING NO0°38 '07"E 51.34 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3 ; THENCE S89°48 '30"E 290 . 74 FEET TO A 5/$ INCH IRON ROD, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S00°03 ' 44"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE 0 SQUARE F LOT FE3, 56 . 34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 21, OR 0 . 499 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. i BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SU©DWIS!ONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKF•OUT Patty Lunsford - FYI - Page 1 From: Jeanne Temple To: Patty Lunsford Date: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:09:54 PM Subject: FYI - FYI - SDR1999-00026 I changed the name of the project to Bank of Tigard, per applicant. The reason I change the SDR is so all other permits that are grouped to it will reflect the correct project name. Originally, Bank of Portland. Now Bank of Tigard DBA Bank of Salem. The property signage will be Bank of Tigard. Thanks Jeanne Temple 503-639-4171 Ext. 2433 Jeanne @CI.TIGARD.OR.US RETURN RECORDED DOCUMI 0: Wathlr '.ounty,Oregon 2002-1 51872 Y� 12113 9:35:53 AM CITY HALL RECORDS DEPAR1,.__ 'lT, 13-0D Cnt■1 Btn■21 RECORD81 CITY OF TIGARD $15.00$6.00$11.00•Total■$32.00 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 111111111 11 1111111111111 1111 00220513200201518720030035 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A mint and Taxation ^-,q ,. and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, y: Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of: fr •. writing was received and recorded In the book of CORPORATION records of said county. ,,II :4 Jerry R.Hanson,Director mint and Taxation, �.' Yom" Ex-Officio County Clerk File No. 513E- DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Space above reserved for Washington County Recording information Bank of Salem does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street,road,and utility purposes on,over, across,under,along, and within the following described real properties in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this 5t e ay of NovE nber ,2002 Bank of Salem iy11,2„) . 6Walev,) Name of Corporation Si. . re 1995 Ccxrmercial Street SE President dent Address Title Salem, OR 97302 C)Ij/iA'vjA--"d iSgnature � Executive Vice President Tax Statement Mailing Address(if different from above) Title STATE OF OREGON ) Marion )ss. County of WasKirlito ) • This instrument was acknowledged before me on November 5, 2002 (date)by James M. Eggiman and Jon R. Johnson (name(s)of person(s))as President and . - .t - __ '• :a (type of autht.►rity,e,s.,officer,Malec,etc.) of Bank of Salem (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). �.t,1►. OFFICIAL SEAL L�P Y� _ ��n JUL!t.. A MILLER NOTAi-iY - .IRLIC - OREGON ( r s Signature COMM:S'SiON NO. 347664 My Commission Expires: 7/11/05 MY COM It?MIRES ES JUL 11,2005 y p Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this Z day of D' 64 v ,200 Z . City Engineer A:DEDICATION FOR RIGHT.doc 111 11101111 1111 2002-151872 CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 AUGUST 24, 1999 JOB No. 6016-6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5.00 FOOT STREET DEDICATION A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF LOT 1 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AND A PART OF THE VACATED PORTION OF S .W. 69TH AVENUE, AND A PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172 , WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 36 , TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, THE BOUNDARY OF WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "B" "WAY LEE" ; THENCE S00°14 '04"E 1 . 74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 ; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 3 . 