The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2000-00011 SDR2000 - 00011 AT &T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00011 CITY TIGARD AND SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 CommunityFDeve(opment AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/7/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review—Type II (SDR) SDR2000-00011 Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay (SLR) SLR2000-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following land use applications: 1. A secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. 2. Determination of Sensitive Lands and Water Resource Overlay Review. APPLICANT: Fraley/Stricker Architects OWNERS: BHK Propertie§, LLC. 120 Lakeside 14280 SW 72" Avenue Seattle, WA 99122 Tigard, OR 97224 Attn: David DeVoist COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VII. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006—AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE BRIAN RAGER, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (503) 639-4171.) Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Fox, 639-4171, ext. 315) for review and approval: 1 . The applicant shall provide the percent of existing landscaping on the site, and percent of proposed new landscaping to meet the 25% landscape requirement on the easement area. Alternatively, the applicant shall verify in the landscape plan, that 25% landscaping already exists on Tax Lot 800, the parent parcel. The applicant shall submit the revised landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence and a sufficiently detailed description of the use to fully address Chapter 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards. 3. The applicant shall revise plans to incorporate specifications as follows: All topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the site and lprotected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be ocated where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a minimum trash enclosure of 11 square feet, and specify which method of collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables they will use. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a letter of explanation for approval by the Planning Division describing the on-site storage anticipated and how it will dispose of any stored waste. 5. In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the dimensions of the parking space, which shall be no less than the minimum size of one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate that the access drive shall be improved with asphalt or concrete. The applicant shall indicate on the plans the striping of parking space(s), directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. 6. In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.790, a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper; it shall indicate which trees are to be removed, a protection program defining standards, and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant shall contact the consulting arborist if the contractor needs to work within the root zone areas of the trees to be retained. 7. The applicant shall revise the site plan and depict a 30-foot visual clearance triangle at the driveway to the street adjacent to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795 and Figure18.795.1. Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site. In no case shall tree branches obstruct the area of visual clearance, and all branches shall be removed below eight feet in the triangular area 30 feet on either side of the access in accordance with Chapter 18.795. In addition, all landscaping, except trees, in the area of visual clearance shall not exceed three feet in height from the top of curb. 8. The property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). The applicant shall submit any revisions to the location of the proposed fence for approval by the Planning Division and the Utility Manager. 9. The applicant's Engineer shall verify that there is no ground slumping or sliding. 10. The applicant shall provide an impact study as set forth in TDC Section 18.390.040.B.e for approval by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 2 OF 19 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information and Proposal Description: TCI Cable has an easement containing .03 acres on this site which is owned by BHK Properties, LLC. The approximate 1 ,200 square foot project area is located on the southeastern portion of 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800, which is .96 acres in size. The subject Tax Lot 800 is partially paved with an access just to the north of the easement area which serves the Huntair industrial business on this parent parcel. There are no buildings or structures currently on the easement. There are designated wetlands mapped on the southern portion of the site and floodplain mapped on the western portion of the site on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. However, the applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination finding that there are no wetlands which exist within 50 feet of the subject easement/project area. The southern boundary of the property is bordered by various trees. The proposal is to located a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. This aboveground vault has a 6-foot x 10-foot footprint and will site with a 60-foot x 20-foot easement (approximately). The vault is proposed to be located outside of the 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74 Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4'-8" in length x 7' x 5' feet in depth. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback, but is not included in this application. The site slopes gently to the southwest toward the confluence of Fanno and Ball Creek off-site. Vicinity Information: The easement site is located west of 74th Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad and south of Bonita Road. Ball Creek and a riparian forest is located approximately 75 feet to the south, and Fanno Creek and is approximately 200 feet to the west of the subject easement area. The confluence of the two streams and the 50-foot riparian setback is located on the adjacent property to the southwest of the easement area. To the north pf the subject site is Huntair, an industrial property, zoned Industrial Park. To the east of the site is 74 Avenue; and beyond that is property zoned Light Industrial and the Southern Pacific Railroad. To the south of the site is a recently constructed, fenced graveled parking lot with a paved approach on the northeast portion of the adjacent lot. To the west of the site is a portion of the Huntair property and Fanno Creek. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a utility vault. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Other — Rail Lines/Utility Corridors. The site is located within the Industrial Park District. Table 18.530.1 lists Rail Lines/Utility Corridors as a permitted use in the I-P zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. The Type II procedure applies to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Officer. The Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay District Review is a Type I review as no construction is proposed within the 50-foot riparian setback, and less than 50 cubic yards of material are proposed to be disturbed within the 100-year floodplain. The Type I review is incorporated into this Type II decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 3 OF 19 Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision making procedures. A Type II procedure applies to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Officer. Type I procedures apply to ministerial permits and actions, containing clear and objective approval criteria, and are decided by the Director without public notice. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from surrounding property owners. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resource Overlay District) Land Use Decisions C. 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) p D. 18.390 (Im act Study Section 18.390.040) E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters:18.715 (Density Computations), 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.780 (Signs), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. Development Standards: Section 18.530.2 States that Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 4 OF 19 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P I-L I-H Minimum Lot Size None None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. - Side facing street on corner & through lots [1] 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- -- Maximum Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. - Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75% [5] 85% 85% Maximum Landscape Requirement 25% [6] 15% 15% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance) must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the site development review process. Tax Lot 800 is approximately .96 acres, and the easement project area is approximately .03 acres within Tax Lot 800, or 1,200 square feet. Proposed structure footprint area is 60 square feet. Tax Lot 800 has a width of 167.80 feet exceeding the minimum 50-foot width requirement. There is no minimum lot size. The above-ground utility vault is located approximately 50 feet from the front property line and, therefore, meets the front yard setback requirement of 35 feet. The required side and rear and setbacks are zero feet as the property does not abut residential property. The height of the structure is 5'-8" above grade, which is well below the 45 feet maximum height allowed by Code. The Minimum landscape requirement is 25%, except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the site development review process. The applicant has not provided information pertaining to the percent of landscaping provided on the site, only that the existing trees will be retained. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall provide the percent of existing landscaping on the site, and percent of proposed new landscaping to meet the 25% landscape requirement on the easement area. Alternatively, the applicant shall verify in the landscape plan, that 25% landscaping already exists on Tax Lot 800, the parent parcel. The applicant shall submit the revised landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development .Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 5 OF 19 The applicable Community Development Code (CDC) criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VII. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the Community Development Code: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Applicability of Provisions: Section 18.705.020 The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. This development involves the construction of a new structure, therefore, the provisions of this Chapter are applicable. Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; This requirement is not applicable as this use is classified as a Utility Corridor (communication line), and not a commercial, institutional or industrial use. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; This criteria is not applicable as the property is not in residential use of any kind. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways are proposed or required, therefore, this criteria is not applicable. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. No walkways are proposed or required, therefore, this criteria is not applicable. FINDING: The standard has been met as no walkways are proposed or required. Minimum Access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 6 OF 19 • There is an existing driveway which is 35'-5" wide just north of the easement area which can serve as access to this hub facility. FINDING: The existing entry access is adequate to serve the facility. This standard is met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The telecom use poses no known noise, visible emissions, vibration or odors known to Staff that would be atypical for Industrial Park District. The applicant, however, has not provided specific information in its narrative application addressing this standard. This standard is applicable at all times in the future. FINDING: This standard is not met, as the applicant does not address it, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall submit evidence and a sufficiently detailed description of the use to fully address Chapter 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. There is approximately 189 feet of frontage along Tax Lot 800 and 74th Avenue, however, there is only 20 feet of frontage along the easement/project area which contains this use. Therefore, this standard is not applicable as proposed development is limited to the easement area. In addition, existing trees will be retained on site providing greenery close to the street. FINDING: This standard is not applicable to this development project which is contained in an easement with frontage of less than 100 feet. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this Chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The proposed use, Utility Corridor/communication lines is a different use than the surrounding industrial uses. The proposed use type is not specifically listed in Table 18.745.1. As this type of proposed use has minimal impact on the surrounding industrial uses, and generally has less impact than surrounding uses. Therefore, no buffer is required. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. Buffering and Screening is addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4)- foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years of planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 7 OF 19 portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant proposes to screen the entire perimeter of the site with a 6'-0" chain link fabric fence with vinyl slats. Existing screening is also provided via trees along the south boundary of the property and the riparian forested area along Ball and Fanno Creek on the adjacent property to the south. The riparian forest also wraps around the subject site's western boundary. No additional screening is required. FINDING: This standard is met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There is one parkin space proposed on site. As the applicant proposes to screen the entire perimeter of the site with a 6 -0' chain link fabric fence with vinyl slats, the parking area will be screened from view. The parking area is also screened from view by existing trees to the south and one existing tree to the southeast and east. In addition, the property owners to the south have constructed a tall site-obscuring fence (cyclone fence with wooden slats), therefore, the parking area will virtually not be visible, except from the Huntair property on the parent parcel. There is an existing tree on the site adjacent to and east of the parking area which is proposed to be retained. FINDING: This standard is met. Re-vegetation: Section 18.745.060 Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. The applicant has not addressed this criteria. FINDING: This criteria has not been fully been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition during grading and construction, then the criteria shall be satisfied: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise plans to incorporate specifications as follows: All topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the site and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 8 OF 19 will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Minimum standards method, Section 18.755.040.C5.b (2) states that non-residential buildings shall provide shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus for other: 4 square feet 11000 square feet GFA. The applicant does not address this criteria. The proposed concrete structure will house only communication transport equipment, and will not house people. The applicant shall clarify whether there will be any on site storage of waste or recyclables. Typically, a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus 4 square feet/1000 square feet GFA is required. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, if the applicant meets the condition listed below this standard will be met: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a minimum trash enclosure of 11 square feet, and specify which method of collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables they will use. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a letter of explanation for approval by the Planning Division describing the on-site storage anticipated and how it will dispose of any stored waste. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; The access drive is addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; The access drive is part of an existing loop drive, which also serves the Huntair business located to the north on the parent parcel. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and The existing loop access drive for Huntair and the parent parcel is paved with asphalt. The applicant's plan indicates a shared access (on the same parcel) with the Huntair business to the north. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. This criterion is not applicable as there is only one parking space proposed. Pedestrian Access: Section 18.765.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-000 1 1/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 9 OF 19 Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This criterion is addressed under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. In addition, there are no drop-off grade separations, therefore, this portion of the standard is not applicable. Parking Lot Landscaping: Section 18.765.040.G Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.745 in this decision. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; It is unclear from the applicant's plans whether or not the parking space is proposed to be paved. The parking space, and access drive to it, shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfacing. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. This is a non-residential development, therefore, this criterion is applicable and shall be met through striping of parking spaces, directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The single parking space within the project area/easement is not along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped area or sidewalk, therefore, no wheel stop is required. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. No lighting plan was submitted by the applicant. As there are no adjacent residential zones, this criterion is not applicable. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. No signage plans or elevations were submitted with this application. The applicant shall submit plans and elevations for signage, if any is proposed, to the Planning Division under a separate land use application. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 10 OF 19 • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant proposed a single parking space with dimensions 6.75 feet x 13.5 feet which is inadequate in size to meet the standards. The parking space shall meet the minimum size for one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. FINDING: The General Provisions for Off-Street Parking and Loading requirements have not been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the standard will be met: CONDITION: In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the dimensions of the parking space, which shall be no less than the minimum size of one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate that the access drive shall be improved with asphalt or concrete. The applicant shall indicate on the plans the striping of parking space(s), directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The minimum bicycle parking requirements from Table 18.765.2 is none. FINDING: This standard is met. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The minimum parking requirement for Rail Lines/Utility Corridors is none. One parking space is proposed on the site. FINDING: This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The proposed structure is 60 square feet in size. FINDING: This criterion is not applicable as the proposed structure is less than 10,000 gross square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 11 OF 19 SENSITIVE LANDS: CHAPTER 18.775 Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within: the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas which are regulated by other agencies including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands, or are designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map, and steep slopes of 25% or greater and unstable ground. A land use application is required for ground disturbances in sensitive lands areas. The minimum elevation of the proposed site is approximately 137.5 feet. According to the 1984 Flood Insurance Work Map, Fanno Creek Sheet 105, the 100-year flood elevation is 134.0 feet. The most current flood elevation mapping for the City of Tigard is the "Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Restudy" Maps of March 20, 2000, which has not yet been adopted; according to this mapping, the 100-year flood elevation for Fanno Creek closest to this site location is 136 feet. As a small portion of the utility facility is located below grade and below the 100-year flood elevation, a Type I Sensitive Lands Review application is required in accordance with Section 18.775.020.B.1.c. Section 18.775.020.B.1.c.: The Director shall review minimal ground minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alternations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material, except in the floodway area by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this Chapter; The utility hub is 3'-6" below grade with an additional 6" of crushed gravel fill below the hub itself (and 5'-8" above grade). Therefore, the below grade hub elevation is at 134 feet, with gravel fill at 133.5' elevation. The amount of disturbance below the flood elevation can be calculated by multiplying the footprint size of the vault 60 feet x .5 feet which is equal to 30 cubic feet or 3.33 cubic yards. There are also two underground utility vaults that are proposed to be located just west of 74 h Avenue within the project area/easement. These vaults measure 4'-8" x 7'-0" each, or a total of 65.24 feet; they are to be located approximately 4'-8" below ground, at an elevation of 132.84 feet, or 1.16 feet below the 100-year flood elevation. Therefore, the quantity of disturbed material for the below ground vaults can be calculated by multiplying 65.24 feet x 1.16 feet, which equals 75.67 square feet, or 8.40 cubic yards. The total amount of material disturbed by all three utility vaults is approximately 11.73 cubic yards. An additional minimal amount of disturbance is attributable to the underground power conduits that are encased in concrete at approximately 3'-0" below grade, or 134.5 feet, but as this is not below the 100-year flood elevation, it is not counted in the total disturbance amount for Sensitive Lands Review. FINDING: This standard is met. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant shall protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a description of the trees located just along the southern boundary of the site (on the adjacent property) which include Douglas Firs, Oregon Ash and Cherry. One existing on-site tree is located on the site plan, however, the tree type or caliper is not specified. The applicant has proposed preservation of all trees on site and bordering the property. FINDING: The standard has not been met. In order to satisfy this standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.790, a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper; it shall indicate which trees are to be removed, a protection program defining standards, and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant shall contact the consulting arborist if the contractor needs to work within the root zone areas of the trees to be retained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 12 OF 19 Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The applicant has not shown a visual clearance triangle on the plans. The subject property fronts 74th Avenue, which is a local street more than 24 feet in width, which requires a 30-foot visual clearance triangle on the site. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the criteria shall be satisfied: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site plan and depict a 30-foot visual clearance triangle at the driveway to the street adjacent to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795 and Figure18.795.1. Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site. In no case shall tree branches obstruct the area of visual clearance, and all branches shall be removed below eight feet in the triangular area 30 feet on either side of the access in accordance with Chapter 18.795. In addition, all landscaping, except trees, in the area of visual clearance shall not exceed three feet in height from the top of curb. WATER RESOURCES (WR): CHAPTER 18.797 The WR overlay district applies to all significant wetlands and streams, and applicable riparian setback and water quality buffer areas, that appear on the Tigard Wetlands and streams, and riparian setback and water quality buffer areas, that appear on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination for the site, 2S-1-12AC, Tax Lot 800, prepared by their Engineer, David Evans and Associates, Inc, (DEA) dated January 10, 2000. The filed investigation occurred on August 13, 1999 with a finding that no wetlands or water resources exist on the site. The applicant has also submitted a USA Service Provider's letter dated July 17, 2000, which finds that there are no on site sensitive areas, however, there are off-site sensitive areas. In addition, the applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination Review from the Division of State Lands dated July 21, 2000 which concurs with the conclusion of the DEA Wetland Determination that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek (tax lot 900) does not meet wetland criteria. Standard riparian setbacks and USA water quality buffers. The applicant shall be responsible for surveying and mapping the precise location of the top of bank, wetland edge, riparian setback and/or USA water quality buffer at the time of application submittal. The required water quality buffer and riparian setback shall be retained in one of more parcels that is separate from abutting buildable lots; Table 18.797.1 summarizes riparian setbacks and water quality buffers that apply to significant water resources within the WR overlay zone: The applicant has submitted mapping provided by David Evans and Associates, Inc. which depicts the location of the top of bank and riparian setback for Ball Creek. The top of bank and 50-foot riparian setback is located on the property's to the south and west of the subject site, between 40-50 feet from the riparian setback located on the western edge of the subject Tax Lot 800. The riparian setback is located about 95 feet west and 50 south of the easement at its closest points. Ball Creek is designated as a Major Stream in accordance with the Definitions in TDC Section 18.797.020.A.6.a. The applicant's Wetland Determination report also states that there is a riparian forest associated with Ball Creek located on the southern portion of the adjacent property which eventually wraps around to form the western boundary of the subject property. The forested area comes closest to the proposed area and eventually wraps around to form the western boundary of the subject property. According to the applicant's report, "the existing incised channel indicates that Ball Creek enters the forested area through a five-foot culvert that runs underneath 74'1 Avenue. The creek is approximately eight feet deep from the bottom of the channel to the top of the bank and is fifteen feet wide from bank to bank. Historically this riparian forest may have been located within the creek's active floodplain." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 13 OF 19 FROM TABLE 18.797.1 RIPARIAN SETBACKS AND WATER QUALITY WR STANDARD USA STANDARD WATER BUFFERS SIGNIFICANT WATER RESOURCE TYPE RIPARIAN SETBACK' QUALITY BUFFER2 Tualatin River& associated wetlands 75 feet 25 feet Major streams & associated wetlands 50 feet 25 feet Developed subdivision lot exception 25 feet 25 feet (major streams & associated wetlands) Minor streams & adjacent/isolated wetlands Not applicable 25 feet Measured in feet from the top-of-bank or the associated wetland edge,whichever is greater. 2 Measured in feet from the stream top-of-bank or the wetland edge,whichever is greater. EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.797.2 WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT USE LIST REGULATED ACTIVITY & PROCEDURE TYPE 1. Type I — Permitted Uses with Mitigation Riparian Minor Streams 11 Mitigation Plan Setback Area Isolated Wetlands Required? a) Determination of Water Resource and Riparian Yes Yes No Setback boundaries Division of State Lands notification is required for all proposed development activities within any wetland. Unified Sewerage Agency standards are applicable when development activities are proposed within 25 feet of any wetland or stream. In accordance with Table 18.797.2 a Determination of Water Resource and Riparian setback boundaries is processed as a Type I land use application. FINDING: This standard has been met as the a Type I Water Resource Overlay Review was submitted along with a Wetland Determination and Resource mapping that found that here are no on-site wetlands or water resources. The Wetland Determination was substantiated by letters of concurrence from Division of State Lands, and Unified Sewerage Agency. The City of Tigard may need to correct the Comprehensive Plan maps to reflect this change in the future. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standards under Section 18.360.090.A are not applicable to the subject proposal as they relate only to residential uses: 3. (Exterior Elevations), 5. (Privacy and Noise: multi-family or group living uses), 6. (Private Outdoor Areas: multi-family use), 7. (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: multi-family use). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 14 OF 19 • Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; No trees are proposed for removal. Tree removal and preservation was previously addressed in Chapter 18.790 of this decision. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has not submitted information regarding whether or not the development is located in an area subject to ground slumping or sliding. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and The proposed structure is located 5'-0" from the north and south boundaries of the easement, and is proposed in an area currently not within proximity to any other buildings. To the west of the easement area is the Huntair parking lot. There are no buildings between the proposed utility vault and the street, therefore, this criterion is met. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. This criterion is not applicable, as the proposed structure will not be inhabited by people. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Tree removal and tree preservation were addressed previously and are conditioned under Chapter 18.790 Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant's Engineer shall verify that there is no ground slumping or sliding. The applicant shall meet the condition a listed under Chapter 18.790 in this decision. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. As this type of proposed use has minimal impact on the surrounding industrial uses, and generally has less impact than surrounding uses, no buffer is required. This standard is addressed further under Section 18.745.050 Landscaping and Screening in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 15 OF 19 This standard is addressed under Section 18.745.050, Buffering and Screening. 100-Year Floodplain: Section 18.360.090.A.8 Where landfill and/ or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration if the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle plan. According to the 1984 Flood Insurance Work Map, Sheet 105, the 100-year flood elevation is 134.0 feet. The most current flood elevation mapping for the City of Tigard is the "Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Restudy" Maps of March 20, 2000, which has not yet been adopted; according to this mapping the 100-year flood elevation for Fanno Creek closest to this site location is 136 feet. The utility facility, representing less than 50 cubic yards of disturbance, is located a few feet below grade and slightly below the 100-year flood elevation. The parent parcel, Tax Lot 800, has been in Industrial use for many years. FINDING: As the impacts to the 100-year floodplain due to the construction of this utility facility are minimal, no dedication of open land is required, and no pedestrian/bicycle plan is required. Therefore, this standard is met. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas, and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. The entire easement area will be defined as private space by a 6-foot chain link fabric fence, which will provide adequate protection for crime prevention. However, in accordance with comments from the City's Operation Utility Manager, the property Owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). The applicant shall submit any revisions to the location of the proposed fence for approval by the Planning Division and the Utility Manager. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes be located to prevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as liparking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that ght patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer has submitted comments that they have no objection to the proposal as submitted. FINDING: This standard is met. Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site fronts SW 74th Avenue which is not a Tri-met transit route, therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 16 OF 19 FINDING: This standard is not applicable. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The landscape requirements are addressed under Section 18.530.2 and Chapter 18.745 in this decision. FINDING: This standard has not been met, however, the applicant can satisfy the standard by meeting the conditions as listed under Section 18.530.2 in this decision. Drainage: Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This standard is addressed by the City Engineer under the public facility concerns in this decision. Provision for the Disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. Comments from the Building Division indicate that they have no objection to the project as proposed. Any ADA requirements will be specified by the Building Division. FINDING: This standard is met. D. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant did not submit an impact study. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall provide an impact study as set forth in TDC Section 18.390.040.B.e for approval by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 The City of Tigard Development Review Engineer provided the following comments with regard to this project: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 17 OF 19 1 . The application shows that they will use an existing driveway. Therefore, no additional driveways shall be created without them obtaining a permit from Engineering for additional work in the ROW. 2. The project will not be adding significant impervious areas to the site. It appears to be less than 200 square feet. Therefore, no additional onsite stormwater provisions are necessary. USA's generic letter, dated October 2, 2000, is irrelevant in this case. No water quality facility is warranted due to the very minimal increase in impervious area. In addition, hydraulic and hydrological analysis of the storm conveyance system in NOT necessary. 3. The plans do not indicate such, but if the applicant needs to perform ANY work in the public ROW, they must obtain a permit from Engineering for this work. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments. Currently, City of Tigard owns and operates an existing fire hydrant located within the ublic right-of-way/P.U.E. at this property. Property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency: Comments are addressed and incorporated in the Public Facility Concerns Section of this decision. U.S. Fish & Wildlife: No comments were received. U.S Army Corps of Engineers: No comments were received. Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL): A letter dated July 21, 2000 was received stating that no state removal of fill permit is required for the proposed activity. The DSL concurs with the applicant's finding that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek (Tax Lot 900) does not meet wetland criteria. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): No comments were received. TCI Cable: No comments were received. NW Natural Gas: No comments were received. PGE: Reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. R/R: No comments were received. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 18 OF 19 SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 17, 2000 AND EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 1, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 31, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. CZCcz / IZ October 17, 2000 PREPARE Y: Karen Perl Fox DATE Associate Planner S October 17. 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe dorff DATE Planning Manager I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-11 dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006—AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 19 OF 19 .;.�r � m I J C 1 \ \ y / 100 YEAR LEvAr0 S./ PER FA PANEL NO. \ / / 410276-005 DATED \ 's / / 3-1-62 ` O ,\ /..a // \ \ \\ N ..� o \ / \', \ ' NN� o 'mow " :w 11,11,W7116s0t 411_0 Wr..,tt.7....-/- , 7.-\ ,S I < / �. .-.D `......_..: _--- I rn il 1 \ / . , ,„ , . 1. F i I I TO • P OF BANK "S."-- � T . ._ . ---., .y:4-._ _ _._ ._._._.-._..• � r c___(3 . ; I 1 I_ _ :. j,,... .... 0 ; ........ CAM i lik. 141 II. CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2000-0001 I/SLR2000-00006 CITY Of TIO.RD SITE PLAN N AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES (Map is not to scale) aonp aH% 1 •O �� TyF CITY of TIGARD MI SI rr riij flttP �. /� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM '��'-'iLlWt_�I I Iii i}-' 1 9y 0,, VICINITY MAP I 61 a SDR2000-00011 • • c2 0:0 i - ER ��0 SLR2000-00006 e`-P AT&T BROADBAND °�') .t CABLE VAULTS,. j BONITA RD i l Li... ) SIT y , v ... Ps • N r l a 100 200 300 400 500 Feet a CARDINAL LN r.378 feet I — f- A City of Tigard I Info maUon on this map is for general location ony and GP's/ = should be ve(ed with the Development Services Division. �. - 0, 13125 ar,SW OR Hall 97223 F 2 Tigard,OR 97223 - 0 (503)639-4171• httpJiwww.d.t' fd.tx.ue Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2000;C:lmagicWIAGICO3APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00011 4111, SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 `�� CITY OF TIGARD AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES community Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/7/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00011 Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay (SLR) SLR2000-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following land use applications: 1. A secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. 2. Determination of Sensitive Lands and Water Resource Overlay Review APPLICANT: David DeVoist OWNERS: BHK Propertie§, LLC. Fraley/Stricker Architects 14280 SW 72nu Avenue 120 Lakeside Tigard, OR 97224 Seattle, WA 99122 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 17, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER I , 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 31, 2000. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Peri Fox at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. .4=,7 ,,-- L.--,..0 i .- :t--.7-.."1- ,-_,-. /,-- . —ill., -----±-14-\ \ .'r -L.:111)\;-Zre-H. -- I 2'1'; I . i pot .- — i oj3- ) • • r '{� lyyy i O O 1 y<- -7 \ , • CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-000I IISLR2000-00006 1 SITE PLAN N AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES (Map is not to scale) _�� St1D1 !4 7 � I VICI'NITY ITY MAP M , 1 il SDR2000-00011 ,_$' " . SLR2000 00006 _ ��II z,....-) AT&T BROADBAND .1 CABLE VAULTS H 1, r.T �1 -'u I - - SIT \�\ — I • N , 1 Ills LN , W I Aard \\ ano. 411k ASP- rs-mall SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: iluia 02 v. a 5 F— Company: f.,1„,i/- fn G(teu - Phone: Fax: aU(.,0 - 322- - arZS From: ,_. Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 Date: q/,2 7 /6 V Pages including this page: 4 / x COMMENTS: .Q% % /3-j o6 d `J -e{ SY9/2 aO(2O OC2d// r/5 .2O!'U-0!'o(p -4 kx./..t,a etrid[mot UX 414/14-44J . /yn aAG(/tz-i 44, otA4_,/ FLU)/L L-Ti , I/Y"� GY1/vt-L^ ,444 l ifiv,a � a�/-9/i c Cc e,-,'z-v . L %et-e-A- (17Y - - ---,IA darn/rfed e%La-rte n071 4. c`� G'/le_ /4lf/)--e_ f.)/ 5rfri/hC 6.)/2-2-, ht/i< fil -f%e , (1.e 6-34,o,, 194/x 13 e <-7A--1 c%1 a ('�/�rr 44-it a17,, 1 egf7/l /d vp-lit f/ e S r L LC - 7).„-- f22c_2.e_ sic 6.--yr f -1 f -z ad-C-- ,DD C 1.4,--vt-I---.A.-0s (VIA-Y. L9-1-4 I 347 C12/(.c,o . +Z 1ivt�V/Yt C��-e 41--v (,o /'1 c&CJ //21 x-41 6 i .l/:7...,_, i o c.c,c d CIA /2 /G<--,ti o1 %c a-� Aq c-(2 e-.� � rp` � City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 77" ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** . f FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS • A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 TEL 206/324-4800 FAX 206/322-2875 SUMMARY LETTER FOR BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AT&T proposes a secondary hub facility at 14645 SW 74th Ave,Tigard,OR. This will house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV,high-speed data and telephone signals. The shelter fits a 6' X 10' foot print and will sit within a 60 X 20 easement,which includes your required 35' set back,per Karen Fox and Brian Roger. Below are City of Tigard concerns from the Pre-Application Conference meeting of Dec.7, 1999. City of Tigard Site Location: 14645 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR Zoning: I-P Industrial Park District Adjacent property also I-P. 18.530 Zoning and Equipment 35' setback from Front. Comment: Also,note:All accessory structure except those less than 120 sq. ft in size require a Building Permit.CUE 610 is 60 sq. ft. 18.795 Clear Vision Area Comment: Using a 6' chain link fence set back 5' 7"from side walk curbs and road(No visual obstruction) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening Comment: (Several trees are at this site and none will be removed) RECEIVED PLANNING APR 0 5 2000 CITY OF TIGARD FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS • A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 18.745C Site Plan Requirement Comment: Existing trees around lease area are: 10"Pear 16"Cherry 6"Cherry 8"Cherry 26"Ash 6"Fir 6"Maple x3 I believe no screening buffer is required. 18.775 Sensitive Lands 1. The 100 year floodplain Comment: See Survey 2.Natural drainage way Comment: No drainage through easement 3. Wetland Area Comment: See wetland determination by David Evans&Associates,Inc. 4. Steep slopes>25%and unstable ground. Comment: Does not exist at this site 18.790.30 Tree Removal Plan Requirement Comment: No trees will have to be moved 18.765 Off-street Parking Comment: After the construction and equipment is installed,a technician will maintain and inspect the equipment about once a month. There is room for parking within the easement area. 18.705 Ingress/Egress/Circulation Comment: Existing FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS . • A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING On February 17,2000,49 letters were sent out for the March 9,2000 neighborhood meeting which was held in the City of Tigard Town Hall Meeting Room. The event time was from 6:30 PM to 9:00 PM. I picked up the key at 6:15 PM and opened the hall at that time.Glenn Koshiyama of AT&T Broadband and 1,were the only two people in attendance. I terminated the meeting at 7:30 PM when it was evident that no one was going to attend. Thank you for your time in this matter.Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions. Regards, David DeVoist Senior Project Manager NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIEI LDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYOFTI CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Skaping17 Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: September 27, 2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00011 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES PROPOSAL: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10-foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74`h Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 13. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL DOME A PART OF THE PERMAN PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING IN.! URMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I I -. VICINITY MAP R• Mob I SDR2000-00011 _ ,„EAT • SLR2000-00006 AT&T I I. _____11. , CABLE VAULTS k\ „„„„,,,,„ \\ • w a ..-...__ City tTpd Geier ... REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DIVISION OF STATE ' A',ngommunityDeveropment RECEIVED ,SiYa7nngA Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 �� p LitlJ ...-7 20, f, 1: I TO: OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS RECEIVED PLANNING- FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division NOV 0 3 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner 1x3151 CITY OF TIGARD Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: 15031604-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRM 2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW MLR]2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND& INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: , I 1 � e wb o -o322) awi ��oP� w;l\ �.�- r ore #1_ s-r. (Please provide the following information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: -- l 3_37 -3 cos .'Mo .,.") -ex+,-231 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: October 16, 2000 TO: Karen Fox, Associate Planner r FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer ' " RE: SDR 2000-00011, AT&T Broadband and Internet Services I have the following comments with regard to this project: 1. The application shows that they will use an existing driveway. Therefore, no additional driveways shall be created without them obtaining a permit from Engineering for additional work in the ROW. 2. The project will not be adding significant impervious areas to the site. It appears to be less than 200 square feet. Therefore, no additional onsite stormwater provisions are necessary. USA's generic letter, dated October 2, 2000, is irrelevant in this case. No water quality facility is warranted due to the very minimal increase in impervious area. In addition, hydraulic and hydrological analysis of the storm conveyance system in NOT necessary. 3. The plans do not indicate such, but if the applicant needs to perform ANY work in the public ROW, they must obtain a permit from Engineering for this work. If you have questions, please let me know. \\tig333\usr\depts\erig\brianr\corespondence\1 0162000-at8t.doc REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone: 15031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDI]2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND&INTERNET SERVICES ' REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE & CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: / We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: 4X-ait) ��v REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 0 5 2000 CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x3151 Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: [5031 684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLRI 2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Pkase provide the follinuing information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: `1\)(4 ' O • A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIOARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager OCT 0 3 2000 FB1HV �� City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR)2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND &INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Z_ Written comments provided below: 0unatmky i (1,(Ty o F' t Lc,4r>' A-No vpenA rr A- Ext c-'u A /11-y0 r ( E» w1774., J FuBue. -of- / pu£ AT T711S fit of7_ry, fko"c/LT7 o9w1/414 14rei.. cr4,iT S > Sut2 1}T' ,r JYl,rvin' um ,S'-O" &GCA.ez A-tires 4i1ow)o 774 'sr�Aut, hs6 /, ir✓rL, (if. P.m pis) f c.6" M4 yrye iN Cons cucr) (Please provide the folrming information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: //4 i�1-e72 k 3475— A,„, , REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OFTI3ARD Community Deve[opment Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: / 4[John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division P 2 8 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x3151 Gil Y OF TIGARD Phone: 1503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND &INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLE E CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease provide the fotrowing information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: i J. f UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: October 2, 2000 OCT 0 4 2000 TO: Karen Fox, City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD FROM: Julia Huffman, USA 'lc SUBJECT: AT&T Broadband, SDR 2000-00011, SLR 2000-00006 STORM SEWER Each lot in the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 00-7. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists. Developer must preserve a corridor as described in the R&O separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive area shall be identified on plans. • Applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in Unified Sewerage Agency's Service Provider letter dated July 19,2000. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF HOARD Community Devetopment StapingA Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 rl TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program 11 f I FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division u S E P 2 8 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner 1x3151 By- Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLID 2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease provide the foowing information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: )42.,/oc, rt REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIIGARD Community Development Shaping)?Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 0 4 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner[x3151 CITY OF TIG RD Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: 1503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR)2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (lease provide the following information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: I Phone Number(s): 44cL A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY FTtOARD Community cDevelopment Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox,Associate Planner(x315) Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2000-00011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)2000-00006 AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10- foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 11. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (ease provide the foltowing information)Name/Phone#of Person Commenting: , C►_ OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMIIIITS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NO[SJ: 5p a D l/ — -3/._/<.' pat.,90 - 6,,e-o4,-., FILE HAMEISI: AT v ( 670o dhO-,,/-c-( CITIIEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central ❑ East ( outh)West ❑ Li Also Place For Review in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES ONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor _'_COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Dvlpmnt.Svcs.Technicians POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer -T BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Roger,Dvlpmnt Review Engineer _ WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager ✓ PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS . TUAL. HILLS PARK& REC. DIST.* >(I'UALATIN VALLEY FIRE &RESCUE * TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * h UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huflman/SWM Program 15101 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 145 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 91015 Hillsboro,OR 91124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * i OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE \\OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE Irish Bunnell,DeveopmentServices PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING • _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) N US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPAIZOA) Larry French(Comp Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PoweninesinArea) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N. First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO • Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Punning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 / _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * Anne LaMountain(iGA URB) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(iGAniRB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Steve Conway(General Apps) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer icPArzceiris 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(SCA)Ms is Portland,OR 97204 _Dona Mateja(zCA)MS 14 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised 13-Jul-00) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS 'TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. lifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within''/.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 ' `/PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC �W NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR030546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.E.ofHalvNal99w) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 *INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITHJNTERGOYERNMENTAI AGREEMENT ILWITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIOARD Community(Development Shaping)/Better Community STATE OT OREGON- ) County of'Washington )ss. City of ward ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-000I I/SLR2000-00006 —AT&T BROADBAND AND INTERNET SERVICES_ O AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: C} C AMENDED NOTICE (File No./NarneReference) (Date of PublicHeanng) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:. I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) - City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission . Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: _ I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Healing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE[S] of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", on OCt I I ' 11. - ! ! I .n+•depo ed in the United States Mail on October 11,2000, postage prepaid. AP 'ersert 'epared 141,.tice)• •Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3T day of I-, A.. %��, —_�_• , 2AA�' )0, ire,/,6,--L.) OFFICIAL SEAL "/-/ / F )• DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC OF 0'EGO NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires( 5/7 j COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II 'DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000.00011 CITY OFTIGARD AND SENSIT VE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2004-00006 7vmmunityDevelo13mcnt Shaping eBetterCommunity" AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND""INTERNET SERVICES. 120 DAYS = 12/7/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review—Type II (SDR) SDR2000-00011 Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay (SLR) SLR2000-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following land use applications: 1. A secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. 2. Determination of Sensitive Lands and Water Resource Overlay Review. APPLICANT: Fraley/Stricker Architects OWNERS: BHK Propertie§, LLC. 120 Lakeside 14280 SW 72nu Avenue Seattle, WA 99122 Tigard, OR 97224 Attn: David DeVoist COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard`Commulniity Development Directors designee has APPROVED the above request subject tip certain condition„ This findings and conclusions on which the decision is'based are noted in Section fll NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006—AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 1 OF 19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE BRIAN RAGER, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (503) 639-4171.) Submit to the Planning Division (Karen Fox, 639-4171, ext. 315) for review and approval: 1 . The applicant shall provide the percent of existing landscaping on the site, and percent of proposed new landscaping to meet the 25% landscape requirement on the easement area. Alternatively, the applicant shall verify in the landscape plan, that 25% landscaping already exists on Tax Lot 800, the parent parcel. The applicant shall submit the revised landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. 2. The applicant shall submit evidence and a sufficiently detailed description of the use to fully address Chapter 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards. 3. The applicant shall revise plans to incorporate specifications as follows: All topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the site and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. 4. The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a minimum trash enclosure of 11 square feet, and specify which method of collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables they will use. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a letter of explanation for approval by the Planning Division describing the on-site storage anticipated and how it will dispose of any stored waste. 5. In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the dimensions of the parking space, which shall be no less than the minimum size of one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate that the access drive shall be improved with asphalt or concrete. The applicant shall indicate on the plans the striping of parking space(s), directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. 6. In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.790, a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper; it shall indicate which trees are to be removed, a protection program defining standards, and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant shall contact the consulting arborist if the contractor needs to work within the root zone areas of the trees to be retained. 7. The applicant shall revise the site plan and depict a 30-foot visual clearance triangle at the driveway to the street adjacent to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795 and Figure18.795.1 . Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site. In no case shall tree branches obstruct the area of visual clearance, and all branches shall be removed below eight feet in the triangular area 30 feet on either side of the access in accordance with Chapter 18.795. In addition, all landscaping, except trees, in the area of visual clearance shall not exceed three feet in height from the top of curb. 8. The property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). The applicant shall submit any revisions to the location of the proposed fence for approval by the Planning Division and the Utility Manager. 9. The applicant's Engineer shall verify that there is no ground slumping or sliding. 10. The applicant shall provide an impact study as set forth in TDC Section 18.390.040.B.e for approval by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 2 OF 19 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information and Proposal Description: ICI Cable has an easement containing .03 acres on this site which is owned by BHK Properties, LLC. The approximate 1 ,200 square foot project area is located on the southeastern portion of 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800, which is .96 acres in size. The subject Tax Lot 800 is partially paved with an access just to the north of the easement area which serves the Huntair industrial business on this parent parcel. There are no buildings or structures currently on the easement. There are designated wetlands mapped on the southern portion of the site and floodplain mapped on the western portion of the site on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map. However, the applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination finding that there are no wetlands which exist within 50 feet of the subject easement/project area. The southern boundary of the property is bordered by various trees. The proposal is to located a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. This aboveground vault has a 6-foot x 10-foot footprint and will site with a 60-foot x 20-foot easement (approximately). The vault is proposed to be located outside of the 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74 Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4'-8" in length x 7' x 5' feet in depth. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback, but is not included in this application. The site slopes gently to the southwest toward the confluence of Fanno and Ball Creek off-site. Vicinity Information: The easement site is located west of 74th Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad and south of Bonita Road. Ball Creek and a riparian forest is located approximately 75 feet to the south, and Fanno Creek and is approximately 200 feet to the west of the subject easement area. The confluence of the two streams and the 50-foot riparian setback is located on the adjacent property to the southwest of the easement area. To the north pf the subject site is Huntair, an industrial property, Industrial Park. To the east of the site is 74 Avenue; and beyond that is property zoned Light Industrial and the Southern Pacific Railroad. To the south of the site is a recently constructed, fenced graveled parking lot with a paved approach on the northeast portion of the adjacent lot. To the west of the site is a portion of the Huntair property and Fanno Creek. SECTION IV. DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES, PERMITS AND USE Use Classification: Section 18.130.020 Lists the Use Categories. The applicant is proposing to build a utility vault. This use is classified in Code Chapter 18.130 (Use Classifications) as Other — Rail Lines/Utility Corridors. The site is located within the Industrial Park District. Table 18.530.1 lists Rail Lines/Utility Corridors as a permitted use in the I-P zone. Summary Land Use Permits: Chapter 18.310 Defines the decision-making type to which the land-use application is assigned. This is a new construction proposal requiring Site Development Review and is, therefore, defined as a Type II Application. The Type II procedure applies to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Type I I actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Officer. The Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay District Review is a Type I review as no construction is proposed within the 50-foot riparian setback, and less than 50 cubic yards of material are proposed to be disturbed within the 100-year floodplain. The Type I review is incorporated into this Type II decision. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 3 OF 19 Decision Making Procedures: Chapter 18.390 Describes the decision making procedures. A Type II procedure applies to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain some discretionary criteria. Tyee II actions are decided by the Director with public notice and appeals are heard by the Hearing's Oficer. Type I procedures apply to ministerial permits and actions, containing clear and objective approval criteria, and are decided by the Director without public notice. SECTION V. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS No comments were received from surrounding property owners. SECTION VI. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA A summary of the applicable criteria in this case in the Chapter order in which they are addressed in this decision are as follows: A. Zoning Districts 18.530 (Industrial Zoning Districts) B. Specific Development Standards 18.705 Access, Egress & Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed solid Waste & Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements) 18.775 Sensitive Lands) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resource Overlay District) Land Use Decisions C. 18.360 Site Development Review- Specific standards) D. 18.390 (Impact Study Section 18.390.040) E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters:18.715 (Density Computations), 18.720 (Design Compatibility), 18.730 (Exceptions to Development Standards), 18.742 (Home Occupations), 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations), 18.760 (Nonconforming Situations), 18.780 (Signs), 18.785 (Temporary Uses), 18.798 (Wireless Communication Facilities). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. SECTION VII. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: A. ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Zoning District: Section 18.530.020 Lists the description of the Industrial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the I-P: Industrial Park District. Development Standards: Section 18.530.2 States that Development standards in industrial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.530.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 4 OF 19 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P I-L I-H Minimum Lot Size None None None Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. - Side facing street on corner & through lots [1] 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 0/50 ft. [3] 0/50 ft. [3] - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- -- -- Maximum Height 45 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75% [5] 85% 85% Maximum Landscape Requirement 25% [6] 15% 15% [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795 (Vision Clearance) must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5] Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80% if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the site development review process. Tax Lot 800 is approximately .96 acres, and the easement project area is approximately .03 acres within Tax Lot 800, or 1,200 square feet. Proposed structure footprint area is 60 square feet. Tax Lot 800 has a width of 167.80 feet exceeding the minimum 50-foot width requirement. There is no minimum lot size. The above-ground utility vault is located approximately 50 feet from the front property line and, therefore, meets the front yard setback requirement of 35 feet. The required side and rear and setbacks are zero feet as the property does not abut residential property. The height of the structure is 5'-8" above grade, which is well below the 45 feet maximum height allowed by Code. The Minimum landscape requirement is 25%, except that a reduction to 20% of the site may be approved through the site development review process. The applicant has not provided information pertaining to the percent of lancscaping provided on the site, only that the existing trees will be retained. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION:The applicant shall provide the percent of existing landscaping on the site, and percent of proposed new landscaping to meet the 25% landscape requirement on the easement area. Alternatively, the applicant shall verify in the landscape plan, that 25% landscaping already exists on Tax Lot 800, the parent parcel. The applicant shall submit the revised landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Division. B. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.700 Site Development Review Approval Standards: Chapter 18.360 is applicable to all new developments and major modifications of existing developments. It defines the Applicability of Provisions, the Approval Process, and the Approval Criteria for the standards contained in the Community Development Code. Site Development Review: Section 18.360.090 requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the applicable criteria in the Community Development Code. NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 5 OF 19 The applicable Community Development Code (CDC) criteria in this case are listed in the Summary of Applicable Criteria above in Section VII. of this decision. A list of the non-applicable criteria can also be found there. The following addresses the Specific Development Standards in the Community Development Code: ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION: CHAPTER 18.705 Applicability of Provisions: Section 18.705.020 The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. This development involves the construction of a new structure, therefore, the provisions of this Chapter are applicable. Walkway Location: Section 18.705.030.F On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; This requirement is not applicable as this use is classified as a Utility Corridor (communication line), and not a commercial, institutional or industrial use. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; This criteria is not applicable as the property is not in residential use of any kind. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; No walkways are proposed or required, therefore, this criteria is not applicable. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. No walkways are proposed or required, therefore, this criteria is not applicable. FINDING: The standard has been met as no walkways are proposed or required. Minimum Access requirements for commercial and industrial use: Section 18.705.030.1 Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 6 OF 19 There is an existing driveway which is 35'-5" wide just north of the easement area which can serve as access to this hub facility. FINDING: The existing entry access is adequate to serve the facility. This standard is met. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.725 Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The telecom use poses no known noise, visible emissions, vibration or odors known to Staff that would be atypical for Industrial Park District. The applicant, however, has not provided specific information in its narrative application addressing this standard. This standard is applicable at all times in the future. FINDING: This standard is not met, as the applicant does not address it, however, the standard can be met if the applicant satisfies the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall submit evidence and a sufficiently detailed description of the use to fully address Chapter 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: CHAPTER 18.745 Establishes standards for landscaping, buffering and screening to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City. Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 Development projects with more than 100 feet of frontage along a street or private driveway plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.C. There is approximately 189 feet of frontage along Tax Lot 800 and 74th Avenue, however, there is only 20 feet of frontage along the easement/project area which contains this use. Therefore, this standard is not applicable as proposed development is limited to the easement area. In addition, existing trees will be retained on site providing greenery close to the street. FINDING: This standard is not applicable to this development project which is contained in an easement with frontage of less than 100 feet. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050.A.2 Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this Chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The proposed use, Utility Corridor/communication lines is a different use than the surrounding industrial uses. The proposed use type is not specifically listed in Table 18.745.1. As this type of proposed use has minimal impact on the surrounding industrial uses, and generally has less impact than surrounding uses. Therefore, no buffer is required. Buffering and Screening Requirements: Section 18.745.050.B A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. Buffering and Screening is addressed further under the Site Development Review Criteria: Section 18.360.090.A.4 Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses. Screening: Section 18.745.050.B.5 Where screening is required, the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: 1) A hedge of narrow or broadleaf evergreen shrubs that will form a four (4)- foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years of planting, or; 2) An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials that will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two (2) years. The unplanted NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 7 OF 19 • portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn, ground cover, or bark mulch, or; 3) A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2, shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. The applicant proposes to screen the entire perimeter of the site with a 6'-0" chain link fabric fence with vinyl slats. Existing screening is also provided via trees along the south boundary of the property and the riparian forested area along Ball and Fanno Creek on the adjacent property to the south. The riparian forest also wraps around the subject site's western boundary. No additional screening is required. FINDING: This standard is met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E Requires the screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. There is one parking space proposed on site. As the applicant proposes to screen the entire perimeter of the site with a 6'-0" chain link fabric fence with vinyl slats, the parking area will be screened from view. The parking area is also screened from view by existing trees to the south and one existing tree to the southeast and east. In addition, the property owners to the south have constructed a tall site-obscuring fence (cyclone fence with wooden slats), therefore, the parking area will virtually not be visible, except from the Huntair property on the parent parcel. There is an existing tree on the site adjacent to and east of the parking area which is proposed to be retained. FINDING: This standard is met. Re-vegetation: Section 18.745.060 Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. The applicant has not addressed this criteria. FINDING: This criteria has not been fully been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition during grading and construction, then the criteria shall be satisfied: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise plans to incorporate specifications as follows: All topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the site and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and after completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES STORAGE: CHAPTER 18.755 This Chapter requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on- site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. Section 18.755.040 requires that the applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standards, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review. The applicant NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 8 OF 19 • will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Minimum standards method, Section 18.755.040.C5.b (2) states that non-residential buildings shall provide shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus for other: 4 square feet/1000 square feet GFA. The applicant does not address this criteria. The proposed concrete structure will house only communication transport equipment, and will not house people. The applicant shall clarify whether there will be any on site storage of waste or recyclables. Typically, a minimum storage area of 10 square feet plus 4 square feet/1000 square feet GFA is required. FINDING: This standard is not met. However, if the applicant meets the condition listed below this standard will be met: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site plan to include a minimum trash enclosure of 11 square feet, and specify which method of collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables they will use. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a letter of explanation for approval by the Planning Division describing the on-site storage anticipated and how it will dispose of any stored waste. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: CHAPTER 18.765 General Provisions: Section 18.765.040 Access Drives: Section 18.765.040.B. Requires access to public streets from off-street parking as follows: Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; The access drive is addressed under Chapter 18.705 in this decision. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; The access drive is part of an existing loop drive, which also serves the Huntair business located to the north on the parent parcel. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; This criterion is addressed under Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 in this decision. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and The existing loop access drive for Huntair and the parent parcel is paved with asphalt. The applicant's plan indicates a shared access (on the same parcel) with the Huntair business to the north. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. This criterion is not applicable as there is only one parking space proposed. Pedestrian Access: Section 18.765.040.F Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 9 OF 19 • Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. This criterion is addressed under Section 18.705.030.F in this decision. In addition, there are no drop-off grade separations, therefore, this portion of the standard is not applicable. Parking Lot Landscaping: Section 18.765.040.G Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.745 in this decision. Parking Space Surfacing: Section 18.765.040.H Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; It is unclear from the applicant's plans whether or not the parking space is proposed to be paved. The parking space, and access drive to it, shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfacing. Parking Lot Striping: Section 18.765.040.1 Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. This is a non-residential development, therefore, this criterion is applicable and shall be met through striping of parking spaces, directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. Wheel Stops: Section 18.765.040.J Requires that parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The single parking space within the project area/easement is not along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped area or sidewalk, therefore, no wheel stop is required. Lighting: Section 18.765.040.L Lights provided to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. No lighting plan was submitted by the applicant. As there are no adjacent residential zones, this criterion is not applicable. Signs: Section 18.765.040.M Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. No signage plans or elevations were submitted with this application. The applicant shall submit plans and elevations for signage, if any is proposed, to the Planning Division under a separate land use application. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 10 OF 19 • 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; • 7.5' x 16.5 for a compact spaces; and • As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; • The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. Aisles accommodating two—way direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant proposed a single parking space with dimensions 6.75 feet x 13.5 feet which is inadequate in size to meet the standards. The parking space shall meet the minimum size for one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. FINDING: The General Provisions for Off-Street Parking and Loading requirements have not been met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the standard will be met: CONDITION: In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.765, the applicant shall revise the plans and indicate the dimensions of the parking space, which shall be no less than the minimum size of one compact space, which is 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet. The applicant shall revise the plans and indicate that the access drive shall be improved with asphalt or concrete. The applicant shall indicate on the plans the striping of parking space(s), directional signs, and painted signs in the access and drive aisles to show direction of flow as conditioned. Bicycle Parking Design Standards: Section 18.765.050 A minimum of two bicycle parking rack spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of the primary entrances to structures; Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The minimum bicycle parking requirements from Table 18.765.2 is none. FINDING: This standard is met. Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements: Section 18.765.070.H The minimum parking requirement for Rail Lines/Utility Corridors is none. One parking space is proposed on the site. FINDING: This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Requirements: Section 18.765.080 requires that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space. A minimum of one (1) loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet but less than 40,000 gross square feet. A minimum of two loading spaces is required for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less that twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. The proposed structure is 60 square feet in size. FINDING: This criterion is not applicable as the proposed structure is less than 10,000 gross square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 11 OF 19 • SENSITIVE LANDS: CHAPTER 18.775 Sensitive lands are lands potentially unsuitable for development because of their location within: the 100-year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas which are regulated by other agencies including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Division of State Lands, or are designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map, and steep slopes of 25% or greater and unstable ground. A land use application is required for ground disturbances in sensitive lands areas. The minimum elevation of the proposed site is approximately 137.5 feet. According to the 1984 Flood Insurance Work Map, Fanno Creek Sheet 105, the 100-year flood elevation is 134.0 feet. The most current flood elevation mapping for the City of Tigard is the "Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Restudy" Maps of March 20, 2000, which has not yet been adopted; according to this mapping, the 100-year flood elevation for Fanno Creek closest to this site location is 136 feet. As a small portion of the utility facility is located below grade and below the 100-year flood elevation, a Type I Sensitive Lands Review application is required in accordance with Section 18.775.020.B.1 .c. Section 18.775.020.B.1.c.: The Director shall review minimal ground minimal ground disturbance(s) or landform alternations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material, except in the floodway area by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030 subject to compliance with all of the standards in this Chapter; The utility hub is 3'-6" below grade with an additional 6" of crushed gravel fill below the hub itself (and 5'-8" above grade). Therefore, the below grade hub elevation is at 134 feet, with gravel fill at 133.5' elevation. The amount of disturbance below the flood elevation can be calculated by multiplying the footprint size of the vault 60 feet x .5 feet which is equal to 30 cubic feet or 3.33 cubic yards. There are also two underground utility vaults that are proposed to be located just west of 741" Avenue within the project area/easement. These vaults measure 4'-8" x 7'-0" each, or a total of 65.24 feet; they are to be located approximately 4'-8" below ground, at an elevation of 132.84 feet, or 1.16 feet below the 100-year flood elevation. Therefore, the quantity of disturbed material for the below ground vaults can be calculated by multiplying 65.24 feet x 1 .16 feet, which equals 75.67 square feet, or 8.40 cubic yards. The total amount of material disturbed by all three utility vaults is approximately 11 .73 cubic yards. An additional minimal amount of disturbance is attributable to the underground power conduits that are encased in concrete at approximately 3'-0" below grade, or 134.5 feet, but as this is not below the 100-year flood elevation, it is not counted in the total disturbance amount for Sensitive Lands Review. FINDING: This standard is met. TREE REMOVAL: CHAPTER 18.790 A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant shall protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has submitted a description of the trees located just along the southern boundary of the site (on the adjacent property) which include Douglas Firs, Oregon Ash and Cherry. One existing on-site tree is located on the site plan, however, the tree type or caliper is not specified. The applicant has proposed preservation of all trees on site and bordering the property. FINDING: The standard has not been met. In order to satisfy this standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION: In accordance with TDC Chapter 18.790, a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper; it shall indicate which trees are to be removed, a protection program defining standards, and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant shall contact the consulting arborist if the contractor needs to work within the root zone areas of the trees to be retained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 12 OF 19 Visual Clearance Areas: Chapter 18.795 Clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center grade, except the trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. For arterial streets the visual clearance shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The applicant has not shown a visual clearance triangle on the plans. The subject property fronts 74th Avenue, which is a local street more than 24 feet in width, which requires a 30-foot visual clearance triangle on the site. FINDING: This standard is not fully met. However, if the applicant meets the following condition, the criteria shall be satisfied: CONDITION: The applicant shall revise the site plan and depict a 30-foot visual clearance triangle at the driveway to the street adjacent to the site in accordance with TDC Chapter 18.795 and Figure18.795.1 . Visual clearance shall be maintained at the access to the site. In no case shall tree branches obstruct the area of visual clearance, and all branches shall be removed below eight feet in the triangular area 30 feet on either side of the access in accordance with Chapter 18.795. In addition, all landscaping, except trees, in the area of visual clearance shall not exceed three feet in height from the top of curb. WATER RESOURCES (WR): CHAPTER 18.797 The WR overlay district applies to all significant wetlands and streams, and applicable riparian setback and water quality buffer areas, that appear on the Tigard Wetlands and streams, and riparian setback and water quality buffer areas, that appear on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination for the site, 2S-1-12AC, Tax Lot 800, prepared by their Engineer, David Evans and Associates, Inc, (DEA) dated January 10, 2000. The filed investigation occurred on August 13, 1999 with a finding that no wetlands or water resources exist on the site. The applicant has also submitted a USA Service Provider's letter dated July 17, 2000, which finds that there are no on site sensitive areas, however, there are off-site sensitive areas. In addition, the applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination Review from the Division of State Lands dated July 21 , 2000 which concurs with the conclusion of the DEA Wetland Determination that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek (tax lot 900) does not meet wetland criteria. Standard riparian setbacks and USA water quality buffers. The applicant shall be responsible for surveying and mapping the precise location of the top of bank, wetland edge, riparian setback and/or USA water quality buffer at the time of application submittal. The required water quality buffer and riparian setback shall be retained in one of more parcels that is separate from abutting buildable lots; Table 18.797.1 summarizes riparian setbacks and water quality buffers that apply to significant water resources within the WR overlay zone: The applicant has submitted mapping provided by David Evans and Associates, Inc. which depicts the location of the top of bank and riparian setback for Ball Creek. The top of bank and 50-foot riparian setback is located on the property's to the south and west of the subject site, between 40-50 feet from the riparian setback located on the western edge of the subject Tax Lot 800. The riparian setback is located about 95 feet west and 50 south of the easement at its closest points. Ball Creek is designated as a Major Stream in accordance with the Definitions in TDC Section 18.797.020.A.6.a. The applicant's Wetland Determination report also states that there is a riparian forest associated with Ball Creek located on the southern portion of the adjacent property which eventually wraps around to form the western boundary of the subject property. The forested area comes closest to the proposed area and eventually wraps around to form the western boundary of the subject property. According to the applicant's report, "the existing incised channel indicates that Ball Creek enters the forested area through a five-foot culvert that runs underneath 74t Avenue. The creek is approximately eight feet deep from the bottom of the channel to the top of the bank and is fifteen feet wide from bank to bank. Historically this riparian forest may have been located within the creek's active floodplain." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 13 OF 19 • FROM TABLE 18.797.1 RIPARIAN SETBACKS AND WATER QUALITY WR STANDARD USA STANDARD WATER BUFFERS SIGNIFICANT WATER RESOURCE TYPE RIPARIAN SETBACK' QUALITY BUFFER2 Tualatin River & associated wetlands 75 feet 25 feet • Major streams & associated wetlands 50 feet 25 feet Developed subdivision lot exception 25 feet 25 feet (major streams & associated wetlands) Minor streams & adjacent/isolated wetlands Not applicable 25 feet 1 Measured in feet from the top-of-bank or the associated wetland edge,whichever is greater. 2 Measured in feet from the stream top-of-bank or the wetland edge, whichever is greater. EXCERPT FROM TABLE 18.797.2 WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT USE LIST REGULATED ACTIVITY & PROCEDURE TYPE 1. Type I — Permitted Uses with Mitigation Riparian Minor Streams Mitigation Plan Setback Area Isolated Wetlands Required? a) Determination of Water Resource and Riparian Yes Yes No Setback boundaries Division of State Lands notification is required for all proposed development activities within any wetland. Unified Sewerage Agency standards are applicable when development activities are proposed within 25 feet of any wetland or stream. In accordance with Table 18.797.2 a Determination of Water Resource and Riparian setback boundaries is processed as a Type I land use application. FINDING: This standard has been met as the a Type I Water Resource Overlay Review was submitted along with a Wetland Determination and Resource mapping that found that here are no on-site wetlands or water resources. The Wetland Determination was substantiated by letters of concurrence from Division of State Lands, and Unified Sewerage Agency. The City of Tigard may need to correct the Comprehensive Plan maps to reflect this change in the future. C. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Site Development Review Approval Criteria (Section 18.360.090.A): Provides additional Site Development Review approval criteria not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. The following standards under Section 18.360.090.A are not applicable to the subject proposal as they relate only to residential uses: 3. (Exterior Elevations), 5. (Privacy and Noise: multi-family or group living uses), 6. (Private Outdoor Areas: multi-family use), 7. (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: multi-family use). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.360.090.A.2 Buildings shall be: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 14 OF 19 • Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; No trees are proposed for removal. Tree removal and preservation was previously addressed in Chapter 18.790 of this decision. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; The applicant has not submitted information regarding whether or not the development is located in an area subject to ground slumping or sliding. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and The proposed structure is located 5'-0" from the north and south boundaries of the easement, and is proposed in an area currently not within proximity to any other buildings. To the west of the easement area is the Huntair parking lot. There are no buildings between the proposed utility vault and the street, therefore, this criterion is met. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. This criterion is not applicable, as the proposed structure will not be inhabited by people. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. Tree removal and tree preservation were addressed previously and are conditioned under Chapter 18.790 Tree Removal in this decision. FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet this standard, the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant's Engineer shall verify that there is no ground slumping or sliding. The applicant shall meet the condition a listed under Chapter 18.790 in this decision. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.360.090.A.4.a Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses, and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise level, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; • The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height. • The direction (s) from which buffering is needed; • The required density of the buffering; and • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. As this type of proposed use has minimal impact on the surrounding industrial uses, and generally has less impact than surrounding uses, no buffer is required. This standard is addressed further under Section 18.745.050 Landscaping and Screening in this decision. Section 18.360.090.A.4.b requires that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: • What needs to be screened; • The direction from which it is needed; • How dense the screen needs to be; • Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile ;and • Whether the screening needs to be year around. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 15 OF 19 • This standard is addressed under Section 18.745.050, Buffering and Screening. 100-Year Floodplain: Section 18.360.090.A.8 Where landfill and/ or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration if the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle plan. According to the 1984 Flood Insurance Work Map, Sheet 105, the 100-year flood elevation is 134.0 feet. The most current flood elevation mapping for the City of Tigard is the "Fanno Creek Watershed Flood Insurance Restudy" Maps of March 20, 2000, which has not yet been adopted; according to this mapping the 100-year flood elevation for Fanno Creek closest to this site location is 136 feet. The utility facility, representing less than 50 cubic yards of disturbance, is located a few feet below grade and slightly below the 100-year flood elevation. The parent parcel, Tax Lot 800, has been in industrial use for many years. FINDING: As the impacts to the 100-year floodplain due to the construction of this utility facility are minimal, no dedication of open land is required, and no pedestrian/bicycle plan is required. Therefore, this standard is met. Demarcation of Semi-Public and Private Spaces for Crime Prevention: Section 18.360.090.A.9 Structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas, and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility. The entire easement area will be defined as private space by a 6-foot chain link fabric fence, which will provide adequate protection for crime prevention. However, in accordance with comments from the City's Operation Utility Manager, the property Owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). FINDING: This standard is not met. In order to meet the standard the applicant shall meet the following condition: CONDITION:The property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). The applicant shall submit any revisions to the location of the proposed fence for approval by the Planning Division and the Utility Manager. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.360.090.A.10 The location of windows, interior laundry and service areas, and mailboxes be located to prevent crime so that areas vulnerable to crime can be observed by others. Exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall- be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer has submitted comments that they have no objection to the proposal as submitted. FINDING: This standard is met. Public Transit: Section 18.360.090.A.11 Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route. Facilities that may be required after City and Tri-Met review are: (1) Bus stop shelters; (2) Turnouts for buses; and (3) Connecting paths to the shelters. The subject site fronts SW 74th Avenue which is not a Tri-met transit route, therefore, this standard is not applicable. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 16 OF 19 FINDING: This standard is not applicable. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.360.090.A.12 All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745. In addition to the open space and recreation requirements of subsection 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. The landscape requirements are addressed under Section 18.530.2 and Chapter 18.745 in this decision. FINDING: This standard has not been met, however, the applicant can satisfy the standard by meeting the conditions as listed under Section 18.530.2 in this decision. Drainage: Section 18.360.090.A.13 All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted master drainage plan. This standard is addressed by the City Engineer under the public facility concerns in this decision. Provision for the Disabled: Section 18.360.90.14 All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective on January 26, 1992. All parking areas shall be provided with the required numbers and sizes of disabled person parking spaces as specified by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards. All disabled person parking spaces shall be signed and marked on the pavement as required by these standards. Comments from the Building Division indicate that they have no objection to the project as proposed. Any ADA requirements will be specified by the Building Division. FINDING: This standard is met. D. IMPACT STUDY: Section 18.390.040.B.e Requires that the applicant shall include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant did not submit an impact study. FINDING: This standard has not been met. In order to meet this standard the applicant shall satisfy the following condition: CONDITION: The applicant shall provide an impact study as set forth in TDC Section 18.390.040.B.e for approval by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department. E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS: CHAPTER 18.810 The City of Tigard Development Review Engineer provided the following comments with regard to this project: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 17 OF 19 • 1 . The application shows that they will use an existing driveway. Therefore, no additional driveways shall be created without them obtaining a permit from Engineering for additional work in the ROW. 2. The project will not be adding significant impervious areas to the site. It appears to be less than 200 square feet. Therefore, no additional onsite stormwater provisions are necessary. USA's generic letter, dated October 2, 2000, is irrelevant in this case. No water quality facility is warranted due to the very minimal increase in impervious area. In addition, hydraulic and hydrological analysis of the storm conveyance system in NOT necessary. 