Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR2000-00016
SDR2000 - 00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 ���� ';a f 0'71 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2000-00007 CITY OrFTGARD Community D i e(opmeut JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION Shaping ag3ettercommunity 120 DAYS = 1/18/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00016 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2000-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. OWNER: David Metzger APPLICANT: Nicoli Engineering P.O. Box 275 Jim Andrews, Project Mgr. Sherwood, OR 97140 9025 SW Center Street PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300 and 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district orovides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, of-ice and small-scale commercial uses, e.g. restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approvalhe findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Sectio ',x '& NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger 503-639-4171, x317. 1 . Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. 2. Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. 3. Submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. 4. Submit a narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Design Standards. 5. Submit a verification letter that the franchise hauler approves the refuse container and location. 6. Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. 7. Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. 8. Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure, new driveway construction, signal modification (if necessary), and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in acdition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering - Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 20 • 13. The applicant's oOnstruction plans shall show that thr, will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace It with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a plan that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. 15. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Durham Road to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the address (7910 SW Beveland Street). Based on this search, staff could not find any record of past land use activity. The property was previously used as residential, with a single-story home on the property. Vicinity Information: Adjacent properties to the east and south are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and are developed with office/warehouse/manufacturing buildings. Property on the west side is zoned R-12 and developed as an elementary school. Property on the north side of SW Durham Road is zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) and is developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 20 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET A letter was received from Merry Callahan, who lives on SW Bond Street, near the intersection of SW Bond Street and SW 79 Avenue. Her letter listed a few concerns that can be addressed by Engineering. First, Ms. Callahan is concerned about the additional traffic impact from this development and has asked for an assessment of the number of cars that may enter and exit this development on a given day. The City did not require a formal traffic impact report for this development because the amount of traffic it will generate is not considered significant. The City uses a similar guideline that is used by Washington County and the City of Beaverton as to when a traffic impact report should be required. For a street like Durham Road, with traffic volumes likely over 6,000 cars per day, a traffic impact report would not be required if the development were going to add less than 500 trips per day. Based on estimates derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (Sixth Edition), the proposed office building addition will generate approximately 115 new trips per average weekday. Because of the existing traffic signal, Staff has recommended a condition that will require the applicant to modify the existing signal to accommodate the new driveway into this site. It is Staffs opinion that the applicant has sufficiently addressed the traffic impact from this development. Second, M . Callahan indicated that she has a concern with the amount of green time for the SW 79 Avenue leg of the signalized intersection. Staff spoke to the City Engineer about this and found that there have been no other complaints of inadequate green time. SW Durham Road is the primary leg of that intersection because it is an arterial street, and because of this and the large amount of traffic it carries, it is given the majority of the green time. The City Engineer does not intend to alter the timing of this signal. Third, the letter raises a concern that because of heavy congestion on SW Durham Road, additional traffic from this development may use SW 79th Avenue to travel to and from the north. It is feasible that some portion of the site traffic will use SW 79t Avenue, but very likely the volume of trip will be less than 50% of the site traffic. It can be argued that the existing width of SW 79 Avenue would meet the standards of a local residential street. A local residential street can accommodate up to 1,500 vehicles per day. At present, there is approximately 800 vehicles per average weekday, based on very recent traffic counts by the City. Even if 100% of the site traffic used SW 79' Avenue (115 cars per day), Staff would not consider this significant, and certainly would not consider the additional traffic to be overly burdensome on the existing street. In summary, this development will not have a negative impact on the transportation system, and by modifying the existing traffic signal and locating the new site driveway across from SW 79th Avenue, the traffic impacts from the development will be adequately mitigated. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.410 Lot Line Adjustment) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.775 Sensitive lands) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resources Overlay) B. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 D. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 20 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Applicable Development Code Standards The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Development Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Lot Line Adjustments (18.410): Approval criteria. Section 18.410.040: The Director shall approve or deny a request for a lot line adjustment in writing based on findings that the following criteria are satisfied: An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; No new lots will be created as part of this adjustment; two (2) lots exist and two (2) lots will remain after the proposed adjustment. There is no minimum lot size for the I-P zone. In any event, the lots will be 47,261 and 484,807 square feet after the adjustment. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; Reducing the size of the larger lot and increasing the size of the smaller lot will not create a violation of the City of Tigard's Development Code or zoning district regulations. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, including: • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district; • The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way may not be included in the lot area calculation; • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement; and • Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. The width of the smaller lot at its shortest point is 149 feet wide. No flag lot will result from this application. Each lot has frontage on SW Durham Road and each lot has at least one access that is at least 15 feet wide. Both lots are zoned I-P, according to Table 18.530.2, no setbacks are required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. Tax Lot 300 does abut a residential zone to the west and has a setback of 62 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. With Regard to Flag Lots: • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. • A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 20 Neither lot will be a flag lot; therefore, this standard does not apply. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. According to the plans, the lengths of both lots are 322 feet 6 inches and a new accessway is associated with the concurrent Site Development Review. A new fire hydrant is proposed 56 feet from the northern property line and located within the landscaping on the west side of Tax Lot 300. Tax Lot 200 has an existing fire hydrant located in the northern parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is proposed with this application. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Both lots have existing access to SW Durham Road. Therefore, this standard has been met. Exemptions From Dedications: A lot line adjustment is not considered a development action for purposes of determining whether floodplain, greenway, or right-of-way dedication is required. Plain maps show no floodplain and no greenway or right-of-way dedication is necessary with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Variances to Development Standards: An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applicant has not requested a variance or an adjustment with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Lot Line Adjustment criteria have been met. Industrial Zoning Districts (18.530): 18.530.050.B. states that lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% as part of the site development review process, providing the following requirements are satisfied: The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The applicant shall meet the following performance standards with regard to the landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process: Street trees, as required by Section 18.745.040 C1 are to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height; the landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; All applicable buffering, screening and setback requirements contained in Section 18.745.050 shall be satisfied. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area. The applicant has requested the maximum allowable site coverage to be increased to 80%. In order to allow the increase, the landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The site plan shows the landscaping to be 23% of the site. The applicant will be conditioned to provide street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. The landscaping between the parking area and the street property line is 10 feet. Buffering, screening and setbacks are addressed later in this decision and the applicant has included an extensive care program for the landscaping associated with this project. Therefore, based on the completion of the following condition, the applicant may increase the lot coverage to 80%. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Industrial Zoning Standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 20 CONDITION:Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Plans indicate that a walkway extends from the ground floor entrance of the existing 21,000 square foot building to the sidewalk abutting SW Durham. To insure that the walkway will be available, a crossover easement will need to be recorded. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway crosses a vehicle access by 24 feet. The walkway is stripped with appropriate pavement markings. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans show the walkway paved with a hard surface material. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot access with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will have less that 100 parking spaces and has 2 points of access into the parking lot off of SW Durham Road. Because the existing 21,000 square foot building and the 10,320 square foot addition is being reviewed as one project, a cross over easement will need to be recorded where the two tax lots abut to the north and south of the projects. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the access and egress standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION:Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 20 Street trees have already been addressed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses, which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Table 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as a specified in the matrix. The proposed construction is for an office/manufacturing building, which is allowed outright in the I-P zone. This parcel abuts R-12 zoned land to the west side of the property, and 1-P to the east and south. According to the buffer matrix for the parking area, a Type C buffer is required next to a residential zoned property (west property line). As shown on the landscape Ian, the applicant has provided screening equal to a D-2 buffer which includes 15 feet of plan, along the west side of the property, with a 4.5 foot high decorative rock wall and a 6-foot chain link fence to provide the required screening. Therefore, this standard has been met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 37 parking spaces are proposed on the west side of the property. According to the standard, 5 parking lot trees are required. The applicant has provided 6 parking lot trees, 4, 8-inch Vine Maples and 2, Pin Oaks. The applicant has positioned 2 of the required trees on 6-foot landscaped islands and has created a larger 18-foot landscaped island with 2, 1%-inch Royal Red Maples, 5, five-gallon Doublefile Viburnum and 6, five-gallon Viburnums. However, all trees must be planted with a 2-inch caliper or greater. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit a plan showing all trees to be 2-inches in caliper or greater. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; All gas meters and other service facilities are located within the landscaped areas except the refuse container, which is addressed below. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans show service facilities to be located at the southwest end of the lot and screened with 6-foot concrete walls and chain link fence. The facility is separated from the proposed truck parking area with a 4-foot island with 3, two-gallon Shrub Rose. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 20 FINDING: Based on me analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: The applicant will be conditioned to submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not provided information pertaining to any one of the four methods to demonstrate compliance with this chapter. Therefore, the applicant will be required to address one the four methods mentioned above. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The location of the proposed refuse container is not in a required front yard and is centrally located for all users. The proposed location is not within a parking area. The applicant has not provided a service provider letter from the franchise hauler. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to submit verification that the franchise hauler approves the container and placement. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclable design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 20 CONDITIONS: Submit narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Design Standards. Submit verification letter that the franchise hauler approves of the refuse container and location. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Vehicle Parking Plan Requirements: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision. Loading/Unloading Driveways: A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. This application does not include a school or a meeting facility. Therefore, this standard does not apply. On-Site Vehicle Stacking For Drive-In Use: All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1 of the Development Code. No drive-in is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Curb Cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Curb cuts will be discussed later in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. The site plan does not indicated a grade separation between the existing parking area of tax lot 200 and 309. Therefore, no preventive barriers will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 20 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area can not be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's site plan does not indicate that wheel stops will be provided for those parking stalls that abut the boundary of the development or those stalls at the front of the proposed building and on the west side that abut the pedestrian walkways. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to have wheel stops that are at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of those parking stall mentioned. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans show the parking stalls to be 9 feet by 18.5 feet without extending into landscaped areas, which meets the minimum requirement for standard parking stalls. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The applicant has provided six (6) bicycle parking spaces at the southeast corner of the building. he spaces are within 50 feet of an entrance, however, the spaces can not be seen from the street. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to provide directional signs from the front of the building. Bicycle Parkin Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material i.e., pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 20 The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used. Therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for Office, 0.5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The building has approximately 5,676 square feet of office space. Table 18.765.2 also states that bicycle parking is required for warehouse and light industrial square footage. Based on the calculations of these uses associated with this addition, no bicycle spaces are required. Therefore, only 3 bicycle parking stalls are required. The applicant has provided 7. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. According to the applicant, no tenants have been identified at this time, but assumptions have been made in order to estimate the square footage of the anticipated occupancy types, which were used to develop the required parking spaces. A break down of estimated square footages is as follows: Office = (2.7/1000), therefore, (5,676 sq. ft. = 15 spaces). Warehouse = (0.5/1000), therefore, (3,096 sq. ft. = 1.5 spaces). Light Industrial = (1.6/1000), therefore, (1,548 sq. ft. = 2.5 spaces). According to the estimated square footage of each use, this addition requires only 19 parking stalls. The applicant has provided a total of 37 parking stalls. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed addition is 10,320 square feet. The plans provide one truck parking stall and one "truck maneuvering staging area." According to the City Engineer, the loading and maneuvering space meets City specifications. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. • Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. • Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 20 No signs are associated with this application. However, any sign will need to be approved by future applications for sign permits. Therefore, this standard has been deferred until time of application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Sign standards can be deferred until time of application. Tree Removalj18.790): Section 18.79 030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the arborist report submitted, 236.5 inches of Sequoias were removed from the proposed site. The owner has replanted 114.6 inches of Sequoias along the perimeter of the project and 187 inches of trees within the landscaped areas of the project totaling 301.6 inches — 65.1 inches in excess of the combined diameters of the trees being removed. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Tree Removal criteria have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight.(8JJ feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant does not propose anything to be constructed in the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains -no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (underlying zone); Relationshi• to the Natural and Ph sical Environment: :ui •ings s a •e: oca e• o preserve exis ing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding' located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 20 The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the building as far away from the residential zone abutting the west side of the subject property without sacrificing the intent of the project. Out of the 12 existing trees on the property, 11 are to be relocated. 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of pa pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. No landfill or development is being done within a floodplain. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the entrance of the building. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has no objection to it. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Public transit is available on SW Durham Road and pedestrian access to SW Durham has been provided via walkway connections. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Drainage will be discussed under the Street and Utility Section below. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; For this project, 2 disabled parking spaces are required and the applicant has provided 2 spaces that are 9 feet wide and 8-foot access isle. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 20 • • TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 47,261 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 149 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 117 sq.ft. - Side facing street on corner&through lots [1] 20 ft. - - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 63 ft. - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 96 ft. - Distance between front of garage& property line abutting a public or private street -- - Maximum Height 45 ft. 27 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 75% [5] 77% Maximum Landscape Requirement 25% [6] 23% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4]Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6]Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards have been fully met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as aportion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 to 35 feet of right-of-way (ROW) from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should ensure that there is a minimum of 35 feet of ROW as suggested by the applicant's plan. If there is less than 35 feet from centerline, the applicant must dedicate additional ROW. SW Durham Road is currently improved with curb and sidewalk in this area. The City recently completed a traffic signal at the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 79 Avenue, across from the proposed driveway. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should add street trees along the frontage of the site and make any necessary modifications to the traffic signal and controllers to accommodate the new driveway. The applicant will also need to close an existing driveway adjacent to thg western property boundary in order to construct the new driveway across from SW 79 Avenue. The old driveway apron shall be removed and new curb and sidewalk shall be installed in its place. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 20 Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on SW Durham Road. No additional sidewalk work is needed, except for what is needed to fill in for the old driveway approach at the western property boundary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate the new building will be served from an existing 6-inch sanitary sewer stub that was provided to this site. The applicant's contractor will need to verify the location of that lateral prior to connection. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The project plan will not negatively impact the upstream drainage basin because the upstream area is accommodated by the storm system in SW Reiling Street. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how onsite detention will be provided. Stormwater treatment is adequately addressed, but the 25-year detention does not appear to be addressed. There is adequate space on this site to accommodate at least below-grade detention, so Staff is confident that this standard can be met. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will meet the onsite detention requirement. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 20 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. All overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road were placed underground as a part of the recent improvement. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The applicant proposes to extend the existing onsite water system to serve the new building. If any public water line work is necessary, it must be covered by a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department and must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 20 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant intends to install a manufactured unit made by StormTreat Systems, Inc. This type of facility has been approved by the City on prior projects because the manufacturer information shows that these systems will achieve the total phosphorus removal required by the USA standards. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan shall be submitted with the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. D. Impact Study (18.390) Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 20 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $21,311 based on the 5,676 square feet of office, 3,096 square feet of warehouse and 1,548 square feet of light industrial proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $66,597 ($21,311 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $45,285.87. The applicant has been required by the Engineering Department to plant street trees and fill in an old driveway approach with a new curb and sidewalk. Based on the cost of these improvements, the requirements are more than roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. At most the applicant would be required to dedicate no more than 5 feet of right-of-way at 12 dollars per linear foot, for a value of $8,940 thus it is easily roughly proportional to the unmitigated impact of $45,285.87. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Move new hydrant 200 feet south and 40 feet east. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department comments were received in the form of a letter concerning procedural issues related to tree removal. STAFF RESPONSE: Discussions were conducted via telephone conversations. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Since this is an addition to an existing building, we will not require a separate domestic water for the new addition. We will, however, want to make sure that the existing 1-inch meter is capable of meeting all service requirements. Applicant will need to provide the Water Division, the water usage calculations for both existing building and proposed addition. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Unified Sewerage Agency comments were received in the form of a letter. Staff Response: USA's issues have been addressed under the street and utility NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 20 improvement section of this decision. Portland General Electric has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 13, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. App eal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �� ��..n� �;•.' _ November 13, 2000 PRE'A' B : Mathe :cneidegger DATE As a6t Planner r(Ak1/ft-, e-4 November 13, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewe .dorff DATE Planning Manager :\cu rp I n\m a th a w\sd r\S D R2000-00016.d e c.d oc.d o t NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 20 W . 1 W / :> \ — - -- -- -s--"' - . _ r-. SW DURHAM ROAD ✓+ro.r...w.nr f ���ir4- • CUM... L.00 1=.f. r' • : r 11111111111111' '11111%, All 111911111M Ifr. ' 4ir:�� iEPea r - r +y __ -_ ow 1st R __me —:— •_wi JR 11141/4]tA.UFi13d`•WlTMIZIOISISMIanrAt�RpU 00000u •∎WLNI•t{mano U to '1 is MMEIMEMIIIMP.fI_ ■ti !IEampwwur .& II may`1�� • P- 4 r%��� j ! a r . - •,.C... .P: • d s 1 4 • al 3 t.A . fIiU1 ,Al : m no,,,..a. • ✓.L/r. ,., .ftWM - MR PGK INP. 112 A'44,iw Ejimijmir.. .. ._r :41' ..p.......004.4LLIIMMilltall111111 tin. . III PROPOSED EXISTING _ CITY Of TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD SDR2000-000 1 6 SITE PLAN N JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION (Map is not to scale) • 1 A Vaal" ��� __--gv, � �_• CITY of TI ARD • f=. _ 0e00a A PA C INFORMATION SYSTEM E s _ �`,,� l r,,� VICINITY MAP — ` A 1 IIIIIII SDR2000-000 I b E•q LN '111111 W JACKSON . 111111 IlullilIll BUSINESS ,—.—'— I CST Q. I CENTER y _�11111111111�■ ADDITION DURHAM RD -f ---- O��O,■ -1 .., i 9 co . fa SIT \\ °II-04,, ,"Ro / ______________ . ,. 1 • � N e°°� t0p 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fat G I"-376 bet 1) * City of Tigard il . Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 hrip://www.ci.figard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2000;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 CITY OF TIGARD LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2000-00007 Community®eve(opment S&ping) Better Community JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION 120 DAYS = 1/18/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00016 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2000-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. OWNER: David Metzger APPLICANT: Nicoli Engineering P.O. Box 275 Jim Andrews, Project Mgr. Sherwood, OR 97140 9025 SW Center Street PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300 and 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 13, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidectger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. _._________,- �� SW DURHAM ROAD may,'•.' ..1..1-% Ai�'I� ter_ \ _r rpl�H6 - -. ---- ,.. .,. PI i_r Y' 7:: 01 pi r . . . 1,l,,,,,.. ! _ - - CITY OF TIGARD SDR2000-00016 SITE PLAN N JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION (Map Is not to stab) 3EesT 1111 t1.� �'�Sr �- VICINITY MAP a� U '-y'- VIM �■ �0_ SDR2000-00016 _.l 1..:.; 11111 !7 1 • JACKSON -_. 1111 11111111111I BUSINESS 11�11i.u1 •niiiiuIIII t1 • , CENTER —' �� - ADDITION _ten I ; _DIM04W 11p �` - i. mi ,, I b i N C.;OrTIW,a ! 11.11.11 I IP 7 DATE: /O,/ 6' 2.O:v� PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE „I'c KS ok.) T3 A S TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP NO.Z.S//3,48OOZw f2Sf/48Oo3oo SITES NO.ADDRESS:r� LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP /7/o Su J D,4,^ C 0. tivl RESIDENTIAL $ 213.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 54.00 )( OFFICE $ 195.00 f/ X INDUSTRIAL $205.00 ' �fr INSTITUTIONAL $ 88.00 (.$r� PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE 7/O4 /5-0, //O alX�.- c 1/H LT'4 TRIP RATE BASIS: /W/CCc vT— /�rUP0SeS C S7 Ucf/U.tJ 4 i✓C(.J A/ TU A de I Ai 7-v Con/S,sr0-4 S if 012e;cc 3/ 0 94, gf wel,^co /louse .5'4l r L CALCULATIONS: 7/ F C(4 e5 7-IA Vs X 7;6 •5P) — ,�PCI s. TI"I/4 E 4TH /� as-Z = (/. 3/ x 3.G7C ) > /95- w/l, _ 47 I oY7 ( • y8� 3.oy�r,� - /0) A. 2 asr z/j al 2, 2 /2 — C 6'9 7 K f syo j )C Z 0 S PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: �y / /0? `r 2 /j 31/ X5/T= /07 x /�P=jr/i V FEE: 2 74/ FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: /D Tie/' C.eFV/". ps•St.,AAEc/ J r- 1�Pn.t o sc DwP(//h/y 2000 — D0/(o8 ROAD AMT.:17,-s-6 /` TRANSIT AMT, PREPARE Ail I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-00 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIES LDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF OF TIGARD Community Devethpment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: September 27, 2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11, 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide th isis for an appeal to the Tigard Piz ig Commission must address the relevant approval criteria witri sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." _._._i _- 1 „ .. -_._�K. �_ a CITY of TIDARD um •IV „ Elf VICINITY MAP 3EE ST IN _MI An MR 1 R MINE INII N SDR2000-00016 m4 ' ` ;:111111 Wu 4 X111111 �i w JACKSON /Ar1 11-=!111111 IIIIIIIIIM II 111 BUSINESS =u . �11111111111ii CENTER � NW ADDITION . I ing . I DURHAM RD , ... az ui7> 41:.s, . • o' N i City of Tigard ra.,a oa nssr erow>+. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2000-00016, Jackson Business Center Addition Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 to 35 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should ensure that there is a minimum of 35 feet of ROW as suggested by the applicant's plan. If there is less than 35 feet from centerline, the applicant must dedicate additional ROW. SW Durham Road is currently improved with curb and sidewalk in this area. The City recently completed a traffic signal at the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 79� Avenue, across from the proposed driveway. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should add street trees along the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 1 frontage of the site and make any necessary modifications to the traffic signal and controllers to accommodate the new driveway. The applicant will also need to close an existing driveway adjacent to the western property boundary in order to construct the new driveway across from SW 79th Avenue. The old driveway apron shall be removed and new curb and sidewalk shall be installed in its place. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on SW Durham Road. No additional sidewalk work is needed, except for what is needed to fill in for the old driveway approach at the western property boundary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate the new building will be served from an existing 6- inch sanitary sewer stub that was provided to this site. The applicant's contractor will need to verify the location of that lateral prior to connection. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 2 Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The project plan will not negatively impact the upstream drainage basin. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how onsite detention will be provided. Stormwater treatment is adequately addressed, but the 25-year detention does not appear to be addressed. There is adequate space on this site to accommodate at least below-grade detention, so Staff is confident that this standard can be met. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will meet the onsite detention requirement. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 3 such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 4 All overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road were placed underground as a part of the recent improvement. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The applicant proposes to extend the existing onsite water system to serve the new building. If any public water line work is necessary, it must be covered by a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department and must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant intends to install a manufactured unit made by StormTreat Systems, Inc. This type of facility has been approved by the City on prior projects because the manufacturer information shows that these systems will achieve the total phosphorus removal required by the USA standards. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 5 Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan shall be submitted with the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 6 Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure, new driveway construction, signal modification (if necessary), and any other work in the public right-of- way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace it with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a plan that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 7 Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Durham Road to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \1t ig333\usr\depts\eng\6rianr\comm ents\sdr\sdr2000-00016.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 8 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: November 9, 2000 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2000-00016, Jackson Business Center Addition ** REVISED ** Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 to 35 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should ensure that there is a minimum of 35 feet of ROW as suggested by the applicant's plan. If there is less than 35 feet from centerline, the applicant must dedicate additional ROW. SW Durham Road is currently improved with curb and sidewalk in this area. The City recently completed a traffic signal at the intersection of SW Durham Road ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 1 and SW 79th Avenue, across from the proposed driveway. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should add street trees along the frontage of the site and make any necessary modifications to the traffic signal and controllers to accommodate the new driveway. The applicant will also need to close an existing driveway adjacent to the western property boundary in order to construct the new driveway across from SW 79th Avenue. The old driveway apron shall be removed and new curb and sidewalk shall be installed in its place. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on SW Durham Road. No additional sidewalk work is needed, except for what is needed to fill in for the old driveway approach at the western property boundary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate the new building will be served from an existing 6- inch sanitary sewer stub that was provided to this site. The applicant's contractor will need to verify the location of that lateral prior to connection. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 2 Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The project plan will not negatively impact the upstream drainage basin. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how onsite detention will be provided. Stormwater treatment is adequately addressed, but the 25-year detention does not appear to be addressed. There is adequate space on this site to accommodate at least below-grade detention, so Staff is confident that this standard can be met. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will meet the onsite detention requirement. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 3 such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 4 All overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road were placed underground as a part of the recent improvement. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Comments: A letter was received from Merry Callahan, who lives on SW Bond Street, near the intersection of SW Bond Street and SW 79th Avenue. Her letter listed a few concerns that can be addressed by Engineering. First, Ms. Callahan is concerned about the additional traffic impact from this development and has asked for an assessment of the number of cars that may enter and exit this development on a given day. The City did not require a formal traffic impact report for this development because the amount of traffic it will generate is not considered significant. The City uses a similar guideline that is used by Washington County and the City of Beaverton as to when a traffic impact report should be required. For a street like Durham Road, with traffic volumes likely over 6,000 cars per day, a traffic impact report would not be required if the development were going to add less than 500 trips per day. Based on estimates derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (Sixth Edition), the proposed office building addition will generate approximately 115 new trips per average weekday. Because of the existing traffic signal, Staff has recommended a condition that will require the applicant to modify the existing signal to accommodate the new driveway into this site. It is Staffs opinion that the applicant has sufficiently addressed the traffic impact from this development. Second, Ms. Callahan indicated that she has a concern with the amount of green time for the SW 79th Avenue leg of the signalized intersection. Staff spoke to the City Engineer about this and found that there have been no other complaints of inadequate green time. SW Durham Road is the primary leg of that intersection because it is an arterial street, and because of this and the large amount of traffic it carries, it is given the majority of the green time. The City Engineer does not intend to alter the timing of this signal. Third, the letter raises a concern that because of heavy congestion on SW Durham Road, additional traffic from this development may use SW 79th Avenue to travel to and from the north. It is feasible that some portion of the site traffic will use SW 79th Avenue, but very likely the volume of trips will be less than 50% of the site traffic. Even if 100% of the site traffic used SW 79th Avenue (115 cars per day), Staff would not consider this significant, and certainly would not consider the additional traffic to be overly burdensome on the existing street. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 5 In summary, it is Staffs opinion that this development will not have a negative impact on the transportation system, and by modifying the existing traffic signal and locating the new site driveway across from SW 79th Avenue, the traffic impacts from the development will be adequately mitigated. Public Water System: The applicant proposes to extend the existing onsite water system to serve the new building. If any public water line work is necessary, it must be covered by a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department and must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant intends to install a manufactured unit made by StormTreat Systems, Inc. This type of facility has been approved by the City on prior projects because the manufacturer information shows that these systems will achieve the total phosphorus removal required by the USA standards. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 6 Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan shall be submitted with the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure, new driveway construction, signal modification (if necessary), and any other work in the public right-of- way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 7 addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace it with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a plan that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 8 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Durham Road to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \\tig333\usr\depts\eng\bnanr\comments\sdr\sdr2000-00016.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2000-00016 Jackson Bus. Ctr. Add. PAGE 9 OCT-17 ee 12: 11 FROM:NASHCO LAND DEL) SERI) 503-846-2908 TO:5036847297 PAGE:02/02 RECEIVED SEP282000 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C ►oFT10ARD LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Community(Ucvel�]�mcnt LAND US & TRANSPORTATION Shaping,A(Better Conrntunity DATE: September 27,2000 TO: S€e i as o 09ton County Department of land Use a Transportation FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Schelde! !or As . ant Planner( Phone: [5081689-41T1/ ax: [5081684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION 1 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square r foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e,g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED Y_QUR COMMENTS SACK BY: NOVEmEtER 2, 2000, You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. o e . • : =. - ! • ! ! 