Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2000-00003
SDR2000 - 00003 RASMUSSEN PROJECT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION RASMUSSEN PROJECT ,41 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00003, cint®eeve Co p Commun i ment VARIANCE (VAR) 2000-00008 S(urpingABetterCommunity 120 DAYS =9/21/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT CASE NOS. Site Development Review (SDR) Type II SDR2000-00003 Variance (VAR) Type I Adjustment VAR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following: 1. New construction of a tri-plex and one detached unit in a multi-family complex on a lot with one existing detached single-family house. 2. A Type I Adjustment to the north and west setbacks to reduce tree removal. APPLICANT: Kenneth A. Rasmussen OWNERS: Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Ct. 603 Larkspur Ct. Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Sublimity, Oregon 97385 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3, 050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S126DC, Tax Lot 3700. The project is on the west side of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92' Avenue. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review is approved subject to certain conditions. A request for Type I Adjustment for a reduction to the rear yard setback to 16 feet, and the west side yard setback to eight feet to reduce tree removal, is APPROVED subject to certain conditions. The request to further reduce the rear yard setback to 10 feet is DENIED. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 39 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to Ipublic improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public mprovement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.0r.us). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$120.00. 4. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Coral Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local commercial industrial street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron Of applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Coral Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 5. A profile of SW Coral Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 6. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall show all work in the public right-of-way, including the sanitary sewer tap, water service tap(s) and storm drainage work. 7. The applicant shall p rovide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 39 8. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the ublic improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 9. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. 10. The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24- foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. 11. The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. 12. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18,755.050.0.3. 13. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced, or add one (1) additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0, and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size, including tree height and branching width at maturity, and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. 14. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area, and the branching width at maturity. 15. The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east, north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit #2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. 16. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5, or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of tax lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. 17. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. 18. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property (and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parkin lot. In addition, the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees (minimum 2' caliper at DBH) on the landscape plan, equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. 19. The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it is has selected, and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 39 20. The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G, Section 18.360.090.14, and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Building Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate the two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive, or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls, in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 21. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings, the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4, and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. 22. The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan, and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicant's arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly, and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. 24. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance Chapter 18.795, and figure 18.795.1. 25. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius, and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 26. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide screening in the form of a minimum five (5') foot high wooden fencing, and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun, for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. 27. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house, and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom, the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas, semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention, and to establish maintenance responsibility in accordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. 29. The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime prevention between Proposed Units #4 and #1, and in the parking lot at lighting levels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends "ground type lighting between Units #1 and #4, and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 39 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 31 . Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection(s). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 32. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 33. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 34. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,915.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 35. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Building Division (Bob Poskin 639-4171, ext 392) for review and approval: 36. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall clearly mark and sign all interior drives and access aisles to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 37. Prior to final building inspection, a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PROVISIONS; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 39 All sign changes and additions shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Tigard Development Code (TDC) Chapter 18.780, Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.780. TDC Section 18.725.020 requires compliance with applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. All future tenants shall be in compliance with the Environmental Performance Standard as set forth in federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations, and compliance is a continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795. In no case shall trees near the access have branches below eight feet. The applicant shall comply with State and Federal regulations regarding the disturbance of archaeological sites and Native American graves under the Indian Graves Protection Statutes (ORS 97.740.990) and the Protection of Archaeological Sites (ORS 358.905.955 and ORS 390.235.240). The applicant shall stop work and immediately notify the Oregon State Historic Preservation office, and the City of Tigard Planning Division. If suspected Native American human remains are found follow these procedures: First call the nearest office of the State Police; Second, if the remains are Native American, call the Legislative Commission on Indian Services at the State Capitol at 503-968-1067; and Third, call the State Historic Preservation Office at 503-378-4168, ext. 232. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is located in a predominately existing single-family residential use area which is zoned R-12, with the exception of property to the north zoned R.5. There is an existing single-family residence with attached garage on the site. Vicinity Information: The site is located west of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92nd Avenue. To the north of the site is property zoned R-4.5 in detached single-family use. To the east and west of the site is property zoned R-12 Medium Density Residential in detached single-family use. To the southeast of the site is a vacant lot zoned R-12. To the southwest of the site is a lot with a detached single-family dwelling zoned R-12. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is comprised of one lot, Tax Lot 3700. The existing house is proposed to be retained, and will become part of the multi-family complex. The proposal includes the new construction of a tri-plex and a detached dwelling unit on a lot with an existing house which is to be retained. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct four new dwelling units, and retain one existing detached single-family residence on the same lot. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Household Living. The site is located within the Medium Density Residential District. Table 18.510.1 lists Household Living Retail as a permitted use in the R-12 zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 39 • This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice, and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Officer. Type I procedures apply to ministerial permits and actions containing clear and objective approval criteria. Type I actions are decided by the Director without public notice and without a public hearing. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Two letters of comment were received from neighboring property owners as follows: Summary Hansen Letter: One letter was received from June Hansen of 9395 SW Coral Street dated June 13, 2000, and received June 15, 2000. The Hansen property abuts the subject property to the west. Hansen is in opposition to the proposed project and to the granting of a variance to the west side setback requirements. The basis that she gives for her objection is TDC Chapter 18.360.010, Purpose, General Purpose 3. Her objection includes the following: 1 . The types of structures to be built are not similar to others in the neighborhood, or in the Washington Square Town Center. 2. Objection to the adjustment to the west side setback is based on Section 18.360.090. "He has met (1) "Preservation of existing trees" at the expense of (3) "Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate lighting, circulation and fire-fighting." 3. Concern regarding protection of the massive fir trees, over 100 years old with shallow roots, that may be disturbed by ongoing development of the project. Review of this project by an arborist is warranted. Staff Response to Hansen letter: 1 . The applicable approval criteria in the Tigard Community Development code are listed and addressed in this decision. The site is zoned R-12 and surrounded by property zoned R-12. It is the zone, rather than the use that governs in most of the standards, except the buffering and screening standards. 2. The west side setback reduction is limited to the rear of the lot adjacent to Proposed Unit #2 which is adjacent to the far-north end of the rear yard of June Hansen, not adjacent to any buildings on her property. 3. Protection of existing trees is addressed under Section 18.360.090.A.2, Relationship to the natural and physical environment. An arborist report was submitted with this land-use application and is available for public review. Staff agrees that great care should be taken to preserve all significant trees, including all trees over 12" in caliper. Summary Zimmerman/Fisher letter: A second letter was received from the property owner, Larry and Donna Zimmerman, to the immediate east of the subject site at 9335 SW Coral St. The property owners, Michael and Randy Fisher, located at 9255 SW Coral St. also signed the letter in support of the concern about drainage and run-off issues, issue # 5 below. A summary of the issues raised by the neighboring property owner are as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 39 1. The abutting property to east is zoned R-12, however, the property is in single-family use. Zimmerman requests that their property be entitled to the same consideration as if the property were zoned for Low Density Residential District. 2. The proposed fence for screening the Rasmussen Project to the east is located on their property to the east, not on Mr. Rasmussen's property. Concern is raised about who will own the fence and who will be responsible for upkeep of the fence. The Zimmerman's request that Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and directed to construct a solid 8-foot site obscuring fence inside his property line. 3. Concern is raised about the location of tenant dwellings at about 10 feet above their rear windows. "A person standing at or in the front of the proposed tenant dwelling would have clear line of sight into our family room, kitchen, dining room, back yard and patio area. Screening is insufficient and there is no qualifying vegetation. Additional screening is needed. The Zimmerman's request that Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and be required to provide a noise/sound screen of Arborvitae, 8- foot at planting, on not less than 36" centers, and two trees of suitable height to immediately screen direct line of sight into the rearward areas of our home. 4. There is insufficient screening of the trash collection area which is located 20 feet from our rear patio. The Zimmerman's request that the rubbish container area be moved to another location or heavily screened and covered to avoid odor and noise pollution in our back yard. 5. Concern is raised about drainage and run-off control. "A very high water table exists in our neighborhood. Durinc the wet winter months, our property and those to the east collect significant down sill seepage from the higher properties to the north and to the east. The Rasmussen Project will affect this movement of water. It appears that what was ground water, or seepage will now be run off because of the impervious surfaces created by the project. The current volume of water running in the culvert/ditch drainage system already causes down stream flooding each year. The impact of additional volume from impervious surface run-off would be significant and is of concern to the down stream neighborhood." The Zimmerman's together with the Fisher's, request that Mr. Rasmussen be required to upgrade the existing culvert water drainage system east ward to 90th Avenue to accommodate the additional water run-off created by the impervious surfaces. Staff Response to Zimmerman/Fisher letter: 1 . The Tigard Community Development Chapter 18.510, Residential Zoning District, provides the Development Standards for the R-12 zoning district under Section 18.510.050 and Table 18.510.0. With the exception of the Table 18.745.1 Buffer Matrix which considers the existing use rather than the zone, most TDC standards related to compatibility with the abutting property are applied to the zoning district rather than the existing use. 2. Screening is required to be provided and maintained by the applicant/owner on his property, unless the adjacent property owner agrees to the use of the fence for screening on their property, and a maintenance agreement is signed between the parties, and City of Tigard to maintain the fence and any other screening required. his issue is addressed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745, Section 18.745.050, and 18.360.090.4. 3. One-story dwelling Unit #3 at the northeast corner of the subject site is located approximately 68 feet from the northwest corner of the attached garage on the neighboring property to the east. Therefore, the Zimmerman's description of very close proximity (within 10 feet) of the multi-plex to their dwelling does not appear to be accurate. The applicant meets the required 30-foot setback to the east property in accordance with Chapter 18.510 and Table 18.510.2. This issue is addressed further in this decision under Section 18.510.050, Chapter 18.745, Section 18.745.050, and Section 18.360.090.4. • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 39 4. Screening of the trash recycling area is addressed under Chapter 18.755 and Section 18.745.050.E.4, Screening of refuse containers. 5. Drainage and run-off issues are addressed under Section 18.810.100A in this decision. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Zoning Districts 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) B. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.715 Density Computation) 18.720 Design Compatibility) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) Land Use Decisions C. 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) D. 18.370 Variance) E. 18.390 Impact Study Section 18.390.040) F. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of these Specific Development Standard Code Chapters: 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18,740 (Historic Overlay), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (S(Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 ensitive Lands), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.797 (Water Resources Overlay District), 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Residential Zoning District: Section 18.510.020 Lists the description of the Residential Zoning Districts. The site is located in the R-12 zoning district: Medium Density Residential. Development Standards: Section 18.510.050 States that Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 9 OF 39 EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES t R_y 2 . STANDARIll '" ' ,. , ,t,: ;MFDU* Proposed, SF DU** Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit -Attached unit -Duplexes -Boarding,lodging,rooming house Average Lot Width None None None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. 17ft-9inches 15 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. N/A 10 ft. -Side yard 10 ft. 8 ft.—1 inch. 5 ft.[1] -Rear yard 20 ft. 16 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. -Distance between property line and garage entrance 20 ft. N/A ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage[2] 80% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% 20% [1]Except this shall not apply to attached units on the lot line on which the units are attached. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit ** Single-family dwelling unit The total site area is 18,719 square feet. The total building footprint area for the site is approximately 4,584 square feet. The total building and impervious surface area is approximately 11,115 square feet, or 59% according to the applicant's figures. The proposed lot coverage does not exceed the maximum lot coverage requirement of 80%. According to the applicant, the total combined landscape area on the site is 7,604 square feet, however, for purposes of calculating landscaping percentage, the private outdoor and shared outdoor space must be deducted in accordance with Section 18.360.0 J0.A.12b for multi-family units. Therefore, 800 square feet must be deducted for shared outdoor recreation space and 400 for private outdoor space, reducing the total landscaping coverage to 6,404 square feet which is 34.2%. Therefore, the landscaping percentage exceeds the minimum landscape requirement of 20%. The (north) rear yard setback is proposed to be either 10 or 16 feet, and the west side yard setback is proposed at eight (8') feet. As the rear and side yard setbacks do not meet the minimum setback requirements of 20 feet and 10 feet respectively, the applicant has submitted a request for an Adjustment to these setbacks to reduce tree removal. The setback requests are addressed under a Type I Adjustment under Section 18.370.020.C.7 in this decision. The request for a 10-foot rear yard is denied, however, the request for a 16-foot rear yard and 8-foot west side yard adjacent to Unit#2 only is approved (see adjustment analysis page 32). The proposed new multi-family dwelling units are to be one story in height, and are approximately 16 feet to the peak of the gable roof, and 12 feet to the midpoint on the gable roof. The proposed height is well below the maximum height allowed of 35 feet. FINDING: Maximum height, maximum lot coverage, and minimum landscape coverage standards area are met. The east and south side yard setback standards are met. The proposed plans (dated 4/20/00) which incorporates a 16-foot rear yard setback, and an 8-foot west side yard requires a Type I Adjustment to reduce setbacks due to tree preservation and is subject to the criteria under Section 18.370.020.0.7. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 10 OF 39 B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. The applicable Tigard Community Development Code (TDC) criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VI. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the TDC: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; This standard is not applicable as this is a proposed residential use. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Each residential dwelling within the multi-family development is proposed to be connected by a walkway to the parking area, and to the areas demarked for shared outdoor recreation. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does not cross the vehicle access drive or parking lot. The proposed walkway does not meet the dimensional and design requirements of this standard and the site plan shall be revised as follows: The applicant shall ensure that the walkway shall have a minimum 6-inch vertical dimension at the curb along the edge of the parking lot area. Because the walkway shall be a minimum four-foot clear width, the proposed auto overhang (at the parking spaces) shall not be greater than one-foot, and shall be dimensioned on the plan. The walkway shall be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and ADA standards. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant proposes concrete walkways. No lighting is proposed for the site other than wall mounted lights attached to the individual dwelling units. The Police Department has provided comments with regard to lighting for the site. Proposed wall mounted lighting on the individual units is not adequate for crime prevention and safety. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 11 OF 39 FINDING: The standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. H. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; TABLE 18.705.2 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE Dwelling Units Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Sidewalks, Driveways Required Required etc. 1-2 1 15' 10' 3-19 1 30' 24' if two-way, 15' if one-way: Curbs and 5'walkway required 20-49 1 30' 24' if two-way or 2 30' 15' if one-way: Curbs and 5' walkway required 50-100 2 30' 24' Curbs and 5'walkway required As there are five (5) units proposed, a minimum of one (1) access is required with a thirty (30') foot minimum access required, and minimum pavement width of twenty-four (24') feet for the two-way traffic. The applicant proposes two accesses to the site as follows: 1) Retention of the existing access (south of the existing house) which has a roughly 19-foot apron at the street and is proposed to be re-paved with an 11'-6' minimum pavement width, and 2) a new access with a 30-foot access and 24-foot minimum pavement width with curbs and 5-foot sidewalk. However, the applicant's site and landscape plans do not clearly indicate the proper access width. 2. Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling units; Vehicular access to this multi-family complex is within 25 feet of the ground floor entrances to all of proposed new dwellings. 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code; Private residential access drives are proposed, therefore, this criterion is met. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet;. c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 12 OF 39 The proposed access drive is approximately 89 feet in length, therefore, this criteria does not apply. However, comments from the Building Division, state that this proposed project does not comply with Fire Department access radius, 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. The access shall be re-designed in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. 5. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; This criterion is not applicable as the proposed driveways are do not exceed 200 feet in length. 6. Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. The driveway approach is to a local street (Coral Street), therefore, this criterion is inapplicable. FINDING: This standard has not been met as the applicant has not clearly dimensioned the width of the proposed accesses at the street and has not met the requirements for fire access radius. Therefore, in order to satisfy this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24-foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. DENSITY COMPUTATIONS: CHAPTER 18.715 Density Calculation: 18.715.020 A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: • All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. • All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; • All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. • All land proposed for private streets; and • A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. The site area is 18,719 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R-12 zone is 3,050 square feet for multi-family dwelling units. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units er net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. The maximum number of residential units for the entire site is calculated by dividing 18,719 by 3,050 square feet per unit which equals 6.13 and is rounded down to six (6) units. The applicant proposes 5 units including the existing house. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard for maximum density is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 13 OF 39 C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The minimum number of residential units for the site is calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units 6.13 x 80% which equals 4.90, and is rounded up to five (5) units. As five (5) units are proposed, this standard is met. FINDING: The standard for minimum density is met. Applicability of Provisions: 18.720.020 These provisions apply to all multi-family and attached single-family residential projects in zoning districts R-4.5 through R-40 that abut property zoned for single-family residential development. These standards are applicable to this site as the abutting property to the north is zoned R-4.5, Low Density Residential, which is considered to be zoned for "single-family residential development." Design standards: Section 18.720.030 18.720.030 Design Standards A. Density transition. When a multi-family or attached single-family project abuts property zoned for detached single-family, the following design standards shall apply: This standard is applicable as this is a multi-family project in R-12, Medium Density Residential, abutting property zoned R-4.5, Low Density Residential, to the north. As this site abuts property zoned R-12 to the east, south and west, the standards related to building height and planes are only considered applicable to the north facing facades of Proposed Units #1, 2, and 3. The applicability of all the other design standards are addressed via the staff response to each standard. 1. Building height shall not exceed two stories or 25 feet within 30 feet of the property line or three stories or 35 feet within 50 feet of the property line; The building height is 12 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof (and 16 feet to the peak) on all of the proposed new units, and does not exceed this standard at any location on the site, therefore, this criterion is met. 2. Building planes for multi-family dwellings within 50 feet of the common property line(s) and abutting public rights-of-way shall be subject to the following standards: All of the proposed new multi-family dwelling units have building planes within 50 feet of the common property line, therefore, this criterion is applicable. a. No building plane that faces the common property line shall exceed 960 square feet within 30 feet or 1,400 square feet within 50 feet of the property line; The front and rear building planes are approximately 270 square feet. The side building planes are approximately 382 square feet. There is no building plane greater than 30 feet on the proposed new units. Therefore, none of the building planes on the proposed new units exceed 960 square feet within 30 feet. b. No building plane shall have a dimension greater than 40 feet in length or 35 feet in height; There is no building plane greater than 30 feet on the proposed new units, therefore, this criterion is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 14 OF 39 c. If more than one building plane faces a property line and building planes align at a common distance from the line, the building planes shall be horizontally separated by at least 20 feet. For purposes of this standard, "common distance" shall be defined as within 12 feet; Proposed Units #1 and 3 are aligned at a common distance from the north property line, and are separated horizontally by approximately 30 feet by Proposed Unit #2. Therefore, this criterion is met. d. Building plane is defined as a surface that includes a building wall that extends from the ground to the top of each wall of a structure. Area is determined by multiplying the length of each wall by the height. The plane does not include roof area. When a structure along a wall juts out from the wall, or is off-set from an adjacent part less than four feet, the structure is considered part of the building plane of the wall behind it. If the structure protrudes more than four feet, it represents a separate building plane. If a building plane is at an angle in relation to the property line, the midpoint of the wall shall provide the point at which the plane and related distances are measured. These concepts are illustrated in Figure 18.720.1. These concepts are applied in the criteria above and below in this Section of the decision. No building plane is at an angle to the property line, therefore, this portion of the criterion is not applicable. B. Front facades. All primary ground-floor common entries or individual unit entries of street frontage units shall be oriented to the street, not to the interior or to a parking lot. The front elevation of large structures must be divided into smaller areas or planes of 500 square feet or less. Projecting features such as porches, balconies, bays and dormer windows and roof pediments are encouraged for structures facing a street to create visual interest. This criterion is not applicable as the buildings are oriented with their entries to the south, away from the property zoned R-4.5. FlGURE IE ILLUSTRATION OF DESIGN CONCEPTS Prink lilld10 •ao a.p III`` VIII It `�C�Cen os'Fi.P.-.F.� L.ss AwL4 3 Rangy ('IS. , T1 Olk IF tw�(i.,s Plawc b.gRr..k III�IINIIIi 9010 !LAIN! g w 3illll�� �711i111i1,� • • C. Main entrance. Primary structures must be oriented with their main entrance facing the street upon which the project fronts. If the site is on a corner, it may have its main entrance oriented to either street or at the corner. This criterion is addressed above under B. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 15 OF 39 D. Unit definition. Each dwelling unit shall be emphasized by including a roof dormer or bay windows on the street-facing elevation, or by providing a roof gable or porch that faces the street. Ground-level dwelling units shall include porches that shall be at least 48 square feet in area with no dimension less than six feet. This criterion is not applicable as the street-facing elevations face property zoned R-12. E. Roof lines. Roof-line offsets shall be provided at intervals of 40 feet or less to create variety in the massing of structures and to relieve the effect of a single, long roof. Roof line offsets shall be a minimum 4-foot variation either vertically from the gutter line or horizontally. The attached dwelling units which back to the property zoned R-4.5 are staggered with 5-foot variation horizontally, therefore, this criterion is met. F. Trim detail. Trim shall be used to mark all building roof lines, porches, windows and doors that are on a primary structure's street-facing elevation(s). As the north facade is not street facing, this standard does not apply. However, it is recommended that the applicant provide trim detail in accordance with this standard. G. Mechanical equipment. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, other than vents or ventilators, shall be located and constructed so as to be screened from ground-level view. Screening shall be integrated with exterior building design. No roof-mounted mechanical equipment is indicated on the elevations, other than vents, therefore, this criterion is satisfied. If mechanical equipment is intended to be placed on the roofs, and can be viewed from the property to the north, then the elevations shall be revised in accordance with this standard. H. Parking. Parking and loading areas may not be located between the primary structure(s) and the street upon which the structure fronts. It there is no alley and motor vehicle access is from the street, parking must be provided: 1. In a garage that is attached to the primary structure; 2. In a detached accessory structure located at least 50 feet from the front property line; or 3. In a parking area at the side or rear of the site. This standard is not applicable as the proposed parking and loading area fronts property zoned R12. I. Pedestrian circulation. 1. The on-site pedestrian circulation system shall be continuous and connect the ground-level entrances of primary structure(s) to the following: a. Streets abutting the site; b. Common buildings such as laundry and recreation facilities; c. Parking areas; d. Shared open space and play areas; e. Abutting transit stops; and f. Any pedestrian amenity such as plazas, resting areas and viewpoints. As the building's ground level entries face Coral Street and property is zoned R-12, this criterion is not applicable. However, it is recommended that the walkway be connected to the future public sidewalk along Coral Street. 3. There shall be at least one pedestrian connection to an abutting street frontage for each 200 linear feet of street frontage. This is criterion is addressed in 2. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 16 OF 39 FINDING: This standard is met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. As this is a typical multi-family dwelling complex, and this is a permitted use in the R-12 zone, the above performance standards are met. The Neighborhood comments raised concerns about the potential odors, and noise from the trash recycling and requested that either the refuse area be moved to another location away from the Zimmerman's property to the east of the subject site, or that the refuse area be heavily screened. Screening of the refuse area is addressed under Section 18.745.050.E.4., and under Chapter 18.755 in this decision. The refuse area shall be located outside of the buffer area. FINDING: This standard has been not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 provides specific requirements for tree spacing including: Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Subsection 2 which includes the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree, small, medium or large. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility policies to maintain visual clearance; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT f'AGE 17 OF 39 The property has approximately 106.3 lineal feet of frontage along Coral Street, therefore, Section 18.745.040 is applicable, and street trees shall be planted along Coral Street. Deducting the estimated widths of the two accesses of 49 feet, there is 57 feet remaining of street frontage. Therefore, two large or medium size trees are required. The applicant has proposed to retain two existing Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) trees (one, 18-inch and one, 36-inch caliper tree) to satisfy the street tree requirement. The 36-inch Locust tree is located in about the center of the street frontage about 38 feet west of the access to the multi-family dwellings. The 18-inch Locust tree is located about 10 feet east of the existing driveway to the existing house. There is approximately 20 feet between the trunks of the Locust trees. The applicant has not rovided reference material confirming the tree size classification, and branching width at maturity or the Locust trees. On July 20, 2000 staff phone contacted the arborist, Walter Knapp, who stated that the branching width at maturity for the Locust trees is 30 feet. Therefore, the Locust trees would be considered medium sized trees, and the existing spacing does not meet the standard. FINDING: The criteria for street trees has been not been satisfied. If the condition below is satisfied, then the criteria will be met. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced, or add one (1) additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C, and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size, including tree height and branching width at maturity, and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.745.1 BUFFER MATRIX Single Units,Detached; Attached Single Units and Attached Single Units Manufactured Units Multifamily, 1-5 Units; and Multifamily,5+Units Duplexes EXISTING/ABUTTING USE Detached Single Units; Manufactured Units -- A C Attached Single Units and Multifamily, A -- B 1-5 Units,Duplexes Attached Single Units and Multifamily, A A -- 5+Units Mobile Home Parks A A B Commercial Zones(CC,CG,CP,CBD) C C C Neighborhood Commercial Zone(CN) C C C Mixed Use Employment Zone(MUE) C C C Light Industrial Zones(IP,IL) D D D Heavy Industrial Zone(IH) D D D Parking Lots C C C Arterial Streets A A A Note: See Table 18.745.2 for alternative combinations for meeting these screening requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 18 OF 39 TABLE 18.745.2 BUFFER COMBINATIONS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING [1] Oft alns, Width f Trees Shrubs 01.9;-91,1, • creentn new • • r linear feet of buffs A -- 10 -- Lawn/living -- 10 20'min/30'max spacing Lawn/living -- B groundcover 1 10 Shrubs 4' hedges C 2 8 15' min/30'max spacing Shrubs 5'fence 3 6 Shrubs 6'wall 1 20 Shrubs 6'hedge D 2 15 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'fence 3 10 Shrubs 6'wall 1 30 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'hedge or fence E 2 25 Shrubs 5'earthen berm or wall F -- 40 10' min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge,fence,wall or [1] Buffers are not required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street as specified in Section 18.745.050 A2. [2] Adjustments from these requirements can be obtained;see Section 18.370.020 C4. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. The Buffer Matrix Table 18.745.1 indicates that where the multi-family units (5+ units) abut detached single—family units to the north, east and west, the Buffer and Screening Standard is C. With a minimum five (5') foot fence, Standard C requires a buffer width of eight feet, and trees spaced between 15 to 30 feet apart. No buffer is required along the south property line as it abuts Coral Street. The applicant has proposed an eight (8) foot buffer with six-foot-high arborvitae along the majority of the north and east property lines , and an eight-foot buffer with three feet high arborvitae along the west property line. Seven (7) Maple trees are proposed to be planted in the buffer area with varied spacing, two (2" caliper) Flowering Plum trees are proposed to be retained along the west property, and two (20' caliper) Black Walnut trees are proposed to be retained to the west of the existing house. Tree spacing exceeds the 30-foot maximum at some locations. However, there are some locations where the buffer does not meet the standard as follows: 1. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit#2 encroaches into the buffer by one (1) foot. 2. A drop box is located in the buffer area along the east property line. 3. The water quality swale is located within the buffer area along the south end of the east property line for a length of 68 feet, and no landscape screening is proposed in this area. 4. The fencing and arborvitae proposed along the east and west property lines does not extend the full length of the east-west property lines. The screening and landscaping extends from the northeast and northwest corners of the site, along the east and west property lines, to points adjacent to the rear of existing garages on the abutting property. This is problematic particularly because a new water quality swale and parking lot are to be constructed along the southeastern portion of the site. 5. Tree spacing exceeds the 30-foot maximum at some locations within the buffer area. According to Section 18.745.050.B.2 a buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No building, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in the buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City. Buffering and Screening are addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 19 OF 39 Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4) foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years of planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table '18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has proposed a six (6') foot high fence for screening, however, the fence along the east property line is several feet over the property line and is owned by the abutting property owner. The fence is not proposed to screen the entire site and stops about 83 feet north of the southwest corner of the site, and about 59 feet north of the southeast corner of the site. As a consequence, the proposed water quality swale area and a portion of the parking lot would not be screened from view by the abutting property owners. Also, the property owners to the west of the site would be able to view the Proposed New Units at an angle looking northeast. Therefore, screening shall be continuous along the east, north and south perimeters of the site, and the applicant shall either provide the screening on his property or obtain an agreement with the abutting property owner's to the east regarding the use of the existing fence on their property for screening purposes. In any case, the applicant shall be fully responsible to the City of Tigard for the maintenance of the fence, and any agreement with the neighboring property owner shall contain language to that effect. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. FINDING: The Buffering and Screening standards are not met. However, the standards will be met if the following conditions are met: CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area, and the branching width at maturity. • The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east, north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit #2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. • The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5, or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of tax lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. • The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 20 OF 39 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant proposes to screen the parking lot with one (2" caliper) Flowering Plum tree. The proposed screening is inadequate. The applicant shall revise the site plan and add low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property and from property across Coral Street to the south. At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest portions of the parking lot. The applicant has not indicated any parking lot trees on the landscape plan. A minimum of two parking lot trees are required to be equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. FINDING: This standard has not been met as parking lot screening and landscaping, including parking lot trees, is insufficient to meet the standard. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property (and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parking lot. In addition, the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees (minimum 2"caliper at DBH) on the landscape plan, equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse and shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans indicate a drop box along the east property line. The applicant has not provided any information regarding proposed screening of the trash enclosure area as required. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18,755.050.C.3. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive Recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The Minimum standards method requires that Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 21 OF 39 Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional 5 square feet per unit for each unit above 10. The multi-family complex includes 4 new dwelling units. The applicant has proposed a trash enclosure of 30-35 square feet. However, the applicant has not specified the method of pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant has provided a faxed letter dated July 18, 2000 from Pride Disposal Company to provide refuse and recyclable collection. FINDING: This standard is not met as the applicant has not specified the method of pick-up and removal by haulers. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it is has selected, and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 This Chapter is applicable for development projects when there is new construction, expansion of existing use, or change of use in accordance with Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements. General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; Unless otherwise specified Access, Egress and Circulation criteria are addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and There is an existing 19-foot-wide driveway (11'-6" pavement width) to the west of the existing house which the applicant proposes to pave. The applicant proposes to pave the surface of the new access driveway along the southeast portion of the property. The applicant has not specified the material to be used for paving. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All parking spaces are served by a service drive, however, the service drive does not meet the minimum access drive width of 24 feet for two-way traffic, therefore, this standard is not met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 22 OF 39 Pedestrian Access: Section 18.705.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow- moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This standard is addressed primarily under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. The applicant shall provide a railing, or other approved barrier around the water quality swale area to prevent slow moving vehicles from escaping into this area, and to prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; The parking area is to be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The site plan indicates defined parking spaces via parking striping. Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has indicated wheel stops on all new parking spaces approximately one (1) foot back from the front of the parking stalls. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back form the front of the parking stall in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Lighting is addressed under Sections 18.705.030.F.4 and 18.360.090.A.10 in this decision. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. All sign changes and additions shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 23 OF 39 Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. From Figure 18.765.1 Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50%standard spaces, 50% compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. A Parking Angle • B Stall Width B C Stall Depth (no bumper overhang) E-{ D Aisle Width Between Stall Lines (5) F p E Stall Width Parallel to Aisle F Module Width (no bumper overhang) t T G Bumper Overhang The applicant has proposed all 90 degree parking spaces. All standard 90 degree parking spaces are required to be a minimum of 8'-5' wide by 18"-5" deep. The applicant is allowed up to 50% compact parking on the site which is required have minimum dimensions of 7'-5 wide x 16.5' deep. The proposed parking is 8'-0" wide by 15' deep with a one-foot overhang onto the five (5) wide sidewalk which does not meet the minimum required space dimensions for compact or standard spaces. In addition, the applicant has not provided the required one (1) van accessible parking space (nine feet wide) and aisle (eight feet wide adjacent to the passenger side). Accessible parking is addressed in more detail under Section 18.360.090.14 in this decision. The applicant is required to provide a 24-foot-wide access aisle in the parking lot. The proposed site shows two parking spaces blocking the 24-foot access aisle. As the applicant has proposed two more parking spaces than the required minimum for the site, these spaces can be eliminated, or replaced with one parking space oriented north-south, rather than east-west. FINDING: This standard has not been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the standard will be met: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G, Section 18.360.090.14, and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Building Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate the two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive, or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls, in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 24 OF 39 In accordance with Table 18.765.2, the minimum requirement for bicycle parking stalls in a multi-family development is 1.0/2 units. As there are four (4) new units, therefore, the minimum number of parking stalls required is two (2). The applicant proposes to locate four (4) covered parking stalls in front of Proposed Unit #2 which is within 50 feet of the primary entrances of Units #1, 2, and 3. The bicycle stalls are conveniently located adjacent to the five (5) foot sidewalk, and are not located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings, the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4, and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The Director may reduce the total required off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070.H by up to a total of 20% by means of parking adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5a. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-Street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MAXIMUM1'1 MINIMUM ZONE A I ZONE B I BICYCLE"] RESIDENTIAL Household Living Single Units,Attached See Multifamily(M) none(M) none(M) None Single Units, Detached 1.0/DU none(M) none(M) None Accessory Units 1.0/DU none none None Duplexes None Multifamily Units DU<500 sq ft: 1.0/DU(M) none(M) none(M) 1.0/2 DUs except elderly, 1 bedroom: 1.25/DU(M) which is 1.0/20 DUs 2 bedroom: 1.5/DU(M) 3 bedroom: 1.75/DU(M) The minimum number of parking spaces can be determined from TDC Table 18.765.2 above. There are four (4) proposed new two bedroom multi-family units and one existing single-family detached unit on the site. Minimum required parking is calculated by multiplying 1.5 parking spaces by 4 which equals 6 spaces. In addition, a minimum of one (1) parking space is required for the existing single-family dwelling. Therefore, the total number of required spaces is seven (7). A total of nine (9) parking spaces are proposed for the site, including eight (8) spaces in the parking lot, and one (1) separate space for the existing house. Four (4) of the parking spaces are proposed to covered via a four (4) stall carport. There is no maximum parking required for a multi-family complex. FINDING: This standard is met as the minimum parking requirement is met by the 9 proposed parking spaces for the site. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 Requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum the, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots g ts in accordance with Chapter 18.745. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 25 OF 39 As this is a residential development, no off-street loading is required. FINDING: This standard is met. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are 9 existing trees on the site according to the Tree Plan submitted by the applicant's arborist, Water Knapp. Eight of the nine trees will be retained. One hazardous 20" walnut tree with heart rot will be removed. The arborist has not submitted a numbered existing tree plan to clearly depict which trees will be retained, and the applicant's site plan does not exactly match the arborist data. However, clearly more than 75% percent of trees 12 inches or greater will be retained. The arborist has submitted a Tree Protection Plan. FINDING: This standard is met. However, to implement the tree protection plan the following conditions shall be satisfied: CONDITIONS: The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan, and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicant's arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly, and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all roperty adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The applicant has not shown a 30-foot visual clearance triangles on each side of the centerline of the accesses to the site on the site plan. However, it appears that the proposed project will meet the a visual clearance standards, however, this shall be confirmed by the applicant. The 30-foot visual clearance area contains no visual obstructions exceeding three feet in height. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance Chapter 18.795, and figure 18.795.1. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 26 OF 39 • C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: CHAPTER 18.360 Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standard is inapplicable No. 8. (100-year floodplain). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: • Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; There are 10 existing trees (and one 26" spruce just north of the site) on the site according to the Tree Plan submitted by the applicant's arborist, Water Knapp. Nine trees are proposed to be retained. One, 20" Black Walnut tree is considered hazardous by the arborist and is proposed for removal due to heart rot. The applicant has requested an Adjustment to reduce tree removal for the 42" conifer located in front of Proposed Unit #2 in this decision. The applicant has satisfied this criterion for preservation.of existing trees. The site slopes gently to the southeast where a water quality swale is proposed. The applicant does not propose to change the natural topography of the site, therefore, this criterion is met. • Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has stated that there is no ground slumping evident on the site. • Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation , and fire-fighting; and The closest locations of new dwellings to existing adjoining buildings are as follows: Proposed Unit #4 is proposed to be located a distance of 15 feet from the existing garage on the property to the west, and 15 feet and 3 inches north of the existing house on the same lot. Proposed Unit #3 is located about 68 feet from the existing attached garage on the property to the east. As Proposed Unit #4 meets the minimum ten (10') foot side setback requirement to the west, the proposed distance is adequate. • Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The new proposed dwelling units are oriented north-south with entries facing south toward Coral Street. Proposed Unit #4 is located a distance of 15'-3" behind and to the north of the existing house on the same lot. Proposed Unit #1 is located a distance of 26'-1" behind and to the nod of Proposed Unit #4. No information was provided by the applicant as to the height of the existing house, therefore, it is unclear to what extent the existing house on the subject lot may block sunlight to Proposed Unit #4. There was also no solar shadin g analysis provided regarding the potential solar shading of Proposed Unit #1 by Proposed Unit #4. Though staff is concerned about potential solar shading between the aforementioned, there does not appear to be solar shading issues that would be caused by the proposed new construction to adjoining property. The site design of the new units is oriented with consideration for protection from southwesterly winds, as the units are clustered close together and behind existing buildings. Also, Proposed Unit #4 will provide wind protection to the other new units as it is located just southwest of the other new units. As the rear of the new units face north, the buildings are reasonable oriented for protection from northwesterly winds. FINDING: These criteria are met with the exception of adequate fire access radius as per the Building Division comments contained in this decision. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 27 OF 39 CONDITION:Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius, and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Tree removal and preservation is addressed under Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is met. Exterior Elevations: Section 18.360.090.A.3 Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: 1) Recesses, e.g. decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet. 2 Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and 3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Dwelling units are 30 feet wide, therefore, any common features shown on the units are at a minimum interval of 30 feet. Each new dwelling unit is proposed to have a patio extension of ten (10') feet. Each new dwelling unit is proposed to have a gabled-roof dormer with the height of dormer approximately 3'-9" at the midpoint of the gable. FINDING: This standard is met. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: • The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The purpose of the buffer is to provide a visual barrier and allow for light and air circulation between the proposed buildings and adjacent single-family use. The Buffering and Screening standards in this section are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. Screening standards in this Section are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 28 OF 39 Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: Section 18.360.090.5 a. Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a below; b. The buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise; c. On-site uses which create noise, light, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses; and d. Buffers shall be placed on the site as necessary to mitigate noise, light or glare from off-site sources. Private outdoor patios ten (10') foot x (10') foot, are provided for each multi-family dwelling unit. It is unclear what the applicant is proposing for screening for these patio areas. Of particular concern with regards to privacy and noise is Proposed Unit #4's patio location which is adjacent to the front entrance to Proposed Unit #1. All of the private outdoor spaces are on the north sides of the buildings and, therefore, are not well oriented for sunlight. Buffering is addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standards, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and p rovide screening in the form of a minimum five (5') foot high wooden fencing, and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun, for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: Section 18.360.090.A.6 a. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and (1) Balconies used for entrances or exits shall not be considered as open space except where such exits or entrances are for the sole use of the unit; and (2) Required open space may include roofed or enclosed structures such as a recreation center or covered picnic area. b. Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and c. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. This standard is addressed together with Section 18.360.090.A.5 above in this decision. FINDING:This standard is not met. See condition under Section 18.360.090.A.5 above. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: Section 18.360.090.A.7 a. In addition to the requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: (1) Studio up to and including two-bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and (2) Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. b. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 29 OF 39 (1) It may be all outdoor space; or (2) It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court, and indoor recreation room; or (3) It may be all public or common space; or (4) It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; and (5) Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. A minimum of 200 square feet per unit for two bedroom units is required. Shared outdoor space shall also be provided for the existing house as it is part of the multi-family complex, though the number of bedrooms for this dwelling was not provided. Assuming all units to be two-bedroom, the minimum requirement for shared outdoor space would be 1000 square feet. The applicant has stated in his letter of February 18, 2000, that there is 1,000 square feet of shared outdoor space shown on the plans along the front of the three attached units. The shared outdoor recreational space is all outdoor space. Staff calculated approximately 700 square feet of usable outdoor recreational space in this area (bark-dust/landscaped areas do not qualify as usable recreational space). Therefore, this criteria is not met. c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; The shared outdoor recreational space is readily observable to promote crime prevention as the windows from each unit face directly onto the patios. It is recommended that a split rail fence be used for screening where possible to further promote crime prevention. FINDING: This standard is not met as the area proposed for shared outdoor recreation has only approximately 700 square feet of usable outdoor recreational space, which is below the minimum required for the number of units and number of bedrooms per unit on this site. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house, and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom, the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. Private outdoor areas are defined by patios at the rear of each new dwelling unit. The parking lot which fronts Coral Street is a semi-private area, however, it may invite crime due to a lack of lighting, and openness to the street. Also the area between Proposed Unit #4 and #1 is a "indefensible space", vulnerable to crime, due to lack of lighting and visibility. Lighting is addressed under Section 18.765.040.L and Section 18.360.090.A.10 below. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criteria, the following condition shall be met: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas, semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention, and to establish maintenance responsibility in accordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 30 OF 39 Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes be located to liprevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior ghting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located on the front and rear elevations of the new units. Mailboxes are located at the street frontage in front of the subject site. The trash enclosure is located on the central eastern edge of the site along the parking lot (however, it shall be moved from this location in the buffer area). Interior laundry service area is not indicated in the plans. The Police Department has provided comments with regard to lighting for the site. Proposed wall mounted lighting on the individual units is not adequate for crime prevention and safety. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to satisfy this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime lprevention between Proposed Units #t� and #1, and in the parking lot at lighting evels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends `ground type lighting between Units #1 and #4, and some additional lighting for the roposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or roposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (11) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site fronts Coral Street which is a local street. The closest access to public transit is off of Greenburg Road to the immediate west of Coral Street. FINDING: As the site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route, no transit facilities are required. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 6 and 7 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and a minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The minimum landscape percentage is addressed under Chapter 18.510 in this decision, and exceeds the minimum landscape gross area for landscaping required. FINDING: This standard is met. Drainage: Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This criterion is addressed under Street and Utility Improvements, Section 18.810.100.A and D in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 31 OF 39 Provision for the disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. The requirement for accessible parking spaces for parking lots between 1-25 parking spaces is 1 accessible parking space. Accessible parking spaces shall be at least nine feet wide and shall have an adjacent access aisle, located on the passenger side that is at least six feet wide (except that two adjacent accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle). In addition, one in every eight accessible spaces, but not less than one shall be van accessible which is at least nine feet wide with an adjacent access aisle of at least eight feet wide. The applicant proposes no accessible stalls. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following conditions: CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. • Prior to final building inspection, a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. D. VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS: CHAPTER 18.370 Type I Adjustment: Section 18.370.020.C.7 Adjustments to setbacks to reduce tree removal (Chapter 18.790). By means of a Type procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, the Director may grant a modification from applicable setback requirements of this Code for the purpose of preserving a tree or trees on the site of proposed development. Such modification may reduce the required setback by up to 50%, but shall not be more than is necessary for the preservation of trees on the site. The setback modification described in this section shall supersede any special setback requirements or exceptions set out elsewhere in this title, including but not limited to Chapter 18.730, except Section 18.730.040. The applicant has requested a rear yard (north) setback reduction from 20 feet to either 10 or 16 feet, and a side yard setback reduction from ten (10') feet to eight (8') feet (at Proposed Unit #1 only). These setback reductions are requested to reduce tree removal on the subject site. Specifically, the applicant proposes to preserve a 42" Conifer located in front of Proposed Unit #2 in a recessed area cut into the building footprint design. This request is consistent with the approval criteria for Site Development Review in Section 18.360.090.A.2. which requires that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, and that trees shall be preserve to the extent possible. Granting this request is also consistent with Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant also proposes to preserve eight of the nine trees located on the site. The one tree shown not to be preserved is a 10" Black Walnut located on the north property line. A setback reduction to 16 feet is a reasonable compromise to preserve the large Conifer, and yet provide adequate setback and buffering between this property and the property to the north. The north property line abuts the rear yard of an existing single-family residence located roughly 100 feet north and zoned R-12. A ten (10') foot setback in the rear yard is problematic because the concrete patio attached to Unit #2 would then only be one-foot from the property line, providing virtually no buffer area. Even as proposed on the plans currently with a 16-foot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 32 OF 39 setback in the rear yard, the patio encroaches one-foot into the eight (8') foot buffer area. The patio satisfies the requirement for private outdoor space under Section 18.360.090.A.6. However, a 10-foot setback in the rear would allow only a two foot deep patio with an eight (8) foot buffer area. If greater space is need for the tree, the recess in the unit itself could be widened and designed around the tree. The west side yard setback reduction to eight (8') feet is justified only adjacent to Proposed Unit #1 to preserve the 42" Conifer tree. The setback reduction is adjacent to the rear yard of an existing single-family residence zoned R-12. There are no windows proposed for the west elevation of Proposed Unit #1, so privacy will be preserved for the adjacent property owner. The property owner to the west has objected to the granting of the adjustment. FINDING: The standard is met for a 20% reduction from 20 to 16 feet in the rear yard setback, but not for a 50% reduction. The standard is also met for a 20% reduction in the west side yard setback from 10 to eight (8') feet only adjacent to Proposed Unit#1. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant submitted a brief impact study. The following excerpt is taken from the applicant's study: NOISE IMPACT: The property is zoned R-12. The 20-40 Plan will increase the R-12 zoned area in this location. The downhill neighbor to the East would like to see (2) trees added and 6' arborvitae @ 2'-6" o/c used to help buffer noise and privacy. The neighbor to the North did not show up at the neighborhood meeting. The neighbor to the West, Mrs. Hanson, does not object to the proposal as I personally stopped and visited her. I am proposing an upscale two- bedroom unit in hope of attracting professional and mature tenants. The interview and selection of tenants should also help in controlling noise; since noise is more of behavioral thing in bedroom communities. Noise will be mitigated and the impact very minimal due to the size and nature of the development. PARKS SYSTEMS: The property, when fully occupied should add about eleven people to a population of 37,000. This is not a negative impact in any way. Besides a positive impact will be the systems development fee charged for this project which will benefit the public. WATER SYSTEM: Coral Street has a 6" dia. main and no improvements are necessary. The entire TVWD Metzger Division operates at approximately 3 million gallons per day in the winter and about 6 million gallons per day in the summer. The existing dwelling consumes an average of 200 to 250 gallons per day, which is a good indication of the consumption for each of the other 4 units. The water comes from Bull Run and is purchased from the Portland Water Bureau. Obviously supply, demand and added infrastructure set the price of water which is shared by all. SEWER SYSTEM: Coral Street has an 8" dia. sewer line running towards the east. There will be a hook-up charge, which is used for future improvements and a monthly bill for services. The hook-up fees mitigate the impact and 4 units into an 8" dia. line is not a problem and no improvements are necessary. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: This site imperious area of 11,115 sq. ft. will be connected to an onsite detention basin. The outflow and overflow will be connected to a 12" CSP, which heads east on Coral Street. The area is very small compared to the overall drainage basin however, the detention basin will mitigate peak flow for this site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 33 OF 39 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: Regarding bikeways — Coral Street is a small residential access street; however, the street has a 60' right-of-way. Just 516' to the west is Greenburg Road where bikeways exist. Regarding traffic, the existing dwelling normally has 1 vehicle in the driveway; per the parking standard six vehicles would exist for the four new units for a total of seven vehicles. With 1 to 2 round trips per day on a 60' right-of-way street normally headed west 516 feet to Greenburg Road a major arterial. Thus, the traffic will pass by only three residents. This is very little traffic distance and impact to the neighborhood and with Coral Street paved approximately 34' wide the street is adequate to carry the additional traffic adequately. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $213 divided by .32 equals $665.6 ($213 is the residential use trip rate per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective July 1, 2000). According to the ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, this use would best be classified as low-rise apartment for the new dwelling units which generates 6.60 average weekday trips per dwelling unit per day. As there are four (4) new dwelling units proposed, 26.4 trips are generated per average weekday. For the existing single-family detached house, the weekday trip rate is 10. Therefore, the total number of trips generated for this development is 36.4 vehicle trips per day. Credits for mitigated costs The applicant is required to construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The frontage is approximately 106 feet in length. Coral Street is a local street and all of the main utilities are in. Therefore, it is estimated that the cost of the half-street improvement is about $150 per lineal foot ($150 x 106), or roughly $15,900. The applicant is entitled to a credit for the cost of the half-street improvement. Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts Full Impact $36.4 x 665.6= $24,228 Less TIF Assessment $36.4 x $213= $7,753 Less Cost of Improvements $150 x 106= 15,900 Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts $575 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts are roughly equivalent to the full impact (though numerically slightly less), therefore, the conditions imposed are roughly proportional and justified. G. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 34 OF 39 Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Coral Street, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW on this street, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Coral Street is currently paved, but not fully improved to meet City standards. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement as a part of their project. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvements on SW Coral Street, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Coral Street that has capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will serve all buildings on the site from one 4-inch sewer service lateral. This concept is acceptable to Staff. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This plan will accommodate any upstream runoff that flows toward and/or through this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 35 OF 39 including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide onsite detention via a vegetated swale. The applicant provided preliminary calculations of the detention volume needed. The onsite swale will have sufficient capacity for detention. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. A bikeway is located along Greenburg Road, just west of Coral Street and within close proximity to this site. No additional bikeways are identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan. Therefore, no additional bikeway extension is required for this development. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 36 OF 39 would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 106 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,915.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service boundary. There is an existing public water line located in SW Coral Street that can sufficiently serve this site. The existing house on the site is already served. Prior to construction, the applicant must obtain final plan approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan and narrative show that the onsite swale will also function for treatment of the storm water. This concept is acceptable to Staff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan is required to be a part of the public improvement plan submittal to the Engineering Department. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 37 OF 39 For multi-tenant buildings and projects, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this project will contain one multi-tenant building with three units and one new detached single-family unit, in addition to the existing single-family detached house. For this project, the addressing fee will be $120.00 (4 new units X $30/address = $120.00). SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long-Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. May require two hydrants. 2. Doesn't comply with Fire Dept access radius, 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1. The plans proposed no lighting schemes. Noted on a response dated February 25, 2000 indicates "sufficient lights will be attached to the units for visual awareness at dark." This office needs clarification of lighting methods. Is this lighting purely at the discretion of the rental unit? 2. On 7/24/2000 further comments were received as follows: Recommend "ground type lighting between Units #1 and #1, and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained. City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1 . This is within the Tualatin Valley Water District. 2. Although the water quality swale is private it is recommended that a 1/2" orifice be used and a larger pipe from 12' C.B. to drain inlet, instead of %2" diameter. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed this application and provided comments which are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.810 in this decision. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. Tri-Met was notified but no comments were provided. Unified Sewerage Agency was notified but no comments were provided. US West Communications has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. Tigard-Tualatin School District#23J was notified but no comments were provided. GTE was notified but no comments were provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 38 OF 39 PGE was notified but no comments were provided. NW Natural Gas was notified but no comments were provided. ICI Cable was notified but no comments were provided. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 28, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 12, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. . Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 11, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. C?-. 4' U / 64 July 28, 2000 PR PARED BY: Karen Perl Fox DATE Associate Planner Vii July 28, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd' 1 DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\karen\sd r\sdr00-3dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 39 OF 39 x ,., -0 z.,-,• ° tall -'-±------.- 3•70-2/79 9.191X3 a lir _ • 4.9 41 rt 1=4 •.11.1.0 1 < A ius "ICI ‘ \ , \ I I .L900I opaal .09. .....i.,11.4 tsar*, ..7.-, 1 , 02 \ I .\NI a.24 , ;Arad oasixa 4. \ ea .L101 WI t•t ,, I / 11 .C-.91 11 •- •• I 141' , .1•.9L i k m ill 2,,, . \ Z1134. ,, , r N- ,3_____ 1 1 . 1 !,i viiv.d . . .... VIIII I. 1 s \ 0.. r,;.-■ Ns, I I \ 1 ASel 1 •'4A J.A • 199 009 I 1 K 1 1 I IIIII • 0 A j I q$. I I I iii I r.iiNn C1360.:6021d 11 I 4 \I 1 1 4 i .0601•'ii Li 179 006 I.LIM 0390elatid I q9 I: 1 .L9101• di '49,136 1 1.---0 ■1 I 2 11\ \ 1,1 1 \ •; I\ 39r1OH 9.1.91X3 1 1 I 1 i 11 • II, \ I • I\ yt i IL I .6"424. 1.•/' 1 '') )1:10 I I 9g : t. ti 1 • I • t• ' •1•----,,,•,__.m4v4v-k. _./. ..0igta;- rd ..1.--.....v •. I/ 1 1 \ II ..CI----------------------, .07.9- • . .1; It 75 .) r 1 . . . A.-., ,.. ' \ ,-.° '----0- !--\- I / i 5-'-' .. + • I . : .... aa,3,161-73 g ino Z (4..11,0•11,20111.I1 lc___. ..._K.\,L9•901 I : II I, 1 CO * (•1 I .Iri --7.6-Z-7-- 11, 9V9 U! .---;i--- blai'VM m-4 .41.1 911P4/1 it.--' ...,...% .• ,, ...• . 13 % •• 9.9 11 ‘ , . 1 1 ;NA• 34 • It i' 0 1 RI 1 r,3 01 4..'N 2: v! .. . . • • it. ...1 cr)e, : 1 2.Iwo C1390.409171 111 li .01' %.1.....1 16] AO ,t I „," \ r \ 13) e ..!•. 1: I OLLVal 1 Z M+ i • 0-I '9 4 + .: i •.- tt• ta ‘J! .. : i II • 0 1 II ; 2 \ • I. so----.=-.1==.----%F..=,-■ r ■ A : •01....(24 ir. J1 • • 1 OW I 0 OF WI 8 , 2 0 6 01.. +g., I mrn in 0 ix - \ 1!■ \ •. . \ ...., 1 t OtrOal -% ' "2," t., _ 1 \\ . NO•J(?) 6-I 0 In \tst...-2_, .......---,-......4 : .0vtazi• E-1-TsKr- 4. 0 M ' 2 r-11:'• • Aptam 2 I...; L \...-..._ , 4 N I •n • 1.: ..1 I .....".. Zr, N. ''''. / -.0 ••• - /.0...j. < %6.f \ 9d373 4219 9 Sr- 9 • • I 4 1 .17A,:24,1 11 1 CP I ,C..._._.. \\:1;\ Nil Clivanti.ctairtp- f ?...1.1t41 C1390.4024/ VI r ; C=1 li .tV913A1bC1 • I , 039041103W ', e I I 11 i■ 1 I 1 ! ! I N ." I 04.9 x P.9 x 9.1./ •r t:. •0-.0z N .106 ) Barna-Iowa ,i: / HSralli. li. I -( tac11) q .51.101 3 © .a,oc ■ a i to 19/t• N. r•\ X0,2 'OE CA CC ,E 1 al 9D.473-10 %-- 4 101130 339 .iCtict ! 0 0 • ..) rrl CD n 0 - 390314 '''• .L41001 - 3II., dii-I Z 0 11?- ern.2111N t J(nh.t.I-' *--.1:;Pz3-------*- 30N341 COOT f19114.9'9.191X3 LA.! aso CN3.1.X3 t1•1tC2 7:1 ----- '''''1- 9.191X3 q 1 , 73 < o 0 7:' 74 •,- = -i IT NJ i r 1 c) -1 o -0, 39421'09 v.isixa i / C ----k-- C) 0 Q 03 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION p j • s i UILJ CITY of TIGARD IV =I ii 84 VICINITY MAP kr� I . SDR2000 00003 I a VAR2000-00008 .4 IS 1111111� � ; �� � RASMUSSEN EWA iI PROJECT VIII - Ni i 7 ST rii" i- BORDERS ST I 111111111 ■ LEHMANN ST / liii.clomIlllem • CORAL ST o 100 200 300 400 500 Feel 1111 -.361 1881 City of Tigard LOCUST ST , • i ` L —i Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. —�Q 13125 SW Hall Blvd (Nn Tigard,OR 97223 1 (L' (503)639.4171 r�W hgpJMvnv.ci.9gard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 41*,„ RASMUSSEN PROJECT ' CITY OF TIGARD Community Deveropmet SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00003, shaping� tterCommun l� ity VARIANCE (VAR) 2000-00008 120 DAYS =9/21/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT CASE NOS. Site Development Review (SDR) Type II SDR2000-00003 Variance (VAR) Type I Adjustment VAR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following: 1 . New construction of a tri-plex and one detached unit in a multi-family complex on a lot with one existing detached single-family house. 2. A Type I Adjustment to the north and west setbacks to reduce tree removal. APPLICANT: Kenneth A. Rasmussen OWNERS: Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Ct. 603 Larkspur Ct. Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Sublimity, Oregon 97385 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3, 050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1 S126DC, Tax Lot 3700. The project is on the west side of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92nd Avenue. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review is approved subject to certain conditions. A request for Type I Adjustment for a reduction to the rear yard setback to 16 feet, and the west side yard setback to eight feet to reduce tree removal, is APPROVED subject to certain conditions. The request to further reduce the rear yard setback to 10 feet is DENIED. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 28, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 12, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST II, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Perl Fox at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125-SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. r ..� PA I.-:r — ii q i 1 1 I h. F I� `id I0 Ll C Z i '�I ' 3 Q iI QQli Q_ tr„... ........–r, lilt ..,,. �_ _ _ C I i ,-..._.._ Q cc � : ? '1 i I- •- 1 i NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIE, .LDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY TY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: June 2, 2000 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR)2000-00003 VARIANCE (VAR)2000-00008 FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 16, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 14, 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the .sis for an appeal to the Tigard Plat ig Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I r� 1v7 R VICINITY MAP 1111 , SDR2000-00003 OE' elm VAR2000-00008 . I 1 111.1111 rte`;:Mil'� � RASMUSSEN I ■U_ —', '�I�I '�, PROJECT i!! ' . iii _ 11� ■ „11■•I a-1 it {.r� III =111111 �J. mws∎••It 111 i : r - I III 11 _ ' ____FF-17.-1 -1 .4t, — o_ . 1----A-7-i ilvi7:7 \1 –. -1- 1 kg—J.: A:c iOOO;C NUVKwr c.CO3 APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • J June 8, 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING Planning Divison JUN 1 4 2000 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, Or 97223 Attn: Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner Subject: Rasmussen Project File Nos. (SDR)2000-00003 —(VAR)2000-00008 My name is Larry Zimmerman. My wife and I own property at 9335 S.W. Coral St, which abuts the Rasmussen property to the east. Even though our property is zoned R-12,our home is and will continue to be into the foreseeable future, a single family residential dwelling. We would hope therefore it might be entitled to the same considerations that would prevail if the home were similarly located in a zone of lesser density. In his application, Mr. Rasmussen declares he will meet the requirements of 18.745 by using, along with landscaping, an existing 6' fence on his east lot line. It is noteworthy the mentioned fence is, at the south east corner, approximately 4 feet east of Mr. Rasmussen's east lot line, angling northward to a point approximately 1 foot east of his lot line at the northeast corner. Flagged stakes now mark these corners. If the existing fence is judged to be the screen for the east lot line, it becomes essentially Mr. Rasmussen's fence... while upkeep would remain the responsibility of the Zimmermans. We note the location of tenant dwellings will place them at a point 10 feet more or less above the Zimmerman's rear windows. A person standing at or in the front of the proposed tenant dwellings would have clear line of sight into our family room, kitchen, dining room, back yard and patio area. Mr Rasmussen's application seems to suggest sufficient screen exists on our property to accommodate requirements of this section. There is no such qualifying vegetation. Additional screening would appropriate under 18.745.050 (B-7). We note further the location of the rubbish collection area immediately outside our west side fence, approximately 20 feet from our patio. The only screening from this area appears to be the 6' fence mentioned above. There does not seem to be protection from odors usually emanating from rubbish collection areas or from the noises usually associated with them. We are concerned about drainage and run off control. A very high water table exists in our neighborhood. During the wet winter months, our property and those to the east collect significant down hill seepage from the higher properties to the north and to the east . The Rasmussen Project will affect this movement of water. 11 QS cia 1N1`7Ir3 94 Ism `"lr'hd_4 tYss,g,103 j I� 5p ff "1/ rn.ni 7/ ?W }- nr)r --,c <1 4-0(1) rrn-D-'1 �P55OWP99 It appears that what was ground water, or seepage, will now be run off because of the impervious surfaces created by the project. The current volume of water running in the culvert/ditch drainage system already causes down stream flooding each year. The impact of additional volume from impervious surface run off would be significant and is of concern to the down stream neighborhood. The proposed detention system will do little to alleviate this condition in the long term. The following requests seem therefore appropriate. 1. That Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and directed to construct a solid 8' fence sight screen inside his property line 2. That Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and be required to provide a noise/sound screen of Arborvitae, 8' at planting, on not less than 36"centers, and two trees of suitable height to immediately screen direct line of sight into the rearward areas of our home. 3. That the rubbish container area be moved to another location or heavily screened and covered to avoid odor and noise pollution of our back yard. 4. That Mr. Rasmussen be required to upgrade the existing culvert water drainage system eastward to 90`h Street to accommodate the additional water run off created by the impervious surfaces. We have reviewed Mr. Rasmussen's application documents. We have found significant differences between comments we made at the neighborhood meeting and those ascribed to us in the application documents. This letter then will correct any errors or omissions. None of these remarks should be taken as opposition to this project or any project of its kind. However privacy and continued livability surely deserve consideration as the decision process moves forward. Mr. and Mrs. Michael Fisher, of 9255 S.W. Coral St, Tigard, are down stream neighbors who share our apprehensions about the impending drainage and run off problems that will be caused by the Rasumussen Project. They join with us in submitting these comments. Yo ruly arry a , D• a Zimmerman 9335 S. W. Coral St. Tigard, OR 97223 Michael and Randy Fisher 9255 S.W. Coral St. Tigard Or 97223 ./1%ie-e, 17-a-eV June Hansen 9395 SW Coral Portland OR 97223 RECEIVED PLANNING JUN 1 5 2000 To: Karen Pere Fox, Assoc. Planner CITY OF TIGARD Planning Division, city of Tigard From: June Hansen, resident 9395 SW Coral Date: June 13, 2000 RE: Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003 VAR 2000-00008 The purpose of this letter is to state my opposition to the site development and granting of a variance for the Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003 and VAR 2000-00008. As the closest neighbor to this project, my objections are based on Tigard Code, Chapter 18.360.010, Purpose, General Purpose 3. "To maintain and improve the qualities of and relationship between individual buildings, structures and the physical developments which best contribute to the amenities and attractiveness of the area or neighborhood." The Rasmussen Project does not meet this test. The types of structures to be built are not similar to others in the neighborhood. Nor will this development be similar to other new development occurring as part of the Washington Square Town Center. This project does not relate to the single family homes that surround it, it is not compatible with the rowhouses close by, and it will not match higher density housing that is planned in the future. I also object to any variance of the west side set back requirements. The applicant has failed to meet all the criteria under 18.360.90. He has met (1) "Preservation of existing trees", at the expense of (3) "Location to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, circulation and firefighting." Any variance for the Rasmussen Project will have a critical impact on any plans for redevelopment of my property, directly adjoining. While not in the criteria, a real concern with the project is the treatment of the trees. They are massive firs, over 100 years old. Firs have shallow roots, that may be disturbed by the on-going development of the project. I question the efforts made to safeguard the trees from construction damage and to prevent them from falling on the structures, after the construction. Review of this project by an arborist is warranted. Thank you for your consideration. June Hansen 1Z 9 3 7 5 s� Mr &cial, 14- :9a/nn ore-cad- _ , ' i 1760-e-e-11/1/1-f, VYl/e& fj114- —66 Gum 7 "/ C///(//,l, (�J 54_e,„ 4„, . 1 • / 3 95 e-6- � �� 3 % MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 5, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2000-00003, Rasmussen Four-Plex Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and 34- foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Coral Street, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW on this street, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Coral Street is currently paved, but not fully improved to meet City standards. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement as a part of their project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-flex PAGE 1 Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvements on SW Coral Street, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Coral Street that has capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will serve all buildings on the site from one 4-inch sewer service lateral. This concept is acceptable to Staff. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). It appears this plan will accommodate any upstream runoff that flows toward and/or through this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 2 Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide onsite detention via a vegetated swale. The applicant provided preliminary calculations of the detention volume needed. It appears the onsite swale will have sufficient capacity for detention. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 3 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 106 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,915.00. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 4 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service boundary. There is an existing public water line located in SW Coral Street that can sufficiently serve this site. The existing house on the site is already served. Prior to construction, the applicant must obtain final plan approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan and narrative show that the onsite swale will also function for treatment of the storm water. This concept is acceptable to Staff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 5 erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan is required to be a part of the public improvement plan submittal to the Engineering Department. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings and projects, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this project will contain one multi-tenant building with three units and one new detached single-family unit, in addition to the existing single-family detached house. For this project, the addressing fee will be $120.00 (4 new units X $30/address = $120.00). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 6 • As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$120.00. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Coral Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local commercial industrial street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Coral Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. A profile of SW Coral Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall show all work in the public right-of-way, including the sanitary sewer tap, water service tap(s) and storm drainage work. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 7 submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection(s). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,915.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 8 To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 1 1t1g3331usr\depts\englbnanr\com mentslsdr\sdr2000-00003.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00003 Rasmussen Four-Plex PAGE 9 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C�T�OF TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division ✓UN 0 5 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x3151 Ey Phone: (5031630-4171/Fax: 15031 604-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SOR)2000-00003/VARIANCE(VARI 2000-00008 >. RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (I'1 ase provide the following information)Name of Persons]Commenting: < L )1 I Phone Number(s): - 25,<, l f f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY RECEIVED PLANNING MEMORANDUM JUN 16 2000 CITY OF TICARD DATE: June 13, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA J SUBJECT: Rasmussen Project, SDR 2000-00003, VAR 2000-00008 On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. SANITARY SEWER Each lot in the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. • The impervious surface from the triplex needs to be treated in the water quality swale. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development S(taping A Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUN 0 5 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner[x3151 CINCFT►CARD Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00003/VARIANCE(VAR)2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: -chR c c'c ��°�°'& ho \,j•\" Sc)ealmt y . t'0\ea, on Cis 4 e5Q0n(4., , AGk e r-e,1/4) e S , 00 v KG\e5 ' COA c k5 W.\\ hl atacc d NitA. vn,6 -eV v16Jak coYA cw•42s6 o'c dkar\c,, " 1\k\y Ok-c i\sa6 cko.4\Acok+an OF \5VA-thq V\NI 0d5 \5 34"<2 \Ihkkh v1 t at: 41, d\W,Q'c" * i em co\ vn�k• •i1 — R�.comvvikk �wnd� -Fyn \�o)h�vh h�k� �,\� l ands . Some otkc∎ real +- a eoa*� a,ttck Goo1, \Awl \k o�cc Ab\k, `-' tr.1n�r� 100*IQ* 0\rh Q�'C �tDA d. (cleease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Numher[sl: 4,-- *1019 ex- ��o JUN-07 00 10:17 FROM:FRC FAX. 15035914484 TO:Fn3 684 7297 PAGE:01/02 A !; 1211, Jan Youngquist • Demographic Specialist � Beaverton School District G :4) 16550 SW Merl° Road, Beaverton OR 97006 '`=2.. o,,% 5031591-4319 • Fax: 503/591-4484 Fax Cover Sheet To; Karen Perl Fox Company: City of Tigard Phone: 639-4171 Fax: 684-7297 coats: June 7, 2000 Pages: 2 • Comments: Karen— Attached please find our response to your request for comments on the Rasmussen Project. It is not within the Beaverton School District boundaries. Joy-Gay Pahl is retiring—I am taking her position Please have your office send all future requests and information to my attention. Thanks for your help. Jan Youngquist JUN-07 00 10: 17 FROM:FAC FAX. 15035914484 TO:503 684 7297 PAGE:02'02 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF T'GARD (;vmmut,ity(Devcfoprtent Shaping 14(Better Community lATE: lune 2,2000 TO: loy-Gall Pafil,Beaverton School District#40 Demographics&Planning Department FROM: CI el Ti s on STAFF CONTACT: Karen Pen Fox.Associate Pioneer 113151 Phone: (5081880-41711 Fax: 150318847201 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 2000-00003/VARIAIICE IVARI 2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan.Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review, From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR_COMMENTS BACK BY 11INE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. n YOU are hit the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: pW0122z1 ! �O 0./t NJ 114 6Preuse pru cfc the following in formation)Name of Persontsl Commenting: J wN 625u) I Phone Numfertsl: 5°~ { — l}3 (q REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner 1x3151 Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00003/VARIANCE[VARI 2000-00008 - RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 2-1 -1-)0'&-;.^I 64)eri{ Fi/q tr'¢S 4,7,ac /lo i 4c' (4'lease provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 4(-2SK, Phone Number(s): 3�y R-4.1'-1. moots OCIRIMr.r MENU' a 12K3' C •a. •r r r r r L r., rill■In A q it :I a i I I rI 1 I O te �v,�. ■ 111.1.1.../N■1111 V= ti lEttai _ _ _ 1 o• ...iel I I J• Fes' /AV �,� lj, [ • ..41 'F W/ 7 L .. 1 ) , J u i 1.- I .... . .. ..... omi ) CL __ I 4 . Q I I - y3 i ; lk_ MM LL. a .. r 1 1 i is .... - . 1...,--- utin. i _/7.-g rii. --,,- 0 lit 1 .r- . -Tici-,., !ji -T v , M15Vv, • •4% MS wort�4. f8 .� i�1 � \—TE OM.G..,UC I a.. l Aoruu r Ao4r heT1eT ream 111 r SW CORAL STREET °u`CORAL S_ il-_ Cliv TIG + SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 OF TIGARD SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map is not to scale) _ H ...'1 CITY of TIGARD U) ��� "—el-) �� �� OEOORwtrN IC IN FOR YwTION SvBTEu iihill Ii .VICINITY MAP WM o , `E ST ST ,1.�o _;a � Y�, I e SDR2000-00003 MII gia.17111111 Ili VAR2000-00008 ��j NE RASMUSSEN ' �I °° PROJECT �i\_ra f- ftST Mu, MI / ■ BORDERS ST 7 gIMIN i LEHMANN ■ SITE —{} = ST 1 `` • Z • Z N cv 1 / 1 CORAL ST o loo 200 300 400 500 Feet Iii I 1 I 1••31,1 feet I( - -. A dj, I'i'i A . LOCUST IP City of Tigard / ST \� \ Information on this map is for general location only and I shoultl be verified v.+th the Development Services Division. O 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 r Aw .ci tig 171 \ IHtpJMrww.ci.lipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 4161', REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 TO: Nadine Smith,Advanced Planning Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner[x315) Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE[VAR)2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease prarnde the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number(sl: • ! Qom itt,to J O gP' tY rnkA 0 101.!' •4 w 4r.. Ala al. •. f ?L ra3 • N iIiiii q �I ,, :._ . �( o ,. I l� Z c.,) is ° i I ... ... 1:: . j..4 a,v r-v it �,,.� it, �. 7 1 i V. L 1 . if 5,....5t.;_ ce 0 _1 1 z- u i 1,, I ......- .. Mt N. all 4 1 A.E _ I -.. e. 11171M. 34,-; a .. LL r'. ...--" 3 I 0 ..I 2 1 i —,1/4--. 0 1.____ f:.___...__— — • 41/4 .. _0'4 1 ›— .:fl ' N • �.,:: ii, li r.G.•PO 4 o.. l MIS 01044•M 4 4 %--- II Mali 1lA1). NI el) SW CORAL STREET saC.CR LBT. (lfle7-411 ) CITY OF TIG AR SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 1 SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT ! (Map is not to scale) gillgliWvIriV r 0■41,41 84,0 i ee0e11�CITY IY oOe f YT�TIIGOe As RD VICINITY MAP ,a 11111 CED_. REST ST It° SDR2000-00003 i > i ■ V 82000-00008 am 11 re IrnAI1P1 ■ r�I ��� RASMUSSEN : 2.am �,/ PROJECT iN ST 91Irlili ■ BORDERS ST I NIIIII ■ ■ LEHMANN ST III1Ir; IiIINx I.1llLn. N• I 1 CORAL ST 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet MI ■ I I T ' � � _, r=3e1 rest iiiiiiiiU I .�> ±4,Ciry of Tigard LOCUST �� Infortnallon on this map is for general location only and . _(r �� e11nWd la verified with the Development Services Dwision ■ 73(50 )6 Hall Blvd ■• Tigard,OR 97223 s (503)639.4171 liAll all. _ IP h1tp://VN.W.CI.IIQerd.df.11e Plot date:dun 1,2000;C:,magicWtAGIC03.APR Community Development 1 —z----- o n g __ COPYRIGHT 1999 �l6n ilefe 33xrso _ IQ ~ - ww��'„ m 8 `a._' pCf ' r 95TH I�, p— i Ii __F :� m tn. . �.= •7® hV Sx 91ST~ \� 5T n m 87TH AY TFx rd�.;• = sw estx :sr --tom 4r, 1 600 90TH AV ET /\ 40TH= �9 o I P �s / i,iik$$ �1F 15000Y 13800 130rr '9 ti� SW 871{1 AY mwi; .-� "�^ s x0�'JDS C sr snnI�L ilpzx WAY �sw 'p H p8 r ? C'S� BLV 1 Kse SW I p::TH AY L.,a yt G* AY SM v, -8 AV d� X0If l IF1Q o 11300 a�' 1100r I,viilcns ! 102001 .,. Po ' '11' SM SOwS.tIGTa I ' etsr -c p 3 ONNdj !c.31 •® � E �I F SW, 85TH: V P� a k n Qq sr - _. J sr rv� I�' sw 5u ox w e eory cwnit �_ ST a g� AY �palter (� � N3�' T 83RD AV ' � { M b,sw FAST! �� mn �?• �� ?n SW 82ND AV 1 f w f AV SW :STN AV .a LT ti SW s . f \ -'© , F 79TH AV a �5 9 d �q, -� ' j 82 : c AV $ �� gg °o ��� ®�dt � 1K5 Ad ��.Cf S a L,w HBO__ ? �E=AV f =g� wry. I SW 7. AY SW 76TH4Ay ' H3��y� SW CHERRY" D. ySAV77H � !W5W�W AY ! SW! !cW74Th a vov m m LANDAU PL I J� ACJtap m _ = m -- 75TH _ N - I rr H 13300 d 4 in!72ND _ �- G �y o w N 72ND IMENIPP11111111r E A'4 I AV SW 72N{ <n 74TH AV � u It Li' y 1 r 'r r 14600 r C 14000_ 'L'' a IINN11 k i 11200 a H l C r tr rn r r sI r �.�Ji,�G�G���>s'EOUOla��,. ,=,, N 7oTH ,; pp' .ter..AV a Co � � 71ST i � 5yE � '' - —- i�..ma�l.m -H a _ SW 70TH PL �-1 �� Q ( m i• C - AWNS AS 4106 r �� ' a 1©I. " W® W 68 CT Y i H10L 1IS al�'� WASHI GT0'..� !,. �®.411166TH = 0 I ' , • AH1Va H199 MS Iv 6 TM „ ir. 4 69TH AY 1 Ii17.SW:OOSEVEL`_ _ - AV I H AY _ 'a 54 Y I 1 Y �/-�- _-_ _- ��H tw t _2 Gr, 6IE AL• g 6,4 A.' * �S _, ....-i" 1gPV 4-11'--SW_ 6�Ta.-- v- -i7__ - R, ..n,Ar a.�H � .� Asro i AP -°32 �g ;I SY SW 63RD ^ t2R e 65TH _ $ ,xn ` I ° /'- Bl I 4 AV 00 tz sN NTH AV = 0 64TH A � SW .'-k" n i �`•ir-. ,,, SW rT p -- ,, I -a m$N 63R0 PL `F;'{% C + 64TH -A-v{i se R ad nEL rT AV '� ' 1n r a I ti N M'�$•,.�•j_!�i SW 62ND AV �I 'L. ND -SW N W ` :----5�} 6380 _;` MS A I k sv FORD PL • PARKER 1- r,ruECR m fir' IRI I + t - lOdb3 Nj kT/ ® = �V M 171: $ 1P�, --- 1 A SN 62ND_ Av °� v amo ehe. O RD � � m xr1 S a 61ST A S en *� Sw� n 'i PS i 'a PL . 2 I �C M1l0 ^..` q ' nun 'EER(M 4, �rsrab- r .W Vmf 60TH AY \ 61ST AY P( A &q I� , g N IMS x.`y._... - TT 2, 4 A A ' 'p ti Sr -___._.._..�F SFR-RD -- �SW 607H i q �� + f=I a ;I ors 15800 , re _ r47F ELE) , �a e �s,,,nF �' � a?amp. °ROGERS pr_Irl:'s■rs.�.�e• r� iSDO \, N H 1J a 5 1:1' �1 +_ f �tN' RD 1' i y a SY 601N xv"I C Nf N °SW 58TH A �R RD �n 1 N �cP r rii, , , .sdnmua0 t 1 Z r 8 T 1r�.r1� `�§,• Al:: rl' I-.' c:•;.•, U 5,}E' -.tc: >T ? L 1 n+ 16 y� ,,r sN / 7°57Tx 5i Y5 c ,^, Sw 59TH AV!i c ' Y n a�, Q ,, lm I 3Y�1 Cr FOSB sAxOA Cri aD Cl RIyY1113,.-4,—JN , r i TPL SN 56TH vW 571E 'Sll 5]7�~Pi SM SlTX":A'^ in$`S o°6 1\ II y < , "rortxctRL rG n ;t,i1P 'sr, `PL.. it A�J�_c,..,s' o S Av s,�, Y S56T��. _ r, g 1 DR N 1 $ HFkTAL xn p��^ � ? r'�- �._im�1 as SW_ 5�G�`y �T`` _ � � ��n S DR��i"T•e+Ii+ri•� � SE' e_I p :iaft� 55TH qym I�1 S 4.1 } 1 I !o° ry k _ -ys��. �+. L o r� L�1 S KINGS "Fr 1n I . ,�q!I 153Rd � if G,p� C..1 �I; -`"Vf9 ^c� 4 ® �r aS .'R: g aY a SW $.%a ___IIII�i' cy� f 1 s - L . O 53RD AV �� =sn : r!1'f�` - I�°_ ;"ro3'�, _ , ' "� I �f � . Ig °. �f', ~ NO Y' P. _ 1 N" Pp a�YV 1 e l�t .?r ',:y,)q r f _ $�.> '^ ' ��" � i n G Stb+' . s Rru¢(a Mtxcera kFt l .R7 L �, 51 �� r Bl SW 052ND AYR,T",...tw:Akztwg;r=.----"-•-gi.sm.---..-=-A-■amr„,IMMitttWWIR Ti lowestamme- Fr.„-rmaigirmaa......2,P, ..irisi-nak__11111111/111121.110110 ' cn dYW 9S9 33S . Mt -13NY.thirici'Ap' • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFNTIG,D,RD Community Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: June 2,2000 / TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department • FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner[x3151 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE[VAR)2000-00008 ➢ RASMUSSEN PROJECT Q PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1 S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA,CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: II--PRIMA'11CPOOMw r NEM-1, 0 •4 .LL OIL .IL h M. . 'L ia1 N y„ I q 1 / IA li lyl.��, i1i ( Z(I) �e._� I R 0 1 .ul �_ Y....�« .:�.:.... ..... 0. rie ..•• I .. .. ..f...W4 j 5 TI f r• _1 •t Q. 0 MAI 4 , ,1 q . IC •I 1,111 r ce i I 4 I .-' ••••• ... artiE%-- —I so.; 8 s- LL ig 11 sirAminit. .. t _,INI hr 74 I 11 _.a..�.o.. i ............. 111 C SW CORAL STREET °""°R°`°R I Cliv OF TIG + SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 AR SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map is not to scale) ■.-M CITY of TIGARD ,� OEOOIIAPNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM IV �� e��o . � VICINITY MAP (---•------•-1 ...,,, CED_I REST ST w ° NP, SDR2000-00003 I] c �� �� - VAR2000-00008 0) I� 1 40 :� RASMUSSEN j PROJECT 16.92, Vi 4 BORDERS ST WI f b LEHMANN SITE 7 ST •�■- z N Cl/ l CORAL 11 ST 0 1 00 200 sow_ 4 500 Feet / ' - ' 1 i i I 1"=361 feet — s . I 4-141■41 ! City of Tigard II I LOCUST ST 1nfomieaon on this map Is for general Iocatlon only and \ should be verified with the Development Services Drvlslon A, . 13125 SW Hall Blvd `— Tigard,DR 97223 '---7—'-----7■...............,...„,. (503)639-1171 1j http://www.d.Gpard,or.us 1 I Plot date:Jun 1,2000;C:VnagicVUTAGIC03.APR Community Development REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IJGARD Community Development Skaping jl Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUN 1 5 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Pert Fox,Associate Planner 1x315) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (503)639-4171/FaX (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00003/VARIANCE[VAR)2000-00008 > RASMUSSEN PROJECT < PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please pravide the following information)Name of Personls)Commenting: e/t,e_s_i__- rr- Q Phone Number's): gqs'- 3 c 2 41i s D o T00 E ONINHHNIDN3 UMA,L 9860 T62 EOS TVA 6V:60 IIILL 00/ST/90 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT TI�GARD Community(Development SfapingA Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 l 4WD ?)4-LIGl RECEIVED PLANNING TO: rney,US West Communications JUN 0 9 2000 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OITY OF TIGARL. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE(VARI 2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide thefot&nt.ing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: , Phone Number(s): 5-61-3 . 2 12 — c651 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: June 2,2000 TO: PI''" Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: 5 t City of Tigard Planning Division JUN 0 5 2000 C►TY OF TICARD STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE[VARI 2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — "PIS IA/ rk/i J 1724 447;A) Vd--Li-e7 h E 4_ L)i 5TR! A Y1J i- - 7794-irt IJATE11_ �.T 5 v t.0 GS pf.v jA- T /71 /Q.tl:.GoA4,14Ervo t2• in-A-r A— IL' bibier 3E 1 -S co Aiv0 P'Pg if N CZ ?a DervA.1 1AX67_ /A/STF W Df V7,4 DMA. (Please provide the foffouring information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: ,Wh I Phone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE: lune 2,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner 1x3151 Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE(VARI 2000-00008 ➢ RASMUSSEN PROJECT Q PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1 S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (T&ase provide the fodowing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Number(sl: CI. JF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMA► IS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS • FILE NOISE: W ,) X o- OOUV 3 �/tTR 2000- ��F LE NAMEISI: ka5mos6e -i l4i0/eel- CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central East South ❑ West ❑ Ii Also Place For Review in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES /LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith.Supervisor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Dvlpmnt Svcs.Technicians )<POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf.Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Lathy Wheatley,City Recorder }OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager _✓ PLANNER- TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL. HILLS PARK & REC. DIST.*XTUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE • TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * 4JNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY * Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 145 ISS N.First Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 91015 Hillsboro,OR 91124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPAJZOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powerrnes In Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N. First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Scott King(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) JK Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Jim Tice)iOA) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Or Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Phil Healy(General Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Sr.Cartographer IcPazc.,Ms14 Portland,OR 97204 Jim Nims(zcA)MO 15 )KODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 Jane Estes,Permit specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:lpattyvnasters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (Revised: 21-Apr-OO) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC RJR(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON ,TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) at McGann (If Project is Within'A Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 i Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE X US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd, Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland 69-in* I Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 IGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23 _ EAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE)Apps.E.otHalVN.of99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Office Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road .