58 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO WAY LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC. IN BOOK 1012 PAGE 172, SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 285 . 00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°43 ' 14" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S24°11 '44"E 3 .58 FEET; THENCE N89°46 '01"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 5 . 49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S.W. 69th AVENUE AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 85043572; THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT 23 . 10 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "COOPER CONSULTANTS" , SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 280 . 00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°43 ' 35" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N26°39 '23"W 23 . 09 FEET; THENCE N29°01 ' 10"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 56 . 62 FEET; THENCE S89°45 ' 56"E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "B" , 5 . 73 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" ; THENCE S29°01 ' 10"E, PARALLEL TO SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE, 53 . 82 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" ; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 25 . 78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 285 . 00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°11 '03" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S26°25 '38"E 25 . 78 FEET, CONTAINING 398 SQUARE FEET. BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT EXHIBIT MAP 2002-151872 PETER VRONTAKIS IN LOTS 1 -3 AND TRACT B "WAY LEE" LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, SEC. 36, R.1 S, 1W, W.M. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SCALE: 1"=30' JUNE 24, 1999 m E 0 10 20 30 40 0 CASWELL/ REGISTERED / HERTEL PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS INC. LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W. LOMBARD AVE. BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 7(.447*Z5-0 (503) 644-3179 L OREGON JULY 10. 1900 \ ALBERT HERTEL 1896 EXPIRES 6/30/01 . . N C �t . \ . \ y \ S89'45'56"E 5.73' � ` \ `' s • -50. Za moo. `',c). 4- 0. 0 S+, °.. 0;90 /3 T � Os S (O Osc �. A 30 CO \ tS 0(0 �`•,' 6`.2'S r o 6,a '0 �� y`7, i F BK 1012 PG 172 CZ �0 �� R=285.00' co �L= 042 7 J'y • �=04'27'49" C=S26'47'16"E 9 L� R=280.00'�'� 'JP \ate 22.20' a �� y A=04'43'35" �' �o TRACT B A C=S26'39'23"E o �� ��S00'14'04"E 1.74' O \ 23.09' 1 R=285.00' 'y 1 L=3.58' y N89'46'01"E 5.49' A=00'43'14" C=S24'1 1'44"E 3.58' JOB NO. 6016-6 11/07/02 09:40 e503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 0 001 Phone:503-626-6177 Fax 503-67.6-6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL COMPANY Fax To Ronald James Ped Architect PC From: Rose Bowles Andy Krzeminski Pax: 503-375-8274 Date: November 7,2002 Phone: 503363-1456 l Res Site Plan for 6505 SW 6981 Ave CC: 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply Cl Please Recycle •Comments: The updated plan you submitted,a1.1 dwg is acceptable- do you, Atoseft 1 R� CM Craig Schmidt l r `FE1s C0.001-r101 • 3 3 JAMES 1111111 RMAMPED _ . Fax cover sheet To: S red11 I Fax Number 57) 3, f0 . 7-2,477 From: Ronald James Ped Architect, PC Fax:503.375,8274 - Phone 503.363.1456 p 1j oF- I G4(40, L 'Akelt, o kc>C1 eT1 . p —1W 5 7sit A- T(P-45- rNs v 11+e- PM—SC42/ft/ P6 LI 61 62"--) 1-- . no v.c.i.cuoe NO.023 P.2/4 °. 