Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2000-00008
SDR2000 - 00008 SOURCE ONE NETWORK • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION ` . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00008 l'd'i CRY OF TIGARD "SOURCE ONE NETWORK" Community(Deveropment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/22/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with,associated site improvements. APPLICANT/ Philip and Rebecca Goold APPLICANT'S Laurie Lamoreaux OWNER: 11670 SW 67th REP.: CIDA, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008—SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 1 OF 23 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 1. Submit a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick. 2. Submit a revised plan that provides one more tree along SW 67th (for a total of 3) and 3 more trees along SW Baylor (for a total of 5) spaced no more than 15 feet apart or revise the proposed trees to a large stature tree. 3. Submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their needs. 4. Submit details (size, location, etc) of the refuse container or storage location for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. If the location is to be outside of the proposed building, the enclosure must be screened in accordance with the landscaping standards of Section 18.745.050.E.4. 5. Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be installed where the parking spaces abut landscaping or walkways. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows a bicycle rack, accommodating 2 bicycle parking spaces will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. 7. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, pay the tree mitigation fee in-lieu for 54 inches. The fee in-lieu cost is based on an estimate of the cost to purchase and plant the same number of inches on-site. Mitigation is based on a 2-inch tree or larger. 9. Submit a revised elevations plan that shows the 50% window requirement will be met. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 11. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 2 OF 23 ' 13. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street to provide enough right-of-way to fit a City standard wheel chair ramp at the corner. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerlines. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 14. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local service street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; I. street signs; J. driveway apron; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 67th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 15. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will install street trees along the frontage of SW Baylor Street. 16. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a new 6-inch public sanitary sewer line from the existing manhole in SW 67 Avenue (south of the site) northeasterly to the southwest corner of the site. At that point, a cleanout can be installed to facilitate the necessary private sewer service line to the adjacent property to the east. 17. An erosion control lan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 18. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of their sidewalk adjacent to SW Baylor Street. In addition, an 18-inch wide river rock strip shall be installed on the uphill-side of the strip drain. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 19. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and is currently $210.00 for every 2,640 sf of new impervious surfaces. The final fee will be calculated by the commercial plans examiner. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 20. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City,. and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 21. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 3 OF 23 22. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 67th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of • undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot.. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,750 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 23. Install all site improvements as per the final plans approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division. If any changes are necessary to any aspect of the site plans (landscaping, parking layout, etc.) approval must be obtained from the Planning Division even if the change is required by another City Department. Failure of the applicant to obtain approval will delay inspections until formal approval can be granted and may result in significant site changes necessary to remedy the situation. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the address (11670 SW 67th). Based on this search, staff found a Site Development Review approval had been granted to change the use from a residence to a commercial business in 1992 (SDR92-02), however, the conditions were not met and the approval expired. The site, however, has been used as a business since that time. Based on notes in the computer, enforcement action was taken. This application will bring the property into compliance. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the southeast corner of SW Baylor and SW 67th. The site is bordered on all sides by property zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE). The property to the east and south is developed with existing commercial businesses. The properties to the north and west are separated by streets and developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site currently has an existing structure that was converted from a residence to a commercial business. The proposal will remove the existing structure and construct a new 2,994 square foot office building with associated warehousing. The property is located at 11670 SW 67 Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. The applicant has submitted a service provider letter from USA indicating there are no sensitive land areas on the site. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Tigard Triangle Design Standards Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 'Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 (Signs)Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 4 OF 23 SECTION V. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS: Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting,the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be granted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standard(s) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not significantly detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The proposal meets the Design option because the property is abutting 2 streets and is not more than 100 feet along either frontage. FINDING: Because the proposal meets the design option, the Street Connectivity Standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 5 OF 23 Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials and the street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Neither SW Baylor nor SW 67th Avenue is a Major or Minor Arterial, therefore, this standard does not apply. Building setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 11/2 feet from the property line fronting SW 67th Avenue and 6 feet from the property line fronting SW Baylor, therefore, this standard is met. Front yard setback design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard- surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and the public street. Landscaping and walkways will be discussed further in this decision. Walkway connection to building entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plans show a 6-foot-wide sidewalk will be provided from the main entrance to SW 67` Avenue. Parking location and landscape design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. The site is on a corner lot. The building is oriented at the corner with parking to the side and rear of the building, therefore, this standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Site Design Standards have been met. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) are satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 6 OF 23 ' Ground floor windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the round floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. The 67th Avenue frontage meets this standard by providing 126 square feet of window area where 123 square feet of window area is required. The SW Baylor frontage does not meet this standard, however, because 270 square feet of window area is required whereas only 204 square feet is provided. The window area is measured from 3 feet above grade to 9 feet above grade. Due to the sloping topography, staff took the straight line measurement instead of requiring the window area to follow the lines of the slope. Building facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The west elevation is not greater than 50 feet in length. The north elevation is greater than 50 feet but a covered entry with pillars is provided which breaks up the line of the building, thus meeting this standard. Weather protection: Weather rotection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. The plans provide for a canopy at both the north and south entrances to the building. Building materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be wood with brick veneer on the lower level. The proposed building materials meet this standard. Roofs and roof lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Roof-mounted equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 7 OF 23 No roof mounted equipment is shown on the plans or anticipated due to the type of roof proposed. The narrative indicates that all mechanical devices will be located inside the • attic space. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, all of the Tigard Triangle Building Design Standards have not been fully met, however, if the condition below is met, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Submit a revised elevations plan that shows the 50% window requirement will be met. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant's plans show a proposed wall sign which meets the standards listed above. The permitting of signs, however, is done through a separate process administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Full compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at that time. A sign permit must be obtained for ANY sign located on the property. FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required when a sign permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposal does not abut a major or minor arterial, therefore, the L-1 standards do not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 8 OF 23 L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing, of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a local street, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Section 18.745. Compliance with Landscaping and Screening standards is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Because the landscape standards of Section 18.745 are required in-lieu of the L-1 or L-2 landscape standards and because the landscape standards of Section 18.745 are discussed further in this decision, the landscaping and screening standards of the TTDS have been satisfied. B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, f8.705, 18.745, 18.755: 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a walkway will be provided from the street to the north and south building entrances. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkways will not cross the access drive or parking lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. While it appears that the walkways will be concrete, staff can not confirm this from the plans provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 9 OF 23 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has 1 point of access into the parking lot that provides 25 feet of pavement. The access is 30 feet wide at the site entrance. • FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the access and egress standards have been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick, the access, egress and circulation standards will be fully met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has provided a plan that shoe .s 2 Flowering Dogwood street trees will be provided along the SW Baylor and the SW 67 Street frontage. The Western Garden Book indicates that this type of tree is broad spreading and can grow to 20 feet in height. A tree less than 25 feet is considered a small stature tree which requires spacing no further than 15 feet apart. The TTDS states that street trees along local streets shall be broad spreading and spaced no more than 22 feet on center. After taking into consideration vision clearance needs, it appears that 1 more tree can be installed along SW 67 and 3 more trees can be installed along SW Baylor. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. - The property to the south and east are adjacent to the subject site but developed with commercial businesses. The properties to the north and west are separated by a street, therefore, no buffer is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Most of the parking lot is below adjacent properties, separated by a retaining wall. The parking is not visible from SW Baylor. The parking along the SW 67th Street frontage will be screened by Emerald Gaiety Euonymus and Kinnikinnick. Because only 7 spaces are proposed and required, only one parking lot tree is required. The plan provides for 5 trees around the parking lot. Four of the proposed trees are extra and mitigation eligible. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 10 OF 23 Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; All equipment is proposed to be located in the attic space, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public • street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans do not show service facilities. The narrative indicates that trash will be stored inside and presumably brought out to the curb on garbage day. This is discussed further in this decision. Assuming this method of disposal is acceptable, this standard is met because no trash facilities will be stored outside. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that provides one more tree along SW 67th (for a total of 3) and 3 more trees along SW Baylor (for a total of 5) spaced no more than 15 feet apart, or revise the proposed trees to be a large stature tree. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's narrative indicates that trash will be stored inside. Staff is assuming that the proposal is to store trash and recyclables inside and bring them out to the curb on trash days. The applicant has not, however, provided any information for staff to confirm that one of the four compliance methods will be met. The applicant has also not provided written sign-off that the location of the proposed trash pick up will be accessible to their trucks. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 11 OF 23 . • The applicant is conditioned to submit plans that show the location of the proposed refuse . container. In order to insure that the refuse container is in a location accessible to collectors, the applicant must submit written sign-off from the trash hauler that the proposed locations are sufficient to meet their needs. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. If the enclosure must be outside (due to the size and volume of trash anticipated) The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: • Submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their needs • Submit details (size, location, etc) of the refuse container or storage location for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. If the location is to be outside of the proposed building, the enclosure must be screened in accordance with the landscaping standards of Section 18.745.050.E.4. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The plans do not provide for or require more than 20 parking spaces, therefore, carpool/vanpool parking is not required. Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 7 parking spaces, therefore, 1 van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle) ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show the ADA space will be 9 feet wide with an 8 foot aisle, therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 12 OF 23 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and has been discussed previously in this decision. Vision clearance will be addressed further in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and none is proposed through the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The interior drives are two-way and do not require additional markings. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The plans do not provide wheel stops where the parking is adjacent to the landscaping. In order to meet this standard, the applicant must submit a revised plan that provides wheel stops where the parking is adjacent to landscaping. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate the standard parking spaces will be 8.5 feet by 18.5 feet. The access aisle will be 24 feet wide, thus satisfying the criteria. No compact spaces are proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 13 OF 23 • Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The plans do not indicate that a bicycle rack will be provided. A condition is necessary for the applicant to submit plans that show a bicycle rack will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for General Office, .5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and for Warehouse uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, therefore, 2 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. The applicant's plan does not show bicycle parking spaces will be provided, therefore, a condition of approval is necessary. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Uses is 2.7 spaces per 1000 square feet and the maximum is 3.4 spaces per 1000 square feet. The minimum parking for warehouse uses is .5 spaces per 1000 square feet and the maximum is .8 spaces per 1000 square feet. The applicant is, therefore, required to provide a minimum of 6.3 parking spaces which is rounded up according to the Code (Section 18.765.070.C.1) and a maximum of 8.04 (9). The plans provide 7 parking spaces, therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 14 OF 23 Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is less than 10,000 square feet, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be installed where the parking spaces abut landscaping or walkways. • Submit a revised plan that shows a bicycle rack, accommodating 2 bicycle parking spaces will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted an arborist report that indicates there are 3 trees on site greater than 12 inches in diameter. The total inches of these 3 trees is 70 inches. The applicant will be removing all of the existing trees on-site, therefore, 100% mitigation is required. The applicant will be providing 16 inches on-site by providing additional trees and over-sizing required trees. The remaining inches will be mitigated via the fee-in-lieu. The applicant must pay the fee in-lieu prior to construction and submit a bond or irrevocably letter of credit for the on-site mitigation inches. FINDING: Because the applicant has not actually paid the fee in-lieu and mitigated the required inches, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Prior to issuance of building permits, pay the tree mitigation fee in-lieu for 54 inches. The fee in-lieu cost is based on an estimate of the cost to purchase and plant the same number of inches on-site. Mitigation is based on a 2-inch tree or larger. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 15 OF 23 Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and 'a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The landscape plan submitted shows no trees or shrubs over 3 feet in height will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas on both sides of the driveway. Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards supercede other standards of the development code, the vision clearance standards are not applicable at the lot corner due to the building location requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. B. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). - Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. The building location is at the corner, thus providing adequate light and air circulation for neighboring properties. Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division, however, they have not provided comments that the plans do not satisfy the fire code requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 16 OF 23 Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular term and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a-height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and indicated that they do not have any objections to the plan as proposed. FINDING: Because the Police Department has indicated that the lighting plan and site layout is adequate, the Crime Prevention and Safety standards are met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development pro osal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Baylor and SW 67th which are not on Tri-met transit routes, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or-this title, e.g. Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct new office/warehouse building. The zone is MUE, which allows office uses and warehousing that is associated with another permitted use. The warehouse use is less than 50% of the proposed office use, thus meeting the criteria. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table below, the proposal fully complies. STANDARD MUE ZONE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 7,500 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. >50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard Oft. 6 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 0 ft. 1.5 ft - Side yard 0/20 ft. [3] 1.5 ft. - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [3] 61 ft. Maximum Height 45 ft. 29 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 84% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 16% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 40% 39% NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 17 OF 23 [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and Impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (18.810) Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: • Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local service street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street, both of which are classified as local service streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on both streets, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No additional dedications along the frontages are needed, with the exception of the northwest corner of the site. A ROW radius is necessary at the intersection of the two streets. A 25-foot ROW radius is needed at intersections of two local service streets. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate enough of a ROW radius to provide for a City standard wheel chair ramp at the corner within the ROW prior to construction. The applicant's plans do not show this dedication and the narrative does not mention it. - SW 67th Avenue is currently paved, but is not fully improved to meet the TTDS. The applicant's plans indicate that they will mitigate their impact on this roadway by constructing a half-street improvement adjacent to their frontage. SW Baylor Street is currently improved with curb and sidewalk. The only improvements needed are street trees. The applicant's landscape plan shows that they will plant street trees along the Baylor Street frontage. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A sidewalk exists along the frontage cf SW Baylor Street, and one will be installed by the applicant along the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 18 OF 23 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The nearest public sanitary sewer line to this site is arl 8-inch line in SW Baylor Street, with a manhole located in the intersection with SW 67 Avenue. The other sewer line is located in SW 67 Avenue, with the last manhole located south of this site approximately 130 feet south of this site. The applicant's engineer discovered that the existing building on this site is served from a private sewer line that was extended diagonally across this site from the manhole in SW 67 Avenue/SW Baylor Street. In addition, they found that the property to the east is also connected to their onsite private sanitary sewer line. No records were found to indicate whether or not the adjacent property owner obtained permits for this connection, or whether or not they obtained approval from the prior property owner of this site to make that connection. With the advent of this new building proposal, the diagonal sewer line across this site must be removed. In order to maintain sewer service or the adjacent parcel to the east, Staff worked with the applicant's engineer toward a solution. The solution is that the applicant will exend a new 6-inch public sewer line from the sewer manhole south of this site in SW 67 Avenue. The new 6-inch line will be extended in a northeasterly direction to a point along the southwest corner of this site where a cleanout will be installed. From the cleanout, a revised sewer service line will be installed to intercept the existing service line that feeds the adjacent parcel to the east. Staff has reviewed the proposed plan and supports the layout. A public improvement permit will be required for the work in the ROW, and a plumbing permit will be required for any sewer work on the private properties. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This plan appears to accommodate any upstream storm water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer .that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is also not required if the net increase in impervious surfaces is less than 5,000 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 19 OF 23 The applicant's plan indicates that the surface water runoff from this site will be directed toward the southwest gomer of the site where it will be discharged into the existing roadside ditch in SW 67 Avenue. The net increase in impervious area on this site is approximately 5,295 square feet. The increase is slightly over the 5,000 square foot threshold that Staff normally uses in determining if onsite detention is required. In this case, there does not appear to be a downstream storm drainage problem, and due to the small size of this site, Staff recommends that an onsite detention facility not be required. The Building Division raised a concern with the proposed French drain to be located at the foot of the slope adjacent to SW Baylor Street. The French drain was proposed in order to Sprevent surface water runoff from the slope from flowing across the applicant's sidewalk. taff, including the Building Division, met with the applicant's engineer and it was agreed that the applicant would install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of the applicant's sidewalk, rather than a French drain. In addition, the applicant will install an 18-inch river rock strip on the uphill side of the strip drain to help keep the strip drain clean of debris. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. This project site does not abut a bikeway identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan, therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontages of SW 67th Avenue and SV Baylor Street. However, the services to this site will come from the lines along SW 67` Avenue; therefore, this code provision will only apply to the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 100 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $2,750.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 20 OF 23 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing public water lines in the adjacent streets, and the applicant's plans indicate that they intend to utilize the existing water service for the site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer provided a letter requesting a fee in-lieu of water quality facility be allowed on this project. The engineer points out that due to the building location standards of the TTDS, their driveway must be located near the south end of the frontage on SW 67 Avenue. The slope of the site near the southwest corner of the site are significant, and conflict with the required slopes of the new driveway. The topographic constraints prevent the installation of an effective facility that can treat all of the runoff from the site. In addition, this site is only 7,500 square feet in size, and there is a challenge for the applicant to meet the required floor area ratio, landscape areas and parking areas required by the TTDS. In summary, Staff supports payment of the fee in-lieu on this project. It is estimated that the net increase in impervious area is approximately 5,295 square feet. Based upon the current SDC for water quality of $210.00 per 2,640 sf of impervious area, the fee will be approximately $421.00. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division for review prior to construction. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. D. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact: the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard,and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 21 OF 23 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the develo ment. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an im act study addressing the pro1ect's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (III-) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $9,726 based on the use proposed (does not include any credits for the existing building). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $30,393 ($9,726 divided by 32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system ilh$20,667. The applicant has proposed to construct halt street improvements along SW 67 since this is the frontage they are obtaining access from. In addition condition of approval to dedicate right-of-way at the intersection of SW Baylor and SW 67 to provide a City standard wheel chair ram at the corner has been imposed. The cost of the dedication is expected to be minimal 10 at the most based on Piper square foot). The cost of half street improvements along W 67 is expected to be $20,000(100 feet x $200 per linear foot), thus it is roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. In any event, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Not happy with the french drain. What is the potential for offsetting flow entrapment of run-off from the west? What if any, maintenance agreements will they provide? Are they willing to save and hold harmless the City if overflow causes damage to the building? Staff Response: Engineering, Building and Planning staff met with the applicant's engineer to discuss These concerns. Details of necessary changes is discussed under the Street and Utility Improvement section of this decision. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: Although this is outside of,our Water Service Area, we do have a 12-inch transmission main located within SW 67 Avenue. Also,.we have two (2), 12-inch mains located within SW Baylor Street. Water service to be provided by TVWD. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: I would like to see them try to save the 24" Oak tree located adjacent to the driveway entrance and landscape area. It will take 50 years for their replacement trees to reach that size. It would seem the driveway.and parking area could be reconfigured to save the tree with no adverse impact on the project and perhaps save some mitigation fees. Staff Response: The location of the existing tree is too close to the driveway. The construction of the driveway would severely damage the tree roots. The driveway width is the minimum needed and can not be reduced in size to avoid damaging the tree. The City of Tigard Police Department and the City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division have reviewed the application and have not provided comments or objections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 22 OF 23 • SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the-body of this decision. A complete copy of the comments are a part of the file and are available for review. They also indicated that a Sensitive area exists on site, however, a service provider letter was provided by USA prior to the application being deemed complete that verifies there is no sensitive area on-site. Tualatin Valley Water District, TCI Cable, PGE, GTE, US West, and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: • X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 6, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 21, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 8ppLeat The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues,properly raised in the Notice ofAppeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 20, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 411,1 )4111X June 6. 2000 PREP ED BY: Juli owell Hajduk DATE Associate Planner L..—J , 1 June 6. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be s dorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpinyulia\sdr\Source One.doc dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 23 OF 23 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A ,it:V.. CTrr OF TIGARD SW 67TH AVENUE CCM[RLMC 8 w __ _.L. •� _ — •G00' 8 • ' --• • •i . \ • . 4 n • . n _ .—_. — o c 4 o •n • ._ I!, I - • I © Y 1` I ...___-1 e c ' n m - d • I • 8 co °M I a U.' (ilti r i I j e g i ;I o0L o - I O---2600 10 a00' 900 ' aon i 11 -.. -- -- 3300-_-- 1:00 •'- g ,i,∎ Q-_ off' I m 7 et, I m u 925 _ 135.E \' 3300' --76-O ' ° . 1 II 1 II Ill A );I '' 1 U ° ° 1 5 1 1 5 000000'E 100.00' ° n v n a 00 8 /.'1 0 I I I n CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-00008 SITE PLLAPI N , (Map is not to scale) SOURCE ONE NETWORK — — - --— — — — — —---L — ..CITY of TIGARb' GEOGRAPHIC IRFORUAT■OH SYSTEA i —__. VICINITY MAP i SDR2000-00008 SOURCE ONE A ST NETWORK [SITE 111 w v B LOR ST I �' / ST Q I N CLINTON_ I v 0 100 200 300 400 Feet ~ W I Z 1'=298 leer c co I IL I ' `4,46t....- s!+EQ!!.•A City of Tigard DARTMOUTH gill Information on this map Is for general location only and should be venfied with the Development Senates Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd E I Tigard.OR 97223 (507)679.4171 vv _ I httP f Cl hgartl or us Community Development Plot date May 2,2000,C:'maglc\MAGIC03 APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A •SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00008 1 CITY OF TIOARD SOURCE ONE NETWORK ska�muntty�e o me t pingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/22/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. APPLICANT/ Philip and Rebecca Goold APPLICANT'S Laurie Lamoreaux OWNER: 11670 SW 67th REP.: CIDA, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall: THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. ' All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 6, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 21, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 20, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A_ SW 67'AVENUE © I ro+ a 1 I r E .r4 Pr, 'f e s K a . a r 8 u S C N T °. ems! a ■ CITY OF TIGARD t �,SDR2000-00008 SITE PLAN N —OOOOO 91999.9C=C1 (Map is not to scale) SOURCE ONE NETWORK 1 1 / 1 VICINITY MAP I ∎ SDR2000-00008 1 �.I , II SOURCE ONE ATLAN'A�_l ST _�_.I NETWORK I I H �� ri tI TE I 1 1 1 1 �, 1 I I I 1 1 %__I,-1 i<LJ -- 1 I BAYLOR ST - ■ If III 1101 1 I I p , i --, I I � flj 1 _1 J i .,. ST M I 1I I1 I'_ DARTMOUTH ST I I I "-"� ....,a II ,,,_a w.. —________ PW Eete May 23000 LNU0KIMAWCO7 APR DATE: PLANS CHECK NO.: 6,-,2 -ca PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ' APPLICANT: • WORKSHEET MAILING ADDRESS.. (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) CITY/ZIP/PHONE: • RATE PER TAX MAP NO.: LAND USE CATEGORY TRIP SITUS NO.ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL • $201.00 , BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $51.00 (5 ,9-9 71 RA`s- 4-iJL -- ;(OFFICE $184.00 � �� � .9t� INDUSTRIAL $193.00 COP/r & J ;p s70c INSTITUTIONAL $83.00 t/0Nn) �6 /i r /�� y PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER (PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF WEEKDAY AVG.TRIP WEEKEND AVG.TRIP ER OCCUPANCY RATE Cerii57700ar .9 •U � . _ 99 y /3( —2/9a yv �gcfe-c °d- Ada BASIS: "'" .} • CALCULATIONS: rl r ��✓►^y� 1a1 a �r`p ��F _ AJ���(, P X 64s,..5 d'v� I lo. 3d X 2. 9R X I S V v g 97 , /a -is,-/77 ?i D i X , b0 /q3 753'117 PROJECT�TRI GENERATION: 3.--. • �. "7Z •�`� ! FEE: 9.--/A(0, 51 sa.b"7 o FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: • fsT1mo, , 0-r-01, ` r L U I ROAD AMT.: �'n ?) s �CI P /a�7z 1►'�C /�;ill.y WJC S �Lr' C. ri�6 kJJF� TRANSIT AMT.: "1 790.05 PR ARBY: 617/99 f:lsharefttrnglwpshare\cottkVAfprooedures manuafworksheet 99.00.doe CC: WASHINGTON COUNTY TIF NOTEBOOK NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIE ;LDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRhS THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION ►►,W SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping.A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 2, 2000 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00008 FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 16. 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk. Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 1. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of'any party to address a relevant approval criteria with $. :lent specificity may preclude 1 subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: - ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." 1 1 CIT of TIGARD•_' _ 1 I __ — 1-_I _I — .—_ VICINITY MAP i I I , ' i SDR2000-00008 ! SOURCE ONE '-- NETWORK i ATLANTA ri ST I CI I I I I / I r 1 1 I I I .1! I —1` LI I L i L ' I S - -- ` JL.LI' BAYLOR . I I L l I -I ! I IaI --1--._ , ,. ,I Q j 1-- ! , I I i- ---I , I I ! _. .r --- -- ....„......1 . I - i - —i I I I � ,I >- ,,.,, , 1 i I _ j ST ,. N Q __CLINTON___ ____ — — I - I cC I — I tm; FW- , jI1 1 I I - __I MI 1_ cDL _1 _ Z■ hs\ H----, i_ , , ___-,DARTMOUTH ST 1 I I I I ' \ .w.a ,. ;4:sa..,:„ In I. MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: June 1, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer 'F-S2 RE: SDR 2000-00008, Source One Network Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local service street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street, both of which are classified as local service streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on both streets, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No additional dedications along the frontages are needed, with the exception of the northwest corner of the site. A ROW radius is necessary at the intersection of the two streets. A 25-foot ROW radius is needed at intersections of two local service streets. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate a ROW radius equal to 25 feet prior to construction. The applicant's plans do not show this dedication and the narrative does not mention it. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 1 SW 67th Avenue is currently paved, but is not fully improved to meet the TTDS. The applicant's plans indicate that they will mitigate their impact on this roadway by constructing a half-street improvement adjacent to their frontage. SW Baylor Street is currently improved with curb and sidewalk. The only improvements needed are street trees. The applicant's landscape plan shows that they will plant street trees along the Baylor Street frontage. • Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A sidewalk exists along the frontage of SW Baylor Street, and one will be installed by the applicant along the frontage of SW 67th Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The nearest public sanitary sewer line to this site is an 8-inch line in SW Baylor Street, with a manhole located in the intersection with SW 67th Avenue. The other sewer line is located in SW 67th Avenue, with the last manhole located south of this site approximately 130 feet south of this site. The applicant's engineer discovered that the existing building on this site is served from a private sewer line that was extended diagonally across this site from the manhole in SW 67t" Avenue/SW Baylor Street. In addition, they found that the property to the east is also connected to their onsite private sanitary sewer line. No records were found to indicate whether or not the adjacent property owner obtained permits for this connection, or whether or not they obtained approval from the prior property owner of this site to make that connection. With the advent of this new building proposal, the diagonal sewer line across this site must be removed. In order to maintain sewer service for the adjacent parcel to the east, Staff worked with the applicant's engineer toward a solution. The solution is that the applicant will extend a new 6-inch public sewer line from the sewer manhole south of this site in SW 67th Avenue. The new 6- ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 2 inch line will be extended in a northeasterly direction to a point along the southwest corner of this site where a cleanout will be installed. From the cleanout, a revised sewer service line will be installed to intercept the existing service line that feeds the adjacent parcel to the east. Staff has reviewed the proposed plan and supports the layout. A public improvement permit will be required for the work in the ROW, and a plumbing permit will be required for any sewer work on the private properties. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This plan appears to accommodate any upstream storm water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 3 J will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is also not required if the net increase in impervious surfaces is less than 5,000 square feet. The applicant's plan indicates that the surface water runoff from this site will be directed toward the southwest corner of the site where it will be discharged into the existing roadside ditch in SW 67th Avenue. The net increase in impervious area on this site is approximately 5,295 square feet. The increase is slightly over the 5,000 square foot threshold that Staff normally uses in determining if onsite detention is required. In this case, there does not appear to be a downstream storm drainage problem, and due to the small size of this site, Staff recommends that an onsite detention facility not be required. The Building Division raised a concern with the proposed French drain to be located at the foot of the slope adjacent to SW Baylor Street. The French drain was proposed in order to prevent surface water runoff from the slope from flowing across the applicant's sidewalk. Staff, including the Building Division, met with the applicant's engineer and it was agreed that the applicant would install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of the applicant's sidewalk, rather than a French drain. In addition, the applicant will install an 18-inch river rock strip on the uphill side of the strip drain to help keep the strip drain clean of debris. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. 9????9999??99????99''' Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 4 Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontages of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street. However, the services to this site will come from the lines along SW 67th Avenue; therefore, this code provision will only apply to the frontage of SW 67th Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 100 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,750.00. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 5 1 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing public water lines in the adjacent streets, and the applicant's plans indicate that they intend to utilize the existing water service for the site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer provided a letter requesting a fee in-lieu of water quality facility be allowed on this project. The engineer points out that due to the building location standards of the TTDS, their driveway must be located near the south end of the frontage on SW 67th Avenue. The slope of the site near the southwest corner of the site are significant, and conflict with the required slopes of the new driveway. The topographic constraints prevent the installation of an effective facility that can treat all of the runoff from the site. In addition, this site is only 7,500 square feet in size, and there is a challenge for the applicant to meet the required floor area ratio, landscape areas and parking areas required by the TTDS. In summary, Staff supports payment of the fee in-lieu on this project. It is estimated that the net increase in impervious area is approximately 5,295 square feet. Based upon the current SDC for water quality of $210.00 per 2,640 sf of impervious area, the fee will be approximately $421.00. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 6 erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division for review prior to construction. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 7 Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street to provide a 25-foot right-of-way radius. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerlines. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 67t Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local service street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; I. street signs; • J. driveway apron; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 67th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will install street trees along the frontage of SW Baylor Street. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a new 6-inch public sanitary sewer line from the existing manhole in SW 67th Avenue (south of the site) northeasterly to the southwest corner of the site. At that point, a cleanout can be installed to facilitate the necessary private sewer service line to the adjacent property to the east. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of their sidewalk adjacent to SW Baylor Street. In addition, an 18-inch wide river rock strip shall be installed on the uphill side of the strip drain. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 8 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and is currently $210.00 for every 2,640 sf of new impervious surfaces. The final fee will be calculated by the commercial plans examiner. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 67th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,750.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. I\eng\bnanr\comments\sdr sd2000-00008 doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00008 Source One Network PAGE 9 05/09/00 TUE 09:05 FAX 503 591 0986 TVWD ENGINEERING Q001 a » REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY o IIGARD • Community(Development Shaping (Better Community DATE May 2,2000 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District Administrative Offices ( } FROM: City otUgard Planning Division Ii, -0t STAFF CONTACT: Oldie Powell Halduk,Ass a late Planner 1x401) 3 6Z' hone: (503)63941W11-Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE , REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Pram provide die foiro wing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: �� rj}$„'t i Phone Mumber(s): Wit 2-- 30 2-.5- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ` CITY OF TIG ARD Community Devetopment Sfaping A Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer MAY 0 5 2000 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORT 2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK Q PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide tke foltowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: \1\)0\ c I Phone Number(sl: 4.,vi4 I �A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ` ���� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 ►cw►Lw i—q-cicseAl TO: US West Communications RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAY 0 5-2000 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner 0(4011 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: vrl � / oIe, (-s E ASCA)Es-r 1-- 1212'io2/ (Please provide the follintring information)Name of Personts)Commenting: ;)1e l-1OQb 7-A Cie_SO Phone Numberfs): 563— 2 y 2, `i,55I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIGARD Comm uCommunity'Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAY 0 5 2000 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner 1x4071 Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRJ 2000-00008 SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: � AL, ,4R.t1e ,A) Fl 1k4In1 . W/w4r 1,5 TfIF /1mrr-4-na. roe F-` r12-4rOj�(_„r; i 21Jc rnf F-4-0/, T7— cuss; u�,�/,F y AlA,a-r-u.4cE AG,e.F.f, 77if L(/rcC. r' SAr(JA //t'L,) f 'Iii. P'T Tat-6 lc 0 2 A.'Gt1 7-0 71-1E-, 1u-itc4 (TCease provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 PLANNING TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAY RECEIVED 0 3 2000 7 C CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x4011 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. V Written comments provided below: A-CTM-ouul-t This ow7:sioE Or 642_ Llia-7-6- - ta 6- Do #41-4v4- k (2-im u.- 7t5 M /NJ 4/44 1,1 Le c a-Yrt 9 44 1 r*ri,u 5l,./ te772.4 A-Vs. Aso r�lr -7.fr/t (2, r 2.—fi lc-k*1' �1/I/4-11V.� (vC-ii TED J LIT1���i �>Iv.� �:.. m-0-t om 5-i. G.l A-TE1L_ .43grcu r e - PfLevi b 73y 1v&)® . (Please provide the foltowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: / lu�a I Phone Numbertsl: x �; � REQUEST FOR COMMENTS '44171(11" CITY OF TIOARD Community 2)eve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department MAY 0 5 2000 FROM: City 01 Tigard Planning Division CITY OF rip STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk,Associate Planner(x4011 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK Q PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. !Nov are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the o os and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. 1 lease refer to the enclosed letter( Written comments provide below: wtJ„0 (L4 avx_ ,gta& -ae ,cvyle ea,i. dee fAXV 6-46 � co - ' . Ms - , ait .J 1 ✓ :/1L2,, 44 I [tai �.L.:�. . LLB .J.!_ _/'i_ _ i i / �..u.. 4 (2'lease provide the following information)Name of Persons]Commenting:.t�9✓ZQ Phone Number's]: �1it J � G�����( X3 3 � REQUEST FOR COMITSLANNING CI OFTIIGARD Community Devetopment MAY 1 5 2000 Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 CiTV OF TIGARD TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division MAY 0 3 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk,Associate Planner[x4071 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00008 SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tease provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: I Phone Number[s): r Lo UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2000 TO: Julia Hajduk, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA a SUBJECT: Source One Network, SDR 2000-00008 On February 22, 2000 the Unified Sewerage Agency ("USA") Board of Directors adopted USA Resolution and Order 00-7 (R&O 00-7). R&O 00-7 applies immediately to all development, unless the development is authorized by approval of a land use application that was received by a land use authority on or before February 4, 2000 and was approved or deemed complete by the land use jurisdiction on or before March 15, 2000. SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists within 200 feet of development. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. • Further investigation/site assessment will be required. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 --- ,• ... ............, 11 lijr" t" A • lik i or Aignit la .11 will l'am _ . .,,s wag I Palialli ' orry ,-1 usse L swir.....ael 01 ...Olt 11,41111 ' woo,, oi . si. i nolidi-I - -----m. Tag 10353900 tn liarier, I 11111111111S pr. pm ism ror ,, me • 1--- le II, 1111110 WM !II 511111111111 1111 iled :110 ir 111111 I . NM 5 imm will■ IS \la 111111111WP WI 111' 52 Tral14,,„ 0111111■11411 les esnAgia, iilli NI AA ,- 1110:16 pitersliww11 trillia c°b 111141i 51111474 iii 10 .41 a fier E_ 1,......6 a a al. a ago liturd -ry- SNAP 01 Noma wi 1201101 owls A•gui- er REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY IIIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 2,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Halduk,Associate Planner(x401) Phone: (503)639.4111/Fax (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00008 ➢ SOURCE ONE NETWORK Q PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 16,2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the foaowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number(sl: WOOF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMIOTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILENOESI: S/>Q 7,-)<- {-)<-k )<--R FILE NAMEISJ: •-' o,-,-e r-7''7' 77/4./r /,e L CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central I East ❑ South ❑ West ❑ Also Place For Review in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith.Supervisor _ COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Dvlpmnt.Svcs.Technicians POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf.Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official !- ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Roger,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley.City Recorder i. OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy.Property Manager V PLANNER- TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL. HILLS PARK& REC. DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE &RESCUE ♦ _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * _ UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15107 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 145 155 N.first Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton.OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * OR. DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street, NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/zOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR. DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N. First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Scott King(cPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Jim Tice(Ica) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Phil Healy(General Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 Sr.Cartographer iceazcAtftsra Portland,OR 97204 _Jim Nims(zcA)MS 15 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A * _Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (Revised: 21-Apr-00) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R, BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo, President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C. Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexatcns Or Pat McGann or Project is Within Y.Mlle of A Trans¢Route) -5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO3O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps E of HaiVN.o199W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Joy-Gay Pahl, Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 *INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT If WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). MAILING RECORDS A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING �FTIG CITYOFT,: Community(Development ShaprngA(BetterCommunrty STATE of OREGON" ) County of Washington )ss. City of 7"igard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appopnate Box(s)Bebw) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00008/SOURCE ONE NETWORK O AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: Ci ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council 0 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:l ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/14nd of Notice) FOR: G=7 I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE'S) of which is attached, market a'I ibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhi I t"B",on lune 6,2000 ,- .. dep.:ied i e United States Mail on lune 6,2000, postage prepaid. moron ' .ar-• ..fie) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the i day of j--14._ (y , 2000. +�•, OFFICIAL SEAL ��"�� � � : _�; ; SHERNiAId S.GASPER O 11�U�Ulf GUN MY C NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ` «� COMMISSION Nr, 323409 My Commission Expires: �-trj /?J 2013 MY COMMISSION D(PIRCS "A`!13,2003 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 41,4. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00008 CITY OF TIOARDJ SOURCE ONE NETWORK CommumtyDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/22/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. APPLICANT/ Philip and Rebecca Goold APPLICANT'S Laurie Lamoreaux OWNER: 11670 SW 67th REP.: CIDA, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Portland, OR 97201 LOCATION: 11670 SW 67t Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008—SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 1 OF 23 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 1. Submit a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick. 2. Submit a revised plan that provides one more tree along SW 67th (for a total of 3) and 3 more trees along SW Baylor (for a total of 5) spaced no more than 15 feet apart or revise the proposed trees to a large stature tree. 3. Submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their needs. 4. Submit details (size, location, etc) of the refuse container or storage location for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. If the location is to be outside of the proposed building, the enclosure must be screened in accordance with the landscaping standards of Section 18.745.050.E.4. 5. Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be installed where the parking spaces abut landscaping or walkways. 6. Submit a revised plan that shows a bicycle rack, accommodating 2 bicycle parking spaces will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. 7. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, pay the tree mitigation fee in-lieu for 54 inches. The fee in-lieu cost is based on an estimate of the cost to purchase and plant the same number of inches on-site. Mitigation is based on a 2-inch tree or larger. 9. Submit a revised elevations plan that shows the 50% window requirement will be met. Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 11. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 2 OF 23 13. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street to provide enough right-of-way to fit a City standard wheel chair ramp at the corner. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of- way centerlines. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 14. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local service street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 6 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements; G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; street signs; J. driveway apron; and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 67th Avenue in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 15. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will install street trees along the frontage of SW Baylor Street. 16. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a new 6-inch public sanitary sewer line from the existing manhole in SW 67 Avenue (south of the site) northeasterly to the southwest corner of the site. At that point, a cleanout can be installed to facilitate the necessary private sewer service line to the adjacent property to the east. 17. An erosion control lan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994." 18. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of their sidewalk adjacent to SW Baylor Street. In addition, an 18-inch wide river rock strip shall be installed on the uphill side of the strip drain. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: 19. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and is currently $210.00 for every 2,640 sf of new impervious surfaces. The final fee will be calculated by the commercial plans examiner. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION BEING PERFORMED OR OCCUPANCY: 20. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 21. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 3 OF 23 2. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 67th Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $2,750 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Julia Hajduk. 23. Install all site improvements as per the final plans approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division. If any changes are necessary to any aspect of the site plans Dlandscaping, parking layout, etc.) approval must be obtained from the Planning ivision even if the change is required by another City Department. Failure of the applicant to obtain approval will delay inspections until formal approval can be granted and may result in significant site changes necessary to remedy the situation. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS . FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the address (11670 SW 67th). Based on this search, staff found a Site Development Review approval had been granted to change the use from a residence to a commercial business in 1992 (SDR92-02), however, the conditions were not met and the approval expired. The site, however, has been used as a business since that time. Based on notes in the computer, enforcement action was taken. This application will bring the property into compliance. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the southeast corner of SW Baylor and SW 67th. The site is bordered on all sides by property zoned Mixed Use Employment (MUE). The property to the east and south is developed with existing commercial businesses. The properties to the north and west are separated by streets and developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site currently has an existing structure that was converted from a residence to a commercial business. The proposal will remove the existing structure and construct a new 2,994 square foot office building with associated warehousing. The property is located at 11670 SW 67 Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. The applicant has submitted a service provider letter from USA indicating there are no sensitive land areas on the site. SECTION IV. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Tigard Triangle Design Standards Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening B. Additional Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping_and Screening) 18.755 Mixed SolidlNaste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance.) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 4 OF 23 SECTION V. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS: Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting,the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be granted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standard(s) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not significantly detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. The proposal meets the Design option because the property is abutting 2 streets and is not more than 100 feet along either frontage. FINDING: Because the proposal meets the design option, the Street Connectivity Standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 5 OF 23 Cite Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials and the street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Neither SW Baylor nor SW 67th Avenue is a Major or Minor Arterial, therefore, this standard does not apply. Building setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 11/2 feet from the property line fronting SW 67th Avenue and 6 feet from the property line fronting SW Baylor, therefore, this standard is met. Front yard setback design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets. Hard- surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The landscape plan indicates that a combination of landscaping and a concrete walk will be located between the building and the public street. Landscaping and walkways will be discussed further in this decision. Walkway connection to building entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plans show a 6-foot-wide sidewalk will be provided from the main entrance to SW 67t Avenue. Parking location and landscape design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. The site is on a corner lot. The building is oriented at the corner with parking to the side and rear of the building, therefore, this standard has been met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Site Design Standards have been met. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) are satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 6 OF 23 Ground floor windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The round floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the round floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. The 67th Avenue frontage meets this standard by providing 126 square feet of window area where 123 square feet of window area is required. The SW Baylor frontage does not meet this standard, however, because 270 square feet of window area is required whereas only 204 square feet is provided. The window area is measured from 3 feet above grade to 9 feet above grade. Due to the sloping topography, staff took the straight line measurement instead of requiring the window area to follow the lines of the slope. Building facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The west elevation is not greater than 50 feet in length. The north elevation is greater than 50 feet but a covered entry with pillars is provided which breaks up the line of the building, thus meeting this standard. Weather protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. The plans provide for a canopy at both the north and south entrances to the building. Building materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be wood with brick veneer on the lower level. The proposed building materials meet this standard. Roofs and roof lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Roof-mounted equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 7 OF 23 No roof mounted equipment is shown on the plans or anticipated due to the type of roof proposed. The narrative indicates that all mechanical devices will be located inside the attic space. FINDING: Based on the above analysis, all of the Tigard Triangle Building Design Standards have not been fully met, however, if the condition below is met, the standards will be fully met. CONDITION: Submit a revised elevations plan that shows the 50% window requirement will be met. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant's plans show a proposed wall sign which meets the standards listed above. The permitting of signs, however, is done through a separate process administered by the City of Tigard Development Services Technicians. Full compliance with sign standards will be reviewed at that time. A sign permit must be obtained for ANY sign located on the property. FINDING: Because compliance with sign codes will be required when a sign permit is applied for, these standards have been satisfied. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 3'/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. The proposal does not abut a major or minor arterial, therefore, the L-1 standards do not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 8 OF 23 L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. Because the site is on a local street, the L-2 landscape standards defer to Section 18.745. Compliance with Landscaping and Screening standards is discussed further in this decision. FINDING: Because the landscape standards of Section 18.745 are required in-lieu of the L-1 or L-2 landscape standards and because the landscape standards of Section 18.745 are discussed further in this decision, the landscaping and screening standards of the TTDS have been satisfied. B. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access. Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The plans submitted by the applicant indicate that a walkway will be provided from the street to the north and south building entrances. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The walkways will not cross the access drive or parking lot, therefore, this standard does not apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. While it appears that the walkways will be concrete, staff can not confirm this from the plans provided. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 9 OF 23 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has 1 point of access into the parking lot that provides 25 feet of pavement. The access is 30 feet wide at the site entrance. • FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff can not confirm that the access and egress standards have been satisfied. If the applicant submits a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick, the access, egress and circulation standards will be fully met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, stone or brick. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The applicant has provided a plan that shoves 2 Flowering Dogwood street trees will be provided along the SW Baylor and the SW 67 Street frontage. The Western Garden Book Indicates that this type of tree is broad spreading and can grow to 20 feet in height. A tree less than 25 feet is considered a small stature tree which requires spacing no further than 15 feet apart. The TTDS states that street trees along local streets shall be broad spreading and spaced no more than 22 feet on center. After taking into consideration vision clearance needs, it appears that 1 more tree can be installed along SW 67 and 3 more trees can be installed along SW Baylor. • Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The property to the south and east are adjacent to the subject site but developed with commercial businesses. The properties to the north and west are separated by a street, therefore, no buffer is required. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Most of the parking lot is below adjacent properties, separated by,a retaining wall. The parking is not visible from SW Baylor. The parking along the SW 67th Street frontage will be screened by Emerald Gaiety Euonymus and Knnikinnick. Because only 7 spaces are proposed and required, only one parking lot tree is required. The plan provides for 5 trees around the parking lot. Four of the proposed trees are extra and mitigation eligible. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 10 OF 23 Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; All equipment is proposed to be located in the attic space, therefore, this standard is satisfied. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans do not show service facilities. The narrative indicates that trash will be stored inside and presumably brought out to the curb on garbage day. This is discussed further in this decision. Assuming this method of disposal is acceptable, this standard is met because no trash facilities will be stored outside. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Submit a revised plan that provides one more tree along SW 67th (for a total of 3) and 3 more trees along SW Baylor (for a total of 5) spaced no more than 15 feet apart, or revise the proposed trees to be a large stature tree. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant's narrative indicates that trash will be stored inside. Staff is assuming that the proposal is to store trash and recyclables inside and bring them out to the curb on trash days. The applicant has not, however, provided any information for staff to confirm that one of the four compliance methods will be met. The applicant has also not provided written sign-off that the location of the proposed trash pick up will be accessible to their trucks. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas . can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 11 OF 23 The applicant is conditioned to submit plans that show the location of the proposed refuse container. In order to insure that the refuse container is in a location accessible to collectors, the applicant must submit written sign-off from the trash hauler that the proposed locations are sufficient to meet their needs. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. If the enclosure must be outside (due to the size and volume of trash anticipated) The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclables standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITIONS: Submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their needs Submit details (size, location, etc) of the refuse container or storage location for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. If the location is to be outside of the proposed building, the enclosure must be screened in accordance with the landscaping standards of Section 18.745.050.E.4. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The plans do not provide for or require more than 20 parking spaces, therefore, carpool/vanpool parking is not required. Disabled-accessible parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled ersons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is providing 7 parking spaces, therefore, 1 van accessible (9 feet wide with an 8-foot aisle)ADA handicap space is required. The applicant's plans show the ADA space will be 9 feet wide with an 8 foot aisle, therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 12 OF 23 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The driveway and parking will be asphalted in accordance with the requirements. The number and size of the access drives is regulated by the standards specified in Section 18.705.030 and has been discussed previously in this decision. Vision clearance will be addressed further in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision and none is proposed through the parking lot. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. The interior drives are two-way and do not require additional markings. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The plans do not provide wheel stops where the parking is adjacent to the landscaping. In order to meet this standard, the applicant must submit a revised plan that provides wheel stops where the parking is adjacent to landscaping. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate the standard parking spaces will be 8.5 feet by 18.5 feet. The access aisle will be 24 feet wide, thus satisfying the criteria. No compact spaces are proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 13 OF 23 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The plans do not indicate that a bicycle rack will be provided. A condition is necessary for the applicant to submit plans that show a bicycle rack will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. • Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle arking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for General Office, .5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and for Warehouse uses, .1 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, therefore, 2 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. The applicant's plan does not show bicycle parking spaces will be provided, therefore, a condition of approval is necessary. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for General Office Uses is 2.7 spaces per 1000 square feet and the maximum is 3.4 spaces per 1000 square feet. The minimum parking for warehouse uses is .5 spaces per 1000 square feet and the maximum is .8 spaces per 1000 square feet. The applicant is, therefore, required to provide a minimum of 6.3 parking spaces which is rounded up according to the Code (Section 18.765.070.C.1) and a maximum of 8.04 (9). The plans provide 7 parking spaces, therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 14 OF 23 Off-street loading spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The building is less than 10,000 square feet, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be installed where the parking spaces abut landscaping or walkways. • Submit a revised plan that shows a bicycle rack, accommodating 2 bicycle parking spaces will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. • Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted an arborist report that indicates there are 3 trees on site greater than 12 inches in diameter. The total inches of these 3 trees is 70 inches. The applicant will be removing all of the existing trees on-site, therefore, 100% mitigation is required. The applicant will be providing.16 inches on-site by providing additional trees and over-sizing required trees. The remaining inches will be mitigated via the fee-in-lieu. The applicant must pay the fee in-lieu prior to construction and submit a bond or irrevocably letter of credit for the on-site mitigation inches. FINDING: Because the applicant has not actually paid the fee in-lieu and mitigated the required inches, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Prior to issuance of building permits, pay the tree mitigation fee in-lieu for 54 inches. The fee in-lieu cost is based on an estimate of the cost to purchase and plant the same number of inches on-site. Mitigation is based on a 2-inch tree or larger. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 15 OF 23 Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The landscape plan submitted shows no trees or shrubs over 3 feet in height will be located within the vision clearance triangle areas on both sides of the driveway. Because the Tigard Triangle Design Standards supercede other standards of the development code, the vision clearance standards are not applicable at the lot corner due to the building location requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. B. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The building is located on the site in accordance with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. Thebuilding location is at the corner, thus providing adequate light and air circulation for neighboring properties. Fire fighting considerations have been made by the Building Division, however, they have not provided comments that the plans do not satisfy the fire code requirements. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 16 OF 23 Crime Prevention and Safety: A. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; B. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; C. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; D. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and E. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a-height ht so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the parking lot and the street. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and indicated that they do not have any objections to the plan as proposed. FINDING: Because the Police Department has indicated that the lighting plan and site layout is adequate, the Crime Prevention and Safety standards are met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development pro osal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area• and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on SW Baylor and SW 67th which are not on Tri-met transit routes, therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, this standard is satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or his title, e.g. Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing building and construct new office/warehouse building. The zone is MUE, which allows office uses and warehousing that is associated with another permitted use. The warehouse use is less than 50% of the proposed office use, thus meeting the criteria. Dimensional Requirements: The following table compares the dimensional requirements with the proposed requirements. As can be seen from the table below, the proposal fully complies. STANDARD MUE ZONE PROPOSED Minimum Lot Size None 7,500 sq. ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. >50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard Oft. 6 ft. - Side facing street on corner & through lots [1] 0 ft. 1.5 ft - Side yard 0/20 ft. [3] 1.5 ft. - Rear yard 0/20 ft. [3] 61 ft. Maximum Height 45 ft. 29 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85% 84% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 16% Maximum Floor Area Ratio 40% 39% NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 17 OF 23 [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the MUE zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the provisions of the underlying zone are met. C. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (18.810) Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a local service street to have a 60 right-of-way width and 34-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street, both of which are classified as local service streets in the Tigard Triangle Design Standards (TTDS). At present, there is approximately 60 feet of ROW on both streets, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. No additional dedications along the frontages are needed, with the exception of the northwest corner of the site. A ROW radius is necessary at the intersection of the two streets. A 25-foot ROW radius is needed at intersections of two local service streets. Therefore, the applicant should dedicate enough of a ROW radius to provide for a City standard wheel chair ramp at the corner within the ROW prior to construction. The applicant's plans do not show this dedication and the narrative does not mention it. SW 67th Avenue is currently paved, but is not fully improved to meet the TTDS. The applicant's plans indicate that they will mitigate their impact on this roadway by constructing a half-street improvement adjacent to their frontage. SW Baylor Street is currently improved with curb and sidewalk. The only improvements needed are street trees. The applicant's landscape plan shows that they will plant street trees along the Baylor Street frontage. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. A sidewalk exists along the frontage cf SW Baylor Street, and one will be installed by the applicant along the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 18 OF 23 Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The nearest public sanitary sewer line to this site is ash 8-inch line in SW Baylor Street, with a manhole located in the intersection with SW 67 Avenue. The other sewer line is located in SW 67 Avenue, with the last manhole located south of this site approximately 130 feet south of this site. The applicant's engineer discovered that the existing building on this site is served from a private sewer line that was extended diagonally across this site from the manhole in SW 67t Avenue/SW Baylor Street. In addition, they found that the property to the east is also connected to their onsite private sanitary sewer line. No records were found to indicate whether or not the adjacent property owner obtained permits for this connection, or whether or not they obtained approval from the prior property owner of this site to make that connection. With the advent of this new building proposal, the diagonal sewer line across this site must be removed. In order to maintain sewer service or the adjacent parcel to the east, Staff worked with the applicant's engineer toward a solution. The solution is that the applicant will extend a new 6-inch public sewer line from the sewer manhole south of this site in SW 67 Avenue. The new 6-inch line will be extended in a northeasterly direction to a point along the southwest corner of this site where a cleanout will be installed. From the cleanout, a revised sewer service line will be installed to intercept the existing service line that feeds the adjacent parcel to the east. Staff has reviewed the proposed plan and supports the layout. A public improvement permit will be required for the work in the ROW, and a plumbing permit will be required for any sewer work on the private properties. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). This plan appears to accommodate any upstream storm water runoff. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. Onsite detention is also not required if the net increase in impervious surfaces is less than 5,000 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 19 OF 23 The applicant's plan indicates that the surface water runoff from this site will be directed toward the southwest gorner of the site where it will be discharged into the existing roadside ditch in SW 67 Avenue. The net increase in impervious area on this site is approximately 5,295 square feet. The increase is slightly over the 5,000 square foot threshold that Staff normally uses in determining if onsite detention is required. In this case, there does not appear to be a downstream storm drainage problem, and due to the small size of this site, Staff recommends that an onsite detention facility not be required. The Building Division raised a concern with the proposed French drain to be located at the foot of the slope adjacent to SW Baylor Street. The French drain was proposed in order to prevent surface water runoff from the slope from flowing across the applicant's sidewalk. Staff, including the Building Division, met with the applicant's engineer and it was agreed that the applicant would install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of the applicant's sidewalk, rather than a French drain. In addition, the applicant will install an 18-inch river rock strip on the uphill side of the strip drain to help keep the strip drain clean of debris. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. This project site does not abut a bikeway identified on the pedestrian/bikeway plan, therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in- lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontages of SW 67th Avenue and SV�I Baylor Street. However, the services to this site will come from the lines along SW 67' Avenue; therefore, this code provision will only apply to the frontage of SW 67 Avenue. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 100 lineal feet; therefore, the fee would be $2,750.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 20 OF 23 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is served from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing public water lines in the adjacent streets, and the applicant's plans indicate that they intend to utilize the existing water service for the site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's engineer provided a letter requesting a fee in-lieu of water quality facility be allowed on this project. The engineer points out that due to the building location standard of the TTDS, their driveway must be located near the south end of the frontage on SW 67t Avenue. The slope of the site near the southwest corner of the site are significant, and conflict with the required slopes of the new driveway. The topographic constraints prevent the installation of an effective facility that can treat all of the runoff from the site. In addition, this site is only 7,500 square feet in size, and there is a challenge for the applicant to meet the required floor area ratio, landscape areas and parking areas required by the TTDS. In summary, Staff supports payment of the fee in-lieu on this project. It is estimated that the net increase in impervious area is approximately 5,295 square feet. Based upon the current SDC for water quality of $210.00 per 2,640 sf of impervious area, the fee will be approximately $421.00. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface • water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan will be required to be submitted to the Building Division for review prior to construction. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. D. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact: the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 21 OF 23 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the develo ment. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval • requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real roperty% the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an im act study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County pTraffic Impact Fee ( I II-) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $9,726 based on the use proposed (does not include any credits for the existing building). Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $30,393 ($9,726 divided by 32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this protect on the transportation system i%$20,667. The applicant has proposed to construct half street improvements along SW 67 since this is the frontage they are obtaining access from. In addition condition of approval to dedicate right-of-way at the intersection of SW Baylor and SW 67 to provide a City standard wheel chair ram at the corner has been imposed. The cost of the dedication is expected to be minimal 10 at the most based on Piper p s are foot). The cost of half street improvements along W 67 is expected to be $20,000 (100 feet x $200 per linear foot), thus it is roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. In any event, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Not happy with the french drain. What is the potential for offsetting flow entrapment of run-off from the west? What if any, maintenance agreements will they provide? Are they willing to save and hold harmless the City if overflow causes damage to the building? Staff Response: Engineering, Building and Planning staff met with the applicant's engineer to discuss these concerns. Details of necessary changes is discussed under the Street and Utility Improvement section o this decision. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: Although this is outside ofth our Water Service Area, we do have a 12-inch transmission main located within SW 67 Avenue. Also,.we have two (2), 12-inch mains located within SW Baylor Street. Water service to be provided by TVWD. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: I would like to see them try to save the 24" Oak tree located adjacent to the driveway entrance and landscape area. It will take 50 years for their replacement trees to reach that size. It would seem the driveway and parking area could be reconfigured to save the tree with no adverse impact on the project and perhaps save some mitigation fees. Staff Response: The location of the existing tree is too close to the driveway. The construction of the driveway would severely damage the tree roots. The driveway width is the minimum needed and can not be reduced in size to avoid damaging the tree. The City of Tigard Police Department and the City of Tigard Long Range Planning Division have reviewed the application and have not provided comments or objections. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008-SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 22 OF 23 SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed the proposal and provided comments which were incorporated in to the-body of this decision. A complete copy of the comments are a part of the file and are available for review. They also indicated that a Sensitive area exists on site, however, a service provider letter was provided by USA prior to the application being deemed complete that verifies there is no sensitive area on-site. Tualatin Valley Water District, TCI Cable, PGE, GTE, US West, and NW Natural Gas have all reviewed the proposal and offered no comments or objections. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X o Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 6, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 21, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appteat The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community"Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice ofAppeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JUNE 20, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. 51X June 6. 2000 PREP ED BY: Juli owell Hajduk DATE Associate Planner n ',.� June 6. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be e sdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\julia\sdr\Source One.doc.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00008—SOURCE ONE NETWORK PAGE 23 OF 23 1 Al CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,,u'.';, COY OP TIGARD ■ SW 67TH AVENUE -- --- - -- pccMCRLMc fS e . w e •• • • \ . ° • •• p OY • . - — a 00.00-F 100^10.0.02 .1,_ 1 � • N I e --.----- ,n CJ s; o MI Io cn I qa a e a u SI CI ; I D f 1IS �L�N XI 25 00' o A 00 900 F100' Ill _,.___---_. 33 00 __ - �i 00' ° '--1 I w I 0 ° I M 13 b `, 6915U —� \l _ .,' - -- a ' ri\I ° O U O ,`ImIImIIm1m11m 1 ammIcoI1m11m11_U11lIImIImIIm S 00•00'00E 100.00' ° n 600' 1 ■1 1 n CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-00008 SITE PLAIkil N (Map is not to scale) SOURCE ONE NETWORK I I _CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM i -- ______ VICINITY MAP SDR2000-00008 SOURCE ONE •TLAN_ A ST 4 NETWORK (SITE w ST ¢ �J 1 B 1 AYLOR 1 .>:c I N 1 Lir- D Q G J ' I m cn CLINTON ST Q • C , v� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet I— W CO 1'=296 feel • AI o ,4,111 Ill City of Tigard 1 DARTMOUTHST Information on thus map a for general location only and should be vented vnth the Development Services Dlvlmon 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Tlgard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http llwvvw cl,llgard or as — Community Development Plot date.May 2,2000,C.VnaglcWIAGIC03 APR Philip and Rebecca Goold "EXHIBIT B" 11670 SW 67th Avenue SDR2000-00008 Tigard OR 97223 SOURCE ONE NETWORK Laurie Lamoreaux CIDA, Inc. 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Portland OR 97201 . I . A, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING V11III' CITY OF TIDARD Community(Development shaping Better Community STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of?igard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check App opnate Box(s)Below) • ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00008/SOURCE ONE NETWORK ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: LD / ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:Ci I ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: rO. I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng.if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, marked Eulllblt "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Ell Iblt' ",on lune 6,2000,and depo ited i the United States Mail on lune 6,2000, postage prepaid. 7 uie.4 � "Qep- ed N• Ice) Subscribed and sworn/affirme• before me on the 1 c day of jit.(y , 2000. M OFFICIAL SEAL ilri .; SHERMAN S.CAS PER " COMM SSION I■?_739 MY COMMISSION PIRE: Y l i,2 003 / l_, I Ti l I I ` I ' My Commission Expires: Pit y /3. 2o 03 F.X141.B1T NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-000081�, CITY OF TIOARD Community(Development SOURCE ONE NETWORK ShapingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 8/22/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. APPLICANT/ Philip and Rebecca Goold APPLICANT'S Laurie Lamoreaux OWNER: 11670 SW 67th REP.: CIDA, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., #200 Portland, OR 97201 • LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE; Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION _ Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or - copies-can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at-the - time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 6, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 21, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JUNE 20, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Julia Powell Hajduk at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A SW 67"'AVENUE IK a n,. A 1 / 1= •1. E K L s , _.:1 , Ti, I: ., 8'.. ' . LJL 'mm d I,wl '� CITY OF TIGARD T —=SDR=00c-00008=--s SITE PLAN Pi (Map's not to scale) SOURCE ONE NETWORK I / VICINITY MAP 1 SDR2000-00008 1 . SOURCE ONE – ST NETWORK - _ATLANTA i— :T/(11 I I I I I__J [ lay I— I SBA — S I I I 110 I I t f I I �11 I I �I I I�1 Li1 I I H I �nJ I 1- __---- W I / ST r– N Q f ) ► 1 Ii1 '- I City of T■gard DARTMOUTH ST I 1 I I --> "' '� I � I I I I I I 1 —---'— --aw'aate wr3 zow E�mopKVU.cCoiA6R Wmuny Devabp... 