3. The plans do not indicate such, but if the applicant needs to perform ANY work in the public ROW, they must obtain a permit from Engineering for this work. SECTION VIII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments. Currently, City of Tigard owns and operates an existing fire hydrant located within the ublic right-of-way/P.U.E. at this property. Property owner/applicant shall ensure a minimum of 3'-0" clearance around the existing fire hydrant (i.e. proposed fence maybe in conflict). City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed this application and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. AGENCY COMMENTS Unified Sewerage Agency: Comments are addressed and incorporated in the Public Facility Concerns Section of this decision. U.S. Fish & Wildlife: No comments were received. U.S Army Corps of Engineers: No comments were received. Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL): A letter dated July 21, 2000 was received stating that no state removal of fill permit is required for the proposed activity. The DSL concurs with the applicant's finding that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek (Tax Lot 900) does not meet wetland criteria. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): No comments were received. ICI Cable: No comments were received. NW Natural Gas: No comments were received. PGE: Reviewed this proposal and has no objections to it. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. R/R: No comments were received. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006-AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 18 OF 19 SECTION X. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 17, 2000 AND EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 1, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 . may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 31, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. October 17, 2000 PREPARED Y: Karen Perl Fox DATE Associate Planner October 17, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe dorff DATE Planning Manager I curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-11dec.doc NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00011/SLR(WR)2000-00006—AT&T BROADBAND PAGE 19 OF 19 • / i LEXISTING ' , o R+ / z i. / s. / 4x / ' \ \ / - z 100 YEAR ELEVATION \\ • / f \ / PER FENA PANEL NO • / / 4,0276-00S DAIEO Y / / 3-1-82 Y 0 ` / / \'.. \ 0 t, .11 w-.• \\ YY1 N. — \6 1. / \ • ..., v.I. .....4. -j, litir.WVAng rare. I ....... . ''. I. 1 \ IL X411.T.radW 111 Z. -"---2- -.1F--- ` ; ' ro vA: w M. t i <f ; I a EASED SI.11.42 CREEK / R ---n \ Z \\ aear i g C 1 \ II e""ii"-1\ r.r i ,u I t r+wu�1 er'"�i+'A� L r.r I -. �. f Me 1 N canw.cr .::"i �1 � 3Rw. l, i t ....._� I K.L V Q\�\\�\\� _�I •t �I '�TOPaeANK� � I nom},._.—._._.—i.L ,—._.___ _.__._. \ • / J■ j j I 0 ' O \ I ; LROR„,,,EEK RR • I . t CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-0001 I/SLR2000-00006 CITY Of TIGARD SITE PLAN N AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES (Map is not to scale) • • 7 1 iii C11-1-Di LLI-0-10 �� r� (��yAAA CITY of TIGARD la ECEO:1 �� .� �•�� GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ' 91.. '�F,� VICINITY MAP Oi •• ‘7; a SD R2000-00011 1 ' WEAVER SLR2000-00006 16-3 P E wY n I P — AT&T BROADBAND "'0) CABLE VAULTS J \ .M, p , f BONITA RD i.ii SIT o a O . • N rA W s.. 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet a CARDINAL LN 1"=378 feet 4' i City of Tigard — Information on this map is for general location only and F, should be verified with the Development Services Division. • �. 131ar,SW OH 9llBlvd Tigard,OR 97223(503)639-4171 -_O �.. MEW hltp:!/www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2000;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR EXHIBIT B David DeVoist SDR2000-00011/SLR2000-00006 Fraley/Stricker Architects AT&T BROADBAND CABLE & INTERNET 120 Lakeside SERVICES Seattle, WA 99122 BHK Properties, LLC. 14280 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ��` cm Of TIGARD Community/Development SiapingA Better Community STATE OAF o EgON ) County of Washington )ss. City of'Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-0001 I/SLR2000-00006 -AT&T BROADBAND AND INTERNET SERVICES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./NameReference/ ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: i I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: (File No./Name Reference) (Dale of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, m rka ed ibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit ,on October 17,2 00 an• • ,:osited i► the United States Mail on October 17,2000, postage prepaid. . ,o& r at -care• ''otice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / day o ':1[..... / r- /r ,z) OFFICIAL SEAL r I ' ' I I I ' !r;-1 ' JIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: , COMMISSION NO.326578 `I MY MISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00011 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 i� CITY OF TIGARD AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/7/2000 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND CABLE AND INTERNET SERVICES CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00011 Sensitive Lands Review/Water Resource Overlay (SLR) SLR2000-00006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of the following land use applications: 1. A secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high-speed data and telephone signals. 2. Determination of Sensitive Lands and Water Resource Overlay Review APPLICANT: David DeVoist OWNERS: BHK Propertie§, LLC. Fraley/Stricker Architects 14280 SW 72" Avenue 120 Lakeside Tigard, OR 97224 Seattle, WA 99122 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park; I-P. ZONING DESIGNATION: I-P: Industrial Park District. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 800. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 17, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER I , 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 31, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Karen Perl Fox at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 7 � '2/' e• '• a l '-'-------- s\ ...64.•pt.na ' \ • C, • r. o • _— NI �runte 4.-- v �'[l y :j WIMP ., 1-`' I `--- :1:1' , , b cia, o �� c._,-,-r( ' _ _ _ .h CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-000I I/SLR2000-00006 SITE PLAN N AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES Ma•Is not to scale 'ilt✓ \ VICINITY MAP y SDR2000 00011 _S,E.,WR \\ SLR2000 00006 -= �- AT&T BROADBAND i \\ _I CABLE VAULTS BONITA-. ' r--- A . 1 H 1 SIT- — �• � liz N ° _t 4 \G_RDIWLL LN .:. ..� ii - . MI 1 _ 1 .4.. Y i� . / __ ..►... 5DX -i/ • EXHIBIT B 2S 112AC-02400 2S 112AC-01200 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14725 SW 72ND 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S 112AC-00800 2S 112AC-00900 BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S 112AC-00700 2S 112BA-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC LURMANN LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 1185 TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 112AC-00600 2S 1128 D-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M 14280 SW 72ND AVE Go CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST TIGARD,OR 97224 CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112BD-00700 2S112AC-00400 BOOTH-HEYDON LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1185 BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 14480 YORBA CHINO,CA 91710 2S 112BD-00100 2S112AC-00200 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1890 17010 SW WEIR RD GRESHAM,OR 97030 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112AC-02300 2S 112AC-00500 C&C DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC BY DELTA FIRE INC 17010 SW WEIR RD PO BOX 4010 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 112B 0-00200 2S112AC-01500 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G& PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ROBERTA A 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 14760 SW 76TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112BD-00600 2S 112AC-01000 CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 11720 SW LYNN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00300 2S 112AC-01100 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES PO BOX 23962 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 112AC-02500 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES BY CP TAX SERVICES 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 WALNUT CREEK,CA 94596 2S 112AB-01600 SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 324 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112AB-01300 TENNANT INVESTORS PO BOX 1658 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S 112BA-06200 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00801 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AB-01700 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112AB-01901 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S 112AB-01900 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 76th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 79th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 s. A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD of noARo Community'Devetoprnent Shaping (Better Community STATE OE Ok,EGOW ) County ofWashington )ss. City of Tward ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2000-0001 I/SLR2000-00006 -AT&T BROADBAND CABLE - AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: - AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) • City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: PT / - AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ii City of Tigard Planning Director ▪ Tigard Hearings Officer ii Tigard Planning Commission ▪ Tigard City Council 7 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR:17-/ I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: _ (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: L. I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A cop of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, m ed xhibit "A", was,mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit" ", on Se)tomb 27 200 I -and • -posited in the United States Mail on September 27,2000, postage prepaid. ': orL- P- . 11W-1 par:d otice) Subscribed and sworn/aff et Before me on the /l) day of , 2000. L. i24,; OFFICIAL SEAL ¢�. :`-x" SHERMAN S.CASPER digeltorgrOr �`� NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON `llf COMMISSION NO.323409 My Commission Expires: /3 204.3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 • NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI _ _DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EMU THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O CITY OF T TIGARD Community Development Shaping l Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: September 27, 2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-0001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 FILE NAME: AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES PROPOSAL: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10-foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 35-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74th Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2000. All comments should be directed to Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 13. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL E JME A PART OF THE PERMANE, PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Planning Commission must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." VICINITY MAP F " SDR2000-00011 SLR2000-00006 010P? YIEAWY AT&T BROADBAND CABLE VAULTS BONITA RD NAPA CT N CARDINAL LN .•• 15115 MO Ma c> r I gard NrI e P spe2ocio EXHIBIT B 25112AC-02400 2S 112AC-01200 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14725 SW 72ND 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S 112AC-00800 2S 112AC-00900 BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S112AC-00700 2S112BA-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC LURMANN LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 1185 TIGARD,OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 112AC-00600 2S 112B D-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M 14280 SW 72ND AVE Go CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST TIGARD,OR 97224 CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112BD-00700 2S 112AC-00400 BOOTH-HEYDON LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1185 BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 14480 YORBA CHINO,CA 91710 2S 112BD-00100 25112AC-00200 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1890 17010 SW WEIR RD GRESHAM,OR 97030 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112AC-02300 2S 112AC-00500 C&C DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC BY DELTA FIRE INC 17010 SW WEIR RD PO BOX 4010 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S1 12B D-00200 2S 112AC-01500 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G& PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ROBERTA A 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 14760 SW 76TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 12B D-00600 2S 112AC-01000 CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 11720 SW LYNN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00300 2S 112AC-01100 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES PO BOX 23962 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 • 2S 112AC-02500 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES BY CP TAX SERVICES 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 WALNUT CREEK,CA 94596 2S 112AB-01600 SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 324 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 2S112AB-01300 TENNANT INVESTORS PO BOX 1658 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112BA-06200 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00801 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AB-01700 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112AB-01901 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S 112AB-01900 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 2S 112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 • Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 76th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 91224 Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100th Avenue i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 19th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 CITY of TIGARD , GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 10 .\JANDMARKth AREA NOTIFIED 10 g = <t0` (000') irmi,istrn [tub 4 so • Gt — ;�4 � 4. % �� SDR2000-00011 ,II q tsmepootoo OZ Ili . , G -.T SLR2000-00006 • LL i a-l•i, 9setm1 WR AT&T BROADBAND \/) ` -, CABLE VAULTS / 1511111801800 ■ - _ — 251120001900 281126811900 C0 i 3t1M 23128e01901 751120801600 75100B0700 �U' BONITA RD J �- 1 101110000600 .,i 1i 2s1T:aco65ea =memo 701129000100 11,, 781126800700 23fl26800300 201128000700 7 �1, N 0)0 101116800801 ,� Y 11, 0 u p 75112uc02400 - Q Z 251170000900 151128001000 07 H 251178000600 751128000700 m O1 SITE c a - o A 7511Y6c0110U 251128002300 13 N 201120001200 N ■ \ \ 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 182126002500 C _ 1"=378 feet I I 751110000300 - •m 1371211801500 `. \ J . CARDINAL LN �'I'I alb City of Tigard .I Information on this map is for general location only and --I . ,.--/-J/ 1 should be verified with the Development Services Division. en 13125 SW Hall Blvd / "G� I Tigard OR 97d or (503)639-4777 http://wawi.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Sep 26,2000;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S112AC-02400 ' 2S112AC-01200 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14725 SW 72ND 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S1 12AC-00800 2S112AC-00900 BHK PROPERTIES LLC FANNO CREEK ACRES LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 26262 S MERIDIAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 AURORA,OR 97002 2S 112AC-00700 2S1 12BA-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC LURMANN LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE PO BOX 1185 TIGARD, OR 97224 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S 112AC-00600 2S1 12 B D-00300 BHK PROPERTIES LLC MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M 14280 SW 72ND AVE c/o CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST TIGARD, OR 97224 CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 12 B D-00700 2S 112AC-00400 BOOTH-HEYDON LLC NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1185 BY HARRINGTON IND PLASTICS LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 14480 YORBA CHINO,CA 91710 2S 112 B D-00100 2S1 12AC-00200 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA NATIONAL SAFETY CO PO BOX 1890 17010 SW WEIR RD GRESHAM, OR 97030 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S 112AC-02300 2S 112AC-00500 C&C DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL SAFETY CO INC BY DELTA FIRE INC 17010 SW WEIR RD PO BOX 4010 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 112BD-00200 2S 112AC-01500 CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G& PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES ROBERTA A 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 14760 SW 76TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112BD-00600 2S 112AC-01000 CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES CORNUTT HOWARD L JR 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 11720 SW LYNN PORTLAND,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00300 2S 112AC-01100 EMPIRE BATTERIES INC PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES PO BOX 23962 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S112AC-02500 ' PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES BY CP TAX SERVICES 1371 OAKLAND BLVD STE 200 WALNUT CREEK,CA 94596 2S112AB-01600 SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP PO BOX 324 COLUMBIA CITY, OR 97018 2S112AB-01300 TENNANT INVESTORS PO BOX 1658 PORTLAND,OR 97207 2S112BA-06200 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00801 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 2S112A8-01700 TIGARD CITY OF 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112AB-01901 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE, OR 97222 2S 112AB-01900 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARK INC 2106 SE OCHOCO ST MILWAUKIE, OR 97222 2S 112AB-01800 WASHINGTON COUNTY FACILITIES MGMT-ADMIN 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 HILLSBORO,OR 97123 Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 76`h Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100`h Avenue i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 79`h Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 91281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 91224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS ROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! CITY of TIGARD �' 1 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ;r� AREA NOTIFIED IBS 0, (500') do -�.ANQmARK .Zan gitil3 4 ,pT 2 0 ti //1C , tslv9aoszoo �� For: David De Voist �,°s 1, - Fraley/Stricker Architects !�� .,,•�� LL (206) 324-4800 a 0 Re: 14645 74th Avenue WEAVER �' WY SUBJECT (251 12AC, 800) • • ',„„„� tS112ABO1800 SITE 4\ \ 2S111ABOIS00 15111AB01300• C�tSS J 1 731126A00300 251178801901 -_--- 25112AB01700 �" _J I," r BONITA RD �� _ 2S112AC0os00 �, 2441C00500 251129000200 S — 251129000100 YsnYACeoioo 2S1121000300 - 101129000109 'a4\ V Y�� Y5112AC0040� 151119000881 i T O W 2S712ACO2400 Q I 201119000600 23112A000900 25112AC01000 CO 2511211000200 m n A ,1 L______L i C . 251120001100 251126007200 5 251120.001200 . IR i - \ f 0 200 400 600 Feet 2S112ACOT500 CV=418 feet M 7511/AC01500 ,;, r I � i CARDINAL LN ho o. III - - —� 1 !!2 City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and f � should be verified with the Development Services Division. \0:..,4 13125 SW Half Blvd Tigard,OR 97223• (503)639-4171 y I http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Feb 7, 2000;C:lmagic'MAGIC03.APR 00a . 1"f • 2S112AB-01300 2S 112AB-01600 BONITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS SUNDAY SCHOOL FELLOWSHIP 7333 SW BONITA RD PO BOX 324 PORTLAND,OR 97223 COLUMBIA CITY,OR 97018 S112AB-01701 2S112AB-01800 TI • -• OF WASHINGTON COUNTY 1312 •LL 111 SE WASHINGTON ST MS42 ARD,OR •7223 .HILLSBORO,OR 97123 25 112AB-01900 t 112AB-01901 TRI-COUNTY INDUSTRIAL TRI- •, TY •USTRIAL 2106 SE OCHOCO ST 2106 S •: 0 ST MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 AUKIE,OR 9 22 • 2S 112AC-00200 2S 112AC-00300 NATIONAL SAFETY CO MOORE ROD A ET AL 17010 SW WEIR RD do EMPIRE BATTERIES INC BEAVERTON,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112AC-00400 2S 112AC-00500 NATIONAL SAFETY CO SKOURTES JOHN R 14480 YORBA 17010 SW WEIR ROAD CHINO,CA 91710 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S112AC-00600 2- 12AC-00700 BHK PROPERTIES LLC BHK •'•PE: - S LLC 14280 SW 72ND AVE 14281 -•! •AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 ARD,OR 97224 2S 112AC-00800 2S 112AC-00801 BH -OPE: S LLC T RD CI OF 1428' :• D AVE 13125 ALL T ARD,OR 9 • 4 ARD,OR 9 23 2S112AC-00900 2 12AC-01000 KNHS DEVELOPMENT CO PACIFI • TY ASSOCIATES 26262 S MERIDIAN RD 153 • SE*.•IA PKWY#300-WMI AURORA,OR 97002 ••RTLAND,OR 97 • 2S112AC-01100 • 112AC-01200 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES KNHS :. E •-MENT CO 15350 SW SEQUOIA PKWY#300-WMI 2626 • 'IAN RD PORTLAND,OR 97224 .11 RORA,OR 971s- 12AC-01500 2S 112AC-02300 PACI RE• ASSOCIATES C&C DEVELOPMENT 1535' :• - a •IA PKWY#300-WMI PO BOX 4010 •RTLAND,OR 9 24 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S112AC-02400 2S112AC-02500 ALPHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION 14725 SW 72ND 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLOOR SOUTH TIGARD,OR 97224 OMAHA,NE 68102 2S112BA-00300 = 2BA-06201 LURMANN LLC TIGARD .. OF PO BOX 1185 131 . WH•. LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 T ARD,OR 97223 2S112BD-00100 2S112BD-00200 BOROS STEFAN A&FIVIA CASTLEBERRY ALBERT G& PO BOX 1890 14760 SW 76TH AVE GRESHAM,OR 97030 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1128D-00300 2S112BD-00600 MALO ROBERT W VIOLET M CORNUTT JACQUELINE TRUST 11720 SW LYNN 11720 SW LYNN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112BD-00700 BOOTH-HEYDON LLC PO BOX 1185 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 RECEIVED PLANNING FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS • FEB 052000 A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 100 XYOFTIGARD SEATTLE , WASHINGTON 981 22 TEL 206/324-4800 FAX 206/322-2875 February 1, 2000 City of Tigard,Oregon Attn: Patty Lunsford Administrative Specialist 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ms Lunsford Per a pre-application meeting with Karen Fox on 12/7/99, it was stated that I needed a site development review. One of the criteria for this review is a neighborhood meeting. Karen Fox said that you are the contact person to supply me with the names and address for all parties with- in a 500' distance for the proposed property line. Enclosed is the survey with Tax Lot# and legal description. Property location: 14645 SW 74th Ave Please give me a call with questions. David De Voist (206) 324-4800 (206) 9992401 Tha ks - 0"-'1/7/ David De Voist WILL CALL/PICK 'JP Fill out this form completely and attached it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL/ PICK UP area at the Front Counter and file in the appro•riate alphabetical slot by last). e/c •any. TO: aV1L ! ' /j ` COMPANY NAME: ,� jetlf I r, ' ortiuv hie DOCUM T NAME: i, " tj, b /14 Ail E4' fenI FRO : ,1 i ,' DEPARTMENT: , 4w ^ DATE TO WILL CALL: 41-1 FEE: //ay."- .. f If the document is not picked up within 5 working days of the "DATE TO WILL CALL", the document will be returned to the originator. RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR DATE: 9_Nye wd /5 ' di'&14 sx-fr ,, „ td r— .e,Li fin SAC12 FeXIJsAAirbill N" ' b I,8 2 8 5 9 3 7 3 5 3 Form. a-15 _ 1 From a. m a 4a Express Package Service Packages upto 150/lox Sender's FedEx Delivery commitment maybe later in some areas. Date Account Number 1118--4758-4 ❑FedEx PriorityOvemight FedEx Standard Overnight ❑FedEx First Overnight Next business morning Nee business afternoon Earliest next business morning delivery to select locations Sender's 206 324-4800 Name Phone( ) ❑FedEx 2Day* O FedEx Express Saver* Second business day Third business day FedEx Mi letter Rate not available Minimum s'One-pound rate Company FRALEY STRICKER ARCHITECTS 4b Express Freight Service Packages over 150 lbs. Delivery commitment maybe later in some areas. ❑FedExlDaz Freight' ❑tectrb DayFreight ❑FedEx3DayFreight Nee business ay Second business day Third businea aV Address 120 LAKESIDE AVE STE 100 •cell forcommaoon. Dept/Floor/suite/Room P kaging •Declared value lime$500 SEATTLE WA 98122 m City Sole 2IP dEx Letter* ❑ FedEx Pak' ❑Other Pkg. n Poke,and cusmmer pkp& E 2 Your Internal Billing Reference Rrst24 characters will weer on invoice. 6 Special Handling 3 To SahadeyDelivery ftrhyDsYwry HOIDWeekdsy HOLD Saturday 2 ❑Avaiable for Fed&Pnodty ❑AaslalYlorred&Preeoy ❑atFedExLocation ❑at FedEx Location •rr Recipients Dve ight and Feder 2Day IMMO/1 adeetZPmdas Not available with Available for red&Priority -iq Name David Devoist Phone( 206324- 4800 to select ZIP codes FedEx Frst Overnight Overnight and Fed&2Day c - to select locations SP this tht'pmem coaaean daeeeruus goods? Dne boz mcst,e checFad I o Company Fraley/Stricker Architects No ❑yes ❑ yes L office a As par atbchad Shipper's Declaration ory cs,9,UN lab kg a Shippers Declaration not required m cm El Cargo 2. 120 Lakeside Suite 100 angeus Goods omit shipped in Fed&packaging. Cargo Aircraft Only Address 7 Payment Willits 0 co We cannot deliver to PO.boxes or PD.ZIP codes. Dept/Floor/Suite/Room toter IOU Acct.No or Credit Ceid Na.aelow. ❑ Sender Section Recipient Third Party Credit Card ECash/Check will be billed. , l//�� /� To'HOLD'at FedEx lucaden, FedEx Acct.No I I I �" y' / Y pnm FedEx address here. Credt Card No. 1 ill ►I I _[7 City Seattle State WA ZIP 98122 Total Pl rages lJ Total DealuidVint NEW Peel and Stick FedEx USA Airbill 1{1 $ .OD See back for application instructions. tOur liabiley is limrted to S1C13 unieSs you declare a higher value.See back for dank NAOMI Only Questions?Call 1.800•Go•FedEx®(800-463-3339) 8 Release Signature syn ro aumn ve deti ayw Mau obtaining signature. Vises our Web site at www.fedex.com By using this Airbill you agree to the service conditions on the back of this Airbill By signing you authorize us to deliver this shipment without obtaining a signature 359 and in our current Service Guide,including terms that limit our liability. a end agree to indemnM and hold us harmless from any resulting cl aims. 012420556" SRP 1299•Rer.Data 11B8•Part et 548135.6:1994-98 Fed&•NiWiED IN U A Terms And Conditions Definitions On this Airbill,"we,""our,"and"us"refer to • We won't be liable: You may call our Customer Service department at Federal Express Corporation,its employees,and agents."You" for your acts or omissions,including but not limited to 1.800•Go•FedEx®(800-463-3339)to report a claim;however, and"your"refer to the sender,its employees,and agents. improper or insufficient packing,securing,marking,or you must still file a timely written claim. Agreement To Terms By giving us your package to addressing,or those of the recipient or anyone else with Within 90 days after you notify us of your claim,you must deliver,you agree to all the terms on this Airbill and in our an interest in the package send us all the information you have about it.We aren't current Service Guide,which is available on request.You also obligated to act on any claim until you have paid all —if you or the recipient violates any of the terms of our agree to those terms on behalf of any third party with an Agreement transportation charges,and you may not deduct the amount of interest in the package.If there is a conflict between the your claim from those charges. Service Guide and this Airbill,the Service Guide will control. —for loss or damage to shipments of prohibited items If the recipient accepts your package without noting any No one is authorized to change the terms of our Agreement. —for loss,damage,or delay caused by events we cannot damage on the delivery record,we will assume the package Responsibility For Packaging And Completing control,including but not limited to acts of God,perils of was delivered in good condition.For us to process your claim, Airbill You are responsible for adequately packaging y our the air,weather conditions,acts of public enemies,war, you must make the original shipping cartons and packing goods and properly filling out this Airbill.If you omit the number strikes,civil commotions,or acts of public authorities available for inspection. of packages and/or weight per package,our billing will be with actual or apparent authority. Delivery to Residential Locations Shipments to based on our best estimate of the number of packages we Declared Value Limits residential locations using FedEx Express Saver may be received and/or an estimated"default"weight per package •The highest declared value allowed for FedEx Letter and delivered without obtaining the recipient's signature. as determined by us. FedEx Pak shipments is$500. Responsibility For Payment Even if you give us Rght To Inspect We may,at our option,open and different payment instructions,you will always be primarily •For 00 unless leyour shipments,the highest contains declared items value"extraordinary allowed is inspect deliv your packages before or after you give them to us responsible for all delivery costs,as well as any cost we incur �-�unless your package contains items of"extraordinary to deliver. in either returning your package to you or warehousing it value,"in which case the highest declared value allowed Right Of Rejection We reserve the right to reject a is$500. pending disposition, shipment when such shipment would be likely to cause delay Limitations ns On Our Liability •Items of"extraordinary value"include shipments containing or damage to other shipments,equipment,or personnel;or if And Liabilities Not Assumed such items as artwork,jewelry,furs,precious metals,nego- the shipment is prohibited by law;or if the shipment would tiable instruments,and other items listed in our Service Guide. violate any terms of our Airbill or our current Service Guide. •Our liability in connection with this shipment is limited to the •You may send more than one package on this Airbill and fill C.O.D.Services C.D.D.SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE lesser of your actual damages or$100,unless you declare a in the total declared value for all packages,not to exceed WITH THIS AIRBILL.If C.O.D.Service is required,please use higher value,pay an additional charge,and document your the$100,$500,or$50,000 per package limit described above. a Federal Express C.O.D.Airbill. actual loss in a timely manner.You may pay an additional (Example: 5 packages can have a total declared value of up charge for each additional$100 of declared value.The Air Transportation Tax Included A federal excise declared value does not constitute,nor do we provide,cargo to$250,000.)In that case,our liability is limited to the actual tax when required by the Internal Revenue Code on the air liability insurance. value of the package(s)lost or damaged,but may not exceed transportation portion of this service,if any,is paid by us. the maximum allowable declared value(s)or the total declared Money-Back Guarantee In the event of untimely •In any event,we will not be liable for any damage,whether value,whichever is less.You are responsible for proving the direct,incidental,special,or consequential in excess of the actual loss or damage. delivery,Federal Express will,at your request and with some declared value of a shipment,whether or not Federal Express Filing A Claim YOU MUST MAKE ALL CLAIMS IN limitations,refund or credit all transportation charges.See had knowledge that such damages might be incurred current Service Guide for more information. including but not limited to loss of income or profits. WRITING and notify us of your claim within strict time limits Part.154813$•Rev.11/98 set out in the current Service Guide. FRALEY/ STRICKER • ARCHITECT • 1C L _1 0Y 4RAM@PAU Lid A PRQFESSIONAL SERVICE CORP....-tTION 120 LAKESIDE SUITE 100 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO.q (206) 324-4800 ATTENT I�N �v !?3/°- 59 FAX (206) 322-2875 TA.:r-T-Y L u tiJ S-'o 2D TO RE: ) TT of Ti GA AD 'RP QT Y WA�sS 42_77-,e PTTr / / RECEIVED PLANNING / Q i,cc,.4 i y� S /3/2 S tAI L-z- et ixf 74- L-e e I a.a ©1- -- FEB 1 0_ 2300 c7A D Oe 9�ZZ-3 CITY OF TIGARD WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: > ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ amples ❑ Specifications g k' e a3 °a ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ;/ 2.4,06, ( CWezk * 3a952- z/9/Zo"° l e--46f7 or R Uos� Lrre-�- p�� F s THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution 'As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS y .�._ ► .o.: ._ ►_ L. .i _ A._ l44.116— // , •5C-0 , exitz.e pfLe paid 41 .cjc L441 Fe va- "r'.44.6.- 7t -' of dD Dv S p-c) .r Vora- (4Aki c f-A-7-rT- . " vote -� Y/ COPY TO ai SIGNED: r If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. February 1, 2000 City of Tigard,Oregon Attn: Patty Lunsford Administrative Specialist 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Ms Lunsford Per a pre-application meeting with Karen Fox on 12/7/99, it was stated that I needed a site development review. One of the criteria for this review is a neighborhood meeting. Karen Fox said that you are the contact person to supply me with the names and address for all parties with- in a 500' distance for the proposed property line. Enclosed is the survey with Tax Lot# and legal description. Property location: 14645 SW 74th Ave Please give me a call with questions. David De Voist (206) 324-4800 (206) 9992401 Thanks David De Voist APPLICANT MATERIALS • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD REtXMalvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 APR 0 5 2000 KC Pig. GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: CITY OF TIGARD DATE OF PRE-APP.: 1 .I 1 A I I 15f vuc.(bkv%.4 f Property Address/Location(s): / '6 4.5- 5w 71zµ AU-e FOR STAFF USE ONLY Ax- Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 9s- I - (2_-16-x S 00 Case No.(s): sp t( Other Case No.(s): 5t-rC 2°0o- Gtaao(Q Site Size: L'O X b a Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Date: Address: Phone: City: jf Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: rJ24LE y/5'TR)C -fl iL >Ert7 lA w� Phone: �-32.9 .S/8� Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: /2 0 �g �d� City: 4.144-e_ CO A. Zip: 98-/Z2, ,4--fizj : avid De VD/S4-- CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:lcurpin\masters\sdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. ✓ Application Elements Submitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY [r Application Form QT Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): lot Plan /27,r p-Oe f es 4 4.f 1Z>f (#of copies based on pre-app check list) t c ox-4 • e bvs - -ma,u i 13( Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") firs- s'/ s • Lt -�' 'pj Er Applicant's Statement J ,, Il (#of copies based on pre-app check list) agiti L� '�"'" a'``` p�"" S°r vc�s El Construction Cost Estimate U Ooc) er se Information Card" 'A_ (Distributed/completed at application submittal ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999,999) $'x600.00 4S/19 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 Seitn.,1 11lUC L(LA-0-6 o List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this _ day of , 19 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 4e4.Nirez� Owner's Signature S27A. Fes12- Owner's Signature 2 RECEIVED PLANNING (1A)ATE_ t2 e 66 0 n 5 A MAY 12 2000 SENSITIVE LANDS -TYPE -71 CITY OF TIGAR 4""'el I, PEA-0-INTYPEIWAPPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location: i q (o S/S Si-c-; 9 y 7-11 S T 'Ti <,'z 0 ,q 2z y FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 2S 1 f �' I C -OOgoO 1r `n vv1'l un Lkorik u.( 5012dlx2v- G7U(v Case No.(s): ,SL/ . 600- dod0c Site Size: Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Application Accepted By: Address: Phone: Date: City: Zip: Applicant*: r t' [-vac kerrL be lems, Date Determined To Be Complete: / yy S►- r•-� Address: /Z U 4S�c a 'AU a Phone( r,)32V 4/$oc) Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: c T>L t r wA Zip: 9f3/2„-z____ When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession CIT Area: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. Rev.11/26/98 is\curpin\masters\sla.doc The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Sensitive ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Lands Permit to allow (please be specific): ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'12"x 11") ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Administrative) $ 745.00 (Hearing's Officer) $1,240.00 1 t'e r .3b pci %t f ' List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this / 2 day of M;417 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 12 2000 SENSITIVE LANDS —TLcp-c - CITY OF TIGARD Agl- TYp o APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location: l 4 ¢S S`�' ��•Ti t •A/2.1, Li 4 qq Z 2 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): a5//;,A-0— DO goo caw Inc t rin u4 Case No.(s): SORa D1)- 000 I Site Size: Other Case No.(s): C L A� ZI,vU—avvoCp Receipt No.: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: Application Accepted By: Address: Phone: Date: City: Zip: Applicant*: FRIA Ltr r/ r2.ILk&-2 1.A„ ,p Ue WIS./ Date Determined To Be Complete: reC -► Oil 4.- Address: /20 Phone: got. 32-9, c f e' - Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: et— -t (,_- !� Zip: FR/ z__ When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession CIT Area: with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. Rev.11/26/98 is\curpin\masters\sla.doc The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Sensitive ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Lands Permit to allow (please be specific): ❑ Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ❑ Site/Plot Plan (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/:"x 11") ❑ Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee (Administrative) $ 745.00 (Hearing's Officer) $1,240.00 1 <'r_ / (f / GAL List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this l 2- day of 144A7 , ©o0 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:04/05/2000 14:18 User:front Station: 02 Operator: DEB Rcpt No: 0001183 Date: 04/05/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 860.00 Name: FRALEY/STRICKER ARCHITECTS Cash: 0.00 Address: 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE STE 100 Check: 860.00 SEATTLE, WA 98122 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 860.00 (.1_,/ 1)._,IIL c, ct, -144) 42444.(}4.4" U (P` 5' 6u A\ • CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping_3 Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 12/7/2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00011 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 2000-00006 FILE TITLE: AT&T BROADBAND & INTERNET SERVICES APPLICANT: Fraley/Stricker Architects OWNER: BHK Propertie§, LLC 120 Lakeside Avenue 14280 SW 72' Avenue Seattle, WA 99122 Tigard, OR 97224 Attn: David DeVoist PHONE/FAX: 206-324-4800 REQUEST: This proposal is for a secondary hub facility (cable vault) to house optical transport equipment for distribution of Cable TV, high speed data and telephone signals. This above-ground vault has a 6-foot x 10-foot footprint and will sit within a 60-foot x 20-foot easement. The vault is proposed to be located outside of the required 355-foot front yard setback, approximately 50 feet from the front property line along SW 74t Avenue. Two underground utility vaults are also proposed, each 4 feet, 8 inches in length x 7 feet wide x 5 feet deep. A second future vault location is proposed to be located just outside of the 35-foot front yard setback. The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map indicates designated floodplain and wetlands on the site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Determination from David Evans and Associates with findings that the designated Wetlands are off-site. The applicant has also submitted evidence that the minimum elevation of the proposed site is above the 100-year floodplain. LOCATION: 14645 SW 74th Avenue; WCTM 2S112AC, Tax Lot 00800. The project is located west of SW 74th Avenue, and south of SW Bonita Road. COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial Park, and Water Resource Overlay District. ZONE: I-P APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.775, 18.790, 18.795, 18.797, and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: 7 TYPE I 111 TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 _DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER I I, 2000 HHEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM 1 CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 1:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 13, 2000 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION _J 0 VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ WETLANDS REPORT E SITE PLAN ® ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ GRADING PLANS ❑I NARRATIVE E UTILITY PLANS J OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Karen Perl Fox, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 315 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: A-1 s I (jr FOR Date: S I l LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS [ C MPLETE ❑INCOMPLETE -,/ Existing and proposed contours shown? Lij"� Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑Yes E No Adjacent parcel grades shown? STREET ISSUES a Right-of-way clearly shown? [r Centerline of street clearly shown? [ Name of street(s) shown? Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? LatAA Profiles of proposed streets EH Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? ,Ef*lA Traffic study required/submitted? a Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? [l' Check widths proposed on public streets • __Elt,)IA Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ commercial driveway entrance required. ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES — NI A ❑ Existing/proposed lines? ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES NA 1 A ❑ Existing/proposed lines? • ❑ Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES --NlA Stoma ._ tiC-Rt—S ti ❑ Existing/proposed lines? ❑ Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality provided? M �t� ❑ Water quality facility shown on plan? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement?. ❑ Stubs to adjacent properties required? ❑ Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:\eng\brianNnasters\public facility plan checklisl.doc CITY OF TIGARD May 5, 2000 OREGON Fraley/Strucher Architects 120 Lakeside Avenue Seattle, WA 98112 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal SDR2000-00011 AT&T Broadband Equipment Vault To Whom it May Concern: Staff has reviewed the information and has deemed your application submittal as incomplete due to the lack of information provided. In order for staff to proceed with your request for SDR approval, please provide the following detailed information: • A Service Provider Letter from USA, which states that USA has reviewed and concurs with your proposed site plan. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 317. Sincerely 414,, i Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner I:\curpl n\mathew\sdr\sdr2000-00011.acc. c: SDR2000-00011 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 August 10, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Fraley/Stricker Architects Attn: David Devoist 120 Lakeside Avenue Seattle, WA 98122 RE: AT&T Broadband SDR 2000-000011/SLR (WR) 2000-00006 Completeness letter as of 8/9/00 Dear David: The City of Tigard received your application re-submittal for Site Development Review on August 1, 2000 for the property located at 14645 SW 74th Avenue. This letter is to inform you that your application has been deemed complete, and scheduled for review. Staff has identified a tentative target date of September 27, 2000 for the decision on your project. Please note that this is a target date only and that a decision may be issued before or after that date. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Yours truly, en Perl Fox Associate Planner c: Ethan Rosenthal/David Evans and Associates Land Use Casefile: #SDR2000-000011 I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-11 acc.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 • Iiiiiillil i>` cs i< •tee •8b 11¢1 0 ,„:„.......„s AT&T ifs,-Iv„, M Q AT&T Broadband & Internet Services A 74th-BONITA 6 g U u - z GENERAL NOTES ONININIRAL ONIGUIR 4j G. W I. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. A. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FIELD LOCATIONS FOR ALL UTILITIES WITHIN 7. THE PROJECT"ANUr1L AND/OR SPECIFCAT!ONS SHALL DE A PART OF THESE THE YICNITY OF CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO DIGGING OR GRADING. m I l , 'DRAWINGS ANC CONTRACT DO`IMENT9. 5. CONTRACTOR TO LEVEL EXISTING,BADE UIITHN AREA OF EASEMENT AND * 3 LNLESS OTHERJISE INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS OR IN THE PROJECT ENSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AND ADJACENT PROPERTY. J. I. \/ MANUAL ANC 9.ECIFICATIC 4 AS BEING NIC.OR EXISTING.ALL ITEMS. 6. REPJSE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SHOULD DE COLLECTED IN AN ORDERLY RI MATERIALS.ETC.AND INSTALLATION OF THE SAME ARE A PART OF THE FASHION AND REMOVED FROM THE 917E IN THE SAYE MAKER CARE MUST BE n CONTRACT DE?'--NEB DT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. TAKEN TO KEEP AREAS AIROND BUILDINGS FREE OF DEBRIS. CONTRACTOR IS 4E a t 1 ANY ERRORS.AMBIGUITIES AND/OR OMISSIONS M THE DRAWINGS OR THE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO SITE CREATED BY HIS WORK AND SHALL i ` 1 9RECIFICATIONS SHALL 9E REPORTED TO THE A1�HITECT IMMEDIATELY IN MAKE ANT REPAIRS AS REQUIRED. 4 4\I y'R:'ING. 1. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE CT EpSEMEVT BOUNDARY UPON Q S //�\ PRIOR TO THE SUDMI591GN(,F BIDS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB COMPLETION OF COtlTRUCTIf( mq �/' `� - SITE AND DE KESPON$IBLE FOR ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS,AND Q H �\ :Hc7HFIRMING THAT THE WORK"AT DE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING MI�GFIANIri11�1 1L1Ci�(GAL H `1 THE CONSTRUCTION,ANY C15C:REPANCIES ARE TO DE BIEOIYGHT TO THE ATTENTION I. SEAL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS WITH UL LISTED AND FIRE �B 3 R g! OF THE IMPLEMENTATION ENCG NEER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING CODE APPROVED MATERIALS. H�X WITH S. SOLELY A CONVENIENCE TO THE OWIgR AND CONTRACTOR THE ARCHITECT 7" PROVIDE UL APPROVED FIRE Ex71NGU19HER9 4$REQUIRED BY'HE FIRE u VA i. MARSHAL.VERA-1'LOCATIONS OF FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WITH ARCHITECT AND I\ MAY INCLUDE DOCUMENTS PREPARED MY CERTAIN CONSULTANTS 4ND/OR FIRE MARSHAL.PROvIDE FIRE PROTECTION,IF REQUIRED BY LOCAL './ENO 'O NCORpORATC:THE RECOMMENDATIONS OP SAID CONSULTANTS AUTHORITIES,DURING CONSTRUCTION. AND/OR VENDORS INTO SAID MENTU PREPARED B'T THE ARCHITECT)WITHIN THE SET OF DOCUMENTS GIN,=D DT THE ARCHITECT.IT IS EXPRESSLY 3. PROVIDE TRENCHES/SORES TO ALLOW UNDERGROUND CONDUIT OF 74'TRANSITIONS TO UNDERSTOOD.'HAT BY SUCH ISSUANCE,THE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO LIABILITY 60'BURIAL DEPTH ON SPECIFIED LOCATION. REFILL TRENCH PER ARCHITECT'S FOR THE$ER/ICES FOR SAID CONSULTANTS AND/OR VENDORS. INSTRUCTIONS. MAINTAIN 17'SPACING DETLLEEN COMMUNICATION AND POWER CONDUITS. rl `^ • 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR 6 TRANSITION TO PVC COATED R"GS SWEEPS TO EXIT FROM BELOW GRADE AT BUILD!NCG. rT� r'— w 4L.BU'L C"C•'EP••QR'IEN7 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. r .. I COO7RDINATE CAREFULLY WITH LOCAL UTILITIES TO N9TALL NEW UTILITY • 1, M I T. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OONT4CT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY TRANSFOR!'TER ANC METER 19 �/G/ I EXCAVATION.GI'E'JUORK OR CONSTRUCTION. 6. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR EXACT NUMBER.SIZE AND ROUTE OF COMMUNICATION I--� A/ ! S. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LTE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL CONDUITS' E I 1� WO!RIC INCLUDING ADDITIONAL PERMITS AND COORDINATION OF T. COMMUNIC4TION CONDUITS BELOW EASEMENT ROAD SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED. y ` U CONTRACTORS. : A RI • 9. THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE I�SPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING FOR 2 v W F 4L_PERMITS,_!CENSE5, NSF:CTIONS.AND TESTING INDICATED ON THE PLANS 0 AND/OR BY 9PECIPICATIONS AND/OR REQUIRED BY ANY O.O ERNMENT AGENCY. CO 3 O I . CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE 4U NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, I y U ORDINANCES,RILES.REGULATIONS AND ORDERS OF ANY PERTINENT PUBLIC .. hh,, // \ 4UUTIgRITY REARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE U . w u W J II. AL_WORK ANC`'ATERIAL5 SHALL COFORM TO THE LATEST ADOPTED I..1 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS AMENDED,ALL ORDINANCES,THE pCp)� ^ 1..1 REGULATIONS OP THE CITY OR COUNTY WITH JURISDICTION,AND SPPECIAL R. g REQUIREMENTS ND'CATED N THE BUILDING 91MMART OR THESE GENERAL LOCATION M.P NOTES. 13 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL N ANY I N IS NOT G, ARY DEFINED AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED ABBREVIATIONS ill 3 MS BEFORE 9TARTNG JIORC ON ANY ITc7'18 NOT CLEARLY DEEMED OR { BEATIFIED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 13. ANY REVISION OR ADDITICNAL WORK REQUIRED BY TIE FIELD CONDITIONS OR 'T.I LOCAL GO✓ERNING AUTHCQ'T'.e5 SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF : lit S Q 8 I THE ARCHITEC'BEFORE PR.ZCCEEDING COWL CONCRETE 14" MINOR MODIFICATIONS ON DETAILS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOS SITE EXIST EXISTING DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS,AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAX MAXIMIIII • 3 PART CP THE JOUR( IS. ALL=RCS SHALL BE IN ACC'EDANCE WITH TIE PROVISION$CP THE UDC MN MINIMUM I REGARDING EARTHQUAKE PIHNG.LIGHTING FIXTURES AND MECHANICAL EQUIMENT" NEC NATIONAL BUILDING CODE ALL WORKS MAT BE N ACCC1KJANCE 1IMN LOCAL EARTHQUAKE CODES AND NIC NOT IN CONTRACT I I 91 (REGULATIONS. NT9 NOT TO SCALE K. ALL SIGNAGE 19 NOT A PART OF THIS CONTRACT.SIGN CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN SEPARATE APPROVALS AND PERMITS FROM GOVERNING AGENCIES THK THICK FOR SIGNS. URO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Z a Z i I It, AT COMPLETICN OP PROJECT NEW SPACES SHALL BE CLEANED AND IN WORKING ORDER PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. XFMAR TRANSFORMER _ F > i; U j S4-I'MET INDEX I N r; ° I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL iERFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ALL CONDITIONS AT QI tl \I C4 JOB SITE INCLUDING BUILDING AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE DISCREPANCIES COMMENCING MIST NO. !MIT DMGRIPfION 9 WORK AND SHALL BE RESP-T•5ELE FOR SAME. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL TI COVER SHEET(THIS SHEET/ G :.•,! DE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PIROCEEDNG WITH K THE WOR . 7 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THE PLOT OF THE SURVEY DRAWING AND LS LAND SURVEY • V 3 S EvETORS MARCiNGS AT THE SITE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUE NORTH. Al EASEMENT PLAN AND 917E PLAN PRO'• ,PRO..: E'•ANT DISC PANCT:5 501150 DETLLEEN THE SURVEY DRAWIING AND SURVEYOR'S 'OV MARKINGS"THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT. TIE CONTRACTOR Si A7 DETAILS • SHALL SARU'E SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT. El ELECTRICAL PLANS,DIAGRAMS G DETAILS 111:_E-SHEET 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND COMPLY LL1TH SAFETY REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS REQUIRED FOR i.CRKER9/AND PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.PROVIDE PROTECTION AS REQUIRED TO.05M.SIT ANY DAMAGE TO EXIURS HE CONTRACTOR WITHIN AND CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND T 1 ADJACENT TO.OD SITE WHERE DAMAGE OCCUR$,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPAIR OR REPLACE DAMAGED AREA AND/OR MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO .S THE OUNER'S APPROVAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST.THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL RELOCATE AS REQUIRED. a APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. OF SHEETS 5/8" IRON ROD LEGAL DESCRIPTION-PARENT PARCEL'. W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 5/8'IRON ROD N 89'32' 30' W PARCEL III: /1980 CW/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP j/ P#3113 A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 NEST. N 89'32'30' W OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TIGARD. COUNTY OF V Z i 367.45 WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED z C q5 AS FOLLOWS: i C 5/6'IRON R00 >. C1 I- l W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20, FANNO CREEK ACRE W W N C2 TRACTS AND RUNNING THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE > W \ 8 5/8•IRON ROD NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY W " PROPOSED PER 5/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP UNE OF THE OREGON ELECTRIC RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG W 1L r ' w 100 YEAR ELEVATION OTT OF PROPOSED PE SAID RAILROAD 362.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89.52' WEST A DISTANCE 0A CC O W F PER FEAR PANEL ON �JNfFETE OF 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD A F= a Z io DISTANCE OF 15.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82'52' WEST 40.1 FEET TO A V C 410276-005 DATED \ s POINT ON THE'WEST UNE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 1042, 'WHICH POINT IS CC C o 3-1-82�_ \ TAX LOT 800 �� NORTH O'03'EAST 345.95 FEET AND NORTH 89.52'EAST 387.2 FEET = = W o PARCEL 3 6'MAP-a�:SI\ FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20.FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS; <CL a 2 - Z \ 6"MAPLE O O` THENCE SOUTH 89'52'WEST 387.2 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 0.OS HEST ^ W j 7 TAX LOT 801 \\\\ \ \' \ I, \ C3 A DISTANCE OF 345.95 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. C 3 T 0 C - 3 N 6T 67 11'\E\� 11i 15� S/B'IRON ROD EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 179 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO B.E. TORPAN. Q 2 r C p� 3i.28 r t� ET UX,BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 5,1946 IN BOOK 255.PAGE 781. s ar \ E 'e - / w/YELLOw PLASTIC CAP d y o O. ? 5/8 IRON ROD\\ 7 moo \ �. MAPLE 'a� FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 5 FEET DEDICATED FOR 0 W.• _ 5 W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP `�6' ExTT1UOEp a•: \r- ,� 18.38 ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE } C Z V -- �LA,VD TECH INC.' ��'� y O} STORM CB NO.90-02165. M M 240.50 1 . 20 4 av�.�, ' TOP-90A7 I- ; 7 N 69'ST 11'E .442 `��.��67i�rrJir�I �AIE OVT.96.47 ALSO EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE PARCELS I. II AND III THAT PORTON ( TB'[nBRRr, DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR GREENWAY PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT / /�r ' RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE NO. 90-02164, MORE • 8"CHERR z4 Kt PT20e PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FANNO g•.ERRy I r W/TRANSFORMER CREIX� / � g 1 STREET LIGHT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,BEING A PORTON OF THAT 589'57'11'W TRACT OF LAND IN DEED TO PUGET DIE CASING CO. AS RECORDED IN TAX LOT 900 L DEED BOOK 759.PAGE 22, AND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST 60.00 I� ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, OF Ct =33't2' 00' T. ' THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF"IGARD, COUNTY OF O R =136.40 I WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON: L-79.04 \ n BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF SW rIIII11►��5 �� LC=N 18'45' 00' W I N - 2 77 94 I \ BONITA ROAD, (COUNTY ROAD NO. 736)AS ESTABLISHED IN C.S. 20387, SAIO POINT LOCATED FROM A BRASS CAP MARKING THE NORTH > • -4 ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 12.AND BEING SOUTH 00'08'27' 4 C2 D=2B'30' S6' I1n I a P. WEST 1349.18 FEET ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER OF SECTION R=788.20 ``-TOP OF 8 r 1/�1 o DIVISION UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING-DR-THE-SOUTH UNE OF S.W.-- �� L=7784 �• z> BONITA ROAD, (30 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER UNE VI` 0• LC=N 22'05 3T' W k ° THEREOF); THENCE NORTH 89'1T OS'EAST 56.34 FEET ALONG SAID Z< `:77.15 Z RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE TO THE FANNO CREEK 100 YEAR FL00D PLAIN UNE < '/ �^O+'m AT AN ELEVATION OF 135.00 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL; THENCE • m I FOLLOWING SAID FLOOD PLAIN UNE SOUTH 04'79. 11' WEST 5.74 FEET; !r7 21 S C3 G=0'41' 11' / 1,.., j THENCE SOUTH 34•23'O2•WEST 25.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26'12' O< z R=136.40 I ) _ 1'4 34'WEST 27.66 FEET THENCE SOUTH 15'52' 22'WEST 32.07 FEET; _ r L=1.63 _ - THENCE SOUTH or 78' 16'WEST 26.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'15' <Z i LC=1.63 3Y W 4 1 / ;U G<55'EAST 47.41 FEET: THENCE SOUTH o0'16'23•EAST 42.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07'50' 41'WEST 16.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54'29' 1.63 SCE: 1-=40' ` / BALL I 01'WEST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'27'20-WEST 11.90 FEET; CREEK 0 20 n0 80 I I THENCE SOUTH 04'30'32'EAST 18.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04'45' , Ee, 1 tY WEST 23.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44'12' 19'EAST 1643 FEET; 13 THENCE SOUTH 34'13' 23'EAST 17.79 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 60.27' 2, „"11 02'EAST 10.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76.24' 17'EAST 11.06 FEET; I IT:., I __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ THENCE SOUTH 79'50' 40•EAST 23.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH B4.16' e.;. 52'EAST 68.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH BT 06' 37'EAST 30.05 FEET; THENCE 64'41'39- EAST 20.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16'49'29'EAST i 1 11' / W//YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 26.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11'52' 05'EAST 26.55 FEET: THENCE i I K' LOT 20 'LAND TECH INC.' SOUTH 38'52' 37'EAST 34.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10'25' 26'EAST 5i FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS 27.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2T 20' 33"EAST 25.68 FEET TO A POINT x. '4. p CN A UNE 167.80 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 759. PAGE 22; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE EASEMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTH 89'46'45-WEST 240.50 FEET TO THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER -∎,',I L E G E N D A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12. OF SECTION DIVISION UNE THROUGH SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 00 O8' =14, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANCE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. WASHINGTON 27'EAST 455.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ��JT • CATCH BASIN COUNTY.OREGON BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL L THREE OF DOCUMENT NO. 97003555 DEED RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. SAID DOWN GUY ANCHOR PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: NOTES; FIRE HYDRANT BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL THREE SAID CORNER I. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS g ALSO BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF S.W. 74TH AVENUE; c -.11 • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED THENCE SOUTH 89•s7. 11'WEST ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID PARCEL COUNTY SURVEY 27.640. THREE A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'02' 49' WEST 20.00 3 o- POWER POLE FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'57 11'EAST 59.26 FEET TO SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. DEA IS NOT yy THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A NON TANGENT. 136.40 FOOT RADIUS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES 11 `.11 • WATER VALVE THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CURVE RIGHT( THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'29' 35"EAST DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT. -O1•HP- OVERHEAD POWER 1.83 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 1.63 FEET'; THENCE SOUTH 02'09'DO' EAST 18.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.03 ACRES MORE OR O I LESS. 3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT, ' NA EDGE OF PAVEMENT S �� > r g 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON 000T u+ N 3 - PROPOSED EASEMENT BEARINGS BASED ON SURVEY NUMBER 27640. _ S, ,� 3 BENCHMARK NO. Y872 1976,ELEVATION 198.84 FEET. - W A c3 N.G.V.D. 29. 01 1..: ce . P1JIil • CV ip / ' ' D Z EXISTING. / / //�2 s `S a, DR VEWAY to- / \ S.O FBI 4e. ze . \ 41•t„ _ / 2; \ O / / ` N 11\W 100 YEAR ELEVATION \ K PER FEMA PANEL NO. 410276-005 DATED g• 3-1-62 O ,\ u i EN • ,\ /3j EA^,£MENT �� n EXISTING&4 '1 Ih . 6' DRIVEIYC \ AREA y i I 1 0 1 1 \ \ u 161. ..-may CJ.IOIN LING FENCE {•-E' [>SEE VA?FCR DETAIL - T 0. b 1 1 Q4 VVV ..�_T` r-- •-• --•_•-•- - t 1 -- -- x=• -- •_x x 9- ,, r / 1 m >< SLIDING GATE / // 1 I 1 4• :0 1% I SEE VA2 FOR DETAIL x I 3 dJ FJ< I` i (1 ) I I 61 CREEK SFTBgCk / j i" - _ _ I • II ♦ o EASEMENT I- •N AREA • h5 I.N.II Igo ( / _ 1 8 1N CuE410 \ j I - f �- 0 `\ SEE 9/A21\\\ y.m• IIIt i, EXISTING TREE ` / ____.__._ 6 O I I. \ 6iA]FOR\Y / FUTURE HUD I i R4IECMG i TO 6E RETAINED y,•S. I / C _-_ -,.. I ■ \ DETAIL?\ INOT M CONTRACTA e 7 7 x _-_ J- F i i • 3'MIN GRAKL 1Y ` ' \\ (\— \ \ OvER WEED FApRIC --6666 I' V , 5EE NOTE 4/!2 I. j y rrww •' . / I VI x. �� i L TOP OF BANK ( .+a-• a �a_-_x_-x-.�--x_.—:'" -x ._R=.X—x—.—x_x—x—, —x—x • Mr .6 � 'n15 w jv j" O• A o ° L ill o g ! l BALL ExISTING TREES CREEK '({ oTO BE RETAINED 1 l'H i E ti Ce c p ilr F•RC..• ':PcC.CIOR. s 111.6.19 X7,,, i I EASEMENT•ILAN rSITE-PLAN NOTES: Al NOTES. I. LAYOUT 15 DETAILED AT I.CLEAR VEGETATION WTNM EASEMENT AREA. // �\' EA NOT TARE .VEGETATION OUTSIDE f/ V EASEMENT PLAN E AREA. SITE PLAN DRAWING N0.2/AI EASEMENT 1/4'-I'-0' 3.SET FENCE A.INSIDE EASEMENT U NO. I SCALE:VI.'.I'-0' N B.SEE El FOR TRIENC.44ING REQUIREMENTS. CF 5•-EE-S • pis■"� 5 °g u> 10'-0'TYPICAL PANEL 12'-0'CLEAR GATE OPENING , 6'-0'_7 ills iyC� l! T I2'�0' ` g� S SLIDING GATE PER MFR SPECPICATIONB '{vQ.°y •Yb FINISH GRAVEL,4'10 6'OF 5/8kl/4• TOP RAIL I ig!l�11 8C1a� C1 ; CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK W/NO FINES I . ; „ ,-._.r• ' n=/�i 4'MIN THICKNESS I .5:::::::::::::::: 0 2f9S_ _LOP£ 2S& / -r-' EXIST GRADE EXIST GRADE r♦ ih ♦J•♦r♦•0•0•♦r♦i♦O�♦0♦� �� O�♦•v::I J♦i♦♦Oi�♦♦♦D•00 • ♦J♦♦♦♦♦P•♦S OJ♦: • i;Oi♦�i0 7 a♦•♦OJ♦ i i0•♦♦♦r♦rrOr• •. - \ I I . /0////•/��/ �\! •i i i i♦i:i.i �' . C iI ' / °� �-vn=n=uti-_=-_m=1=-=rlt1'' �n n-u-\/\ I O k� iiii0 . s:, 0JJJ +... I iii • R �00 iJ ._, � /�/ \//\ ~ ..� %y�\/,',<-\� ti •.♦•.♦i♦.I►♦.�..❖• ♦0•♦♦ ••♦♦ i♦.♦. i i :4, r.:44.♦•••♦•44.;:OOi...,.. ...A♦:0.:.3.:.„:.:..:40..:.,:..„...x.:.::44,,i•♦♦, .:44.:40.♦ ce � .4,l� i�j \-/�i ® ''::❖•i•OirPti� ♦•♦.i❖♦ i•'+'i'i.•i i° :. �0•0�%i• .0•••0 :***:.;1;0::,t•J♦•�°J• OO• .! J.°. ❖ J.i� ♦•♦J•i�♦i♦ EXCAVATE MIN NECESSARY TO �%•: ii•.i i� i� ..♦ • i.ii•••i••i: "■s y(' y type I s TO SERVICE N ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT I UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND In"' _ ;:;:;CONN U VAU T U VAULT 2/22 2/A2 BARE I R WIRE PER POLE E(TYP) I I I '°(,•' ti m 110 25'OF COILED I *l�l :S CONDUCTORS V 10'x3/4'ROD(TYP) BY CONTRACTOR ,I STAINLESS STEEL N M SEAL G:' FROM RAIN �1 1` l I UTILITY TRENCH 36'MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH ALONG EASEMENT F(SEE 3/A2 FOR DETAIL) N ! F' T cn HUB 91 I BUSOUND� O 0 � 0i ( I I u y z 1 MEI�� I z FUTURE CUE. I o 1 ---t- 0 z j GROUND LEVEL .9.> T. x a I 1 „ 14=1.1-. TO TO we 9 I I -1=' Q one � 1 4 4 Sc NOTES NOTES i I I g a W LOCATE RODS NEAR BLDG CORNERS, MIN 3'FROM LOCAL POWER COMPANY TO PROVIDE FNAL TERMINATION ( I I i m Q BLDG STRICTURE OF CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR TERMINATIONS AT XRMR I I 1- OGROUNDING PLAN ,CONDUIT AT POWER POLE I NTS C;;NTS ' -- I I 8 I i la II NUB I 15 1 m AC CONCRETE ( 1 i CONCRETE UNIVERSAL a ACCESS PORT W/LID BARE CONDUCTOR ENCLOSURE(CUE.) V1 c,4 G' MANUAL I r Tr GROUND LEVE w L/ `II TRANSFER I—J —EL I n n w r. Dui— e u 11- SEE GROUNDING I I!.- SWITCH 0 . I + r- VI c A I I PLAN(5/EI) I �- n 1 Cfl 3 2 rt IL1 / II 1 11 \ 1 d it I Ii _11...-11.1 roPVC-(3)"3/0 , �} m m w nW Q 11 I I a i i"I — — --- - v 7p 1 1 <,- !I R METER METER SOCKET I - —- —_ H"'I 1—ji ,� 11 1E=9:I Iri 1.11 ql G:]- L I 2'OC-(3) 3/0 Q ""TI_I " 1;!"`"ea U, �" SERVICE DISCONNECT OFGI �ELECTR ICAL PLAN ' I. . I .4 II SOALE.3/5•.I.-0' 9 / *2 AWG BARE T _ ---�- ELECTRICAL 611"18OLS ELECTRICAL FLAG NOTES COPPER WIRE 2'1C-(3)'3/0 FLAG NOTE BORE BENEATH THE ROAD FOR POWER CONDUIT. COORDINATE WITH LOCAL K r MTS GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES FOR PROPER DEPTH.EXISTING POWER POLE I IU 1 240/12®V,10 ` 171 PANEL BOARD IS 2E0 FROM SITE. E r 5 240/120V,IS SE RATED �� oR m' FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH PROVIDE 10 FEET OF CONDUIT UP THE POWER POLE. PROVIDE 25 FEET OF COILED S 3W,2004 FCI ® CONDUCTOR PROVIDE TEMPORARY RAIN SEAL AT TOP CONDUIT. COORDINATE OFCI LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR XFMR TERMINATION. W t 10'ROD OR TRANSFORMER,INSULATING KW METER TEST GROUND FROM INTERIOR BUS. MUST BE LESS THAN 5 OHMS TO EARTH. OM ©� CONTACT ENGINEER FOR PROPER GROUND TEST PROCEDURE. IF TEST RESULTS ar ; % PANEL A SPECIAL PURPOSE SHOW IMPEDANCE GREATER THAN 5 OHMS,NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR ASSISTANCE IN T 5 C RECEPTACLES LOCATING GROUND RODS. 31 „wail. g III ,7+ , ■ 240/120V,10,3W SE RATED O MANHOLE ,�p�_• S CFCI �: — OR --1 1— BREAK FOR CLARITY ee<s� oov NOTE. OR DISTANCE TEST WELL REQUIRED. EXPOSED RACEWAY $ FIELD VERIFY LOCATION GROUNDING \ ---___ RA UNDERGROUND LUA E 1 e RACEWAY T. GROUNDING ROD DETAIL GONE LINE DIAGRAM ----- -) CONDUIT TURNING UP a li NT5 NT$ —-—-—~- OR EXITING NG G ENTERING T CF SHEETSI 9-28-2008 2:28PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 1 Fraley/Stricker 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, Wa 98122 Fax1 206-322-2875 Architects 206-324-4800 Fax2 206-328-9499 ] t. Date: 9(�a�ti 00 Time: 92. '52 PM �µ- Total pages faxe�jd: �1 11n(,i►.d,�iu�cpy�{ To „13, .gm x Fax.0c)c) 4O$ 1 T� I 1 C +1..o of T.. �r 1 .r,._....- __ 518- 14eD0• From: j Ana {N4�t . Project: T9r41 l:Ta............. ....._._ _...__ _ F/SA Job#: 191 44 51 Regarding: YfJ1f.'s ..Ca ` _ ........._._._.._ . Attached: >ituniAl (DP)retnijeft,1. Copies to: If total number of pages are not received or are illegible, please call 206-324-4800. 4freil i 40 f1kfL -c-flfs" GIA'n i dba� • cik MCV`kind} Ato- -.'3' )-(‘``I'll‘ +�. 1 AiAai‘5 to co !kw- fin, 5‘1\C . i as;i44.5-3. 1-2a/J%is N 49(nji 0'4/ - \-(>‘' ig_c•CrqaD: - Ca` elk9- ' .' sLav-IA lemAa- 9-28-2000 2:29PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 2 ,.x»r Of'. n-Zb- ' 12:b3 :1 i 1 UNEti(rN S1 ATt Otl' 21)6 32" ' ;# 2/ 7 d Page 1 Of 6 AFTER RECORDING RETURN DOCUMENT TO: Robert TIaRon TQ Northwest,Inc. 22025 301h Ave.SE Bothell,WA 980214444 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THUS EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of franU. 1999,by and between BHK Properties,an Oregon limited liability corporation."Grantor" and TCI Cablevision of Oregon,inc.,an Oregon corporation("Grantoo"). THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Grant or Eiseman. For valuable consideration.the receipt and atrfficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,Grantor hereby grants,conveys and warrants to Grantee,its successors and assigns,a perpetual,irrevocable,unrestricted easement in gross to that portion of Grantor's Property(as defined in Section 2 infra)more particularly described in kAhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the"Easement Area"), for installation, maintenance, operation, repair, and removal of broadband communication system components,or other similar facilities,whether situated aerially,above-ground or underground,including,without limitation,lines,cables,arnphfiers and other electronic equipment,together with any and all buildings, structures,landscaping,fencing, gates,and driveways deemed necessary by Grantee to house,secure,screen or obtain access to such components, facilities,and equipment(all of the foregoing being collectively referred to herein as the"Facilities"). Grantor hereby agrees that the Facilines shall remain the property of Grantee at all times,removable at Grantee's option. The casement shall include the right to enter upon and to have access over and across the Property for installation,maintenance,operation,repair,and removal of the Facilities on or from the Easement Area,during normal working hours,and the benefit of any easements,appurtenances,rights or privileges now or hereafter belonging to the Property. Without limiting the scope of Grantee's rights hereunder,Grantee shall be entitled to access the Easement Area from the driveway area displayed on T'xhibit A. Grantee's right to enter and have access across the Properly shall extend to any time,day or night,where Grantee determines that the installation,maintenance,operation,repair,or removal of the Facilities cannot wart until eormel working hours. 2. Property, Grantor's property (the "Property") is situated in the,County of Washington, State of Oregon,with a street address of 14645 SW 74°'Avenue,Tigard,Oregon 97224 and a legal desorption shown in Enktnit B attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. 3. Auth.orlty Indemnification.Grantor represents and warrants that Grantor has fee title W the Property and that Grantee shall have quiet possession of the Easement Area and peaceable enjoyment of the easement and related rights granted hereunder, subject to the other terms and conditions hereof. Further, Grantor represents and warrants to Grantee that Granter has the sole and absolute right and authority to grant the easement and ell related rights contemplated hereunder, without the consent,participation or joinder of any other person or entity,including,without limitation, the grantee or holder of any deed of trust,mortgage,easement,or other encumbrance against,or right effecting,title to the Property,and agrees to indemnify,defend and bold harmless Grantee,its affiliates and parents from and against all liabilities,claims,actions,suite,costs and expenses,including without limitation,reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or relating to Grantee's exercise of its rights and interests hereunder. 4. ji;enalr. Grantee shall repair to the reasonable satisfaction of Grantor any structure, fence, paving,landscaping or other part of the Prupcaty outside of the Easement Area which that is altered or damaged during the installation,maintenance,repair or removal of the Facilities, 5. nakgaineent, Grantee may assign this Agreement or any of its rights or interests hereunder to any entity or individual. No additional consent to such assignment it required from Grantor other than the execution of this Agreement. 6. Isrm This Agreement and all rights granted herein shall remain in full force and effect in perpetuity. Non-use or a limited use of this easement shall not prevent Grantee from late making flail use of the easement. This Agreement may be terminated and abandoned by Grantee upon the giving of 60 days'prior written notice to Grantor and removal of the Facilities from the Easement Area. Upon such termination and removal,Grantee shall record such documents at its expense as are necessary to abandon the easement 9-28-2000 2:30PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 3 Jun ui J-LU- " 14.04 ,tl,l VlWAiU' JiAIC lire' ZUn JZ% ",s J/ / . • • Page 2 of ti 7. }Your►-Interference, Grantor,for themselves,their heirs,successors and assigns, covenants that the Property shall not be used in any manner which might interfere with or damage the Facilities,or which might interfere with Grantee's free access to,and installation,maintenance, operation,repair,or removal of the Facilities. 8. plttdlnr:Joint and Several I.tability. The provisions of and covenants contained is this Agreement shall touch and concern and run with the land,and shall bind and more to the benefit of the respective successors-in-interest of the parties hereto. In the event drat more than one-person or other entity is included in the collective term"Grantor"hereunder,then each such person or entity shall be jointly and severally liable for all obligations,representations and warranties of Grantor under this Agreement. 9. Becordrtsloe. Grantee may record this Agreement in the real property records of the county where the Property is located, If the Easement Area description contained in this Agreement is general in scope and Grantee's use thereof is later better defined upon subsequent survey,Grantee,at its election, may thereafter record a document describing the Easement Area in greater particularity. By executing this Agreement, Grantor consents to Grantee's recordation of this Agreement and any such subsequent document without any further action or involvement by Grantor. 10. Earther Documents. Grantor will execute any and all further documents, which Grantee reasonably requests to assure to Grantee the nghts granted in this Agreement. I 1. Hagardeus Materials. Grantor represents end warrants to Grantee that,to the best of Grantor's knowkdge,no hazardous material(as defined below)have been or are being released,used, generated, or disposed of anywhere in, upon, or from, the Property. Grantor will not permit the Property to be used or operated in a manner that may allow it to become contaminated with hazardous materials in violation of law. Grantor will indemnify,defend and hold harmless Grantee against and from all liability,damages, claims, enforcement actions, costs and expanses, including cleanup and rsmedlation costs, consultants' costs and reasonable attorneys fees, relating to (i) the suspected, alleged, or actual presence or release of hazardous materials at, to,or from the Property at any time (except to the extent caused by Grantee),or(ii)Grantor's breach of its obligations under this Section (which obligations shalt survive termination of this Agreement). As used herein,"hazardous materials means any substances,compounds or materials now or hereafter defined or regulated as hazardous or dangerous substance or wastes,toxic substances,pollutants,or contaminants,under any federal,state, or local law,regulation,or ordinance governing substances that could cause barn to human health or the environment, and specifically includes, without limitation, petroleum, petroleum byproducts, gasoline and its components,sol vents,radioactive materials,explosives,end asbestos. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. a David Benso7"."7. -. t GRANTEE: TCI Cablevision of Oregon,Inc., an Oregon corporation • • William Tierney,Area Dirictor 9-28-2000 2:31PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 4 oL.n uW• a°LO' " 1L•04 •ILI I/RLWN ]TAIL Ott-4 ZUti ;.j2' ''1;4 4/ '/ Page 3 of 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF OREGON ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day personally appeared before mc David Benson,to mc known to be the President of MK Properties,an Oregon limited liability corporation, the company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said company. Dated IQ ovsM-1Dag CT;1999, • OFD SEN. Notary Public in end for the State of Oregon jp N a Printed Nettie tlLigTwa: v-Apie TWA/ COM USION NO.MIN Residing at ap.{.►ee 1 Oje.e(rfary tu�k5S M. t2�t My appointment expires r tketc,tt t1 2or I STATE OF OREGON ) ss. COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) On this day personally appeared before me William Tierney, to me known to be the Area Director of TCl Cablevision of Oregon, Inc.,an Oregon corporation, the company that executed the within and foregoing instrument,and nckmowlcdged the instrument to be the free and volwitary act and deed of said company for the user and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said company. AI)aso Dated: Feb. 02. .-t999: nn - ( -E— -V _ __ _ _ • Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon • - oteiciou.sgAL NOTARY t AMANDA K DAM 1 Printed Name And i 4( k. �V15 . l t)aW N 926954 (, Residing st 1&415mst. OR MY COMMISSION S SEPT.1R. 0 4 My appointment expires t9,2eorS 9-28-2000 2:32PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 5 +u+i 01 0-4t)- 12.00 ALI UKtbUN SlAlt Ut1 2116 dl" '9;tt 5/ 7 • Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT"A" Attached to and Forming a Part of the Easement Agreement between BILK Properties,as Grantor,and TCI Cablevision of Oregon,Inc.,as Grantee Legal Deserlpdolt for the Easaacat,/,r'q A parcel of land situated in the Northeast quarter of Section 12,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian,Washington County,Oregon being a portion of that tract descnbod as Parcel Three of Document No.97003555 deed records of said county,said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Parcel Throe said corner also being on the Westerly right-of- wey of S.W.74°i Avenue;thence South 89'57'11"West along the South lure of said Parcel Three a distance of 60.00 feet;thence North 00°02'49`West 20.00 feet-,thence North 89°57'11"East 59.26 feet to said right-of-way;thence southeasterly along a non tangent,136.40 foot radius curve right(the long chord of which bears South 02°29'35"East 1.63 feet)a distance of 1 63 feet;thence South 02°09' 00"East 18,38 fact to the point of beginning. Containing 0.03 acres more or less. Bearings based on county survey number 27,640. 9-28-2000 2:32PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P. 6 414!6! WI_ y-Gb- . 1X;bb ;ILl UKtli(N Malt: Utf-4 2Utl t2' '1;e b/ '/ Page 5 of 6 • EXHIBIT"A" Matched to and Forming a Part of the Easement Agreement between BHK Ptaporties,as Grantor,and TO Cablevision of Oregon,inc.,as Grantee Exhibit Map for tie Easesaat Area • N M'32'JO' w �PLASM co .-4q'41411 400 19.00 • r/TOL4r,ruseC CAI Nh' .•W 43111 .347.4 13 SIX=5 u7M CAP - f/+e1wr r"0"wu Co W ,r� r N1Y�o� \ O TAY LOT am T5Y LOT Opp _ PAAC.EL 3 r mutt O e1 O r St nag n•c\ 00"ohCx. 5,5 mot s i. ae[w r/rkuor rum err U�IOm CllIU 0 �_� —IUO IM.i0 _W-�• f a0 N 69'ST I1' E 442.74 / to M 1 a wa5c•• •/'�o'r MASTIC CAI sr bl[NN ^1 ' .1.440 1001 wc.• 4'MOW 41744 P4[ 4'owner , i MEET W O 1!14640 W441 I 55.76.\l•• l TAY LOT 900 �O.Or CI A-37'tr or 70 4.134.40 !,.41 L..7te4 •LC a M 1 H 1...., 4'i0'or 17.51 y.. r$ s co e-70 44 211. I�j •.144.70 1i LC•L 5•Wt b W 11,16 1 4 r1,I4.10 ,u i MI 9-28-2000 2:32PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 P, 7 iJ Lu- 14•c1 .iii IAW5Mr stifle vrr too C2/ '.a ii i Page 6 of 6 EXAMIT"B" Attached to and Forming a Part of the Easement Agreement between BRIO Properties,as Grantor,and TCI Cablevision of Oregon,Inc„as Grantee J,ettal Description for the Preperly A tract of land in Section 12,Township 2 South,Range 1 West,of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 20,Fenno Creek Acre Tracts and running thence East along the North line of the Northeast corner of said Lot 20 to a point on the Westerly lino of the Oregon Electric Railroad;thence Northerly along said railroad 362.5 feet;thence South 89'52'West a distance of 50 feet;thence South along the East line of County Road a distance of 15.3 feet thence South 82° 52'West 40.1 feet to a point on the West line of County Road No. 1042.which point is North 0°03' East 345.95 fat and North 89°52'East 3872 fat from the Northwest corner of Lot 20,Fenno Creek Acre Tracts;thence South 89°52'West 387.2 feet;thence South 0°03'West a distance of 345.95 feet to the place of beginning. Excepting the South 179 feet thereof conveyed to B.E.Torpan,Et Ux,by deed recorded March 5,1946 in Book 255,Page 781. Further excepting therefrom the Easterly 5 feet dedicated for road purposes by document recorded January 15, 1990 as Fcc No.90-02165. Also excepting from the above parcels 1,11 and in that portion dedicated to the public for greenwey purposes by document recorded January 15,1990 as Fee No.90-02164,more particularly described as follows: The following described tract of land,being a portion of that tract of land in deed to Puget Die Casting Co.as recorded in Deed Book 759,Page 22,and situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South,Range 1 West,of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon: Beginning at a point on the South right-of-way line of SW Bonita Road,(County Road No,736)as established in C.S.20387,said point located from a brass cap marling the North one-quarter corner of Section 12,and being South 00°08'27"West 1349.18 feet along the North-South center of section division lint to the point of beginning on the South line of S.W.Beata Road,(30 feet at right angles to the center line thereof);thence North 89° 17'05"East 56.34 feet along said rigrtt-of way line to the Fenno Creek 100 year flood plain line at an elevation of 135.00 feet above aca level;thence following said flood plain line South 04' 19' 11"West 5.74 feet;thence South 34°23'02"West 25.93 feet; thence South 26°12'34"West 27.80 feet thence South 15.52'22"West 32.07 feet;thence South 07° 18' 16"West 26.38 feet;thence South 02°15'55"East 47.41 feet;thence South 00°16'23"East 42.90 feet;thence South 07°50'41"West 16.70 feet;thence South 54°29'01"West 8.00 feet thence South 18°27'20"West 11.90 feet;thence South 04°30'32"East 18,97 feet thence South 04°45' 17"West 23.43 feet;thence South 44° 12' 19"East 18.43 feet,thence South 34' 13'23"East 17.79 felt;thence South 60°27'02"East 10.82 feet;thence South 76°24' 17"Past 11.06 feet;thence South 79°S0'40" East 23.12 feet thence South 84°18'52"East 68.27 feet;thence South 87°06'37"East 30.05 feet; thence 64°41'39"Bast 20.86 feet;thence South 16°49'29"East 26.87 feet;thence South 11'52'05" East 26.55 feet;thence South 38°52'37"East 34.43 feet thence South 10°25'26"East 21.15 feet; thence South 27°20'33"East 25.68 feet to a point on a line 167.80 feet South of and parallel with the South line as described in Deed Book 759,page 22;thence along said hoe South 89°46'45"West 240.50 feet to the North-South center of section division line through Section 12;thence North 00°08' 27"East 455.49 feet to the point of beginning. Bearings hued on county survey number 27,640. • HUNTAIR ' March 29, 2000 City of Tigard, Oregon Attn: Karen Perl Fox 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Property located at. 14645 SW 74th, Tigard, Oregon Dear Ms. Fox, We hereby authorize Mr. David DeVoist, agent for AT&T Broadband, to act in our behalf in the submission of all zoning and building permit documents that are deemed necessary for the above indicated property. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503-403-4422. Thank you for your time in this matter. Ilk Sin• +: Dave Benson Ma ,ordstrom HUNTAIR • 14280 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard,OR 97224 • Phone(503-639-0113 • Fax(503)639-1269 6HUNTAIRe P`'," r" i:L' ' 'v L. . ir! Title Order No. 806407 fs t u e c-, Escrow No. 96160563 • ;771 rf) ■• 'I•• 'I'• After recording return to: BHK Properties., LLC, an Oregon limited liability r l / ' company --- Oil d''.5) Tigard,OR.97224 t Until a ch.nge is requested all tai statements shall be sent to the following address. tras+i oiOw cotj tr BHK Properties., LLC, an Oregon limited liability \ R£4: PreoPfRrr TRArSX£R rAx company s2OG,00 /•f.•'5' 14820 SW 72nd Avenue FEE PAM DATE Tigard,OR 97224 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED PUGET CORPORATION, a Washington corporation. which acquired title as PUGET DIE CASTING COMPANY,a Washington corporation,PUGET CORORATION OF WASHLNGTON AND PUGET I CORPORATION OF OREGON, Grantor. conveys and warrants to BHK PROPERTIES L.L.C., an I Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real property free of liens and S encumbrances: except as specifically set forth herein: ,;, PARCEL L °c L(n i",_ Beginning 20 chains South uT the North line of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range I West, of the --- o S Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon,and 39.95 chains �__ g� West of the East line of said section; thence Southerly and parallel with the East line of said section 212.70 feet;thence Easterly and parallel with the North line of said section,424.50 feet to a point 75 feet ti 3 aS o"�l- '-‘,-^2.,-- AIM■nr Company right of way; thence Northerly and parallel :: I a with said right of way 215.40 feet,thence Westerly and parallel with the North line of said section 392.88 feet to the place of beginning. `_ .' 1 EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof conveyed to Washington County by deed recorded October 28. 1970 in Book 796,pages 657 and 655. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof dedicated to the public for street purposes described in instrument recorded April 5, 1935 as Recorder's Fee No. 85012456 and in instrument =_ l recorded January 15, 1990 as Recorder's Fee No.90 02163;and ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion thereof dedicated to the public for greenway purposes recorded January 15, 1990 as Recorder s Fee No.90 02164. —_ PARCEL II: -\6, A tract of land in\Slction 12, Township 2 South. Range 1 West. of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon,more particularly described as follows: 7 Beginning at a point North 0°03' East 345.95 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 20, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS;thence North 0°03'East 99.95 feet;thence North 89°52' East along the South line of that tract conveyed to Josephine Taylor by Deed recorded in Book 355,page 553,Deed Records, _ a distance of 381.4 feet to the West line of County Road No. 1042;thence South along said road 100.2 feet to a point that is North 89°52' East 387.2 feet from the beginning point of this description;thence P_...,.on°[7',1),..-.70'71 C.to the nnint of hrvinnirz. l- . EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Easterly 5 feet dedicated for road purposes by document recorded January 15, 1990 as Fee No.90-02165. iPARCEL ITT; ''' )g i A tract of land in Section 12, Township 2 South, Range I West,of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,County of Washington and State of Oregon,more particularly described as follows: ' 2- i r 1 • I Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 20, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS and cunning thence East along the North line of the Northeast corner of said Lot 20 to a point on the Westerly line of the Oregon Electric Railroad;thence Northerly along said railroad 362.5 feet; thence South 89°52' West a distance of 50 feet;thence South along the East line of County Road a distance of 15.3 feet;thence South 89°52'West 40.1 feet to a point on the West line of County Road No. 1042,which point is North 0°03' • ns+ 145 9 f• t and North 89°52' East 387.2 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 20, FANNO n CREEK ACRE TRACTS;thence South 89°52'West 387.2 feet;thence bourn 0°03'West a distance of 345.95 feet to the place of beginning. EXCEPTNNG the South 179 feet thereof conveyed to B. E. Torpan, et ut, by Deed recorded.March 5, 1946 in Book 255,page 781. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Easterly 5 feet dedicated for road purposes by document recorded January 15, 1990 as Fee No.90-02165. ALSO EXCEPTING FROM the above Parcels I, II and III that portion dedicated to the public for greenway purposes by document recorded January 15, 1990 as Fee No. 90-02164, more particularly described as follows: I The following described tract of land,being a portion of that tract of land in Deed to Puget Die Casting Co. as recorded in Deed Book 759, page 22, and situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range I West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon: Beginning at a point on the South right of way line of S.W. Bonita Road, (County Road No. 736) as established in C.S. 20387, said point located from a brass cap marking the North one-quarter corner of Section 12, and being South 00°0827" West 1349.18 feet along the North-South center of section _ division line to the point of beginning on the South line of S.W. Bonita Road.(30 feet at right angles to the center line thereof);thence North 89°17'05"East 56.34 feet along said right of way line to the Fanno r"r..t- inn!'e r flnnd plain line at an elevation of 135.00 feet above seal level;thence following said flood • ' plain line South 04°19'11" West 5.74 feet; thence South 34°23'02" West 25.93 feet; thence South 26°12'34"West 27.80 feet;thence South 15°5272"West 32.07 feet;thence South 07°18'16"West 26.38 feet; thence South 02°15'55" East 47.41 feet; thence South 00°16'23" East 42.90 feet; thence South 07°50'41"West 16.70 feet;thence South 54°29'01"West 8.00 feet;thence South 18°27'20"West 11.90 feet; thence South 04°30'32" East 13.97 feet; thence South 04°45'17" West 23.43 feet; thence South t$g 44°12'19"East 18.43 feet; thence South 34°1373"East 17.79 feet; thence South 60°27'02" East 10.82 1 feet; thence South 76°24'17" East 11.06 feet; thence South 79°50'40" East 23.12 feet; thence South Q Iii, 84°18'52" East 68.27 feet; thence South 87°06'37"East 30.05 feet;thence South 64°41'39" East 20.86 _-y feet; thence South 16°4979" East 26.87 feet; thence South 11°52'05" East 26.55 feet; thence South = 38°52'37" East 34.43 feet; thence South 10°25'26" East 21.15 feet;thence South 27°20'33" East 25.68 ,.•-i feet to a point on a line 167.80 Feet So f and parallel with the South line as described in Deed Book - .1 759. page 22; thence along said tin South 89°46`45" c2Li0_50,feet to the North-South center of 1 ---.'> section division line through Section 12; thence North 00°0877" East 455.49 feet to the point of i .�,,;w;arr Is beginning. -- - ti This property is fret of liens and encumbrances,EXCEPT: i 1. Taxes for the year 1996-97: Tax Amount : 512,653.97 Unpaid Balance : S 8,435.98,plus interest,if any. Code No. : 023,74 Account No. : 2S l 12AC-00600 I Key No. : 511075 (Affects Parcel I) • Taxes for the year 1996-97: - Tax Amount : 56,843.00 Unpaid Balance : S4,562.00,plus interest,if any. Code No. : 023.74 Account No. : 2S 112AC-00700 t _ Key No. : 511093 • 3 • _ ' = METRO CAN PROPERTY I OFILE = Washington (OR) **************************************************************************************** * * * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * * * Reference Parcel #:2S112AC 00800 * * Parcel Number :R0511100 RTSQ:01W -02S -12 -NE * * Owner :Bhk Properties Llc * * Conwner , * Site Address :14645 SW 74Th Ave Tigard 97224 * Mail Address :14280 SW 72Nd Ave Tigard Or 97224 * * Telephone :Owner: Tenant: * * * * -- -- == * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * * * * Transferred :01/13/1997 Loan Amount :$1,537, 500 * * Document # :3555 Multi-Parcel Lender :Key Bank Of Oregon * * Sale Price :$2,050,000 Loan Type :Blanket * * Deed Type :Warranty Interest Rate :Fixed * * % Owned :100 Vesting Type :Corporation * * * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * * * * MktLand :$115,210 Exempt Amount * * MktStructure:$28,540 Exempt Type * * MktOther % Improved :20 * * MktTotal :$143,750 Levy Code :02374 * _ ' J8-99 Taxes ,Jl, G93.0G School D13 t * * Assessed Tot:$113,340 * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * * * Map Grid :655 G6 Class Code :I2 * * Census :Tract:308.02 Block :3 * * NbrhdCd :YI5 MillRate * * Sub/Plat * * Land Use :3012 Ind,Improved * * Legal :ACRES .96 * * *• * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * * Bedrooms Lot Acres : .96 Year Built * * Bathrooms Lot SqFt :41, 818 EffYearBlt * * Heat Method : BsmFin SF Floor Cover : * * Pool BsmUnfinSF Foundation * A iiaiii:CS US1uL60■ r. . r r `.h_ _ *_ _ * Dishwasher Bldg SqFt Roof Matl * Hood Fan lstFlrSqFt InteriorMat : * * Deck UpperFlSF Paving Matl : * * Garage Type : Porch SqFt Const Type * * Garage SF Attic SqFt Ext Finish * * Deck SqFt * **************************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • ' Transfer History Property ID: RO '100 Buyer : Bhk Properties L L C Price : $2,050,000 CoOwner Xfered : 01/13/1997 Title : First American Title Doc # : 3555 Lender : Key Bank Of Oregon Deed : Warranty Loan : Blanket Vest : Corporation Loan$ : $1,537,500 %Owned : 100 Rate : Fixed $/SgFt : 0.00 Buyer : Puget Corporation Of Oregon Price . CoOwner Xfered : 04/07/1995 Title : Doc # : 23496 Lender Deed . Loan Vest . Loan$ %Owned : 100 Rate $/SqFt : 0.00 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • SW 1/4 NE I/4 SECTION 12 T2S R I W W.M. 2S I I2AC • WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 40 a SCALE I 100' SEE MAP 2S 112A8 2 I t ago 0o R R - J L . BON ITA ROAD S.W. n $ `,i'szi p (CR. 736-4o.VICE) R --- 90• tat -' r \ »-•4c01 !a-0[19S C»-60aC7 '.it,,, r� s.n #}�d a 300 na.la In.wf 100 'I aro 600 I X1 9N l 2.O8Ac. 200 I 4 ./94C. d 101 - !_� I.67Ac. w? AI o 300-Al 101 MI ilk 33 AC (n loo .D L — — — �. 117n M Iii T41 2 i C y I '� I s&sr 's _ I!2.A• — J L - -w/_ x0!• J Caw CELLED TAX LOTS 36440'60• Z r 1�1 a��.— 1400,2001,102, • 700 w 66•ax'. an \ C 2400 40 xs• °•ro .86 Ac. 4.19 AC. 16.97 $ 400 • 0140 n.4s B. Z .84 AC. , t 1• fl' 16.43 S 6S•SL 91 aA7 '• •: 1 U I ,9* 8 1St Kt a X400-MI°, 4° -- l" 42s.70 '' a 0 �t 3 s6.:7 4 ' P (/r • ° la0s BOO BOIM MST .99 AC. P ow B3 Ac.., .J \1--r-1- s � QfO `1 s4.4s g a( STA.4A 6! `.b GREENWAY \,:v :Li 4' 21. r, ' \ 240.50 - cI z 40 !O 900 2 /.9B AC. ... �' _— k Lao 136.14 "j g 1000 .43 AC. 1 1000-MI • ^ ^ I SEE MAP L -}v( 2S 1 12A EAST 620' 171.21' 1970 nr 600 M/ ... .................... .. >.wro.•nvn�n via.��r..yr..r.�v...�..................�.....A110. 0�.• . . .., 1.0::+13:" . 4>0.x4 4p 141.x1' 106.7 199.02'•• 13111.06 Zee 41'ro" 0 1100 2300 JJ3OAC 1.64.4c. 1 2.15 AC ^'^ $ F. r� ��l .Ni J 20 RI.. ~,�21 N o zoo / ! n 51— Z G- ,\y 4 8 2200 ' ._ ., 466J6' —_ . ►. M .52 AC. n 10 r 1 - - a • �� 23526' _ I U v r 200 • 19 ,tO ' FOR ASSESSMENT• a u: '°,= 2100 (CS.11216) a PURPOSES ONLY q 96 At_ 4mm.00• DO NOT RELY ON xas4• r - FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS ■ A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 TEL 206/324-4800 FAX 206/322-2875 February 17,2000 RE: AT&T Broadband and Internet Services Dear Interested Party: Fraley/Stricker Architects P.S. is an agent representing AT&T Broadband and Internet Service. This will be a design and upgrade of equipment to provide TV cable network. high speed interne and long distance phone service at 14645 SW 7461 Avenue Tigard.OR. We are proposing a site development preview 60' X 20' easement to house necessary equipment for a fiber optic network. The equipment cabinets are 6' X 10' X 6' and there will be a total of two. One is to be installed at the permit issuance and the second to be installed in the future. A site-obscuring fence will enclose the easement area at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits,I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Thursday. March 9.2000 at 6:30 PM to 9:00 PM City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard. OR 97223 Town Hall Room Please notice this will be an informational meeting on Preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at(206)324-4800 if you have any questions. Sincerely. David DeVoist Sr. Project Manager FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1) WHAT IS THE FIBER OPTIC USE? AT&T is upgrading their cable to include Cable TV, High Speed Internet and Long Distance Telephone all in one package. 2) HOW WILL THIS EFFECT MY PROPERTY? None, the existing cable to your property remains the same. 3) HOW DOES THIS PROJECT EFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT? The equipment vault houses electronic gear. No radiation or other hazard materials are related to this equipment. 4) WILL THIS PROJECT EFFECT MY PROPERTY TAX? No. The existing public and private facilities are adequate to serve the existing development and expansion: no additional improvement is required. 5) WILL THIS PROJECT EFFECT TRAFFIC? Other than the two-week installation period, a service truck will visit the site about once a month. His/Her truck has off street parking within the easement area. 6) WHAT IS THE VISUAL IMPACT? The easement are will be enclosed by a site-obscuring fence to match adjacent property fence. _� h',j • .14t ■ 17 r;' •A.. • .. 1./a :.t'.. r .. f' rf�1 11 ,/,..- �Z, �f- •'''‘.:24-. Fes? n �, / -- I'ry.� f F i.' �'` _`; �, ;, .• fTE ►ra ; . - r:,r' r c j • r 144,"f !f i /•,` , } 4r, r, !VINT !•` � '� l I .- + . ' . '� .n ;Ail r (2 4-•.:- .-: .- • ••:, ' - . .. \ tt • n,.t. ;( /• ' . _ T ' _ -J,L-. 1 • ■ `'2• k t H�— 01,- t- ‘,4,--••-,4,.; -,,..1..-......**0 itom, •; ...1::ti-m, . •- -.... - ____--... jh of •f' -'t• -- _ar••. •Kr r '�4dr.^"r — .is . „.., ,., .... .. .4_,..,.... ....... . , . . . , •i..:..:, .. . '1 .' 4"11111... ' ' .T nTAL t•,- .:.,- --. /..7 ,4 .,. .� NOTICE r . Developer to hold - •.--�_ J I. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING -. • `_ concerning proposed -1 •,- V . development of this property. c, ::•, z ti Moetin9 e Time Location ,,,. Dat ._ MARCH 9,2000 630 PM CITY OF T IC�ARD •AA (icw 14Au.) '- r.1 ' • - ` PROPOSED PROJECT: t 1/ INSALU1TIOhl OF A TEL SCUM . a Wig `: 1 ... / C0NLQETE rc-LCLOSURE(6'x1Q•) / For Moro Information Contact: % / Devaloper Name' AT i T BROADRANI•) , MEW Address. 3500 jN 9DND.PpWTLAND 972OI r-- - Telephone: (503)605-4901 -- _ - ' ---........_ -274.--r-'--_ :'•■_..- - .-----3••- - ' fj 'i'rt y 3.� 'V . a; • 1 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SIGN UP SHEET TOWN HALL CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 2000 AT 6:30 PM TO 9:00 PM RE: AT&T BROADBAND AND INTERNET SERVICES PROJECT ADDRESS: 14645 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD, OR NAME ADDRESS PHONE ',01/1/ �' 35(,C) S%c) 6ci lean s r Oin4;. Por tl nd OR Q ( (sv3)C - 4Q A.T'T i3� (0)6(4 fai-77/ /2 66,1.2,c,;4 0-04, _ -2,z-ygo--= ArfIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) David DeVoist , being duly sworn, depose and say that on February 17, 2000 19 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (* ) 14645 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Seattle, WA with postage prepaid thereon. (LJ &L Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEJNOTARIZE) Washinton Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of n I , �L� 03:00 . :* "$.4,,/}A, ctj�,,ivN BL�Zo;'O= N( T• 'Y PU5 IC OF Washington • rF 20.•;��.• My Commissidn xpires: - 0-0 •��h�0:n AS•'�d (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: AT&T Broadband and nterne (TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Equ -n vau or i•er optic E ectronics Fraley/Stricker Architects, P.S. Name of Applicant/Owner Y/ Address or General Location of Subject Property: 14645 SW 74th Avenue Tigard OR Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): Sec I2,Townsf ip 2 South, Range 1 West Tax Lot 800 Parcel 3 h:VoginlpattyVnasterslaffmail.mst • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVITTO: City;of Tigard ri t kczren To$ PiaitningDiwision • 18125 SW Hail Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 I, Glenn Kochi arr>G e,do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed' tt1 IG On c i eCan endefgure, affecting the land located at -(state the approximate location(s) if no address(s)and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 14645 SL) 74t' , r)t, "Rsard, OR Y721- , and did on the 171- , day of teerlfO Yga2OD personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a buj)c lr\1� permit application, and the time, date and place of a neighborh 6d meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at SUa r COriler c at 14(945 S � 74Th Avewe Tr garc k 9702 . Stsn was s1r,d on a v4-iil at/ pale . (state location you posted notice on property) /liz?-4� 4 S 2110/00 i Signature (In presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the to day of , 1 g 0C �". OFFICIAL SEAL ` /, .�=rr JENEAN M. LINDBECK �'LECLvi. —14 05 , 1 2C k � NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON COMMISSIONNO.327236 O ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28,2003 My Commission Expires: A3V ,wSi c.,?DQ3 (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA C•n "•r• II TYPE OF PROPOSED DE L• • NT: -14 _e -v A• .j • • if Name of Applicant/Owner s(•!.•t•'.••Cd Address or General Location of Subject Property: "MU-N /MN:lit: - - •��;� II LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): • • • - - 2:C . •i .&• h:Vop inpsttylmeelemeflpwtmtt eS r7,0#>r of TES pQo f ez,7. -r 620AD I>uD ~rGI seta, (Jn127 L-P.1 1 4 (9q3 S41 "7 Oil i 9',,J ©� �/ LL• E' C oo� ( 6 1 •Li5-ts.L.A_. I 11.(4/ 41-4***1/7 ,c f El in /S/121C r FRALEY/ STRICKERW DOD/ • ARCHITECTS ■ Z/,¢,,_ d4UC �G� 4RAC�� iI0L1�G° d A ZROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORP LON 2 1,1 c O • . 