1 . ALT Owner's Policy (10/17/92) SCHEDULE A Dalt of Policy: July 16, 2002 At 6:00 p.m. Policy No.: 263788w Orde; No,: 263798w Ama' nt of Insurance: $106,000.00 Pren ium: $467.50 1 , N mo of Insured: B. k of Salem, an Oregon corporation • 2. T `e estate or interest In the lend which ie covered by this policy is: A ' EE 3, Title to the estate or interest In the kind is vested in: Ba k of Salem, an Oregon corporation Y , 4. T land referred to In this policy is situated in the State of Oregon, County of W:shingtor and is described as follows: As fully set forth on exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, . ��.,� r✓cri i N0.023 P.4/4 .1 3 r.- p 4a 00 • LAC ;a30 • 5100-MI �-.,.o--� • 8 1 s >. ! I C.s Ma. 12 013 1 �q • 0 _ f_ .t" w Igo I 0. w � r 4300 = X4301 0 r'. r 0 II gO 01'1i'. r 4 g0 /1 :fig P� ;XV, 2 yes 2 p►� ",f. • ...4.............. 1 gr�- �� -'� 1 ° r mto • 010 I k 6300 I 590 4 I I 0.4.0 At. Is I =rte y„� Ii' w ti I$ 4111P 404• All sK, t113' 6907 . —pr P.79 r4C, to — s 54 6503 • 1 $ /.39Ac 3 P Op. ' S5 II a a 3 g • , t f • ' 1 � nTRr.w $ 6 II�ITW.X 41 $ ' , ,x I N „„."4_,.„,--"-- PQIRT 1 •.., a i.■ i«. t.1 fl441'11"D 4M.3o W- ;T S24/ I aft - _ 1 ( SEE MAP Is I 365A Th1118 MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF AssIsTINO IN LOCATING SAID PREM SE6.ANO TIT Pf c4 MPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS,IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS,MID LOCATIONS ,�#� ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. rt'`ri�°,'— N0.022 P.3/4 q r t Order No. 263792..., EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description A tract of land being all of Tracts "A" and "a" and part of Lots 1, 2 and 3 , WAY LEE, a duly recorded plat in Washington County Plat ecords, and a part of the vacated portion of SW 59t:2 Avenue, all of Parcel 2 as described in Document No. 80-27388, Washington County meed Records, and a portion of the land conveyed to Way W. Lee, arieral Contractor, Inc. in Book 1012, page 172 , Washington County '.wed Records, located in the Southeast one-quarter o:: the Northeast quarter Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the illamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and -tat® of Oregon, the boundary of which is more particularly described =s follows; ..EGINNING at a 2 inch iron pipe At the Southeast corner of Lot 3 , WAY EE; thence North 89° 49' 46" West, along the South line of said Lot , 188 . 59 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the Southeast corner of said •arcel. 2 of Document No. 80-27388; thence North 89° ' 6' 01" - long the South line of said Parcel 2 and said Book 1012, Pageg172 a -i,stance of 172 .25 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line �-f SW 69th Avenue as deeded to the City of Tigard, recorded as "octuq,ent No. 850435727 thence along said right of way line, along the ,-rc of a curve to the left 23 . 10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a callow plastic cap inscribed "Cooper Consultants", said curve having radius of 280 . 00 feet, a central angle of 04° 43' 25" , a long chord hat bears North, 26' 39' 23" West 23 .09 feet; thence North 29° 01' 0" West, continuing along said right of way line, 56 . 62 feet; thence outh 89° 45' 56" East, parallel to the South line of said Tract "s" , 07 . 84 feet to a 5/8 inch by 30 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic ap inscribed "Hertel Pls 1896", said point being on the East line of said Lot 2; thence South 00° 38 ' 07" East, along said East line of t,ot 2 a distance of 13 . 66 feet to a 5/8 inch by 30 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed ',Hertel Pis 1896" , said point being orth 00 ° 38' 07" East 51. 34 feet from the Southwest corner of said of 3; thence South 89° 49' 46" East 290.74 feet to a 5/8 inch iron od, said point being an the East line of said Lot 3; thence South 0° 03' 44" west, along said East line of Lot 3 a distance of 56.34 set to the point of beginning. r r 4 IN'.TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hank, and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. .c.11 e.c� „ „„"���F CUII SEAL -��-�-.