1965 • JOSel SW' SSWppd ()A?J3ANIS tS136DA-00101 1S136DA-02401 EXHIBIT B OREGON STATE OF PUBLIC TIGARD CITY OF 11410 SW 68TH PKWY 13125 SW HALL TIGARD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136D0-00100 1S DD-00200 GREEN JOSEPH W GREE OS PO BOX 759 PO B PORTLAND,OR 97207 TLAND,OR 97207 1 S 136DD-00301 1 60D-00400 ' PETERS ALAN CRAIG PETE A CRAIG 6430 SW ROUNDTREE CT 6430 NDTREE CT PORTLAND,OR 97219 RTLAND,0 97219 1S136D0-00500 1S136DD-00600 PETERS PHILLIP M& TIGARD WATER DISTRICT THE 6430 SW ROUNDTREE • . 13125 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND.OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-00700 1S1360D-00800 mERCER ROSS L&VICKI L FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH 11535 SW 67TH 11585 SW 67TH TIGARD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1&136DD-00801 1 S 136DD-00900 ME-. R R• . L&VICKI L VINCENT BRADFORD 11535 • TH 6830 SW HAINES RD T e•RD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 1360D-01000 1 S136DD-01100 JOHNSEN BRAD&JAURA RHEE PYUNG NAI&SOO NAM PO BOX 762 11570 SW 69TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-01200 1 36DD-01300 t.1ATHEWS SEAN A MAR' ORD • TR& 3855 SW LAKE GROVE#17 20385 S =`•NES FERRY RD LAKE OSWEGO.OR 97035 - •d'TIN,OR • 1 S 1360D-01400 1 S 136DD-02600 MARRS CORDELIA TR& SMITH DEAN W& 20385 SW BOONES FERRY RD 17880 SARAH HILL LN TUALATIN.OR 97062 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 1 S 13600-02700 1S136DD-02800 t.1ILLER LAVIDA E MOORE GLENN L AND SHARON L 6870 SW BAYLOR ST 11710 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 :9 1j ioj aaeidwal as wls• �� ;•30-1 ,1;00u:_, 1965 Jase- sir ssaippv ,i1)AU3AV rd 1 S 13600-02890 1 S 13600-02900 • M E GL AND SHARON L .ROD RD C& 11710 TH AVE 2413 R ON DR ARD,OR 9 W UNN,OR t S13600-03000 1 6DD-030 ROOT GORDON C& ROO ON C& 2413 REMINGTON DR 241 ON DR WEST LINN.OR 97068 ST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 136DD-03200 1S1 0D-03290 LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS LARS IRV UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST 555 CH OWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 ERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 1360D-03300 1S 6DD-03300 HUG RICK L&JANETTE HUG K ANETTE 1152 SW TROON 1152 ONE LAKE OSWEGO.OR 97034 OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S DD-03301 1S136DD-03400 HUG R JANETTE LAR'• -VI = JENNIE E TRS 1152 ON 555 CHE "TOWN ST E OSWEGO,OR 97034 G• RSBUR , D 20878 1 S 136DD-034 1S136DD-03403 LA ON I ING/JENNIE E TRS LARSON DIANE L NOW BALDWIN 555 RTOWN ST 3422 241ST AVE SE ITHERSBU MD 20878 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 1 S 1360D-0 .10 1513600-03600 LA• •• • RVING UJENNIE E TRS LARSON JUDY LORRAINE . • TERTOWN ST 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSB I'G.MD 20878 GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 1St 36D0-03700 1 S 136DD-03800 •-SON IRV •G UJENNIE E TRS CASEY EDWARD L JR& 555 k - RTOWN ST PO BOX 1898 G• BURG.MD 20878 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1 S 136DD-03900 1 S 136DD-04000 GOOLD PHILIP A&REBECCA J MCNEILL RANDY 11670 SW 67TH AVE 11700 SW 67TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-04100 1 DD-0530 LEISER ANNE TRUSTEE LARSO ING UJENNIE E TRS 6009 SW PENDLETON CT 555 ESTE N ST PORTLAND.OR 97221 AITHERSBURG,MD 20878 )191,5 iol aleidwal asn 1,4151,04S p3aJ L;;OOl:;, I96S • - case" • , • • s,- 'ei ssaippy •®A?JBAV '. • 1S136DD-05400 . LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 S1E310r, 2300,24D,2500,2600,2700,8500 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD. MILWAUKIE OR 97222-7312 • ®19iS iOj apidwai as fl Wislaays paaj yloows Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 1 1285 SW 18th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91223 Sue Rorman 1 1250 SW 82"d Avenue I:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 12-Apr-00 Tigard, OR 91223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 91223 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109d'Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIOARD Community(Development Sltapingl7 Better Community STATE O'F'O EGOW ) County of-Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, (Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of'riigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: Pled,Apptopnate Box(s)Bel3.) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2000-00008/SOURCE ONE NETWORK ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: Ci l ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:j ( ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heanngs) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/14nd of Notice) FOR: YL (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Heating,if applicable) • A co• .f the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, m- ked ibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked hiblt": ',on Ma 2 000 a'' •-•osi • in the nited States Mail on May 2,2000, postage prepaid. /iii v MA: ..i' (�- so. - ''irdN• Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of ? /1 , 2000. "1: OFFICIAL SEAL SKERMAN S.CASPER I I I I ' I NOTARY PUBIC OREGON My Commission Expires:I/ /1 20 MY COMMISSION E P RES MAY 13 2003 V • EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENS. _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION • ►► 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 2, 2000 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00008 FILE NAME: SOURCE ONE NETWORK PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67thAvenue; WCTM 1S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 16. 2000. All comments should be directed to Julia Powell Hajduk. Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 1. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addres. .e relevant approval criteria with cient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City • ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." 1 1________ _-I ...o.CITY Y....''CARD - I VICINITY MAP SDR2000-00008 / - SOURCE ONE ATLANTA ST NETWORK i SITE II 1 Lui=1 1 SU Li ¢ L • BAY OR w w 1 I ----r-1 {--- ;---1 I I 1 ---.. I 1 i i I I / ...,_, ST I- 1 N CLINTO __� �. __ `� CC o KO mu 303 r. n .m n 0~0 I n we w. ! I1 ' 47I h ... I Z I I --1 C.ry of Tigard . DARTMOUTH ST I ...:.�w.a.. 11 I I I I I I " o�a''" r I �in...o.o.ma.. Y ;3•6, • Jase- sage, ssaJPPb A?J3i�fd V�, EXHIBIT B S 1 36[).4-00101 1S136DA-02401 OREGON STATE OF PUBLIC TIGARD CITY OF 11410 SW 68TH PKWY 13125 SW HALL riGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S13600-00100 1 S DD-00200 GREEN JOSEPH W GREE OS PO BOX 759 PO B PORTLAND,OR 97207 TLAND,OR 97207 1 S 13600-00301 1 6DD-00400 PETERS ALAN CRAIG PETE A CRAIG 6430 SW ROUNDTREE CT 6430 NDTREE CT PORTLAND,OR 97219 RTLAND,0 97219 1 S 136DD-00500 1 S136DD-00600 PETERS PHILLIP M& TIGARD WATER DISTRICT THE 6430 SW ROUNDTREE 13125 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND. OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S13600-00700 1 S136DD-00800 t.1ERCER ROSS L&VICKI L FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH 11535 SW 67TH 11585 SW 67TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 i 8136DD-00801 1 S136DD-00900 ME'. R R• . L&VICKI L VINCENT BRADFORD 11535 - TH 6830 SW HAINES RD e RD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-01000 1S136DD-01100 JOHNSEN BRAD&JAURA RHEE PYUNG NAI&SOO NAM PO BOX 762 11570 SW 69TH AVE BEAVERTON, OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-01200 1 3600-01300 t.1ATHEWS SEAN A MAR ORD TR& 3855 SW LAKE GROVE#17 20385 S NES FERRY RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIN,OR 1S 136DD-01400 1S13600-02600 t.1ARRS CORDELIA TR& SMITH DEAN W& 20385 SW BOONES FERRY RD 17880 SARAH HILL LN TUALATIN. OR 97062 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 is 136DD-02700 1 S136DD-02800 MILLER LAVIDA E MOORE GLENN L AND SHARON L 6870 SW BAYLOR ST 11710 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 :::9t S JoJ aleidwal asn wls;:;,.,y 5 paad 1965 Jasei spa el ssaippi •,hJ:Ll3AV EroViii 1 S 136DD-02890 1S13600-02900 M0•e E GL • • AND SHARON L ROO RD C& 11710 -•TH AVE 2413 R ON DR -ARD,OR 9 • W LINN,OR is 136DD-03000 1 6DD-030 ROOT GORDON C& ROO ON C& 2413 REMINGTON DR 241 ON DR WEST LINN,OR 97068 ST LINN,OR 97068 1S136DD-03200 1S1 DD-03290 LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS LARS IRV UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST 555 CH OWN ST GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 ERSBURG,MD 20878 is 136DD-03300 1S 6DD-03300 HUG RICK L&JANETTE HUG K ANETTE 1152 SW TROON 1152 ON LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 OSWEGO,OR 97034 1 s DD-03301 1 S 136DD-03400 HUG R JANETTE LAIR'• -VI ! JENNIE E TRS 1152 ON 555 CHE 'TOWN ST E OSWEGO,OR 97034 G• RSBUR , •D 20878 1 S136DD-034 1S136DD-03403 LA ON I ING/JENNIE E TRS _ LARSON DIANE L NOW BALDWIN 555 RTOWN ST 3422 241ST AVE SE ITHERSBU MD 20878 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 1 S 136DD-0 0 1 S136DD-03600 LA RVING UJENNIE E TRS LARSON JUDY LORRAINE g. TERTOWN ST 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSB G. MD 20878 GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 136DD-03700 1S136DD-03800 ••SON IRV •G UJENNIE E TRS CASEY EDWARD L JR& 555 . RTOWN ST PO BOX 1898 G' ; BURG, MD 20878 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1 S 1 36DD-03900 1S136DD-04000 GOOLD PHILIP A&REBECCA J MCNEILL RANDY 11670 SW 67TH AVE 11700 SW 67TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-04100 1 DD-0530 LEISER ANNE TRUSTEE LARSO ING UJENNIE E TRS 6009 SW PENDLETON CT 555 STE N ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 AITHERSBURG,MD 20878 oI9i5 ioj aleidwalasn wisljaLgS paa3 Lj;oowy „,I96S iasei S ?r'El ssaippv oAa73Aegf11;' 1S136DD-05400 LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 S1E31CC, 2300,2400,2500,2600,2700,8500 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD. MILWAUKIE OR 97222-7312 ®i9LS laj wls;aays paaj wows � ) I I 6( 3 3 3 m GEOGRAPHIC PHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 6( M CITY of TIGARD N N / -� 4 / N AREA NOTIFIED J 7 ______ • \ / (500')Y\/,, -!-!) i \ilk�\ I / a �p // / / f / ---E ' REFOR: :SoSuDrcR e 21 000- ,....J Netw000 8 I, H . Property owner information Is valid for 3 months from / the date printed on this map. i I —.7 r ATLANTA i ST s w. I ©.r... m° I I� HAINES ST �.� Q �_ 0 BAYLOR ST siy s.W GUI ER LAN= .. . .. a .w a �SS 4,1:1 N.... ® l _ - i j > F S W SOUT}MEw . / / ID o/ 200 400 ea) rep ' ®e ea o i Z I \ 1..400 feet rn ST D CLINTON \ I I ir .119:: 3 w �� . 3 a, ;a/ I i�� F City of Tigard . H ,:c, ., 3 m "' Irdam is an tits rreq is fa general bcatlan aiy a I S W KRUSE shadd t valfied with the DBVAopnert Savaes Dmslan. I I RIDGE 0 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 S w DOUGLAS ST. (503)6334171 DARTMOUTH ST I I J I I I I I T .11ww'a a•u' Community Development Plot date:May 2,2000;D:N kagicstuf?MAGICEDTNodbnotil\Magic03.apr w 19•65 • • Jasel sage? ssaippv ca1AJ3AVII 1S136DA-00101 1S136DA-02401 OREGON STATE OF PUBLIC TIGARD CITY OF 11410 SW 68TH PKWY 13125 SW HALL• TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DD-00100 1S DD-00200 GREEN JOSEPH W GREE OS PO BOX 759 PO B PORTLAND,OR 97207 TLAND,OR 97207 1 S 136DD-00301 1 6DD-00400 PETERS ALAN CRAIG PETE A CRAIG 6430 SW ROUNDTREE CT 6430 NDTREE CT PORTLAND,OR 97219 RTLAND,0 97219 1 S 136DD-00500 1 S 136DD-00600 PETERS PHILLIP M& TIGARD WATER DISTRICT THE 6430 SW ROUNDTREE 13125 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-00700 1S13600-00800 r.1ERCER ROSS L&VICKI L FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH 11535 SW 67TH 11585 SW 67TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-00801 1 S 136D0-00900 ME'. R R• . L&VICKI L VINCENT BRADFORD 11535 • = TH 6830 SW HAINES RD T e•RD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 136DD-01000 1S13600-01100 JOHNSEN BRAD&LAURA RHEE PYUNG NAI&SOO NAM PO BOX 762 11570 SW 69TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1360D-01200 1 36DD-01300 MATHEWS SEAN A MAR- ORD • TR& 3855 SW LAKE GROVE#17 20385 S =`•NES FERRY RD LAKE OSWEGO.OR 97035 • 4•TIN,OR • . 1 S 136DD-01 400 1 S 136DD-02600 r.IARRS CORDELIA TR& SMITH DEAN W& 20385 SW BOONES FERRY RD 17880 SARAH HILL LN TUALATIN.OR 97062 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 1 S 1360D-02700 1S136DD-02800 MILLER LAVIDA E MOORE GLENN L AND SHARON L 6370 SW BAYLOR ST 11710 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 :91S 10; ateidwa3 asn wls; :.,i ,.;334 ∎,;oOL:J W,1965 . iasei ssaippv iuA2J3AV 1 136DD-02890 1 S 136DD-02900 • M E GL AND SHARON L .ROD RD C& 11710 TH AVE 2413 R ON DR ARD,OR 9 W LINN,OR 1 S 136DD-03000 1 600-030 ROOT GORDON C& ROO ON C& 2413 REMINGTON DR 241 ON DR WEST LINN,OR 97068 ST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 136DD-03200 1S1 DD-03290 LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS LARS IRV UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST 555 CH OWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 ERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 1360D-03300 1S 60D-03300 HUG RICK L&JANETTE HUG K ANETTE 1 152 SW TROON 1152 ON LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 OSWEGO,OR 97034 t S DD-03301 1S136DD-03400 HUG R JANETTE LAR•• •VI JENNIE E TRS 1152 ON 555 CHE 'TOWN ST E OSWEGO,OR 97034 G• RSBUR , D 20878 1 S 136D0-034 1 S 1360D-03403 LA ON I ING/JENNIE E TRS LARSON DIANE L NOW BALDWIN 555 RTOWN ST 3422 241ST AVE SE ITHERSBU MD 20878 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 1S136D0-0 0 1S136DD-03600 LA RVING UJENNIE E TRS LARSON JUDY LORRAINE TERTOWN ST 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSB G,MD 20878 GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 1360D-03700 1S136DD-03800 •-SON IRV •G UJENNIE E TRS CASEY EDWARD L JR& 555 • RTOWN ST PO BOX 1898 G• BURG,MD 20878 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 151360 D-03900 1 S136D0-04000 GOOLD PHILIP A&REBECCA J MCNEILL RANDY 11670 SW 67TH AVE 11700 SW 67TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S13600-04100 1 00-0530 LEISER ANNE TRUSTEE LARSO ING UJENNIE E TRS 6009 SW PENDLETON CT 555 ESTE N ST PORTLAND.OR 97221 AITHERSBURG,MD 20878 ;,I9t5 Joj aleidwalasn w151,a45 paaj L;;ooL:;, • /96s- . a�s� slagei ssaippv ®AUBAv • igl 1S136DD-05400 • LARSON IRVING LJJENNIE E TRS • 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 S1E31a0, 2300,2400,2500,2 CO,2700,8500 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9002 SE MCLOUGHLIN BLVD. MILWAUKIE OR 97222-7312 ®1915 iajapidwalasn Wls3aagS paaj gloowS APPLICANT MATERIALS 1 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP.HELD WITH: 54 DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): 1 6-1 0 Sw 61 AV e. FOR STAFF USE ONLY 03-ol -SD,e Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): l S 1 w '34) f) Case No.(s): SCR 2.000-00002 T. L. 19 Other Case No.(s): Site Size: )`/S X 100 Receipt No.: c2000(e g_3 Application Accepted By: LSP/-4 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: P\N.V.P 't P.Q cO (->ooki Date: 3'l S-Zo.o Address: i t 61 t Sw &,'1"-' Phone: 62-4-CA)z. City: -11 Zip: 77-2-3 Date-Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: S Alt,E - Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: City: • Zip: CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession _ Rev.11/26/98 iAcurpin\masterstsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY - a Application Form [Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Er Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): I2 IN ' Site/Plot Plan S O R rt e P\1 cok i (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Ke 0-f-r,1.�- 61 A ,p;�R_ Er Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") GA_ P. New L`I(0 t S . , r Q Applicant's Statement _ (#of copies based on pre-app check list) W a -e. �w 1 a-t_12_ k 1 e c s c�, �(c'- C_Construction Cost Estimate Cam,. �Le [VUSA Sewer Use Information Card 4-e") A N`� (Distributed/completed at application submittal) �},c� Er2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes �iling Fee (Under$100.000) $ 800.00 ($100.000-$999,999) $1,600.00 • ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 Need OSA /cW.Lr I List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: NO/0 APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this )5-1—"L day of CL ,Aaj' 2oov Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:03/15/2000 14:57 User: KRISTIE Station: 02 Operator: KJP Rcpt No: 0000683 Date: 03/15/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 1,600.00 Name: SOURCE ONE NETWORK INC Cash: 0.00 Address: SW 72ND AV\- old gc(d(`S‘ Check: 1,600.00 PORTLAND, OR 9.72T4 Naw gddreSS is N/A : 0.00 /1670 31.167J-. Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 1,600.00 • • CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping i4 Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION : . , 120 DAYS=08/22/2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00008 FILE TITLE: SOURCE ONE NETWORK APPLICANT/ Philip and Rebecca Goold APPLICANT'S Laurie Lamoreaux OWNER: 11670 SW 67th REP.: CIDA, Inc. Tigard, OR 97223 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 PHONE: (503) 624-6020 (503) 226-1285 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting site development approval to construct a new 2,960 square foot office/warehouse building with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 11670 SW 67th Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DD, Tax Lot 03900. ZONE: MUE. Mixed Use Employment. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is to provide a wide range of uses including major retail goods and services, business/professional offices, civic uses and housing. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: May2,2000 DUE: May16,2000 © STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: JUNE 1,2000 - ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 Cl PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 ❑ CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION E3 VICINITY MAP p NARRATIVE p STORM.WATER CALCULATION p ARCHITECTUAL PLAN p SITE PLAN p LANDSCAPE PLAN p PRE-APPLICATION NOTES p ARBORIST REPORT STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Hajduk. Associate Planner (503) 639-4171 Ext. 407. SDR2000-00008 SOURCE ONE NETWORK LAND USE PROPOSAL PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN ChL,CKLIST Proje,... J •G'-N - FOR Date: 31z1 2o LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS [ OMPLETE ❑INCOMPLETE G ING Existing and proposed contours shown? [� Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes Er No Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES El Right-of-way clearly shown? D^ Centerline of street clearly shown? L� Name of street(s) shown? [ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? -1344 Profiles of proposed streets 01+4 Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? ri ❑ Traffic study required/submitted? • Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? { Check widths proposed on public streets M Are private streets proposed? ▪ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES Er Existing/proposed lines? a Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES [r Existing/proposed lines? [r Existing/proposed fire hydrants? S pRM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES Existing/proposed lines? _ Er Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality.provided? ', ``am cr Water quality facility shown on plan? ) ;1;k-T LK-. 1t�e ue=bT► Fc.. ' . .1D-NA'. does area provided match calculations for size requirement? [J Stubs to adjacent properties required? „ I/. Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:\eng1brianAmasters1public mastersipublic facility plan checklisl.doc 1 RECEIVED CITY OF TIGARD April 10, 2000 OREGON APR 25ZC° Philip Goold �DMNNI� DEVELOPMENT 11670 SW 67th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Incompleteness letter for SDR2000-00008 Dear Mr. Goold: Staff has reviewed your application submittal for the Source One Network office building at 11670 SW 67th Avenue. After a preliminary review of the application materials, staff has determined that your application can not be deemed complete until you have submitted the USA service provider letter. Once this letter is submitted that verifies there are no sensitive site areas on this site or within 200 feet, your application will be deemed complete. Once the application is deemed complete, staff will begin processing the application. The estimated time frame for rendering a decision is 6-8 weeks from the date the decision is deemed complete. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application at (503) 639-4171, extension 407. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:\curpin\julia\sdr\sourceone.doc y �Q rP 1 c: SDR2000-00008 Land use file V S . . 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 P 60A u A f f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY April 24, 2000 Source One Network, Inc. 11670 SW 67th Ave. Portland, OR 97223 Re: 1 S136DD-03900 11670 SW 67th Ave. The Unified Sewerage Agency (Agency) has received your Sensitive Areas Certification Form for the above referenced site. Agency staff has reviewed the Sensitive Areas Certification Form and concurs that the sensitive area found during the pre-screen has been piped. In light of this result, the above referenced project does not need a Service Provider letter as required by Agency Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1. Prior to construction, a Stormwater connection permit for the Agency or its designee it required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3795. Sincerely, -----Mee ---c_-.)-4d 4-1/----- S. Alison Rhea Site Assessment Codrdinator E:\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\1S136DD 3900.doc 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON May 1 , 2000 Philip Goold 11670 SW 67th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Completeness letter for SDR2000-00008 Dear Mr. Goold: Staff has received the additional information submitted for the Source One Network project. Based on this additional information, staff has determined that your application is complete as of April 25, 2000 and scheduled the project for review. The estimated time frame for rendering a decision is 6-8 weeks from the date the decision is deemed complete. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter or your application at (503) 639-4171 , extension 407. Sincerely, ulia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is\curpin\julia\sdr\sourceone acc2.doc c: SDR2000-00008 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) I, P\-,. P l�- C�ootC) , being duly sworn, depose and say that on .Tna as 1 loco , 1� I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) I I CU SW 677f' AJen,ve- ; 90 r.}-I Anicl OR ei1ti.,3 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at IZZI0 SW �a;N Sft�ee+ 1 qizz3 (T;xiesci far-ctr'5ck) , with postage prepaid thereon. P. i=- ,x6 Signature .. (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) 20 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the -24/ /,day of f;,.7 . 4„.T.. OFFICIAL SEAL , 74-two' CAROL L.HAMILTON C, �� � i- r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON �\ � COMMISSION NO.311183 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 1,2002 My Commission Expires: Ai,, / o/ , 2 Co (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) r:s1AtME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant/Owner: Address or General Location of Subject Property: I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): rt:Uog unlpattylma ster s lalfmaJ.mst • SOURCE ONE NETWORK INC. January 25, 2000 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: 1.1670 SW 67th Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Interested Party: • I. Philip A. Goold, the owner of the property located at 11670 SW 67th Avenue. Iivard. Oregon 97223, am considering proposing a 2994 sq. ft. general office use building at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2000 Source One Network, Inc. 11670 SW 67TH Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97223 7:00pm Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-624-6020 if you have any questions. Sincerely, } _ Philip A. Goold President Jasel siagel ssaiPPt1 ktikASAV S 136D A-00101 1S136DA-02401 OREGON STATE OF PUBLIC TIGARD CITY OF 11410 SW 68TH PKWY 13125 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-00100 ;p0.:18 DD-00200 GREENJOSEPH w E OS PO BOX 759 PORTLAND, OR 97207 TLAND,OR 97207 1 S 136DD-00301 1 6DD-00400 PETERS ALAN CRAIG PETE A CRAIG 6430 SW ROUNDTREE CT 6430 NDTREE CT PORTLAND.OR 97219 RTLAND,O\ 97219 1 S 136DD-00500 1 S136DD-00600 PETERS PHILLIP M& TIGARD WATER DISTRICT THE 6430 SW ROUNDTREE ' . 13125 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-00700 1S136DD-00800 MERCER ROSS L&VICKI L FAMILY BAPTIST CHURCH 11535 SW 67TH 11585 SW 67TH TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1. 136DD-00801 1S136DD-00900 ME'. R R• . L&VICKI L VINCENT BRADFORD 11535 • . TH 6830 SW HAINES RD r RD.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 136DD-01000 1S136DD-01100 JOHNSEN BRAD&LAURA RHEE PYUNG NAt&SOO NAM PO BOX 762 11570 SW 69TH AVE BEAVERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-01200 1- 36D0-01300 MATHEWS SEAN A MAR- ORD • TR& 3855 SW LAKE GROVE#17 20385 S =`•NES FERRY RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 • ...TIN,OR • 1S 136DD-01400 1 S136DD-02600 MARRS CORDELIA TR& SMITH DEAN W& 20385 SW BOONES FERRY RD 17880 SARAH HILL LN TUALATIN,OR 97062 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 1S1 36DD-02700 1S136DD-02800 mILLER LAVIDA E MOORE GLENN L AND SHARON L 6870 SW BAYLOR ST 11710 SW 69TH AVE TIGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 _,i9tS i0j aleidwalasn wls; -�;5 caaj 1,;o0LL.2_; 1966 Jasei slum ssaipp �l AV wa t S 1 36DD-02890 1 S136DD-02900 MO..E GL • AND SHARON L ROO RD C& 11710 • -•TH AVE 2413 R ON DR ARD,OR 9 - W LINN,OR t S 136DD-03000 1 600-030 ROOT GORDON C& ROO ON C& 2413 REMINGTON DR 241 ON DR WEST LINN,OR 97068 ST LINN,OR 97068 1 S 136DD-03200 1S1 DD-03290 LARSON IRVING UJENNIE E TRS LARS IRV UJENNIE E TRS 555 CHESTERTOWN ST 555 CH OWN ST GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 ERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 136DD-03300 1S 6DD-03300 HUG RICK L&JANETTE HUG K ANETTE 1152 SW TROON 1152 ON LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 OSWEGO,OR 97034 15 DD-03301 1S136DD-03400 HUG R JANETTE LAR VI JENNIE E TRS 1 152 ON 555 CHE TOWN ST i E OSWEGO,OR 97034 G RSBUR , 0 20878 1 S 136DD-034 1 S136DD-03403 LA ON I ING/JENNIE E TRS LARSON DIANE L NOW BALDWIN 555 RTOWN ST 3422 241ST AVE SE ITHERSBU MD 20878 ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 1S136DD-0 •s0 1S1360D-03600 LA' -• • RVING UJENNIE E TRS LARSON JUDY LORRAINE . • TERTOWN ST 555 CHESTERTOWN ST GAITHERSBI-G,MD 20878 GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 1 S 136DD-03700 1S136DD-03800 •'SON IRV •G UJENNIE E TRS CASEY EDWARD L JR& 555 • RTOWN ST PO BOX 1898 G• BURG, MD 20878 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1 S 136DD-03900 1S136DD-04000 GOOLD PHILIP A&REBECCA J MCNEILL RANDY 11670 SW 67TH AVE 11700 SW 67TH TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136DD-04100 1 DD-0530 LEISER ANNE TRUSTEE LARSO ING UJENNIE E TRS 6009 SW PENDLETON CT 555 STE N ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 AITHERSBURG,MD 20878 olsIts iojaleidwalasn wlslJays paad y;00u::� t96c Jase1 sae, ssai 1$136•1-05400 LARSON • • UJENNIE E TRS 555 C ER • N ST G• ERSBURG, M' -:878 r. ®t9t5 Job aleidwal asn wislaags Paa j yloow,- ('ITV ,1C lir_ Am COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAM çp SUBCOMMITTEES �_;:;. : , sue;:�. : _ - .: `° -flA� S.VGIT-' 4�A�? �ir , : i øôutAG1t..' : •:CE_ NT - A: -- Ed & Fran Egan Naomi Galluoci Sally Christensen . iDebra Seeman 14635 SW Bull Mountain Road 11285 SW 78th Avenue I 15685 SW 76"'Avenue 1372 SW Clearview Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 i Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 ': Earl& Marilyn Elias Sue Rorman i Mary Ann Melvin Mary Skelton 13540 SW Village Glenn Drive 11250 SW 82 Avenue 10395 SW Bonanza Way 10355 SW Walnut Tigard, OR 97223 ,Tigard,OR 97223 i Tigard, OR 97224 - Tigard, OR 97223 ti i, t, c Craig Minor ohn Snyder Stephen Bicker Kathleen Anderson 14210 SW Windsong Court 1100 SW 82'd Avenue i '14235 SW 97th Avenue 12132 SW Lansdowne Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Igard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 ! Tigard,OR 97223 I IN tC ' Paul E Owen Mark Bogert ' 10335 SW Highland Drive 14445 SW 100th Avenue c Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 I ER Beverly Froude Twyla Brady 0 lal SW Bull Mountain Road 9360 SW Edgewood Street z Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97223 14 F Craig Smelter Debra Muir '' 14900 SW 103'd Avenue 15065 SW 79th Avenue i al .c Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 '_'.', . i Joan Best Sue Siebold E 10705 SW Murdock Ln, #F2 15374 SW Thurston Lane [� Tigard,OR 97224 Tigard,OR 97224 'Kathy Palmer Tim Esav 11.-\ ) c%John Tigard House PO Box 23069 14260 SW High Tor Dr. Tigard,OR 97281 Tigard,OR 97224 ft, ;`Jeanette Phel s � t 15305 SW Bull Mountain Road , Ti.ard,OR 97224 A PLEASE NOTE: in addition to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject site, notice of meetings on land use proposals shall be sent to all names on this list. j 1\curpin'masterzvevtcernrJi SW:Ka r m:Itees mst Revlsea 11/O9!99 Neighborhood meeting, February 9th, 2000 — 11670 SW 67th Ave., Tigard, OR 97223 Name & Address Comments /hc/v£// c 1.71 Z3 7-h; +1 ';f\► . r+ %� Zr Prcve - ,.r1--- 4!Avg w,-F1, q( -3 t-mAtAs-- See Pro P;,:-t.- .i ?UK., OL;.ve( 0CCupic& . (I STATE OF OREGON 1 SS AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: County of Wa: >n Philip A. Goold I,Jerry R,�C anlvFi qri D Actor of Assess- Rebecca J. Goold ment andjjaotidn and`'EfC;O,fflio County Clerk for said;toty,ydosi4kreby certify that //6)p7 ,c i e) 7. we— the withj�y(gstrutrtnen ofatdting was;received and re rded!ih`'book,io it"ropoidsyof said county. �r ii't . 4,il,�l r. r� o,N OA'. 9?a 3 y ���-,emu. , z` u.. c��' Until a change is requested all tax , ..A y��`�/; statements shall be sent to the following Jerry R Hanson!Director of address: Assessment'and4'Taxation,Ex- address //K '_ ,f r�• f7' 9'-2. • Doc : 98053623 Rect: 209121 188. 00 /z Qom' 77 9 '.Z2 3 05/21/1998 01: 15:09pm Esciow No: 4200 24885 JG / Order No: 185049 WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM ( (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) 1 ' ROBERT E. CLINE Grantor, conveys and warrants to PHILIP A. GOOLD and REBECCA J. GOOLD, husband and wife T. Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically ',..3 set forth herein: J' Lot 1, 2 and 3, Block 7, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, in the City of Tigard, in the County of 1 Washington and State of Oregon. J This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. ENCUMBRANCES: The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency. (Continued) The true consideration for this conveyance is"$155,000.00 paid to an accommodator pursuant to an w IRC §1031 exchange." J ;=*. Dated S//%;/7 z ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by ord r 7/norpard of directors. obert E. Cline et.* WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX. u • REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER $ /55.00 051211.91 _ v i. FEE PAID DATE STATE OF OREGON, County of C/Q i/r?m 44- )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on N•IL h a / , 19 9.r by This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 by as of A;42-0-2 ....,t44.,-,--.4...