120 LAKESIDE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 (206) 324-4800 DATE z /2 /00 JOB NO. 99,4/6, �^ FAX (206) 322-2875 ATTENTION 7 TO RE: 6/7-Y Op 774 4.p.b FJG t-f 130R4-.1cou (44 E-E--7/4.) / PeA,,i�,1 .6l VI S✓OA—) RECEIV / 3 /2s / Su) gALL AZ iii, -7714 b oil 77 Z� 3 FEB 2 8 2000 CITY OF TIGARD WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: > ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications /Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 00,9/00 / 4f,704 VI T o PaST/LJC uo77�&' ' ' z t9'/-o f7 I 5-1 A...► / � 7 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution 'As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. / AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT T4: :: .. City of Tigard Mtn,. kcfen Ta Planning Division 18125 SW HaIIBoulevard Tigard, OR. 972;23: . 1, Ie� KOSh1 Cio affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a propose 1 i aft GO c c ' Car) e astir- - affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s)and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 14(a45 S 74J-f) nu ,Ts�, OR �t7Z and did on the _ I7+ day of F bIVOIy ki AL.rinr, • 1,54200 personally post notice indicating tfiat the site may be proposed for a rntt application, and the time, date and place of a neighborfi d meeting to discuss the proposal. nn The sign was posted at 50(1- 'h t corner cr' •' al' )-9- 41,5" SO a,.. Ti c ck ' - . Sty i ..si ci an a u (state location you posted notice on property) ' // 4/% / 2115/00 Signature (In presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/a Irmed before me on the ,QA 0 - day of r-deuccK,-/ , 19CC . nn •,fit, OFFICIAL SEAL ,{ �� r,I&�1� r.�;,�1. JENEAN M. LINDBECK 1LECf.{'1 4 `f—i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON O ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION NO.327236 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28, 2003 My Commission Expires: A;D1/ ..wy � 3 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED N E: C•f it"C( �•&4 0 TYPE OF PROPOSED DE L• • .ENT '�R:j• Al • - -• M 'l_ •a- — Name of Applicant:Owner: AT'_ • U!,.t•�% ; • II Address or General Location of Subject Property: � � +l�f*: ' 1 .`►.[it S:�• - LSubject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot#(s): • • . 1 a - - 2.:c •. ■1 OAP h:VopiriN stty'nastervattposunst 2-45-2000 1 :38PM FROM FRALEY STRICKER 12063289499 R. 4 52)4V-- I I RECEIVED PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE FEB 2 3 2000 I 'WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETBRN THIS AFFED IPdt(3AhD City of Tigard Mtn t k .ren ':off Planning Division 1812$ SW Ha1lBoulevarri Tigard, OR 97223 I, Glenn Koshil/CcLY]� o affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed' ail 0;f100 a Q `eIeGOY) e.idoSure- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) I4 5* S _4 ant IlsQ�, OR �7Zc - , and did on the 171' day of F -arvary IQ&personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a bu1)cfii 4 permit application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhbbd meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at .., r ileaSt el 141 OP if at 14 5 S1) A... 4 ` Tr • o' ' .- . St a s, _ gala ari a v ► pal e . • (state location you posted notice on property) 2i1S/00 Signature (In Wre presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of 15-eh uar,i , 19Cc *:/i7'= JENEANIM. LINDBECK &1.ECLYi. { - " l)`�-0 w NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION N0.327236 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV.28,2003 My Commission Expires: i )V► j �?D (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAIAE •1 et/_ *•vI TYPE OF PROPOSED DE 4 L• •' .ENT: .l+ir�!►.:,�riSl� �� =1! !! cl. Oa- Name of ApplicantlOwner: T* • WI.!r :. Address or General Location of Subject Property: i �1f ArIT: t!lriAl•h _ Lsobject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot#(e): • • a , - Z,;C 'z v.id — h:VopinVetty∎raslerMaffpoet.mst - , i_ . 1\ . r.w•rte. .....,......••,.... I i , it y � �s .V"'� +• ',"„ '1� . ,sr .. ail!° ,0.0' -, r • ,*1 ' 1 ` - -+'' i rte' sj •' 1 ..f S. S. 4, G\ NOTICE . Developer to hold • "1 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING a, concerning proposed j/ development of this property. . .. 1 mottling Dtste Tune Location - M A, l i 9,2(f() &"K)Tt1 CITY cf 11(144) i� ►(ftri W IIAIL) er- r PROPOSED PROJECT: • - IN'17ALLATIAN Of A TF1 F.(()M l Lt)NJJl.Ttm E.Ii•LO LJW(6'Kid) For Mora Information Contsth I D.r•loya ham. AT 1 T 13RnADHAtill Ad J»s s' 3500 iN g()WT),TbRT'I AM)$/to' T•/•ph<a-i• (si()3)605 4901 . 4 v• :4� '9v) Oregon Division of State Lands z 775 Summer Street NE \� � Salem,OR 97301-1279 '9� John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor (503)378-3805 FAX(503)378-4844 1-1Y(503)378-4615 July 21, 2000 State Land Board John A.Kitzhaber Glenn Koshiyama Governor AT&T Broadband Bill Bradbury 3500 SW Bond Avenue Secretary of State Portland, OR 97201-4597 Jim Hill State Treasurer Re: Wetland Determination for AT&T Utility Vault Site Located at 14645 SW 74th Ave., Tigard; DSL #WD 00-0323; LWI Site#G3; T 2S R1W S12AC TL 800 Dear Mr. Koshiyama: I have reviewed the wetland determination report prepared by David Evans and Associates for the above site and concur with their conclusion that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek(tax lot 900)does not meet wetland criteria. Therefore,no state removal or fill permit is required for the proposed activity. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Local permit requirements may apply as well. The City of Tigard has separate authority under their land use regulations with respect to adjusting the setback requirements for the area investigated. This concurrence is based upon the information provided in the report. Should additional information be provided or site conditions change, the Division would consider the new information and revise our jurisdictional determination if needed. Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at extension 236 if you have any questions. gASincerely, 111' i tai,N 61"01K- C _Janet C. Morlan, PWS Wetlands Program Leader cc: Ethan Rosenthal, DEA (Project TCIW0006) Karin Fox and Dane Roberts, City of Tigard Planning Department K:\Wetlands\vet-WN Letters\2000\00-0323.doc RECEIVED PLANNING (i )a AUG 01 ma DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. July 31, 2000 CITY OF TIGARD 2828 SW Corbett Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 Karin Fox Planning Department Tel: 503.223.6663 City of Tigard Fax: 503.223.2701 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REFERENCE: AT&T BROADBAND(formerly TCI CABLE)PROPOSED UTILITY VAULT SITE, 14645 SW 74TH AVENUE,TIGARD,OREGON Dear Mrs. Fox: This letter is in reference to AT&T Broadband's (AT&T)(formerly TCI Cable)proposed utility vault site at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard. AT&T has previously sent in a development application for the site. You had expressed some concerns regarding impacts to wetland and water resources at the site and had requested a review by Unified Sewerage Agency(USA) and the Division of State Lands(DSL). Attached is a copy of USA's Service Provider Letter and DSL's Wetland Determination Review Letter concurring with the findings of the Wetland Determination performed by David Evans and Associates(DEA). I am also attaching a copy of the surveyed site map that shows the results of the Wetland Determination as well as the FEMA 100-year flood elevation. The minimum elevation of the proposed site is approximately 137.5 feet. According to the March 1, 1982 FEMA map(FEMA Panel#410276-005),the 100-year flood elevation is 134.0 feet. A new 100-year flood elevation of 137.0 feet was proposed in a study performed for the City of Tigard. It is uncertain if the City has adopted this new flood elevation. Regardless,the proposed project is located higher than both the existing and proposed 100-year flood elevations. On behalf of AT&T, David Evans and Associates, is requesting that a Completeness Review be performed by the City of Tigard for the above project. It is the hope that the attached information should complete AT&T's development application and that City's concerns regarding impacts to wetlands,water resources,and associated buffers have been alleviated. If you have any questions please give me a call at 499-0572. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,INC. Ethan Rosenthal Natural Resource Specialist Na[xo Outstanding Professionals. . . Outstanding Quality GLOBAL d�i"dNALLIANCE 07/31/00 09:59 FAX 503 6403525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Ir.1uui Y" v �-- ^File Number Unified Sewerage Agency ��n fied Sewerage Agency of Washington County Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Tigard Date July 17, 2000 ' Map & Tax Lot Within 2S112AC: 00800 Owner Easement owned by Site Address 14645 SW 74`h Avenue ATT Broadband Tigard, Oregon •Contact ' Fraley Stricker Architects Proposed Activity _ Utility Vault Installation Address 120,Lakeside Ave,'Ste.100 Seattle, WA 98122 Phone (206) 324-4800 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with the Agency Design and Construction Standards (R&O 007). YES NO YES NO Natural Resources .Alternatives Analysis, r - Assessment (NRA)Resources ,,_ , Required I .❑ Submitted (Section 3.02.5) Agency Site Visit ❑ IX Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis Date: Concur with information Fl Li Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis ❑ El submitted information Sensitive Area Present M Agency Concur with l i On-Site Alternatives Analysis Sensitive Area Present ® I Vegetated Corridor Off-Site Mitigation Required Vegetated Corridor Present On Site ❑ M On-Site Mitigation El 4 Width of Vegetated 50 feet wide Off-Site Mitigation El Corridor(feet) Condition of Vegetated Marginal Corridor El Planting Plan Attached Enhancement Required CI Vegetated Corridor Encroachment into [11 Vegetated or Equivalent ❑ V Required El (Section 3.02.4(3)) _____ 4 • Type and Square Footage Agency Concur with RSAT, of Encroachment NA or Equivalent Allowed Use ❑ - Conditions Attached (Section 3.02.4(b)) Thir4 Sc,rvico Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they_a_re subsequently _ discovered on your property. Post-1t`Fax Note 7671 Da1e 1 31 Ipaggeso. To�/►i un! Fro e [r 'Co.DeolCo. �5-At • Phone K Phone M /„�//7_ P1 �1 y Fax 223- z e) / FaxN (e`ZrJ T1Y� ! r 07731/00 09:59 FAX 503 6403525 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY uuc File Number In order to comply with wager quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following condition's: XI No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activit es shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3 (1), (2), or (3). W No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4 (a through h). The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet 'wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. Enhancement of the vegetated corridor shall be required when development or re-development of the remaining portions of the tax lot is proposed. iPrior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.0.4.a and per approved plans. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the application shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the Agency with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. ❑ For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater, the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.6, Table 3.2. For vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.6. Table 3. . El For vegetated corridors that extend 35 feet from the top of a ravine, the width of vegetated corridor may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of the ravine. 0'f/31/00 10:00 FAA 503 6403525 _LAMED SF thKAUE AG1 \LY L UU. File Number Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be conducted either concurrent with or prior to development of the site. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Appendix E: Landscape Requirements (R&O 007: Appendix E). Prior to installation of plant materials, all non-native and invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of non-native and invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. n Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan. n Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the application shall provide the Agency with the required vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation of fencing between the development and the outer limits of the vegetated corridors. n Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 007. nPerformance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1.4. EX Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with USA's Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the Agency or its designee is required pursuant Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. Other: tsv\_�.)(t i • L� air �. .►, rw' _ • U f\k k\t f ‘A/ sik l- p c- c cdo(o n Other: - Other: ' .\ vision of State Lands o, oregon Di !�,:• _ �, 775 Summer Street NE Salem,OR 97301-1279 John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Govemor (503)378-3805 FAX(503)378-4844 TTY(503)378-4615 July 21, 2000 (� E D E uU State Land Board '/110t1 John A.Kitzhaber Glenn Koshiyama Governor AT&T Broadband ( Bill Bradbury 3500 SW Bond Avenue Secretary of State Portland, OR 97201-4597 Jim Hill State Treasurer Re: Wetland Determination for AT&T Utility Vault Site Located at 14645 SW 74th Ave., Tigard; DSL#WD 00-0323; LWI Site# G3; T 2S R1W Si2AC TL 800 Dear Mr. Koshiyama: I have reviewed the wetland determination report prepared by David Evans and Associates for the above site and concur with their conclusion that there are no wetlands on the project site and that the riparian forest between the project site and Ball Creek(tax lot 900) does not meet wetland criteria. Therefore, no state removal or fill permit is required for the proposed activity. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal-Fill Law only. Local permit requirements may apply as well. The City of Tigard has separate authority under their land use regulations with respect to adjusting the setback requirements for the area investigated. This concurrence is based upon the information provided in the report. Should additional information be provided or site conditions change,the Division would consider the new information and revise our jurisdictional determination if needed. Thank you for having the site evaluated. Please phone me at extension 236 if you have any questions. Sincerely, R i Janet C. Morlan, PWS Wetlands Program Leader cc: Ethan Rosenthal, DEA(Project TCIW0006) Karin Fox and Dane Roberts, City of Tigard Planning Department K:\Wetlands\Det-WN Letters\2000\00-0323.doc • • V - NOTES H N 89' 32' 30" W \\,...............- 19.80 1. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS W Z PP 3tt5 COUNTY SURVEY 27,640. 2 OO - � � � 89' 32' 30" W W W .. 25 2. THIS IS NDT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. DEA IS NOT co 367.45 RESPONSI3LE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES a W O cc THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION W W DISCLOSE[) BY A TITLE REPORT. z z H Z 3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT. ��2 Q = O EXISTING 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN ° 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON ODOT t () O FOLLOWS ELEV. 134.0) PROPOSED 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN a w ( (FOLLOWS ELEV. 137.0) I BENCHMARK NO. Y672 1976, ELEVATION 198.84 f" A G FEMA PANEL # 410276-005, FEET, N.G.V.D. 29. s 1- zoo I MARCH 1, 1982 CONCRETE 0 3 a N �p \ SIDEWALK .- ? w N z � TAX LOT 800 0 co 6" MAPL C. ` �� PARCEL 3 6" MAPLE \ 0 A to b - \Z TAX LOT 801 `� �i -. Project Site \ . A N z49, 7 �� 6\ MAPLE 4 `j6. EXTRUDED CUR;. P I, �® 18.38• 240.50 " ` 207_:24 \ '"- .,"4��//�� STORM Ca - - - - �2;SiI/I2r'_' 11\ TOP=99.47 •-j.- .- +�� -•SA 1E OUT=96.47 N 89. 57' 11" E 442. 4 218.41` lO• PEAR -1 �� ° 6 16" CHERRY ■` W / zr FANNO 6" CHERRX 26 AS I w« PGE #7208 L G N t_. ` ' > CREEK ` / 8" CHERRY W/TRANSFORMEF -f�1„_ <. `SO' I ' 1 STREET LIGHT #J�U RSA \ ' ® CATCH BASIN S�Te �k 60 00 57' 11"`W y > 1 DOWN GUY ANCHOR z d o= TAX LOT 900 / < „� C > \ ! t7 FIRE HYDRANT -< o= 1 �! 20' \ o- POWER POLE A< «S I _ I A-__/ '�A"` -'� � I ® WATER VALVE V 4!) Z I PLOT#2 �2� v --OHP OVERHEAD POWER �� • N _it, EDGE OF PAVEMENT �-TOP OF BANK 6 PLOT#1 �; Dv = � oo• zz > TOP OF BANK WETLAND DETERMINATION SUMMARY ' / \ • o - z -- CREEK 1. CITY OF TIGARD LOCAL WETLAND INVENTORY (LWI) IS INACCURATE - 4. C WITHIN VICINITY OF PROPOSED PROJECT. m m -- EXISTING 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN 2. NO JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS FOUND WITHIN PROJECT VICINITY. —• PROPOSED 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN • / I • I� 3. BALL CREEK & FANNO CREEK ARE JURISDICTIONAL "WATERS OF j w — 50' SETBACK 01 THE STATE." I - -- - - - PROPOSED EASEMENT 4. 50 FOOT RIPARIAN SETBACK MEASURED FROM TOP-OF-BANK OF / l< i BALL CREEK & FANNO CREEK. BALL 5. PROPOSED CABLE UTILITY VAULT CLEARLY FALLS OUTSIDE OF THE CREEK 1 E 50 FOOT RIPARIAN SETBACK. Ali - - - - - - - SCALE: 1" = 50' LOT 20 0 25 50 100 ' FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS IMOIM611■111 _ � 9 e • W'eHojick Deter YY1 i'n cd-i o v) January 10,2000 Karin Fox Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REFERENCE: WETLAND DETERMINATION FOR TCI CABLE UTILITY VAULT SITE 14645 SW 74TH AVENUE,TIGARD, OREGON DEA PROJECT NO. TCIW0006 (37) Dear Mrs. Fox: This memorandum summarizes the results of an on-site wetland determination prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA)for the property located at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon (subject property)(Tax map 2S-1-12AC, Tax lot 800). The field investigation took place on August 13, 1999. On behalf of TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc. (TCI), DEA investigated this site to determine whether jurisdictional wetlands occur on-site or within 50 feet of a utility vault proposed to be constructed by TCI on the southeastern corner of the subject property. The property immediately adjacent to the south side of the subject property (adjacent property)(Tax map 2S-1-12AC, Tax lot 900) was also investigated. The City of Tigard's Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) identifies wetlands and an associated 50-foot setback within the area of the proposed TCI utility vault. This mapping reflects the presence of a riparian forest associated with Ball Creek that is located on the southern portion of the adjacent property. The on-site investigation, performed by DEA, revealed that the mapping provided by the LWI is inaccurate within the vicinity of the proposed project and that no jurisdictional wetlands exist within 50-feet of the proposed TCI easement site. Specifically,the investigation determined that the riparian forest did not meet the necessary criteria to be declared a jurisdictional wetland. Ball Creek is considered a jurisdictional "water of the state". Based on these findings, the City of Tigard's required 50-foot riparian setback area should be measured from the top-of-bank of Ball Creek. TCI's proposed easement clearly falls outside of this 50-foot setback(Figure 1). As part of this investigation, the site has been professionally land surveyed and a base map produced (Figure 1). The map shows the spatial relationship between the top of bank of Ball Creek,the City of Tigard's required 50-foot setback,the 100-year flood plain (based on FEMA Panel #410276-005, March 1, 1982), and TCI's proposed easement site. The easement site falls outside both the 50-foot setback and the 100-year flood plain. All below-ground structures fall within the foot print of the proposed easement. METHODS Prior to the on-site investigation, reference materials were reviewed to provide information regarding the possible presence of wetlands, water features, hydric soils, wetland hydrology and site topography. The materials reviewed include: • Beaverton, Oregon, 7.5 minute Quadrangle, U.S. Geological Survey(USGS), 1984. • Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1982. • Beaverton, Oregon,National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1981. The on-site investigation was conducted on August 13, 1999. The project site was walked and two sample plots established to confirm the presence or absence of jurisdictional wetlands using the routine on-site method described in the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(Environmental Laboratory, 1987). This method requires an area to possess a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Under normal circumstances, positive indicators of each of these three parameters must be present for an area to satisfy the criteria for jurisdictional wetlands. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property currently consists of a paved lot with no buildings or similar structures (Figure 2). The southern boundary of the property is bordered by several trees—Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), pear (Pyrus communis), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and cherry (Prunus sp.). This border is approximately three feet wide and runs the length of the southern boundary with the exception of a vegetated area approximately 15 x 15 feet abutting 74`h Avenue. Douglas fir and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) were noted in this vegetated area, in addition to a utility pole and fire hydrant. The proposed easement site is situated in this area. The adjacent lot to the south of the subject property is undeveloped and partially covered with piles of dirt and asphalt. Both properties are bounded by 74th Avenue on the east. A riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is located on the southern portion of the adjacent property and eventually raps around to form the western boundary of the subject property. The forested area comes closest to the proposed easement site directly south of the easement site, with an approximate distance of 75-feet. Ball Creek is a tributary of Fanno Creek and is located in the Tualatin River watershed. The existing incised channel indicates that Ball Creek has been disconnected from its flood plain through this section of its reach. Ball Creek enters the forested area through a five-foot culvert that runs underneath 74th Avenue. The creek is approximately eight feet deep from the bottom of the channel to the top of the bank and is fifteen feet wide from bank to bank. Historically this riparian forest may have been located within the creek's active flood plain. DETERMINATION FINDINGS No jurisdictional wetlands were found within the study area of this investigation. One"Water of the State", Ball Creek, was identified on the southern portion of the adjacent property. Results of the preliminary and on- site investigation are discussed below. The NWI does not indicate wetlands on the subject property; however, a palustrine forested wetland is mapped for the area associated with Ball Creek along the southern portion of the adjacent property (Figure 3). The mapped soil series, within the proposed easement site, is Quatama loam,0 to 3 percent slopes(mapping unit#37A)(Figure 4: Washington County Soil Survey). This moderately well-drained soil is found on old terraces. Quatama loam is not considered a hydric soil within Washington County. Cove clay is mapped within the vicinity of Ball Creek. Cove clay is considered a hydric soil within Washington County. Two sample plots were established during the course of the field investigation. Plot 1 is located approximately 30 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 25 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the adjacent property. The plant community is dominated by bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum, FACU) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU). Red alder(Alnus rubra, FAC) was also found. The soil is a dark brown (10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles or redoximorphic features. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. It is unlikely that the area surrounding plot 1 would be considered an active flood plain (i.e. flooded by 2 year flood event) of Ball Creek. Plot 1 is considered an upland plot due to the lack of a hydrophytic plant community, hydric soils,and wetland hydrology. Plot 2 was located approximately 60 feet west of the edge of 74t Avenue and 15 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the adjacent property. The plant community is dominated by reed canarygrass(Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). Other species found were Watson's willow weed (Epilobium watsonii), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), and Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana, FAC). Several well established Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia, FACW)were found outside of the plot area. The soil in plot 2 is also a dark brown (10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles. Redoximorphic features,although few and very faint, were present. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. Plot 2 is approximately 1 foot lower in elevation relative to plot 1; however, it is still significantly higher than the creek bed and is unlikely to flood during 2 year flood events. Although a hydrophytic plant community exists at this plot, Plot 2 is considered an upland plot due to its lack of hydric soils and wetland hydrology. REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS According to the City of Tigard Community Development Code (Section—18.797.010), Ball Creek is classified as a"Major" stream with an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second. The "riparian setback area" for major streams is 50 feet and is measured from top-of-bank or the edge of an associated wetland. RECOMMENDATIONS As described in the findings section of this report, it was determined that the riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is not a jurisdictional wetland; however, Ball Creek itself is a jurisdictional "water of the state". Therefore, it is recommended that the riparian setback area be established from the top-of-bank along Ball Creek. This will place the outer boundary of the setback area within the unvegetated portion of the adjacent property and more than 50 feet from the proposed location of the TCI utility vault. This boundary is different from the City's Water Resources overlay,which places the boundary within the subject property. If you have any questions regarding the findings of this report,please feel free to call me at(503)499-0572. NOTE: Findings of DEA's investigation will be based on the site information collected at the time of our study; our understanding of the 1987 Corps of Engineers(ACOE) Wetlands Delineation Manual;and our understanding of federal, state, and local regulations governing wetlands. These regulations, delineation methodologies, and wetlands themselves may change over time. A DEA Natural Resources wetland determination memorandum is not to be used as a fully documented wetland delineation report to the environmental regulatory agencies that exert jurisdiction over wetlands. The method employed for this wetland reconnaissance is not intended to produce a map showing exact wetland locations and boundaries. A wetland determination provides only generalized and approximate information based on a brief site investigation. , Approximate wetland location and extent are subject to change based on a detailed and more thorough site investigation and professional land survey. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ethan Rosenthal Natural Resource Specialist S:\NATURALIEJRO\TCIW0006\WTLDRPT2.DOC N O T E S N 89' 32' 30" W 19,80 1. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS W Z PP #3115 COUNTY SURVEY 27,640. a Q i la iii — — 89' 32' 30" W 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. DEA IS NOT CO CC 367.45 25 RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES < ~ 0 THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION W 0 • • \ DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT. s N CC F. 3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT. ; Q = S c EXISTING 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN PROPOSED 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON ODOT 0 g w (FOLLOWS ELEV. 134.0) (FOLLOWS ELEV. 137.0) BENCHMARK N0. Y.672 1976, ELEVATION 198.84 Ht" C FEMA PANEL # 410276-005, FEET, N.G.V.D. 29. -co' MARCH 1, 1982 oEwn�K W 3 Q Ln a°o 0 N � Z a N TAX LOT 800 6" MAF LE `-� a co ° � � PARCEL 3 s- MAPLE �; \ 0 3 Z TAX LOT 801 \ a. ■ N 89. 57' 11" E 59.26 ? 3 . _. S 00. N 49" E �8, \ .. \ 20.00 ]] s\MAPLE I • \j6. EXTRUDED CURES. \ r — �N, jg 18.38 \\\ STORM CE3 240.50 `'� 20. 24 ` r ii\o, TOP=9 9 47� ' '� . • A IE OUT=96.47 218.41' --.. --- N 89. 57' 11" E 442. 4 10 PEAR / 16" CHERRY 6 t. • v' .� W • v 6" CHERRY 26" ASH �l (� zI FANNO ; . \ PGE #7208 L E G E N D NO w CREEK S / 8 CFfERRY I W/TRANSFORMER $�.TeO' 1 STREET LIGHT CATCH BASIN TypgC/r 5 89' 57' 11"\W pl ET TAX LOT 900 60.00 1/ / DOWN GUY ANCHOR z< ng / / �7 FIRE HYDRANT a< eg U . . . . . . . \ (. — I 20' \ -0- POWER POLE i z 1 f "��\. I n �1< ii>Z � _ / ' -,� WATER VALVE J O PLOT#2 / � v --OHP OVERHEAD POWER t • C1) ° -1 —'" "' EDGE OF PAVEMENT •\-------TOP OF BANK PLOT#1 t`? o I o zo < TOP OF BANK / \ • o , Z --- CREEK o C\ . . • • I 0 "s m rn --- EXISTING 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN F,, • PROPOSED 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN• ti Icn . . . . . . .. — —j c,+ 50' SETBACK I — — — — — PROPOSED EASEMENT CREEK ArlilL' g g 1 SCALE: 1" = 50' LOT 20 0 25 50 100 8 o NNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS) .s:. o _ Figure 2: Site Photo IC c c yr' i= . s w 1 liar • . - ' - ' - ..:- '.._ ,....- . . ,.-. ..,,, I4P3PIIIIP 111111.1.1. IOW ' A ,.,i Property adjacent Approximate edge of to subject property 50 foot Riparian Setback (adjacent property) Area based on City of Tigard Edge of riparian forest Area proposed Water Resource Overlay associated with Ball Creek to be developed Approximate edge of 50 foot (TCI easement) Riparian Setback Area based on Border between subject Entrance to DEA findings property and adjacent property subject property •�,. ` _ ..... . m T •, \ • ' '., i t 4 --3 1� 1... Jl •«:7'71 • '''..-L- "r v. •_,,,,•••:., 'r j� •I`� 1.-' >.yaY ,a ' s,a- 'M : \154 ' ,� I y ',�\• �t►y 'i .``0• T=•�• • 4 • I , ' • r•• 4,41.! N��/ •� " —• ' , � • 1 �b�a4r is9 1` i �'rt13:.1,?;K4r•ie ` `• ' t , At \ - , ,,,.•. ,� T. }� , •`"' /,r' i• r E J"'_+.fir♦ �' • "1 , r ►- I K rJ,i 4 '4 , ' _tj• �•'•"R AMh.°14e'^. •'.''••'P S •;• ' ( I'•`,.ewvs .1. /-?:• / .lI° •li 1 / ••� _ _ -•• ..ice \. / \• • ' / / ;� i ' /••• •;.•.-.#:.•� ,." _ ,•TiKary Se stag@.: "•�+.. ■ ■ ° \ '-;• /•.r• L ,, 'fig 1 2'• (.. -- Tr Isposai ti�� y }5 i��y��('�// ; • -� _• 111 r, J 'p'�y 4 . o. Estd!?}• " • t �c ••r'S� A •fir. � ..:iI) I 4: •,•.7 � :;� :'•ir• ••• - �': • - tiMY �.`i••• S :�' 11�y/ rlv `•^. .•� .;I ./• ^,)11 jill,,'"F' 1. , . ,00• y ::,, ,,f i 44 T ,pF fP• c� \\\•••1`• x' 18`% / ,'c 1~ .� N~ .11,, .•.•. :•. az5° a• f.'Sx itopi• 00'WK.! •:�' a -FOI`(t'� � .•')/•It Ii i;Sit,, i rws -r Bl, .PC, ' �_- e ' '.r • •' `•rte, .. ... , •• f p yy - - •/.;�� y^T `// �f, •' • J •$onl'7j ---25' -•--I} ,, l,' -II.. �,,.•.:..-'/I. / - /, ; _ - ,'sue : , ;.;�y- -- •wJ�r,, y V- ''� a lHfi�i �1 aD •- �\ "29• , r; Jsi •1 ,■ Yt j .•r .s _. . I. C `12 r t.; .-. - .Ma ',• /:,:g. • :- - • ;' / y / :s 1, J• ;:'. : Project Site ,,y :;!! � ��,, e u � 7 4I ;� =�; % :. • 174 r E '1 • M1Y•1$"h S �+ I v ��• / ir : ;x r• i 4 , !� l ` * I I� " = . " 7 ° — - 3ow }�_, / :• 1i1r/ r- r . •' ,� . _.1 .• 1... ...I, ) ./.... .• 1 ).0! k / ..., 18t�_ /s D()Ji •+urx-'`�✓ Roao �, I • T:� f ;� Y 11", •• e� i ■il- '�PFOI1 �•j14d . '1-•, '1 .i" 441 V , ] , . ^- it ti' _ �- (�`a •- 4 • } `y a 3' it J� I �0 `�_ :.,.; il.,.'iiiii_...t•-• ly,,,4,44.,.• L_ /VD j—`=•.. , 31• •-• ^ `� �� 3• ^ ).;-4,..•,,f<. + ' #Gravel'tii• r '1. : " P �Y , ,;o.._.' :. _• ';•.j yi• o27 c ( p s „ i ' R2OWf: t• ` I :a 0,, r 171 . ' j ' •Gi• / 'm ` y .V,59 Tra,lef_- i. , r , .-i• Oi W /y �''� 1 =. 4-4.-2. / ��/ -� • jf PEMi K1(x. + / ;si//f'/'�: -�,;r. - �, -.��r - `/sO `l''=-e 1 -_▪• e q I/27•' .t g• ; • -s-o-} /0!.� rte-. 7 n / ] ::::.i•- •! i 12 •n/, .` t_ .,; .:::r. 11 'l R. v eCaS'.PETCFtsas q • �-�., •:idt -TC D .rte ,, .I -7t:!--....”' --� •p-a.1 OR • _ j iI mona I 1 _ •r� i•_ •. = _ Cem• }rl CO4Jf7 Yo C'lUB. ' . if :.` ) • rr II ) "" ir. it r yt a /t. �- I ! r l' F + /_ _.„.„• / 1IY -` Ir. x .rte-.-•--. �s -POWKZx -':4 '\--5 PEMIW ,z° .4' ,- U „ i Y AEafV.°z , POWKZx Pssir - -a►nnr . T 1. •- � , .•i Figure 3 National Wetlands Inventory, Beaverton Quadrangle CO N 37A • 378 (Joins sheet 44) zf.,..v, -, slqr . ..,,,,,,„. 3,s eirwo.,...-„,,, 6•.„:It • Op . . - a iv-i17,,_,,-..",.."4,..417Vri , ..7,0s;, " jir err,..! tv/0-''' ..14.... ' % VA, r IP.37B I. :7.... i. wiloSkiittel:,,..:. i: ,i., 4. 1 ,0)21D :.I'" , '' 4 • '*- • 1 76 -• * 11 r-..L.'.,..• „....-•'C .4 L•ti 21C • ,.... %.:,i,r,.. • trti. 11 ;eet Site '7 , 4‘...s,.... '''', '...••- lf4,91/ ' il.•:.,11:libi)°...I:.'11- .,..; ft:: ..A....i: r%11:77.1..41'..r." tt;•P'1.n-J:14L:‘r:N. er.' ;:i: .45"‘i ;:' .... :;°14.7,.,..p'....'tzt.lise i:. trt!"tfi:,;:::- ii:IA • (41404 -. ' . '- - ‘1.. 00;01*Y . . 7/ ..., 7 ..;••• •• i 4''..r. :'-‘. I-' 7.".. .:: :„.0 1_, :' 1, ... .. ••,. 7 , ...x . ,,... 13 ,• -,,,,,‘„,, . .4g, :;..-4......,,,t.... -,- 1/4; 1 All 1,4.T .• - 1 • - • . 2?- :-... - ,..•, -it tr.- ....--' itik ".. 1 , , I,. ' ,, ',„ L. ,...-4,. •• A : ' '•"' g. . i .., ,... ...-se,._ . .,-. ..6- ..• ,..,.4. . • 1.4,-;.: - Art..-- • .--../ ■ 37B 65 j * ,9:441,,;, '. v41 ..,,,.,,:„., 1.„0100001 -1 I - . s...•„.4.,,,` " It .fts.', e -.-itrj -1St%745,i'llta.,...1, k4,44014 '42 • I jp,41,4101;.... ..•,8,..,v- ,'....=,i.o. ....__. : /if:4 - ..,..,7: . t.,;:io-J•,,,z,..est,..is.,,,i,,,,,:!:,,r_.,..„---Ap:7„,.j....1,4. -&-,,,....4..,-;4 1 22 *i / 1. --' L''',.$•,.--' ,,.,4s. Y. :.: . I.,,,-. . ...... /I/ ..5.ZA . . F . - : - • .„ . _,, ' -- 42 . i ' r A ' • . 15 ir)1‘ "d•,-■1' 11.1'),StiNti -1-1/ . .., • ,•,--.,.... -... *•.,1/44;er 411161 . .,...... -,,,:,...1.: 1,1?; t .4. ,,„ raw I -,. .r-•; •• , -3?,k. ....... .. ......% - w,... i ,.., - , , .37-• .' 1 '. -' v 3- • . 3ni ? • . ..,, -4,41. iti ...to t &i‘ '■"%I V • 2. • t 6,1 'LY•'''.. ..i ; ••• i ,• r 'NO " -'-'"7•• i 'x t, . , , .... *'.•-• 4111% - - , or 4,•1, 4 7...?1, 0,4., 22 ' ..., ' 1 , •••-.14 • / • ... ,-‘ 40..;. -8‘4,1'. ''' 1-• -... Ned. :Ilf -C r.i'..f 37: ' 1 ..",• -i 1 tr% .. --,/ , --- '. 37A • t.• ' • r:•4•V1 ,Y a 1..,•Al -*'- • , •- ", •!', I \ .'; r s f/ 1 '-.:i 31,'IA.'1.;';',;='--xf-% 7--v-r....•-e. '3"...'.5 - -71 k' ''.'. .- ' • ' ' 14 ' JI,' 1 ;....d . i ••• i ,,,j reecss,,.4. t. ..,1.• ,;°tizi'"-...• r,..t,'.-',1 '(-‘47j•Ce•-• AS ' .... •;-,1 ) ' '^ 1 . ....../,e0„,,,,,,,4114, . s. ' ..1110/ i,liit' ar. .s•' ''..44;.„!, , .04- a • - gia•_,„. •ti. - ---..1.... 146. Wt.',"•.;,..47,et!:- 7r4I- .,. ,:..,,,..., .,7,,, ,,:splir. '30 -„,- .,,"Nk.z.. . --,1.....„1,2j.X i9 , 1. :ii,,,-‘,•. f.,fottslitTlaN'...-- .F,rt‘ - -1r,,f.....,te tW' .9-1P"irgi•tf4.4'7'•,01111111111 Sr • 1....74.1,c u. __oft;''' •,,•.;,,-,..,L , ...,LL -...itcr"-1116.3%,,,, -1,k1k„,a) •••■• .■14 I.• I. 1 lolc ' t'l'••it ••' V4 ...s. - * '40.16,' ' • -..j.ertfs'alailffler- '---""...4;*31k,i,;14 - . ES; •2 .'14-- ,..'t-. - • . ar'.6'rt A 414gp.it'''z'S ••••0•• .-4.7....,„...: 7-VellitittAivt*. .A..k.i, .., A.• •' • '.0••;..- - '•eligr,l.;,,,i,•••V • • .1. ■'I'q114• u) , . .iltipi...Sr'. ,„,..:•••vow. 1.,II -,••••77.4,5„,4;t4.2,2,,, J.L.I. .4.4*-4, • .,, ;4..me. Atf,.. ...,,,...T ...,"",,,,4r4k, _,,, .. a •• . ,i, A C‘i 4 '4.' .- .. , ,..t.. Agi.,,,,...e..7..--.-..,,,,:t.....-,, ,,,,,, - ...... •• .,-14 .,,....i.,:-...„----.. • .:1-10••;),.7, , • ,si _______ „... ..,.. p.:;.:.,,, •. • ., -,: 7 ii-e)W•4'771•11.....,"'••--tet'''. .1"•%,,%;`''..t, ,- •• .. , ..,...... , _.A11'. .' ' ' '"1 I. ' ......,.74:-..%•,,,,.1''' '''.1., 1 ......„, , "...., . ,-.., . . - 't% - ."' - . -:' a t,...A0.-' i`.1 .•.:1.„..":•.,:v-..,"IP ' .e?i‘ g 4, /". 'A IN,..I.4..e,:9•-••••f'rk • N • - ..,1■,-,. -, , .0:4-, ....,,e,r. , . -,r, ,,,,,11\. , ,, v: t , i A. , ' .`: :AP,. p. ..,:,...:,,,..,,...,:., t ,i 41%- i . ,. 41. :.' ..A.. ..,,-,:.•-,,' . -J ;-.1.-.,: ' '‘,06/4;., .., ' ...1-Zis 3...•'.-4`.?..-• - ,,t,... A ,t,‘• t.,'. - .4•,---- '., ,1;-,..- 1 • • l' .....: f ila - ,,,.. ".n,..,' ,;it',,_ ‘ ....' T::714:101' 4,1 t, .:,..At, --,-,4", ..", ' ,,,_•., V.-,.„.•16,_' „ .104 --,,,,, ..li•A 4, r ' ,. lil 1,C.. Nrii..,. .:11.e.:. .F . ,%II' ..... •-='‘...........,,I• ;.., .It,*"..,"''. •At 4_-.1)6.1... ‘„, ... -.'..."..' "- ),-X.I,'d •' .,.. . ,,, .....-4.4: -...... 0 ....m...... 4""-•,,, , :•11 ---` ' '., 1", "VA..' . . • '..t1.4.2.- p .4-imitr-,70' 'O. -;'.; •"N•:', Si ,4.,' :44 :t. ''\'i'.tit,',`-' Aseit..•:.'4'. .;.•, ...zip 141 ;:ri 1..°5''' r• --.4 r; -'1'''.:1- ' ...' st".1117' 0161,4 -.I '...'" '' ..._ ' '4 i./. Ilf•.•-• P-,--' '•:.i.a.,- :•t.",. : , 'I apt.Al'OA rekvst 11-4'."'', X'-' ?'-4.11. • ' ..:- .c.4.... -- ..• i,,i. . _ . ,Z'S` g •...,, •, ' et....v .,w ,1,714 -, . . ‘. t ,...,oft7 i:•-.1. r ■. 1 , . ' `.--,1V-a.1 0.- ' : .:-. .:t■Nr,,l- ji,411 . \ii. • 'V.'--- ' \I , . . - , -•-, .; -1•,,4 . • 1'1. -.rig 11 1 :‘,. ,..4., . ., f.,i.:.:4k.i.;.i, ,-: - ' .-. it . . '- ,eviAgt: 71,. y i .. ..,.._ , i.,:,. _:,..._,t....:-, . .• . . ... .. , ... ‘.. • • ......... ... ,,,.. .„ ... :, , . 4......• Il• .u-4-a.-"ill■ ..- - § 4 , iltr , .-.3. ... ,.....g. , i(ct,-....4 ctragame„_,......•-__ iv.- ...........,--zet ... ..... f .... . _ . A ....1,1 .."°- ,...r.........."-_■,' mg t'a",44.4 4 t . rf", •° ;3 ' -= '' •%,-, •i/84:•-1--- - .- ',1,'-',...•Ajr i'--.•.4M1.-'",•I'2.:_ftw.. „1........._ ;,k it.t,..,,9,-, ...N.,,,,,,...... . __,---......"- ,,,' ..',..4 ., *.„-F.1-, -a e.'•3713 • ' e'art '•27.1-7,11006.. . i r‘-lit, , s •- ...„...."' . 4 - - . 12.4e•kb-ttg,Ck..r,v.(4.5713.1a .*111/X-', Tr-, 444•4 8 it, .,„mit B 7 ‘ • -;•:::kr.," - •rt••:44,, --- 37A'.'' .....,0,./13,„ . . , , , ••••••- ' c:. ‘,,,..,,e4 la • ,-,0*...„.47,..; -11.. ..:-,' i7 .... ''' • ;t' T•32 • • t v.. Vet.; .37* VW ,es •'s. ...st.t...„, 10 t - - '• ••••,‘•:- 13 *C'' t 14,- ' ' ' ' g . ‘... - ., ... -. .. * ..r-. , '41% maszfregg * WS •:4e.. . 4".•10....... ;44 e- 4 .•4..:iL,l 7.•, 6,..•r rn. rt.•il, " . 0, ,54-,;• -2 .-"1-N i..._:a--4_..--_--."..'0•.0-.•.7:--...N.,, ,.-,..1.....`_,..0." '...._.-, i l t..s„*. a■4t„ictt.,...„,A„.„v.j,,-I • "tf5a o 13 . , .: .cc..,, .. :91_ :,,, :-.-.72,ribia 4.,•jit f . .V- •611:p..-r''', ,..' • -, -A,'-.--- '-.. - . , * 422,. - ' ,•.-1,- 1•r€.„'.6 0 1 -9111°151140r,, , •.:•:*f,i.,,..,,,,IIo.pZ' „-...--: #--)'.., -t.i. ......."-V•.-..':i'r W f i,•r,y-:t'.a7,_1V,....V.,-....i1..t c.i•f'-r,i So 3 1 CS ',r:,, •.F'•,...,,•....N..,‘-.,..4.. .1i,te.iti,..:,.•-••:••.-•.:.•..•-...i• ' e0,f•;•',A''••1.•.1 37D . .,...•'_. 4.: .. . `'-I '4.-4, VIL: ;g:21P ,P ''94 ./ ■ .::... ..... 0.- . ..•,,...0 t: ....... .„ . .. _,...., } , ..,. 4, , ..„ • ..- e.,. 4,.. ,5'.••.■l'- - . •.4., t. 5.i..,:,e,,, _diiiirrasiir-.4 ‘,,. itiofr45 .1.:4:6_ ,./.. ....,...,:‘111117------ iliw., , ...7 . .1 1.;‘:•,' Pir';'rjvc‘-' 111.4:11! )4.":1::7^ 4S°'Ill' - l'N V v. •, I.1.-7 7.1.,- • .. ' 'N';''" , ;-,i o "." 11. r "i ce.11`4 ' • .4.S.ro '.' ' 4.... , ,.. • - 1.--. t-t -5,.'.,1` , , 4- --.ea. It ;,. t•- i,.0 A:-.4% .., ■'''''-irtizu.-. at't . --. 37 C i 4,ocoorr E I , II 4•16..iir''erk , ', .tilif- 1 (toms sheet 49) '-50 Figure 4 Washington County Soil Survey, Sheet #47 Wetland Routine Onsite Determination Data Sheet Project Location: Tigard.south of intersection between SW 74th Avenue and Bonita Rd. Field Investigator(s): Ethan Rosenthal and Jennifer Hom Plot or Pit No. 1 Applicant/Owner: Applicant:ICI Cablevision Property Owner DHK Properties,tic. Date: 8(13/99 County: Washington State: OR Plot or pit location: Approximately 30 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 25 feet south of the forest's edge. Prevailing Weather Conditions: Overcast,70 F General Site Conditions: Riparian Forest Is there noticeable disturbance of this site's native vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology? None Vegetation: Indicator Dominant Plant Species: Status Stratum To Cover 1 Acer macrophyllum FACU T '70 2 Alnus nibs FAC T 10 3 Rubus discolor FACU S •80 4 Rosa nutkana FAC S 2 5 Eprlobium sp. 2 6 Solidago Sp. H 2 7 8 ---- 9 - =dominant Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC? 0% Soils: Series/Phase: Quatama loam Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Y/N No Soil profile: 0-7':matrix=10 YR 3/3,no mottles. Shovel refusal at 7". Other hydric soil Indicators: Hydrology: Visual observation of inundation. Y/N No Visual observation of soil saturation. YIN No Depth to saturated soil: >7" Depth to free standing water: >7" Drift lines. YIN No Sediment deposits. Y/N No Drainage patterns. Y/N No DEA Wetland Determination: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Y/N No Is the hydric soil criterion met? YIN No Is the specific hydrology criterion met? YIN No Is this plant community a wetland? YIN No Comments: Based on professional opinion,the herbaceous layer was not used to determine hydrophytic vegetation. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2828 SW Corbett Avenue Portland,Oregon 97201 (503)223-6663 FAX(503)223.2701 Wetland Routine Onsite Determination Data Sheet Project Location: Tigard,south of intersection between SW 74th Avenue and Bonita Rd. Field Investigator(s): Ethan Rosenthal and Jennifer Horn Plot or Pit No. 2 Applicant/Owner: Applicant TCI Cablevision Property Owner:DHK Properties,Llc. Date: 8/14/99 County: Washington State: OR Plot or pit location: Approximately 60 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 15 feet south of the forests edge. Prevailing Weather Conditions: Overcast.70 F General Site Conditions: Ripanan Forest Is there noticeable disturbance of this site's native vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology? None Vegetation: Indicator Dominant Plant Species: Status Stratum %Cover 1 Rubus discolor FACU S 4 2 Rosa nutkana FAC S 4 3 Phalaris arundinacea FACW H '90 4 Epillobium sp. _ 8 5 Rumex crispus FAC+ H 1 6 7 8 9 10--- =dominant Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAC? 100% Soils: Series/Phase: Quatama loam Is the soil on the hydric soils list? YIN No Soil profile: 0-10":matrix=10 YR 3/3,no mottles Other hydric soil indicators: Hydrology: Visual observation of inundation. YIN No Visual observation of soil saturation. YIN No Depth to saturated soil: >10" Depth to free standing water: >10" Drift lines. YIN No Sediment deposits. Y/N No Drainage patterns. YIN No DEA Wetland Determination: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YIN Yes Is the hydric soil criterion met? YIN NO Is the specific hydrology criterion met? Y/N No Is this plant community a wetland? YIN No Comments: Based on professional opinion,the shrub layer was not used to determine hydrophytic vegetation. David Evans and Associates,Inc. 2828 SW Corbett Avenue Portland,Oregon 97201 (503)223-6663 FAX(503)223-2701 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES �TTI (ANON Community(Development (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) S flaring ABetterCommunity NON-RESIDENTIAL .'-— PRE-APP.MTG.DATE. gy�pp-- :; Al 799 STAFF AT PAL-APP.: /'Y - ,k F, •K. . APPLICANT: --rtIt 117 57 l c(J-e-4 Ale LIT--!--12-71S AGENT: Phone: . - 5.2`( el &c, Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: /`7/4 S60 71/x` /� . TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): m m z o r r w, -- NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: ,5 i' -‹.- ..-.... -- = - =_ -- -' `• a.t.i.0 I)ecfec ie6ource e)Ver lej� 1/�ri.�- Keu"Gw � a'fio- - } PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: C r.,.,-� � e /4/cgs-set) 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN s � - MAP DESIGNATION: .-/�(,c[�riac-e -fk z ;/ _dt - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: - _ '- - C.I.T. AREA: ,e FACILITATOR: PHONE: (503 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: - sq. ft. Average lot width: S 7ft. Maximum building height: %.S—ft. Setbacks: Front . ft. Side C7 ft. Rear ft. Corner -' , ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: __7___ % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:.7 S----°/0. (Refer to Code Section 18. 5-3 O l ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2'/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 kCITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 NON-lesdentiil Application/Plume DrY111011 S mon SPECIAL SETBACKS :- STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. :- FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: :- A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least half ('/2) of the building's height; and The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. [Refer to Code Section 18.130.010.111 PARKING AND ACCESS REQUIRED parking for this type of use: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Handicapped Parking: • All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: [Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Donlon kction • WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) CLEAR VISION AREA T-14e-City-r-ecfuires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) OFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) AdjaLw u�titi�eS tom- �� s°`^ S sub yeuf-, The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: DSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Onision Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Chapter 18380) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7751 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall C include specific recommendasfor achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: - A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIKE PATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM1 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON Residential AppLation/PInnmg Dimon kaon • WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT -- WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams:. Streams which-are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. p� ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.791.030) -Varian Setback Reductions The-DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area, ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.1001 REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS --TRE -RAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.] _REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. :- If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. :- The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning Orman Section NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/loading Requirement) 8.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) - 18.715(Sensitive Lands Review) 1 8.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Yariances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations)18.190(Tree Removal) 8.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) o� 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(lot tine Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) - 18.745(landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Hone Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANTSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicant's are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Drvaion Section BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: cw j if(e. 3 keri a-(-t'.-vv, -6 Setnc-7iktue, l- c /1,0ccter• scwtccc 'Net/ be coon e fcct-t v-ta Occevn ber , 1°19`l Re USA rcu;ew tf roar(�c�-,.. V :-/9e e✓Icroac . l oo a plat Iti de l t n e a-t-t vvti re_ d 5 h ax trefl k f 00: cc- fit s w a..l o vwc a-•-� o X r vwv-d de .e.l op r s-e—A A -f rwr e a S e of -no oc4 . Ma-p f(ocx.4 e(eu d( . D.�. L . A pp-) uk on i1Je( la-& J defter rntna-fi del . rfhca4t- APPti l) ) C t L. I,l)et(c.t....LA ae(i i °c._k r v I et rte+e rvn( r(e,.+ rfU map -,f+reeev,1 i1)c(uLtInn -top ed e of -Flvoduuc YfrearvCfowl 50 r;pct.i an )' R `'P U(A-k rr ,rte wok- ccf ec-c)nuf{ccLQ ( J , st earn - -F (n o p. e abvue_ T vre Ll or 00 d ee r i 11.{re s are. Luti(a-.�cE� or -seek-d i+lam- I (AA-La— a,p p I c Cw,1- 5 etnsr s 4.a(1 10,-/ ca I cw-tu+ dekeron 04.14 t3 114 6f r u.er:a.-Q inuv(vecl w, ctvwwcl GliEstut 401.,vucv yr I AAA cA-fix nn a(fercffr> ' . eubtL eJC cL' .unAu i e c+ Ioccctir-~ - (c+� `fie 11 we.+(u .G�or 4t ova c a, 4 Dad. t rng2, A rAttccjA 1 ►nom- pIcc�!`� { PROCEDURE U Administrative Staff Review. (-fen+aktuell , a Rriocece,e...c i Pt cr not iv-e, defer mttJ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. `"'f 6t` '511-1°.'1"-(1-4(2-4) tnfv<mr�+t reuccRUof `"('pl•(w-{t"_� Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 b 11 inches. One 1 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY 01 TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residenti l Appliation/PInning Dnision Section The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). Y,/ / / �� , Svc('cc�-e f)/a '�"`'c'` '-- PREPARED BY: '�l r .c e. ysrs r��' � a2.- CITY' INC DIVISION T FTiI F PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP.MEETING PHONE: [5031639-4171 FAX: [5031 684-7297 E-MAIL (stall's first name)@ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 2-Nov-99 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES , . ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q City ry� � t Shaping Better Community 2SI IL AL PUBLIC FACILITIES sap A-T r • oa,ND The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ( )_ to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) __ to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: (k-1/ f —v( street improvements will be necessary along 74 k , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb n storm sewers and other underground utilities (—] -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. rev (N2-4 6-414RD s ult-Fok.E) e*s sZ.t.odz ) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 016 Engineering Department Section • ( ) strE • provements will be necessary al( to include: ❑ feet of pavement concrete curb 1 I storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk 1 street trees [1 street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) _ street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( ) Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department SeciJon • are on the opposit( le of the street from the site. If th :e in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW . Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to Water Supply: The _ - Phone:(503) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARII Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Deportment Section newly created impervious ,-faces. The resolution contains a , iision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ( ) Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. c 1 E Los e- iev., A4 1)54.10 vi '61E, U. L.A.