� o ry Public for Oregon. f1 �_ LULU C.LEE / r i(��� NDTARYPUBLIC-0REGON r) STATE OF OREGON, I `�''�/MY COMMISSION WINES FEB 06089 2001 +� " ,� )ss. �- ����`�2�- `1�-��ti County of_� ( fl 1 ) da of p4e-Ar./....S.74- 7______, 1999 before BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this_ Y and State, me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and r �.d County personally appeared the within named CHAO CHENG WU, who being duly sworn did say that he is the indentical person named in the forgoing instrument, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. o ry Public f r Oregon. . ^". 1.^1 ��OFFICIAL SEAL ) (l �4. LULU C.IEEGON l 4� ►VOTARY PU N N'QR59 STATE OF OREGON, ) �� ' � COMMIS 1 1 ss. , ,it to FEB i7. 1 County of_��G ���. ) -, `• 1999 before BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this :w4.(0'.5---- day of 11-ted,ait 'me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and d County and State, personally appeared the within named WAY W. LEE, who being duly sworn did say that he is the PRESIDENT, of WAY W. LEE GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. , an OREGON CORPORATION, and that this instrument was signed on behalf of its board of directors, and does hereby acknowledge that this instrument was executed freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. ot. Public for Oregon. r�`��.��1ti1=1 ��� > OFFICIAL SEAL )r =-r wICC.LEE 0 1f ��rn= - NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON �'•: - COMMISSION NO.060858 , ,�, f �1-`.�COMMISSION f�RES FF.. 1 T.2001 y(f eiCASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644.3179 Oregon Weshkngton-Idaho • Beaverton,Oregon 87008-4736 FAX 503/644-3190 AUGUST 11, 1999 JOB No. 6016-2 PETER VRONTAKIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT AFTER PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT A TRACT OF LAND BEING ALL OF TRACT "B" AND PART OF LOTS 1-3 "WAY LEE" , A DULY RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, AND A PART OF THE VACATED PORTION OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE, IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, THE BOUNDARY OF WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A 2 INCH IRON PIPE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 "WAY LEE"; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 3 , THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES, N89°49 '46"W 188. 59 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, NOO°29 '59"E 5. 00 FEET TO A 5/6 INCH IRON ROD, N89°45 ' 56"W 101 . 57 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE N89°45 '56"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT "B" , 66. 71 TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 "WAY LEE" ; THENCE S00°14'04"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 5 .00 FEET; THENCE N89°45 '56"W 4.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF S.W. 69TH AVENUE; THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT 23. 10 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "COOPER CONSULTANTS", SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 280 .00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°43 '35" , A LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N26°39 '23"W 23.09 FEET; THENCE N29°01 '10"W, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE, 56. 62 FEET; THENCE S89°45 '56"E, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "B" , 107.84 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 2 "WAY LEE"; THENCE S00°38'07"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 2, 13 . 66 FEET TO A 5/8 BY 30 INCH IRON ROD WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "HERTEL PLS 1896" , SAID POINT BEING NOO°38 '07"E 51 . 