- Lary Public for o y commission expires: %/��7_c1z f-c_/ Ra,7., OFFICIAL SEAL JAN GODBEY ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ` " COMMISSION NO.052798 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.14,2000 ' AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE sbc4000-- g WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 (Source,. ONt e4- c k, r,.c> I, a'l't lip 4. Good , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed oerierta oc.C,ce 13 Le Corvsfe,,cla.,J affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 11 610 Sw b,1th Ave, gh T; o t4 cc 9izi.3 , and did on the 14 day of aNuar•y *2000 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a co 1-e C >, . i2v¢vie� application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 11 610 Sw (.712' flue . - CacNer 0 ko?l'I' +' y)os (state location you posted notice on property) er k Jfir-" &) Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Z cJ c c. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the a4/6 day ofh,,ea-zi T9�. (it OFFICIAL SEAL CAROL L. HA ITOM / ,,NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0.311183 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 1,zooz My Commission Expires: 4,,-/ o I 2-002- (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: �TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: I Name of Applicant/Owner. (Address or General Location of Subject Property: L Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I J h:Joginlpatty masterslaffpost.mst I LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S • • • • • • • • . . . . . • Date Received TO: City Of Tigard ATTN: � / 1Qj d k RECEIVED DEPT: JAN 2 4 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •i65�w:i:`7�;���r:'�';:;•.,... .`::,\�<s��;•':"x'¢, , °. ;�; :,�f�'):;i:GF^'yn::i J%5i; ;�cyyi•%':'xbt y;j''/}" .5."'.rc':,,i` ' \ ') .h:<'•Y '.,iCr,..% :vn.Y'F� :^ ::f : .:f„%G:'�"j,.',,;:YvKY":F:$:'J,:):.::.d.. „� Gon'tact.�Name 'f:': " �h r/J;;/+�+<'�a°y • ,i•' 'Fig)',•:' :. .�.,: .2:<io:`. :i.; . Fr.. , .i>•L ,,. ,,Jx.(.1' )' .,,��:•:,:,< 'JF:�4 h�hv,<.: ▪ ; .,. %' '.% • ',� �Pr`,o�,ectNam• 'e. )i+v/•.`}n'W, ,x`!'J •„`y .c.:;.F i ;)¢fin','. '� �'S:'.f,�,•: %;,"'} a i`:::`i ,:.0•i!?`�'., :"' -r'•:/z s' .. y5�!'v'>,.,�¢.c +•y .:!` : S<;;,.▪ ';':; Y.� .., ;,rye;; v LrS�r:'';'/ .'. .q i. 3 ?"Y<•yi ice' ' srr<.>.F:••rFc��y,a?yv:Ac:.;,i),.':t:.t<`<;f$"'<«°?):'.'':;.`%/is'i>!.y,s�.'r'3.,`Y J �,.':%," )q);Z;�i'j;r<i::�m•.%;S I%<':• ; i . `" , 1 '" �,,� nS a� t/�•�} 'i!•%Fi^ r';°': v�Fi:y,,is �•:Ci'"�`' �' :nY,,�+„TxE'':v.�l d��;�•(�<% .'F`?. 5v.:; :�r.�,ti'�',� y4%,k"+,..:.::., :,/}i.; ,r� d;:�: •:u. A; 'yI`,•$%�;,�ry'':>XF`.3.' ,.r�r."''i'-).�xr:ari5`.�';6�`Y, g:;b,'�+ ' �; Yf"i':.:��' xr«�,.:<):F'F s�;5.f f�}°,.:/>,f,�:�,.',:....y.d�.?C N,/r`:7':xr+.i xi,•,f/`i:s%s.,t,,,�;;..,f:,i,i°r••Y x;,h.�.%:r�i;S';', <;<::`�£y�x:<�"s y.:;,. %>h<;:o;;Cf o� c:;f,,.:, FY,,a hb% ✓ , Comments • j6(k): I u ,� ta-eaLe--3_ transmittalform ___ Proposal //V'c&rraL4;Ve SOURCE ONE NETWORK SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NARRATIVE PREPARED BY CIDA, INC. 4445 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 March 13, 2000 This is an application for City of Tigard Site Development Review for a new facility for Source One Network. The property includes tax lot 3900 located at 11670 SW 67th Ave. The existing dwelling will be removed in conjunction with development of approximately 2,994 square feet of office/warehouse space. The site is in the Tigard Triangle and is zoned MUE. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Chapter 1 8.360 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code, requires that new development meet criteria necessary for Site Development Review approval. Each of these criteria is addressed as follows: 1. "Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.800, Street and Utility Standards;" This proposal meets all requirements of this chapter, including sidewalk design, curb, ramp and driveway specifications. The existing driveway location will remain. New connections will be made to public utilities already existing in the public right-of-way, and serving the existing development. 2. "Relationship to the natural and physical environment a. Buildings shall be: (I) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions;" The building and parking lot are designed based on the topography and shape of the site, and the Code standard that required the building to be located at the corner. Trees removed due to construction will be mitigated as required by the Code. \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network-Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 2 (2) "Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding" The site is not located in an area identified as prone to slumping or sliding. (3) "Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and" The new building is located on the site in response to property conditions and Code standards. The new building's proximity to neighboring buildings, as well as its proximity to adjacent streets, allow for adequate light and air circulation. The new parking lot layout provides for a direct on-site fire access route. (4) "Oriented with consideration for sun and wind." The building is located in an area not impacted by significant sun and wind exposure. The building entries and windows are therefore protected from heat and glare by conventional design. b. "Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal." Significant trees removed due to construction include one on-site and three in the right-of-way. They will be mitigated according to the Code standards. 3. "Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (I) Recesses, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions, e.g., decks, patios, entrances, floor area, of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet; and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height." This is an office/warehouse development. This criterion does not apply. 4. "Buffering screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different typos of land uses, for example, between single-family and multi-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer. (I) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier, (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; \\ADMIN\admin\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 3 (3) The direction(s) from which buffenng is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering; and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile." The east and south sides of the site abut office uses, while to the north and west there is a mix of office and residential. There is no need nor Code requirement for buffering. b. "On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: (I) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around." Mechanical devices will be located inside an attic space. Trash will be kept inside the building. 5. "Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses:..." This is an office development. This criterion does not apply. 6. "Private outdoor area: multi-family use:...." This is an office development. This criterion does not apply. 7. "Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use:...." This is an office development. This criterion does not apply. 8. "Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of su f f cient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan." The proposed development is not within a 100-year floodplain. This criterion does not apply. 9. "Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structure and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and" \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Developmel e Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 4 On-site outdoor areas include the parking lot, building entrances and adjacent sidewalk areas. Building entrances are located adjacent to the parking area and street, and are not blocked by walls, landscaping, or other barriers that would diminish visibility for security purposes. b. "These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: (I) A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor, (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign; or (6) Landscaping." Sidewalks are differentiated from other hardscape by a change in hardscape material — concrete sidewalks as opposed to asphalt parking and drive areas. No designated outdoor gathering areas are proposed with this development. On-site landscaping is to enhance the front and side yards of the site and for screening purposes from on-site car lights shining onto adjacent properties. The plant material chosen for screening purposes will be approximately 3 feet high at maturity, high enough to block car lights but not to block visibility and cause a security problem. A retaining wall along the east property lines will also screen parking areas and car lights from adjacent properties. 10. "Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants;" Three of the four sides of the new building are adjacent to parking areas or the street and thus allow for occupants and patrons to maintain view the parking area, as well as the site, at all times. b. "Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others;" This criterion is not applicable. c. "Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic;" The mail box location will be along the curb or as may be determined by the Post Office. \\ADMI N\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp.doc Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 5 d. "The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented toward areas vulnerable to crime; and" On-site lighting levels will be standard for commercial developments, and will be provided by building mounted lighting along the south exterior building wall. e. "Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestnan or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person." The building entries will include pedestrian level lighting in the form of can lights mounted next to each door at 8 feet high on the building. These lights will be used to illuminate the pedestrian entries and walkways. The south building facade will also include a building mounted metal halide type lighting fixture mounted at 18 feet high up the exterior building wall. This will be used to illuminate the parking lot area. I I. "Public transit a. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; b. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: (I) The location of other transit facilities in the area; and (2) The size and type of the proposal. c. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: (I) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters." There is no transit service immediately adjacent to the site. 12. "Landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirement set forth in Chapter 18.100; b. In addition to the open space and recreation areas requirements of subsection 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped." The landscape plan provides 16 percent of the site for landscaping. Screening for parking areas is provided, as well as other standards of Chapter 18.100. \V\DMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 6 13. "Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the enteric) in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan;" Stormwater detention will not be required, since the redevelopment will increase impervious area by less than 5,000 square feet. Existing building: I,20 I sf Existing driveway: 485 sf Existing woodshed: 72 sf Existing sidewalks/patios: 373 sf Total Existing: 2,13 I sf New building footprint: 2,994 sf New parking lot: 3,447 sf New sidewalks: 512 sf Total New Impervious Area: 6,320 sf Net New Impervious Area: 4,189 sf Due to the difficult site grading, a fee in lieu of an on-site stormwater quality facility is proposed (see attached letter). 14. "Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirement set forth in ORS Chapter 447; and" The proposed development provides an ADA compliant walkway from the public right-of-way to the new building. The parking lot provides for one handicap parking space with a van accessible loading area. 15. "All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title; e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 1 8.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 1 8.370." No variances or adjustments are proposed in conjunction with this Site Development application. TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS Because the site is located within the Tigard Triangle, new development is also subject to Tigard Triangle development criteria. Each of these is addressed as follows: 18.620.020 Street Connectivity "All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met....." I. Design Option a. "Local street spacing shall provide street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet." F\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc • Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 7 b. "Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet.." This proposal does not include street design. This criteria is not applicable to this project. 2. Performance Option a. "Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile." b. "The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance." c. "The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance." This proposal does not include street design. This criteria is not applicable to this project. 18.620.30 Site Design Standards "All development must meet the following site design standards....." I. "Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials — Building shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at pubic street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets." The property is not located on either a major or minor arterial. This criterion is not applicable. 2. "Building setback — The minimum building setback from public street right-of-way or dedicated wetland/buffers and other environmental features shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet." The building is setback a maximum 6 feet from nearest rights-of-way. The site is not adjacent to a dedicated wetland or buffer area. 3. "Front yard setback design — Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-I standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials....." There is proposed pedestrian access from the building entrance facing Baylor and from the building entrance nearest 67"'. Landscaping of the front and side yards meets the L I standard and includes a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover. Street trees are included as well as 3 foot high evergreen shrubs along the perimeter of the parking lot. \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 8 4. "Walkway connection to building entrances —A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and public street or access way. This walkway must be at least six feet wide and paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials... " Six foot wide concrete walkways are provided from each entrance to the right-of- way. 5. "Parking location and landscape design — Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street right-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on side, parking is limited to 50%of the street frontage and must be behind a landscape area constructed to an L-I Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-I landscape area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-I Landscape Standard." The front of the building faces Baylor with a parking lot behind. Access to the parking lot is from 67`x. The perimeter of the parking lot is screened by a combination of retaining wall and 3 foot high evergreen shrubs in a 5 foot wide minimum planting strip. 1 8.620.40 Building Design Standards "All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards....." I. "Ground floor windows —All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to I 0 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings.... Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building comer." The building contains more than 50 percent ground floor windows along both street facing facades. The majority of the windows are grouped at the corner intersection, with windows also adjacent to the building entry. 2. "Building facades —Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least I foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or(d) by another design feature that reflects the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building." As noted above, windows and doorways take up more than 50 percent of both street facing facades of the building. Second floor facades are a majority of windows as well. The building is 72 feet long with a recessed entrance portico approximately in the middle of the north facing building facade. There is at least one pedestrian connection along each of the longest sides of the building. \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 9 3. "Weather protection — Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway....." The north facing public entry is recessed in from the facade of the building. The second floor is cover for this entry which also includes a covered entrance constructed of similar materials to those used on the building. The south facing public entry is protected from weather by a canopy. This canopy also covers a portion of the pedestrian accessway. 4. "Building Materials — Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet." Building exterior finish materials include Hardi Plank siding which is cement gypsum mix wall board. It looks similar to wood siding but is more resistant to weather and aging. Exterior foundation finish material is masonry brick. Approximately 2 feet of the exterior foundation will show on the west side of the building where the slope is lower than finished floor. 5. "Roofs and roof lines — Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary matenals used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted." The building has a pitched roof which is complimentary of the overall design. The design does not include a false front or false roof. 6. "Roof-mounted equipment—All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public street is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt form this standard." As noted above, mechanical devices will be located inside an attic space. 18.620.050 Signs In addition to requirements of Chapter 1 8.780 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met I. "Zoning distnct regulations — ....non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C; and non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone, 8.780.I 30D." \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Source One Network—Site Developme m Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page 10 According to 18.780.130D: 2. "Wall signs shall have certain limitations and conditions when permitted on properties zoned C-P including: (a) Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed 5% in gross area of any wall face on which the sign is to be mounted;" The proposed building mounted sign measures 2 % feet X 13 feet, and does not exceed 5% of the west wall face. (b) "Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located; and" The sign will be constructed of brushed steel with painted on lettering, and will be mounted parallel to the building facade. (c) "If it is determined under the development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50% of the allowable sign area may be permitted. No copy will be permitted, however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos, and letters." The proposed sign is within the size limit. No additional sign area is proposed at this time. 3. "Sign area limits — The maximum sign area limits found in 18.780.1 30 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle." As noted above, the proposed sign will not exceed 5% of the gross area of the west wall face. 3. "Height limits — The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Tnangle." As noted above, the sign measures 2 'A feet high X 13 feet wide, within the I 0 foot high Code maximum. The sign will be mounted between the first and second floors on the building and will not extend above the roofline. 4. "Sign location — Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within L-1 landscape areas." This proposal does not include a freestanding sign. This standard does not apply to this application. \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc • Source One Network—Site Development Review Narrative 03/13/00 Page I 1 8.620.060 Entry Portals "Entry portals shall be required at the primary access points into the Tigard Triangle." I. "Location — Entry portals shall be located at the intersections of 99W and Dartmouth; 99W and 72nd; 1-5 and Dartmouth; Hwy. 217 and 72`x; and at the Hwy. 217 Overcrossing and Dartmouth." 2. "Design — The overall design of entry portals shall relate in scale and detail to both the automobile and the pedestnan. A triangle motif shall be incorporated into the design of entry portals." This proposal is for an office/warehouse building on a site not located at the above listed intersections. The site is not considered an entry portal to the Tigard Triangle. This standard is not applicable. 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening "Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Tnangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met." I. L-I Low Screen 2. L-2 General Landscaping Landscaping of the front and side yards meets the L I standard and includes a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcover. Street trees are included as well as 3 foot high evergreen shrubs along the perimeter of the parking lot. 18.620.090 Design Evaluation The proposal does not include design aspects that deviate from the standards as required above. This section is not applicable to this proposal. /LLD Enclosures \\ADMIN\adman\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\DRapp doc Arbori' f/ ee Fe-P* r± HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and • preservation of trees" CONSULTANTS David Halstead, Consultant 8 S P O. Box 1182,Tualatin.OR 97062 41 Phone.1503)245-1383 ~' March 6, 2000 ► � CIDA ATTN.: Mr. Lans Stout '• 4445 SW Barbur Blvd. Suite 200 • ' Portland, OR 97201 w Reference: Source One Network •.t• Location: 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street • Subject: Tree Assessment 4 4 I have inspected the site and site plan for the Source One Network project • '' located at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street, Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate all trees twelve inches in diameter r and larger(measured at 4.5 feet above ground) to determine if any of these trees t° ♦ need to be removed and therefore mitigated per the City of Tigard's "Mitigation W, Tree Plan, 18.790.030" There are a total of three trees, twelve inches in diameter and larger(measured i at 4.5 feet above ground), within this project and located on the tree survey plan. ') Tree Number One: t A` Located five feet south of Baylor Street sidewalk, mid-property. The Oregon White Oak tree is 18 inches at 4.5 foot above ground. Tree is 45 foot tall and has a 45 foot limb/trunk spread. The tree has been severely pruned ,, I. (topped) due to the high voltage power lines that run through the center of the canopy. However, the tree is in good health and structure. Tree Number Two: Located ten feet south of Baylor Street sidewalk and 10 feet east of SW 67th Avenue. Tree is a double trunk Oregon White Oak. Each trunk measures 14 inches for a total of 28 inches at 4.5 foot above ground. Tree is 55 foot tall and has a 55 foot limb/trunk spread. The tree is in good health and structure. Page 2 March 6, 2000 Reference: Source One Network Location: 67"'Avenue and Baylor Street Subject: Tree Assessment Tree Number Three: Located twenty feet east of SW 67th Avenue and 30 feet north of the south property line. The Oregon White Oak tree is 24 inches at 4.5 foot above ground. Tree is 55 foot tall and has a 55 foot limbftunk spread. The tree is in good health and structure. Trees Number Two and Three are healthy and structurally stable. In order to preserve these two trees, it would require a root zone 40 foot in diameter both east/west and south/north. The third tree (Number One)located on SW Baylor Street is healthy and structurally stable, but it cannot be preserved due to it's location under the high voltage power lines. The building foot print,.hardscapa,grading and excavation necessary for the utilities dose not leave any room for tree survival. Therefore, all three trees will need to be mitigated under the City of Tigard's Mitigation Plan, 18.790.060D. If I can be of further assistance or if more technical information is needed please call. Sincerely, 7-AezSid David Halstead BS CA ASCA • 4445 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TEL: 503.226.1285 FAX• 503.226.1670 E-MAIL: cida @teleport.com • March 13, 2000 City of Tigard Attention: Brian Rager 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Source One Network CIDA Project Number. 98075.10 Dear Brian: This letter accompanies a Site Development Review application for a new office for Source One Network, Inc., at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street. As you know, the site has significant development constraints that dictate the site design, including provisions for an on-site stormwater quality facility. Consequently, this is a request for approval to pay a fee in lieu of construction of an on-site facility, as provided by Section 3.I I.5(d) of the USA Design and Construction Standards. The standards cite four conditions that allow the City to accept a fee in lieu of facility construction. Two of the these are applicable to the Source One Network site, and are addressed as follows: "a) The site topography or soils make it impractical or ineffective to construct an on-site facility." Comment: This site slopes from northeast to southwest, a total of about I I vertical feet in 70 feet horizontally. There is significant slope particularly in the southwest corner of the site, which is also where the driveway and parking must be located as a result of Development Standards that require the building to be located at the street intersection. In order to meet grading criteria and place the building floor elevation properly with respect to the street corner, the driveway must slope at 10 percent upward and the parking spaces at 5 percent cross slope. Also, there is a retaining wall at the south property line adjacent the neighboring site's driveway, and a sanitary sewer line which runs parallel the wall on the Source One Network site. As a result of these factors, the only option for an on-site storm water quality facility would be an underground vault type, located in the vicinity of the driveway approach to SW 67th Avenue. \W DMIN\admin\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\8-30-99_gov.doc ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • INTERIORS • LANDSCAPE Source One Network 03/13/00 Page 2 However, the slope in this area, as noted above, is I0 percent in the driveway and over I 0 percent in landscape areas, making it impossible to place the vault in a way to allow it to receive runoff and discharge to the existing ditch adjacent to SW 67th Avenue. This criterion for a fee in lieu of construction is clearly met. "b) The site is small...." Comment: Notwithstanding the above described topographic issues, the site is only 75 feet by 100 feet, which presents development constraints with respect to meeting the target floor area ratio, minimum parking requirement, minimum landscaping requirement, and building location standard. The parcel is a "lot of record" and was originally a single family dwelling, which also relates to criteria (d). Therefore, the site also meets this criteria for payment of a fee in lieu of construction of the stormwater facility. I have enclosed a copy of the grading and utility plan from the Site Development Review submittal, and a copy of this letter will accompany our Site Development Review application. Thank you for your assistance. , r_.x. Sincerely V Karl Koroch, P.E. LS/Ild Enclosures: Site Development Review grading/utility plan C. Philip Goold,Source One Network Lans Stout,CIDA Site Development Review application File \\ADMIN\admen\GENADMIN\PROJECTS\98\98075\8-30-99_,gov doc • 1 aFaeo 5 • 0010050 v.•m 445 t o 5.1022 di • .515 B.B. r . ? ID QSMO gar; ■ 05 oona•an C a DM "00 1 BF B.500 MCI 0 • S.W. BAYLOR ST. m want lAYO.5 15101 • GENERAL N07E8 — — — rrraai m• — — _ , 9005352025 1445 wvr 40 COOS.051 0005015 910.410•wa0 C5 MOM OF ST VW V mmwcTt wrar DCIDER OF FAY'MTWAmLl. 1150.1.DM u355.:04ns 10500 enema. 0 0 to 40'02•135.350131.5.92.e2401r•ro•oaws weer O a u te ® �``' m /0 KEYNOTES w .50.4 O e9':' • �-u•}' — — H .rv1EAel .• J°/ia- 8� _r�4 8 O 4 000.1...ova Z .m vurom soma 5 sow. ' 1 50 1 72 00'�� mm 1 50 — Q sus-202 44151131•51.44151131•51. Y • p r Cr was 00•*DSW%016211151 TO Cm 0,04.11 504.3000 N • 8 8 05 DIY a TOn 00.(000 00.:20 LL 8 Q us n 115.2 v[mu CUM O 0 - 8 •®4.00 0sa9001.5 Z I, •O 4101.0150 5156.2000;co..I:4 r — 8 . ®or L W z Pry 8 0 we 154111 10 4*000000 - _ 8 Z z -1._ �� ®KV 25 CL•Y WA A 551.•.1^WIT 5 4 ,, • ` ��`���ia�sl��la��V/�,i//�'J i 4 - O corm ma To 4 5555,13-020,25.52 .�oca•rort cc...ma 4 ��II :c. .use W ;1 0 000-5 MN 104 WON° Z 8 II■ 6 I m �S. „ _ m 0 035•10 0.tl•3a[4MF TO 4510 MOM,5145 C.Sr,FDOR O = O = 11570' 509* QO02.013 an F �I1 • • 18 I W OF 0.ST.m CA•ea•.Wt V 5 ��� O 500 0 lava.YWR 041N0.0 IR 5 FR.0 OIOS Or MHYPT L •• 4 1 003•..0051045'M RK5•K 51 Or 1•RIM CRUMP KV 10 02 CT.TO SOrDII 0-1 2 5.m1A '` O Z III a ems') 0 8 1 0 ®unm cat To 4 se•a=-coomwrz Km kw,•ROM01 vy N • 1 0 5,21.5 WRM 42111 UAW. I. 115.03' .OC' 27 50' 24 00' 18.50' � 5 09.3 C 1 _ 0 . Q I 1 are rj m U 1 .1rn 5205. , 7•5059.552 7500' \® • , ,'1�{Lj��,�7� ..\i 5 Fviaw�° 4 0 °�N SD 1 K 1 .a•.a 98075 8 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES - _I';J_I. '_,_!_'_r _`�I.J;_I J 1_I -P-'--0- _I1.I_rl t�_I_I 5 j L: _l_�'� !1 ---c A * ,.,,„,/,,..7„ ,--.7..,n,,.. . . . . ,,,r_iy( .0;, Tip_n_ii „ . . . ,...____r.: , ,, . . . __ _ _ _1)_ _ _ f _ _ . l_!__1_ I ,J 1!..3,- k,i. a-f '. 1.ari R1' )LCj crs3._I .0 I rIl.!_tf 13 i:_ O i.ii.U11•i) ' . -. - . '/ NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: J-/ -9 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: L17-V e � fd APPLICANT: /_ei..' 5---4.--/- AGENT: Phone:( l Phone: ( l • PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: // .70 SW 71/ TAX MAP(Sl/LOT#(S1: /5/3E DD 1z974. 4+ 390o NECESSARY APPLICATION(Sl: _ / PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 6;,75-1,-v,/ 4/0(04 3000 4' ,i cs`v/il j 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: /✓'!/E ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: fi./61 C.I.T.AREA: (4 dA_ FACILITATOR: PHONE (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: 91S," ft. Setbacks: Front 9 ft. Side C 10 ft. Rear /2 ft. Corner -- ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: %_ %. (Refer to Code Section 18.52° 7— l P14-z° re-a< /•'/;-`°/ �s.'.,,4% ra5.`—;-," °''si ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS - MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) CITY OFTIPARD Pre-Appllcatlou Conference Motes Page tot 9 WHaa.wv IUnaa.vn.ulei IMlal..teen.. SPECIAL SETBACKS • STREETS: feet from the centerline of D ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from . D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. • FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK, (Refer to Code Chapter 18.130) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR)of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D All actual building setbacks will be at least half(%) of the building's height; and D The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18330.010BJ /44,54,..e4 /r., rn,yf�J4 7 t 7Z p ��s. viz ,� o o.To.C- ARKING AND A Q/� 3 'icelj�� ED parking for this type of use: O�c`' ", br'`'1/!a°' Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): C • SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: D Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area In front of a wheel stop or curb can be Included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.165.040) Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space. symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. D BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: 3 0' • Minimum pavement width: �y All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved.. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.165 and 18.7051 CITY INWARD Pre-Agellcatlon Conference Motes - Page 2 of 9 111114altudst 4uUestlas/Masslss MMstss isetlss A[KWAY REQUIREM S SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.105.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 LEA VISION AR i requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BliEFERING AND SCREENING C'7/) 4‘49'4/L-//4 4's«r;� Sf�,��/'a5%��'/%i �f� � `��"� �'°'�`��` In or er SE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) • The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: 2r v cn(c �64L) DSCAPI C EET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OFTICARD Pre-D uIlcatlon Conference Notes - Page 8 of 9 UI.iasMaatlal YpUeaiaa/Ptaulas Man tacOaa • '1NS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.180) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUI 'ABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAI' , NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PE- ENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive land areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the res••nsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility •, the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated •i .• -I submitted with the development application, Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or odification of sensitive lands areas. _� • _ . _ _• • 1/ _► :• .l: D . ► .._•• 1 ' ; • (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a fi :I order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of e Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based up- field exploration and investigation and shall • include specific recommendations for achieving t - requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R& 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SE ITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enou• to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SH L BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of t - sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the w'•th of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of - portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an ar=- of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encr•-chment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the I= gth of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in dth. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the egetate Corridor: NO structures, • -velopment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any aterials of any kind, or other activities shall be.permitted which otherwise detract from the water •uality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: > A G- • 'EL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the wal • ay or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the pa . A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet •m the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CRY OFTIGARD Pre-lppllcatfoo Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 IIU-1.d s tlalWeekUWulaIMAslui•c1te■ D WATER QUALITY FAG., . VIES may encroach into the vegetal, :orridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. . oc_aation of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or ots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be ••ntained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction • a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements t - policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between dev• opment and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified • the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable e•••nomic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect signifi -• t wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enh- ce water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize stream►ank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreatio =1 and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor; The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE R. 0UIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" • ovisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require tha significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, w • is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-B ,. RING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less t -n 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). D Major streams in Tigard incl•de FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBU • RY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams; Streams which are NOT 'FISH :EARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tig d include Summer Creek, Deny Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and cede' short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area; This AREA IS MEASU- D HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOr-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The ripa '-n setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). D The stan•-rd TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accorda - with this chapter. D The •JOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with is chapter. D IS LATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot `water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030) CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Appllcation Conference Motes - Page 5 of 9 rat-i•gUWa14o0catl•u/Maadul Mai Satin • Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN ' ER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow th- •lacement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided t.: equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through stream.. restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian - •ack area. gligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDU •N, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed . the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Ve•< . ion Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species curre cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy cu - ly covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not b- removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vege - 'on was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating remo . of native plant species; ➢ at there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.100] E REMOVAL PCAWREQWREM �� �((A `� PA THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; b Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD. OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes - Page 6 of 9 i•i-issNaatlal looacatl•a/Plualaa Wife"iacthu • 6A110 - PLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: b The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and • ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.1) RRAT� The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32) CI 1E CHAPTERS _ 18.330 X18.390 c18.520 _ 18.715 i .18.765 ✓18.795 _ 18.350 _ 18.420 18.530 _ 18.730 _ 18.775 18.797 iZ 18.360 _ 18.430 18.620 r/ 18.745 _✓18.780 ,18.800 18.370 _ 18.510 18.705 X18.755 ✓18.790 ‘11,0STWIT-) - As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) CITY OFfl6AMO Pre-Appllcattaa Calumet:Notes Pagel of 9 11111-lesidest1 sI IeuUesduRtuales Mau Satin EIG B IIOOD MEETIN TI-tE ANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification- handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your ap lication r the application will not be accepted. Meier to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION • PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of ard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat namin. r-• -. •• e Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtai -ea s•- reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be acre. -e _ •mplete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the C. - • o the Subdivision Name Reservation. [ • • urveyors Office: 503-648-8884) I ILDING PERMI FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). CYCLING plicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 18355] ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • ' /' r — T' I YiC l �u�i 42,... c f7�7- i- ' 1/ 2# e 7 t ./Tj79( s 7 5.0x s ,- 2_6-, (/✓C�.'vc /�.J7bi<�� 7:7ir 4✓4.420 ,/ �;e c1iE vrrc e, i s cam, J!i// _ -•J ,/!c/✓,/e ��/�.'�L <7-'c7j'G i.•s ✓CC ,( G' 14-e• - • i� �QM i• 4/ e ✓ll��c / Cl.p�F_ 4,4 'tiii r�.�,��,U, �'y,;���s-� ✓��SJ(-elf, ,H/;tei,,!7 ;VG CITY OFT1GARD Pre-Appllcatiaa Conference Notes Page E of 9 KIM-asNs•tlal IsI lcat1../rta..t.l IMZJ..$.c2ta. PROCEDURE >/ Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Communi Development Department at Tigard City.Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE; Applications • ll � ' t ! 11 _1 • • • • • • • • 1 e • 1 • • . I1.1 • • 1 • es . 1 - 11 . S . returned. Applications wi I NOT be accepted after 300 P.M. on Fridays or 430 on other week days, Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to &5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted, The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period followA,all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard o <z.— . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cangot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective. applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior fo submitting an application. • AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: T 4 ' ,.lc_ CITY OF TIGARD-nANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PIE-APP. MEETn PHONE: 503 639-0i?1 FAX: 503 684-1291 E-MAIL staf s first name)@ci.tigard.or.us clmrpinMnsten4erised\pnupp-c mst (Engoeir ng section:prupp.eng)\ 'Mud 1/28/99 CITY OF MARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 • 11S114edl a dil UapfcetleiRlsaelet IMslest Secaoe CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST -le-se -ad his form caref II in c•n' n ion with he no es •rovi•e• o o . he •r-- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. • Staff: 3/41 11 jd Date: q • • 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size,addressed with 1"x 4"labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information,each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): [—�/Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan [C' Existing Conditions Map I - Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map Q- reliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Jree Preservation/Mitigation Plan IRK Site Development Plan _ B� Architectural Drawings Er- Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings Er- Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /R COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. • City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES ANL ..EPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop,THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation • ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Ia Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other • 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8Y2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). / cinity Ma �--- J° ' ,/ Q7/ ��r� ii''ec./ike�. ,4 Showing the location of the site in relation to: r•, • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ *sting Conditions Ma • Parcel boundaries,dimensions and gross area 0 Contour lines (2'intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes>10%) • Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils - ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with z 6"caliper measured 4'from ground level 0 • Location and type of noise sources • Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist _ Page 2 of 5 • Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision o Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as vocable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%.grades and 5'intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location,type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures,and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions(if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ • Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent • ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑❑ Contour lines(2'intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) Location,width and names of streets,easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses • ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level 0 All slopes greater than 25% Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 t e De opment Plan T e proposed site and surrounding properties • ❑ Contour line intervals [] The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site 0 • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas • ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ �sca n Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials • ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas,arid common open spaces ❑ `c Improvements/St er ets Plan • Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist - Page 4 of 5 . .' • - • on Control Plan - oca ons and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ flities P Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system,showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ relimina rainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways • ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ n i igation P aT Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees • ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ rchitectural Drawing) Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ �4O6'1ec5 ncS,•;C/A/y.1 or T'9 jfc pc57; Sign Drawings .� Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ • • is'curpinlmasterslrevised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 , City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • PRE-APPLICATION sCONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q srilcm, , \ 7>UP ■C PUBLIC FACILITIES • g6o The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the.City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a proiection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. • Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval ofia fevelo2ment application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for. c012-1,r62.-' " ZD►� ZS feet ue. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. • ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( fz_ street improvements will be necessary along Svc C0-14'L Ave. to include: [r \ e, feet of pavement Fib -G= [rconcrete curb ['storm sewers and other underground utilities (o -foot concrete sidewalk ['street trees [Vstreet signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Apppcatlon Conference Notes - Page 1 of 6 ra/tuerbu lgartnent Section L "rort-- street ' 'rovements will be necessary along ��� Sec• to include: Cr feet of pavement El concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk IBstreet trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk • ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district., The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) . ( " Section 18.810.12Q of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CRY OF T16ARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 et 6 faWuttq IqulmntSaetin • • are on the opposite s' )f the street from the site. If the f 'n-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot .,, street frontage that contains the c. Head lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW (a1 e l - • Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. I�f�.. �/�c c A e,...S 4..cv.6 f o1-4 U �► Col 44^ -rte ,PPS y CD-1 •, Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) B inch line which is located tN Tc (PTV Zo.,w� ►ki-c6tsc-,cr.�! . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer.' It is the developer's responsibility to t.-A ■ yc u N4e Acs Kr , *Cr%,S Sc'Co At—r At iAc t Uh4t4.).._ u�tt�n�R�z� PP-m-(4.s . Water Supply: The u DST - Phone:(503) 2-447-ris7)I provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: rr,ct(k,.AuN Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Ceee—Bfrchill (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. • c5((c • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75)which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OFTIGARD P-re-Appfcatlon Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 fa/heerlq Ugerteet Eeetloe • newly created impervious su• 's. The resolution contains a prow° '-in that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constn._.,ng an on-site facility provided spe , criteria are met. The City will ' use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: • ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility) o� ( 3' Payment of the fee in-lieu. a J Pftfb VeS(61.-1 -.t 14/01‹3)51-(R./ 'G-i at'Ti t F- cOakireilitab) Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to r main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee , must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CRY OF TIGARD Pro-Amdlcatloa Coiderence Notes • Pago 4 of 6 hth� �muumtSatin • . - In addition, the perm' ' will be required to post a bond - similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. • NOTE: If an Engineering Permit Is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. • Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes - Page 5 of 6 Eatttnuos tiqutout Section • GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOr 'BDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when.the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each - homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: EN NEERING DEPAR ENT STAFF • Phone: (5031639-4111 • • Fax: (5031 684-1291 hApattyvnastersspreapp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 • CITY IFTIGARD Pre-Ippfcatlon Conference Notes - Page 6 e16 Entombs upn...tSatin JOSEPH HUGHES CONSTRUCTIuN, INC. 7035 SW Hampton Street Est # 20-008sou November 30, 1999 Tigard, OR 97223 CEWElp Project name Source One Network RE G 11670 SW 67th Ave. Tigard OROR 1 6 7 Washington OPM�NT OR 97223 °E4 ll Client Source One Network ON siA)C T 0 N) 11670 SW 67th Ave 4 + N �. Tigard OR 97223 CQ Sf (503)624-6020 Architect CIDA GS 4 t rna (503)226-1285 a�ci u ' l Estimator Dwane Carver Job size 2994 SF Duration 120 days Bid date 12/8/1999 2:00 AM Audit Standard Project Source One Network BID/BUDGET/NEG'T BUDGET NEW/SHELL/TI NEW CLIENT CONTACT: Philip Goold CLIENT FAX: 503-624-6860 OFFICE(STANDARD) STANDARD OFFICE Report format Sorted by'Group phase/Phase' 'Detail'summary 5 • :PH HUGHES CONST. INC. Spreadsheet Report Page 2 Source One Network 12/29/1999 9:23 AM i,' ^,c :,.i;:,) n<�:^xsk„8tc �,��cU�E E„s, EEr� ^=r:<✓^R� age)i'�k `#�EE i^is)i i,::k`•'1�;,:^�3,:,,2..hC E.:'EC,k,IlE�> ;�;` ;.. kla'Ly,.;,i x 1 ` : ,iLa bQ yr 01 a E <,4.; S � 0 V•' .�z 3 �mV00 n \'¢4� e, �`<`.>”,�,,£^.E d,f,a,,;•�`i,x..�i "lE E?,# a^'EN:\�kZ?xZEi�nEi u n 5 Pk1ase M - � k35& '. x VE , x GENERAL CONDITIONS Division 1 Subcontractors 1152100 Temp Fence 600 Public Protection,security 1170110 Surveying 1,850 Supervision - 110100 Superintendent 18,900,Supervision Temp -Utilities 151100 Temp Electncity 200 151100 Phone&Fax 1,000 .151100 Temp Water 200 151100 Temp Toilet(Rent) 600 Temp -Facilities 152100 Job Trailer 1,400 Job Sign 1 159100 Job Sign(Buy New) 300, Tools& Equipment 160100 Tools&Equipment 6,000 Clean Up 170300 Current Cleanup 3,600 170500 Rent Dumpster 2,500 Punchlist, Etc 1172500 Punchlist,etc 1,300 Travel -All Types !174100 Mileage/P/U deliv 500, DEMOLITION Demolition { '207110 Demo Existing Buildings and Trees 14,510: SITEWORK Division 2 Subcontractors 252600 --Paving and Surfacing- - 7,040 290000 Landscaping and Irrigation 10,806 299000 ,Block retaining wall 7,390.Includes system and gravel found_at. Excav -Excavation & Fill 221025 Sanitary Sewer 3,250 POC shown or tie into existing 1221025 Water Line 792 assume no meter upgrade 12221025 Storm Sewer System 7,015 drain to ditch as shown 21025 Move Fire Hydrant 2,500 Will need approval from Fire Ma__rshal Excav- Bulk Cut 222001 Bulk Cut 20,838'Large rock removal charged as T&M Paving Marking 1258001 Lot Stnping 500, Signage Traffic !284600 Sign Handicap Parking 200 CONCRETE Division 3 Subcontractors - -- 332610 Concrete Sub 23,560 Foundations,slab,site flatwork Conc -All Types Generic 1332610 .Concrete Material&Misc 13296 METALS Division 5 Subcontractors 500001 Misc&Struct Steel 5,950 assume building strucural steel WOOD 8 PLASTICS Division 6 Subcontractors 7 PH.HUGHES CONST. INC. Spreadsheet Report * Page 3 Source One Network 12/29/1999 9:23 AM ',>x xe.4 4 <�.4i ;•k$.• :^^1 ,:69:,‘? . , :`3431: ^ w l? I I 3`.:, I, r:xzx ;i•; 3�3'F ,r�':f,:A•;x!„<N .: z , x 2 F .Labor:Jel ezt e y & Mygr ,4,w' �w?�� vex. AK"aA SROOpr pto:3 „ zl t� st A ;ri �x „0. a« u t"„ •� �x•":xixxxz n, z «0,� <, Division 6 Subcontractors 600001 ,Framing Sub Labor Only 18,000, 620000 Millwork Sub Labor Only 3,055 Wood trim and door and window casing 1 640000 Cabinets&Shelves 4,680 commercial white plastic laminate 1 60.0001 ,Exterior Siding 21,270 Hardy cement products Fasteners -Frame Anchors 600100 Lumber Material 28,690 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT Division 7 Subcontractors 720000 Insulation Sub(Batts&Blown) 5,753 750000 Shngle Roofing 5,940 20 yr shingles 762000 Sheetmetal 2,500 Flashing and gutters DOORS & WINDOWS Division 8 Subcontractors - I 800001 Interior Doors,frames and Hardware 4,480, 800001 Exterior Doors and Hardware 1,570 800001 Intenor Window Frames 1,275 i 800000 Storefront 15,900, 800000 Fire Resistant Windows Near PL 4,000 FINISHES Division 9 Subcontractors 925300 Drywall 10,736 1 941001 Quarry Entry Tile 279 951000 ,Acoustical Ceilings 4,897. i 966001 Carpet,vinyl,tile,rubber base 8,441 991000 Paint Intenor Walls 3,789 991000 Paint Doors and Windows__ 1,305: 1991000 Paint Extenor of Building 3,260 999000 Bath Wainscote 350 SPECIALTIES Division 10 Subcontractrs 1000001 Toilet Accessories 1,400 MECHANICAL Plumbing • 154000.0- Plumbing(Lump Sum) 12,000,Includes water line to meter HVAC Systems 1550000 HVAC System 13,473 Must incorporate ductwork in structural ELECTRICAL Electrica l Complete . 1600100 Electrical(Lump Sum) 14,970 Excludes data and communication cabling Estimate Totals Labor 44,450 1,043 312 hrs Material 85,291 Subcontract 218,869 Equipment 1,548 867 hrs 348,610 348,610 Profit&Overhead T Sales Tax T Total 348,610 116.436/SF , , , ,, r ___.____ tITYOFTIGARD MF A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Community Development [Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six[6I Months) SfiapingA Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL rt --APP.MTG.DATE: J—/}�—c/FF AT PRE-APP.: JT/.veR -1-- . APPLICANT: /_�, -; 0L- -- AGENT: Phone:[ l Phone: [ I PROPERTY LOCATION: l ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: //6 7th .51-I /�-tl TAX MAP[Sl/LOT#[Sl: /S/36 DD / 44- 3900 NECESSARY APPLICATION[SI: _ , / PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 6,7c4/ A/0✓ /.4 33«--) �i1 si cz l- dol;:, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9 MAP DESIGNATION: , VE-L_ I ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C.I.T.AREA: a✓' L^4 idt- FACILITATOR: PHONE: [5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: - sq. ft. Average lot width: 5J' ft. Maximum building height: ft. Setbacks: Front e '' ft. Side eft. Rear c ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 'S [Refer to Code Section 18.52° 7— 1 '14 ?° i- S 37. 6"4-7 9 f, (-2:5' '' °d* ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet, unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-IesIdeutIalApplication/Manning OWlstoa Section 1 SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ ESTABLISHED AREAS: feet from • ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.130) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (%2) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8.1 ,7 yi c_ ��loicit ql .1" IF a 020.C. S ARKING AND A A//,, 3 wxe4�s� .S14«/fz "I REQtJ1 EDD parking for this type of use: 17/1;"' 2.7 5 //aaa P 9 tYP �"'4s �? Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): .� SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 5 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.7051 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-ApplicatIon Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-lesldeetlal Oppllcatlee/►laeele9 OlMlsloa Sectlee WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS - WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) CLEAR VISION ARC The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 BRING AND SCREENING ( �y �v I_-//a-;�s�4 ;�SOU,ti/:��<�f „a„-A:„. 44-1. 'a $ Pc•f ib, Air In order I U INC EASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ii, ' 4?'41 y1-. 4) LANDSCAPIIiG s� q/ ems'. STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Besldeutlal AopllcatlamMiaolag Division Satin GNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUI 'ABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAI•., NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PE ENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive land areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the resp•nsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility • the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on •lans submitted with the development application, Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or odification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN . OODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) • STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a fi .I order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of e Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based up► field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving t - requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.2 and 18.775.080.C.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA)BUFFER STANDARDS,R& ! 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SE ITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enou• to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SH• L BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of t - sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the w'•th of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of - portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an ar_- of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encr•-chment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the I: gth of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in dth. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the egetate Corridor: NO structures, • -velopment, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any aterials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water •uality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: > A G" • /EL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the wal ay or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the pa . A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet •m the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 110HeddeaalalApouatloa/Plaunluo OMsloNSection ' > WATER QUALITY Fh—iLITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or ots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be •ntained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction o a dwelling unit. (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements t - policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between dev- opment and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified • the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable eu•nomic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significa't wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enh. ce water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize stream•ank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreatio -1 and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor; The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE R- •UIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" • ovisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require tha "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, w ' h is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-B ,. RING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less t .n 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard incl 4 de FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBU ' RY CREEKS)AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams; Streams which are NOT "FISH :EARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tig..rd include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certa' short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area; This AREA IS MEASU' D HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TO'-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The ripa an setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary' in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). > The stan• :rd TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accords - with this chapter. ➢ The JOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with,t is chapter. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030) CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 11O11-9sgdenUal Appncrilon/Plualag Division Section • 'Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN . VER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow th- •lacement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided t.: equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through stream• - restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian - sack area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDU ON, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed - the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Ve•: ion Study required by Section 18.797.050 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species curre cover less than 80%of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy cu - ly covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not b- removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vege - on was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.050 regulating remo - of native plant species; ➢ at there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.100) • REMOVAL ' 1,1' I IREM ,i • - ° • " • - THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D. according to the following standards: a Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.060.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Apoilcatlon Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-BesMeatlal Appliculon/Muaing Nlslslon Section GAT10 PLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: a The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property; and The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E1 NARRATIVE/ The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.321 C E CHAPTER 18.330 — 18.390 18.520 — 18.715 - 18.765 ✓18.795 _ 18.350 18.420 18.530 18.730 18.775 _ 18.797 r✓18.360 _ 18.430 _ 18.620 18.745 18.780 ,/18.800 ✓ 18.370 18.510 18.705 ,./18.755 ✓18.790 ‘(PACT ST88Y As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-lesldeotlal Application/Planning NAVIN Wilco NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION • PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat names request with�Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain_ provafiffeservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be acce omplete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the Cful ty"of the Subdivision Name Reservation. (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) BUILDING PERMITS ----PEAS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: evYdr, .x21 q "rend; ,c', (r, -ekrq 'o �7N✓r- ate.' d 5�0 i� /)fv.td Per 9i as( 7%If J, Xy6z. !