1 : : ! • _ • - t, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. LPLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: -14 A G�evC IeG�- -f ■ / c9 r1 1 duaaV1/ �+ . to 4 4. • a C(r) 4�a��r, Gam G ass 7I4„ k- yew ()Tease E,muide the folrnwina it firrmat.iun)Name of Persontsl Commenting: •pot/ /i/e4/4 Phone Number's): c 63 .. VAS- 3b' z OCT-17 00 12: 11 FROM:NASHCO LAND DEV SERV 503-846-2908 TO:5036847297 PAGE:01/0P WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 155 N. FIRST ST., #350-13 • HILLS8ORO, OR 97121 PHONE: (503) 846-8761 • FAX: (503) 646-2908 WWW.Co.WASI-IIN0TON.0R.US FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: l' la-424..J FAx NUMBER: S - 6 g �' /Z `J_ ? PHONE: FROM: Fr►i ��IC, PHONE: S G 5 - _ z. DATE: f TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: Z If all pages do not arrive in legible form, please contact us by telephone at(503) 846-8761. RE: (j�ckG0,,_ "I•,LA- r-^ yr IA URGENT C FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE ❑ AS REQUESTED NOTES/COMMENTS: • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY�O TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: John Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031639.4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ('lease provide the following information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: I Phone Number's): I MEMORANDUM Aitk+TO: Matt Scheidegger e` FROM: John Roy RE: Jackson Business Center Addition DATE: October 5, 2000 I am wondering about our review process in that the developer has already cut down the trees identified in this application. I thought that they were supposed to wait until the site development review process was completed. The return for comment date on the application is 2 November. I sent Matt Stine (Urban Forester), out to take a look at the site last week. The trees' in question for removal were already removed. It would seem that we would not want the developer to remove trees before the site plan is approved. What if we had wanted to try to save a large Sequoia? Too late. Anyway, if you could please explain the process I would appreciate it very much. Also I would also appreciate information on how the Urban Forester can be involved in the process to give input when that input can still be utilized or incorporated into the comments of the plan review. Please respond to these questions by 10 November if you can please. Cc: Ed Wegner, Dick Bewersdorff MEMORANDUM TO: John Roy ,.,..,, FROM: Matt Stine RE: Jackson Business Center Addition DATE: October 3, 2000 John, I am writing regarding your request to review tree plans for the Jackson Business Center Addition. On October 2, 2000 I noticed that all of the Sequoia trees that you had concerns about (listed to be removed in the tree plan) had already been removed. On October 3, 2000 I visited the site to double check that the trees in question had actually been removed. All of the Sequoias (numbers 10 through 19 on the Landscape Plan) have in fact been removed. I called David Cory, the ISA Certified Arborist who developed the tree plan for the construction company, to find out what happened to the trees (10-19). Mr. Cory said that the trees had been cut down since they were too big to be moved with a tree spade and survival would have been 50/50. If you have any questions please let me know. %I& /r < - Matt Stine To: Mathew Scheidegger page 1 of 2 From: Merry Callahan, resident, 79th &Bond St. Re: Comment on site development (SDR)2000-00016 Date: September 28, 2000 AECEiveop,(ANA/ I NG Dear Mr. Scheidegger OOT 03 000 Please forward my comments into the appropriate ree 1 co- OP 7.„, O In regard to the above application notification, I h P,gror*3e 4 us concern and a few, equally serious comments on the proposed Jackson Busine Centertition. I want to preface my remarks with the assertion that I am not opposed, in ; page 2 of 2 judgment against the city, from an anguished parent on this subject, could, foreseeably, bankrupt the municipal budget for years. Finally, I would merely make the caution that the phrase in the I-P zone description 'no off-site impacts' will always be a legally subjective definition. As that same homeowner, I reserve my right to that subjective opinion now, and in future years. My opinion will concern resonating noises that infiltrate the night and daytime airwaves, as in the low frequency and stress inducing thrum of large commercial air conditioners, heavy equipment for night-time parking lot cleaning, high intensity parking lot lights with no 'top down' shields to prevent excessive ambient illumination thrown into the adjacent neighborhood, etc. I would welcome a dialogue with the landlords of this building on the above subjects. And, I would feel more comfortable in the long term happy co-existence with this site and others in the vicinity if CC&R's were placed in the deed for the future sales to a, possibly, less scrupulous property owner than, I am sure must be these owners. CC&R's that are well-written need not be punitive to future sales and could head-off potentially, and costly to all parties, litigation over the subjective definition of'no off-site impacts', Lest you feel any of the above concerns be beyond the venue of the Applicable Review Criteria, please be sensitive to the fact that you, as the members- either or appointed or elected-to review this process, are the first and last line of defense against the inflammatory downsides of land development near private neighborhoods. As an active Business Consultant, I encourage the responsible development of commerce in all forms. Commerce and development, done with discretion and attention to the needs of both business and neighborhood communities, can be prosperous for all parties. Commerce done casually, however, or with inadequate input, can create a community lacking in charm and a feeling of civic continuity. I would deplore a chain of land use decisions that would see Tigard, twenty years down, as an Industrial Bypass community with it's streets filled with vehicles rushing and tail-gating off to better places in which to live. This could happen, one clogged street at a time. I hope that you and the applicant hold the same view and I would be pleased to participate, if called upon, in the achievement of this, in my opinion, wholly obtainable goal. incerely, Merry Call an Home Owner, 79th&Bond St. Retail Expert/Business Consultant '7IN) aN6 �7 oci33 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program)CT 0 6 2000 . [ ! �JI I FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD S�P 2 8 2000 �' STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x317) By_ Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [503)684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2000-00016 .- JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person[s)Commenting: - l v/ I Phone Number[s): s�Ti- z311.0 �4 J / U A f Fra UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 2000 TO: Mathew Scheidegger, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA \a, SUBJECT: Jackson Business Center Addition, SDR 2000-00016 SANITARY SEWER The development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency's Design and Construction Standards. Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 00-.7. STORM SEWER The development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by the R&O. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25- year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. • If the City is going to allow the StormTreat system for water quality as a privately maintained system, then the Agency recommends a monitoring schedule to be in place to collect data on performance. If the system does not meet the Agency's requirements for phosphorus removal, then an accepted method of treatment will need to be installed. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT' o TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVED PLANNING FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OCT 0 5 2000 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) CITY OF TIGARD Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefo((owing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: , M \1\10�k Phone Number(sl: a.xo I • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: September 27,2000 RECEIVED PLANNING TAB /'inn Michael Miner,Operations Utility Manager OCT 0 3 2000 FBOM:'-�a ; City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x311) Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2, 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: r,vc (S (S #14v Tu ATl Fk/,J AJ(t. 3urc..Oi,v(Z Wes W/L[_ Ajar u r/u£. A- SEPA-n..e rE. Daf €c7-/c. IJATE.Q 7Z A./ea Aa0/7/6N, IJ • G✓iu L 1.1uw6venrr_ LJJNr r M,4L4 5u,i Z /Sr,v ca /-/Av c.i4, Mer ,a PRALZ of. /LtErriNJ, /Eeeu i 4t:At7't'. A/ 6-70 Pri-cVie . L/.4ree Zit//3lur./ 7,71E 1,147E4 li,?i4 &UC4,c -f ft JS `ems i c.71-4 P.-Sr/sm./iv 3(.rie4)/A∎ee /17t1 ) Pit,yose2 7 1)1,7(T/ u- (Please provide theforTwing information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: Phone Number[sl: .x REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O TIIGARD Community(Development Shaping,a Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Brian Moore,PGE Service Design Consultant ivto FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division OC/, N/NG 0 3 STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 ca-yo 2000 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1297 AFT/GAA0 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION _ REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (2lease provide the following information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: 1A� ( L;— I Phone Number(sl: 1 O- AAc L REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official 9ificaar-fia"tINfIG FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division SEP STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x317] Larcea I Phone: [503]639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. $ Written comments provided below: l. Apo ► r�z.a.a-r 200' souTM 4k4 1r drsr —Cre4 01 2• ''c Ace-E4.4. Qv4,0 ..0 9(r s( 134-0 Sv.464Fxs 1. "V MA•a4rnt.m We-I-show TI1 P'1-A•/2puelp (Please provide the foil-owing information)Name of Person[s]Commenting: ci ' Phone Number[s]: 1(1) PT ,ANNING SECRETARY MATERIALS • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING -I..4 CY OF TIGARD Community Development S hoping A Better Community STAR OAF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. of City rgard ) I, cPatricia G. Gunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an _Administrative Specialist//for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropnate Box(s)Below) NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) -- City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00016/MIS2000-00001 -JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION _ _ _ . a AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) �aie of P:l,Ho.m,iyi • City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer • Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: I AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: L I (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, m e hibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit' ',on Nouembe 13 000 . ;d depo-'ted in the United States Mail on November13,2000, postage prepaid. , A ' -6 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of —...r'IL._ t...,Ak0-1._ , a , OFFICIAL SEAL /�' "� —_ irtt , ,:c 1 I 1 ; I I 1 ' •- DIANE M JELDERKS ,y> NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission . d Tres: 9 7 3 COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2000-00007 CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION Shaping ABetter Community 120 DAYS = 1/18/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00016 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2000-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. OWNER: David Metzger APPLICANT: Nicoli Engineering P.O. Box 275 Jim Andrews, Project Mgr. Sherwood, OR 97140 9025 SW Center Street PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300 and 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g. restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 1 OF 20 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger 503-639-4171, x317. 1 . Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. 2. Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. 3. Submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. 4. Submit a narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Design Standards. 5. Submit a verification letter that the franchise hauler approves the refuse container and location. 6. Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. 7. Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. 8. Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure, new driveway construction, signal modification (if necessary), and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated, which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 2 OF 20 13. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace it with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit a plan that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. 15. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Durham Road to increase the right-of-way to 35 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the address (7910 SW Beveland Street). Based on this search, staff could not find any record of past land use activity. The property was previously used as residential, with a single-story home on the property. Vicinity Information: Adjacent properties to the east and south are zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and are developed with office/warehouse/manufacturing buildings. Property on the west side is zoned R-12 and developed as an elementary school. Property on the north side of SW Durham Road is zoned R-12 (Residential, 12 units per acre) and is developed with single-family residences. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21 ,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 3 OF 20 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET A letter was received from Merry Callahan, who lives on SW Bond Street, near the intersection of SW Bond Street and SW 79 Avenue. Her letter listed a few concerns that can be addressed by Engineering. First, Ms. Callahan is concerned about the additional traffic impact from this development and has asked for an assessment of the number of cars that may enter and exit this development on a given day. The City did not require a formal traffic impact report for this development because the amount of traffic it will generate is not considered significant. The City uses a similar guideline that is used by Washington County and the City of Beaverton as to when a traffic impact report should be required. For a street like Durham Road, with traffic volumes likely over 6,000 cars per day, a traffic impact report would not be required if the development were going to add less than 500 trips per day. Based on estimates derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (Sixth Edition), the proposed office building addition will generate approximately 115 new trips per average weekday. Because of the existing traffic signal, Staff has recommended a condition that will require the applicant to modify the existing signal to accommodate the new driveway into this site. It is Staff's opinion that the applicant has sufficiently addressed the traffic impact from this development. Second, M . Callahan indicated that she has a concern with the amount of green time for the SW 79 Avenue leg of the signalized intersection. Staff spoke to the City Engineer about this and found that there have been no other complaints of inadequate green time. SW Durham Road is the primary leg of that intersection because it is an arterial street, and because of this and the large amount of traffic it carries, it is given the majority of the green time. The City Engineer does not intend to alter the timing of this signal. Third the letter raises a concern that because of heavy congestion on SW Durham Road, traffic from this development may use SW 79th Avenue to travel to and from the north. It is feasible that some portion of the site traffic will use SW 79t Avenue, but very likely the volume of trip will be less than 50% of the site traffic. It can be argued that the existing width of SW 79 Avenue would meet the standards of a local residential street. A local residential street can accommodate up to 1 ,500 vehicles per day. At present, there is approximately 800 vehicles per average weekday, baked on very recent traffic counts by the City. Even if 100% of the site traffic used SW 79'h Avenue (115 cars per day), Staff would not consider this significant, and certainly would not consider the additional traffic to be overly burdensome on the existing street. In summary, this development will not have a negative impact on the transportation system, and by modifying the existing traffic signal and locating the new site driveway across from SW 79th Avenue, the traffic impacts from the development will be adequately mitigated. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.410 Lot Line Adjustment) 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.775 Sensitive lands) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) 18.797 Water Resources Overlay) B. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 C. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 D. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 4 OF 20 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. Applicable Development Code Standards The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.730, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the following Development Code Chapters which are also listed under Section 18.360.090.A.1: 18.350 (Planned Developments), 18.715 (Density Computations), or 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations). These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards, and are not discussed in this decision. Lot Line Adjustments (18.410): Approval criteria. Section 18.410.040: The Director shall approve or deny a request for a lot line adjustment in writing based on findings that the following criteria are satisfied: An additional parcel is not created by the lot line adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustments is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; No new lots will be created as part of this adjustment; two (2) lots exist and two (2) lots will remain after the proposed adjustment. There is no minimum lot size for the I-P zone. In any event, the lots will be 47,261 and 484,807 square feet after the adjustment. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structures on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; Reducing the size of the larger lot and increasing the size of the smaller lot will not create a violation of the City of Tigard's Development Code or zoning district regulations. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district, including: • The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district; • The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way may not be included in the lot area calculation; • Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement; and • Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. The width of the smaller lot at its shortest point is 149 feet wide. No flag lot will result from this application. Each lot has frontage on SW Durham Road and each lot has at least one access that is at least 15 feet wide. Both lots are zoned I-P, according to Table 18.530.2, no setbacks are required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. Tax Lot 300 does abut a residential zone to the west and has a setback of 62 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. With Regard to Flag Lots: • When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. • A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 5 OF 20 Neither lot will be a flag lot; therefore, this standard does not apply. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. According to the plans, the lengths of both lots are 322 feet 6 inches and a new accessway is associated with the concurrent Site Development Review. A new fire hydrant is proposed 56 feet from the northern property line and located within the landscaping on the west side of Tax Lot 300. Tax Lot 200 has an existing fire hydrant located in the northern parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. No common drive is proposed with this application. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Both lots have existing access to SW Durham Road. Therefore, this standard has been met. Exemptions From Dedications: A lot line adjustment is not considered a development action for purposes of determining whether floodplain, greenway, or right-of-way dedication is required. Plain maps show no floodplain and no greenway or right-of-way dedication is necessary with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Variances to Development Standards: An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applicant has not requested a variance or an adjustment with this application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the Lot Line Adjustment criteria have been met. Industrial Zoning Districts (18.530): 18.530.050.8. states that lot coverage may be increased from 75% to 80% as part of the site development review process, providing the following requirements are satisfied: The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The applicant shall meet the following performance standards with regard to the landscaping plan approved as part of the site development review process: Street trees, as required by Section 18.745.040 C1 are to be installed with a minimum caliper of three inches rather than the two inches as measured at four feet in height; the landscaping between a parking lot and street property line shall have a minimum width of 10 feet; All applicable buffering, screening and setback requirements contained in Section 18.745.050 shall be satisfied. The applicant shall provide documentation of an adequate on-going maintenance program to ensure appropriate irrigation and maintenance of the landscape area. The applicant has requested the maximum allowable site coverage to be increased to 80%. In order to allow the increase, the landscaping requirement shall be 20% of the site. The site plan shows the landscaping to be 23% of the site. The applicant will be conditioned to provide street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. The landscaping between the parking area and the street property line is 10 feet. Buffering, screening and setbacks are addressed later in this decision and the applicant has included an extensive care program for the landscaping associated with this project. Therefore, based on the completion of the following condition, the applicant may increase the lot coverage to 80%. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Industrial Zoning Standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 6 OF 20 CONDITION:Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Plans indicate that a walkway extends from the ground floor entrance of the existing 21,000 square foot building to the sidewalk abutting SW Durham. To insure that the walkway will be available, a crossover easement will need to be recorded. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The existing walkway crosses a vehicle access by 24 feet. The walkway is stripped with appropriate pavement markings. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plans show the walkway paved with a hard surface material. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with less than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot access with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development will have less that 100 parking spaces and has 2 points of access into the parking lot off of SW Durham Road. Because the existing 21,000 square foot building and the 10,320 square foot addition is being reviewed as one project, a cross over easement will need to be recorded where the two tax lots abut to the north and south of the projects. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the access and egress standards have not been satisfied. If the applicant complies with the condition below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 7 OF 20 Street trees have already been addressed. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.050 states that buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses, which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Table 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as a specified in the matrix. The proposed construction is for an office/manufacturing building, which is allowed outright in the I-P zone. This parcel abuts R-12 zoned land to the west side of the property, and I-P to the east and south. According to the buffer matrix for the parking area, a Type C buffer is required next to a residential zoned property (west property line). As shown on the landscape plan, the applicant has provided screening equal to a D-2 buffer which includes 15 feet of landscaping along the west side of the property, with a 4.5 foot high decorative rock wall and a 6-foot chain link fence to provide the required screening. Therefore, this standard has been met. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. 37 parking spaces are proposed on the west side of the property. According to the standard, 5 parking lot trees are required. The applicant has provided 6 parking lot trees, 4, 8-inch Vine Maples and 2, Pin Oaks. The applicant has positioned 2 of the required trees on 6-foot landscaped islands and has created a larger 18-foot landscaped island with 2, 11,4-inch Royal Red Maples, 5, five-gallon Doublefile Viburnum and 6, five-gallon Viburnums. However, all trees must be planted with a 2-inch caliper or greater. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit a plan showing all trees to be 2-inches in caliper or greater. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; All gas meters and other service facilities are located within the landscaped areas except the refuse container, which is addressed below. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The applicant's plans show service facilities to be located at the southwest end of the lot and screened with 6-foot concrete walls and chain link fence. The facility is separated from the proposed truck parking area with a 4-foot island with 3, two-gallon Shrub Rose. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 8 OF 20 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met. CONDITION: The applicant will be conditioned to submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not provided information pertaining to any one of the four methods to demonstrate compliance with this chapter. Therefore, the applicant will be required to address one the four methods mentioned above. Location standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The location of the proposed refuse container is not in a required front yard and is centrally located for all users. The proposed location is not within a parking area. The applicant has not provided a service provider letter from the franchise hauler. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to submit verification that the franchise hauler approves the container and placement. Design standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not submitted detail of the trash enclosure or refuse container. The applicant must submit details addressing the design standards in order for Staff to determine that this standard has been met. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclable design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 9 OF 20 CONDITIONS: Submit narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Design Standards. Submit verification letter that the franchise hauler approves of the refuse container and location. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Vehicle Parking Plan Requirements: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision. Loading/Unloading Driveways: A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. This application does not include a school or a meeting facility. Therefore, this standard does not apply. On-Site Vehicle Stacking For Drive-In Use: All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1 of the Development Code. No drive-in is associated with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Curb Cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Curb cuts will be discussed later in this decision. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. The site plan does not indicated a grade separation between the existing parking area of tax lot 200 and 300. Therefore, no preventive barriers will be required. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 10 OF 20 Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area can not be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's site plan does not indicate that wheel stops will be provided for those parking stalls that abut the boundary of the development or those stalls at the front of the proposed building and on the west side that abut the pedestrian walkways. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to have wheel stops that are at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of those parking stall mentioned. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The plans show the parking stalls to be 9 feet by 18.5 feet without extending into landscaped areas, which meets the minimum requirement for standard parking stalls. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. The applicant has provided six (6) bicycle parking spaces at the southeast corner of the building. The spaces are within 50 feet of an entrance, however, the spaces can not be seen from the street. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to provide directional signs from the front of the building. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765:050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material i.e., pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 11 OF 20 The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used. Therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Table 18.765.2 states that for Office, 0.5 bicycle parking spaces are required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The building has approximately 5,676 square feet of office space. Table 18.765.2 also states that bicycle parking is required for warehouse and light industrial square footage. Based on the calculations of these uses associated with this addition, no bicycle spaces are required. Therefore, only 3 bicycle parking stalls are required. The applicant has provided 7. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. According to the applicant, no tenants have been identified at this time, but assumptions have been made in order to estimate the square footage of the anticipated occupancy types, which were used to develop the required parking spaces. A break down of estimated square footages is as follows: Office = (2.7/1000), therefore, (5,676 sq. ft. = 15 spaces). Warehouse = (0.5/1000), therefore, (3,096 sq. ft. = 1.5 spaces). Light Industrial = (1.6/1000), therefore, (1,548 sq. ft. = 2.5 spaces). According to the estimated square footage of each use, this addition requires only 19 parking stalls. The applicant has provided a total of 37 parking stalls. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed addition is 10,320 square feet. The plans provide one truck parking stall and one "truck maneuvering staging area." According to the City Engineer, the loading and maneuvering space meets City specifications. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met. CONDITIONS: • Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. • Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. • Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 12 OF 20 No signs are associated with this application. However, any sign will need to be approved by future applications for sign permits. Therefore, this standard has been deferred until time of application. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Sign standards can be deferred until time of application. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790 030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees identification o a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the arborist report submitted, 236.5 inches of Sequoias were removed from the proposed site. The owner has replanted 114.6 inches of Sequoias along the perimeter of the project and 187 inches of trees within the landscaped areas of the project totaling 301.6 inches — 65.1 inches in excess of the combined diameters of the trees being removed. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Tree Removal criteria have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting.right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight.(81 feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant does not propose anything to be constructed in the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (underlying zone); Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 13 OF 20 The applicant's plans have considered the natural environment on the site by locating the building as far away from the residential zone abutting the west side of the subject property without sacrificing the intent of the project. Out of the 12 existing trees on the property, 11 are to be relocated. 100-year floodplain Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/ bicycle plan. No landfill or development is being done within a floodplain. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are oriented towards the entrance of the building. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this project and has no objection to it. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Public transit is available on SW Durham Road and pedestrian access to SW Durham has been provided via walkway connections. Drainage: All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan; Drainage will be discussed under the Street and Utility Section below. Provision for the disabled: All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447; For this project, 2 disabled parking spaces are required and the applicant has provided 2 spaces that are 9 feet wide and 8-foot access isle. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 14 OF 20 TABLE 18.530.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN INDUSTRIAL ZONES STANDARD I-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 47,261 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 149 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 35 ft. 117 sq. ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots [1] 20 ft. - - Side yard 0/50 ft. [3] 63 ft. - Rear yard 0/50 ft. [3][4] 96 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a public or private street -- - Maximum Height 45 ft. 27 ft. Maximum Site Coverage [2] 75 % [5] 77% Maximum Landscape Requirement 25 % [6] 23% [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills neighborhood shall comply with Policy 11.5.1. [5]Maximum site coverage may be increased to 80%if the provisions of Section 18.530.050B are satisfied. [6] Except that a reduction to 20%of the site may be approved through the site development review process. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards have been fully met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as aportion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 60 to 90-foot right-of-way width and a 40-foot minimum paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Durham Road, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 30 to 35 feet of right-of-way (ROW) from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should ensure that there is a minimum of 35 feet of ROW as suggested by the applicant's plan. If there is less than 35 feet from centerline, the applicant must dedicate additional ROW. SW Durham Road is currently improved with curb and sidewalk in this area. The City recently completed a traffic signal at the intersection of SW Durham Road and SW 79 Avenue, across from the proposed driveway. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should add street trees along the frontage of the site and make any necessary modifications to the traffic signal and controllers to accommodate the new driveway. The applicant will also need to close an existing driveway adjacent to the western property boundary in order to construct the new driveway across from SW 79t Avenue. The old driveway apron shall be removed and new curb and sidewalk shall be installed in its place. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 15 OF 20 Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There are existing sidewalks on SW Durham Road. No additional sidewalk work is needed, except for what is needed to fill in for the old driveway approach at the western property boundary. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's plans indicate the new building will be served from an existing 6-inch sanitary sewer stub that was provided to this site. The applicant's contractor will need to verify the location of that lateral prior to connection. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The project plan will not negatively impact the upstream drainage basin because the upstream area is accommodated by the storm system in SW Reiling Street. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage agency in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan is not clear as to how onsite detention will be provided. Stormwater treatment is adequately addressed, but the 25-year detention does not appear to be addressed. There is adequate space on this site to accommodate at least below-grade detention, so Staff is confident that this standard can be met. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate how they will meet the onsite detention requirement. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 16 OF 20 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining Proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeway is associated with this project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. All overhead utility lines along SW Durham Road were placed underground as a part of the recent improvement. No additional requirements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: The applicant proposes to extend the existing onsite water system to serve the new building. If any public water line work is necessary, it must be covered by a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department and must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 17 OF 20 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the USA Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant intends to install a manufactured unit made by StormTreat Systems, Inc. This type of facility has been approved by the City on prior projects because the manufacturer information shows that these systems will achieve the total phosphorus removal required by the USA standards. To ensure compliance with Unified Sewerage Agency design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: USA Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per USA regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. A grading plan shall be submitted with the building plan submittal. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. D. Impact Study (18.390) Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 18 OF 20 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $21,311 based on the 5,676 square feet of office, 3,096 square feet of warehouse and 1,548 square feet of light industrial proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $66,597 ($21,311 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $45,285.87. The applicant has been required by the Engineering Department to plant street trees and fill in an old driveway approach with a new curb and sidewalk. Based on the cost of these improvements, the requirements are more than roughly proportional to the unmitigated impacts. At most the applicant would be required to dedicate no more than 5 feet of right-of-way at 12 dollars per linear foot, for a value of $8,940 thus it is easily roughly proportional to the unmitigated impact of $45,285.87. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Move new hydrant 200 feet south and 40 feet east. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Operations Department comments were received in the form of a letter concerning procedural issues related to tree removal. STAFF RESPONSE: Discussions were conducted via telephone conversations. The City of Tigard Utility Manager has reviewed this application and offered the following comments: Since this is an addition to an existing building, we will not require a separate domestic water for the new addition. e will, however, want to make sure that the existing 1-inch meter is capable of meeting all service requirements. Applicant will need to provide the Water Division, the water usage calculations for both existing building and proposed addition. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Unified Sewerage Agency comments were received in the form of a letter. Staff Response: USA's issues have been addressed under the street and utility NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 19 OF 20 improvement section of this decision. Portland General Electric has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 13, 2000, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. T�A eal: cision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 2000. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. ���� i November 13, 2000 PRE A a B : Mathe cheidegger DATE As ' ant Planner i ✓ rh fy November 13, 2000 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Bewe ,dorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2000-00016.dec.doc.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PAGE 20 OF 20 I W W t -.-.-- - -N'�/ • i� _ SW DURHAM ROAD Amfr O.1 111 .hi•.'...• Mtn.MAYA •111111111.111Pr. 1.1 44111111111” 4111.11.11211:4111.1 tK.tt-14 r pM..r..ty/11 �� •' jig- � laillt � ° � a:i / � � as ti: .i./ :. — l'4--.---11,--- •4......-r0 F.- s •004 i lwc.fA•t X — — xwlc SR • 'Q CiiHOY.�Wiif55:C4/494AIIMSKI•MI s 1SWIIII IIIII•EINONS.1MIMMMMMMrMI L. 4. It r,t�!€1.�'.iR�oE�•�■ ■ — .�/�f1ig17PFm J K -�?1 --� I d C.. VI .....T.MM'•CR •- .. .Yx t0.41•V1 rb•Wf , 1. al . - 14,411-14 O.7_1ot Iwo. 4•x.4.aa I. 1111110 ry. 'j{��. pan.•,•,=1444 y. C /tiT A'+O� 1.0,-.0..04.10.,t.4 11404 60• .•' r V. Lo.w.wltor • l ' r ctTAT 141 •L t d I� •,I i. . w . .rui �ur.ruti�.�ur L •1%'• %+ S' 1l\li\`'ell l\\\•a r —•1111181`••.1 •�� • ! -i fig it • -Q ii ! rLwo 1 • :. l W.4r 1. 41r at,Y v 0 v 41N nor Lnrt • n.•.ao.wll.w x ',tee..•4x• oo1.s rr ( a •0140.44 -- :A. litmle II . :•....s....a•I w - PROPOSED EXISINo A.aA - CITY OF TIGARD SDR2000-000 I 6 CITY Of TIGARD SITE PLAN N JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION (Map is not to scale) A.j p.loyA i■I♦INEIIIIIMIIM11a • CITY of TIGARD I GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM _rev LIP 1 I�; rip A. VICINITY MAP 1 TR E N �- `°� P �_ SDR2000-00016 l0 U Pq LN liiiiiw JACKSON soRMI11 - - - I . .---- BUSINESS �s I ti Iiiiil111lii � CENTER CO To- 1 /� ADDITION ., o= 0 DURHAM RD w Off ,■ --- , :--;,,, .‘4 > „„.„::,„:,,,,.. ..,_ ,k,-,,,,,.,i§ , - \ ,_ .,N,,,,.„, ,... .,.., .„„:„:„,...„,,,,.,. SIT :` a ■ tip'* s 1' 4 04? AN /..' L ■ JQQF,�` O o 100 200 300 400 500 F..1 G r=ale feet �� , ,I I,Nl City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and _ should he venhed with the Developmnt Services Division. A/Ad do 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http://wwwci.tigardor.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2000; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR EXH` Nicoli Engineering SDR2000-000161MIS2000-00007 Attn: Jim Andrews, Project Manager JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PO Box 23784 FULL DECISION Tigard, OR 97281 David Metzger PO Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 Merry Callahan 7895 SW Bond Street Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING „.... .„. CITY OF n3ARD Community(Development Shaping (Better Community STAA. OE OREGON- ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specia(tst II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} O NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2000-00016/MIS2000-00007 -JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION E AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: . • _ / AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: _ 1 AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) (Date of Publc Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council E NOTICE OF: (Type/Knd of Notice) FOR: I (File No./Name Reference) oaie or Public Hearing,if appihcabie) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICEISI of which is attached, m. -es hihit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"c”, on November 13 000 and ' '•osited ; the United States Mail on November 13,2000, postage prepaid. w m (Person at Prepared •tice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 r0( day of r �D/ .0!'