Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2000-00002
SDR2000 -00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 CITY OFTIGARD EMPIRE BATTERIES Community(Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/4/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00002 Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and, therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Empire Batteries, Inc. Engineered Structures 7320 SW Bonita Road 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light-Industrial; I-L. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420 REVIEW 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790 CRITERIA: 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002—EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 1 OF 26 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the fol owing conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia-Hajduk. 1. Submit to the Police Department, an outdoor lighting plan for review and approval. 2. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows no above ground utilities or vegetation exceeding 3 feet in height will be located in the vision clearance areas. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing adjacent to the required buffer from Ball Creek. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows at least 2 of the parking spaces will be designated as carpool/vanpool spaces. 5. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the ADA spaces will be 9 feet wide, and at least one of the spaces is van accessible, with an 8-foot aisle. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows a sign will be located at the intersection of the access drive into the site and the one-way drive running in front of the existing building that states the drive is one-way/do not enter. 7. Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be provided where the parking abuts landscaping or walkways. 8. Submit a revised parking plan that shows the angle and dimension of parking spaces in front of the existing building. The space and aisle dimensions must be in accordance with Table 18.765.1. 9. Submit a copy of the floor plan for building #1 for staff to confirm that the proposed bicycle parking location is within 50 feet of the entrance. If the location of the bicycle rack is not within 50 feet of the main entrance, the rack must be relocated to meet this requirement. 10. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 11. Submit a copy of a recorded irrevocable shared parking agreement between the two parcels. 12. Submit details of the trash enclosure and refuse container for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. 13. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows landscaping will be provided between the parking lot and all adjacent properties, including the eastern property line. 14. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows all service facilities will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. 15. Submit a revised plan that clearly states the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. 16. Submit evidence of a reciprocal access easement to serve both parcels. 17. Prior to construction, the work area adjacent to the Water Resource Area shall be identified and marked on the site with construction fencing. 18. Prior to any site work, all erosion control measures must be in place and may only be removed after the construction is complete. 19. Submit evidence of DSL and US Army Corps of Engineer approval of storm outfall construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 2 OF 26 20. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the location u. Lne wetland adjacent to Ball Creek and that shows the 50-foot buffer from top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. This buffer must be reflected on all sets of plans and no development other than the storm outfall may be located within this buffer without prior approval. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 21. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the proposed taps to the public sanitary sewer and water lines in SW Bonita Road. The permit will also cover any driveway construction work in the right-of-way (ROW) of Bonita Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 22. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 23. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. 24. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an ingress/egress easement available from Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC to the east of this site. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact the property owner of Tax Lot 200 and work with them to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with the property owner of Tax Lot 200 to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. 25. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised storm drainage plan that indicates they will provide for onsite detention of the additional stormwater runoff from this site, in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards. This plan revision must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department (Brian Rager). 26. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant's proposed water layout plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 27. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 3 OF 26 Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 29. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 30. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall construct a fence (split-rail) to prevent employees from inadvertently disturbing the buffer area. 31. All site improvements shall be installed per the approved plan as revised by the conditions of approval. 32. No truck traffic may back into the site from SW Bonita Road to serve the existing or proposed buildings. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records based on the address 7320 SW Bonita and the "Empire Batteries" project name. No previous land use cases were found on file in the City within the current tracking system. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the south side of SW Bonita Road. The site is bordered on the north, east, and west by property zoned Light Industrial (I-L). Ball Creek runs along the southern property line. On the other side of the creek is property zoned Industrial Park (I-P). To the east are railroad tracks. The property on all sides is developed with industrial uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site currently has 1 building on site. The existing site has non-conforming landscaping and a non-conforming front yard setback. The proposal involves partitioning the existing building off from and upgrading the landscaping and parking areas. The proposal also provides for the construction of 2 new buildings and associated parking. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek which is identified as a major stream on the City's wetland inventory. The applicant proposes to have a storm water outfall to the creek, therefore, Type II Water Resources Overlay review is required. The outfall will involve less then 10 cubic yards of land alteration, therefore, no sensitive lands review is required. After the construction of the storm water outfall, the applicant has proposed to maintain the required 50-foot buffer (as required because the site is adjacent to Ball Creek, a major stream). The property is located at 7320 SW Bonita; WCTM 2S112AC, tax lot 00300. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 4 OF 26 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY O1h..ERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given the opportunity to provide written comments prior to a decision being made. Staff received one letter from a concerned citizen which is summarized below. Copies of the letter submitted are in the public record and are available for review at the City. A concern was raised related to truck access and the need to block SW Bonita Road in order to access the existing building, as well as, adjacent buildings. The concerned property owner indicates that they have been adjacent several times in the middle of the morning in order to have a large truck back in from Bonita Road to service a business that is next door to the east of the subject site. They indicate that, due to the nature of the buildings in the zone, the site should be developed to allow for safe and legal truck access without interrupting normal traffic flows. The concerned property owner requests that the City make certain the applicant has allowed for this access on the property while continuing to provide for the required striped parking and landscaping. Staff Response: The applicant is required to provide loading spaces for the new buildings that will not require backing in from SW Bonita Road. The vehicles must be able to fully maneuver on-site. The site will provide better access for the existing building by providing a mechanism for trucks to go around the building and load from the front. This is addressed further under the off-street parking and loading requirements section of this decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Land Partition 18.420.050 (General Approval Criteria) 18.420.050.4 (Specific Approval Criteria) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.775 Sensitive lands) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resources Overlay) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Land Partion General Approval Criteria Section 18.420.050 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; Because the proposal involves an existing development, it is important that the partition not create a non-conforming situation on the existing development site. In this case, the proposal must maintain the required parking and landscaping for the existing development. Parcel 2 is NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 5 OF 26 reviewed for compliance with the Code standards as part of this Site Development Review. The required parking for the existing building is 7 and the required percent of landscaping in the I-L zone is 15%. After the partition, the applicant will continue to have over 7 parking spaces and the percentage of landscaping will be 8.25%. While this landscape percent is less than required by the zone, it is more than is currently provided, thus the improvements will decrease the non-conformity. The parking is discussed in detail further in this decision under the off-street parking and loading requirements. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, and electricity are available to serve the lots. Additional details and requirements for the proposal to comply with City and Washington County standards are provided under SECTION VI — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS of this decision. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and No improvements are proposed. However, they will meet or will be conditioned to meet, City and applicable agency standards as part of this development further in this decision. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements listed in the next section. The Specific partition requirements are discussed and conditioned, if necessary, further in this decision. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. The details of the access drive and any additional requirements, if necessary, will be addressed further in this decision and conditioned if necessary. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred- year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. While Ball Creek is a major stream, it does not have an identified floodplain adjacent to it. In addition, there are currently no trail studies or trail plans for development along Ball Creek, therefore, a condition to dedicate land for a pathway is not warranted. FINDING: As proposed, all of the Land Partition Approval Criteria have been fully satisfied or will be met as conditioned elsewhere in this decision. Specific Partition Approval Criteria The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The lot width required for the I-P zone is 50 feet. Both parcels will have lot widths in excess of 200 feet, therefore, this standard is satisfied. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. The zone is I-L which does not have a minimum lot area, therefore, this standard does not apply. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. This standard is intended for residential developments. Because this is an industrially zoned site, the parcels must be able to provide for access as required to serve potential development of the parcels. In this case, one 30-foot-wide access drive would be needed to serve developments with up to 100 parking spaces. As discussed further in this NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 6 OF 26 decision, the applicant's proposed access drive meets, or oe conditioned to meet this requirement. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. The following table lists the dimensional standards in the I-P zone From Table 18.530.2 • ` 11.9Mal •arce 'arce I inimum o ize one 1,1 I sq. , ; sq. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. >50 ft >50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 30 ft. Non-conforming N/A [4] - Side facing street on corner & through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A N/A - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 2 ft. min. 0 ft. min. - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3] 4 ft. N/A Maximum Height 45 ft. existing < 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 91.75 75.5% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 8.25% 24.5% "see discussion [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Because the parcel is a flag lot in Industrial zone and the industrial zone setbacks are intended to provide buffer from the street, the front yard setback requirements do not apply to flag lots in this zone. The setbacks for the existing building on Parcel 1 meet the dimensional standards with the exception of the front yard setback which is pre-existing, non-conforming and is not made worse as a result of this partition. While the landscaping is less than required in the base zone, it is more than is currently provided. Because the development will decrease the non-conformity, this is acceptable. In addition, overall, the site will provide the required landscaping. As is demonstrated by the table, the proposed buildings and landscaping on Parcel 2 will comply with the dimensional criteria. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. This standard is intended for residential uses to insure privacy and buffering for both the resident on the flag lot and adjacent lots. Because this is an industrial use, surrounded by industrial uses, which allows 0-foot side and rear yard setbacks, staff has determined that the requirement that side yard setbacks be 10 feet is not applicable. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The parcels have access to SW Bonita Road. Because this area is zoned Industrial and the driveway is adjacent to properties developed with industrial uses, no screening is necessary along the existing access drive. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. The application has been reviewed by the Building Division for compliance with the fire code. The comments received do not indicate additional hydrants are needed. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 7 OF 26 The applicant has proposed an access which will serve both lots, however, a copy of a recorded document has not been provided. As will be discussed further in this decision, there may be an opportunity to share access via an easement with the property owner to the west. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant has not fully met the standards because the applicant has not submitted evidence of a reciprocal easement to serve the parcels. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit evidence of a reciprocal access easement to serve both parcels. B. Applicable Development Code Standards The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 1p8.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Development Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned !Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a walkway will be provided from street to all building entrances. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The plans show the proposed walkway will cross the parking lot in two locations. Both crossings are less than 36 feet in length. The pavement is shown to be striped which will provide a clear distinction of materials. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans do not clearly state that the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002M1LP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 8 OF 26 developments with less than 100 parking spaces is one ..*J-foot access with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will have less that 100 parking spaces and has 1 point of access into the parking lot from SW Bonita Road. There is 30 feet from the property line to the edge of the building and the access will provide 24 feet of pavement. The access is within 50 feet of the building entrances. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access and egress standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that clearly states the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Bonita was widened and recently improved. Street trees were not installed as part of that street improvement and none are proposed as part of this development. Due to the existing conditions along the frontage of the site, however, staff finds that the installation of street trees is not practical. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between a proposed industrial use and existing Industrial uses. The surrounding uses are all permitted uses in the I-L zone. The buffer matrix indicates that when an I-L use abuts an I-L or I-P use, no buffer or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While the majority of the site is not visible from the street, this standard applies to all parking areas abutting adjacent lots. The plans provided indicate that Zable Cherry Laurel will be planted along the western parking lot. No landscaping has been shown adjacent to the eastern parking. Parking lot landscaping is spaced with one (1) tree for every 7 spaces in all areas. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The applicant's plans do not show service facilities will be screened, therefore, Staff can not determine if the standards have been met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 9 OF 26 clearly shows all service facilities (including vaults and transformers) will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2, Staff can determine that the standards are met. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's narrative indicates the refuse container will be screened by a 6-foot chain link enclosure screened with vinyl slats. The enclosure will not be visible from a public street, public parking lot or other public facility. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows landscaping will be provided between the parking lot and all adjacent properties, including the eastern property line. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows all service facilities will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's plans show two trash enclosures will be provided. One 10'x20' enclosure adjacent to the existing building and one 10'x10' enclosure adjacent to building #2. The applicant has obtained the franchise hauler sign-of for the locations and sizes proposed. Because the franchise hauler has accepted the proposed refuse locations, the applicant has met the Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off option. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The locations proposed are not in a required front yard and are centrally located for all users. The proposed locations are not within any required parking areas. The narrative indicates that the refuse containers will be screened by a solid chain link fence with vinyl slats. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 10 OF 26 Because the waste hauler has signed off on the location, it is assumed that the location is accessible to their trucks and meets their locational needs. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit details of the trash enclosure and refuse container for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.7651: Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The plans provide for more than 20 parking spaces, therefore, carpool/vanpool parking is required. The plans do not reserve parking spaces for carpool or vanpool spaces. Based on the number of parking spaces required for the two new buildings (31), 2 spaces must be designated for carpool/vanpool. Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 51 parking spaces over both parcels, therefore, 3 ADA handicap spaces are required, one (1) of which is van accessible (9 feet wide with and 8-foot aisle). The applicant's plans show 3 spaces will be marked as ADA accessible, one adjacent to each building. The spaces adjacent to building #2 and the existing building have an 8-foot aisle but are not 9 feet wide. The space adjacent to building #1 is 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle, thus meeting the standard. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street arking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 11 OF 26 surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and has been discussed previously in this decision. Vision clearance will be addressed further in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed and conditioned previously in this decision. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The interior drives on parcel 2 are two-way and do not require additional markings, however, the applicant has indicated that the access in front of the existing building on Parcel 1 will be one way. The applicant's plans show the driveway marked one-way, however the plans should be revised to show a sign and clear marking from the access drive into the site that says "do not enter" and clearly indicates that the driveway is one-way out. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans do not show wheel stops will be provided adjacent to landscaping or walkways. In order to meet this standard, the applicant must submit a plan that shows wheel stops will be provided. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans show the majority of parking spaces will be 9 feet by 20 feet. There are several spaces, however, including two of the ADA spaces that scales to only 8 feet in width. While 50% of the non-ADA spaces may be compact, the applicant has not clearly indicated which spaces are proposed for compact parking. The access aisle is greater than 24 feet wide in all areas except along the front of the existing building. The area in the front of the existing building is only one-way and will provide a minimum of 16 feet in width. Based on Table 18.765.1, this does not provide adequate back-up room for parking spaces at a 90 degree angle. In order to provide parking off of this one-way drive, the applicant must revise the parking plan so that the parking in front of the existing building is at an angle of at least 60 degrees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 12 OF 26 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The plans show a 2 space bicycle rack will be provided near building #2 and a 4 space bicycle rack will be located near building #1. The applicant has not provided a floor plan of building #1 for staff to confirm that the proposed location is within 50 feet of the entrance. The floor plan of building #2 indicates that the proposed location will be within 50 feet of an entrance into the building. A condition is necessary for the applicant to submit plans that show a bicycle rack will be located within 50 feet of the entrance to building #1. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2% feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for Light Industrial Uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, therefore, 2 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. The applicant's plan show a 2-space bicycle rack will be provided adjacent to building #2 and a 4-space bicycle rack will be provided adjacent to building #1, therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for Light Industrial Uses is 1.6 spaces per 1000 square feet and there is no maximum. The applicant is, therefore, required to provide 31 parking spaces for the two new buildings. The use of the existing building is warehouse, which requires a minimum of 7 spaces and a maximum of 11. The plans show parcel 1 will have 27 parking spaces, however parcel 2 will have only 24. Combined, the total parking is 51 spaces. Because parcel 1 has more than the maximum and parcel 2 has less than the minimum, a shared parking agreement is needed to insure both parcels meet the parking requirements. The applicant has not specifically proposed a shared parking agreement, however, the design indicates that this was intended. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 13 OF 26 Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The existing building has 2 loading spaces in front of the building. Building #1 is over 10,000 square feet and will have 2 loading spaces. Building #2 is less than 10,000 square feet and is not proposed to have loading spaces. A condition is needed that requires the applicant to insure that no truck traffic will back into the site from Bonita to serve the existing or proposed buildings. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows at least 2 of the parking spaces will be designated as carpool/vanpool spaces. • Submit a revised plan that shows all of the ADA spaces will be 9 feet wide, and at least one of the spaces is van accessible, with an 8-foot aisle. • Submit a revised plan that shows a sign will be located at the intersection of the access drive into the site and the one-way drive running in front of the existing building that states the drive is one-way/do not enter. • Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be provided where the parking abuts landscaping or walkways. • Submit a revised parking plan that shows the angle and dimension of parking spaces in front of the existing building. The space and aisle dimensions must be in accordance with Table 18.765.1. • Submit a copy of the floor plan for building #1 for staff to confirm that the lproposed bicycle parking location is within 50 feet of the entrance. If the ocation of the bicycle rack is not within 50 feet of the main entrance, the rack must be relocated to meet this requirement. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. • Submit a copy of a recorded irrevocable shared parking agreement between the two parcels. • No truck traffic may back into the site from SW Bonita Road to serve the existing or proposed buildings. Sensitive Lands (18.775) Landform alterations or developments which involve less than 10 cubic yards of material are permitted outright. Landform alterations or developments that are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies be obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. There are wetlands and floodplains on-site, however, the applicant has proposed to stay out of the required buffer with the exception of the storm outfallwhich will involve less than 10 cubic yards of material. Staff will, however, impose a condition that requires permanent NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 14 OF 26 marking of the buffer areas to insure that there is no disturbai.—i. In addition, the applicant must construct temporary fencing prior to any site work to insure that there is no disturbance of the buffer area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, Staff can determine that there are no sensitive land concerns as a result of this development. CONDITIONS: • Prior to any site work, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing adjacent to the required buffer from Ball Creek. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall construct a fence (split-rail) to prevent employees from inadvertently disturbing the buffer area. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-L Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no trees over 12 inches caliper on the site, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because there are no trees over 12 inches caliper on the site, this standard does not apply. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plans indicate several utilities within the vision clearance area. A site visit confirmed that there are currently no above ground utilities, however the applicant must submit verification that there will be no above ground utilities or vegetation between 3 and 8 feet in height within the vision clearance areas. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows no above ground utilities or vegetation exceeding 3 feet in height will be located in the vision clearance areas. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 15 OF 26 Water Resources Overlay(18.797) Section 18.797 identifies Ball Creek as a Major Stream. The required buffer from this creek is 50 feet from the top of bank or wetland edge whichever is greater. An associated wetland is a significant wetland, all or part of which is within 50 feet of any major stream top-of-bank The applicant has proposed a storm water outfall to Ball Creek. This outfall will be within the water resources buffer. The applicant has indicated that they feel this use most closely relates to "irrigation pumps" in relation to impact, however, there is clearly a category of "underground utility" which most closely fits the use proposed. The applicant has provided an addendum narrative dated May 3, 2000 that addresses the standards of Section 18.797.080. The applicant's plan shows the required 50-foot buffer from top of bank, but the plan does not show the location of a small wetland on-site. Based on the information on the wetland report, staff has determined that this wetland is an associated wetland and, therefore, the buffer must be from the top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. A condition is being imposed that will require the applicant to accurately show the location of this wetland. It appears, however, that the revised location of the buffer will not significantly impact the location of the water quality facility. Extension of under ground utilities within the water resources buffer is a Type II use which must address the following standards: Alternatives considered: Except for stream corridor enhancement, most Type II and III uses are expected to develop outside of water resource and riparian setback areas. Therefore, Type II and III development applications must carefully examine upland alternatives for the proposed use, and explain the reasons why the proposed development cannot reasonably occur outside of the water resource or riparian setback area. The applicant's narrative indicates that the site topography and the topography of the drainage basin required the storm water run-off to be directed to the south of the site into Ball Creek. The Ball Creek culvert under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks is the only gravity fed drainage option available. The proposed storm water outfall pipe is necessary to convey storm water from the water quality facility to Ball Creek. While an open channel is an alternative, it would also require ground disturbance and would have a greater potential for erosion. The option chosen is the only option that meets the need with minimal impact and erosion. Minimize siting impacts: The proposed use shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and adverse hydrological impacts on water resources. For Type 11 and III uses, the Civil Engineer, with experience in water quality, must certify that any adverse water quality impacts of the development proposal will be minimized, consistent with best management practices. For all uses, the development shall be located as far from the water resource, and use as little of the water resource or riparian setback area, as possible, recognizing the operational needs of the proposed development. The applicant's Engineer, Kim McMillan, P.E. has designed the stormwater facility and the related outfall to specifically minimize erosion and impacts during construction. The only work in the riparian zone is the 8" outfall. In order to avoid potential erosion, the outfall energy dissipation area must be located near the creek within the riparian zone. Construction materials and methods: Where development within the riparian area is unavoidable, construction materials or methods used within the riparian setback area shall minimize damage to water quality and native vegetation. The applicant's narrative states that the work will be completed with a track hoe and 2' wide bucket. The track hoe will remain more than 10 feet from the edge of Ball Creek and extend the bucket to complete the required work. The work is anticipated to be completed within one day. The applicant has indicated all required erosion control measures will be in place prior to and throughout construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 16 OF 26 • Minimize flood damage: Aboveground residential structures shall not be permitted within the WR Overlay district, where such land is also within the 100-year floodplain. On-site flood storage capacity shall not decrease as a result of development. The cumulative effects of any proposed development shall not reduce flood storage capacity or raise base flood elevations on- or off-site. Any new commercial or industrial land development proposed within the 100-year floodplain shall be designed consistent with Chapter 18.775, Sensitive Lands. No residential structures are proposed. Avoid steep slopes: Within 50 feet of any water resource, excavation and vegetation removal shall be avoided on slopes of 25% or greater and in areas with high erosion potential (as shown on SCS maps), except where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. The work area within the riparian zone does not involve any slopes that exceed 25%. Minimize impacts on existing vegetation: The following standards shall apply when construction activity is proposed in areas where vegetation is to be preserved. Temporary measures used for initial erosion control shall not be left in place permanently; Work areas on the immediate site shall be carefully identified and marked to reduce potential damage to trees and vegetation; Trees shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing working equipment. During clearing operations, trees and vegetation shall not be permitted to fall or be placed outside the work area; In areas designated for selective cutting or clearing, care in falling and removing trees and brush shall be taken to avoid inuring trees and shrubs to be left in place; Stockpiling of soil, or soil mixed with vegetation, shall not be permitted on a permanent basis. The applicant has stated that all temporary erosion control devices will be removed once the native grasses have been re-established. The applicant has indicated that prior to construction, the work areas will be carefully identified and marked to reduce potential damage to trees and vegetation. A condition to this affect will be required. The applicant has stated that no trees will be used for anchoring or stabilizing equipment and that trees will not be permitted to fall or be placed outside of the work area. The condition to clearly mark the work area will help to insure this standard is met. The project does not involve selective cutting as there are no trees in the area of the resource area. The applicant states there may be temporary stockpiling of material, however, soil will not be stockpiled after the ditch is backfilled. Vegetation mitigation plan: If a Type II or III use is proposed within a water resource site or riparian setback area, or mitigation is proposed as a method to reduce the riparian setback in accordance with Section 18.797.100, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented. The applicant shall be responsible for re-vegetating areas temporarily disturbed by excavation on a 1:1 basis; Where approval is granted to reduce the riparian setback area, the applicant shall be responsible for mitigating for the reduced setback by replacing non-native vegetation within the remaining, protected riparian setback area on a 1.5:1 basis. That is, for each 100 square feet of riparian setback that is lost to development, at least 150 square feet of existing disturbed area within the riparian setback or wetland shall be re-planted with native plant species; The re- vegetation plan shall provide for the replanting and maintenance of native plant species designed to achieve pre-disturbance conditions. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any native plant species that do not survive the first two years after planting, and for ensuring the survival of any replacement plants for an additional two years after their replacement. The proposal does not request a reduction in the riparian setback area; therefore, this standard does not apply. The applicant has stated in the narrative that native grasses will be re-seeded and will be monitored for two years. Any areas which are not re-vegetated during that period will be re-planted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 17 OF 26 Water and sewer infiltration and discharge: Water and sanitary sewer facilities shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid infiltration of floodwaters into the system, and to avoid discharges from such facilities to streams and wetlands. The proposed work in the riparian zone does not include any water or sanitary sewer facilities, therefore, this standard does not apply. On-site systems: On-site septic systems and private wells shall be prohibited within the WR Overlay district. No septic systems or private wells are proposed. Erosion control plan: If a Type II or III use is proposed within a water resource site or riparian setback area, the erosion control standards of 18.797.080.J shall apply within the WR Overlay and be adhered to. The applicant's narrative indicates that the erosion control standards of 18.797.080.J will be followed. A condition will be attached requiring the erosion control measures be in place prior to construction and removed only after construction has been completed. The condition to clearly mark the construction area will insure that this is further satisfied. This approval is based on the applicant acknowledging the above standards will be adhered to. Plan implementation: A schedule of planned erosion control and re-vegetation measures shall be provided which sets forth the progress of construction activities, and mitigating erosion control measures. An approved Erosion Control of Re-vegetation Plan shall be implemented and maintained as follows: Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to any stripping or excavation work: The applicant shall implement the measures and construct facilities contained in the approved Erosion Control Plan in a timely manner. During active construction, the applicant shall inspect erosion control measures daily, and maintain, adjust, repair or replace erosion control measures to ensure that they are functioning properly; Eroded sediment shall be removed immediately from pavement surfaces, off-site areas, and from the surface water management system, including storm drainage inlets, ditches and culverts; Water containing sediment shall not be flushed into the surface water management system, wetlands or streams without first passing through an approved sediment filtering facility or device; In addition, the applicant shall call for City inspection, prior to the foundation inspection for any building, to certify that erosion control measures are installed in accordance with the erosion control plan. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan that will insure the standards are met. The applicant has indicated that erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained throughout the project. They have also states that all sediment will be contained to the work area or promptly removed from other areas and that sediments will not be flushed in to the surface water management systems, wetlands or stream. A condition will be required that all erosion control measures be in place prior to beginning construction. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Water Resources Overlay standards are not fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to construction, the work area adjacent to the Water Resource Area shall be identified and marked on the site with construction fencing. Prior to any site work, all erosion control measures must be in place and may only be removed after the construction is complete. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 18 OF 26 • Submit evidence of DSL and US Army Corps of Engineer approval of storm outfall construction. • Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the location of the wetland adjacent to Ball Creek and that shows the 50-foot buffer from top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. This buffer must be reflected on all sets of plans and no development other than the storm outfall may be located within this buffer without prior approval. Note: The applicant, by submitting a proposal to comply with these standards, accepts responsibility in insuring that the proposed methods are utilized during construction. If construction activities do not comply with the standards specified, the applicant is responsible. C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the rovisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the building and all site improvements outside of the buffer area. There are no trees on the site. There are no known areas subject to sliding. Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division, however, they have indicated that the plans satisfy the fire code requirements for hydrant location. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be larovided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 19 OF 26 and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and requested that the applicant submit a lighting plan for review and approval. FINDING: Because information from the Police Department indicates that a lighting plan is needed in order to verify that the lighting meets the crime prevention and safety criteria, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant provides a lighting plan to the Police Department for review and approval, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit to the Police Department, an outdoor lighting plan for review and approval. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Bonita and is less then 1/4 mile from SW 72nd Avenue which is a Tri-met transit route. Staff sent a request for comments to Tri-met, however, they did not respond with a request for the applicant to provide additional transit facilities along the frontage. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the flood lain. This area shall include p portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. While Ball Creek is a major stream, it does not have an identified floodplain adjacent to it. In addition, there are currently no trail studies or trail plans for development along Ball Creek, therefore, a condition to dedicate land for a pathway is not warranted. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings as part of a light industrial park. The zone is I-L, which allows light industrial uses in this zone. It is the applicant's burden to insure that all prospective tenants fall within the use classifications for light industrial zones. Dimensional Requirements: The table identified previously in this decision compared the dimensional requirements with the proposed improvements. Based on the information provided and discussed in that table, staff has determined that the underlying dimensional standards have been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above and elsewhere in this decision, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 20 OF 26 A. Street And Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway was improved in recent years by the City. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary, with the exception of street trees. There are no street trees along the frontage of this site. However, due to the existing conditions along the frontage, installation of street trees is not practical. There is an existing driveway on SW Bonita Road that serves the existing building on Parcel 1. The applicant's plan indicates that they plan to close the existing driveway and construct a new one at the eastern boundary of the site. This new driveway would serve both Parcels 1 and 2. The property owner to the east, Mr. John Skourtes, who owns Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC, contacted the City regarding access into the subject site. Mr. Skourtes informed Staff that he had previously granted the owner of this parcel an ingress/egress easement over their existing driveway abutting their western boundary. This would make sense to Staff because SW Bonita Road is a very busy major collector street, and consolidation of driveways is preferable to improve traffic flow and prevent interruptions. Staff was not able to confirm the existence of an official easement, but Mr. Skourtes indicated that such an easement does exist. In light of this, Staff finds that the applicant must explore this issue further prior to issuance of the site permit. The applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an easement available to them. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact Mr. Skourtes and work with him to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with Mr. Skourtes to provide a joint driveway.across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing concrete sidewalk along the frontage of this site. No further improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 21 OF 26 There is an existing 10-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Bonita Road adjacent to this site. The applicants plan indicates that they will tap the main line to bring a 4-inch lateral into the site to serve the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's plan appears to accommodate any upstream flows that pass through this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is required for this project. The applicant's plans do not clearly reflect if they have addressed this issue. Therefore, the applicant will need to revise their plan to provide for onsite detention. It appears the applicant could easily meet this standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they must construct an outfall pipe from their water quality facility down to Ball Creek at the south end of the site. According the applicant's engineer, the amount of disturbance within the 50-foot riparian setback will be less than 10 cubic yards. Therefore, no Sensitive Lands approval is required. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. As stated previously, there are no trails planned within this area, therefore, this standard does not apply Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 22 OF 26 temporary utility service facilities during construction, 1..ah capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are no overhead utility lines that need to be addressed. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: A thorough review of fire and life safety will be conducted by the Building Division and TVFR during the building permit review phase. Public Water System: There is an existing public water line located in SW Bonita Road that presently serves this site. The applicant s plan indicates that the main line will be tapped to provide new domestic and fire service for the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. The Public Works Department shall review and approve of the final water system layout for this site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates that an extended dry detention pond will be placed at the southeast corner of the site to treat the onsite runoff. Staff reviewed the preliminary sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer and finds that the proposed pond should adequately treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 23 OF 26 completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assignin addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit(s). For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning suite numbers for the tenant spaces and the property managers or owners are responsible for keeping the City updated as to any changes in suite layouts. This information must then be given to the City so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so City Staff can assign suite numbers. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. B. Impact Study (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard,and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $25,787 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $80,584 ($25,787 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 24 OF 26 impact of this project on the transportation system is $54,79 . The applicant will not be required to construct any off-site improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1. Building #1 — South wall shall be one-hour construction. 2. Building #1 — where proposed tir storage exceeds 6'0", the requirements of UFC Article 81 will apply. 3. Railroad — the site must comply with ODOT rules set out in OAR, Chapter 74, division 300 through 355. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and requested a lighting plan be submitted for their review and approval. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: Public Water Improvements (6-inch fire line and meters) to be approved through public works. Water meters to be in landscaped areas only. Meter locations to be a minimum 15'0" from driveway. All water meters (existing and new) shall have a minimum of reduced pressure principle device (backflow) assembly installed directly behind the meter (customer side). Backflow protection for the fire line shall be in the form of double detector check valve assembly in a vault. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has not provided comments or objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the body of this decision with the following exception: "Mr. Schott's wetland analysis indicates the existence of an emergent wetland on the site. The wetland and it's required vegetated corridor must be shown on the construction plans. Construction plans must provide a detailed vegetated corridor restoration plan, in accordance with the requirements of R&O 99-44". Union Pacific Railroad has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "No additional drainage will be allowed toward our right-of-way and tracks." US Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the proposal and indicated that a Corps permit will be required for the storm water outfall if there is a discharge of fill material. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODF&W) had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided comments which are summarized below: Comments focused on the width of the riparian area necessary to provide functional fish and wildlife habitat and storm water issues. ODF&W recommends that the width of the buffer be increased to 100 feet. This recommended buffer width is based on research that says the buffer should be 2x the height of potential trees on-site. Ball creek is managed as a fish-bearing stream. Appropriate storm water detention and treatment facilities are recommended to treat impervious area. These facilities should not encroach into the riparian buffer setback. Staff Response: Staff can not currently require a larger buffer than that required by the development code. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 25 OF 26 AT&T, TCI Cable, P(,c, GTE, US West, DSL, Tri-met and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 4, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 19, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp e�al: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON MAY18, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. ,,j; ��ed r " /��` May 4, 2000 PREPARED- Y: Julia Po ell Hajduk DATE Associate Planner May 4, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. B- ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I\curpin\Julia\sdr\Empire Batteries.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002—EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 26 OF 26 3 A Yi E I 1 . . p s s%,c C •g N rIII l / y o , Miiil ili - A 14 v+ iIG..� �.. r N 4RiI i , 1,1�' O 71 - S ® 1I I f I i dA 11-41 -� _ ft!! ; IM 7 ; tea i'.....-... PI' 414. — , „,,,... 7.1svM u f \ 1 v �•\ ..�mss. - j/ I co �,o`� '` I! 1 j a �9o�aad � I i' (•ll .bs Oi0 8f) i / R Z s I �� I 101 n �_�� a �� ::i a3SOd02ld ' � .... o*1/4, . \\ 11777;:.. __ N V ' z N SOd02ld K \ F. . 1111 1 ♦ "s WCG■ / . 1 „.n<m. m O �9NIQ'TU1� i 4., 1."'.... — m_-'� _ . - - �� �.,.. ;.lqi•' %! 1 — ,. 1-71 0 N '�\ t —� - inii,n 3 I .v ,..,.. ... v �a....l - _ Ic-i - r i m ,.....j.:.,:::./ :�fir:-9. , II! N O • —:bI 0 _..0 1sl 1 ll O O O O N CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION s� s • ' 3 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 111'371M Illik- 1 VICINITY MAP Oh' lb. ���t la �- :,; MOW SDR2000-00002 =,r `� MLP2000-00002 all 'G EMPIRE 7 VI BATTERIES, INC. .* �AJER *In�� .a-'^" SUBJECT in .� VJ - � � a owl,"'• ` tSITE AM �, 1p'7 BONIT•RD -� Niapp.1111w- (..-----\ \\ T- all. r.' o� r to Cm J A N CARDINAL LN Eif _____ — . iii 0 400 B00 Feet /) ceat t"=595 feet REDWOOD LN in ,.+,J.I∎, xp ..-314-0,��. ( City of Tigard ■■. — 7 Information on this map is for general location only and - 4:: 61.11111111111161 1. should be vented with the Development Services Dlwsion 13125 SW Hall Blvd _ . 111 ■i■i■iir'r 4 Tigard,(5 63 9171 a (503)639-4171 ....4119 -- `R� http/lwww.ciliplyd.or.us■ Community Development Plot date:Mar 9,2000;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 411, SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 CITY OFTIGARD EMPIRE BATTERIES Community(Development S/apingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 7/4/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00002 Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and, therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Empire Batteries, Inc. Engineered Structures 7320 SW Bonita Road 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light-Industrial; I-L. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705 CRITERIA: 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Full Decision located at City Hall. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 4, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 19, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. VA eal: ector's Decision is finer on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON MAY 18, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. ------ '3 is L4 zr - ..411-7 -SWBONITA ROAD--- ----)iBj4 11. : 4 1111 1 In ."- 1 ..e / I 11 4; 117W r 411111441 1 I , , 172, o I o dY ' -T_1� Z\e1 ! I A S !� ! Q: aB J o a. .0,.,. t..., II g, 1` ' 010�� d AI 1 s �j.\\\\\` 1 1= yli u- 11,IJ U : =e:-- ;-;- CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2000-000021MLP2000-00002 SITE PLAN EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. (Nap Is not to mole) 111111 VICINITY MAP •�� - Tr.. SDR2000 00002 `�� I1� �= MLP2000 00002• ..li '�n1 EMPIRE 'b! "" ►_, .� SUBJECT u? BATTERIES, INC. ii r I SITE - 1 •:::: ism fah 1001, -----\- —� —1 N ■ 1 ////fir it �� .t4 HOB'j wow no"f."to a Ma 11 Cory of Tigard ;II p/ / / $ :r r y —__ .L ....-•....... 1 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW T O CITY OF TI TIGARD Community'Development Shaping Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 9, 2000 FILE NO. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 23. 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addre. ,ie relevant approval criteria with .icient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." VICINITY MAP * , SDR2000-00002•v� uP ► V S MLP2000 00002 Hq",,. ® ;:Is EMPIRE•• 0. s BATTERIES, INC. �i ®� 11"" . SUBJECT SITE i :pp Lii � f r 1 iI 1 N• NM PO Feel 1. — Ai ��111 ins : City ofTigard _ LI I. �uitmp 3 WN,a - . ; 11 MEW ,u9 a.. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 2, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2000-00002/MLP 2000-00002, Empire Batteries Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway was improved in recent years by the City. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary, with the exception of street trees. There are no street trees along the frontage of this site. However. due to the existing conditions along the frontage. installation of street trees is not practical. There is an existing driveway on SW Bonita Road that serves the existing building on Parcel 1 . The applicant's plan indicates that they plan to close the existing driveway and construct a new one at the eastern boundary of the site. This new driveway would serve both Parcels 1 and 2. The property owner to the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 1 east, Mr. John Skourtes, who owns Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC, contacted the City regarding access into the subject site. Mr. Skourtes informed Staff that he had previously granted the owner of this parcel an ingress/egress easement over their existing driveway abutting their western boundary. This would make sense to Staff because SW Bonita Road is a very busy major collector street, and consolidation of driveways is preferable to improve traffic flow and prevent interruptions. Staff was not able to confirm the existence of an official easement, but Mr. Skourtes indicated that such an easement does exist. In light of this, Staff finds that the applicant must explore this issue further prior to issuance of the site permit. The applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an easement available to them. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact Mr. Skourtes and work with him to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with Mr. Skourtes to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing concrete sidewalk along the frontage of this site. No further improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 10-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Bonita Road adjacent to this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will tap the main line to bring a 4-inch lateral into the site to serve the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. Storm Drainage: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 2 General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's plan appears to accommodate any upstream flows that pass through this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is required for this project. The applicant's plans do not clearly reflect if they have addressed this issue. Therefore, the applicant will need to revise their plan to provide for onsite detention. It appears the applicant could easily meet this standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they must construct an outfall pipe from their water quality facility down to Ball Creek at the south end of the site. According the applicant's engineer, the amount of disturbance within the 50-foot riparian setback will be less than 10 cubic yards. Therefore, no Sensitive Lands approval is required. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 3 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. '722??7227722222 Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 4 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are no overhead utility lines that need to be addressed. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: A thorough review of fire and life safety will be conducted by the Building Division and TVFR during the building permit review phase. Public Water System: There is an existing public water line located in SW Bonita Road that presently serves this site. The applicant's plan indicates that the main line will be tapped to provide new domestic and fire service for the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. The Public Works Department shall review and approve of the final water system layout for this site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 5 frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates that an extended dry detention pond will be placed at the southeast corner of the site to treat the onsite runoff. Staff reviewed the preliminary sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer and finds that the proposed pond should adequately treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit(s). For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning suite numbers for the tenant spaces and the property managers or owners are responsible for keeping the City updated as to any changes in suite layouts. This information must then be given to the City so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 6 system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so City Staff can assign suite numbers. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required •for this project to cover the proposed taps to the public sanitary sewer and water lines in SW Bonita Road. The permit will also cover any driveway construction work in the ROW of Bonita Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 7 Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an ingress/egress easement available from Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC to the east of this site. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact the property owner of Tax Lot 200 and work with them to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with the property owner of Tax Lot 200 to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised storm drainage plan that indicates they will provide for onsite detention of the additional stormwater runoff from this site, in accordance with USA Design and Construction Standards. This plan revision must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department (Brian Rager). Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant's proposed water layout plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 8 facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. is\eng\b n an r\comments\sd r`sd r2000-00002-a.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00002 Empire Batteries PAGE 9 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY o TIGARD Community(Deveropment Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: Lori Dorney,US West Communications FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLP)2000-00002 >EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.1 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: fkijfk4- y i > d wiS i bE Q3 Es i 16,121.1Qb2.y 't L- -1S9 c. (Trease provide the fotrowmg information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number[sl: MAR-29-00 WED 04:30 PM SIWA FAX:503 621 30')5 PAGE 2 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TtGARD Community(Devefopment °.` Shapingl Better Community ITE: March 9,2000 TO: Oregon Department of Fish 8 Wildlife FROM: giN of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell HONK Associate Planner(x407) Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax (503)6847297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SOB)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION[IMP)2000-00002 ➢EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.< PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMM LVI.BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (m6,dte tnovi4e the fe owing information)Name of Person(s)Commentintt: MAR-29-00 WED 04:30 PM SIWA FAX:503 621 30')5 PAGE 3 Review of Application: City of Tigard: SDR 2000-00002/MLP 2000-00002 Review Date: March 28, 2000 Reviewed by: ODFW, Jim Grimes (503) 621--3488 Applicant: Empire Batteries, Inc. 1 . The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed project. The Department is tasked with managing fish and wildlife resources for the benefit of present and future generations. Our comments are focused on the potential species and habitat present near the project area. In urban areas, fish and wildlife habitat is primarily limited to stream, wetland, and associated riparian areas. Our comments are focused on the width of the riparian area necessary to provide functional fish and wildlife habitat and stormwater issues . 2 . Research is available that speaks to riparian buffers necessary to provide functional fish and wildlife habitat and minimize impacts (stormwater, visual disturbance) of the developed landscape to on-site and off-site habitats. Research indicates that functional riparian buffer widths equal or exceed 2x the height of a site potential tree. For this site, Douglas fir is the dominant species. A potential tree height here is approximately 100 - 200 feet, according to the Washington County Soil Survey Book. Accordingly, a fully functioning buffer ranges from 200 - 400 feet. The proposed buffer is less that this width. Accordingly, we recommend that the riparian buffer should be increased. A riparian buffer equal to one potential tree height provides 90% of the buffer functions. Accordingly, we recommend a riparian buffer width of 100 feet to minimize impacts from the adjacent development and allow for improvements to the aquatic and riaprian habitats . 3 . Ball Creek is managed as a fish-bearing stream. Habitat in the vicinity may support or should support a range of fish and wildlife, such as cutthroat trout, steelhead trout, Pacific lamprey, red-legged frogs, passerine birds, etc. 4. Appropriate stormwater detention and treatment facilities are recommended to treat impervious area. The facilities should not encroach into the riparian buffer setback. The discharge from the facilities should mimic sheet flow into the buffer area rather than a point discharge into creek channel. End of Review 44, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING T� 47-6)41 Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager F_I OM:�' �' City of Tigard Planning Division Et:AE 1 7 ZC�JO CITY OF i STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner(x401) Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLP)2000-00002 -EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC.. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square ' feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is ' required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity May and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: c,A ' - j„/„T /MP/Lov lErur$ (6, -/NGA/ C L(L rvE ,4r o METF.../LS) v96002z4V :J Pt e'4G/c_ Lie/Lk-3 . l 14r.1..., /016-2-Z u BE /Al Z44urUSc,Q Z9 /41/245X-3 Diva 4i 76.E Gvr..�4Tt.'x1 c Tv L A- /LIMJ//MU/Yl /S/--a" cite)/kr i)/r.�v ,�cb� . .4u. 1"A-ran_ m ?2S /�kiSrrn,G /?iJO itl 51Q.c/.c. XIA v A- ) /,vcn-yarn vF /�Et�ac�-1? /2 su� C 4 H46 y /w 4 77)/,2 4crE-y BEht/4/0 0/6-/n6TE - (Cus7c,Ma-►_ S,oE , BACK45lQjfiZo7X-7LTit/U FGV[-- ,/6- , t /A c .5144u , /iv 71/‘ `Gn.M o�% L�vc,&, - �7�7�CT�.+� t?��� Vi-VC ,9556/n6t-y //✓ ./4 14614-7-, (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number[sl: I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: Clifford C.Cabe,Southern Pacific Transportation Company Rail Road Construction Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division RECEIVED PLANNING STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner[x4071 I ,A R 2 8 '000 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 CIT r OF 1 aUARD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[50111 2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION[PALM 2000-00002 ➢EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.< PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. �c Written comments provided below: �� 1 /S �o u.o Tc L/O�CJ / 4c-/r'/e Z"1-1L-49--e2 4-o C .SPrc) 2• Alo Al7pi7 /o a-44mir9.C-rE o '/LG OE /,-c."--a(.vfr—ACZ) 7,751,9,0-1=> C71.4 12- 10/i , �✓Leil'G"S, (P1 ase provide the following information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: I Phone Number's): cg 7 z- /8'09 I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIO TIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping (Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 W cam,y,,, Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program IOW Td City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLP]2000-00002 >EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.< PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Cease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: LC W A. ` I Phone Number[sl: MEMORANDUM DATE: March 22, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Walker, USA SUBJECT: Empire Batteries Inc. SDR 2000-00002IMLP20000-00002 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer, including extension of public sewer to lot 2 and adjacent properties not currently served. Applicant must fill out and submit an Industrial Waste form to the Agency before any permits are issued STORM SEWER Each Lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer; private storm systems should not cross adjacent parcel. A public storm conveyance is needed from the existing building through the new lot to Ball Creek. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. If the facility is to serve both lots it should be a public facility. SENSITIVE AREAS Mr. Schott's wetland analysis indicates the existence of an emergent wetland on the site. The wetland and it's required vegetated corridor must be shown on the construction plans. Construction plans must provide a detailed vegetated corridor restoration plan, in accordance with the requirements of R&O 96-44 Mar-13-00 07 :O1A TCI S+. _ Helens 503 397 5686 P.02 • i REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD ('ummunityDcs&pmcM Shaping'4 Better('otninutnty DATE March 9,2000 TO: Pat McCann,AT a T Cable FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone: (503)639.4111/Fax: (5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLP1 2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. if You are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (.(easc provide the /Towing inf vmaticrn)Name of Person[sl Commenting:' _ T / Phone Number[sl: (.1'. Mar- 13-00 07 :O1A TCI S4-_Helens 503 397 5686 P.01 IC ' FAX COVER SHEET DATE : 3/3 L C.- TIME: 7:3S-4/ "./ IM TO: .' E ,lCc/ -et? • , FROM : 1 Z/ 7 l.. cr:. Lt y `c! • A-rc T L!ttLLE -,=g-Yic€s 14200 S .W. IRIGADOON CT. BEAVERTON , OREGON 97005 PHONE : ( 503 ) 605-4895 FAX: ( 503 ) 646-3004 NUMBER OF PAGES IN THIS TRANSMISSION INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET : NOTES : • TCI of Tualatin Valley.Inc. '4200 S.W.Bngadoon Court Beaverton,OR 97005 (503)605.4895 FAX(503)646.2004 An Erval O .o.un•i Emp:uyw REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYOF TIGARD Community Deveropment Shaping Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: US Army Corps.of Engineers FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division ' STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x401] Phone: (503)639-41111 Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.- PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ! AO / • OAF/ Alm I ! GLe4 a4 . 11 / • I (Please provide thefoirowing information)Name of Person[s1 Commeging: 1� s�zzC�l tl�, Phone Numher[sJ: �'�e- ��t REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division P"11,R 2 0 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner(x4071 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: (503)604-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLPI 2000-00002 >EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC.1 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (�Yfease provide the fotrounng information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: AYA I Phone Numher(sl: —44X, I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITYYOOF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department MAR 2 0 2000 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner(x407) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMLPI 2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity May and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (PCease provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAR 0 9 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner 1x4071 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION(MLP)2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES, PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. k Written comments provided below: - 94(VtSk 1■5\ok'n plG • (141ka;\ Q-1-)c +o( Q1oif15 (Please provide the forrowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: 3 W4 I Phone Number(s): ),),o I , �'� CITY OF REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD R�$ Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 R F,C _, INTFAM TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official MAP y 7941 BY: FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SOB)2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION[MLPI 2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. II you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: c (Cease provide thefolTowing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: 6649 I Phone Number(s): -4v I Page 1 of 1 SDR 2000-0002 Comments: 1. Building number 1 - South wall shall be one-hour construction 2. Building number 1 -where proposed tir storage exceeds 6' 0", the requirements of UFC Article 81 will apply. 3. Railroad -The site must comply with ODOT rules set out in OAR, Chapter 74, Division 300 through 355. Bob Poskin file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00003.HTM 03/20/2000 Page 1 of 1 SDR 2000-0002 Comments: 1. Building number 1 - South wall shall be one-hour construction 2. Building number 1 -where proposed tir storage exceeds 6' 0", the requirements of UFC Article 81 will apply. 3. Railroad -The site must comply with ODOT rules set out in OAR, Chapter 74, Division 300 through 355. Bob Poskin file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00002.HTM 03/21/2000 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: March 9,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x4071 Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2000-00002/MINOR LAND PARTITION IMP]2000-00002 EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: March 23, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the forfcrwing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: CITY ' TIGARD REQUEST FOR COW- 7NTS NOTIFICATION liaT FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CIT Area: [C1 ID (S1 [w] CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS ®Place tar review In Library CIT Bolds) FILE NMI: .5,D!(Z2Mr/'nc'2/✓H!_P.zn-Y - ,--1--,----, NAME(SM: 4,iii'f/' 0,-, r, CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,sepe so _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./ovipmm Svcs Technicians _POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevenlanofhcer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,a+rtmg onK,al _ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,eabnnf Review Engineer C%AVATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utsihes Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS ,y _TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE * 'TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY * %,l Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS "-% Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 , PO Box 23483 L---11S ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. , r Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regbnal Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powertinea in Area) OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro.OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis icPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Scott King(cPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Mike Borreson(Engineer) CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Jim Tice(Ica) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Tom Harry(General Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Forth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Phil Healy(General Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Sr.Cartographer tcr•r,rzcoien re Portland,OR 97204 _Jim Nims(zCA)MS 15 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 ��A /_/9/ ` repot i l Jane Estes,Permit Specialist I. z;S���isyy' / W G✓ h 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Vv ^eLL�/77 Portland,OR 97221-2414 /✓ UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern Santa Fe WR Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 :—"V_SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (It Project is Wallin'/.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: 0R030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE(Apps E.of HalVN of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT If WITHIN Ea OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (Revised: 2-Nov-99) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ` TIGCITY or`.1L Community(Development S hoping A Better Community STATE OAF OkcGo9V ) County o f Washington )ss. City of wgard ) I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: C, AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) I City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002 - EMPIRE BATTERIES AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . • / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) City of Tigard Planning Director _ Tigard Hearings Officer I Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) City of Tigard Planning Director - Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: E - _ I (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhi l "B" on May 4,2000, and%=Site' in th a lJnited States Mail on May 4,2000, postage prepaid. rip (--e-rir."7-entred ► •ti - Subscribed and sworn/affirmed b• 'ore me on the day of ,, , 2000. OFFICIAL SEAL N ' i y OE6 SHERMAN S.CASPER NOTARY PUSUC-OREGON"J CO MISSION NO 323409 My Commission Expires: 4 Za i' NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 EXHIHIT A. CITY OfTIGARD EMPIRE BATTERIES Shaping Bett(Development muity 120 DAYS = 7/4/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00002 Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and, therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Empire Batteries, Inc. Engineered Structures 7320 SW Bonita Road 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light-Industrial; I-L. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705 CRITERIA: 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Full Decision located at City Hall. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 4, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 19, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal TTector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Community Development Code Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 3:30 PM ON MAY 18, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. -SW IONITA ROAD i•!�ifI-1'— 1 111 4) _� 9 ,;.-�T��-��Wit'.Vim...-V �t pi `� m Z 1\ �a9 O E"° o o \s., �, II p i53 I l•Rf 1 All 1: \O':1 • H L I % 'A\ � II �\\ LL `.o\ iL � , e;, 0 AV a 11 E ;�` tI-M1 I U I;t "ie=Z7 — CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2000-00002IMLP2000-00002 s• •pu►M EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. (Nap is no[fo scale) VICINITY MAP SDR2000-00002 ''r°� `� MLP2000-00002 , - -- EMPIRE I \ SUBJECT' BATTERIES, INC. SITE•',7 ' __ill 1, ,�, __ 117Ia IN 1 II\ I i - • '‘v_ Y,III IOW;io WA Mr% .en AY III 2 III 0111118 We I r"-M ///■■1 �� , +.. . ._...... i 111 ■■■////r: 1 1 .--.„+ " (py, / o,F ) EXHIBIT B 2S112AA-00500 2 • 2AB-00800 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP FOUG • -ANY INC 4380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 PO BO 375• PORTLAND,OR 97201 Ti.RD,OR 97223 25112AB-00900 2S112AB-01000 FOUGHT AND COMPANY INC. BIG T INVESTMENTS PO BOX 23759 2314 SE PARKCREST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98684 2S112AB-01100 2S112AB-01200 PIKE RICHARD G TRUSTEE TENNANT INVESTORS 7235 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 1658 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112AB-01300 2S112AB-01600 BONITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP 7333 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 324 PORTLAND,OR 97223 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 25112AB-01700 2S1 •B-01900 TI D CI OF TRI-C•.. ,•USTRIAL 13125 ALL 2106 •C 0 ST T RD, OR 223 - AUKIE,OR 97222 2S112AB-01901 2. 12AB-02000 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL TRI- •UN DUSTRIAL 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 .'CH000 ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKI , •R 97222 2S112AC-00100 2S112AC-00101 WHITLATCH PHYLLIS IRENE TRUSTEE UNION CENTRAL LIFE 14529 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 888 TIGARD,OR 97224 CINCINNATI,OH 45240 2S112AC-00200 2S112AC-00300 NATIONAL SAFETY CO MOORE ROD A ET AL 17010 SW WEIR RD do EMPIRE BATTERIES INC BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112AC-00400 2S112AC-00500 NATIONAL SAFETY CO SKOURTES JOHN R 14480 YORBA 17010 SW WEIR ROAD CHINO,CA 91710 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-00600 112AC-007.• BHK PROPERTIES LLC BH• •R•• RTIES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 142;• • 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD, •- •7224 2S112AC-00800 2S112AC-00801 BH •-OP IES LLC TI •'D CI •F 14280 : • 2ND AVE 13125 • •■ HALL T "ARID, OR '7224 T :'RD,O' !7223 2S112AC-00900 2S 2AC-01000 KNHS DEVELOPMENT CO PACIF • 'E: ASSOCIATES 26262 S MERIDIAN RD 153 a 'I • •UOIA PKWY#300-WMI AURORA,OR 97002 •ORTLAND,OR "7224 2S112AC-01100 2S112AC-012•• PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES KN' •E OPMENT CO 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 2626 M •IAN RD PORTLAND, OR 97224 :FORA,OR 97002 112AC-01500 2S112AC-02100 PA IC R • ASSOCIATES CHAMBERLAIN-HUSSA PROPERTIES 153 • SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 18755 SW TETON "-•RTLAND, 97224 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02200 2S112AC-02300 CROMBIE ALLEN P C&C DEVELOPMENT 632 CHARMAN ST PO BOX 4010 OREGON CITY, OR 97045 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02400 2S112AC-02500 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14725 SW 72ND 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH TIGARD,OR 97224 OMAHA, NE 68102 2S112AD-00500 112AD-0050 UNION CENTRAL LIFE UNION . •• RAL LIFE PO BOX 888 PO :o 88; CINCINNATI,OH 45240 ' NCINNATI,OH 45240 2S 112AD-00600 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC 1876 BY PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT MIAMI, FL 33102 • SDQ Naomi Gallucci 0 '� 11285 SW 78th Avenue CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, OR 97223 EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 12-Apr-00 Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping l4 Better Community STATE off'O EGow ) County of Was fiington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appmpnale 000(5)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: • AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) - City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002 - EMPIRE BATTERIES AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: • AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director .❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I • AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: G I (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing.if applicable) A cop of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marl e habit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhihit'B", on Ma 4 201 and d: ••sited • the United States Mail on May 4,2000, postage prepaid. A -er . - 'rep:red tice " Subscribed and sworn/a�rmefore me on the � day of , 2000. OFFICIAL SEAL 0 A s : $M$RAAAN S.GASPER NQTApY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMNSStON Na 323409 My Commission Expires: iy 'y/3 2,71-3 MY COMMISSION CORES MAY 13,2003 J • EXILTR1T A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 CITY OFTIGARD EMPIRE BATTERIES sCommunity p tte cm unity 120 DAYS = 7/4/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00002 Land Partition (MLP) MLP2000-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and, therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Empire Batteries, Inc. Engineered Structures 7320 SW Bonita Road 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light-Industrial; I-L. The I-L zoning district provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise, glare, odor, and vibration. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420 REVIEW 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790 CRITERIA: 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Directors designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 1 OF 26 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: SUbmit evidence of complying with the-TO-flowing conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 1. Submit to the Police Department, an outdoor lighting plan for review and approval. 2. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows no above ground utilities or vegetation exceeding 3 feet in height will be located in the vision clearance areas. 3. Prior to any site work, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing adjacent to the required buffer from Ball Creek. 4. Submit a revised plan that shows at least 2 of the parking spaces will be designated as carpool/vanpool spaces. 5. Submit a revised plan that shows all of the ADA spaces will be 9 feet wide, and at least one of the spaces is van accessible, with an 8-foot aisle. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows a sign will be located at the intersection of the access drive into the site and the one-way drive running in front of the existing building that states the drive is one-way/do not enter. 7. Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be provided where the parking abuts landscaping or walkways. 8. Submit a revised parking plan that shows the angle and dimension of parking spaces in front of the existing building. The space and aisle dimensions must be in accordance with Table 18.765.1. 9. Submit a copy of the floor plan for building #1 for staff to confirm that the proposed bicycle parking location is within 50 feet of the entrance. If the location of the bicycle rack is not within 50 feet of the main entrance, the rack must be relocated to meet this requirement. 10. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 11. Submit a copy of a recorded irrevocable shared parking agreement between the two parcels. 12. Submit details of the trash enclosure and refuse container for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. 13. Submit a revised landscape plan that shows landscaping will be provided between the parking lot and all adjacent properties, including the eastern property line. 14. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows all service facilities will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. 15. Submit a revised plan that clearly states the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. 16. Submit evidence of a reciprocal access easement to serve both parcels. 17. Prior to construction, the work area adjacent to the Water Resource Area shall be identified and marked on the site with construction fencing. 18. Prior to any site work, all erosion control measures must be in place and may only be removed after the construction is complete. 19. Submit evidence of DSL and US Army Corps of Engineer approval of storm outfall construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 2 OF 26 20. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the location of L.le wetland adjacent to Ball Creek and that shows the 50-foot buffer from top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. This buffer must be reflected on all sets of plans and no development other than the storm outfall may be located within this buffer without prior approval. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 21. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the proposed taps to the public sanitary sewer and water lines in SW Bonita Road. The permit will also cover any driveway construction work in the right-of-way (ROW) of Bonita Road. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 22. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 23. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. 24. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an ingress/egress easement available from Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC to the east of this site. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact the property owner of Tax Lot 200 and work with them to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with the property owner of Tax Lot 200 to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. 25. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a revised storm drainage plan that indicates they will provide for onsite detention of the additional stormwater runoff from this site, in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards. This plan revision must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department (Brian Rager). 26. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant's proposed water layout plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 27. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 3 OF 26 Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-- I71, ext. 318) for review and approval: 28. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 29. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifiications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is In compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Planning Division (Julia Hajduk, 639-4171, ext. 407) for review and approval: 30. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall construct a fence (split-rail) to prevent employees from inadvertently disturbing the buffer area. 31. All site improvements shall be installed per the approved plan as revised by the conditions of approval. 32. No truck traffic may back into the site from SW Bonita Road to serve the existing or proposed buildings. .THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VAL D;E9R 18 MONTHS FROM THEEFFECTIVE DATE OF is N EC1SNo N: SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records based on the address 7320 SW Bonita and the "Empire Batteries" project name. No previous land use cases were found on file in the City within the current tracking system. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the south side of SW Bonita Road. The site is bordered on the north, east, and west by property zoned Light Industrial (l-L). Ball Creek runs along the southern property line. On the other side of the creek is property zoned Industrial Park (I-P). To the east are railroad tracks. The property on all sides is developed with industrial uses. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site currently has 1 building on site. The existing site has non-conforming landscaping and a non-conforming front yard setback. The proposal involves partitioning the existing building off from and upgrading the landscaping and parking areas. The proposal also provides for the construction of 2 new buildings and associated parking. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek which is identified as a major stream on the City's wetland inventory. The applicant proposes to have a storm water outfall to the creek, therefore, Type II Water Resources Overlay review is required. The outfall will involve less then 10 cubic yards of and alteration, therefore, no sensitive lands review is required. After the construction of the storm water outfall, the applicant has proposed to maintain the required 50-foot buffer (as required because the site is adjacent to Ball Creek, a major stream). The property is located at 7320 SW Bonita; WCTM 2S112AC, tax lot 00300. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 4 OF 26 'SECTION IV. CONAENTS FROM PROPERTY OWi., RS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given the opportunity to provide written comments prior to a decision being made. Staff received one letter from a concerned citizen which is summarized below. Copies of the letter submitted are in the public record and are available for review at the City. A concern was raised related to truck access and the need to block SW Bonita Road in order to access the existing building, as well as, adjacent buildings. The concerned property owner indicates that they have been stopped several times in the middle of the morning in order to have a large truck back in from Bonita Road to service a business that is next door to the east of the subject site. They indicate that, due to the nature of the buildings in the zone, the site should be developed to allow for safe and legal truck access without interrupting normal traffic flows. The concerned property owner requests that the City make certain the applicant has allowed for this access on the property while continuing to provide for the required striped parking and landscaping. Staff Response: The applicant is required to provide loading spaces for the new buildings that will not require backing in from SW Bonita Road. The vehicles must be able to fully maneuver on-site. The site will provide better access for the existing building by providing a mechanism for trucks to go around the building and load from the front. This is addressed further under the off-street parking and loading requirements section of this decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Land Partition 18.420.050 (General Approval Criteria) 18.420.050.4 (Specific Approval Criteria) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.775 Sensitive lands) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resources Overlay) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Land Partion General Approval Criteria Section 18.420.050 contains the following general approval criteria for a Land Partition: A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; Because the proposal involves an existing development, it is important that the partition not create a non-conforming situation on the existing development site. In this case, the proposal must maintain the required parking and landscaping for the existing development. Parcel 2 is NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 5 OF 26 reviewed for compliance voth the Code standards as part of this Site Development Review. The required parking for the existing building is 7 and the required percent of landscaping in the I-L zone is 15%. After the partition, the applicant will continue to have over 7 parking spaces and the percentage of landscaping will be 8.25%. While this landscape percent is less than required by the zone, it is more than is currently provided, thus the improvements will decrease the non-conformity. The parking is discussed in detail further in this decision under the off-street parking and loading requirements. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, and electricity are available to serve the lots. Additional details and requirements for the proposal to comply with City and Washington County standards are provided under SECTION VI — STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS of this decision. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and No improvements are proposed. However, they will meet or will be conditioned to meet, City and applicable agency standards as part of this development further in this decision. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements listed in the next section. The Specific partition requirements are discussed and conditioned, if necessary, further in this decision. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. The details of the access drive and any additional requirements, if necessary, will be addressed further in this decision and conditioned if necessary. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred- year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. While Ball Creek is a major stream, it does not have an identified floodplain adjacent to it. In addition, there are currently no trail studies or trail plans for development along Ball Creek, therefore, a condition to dedicate land for a pathway is not warranted. FINDING: As proposed, all of the Land Partition Approval Criteria have been fully satisfied or will be met as conditioned elsewhere in this decision. Specific Partition Approval Criteria The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The lot width required for the I-P zone is 50 feet. Both parcels will have lot widths in excess of 200 feet, therefore, this standard is satisfied. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. The zone is I-L which does not have a minimum lot area, therefore, this standard does not apply. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. This standard is intended for residential developments. Because this is an industrially zoned site, the parcels must be able to provide for access as required to serve potential development of the parcels. In this case, one 30-foot-wide access drive would be needed to serve developments with up to 100 parking spaces. As discussed further in this NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 6 OF 26 decision, the applicant's proposed access drive meets, or will ue conditioned to meet this requirement. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. The following table lists the dimensional standards in the I-P zone From Table 18.530.2 STANDARD I-L ZONE Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Minimum Lot Size None 30,020 sq. ft 52,584 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. >50 ft >50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 30 ft. Non-conforming N/A [4] - Side facing street on corner & through lots [1] 20 ft. N/A N/A - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 2 ft. min. 0 ft. min. - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3] 4 ft. N/A Maximum Height 45 ft. existing < 20 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 91.75 75.5% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 8.25% 24.5% **see discussion [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance) must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Because the parcel is a flag lot in Industrial zone and the industrial zone setbacks are intended to provide buffer from the street,the front yard setback requirements do not apply to flag lots in this zone. The setbacks for the existing building on Parcel 1 meet the dimensional standards with the exception of the front yard setback which is pre-existing, non-conforming and is not made worse as a result of this partition. While the landscaping is less than required in the base zone, it is more than is currently provided. Because the development will decrease the non-conformity, this is acceptable. In addition, overall, the site will provide the required landscaping. As is demonstrated by the table, the proposed buildings and landscaping on Parcel 2 will comply with the dimensional criteria. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. This standard is intended for residential uses to insure privacy and buffering for both the resident on the flag lot and adjacent lots. Because this is an industrial use, surrounded by industrial uses, which allows 0-foot side and rear yard setbacks, staff has determined that the requirement that side yard setbacks be 10 feet is not applicable. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. The parcels have access to SW Bonita Road. Because this area is zoned Industrial and the driveway is adjacent to properties developed with industrial uses, no screening is necessary along the existing access drive. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. The application has been reviewed by the Building Division for compliance with the fire code. The comments received do not indicate additional hydrants are needed. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 7 OF 26 The applicant has proposed an access which will serve both lots, however, a copy of a recorded document has not been provided. As will be discussed further in this decision, there may be an opportunity to share access via an easement with the property owner to the west. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicant has not fully met the standards because the applicant has not submitted evidence of a reciprocal easement to serve the parcels. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit evidence of a reciprocal access easement to serve both parcels. B. Applicable Development Code Standards The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Development Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 {Planned Developments), 18.715 C(Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) These hapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a walkway will be provided from street to all building entrances. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The plans show the proposed walkway will cross the parking lot in two locations. Both crossings are less than 36 feet in length. The pavement is shown to be striped which will provide a clear distinction of materials. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans do not clearly state that the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 8 OF 26 developments with less than 100 parking spaces is one �.,-foot access with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will have less that 100 parking spaces and has 1 point of access into the parking lot from SW Bonita Road. There is 30 feet from the property line to the edge of the building and the access will provide 24 feet of pavement. The access is within 50 feet of the building entrances. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the access and egress standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that clearly states the walkways will be paved with a hard surface material. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Bonita was widened and recently improved. Street trees were not installed as part of that street improvement and none are proposed as part of this development. Due to the existing conditions along the frontage of the site, however, staff finds that the installation of street trees is not practical. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between a proposed industrial use and existing Industrial uses. The surrounding uses are all permitted uses in the I-L zone. The buffer matrix indicates that when an I-L use abuts an I-L or I-P use, no buffer or screening is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. While the majority of the site is not visible from the street, this standard applies to all parking areas abutting adjacent lots. The plans provided indicate that Zable Cherry Laurel will be planted along the western parking lot. No landscaping has been shown adjacent to the eastern parking. Parking lot landscaping is spaced with one (1) tree for every 7 spaces in all areas. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The applicant's plans do not show service facilities will be screened, therefore, Staff can not determine if the standards have been met. If the applicant submits a revised plan that NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 9 OF 26 clearly shows all service facilities (including vaults and transformers) will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2, Staff can determine that the standards are met. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's narrative indicates the refuse container will be screened by a 6-foot chain link enclosure screened with vinyl slats. The enclosure will not be visible from a public street, public parking lot or other public facility. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows landscaping will be provided between the parking lot and all adjacent properties, including the eastern property line. Submit a revised plan that clearly shows all service facilities will be screened in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.2. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's plans show two trash enclosures will be provided. One 10'x20' enclosure adjacent to the existing building and one 10'x10' enclosure adjacent to building #2. The applicant has obtained the franchise hauler sign-of for the locations and sizes proposed. Because the franchise hauler has accepted the proposed refuse locations, the applicant has met the Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-off option. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The locations proposed are not in a required front yard and are centrally located for all users. The proposed locations are not within any required parking areas. The narrative indicates that the refuse containers will be screened by a solid chain link fence with vinyl slats. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 10 OF 26 Because the waste hauler has signed off on the location, it is a6sumed that the location is accessible to their trucks and meets their locational needs. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit details of the trash enclosure and refuse container for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.7651: Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The plans provide for more than 20 parking spaces, therefore, carpool/vanpool parking is required. The plans do not reserve parking spaces for carpool or vanpool spaces. Based on the number of parking spaces required for the two new buildings (31), 2 spaces must be designated for carpool/vanpool. Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 51 parking spaces over both parcels, therefore, 3 ADA handicap spaces are required, one (1) of which is van accessible (9 feet wide with and 8-foot aisle). The applicant's plans show 3 spaces will be marked as ADA accessible, one adjacent to each building. The spaces adjacent to building #2 and the existing building have an 8-foot aisle but are not 9 feet wide. The space adjacent to building #1 is 9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle, thus meeting the standard. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 11 OF 26 surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residents, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and has been discussed previously in this decision. Vision clearance will be addressed further in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed and conditioned previously in this decision. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The interior drives on parcel 2 are two-way and do not require additional markings, however, the applicant has indicated that the access in front of the existing building on Parcel 1 will be one way. The applicant's plans show the driveway marked one-way, however the plans should be revised to show a sign and clear marking from the access drive into the site that says "do not enter" and clearly indicates that the driveway is one-way out. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans do not show wheel stops will be provided adjacent to landscaping or walkways. In order to meet this standard, the applicant must submit a plan that shows wheel stops will be provided. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans show the majority of parking spaces will be 9 feet by 20 feet. There are several spaces, however, including two of the ADA spaces that scales to only 8 feet in width. While 50% of the non-ADA spaces may be compact, the applicant has not clearly indicated which spaces are proposed for compact parking. The access aisle is greater than 24 feet wide in all areas except along the front of the existing building. The area in the front of the existing building is only one-way and will provide a minimum of 16 feet in width. Based on Table 18.765.1, this does not provide adequate back-up room for parking spaces at a 90 degree angle. In order to provide parking off of this one-way drive, the applicant must revise the parking plan so that the parking in front of the existing building is at an angle of at least 60 degrees. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 12 OF 26 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The plans show a 2 space bicycle rack will be provided near building #2 and a 4 space bicycle rack will be located near building #1. The applicant has not provided a floor plan of building #1 for staff to confirm that the proposed location is within 50 feet of the entrance. The floor plan of building #2 indicates that the proposed location will be within 50 feet of an entrance into the building. A condition is necessary for the applicant to submit plans that show a bicycle rack will be located within 50 feet of the entrance to building #1. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for Light Industrial Uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, therefore, 2 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. The applicant's plan show a 2-space bicycle rack will be provided adjacent to building #2 and a 4-space bicycle rack will be provided adjacent to building #1, therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for Light Industrial Uses is 1.6 spaces per 1000 square feet and there is no maximum. The applicant is, therefore, required to provide 31 parking spaces for the two new buildings. The use of the existing building is warehouse, which requires a minimum of 7 spaces and a maximum of 11. The plans show parcel 1 will have 27 parking spaces, however parcel 2 will have only 24. Combined, the total parking is 51 spaces. Because parcel 1 has more than the maximum and parcel 2 has less than the minimum, a shared parking agreement is needed to insure both parcels meet the parking requirements. The applicant has not specifically proposed a shared parking agreement, however, the design indicates that this was intended. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 13 OF 26 Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The existing building has 2 loading spaces in front of the building. Building #1 is over 10,000 square feet and will have 2 loading spaces. Building #2 is less than 10,000 square feet and is not proposed to have loading spaces. A condition is needed that requires the applicant to insure that no truck traffic will back into the site from Bonita to serve the existing or proposed buildings. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows at least 2 of the parking spaces will be designated as carpool/vanpool spaces. • Submit a revised plan that shows all of the ADA spaces will be 9 feet wide, and at least one of the spaces is van accessible, with an 8-foot aisle. • Submit a revised plan that shows a sign will be located at the intersection of the access drive into the site and the one-way drive running in front of the existing building that states the drive is one-way/do not enter. • Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be provided where the parking abuts landscaping or walkways. • Submit a revised parking plan that shows the angle and dimension of parking spaces in front of the existing building. The space and aisle dimensions must be in accordance with Table 18.765.1. • Submit a copy of the floor plan for building #1 for staff to confirm that the proposed bicycle parking location is within 50 feet of the entrance. If the location of the bicycle rack is not within 50 feet of the main entrance, the rack must be relocated to meet this requirement. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. • Submit a copy of a recorded irrevocable shared parking agreement between the two parcels. • No truck traffic may back into the site from SW Bonita Road to serve the existing or proposed buildings. Sensitive Lands (18.775) Landform alterations or developments which involve less than 10 cubic yards of material are permitted outright. Landform alterations or developments that are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies be obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. There are wetlands and floodplains on-site, however, the applicant has proposed to stay out of the required buffer with the exception of the storm outfall which will involve less than 10 cubic yards of material. Staff will, however, impose a condition that requires permanent NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 14 OF 26 marking of the buffer areas to insure that there is no disturbanG . In addition, the applicant must construct temporary fencing prior to any site work to insure that there is no disturbance of the buffer area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, Staff can determine that there are no sensitive land concerns as a result of this development. CONDITIONS: Prior to any site work, the applicant shall install temporary construction fencing adjacent to the required buffer from Ball Creek. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall construct a fence (split-rail) to prevent employees from inadvertently disturbing the buffer area. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the I-L Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are no trees over 12 inches caliper on the site, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Because there are no trees over 12 inches caliper on the site, this standard does not apply. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The site plans indicate several utilities within the vision clearance area. A site visit confirmed that there are currently no above ground utilities, however the applicant must submit verification that there will be no above ground utilities or vegetation between 3 and 8 feet in height within the vision clearance areas. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Submit a revised landscape plan that shows no above ground utilities or vegetation exceeding 3 feet in height will be located in the vision clearance areas. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 15 OF 26 'Water Resources Overlay (18.797) Section 18.797 identifies Ball Creek as a Major Stream. The required buffer from this creek is 50 feet from the top of bank or wetland edge whichever is greater. An associated wetland is a significant wetland, all or part of which is within 50 feet of any major stream top-of-bank The applicant has proposed a storm water outfall to Ball Creek. This outfall will be within the water resources buffer. The applicant has indicated that they feel this use most closely relates to "irrigation pumps" in relation to impact, however, there is clearly a category of "underground utility" which most closely fits the use proposed. The applicant has provided an addendum narrative dated May 3, 2000 that addresses the standards of Section 18.797.080. The applicant's plan shows the required 50-foot buffer from top of bank, but the plan does not show the location of a small wetland on-site. Based on the information on the wetland report, staff has determined that this wetland is an associated wetland and, therefore, the buffer must be from the top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. A condition is being imposed that will require the applicant to accurately show the location of this wetland. It appears, however, that the revised location of the buffer will not significantly impact the location of the water quality facility. Extension of under ground utilities within the water resources buffer is a Type II use which must address the following standards: Alternatives considered: Except for stream corridor enhancement, most Type II and III uses are expected to develop outside of water resource and riparian setback areas. Therefore, Type II and III development applications must carefully examine upland alternatives for the proposed use, and explain the reasons why the proposed development cannot reasonably occur outside of the water resource or riparian setback area. The applicant's narrative indicates that the site topography and the topography of the drainage basin required the storm water run-off to be directed to the south of the site into Ball Creek. The Ball Creek culvert under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks is the only gravity fed drainage option available. The proposed storm water outfall pipe is necessary to convey storm water from the water quality facility to Ball Creek. While an open channel is an alternative, it would also require ground disturbance and would have a greater potential for erosion. The option chosen is the only option that meets the need with minimal impact and erosion. Minimize siting impacts: The proposed use shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and adverse hydrological impacts on water resources. For Type 11 and III uses, the Civil Engineer, with experience in water quality, must certify that any adverse water quality impacts of the development proposal will be minimized, consistent with best management practices. For all uses, the development shall be located as far from the water resource, and use as little of the water resource or riparian setback area, as possible, recognizing the operational needs of the proposed development. The applicant's Engineer, Kim McMillan, P.E. has designed the stormwater facility and the related outfall to specifically minimize erosion and impacts during construction. The only work in the riparian zone is the 8" outfall. In order to avoid potential erosion, the outfall energy dissipation area must be located near the creek within the riparian zone. Construction materials and methods: Where development within the riparian area is unavoidable, construction materials or methods used within the riparian setback area shall minimize damage to water quality and native vegetation. The applicant's narrative states that the work will be completed with a track hoe and 2' wide bucket. The track hoe will remain more than 10 feet from the edge of Ball Creek and extend the bucket to complete the required work. The work is anticipated to be completed within one day. The applicant has indicated all required erosion control measures will be in place prior to and throughout construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 16 OF 26 Minimize flood damage: Aboveground residential structures shall not be permitted within the WR Overlay district, where such land is also within the 100-year floodplain. On-site flood storage capacity shall not decrease as a result of development. The cumulative effects of any proposed development shall not reduce flood storage capacity or raise base flood elevations on- or off-site. Any new commercial or industrial land development proposed within the 100-year floodplain shall be designed consistent with Chapter 18.775, Sensitive Lands. No residential structures are proposed. Avoid steep slopes: Within 50 feet of any water resource, excavation and vegetation removal shall be avoided on slopes of 25% or greater and in areas with high erosion potential (as shown on SCS maps), except where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. The work area within the riparian zone does not involve any slopes that exceed 25%. Minimize impacts on existing vegetation: The following standards shall apply when construction activity is proposed in areas where vegetation is to be preserved. Temporary measures used for initial erosion control shall not be left in place permanently; Work areas on the immediate site shall be carefully identified and marked to reduce potential damage to trees and vegetation; Trees shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing working equipment. During clearing operations, trees and vegetation shall not be permitted to fall or be placed outside the work area; In areas designated for selective cutting or clearing, care in falling and removing trees and brush shall be taken to avoid injuring trees and shrubs to be left in place; Stockpiling of soil, or soil mixed with vegetation, shall not be permitted on a permanent basis. The applicant has stated that all temporary erosion control devices will be removed once the native grasses have been re-established. The applicant has indicated that prior to construction, the work areas will be carefully identified and marked to reduce potential damage to trees and vegetation. A condition to this affect will be required. The applicant has stated that no trees will be used for anchoring or stabilizing equipment and that trees will not be permitted to fall or be placed outside of the work area. The condition to clearly mark the work area will help to insure this standard is met. The project does not involve selective cutting as there are no trees in the area of the resource area. The applicant states there may be temporary stockpiling of material, however, soil will not be stockpiled after the ditch is backfilled. Vegetation mitigation plan: If a Type II or III use is proposed within a water resource site or riparian setback area, or mitigation is proposed as a method to reduce the riparian setback in accordance with Section 18.797.100, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented. The applicant shall be responsible for re-vegetating areas temporarily disturbed by excavation on a 1:1 basis; Where approval is granted to reduce the riparian setback area, the applicant shall be responsible for mitigating for the reduced setback by replacing non-native vegetation within the remaining, protected riparian setback area on a 1.5:1 basis. That is, for each 100 square feet of riparian setback that is lost to development, at least 150 square feet of existing disturbed area within the riparian setback or wetland shall be re-planted with native plant species; The re- vegetation plan shall provide for the replanting and maintenance of native plant species designed to achieve pre-disturbance conditions. The applicant shall be responsible for replacing any native plant species that do not survive the first two years after planting, and for ensuring the survival of any replacement plants for an additional two years after their replacement. The proposal does not request a reduction in the riparian setback area; therefore, this standard does not apply. The applicant has stated in the narrative that native grasses will be re-seeded and will be monitored for two years. Any areas which are not re-vegetated during that period will be re-planted. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 17 OF 26 Water and sewer infiltration and discharge: Water and sanitary sewer facilities shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid infiltration of floodwaters into the system, and to avoid discharges from such facilities to streams and wetlands. The proposed work in the riparian zone does not include any water or sanitary sewer facilities, therefore, this standard does not apply. On-site systems: On-site septic systems and private wells shall be prohibited within the WR Overlay district. No septic systems or private wells are proposed. Erosion control plan: If a Type II or III use is proposed within a water resource site or riparian setback area, the erosion control standards of 18.797.080.J shall apply within the WR Overlay and be adhered to. The applicant's narrative indicates that the erosion control standards of 18.797.080.J will be followed. A condition will be attached requiring the erosion control measures be in place prior to construction and removed only after construction has been completed. The condition to clearly mark the construction area will insure that this is further satisfied. This approval is based on the applicant acknowledging the above standards will be adhered to. Plan implementation: A schedule of planned erosion control and re-vegetation measures shall be provided which sets forth the progress of construction activities, and mitigating erosion control measures. An approved Erosion Control of Re-vegetation Plan shall be implemented and maintained as follows: Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to any stripping or excavation work: The applicant shall implement the measures and construct facilities contained in the approved Erosion Control Plan in a timely manner. During active construction, the applicant shall inspect erosion control measures daily, and maintain, adjust, repair or replace erosion control measures to ensure that they are functioning properly; Eroded sediment shall be removed immediately from pavement surfaces, off-site areas, and from the surface water management system, including storm drainage inlets, ditches and culverts; Water containing sediment shall not be flushed into the surface water management system, wetlands or streams without first passing through an approved sediment filtering facility or device; In addition, the applicant shall call for City inspection, prior to the foundation inspection for any building, to certify that erosion control measures are installed in accordance with the erosion control plan. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan that will insure the standards are met. The applicant has indicated that erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained throughout the project. They have also states that all sediment will be contained to the work area or promptly removed from other areas and that sediments will not be flushed in to the surface water management systems, wetlands or stream. A condition will be required that all erosion control measures be in place prior to beginning construction. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Water Resources Overlay standards are not fully met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Prior to construction, the work area adjacent to the Water Resource Area shall be identified and marked on the site with construction fencing. Prior to any site work, all erosion control measures must be in place and may only be removed after the construction is complete. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 18 OF 26 • Submit evidence of DSL and US Army Corps of Engineer approval of storm outfall construction. • Submit a revised plan that clearly shows the location of the wetland adjacent to Ball Creek and that shows the 50-foot buffer from top of bank or wetland edge, whichever is greater. This buffer must be reflected on all sets of plans and no development other than the storm outfall may be located within this buffer without prior approval. Note: The applicant, by submitting a proposal to comply with these standards, accepts responsibility in insuring that the proposed methods are utilized during construction. If construction activities do not comply with the standards specified, the applicant is responsible. C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the rovisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the building and all site improvements outside of the buffer area. There are no trees on the site. There are no known areas subject to sliding. Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division, however, they have indicated that the plans satisfy the fire code requirements for hydrant location. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 19 OF 26 and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be place.. at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and requested that the applicant submit a lighting plan for review and approval. FINDING: Because information from the Police Department indicates that a lighting plan is needed in order to verify that the lighting meets the crime prevention and safety criteria, this standard has not been satisfied. If the applicant provides a lighting plan to the Police Department for review and approval, this standard will be met. CONDITION: Submit to the Police Department, an outdoor lighting plan for review and approval. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Bonita and is less then 1/4 mile from SW 72nd Avenue which is a Tri-met transit route. Staff sent a request for comments to Tri-met, however, they did not respond with a request for the applicant to provide additional transit facilities along the frontage. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of pa pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. While Ball Creek is a major stream, it does not have an identified floodplain adjacent to it. In addition, there are currently no trail studies or trail plans for development along Ball Creek, therefore, a condition to dedicate land for a pathway is not warranted. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings as part of a light industrial park. The zone is I-L, which allows light industrial uses in this zone. It is the applicant's burden to insure that all prospective tenants fall within the use classifications for light industrial zones. Dimensional Requirements: The table identified previously in this decision compared the dimensional requirements with the proposed improvements. Based on the information provided and discussed in that table, staff has determined that the underlying dimensional standards have been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above and elsewhere in this decision, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 20 OF 26 A. Street And Utility Improvement Standards (18.810) Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as TDCrtion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a major collector street to have a 60 to 80-foot right-of-way width and a 44-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Bonita Road, which is classified as a major collector on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway was improved in recent years by the City. No further ROW dedications or street improvements are necessary, with the exception of street trees. There are no street trees along the frontage of this site. However, due to the existing conditions along the frontage, installation of street trees is not practical. There is an existing driveway on SW Bonita Road that serves the existing building on Parcel 1. The applicant's plan indicates that they plan to close the existing driveway and construct a new one at the eastern boundary of the site. This new driveway would serve both Parcels 1 and 2. The property owner to the east, Mr. John Skourtes, who owns Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC, contacted the City regarding access into the subject site. Mr. Skourtes informed Staff that he had previously granted the owner of this parcel an ingress/egress easement over their existing driveway abutting their western boundary. This would make sense to Staff because SW Bonita Road is a very busy major collector street, and consolidation of driveways is preferable to improve traffic flow and prevent interruptions. Staff was not able to confirm the existence of an official easement, but Mr. Skourtes indicated that such an easement does exist. In light of this, Staff finds that the applicant must explore this issue further prior to issuance of the site permit. The applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an easement available to them. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact Mr. Skourtes and work with him to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with Mr. Skourtes to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing concrete sidewalk along the frontage of this site. No further improvements are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 21 OF 26 There is an existing 10-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Bonita Road adjacent to this site. The applicant s plan indicates that they will tap the main line to bring a 4-inch lateral into the site to serve the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant's plan appears to accommodate any upstream flows that pass through this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is required for this project. The applicant's plans do not clearly reflect if they have addressed this issue. Therefore, the applicant will need to revise their plan to provide for onsite detention. It appears the applicant could easily meet this standard. The applicant's plan indicates that they must construct an outfall pipe from their water quality facility down to Ball Creek at the south end of the site. According the applicant's engineer, the amount of disturbance within the 50-foot riparian setback will be less than 10 cubic yards. Therefore, no Sensitive Lands approval is required. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall Include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. As stated previously, there are no trails planned within this area, therefore, this standard does not apply Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 22 OF 26 temporary utility servic,.. facilities during construction, h. ,1i capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are no overhead utility lines that need to be addressed. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: A thorough review of fire and life safety will be conducted by the Building Division and TVFR during the building permit review phase. Public Water System: There is an existing public water line located in SW Bonita Road that presently serves this site. The applicants plan indicates that the main line will be tapped to rovide new domestic and fire service for the proposed buildings on Parcel 2. The Public Works Department shall review and approve of the final water system layout for this site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates that an extended dry detention pond will be placed at the southeast corner of the site to treat the onsite runof. Staff reviewed the preliminary sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer and finds that the proposed pond should adequately treat the onsite runoff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 23 OF 26 ' completion of the construL,dion. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit(s). For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning suite numbers for the tenant spaces and the property managers or owners are responsible for keeping the City updated as to any changes in suite layouts. This information must then be given to the City so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so City Staff can assign suite numbers. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. B. Impact Study (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan I I/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $25,787 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $80,584 ($25,787 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 24 OF 26 impact of this project on Lne transportation system is $54,79 . The applicant will not be required to construct any off-site improvements. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1. Building #1 — South wall shall be one-hour construction. 2. Building #1 — where proposed tir storage exceeds 6'0", the requirements of UFC Article 81 will apply. 3. Railroad — the site must comply with ODOT rules set out in OAR, Chapter 74, division 300 through 355. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and requested a lighting plan be submitted for their review and approval. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: Public Water Improvements (6-inch fire line and meters) to be approved through public works. Water meters to be in landscaped areas only. Meter locations to be a minimum 15'0" from driveway. All water meters (existing and new) shall have a minimum of reduced pressure principle device (backflow) assembly installed directly behind the meter (customer side). Backflow protection for the fire line shall be in the form of double detector check valve assembly in a vault. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has not provided comments or objections. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the body of this decision with the following exception: "Mr. Schott's wetland analysis indicates the existence of an emergent wetland on the site. The wetland and it's required vegetated corridor must be shown on the construction plans. Construction plans must provide a detailed vegetated corridor restoration plan, in accordance with the requirements of R&O 99-44". Union Pacific Railroad has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: "No additional drainage will be allowed toward our right-of-way and tracks." US Army Corps of Engineers has reviewed the proposal and indicated that a Corps permit will be required for the storm water outfall if there is a discharge of fill material. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODF&W) had the opportunity to review the proposal and provided comments which are summarized below: Comments focused on the width of the riparian area necessary to provide functional fish and wildlife habitat and storm water issues. ODF&W recommends that the width of the buffer be increased to 100 feet. This recommended buffer width is based on research that says the buffer should be 2x the height of potential trees on-site. Ball creek is managed as a fish-bearing stream. Appropriate storm water detention and treatment facilities are recommended to treat impervious area. These facilities should not encroach into the riparian buffer setback. Staff Response: Staff can not currently require a larger buffer than that required by the development code. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 25 OF 26 • AT&T, TCI Cable, PGE, GTE, US West, DSL, Tri-met anu 1 W Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MAY 4, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON MAY 19, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AAp eal:� The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 3:30 PM ON MAY18, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. ✓C.: May 4, 2000 PREPARE/jive,/ Julia Powell Hajduk DATE Associate Planner `.I May 4, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. B- ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\julia\sdr\Empire Batteries.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002-EMPIRE BATTERIES PAGE 26 OF 26 a A i i i " 1 . • 0am%f" •g ' i 4 ..sa er 0 M4 �� ! V 1 i .l i- - p °,I _ ® lp�'y� oS Itto mil. ; =I _ . ,, .- zAN ; • \ Aill ALL t i ` I o `vy ` .' OW CO R so 1. ho' 9NIrri1 ('1} 'bS OZO B�) I' :�: Z Z c / %� s• 111111100, .mot /� % (.4 is tirtS) �, ". �._,....--- 146,w . ,z toi "7 pa .%----- ..."..‘ ,--413S0dOild ,,.....41 ,4-..,...,, ' F: 75 1■.) \ --\ \ .. . ma .cs Lis I_•_4" 0 ___... EtT.7 ki. skei.vL•eff — =Mammon 1'° - i 7.77771111--1111,,,. . . —--N — n.a.,. r v zr.:a I It N a — 1 , 0 ;$ 0 li 0 is O 1 0 0 0 N CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 0> l I I CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM /I Mk VICINITY MAP-----�� IL. 10'0 ,mot ,►m��, MUM SDR2000-00002 �r ; - MLP2000-00002•� / cap � 3 Fvy all - EMPIRE ._ III, ________________�� R BATTERIES, INC. illiiIiall �,p B SUBJECT 'n ow ""• SITE — eQ • I f Bo"RD Liii /- H $, a 1 m P. o o • 71 < N m 0 a I CARDINAL LN 0 400 800 Feet _ 1'=595 feel 11111 r Z ■ .a1 I REDWOODLN City O a = �QJ ' ty Tigard :': , ,,,, ,,, Information on this map is for general location only and '1 —111111 :�,,,,,.. / - • should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd " �.,,,,,,,W Tigard, 9 _/ /ww(5031E39-0171 gard. .! / mW.Uwvw.cl.ugard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Mar 9,2000;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR John Boutinen Engineered Structures EMPIRE BATTERIES INC. 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 SDR2000-00002 Tigard, OR 97223 Empire Batteries, Inc. 7320 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97223 Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 John R. Skourtes National Safety Co., Inc. 17010 SW Weir Road Beaverton OR 97007 John C. Wiitala Wiitala Property Management Co. 15350 SW Sequoia Parkway, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97224 Jim Grimes Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 2501 SW First Avenue PO Box 59 Portland OR 97207 Clifford C. Cabe, Construction Engineer 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Portland, OR 97232 ' A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I: CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development • Shaping (Better Community STAlef,of ockEGo. ■ ) County o 'Washington )ss. City of igard ) I, Patricia L. Gunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Chad(Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2000-00002/MLP2000-00002 - EMPIRE BATTERIES. INC. AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) I City of Tigard Planning Director IT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:, I AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) I City of Tigard Planning Director • Tigard Hearings Officer • Tigard Planning Commission ▪ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: ,T,[ye.K,J cf Nc;ce, FOR: (File No Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, m e hibit "A", was mail-d to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B" on March 9,200 I and •-•• i.'d in t - United States Mail on March 9,2000, postage prepaid., , ,„..„ _. (Person t at -epareiNo Subscribed and sworn/affirmed befo - me on the / day of.1,— _, 2000. `HO �II�� OFFICIAL FJ1L My Commission Expires: '.�iG /3�CJhZ3 SHER AAK s CAgPER `�;;", NOTARZ pUB11C-OREGON my COMMISSION IXP RES�MAY 132003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEN1. _—DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXIT I a. THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION , SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community 500-FOOT PROPERTY OWNER NOTICE DATE OF NOTICE: March 9, 2000 FILE NO. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00002 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2000-00002 FILE NAME: EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MARCH 23, 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address .e relevant approval criteria with s cient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." MINduzimuliiimm VICINITY MAP SDR2000-00002 uu ► 111_ MLP2000-00002 ®® EMPIRE � .•,..• lin SUBJECT BATTERIES, INC. 1 AM- � • a ailw,„ TE _ ririnu1' _ • N. ■ = N ANN • � i s .�.� lip 1116.1 i �� r M rin eon ■� , ...�._.................. oramorrowaservispurenamesra IN1 MN OM EidEllill‘I I auIli■■11wr + sperm -a (6, if a) EXHIBIT B 2S112AA-00500 2 2AB-00800 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP FOUG • • •ANY INC 4380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 PO BO 375• PORTLAND, OR 97201 TI RD,OR 97223 2S112AB-00900 2S112AB-01000 FOUGHT AND COMPANY INC. BIG T INVESTMENTS PO BOX 23759 2314 SE PARKCREST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98684 2S112AB-01100 2S112AB-01200 PIKE RICHARD G TRUSTEE TENNANT INVESTORS 7235 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 1658 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112AB-01300 2S112AB-01600 BONITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP 7333 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 324 PORTLAND,OR 97223 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112AB-01700 2S1 AB-01900 TI ••D CI OF TRI-00 b 0USTRIAL 13125 :' ALL 2106 - •C : O ST TI •RD, OR - 223 MJ UKIE,OR 97222 2S112AB-01901 2-112AB-02000 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL TRI- 'UN• DUSTRIAL 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 ' .CHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKI , •R 97222 2S112AC-00100 2S112AC-00101 WHITLATCH PHYLLIS IRENE TRUSTEE UNION CENTRAL LIFE 14529 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 888 TIGARD,OR 97224 CINCINNATI,OH 45240 2S 112AC-00200 2S 112AC-00300 NATIONAL SAFETY CO MOORE ROD A ET AL 17010 SW WEIR RD do EMPIRE BATTERIES INC BEAVERTON, OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112AC-00400 2S112AC-00500 NATIONAL SAFETY CO SKOURTES JOHN R 14480 YORBA 17010 SW WEIR ROAD CHINO, CA 91710 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-00600 112AC-00711 BHK PROPERTIES LLC BH• •R5• RTIES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 142:! ' 72ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 - ARD, •` 97224 2S 112AC-00800 2S112AC-00801 BH "OP • IES LLC Tf • 'D CI SF 14280 : 2ND AVE 13125 `1 HALL T 'ARD,OR '7224 T :•RD,O' '7223 2S112AC-00900 2S 2AC-01000 KNHS DEVELOPMENT CO PACIF • 'Es ASSOCIATES 26262 S MERIDIAN RD 153 • • • •UOIA PKWY#300-WMI AURORA,OR 97002 'ORTLAND,OR "7224 2 S 112AC-01100 2S112AC-0120s PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES KN' SE OPMENT CO 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 2626 ; M DIAN RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 ;i ORA,OR 97002 112AC-01500 2S112AC-02100 PA IC R • ASSOCIATES CHAMBERLAIN-HUSSA PROPERTIES 153 0 SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 18755 SW TETON "'•RTLAND, :' 97224 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02200 2S112AC-02300 CROMBIE ALLEN P C&C DEVELOPMENT 632 CHARMAN ST PO BOX 4010 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 112AC-02400 2S 112AC-02500 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14725 SW 72ND 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH TIGARD,OR 97224 OMAHA, NE 68102 2S 112AD-00500 112AD-0050 UNION CENTRAL LIFE UNION . RAL LIFE PO BOX 888 PO :i 88: CINCINNATI,OH 45240 • NCINNATI,OH 45240 2S 112AD-00600 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC 1876 BY PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT MIAMI, FL 33102 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED_ ON THIS MAP! I CITY of TIGARD \ ,tee GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM \ i AREA NOTIFIED SUBiE u, (S00') SITE \ a zc antaeotooB ''� for: John Boutinen Re: 2S 112AC, 00300 \ 2S11IAa00900 _ -- M12110 019 0 0 \ 2511211001300 251120001200 2511261100500 IS11211081w1 M1211801000 251120801600 j \ YS112a801100 .201176001100 _ -, \ -- 1—..: I:..., I � .: _ BONITA RD _ , r ---) ",; ), �'� --- 2571211600100 amwwwo 6���iii �� A 26712ac00101 I tsntaecotw r` . 200211001004 t jl t . �\ ' 1 761128000500 ' 1 r 9$IU*ce mewl 2$T1211000000 \ 'stone* j' lllj .'..- 2511211602900 ; ,rtI 751176600900 20122*601000 251120000600 I rn Tj124 02 A 2S770112040000 257 '� 1 2S112ac01200 1 � f 201121160220 f I __..1%> L:... _..... \ 2$1121102100 I ` Mi 111111 \-- . 0 100 200 300 400 fiat osm 1"=317 feet 291106601500 \ ' 1 CARDINAL LN City of Tigard\A-- Information on this map is for general location only and gated be verified with the Development Services Division. ■ 13125 SW Hall Blvd I Tigard,OR 97223 I • ► (503)039-4171 htlp fhwev ci.tigard.on us ■ Community Development Plot date:Jan 19, 2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR ( p,,, rotes ) 2S112AA-00500 2 • 2AB-00800 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP FOUG • 'ANY INC -1380 SW MACADAM AVE STE 100 PO BS 375• PORTLAND, OR 97201 Tea RD,OR 97223 2S112AB-00900 2S112AB-01000 FOUGHT AND COMPANY INC. BIG T INVESTMENTS PO BOX 23759 2314 SE PARKCREST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,WA 98684 2S112AB-01100 2S112AB-01200 PIKE RICHARD G TRUSTEE TENNANT INVESTORS 7235 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 1658 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112AB-01300 2S112AB-01600 BONITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP 7333 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 324 PORTLAND, OR 97223 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112AB-01700 2S1 AB-01900 TI • •D CI OF TRI-C S.•T •I USTRIAL 13125 :t ALL 2106 • •C : 0 ST TI t•RD,OR - 223 i AUKIE,OR 97222 2S 112AB-01901 2.112AB-02000 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL TRI- •UN DUSTRIAL 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 " .CHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKI , SR 97222 2S112AC-00100 2S112AC-00101 WHITLATCH PHYLLIS IRENE TRUSTEE UNION CENTRAL LIFE 14529 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 888 TIGARD,OR 97224 CINCINNATI,OH 45240 2S112AC-00200 2S112AC-00300 NATIONAL SAFETY CO MOORE ROD A ET AL 17010 SW WEIR RD do EMPIRE BATTERIES INC BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S112AC-00400 2S112AC-00500 NATIONAL SAFETY CO SKOURTES JOHN R 14480 YORBA 17010 SW WEIR ROAD CHINO,CA 91710 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-00600 112AC-007u BHK PROPERTIES LLC BH• 'R•• RTIES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 142;• • 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 - ARD, • •7224 • 2S112AC-00800 2S112AC-00801 BH "OP ' IES LLC T D CIT F t428' :'• 2ND AVE 13125 HALL T 'ARD,OR '7224 T RD,0 7223 2S112AC-00900 2S 2AC-01000 KNHS DEVELOPMENT CO PACIF • 'Ee ASSOCIATES 26262 S MERIDIAN RD 153 0 ' •UOIA PKWY#300-WMI AURORA,OR 97002 'ORTLAND,OR "7224 2S112AC-01100 2S112AC-012Q1 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES KN' •E OPMENT CO 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 2626 M ' 'IAN RD PORTLAND, OR 97224 ;•'ORA,OR 97002 112AC-01500 2S112AC-02100 PA IC R • ASSOCIATES CHAMBERLAIN-HUSSA PROPERTIES 153 0 SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 18755 SW TETON ,•RTLAND, 97224 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02200 2S112AC-02300 CROMBIE ALLEN P C&C DEVELOPMENT 632 CHARMAN ST PO BOX 4010 OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02400 2S112AC-02500 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14725 SW 72ND 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH TIGARD,OR 97224 OMAHA,NE 68102 2S112AD-00500 112AD-0050 UNION CENTRAL LIFE UNION •• RAL LIFE PO BOX 888 PO :4 88: CINCINNATI,OH 45240 ,' NCINNATI,OH 45240 2S 112AD-00600 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC 1876 BY PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT MIAMI, FL 33102 APPLICANT MATERIALS LAND PARTITION„,41 TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: y /'4c Property Address/Location(s): Z.c .54) ..•41 FOR STAFF USE ONLY 136,r,cv OreCj°'v SDR 01 -aY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2 s I 1 2.A G 00)300 mil 0,-ox-- Case No.(s): /40p ZD�- 0°00 2_ Site Size: 9© GC74 -a, Other Case No.(s): 51)2 Z7D 2_ Receipt No.: , - .342./2/ Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: A.crt r - 1 -r gy,z 44,e, Application Accepted By: J rte Address: 732-.0 SW "'hone: Date: "ig 'Zoa City: 5 y .� 0d- Zip: 9 780.7) Applicant*: jqj t Eaorl,t„.).e.prj,Sly-cdcAate E - Determined To Be Complete: Address: 73GQ SUJ Kc Phone: %7E-; ?f 6 Zt Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: <,, r-� zip: 722,3 * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Recording Date and Number: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written Rev11/26/98 i:\curpin\mastersUandpart.doc authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission to REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS allow a Land Partition to: divide Cr 0, into 2 V Application Elements Submitted: (total area) (#of parcels) Application Form containing • 4 P t =.nd 5a,554, 5�. Owner's Signature/Written Authorization (sq. . or acres) (sq. ft. or or acres) I Title Transfer Instrument or Deed 0 Site/Plot Plan 2c (provide any additional information here) (#of copies based on pre-app check list) 17 Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") FA Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) (p 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes Fel Filing Fee $780.00 x 26k=X15(0, 3DR 1 List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this /..4/ day of `viet4'1 t &✓'� , Cr rovi 0/'er's S"%nature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ' TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: A•rk.. PcL DATE OF PRE-APP.: a/rT Property Address/Location(s): 2-0 5 -. ± I FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2 S 12 Ac. 3G© Case No.(s): >j7R 2000-CV Oct Other Case No.