---) / 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 l�( GI Portland,OR 97232 *INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPIIANCE_WITH INTERGOVERNMENTALAGREEMENT IF WITHIN100'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). MAILING RECORDS t t AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY of noARD Community(Development Shaping(Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Apwoenare Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: • AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 - RASMUSSEN PROJECT • AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: y / E AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:D AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council C NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S] of which is attached, mar - • Wit "A", was mailed to each name. person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked 3 bIt"B",on Jul 28 2000':n• •-.o, -d in th United States Mail on lull,28,2000, postage prepaid. Pc s.• h wed tice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed bef• - me on the /0 day of Did 7. , 2000. OFFICIAL SEAL RIOT PU�LI�OF O�i�GO SHERMAN S.CASPER /117.,,s,,iaf NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: /.3 ZocJ' COMMISSION NO.323409 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 EXHI1?T A Item , NOTICE of tin, Ii DECISIO N SITE-• DEI/ELOPMENT REVIEW ( D) 2000-00003, p s om mu "; VARIANCE ( R 2000-00008 V 120 DAYS =9/21/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT CASE NOS. Site Development Review (SDR) Type II SDR2000-00003 Variance (VAR) Type I Adjustment VAR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following: 1 . New construction of a tri-plex and one detached unit in a multi-family complex on a lot with one existing detached single-family house. 2. A Type I Adjustment to the north and west setbacks to reduce tree removal. APPLICANT: Kenneth A. Rasmussen OWNERS: Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Ct. 603 Larkspur Ct. Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Sublimity, Oregon 97385 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3, 050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S126DC, Tax Lot 3700. The project is on the west side of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92' Avenue. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA:Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION :1c e b .uerr that th cf liIgard +�mmuni. ei � lir ms`s ides ee ha E ......v10,- � a nest t o �F� Development Rev r subs: in � € I i @' , f� u�enV . a reduction r>i tog a( `8 ck to a"fet, side..se cc Haig �to reduce tree - .{r° ED •4- o uv '° Co 4I "one=" The I uest to fu duce tf►e r$r. ;¢, i t. tD � Is.D Th inoS£and q nd issons on which th decision Wee;-.-' t -o I P VII NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 39 June 8, 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING Planning Divison JUN 1 4 City of Tigard 2000 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. CITY OF TIGARD Tigard, Or 97223 Attn: Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner Subject: Rasmussen Project File Nos. (SDR)2000-00003—(VAR)2000-00008 My name is Larry Zimmerman. My wife and I own property at 9335 S.W. Coral St, which abuts the Rasmussen property to the east. Even though our property is zoned R-12, our home is and will continue to be into the foreseeable future, a single family residential dwelling. We would hope therefore it might be entitled to the same considerations that would prevail if the home were similarly located in a zone of lesser density. In his application, Mr. Rasmussen declares he will meet the requirements of 18.745 by using, along with landscaping, an existing 6' fence on his east lot line. It is noteworthy the mentioned fence is, at the south east corner, approximately 4 feet east of Mr. Rasmussen's east lot line, angling northward to a point approximately 1 foot east of his lot line at the northeast corner. Flagged stakes now mark these corners. If the existing fence is judged to be the screen for the east lot line, it becomes essentially Mr. Rasmussen's fence... while upkeep would remain the responsibility of the Zimmerman. We note the location of tenant dwellings will place them at a point 10 feet more or less above the Zimmerman's rear windows. A person standing at or in the front of the proposed tenant dwellings would have clear line of sight into our family room, kitchen, dining room, back yard and patio area. Mr Rasmussen's application seems to suggest sufficient screen exists on our property to accommodate requirements of this section. There is no such qualifying vegetation. Additional screening would appropriate under 18.745.050(B-7). We note further the location of the rubbish collection area immediately outside our west side fence, approximately 20 feet from our patio. The only screening from this area appears to be the 6' fence mentioned above. There does not seem to be protection from odors usually emanating from rubbish collection areas or from the noises usually associated with them. Taln�-��f We are concerned about drainage and run off control. A very high water table exists in ofr ( our neighborhood. During the wet winter months, our property and those to the east dr collect significant down hill seepage from the higher properties to the north and to the east . The Rasmussen Project will affect this movement of water. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$120.00. 4. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Coral Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local commercial industrial street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Coral Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 5. A profile of SW Coral Street shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 6. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall show all work in the public right-of-way, including the sanitary sewer tap, water service tap(s) and storm drainage work. 7. The applicant shall rovide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 2 OF 39 8. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the ublic improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Perl Fox 639-4171, ext 315) for review and approval: 9. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. 10. The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24- foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. 11. The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. 12. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18,755.050.C.3. 13. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced, or add one (1) additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C, and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size, including tree height and branching width at maturity, and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. 14. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area, and the branching width at maturity. 15. The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east, north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit #2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. 16. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5, or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of tax lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. 17. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. 18. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property (and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parking lot. In addition, the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees (minimum 2' caliper at DBH) on the landscape plan, equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. 19. The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it is has selected, and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 3 OF 39 20. The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G, Section 18.360.090.14, and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Building Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate the two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive, or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls, in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 21. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings, the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4, and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. 22. The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan, and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicant's arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly, and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. 24. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance Chapter 18.795, and figure 18.795.1. 25. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius, and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 26. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide screening in the form of a minimum five (5') foot high wooden fencing, and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun, for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. 27. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house, and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom, the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas, semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention, and to establish maintenance responsibility in accordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. 29. The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime prevention between Proposed Units #4 and #1 , and in the parking lot at lighting levels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends "ground type lighting between Units #1 and #4, and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 4 OF 39 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 31. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection(s). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 32. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 33. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 34. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. lf the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,915.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 35. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. Submit to the Building Division (Bob Poskin 639-4171, ext 392) for review and approval: 36. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall clearly mark and sign all interior drives and access aisles to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 37. Prior to final building inspection, a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING GENERAL PROVISIONS; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 5 OF 39 All sign changes and additions shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City in accordance with Tigard Development Code (TDC) Chapter 18.780, Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.780. TDC Section 18.725.020 requires compliance with applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. All future tenants shall be in compliance with the Environmental Performance Standard as set forth in federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations, and compliance is a continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795. In no case shall trees near the access have branches below eight feet. The applicant shall comply with State and Federal regulations regarding the disturbance of archaeological sites and Native American graves under the Indian Graves Protection Statutes (ORS 97.740.990) and the Protection of Archaeological Sites (ORS 358.905.955 and ORS 390.235.240). The applicant shall stop work and immediately notify the Oregon State Historic Preservation office, and the City of Tigard Planning Division. If suspected Native American human remains are found follow these procedures: First call the nearest office of the State Police; Second, if the remains are Native American, call the Legislative Commission on Indian Services at the State Capitol at 503-968-1067; and Third, call the State Historic Preservation Office at 503-378-4168, ext. 232. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is located in a predominately existing single-family residential use area which is zoned R-12, with the exception of property to the north zoned R.5. There is an existing single-family residence with attached garage on the site. Vicinity Information: The site is located west of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92nd Avenue. To the north of the site is property zoned R-4.5 in detached single-family use. To the east and west of the site is property zoned R-12 Medium Density Residential in detached single-family use. To the southeast of the site is a vacant lot zoned R-12. To the southwest of the site is a lot with a detached single-family dwelling zoned R-12. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is comprised of one lot, Tax Lot 3700. The existing house is proposed to be retained, and will become part of the multi-family complex. The proposal includes the new construction of a tri-plex and a detached dwelling unit on a lot with an existing house which is to be retained. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to construct four new dwelling units, and retain one existing detached single-family residence on the same lot. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Household Living. The site is located within the Medium Density Residential District. Table 18.510.1 lists Household Living Retail as a permitted use in the R-12 zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 6 OF 39 This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision-making procedures. Type II procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice, and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Officer. Type I procedures apply to ministerial permits and actions containing clear and objective approval criteria. Type I actions are decided by the Director without public notice and without a public hearing. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Two letters of comment were received from neighboring property owners as follows: Summary Hansen Letter: One letter was received from June Hansen of 9395 SW Coral Street dated June 13, 2000, and received June 15, 2000. The Hansen property abuts the subject property to the west. Hansen is in opposition to the proposed project and to the granting of a variance to the west side setback requirements. The basis that she gives for her objection is TDC Chapter 18.360.010, Purpose, General Purpose 3. Her objection includes the following: 1. The types of structures to be built are not similar to others in the neighborhood, or in the Washington Square Town Center. 2. Objection to the adjustment to the west side setback is based on Section 18.360.090. "He has met (1) "Preservation of existing trees" at the expense of (3) "Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate lighting, circulation and fire-fighting." 3. Concern regarding protection of the massive fir trees, over 100 years old with shallow roots, that may be disturbed by ongoing development of the project. Review of this project by an arborist is warranted. Staff Response to Hansen letter: 1 . The applicable approval criteria in the Tigard Community Development code are listed and addressed in this decision. The site is zoned R-12 and surrounded by property zoned R-12. It is the zone, rather than the use that governs in most of the standards, except the buffering and screening standards. 2. The west side setback reduction is limited to the rear of the lot adjacent to Proposed Unit #2 which is adjacent to the far-north end of the rear yard of June Hansen, not adjacent to any buildings on her property. 3. Protection of existing trees is addressed under Section 18.360.090.A.2, Relationship to the natural and physical environment. An arborist report was submitted with this land-use application and is available for public review. Staff agrees that great care should be taken to preserve all significant trees, including all trees over 12" in caliper. Summary Zimmerman/Fisher letter: A second letter was received from the property owner, Larry and Donna Zimmerman, to the immediate east of the subject site at 9335 SW Coral St. The property owners, Michael and Randy Fisher, located at 9255 SW Coral St. also signed the letter in support of the concern about drainage and run-off issues, issue # 5 below. A summary of the issues raised by the neighboring property owner are as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 7 OF 39 1 . The abutting property to east is zoned R-12, however, the property is in single-family use. Zimmerman requests that their property be entitled to the same consideration as if the property were zoned for Low Density Residential District. 2. The proposed fence for screening the Rasmussen Project to the east is located on their property to the east, not on Mr. Rasmussen's property. Concern is raised about who will own the fence and who will be responsible for upkeep of the fence. The Zimmerman's request that Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and directed to construct a solid 8-foot site obscuring fence inside his property line. 3. Concern is raised about the location of tenant dwellings at about 10 feet above their rear windows. "A person standing at or in the front of the proposed tenant dwelling would have clear line of sight into our family room, kitchen, dining room, back yard and patio area. Screening is insufficient and there is no qualifying vegetation. Additional screening is needed. The Zimmerman's request that Mr. Rasmussen be granted a variance and be required to provide a noise/sound screen of Arborvitae, 8- foot at planting, on not less than 36" centers, and two trees of suitable height to immediately screen direct line of sight into the rearward areas of our home. 4. There is insufficient screening of the trash collection area which is located 20 feet from our rear patio. The Zimmerman's request that the rubbish container area be moved to another location or heavily screened and covered to avoid odor and noise pollution in our back yard. 5. Concern is raised about drainage and run-off control. "A very high water table exists in our neighborhood. During the wet winter months, our property and those to the east collect significant down hill seepage from the higher properties to the north and to the east. The Rasmussen Project will affect this movement of water. It appears that what was ground water, or seepage will now be run off because of the impervious surfaces created by the project. The current volume of water running in the culvert/ditch drainage system already causes down stream flooding each year. The impact of additional volume from impervious surface run-off would be significant and is of concern to the down stream neighborhood." The Zimmerman's together with the Fisher's, request that Mr. Rasmussen be required to upgrade the existing culvert water drainage system east ward to 90th Avenue to accommodate the additional water run-off created by the impervious surfaces. Staff Response to Zimmerman/Fisher letter: 1 . The Tigard Community Development Chapter 18.510, Residential Zoning District, provides the Development Standards for the R-12 zoning district under Section 18.510.050 and Table 18.510.0. With the exception of the Table 18.745.1 Buffer Matrix which considers the existing use rather than the zone, most TDC standards related to compatibility with the abutting property are applied to the zoning district rather than the existing use. 2. Screening is required to be provided and maintained by the applicant/owner on his property, unless the adjacent property owner agrees to the use of the fence for screening on their property, and a maintenance agreement is signed between the parties, and City of Tigard to maintain the fence and any other screening required. his issue is addressed further in this decision under Chapter 18.745, Section 18.745.050, and 18.360.090.4. 3. One-story dwelling Unit #3 at the northeast corner of the subject site is located approximately 68 feet from the northwest corner of the attached garage on the neighboring property to the east. Therefore, the Zimmerman's description of very close proximity (within 10 feet) of the multi-plex to their dwelling does not appear to be accurate. The applicant meets the required 30-foot setback to the east property in accordance with Chapter 18.510 and Table 18.510.2. This issue is addressed further in this decision under Section 18.510.050, Chapter 18.745, Section 18.745.050, and Section 18.360.090.4. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 8 OF 39 4. Screening of the trash recycling area is addressed under Chapter 18.755 and Section 18.745.050.E.4, Screening of refuse containers. 5. Drainage and run-off issues are addressed under Section 18.810.100A in this decision. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Zoning Districts 18.510 (Residential Zoning Districts) B. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.715 Density Computation) 18.720 Design Compatibility) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) Land Use Decisions C. 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) D. 18.370 Variance) E. 18.390 Impact Study Section 18.390.040) F. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of these Specific Development Standard Code Chapters: 18.710 (Accessory Residential Units), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18,740 (Historic Overlay), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.775 Sensitive Lands), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.797 (Water Resources Overlay District), 8.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Residential Zoning District: Section 18.510.020 Lists the description of the Residential Zoning Districts. The site is located in the R-12 zoning district: Medium Density Residential. Development Standards: Section 18.510.050 States that Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 9 OF 39 EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES R-l2 STANDARD s1F DU* Proposed SF DU** Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit 3,050 sq.ft.per unit -Attached unit -Duplexes -Boarding,lodging,rooming house • Average Lot Width None None None • Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. 17ft-9inches 15 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 20 ft. N/A 10 ft. -Side yard 10 ft. 8 ft.—1 inch. 5 ft.[1] -Rear yard 20 ft. 16 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. -Distance between property line and garage entrance 20 ft. N/A ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage[2] 80% 80% Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% 20% [1]Except this shall not apply to attached units on the lot line on which the units are attached. [2]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. * Multiple-family dwelling unit ** Single-family dwelling unit The total site area is 18,719 square feet. The total building footprint area for the site is approximately 4,584 square feet. The total building and impervious surface area is approximately 11,115 square feet, or 59% according to the applicant's figures. The proposed lot coverage does not exceed the maximum lot coverage requirement of 80%. According to the applicant, the total combined landscape area on the site is 7,604 square feet, however, for purposes of calculating landscaping percentage, the private outdoor and shared outdoor space must be deducted in accordance with Section 18.360.090.A.12b for multi-family units. Therefore, 800 square feet must be deducted for shared outdoor recreation space and 400 for private outdoor space, reducing the total landscaping coverage to 6,404 square feet which is 34.2%. Therefore, the landscaping percentage exceeds the minimum landscape requirement of 20%. The (north) rear yard setback is proposed to be either 10 or 16 feet, and the west side yard setback is proposed at eight (8') feet. As the rear and side yard setbacks do not meet the minimum setback requirements of 20 feet and 10 feet respectively, the applicant has submitted a request for an Adjustment to these setbacks to reduce tree removal. The setback requests are addressed under a Type I Adjustment under Section 18.370.020.0.7 in this decision. The request for a 10-foot rear yard is denied, however, the request for a 16-foot rear yard and 8-foot west side yard adjacent to Unit #2 only is approved (see adjustment analysis page 32). The proposed new multi-family dwelling units are to be one story in height, and are approximately 16 feet to the peak of the gable roof, and 12 feet to the midpoint on the gable roof. The proposed height is well below the maximum height allowed of 35 feet. FINDING: Maximum height, maximum lot coverage, and minimum landscape coverage standards area are met. The east and south side yard setback standards are met. The proposed plans (dated 4/20/00) which incorporates a 16-foot rear yard setback, and an 8-foot west side yard requires a Type I Adjustment to reduce setbacks due to tree preservation and is subject to the criteria under Section 18.370.020.0.7. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 10 OF 39 B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. The applicable Tigard Community Development Code (TDC) criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VI. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the TDC: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; This standard is not applicable as this is a proposed residential use. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Each residential dwelling within the multi-family development is proposed to be connected by a walkway to the parking area, and to the areas demarked for shared outdoor recreation. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6- inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does not cross the vehicle access drive or parking lot. The proposed walkway does not meet the dimensional and design requirements of this standard and the site plan shall be revised as follows: The applicant shall ensure that the walkway shall have a minimum 6-inch vertical dimension at the curb along the edge of the parking lot area. Because the walkway shall be a minimum four-foot clear width, the proposed auto overhang (at the parking spaces) shall not be greater than one-foot, and shall be dimensioned on the plan. The walkway shall be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and ADA standards. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant proposes concrete walkways. No lighting is proposed for the site other than wall mounted lights attached to the individual dwelling units. The Police Department has provided comments with regard to lighting for the site. Proposed wall mounted lighting on the individual units is not adequate for crime prevention and safety. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 11 OF 39 FINDING: The standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. H. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; TABLE 18.705.2 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE Dwelling Units Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Sidewalks, Driveways Required Required etc. 1-2 1 15' 10' 3-19 1 30' 24' if two-way, 15' if one-way: Curbs and 5'walkway required 20-49 1 30' 24' if two-way or 2 30' 15' if one-way: Curbs and 5' walkway required 50-100 2 30' 24' Curbs and 5' walkway required As there are five (5) units proposed, a minimum of one (1) access is required with a thirty (30') foot minimum access required, and minimum pavement width of twenty-four (24') feet for the two-way traffic. The applicant proposes two accesses to the site as follows: 1) Retention of the existing access (south of the existing house) which has a roughly 19-foot apron at the street and is proposed to be re-paved with an 11'-6' minimum pavement width, and 2) a new access with a 30-foot access and 24-foot minimum pavement width with curbs and 5-foot sidewalk. However, the applicant's site and landscape plans do not clearly indicate the proper access width. 2. Vehicular access to multi-family structures shall be brought to within 50 feet of the ground floor entrance or the ground floor landing of a stairway, ramp, or elevator leading to the dwelling units; Vehicular access to this multi-family complex is within 25 feet of the ground floor entrances to all of proposed new dwellings. 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code; Private residential access drives are proposed, therefore, this criterion is met. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet;. c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is 5%. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 12 OF 39 The proposed access drive is approximately 89 feet in length, therefore, this criteria does not apply. However, comments from the Building Division, state that this proposed roject does not comply with Fire Department access radius, 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. The access shall be re-desi ned in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. 5. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; This criterion is not applicable as the proposed driveways are do not exceed 200 feet in length. 6. Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. The driveway approach is to a local street (Coral Street), therefore, this criterion is inapplicable. FINDING: This standard has not been met as the applicant has not clearly dimensioned the width of the proposed accesses at the street and has not met the requirements for fire access radius. Therefore, in order to satisfy this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24-foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. DENSITY COMPUTATIONS: CHAPTER 18.715 Density Calculation: 18.715.020 A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross acres, which is all of the land included in the legal description of the property to be developed: • All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain; b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%; c. Drainage ways; and d. Wetlands. • All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; • All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage; Multi-family development: allocate 15% of gross acreage. • All land proposed for private streets; and • A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. The site area is 18,719 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R-12 zone is 3,050 square feet for multi-family dwelling units. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. The maximum number of residential units for the entire site is calculated by dividing 18,719 by 3,050 square feet per unit which equals 6.13 and is rounded down to six (6) units. The applicant proposes 5 units including the existing house. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: This standard for maximum density is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 13 OF 39 C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in Subsection B above by 80% (0.8). The minimum number of residential units for the site is calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units 6.13 x 80% which equals 4.90, and is rounded up to five (5) units. As five (5) units are proposed, this standard is met. FINDING: The standard for minimum density is met. Applicability of Provisions: 18.720.020 These provisions apply to all multi-family and attached single-family residential projects in zoning districts R-4.5 through R-40 that abut property zoned for single-family residential development. These standards are applicable to this site as the abutting property to the north is zoned R-4.5, Low Density Residential, which is considered to be zoned for "single-family residential development." Design standards: Section 18.720.030 18.720.030 Design Standards A. Density transition. When a multi-family or attached single-family project abuts property zoned for detached single-family, the following design standards shall apply: This standard is applicable as this is a multi-family project in R-12, Medium Density Residential, abutting property zoned R-4.5, Low Density Residential, to the north. As this site abuts property zoned R-12 to the east, south and west, the standards related to building height and planes are only considered applicable to the north facing facades of Proposed Units #1, 2, and 3. The applicability of all the other design standards are addressed via the staff response to each standard. 1. Building height shall not exceed two stories or 25 feet within 30 feet of the property line or three stories or 35 feet within 50 feet of the property line; The building height is 12 feet to the midpoint of the gable roof (and 16 feet to the peak) on all of the proposed new units, and does not exceed this standard at any location on the site, therefore, this criterion is met. 2. Building planes for multi-family dwellings within 50 feet of the common property line(s) and abutting public rights-of-way shall be subject to the following standards: All of the proposed new multi-family dwelling units have building planes within 50 feet of the common property line, therefore, this criterion is applicable. a. No building plane that faces the common property line shall exceed 960 square feet within 30 feet or 1,400 square feet within 50 feet of the property line; The front and rear building planes are approximately 270 square feet. The side building planes are approximately 382 square feet. There is no building plane greater than 30 feet on the proposed new units. Therefore, none of the building planes on the proposed new units exceed 960 square feet within 30 feet. b. No building plane shall have a dimension greater than 40 feet in length or 35 feet in height; There is no building plane greater than 30 feet on the proposed new units, therefore, this criterion is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 14 OF 39 c. If more than one building plane faces a property line and building planes align at a common distance from the line, the building planes shall be horizontally separated by at least 20 feet. For purposes of this standard, "common distance" shall be defined as within 12 feet; Proposed Units #1 and 3 are aligned at a common distance from the north property line, and are separated horizontally by approximately 30 feet by Proposed Unit #2. Therefore, this criterion is met. d. Building plane is defined as a surface that includes a building wall that extends from the ground to the top of each wall of a structure. Area is determined by multiplying the length of each wall by the height. The plane does not include roof area. When a structure along a wall juts out from the wall, or is off-set from an adjacent part less than four feet, the structure is considered part of the building plane of the wall behind it. If the structure protrudes more than four feet, it represents a separate building plane. If a building plane is at an angle in relation to the property line, the midpoint of the wall shall provide the point at which the plane and related distances are measured. These concepts are illustrated in Figure 18.720.1. These concepts are applied in the criteria above and below in this Section of the decision. No building plane is at an angle to the property line, therefore, this portion of the criterion is not applicable. B. Front facades. All primary ground-floor common entries or individual unit entries of street frontage units shall be oriented to the street, not to the interior or to a parking lot. The front elevation of large structures must be divided into smaller areas or planes of 500 square feet or less. Projecting features such as porches, balconies, bays and dormer windows and roof pediments are encouraged for structures facing a street to create visual interest. This criterion is not applicable as the buildings are oriented with their entries to the south, away from the property zoned R-4.5. FIGURE IE ILLUSTRATION OP DESIGN CONCEPTS ^'I-,.Fr. �11 , w'y.B I Cann R.P.rty Icob`. aw,,v..�J�r ILMIWIL IIIIIUNDi '�;Illgr_ -' r E I tIP■11 • • k p 1 C. Main entrance. Primary structures must be oriented with their main entrance facing the street upon which the project fronts. If the site is on a corner, it may have its main entrance oriented to either street or at the corner. This criterion is addressed above under B. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 15 OF 39 D. Unit definition. Each dwelling unit shall be emphasized by including a roof dormer or bay windows on the street-facing elevation, or by providing a roof gable or porch that faces the street. Ground-level dwelling units shall include porches that shall be at least 48 square feet in area with no dimension less than six feet. This criterion is not applicable as the street-facing elevations face property zoned R-12. E. Roof lines. Roof-line offsets shall be provided at intervals of 40 feet or less to create variety in the massing of structures and to relieve the effect of a single, long roof. Roof line offsets shall be a minimum 4-foot variation either vertically from the gutter line or horizontally. The attached dwelling units which back to the property zoned R-4.5 are staggered with 5-foot variation horizontally, therefore, this criterion is met. F. Trim detail. Trim shall be used to mark all building roof lines, porches, windows and doors that are on a primary structure's street-facing elevation(s). As the north facade is not street facing, this standard does not apply. However, it is recommended that the applicant provide trim detail in accordance with this standard. G. Mechanical equipment. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, other than vents or ventilators, shall be located and constructed so as to be screened from ground-level view. Screening shall be integrated with exterior building design. No roof-mounted mechanical equipment is indicated on the elevations, other than vents, therefore, this criterion is satisfied. If mechanical equipment is intended to be placed on the roofs, and can be viewed from the property to the north, then the elevations shall be revised in accordance with this standard. H. Parking. Parking and loading areas may not be located between the primary structure(s) and the street upon which the structure fronts. It there is no alley and motor vehicle access is from the street, parking must be provided: 1. In a garage that is attached to the primary structure; 2. In a detached accessory structure located at least 50 feet from the front property line; or 3. In a parking area at the side or rear of the site. This standard is not applicable as the proposed parking and loading area fronts property zoned R12. I. Pedestrian circulation. 1. The on-site pedestrian circulation system shall be continuous and connect the ground-level entrances of primary structure(s) to the following: a. Streets abutting the site; b. Common buildings such as laundry and recreation facilities; c. Parking areas; d. Shared open space and play areas; e. Abutting transit stops; and f. Any pedestrian amenity such as plazas, resting areas and viewpoints. As the building's ground level entries face Coral Street and property is zoned R-12, this criterion is not applicable. However, it is recommended that the walkway be connected to the future public sidewalk along Coral Street. 3. There shall be at least one pedestrian connection to an abutting street frontage for each 200 linear feet of street frontage. This is criterion is addressed in 2. above. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 16 OF 39 FINDING: This standard is met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. As this is a typical multi-family dwelling complex, and this is a permitted use in the R-12 zone, the above performance standards are met. The Neighborhood comments raised concerns about the potential odors, and noise from the trash recycling and requested that either the refuse area be moved to another location away from the Zimmerman's property to the east of the subject site, or that the refuse area be heavily screened. Screening of the refuse area is addressed under Section 18.745.050.E.4., and under Chapter 18.755 in this decision. The refuse area shall be located outside of the buffer area. FINDING: This standard has been not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. Section 18.745.040.0 provides specific requirements for tree spacing including: Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Subsection 2 which includes the specific spacing of street trees by size of tree, small, medium or large. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility policies to maintain visual clearance; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 17 OF 39 The property has approximately 106.3 lineal feet of frontage along Coral Street, therefore, Section 18.745.040 is applicable, and street trees shall be planted along Coral Street. Deducting the estimated widths of the two accesses of 49 feet, there is 57 feet remaining of street frontage. Therefore, two large or medium size trees are required. The applicant has proposed to retain two existing Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) trees (one, 18-inch and one, 36-inch caliper tree) to satisfy the street tree requirement. The 36-inch Locust tree is located in about the center of the street frontage about 38 feet west of the access to the multi-family dwellings. The 18-inch Locust tree is located about 10 feet east of the existing driveway to the existing house. There is approximately 20 feet between the trunks of the Locust trees. The applicant has not provided reference material confirming the tree size classification, and branching width at maturity for the Locust trees. On July 20, 2000 staff phone contacted the arborist, Walter Knapp, who stated that the branching width at maturity for the Locust trees is 30 feet. Therefore, the Locust trees would be considered medium sized trees, and the existing spacing does not meet the standard. FINDING: The criteria for street trees has been not been satisfied. If the condition below is satisfied, then the criteria will be met. CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced, or add one (1) additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C, and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size, including tree height and branching width at maturity, and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.745.1 BUFFER MATRIX Single Units, Detached; Attached Single Units and Attached Single Units Manufactured Units Multifamily, 1-5 Units; and Multifamily,5+Units Duplexes EXISTING/ABUTTING USE Detached Single Units;Manufactured Units -- A C Attached Single Units and Multifamily, A -- B 1-5 Units, Duplexes Attached Single Units and Multifamily, A A -- 5+Units Mobile Home Parks A A B Commercial Zones(CC,CG,CP,CBD) C C C Neighborhood Commercial Zone(CN) C C C Mixed Use Employment Zone(MUE) C C C Light Industrial Zones(IP, IL) D D D Heavy Industrial Zone(IH) D D D Parking Lots C C C Arterial Streets A A A Note: See Table 18.745.2 for alternative combinations for meeting these screening requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 18 OF 39 • TABLE 18.745.2 BUFFER COMBINATIONS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING [1] Options Width (feet) Trees Shrubs or Groundcover Screening (per linear feet of buffer) A -- 10 -- Lawn/living -- -- 10 20' min/30'max spacing Lawn/living -- B groundcover - - 1 10 Shrubs 4'hedges C 2 8 15'min/30'max spacing Shrubs 5'fence 3 6 Shrubs 6'wall 1 20 Shrubs 6' hedge D 2 15 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6'fence 3 10 Shrubs 6'wall 1 30 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge or fence E 2 25 Shrubs 5'earthen berm or wall F -- 40 10'min/20'max spacing Shrubs 6' hedge,fence,wall or [1] Buffers are not required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street as specified in Section 18.745.050 A2. [2] Adjustments from these requirements can be obtained; see Section 18.370.020 C4. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. The Buffer Matrix Table 18.745.1 indicates that where the multi-family units (5+ units) abut detached single—family units to the north, east and west, the Buffer and Screening Standard is C. With a minimum five (5') foot fence, Standard C requires a buffer width of eight feet, and trees spaced between 15 to 30 feet apart. No buffer is required along the south property line as it abuts Coral Street. The applicant has proposed an eight (8) foot buffer with six-foot-high arborvitae along the majority of the north and east property lines, and an eight-foot buffer with three feet high arborvitae along the west property line. Seven (7) Maple trees are proposed to be planted in the buffer area with varied spacing, two (2" caliper) Flowering Plum trees are proposed to be retained along the west property, and two (20' caliper) Black Walnut trees are proposed to be retained to the west of the existing house. Tree spacing exceeds the 30-foot maximum at some locations. However, there are some locations where the buffer does not meet the standard as follows: 1. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit #2 encroaches into the buffer by one (1) foot. 2. A drop box is located in the buffer area along the east property line. 3. The water quality swale is located within the buffer area along the south end of the east property line for a length of 68 feet, and no landscape screening is proposed in this area. 4. The fencing and arborvitae proposed along the east and west property lines does not extend the full length of the east-west property lines. The screening and landscaping extends from the northeast and northwest corners of the site, along the east and west property lines, to points adjacent to the rear of existing garages on the abutting property. This is problematic particularly because a new water quality swale and parking lot are to be constructed along the southeastern portion of the site. 5. Tree spacing exceeds the 30-foot maximum at some locations within the buffer area. According to Section 18.745.050.B.2 a buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No building, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in the buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City. Buffering and Screening are addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 19 OF 39 Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4) foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years of planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant has proposed a six (6') foot high fence for screening, however, the fence along the east property line is several feet over the property line and is owned by the abutting property owner. The fence is not proposed to screen the entire site and stops about 83 feet north of the southwest corner of the site, and about 59 feet north of the southeast corner of the site. As a consequence, the proposed water quality swale area and a portion of the parking lot would not be screened from view by the abutting property owners. Also, the property owners to the west of the site would be able to view the Proposed New Units at an angle looking northeast. Therefore, screening shall be continuous along the east, north and south perimeters of the site, and the applicant shall either provide the screening on his property or obtain an agreement with the abutting property owner's to the east regarding the use of the existing fence on their property for screening purposes. In any case, the applicant shall be fully responsible to the City of Tigard for the maintenance of the fence, and any agreement with the neighboring property owner shall contain language to that effect. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. FINDING: The Buffering and Screening standards are not met. However, the standards will be met if the following conditions are met: CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall revise the landscape plan, and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area, and the branching width at maturity. • The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east, north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit #2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. • The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5, or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of tax lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. • The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 20 OF 39 Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven 7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the andscape islands shall be three-feet-wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant proposes to screen the parking lot with one (2" caliper) Flowering Plum tree. The proposed screening is inadequate. The applicant shall revise the site plan and add low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property and from property across Coral Street to the south. At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest portions of the parking lot. The applicant has not indicated any parking lot trees on the landscape plan. A minimum of two parking lot trees are required to be equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. FINDING: This standard has not been met as parking lot screening and landscaping, including parking lot trees, is insufficient to meet the standard. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery (at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property (and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum, screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parking lot. In addition, the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees (minimum 2"caliper at DBH) on the landscape plan, equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse and shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans indicate a drop box along the east property line. The applicant has not provided any information regarding proposed screening of the trash enclosure area as required. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18,755.050.C.3. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive Recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The Minimum standards method requires that Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 21 OF 39 Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional 5 square feet per unit for each unit above 10. The multi-family complex includes 4 new dwelling units. The applicant has proposed a trash enclosure of 30-35 square feet. However, the applicant has not specified the method of pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant has provided a faxed letter dated July 18, 2000 from Pride Disposal Company to provide refuse and recyclable collection. FINDING: This standard is not met as the applicant has not specified the method of pick-up and removal by haulers. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it is has selected, and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 This Chapter is applicable for development projects when there is new construction, expansion of existing use, or change of use in accordance with Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements. General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; Unless otherwise specified Access, Egress and Circulation criteria are addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and There is an existing 19-foot-wide driveway (11'-6" pavement width) to the west of the existing house which the applicant proposes to pave. The applicant proposes to pave the surface of the new access driveway along the southeast portion of the property. The applicant has not specified the material to be used for paving. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. All parking spaces are served by a service drive, however, the service drive does not meet the minimum access drive width of 24 feet for two-way traffic, therefore, this standard is not met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 22 OF 39 Pedestrian Access: Section 18.705.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow- moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This standard is addressed primarily under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. The applicant shall provide a railing, or other approved barrier around the water quality swale area to prevent slow moving vehicles from escaping into this area, and to prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; The parking area is to be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The site plan indicates defined parking spaces via parking striping. Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has indicated wheel stops on all new parking spaces approximately one (1)foot back from the front of the parking stalls. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back form the front of the parking stall in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Lighting is addressed under Sections 18.705.030.F.4 and 18.360.090.A.10 in this decision. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. All sign changes and additions shall be submitted as part of a separate sign permit application, and are not addressed in this decision. No new signs shall be placed or altered prior to review and approval by the City. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 23 OF 39 Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. From Figure 18.765.1 Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50%standard spaces, 50%compact spaces. All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. A A Parking Angle • B Stall Width B C Stall Depth (no bumper overhang) E-j D Aisle Width Between Stall Lines (5) F o E Stall Width Parallel to Aisle 1 F Module Width (no bumper overhang) G Bumper Overhang The applicant has p roposed all 90 degree parking spaces. All standard 90 degree parking spaces are required to be a minimum of 8'-5' wide by 18"-5" deep. The applicant is allowed up to 50% compact parking on the site which is required have minimum dimensions of 7'-5 wide x 16.5' deep. The proposed parking is 8'-0" wide by 15' deep with a one-foot overhang onto the five (5) wide sidewalk which does not meet the minimum required space dimensions for compact or standard spaces. In addition, the applicant has not provided the required one (1) van accessible parking space (nine feet wide) and aisle (eight feet wide adjacent to the passenger side). Accessible parking is addressed in more detail under Section 18.360.090.14 in this decision. The applicant is required to provide a 24-foot-wide access aisle in the parking lot. The proposed site shows two parking spaces blocking the 24-foot access aisle. As the applicant has proposed two more parking spaces than the required minimum for the site, these spaces can be eliminated, or replaced with one parking space oriented north-south, rather than east-west. FINDING: This standard has not been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the standard will be met: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G, Section 18.360.090.14, and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Buildinc Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate he two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive, or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls, in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 24 OF 39 In accordance with Table 18.765.2, the minimum requirement for bicycle parking stalls in a multi-family development is 1.0/2 units. As there are four (4) new units, therefore, the minimum number of parking stalls required is two (2). The applicant proposes to locate four (4) covered parking stalls in front of Proposed Unit #2 which is within 50 feet of the primary entrances of Units #1, 2, and 3. The bicycle stalls are conveniently located adjacent to the five (5) foot sidewalk, and are not located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings, the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4, and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The Director may reduce the total required off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070.H by up to a total of 20% by means of parking adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5a. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-Street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MAXIMUM'1 MINIMUM ZONE A ZONE B BICYCLE"' RESIDENTIAL Household Living Single Units,Attached See Multifamily(M) none(M) none(M) None Single Units, Detached 1.0/DU none(M) none(M) None Accessory Units 1.0/DU none none None Duplexes None Multifamily Units DU<500 sq ft: 1.0/DU(M) none(M) none(M) 1.0/2 DUs except elderly, 1 bedroom: 1.25/DU(M) which is 1.0/20 DUs 2 bedroom: 1.5/DU(M) 3 bedroom: 1.75/DU(M) The minimum number of parking spaces can be determined from TDC Table 18.765.2 above. There are four (4) proposed new two bedroom multi-family units and one existing single-family detached unit on the site. Minimum required parking is calculated by multiplying 1.5 parking spaces by 4 which equals 6 spaces. In addition, a minimum of one (1) parking space is required for the existing single-family dwelling. Therefore, the total number of required spaces is seven (7). A total of nine (9) parking spaces are proposed for the site, including eight (8) spaces in the parking lot, and one (1) separate space for the existing house. Four (4) of the parking spaces are proposed to covered via a four (4) stall carport. There is no maximum parking required for a multi-family complex. FINDING: This standard is met as the minimum parking requirement is met by the 9 proposed parking spaces for the site. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 Requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum the, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008—RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 25 OF 39 As this is a residential development, no off-street loading is required. FINDING: This standard is met. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. There are 9 existing trees on the site according to the Tree Plan submitted by the applicant's arborist, Water Knapp. Eight of the nine trees will be retained. One hazardous 20" walnut tree with heart rot will be removed. The arborist has not submitted a numbered existing tree plan to clearly depict which trees will be retained, and the applicant's site plan does not exactly match the arborist data. However, clearly more than 75% percent of trees 12 inches or greater will be retained. The arborist has submitted a Tree Protection Plan. FINDING: This standard is met. However, to implement the tree protection plan the following conditions shall be satisfied: CONDITIONS: The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan, and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicant's arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly, and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all roperty adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The applicant has not shown a 30-foot visual clearance triangles on each side of the centerline of the accesses to the site on the site plan. However, it appears that the proposed project will meet the a visual clearance standards, however, this shall be confirmed by the applicant. The 30-foot visual clearance area contains no visual obstructions exceeding three feet in height. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance Chapter 18.795, and figure 18.795.1. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 26 OF 39 C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA: CHAPTER 18.360 Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standard is inapplicable No. 8. (100-year floodplain). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: • Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; There are 10 existing trees (and one 26" spruce just north of the site) on the site according to the Tree Plan submitted by the applicant's arborist, Water Knapp. Nine trees are proposed to be retained. One, 20" Black Walnut tree is considered hazardous by the arborist and is proposed for removal due to heart rot. The applicant has requested an Adjustment to reduce tree removal for the 42" conifer located in front of Proposed Unit #2 in this decision. The applicant has satisfied this criterion for preservation of existing trees. The site slopes gently to the southeast where a water quality swale is proposed. The applicant does not propose to change the natural topography of the site, therefore, this criterion is met. • Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has stated that there is no ground slumping evident on the site. • Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation , and fire-fighting; and The closest locations of new dwellings to existing adjoining buildings are as follows: Proposed Unit #4 is proposed to be located a distance of 15 feet from the existing garage on the property to the west, and 15 feet and 3 inches north of the existing house on the same lot. Proposed Unit #3 is located about 68 feet from the existing attached garage on the property to the east. As Proposed Unit #4 meets the minimum ten (10') foot side setback requirement to the west, the proposed distance is adequate. • Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The new proposed dwelling units are oriented north-south with entries facing south toward Coral Street. Proposed Unit #4 is located a distance of 15'-3" behind and to the north of the existing house on the same lot. Proposed Unit #1 is located a distance of 26'-1" behind and to the north of Proposed Unit #4. No information was provided by the applicant as to the height of the existing house, therefore, it is unclear to what extent the existing house on the subject lot may block sunlight to Proposed Unit #4. There was also no solar shading analysis provided regarding the potential solar shading of Proposed Unit #1 by Proposed Unit #4. Though staff is concerned about potential solar shading between the aforementioned, there does not appear to be solar shading issues that would be caused by the proposed new construction to adjoining property. The site design of the new units is oriented with consideration for protection from southwesterly winds, as the units are clustered close together and behind existing buildings. Also, Proposed Unit #4 will provide wind protection to the other new units as it is located just southwest of the other new units. As the rear of the new units face north, the buildings are reasonable oriented for protection from northwesterly winds. FINDING: These criteria are met with the exception of adequate fire access radius as per the Building Division comments contained in this decision. In order to meet this criterion, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 27 OF 39 CONDITION:Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius, and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Tree removal and preservation is addressed under Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is met. Exterior Elevations: Section 18.360.090.A.3 Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: 1) Recesses, e.g. decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet. 2 Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and 3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Dwelling units are 30 feet wide, therefore, any common features shown on the units are at a minimum interval of 30 feet. Each new dwelling unit is proposed to have a patio extension of ten (10') feet. Each new dwelling unit is proposed to have a gabled-roof dormer with the height of dormer approximately 3'-9" at the midpoint of the gable. FINDING: This standard is met. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: • The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the urpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The purpose of the buffer is to provide a visual barrier and allow for light and air circulation between the proposed buildings and adjacent single-family use. The Buffering and Screening standards in this section are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. Screening standards in this Section are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 28 OF 39 Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: Section 18.360.090.5 a. Structures which include residential dwelling units shall provide private outdoor areas for each ground floor unit which is screened from view by adjoining units as provided in Subsection 6.a below; b. The buildings shall be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise; c. On-site uses which create noise, light, or glare shall be buffered from adjoining residential uses; and d. Buffers shall be placed on the site as necessary to mitigate noise, light or glare from off-site sources. Private outdoor patios ten (10') foot x (10') foot, are provided for each multi-family dwelling unit. It is unclear what the applicant is proposing for screening for these patio areas. Of particular concern with regards to privacy and noise is Proposed Unit #4's patio location which is adjacent to the front entrance to Proposed Unit #1. All of the private outdoor spaces are on the north sides of the buildings and, therefore, are not well oriented for sunlight. Buffering is addressed under Section 18.745.050 in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standards, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide screening in the form of minimum five (5') foot high wooden fencing, and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun, for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: Section 18.360.090.A.6 a. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and (1) Balconies used for entrances or exits shall not be considered as open space except where such exits or entrances are for the sole use of the unit; and (2) Required open space may include roofed or enclosed structures such as a recreation center or covered picnic area. b. Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and c. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. This standard is addressed together with Section 18.360.090.A.5 above in this decision. FINDING:This standard is not met. See condition under Section 18.360.090.A.5 above. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: Section 18.360.090.A.7 a. In addition to the requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: 1 Studio up to and including two-bedroom units, 200 square feet per unit; and (2) Three or more bedroom units, 300 square feet per unit. b. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 29 OF 39 (1) It may be all outdoor space; or (2) It may be part outdoor space and part indoor space; for example, an outdoor tennis court, and indoor recreation room; or (3) It may be all public or common space; or (4) It may be part common space and part private; for example, it could be an outdoor tennis court, indoor recreation room and balconies on each unit; and (5) Where balconies are added to units, the balconies shall not be less than 48 square feet. A minimum of 200 square feet per unit for two bedroom units is required. Shared outdoor space shall also be provided for the existing house as it is part of the multi-family complex, though the number of bedrooms for this dwelling was not provided. Assuming all units to be two-bedroom, the minimum requirement for shared outdoor space would be 1000 square feet. The applicant has stated in his letter of February 18, 2000, that there is 1,000 square feet of shared outdoor space shown on the plans along the front of the three attached units. The shared outdoor recreational space is all outdoor space. Staff calculated approximately 700 square feet of usable outdoor recreational space in this area (bark-dust/landscaped areas do not qualify as usable recreational space). Therefore, this criteria is not met. c. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety; The shared outdoor recreational space is readily observable to promote crime prevention as the windows from each unit face directly onto the patios. It is recommended that a split rail fence be used for screening where possible to further promote crime prevention. FINDING: This standard is not met as the area proposed for shared outdoor recreation has only approximately 700 square feet of usable outdoor recreational space, which is below the minimum required for the number of units and number of bedrooms per unit on this site. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house, and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom, the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. Private outdoor areas are defined by patios at the rear of each new dwelling unit. The parking lot which fronts Coral Street is a semi-private area, however, it may invite crime due to a lack of lighting, and openness to the street. Also the area between Proposed Unit #4 and #1 is a "indefensible space", vulnerable to crime, due to lack of lighting and visibility. Lighting is addressed under Section 18.765.040.L and Section 18.360.090.A.10 below. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this criteria, the following condition shall be met: CONDITION:The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas, semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention, and to establish maintenance responsibility in accordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 30 OF 39 Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes be located to prevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located on the front and rear elevations of the new units. Mailboxes are located at the street frontage in front of the subject site. The trash enclosure is located on the central eastern edge of the site along the parking lot (however, it shall be moved from this location in the buffer area). Interior laundry service area is not indicated in the plans. The Police Department has provided comments with regard to lighting for the site. Proposed wall mounted lighting on the individual units is not adequate for crime prevention and safety. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to satisfy this criterion, the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime prevention between Proposed Units #4 and #1, and in the parking lot at lighting levels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends `ground type lighting between Units #1 and #4, and some additional lighting for the roposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or roposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (11) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site fronts Coral Street which is a local street. The closest access to public transit is off of Greenburg Road to the immediate west of Coral Street. FINDING: As the site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed transit route, no transit facilities are required. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. • In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 6 and 7 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and a minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The minimum landscape percentage is addressed under Chapter 18.510 in this decision, and exceeds the minimum 20% gross area for landscaping required. FINDING: This standard is met. Drainage: Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This criterion is addressed under Street and Utility Improvements, Section 18.810.100.A and D in this decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 31 OF 39 Provision for the disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. The requirement for accessible parking spaces for parking lots between 1-25 parking spaces is 1 accessible parking space. Accessible p arking spaces shall be at least nine feet wide and shall have an adjacent access aisle, located the passenger side that is at least six feet wide (except that two adjacent accessible parking spaces may share a common access aisle). In addition, one in every eight accessible spaces, but not less than one shall be van accessible which is at least nine feet wide with an adjacent access aisle of at least eight feet wide. The applicant proposes no accessible stalls. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following conditions: CONDITIONS: The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. Prior to final building inspection, a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space, shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible" parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked "Van Accessible" mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards, and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. D. VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS: CHAPTER 18.370 Type I Adjustment: Section 18.370.020.C.7 Adjustments to setbacks to reduce tree removal (Chapter 18.790). By means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, the Director may grant a modification from applicable setback requirements of this Code for the purpose of preserving a tree or trees on the site of proposed development. Such modification may reduce the required setback by up to 50%, but shall not be more than is necessary for the preservation of trees on the site. The setback modification described in this section shall supersede any special setback requirements or exceptions set out elsewhere in this title, including but not limited to Chapter 18.730, except Section 18.730.040. The applicant has requested a rear yard (north) setback reduction from 20 feet to either 10 or 16 feet, and a side yard setback reduction from ten (10') feet to eight (8') feet (at Proposed Unit #1 only). These setback reductions are requested to reduce tree removal on the subject site. Specifically, the applicant proposes to preserve a 42" Conifer located in front of Proposed Unit #2 in a recessed area cut into the building footprint design. This request is consistent with the approval criteria for Site Development Review in Section 18.360.090.A.2. which requires that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, and that trees shall be preserve to the extent possible. Granting this request is also consistent with Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The applicant also proposes to preserve eight of the nine trees located on the site. The one tree shown not to be preserved is a 10" Black Walnut located on the north property line. A setback reduction to 16 feet is a reasonable compromise to preserve the large Conifer, and yet provide adequate setback and buffering between this property and the property to the north. The north property line abuts the rear yard of an existing single-family residence located roughly 100 feet north and zoned R-12. A ten (10') foot setback in the rear yard is problematic because the concrete patio attached to Unit #2 would then only be one-foot from the property line, providing virtually no buffer area. Even as proposed on the plans currently with a 16-foot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 32 OF 39 setback in the rear yard, the patio encroaches one-foot into the eight (8') foot buffer area. The patio satisfies the requirement for private outdoor space under Section 18.360.090.A.6. However, a 10-foot setback in the rear would allow only a two foot deep patio with an eight (8) foot buffer area. If greater space is need for the tree, the recess in the unit itself could be widened and designed around the tree. The west side yard setback reduction to eight (8') feet is justified only adjacent to Proposed Unit #1 to preserve the 42" Conifer tree. The setback reduction is adjacent to the rear yard of an existing single-family residence zoned R-12. There are no windows proposed for the west elevation of Proposed Unit #1, so privacy will be preserved for the adjacent property owner. The property owner to the west has objected to the granting of the adjustment. FINDING: The standard is met for a 20% reduction from 20 to 16 feet in the rear yard setback, but not for a 50% reduction. The standard is also met for a 20% reduction in the west side yard setback from 10 to eight (8') feet only adjacent to Proposed Unit #1. E. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant submitted a brief impact study. The following excerpt is taken from the applicant's study: NOISE IMPACT: The property is zoned R-12. The 20-40 Plan will increase the R-12 zoned area in this location. The downhill neighbor to the East would like to see (2) trees added and 6' arborvitae @ 2'-6" o/c used to help buffer noise and privacy. The neighbor to the North did not show up at the neighborhood meeting. The neighbor to the West, Mrs. Hanson, does not object to the proposal as I personally stopped and visited her. I am proposing an upscale two- bedroom unit in hope of attracting professional and mature tenants. The interview and selection of tenants should also help in controlling noise; since noise is more of behavioral thing in bedroom communities. Noise will be mitigated and the impact very minimal due to the size and nature of the development. PARKS SYSTEMS: The property, when fully occupied should add about eleven people to a population of 37,000. This is not a negative impact in any way. Besides a positive impact will be the systems development fee charged for this project which will benefit the public. WATER SYSTEM: Coral Street has a 6" dia. main and no improvements are necessary. The entire TVWD Metzger Division operates at approximately 3 million gallons per day in the winter and about 6 million gallons per day in the summer. The existing dwelling consumes an average of 200 to 250 gallons per day, which is a good indication of the consumption for each of the other 4 units. The water comes from Bull Run and is purchased from the Portland Water Bureau. Obviously supply, demand and added infrastructure set the price of water which is shared by all. SEWER SYSTEM: Coral Street has an 8" dia. sewer line running towards the east. There will be a hook-up charge, which is used for future improvements and a monthly bill for services. The hook-up fees mitigate the impact and 4 units into an 8" dia. line is not a problem and no improvements are necessary. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: This site imperious area of 11,115 sq. ft. will be connected to an onsite detention basin. The outflow and overflow will be connected to a 12" CSP, which heads east on Coral Street. The area is very small compared to the overall drainage basin however, the detention basin will mitigate peak flow for this site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 33 OF 39 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: Regarding bikeways — Coral Street is a small residential access street; however, the street has a 60' right-of-way. Just 516' to the west is Greenburg Road where bikeways exist. Regarding traffic, the existing dwelling normally has 1 vehicle in the driveway; per the parking standard six vehicles would exist for the four new units for a total of seven vehicles. With 1 to 2 round trips per day on a 60' right-of-way street normally headed west 516 feet to Greenburg Road a major arterial. Thus, the traffic will pass by only three residents. This is very little traffic distance and impact to the neighborhood and with Coral Street paved approximately 34' wide the street is adequate to carry the additional traffic adequately. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS According to the Washington County TIF ordinance, 32 percent of a projects impacts are met by its TIF assessment in Tigard. This leaves 68% percent unmitigated. The actual cost of system improvements per trip generated by new development on the Tigard street system can be determined by the following equation (Larson, Mackenzie Engineering, Dolan Findings, June 1995): $213 divided by .32 equals $665.6 ($213 is the residential use trip rate per trip TIF assessment according to the Washington County TIF ordinance effective July 1, 2000). According to the ITE manual figures and the TIF ordinance, this use would best be classified as low-rise apartment for the new dwelling units which generates 6.60 average weekday trips per dwelling unit per day. As there are four (4) new dwelling units proposed, 26.4 trips are generated per average weekday. For the existing single-family detached house, the weekday trip rate is 10. Therefore, the total number of trips generated for this development is 36.4 vehicle trips per day. Credits for mitigated costs The applicant is required to construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the site frontage. The frontage is approximately 106 feet in length. Coral Street is a local street and all of the main utilities are in. Therefore, it is estimated that the cost of the half-street improvement is about $150 per lineal foot ($150 x 106), or roughly $15,900. The applicant is entitled to a credit for the cost of the half-street improvement. Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts Full Impact $36.4 x 665.6= $24,228 Less TIF Assessment $36.4 x $213= $7,753 Less Cost of Improvements $150 x 106= 15,900 Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts $575 FINDING: Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the unmitigated impacts are roughly equivalent to the full impact (though numerically slightly less), therefore, the conditions imposed are roughly proportional and justified. G. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 34 OF 39 Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local commercial industrial street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Coral Street, which is classified as a local commercial industrial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 50 feet of ROW on this street, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No further ROW dedications are necessary. SW Coral Street is currently paved, but not fully improved to meet City standards. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement adjacent to the frontage of the site. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement as a part of their project. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvements on SW Coral Street, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line located in SW Coral Street that has capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates that they will serve all buildings on the site from one 4-inch sewer service lateral. This concept is acceptable to Staff. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This plan will accommodate any upstream runoff that flows toward and/or through this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\vAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 35 OF 39 • including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide onsite detention via a vegetated swale. The applicant provided preliminary calculations of the detention volume needed. The onsite swale will have sufficient capacity for detention. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. A bikeway is located along Greenburg Road, just west of Coral Street and within close proximity to this site. No additional bikeways are identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan. Therefore, no additional bikeway extension is required for this development. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Not applicable. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Not applicable. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\vAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 36 OF 39 would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 106 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,915.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service boundary. There is an existing public water line located in SW Coral Street that can sufficiently serve this site. The existing house on the site is already served. Prior to construction, the applicant must obtain final plan approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan and narrative show that the onsite swale will also function for treatment of the storm water. This concept is acceptable to Staff. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan is required to be a part of the public improvement plan submittal to the Engineering Department. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000031VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 37 OF 39 For multi-tenant buildings and projects, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this project will contain one multi-tenant building with three units and one new detached single-family unit, in addition to the existing single-family detached house. For this project, the addressing fee will be $120.00 (4 new units X $30/address = $120.00). SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS City of Tigard Long-Range Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. May require two hydrants. 2. Doesn't comply with Fire Dept access radius, 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1. The plans proposed no lighting schemes. Noted on a response dated February 25, 2000 indicates "sufficient lights will be attached to the units for visual awareness at dark." This office needs clarification of lighting methods. Is this lighting purely at the discretion of the rental unit? 2. On 7/24/2000 further comments were received as follows: Recommend "ground type lighting between Units #1 and #4, and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable (for the site) provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained. City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: 1 . This is within the Tualatin Valley Water District. 2. Although the water quality swale is private it is recommended that a '/z" orifice be used and a larger pipe from 12' C.B. to drain inlet, instead of diameter. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) has reviewed this application and provided comments which are incorporated and addressed under Section 18.810 in this decision. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. Tri-Met was notified but no comments were provided. Unified Sewerage Agency was notified but no comments were provided. US West Communications has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. Tigard-Tualatin School District#23J was notified but no comments were provided. GTE was notified but no comments were provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 38 OF 39 PGE was notified but no comments were provided. NW Natural Gas was notified but no comments were provided. TCI Cable was notified but no comments were provided. SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 28, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 12, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 11, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. - � R-bd July 28, 2000 PR PARED BY: Karen Perl Fox DATE Associate Planner tam. July 28, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersth I DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-3dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00003\VAR2000-00008-RASMUSSEN PROJECT PAGE 39 OF 39 /Ry SEE L4NDECAPE PLAN +4 1. ape �(/.y/:�J\p\� //+O fliEET Ml .16 J I W , !PA % y•%'• !EE LADECAPE PLMI\ i7 O1 (LEFT M) 112••• •s •'�e • yX O yx 0 • 'O�• 1.,_ m Q pq . 1 I r7 II I 3'-I' I 1 I 0W 1 0 1 I I 6QQ / I I I 15 I I ; H--.-1 FI - NN 53II a - I m 1 I b 99 i I X qR I L-- ' j1 1 q ad j 7 Ifr- ;I �� ; C 1 yA j Ij n I / 1 1 = 1 1 iI� J 1 pY .p�\\\ it ' 13 pY ) •T Z /. O Il 10 ' t� VJ •1 +g p5 1045.1 , 5'SIDEWALK , • • - I �X . +,, - 1 /� 1 104ID' 10?1' V I 6 I _-_�4' / 1 VT 1e �1 Iq �& ",4 1_ V / 1 I IV.. 1 8 4 STALL 6 i i ��• CARPORT �o s 0 Z -a I I ` Z y / I ig O I `N7 .4 4 k - 4 t--' I Z i 1 v� I `5 g 1 w 4,-., I p ' •� spy y 5' 10'-0' 9 1 grE xr X( Q 7 III II 9 C `C �i O ijE: 1' )R --IL 1 g`- - ------4, p 6m. o D 1 d RAIN RAIN—j -Z r'v 4'•RAM T71 < .I Ce r - 1 v I I ___-_- I tP �- 1,1 tIC 1 0 1 II'-6' �1. X t\ / P / m I C _I O ^ y • \ m J ----1 \\ r H 1 p �.� 5'X 5'-0' 24'-0' 10'-0' 12' 1 g \\ / �� 1. I / :EXIST,a 4•• • \ 1 1 +0 L---�7' -- --we—'1R DRAM _ 1 / I �� 100D3' v my 1 1 < I + 4p 1 31'-3' fi'-,,,ll 1 ( 30 0 I 1) 1 X ,a m 1 I II � � � A 1`7!b "°� +•+3 I L UG.POLLF_R TO ',L �{ - 4'METER REAR WITS �• TrP' ------'Iii -T 1063' �' EX15T.O.IJ'•CSP.I NEW I2'.CSP. DETAIILENJY• b +Y 200 3m - j m m -- A MAIL60XE5 C ppC I 00000 ..m \ SEE DETAIL n2 73 1S m T R oe SEE SIDEWALK f CURS SW CORAL STREET 'k s n SEE DETAILS 120 4 125 1 n © 8'0 W/-005 SLOPE 8•o W/.005 SLOPE 5.W.CORAL ST. � (LOCAL) OF �'G AR SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 Cliv SITE PLAN RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map is not to scale) ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIII CITY of TIGARD 04oh, . 1� GE OOR�PHIC INf DR M�iION SYSTEM e VICINITY MAP Da ICED� , ir I] In SDR2000-00003 � VAR2000-00008 �� �� I , RASMUSSEN �I PROJECT illy J All IIIII � Mr BORDERS ST L i2 IAIIMI1I milim LEHMANN SITE 7 ST �I i ��I ��-; ❑ • m N CORAL ST I 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet / I 1 1 I i i 1 i I I 'll / ill I 1"=381 feet ( . A 6 City of Tigard ST Information on this map is for general location ony and . should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 silLnilOCUST _ (503)639-1171 11.111.1111 http:pwww.ci.tigsrd.w.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2000;Cr lmagic\MAGIC03.APR "EXHIBIT B" Kenneth Rasmussen SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 603 Larkspur Court RASMUSSEN PROJECT Sublimity, OR 97385 (full decision) M.E. and Ruth L. Newbrey do Mildred L. Rasmussen, Trustee 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, OR 97385 June A. Hansen 9395 SW Coral Street Portland, OR 97223 Larry and Donna Zimmerman 9335 SW Coral St. Tigard, OR 97223 Michael and Randy Fisher 9255 SW Coral St. Tigard, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIOARD Community iDeve(opment Shaping Better Community STATE DE OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tward, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Cheer Appropnae Box(s)Below,} ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008- RASMUSSEN PROJECT AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: E / rl AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type Kind of Notice) FOR: 17 I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearng,it applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[SJ of which is attached, mark=. hi I it "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B", • lull/28,200' an• .-•ositedip-)the nited States Mail on July 28,2000,postage prepaid. i (Person th- 'rz-•are• 'ot' e) / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of COot , 2000. ' - °F=iciwat.SEAL 1IOTA Y PUBIC-( YsH��,,s. CASPEq PUBNC-OREGON My Commission Expires: `�,/-1/?Zoa3 MY ioMM1SSI0N rp pI/RES M,Y f3 2003 r NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION RASMUSSEN PROJECT 4.1- 0 CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00003, Shaping tt cuty VARIANCE (VAR) 2000-00008 120 DAYS =912112000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT CASE NOS. Site Development Review (SDR) Type II SDR2000-00003 Variance (VAR) Type I Adjustment VAR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following: 1 . New construction of a tri-plex and one detached unit in a multi-family complex on a lot with one existing detached single-family house. 2. A Type I Adjustment to the north and west setbacks to reduce tree removal. APPLICANT: Kenneth A. Rasmussen OWNERS: Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Ct. 603 Larkspur Ct. Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Sublimity, Oregon 97385 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12: The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3, 050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S126DC, Tax Lot 3700. The project is on the west side of Coral Street between Greenburg Road and 92nd Avenue. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review is approved subject to certain conditions. A request for Type I Adjustment for a reduction to the rear yard setback to 16 feet, and the west side yard setback to eight feet to reduce tree removal, is APPROVED subject to certain conditions. The request to further reduce the rear yard setback to 10 feet is DENIED. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BF \/ALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 28, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 12, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST I I, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Perl Fox at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125-SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. t ` . .. y._ • W j ai .t�¢a te 11,11111 7 Ai y �vaav 1 Y^ yy�y I � 0 I r «, -at- • 11 fn r i� l .�� ..-A--' It z ; '' t RI! a 1 I i g!i i I' r I _1 CL - Ill _; cL I �i Q ; ''c i I , 8 H o i .l .1 I! l a it !Al /1FI } H bit ,\ i %1 A 01 1 I/ Ia _ = 1 1 w x Il R ,„ SW CORAL STREET t ii ©wre•.w oa xo'E , [ ,!=t.,a2, 1 S CORAL 15, I - C;ITY OF TIGARD SDR2000-00003 VAR2000-00008 SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map os not co scale) VICINITY MAP M J 1-_ I 1 h II/r,411 TS Erig o SDR2000-00003 ', - � VAR2000-00008 , Pt = RASMUSSEN lreA II3` PROJECT 411111r 11■111111. [2:420 1 _ 1 all TT 11111111•1 I ' :11111:•, LEHMANN I ti1■'..111 -1N st 1 Urn -J !�■I I ■M „1 LOCLEIT 7:—*''''<'''''''"•-s.- --rj F:1-1 --------\ i_ —j —I-- _41,, , .......:7:: nY i4Asmuss&U PRI,err t9-3 (pa lo f 4) 1S126DC-01002 1S126DC-04100 EXHIBIT B ANAST ANGELINE V CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 9355 SW LEHMAN 9900 SW 92ND PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 is 126DC-03300 1 S 126DC-03301 ATHERTON REALTY PARTNERSHIP CROFT Z RUTH 2100 S WOLF c/o GARRISON PETER DES PLAINES,IL 60018 6060 SW 68TH CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-04801 1 S 126DC-01200 BAKER JAMES& DAVIDSON H V L F MATHESON ROBERT T& 9665 SW 92ND BAKER DIANE R PORTLAND,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04800 1 S 126DC-03200 BAKER JAMES& ERICKSON 0 K&ARDIS R TRUSTEES MATHESON ROBERT T& 9350 SW LEHMAN ST BAKER DIANE R TIGARD,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04900 1 S 126DC-03800 BBH INVESTMENTS FISHER MICHAEL Q 9445 SW LOCUST 9255 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05502 is 126DC-03900 BOTORF VERNON D ST GAMMON LYNNE M&JERRY W 9160 SW CORAL 9225 SW CORAL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01201 1 S 126DC-00901 BOWMAN DIANE M GETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL 9705 SW 92ND AVE LUTHERAN CHURCH — TIGARD,OR 97223 9640 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S12600-01100 1 S 126DC-03600 BRAAM ELISABETH R TR HANSEN MELVIN L JUNE A 9315 SW LEHMAN ST 9395 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04200 1 S 126DC-02602 CHAVEZ ALFRED& HARDIN EDNA Q CORYELL ALICE 0&JACK W 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL 9900 SW 92ND BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S126DC-02700 1 S 126DC-05700 • CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 HARDIN EDNA Q 9900 SW 92ND 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1S126DC-05101 1S126DC-03000 HARRIS GREGORY E KNIGHT DANIEL J 9036 NW BENSON ST JOHNSON DEANNA JEAN PORTLAND,OR 97229 9314 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04000 1 S 126DC-01003 HEFFLER ROBERT ARNOLD LAYMAN DEBORAH J S TRUSTEE 9260 SW CORAL 3216 SW SCHOLLS FERRY CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1 S 126DC-01101 1 S 1260C-07800 HERBST BRANDON UJANA M LEHMANN SQUARE HOMEOWNERS 9245 SW LEHMAN ST ASSOCIATION TIGARD,OR 97223 19305 ROBIN CIR#55 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 126DC-04001 1 S 126 DC-05100 HOME ELMORE JR&FLORA M LOOS HARRY AND BEVERLY A 8775 SW LOCUST ST#9 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S-1260C-05800 1 S 126DC-06500 HUNT CLIFFORD AND BETTY J LUNDMARK ALBERT C&ELIZABETH A 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 1260C-02702 1 S 126DC-06600 HUNT WILLIAM TR LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S 126DC-02701 1 S 126DC-06700 HUNT WILLIAM TRUSTEE LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S126DC-01006 1S1260C-04400 JOYCE DON H MARTIN ROBERT CLARE 226 NW HERMOSA BLVD THELMA M PORTLAND,OR 97210 BY JO RENE M MOODHE 585 MADRONA LN SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 135AB-00900 1 S 126DC-05000 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MAURER GRANT D BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9385 SW LOCUST ST 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AB-00700 1 S 126DC-01102 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MILLER THOMAS M DOROTHY BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9745 SW 92ND AVE 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03500 1S1260C-03001 MORROW KENNETH C AUDREY PERRY STEPHEN WILLIAM AND 9411 SW CORAL LORINDA C PORTLAND,OR 97223 9885 SW 92ND PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03302 1 S 1260C-04701 MURRAY DOUGLAS J PHOENIX INNS LLC TILLIE A BY VIPS MOTOR INNS INC 9450 SW LEHMAN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126DC-05201 1 S 126DC-05501 NAWAS CLAUDIA A PIHAS J BRADLEY 9245 SW LOCUST 9180 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01902 1 S 126DC-07200 NEUNZERT MICHAEL E/CAROLINE B RICHARDS M DALE& 9221 SW LEHMAN ST ADAMS HEATHER M TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 126DC-03700 1 S 126DC-07500 NEWBREY M E&RUTH L RICHARDS M DALE& do RASMUSSEN MILDRED L TR ADAMS HEATHER M 603 SW LARKSPUR CT 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST SUBLIMITY,OR 97385 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02601 1 S 126DC-07100 NGUYEN KY V&MINH HANH T RICHARDS M.DALE& 9150 SW LEHMAN ADAMS HEATHER M PORTLAND,OR 97223 C/O 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1260C-04601 1S126DC-07400 O'DAY F BRIAN&SUSAN A RICHARDS M.DALE& 9970 SW GREEENBURG RD ADAMS HEATHER M. - TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-06800 1 S 1260C-07300 PARTITION PLAT 1997-124 OWNERS RICHARDS M.DALE& OF LOTS 1-3 ADAMS HEATHER M 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03002 1S 126DC-07700 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M.DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05900 1 S 126DC-07600 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M.DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 DC-01004 1 S 126DC-04500 ROTH JEFFREY A&BETTY A VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC 9445 SW LEHMANN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126DC-05202 1 S 126DC-05602 RUFF MICHAEL L JOYCE E WESTERN CREDIT SERVICES 12150 SW 124TH AVE Go BUOY TAMYRA TIGARD,OR 97223 9175 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05600 1 S 126 D C-03701 SCHARBROUGH DONALD ZIMMERMAN LARRY D&DONNA J JOYCE I 9335 SW CORAL ST 10050 SW 92ND TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01900 SIMELES TAZAN AND MY THANH KENNETH RASMUSSEN 9750 SW 92ND AVE 603 LARKSPUR COURT PORTLAND,OR 97223 SUBLIMITY OR 97385 1 S126DC-05200 THEONNES MARVIN L AND MARJORIE J TRUSTEES 10025 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01005 THOMAS HARRY 1783 NW 143RD AVE UNIT#17 PORTLAND,OR 97229 S 126DC-07900 T RD C OF 131 HALL - ARD, 97223 1S126DC-01001 TOBEY MARSHA L 9335 SW LEHMAN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S126DC-03100 TYROFF JACK R ELLEN D 9330 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S1 26DC-02600 VERMILYE HOBART P JEAN S 11272 SW CAPITOL HWY PORTLAND,OR 97219 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Sue Rorman 1 1250 SW 82nd Avenue i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 7-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82od Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 1775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 06/06/00 11:59 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 11001 • *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 7093 CONNECTION TEL 503 612 7003 CONNECTION ID START TIME 06/06 11:56 USAGE TIME 02'28 PAGES 4 RESULT OK 44 CITY OF TIGARD -rte-It COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 91223 7l Number of pages including cover sheet: 4 I SATE June 6, 2000 TINE: TO: TVFR PHONE FAN: 612-7003 FROM Shirley Treat PONE (503) 639-4171 City of Tigard FMC (503)684-7297 Planning Department BE SDR2000-00003/RASMUSSEN PROJECT .. .. • r al__ £_rr_...__ as _ _ • A:.+a: CITY OF TIGARD SfiapingA detterCommunity COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OREGON 9/223 FAX COVER SHEET II Number of pages including cover sheet: 4 DATE: June 6, 2000 TIME: TO: TVFR PHONE: FAX: 612-7003 FROM: Shirley Treat PHONE: (503) 639-4171 City of Tigard FAX: (503) 684-7297 Planning Department RE: SDR2000-00003/RASMUSSEN PROJECT Nothing had been checked on the first page of the following three pages indicating you had seen and reviewed this information so I want to verify with your office if indeed you had received this information. Please give me a call if you have any questions at (503) 639-4171, extension 419. Thank you. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development 5fiapingA Better Community DATE: June 2,2000 TO: Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue Fire Marshall FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone: 15031 639-4171/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00003/VARIANCE(VAR)2000-00008 .- RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease provide the following information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: Phone Number(s): CITY Of LIO•RII 4—A4.tn 4041111061 Y PIEO—II v 1063' ;4 Ala M► 411► As • d. r.lo.. Willirrommilms...mg I ii i ....,, . r........, , , ., . Li , q ,, IA I ', . I...„,........,„,lie..�, e 0 3 "tb. W' . > 1 ilk ' .:,:nti ...- .r....-. ...t...sg--.::::--.::::_ .--, . 1 a V' � i Z 1,..4 .r ; ,� ce g .1 • i ___)ari l � . Q 1 I 0_i: El i . 41. < ,I i ......mi . I CL--1 4 t 1 . A 4 --Arai LL r `' f' , i _.'.=0 • I imr: W-- • 1 iii=.. . ,H1 N. .a i11 air Lri 1 i714 OM RLYI M.M aY 6n T1 I.45QL.— . RIr SW CORAL STREET (LOCAL) ClivOF TIGARD + SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map is not to scale) CITY of TIGARD QC I.O ,� OE OORAPNIO IN FORYIITION BYaYFM B: - ICIITP o ,CED ;EST ST11:1111111 =j1 III Q� SDR2000-00003 II 'I;� ; VAR2000-00008 1110 � RASMUSSEN 141 :1 , PROJECT , pm 91ST low --,,,, ,,. ■à ! DIIIIU ERS ST §90111� 11 C� LEHMANN 11111II SITE ST I. ---L)---\ —i z N m CORAL 111 ST 0 100 200 300 100 500 Feet I i (1 1"4 381 feet __. + LOCUST - City of Tigard ST �� \ Information on this map Is for general location only and A . I I should be verified with the Development Services Division. 7 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd ' r VYJ Tigard,OR 97223, .. \ W / (503)639-1171 r „ !/ hltp:/iwww.ci.tipard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2000;C:Imagic\MAGIC03.APR 4... • I. Y __ IIRE LANDSCAPE PLAN\ /4 •-.-- roam-sa, —_..., ___ I 4 T+ . LA , _. # it :1 , . . .. . . NEE LANDOCAP7LAY\ :■• q ' g lSASET 1/2 *. 11.• r . •6 ti. 1.1., '....-'--..--*'--....-..---‘---..'.....--'1 °g 81 , I I I 5 I I I I I I I ' HI 4 if i I filli 4'4 , i. ,lir I 11 Lo. ,i1 -oi 0342 ' =, PI Il 4• , ,„ 06' ii: . . 11 1 q 11: /11 !pi : : ; 1 q 11 IlL - o a 1 41 i z ------------ —J-I k +g -2,3 - ,h0 ■:'-i• ilk= -„,-r __I i - -0 \ t /6_7„21..-±„.. oi kar)--e•-• Z 1 R 6 , V % . , •. /g e. 1 0 I , • 4- 0 1-1- y 30' 30'0' •' .. I - . ..e u) ___, Pia .: ,.1.:„:„....„--:- . 5.sioEtuALK .• • ----r .. 4 . 1 4 : •-dti 4: 1-, ‘ ,, ...---- .....„.....--- I04.0' '' 102b1 ' .'"11 - -.- -----________-- --- / + x T .0 in CD 6-1 ./ 1 • n - CAR0ORT Z .4 ., % x ■I roe a• g I ilt 1,.,..,./: ZN 1 os ,..-- 3••TYP. ':v, 4'r RAN DRAIN 4p k,/ _,,( 1 CI I 1 -- ,„ ....--- RAIN DRAIN---1• •..1\ I it......./ +4 1•. .4 : ./ 1 i < 1 i 0 I , 1 r_______ _IT\....:. , ,___.•11,..:.. LANDSCAPE F--%s5. EI 41 1 / 1 M I I i I Z.- s,. I 1 I 1 I; ..• .. 7 • to 10 /1 I 2: I 11 I 1 1: m 11 I • I . • 11 k% .. V ___,,, de 't se 1 / 0 - I G■ — Lim 1 , II'-e' !,1, ,, X is ../ / hl 1 I I 0 .. 0:: \ .. I / mu I I m )g, 1 0 rt 1 I. ...---..I ■ \ \ _,1/4 / -DI I F i m 1 I , ......-- 6*-3' •.■ 1 0 S'‘ IS'-0' 240' , / 0-0' c 12' I A ,Zy . 1 b. ,• . \ d-u" . . . / 71. ___J.,.. 0 1 . 1 DOOM 44 • ‘ I 5 : ,..,--- 21.41.4 MAR 1 : +F. .7.--,7 100D3* ID I a - i g: 7#1,t- 11' 1 g 31' 1 • -3' 0 m .,„ .'-.-....... 6• ; f 1 1 [4,1, M .1111 b UC..POWER TO . • ETER REAR UNITS __—--....i■ --—--—.■---11-•-7/ 111,56773=1--—--—---.g A 4::',"' EXIST'G.12'r CSP. NEW 12'4,C.51. SEE DRIvEWAT hl kr 2Q ;1 _.._.._3.,-,---a-,--,&..—..—..—..—..—..— E—.._ _41,___.._'..—DETAIL 142—• —+, 2,4 MAILBOXES g / 7171--(,:l fe• 7, 017000 .m SEE DETAIL n2 A T L4 SEE SIDELUALK 4 CURB ' q SEE DETAILS 120 4 125 SW CORAL STREET_1% In > ar•W/.00S SLOPE s'o W/.005 SLOPE % S.W.CORAL S ) " ' (LOCAL) P,41) CITYOF TIGARD At SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 SITE PLAN N RASMUSSEN PROJECT (Map is not to scale) . 4,,, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Selow) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2000-00003/VAR2000-00008 - RASMUSSEN PROJECT E AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: i / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) City of Tigard Planning Director il Tigard Hearings Officer • Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:, _ I 7 AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) O City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council E NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: I I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked hibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit' ,on June 2,2000 a • dep•:ited in e United States Mail on June 2,2000, postage prepaid. 7 er7L ( e) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I q day of c..t (y , 2000. �;=! OFFICIAL SEAL N I t ' ' I I I I SHERMAN S.ChSPER My Commission Expires: �41 /3 ZOU.3 Y; "/ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON J COMMISSION NO.323409 MY COMMISSION BMW '''± 13 2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXH THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: June 2, 2000 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR)2000-00003 VARIANCE (VAR)2000-00008 FILE NAME: RASMUSSEN PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. ZONE: R-12; Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 16, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 14, 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the L s for an appeal to the Tigard Plant Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." \y VICNITY MAP= Pi SDR2000.000U3 ( ' _ VAR2000 00008 .11111111F ��`' RASjUSSEN j �� I - PROJECT 111111 me bilk ���� _111_ Nib.ZII!1n sum =1110 1111119:111:11‘1111111 1 ■ .1111 • 11■1 MINION MINIM 1- 1111111111. ■11� 1.1I Ci . I I I I = _ . \ � •Iel date Jun 1,2000.G yOpKVAAGIC03 APR EXHIBIT B 1S126DC-01002 1S126DC-04100 ANAST ANGELINE V CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 9355 SW LEHMAN 9900 SW 92ND PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03300 1S126DC-03301 ATHERTON REALTY PARTNERSHIP CROFT Z RUTH 2100 S WOLF do GARRISON PETER DES PLAINES, IL 60018 6060 SW 68TH CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-04801 1 S 126 D C-01200 BAKER JAMES& DAVIDSON H V L F MATHESON ROBERT T& 9665 SW 92ND BAKER DIANE R PORTLAND,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04800 1 S 126DC-03200 BAKER JAMES& ERICKSON 0 K&ARDIS R TRUSTEES MATHESON ROBERT T& 9350 SW LEHMAN ST BAKER DIANE R TIGARD,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 126 DC-04900 1S1 26 DC-03800 BBH INVESTMENTS FISHER MICHAEL Q 9445 SW LOCUST 9255 SW CORAL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 DC-05502 1 S 126D C-03900 BOTORF VERNON D ST GAMMON LYNNE M&JERRY W 9160 SW CORAL 9225 SW CORAL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-01201 1 S 126 D C-00901 BOWMAN DIANE M GETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL 9705 SW 92ND AVE LUTHERAN CHURCH TIGARD,OR 97223 9640 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01100 1 S 126 DC-03600 BRAAM ELISABETH R TR HANSEN MELVIN L JUNE A 9315 SW LEHMAN ST 9395 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04200 1 S 126DC-02602 CHAVEZ ALFRED& HARDIN EDNA Q CORYELL ALICE 0&JACK W 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL 9900 SW 92ND BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-02700 1 S 126 D C-05700 CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 HARDIN EDNA Q 9900 SW 92ND 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1 S 126DC-05101 1 S 126DC-03000 HARRIS GREGORY E KNIGHT DANIEL J 9036 NW BENSON ST JOHNSON DEANNA JEAN PORTLAND,OR 97229 9314 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04000 1 S 126DC-01003 HEFFLER ROBERT ARNOLD LAYMAN DEBORAH J S TRUSTEE 9260 SW CORAL 3216 SW SCHOLLS FERRY CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1 S 126DC-01 101 1312600-07800 HERBST BRANDON L/JANA M LEHMANN SQUARE HOMEOWNERS 9245 SW LEHMAN ST ASSOCIATION TIGARD, OR 97223 19305 ROBIN CIR#55 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 126DC-04001 1 S 126DC-05100 HOME ELMORE JR& FLORA M LOOS HARRY AND BEVERLY A 8775 SW LOCUST ST#9 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-05800 1 S 126 D C-06500 HUNT CLIFFORD AND BETTY J LUNDMARK ALBERT C&ELIZABETH A 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 126DC-02702 1 S 126DC-06600 HUNT WILLIAM TR LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND, OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S 126 D C-02701 1 S 126 DC-06700 HUNT WILLIAM TRUSTEE LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND, OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S 126DC-01006 1 S 126DC-04400 JOYCE DON H MARTIN ROBERT CLARE 226 NW HERMOSA BLVD THELMA M PORTLAND,OR 97210 BY JO RENE M MOODHE 585 MADRONA LN SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1S1 35AB-00900 151 26 D C-05000 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MAURER GRANT D BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9385 SW LOCUST ST 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AB-00700 1 S 126DC-01102 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MILLER THOMAS M DOROTHY BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9745 SW 92ND AVE 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126D C-03500 1 S 126DC-03001 MORROW KENNETH C AUDREY PERRY STEPHEN WILLIAM AND 9411 SW CORAL LORINDA C PORTLAND,OR 97223 9885 SW 92ND PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03302 1 S 126DC-04701 MURRAY DOUGLAS J PHOENIX INNS LLC TILLIE A BY VIPS MOTOR INNS INC 9450 SW LEHMAN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND, OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126 DC-05201 1 S 126 D C-05501 NAWAS CLAUDIA A PIHAS J BRADLEY 9245 SW LOCUST 9180 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-01902 1 S 126DC-07200 NEUNZERT MICHAEL E/CAROLINE B RICHARDS M DALE& 9221 SW LEHMAN ST ADAMS HEATHER M TIGARD, OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126D C-03700 1S1 26 D C-07500 NEWBREY M E& RUTH L RICHARDS M DALE& c/o RASMUSSEN MILDRED L TR ADAMS HEATHER M 603 SW LARKSPUR CT 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST SUBLIMITY,OR 97385 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02601 1 S 126DC-07100 NGUYEN KY V&MINH HANH T RICHARDS M. DALE& 9150 SW LEHMAN ADAMS HEATHER M PORTLAND, OR 97223 C/O 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-04601 1 S 126DC-07400 O'DAY F BRIAN&SUSAN A RICHARDS M. DALE& 9970 SW GREEENBURG RD ADAMS HEATHER M. TIGARD, OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126D C-06800 1 S 126D C-07300 PARTITION PLAT 1997-124 OWNERS RICHARDS M. DALE& OF LOTS 1-3 ADAMS HEATHER M 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-03002 1 S 126 D C-07700 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M. DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S126DC-05900 1 S126DC-07600 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M. DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-01004 1 S 126 DC-04500 ROTH JEFFREY A&BETTY A VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC 9445 SW LEHMANN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126DC-05202 1 S 126 D C-05602 RUFF MICHAEL L JOYCE E WESTERN CREDIT SERVICES 12150 SW 124TH AVE c/o BUOY TAMYRA TIGARD,OR 97223 9175 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05600 1 S 126DC-03701 SCHARBROUGH DONALD ZIMMERMAN LARRY D&DONNA J JOYCE I 9335 SW CORAL ST 10050 SW 92ND TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01900 SIMELES TAZAN AND MY THANH 9750 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126 DC-05200 THEONNES MARVIN L AND MARJORIE J TRUSTEES 10025 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 151 26DC-01005 THOMAS HARRY 1783 NW 143RD AVE UNIT#17 PORTLAND, OR 97229 151 26 D C-07900 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01001 TOBEY MARSHA L 9335 SW LEHMAN ST TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S126DC-03100 TYROFF JACK R ELLEN D 9330 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-02600 VERMILYE HOBART P JEAN S 11272 SW CAPITOL HWY PORTLAND, OR 97219 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78`h Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91223 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82°d Avenue i:lcurpinlsetup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 12-Apr-00 Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109`h Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 N. . ___ _ C9'.-t---1 T CITY of TIGARD !4 L\ � GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VVV -,' �, _ Q y AREA NOTIFIED 111101 m( 500') i. 1 le - BORDERS 6 _. _ g:, .. . lslz6o5o12aa ,I ! Att80C00901 101260001201 FOR: RASMUSSEN PROJECT \� C . A1zs0cerzo0 �151260C 0117 05074006 160501100 .... 