-5). TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type of permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit. CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In addition, the p€ ;tee will be required to post a be or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS F SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: - I zl �'(qct ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFF Phone: 1503)639-4111 Fax: 1503)684-1291 h:lpattylma sters\prea pp.eng (Master section:preapp-r.mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF T1CAEO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 016 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171 . Staff: •ha,u,-v .. 40 x Date: 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: • Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization • Title transfer instrument or grant deed • Written summary of proposal • Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) • Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes and a notarized mailing list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see attached envelope submittal requirements) • Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map ❑ Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan ❑ Existing Conditions Map ❑ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan j❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan . Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings ❑ Landscape Plan <--Tiee vvv-A-00-teA tyt surue) / ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan -511 �P° , X v ts"11.1e O inc Ua et Isr 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED cwe Yvu-,,.t +I�v�. The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report El Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24" of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_ 6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ - All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements El Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ y Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ - Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections El City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan y Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ -> A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 FRAI_EY/STRICKER ARCHITE(.JS, PS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE: 11/17/99 JOB NO.: 9946.59 ATTENTION: Matt Scheidegger TEL 206-324-4800 RE: Tigard/Bonita Road FAX 206-322-2875 AT & T TO: Mr. Matt Scheidegger 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached X Under separate cover via: FEDEX the following items: Shop Drawings Prints Samples Specifications Copy of letter Changer Order X Other: Bluelines & See Below COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 24 x 36 of T1, Al, A2, El and Survey 2 11 x 17 of T1, Al, A2, El and Survey 1 8 1/2 x 11 set plus information C e0 r---. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your records Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution Per your request Returned for corrections Return corrected prints X For your use. Other: For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: ?)ease ri ( (ec 0 � h �l- add ec s COPY TO: FILE SIGNED: Rebecca McCray McC/slr of Fraley/Stricker Architects Nov-30-99 05:29P 20e '122 2875 P.02 ��JJU DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. October 6, 1999 _slr su corbctt avenac Port and. Oregon 97201 dame Tel. 304.223.666{ City of Tigard .Addr SS Fax. 03.223 2701 140dieSS REFERENCE: DHK PROPERTIES LLC. SW 74TH AVENUE WETLAND DETERMINATION FOR TCI CABLE UTILITY VAULT SITE DEA PROJECT NO. TCIW0006 (37) To Whom It May Concern: This memorandum summarizes the results of an on-site wetland determination prepared by David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) for a property owned by DHK Associates and Properties, located at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. On behalf of TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc. (TCI), DEA investigated this site to determine whether jurisdictional wetlands occur on-site or on the property immediately adjacent to the subject property tp the south within 50 feet of a utility vault proposed to be constructed by TCI on the southeastern corner of the subject property. Although the City of Tigard's Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) identifies wetlands in this area, no jurisdictional wetlands were found within the study area of this investigation. (See Figure I: Site Map). METHODS The wetlands investigation consisted of(I)a review of the US Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map for the subject area (Beaverton Quadrangle)and the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington County Soil Survey (Sheet #47)to locate possible mapped on-site wetlands and hydric soils. (2)a field inventory of general site conditions, and (3) an analysis of this data. The site visit was conducted on August 13, 1999. The project site was walked and sample plots established to confirm the presence or absence of jurisdictional wetlands using the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). General site conditions and observations of vegetation, soil, and hydrologic conditions were noted. The wetland delineation manual states that wetlands possess three essential characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,and hydrology specific to wetlands. The area was investigated for the concurrent presence of each of these parameters. SITE DESCRIPTION The DHK property currently consists of a paved lot with no buildings or similar structures(see Figure 2: Site Photo). The southern boundary of the property is bordered by several trees—Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). crabapple (Pyrus fusca), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and red alder(Alnus rubra). This border is approximately three feet wide and runs the length of the southern boundary with the exception of a vegetated area approximately 15 x 15 feet abutting 74th Avenue. Douglas fir and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) were noted in this vegetated area, in addition to a utility pole and fire hydrant. The lot directly adjacent and to the south of the DHK property is undeveloped and partially covered with piles of dirt and asphalt. Both properties are bounded by 74th Avenue on the east. Outstanding Professionals... Outstanding Quality 4,1,0•L Des..wu....c. Nov-30-99 05:30P 206 '122 2875 P.03 CJ @:1UJ DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is located to the south of the proposed project site. Ball Creek is a tributary of Fanno Creek and is located in the Tualatin River watershed. The existing incised channel indicates that Ball Creek has been disconnected from its flood plain through this section of its reach. Ball Creek enters the forested area through a five-foot culvert that runs underneath 74th Avenue. The creek is approximately eight feet deep from the bottom of the channel to the top of the bank and is fifteen feet wide from bank to bank. Historically this riparian forest may have been located within the creek's active flood plain. DETERMINATION FINDINGS The NWI does not indicate wetlands on the DHK property; however, a palustrine forested wetland is mapped for the area associated with Ball Creek(see Figure 3: National Wetlands Inventory). The mapped,soil series is Quatama loam,0 to 3 percent slopes (see Figure 4: Washington County Soil Survey). This-rtioderately well-drained soil is found on old terraces. Quatama loam is not considered a hydric soil within Washington County. Cove clay is also mapped within the vicinity of Ball Creek. Cove clay is considered a hydric soil within Washington County. No jurisdictional wetlands were found within the study area of this investigation. This finding covers the DHK property and the adjacent property to the south, including the portion of riparian forest located on the north side of Ball Creek. Please note that this investigation did not look at the western boundary of these properties as no construction is planned to take place within well over 50 feet of the boundary. Two sampling plots were established within the forested area. The results are discussed below. Plot I is located approximately 30 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 25 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the KNHS property. The plant community is dominated by bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum. FACU) and Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor, FACU). Red alder(Alnus rubru, FAC) was also found. The soil is a dark brown(10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles or redoximorphic features. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. It is unlikely that the area surrounding plot I would be considered an active flood plain (i.e. flooded by 2 year flood event) of Ball Creek. Plot 2 was located approximately 60 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 15 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the KNHS property. The plant community is dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). Other species found were Watson's willow weed (Epilobium watsonii), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU),and Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana, FAC). Several well established Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia, FACW)were found outside of the plot area. The soil in plot 2 is also a dark brown (10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles. Redoximorphic features,although few and very faint, were present. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. Plot 2 is approximately 1 foot lower in elevation relative to plot 1. However, it is still significantly higher than the creek bed and is unlikely to flood during 2 year flood events. REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS According to the City of Tigard Community Development Code(Section—18.797.010), Ball Creek is classified as a "Major" stream with an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second. The "riparian setback area" for major streams is 50 feet and is measured from top-of-bank or the edge of an associated wetland. Outstanding Professionals. . .Outstanding Quality Nov-30-99 05:30P 20E '122 2875 P.04 c ),„g:va • DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. • RECOMMENDATIONS As described in the findings section of this report, it was determined that the riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is not a jurisdictional wetland. Therefore, it is recommended that the riparian setback area be established from the top-of-bank along Ball Creek. This will place the outer boundary of the setback area within the unvegetated portion of the adjacent property and more than 50 feet from the proposed location of the ICI utility vault. This boundary is different from the City's Water Resources overlay, which places the boundary within the DHK property (see Figure 1: site map). If you have any questions regarding the findings of this report, please feel free to call me at(503) 499-0572. NOTE: Findings of DEA's investigation will be based on the site information collected at the time of our study; our understanding of the 1987 Corps of Engineers(ACOE) Wetlands Delineation Manual;and our understanding of federal, state, and local regulations governing wetlands. These regulations, delineation methodologies, and wetlands themselves may change over lime. A DEA Natural Resources wetland determination memorandum is not to be used as a fully documented wetland delineation report to the environmental regulatory agencies that exert jurisdiction over wetlands. The method employed for this wetland reconnaissance is not intended to produce a map showing exact wetland locations and boundaries. A wetland determination provides only generalized and approximate information based on a brief site investigation. Approximate wetland location and extent are subject to change based on a detailed and more thorough site investigation and professional land survey. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ethan Rosenthal Natural Resource Specialist S:NATURAL IRO‘TCIW0006:WTLDRPTI.DOC EJRO:SFJ Outstanding Professionals. .. Outstanding Quality Nov-30-99 05 : 32P 20e '22 2875 P-08 1•;` ems, j+-r ,l. L- .� :�v� ' .,..ii-'2,;i4 E.• • ^1";`54• 7•46:1W:•-.4-11!'"a,, N. �� /K •yOj'• .fit '►�� ,- y :�i+r a a._..-. _. - a. :�. . ,.; !ti �1•• N:�.•f•r�` t'••��;�- ,�.'+•".� .. A`fe - Pte' tr •�St -�i ,>:e _-• _ • 4 a . � � T r�>" ••:� :4..-1•� • • .l �••jK1 y �Slle• �._13.1;>i�!'�. \� "r' . itm• No Viiv.,..A.nsiail irr.,,...,. /-74.-....- sVI: ----- ..•. NIX- • -: . r 9.: / •.. ' !p '•yy.•2-'P•• . .•• AM,A•ai.r. r� .p �• E _� k 4arx ∎ I• !,,P'.-6 T' l 7-•i .1 : . ?K.e f%MiY''.istht. . '::F� S� M 4I ,' s.}.. �"�Foi. -I:']' fit/ /� /• C^ f r ••••a � g � Y .agaii , y i •• 40 ,•-' /.. r \ "i• '•_i,• '')', '4.: • ',..4..-. • . .---• -'-.-.--"‘ r.• .•r 't 7 - .-• • .- ••_.../ - 37•Nt\s,c.„:• i! ,...:',I.P. - ....! ,/:%--„_•",•, „ !‘I11;i 1 r _i �i';:!‘'. f :-' : , : .• :':. .▪ "5fl 1'°w.,:•. „.•. sdblKik ' .7 ' -Faiw .-... .. • �'6 - ' ,:r•.a .V .IF LC , -.;-/-..- `' 4••.f.-Y.. 41C•D .,0 ,. ✓: • :F• •tw; ,.,• fir. 0 —• 1 :„i ; _ ••-ril^ :'. . •• . . - :.„. *rot •�1, ._ j�,1! �;i`'',. - r.' •r '�"•;. ” {•..-'"r •:.1.••.* �. -j.• .a�° :'s •PFp IY • • - s?fn,Tf . I� RGpt•1 -•11 1 4 •• i y� Tr._ .., s� •�rtr .. •I �,`•_:t• 4: • . _ '--••%'��▪ .',,•,:.! ��•T • ,ar7,�lY Jr . ----/' ; Q At 1`►•.'. J/; -iii'. �'• 31 ' 1''‘..: "41:;. -• : .' 1. Project Site••4- -/' %•O' i/. ▪... .0, ► �`'• y 4-* : 20E '22 2875 P _ 09 Nov-30-99 05 : 34P (4) N 3 ()orris d..'he*,44) 3 76 A -,..-...•.m.. IR .rtiz..... _..,x6,4,41ii .....2rr,. --- •-m. .....)..it ,,,„t,.=.-.0'w--- .....:..-.. ..,% '7,-.-.. ‘91-....x. --i 'N t. enp --..-i, - .4.i.i.,...t m-,,. . ,is :a.lielifiy.)7,:iWO.;1.2147%,Tr,- -....! ci,VI -41 ... 4 i. .-k-s- ,L4er.,..)!Ir4 --t ' ' i . , i': k•-. . e. : iii'Y' t4tfigrogiV ' . '-,,tN. I . •. , A. ..2' 7 • ; .., .2 • ; 7 K 1' 'IP.•" 4r fil:_21C ,.. o. n ...••■■ A... -.-1/."%ii .. 4.. • .-.,•,,' ....-. ...., r r. ::-.-. a. •. ...,„,„ Li ,. ,.. ...:, „...-. ' '''''•>,..:,:r.... :.•:;;_:.:,.:-...ailiff....-0..zie::,.....;::::040.7_41:::.'4 1.4:11-`,1.- .I.g.:1.I...::: s..1::7.6::41:la':• ..1...1.". P..:ri°)..Ir...;,:k..:c." ,..... ......,. ...,,,1,,,. l'1 A '....1..1.1;v't.- -7'.:' 'L.i.i 4 i-- s- • •i• a ':' ...' ,• 4rgifil.. ...,411.1. C14, . a I A-. .' 1 • 1 1'.. 7 - 4 •It-4,4.1- ,.•:.:-., 4 . A I 7....iil 7.. `..... •, .1", sji 4.1:•K I .,11.1t...,... A ; , , .■ 4 C;,., ...1 . e: % • .41 ii i.e.:)..4.4. . ....0:-.:: ..fl •-mrirtts4 - 4 . '., LlAileglir '1;(1-24e F .. ,,.. ..-. .-.1V-1:7447 4 ,•;u1 41/4 . li Q15,0105').5.11it.::::` vicito... , ii.,...44/011pira7 1-,..; • .. 11P-1.1". • ,. tu4' . ii,• •:'re.:' ..",:■';.4 f'r ;re*:....tu.:2" gpr 378 I. ; •rhl.:.1:".;• . 4 :4414 .4, .. •••••:' 1 - . ..,,' ;. •• ,L... ..f• ••• •- .••Ifff ;, ,.‘41-7. ,N4rits4"4;-.34eagapare•- 1 . ,i-_:%":._,. . .:.. &.7.--;• .....,.., ; 1•• cfs,;...t. .f..5t;',..c#, ...-;.•!...4...i..,....1,,:i liff.....:keirt'Ll. .'::7,74viA\74: 22 A ...k....:, . .. 42 ;*4.r.• #. .... t .,:. 15.-.i,i• t 1•,.:... +-..... ....,„ li,.. •,,... ,. . . ,,........,.. , :... 1%,*: ...4 -- . Yi :%, f• 1 #::... . .- .... : ...::;-:.: : i..%., 4. .....f- • 4•?;if.; '. -".....,;•1414.4 ..;•?1:.,;:•:5....iiiiPle...#11s.....f...f44....;:i:11M1.nw:,..4' - li? - , ,-- • ...., ..- - - - - ' •••••••••• s••••'•(...: ' ' t; ' . •• • .1,-; ..• t -,), .. -.-4,,,-...f: , 4. 7 - -r 01.4... . l 1. •Ii.t%)4110,..§.- ' ;- ,-2..-.4,., .. 1, . . -.-.....0 , ) . .- re, -. . --•,. •!.....,.... . ,,,....:. , . ..t. .. ....74,13 -5. ' iN•• 4, ' -. -: • 4.!.. • . •4 . • ' -lc. 1. „pt. •..,.; 3••••••-• ..- , ; . .. ; 4, 4....a.e. ••••60 4" 10 i t-'.. c. .. .. ,-47........ ,,,e .. 1.•. .- :: d ii•:_ 1:- --LI',. ... . , ,,,.:. -..,:),. . .2 ,if: v r kw .•.. %.. ..+ . 22 3 ,.. • • ....• • .„ .....,. t 4 1,tf,' 'tp :.. .•• it • '. ,. '....\ -.... •• ‘.„ ... 37: I e.r. .., ; -131--4“.,... 4/0 ...•;11t I• . :c75 , 1-4t:41',1 -: ----. -ri., #7,,,,•-;.e.,eff., ;.,' l• v.....),. , : , . ---..-:. .•-4, - v...... -"-. • .4.;-. .-• n4 •/ 1 . -• A-Cott:, ..-.....,;... .1 . . , . . '• .'' • • =„.04. . ..41 : _,d CA It•T.. •' e-•',' ) .,f •ji r.la •A 1 ' .v...7 1%.,0 • • ,,,,......1 : .. •■•• ";' ps i.t. ....'; ‘.; ii -.'...... : 41.74-11X4' "‘•'r - ;'.. ‘. ' -e, :"... ,10-- 1-. a' ..:..... ''i' 31 ..A. . -: i•:-:1:4-%IVA -,. -4,1:...- ... . . Nil, 1 r dkv.;--/• --‘!- to , i.- _ ,.... u.%.....,........e'amil '''...vt..........11ArohiN ....A ,,,,1710444.4,4 „, ,; .. . :,..,, 74.rez.ri.,.. 1....4 •-•.;-•••- .. ;..... 1. .•• •:•,•1••••..,-,....r• - tO a 4‘ .- '-'•■••.-•-..1%1__.,_44;..-- :*i&I-‘*-:1 • .'.‘4A-441Bikefill'.t"':%:14:;- :'''',a)kkCi?-3,4. '; .1% .,.41.t i.,;.ir. ---7!,y4,--;::,s- (Agr.rdiv-.--,.:.-..' q.-5.4-1, 4 , ,.ir,t1.4-....:!,:.5...3 4.•:.;-!;F:„.•"-"4,Sai5.!".4.41:4-,74'4,r.,t--6•'',•,.-.1"A. 44,216... . _W ,.• - •... , ....'......L.jp r it .... ... .1.... ■ZZA,•*.tAir .N., 44 0. :14 --e, kr4441T 1 1..-if: o.; ;:e!;?'•t't.,. . 41:i-,4 4 1 . -...°4-'1.0,1*.f,r:'-' rbA•11 r r *Z1- 4.1 It..-: glkr - .. ..a 7"nr", --.,- ,_•-.:.d i ..i.: ',,.- - ---• ----: ,-, .f.-'-elY -.4.1••4111.3.1' '7 '4, ' ; 44'1:•• J.:' :ZI fl.:•:. -4.T.:4:-.- r i....2...:-- -7.r.ti- , ''' ":1V. •'A -11;• ‘, ‘ivit:',■•• eC4Z--rilii ,-.1 }:;.:1•.. 1.4 4..c. :e..1 .4 ' Ir. •.".1 .61 .4.v,, -.... .. .ii ji. • • .,,. ,-t...I:. . Y%- ,z....--.. •.4 t,.)i. .ILL ,,,,:•.i.-7.t.;,N,, • i ...v...•1 0-,114 rt.:`.1,...r.:„..--1.-• 7, ,"1.• - • ...- „;..-....:71,--- *Rh, W.., .' VA.-,9 if,. •: ! - t-ift-z.--;;:jr,:11;.›..-.Z7.' - .1, ',e...i.--.y.:.. ' .r;,:.1:.--:;?:-.--..t! -',...__ iii .1 :...-:.4.--.:;;-,4,47.;:31,1.. --1--,41,1K--...... .'1.4V.1.1:if • tAF.:4:";11r:.:7:1 'N't,.-.71 z!' i",ie",..47.'-1 . %.".....t'.--- -.4.i •:- r -.:-_-.: ,*4-7,-;-.,tx.:. .ri., y....smor.:4,.-4.; -, . 34:75.-;:o.4).ir orl-f-v-: ' r:r ."=.,:::,----- 11..1...• -•.:-.4 .. 1r: - --- - . 4 -:,... .....-...-•-. --...--: tivoz--.• • • . tit: i--iN, A,4.c.„--,-nof .1-;:t46.W -i!i.- .-11..:1 .: •,•.: ,- ' ,.1 e,'44,- . -•• . •• • •1 ''...%. .t.t-.-vrA44 • -%. . "4•44.-. C.,..•,..81 ,,•••• - •• •tit,.. , min'rrISS; • :•••:.'set '• •• :v14,. • • i ,- 4 ...... e- ....:-.• .0. • i 44 •,...;....fif .7". -' ' -• •jowl.. ..01'".3 • 17 fr'14.0'°6 r•- . .4.4 "t54‹:- • •-1 " • . 1:';-'4Z.4--- . . . . ;L. . .;"..Z..: .1" • ,e, '- '.'• 4u ..).;. .:::-"e;fur 1:sir i .e. ;-z,.. '• .;.4.t ?Wt.- ;•;-....'"A, ',4:4.,•.• .. wl7,:‘ -.:-.' .. 'V -r.. .- _. ,. :,, . 1.1.- - ,..Aw.-"'-•4•.• . ail •-• - • lt • • -.4,VI- gw"- - . ',. ' . ., •-",'• lei.a.li • -'''C' •'. '.") ' a • ••••••••IV■P:I•NFI• Fig .•g--".. ".: .• '•• • ' '-' 4-'1'- ,"1 , --. ' • - .,......$ '.1 1 .::: :;, ... ••• pi .,.--.Ne. 4.: et4.thi .rt.en. 1 . fb. ... _ :.•te. ,sa.);•...4. Vp-I• . V''...4 •.,-,. ''" jri".44.-ns / _.,.,... " '...0.-‘ ---. %,'• '-. ••■ up ,a-i- 173.-z i 4 'c'v-C1 4 -41).• :3.i. ,. : 4. 4 • ..•'‘, il •P••••• iIlw.tt. .. :&.,#... IIP'''".•-' •• ' ..,- ■-c ` ..ri .4)._._.m,474,,,vi.e 1 7:11-. . 1„. j,:..... :, ,......., ..-- .= kir • -.4;:i- - , - ;..,.. .iw: .- :' .. L r ven1WillipiF .1. '. v;I ,,„3„_.'• '--. ..,. E..... , , . • . -.. • '5.`4- ,..'4.. - - • ''' • .;tc. •4' - .0:,I .....:,-..:. ...,. fit-Jr.-4 ... ..:- 1: . j ,,....._ .,....„1/4. ,,.. .3.w i I •4-'.., ,. J. 4 "R:.?•.:Ir ,..1 .i - ":•••• .--- -- . - '''''''....,; 3r- ••••• - ' -.P ..t..- - 4,VWittle,1 ••• :,.,.41-; 1.. ).-{ 111 . r it t2 4.f. ... C • .• ..:-,:-. I' '21C . .or ••i'r • • It ...."7-7•2•: .7' 7 'P.• ' -4044 t:•- let ''' .3 ' V.-. 1 • 7- • etie;L4421.. OIL •11464, • '. a° '••• a r-• -,:-.0.,;,.-:"..-,- R N.A.V. '4.,,:_:. ?•7, ' . ,. ..- •‘_ • ..t-1--‘..-.;=1;1r-.......___..„,„;:...40- 1___..... ._ iro:.::..-;;;;.....„,„,..,„...-.......,47.4 •...,. b ., ,? A .. VT -.'4 , . • l•TfiajL, •.........■.-..... .. -0......1144.**".Nivert 14,437114•trea•je. ; ,,•:.. .,• ". r. . , 11 . ' 1.- 0? .....--4. ,.. •-;;.,.............r-Tr=z7..;.1-.....•„‘"M,41 '• • i.,.. ZA-;,,..: ;• 1 . •: 'l Id 0 4' ,--...r•;"-:.4:-...-1-.....1117tV1.5- V.-4%._ _-'4241 '44V."1 • ---1- r---4,:---i..4.. • 4 :".1.4... .... • .. • vin_.,..•. 1- :s1 ;_. .. 0.............:,,,. .. :-...., - ,.:,._.,..4_441rettl,,A.,..„••,,__. ..1,:n.„„ . • • ..%;.-- -4". s . r :I. ''1N'- -- • it r ..-. ,.......,-. .-itA., ...,:lmakA....t.ti A , ,- ,.- ..•. : .5• ,,,„. -4„„ „.. ...-5A....s.. ..,,,,...„.... , ID•. . ..::,,,-..„ ;, . ,....•,..,-- _. ..,, ,,.. ' 1....,..-•. 2.!8.: - .9,......4,....1.1,0671,-..f..t.... k.,,...... ____,:- ..,. • - :t' a • •.% • ir " 1 '"• ^ ".A:. . ., '•::".7 -. t, ',: _inow''.',...: , 1 it liner_a •- , . ......... .rt• ' 4"••••- I ..: • -'14 „ .• Kt__ o' ' . -r j''''.t..;')".• - AA, :, fr - • . . r , ..::.".}:-'.`till . te .10178r • I .,' , - I T.,.‘,_ .. ...:, .. I.,: -0e..,r401. , • 0,.1 --. -i.v i -44, -4--atki• tut IL..... - ' . A167.4;e:7' •:4:4 j_V/er--- 4.li•#4: i ..- ez-N•4--..-4P'..eift ...* ..:.77;ta.:tit .".3z.. :f=1;,-=ir••.y 4.. - 16,, .,,,,,o. :.,„,vgvp . 7.,1,114G72.,.. , 0..., Ilk -4. --v----,3.4. - rjay. •,,t16.4.; r4 4: -.: - -00,,,, , -$1,,,?:" ,,..::1--Tr.4.:,(1.( " 1.. 4; .. 4 vfrirs.. f41--',:ie-i)f.---.4.;..g,,,it.:.-r.""pti.„" ' i. - ."--iklf,.•••,:r.:-:•ivit---' -051,f.t, .fr - 44, ; .!,-..,........w.-1,•-t -'' !:•PLI•,01 i',.' "1"" ' 718"r--Zi___.4...-. ...4...6,.. , .1 ...,, .1..., , . ,,( , ''''4P2s1, "ie '41roo tide' • - •, ..'" C?"111.44F-,-,tte ' g- •' . ,,,, " •,..:r ..r... ,,,d., -'--...„„„„,,,,,iLtAke. .c-- ,,,--, ,.... 11°,0„.2,,,,,-tolc -.t.: k TA': '-'-4-4 t••• * s 114-4- .7.'•-dr: • ;;ii,rr:4;ihrilIFJ: ' ' ig17-7.'r•-••-• 14.'''iz i.e!‘a ""°° .,-tA ''',Z-1.'.'371-•! 1. 4-126%.,kr•"''''i•t:ellt.........."...*••••■•• . ie:-..2...v14-(-op•"04.1,-.7.'''''3 7 0 P • .. Itri•1-7' --• ',%•: .,w,e. ..2.-t,-)..r.,.., . •. -.4.,z,,,-- .,- ;')'%*:1,61111": .- 71-1,11'.V,e;Str.:.:...1.' IC'•. er-u .c...441- Vr- , 9,44-01 ,Eillr,..1.4ftl■ r. 411=2,.e.44'-'•A:111 ''.• ';' :,,, , .. ,' '-'•••`,-‘,". ''-x44.._‘ z„,...,--..-4.,,,.... .1-71ifiriVt.n ,,M.--f.:':•-figv J t..„., .uk. ,....c:: ..., ,••,,. ....,.0c,-. . ....lit-4,-.`._ _ . lyivikt:9,-.,4,- :... . • .;:-.:::,11 l',,,Yi,. k !I, t,1• .,..,-" ,-; ii ‘Fo 4, .-e.z.trrY',I,'-- 4.,:i■., . . 1.01.- ydokf.,.$ t.,472 r,' 41. .-:.:'.....• , t, f:I r A.1 ,PA ' • - i• ■ .'), '• -- - '.iii .tiV- 1 -V1 !I: ',00$0,-t-45 .‘t:.,:.,-..,.,-;e:44 , , rss #.'c''.. ; .i.,„'Limitlilz .;e'..tri2,4f. • 3...r...611' .' ‘. '-'-‘7-7/- 0.--.: . 1-• •::: , . - - ,..,-,-..• ,gio..•• '0 1" • 1‘ ..- till 4.1:1 i trus,,,,,,o,,,,..;.,..-- ,rf s. ..-,..•: It.'15 ' 7•• : '4`‘ ' t' 4.f14. {1.''' . . i 420,,,,,■,, 37c 6).4. 4.41; '- -,,;4.0..: t. .• .. „,,, .. : • • , ..I.16 41-14twilA.: 7:. .• Am.; ,-ili•igifil".. • ."'2.. -''ai. rr-. ‘• .- - 11,4•',..,.--i,-...t.w...--.1.:- ,Nsio . - . . (loons sheer 49) - ----------,-, Figure 4 Washington County Soil Survey, Sheet #47 Nov-30-99 05 : 36P 20F -122 2875 P _ 10 Wetland Routine Onsite Determination Data Sheet Project Location: Tigard,south of intersection between SW 74th Avenue and Bonita Rd Field Investigator(s): Ethan Rosenthal and Jennifer Horn Plot or Pit No. 1 ApplicantlOwner: Applicant ICI Cablevision Property Owner:DHK Properties,Uc Date: 8/13/99 County: Washington State: OR Plot or pit location: Approximately 30 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 25 feet south of the forest's edge Prevailing Weather Conditions: Overcast.70 F General Site Conditions: Riparian Forest Is there noticeable disturbance of this site's native vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology? None Vegetation: Indicator Dominant Plant Species: Status Stratum %Cover 1 Acer macrophyttum FACU T •70 2 Afnus rubs FAC T 10 3 Rubus discolor FACU 5 •90 4 Rosa nutkana FAC S 2 5 Epilobium sp 2 6 Solidago Sp. H 2 7 8 9 10 •=dominant Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,andlor FACT 0% Soils: Series/Phase Ouatama loam Is the soil on the hydric soils list? YIN No Soil profile: 0-7':matrix=10 YR 3/3,no mottles. Shovel refusal at 7° Other hydric soil indicators: Hydrology: Visual observation of inundation. Y/N No Visual observation of soil saturation. YIN No Depth to saturated soli: 3.7' Depth to free standing water: >7• Drift lines. Y/N No Sediment deposits. YIN No Drainage patterns. YIN No DEA Wetland Determination: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YIN No Is the hydric soil criterion met? YIN No is the specific hydrology criterion met? YIN No Is this plant community a wetland? YIN No Comments: Based on professional opinion,the herbaceous layer was not used to determine hydrophytic vegetation. David Evans and Associates,Inc. 2828 SW Corben Avenue Portland,Oregon 97201 (503)223-6663 FAX(503)223-2701 Nov-30-99 05 : 37P 206 X22 2875 P_ 11 Wetland Routine Onsite Determination Data Sheet Project Location: Tigard,south of intersection between SW 74th Avenue and Bonita Rd. Field Investigator(s): Ethan Rosenthal and Jennifer Horn Plot or Pit No. 2 Applicant/Owner: Applicant:7CI Cablevision Property Owner.DHK Properties,Lk Date: 8114199 County: Washington State: OR Plot or pit location: Approximately 60 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 15 feet south of the forest's edge. Prevailing Weather Conditions: Overcast,70 F General Site Conditions: Riparian Forest Is there noticeable disturbance of this site's native vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology? None Vegetation: Indicator Dominant Plant Species: Status Stratum %Cover 1 Rubus discolor FACU S 4 2 Rosa nufkana FAG S 4 3 Phalaris arundinacea FACW H '90 - - — 4 Epilobium sp. — — — - 8 5 Rumex crispus FAC+ H 1 6 7 8 9 - 10 — . •=dominant Percent of dominant species that are OBL,FACW,and/or FAG? 100% Soils: Series/Phase: Quatama loam Is the soil on the hydric soils list? YIN No Soli profile: 0-10".matrix=10 YR 3/3.no mottles Other hydric soli indicators: Hydrology: Visual observation of Inundation. YIN No Visual observation of soil saturation. YIN No Depth to saturated soil: >10" Depth to free standing water: >10- Drift lines. YIN No Sediment deposits. YIN No Drainage patterns. YIN No DEA Wetland Determination: Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YIN Yes Is the hydric soli criterion met? YIN No Is the specific hydrology criterion met? YIN No Is this plant community a wetland? Y/N No Comments: Based on professional opinion,the shrub layer was not used to determine hydrophytic vegetation David Evans and Associates,Inc. 2828 SW Corbett Avenue Portland,Oregon 97201 (503)223-6663 FAX(503)223-2701 Nov-30-99 05: 31P 206 22 2875 P_06 • +. - - .. . , - 7... - a. 1 't • ~- - - ti tt ..$ • a . '• ;,..-i..;,:,.!:....•9 - Ls 7ii.+-� F � ' i`•• ._ t .ed . 1. q.• :t - . T +— .'� -:$a.. r�_ .'F-r: .. Approximate edge of 50 foot Riparian Setback Area based on City of Tigai Area proposed Water Resource Overlay to be developed (TCI easement) Border between DHK Entrance to and adjacent property DHK property \1/Lt c FRALEY / STRICKER • ARCHITECTS • A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 120 LAKESIDE AVENUE SUITE 100 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 TEL 206/324-4800 FAX 206/322-2875 FROM: Rebecca J. McCray SENT: 11/04/99 TO: Matt Scheidegger SUBJECT: Tigard/Bonita 74th Ave. Mr. Scheidegger; Per your request,here is the information regarding the placement of an OTN(Optical Transition Node) facility at 14645 SW 74th Ave. AT&T Broadband and Internet Services,formerly TCI, is currently upgrading its fiber network to support the delivery of advanced high-speed data and telephone services. The purpose of these upgrades is to ensure that secondary fiber distribution networks provide at least the same bandwidth capacity as that planned for our system coaxial transport and delivery of future advanced services. The proposed OTN facilities are part of the secondary fiber network upgrades,and consequently,we wish to place a small equipment shelter at the Dayton location identified by the architectural drawings. The equipment shelter is a manufactured concrete enclosure,which houses the network equipment. It fits a 6'x10' footprint and will sit on a 30'x40' easement. The enclosures are environmentally controlled and are equipped with air conditioning, heating, and a number of environmental alarms. The small equipment shelter is built to provide complete turnkey operation. I hope this adequately answers your request for information. If you have any further questions, please call me at(206)324-4800,or feel free to email me at rebeccam@fraley-stricker.com. Thank you, -----..#e#‘--ee'1(' *-7:------ 7/.:: ".-.7 Rebecca J. McCray Associate Project Manager Fraley/Stricker Architects 120 Lakeside Ave Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98122 Ililiiiiifiliiii !..i AT&T u. i AT&T Broadband & Internet Services >n • g • 74th-BONITA i I z GENERAL NOTES P g 4 00sOT a,wsr» ` �P 440.PL.a....o Ra. IP ow. c . ..o; ;. w• COL01410,04 TO L./.EPP PPE Pa PA 0 PPP Aro POP PO PPP,POPP•.•w+▪n.+.c'. I e""k"°r-r.'a.� PO r•ae.c.T444 ` APT°ua PPP PP T•on..La Toe ure nowen CAM•Allu PCP PPP PR a DOLL.. .o+°.�•••.NOM TO TYE PPP 47 POP 1 SEED ALL 000P0 AMY 00111.2 0,PPP DOPOART pi • Mn MO ar ROP E sOR PL P CP S/DOP S.�". O•P•MOOa w° [PUP O W�K.W 1 PT CEPRIIND 74.4,114 LOP Pos DR•CCOT.L4L4O 4404 TO 74.0 760 ..P. .+O PP* LA PTO,PO PO ri- F 4▪ WOK . .O.n •.0..xwa...�TK P R..O COO..c.a.r..c..nn '' PO d t tlf VJ air POE POPP& o Ere Tw.. 0...PIPED F..00.. PROP!PR • K •apppIS e:PA OR0 ua. :PP a. .o..wu....4vc TO p TIP SEAP.•POOR TIPOORA DOUER.n°R OP .r n ROD.Cwo•+. `wE�•• .w¢ `a MY04 .�.cr'�E a.P . C .. PI pillAP OR.�...Coaaawn w...Tr POP DEORPO r.Or • 7..017.TO IP PPP MP PPP TO PT...P.aa.w O..w AT FOLD.' Q] r PaPP 7 PR ROR•PPP.r.aC*w .. wn l�S A.004 PAPS TO w,4.W p.m TRAPPRIER PS eo.. .cT PE.wO VECT OPP�POMP*w..Ap "..�P.u...D.a`�`orLPOrar+.4ro. CPPpwn NPR..c MO,.O.OPT!Pip IP..O ROUE P CP+wc.Tw. PPP CPPw OPPA.SE Ra P PE Ptt COO+s«...4. coou...nP.maO.r.°.Eue.o.T COPPIPTP«i°C`OCan..`O'°TPRE. v...•rA .OLD«...4-PPP a.C..PO. G N Is R Yrt.p.rt"-.P...EU w.pl.{�.PrwCi P.PE PP �L��^�C W tE ALL PP PO POPP 1.4.DPP.TO T.LAP?POmw.Ors IAA 4 sr @ PIP. Far. • EY.APP WI P OS C•44,41.11.4. nCT PP..KFED.O WT ANT t 44 '".x`wPTDEPS AEEREYIATIONO VICINITY MAP a ...•.........«',,T4 r. F.,°O ;�E`OPOIT.v°" „n Q ANY ..cr+Enc+PP PPP.- . P IT Os OS PIP RP papp PL -« roOMra P..P4 En ..O AO w. P T TO c LR AT TP PP Pp 000 4pE PPM PEP PP 1 1« w+c."P`EU PPP POD'. CTO oCOAPET w..r..EwO..o« — yl I 1 # �' ` G4-FEET INDEX [ I OP 40 FALL IRE PPP!PA SP Ei I DE PPM"TO T.POPP FP .O:Dr.. « .... 7. SK PARLACTOA bps PLT Pd PR PATI 0 PR Ps.PP PO •bay NO. c*W.OS 00 IP.10 WE ..t E. rye....o P yo.... •AP DIOROPET Ill PAO 001047.T•PP.o+...n..O.....e.1•.. a.re.r n..40«n..... ... L �.�.. a. nrc..nw.D1.n.w.DETAIL. *mE arr 0 3IT T*WENS ApiE :.�t 0ROP CONTRACTOR TO 0E.tli,LOCATION 6 ALL WDEIGROl1.0 T 1 • . MAMMAL u POMP To uTIL ITIE!17'011•0 TO CONlTgICTICN 740 DOER 6 DRUO[D.14E•w cwT.w tPMRmT F..4. RELOCATE 46 REWREO. rw...T..�a'OV..`..�Fe..en0 TO pap.P...Q.P.R. ICE O..EETlI • �a� \\\ \\\ E '111.:'!,',1' g 1 LEXISTING \'\ pt DRIVEWAY Cp"7 :473 p \ 0-� o\ ''\.\ P § »+� L r..r.roe u°� 1 R �. .—..—.—.—,—.1 —.— _ . EAbEMENT rooalFw. I II ARRA aa i \ AREA I u _ -• fl' 1 dI warm. • �r! p II 8 ! I CY.. i }=1, II t � ,i 7.4.-ram.,,.. 1� � I ii i /5„. O 1 I Q 5 2 1 NoiES- ROMSr ^, I VERIFY EXISTIN[.•ENCE REOUIRET.ENi a. 1 I.L4rOUT IS DET4I,LED AT e Al ©SITE PLAN 0T4 PRGPERTY O NER DRdWI NO.v41 �Er�vEMENT PLAN a D lo. wEETal !Q!;;;:iQ3Q31 pp 10'•0.TIRCAL PANEL E'-O'CLEAR GATE OPEWYa / S'-0' / QQ6iitF 14,tpp! ry, E / SLID•IG WR PER.15t SPECPICATIp,S Ti-it-I. ,„„S..GRAVEL a'TO c'o 5i0'...a �Tp•ROL a 1 �1((�1QECE9SjGF a1lrltai•' 1 CLEA"CASED4GCX,402NES Ia1 ) Iiiliihola 3 I nN Tau Ex 1 ExIST aesoEi �!a xort /SLOP$ exror GRADE L.:L"• i°�,:y w''S�D.�Y�+�.�: ,+•7w;•'� I i 'A.,'.,ti' o.,o.•.. .o .v,,.,, ;?;y+SyS,Syy '4444:::::�-ry.. ,. .c < ! }A}'.a1<A$'v 3Z::j; :Sk '� ��°., .:44+:*...ie+ h �'•r,5,;5 r�e �.y •'y< : \jti=.� - <- 7•7-.4.•..�_, _:,.yam O' y;: °X.:4 :.* .}:Oi�%;, v.,,,S�;•:••••••.• •y .;s'°gr... ti�:•'v.v.. �,° •..ti LI. /7 .� j1 ( \/ VI 'w V . 4'a8 y,. •' y.;❖•,..... _Y?ro 'sr',• ..S ••..{.•.v• r,r•'s .°i$ , 1 Y , dti ti o°� °'r,'� ��ti••• +v`+ F;7�, ti...v oI•ti. \.♦ R .V•$..."baw St •..•. fi ' I:4 .: ••,,.•w.'.•.S b.;V:•..,,,,,'r 1 exuvAn nN"ECesSe'E+To E . I.4 ❖•. .1 si'••. !..ICAVAV ove. ;Bee.o. :e A :we...'Vv. y e;�.. GR0 PROPOSED ROAD BED :': :0:•:•:•.C•`••:24..: ::::•:.Vtir• ✓::.•::.::ti:V•.:Y.:::::.•�S•M1S'O.:ON'$:::::::::•:'.•: ti useLES°°ol4°r5 AND s L 2$",s;yS? �c;}r •• ,; ,I°4y" b .� ti O,�l.°�b.ti is�v3 " :ti: c RDA a USE APPROVED•ILL uJ.ERE _ •S=Lip '=t.--! i'Ew*a V.V. REQUIRED 70 GRAD ROAD AS y /// �. -a,.. NDIGATED.CPTACt SUGRADE -,r, //�/ice/%//////%/////%�% •••�i��%//%�iJ//// /////%��j%�j Y ��j�%/' , /iv. el 0 . NOTtB I AOR EDO + SITE aRSDw MISS SERE 3eDESSRAR.DUE r0 SOL CORDITONS.PROVIDE e•nN 1-Vl TIROS CO.RCTED CIRJMIED POCK BASE OVER - WIRE IQN10R LL _ COITACTED S000EADC • WIRE IA RELD C14N LINK,ASPIC I2'DIAL FCbrW(� I W Ii+�11 S ECS-EV VNTL •LK POST SLATS-VERP+ N CLLCR YI/OVER ETAIL: GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ' "He▪ a1 o BO Z 5•�•H'•r•r PRISM GRADE Lk NOTII6 I: 2 GAR ROW AND CANER POST.1-Ve'OD.MPE.50420 eD ASTn-.1001 3.LK POSA:1.181'OD..SC/ CAW SO ASM 21061 I 51 PO-ER 3.GAR.R6M 150'OD.SCALD b ASm-2,001 •T• 1 e PEDESTAL ;�-_i a.ice APO BRACE RAIL.114 OD PIPE.!GRID 00 65111-2001 • 1 I ` cGoD�n S.P4880.s C.A.COIF unee Sim r rEs.'AORIC tO%GGC,GRAVEL BASE i�'��,•�L R • mg; "S,G �� SCSCOK LKe 6.TIE WEE:nNrU1 N GA.GALVA2I0D STEEL I ,1. 4<fie. .L-JIM GRADE MI_-1 00000 Q p v5 a is G1 5 y? ' CQ-QAINLINK PENCE CHAINLIN< FENCE/GATE ELEVATION u SECTION `$ L FRONT RIG T CCM ©•I•..A.w.•r ®AGMA1.Sr•r.r - • IS VI 8 AIR QQQQQ ■Q2E 0001 000 1 I SI•RIR-ASSyRD GAL, f'i' ill 1 eg J uDU' LAS // l ^J GRADE GRADE - -_---_- RECESSED wAIapLE LE* / 1 S S 19 9 ' LPiNG GLENS i--SLRFACE RESTORATIO.I 1W ....•> g J /./�9' \\/\/\/\/\:�\�//\y BA,GKFILL COVER..Oia.l]]P /EAT ya9IA LOT 4•eERT 1•a BACK L LEBT GLOM ,\\ j \�\� ��\�\ ulo Les n ■ O B TYPICAL ELEVATIONS: C.U.E. 4 \▪ \/ //// � `r0,,;,`.,,"°L,it.LE e 31650L5 D 111 `/ d %%%\/\'_A PLGWE R166,300�J Q / / / / I,, GALV Gu.wIEL • 51 1 t Y `\,'/'\ E 1�' 1 SIDE. F 0 ``\ \ - O••.-•t'�A / a'•PyG Uli INTERDUGT F 7 /!\/ a EAti.SIDE.a�. ISO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIRI ::: r \ \ "\S/\ \\ \ �� n-DULPT s< �/j\�i\\///\`�/ i �� IEAG.SIDE.1 - ` I I Z R GRADE ��v� \\�\\ .v ,v.\ rRw PVC F•aI.ER co•vIJIT / I% �T Q &i,,,.<%�� i P..A`cam.!DOSE FLOC*O KNO KOUT �. \ %ii�� M1 » Y^ SRpSr 5� FIELD VIM,0 l L26 T TIE VYIr. / S/ ftz.2 1-4 . \ •ERif FP.. v E°aG.E•+o Elw�"s „�••..a V.?....`%i. EVE LOCAi Kr. on.a. 1 1'�"�" ,<�<\�n �n�\ �T.�1la n I Nr CRSNED GRATE..SILL QTY VAST 64{'{„A ` A2A N'COetSE GRAVEL FILL �b SECTION: C.0 . l ETAIL: TYPICAL TRENCH i DETAIL: 644-LA VAULT WI GROUND ROD ..., �SOal•r.r� ®•ry I OS S..EETS I - 1lrgi,1`II,1 R '` �1�i,6�1 iii{a TO SERVICE I v ENTRANCE EOJS LENT P 6/E1 D GOWN X ., SEE Ahi I a DARE•410 COPPER I COPPER DELOW •01ER POLE I ' GRACE TYP) V / O /111�1��<•COO CTO II 10'.3(a•ROD(Tl'PI Si OONTRACToB I I�Itt�i�ND4 I a I K4 ENTRANCE ONRIAL 17LPIN i I P lP RIM RAN I ALOSIR EAElPlM • Il ME 5//52./ I g 1 1 J I R•n..CIA. ' i- WD I -I- 00.- IMII -- i I! I WEO.IO LEVEL EASEnEN'DPNDARi I I .Tn r1i"I1 ", 1I l I II NOTE6 NOTES I i I I i I g L5 OUTS RODS NEAR DLDG CORERS.TN 3'MGR OCA.POLER COPANT TO PROVIDE TN&RR'IINATKN SLOG STR.JCS.RE CS=NWT MID COIDCTOR TE4TNATIO•6 AT Writ 1 TT I • TT nGROUNDING PLAN ---. CONDUIT AT POWER POLE I (�+ G------ jI I i I CONCRETE WIKRNAL 1 1 g I I ENGLON4 ICLIJ �.IF. 11 I nAwAL d rI TRANSFER PANE: I W pEGROWDNGI SWITCH u C— R.'.CONCRETE - Sr, 1 - o-� i t ACCESS POW W'SID /---- aRE CONDUCTOR I SAM/ ° F., ? -'=1- ._�n I- EK I i .. �� II 3 ∎ 1. II _J� I1=11=1II • / I r.rvc-r3,•3im _—--—-__:II r ° "11;II11111.i411 ara 1. 11111 _ L__�__'��__—_ I t 11-'IF R,`-_ '- I C METER•METER SOCKET '7 .11-_:11=-111 1 II E� �C•I 2 —1R �=1 �iql -1 11- r.crvvm _ IIF'11-11'LL I Tn..; I— I� s T 1' n �IfT' SERVICE DISCONNECT CI ZELECTRICAL PLAN P r� 1ET1_T�r_ EA4•..E. i BANE F I ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS ELECTRICAL FLAG NOTES • ]'.G-•3„!/0 PLA6•NOTE sow R[Nea v T.e ROAD.055.5.455 COO, COO••DNATE WT.LOC+L i]• •a-RN,YRU0IRTEA RJR P45P24 OEPTU.EJ•4TN6 5504[57 POLE nTS G Para RO.D IS T.ro+rtE ]a0/R0v .1. ]■0A]0v.1. 5E RATED a OR 0' AGED D1E[PNECT WPC., 55ROvTJ[0 RV O CO.,r TK IY%ER POLL 5540+10[»RET o COVED j 3W.)eDA 600uCTOR 5540.0E TE•TgA n.4AN xAL AT TOP C•O�Np, COPD55MTE E 6G1 6GI OR ❑ __ LOCAL ELECTRK COr••i POR 557 I TERIN.TpL -f—_ �'ROD R 5.10,5,50 O NW PETER L TEST 64050 P40T MERIOS pN.MOT ISE LESS Tu.f OW TO ET • II COMACT ENGNER RJR PROPER 6 IE TEST 55550CEpaQ.•RET wERLLTR nAraA MNPS MR41.7.64[..44 sus 5 OM4.MOT Si LN65E[w ROw WETYE'JI N 55r ))P 0N0v I.3W ® r4C[MAOLE SOU-EY.6401[0 40G. RATED OE E w I so• V, —O � 0w OsR;55,NCF ubn oo• NOR 06!1 64025.07 TEST WE:L RE DRED 4x0 PIED KRIPY LOCATION 6— 6w•ND55• 0.4525505504.5•0 ACEE R RR • /^p,_GROUNDING ROD DETAIL ONE LINE DIAGRAM ' "'�'IT'I"MM6i� V 10, 5•••E E-51 LL44 _ _ I , CON, - ZETE UNIVERSAL -E NCLOS RE Description The Concrete Universal Enclosure (CUE) is the most recent addition to RELTEC's Universal Enclosure line of walk-in cabinets. Constructed entirely of 5000 PSI concrete, the CUE is ideal for those applications that may require additional security. Like our metallic UEs, the CUE provides a versatile and economic deployment vehicle for plant electronic applications. This front access, walk-in cabinet is environmentally controlled to protect electronic equipment and batteries from severe weather conditions. A ° 12,000 BTU air conditioner with integrated a sump pump, and an alarm package that includes intrusion, high water, smoke and explosive gas alarms, are standard to ensure safe operation and security. As an option, an 18,000 BTU or an additional 12,000 BTU air conditioner <.r' can be installed for extra cooling capacity. The CUE also is equipped with a RELTEC 100Amp CUE610TV JuiceBox, which contains an AC load center, 100Amp generator receptacle and power transfer switch that are used in the event of an extended control panel, a DC vent, an economizer feature commercial power outage. As an option, the for the air conditioner, an externally mounted JuiceBox can also be equipped with a commercial cross-connect and alarms for low temperature and power meter housing. humidity. Additional standard features include a cable The CUE accommodates six full 7-ft. x 23-in. rearrangement facility that provides craft equipment racks, with additional wall space for separation of electronics and OSP cable splicing, miscellaneous equipment such as protection Unistrut construction, an entrance ladder, a keyed blocks. The CUE is compatible with most digital entry doorway, a ventilation system, a 1/0 ground loop carrier(DLC), cellular and CATV systems. system, convenience outlets and overhead cable For DLC applications, the CUE will accommodate racks. Optional features include an environmental in excess of 2600 derived pairs. Features & • Environmentally controlled—cabinet is • Complete turnkey capability—configuration Benefits equipped with air conditioning, heating and a full services as well as full EF&I (Engineer, Furnish complement of environmental alarms and install)are available • Cabinet meets Bellcore TR-TSY-000487 and • All concrete construction—provides improved Military Spec. 810E—to exceed most security and equipment protection application requirements • Modular cooling—air conditioner flexibility • High capacity—has more capacity than most provides cost effective cooling for a wide range walk-ins with a DLC capacity of over 2600 of applications derived pairs • Compact, single door design—requires less • Low profile design—accommodates 7-ft. relay right-of-way space than many cabinets and racks, although the unit stands less than 6 feet huts, and, in most cases, no building permit is above ground required(check with local authorities to determine local building permit requirements) • No foundation required—easier to install RELTEC RFP-13-69 CUED 1 OTV CONCRETE UNIVERSAL ENCLOSURE Application The CUE is designed specifically for housing remote electronics used by the telecommunications industry. Applications include copper and fiber-fed DLC, cellular sites and CAN headends. AC System • 100 Amp single phase AC load center, 60 Hz. • 48 VDC Toxic/explosive gas detector • 120/240 volt single phase AC transfer switch • One 110VAC GFI convenience quad outlet with emergency inlet • One AC surge arrester • 100 Amp AC 12 position load center • 12-hour timer switch for internal lighting • #1/0 AWG ground system • One double 40 watt fluorescent light fixture Environmental STANDARD OPTIONAL System • One sump pump, 1/3HP • Additional 12,000 BTU/HR air conditioner • Vent system activated by the light time switch • One upgrade vent system package (option, • One 12,000 BTU/HR air conditioner with 2.2K includes the remote gas alarm) watt heater Alarm STANDARD OPTIONAL System • Door intrusion remote alarm • Humidity remote alarm • High temperature remote alarm • Low temperature alarm • High water remote alarm • 48 or 24 VDC • Emergency lights (60 minute battery reserve limit) • Toxic and explosive gas alarms, audible and remote • Rectifier remote alarm • Inverter failure remote alarm • Fuse visual and remote alarm • AC power failure alarm • R66M punch down block • Smoke detector(self-contained single station) audible and remote alarm RFP-13-70 I Carrier Equipment Layout MIMI Z ga I I I I a.• {- cs'1iR s► I I I I �.. trot. JUICER Ia tr...Not 1 I Ir.I./.4 0 Aft YV 7INNICII 1 t 1 t 10 1r..1I..« I I re sir mot 0 1 O pre a1,.Irol I I tr WM MCI 0 I I t I I I t I WC OS I I I I I I I I 1b•M Is I I I I I I i I M``'%r•—•-•IL S--] E.,........T E.7.7 E17.7 1.47 ...• L►---ii. a.• 6•-..-----.G.• I•.1 0101 II:9.4.r CUE610TV CAN Floor Plan (typ.) RFP-1 3-71 CUE6 1 OTV CONCRETE UNIVERSAL ENCLOSURE Ordering The Concrete Universal Enclosure can be ordered for special requirements or configurations. Contact Information RELTEC customer service at (630) 579-5000 and ask for a BEC engineer. � �� b , ' _ 146"4-11/4 ∎ - 4p,V 4 rte , r . ..- ---1 .,... 1:2_1 _ g _ 4.A R , M it��ii • !. i..;.... ,.: ' ',-,_: ..:1-,. .mss- try 7"a-- , -_ •.._ ,c ,,,z.,:,,,-,4:-.._-.. -- CUE610TV CUE610TV Installation (Back Shown) (Front Shown) RELTEC/4350 Weaver Parkway/Warrenvilte, Illinois 60555/(630)579-5000/FAX(630) 579-5050 www.relteccorp.com • RE, LT EC ©1998 RELTEC Corporation Printed in the U.S.A. �...... RFP-13-72 'P, {., °vt'•;•.a ,w .. �� •''s .en - , F°� ' '✓ i°Ne#t, ♦'a'a. k?., 0Z �. �� '} eYi' ' .C [! - r L^Y .}a11�x -" ', `* < '� 'K.#�=• ��L% ..,•� a ,N � � + £ Fd i , ,. 3 (1 ,„ �:..i ,��. x �t s ' ;fir ' : . x N _ E ''Ni t• a-' t` rii� `V, . }t � x f < . -0j ` t A, {.:4 Eti,3 i� \ R r Y ; °rS . s d ffi .,....... sr+a� rya, e � ; ^ ' i,, . _ t , P 4* . $ ' �f-.•:. a,A ml,3 4N.,r -.- 6 F :.. � T,, t t e ' . r / n. ;t , ' t 1 t. ,',"'� w.✓'tit },,gs A / s i z. A / ' 4,1 f/��irl/: ��!°o.�V.P. ifi jj��i//� Y + + .s. �... r �r "� "�y� a ! J r t I•f4!./.� ! r i ♦ "4► yr» ', " ' ^3 'd 4. �+lri �� f ��j ..e7., 1.4e,4”, /..4 s� -.; ,%/l.;Ir::o ..":04,. -. . ,' ;!e�1///� �j.y/! *i//7r/�`Y. / .-`,�' ='}mow:. 1 ;''�� '� F/'/ : ✓ / i,,„ice'.»,e 0 � '4, s Tr"4.-4'' ",f,1*' }`�* ;'' "fir >.=4:4.., ,. ' * YY J .� a.� / .J _ r", , -I —R '..s;a �' �'�°',,,*'3 ,a, ,,>,I %rlf�• .,' rd l{t . i .l• ,40'•„ % `a t•' r '.,.. Y,", i t •/ 4 i` +1"4. '?. ,t 4' R �e`2'iii'4',�It"t • r i � � i _ ww` "f` F� f.r j`+,f/ ;f i �, .j 4 ,«!4 �Y y'.....„ 4,- . , r , . , ii,„_, ,..,- ;, , , . ...... . , , ,„.,... ,...J.......„___,.. . „..... .,,,i, ,....,,,,,....4:,•-......„. r.,..,.........mos.,-,- ---• ,, �-'r��"+�tra� � - 7t . f'r rI°,l�S�,� ,,k17117.70'.-,---'',,40�. six, . ♦�,_ .. t.'-c.-...v. •�i 4s� � 0� � ,. , ...ws..,.,..,..... < ,. '` +..... «. ,%i�i. 'g s,i:;•J„�,� ,a ,' .& rf ''"x. p ',} ,.*'i� ,'. iY� t ,' '{ y ..lf --►++....mow.. , P • �.,.. �'/✓ r . c { X s ri f♦ ' F < s .:: i..t' .••s#+..•. .,k a 7 `" , S ' ttia.r t?: w ' r ft' in R I _12 _ ct` y -'� �� .r,�.m..,.. E a -'-';? r '` .. ♦ .,✓ +a ,,t°., ,, alt. J 11 a... II i i 1 e±s'e tl�+t � °r' °► , ,, i� '& „it i^;^e } aft t it �,....- a'f't, ...am ' t' ° ... • ti.t, ••• fy-, i a� `III t-,..... , 5 ai 14 1 `^^° a .\1/4%,‘ '. te r , t;•ttt� I M ) *aasg r #s 33s — e l',.. Ft'x 8 ..y fl '� s .-- ,' -» ssi Y • ,....,.. . . 4 . (J - � I iYN a r! +.. r.V , x.'ar 1` is t a$ ..:II t., t' .NEM. a r f _ r ,41�_ � _ IA 1 w F — r • ;' i r is r i,� ,.., ._. ._. .. _ ... �y _ • f' rr tt r d, .0 Ar :.'r i I dIt Hrt.Jit�a i ��i ;� 4 .t i �- Ir a F�zst ;ittr2♦5.7: - 1 _ is ° # 1 ��; ..-- ...� in 0 Figure 1: Site Map (Base map acquired from City of Tigard GIS web site) I VI __ in I— 1 _ 1 .../ r■ it 4 to --,,, f N BONITA RD N I tv k I P N I colgliT,° ,00 illai ova . I * of . • 4 V* DHK propeny a 441 C 04" • '. 0 ' ° I *44 lia I * Ion 011#1.11.1P $ IR.lie Ili id * 1181P•II . Si I lid ' - # I 1 D : Bkliali "II I . I 1 4 k Wetlands and Riparian Setback i 101 t 14 t as Mapped by City of Tigard Water t■ P Resources Overlay a j . z; ,7 L II 'or on•Imon Webands ii. I Tigard Riparian Setback a. --t, _.:. . .. .- ;•t• i-I sval f. 1 USA Water Quality Buffer I I City of Tigard o 4 a) lb I t i 1 L I ..... ..4) .-2 IP I o I 1 1116 ei ats 'ki 1,. ;.: 1 ..... . . Northern boundary of Riparian mill...„ m 1 , I "le br a, '": .': • F Setback based on DEA findings N I 0 Z Nov-30-99 05: 29P 20F 322 2875 P-02 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. October 6, 1999 �5 SK Corhett Avenue Pcori:and, Oregnri 9720i AranT M ;u4.223.666 City of Tigard Address ;�3.2• 2701 Address REFERENCE: DHK PROPERTIES LLC. SW 74TH AVENUE WETLAND DETERMINATION FOR TCI CABLE UTILITY VAULT SITE DEA PROJECT NO. TCIW0006 (37) To Whom It May Concern: This memorandum summarizes the results of an on-site wetland determination prepared by David Evans and Associates. Inc. (DEA) for a property owned by DHK Associates and Properties, located at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. On behalf of TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc. (TCI), DEA investigated this site to determine whether jurisdictional wetlands occur on-site or on the property immediately adjacent to the subject property to the south within 50 feet of a utility vault proposed to be constructed by TCI on the southeastern corner of the subject property. Although the City of Tigard's Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) identifies wetlands in this area, no jurisdictional wetlands were found within the study area of this investigation. (See Figure 1: Site Map). METHODS The wetlands investigation consisted of(I)a review of the US Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map for the subject area (Beaverton Quadrangle)and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington County Soil Survey (Sheet 447) to locate possible mapped on-site wetlands and hydric soils. (2)a field inventory of general site conditions, and (3) an analysis of this data. The site visit was conducted on August 13, 1999. The project site was walked and sample plots established to confirm the presence or absence of jurisdictional wetlands using the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). General site conditions and observations of vegetation, soil, and hydrologic conditions were noted. The wetland delineation manual states that wetlands possess three essential characteristics: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and hydrology specific to wetlands. The area was investigated for the concurrent presence of each of these parameters. SITE DESCRIPTION The DHK property currently consists of a paved lot with no buildings or similar structures(see Figure 2: Site Photo). The southern boundary of the property is bordered by several trees—Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menaiesii), crabapple (Pyrus fusca), Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia), and red alder(Anus rubra). This border is approximately three feet wide and runs the length of the southern boundary with the exception of a vegetated area approximately 15 x 15 feet abutting 74th Avenue. Douglas fir and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor)were noted in this vegetated area, in addition to a utility pole and fire hydrant. The lot directly adjacent and to the south of the DHK property is undeveloped and partially covered with piles of dirt and asphalt. Both properties are bounded by 74th Avenue on the east. UuntnndinX ProresNwnuis . . . (lutstauding Qur,Iity' a«••��""�'• °• • Nov-30-99 05: 30P 20F 322 2875 P .03 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is located to the south of the proposed project site. Ball Creek is a tributary of Fanno Creek and is located in the Tualatin River watershed. The existing incised channel indicates that Ball Creek has been disconnected from its flood plain through this section of its reach. Ball Creek enters the forested area through a five-foot culvert that runs underneath 74th Avenue. The creek is approximately eight feet deep from the bottom of the channel to the top of the bank and is fifteen feet wide from bank to bank. Historically this riparian forest may have been located within the creek's active flood plain. DETERMINATION FINDINGS The NWI does not indicate wetlands on the DHK property; however, a palustrine forested wetland is mapped for the area associated with Bail Creek (see Figure 3: National Wetlands Inventory). The mapped soil series is Quatama loam,0 to 3 percent slopes (see Figure 4: Washington County Soil Survey). This moderately well-drained soil is found on old terraces. Quatama loam is not considered a hydric soil within Washington County. Cove clay is also mapped within the vicinity of Ball Creek. Cove clay is considered a hydric soil within Washington County. No jurisdictional wetlands were found within the study area of this investigation. This finding covers the DHK property and the adjacent property to the south, including the portion of riparian forest located on the north side of Ball Creek. Please note that this investigation did not look at the western boundary of these properties as no construction is planned to take place within well over 50 feet of the boundary. Two sampling plots were established within the forested area. The results are discussed below. Plot l is located approximately 30 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 25 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the KNHS property. The plant community is dominated by bigleaf maple (Ater macrophyllum. FACU) and Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor, FACU). Red alder (Alnus rubru, FAC) was also found. The soil is a dark brown(10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles or redoximorphic features. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. It is unlikely that the area surrounding plot 1 would be considered an active flood plain (i.e. flooded by 2 year flood event) of Ball Creek. Plot 2 was located approximately 60 feet west of the edge of 74th Avenue and 15 feet south of the break between bare ground and the forested area on the KNHS property. The plant community is dominated by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). Other species found were Watson's willow weed (Epilobium watsonii), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), and Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana. FAC). Several well established Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia, FACW) were found outside of the plot area. The soil in plot 2 is also a dark brown (10 YR 3/3) loam containing no mottles. Redoximorphic features,although few and very faint, were present. No signs of wetland hydrology were found. Plot 2 is approximately 1 foot lower in elevation relative to plot 1. However, it is still significantly higher than the creek bed and is unlikely to flood during 2 year flood events. REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS According to the City of Tigard Community Development Code (Section —18.797.010), Ball Creek is classified as a"Major" stream with an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second. The `'riparian setback area" for major streams is 50 feet and is measured from top-of-bank or the edge of an associated wetland. (.) i tunil;ng 1'n.j.cctnmalt Oi ta.;.iny; Outility Nov-30-99 05: 30P 20" 322 2875 Pc - P.04 c (15,) DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RECOMMENDATIONS As described in the findings section of this report, it was determined that the riparian forest associated with Ball Creek is not a jurisdictional wetland. Therefore, it is recommended that the riparian setback area be established from the top-of-bank along Ball Creek. This will place the outer boundary of the setback area within the unvegetated portion of the adjacent property and more than 50 feet from the proposed location of the TCI utility vault. This boundary is different from the City's Water Resources overlay, which places the boundary within the DHK property (see Figure 1: site map). If you have any questions regarding the findings of this report, please feel free to call me at(503)499-0572. ,VOTE: Findings of DEA's investigation will be based on the site information collected at the time of our study; our understanding of the 1987 Corps of Engineers(ACOE) Wetlands Delineation Manual;and our understanding of federal, state, and local regulations governing wetlands. These regulations, delineation methodologies, and wetlands themselves may change over time. A DEA Natural Resources wetland determination memorandum is not to be used as a fully documented wetland delineation report to the environmental regulatory agencies that exert jurisdiction over wetlands. The method employed for this wetland reconnaissance is not intended to produce a map showing exact wetland locations and boundaries. A wetland determination provides only generalized and approximate information based on a brief site investigation. Approximate wetland location and extent are subject to change based on a detailed and more thorough site investigation and professional land survey. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ethan Rosenthal Natural Resource Specialist S:1NATuRAL`.iJR0\TCI W0006:wTLDRPT i.DOC EJRO:SFJ <?(innrn J:ng Yrote to tai, t>at.tandi C± (:unity in 0 a Figure 1: Site Map (Base map acquired from City of Tigard GIS web site) - r- ..J .} b I BONITA RD N N 1 N 1 /1"1, I ilf 1 doily , DHK property r I *441 I I #III 0 di liffici lill=411. t • q 11 G: ■ 1 1 ' -8, , .,i # I I0 t * Wetlands and Riparian Setback Y 4 k , as Mapped by City of Tigard Water el ". i Resources Overlay • ,i L r ---- Wetlands I �' y �,: '` I Tigard Riparian Setback a �---- w USA Water Quality Buffer "' 1 City of Tigard o 1 al $ - it ` `" k' I ... ,r m, Northern boundary of Riparian o �i"- - n,., `^ Setback based on DEA findings • Ilk \ I 0 Z Nov-30-99 05: 31P 20' 322 2875 P _06 • • - ; r r. - • : t; -- 4 s w-._ .•Nutt;,t•'.7.2 -* • li.-a► ° 'i.= -Nog rte. t' ° •'• • r r!t, i, - . s•. eK ` ,. t---1._ i t.•ig Y `?1. ..G 11+4+ I 1•:'.:,,.;:W.; :%' ..k.l:•'�+ • • Approximate edge of 50 foot Riparian Setback Area based on City of Tigard Area proposed Water Resource Overlay to be developed (TCI easement) Border between DHK Entrance to and adjacent property DHK property Nov-30-99 05:31P 20F 122 2875 P.07 Figure 2: Site Photo .•'ice. �� .+1 .�— .4... •'�.' •ti�. . s • :•• - ' - . " •i.. 4. •:3 %. ,`-. ^..i - •.. .. � . f: :• _• -. . - '�:, .eer - —• .s.4,- _ �Z� w j ~_.fi`-.1-.4,3 • � _ i +it 3--,'�� Tr r.. Property adjacent to DHK property Edge of riparian forest associated with Ball Creek Approximate edge of 50 foot Riparian Setback Area based on DEA findings Nr,v 30 99 05 : 31 1' 20E -122 2875 P _ 06 1.• 1,' •.• • - - • • : •r`1 .• • om . -- . ., r=�• : .ti �� _.� i .. ,—: ..‘.... - 410. .. •• • - _.a 1- , S 1-,L• L :A.. - • •.' • `• �• • - . '+•+. ....0.-^fP�� . - T °,� • - .• - '1 "'•r..•�'� ;%.?t ! -�J�i4�: f .i:■.: Off :.��:.: 1 .,� .- f.(..r,... -'..1( . .+5°.4.-1--:;•%. .r ' .•I:+was `s..iifi.':_•Yi-.'- .f:'..... .:::k'' '►. • Approximate edge of 50 foot Riparian Setback Area based on City of Tigai Area proposed Water Resource Overlay to be developed (TCI easement) Border between DHK Entrance to and adjacent property DHK property Nov-30-99 05 : 31P 20F 122 2875 P.07 Figure 2: Site Photo 't' ..10.4c.;;1.. '',-.- 71.47 a.- 4 •.• -.4. . • ■•, -;jx..v •■• ; A''',..-4••"'' ..Z.* * ' '1•41:.ft J4II a:;16- ; - go- • - '•• arP. --311:1 1.1"lit4t.. . :-. "...';' 4., x t!I, , . .. i -..... : : • - . -.;4 ..V.T: -..- ' - - •,:''-e-"," •- . .. -84 •' - ---it . - '• ..t. 4', -- • .r.• - . ,0 • • ./.... 'I• •••• ' ....... -....-- .. - • ..7.4. • •• iaL- . ' 1::Ar.a• ^'4' .%.:,) ''.- - II irk 7 _ . - • It- .: - ... • :-• • •ip • . - -..r.-:•.,:' : 7 , 4......"---,41 f• •.r. .. -- r : •.. it.... ,,, .....",..... % J• jed11.4•... . • . ... . e C."11 -•.'••...-- • • 4. --- .. F •• • •- • it - -.'"' • .. - - . f. - • 11 '• ''''.. . . • . . - •••• ' i . 440011; - • .., • . .. „_ ....,,,,e •41111111 11r—_ -1/4- .77 -'"" ..". -4r .ii'sft- . 42■....— -7.-4 -,•...,,;-4.4■.-..i,vs,.:-...-wr,1/21) L _.....,41......... „. . _ ...... ,...4.. _ • _ .:___.:... ...:.- ....___...re. ,... . _,...,;tr.........:... :„.t.z.. ............,_: ........„:_,..z..,.._..:...... . .._ ‘...;...„,....,..... .„..,....1_,... .... 1 .. ...... ......... Ir -''''.....7111tk7'..:Alleh e.g. . ."'. .......■.• , ...,..15.- ''.."-...'-'-'''' ' - "....' ..." t jr... ..."......Yll"1.4.01"'T210*-.• 7."7“::''':*:•.P.0010."--a....' '''........."A • • :;•■•1.:•.‘ '' ::. .., ...Ala,.....'41‘.....7. ' ..-*A... ,,:mS. ,- s'''1...'%. . .•77 ..fill•,.., Is• ....I. ''..." •".-.......aS;).4 .• ..a....... • • ' • I . .--........ - ,5a: ..',•att .--A. 2. r, - -- -- , • Property adjacent to DHK property Edge of riparian forest associated with Ball Creek Approximate edge of 50 foot Riparian Setback Area based on DEA findings Nov-30-99 05 :: 29P 20(' 122 2875 P . 01 Fraley/Stricker 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, Wa 98122 Faxl 206-322-2875 Architects 206-3244800 Fax2 206-328-9499 Date: \ /50^c"\--\. Time: 1—is. Total pages faxed: X It Ter Fax: 475C)- — tp<al--1 From: ks----\c_CArom Project: 1 -- ava/ 60-1:k A, F/SA Job#: 5c1 Regarding: -k• Attached: clnok Copies to: If total number of pages are not received or are illegible, please call 206-324-4800. A . it 7 — :p __. _ ::„. li:-1:"'''100'lliit'..*"•:.., i L 1 , t • ' 11:1 I 1 . , , ,:iit, i....., , .. '''.;: Aar.:a f - 4 R10.--,G TAE I$JIII1I1'LEIF- OF NIG H-� EEp BRONCO BU CKI NG _ ..., Forget about faster CPUs, 4 4ACCESS swifter memory buses,and speedier --; '�i , 3D acceleration. High-speed Internet access—a.k.a. "broadband"—is the most ? ` ' .' ti,significant technological advancement to serve PC fanatics in 1999. As far as relative performance boosts go,the jump from 56Kbps to '• s 10Mbps bandwidth is exponentially more impressive than the jump from Pentium , ' to Pentium II,or Virge to Voodoo. In a nutshell, broadband will change your life—so get it immediately and by any means necessary. Indeed,the first time you download an r• 8MB MP3 file in less than 60 seconds,your eyes will light up,you'll crack a goofy smile, ..and you'll ask yourself how you ever coped with your old lame-ass V.90 modem. This broadband buyer's guide covers the three major technologies currently rolling out nation- Ovh wide DSL,satellite,and cable. Each has its good and bad points,so it's time to become well-versed f - in which high-speed standard is best for you. DSL uses standard phone lines to offer high speed by Bryan Del Ritz I , access,but is hampered by slow rollouts, limited availabil- '° +� ,ry ty,and your relative proximity to your phone company's ' tom"1 central office.Satellite technology sounds cool—who wouldn't want to send data packets through r outer space?—but you'll still use your butt-slow traditional modem to send upstream data.Cable, meanwhile,is potentially faster and more readily available than DSL,but sharing a cable line with d' neighbors raises security issues we haven't considered since the demise of the telephone party line.v To help you pick the be broadband plan,we've dished up handy,bite-sized nuggets on each technology—how it works,how fast it runs, how much it costs,and how to get it.We Z, even walk you through a typical installation,so you'll know what to expect after that W a broadband service truck pulls up in front of your house. If that weren't enough,we z list cool tips,tricks,and caveats to consider when shopping for service. Finally,we z Z reveal the speed of real-world file transfers—we benchmarked each technology o < Y with the same four content-transfer tests,then compared them to the Z speed of traditional 56K service. °- 0 x fl What are you waiting for?Broadband will reinvent the Y c x way you use your PC.So get online—get really $ online—today. i 46 , 47 ! is being served. Be forewarned:You should l; ;START', • double- and triple-check before you take ' GOBLE no for an answer.When we called to have •' Recent studies show that more than 70%of @Home service installed in Dublin, CA,we 10 Mbps� °` r:= U.S.households are wired for cable TV.If were told twice that service was not yet r ,r ••_ you're part of this status quo,chances are available in our area, even though it was. � r i) good that you'll be able to buck the broadband -I .'r .03 s g y Also,if you've just moved into a newly built ° .: =: ::_ bronco atop the very same coaxial cable that ` ame P rY community, let the cable company know ." carries"X-Files"reruns to.your tube.There are exactly where your new street is located. If a °• @n%ed ti'',C 11.*, mom currently two major players in the cable arena: I�otn the customer service reps are using older LOCAL Time Warner/Media One's Road Runner service, maps, your new address may not exist in NAP HEAD-ENDS { i-� and AT&T/ICI's @Home service,which was their database.So,even though service can p 3; .. : available to us for local testing. be installed,you'll be told that it can't. -i CA HIND The Hold-Up In Your Hood SERVER Cable Line What It is REAL-WORLD BENCHMARKING The telecommunications architecture that @ @ (for Both Time Warner and AT&T have part- cable companies have been using for the a @ LO € storing nered with major TV cable companies across last 20 years has always been one-way in 3 �',` delta) _ er major P Each of the four content transfer tests was conducted between 8p.m.and 9p.m.on three the country to provide a localized version of successive weeknights.Fastest times achieved are reported in min:sec. nature.As a result,to give you broadband, - - cable broadband service.You don't need to cable companies have to replace the old •n 4 Filet ; moxlawmlremaLaw tiAN9 Mf3 1519 aat$aPa.aw 525■9 FA mead one-way system with a two-way fiber- m0 z * ° Ater subscribe to cable Ti to get cable Internet hrwtpgedownload Isomdrawalaad b pd sttaorwsatrwlood y Y Y . •service, but it helps, especially since your optic based network that supports high- a home and neighborhood will already be ® speed data transmission.Unfortunately,this -. takes time and money--lots of both.In fact, �� .a wired. Here's how the whole system works: �� ;.F r over the past couple of years,national cable Er;° r Cable Q Neighborhoods are broken down into �d�� ..r P P Y r r a - separate nodes.These nodes,which may be '` companies have spent an estimated several I , Modem defined by streets, housing complexes, or 'j ) billion dollars to convert and upgrade urban dr• TV Y g P by 58k-9:34 56K-23:35 58K-199A9 56K-39:21 areas.Count yourself lucky if your area has '�. new home communities,are all served b a already been converted. Otherwise, there's O local head-end, the cable equivalent of a Y -17.; phone company's central office. All data 0M2 1:11 ■�� not else you can do but wait. REGIONAL DATA JCENTER HOW it Works Qyou really have to admire v from each local head end gets aggregated Our cable tests were conducted with�PHome service using a Motorola Cybersurfer Wave fiber-optic bandwidth. A typical fiber-optic Cable provides very fast bandwidth and caches popular web site content to expedite your online at a re jonal data center(RDC),which then modem capable of 30Mbps/1.5Mbps throughput.While our fastest cable time beat our fastest C O talks to a nationwide backbone for entry to DSL time in the FTP download test,overall cable performance exhibited wild variance:Our i cable, approximately 1.25cm in diameter, experience.The downside is its shared pipe—the more people on the same neighborhood node who the global Internet. slowest cable-driven 8.4MB MP3 download took 3:35;our slowest cable-driven 15MB FTP can carry in excess of 2.3 million si amete- are online at one time,the less bandwidth there is to go around. All houses on a specific node transmit download took 10:01.DSL variance,meanwhile,never fluctuated by more than 30 seconds in ous voice calls—about 484 times as much �e� any test(and DSL uploads kicked cable's butt,too). information as a 10cm copper line. Installation and connect the modem to an Ethernet CO data on the same pipe to the local head- end. PP ICI end. The local head end can cache web Hardware Required No two home installations will ever be adapter, which will likely be hooked sites that are popular in a particular area, the physical limitation of the USB bus, and both services. alike. However, if your PC is located near up to a free USB port. Once he completes based on a series of predefined metrics. the speed of your processor. On average, Installation generally costs around $100, You'll need a cable modem and a USB a cable TV outlet, installation will be a the hardware connections, the technician Because the data is cached in the head-end, you should expect speeds anywhere from but you can always negotiate the fee when Ethernet adapter. You can buy either piece piece of cake. Otherwise, the cable will boot up your PC, install some all subsequent user requests are served 300Kbps to 10Mbps, which are well within you call to set up service. Most companies of hardware yourself, but it may be best to installer may have to wire the room, snake software, take line measurements, test posthaste, with no delays—even if the the range of most DSL offerings.Of course, offer special deals, and even if they don't, let your provider furnish the modem to cables through the attic, or bring 'em in your PC again, and—if everything is global Internet is congested. your actual speeds can vary minute to it's always good to haggle.The service tech- ensure compatibility. No NIC is necessary, from the outside. working as it should be—get back in his Sharing a common pipeline is cable's minute, hour to hour,and day to day. nicians we spoke to all agreed that you can but you may need a cable splitter (also Once the physical cable terminus is truck and leave. You're now ready to bane.When you're on the pipe alone, you Although @Home is downright coy probably get a free installation if you try furnished by your provider). established, the service technician will test explore your new broadband access with enjoy the technology's maximum band- about its actual bandwidth offerings,Media hard enough. your PC to ensure there are no conflicts wide-eyed excitement. ■ width.But when 50 of your neighbors jump One isn't. A press spokesperson told us detected in the system. From there, he'll on, each individual's bandwidth drops Media One throttles its service back to a Where Can I Get It CABLE TIPS hook up the modem,plug in the cable line, CONTINUED ON PAGE 56 accordingly. Sharing a common pipe also maximum of 1.5Mbps downstream and According to Getspeed.com, approximately I raises the possibility of security breaches. 300Kbps upstream to provide a consistent 20% of U.S. homes that already subscribe experience, no matter the time of day or to cable TV can also receive cable Internet ► If you're concerned about security, disable file sharing III*Don't dismantle your PC before the installer arrives.They'll\ •i How Fast Is It? how many users are online simultaneously. access. At press time, more than 1 million in your PC. Cable users are conceivably more susceptible run tests to make sure the PC is running properly before and Because it uses a shared-pipe model,cable's users had already taken the plunge. to hackers because everyone shares a single node. However, after the installation • bandwidth is difficult to peg. DOCSIS, a How Much Does It Cost? Compared to DSL, cable Internet access is it's important to note that most cable modem data is encrypted new interface standard for cable modems, Generally, both Road Runner and @Home more widely available, with only a handful during transit. ■Keep a spot open on your surge protector for the modem. :I supports speeds up to 30Mbps both up and cost about $40 per month, though pricing of states—including Alaska, South Dakota, T downstream. Your actual bandwidth will can range from S35 to $55. This includes Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and to-For an extra fee,you can install cable service on two PCs to ■It's important to know which cable company might be > vary, of course, depending on how many unlimited usage, multiple e-mail accounts, North Dakota—bowing out of the band- set up a home-networking environment o your provider.Road Runner service is primarily available to cable people from the same node are online always-on connectivity,5MB of web space, width rodeo. The states with the widest subscribers serviced by Time Warner and Media One.@Home so Y simultaneously (congestion usually occurs and the rental cost of the modem.Cable TV deployments include California, Florida, ►You're not obligated to also subscribe to cable TV Don't get partners with the remaining cable operators, including from 7p.m.to 10p.m.on weekdays). service costs extra. However, local cable New York,Texas,and Michigan. bullied into paying for both services if you don't want'em. AT&T/TCI in the United States,and Rogers,Cox,and Shaw in x Canada. x 7c Bandwidth is also dependent on your PC companies are free to set their own prices, As expected, you'll have to check with 3 itself—how fast your Ethernet connection is, and you may score a deal if you subscribe to your local cable company to see if your area f 3 R 54 i _ For definitions of words,hyperlink to the back of Maximum PC,or check out the Terminator online at www.rnaximumpcmag.corn 55 1 , ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ADaPT . January 8,2001 RECEIVED ADaPT Job No.OR00-5739 FEB 1 5 2001 AT&T Broadband COMMUNITY OEVELOPMEN C/o Fraley Stricker Architects 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98122 Attention: Mr. David DeVoist Subject: AT&T Broadband @ Tigard Visual Site Reconnaissance SE corner of Tax Lot 800 14645 SW 74th Avenue, Tigard,Oregon Dear Mr. DeVoist: Further to our recent telephone conversation, an ADaPT Engineering representative visited the site on December 15, 2000, for the purpose of visually assessing the existing conditions of the site. The proposed equipment lease site measures 60-feet by 20-feet in plan area and is located near the southeast corner of Tax Lot 800 at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard,Oregon. The proposed equipment lease site is situated in a grassy area bounded by an asphalt-paved parking lot to the north and a gravel paved parking lot to the south. A chain-link fence demarcates the two parking lots. Based on our visual site reconnaissance, the topography of the proposed equipment lease site and the immediate area for a distance of 100 feet or more is relatively level. Ball Creek and Fanno Creek are located at a distance greater than about 100-feet from the proposed equipment lease area. No evident of ground slumping sliding was noted in the immediate area of the project site. We understand that the proposed equipment will be supported on a cast-in-place concrete slab measures 6-feet by 10-feet in plan area. We are of the opinion that the loading of the equipment is relatively light and the proposed installation would not adversely affect the existing site soils at this location. 800 Maynard Avenue South ADaPT Engineering,Inc. Tel(206)-654-7045 Suite 403 Fax(206)6547048 Seattle,Washington 98134 www.adaptengr.com I r ,+DaPT Engineering, Inc. We trust this letter meets your current needs. Should you have any questions concerning this report,or if we can assist you further,please contact us at(206)654-7045. Respectfully submitted, ADaPT Engineering,Inc. 401011r .1111 VIM K.V g. Senior Geotechnical Engineer (c4�p PROFesui „ �AG1NEk-,9 p2 / 1512 5 eREGON Peter J.DeSantis,P.E. o iGO l4 11�N4 \c Senior Reviewer R J DES `\ KVL/kvl AT&T Broadband do Fraley Stricker Architects January 8,2001 ADaPT Project No.WA00-5739 Page 2 ADaPT January 8, 2001 ADaPT Job No. OR00-5739 RECEIVED AT&T Broadband FEB 1 2001 C/o Fraley Stricker Architects COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle,Washington 98122 Attention: Mr. David DeVoist Subject: AT&T Broadband @ Tigard Visual Site Reconnaissance SE corner of Tax Lot 800 14645 SW 74th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon Dear Mr. DeVoist: Further to our recent telephone conversation, an ADaPT Engineering representative visited the site on December 15, 2000, for the purpose of visually assessing the existing conditions of the site. The proposed equipment lease site measures 60-feet by 20-feet in plan area and is located near the southeast corner of Tax Lot 800 at 14645 SW 74`h Avenue in Tigard,Oregon. The proposed equipment lease site is situated in a grassy area bounded by an asphalt-paved parking lot to the north and a gravel paved parking lot to the south. A chain-link fence demarcates the two parking lots. Based on our visual site reconnaissance, the topography of the proposed equipment lease site and the immediate area for a distance of 100 feet or more is relatively level. Ball Creek and Fanno Creek are located at a distance greater than about 100-feet from the proposed equipment lease area. No evident of ground slumping sliding was noted in the immediate area of the project site. We understand that the proposed equipment will be supported on a cast-in-place concrete slab measures 6-feet by 10-feet in plan area. We are of the opinion that the loading of the equipment is relatively light and the proposed installation would not adversely affect the existing site soils at this location. 800 Maynard Avenue South ADaPT Engineering,Inc. Tel(206)-654-7045 Suite 403 Fax(206)654-7048 Seattle,Washington 98134 www.adaptengr.com -,DaPT Engineering, Inc. We trust this letter meets your current needs. Should you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you further,please contact us at(206)654-7045. Respectfully submitted, ADaPT Engineering,Inc. • . V. g. Senior Geotechnical Engineer x,40 PROFeS, �� NGINE4 Q/0 . ty25 V rGQN Peter J. DeSantis,P.E. ��jf/rf8ER %1,�4��c� Senior Reviewer J DS P KVL/kvl AT&T Broadband do Fraley Stricker Architects January 8,2001 ADaPT Project No.WA00-5739 Page 2 ADaPT January 8,2001 ADaPT Job No. OR00-5739 AT&T Broadband C/o Fraley Stricker Architects 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98122 Attention: Mr. David DeVoist Subject: AT&T Broadband @ Tigard Visual Site Reconnaissance SE corner of Tax Lot 800 14645 SW 74th Avenue, Tigard,Oregon Dear Mr. DeVoist: Further to our recent telephone conversation, an ADaPT Engineering representative visited the site on December 15, 2000, for the purpose of visually assessing the existing conditions of the site. The proposed equipment lease site measures 60-feet by 20-feet in plan area and is located near the southeast corner of Tax Lot 800 at 14645 SW 74th Avenue in Tigard,Oregon. The proposed equipment lease site is situated in a grassy area bounded by an asphalt-paved parking lot to the north and a gravel paved parking lot to the south. A chain-link fence demarcates the two parking lots. Based on our visual site reconnaissance, the topography of the proposed equipment lease site and the immediate area for a distance of 100 feet or more is relatively level. Ball Creek and Fanno Creek are located at a distance greater than about 100-feet from the proposed equipment lease area. No evident of ground slumping sliding was noted in the immediate area of the project site. We understand that the proposed equipment will be supported on a cast-in-place concrete slab measures 6-feet by 10-feet in plan area. We are of the opinion that the loading of the equipment is relatively light and the proposed installation would not adversely affect the existing site soils at this location. 800 Maynard Avenue South ADaPT Engineering,Inc. Tel(206)-654-7045 Suite 403 Fax(206)654-7048 Seattle,Washington 98134 www.adaptengr.com • ,DaPT Engineering, Inc. We trust this letter meets your current needs. Should you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you further,please contact us at(206) 654-7045. Respectfully submitted, ADaPT Engineering,Inc. .V. g. Senior Geotechnical Engineer R�0 PROPe c;" NGtNEFsu% � ?r25 Peter J.DeSantis,P.E. o F,l��4 11',4q�co Senior Reviewer DES AT&T Broadband do Fraley Stricker Architects January 8,2001 ADaPT Project No.WA00-5739 Page 2 STRICKER CATO MURPHY ■ ARCHITECTS , P. S . • Il120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 100 RECEIVED Seattle , Washington 98122 Tel 206/324-4800 Fax 206/322-2875 E - Mail : office @scm -arch . com FEB 162001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Karen Fox, Planning Division February 15, 2001 Dear Ms. Fox, This letter is in response to the conditions of approval for the AT&T Broadband site located at 14645 SW 7th Ave, your case number SDR2000-00011. Condition 1, landscaping. With the addition of the proposed trees, shrubs and groundcover, the 25% landscape requirement for Tax Lot 800 has been satisfied. See Ll, landscape plan for further detail. Condition 2, noise emissions. Based off a report of a previous completed noise study on this type of equipment, the noise level is well below the Maximum Noise Levels as defined in chapter 7.40.170. See Crispaire report attached. Condition 3, topsoil. 8 Cubic yards of topsoil will be removed from the location of the equipment vault, in which some may be used for the proposed landscaping and the contractor will haul off the remaining. No topsoil will be retained at the site that could cause suffocation of the root systems of the surrounding trees. Condition 4, trash enclosure. The contractor is responsible for the removal of all debris during and after construction completion. This unmanned site is subject to AT&T personnel visitation once a month for maintenance purposes only, therefore a trash containment system would not be required or applicable to this site. Condition 5, parking space. The parking space has been revised to show a 9-foot by 18-foot area to comply with the minimum requirement of 7.5 feet by 16.5 feet as depicted in section 18.765.040 and the ingress/egress has been called out. See Al, detail 2 of architectural plan. Condition 6, tree plan. A landscape plan showing the proposed addition of trees, shrubs, and groundcover completed by Sandra Hasegawa, a licensed landscape architect is attached. All trees are to be retained and are called out on the architectural drawings. The contractor is responsible for protecting the trees during construction. See L1, landscape plan and Al, architectural plan for details. Telecommunications Division 5224 Wilson Avenue South Suite 101 Seattle,Washington 98118 Tel 206/760-4896 Fax 206/760-6225 STRICKER CATO MURPHY • ARCHITECTS , P. S . • Condition 7, visual clearance. The site plan has been revised to show a 30-foot visual clearance triangle at the driveway to the street adjacent to the site in accordance with chapter 18.795. AT&T's maintenance crew shall maintain the visual clearance as required. See sheet Al, detail 2 on architectural plan. Condition 8,fire hydrant clearance. The site plan has been revised to show a 3-foot 7-inch clearance from the fire hydrant to the fence, which complies with the minimum 3-foot requirement. See sheet Al, detail 2 on the architectural plan. Condition 9, ground condition. A visual site reconnaissance was completed by ADaPT Engineering, Inc. to asses the existing conditions and found that there was no evidence of ground slumping or sliding in the area of the project site. See ADaPT report attached completed by their Sr. Geotechnical Engineer. Condition 10, impact study. After reviewing the current use and condition of the subject lease area, we believe that by taking these measures we will be considerably improving the appearance of this site. By providing a higher quality fence and a softening landscape buffer, we will have installed a smaller, fully screened and simplified area with less visual impact improving the overall appearance. Thank you for taking the time to review this application. Should you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact our office at (206) 760-4896.4 Sin rely, i ‘,..., ... 116 David DeVoist Senior Project Manager Stricker Cato Murphy Architects Enclosure(s) -- ,reran•.' ii . ,flAUIA11(C Ida 006 Sound Reduction Attributed to ELNB Installation on RECEIVED AVP60 Wall Mount Air Conditioners In Boston Page 5 Second Day---Testing with ELNB on First Unit FEB 16 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Approximately 1 foot of snow on ground Ambient temperature = 39 °F Wind = approx. 15 MPH Background noise--variable due to high wind. Consistently higher than 58 dba. Linit with ELM installed Backgraarl 58 ctra (Vtrnman value) — Center line 45°left 45°Right b .c .o c c c c U V V mt Ca co m 4° w° io 10 10 10 10 10 10 o v V U c V A U ■ U ■ ' U 10 65 64.0 65 640 64 627 12 64 627 65 640 64 627 14 63 613 64 627 62 59.8 16 62 59.8 60 55.7 62 59.8 18 61 580 60 55.7 61 580 20 60 55.7 59 521 CO 55.7 25 60 55.7 60 55.7 59 521 30 59 521 59 521 59 521 m,,,,,n11t...ni.)Cl11rcr. 006 14]Sound Reduction Attributed to ELNB Installation on AVP60 Wall Mount Air Conditioners In Boston Page 5 'RECEIVED Second Day---Testing with ELNB on First Unit FEB 1 G 2001 Approximately 1 foot of snow on ground COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ambient temperature = 39 °F Wind = approx. 15 MPH Background noise—variable due to high wind. Consistently higher than 58 dba. Unit with EINB installed Backgitund 58 ch (Mr>mffn`slue) Canter Line 45°Left 45°Rif2ht a c c ° 0 0 o to to U U V Co Co Co CO c° 4° t° U 0 i. 1+ U gell 1g v Ca U U _ U 10 65 64.0 65 640 64 62.7 12 64 62.7 65 64.0 64 62.7 14 63 613 64 62.7 62 59.8 16 62 59.8 60 55.7 62 59.8 18 61 580 60 55.7 61 580 20 60 55.7 59 52.1 60 55.7 25 60 55.7 60 55.7 59 521 30 59 52.1 59 52.1 59 521 • ' SlimPac I - li 1.....,.-Ipt-I- MarVEIC' Environmental Control Units 1$09001 REGISTERED COMPANY. 0 Models ECU12A40-3.6 and ECU18A40-3.6 ., -T SlimPac I - Environmental Control Units - ; . The Marvair SlimPac line of Environmental Control Units(ECU)are { " designed for the telecommunication cabinet. The slim profile allows the . ` unit to be mounted quickly and simply on the exterior of the building on r ....Is �` either side of the splice chamber. SlimPac units have, as standard, the ��'`` necessary features to maintain the proper temperature control demanded i t, by the telecommunications industry. The SlimPac is designed for use in ambients from 0°F (-18°C)to 122°F(50°C). Their low noise level makes them ideal for installation in urban and residential areas.The SlimPac is available in nominal cooling capacities of 1 and 1-1/2 tons. ilterzin N.Standard Features ' ' Designed for operation down Ease of Installation to 0°F (-18°C) • Factory installed disconnect • Low ambient control cycles .. - condenser fan(ECU1 2)or modu • Can be installed on either side _ r lates condenser blower(ECU1 8) of splice chamber S/irr Pac 1 t to maintain proper refrigerant • Built-in mounting holes ECU12 pressures Remote Alarm Capability r • Timed low pressure by-pass • Dry contacts can be used for for low ambient start-up _ — remote alarm or notification Built-in Reliability upon lock-out _ • High and low refrigerant pres- Rugged Construction sure switches with lockout relay _ _ protects refrigerant circuit Copper tube, aluminum fin evaporator and condenser coils -___ • Time delay/anti-short cycle timer _ a prevents rapid cycling of the ' High efficiency compressor compressor • Baked on neutral tan finish Vandal Resistant • Decorative coil guard • All panels secured with tamper- Ease of Service : resistant screws(ECU1 8 only) • • All service access from front ""maw • All mounting holes are inside and top of unit the ECU - ., , ‘, . Slim Pac I . . SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 '.°'' ' r Supersedes SlimPac PD 3/97 ECU18 Model Identification Air Flow CFM @ ESP (Dry Coil) ECU 18 A 40 - 3.6 Model .00 .05 .10 .15 .20 .25 I ECU12 510 470 450 420 390 360 Electric Heat(3.6) ECU18 750 710 680 650 625 600 Designator = - 3.6 kW CFM=Cubic Feet/Minute Indoor Air Flow ESP=External Static Pressure in Inches WG Series(40)=No Vent& Counterflow Design (bottom discharge of cool air) Weight Voltage(A)=208/230V, 10,60 Hz ECU12 160 Ibs/73 kg Nominal Cooling Capacity(18)=18,000 BTUH ECU1 8 247 Ibs/112.5 kg (ECU)Environmental Control Unit Example: ECU18A40-3.6=Counterflow Vertical Package ECU Nominal 1.5 tons;208/230V,1e,60 Hz; 3.6 kW Electric Heat Summary Ratings Nominal BTUH Total Run Amps Model Electric Heat Heat Cool CFM/ESP MCA MFS Cool Heat ECU12A40-3.6 3.6 kw 12,287 12,000 420/.15 20 20 6.4 16.0 ECU18A40-3.6 3.6 kw 12,287 18,000 600/.25 22 25 13.9 16.6 Heating kw shown for 240V. Derate 240V by 25%for 208V service. The above chart should be used as a general guideline for estimating conductor size and overcurrent protection for the unit models listed.For specific requirements,refer to the data label attached to the unit cabinet. MCA=Minimum Circuit Ampacity(Wiring Size Amps)MFS=Maximum External Fuse or External HACR Circuit Breaker Size. Electrical Characteristics Comlressor Outdoor Fan'/Blower Motor* Indoor Blower Motor Model RIA LRA RPM FLA HP RPM FLA HP ECU12A40-3.6 4.8 26.3 1630 .62 1/10 1600 .95 1/8 ECU18A40-3.6 10.7 47.0 825 2.0 1/3 1075 1.6 1/4 The ECU12 has a propeller fan;the ECU1 8 has a blower. RLA=Rated Load Amps LRA=Locked Rotor Amps SlimPac 12 Cooling Performance (BTUH) SlimPac 18 Cooling Performance (BTUH) Outdoor Entering Indoor Air Temperature Outdoor Entering Indoor Air Temperature Temperature DB°F/°C Temperature DB°F/°C °F/°C 85°F/29°C 90°F/32°C 100°F/38°C °F/°C 77°F/25°C 85°F/29°C 95°F/35°C 95°F/35°C 11,785 12,670 14,140 85°F/29°C 18,630 19,430 20,300 100°F/38°C 11,580 12,450 13,910 95°F/35°C 17,880 _ 18,660 19,590 110°F/43°C 11,160 12,000 13,425 105°F/41°C 17,110 17,880 18,660 115`F/46°C 10,955 11,780 13,160 110°F/43°C 16,270 16,950 17,760 120 1F/49°C 15,430 15,900 16,800 SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 2 Dimensional Data - SlimPac I (ECU12) 16.1/8' MTG BRACKET 410mm HOLES-31'10(mm)DIAL CONDENSER —1-7/8'I48mm) s/r/ AIR INLET TOP ' 7(5tmm) A' i o t s CONDENSER 20-1/4' CONDENSER AIR OUT 514 mm AIR INLET BOTH SIDES 19-7/8' 21' 505 mm 533 mm [r---1512' L — 1�83,16'� ,16' 394 mm I 108 mm 1 mm jj RETURN // (SIIM P/T�7 OC 1.1 sa• AIR 12' 1473 mm 305 mm 1 "4.� H—14.578' �J • _ 45 mm 371 mm �1 t 1-3,4' 45 mm 19.114' y 4-5/13' —m 4.v t 489 mm 117Imm 117 mm se mm se mm CONDENSATE T7 O O..._.___------ 8.ELECTRICAL I 8'(22 mm) • KNOCKOUTS 81/16' I 205 mm SUPPLY AIR t275mm a } •t Front � mm� I 1..._12*--•� 78' 1 19mm 305mm 457 mm Left Side Back Dimensional Data - SlimPac I (ECU18) 1-1/4' 1-1/4' —_,. 8-&16' 8-5/16' .111-1. 32 mm 32 mm 3' t_ 211 mm 211 mm 76 mm 13' 76 mm `T } I 1/2'(13 mm) n 'Condenser 0500 7-3/4' a Mounting Holes(x4) (LR&ae) Condenser 197 mm 14-11/16' Intake 56-3/4' 373 mm • �. 58-3/4'A 1442 mm 1492 mm %ml Condenser 1-11/16'—w Air omlel &del' / 43 mm 3 °• I - 37-7/16' Return 951 mm Air 58-1/8' 1476 mm 48-1/4' C 1 1226 mm 2-1/4' 1016 mm 25-5/16' )57 mm 58' 40 643 mm Sight Glass 965 mm Observation if 10-3/4'(273 mm) 01/2'Low Voltage 9'(229 mm) Pigtail J Circuit Breaker 0 4 03/4'High Voltage Cover Pigtail Supply 11-7/16' ► ' ' ' . Air • 291♦mm 13-1/4' r ' 7 t T 6-1/4' 337 mm--►►ii �--15-7/16'—� 159 mm s_15-1/2'x, � 392 mm Right Side 394 mm 459 mm 1-1/4• ,8• Front 32 mm 457mm — Left Side v' Back 0 ♦ 1-11!16'} .4_ 43 mm I 7/8' Mounting 22mm Bracket 1.31/32' j Condensate 50 mm ] _01/2'(13mm)FPT 7-3/4" r'' 197 mm --- 'Condenser air outlet can be from either left or right side. 15-1/2' 2.114' Bottom Condenser air outlet can be selected in field. 394 mm 57 mm 3 SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 I • 41, ac Ik Operation Accessories The SlimPac I ECU is controlled by a thermostat that Grilles senses the internal cabinet temperature. When cooling is Supply Grille—P/N 80685 desired, the compressor, evaporator blower and condenser 13" x 5" (330 mm x 125 mm) fan (ECU1 2)or blower(ECU1 8)turn on. Cool air is dis- charged near the bottom of the SlimPac into the cabinet. Return Air Filter Grille P/N 80680 When two SlimPacs are used on the same cabinet, the 17" x 12" (358 mm x 305 mm) CommStat 3 or Marvair LL357A provides temperature Thermostats control of the redundant units and equal run time on both CommStat 3 Lead/Lag Controller, P/N S/75341 units.A field installed jumper wire on the low voltage A digital, programmable thermostat designed to operate control board in the SlimPac will permit the evaporator two SlimPacs in a fully or partial redundant application. blower to run continuously. The SlimPac can also be immediately shut off when used in cabinets with a fire or (See the CommStat 3 Product Data Sheet for details.) smoke alarm system. Please refer to the Installation Manual LL357A Lead/Lag Controller, P/N 08044 for details. Electric heat is standard. Two stage cool and heat thermostat with solid state module for redundant operation with adjustable interstage differential. (See the LL357A Product Data Sheet for details.) Thermostat, P/N 50071 and Sub-Base, P/N 50072 One stage cool and one stage heat with fan and system switch. Thermostat, P/N 50059 and Sub-Base, P/N 50062 Two stage cool and two stage heat with system switch but no fan switch. Complete installation instructions are in the SlimPac Manual. Detailed dimensional data available upon request. As part of the Marvair continuous improvement program,specifications are subject to change without notice. Sales&Marketing 3285 Saturn Court NW•Norcross,GA 30092•Ph: 770-734-9696•Fax:770-453-9323 MarvairEmail:sales @marvair.com•Internet:www.marvair.com kx Mfg.&Engineering P.O.Box 400•Cordele,GA 31010•Ph:912.273-3636•Fax:912-273-5154 ISO S00!REGtSTERED DOY�AMY i Email:cordele @marvair.com SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 4 m Crispaire,Division of AIRXCEL,Inc.9/99 • -a rva I r cEnvironm Enta l Contr of Units ISO 9001 REGISTERED COMPANY Models ECU12A A-3.6 and ECU18A40-3.6 SlimPac I - Environmental Control Units The Marvair SlimPac line of Environmental Control Units (ECU)are s" is :`-`.~``=�. w designed for the telecommunication cabinet. The slim profile allows the ,'. `: � N unit to be mounted quickly and simply on the exterior of the building on `` ., ti < either side of the splice chamber. SlimPac units have, as standard, the 'NZ' w necessary features to maintain the proper temperature control demanded . `� �� \` by the telecommunications industry. The SlimPac is designed for use in - ambients from 0°F (-18°C)to 122°F (50°C). Their low noise level makes them ideal for installation in urban and residential areas.The SlimPac is available in nominal cooling capacities of 1 and 1-1/2 tons. tl Standard Features -,, Designed for operation down Ease of Installation to 0°F (-18°C) t • Factory installed disconnect '',4A' : • Low ambient control cycles 'k ...-<, condenser fan(ECU12)or modu- • Can be installed on either side lates condenser blower(ECU18) of splice chamber Slim Roc I ' to maintain proper refrigerant • Built-in mounting holes ECU12 pressures Remote Alarm Capability • Timed low pressure by-pass ._ - for low ambient start-up ' Dry contacts can be used for _- remote alarm or notification . Built-in Reliability Y upon lock-out - • High and low refrigerant pres- Rugged Construction sure switches with lockout relay • protects refrigerant circuit Copper tube, aluminum fin evaporator and condenser coils li _ • Time delay/anti-short cycle timer i- prevents rapid cycling of the ' High efficiency compressor compressor • Baked on neutral tan finish Vandal Resistant • Decorative coil guard • All panels secured with tamper- Ease of Service , resistant screws(ECU1 8 only) • All service access from front • All mounting holes are inside and top of unit the ECU - ,..,., kit ... ,, :_ Slim Pac I ' , „. SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 "" --- Supersedes SlimPac PD 3/97 ECU18 Model Identification Air Flow CFM @ ESP (Dry Coil) ECU 18 A 40 - 3.6 Model .00 .05 .10 .15 .20 .25 I ECU12 510 470 450 420 390 360 Electric Heat(3.6) ECU1 8 750 710 680 650 625 600 Designator = - 3.6 kW CFM=Cubic Feet/Minute Indoor Air Flow ESP=External Static Pressure in Inches WG Series(40)=No Vent Et Counterflow Design (bottom discharge of cool air) Weight Voltage(A)=208/230V, 1e,60 Hz ECU12 160 lbs/73 kg Nominal Cooling Capacity(18)=18,000 BTUH ECU1 8 247 Ibs/112.5 kg (ECU)Environmental Control Unit Example: ECU18A40-3.6=Counterflow Vertical Package ECU Nominal 1.5 tons;208/230V,1 o,60 Hz; 3.6 kW Electric Heat Summary Ratings Nominal BTUH Total Run Amps Model Electric Heat Heat Cool CFM/ESP MCA MFS Cool Heat ECU12A40-3.6 3.6 kw 12,287 12,000 420/.15 20 20 6.4 16.0 ECU18A40-3.6 3.6 kw 12,287 18,000 600/.25 22 25 13.9 16.6 Heating kw shown for 240V. Derate 240V by 25%for 208V service. The above chart should be used as a general guideline for estimating conductor size and overcurrent protection for the unit models listed.For specific requirements,refer to the data label attached to the unit cabinet. MCA=Minimum Circuit Ampacity(Wiring Size Amps)MFS=Maximum External Fuse or External HACR Circuit Breaker Size. Electrical Characteristics Compressor Outdoor Fan*/Blower Motor* Indoor Blower Motor Model RLA LRA RPM FLA HP RPM FLA HP ECU12A40-3.6 4.8 26.3 1630 .62 1/10 1600 .95 1/8 ECU18A40-3.6 10.7 47.0 825 2.0 1/3 1075 1.6 1/4 The ECU1 2 has a propeller fan;the ECU1 8 has a blower. RLA=Rated Load Amps LRA=Locked Rotor Amps SlimPac 12 Cooling Performance (BTUH) SlimPac 18 Cooling Performance (BTUH) Outdoor Entering Indoor Air Temperature Outdoor Entering Indoor Air Temperature Temperature DB°F/°C Temperature DB°F/°C °F/°C 85°F/29°C 90°F/32°C 100°F/38°C °F/°C 77°F/25°C 85°F/29°C 95°F/35°C 95°F/35°C 11,785 12,670 14,140 85°F/29`C 18,630 19,430 20,300 100°F/38°C 11,580 12,450 13,910 95°F/35°C 17,880 18,660 19,590 110°F/43°C 11,160 12,000 13,425 105°F/41°C 17,110 17,880 18,660 115°F/46°C 10,955 11,780 13,160 110°F/43°C 16,270 16,950 17,760 120°F/49°C 15,430 15,900 16,800 SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 2 Dimensional Data - SlimPac I (ECU12) 16-1/8' MTG BRACKET d/0 mm� HOLES-3/5'10(mm)D1A CONDENSER } -1-7/e'(datum) //HOLES AIR INLET TOP 1 2'(51 mm) /+ A . . CONDENSER 20-1/4' 1 CONDENSER AIR OUT 514mm AIR INLET BOTH SIDES 21' 505 mm 533 mm I 15-1?--or] 1 6-38'mm 16'y,I ,r 3m16m' 396 mm ( RETURN (Sf/M(T P C s' A1R 12. 147mm 305 mm - 1-34— 1.4--37,-5,4,•� )4.-1-3/4' 45 mm e 45 mm 4-SE' 4-SR• 19-1/d' �tt7mm~ X117 mm~ A89 mm 2.1/4'-e * — w2-1/4' 58 mm nvn CONDENSATE f 0 ry 0 0.........-- 8 ELECTRICAL `7/8-(22 ) KNOCKOUTS mm 8.1/16• a 205 mm SUPPLY ER ff 127 mm 0 �• 1.---13-3/8•�I + [ Front 340 mm 1 3�<' la---12----.I 18' 19 mm 305 mm 457 mm Left Side Back Dimensional Data - SlimPac I (ECU18) 1-1/4' 1-1/4_71..._ '1 8-5/16' 8-5/16' .41 AA- 32 mm 32 mm - 211 mm .0-- 211 mm 3 rl 76 mm ) ow 3' 76 mm + N ° c°mo matr • 1/2'(13 mm 7-3/4' arowml Mounting Holes(e4) (LH aml• Condenser 14-11/16' V Intake 197 mm 56-3/4' 373 mm . ► 58-3/4' 1442 mm 1492 mm e Com Oot/.r 1.11/16'—ow Air Ovu•t 43 mm 3 > 1RH Sm1' 3 • J t U A 37-7/16' Return 951 mm AI` 58-1/8' i 1 1476 mm t 48.1/4' 1226 mm 40 -�' 2-1/4' 25-5/16' �57 mm 38' 1016 mm Si ht Glass 643 mm Observation 0 965 mm 10-3/4'(273 mm) O 1/2•Low Voltage k 9'(229 mm) Plgtall 1 Circuit Breaker E A Hi gh Voltage oltage Cover O 3/4' Pigtail Supply 11-7/16' r ' , Air 291 mm 1 A 13_1,4._,..r- 337 6-1/4' mm j 15-7/16'f 159 mm ,S__15-1f2'_ , 18-1,16' 392 mm Right Side 394 mm 459 mm---�� 1-1/4' 18• Front 32mm. 457 mm Left Side \"" `, Back t 4 • 1-11/16'--► +- 43 mm 7/B' Mounting 22 mm Bracket 1-31/32" 1 Condensate 50 mm i 01,2'(13mm)FPT 7-3/4' ,,, 197 mm 'Condenser air outlet can be from either left or right side. 15-1/2' 2-1/4• Bottom Condenser air outlet can be selected in field. 394 mm 57 mm 3 SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 .-d „w -t*� 4`baa 4 14i emu o � fwr ' aX a '. Operation Accessories The SlimPac I ECU is controlled by a thermostat that Grilles senses the internal cabinet temperature. When cooling is Supply Grille—P/N 80685 desired, the compressor, evaporator blower and condenser 13" x 5"(330 mm x 125 mm) fan(ECU1 2)or blower(ECU1 8)turn on. Cool air is dis- charged near the bottom of the SlimPac into the cabinet. Return Air Filter Grille—P/N 80680 When two SlimPacs are used on the same cabinet, the 17" x 12" (358 mm x 305 mm) CommStat 3 or Marvair LL357A provides temperature Thermostats control of the redundant units and equal run time on both units.A field installed jumper wire on the low voltage CommStat 3 Lead/Lag Controller, P/N 5/75341 A digital, programmable thermostat designed to operate control board in the SlimPac will permit the evaporator two SlimPacs in a fully or partial redundant application. blower to run continuously. The SlimPac can also be immediately shut off when used in cabinets with a fire or (See the CommStat 3 Product Data Sheet for details.) smoke alarm system. Please refer to the Installation Manual LL357A Lead/Lag Controller, P/N 08044 for details. Electric heat is standard. Two stage cool and heat thermostat with solid state module for redundant operation with adjustable interstage differential. (See the LL357A Product Data Sheet for details.) Thermostat, P/N 50071 and Sub-Base, P/N 50072 One stage cool and one stage heat with fan and system switch. Thermostat, P/N 50059 and Sub-Base, P/N 50062 Two stage cool and two stage heat with system switch but no fan switch. Complete installation instructions are in the SlimPac Manual. Detailed dimensional data available upon request. As part of the Marvair continuous improvement program,specifications are subject to change without notice. • Sales&Marketing 3285 Saturn Court NW•Norcross,GA 30092•Ph:770-734-9696•Fax:770-453-9323 MarvairEmail:sales@marvair.com•Internet:www.marvair.com Mfg.&Engineering P.O.Box 400•Cordele,GA 31010•Ph:912-273-3636•Fax:912-273-5154 .G.•,••0.1l1eD COMIPAMY Email:cordele@marvair.com SlimPac I PD 9/99-2 4 ®Crispaire,Division of AIRXCEL,Inc.9/99 —l. 0 0 �.,m I> —I 7O —.nm L 3 b ,- - _I ® 0 D/` -17--- __, 90 y ? pF a F ,r. o P 6 v > r LI a ,° �j 7QQ + v 0 )04_144 *pip m g F�S� rr X03 7r�tl r �� O€ � tFg g {-g Y�� YAi114�� l�� g V 7 y co 5r�AO T1 e >z vg-Vro R O2 III E 6 � ` Nit;o g m 0 ° p0 07A " p $41ifWg'i -giR g% i$111� Vi li FV g � D tam $ t !. 1i cr �jj° gr - m - T Oil 2p2 dpp 1 p !ig r h II Z; !!! 3 4 gith 4$ a 194 ''j 0 20 :):;, Ngq45 iiitm 4i at i 4 0 pm V gqiiil 4 4 %g5/§mi ggN g !O 2 0 in °Igtilli,Tg 1PAi q tP el 0 . gig hN Ag b IN Tigl 40g- 11 %4 p it o4$ 714 Ago ° ° � I: �e . li 8141 it5i ti 9 (P,"iiV 6M 8g1 44 g ca islijin. iMEI;SI fi ,.. 16 ilk 3 egrti litid iii .m° 9d b 44 �77 i 6 ii"gi . � 1� $°� 11 1 o0 m�g� �na �- 0 O °�C AFb�'� �c � 1Z r+ G a 0 €Q R o 0 b 4; € ilo0 Ar ag ljii _ Q c cn �_ ; E_ �f gg d 5 � �l Cs iiq4gii ;x 0; a 8 A H OP rIt z ,-,° -.R V ii m P. 0 lii r 6 i Ht .12 ;g ', g m r v . r z z 3 X rn �5 �rny1 3I gill m 1- o —f fib “ I i " 7(1 ° E i � ° g OF �t - I i i�oA il' 60 i2 m , , A , ii ; � 4 �osla Jp O m � rn r RR � � � 0 � ' � g � � r $ 8 �{ gg ]6�o > g F g i9 Dili S t-r, “ Tri In "{� i D V V . p. a 1 d S 1 8 a f- k m 3 0 g g �"R c C , m m C b o Q QUA g � i °z °05 - CM mT1 ; i ih 5° G =1 g tg5 A o ci ( b L r el r � ° +iAh23g611 1W73 a5' i+ € Td i b ; 2 i CLIENT. ..a u II// 3 PRELIMNARY P10'JJEc1 �u° i'o`r�.»u n+1pO,°�° „� REVIaION 74th - Bonita ,� g Z.. 3/20/00 PERMIT NT AT&T ABROADBMD MEFMET SERVICES �6 °•�° �Itnm E 0.06 I' Iro/00 REV1eION 14845 S.W.74th Street ”' ""'°" AT&T d o�s7�4 SW AVE =7.6 ,z. 1„ POR?LAPD,OR 97201.45a7 N — ° 120 IAKESIDE AVE. SUITE 100 ° SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 ° (206) 324-4800 0 FAX (206) 322-2875 FRALEY / STRICKER ARCHITECTS I iILIIILI1Ii ■ \ !iiIid \ \ '\\ V' 100 YEAR ELEVATION \ w ti PER FEUA PANEL NO. 19CIerRIG °•S 410276-005 DATED \ •'" E \ D 3-1-82 \\ pda EE it Ile\ \, in a1DE7uALK ......... \ -� 1 EXISTING '\ \ 0414 my L A$P ALT DRIVEWAY :::333 7 \ \3s._ __ el ovERALL F noF Derr _- -- -- -- ) __ , V - 7:9 _ ,1'" I i • y EXISTING /�� N' le r�ae � FANNO ) Euc�onn , ' ? I CREEK/ : �"IC/f EXISTING C S' /_._- �_ I I V CAIERRY / �•.'. EXISTING 1 NEW CUM TTTJ 3 LANDSCAPING ` I RAN `■ �__•-_...-: \/ !S'-O'NETDAfJC ■ Se VISUAL ' • �''�' / h,S, CLEM:MC'C /' I • TIJAN]LE If • • eEE NOTE 2 TOP OF BANK // !///ESE 9F.P:4 !//////f/////////!, _ _ / �� OF PA =ice il \ :/ <'•., I I i < i 1• S'-o' Y �LANDaU1FE AREA , 24��O"\ , \ / `�x x e __ __ __ __ ��/L/1 LLLL L/ �—x x l--- X—x x— —x—x—x—"y-- — _- \ NLIDNG GATE ` I ./ I /'•I ; i \ x I I r O �r°�ANr " BALL $\ r It- 5 I 1 ` -- 1 1x �� EASEMENT F- fi_`-' e I CREEK co v� I=. II , ! \ co 6 VI x<' oxE io J 4-C I /tr NEE S/A74�\ a'-o• ' \ 7VC SIB Fae Y / MINE WO a i __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ 1 n a .::,_ \ DETAILS\ INar N CCMRACT.{ i i \ x I -- -_ `' ix, ...�I i I NOTES: fa :1-- ; us �' \ \ �P-O•S r•R k\i .x I I. ALL TOPSOIL REMOVED FROM THE SUf2FACE IN PREPARATION FOR GRADING AND o I CON57RUGTION IS TO BE STORED ON OR NEAR THE 517E AND PROTECTED FROM• i. i i EROSION WHILE GRADNG OPERATIONS ARE UNDERWAY,AND SUCH STORAGE MAT 1 Lr FA GRAVEL OVE121FED i_ I - I i X\ I NOT BE LOCATED WHERE IT WOULD CAUSE SUFFOCATION OF ROOT SYSTEMS OF A I x FADRIG T#�l7CiaSf, o I f. : I TREES INTENDED TO BE PRESERVED,AND AFTER COMPLETION OF SUCH GRADING, ;, carouone�cEO Ara<a - I THE TOPSOIL 15 TO SE RESTORED TO EXPOSED CUT AND FILL EMBANKMENTS OR •� _x---x z—�IiO K x x t� -zt x' x x J x—x—x—x—x—x Ns,C�.a BUILDING PADS TO PROVIDE A SUITABLE BASE FOR SEEDING AND PLANTING. ' '' < a ` �Neu°1ANLNKFENCE 85 I 2. A 30 VISUAL CLEARENCE TRIANGLE SHALL SE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ACCESS , NEE VA7 FOR DETAIL I s'-o / v-a DRIVEWAY AND ADJACENT STREET(SLI.