34 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3 ; THENCE S89°48 '30"E 290. 74 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE S0O°03 '44"W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 3 , 56 . 34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 21, 750 SQUARE FEET OR 0.499 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING • CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT i 1 EASEMENT EXHIBIT MAP . 0 10 20 30 40 SCALE: 1n= 20' AC AC J LP "P- AC J SPEED 1 �LE 1MAPLE LP (ill C a _ AC . . . • —. , 9x.41' . . \CURB ' — . . -- _.3,412S' ? 1 m z 660. 1 J / PROPOSED INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT a v AC j m d N. -k \ AC 1 J n \J i !C i �w D/W °o, \ 1 - 17.16 �1 t,''N-\ \ ¢0 89.52' (7 L_o, I o �V 1 l i g0.0 p�, ; , W I i 6"MAPLE I r N: o . . p \ I - AC P�` . s"MAPLE E3 \ I J n 1 0 ... r-: 1- 8 iii ErMAPLE� t DECD \ PROPOSED PROPERTY l!E • --•1 mss--- \\ \ / 14'PINE ` °IIv� I \• •� CB '3 CB � . 'I m 0..•?„, I CB g'MAPLE " Q;•/ FENCE AND GATE m . 150,1 14.90 is—.—�L:�L_ X•ww•X ._.■ � _ (;,, . •• BALDER w= % 54.30' 1 . CURB 12-ALDER EDGE OF AC � S 3'0DECID. r MH�2 ' ._ ' CLUMP AC ►? CC �) r 24"ibEC1D. 1 C CLUMP FENCE 1 - POST qC MN,5 CENTS; WV 118 V 0 Z I_EDGE OF A CASH'S RLTY INC• Phone: 6394137 11 1�� Fax: 6849189 12525 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 5, 2000 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or. 97223 Attn: Carolyn Fox Re: SW 68te Parkway property Dear Carolyn: We have the property listed, for sale, that adjoins the "Way Lee" property that the Bank of Portland is attempting to purchase With subsequent development. The lot we have for sale has an older house on it which will be torn Down or razed at such a time that development shall occur on This lot that we have listed. Sincerely, Gerald C. Cach Cash's Rity Inc. c: Bank of Salem Attn: Pete Cc: Don Pollock Per Fax Enc: Plot map ( ) , . ... ..11. -, ;Lilo . Argit.1 1 , .. ...,,, ,,.„...ime, • ......14-iii, v. , ., , „.„. • '1"4 . PI 1.. 4 ' . . . 0- 1 i li • ••‘,1■• AC AV .4'1 .....1.• S, •. .pi ,■ ' , 14, . . • e.'r \I ' 41L -1' ''' 1 '. ‘•• V.:4 c?'. r )Ir`'•- • v. *rth . /. i 1 - - '''"•,„; • r• - i..i,•:.$••. ' —,-..''diskt:Aip lit.'--. .4'' c* r t.�, •- ,1 •1 •�.}j�• '' 1 yt r,� I,. S`t'i r�,� :.e 4 ms, ► ..;.►v..4..•�•�3' :?%.1.,..,,,1!4 •,.. �;.��!'� �I".t� 5.7 �,t r Y •• •` [, \ 1. e�1 •. •. / -- 4,a . ,g�4.• .F 1"� a '1�� I[ter'' \,.. y 3. ry 'i�"�.s ia♦' ,�a '•• IL ir•� • - 't,•,t . - I ,.,• ., r 3''t- . '41144,n ?• :• . .�•L�Iiln r .• y,'. ' / ••. .I w\7 .1. /�pj�ir`•'ALF +_ ,�'.�7L • ~ 1 t�. •� •� •r •:7�!1 ',!a•1 • te'4'40. „�:..7• 1 \!l.• -` x,-51 - .� ,, ir+`♦ •`,1 t .�y , y- ii -C �>• 31 `R1! '• . .. ...1jf i«-.. .1"• ••• 4''," . \'''-.1 (il .,. • . y• it• . ..........-. • ..; ... -44k .r.k .. I ' ' '�. • 1 • , t `y )� ''� • ` P Ir,I Y. nr.. .. �: Y 5t .E a7.z l fi l h'1 '[ �~r •, ., :": IM - `.a`.�• t p ..,—%-• ` < ' n c s ': •/.CMS I ... I I. • a• °i11' S :. ��« 4'y h.,n;, t 1 ;. .. ��: ( lr. ' _ +• • '' �.ty•• r j "t'j t —r �� cs. —.._f..-.:4 ,t. Y X71 ::b. •i 1 g." r� • •rr?�, f lira' .s'3 A •Ti l�M�"r r: ,`' '..e� , • ;'7 eta! ` r r-.' #.•t I 4... I reY� P �r ^��, �' ......"7. '' 1�►•� L � .k'i •�< 3 - ' t- q`'I,r�1'.mac'• x. '' ' . •�, t - rt ' it .. � 4'.°-'g—%.• tea-. 4.—..-. •.. . ri - - y •_it yt tt♦ `, {rb - �}. , - .. '- - . ' • .4• .:L..• •wY> .?l l • ,fit: 11_t t. ; '- t`:� ' rte'u' • • • 1 ,'-\. 1:x'1.•+ i y' •' .f.. { y `>F • '�y `�� y � � ' n.iAp .�n.f`- ''ik.,-f'�17'••�'' '-i`fi'+•1� =�•v Y'� ZS ) '% t y t ,..i IJ` ��:[5' ..y; .y. ,�!< `-"�'�e..�lo-���;'. T' li�•.��i� ,�}`'e. .Z ► f'Y 5 'Y.y•1-•ir► --_ .• 1. S _ ����("��j� � �':?IC..•. ..1h0-;',Val''''1.1(��� a�• ".'y?r�: •I�S� .:�' r 1r`: !�'�} . ar-.' •5.' :..1 .r� .,'? 'L /i. L f ."KL•,<�'>J•' Yi•:;..