101781507300 '0'16°°°"O2 15'260501900 RE: TL # I S 126DC 03700 ry� 151260501003 Alxsocotlol 157160001004 151760501002 51260501100 151760001G00 1 ))%r 21s1260001006 151260001800 151260501500 1 I 131160501107 51260501902 I LEHMANN . CO - , ,'�� :,)'' / I i 1012 05900 ! Property owner information 7�\" 15560503002 I is valid for 3 months from 151160503302 101x60503100 1E1260502600 A126000aa01 151260503000 / \ the date printed on this map. 4 IQ - 0 151260502501 '14�J 15716°50320 151260505700 `\ ., 151260503300 13119000aD01 151160002602 F�J ` -Q 15116050360 Z 151260001700 151160503500 �i 0371 151160503800 I N \`\\`\\\\\;1160 5 0 3 70 1 ...N.4,) �`\\\ 151160503909 260502701 ‘.....___ . . .. __ ♦ n1260005800 191260502762 • ... CORAL 1s726oe04eQ1 101260504000 I j il 101260004400 A11500040D1 A1260c60200 151260504100 163260504500 1312fi0005501 107160505502 I( I 151260506100 -------T I ___ 101200005200 / l / 1s126000660o 151260005600 N �151260004707 75yte0C04800 101761504900 131260505100 151160 C05t01 1012605051011 01260506100 101z6DC04801 151260505000 1S1t60006800 , 151260505401 15126050560* -— 1S1160006500 I 0 100 30 200 0 Feet LOCUST 1"z 247 feet 151356000900 Al. i II 101356000100 ' • City of Tigard Information on This map is for general location only and _ I should Be verified with the Development Services Division. _ - 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 1 (503)639-4171 .! A http:l/www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jun 2,2000;C:lrnagic1MAGIC03.APR • 1S126DC-01002 1S126DC-04100 ANAST ANGELINE V CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 9355 SW LEHMAN 9900 SW 92ND PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03300 1 S 126DC-03301 ATHERTON REALTY PARTNERSHIP CROFT Z RUTH 2100 S WOLF do GARRISON PETER DES PLAINES,IL 60018 6060 SW 68TH CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04801 1 S 126DC-01200 BAKER JAMES& DAVIDSON H V L F MATHESON ROBERT T& 9665 SW 92ND BAKER DIANE R PORTLAND,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04800 1 S 126DC-03200 BAKER JAMES& ERICKSON 0 K&ARDIS R TRUSTEES MATHESON ROBERT T& 9350 SW LEHMAN ST BAKER DIANE R TIGARD,OR 97223 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04900 1 S 126DC-03800 BBH INVESTMENTS FISHER MICHAEL Q 9445 SW LOCUST 9255 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05502 1 S 126DC-03900 BOTORF VERNON D ST GAMMON LYNNE M&JERRY W 9160 SW CORAL 9225 SW CORAL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-01201 1 S126DC-00901 BOWMAN DIANE M GETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL 9705 SW 92ND AVE LUTHERAN CHURCH - TIGARD,OR 97223 9640 SW GREENBURG RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 15126DC-01100 1 S 126DC-03600 BRAAM ELISABETH R TR HANSEN MELVIN L JUNE A 9315 SW LEHMAN ST 9395 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S1 26DC-04200 1S1 26DC-02602 CHAVEZ ALFRED& HARDIN EDNA Q CORYELL ALICE 0&JACK W 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL 9900 SW 92ND BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02700 15126DC-05700 CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 HARDIN EDNA Q 9900 SW 92ND 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1S126DC-05101 1S1260C-03000 HARRIS GREGORY E KNIGHT DANIEL J 9036 NW BENSON ST JOHNSON DEANNA JEAN PORTLAND,OR 97229 9314 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S126DC-04000 1 S126DC-01003 HEFFLER ROBERT ARNOLD LAYMAN DEBORAH J S TRUSTEE 9260 SW CORAL 3216 SW SCHOLLS FERRY CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1 S 126DC-01101 1 S 126DC-07800 HERBST BRANDON UJANA M LEHMANN SQUARE HOMEOWNERS 9245 SW LEHMAN ST ASSOCIATION TIGARD,OR 97223 19305 ROBIN CIR#55 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 126DC-04001 1 S 126DC-05100 HOME ELMORE JR&FLORA M LOOS HARRY AND BEVERLY A 8775 SW LOCUST ST#9 9365 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15126DC-05800 is 126DC-06500 HUNT CLIFFORD AND BETTY J LUNDMARK ALBERT C&ELIZABETH A 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 126OC-02702 1 S 126 DC-06600 HUNT WILLIAM TR LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S 126DC-02701 1 S 126DC-06700 HUNT WILLIAM TRUSTEE LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 3381 COEUR D'ALENE-DR PORTLAND,OR 97229 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1 S 1260C-01006 1 S 126DC-04400 JOYCE DON H MARTIN ROBERT CLARE 226 NW HERMOSA BLVD THELMA M PORTLAND,OR 97210 BY JO RENE M MOODHE 585 MADRONA LN SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 135AB-00900 1 S 126DC-05000 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MAURER GRANT D BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9385 SW LOCUST ST 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AB-00700 1 S 126DC-01102 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV MILLER THOMAS M DOROTHY BY NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON 9745 SW 92ND AVE 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03500 1S126DC-03001 MORROW KENNETH C AUDREY PERRY STEPHEN WILLIAM AND 9411 SW CORAL LORINDA C PORTLAND,OR 97223 9885 SW 92ND PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03302 1 S 126DC-04701 MURRAY DOUGLAS J PHOENIX INNS LLC TILLIE A BY VIPS MOTOR INNS INC 9450 SW LEHMAN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126DC-05201 1 S 126DC-05501 NAWAS CLAUDIA A PIHAS J BRADLEY 9245 SW LOCUST 9180 SW CORAL TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01902 1 S 126DC-07200 NEUNZERT MICHAEL E/CAROLINE B RICHARDS M DALE& 9221 SW LEHMAN ST ADAMS HEATHER M TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03700 1 S 126DC-07500 NEWBREY M E&RUTH L RICHARDS M DALE& do RASMUSSEN MILDRED L TR ADAMS HEATHER M 603 SW LARKSPUR CT 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST SUBLIMITY,OR 97385 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02601 1 S 126DC-07100 NGUYEN KY V&MINH HANH T RICHARDS M.DALE& 9150 SW LEHMAN ADAMS HEATHER M PORTLAND,OR 97223 C/O 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S1260C-04601 1 S 126DC-07400 O'DAY F BRIAN&SUSAN A RICHARDS M.DALE& 9970 SW GREEE■BURG RD ADAMS HEATHER M. - TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-06800 15126DC-07300 PARTITION PLAT 1997-124 OWNERS RICHARDS M.DALE& OF LOTS 1-3 ADAMS HEATHER M 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03002 1 S 126DC-07700 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M.DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-05900 1 S 126DC-07600 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M RICHARDS M.DALE& 9250 SW LEHMANN ST ADAMS HEATHER M. PORTLAND,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126D C-01004 1 S 1260C-04500 ROTH JEFFREY A&BETTY A VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC 9445 SW LEHMANN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1 S 126 DC-05202 1S1 26DC-05602 RUFF MICHAEL L JOYCE E WESTERN CREDIT SERVICES 12150 SW 124TH AVE do BUOY TAMYRA TIGARD,OR 97223 9175 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 DC-05600 1 S 126 D C-03701 SCHARBROUGH DONALD ZIMMERMAN LARRY D&DONNA J JOYCE I 9335 SW CORAL ST 10050 SW 92ND TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126 DC-01900 SIMELES TAZAN AND MY THANH 9750 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-05200 THEONNES MARVIN L AND MARJORIE J TRUSTEES 10025 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-01005 THOMAS HARRY 1783 NW 143RD AVE UNIT#17 PORTLAND,OR 97229 is 126DC-07900 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL - TIGARD, OR 97223 1S126DC-01001 TOBEY MARSHA L 9335 SW LEHMAN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126 D C-03100 TYROFF JACK R ELLEN D 9330 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02600 VERMILYE HOBART P JEAN S 11272 SW CAPITOL HWY PORTLAND,OR 97219 NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE INDICATED ON THIS MAP . 1 CITY of TIGARD _ 9 1ST 1', GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM W Q >___ AREA NOTIF t (500' BORDERS .. - 151260001200 • /' 131260000901 --j 1512 6 0 0 012 01 ,5726°°672°° FOR: Ken Rathmussen 151260002100 161160001102 7577pC01900 ....."419171311C01005 151180°°]300 151760001003 151260 001001 11E: I S 126DC 3700 SUBJE HMV 151260001004 151160001002 131760001100 2 181260001600 SITE [/7 6°001006 151260007°00 1s128D001W1 151260001901 �r .1611600°7500 LEHMANN 1311:1 ,59017_.__ 131260005002 151260003302 151180003100 101260002600 / \ 151260003301 151260003600 151260003200 101160002601 F���J//— • '4 101160005100 ' 1512600026112 161760009300 \-- 101260003001 _ - ■ 15126000360 iii Z 151160002700 151760003500 151260003800 N eocoa 1 151260003900 1012600111701 1_ \ _ 1_ 161269005800 151260002702 CORAL 101260004601 157760004°00 , 151760004500 151260004400 1S1160004001 1s11s9co41oo 1012690e4100 151780004600 151760005501 151760004604 151260005502 _ _. 157160006700 .:,. - 15126000520o 1 • 151160006600 101260005600 N 151260004 ■ ,760004000 131760004900 151160005100 151.260005207 1 1S12B0004801 1012600050 10S0126DC°51"iS126DC05101 157760006600 ill'il'ill. 101760005201 101260005601 I li 131760006500 0 100 200 300 Feet -- _ LOCUST 1"=247 feet 411, 151356800000 ,4. I r, 1313591100/00 2. City of Tigard ! - .formation o •ap is for general location only and 6 • - shou•••vehfied vdth, sevelopment Services Division. -'- \ 13125 S, all Blvd Tigard,O' 97223 _ (503)• 1-4171 httpa, .ri.ligard.or.us Community Development - - - - •;Camagic\MAGIC03.APR 1S126DC-00901 1S126DC-01001 ETHSEMANE EVANGELICAL TOBEY MARSHA L 9640 SW GREENBURG RD 9335 SW LEHMAN ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-01002 1S126DC-01003 ANAST ANGELINE V LAYMAN DEBORAH J S TRUSTEE 9355 SW LEHMAN 3216 SW SCHOLLS FERRY CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 1S126DC-01004 15126DC-01005 ROTH JEFFREY A&BETTY A THOMAS HARRY 9445 SW LEHMANN 1783 NW 143RD AVE UNIT#17 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97229 1S126DC-01006 1S126DC-01100 JOYCE DON H BRAAM ELISABETH R TR 226 NW HERMOSA BLVD 9315 SW LEHMAN ST PORTLAND, OR 97210 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-01101 1S126DC-01102 HERBST BRANDON L/JANA M MILLER THOMAS M DOROTHY 9245 SW LEHMAN ST 9745 SW 92ND AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-01200 1S126DC-01201 DAVIDSON H V L F BOWMAN DIANE M 9665 SW 92ND 9705 SW 92ND AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-01900 1S126DC-01902 SIMELES TAZAN AND MY THANH NEUNZERT MICHAEL E/CAROLINE B 9750 SW 92ND AVE 9221 SW LEHMAN ST PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 126DC-02600 1 S 126DC-02601 VERMILYE HOBART P NGUYEN KY V&MINH HANH T 11272 SW CAPITOL HWY 9150 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND, OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S1 26DC-02602 1S1 26DC-02700 HARDIN EDNA Q CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL 9900 SW 92ND BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-02701 1 S 126DC-02702 HUNT WILLIAM TRUSTEE HUNT WILLIAM TR 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST PORTLAND, OR 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97229 1S126DC-03000 1S126DC-03001 KNIGHT DANIEL J PERRY STEPHEN WILLIAM AND 9314 SW LEHMAN 9885 SW 92ND PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03002 1S126DC-03100 PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M TYROFF JACK R ELLEN D 9250 SW LEHMANN ST 9330 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03200 1 S 126DC-03300 ERICKSON 0 K&ARDIS R TRUSTEES ATHERTON REALTY PARTNERSHIP 9350 SW LEHMAN ST 2100 S WOLF TIGARD,OR 97223 DES PLAINES, IL 60018 1 S 126DC-03301 1 S 126DC-03302 CROFT Z RUTH MURRAY DOUGLAS J 6060 SW 68TH CT 9450 SW LEHMAN PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03500 1S126DC-03600 MORROW KENNETH C AUDREY HANSEN MELVIN L JUNE A 9411 SW CORAL 9395 SW CORAL PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-03700 1S126DC-03701 NEWBREY M E&RUTH L ZIMMERMAN LARRY D&DONNA J 603 SW LARKSPUR CT 9335 SW CORAL ST SUBLIMITY, OR 97385 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-03800 1 S 126DC-03900 FISHER MICHAEL Q GAMMON LYNNE M&JERRY W 9255 SW CORAL 9225 SW CORAL ST TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-04000 1S126DC-04001 HEFFLER ROBERT ARNOLD HOME ELMORE JR&FLORA M 9260 SW CORAL 8775 SW LOCUST ST#9 PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-04100 1S126DC-04200 CORYELL JACK M ALICE 0 CHAVEZ ALFRED& 9900 SW 92ND 9900 SW 92ND PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-04400 1S126DC-04500 MARTIN ROBERT CLARE VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC 585 MADRONA LN 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 • • 1 S126DC-04600 1S126DC-04601 VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC O'DAY F BRIAN&SUSAN A 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD 9970 SW GREEENBURG RD WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 126DC-04602 1 S 126DC-04701 VIP'S MOTOR INNS INC PHOENIX INNS LLC 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD 29757 SW BOONES FERRY RD WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1S126DC-04800 1S126DC-04801 BAKER JAMES& BAKER JAMES& 9495 SW LOCUST#A 9495 SW LOCUST#A PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-04900 1S126DC-05000 BBH INVESTMENTS MAURER GRANT D 9445 SW LOCUST 9385 SW LOCUST ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-05100 1S126DC-05101 LOOS HARRY AND BEVERLY A HARRIS GREGORY E 9365 SW LOCUST ST 9036 NW BENSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97229 1S126DC-05200 1S126DC-05201 THEONNES MARVIN L AND NAWAS CLAUDIA A 10025 SW 92ND AVE 9245 SW LOCUST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15126DC-05202 1S126DC-05501 RUFF MICHAEL L JOYCE E PIHAS J BRADLEY 12150 SW 124TH AVE 9180 SW CORAL TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-05502 1S126DC-05600 BOTORF VERNON D ST SCHARBROUGH DONALD 9160 SW CORAL 10050 SW 92ND TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-05602 1S126DC-05700 WESTERN CREDIT SERVICES HARDIN EDNA Q 12655 SW CENTER ST#135 4806 SW WEMBLEY PL BEAVERTON,OR 97005 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1 S 126DC-05800 1 S 126DC-05900 HUNT CLIFFORD AND BETTY J PERRY CARL W AND GLORIA M 8038 NW HAZELTINE ST 9250 SW LEHMANN ST PORTLAND, OR 97229 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S126DC-06500 1S126DC-06600 LUNDMARK HOMES LLC LUNDMARK HOMES LLC 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR WEST LINN, OR 97038 WEST LINN,OR 97038 1S126DC-06700 1S126DC-06800 LUNDMARK HOMES LLC PARTITION PLAT 1997-124 OWNERS 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR 3381 COEUR D'ALENE DR WEST LINN,OR 97038 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1S126DC-07100 1S126DC-07200 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-07300 1S126DC-07400 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S126DC-07500 1S126DC-07600 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 26DC-07700 1S1 26DC-07800 WINDWOOD CONSTRUCTION INC LEHMANN SQUARE HOMEOWNERS 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 19305 ROBIN CIR#55 TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 1S126DC-07900 1S135AB-00700 TIGARD CITY OF KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV 13125 SW HALL 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AB-00900 KNICKERBOCKER PROP INC XXIV 10300 SW GREENBURG RD STE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97223 MODERN BUILDING SY - -, C. JOB 9493 Porter Rd. SE P.O. Box 110 A r SHEET NO. OF AUMSVILL �_� �w 1 • CALCULATED BY DATE Fax ' 49-4950 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE P A O ekk"I'61 - sib' G[ 3-7 S S LJ , coltA-t, Sr' �lCuW) , bill, coo its flaw . Cyr 037 o o r A' I S I Z (a D C- -3 X 0 0 ibL k APPLICANT MATERIALS r SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW " " A TYPE II APPLICATION —LW CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 RECEIVED PLANNING j,035 7, GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: JAN 2 0 2000 DATE OF PRE-APP.: 7( i Property Address/Location(s): 9375 SW Coral StreetOFTIGARD f FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 1 Si 126 DC TL3700 sOK p Case No.(s): 0,04, 0 ;. Other Case No.(s): 1/,4r1 .zvaa- voOc - Site Size: 106. 3 x 176. 10 y; 711 < (� Receipt No.:®o ' 3 a) Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Kenneth A. Rasmussen Date: / X5-o� Address: 603 SW Larkspur ( , Phone:( 503) 749-4949 CitySublimity Zip: 97385 Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Kenneth A. Rasmussen Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: 603 Larkspur Ct. Phone:wk 749-4949 //k/ City: Sublimity Zip: 97385 CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpinknasters\sdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY Q Application Form E Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site E Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): Develop site for four multi-family dwelling (#ofcolot Plan P g (#of copies based on pre-app check list) units with exisiting single-family dwelling 0- Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") unit to remain. The new units are single Er, Applicant's Statement story with approx. 900sq ft. of living space. (#of copies based on pre app checklist) ►i . Construction Cost Estimate - �l The present zoning is R-12 and is adequate IR USA Sewer Use Information Card for this development. Included is 8 parking (Distributed/completed at application submittal) stalls with(1) / 4-stall metal carport. 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped 1 P Legal Size Envelopes Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ , 8�LO0- ($100,00o-$ggg,ggg 1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) k�, $1.00 (+$5/$10,000) /6-0/60O f4.//dins (o5•!- SG, Ov 0 5i�e �•zj Jro L^ 3 i l ' L.st any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: j`l t'C 1 ca-no tJ ' \1j ck S€r cx tt !Di oFt h/IDDLE Ltd,r or '3‘.41-4r coiPl,ty c:,,t %ESISato1)-114:4-1 of 42-4 Co iFbA APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 11 day of Al-AUAllik , iti4c ,Cgt/V-0Z , ,e0f, — ner's Signature Owner's Signature K nneth A. Rasmussen Donald D. Rasmussen ( Ill . I / IP Owner's Signature Owner's Sig ature Darla R. Rasmussen Mildred L. Rasmus 2 . . • r ADJUSTMENT a. .•�!�i TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: 7(2 1 /c j GENERAL INFORMATION f Property Address/Location(s): 9375 SW Coral Street FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 151 26DC TL3700 Site Size: 1 0 6. 3 x 176. 10 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Kenneth A. Rasmussen Case No.(s): V/' Address: 603 SW Larkspur Ct. Phone: ( 503 ) 749-4949 Other Case No.(s): City: Sublimity Zip: 97385 Applicant*: Kenneth A. Rasmussen Receipt No.: Address: 603 SW Larkspur Ct. Phone: ( 503) 749-4949 Application Accepted By: City: Sublimity, Zip: 97385 Date: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Date Determined To Be Complete: must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Comp Plan/Zone Designation: PROPOSAL SUMMARY CIT Area: The owners of record of the subject property request permission for - an Administrative Adjustment to the following provision(s) of the Recording Date and Number: Community Development Code (please circle one only): Development Adjustment $ 100 Rev7128/99 i:lcurpin\masters`adjustmt.mst Special Adjustments. $ 100 •Adjustment to a Subdivision $ 100 • Reduction of Minimum Residential Density $ 100 • Landscaping Adjustments-Existing/New Street Trees $ 100 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ♦ Parking Adjustments-Reduction in Stacking Lane Length $ 100 •Wireless Communication Facility Adjustments-Distance From Another Tower $ 100 Please state the reason for the Adjustment request: Adjust the ✓ Application Elements Submitted: middle unit of the ( 3 ) unit complex back ❑ Application Form 6 ' to allow better cleaance and less of an ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization impact to the 42 ° Conifer that I would ❑' Title Transfer Instrument or Deed prefer to keep. Setback would be 10 ' in Leu ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) of 16 ' . Q' Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") Applicant's Statement (Addressing Criteria Under Section 18.370.020) Filing Fee $14 :88' 1 • APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. �08 DATED this day of 01A,41 O per's Signature Owner's Signature enneth A. Rasmussen Donald D. Rasmussen 11�)C Owner's Signature wner's Sig ature Darla R. Rasmussen Mildred L. Rasmussen 2 I* 2:0:Jh CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment ShapingA 1�3etterCommunity LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 9/21/2000 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00003 VARIANCE (VAR) 2000-00008 FILE TITLE: RASMUSSEN PROJECT APPLICANT: Kenneth Rasmussen OWNER: M.E. and Ruth L. Newbrey 603 Larkspur Court c/o Mildred L. Rasmussen, Trustee Sublimity, OR 97385 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, OR 97385 PHONE/FAX: (503)749-4949 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing the construction of a multi-family dwelling complex with three new attached single family units, one new single family detached unit, and one existing single family attached unit on Tax Lot 03700. This is also a request for an adjustment to the side (south) and rear (west) yard setbacks to reduce tree removal. LOCATION: 9375 SW Coral Street; WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lot 03700. The project is located on the east of SW Greenburg Road on SW Coral Street. ZONE: R-12. Residential, 12 Units Per Acre. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.370, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, REVIEW 18.705, 18.715, 18.720, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, CRITERIA: 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: JUNE 2, 2000 DUE: JUNE 16, 2000 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: JULY 14, 2000 (Tentatively) ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP p NARRATIVE © UTILITY PLANS © ARCHITECTUAL DRAWINGS © SITE PLAN © LANDSCAPE PLAN © GRADING PLANS © OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 315 SDR2000-00003NAR2000-00008 RASMUSSEN PROJECT LAND USE PROPOSAL 66Zia. A-4( }v` r t- ! 1 colxx�v PLANNER -APPLICATION COMPLETE :SS GUIDE PRIOR TO FORWARDING FOR SET-UP ♦ Tidemark Project Data Entry (within 5 days of receipt) • Completeness/Incompleteness Letter (within 30 days of receipt) . When A Project Is Accepted As Complete And Forwarded To The Planning Secretary For File Set- Up, Please Verify That The Following Items Are Included: Land Use Proposal Description: (verify with check mark the materials submitted) ❑ File Number(s) ❑ Project Name ❑ 120 Days (Count the day accepted as day one) ❑ Applicant(s) Name and Address ❑ Owner(s) Name and Address ❑ Any Additional Parties to the Application you Want to Receive Notice (Rep./Attorney, Engineer/Consultant, etc.) ❑ Description of the Proposed Project(s) ❑ Map(s) and Tax Lot(s) and their Corresponding Addresses ❑ Applicable Review Criteria ❑ CIT Area—not"Citywide" unless application is for a CPA or ZOA (CIT area can be found in Permit* Plan-Parcel information) ❑ Date of Public Hearing or Projected Date to Issue the Decision (Planner to set date/confirm with Hearings Officer/Planning Commission/City Council, if applicable) Request For Staff/Agency Comments Notification Sheet: ❑ Applicable (complete a check-off sheet to include agencies/staff you want to receive a notice) ❑ N/A DLCD Notice (CPA's/ZOA's): ❑ Applicable (complete Notice of"Proposed Amendment" NOW! Complete Notice of"Adoption" or"Withdrawal", as applicable) ❑ N/A Application Materials: (NOTE: this is a generic list only) er Signed Land Use Application - 0/ Copy of Warranty or Deed to Verify Ownership ❑ Written Property Owner Authorization From ALL OWNERS if Applicant is NOT the Owner V Narrative ❑ Appropriate Number of Materials for Request for Comments for ALL Hearing Bodies ❑ Plans Folded to Approximately 8.5" x 11" P/ 8.5" x 11" Reproducible Site Plan ❑ Revised Plans Clearly Marked as Revised, Including Revision Dates (applicant is responsible for pulling/replacing/folding plan sheets in all sets of revised plans prior to application acceptance) ❑ LIST IN REPRODUCIBLE MAILING LABEL FORMAT Containing the Names and Addresses of AM Property Owners Within 500'. If the Property Owner List is Not City Generated, Certification that the List Reflects All Property Owners r Within 500 Feet of the Subject Site(s) is Required From the Agency that Generated the List �n 2 Sets of Self-Addressed (no return address), $0.33 Stamped #10 Envelopes. If Applicant is Using a Postage Meter, Iffr�"''U,,,a NO DATE is to be Printed on the Envelopes, Only Postage. /(� ❑ Additional Materials Required in Pre-Application Notes Pre-Application Conference Notes And Materials: ❑ Applicable (Pull original from Planning Secretaries lateral file cabinet (bottom file drawer) by the Section Number) ❑ N/A �, t(,�CL\ t t,� j�(,�-.,f_A idvk Q\, (i- nlmasterslapplication completeness checklist 25-Aug-99 1 S126DC-03700 NEWBREY M E&RUTH L do RASMUSSEN MILDRED L TR 603 SW LARKSPUR CT SUBLIMITY,OR 97385 I I I 91ST r 'a n Q f BORDERS c� LEH . UI 111 ( ( ii41141011111111111111111 I. LOCUST '- ST , . ST � v Community Development )4? /5/ a(r roc 03700 1,�crr�� .1-5 ?Kee., C (70. 74 /5 4 O)O l'Gt// -'y Alte February 18, 2000 _a !l CITY OF TIGARD Kenneth A. Rasmussen OREGON 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Re: Rasmussen Project 00003 P 2000P Incompleteness Letter SDR 2000 0 03NAR Dear Mr. Rasmussen: the City of Tigard is in receipt of your land use application submitted on January 20, 2000. After a preliminary review of the application submittal items, Staff has determined that the application is incomptite. The following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1) Site Development Review: Chapter 18.360 Address all the approval criteria fully under Section 18.360.090 #1-15. 2) Variance: Chapter 18.370 Clarify if you are requesting a side yard setback reduction in addition to the special adjustment for the rear yard setback for purposes to reduce tree removal. Please explain why this is not a self-imposed o o th tree,nd what design constraints there may be due to the to the site. Wk-.0 e- 3) Landscaping and Screening: Chapter 18.745 �(l Provide proposed width of buffer,and buffer 2and screening combination proposed from Tables 18.745.1 a d 6(ikc1 4) Parking Requirements: Chapter 18.765 a. Revise site plan to show at least one van accessible parking space, 9' wide with an 8' aisle on the passenger side. b. Provide depth dimensions on the parking spaces to meet code requirement for 90 degree parking (see 18.765 p. 8) Note that a standard parking space is 8.5' x 18.5' and a compact space is 7.5' x 16.5'. 5) Clarify your intent regarding potential land division, and the placement the of the two detached single family dwelling units on the same lot multi-family dwelling units. Please discuss this with staff to determine whether a land division or a subdivision may be required. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 6) Identify the uses to the east, west, and north of the subject site. 7) Show location of all easements, buildings, and structures within 25 feet of the subject site on the site plan. a°''r 8) Provide a project name. This name will be your reference name for all a 1et permits in our computer system. Public Facility Plans 9) Grading Plan a. Provide existing and proposed contour lines at 2 foot intervals. i b. Address whether adjacent parcels are impacted by proposed grading. Olc. Show grades on adjacent parcels. c 0 10) Sanitary Sewer Issues Show existing and proposed lines on Utility Plan. , 0- t0;- 1P tt. ? 11) Water Issues a. Show existing and proposed clearly and in detail b. Show existing and proposed fire hydrants. Check with Building Division and/or Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 12) Storm Drainage and Water Quality Issues a. Insufficient detail as to how the site will drain, and how storm will discharge into public system. b. Show existing/ proposed lines clearly and in detail. c. Provide preliminary sizing calculation of water quality detention. d. Address whether area for water quality facility matches calculations for size requirements. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315. Yours truly, Karen Fox Associate Planner c: SDR 2000-00003 land use file is curpin\ka re n\sd r\sd r00-03i nc.doc Page 2 N c e c., l Not& 'f s. 4i' i L.LLIZieD , i Q I 644 (211.„,?:h - ts4.1 , q(-he i thee,. p.ott4,/ Yvt4cs-14-4 to (,...- r}rec 44.467.(41-7- (° t t U a,QR -frees 0)...t.1/4 Sp� Y 7,;pac .Q / -7 kb t( .ficcr ..Q ° a � 4 [ - Id cC, - Lut4ek tiF toIsiloack.. -�rt � ., ()cwt 5.(1) - { - 44' , ,J'., h° I tUAt __ 1 L ' INIIIIR∎ 4.4 r.ity _¢. 310 . oI6 .Cr 47" ' ti L l' 1. e 1 ` �+ , 7L (14) P ,/,C,A...A.I- or- G +ruck- V 4 7 su.onk fit_ 1■44,4e)- -+t> wu -1_. tatel k - fna.-- co€r a4-L_ /8.3 - a cl ec��„ ., 115.14. 5- ,a,av too 6-c_6( 7" 69 pa..4,14. --t-sviA„4 ; wtAc.- ,L A 1›,..1-s r-t'b b I`-s t� -4- - ,2 bdr rtn - )( IS:- 45- 1 ir4#r . -4 v.e.w en t I- / 1 • 10.5 Pata--1 dew,, It w� $i+:6- X IC "* S Lc{ 1 l g.S h h,,cA4- bt. v O & ad.a.440h( CL f 4 1,eL Gt../ $1 . 0-- hG✓ 3_ , ,Gk_. & „hue,,-, ., .f.7cs . 3ut wACw a ."... a.3 _ 24 raotd ( . ? early) 4 Vff 2 7,17 0,.e r/ 106 . 3 x /76. /b. -� �� 7i 1. Us oSo a lc l oZ/al'itt , 4424, (44/1S C I. lirti Gt eef��. -�i� 511,AA) ai..1 hit/4p 015- fizipe-1-6 Sefhetc% / c/ 6 M ,nu - 5 se/446'C /D / F'-/! 56/1'-vL - filuvi'a 4,�74 hita /I. 41dr adrer✓t - • �'� 3 vomit-rte PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: 'E-J P , --r FOR Date: Z`is iz LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS II ❑ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE GRADING ❑ Existing and proposed contours shown? ❑ Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES a[']r Right-of-way clearly shown? Centerline of street clearly shown? [r Name of street(s) shown? LK Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? P Profiles of proposed streets 12-1-1,P' Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? Er ❑Trafic study required/submitt ed? w st g{QW E' Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? 0- Check widths proposed on public streets __E1# Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: /t-i pct„ SANITARY SEWER ISSUES . crermli) )---- 9.4 " Existing/proposed lines? Nom ' .Elri,A Stubs to adjacent parcels required? �?%11,1').%... y� TER ISSUES ' K� ��ti Existing/proposed lines? II Existing/proposed fire hydrants? T c � .^-1 gOo-Pn.u,, D‘4'k'O�L eg_ -TvFL. TORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES NOt � OCTAL_Existing/proposed lines? I.-try r G1'14' ''`' tprc � A5 -� t b,� -r, SITE. Preliminary sizing calculation of water qualityfprovided? vas-- pRo+,.tti7. Water quality facility shown on plan? © NAT a(L /45 does area provided match calculations for size requirement? "lc) �v) S ►ik w►y._ ,[-}V1. Stubs to adjacent properties required? V Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? �� 1' � � E i:\englbrianr\masters\public facility plan checklist.doc \I dress: 9375 SW CORAL ormation: E & RUTH L SPUR CT xlot Size: 0.43 (Acres) uare Footage: 1230 (Square Feet) nd Value: $81510 ilding Value: $32420 sed Value: $113930 ate: 12/10/97 $0.00 co a CC 0 ` m GNZ6 1 . - I._ . . , _ . U i Lo ''r. I-- 6, c\I EK 0„,,, N fJ p�;,ffc� 1 L1.LL T - 8N8 e/0 • ($13G.051) pc.�-((M ►Mar 5 1 fAktt (n+46 f e(AA (4a4 A y wail wo t rtcu.egy -(17 (.cM T cam. fee4. E 0 0 1 FEB. 25 '00 09:41AM MODE BLDG SYSTEMS ] - P.5'5 CHAP.11,DIV.! , 1108,1.3 • 1097 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1106.1.10.6 . In banquet rooms or spaces where the head speaker's lectern is 2. Where a building or buildings are exempted by Suction -"s located on a permanent raised platform,the platform shall be ac- 1106.1.10.2 from containing any adaptable dwelling units,common t eesstble in compliance with Saction•J J 09.Open edges on a raised use facilities and parking provided for tenant use need not le accessi- cessible platform shall be protected by a curb with a height of not less than ble.Public use facilities such as management and rental offices and•is- ltor parking shall be accessible. 2 inches(51 mm). 1106,110.2 Number of adaptable dwelling units. All Group 1106.1.4 Group B Occupancies, All affected buildings in R., Division 1 apartments shall have adaptable dwelling units. Group B Occupancies shall he accessible as provided in this Adaptable dwelling units shall be designed and constructed in ac- ,,,, chapter. cordance with Section 1110. 11061.5 Group E Occupancies; All affected buildings in EXCEPTIONS:1.Group R Ocwpsncics conmining three or fcwu i.�' Group E Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap dwelling Writs. 2_ Dwelling units in Group R Division t apartments which are Io- cared on floors other than the ground floor where no elevator is pro- 1106.1_6 Group F Occupancies. All affected buildings in vided within die building(unless it is a mired occupancy described in Group F Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap- section 1106.1.103). Ia. 3. Dwelling units with two or more stories(townhouses)in a non- m elevator building. 1106.1.7 Group H Occupancies. All affected buildings in 4. For sites what multiple,nonelevator buildings are planned for Group H Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this a single site and-where portions of the site have grades prior to develop- ment which eiceed 10 percent,the building official may approve the P following modifrcalerts: 1106.1.8 Group I Occupancies.-All affected buildings in 4.1 'Mc number of adaptable dwelling units provided may be re Group 1 Occupancies shall be accessible in all public-use,corn- duoed to a percentage of the ground floor units which equals the percentage of the entire site having grades,prior to develop- mon-use and employee-use areas, and shall have accessible pa- meta,which are 10 percent or kss;but in no case shall the num- tient rooms,cells and treatment or examination rooms as follows: ter of adaptable dwelling units be less than 20 percent of the 1. In Group I,Division 1.1 patient care units within hospitals ground floor dwelling units on the entire site; which specialize in treating conditions that affect mobility,all pa- a.2 Adaptable dwelling units may bi located in buildings located on beret looms,including associated toilet rooms and bathrooms_ the portion of the site where the grade prior to development has dung slopes of 10 percent or less;ind 2. In Group I,Division 1.1 patient care units within hospitals .4.3 Common-use facilities accessory to buildings not required to which do not specialize in treating conditions that affect:mobilit};---—sr,.:,--s,-oetrtaia-adaptable dwelling units according to item 4.1,above, at least one in every 1 Q patient rooms,including associated toilet • - ,need not be accessible unless there are no other similar facilities vim' P g • ,,;a...-.. ,�.:�.--.._ _ -� rooms and bathrooms. • 1106.1.103 Mixed occupancies. Where the ground I'a _. 3. In Group I,Division 1.1 and Division 2)nutsing homes,and floor of a building is not a Group R, Division 1,tee long-term care facilities,at-least one in every two patient rooms, Apartment Occupancy, the first level of the Group R ag including associated toilet looms and bathrooms' .- Occupancy, which includes dwelling units, shall be Y a 4. In Group I:Division 3 mental health occupaneies,'a least 'considered the ground floor and shall be served by a nd one in every 10 patient rooms,including associated toilet rooms building entrance on an accessible route. Dwelling units and.bathroorns_ 111\l_ - located on this level shall be adaptable dwelling runts. 5. In Group I;Divisions 3 aridA jail,prison and surular occu- • EXCEPTION: Group R Occupancies _ panties. at leash' rcent,but not less than one,rooms or cells, i exempted by Section 1106.1,10.2. �.1�1[99 _ o including,associated toilet.rooms and bathrooms. Accessible . - -�• cells shall be dispersed among'all categories and types�'of general, excep use Thai are owner occupied and co n not,more than housing and holding areas.At least one of each type of special five too for rent or hire, accessible • t rooms including holding cells provided for uses such as.protective custody,disci- associated ., 'ng,shower and toilet:fac es;shall lie provided plinary detention,detoxifications and medical isolation shall also in accordant.'with Table 11-B.in-id.- $lceping rooms or be accessible suites for perso•s with hearing impail ents shall be provided in --- • accordance with ' •ble 11-C. .. •• • : , ••• ;,• '' 6. In Group I Occupancies,all treatment or examination rooms .,, shall be accessible. In addition, pub -use and co mon-use areas of all hotels, motels, inns, boardi : house', dormitories, resorts, lodging•In Grout I;Divisions 1.1 and 2 Occupancies,at least one acces- houses and other'place .1 tr. ient'Iodging;shall be accessible, sible entry that complies with Section 1106.2 shall be under shel- C except those that are own cupied and contain not more than ter.Every such entry shall include a passenger loading zone. five rooms for rent or hi :. 1106.1.9 Group M Occupancies. All affected buildings in Required sleeping r..rns fo .:[sons with hearing impairments Group M Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this shall have visual al s comp ng with Section 1109.14. Such chapter_ or, rooms shall have ' tailed telep• tries complying with Section 1109.13,and an • ectrical outlet ins,• ed within 48 inches(1219 1106.1.10 Group R Occupancies. mm)of the re •.hone connection:Su • rooms shall have devices 1106.1.10.1 General. All affected buildings and covered multi- separate f the visual alarm system. A provide visual no[i- family dwellings in Group R Occupancies shall be accessible as fication a'incoming telephone calls and ••orbell actuation. provided in this chapter Public-and comrnon-tuse areas and faci- Where provided in accessible guest too. • the following facili- lities such as recreational facilities, laundry facilities, garbage ties shall be accessible:dining areas,kitch- kitchenctres,wet and recycling collection areas,mailbox locations,Iobbies,foyers bars,patios,balconies.terraces or similar facih: s. and management offices,shall be accessible. 1106.1.10.5 Proportional distribution. Adaptable dwelling EXCEPTIONS: 1. Group R.Division 3 Occupancies. units shall be apportioned among efficiency dwelling units,single 1-134 FEB 25 '00 09:39RM MODEr. I BLDG SYSTEMS P.1/5 .5c04d _5067/4.77L MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. P.O. Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749-4949 Fax: (503) 749-4950 http://www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER DATE: ZSJzzoD TO: MCI 6)(.. COMPANY: call b 11 Ap FAX: L503) -D FROM: sd T(Pt115561- NUMBER OF PACES: FAX COVER LETTER + I PACES HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES Li NO MI If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as possible at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-4950. FEB 25 '00 09:39AM MODE'" BLDG SYSTEMS . P.2/5 • City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE' SDR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-0003 Letter dated February 18,2000 ATTN: Karen Fox The following is a partial response to your letter dated February 18, 2000. As I will also need some information from you to complete my response. YTEM RESPONSE 1.) 18.360.090 (a) This development will require the half-street improvement to meet the city of Tigard street and utility standards. (b) The dwelling units are situated to preserve two mature fir trees and maximize the amount of landscaped area surrounding the units. The dwelling units are also oriented to protect the bedrooms and patios concerning sun and wind. There is no evidence of ground slumping or sliding. (c) The exterior elevation is broken by a 3' covered porch and a minimum setback of 5'; (this could increase to 11' setback with the middle unit having a 10'rear yard.) Also the roof has a vaulted dormer that exceeds 3' in height. (d) The site is residential; arborvitae will be used primarily to screen the perimeter along the east and west property lines. On the north a 6' high fence will be installed as the existing arborvitae has been removed. Mr. Erickson and Mrs. Tyroff(neighbor to the north) are looking forward to this fence. Screening between patios will probably be an 8' section of 6' high fence for privacy. This will be decided with the tenants. Mr. Zimmerman,the east neighbor is looking for 2 trees and 6'arborvitae for screening. (This was indicated on sheet 2 in purple as per his desire at the neighborhood meeting.) Furthermore, adjacent areas are huge back yards and with their trees and shrubbery they provide very excellent screened areas for privacy. (e) The 6' high fence along the north property will screen the private area. As said in Item 4 the 6' arborvitae and trees will buffer the parking lot. (f) Patios are provided and screening will probably be an 8' section of 6'high fence. (g) The shared outdoor space is the 1000 square ft. plus area along the front of attached three units, which exceeds the 800 square ft. requirement. (h) There is no flood plain. FEB 25 '00 09:40AM MODE" BLDG SYSTEMS P.3/5 (i) Demarcation will be unit signage. (j) Windows are lockable,the mailboxes are at the street and sufficient lights will be attached to the units for visual awareness at dark (k) Public transit is along Greenburg Road. (1) Landscaping is met per the plan. (m)Drainage will be tight-lined and disposed of as per city approval. (n) Any improvements for the disabled will meet Chapter 11 of the UBC. (o) The development will meet the provisions and regulations as approved by the city. 2.) 18.370 I am asking for a side yard and rear yard setback. A 10' rear yard for the middle unit and an 8' side yard to start the end unit away from the 42" diameter Fir. 30 x 30 units maximize the floor area and minimize the perimeter. Narrowing the units does not make the floor plan very livable and creates orientation problems. In addition the neighbors prefer seeing one-story units. That was heard at the neighborhood meeting and in talking to the three adjacent neighbors to the north. This property is surrounded by one-story residences' and Coral Street has predominately one-story residences'. The other predominant theme from the neighbors was (are the Fir trees staying?). I hope so. With the lot shape, driveway location, one-story units and preservation of the trees,this is the best site layout for the zoning. 3.) Is 5' not adequate along the east side? Mr. Zimmerman the east property owner wanted additional trees and 6' arborvitae (as noted in purple on plans). If 5' is not adequate, what is the minimum you will accept? Please fax me the table with your notation. 4.) The three dwelling unit building is R-1. The unattached building is R-3 and I believe this exempts me per 1106.1.10. Please see the attached. The parking is o.k. Dimension F is 46' and the stalls are 8' 6"x 18' 6". The stripes are marked 15'. 5.) The lot will remain 106.3 x 176.10. I have no intention to partition or sub-divide; in fact I plan to paint the existing house to match in color the new units. 6.) The adjacent parcel to the west is presently a one-story single-family dwelling unit zoned R-12. The adjacent parcel to the east is presently a one-story single-family dwelling unit zoned R-12. The adjacent three parcels to the north are presently one- story single-family dwelling units zoned R-4.5; the 2040 Growth Plan process will change this to a R-12 zoning. PEB 25 '00 09:40AM MODE' BLDG SYSTEMS P.4/5 7.) There are no easements and the east and west garages are identified. 8.) Rasmussen Project 9.) Note the doted lines across the site plan. The existing topography will be maintained and how it correlates with the elevation marks. There will be no cuts or fills adjacent to the property lines,thus final grading will have no impact to adjacent parcels. 10&11) Why is this necessary for site development review plans. The information will be indicated on building permit plans. 12.) Again why is this necessary? The calculation was included with the sets I gave you. I am still baffled why detention is necessary for 11,115 square ft. of impervious area, which includes the existing house and driveway that are exempt. There was a $210/unit surcharge indicated in the pre-application notes I received from Mark Roberts. I would rather pay-may I? I look forward to completing this review. You can reach me at work (503) 749-4949 or fax (503) 749-4950. Thank you. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Rasmussen • 1 ' 1`EB 25 '00 09:41AM MODF--' BLDG SYSTEMS 4. P.5/c; CRAP.11,DIV, 1108 1,3 1697 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1106.1.10-6 I , In banquet rooms or spaces where the head speaker's lectern is 2_ Where a building or buildings are exempted by Section located on a permanent raised platform,the platform shall be ac- 1106.1,10.2 from containing any adaptable dwelling units,common ' " cessible in compliance with Sectionl 109.Open edges on a raised use facilities and parking provided for tenant use need not k accessi- platform shall be protected by a curb with a height of not less than me.Public use facilities such as management and rental offices and vis- itor parking shall be accessible. 2 inches(51 mm). 1106.1.10.2 Number of adaptable dwelling units. All Group 1106.1.4 Group B Occupancies, All affected buildings in R, Division 1 apartments shall have adaptable dwelling units.. Group B Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this Adaptable dwelling units shall be designed and constructed in ac- tea. chapter. cordance with Section 1110. 1106.1.5 Group E Occupancies: All affected buildings in EXCEPTIONS:I.Group R Occupancies containing three or fewer — Group E Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap- dwelling units. [e[. 2_ Dwelling units in Group R,Division 1 apartments which are to- cared on(loon other than the ground floor wheso no elevator is pro- 1106.1-6 Group F Occupancies. All affected buildings in vided within the building(unless it is a mixed occupancy described in Group F Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap- Section 1106.1.10.3). 3- Dwelling units with two or more stones(townhouses)in a non- elevator building. 1106.1.7 Group H Occupancies. All affected buildings in 4. For sites what multiple"nonelevator buildings are planned for Group H Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this a single site andrwhere portions of the site have grades prior to develop- ment which exceed 10 percent,the building official may approve the p following modifications: 1106.1.8 Group 1 Occupancies. All affected buildings in 4.1 The number of adaptable dwelling units provided may be re- Group I Occupancies shall be accessible in all public-use,corn diced to a percentage of the ground floor units which equals the perrcntagt of the entire site having grades,prior to develop- mvn-use and employee-use areas, and shall have accessible pa- menu,which are 10 percent or less;but in no case shall the num- tient rooms,cells and treatment or examination rooms as follows: bee or adaptable dwelling units be less than 20 percent of the 1. In Group 1,Division 1.1 patient care units within hospitals 'ground floor dwelling units on the entire site; which specialize in prating conditions that affect mobility.all pa- a-2 Adaptable dwelling units may be located in buildings located on tient rooms,including associated toilet rooms and bathrooms_ the Portion of the site where the grade prior to development has - slopes of 10 potent or less;and 2. In Group I,Division 1.1 patient care.units within hospitals 4.3 Common-use facilities accessory to buildings not'required to which do not specialize in treating conditions that affect mobility--— -777-7' -adaPtable dwelling units according to-Item 4-1,above, at least one in every 10 patient rooms,including associated toilet Wed not be acccsgibk umlcss that art no other similu,facilities•P g 1106.1.103 Mucci occupancies- Where the ground a �L� rooms and bathrooms, e 3. In Group I,Division 1.1 and Division'24nursing homes,and floor of a building is not a Group R, Division 1,he long-term care facilities,at least one in every two patient rooms, Apartment Occupancy, the first level of the Group R rig including associated toilet rooms and bathrooms Occupancy, which includes dwelling units, shall be Y a 4. .In Group L'Division 3 mental health occupancies,a least 'considered the ground floor and shall be served by a eel one in every 10 patient rooms,including associated Miler rooms ibuilding entrance on an accessible route. Dwelling units; and batluooms- II ,1 _.,7';!1- -�'--� ilocated on this level shall be adaptable dwelling units. }°,t S.•'In Group I;Divisions 3 aridA jail,prisonand'siMilar occu- EXCEPTION_ Group R Occupancies{ panties. at leastA'trcent,but not less than one,Moms or cells, I exempted by Section 1106.1.10.2. Elf,td 11 `1 o including associated toilet_rooms and bathrooms. Accessible cells shall be dispetsed'among all categories and types of general, excep osethat are owner occupied and,co n not,more than housing and holding areas.At least one of each type of special five too for rent or hire, accessible _ •.t rooms, including holding cells provided for uses such as protective custody,disci- associated .• rag;shower and toilet'fac - es:shall be provided plinary detention,detoxifications and medical isolation shall also in accordant•`with Table 11-B.In ad.' on; sleeping•rooms or be accessible.— •.. suites for perso•s with hearing impai• ents shall be provided in r.-- accordance with ' •ble 11-C- .. - :. • . 6. In Group I Occupancies,all treatment or examination rooms .. shall be accessible. In addition, pub -use and co mon-use areas of all hotels, motels, inns', boardi _ house , dormitories, resorts, Iodging In Group I;Divisions 1.1 and 2 Occupancies,at least one acces- houses and other'place '.f tr.. ienClodging,shall be.accessible, Bible entry that complies with Section 1106.2 shall be under shel- L except those that are own a, cupied and contain not More than ter.Every such entry shall include a passenger loading zone. five rooms for rent or hi :. 1106.1.9 Group M Occupancies. All affected buildings in Required sleeping r..rns fo •'rsons with hearing impairments Group M Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this shall have visual al. s comp 'ng with Section 1109.14. Such (.1 chapter_ rooms shall have ' tailed icier,'•nes complying With'Section 1109.13,and an • ectrical outlet ins.• ed within 48 inches:0219 1106.1.10 Group R Occupancies. mm)of the to .hone connection:Su • rooms shall',have devices 1106.1.10.1 General. All affected buildings and covered multi- separate fro the visual alarm system. 'ch provide visual noti- family dwellings in Group R Occupancies shall be accessible as ficapon .'incoming telephone calls and ••orbell actuation. provided in this chapter_Public-and common-use areas and faci- Where provided in accessible guest too r • the following facili- lilies such as recreational facilities, laundry facilities, garbage ties shall be accessible! dining areas,kitchen kitchenettes,wet and recycling collection areas,mailbox locations,lobbies,foyers bars,patios,balconies,terraces or similar facile: s. and management offices,shall be accessible. 1106-1.10.5 Proportional distribution. Adaptable dwelling EXCEPTIONS: I. Group R.Division 3 Occupancies. units shall be apportioned among efficiency dwelling units,single 1-134 F`F 25 '00 09:39AM MODEr BLDG SYSTEMS . P.2/5 X1160/1., ke/vfeex.J 3//7/6v City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-0003 Letter dated February 18, 2000 ATTN: Karen Fox The following is a partial response to your letter dated February 18, 2000. As I will also need some information from you to complete my response, ITEM RESPONSE 1.) 18.360.090 (a) This development will require the half-street improvement to meet the city of Tigard street and utility standards. (b) The dwelling units are situated to preserve two mature fir trees and maximize the amount of landscaped area surrounding the units. The dwelling units are also oriented to protect the bedrooms and patios concerning sun and wind. There is no evidence of ground slumping or s sliding. (0'A (c) The exterior elevation is broken by a 3' covered porch and a minimum setback of 5'; (this could increase to 11' setback with the middle unit having a 10' rear yard.) Also the roof has a vaulted dormer that exceeds 3' in height. , _ _ g( ad,G� 0- ( F f_ � e--- f � r Pitklkiv LA- (d) The site is residential; arborvitae will be used primarily to screen the perimeter along the east 5 and west property lines. On the north a 6' high fence will be installed as the existing arborvitae 0/410"w) has been removed. Mr. Erickson and Mrs. Tyroff(neighbor to the north) are looking forward to this fence. Screening between patios will probably be an 8' section of 6' high fence for privacy. This will be decided with the tenants. Mr. Zimmerman, the east neighbor is looking for 2 trees and 6' arborvitae for screening. (This was indicated on sheet 2 in purple as per his desire at the neighborhood meeting.) Furthermore, adjacent areas are huge back yards and with their trees and shrubbery they provide very excellent screened areas for privacy. ., (e) The 6' high fence along the north property will screen the private area. As said in Item 4 the 6' arborvitae and trees will buffer the parking lot. L. (f) Patios are provided and screening will probably be an 8' section of 6' high fence. (g) The shared outdoor space is the 1000 square ft. plus area along the front of attached three units, which exceeds the 800 square ft. requirement. _ ; b-c+ kS vv (h) There is no flood plain. r � ' 4 ,C ( Z se,&z.61 ,,p� ,9C1 t /2e r-61 — to 10-F-1- 5r otty,i,td 8 ' at 1 - antfra 80,c «d atA0A 5-7e 5 FEB 25 '00 09:40AM MODE'" BLDG SYSTEMS P.3/5 (i) Demarcation will be unit signage. (j) Windows are lockable, the mailboxes are at the street and sufficient lights will be attached to the units for visual awareness at dark. (k) Public transit is along Greenburg Road. i t// 7r (1) Landscaping is met per the plan. tiuw uk )4)a a too 4 I'AC - ' 1; (m)Drainage will be tight-lined and disposed of as per city approval. #0o I.6 e a i 64 mackc 5 (n) Any improvements for the disabled will meet Chapter 11 of the UBC. S��y}tiv — s (o) The development will meet the provisions and regulations as approved by the city. . p // 2.) 18.370 I am asking for a side yard and rear yard setback. A 10' rear yard for the middle unit and an 8' side yard to start the end unit away from the 42" diameter Fir. 30 x 30 units maximize the floor area and minimize the perimeter. Narrowing the units does not make the floor plan very livable and creates orientation problems. In addition the neighbors prefer seeing one-story units. That was heard at the neighborhood meeting and in talking to the three adjacent neighbors to the north. This property is surrounded by one-story residences' and Coral Street has predominately one-story residences'. The other predominant theme from the neighbors was (are the Fir trees staying?). I hope so. With the lot shape, driveway location, one-story units and preservation of the trees, this is the best site layout for the zoning. (5 e f 3.) Is 5' not adequate along the east side? Mr. Zimmerman the east property owner P/°o (714/12,--7 wanted additional trees and 6' arborvitae (as noted in purple on plans). If 5' is not S{� adequate, what is the minimum you will accept? Please fax me the table with your notation. 4.) The three dwelling unit building is R-1. The unattached building is R-3 and I believe this exempts me per 1106.1.10. Please see the attached. The parking is o.k. Dimension F is 46' and the stalls are 8' 6"x 18' 6". The stripes are marked / € U 15''' — 4L ;/ i i. i/1 dot� // T 'N- 5.) The lot will remain 106.3 x 176.10. I have no intention to partition or sub-divide; in fact I plan to paint the existing house to match in color the new units. 6.) The adjacent parcel to the west is presently a one-story single-family dwelling unit zoned R-12. The adjacent parcel to the east is presently a one-story single-family / dwelling unit zoned R-12. The adjacent three parcels to the north are presently one- story single-family dwelling units zoned R-4.5; the 2040 Growth Plan process will change this to a R-12 zoning. I� �L - FEB 25 '00 09:40RM MODE'," BLDG SYSTEMS P.4/5 7.) There are no easements and the east and west garages are identified. 8.) Rasmussen Project 9_) Note the doted lines across the site plan. The existing topography will be maintained and how it correlates with the elevation marks. There will be no cuts or fills adjacent to the property lines,thus final grading will have no impact to adjacent parcels. Vis" 10&11) Why is this necessary for site development review plans. The information will be indicated on building permit plans. 