(s): /1/4/92 10o0-O OOo2 Site Size: Receipt No.: 7'-3z z4 Z_ n Application Accepted By: .1-17-7 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: V I Ge`6r 1.314- r, � Date: g-2-0 J 0 Address: Q, go, 2347 2 Phone: City: ( f 3cta_c( t ,i e&) Zip: Cl 7 Z�3 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Jo�,a c. UP,A.)-gArle JCrretSStnu .f , J Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 7 �D Sto , Q Phone: / —3I1S City: T.y,r-4. Zip: q 7 2_2-3 CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev. 11/26/98 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY Application Form A 0 Owner's Signature/Written Authorization d The owners of record of the subject property request Site 0 Title Transfer Instrument or Deed J Development Review proval to allp(please be specific): CC.[�, Site/Plot Plan JiJ S fi ow-) O �Z� j (#of copies based on pre-app check list) 1(A, t L/..7 S 1^e(4 - S e, V Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") /M prO V Pd1.�, �j - m Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Construction C l a. _ b An" . . ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card- C�� ���� s! (Distributed/completed at application submittal) 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped 4 I ''0 a Legal Size Envelopes • • 04. 0 Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999)....$1,600.00-V ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 • List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Z.oakQ ��--��—toy — 1 . p 2T APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 7 day of 'Jai'?C./ !/ , -pry 111 iir�'1 f ner's S;'nature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 • Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:03/03/2000 15:34 User:front Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0000442 Date: 03/03/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 149.00 Name: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES INC Cash: 0.00 Address: 7360 SW HUNZIKER ST Check: 149.00 SUITE 101 N/A : 0.00 TIGARD, OR 97223 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 149.00 'C * / 2- 110 CITY OF TIGARD Community Development ShapingA Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION J 120 DAYS = 7/4/2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR] 2000-00002 MINOR LAND PARTITION [MLPI 2000-00002 FILE TITLE: EMPIRE BATTERIES,INC. APPLICANT: John Boutinen OWNER: Empire Batteries, Inc. Engineered Structures 7320 SW Bonita Road 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct two new buildings of 3,766 and 15,400 square feet with associated site improvements. The site is adjacent to Ball Creek and therefore, requires Water Resources overlay approval for storm water outfall into the creek. No sensitive lands review is required because the alteration necessary to install the outfall pipe is less than 10 cubic yards. The applicant is also requesting a land partition to separate the existing structure from the back portion of the lot. The partition will result in one 52,584 square foot parcel and one 38,020 square foot parcel. LOCATION: 7320 SW Bonita Road; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: Light Industrial; I-L. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.420, 18.530, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: 3/9/2000 DUE: 3/23/2000 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: [Tentatively) April 21,2000 - ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 Cl CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION p VICINITY MAP p NARRATIVE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY p ARCHITECTUAL PLAN p SITE PLAN p LANDSCAPE PLAN GEO-TECH REPORT WETLAND REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 407 SDR2000-00004 FOUNDRY INDUSTRIAL PARK LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: Ef' (2 FOR Date: 2,1e)(lao LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS o ❑ COMPLETE E INCOMPLETE Existing and proposed contours shown? Er Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? El Yes El No Er Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES [r Right-of-way clearly shown? ©- Centerline of street clearly shown? Name of street(s)shown? Er Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? `'11" Profiles of proposed streets Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? CI Traffic study required/submitted? Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? DCheck widths proposed on public streets A Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ElOther: • SANITARY SEWER ISSUES E21 Existing/proposed lines? EH' Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES _ Existing/proposed lines? Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES `°` �� ss.�r �M A Existing/proposed lines? °sF4`'� ° `� -TR4c,�/LS ;� Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? t,�rt L1 ater quality facility shown on plan? �� '�`�' tn� s does area provided match calculations for size requireme ° -0\1",- Stubs to adjacent properties required? afd Er Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? tbt►�!(,l "- S-r,,4+•1 l� �i co+-�FftES 4 i:\eng\brianr\masters\public facility plan checklist.doc e 2:0J t p f) Pte^) I s Nor ,app GsF 1°(.■ca.4 K February 10, 2000 real* John Boutinen CITY OF TIGARD 7360 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97223 OREGON RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal Empire Batteries Site Development Review (SDR) 2000-00002 Dear Mr. Boutinen: The City has received your application materials for the above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the application materials and determined that additional information is needed before staff can begin review of the application. The following information is needed: • Provide 4 more copies of the wetland report. • Provide 4 more copies of narrative. Only 16 copies of the narrative were submitted. • Provide a complete copy of the deed. The deed submitted appears to be missing page 1. • Provide preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility. • Submit Type II Water Resources Overlay and Sensitive Lands Review applications for storm out-fall work in the creek. Because the plans show storm out-fall to Ball Creek and work within Ball Creek, additional fees and narratives are necessary in order to process this application. The fee is normally $745 each, however, because this is in conjunction with another application, the fee is 20% of the regular fee. You will need to pay an additional $149 for each application for a total of $298. • Submit 20 full-sized plans. The plans submitted are very difficult to read which leads to longer review time by agencies and staff, and a potential of overlooking pertinent information showing compliance with the development code standards. Once the required information is submitted, staff will deem the application complete and schedule the project for a new review. Please be aware that the new Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards will take effect on this project if it is not deemed complete prior to March 15, 2000. Because this site involves a wetland and is located near Ball Creek, the new USA standards could effect your project if they are applied to the site. If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, lia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpin\Julia\sdr\empire batteries acc.doc c: Victor and Judy Shoepe, PO Box 23962, Tigard, OR 97281 SDR 2000-00002 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 02/14/2000 10:46 503-624-9259 EMPIRE BATTERY PAGE 02 Le*e^ S February 10, 2000 John Boutinen CITY OF TIGARD 7360 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97223 OREGON RE: Notice QS incomplete Application Submittal Empire Batteries Site jevejopment Review (SDR) 2000-000Q2 Dear Mr. Boutinen: The City has received your application materials for the above referenced project. Staff has reviewed the application materials and determined that additional information is needed before staff can begin review of the application. The following information is needed: ___ T -1 • Provide 4 more copies of the wetland report. �J( Provide 4 more copies of narrative. Only 16 copies of the narrative were 20 a. submitted. A..--- I /. Provide a complete copy of the deed. The deed submitted appears to be missing _ � page 1. • Provide preliminary sizing calculations for the water quality facility. -,ir • Submit Type II Water Resources Overlay and Sensitive Lands Review 5baej applications for storm out-fall work in the creek. Because the plans show storm a out-fall to Ball Creek and work within Ball Creek, additional fees and narratives are • (5;(23% •°Q necessary in order to process this application. The fee is normally $745 each, —f- however, because this is in conjunction with another application, the fee is 20% of C4 I - I '`� the regular fe . You will need to pay an ddition /4149 or ar�acch applica4'onifor a ,t, Cue total of •� /F. 77S ' s w� —o,, "t pr• • Submit full-sized plans. The plans submitted are very difficult to read which AttcLa. leads to longer review time by agencies and staff, and a potential of overlooking pertinent information showing compliance with the development code standards. Once the required information is submitted, staff will deem the application complete and schedule the project for a new review. Please be aware that the new Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards will take effect on this project if it is not deemed complete pnor to March 15, 2000. Because this site involves a wetland and is located near Ball Creek, the new USA standards could effect your project if they are applied to the site, If you have any questions concerning this information, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, a. is Powell Hajduk Associate Planner I:kxuplmiuliatsdnemplre batteries aoc.doc c: Victor and Judy Shoepe, PO Box 23962, Tigard, OR 97281 SDR 2000-00002 Land use file 13125 SW Hail Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 .4i:A March 8, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON John Boutinen 7360 SW Bonita Road Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal Empire Batteries Site Development Review (SDR) 2000-00002 Land Partition (MLP) 2000-00002 Dear Mr. Boutinen: The City has received the additional information listed as missing in our incompleteness letter dated 2-10-2000. Staff has reviewed this additional information and has determined that your application is complete as of March 7. 2000. The project has been scheduled for review. Staff has set a target decision date for April 27, 2000 for this project. Please be aware that this is a target date for project scheduling only and that the actual date the decision is rendered may be before or after this date. Please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171 , x 407 if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, 21/A-tAd/ ---.0_Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpin\Julia\sdr\empire batteries acc2.doc c: Victor and Judy Shoepe PO Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281 SDR 2000-00002/MLP 2000-00002 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 P4v s ..e,. 5DOO J !i "4 � Engineered • ' ESL• Structures Inc. •:...:gA ' .....,.."•:,..",.0 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 ° a Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 503-968-3118 Fax 503-968-6639 Letter of Transmittal I. F RECFINIFD To: City of Tigard { ' Julia Hajduk JAN 2 0 ?000 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97233 COMMUNITY ULVtLUPMENT WE ARE SENDING YOU: x Attached ❑ By Fax# ( i Under separate cover via: I I Construction Drawings ❑ Approval Drawings H Permit Drawings n Samples n Specifications ❑ Letter I I Change order n Other COPIES DATE No. DESCRIPTION 2 Sets of envelopes to neighboring properties. 1 City of Tigard generated mailing list 1 Sign design drawing (See site plan for location. 1 Solid waste hauler's letter approving trash/recycling enclosures. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: I For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For review and comment xFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ For Permits ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Prints returns after loan to us REMARKS: JULIA, RE: EMPIRE BATTERY SITE DESIGN REVIEW(7320 SW BONITA ROAD. HERE ARE THE STAMPED ENVELOPES FOR THE NEIGHBORS WITHIN 500'. ALSO I HAVE ATTACHED A SIGN DETAIL AND A COPY OF THE SOLID WASTE HAULER'S (PRIDE DISPOSAL) LETTER APPROVING THE TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURES. John Boutinen PROJECT MANAGER If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us immediately Site Design Review Submittal for the Empire Battery Project (Includes Land Partition) (1) Site Development Review Type II Application (1) Land Partition Type II Application i ' (20) Applicants Statements (1) Copy of Legal description and property sale contract(Ownership) (1) 11"x 17"vicinity map (1) 8-1/2" x 11 vicinity map (1) 8-1/2" x 11' site plan (1) Affidavit of posting. (1) Affidavit of mailing. (1) Copy of letter regarding public meeting. -({) Sign in list from public meeting. —(4) Copy of notes from public meeting. (1) Copy of letters from John Skourtes and Kevin Pike with comments on project. (2) sets of stamped pre-addressed envelopes to property owner's within 500'. (20) sets of 11"x 17"preliminary plans for project. Existing Conditions Plan Proposed Land Partition Plan Site Plan Bldg#1 Floor Plan Bldg#1 Elevations Bldg#2 Floor Plan Bldg#2 Elevations Cl Site Grading Plan C2 Site Utility Plan C3 Erosion Control Plan C4 Site Detail Sheet (20) sets of full size preliminary landscaping plans (1) Wetland Delineation Report (1) Copy of Pre-Application Conference Notes (2) Check for$1,600.00 for SDR. (1) Check for$156.00 for Land Partition at 20% of fee due to joint submittal. v UU I f Pride Disposal Co. 12e %, 7.220 s cam ,fa.er FaX To: 5. From: .� b LL / + ti ff rf V 3 y ( I Fax Ci L� � G q ) ' 3 - 0 O � .._._ .. Date: Phone: Pages: R°: Attn: VD� -- �tct 8 d ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment C7 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle TELEPHONE:(503)025.6177 FAX M (503) 625-6179 •Comments: j,4_ O rs PQ 541 v;f s Low - 1.A__ /1--i,t.„.617 . A ''1::- --------YV.-/tI i J � / , 1 , . ltd tiJ !Awful ' . i i 1, _ . .:1 to . !.... ,1 • , , . , , D I tt ii ! 11 ' / i iilt t : itlltts : xw=.n'�� I I\.S.11 \ I'3' ) i' g-: , t r: \tg v Li, C \ g 1 ! c I 4.01111... 1 t} ' V . - ,,.., 4 ...,,Cr 1 1111.1 S.: Ao- • I 1 4\.I'\I k .._.‘ , , I, ,.. A -a 114 V rr," s't. .' • 1/401 if /j• 1 �7�y p,���T .p� ,....z, .i., 11.. .1 ` , , . 1 . i 1 . i Li :4..,IC\ ' '..,..: .:i:::,,.\\: k t .l1 } +t}' 1 j ' v- ' ,r ! . 1 1TI . . _.. NA.. ■ �. 1. \\\\ti \-*..� '`51.E j w 3@I: - -- - - 1 eliCre^i+13N9g-9 ---- • .. ". • -- - -- - - '.---11.1. _- r t r _ vr ' 3 VC VC-. s,x rr+o a ill ^ --, ji A -Kso iJ.1.1..itti• ''' .314:::10....yg ,-af Qt /4, * . Id _ -■ - .-... - -, ..- III . - - • - . ... T •d — . 6E99-895-cos 'DWI '133 4y,:,b:T T ee, 81 Nar 1 _Z_[Lf1-1-nil r, n...-.- -- - - NO.634 p.3/8 ■...�. �_ •rte.2- M11..Ier• :C,:tr:.:� raid.Pa•E∎e .._.-- _ 99p4.1 ik •• egp - ...„ .4 .g 154 MONORANDUM_OP CCNTAACT O!' .ALL '"- esae ( st1 'I`�AI :Arno! Ceatmb.e .4‘...a 19011 '",: ;n» iCTWERN: Rod ?loom and First Vitt:stata Hank of Grogan, N.A., c;. I�'.y., J trusted. of the William N. Batt tt.tamantary trust dated �� May 27, 1982, 'vendor' � { - J ADt . c , an Oregon cor;oration, 'purahAser.' s ,i ,yr �.= Thia is a memoranduM or a real .Atilt contract in which Vendor ' (� sold to Purchaser the real property mart particularly descrited in N,,,:,'.1.:• ..zu2 Sahibit A, attached berate and by this rtftrenco "lade A Pare hoceot. ' .;.:• The true and actual Cansidaraticn for this can.t:act Ls $280,:00.. ! . .t:.. . Until a change is requested, all tax atatanenta shall be; t' tt'!7'�;•;• • Purchaser at the fallowing address: � ,+� .�' ��� Empire bateerita, 2nd. .• .e •`}h i.\i:, I'r't .m 7320 S.W. Bonita Road ,.,,{�L;• 1 r y� Tigard OR 37223 .• .,u 1 f} , ' - t:t :ntaratat, aank of ortifcdd ic;"ca_ .;.•. e _~e - ,;' ''•_r ,.aa � , {:Dy y • � / S D. 1 SOR' 'r t re 7. Sident;ir rr,.?NI ^CY YM7 � fi �nr :'r.• ` ._ _.a ,,•esf� rm FJ] l:..: sod M-• , .a- rustae .c. . - 7 jrt n1 2URCYA88R ZMPLRL aATTTI:e3, :NC. • `I �� '' T:3y (�•-cam 1 Ati : .: ' r w •tiLCt3r c. 3hoeRe, rest - Purchas.:'A oeligar:iorts in the contract ace ;+csonallig at a '- '64 this data by the undersigned. �� �j , c AIM �y\ 0 ti..,fF 11 •✓sear a. hoop. , m{ .,,� 1, � 1 f-et y / s nape 'J Page I - NSNOAANDUM OP COH'r2.1C' Cr 3ALS /.--- ' i.-'. , •AIM ALCCat]21i0 ASTSRpt To 7-RiT Dt `'3 TlReR'11T1: 7AtiX — 130. SW SCti -S — iartiatd. Oil Ate..-ti ory HUMOR y{,ti li:'....;1 ._ . '" *---------4:•-••......4rig,'-;':..- ' rt-+r • T • - : .=�rri (_r" -L - ''-- NO.634 P.4/8 .■•■••••s,.■■.,_:_ , 1•,.•.'%%04. 4 .•.1. ' . ./,.�Y'S°v'4.• .›C't'•. ••.•'a ' 1 .,rr.,,,.. I -rya+ 1T•. - • . : ' •1'•! `r`' ',.• ,N. tint..._ t z• u laiiiii 11 ! 4:yh 1. ., 'ii r' . I i. 7r,71; ~, ~ -'1 :Y.xz2PT:0:t '1.1 , \c . ( ijn PABCS: :7 T ,,I A pate at leatian 12. T niahip 2 Scut. Range 1 Vest of :.ha aillaauets 3No• .,;� uaridian. Juhiagttn County. Oregon acre particvlstly'!deeeribed a■ fol1C0111 __ 'ti,, !attracting at a point 13213 tent South tad 1316.70 her Weer of the nertheeet Pei tether of Station 1:. rhith point is alto the northeast earner of the 9outhweat • ,,3 quartar of the MO/:taut quartar of Said Section 1:: thence tooth 0' 111 „pet mom 640 feet to an iron rod st the !neartectioa of the youth lint of 3onita laid (County Read '0, 730 Id the vest line of Sauthveat adnd Avenue ;Count dead .•,' Yo. 126)1 :honor South 19' 2l' Vsat 434.13 het alon;,the moth has se soled •• ,: i* Road to en iron rod at :tea northeast corner of :hat: car:pin :rte: conveyed to ,i:�}^. ' Oenetal Saw Ca., in Oregon camera:ion. by deed recorded in 3eea 419, ?ap 239. �� ..,1 Reeartg of Jeahin$eae Counter, and the ::va point of heginnia4 of the hoot to 7. . he deaorihedt thanes South 3. 29' :ant slang the east Tins at said Caosral Saar ' a Sae:. a aiataaM' of 200 :Sac to the tout:aur corner thereon hers South 99' .:, A.. 21' +ens along the aoueh lino of to ouid Congeal Sae t:cot c dIJtants of : ;' 190.13 feet to a 2/4 inah iron pipe at rho •ouehvuat cuna: thetaae, Lein; also - a point on :he eaateriy ri1he of vay line of the Southern ?stiff Railroad; , tf + thence South 17' 19' liar aloes said right of way a dietaries ae 292.13 feet to :I 0 a S/3 Loth ;tan rod and also the noethvaee corner of that ::tot tonvayvd to Char se ?ago, :no.. by sane rcatdni ca 3ocordor': Too No. 7'101::991 taeeo ,.14w1 LL f Vote 53' 35' 36" last mars the north line of said 3hsr:at ?sae. :.t. :tact a .�1 diatanea of 161.11 feet. Sore or 1410. to a point vhie2t Sass 9out1 3' 29' Sale ;y at a point on the south tight oe vay tilts St 3onita chid (Caunr/ Road 4o. 1363 - :+nigh :a orb feet West at :he intersection of said rough tight of ray line of . 4,'‘.. 3onita Road with the west eight of ray :inn of Zauthvaat 7:no Avenue (County •dhR` Read No. t25)t them North e Nor 0• 19' Nest along :us vest lino of :hat ::one IA ' I:= doserihed In look 1123, ?ego 361. to the south right of way line of 3onita .',;4%''); Rced; !Since South d9' :1' Weer :inn; said touch a;he of vay lint a diatoms aC 13.36 fwt to the :eve 7o:ar of oe6S.nniai. '�,`-a•'�`k,'?AMC= 2:i y 'A ' " 1`aeaaaip 2 South, San;s 1 wee c of :ha 9tlaoot:a �;pact of SeaLen .., ;tt' � ehtesdan. Washington :runty. =rogue. seta partitvla iyl dsweri3e4 as follows a1 t ':at !ii: +��.app��ii� asitinnin; at • pain: 13:0 feet South and 1216.:0 feat ileac of the nor:bane .aria :ether of Soatao 11. vision yoont :a olio the northeast =oroar of :ha Southwest •^4.', tops quarter of the Northeast coerce, at acid Section 12: thence Seaeh C• 11' Net ;.,�■ gi 6.00 feet to ae :ova red ac the �csedeC:aa 31 the aeuch tine Si 7oeite goad r ..,`► (Count/ ,let. No. 7261 and the veer ino of Red Reek Iced (County Read Na. 123)1 T•4,,`•; -7.41 :hence South 39. 21. Weise .3 .1d :see along the sough line of Senita Road to on ,Is'•1; - .-7-1v--. iron rod and the true& paint of beginning Si the carnal,. heroin dean-_:nude thence' •.31 •�•� •- contiauin$ along the souta line of 'Janata Toed 250.00 feet to an iron rod an • .y•'b� _= :1e sear line of the :cht of •Jay of the S.P. Railroad; :hones South 17. 19' '�•, .0-T. '� ?oat :na.;7 fiat along coal easterly riche Si vay of :he S.P. 7eLlroae co an ~�`L.' °,1"*i� ,:,Ir ;:i ii: 1. 4.'-1j-Fl 7 fAA•.. - ''1 Art . --... r ,- __ - . .. _.. F.5i8 li T-7e,-. -:A.,/ 1,1?.'4'IP:-%;.... .. -.1,., ',-,Z ):-Itl .vajl '''..1\'114)14'4 itr't■..1. • , . • . } .. ' w +45:lit+ • ,. r,ra'1r ` ! �. •• r J•.PI T� �'��Hii�•1-r:��.�......�-...-... • h �l�Y�'�11'..7'I!• • ljurr- • �• • P t., item Tsai theme Worth 1111. 211 tact 1110.%3 fast es an iron kds thanes Harsh 0• 3111 Vast 2D0 teat is m ir•q rd an We aura Lao of Saaitla sad and tits true . point et beginning. r MONIII 80i3tCT TO tha statutory powers and assessments of the Unified Sewage Agency of Washington County and '' hr 9it3JSCT To an aaaement in favor of Tigard Raise District reeosded heron 6, 1973, in Zook 911, page 90, Waohington County records: and r. hicKs •! 90aJLCT TO an easement in favor of Unified Sewage Agency of Washington county recorded June 7, 1974, as fee No. 79021.947, s t. „agar Washington County ripcords. Y I � • e •• 14 ■ ;;TM " 1 k�71ni • . i !� � �t •Ww,i.' y •-_ yet ::.'.`s • V •••.. * ~ ' •3^Jk! / Li t: '-1,1.,:h a. le -• w i I • I' • �r•-+-� - - • .. N0.634 P.6,8 I —. --'="'"'°- _�'Z.`—''' _...hew z� golf". W/• a:''+....._.,• _ - ' j,, ' '' . " ' I flt'; �"I� .••f.• ..` Hall. A 1 . I .,� •Illy. ..... .. . 1 Lw•.. il • ,. I ■�� 1 int r {.^.4. STATIC OF ORISON ) I i Mee. F� � ) ii.I '-_ County o f Multnomah ) _ .7.201/11 The foregoing instrument Was aeknovledaed before �i I �%'�• ands day of December, 1936, by I • .. }�5. ? rat nearstira sank o aoragnn, R,A, fri::. i. NC.•11 PtlDLIC d'Qii cnt1-8 1'••N _: Hy Caamiaaion Expires: t o°' Aril= 3 'AT: Or OREGON } �:,..,-.1 County of Multnomah ) 1 � '� ) ss, Zit Personally appeared the above-named Rod Moore !and �,c .-, acknowledget t:�a foregoing inat;umant to ba Ass voluntary act ',. and 3..d, •• e 1 ,u{h { 9ubaerihad and ewer • " '' rue D n to b..ora me thin Z1" d aka... aY cf -".2 • '"COMNA A.3CWMAN ti tj NOTSRM PUALIC OAEGI,. . hammy pow= P FFY '.''q{' mi am a a tj� MY C omaiaaion 3xpi;as: 8T71TS or OAERON ! .t" -- n i as. .�- cou ty al Kaaningtan ) The :oragoinq instrument daa acknowledged tefore me �' r •• this _ I: day of December, I.9B6, by Victor D, Shoe a r�,±' of ;mps..a 3atteries, ;no., an Oregon ear?oration. op s:ehal!iof ,,;;'r` '- the :ocaoracion. ,� NCTJ1Rr POaz.: SCR CRat aN , —c"'• . m li Hy Commiaaton 9xpires: ' it ..,t l 9TAT! OT ORLOCw i ? ,��� „..) ..., ;1, a i i :•� , 1 a 5 D. :sal � 4 a � 'Cbunty of laahin eon 1 .I ,., ,.Personally sp aare3 va C nb°" "r Jody A. 9hoepe wno acknowiadq.dthaloregoinginstrumet toi "" their voluntary act ana deed. . P. 1 . Paga 9 - -AL »STAY! COMTRACT +r :• 1'T'•'. J`.. NO.634 P.7/8 • l.7 ��c�n .I.,3 4' ': :;r'.: `.j.t■ . , A 1 �,. k_ I 1:r• .I •1p4,,iQ1∎" .f..•. u • .,,� ,. i 11'b ., . h/ ' ■k' I+ Subectibed and sworn to Celore me thin ..�:day of A..n".n„ I ` .1.-,i's'; Pe o smbe r 1986. t••,, • '. lit/ ,O. "cif}�V:i 'J" .'�•,,; 1 ' :10J'AR )uB iC FOR .. .+, u My Commies/an IIxpiiea: 7 lif3'C�J,•/ I. 1' - STATE OF OREGON j ' .• : '. ; yy . •; •• • ,.I Caunty of Multnoafah ss. , *ember 24, 1986 ltir.:'' •1 .. Personally tppeertd James M. Wilson and (Martin O. Hansen. who, being duly i '' -''f''{ sworn, each for Himself and net ane for the other, i ' "� '15'j the ''lice President and that the latter is the Investment Off�leer of FIRSTrINTERSTATE I. • Y --(I. 94111( OF OREGON, N.A., a corporation, and that the seal affixed to the 1'oragoing instrument Is the corporate seal at said concretion and :ha said instrument row r . diractorsa andleachnobehalf hem acknawl q dosaid Instrumentrto be its voluntary act •'' and decd. • • ' /`�+.ri'f,• '. ' Notary ?nalic?or 6regoh „. lt.J�j�„ `ril M C:maission Expires: *1.. .'4.;'••,•1$•-•.."...-*/;.:1,' %Imp,Puauc:a• N i ' \\pta ham. ,1=• ih Cammi=,l femme • STAYS OF*mom f • '.ti' Carp M • ,.!4, I.cones W.mew.Molina Aleeelnlry en ? e Tomas me!a•Qalals Weems d Car • a: iN nom Inunrnenl al warm•sa monad ' inn Malt .'In coon al wall M ease weenie • Ili 1 LtinUa Maw.Ml .*DM al - Onao CamM ilU. 1. „t y 19D6DEC 31 PM Zr 22 w .- •, i SL Ti Lam--r--LLL(I - - -- - -- 1 SFE MAP' 1 ro as 25 1 YL.A tl — -) S.W. >: I BON I TA 7 /� s > ts.s. r— lssi-s i ' 1 nab se�i4p +ds+er) A ROAD :n +n.3. ._ rJ.7as�, _ (-4r,-,.___ -1 1 ��^ fu0 1 t� :11 30U ar• t�._. kN)1� i� r.nRk. 700 ( 4 .nr Ifl�trsr I,grAc 111.411 AI dull-AI -O 101-MI tort' S , . I nar Y ts,o I -_ r J" enn r Z00 r 49 Z -- — l� art E�• �"t .,a. sf 2.,00 a u 400 }./9 AG w+s s r-it• Z elAQ f.. sli a • +;800 801 arlr .se Ac. 0 .sllc.. _ F--- ��— t l�su �` - - __. ---- - - - - - L a r 500 g ( M /98 AC We till SEE MAP -R 1000 3 2S 1 1280 _ . - 1004-MI 23--81 .7.. atir u., m 1240 - in"+oaf. O «�vt 1100 1 153.Y 6 1.64 l b� le I- A. IN .NN 0 20 m n 21 r 9 . ,..,� ..t if z '� 48 zzoo , s 1• �` - .a2 AC_ i.R 23-7 ' -: _ ...,_...... r J Krf I y • 2100 (07.112161 Z f sass( CREEK( — .— �nis1` — - _96k_ bcAd •FORM NJ: 717—BARGAIN AND SALE DEED Ilndivldual, •post.). ��.. -EVENS•NESS LAW PUB.CO..PORTLAND.OR.9!204 04--- • — -- — -- — I `BARGAIN AND SALE DEED aCA> , _ ' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF OREGON, N.A. , and ROD MOORE, Co-Trustees of the William N. Flett Testamentary Trust OW((i y 1 y , hereinafter called grantor, (Ile cOnst or'Itinn9lef011ltiftor stated, does hereby grant, bargain, soil and convoy unto . ...... . ....... . ..... ... ._. .. .... EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. , an Oregon corporation, hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee's heirs, successors and assigns all of that certain real property with the tenements, hereditarnents and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated in the County of _ Washington , State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" Attached hereto. a/k/a: 7320 S.W. Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon. This deed is granted in fullfillment of that certain Contract dated December 31 , 1986, of which the Memorandum of Contract was recorded on December 31 , 1986, as Fee No. 86061915. I i I 0 °I OrVt.° • ts0 1/4}-1X-W-1. t\ C 0 ca I IIF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is $ 3.80,000.00 11JOfi CYC,, `r ' ETCH—tldn oist`s,— i—e —haul Hdoa o - - - . - - _ the while y+ consideration i06+161-44+' 0 - - •- •.-- - . • . -- . - . .. . . • . ••. 1 In construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical 1 changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. I In Witness Whereof, the grantor has executed this instrument this.. th_...day of.. ... January , 19 £37. ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed and seal affixed by its officers, duly authorized thereto by order of its board of directors. FIRSI INTERST E BAr OF DREG N, rl.A , CC -Taus tee - ,y v THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DE- y: ,_ n Trust Officer ' SCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND iUSE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING By: , e e) Investment Officer THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE Y , PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. —'e / �'Z;L Rod 1oore Co-Trustee " (If the signer of Ih•above I,a corporation, f use the form of acknowledgment opposite.) [ORS 194.570) STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, County of Mul tnomah >ss County of Multnomah )ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this January 6 , 19 .7,by.Lloyd O. Randall , Trust. , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ja yMary 2(I, 19..B7,by Officer president,and by.Niaryin. h... Hansen, Investment I ri ��j;( /2-�r'`z��F� Officer secretary of. First. Interstate .Bank of _.. .. ,r _.. � . .. Rod Moore, a:--Co=4Trustre-17-P"'Ct[e`.",-- -- Eregon r114,4..„A -l9rus,te4.-Qf_-111- William it Elea t T: amenta ry rust, , oration,on behalf o the corporation. William N. F 1 tt Testamentary_ Trust r deb (SEAL) eiptf�r}��d,+�tfil=°tc,fiNtlp.foi Notary Pub!c tbP Pali_ R. F3OWMAN P t .IAF(Y PUBLIC r I y p (SEAL) Afy coma,isslon ex i t,Ot.t:ls�� M co amiss on ex ires:NOTAIlY PUBLIC o Fault My cl,(nH►;�s;>I, Expires 111.7.11./._ r�--- _ M Commission Expires�� $ .x.ca d i' a P,...,.,-,ii h--_ Ills cor orate seal I FIRST INTERSTATE BANK .OF...OREGON,...N.A.,...and STATE OF OREGON, I ROD MOORE, Co.-Trustees }ss. f P. 0. Box 2971, Portland, Oregon 97208 County of 1; _ GRANTOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS' I certify that the within instru- ment EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. (Attn: V. G. Shoepe) meat was received for record on tiTe I; 7320 S.W. Bonita Road day of , 19 , Ili Tigard, Oregon 97223 at o'clock M., and recorded GRANTEE'S NAME AND ADDRESS SPACE RESERVED in book/reel/volume No on Alter recording return lo: FOR RECORDER'S USE page or as fee/file/instru- ment/microfilm/reception No , Record of Deeds of said county. NAME,ADDRESS,ZIP Witness my hand and seal of County affixed. Until a Chang.Is r.qu.sI.d all lax statements shall be tent to the following address. NAME TITLE NAME.ADDRESS.ZIP By Deputy • • • .1 • DESCRIPTION PARCEL I: A part of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 1320 feet South and 1316.70 feet West of the northeast corner of Section 12, which point is also the northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 0° 11 ' West 6.00 feet to an iron rod at the intersection of the south line of Bonita Road (County Road No. 736) and the west line of Southwest 72nd Avenue (County Road No. 126) ; thence South 89° 21 ' West 454.38 feet along the south line of Bonita Road to an iron rod at the northeast corner of that certain tract conveyed to General Saw Co. , an Oregon corporation, by deed recorded in Book 479, Page 339, Records of Washington County, and the true point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 0° 39' East along the east line of said General Saw tract, a distance of 200 feet to the southeast corner thereof; thence South 89° 21 ' West along the south line of the said General Saw tract a distance of 190. 13 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the southwest corner thereof, being also a point on the easterly right of way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad; thence South 17° 19' East along said right of way a distance of 292.95 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod and also the northwest corner of that tract conveyed to Charter Page, Inc. , by deed recorded as Recorder's Fee No. 79016099; thence North 55° 55' 38" East along the north line of said Charter Page, Inc. tract a distance of 163.11 feet, more or less, to a point which bears South 0° 39' East of a point on the south right of way line of Bonita Road (County Road No. 736) which is 426 feet West of the intersection of said south right of way line of Bonita Road with the west right of way line of Southwest 72nd Avenue (County Road No. 126); thence North 0° 39' West along the west line of that tract as described in Book 1118, Page 381, to the south right of way line of Bonita Road; thence South 89° 21' West along said south right of way line a distance of 28.30 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL IIi A part of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette teridian, Washington County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 1320 feet South and 1316.70 feet West of the northeast corner of Section 12, which point is also the northeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 12; thence South 0° 11' West 6.00 feet to an iron rod at the intersection of the south line of Bonita Road (County Road No. 736) and the west line of Red Rock Road (County Road No. 126) ; thence South 89° 21 ' West 454.38 feet along the south line of Bonita Road to an iron rod and the true point of beginning of the parcel herein described; thence continuing along the south line of Bonita Road 250.00 feet to an iron rod on the east line of the right of way of the S.P. Railroad; thence South 17° 19' East 208.77 feet along said easterly right of way of the S.P. Railroad to an iron rod; thence North 89° 21' East 190.13 feet to an iron rod; thence North 0° 39' West 200 feet to an Iron rod on the south line of Bonita Road and the true point of beginning. SUBJECT TO the statutory powers and assessments of the Unified Sewage Agency of Washington County; and SUBJECT TO an easement in favor of Tigard Water District recorded March 6, 1973, in Book 912, Page 90, Washington County records ; and SUBJECT TO an easement in favor of Unified Sewage Agency of Washington County recorded June 7, 1979, as fee No. 79021847, Washington County records . AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard` Tigard,OR 97223 I, John Boutinen , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed development affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently. registered) 7360 SW Bonita Rd , and did on the 27th day of September 19 99 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a building permit application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 7360 SW Bonita Rd. , Tigard, OR (state location you posted notice on property) NalWeffigy, Si: r:ture (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 19c\c) • , OFFICIAL SEAL j CATHERINE SPEIGHT � �� ��,1� COMMISSION�NO-.3163 9N NOTARY PUBLIC OF.O GO `"`a NY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.24,2002 !, My Commission Expires: 9LI oa (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) I NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: � Rl�!• ��� ` Name of Applicant/Owner: •c �;'1.�l �y,�r. ��r7T3.'1ic � l Address or General Location of Subject Property: r �'t' �R ��= ',Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): G __ .mss S I h:Vogin\patty masterstaffpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, John Boutinen • being duly sworn, depose and say that on September 24 , 19 99, I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 73fifl SW Rnni to Rd Tigard OR - (Tax Lot 300, 251 , 12AC) a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1991Q St., Main St_ , Tigard, OR with postage prepaid thereon. .� .L Sifature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 19T.1 OFFICIAL SEAL �.en r CATHERINE SPEIGHT �� • a NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON — # COMMISSION NO.316379 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OR GO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.24,2002 • My Commission Expires: (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement wit proposed project) NAME OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NAME: —“ne*Tt•-t_ ■ - V S TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ,�i ■ } I u. (Name of Applicant/Owner: G ' V`E.� F4 r �_> 'Address or General Location of Subject Property: _ r mS ��. Z�te Lora,► [Subject Property Map(s) ( ) _ • J I � perty Tax Ma (s)and Lot#s : s �°d i � • h:Voyinipatty■ asterstaffmail.mst September 24, 1999 Name Address City RE: Empire Batteries Building Project Dear Interested Party: I am representing the owner's of the property located at 7360 SW Bonita (Tax Lot 300, 2S1, 12AC) in Tigard, Oregon. Empire Batteries is proposing to build approximately 19,000 square feet of new light industrial buildings on the southern (rear) portion of this site. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, would like to discuss the project in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on October 11, 1999 at 5:30 at the following location. Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. The plans may be altered prior to the submittal for application at the City of Tigard. I look forward to meeting and discussing this project with you. Please call me if you have questions regarding this project at 968-3118. Sincerely, John Boutinen rF q9 :3 Pp' 1-face ±4 wt Z p e. (e G-ffekacke ,Ce„ (us V 2 h cJ P>ttl:f7lJ e06 4.1 tl o L./CL S c-Ccc.C r-at.c.,AJ /Le N .271--- S 45 Pi 4 SSG Sc f!J (cif I �S ogU r -f -( 6 au L . 'Zi41 113 (<0%-t_17fS (�SoeJ f 'P� V cc` I P� V I e clef Ite Etc c l 5 p C c4- y'l aeC � —�- s 4€. es sly c fior- c._ s o 1-4 S C�� Cc,U S a to C C.£'S1LOA) etr-cpck.t7 2 GQr c v ecctoz gc,"...)s5 Co-13 th-u.c- I c.ocO C / S C (�.(� C v4 S arc c,t-2cj__T -!� October 11, 1999 Public Meeting for proposed development at 7320 SW Bonita Road. Please sign in with your name and address. 1 . 1 A . St/too-0A_ 7 360 5 CO E3t0,74 2. /4. SL _73 6o S tAI 2 ) TC;Ofiri 3. 3 L BL i.,e4) 7 3 6o $(4) f fryvz�K 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. National Safety Co. Inc. OCT 14 100a 17010 S W Weir Rd Beaverton, Or. 97007 14 October 99 Mr. John Boutinen C/0 Engineered Structures Inc. 7360 S W Hunziker Rd. Suite 101 Tigard, Or. 97223 Subject: Proposed Empire Battery Project Dear Mr. Boutinen: The site plan as submitted was reviewed. One area of concern which should be changed is the proposed landscape strip parallel to our driveway. This driveway has been heavily reinforced to withstand the weight of fully loaded 80,000 pound sheetrock trucks. A three foot landscape strip will undermine the existing road bed because of the difference in elevations. Your project should be designed to show our driveway with a three foot buffer of river rock then your sidewalk. If the planners do not accept the above we will actively assist you in getting this design thru the system. Any other solution will not work. Back in 1990 Empire Battery and ourshelves agreed to maintain the status quo. The dispute was about adverse possession. Today the only critical area is the reinforced driveway parallel to our building enumerated above. The river rock buffer should avoid any damage to the roadbed. Sinccerel , lJ r National Safety Co. Inc. John R. Skourtes / SABRE oc1 iuyq CONSTRUCTION COMPANY October 18, 1999 Mr. John Boutinen Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223-2305 RE: Empire Batteries Building Project Your letter of September 24, 1999 to Richard G. Pike, Trustee Dear Mr. Boutinen: Pursuant to your letter of September 24th and my telephone message to you of October 12th, please accept this letter as my written request to meet and discuss your proposed new development of the Empire Batteries site. As I indicated in my message to you, I am representing my father, Richard Pike, on behalf of the Pike Family Trust. The family trust is the owner of the property at 7235 SW Bonita Road. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to arrange a time for me to meet with you to review your plans and the potential impact the development of the site may have upon the neighboring businesses. Respectfully, (� Kevin M. Pike President Enc. 7235 SW Bonita Road•Tigard,OR 97224 CCB #32944 � / as PO Box 231026•Portland,OR 97281 SabreConst @AOL.com Phone 503/639-5151 Fax 503/620-6005 U9- '3.99 THU U9: U FAX 503 08844 UREG0N TITLE 000.3 )regon Title/Washington (OR) #37 -Owner : Knhs Development Co / Parcel . R0511128 Site : 14865 SW 74Th Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : 05/03/1989 Mail : 26262 S Meridian Rd Aurora Or 002 Price Use : 3002 Vacant,Industrial MktTot : $262,920 Legal :FANNO CREEK ACRE CTS, LOT 19-20, 98-99 Taxes : $3,927.45 : ACRES 3.53 Telephone Census : Tract 308 02 Block : 3 MapGrid: 655 G6 RefPar# : 2S112AC 01200 Bedrni : Bth YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac : 3.53 #38 - — Owner • Big T Investments Parcel : R0510913 Site • 7225 SW Bonita Rd Tigard 97224 Xfered : 12/04/1989 Mail : 2314 SE Park Crest Ave Vancouver Wa 98683 Price . Use : 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MktTot : $355,800 Legal : ACRES .58 98-99 Taxes . $5,414.37 : Telephone Census : Tract 307.00 Block : 2 ildapGrid. 655 G6 RefPar# : 2S112AB 01000 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool • BldgSF: Ac : .58 #39 Owner Tennant Investors Parcel : R0510968 0 Site : 7P 235 SW Bonita Rd Tigard 97224 .�fered :Mail O Box 1658 Portland Or 97207 Price Use 2312 Mise,Non Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone NAM: : $633,850 Legal ACRES 1.28 98-99 Taxes . $9,645.55 : Telephone Census : Tract : 307.00 Block : 2 MapGrld: 655 G6 ReJParft 2S112AB 01200 Bedrm : Bth . YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac : 1.28 #40 Owner Tennant Investors Parcel : R0510959 Site : 7333 SW Bonita '• "tgard 97224 I(Ga Investors --‹ Xfered • Mail : PO Box 1658 P. and Or 97207 , Price . Use : 3032 Mfg proved,Ind Zone,State Respon MktTot : $1,304,080 Legal AC• - .43, SEE Al ACCOUNT(S) 98-99 Taxes • $19,844.70 Telephone Censuact : 307.00 Block ; 2 MapGrid: 655 G6 RefPar# . 2S112AB 01300 Bedrm ; Bth : YB : Gar. Pool . BldgSF: Ac: 2.43 #41 - Owner • Bilk Properties Llc Parcel . R0511075 Site : 7440 SW Boni . 'd Tigard 97224 l ( Xfered 01/13/1997 Mail : 14280 SW d Ave Tigard Or 97224 ._ 1 �� Price . $2,050,000 Use • 3012 I.•,improved MktTot : $832,060 Legal . A '1 S 1 67 98-99 Taxes • $12,429 23 Telephone : Cens : Tract : 308.02 Block : 3 ivfapGrid: 655 G6 RefPar# 2S112AC 00600 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool . BldgSF. Ac: 1.67 6 e.4.1, GATHER NE SEAL u,..-Q, 3 ` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON x �.„,, COMMISSION N0.318379 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.24,2002 \\\�\Q� The/nformatton Provided Is Deemed Reliable But if Not Gaaranraed. 09/23/99 THU 09:17 FAX 5032208844 OREGON TITLE X002 Oregon Title/Washington (OR) # 1 - -- -- __—_ . Owner Fought Company Inc Parcel : R0510940 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered nMail : PO Box 23759 Tigard Or 97281 Price : ,I Use : 3032 Mfg,Improved,Ind Zonc,State Respon MktTot $1,869,200 k.1/Legal : MACHINERY&EQUIPMENT ONLY 98-99 Taxes : $28,444.34 Telephone : Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar# : 2S112AB 00800 Bedrm Bth : YB : Gar: Pool BldgSF: Ac : #2 - — Owner : Fought&Company Inc _ - ' Parcel : R0510977 Site . 'Na Site Address* t. .i;r Xfred • Mail : PO Box 23759 i and Or 97281 Price : $93,541 C.41e : 3002 Vac. ,Industrial MkrTot : $65,580 Legal A 58 98-99 Taxes : 5997,97 : TeIephone . Census : Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar# : 2S112AB 00900 Bedrm : 13th : YB : Gar: Pool . BldgSF: Ac : .58 #3 .- Owner : Kr' Development Co Parcel : R0511119 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered : 05/03/1989 'flail : 26262 S Mendian Rd Aurora Or 97002 Price : (c,' : 3002 Vacant,Industrial MktTot : S99,180 k `.--J Legal ACRES 1.98 98-99 Taxes $1,481.53 Telephone : Census : Tract : Block . MapGrid: RefParr : 2S112AC 00900 I3edrm : Bth : 113 : Gar: Pool: BldgSF: Ac : 1.98 #4 - - Owner : Alpha Limited Partnership Parcel : R0511226 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered : 09/21/1993 Mail : 14725 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard Or 97224 Price : $1,400,000 Use . 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,IndZone MktTot : $1,313,900 Legal : ACRES 4.19 98-99 Taxes : $19,994.13 : Telephone : 503-598-4700 Census Tract Block : _MapGrid: RefPar# : 2S 112AC 02400 Bedrm : 8th : YB : 1980 Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac: 4.19 #5 - --- — _ Owner : C it C Development Parcel • R0511253 Site . *No Site Address* Xfered • 01/06/1992 Mail : PO Box 4010 Tualaun Or 97062 Price : $880,000 '.--_. ' Use : 2312 Misc,Nan-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone Mkrlor : $884,280 Legal : FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,LOT PT 48, 98-99 Taxes : $13,456.43 ACRES 2.15 Telephone . Census : Tract • Block . MapGrid: RefPar4 • 2S112AC 02300 Bedrm : Bth . YB : Gar• Pool . BldgSF: Ac: 2.15 #6 - - Owner : National Safety Co Parcel : R0955194 Site • *No Site Address* Xfered . Mail : 14480 Yorba Ave Chino Ca 91710 Price Use 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,tnd Zone MktTot : $300,290 Legal . ACRES .84 98-99 Taxes : $4,485 69 • Telephone : Census . Tract . Block : MapGrid: RefParto 2S112AC 00400 Bedrrn • Bth . YB : Gar: Pool. BldgSF. Ac : .84 Thu Infurmaaon Provrded it Deemed Reliable,But 13 11.:Guaranteed. r U8- s!89 THU 09:17 FAX 503: 08844 OREGON TITLE (J1003 Oregon Title/Washington (OR) #7 Owner : Pacific Realty Associates Parcel ; R0971345 Site : *No Site Address* Afered : 10/06/1989 Mail : 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy#300-Wm Portland Or 97224 Price : $262,682 7) Use : 3002 Vacant,lndustrial MktTot • $2,000 Legal : ACRES 43 98-99 Taxes : $29.80 . Telephone Census : Tract Block • MapGrid RefParti : 2$112AC 01000 Bedrm . Bth : YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac : .43 #8 — -- Owner . Skourtes John R Parcel • R1262966 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered : 0 V1k1Mail 17010 SW Weir Rd Beaverton Or 97007 Price Use • 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone Tot $115,890 0 Legal IMPROVEMENT ONLY 98-99 Taxes : $1,731.13 Telephone : 503-649-2032 Census • Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefParli : 2S112AC 00500 Bedrm : Bth : YB . Gar: Pool • BldgSF: Ac . #9 — Owner : Southern Pacific Transportation Parcel : R1369959 0 Site • *No Site Address* Xfered Mail : 1700 Famam St#10Th Omaha NE 68102 Price Use : 3002 Vacant,Industnal MktTot : Legal : ACRES .43, SUBSURFACE RIGHTS ONLY 98-99 Taxes : Telephone • Census . Tract . Block • ,LlapGrid. Re1Parri : 2S112AC 01000 Bedrm • Bth : YB . Gar: Pool ' BldgSF• Ac : ,43 # 10 -- - - -- — Owner . Southern Pacific Trans'. - :lion Parcel : R1369968 Site • *No Site Address* =`{ - Xfered : Mail : 1700 F . s. t#10Th Omaha NE 68102 ' Price Use • 3002 .cant,Industnal MktTot : Legal . "• S .85, SUBSURFACE RIGHTS ONLY 98-99 Taxes : Telephone : Census . Tract : Block • :LlapGrid: RefPar# . 2S 112AC 00400 Bedrm : Bth • YB . Gar: Pool : BldgSF; Ac. .85 # 11 Owner • Union Central Life Parcel : R2006889 Site . No Site Address* iii/v5 Xfered Mail a rt 5 S ■ Price Use : 3002 Vacant,Industrial MktTot : Legal ACRES 2.71, 1/2 INTEREST MINERAL 98-99 Taxes RIGHTS ONLY Telephone ' Census : Tract : Block • ,LlapGrid: RefPard . 2S112AD 00500 Bedrm . BM : YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac • 2.71 # 12 /' Owner Union Central . Parcel : R2006890 Site : *No Site A ss* Q ' Xfered : Mail Price . Use . 3002 /acant,Industrial MktTot : Legal ; ACRES 183, MINERAL RIGHTS ONLY, 98-99 Taxes : 1/2 INTEREST ONLY Telephone Census ' Tract : Block : :LlapGrid RefParrt . 2S 112AD 00600 Bedrm • Bth • YB . Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac . 2.83 The Informancn Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. 09/23/99 THL' 09:18 FAX 5032208844 OREGON TITLE f2)004 Oregon Tide/Washington (OR) # 13 — • Owner : Union Central Lif- Parcel : R2006891 Site : *No Site Ad, s* Xfered : Mail : Price Use 3002 V. ant,Industrial MktTot : Legal : AC•.'S 2.48,MINERAL RIGHTS ONLY, 98-99 Taxes : . 1 INTEREST ONLY Telephone : Census • " Tact . Block : MapGrid: ReJPart : 2S112AD 00501 Bedrm : Bth : YB • Gar: Pool : 8ldgSF: Ac : 2.48 # 14 • z Owner : Union Central . e Parcel . R2006896 Site : No Site A ss* Xfered : Mail • / Price : Use : 3002 cant,Industrial MktTot • Legal • ACRES .24, 1/2 INTEREST MINERAL 98-99 Taxes . : RIGHTS ONLY Telephone : Census . Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar/i : 2S 112AC 00101 Bedrm : Bth . YB • Gar: Pool : BIdgSF: Ac: .24 # 15 -- ------ Owner : Tigard City Of Parcel R2007193 Site : *No Site Address* Xfered . 01/15/1990 Mail • 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Price Use : 9152 Gov,City MktTot . Legal • ACRES 83, NON-ASSESSABLE 98-99 Taxes : Telephone : 503-526-2200 Census • Tract : Block : MapGrid. ReJPariL • 2S112AC 00801 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool : BIdgSF. Ac . .83 # 16 -- Owner Tn-County Industrial Parcel . R2030799 Site No Site Address* _kfered : 06/22/1995 Mail : 2106 SE Ochoco St Milwaukie Or 97222 Price : $1,208,025 • - Use : 2382 Misc,Under Improvcment,Ind Zone MkiTot : $197,860 Legal . BONITA INDUSTRIAL PARK,LOT PT 1, 98-99 Taxes : $2,955.59 ACRES 1.18 Telephone : Census . Tract : Block : MapGrid: RefPar# . 2S112AB 01900 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool . BIdgSF: Ac : 1.18 # 17 Owner • Tn-County Industn 414----- Parcel • R2030800 Site : *No Site Addre = 17'1ko‘c 414----- Parcel . 06/22/1995 Mail 2106 SE Oc•,co St Milwaukie Or 97222 Price : $1,208,025 Use : 3002 V.-. t,Industrial MktTot - $161,520 Legal . BO I. A INDUSTRIAL PARK, LOT 2, 98-99 Taxes : $2,412.77 RES 1.00 Telephone : Census : Tract . Bloc A.fapGrld• RefPar4 : 2S112AB 02000 Bedrm . Bth : YB : Gar: Pool : BldgS'F• Ac . 1.00 # 18 — Owner • Tn-County In.,grill Parcel : R2030807 Site : *No Site •dress* )(fired . 06/22/1995 Mail : 2I06 SE Ochoco .lwaukie Or 97222 Pace • $1,208,025 Use : 3002 Vacant, ••ustrial MktTot : $35,700 Legal , BONITA e'bUSTRIAL PARK,LOT PT 1, 98-99 Taxes $533.28 : AC' : .34 Telephone : Census • Tr-ct : Block • MapGrid• ReJPard : 2S112AB 01901 Bedrm ./ Bth : Y13 : Gar : Pool • B1dgSF. Ac • .34 The lnformanon Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is tior Guaranteed 09/23,99 THI: 09:18 FAX 5032208844 OREGON TITLE IdJ005 ' Oregon Title/Washington (OR) # 19 — - ---..-- — - • Owner : Tigard City Of Parcel : R2030815 Site : *No Site Addr- * Xfered : Mail • 13125 SW all Blvd Tigard Or 97223 Price . Use : 9152 ,City MktTot • Legal • BO ' A INDUSTRIAL PARK,TRACT PT B, 98-99 Taxes . : - RES 5.57, NON-ASSESSABLE Telephone : 503-526-2200 Censu : Tract : Block : /tIapGrid. RefPar : 2S112BA 06200 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool . BIdgSF• Ac : 5.57 #20 Owner • Bonita Packaging Products Parcel R2043179 Site . *No Site Address* Xfered i 'O4fail : 7333 SW Bonita Rd Portland Or 97224 Price : /Use : 3032 Mfg,Improved,lnd Zone,State Respon MktTot . $2,389,450 Legal • MACHINERY AND/OR EQUIPMENT ONLY 98-99 Taxes : $35,428.24 Telephone 503-684-6542 Census : Tract . Block : MapGrid• RefParif : 2S112AB 01300 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool : BIdgSF: Ac : #21 - --- Owner • National Safety Co Inc ;� Parcel • R2066011 Site : *No Site Address* - \ Xfered : 11/14/1996 Mail : 17010 SW W . d Beaverton Or 97007 Price • S120,000 Use : 3002 V t,Industnal MktTot . $34,450 Legal : A S .33, SEE Al ACCOUNT(S) 98-99 Taxes • $514.63 Telephone . Census : Tract . Block . MapGrid: ReiPar • 2S112AC 00500 Bedrm . 13th : Yf3 : Gar: Pool • BIdgSF. Ac . .33 #22 . - Owner : Mellon Leasing Corporation Parcel : R2072301 Site : *No Site Address* Xfired : Mail : 525 Market St#3500 San Francisco Ca 94105 Price . Use . 3032 Mfg,Improved,Ind Zone,State Rcspon Mktlot • $769,460 Legal MACHINERY AND/OR EQUIPMENT ONLY 98-99 Taxes . $11,709.18 Telephone • Census : Tract • Block : IvlapGrid: RefPar# : 2S112AB 01300 Bedrm : 13th : YB : 1997 Gar• Pool : 131dgSF: Ac • #23 Owner • National Safety Co Parcel : R0511191 Site : 17010 SW Bom d Tigard 90-? .Yfered 08/31/1993 • Mail : 17010 SW tr Rd Beaverton Or 97007 Price Use • 2312 N ' c,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone A'IktTot $668,160 Legal : A S 1.95 98-99 Taxes : $10,167.65 Telephone . Census . Tract : Block : MapGrid. 