-T',• OFFICIAL SEAL ROTA PUBLIC OF 0' ¢°- . ,_,, DIANE M JELDERKS `\ NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON My Commission Exp res: 9/0 5 COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 EXIT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 .1i CITY OF TIGARD LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 2000-00007 community DeveI pment Sfiapmg Better Community JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION 120 DAYS = 1/18/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION CASE NOS.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2000-00016 Lot Line Adjustment (MIS) MIS2000-00007 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building and Lot Line Adjustment approval to adjust the eastern lot line to include 8,277 square feet. OWNER: David Metzger APPLICANT: Nicoli Engineering P.O. Box 275 Jim Andrews, Project Mgr. Sherwood, OR 97140 9025 SW Center Street PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300 and 7800 SW Durham Road; WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g. noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well-integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.410, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 13, 2000 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 30, 2000 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 29, 2000. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. W■ SW DURHAM ROAD c. is 1 t?ice t , _ , 1 `�b _. rhiormili =MX )1 _pi • La : -..---- 1-1 , _L. L.,_ t . • q.�1' ' �!'uiwiE'�1 ....■ riii III ~MO p.n. p CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2000-00016 SITE PLAN N JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION SMap is not to scale) ai ��- VICINITY MAP iES ST L', 1 �� �-� 'e�w _ 1J � �= SDR2000-00016 _ CNNtG4LL WY 1 PA7Tl LN -T"—a _ JACKSON - i eoNO T J M IIII,� BUSINESS V MEM CENTER m < ADDITION /AMDURHAM nc - .j, :41F4 SIT t \ 40 N Aiddigt, :.. \ 1 1,in Yot Cay of Tigard Mit ................m* SDR • -00 61 EXW• 2S112CD D4300 25112CD-02400 BATES CHRIS& FLECKER ROBERT H STOLTZ SHANNON 16707 GRAEF CIR 7870 SW BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 23 1 12CD-04200 2S 112CD-03800 BENGE STANLEY C&MARLYS S GIRTMAN OPAL B TR 7850 SW BOND ST 22 GRAVATT DR TIGARD,OR 97223 BERKLEY,CA 94705 2S 112CD-04000 2S 112CD-05300 BERG&OLDHAM INVESTMENTS LLC GOLDBERG LAURA D 4035 DOUGLAS WAY 7963 BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 25112CD-01300 2S 112CD-05600 BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M GONZALES BARBARA LEE/CARLOS 10525 SW TIGARD ST 7915 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02100 2S 113BA-00400 CARLO JAMES J& HAMBACH MICHAEL V& CALLAHAN MERRY A SATTLER SANDRA E& 7895 SW BOND ST BROWN LORENE TIGARD,OR 97224 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 25112CD-04900 2S 112CD-01000 CARR ANNE M HAMBACH MILDRED 7980 SW BOND ST 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-04500 2S112CD-04700 COUTURE ROBERT E&TRISH S HEIDER RICHARD R AND PO BOX 3273 LAURELEI M ARLINGTON,WA 98223 7948 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02500 2S 112CC-02000 DANAHY L SUSAN HOFFART HERBERT J 7785 SW BOND STREET 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 112CC-04800 2S 112CC-01900 DUSKIN GREG A&CAROL A HOFFART HERBERT J 7998 SW BOND 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 112C0-05500 2S 112CD-01200 ELISARA TOGAMAU T& HOFFART HERBERT J ELISAA TRACY C 4632 SW VERMONT ST 7931 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 • • 2S112CDv-02300 2S112CD-03900 HOFFMAN JUDITH A QUINN ROBERT D 7865 SW BOND ST 2105 PEREGINE TIGARD,OR 97224 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 112CC-04900 2S 112CD-04800 JOHNSON BRADLEY A/PAULA C RACANELLI ROCKY AND DENISE 8000 SW BOND 7964 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 113BA-00100 2S 112CD-05201 JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST THE RAY MICHAEL D/DIANA L BY CARL H JOHNSON TR 7979 SW BOND ST 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 1 12CD-03700 2S 112CD-02600 KOOPMAN DEVIN P SANDLIN SHEREE DIANE 7720 SW BOND ST 7765 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-05000 2S 112CD-04400 LAMOTT GENE P&CHANZE H SCHNEPF ROBERT W/MIRIAM A 3467 CASCADE TER 15880 SW 79TH WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CD-03600 2S112CD-01100 LEBEDA VLASTIMIL/SHARON SCHOEWE DALE D 15607 SW HIGH PIONT DR 7925 SW DURHAM ROAD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113BA-00300 2S113B0-00300 METZGER DAVID SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 7910 SW DURHAM RD 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97123 2S113BA-00200 2S 112CD-04100 METZGER DAVID G/DIANNE S SIMONS GLEN H PO BOX 400 HEALY JEAN M SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PO BOX 5996 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S 112CD-05400 2S112CD-04600 ONTHANK SONJA R SMITH JOHN WILLIAM 7947 SW BOND ST 7932 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 113BA-00500 2S 112CD-02200 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SNIDER JASON B&JODI J do TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 7885 SW BOND DISTRICT#23J TIGARD,OR 97224 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S113BA1 00401 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 13BA-00600 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 150 N FIRST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S 112CD-03500 WAGNER ERNST J 7680 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 w w Sally Christensen Bill Finck 15685 SW 76th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 91223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100 Avenue i:\curpin\setup\Iabels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Debra Muir 15065 SW 79th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING O n CITY of , Community(Development SffapingA Better Community STATE.OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2000-00016/JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER FOR: AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearings) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ NOTICE OF: (TypeJKind of Notice) FOR: ._ — I (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing.if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, m• e• Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked FFIhibit' ",on Se) _mbe i 00,ci de•'sited in the United States Mail on September 21,2000, postage prepaid. idar .�! J.! 'er - 'hat P -pared • ice) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the /0 day of °e t- • , 2000. • .11O 146F OREG N fi•; SHERMAN S.CASE[R NOTARY PUBLIC.-t} I'N My Commission Expires: ZtW' -"I" COMMISSION N0.32347RF_G9 1711 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 13,2003 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI. _-DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION Ab, NO SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community'Deve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: September 27, 2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 FILE NAME: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON OCTOBER 11. 2000. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2. 2000. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the . .s for an appeal to the Tigard Plan Commission must address the 'relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." �1 -L' a CITY of TIGARD ,,' '� VICINITY MAP_____ , __ _ �r , , =; SDR2000-000I6 IIIURELN ¢ U 1 1111111 cl- ■ r•ul1111111111111 X1111111111111 CENTER „me - ADDITION DURHAM RD a ,■ , • r51TEI \ F ,a I • I * N 0 N't 411 r 1 City of Tigard wma o..m .im/...,.a 1•..a 00■ EXH1 2S 112CD`04300 2S112CD-02400 BATES CHRIS& FLECKER ROBERT H STOLTZ SHANNON 16707 GRAEF CIR 7870 SW BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-04200 2S 112CD-03800 BENGE STANLEY C&MARLYS S GIRTMAN OPAL B TR 7850 SW BOND ST 22 GRAVATT DR TIGARD,OR 97223 BERKLEY,CA 94705 25 112CD-04000 2S 112CD-05300 BERG&OLDHAM INVESTMENTS LLC GOLDBERG LAURA D 4035 DOUGLAS WAY 7963 BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-01300 2S 112CD-05600 BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M GONZALES BARBARA LEE/CARLOS 10525 SW TIGARD ST 7915 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02100 2S 113BA-00400 CARLO JAMES J& HAMBACH MICHAEL V& CALLAHAN MERRY A SATTLER SANDRA E& 7895 SW BOND ST BROWN LORENE TIGARD,OR 97224 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-04900 2S 112CD-01000 CARR ANNE M HAMBACH MILDRED 7980 SW BOND ST 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-04500 2S 112CD-04700 COUTURE ROBERT E&TRISH S HEIDER RICHARD R AND PO BOX 3273 LAURELEI M ARLINGTON,WA 98223 7948 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02500 2S112CC-02000 DANAHY L SUSAN HOFFART HERBERT J 7785 SW BOND STREET 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 112CC-04800 2S 112CC-01900 DUSKIN GREG A&CAROL A HOFFART HERBERT J 7998 SW BOND 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S 112CD-05500 2S 112CD-01200 ELISARA TOGAMAU T& HOFFART HERBERT J ELISAA TRACY C 4632 SW VERMONT ST 7931 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 112CD-02300 2S 112CD-03900 HOFFMAN JUDITH A QUINN ROBERT D 7865 SW BOND ST 2105 PEREGINE TIGARD,OR 97224 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 112CC-04900 2S 112CD-04800 JOHNSON BRADLEY A/PAULA C RACANELLI ROCKY AND DENISE 8000 SW BOND 7964 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1138A-00100 2S 112CD-05201 JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST THE RAY MICHAEL D/DIANA L BY CARL H JOHNSON TR 7979 SW BOND ST 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-03700 2S 112CD-02600 KOOPMAN DEVIN P SANDLIN SHEREE DIANE 7720 SW BOND ST 7765 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-05000 2S 112CD-04400 LAMOTT GENE P&CHANZE H SCHNEPF ROBERT W/MIRIAM A 3467 CASCADE TER 15880 SW 79TH WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-03600 2S 112CD-01100 LEBEDA VLASTIMIUSHARON SCHOEWE DALE D 15607 SW HIGH PIONT DR 7925 SW DURHAM ROAD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 113BA-00300 2511380-00300 METZGER DAVID SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 7910 SW DURHAM RD 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97123 2S 113BA-00200 2S 112CD-04100 METZGER DAVID G/DIANNE S SIMONS GLEN H PO BOX 400 HEALY JEAN M SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PO BOX 5996 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S 112CD-05400 2S 112CD-04600 ONTHANK SONJA R SMITH JOHN WILLIAM 7947 SW BOND ST 7932 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S113BA-00500 2S1 12C D-02200 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SNIDER JASON B&JODI J Go TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 7885 SW BOND DISTRICT#23J TIGARD,OR 97224 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113BA 00401 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 113BA-00600 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 150 N FIRST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S 112CD-03500 WAGNER ERNST J 7680 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 Sally Christensen Bill finck 15685 SW 16th Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 91224 Mary Ann Melvin Kristen Miller 10395 SW Bonanza Way 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 91224 Tigard, OR 97223 Stephen Bicker CITY OF TIGARD 14235 SW 97th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Mark Bogert 14445 SW 100 Avenue i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc UPDATED: 9-Jun-00 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady 9360 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97223 Debra Muir 1 5065 SW 79th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold 15374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. #3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping, Better Community DATE: September 21,2000 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3111 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2000-00016 JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small- scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition to mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 2. 2000. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Cease provufe thefolrowing information)Name of Persontsl Commenting: I Phone Numbertsl: I CI1alF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMIS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NO[S).: S' 2� -- ) /c . FILE NAME[S]: 777:xr-e, ' c c r : {> r CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS I4-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: Central ❑ East ❑ South E West ❑ Li Also Place For Review in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./Dvlpmnt.Svcs.Technicians _ POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official Ix ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer , WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,Utilities Manager CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder s.0 OPERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,Property Manager ✓ PLANNER—TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE! SPECIAL DISTRICTS __ TUAL. HILLS PARK&REC. DIST.s& TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE * TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT * UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY * Planning Manager fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 115 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 91006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 91075 Hillsboro,OR 91124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON ♦ - CITY OF TUALATIN * OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PowertinesinArea) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N. First Avenue CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(cPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion(cPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGAfuRa) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy icAruRe) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir Regional Administrator Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) f Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(cPA2cA)MS 14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(zcAi Ms 14 ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 13-Jul-00) Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I. Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within V.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Michael Kiser,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Lori Dorney, Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: ORO3O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps E of HalVN.of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 ♦INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATLONJLLCOHPLIANCE WITNJNTERGOYERNMEKTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). . CITY of TIGARD •,4 LN GE OCR�PRIC INFORMATION SYSTEM gioss$1111M en9 a99 ran COO 600 AREA NOTIFIED la .� zsnlcootmo lsnscootaoo MI6 III +0� _r, - 5900 2S112C002100 031120001500, _ �w (500') 11111e= 7S112C004100 751120003800 t0112C0035B� 131120004000 YS112C008700 =■ Sill ` ;y.,,y' 2$1110004200 131110008900 131120008600 IG U) SDR2000-00016 DURHAM RD JACKSON fI a ... BUSINESS SITE ... . , .4.,(., ‘,..41 CENTER `*��`� ��: ADDITION. ........ .. ... ..N . ...: :_, . . ,s, . ,?5030500300 18n30A00400 L1 '‘‘)1 / ty,Q4i iw aru • 5 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fe l�tIMM11�! 1"=378 feel .si IIl City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 — --_. s�-- I -- ---— (503)639-4171 htip:f/YNNYY.CI.tlglfd.Of.Ue gt , Community Development Plot date:Sep 26,2000;C:ImagicWIAGIC03.APR 2S 112CD-04300 2S 112CD-02400 BATES CHRIS& FLECKER ROBERT H STOLTZ SHANNON 16707 GRAEF CIR 7870 SW BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-04200 2S 112CD-03800 BENGE STANLEY C&MARLYS S GIRTMAN OPAL B TR 7850 SW BOND ST 22 GRAVATT DR TIGARD,OR 97223 BERKLEY,CA 94705 2S1 12C D-04000 2S1 12C D-05300 BERG&OLDHAM INVESTMENTS LLC GOLDBERG LAURA D 4035 DOUGLAS WAY 7963 BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-01300 2S 112CD-05600 BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M GONZALES BARBARA LEE/CARLOS 10525 SW TIGARD ST 7915 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02100 2S 113BA-00400 CARLO JAMES J& HAMBACH MICHAEL V& CALLAHAN MERRY A SATTLER SANDRA E& 7895 SW BOND ST BROWN LORENE TIGARD, OR 97224 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 12C D-04900 2S 112CD-01000 CARR ANNE M HAMBACH MILDRED 7980 SW BOND ST 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112C0-04500 2S 112CD-04700 COUTURE ROBERT E&TRISH S HEIDER RICHARD R AND PO BOX 3273 LAURELEI M ARLINGTON,WA 98223 7948 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112C D-02500 2S1 12CC-02000 DANAHY L SUSAN HOFFART HERBERT J 7785 SW BOND STREET 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1 12C C-04800 2S 112CC-01900 DUSKIN GREG A&CAROL A HOFFART HERBERT J 7998 SW BOND 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD, OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1 12CD-05500 2S11200-01200 ELISARA TOGAMAU T& HOFFART HERBERT J ELISAA TRACY C 4632 SW VERMONT ST 7931 SW BOND ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-02300 2S 112CD-03900 HOFFMAN JUDITH A QUINN ROBERT D 7865 SW BOND ST 2105 PEREGINE TIGARD, OR 97224 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2511200-04900 2S 112CD-04800 JOHNSON BRADLEY A/PAULA C RACANELLI ROCKY AND DENISE 8000 SW BOND 7964 SW BOND ST TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 13B A-00100 2S1 120 D-05201 JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST THE RAY MICHAEL D/DIANA L BY CARL H JOHNSON TR 7979 SW BOND ST 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112C0-03700 281120D-02600 KOOPMAN DEVIN P SANDLIN SHEREE DIANE 7720 SW BOND ST 7765 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 12C D-05000 2S 112CD-04400 LAMOTT GENE P&CHANZE H SCHNEPF ROBERT W/MIRIAM A 3467 CASCADE TER 15880 SW 79TH WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 11200-03600 2S1 120 D-01100 LEBEDA VLASTIMIL/SHARON SCHOEWE DALE D 15607 SW HIGH PIONT DR 7925 SW DURHAM ROAD SHERWOOD, OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113BA-00300 2S11380-00300 METZGER DAVID SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 7910 SW DURHAM RD 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97123 2S 113BA-00200 2S 11200-04100 METZGER DAVID G/DIANNE S SIMONS GLEN H PO BOX 400 HEALY JEAN M SHERWOOD, OR 97140 PO BOX 5996 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S1 1200-05400 2S 11200-04600 ONTHANK SONJA R SMITH JOHN WILLIAM 7947 SW BOND ST 7932 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 113BA-00500 2S 11200-02200 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SNIDER JASON B&JODI J c/o TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL 7885 SW BOND DISTRICT#23J TIGARD,OR 97224 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113gA`0�4ot T/GpRO NO 23✓ School D/STRICT T/GAR�O r'ACI HwY R 97223 23 2S1 UNIFIED° SEWERAGE H/�l gpROTOR AGENCY g7123 2S112 C0-03500 03500 ER ERNST 3 ?080 S oR 9 T/GAR 7 24 APPLICANT MATERIALS 1 . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 4:iit TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: KVP g iz DATE OF PRE-APP.: 9•)t:no Property Address/Location(s): 9 b . tUt2-1--1, FOR STAFF USE ONLY �l1aAl2b / n!2 1 1223 Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): I 13 BA Case No.(s): 0 Other Case No.(s): Site Size: �� �(,� 5.�. Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: bsLy t p I`'(tz12-G, Date: Address: Q. 0. t3bOA 2i S Phone: City: 1-M12.64 nob Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: t7AV t D 1cTZG,'�� Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: Oity: Zip: CIT Area: When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser cvrecord or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 i:\curpinlmasterslsdra.doc vyith written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS r.pplication. _y' Neighbor hv�( 1Q-t f�t�nui�srLfs�J ✓ Application Elementsubmitted: PROPOSAL SUMMARY a` Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed • 60 ge7T-t i-v-T Pk l D 32 D �,�, A. 1 T tibt� ❑ Site/Plot Plan / (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Ta Ate CXt 7T11y 61 21 t 000 s.F. ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/7"x 11") AN P SITE ►M ptzoy, M>vkT 7. Q' Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app ch k list) I?�u1LX)11'4b► j5 5f ar. L.AT1\1 E✓; Nv 2" Construction Cost Estimat ��0rD00 EK,k-►yT13 Hp.'J E EK IDEIATl Ft j) ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped L.jA - Uc HD N(,atiI.tU Legal Size Envelopes (5/1.