12.) Again why is this necessary? The calculation was included with the sets I gave you. I am still baffled why detention is necessary for 11,115 square ft. of impervious area, which includes the existing house and driveway that are exempt. There was a $210/unit surcharge indicated in the pre-application notes I received from Mark Roberts. I would rather pay- may I? I look forward to completing this review. You can reach me at work (503) 749-4949 or fax (503) 749-4950. Thank you. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Rasmussen MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: March 6, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: Rasmussen Project: SW Coral Street I have reviewed the "resubmittal" on this application and recommend that it still be deemed incomplete. I find the comments made by Mr. Rasmussen to be inadequate. I can live with the grading information he provided, but the remainder of my original comments will remain. I did not see any calculations for the detention pond when I first looked at the plans. Do you have them? Also, he asked about paying the fee in-lieu of water quality. If he is proposing that, his engineer would need to provide me with a letter indicating why it is infeasible for him to construct such a facility, as outlined under the exemptions section of USA's Design and Construction Standards. I:\engthrianrtorrespondence\03062000-kpf-comp.doc • March 17, 2000 �_AL CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Re: Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 (note variance casefile # change) Dear Mr. Rasmussen: The City of Tigard is in receipt of your letter dated February 25, 2000 which was a partial application re-submittal. After a preliminary review of the letter you submitted, Staff has determined that the application is still incomplete. The following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete: Public Facility Plans 1) Sanitary Sewer Issues: Show existing and proposed lines. 2) Water Issues a. Show existing and proposed lines clearly and in detail b. Show existing and proposed fire hydrants. Check with the Building Division and/or Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 3) Storm Drainage and Water Quality Issues a. Insufficient detail as to how the site will drain, and how the stormwater will discharge into the public system. b. Show the existing/proposed lines clearly and in detail. c. If you are proposing to pay the fee-in lieu of water quality, your engineer will need to provide the City Engineer, Brian Rager, with a letter indicating why it is infeasible for him to construct such a facility, as outlined under the exemptions section of the Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter City of Tigard Landuse Casefile#SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Page 2 In addition, please note that the required landscape buffer to the north, east and west of the site is Buffer Standard C; note that on Table 18.745.2 Buffer Standard C requires an 8 foot wide buffer with a minimum 5 foot high fence, or a 10 foot wide buffer with a 4 foot high wall, or a 6 foot wide buffer with a 6 foot wall. The buffer requires a combination of landscaping including trees (15 feet minimum -30 feet maximum spacing) and shrubs planted to code standards. If you have questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315 or Brian Rager at ext. 318 for public facility questions. • Yours truly, en Fox Associate Planner I:curpin\karen\sd r\sdr\00-03inc2.doc 3rvt )bmH-/GCS/ RECEIVED 04/25/00 APR 2 5 moo COMM�NI" DEVEcopiv yr City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Karen Fox Re: SDR 2000-00003 /VAR 2000-00008 Rasmussen Project Dear Ms. Fox, This letter pertains to your letter dated March 17, 2000. The following is my response: ITEM RESPONSE 1.) See the attached drawing. Will use 4" diameter sanitary and tap into the existing 4" diameter CI line. 2.) The street has an existing 6" C.I. Will tap in with a loop to(4) four new 3/4" meters. The fire hydrants are at 92nd and Coral and Greenburg and Coral unless another fire hydrant is added at the Phoenix Inn under construction on Coral. 3.) It took awhile to get a response out of USA. Lee Walker is supposed to contact you or Brian. Per Larry a water quality swale would suffice at the southeast corner. An 8'buffer with a 6' fence will be used. See the attached drawings. If any issue is still outstanding I want to personally meet with you and Brian R. if necessary. Sincerely, Ken eth A. Rasmussen March 17, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Re: Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 (note variance casefile # change) Dear Mr. Rasmussen: The City of Tigard is in receipt of your letter dated February 25, 2000 which was a partial application re-submittal. After a preliminary review of the letter you submitted, Staff has determined that the application is still incomplete. The following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete: Public Facility Plans 1) Sanitary Sewer Issues: Show existing and proposed lines. �c f 3q5 2) Water Issues a. Show existing and proposed lines clearly and in detail b. Show existing and proposed fire hydrants. Check with the Building Division and/or Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 3) Storm Drainage and Water Quality Issues a. Insufficient detail as to how the site will drain, and how the stormwater will discharge into the public system. b. Show the existing/proposed lines clearly and in detail. c. If you are proposing to pay the fee-in lieu of water quality, your engineer will need to provide the City Engineer, Brian Rager, with a letter indicating why it is infeasible for him to construct such a facility, as outlined under the exemptions section of the Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter City of Tigard Landuse Casefile#SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Page 2 In addition, please note that the required landscape buffer to the north, east and west of the site is Buffer Standard C; note that on Table 18.745.2 Buffer Standard C requires an 8 foot wide buffer with a minimum 5 foot high fence, or a 10 foot wide buffer with a 4 foot high wall, or a 6 foot wide buffer with a 6 foot wall. The buffer requires a combination of landscaping including trees (15 feet minimum -30 feet maximum spacing) and shrubs planted to code standards. If you have questions regarding this ietter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315 or Brian Rager at ext. 318 for public facility questions. Yours truly, 11: ate-kv en Fox Associate Planner I:curpinikarenlsdr\sd r100-03inc2.doc 03/.28/00 TUE 16:50 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING a 001 u o TICRRn 16"CI D 8 cV 8" C O c) F- M t A\ n 0 i C' d > w h\ c 92nd 4" GV p 4" CI 4"CV 6" GV 0 0 R" CI „rn d I I 0:a) I I 1 May 25, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Kenneth Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, Oregon 97385 RE: Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Completeness letter as of 5/25100 Dear Mr. Rasmussen: The City of Tigard received your application re-submittal for Site Development Review on April 25, 2000 for the property located at 9735 SW Coral Street. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete, and scheduled for review. Staff has identified a tentative target date of July 14, 2000 for the decision on your proejct. Please note that this is a target date only and that a decision may be issued before or after that date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Yours truly, ✓ ° � Karen Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Land Use Casefile: #SDR2000-00003 I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-3acc.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Propo s ( / r *ve_ , FEB 25 '00 09:39AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS . P.2'5 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SDK 2000-00003/VAR 2000-0003 Lesser dazed February 18,2000 ATTN: Karen Fox The following is a partial response to your letter dated February 18, 2000. As I will also need some information from you to complete my response. ITEM RESPONSE 1.) 18.360.090 (a) This development will require the half-street improvement to meet the city of Tigard street and utility standards. (b) The dwelling units are situated to preserve two mature fir trees and maximize the amount of landscaped area surrounding the units. The dwelling units are also oriented to protect the bedrooms and patios concerning sun and wind_ There is no evidence of ground slumping or sliding. (c) The exterior elevation is broken by a 3' covered porch and a minimum setback of 5'; (this could increase to 11' setback with the middle unit having a 10'rear yard.) Also the roof has a vaulted dormer that exceeds 3' in height (d) The site is residential; arborvitae will be used primarily to screen the perimeter along the east and west property lines. On the north a 6'high fence will be installed as the existing arborvitae has been removed. Mr. Erickson and Mrs. Tyroff(neighbor to the north) are looking forward to this fence. Screening between patios will probably be an 8' section of 6' high fence for privacy. This will be decided with the tenants. Mr. Zimmerman,the east neighbor is looking for 2 trees and 6' arborvitae for screening. (This was indicated on sheet 2 in purple as per his desire at the neighborhood meeting.) Furthermore, adjacent areas are huge back yards and with their trees and shrubbery they provide very excellent screened areas for privacy. (e) The 6' high fence along the north property will screen the private area. As said in Item 4 the 6' arborvitae and trees will buffer the parking lot. (f) Patios are provided and screening will probably be an 8' section of 6' high fence. (g) The shared outdoor space is the 1000 square ft. plus area along the front of attached three units, which exceeds the 800 square ft. requirement. (h) There is no flood plain. FEB 25 '.80 09:40AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.3'5 (i) Demarcation will be unit signage. (j) Windows are lockable,the mailboxes are at the street and sufficient lights will be attached to the units for visual awareness at dark. (k) Public transit is along Greenburg Road. (1) Landscaping is met per the plan. (m)Drainage will be tight-lined and disposed of as per city approval. (n) Any improvements for the disabled will meet Chapter 11 of the'BBC. (o) The development will meet the provisions and regulations as approved by the city. 2.) 18.370 I am asking for a side yard and rear yard setback. A 10' rear yard for the middle unit and an 8' side yard to start the end unit away from the 42" diameter Fir. 30 x 30 units maximize the floor area and minimize the perimeter. Narrowing the units does not make the floor plan very livable and creates orientation problems_ In addition the neighbors prefer seeing one-story units. That was heard at the neighborhood meeting and in talking to the three adjacent neighbors to the north. This property is surrounded by one-story residences' and Coral Street has predominately one-story residences'. The other predominant theme from the neighbors was (are the Fir trees staying?). I hope so. With the lot shape, driveway location, one-story units and preservation of the trees, this is the best site layout for the zoning. 3.) Is 5' not adequate along the east side? Mr. Zimmerman the east property owner wanted additional trees and 6' arborvitae (as noted in purple on plans). If 5' is not adequate, what is the minimum you will accept? Please fax me the table with your notation. 4.) The three dwelling unit building is R-1. The unattached building is R-3 and I believe this exempts me per 1106.1.10. Please see the attached. The parking is o.k Dimension F is 46' and the stalls are 8' 6" x 18' 6". The stripes are marked 15'. 5.) The lot will remain 106.3 x 176.10, I have no intention to partition or sub-divide; in fact I plan to paint the existing house to match in color the new units. 6.) The adjacent parcel to the west is presently a one-story single-family dwelling unit • zoned R-12. The adjacent parcel to the east is presently a one-story single-family dwelling unit zoned R-12. The adjacent three parcels to the north are presently one- story single-family dwelling units zoned R-4.5; the 2040 Growth Plan process will change this to a R-12 zoning. FEB 25 '00 09:40AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.4/5 7.) There are no easements and the east and west garages are identified. 8.) Rasmussen Project 9.) Note the doted lines across the site plan. The existing topography will be maintained and how it correlates with the elevation marks. There will be no cuts or fills adjacent to the property lines,thus final grading will have no impact to adjacent parcels. 10&11) Why is this necessary for site development review plans. The information will be indicated on building permit plans. 12.) Again why is this necessary? The calculation was included with the sets I gave you. I am still baffled why detention is necessary for 11,115 square ft. of impervious area, which includes the existing house and driveway that are exempt. There was a $210/unit surcharge indicated in the pre-application notes I received from Mark Roberts. I would rather pay- may I? I look forward to completing this review. You can reach me at work (503) 749-4949 or fax (503) 749-4950. Thank you. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Rasmussen FEB. 25 '00 09:41AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.5/5 CHAP.11,DIV,I 1106,1.3 1887 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1106.1.10.6 . In banquet rooms or spaces where the head speaker's lectern is 2- Where a building or buildings are exempted by Section located on a permanent raised platform,the platform shall be ac- 1106.1,10.2 from containing any adaptable dwelling units,common cessible in compliance with Sectional 109-Open edges on a raised + use facilities and parking provided for tenant use recd not Inc acccssi- 'i- platform shall be protected by a curb with a height of not less than 1` ble.Public use facilities such as management and rental offices and vis- 2 inches(51 mm)_ itor parking shall be accessible. 1106.1.10.2 Number of adaptable dwelling units. All Group 1106.1.4 Group B Occupandes, All affected buildings in R., Division 1 apartments shall have adaptable dwelling units. Group B Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this Adaptable dwelling units shall be designed and constructed in ac- chapter. cordance with Section 1110. CT 1106.1.5 Group E Occupancies: All affected buildings in EXCEPTIONS:I.Group R Occupancies containing three or fewer Group E Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap dwelling units. - Icr. 2- Dwelling units in Group R Division 1 apatancats which are lo_ caned on floors other than the ground floor where no elevator is pro- 1106.1.6 'Group F Occupancies. All affected buildings in vided within the building(unless it is a mixed occupancy described in Group F Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this chap- Section 1106.1,10,3). 3- Dwelling units with two or more stones(townhouses)in a non- Iet elevator building. 1106.1.7 Group H Occupancies. All affected buildings in 4. For sites where multiple,nonelevator buildings are planned for v_ - Group H Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this a single site and'whert portions of the site have grades prior to develop- ment which exceed 10 percent,the building official may approve the p er following modifrcarionu: 1106.1.5 Group 1 Occupancies, All affected buildings in 4.1 The number of adaptable dwelling units provided may be re Group I Occupancies shall be accessible in all public-use,corn diced w a percentage of the ground floor units which equals the and employee-use areas, and shall have accessible pa- near, ragc of the entire site or having tides,prior al the muu,which are 10 percent or ksn;but in no cave shall the num- tient rooms,cells and treatment or examination rooms as follows: her of adaptable dwelling units be less than 20 percent of the I. In Group I,Division 1.1 patient care units within hospitals 'ground floor dwelling units on the entire site; 4,2 Adaptable dwelling units may be located in buildings located on which specialize in treating conditions that affect mobility,all pa- the portion of the site where the grade prior to development has tient rooms,including associated toilet rooms and bathrooms. - - slopes of 10 percent or teas;and 2. In Group I,Division 1.1 patient care units within hospitals -4.3 Common-use facilities accessory to buildings not rtequired to which do not specialize in heating conditions that affeermobility,---—I*-r -adaPt'ble dwelling units according to Item 4.1.,above; at least one in every 10 patient rooms,including associated'toilet need not be accecssiblc unless that are no other similarlacilities rooms and bathrooms. ;.. . . ' 1106.1.103 Mixed occupancies. Where the ground f a L^ 3. In Group I,Division 1.1 and Division 2lnursing homes,and floor of a building is riot a Group R, Division 1,be long-term care facilities,at least one in every two-patient rooms, Apartment Occupancy, the first level of the Group R rig including associated toilet rooms and bathrooms.."'.. -, Occupancy, which includes dwelling units, shall be V a 4. In Group L'Division 3 mental health occupancies,'a least 'considered the ground floor and shall be served by a ed one in every 10 patient rooms,including associated'toilet rooms 'building entrance on an accessible route. Dwelling units and bathrooms. :. ' "' located on this level shall be adaptable dwelling units. 10- - 11�1�q°1 P g 5. In Group I;Divisions 3 aridy jail,prison and similar occu- EXCEPTION: Group R Occupancies of pancies, at leash k rcent,but not less than one,rooms or cells, o- exempted by Section 1106.1.10.2. Ef.t�tt19 including associated .toilet_rooms and bathrooms. Accessible - - • cells shall'be dispeised among all categories and types of general, eiteep ose that-are owner occupied and co "n not mote than housing and holding areas.At least one of each type of special five too for rent or hire, accessible _ • t rooms;including holding cells provided for uses such as,protective custody,disci- associated .. •rig,shower and toilet fac- es;shall to provided plinary detention,detoxiftcations and medical isolation shall also in accordant.`with Table 11-B.`In-ad." on;'sleeping rooms or be accessible- ' suites for perso•s with hearing impai• ents shall be provided in - 6. In Group I Occupancies,all treatment or examination rooms accordance with •Dle 11 C. :, shall be accessible. In addition, pub -use and co mon-use areas of all hotels, " motels, inns, boardi ._ house , dormitories, resorts, Iodging In Group I;Divisions 1_1 and 2 Occupancies.at least one acces- houses and other place .f ii.. ieni'lodging;shall be accessible, sible entry that complies with Section 1106.2 shall be under shel- C except those that are own y, cupied and contain not More than ter.Every such entry shall include a passenger loading zone. k five rooms for rent or hi :. - . 1106.1.9 Group M Occupancies. All affected buildings in Required sleeping r•.ms fo ••rsons with hearing impairments Group M Occupancies shall be accessible as provided in this shall have visual al s comp "ng with Section 1109.14. Such (- chapter- 1,L, moms shall have ' tailed telep•%nes complying with Section 1109.13,and an • ectrical outlet ins.. ed within 48 inches(1 .19 1106.1.10 Group R Occupancies. mm)of the re •'hone connection:Su • rooms shall:have devices nod- 1106.1.19.1 General. All affected buildings and covered multi- separate f the visual alarm system c�provide visual nori- family dwellings in Group R Occupancies shall be accessible as fication •'incoming telephone calls and •.orbell actuation. provided in this chapter_Public-and common-use areas and faci- Where provided in accessible guest too' • the following facili- lities such as recreational facilities, laundry facilities, garbage ties shall be accessible: dining areas,kitchen kitchenettes,wet and recycling collection areas,mailbox locations,Iobbies,foyers bars,patios,balconies,terraces or similar facih: s. and management offices,shall be accessible. 1106.1.10.5 Proportional distribution. Adaptable dwelling } EXCEPTIONS: 1. Group R.Division 3 Occupancies. units shall be apportioned among efficiency dwelling units,single ` 1-13.4 RECEIVED PLANNING APR 2 5 2000 04/25/00 CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Karen Fox Re: SDR 2000-00003 /VAR 2000-00008 Rasmussen Project Dear Ms. Fox, This letter pertains to your letter dated March 17, 2000. The following is my response: ITEM RESPONSE 1.) See the attached drawing. Will use 4" diameter sanitary and tap into the existing 4" diameter CI line. 2.) The street has an existing 6" C.I. Will tap in with a loop to(4) four new 3/4" meters. The fire hydrants are at 92nd and Coral and Greenburg and Coral unless another fire hydrant is added at the Phoenix Inn under construction on Coral. 3.) It took awhile to get a response out of USA. Lee Walker is supposed to contact you or Brian. Per Larry a water quality swale would suffice at the southeast corner. An 8'buffer with a 6' fence will be used. See the attached drawings. If any issue is still outstanding I want to personally meet with you and Brian R. if necessary. Sincerely, Ken eth A. Rasmussen A March 17, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Kenneth A. Rasmussen 603 Larkspur Court Sublimity, Oregon 97385 Re: Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 (note variance casefile # change) Dear Mr. Rasmussen: The City of Tigard is in receipt of your letter dated February 25, 2000 which was a partial application re-submittal. After a preliminary review of the letter you submitted, Staff has determined that the application is still incomplete. The following information or items are necessary before the application can be deemed complete: Public Facility Plans 1) Sanitary Sewer Issues: Show existing and proposed lines. r-ms kaN- • 2) Water Issues a. Show existing and proposed lines clearly and in detail l b. Show existing and proposed fire hydrants. Check with the Building Division and/or Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 3) " Storm Drainage and Water Quality Issues a. Insufficient detail as to how the site will drain, and how the stormwater will discharge into the public system. b. Show the existing/proposed lines clearly and in detail. c. If you are proposing to pay the fee-in lieu of water quality, your engineer will need to provide the City Engineer, Brian Rager, with a letter indicating why it is infeasible for him to construct such a facility, as outlined tinder the exemptions section of the Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Rasmussen Project Second Incompleteness Letter City of Tigard Landuse Casefile#SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Page 2 In addition, please note that the required landscape buffer to the north, east and west of the site is Buffer Standard C; note that on Table 18.745.2 Buffer Standard C requires an 8 foot wide buffer with a minimum 5 foot high fence, or a 10 foot wide buffer with a 4 foot high wall, or a 6 foot wide buffer with a 6 foot wall. The buffer requires a combination of landscaping including trees (15 feet minimum -30 feet maximum spacing) and shrubs planted to code standards. If you have questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 315 or Brian Rager at ext. 318 for public facility questions. Yours truly, k en Fox Associate Planner I:curpin\karen\sdrlsdr 100-03inc2.doc 03/28/00 TUE 16:50 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING 001 RG o 0 :" C/ )v TICAp p rs'G e cV r 0 G d n 1 71 a 7 n � � 0 ...- ,J, ,-.,:u G � > w h t c ' 92nd I I . < 1 < 4" GV 0 4" CI 4"GV 6" GV 0 0 6" CI 1 ° I 1 1 1 oar APPLICANT'S STATEMENT CRITERIA 18.370.020 Special Adjustment: Adjust rear set back to 10' at middle unit to mitigate impact and protect preservation of 42" Conifer. Type 1 Procedure Reasons: 1.) The 42" Conifer is a special tree and should not be disturbed as much as possible. 2.) The site plan layout maximizes landscape and minimises impervious area with 36" and 42" Conifer included as shown. 3.) The area to the rear is to be rezoned in the future to R-12. 4.) The building code allows a set back of 5 feet for R-1 Type V-N. 5.) The arborist has verbally said the farther the building line away the better. (Less encroachment on tree canopy) MODERN BUILDING SYS. CMS, INC. J08 1I t 9493 Porter Rd. SE P.O. Box 110 SHEET NO. OF AUMSVILLE, OREGON 97325 CALCULATED BY Y ' DATE :1=2 (503) 749-4949 Fax (503) 749-4950 CHECKED BY DATE - SCALE 333'.5 3 Z IS(Zd1 :.4S; C � � ` D,(01 �Z 3�.t',�.5_� a .wv1 4=s.44. D-444-4' 420.s ilia _ 5 (song)g) Co c at.I (f4-} C Z 3z- `tz ZS;t Z= o.661a >A„ +3. 171,1.0. /.4.4 - 4. { 42: 02s I te i Da ed NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING RE: Ken Rasmussen/9375 SW Coral Street Development Dear Interested Party: Please let me introduce myself. My name is Ken Rasmussen and I am the owner of 9375 SW Coral Street(tax map 151 26 DC tax lot 3700). I have owned this R-12 zoned property since 1983 with the desire to develop this property someday. That time has come and I am considering proposing adding four single-story multi-family dwelling units to the North of the existing single family dwelling. The property will not be subdivided, as I will remain the owner,However,this proposal requires a site development review for the property. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits,I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday December ls`, 1999 7:00-8:30 p.m. City of Tigard Town Hall Room 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at work at (503)749-4949 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4 • - --- enn- Rasmussen P.E. IMPACT STUDY Note: Will be short and to the point since this is very small development of a (4) unit addition on less than 1/2 acre. NOISE IMPACT: The property is zoned R-12. The 20-40 Plan will increase the R-12 zoned area in this location. The down hill neighbor to the East would like to see (2)trees added and 6'arborvitae @ 2'-6" o/c used to help buffer noise and privacy. The neighbor to the North did not show up at the neighborhood meeting. The neighbor to the West,Mrs. Hanson, does not object to the proposal as I personally stopped and visited her. I am proposing an upscale two-bedroom unit in hope of attracting professional and mature tenants. The interview and selection of tenants should also help in controlling noise; since noise is more of behavioral thing in bedroom communities. Noise will be mitigated and the impact very minimal due to the size and nature of the development. PARKS SYSTEMS: The property,when fully occupied should add about eleven people to a population of 37,000. This is not a negative impact in any way. Besides a positive impact will be the systems development fee charged for this project which will benefit the public. WATER SYSTEM: Coral Street has a 6"dia. main and no improvements are necessary. The entire TVWD Metzger Division operates at approximately 3 million gallons per day in the winter and about 6 million gallons per day in the summer. The existing dwelling consumes an average of 200 to 250 gallons per day, which is a good indication of the consumption for each of the other 4 units. The water comes from Bull Run and is purchased from-the Portland Water Bureau. Obviously supply, demand and added infrastructure set the price for water which is shared by all. SEWER SYSTEM: Coral Street has an 8"dia.sewer line running towards the east. There will be a hook-up charge, which is used for future improvements and a monthly bill for services. The hook-up fees mitigate the impact and 4 units into an 8"dia. line is not a problem and no improvements are necessary. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: This site imperious area of 11,115 sq ft will be connected to a onsite detention basin. The outflow and overflow will be connected to a 12" CSP, which heads east on Coral Street. The area is very small compared to the overall drainage basin however, the detention basin will mitigate peak flow for this site. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: Regarding bikeways - Coral Street is a small residential access street; however, the street has a 60' right away. Just 516 ' to the west is Greenburg Road where bikeways exist. Regarding traffic, the existing dwelling normally has 1 vehicle in the driveway; per the parking standard six vehicles would exist for the four new units for a total of seven vehicles. With 1 to 2 round trips per day on a 60' right-of- way street normally headed west 516 feet to Greenburg Road a major arterial. Thus, the traffic will pass by only the illnx; residents. This is very little traffic distance and impact to the neighborhood and with Coral Street paved approximately 34' wide the street is adequate to carry the additional traffic adequately. • APPLICANT'S STATEMENT CRITERIA 18.360 NARRATIVE: The existing site has a approximately 1930's/ 1 1/2 story bungalow located in the southwest corner of the property. The property is currently zoned R-12 and has been zoned this for sometime. Currently there is discussion on the Twenty-forty Growth Concept and with this plan the zoning will remain the same. One of the ideals of the Twenty-forty Growth Concept is infill housing on large lot locations. R-12 zoning allows a residential unit density of 5.2; this is greater than the existing unit and proposed four new units to the north. The property slopes approximately 10' diagonally across the lot from northwest to southeast. Presently there are two large locust trees in the right of way along Coral Street,two large black walnut trees in the southwest corner along the west property line and two large fir trees in the northwest corner area. All the trees will remain; I am looking for an adjustment to property line setback to alleviate impact to a 42"fir tree. The property will be paved at the east driveway along with eight parking stalls; four stalls will be covered parking. The four 900 sq. foot houses will have a 5:12 roof slope with vaulted ceilings and dormer with architectural shingles,double wall construction with lap siding. The walkways leading to the units will be concrete with low maintenance landscaping in the open areas. Forty-one percent of the lot will be landscaping and each unit will have its own backyard primarily off of the 100 sq. foot patio. Buffering and screening will be primarily accomplished by the existing fente and planted arborvitae along the property lines. Exterior lighting will be handled by exterior mounted fluorescent lights. Public transit is available at Greenburg Road to the west. CRITERIA 18.390 NARRATIVE: Type II Procedure for site development review is required with application requirements as listed in 18.390.040 1 and 2 a,b,c,d and e. CRITERIA 18.510 NARRATIVE: The property is zoned R-12 medium density residential district. The maximum density is calculated at 5.2. The setbacks are 8'to the sides and 16'to the rear. This allows a 20 percent reduction for tree preservation. I'll also ask for a further reduction from 16'to 10'on the middle unit to further lessen the impact on the 42" tree. At this time no accessory structures are planned. CRITERIA 18.705 NARRATIVE: A 1/2 street improvement per city of Tigard standards is required. There is an existing 16' wide driveway to the west of the house that will be paved. A 30' entrance and 24'wide driveway along the east property will access the four units to the rear;this requires paving also. Concrete walks will lead from the parking stalls to the individual units. The site plan meets the requirements of this section. CRITERIA 18.715 NARRATIVE: This site has no land that is in the 100-year flood plain, drainage ways, wetlands or slopes exceeding 25 percent. The site allows a density of 5.2 units per the density calculation. CRITERIA 18.730 NARRATIVE: The site is not a flag lot and the structures are one-story with a height less than 25'. There is no zero lot line requirement. Coral Street is a local street,yet it has a 60'right-of-way and the front yard set back for the existing house is approximately 17' 9". Units 1,2,3and 4 windowed walls have at least a 15' separation and unit 4 is separated from the parking lot by 9'. There will be no storage in the front yard along Coral Street. CRITERIA 18.745 NARRATIVE: The site shall be landscaped as indicated and existing vegetation and trees will be protected as much as possible. 042" qi flowering Plum Street will be provided. A existing 6' high fence and arborvitae will be used for buffering and screening along the east property line. The north and west property lines would be arborvitae and ground cover exclusively. CRITERIA 18.755 NARRATIVE: The space requirement would be 4sq ft/1000(3600sq ft 1= 14.4sq ft). This is less than the 30- 35sq ft area proposed. Miller's Garbage Service has been notified by faxing a site plan. CRITERIA 18.765 NARRATIVE: The existing house has an existing driveway along the west property line. This driveway will be paved. The new 4 units will be served by a paved 24'access and 8 parking stalls along the east property line(note that only 5 stalls are required). A bicycle rack will be provided along with 4 covered parking stalls closest to the units. CRITERIA 18.780 NARRATIVE: There will be no signs requiring a permit. There will be a small sign mounted to each unit for unit identification. These signs are exempt from permit per 18.780.060 1.b. CRITERIA 18.790 NARRATIVE: No trees that are over 12" inches in diameter are planned to be removed. However,the arborist report recommends removal of(1)20" inch diameter black walnut that has heart rot. Please refer to Walter H. Knapp's report. There is(1)42" inch diameter fir tree that requires as much building set back as possible to mitigate as much impact as possible. In the neighborhood • J meeting the neighbors were glad that the trees are remaining and that the living units were only one-story. CRITERIA 18.795 NARRATIVE: There is no visual clearance area problem. It is noted that landscaping shall not exceed 3' feet in height in the 30' foot sided triangle. CRITERIA 18.800 NARRATVE: A 1/2 street improvement is required per the city engineer and this development will be as per the city of Tigard development standards. Please note that the neighbors attending the neighborhood meeting would prefer that the street remain its charm and not have a 1/2 street improvement island created. They were concerned more about the undersized culvert on Coral Street between 92th and 90th Street. Nov.-30-99 12: 21P Waite' i_ Knapp 503- '6-4349 P_O1 Wafter H.Knapp Silviculture 6 Fors:Management Urban Fa,vsUry 7615 SW Duns,nulr Lane Beaverton.OR 57007 Phone:603448434$ Fat:6034414349 • To: Ken Rasmussen From Walter H. Knapp Faye: 503-749-4950 Dotal November 30, 1999 Moms Pagoss a —— Rot Tree Preservation Plan CC. See attached. Nov-30-99 12 : 21P Waite `-i. Knapp 503 16-4349 P_O2 Rasmussen Project Tree Protection & Removal Plan Prepared for Ken Rasmussen 603 SW Larkspur Ct. Sublimity, OR 97385 Prepared by: Walter H. Knapp C.'errifred Forester,SAP Certified Arborisi- 7615 SW Dunsmuir Ln. Beaverton, OR 97007 iffiY141 Date; Novanbc'r 30, 1999 Nov-30-99. 12 : 22P Waite' 1. Knapp 503• 6-4349 P . 03 Rasmussen Draft TPP November 30, 1999 Page 1 SUMMARY Most of the trees at the Rasmussen project will be retained on the site. Some of these trees arc very large and close to construction activities. As a result, specific protection measures have been specified to ensure preservation of the trees. Because all of the non-hazardous trees larger than 12 inches in diameter are being retained, mitigation will not be required to meet City of Tigard tree code. THE SITE The Rasmussen project is located on the north side of SW Coral Street in Tigard, Oregon. The property slopes gently to the south. An existing house and several smaller structures remain on the site. TREES Both native and non-native trees are scattered on the site. As shown on the tree inventory (table 1), some of the largest specimens exceed 3 feet in diameter. Although most trees are in good condition, one walnut has substantial heart rot and should be removed. All of the S non-hazardous trees larger than 12 inches in diameter are planned for retention. As a result, there will be no mitigation requirement under the City of Tigard tree code. Wafter II. Knapp Silviculture and Pores:Management Urban forestry 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane, Beaverton. OR 97007 Phone/Fax(503)646-4349 Nov-30-99 12 : 22P Walte -I. Knapp 503• '-6-4349 P. 04 Rasmussen Draft TPP .V)vemher 30, 1999 Page 2 Table 1 . Tree inventory for the Rasmussen project, Tigard, OR . -- Tree Species DRH Comments Rx No. Common Narne Scientific Name [in] 1 black locust Kobinia pseudoacacia 36 fair condition retain 2 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 18 fair condition retain 3 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 heart rot ,remove 4 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 fair condition retain 5 English walnut Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain 6 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36 good condition retain 7 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 42 good condition retain 8 plum 'Prunus.,pp. 8 good condition retain 9 spruce Picea spp. 26 good condition retain [north of site] 10 English walnut Juglans regia 14 fair condition retain 11 English walnut Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain Total number of trees: 11 Trees larger than 12 inches in diameter: Total number: 9 Hazardous: 1 Non-hazard: 8: Retained: 1 100% 89 TREE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS Tree retention on the site will require special considerations. 1 he folltnvinx measures are recommended for adoption: • Designation of Tree Protection Area. Prior to any site clearing or excavation, the project arborist will identify and physically mark on the ground the location of the tree protection area. (The tree protection Walter H. Knapp Silviculture and Forest Management Urban Forestry 7615 SWDunsmuirLane, Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone/Pax(503)646-4349 Nov-'30-99, 12 : 22P Wa 1 tey 1 . Knapp 503- 6-4349 P. 05 Rantuusen Draft TPP November 30, 1999 Page 3 area is generally described as the area beneath the "dripline" of the tree (the outer extension of the tree crown); however, location may vary in the field due to species or site considerations, Tree roots frequently extend outside the dripline of the tree for considerable distances.) • Fencing. The most important protection standard is fencing to restrict access by construction equipment, storage of materials, or other activities within the tree protection area. On this site, chain link fencing will be used in the location specified by the project arborist. (See "designation of tree protection area.") • Signage. Weatherproof signage will be installed identifying the tree protection area and listing the name and telephone number of the project arborist as the contact person. • Mulching. If it is necessary for equipment to enter the tree protection area, a layer of gravel or other suitable mulch at least 6 inches deep will be placed in the path of the equipment as temporary protection for the root system of the affected tree(s). This material will need to be removed at the end of construction. • Storage of Equipment. Construction equipment will be stored in suitable locations away from the tree(s). • Soil Protection. The stripping of topsoil around the tree(s) will be restricted. No fill will be placed within the tree protection area unless specific"tree-friendly" design, engineering, and construction practices are followed. These can include tree wells, protection walls, and other designed features as recommended by the project arborist. • Excavation. Excavation immediately adjacent to roots larger than two Walter 11.Knapp Silviculture and 1 unst Alanagcmau Urban Forettry 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane, Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone/Tar(503)646-4349 •Nov-30-99 12 : 22P Wa1te i_ Knapp 503 16-4349 P . 06 Rasmussen Draft i!TPP November 30, 1999 Page 4 inches in diameter within the tree protection area will be by hand to ensure that roots are not damaged. Where feasible, major roots will be protected by tunneling or other means to avoid destruction or damage, Where soil grade changes affect the tree protection area, the grade line should be meandered wherever feasible. This will require on-site coordination to ensure a reasonable balance between engineering, construction, and the need for tree protection. • Site and Structure Design. Locations of buildings and infrastructure will be modified where feasible to reduce impacts to trees, Where buildings must be located close to trees, modifications to standard construction methods will be incorporated, including such measures as grade beam foundations and cantilevered walls. Such measures are likely in the vicinity of the two large Douglas-fir trees, • Documentation. The project arborist will provide written assurance that the protective measures have been installed. • Quality Assurance. The project arbonst will supervise proper execution of the Plan through construction of all buildings and other structures that encroach on retained trees. CONCLUSIONS Retention of trees on this site will help to maintain the character of the site as a part of new development. Close adherence to the tree protection standards will be needed. It will be especially important that the project arborist provide on-site assurance of tree protection during critical parts of the development. Walter H. Knapp Silviculture and Forest Management Urban Forestry 7615 SW Dunsinuir Lane, Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone/Fax(503)646-4349 Min rilimos ?- 11. \91 f. 1 ot-1-- C-sr- Pft,,K.ArA ,Joc rt ISM - LAnot-rd.,laRn/ L2-- Z-) 3441 s C►i4-to oti Gib"4 cam. C_7- U 6nA- r f._wt.‘.1 n L7- 5 Aursto Art r - (� e Z {o 4qc_ PD CZ\ S . -- t AEIP-t- -7 - C CU �C r `f AA6 p( c-1Atir 2-4o 90n4" 4 ckkLv5nr S ro e,E ItLs 0 p,•., Q n4 P. p..MCS nice* S, ')-( 1Sa}4 CA4LurArtr y••.4 S 01% -wb 1 •6 1i`SmEer oo I r — 14--Cetbisisb TrUCCiL S 4EED . \--t"` q. I 1 9GAt.trl USlb-46 fiv Arlo w rho-to 5Ef LAA.141—cats Gai.16. m 4.4061. n , 14A Me A-D4t EIS \)14t)t-1 E it- �,„A 1 , i cam - - v- iv - i./ 9,33,5"_d'aJ r d__e .c, 3 -� 7�J- ("X-dt- )14 6-v--)- --- 5- 9 Y I / 5 14) ,-;,-,a.R, -61-e7/- 4) 0 2 Pst-y q 2s5- iw Cotep l y -y/oc - ae,r, 97ss SaJ �%- //se- -1- 3rortid T111111111 a 1 --;-.. . ZIW \/ ,''''"v21 E 11111111 iii el i1ipg E[ Ire 1 oig Luc Arl f hi i! Ltd!! i 1;1 I II -. .- I NEM : - r. : ja ir 77(21..‘911k .0•001 -- I .7. g 1 P W ."- 04 t• ' ...... !sr') 1 ..t.„,___.4--- —w. I 7— tl ' ... I 1 C I ' t/�__ C n l'. 1- 7::7 :-:=7----7 -. ':-'-.7;.. l ., ..... wa. R inkm -mmimm MAIM! ° I ii 1.......d :: 13...11 .. o O ,Q+1 MM•••1100Ii'irly rf►_„_S .■■■■■....■.■....■••■•02 • 111 iiIiiiii Ilii—M\ ''AirOSSICT —Afar°lifir I NassnwsvN,— I II 11111111 till •Aal p, * M .:.-.......-:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ...•:.:.:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:.:-..*.......* • • • • •• • . . ................ II . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 j olo •• ' " ' '-*-•.:.::: 1 i 1 04 I \T I 1 I ut 1 04 i IMO 1\ ii Ai, 1 , 11\1 0 l'::::•:•%:.: ! 8 1 1 04 0 e \t A 0 t I •-•E ii.v7 qg.'r • .-...-:.:-:-:-:. _. . ...f. &I .1--", ... ........... I No ::..1...:„..........*:.' .. . .... ........ ji, .. _ ..-:.. I 0000 fiA\71.i.•:::,::: , • 0000 : 2 040, . ••-• • "A 4 • il i4" .....?,•, : 1 114 . : its . . . It:::•:•:::::• I 6 1 , • •••• ••••:....j 11 1•:::::::::•:•:. ..•:•:::::::::*: OM • 1 0 0 % 0 00 otob ...zt. U * rnfr.) rrncnc:" 4 meow.looditram. -.44s• man' ••• Ot I•C•M*AMMO., .c.01 ,i,1,• I // it ,. I .. ' 1 / ..... 1 • ..• " 1 .... 1 ..." .•••• ...• E ..••••• i: .•••••.‘i ...10.-... 1 et..••• .J•••••••• .....-..-- .!- gj ....--- 1...•••*/ /4101 .. i t x !* • 5 __.) 11/0:./99 TCE 16:22 FAX 5035897407 _ — 001 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ft)) Liberty Plaza Suite 340 285 Liberty Street.N.E. kg (503)381-1211 Salem,Oregon 97301 FAX 589-7407 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TO: NAME:,A n 1lrT_,;-1?w.SSe✓,.1 FIRM: //z ' e./ �ap y f sZ 5 DATE: FROM: Donna Schneider, Commercial Escrow Officer • RE: l /7-5- s ) V / FAX NO: ,527 3 - y45; Number of Pages (including cover sheet): COMMENTS: 02,0)2z/k21--44' Zi:e. /2-f4e/24-7-1, - This facsimile may contain CONFIDENTIAL information. If the reader of this message is not the recipient named above or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile to the intended recipient, please do not distribute the facsimile. Instead, please notify us immediately by telephone and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. 11/02/99 TUE 16:22 FAX 5035897407 �� yy� 11002• 11/02/99 14:04 Fla 20246011 _ OTIC Q_. szi ORZGON TITLE INSURANCE CDMPANY 5933 NE win Sivers Drive Portland, OR 97220 Phone/Fax Number= (503) 262-4643; FAX 262-4695 ATTN : Donna COMPANY: Salem FAX NO. : Number of pages (including this sheet) : 9 FROM g Molly Malone DATE = November 2, 1999 Following is the TRIO for Rasmussen. please feel free to call if you have any questions . Thank you, Molly *tff*{*tai*t**,r+e: I ° This facsimile may contain CONFIDENTIAL information. If the reader of this message is not the recipient named above or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile to the intended recipient, please do not distribute ; this facsimile. Instead, please notify us immediately by telephone, at the number above, and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. i ' 11/02/99 TUE 16:23 FAX 503589"07 003 _ _ _ —. — —_ - OTIC TO i CEh[ ��r 11/02/99 14:04 PA$ x¢24496 j = KETAOsc lr PROPERTY PROFT LE = wa 'gton (OR) 4a4##**i*iai*#*".tk**#*atr:r**=t airl7l**t#at•k*****aa **a sale##i*#.r 1.r**!**aaaa********#*#�1M * 4.* OWNERSHIP INFORMATION a * * OWNERSHIP ..� * a a * * Reference Parcel #' i 12 6DC 03700 RT3Qt Glw - 012 - 26 - SE lc Parcal Number a pawner : gasmussezi Mildred L Tr * i * CoOvner - * Site Address : 9376 SW Coral St Tigard 972230= 97395 a . Mail Addres9 : 6)3 SW Larkspur Ct Sublimity Telephone :Cromer: Tenant: 503-24 4-9091 a a T* SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * m.Pp a....�.° x Transferred :05/05/1998 Loan Amount : :47094 Lender t r Document # Leah Type * Sale Price * a Deed Type : Interest Rate * * % Otrned a Vesting Type * * _ .cx=n .. * ASSESSMENT AND TAX T FQP. TIoN * Y * * HktLaad ; $76,700 Exempt Amount ** * Mktstructures $32r110 Exempt Type :30 a MktOther improved : 02381 Z MktTotal : $108,810 Levy Code , a 98-99 Taxes : $1, 172- 96 School Diet :Tigard a Assessed Tot: 576;970 * s.,w.=.r_____ .�� a * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION a * x a bap Grid : 655 El Class Code :R13 a a Cansue :Tract: 309.00 Block :1 a NbrhdCd :Wem2 MillRate *15. 2174 a Sub/Plat :Lehmann Acres a a Y Land Use : 1014 Rea, Improved a * Legal : LEHMANN ACRE TRACT, eLOC1G Dr LOT PT a a :2, ACRES -43 * ** a * -.e... .._..a...,,.,.... ** O. PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * # # * Bedrooms :2 Lot Acres : .43 Year Built : 1930 * Bathrooms . t1-00 Lot Sggt :18,730 EffYearBlt : 1930 * Floor Cover 'None a * Heat Method :Stove 81m 9F Foundation :Masonry * * Pool 1 • 38 mu nf in3F Roof Shape* Appliance' P BsmLov9F a w Dishwasher I Bldg SqFt : 1,230 Roof Matl :Comp Shingle a * Hood Fan : - 1stElrSq�et :780 InteriorMat *Drywall Paving Matl : a a Deck I s Porch DpperF1SE Const Type tWdstud\No Shtg * Garage Type ; Porch sq t T * Garage SP Attic SgFt :450 'Ext Finish :245 1r a Deck Sq!t s 1 : ` The �or;aetion Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But YS Nat senseurmed, i**t#***a**rwt::## #a3wa*fr***r,irl:*�r* f .,..a -__ .,..I,_- ._._ n It ,41/1„_, dAM_ l_ ,..n_ ,=4_h,q,r�r. u . All an.. p rill I Z4 —4 i I s 11 - gl H II I 111$ -1 ' ...• u, .j.„.j.„ t. 1. . ",.... I ow. . . .11,-.1,... --L -9.----1 1 Ilin 1 MI'3/Ir fle MBA h . J" ` _M ;- + . �� IN ` r � w O 4t . Ili•m t / .11 lerMilMati, 44 RI el I . 1- ilri., ' •' .4., . . -.-: 1---=— • ,w — a tm p, � `' g 2- dE; - I 1 � . a 1 3 II ; ? 1� )1 114 14 44 ill 4k i x,11 01 Ail V.t n .rt.' net_ _ �,. �"' 2 D af1N3Av Pule 11331110 9:1l7'1'1301 M 1 k a 2 6 rim =L ,..•• '' i1 `� It I z Q a F Y T�1 ; J . b L1 iC u �, i 4 �1 94 of u 'p -� ° - u LL a...a ,.t■ .a•1q, -, a /"IP V j I O u..i _ bp 1 -1 . r I g ,� , a. r ,• I a IMO NE M ICI w 22 h / t , p . :��� _ 1 �� b . O o 11 .�i � �� E4 i }1 14 m --/. .gut +"r UZ • ,� n7 eat yin- 0 � i l :1;r rn / ci. .-. c I ii•.._ • 11/0:/99 TUE 16:24 FAX 503589'07 — — — LEM ,�;...J./ X1005 11/o2/99 14:05 FAX 2_ g18S QTIc TO j• .T _ - -.. _ ct- gras or WOO' • i � e+i .T:ar d e r♦�wrd 00ga of A • ••' R ma TY �4 es- Me WrYCgok - Ooe : osos7094.1 ae.oe vat.: 108129 • as/Of/look ois 1s:55pa, 1, v 1 • •1 • • • • 1 11/02/99 TUE 16:24 FAX 5035897407 — — LEN ,�.,, Z 006.. 11/O2199 14:05 FAX 2624895 OTT; TO ' _ - • ti .1. `N Altor lseorsding,o nano to: Until a camp le requcetod. •ail ta= mama nein be met so me ftrllow �. �_ eddasaK _. gf.igl t 011aMaae X^.-••■• ligalLaltiOL ........ � AOR CON$IDERATW N of thee=of no doh moos the impose of this Msittet00ret Is to itrearkr Anima's hrrerct to the 1Llidtad L.. Raididadel Remelt living a Ton dad December 1o, 1991. - • ASI3NQL Dotuld D. 3tannuo en sand Mildred L.Raaaualea.Unbend and wia • do herevy sign. a:soda and set owe to • - ASSIGN1OR:Mtldmc-L Iltratnusren. Trustee of ffia Mildred L Rosman a Rovaebk Living This dated Dlcr 10. 1997. All of AastzThor't right.Ude and items is and to dim cocain Real Dame CoOttant laud ldsy:3. 1914 berets= I• s. a sr . Z� E.Nesetnny anst ltutb L Newtray. Bed • BUYER-, Seaaatb L. liansunson. Dori* Ban uuseo. Doald D. Daces and a )dildaud 1..Bentauaeat. • a Memorandum at wnieb Co ra<aa was recorded on May 25, 1964 In due Waeldngu Cimty. theme deed*wefts under recaoding Wfaa®oe 64020057. A senor Reaber conveys eb= falievirg real prows,located in Wailing=County, Oregon des ribed in din above Gaol Egan COMM to Asalpom Ina 2, Bleat D. LANK ACRE TRAIT. Waddatm Como J. • !Megan. EX PANG 113 ROM Ilse liad bt flat tumor inovvy'O 1 `' . . - 03 Myrna E.Newbtoy. of vt. by dart monied May 15. 1969 in Boole 743. Pane 483, Raoul' of Wsabiogons Ceund.Oregon. • i • Aagmr rvaaaoot ti>Qt A Ilia Oc f le tanster the dace_ • Page 1 - £aead.eederre aE cnocreat sod Rarg*is aged 3414 Deadr TMoinsuaRQOael_ I xl.ldred Iteenuesea Treat r - 1 1 1 - 1/02/99 TUE 16:24 FAX 5035897407 11/02/99 14:05 FAX 2624695 4. X007 IC TO _ LEA T �t r.14. • , , herein by reference. '�; :- - The ptoNSloN of the Coatlact ate iaaoppotp E TIM 1NL•.TRUMENT WILL NOT ALI.ow USE OP THE p oFEa DESCR LAWS IBED IN IHE - � MST:MIT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. SIGNIN ACCEPTING THIS G THE MASON p FEB Tr1LE TOTI8 QTY SHOULD CH> ITI1 THE • APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10 VELi11Y APPROVED oR FOREST PRACT1�SDDEFINED IN ORS 30.930. ORS 93.040(1)AGAINST pA, 1IiO TUE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NCrls Hli WITHIN A FIRE PRO EC•1'ION DIS'T'RICT'PROTECT NG STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT . TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, MITCE,IN FARM OR FOREST ZONES MAY Ncrr Aunioter8 CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OP A RESIDENCE AND WITCH LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 IN ALL ZOI1EB. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING IIBS INSTRUMENT,TIM PERSON ACQUIRING FEB TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD C1'3BCH WITH THIS USES MID EXISTENCE OF FIRE PRO''ECTI POR STRUCTURES. ORS APPROVED 0 2) DATED: Paccaber 10. 1997. . Dank'D.Raamneeoa ... I►Mildiid L • STATE OF oR8cioN ) . )Ia Can*of Marion 1 • Oa a 104 day of Dacia, 1997,palatally$PPCU Wino me Um within" aimed Donald D.Itannossoo sad Madrid d I-. Itaminolcia and acknowledged said lami noot to 1 • be Melt.giaie raluaaary act and deed. .----e- Before m,a , NOTARY FOR ORI •I• 8 Y pQppmhN MCI, D r w Zags Y issaart of Coattcsct ani Bargain sad Sale IMrd: *3 • . _ madred Maatlaaea inapt . .iy . . . .. " . .. '1/02/99 TUE 16:25 FAX 5035897407 _ 008 11/02i99 14:08 FAX 2624695 OTIC„ :.• TO _ •' - 'psi/ __ - Y tl.•:?'+- r,,y� 2r' _' -_ _... _ � - I/'• 'I. - r ' _� - .. •� ■fir .;'!�'�.`..'L!(t_�_Y""r'� �,.•( « _l. � 91021389 i p.e7 , ` IMONPMYIOe Wunfp i-y r , s psnd Tat Stateraenta to: , Ate Recording Return ZO1 aemaln the Earle n Gila A. DOW1►ai Schulte, Anderson, oc ai ' 811 5_ G_ Ptont, 5th Floe[ [ ME Portland, Oregon 57204 �- tiFD17!! PAM ONSET TO Co14'rR CT tM7 0! A PROPERTY O SA x11 WE' This Memorandum is of on Amendment to the Contract of �� VSE sale of Real property, wbich amendment is dated affectiVe MAY Le a a� 1991, by and t•etwewn M. B. Reeds y and R�taoe.RenoethY, ,. '� bereinafter referred to a■ the tellers.' Rumudaa, Darla Aassussea, Don d D. Rasmussen and Mildred L. - _ Resmueeen, heseinadter referred o as the wFurchaaere.' a,.f —_, On may 23, 19ea seller end Purchasers entered into setleca Contract of sale o.e Real Prope ani effective nay ~ and Purabesers entered into an ailment to that19ontrn the A ��"�' 71 Nemorand4m waehington Co the Contract was corded snap ataehingtvn County, GrogeCl deed COr4a under eeeoediD9 eeletence !. 84020057. Under the eontreet, 11ere agreed to sell to Purchasers, iiPW and Purchasers agreed to perch ' e from Sellers, upon opethu (the 'fir _� conditions set tot:h therein t following '• 'Property') in the County of W1 hin/1ton and State of oregon: - :, I Dot 2, Block 0, mammy AiCR7 TRACT, Washington _ _R County, Oregon, RXCEPTING THEREFROM the Bast S4 — Ceet thereof oonveyed' to Myron E. N eeDren et �. •— ux, by dead recorded MV 15, 1969 in Sock 743, __, { , m page 443, Records of liahh1 u'9ton county. Oregon rd s=ate Under the contract ae Lmended the unpaid balance o1 the -�i� -^;�,,1 purchase pride is -;31.912.07 ad of hay 1, 1991, boars interest at `�SF. ,i,,; 108 per annum end la payYable with interest in3monthly inital1aents x_11 of at least 342.93 each with he enelze urp �c aealetiud itlterost die on or be to MAY 1, 2006. �,t6, _ _ Tuts rysTADNEST WILL ALLOW 0SE OF TEA PROPERTY :` ii° DEsCRlttD Id TETA INSTRUMENT VIOLATION OP APPLICWLL,6 La ND DEC __- LAw8 AND REGULATIOL8S. B®PORE 'SIGNING OR AccRPTING THIS' r�"� INDTRW ENT, TEE PB'RSOd ;zeta: Lac FCC TITLE TO THE PROPER'T'Y SHOULD _ C E 1 NITE 0985pkIAT8 CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO :4'=---- .) -�� TEE no/PEATY DESCRIIRD IN T618 INSTRUMENT MAX ROT 61 WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P DT3 TIM0 STA[1CTO8.RS. THE eeL. PROPERTY IS Suo.7ECT TO LAND US$ LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WRICH, IX _ FARM OR FORMAT 2ON69, CLAY NOT€71dTaORIEE COl18TRDCTIoN OR SI'PINO OF A RRSIDR110E. BEFORE SIGNING RR ACCEPTING TdIS INSTRUAENT, TUB __ WFIREON ACQUIRING rEB TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CMECX KITH THE +y 1 — MEMORANDUM OF Ny811P11B0T fan CONTAAC'T OF SALE OP REAL =_ '- _ PROPERTY (0601C) .. _ I • 1 . '.1/02/99 TUE 16:25 FAX 5035897407_ f�009` 11/02/99 14:08 FAX 2824898 OTIC TO __•'` x : .'TES' t . J.. M. isY APPSO4'Ea . -i r.ti_• i APYAOPhIATE CITY OR COUNTY pyANNING DEPARTED NTCTORV =''r` -.i:. USSR 7.MD exissetics or ei� exczsctL0 PoR ;. ec ell Ssass ��*• seLLr.Rst Lyh -•---- ' °� pate n{{th A. Rt6onlssen �+f x_ K. N■v ny it 1 ;q Rut L. New LOY fltL; • + r. 1r �-r.� g. ■■an =.-.. ._— Mildred L. A3 ,.:, V�7., • _ty.1e—;-743;. ■d before{ s �� "� 3 Ins foregoing instrument was acknowl�94 �,-�- - ==m m b [i1_�G 4brcy and Guth L. sesbr■y this sr day of •- _,.. Apt i . �'°. ?ski —:yam Sr,-;�? n°• Note u c rayon "'t My Commiseioa e441 w ao1WG } -- .' g?ATB OF WISDOM 1. a�:�. count:. of -�' = r--.:d T e foregoing f.nstrumont war acknowledged Deforu _ .: �J� me by Kenneth A. gasmucssn end Darla Rasmesaen this— $9!►+1 4my a '''t i rig April. 1991. -- Ho ary Pu 1 c a r°9o^ ' s=ATE oB OREGON ) g as ena1N F 4 'rho focagoing inatrum■ ms••• me Dv Doneid P. Aa+ousa°p 403 Milar -d L. Rsrmueeen this _ ---1 day of April. 1991. • g124= fission S=y raB9all _.... •• :.:y Cocak+oa =dl V.•1 MMMO_ODU(0 or AMEND T TO CONTRACT or BALK OF RYkL PROPERTY • ► Z. '' i _ r rr-_ �•-` -_ 1 .. 11/02/99 TUE 16:26 FAX 503589/107 4 ... •ftI4-4 11/02/99_ 14:07 FAX 2824 OTIC TO EK 895 i --- —:--- ...---___.-----• ...--.. _ - , — - _.. .. -..- .- .....' . ..• ..-1).=...:-. ... 72-1-----•.;...., - _ ......,...- • - - - ---. ..-.-. - -.4.:1,, • • . - _.mt. ,. kil,...... • - -I.;. - ._- •• - Fw ma-..: • 6:,...::... ors. "• a 77:1, ....— 4itilitzi4. grl -,==1,7•E , ,, IRV': , wi.cliosi , Is i -• A i 7 I i4:27---- -.r...a....-- I. M .811E-=-_20 SPI!! Pi:Jtf „L---- . awit it. Ex. •. 0▪ E,— Ir• ": - 1 .a. • '- - . ! :'.* .N3. 1 ....:-.... .p.' A....It. 9r 4t. a • V. rl` OAK OP 01W.001111 Li , • } so .7 , • targatygot rirmogeos . ,-• I, •••••• ..7....p.-.3 •-..—..; ! I-.1•19,It H .....• - of Assou..1,11 --- ...•■••••-■17 .; WirlIflea•ifif • . •i • 1411■1 7.::"." r•■■•••!%1Edi the wilhin . ArtAia.r., _ . B ."