655 G6 RejParr : 2S112AC 00200 Bedrm • Bth . YB : Gar: Pool • BIdgSF: Ac 1.95 #24 Owner • Donnelly Thomas J Parcel : R2006895 . Site . 9585 SW 158Th Ave Beaverton 97007 Xjered : 07/03/1996 / a Mail • 1431 Covelo Ct Las Vegas Nv 89146 Price • _ Use : 3002 Vacant.Industnal MktTot . $26,750 Legal ACRES .18 98-99 Taxes : $407.05 Telephone • Census . Tract 318 02 Block . 9 MapGrid• 624 H5 RefPar!1 • 2S112AC 00101 Bedrm • Bth . YB • Gar • Pool : BIdgSF. Ac : .18 The Intormanon Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not G,4arani&ed. U9/:::.3/99 THU U9:19 FAX 503 0884.3 OREGON TITLE 0006 Oregon Title/ Washington (OR) #25 --- Owner : Pike Richard G Trustee Parcel : R1200257 Site : 2234 Femwood Cir Lake Oswego 97034 Xfered ; 07/16i1993 Mail 7235 SW Bonita Rd Tigard Or 97224 Price Use : 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MktTot : $175,930 • Legal : ACRES .32 98-99 Taxes . $2,677.19 Telephone Census : Tract • Block MapGrid. ReJPar=i • 2S 112AB 01100 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool BldgSF: Ac • .32 #26 - — Owner Andersen H A Et Al Parcel : R0510931 Site . 14255 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered 02/28/1997 \ Mail 610 SW Alder St#1200 Portland Or 97205 Price Use : 3032 Mfg,Intproved,Ind Zone,State Respon MktTot $2,069,960 Legal ACRES 8.90, SEE Al ACCOUNT 98-99 Taxes $31,499.40 Telephone • Census • Tract ; 307.00 Block : 2 lvlapGrid• 655 G6 ReJParii • 2S112AB 00800 Bedrm : Bth . YB : Gar• Pool : BldgSF: Ac: 8.90 #27 - Owner : Spieker Properties Lp Parcel R0510904 Site 14280 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : 11/18/1993 /Jail • 4380 SW Macadam Ave#100 Portland Or 97201 Price • $10 Use : 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MktTot : $1,281,040 Legal • ACRES 3.40 98.99 Taxes $19:494.10 Telephone : 503-221-5700 Census Tract : 307.00 Block : 2 MapGrid: 655 06 ReJParrf • 2S112AA 00500 Bedrm . Bth • YB : Gar: Pool • BldgSF: Ac : 3,40 #28 Owner • Donnelly Thomas J Parcel . R0511235 Site 14529 SW 72Nd a Tigard 97224 Xfered • 07/03/1996 Mail : 1431 Covelo Las Vegas Nv 89146 Price Use 2312 Mi ,_'on-Mfg,Improvement,lnd Zone M'k of • $81,980 Legal • AC .19 98-99 Taxes . $1,247.52 Telephone Census : Tract : 308.02 Block : 3 MapGrid: 655 G6 RefParr : 2S112AC 00100 Bedrm Bth . YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF• Ac ' .19 #29 Owner • Rogers Machinery Company Parcel R1298456 Site : 14600 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered Mail • 14600 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard Or 97224 Price Use : 3012 Ind,Improved MktTor . $2,434,150 Legal • ACRES 2.48 98.99 Taxes S37,041.43 Telephone : 503-639-6151 Census • Tract . 308.02 Block : 3 MapGrid. 655 G6 RejParc • 2S112AD 00501 Bedrm : Bth • Y'B • Gar. Pool • BldgSF. Ac 2.48 #30 — - Owner . Rogers Machinery Co I Parcel • R1233835 Site 14650 SW 72Nd igard 97224 Xfered Mail . 14600 SW 72 Ave Tigard Or 97224 Price Use 3012 Ind, proved MkrTot . $1,473,290 Legal . AC 2.71 98-99 Taxes . $22,419.65 Telephone : 503-639-6151 Census • Tract • 308.02 Block : 3 MapGrid. 655 06 RefPar+s . 2S112AD 00500 Bedrm . 13th ' Y"B Oar: Pool . BldgSF Ac : 2.71 The Information Provided Is Deemed RClrahla,But Is Not Guaranteed. _-I ua% s a,l nil 09: 19 FAX 507 08844 OREGON TITLE (Z1 00 i Oregon Title/Washington (OR) #31 • ----- . Owner Ryder Truck Rental Inc 18'76 Parcel : R0511333 Site : 14750 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : 10/31/1995 _ Mail PO Box 25719 Miami Fl 33102 Price $880,000 Use 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MktTot : S640,390 /$ Legal : ACRES 2.83 98-99 Taxes : $9,745.05 Telephone : Census ' Tract : 308.02 Block : 3 MapGrtd• 6.55 G6 ReJPar?! ' 2S112AD 00600 Bedrm Cith : YB ' Gar• Pool : BldgSF: Ac : 2.83 #32 Owner : Crombie Allen P Parcel : R0511244 Site : 14835 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 .Yfered : Mail : 632 Charman St Oregon City Or 97045 Price Use 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone MktTot : $255,630 Legal - FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS, LOT PT 48, 98-99 Taxes : $3,890.03 : ACRES .53 Telephone ' Census ' Tract : 308.02 Block : 3 MapOrid: 655 G6 RefPard : 2S112AC 02200 Bedrm : 13th : YI3 : Gar: Pool . BldgSF: Ac: .53 #33 Owner Chamberlain-Hussa Properties Parcel : R0511262 Site . 14865 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered : 05/24/1994 Mail : 18755 SW Teton Ave Tualatin Or 97062 Price : Use . 2312 Misc,Non-Mfg,Improvement,Ind Zone Mktfot . S510,200 Legal • FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS,LOT PTS 47 98-99 Taxes : $7,763.91 : &48, ACRES .96 Telephone Census Tract . 308,02 Block : 3 MapGrid• 655 G6 P.eJPat?t ' 2S112AC 02100 Bedrm : Bth : YB : 1993 Gar' Pool• BldgSF. Ac - .96 #34 Owner : Bilk Properties Lie Parcel : R0511093 Site . 14605 SW 74Th Ave Tigard 97224 Xfered 01/13/1997 Alai! 14280 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard Or 97224 Price : $2,050,000 Use • 3012 Ind,Improved MktTot • $447,140 Legal . ACRES 86 98-99 Taxes : $6,679.33 Telephone • Census . Tract : 308.02 Block ' 3 MMapGrid: 655 G6 RefPar# : 2S112AC 00700 Bedrm - Bth ; YB : Gar: Pool. BldgSF: Ac: 86 #35 — Owner • Bhk Properties Lie Parcel • R0511100 Site : 14645 SW 74Th Ave Ti 97224 01.A.? r Xfered : 01/13/1997 Mail • 14280 SW 72Nd A ' igard Or 97224 Price $2,050,000 Use : 3012 Ind,Impr .1M1ktTot . $113,340 Legal : ACRES . 98-99 Taxes • $1,693.06 Telephone . Census : ' act • 308.02 Block 3 MapGrid: 655 G6 RefPar# ' 2S112AC 00800 Bedrm : Bth : YB : Gar: Pool : BldgSF: Ac . .96 #36 Owner • Pacific Realty Associates 1 Parcel : R0511182 Site : 14860 SW 74Th Ave Tigar. 224 ` Xfered : 10/06/1989 Mat! . 15350 SW Sequoia P #300-Wm Portland Or 97224 Price ' $262,682 Use • 2312 Misc,Non-• ,'g,Improvcment,Ind Zone ictTot . $832,220 Legal :fANNO C' - K ACRE TRACTS, LOT 21,PT 98-99 Taxes : S12,431.63 22, AC:-'S 1.64 Telephone • Census Trap : 308.02 Block 3 MapGrtd. 655 G6 RefPark • 2S112AC 01100 .Bedrm • Bth : Y8 : Gar. Pool : BldgSF. Ac : 1.64 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not( uarameed. 4 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAM (CIT)_ SUBCOMMITTEES EST; Glir .*:."; ' ti40. " S ., CHIT l$k ;� i 4 t,SOUTH-clT . .4-, rs.. Flr... -,�) . { : L-------- V .. ,_.,. .._ Ed & Fran Egan Naomi Gallucci Sally Christensen Debra Seeman 14635 SW Bull Mountain Road 11285 SW 78th Avenue 15685 SW 76th Avenue 13372 SW Clearview Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Earl & Marilyn Elias Sue Rorman Mary Ann Melvin Mary Skelton 13540 SW Village Glenn Drive 11250 SW 82nd Avenue 10395 SW Bonanza Way 10355 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Minor Stephen Bicker 14210 SW Windsong Court 14235 SW 97th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Paul E. Owen Mark Bogert 10335 SW Highland Drive 14445 SW 100th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Beverly Froude Twyla Brady 12200 SW Bull Mountain Road 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Smelter Debra Muir 14900 SW 103`d Avenue 15065 SW 79th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Joan Best Sue Sieboid 10705 SW Murdock Ln, #F2 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Kathy Palmer Tim Esav c/o John Tigard House PO Box 230695 14260 SW High Tor Dr. Tigard, OR 97281 Tigard, OR 97224 PLEASE NOTE: In addition to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all names on this list. I:\cure In\masters\revlsed\cItnotic.m st goposalgarrcfrit/e.. January 14, 2000 (Revised March 3, 2000) Site Design Review Application for 7320 SW Bonita Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development includes (2) new buildings providing 19,166 square feet of light industrial space along with the addition of 44 additional parking spaces, a new driveway, improvements to the landscaping, a storm water quality facility and related improvements. The existing building and grounds are in need of maintenance. The proposal will include partitioning the existing tax lot into (2) parcels. The development will require a reciprocal access agreement for circulation around the exiting building. PROPOSED USE The building will be leased to tenants for any use allowed by the City of Tigard I-L zoning. The uses will be compatible with the uses on the adjacent properties and there were not any negative comments from the affected neighbors or any members of the Tigard Community Involvement Teams, which were contacted for the Public Meeting held on October 11 , 1999. This application is being submitted for a Site Development Review and Type II Land Partition in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.360 of the "Development Code for the City of Tigard". APPROVAL CRITERIA18.120 Site Development Review The applicant has completed the Pre-Application Conference (6/15/99) and the required Neighborhood Meeting (9/11/99) as required prior to the Site Development Review Application. The application includes the existing site plan and the Site Development Plan along with the preliminary architectural floor plan and building elevations. Please contact John Boutinen at Engineered Structures, Inc (968-3118) regarding any questions on the proposed project. APPROVAL CRITERIA18.120 Site Development Review 1. The proposed project has addressed the requirements of Chapter 18.800. 2. The buildings are located to utilize the exiting topography and drainage and preserve the (1 ) exiting significant tree. The area within 50' of Ball Creek or the wetland identified in the Wetlland Delineation prepared by Schott and Associates will not be developed. Adequate building separation is provided for access, fire control, air circulation and solar access. 3. Not applicable. 4. The project site is surrounded by industrially zoned properties, which are similar in their scale of development and uses. The new development will have a 50' wide buffer to the south and is set back more than 150' from Bonita Road. 5. Not applicable. 6. Not applicable. 7. Not applicable. 8. The City of Tigard has not advised us of any plans for a path along Ball Creek and this proposal does not include any dedications along Ball Creek. Ball Creek terminates in a culvert at both SW 72 and at the Southern Pacific Railroad. 9. The public access is defined by the proposed landscaping, walkways, driveways and parking areas. 10.The building mounted exterior lighting will provide the required lighting levels for the parking areas. The mailboxes will be located on the site in a highly visible area. 11.There are no plans for a transit facility on this site. Access to existing public transit stops is via the exiting public sidewalks on SW Bonita and SW 72nd 12.The proposed landscaping exceeds the requirements for the Light Industrial District. 13.The storm water drainage is designed to meet the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency and includes a storm water quality facility. 14.The proposed project is designed to provided access for the disabled and to meet the access requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 15.The project has been designed to meet the provisions and regulations of the "Development Code" for the City of Tigard. CODE CRITERIA 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments The proposed project requires a Type II Land Partition be approved by the City of Tigard. The proposed partition will create (2) lots. The new lot will meet the development standards for the Light Industrial Zone. The existing (developed) lot will meet the development standards for the Light Industrial Zone, except for the existing non-conforming front setback and landscaping. (The non-conforming conditions are a result of the public street widening project.) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts The proposed project meets the goals for the Light Industrial District at noted in Section 18.530.020 B. The proposed new development complies with the development standards contained in Table 18.530.2. 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation The project is designed to meet the requirements of 18.705.030,1. The project includes eliminating (1 ) existing driveway access which serve the existing building and combining the access onto (1) common driveway with a reciprocal access agreement. The traffic flow north of the exiting building will be limited to (1) direction due to the existing non-conforming front setback condition. 18.745 Landscaping and Screening The proposed landscaping and natural areas for the entire site will exceed the 15% area requirements of the IL District and the requirements of 18.745. A new landscape irrigation system will be installed for the new planting areas (except the storm water quality pond and the hydro-seeded bank area). The site plan illustrates the landscaping improvements. The new trees on site shall have a minimum caliper of 2", (measured 4' in height). There aren't any required buffers for this site, but a 50' wide streamside riparian setback will remain along Ball Creek. An erosion control plan in compliance with the Unified Sewer Agency The new solid waste and recycling enclosures shall be screened by a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 18.760 Non-conforming Situations The existing building has a non-conforming front setback and landscaping. At the time of development, the project did conform to the existing standards. The non-conforming setback is a result of the widening of SW Bonita Road. The proposed project will not increase the non-conformity. 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste The local franchised hauler (Pride Disposal) has reviewed the site plan and approved the enclosures as located on drawing A-1. The enclosures will be screened with a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 18.765 Off Street Parking and Loading The Site Development Plan allows for the required off street parking and loading to meet or exceed the requirements of Chapter 18.106, as per the following calculations. New Parking Required 19,166 square feet of proposed building. 1.6 parking spaces required per 1 ,000 square feet of new building. 31 new spaces required. 44 new spaces provided. New Bicycle Parking Required 19,166 square feet of proposed building. .1 bicycle spaces required per 1 ,000 square feet of new building. 2 bicycle spaces required. 6 bicycle spaces provided. 18.775 Sensitive Lands The site contains a wetland area at the southwest corner near the culvert under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and near the southeast corner. Ball Creek then leaves the site and runs eastward towards SW 72nd. A 50' streamside buffer is maintained to avoid any development on sensitive lands except for a single stormwater outlfall from the water quality pond. 18.775.020A.9. The stormwater outfall work is an outright permitted use with no permit required. The stormwater outfall work involves less than 10 yards of material (alteration) for the trenching, backfill and rock riprap. The trenching will done with a 2' bucket and involve (5-7) yards of native material. The native material will be used to backfill the trench and natural grasses will be seeded over this area. The rock riprap will consist of (1) yard Class 50 riprap (approx. 50# rock). The riprap is designed to dissipate the energy of the stormwater discharge in order to minimize the potential for erosion. 18.780 Signs The proposed project includes a new lighted, commercial sign. A drawing is included. The sign will be located 25' behind the public sidewalk and mounted at an elevation that will not interfere with the visual clearance requirements of Section 18.795. The required signage will be installed for the ADA accessible parking spaces and no parking signs will be installed on the trash enclosure gate. The one way exit driveway along the north side of the existing building will be marked with directional arrows and a sign. 18.168 I-L Light Industrial District The proposal is consistent with the allowable uses and requirements of the IL District. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas The proposed project will include a new 24' wide driveway and enter onto SW Bonita Road. The Visual Clearance Area requirements have been considered in the design of the proposed improvements to the site. 18.790 Tree Removal The Existing Conditions plan indicates that the only existing tree with a caliper of 6" or more is a 10" Alder. That tree will remain. The remainder of the site is presently covered with a mixture of bushy vegetation, grass, blackberries and small trees. The entire site has been cleared previously. The existing ground cover will be removed in the areas to be developed. The 50' wide corridor as shown along Ball Creek will remain unchanged. A minimum of (10) new 2" caliper trees will be added. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas The proposed project will include a new 24' wide driveway and enter onto SW Bonita Road. The Visual Clearance Area requirements have been considered the proposed improvements to the site. 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards The proposed development will require the abandonment of (1) exiting driveway. (See the "Pre-application" notes by Brian Rager.) A new sanitary sewer connection will also be required for the new tax lot. New water meters will need to be installed for the new buildings. As a result, a Street Opening permit will be required for this project. 18.885.00 Water Resources (WR) Overlay District The WR Overlay District is applicable to the portion of the site that is within 50' of the top of the bank of Ball Creek. Ball Creek is considered a major stream by the Oregon Department of Forestry and a 50' riparian setback is provided as required by 18.797.020 A. 2. b. The 50' streamside buffer has been noted on the plans and will be staked prior to construction. The only development activity within the buffer will be to install an 8" outfall pipe from the water quality pond to Ball Creek. The outfall pipe will discharge onto Class 50 rock in order to dissipate the energy of the storm water to minimize the potential for erosion. The Division of State Lands (Mr. Bill Parks) has been notified with a letter and he has been forwarded a set of plans. The work within the 50' buffer will involve the excavation of less than 10 yards of material, which is less than the 50 cubic yards allowed before a DSL permit is typically required. Mr. Parks has stated that DSL will review our submittal and issue comments the project. The standards of the Unified Sewerage Agency will be met and detailed plans will be submitted to the City of Tigard for approval as part of the building permit application process. The outfall is similar in nature (and will have a lesser long term impact) to the regulated procedure listed in Table 18.797.2 1 . c) "Irrigation Pumps". That use is listed as a Type 1 Procedure. After installation of the 8" outfall pipe, the ditch will be filled with the native soil that was excavated from the ditch and planted with native grasses. (See Sheet A-1 for information on the outfall work.) The work will be completed will be completed with a trackhoe and 2' wide bucket. The trackhoe will remain more than 10' from the edge of Ball Creek and extend the bucket to complete the required work. The work within 50' of the stream is anticipated to be completed within day. Erosion control measures will include the use of straw bales, bio-bags and sediment fence as required to protect against sediment run-off and to meet the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. As required for a Type 1 Procedure we are providing a site survey, a grading plan (C1) and copies of the wetland delineation for the site. The wetland delineation includes a vegetation report, hydrology report and soil determination. IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT Air Quality — The possible increase in vehicular traffic will have a slight (insignificant) impact on the local air quality. To mitigate this, occupants and users of the building may select to walk, bicycle, car pool or ride TriMet. Water Quality — The storm water run off will increase due to the increase in impervious area on the under-developed site but the post development run-off will not exceed the pre-development peak run-off due to the on site detention facility. The additional storm water from the new parking and circulation areas will be collected on the site as required by the City of Tigard standards and the Unified Sewerage Agency requirements and directed to the new storm water quality facility. Traffic — The proposed project will result in an increase in daily vehicle trips to and from this site. The increase will be incremental and should have a minimal impact on SW Bonita Road. The consolidation of the (2) existing driveway aprons will improve the ingress and egress from the sight. Pedestrian Access Public sidewalks exist on both sides of SW Bonita Road. A new pedestrian walkway will be extended to the public sidewalk on the south side of Bonita Road to the new buildings, as part of the proposed project. Light and Glare The proposed facility will include new HPS exterior wall packs on the exteriors of the new buildings. The building mounted exterior lighting will provide parking lot lighting between the new buildings and along the driveway on the west side of the exiting building. The north side of the existing building is well light by the existing street lighting along Bonita Road. The exterior lighting will comply with the City of Tigard standards for outdoor lighting and the impact to the surrounding industrial properties will be insignificant. Public Services The site is currently served with public water, sewer, storm sewer, telephone, cable television and natural gas. The proposed improvements will be served by the same service providers. The site is currently protected by the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and the City of Tigard Police Department. Two new fire hydrants will be provided on the site. The proposed building addition will not require any increase in the level of service required for police and fire protection. Public transportation is provided along SW 72nd with public sidewalks linking the bus stops to the site. The public agency is actively encouraging additional ridership. GeoTaJ iapo rt FEB-17-00 02 : 18 PM LEWIS & VAN VLEET INC. 503 °5351206 P. 02 LEWIS & Consulting englneers Job -r7PiP-. -�______ ..._ -•;441:. Wfif in 4.w. nounet,fr m.,rudU ,�,.a Client �__---____ n,d6,tir r. crew t 970b2 f°;11•l)F3Oa.86U5 fU nuu• [909j Q8s.120Eo rnx Job No. 93 333___ By... V Jt— VAN VLEET Date /2 1 11 Sheet No. i . ST)?-11 W 11NT ER_ Cr∎Ltu.L `Ct0■JS -roptL. s r -ecf■ = gO ,415 54 Z.07 b 0.r:) f 4r/tr,u4 r.cJzvrvu5 Munk = 19, 335 34" • /3'�fiwruc, : /4,38s s-F r = 1, 650 s$ • N 1 r`P ,zvio u s Atz 6A = ••=t 8 b t. s f (4z.(00 6.G) Sitil--bro1/4)0, _ ic1,1Co{O 5- V • Th.,./Gil r=1JT = 3 "„-7 0 0 5 f 1 s I "fc m:Pir-o � A InP, -ems = 7 4 zo 1 s f (l.-7 0 3 4 c) t 1 /3t.A1� )AiGS = 33, 55/ s4 PPM, -t l.J r =. .off G i a ,5-c .1 t 1 J VG..-IL uCUJEg_t"T"."1 Qe=:;.6 W Q tlo.,,.r e_ (0.03F�(T1c,,..) Ili?, Aar.) = (0,030 5418c.4) - I, L50 cc . i • 4$ lluvttx -1-,e_ rcFtJr O t-C • • • - C9,00 q 5 C�S E L ,E Mkt E ( S r >(,orhc\(rpe/ss) \Ia.urie 7t-N40v t r C+-e 4(•4 i'l-evi, CSO \lot..0 ri k. (CC) ) I. l9 \ 110 1,.� 56,0 ��5 3'1 0 A L 5 Tv�,.. J uN,ru. = \,la-7 5 C-c l34 .L30 00 764� =-- \ DSO a f 7 \ I'D 13 1 % 0 - �5 We±Ic&nc(s PeWnecCfiovi and M flan Y I A P. \ � R U I I I) I N I \ c t I I u c I c t N E v iaa ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. o 0 0 Q AGE Feb. 29, 2000 Mr. Bill Parks Division of State Lands 775 Summer Street N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-1279 Dear Mr. Parks, We are proposing a development in the City of Tigard, Oregon. As part of the Site Design Review process, we are required to notify the Division of State Lands of any action within the "Water Resources Overlay District". This project is adjacent to Ball Creek, which according to the City of Tigard, is classified as a "Major stream"and a"fish bearing stream"with a flow of less than 1,000 CFS, by the Oregon Department of Forestry. Ball Creek continues downstream(through an existing culvert under the SPRR tracks) to Fanno Creek. Proposed Action within the 50' Riparian Setback from Ball Creek. 1. Install (1) 8"outfall to Ball Creek from the proposed stormwater quality pond. The work will involve less than 50 LF of 2' wide trench with an 8" diameter pipe and approximately(1)yard of Class 50 riprap to dissipate the energy of the outflow and protect against erosion. The outflow will terminate at elevation 135.0, which is above the 100 year floodplain elevation of 134.0. The trench will be backfilled with the native soil and seeded with native grasses. The proposed peak discharge to Ball Creek should not exceed the current runoff from the sit, as it currently exists. The discharge outlet is designed and located to minimize erosion of the streamside. The area where the proposed will be completed shows evidence of being previously disturbed. The vegetation is a mixture of Himalayan blackberry, colonial bentgrass, chickory, Canadian thistle and some reed canary grass. (See "Wetland Delineation for Empire Battery", December 1999.) Please contact either myself or Kim McMillan(503-885-8605 our Civil Engineer) to discuss any questions or concerns that you may have about this project. Sincerely. /John Boutinen Project Manager Enclosures: "Wetland Delineation" Sheets Cl and C2. Phone: 503.968.31 18 • Fax: 503.968.5639 7360 SW Hunziker Road. Suite 101 - Tigard. OR 97 22 3-2 305 • Web Site:wwweaigc.com • CC8#103693 SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES 1 Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists 11977 S. Toliver Rd. • Molalla, OR 97038 • (503) 829-6318 • FAX: (503) 829-3874 WETLAND DELINEATION for EMPIRE BAT'T'ERY prepared for: Engineered Structure, Inc. prepared by: Martin R. Schott, Ph.D. December, 1999 INTRODUCTION The 1.87 acre site is located off S.W. Bonita, Tigard, Oregon (Tax Lot 300, T2S, RI W, Sec. 12AC) (Figure 1). Ball creek forms the southern boundary, Railroad tracks forms the western boundary and S.W. Bonita forms the northern boundary. There is an existing building on the front portion of the property, with associated parking. The area behind the building has been used for storage. There is old fill material above the flood plain of Ball Creek. The fill material has a dense cover of Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor). Further down the slope Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra) and red-osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera) forms the riparian community. Himalayan blackberry forms a dense understory under the willows and dogwoods. The surrounding property has all be developed for industrial uses. The topography of the site is nearly flat, except where it approaches the creek. The slopes adjacent to the creek are moderate to steep. The site drains to the south. METHODS The wetlands on the site were delineated using the method described in the 1987 wetland delineation manual developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. RESULTS Review of the available literature indicated the potential for wetlands on the site. The National Wetland Inventory(NWI) indicated a scrub-shrub wetland along Ball Creek. The Washington County Soil Survey(1982) identified a hydric soil (Wapato) along the creek. A wetland delineation site visit was conducted in November, 1999. Vegetation The area behind the building is dominated by weedy herbaceous species and Himalayan blackberry. This area appears to have been used for storage, and then somewhat abandoned. Its weedy nature is typical of areas which used to be used, and then left mostly alone. Some of the area has been kept mowed, which was probably to reduce the fire hazard. The weedy species include colonial bentgrass(Agrostis tenusis), chickory (Cichorium intybus), Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) and Canadian thistle(Circium arvense). Himalayan blackberry is starting to dominate much of the site. It is particularly thick on the old fill material located just to the north of the Ball Creek floodplain. It extends down the embankment to the creek edge. There are Pacific willow and some red-osier dogwoods in the narrow floodplain of the creek. There is a small patch of reed canary grass (phalaris arundinacea) in the southeast corner of the site. • SW 8- - m 1 0•T• L 1 ST ' SW VERTU-, VENTU w 606 ,,r �� i SW 'LANDAU - ' ST 11 9. I,_ : 1ii-,, d s* cr MINER .-I SQ CD _ 9000 -', _ PL.� ST ''�^ S w. c,:,rr OR bg` ,r`' f SW .... _-. .._ MAPLELEAF ST o I I - 1 1 p. .ENw s SW OAK '� ST _ao SW � Si OAK ST : `ccrr GMs' t A dE ',f> 9000 s I v) - I e a. IF Iw[ ALAI •plt���Ct` -SW b `^ PINE ^ ® //ice ISN r- �l1� _ 3 ewe, 7soc = 7000 Wy SW CA‘ <<� Ste" i A ___ - ..SW N - SPRUCE �' �!ST �,��°s �� _ �� ,'Y .SN THORN _ ' TMORH Sw 7 pL o a E , r d. • SW \ ST = < < 4i \ h .,A • a„ A LINGSTAF �, 44, '�. ua 99W 31 dI c+7 v7 J LESSER 1 ,� ���� ! w, _„ 9O m !a Q `600 1 / - a �QU 1, �' aS a' s A FSSER A E < A cn a a < SW PFAFFLEB� , �J. a'ARK a 36 =� sw�Al $ a PK f A _ RIDE . AT NTA Sr 1 SW HAINES S 6000,1111 --it SN LEWIS ll',r •G S PNitA s), I £ ^ SW BAY /' < ST = a LN z T u ST \\%\.'-\11111 �i 7000 i s3, CV!NI 1` _4 1 � rn rexGEU a 1,4!l ''9 09 ::1 E► t' hM:.a a r1 L l R1,' , 11 o^ s _ - ••• 1 '+..cP ,way_ JCO m \I t. :EL T1�III I :. • KN y�Y SW HERMOSO ' J !W cR 4�C �Q *$�® SW BEYELAl/0 SW STI o• w C J' M51, P ST x , SW SOUTHW0c. at. J� uLs. . fir 7200 _ DR v. 'Glwm OAKS 6 II 6 'W ` BGQ �P' SEE A H3UN IkFR ��\ 6 N SW GONZAGA n1 ' g s col- - Of; ' QS' : . 1 sW 60TH CLR \ SW NAMPT■ ST ( N s m 7 Sl J FS 2 Sw SRTH CIR ST 7000 ` N p 'p'` �` 4p P.• 6^\\ A SN � �.' .1: PANE _" S - _ k CRESTVIEW� `wetki,:,,,,,,," SW a VAR72 ��'ti _ 'FANNO C E. .. y� TEwr..'.'.;' ,., Ili 7200 j s+ W SW FIR 41°r9 ' ! I a� " v= s © 217 LA g ::s SW 6I1 A �. SW CHERRY DR$NDBURG \ 4 , ,g4� EDG M ST IL ow - \ SW TECH CENTER KHLYIEW S R C RUS-� EEAIN R DR 9700=MINN r.+.+. - —..--fit- �_ Loess 5r g SW ELROSE C0i .c'ciK i t LN -MEADOWS-ow CT Fume'; 0 ii, -'yr y\ r' ` �[ 404 TER s` Sw CFII, „ .. w ro'ect Area , -�. - 9 T. +r rn SW W Ez a a� SW INS at !• ' . BONITA ■ 'F ■ :6;;1j11'/' 4 -K ST g- 9300 < a PIKBROOK r - _� 8000 . ;.,§ 000 : _ -i:, 6001 _ n 0. .� 1 MID g�„ QA.. !. ,,4 , ■ "1 ,c 0 e I,\ I R4 •, 1 _ 0 I tai, 11 e^, a ST x sr < t 1 ,,c•, •S (� M 'I B•,E E K m 4': �.,.`r""°L ^ i Q s *1 sw NEl Ol Cr d •x J g . y\ N W BURMA= RD 8 11 3 — m a rn '" ^ '� �� SU, P;ARi RD s \4 SW LESLIE CT SW REIL ., U �: CT G ^ SW INAL :j _ _ - dJ71EL CT SN � _.__ EW w , r,.. - c . .,'..- ��,pP�� -"r/.."! • M E�II� SW ROSS sW it / x 4,I 1f t' z, '<' `<::;-.4'1 2 ST8100 s _ r- Q E Ir., 3 a- SUNERFIELO h 8500 SZ y a n "SW �i, . sk o 7 i u IDEa .cl J —sit KENTON OR 1• II 12 SW III c'7�..�.- a:1670: [ >:1 Rvs�°s�LI a s S ' oai ® ® ,,, KABLE IN 1> .RR, INTO 8; , 3 7900 ASHFd20 LN C� I H_ARRI11 \N_^'" ��a z'1 4% ,to LN „,, �:-c, eNFi(A�CAdg F' ai < .: g 0 �,1 <• gg _.•�. 71 41tti - iw a3" I ., _ i .�Wiv SEri. �.! Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map • Soils Three soil series are mapped in the vicinity of the project area; Wapato, Quatama and Hillsboro (Figure 2). Only the Wapato series is listed as a hydric soil. This soil was mapped adjacent to Ball Creek. The site visit confirmed the presence of Wapato soils in this area. The soil had a color of 10YR 3/1-2 and was mottled at a depth of 8 inches (10YR 3/4). The hydrology of the site is partially associated with Ball Creek. However, most of the site is above the 100 year floodplain, and does not have any wetland hydrology. In fact, most of the floodplain does not have wetland hydrology. The only area above the normal high water mark of the creek which had wetland hydrology is associated with a drainage ditch the property to the east. The ditch empties out onto the floodplain, where there is a slight depression. This area appears to have saturated to inundated conditions during wet periods. The rest of the floodplain has no indicators of wetland hydrology. This is due, in part, by the incised condition of the creek, which is significantly down cut. Wetland Determination There is one area in the southeast corner of the site which has indicators of all three wetland criteria(Plot 1) (Figure 3). The soils match the description of the Wapato series. They have a low matrix chroma(1-2) and are mottled (10YR 3/4). The hydrology is provided by a drainage ditch, and a depression. This depressional area appears to have inundated to saturated conditions during wet weather. Finally, the vegetation is dominated by reed canary grass. The wetland is approximately 0.12 acres, and is classified as emergent. The rest of the flood plain area is dominated by Pacific willows and Himalayan blackberry (Plot 2). The soils in this area has a matrix chroma of 10YR 3/2 and is not mottled. There is no evidence of wetland hydrology. The area above the 100 year floodplain was verified as having the Quatama soils series. The soil color was 10YR 4/3 (Plot 3). The vegetation was dominated by weedy species; Himalayan blackberry, colonial bentgrass, chickory and Canadian thistle. There was no indicators of wetland hydrology. Yr .., I• •4._•* k i•-i'(p'..r.nll'•• I.' °•'k'•;::,..,.,..,' ,. ;• ar - Th,..,,..4...., •tI:. •.'.&.i2.4...t., ... • ,, .. go;ify.----,-,.. sTF. t" 0 - -.. %•• , 11 '\ . — ;11 / '1 — —4— ...■7-4r -4- vrc,_- • 4 --.t.. , . l. tlfill'ir' ''1`"'"" --"" ,,,, ,' . •., ..... .,....1 . ••- ,IV ...1 " •••••11 .,. .iiii -•vp 4'•? 4111,1 '6 .;•s.... Project Area , c, , - .`" tiv ^.:."‘,1_141$ i 'IV /d''''' rN -/-'t •• .nri--7-• 0.A.!‘-- ., .--- 1 il . . r.s.At'...',-f.4, ,41-.. ...,... •- -.,c.:.et - _1 ' - "- "41410' - ."1 ' i • PI' 1,....0 4„„*40c --f. .-. •A _.orst pi,,,•;. • 4 _ . • • ' , ,• f;.". ill . . ' I: •'.'- ■r t -4 1,1 7 - ' . i ...INT-.fr• •.. ,S4t •-• •• - ...001:6* •••• .'..'d ••'.: ' . .it i 1, t. ;.••• .,•I',' -.- 'lit .. : - ...‘ &-•••,• :- - -.-.- .„,, . . • . . . . .. .._ .,,,..-: • . ...--.-,.... S t,','/;,1;;‘,.....TS: • ,• 'J.!, • `..* i ' %. . 'a! . r• , .... 1 j ' •-.. ,-.. . r .--'• , , ,L. it..,•?..-....„. ---.. . 1 , ,:,•:- = .......t - ---. i ..7 re . ...1 i - - .4 ' • .K.:-.4- . . -" u ,,..- ihi • /,, I ..--- - , , . ,.• a .L.c.„1_,.1 .. Ir.; . • (..-044,7- ,0 0 '0-. IV4 f„ - rr..i0i .:sr..--•,.-- li VI .'plir - -•!..- ';--•- •,..-1 . ; i , •. •••• • .4:- 1 t • t:- •..1(.1 it ,Milif... .. .. *._.:;".1"1: • ..,'' ' "17 trr r -*:' Ir.! t.f '".-'N 1. 4 0 1 .. - ' '% Wt.••' , .HP I ' 0.4.0. . , ,-!V■ •l 41% 14.,, . .„ ilr!;7177' -: ' ,.. 1 1,, , „2.e, •moo 1 , 1 . $ , . , - . litt. ;.74.,..:, ,,E, it:.1._ . . '• - , •./ • -.14-= ..,47-••• • r • ..,, r ' ..1,--ci. .,-, .,----:•-•.--7-- - .,. -,.,. ,. , • 1 .1 ... .00 .4a • 0 it.1,. ...,'4. 1.7'1 " ' et.,, ,,,,. '.•,...1,.. .; • g ',°91v ,i, . -:.- i.....e.,, t -.--;•••• ".,/,/,;/......,-..—,,..r4 •.,1 : 'i'' ,i''',„4.-:., -riSr.`-' 41*, ' ' ,- . !. . P I - ', . *, ..rfekA:P 400, ' ,.• %."-41*.i , ''- •-- ,4114 , , ; •,.._...,„.! . • ''ili.', '.' 1 . — --- --.-- ---,.. ' ..t. /...'''• i'.7"-:/,••.:7-',..i-- 4,:l •-'' - - ',' - , ,...,.::,, . .i....,,,_.......,...>:•.::-........,_-__:?„.1 ,., -W--,,i' , '' a. ""•-•.„ ‘aa- ---. 1, . . ,. \ ..• 7 ._... a*, • i'■ ra.'f47,-• ' - , ' V.ea,1 .1 a aa.' ', l'. :1 r. AL' .1.. f ;'. i 1 , .*•._, s. ,,... .... •,-r,,,,:..1;,4',,t.. • . ,.,1,1, • , ..7 ,-". 11.' ',i'l • -1--- - ro :.•44;,Ft•-:''';',... -..1;4111 ,1,. I-.), -:„; .''-,,, - ' „ ?;- va-,. ,<-• • , 1,•42- t i . I :..1.--3,S. E , .10.1%;'kt. ''■ ;, ....oz.% . .-•-e:'6, - %' . -4.,:tr,::: .,t.., . ; ,, :r , .. . . g -.kW., , LW ,..4 7...1 1 1 , 1'ortr.ly i•.. •[ ! ,1%..,,,'• ,-,2-;-.. ,,?...-...t'.. ., ,, ....,. ..: , ...1.1 ...40“ . /1,01,• i ; 1, 4 .••-.,'_4'..."06-.0.,,,,;] ` ' -,,i,..°, .. '0. 'V oi.1' :a„,____-002011-.:' ..,..; 1...' :,' =0 ''',;,::, i .71),.."••• 1 . r.-•1 or- urt si4, .,.. ,,. 1: .:.,_,. _ ., ,,,,/%%. .1. 4,11. , .-1 '.. I ',•„‘r-: • •' ,,,-:-..:.,,,-,,': -I -;/q.' 1,1 , II;'t! • ' :°:.• • . - ° • ;'''.-, ; i • -• f° 7;,,i' '' ' . ' ill,: II -44%..-: ' ' f- `'• - " - -'i 11'Ali .' ;..,.1.' . ...:: I .. . 01..,. L. 11%.,- 6 1 -4 e-6-'••; ^, " s , '11-1 0,4. , .;:/.47....-- t‘:,,,.‘....11..;4hi, , •0 , - .., k e. .:.-. ./'5'. • IP 41 , r : .-■ ‘. '. 2,W .1.4.., • ••: . P....L.1 1.• • ' t, i. • '4 ..S, 4\1 t ' . ..' : • '.- lit, S. h' ' '1 ' • .1 I.'7'4,1 1 ,:t ,:,-7 :4 ' ' ' 1 / • ', '. ;I—'2' irto 1 .2"1, , : --.;::P.;,m....,' it ,. , „, 1,,,,. r •0,:*tie 4. a I •■•• • — 011.1t , — ,.•.: .1 ;_,:' ` ._• . ' • 1 • ,z- . - e . . IN. .. t , • • , A 1 .:, : •,, . , _ . a. w : ; -. 1. ...,-1. . • . , =, ..... ,. . , 1 .1. qv - • k ., -,. , ,-,./. -....-....i - . i. . - ..,.... .• ... - .4.„, f ..:-/s''IP'g* ...404' .• ° "..' ... I. a (47. '' ' ,. ip, . t 4. I •: - 4 • . ' Iv r • . . .;..,•`..-. ; -1. --.... ., , p, • :is „.iiigist. I ,. ,.,, ,-T-, , , .:,, ... , t.,,,.• . ...• ..):r,_ J . ,i4 - , - -, ,/ ---,-.-:-., . ..• , 1- .s 11504r L, , ,... -. ..v.t,1 •g• ,A ._..-_ -I . / . 4.* ) ....■ a." / ,w!. ■•• - a•... t • u* ....--- ; ,--. —,016I , --- , t., • ; ti 00 • -* I • ; i ° . y: •,_ 414,'• .'.-4 :..- !. ,. , i • 21D , ,..- • i 5B , ,,.' . •ff• I -I- ... f ,...4 °°.. _ 1. 1 ?.. u '''''' • '4 k:IIIL „.:*,:rf,11(12:•lier,: , • 43 - id,,-.-.ire' I -NX ..e •a''' tii i".. .•/,'. , . .„Ir ) • / Al .. . . . f r / .-.1.,..,1: 1,-,.,ft.,,., ,, ,I -e. 4 : '-. IVER p k . 4 . . i. , , ,, •-,,,1„ . .. •- • I. .IA.- , ' •■• • V . • . ._ Figure 2. Soil Map. 43 Wapato 37B Quatama I 0 TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY Se / of 2_0' FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 12, T.2S., R1W., W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AUGUST 21, 1998 REVISED: OCTOBER 19, 1999 REVISED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 \ °\ ....,,,,,,... X147.854C ME7UND fI.r1 s i NG——�r� POINT SET BY OTHERS XI47.67Fi1C 1 GRNDX / / 1/2 1.R. --_ UP 0.2' L 138 4GRND \ \� C \ � NOTE: \ J ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF TIGARD, THE AREA EAST OF 72nd AVENUE IS NOT IN THE 100 YEAR �_'D FLOOD PLAIN. THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ON THE WEST SIDE OF 72nd AVENUE IS 134.00'. \ •J FEMA PANEL # IS 4102 76 00058 DATED MARCH x14a 4GRND t() "-.1r.4 1, 1982 NN\ \ • Sa, 7-- N \ J xi 45.6GRt (r \ - '--�\ X144.JGRND �.147tN0 O X146.9GRND NO ELEVATION lb. DATA AVAILABLE X146.7GRND DUE TO BRUSH JD 143.9GRNO / _ 1 A-7 —� / 1JZOGRND '� ,i X 147.I CRND / 1 '� ] l 1 . of �}I- 1 VP X146.9GRND /\ �� ,.... `�! ,rND — /�148.10RH0 EDGE OF ,3S '3 I / WATER ( 148 / "/ X 1 J7.2GRND 'Xt49.OQRND� '.iGRrID -�— X 146.8GRND 2613' / A90 BC NOTES: ` " .?6 Gkt/.J/9 scRr:D 1. ELEVATIONS ARE ON OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR TA DONS DATUM FROM BENCH MARK NO. Y-67 SET IN 1976, A 3' BRASS DISK. 2. THE BOUNDARIES AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY TO BE RECORDED, BUT WAS DONE FOR SITE/TOPO INFORMATION ONLY .T. THIS 411RUFY lc AA4nr 1'n0 Ti-ir norrv0.,At nr'Dr.ur rrn .,r• ., r- - . -. .. .. TOPOGRAPHIC/SfTE SURVEY FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES. INC. SuPVF.•fED AY: • ANDY S AND ASSOCIATES,►C BEING TAX PAT 300, TAX MAP 23 1 1 AC 15967 BOONES TERRY ROAD LANE. OSW.O. OREGON 97035-4351 171 THE IfE i/4, 380. 12. T.23.. R,14., VAL PH. R3F-3341 CITY OF TIG WA3ffiNGTON COUNTY, OREGON AUGUST 21. 1998 ,.....,7 REVISED: OCTG8ER 19, 1999 REVISED: N©WASEA 17. 1•f M t rt'•' ��t /la•rE Or UE1fs }PONT SET NIM-DAVNIM •ISM NNW? reba J/71.R r„Mr w a1'nftl a ASP MAN now MAC ,4 fY[Y 3e2.ee' 'L• NETT S 0079'00'E .. • O•7/b0-ir fKd1STO1RD 10.00 aft' ' tAs owes PROFESSIONAL na,.• ',an* `,+,v -wam• " " NOTE, A + IS NOT ns oorL.q, EAST OF LAND SURVEYOR s/s'LHx w/YPC • tdM ttRJarare +na MRe naaw J iL000 PLAel 171E 100 7EAR M1000 Pt/4M TLUSN 171 ASPHALT .t„O[w PM PON.MN ON TIE K51 YOE OF rz^Q AVENUE 15 134.O0'. N A' I aM' w!R' 6fCNa ` TEYA PANEL/6 41 02]!MOB DATED MARC. r wY.o.a,. S 00'3COe'E .44. _t69.eY' -- 141 • >naaw �ifp \ y I.tool•OREGON is I/lPC i 11\ HAROU)P.SALO \Air N , O^OIN aY -) U.. N eO,YbO'I 11'',. D. iv.An[fn Jae 0.M' •ROe.M •`A . wi!•O N. RN)AMS'e �. 1 MI.AuR RYY / ,I/Frr ANDA.w maa. I *NAM s1.'�. (r.---- 4,. \ \ W t. • row,... <rumo, 191 1 • mar• NO ELEVATION o• u1 NO TWO arlaYe.• R.a1w• DATA AVMLABLE • Jr.a.a a DUE r0 BRUSH • r+r,i WY A noww Ammo.R,.•,S MINN pomp. LEGEND: r r,r!NON... .-•— - 1 I 1. \ ' • YOM/NEVI FOUND AS NO RD .. 4 Rt.lt3we \ 1) OM.* i-- 1 A. IRpV 1100 147 . nw.,•re LP POW PPE ` JL Ma,e.• OETLA1D WATER VRK �:. ^ y� 0(3/.EAnw () IA RP Yf PEA �/ ��• ® j�' a I De .735 GS RCMP 4 f �4� ^14R ✓' I n�s..•*MN '7. ■000 UiIUTY Psr + tti AWAe.• � p NMI lloEr PVSr ,rnnc /' roar IaJMV b1 ..we • OW ANCHOR // SC •re sow v or ELEVAIYON-MOH Gloom • a1 strswe naRRw PARCEL 2 6Ei -o- war OW 7T 3 Ie,954 50. FT. 70TAL Y.ae war EIEVADON- MP Or RAM( 40,0001: 50. FT. TO TOP 0f BANK f/ nArr SPOT newnoN-CROWD SNOT \� \\. 1\��^il\`�\ ti\\��\\\\�L\111::` 1 A9a•ts� NoTEs - • *MANN* YrNAMP'P n .s aY+tR ,Tar Eli-VAPOR nOH- /M RAOk OF 1TRRCAL d1R• ma pm / n'S.Re t. ELEVATIONS ARE ON OREGON DEPMMEMr or TRANSPM ri nO/s DAMN lAON •MR YAM!NO. r-87 SET It Wt.A S'WW1 DESK. f T. TOE OOIRFAME3 AS SNOW ON MS MAP ARE APP►0RYAR Mt It MS YAP DOTS NOT RTMITSTRI A RAW*.YO K RES,OACET,•III WAS DOME!V" • ry NR1MR Yawn �'�` 1 RT/ro°NIORYATOH CNow • fA„r;' ~�--.-_^ 3/*f..R W/t'PC — 3 TM.S SCMKY ISYAOC HT now MORAL PURGMA;IP or RKSJRKr PAY *AMR CARULL FLI 121' AI+U1 PARS•ASSSOA1C;INC..4tT5MT 717 l'AP'::T0 TTN 110 1NATON •Y.,OK ML10 raft LINT ��� a OR ICIRON Il ANY VORA*:STTJ• !e4 Y1 _ '1:1H5 Cl S_'BSY'J(+PII PURONASTRS PARCEL 1 -~I -��-�/ +� �' I S,RfKY Is ouo MP•PROM MI SEAL AND"MARNE Or St#LT Mt 41,462 SO.Fi. `/' _ ////1/ e .aJ -_� I Y �.'/ S. NOOWrt[YPC NAS IfENO A AS RlAL gL OCP7'S. SMI TY G A. OR R,.[Rr _��./ tRR'a.HA110 ANY unary 1OR I Y11V1 L STRIVE rAay .L. TOT 1 --------7------- -------- /' .L'E,d_=�rJ '�'''/ DR APPROPRIATE AGENCIES 3 145 �� e. LW LOCARON AND OR ExS)T1HCE OT MOT SE•NCE IRKS ro ME .� PROPERTY SURKYED ARE IPgMORN ANO APE NOT SNOW j • - / 7. RBSURTACE ARO EN'ARO.fHE1:TAL COtq.RInONS MIRE NOT EYARINED Cl CdISlNR(D AS A PART a IIT IS YADE___ CVNCERNMO RIC CYISIDIRMOU:07r..,srArtury,at 01TRKM L1JN/AA'(Rs i / O,R FAORJRES rtM(YAY VSE OOCVFLOPY[Ml OT 1105 mA[T.]] d MMtS SIRKE DOES NOT C FIRE EARCH Rr 9TKMR••/al''.0 n.�I�eA�� MS •PF EJOSr FASELC7ToS-. 1R'CnOMS E CW D', 1 f I AErECT/NE RI!l Or;HI v^ MAS RTE11 NA(X W M+ �` MS AmKE 10 SNOW o.'O+YA;TERS'NAB PAr•rtrLr PRE tO�/f PLUSH M AVM& S RM.W 0.33' 8A1.R w/1PC UW It ASPHALT M D GRAPHIC SCALE • 1 • (D1 YVf) • • I IAA.AV R • PFtIEC' 0••• • amid••:. Row. FIELD DATA SHEET WETLANDS DETERMINATION Field Investigators: Martin Schott Date: 11/4/99 Site ID: Empire Battery State: OR County: Sample Plot ID: 1 Normal environmental conditions at plant Community? YESX_ NO Vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology significantly disturbed? YES_ NO_X_ VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Scientific Name Common Name Stratum Indicator %Cover Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass H FACW 65 Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry V FACU 15 Salix lasiandara Pacific willow S FACW 10 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 66 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YES_X_ NO SOILS Series/phase: Wapato Is the soil on hydric soils list? Yes_X_ NO Is the soil a Histosol? YES_NO_X_ Histic epidedon present? YES NO_X_ Mottled? YES_X_ NO Gleyed? YES NO_X_ Matrix Color: 10YR 3/1-2 Mottle Colors:10YR 3/4 Is hydric soil criterion met? YES _X_ NO Soil Texture SiCL Sample Depth 10" Other hydric soil indicators: HYDROLOGY Is ground surface inundated? YES NO_X_ Surface Water depth: Is the soil saturated? YES_ NO_X_ Depth to free-standing water in soil probe hole: Is wetland hydrology criterion met? YES_X_ NO List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: _end of drainage ditch and depression JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Is the plant community a wetland? YES_X_ NO COMMENTS: FIELD DATA SHEET WETLANDS DETERMINATION Field Investigators: Martin Schott Date: 11/4/99 Site ID: Empire Battery State: OR County: Sample Plot ID: 2 Normal environmental conditions at plant Community? YESX_ NO Vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology significantly disturbed? YES NO_X VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Scientific Name Common Name Stratum Indicator %Cover Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry V FACU 65 Salix lasiandara Pacific willow S FACW 20 Polystichum munitum swordfern H FACU 1 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 50 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YES NO_X_ SOILS Series/phase: Wapato Is the soil on hydric soils list? Yes_X_NO Is the soil a Histosol? YES_NO_X_ Histic epidedon present? YES NO_X_ Mottled? YES_ NO_X_ Gleyed? YES NO_X_ Matrix Color: 10YR 3/2 Mottle Colors: Is hydric soil criterion met? YES_ NO_X_ Soil Texture SiCL Sample Depth 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None HYDROLOGY Is ground surface inundated? YES NO_X_ Surface Water depth: Is the soil saturated? YES_NO_X_ Depth to free-standing water in soil probe hole: Is wetland hydrology criterion met? YES_ NO_X_ List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: No indicators JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Is the plant community a wetland? YES_NO_X_ COMMENTS: FIELD DATA SHEET WETLANDS DETERMINATION Field Investigators: Martin Schott Date: 11/4/99 Site ID: Empire Battery State: OR County: Sample Plot ID: 3 Normal environmental conditions at plant Community? YESX_ NO Vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology significantly disturbed? YES NO_X_ VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Scientific Name Common Name Stratum Indicator %Cover Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry V FACU 25 Agrostis tenusis colonial bentgrass H FAC 30 Cichorium intybus Chickory H UPL 5 Plantago lacceolata English plantain H FACU 5 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 50 Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YES NO_X_ SOILS Series/phase: Quatama Is the soil on hydric soils list? Yes_NO_X_ Is the soil a Histosol? YES NO_X_ Histrc epidedon present? YES NO_X_ Mottled? YES NO_X_ Gleyed? YES NO_X_ Matrix Color: 1OYR 3/3 Mottle Colors: Is hydric soil criterion met? YES NO_X_ • Soil Texture SiCL Sample Depth 10" Other hydric soil indicators: None HYDROLOGY Isgrougd surface inundated? YES NO_X_ Surface Water depth: Is the soil saturated? YES_ NO_X_ Depth to free-standing water in soil probe hole: Is-wetland kydrology criterion met? YES_ NO_X_ bother frek evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: , No indicators JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATfON Is the plaint cemmur$ty a wetland? YES_NO_X_ COMMENTS: • .----• - ..•:. .. ter. • �, rvrrneA • , • . I' , ,\.. . ``.- ,•∎•Isztp• .. 1Pk. •'r •..c' ` - .r.t"°r. • I fit.• •L•f •iHtt.•,1}'1F'• I '� 11•05' . 1 li :. 1 tj p.o •.t• �J•PP•EM1Y• n` - ,, ' :, +, ti, EM Y r•1, ;•„ • t ._..._.. 1.‘" -i. ::,•. Sr -•--1 4 ,, sai▪ LA, 01 ' %', ,' I 1 I',•k✓'• . . EMIY I• ▪ PoIY' PFO- , 't • sl t ,j, i -�_--.• - ' isavitih Orr \�y.� tin :, y ' ?accvz Project Area .I' ..._ :.... Vic`-. —: : ;_:�.._ ; ti 1 ; , j p 111 . 0.,..;'... :".• 9• - t.^•_'jam- ••/_ ' 'I: JJii ,,P,,‘,. . �f'.••• •..I ,,•....;:.�'1' r c.T. .:r I••#46 Y •/^` y-7 :'; - `i, P Rlf oil !1�• ,::._.:.•li �: • l y i .:- 1--' • •PGIIXC ( �1 �' •r ;� ;-;;;WiZti` Nh I:il.•• *•";:•.:.•_ • \' ; . ' a---- -q. _• ► �� ,.V. �` �;:. ?;_', <' j ti POWKZx :� ; 4VI4Zx �.f: V>17,_ M1Y !:.v.. ..�', ;.k1,. ;I` ,, '• \\. ,.. :: 4.,,, 'I i•i• : . it • . ,,.....:.....— ''�(.;If�K!K 1 CHOW K7•h ,. - G iu t.';. / 4•- , ` _PFOIY r p(-) Lx I_' •`._�t, t' . FONt'fh�!t /-. t • It •':1 - 14 '-'''r.i. :,a t` 1: •i�f ."'• 1. 1 ')NCI K l Y• ' / B .i l • 17 t • y r 1. 1,.. ._. . .. , �' ... 1,'. . I Stu:+, ,• ♦ •? k- I f. - ?EJh' ^ fPEMIh IA ,......") 1 - • 'POwK, �, i 1 i . y 'National Wetland Inventory NESSCO SUPPLY I ,.... O 1 4 , , . •,-, ,ii. , N , ,, z, _. , ,, h J . ! • iN 1- , p, ._. _ :Q<___/--- . ---1 i ell Z 7 N 4 , , ,- N -----) 1 -- , fI? Liz tii I. 1it1 IT 1". . 1 1 \ —(5.-•,---_ ___ < o M I SCALE: JOB NUMBER: DATE r = ENGINEERED STRUCTURES INC. \��,I� - � R1�-TizY P.O. BOX 336 (503) 635-3118 \A/EST FACE O F __ LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 ��-v#7 S ), _ , I______. k ‘ \ ..... \ . &wit.. P n�,d. � RaI �A � � ,� tom. - ,. f ROAD IMMINEWI MEN I 'WNW�rrR i. , ii Wi. 500 t 1.4 2.0,84fir., ZOO ' -CAC �� k - 300-AI 73rD SW Lst1.1a ° 10 •:' illieI- $-. er-X 2 ROSe-C.4-y .I, • IM I r la.... . wale � •�' se E j ,� Fovo S g 2400 PI c t fe' 400 4.19 AG sfe �ct a .85A A� .c ago , .56 A . - - Ac. I 34_43 is _ - if V. ii- k- • a --. g isa' MU 4 At g 1000 n • MOO-MI 23-81 sza• ----•—••— _.. . at 2i E1sr Sinrsf��s�• - - • - --• - ---- - -- — - - - ..t TOPOORAPFIC/EITE SURVEY ILINVEKLI or KR INONEI RED S MC IVRES,INC. MDT PIMA APO A•BOOATEK DIC 'SOU KOSS MANY WOAD BEING TAX LOT 900 TAX MAP 29 1 12AC IAA 01.44,worm MSS OM Mt II.30.1 IN THE NE 1/4, BCC 12, T 29, R1W, WV CITY or mum WASIONGTON COUNTY, OREGON AUOUST II.1440 :ill ...... .... mut- 1 '11111■---- — 31•1•• UMW/ 01..nneo .11 00 1.1.1•[111.4. (1,1•0 Sani vE.R■11 ‘•• _, nr..."—`....., 1111INPI 'llr ,•,?,•0.' /'2– *•1"1:•■%*•Tr.::**:':"...:070 re I.0/30.012." —ALM — –_– --,L.r.■....._ . :,:::1....T 0•.Is n..e...... F-11111 irr....1%r•''''•"•• '•?III ill N‘I\I‘I‘I% * – -. 1–=0/ 4F, .1.•••••••• 72**••• Rj I . .0.0. •014 ,.. . .1.101 '441411 s, ... •.-. lir \ . • N .61 lb t .s. ...... ....... _ ! IA= I ' _.......,, • ■ ,L OEND. ••■••• • ........nue••■•..0 ......*, KW'. Br ..... .177 •.0.° • ....no , • I.0. I r • ......_ ... ...•.,,,,,.., Q.- 4411111111111111114 4-- . mi...ea. I .., . ...• t P.M': 00••••■ • we vera• 7 ....• ••••...wag .....Pus ■••• wee as.•■•■-!Er•■new KIM It 11 MK 3d. 44.0B7•1 El V,ftl.0 IMO ...., ,..,.,...._.....,...., I . tr MO IT 0 .... SA 6110 MI-0E.ma..•yea..OW ■•••■• 1 AVOW..■17.1..rr.........n./.100•00100•■•■011.0 ..... . .0. . \ ...... 00.0 • .a......Yr PO.Of Da we 010••••21.01'ale PO tme;Ma Off 00.0.10,...IV•IMMIX 0//NW PK IP swm■ =VI, e 0.01.re•is.•Far 01•F MOM AA..la I•/If VIVIll ma• .L1110•L. 10101,400•.....el••AM..10 Wain MI PIM°NM ,......■Willa I Nee.01 WM..0 ImInton mao...m. FARM I I41.1'XI f I _---- - ----. • ••••••a Ims ar••non Nu ar me a...Km ara,...o. a ..1r.r.,ry.,.....A....”,.......,....v.,. 1 I walla sm.Ill•ffr.1 10:0•17l. :11,S marderranart ad a rt.,tacan.r a•cm gam.a.nar.zrair..Fe•• 0.,0••■•Ia■0=704 0,11871*.p.0...way.ze-wp. ,.......5......„,./.. IV Man.MO•••0.0.De UNI•0 MIIIIIIIMOn Or•■•,••01 I 1 0 1111 1 IW* • MP•■••■•Yin.0 nalfInu••N•I MAIM IP•••••■•• Den Mir OW L4•0•2111 DOM.