`/-)y)'"4 4 ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999.999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 l( rt s kof Le..the(s — eE (t - frnM Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:06/28/2000 11:13 User: front Station: 02 Operator: DLH Rcpt No: 0003327 Date: 06/28/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 1,600.00 Name: NICOLI ENGINEERING Cash: 0.00 Address: P.O. BOX 23784 Check: 1,600.00 TIGARD, OR 97281 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 1,600.00 C /sY& / CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development .Sgaping)7(Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION • 120 DAYS = 1/18/2000 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2000-00016 o-r-LIME/-}-zT1,6711 WI" (1U I. (9oo0-DO00I FILE TITLE: JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION APPLICANT: Nicoli Engineering OWNER: David Metzger Attn: Jim Andrews, Project Manager PO Box 275 9025 SW Center Street Sherwood, OR 97140 PO Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 PHONE/FAX: 503-620-2086/503-684-3636 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a 10,320 square foot addition to an existing 21 ,000 square foot building. LOCATION: 7910 SW Durham Road, WCTM 2S113BA, Tax Lot 00300. ZONE: I-P; Industrial Park. The I-P zoning district provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing, office and small-scale commercial uses, e.g., restaurants, personal services and fitness centers, in a campus-like setting. Only those light industrial uses with no off-site impacts, e.g., noise, glare, odor, vibration, are permitted in the I-P zone. In addition ti, mandatory site development review, design and development standards in the I-P zone have been adopted to insure that developments will be well integrated, attractively landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.530, 18.705, 18.745, CRITERIA: 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ❑ TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: OCTOBER I.1 2000 HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM 1 PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM iCITY COUNCIL (TOES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 2, 2000 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ❑ LANDSCAPING PLAN ® ARBORIST REPORT ® SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ® TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ❑ GEOTECH REPORT OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 317 n CITY OF TIGARD EXPENDITURE REQUEST a PY This form is a multi-use form. Appropriate receipts and documentation must be attached to this form. Approved request due Monday 5:00 PM to A/P for checks by Friday. VENDOR NO.: DATE: June 13, 2002 PAYABLE TO : David Metzger Construction Inc. REQUESTED BY: Jerree Gaynor PO Box 400 Sherwood,OR 97140 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES: Date Description, Invoice No.,etc. Account No. Amount 6/13/02 Refund of landscaping deposit- 100-0000-229000 $1,000.00 Jackson Business Center, 7800 SW Durham; Receipt#00-321753 1P..2Bn4—00/5//v TOTAL $1,000.00 Mileage 36.5(t APPROPRIATION BALANCE: AS OF: PURCHASING: APPROVALS: (IF UNDER$50) Section Manager/Professional Staff (IF UNDER$2500) Division Manager (IF UNDER$7500) Department Manager (IF UNDER$25000) City Administrator (IF OVER$25000) Local Contract Review Board July 28, 2000 rya* Jim Andrews CITY OF TIGARD Nicoli Engineering OREGON P.O. Box 23784 9025 SW Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97281 RE: Jackson Business Center Addition SDR 2000-00016 Incompleteness letter Dear Jim: The City of Tigard is in receipt of your application submitted on June 28, 2000. After a preliminary review of the application submittal items, Staff has determined that this application is incomplete. The following items are necessary in order to deem the application complete: 1) Preliminary sizing calculation of the water quality facility and/or detention. 2) Tree Plan as required per Section 18.790.030 of the Tigard Community Development code. I understand that you are intending to submit a Type I Minor Modification application for the relocation of the large Sequoia trees so that this work can be accomplished this summer. Please be aware that, in addition, a Tree Plan is required for the planting, removal and protection of all the existing trees on Tax Lot 300 (7190 SW Durham). Both the Type I Minor Mod and the Tree Plan for the Type II Site Development Review require that the tree plans be prepared by a certified arborist. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x 315. Yours truly, Q,Cc-yt Kar Fox Associate Planner C: Land Use Casefile No. SDR2000-00016 David Metzger, P.O. Box 275, Sherwood, OR I:curpin\karen\sdr\sdr00-16inc.doc 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 t/6 6.-„Lee.�` - ;A"ce,so fileb/-4; erm41 to//74 rda/c4 ds N� (11A5' cc_v2ex_fed 3 �&ci GAL 6c-c. C : _��/ct j . —.� elf€e''" ,44., at i per gee Pe.vvvocia.52 gicualc..d_ Lc) eLkop A. fl b wi'11 M VAAL U.sectit Ulo Get bvc s-r r- 14- ge-Atzfe-0 aze/i4t- /A- /74-..,_a 4--teGo { Vt�c �o L5/Cue ye&ce/ ef"hAa A c «4f-lirc. ,.ems 8',S3 d.So8. - 1 - /f- S3a - OSG , -'7 he ( ndle(� > a `> ::, PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CHECKLIST Project: j"4-50,1 6 SS ( rs2 Aoorcy.i, FOR Date: —11Mo LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS ❑ COMPLETE P4VCOMPLETE GRADING �✓ Existing and proposed contours shown? M Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes R✓No C✓ Adjacent parcel grades shown? R ET ISSUES —1( �.,31-.. Right-of-way clearly shown? , .. Centerline of street clearly shown? E .1" . Name of street(s) shown? Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? Profiles of proposed streets ,Ef-t-\/* Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) ❑ profiles ❑ topo shown on adjacent property? C Pit-11P- Traffic study required/submitted? -' Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? Et Widths of proposed public streets shown? Widths of streets appropriate? j:].t.J1A Are private streets proposed? ❑ under 6 lot minimum? ❑ width appropriate? [Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES I '-I' Existing/proposed lines shown? Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES ^/ Existing/proposed lines? I �C Existing/proposed fire hydrants? STQRM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES Z. Existing/proposed lines? (ED Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention provided? D`D N1/r 54645 At->,/-r C? Water quality and/or detention facility shown on plan? f ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? , SP- Stubs to adjacent properties required? E r Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? is\eng\brianr\nasters\public facility plan checklist.doc REVISED: 06/19/00 Ss, ices/ pu'iu/ S �O 5c O.RdivAc-1) Ja �. o e:._ w� �. %-k yp — S D . cep� h Ct a ke,c46.0 con.pc'we-tx.44— 7i-ce P/Aik at'aled 7/VO4) ./z) ezia/.5,174.66c./ ie /cA4161).A.e,1 70 67' /3 i'ree OA ,i /A /A24e5) -0736-.5- /nCV-4-c rcS 1)e. .7-104.5aairivi ;fe Reee4cfli Irefrptoplec.44ifeci /0 Se i_.(.40/a toluut. LU-GLL OALL4 2 _ I t.; 4,-.• - CASE NOTES FILE COpy INCIDENT/SUMMONS DATE: Friday, January 8, 2000 OWNER NAME: Davis q etzger ADDRESS: 7801 & 0 SW Du .am (Add date ea, • u'date.) Monday, March 13, 2000 ---- two items are still lacking that are required to complete and final the permit for the shell building: Final Summary Letters from Carlson Testing on 1) soil compaction and 2) on-site welding. Written NOV was mailed 1/28 with constructive service Tues, 2/1. Thus, as of Tuesday, 3/14, 42 days have passed without compliance. At $250 per day, the maximum penalty would be $10,500. Preparing Summons & Complaint documents for issuance 3/14 for Occupancy without final inspection and approval (Shell) and Occupancy without Certificate of Occupancy (T.I.), adding these cases to that already scheduled for 3/28 on 7910 Durham. Wednesday, March 22, 2000 A/o 10:30 am, nothing yet received by mail or fax on the sole item remaining on the shell building - final summary letter from Carlson re soil compaction. Advised Metzger at 10:50. He advised me Tuesday that he had the material he needed from Washington County re the fill and the SIT permit for 7910 Durham but that his engineer, Jim Andrews, was out until Thursday this week; he said he still expected to be able to deliver everything needed by Planning for the SID prior to the 3/28 court date. Friday, March 24th, 2000 DM turned in permit application and plans, accepted at counter for review; Monday, March 27th, 2000 Requested Court set over cases for re-scheduling or dismissal pending compliance. New issues raised: no mech final on 7800/#100 and no inspection/engineer's letter on rock retaining wall. Monday, April 03, 2000 Requested Court dismiss 7800 Durham cases for cos• : ..1 ce: 7800/#100 fmalled and engineer's letter re rock retaining wall rece -•. 7• I • •• .'• _ . •' ' : . .11,. •- clearan - : . ' • - . i . ` • E: This permit is for the already completed fill & . •• g ONLY - it does not contemplate or consider preparation necessary for subsequent construction. V9) D OIUNER: DAVID METZGER AP ICANT: NICOL! ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 215 P.O. BOX 23184 SHERWOOD OR. 91140 TIGARD OR 91284 PHONE: (503) 625-1045 PHONE: (503) 620-2086 GRADES ESTABLISHED BY: U.S.G.S. CITY OF TIGARD ELEVATION DATUM: BRASS DISK N CURB AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF S.W. 16TH AND BOND ST. INDEX NO. 1'13 ELEVATION 14839 XXX NEW GRADES (EXISTING GRADES DUE TO FILL PLACEMENT) EXISTING GRADES (ORIGINAL /GRADES TO FILL PLACEMENT) I.) THE SITE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY FILLED. THIS APPLICATION 15 TO PROVIDE A PERMIT AND DOCUMENT THE EXISTING FILL PLACEMENT. PROJECT: 2.) THE PROPOSED GRADES WILL BE ADJUSTED WHEN THE METZGER EXISTING HOUSE IS REMOVED FROM THE SITE. A FINAL GRADING PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SITE FILL / PLANS FOR THIS SITE. 3 J PROVIDE COMPACTION REPORTS FOR FILL PLACEMENT, GRADING PROVIDE COPY OF REPORTS TO THE CITY OF TIGARD AND NICOLI ENGINEERING. 7910 S.W. DURHAM ROAL TIGARD, OREGON 97223 4.) FILL IS BEING PLACED FOR FUTURE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON THE ADJACENT "JACKSON CLIENT: BUSINESS CENTER" SITE. DAVID METZGER P.O. BOX 275 SHERWOOD, OREGON 97 VICINITY MAP Date: 3-24-00 Scale: 1"=201-0" TAX MAP NO. : 251 13BA Drawn by: JDA TAX LOT NO. : 200 Checked by: PRT ADDRESS: 1910 S.W. DURHAM ROAD Y Job No.: 990904 Drawing No.: P—GRADE al r 61.U.DURHAM RD. r r HIGH Mn UN PIED :7C� I o9 SEWERAGE ! FACILITY Cv CITY OFT 1G ' Re Am Approved Conditionally Approved 4 GRADING PLAN For only the work as described in: [ 1: PERMIT NO -�;� ! � ¢ SHEET See Letter to: Follow.. Attach _ Job Address: d Sc ,� S K 1 By: Date:_ 11/J e 9/19/00 Activities for Case #: SIT2000-00004 U 1:36:59 PM Assigned Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 To Done By Disp. Level By Updated Notes SITC005 Application received 3/24/00 BON RECD No Hold GEO 3/29/00 SITC008 Permit Created 3/29/00 GEO DONE No Hold GEO 3/29/00 SITC013 Plans Routed to Plans Examiner 3/29/00 GEO SENT No Hold GEO 3/29/00 See attached parcel tag for double permit fees. SITC015 Plan Rev. Ltr Sent to Ofc Svcs 3/31/00 3/31/00 SENT No Hold RDP 3/31/00 Sent ltr to Nicoll Engineering- Jim Andrews-620-2086 SITCO26 Plans approved by CPE 5/1/00 5/1/00 No Hold RDP 5/1/00 SITC030 Reviewed plans routed to DSTS 5/1/00 RDP No Hold RDP 5/1/00 SITC710 Fill No Hold RDP 5/1/00 SITC775 Final Report Eng'd Grading No Hold RDP 5/1/00 SITC032 DST Post-Review Completed 5/5/00 GEO DONE No Hold GEO 5/5/00 SITC080 (F)Ready to issue 5/5/00 GEO DONE No Hold GEO 5/5/00 SITC092 (F)Issue permit 5/12/00 DEB DONE No Hold DEB 5/12/00 SITA093 (F)Reprint Permit V / 8/15/00 ZZZ DONE Hold ZZZ 8/15/00 N'CI' ' S1 Ce.,, ,..,_. /,‘":--,1(-. t-T- APT) R`cs-i> 2 J 0 i--) -Deli O APP+`-pet2H sso eD , � h pvofeK— irb dep Co/2_ / A-pp K rc Ze. i 2 r s--)r)z 1-40() E 140 VE- q-h- Page 1 of 1 NiCC } -12750 S.W. Pacific Hwy. �TU � O ��L� �� �� `�n � P.O. Box 23784 n1 i� A ,1 G,1 ENGINEERING Tigard, Oregon 97223 D•TE •Joe NO and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 (1 • OD D4 •TTEN T ION l��tz�N t $o2( TO OIT� of T► vmAt-b RI 33U11-JIN,&, AIO►rib N "To P1,4NNtt-t co, ?APTvte-t-► Tet iOAS • . .t . G s • SITS Vey r Le.?MEN -T t� . 1&rp t C4PrTt o rf- GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings El Prints El Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Gj (o •2L oo g, 24' (of 5tre DEVrct.D Me-tcr ->✓Vi 1 -t)pal McKT`, (o •24.00 a 61,2-x It 1.. ' , 2-b C •27•op 4q 1.hw13 tj A■VP co<Tlo 51.4BNOV, PM,K-A61 e 2X11 1 APIA CAT-in t■i $'ot.M Cb1z16,tOts�4t�� I l MP—s�1 r c '� t�tr t,(aDol 41 it NV E-LO P - ATTltZEcf D 4_ STh1-cP E-t7 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: L� For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted U Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested O Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: , , -__ At - �/ 1 MA'.ICOLI _ P.O5 SW. 23 Pacific Hwy. Ert R) -n n NS n ENGINEERING Tigard, Oregon 97223 OAT( Joe NO `1 ' (0 . 00 994afO4 and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 ATTENTION x - TO l L l 1L � _� , 1 I #"r` \11-414.4-0,e‘ t271.4.411. CiLev■ttA 5b 12. SOOO - COO 1 (o GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached O Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans El Samples ❑ Specifications O Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION i 1 •oo I �...."4.. _ J..... 4 .. ' • 1 9 .5. o0 10 �(��,1 ■ 2 t 15 (o• o•Ov 1 LcvVlPQ c A-c.`P .�.� — 51...Q.e�l I . 2 (2 4 x 3 6) I Co . s yvw,ti e.c4-.t S Le ts.A1A -a.c . 4 wL, T S s it 5C6_AtO etel T `I 9, 5 ci•'Up. OcD I 8�2 l I 51tia__ .2 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval El For your use ❑ Approved as noted D Submit copies for distribution El As requested 0 Returned for corrections El Return _corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: q/w`4d12 1 r:itil All CITY OF TIGARD September 25, 2000 OREGON Jim Andrews Nicoli Engineering 9025 SW Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, OR 97281 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal — SDR2000-00016 To Whom It May Concern: The City has reviewed your submittal material and finds that your application is complete. Staff will now review your application for Site Development Review. A decision will be rendered within 6-8 weeks. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 639-4171, extension 315. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you as soon as possible. Sincerely, 2 Math de g r Assistant Planner i:lcurpin\mathew 1sdr\SDR2000-00016.acc.doc.dot c: SDR2000-00016 Land use file David Metzger PO Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 Proposa i / rr& € \i1WEagAlM! I!!!i.!i,Vii,l origami 1011111 and Construction Services Inc. 9025 S.W. Center Street P.O. Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 620-2086 LAND USE ACTION APPLICATION DOCUMENTS Project: Jackson Business Center Addition 7190, 7800 S.W. Durham Rd. RECEIVED PLANNING Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 27, 2000 JUN 2 8 2000 CITY OF TIGARC Table of Contents • Application Form • Narrative • Impact Study • Affidavit of Posting Notice • Affidavit of Mailing • Neighborhood Notification Letter • Sign in Sheet • Meeting Minutes • Address Labels • Unified Sewerage Service Provider Letter • Title Transfer Instrument • Pre — Application Conference Notes • Reduced Application Drawings SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Ao TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Half Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): "� b e7.t,-1 . tpU 12.1-4 A.M FOR STAFF USE ONLY cm,412_17 Ott Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 'J_S 1 1 BA ' Case No.(s): • 3 0 0, Other Case No.(s): Site Size: -1-1, '-(, 1 s. Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: tray l p M I�TzG, Date: Address: Q, O. ox 2`1'S Phone: City: 5H eladoob Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: /DAV l ID 1�1 TZG1 10_ Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Address: Phone: :ity: Zip: CIT Area: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.1126/98 i:lcurpinlmasterslsdra.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS application. j ' Nje4c.ik bar h ,' ,/ Application Elements Submitted: 0-F 1-k 161-0 PROPOSAL SUMMARY R'" Application Form ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization The owners of record of the subject property request Site ❑ Title Transfer. Instrument or Deed Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): • 6o 4' T�u�T P� ID 32O ' F• At�IT tbN ❑ Site/Plot of copies� (#of copies based on pre-app check list) TO Ate Ext N.61 21, 000 s.F, sr�u�Tu ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/1"x 11") /64-1P 51T 1 M Ptzoy M tT'. [ Applicant's Statement • ��� �ltd t� 1� �P�+�L�T1v � , �v (#of copies based on pre-app check list) ❑ Construction Cost Estimate EK,4NT5 HANe K t.GetAT.Fi r), ❑ USA Sewer Use Information Card (Distributed/completed at application submittal) • y ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped� b FIGS / WA11P HD11�j r '(,AMU _ Legal Size Envelopes (Sfax ❑ Filing Fee (Under$100.000) $ 800.00 ($100,000-$999.999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 I l t skuk Laiae(S —5e4" Cos 1 1 1 I I i • I I 1 I I 1 and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 NARRATIVE Project: Jackson Business Center Addition Address: 7190 and 7800 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR Applicant: David Metzger Prepared by: Nicoli Engineering N.E.I. #: 99-0904 May 4, 2000 The following narrative addresses the applicable approval standards as outlined in the pre-application conference notes prepared by Ms. Karen Fox dated 4-11-00. This narrative should be used in conjunction with the submitted site development review documents. The applicant is proposing a 10,320 square foot addition to the existing 21,000 square foot facility. The two sites will combine and utilize the existing parking, circulation and in some cases the same utilities and facilities. The addition will continue the character, scale and construction type of the existing structure. The proposed building has been designed to accommodate single or multiple tenants. It is anticipated that a similar type and scale of tenant (2,000 - 5,000 square feet) will be leasing the new structure. Both properties, 7190 and 7800, are owned by Mr. Metzger and will operate under a single management entity. The existing common property line will be adjusted and located on the common wall between the existing structure and the addition. This is being done for financial and lending reasons only. The site is being designed and will operate as a single development. Section 18.360 Site Development Review: • The application is being processed as a type II procedure. Section 18.370 Variances and Adjustments: • No variances or adjustments are being requested at this time. Jackson Business Center Narra_,a 6-26-00 Page 2 Section 18.530 Industrial Zoning Districts: • The site is in the I-P zoning district. It is anticipated that future tenant and/or tenants will continue the type of usage found in the existing structure, which are approved for this zone. Section 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation: • The site will be accessed by the modified existing approach from Durham Road. The other existing approach at the northwest corner of the project will be closed and replaced with a new curb and sidewalk to match the existing adjacent system. • The adjacent site (7800) has a 40' access at the northeast corner of the site. It will continue to serve the existing development and will tie into the new circulation system of the new development. Either tax lot can operate with their single access points and fulfill the minimum number of vehicular access and egress requirements for both sites by utilizing both access drives. A "looped" circulation system is created around both sites. • Required Walkway Location: The pedestrian accessway of the existing development will be utilized to provide the required access to the public way (sidewalk along Durham Road). The new development continues the pedestrian circulation system established by the existing facility and provides direct access to all possible entrances. Section 18.725 Environmental Standards: • The tenants have not been determined at this time. It is understood that any future tenants will be required to comply with all applicable standards found in this section. Section 18.745 Landscaping and Screening Standards: • The proposed development provides 23% of the site with landscaping. The applicant is requesting that the landscaping requirement of 25% be reduced to 20%, as allowed in section 18.530.050, B. All requirements of this section have been satisfied. The applicant is also relocating the existing Sequoias along the west and south property lines, which will continue the existing planting strategies from the adjacent site. This is being done at a great expense to the owner in order to save the existing trees and maintain the continuity of landscape boarder plantings. • The proposal will also maintain the use of rock walls and borders to transition from the hard surfaced areas to the planted areas and adjust for grade changes. • The project abuts a residential zone to the west. A 50' setback is required per table 18.530.2. To fulfill the buffering requirements for landscaping and screening requirements option D-2, from table Jackson Business Center Narrai,.c 6-26-00 Page 3 18.745.2, has been utilized. This option provides a 15' buffer with a 6' fence. • Both setback and buffering requirements have been met. Section 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements: • Off-street parking stalls have been provided around the perimeter of the site and building. The existing parking layout of the adjacent site has been maintained and continued with the proposed project. No tenants have been identified at this time, but assumptions have been made in order to estimate the square footage of the anticipated occupancy types, which were used to develop the required parking spaces. This information can be found in the submittal documents, sheet 2.1. • The proposal provides two loading doors, at grade, along the south (rear) elevation. No recessed loading docks are being proposed. • Six bicycle parking spaces are being provided at the southeast corner of the building. This meets the bicycle parking space requirements. Section 18.810 Street and Utilities Improvements: • Streets: The development is proposing to utilize the existing approach, with modifications, to access the site. It appears that additional right of way was dedicated with the improvements of Durham Road. No additional dedications are anticipated. If the modifications to the existing approach are approved, an additional Public Works permit will be required. • Traffic Signal: There is an existing traffic signal at the intersection of 79th, Durham Road and the access to the site. The westbound lane of Durham Road has a turning lane, which will allow a left hand turn into the site. An existing sign at the light allows this left hand turn. The left hand turn does not appear to be controlled by the traffic signal system. Egress from the site to the westbound lane of Durham Road will possibly require modification to the existing traffic signal system. • Sanitary Sewers: The development will connect to an existing 4-inch diameter line stubbed to the site. It appears that no additional Public Works permits are required for this aspect of the project. • Storm Drainage: The storm water drainage patterns are noted on the submitted facility plan. All storm water (building and impervious surfaces) is collected and then gravity flows to an onsite pump station. From this point, water is pumped to a collection basin and then gravity flows to the manufactured water quality facility. This facility "treats" and "detains" the outflow and will gravity flow to the existing 15-inch diameter line in Durham Road. A permit will be required for this work. n-, • Fee In-Lieu of Undergrounding: Jackson Business Center Narrative 6-26-00 Page 4 The applicant will pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding the public utilities. Section 18.790 Tree Removal: There are twelve existing Sequoia trees along the common property line. The owner is proposing to have eleven of these trees commercially relocated along the west and southern property lines. One tree cannot be relocated due to a trunk/root condition. Retention of over 75% of the existing trees over twelve inches in caliper requires no mitigation per code section 18.790.30, 2d. Section 18.795 Visual Clearance: • Visual clearances at the proposed access to Durham Road will be maintained as required. Refer to landscape plan for further information. •••••• ■■■•• •• ••••••• ••••■■■■■ • ■■�■■■■■8■■■ u^!EV= /21•1'■■7 in�■ r i■r1UM1 IWO mamma an 1 TIIIIPPEIPERMIEM en mil mu irll 1101 1p and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 IMPACT STUDY Project: Jackson Business Center Addition Address: 7190 and 7800 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR Applicant: David Metzger Prepared by: Nicoll Engineering N.E.I. #: 99-0904 May 4, 2000 The following information is provided as a vehicle to quantify the effect of the development on the public facilities and services. Refer to the submittal drawings for further information regarding these services. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: The proposed development will utilize one of the two existing approaches from Durham Road. The approach, which aligns with 98th Street, is being proposed as the main entrance to the site. The existing approach is approximately 24- feet wide, constructed as a typical commercial driveway. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the approach by widening it to approximately 40' and constructing the approach to meet the City of Tigard design requirements of a "PRIVATE ROAD ENTRANCE" (City of Tigard detail PRVT-ENT, DWG). The existing traffic light will be utilized for accessing and exiting the site. The existing left turn lane, from the westbound traffic on Durham Road, will be utilized for accessing the site. It is anticipated that the traffic light can be modified for egress from the site onto the westbound lane of Durham Road. The existing approach from Durham Road, at the northwest corner of the site, will be closed. It is understood that an additional permit will be required for the proposed work in the public right of way. The vehicular circulation system from the adjacent site (lot 7800) will be combined with the movement system of the proposed project. This will provide two access points to the development Jackson Business Center Impact,tudy 6-26-00 Page 2 BIKEWAYS: Five bicycle parking spaces have been provided for with this development. This project will not have an impact on the bicycle circulation systems. DRAINAGE SYSTEM: No drainage ways or systems are on this site. The project is within approximately 500-feet of Fanno Creek. The applicant has received approval from Unified Sewage Agency for this site. PARK SYSTEM: This project should not have an adverse impact on the park or recreational systems. WATER SYSTEM: A 2-inch diameter waterline was stubbed to the site from the adjacent development and will be used to supply the new building. No additional connections to the public line are required for this facility. Water usage is unknown at this time, since the buildings use is undetermined. STORM DRAINAGE: There is an existing 15-inch diameter storm drainage line in SW Durham Road. An onsite manufactured water quality facility will be used for the treatment and detention system for the newly created impervious services. This facility will discharge into the 15-inch diameter line. Due to the elevation differences between the site drainage system and the existing 15-inch public storm drainage line, a pump system will be used to facilitate the elevation differences. A street opening permit will be required for the connection of the onsite system to the public line. SANITARY SEWER: A 4-inch sanitary sewer line is stubbed to the site from the public line in Durham Road and will be utilized by this facility. No additional permits will be required. NOISE IMPACT: The building has not been leased at this time, therefore noise sources, if any, cannot be determined. It is understood that whatever or whoever occupies the facilities will meet all noise requirements. Jackson Business Center Impact study 6-26-00 Page 3 CONCLUSION: The impacts placed upon the public systems by the proposed development are consistent with projects of this scale and type. It does not appear that any unique or out of the ordinary requests or impacts are being placed upon any of the existing Public Facilities or Transportation Systems. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, J 11-1 4414tD12- 1A-1 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 8ia,1t_t)IN6) A `7ar,. sI,TE 1,4,o 12.. .-. affecting the lunci located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1190 S.W. bUt2.}4M1 IzDAP , and did on the 2 5 day of Ap_N i— , 'la0 0 1-9----- personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 1. 4$b U ' application, -e e , _= e - - --- e e e •--- -: . : -... - - : --- - - hl401.-1/4E t-kuMasiz-WHt c1101- 4l-- I t%FOta-Kal l 0 ti CAA. t aBTPAK sp o tiz-. es,u The sign was posted at �i'•t�'Aen e- e- ��IDQ V- A ,ap e- 1 tRo 4.I 1. i 4taH-Am 12-0 ,O. (state location you posted notice on property) Si• ature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of li , 1_ _ , U OFFICIAL SEAL l ' _; .. g? ELAINE C HEcR N S , RY PUBLIC OF OREGON ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON t COMMISSION Na My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRE:" '''�' (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) ENAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME:P.�UU,t ilacx ACCAr1b 14 6 tJAC( - 'P( 8li tt4.G55 G ,µf1 ] — I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: $ S1 JLI Di g& 1 li-i Ptz<fni Retvrs I Name of Applicant/Owner: IDAV 11,9 M �,p I Address or General Location of Subject Property: 1 l q p 5•tJ• tx1 t?klAl''1 1z-l., Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 'L l 1 3 'A 300 h:Uogin\patty masterslatpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, 31M A ■ bV- tNe , being duly sworn, depose and say that on AI 1L 1,5 , z000 , 4-9— , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 1190 5.41. oU12.HAM tavab 1 Tl r rte . a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at -ri G►A h b ,c7 OS-Cm O N , with postage prepaid thereon. ` 1 Z��i A . t / 1 1 Ail 61 A ELAA./L_ �S•ignature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 4_day of 1i° Z OFFICIAL SEAL (__.,' fil' I IL' ,� ELAINE c SEAL NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON \;- •�I NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON My Commission Expires: COMMISSION NO.21C,1 S MY COMMISSION EXPIRE'', 4E" i,S 2002 (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 'NAME OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NAME: V.1,1(.b(1�61 A.t11T10I4 G JAGKE✓ON4 �.{rdl, 1'c� Gn 1t �. I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: t'tit1 LIDI N.en it SITE 1 M Pt2W M EN.TS Name of Applicant/Owner: bAV I t) M�f?�E . I Address or General Location of Subject Property: 71`i o S.%d. DU le-l-FAtI VI, I Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): 25 l 1 3 13:A 3 DD L. h:Vog inlpatty1masterslafmail.mst • a= lir /NW -17-kV I ENGINE EltIN/ and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 April 24, 2000 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 Job # 99-0904 To Whom It May Concern: RE: 7910 and 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR Tax Map #2S113BA Tax Lot #200 & #300 Dear Interested Party: Nicoli Engineering is representing David Metzger, the owner of the property located at 7910 and 7800 SW Durham Road (see attached vicinity map). The owner is proposing to construct a 10,000 square foot addition to the existing structure. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on Tuesday May 9, 2000 at the office of Nicoli Engineering, located at 9025 SW Center Street, Tigard, Oregon at 6:30 p.m. • Please realize this will be an informational meeting to discuss preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 620-2086 if you have any questions. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA/cjb Enclosures PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS MAP! � - �/ — :L_ AIL --- - -- - ------ ------—�—�- >��� CITY of TIGARD ILN - •' GEOGRAPHIC Ier ORmAf1OM "'WA• • P.M R: Ei T... 1 .4 L4 t:II ,',N4+4,0" lfri 'k1+ _ SKI}DO' 4 30t2l 600 AREA NOTIFIED • sn coo`aoo t 1st coo h , It c0 • t pol lot it' f2 coossoo �s�,i co �c soo Q m:-Q o .'2511 C 0090R� _ __ > (500') 211 l'. '`',..',..cco eaa I' —1 ( I t,• q Q — f--C_�— 2st c0o4e0o 2011 6004500 2671 coo 100 2511 C00 100„tsn2oo0 500 : 2ceo eoo }I}} } I r�,,,�! m coo 000 2S112coog000 2�1/2200Mp0 1" 251 coo 000'{2$t 000 200 r r = I tslitco0 70o Illllll �,y'i, 2211 COO 29o¢tsn coy,coo Lisotl.F00000., I- tO 1St17C001300 9*a W t + w Ji t + _.___ • r ;1,1,71..:4,x' M^h '!T 1 h�I'I Y'i l� i ...110:',7c.;,.. 'f x r l,,, ''.A0,4.1'4' ,;h,a roil; �'p ,° l!.M„ R;. Ioiuccci000 25117cCO20oo '� '' '' 9,,y 1 h , 4 �,,, 1 For Jim Andrews, Nicoll En r 2S112c0o1200� f' 4.. 1� r :.wA�'s1 ,w- g. r y 2sn2coonoa • w } tantcoo o ' " Re: 7910 SW Durham ' • (2S 1 13 BA, 003 00) DURHAM RD — —_ _• _...,. _ SUBJECT AX LOT1�— _ -Il Y r _i P/.ham eke t • 1 ', w t. a 11`' r:'` 151178a00100 . ✓. .•y, rr E1 sR' ,‘IX 4 ,:t t 0y1 ,�. _ (n P X 2S1033000300, - w , n R ‹.� l,µ. ,< O �T 1 e ,,,..:.1,.-,;:,,,,,,,,,, () r. • s 1" IS11]9a00000 - �/ 0 100 200 300 400 feel t-•287 feel ....4;.a i 414011, I u , , --- -____________ City of Tigard �,. . Information on this map is for general location only and 1 should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Mall Blvd L Tigard.OR 97223 .------ -_... (503)639-4171 --__..__._�._._.. _ —_.. - _._._...._.—_____—.—__._ __. _.. _____— ��._ httplAwmccs.lipaM.er.ua i 1 Community Development Plot date:Apr 18,2000:C:Imagic\MAGIC03.APR NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. JlM /6,N1,4‘-) 1\u.a,u µ61iis► -- (Zo- 208& ' o 2S 5.w. i- ?_ Ttc,'4- -2 o - '11 1.2.• f . _•__._.____■ 11uui�0�^nil .\ 1._7_. ns-i • i.��■ it i■■r _ 1 EN I I 101111WOVAI 11.1 I Are el 1101MI iwt� and Construction Services, Inc. 9025 Southwest Center Street P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)620-2086•FAX (503) 684-3636 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES May 9, 2000 @ 6:30 p.m. Attendees: Dave Metzger (Property Owner) Jim Andrews (Nicoli Engineering) Items Discussed: 1. Weather 2. Fishing 3. State of the Universe • 2S 112CD-04300 2S 112CD-02400 BATES CHRIS&• FLECKER ROBERT H STOLTZ SHANNON 16707 GRAEF CIR 7870 SW BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-04200 2S 112CD-03800 BENGE STANLEY C&MARLYS S GIRTMAN OPAL B TR 7850 SW BOND ST 22 GRAVATT DR TIGARD,OR 97223 BERKLEY,CA 94705 2S 112CD-04000 2S112CD-05300 BERG&OLDHAM INVESTMENTS LLC GOLDBERG LAURA D 4035 DOUGLAS WAY 7963 BOND ST LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-01300 25 112CD-05600 BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M GONZALES BARBARA LEE/CARLOS 10525 SW TIGARD ST 7915 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-02100 251138A-00400 CARLO JAMES J& HAMBACH MICHAEL V& CALLAHAN MERRY A SATTLER SANDRA E& 7895 SW BOND ST BROWN LORENE TIGARD,OR 97224 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 2S112CD-04900 2S 112CD-01000 CARR ANNE M HAMBACH MILDRED 7980 SW BOND ST 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112C D-04500 2S 112CD-04700 COUTURE ROBERT E&TRISH S HEIDER RICHARD R AND PO BOX 3273 LAURELEI M ARLINGTON,WA 98223 7948 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S 112CD-02500 2S112CD-02200 DANAHY L SUSAN HIERSCHE R DAVID 7785 SW BOND STREET 7885 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 25 112CC-04800 2S112CD-01200 DUSKIN GREG A&CAROL A HOFFART HERBERT J 7998 SW BOND 4632 SW VERMONT ST TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S112CD-05500 2CC-01900 ELISARA TOGAMAU T& HOFF'• • - 'T J ELISAA TRACY C 4632 ER :•T ST 7931 SW BOND ST ..RTLAND,OR 972 TIGARD,OR 97224 . • ..-I 2S112CC-02000 1136A-00500 HO T BERT J PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 4632 ONT ST do TIGARD-TUALATIN SCHOOL RTLAND,OR 97219 DISTRICT#23J 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-02300 2S1 12C D-03900 HOFFMAN JUDITH A QUINN ROBERT D 7865 SW BOND ST 2105 PEREGINE TIGARD,OR 97224 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S 112CC-04900 2S 112CD-04800 JOHNSON BRADLEY A/PAULA C RACANELLI ROCKY AND DENISE 8000 SW BOND 7964 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1138A-00100 2S112CD-05201 JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST THE RAY MICHAEL D/DIANA L BY CARL H JOHNSON TR 7979 SW BOND ST 8965 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 112CD-03700 2S 112CD-02600 KOOPMAN DEVIN P SANDLIN SHEREE DIANE 7720 SW BOND ST 7765 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 112CD-05000 2S 112CD-04400 LAMOTT GENE P&CHANZE H SCHNEPF ROBERT W/MIRIAM A 3467 CASCADE TER 15880 SW 79TH WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S112CD-03600 2S112CD-01100 LEBEDA VLASTIMIUSHARON SCHOEWE DALE D 15607 SW HIGH PIONT DR 7925 SW DURHAM ROAD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S113BA-00300 2511380-00300 METZGER DAVID SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 7910 SW DURHAM RD 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97123 2S 113BA-00200 2S 112CD-04100 METZGER DAVID G/DIANNE S SIMONS GLEN H PO BOX 400 HEALY JEAN M SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PO BOX 5996 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S 112CD-05400 25112CD-04600 ONTHANK SONJA R SMITH JOHN WILLIAM 7947 SW BOND ST 7932 SW BOND ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S113BA-00401 TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S113BA-00600 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY 150 N FIRST HILLSBORO,OR 97123 2S112CD-03500 WAGNER ERNST J 7680 SW BOND TIGARD,OR 97224 • Sally Christensen Bill Finch 1 5685 SW 76' Avenue 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Mary in Melvin CITY OF TIGARD 10395 SW Bonanza Way SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97224 Stephen Bicker 14235 SW 97v Avenue iacurpinlsetupllabelsiCIT South.doc UPDATED' 12-Apr-00 Tigard,OR 97214 C/7 i ' Mark Bogert i 1/0 14445 SW 100'Avenue Cotg5//64641 � • � Tigard, OR 97224 l Twyla Brady Post-if fax Note 7671 acre ' 9360 SW Edgewood Street 1 M WANE Tigard, OR 97223 AY-M WENN!'I IIgIi/ ' i ►w1j Debra Muir Wil' ' WSI�' 15065 SW 79s Avenue Tigard, OR 91224 Sue 5iebold 1 5374 SW Thurston Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav PO Box 230695 Tigard, OR 97281 Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109'Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 f Uji • UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY March 20, 2000 David Metzger . PO Box 400 Sherwood, OR 97140 Re: 2S113BA-00300 Office Building The Agency has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Agency staff has conducted a pre-screen review, and concluded that no . sensitive areas exist on or adjacent to this site. In light of this result, no further action is required at this time. This document will serve as your Service Provider • letter as required by Agency Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1, and your Stormwater connection authorization as required by Agency Ordinance 27, Section 4.b. • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (503) 846-3795. Sincerely, • jAct*c(Ak. aiL0....-_ S. Alison Rhea - Site Assessment Coordinator e:Admin/DC Standards/ESA Reply Letters/251138A 300/msgs 155 North First Avenue.Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/648-6621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:5031640-3525 06227200 04:55 X 503 625 5310 D MotzVor Const. P.01 x110 3.rtz INSVRANCe It W? .1 At4TY DEI.D or hi a :rye`BTATC or ocCOON t •untyelWe�t+tnyla0 r 68 W ORANTOR; 1)18 DURICItF FAMILY TRUST deny l f RI Meyes- ORAKfEE: DAVIt)METZ,GER *so I",d R Count a� !howl LIA •.{ .s i.sA °Oise) Until 1 shines Lai kQtlent:4,CI ten etuemcnu shalt be county ,D)11 ~� teat U nu renowins ocki ew f• iii DAVID METZOER �� _}fie ?? 7910 6W DURHAM RUAD 1 TIGARD.QRE00H 97214 • Q� Mletor el escrow No.414070 Tine No 611070-TM aa11oM1 Doc ; 991396 After.leecutieg mum to: Rect.; 222014 286.00 DAVID A46T2Ork 12/10/1091 10:27110 a:, 7910,SW DURHAM ROAD TIGARD,OREOON 97221 Re-rt:corc10€1 to uurrect the speJ l i nn 01 the 9rantc•r•a name, j a' ) ovT�u�r rH Ct7rtcr as tluc;ult. r)� � 0 ft1 34;°.4. _- er. STA7'111'UItl'lt'AJtRAfil'1'DY..0 a• RAI.Pf{D.INALKEK Arm MARY It.DUAKI:I:,Co-TRUSTEES AM1ra AM ,)tWsrcI!5 W1i0 Aki.St;:C ESSO1t:5 • T11ERF70.UIDJT AAl la OCTOBER 27,1991,FJD/0 Tilt DURK1:1;FAhill,V'TRUST.Umr k.�,conva c Ic4 W/rtentc u■ AAVIIMItiIil(I Ciearacc,the(011Dwing dcuribcd real horny fire rr e.nsaimbnnenexc.epc RN Spec/1 a11y e t foul.heron i rikxisd h WASHINGTON County.Chelan,to wit:4'PIT:')'1',ti1•): j • CC SEE''i.rCAL VLSCRIPTICIre AT TACIIED IIER?:T()AND AY ILrl :14ENL MA1,F.A PANS }IiNFIC ', 11118/NSTRIJMtNT Wl4i.NOT ALLOW USE Or 111(NYC/KATY 1a1S RlltrO IN 1111x fNSTRUML.Nt iN V101 A'f10N i OP APPLICABLE LAND Usti LAWS AND RLGULATitiNt. USEFUIt!:SlUNtt(i oR ACU.PIINo Tills It;s1RUMLNT, TILE PERSON ACQUIItiNO PLD 1 f'LE TO THE PP.OPLIITY SHOtt1.I C:HLCK WITII THE AYYRGPAIA F.Cr1Y OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPART/ NC TO VERt(Y APPROVEU USER AND TO I)ltTr:MMINC ANY LIM! R 014 I LAWSUITS AOMNI'T FARMING 09.FORVR.7 PRACTICE;;AS DEPI$I I)iN OICS 20.9X0. The.said inove ty is(ire from i csctmbn rats sacopt STATUTORY POWFR.S.;t1CLt1:)NO 11111}e)V,9dc Of A`+ttSStlllrr of TILL UN!'LED SEWhY..AGfi AGENCY Ok WASHINCTON COUNTY I.Axen(ChTs.As 1(1.c:takfaF.tl. The tent,confidential kg this coeveyerce lx;190,C00.90 (Herc r.rv,,p17 with the rcq„hcro,•n+s nl 011S 93.04) 1 Uded ibis 0, dey of,,�Q[ _At�t]t' 'r 19 9.. Tim: EAJRKF.F. F' I LY iT' .esegio , �IfTI r 4-ghl 11AItl1Ne)iN/ CGVKTY /yllj_Rt M1MiRfa. rR,rNtrex /AX 1{L .,�. �e� .i� . �_s 1Z 1la a P4 i na PAC DATE Orcio �The fogoJ11ul Waif/c>vow1e11n1 ns this dq ed yfc0f4.(0.�I ,L92 .1)y 1LALP1l D.MAKER,TAUSTCI's end MARY H."NWT..TRUYTFI of 1NL.DUIRKEE PAMILY TRUST eorporstion,w+ billeted the cupavntion. i ' ( I��{ .: orrtouwtwu. Nolo a UL;for Grelen -'�.. ��C T+ ►AY M oroestf1tlon expire, C0t idfl Y , �� �1RtJ0. .11 . 1 T K 5 { 4 / F T \ < �� � ,� & a y �; a:� > lox ® n § 44 „4° , ^o-i .aa, ,. >�a .� fi 4 T��" �rva. .?;,`re ? : a?; @ '..z�,.,.taia' x "� s$ , rz? ;Rt . ,.._� .. ... • Pie-App ica ion eet ng.o es" re �a 1.!.01-1X, 6 onths ,, R: - W -4•' f NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: t-/1r I I(/�IOU STAFF AT PRE-APP.: Rr ,61 2 APPLICANT: INtco i Ev\C.(neer inn 46) UwvU-PA :pccuid AGENT: JAW A✓�d�tA w�� Phone: (006) (paD-dO$CD M Z3er� Phone: (;503) CO20 - 08� PROPERTY LOCATION: • ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: i1 ' OP- ct-12.2., TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): a c I i3A T. . a-nv C-.tict Sot, NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S` /"t >✓ +QPue-t o pr -t_ + RQ O„t ur (140-30 t`tud t V C!/l1 a"A... .e., -kb sccQ.e Lk. -Type.at 4> Ad --Dr PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: lb g Ctc)lct 1fi -- -t o exi of.C,Le_ ILoct tt lnvv«e_✓ MavW4ac,-f,tI 5 191,1.0 dtv,5 691,000s.-F . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: t a I - 2' A/5 aoz,,tr,•cc -p ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: k- P C.I.T. AREA: FACILITATOR PHONE: (503). • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS i,'f,,,i,,,,, MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. t� lot width: '50 ft. Maximum building height: `AS ft. Setbacks: Front 3-D ft. SidebSD ft. Rear c)(d(5 }t. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM.SITE COVERAGE: 1-5- 1 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: as %. [Refer to Code Section 18. /25$r) ] � ree,i c i_' k to& .ion, z) `td t,t,u3-1" ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 5b s If) west rrt�u MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 11011-leidatul ppriatioe/Plu ing OffWO,Section SPECIAL SETBACKS > STREETS: feet from the centerline of • D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half(%) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.BJ I,UQ�-. In rri cue,: /I boo 54t• vv g bvv vku,si nu PARKING AND ACCESS r;" Lk(3k,f- c u�dr;ct i,Co[Ibuv rnih - ho rvt& REQUIRED parking for this type of use: (,)-1-4l a:-7 'coo s - 3.'4600 bOo r taxlrvu Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): toi � �o —ithctQ --�n �,48CO - �Id b■Ag i4 e uK 3.5c /I 7 `e . GJ( of-cf1.0 d SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: wAiti . 44i L Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): o�!� //lib � a.ca44//,f 3�2,J4 .h-9 pck /...5 /o f wirA /D/-/Td patkds spa-c� - '�Shswl� NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED,J AS COMPACT SPACES. '" Lecai PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: nur�� h t; > Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. vt2tr 41/;3 D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. ..— u//, ' Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that U4- ' rN'2 separates the parking space from an adjoining space. 5; ex'G st cc.