/ v, tl//(t /.CC/ee t. (e rewte 7-J ?Li 4)IL 4-ray . (�� �v,/.I�.r Gi [ 'M, �x�lrl�•- �e 1YC ,r /cq o//J- �fi—cc., ,h ePoL✓ rerOw-,ra/Sr�e 74. r rrcr../i / _ 1 P v v I .4- _. , , (a's. .r �� .S7//rte j - niv e �_��� /-��s c �j � ��., ,� j t /.;, kvIll,& - ;11:; ` S * r /70t.✓�4 / l i £,,-'i'r. 4/ //77 9Ie. A,;di'rds`4ae/rer l'isy/ff4f.e 441/ 74./1/ CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page i et MOM-lasldenUel Appllcatlaa/fleaalag OWlsloa Section ' • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2 1 x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10-day public appeal period followL49,ll land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard f%y- Ors-;Cz! . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is a ilable from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective• applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF T GGARDd NFNG DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503 639-4111 FAX: 503 684-1291 E-MAIL staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us i:\arpin\masten\revised\preapp-crost (Engineering section:preapp.eng)\ Revised 1/28/99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NONiesltlentlel Appllatlots/Rsao100 DMsloa Satin CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: ,p/fq J��, Date: -a y 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed envelopes and a notarized list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be legal-size, addressed with 1"x 4" labels Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): IV/Vicinity Map 19' Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan G Existing Conditions Map 9—Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map 22 reliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Er-. Site Development Plan a Architectural Drawings 12r- Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings Er' Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /X COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLC e S AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to. • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby i e ections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25°/ ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe s it erosion potential ❑ • Areas having sev ely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_ 6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • 4. • SPECIAL STUDIES AN.. REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Er Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). cinity 6� .167) 74, /6t.,& �f ( uI its//e S/ 91iC Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ xisting Conditions Ma Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer,engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines(2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25'of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • ' i e De • opment Plan T e proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations,dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes • ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ ndsca e�Rl�n Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ ublic Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 . .' . roslon Control Plan e oca ions and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ _ilities PI Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ hrelimina- -Stort Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ -ree-Preservatron/Mitig ati- o� Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ rchitectural Drawings '; Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure. ❑ Rc✓a&iesr 21/45,2 Ci. r' 9 aF'M t/6/6•PCS- 7 .<✓w-d- Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;cu rpin\masters\revised\chkl ist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION City of C � ni Shaping Better Community k DD PUBLIC FACILITIES The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (�'vlv5 ( coR4 .ate feet e. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( )______ to feet from centerline. Street improvements: ( street improvements will be necessary along S� (-0-1 to include: 1 E feet of pavement E a€ A F' concrete curb [a'storm sewers and other underground utilities R (2 -foot concrete sidewalk 'street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page l of 6 Engineering Department Section (.' ' � 17Pre.:11 stye rprovements will be necessary ak ›et". to include: feet of pavement ❑ concrete-curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk 0 street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk • ❑ street trees El street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section are on the opposite 'e of the street from the site. If the 3 in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal fool of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW CD1 e . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. sy' S ••.i tot —144 kL API) Y -� c9-1 Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) B inch line which is located Co141 Z,T . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to �� �C �•3-c u, �5 _ 7 -Co s��-uE; Ti-h s StC� Pt-�� T� l/ , Pt' R�5 . Water Supply: The �� \)J r ._ ( ,S1' - Phone:(503) 2-` ,3Z ( provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: r<ic..rtcN`,;\■e_, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Geee—Birchiff, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. • E.ANS(f - Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF T1GABO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 016 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious aces. The resolution contains a F sion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of cons, acting an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( 1 Construction of an on-site water quality facility) o� ( L) Payment of the fee in-lieu. --� PkFa se 6Sc ysTt ceTi l f Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section ' In addition, the per tee will be required to post a bor w similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all. grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-AppHcatlon Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS F( 'UBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: �. ISIr1 EN NEERING DEPAR ENT STAFF Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (5031 684-7297 hlpatty\masterskpreapp.eng (Master section.preapp-r.mst) 04-March-7999 CITY OF TICARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section >f Apps ( D Meetings) S M T W T F S 1 $ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ::::::E:::::::# ::::3;?: :::>>: ;:::::::;:Y;::::::#EEE'•£:E!:::::::::#::::::'r'::E:::><>::»:::<:sz::>:3::>z:::_»>::::>::::>:::::: :::<:>`:::::>:::::>::::>:»:::>:::;:g 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ................................. . ->3 < 30 31 8:00 l 9:00 V 9.30 : :R*,e;,i /1,;'(,)( 14 10:00 ........... ........................W::....:. :...................................................... ............................................................................................................ /(1A 10:30 11:00 t� 11:30 12:00 7 /05 12:30 F4t? L �9L 1:00 1:30 azik- old 7Lp r rn 2:00 2:30 -/9vds 12/1/5 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 4:45PM Wednesday, May 05, 1999 I Pre-Apps (CD Meetings)<,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::. • : .;:.::.::.;::.:.:: . T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 11 12 1 14 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 27�'�::��' 23 5 26 2 28 29 M -1 .0, 1 9 1 :.: ueda may 9 8:00 8. `.v .. ;Source fr ::.::::..=- #d € : 3A ':..r#::>::.:` -98 2 La�1 StOui . 226 . 5 > ::>::>:::»:::>::>::«::: >>:::>:<:::::::<:>:>::>::<:€:>:::::>:::::«:::>:><:::>::::::: 8:30 1:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 • 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 4:45PM Wednesday, May 05, 1999 ELI 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 420 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TEL. 503.226.1285 FAX 503.226.1670 E-MAIL• cida @teleport.com May 4, 1999 City of Tigard Planning Department Attn.: Julie. I-lajduk,Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Source One Network—Pre-Application Conference CIDA Project Number. 98075.10 Dear Julia Enclosed is a site plan and filing fee for a pre-application conference to address the Source One Network site at 11670 SW 67°i Avenue. The goal of this project is to provide a single story building of about 3,000 square foot,to include office space and storage for our client's business. As discussed in our meeting of April 13, 1999,we have examined a number of attemative site plans to address the difficult site constraints as well as access and building orientation. The site plan that accompanies this letter meets the Code standards for building placement, and provides the minimum amount of parking required,while also meeting our client's needs. Specific issues that we would like to address in our pre-application conference include: (I) A tree in the public right-of-way will have to be removed due to grading required for a sidewalk. We would like to confirm that since the tree is off-site, its removal does not have to be mitigated. (2) The accessible access to the main entry will need to be a ramp,which effects landscaping in the area between the street and parking. We would like to confirm that this does not conflict with Development Code landscape standards. (3) The site design provides nearly the maximum building floor area allowed by Code (50%), and the minimum parking with vehicular access. Because of the small size of the site,these area allocations result in less than 15%landscaping. Since the floor area drives the viability of the project,we would like to discuss the potential for an adjustment to either the parking or landscaping requirement Please call with questions. Sincerely, 4t(d Lans Stout Planner/ Real Estate Consultant LS/IId Endowres ♦ARCHITECTURE •ENGINEERING Cc GreggSanders,CIDA •PLANNING File •LANDSCAPE •INTERIORS \W OSTRA\Admin\GENADMI N\PROJECTS\98\98075\0.5-4-99_gov doc 1C �°3QUq,b'. 0• I,DD,, M44RIYAk''DC g-0C m AG°3C Cpl04EC�4U ° [ PoC� Q C�0.DG;1 .n.=y ,•r - i'�.•. '� . ,,.•fir , 5200 S.W.MACADAM AVENUE,SUITE 420 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 TEL:(503)226-1285 FAX:(503)226-1670 TOLL FREE:(888)226-1285 E-MAIL: cida@teleport.com TRANSMITTAL PROJECT NO.: DATE: 9- `q0I PROJECT NAME: AC& One N c/ a-YV, ATTN: 3utua i - COMPANY: VI I�J of Til& - PI Om ADDRESS: .� ENCLOSED: o PLANS o SPECIFICATIONS ❑. COPY OF LETTER ❑ DETAILS ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ CALCULATIONS ❑ SKETCHES 'OTHER - pre Du,���i,,, pre-ate• P �r•""� NO.OF COPIES DESCRIPTION -App. Pre- Y93(krA I- 1,0PAr- Sckt rom id FOR YOUR USE ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ RETURNED o FOR APPROVAL o AS REQUESTED o OTHER COMMENTS: • COPIES TO: I 'v' 1 170f i GYrt SO1v eAJ b. JJov iy -GIP `pu,.. /� DELIVER O PICK UP O MAIL SIGNED: O NEXT DAY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ARCHITECTURE P.C. • CIDA INC. S.W. BAYLOR ST. _ atastair--. _ —. \ \ %., .. \ , I 0 i • 41 ' 1 . . ... r . •.._ , • , 11111! :1 1 . ‘) :', _ _ — , .........- ammo ■Im . 71 • • \, ! OFFICE , WAREHOUSE ,.. 1734 S.F. •'-, r j STOWE —2•, I i 1240 S.F. t_______-- I . 1 • I 1 I I t 1 't„ t t \ . i 1 TOTAL AREA /.2 • ; i I - 2974 S.F. . till c•-- , 6 . • -- "- -kc'. Ii . • . ILIAC' \ , ,.IIIJ .0 0 ., :- , 1 -2,-,,......._\ ... • I .,.. ., es........., , , 1 1 1 III II,.t. 1 ' ' 1 '. ■ ', 1 ; v 1 k , / ._.. 7) 1 I I \ \ •,f:',':Y").-- '' --. • / , ' ,\ , t., \ ,. s. . I ; ■ •,, • , ., ,, . , ..,. j \ i \\- 'i „ •'. ..„.. `,. I '. \ \ \ 1 I • r t ) , \'';'S \ , , / !( I ? .(. ;• Z, _ . ,\ — . .—., " I l.ss \ I j . . Le.....'ILIE ri.....2 ....\\41., . ''', I, / . ,. : .... ..ift ., ‘ ,.. -5-4., , _ .,_ _ - TEL: 503.226.1265 I ■ . .,. x . '• • ,s.9..., ''',. 7,-1 FAXt 503.226.1070 : -` '\ .t. ' A''-, : 5200 SW MACADAM. SUITE E A20 - \ ‘ I \:- '-'..., PORTLAND. OR 07201 T -. I . I =NOCK MUM%OCSOI MD PL OCA . • 6 SOURCE ow anE PLAN ......,..10' I . ,- 05%18/99 TUE 15:47 FAX 503 226 1670 CIDA I4001 • 5200 SW MACADAM AVENUE, SUITE 420 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TEL: 503.226.1 285 FAX: 503.226.1 670 E-MAIL: cida @teleport.com FAX MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18, 1999 SUBJECT: Meeting Minutes City of Tigard Planners PROJECT TITLE: Source One PROJ. NUMBER: 98075 BY: Gregg Sanders PRESENT: Julia Hajduk, Planner, Crty of Tigard, FAX 684-7297 Brian Rager, Engineer, City of Tigard, FAX: 684-7297 Phil Gould, Source One, FAX 624-6860 Lans Stout, CIDA Gregg Sanders, CIDA PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMENTS—Julia Hajduk I. A neighborhood meeting will be required for this project. However,the Design Review will not require a public hearing. 2. The zone is MUE; it has a maximum FAR of 0.40. Our site is 7,500 SF; therefore our maximum allowable building area is 3,000 SF. Julia wrote that the maximum was 2,962 based on a scaled drawing, however the site area she had shown was incorrect 3. Julia was concerned about the warehouse use. However the code allows warehouse uses as long as they are ancillary to a permitted use. Office is permitted. 4. Based on the warehouse/office areas shown a total of six parking spaces are required. Our site plan shows six spaces. 5. The landscape requirement is 15%. In order to be counted as landscaping,the element must be a permeable surface. Sidewalks do not count as landscaping. The code does not allow a variance for the landscaping requirement However, it does allow a variance to the parking minimums. We may need to apply for a variance to reduce the parking requirement and use the space for landscaping. 6. Julia is concerned about the lack of landscaping in front of the parking on SW 67th, We suggested a trellis or wall. The code encourages walls, she will check on applicability. ENGINEERING COMMENTS—Brian Rager ♦ARCHITECTURE I. Code standard for sidewalks is property-line tight SW Baylor is already improved, but •ENGINEERING it is curb-tight Brian will allow the Baylor improvement as-is. SW 67"'will need to be •PLANNING ♦LANDSCAPE •INTERIORS • u u t A L. ! A • • — ! ■ . 05:'18/99 TUE 15:48 FAX 503 226 1670 CIDA Q002 MEMORANDUM,Meeting Minutes April,13, 1999 April 13, 1999 Page 2 improved to current standards. The accessible curb at the comer will require a right of way dedication. 2. Street trees will be required. The type is a 25-foot spreading deciduous at 22-feet on center. A list of acceptable species in available in the code. 3. The site has overhead utilities on both street frontages. The code requires improvements to the frontage where the power is supplied. Improvements either require burying the power or paying a fee. The utility decides if the power may be buried. The fee is $27.50 per lineal foot. 4. Brian is concerned about the sewer service on Baylor. His maps do not show sewer service along the Baylor frontage. Phil is certain that everyone in the area is on sewer. It is up to the owner to prove that service exists since the city does not show a connection. CIDA will arrange for a sewer location. If sewer service is not provided,the • sewer line will have to be extended along Baylor as a condition of development. 5. Tualatin Valley Water District is the water-supplying jurisdiction. 6. A downstream analysis is no longer required for storm water. However, on site detention and quality is required. Predevelopment analysis may include the existing house and the existing compacted gravel drive. The city does accept underground compost filters. The fee-in-lieu-of aftemate is available, but requires a very compelling argument 7. The Traffic Impact Fee will assessed at the time of the building permit. Ten trips will be credited for the existing building. • Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. If any errors or omissions are noted, recipients are asked to please provide written response within five days of receipt. GDS/ cc All Present File • ►,° ao00 rrr'g ITY - A - . PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Tigard,Oregoi . ; [Pre-Applicadon Meeting Notes are Valid for Six[6),Months) t- NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE:-/� STAFF AT PRE-APP.: y r1/Ige APPLICANT: 1PA1lio Govad AGENT: Phone:[5131 62y-60 a:0 Phone: [ ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN.LOCATION: /1670 SW 6 71.X TAX MAPS)/LOT#[S): /S f 36 D D- 03400 NECESSARY APPLICATION[S): Si I De vdd p ,- Rev eW PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Calved- oxl's/7%�q res,'dinc . -/r, DPgce 44./,4/1Srs ,c 4c46/10.14/ S�rtr drircs COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: /Y1vf -Mixed Vic EY,dy41 ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: /Yl vE CJ.T.AREA 54. FACILITATOR: r« /:sf-P•ow,ra/c�/ PHONE (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: R0 sq. ft.Average lot width: Co ft. Maximum building height: 4/-S,ft. Setbacks: Front Ql ft. Side 0 ft. Rear , ft. Corner 0 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: 85 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 clo ,,may/ ,(Refer to Code Section 18.62•OS 0 1 /rfelXiIr7u 7 Floor'Ar i 84410 I,- COmMtrc,9/ rmdv r;,1 (/SeS !.S '/0% ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 24 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 14 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.164.060-Lots) CITY OF if6ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 11011-BesIdeottol soopeellooRleooloo Dopertmeot Section • SPECIAL SETBACKS ➢ Streets: feet from the centerline of ➢ Established areas: feet fro ➢ Lower intensity zones: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ Flag lot: 10-fo• -.se yard setback. de Section and 18.961 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half (Yi) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.0201 yD4ve../5/94/..$ c vina4,,?1,-h:.1�Veistfor, oF/7bust PARKING AND ACCE s. 2 w///rc %1C4ea/�'aw Ietek,7 Gv/cvlgkwn c►4-4h:•e ar dcve/�o•,•an�,bpi-&se,•, +6p/9h 4cco,.Ji1,��y e parking for this type of use: / 5P4CL per 3 o a 1 S of .ass r/�ctrce, J/ Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 6 (Jr...,ed I,.P�1 / O *dls r6vfien S4'Y/ S�con arequired parking: /s u er /000 s7/9, of F4 r,.�.s-,, -44rxl,o,.Sc" Parking shown on preliminary plans : a re tied /o/I 2. Pit `9 Ack.c/i o'7 75104,45 rxr'/n d 1'IjOL4se.1644, Esc e vse frd"c.circ` .�;�9 NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 8 inches x 18 feet. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 8 feet x 15 feet. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.0201 Handicapped Parking: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 30' Minimum pavement width: a k/ ' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: N fd (Refute Code Section 18.10 and 18.1081 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Apuncatlon Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 N00--Hesldentlal eIDHcatleo/Haeetn0 Department Section • �IIUA�IIAY REQUIREMENT WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.0501 ADINS AREA REQUIREM CIA fdHdl L OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.010-090) VISION AR requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE AND EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) BOFFERINC AND SCREE-1011 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along e/ ki.e.s 4,,A,m� 74vote,yhv Uses . t , DSCAPI, . ./ TREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100,18.106 and 18.1081 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppDoatlon Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON$Osrneptlel OpplloetleaRlenplp0 Department Sudan SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Section 18.1141 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. (Refer to Code Section 18.841 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report mus •e submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Developmen ode Section 18.84.040.8. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation =nd shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of 18.84.• 0.B.2 and 18.84.040.B.3. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R a 0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve - d maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality nctioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25 EET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except ere approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corri•.r. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated co dor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor tha 's a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except :s allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor in the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average w'.th of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, co ruction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of an ind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protec '•n provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: > A GRAVEL WALK 'Y OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING 8 FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is p- ed, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gra -1 walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary • the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths s :II be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and CITY DEMAND Pre-Appacatlon Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON.BesIdentlel e ppfeetlon/Plenolo0[Manned Seetloa > WATER QUALITY I ,ILITIES may encroach into the vege. -Id corridor a maximum of 10 feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tig-rd Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conserv• ion of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard ocal Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of prop- while . establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and str-:ms; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; m.•► imize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; mainta. and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational alues of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF .TATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Go- 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetla •s and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-baring stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic fee •er second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard include FANNO Cr EK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING :TREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include ummer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tri• taries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED H• -IZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-: NKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian s= •ack is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). • The standard UALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordanc- ith this chapter. ➢ The Mr OR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with is chapter. • I •LATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no iparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.0101 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appncatlon Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 11011.9esldeotlal applleatlon/Planolo0 Department Section Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVE= OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the pl- ent of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that -•ual or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streamban. estoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setb- - area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION e applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the '- e this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation dy required by Section 18.85.050.0 that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cove -ss than 80%of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently c• • -rs less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been re red from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of n. • e plant species; ➢ That t - e will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ T average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.85.100] FREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.0. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.0251 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppIIcatIon Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 1101148esIdeutlel epplleetleo/Pleantn0 DepertmeutSection MmsAno REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: P 9 99 ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070(DI SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION , • • - - o Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision pla •- • request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain a•• :'. 'reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as • • e e until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the Coun i • - ubdivision Name Reservation. [ • I eyor's Office: 648-8884] NARRA he APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32] CODE SECTIONS _ 18.80 _ 18.92 ✓ 18.102 18.116 ✓ 18.150 _ 18.84 _ 18.96 ✓ 18.106 ! 18.120 _ 18.160 18.85 ✓ 18.98 ✓18.108 _ 18.130 _ 18.162 18.88 / 18.10/0 ./18.114 _ 18.134 ./ 18.164 i7 /�/0 .5-An /o.ds ✓ /�l/E s",47,04,-cis CT STUD / As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the.development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the CITY IN MAN Pre-Appticatlon Conference Notes Page 1 019 NON-BasIdenUal applleatIon/PlanoIng Depanmeut Section public at large, public fG .yes systems, and affected private p. _ierty users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.0501 WHEN A CONDITION OF APPROVAL REQUIRES TRANSFER TO THE PUBLIC OF AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.32,Section.2501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING - • _ ° • NT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) GILDING PERMITS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. RECYCLIN pplicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Section 18.1161 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: //I L c e r n r e v,i T- - 7 n•L De s/94 Cheap- /S �Slre,v4"c i1/4,0/1. IoG4L 4 0/ i r `` ESTGIV STANDARDS PoR ALL CRrreAZA &Flo r•G f4rk.-•j T_A9!1 i s .S`)Ot.wf Gv.,/A ns. /ky / /le ceh CITY OF T1GARD Pre-Af wOcatlon Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Oealdeatlal agolleatloa/Plioolag OeDattmeat Section • PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1). 8'h" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard P/q,nr. Commsskovl . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Vanning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: it'/"4 Awe/A1'044_ CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE (5031639-4171 FAX: (5031 684-7297 E-MAIL (staffs first namel@Ci.tigard.or.US MlogIn jiaU t\maiton reeen-e.mst (Engineering Section:masters\Rupp-caug) 5fetfgg CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AoplIcatlon Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NONlesldentlel ugnhleetloo/Plenning Oegutment Seedier PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Aix A. i `i, N ,, . Y p Id.Ore g on men t '=` , ,.,.2-44,,,,,,,;:r4 g , tt! \c 1 �(42 1)17 PUBLIC FACILITIES 4-3Zdo The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( ) to feetrorn--centerline. PI or1, ( ) to feet from centerline. c HA _I/ /t I —liN 1111V( to feet from centerline. • , Q,D; „ . Street improvements: ( = ) `(L street improvements will be necessary along t)...J ( 4_ . ( i-r tr2- street improvements will be necessary along C-,(!J 7 . ( ) Street improvements on 6cit j/.4 shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation f curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. ( -) Street improvements on & 7 shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Engineering Department Section utility wires (a fee y be collected if determined apprc ate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide si` .ialk (sidewalks may be required to wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs and traffic control devices, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. (✓" Section 18.164.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. 1 T re are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Li- ` ( �,.� . Prior to QCCA P , the applicant shall either place these utilitie underground, or pay the fee i -lieu described above. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianways/bike a s: • Sanitary Sewers: (yl-c- The nearest sanitary ewer line to this property is a(n) inch linewwhich it located in L„:1?— ¢ Svc (9l--++"�� . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer.' It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The \pw -, Water District - Phone:(503) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 2 015 Egteeedol Iepantmeot SeaUee Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire ana Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. A downstream analysis will also likely be necessary to determine if runoff from the proposed development will cause adverse impacts to the existing storm system downstream of the site. n- STEP n Ft ], Ft311— 5- A°14.-- AA---- S t rC ° 5-Vt•-'■ ()Q At4.1-1 5 0;2-- isciVrri. 1,444— (3LAL-DiNkl, ) APOt-tc-AT04,J Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( t) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Engineering Department Section • 'TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES • In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of _building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PA1 PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CITY OF TICARD Pre-AupRcatlon Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 Engineering Department Section • Site Improvement :omit (SIT). This permit is gent .y issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DEP MENT ST JhS Phone: [5031 639-4111 Fax [5031684-7291 h.\patty\masters\preapp.eng (Master section.preapp-r.mst) 18-Nov-97 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Al Ilk APPLICATION CHECKLIST1- CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what Is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Tl1q Date: APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENTS) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE .' MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization e' C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies /8 E) Filing Fee $ c 5A [SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS j A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies /' 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10°/u) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds e� 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: I� (a) Floodplain areas (b) Slopes in excess of 25% 0 (c) Unstable ground 0 (d) Areas with high seasonal water table 0 (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential 0 (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 0 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats 0 (b) Wetlands 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings 0 (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0 8. Location of existing structures and their uses II/ 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources e' 10. Location of existing utilities and easements Ir 11. Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways L.NO USE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development roan Indicating: No. of Copies /8 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals e—' 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension t� 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas t� (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation (e) Outdoor common areas sz/ (f) Above ground utilities 8' 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site r� (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped ram 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10. The location of mailboxes 11. The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements a� C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies / The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios 53--- (C) Soil stabilization proposal(s) t— (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ram 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PACE 2 OF 5 • D) Architectural Dra■ :s Indicating: No. of Copies /V The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure Q — 3, +Biid5 MQ4tAls 4 12cuSArd E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /X The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1 . Description of the irrigation system where applicable rcv 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces e' 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions G--- (b) Erosion control measures that will be used r,Y F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preliminary Partition/lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north ar •w and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width and names of streets, easement. -nd other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel a 6. Location of all permanent buildings on . - . within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all water •urses a 8. Location of any trees within •' or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 5% ❑ 10. Location of existin• tilities and utility easements ❑ 11 . For major land , .rtition which creates a public street: (a) The pro•osed right-of-way location and width ❑ (b) A s--led cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any . •plicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evience that land partition will not preclude efficient future land !vision where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION/UST PACE 3 OF 5 I) Subdivision Prelim' Y Plat Map and Data Indicating: No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name of the subdivision 3. Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and designer (as applicable) a 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdivision or names of recorded owners • ' adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2- •ot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the followin (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right-of-ways and easement o (b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer I' es a (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydra ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission line (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses a (f) Deed reservations for parks, open sp. es, pathways and other land encumbrances a 10. Approximate plan and profiles of prop• ed sanitary and storm sewers • with grades and pipe sizes indicated •n the plans ❑ 11 . Plan of the proposed water distribu on system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hy'.rants a 12. Approximate centerline profiles bowing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions fo a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision a 13. Scaled cross sections of p •posed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow a 15. Location, width & dir- ion of flow of all water courses & drainage-ways a 16. The proposed lot co' igurations, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Wh= e lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it sh. be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location o all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above -round level, and the location of proposed tree plantings 0 18. The existin uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the • esent uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to r main after platting a 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) 0 (b Proof of property ownership ❑ ) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements a 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & marsh areas a 21 If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application 0 LAND USE APPLICATION/LIST PAGE 4 OF 3 J) Solar Access Calculations: 0 K) Other Information, No. of Copies o h:Vogmtpanylmasters\k clist.mst Mav 23,1995 rs LANO USE APPUCATION I LIST PAGE i OF S SOURCE ONE NETWORK INC. 15714 SW 72nd Avenue Portland,Oregon 97224 Phone:(503)624-6020 Fax:(503)624-6860 I Date: April 23, 1998 QSL� oo Subject: Preliminary Site Review �J ooh Applicant: Source One Network, Inc. Philip A. Goold 15714 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Phone (503) 624-6020 Dear Julia Hajduk; Thank you for talking with me on the phone recently. I have proceeded as we discussed and now have a completed Sale Agreement in place. The sale is contingent upon being able to obtain preliminary approval from the City of Tigard with regard to my anticipated use of the property and preliminary plan to develop the property. Proposed Use: Source One Network, Inc. is a multinational computer consulting and distribution company. The company began in 1989 doing primarily consulting. For the past 7 years we have also been distributing computer equipment. Our market focus is on fortune 1000 companies. We do not carry any significant inventory (usually less than $5000.00) which eliminates our need for warehouse space. We are able to offer our clients very aggressive pricing by drop shipping from our sources whenever possible and by receiving and re-shipping the goods from our staging area within 24 hours when drop shipment is not an option. Site Plan: I am attaching four layouts, which I believe will give us a starting point of discussion. Page Two Current Owner: Bob Kline 11670 SW 67th Tigard, OR Lot Number: West Portland Heights, Block 7, Lots 1-3, .17 Acres Tax Map: Document is attached Tentative schedule: 4/23/98 Pre-application submitted 4/30/98 Pre-application conference (if at all possible) 5/12/98 Pre-application must be completed 5/14/98 Due diligence period on the Sale Agreement expires 5/15/98 Sign papers to anticipate closing on May 21' 5/22/98 Escrow closes and deed records 5/25/98 Preparation of office space begins. Complete by May 29`h 5/30/98 Vacate current premises 6/1/98 Begin operations in new office. 7/1/98 Begin SDR review process 2/1/99 Begin construction of new facility, Phase 1 8/1/99 Move into new facility 9/1/99 Demolish old facility to clear land for Phase 2 10/1/99 Pave parking areas and complete landscaping anywhere it won't interfere with Phase 2 construction. 2/1/00 Begin construction of new facility, Phase 2 8/1/00 Complete construction of Phase 2 8/1/00 Complete landscaping and any other miscellaneous Thank you for your assistance! Best regards, Philip A. Goold President, Source One Network, Inc. 11670 SW 67th Existing Layout Tigard, OR Lot Size 75'x 100' 112 h— N NI I Garage 11'7 5'2 15'10 7'11 19'8 h— t h 'I ---- Xi - ;n Es' Bedroom#2 Kitchen 1 � I 11111 1 Ousel 1 Closet I 12'8 1 27'8 I d. Bedroom#1 Living Room c 11'1 217 482 4... — -- 11670 SW 67th Existing Layout Including Street and Tigard, OR Driveway Information •J¢e75'x 100' I 117 E . Garage 117 57 1510 711 WM # I h 7 'r - • r. Bedroom 02 ,�„ IGrcnen Existing Driveway f =` r' Bedroom 01 wog Room Baylor { Street ' 11'1 217 i 4e7 32.4 p IExisting Driveway D 67th Avenue 7 11670 SW 67th Proposed Layout, 2 Tigard, OR Phases Lot Size 75 x 100' Phase 1 Structure 35 x 40' ,r¢1 7d P �y no x z = 2ga o 0 [8eomri Kitchen • ni �r Closet Closet _. - 1 Bedroom#' Living Room Phase 2 Structure 24 x 65 100'4 11670 SW 67th Proposed Layout At Completion Tigard, OR Lot Size 75'x 100' Reception Area,270 S Phase 1 Structure 35' x 4 ' Phase 1,2 Levels,2,800 SF Primary Office Space, 1,400 SF, 2nd Level To sec:cue u/3 ¢oks Receiving Area 1,130 SF ek n07"eicq/� Slo. qc 35'2 Q Ln 4. Phase 2 Structure 24 x 65 Phase 2,2 Levels,3,120 SF N 65'2 =CZ TITLE INSURANCE .bla map 4 made solely tot the PORN of eSalatir g In locating said premise, , rho Company .sumes no Uablllty for vartattions,tt any,in dimensions;and location ascertained by actual survey, MAP NO. / , /IX) ' $ eeet b .« gTL.ANTN, .,.. rr. w Ti / t •—• .�r�t ,1 .rr, t4 II 1r W 4 � tr 1yi, ;?•••' �•a t��#�1> 1< .}w. �3 } u ><� � / � 1 L{ �a 1 Q 12° 1 y a - 1� 9�a �;� n • to ' w ! 4 19 cis T 1400 • ,! , iQl av•s4 t wit ltd t 1 'R 1! •. ' h 400 .1:444 .�s.N• k 11 M r OpSt 1 Wig. f .I/ (Q ri '"I:o 1 • • b 11 {� r {1 a K e BAYLOR T��' N STREET, '*WiWt•161'984 t lir i juiu IT'w lrri1 W' r t i 117 NIP. a ' '' 512t r �6 T /1922 3 Mit 7 V I till 36 . ADAR ,r 1 b J1i¢ 30 % • 4w....JiR.r� r J 11 "°° y`1 7 II },.b4 Y 1 tZ3 vr� * % y it » i� 16 li I. IS st % ro ,.. a 11 a . l.µ N i1 >c Y •r00 t,�;t 1R ,t} a 10� a a i ../.M1 av x s• U le nt h 1d 1�.�L ka W t• Q, S001 4 IT 1403 11 • IT 2s >, .i as aoeet t,? Is J1.a b ` Is I 11 T 'T T T T T 1 l 1 II ! ', ' +" r 7 D. ' 00 34 I g{ T . - ,4 t. 1 4 J. ii 4 J. J. J L.. CL.1 TON STREET', "'U"O.*Pit"t r r r r T T T T T 1 r t=•• ,, 4 0 V 7 3 4 ` . i.y ...A l 1414.174 .f {4_1 1 L / • ti t. 4 J. J. { J. 4 ; 1 1 �'* ♦ ill q�,• woo >i v. + 4 11 {1T N 11 j 54 i 1-• « $101144144 4 1, a �, It NYHN 9 f ` '1 k i I' up. } ♦ 4 M US/4? ♦ el,44VW M t 0 T -i h t 4 I. ~ SOU, 4 • ♦ .4 4840 •4 SW T rT 4 V 5 p 2,0 00- 00003 Page 1 of 1 I have signed off on conditions 2, 5-7 and 9. Conditions 1, 3, 4 and 8 must be met before I can give the go ahead from planning for issuance of permits. Condition#8 is the tree mitigation fee. Based on the estimate that they provided, they must pay$5,168. Julia Hajduk Associate Planner (503)639-4171 x 407 juliaci.tigard.or.us www.ci.tigard.or.us file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GW}00001.HTM 08/23/2000 ATE OF OREGON RETRUN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: County of Washington SS CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT, I, Jerry OF TIGARD ry • -t1 ��f: . of Assess- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ment and t.rw q z; , ;spry.' o County Clerk for ~., �7 Tigard,OR 97223 the wit �� t' `;. !"��^ ' rtify that � b�'`received and re+-�n:: n;. �,, a%:,.. q JNDIV1DUAL county ,J',of said * ** p.y1"\ tta-414110gx,cjit 1.‘ Zooc� — oc �g Sy l T *- "a c,u ctor of File No. �f �' �t1c'{Taxation, Ex- i •`_= ytilerk Doc : 2000083129 DEDICATION DEED Rect: 264866 32. 00 10/12/2000 02: 43:05pm FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES (n� Space above reserved for Washington County Recording information. r � `Q P t O 0 )A L�eCCC� GO � �� does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road, and utility purposes on, over,across, under, along, and within the following described real propety in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit "A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this day of 20 60 PA_ ( WIC C Qr )19-d-01 Signature Signature yl Ch0.-ck', 11 i)owIv , Tax Statement Mailing Address Mailing Address l.(\ ke Osw FICA C) 7035 L,o.Y,e osw�< o CR STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) / This instrument was acknowledged before me on///oc, (date)by:�r1 I /i p ( c)/c( (name of person(s)). fl"V� OFFICIAL SEAL ` -/7GL((-Zit C/ `i�k �r #�a MARGARET A VAN FOSSAN Notary / atureYY sir-- r NOTARY PUBLIC- OREGON 1 COMMISSION NO. 3pc'195 ii�� �h :it MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC.21.2001 1' My Commission Expires: IJIuP_- ..2t of'L / m -,.Ca. Joe /yYI//YI/:.1 $'- Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this Zl day of, 5 er '"'}°`V 20 e 0 . City Engineer 1 - 3 I'ENG'PUB.FORM\ROWOE-IN DOT Weddle & Associates, Inc. Professional Land Surveyors 1750 S.W.Skyline Blvd.,Suite 105 Portland,Oregon 97221 4400 LE4 Ess,oNa,� OFFICE(503)292-8083 - TOLL FREE(888)222-8083 c �a FAX (503)292-0938 H 1••-EGO .9J," V OPS\4G rOClATES August 22, 2000 Job No. 3112DED STREET DEDICATION EXHIBIT"A" A tract of land for street dedication purposes in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 7, WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS, a duly recorded subdivision in Washington County, said Northwest corner of Lot 1 bears North 89°59'55" East, 30.00 feet and South 00°00'00" West, 30.00 feet from the centerline intersection of S.W. Baylor Street, 60.00 feet wide, with S.W. 67th Avenue, 60.00 feet wide; thence along the North line of said Lot 1 North 89°59'55' East, 3.75 feet; thence leaving said North line South 44°59'58" West, 5.30 feet to the West line of said Lot 1; thence along said West line North 00°00'00" East, 3.75 feet to the point of beginning. Containing therein 7 square feet. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL • D SURVEYOR,,. ANNE e•EGON Y 11.2000 GARY W.CHEEL 42649 EXPIRES DEC. 31, 2001 C)•-■ V EXHIBIT " B " 1 STREET DEDICATION b SE 1 /4 SEC. 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M. City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon N 89°59'55"E 30.00' I CENTERLINE I S .W. BAYLOR ST. 3 o (o 0 0 400Lf* M 0` 10 I O NI lk:54 (i) 0,,� 5 4VEYO G' °OA ,` P.O.B. IN 89°59'55"E 3.75' SCALE: I N 89°59'55"E 1" = 10' W N 00°00'00"E ` 25.00' 25.00' 8/22/00 > 3.75' ■ S 44°59'58"W 1 2 5.30' w z _C w Li- Z Z CD O W b U 0 °oo !� oo DOC. NO. 98053623 zl 0 00 (I) o 0 ° 30' 30' z WEST POR LAND HEIGTS BLK . 7 4445 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TEL: 503.226.1 285 FAX: 503.226.1 670 E-MAIL: cida @teleport.com RECEIVED August 7, 2000 OCT 2 4 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tigard Planning Department Attn.: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Source One Network City File SDR2000-00008 CIDA Project Number. 98075.10 Dear Julia: Enclosed is a response to conditions of approval as part of the Site Development Review for Source One Network at 11670 SW 67th Avenue. Revisions have been submitted as part of the Building Permit package are concurrent with items listed on the "conditions of approval" in the Notice of Type II Decision, dated June 6, 2000. Conditions of Approval, as included in the Notice of Decision, are met as follows: 1. The sidewalk is noted as concrete on the Site Plan, Keynote 3. 2. One more street tree has been added along SW 67th and three more street trees have been added along Baylor. The tree species has been changed due to the lack of availability of caliper sizes at this time. 3. Enclosed is a letter from Lenny Hing, of Pride Disposal Co., verifying that the location for trash receptacles meets the needs of the trash hauler. 4. Trash receptacles will be stored inside of the building, as presently done, and taken to the curb for curbside pick-up by the trash hauler. See enclosed letter from Pride Disposal Co. 5. Wheelstops are noted on the Site Plan, Keynote 23. 6. A bicycle rack to accommodate two bicycle parking spaces is noted on the Site Plan, Keynote 22. 7. Details of the bicycle rack are noted on the Site Details, Detail 4. 8. The tree mitigation fee in lieu has been changed to reflect mitigation for 56 inches, per our telephone conversation on July 25, 2000. The fee in lieu is noted on the Landscape Plan, and will be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. Revised building elevations show more than 50% window coverage on the ground floor of the street-facing facade. See Exterior Elevations sheet, north elevation. 10. Five sets of public improvement plans will be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. F:\GENADMI N\PROJECTS\98\98075\8-4-00_gov.doc ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • INTERIORS • LANDSCAPE Source One Network August 7.2000 Page 2 I. The Engineering Department has been provided with the legal name, address and telephone number of the property owner. 12. An addressing fee for$30.00 will be paid prior to the issuance of the site permit. 3. The additional triangular one foot of right-of-way will be dedicated at the corner of SW 67'h Avenue and SW Baylor prior to issuance of the building permit. 14. Construction plans indicate the construction of the half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 67t Avenue. Construction will meet City standards. 15. Proposed street trees along SW Baylor and SW 67th Avenue are noted on the Landscape Plan. 16. The proposed 6-inch public sanitary sewer line to be constructed is noted on both the Utility Plan as well as the public improvement plans. 17. An Erosion Control Plan was submitted as part of the public improvement plans. 18. A strip drain is noted on the Site Plan, Keynote 26. 19. The applicant will pay the fee in lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20. The public improvements as related to this project will be completed and conditionally accepted by the City prior to final building inspection. 21. Mylar and diskette as-builts of the public improvements will be provided to the City prior to final building inspection. 22. The utility provider has been contacted and will determine whether or not overhead lines may be relocated underground. The applicant will either have the lines relocated underground or will pay the fee in lieu prior to a final building inspection. 23. Drawings are enclosed for final plan approval by the Planning Department. This package meets applicable Development Code criteria raised within the Notice of Decision. Please call if you have questions or need further information. Sincerely, flik(4AAAAMMAX Lauri L'Amoreaux Planner /LLD Enclosures C: Philip Goold,Source One Network Brian White, Lans Stout,CIDA File F:\GENADMIN\PROJECTS198198075\8-4-O0gov.doc JUL-Id-Z000 14:12 P.KUM-LIUA 13082261670 1-415 P.002/002 F-2b5 A C 67 , r....ic.„ , , s w e7P1 .vE. r 0 — — ---- — ---1- - --1-7,...... v . 7\ s- i c" ,-; ,, . , _._ , k- r' IIK 5. ) • 111111111111O Mb,�; -__. .-- _ate. � � i.-- 1° r. 1 I i I M 13.-T` if.217 1 G TC Oft 1 42' IP--j. CP 6. .. �' .- * - 42-' r RI 111111111111 C) a la i "I k r„ I� ,J i ``� O'Vil - i II— ∎ - 7- I II. L ' b g b II mar 1 ' I k c a c 1 t_ � X Os- 4_, 1 eettem cepirrDezeamczczsseeoeTTO it i Iii 1 0-4039°- i iig a eleii1 1 Ili 1i it € 3!9 , pilaf �� 1 ;1A ,i � 1 � 1 Si � I1! x i �'` l ,Iai i i i 1 : 1 iii a ii d I 11 r a _ *v, r_r, SOURCE ONE NETWORK ;/J :•r S)'•1 I J I I ... i I LI " �• •RO. OREGON C00/COOP 'IPSOcTSICI 3QI2Id RLTQ ,..A Cncp ac:cT nn aT; in NOV-01-2000 11:02 FROM-CIDA 15032261670 1-871 P.001/003 F-082 :4445 SW BARBUR BLVD., SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 TEL:(503)226-1285 FAX:(503)226-1670 TOLL FREE:(888)226-1285 E-MAIL:ciaa@teleport.com FAX COVER LETTER PROJECT NO.: _ C q l U40 DATE: 16— w0 PROJECT NAME: Sowv(;, OV14 N t TYtr TIME:. ATTN: J1AAA A FAX#: (vim"- 72q7 COMPANY: G / /tJl,1I1 DESCRIPTION: O V FROM: U •i ( DTRAA/4 FAX#:(503)226-1670 PAGE OF (INCLUDING COVER LETTER) COMMENTS: cc: Fax: is (0244-6400 O Q LI ORIGINALS TO FOLLOW ❑ ORIGINALS NOT TO FOLLOW CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this fax is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above if the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or if this transmission was received in error,pkase notify us immediately sir(503)226-1281 ARC_I-tI 1 kC:TURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • INTERIORS • LANDSCAPE NOV-01-2000 11 :03 FROM-CI DA 15032261670 T-871 P 002/003 F-082 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 2000 SUBJECT: Trash receptacle location PROJECT TITLE: Source One Network,Inc. City File: SDR2000-00008 BY: Philip Goold, President Source One Network, Inc. TO: City of Tigard Ann: Julia Hajduk 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Fax No.: (503)684-7297 This memo is in response to Condition of Approval number 4 of the Notice of Decision for the above mentioned project. It has been brought to my attention that you request additional information in regards to garbage storage and disposal on the property. Currently, we collect solid waste in a 50 gallon trash can supplied to us by the Garbage Collection Provider, Pride Disposal Company. Another 50 gallon trash can is used for paper recycle. These trash receptacles are kept inside the garage of my current facility and brought by us to the curb on trash collection day, as approved by Pride Disposal. Cardboard is collected in a dumpster which is also stored in the garage and brought to the curb on trash collection day. Recyclables and cardboard are also picked up on trash collection day. The same process will take place for the future facility, as approved by Pride Disposal (see attached note). The trash receptacles and cardboard dumpster will be kept in a corner of the warehouse portion of the new building, near the roll up door,to be brought to the curb on trash collection day. cc: Lauri L'Amoreaux,CIDA Lans Stout,CODA Brun White,CIDA File \\t iI seMacImin\GENADMiN\PROjECTS198\98075\I 0-27-00.gov.mem.doc • JLL-1-[UUu Id:It NKUM-UIUA maez8IBT0 T-412 P.DGZ/E472 F-162 A - a ric,(/‘ 7. C S w 8n 4 ave. 0 - _ - ........ , --I 4 .1,7 c,:aimini 0 - _- jt•I,:• — i h --- --°'�-`I 11 ._ A L_____ 0. .:: , 6 IF-' \\‘'9- di �; U, - C 2 0 _ '1, If" .* - K' 7CN ,2 Allalle t •- - ; 1. GI . • - i ! (71 —.1 8.7(1 VI .--9 - L�...�.� f�- �.�.rte ...J -. . ...Ii - v ..� 1SRCmt Imp ® . ` 1 c. 4.'. ■ 1 i . E o®soID ©©vvDcz>mmalOOOOOao©o i ii a ll k giiiiiii:i ¢ iiia : Ftii fi1 � te6E Illil i iiii : II ! l'i i iliiiiiill ill sCrlilit f w ■ ag { 1 1 Oil si INb ;11 "gll is r I Ill 1 1 S VI 9 1 igl ON a Ali fi i ii I i e 11 N it ;1�_ A S4.17' �— - � .- : SOURCE ONE NETWORK ' . - .o :,v S>-.t 7 I IA :.' I T !D, OREGON Z80-d 800/E00 d 118-1 0l919ZZE091 VGI0-IMOd EO: II 000Z-10-AON Receipt #: 27200000000000001461 fi,. /.0I—... Date: 12/01/2000 T I D E M A R K COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. nount Due SDR2000-00008 [MSC] Misc Fee 100-0000-451000 $5,168.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Confirm No. Amount Paid Check SOURCE ONE NETWORK, INC. 0 338 $5,168.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $5,168.00 PLANTING KEY QUANTITY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COMMENTS TREES 4 AG ACER GRISEUM PAPER BARK MAPLE 2 1/2" CAL. B&B 8 PCC PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER' CHANTICLEER CALLERY PEAR 3 1/2 CAL. B&B 1 QFS QUERCUS FRAINETTO 'SCHMIDT' FOREST GREEN OAK 2 1/2" CAL. B&B SHRUBS 6 ADV AZALEA 'DELAWARE VALLEY' -- 2 GAL. 4 BRG BERBERIS THUNBERGII ATRO. 'ROSE GLOW' ROSE GLOW RED BARBERRY 5 GAL. 5 EFS EUONYMUS FORTUNEI 'SARCOXIE' SARCOXIE EUONYMUS 2 GAL. 29 EEG EUONYMUS FORTUNEI 'EMERALD GAIETY' EMERALD GAIETY EUONYMUS 5 GAL. 5 FH FUCHSIA HYBRIDA HARDY HYBRID FUCHSIA 2 GAL. 5 HH HEMEROCALLIS DAYLILY 1 GAL. 14 LA LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA ENGLISH LAVENDER 1 GAL. 5 RSW RHODODENDRON 'SCARLET WONDER' -- 2 GAL. 3 VD VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAVID VIBURNUM 2 GAL. 4 PJ PIERIS JAPONICA JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL. GROUND COVER P4' AUU ARCTOSTAPHLOS UVA-URSI 'VANCOUVER JADE' KINNIKINNICK 1 GAL. PLANT, 30" O.C. ►� , CD COTONEASTER DAMMIERI 'EICHHOLZ' EICHHOLZ COTONEASTER 1 GAL. PLANT, 30" O.C. /// 22 -1 EFC EUONYMUS FORTUNEI 'COLORATA' PURPLE LEAF WINTERCREEPER 1 GAL. PLANT, 30" O.C. 36 GENERAL NOTES ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN IN-GROUND, FULLY AUTOMATIC SYSTEM. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY APPROVE PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO AVAILABILTY CHANGE OF SPECIFIED PLANTS APPROVED BY DESIGN REVIEW. ALL SUBSTITUTED PLANTS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE SIZE AND GENERAL QUALITY OF THOSE ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED. RECEIVED SEE SEPARATE PUBLIC IMRPOVEMENT PLANS BY CIDA, INC. FOR WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. CURB, DRIVEWAY, AND SIDEWALK WITHIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY C�i ' 1 2000 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. GRADES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONSTRUCTION OF THESE FEATURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT PLANS. SDC3606 -Coang2 TREE PLAN ALL EXISTING ON-SITE TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED: 18" OAK TO BE REMOVED 2-14" OAK TO BE REMOVED 24" OAK TO BE REMOVED 70" TOTAL CALIP. OF TREES TO BE REMOVED ON-SITE TREE MITIGATION PLANS: 12 TREES TO BE ADDED TO THE SITE -- 14" CALIPER INCHES FOR MITIGATION. 8 STREET TREES AT 3 1/2" CAL. EACH = 12" CALIP. 4 SITE TREES +sue 2 1/2" CAL. EACH = 2" CALIP. BALANCE OF MITIGATION TO BE BY "FEE IN LIEU" FOR REMAINING 56". REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED: REMAINING CALIPER INCHES OF TREES REMOVED _ 56" - 16 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED CALIPER SIZE OF AVAILABLE REPLACEMENT TREES 3.5" *16 - 3.5" CALIPER TREES © $323.00 PER TREE = $5168.00 TO BE PAID "FEE IN LIEU." *TREE PRICE BASED ON 1999-2000 TEUFEL NURSERY CATALOG PRICE FOR A 3.5" CALIPER PYRUS CALLERYANA. LIGHTING KEYNOTES O400 WATT METAL HALIDE WALL MOUNTED LIGHTING. MOUNTED AT 18 FEET. MANUFACTURED BY LITHONIA. HI-TEK LIGHTING STYLE. -- CENTER IN DORMER ABOVE OPENING. 1125/O Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00008 11:42:39 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 WALKWAY PAVED 0 Met 10/26/00 JPH 10/26/00 JPH 1. Submit a revised plan that confirms the walkway will be paved with a hard surface such as concrete,asphalt,stone or brick. 0001 TREES 0 Met 8/23/00 JPH 8/23/00 JPH 2. Submit a revised plan that provides one more tree along SW 67th(for a total of 3)and 3 more trees along SW Baylor (for a total of 5)spaced no more than 15 feet apart or revise the proposed trees toa large stature tree. 0001 TRASH ENCLOSURE 0 Met 11/6/00 JPH 11/6/00 JPH 3. Submit verification from the franchise waste hauler indicating that the location of the proposed trash enclosure meets their needs. 0001 REFUSE CONTAINER 0 Met 11/6/00 JPH 11/6/00 JPH 4. Submit details(size, location,etc.)of the refuse container or storage location for Staff to confirm that the standards of Section 18.755.050 have been met. If the location is to be outside of the proposed building,the enclosure must be screened in accordance with the landscaping standards of Section 18.745.050.E.4. 0001 WHEEL STOPS 0 Met 8/23/00 JPH 8/23/00 JPH 5. Submit a revised plan that shows wheel stops will be installed where the parking spaces abut landscaping or walkways. 0001 BICYCLE RACK 0 Met 8/23/00 JPH 8/23/00 JPH 6. Submit a revised plan that shows a bicycle rack,accommodating 2 bicycle parking spaces will be located on the site in accordance with the siting standards for Section 18.765.050. 0001 BICYCLE RACK DETAILS 0 Met 8/23/00 JPH 8/23/00 JPH 7. Submit details of the bicycle rack to be used. 0001 TREE MITIGATION FEE 0 Met 12/1/00 JPH 12/1/00 JPH 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, pay the tree mitigation fee in-lieu for 54 inches. The fee in-lieu cost is based on an estimate of the cost to purchase and plant the same number of inches on-site. Mitigation is based on a 2-inch tree or larger. 0001 REVISED ELEVATION PLANS 0 Met 8/23/00 JPH 8/23/00 JPH 9. Submit a revised elevations plan that shows the 50%window requirement will be met. 0010 BLDG PERMIT ISSUANCE REQ'RMNTS 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and comcpliance agreement is required for this project. Five(5)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to Cot of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's age(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met) BR 6/23/00 ST 11. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,t £ngineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 12/5/00 BDR 12/5/00 BDR 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30. 0001 ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 Met 9/21/00 BR 12/1/00 BDR 13. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public at the corner of SW 67th Avenue and SW Baylor Street to provide enough right-of-way to fit a City standard wheel chair ramp at the corner. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerlines. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Page 1 of 2 1/25/01 ' " Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2000-00008 11:42:39 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0091 STREET STANDARD IMPROVEMENTS REAR 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 14. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 67th Avenue. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include:A. City standard pavement section for a local service street from curb to centerline equal to 17 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage;C. concrete curb,or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. six(6)-foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TTDS requirements;G. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; H. underground utilities; I. street signs;J. driveway apron;and K. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW 67th Avenue in a safe manner,as approved by the Engineering Department. 0001 STREET TREES 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 15. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will install street trees along the frontage of SW Baylor Street. 0001 PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 16. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will constrcut a new 6-inch public sanitary sewer line from the existing manhole in SW 67th Avenue(south of the site)northeasterly to the southwest corner of the site. At that point, a cleanout can be installed to facilitate the necessary private sewer service line to the adjacent property to the east. 0001 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 17. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans-Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994". 0001 STRIP DRAIN 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 18. The applicant's construction plans shall indicate that they will install a strip drain with a grate along the edges of their sidewalk adjacent to SW Baylor Street. In addition,an 18-inch wide river rock strip shall be installed on the uphill-side of the strip drain. 0031 FEE IN-LIEU/ON-SITE H2O QUAL FAC 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 19. Prior to issuance of the building permit,the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site water quality facility. The fee is based on the total area of new impervious surfaces in the proposed development and is currently$210 for every 2,640 sf of new impervious surfaces. The final fee will be calculated by the Commercial Plans Examiner. 0008 BLDG FINAL REQ'R P-IMP COMPLETION 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 20. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete the required public improvements,obtain conditional acceptance from the City and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 0005 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS OF P-IMP PRVD'D 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 21. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1)mylars;and 2)a diskette of the as-builts in"DWG"format, if available;otherwise"DXF"will be acceptable. NOTE: If the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn,then a diskette is not required. 0105 UTILITIES(EXISTNG)UNDERGRND/PAY 0 Not Met BR 6/23/00 ST 22. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 67th Avenue underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,it will be$2,750 and shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 0076 SITE IMP PLANS(REVISED)INCLUDE: 0 Not Met JPH 6/23/00 ST 23. Install all site improvements as per the final plans approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division. If any changes are necessary to any aspect of the site plans(landscaping,parking layout,etc.)approval must be obtained from the Planning Division even if the change is required by another City Department. Failure of the applicant to obtain approval will delay inspections until formal approval can be granted and may result in significant site changes necessary to rememdy the situation. Page 2 of 2 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: SDR 2000-00008 LAND USE FILE Oti FROM: MORGAN TRACY,ASSOCIATE PLANNER MATT HARRELL,ENGINEERING TECH II SUBJECT: APPROVED LOCATION OF STREET TREES DATE: 01/11/02 CC: The final location of street trees in this project was modified from the approved construction plans due to conflicts with other utilities and required site improvements. This did not affect the number, size, or type of trees planted. As no specific condition of approval was impacted by this relocation,nor the quantity of trees reduced,no further modification or plan drawings were required.