-- , ma:goo -. • ' - unly. - L.,......z .' *1./.•.14e,e■ani- .0..-r 's:! _ —.--- .... ..11:4,7.4,737.. cor It —_,... . 41 • " . .... MEM 0111164. -----. 000 t 92022319 —.----._ Root: 633110 a3.00 .. OA/19/1091 0420.725PH . . _—......-- i 3 ... , _ , • .. . • . .. _. . - - • .... •• • . 1 . - . • . . • . . . .. _: . .. . . . .6... ...—".... ."-- a.... . .*•.•■••••••■•••• ; - • ! . 11/09/99 TUE 11:38 FAX 5035897407 [J001 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY fib Liberty Plaza Suite 340 285 Liberty street,N.E. (503)361-1211 Salem,Oregon 97301 FAX 689-7407 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TO: NAME: / DATE: t( 9/4'1" FROM Donna Schneider. Commercial Escrow Officer RE: r'3 f 5Ce) / 57— FAX NO: 23 y9 - c Number of Pages (including cover sheet): /D L. ***********fit***********tkMr*7ktkaf***********fr7t***** COMMENTS: ZA 4, a- c,. el„„ (t7) This facsimile may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, If the reader of this message is not the recipient named above or an employee responsible for delivering the facsimile to the intended recipient, please do not distribute the facsimile. Instead, please notify us immediately by telephone and return this facsimile by mail. Thank you. 11/09/99 TUE 11:38 FAX 5035897407 t1 002 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 85 Liberty Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 (503) 361-1211 FAX (503) 589-7407 KEN RASMUSSEN NOVEMBER 9, 1999 PO BOX 110 9493 PORTER RD AUMSVILLE, OR 97325 Escrow No . : 506946x Re : PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT Property : 9375 SW CORAL ST TIGARD, OR 97223 Ken: Attached please find a copy of the preliminary title report on the above referenced property. Please note that the vesting is still in the Newbreys with the contract of sale to you and your wife along with Donald and Mildred. Exception 9b shows that you and your wife assigned your interest in the contract to Darla Rasmussen, Trustee of the Darla Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated September 30, 1997 . Exception 9c shows that Donald and Mildred assigned their interest to Mildred L. Rasmussen, Trustee of the Mildred L. Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated December 10, 1997 . I previously sent you a copy of the memorandum of contract showing you purchasing the property as individuals . If no further changes are made, when the contract is paid off, the deed will go to the two trustees of the trusts and not to any of the individuals . The proof of ownership that you need for the site development review are the two "assignments of contract and bargain and sale deeds" along with the memorandum of contract. The signers would then be Darla and Mildred as trustees of the trusts . Please call me if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance . Sincerely, n 4-in,r-cSc,v Donna G. Schneider Commercial Escrow Officer 11/09/99 TUE 11:39 FAX 5035897407 1 003 gr.)) OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Title Operations Branch 5933 NE Win Sivers Drive Portland, OR 97220 (503) 262-4600; FAX 262-4695 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FOR ISSUING TITLE INSURANCE Date Prepared: November 8, 1999 OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY LIBERTY PLAZA SUITE 340 285 LIBERTY STREET NE SALEM, OREGON 97301 Attn: Donna G. Schneider Reference: ORDER NO : 765173w PARTY REF: RASMUSSEN PROP ADDR: 9375 SW Coral Street Tigard, OR 97223 OTHER REF: OREGON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY is prepared to issue title insurance, insuring title of the land shown on Schedule A, subject 'to the exceptions shown on Schedule B. The proposed policy or policies and indorsements are shown on Schedule A. Issuance of the policy or policies is conditioned on payment of the full premiums, and on recordation of satisfactory instruments establishing the interests of the parties to be insured. This report is based on the condition of title as of the effective date shown on Schedule A. Matters arising after the effective date may affect this report . New exceptions will appear for matters arising through the proposed transaction. Any change in the amount of insurance or type of coverage may cause the premium to change. This report is for the exclusive use of the principals to the contemplated transaction, and the company does not have any liability to any third parties. Until all necessary documents are placed of record, the company reserves the right to cancel, amend or supplement this preliminary title report for any reason. Any questions concerning this preliminary title report may be directed to: Donna G. Schneider 11/09/99 TUE 11:39 FAX 5035897407 2004 SCHEDULE A, Page No. 1 Order No. 765173w 1. The effective date of this preliminary title report is 5:00 P.M. on October 29, 1999 2. The policies and indorsements to be issued and the related charges are; Policy/Indorsement Description Charge ALTA Extended Lender' s for STo Come Lender Indors.#52 (100) ;59 (116) ;83 .1(8.1) 50.00 Government Service Fee 20.00 3 . Fee simple interest in the land described in this report is owned, at the effective date, by: M.E. NEWBREY AND RUTH NEWBREY, as tenants by the entirety 4. The land referred to in this report is described as follows: Lot 2, Block D, LEFfl1ANN ACRE TRACT, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the East 84 feet thereof conveyed to Myron E. Newbrey, et ux, by deed recorded May 15, 1969, in Book 743, Page 483, Records of Washington County, Oregon. , 11/09/99 TUE 11:39 FAX 5035897407 [1 005 Order No. 765173w Effective Date: 5:00 P.M. on October 29 1999 SCHEDULE B, Page No. 1 Except for the items properly cleared through closing, the proposed policy or policies will not insure against loss or damage which may arise by reason of the following: 1 . Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3 . Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances, not shown by the public records; unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights or claims or title to water. 4 . Any lien, or right to a lien, for taxes, worker's compensation, services, labor, equipment rental or material, heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 6 . Taxes for the year 1999-00 Original Amount $1,123.88 Special Assessment $ 9.21 Tax Amount $1,133.09 Unpaid Balance $1,133.09 plus interest, if any. Code No. 023 .81 Key No. 8238843 Map No. 1S126DC-03700 7. Municipal liens, if any, imposed by the City of Tigard. NOTE; An inquiry has been directed to the City Clerk, and subsequent advice will follow concerning the actual status of such liens. No search has been made or will be made for water, sewer or storm drainage charges unless the City claims them as liens and reflects them on its lien docket on or before the date of closing. Buyers should check with the appropriate City bureau or water and sewer district and obtain a final reading. Such charges are not adjusted in escrow. 8. The subject property lies within the boundaries of the Unified Sewerage Agency and is subject to the levies and assessments thereof. (None as of October 29, 1999.) (Continued) 11/09/99 TUE 11:40 FAX 5035897407 Z006 SCHEDULE B. Page No. 2 Exceptions, Continued Order No. : 765173w 9. Unrecorded Contract of Sale, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon examination of the original contract, a memorandum of which was, Recorded May 25, 1984 as Recorder's Fee No. 84020057 Seller(s) M.E. Newbrey and Ruth L. Newbrey Euyer(s) Kenneth A. Rasmussen and Darla Rasmussen, husband and wife, as to an undivided one-half interest, and Donald D. Rasmussen and Mildred L. Rasmussen, husband and wife, as to an undivided one-half interest Amount $45, 000.00 9a. The terms of the above contract were modified by instrument, Recorded April 29, 1991 as Recorder's Fee No. 91021389 9b. The buyer's interest in said Contract of Sale was assigned by instrument, Recorded October 7, 1997 as Recorder's Fee No. 97093783 From Kenneth A. Rasmussen and Darla Rasmussen, husband and wife To Darla Rasmussen, Trustee of the Darla Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated September 30, 1997 9c. The buyer's interest in said Contract of Sale was assigned by instrument, Recorded May 5, 1998 as Recorder' s Pee No. 98047094 From Donald D. Rasmussen and Mildred L. Rasmussen, husband and wife To . Mildred L. Rasmussen, Trustee of the Mildred L. Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated December 10, 1997 NOTE; we find no judgments, federal or state tax liens against: Darla Rasmussen, Trustee of the Darla Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated September 30, 1997, Mildred L. Rasmussen, Trustee of the Mildred L. Rasmussen Revocable Living Trust dated December 10, 1997, Ken Rasmussen, Darla Rasmussen, Donald D. Rasmussen or Mildred L. Rasmussen. Ryan S. wood. Title Officer PAW/pdy cc: Ken Rasmussen 11/09/99 TUE 11:40 FAX 5035897407 007 1201 Io 700 >�o w 2381 I J4+-- !T90 N.11•srwI. 9625 i 1005 ��`'�` f ccs�g�i III ao.�' - ��/a >� 1004 1003 I 1002 1001 1100 .o s I 3S4e_ -Si Qc ■ 1 .•u 4c .3S4c 'RSfc 1102 • Y • •7800 St_... ..�• I I X�c a.& 7800 fO06 a•( 3 . 1 2 t �s00g I 1 1101 • C . . `' r I\JI• s"'"- 140 LEHMANN SQUAW' iy • 1w.s• .e LEHMAN c.a.Ne 41. Z51.2 '4 3302 0 - . 3 300 30'k TdAa 3 0 3 P.204c c 3002 JTAa >c 5 OA 1 8 II . A C I 1 , F.' 8; b .•z_s• i 3500 Ito. J .mss0 3�6Oo D A3 j00 3701 38c0'ul' OIL s7 •J444 -tsac 1 t 013 1C1110.11490) I 0) ' an>,. LE 3900 2 1 .�Adi Q < J f P asad __�_,�_�_ 11..11• *LW 1 . Cl I W 1 11.11 ,W $ C e. lase ... CORAL 1 II(1.1. tU •_ M• q•r. 45 a "r`.s.I SC-711-7--1-4i-048' -i 1a�.,1• At .774E g 4200 4100 �t°� �Tqp� s.1r•I .SSAG 1 SAS. ; .264e ICAa• Y A 1 -• I- � 9 = r? 0 {-= eLW tais• 1 1 4 aA01 - 744o.s ' 301 S 3 2 .jfa c 500100 5101 - »4,' . `.38gs 3dac 6800 i L Z. 5 t► ..PO : � .j p� w ch1 on Agnn . z 5201 , THIS MAP IS MADE SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING SAID PREMISES,AND THE ltir COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR VARIATIONS, IF ANY,IN DIMENSIONS,AREAS.AND LOCATIONS ASCERTAINED BY ACTUAL SURVEY. 4). 11/09/99 TUE 11:40 FAX 5035897 07 008 • • 1b --1. 1 q3061-5733 Mir tecotdlnlf, RCM la: MITI a champ la squared, all ILA 1 Q mueawa is shall be aim m tL. followlr� vp address: 1 POR CONsMRRAT7ON or the tuns or on dollars slats the porpuse of Oils dstad in s Ito bander Armistices interim to he Dada 1a, u knead*L Trost ) 1.'.-P* ASSIGNOR: Routh A. Stasuwasen sad Darla Rasatuaseo, hothead sad r+rifv do hereby assign. utsarar sad rot over to ASSIGNER: Darla Raarottason, Truster of tiro Dena Rastouaaut l aiocaNa Livias Thud dated Sapoaiaber 30. 1997. All of Atli .r�, pricer right,title end icrareat in and to that certain Adel Butte Coetract dated May 23, 1984 between 9P: 24.B. N.wbtey and Rtub L Nevrbrey.sad BUYER: Kenneth L Raamussaa, Dula Ramona. Danld D. Rama*mad MUM L. Rsarnuasmt, a Matiaraadtua of which Contract was reburial on May u, 1964 to the Wadrhtrm Quinsy, Oregoo decd records ander recording rvfoterta g40200S7. Aasigoor further conveys ilia fallowing real property locoed is Washko.toe may, Organ described In the above Real Estate Comma to Assign= Lot 2,Nock D,LEHMAYN ACRE TRACT,Washltijtoa Courtly,Oregon, EXCEPTING THEREFROM Cho Eau 84 feat Ammar cgtwyad to Myron S Newbrey, m us, by dead recorded o IS, 1969 la Book 743, Paso 483, Rx�orris of Whop Assignor a'arttnts that Asslgaor has the right to transfer rho memo. The Provisions of the Comas(are irrourpocatoe bank by a{ap warora IAwar lw • C0114 • • ..I • : II. : - 11109/99 TUE 11:41 FAX 50358! 07 Z009 ti THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALUM USE OP THE PROPERTY DEED IN TNR RNTST1U[8NT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE STONING 01 ACCBp1 D Q THiI INITRUMw r,111B PERSON ACQUIRING FEB TITLE TO THE PROPERTY a8QL LD OGEE WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DSPAR1M '4T 70 MGT APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY UNITS ON LAWBUIT'3 AGAINST FARMING DA FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30930. ORS 93.040(1) THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT SE W TTEN A PEW PROTECTION DLSTT1ICr PROTECTING SIIWCTURES. THE PROPERTY D staracr TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WHICH, IN FARM OR POR318T ZONES MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OP A RESIDENCE AND NIECE; MGT T LAWSUITS AGAINST PARMWQ OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEPINED IN OAS 30.93(1 IN AU.ZONES. =FOIE S1UNDJG OR ACCEPTINCI THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO IRE PROPERTY SHOULD ClIBC2 WITH THE • APPROPEIATB CITY OA COUNTY PLANNING DEPAATAIZ 4T TO VBRIFrY APPROVED USES AND EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION POR STRUCTURES. ORS 93.040(1) DATED: Sep(orubor 30. 1997. 10oth A.FlapttuEEOn QUA ..aoa�- Dula Raseatsaea • STATE OP OREGON ) )u. County at Marlon ) On tbls 30th dsy or Scptomber, 1997. Personally swans{ Were me the wkMc. nammd Kconoth A. Rurtwacn and Dario Itasnrram awl acknowledged add Wausau*to to Oalr lroir voluntary ea and deed. Before me: l `� € , ...,E.,, NOTARY PV1C -.'. :.ON My Gbntnliarloe • . 5.2-6-"It _ NOtAfiI PU$LIC•Ol1EOON �., CQuyit;EION NO-0374.15$ W 0366$30311 WOES S I II.SW 1Mtr«rra7MNy■. Mt I . • • 41/.09/99 TUE 11:41 FAX 503589 s7 [J 010 tray 0R 3840-- 11 I, CawgdIX.I. $_1 J I.awry a Fin0004 dar of kaiser R • rlterion Ind and moorks4 h cook a d..m cowOr ' . aw.car�cwrk �' Dec• 1 9E037094.1 facts 208129 48.00 . • 05/05/2998 04120255pa • i. . • t i • . .p I • ■ • • . / 3 . . • • F I ' • • I I t '1 1 '0 9/99 TUE 11:41 FAX 503589 17 a011 : -- 5 ,5 • cg gloqloC,y Attar recording. to: until ■ clause is rugatt rd. dl tar 0- ....' 4 at tameots shall Die tart too the following : L Claiato= - P..O ntt 749 NQ owls; ASALGIENICImmaximitia I/SALE QM MDR CONSIDERATION of the tam of no doling shies the Furman of Wit Aasigimena is In uatdbr Asiga Isom to the Mildred L Raanumen Rcbla Using i Tr' at dated December 10, 1997. • ' AssnONOSt: Dataskt D. Rasmussen and Mildred L Ruamsaaa, husband and wife ` do hereby amigo, under and eel over to ASStt3NER Mildred L moo. TYnnen of the MiWaed I_Rasmussen Reveal*Living • Trust dated December]Q 1997. . rt MI of Aaaig or's right, ass and inmost is and to that oetraiu Real Estate ` Caauract dried May 23.1984 Wawa 1 SELLER: M. E. Nowbrty and Ruth L Nea'btay, and BUYER: Kumah L Ras nustas, Darla Raman; Donald D. Rasmussen and Mildred L a Memorandum of which Cornrow Was recorded on 15 1984 1 Chug=deed r xedg under mwrd tefetmpe 84�. to the Washington Corny, t Assignor butter coevals the following ear yeaparty lacaseQ in wae>slaaQtos County, Orciron described in the above Real Estate Caearact tog : • Los 2. Block D, LEBMANN ACRE 1 ACI, %Mogan Cooney. Oregon.EXCEPTINQ THEREFROMd the Eau d4 ket thereat conveyed 4'MY/011 S rorhaay, et or, by deed tecared May 15. 1969 In Eaot 743,page dD. Remade of Washington County,Omgt . Assignor mamas shat Assignor lase the risla to transfer the one, t,4' r - Andar+aant of Contract rod Bargain oat gala Deedt tdldrad 1<se.uaeen itlae /fu0>tlu� arm . — r , r it I. .� I r ` il'it09/99 TEE 11:42 FAX 50 589 7 012 • 1 • f• r4 -..• The Fovblotu of the Canaan am iaoorporatod brain by tea, • a THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN i • - — INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD OIECIc WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEFAATU[IIIVT TO VERIFY APPROVE) USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY UMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. ORS 93,010(1) THE PROPERTY DESK IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY IS SUPIECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WINCH,IN FARM OR PORZisr ZONES MAY NOT AUTHORIZE C ONSIRL 'I1ON OR SITING OP A RESIDENCE AND WHIGS ' • LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS . 30.930 IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING TES INSTRUMENT.THE PERSON ACQUIRING FBE 17T LE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CEEB=WITH TI APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AM)EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES.ORS 93.0104) DATED: December 10. 1997. L3grieiv.12.4.4.0_,,, Dcaald D_SLIKIIIMIel ile/Ad4;a111 —.--, • • • l QkedL• • ' STATE OF OREGON J County of Marion )ac • On this 10th day of Docemhar. 1997,ponionally appeared tease me the within- + ntraed Donald D. Rao:mama Gad)4ildnid L. Rasolusain and aclopowled4od gld Waluaact to • be their their voialtaty act and deed. • NOTARY ',+-i. .aCFOR a•' ;r 6 My Cuareession Expires: --.0%-os .A euun:r.,r.:•rar.ic i F / N OINIYrttCcif..01:'1^- 3 Page 2 — Laiiane of Contract and DagaLo and Bala pr.4; XUAtiol Ilanaaaw Taws ' I f •- • . I r i .�•• PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES -A CITY OFTICARD POE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES MT Or ` !'* Community Dew/opment (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(6)Months) Shaping A(Better Community RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 2. t STAFF AT PRE-APP.: r Cj R , APPLICANT: V(z \ AGENT: Phone:I 1 Cc53) 7t{-ct_ C(ttiel Phone: I l PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: - 15 sW ce94-L . TAX MAPISI/LOT#151: `S1, 2--(=- C--- -1--- 3 NECESSARY APPLICATIONISI: SiTa "bit/ 'r- 02.E4/teas/ . Q( - Pcii, 4,k1v01 Y PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A sc�- v v4 f3o -'�N.>� !� c_1tvR r5 — :. D –T-n —t .t.! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: }4 'Zj�01\ik 1 St ( P. T.CVkL , ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: Q-- VZ C.I.T.AREA FACILITATOR: PHONE: 031 3,cSo i f fee.uNai ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUiftE4911TS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average lot width: /ft. Maximum building height: /5)ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side ft. Rear 2- IC ft. Corner 14A ft. from street. MAXIMUM SI E COVERAGE: go % Minimum landscaped or r5atural vegetation area: Z@%. [Refer to Code Section 18. 5 l I ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless I. -a ed through the Partition process. Lots created as part of a partition ust have a minimum o . eet of frontage or have a minimum -foot wide access easement. The DEPT a • •TS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 times the average wi th, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 0110 Residential Application/Planning DIvlslon Section - 6 e_-l1 r-i9w^ )-r" r F s po-'c-a'• ?z" SPECIAL SETBACKS • Streets: -- • -- _ -uterline of lag lot: A ten (10 :. side yard setback applies to all p -- • •ero lot li - • s: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each d ►- g unit or garage. P. Multi-family residential building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. [Refer to Code Section 18.730) ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. [See applicable zoning district for the primary structures'setback requirements.] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND US e■ e ON with the City of Tigard, applicant are REQUIRED to complete .•: e a subdivision plat na '-- request with the Washington . .unty Surveyor's •• - in order to obtain approval/reservation for y subdivision name. Applications ' no •e accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) FLAG LOT BUILD! G HEIGHT PROVISIONS MAXIM HEIGHT OF 1'/2 STORI - eet, whichever is less in most zones; 21/2 stories, or 35 feet in R- , - - zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.730.010.C.2. are satisfied. *.RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION [See example below) The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: All sensitive lands areas including: Land within the 100 year floodplain; Slopes exceeding 25%; Drainageways; and • Wetlands for the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-way dedication: • Single-family allocate 20% of gross acres for public facilities; or • Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities; or If available, the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) I EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE(3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq.ft. of gross site area 8,712 sq. ft. (20%)for public right-of-way 6,534 sq. ft. (15%)for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3,050 (minimum lot area) - 3.050 (minimum lot area) = 11.4 Units Per Acre = 12.1 Units Per Acre *The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for the next whole dwelling unit NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. *Minimum Project Density is 80%of the maximum allowed density.TO DETERMINE THIS STANDARD, MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS BY.8. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section BLOCKS The perimeter if BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,800 FEET measured along the rig. -of-way line except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bo. es of water or, pre-existing develo. R-a . When bloc engths great- •. .10 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways s .II be provided through the bloc . [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0901 FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS A FUTURE STRE T PLAN shall: Be filed the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan sh II show the pattern of existing and proposed future st -- from the boundaries of the propo:ed land division and shall include bou . _ ' o the proposed a division and shall inclu►,e other parcels within 200 feet s :ending and adjacent to the propose nd division. • Ide ify existing or propos-. . s routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle outes and ped-.trian facilities .• •r within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.FJ PARKING AND ACCESS ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. Single-family Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. Multiple-family Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms; and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 40% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches X 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. [Refer to Code Section 18.105 a 18.765) P ICYCLE RACKS BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. [Refer to Code Section 183651 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 10 Residential Application/Planning DIvlslon Section &Iqk J4°"A S Lam\ ACCESS WAYS Minimum number of accesses: k Minimum access width: Maximum access width: � Minimum pavement width: vt I 2 REQUIRED WALKWAY LOCATION (9 a- . / Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. (Refer to Code Section 18.7051 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT AT ROAD/DRIVEWAY, ROAD/RAILROAD, AND ROAD/ROAD INTERSECTIONS. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1951 BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS ALONG CERTAIN SITE PERIMETERS. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) KOs[ lU' w(Mtt w/ 02 The REQUIRED BUFFER AND SCREENING STAND S that are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: S k .1(45 . 2 (7$l6) " along the north boundary. �%(A along the east boundary. 1. along the south boundary. ((A along the west boundary. STREET TREES 1 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two(2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.705,18.745 a 18.7651 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; • Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.1 MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and • The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN-LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Adjustment application may be filed for Director's review. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LAND The Cod: provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAIN A GEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25%, OR ON UNSTABLE GROU D. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application confer: ce based on available information. HOWEVER, the res•o• .•flit to •recisel identif sensiti e lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsi. . . • e applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indi = -: on plans submitted with the development a••lica on. Chapter 1 :. 5 also provide •ulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESID ' - i ELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Re .r to Code Chapter 18.7151 STEEP SLOPES When ST: EP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a fi . : .- , a geo e •. al report must be submitted hich addresses the approval sten.- : of the Tigard Community D- elopment Code Section 18. 75.080.0. The report sh- :- eased upon field exploration and investig. ion and shall include spec . recommend. or achieving the requirements of Sections 18.775.080.C.2. and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED `! ERAGE AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE[R a 0196-44 L A ND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a egetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: THE VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 FEET WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the , - • a portion o e . •dor. If approval is granted by the Agency • City to reduce th- ,.. of a portion of the vegetated cor .,or, then the surface water in this area shal •- - ed to an area of the vegetated corridor that iN minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as all wed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25% of the length of the vegetated corridor within the develo ent or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetate corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permit d which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, E EPT AS ALLOWED AS FOLLOWS: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 01 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • • A GIA/A EL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from he boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and WA ER QUALITY FACILITIES m. -- •ac into the vegetate. c idor a maximum of ten (10) feet ■'th the approval • - - Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS OR LOTS intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R 8 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES VERIAY DISTRICT THE WAT R RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Compreh:nsive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetland Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establish ng clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit develop ent in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage apacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish an wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resour.- areas. Safe H :rbor: THE ' OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL ' (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Di ion 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped a•d protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow o • ore than 1,000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by -- Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1,000 cubic feet per secon. cfs). • MAJOR STREAMS IN TIGARD INCLUDE FANNO CREEK, AS' CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CR EK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, ed Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: THIS AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO AJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED ETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). • The standard Tualatin River riparian setback is 75 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 10 ResIdenUal Application/Planning Division Section • Th- ajor streams riparian setback is 50 feet, unless modified in accordance with this chapt: r. Isola ed wetlands and minor streams (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; how•ver, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) star dards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [R fer to Code Section 18.797.0301 Riparian Setha Reductions The D 'ECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY AJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of struc res or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better prot: tion for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enh.ncement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eli.''flit for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. To b- ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the r .arian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This deter 'nation must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.050.0 that demons .tes all of the following: • Native p . a- -•- currently cover less than 80% of the on-si - '.arian corridor area; The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparl. • corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the ast five (5) years; • That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 r NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria. CODE CHAPTERS / 18.330 ✓ 18.390 18.520 /18.715 18.765 ✓ 18.795 18.350 18.420 18.530 ✓ 18.730 18.775 8.797 /18.360 18.430 /18.620 18.745 18.780 18.800 18.370 , _18.510 V 18.705 .18.755 18.790 IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 10 ResidentialAppilcatIon/Planning Division Section NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE 4 APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). .iclIECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: t() Pr'v i '/e a # knnc%'i f 7nrs r L_ 9c'2 .2. 2.$ (-) prv.id'.c Q«flf Kea". Or` trl-e2)eA ft) 3 fm—A- t.s/I // f.,,. M4 - f'44" /r.' Fr'*" f//^.c AVJ.cr'}W_ (*tort-en P17 *f bcli4be /7 1'an.. ' la c .vc�i2vsy (3) Ojt (1. le ! f H- w, )� �,f/v Q� 1( ref T!rIO}. 4.cl// (LI) 1 e!/q' �-I o «L F 1 ell r/k n„ �l h1.1-Z 6 t r e f'v( 1 L,, + G, F i ,+.c. Pi"1/4," 4104)711-1 C c ,-,v •I-- CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted b mail or dro• •ed off at the counter without Plannin• Division acce•tance ma be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" reduced scale site plan of the proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or Administrative Decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A ten (10) business day, public appe I period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard c.ez . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE, (unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: V`- tiv )cI CITY Of TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX (503)684-7297 E-MAIL j afHme)_@a d.tigard.or.us M t)f doWI'S TITLE 18[CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.ligard.or.us i s\cu rpl n\masters\revised\preapp-r.mst (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Updated: Jun.7,99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 10 of 10 Residential Application/Planning Division Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. (cli Staff: �11�11� �' _ Date: (� 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size,addressed with 1"x 4"labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information,each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): I:1# Vicinity Map Of Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map l2/ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ /Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan L' Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan CY/ Site Development Plan I3/ Architectural Drawings C / Landscape Plan C3' Sign Drawings 0/ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on t e type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES ,. COPIES OF Or ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS.ALL City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop,THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ • Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20150/1001200')and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map p t L13e CttGcAacke CTS Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries,dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines(2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with z 6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names,addresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2'intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose,location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines(50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks,open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures,and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting - ❑ . Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions(if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes>10%) ❑ • Location,width and names of streets,easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ • All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ • Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site - ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ _ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location,size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces,decks,shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 -Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location,size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • i:\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q Common Tigard,Oregon opmen.t Shaping Better Community 15) �� PUBLIC FACILITIES - - -(cc) The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( )___ to feet from centerline. ( )___ to _feet from centerline. ( )® to _ feet from centerline. ( )____ to —feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( z- street improvements will be necessary along 'J Cs A1_- Ssr. to include: feet of pavement "FE►-k c. c.I-6R.{,rr.ft ['concrete curb r9"--storm sewers and other underground utilities Er 5 -foot concrete sidewalk (Ystreet trees E- street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Pagel of 6 Engineering Department Section 4 ) stre■ nprovements will be necessary alc to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees I I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owners right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) (12( Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section are on the opposite .e of the street from the site. If the 3 in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW C1;de �. . Prior to cxc-vP -{ , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The Barest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) = inch line which is located 24-c- c r. . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to w �x-�C 1. ,� ) w►�. 5 777 PuEA� Water Supply: , •( 6-To DAPS The A,c W - Drsi. - Phone:(503) Z` 'ail provides public water service in the area of this si e. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: dlc)40t, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Cam- ill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. ONSMS 11,1ti,rCiet-A 15 l lgeD Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious , aces. The resolution contains a p lion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( fry, Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section • In addition, the pet. ,ee will be required to post a bor Ir similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. * NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Englneering Department Section GRADI 1G PLAN REQUIREMENTS FL ABDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: - 7/211q1 E amvNEERING DEP TMENT STAFF Phone: [503)639-4171 Fax: [503]684-7297 h.\patty\rnasters\preapp.eng (Master section preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section (0. . NOT='S: LANDSCAPING k LEGEND' LEGAL' PROJECT MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS PROPERTY LINE 9315 SM.CORAL STREET h EXIST'G TREES / tIGARD,OR 91123 h OWER KEN RAC-+°Q STREET GTR LINE TIS,RIW, SEC 26 k ADDRESS PA.BOX 110 NEW BLDG.LINE — — — — — — LOT 03100 O 4 AUMSVILLE,OR.91325 NEW 4' ARBROVITAE ,�,, MAP 15126DG 3100 \ \ P4 IONE • (503)149-4949 EXIST G.BLDG. LINE 'A o V, SITE ADDRESS 9315 S.W.CORAL ST. EXIST'G. SETBACK ' TIGARD,OR 91123 EXIST'G 12' ARBROV1TAE CONTOUR LINE Q 04 CONST.TYPE. v31'1 EASEMENTS Qi t LOT • 03100 0 MAP • IS 126 DC 3100 LOT SIZE 18,119 SQ.FT. I ill IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE— 11,115 SO.FT.(599c) W •LANDSCAPE 9,604 SQ.FT.(41%) �` PARKING SHOW 8 SPACES,(5 REQUIRED) ` O C I I k 1 m CsARAGE J/ 25' / . R - 12 L _II 4.... N � `� w N ‘4 176.10' _� �+ � � IT ,f,.,^�} M".'� r,.,; r+-�+ r•�. M++ r�^.^�}, N^+ M+,�, ,.,.,, ,.,, h.N i�h+`\ �v ka+ h.N ' I �' I° CC F r .M.) car) cc) cc) cc cc F cc cc r� cc cc) + cc ka+ 12' )( I ' TRASFI �— WEDGE SPRIJCE � �' / / ENCLOSURE < 3(d"m T -� (6'wx6'cl x6 \ r r 1 _"I ° 0 PROPOSED EXTRUDED I I i llcU ,TYP. 0 I z IPROPOSED WIT I Z 1-' PLUrr 1 900 S�.FT. � II � n PARIGMCs fi I (D U oEXISTIES 'I I I i 8 S ^ �UTILLTIES U (� HI PATIO' I I \Jfl_i ,pi—I cal - a L O I �_ F J - its :1 \ LANDSCAPE- I i t ``� V 10k1I I I I . \ . o —_ 0 n ►4 PATIO I I I I — w 1�— CEDAR I 1 I cis 15' PROPOSED WIT I I — — — i 36' - I Ct 900 SQ FT. I 42 I I LOCUST •Q I I 0 FER �WEW4LK TY1* drawn date ■ 0 4 I I ,; 'lie 36' 11 I 0 if E.S. 1n/99 I I - EXISTYs NOUSE I U ♦ I-1 7 — + 1 P T i I I IV -1 EXI V a IS' I —— I0'x10' I PROPOSED WIT I I B.WALNUT 11 I I LOCUST �_�_ I __ ' ^ r PATIO I i I `T 9 6Q FT. ( I i II I PEAR I� I EXIST1G ilk I PROPOSED WIT C FER I le R j �. I 1 I - - I n TER I - 20�� I 3�0' I 26.1' _3-�f.0'_ i 18.5 / L- — )` ` 1 of 1 f I J 1 - EXIST'G DRIVEWAY 10' I J L L — plan WILLOW ` ,�,, ;- _�,,_ �`' '�' �'�� �.. /1. A. ' I SITE vow` 116.10' r -----, LB.WALNUT 1 GARAGE 1 c t I /� I E R - 12 J1 91 TE PL Al �l NORTH S SCALE: 1' = 20' III 11/ Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) July 1999 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, July 27, 1999 8:00 8:30 9:00 Ken Rasmussen - 503-749-4949 SDR @ 9375 SW Coral 9:30 10:00 10:30 • 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 3:55PM Thursday,July 15, 1999 ®�` C i TY nl TI GAHED �: '. .,....:, ..:!, J,...,_:i : :. . . .... . . . :: . . . . �` GEOGRAPHIC INf OR NATION SYSTEM Ia VICINITY MAP _ 1S126DC-03700 ■ , -W. w ill a M I I I BORDERS r . ,.. . ... .. . ...: . : . 1.11Airi - -:: : --:::-": -, :' ' :: - - ... :::i::::.... -'1:ligna III ' ..: -: ':i'l 1 `LFinAv II!I[111k C I RAL ST ' . .. INN IIIII 1111111 ......... . .... .. , , ... ... .:..::: . . .:: , .. .. ...: , 1 frijuTisil 1116 . . .LOCUST n `� N -- • 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fist I 1 1 1w 339 feet i AF 1i AF ST G `a! 4 City of . ..., ;: Information on this rap Is Oaf gamin'teeateo aetyand■ a shwa d with 2n DaysbpmMnt SslYieas _ 13125i 2234 (503)noam,OR mz3 (50 839. 171 :I/elww MAY 30 '00 12:13PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS iP. 1i1 • - I ' :Saliss,A MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS.mg/ P.O.Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsvil2e,Or 97325 (503)749-4949 fax(503)749-4950 www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER TO: COMPANY: •.1 FAX C,541 (pgA. T FROM Yt�.L u51 • RE: Zoo -10003 _ - •cave JOB# ' W .. [=A Number of Pages: Fax Cover Letter+ — Pages Message: K. - _ .- • 5 h- tilt: • Dui * , E lk ' - - . . a... .- t :i l., 1.4 AND la e .1 a' (44-1 - • Li A. • BARD COPY TO FOLLOW Drum MAIM, ❑ YES No If you do not receive all pages,please call as soon as possible at (503)7 -4949. Oarfax pumk is 150317 ■.�� CITY of TIGARD _ s� V , � GEOONAPNIC INPOR 4NTION SYSTEM ' s VICINITY MAP �r o 1ICIIESTS i T _1111 , �� SDR2000 00003 p _ VAR2000-00008 •► "RI! ►� RASMUSSEN PApa ��I � � PROJECT [ ili 1 11111-1111111111 IIIIIII 11111111 11.1 Mal ■ BORDERS l ST 1/111111611111111111111 C7 LEHMANN SITE I ,, ST j ---0---,1 Ai Z rn N CORAL ST 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet I ,1 i 1 /1 / / I11 1"=381 Met LOCUST ST / City of Tigard /. • i I— —_- C — Information on this map is for general location only and CO should be veed v th the Development Services Division. ---70� rif 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 lY (503)639-4171 r----EP hltpl/www.ci tigmrd onus Community Development Plot date:Jun 1,2000;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR • is P.iV (1c 5L l " 1 L � L R.z whi c, Emig 0 I/ R12 1 r Il a R-4. 5 p iiP" i . 11111g111 Id I I . liripill Ili ..10112) IP Mat rt- , • I.' "' . : . ST Akii IlliR r - Adplil I 111V7 Ill if gal I II Community Development BORDERS R- 12 (.9 m - LEHMAN I - CORAL R-12 .� (RD) "'-_4CUST Community Development t -4 ( z c= rya, r & ,..-,, - , .,,,,,,, ,..' . Par i x M we = ,.-Jrw'ems. s ° ;.•.,:-"' *e , , ,„:. , ' ,, , . `z.'.:,,,":`rzs «we` rR��- ik .' t M , �� t .ea -n, � am. _ . s ,: w4' ;Iliac :. r /.. # g 'ate:� ' ;.....'.....f ,.i.i.„....,.... ,...,t,;!,..„.....,;:;,,u,. ..,.ii. . L ,-.... ....- .. . 1 4' .-. -7'''•° :''' ' ... '''''' '/ pli n 'D,r ,a )/ )1 Corm nity Development Page 1 of 1 The frontage is approximately 106 feet in length. Coral Street is a local street and all the main utilities are in there. I would estimate this one at about$200.00/LF, so figure approximately$21,000.00. Thanks. Brian D. Rager L e a 42i ZaV Development Review Engineer /C pf1 City of Tigard (503) 639-4171, ext. 318 004.3 e-mail: brianr@ci.tigard.or.us f� / Q: file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00001.HTM 7/26/00 JUL 19 '00 11.29AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P. 1/2 Dom: 1 Vi 174° MODE N B� G 9X TEMS 1NC. P.O. Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville,Or 97325 (503)749.4949 fax(503)749-4950 www.mbs•-utodalar.com FAX C O VER LETTER TO: COMPANY: C[P t be _ 1CAn3 FAX 503 -• Z- 7 FROM: 6A RE: SMUSSil 1L Zt ti — 3 IM.Zouo-Do De JOB # Number of Pages: Fax Graver Letter+ Pages bys •• k 1 \$ s 'q 9 o4Sce r ask. Sl,ArtZ- A ' (o\L - is 'N11 IL •. HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN TEE MAIL 0 Yrs P ;NO If you do not receive all pages,please call as soon as possible at (503)749 449. O r nnm 503 9.4930 NI ....vneoe r...say.S-, AIrle tLLE,OR 91379 (V MOM• 1503)119-4949 017E ADDRESS 9319 NU CORAL 8T. TIGARD.CR-9-1r23 .g� 3 8 co►is�rime. -v H KASTIGTS,—) MB ♦PIPE LOT• 00100---- -- - -- - t - • 94, ' OW• a m4 DC voce _ - - LOT eIS 1e,,m O .Rr. DR,AIN - ZaNA R.a RPOMOUOCOVILRAGB— VIP 4aIR.r4es/ �Sq LANDSCAPE 1604 SO rt.rim) - IMO a (6 b4 S61 Fr k7 PARK9ia bolo N - 4 spaces,/4 REWIRED) HET IRESIDE1i7IAL WIT PITCH INLET Ig', .52 5EE DETAIL 25 SLOPE +-IO eIZ To = 3Z(B\t ‘0)5(-\t CL lase �' ``� I VERT. —— — (' V 1 � .. WATER Q6lALlTY SWALE -.., ‘. 1. .........1 . . . \� • �' •' ' (` 11.944 PIPE 4'MINUS j ', l T`y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . .� g GRA66 + �y 9g�pII�I 5r .9. RIVER S ____) U7 t es / \"� PLA6TIC CS.. . . . Y..�Y_{•vn•ti . IN•Qh°, •'1 ietlt:6#'�i rkF.,:ysNw 511: ..,w 4in•`'S,? �:t l SA∎ l.'T•CSC • . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • . •_ . + ��bt'y:..F� 3 ..`L. {(yam • Y a Y- MLET BORDER E h . . . . . , ^ � , EDGE OF PAVEMENT w, 1' \` i�f �.�` t y i tr M; J^r1 /et}}fI `"l �SY t 's '' Ka ` �:1;1�1c�'} `'`«i� E ( UJIDE STRIP CF 2'MINUS RIVER RUN I- z SLQPE } 2 14ORTL TO co I VERT. ca z al MI `7 DETAIL J�/51 ce �I-�EEr FLOW LA o NOT TO SCALE F 9 cr c°'V ExISTYs. GARAGE I z— R - 12 --S 0 0 m ti DITCI-I EXTEND C5F r7.6'+HIGH WOOD FENCE ir 4 RIP RAP Ima15-1• . — - - - - %�ti 116.10' Need- - k. - - - - 4. i ++ DROP'. _ - _SH6.PET AIL .9 •. 8'o 5 P. 1 101.15' I / AJSI 3m� LET Y---=1 i 49 "TRASH 9B.!' } ! ' • ENCLOSURE ( + I i2 v 07/19/00 13:54 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL 2001/003 Pride Disposal Co. Fa)C 4'" 1.,-R.4 .3,1� From ----- I-I Fax: Data: Phone: (j 39 - (`1 1 S Pages: 3 Re: Attn: ) PI h O O Urgent ❑For Review 0 Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑Please Recycle TELEPHONE(503)6254177 FAX 0 (SOS)621141179 -Comments: 41T-1•1 RE 07/19/00 13:54 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Ej 002/003 'JUL-16-2000 14:12 FROM-CIDA 1503226167. 7-415 P.001/002 F-265 4445 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 • PORTLAND. OREGON 97201 TEL: (503)226-1285 FAX:(503)226-1670 TOLL FREE;(888)226-1285 E-MAIL cida @tefeport.com FAX COVER LETTER PROJECT NO.: - °MD19 „•'' DATE: 7-i 9i-OO PROJECT NAME: Samr a OVte Ne1�.lwavie- TIME: ATTN: _ jean FAX#: (,2r,-(1741 COMPANY: fivio(2 Sp s..r 1,o. DESCRIPTION: 12 X 1 t .• QM A LA PA CW /1 1 310122000'COO w lA4 14)1 , t.. lt4 LOOK VV1AA _ frAY _ %& ifee,rtdi VW, y, FROM L .IAKJ 1;I __ X- FAX#: (503) 226-1670 PAGE 1 OF 2 (INCLUDING COVER LETTER) COMMENTS: T we e d vwi-e fie 5i Clam\ C t `0 ) itnott veur,3= \. 941144 . GU I,- c. tnze.litnn 141:14.6 (rk.61ai? of lord l � � �4 e r , i A Gt•Vr CVa Iaw I/1Pir f radiA (44)(la--c ivy pft Stwvc Kot Cu reeti fi itin �► D'JS aSoI I , ” T i ,c �J - tz lW ISMMC-e U- cc. ax. S a 0 ❑ ORIGINALS TO FOLLOW ❑ ORIGINALS NOT TO FOLLOW CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The inrornfjtion contained M Cn,s furs G cwlf1J.,rcivfa.iJ.i Nrtc•.Acd war foe.the.+Eo of rho%.cf;u440+ry Mr:ryfafla'd above. If the reader of This message Is not the intended recipient,,w if this transmission peas received in error,please notify us immediately at(S03)226-1283 e I; •FN(:INEI•RINc; • Nl.ANNINC; •• INTERIORS • LANDSCAPE f JUL-16-2000 14:12 FROM-CIDA 15032261670 1-415 P.002/002 F-265 • a . ,,. ' A .--- (n _ __ .°,,,.- - S C ,.... s.w . , AVE. C asiiniammiere4p,4 cA i. lo O o o�I i C --1— r ', �I i r e L ri o a r.ar am- I -- Iee �-); "°0 I! LI L 4 I f 1 t- pi �,- r i I b s Comet imsf . (ii. O v t DIM I i 1 t/1 i'. 1 ®®®O® ®000®©®oo®000000000 'i i ii ow;ia511r" a3 iasis 3aa � � 6 ! igoae. � IP 1 { $ iii ? i " Iigll1 ! 1 l _ 1gtlii-i SR ! � sae �g d E II I I 1 • 1 1;'I ;1:1 /a�f� i•kli SOURCE ONE NETWORK I I I I d v -oiv I. TIGARO. OREGON C00/C0021 1VSOdSIQ RQI2Id 6LT9 9Z9 COS. , SS:CT 00/6T/L0 JUL 20 '00 07. 19AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P. 1/1 Zo Date: toov doh gOD g TEMNG SY TEMS.INC. P.O.Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Annts vide,Or 97325 (503)749-4949 fax(503)749-4950 www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER TO: YIP ;°)( COMPANY: A lr • AAA FAX s4 - FROM: Mµ55 - RE: •S S 10 • S:L •-cu)03 UM_t -pooch JOB# Number of Pages: Fax Cover Letter+_ Pages 'Message: AIL A - , e, • L. I. L .. Pilo PEON -1U 11�_•_ e` °Ml1- LtALW g 'tZ-IZ—ptS 5004 AS S ,,- _ ? t . • Stets Aek 4 .w ,. - MS h CLt b1• JS►_l. bars Pte ( l.- F u ' Suxk.As po E I ►..► . ‘ul i PlATIE LS 6 . • zoo se Pr Arlo `3d APAI+4-.. I (.Mrbd y� �1 C0P15 b C-lt-vseilot1S C1.uL Aga AT r k F r CoulJrsti 'NO*/ HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL 0 YES I► NO `J,5 If you do not receive all palms,ply call as soon as possible at (503)74•-' 949. Oar ax nam 9.4950 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED JUL 2 0 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: 14.404,\I 4d>/ DEPT: 11„p. UL • FROM: �i�GEt2 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4-93l COMMENTS: - (z.) j, s 14' rg ri- Walter H. Knapp Silviculture&Forest Management Urban Forestry July 21, 2000 Ms. Karen Fox Planning Department City of Tigard Dear Ms. Fox: You've asked about the mature size of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) as it pertains to street trees adjacent to Coral Street on Ken Rasmussen's residential development. According to Dirr, the species would have an average height of 30-50 feet and an average width of 20-35 feet at maturity.' In my opinion, street trees in restricted rooting environments would be expected to mature at the lower end of the size range. Please let me know if you have further questions. Sincerely, Walter H. Knapp Certified Forester, SAF Certified Arborist, ISA PN-0497 Din,Michael A. 1998.Manual of woody landscape plants.Fifth edition. Stipes Publishing LLC, Champaign,IL. 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane,Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone/Fax:(503)646-4349 Aug 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p, l• Walter H.Knapp Silviculture 1 Forest Managenau 11A' / 'C1 4S9 Urban Forestry 7615 SW Dunsmuir line Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone/Far:501646-4349 ("":31k— To: Ken Rasmussen From: Walter l{Knapp Fax: 503-749-4950 Date: August 23,2000 `N.. Phone: Pages: 3 Re: Conditions of Approval CC: Aug 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p. 2 Walter H. Knapp Silviculture& Forest Management Urban Forestry August 23, 2000 To: Ken Rasmussen Subject: Conditions of Approval, Rasmussen Project, City of Tigard, Oregon Please refer the Conditions of Approval for the project. My responses are as follows: ¶13 & 14. Replacement Trees: Species Characteristics Armstrong maple(Acer x fremanii `Armstrong') Height: 50-60 ft. (45 ft. @ age 30) Width: 20-25 ft. (15 ft. @ age 30) Hardiness Zone: 4 to 8 (Willamette Valley= USDA Hardiness Zone 8 —mild) Reference: Street Tree Factsheets, 1993, by H.D. Gerhold,N.L.Lacasse, and W.N Wandell, Editors, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. ¶22. Tree Location, Sizes, and Fence Specifications. 1. Specification of tree locations and sizes is consistent between the existing condition plan and the revised tree inventory shown in the enclosed table: 2. Fence Specifications: To the extent feasible, fence posts will be placed a minimum of 5 feet from the trunk of any tree retained on the site. Postholes within the dripline of the tree will be hand dug, and minor adjustments to location will be made to avoid damage to tree roots larger than 3 inches in diameter. ¶23. Tree Tags and Fencing. The trees will be number tagged prior to construction. As specified in the Tree Protection and Removal Plan, I will verify the location and installation of the orange tree construction fencing prior to construction. ///, / / Walter ' . Kna•)1, Certified Forester, •F CertifiedArborist,ISA (W.lgf' •)peL •A1le\ 3.. `i co,p ;R — (te • frees Rug 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p. 3 Page2of2 Rasmussen Project Auger 23,2000 Walter IL Knapp Table 1 (Revised August 23,2000). Tree inventory for the Rasmussen Project Tree Species DBH Comments Rx-v No. _ Common Name Scientific Name [in] 1 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 36 fair condition retain 2 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 18 fair condition retain L 3 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 heart rot remove 4 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 fair condition retain 5 English walnut Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain T 6 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36 good condition retain 7 Douglas-fir l'seudotsuga menziesii 42 good condition retain 8 plum Prunus spp. 8 good condition retain I 9 spruce Picea spp. 26 good condition retain [north of site] 10 English walnut Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain ' Total number of trees: I 10 Trees la rger than 12 inches in diameter: Total number: 7p Dead, Dying, Diseased, Dangerous 1 Other trees>12 inches in diameter: 8 -Retained: 100% 8 q 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane,Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone/Far:(503)646-4349 Rug. 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p. 1 Wa • lker H.Knapp / C� Silviculture do Facet Management -710 I q's9 Uroaa Forestry 7615 SW Dunsmuir Lane Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone/Fax:503446-4349 (21,- To: Ken Rasmussen From: Waal!.APP Fax: 503-749-4950 Date: August 23,2000 Phone: Pages: 3 Re: Conditions of Approval CC: ' Flue 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p. 2 Walter IL Knapp Silviculture& Form Management Urban Forestry August 23, 2000 To: Ken Rasmussen Subject: Conditions of Approval, Rasmussen Project, City of Tigard, Oregon Please refer the Conditions of Approval for the project. My responses are as follows: ¶13 & 14. Replacement Trees: Species Characteristics Armstrong maple(Acer x fremanii `Armstrong') Height: 50-60 ft. (45 ft. @ age 30) Width: 20-25 ft. (15 ft. @ age 30) Hardiness Zone: 4 to 8 (Willamette Valley = USDA Hardiness Zone 8 —mild) Reference: Street Tree Factsheets, 1993, by H.D. Gerhold,N.L.Lacasse, and W.N Wandell, Editors, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA ¶22. Tree Location, Sizes, and Fence Specifications. 1. Specification of tree locations and sizes is consistent between the existing condition plan and the revised tree inventory shown in the enclosed table: 2. Fence Specifications: To the extent feasible, fence posts will be placed a minimum of 5 feet from the trunk of any tree retained on the site. Postholes within the dripline of the tree will be hand dug, and minor adjustments to location will be made to avoid damage to tree roots larger than 3 inches in diameter. ¶23. Tree Tags and Fencing. The trees will be number tagged prior to construction. As specified in the Tree Protection and Removal Plan, I will verify the location and installation of the orange tree construction fencing prior to construction. ///// Walter ' . Kna 9% Certified Forester, •F Certified Arborist,ISA . Rug 23 00 04: 46p Walter H. Knapp 503-646-4349 p, 3 Page 2 of 2 Rasmussen Project August 23,2000 Walter II. Knapp Table 1 (Revised August 23, 2000). Tree inventory for the Rasmussen Project ` Tree Species DBH Comments Rx No. _ Common Name Scientific Name [in] I black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 36 fair condition retain 2 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 18 fair condition retain 3 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 heart rot remove 4 black walnut Juglans nigra 20 fair condition retain • I. 5 English walnut ^Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain F 6 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36 good condition retain I • 7 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 42 good condition retain 8 plum Prunus spp. 8 good condition retain 9 spruce Picea spp. 26 good condition retain ' [north of site] 10 English walnut Juglans regia 12 fair condition retain i Total number of trees: I 1 0:' Trees larger than 12 inches in diameter: Total number: 7 Dead, Dying, Diseased, Dangerous 1 Other trees>12 inches in diameter: 8 Retained: 100% 8 7615 SW Dunsmair Lane,Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone/Fax:(503) 646-4349 AUG 30 '00 02:13PM MILLER'S P.2 MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE 'P.O.Box 217 Bcavcrcon,OR 97075-0217 Phone: 503.644-6161 lax: 503-643-3462 A SERVICE OF WASTE MANAGEMENT E-Mail: MilicrsSanit tionewm.coln F A X T R A N S M I S S I O N DATE : l;idfhbLS3C--/—xle2f:1C)- TO : h 5 FAX NUMBER : (503) 't .gi-`4� & la 1eci itte U 55,41 FROM: magg.. 14 I L(.J 50 ,tI • FAX NUMBER: 643-•3462 • IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . AT (503) 644--6161. MESSAGE,: /iI • / AA L. �w�l i 4 _4♦ , ... I lel OP F OF PAGES : (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) L -- - RUG 30 '00 02: 13PM MILLER'S P. 1 Date : _AgiUral.._ LSO} oa . Dear, Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed development at _-- —_:!J-��-•. -..�L� �'7�------- ---- and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : //1 �, I.' I�MOL I ' 4(012 l/ 0 � X Z =I/ !- I 0 • 11 ----...__---- i L . I. / /l "i S '/ i Y• A da r ga, 1dd _iti yr1 ._ • -too data able./5_aeglgr-L4r_. actiriO d icio pLp. Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . q7/16-41/1(- ClOadtht 842.440i674a e iz • AUG 30 '00 02:13PM MILLER'S P.2 p MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE P.O. Box 217 O` ' fk'' Bcavcnon,OR 97075-0217 Phone: 503-644-6161 Fax: 503-643-3462 A SERVICE OF WASTE MANAGEMENT E-Mail: MillcrsSanirarinn@ vm.co m F A X T R A N S M I S S I O N DATE : 3O, __Q_ TO : ALW,k r S FAX NUMBER : (503) 9-4.0 byi,„ vn.u5s FROM: M M ( - J 5O A) FAX NUMBER: 643-•3462 IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . AT (503) 644-6161. MESSAGE: ; QJvVL_ I,2. / • r dot:, S • I OF PAGES : (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) AUG 30 '00 02: 13PM MILLER'S P.1 Date : d OO_Au Dear. Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed development at _---_q ---� S �—_� ---- and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : 1 l/2. I ' X303Z I e e i to i / Ai `D -,4 7 'xZe LZiSLd at - 'in/7 'd9 -.# / L--60 a. o - - Oide .6(44_2AAL a�Pb kia p - Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . 4/76(111L Cilaba6&) 4,1:42.) 4d 4q2 u • MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. - f, IM Q, CCB #4637 A g O3 LuQH @ P.O. Box 110 9493 Porter Road AUMSVILLE, OR 97325 DATE JOB NO. crizol too-0 (503) 749-4949 FAX (503) 749-4950 ATTENTION www.mbs-modular.com S4rcAtA I J C.QSPb1- TO RE: �E G aco-000c3jUA,t 7,;e-c.: - tiaeob N ZS SW, 1,1Attk- D. % T woi,)ti I-774.3 WE ARE SENDING YOU ached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: > ❑ Shop drawing ❑ Prints ❑ Plans LI Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Zto wt,, LL Z e I o 2 . t S 'M tASeA 47tAURE tool Z e 3 A�'> ,r 2 9 z t zc 44 ��I 5i L DfU/ IoW 4zo S Oa-51 it UAT h,VAtm-t - &lug tD 41,6r0 R. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: or approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints > ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE __.. 11 R� PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS r�� 4 ' ILA. ci`t 4�-a`"�hl30 ,' {t L 1 M �o& if+FI AAJAA-' 'I-rnt r- `t1 15 x..∎ U me,'o A- v, EuE-Pt- t 1 1 . i t l , V .11k- Ot-,/ t O ( COPY TO SIGNED: ,,n,., If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify sat once. City of Tigard q I rpo o 7/3 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Karen Fox/ Sherman Casper Re: SPR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-00008 Rasmussen Project Conditions of Approval information submitted 8/31/2000 Telephone conversation with Karen Fox 9/8/2000. The following is additional drawing information or response per a telephone conversation with Karen Fox on Friday September 8th. ITEM RESPONSE 12, 15, 20, 21, 24, 26, & 28 These items are approved - per a telephone conversation with Karen. 9 See (SHT S/1)you will find (5) 60 wt sidewalk lights placed around the sidewalk adjacent to the parking and driveway areas. This meets police staff comment item#2 pg. 38. 10 See (SHT S/1) and you will find a 25' and 45'turning radius noted in the driveway area along with a 24'wide driveway with a 30' apron. Criteria met. 11 See (SHT S/1) and notice the drop box doors orientated towards the driveway. If this is a problem I will rotate the doors to face North. The garbage company would access the residential garbage cans through the 8' van access area. I really do not want to give up a parking space for garbage. A loss of a parking space would be a bigger inconvenience than the location of the garbage area. 13 A 2" diameter Acer Rubrum Armstrong would be planted if this is acceptable to the city. See (SHT S/1). 14 See (SHT S/2) Acer Rubrum is 15'to 25' apart. Also refer to aborist Walt Knapp's letter dated 8/23. The landscape plan scale is 1" = 10'. The Shore Pine is approximately 25' apart;the Birch Penoula is approximately 15' apart and with the existing trees the spacing is satisfactory. 16 I will install a 6' Cedar wood fence along and just inside the property line. See (SHT S/2) for the additional vegetation noted in the buffer zone. 17 See (SHT S/2) for the noted vegetation in the 8'buffer zone on the west, north and east sides. Just inside the 6' Cedar fence will be a continuous hedge of Arborvitae. With the fence a hedge is not required; however, with this shrubbery there is approximately 40 plants per 1000 sq. ft. Which is twice the requirement. 18 On(SHT S/2)note the (3) flowering Plum trees 36' plus in bordering the driveway. The trees will provide the canopy effect, also (2)of these trees qualify as parking lot trees. Along both sides of the driveway is continuous Red Leaf Barberry to provide vertical shrubbery that will sufficiently screen the parking lot. ),( 1k 19 The selected method is franchised hauler review and sign off. Mark vAl Hillson has reviewed the site plan and has found that the size and location 1110 � of the drop box is o.k. Furthermore some garbage separation can occur lolvl with the red bins and yard debris bin, which makes it convenient for the tenant and compatible for the use and surrounding area. U 46k9 22 The existing trees are numbered on the landscape plan (S/2)to match the ` ` Ott, arborist's Table (1) dated 8/23. Also see the arborist's letter dated 8/23 Cr l Uu gi concerning fence postholes. See the arborists letter dated 8/23. Mr. Knapp will be present to show me �Lc( ���c,11Y'--�, the location of the orange construction fence and a field memorandum will � � � 4ti ��� (i►"i follow. �`tl�tl vd`°4U. 25 The plans have been turned into the building department which show the 25' and 45' radius. The buildings are small and (1) story with approximately 3462 sq. ft. of construction. With a driveway access less than 89' in length, a fire hydrant should not be required. 27 See (SHT S/2)There is approximately 1219 sq. ft. now without the hard surface which is greater than 1100 sq. ft. required if the existing house did have(3) or more bedrooms. Criteria met. 29 See Item 9 Criteria met. 30 Criteria met. I still disagree that handicap parking is required. The triplex and single unit do not require accessibility, See exception(1) in 1106.1.10.2 of the 97 UBC. Sincerely, do "11 Kenneth A. Rasmussen P.E. f74+3,4D City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Karen Fox/ Sherman Casper Re: SPR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-00008 Rasmussen Project Conditions of Approval information submitted 8/31/2000 Telephone conversation with Karen Fox 9/8/2000. The following is additional drawing information or response per a telephone conversation with Karen Fox on Friday September 8th. ITEM RESPONSE 12, 15, 20, 21, 24, 26, & 28 These items are approved - per a telephone conversation with Karen. 9 See(SHT S/1)you will find (5) 60 wt sidewalk lights placed around the sidewalk adjacent to the parking and driveway areas. This meets police staff comment item#2 pg. 38. 10 See (SHT S/1) and you will find a 25' and 45' turning radius noted in the driveway area along with a 24'wide driveway with a 30' apron. Criteria met. 11 See(SHT S/1) and notice the drop box doors orientated towards the driveway. If this is a problem I will rotate the doors to face North. The garbage company would access the residential garbage cans through the 8' van access area. I really do not want to give up a parking space for garbage. A loss of a parking space would be a bigger inconvenience than the location of the garbage area. 13 A 2" diameter Acer Rubrum Armstrong would be planted if this is acceptable to the city. See (SHT S/1). 14 See (SHT S/2)Acer Rubrum is 15'to 25' apart. Also refer to aborist Walt Knapp's letter dated 8/23. The landscape plan scale is 1" = 10'. The Shore Pine is approximately 25' apart;the Birch Penoula is approximately 15' apart and with the existing trees the spacing is satisfactory. 16 I will install a 6' Cedar wood fence along and just inside the property line. See (SHT S/2)for the additional vegetation noted in the buffer zone. 17 See (SHT S/2)for the noted vegetation in the 8'buffer zone on the west, north and east sides. Just inside the 6' Cedar fence will be a continuous hedge of Arborvitae. With the fence a hedge is not required; however, with this shrubbery there is approximately 40 plants per 1000 sq. ft. Which is twice the requirement. 18 On (SHT S/2) note the (3) flowering Plum trees 36' plus in bordering the driveway. The trees will provide the canopy effect, also (2)of these trees qualify as parking lot trees. Along both sides of the driveway is continuous Red Leaf Barberry to provide vertical shrubbery that will sufficiently screen the parking lot. 19 The selected method is franchised hauler review and sign off. Mark Hillson has reviewed the site plan and has found that the size and location of the drop box is o.k. Furthermore some garbage separation can occur with the red bins and yard debris bin, which makes it convenient for the tenant and compatible for the use and surrounding area. 22 The existing trees are numbered on the landscape plan(S/2)to match the arborist's Table (1) dated 8/23. Also see the arborist's letter dated 8/23 concerning fence postholes. 23 See the arborists letter dated 8/23. Mr. Knapp will be present to show me the location of the orange construction fence and a field memorandum will follow. 25 The plans have been turned into the building department which show the 25' and 45' radius. The buildings are small and(1) story with approximately 3462 sq. ft. of construction. With a driveway access less than 89' in length, a fire hydrant should not be required. 27 See (SHT S/2)There is approximately 1219 sq. ft. now without the hard surface which is greater than 1100 sq. ft. required if the existing house did have(3) or more bedrooms. Criteria met. 29 See Item 9 Criteria met. 30 Criteria met. I still disagree that handicap parking is required. The triplex and single unit do not require accessibility, See exception(1) in 1106.1.10.2 of the 97 UBC. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Rasmussen P.E. - AUG 30 '00 02:13PM MILLER'S P.2 ,:,....:,,1 MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE I/ 'P.O. Box 217 'b ;'' 13cavcrcon,OR 97075-0217 Phone: 503-644-6161 Fax: 503-643-3462 A SERVICE OF WASTE MANAGEMENT E-Mail: MillcrsSaniracinn @wm.com F A X T R A N S M I S S I O N DATE : O/ agan TO : h S FAX NUMBER: (5)3) 114 `'Sb lada—kahfilL6Sati.,—. FROM: L 14 iti4..I SO Il) FAX NUMBER: 643-3462 IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL MILLER'S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . AT (503) 644-6161. MESSAGE.: I) 1 / A . L _' :.•y i,I ..l• . ... I ' ISIEVIIIIMIMI P I 6 OF PAGES : (INCLUDING COVER SHEET') AUG 30 '00 02: 13PM MILLER'S P. i Date : OJ EOQ . Dear Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments for the proposed development at and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions : I //2- ,atd e Y' i ' y L/ 4 diwiA dazdagAeis Zt d eic cp. Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC. 1/447/10.11... ‘101!&691...) 42,04144-39V P.OCT 02 '00 09 S?AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS • _Aph MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS INC. P.O. Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 7494949 Fax: (503) 749-4950 http://www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER DATE: p DO TO: :I r COMPANY: FAX: 9 tao FROM: MUSS RE: JOB # NUMBER OF PACES: FAX COVER LETTER + ( PACES MESSAGE; 1-10TE F P�bPCv!l �A2�uA� HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES❑ NO:!P If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as po-slble at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-4950. OCT 02 '00 09:37AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.2/2 FROM : ENDPOINT DESIGN PHONE NO. : 503+460+9317 Sep. 30 2000 01:14PM P2 % P741 i z ,ZI il i 1m.•■•••■■.0 MMIN•••OD■•■1110 vm MIIIIIM=IV••■••••••■■•■■••••••■• tn 2 S 2 , 11 --1 n -% . f, 1 0_ goo. emepa — 5. E0 i . Z V i a 1 ii u 26 .......z .4 ix 11 t:to 1 \ , . li ....._, d vn,a o. kc."d% . . _. - r 4°°9�� P�Ii • �4u w X . 'r I= *1 i J�1gIXM 1§V dP,El 01314 _ -11 Nn V3A1 Y. I O� of al�nod VT1 1- L ,® I 4 I m "Mi1 _ 8 xci rd /7" ,,,_ft. tit 10,.1.SIMI _ r i 4?3K 1 :7 I- ---A, tk, , 7. . , D_. I � ,. .u5= Wig dobd 1 12, ' s. I ...••■ in : i i \: ' - : 0 0 dr co 0 ji.N‘ I L :i1N—'"A%I Ne. :%.• 1J) I I 1.1. 4 1 i lo ri \ g\ \ 1 i.,,,.. .,ktg °.1 I `1‘ e_ i u. i --*: -- Ii" . , \ei\ at ibil � i'l c � I I h\ I I 1 e \ '■-• i • si®--6 le -®--- 4®,1 i�-,6 - 414.„,„at.1 A ik October 2, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Kenneth Rasmussen Modern Building Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 110 9493 Porter Road Aumsville, OR 97325 RE: Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Planning Division Review of Conditions Dear Mr. Rasmussen: I have reviewed your material recently re-submitted for a Review of Conditions by the Planning Division for issuance of a site permit related to your land-use decision. This letter is intended to provide you with a status report. All conditions #9-30 have been met except the following: #11 Relocate Trash enclosure The trash enclosure must be located outside of the 20 foot front yard setback in accordance with Section 18.755.050.B.7. Currently the trash enclosure appears to be about 2 feet into the front yard setback. I received your fax regarding using the handicap access to service the trash enclosure and this is not an acceptable solution. I would suggest moving the trash enclosure slightly to the north and west so that is out of the front yard setback and so that doors do not swing into the access drive. A minimum of four feet clear shall be maintained on the adjacent walkway, in any case. #16 Revised Landscape Plan/Fencing The perimeter fencing on the plans reads 6" and 4" in height respectively. Please change to read 6' (feet) and 4' (feet), except in the area of visual clearance where the fence shall be 3' (feet) in height so that it does not obstruct the view. #23 Trees Tagged/Construction Fencing This condition shall be satisfied when your arborist filed verifies that all trees protection is in place including tagging trees and placing orange construction fencing under the driplines of all trees. Regarding the fence postholes work in the area of the tree roots of trees belonging to your neighbors, I suggest you obtain a sign-off on the proposed work Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 from the owners of the property to ensure they are aware of the method you have proposed and do not object. The City cannot approve a specific method for handling the postholes into the neighboring property owner's trees without this kind of assurance. If you cannot obtain approval from the adjacent owner, I suggest you jog the fence around any vulnerable root areas. If you choose the latter method, please submit a revised plan showing your proposal for approval. #29 Lighting for Crime Prevention The Police Dept specifically recommended additional ground type lighting in the parking lot area. I suggest that you place two additional 60 watt ground-type lights around and near the handicap parking and the trash enclosure area for crime prevention and safety. I understand from Bob Poskin's of the Building Division that he has signed-off on your plans, and I am awaiting review of your plans by Brian Rager of the Engineering Department. As you move close to obtaining your permits, Sherman Casper, Permit Coordinator, is available to assist you with the process at 639-4171 ext. 322.. If you have any questions regarding review of your planning conditions, please contact me at. 315. Yours truly, Wren Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Land Use Casefile: #SDR2000-00003 Bob Poskin Brian Rager Dick Bewersdorff Sherman Casper I:curpin lkarenlsdrlsdr00-3cond.doc Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Page 2 of 2 1oi;roo . Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR200O-00003 10:28:54 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 1. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$120. 0001 HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 4. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street impovement along the frontage of SW Coral Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local commercial industrial street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pacement shall be built beyond the site frontage;C. concrete curb,or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage,including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements;G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; I. underground utilities;J. street signs(if applicable); K. driveway apron(if applicable);and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Coral Street in a safe manner,as approved by the Engineering Department. 0001 PROFILE OF SW CORAL ST 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 5. A profile of SW Coral Street shall be required,extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 0001 WORK IN PUBLIC ROW 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 6. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall show all work in the public right-of-way, including the sanitary sewer tap,water service tap(s)and storm drainage work. 0001 ON-SITE H2O QUALITY FACILITY 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No.00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brian Rager)for review and approval prior to issuance of the Building permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 0001 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 8. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans-Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 0001 WALKWAY LIGHTING 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 9. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. 0001 REDESIGN ACCESS 0 Met 10/20/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 10. The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24-foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. 0001 RELOCATE TRASH ENCLOSURES 0 Not Met KPF 8/9/00 ST 11. The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. e t ' �,o�� 0001 SCREENED TRASH ENCLOSURE 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF " 1` 12. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section fi 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18.755.050.C.3. Page 1 of 4 10/?I00 . Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2O0O-00003 10:30:09 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 13. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced,or add one(1)additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C,and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two(2)inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size,including tree height and branching width at maturity,and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. 0001 TREE SPACING IN BUFFER AREA 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 14. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan,and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area,and the branching width at maturity. 0001 BUFFER WIDTH 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 15. The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east,north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit#2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. 0001 REV.LANDSCAPE PLAN/FENCING 0 Not Met KPF 8/9/00 ST 16. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5,or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of Tax Lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. 0001 CONTINUOUS SCREENING 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 17. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. 0001 REV.LANDSCAPEPLAN/SHRUBBERY 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 18. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery(at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property(and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum,screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parking lot. In addition,the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees(minimum 2"caliper at DBH)on the landscape plan,equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. 0001 DISPOSAL 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 19. The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it has selected,and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. 0001 PARKING PLAN 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 20. The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G,Section 18.360.090.14,and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Building Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate the two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive,or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765,Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls, in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked;and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 0001 ENTRANCE LOCATION-UNIT#4 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 21. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings,the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4,and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. 0001 LOCATION/SIZE OF TREES 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 22. The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan,and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicant's arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. Page 2 of 4 10/2/00 . Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00003 10:28:54 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 TREES TGGED/CONSTRUCTION FENCING 0 Not Met KPF 8/17/00 ST 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly, and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. 0001 30-FOOT VISUAL CLEARANCE 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 24. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance to Chapter 18.795,and figure 18.795.1. 0001 FIRE ACCESS RADIUS 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 25. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius,and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 0001 REV.SITE/LANDSC.PLAN/SCREENING 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 26. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide screening in the form of a minimum five(5')foot high wooden fencing,and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition,the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun,for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. 0001 SHARE OUTDOOR RECREATION SPACE 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 27. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house,and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom,the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. 0001 PRIVATE OUTDOOR AREAS 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas,semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention,and to establish maintenance responsibility in acordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. 0001 LIGHTING FOR CRIME PREVENTION 0 Not Met KPF 8/9/00 ST 29. The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime prevention between Proposed Units#4 and#1,and in the parking lot at lighting levels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends"ground type lighting between Units#1 and#4,and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable(for the site)provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." 0001 ADA REQUIREMENTS 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. 0001 PROPOSED WATER CONNECTION 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 31. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection(s). 0001 REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 32. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements,obtain conditional acceptance from the City,and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 0001 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 33. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars,and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in"DWG"format,if available;otherwise"DXF"will be acceptable. NOTE: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn,then a diskette is not required. 0105 UTILITIES(EXISTNG)UNDERGRND/PAY 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 34. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it will be$2,915 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. Page 3 of 4 10/2/00 . - Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00003 10:28:54 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0104 USA REQUIREMENTS: 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 35. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 0001 MARK INTERIOR DRIVES 0 Not Met BP 8/9/00 ST 36. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall clearly mark and sign all interior drives and access aisles to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 0001 SIGN POSTED/ACCESSIBLE PARKING 0 Not Met BP 8/9/00 ST 37. Prior to final building inspection,a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space,shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible"parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked"Van Accessible"mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards,and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. Page 4 of 4 OCT 03 '00 05:25PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.1/2 Adig110,1111h■ _',MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS INC. P.O.Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749-4949 Fax: (503) 7494950 http: //www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER Date: 10147,00D To: 9-1'W1 1 CAW- OetkIA COMPANY: CA Fax Ma ( e'3 96 - l9 vD FROM: a i --RAcAki,556,1 RE: VA 5 rtl t41- (1-11b - w 11415 LocW-? NUMBER OF PAGES: FAX COVER LETTER + PAGES HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES ❑ NO ``p If you do not receive all Dagesc ed fax number Is�503} possible a9-4950at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated OCT 03 '00 05:25PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.2/2 - 1' •I' ir I,. t ,.... . 7 . j ___________ .. . ,, ;1o.1r 7 q 1 • •.• . . • \ 1 i . ...... _ 1 . t . .. .... [ • . : . _ . . . , • • . . _ —1- • /yZ///,//;-.,.•:Vt.// . .. ____. . __,--.: . • % 'f Ji � b � ./.- f /J/f/ Al f3l _ A. .. ; • { • Ii ' . • 1 1 • • • On/ / /`2/Cc,9'7i/_ 10/16/00 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00003 Cdcf 9:56:37 AM Yutic Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 1. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/S ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 1. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 3. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$120. 0001 HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 4. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street impovement along the frontage of SW Coral Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local commercial industrial street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pacement shall be built beyond the site frontage;C. concrete curb,or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage,including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; I. underground utilities;J. street signs(if applicable); K. driveway apron(if applicable);and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Coral Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 0001 PROFILE OF SW CORAL ST 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 5. A profile of SW Coral Street shall he required,extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 0001 WORK IN PUBLIC ROW 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 6. The applicant's public improvement construction plans shall show all work in the public right-of-way, including the sanitary sewer tap,water service tap(s)and storm drainage work. 0001 ON-SITE H2O QUALITY FACILITY 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 7. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No.00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Brian Rager)for review and approval prior to issuance of the Building permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 0001 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 8. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans-Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 0001 WALKWAY LIGHTING 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 9. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include walkway lighting per the approval of the Tigard Police Department. 0001 REDESIGN ACCESS 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 10. The applicant shall re-design the access in accordance with requirements of the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue to meet the minimum fire access radius. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan a minimum access width of 30 feet with a 24-foot minimum pavement width from curb to curb for the new access. 0001 RELOCATE TRASH ENCLOSURES 0 Met 10/16/00 KPF 10/16/00 KPF 11. The applicant shall revise the plans and relocate the trash enclosure outside of the buffer area. 0001 SCREENED TRASH ENCLOSURE 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 12. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate a screened trash enclosure in accordance with Section 18.745.050.E.4 and Section 18.755.050.C.3. Page 1 of 4 10/16/00 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00003 9:56:37 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 REVISE LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 13. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either indicate replacement of the Locust trees with new trees properly spaced,or add one(1)additional street tree. The location of any new street trees is to be determined by working with staff and obtaining approval for the location. Street trees shall be spaced to meet spacing standards in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C,and new trees shall have a minimum caliper of two(2)inches at four feet in height above grade. The applicant shall provide a reference from a standard landscape or gardening source to confirm the classification of the tree size,including tree height and branching width at maturity,and suitability for the Willamette Valley Climate. 0001 TREE SPACING IN BUFFER AREA 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 14. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan,and provide trees spaced evenly within the buffer area between 15 to 30 feet apart depending on the proposed tree species branching width at maturity. The applicant's arborist shall specify the exact tree species proposed in the buffer area,and the branching width at maturity. 0001 BUFFER WIDTH 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 15. The applicant shall provide a buffer width of eight feet on the east, north and west property lines. The concrete patio behind Proposed Unit#2 shall be moved or reduced in size or shape so that it does not encroach into the buffer area. 0001 REV.LANDSCAPE PLAN/FENCING 0 Met 10/16/00 KPF 10/16/00 KPF 16. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and either provide fencing and landscaping along the east property line to satisfy the requirement for screening in accordance with Section 18.745.050.B.5,or provide the following: a three (3)-party agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east which provides that the fencing and landscaping on the property to the east may be used to meet the screening requirement and that the property owner of Tax Lot 3700 shall maintain the screening. 0001 CONTINUOUS SCREENING 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 17. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan to indicate continuous screening along the entire east and west property lines in accordance with Section 18.745.050. It is recommended that screening be by means of a six-foot-high wooden fence to match the height of the existing fence on the property to the east. 0001 REV.LANDSCAPEPLAN/SHRUBBERY 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 18. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan adding low-lying and vertical shrubbery(at least four feet in height) sufficient to screen the parking lot from view from abutting property(and from property across Coral Street to the south). At a minimum,screening shall be placed along the entire east side and the north and northwest sides of the parking lot. In addition, the applicant shall indicate a minimum of two parking lot trees(minimum 2"caliper at DBH)on the landscape plan,equally distributed in order to provide a canopy effect. 0001 DISPOSAL 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 19. The applicant shall indicate which one of the four different methods of disposal it has selected,and show how it will meet the requirement of the selected method in accordance with Section 18.755.040. The applicant shall submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility regardless of the method chosen. 0001 PARKING PLAN 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 20. The applicant shall revise the parking plan to meet the minimum space dimensions in accordance with Section 18.765.040.N., Section 18.765.030.G,Section 18.360.090.14,and as specified in the State of Oregon the Uniform Building Code and federal standards for ADA requirements. The applicant shall eliminate the two parking spaces shown on the site plan that are blocking the required 24-foot access drive,or redesign the parking lot in some other manner which meets all of the provisions of Chapter 18.765,Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Wheel stops shall be located three feet back from the front of the parking stalls,in accordance with Section 18.765.040.J. The applicant shall indicate the type of material to be used to surface the access drive as either asphalt or concrete. Parking spaces shall be clearly marked;and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 0001 ENTRANCE LOCATION-UNIT#4 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 21. The applicant shall indicate on the site plan and elevations drawings,the location of the entrance for Proposed Unit #4,and shall locate the bicycle parking within 50 feet of the primary entrance of all of the proposed new units on the site in accordance with Section 18.765.050. Page 2 of 4 10/16/00 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00003 9:56:37 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 LOCATION/SIZE OF TREES 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 22. The applicant's arborist shall certify the location and sizes of trees on the existing condition plan,and number the trees on the plan consistently with the numbering on the tree inventory prepared by the arborist. The applicants arborist shall provide tree protection specifications/measures regarding the installation of the wooden fence on the site to ensure that it does not cause root damage to existing trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan and include all tree protection specifications included in the arborist's tree preservation plan. 0001 TREES TGGED/CONSTRUCTION FENCING 0 Not Met KPF 8/17/00 ST 23. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant's arborist shall field verify that all trees are tagged properly,and that temporary orange construction fencing is in place throughout construction on the site. Orange construction fencing shall be placed under the drip-line of all trees to be preserved prior to issuance of a site permit. 0001 30-FOOT VISUAL CLEARANCE 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 24. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plans and show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle in accordance to Chapter 18.795,and figure 18.795.1. 0001 FIRE ACCESS RADIUS 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 25. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant shall revise the plans and provide details on how they will comply with requirements for fire access radius,and shall obtain approval from the Building Division and Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 0001 REV.SITE/LANDSC.PLAN/SCREENING 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 26. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide screening in the form of a minimum five(5')foot high wooden fencing,and landscaping around all patios or individual backyards of each new dwelling unit. In addition,the applicant shall indicate on the plans a minimum 48 square foot screened private outdoor area preferably oriented toward the sun,for the existing house as it is now part of the multi-family complex. 0001 SHARE OUTDOOR RECREATION SPACE 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 27. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and provide shared outdoor recreation spaces on the site in accordance with the size of area and other requirements in Section 18.360.090.A.7. The applicant shall confirm in writing the number of bedrooms in the existing house,and calculate the size of the shared outdoor area based on the number of bedrooms in each of the five units on the site. If all units on the site are two bedroom,the total required shared outdoor recreation space shall be 1,000 square feet. 0001 PRIVATE OUTDOOR AREAS 0 Met 9/8/00 KPF 9/8/00 KPF 28. The applicant shall revise the site and landscape plan and clearly define private outdoor areas,semi-private areas, and public spaces to establish persons having the right to be in the space to provide for crime prevention,and to establish maintenance responsibility in acordance with Section 18.360.090.A.9. 0001 LIGHTING FOR CRIME PREVENTION 0 Not Met KPF 8/9/00 ST 29. The applicant shall revise the plan for lighting and provide lighting for crime prevention between Proposed Units#4 and#1,and in the parking lot at lighting levels recommended by the Tigard Police Department or approved by the Tigard Police Department subsequent to this decision as follows: The Tigard Police Department recommends"ground type lighting between Units#1 and#4,and some additional lighting for the proposed parking area. "Ground type lighting would be acceptable(for the site)provided at least 60 watt output be minimally maintained." 0001 ADA REQUIREMENTS 0 Met 10/2/00 KPF 10/2/00 KPF 30. The applicant shall revise the site plan and shall meet all ADA requirements. 0001 PROPOSED WATER CONNECTION 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 31. Prior to issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water connection(s). 0001 REQUIRED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 0 Not Met BR 8/17/00 ST 32. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements,obtain conditional acceptance from the City,and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 0001 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 33. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars,and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in"DWG"format,if available;otherwise"DXF"will be acceptable. NOTE: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn,then a diskette is not required. Page 3 of 4 10/16/00 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR200O-00003 9:56:37 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0105 UTILITIES(EXISTNG)UNDERGRND/PAY 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 34. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Coral Street underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it will be$2,915 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 0104 USA REQUIREMENTS: 0 Not Met BR 8/9/00 ST 35. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 0001 MARK INTERIOR DRIVES 0 Not Met BP 8/9/00 ST 36. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall clearly mark and sign all interior drives and access aisles to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. 0001 SIGN POSTED/ACCESSIBLE PARKING 0 Not Met BP 8/9/00 ST 37. Prior to final building inspection,a sign shall be posted for the accessible parking space. The aisle shall be located on the passenger side. The sign shall be clearly visible to a person parking in the space,shall be marked with the International Symbol of Access and shall indicate the spaces are reserved for persons with disabled parking permits. "Van Accessible"parking spaces shall have an additional sign marked"Van Accessible"mounted below the sign. The parking spaces shall be designed in compliance with ADA standards,and shall be maintained at all times to meet the standards established by the state building code. Page 4 of 4 . . . . . ..,56,j'A-''' •,-3-1.,:\il,-\11. !s----1.-'-',dill'r-q59 -, !7:/ .!! . , : t i y � .l..d . � 7 i. ! v i. c c . ,,,,.t . ",.:,-••.,.r - ' . ` 7 i .. - ' . •t- - 'at>,at 4'. .r- .+ ,4 f v r ay 0'S J., "'. "y .. t. i .. ' .'... . --,,,t4.y� i .0 i ` r.s 7Y"'K : kki?�-t's..V. ,: a j .......4." Ili -.k. {, g ii, ( T { r ^ ' '.y4 .`. :• Y.{i k ,:-••47 ' r i rcFr .y t i. o;),4_,•:.;,,,•:•-• s, a :„ •.r, r "`k 's,r, 1-. '4 r - s i ---, R$ o •, ..-- 6 tsJ .01i,t .,. f ,•_, S}@ k. �- Z 41 .1 x a tt. ∎ P S -a. '{ 1"t' T�f{t. n mil-.> -i i?. '{.r.1Y .... .",.1..• •++ 1 - •,: 'a e s 7 y b ..? � , g � , + '' .- ` ' ,Stiff Persia Commeating - (t f P ' ' b � - . ...' e-5--.4-,:- De artment.+ '-..- E k x•• :a:.: `` :Phone Number/Extension 1b• �I- � 51+.. •,�,�.�,••_, .Y. .n: .r <ya,� 4r y � ...,, <•„. -Mie” ij,e1,� ik.,.. 't.A 14r.b f J-n .J� •f:Y- "^S�r. :. a - ass' ..•,.a �s t5'.°_- .'' C`-; ,.� e '.� z�y-. �; �'+''�"-• `s Vr <.. a ..ate,.. 41 ''''':.4.,'"1,--'4,"t5",.s. -? fir}1 's yn T-;:c51� _ :&-.}i '�}�? q ..!,,',4„,„,,_'� �`, +3 v ,, �J' yf �y. 1 �... -Site Permit No , !.. 4s ' � .•rsG,w �. 5Fr . $ -,.•.•0:.:'';:s_,, m ,, ' f, k a •✓ i '•Land Use Case File NotsL• . (� > } ``Sll��� � � ,��- *S.� 'ti + rem X,ts,,�''A��'�„i-,r -�': r .. - t �b5 `�• F �^- pu :2v�?. o t � . .- • a 8: a C '• • . .,• -` 'b,a� 13 e• . ;0 t, , i r eviewe• 4 liF: ;- �^ - - ;.I pa en .. e, .o to +�`. ` ,,hr : ,: �. � ,� , ti"-R'- u+�+'..� 4iC, , < k� � 4 .Y� .�w.,.A> r!b4d< � r�. �.� . F 3.a... --._ .. !4:„...;-,--,-;:-..-:-,?:::: - ❑ PLANS ARE APPROVED. All land use conditions related to this department have been z +4 ,f . satisfactorily met. . X >; PLANS ARE GENERALLY CONSISTENT with the land use approval, HOWEVER, THERE' ARE STILL LAND USE CONDITIONS THAT MUST BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF.THE. =r ';::>.. SITE AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS, OR PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. = ',Ly$,:: Specifically, { euvla # 3 - cc (n c�fcc i�, Gum 1,,,,>',:' '. ..:::--2.',. Ls,- t9 lat./ CAI-cc.c. rkQc t vi ci �- Ct1'GC-v- -s G u.�f rJC�t ste t n� .r- bins' C S12&It ❑ PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT with the land use approval AND MUST BE REVISED.:='-. {; ..• f iSpecifcally, :, • ,,,, NOTE IF THE PERMIT APPLICANT HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO THE COMMENTS ABOVE;v1,- THEY MUST CONTACT THE STAFF PERSON SPECIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE • ' ` ., 'Tu.> hapatty\masters\sitepian.mst .` ,;F,:- MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. CCB #4637 1177ffUn CDI '�RAag@I IIIME P.O. Box 110 9493 Porter Road AUMSVILLE, OR 97325 - DATE JOB NO. t� (503) 749-4949 FAX (503) 749-4950 ATTENTION 7.640 www.mbs-modular.com ( I _ TO CA b 1 1�0 RE: N r,C>VW [ r Ike 7M o — ()to; ) WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications • ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION S \b\1\4 o Omk., Pins Slz oPtfto lout zo-� CS)C.Ae (5 ¢ (Z \ CoPla to NE4 . RECEIVED OW 12 2000 COMMUNITY DEVFLQPMENl THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval r your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR,B,BIDS DUE/� ❑ PRINTS�R1ErT`URNED AFTER LOAN TO US _'! REMARKS \k-I / t'�lIrPoM 7 r l & IU Gor1 c- St 0 1 , fi -o rt 4 1,46141,k, - COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify u at once. SDk. wo - 3 /1-- v RECEIVED PLANNING NOV 1 3 2000 CITY OF TIGARD „z„,:,S) w� c1/41 4D w � ate , , V o -nME, cIAG k— t4ovu CE (40A 1 rto C Cur Lo f /fit t'LL A2,4 s I�l • rfr !yl a LQO" fitr 4 C 8.0/��✓ gp,-7/00 . bbl d Oise..„ _y.4J r c-n 4cc2/12t�5 Gc ff of (UN. .uil/G►c-cep 71/4144...e.„ 7-A 10 • r 414' 7 ) US.POSTAGi MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, inc. , 11) _'.16,t. 0) %;.' 0 0 3 5 , • P.O.Box 110•9493 Porter Road•Aumsville,OR 97325 U.S.A. c-3 4s= POSTALIA102287 CttA, b 44 kl-11,VvitAba (> cxA Zbos 1D(1€ DEC 04 '00 07:58AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.1/2 rg MODERN BUILDING SYSTEIMS, INC. P.0_ Box 110 /9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 7494940 Fax: (503) 749-4950 http://www.mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER DATE: tZ f,4 I __6,,QQ TO: COMPANY: cl 0 voAaj FAX: �So3 ) 4- - 7 Zco FROM: ,'61,1 « LSS'61 NUMBER OF PAGES: 'AX COVER LETTER + 1 PAGES MESSAGE: V iM .) Ms. I4 S11.01-i'N 11-41$ i A-r._ _{L HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES Li NO im, If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as possible at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-4950. DEC 04 '00 07:58AM• BLDG SYSTEMS P.2/2 ' |' �, - �� ~~ ~ ,. /Iv•• __ ' ----_____''--_-_'--__-- �� -__-_ -_ ------'_--'_- ' _------__---____---_----- I | • ___ ___----'- ____ (...1.4.... CA.... -. • , ...,2 4,-41 01--K-.9-k- 'S L.A.& .......... . C tl CI-1.4. .....Rjr•.--, kc-_,),_t ..k:c .)-- ,i-e,a____ ___ __. .e_vr._ --- __4,7..s yvt.t.)1/4.s.s..Q_L-k ___ _. _i i b1/4.... ..x.,(A,R, -k-t,...e I • vi............ -yvk...„,_ • . , 1 i IL ........ . . . ___________ iii . 1. .il _ il ...... lc__ .. . :-Au...„....a& 1 ii 4 ------------- -'--'' -'- |'�-------- -- ---� - ___ `|\ � ^ � '' ----_� � / / -- -�, | � i . � /,�' -// � = ` �� •~ (�/ a, --/-1( -)/( 0f-'4'- ! | |i\ | -- -- •i ii � ! / �l _----_ �� 'k�/ . ir..\\._ _ | | _ ------- '------ ,V,.... \ ______-'__- - 4 . . .. .. . ` \ . ` • ! / ^ \ ' Friday, February 16, 2001 3:02 PM Walter H. Knapp 503-265-8117 p.01 s Walter H. Knapp Si!vicutture&Forest Management Urban Forestry February 16, 2001 Ms. Karen Fox City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ms. Fox: eli 2c'( On February 12, I visited the Rasmussen project at 9375 SW Coral in Tigard. I verified that the sizes, locations, and numbering of the trees are correct,and that protection f fencing has been installed. c* Please note that I reexamined tree number 5, an English walnut, and determined that it is se unstable. The root plate on the north side of the tree, adjacent to the existing house, is A:-)e o rising. This is resulting in a progressive lean, and the tree could fail at any time. This �� tree should be removed prior to construction. • �o C Please contact me if you have any questions regarding my findings. 0 Sincerely, Alf i s N0. ,fix i se's r,q h otrtA4 Walter H. Knapp U Certified Forester,SAF Certified Arbonst,ISA PN-0497 7615 SW Dwnsrnwtr Late,Beaverton,OR 97007 Phone:(503)646-4349;Far_(503)265-8117 February 26, 2001 Kenneth Rasmussen Modern Building Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 110 9493 Porter Road Aumsville, OR 97325 RE: Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003NAR 2000-00008 Planning Division Review of Conditions Dear Mr. Rasmussen: I have reviewed the material you recently re-submitted for a Review of Conditions by the Planning Division for issuance of a site permit related to your land-use decision. This letter is intended to provide you with an updated status report. Conditions #9-30 have been met except for the following. #11 Relocate Trash enclosure Unfortunately the sketch you submitted by fax on October 3, 2000 did not meet this condition. Should you place the trash enclosure with the north facing orientation, it won't leave enough room for the disposal truck to reach the enclosure and empty the trash. The original suggestion to shift the trash enclosure a little to the north and 4 feet to the west, is still the best way to meet the 20-foot front yard setback requirement found in section 18.755.050.B.7. This also keeps the enclosure doors from swinging into the access drive while allowing the disposal truck access to the trash. Once you have determined how you will meet this condition, it is necessary to have the revised plan for the trash enclosure examined and signed off by the local waster handler for that area. You can reach Miller Disposal Company at 503-644-6161 . #16 Revised Landscape Plan/Fencing The perimeter fencing on the plans reads 6" and 4" in height respectively. Please change to read 6' (feet) and 4' (feet), except in the area of visual clearance where the fence shall be 3' (feet) in height so that it does not obstruct the view. The 52" change in fence height along the Hanson property has been approved. It was requested via correspondence and fax on December 4th, 2000. Please adapt your plan to show this change. Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-00008 Page 1 of 2 #23 Trees Tagged/Construction Fencing We received a letter from your arborist, Walter H. Knapp, on February 16, 2001 verifying that all tree protection is in place. However, we are still waiting for the suggested sign-off by your neighbors regarding the proposed fence posthole work in the area of the tree roots of trees belonging to them. This sign-off was suggested in order to ensure that your neighbors are aware of the method you have proposed and do not object. The City cannot approve a specific method for handling the postholes into the neighboring property owner's trees without this kind of assurance. If you cannot obtain approval from the adjacent owner, I suggest you jog the fence around any vulnerable root areas. If you choose the latter method, please submit a revised plan showing your proposal for approval. #29 Lighting for Crime Prevention The Police Dept specifically recommended additional ground type lighting in the parking lot area. I suggest that you place two additional 60-watt ground-type lights around and near the handicap parking and the trash enclosure area for crime prevention and safety. Bob Poskin's of the Building Division has signed-off on your plans, but Brian Rager of the Engineering Department is still in the process of reviewing your plans. As you move closer to obtaining your permits, Sherman Casper, Permit Coordinator, is available to assist you with the process at 639-4171 ext. 322. If you have any questions regarding review of your planning conditions, please contact me at (503) 639-4171 ext. 407. Yours truly, Kevin Young Associate Planner cc: Land Use Case File: #SDR2000-00003 Bob Poskin Brian Rager Dick Bewersdorff Sherman Casper Rasmussen Project SDR 2000-00003/VAR 2000-00008 Page 2 of 2 7 FEB 28 '01 07:3BPM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.3/5 I p,■ ....--- Ms MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. P.O.Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749.4949 F3X; (503)749950 http: /IwWW_mbs-modular.com FAX COVER LETTER Date: I b)4 120„ TO: c } ,A,J CAS KA_ COMPANY: colt bc_ n(ki Fax No: 596 - 19 t.0 • •• •■.. t 6Ku5561 f - ; 7 NUMBER OF PAGES: FAX COVER LETTER + 1 PACES HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL Yes ❑ NO F If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as possible at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number Is (503) 749-4950. .10 to '�- i 1,,co D LE (.4 aLA-A-. iritil 28 '01 07:SBP'M MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS_.I l I F.7 7 I-1''.-1-1-1-117-11-. - _ _ _■«may I I , I • , . -_I- -,- - 1.1 ..-1-I �f�_ .�. '_� • ■ 5 `7 ZZ' -C y ' if t. ', .- • Parae 3 c�a3 . ;.. . • • • n 1-,— , - ---- - -�- • 1. ! J .... '! iI i I I s J _ : . . _ • , 9 •. .. Ir. . . .. • . , ,...i.__....._.., _i • , • , . . _. .. . , , . -ii-:. , , ! . ., .. . .._ ..... . : . ...,... . ,--.--,-7- • ." ..• . ,. .� . - ; i I �, =t-;t '?ti__ Mfr=' :: .� .". • -;_.r..5•. --:- _ :-. .. -1-! •-4----�-j•._... .4......._. ,..- - .. ..�__!. - -�.-•.;. -_.,..__._ ;.__.. :. ._. _ !..1. 1 1 i• 1 ' . , • L . • . FEB 28 '01 07:38PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS3ION RESULT REPORT (OCT 04 '00 P.5/518AM) MOP' 9LDG SYSTEMS (AUTO) THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 096 MEMORY TX 15035981960 02/02 OK ...t ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION . ii.,. MIMI=MI PICIDINtri BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. P.Q.Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. AumSvSILe,OR 97325 Phone L5031 749 449 roc 603)7494950 htm://www+mGS-rfOdu1ar.com FAX COVER LETTER Date: 1 b14 l .a GC MPANY: CAT-t b 1 Fez ma (5 516 -tctL-o 0•67 .. Mgli. FEB E8 '01 07:37PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P.1/5 ■rig■ mom. MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. P.O. Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. Aumslille, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749-4949 Fax: (503) 749-4950 http://www.mbs-modular_com FAX COVER LETTER DATE: 7,1Zol I TO: Vt_uid k{bWv- COMPANY: cAiy o r -n ,.. FAX: Cc);\ to 548 - t9l,0 FROM: '`)+ �Z-f RE: Ntstikie,%1 1 Cit. Z to-t`b003 [u. Zoo-rp 006 Z la,' &- NUMBER OF PAi CES: FAX COVER LETTER + 4- PAGES MESSAGE: I 1 ` tLr OCT 3 Py oc r. 4_ per, —Pt-z--00-I CAPE/1- Pr X1 --c-, E. A-rrNw C- - S► 8-`o _ CA1-11r & HA& 147 Od Pt, .l A_ Z. VE- ti-iwI..i,'0 C 4 - 5 RA(Jcio ►art Dboz,,,r-setl-ti) s),_____________KA-t y■ Nr----E-- s,m,c- - , -N-E 14Ft. nS Am- 4ArPPi Gb-r A- AT' C�� 'II kg- COPY TOT�LLOW IN E MAIL YES LINO tv �i � ' If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as possl a at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-4950_ QL C4\'O\' 1= — --W *NI T-------____-------- 96.16' +t4.41 0 ( °-- - — .... EXISTG 0 SEE /' j .. cI TAIL 3 •-- I°I / -11—. di a � \---- 9 I 30.01)( )- 1'\ f 58.5' � 6' E)cTRUPEP CURB Q N I rN I +�_.--.__ c t i X31`t 3�' MIN. APRON I -'�� N. _?_I REFER TO DUJG o0 ,y DC 4 ( - "142 3.9 9ED e I ,� e ''• 3m'-O' y 4' 0 '� �' a - (11. - ---0- - -- - -- -_44.,*. .-,.._\ _ _ _ _ i=> 1 1B'-6• '-m' ' 22'-6' ± -1 1: • ! 1 r _ /6 �/ ` ��` x w I/ (NI O 7 �� .-,., _ 9183; -..-� ,-„z- B Z /7.,..,, ;30 .. \ f94-1. in "\t'l . : . n dal p 1_1 es E / N \ _■ . a t z 61 x°� Q s-5. 0-44, V 4' c� N - °; •i� \ O• I) � fY I -01 1]\a • A 0� '' ,.. 01DEWAfLK TO 1 z _ /'� ' . ' a r 1, r HALf BTFEFT Iv � I cz. till• y 4 .- * GAS a� 'i ' ♦ TO WATER -g Q- - :zEAN Cr —� --- __9 i-W.� - � UNITS TYP. I I w CID 1 . m r --- - I�----�� 99.3 \ Q -IQ°e 1 to 1'-9' I _m1� I 1�1.1�' ' \ ' NI Z + 36'-0' , w 1-12 a I a 1 a+ Iw p MI \ 1 r� : -1 ,LL1 ILp EXIST'G HOUSE 9315 rrr 10 il �i +--z l _ 1344 SF. '� 81x8' .° O Vb / 1 FF. : Im1bT' '.., DECK - N 1 n 0 . � I0 FEB 28 '01 07:39PM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS P. 1/2 '�� MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. P.O. Box 110/9493 Porter Rd. AumSville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749-4949 Fax; (503) 749-4950 lhttp://www_mds-modular_com FAX COVER LETTER DATE: 7ik61 TO: YrEvlts y�ui�Co COMPANY: CATM b 1l,A'7 FAX: FROM: 6 M 1u% e RE. %VA51Au,che,4 NUMBER OF PAGES: FAX COVER LETTER + PAGES MESSAGE: HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES [ NO If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as possible at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-4950. 7 PEB 2B '81 �7 39PM MODERN_BLDG SYSTEMS • P 2/2 aiJ6 4 ,g n =VPM riiuE B P.i Date : _1%5L6L1.- -_, Q_ Dear Sirs, t We. have reviewed your plaann and/or attachments for the proposed development at _-_�' Sv,..._�1!!S�-...� ._ ___. and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions: I • I1 ' & i_� .i.:..[ � I ' ' -1! _ I 0 1 /, ! W I X _ i. 1 4 I Its '•• '.'_/ /. '/ L! "1 "_i 4P .4w ' ' . , _ d' . ire % . /, ! i .— Av. . _ _•�� 1 '. / i'_ • I. t.!!' fl)r & . 4 �t �l ad pcdLc4Up'' . . ____ Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC . L41.101,14- et- c g-g bwvk e4244014-0X, trp' ,1 , ivay, reoruary 10, zuui 1:6:1 isM Walter H. Knapp 503-265-8117 p.02 5,DE -ouso3- Walter H. Knapp Silviculture&Forest Management Urban Forestry February 16, 2001 Ms. Karen Fox City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ms. Fox: On February 12, I visited the Rasmussen project at 9375 SW Coral in Tigard. I verified that the sizes, locations, and numbering of the trees are correct, and that protection fencing has been installed. Please note that I reexamined tree number 5, an English walnut, and determined that it is unstable. The root plate on the north side of the tree, adjacent to the existing house, is rising. This is resulting in a progressive lean, and the tree could fail at any time. This tree should be removed prior to construction. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding my findings. Sincerely, Walter H. Knapp Certified Forester,SAF Certified Arborist,ISA PN-0497 • 7615 SW Dunsntuir Lane,Beaverton, OR 97007 Phone:(503)646-4349;Fax: (503)265-8117 M,;R 13 '01 09:4dHM MUDLKN tiLU( 5 Y I tl"15 r. 1,.. ..di Fla__,■. why... r MODERN BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC_ P.O. Box 110 /9493 Porter Rd. Aumsville, OR 97325 Phone: (503) 749-4949 Fax: (503) 749-4950 tlttp: //www.mbs-modular.COm FAX COVER LETTER DATE: 31 k( ?A,u l TO: . • P1 .! CASR - COMPANY: co-1 6r_ n,,,,„,0 FAX: (c-\ 5-18_v1 ,0 FROM: `_ ` 51. .4SS - RE. 1ANL), RU- NUMBER OF PAGES: FAX COVER LETTER + PAGES MESSAGE L' t s r L' c v HilLtik p.k. GAJ+ [� • c,D) L SI 6 b • .' ? C P1ut-u '; ,.I. 7 la, L ME. 6-LL) S15. V-ID •1 HARD COPY TO FOLLOW IN THE MAIL YES n NO If you do not receive all pages, please call us as soon as poss' le at (503) 749-4949, our dedicated fax number is (503) 749-49 0. 57 00 )° . MPR 13 '01 0y:4tjH11 MUULKIY tiLUb r 5 I tri5 1LLERS SANITARY SERVICE ,-;-• -, Box 4217 A Beaverton,OR 97076.4217 ' 'i' - 503.644-6161 / ,-< Phone: r " '' :' Fax: 503-643-3462 • Fax: 503-6 Millars5anitation@wm.com A SERVICE OF WAiTE MANAGEMENT • F A X 1,1- 1.---------4 DATE d J 3 a Q ( ___ /' _ J d / FAX NUMBER :/ 3• " �+-0:- �� ILL_ • ..... ..diCi . jr , FAX NUMBER; 643-3462 FROM: cle , IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH• THIS TRA)SMMI'�"TA, IPLEASE CALL MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC. AT (503) TO".^-nR • _ -... - .; tea•. . //`1 ' , Jr _- MESSAGE -' s �• r .0, __ J _. .. - ' i ice_ /� •- fAriAr; --A _c_—__— - _ _ .�..._.�� � .. . OF PACES : • . (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) I",?R 13 '01 09 48AM MODERN BLDG SYSTEMS ' r.�'3 Date . Dear Sirs , osed tan and/or attachments for the prof we have reviewed your p development at f- and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following exceptions ;i - /,s_ I /l i/ . // - .. to -he Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these materials for our review. MILLER' S •SANITARY"SERVICE, /NC.-'' Lir ‘ja_j F(4r-.1672-4-1;..L.) . . Opt__ e-491447 Raerlall't, . .