„�i j�y� .Y ,i y1•'6',Y�• y ,1 /� •,.: y ''''.4.1 5<..'4., f, ,'.. •i;;•.'rii)*' Strr...5 '' ....' i;%••••rt%. M1 '•••' 1 �94;'C S.i(E�. �jt.-•1�•�r a � ,' r fa T• �s�1.l•(�;�•••rz�.r;�•'-�:s�i.... -s}•.r''= '.�.•tM '� ,: ''� �F.��",'',. '`J{'`<� r d. t 11•- 1 -' 1. ' , . j„;t r r_,i: i�` .,',•'li •s t K X14 .• . +•; . • -w• .z. - r• • tit ;. Yn fi;t la' • '3 a.i�t,,X✓f :f-t :'h; •_:,.....'F +w, y... �. ° ..,4'.• :' r, �. •� : 1 �♦ • .�' -..1,.:1,,:iT t:.- .441,•�`J IL':Y� : '.�`'•�� � V -.4.'h� ti� t ry+t} r,,,!--le. �.. � Q s'�i.*� �. �' h. •11y:, ' _'j A -if1 _ ,•, F. - , . . .,,,• .' �{,. ',/..41W'x� :1,1'i 4.�' Y• .3 qk ." s>'y� �a'. Yc 4- q .y,• 1 S ml. ,l 0.4 , �,!';41 t• H Ak5 a .0 '.s.,< j . 0fi,.,,- . ..----- g„',1+s�...1 .. y~ P; �Y> 4'..�l. � '3' > .:k - Item #29 Please see Tree Removal Plan. Also see Surveyors Letter with the inventory of all 12" or larger trees. The arborist letter indicates the 11 trees to be removed. Pour of the 11 trees to be removed are less than 12" in diameter. He also placed red tape on the trees to be removed. All the remaining trees in the development will be protected by a four (4') foot high orange construction fencing. Also the rear 70' area which is not part of the development will be fenced with a four (4') foot high orange fence to protect the trees in this area. See attached: 1 . Tree Removal Plan 2. Surveyor's Tree Inventory Letter 3. Arborist Letter (Peacock Tree Preservation) --I IwC.., ri"°----11 Q 0...LaZ rtCg .°WM �- {. N ... V ...w—00,0.0.2N..r.1■. .4&3 SNDI SA(p a1.w /:. Z I S' T22 wig s.....WS • .-:sass ns,x2222.. ....el. ...:a. 0000 s.M 2 000-...i ....1 ,. . .v s '1\ 01 FM 11,iTn''L 1...i 11=i- �G •MOM 'FJ!III=.F- O �.sa.s..r,l.. IRRIGATION SYMBOLS 1 \ 016...1 2.21.0 L ,0 000.J 3....G MP 111 R.. Ili • ga TREE PLAN IING — VERTICAL SIAKES 6 nc.a li6ri•�r. �+' EASE FROM .. 'U Unli i° \' 1 , 2•22.Us212 r ! N ,M_�w ... .� SY I I I.w 1.':�;,3.......„--4„,... • 1 AZ., „- 1 .1•11.sea...n w. .eu.c AIWA re> M TREE REMOVAL PLAN • '1[> kCP x \ X. X x x. x FE:T. X EASEl.1: ,. FROM . x x y. yft ii} /I Z 71_ 6 % L 9 ..w la I u. ti O 1 L.I. I a `wr/av R`�_ a.,-.4.i pppyWWppp ryF nT■glll�./r�-7r4✓w..J.+'.:IL++ `. 1<r��:.^M.x.11191► MVOs as...... \ �J9,2 11,"1 0m 0 OD �F r. .,LANDSCAPE PLAN .u.,..... L1.1 1 CASWELL/HERTEL SURVEYORS, INC, REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 6120 S.W.Lombard Avenue Telephone 503/644-3179 Oregon-Washington-Idaho Beaverton,Oregon 97008-036 FAX 503/6443190 July 26, 1999 Job 6016-1 Mr. Pete Vrontakis 1420 Rafael St. N Salem, OR 97303 A Dear Pete: We visited TL 6505 on SW 69 Ave, just south of Carrows Restaurant on July 22, 1999_ During our visit we inventoried the trees on the site, as it will be, after the double Property Line Adjustment, that is presently in progress_. We found that there are 40 trees with a diameter of 12" in diameter or larger. During our visit we also noted that there were approximately 30-40 trees that were under 12" in diameter. If we can be of any further assistance please feel free to call on us_ Respectfully, d 77-€cY Albert Hertel Corp_ Sec_ K BOUNDARY SURVEYS • SUBDIVISIONS • TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING - CONSTRUCTION STAKE-OUT • < � • TREE PRESERVATION P.O.Box 19783•Pordaad, Oregon 97280 _�, �• Telephone(503)248--0843 • • Specialists in tree care • : ..._..-_ Op• Pet cis - • - rigs;. • , • :I_,,.: s-- vac . ,.SW -:Av in w e-the .Frye F.. gt w 1.1."be~ :. The t =plan inclicatm,, -eJeyerc meed - �x ved � k g 1t be.-:bu tt F fm the trees Vie--be iemovec "ate.-,Ies-s-t :rtwet e:di es :u * .-- 'he - =-cff.. °Cain: e:are-° -trees_- a ce-tvvleve - -t: .p1.acet;:re2t 1zpe on the es reinOnUe4"As-pot-. .: eided to3zne. Eeed..luck with • --peed call -F. ; be of -ice: • \; ;.(11 Stephen earpck exist • • "Optimizing Tree Health Through Modern Arboriculture" •