••IMIWIN111.Mon 0... •••"'..7'.."17%1:-..f.7.rr''''r.1'.'"• I ... GRAMM SCALE 15;EIZI I•1=1 .am.no• 1.7:IC 1 it LIA5 Cb42CM7014S____ Sunvelm 9m: • TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY ANDY PARIS ANO ASSOCIATES. INC. FC9: ENCWEERE0 STSFJCTURES.INC. 13*2 SOARS roam 80.0 uaE am=ar908 SMat..lSt BENG TAX LOT 300,TAX MAP 25 112AC PH:538-130 IN TIM NE 1/4. SEC. 12,T.25.. R,1F..1CIL CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Au Jsr 21.1999 R'4 OCTOBER t9.1999 I I .,.... -n"--- ...� •■■_. Err 5_`C09,0' 'Orr ,...■ la9.M RP vaxv�[aaaN.0 MOW _J •w sar. ti �L 1 i wm suawrlue .,_. ""� . O�E:CN f • ---1--• S m'b'Y c�.... I,../ •• '�_�x WA=P. J ''''. "'"'"7.' � �� T.7 �� s �.rY TO IT an Or r'a fm mr o.na Ewa. ��raa al ._ Err a_._ ..aw ~- +I �' at S. -."....t'iP . r 'r \ 1, _ .., -- --- as c.N.-a, x �• �'� OVE T3 38vsr _tea, L 1 a_a_1 I�' ( -- i s 7/ ).k • ' 1:7 Ca PI e i A) F • nano ■. rTJ LlevaIlOZ.. :} � I ..• A .� a:;a I N ' Pop /'It r. '� Ana �" 4III=72 7 Ca,58 o.vs v. _ I .� war wrs a 3�/ga'�?j02-0 na._b .,:. a.r,fl • I7 �..,.a.•a■aa a.a e i L rY a inure a I...a4.s s� I fir! r� _,.a a a• ••. a� ..—Q�I Ir ` - P R r)Po 5 E D 1...A N 0 P 4 2 T 1 T I rZ N ..D.. 73 7.-,_.W.a.w.r..r.,.r<„7{‘ m rta ._. ...1w..400%-•,...„__ _..-.,- � .:.Ear GRAPHIC SCALE I>ren A.r, • SJ8048:8 f': ANDY PARIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY :-9E]ROOKS IEARY ROAD F0.•: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. CO c 1.0 MECO.MCA.,1619-32' M.,J,-JJ.t 2. HEiNG TAX LOT 300, TAX YAP 2S 1 12AC 0 c, 2 206 W THE NE 1/4. SEC. 12. T.22.. RAW.. 1E.Y >w S q ""� CRY OF TIGARD C R� 11ASHRiGTON COUNTY. OREGON pig AU(RO T 21. 1998 j 1 1 iLh15E'J.JST 21ER 19.1999 J ii A `- ^.+raw .G,,,f•i- .•b!.! .,.,.w. ... n. I a f –i'O° r S•• ——— �aGrarm E———— czee J �� .V i e.n - owr r ' .—�.G'Rr.'. . ti" / -�.r --��"si u a.r V� iI F.:• 1, o� nravaww\ r,r — .� 't t c G � ' L IN&L - ��..."'f '.Wf7 —SUILDIN6'*2 �c T'o s amass r / \�665F. 1 I-;";:. : ‘N 11 ‘01111 r p Pow wars spwa Cr 5 \ d N •QQQQ W —'—� �� Jam" s r p J••rri���i� PROPOSED ,'•• I �Q 1 I- i r,' / R— ILbIN6 w ■ k ..�v '4 1 Tea.w . . nod.cur,.d z� r� �7�.— R.0,127.,•. .r..,�• LEGONEt 4( F! ' a µ woe am j ,R°�o. m a R� -�_ ,1212 .o.Rr; ..°.v .e' C ' ,•� % a ..mr•,•.r o Rr,.00.,. a•`.sRV.re a�fon•..wDS ii. % / ��Ppr' ® era • ,.. f.or..r..,.., f>w�....a` /4 ..m.R,,, ;:^°^�..°° ' �^ pip a o til c YELL Loa Parr A•9•A•n.arcapo.swir macs es'Awe.ACK COOK, /•■, /31 Ot .a.■•• SPOT new.,-nen.noes secesesn.sawn.Mr war..NW or wr wow CO U t... =�, `J I w` r..11110.,_1212.,•. P`r,, ., [arose cwwoocro.o• a ocw,w°W LI I aA+., ".wu \ �. so,acwr-RR >earn.o.. ` i�Qwr'.m.."rn comas war na rv"Mr• II0 d � ~ .-.1• ,""".W•AlS•. -`"''�'A. -- ":w F M r a<..r-N a .w SR', ""Pr..ses ANN W no:,,..,w•4w�c�.�,c a 61 1Y wen SITE PLAN Fccvlsoa: to/2o/aa w P MST,SP ..R„o_1_7777,• .4••,, a �csuou All Previous Flans .�«_ ■C.CP.I^__•,Y,•r• ...VS,' WS ./iROfL..r WM.I.W K'D,J• ,,�1• M s•ec -TAI.,m,..GA• .0,..as _J�.wiwGS .RC'• ,•Crr.r: Vas...Se-S..f• •?,J. WS __-�'S�RIC-JRcS Na mac.- •.OR360..1J7,.H• ,M f• Sr. if.SC:. 9F°c_ice C-'-w' r.IO,AYS,r.GS• 4291,• .t -�'•'SS'Cu C _•.u4VEER::SRL::.:RES.•c. yA-1 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITYOFTIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Comu to mcnt vrT Or TIaARD.OANOtt Community [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six[61 Months' S(urpuzfJ Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: ��(�� STAFF AT PRE-APP.' t A9k / APPLICANT: "riaIN FOLScki\liat.1 ; _- " AGENT: �. .4-- Phone:[ I E Phone: [ 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: _ �1J � TAX MAP[SI/LOT#(S1: 2. ( L:2--INC- X11— 'ZOO NECESSARY APPLICATION(S1: {i (. or I r • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Cs seC 2- (N/ ( �(z•vN S (. -c- ..t'J USt AL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: L '\L ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: ..L - L C.I.T.AREA: FACILITATOR: PHONE: (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL RE,QWREMENTS M;n. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. LuAgferge lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear ft. Corner W ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum Ian caged or natural vegetation jj %. (Refer to Code Section 18. �� I ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NOM-liesidential Application/Planning Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of • ➢ •WE' ' ' " •NES: -- , a • he site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: )=. A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; r All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/2) of the building's height; and ✓ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.1 � • c`` PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: �` .( � g:t7) Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): l� NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ✓ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. r Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parking: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. r. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. i Minimum number of accesses: ( Minimum access width: O . Minimum pavement width: • driveways and parking areas, except f r some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: J44- [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON♦esldenUal Application/Planning Division Section WALKWA1 REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 *LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080] <OLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 BUFFS•ING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas alo•• -- - :- 'meters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of a . Buffer areas must be • upied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and s .• and must also achieve a balance •etween vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obsc -• screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if • required • e Code. The required buffer areas may only be o upied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer are. materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your pro•osal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. --t along east u ary. feet along south boundary. fee • st boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: iANDSCAPING STREET : ' I - ' - ' OR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR RI as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 019 NON-BuuIdeatlal Application/Planning DtvIsloa Section GNS • SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SENSIYE LANDS M��� �`- ockkie-D .F`` /(, 43 Th e provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR EVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. — (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) STEEP SLOPE r Th. (2 � YIQ C& S (2.. -�) --n STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. 4UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON$esldentlalllppllcatloo/Maaning Division Section 4-1NATER RESOURCES OVERLAY OISTRI61 The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030) 4Atiparian Setback Reductions — . 1/4-At The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON4eildepflal Application/Planning Ohfltle0 Section That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplai,I; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.197.1001 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ cf MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E l CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 MOH-DesldooDniappIIatton/Planninn Division Section NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32] i• ��• � ktkA046 Li& 8. • ODE CHQPT �7'�C.3 l 1 F(U-A 8.80 18.92 18.102 18.116 18.150 18.84 _ 18.9. 18.11: 18.120 18. :s 18.: :.98 1 :. 08 18.13! :.162 :.88 18.100 8.114 :. 4 18.164 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050] NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION P NAME RESERVATION PRIOR 0 SUBMITTING A SUBDIVIS E APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applica 's are required to complet file a subdivisio slat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office i der to obtain approval -servation for an subs. •.me. Applic. ions will not be epted as complete until the receives t - e. confirmation of approv:l from the C.. y of the Subdivision Name Reservation. I • rveyol's Office: 503-648-8884] BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1019 NONalesldentlel Appllatlon/Planning glvlsleo Section ikIlECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: r 1 sSEtt\cg wto,. C Kb\fc ;wt — _ to wLs.1#La'. ‘&l Sc:)' 4f Nib fultittee. :czioNS I s*R w Ft Pct 6Q of NOLkeCCE MitsQ f A M,,t• . , . e• _ 1.:.! PROCEDURE ✓ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. . APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard tkef A4 c O ice . . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-iesldeatlal Appllcatloa/Plaoalap OhAslaa Sectloa This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: KV\ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (5031639-4171 FAX: (5031684-7297 E-MAIL: (starts r ame)@ci.tigard.or.us i:\curpin\rnasters\revised\preapp-c.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Updated: Jun.7,99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section TITLE 18 DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD TABLE OF CONTENTS 18.100 INTRODUCTION 18.100 Legislative Notes eMQi (Ce .C_-S 18.110 Introduction 18.120 Definitions P0)'` SC•OtiCSN� 18.130 Use Classifications 18.200 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 18.200 Legislative Notes 18.210 General Administrative Provisions 18.220 Zoning Administration 18.230 Enforcement 18.300 LAND USE DECISIONS 18.300 Legislative Notes 18.310 Summary of Land Use Permits 18.320 Annexations 18.330 Conditional Use 18.340 Director's Interpretations 18.350 Planned Developments 18.360 Site Development Review 18.370 Variances and Adjustments 18.380 Zoning Map and Text Amendments 18.385 Miscellaneous Permits 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures 18.400 LAND DIVISION 18.400 Legislative Notes 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments 18.420 Land Partitions • 18.430 Subdivisions 18.500 ZONING DISTRICTS 18.500 Legislative Notes 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts 18.600 COMMUNITY PLAN AREA STANDARDS 18.600 Legislative Notes 18.610 Tigard Town Center(Optional) 18.620 Tigard Triangle Design Standards 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center(Optional) Table of Contents 1 11/26/98 18.700 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 18.700 Legislative Notes 18.705 Access,Egress and Circulation 18.710 Accessory Residential Units 18.715 Density Computations 18.720 Design Compatibility Standards 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards 18.740 Historic Overlay 18.742 Home Occupations 18.745 Landscaping and Screening 18.750 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage 18.760 Nonconforming Situations 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.775 Sensitive Lands `7 18.780 Signs 18.785 Temporary Uses 18.790 Tree Removal 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas 18.797 Water Resources(WR)Overlay District 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities 18.800 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.800 Legislative Notes 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards Table of Contents ii 11/26/98 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES u„+� I tsa ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q City Tigard, f t SiapingA Better Community 2`1,( 12 PUBLIC FACILITIES "f:30 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section ( ) _ strer iprovements will be necessary alor- _ • , to include: ❑ feet of pavement I 1 concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk 1 street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) OP- Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGAnn Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Eipleeerlap Department Section are on the opposite 3 of the street from the site. If the , in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee i -lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary,sewer line to this property is a(n) 10 inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to 'k IF ioJ S(�'j T a1-1 , lt-) I �-�,,,,� V�b`t v.n.L Tick —� —c:.& Apg Ni W► . Water Supply: t,< r� L, )6-A The C i`cy of �ia,o .p - Phone:(503) cn��_ `111' provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious s ices. The resolution contains a pr- •sion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of consL..acting an on-site facility provided si.. ..fic criteria are met. The City will • use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( L Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. • `7 M-c t c .Nc6e---,.4CT7 1, jt era,..1(1 1-,R-- Ti-C &-/-(5711,4/ ( l(--AI _/ - 6A-0 St, K1 H ri To d(� , 1,-Apk� f2;C INv;RE, 7t--tortr D,1,` t_oe.m i$4(1 M, n TI. , b 1� 1_ k..(Jl rI l-Z- l I• -- ,\ -� S. . -� -�-+6 -rte De.., S - �..: c-.� p QP -� P A0 \,n.1(1)10 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS -- Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way Cloor easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 EnglneerIng Department Section In addition, the pen �e will be required to post a bon r similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the-applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS Fr 'UBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: c s ( E GINEERING DEPARTMENT STAF Phone: [503)639-4111 Fax: [503)684-1291 h.spa tty\ma s to rs\p re a p p.e n g (Master section preapp-r mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 016 Eogloeerlog Department Sectlom CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefull in con'unction with the notes •rovided to ou at the *re- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: I!\� Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Er:: Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan I3 Existing Conditions Map Er Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Q/ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ 7 Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Cdr Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan ▪ Site Development Plan GK.- Architectural Drawings — 3,ASCc -tiaNS ▪ Landscape Plan O,' Sign Drawings ❑ 1 Public Improvements/Streets Plan M.F 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES 2 COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND KEPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study EN�.\\IEZ�Q∎r 5 ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study . B--- Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ / Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis E � Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8% x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets,easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ • Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ • Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ • A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ • Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height El • is1;curpinlmastersVevised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 RECEIVED PLANNING acv sTnucro �•� 44. SEP 2 7 1999 : ESI CITY OF TIGARD 9,�u��, o September 24, 1999 oc. gibe cONStP Design •Construction • Export Tigard City Of 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 RE: Empire Batteries Building Project Dear Interested Party: I am representing the owner's of the property located at 7360 SW Bonita (Tax Lot 300, 2S1, 12AC) in Tigard, Oregon. Empire Batteries is proposing to build approximately 19,000 square feet of new light industrial buildings on the southern (rear) portion of this site. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like General Contractor to discuss the project in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on October 11, 1999 at • Pacific Northwest 5:30 at the following location. • Hawaii Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 • Pacific Rim Tigard, Oregon 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. The plans may be altered prior to the submittal for application at the City of Tigard. I look forward to meeting and discussing this project with you. Please call me if you have questions regarding this project at 968-3118. Sincerely, John Boutinen 7360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 Phone: 503.968.3118 Fax: 503.968.6639 ABCE-mail: esi@esiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com zrig=,., ((𙒽 • June 2, 1999 `0 sTRUCt •is - City of Tigard Planning Staff City Of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ,i• m Isr',;, Tigard, Oregon 97223 4,60 CONStP To Whom This Concerns, Design •Construction • Export This letter and the attached copies of the proposed site plan with the legal description and parcel map will serve as our application for a "Pre-application Conference". SITE ADDRESS 7320 SW Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon 97223 TAX MAP 2S1, 12AC TL 300 OWNER Empire Batteries, Inc. P.O. Box 23962 Tigard, Oregon 97281 AUTHORIZED AGENT John Boutinen General Contractor Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road • Pacific Northwest Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Hawaii Phone 968-3118 Fax 968-6639 ▪ Pacific Rim PROPOSED USE New light Industrial tenant space as allowed by the City of Tigard Development Code and continuation of the existing light industrial uses. 7360 SW Hunziker#101 Tigard,OR 97223-2305 Phone: 503.968 3118 Fax. 503.968.6639 :4iIL E-mail: esi @esiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com ..o.o..xx,..-•. C(8#103613 • PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed development will include the construction of (2) new buildings with a total of 19,096 square feet. The project will also include a new driveway (aligned with the existing approach) onto SW Bonita Road to serve the new development to the south of the existing building. New landscaping will be included to enhance the site and the area along the south property line will remain undisturbed. A new sign is proposed along the south side of SW Bonita Road. The sign will be located to avoid the required vision triangle at the proposed driveway and SW Bonita Road. PROJECT CONTACT John Boutinen Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 968-3118 Fax 968-6639 Please call or fax me if you have any questions. Sincerel , John Boutinen Project Manager 968-3118 (phone) 968-6639 (fax) 4 g I >r 1.,....,.%11-1. , feu, I I ti of wY Roan f ism oil e l./ark I-,ro ►, 411 1 gr 2g 1 ii �I I ; , 'Rod CU 111 11I N* _ i I 16 CO 41 W I$11I 1 4111 RI. 4 N •E i N w +� w of N�Igi i Y 7 1 I ‘c:..----- ---.----11.---......---...---.4"114 crl gll .410 -r• 0 0 I (1_ � N I f A _ v ` ht... I, u... i 1NGTON� 1- ' 4 + iNORTHERN ` BURS I 74th +' ✓- .0. vi: �, I O .IOAE'4O'AI/C) MaoY in 1' Q _„,vi„pa ' int • '�3 it I ' 0.4• _ rb 1* 1 .I /4. _ i , I ' 41' n I I Mime— - w I O 1...i u 4 a N x;11 PIA 1 . !2 POUT _.I 7. i 114 ' y' .4 p t p��o .. >b O _ i! , S ID i > it 3 $g '' x - 2 '- ., od 4' d�∎ E � w 4 N . � 1 1 Iw p owl* ! 0/'L.I ' ` t A/HI /II, . ,` a a * N • p 8i8'd bE3'ON ' 311I1 09tiJI HD Ob:6 8661'2. 'At1W SURVEYED BY: TI �vRVEYED BY: MDY RA: CIA7es.M. SITE Y TRUCTU: tII :i:TAX H 12AC!! 12, T.2 ., 1f H IGARD; NTY, Oa ry , 1998 iL!i I 94'- ' 66-T IS/Ib' N h,y F�uu K 1 1/".`6E1NT01 /V•KT AIM., W d'(.7 :1i SNZSTRORTTJ9i �\ . s •i NT /"%%%///�{��������y�yy��{I{IHELD `'4; == TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF NAY — S 0039'00• E — — —•_C -— .69.9GT 36266 - 146 66 O 3 W PROFESSIONAL t0.00 x,s.7xs MMEE .__..A.;. 15 \�;. I + r s,.. 2 ow ,�cZ7 �r \ OT.E GI THE CITY ai TGARD.ME AREA LAND SURVEYOR o;.- l' ■ L i9=L.:3 _ J 4 . FLUSH NWASPHALT N n 1 �raver wo. ��;,� a ... ...............g 0039•Og• E�� 16982 �� �UILG # \�--� }■pj OEGO 3 6 .P..� . FLUSH N ASPHALT _-- _ 5 N MAROLD�. SALO I M 0079'00'w / ♦<7 . DO aT G • 0 DI PP,.,B Si MC I 0.10'I lINIXI aana ,-J; W°T"`` 7.arrrz .'. ,r / -` ..\ Z N csi a, • •au,sms ' '\ xr.ss.cs «.sxs �.,,-0. BIKE RACK �'��_ ,� ,�,, , \ L�IGlN[ T CO M.AI.f +r../aGf 4 W 0 CO CD ACCESSIBLE / ,\ \ \/ 0 c li I 1(3 ROUTE na.•. #•v....: \ I maw ,N \ R • 1 `• `' ...•_ :`gym 1 r• 1 W NA sou sacs IC MP.cwcncrz WWI. �i p W = U7 7nnMl woo AAA I I �'� J .' \ W co (ACC**. \- Z En o •saa�rz \ V / o\� �- , 22� ` I a • I I \�(\ ' n.I1CS Z I % PROPOSED / .;,, . . . l•I E- .so K. ,V6 \ 1 ,,. Bf�1tDING #I /'/ Z snrx ` m zmcs 15,400 S.F. '- V6• % 1MC.•YO I (4)SPACE m 7.___:____________------ ' i .1 (% : if �� I BIKE RACK ! r PA11G�2 1.ArNa, I o�V 1� Vi.I.. I — ....• 6,954 SO.FL TOTAL _ �� ����/ W ��� k1:_ \ �� - ` 0,067 S0. FT. TP TOP OF BANK 70, q:/ G °~'oNa o o f~�'•o I IN L _ .'. . . . . . / n.�..a i I r4s.Dort 1.383, I r.e.r.m :ji NOTES •,w..,u•, s,K,� _------v--------,...--I, I. ELEVATIONS ARE ON OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS DATUM FROM Z BENCH MARK Na r-67 SET If II76,A J'BRASS pA'. J a• 4 coortrz•no 5/B W sr.r sc 2 THE BOUNDARIES AS SHOW ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, THIS Ob.LNN HELD MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY TO BE RECORDED,BUT WAS DONE FOR J I _ I c a nrz LEGEND STE/nwo INFORMATION ONLY.. T 4. / 't j/ • MONUMENT FOUND AS N0/ID 3 /MS SURVEY/5 MADE FOR THE OYP/pVAL PURCHASER OF ME SURVEY ONLY. n , ' '`yT�j = IR. IRON ROD ANDY PAINS t ASSOCIATES INC.ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR NFCRMATICIN „t 1R 1 l • / // SHORN HEREON TO ANY OMER WSTTNROVS OR SUBgIXENT PURCHASERS •.rL• Y1 W , sna i \` I.P. IRON PIPE a THE PROPERTY. In ;I I / I % ' * �js 1 � ��j�/ \� •04 RATER VALVE WATER METER 1. SURVEY IS VALID ONLY lF PRINT HAS SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF SURVEYOR. �r n 1 1 / J S NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY TO OBTAIN OR D C V' V _ 24 �_/�//�_JK �' /� FIRE HYVRANT SHOW DATA CLNCERIANG EDSIENCE SIE.DEPTH, CONDITION.CAPACITY,OR lel CI Il • /�� ��. /�/ + ��\ WS METER LOCA RON OF ANY LITTUTY OR MUNICIPAL/PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITY. RCN REGARDING THESE TEACKITES PLEASE CON/ACT L� EZ'1 '6. N000 UTILITY PC£ THE APPRQWIA iT AGENCIES ANV`� {f- / p METAL L/W7 POST 6. THE LOCAiKN AND OR EXISTENCE OF UTILITY SERVICE LOVES 70 71E •� W r 0 f'.T cm:s: '0;.T \ p/r ANCHOR PROPERRTY SUR{f/Ey SIP£UAYMOMN ANO ARE NOT SfOMN. v O leaa -0- N CONEOEREG AS A PART OF TMS EIR1£r NO STATEMENT,.cart SPOT ELEVATION-FNISI FLOOR Z SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL COVOITEOVS HERE NOT EXAMINED OR I 01cr+c OUNCFRA•NG TT#CUTSIENCT Or IAVOEROPLXND Lw OVE/RKAD CONTAINERS SPOT ELEVATION- TOP OF BANK OR FAOE/7ES THAT MAY AFFECT/NE USE OR DEVELOPMENT PBS TRACT. N- saaxs 9507 ELEVATION-GROUND SNOT B MIS SURVEY GOES NOT CONSONTE A 1171£S£AACN BY SURVEYOR. 1-- 2 THERE MAY EXIST CASESEN7S CONDITIONS.OR R£STRK'71ON$MAT CONED S/D R. w/IRC ~6 r-N.c..s AFFECT PC 7171£ RAS PROPERTY. NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MAX IN 4 SPOT ELEYATTON- TOP BACK Or VERTICAL CR7B 0_ 5 897 ASN4L a• IL 1.111 00r: - MIS SURVEY TO SHOW SUCH MATTERS THAT MAY AFFECT nTU ass' 3835R.W SALT SITE ANALYSIS G ,1 ' II I � ‘441,--__ " SITE � BUILDABLE SITE AREA• 61529 S.F. Revised: V/�/�� }�SCALE: I°=40-0�� EXISTING BuILDIN6. 14359 S.F. 16% Destroy All Previous Plans a.rz 4/SON9 PROPOSED BUILDINGS• 19,096 SF. 25% ASPHALT 1 CONCRETE PAVING• 40,160 S.F. 49% .cwt .7 LANDSCAPE AREA(ABOVE T.O.S)• 6,054 S.F. 1096 AS NOTED 960505 THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF TOTAL SITE AREA• 90,416 5.F o•.w cr1[o® G EXISTING BUILDING• 14359 S.F. 16% QI 1 ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. AND ARE A.U•I PROPOSED BUILDINGS• 19,096 S.F. 21% V`di NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY ASPHALT s CONCRETE PAVING• 40,160 S.F. 44% MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN 040.0 c PERMISSION OF ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. /\�I S LANDSCAPE SPACE: 16,921 S.F. MS« l� P ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS • January 14, 2000 sTRUC! a ♦. :t Site Design Review Application for 7320 SW Bonita ESI = Road + .w4 WP�.° PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1� 004 ~'O! CONStP The proposed development includes (2) new buildings providing 19,166 square feet of light industrial space along Design •Construction • Export with the addition of 44 additional parking spaces, a new driveway, improvements to the landscaping, a storm water quality facility and related improvements. The existing building and grounds are in need of maintenance. The proposal will include partitioning the existing tax lot into (2) parcels. The development will require a reciprocal access agreement for circulation around the exiting building. PROPOSED USE The building will be leased to tenants for any use allowed by the City of Tigard I-L zoning. The uses will be compatible with the uses on the adjacent properties and there were not any negative comments from the affected neighbors or any members of the Tigard Community General Contractor Involvement Teams, which were contacted for the Public Meeting held on October 11 , 1999. • Pacific Northwest • Hawaii This application is being submitted for a Site Development Review and Type II Land Partition in accordance with the • Pacific Rim requirements of Section 18.360 of the "Development Code for the City of Tigard". APPROVAL CRITERIA18.120 Site Development Review The applicant has completed the Pre-Application Conference (6/15/99) and the required Neighborhood Meeting (9/11/99) as required prior to the Site Development Review Application. The application includes the existing site plan and the Site Development Plan along with the preliminary architectural floor plan and building elevations. Please contact John Boutinen at Engineered Structures, Inc (968-3118) regarding any questions on the proposed project. 1360 SWHunziker#l01 APPROVAL CRITERIA18.120 Site Development Review 1. The proposed project has addressed the requirements Tigard,OR 97223-2305 of Chapter 18.800. Phone: 503 968.3118 2. The buildings are located to utilize the exiting topography and drainage and preserve the (1) exiting Fax: 503.968.6639 E-mail: esi©esiww.com Web Site: www.esiww.com On• N Stilot Stc (w.5ionS 3. significant tree. The area within 50' of Ball Creek or the wetland identified in the Wetlland Delineation prepared by Schott and Associates will not be developed. Adequate building separation is provided for access, fire control, air circulation and solar access. 4. Not applicable. 5. The project site is surrounded by industrially zoned properties, which are similar in their scale of development and uses. The new development will have a 50' wide buffer to the south and is set back more than 150' from Bonita Road. 6. Not applicable. 7. Not applicable. 8. Not applicable. 9. The City of Tigard has not advised us of any plans for a path along Ball Creek and this proposal does not include any dedications along Ball Creek. Ball Creek terminates in a culvert at both SW 72nd and at the Southern Pacific Railroad. 10.The public access and private areas are defined by the proposed landscaping, walkways, driveways and parking areas. 11.The building mounted exterior lighting will provide the required lighting levels for the parking areas. The mailboxes will be located on the site in a highly visible area. 12.There are no plans for a transit facility on this site. Access to existing public transit stops is via the exiting public sidewalks on SW Bonita and SW 72nd 13.The proposed landscaping exceeds the requirements for the Light Industrial District. 14.The storm water drainage is designed to meet the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency and includes a storm water quality facility. 15.The proposed project is designed to provided access for the disabled and to meet the access requirements of the Uniform Building Code. 16.The project has been designed to meet the provisions and regulations of the "Development Code" for the City of Tigard. CODE CRITERIA (Based upon the sections highlighted during the " pre-application Conference".) 18.410 Lot Line Adjustments The proposed project requires a Type II Land Partition be approved by the City of Tigard. The proposed partition will create (2) lots. The new lot will meet the development standards for the Light Industrial Zone. The existing (developed) lot will meet the development standards for the Light Industrial Zone, except for the existing non-conforming front setback and landscaping. (The non-conforming conditions are a result of the public street widening project.) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts The proposed project meets the goals for the Light Industrial District at noted in Section 18.530.020 B. The proposed new development complies with the development standards contained in Table 18.530.2. 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation The project is designed to meet the requirements of 18.705.030,1. The project includes eliminating (1) existing driveway access which serve the existing building and combining the access onto (1) common driveway with a reciprocal access agreement. The traffic flow north of the exiting building will be limited to (1) direction due to the existing non-conforming front setback condition. 18.745 Landscaping and Screening The proposed landscaping and natural areas for the entire site will exceed the 15% area requirements of the IL District and the requirements of 18.745. A new landscape irrigation system will be installed for the new planting areas (except the storm water quality pond and the hydro-seeded bank area). The site plan illustrates the landscaping improvements. The new trees on site shall have a minimum caliper of 2", (measured 4' in height). There aren't any required buffers for this site, but a 50' wide streamside riparian setback will remain along Ball Creek. An erosion control plan in compliance with the Unified Sewer Agency The new solid waste and recycling enclosures shall be screened by a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 18.760 Non-conforming Situations The existing building has a non-conforming front setback and landscaping. At the time of development, the project did conform to the existing standards. The non-conforming setback is a result of the widening of SW Bonita Road. The proposed project will not increase the non-conformity. 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste The local franchised hauler (Pride Disposal) has reviewed the site plan and approved the enclosures as located on drawing A-1 . The enclosures will be screened with a 6' high chain link fence with vinyl slats. 18.765 Off Street Parking and Loading The Site Development Plan allows for the required off street parking and loading to meet or exceed the requirements of Chapter 18.106, as per the following calculations. New Parking Required 19,166 square feet of proposed building. 1.6 parking spaces required per 1,000 square feet of new building. 31 new spaces required. 44 new spaces provided. New Bicycle Parking Required 19,166 square feet of proposed building. .1 bicycle spaces required per 1,000 square feet of new building. 2 bicycle spaces required. 6 bicycle spaces provided. 18.775 Sensitive Lands The site contains a wetland area at the southwest corner near the culvert under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Ball Creek then leaves the site and runs eastward towards SW 72nd. A 50' streamside buffer is maintained to avoid any development on sensitive lands. 18.780 Signs The proposed project includes a new lighted, commercial sign. A drawing is included. The sign will be located 25' behind the public sidewalk and mounted at an elevation that will not interfere with the visual clearance requirements of Section 18.795. The required signage will be installed for the ADA accessible parking spaces and no parking signs will be installed on the trash enclosure gate. The one way exit driveway along the north side of the existing building will be marked with directional arrows and a sign. 18.168 I-L Light Industrial District The proposal is consistent with the allowable uses and requirements of the IL District. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas The proposed project will include a new 24' wide driveway and enter onto SW Bonita Road. The Visual Clearance Area requirements have been considered in the design of the proposed improvements to the site. 18.790 Tree Removal The Existing Conditions plan indicates that the only existing tree with a caliper of 6" or more is a 10" Alder. That tree will remain. The remainder of the site is presently covered with a mixture of bushy vegetation, grass, blackberries and small trees. The entire site has been cleared previously. The existing ground cover will be removed in the areas to be developed. The 50' wide corridor as shown along Ball Creek will remain unchanged. A minimum of (10) new 2" caliper trees will be added. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas The proposed project will include a new 24' wide driveway and enter onto SW Bonita Road. The Visual Clearance Area requirements have been considered the proposed improvements to the site. 18.797 Water Resources Overlay District The area of development will setback 50' from the wetlands along Ball Creek. (See the "Wetland Delineation for Empire Battery" by Schott and Associates.) 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards The proposed development will require the abandonment of (1) exiting driveway. (See the "Pre-application" notes by Brian Rager.) A new sanitary sewer connection will also be required for the new tax lot. New water meters will need to be installed for the new buildings. As a result, a Street Opening permit will be required for this project. • TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY SURVEYED BY ANDY PARIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. 15962 BOONES FERRY ROAD LAKE OS1•EG0, OREGON 97035-4351 BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC PH: 636-3341 IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 12, T.2S., R1W., W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ■ AUGUST 21, 1998 REVISED: OCTOBER 19, 1999 rBY IA T/1PC nN.1 AswL SAYATAr 0010ET W 101.10 n AMMO JVB1R FLUSH I 7..717.74 lACAC AEPWaal IEiDET \ r10. S 0039'00' E mane irla.eA 382.88' '°'° _ ../ i/7'L ' P 57 REGISTERED 10.00' a/0PJ900.W �� f PROFESSIONAL II - O, .zn. ! 7445 ISMIN LAND SURVEYOR 144014. { 107E J/b2R. w/1PC n.ASWa ! ACCORDING TO 111E CRY 6 11GiD.THE AREA FLUSH N ASPHALT a macs..114 •w n.a�wn n� FIOOD RAIN_TE 100 TEAR IN 1 PLAIN � a. 040 5 0039'06'E\.n, 189.82' aN DE TEST SOE OF 72nd AVENUE IS 124.00'. OREGON 5/11YR. w/1PC `1- �- a'I / RNA PANEL I IS 4102 14 MOW DATED MARDI �� 1 nr.W1a !Q .1.• 1.1942 HAROLD P. SALO N num IN w ASPHALT J/BtR.•w:AIK aW MOO a4G' rear• ��,11,D tit' \ DDIEV 5Y �, Min ILCAIE •41 fine ••.1111[ \ IMAM 1040.10= AW./MMI }�19. \ I 1440_1 )4, rr.a k /1 Aw1MlT fi 47JN• is, Her M>ana n saTO iY/Faww NI 1�' '6 d 1 :AWL w AKAwO nr/wa NO ELEVATlta4>!, \ . ` 0, 1� DATA AVAR.ABLE Ar'"" m nrNs OU£ TO BRASH I HA� AI,R�a .�a+ oNwa WARM wTUn MINN. f LEGEND: J INCA INFO Ara �% ' I n.aaw. • MOMBbVT FOND AS NOTED LA RCN RGO \ ,a,,,,sE. T U9 IRON PPE a \ ' 147 IEI/OP MILK \ I MaN10 ! nRIYMw Ratio - ICOPPr® GAS LEhR I na..aa ((Ø , a.Ip7E1P L1ETER M . IN7�UTUTT POLE �1eVa1lCJ /I TAI U0/T 606► Nus ,. , � 741TFR AMWaN9 (\\v..\\A"' naaTw P 1 B • GUY ANCHOR rrAaau m //rasa at nnRw SPOT QEYATIW-WWI FLOOD r IMO E.OZ ___ \ �� PEA l /as. SPOT QEYATIOY--1016 OF BANK \ PARCEL 2 M� 60 ' � 48,934 S0.FT. TOTAL d I O"� 7 6 �faly�r a AWN. SPOT ELEVATION-CROWD SNOT 'VW 40,0001 S0. FT. To TOP OF BANK ��„� 3/�,�/IblJ�7,[1 a� /MAIM 490.19; NOTES• D Ada/! SPOT ELEVATION-7�RACK VERTICAL L1AIB lIrAM• m • /1.11 nw./Wa0 I. ELL-NATIONS ARE ON 00EGOI DEPARAENT IF TRANSPORTADO'S DA1W FRE* W LOOM V N r.Waa/ ..._� BONN YARR NO.Y-67 SET N 1974 A r BRASS DISK r4auv raal.e I 2 � r 31185(1'7YAP0 RECC410ELL DvT LN:001E FOP r ouw lW Ora. - 511E/70°6 NFLAYAAGN ONLY rO1a a 114 Naeaa^° S R w/1PC o1FN uw YMI.[E PIS 3121' 3 7765 31.IRLeY 6 MAK FOP 711E QNOVAL nA40HASEIP K 711E 31AP1kY OLY. IaQ CAE hELO FOP LNE SHOWN HEREON Y OTHER NS7/TUTIOYSS OR SUBSEQUENT HNO/ASERS I PARCEL 1 ME OF 41.482 SO. FT. 4. 201A1'6 VALE ONLY F PONT HAS SEAL AFO 001411111E CF SURLE14t o r /1401. ______•.------ S NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE AS A PMT OF 746 SURVEY 1O OBTAIN OP __ SHOW DATA CONCERNING E7057ERCE 312E 006744 DOO77OR WAGER;OR S 1.1(`29 1.7314000 YFODIAAOY CREG11EMVC MESE MITES 0 DINGS PLEASE CONTACT 145 THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES 1g6.2A & 111E 1.0011104 ARO CR EM757D/K 540 UTUFY 50214CE LIES'TO THE ��. / PRORR7Y 31IRK5ED ARE UNKNOWN MB ARE NOT 92018E 7. 3100 ACE AND O11E/5PWFIITAL 006/10015 NEW NOT EA'AYE0 09 1)1.1. CQq 8R0D AS A PMT 6 7MS SU71ET. NO STATEMENT 6 LEAK_. FM•� 5P F MAT MAT FAFFECT INEE OR LEIE5�OF 176 TRACT TaW a 7145 9AP1EY DOES NOT COVS177U1F A 717.E MU00I BY 311856100. 'l 71 MAY DI ST EASEMENT;CLVDr7ONS OR REST01C7NW5 HINT CORD WALT ``` 7116 SURVEY 10 OW WS T7E PS 7 AT ATTEMPT BEEN YAK N TITLE 3/b2R W/FPC w • .A� FLUSH N ASPHALT a 1.uME J'I , S 11970'w 559' 5/TER w/W'C I RUSH N ASPHALT HELD GRAPHIC SCALE 4 ,a r • N •cdin Or • lj_/ 13IN Fa?) 1 100b- 20 LL ..),c ist.15 Cstfoceitra&NS Rao.) WARING WW1*OwG PROECE 96175 • TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY SURVEYED tar •ANDY PARIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 15962 BOONES FERRY ROAD FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. LAXE OSMEGO. OREGON 97035-4= PH: 678-3741 BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 12, T.2S., R1W., W.1 CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AUUST 21. 1998 REVISED: OCTOBER 19. 1999 .. 7r` ; N..rT Amms Milli Pw9H ,,,,�, arm MAWS PI ASPHALT �� I 5 0079.00" E nrAYe Tr.YO 382.88' .� REGISTERED 10.00' 1 a1 r �� ��.✓ Sr ------ V 4Y PROFESSIONAL LANG SURVEYOR Owns ...ram �O, 1� ..�M RIM II AWFULT ummr �' n.A.ta.e yam{ NOM N R QM' A°.u.R r..0 AIV natr. ACCONOMO TO THE CTr Or TIOAO,THE AREA OREGON I "1O°`° S 0079'06'E / � \ EAST 6 794 AwaE 1S NOT w TE 100 IVA J S/d2R r/!M Fy 0• rs OCm 7L ES TE 100 TEAR fVOOO PINK HAROLD P. SALO MOH N ASNALT r. L �� OS iEE NEST 90E OT 7714 AVENUE IS 1}{•OQ• are N=IMO'R Ham N`-, ty S/N'La 141 � !i� y ELHTAOPANEL/IS qO2 70 0LI1A8 OAIED YAACH w:A.M x m 0.46 r. ♦ • \ OOw at e°a.'R r!V�i "�e •MR Oa./ ,Loa.- \\ \ YMml I ramp, , d. ..� _ ' c. names Y Al• • ��-\\\\ .\\\\ Sl'•' D A :::::\\:,,,,,,,, pi erHrR n'�� OOLPIOP NO EEVAROV �.o. +tiUS a OKAPIS OATH A•A[A&£ I _ A� ♦ DUE TD RRUSN LEGEND COMM=OR WOO A.RaR l 1Ql.AYr.K ' '1 ' • YCMAOrT MOO AS NCI= I AIL OEN AT! A r LP. POI PIPE A....er VUi-fl> Do POI WE 147 a.aer e ours Einar • nr7rR nacre. CAS I '' ' _� 11111114k. \ ^' Q.l�® w 'f/p•T. MODD HA,TrPOE y` _ ` �•4uioc) II AErAL LOT POST "'N�•:. ti \ • �a� ^l\\ I �� r.T,s . WY MOWN Ne.M... n•.arR \ ` t , n.0 A.a..w SPOT aLTIANOT-MASI n. m \\��`�911` "+��• �-- 3�F.oa • -0- C71AN IANR MICE 1 y I Uwaar. lee/� FEA4A Pcwei A.N• SPOT EMOTION-M OT EMO 7 6 OCt7 58 •� SPOT EMOTION-mwo MOT I e ' _PrP� i 01—'f_ \\., AN1c I O� �/��w • 64 IN 3/1/42P. ..e SPOT EL1YA 71OI-TrsATr Q 1ceeAr as I nr7... AtrA� Isms 490. NO..0 W . 7 EL VAHNE ARE ON OI O7 CEPANT/NT CF TR NSMITA71 S OAHN AD/M LOOK y ..er EVEN Y431.MO!Y7 4T N 074 A Y MUSS d9[. NOM= ..us 2 71.E wOw4wIQ AS 910w GN!MS HAP•UIE APPROWA7E C}Lf: OE w"A.Ir nrM• 97C/7OO MOSIA NOM Of.XFNff7'7O PaW'R1t17,our INS ONE/Tr OR.. :arrJ 0em•Pal r.S S THIS Amer IS WAX WTr Ni ORENOMA PIIIO/AYNr CF 71F 4N1[r oar. Ptl w!I" i pQ H"S Yi / EIaD MR WIC m Afar PAIR!ASSOQATIM NC• NT°NO LIMN UT'POP!/TINA IOM SN SNOW THE RIWNT ANr OROr A4ANAlO�Q CN SUMElENE PNI'OK99Q 0 ire � A swam O yaw ewer r PIwT NAS SEAL APO SEaw7urE OF=mat auaUN>t 1 NO Antler NAS SEOr YAK AS A PMT?NAS SLIMY JO NOMA COI i / ‘1-.1(1.2.9 COG• rff iirrr ONTO=SIZE[x DEPT(mama GWENT a X45 5 Nr0•HiTOP ACCA INN NYSE unums Q PAOLO=PLEASE CONTACT A` I 2` NE N7RO.RtM AGOK13 ,J� _ u 198• S. N1EPIPO^M SINTER ATE~OM MO MC NOT SNOW To 04C r. SSmT d NC rAE£AAO CIIHRCrTK COW/POO IS NOT CLEW=Q ' _� COMO=K A PMT OF MCI SLAq(T NO STA7OdT CI I NCE COVCOIMM INC EEa70MC S OT c.MOOIOTOAI O OR OEOREAO CC TAlBlT Or TANUIES THAT WO.AREL7 77E Or CCIELaAOHT CF N E rm.= a�a+Nr iY� R NOS SAIIEr DOES NOT COMMUTE• NRE SEO.!r SNIETOt II. N OE WM EMT LA4HOAS COCO NE Or NES7RETE MS NAT Cate Ia4E"I;; PRO o S D LA n p/��T i T \ ()AI A,rELT NE 7EEE 77Q 44040/7": NO A 77OrT NAS ND/W(L N +� nw5 SLEET TO MOW SUCH HATTERS THAT Law orrcr 717LE TU▪R9E N ASPHALT a:re � S A.70'r aSY VEL E WINE Woof N ASPHALT MD GRAPHIC SCALE (DI FESr) C tsala-/4C0 z R.O[CD.NHS D••• M1777W0.• • SURVEYED Br: TOPOGRAPHIC SITE SURVEY ANDY PARIS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 15962 IjOCNES FERRY ROAD j LAKE 6SWE�O. OREGON'97035-4351 FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES. INC. c = X BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC Z o WD W Z o rat] IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 12, T.25., ROE, WJ. gn c 4! CITY OF TIGARD g m I 27. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AUGUST 21,_1998 , U1 w REVISED: OCTODER 19, 1999 J Z O I n' war. NEW 516N 2-b'POSTS AST, 1..t.1 O O �' .sw. aawla LL n li.trt • Q4.-0. rr.r.r,c bD'-T 15/16• H r, ri T 4'WIDE L.S.STRIP W W U c y~j 0 5/5114 RLON .9Arr .....440. n,_ c 1.11.7017d0, U ' W ASPIULT Z w; HELD `! 5 0079'00'E n" I.a 8286' rAa•aeo I EXISTING DRIVEWAY =:L -_- — — — -•�.�- _. _ - _ — — — — __ — �^ r/ oQ' (I HR. F -- .Ir��/• 1.P GY ♦ 3 W APPROAU --- - —1 .,,,,,.24.' ..7v`. . . • • '6� r _I`y `-.,,:.� 0 a 3 c _ . i i llOOls'I101m 1 10.00' ' I.r� •����� _ I � PROFESSIONAL Y n..rsa r _� MMM�..I� i Y NOTE iLAND SURVEYOR VOA w/CPC ry q� � 4•WIDE WALK ■�—I' 1 ACT ING TO 71 E OTT GF TIGNO.TIE ANEA N 7J7!'w G%'T W 0 7 C01OnR"reS_› 'e'°'Wm ' p -•� 1 FAST OF 7�nd AVETp1E IS NOT IN 7NE 100 TEAR atm nL J 'T7��P D `i TL000 7LAW.TiE LD00 FLAW =•m ••_•— '160.00' --• . - = -- nr pA /Is.,us ad AW EIS u o! oREOON 55/3114 Ww rp T I• ,jam— —i- — — a� :, —— '.�, . Li., UILDIN6 _ \ 'iA P I ....r.. N=roar w IIMgr. : \ S4. 3,"fbb S.F. I 'O HAROLD P. SALOP J GM' r.ar.ac .\\ , Bow��c�//J 'ad U y r AOM a 2109 ti a ' 41 ",4,�__ /�z.vrr ur.cs .1 _ C .� Z : /' r T ae. II 1 SOLID WASTE I 1 . o. rI Cm 4) NO CARDBOARD 4, P F 5 K T. /2 -TORAfiE AftEAi Lal tf MAIBOX rr swo I-.; I V Yr W;T: , 1 �� �L moo_ 0 �N-- • ro W CC . 4moire�� ,,� • I►' PROPOSED ,. . . %"�'/ ,'� • 219 �' �PJI�L?IN6 I, �O` 'Su l MM7ER 3 Z Vj4_- 5.40 S.F. ` 1, 7116 .a� /6 SIKE ED'1 NT I .aoa :::;:j."r; a i } '� I PARCEL 2 _ oICI..3 v \ ,,, :0.604 SQ.FT. TOTAL �b ��� n'— I c,r.... . . 0 r..nr ` , 1Q'1C Pet'r rr.).A?O SoL r WA S r RF- _ .. r ` NOTES • I - , I. ELEVATORS ME ON MEOW DEPARTMENT Cr 1RAIL>PGPTA1ra6 OA1W MO Z I MN= 5 M LEGEND: BETIOH MAW NO. r-47 SET IN 19744 J BRASS DS7C• '' • - • MOWIE T FORM AS OPTED 2 17E BOWOA11[S AS 91001 ON BAs MAP MTE APPROMMTE OMr. OAS --Z AA I /' MAP OCQ NOT REPIESTTIT A STRMEY TO BE RECORDED.BUT IRAS DOE FOR O EL > — 30•20 ''•. FT .. '� •;/ ,- ROY ROD 9>F^O•o WFOAIAIION ad r. Ul i�j I5-1 N?7E _—/ LP. RON PIPE S 1195 SURREY 6 MADE MR DE MONK PIAPOKS>]. Cr RE SU11EY OIl N p 1' ARM'PARS t ASSOCIA TE;INC.ASSUMES NO UAB5/TY PM WNDMLA RCM El 0 I •'� ---- D4 MTER VALLE SHORN HEREON TO MY OT1M1 11671TUROVS CR S RSEO1ENT PUROHASERS \ uxj Z `O % • - -. -1-LO P PGA e 9N TER AE7ER OF RE PROPERTY. I 5 4. SLIMY 6 YAW GI.r E ENWT HAS SEAS.AND S RATURE CF 9R,ETOE - - 1. >•.. '(Nt ® cAS METER W '" -.A- ♦ - S N10 Armor HAS DEEM MALE As A PART Cr MO 9IVt£r ICI mTAW Q \ .r •. .' 198.1 Mt, R7W UTILITY POE 91014'DATA COVLEIMMNC EALS7FN(L STS OEPRC C101LY71O'4 GMPAOT/:DP ED 0 . r e LOG 1704 OP ANY LOW Y O7 NYJOP AL/RAEIC 47PYIf1 FAgJ1Y. E'M m® Q METAL fAOIT POST WTOEIATION RECANTING THESE U1l=OP FAOETES PLEAS ODVJACT V, n/an MIORq RE APMOPIIATE AOEM GI < C 0 .L.1;,.T� 4 THE LOGITIOV MO CR COSIENLE Cr UIRITY SERMCL WAGS ro THE raay.[ SPOT QEVA77ON-fM9i ROOT PROPERTY SRIE7ED ARE Inseam"MD ARE NOT SHOW% 1', O' ' 'c- CHAIN LOK MICE 7. SORRFACE ANO EMe014 E7NTAL CON016014 IIERE NOT MIMMED O9 aAa QLC14e I� I E- CGV.SIDORD AS A PART a-IE95 SLIMED: MO STATEMENT IS MAX 11 1 1 "roar ` •.era SPOT QEYA BDV- RP Cr DANK ■ ' 1' • OR FAQE1IS 1NAT�W7��AFFECT )E USE OR OF 77111 TRACT V I— 13 a '4. I marl SPOT E2EYA 77ON-fROM SNOT D. HMS GURNEY DOES NOT CGVSA/UTE A 1711E SEAROI BY SRWYCR. — I i '1, '6 a r9t SPOT ELL-VAT-RN- T BA0r O'' •RCAL CLOY V• 95.1 ' wA97NAL -•' p r.s� _ r� p ��q11 77E ARf PROPERTY ATTEMPT HAS 5 B(E7/MADE 114 1 MrlA +44 Fu I-IN•c #-1 Q4•01�' S easB'w TEST 1/5ZR w/IPC 7 PIS SORRY TO 9Naw S7OH MATTERS 7NAT MAY ANTECT ARE. Q FLUSH W A9VNALT _ SITE ANALYSIS HELD S I T� FL N Revised: loi�oiaa w P EL 9111E_7ABLE SITE AREA• 81524 SF. =4rI SCALE: "=40'-0" EXIST-INS BUILDING• 14384 Sl. ID% PROPOSED BUILDIN55• 14,166 5F. 25% Destroy All Previous Plans °I 4/30/44 o �- LANDSCAPE AREA(ABOVE 1•.0.5)• 40,4A0 SF. 5A% AS NOTED THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF TOTAL SITE AREA• 40.416 sr ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. AND ARE '"' 21.210 EC15T1N6 9111LDIN5• 14339 SF. Ib% A-H I -9 5- A'ROPOSED 3UIL7IN55• 1466 6F. 21% NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY , c ASPHALT A GC40RE7E PAVNS• 40,470 SF. 45% MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN "iv° LANDSCAPE SPACE• 16.059 5F. WA PERMISSION OF ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc., A—I 9IIU50r■ PI hu.Bvl, npnN polio ___19 it O O I 10'-0" /I 25' 0" 24' 0" 23' 0" li _ 0 y y x oY H ij d: k I F --\ 0 r 1 rit4 - • 0 ii„ jp 4, 11 _• Ki 0 CO A ,,i, 60' , ---- _ 11'F i f \- Q 11 'Z �x- f X (VI\/ xxI V I r a0 Ot 7 ui I1 Kd i i � i„ o # I u 1 'I L i r ,- i 9 _., l ..z0Zn 0 CI i p,bo{ju 1::- `J7�j' i F —\- O .,1,2,1.$1,i,ui 29-. ti -. c pt — a u gAo m A2Am Q� 1 VI 9 -1AaP1 O - onyu C \ na214 11 UC-C4 Z wwwwwwolowimmomwmaa ll le 1 ° \ EMPIRE BATTERY T.�,`,. CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS /�.,..�. `3 1 Multi-Tenant Buildings j� �'� ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. ARE SUBJECT TOCfVWOE©Y UILDNGNANUF. HI 1 -:-1 Tigard, Oregon o ES1: 7360 S.W.Hunziker Suite#101,Tigard,OR 87223 "o arc RHSONS LI e - iV 1 ;"..4F° Phone 503 068 3118 Fax 503-068-6630 _ FLOOR PLAN BLD. #1 00050, I I I vor uvt. ADAM ull,ltn 9') 10 10 18'-O" i[ f 19'-5 1/2" T-4" 10'-8" • i`--- fi T-4" f 12'-I I/2" 19'-5 1/2" _ 1p:> .._ -....._•__• _-- i pi - - -- -__ . j :_ _ t- . °rn _=a - - --__r a 1 =__ __ -- _ r- < __ 6 ._.-7_-___=__7= � o _=__-__.. ___.__ _.._._. -,i a _ ______ .___. _.___._ 1_1 __ __________. ___._ _______ . ..______ a.,:) ----- ....._.._..... .. .. . ....... . .. . ... ....________. c0 111 :__ _ _ —1 -_.: c11 __= Hi -_-_ F11 i 1 — - -_ ' i j ______________ --..6 6 j l8'-O" —s� U - El ,' 4" 10.-4" _____ �� L�l E o _ -_- L-1 0 J ct� ct P Al - --- y.:_ _:x_" _0 .t... 0 1p 0 ' 11Z ip ''T 'IA _ _ . - nl -„ too P _ qr n Ol -I n —_---- .---_;.T:yy to Nc• cC top ---- - WI-( , N 41 _:_-.__— 1 61 X � 'I) _- L �[ _---- ! =- _ ..:02-IAN 0 __ __ _—___ "-._ 11 _— .._ - �moAm U r -. P �A mO llrt ,,,-4,,, ,,,, — A _. —_ _---- z > Q �. _-----_..--- — s. m ro m ) • - =(1Aj _ y - yy C - c Aoom i 1)2 Q� L 19'-9 I/r m m0 7 �-(( to > m _2ij tT . y I �g EMPIRE BATTERY •o n CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS 40 Multi-Tenant Buildings i�'"- ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. ARES �oECTTO►CHANGEPTUr,�LDING ANUF. I ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY BUILDING MANUF. o 3 " Tigard, Oregon •ES,•t 7360 S.W.Ili nzlker Suite#101,Tigard,OR 97223 NO m! "'"5'°M: lug E .•i:� *�"` Phone 503-968-3118 Fax 503-968-6639 ELEVATIONS BLh. #I - - - c Q �Z LL I . , 0 ' . ot 2 O 4 9 O Z o I W Z N O J_ Q 14'-O• 80'-O- D m dam 26'-0" 28'-O' 26'-0- J U(W7 4 = UU vW Q_ N 0 \ N. - ,. , „ \ U w <W p = .'T u� WI Hr-FnZww6-:---------- ------------------------ __ __ ----- 6_ dI 'N U *< a 0 / / 7 in r - 1 r — i r — -I 9'-0•X6'-0" II I I I I 9„1L°> ss°R 2 I I- 3'x10' SKYLITE I I I I , p V N I PANEL ABOVE TYP. I I I I / n — rn co r 4? 0 I I I I I I w IX LJ I { L _J L _ J �x j SINK / ? b LL , Cl) �, O n ;- I 3UILDING ` °w N co 7 j I 3,166 S.F. j CC =VI ©(� Z c s h , k • r- — -1 E — -1 r —-1 I I I I I I w I I I I I I §_ "` ••\.....c...� TO'-O"CONT.TRENCH I I I I i 114 0 o DRAIN ail L _ J L _ J L _ J 0•'• %'I= mulmmmmmIIm M11111 ®IlNlmlmlllmimm mmnnllMl mll111111 lmlm®ImmI1W111mmm1nmN `o! !•' 8Mi a O! 22'x14'O . W/WINDOWS 22'x14'O.H.D. W/WINDOWS 22'x14'O.N.O. W/WINDOWS �/ / HB O 'Ilk N. \ + H . M1 H.9. POWER a LIGHTING LECSEND C . 4) = DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE ���/ p '; = DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - 1L al D C ra Q = TELEPHONE Q = EXIT LIGHT _ FLOOR FLAN BUD. #2 m rn Z = METAL HALE LIGHT �� SCALE: I/8•=1'-O" d c 0 I I = 8'-O" (2) BULB FLUORESCENT 11.: IF In 6 0 IL = 2'x4' (4) BULB FLUORESCENT w/ )W a/ LAY-IN PLASTIC REFLECTOR V/ I-1 L. O = INCANDESCENT TOILET ROOM LIGHT WITH (L 6 O Is EXHAUST FAN i )iii = GROUND MOUNTED DECORATIVE LIGHTING Revised: silb/aa Ill I 1— ll- )..r-L = WALL MOUNTED DUSK TO DAWN LIGHTING Destroy All Previous Plans — 6,,..0.4 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF aui I..o.,. AS NOT=' 4pOSOs s I. PROVIDE OVERHEAD.ELECTRICAL RUNS WITH (5) NOT TO BE USED CORRREPRODUC D AINEANY tdi I -, EI I IOV DUPLEX DROPS (I PER HOIST) MANNER. EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN SKR. S PERMISSION OF ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. A-4 3. `SIO'dl`i III VOl Mile Alin. nu.Il.A'II II,!II, • • 1 t I8'-O" 1 • 11'-4" f 19'-9" l'-4" 4'-0" ___ 18,-0„ — ^ r _. 1 w LA1 N- J L j 7° I I t • r lu _ A [� T III "1 j I— . T.. . _ _ _. . _ . . _ _ . . _ _ 0 _. __....__ rn _- — - - F - _ _� z t, b o 0 ______ 1 RI iI ¢ Iq' 9"ill a [1 t IGI'-q" 0 . U s ,. a. V© �Jn a o W D r 1 11.1 r r - rn i ._ 0 .. __ _ { - 1 iii -I ,,,,,,.:::.,,„:„...„.v-,..,4 Inmpmm N N vs: (P 0: I Q` A N -. - -...__ ..... _- p _ •_• ZXmOE o f C� D O➢ I I C ,11;:1,4-40 CZ %I lPyy�1N lr I_ 19' 9' I 2,Inn-i> D 4-0 Z O i�0 •I ��ff CL -1 cig In Am + l 11-4" [ (<I 3)1-o m n Y p o (� — f ot"As < 3 3 rn ?'-4" I 10'-B„ im AO^A O (T u, ?� t (\ h '(v Ill cc m m Z m LP si us -1 t f•o 4 I 18' O" -1* cAza� -D 3 memo n "2< w a 1 a 1 EMPIRE BATTERY CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS a��reuc>• a r a e/� ;? DRAWING ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL USE ONLY AND Multi-Tenant Buildings W=�'"' I ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY BUILDING MANUF. a Es, • NO. OAK RMS.ONS � � 0 Tigard Oregon o e 7360 S.W,Hunzlker Sulte#101,Tlgard,OR 97223 — -- $ ' ;: TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY Avv_n r'AfA3 AND ASSOCIATES.RJ® c • 13902 130044ES FE?RY ROAD z =•:?: ENG.`•:c= 1uCtURES. INC. Cl) <i LAKE OS'.tfoo.ORECCN 97035-4351 DH: 636-33., BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX NAP 2S 1 12AC -7 o • • iN THE NE 1.'