-14TH AVENUE). LANDCAPNG N THIS O \ I AREA SHALL NOT BE TALLER THAN 3'FROM TOP OF CURB. EXISTING TREES N THIS AREA HIGHER THAN 3'SHALL BE PRUNED 50 THAT ALL BRANCHES BELOW 8' OFROM TOP OF CURS SHALL BE REMOVED SO THAT A VISULAL CLEARENCE FROM / 3'TO 8'CAN BE MAINTAINED. pcIaTNG TREES TO NEJ 3. EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED SEE 1/AI FOR IDENTIFICATION ~ ID ENTIFICATION TTIFICATION FEXISTING t i2 it tP II . I°,m,,,�R� U sw11 DE• I i `/��/ I EASEMENT-PLAN\\\ , 1 .SITE-RAN 1 . <7 O , SITE PLAN Al 2 EASEMENT PLAN SCALE.vs-t-o O SCALE:VIS•I'-D (OF 51-IEETS I . - 1g1¢::;gg p !; N ,, 10'-0'TYPICAL PANEL 11'.0'CLEAR GATE OPENING b-0� pppl S apt I- O m' ➢ i ! SLIDIN!i GATE PER MFR SPECIE! •ilONS t ■ h FINISH CLEAN CRUSHED TRTOC W/NO FINES TOP RAIL 1 I I hIldillill�g 4'MN THICKNESS /x SLOPE 25% i�i�i�i�i�i�i°i•i•i�i�i*i:i:..:i:i:i:i:%.:i:i:i:i:i:i:i�i�i:i:i:%� ��i;i�i�i'i�i'i'i''.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•S•�•;•�...%:.,:•,:•...;•:.:•:.;.:.:.:.:.:4;i i:i:i'i:i:i:i i�i�i�i�i�i�i�. EXIST GRADE EXIST GRADE r�iiii�i1r•�•�•�i�i4:�i�i�:*i�•*•��*••••••��*�•�•i•�*ii:::i�l i�:�ii•:•i•:•i�i'•:�i��i•:�:•i�:�i�i�iii��i�.�ii i•.i i:�� i�•rig.•��.�.�� •.•�•••••*•: f� ``.rg=,g=•5•47i�- .1• -_ n %.7,4 4••••1••••••••0.0•i•0+00.1•••••••• •••••••••••••••::•:•••� •• :••••.• 0•••••••r• �•••• •••••• W `v�`V V v 11 �11=11=II::II=II-,;=II=I1_ 11-11=i V �`�`. ,1i�•••••�I r�••�•i�•••••••••••°••••••••••••••••••:•••••••••••�I 1•�•:•..*:.:4.:0•�••i.•:•:•:•�•:•:�k.:.:.:,:.:.:.:÷:,,:.f..,:.:.:.:.:'••• i•:•:•:• .4.x i.:. N VV.Y��W,�7/*r�/V'''',4;'43.WV \' i i i•:::1 i::.'.:i:.:::i:.'i•i*i�i•.�.i i :::::❖:i�I PO.••:i:QO•'�•i:•:.):..��.•O.�i:•:ii00.iiii O:•.iiii 'i�••:��•�•�• �i�•••�•�•� /4��/��i////�A y� A '°:°:°:+: i:. :.'i.�%i��•:%i:�:i iii i'i i P.❖i ii••1 i i%%%%:% .:::i%:i% X:�i i!�•i i i i�: iii :::::::%°•:::::ri �� %%i %%%%%��i EXCAVATE MN NECESSARY TO i i0'10•'�i:4•.:O•*:+:•O+•O'Pi X:*I '•00000•'.0 04-:•:•i'• ',IX..;•:O•.•.•.i.�•.••••0�• :::i:.*:::,.t$ ::i:•:••O•• GRUB PROPOSED ROAD BED. •000'10000 i•OOi•=l!:•��•'00••O`Oi i�00i ri�0.0000.`•:•: O•i'i•00•i��i�i •i�0i••••�•:• ••�0 ri�•i•0�'O.O:. •:•:• F�i�i i�i'i� •�•� •I•i�i i••0000�00'0�•..•6*•O•i�•e••.•• MAX.*••••O�•i i 00•i i0••i`.iii;•.•�i�•••i00 Vii•O�OOi•0• •::Oi•.•.•.•• ��i�i�i•+i REMOVE SO SOIROOTS AND ALL •i i i iri i. ..S�i�i�i.••..:. ' ��i'.•1•07:1 i:i•.:i•'i�i''ice•!ii i i�•••••. •'•••• i•• 'i i••• :...:....• CLRO I LNSUITABLE USE APPROVED FILL WHERE T••�:rdis4y 4,t•••••• ••••••M1�.• ••••••�.. I .t•_:_•:_•:•_:•_:!...!...".41.7.�•�•_�•�•�•. ��... •��.��/�. -•--- _ � REQUIRED TO GRADE ROAD AS •' '//, fv : // TO 50%. NOTES COMPACT SUGRADE 'si %//!///f /l/�/ll/ /i///�/i!/��////%/�/j �/�/j //i//� TO 50x. / g NOTES I ASRRETE�ION ITE GRADhYa WI-ERE NECESSARY,DUE TO SOIL CONDITIONS,PROVIDE 80TT.TENSION FILL - 6'MN I-1/2 MINUS COMPACTED CRJSFED ROCK BASE OVER " COMPACTED SUBGRADE • �� RECD a E GHAN LNK FABRIC FENGMG 111/VNYL SLATS- COLOR W/OE R Q•DIA F001'11F001'11.41•LIE POOT DETAIL: GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD AS , 3„ . z SCALE.3/e•-r-o• FINISH GRADE .■ d NOTES T © L GATE POST AND CORNER POST:2-V0' D.PIPE,SGHED 00 ASTM-F1003 n 2. LINE POST:2-110'OD.PIPE,SCHED 00 ASTM-F1003 I_ POLLER 3. GATE FRAME:L90'O .5CHED 00 AST•-F1003 • .4 ' D E ; PEDESTAL ' GONGRETE 4. TOP AND BRACE RAIL:1.66 O .PIPE,SC-ED 50 ASTM-E1083 .I '� • .�1 DOOR _I' 5. FABRIC:5 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2'1 E5H FABRIC TO TOUCH GRAVEL BASE . - ;It < 0 3 .I I- I OPENING al�� SCORE LINES 6. TIE LLARE:MINIMUM II GA GALVANIZED STEEL (.y4 I •d GRADE IcWE I ! 4 I a . BCHAINLINK FENCE 6 1- E L J L -L I CHAINLINK FENCE/GATE ELEVATION IA SECTION < FRONT RIGHT 61DE OGLE.3/W-I-0' !GALE` ° 1a g Ty iii AIR CONDITIONER ' ■_ �, WIT.TYP. liii! 41__M L 1M� E p 03 GRADE GRADE FOR F'OUIERRTELGO FOR FIBER OPTIC 0 n a ii I B • B I LIFT•Cs GL.EVIS AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED m 1 I I I I I y– COVER No.51-T-4-2C 3 g Q Lit Id TYP•(4)LOC. JDmm Lne L J L A J SURFACE RESTORATION '•DIA ACCESS u I ID TS W B.Q LEFT 8wE 2[$ $\- I" BACKFILL j\j\j i4�iacee Mi�i TAL EEVTON : C.U.E. A //0 VAULT NO.blb-LA; .l g3 >j ,` 72OO LDe / 111111 p ! c \ > \ b'WIDE MARKER 2 aDe. • TAPES CONTINUOUS \ % \ \/*' .r' I ALONG ROUTE I• 3' • .\� I, ` 0• cO \ .• • 4't 5CH 40 PVC LLV l / ■ ` - t al L•1 o y\\� y I NTERDUGT ENCASED Q r... / b'X u'KNOCKOUT I` ° y� �/ / �. I IN CONCRETE :, ••• �/ 7 EACH SIDE 0 Q / (2)PER TRp1CN 'R• r - 7 EACH END ` / Z 6•I I j- 2'M1N PVC TELCO CONDUIT I v`v ■ // ENGAS=D IN CONCRETE // / biro R GRADE �\`/// g 0 a \. N.I"w✓� i:N . //./* /� 2'�MIN PVC POWER CONDUIT �f� i a� / 6 e e Ay '�jO.�jN.�1 tl�# NOTE: \ ENCASED IN CONCRETE \' /•/•/\ \/ . S S �� r 7 PLACES N FLOOR ! 9 a +( 9 �v�!�eC ��`�`Q4. WATERPROOFING PER 1'FR. GALv'C'Cw.weL V jj`1 '0/ FIELD VERIFY CONDUIT DEPTH TO 2 LQ PROJ.• PRairrars E Vj� A vt,,*•/• MATCH LOCATION OF UTILITY VAULT- I EAC41 END �` • >/� FROST OW NOTE: UTLRY VAULT 575-LA -, '��. •` ARP,-D p7� DETAILS •` .• . j+y.�. �/�--•- •)+�6 : .i�„ •, t' PER LOCATION SET T INI OF GRADE FLUSH �• / .. I4s, I4/ j. i�. '�!) wTN FNIeN GRADE I IR'CRUSHED GRAVEL FILL �� UNDISTURBED SOIL 4 I/2'COURSE GRAVEL FILL SECTION: C.U.E. ODETAIL: TYPICAL TRENCH El) 515-LA VAULT W/ GROUND ROD SCALE.V7'.1'•0' •�,� SCALE.I'-1'-0' N79 IOF SHEETS € Pi RI E b To SERVICE I UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT TYP CADWELD CONN UTILITY VAU T UTILITY VAU T SEE 6/EI SEE 2/A2 SEE 2/A2 GL BARE'2 AU BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE PCLLER POLE I BELOW GRADE/TYP) V Q 25'OF COILED I./\/ 11V4 iffil k dil I t g 4 CONDUCTORS 1 10'�c3/4'ROD(TYP) BY CONTRACTOR /, STAINLESS STEEL /� Ch SEAL ENTRANCE i \`/� - 1 FROM RAN �1 I g I I II I UTILITY TRENCH I I I 36'MNIMU'1 e BURIAL DEPTH © I I� ALONG EASEMENT I (SEE 3/A2 FOR DETAIL) �II IMIRE I I — -- ----I-• O� 1 I-IUB a GROUND BUS Q Q z NM 1 I FUTURE CLE. IE�I� V j GROUND LEVEL I I !_ 11=11 11=11=1 11-114p- 11=11=11=11-11=11=11= jjj�� 1 11-1=11=1.-111=I1— TO TGI F11B 1 I I µµµ>111 NOTE$ NOTES LOCATE RODS NEAR BLDG CORNERS, MM 3'FROM LOCAL POWER COMPANY TO PROVIDE FINAL TERMINATION I ' 3 BLDG STRICTURE OF CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR TERMINATIONS AT>IFMR I I I rA I 5 GROUNDING PLAN 3 CONDUI T AT POWER POLE I I d `n ZNTS ; j I mo, s III -- -----H�,3 I6•e CONCRETE 1 I CONCRETE E(CUE) ACCESS PORT LW'LID BARE CONDUCTOR ( I I ENCLOSURE(CUE) K I 0 co N I G' MANUAL 'V •`� a N w�, TRANSFER PANEL 0 nap \tr GROUND LEVE SWITCH 3% Q • _11).__111-111--111-11 1 a i T"'T _ SEE GROUNDINGI CO I�I I�I I II I a" 31�—I I I I I I� PLAN(5/ED 1 —� I u�,� W t I I-.11 ]I� m 2'ePvC-(3)3/0 z-I }--�® p U III Loll:H I a 4 IIHICII—II G---- -I I=1=1 - METER t METER SOCKET I -- - _ _ IT= =1 -1I 1-1 I 1=1 = ATE 2'oC-(3)'3/0 =111 111 11E11=11 111E1 11=1 L 1 I-1 Q 111-1I• 1 I— 1-1-111 1 1 Ir _ '1=11 111 1 SERVICE DISCONNECT OFCI OELECTRICAL PLAN — =1111 u F= 9GALE:3/D'•I'-0' - _IL=111=1 i ii iI� 3 A11.6 BARE T _ .-- _ ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS ELECTRICAL FLAG NOTES COPPER WIRE - 2.4C43)3/0 FLAG NOTE BORE BENEATH THE ROAD FOR POWER CONDUIT. COORDINATE WITH LOCAL I- f © GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES FOR PROPER DEPTH•EXISTING POWER PO.E V MIS !. PANEL BOARD IS 200'FROM SITE. 240/120v,to © PROVIDE 0 FEET OF CONDUIT UP THE POWER POLE. PROVIDE 25 FEET OF COILED J U 240/120A i• SE RATED o� OR FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH QiLri CONDUCTOR PROVIDE TEMPORARY RAIN SEAL AT TOP CONDUIT. COORDINATE yl �y 3 100A CFGI LOCAL ELECTRIC GOMPMIY FOR) 1R TERMINATION LL LL_ OR TRANSFORMER INSULATING 10' ROD TEST GROUND FROM INTERIOR BW. MUST DE LESS THAN 5 OHMS TO EARTH. gQ 0 �/ O KW METER © CONTACT ENGINEER FOR PROPER CROWD TEST PROCEDLLR£. P TEST RESULTS T N 9 W SNOW IMPEDANCE GREATER THAN 5 OHMS,NOTIFY ENG MEER FOR A,5 STANCE M C C 6 [CFj=�JII II PANEL A A SPECIAL PURPOSE LOCATING GROUND RODS. 240/120v,lo,3W RECEPTACLES I 200A • MANHOLE PI�U'• `/ SE RATED O wars I =7'1 OFCI -�� OR --7 1— BREAK FOR CLARITY NOTE: OR DISTANCE I I EXPOSED RACEWAY FEET WELL REQUIRED. G — UNGROUNDING E 1 cn FIELD VERIFY LOCATION _ —- DERGROUND RACEWAY GROUNDING ROD DETAIL ONE LINE DIAGRAM D CONDUIT ENTERING CONDUIT ENTERING NTS F= NTS --�— OR EXITING GRAPE I OF S-IEE-S s/a" IRON ROD LEGAL DESCRIPTION-PARENT PARCELL N 89' 32' 30" W W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP-. 5/8" IRON ROD / W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PARCEL III: 19.80 ./ PP 0115 A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, N..89'..32.30" W OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF 367.45 WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED Z 25 AS FOLLOWS: Z Q 5/8" IRON ROD }- 0 r,1 O \ W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20, FANNO CREEK ACRE LiJ U !n w C2 TRACTS AND RUNNING THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE > UJ W a NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY ~ 0 1 \ 5/8" IRON ROD LINE OF THE OREGON ELECTRIC RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG j UJ W PROPOSED PER W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP ( W W 100 YEAR ELEVATION CITY OF TAGARD SAID RAILROAD 362.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 69' S2' WEST A DISTANCE U) cc O W )- PER FEMA PANEL N0. CONCRETE OF 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD A I--- 0 F-- U, 410276-005 DATED gD€W ` DISTANCE OF 15.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82' S2' WEST 40.1 FEET TO A U \ Z Z o 3-1-82 POINT ON THE WEST UNE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 1042, WHICH POINT IS - o In m \ TAX LOT 800 , 2 w 0 CO '\ NORTH 0' 03' EAST 345.95 FEET AND NORTH 89' S2' EAST 387.2 FEET = ° PARCEL 3 6' MAPLE FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20, FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS; , Z = U Z TAX LOT 801 6"MAPLE•�'�0\ C A DISTANCED OF 89'45 95 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. 03' WEST (� W O a �� N89' S7' 11" E � ~ N ~ N. > EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 179 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO B. E. TORPAN, ('•59.26 �" ;o 5/8" IRON ROD ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 5, 1946 IN BOOK 255, PAGE 781. 0 U) Z CV S 00' 0 49" E 4, W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP z 5/8" IRON ROD 20.00 6 MAPLE �, 0 O I W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP• \ �Iv EXTRUDED CUR. �I 18.38 FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 5 FEET DEDICATED FOR W I "LAND TECH INC." \ I� ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE < 240.50 r_ .r. .a• STORM CB NO. 90-02165. < Z Q J� '� 20 4 ��'J!!T'�r 'l� TOP 99.47 - 0 _ i ��s•.mw�'l al • IE OUT■96.47 'L�i,!!�� ALSO EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE PARCELS I, II AND III THAT PORTION U7 I- N 89' 5T 11" E 442.k ,W, low 4 DEDICATED TO THE PUBUC FOR GREENWAY PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT / t6" CHERRY RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE NO. 90-02164, MORE 6'CHERR z6 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FANNO 5 '..-..-- PGE /7208 8' •ERRY w CREEK / Sf78q , 1 STREET UHTR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, BEING A PORTION OF THAT S 89' S7' 11" W TRACT OF LAND IN DEED TO PUGET DIE CASNG CO. AS RECORDED IN TAX LOT 900 60.00 / • I DEED BOOK 759, PAGE 22, AND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST PP ONE-QUARR OF SECON 12, TOSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TGARD, COUNTY OF R =13' 12' 00" WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON: R =136.40 _ 20 L =79.04 `LC =N 18' 45' 00" W � ` BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SW 77.94 -_ \' I Z BONITA ROAD, (COUNTY ROAD NO. 736) AS ESTABLISHED IN C.S. 20387, SAID POINT LOCATED FROM A BRASS CAP MARKING THE NORTH v ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 12, AND BEING SOUTH 00' 08' 27" C2 ==26' 30' S6' \'''''"----. u o--I-I WEST 1349.18 FEET ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER OF SECTION R 168.20 TOP OF BANK IN o I DIVISION UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF S.W. L =77.84 I 0 Z> BONITA ROAD, (30 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE LC =N 22' 05' 32" W O I < THEREOF); THENCE NORTH 89' 17' 05" EAST 56.34 FEET ALONG SAID 77.15 o Z RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE TO THE FANNO CREEK 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LINE / o o P1 AT AN ELEVATION OF 135.00 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID FLOOD PLAIN UNE SOUTH 04' 19' 11" WEST 5.74 FEET; C3 =0' 41' 11" / v THENCE SOUTH 34' 23' 02' WEST 25.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26' 12' R =136.40 e I I 34" WEST 27.80 FEET THENCE SOUTH 15' 52' 22" WEST 32.07 FEET; L =1.63 w THENCE SOUTH 07' 18' 16" WEST 26.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02' 15' LC =N 2' 29' 35" W 1 • ) 55' EAST 47.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00' 16' 23" EAST 42.90 FEET; I 1.63 I THENCE SOUTH 07' 50' 41" WEST 16.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54" 29' SCALE: 1" = 40' I / BALL I 01' WEST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18' 27' 20" WEST 11.90 FEET; CREEK THENCE SOUTH 04. 30' 32" EAST 18.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04' 45' S 0 20 40 80 I 17" WEST 23.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44' 12' 19" EAST 18.43 FEET; - - - - - - - I THENCE SOUTH 34' 13' 23" EAST 17.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60' 27' g g 02" EAST 10.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76' 24' 17" EAST 11.06 FEET; ■ • THENCE SOUTH 79' 50' 40" EAST 23.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84' 18' o 52" EAST 68.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87' 06' 37" EAST 30.05 FEET; \\---5/8- IRON ROD THENCE 64' 41' 39" EAST 20.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16' 49' 29" EAST W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 26.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11' 52' 05" EAST 26.55 FEET; THENCE LOT 20 "LAND TECH INC.' SOUTH 38' 52' 37" EAST 34.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10' 25' 26" EAST Z w 1 FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS 21.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27' 20' 33' EAST 25.68 FEET TO A POINT -Al ON A UNE 167.80 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE Q AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 759, PAGE 22; THENCE ALONG SAID UNE Y EASEMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTH 89' 46' 45" WEST 240.50 FEET TO THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER 0 0 G E N D A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, OF SECTION DIVISION LINE THROUGH SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 00' 08' 0 0 a TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON 27" EAST 455.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Q • CATCH BASIN COUNTY, OREGON BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 DOWN GUY ANCHOR THREE OF DOCUMENT NO. 97003555 DEED RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: NOTES: ICJ FIRE HYDRANT BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL THREE SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF S.W. 74TH AVENUE; 1. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS i e • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED THENCE SOUTH 89. 57' 11' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL COUNTY SURVEY 27,640. " POWER POLE THREE A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00' 02' 49' WEST 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 57' 11" EAST 59.26 FEET TO SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. DEA IS NOT : g THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A NON TANGENT, 136.40 FOOT RADIUS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES `o E a • WATER VALVE CURVE RIGHT ( THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02' 29' 35" EAST THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1.63 FEET) A DISTANCE OF 1.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02' 09' 00" EAST DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT. -OHP- OVERHEAD POWER 18.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.03 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT. "' EDGE OF PAVEMENT 7 , � 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON ODOT PROPOSED EASEMENT BEARINGS BASED ON SURVEY NUMBER 27640. BENCHMARK NO. Y672 1976, ELEVATION 198.84 FEET, ' S o a N.G.V.D. 29. �y1 0 o a r. . pp aptt (pip 4 y „ aasEEEeE � i�tbl!!! N 1 .`y L.nd•cap.Sp.cinutlo.w INTIIIPh N Imo CAPERAI gZI 1 tC6'$j (i'.i`i L •be don be God on•Ito pion by Raley/Mrlae 4dvt.cu Inc. All site pun �K ,tll S:9� rJ .'`\ - `..1 / dn....bd ea-Onion.balding dln..lon..and site develop*.andad o. S[F 9 • vein..prior to taull.tlpt pa raCa[apSR q♦y L l ` 102 Scapa w Wald : l fe'YSN nB J \ A)Kneel all atPl•la tow..qur■pmPt ang related tee...ay t0 ICCOapil.h.ell �I + t I. ' pr•p•ratIOt pucemw al.grading or topwu wet.W.placren and g.alrg or nii «SSVV rrr^, t t I� n'RK¢R1n:..AP"IpvAl at141(1/CtIOI ... p4ca.at or.p.oln.d plant amoral,/•..liars.•u1uno. and V./ • Y� 1'1 mat pretence NMte+artO pia.,N.clean.,dobrl.renewal 4d r.l•t.d iv . r,.c.•..s P.t.II per u cwpl.t.w nor/P o..n and spec ad abt0 a CO'dry em.1 low GEAR v.Rl ludo per..Yid Mabel pP label.r.ct..al Cod..•*Il a.algroerrood capon.cova.Mrrta l ..-..rI 444., IM Yet TTP. .rd restrlctlom and par an.rracturP raconmadationw✓P..ppllubl.. r' j • 11111 PACE Maur,200.0t1 en..43, 103 Want by A/a• Y+. . I A) Protect trees and shrub•P.It.durng cr0 1 11on by rancMg ores 4,0,4' . 7.2.COO•TA/a6•PANED DAR[ temporary orange poly fond PP davit?.for lo••P nJtry see(30r.D). I M.oe.nJ peat erArcca rC eu.tc+exr D) The site to be cleared and gteb.d of all v set pre I,paving,gavel base and SUIT v D!1'rw TO ar'•1TIar IWISALL of a debris not to rental, *dd.d..are to be we prior to snd.up....Pon ndr o . dr crow Al NJR.Rr.e ar C) Srcgra0.•to be provided alt.JO root par Wt.g.dg pit ano par MraSC.r[a1OaRCr _ _�... III ri•.teO.t tGPeOl.w+r.cwAOel Cr)C.2G�I Pap Noma t *.provided topsoil.nil cbb•.ap4O d a Mee.Or I0'ac. ..��- LYt��_ /y so.de ' ` �:��, - ^-, I/'I' 2•�� 104 a LeOwb; CE ItG L17 MUD •.I`,• _�/�r a Tlr Lrd•up•GPnr.c u Mull b.rasps.ilia IP w prot.cuw or aa�.ux .. i/. _ pgropaty,a4trg plant atPlal drlgrrt.d rP presPV•uon,and w.aresy of w WW_ ;;:•x;:.t+: . B The Lano•uW Contractor Mil be r•.pawlbr for CoOd.etXg N•rat tdth all 8 io , • NOLL TOM N O PadA.Abler IR t PALL mho trades a•*roan I•' - —acoa r isant:r.ND Mcaa P rota a CJ win..The ewacop.Contractor Pall call w IYdPgw/d Utilities Locator a . ' O `,•_ I S b.OVaJ.rrAcre0 rl?nave.K r.LOU Saran(I-eo0•C4-S»S1 prior to conwrea g wont w Pell bo held r•.pon.rol.rP ; 1 i g li 0 0 S I _..�.-�_ p wRiT rorAC'C1 Ara IWL'enm•+ p,.t+c+b+or.and dry dan.ge to.a., unit.and*tr.... w Pau verify w ,� 1- I I leutbr er NIUtN. Nh w Ca.tPal CPnr.Gter. ' _ 1 G MS vainutbn or Exl.tino Condition* 111 O% don.. v Og 1�to.GGat•o.o�Y .O.i g.c d•'I a land•.J a O.� In a es4l•g condition.. Irtcludwg .a. ..arawcta Dowd any errorn or conflict/ !a - n Pawng.P.p.,Jfcatla occur,w Landscape Contractor Pan notify the IG.-i _Jx-' •:,.L •, ::: TREE PLANTING/STAKING „�,.n�+.,,�ap '�y'uw regarding.II Mt.deg..«d.n�nat... crr- I ...' 11 i 31313 rutERIA,LS W. 701 Want_.tP11i Pan canons to 4aIGan AagG.tbn o t,a,' 'P gad..and j -. ---� standard*a p,101V.d in the•4.PICM S{Ndard for Na.Py Node and a.noted on OZ i -' v I1 .� 1 Q 111 a Tres to b..elr-.tppo ti g..Ith MWl had•and Isadore Pact. d' /t 1 }{`,n tJ `. 1•' % ,- ` r4 (•\ fr DO*uan PIN Dew All Wd. tact d grovel.Patio-vvw v... I sd bury. All v...to be Dralga N C DaMer Wale. K , �, .� `'� ' t and rta'eol wrlr a C) Plant notarial..y b.rejected n any uo.by w Land.up.4wuct d�..to S-- U) •�vv .� n \ 1 cononloa.,ram.o- damage.barons a•.her planting. W V i� '•Jt�.,� ` \ . ' -`_ .se NATM�eua/r w A cad awe...'.twonry toped'an(2A lop r l/3 Coeur fro.,.oo.po•t.d.old,)P Z I. %-'v' s \ . n w �rp..» .�. r na Or J2 roast W 5 N t`r� .c.',...-/4 C �I _-• FF'n A) bandy ads•4ta 1L he.of rock and dePl.der 7'n planate. ?<n • I? I.l_� rf ~ -. s��.,^i„ii..,i' A 204 Match Cedar Gova conpoat.d sold+P approved.rjW L O O1 V.-... I�1 ',` .,,,�4 WGNIr SIOrTOt MD aDN 0 wLt[ -tl •<,s / ".y�.:'< Pa001LL MATERIAL M NATI* 205 FPtllliee •� (X ill .. Ian h.1. . -X MATIRIAL.N MOO..RIMY Z .`j .<-\,,..?'' �f ,t �` = C.IPACTED Al.WATO=N �� eeq.Yl Webfoot Jrp.tan Tranwp4nte as AWN/.Cttrad be Lilly MIIIP.P 0O 0 ' _:- - IGAMMr 400 LOO.at Moor rube e) Aaoeou 0 approved equal. Z m R' • 1\ ---,-- = at Cando.ISMERIAL 26 Erwlon Control Notting Q 3 Z ^+�� A)L.ndbk 4oTCR/4c lGT O.g.d.b4 Paola control bIO.t(P approved equal./ Q/0 Q I \ Raw d pobpropylet..rant Imu11 .IwWact,rar reco•Raeatlal. 0 1 SHRUB/GROUND COVER PLANTING 300 E12ama4 Oo I ILIA 301 Soil Prewr.Ua, ti I- Q'IA O Ce A) n all plantar 0.0.surly to•depth or 5 Per and apply a.Prrl or 3 Wawa V Q m El d y 1 (after compaction/or•peclrl.d.Mall and renovate Into Or to S no.or w l w Tla[PAlaha RX�IMW megade Rowan.•a drone r,d rod over 2'. • :� 302 Rough Cs...tined.,All.r...Pall be rough graded wnl.n)C root barone plantng. i_ - All wades Pan dodos pooruv drainage•way from balding ang urough•all puny • .."� are.to avoid low spots and caroling art,. Ares.Pall be graded Pea,wt nun. Q — /\\al- gad•.meet and blare naturally with w dietig wades. A ropes grater Van 2A. d 8 • •• • wan P0•loa control netting par ndYlacWea r.,Pwd.tlaw. rte.. PLANT LEGEND V�J� 303 Mang,g yng and.uao r►e e.un..d..folio./ ark Eeo we Al Plant Pity owing.mar oI locally.cc.pt.d practice. (/) y.W D) Gel or plant Pall be Mlgrtly Mga..her, *al van adJ•can*oil (Yr[^.'.Jr►`I $7MBOL BOTANICAL/CGf°TTGN NAME DT) SfZE REMARKS a Lay.*all err plan..par.tall and aim.•M: clearance roe car overhang -r.-+ C N erne new paving. .114,ct.b..no prooPty IInes. a� o) Dareoot teem*hall b.planted on b.t,...l November eth.no Harty,15th And C N �/L ;Lan or.ungard hortlonIt,al proctica.. 0 N N y ED E1 Portal.all pawing.la.'Transplanter.pr antraci Per•.paclncatlal. m doer platanoldsa 'Geld.ace' 3 I-Ir1" Brand Ting.tertie rap-ter as pantng•Pth•Orocdte retIriw par mwr.cwrP'•.p.clnuuo r. cn et 8'from curb TYPICAL GROUND COVER SPACING P) n.LA d.rap•4detact Pau.pevlee pnn.g of trees•d M.LT. Lon pnnng 3 O A tow*nova!W atpred taiga ano bre..4,4•.°brawl..dnect.d. All Xrjured I O tree Poets to be awed vertically aid•sharp Lana Para.planttg. (/) Va 304 r4ld+rnq ThJJa plicate/We•tehl Red;Pear 1 5'•b' PatrNaR.ac :•.m.L,..„ In. A) Prnvt r(.for canpaatlen)Wye.a.PAW to all punter bad.. rr.r.a mV+ or.uW.t vat.a rhadoda,Pam DO•sa4a•to W old-hry Xryt L new DRAPE w 305 • lean OWn-up sr� '� a 0 Pay-L.•4V.Y.Lt.tp \`\�� .a•eot.Y recr2D .0 Clean all p0M'9 area.and Ml.h rasa canon 0410•I b IIdO .no paving of C T Pine aOntortd/Shona Purr . 5'-b' 4irl 303 that w affected by 4nrd.cap•wul4UOn. 9E .- = i \�-+r-a-._ werw.�.�a 306 Plant Proud r f- _yy A) Protect•II plant auto,arrg varwpat and a.n.,against ham nom won. 1 ueatal.beta, and w p1blic In•ccadanco with acO..pt.d rRtlyhtr•I practica Special p0nt•g teamlcT.r•.0.101)1)09..Itproorl a.Payml.tlg 0)bo repaired for to all planing stn -._.t.z- 51 'p.Contract.I.11104 rm.d..rg.or l..P injury to dieting bem And 10 Arbutus tr+edo/Strawberry Tree 5 5 gel. 21'-24'tall .hr,aa.re.w11•g Rw w Oat,aOtar'•failure u prat.et thee The Jut value to le 3 O BED EDGE AT PAVING for by w v.IWUoh or Land.up.Ti....errata and other Plods.Carew 10 Pr.*'.'Otto Luyhsl'/Otto Luyka,Laurel 12 18"-21" 1546 tarty 40)C - Q Q 460 MaMrDiM)CE ( C�` A01 The Lad.o p.Contract.Pall be respowb4 Arlg w contract peed/P • .oepwtg all planting.are wort ncaa 11 a..or 0 good Co cntl0l 0y renewing.plant _ �j/ r.plau.at..atPng.wl.dng,0rltivnNLy prang,swaying,regtying and ova Ju'P 'h TLlltOnl'/glue Carpet kr/par eat. 36'OG rrrw.any openlaw or care'Or w promotion or root wow ono pet Iv.. .1-0-o•p•Contractor.111 pe-rom aoo*antaanca dtnles n an rw•capa arw.onll • conditional acc.pt100e by w Landscape 4aatoot and Amt. 407.a0..lo..ak.end all ova paved vers..Pall be:rot clan Pan pawing NO ma Aurae opeatia.Sr.n prow... 500 44004HTT 1. 3131 Warranty atala4 and tronairaneap/a old y.1'00.data or conditional W acceptor.. Landscape Carv.etdr Pall not be held•..eaab4/or damage r..t)trg O • Iron e.G.•410.clnrtolglul 0010/110/a wet Pi aUP contractors.b4 evil be (3 r.wa rOi.10.I0wg or vandall40 aVla4 all/w proJan l•cadltloally J 4' O accepted by We L.no•upa 40.uct and Oenr. E V I t'V I tag g NOTES: IC 1 3, 441L TOPSOIL REMOVED FlMJrT TtE*APACE M PIEPARAT04 POOR G10AOMCa AND U CP6TRIJCTIOO IS TO DE STOWED al OR NEAR TE ME AND PROTECTED PR01 I PMOJ.• EROSION BOLE GRADING OPERATION*ARE JCEIe)Ar.ASO 11U04 STOR.AG&MAT NOT DE LOCATED i4€0.IT 1RO1LD CAJSE 0100047IGN OP ROOT$7$TET15 car TREES NTENDED'O DE PRESERVm,AND AFTER Car1PLET100 a SUCM GRADMG. 71C repeOIL ID TO DE RESTORED TO EXPOSED OJT Arm PILL ETISAM'INrS OR I LMOSCAP!PtAM J I (t) BUILDING PADS TO PROVIDE A SUITABLE D4.E POR SEEDING AND PLANTPra A 30 vlSuAL C EAR:0 E MANGLE*WALL DE MANTA.='ET1DEN ACCESS ORRVEWAT AND ADJACENT STREET 115111.014 AVDaE). LaCCA ind M TNIS AREA 01u1).NOT DE TALLER 7141 3'MCP TOP CP CJIm. EJr15TING TREES M TAM AREA NIGNER T1AN 3'6N4LL BE PRIED 60 TWAT ALL DRANCNE5 DELOW1 e' LANDSCAPE PLAN Ms DoEl�ED5aT1"T4*DEALCLEAENCE Ll iJ SCALE:ur.r•0' CF SHEETS 1 rFM•im1 _ psi i.z 4e__ SW 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION //� /DO WASHINGTON COUN vo SCALE I"= rs 00 S.W.. BONITA 97-IOIS30 rs 90-2163 -r- r- 95-52199 56.34 T 3.93 351 55 �1 0‘53Z 5�' �0 40 c;:'," :S 27.80 600 I ml A� 1 300 32.07 /.67Ac. I aI a� 500 ` 2.09AC. N• 500-AI 300-AI 33 AC. I 26.38 _ p o L _ 117.65'_ J N j1 m 47.41 °' '3'- o -4 y r m .1 42.90 y ° D X n I. 424.50' h 16.70 381.40' g 700 N 89°52' E 0 m 11.90 .86 Ac. ° 18.97 cn 5 mo -0'- m 23.43 y 0 400 O_ m N w m 18.43 S 89° 52'W ° a .84 AC. 387.20' 5.47 �' O 4+ I�ez 429.70' o '°400-MI tO O r co N' 68.27 30.05�e6 800 N 8 O I 26.87 .96 Ac. w .83 Ac.. 26.85 -- m° T / \ °r m 20 34.43 *> .0 GREENWAY \C� STA.4+65 4 ?� 21.1 240.50 25.68 A rr- O 73 900 • 2.82AC. N 41 N ________' 140' * 138.14 MAP 1000 I2BD .43 AC. tr N 1000'M I cp 0.nzo A • 47,77%,=///.77,,%)"""'%i;7,7/%^'-7-... 520 ,- -�., 171.21' 15.72 490.24' "'''''''''",,,z..e:/.77.72"):71." ./.'4,-..'5,7-•. �'.;c--"o'7) 1316.06 40' 141.21' 1( 0 S89°49'20"W 30' Z 1100 N /.64 4c. • °' 452.93 .Q F r\ J\J JN� J 20 W � n co 21 N c 1200 A A w to 2.634C An N 496.75' m 23- 74 i City of Tigard Wetlands December 1994 Unit 8 Lower Fanno Creek and Lower Ball Creek Unit 8, Lower Fanno Creek, is located in the southeast corner of the study area south of S.W. Bonita Rd. south to the Oregon Electric Railroad line. It includes lower Fanno Creek and a portion of Ball creek between Interstate 5 and its confluence with Fanno Creek. All wetland sites with the exception of G15 are adjacent to the stream corridors. Unit 8 contains approximately 40 acres of wetlands including 25 acres of forest, 12.5 acres of emergent, and 2.5 acres of open water. The width of the wetland corridor adjacent to Fanno Creek is generally broad up to 600 feet wide. Ball Creek contains a much narrower, highly disturbed wetland corridor. Fanno Creek flows south beneath S.W. Durham Rd. and beyond the Unified Sewerage Agency's treatment plant to the Tualatin River. It separates residential and agricultural land use on the west from agricultural and industrial uses to the east. This reach of Fanno Creek may have the greatest development pressure within the City due to the available open space and industrial zoning. As development occurs it is essential that adequate buffers are maintained to separate distinct land uses and protect wildlife habitat from industrial disturbance. If wetlands are adversely impacted by development, wetland mitigation is required by state and federal laws. Wetland mitigation should be prioritized to occur in the flood plain in agricultural areas, if possible, to avoid impacts to forested areas. Wetland creation in the flood plain can benefit several wetland functional values including wildlife habitat, fish habitat, water quality, hydrologic control, and aesthetic quality. Abundant uplands occur adjacent to most of the wetland sites in this unit. These uplands include pastures and forests and provide wildlife habitat and natural buffers between stream and future development. A minimum 50 ft wide buffer should be preserved; wider buffers should be preserved where development can be concentrated adjacent to S.W. 74th Ave. Fishman Environmental Services page 35 - _ CITY OF TIGARD \: 1 _ - -'` - „�, '--\ _ Wetlands Inventory C� D r \ X41/■ Tl••_ II,F1•1, No 11111■ ' I' ” ■∎ � - 0 Identified Wetlands al ■ !!w &: -a �. ,T \ I 1 m Streams il, ■■■ I o -II II �� ; ; ; —F— - ___ _ .1 Public Land Survey .uwwCNA' �� TT _ Z 4 3 Section IDs ra o fil - K - PARKar 1 _I a�/g ! I -- Resource Unit Boundary �-■-■/ .IIIII - I - G-8 ; — • Sample Plot Location • llama :,.s RI 1 ` Source: Scientific Resources Inc. and ' Fishman Environmental Services. Aerial - 1 ■ �; •l photography from April, 1994 at a 12 III _ - - nominal scale of 1" 400' .ru 111.41110!mu.,J1_ / 111 '°°• •. bin LN Di l!1l1111111D�:" 11 1i/i `�� Information on this map is of a it };47II =� ■ �G10 generalized nature. In all II iiiiIIif % %N% field conditions determine wetland A .. 111 ' boundaries.� -', ,' KA9LELN Public Land Survey Information: All � �,,,,,, „ ,., :::: 1 ; ; ! ;1!d11 ■fir – g� 0 T1SR1W or T2SR1W.„� , ,;, � �,,,�; i\ J 1 y Index Map\ '' IMO MO.4„ rokdol;in ,:s_.:. ...v.s.i.,,u17=-. rem lij 1 II li / . ►�//■ pP”' :CIS! 1 4i C 11111111111 _/I1 , ap0P11!!!! • ,� m• 11111Per N�• ■.. ■ 12 �7 ' �' i 13 7 � i 4 r 6 t -� f / \ 1 r.""r / 1 _ Yr /� I � / od , lar,,A1...... . 1 1 ,„_14... , , ,... :, ,z_. \.,\ /frcitc. ,00, \ , _ ,. .. _ iati, 8 (4111:7--- 1 i 1 ,M911 (1 %.,........„, Scale 1” = 700 feet "" . .. ..--„,„ Plot Date: 09/23/96 N %Ii ;i;i!!! Ty v AT&T f r AT&T Broadband & Internet Services søiI A 741h-BONITA 8. z GENERAL NOTES GIN/ Al RIcwi w•ir 8 DC NOT SCAI_E DRAWINGS. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FIELD LOCATIONS FOR ALL UTILITIES WITHIN r. 1. THE PROJECT MANUAL AND/OR SPECIRCAT'.ONS SHALL DE A PART OF THESE THE VICINITY CF CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO DIGGING OR GRADING. Pa \\141.... DRAWINGS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO LEVEL EXISTING GRADE WITHIN AREA CF EASEMENT AND 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS OR IN THE PROJECT ENSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE AND ADJACENT PROPERTY. o. MANUAL AND SPECIFICATIONS AS BEING N.I.C.OR EXISTING,ALL ITEMS 6. RERLAE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SHOULD PIE COLLECTED N AN ORDERLY N MATERIALS,ETC.AND INSTALLATION OF THE SAME ARE A PART CF THE FASHION AND REMOVED FROM TI4E SITE IN THE SAME MANNER CARE POST BE Q C P. ONTRACT C='O:NED BY THESE DRALUNG8 AND SPECIFICATIONS. TAKEN TO KEEP AREAS MOUND BUILDINGS FREE Of DEBRIS CONTRACTOR IS ANY ERROR',AMBIGUITIES AND/OR OMISSIONS N THE DRAWINGS OR THE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO 917E CREATED BT HIS WORK AND SHALL NE g SPECIFICATI.'+N5 Su4LL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATFI Y N MAKE ANY REPAIRS AS REQUIRED. WRITING. 1. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE CF EASEMENT BOUNDARY UPON ¢ 1 COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. QZ 4. PRIOR TO TH_SUBMISSION OF BIDS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE 4ND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD CONDITIONS 4Np DIMEN61ON8,AND y O CONFIRMING THAT THE LLIORUC MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING h1/GMANICAL 4 /CAL — THE OON5TF':+.1CTION.ANT DISCREPANCIES ARE TO 6E BROIY UT TO THE ATTENTION I. SEAL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED AREAS WITH UL LISTED AND FIRE Z ¢ 8 1 OF THE IMPLF'1ENTATION ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING CODE APPROVED MATERIALS. L CL WITH WORK. S. SOLELY AS A CONVENIENCE TO THE OWNER MUD CONTRACTOR,THE ARCHITECT 1. PROVIDE UL APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE U G MAY INCLUru DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CERTAIN CONSULTANTS AND/OR MARSHAL.VERIFY LOCATIONS O ORE EXTINGUISHERS WITH ARCHITECT AND _ VENDORS<GR INCORPORATE THE RECOMMENDATIONS CF SAD CONSULTANTS FIRE MARSHAL.PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION.IF REQUIRED BY LOCAL • AND/OR VENDORS INTO DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT/WITHIN AUTHORITIES, CONSTRUCTION GCNSTRUCTIO THE SET OF'.+OCUIENTS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT.IT 19 EXPRESSLY 3. PROVIDE TRENCHES/SORES TO ALLOW IINDERiROWD CONDUIT CF 14'TRANSITIONS TO UNDERSTOO(•THAT BY SUCH ISSUANCE,THE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO LIABILITY 60'BURIAL DEPTH ON SPECIFIED LOCATION. REFILL TRENCH PER ARCHITECT'S FOR THE SEF'VICES FOR SAID CONSULTANTS MID/OR VENDOR. INSTRUCTIONS. MAINTAIN 11'SPACING BETWEEN COMMUNICATION AND POWER CONDUITS. ..r , \ ' - 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR 4. TRANSITION TO PVC COATED Rib SWEEP'S TO EXIT FROM BELOW GRADE AT BUILDING. ALL BUILD!:i DEPARTMENT REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 5, COORDINATE CAREFULLY WITH LOCAL UTILITIES TO INSTALL NEW UTILITY � • 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANT TRANSFORMER AND METER f EXCAVATIC SITE WORK OR CONSTRUCTION 6. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR EXACT NUMBER SIZE AND ROUTE OF COMMUNICATION 6 %� S. GENERAL Cc NTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OOORDINAT NG ALL CONDUITS. �-. I, WORK INCLU'ING ADDITIONAL PERMITS AND COORDINATION OF 1, COI`INICATION CONDUITS BELOW EASEMENT ROAD SHALL Be CONCRETE ENCASED. a CA i I - SUBCONTRACTORS. a_+ CSVV Tr 1 1 S. THE ARCHITF:T SN4LL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBT4INNG AND PAYING FOR C r 6- w ALL PERMIT',LICENSES,INSPECTIONS,ANC TESTING NDICATED ON THE PLANS �O > AND/OR BY SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR RVYUIRED BY ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY. CC O IC. CONTRACTOR SHALL OIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, I O ORDINANCE: RULES,REGULATIONS AND ORDERS CO ANY PERTNENT PUBLIC AUTHORITY SEEING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF TIE WORK. ^ Y to �..�I IL ALL RORC AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST ADOPTED ICI EDITION OF,1E UNIFORM BUILDING LADE AS AMENDED.ALL ORDINANCES,THE ti I- GI REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OR COUNTY WITH JURISDICTION,AND SPECIAL i. - "----"--- REQUIIREMEN 6 INDICATED N THE BUILDING SUMMARY OR THESE GENERAL LOCATION M14P NOrE6 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE IN WRITING,AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED N-5 BEFORE STA7!,'NG WORK ON ANY ITEMS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR /�B G RE\/f /�T I ONS IN?c IDENTIFIED DT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ^ YF7 Y 111 r/ 13. LOCAL COI!RN NG AUTHORITIES SHALL G BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION Cr CONDITIONS OR E 5 THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING CANC CONCRETE 14. MINOR MOD/=ICATIONS ON DETAILS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB SITE EXIST EXISTING T. DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS,AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAX MAXIMUM IF PART CC Tut,:WORK MIN MINIMUM i 15. ALL WORDS SHALL DE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE UDC ✓$ REGARDINJ EARTHQUAKE PIPING,LIGHTING FIXTURES AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. NEC NATIONAL BUILDING CODE • • ALL WORKS MUST DE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL EARTHQUAKE CODES AND NO NOT IN CONTRACT REGULATIO'1;' NTS NOT TO SCALE 16. ALL SIGNAGE IN NOT A PART OF TH6 CONTRACT.SIGN CONTRACTOR TO THK THICK OBTAIN SEPARATE APPROVALS AND PERMITS FROM GOVERNING AGENCIES a FOR SIGNS.. UDC UNFORM BUILNG CODE 1. AT COMPLETION O PROJECT,NEW SPACES SHALL DE CLEED AND N WORKING CF-DER PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. U SHEET INDEX f w t ____ N,.uowc a 2 aI I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ALL CONDITIONS AT �{ �, �{�T DtOf�RPTION JOB SITE INC",UDING BUILDING AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING 0 [Z]• WORK AND. ALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SATE. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL COVER SHEET/TN�9 9uEETr ,5-- M /C�4] DE REPO!"SD TO NE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THE PLOT OF THE SURVEY DRALNG AND L5 LAND SURVEY U SURVEYOR'S MARKINGS AT THE SITE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUE NORTH. Al EASEMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN PROJ.• PIRDJJ'IGR T IF ANY DISCREPANCY 16 FOND BETWEEN THE SURVEY DRAWING AND SURVEYOR'S A2 DETAILS 9eK� DDV MARKINGS,1HE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASE_ME SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT. El ELECTRICAL PLANE,DIAGRAMS■DETAILS E-5 EET 1 3 COE COND:.SHALL ASSUME SOLE WITH 4 A COMPLETE REGULATIONS REs RlC JOB \ 917E ECU/ ".O FOR wO COMPLY AND 84FETT REPROTECTI AND RESTRICTIONS CO REQLR..,FOR WO T ON O AND PPROJECT. OvI PROTECTION DURING THE GEQUI E OF..ONSTRUGTI AN OF THIS PROJECT.PROVIDE PROTECTION HI ADJACENT JOB SITE.ANY DAMAGE E EXISTING HE CONTRACTOR ACTJ WITHIN L CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND �YJW'1� ADJACENT'.,;JOB SITE. MAGE DAMAGE OCCURS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. T1 REPAIR OF.r+EPLACE DAMAGED AREA AND/OR MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BHALL OWNER:APPROVAL AT NO 4DDTIONAL COST.THIS REQJIREM ENT SHALL RELOCATE AS REQUIRED. ]7Y APPLY CO.•;NJOUBLY AND NOT DE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS O. 9;-iEE?5 45,D, ( I 6/SL CIDO oo0�6 4 5/8"IRON ROO LEGAL DESCRIPTION-PARENT PARCELL W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 5 "IRON ROO /19.80 80 32 0'3 W W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP PARCEL III: " „\............J/ r j31:5 A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH. RANGE 1 WEST. N 89'32'30'W OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF I 2 367.45 WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED Z 3 C 25 AS FOLLOWS: 5/8"IRON ROD I- 0\ W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20,FANNO CREEK ACRE W W W C2 TRACTS AND RUNNING THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF NE I 4 NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 20 TO A POINT ON NE WESTERLY IC W co 3' - 8 5/8' IRON ROD W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LINE OF THE OREGON ELECTRIC RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG 0 W LL 1 PROPOSED PER SAID RAILROAD 362.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'52• WEST A DISTANCE 0 EE O W w 100 YEAR ELEVATION ,,,,,,Inn TAGARD OF 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD A III a C7 f PER FEMA PANEL NO. CONCRETE DISTANCE OF 15.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82'52'NEST 40.1 FEET TO A (1� CO r Z ? M� 410276-005 DATED CONCRET Q POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 1042, WHICH POINT IS G c r 3-1-82 TAX LOT 800 '� \ NORTH 0'03'EAST 345.95 FEET AND NORTH 89'52'EAST 387.2 FEET = W iO 6'MAPLE a FROM NE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 20,FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS; ~ Z S b " \ PARCEL 3 z \ . a"MAPLE 0 ®\ C3 THENCE SOUTH 89'52'WEST 387.2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0'03'WEST 41 ^ LU > TAX LOT 801 \ \ O A DISTANCE OU 345.95 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGNHING. Q h F I \ J� N!Y'67 1Y E ,�r EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 179 FEET 7HEREOF CONVEYED TO B.E. TORPAN, v • Z N C 8Y.Z8 a; ::6.2"5111RON ROD ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 5,1946 IN BOOK 255, PAGE 781, O s 49'E / YELLOw Pusnc cAP d y c a5/8"IRON ROD ,, 7 MOO �' MAC ��r� FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 5 FEET DEDICATED FOR 0 I- S W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP' ` '�6 ExTRUOEO CuR: r '(' ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE F W V "LAND TECH INC." \`� o A STORM C8 NO. 90-02165. M Z 240_50 _ IL �' 20 4 '=off�+ r TOPN99.47 H 3 N 89'57'11•E .442. - JWI� Er'��y{1=i� �.o IE ouT 9W 47 ALSO EXCEPTING FROM NE ABOVE PARCELS I,II AND III THAT PORTION fA / Is'tRERRY��'4�F �II DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR GREENWAY PURPOSES BY DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 15, 1990 AS FEE NO. 90-02164, MORE / 6'°ERR 2s' P/X/72� PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FANNO • e'• a.Y W/IRANSFORMER CREEK / �';� t t STREET UCHT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,BEING A PORTION OF THAT S ww wr 11'w TRACT OF LAND IN DEED TO PUGET DIE CASTING CO. AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 759.PAGE 22. AND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST TAX LOT 900 L �U) I I ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH,RANGE 1 WEST, OF C1 =33'12' O(i' / / ' THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN.IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON: R 4 \ 20 _ L.79.04 • 1 `�_�� BEGINNING Al A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SW ';� LC =N 18'45'00" W �� \ I z sn BONITA ROAD, (COUNTY ROAD NO. 736) AS ESTABUSHED IN C.S. 20387. IliIil I ( 4 77.94 \ Z� SAID POINT LOCATED FROM A BRASS CAP MARKING THE NORTH I D \. I V ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 12.AND BEING SOUTH 00'08' 27' : _ 4 In 814 WEST 1349.18 FEET ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER OF SECTION I C2 A=26'30' 56" I .! 1 R =168.20 \��TOP OF BANK - ( AT 6-- DIVISION UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON-THE-SOUTH LINE OF S.W: 0 4 L=77.84 I z>> BONITA ROAD,(30 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER UNE W S LC =N 22'05'32"W S I G T THEREOF); THENCE NORTH 89'17 05"EAST 56.34 FEET ALONG SAID Z< C 77.15 QQ Z RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE TO THE FANNO CREEK 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN UNE <-. L `4 Q C AT AN ELEVATION OF 135.00 FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL; THENCE : Ivy FOLLOWING SAID FLOOD PLAIN LINE SOUTH 04'19'11'WEST 5.74 FEET; W • C3 /1.0"41'11' THENCE SOUTH 34'23'02"WEST 25.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26'12' A K • R.138,40 I iR 34' WEST 27.60 FEET THENCE SOUTH 15'52' 22"WEST 32.07 FEET: ;q K L-1.63 / / 1O THENCE SOUTH or 18' 16"WEST 28.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'15' Q Z a LC.N 2'29'35`W 55' EAST 47.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'16'23 EAST 42.90 FEET; q Q e I 1.63 1` I I THENCE SOUTH 07.50'41'WEST 16.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54'29'/ SCALE: 1" 40' 1 ' ./ ✓ `BALL I 01'WEST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18'27'20"WEST 11.90 FEET; s 0 20 40 80 CREEK THENCE SOUTH 04'30'32"EAST 18.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04'45' I 17" WEST 23.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44'12' 19"EAST 16.43 FEET; {� THENCE SOUTH 34'13'23"EAST 17.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60'27' C 8 02"EAST 10.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76'24' 1r EAST 11.06 FEET; k" 3 n _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ THENCE SOUTH 79'50'40•EAST 23.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84'18' S S 52"EAST 68.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87'06'37"EAST 30.05 FEET; 6 5/8"IRON ROD THENCE 64'41'39"EAST 20.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18'49'29"EAST A d I W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 26.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11'52'05"EAST 26.55 FEET; THENCE < LOT 20 "LAND TECH INC." SOUTH 38'52'37'EAST 34.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10'25'26"EAST € I i 21.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2r 20'33"EAST 25.68 FEET TO A POINT o FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS ON A UNE 167.80 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH UNE AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 759,PAGE 22; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 8 W a EASEMENT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SECTION DIVISION LINE THROUGH SECTION THE THENCE NORTH-SOUTH CENTER 08' R LEGEND A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, 27•EAST 455.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON ■ CATCH BASIN COUNTY. OREGON BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 44 y DOt•N GUY ANCHOR THREE OF DOCUMENT NO. 97003555 DEED RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: NOTES: FIRE HYDRANT BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL THREE SAID CORNER g ALSO BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF S.W. 74TH AVENUE; 1. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS 7 • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED THENCE SOUTH 89"57'11"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL COUNTY SURVEY 27,640. THREE A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'02'49"NEST 20.00 e POWER POLE 2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. DEA IS NOT i FEET; THENCE EASTH 89'LO G EAST TANG FEET 6. SAID FOOT RADIUS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A NON TANGENT, 136.40 F00T RADIUS 8 ' 8 • WATER VALVE CURVE RIGHT( NE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02'29'35"EAST NAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1.63 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 1.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'09'00"EAST DISCLOSED BY A n11F REPORT. -OHP-OVERHEAD POWER 18,38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.03 ACRES MORE OR G 3. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT. • IOU EDGE OF PAVEMENT LESS. o r' BEARINGS BASED ON SURVEY NUMBER 27640. 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED ON ODOT : 6 • I tar N ---------PROPOSED EASEMENT BENCHMARK NO. Y672 1976, ELEVATION 198.84 FEET, GG V 4 a- N.G.V.D. 29. I ma 5 21 dg 111:Tsii ro R •Y �n 4 ilillili:illitiiii\� b i r ;' it #4.,'. C EXISTING DRfYE11)AY'. f l i' *.' ° - • 12t" y\'f 1 I • f --n \/ 100 YEAR ELEVATION PER FEMA PANEL N0. \ 410276-005 DATED \ \ VI 3—t-82 v \ v ... - .' .. \ � , EXIS?LNG I1 y� � I � DRIVEWA , 1\\ .. 1 Fili g I. �, _ -� •I 197'-0'9ET6ACK _ •\ \ I ? I�l lr \-O'er- \ ' \~ ` • I•r�� :1_ 4'4I• 4 ` I CHAIN PPR LINO FENCE 4'-6' 9 I , \ '-!�\ _ A • .. 7I Q ce T. :—t:r---x --rx—xmax.—x,—x—x � �x—x x—x x •__ / Q �.11 SLIDING GATE �� / / rrl g - I SEE/AZ FOR DETAIL F X /�/, 11 Q y # 1 I FANNO S g0. ,� ... �) I h CREEK I \ W O ` % N � EASEMENT F n a X Or ' — �_ u Q b I .. \ AREA 5 / !_ 1 }// I'` o IT .? ,II • I \ I X g x. ammo ; I pp� au 4 I I ioli� i FUTi RE NUD I \PANCMI6 YOM 1*T a-b I `b. I b + GeT'ILS\ IlNOT N CONTRACT.{ m x. :. [\—' 3'MIN GRAVEL • X I \ \ \\ \ $EE NOTE 4DRIC i t �_..._:_ .... CA 1 I �::\)\—` .1 I x —TOP OF BANK I +�' N RI. /` I I m 3 .. in m • Q x--x--- zx—..- -. x_x x—x—�x—x—x—x—X—x—x—x—x �� -. 1 .- m je '...R 41 I r-- 1 i— b lio .�' 1 O '. / BALL 1 E } EXISTING TREES 0 CREEK i ; Q TO EE RETANED :. R$ I ■ r i i I -1 K U > 1 iti if w fl F'ROJ.• F'RWriSR I& 99KD1 DOV 1 EASEMEV-PLAN J NOTES: NOTES: 1. CLEAR vEGETATICN WITNIN EASEMENT AREA. ,:27.. ', Al 1 �`, EASEMENT PL14N DO NOT DISTURB VEGETATION OUTSIDE a SITE PLAN LAYOUT 15 DETAILED AT DO NOT D TURB DRAWING NO.2/AI (/\J SCALE I/4'•I'-m' 7_SET FENCE 6'INSIDE EASEMENT UN.° I SCALE.In6'•I'-0' 3.SEE El FOR TRENCNNG REQUIREMENTS. GP SHEETS ®' if--- 10'_0'TYPICAL PANEL _12'-0'CLEAR GATE OPENING 6'-®'__� a Ar f - -- SLIDING GATE PER MFR SPECIFI'ATIONS ` $ /0!!1: FINISH GRAVEL,4'TO 6'CF 5/8'x1,4' TOP RAIL 7$ie f refill CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK W/NO FINES 0 g I 4'MIN THICKNESS I 3.,S%SLOPE 25%SLOPE ■3i•i4 ii••i►iiiiiiiiiiiiiS•i'iiiiii'i'iiiii �ii 1451111i ll I'lp III• 1 11 X MI AMR i _ 1 TO SERVICE I UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND v ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT ! :::M U U T UULT/ 2 TINNED COPPER WIRE POWER POLE I U - a BELOW GRADE ITYP) I I I °'> IOk3/4'ROD(TYP) 87 GONTRAC OR 1 STAINLESS STEEL SEAL ENTRANCE C+ FROM RAN � /\./ 11 i UTILITY TRENCH © I BURIAL MINIMUM DEPTH 46:k . .4:s4 I I I ALONG EASEMENT \ I IEEE 3/42 FOR DETAIL) I HUB I i ROUND io O Q 1 I I FUTURE C.UE. �y 1 Do- NMI 1 0 I n 1 GROUND LEVEL ' } 1 III-�I PE:II'`11=1F'IIK 0 71==I1:1.=11.117 1 W i l21. TO TGI F.1B �9 I 4 NOTES NOTE 1 LOCATE RODS NEAR BLDG CORNERS, MN 3'FROM LOCAL POWER COMPANY t0 PROVIDE FINAL TER 1NATION I i BLDG STRUCTURE OF CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR TER"IINATIONS AT)(FM �rll I I � 5 GROUNDING PLAN 3 CONDUIT AT POUJER POLE I ''� NTS J NT9 I ( I o G— 1- 8 i11 I a NUS 16'4,CONCRETE - ( CONCRETE UNIVERSAL ACCESS PORT W/LID BARE CONDUCTOR I ENCLOSURE(C.UE.) t I N.. c I G MANUAL 0 ��+ ■ �J I TRANSFER PANEL E R'r Ilk..._ " l i-11 ,L J. VE SEE GROUNDINGI SWITCH ` O► I-1 I-IT_i- ° T�i� 11 PLAN l5 E I) I �I— �--� CO N a� —1,-1 1-1 I I-1 I - - / l •._ 1 1 i 11= 111=1, 1 I 2 oPVC-(s) /0 -1 ® I T - Q _I I I, -- G-----...... .."- ti I_I I- I I�1- d -I1 ° ! II T_ ' I . �-1 I-� © METER 4 METER SOCKET _- __ I I ��.r I—111T_ sl ^' 1 11-- =1 1 I I=111=11 1�1�-11 N. - - / 11-- I 11 I I-.—11-111-111-11- 2'mC-(3)•3/0 1 <I-I I—T I I I!I_ I I-)I I=1 I-1 0 T 1 I1=III I 4,- I-II-11I-In., -Lff 1 II-EI1=111- 11( II 1=11-(I I-111=L- SERVICE DISCONNECT OFCI ELECTRICAL PLAN �-I ICI I ,I I I1=111=111_, I I SGALE:3/8'=1'-0' - "` WIRE _ ELECTRICAL 5�'r'IDOLS ITRICAL PLACE NOTES • - 2'4,C-(3)*3/0 FLAG NOTE BENEATI4 THE ROAD FOR POWER D �I WITN LOCAL a 11111111°` GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES FOR PROPECONDUIT. PTH EXISTING POU.ER POLE IS 200'FROM SITE. A NITS 2�V,14 i PANEL BOARD r 3 240/12QJV,I+ SE RATED a- OR Ey FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH © PROVIDE 10 FEET OF CONDUIT UP THE POUTER POLE. PROVIDE 25 FEET OF COILED —� 200A OFGI CONDUCTOR PROVIDE TEMPORARY RAIN SEAL AT TOP CONDUIT. COORDINATE W 10'ROD COJIF` OR TRANSFORMER,INSULATING LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR XRNR TERMINATION. LL TEST GROUND FROM INTERIOR BUS. MUST BE LESS THAN 5 OHMS TO EARTH, Q O KW METER © CONTACT ENGINEER FOR PROPER GROUND TEST PROCEDURE. IF TEST RESULTS ® fy PANEL A SHOW IMPEDANCE GREATER THAN 5 OHM5,NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR ASSISTANCE IN [F[Y�71 - 2240/120V,Ib,3W O INECEPTAGLRPOSE LOCATING GROUND RODS. = C M SE RATED • MANHOLE °eo I?�JMGR. OFGI 99,659 DDV ¢— OR —q F--- BREAK FOR CLARITY NOTE: OR DISTANCE TEST WELL REQUIRED. EXPOSED RACEWAY 1 FIELD VERIFY LOCATION G GROUNDING U ..— UNDERGROUND RACEWAY ------ `e El 6'\fGROUNDING ROD DETAIL 4 ONE LINE DIAGRAM — — ' CONDUIT�"�11NG"P �J NTS NT5 —~— OR EXITING GRADE OF SHEETS