.1. _EC. 12, T.25., R.l1Y., W.M. w? n,:ncr-71 r I WASHINGTONICOUNTY. OREGON 'L' <= C -, - ellse ..1t)II u.A "" W _ •qqpp I 21 ,v .s,.r w5�or s�av _ CC Z vie^...- �Gl ._....___._-_ trm6 .t•m4euu r .w.ar ....t a SSE a^rrSwat n.>'.•a. `� C' ('lU. f f v� SC GOMlCf t6+LEVS.:1.1•@+f / - __ (,..� ! .ea` L�., L. Pli7L2 1E761T Ci wr M'c I __ /2:.A. Z' I:•:; . ` y,. -, ,:8------------- •- �.•' yT _--f------ -- {LF1C G7� •{ v rJ'`u• b nT _ mar✓ _ '1'7-.. '2, ram 1 '1 c`< ...4.r _ -- � .u.arr.w� 'f %iusiR y. I.•,c • _ �--.•-.- 1 1 - 1, .cc;.:...4.'a NE an Or TOMO, n.E.REA 4 c- y Co.crSR•.M .a•AA 4.a. 1 h J �� 1 EAST Y;'.nA,•.W.E K NOT IN NE 100 YEAR v/TM.Y 276' '.I I N iux ∎/1 �_ .r... \ II\\I q ,_,• wvo+.o+ S r0•<q'r.5• _� _ '� I __ _ Erie Sr. '•YO \ \ 1 ; \nr.mo \• Rom tax ',E'CO YEW Raab RAw �� _ ! (� J.1 NE •EST 510E X O7ne AWNS IS 134.00, f4u5„NwAASIr.t' F I \\\\\\\ \\{CPC<\\'�<\�\\ / r----- r A ^•e .Q C \ FEU...9�..E1•■S.103 7E 00070 0A1FD 1W0. _�`y��. ••. r • - \ (\� 1s a ` v ls.- •01 ... K \mr. t r \tr'.\\\ \ \�\ tea. \ \ • ` .. f ,.M,.e ° \ I�/�� \\ `\�■\\ ` U n CI • .4.!0x1-` \\?"\\ '\, ..rs -I .w.:.a .�..,o.e F4 " " " I ' EXISTING CONCRETE BUILDING 1Z -.. • Taw a 1 f 1 \ r v Iv MI!rw7E mI` N.at I I \'""\ \ \ ' S I ' «A4..•'! I1Y 1 ��'a. - - - '/ ' / sar•• N =• • • I • _ ..,4.a a 1 !: I ..4..a -•Ca b. N ... W 3 - ;. Z - I I 1146101 MMUS'. \ \, ..964.=G. FT. "CTRL _ - IL I_ _ \i \ \ •,000: EC. -. 70 TCA CF 3ANK . \-algta,bitif MILL ?GULL MOMS IMAM I7. 4 •r ll CC10aT:0 SIMI MaE .• .8 w`a, r -- 1 .m _ -- ' �t I t a _ • __ __• :1,U 4TpV},ME CO ONEEIOV:OM11.CNf Y R.4M6A'XrA 110MS M/u.1 FaO1, V�+ L•I_I .• - - '�' + ?.1}.` •bz -- _ 10•04 ..�r�n -4r sr H•Iva.r NAST a sr q t. 0 •vpne+ /y- .'Y. /� --, • :•r._e '7:.•.9 •:4..7' L .M 9dTOANtS AS 9.Oa1T OM T.S TAN ME AT.aO>v1Arc ONC I: TRS �v0 jam•• •A - _ ,-_ i�!\ I v - t ^ •'\ --- I •C •'`, 4..v 7o[s.Or+E►a[Sflrr•s.rYET!O if AYOOO[al•/i T4.s aaYC raa I SAAR I N. s M.FT. I •'' ='--_'.' 7 -n•.�✓ a :r•,� VT/70.0:Nf1JaY.nfri OK f. 141 w \ -. .-.-3.-:---_-,,.:.-_---_-_---:.-.:,-,:::-.------_ .• ; ._ •a - 143 stwYEr,s.W(MOP M ouo�ul Nwoum►0,IC swKr oar.•- MOr AWNS T AaLTCATES.c+mots w UMW"' arolwnoN gS I net - ...�- -Y -_-_ ::1.:.."----" i j,..� 1•. >a ..r_o-.,.e • 0•0044.134(04,:o.wr Ono aamunoe or Zr.{�a IMICNAeRt• r3gq w I I " i. '�• �." y = �- t ., a.�� >�E..�r,, :5_ - _.- "" G,/• 'arm",,s MAO CALF s Pqm,MAS XAL NO 90utt.IT Or Strrece T I ;� S rV• s i.t T4. i v4..nn r.....T LPDO wet a./MT 4.r?4 SWOT TO OfTAN OR•\' I- 1 - '-..�� ,v •o. ^ J• .•:..:: stoat ONIN 07•1331~I ZSMCC 9S.]0044 COMM a✓.arY.a n ,Na 4.T T Aar WAVY E a1dMAO „ene LI= r aurr. /4.r • -._" -- - ; - _ - - ,. d-•4_?•f a S' *Nana nEmuLL+r.a nG4�4unE5 Or vAauiQ PtG4R coErACr :L': Z - T.E AarO•.•AR AaO11OQ ' I ,•Taast ` i�- •- - � - _ • i K cauna•..o-•osid.Q Y uoUrr mtNICT ula ro nE Q _ �-�- � X17 s.sett--.....1.,...:.7. •a0•pr,aAhETm ANE U••0•Xse..O AK.nor 9O.Na 01 1 I ,...1.i I '•- ---::::%.7,-•-:;:-.:77-7--- - _ �w-!v[S J ylAn./.cZ AAO EN7Odnpr4 AOTga.QE NOr CSA.•a at OKR .I •: - _ aNSavRtn S...NT J TaS Ssr.EY 40 VATOO.T 3 W4. r C A '• 't7 - .-.•.[_v. -7-r 3.n+ :pK2R..NC T.E DISlD.?Y.NOO11Ora,WT•OR O.ObEAO COON ERS ri, •� Y... .:1_-• �+ ••-__ - . ._:■MA,- :AMINO;.or x rACIUMS■T.Ar wr•ATEOT'.E USE Oa 001100ar 0/n4S IRACE ,Li u ® :•�LltI�, -_• - TAS SAW,ICES'.Or�Y.TPNT. ORL 9:101 W',hoot LU. 1/eT N wJ.+r . \ .•• .4-•.c..S _-..rho_ •7 1.ar T.OTT•O.:T:4• T.EJ.E 4.A r COST EASOOTTS asnnda as 4[SOEOR?6 OMT OdeO L. •. C .g Ru9...v.s...e ; 4•.:• .nrcr'NE.VIt OF"WS Paa.E1•.T q AMY,NAS TOOT MACE a. T- 11170. :7S' 7/074. +.s;TArYcr-O 9.Or 9.0.NAJtOT,wf wr.vreet 1St II- (11 0 .N AS/.u4f 1 s CIR�Y'w i. PLAN N Q yA urLS nfr• in C 0 ias • y 41 eri L - OC O miparcsuammtic L(aL ___.L- OmTDO CA7NIGR L?n a NM CONTOUR t.3 s • U701 am= U- �•A r�.• - smarms war U.VATII'R4 ,A .411‘A ► ►➢R wawa '•� NM lO►1LOVATS7L L3; ® �w A/0S12000 nw�SrA VA I3M lye G®i+ WIWI•VAtL2 I NAV. 60VA1Q.M 11! NUNIPO•Rt.IC PA0 ead. •!G bum ® • VALVE saw=not AS NOTiD O� „T Or MINI * Law ram 4..£•NI8 6[ VAN `IL_EET INC. a� 000 teOrTG/0 C.� O�. OLE m u10.0.1®4 < < MPS 1••■rr4r erxs.T5011 emarns a oft..(sw a -.ry.� - _-- - - -. SURVEYED BY: ANDY PARS AND ASSCctA1 S1 TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY 13962 BONES FERRY ROAD I �aDO=f SAM LRI -- - LARE CSMECO.OREGON 97033-4331 r PH: 636-3341 I a o'lO ^ . • • FCR: ENGINEERED STRv..n�RES. INC. U) < z a I BEING T,1:{ WT 300. TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC Z oz 0 r-� N THE NE 1/4. SEC. 12. T.2S., RAW., W.N. • w z Y j CITY OF TIGAP.D < z 5- § WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON � A I� >, I _::::1:,,..J__ ER 399 W w •� \ Q 2 Z I I t;:,`.7475.`-':..%. ..,.,r \ s/e I (� L�eale sa'e4aLx uAme aiu--TY-eto , (L O At gi •y... TO CG/CT N61 .v...., flOT7Ci4gp_lVy�°1 • i .r_7- :4 l, TO neLrc RsG41 s°e'wQ''6�'r s - a�._-crr3 wx.I • U U - - f _ _ sTwrnsr uv o z' CTJTIALL ro asec z w C)�:i.u..aa .-. - .—.�.�._-�.._. .�. ' ----- .r.� - , arra air_ a,oai O a 3 .v n ro ._:e' I '1 we. w "°"°°'° cu .� a sem ca - t Fos I 1 -c \ °1 a lsae -____i 1 ArloROR a ro Nc a7v or ncARO. NE AREA `Z Veil ft.r/"PC WSJ r�M11 A 3,167 _____ __-__1-_ .LOCO PLAN. 0011E1A 7FL000 Pi1/M M rtu5n•N AsR-.c' • I \ ON NE A{ST s0E'Oi 77n6 AVENUE IS IlI.00'. • i a+0 �,� N � I Rai �//^ddd''' � µta a aiox 7e 0ome oAhn uARa YrRaesc \ a Wa I •.YI I .TOIN PIM- AL.L , �, >) _ f \ \ \ I ro Lan IOC �1; 7,_ . t_ i ,,,,,. \\ 1 /„' a Lam ^tea, @ �E�.• I \ \ r / °. 12/SVbo \ • `\ '' w _ _ s Lai _ , i \ \ \ \ \ .•1 m - I r 1. EXISTING CONCRETE BUILDING I� j/ • o I X.A.r..c.w..a. r • • LL 1 d \ 1 / , - Z AO= / 1111011111111111.113:J i { \-- ' c.o. - 15,400S.S.F. LI1 m 11.• I:cb . r Z n o I \ PARCEL 2 Z ��,• \ -.934 50. FT. DOTAL Z g a •,0002 so. FT. TO TOP OF SANK LLI • 1 I I 3a 1 r'�:t j4s 3 aa _ tl `f 1 - JL.dr Or-u�xrAnpvs oARnr mar • d 8 1K �r i �.rAC7c. s 141/1.0 1 ` \ ./3- .c t - - c Maid SO C O!s �ws nc r awasr Off I:�`� 0:�u 11 �,0 1 a r�u�^fiQ�R< PARCEL * ,` , 1 +�•�' _- ro•+uwevr:;x+0.s•row z -.c eaw.RC[s As DPW w;>rrs•,w ARC.waRonw7e �•' ��' ; 1 \ 41. 2 FT. 1 i �, - rAr OCES...or Irrftli it A surf,”70 Sr re:0,0lA Bur MS 1•••••FOR '`� s` It f N ` 2(, '0 97Ei a•o asawaA7av Mr. r` AWNS \ \ � •Zr'�� M mow 17d i . ri ' :MS sulcl•rs+Alor Fa O AUIIOLasE71 cr n(SUMO'O.e r. Yy1 ZH ' .a- c- ` pQ ::::::77.:;:f:79: .AAQ aS9POA 1[S+AC AsArCr iry tiVU/r/Or xAIDarA7�pv S7.ORN ryREpr AA1I OR4R Ai6u7tnIV4 M sAL>faadr P4MarasM I'...:r ....,,s....--Tv OE RRarrR7r 98-�.. i/^l�\` ..----4, • s a pwltr n rro GAY r rrwr ma 9AL.w swArtBet Or sw.eroe V t '.O ArrOIT.*s Em1 1MLr•AS I/ARI O••In Slant?ro COr a O' �` 'TL +OCO::"u7r.x4.- 9AR'OAr1 CaM•CFJIlIFIG Eg7dCL 9S OPM 0O107NRD16 Ga/Ap77 Or • -1 `aasTaLnmis �' C .•[-•c_,,,r MsT ;,vr:riraµ r g'"u~it�na cxrai aercAi1OUSr�aov�icr If A"RRONR.AR'AGENO� .�o.� H•411. +� . ..v...crow 1. M LOTJAa*AA-c-a1 i:Ncr Or[Mir,90r•aE:ever To,PC "iw TON--„r5„-_c PICLAGIT MIMI=ARE wAO+Or AAO ARE NOr 9AOR t i MOST *T NM .c L - / AA51/MA¢me dL•�O.IIPIrAL CQO/pQ RQf TOT GU1t1 KD OT STA!I� ""�` a Fyf r_v.nd- .-Y?3Awr '37v4,R71@ AS A~I'Or"TS sM.CY O SrAR7lRr TS MADE Z a►rT I.1'• ' COA2:10 R0 7NF cm7daE Or:oCIRaan9 a OWOINEAO 03vrAltRS (�� • uR rAau7acss NA I'wr 4/31 a. ♦Mf J .-�:'.' J!!av- 71d+M 4tl AMC?AfrCCT:hf IIF OR MQOAdr Or/115 TRACY: — RU9r:N•S.1i.)• ,t y 1 ors SUNE1'DOES MOr O7KAR/1[A ARE YMOI M S/11(ld 5 99ZO”w .._) •i.4s,- • ;iOf_rare..- "Y GC,7'41,,C-At•' - WERE NA MST EAYYdri O' ot770S Or RIESMC7R5a5 A•Ar COULD L 3 C sat,R 9.:M w5A•ALr AFFECT NE A7lE Cr WS•ra•Rrr .A•nrhoor w1s am rAOE.. r �l �� ��.�••�� �� A.r st•r1[r.'O maar sAOI rwr7ENS 7NAr bur MF[CT MU `— 11..1 0 In ru A-I 14 i I•1l.141,'� .r...rsps..� 'Q .., CP as a 29 r c -S.N_ 1■4 sAarAreY m� „1 CZ Hi• 1 � 0 ----SAL- mtaralA fARrARr �' ---EEGS— N■4 STOW s/1 • • CAM*SAWN ———.W5— mfaTDd slr#M saw 0 0 .+malt WEE Nil-I TTR Gla LlIka UtSi}y rain �Iw ■»R NaTTA1 OO MRw T'(7 - tea.. 7r 6AS `�• � V I ui a— 4 la T*A/wCmas•MO mac L MK ationneee / OmTDa7�T�•• � ISfM RSA w Mi.a DN�lT ta1lAl7l7N -0: �� LHLL LIClB110 l,>aif AS NGT® i.A. C.O. CLAW CUT • ` me L7AIR►�4r cosscr a4 IAN MAN NOLt MI VA.Yt as CD CJ11316aBID1 v CON & VAN VLEET INC. �� AsT,a CLEAN= COIN 9ULTINO[M pIN[ER■ • now TOOL 1110 AIMS f ry,eRR 4AV• f= N I C 2 SURVEYED 9Y: TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY ANDY PARS AND ASSOCIATES,IN® 0 • 15962 800NES FERRY ROAD Z j LAKE OSWEGO. OREGON 97035-4351 'GR: ENGINEERED SPr UC7URES, INC. U) <_ PH >.c; 636-3341 BEING TAX LOT 300. TAX MAP 2S 1 12AC Z o 2 2 ' 1.N THE NE 1/a. SEC. 12. T.2S., R.1M.. W.M. VA o 1 • •'H"'Tf-71 CITY OF TIGARD Q _,5 I I WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON ry <a I I AUCUS• 21. 9;a 0 a a t • I E:iSEJ: _C.t,cc' r_, '999 . v .i Qzz y1 I Iii D U q lit I I '•.MI..c..,e.i .R..f 2.O i4 i I'1r�66y�„__Y ws w'�ORga .-T' \ W 1.0 o as wu� r• .___.`1_11__1..-.-______. W !/rtR �ql3 __.____1111.7711. -1�HCI-TC-3mBtALK .-.•I bSS7 441i11Y11 °"." c� " g_ 1 Y.1A�.4 _ _ 7D CQ6�f N61 C>N�LT1 etf .r_.M, - "e4o ��;� To r(�L2 raaTT O►ear S :9'c ,et 36 -/ •� 4� •N nano ,Z Z? ! �'"�� 7777 7777- - --- 013U' - 1' •-I'd ... 7 1 1 1_ - _1._. �`.-,- _ 7 .S y "/.t+_$w7Dl'J`� �,� C-3 0 r_.��1 I i VW--- -- - - T s _ - - �t.t4-r6 T.4.LL '/3-I N.F/1'FC I• •_ �!'m _ - - ••• - - •��c S� '�� .tOCCOROmO TO'MC an'Of M./JD.iM AMA I 7u5M�M.SP.rAt ;: hr. _ __ t--��/ _ N ` I _-1 134'�J ''.r I- '` EAST Of r;.1..•ORE IS POT H 111E 100 TEAR r� -' o• 1 _ 3.'iii$F. - '' •, ,.M„r,• { \. • ', N.Od1 I•J+L OE ta0`EAR FLOOD PUNS •7\ I _ t, l L OR nE 1EST 90E 0r nod AW4K IS 11100•. • 1/192R M/"r tom1. _ _ MK � - \ .•\' FTa1A a..a.a a•IOI 71 0007!DA7m NA/101 n 3019'00-SPMµr IY I •E I U ' _ X -X \ -� !/!'/ r �•• ,'- ` 1.1962 i' _�_y.\,z�. ■ • Ilir :•C.rt �r \ TA.r 1Z WD . • I s•CfTA71 911 c. x .ss _ .` i`'. /, /�A ,'t 11111 \ I ... L I ' .r_�.cenu r I j�� �\ _ AAT70/MALI r4r,\�, + Z ?V• ': i 1 •� Ir, t+ '1* 4 aT.Aa 9o[c4. u \1 l • MlIPr M1 "1 \ RN �, ,� '.I nM?V rtM:AK - , , IINNT.\\'''sns"." \\ �. =c9 1.v. CA =t%7 I EXISTING CONCRETE BUILDING I'I A` ` ' ?` ai r 1111. Rm. I I I , 1 9 - ` ~ - U CC M .axl ►1 - Z i. c.irxi L ' �iF WU, :d3 rMN• w = CD _ _20.._ • _ w a m • c al - �Zf� 77 J 4,11 : �d nt ...- ... V n PARCEL _ �•�� Z I r1R- 2*_AVe.aAr w I I .tAT r.'�6TDtl ` • 1 =.95A 50. r i. TOTAL - I,ODOS SO. 'f. TO TOP OF 3ANK 1..'. -t- ■ A 1 1 - c.•, ?""%.*---..'„ II .111.1,- I 'f• '� . `\ Jz6TA.LL.•.007174 CRAM 1/; Ot T�,i F .� «-1•AICr TO STORM SEAM ..- I- t k. • i I o, . _ _ µ---.- t ` _--.�� _ _ C EM Hass.wE ov yeas4 rtsurrcto s•..w�'0TADOMS OA tea rvw I1'7*�11 tPk::. p/„ 9.ORff AM 1 __ _1'16.- - _ 1\ \ OA ./ - _ -- _ -- :" - ENO.waR,.1n .-e1 9!r Al rvra.r.#.wsi svc '' ..•.9111V114 l� jR '„ 11( 1 '\ " _ - - srt aww.wcs AS aor.Dv�r NAP ON.awmua aar. -MKS '4,7• -fLL^ •_-: : .--s:_���� ._�-�- �= • �..cnusGv r.-�-uvO s ro rSJ 1 ar •ac `\ -7".-.-Z.:- ;: ".:I._ _ _ rw Ors ear acrRESt7sr A seater v aexax0m jr o au Oar row 1 ..-7-.,...,14_--- -'-/ ttct st.'\F62 so. FT. \ - _ - 4,:v 4o0 lip, \ _ _ _ Ir/rzw0 wFarwna+ONLY..... ,. ¢S1 uR� '-: �1---: ::-- .Q,_•_. 'tea"O_` 1 1..5'SuP1EY K MADE NV 7.r 000NAL 404044.II7r d0 44 9AKY OILY. u I ♦vmn Tb� - --- - _ - y.�G C� _--•:: r .z.o _4111 l AS97CNTES 10 ASSUMES NO uwourr is lM•OTA7IOM y. \ - .-_ _"---"_' - l'y .•M.FACIE ` P.O.N.a[d rO Awr Once 007700O0 OV 9.e>mar PUNOIAmR �ISS55 1 I ',I - \ '9: _ ``'G 1 aril•c ONE'+.[a+ea°Den I• I' I - '� •- .LPL ` " • 9Aetrr.1s vAW at r s*ow w5 SAl wW 90+47111r Or 9Jet(ldL 1: iE} % �...+ --1 ;� __�.7111 :�µ .- • arra 44 , I � iii I D_a �+p s +W.o rA 1411 NAN COS As A/Mr dr 0R AR1(Y TO WAVY M _9 - "� b HOLD v.Tu/r..ors ST.Or DATA Q7HL'OSrW EATS/EM£WE OPnR COMMON.WAOTY.M r•L-ear lS LOCAOON Or Mr frnurr ON MMO•AL/H.�/C OSNA¢FAQJrY. POP . -i _w• g AA•owArFaEr.A�w�u�¢+Ra u UnEl a FAaunEi MUSE CONTACT 1 r . .AQ 1v L 10;CUnw.AO OR COS7002 Or unurr mew¢Jib ro 0 (0 1r.a/A nw--..•9.2CM .eD^aT'ROMPED MR'Urd.Or1 AAO wAr rear SMOAK rte-. I , .I•II %"•∎_ : -> � ; i -- - -`•.w.mow/OV¢ I. arr7uMA¢.MO EAnwOwlprAt 0350 .[iK For fz.wm a 'r - :! - .�^'1CVAnw- CP:F 3w MK CWT 9 AS w PANT dr M.'i.elrr ea ST51123i[1/T.1 FADE r .:a ; - _ - - '-. .'.1c 1r exsmvcr Cr uACOedeawo ae O1ve„Ewo meIAwE7et n/ 11 (( -__ - ;.or_.-..m.-700A+o cm FACJOS NAT wrAFFFET 00 USE xa+aaedr,Y'Vs MACE. CZ !/61R %r P!' --1 ll - . :A^r^a.'.t rw- "J 3ACr:F.ERn*.:::M NOW POT COST EA OWN S O:10001S CR A[Sn6C000 10T!VfAp 7 9.'N.SPrAt- i V..'..:. 44.,- ✓TrCT K nrti Y VS maven. ea A1100T r.S A V(FADE.M „/� O •� S SEW'w 179' :MS 3( CY TO SHOW 200.wr7F I MAT MAY AATECT MCC W `^U/' 541 R .� v•1PM.L' LYON 1►R✓r_PLAN . `.r .rxe ae-d a2 c 0 70 0 (>3 O 1.Ll I T 1 v .......-.�_ omrrn CONTRA ue U10 SA®l 0- 1.7) CZ -----------"5 IS.CZMTOIR L-! - OIITDb:VT r1vA1Ge1 ti AP. row MTLRYff I '11 L I- S+7 NBA!'OT R-195,10011 M I IHiT1• / 170V�STAG 5S WIG'S 2 Ji7L.Tr vM1_T SW , arm?�iee 41-2V. N.rlA7130N -A.eHlcssHlL.uo rw AS' T& "3733 944. floes MAF.t V ; YM. DOI covet 'tOC 1t'1rQalm = =NYe1r LEWIS & VAN VLEET INC. t Y4a': GSM I - -mew=LI.I.T 'ON 61U.... EN O..aCER• 1>re d DOfTOM OP Cl)p _ MM WI•tLLr -o !- Ca CAP 04 RACER < < •1I L7A -r}Hl-r' •iG'."'1. •6.10 ....Ara r•r (503)1196-.20• • C((GT 7lz't1L' I••=1/o ,1d a-.......-..-._-... . - -- • hl N MO ,,,, . :_i_. ,..;......., ,,„,,,, ,? .., 0 , , . a+ bl : U6 .\\*I,O=I=II tii r - 1ii PI iii NI ..., 1 Itlii Iiiiii*Iiii:E : i 1100 lit il 4 Ira VI 16- 8. g&;!% q .1 WPM a 01 NI ,:lit it ri GG r i '? it II/ ° zi: r Oi 2 Vii i Ra Ul -- _' lye q f 44' ` lift*41/4 2 I !I: :ti* –6 i I— m, G 4F 35E1 aKi< a 3 () 0 k'--- il Pq Atth '.-.2 ir-lt•—::1 111)4 0 g ilij L i :FliP, n a 4 ; 61 ilL c, + 33 • /in \ WA :,,V.1,=''art t4 #g $ / H SN1 xi H l a i JØI g w -. `IF 7 gi...EiglirL m mall __, ° J‘:.allIER;* 3-' 5 1 fir 71: il : °114T141.414:3 -:;411: i g::;;2-.: :A 2(112 ! 1[114 Ir. Tliilli- it a i v2et a 'IC ---1 I I 1! rjr 1 1 1--' 1 ! 11195 t i 2• / # g311;Rill . i iafw 4 p Z J n I 1 "1,1 EMPIRE BATTER1�" °"" A//�\ CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS ar n _ d Multi-Tenant Buildings �`as.■=.' ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. nNANINGAREFORCONCEPTUALUSL ONLYAND a ES, set y- ARE SUBJECT 70(TIANGE BY BUILDING MANUF. .p j !$ Tigard, Oregon . 13G0 S.W.Ilunilkur Sullu 11101, Iluard,OH 91223 N : ' an �� 4 I1° w7' Mom) 503 WO 311U Fax 503 WA 6639 Ry. , — � �� ie co.,. W I I TA L A 15350 S W. Sequoia Pkwy, Suite 300 Property Management Company Portland, Oregon 97224 Property Manager for PACTRuSr 503/624-7787•Facsimile: 503/624-7755 RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 1 6 2000 March 15, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD Julia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Empire Batteries, Inc. Site Development Review 2000 00002 Dear Julia: In response to the notification that I received on the proposed Site Development Review referenced above, I am concerned about additional development of this site. I have NOT seen the proposed plan. but am well aware of the site. My biggest concern relates to truck access and the need to block S.W. Bonita Road in order to access the existing building that is on this site as well as the adjacent buildings to the east. Over the last two weeks I have been stopped twice in the middle of the morning (about 9:30 am) in order to have a large truck back in from Bonita road to service a business that is next door to the east of the subject site. In order to accomplish this, traffic stacked across both sets of railroad tracks to the west, and to Bonita Road to the east. This also blocked all of the driveways to the 5 adjacent businesses for a period of time. The nature of buildings that are built on I-L property should always be to allow for safe and legal truck access without interrupting normal traffic flows. This includes the accommodation of large tractor-trailer combination trucks. I would like to request that you make certain that the applicant has allowed for this access on the property, while still having adequate striped parking and landscaping to satisfy the Tigard Development Code. Thank you in advance for your consideration to my concerns. Warm Regards, C John C. Wiitala 0 Y I A I& I I I) I N G E X c I I E N C E R N E ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. TRAG April 25, 2000 Julia Hajduk �1'�W ap13n,��)S-°11 add Associate Planner 0002 9 City of Tigard 3a 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ea0 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Julia; The new landscaping for the proposed new Parcel 1 is 3,137 sq. ft. This is 8.25%of the proposed parcel. Currently, there is less than 100 square feet of actual landscaping near the existing building. The new proposed landscaping will be constructed in existing vacant areas that are currently used for storage or covered with blackberries and other vegetation. When Bonita Road was widened by the city/county during the 1990s,the existing landscaping areas along SW Bonita were removed to allow for the retaining wall, sidewalk and street curbs. As a result, the site was left with a non-conforming front setback and without landscaping along SW Bonita Road. The non-conforming conditions did not result due to the willful actions of the owner(s). The new landscaping for the proposed parcel 2 is 12,896 sq. ft. This is 24.5%of the proposed parcel. Much of the landscaping is within the stream side buffer and will never be developed as a result of the current buffer regulations. Please call me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, ohn Boutinen Project Manager Phone: 503,968,3118 • Fax: 503.968.6639 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 • Tigard, OR 97223-2305 • Web Site: www.esigc.com • CC8#103613 • DATE: L/ 1PLANSCHECKNQ.: PROJEC TITLE: r eTi n'I Gt�Q a k f COUNTYWIDE IA TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 INDUSTRIAL $193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO OCCUPANCY USE RATE (, . Y'7. RATE BASIS: f� ° • pp I Ca-4 19(3f)o es !7/ 10 sb '+ b . ► r,,� ) �• CALCULATIONS: T�, Lp 5!J r°` . • r r, S 1 F bQ ft,01%ndh�1n (JO.en x ICI • ! X icr5:00 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 33.GI/ NA Iq3 A5118(p,73 FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES 6• ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: �1 f S-r m0.fit, Q n l�'�^.t t-o-Q ►51t ' n t1�STriaY ROAD AMT.: rt TRANSIT AMT.: I . , I '/ � . I / / PREPARED BY: 617/99 t:\shared‘ping\wpshare\scottkkif\procedures manuat\worksheet 99-0O.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIE NOTEBOOK Kristie Peerman -TIF estimate Page 1 From: Julia Hajduk To: Kristie Peerman Date: 4/25/00 3:29PM Subject: TIF estimate OK - here is another one for you! 19,166 square foot building in I-L zone. They are not 100% certain of uses that will go in there so I have been reviewing it based on a Light Industrial use. Obviously, this will be an ESTIMATE only. Thanks for your help. I will continue to send these to you since you indicated you would like the practice, but feel free to pass them on if the circumstances change. :-) Julia Hajduk Associate Planner (503)639-4171 x 407 julia @ci.tigard.or.us www.ci.tigard.or.us April 27, 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING To: Julia Powell Hajduk, Planner APR 2 7 2000 City of Tigard CID' OF TIGARD Subject: Empire Battery Project From: John Skourtes,National Safety Co. Inc. Ph: 706-3595 Follow up to our phone conversation today I hope that the documents I am furnishing you are helpful. Applicant is attempting to maximize his building built out on a triangular lot with no road frontage. We do not understand how large trucks and fire engines will enter or leave these proposed structures. The proper angles for a drive thru around the buildings do not exist. Any turnaround should be designed within the triangular area. The proposed building #2 should be eliminated or moved and reconfigured. Our major concern is to maintain the integrity of our driveway which serves large Diesel over the road trucks. There is no room for landscaping along our road shoulder. This concern was addressed to the Empire Group letter 14 Oct 99, letter attached. Apparently they chose to ignore a real problem. With your expertise as a planner I am sure you will address these concerns in your report. Mobility of traffic and maneuvering room for large trucks and fire equipment is mandatory in an industrial zone. Sincerely, John Skourtes !l1 Alb National Safety Co. Inc. 17010 S W Weir Rd Beaverton, Or. 97007 14 October 99 Mr. John Boutinen C/0 Engineered Structures Inc. 7360 S W Hunziker Rd. Suite 101 Tigard, Or. 97223 Subject: Proposed Empire Battery Project Dear Mr. Boutinen: The site plan as submitted was reviewed. One area of concern which should be changed is the proposed landscape strip parallel to our driveway. This driveway has been heavily reinforced to withstand the weight of fully loaded 80,000 pound sheetrock trucks. A three foot landscape strip will undermine the existing road bed because of the difference in elevations. Your project should be designed to show our driveway with a three foot buffer of river rock then your sidewalk. If the planners do not accept the above we will actively assist you in getting this design thru the system. Any other solution will not work. Back in 1990 Empire Battery and ourshelves agreed to maintain the status quo. The dispute was about adverse possession. Today the only critical area is the reinforced driveway parallel to our building enumerated above. The river rock buffer should avoid any damage to the roadbed. Sincerely, National Safety Co. Inc. John R. Skourtes S WILLIAM A. MONAHAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 12200 S.W.MAIN STREET TIGARID.OREGON 07293 (503)030-8000 June 23 , 1988 Mr. Robert Thompson Thompson, Adams , DeBast, Ray Hall Street Station 4500 S .W. Hall Blvd. Beaverton, Oregon 97005 RE: William N. Flett Estate - National Safety Company Dear Mr . Thompson: Thank you for taking the time yesterday to discuss the easement issue which lily client , John Skourtes of National Safety Combmny, has raised. You suggested that I send to you the particulars of Mr. Skourtes ' request so that you may present the request to First Interstate Bank and the contract purchaser, Victor Shoepe of Empire batteries Inc. National Safety Company has purchased by contract property on Bonita Road in Tigard identified as Oregon Tax Map 2S1 12AC Tax Lot 200 . It was purchased from the Flett Testamentary Trust with final contract payment made in late 1986 . I am not aware if the Special Warranty Deed prepared for the First Interstate Bank ' s Trust Loan Servicing Center in 1986 was ever recorded. The deed granted to National Safety Company contains the reservation of a non-exclusive right of way easement within ten feet of the western boundary of the National property for the benefit of the remaining Flett property, described as Oregon Tax map 2S1 12AC Tax Lot 300 . National has used a similar easement of ten to twelve feet over Tax Lot 300 since the purchase was initiated in 1976. In fact, the side by side easements together make up an access way that benefits both properties. National has maintained the easements and placed gravel over them from time to time to make the easements useable. National is requesting that the easement that it has used and maintained for over eleven years be recorded so that both easements are valid . National is then willing to take steps to improve the easements for the mutual benefit of the tenants of the two properties . The easement that is requested from Tax Lot 300 is described as follows: " a non-exclusive right of way easement within ten feet of the eastern boundary of Tax Lot 300 with such easement being appurtenant to that property which bounds the easement on the East; said easement is to be used as a private driveway and may be improved by the easement holder to facilitate ingress and egress. " 1 � a I have enclosed a sketch which illustrates the properties and the easements in question. I have also enclosed correspondence dated December 9 , 1986 from First Interstate Bank which contains the Special Warranty Deed mentioned above. As I mentioned during our telephone conversation, National feels that it has met the criteria for establishment of a prescriptive easement. We prefer t work with you and the Trust to gain recognition of the easemen- at the earliest possible date. Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, William A. Monahan 2 MAY 03 '00 05:51PM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 96B-311E P. 1 0 A ,j. ,: I I I) I N I, x 1' I I r. rJ c: /ry ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. May 3, 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING Ms. Julia Hajduk MAY 0 4 2000 Associate Planner City of Tigard CITY OF TIGAR� 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Empire Battery Project SDR 2000-00002 Consideration of the standards of 18.797.080 A. Ball Creek is the natural drainage way for site and the adjacent areas. The site topography and the topography of the drainage basin require the storm water run-off to be directed to the south of site and into Ball Creek. The Ball Creek culvert under the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks is the only gravity fed drainage option available to the project site. A stormwater quality facility is required to meet the USA standards. A channel or pipe is required in order to direct the stormwater runoff from the required stormwater quality facility to Bail Creek. An open channel was considered, but not selected due to potential erosion problems. The underground pipe was selected because it minimizes the potential for long-term erosion and It will have only minimal visual impact after the backfill is complete and native grasses have been re-established. The outfail from the pipe will require approximately one yard of Class 50 riprap (50# boulders) to help avoid any potential erosion at the outfall. The impact will be minimal after the native grasses are re-established in this area. B. 1. The stormwater quality facility and the related outfall were designed by Kim McMillan P.E. of Lewis Van Vleet Consulting Engineers. Kim McMillan has many years of experience in dealing with the hydrological Impacts of development. This portion of the site work is designed to specifically minimize erosion and impacts during construction. The construction work is anticipated to take one working day. The area of the trench will be covered with straw after the backfllling is complete. 2. The only work In the riparian zone Is the 8' outfail, which will terminate at elevation 135'. The 100 year flood plain is located at elevation 134'. In order to avoid the potential erosion, the outfall energy dissipation area, must be located near the creek side within the riparian zone. Phone, 503,3913,311B • Fax'. 603.886.6938 7390 9W Nuniiker Road, (Suite 101 • Tigard. On 97EE3-2305 • Web Site: vrww.aaipc.com • CCR0103s13 MAY 03 '00 05:51PM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 P.2 w C. The proposed construction techniques and erosion control techniques will minimize the impact of the construction in the riparian zone. The trackhoe will be able to remain more than 10' from the edge of the stream and extend the bucket to complete the work. The use of straw bales, loose straw ground cover and slit fences will minimize the potential for any silt runoff. D. The work within the riparian zone will not involve any net change in the on-site flood storage capacity. E. The work area within the riparian zone does not involve any slopes that exceed 25%. F. All silt fences and hay bales will be removed when the native grasses have been re-established. The loose straw will decompose naturally. 1. The work area will be delineated to minimize the area of impact. 2. Trees will not be used as anchors and the project will not involve falling any trees. Non-native blackberry bushes will be cut or removed to allow the work. 3. This project does not include selective cutting. 4. Soli will not be stockpiled In this area after the ditch is backfilled. G. 1. The native grasses will be re-seeded. 2. This project does not Include a reduction in the riparian setback. 3. The native grasses will be seeded and monitored for two years. Any areas, which are not re-vegetated during that period, will be re-planted. H. The portion work within the riparian zone does not Include any water or sanitary sewer facilities. I, is project does not Include any on-site water wells or septic systems. J. The erosion control plan for the project complies with the requirements of 18.797.080 J.1-9. K. The erosion control measures will be installed prior to the start of the work. 1. The erosion control measures will be Implemented and maintained throughout the project. 2. All sediment will be contained to the work area or promptly removed from other areas. 3. Sediments will not be flushed Into the surface water management systems , wetlands or stream. 4. A city erosion control inspection will be scheduled prior to construction, L. The proposed project Is not a Type III conditional use. Please Include this information with the SDR application package. Sin eere / ohn Boutinen ..% ' Project Manager May 7, 2000 To: Julia Powell Hajduk & Richard H. Bewersdorff Reference SDR2000-00002 and MLP2000-00002 City of Tigard Planning Department, Subject: Access and Regress Per the City's Findings the above condition has not been satisfied. However in the same report the project is being blessed. This is a dead end flag lot which wants to develop 20,000 sq. ft of buildings. How do you prevent trucks from backing into the site off Bonita Rd after the buildings are complete? Remember these are WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS trucks are automatically part of the mix. Nothing in the City of Tigard Report or the renderings from Engineered Structures Inc. answers the above most basic question. How do you plan to maneuver trucks in and out from this crowded triangular site serving 20,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space, with no delineated space for turnaround and only one way access to the site. All the other points covered in the report are anticlimactic if the most basic question is not properly addressed and solved access and regress. The project as designed if serious modifications are not forthcoming will end up being a traffic nightmare after the occupancy permit is issued.. Perhaps Building #2 should be eliminated to allow more room for turnarounds. S. er ly, J National 1fety Co. Inc. John Skourtes, President Copy: Engineered Structures Inc. CL•1e5? >>� MAY 08 '00 08:33AM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 P. 1 Y `'"ES�1111'�- IEngineered : SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: Toh,) 304rne/1 Company: 6'S� Phone: Fax: 94g-6639 From: jo(,q /491 Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: 5- Zoe' Pages including this page: .2_ COMMENTS: Cofv y 7-2-F_ ( 6IkcA Z . /% /S 4A erzt-MA-re c 7a o r ,c_1 4 i4ss o. . 7ic c ,h ] 7 F / � f c D ST s �r nqo re i/1 o� �o�✓f�c T2 r �„/ z C ii / i4al • City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** —r-- DATE: / PLANS CHECK NO.: PROJEC TITLE: • COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE APPLICANT: WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL $201.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 OFFICE $184.00 X INDUSTRIAL $193.00 INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF j WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP I WEEKEND AVG.TRIP DEFER TO OCCUPANCY /(. USE(s' •; -` .;I RATE , . � 7 +t RATE • BASIS: _ n app 1101_4_ Pry po� 1 1 � i/ , s 4 bu, !a. : CALCULATIONS: R�Q T( x ( s,s + 1 a I AetuM►Aa'�J�. (a.' 7 x I 9 . 1 x Ifo3,o° PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: FEE: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: n 7 ROAD AMT.: - l )J/ • TRANSIT AM 8T7.:.r 0 I 0 thi (I ( .(: )/ 0 (k) t�j PREP ED 6/7/99 1:\sharedping lvpshare.scottk\tiflprocadures manual\MOrksheet 990O.doc CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK MAY 11 '00 10:22AM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 P.1 , Engineered E Structures, Inc. •• 7360 SW Hunzlker Road, Suite 101 C•01.-. •"`• Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 503.9663118 Fax 503-988.8639 Fa)( To: Julia Hajduk From: John Boutinen Co: City of Tigard Planning Pages: 3 Fax: 684-7297 Date: May 11, 2000 Re: SDR2000-00002 CC: ESI file • Comments: Julia, I received the a copy of the attached letter (from Mr. John Scourtes)yesterday. I have reviewed his comments and found his claims to be inaccurate. You will find our reply to his letter attached. Please let me know if his letter will require any action. We are proceeding with our final plans for the project and intend to apply for the building permit very soon. Thanks, john �►ou�1 e4t MAY 11 '00 10:22AM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 958-311B • P.2 • ii I 1 1. N ': I . v aia 16 ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. P-ie„e. May 10,2000 Julia Hajduk Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: SDR2000-00002 and MLP2000-00002 Dear Ms. Hajduk: Today,we received a copy of a letter from Mr. John Scourtes dated May 7, 2000, which was addressed to you. I would like to point out that some of Mr. Scourtes statements are incorrect. I. The site plan for the proposed project clearly shows a 2-way driveway along the east side of the proposed site. The driveway leads to both proposed buildings and the designated loading areas. There is adequate room for typical delivery trucks, including tractor and trailer combinations,to pull completely off from Bonita Road. The trucks can then either turn around in the maneuvering area between Buildings 1 and 2 and exit via the same driveway, or they can continue around the existing building and exit on the one-way driveway located on the north side of the existing building. 2. There is an on-going problem created!by Mr. gcourtes/ tenant,because traoidil rigs park on Bonita Road. Adjoining property owner's and the Tigard police are aware of the problem related to the use of Mr. Scourtes site. We have designed our project to avoid this problem. 3. There is no need to eliminate Building#2 since our proposed plan will accommodate the vehicular circulation and truck loading• 4, Mr. Scoutes has been aware of this project since last October and had more than an adequate amount of time to raise his concerns prior to the SDR application and during the SDR review. Since he did not raise this issue until after the Notice of Decision was issued,we don't believe that it should delay this decision from becoming effective. He has not provided any information to back up his claims and we consider his letter to be without merit or factual basis. In the past,Mr. Scourtes has filed lawsuits and taken other actions to gain use of part of Tax Lot 300. He has not prevailed, and the owners of Tax Lot 300 do not wish to be associated with him or his actions. They do not desire to inherit the problems and possible liabilities related to the activities on his property. Please let me know immediately if the City of Tigard has any legitimate concerns about the issues raised in Mr. Scourtes letter. Any delays caused by this matter will be costly to the owners' of Tax Lot 300. Sincerely, tom / John Boutinen V Project Manager Phone 503,066.3118 • Fax: 603.866.3339 May 15, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD John Skourtes OREGON 17010 SW Weir Road Beaverton, OR 97007 Dear Mr. Skourtes: Staff has received your letter dated May 7, 2000 regarding the Empire Batteries decision (SDR2000-00002 and MLP2000-00002). This letter is to clarify that the decision has been issued and approval was granted with conditions. The conditions must be satisfied prior to building permit issuance. In response to your issue, staff did review the access to the site and finds that the proposed building layout will in fact provide for better movement of large trucks on the site, thus preventing the need to vehicles to back in from Bonita Road. In addition, a condition was also specifically stated that prohibits trucks from backing into the site from Bonita. The applicant's plans provide adequate room for truck maneuvering on-site. If vehicles stop in Bonita and back into the site, they are not only in violation of the conditions of approval, they are also in violation of traffic regulations. Sincerely, Julia Powell Haj uk Associate Planner is\curpin\julia\skourtes may 12 letter c: Ron Goodpaster, Chief of Police John Boutinen, Engineered Structures 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, OR 97223 sbi_ o - OWO 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 APPEAL FILING FORM Z41.VP' FOR LAND USE DECISIONS TYPE II CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX.. (503) 684-7297 The City of Tigard supports the citizen's right to participate in local government. Tigard's Land Use Code, therefore, sets out specific requirements for filing appeals on certain land use decisions. The following form has been developed to assist you in filing an appeal of a land use decision in proper form. To determine what filing fees will be required or to answer any questions you have regarding the appeal process, please contact the Planning Division or the City Recorder at the phone/fax listed at the top of this form. GENERAL INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Property Address/Location(s) and Name(s) of the Application Being Case No.(s): Appealed: 7320 (,J g..A.) t R Case Name(s): FAT( ' e r t icy I N G _ Receipt No.: 0c0 R''V How Do You Qualify As A Party?: A4fYY ( i cse,w Application Accepted By: a-- Date: -1 "`°U 11 .. � // nn Approved As To Form By: Appellant's Address: 7 - ,.SKJ gu uz( r 2:( 9'722_3 Date: City/State: ,r-c � ©r' Zip: Denied As To Form By: Day Phone Where You Can Be Reached:(S03) qfG - 31 I g Date: Scheduled Date Decision Is To Be Final: 5/19,10a Rev.10/3/96 i:kurpinlmasterslappeal.doc Date Notice of Final Decision Was Given: 511. 6O Specific Grounds For Appeal or Review: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ..c6:7).-e..- CiTttf-_, P_LP, r ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Ike_ n-pp(< <�✓✓� G p e-cr S 0 Appeal Filing Form (completed) C o l f l O N 24 r PEA. ( 0-(N i 7 1J Filing Fee(based on criteria below) > Director's Decision to Hearings Officer $ 250.00 C4 i �cC s l,y > Expedited Review(deposit) , > Hearing Referee $ 500.00 /T)O��y-� > Planning Commission/Hearing's Officer to City Council $1,745.00 (�— L/ v`J• (+Transcript) Signatu (s) of A lant( : APPEAL FILING FORM FOR LAND USE DECISIONS 1.\curpin1masters\appeal (OVER FOR ADDITIONAL WRITING SPACE) PAGE 1 OF 1 i v i s 1 B U I L D I N G E X ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. o �o tiTRAG May 18, 2000 Planning Director City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Appeal,by the applicant of SDR2000-00002 &MLP2000-00002,decision dated May 4, 2000. The appeal pertains to the Conditions of Approval item 24. To Whom this Concerns: The owners of the property located at 7320 SW Bonita Road(WCTM 2S 112AC,Tax Lot 00300), wish to appeal Condition 24. The applicant appeals the condition requiring the owners of Tax Lot 00300 to enter into an easement agreement with the owner of Tax Lot 00200,in order to form one shared driveway. The appellant is the applicant and thus has standing to file this appeal. The appeal is based upon the following issues. 1. A Pre-Application Conference was held on 6/15/99 with Mark Roberts of the City of Tigard Planning Division and Brian Rager of the City of Tigard Engineering Staff. The city indicated at that time that the applicant should"try to consolidate the two driveways"which existed on Tax Lot 00300. (See page 4of the"Pre-Application Conference Note,Engineering Section") The city staff did not state that they would require a joint driveway easement with Tax Lot 00200. The applicant prepared plans,which included abandoning one of their driveways and providing a legal driveway at the existing easterly approach. This addressed the concern raised by the staff in the notes. It is unreasonable to require a joint access driveway when the site has an existing access driveway and the proposed plan complies with the city standards for Access Drives. (See Section VI. Applicable Review Criteria and findings,page 11.) 2. The planned abandonment of one existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 00300 improves the traffic safety concerns along this part of SW Bonita Road. The applicant complied with the concerns raised during the Pre-Application Conference and the proposed development is an improvement over the existing conditions along that section of SW Bonita. The applicant's plans allow for the required vehicular and pedestrian access without a shared driveway or easement with Tax Lot 00200. It is unreasonable to require the applicant to resolve traffic problems created by the use of properties owned by others. Phone: 503.968.3118 • Fax: 503.968.6639 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 • Tigard, OR 97223-2305 • Web Site: www.esigc.com • CCB#103613 Appeal of SDR2000-00002 and MLP2000-00002 May 18, 2000 Page 2 of 2 3. The applicants are concerned about the existing traffic problems created by the business located on Tax Lot 00200. (At certain times, due to the nature of the existing operation on the adjoining site (TL 00200), there are delivery trucks parked in the center lane of SW Bonita.) If a shared driveway access is required, the same delivery trucks could relocate the same problem in the access driveway to the applicant's site. If the applicant removes one of their two existing driveways as directed by the city staff and must also share their only driveway with the adjoining site, their access could be effectively blocked by the neighbor's traffic. It is not reasonable to require the applicant to resolve the traffic problems created by the use on another property that they do not own or control. 4. The access options to the applicant's site were reduced when SW Bonita Road was widened by the City of Tigard. As part of the street widening project,the applicant's site frontage area was reduced and the remaining area was greatly impacted by the street retaining walls. The owner of Tax Lot 00300 was assured that they would have continued access to SW Bonita Road for their existing and future uses,when they agreed to dedicate the land required to widen SW Bonita. 5. Due to the past conduct and adversarial actions of the adjoining property owner, the applicant and owner's of Tax Lot 00300, will not be able to reach a workable easement agreement for a joint access easement. The owner of Tax Lot 00200 has previously attempted to gain additional property along the east side of Tax Lot 00300 from the owner's of Tax Lot 00300 through adversarial actions. The only easement that he has obtained is 614 square feet of property on Tax Lot 00300, which adjoins his outdoor storage area. This area is more than 164' south of Bonita Road and is accessible from the current driveway on Tax Lot 00200. It is unreasonable to require the applicant to become a partner with an adverse adjoining property owner, in order to resolve traffic issues which were partially created by the city and the adjoining property owner. We request that Condition 24 and any requirement for a joint access/egress agreement be removed from the Conditions of Approval. Sincerel , John Boutinen (Applicant) Engineered Structures, Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Z-.\Jobs\1998\980505_1 B\Appeal.doc Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:05/18/2000 15:47 User:FRONT Station: 02 Operator: GEO Rcpt No: 0002294 Date: 05/18/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 250.00 Name: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES INC Cash: 0.00 Address: 7360 SW HUNZIKER ST Check: 250.00 TIGARD, OR 97223 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 250.00 re 73 zo 5'e 1.3 /F-79 7 e< ,I O 8000-006o /j�L�'R000 -000d AY 19 '00 04:08P NGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 P.1 14,41.40--111t1b1:1 ESI Engineered •. ': - ,V Structures, Inc. 7380 SW Hunzikor Road, Suite 101 I 00111 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 503.968.3118 Fax 503-968-6639 Fax To: Julia Hajduk From: John Boutinen Cot City of Tigard Pages: 1 Fax: 684-7297 Date: May 19, 2000 Re: Empire Battery Project CC: ESI file • Comments: Dear Ms. Hajduk, We agree that it Is preferable to meet with the City of Tigard staff next week and work out an agreement regarding the driveway access. In light of our conversation earlier today and the desire of both the City of Tigard and the applicant, we agree to allow an extension of the 120 day period to July 14, 2000. Please call me on Monday, 5/22/2000 to schedule a meeting to discuss this Issue. Thanks, �oh� OvLAtiluot MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: May 23, 2000 TO: FILE: SDR 2000-00002, Empire Batteries FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2000-00002, Empire Batteries: Condition #24 (Access Easement) This memo is to clarify the intent of Condition #24, which states: "Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall confirm whether or not there is an ingress/egress easement available from Tax Lot 200, Map 2S1 12AC to the east of this site. Assuming there is an easement, the applicant shall revise their site plan to utilize the existing driveway entrance on Tax Lot 200. If an easement does not exist, the applicant shall contact the property owner of Tax Lot 200 and work with them to have an official easement executed. If the applicant desired to have a wider driveway than what exists, they could work with the property owner of Tax Lot 200 to provide a joint driveway across the common property line. In that case, the applicant would also need to grant an ingress/egress easement to Tax Lot 200." This condition was in response to a letter Staff received from the owner of Tax Lot 200, after the formal comment period, wherein he claimed that there was an existing ingress/egress easement over Tax Lot 200 in favor of the applicant, to where the applicant could take access over Tax Lot 200 and use an existing driveway on that site. This condition was written to require the applicant to verify whether or not this is true. If it were true, the applicant is required to adjust their site plan to show that they will take access through Tax Lot 200 and close all driveways on the subject parcel. This condition does not require the applicant to obtain an easement from the adjoining property owner, only that they "contact the property owner of tax lot 200 and work with them". If the owner of tax lot 200 is unwilling to grant an easement under terms acceptable to the applicant, the applicant has still met the intent behind this condition. This condition also does not require the applicant to grant any easement rights to the owner of Tax Lot 200, unless the applicant desires a wider driveway than what can be provided by using the existing driveway on Tax Lot 200. In that case, the applicant could propose a joint driveway straddling the common lot line between the two properties and then grant the owner of Tax Lot 200 an ingress/egress easement to allow full use of the joint driveway. is\e ng\b ri an r\c omme n t s\sd r\s d r2000-00003-memo-acc a ss.d oc iJr2J-)11- 4_ ti ctfr ZLlj a ) MAY 30 '00 05:34PM ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 P.1 {TRU°o ESI Engineered . s;'. '. ' Structures, Inc. '�� i 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 4 e o M' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 503.968-3118 Fax 503-968-6639 Fa)( 594�� CO/7o4 . To: Julia Hajduk From: John Boutinen Co: City of Tigard Planning Pages: 3 Fax: 684-7297 Date: May 30, 2000 Re: SDR2000-00002 CC: ESi file • Comments: Julia, We have not found any existing valid joint ingress/egress for Tax Lots 200 and 300 (Map 2S1 12AC). We have attempted (via certified mail)to contact the owner of Tax Lot 200 regarding an easement for ingress/egress. I requested that the owner reply by 4:00 PM today. .As of 5:00 PM today, we have not had any reply to our request for the joint driveway easement from the owner, Mr. John Scourtes. We must proceed with the completion of the final plans and we do not feel that we can wait any longer for Mr. Scourtes reply. At this time we plan to abandon any further attempts to negotiate an easement and our site plan will incorporate a driveway along the east side of the proposed site. If this satisfies Condition of Approval 24 of the Type li Decision for SDR 2000-00002 end MLP 2000- 00002, we are willing to drop our appeal. (As previously discussed, the City of Tigard will refund approximately 85% of the Appeal fee.) Thanks, evatAtiFix.h. MAY 31 'Otn G12:O1BPI'1 ENGINEERED STRUCTURES 968-3118 • • • . P. 1 , , _ c► 1' !' .� It S"" ;% 11 I1 1 1 1) 1 N [: F X F 1 1 F N i' I Ic '. •+. ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. n q ti 'ran<: RECEIVED PLANNING May 31, 2000 JUN 01 2000 Ms. Julia Hajduk City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 This letter is to formally withdraw our appeal of the decision on SDR2000-00002 for the Empire Batteries project. The withdrawal is based upon the staff decision, that Condition of Approval number 24, has been met by the applicant. Sincerely, '.,. .):-..A., .12--- 15 ohn Boutinen (Appellant) Phone: 603.®66.3118 • Fe:: 503.968.663® 7360 9W Hunzlker Road, suite 101 • Tlgerd, OR 87223-2305 • Web Rita: www.ealgo.00m • CC 103413 Con d,1-10,, j RECEIVED PLANNING N E A NOV 292000 0 rAI9nt r ENGINEERED STRUCTURES,INC. CITY OF TIGARD p �� Q o o ti 7.R A04 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite101 Tigard, OR 97223-2305 CCB# 103613 Office Phone: 503-968-3118 Fax: 503-968-6639 Web Site: www.esigc.com Letter of Transmittal Date: November 22,2000 Project Name: Empire business park To: Jim Wolf SDR 2000-00002 City of Tigard police Department We are sending you: x Attached ❑ By Fax# ❑ Under separate cover via: ❑ Construction Drawings x Approval Drawings ❑ Permit Drawings ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Letter ❑ Change order ❑ Other COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Copies of the outdoor lighting plan. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑Approved as submitted x For review and comment ❑ For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑ For Permits ❑As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Prints returns after loan to us Remarks: Please review the outdoor lighting plan and let me know if you approve or require any changes. (This project is now in a site work permit and I didn't realize that you weren't in their loop for reviews.) Thanks for your assistance. ,` S. erely - VU1t01 — o n outln c' \'4 'A OOVIN c CAN- Project Manager 01CCe4ca 015 Stipmt ed . ,,IM V\)o\c ( ■)o\tv.- i■"L-100 E70Si.25'-o' EXIST. 25'-0' WIDE DRIVE WIDE DRIVE 30'-D. 30'-0. N 1 — - - - - - - -G-BaH R A R-0AD I - - - — — - - - 50'-O'To OUST. I 24'WIDE DRIVE q 1 I \ . , , , CD + XI: , / • •@-_1 1 .7 ■ .4 NEW 24'-0' EMI 2W-0' II� II Ii ABANDON EIL ENTRY WIDE DRIVE ,110E DRIVE t;po IONE WAY \ M AND SIDEWALK CURB I V, z C EI _ 1 I , �\Ig/ �, o 0 I'II I k4F _�• a p> g I P2 Ii\ / O 1 1 ///�/�/rr �1—if— \\ . 6 / • e pi 02„,„ il 0 -. / pr,„11 ip . 4 A 1.111111/11 I,:Ill ir 1- /r/ : 4 / / I g r L o \ - i/iiiiiii% - I 14 \ 1 1 _ - - - _I '1 I / _ I \ - '' � � 4i , \ .I i� -- \ r* _ _ � / /K I / \ rn n A / / 1 \ 0 \/< I I �� -- O I / C-p o Z a - -, / ct o /\\ t,z o A g. n lJ \ N 0 f 1 \ I , li 0g 4 % 1 I x o z 0 c 1 ` . iti—— 42'?�a / 4' IQv. / `-.‘,..\______ 71111 i. q ' i/ \ gE P�` tg li '84 i, i ac i II \ // f gOr Pli 0 tR i I R EMPIRE BATTERY PERMIT DRAWING > i d Multi—Tenant Buildings 4.."=� ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. DISTROY ALL PREVIOUS PLANS I i 3 Tigard, Oregon •®. 7360 S.W.Hunziker Suite#101,Tigard,OR 97223 MO. DA/2 REYNOLDS \ Phone 503-968-3118 Fax 503-968-6639 1 4/I0/00 POW NT OUTSIDE LIGHTING PLAN 2 V7/W WKOL/WM ] 3 7/24/D3 IDOL me r • 12 �-I NOTES: n / 1 I /7-I 1 I 1/ �Cjl✓ �w�sc-e./�� Ove G�oc�a 1/4 1Q 24 GA. MR-24 STANDING S SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM .- ' 12 126 GA. SHADOWALL METAL - - WALL PANELS - SHELL GRAY CO rn INI �`V a0 I-3—I 8" THK. SPLIT FACE C.M.U. (GROUT SOLID) 0 Z o — NTURAL Z .cc lilil I n 8" THK. SMOOTH C.M.U. WITH 8"x8" ° il I r �' -- — ----- --- ------- FACE (GROUT SOLID) — CHARCOAL I , I Q •••• A mim �..._ -. --_ __ (3l NOT USED ���5��__ o' <Y w ___ IJ STOREFRONT GLASS SYSTEM ____ ___ ___� Y._____ = �__________ = J Y C TABLE 13—D ..— a mm=(8 J 8" THK. SMOOTH C.M.U. WITH 8"x8" CC i R a FACE (GROUT SOLID) - NATURAL W o 0 s N O R T H E L E V A T I O N S METAL DRIP LEDGE — LAVA • SOU T H ELEVATION a 8 g SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0 NOTE: SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 3 DOORS, WINDOW & DOOR ---1----' FRAMES - WHITE • " 71 CV lei did W/1.4111111 11 OP5I Ill -liii' 11111 III 01 co Cn I ■••••••,...m.....,111111 •I tom= ill 11111 • I am ___________________ 41: ' , ------ Arm EAST ELEVATION u) u,°._ 19 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0• 0 0 cco o W I i I :Lc N Cir 3 Cn W � 2 Z �L Io o IF. Z 1 W W u7 •__________________ _r_._._._.__•__r•r•_•_•_-_•r•r-_•_-_-w-r•r•_-_-w._•r•_•_•_•w-w-r•r•_•_•_•_-_•_•r•r._._._•_•—•_•_•_•r•r•_•w•_•wr _____________________________w____--______________________________________w_w_w_w_�r•�i_w_w____w_w_.��w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w- ____ ________________________________________________________w_w_w_w_w_w.,�___w_w_w____w_—_-� —__w_w__—_ _w_—___—_w_—__w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w •______w___________w__ w____w_ _ _________ _w_ _ _ __ ____w_w_w_w_w�ww_ _____w_w___c=a�_w_w-.___w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w____w_w_w____w_w_�—_w_w_w__—_w• •______________________w_________ _ —_ _ _ _ _ ___w_w_w_ —__w___— _= _w_.�rw_w_____ w_w_ ____w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w _____________________________ ___________________________w_•_ ___w_w_w_w_w_ rw_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_ww_w_w_w_ww_w_w• CL __________ ___ ______ ______ ____ _______________________________ _w_w_w_w_—__w_w____w_w_w_w_w_w____w_w____w_w_w_w_w_w_____—_w_w_wwANC.•y0 w _____ _____________w____ww______________.____wwww_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w____w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w____w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_www• 1J ___________________________ _ __ ____________ ____� _ w_ _ w_ —_-=____w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_�_w_w_w=∎_■_w_■_w_■_w_w_w_—__"' 4 4. , ___________________________________w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w_w____w_ww_w_w_w w_w_w w_w_w�—w___ wp i is I� L. V WEST ELEVATION '' THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF °��/ 1��- ,r ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. AND ARE `a / SCALE: 1/8"=1'-O NOT TO BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY aM1�•3•ae"1 MANNER, EXCEPT WITH THE PRIOR WRITTEN "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN BELOW DETECTABLE WARNING ON 12"X18" SIGN W/ INTERNATIONAL PERMISSION OF ENGINEERED STRUCTURES Inc. INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL SIGN RAMP SURFACE PER UBC SYMBOL OF ACCESS 4'-0" TO (VAN STALLS ONLY) TEXTURED (STAMPED) 6'-O" ABOVE SIDEWALK ON BLDG. CONC. SURFACE OR 7'-0" CLEAR ABOVE GRADE ON POST PARKING WITH D.M.V. DISABLED PERMIT ONLY VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO CONC. SIDEWALK TOWING UNDER ORS 811..620 AND FINE • FIRM, STABLE (PAVED) •• •"'•'•'•''�''' UP TO $250 UNDER C ' SURFACE. SLOPING NOT •-•.��.J I MORE THAN 1:48 IN ANY •• I 7 WHEEL STOP PER PLAN ORS 811.615 DIRECTION m J ACCESS AISLE W/ STRIPES I . O m o PAINTED ON SURFACE TO 16" TO 18" 1— C V) I DISCURAGE PKG. VIOLATIONS RADIUS < 0 L. Z ill°1 ° m C co L. INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL N .2 1/2" GALV. STL. PIPE RADIUS y 5—0 y LLI 7 SLOPE 1/4":FT EDGE OF BLDG W OF ACCESS PAINTED ../..--4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING TYP. OR LANDSCAPING j 3 ON SURFACE IMBED 6" MIN. rCONC. SIDEWALK -, - - - - .. I A J/ W ~ 0 Li .. a u-11-11=11=11- AS REQUIRED 0 -J 1-11 1111. .11:=11-11— 4. .' =11=11=1= W 1- W 9'-0" 8'-0" 9'-0" L 4" CONC. S.O.G. `"-- A.C. PAVING .n AS NOTED 980505 L La ® ADA PARKING DETAIL BIKE RACK DETAIL SIDEWALK DETAIL AJFI/°5 0044 04020 J 0 PQl p SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0° • 1 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0 ^-3 • y Iq'-4' / 1'-4" t 4'-O" I f / 18'-O" t I! • 11111111!11;111; 11!11;1:� -_�_ • _ _ ._, - 111111111;!11!11 % iiiiiI'1111111;1;;1;11; f 111;111111111111 „ .- 11;;11;;;1111 ; r \ - - u - _ _ _ 1 / 11 / 111 - 7 _ 1111. -_-_,----- 1111111111111111 10 - f f _ 1111111111111111 : IuI.1i 0 `_:' 111111 11111111 mum - - - - 111;1111111;1111 iiiiiiI _ � _ 1111111_-- -- -- 11111111111111II " — ::z:I : I�^ _ _ 111111 I. ___ __ _ -y 111M e 1111111111111111 rn - - riilir - - - � 1 r --_ 111/:1%' - - llll1111 __ III -- 11111: rn 11111 ! 1 ! = ------ 1%I : 1 a: rn _� - :!i!�i° - - - - 11111111111111111 -= " �' - - - / 111 / 111 ED a _ rn _^�-_-_-_ 11111111111111:1 rn 0 1 - - - - 1111111111111111 r . - r ru - - - - 1111;1;11111;111 rn � � * , � 1 - _ - 11l111l1 11111111 { - 111ili AYI• { 0 r i;; y - 1111111111111111 � 1J �f:- �. - — — — — I.I.,.I.I...I.I1 — ------ u r _ — 11' �_- -_-_- 11111 / 1 ��_-_ ^I: - II!IHIIIJI■: ' - iIiIIIiIi1iIiIiI Z - - __-/. 1 . # Z '- : 2 _ b� Y rn W - - ::- ;111111111111111 O / T-4' / 4'-0" b�'" / r -�-- �_�- WAWA!!1 _ / ter-a" u -_-_=_`-- 11:1:1;1;111;1;1 n , --- ------ IuIliIsI.I.IuIu- _ - 1 A # [I pie A it _^_� H - 111111111;11111; r--•-7 T- ! 1 ! 1 1 1 , : _-:_�:it 111111-141114 l 1; L / la'-a" -r II jiIlll111/111 L t _-_-- --- iuiuuIIIi1:1i1:1 --j _-_-_-_-_ 1IISII1I1III1I !u!ih!i!ui _ - - - -_ - - - - iai ----=- •I• -_------- ili/il.li ri•il 1,;,1.;.1.; °� _ _ .. _ 111111!11;111! iliIiIiIII- 1111111111111111 �. 0 0 1 . - 1111111 E' ' ' - iIiIiiiiIIiIdiI - - C 111:111111:---___y� ;1111111111 - 111 ii!iiii:iij:11111 1 D �� PT' Elf' ___ ® � A® ® Q rn 1111111111: 111 ! 1 . -- - o - , X° � > 4, � 1;11111111;: ---- --m-_ = ow j l ' -r •PigiVIN 7. !19111111: - "-' p 111 /111111, _-�-_-_-_ i _ .�� , o IuilluliM_ - - - z 11111 � i PDi1 1 111 zm-� < �� �, lululululu! m °Z D o C� 11 Ju A G7 (- O z %m0 1'-4" 4'-0" / Iq'–q' ./ 1 flf;f;f;f'f °�mV12 f .. II'-4" .r z 11111111111 z=p`� H x 1111111111: � Am 111111111! m m It In omAn iss I 1�`n 1 A°C�O g6 V IV A to 0 m " 1'-4" 4v-S" ..._...-.#:. na VIZ x ... 1840" ,_---j- i # alt 1 EMPIRE BATTERY PERMIT DRAWINGS I Multi-Tenant Buildings "" ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. DISTROYALLPREVIOUSPLANS Tigard, Oregon ��, 7360 SW.Hunziker Suite#101,Tigard,OR 97223 "a 0O� "0A ���i t yto/oo lO�IT tQ b �6 �, � • Phone 503-968-3118 Fax 503-968-6639 2 '�� mow.ISSUE ELEVATIONS BLDG. #2 RECEIVE: k yt9. The storm outfall construction has been reviewed by Bill Parks of DSL and Richard Gebhart of the Corps of Engineers. Permits are not required by either agency because the work involves less than 50 cubic yards and it is not within the 100 year floodplain or s' designated wetlands. Letters from both agencies are attached. M' 'fi The architectural site plan (A-1) and Sheets C-1, C-2 and C-3 show the 50' buffer and no G✓t "-J 4 A ,s°"7-`'_ . development other than the storm outfall is to be done in this area. The Corps of aP 'r5 -1r: Engineers and DSL do not require permits for the outfall. ''' """ t"`h'' 1. A Street Opening permit has been applied for the work along SW Bonita Road. 22. The information required by Condition 22 was included with the Street Opening permit e„„,„.5 application. 23. A suite layout plan has been submitted to the Engineering Department and Suite numbers have been assigned. The $'120.00 fee will be paid with the applicable fees when we pick up the Site Permit. ' 24. Condition 24 has already been addressed and the city planning staff and engineering staff have approved the new driveway. 25. The storm drainage plan and calculations have been submitted to the city of Tigard. A copy of the calculations is included. 26. The water layout plan has been reviewed by Mike Miller of the City of Tigard. Two meters will be required for this project and this will require new connections to the City of Tigard water main. The water meter fees have been paid to the City of Tigard 27. An on-site water quality facility will be provided and details are provided on Sheets C-1 through Sheets C-4. The stormwater calculations have been included with the permit drawings. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter. We are ready to pay the TIF fees as soon as we know that we will be able to proceed. The Site Permit review should be nearly complete and we would like to start work as soon as possible. Sincerely, John Boutinen Project Manager • . RECEIVED ,, UC.... DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ^ PORTLAND DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O.BOX 2946 ^i PORTLAND,OREGON 97208-2946 ENGINEERED STRUCTURES REPLY TO \n "` , ATTENTION OF: December 28,2000 Operations Division Regulatory Branch Corps No.: 2000-1072 Mr.John Boutinen Engineered Structures Inc. 7360 SW Hunziker Road, Suite 101 Tigard,Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Boutinen: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received your request(Enclosure) for Department of the Army authorization to complete a development project that will involve constructing an outfall discharging treated water into Ball Creek. This project involves filling a site that will avoid an on-site wetland and constructing an outfall structure above the regulatory line associated with Ball Creek. This project is located in Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Washington County, Oregon. Your application has been reviewed for compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Based on the information you provided,telephone conversations with your agent, and a site visit by Mr. Richard Gebhart, of my staff, your proposed activity is not regulated by the Corps. Therefore no Department of the Army authorization is necessary and no further review from this office is warranted. If you modify your project plans so that your proposal will impact any water of the United States, including wetlands, resubmit your plans for further review. I have assigned this activity to Corps number 2000-1027. Please use this number in future correspondence about this activity. If you have any questions,please write using the letterhead address or call Mr. Gebhart 503-808-4383. You may also email him at: richard.a.gebhart@usace.army.mil. Thank you for contacting this office before starting your project. iiiiSinc ely, id Lawrence C.Evans Chief,Regulatory Branch Enclosures Copies Furnished Oregon Division of State Lands(Parks-NPR) Environmental Protection Agency-Portland(Vellette) City of Tigard Planning Department(Hajduk) 4 a" it IV C ►� � d5� 97TH AV^L i8. _ yp9 "' '� CFf � �` lue6i� 11S "�� ,EN, A . s� - - R, 1 a L° �' s�'p to �� c., ' l• ,6�A • �''•j X41 &' g� 97TH 1-.►... . ro�y�R fN81 ~ ©� >,� , , 95TH - c�' A�� _ A 12 W e 941H 9STNAV C4. 6 441- � - E to g sw a P it Nilo J/ -0 :lit`p �y� Y,~ SM 9 R i!m° i `� I (�D ; °�; `1711 p A'sw 92110 AY V . r°- 9� ES •. ` SSW 92,y Y yw,- il. !` M li 1s"°o 'a ©© r-1 91ST AY m ,1 .�:�, SM 9157 I' ;S Fo ER Ar �\ O. et!./ �j•, •, „ ! ' Si c tA n t .°. sw 1Q y a' t) i AS SW 90TH AV 41 ! 8 • • THl ;�° 2. ;:e am "i re. ; a g a • : <'9t. di° 11600 11200 / `Z 424 Sw :. , AV CT is t+ 6 �w :' J Y�12 12` � N- ..y �S� �� c�� A `� t�lb t m � to m AY / r �' 7G A+ F' Sw EIfM AY x a SW HALL :k BLVD ‘24(ow_ -- 13800 13111 ,<'( '' I ' W _ 6 '� t¢ 15000 SW MI H 6 >Q lr ,,,.. �, �� BLV .. . 1*� �1 fry I WOO' .�r 0 Ieo i ism1 VAr , tee K a . °r" p$� 6Cb ..0 12 11 :111` a6, I 1. SNi... .185THi V • _ [lyr7 m .. AY N • 33 :1 Sl! 83RD i ■ �• ... . g tt J �-4., r� a A iTs N3'• �� T AV I Y jV. sal 9w J .. z- �� > SW 82ND AY Ir' w, ounll�®- =1ST TY AYR - - �` -; �----.. rT^..1.. ■ 8 /� r CT 1E g AV I c wTM f/ t4 r't� �.i'$ m Sly 81ST A I I g`1�� i _ gg T © 79TH�� AV ya t• St '1� 8 SW 79TH � I.-511�. BOTH •1'000 (:�� - '� f SE l7 -� SW 78TH C`, I IQ 4 i! i r.+48 L � SW 76TH AV I SW CHERRY D AV 1}I �� ,® 1300 v, t5M j,. t77TN! r, 42 6TH AY 14500 s` �� SW 76TH AV y .a0 MS g ! 1 ' -i' I 2 la 0,• _ v 'sue A m m s = i� 5W Im ;75TH'P 1. AV I • 74TH et w m °Al 141H ,, (]v m S SW 14TH AV G.?[� 1 ;N '�� ,, .. E SW-1 j/ 72NIii ■ "i iolomPoRre PA" 13700 n U3D0 _) V ^.�. SW• 72 __ AV 4 CO fi r= -�! rs O.k `-�/ '� m 2000 11200 4 a£€ 4 1 '''k•—r� 72ND `. _ AV a I� z I 5� "E' SW 715 �•� •.1 146°0 v 14500 14000 c, 25= �.yo W m'• 5W 707H pl,"�.. 9TH <SW rpA PKiIY rP` -_ _ AV'. H E=an n PKWY " ' CT -��, '�' / - - 1 // 12.000 I' SM 0 a Hl:• F , Y,it 6sw r 1 66TH z AV -, -I pAV �._-� _' f__� p __^:.._ ,r ' .._.....� ,...� :.;, ., � a. :. __. _ _ a ; _ x. _ I1V, ,^i.r s'6iM Ay�u 11G .;:":k og• ,1 vY - r, '� E Ar /..... 'r'� '��' SW RAI�Y��M^L -�� 441191 µ �b S� 'I� SW 63RD l=,AV 19000 •1� SW_le{47 V 64TH\ ,�w SW '� 641H AV l ►Q... 'aa ? '!P - �r_ o -.+."� j`1•- .^��� - '. •,�j y- x 9 . 61R0 AV IP () !� �! P �S� r#- loo � V r---- 5� Im SW 63Rf1)° _ PL-.. 1-A a ND K SW {? e•CCpDD '•� e-� CO 9 _ ' C 5 ..•62ND r-i Ay �i , *Co \1 62ND AV N. --Ar /, �i9 1:::!...,' I G S° N s� SW = 61ST AV t. s ' 8 z 9 \�� ,1""•'► = S 0 P pl , PARKER y ;g 6 •m I ->� P. r..lt r�r''W •- 60TH AV CF N\\ 51! 60TH A., p� ��' O_A �ff� ao z C �'�.a �j ,°" ``7�yy_� - . fR �� �t•�+Ir9�w~ N Q" r•► I--` �I.10 �i° 1 T/i,i'4"...\-..Clii°61* y7 - A _ _ -." y�E. 1 ��1 1� '�`rst4lu �'y.1 : �' (�T ,�; • i:3 ... ..ROGE RS RD ; 1�� A r� f� ��o -SW 58q A oc:. " CP-W--LL15H00 irc - Mx*,,,wN\, `°�. n F e` FN C• N 4,4) l~f. n,..,, ,, d s n '�"� 5w �*?*-N ._ V ` .e;N r p IT %%.4' 51 �� SY 561N1 y_ �J. u ,...-�I 1- - 7A—V �l `ter ao_ ea(" -° FOSS • �i"'°—` - Ri ,�SW I it -, ,,s'`.4 .. 1 ►t Ar _ sW 5T AV mit --------- — - .�$ : A, i^ I Aan" /� I .ti E .L_ I' . Q1 , A :�.A w.+ vw 1 1.1!•.... • . § o wg o, vl NcV E 0§ 3 2 x, TOPOGRAPHIC/SITE SURVEY ,b-w 3 v' FOR: ENGINEERED STRUCTURES, INC. 4 .5 0. - BEING TAX LOT 300, TAX MAP 2S 1 12At. w 6 i 1 - r IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 12; T.2S., R1W., 1P.I U U 0 a-,-- CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON gcl AUGUST 21, 1998 , y r ;REVISED: OCTOBER 19. .1999 y1 _f. REVISED: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 - A ASPHALT X1q,I64C � PANT SET BY oii s II7.QfAC r °X 1/??.R. / / j / � br-r,r>, N� we � Ccuer- 4,r-{ s5 50 IZ. r 5. XrIT X,f%Yp . � N. OTE: fps, o a ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF TIGARD. THE AREA !C. ? i` �� EAST OF 72nd AVENUE IS NOT IN THE 100 YEAR •1 . 'l:'... F.000 PLAIN. THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PI.IJW *IA ON THE WEST SIDE OF 72nd AVLIIUE IS 34.00',r Z xr4a4a�m 14 to FBA PANEL / IS 4102 76 000:10 DATED ►,.c.�00 V f/{({ ;rCrbl 1, 1982 J �ad,.y ,U x145.^. • ' \ _ ,'IJ ' .., , ..„... ,..a wwo s e., x,4 x,4>scn� (( CLAJcQ , e,e .1y31pbfa v w� A-).717,./e, q V S 0,O • r x,wapwa NO ELEVATION ,0, / y,4a 1VSOM. DATA AVAll ear c 0 DEC-13-00 02 :22 PM LEWIS & VAN VLEET INC. 503 8851206 P. 01 12'13.'00 14:03 e503 378 4844 STATE LANDS 21101 '002 DIVISION OF STATE LANDS MEMORANDUM • To h, / '4C)`'li I4/ u 4i ti t c, Date; z, - (7-(330 ` / e r From /31 `r ��,4 Subject; rye Mlle i ��--, . ic1. - 04 ri,k. .J- . 1 , A- << 1- o, sue- C.,�,,i i e_...-4-, A44, pri-toko .44-e-ef i-t- c-2.-6--a . 4 c_ czn .,7 . ,/ r ,,.,.„...,,.,t-d4- ,.....,...„4., _ , z,.:t.,4,&.. (/;.-& Post-It' Fax Note 7171 °"P12.13'00 To 3014 1..3 Co/°dot. E.51 Phone e c Phony 0 5.13 _O 5 fexa PaxM • • L E'W 15 & Lit VAN VLEET Incorporated principals trine c.van vleet.p.e. STORM WATER CALCULATIONS garw J.'ems.p.e. FOR EMPIRE BATTERY Tigard, Oregon FOR Engineered Structures, Inc. • 1 3'2 . r / J v C. ' 30. 10� tv rSARAt ° , EXPIRES12/31/2000 Lewis & Van Vleet, Inc. Job Number 99333 consulting engineers 16660 s.w. boones ferry road tualatin. oregon 97062 [503) 885.8605 phone [503) 685.120 6 fax LFWI5 & consulting engineers :nt ;113650 s.w. booties ferry road �j L tualatin. Oregon 97052 Job No. 9 9 33 By 3 S ) [503)885.8505 phone [503)885.1206 fax VAN VLEET Date /Z• 1—( • `19 Sheet No. I incorporates 5 7 0 1?-4-1\t\) - - Chu tfm o r.)5 "ror7c... 3 'TTc_ °ICS,415 5- (Z.01 Co 0.C' isTt,u4 /n�c3vroKS A = J9, 335 5 (0 444 a.c> _ .. - -- l3u11-�1tiG = /4,3 s-5 s-F , ,:-_ rlekiT_=__ `1,_950 _r h6:0 1 OPWi0 a‘ Ai6ik=_ 54, $L (o5f ( 1.ztov_ wc' . - "- T _ 5 _ Tz o�sED Ir'. � _ q zo 1 s T (1.10 3 a c> - c 1r-bi J S = 33, 55/ s-f __ [ _ r • D uJQ llo�urle_ (0,034(!1&.0 InP, Arm ' F 1, (i 5 0 c; - 4%-!40o xe 'CzerccKcsr = o t; = 0,0 0 ct 5 cis '' Fr '?---A-1-E. (,'4$Nci (6o^" ((opAt • L r \10�v,t' . \-"Vov'DL--t• £Lc-4(C'i Pice-e e, (4 \1ot,u n� (c0 \A \ -1-10 \4D 5to0 (00 5 1- `i 31 0 li L ' Tcm\- \I uu,.nt. _ \, VT 5 C- �3`c Z 3 00 ,D = \,io50 Gtr I 30 13? 11 0 11� ••��ea�ie/`i--___.-.per 5 o O K \.[e7 c,4 ORIFICE DIAMETER WORKSHEET 'roject Name :— ple� r- -� -'j i...1.; Ju3 Ei ty F!.e Number : 1°1333 Computed By : 35D Date : I%. 17 0 PROV:DE SKETCH 5E_CW Cc OUTLET STRUCTURE N.. 7RE.ruDrr s.JRFACZ D. iAT>ON t 1 I. rAe= . C .4.43$ SCREW • I 0 . %. ...] EI•CV. 13(0•(71/0•43 Borrow •Vertu SE'�ER OUT 1.----4,1 I.. l • 4 1 X74. \ 71 t 3/4- cans R( I. !• s t t 2•—c I I I CA .. WATER QUA.r.t'TY . i"'�:NDED DRY Given: POND OUTFLOW DEVICE C ' 0 . 61 g la 32. 2 Design • S feet o.° head_ Solve for As A • p ./ ( C ( 2qh ) ' 5 ] • • : . A 61 °'°°9 / ( 0.-61 ( 2 x 32. 2-x 5 ) . 5 c • . a . ) l (head) . A Ta O.000 °i 8q, ft. (orifice area) • So'_ve for D: A s pi . ( R) 2 • _ R • (A / p?. ) ' .. 311 ( 00009 / 3. 14) • = 0 ,011 ft. 0 ( area ) —�• 2 x R x !12 - OA 0 inches wit-furl PIPE SIZE CALCULATIONS Project No. 99333 Designed by: BSD Date: 11-14-00 Checked by: KSM Date: Project Name: EMPIRE BATTERY _ Page: 1 of 1 DESIGN INVERT SECTION DESIGN CALCULATIONS DESIGN INCR. TOTAL PRECIP- INCR. TOTAL ELEVATIONS RUNOFF SLOPE DIA. CAPACITY VELOCITY LENGTH UPPER LOWER MH to MH OR TIME TIME ITATION AREA AREA ST to ST T Tt P A IA Q S d Of Vf L minutes minutes inches acres acres cfs "/o Inches cfs fps feet CB1 - CB2 5.0 5.0 3.45 0.163 0.163 0.15 0.50% 4 0.19 2.23 93 143.00 142.54 CB2 - J1 0.7 5.7 3.45 0.140 0.303 0.27 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 58 142.45 142.16 DS1 - DS2 5.0 5.0 3.45 0.071 0.071 0.06 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 40 145.00 144.60 DS2 - DS3 0.2 5.2 3.45 0.071 0.142 0.13 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 40 144.60 144.20 DS3- DS4 0.2 5.4 3.45 0.071 0.213 0.19 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 40 144.20 143.80 DS4 - DS5 0.2 5.6 3.45 0.071 0.284 0.25 1.00% 4 0.27 3.15 40 143.80 143.40 DS5 - J1 0.2 5.8 3.45 0.071 0.355 0.31 1.00% 6 0.81 4.13 107 143.32 142.25 J1 - J2 0.3 6.2 3.45 - 0.658 0.56 0.50% 6 0.57 2.92 97 142.16 141.68 CB3 - CB4 5.0 5.0 3.45 0.120 0.120 0.11 2.20% 4 0.41 4.67 94 144.00 141.93 CB4 -J2 0.3 5.3 3.45 0.259 0.379 0.34 2.20% 4 0.41 4.67 5 141.93 141.82 J2- CB5 0.6 6.7 3.45 - 1.037 0.87 0.50% 8 1.23 3.54 91 141.59 141.14 CB5 - POND 0.4 7.2 3.45 0.136 1.173 0.97 0.50% 8 1.23 3.54 26 141.14 141.01 DS6 - DS7 5.0 5.0 3.45 0.016 0.016 0.01 3.00% 4 0.48 . 5.46 33 145.00 144.01 DS7 - DS8 0.1 5.1 3.45 0.035 0.051 0.05 3.00% 4 0.48 5.46 40 144.01 142.81 DS8 - POND 0.1 5.2 3.45 0.035 0.086 0.08 3.00% 4 0.48 5.46 30 142.81 141.91 NOTE PIPE Ci 'r rni c, n ATlnnic nr3r nnc-rr- e .I .., ...-..-, ,.. ..1.. .._ _____ _ KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.G.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S. C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 , 90, .163 , 98 , 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 . 0 90 . 0 .2 98 . 0 5. 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .15 7 . 67 1903 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: CB1-CB2 • i KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM i 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .303 , 98, 5 . 7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 . 0 90 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 5 . 7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .27 7 . 67 3537 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: CB2-J1 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A �. 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S . C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .142, 98, 5 . 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 1 . 0 90 . 0 . 1 98 . 0 5 .2 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .13 7 . 67 1658 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS2-DS3 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .213, 98 , 5 .4 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .2 . 0 90 . 0 .2 98 . 0 5 .4 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 19 7 . 67 2487 ENTER [d: ] [path] f ilename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS3-DS4 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A . 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S. C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10,24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .284, 98, 5 . 6 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 . 0 90 . 0 .3 98 . 0 5. 6 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .25 7. 67 3316 ENTER [d: ] [path] f ilename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS5-J1 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S. C.S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S. C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10 , 24, 3 .45 ******************** S . C.S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .355, 98 , 5 . 8 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 . 0 90 . 0 . 4 98 . 0 5 . 8 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 31 7 . 67 4145 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS5-J1 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S . TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM t. 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 658, 98, 6 . 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .7 . 0 90 . 0 . 7 98 . 0 6 .2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .56 7 . 67 7682 ENTER Ed: ] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: J1-J2 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, .379, 98, 5 .3 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .4 . 0 90 . 0 .4 98 . 0 5 .3 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) .34 7 . 67 4425 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: CB4-J2 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, 1 . 037, 98, 6 .7 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN 1. 0 . 0 90 . 0 1 . 0 98 . 0 6 .7 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .87 7 .67 12107 ENTER [d: ) [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: J2-CB5 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S . TYPE-1A ' 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C. S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION (HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S . C. S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A (IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 , 90, 1 . 173 , 98 , 7 . 2 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN 1 .2 . 0 90 . 0 1 .2 98 . 0 7 . 2 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 97 7 . 83 13694 ENTER [d: ] [path) f i 1 ename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: CB5-POND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S . C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24,3 .45 ******************** S .C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. . 1 0, 90, . 016, 98, 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 0 . 0 90 . 0 . 0 98 . 0 5 . 0 PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 01 7. 67 186 ENTER [d.:] [path] filename [ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS6-DS7 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS : 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S. C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24,3 .45 ******************** S.C.S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 051, 98, 5 . 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 1 . 0 90 . 0 .1 98 . 0 5 . 1 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 05 7 . 67 595 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename [.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS7-DS8 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS Version 4 .21B SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S .C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION . ENTER: FREQ (YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 10, 24, 3 .45 ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 .45" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0, 90, . 086, 98, 5 .2 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN .1 . 0 90. 0 . 1 98 . 0 5 .2 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL (CU-FT) . 08 7. 67 1004 ENTER [d:] [path] filename [ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: DS8-POND rnivc. It 001/002 rL Pride Disposal Co. Fa)C To: S. From: k,Q, L lr� (�� �• l L G V Date: 1 Fax: 3 q ... .. . � � � � o� Phone: Pages: Re: Attu: - 711 h QV ' �L1 2r ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment C) Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle TELEPHONE(503)025$177 FAX 0 (503)825-6179 •Gominents: ly11_,L.C+ /SPa 5 c(1 4 s owe ow, 7• r ,t.IL.' ? II:'- '�f�j ! r\trir - % ,, • ? 4 ,, •'-- d t f hi / . .;,5..2 • � irr dri #��3 i `} §;-Q/, &.;; 1 1, au < srril �rj a ; 1 c r-3J 1 . l',V....CI\ \ 1 I 1 I i 1 ri , I Al\ \ ,, ,..,:,. . r., ------1 1 \ L__Ct' 11 *( 1 �a V.\ z� 9,If;.. I a 1 - Ili! ,) 4-i • . . . irk I 1 \ § 1\ ' t i I, ---r t Jw.l •) \1i //777T,w 1T1.: ,1/7�. \. \ rill+ — • hr' -_ � I. ? .. i\I r 1 •i n I . i li\ & F i1• I ; �;!—F 1 r. !t :l s ' 11 1 I \ \ 4�� %�r�fi \ tau A � � � \ J •PL/1_1/i�u_r 'AA. \\\ i• I! i\i� h i." ���r����+++ID F! I" 4„ I /Ir ��s`► _ VOW n ! ��� �\fie�' — 21.E N i vi -- _ _� 11 -l! _ !f- - -- - , - i -- �-�l1N69-, __-_ -�_ • - - -- - -- • -- t, — i e.% 11. 1,3 {N7 ill .iii I 41gig; III - � 5 i 4 Al iii2t)* 1 Qt II 10' lid _ .. . :_ _ ... __ ma id 6E99-395-EOS °DNI 'IS3 ..4t 1 Z :Z T 00, 3I N f 600/Z0001 'TVCf1JCTf 7RTVI alrn non n ^y _. JAN. 9.2001 11 15A CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.3/9 r\` CN1CAQO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY After Recording. Return To: T3 Enterprises LLC 9920 SW 551h Street Portland. Oregon 97219 AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT(this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of DecemberZl, 2000 by and among EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, whose address is 7320 SW Bonita 0 Road. Tigard, OR 97223 ("Empire") and T3 ENTERPRISES LLC,an Oregon limited liability company, whose address is 9920 SW 55`h Street, Portland, OR 97219 ("T3"). RECITALS N A. Empire owns certain real property located at 7320 SW Bonita Road, Tigard, Washington Count}', State of Oregon, as described on the attached Exhibit A ("Parcel I"). C� B. T3 owns certain real property located south and east of Parcel 1, in Tigard, Washington County. State of Oregon, as described on the attached Exhibit B ("Parcel 2"). C. Parcel l and Parcel 2 adjoin each other. A narrow portion of Parcel 2, extending north from the main body of Parcel 2 to SW Bonita Road, forms the eastern boundary of Parcel 1. D. Pursuant to that certain Site Development Review and Minor Land Partition approval dated May 4, 2000 and issued under File No. 2000-00002 (the "Approval"), the City of Tigard has approved certain development of Parcels 1 and 2. E. As referenced in the Approval, under the City of Tigard Community Development Code(the "Code"), access to Parcel 1 across Parcel 2 is desirable. Access for Parcel 2 across a portion of Parcel 1 is also desirable. The parties wish to facilitate access to and from their respective parcels so as to meet the requirements of the Code and the Approval. F. Shared stormrvater drainage systems and fire suppression systems will also be beneficial for the development of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. G. Partition Plat No. 2000-084, recorded on November 14, 2000 as Document No, 2000091987 in the plat records of Washington County, Oregon(the "Plat") shows PAGE l -AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT vz JAN. 9.2001 11 15A CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.4/9 the location and configuration of Certain casements for access,storniwatcr drainage and tire suppression systems as desired by the parties. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, including the mutual covenants, benefits and obligations set forth in this Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which arc hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Access Easements. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, T3 hereby grants,bargains. sells and conveys to Empire and its successors and assigns a perpetual. non-exclusive casement for use of a driveway across the northern portion of Parcel 2 (the "Empire Access Easement Area"),as shown on thePlat and labeled "Common Non- Exclusive Easement for Benefit of Parcels I and 2", for ingress and egress to and from Parcel 1. and for no other purpose. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, Empire hereby grants. bargains. sells and conveys to T3 and its successors and assigns a perpetual, non- exclusive easement for use ofa driveway across the southeastern part of Parcel 1,as shown on the Plat and labeled "Common Non-Exclusive Easement for Benefit of Parcels I and 2" (the "T3 Access Easement Area") for ingress and egress to and from Parcel 2, and for no other purpose. 2. Maintenance of the Access Easement Area. The cost of ordinary and necessary repair and maintenance of the Empire Access Easement Area and the T3 Access Easement Area, excluding paving and re-paving, shall be the responsibility of Empire and T3, allocated proportionately on an annual basis in accordance with the volume of use attributable to Empire and T3. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in this Agreement, if Empire or T3 cause damage to the driveway on the Empire Access Easement Area or the T3 Access Easement Area due to negligence or abnormal use, the party who caused the damage shall repair it at its sole cost and expense. 3. Paving and Improvement. Unless the parties otherwise agree in writing to share the cost of improvements and paving to the Empire Access Easement Area and the T3 Access Easement Area in advance of such work being done, such improvements and paving shall be solely for the account of the party undertaking the same. 4. Grant of Utility Easements. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, T3 hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to Empire and its successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for the installation, repair,maintenance, and use of an underground stormwater drainage system and above-ground stormwater pond on those parts of Parcel 2 that are shown on the Plat and labeled "10'Wide Private Storm Drain Easement for Benefit of Parcel 1" and "Private Storm Drainage Easement for the Benefit of Parcel I" (the "Empire Stormwater Easement Area"). Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, T3 hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to Empire and its successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for the installation, repair,maintenance, and use of an underground fire suppression system, with above-ground fire hydrants,on that same part of Parcel 2 as the Empire Stormwater Easement area(the "Empire Fire Suppression System Easement Area"), Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Empire hereby grants, bargains, sells and conveys to T3 and its successors and assigns a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for the installation, repair, maintenance, and use of an underground fire suppression PAGE 2—AGREEMENT Fog RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT 3 • JAN. 9.2 01 11: 16AM CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.5/9 system, with above-ground fire hydrants, on that part of Parcel I where such fire suppression system exists as of the date of this Agreement (the "T3 Fire Suppression System Easement Arca"), 5, Maintenance of the Stormwater System and the Fire Suppression System. The cost of ordinary and necessary repair and maintenance of the stormwater drainage system and the fire suppression system shall be the responsibility of Empire and T3. allocated proportionately on an annual basis in accordance with the volume of use attributed to Empire and T3. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in this Agreement, if Empire or T3 cause damage to the stormwater drainage system or the fire suppression system due to negligence or abnormal use, the party who caused the damage shall repair it at its sole cost and expense. 6. Construction of the Stormwater System and the Fire Suppression System. Unless the parties otherwise agree in writing to share the cost of constructing and installing the stormwater drainage system and the fire suppression system in advance of such work being done, such improvements shall be solely for the account of the party undertaking the same. 7, Definition of"Easement Areas". For the purposes of this Agreement,the Empire Access Easement Area, the T3 Access Easement Area,the Empire Stormwater Easement Area, the Empire Fire Suppression Easement Area, and the T3 Fire Suppression Easement Area are collectively referred to as the "Easement Areas." 8. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Empire shall indemnify and hold harmless T3 from any and all loses,claims, and liabilities arising from or associated with Empire's use of the Easement Areas. To the fullest extent allowed by law,T3 shall indemnify and hold Empire harmless from any and all leases, claims, and liabilities arising from or associated with T3's use of the Easement Areas. 9. Successors and Assigns. The easements conveyed herein shall run with the land,and shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, subsequent owners of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. 10. Breach;Attorney Fees. if either party fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement, the other party shall have all of the rights and remedies available at law or in equity, including but not limited to suit for specific performance and injunctive relief. If any suit or action is instituted to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its attorney fees and costs, including those incurred on appeal, as determined by the court. 1 1. AS-IS. Empire and T3 hereby acknowledge that they accept the Easement Areas AS-IS, subject to all existing easements, valid rights and uses, and all matters of public record. 12. Insurance. Each party shall at all times during the term of this Agreement maintain in full force and effect comprehensive public liability insurance covering its Parcel with PACE 3—AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT /'�-- • JAN. 9.2001 11: 16AN CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER N0.943 P.6/9 a financially responsible insurance company or companies, including coverage for any accident resulting in bodily injury to or death of any person and consequential damages arising therefrom, and comprehensive property damage insurance, each in an amount not less than S1,000.000 combined single limit coverage. Each party's liability insurance policy shall name the other party as art additional named insured and shall contain a provision that the policy may not be canceled without 30 days' prior written notice given to the other party. 13. No Public Dedication. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Areas to the general public or for any public purpose whatsoever. 14, No Third-Parry Beneficiary. it being the intention of the parties that this Agreement be strictly limited to and for the purposes expressed herein, no person shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary under this Agreement, 15, Compliance With Law. Each party shall fully comply with all applicable laws, the Code, and the Approval, to the extent they apply to the property owned by each party. 16. Notices. All notices that are or may be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and addressed to a party at its address first set forth above or such other address as maybe prescribed by notice to the other party. A notice may be given by hand delivery and, if so, it is effective upon delivery. A notice may be given by certified mail, return receipt requested and, if so, it is effective on the third business day after placement in the U.S. mail, excluding the day of deposit,properly addressed and postage prepaid. 1 7. Captions. The captions used in this Agreement are for the convenience of the parties and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Empire and T3 have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. T3 ENTERPRISES, LLC By_1 L✓1 � - Victor G. Shoepe, President Judy .'Shoepe,Manager By Victor G. Shoepe,Manager O3osooku0001js5571 Voo4 PAGE 4- AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT f5--- JAN. 9.2001 11: 17AM CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.7/9 STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z$ _day of December. 2000, by Victor G. Shoepe as President of Empire Batteries, Inc., an Oregon corporation. H.:2 ),„ Qt'FiCIAI SEAL NnTngr .+;iIi'IL OI.1GGUN COMM.SSIVN NJ.•s27663 M I:aMr, ssloN tXP FES CC (JAW' 3, 2003 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: lb I�fd3 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss, County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21 day of December, 2000, by Victor G. Shoepe as Manager of T3 Enterprises LLC, an Oregon limited liability company,on behalf of the company. 07FICIAL SEAL .--.-1... ' ;, WERER (: / 12.11 v /' NOT ARI' PUBLIC OREGON "I!— ` '" COMMISSION Ne.s375S3 Notary Public for Oregon :4Y ,.:0;,1PISSION EXP;AES OC'I 3, 003 My Commission Expires: ,Of 3b3 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2$ day of December, 2000, by Judy A. Shoepe as Manager of T3 Enterprises LLC, an Oregon limited liability company,on behalf of the company. .0111/14.)_. —Z OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Public for Oregon ` � NOTARY PU1"Ec•oRsGoN My Commission Expires: lb 13 f d� -- COMMISSION NO.327583 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 5 2103 030300N000o1‘345571 V001 PAGE 5—AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT 6.) JAN. 9.2001 11: 17AM CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER _NO.94j„...--P.8/91.r..... EXHIBIT A J..cgal Description of Parch Parcel I. Partition Plat 2000-084, in the City of Tigard. County of Washington and State of Orcgon. PAGE 6—AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT 7 1 . . . JAN. 9.2001 11:17AM CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.9/9 EXHIBIT B 1 cjzal Description of Parcel 2 Parcel 2. Partition Plat 2000-084, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. 030500000015571 V004 Fe PAGE 7-AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT JAN. 9.2001 11: 15AM CHICAGOTITLE PIONEER NO.943 P.2/9 STATE OF OREGON ) SS County of Washington • rtnent. Jerry 1R A��sor�. DkecTOf of Assess- e ttlon Old Ex-Ohlcio County Clerk for said ookfuty.,do hereby artily that the within instfeatailiti was received and recorded in plok of ngclorch of said county. :tit ,+ .-0. ,.tP : {} Jerry. +4airtson, Director of Assessment and Taxation.Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 2000104184 Rect: 269609 57.00 12/29/2000 02; 21:53pm JAN.10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.2/7 %HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY \\ We certify this instru ent to 1)0 42 Copy Allr4 records ilCZ=Za+417177* 6401e2 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: � �®� A r 1P (L T3 Enterprises LLC �' "" , ci�,�ria+o C " 9920 SW 55th Street CHICAGO TI E INSURANCE COMPANY Portland, Oregon 97219 PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENT DATED: January 9, 2001 BETWEEN: EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC., an Oregon corporation P.O. Box 23962 Tigard, OR 97281-3962 ("Empire") AND: T3 ENTERPRISES LLC, an Oregon limited liability company 9920 SW 55th Street Portland, OR 97219 ("T3") 171 RECITALS A. Empire owns the real property located at 7320 SW Bonita Road, Tigard, Oregon, County of Washington, State of Oregon, as more particularly described on Exhibit A("Parcel r'). B. T3 owns the adjacent real property, located south and east of Parcel I, as more particularly described on Exhibit B ("Parcel II"). C. Pursuant to that certain Site Development Review and Minor Land Partition approval dated May 4, 2000 and issued under File No. 2000-00002 (the"Approval"), the City of Tigard has approved certain development of Parcels I and II(the"Approved Site Plan"). D. As referenced in the Approval,under the City of Tigard Community Development Code(the"Code"), certain specific minimums and maximums of parking spaces are required per 1,000 square feet of floor area space. Absent this Agreement,Parcel I would have more than the maximum number of parking spaces,and the number of parking spaces associated with Parcel II would be below the minimum required by the Code. E. The parties wish to reallocate the parking spaces between Parcel I and Parcel II to meet the requirements of the Code and the Approval. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties set forth in this Agreement, Empire and T3 agree as follows: 1 JAN. 10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.3/7 1. Parking Rights License, Etnpire grants to T3 an irrevocable non-exclusive license (the"License") to use, for the benefit of Parcel II, up to eleven(11) additional parking spaces located on the westerly part of Parcel I, between the west side of the building now located on Parcel I and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way that adjoins both Parcel I and Parcel II to the west, excluding any spaces designated as handicapped spaces for the use of Parcel I(the "Licensed Spaces"), The Licensed Spaces shall be for the use of T3, its employees, agents, customers, and invitees 2. Reconfiguration of Parking. Empire agrees not to reconfigure its parking lot in any way that would unreasonably interfere with T3's rights under this Agreement, including by reducing the number of parking spaces available for T3's use. 3. Maintenance. T3 shall have the sole responsibility for maintenance and repair of the Licensed Spaces until such time as the License is terminated by mutual agreement of the parties. Empire shall have no responsibility for maintenance or repair of the Licensed Spaces. 4. Insurance. At all times T3 shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance, in an amount not less than$1,000,000 combined single limit coverage, including coverage for any accident resulting in bodily injury, death or property damage and consequential damages arising there from, covering the Licensed Spaces, and shall name Empire as an additional insured. All such policies shall contain a provision that Empire, although an additional insured, shall nevertheless be named as a loss payee and be entitled to recover under said policies for any loss occasioned to it, its employees, agents, contractors, invitees and licensees by reason of the negligence of T3,its employees, agents, contractors, invitees and licensees. T3 shall furnish Empire with a certificate of insurance with respect to such policies upon demand of Empire. 5. Relationship With Third Parties. 5.1 Information to Lenders. In connection with any financing of Parcel I or Parcel II, each party agrees to promptly furnish to the other's prospective or actual lender(s) information pertaining to this Agreement, as requested by the other party in writing,provided that such information is not of a confidential or proprietary nature. 5.2 Subordination. This Agreement and each party's rights under this Agreement are automatically subordinated to the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust and related loan documents that may encumber Parcel I or Parcel II. Each party agrees to confirm such subordination in writing, if requested by the other party's lender. 5.3 Estoppels. Upon the request of either T3 or Empire, the other party agrees to execute and deliver to the requesting party an estoppel certificate confirming: whether this Agreement is in full force and effect, whether there have been any modifications to this Agreement, whether any defaults exist under the terms of this Agreement, the number of reserved parking spaces provided by this Agreement, and other similar factual information. 2 JAN.10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.4/7 6. General Provisions. 6.1 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors. This Agreement is not intended to and does not create any third-party beneficiary rights. 6.2 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Empire, except Empire will assign this Agreement to any subsequent owner of Parcel I. This Agreement may not be assigned by T3, except that T3 will assign this Agreement to any subsequent owner of Parcel II, subject to the terms of Section 2 above. 6.3 No Third-Party Beneficiary. It being the intention of the parties that this Agreement be strictly limited to and for the purposes expressed herein,no person shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary under this Agreement. 6.4 Compliance With Law. Each party shall fully comply with all applicable laws, the Code, and the Approval, to the extent they apply to the property owned by that party. 6.5 Complete Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and final agreement of the parties with respect to the matters covered by this Agreement and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements on the same subject. 6.6 Notices. All notices that are or may be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and addressed to a party at its address first set forth above or such other address as may be prescribed by notice to the other party. A notice may be given by hand delivery and, if so, it is effective upon delivery. A notice may be given by certified mail, return receipt requested, and, if so, it is effective on the third business day after placement in the U.S. mail, excluding the day of deposit, properly addressed and postage prepaid. 6.7 Attorneys Fees. In the event either party institutes litigation to enforce or interpret this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys fees as determined by the judge at any trial or upon any appeal or petition there from. 6.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Oregon. EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. T3 ENTERPRISES LLC c By: (C.A7/./Ltr,__Ajel-Ar''''-- By: Victor G. Shoepe, President Vi .r G. Shoepe, Manager By: It.. J� A. Sh.epe,Manager 3 J9N.10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.5/7 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 4 day of January, 2001 by Victor G. Shoepe, the President of EMPIRE BATTERIES, INC. OFFICIAL SEAL 47 L WEBER No ary ublic for Oregon `q"' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Mt)I,, COMMISSION N0.3275s3 My commission expires; - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 3,2003 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11 day of January, 2001 by Victor G, Shoepe, the Manager of T3 ENTERPRISES LLC. ,!;� ?... OF SEAL 0///449)2 1 ) L WEBER Notary Public for Oregon \4�a NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �� �3 COMMISSION NO.327563 My commission expires: �, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 3,2003 STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Multnomah ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l day of January, 2001 by Judy A. Shoepe, the Manager of T3 ENTERPRISES LLC. Icy OFFICIAL SEAL �_ • , L WEBER CfflAjd)--- `�. r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.327583 Notary Public for Oregon MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCT 5,2009 My commission expires: 10b 16� 000179\00007■345590 V003 4 JAN.10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.6/7 EXHIEIT A Legal Description of Parcel 1 Parcel 1, Partition Plat 2000-084, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. JAN.10.2001 4:57PM NO.086 P.7/7 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of Parcel 2 Parcel 2,Partition Plat 2000-084, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon. 000 t79\00007\345590 V003 JAN.11.20O1 11:01AM N0. 105 P.2/8 STATE Of OREGON t SS County of Washington•_ t Jerry •.�'1•im1s e of Maass - merit Cpunty meet aid �ikk-rwwlTalfyi,f•artltY that the tor,t�8id •• was received a Wit . ,r • of of said county. h►'r• ._ . Director of �Taxauon, Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 2001002008 52 00 Rect: 270191 01/10/2001 01:50 51pm Empire Business Park (1-23-01) To: Julia Hajduk City of Tigard Planning Department Response to Comments regarding SDR 2000-00002 and MLP 2000-00002. 1. The site plan has been revised to show the delineated wetland at the SW property corner, as noted in the wetland report. (We have also noted Plot ID # 2 & 3, which did not qualify as wetlands.) bt We have relocated the 10' x 20' solid waste and recycling area to the east in order to maintain the 24' clear driveway. 3. -A-Mop-of the landscape plan which was submitted o e wilding a meat, is - enclosed. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter. We will be clearing the brush and marking the riparian setback later this week. The temporary riparian setback fence should be set by early next week. Do want us to call you for the inspection? Sipcere , r John Bou in Project Manager