✓v-x.J Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wh �p or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as 5 landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 Amf 54'l -udce at/ Handicapped Parkin /✓���yc� ./boa / h ( ?9," /� 9 -� /��rPa.cao pp g: 5 = c/.accs > All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED . AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. 4 — 5"O t u31 062, w/ 'AD cubs l t � Minimum number of accesses: or a – 30 u"'�''`1Mini ium access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.165 and 18.7051 App<< 15 (rl0604140 I art-t,Sd bbd.. N4fl_• ,,pp„ '4 , 5.-C/47 2c�c �, a ,Q d / 4fie/CZ. 5,"Lr c� ,49f"`"• CITY Of i1GARD Pre-Appliation Con erena Notes /nom d ,- .q ex/s74/r7.5 h�1 r4:(/riG € Qc-10.6er Page 2 of 9 NOIIJnidnial AppkaurRlyrwr Division Satin J J WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. . I oath" S/Ja c,e4 (mIni.i-,, ) aute re -�� 1/d n s (Refer to Code Section 18.165.0801 h`�� �o. ()h ,4, S 1 `` «� I r / 3/,!8f Ov s� -7� vv�./ ,u p. �owc� S CLEAR VISION AREA -Spece— to The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. XFa...,cCtua 0 (ef-At1w& ek)feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: . LANDSCAPING STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.165 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 11011-Aaidabil Appfiaoa/Phrimg Divoa,knia SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18280) SENSITfifE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHIC. '- OTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DE\ELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN - 100-Y 'R FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRA NAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON S !'ES IN EXCES' OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to • eliminary identify sen•'tive lands areas at the pre- applican conference based on available i r ormation. HOWEVER, t' e res.•nsibilit t. .r-cisel identify sensitive land areas. and their be ndaries. is the rrsponsibili•_ of the applicant. Areas meeting th definitions of sensitive lane must be clearly indicated on clans submitted with the developmen pplication. Chapter 18.84 o provides re•ul. 'ons for the use, protection, or modifi . .'on of sensitive lands areas. RESIDEN L DEVEL ' ENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAI (Referto Code Cha .n5) STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water qu tity functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria. The VEGETATE' CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF -FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined boo daries of the sensitive area, except ere approval has been granted by the Agency or City to redu - the width of a portion of the co nndor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the wid of a portion of the vegetated'corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an are of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroach •-nt shall be 15 fe-t, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of • - vegetated .rridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In an case, t - average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, constr tion .ctivities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any ki e, or othe -ctivities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection pro ided by the vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: > A GRAVEL WALKWAY O' :IKE PATH, NOT E' . EEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated c• ridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gray: walkway or bike path may no •e constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of e sensitive area, unless approved • the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be •nstructed so as to minimize disturbance • existing vegetation; and > WATER QUALI FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated •rridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the ap• oval of the Agency or City. Location ofVe•et. es •rri•er: IN ANY RESID. TIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARC ZS.or lots intended for separate 0 nership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWM) 011 OF TIGARD Pre-Applintion Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-laidnual llppfinbo,/Pt Mmg p reios S,mas , WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER SOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive an and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wet ds, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear an . objective standards to: protect significant wetlands .nd streams; limit development in designs d riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water q : ity; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve ative plant cover; minimize streambank erosion• aintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; :nd conserve scenic, recreational and edu•ational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor; The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT AL'‘• MEETS THE REQUIREME■• S OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of e Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions -quire that "significan " wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin R er, which is also . "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARIN T' AMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 c...ic feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FAN C' .EK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CR 'KS) AND :ALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARIN STREAMS" accords•. to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard includ- Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tri•utaries of the Tualatin Rive . Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HO: ZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-B KS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIAT' s WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor bou•dary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TU" "TIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, .less modified in accordance with is chapter. ➢ The MAJOR REAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in -ccordance with this cha• er. ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian -tback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agenc (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. [Refer to Code Section 18.791.030] Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY . 'PROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC ' DUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM - PARIAN SETBACK BY MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious su :ces otherwise prohib' ed by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major earn resources • ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetatio • preserve. portions of the riparian setback area. Eli.ibilit fir Riparian Seta kin Di t rb-. A -a TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SET:' K REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially d' turf:d at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the egetati.• Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: • Native plant species currently ' .ver less than 80% • the on-site riparian corridor area; • The tree canopy currently avers less than 50% of th- in-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been remov-d from the on-site riparian setb. area for the last five years; A That vegetation was no emoved contrary to the provisions o ection 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plan pecies; Cm OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 MOM-Aeideotul Apphaow/Hyrng Diruioo Setts ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. (Refer to Code Section 18.791.1001 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing tre 55,,a�cluding trees designated as significant by the City; cth c.) lcee' t ocock ea L >0 ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.06011 an OF T1GARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 QOM ksike� AppficatsaMaiitg Dioiva kcua . NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(fired Triangle Design Standards) "/1 8.765(OH-Street Parking/loading Requirements) 18.340(Directors Interpreution) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive lands Review) / 18.350(Planned Development) -✓ 18.705(Accest/Egress/Cxadaaion) 18.780(Signs) Jl 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.110(Accessory Residential 18.185(Tenponry Use Permits) \/ 18.370(Yarianar/Adan usenn) 18.115(Density Computations) / 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Hap/Text Amendments) J 18.120(Design Conpatibilty Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance keas)/ 18.385(Misallaneous Permts) 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WA)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Halting Procedures/impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) V 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 1 8.420(land Partitions) / (Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) 1 8.745(landsaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Nan ufactired/Hobil Home Regulations) / 1 8.520(commercial Zoning Districts) _ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) .. 1 8.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconlormiug Situations) IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF . ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUB t ISION LAN USE APPLICATION with - - of Tigard, appli :Tits are required to complet and file a subdi ' ion plat naming reque with the 1: hington County Surveyors Office in or r to obtain appro .I/reservation for .-y subdivision n.me. Applicati• s will not be accept d as complete until the City receives e faxed confirmation of approval fro•4 the County of t Subdivision Name Reserva •• [County rveyor's-O ce: 503-648-88841 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 11011-ksikslial Appicaties/Flamag Dirnio.Section BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 182551 �tv? ahfa"mt " / ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: `m �' a G eft' r /fr 1a ca p i whack ono- wkcei- f na r f ' % 1a%ci6erfei ^- hac1�- T4- reAAAxA-E a0-10 rsf SO-f + 7 t k- a-v, 1-aL -fib r-r-t f ed coo -I a-pp l,'ca_4(,,,:. art c4-e ,,._ ,10`)„ re m 7.Q.� Q MT-LIT wt reraju d - Le-, S kc A bee 'Iz&e.-yv�f1 �u -1 v 12-LvItA ue_ -kce e 1 oc caect cd2f,1 � Sv t t�.r� .n �Yl.f�(�l`� to Q (P_�'l L SI cte OF I i v'- J kvyk c vwl e-i d.od i �ec u (� c 1.1,. Do' Q- 3 Do (1404,4 (; ere,kkl- 7lD ��p�G/ D e ( U JIJ J 0-5 1,/- -o"- ,-,Tl eLG(-- /1 US PROCEDURE (it)a_ k <- , ) c feT, 1/,7 e � a� M /n5 6Jc 'ems > Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Ma•s submi ed with .n a• •lication shall be fold-d IN ADVANCE to 8. b 11 in h-s. One 1 :12" 11" M. • of . •ro•osed •ro'ec hould be ubmit ed for attach en • h- staff re so or . • ini r. ive • - i ••n As •lica i•n with of•Id-d mass hall no b- . • • ed MT OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-NeidacII Approtiw/Myriag DW11100 Secs • The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). • • PREPARED BY: `f //- 60 Cl 0 IGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-7291 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us N:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commerdal.doc (Engineering section preapp.eng) Updated 28-Feb-2000 OTT OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 MOM-Anitlawl Appfintios/ryvriq pui�Sector .1 PEPLI:CATJONCONFEREI�9CNOTES^ «y, . :. ➢��'�ENG1NEERING<SEC T1ONft¢y¢. .j(��' '¢ ��►"; / go° �.,a ..,,.. .> t. ;` .i i�w'SFt...aliFnA ,�Better1Gommunity • zS ( A PUBLIC FACILITIES The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for. nn 0 I AD. to gyp' ZS feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. st. PL NvbT qvu L�cv Tia l t -AN1 teU DE N . f I� Afj01T�v-1/�_ W 1S � Street improvements: (t.) _� 'CIS street improvements will be necessary along Svu D A*"' Zp to include: feet of pavement n concrete curb [1 storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk L4treet trees H street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF MAN Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Ei�luMaS Is[iutantSuctte. ( ) _ stre nprovements will be necessary alc _ to include: ❑ feet of pavement [] concrete-curb I storm sewers and other underground utilities (� -foot concrete sidewalk I I street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approva may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreemeni which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvemeni district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) (Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF flung Pre-Appfcatlon Conference Motes Page 2 of 6 E gloeetlogDepartmentSodium are on the opposit€ le of the street from the site. If th e in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. C1 T ere are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW VGA'"' . Prior to 'Fi►. , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitaD, sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located 1f-1 SVJ 04-4- ■ V.-c . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to +t.r c &n.-a •447 ADrr •.J Water Supply: (Mtn The G - Phone:(503) ( `(-4'1 I provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gefte-Birchilt, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties.when fully developed. • °NStTE R.(3). Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75)which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF IMAM) Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Eiehnrt•i Ispartmnt Satin newly created impervious faces. The resolution contains a F 'sion that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City wil use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project wil require: ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. i • SIC,N� p D�,4�M --( 4'-- 4.A6r ge, tA.,,Dlf d) �„ �„cR-a__ --c--frt,s Dr._Ad . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projectec impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upor the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation o the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limitec circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater thar $5,000.00. [4j --i • 1 PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineerinc Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections tc main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permitteE must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type o permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of E EIIIu ert.iIsparts.itSsctl.. . In addition, the pe. tee will be required to post a boi )r similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OFTIGARD Pre-Appllcatlon Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Eraol000rtrri oapartmoot Soctloo GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FL UBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. ThE engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, a5 well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shal include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shal also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: -►_t1eP 4 1( zoo 'T INEERING Dr PARTMENT S AFF Phone: [5031639-4171 Fax: [5031 684-7291 h:\pattylrnasters\prea pp.eng (Master section:preapp{.mst) 04-March-1999 • CITY OFfl6ARD Pre-Appgcatian Conference Motes Page 6 it 6 c,ut■..nn hurtmootSscUs. • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: `KaLt,c„A cox; Date: (-II I l IOC) 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL AE / � REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: 'AL',�4 G f 1/h'5 vL 4, J Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization-ems ° - c'Qt/` Title transfer instrument or grant deed - 1 P6pj Ibf J`"," Written summary of proposal - 6O cop1e' Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) - AD cop/e€. Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes and a notarized mailing list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see attached envelope submittal requirements) /Uo rkefe-ud mai/ - fhlact•j&x_., Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) - ac-evicS Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes - / Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map �' Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Z Existing Conditions Map Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map in�'e41 j / ' Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan'evx_od/cfia. Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan -12K Site Development Plan -fz• Architectural Drawings O Landscape Plan / " ' ❑ Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED — cR v et.9,ieS The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES .e) COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study A-L"f I -t-`'t c ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an • architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 8Y2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). tru all , exccpt rf nc! 6)60/"6t s/e te_ u.)/7 • Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The roposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicini map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, ddresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer, en•• eer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, no arrow and date ❑ Boundary lin of tract to be subdivided Names of adjac •t subdivisions or names of recorded owners o adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines relat-• to a City-established benchmark at 2' i -rvals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 1 a°o ❑ The purpose, location, ty•- and size of all of the followi • (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-w. s and easeme ❑ • Public and private sanitary and s •rm sew- lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire d .nts ❑ • Major power telephone transmission ' e 50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, op: spaces, path - s and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with . •iameter 6 inches or • -ater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structure: and the present uses of the uctures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platti • ❑ Supplemental information i cluding: • Proposed deed rest( tions(if any) ❑ • A proposed plan f• provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural feat es including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh area The proposed lot •nfigurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where •ts are to be used for purposes other an residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the fa -going information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrate e and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan —5kvyv exis*t►AS -Vt- p'to-6)0??td (b+ cc, -rf� � lta__Q lo1- The owner of the subject parcel C� � 5 {i� t�, ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date — if 1-bk L'.LA-C A u',�+ w�-b ❑ Proposed property lines V16 oh{ C'( ,: i- f- ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries pick-44 u-ge ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5' for slopes >10%) re ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent djacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% Cl Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations,dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25'of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials El Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas,and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist • Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i:l;curpl n\masterslrevised\chkl ist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 N UNION J=i 979.,9:11 J9.'.'9n.. .,4 ConeDve11e..9..len Inc L J L. .-j-r_ L L J ms9rr91.1•rarwl !i ; v v v v v LT � v v v sp19.9.nm Ph= 13111 CUM DA PN lei-313, rckaa aJJ � J JJ 1IJSJSJ� Er aric o (proeg 1m ABBREVIATIONS BUILDING INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Y. K,L4Marl �. 1. ...(0000.. ..,EMI ..ter... Med.FIORIATION ALT. AL/P.0ft :a SITE,... ., COW..... "11 w.w..41..0E 010141 a.., .,...r. OMTB,_,VIL AISZ ,. .rrt M.MYTta, MO.., .,,. MM. (.1.1.1.4.+... nr..ra,e.,. WIT E• MO sox.ter ad CA. HESS.l.eeim M.q aea...c.. .errs•,r .reo.oco oIf ISM TOR NOT TO Soli r *wows u r.urt QM. OMIT CFR ee. M04 00+00... .w mnrc+.a.e.a wo�a.. v ..anw e+r1 roL ...17 ,raw PLASM wa SITE INFORMATION neo. w CLA �^ 00�......,. DEFERRED PERMITS ,. uvAra1 COL. C.03,14+. � 1R:,n,. ...n .ea... .......o. '"°'° ., ..,aw ESE,,...,. PIOECk r .a...o BULDNO(.e.r0.» .r...m.E. .c,E ,.a..K PM OVAL MM.& PRIMMTRATOR (..e .( .r15...... ...n....0 04 ADDITION DESIGN CRITERIA �` `14^'"�-- J SS MR GM.. RAWL RIT041•17,.,(.. ..<. .r.001 e.".^°` !ARK.,. : VICINITY MAP CENTER ROL MAJOR MEMO. WOO ID,.E S M..,.m. 011,//.., .er,,.w, 7100,7000 S.W.DURHAM RD. ILA 00,1/4401 JOOR K. aq.c.coma r.(we..0 r.c+o..u N.A. �w MARC),00 97223 naa.rn ...,.e me. . ARMY, w. ,r.r.,u., DM ... i.w FAG MR.tea r....r ea ..a:V:!"" ... ..1'.. .` + DAVID AETLC36i II, .....019(.n.r %. :n.C.. i Dale 0-21-00 OK welet ..C90.R. A ..rut rtn1.s 1 Drew.9F D1 . �MUM..1..A,o MC .r anwr,�. Sege • .r.. 1R. M.. 111. .41 1...1 ....0.R04..olp ' Ow?M.� A9 .1 ill Mu NM 11Q .n19...L 171,1.071.00/1104,U am ...9 91NR.. WIG NTR.YLL COMA. // On.ng 110J 9401111 01. ANN 02. G000 OF PLANNING APPROVAL SUBMITTAL covul NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEr ET 0.1 • R. `�iO NOME ) t I J1 fi.1.••I:IIJ1:014: / '\ M t,c .Me..C.. f Inc • ,N 105 It WIN fld••I.Y ON ra M106-311 SW.• SOAD '— " nam•�Yn 1 • 49141 FO64M11.=MErrAi ri 1 . we•ruT R • m,. T; 7 R •• i.o.= MOOT L ., Feu IR • : . gill"."'"1 ill11.6191W —A.— / --. ÷---' :"'.41(41"' Olt —6.6— 411111111211i1 b UM ROC.PLAN frit 1---.,..1!»_— - - .. G p gm .n so. • NI nieavaIIGNAM2 s+Aa.L11 4Nlaa7RiSal1 11\nIIIINIIIftMMEN=11■ I TM WT.MOM FON 410 __ 1' - !itli:trtttp .t.. ir 1 ...-6. maw.,"or•111 e••INFLICATIOt .._.. .._• .. .. .. �® I J %,, i— ”I x lI • I •ii I. rloca ITO•VNTY LW .,.... .�... I•al. BULLING ACOMON ... R A• .a...°I JApCBON•• `' $ CBfTffi V--ON..•�•.•c .i•, )1 W.]!00 SM.Ol1RNAY R0. ....�...» 6•„ II. • �I S ncAno.a fnzs S, i LA nr� K ia. LiFR `a1iml�0 a ��Urur Ur aak„= ASS 1�ir,... .... i\i .... ...,„... MI ii q DAV�IFrzcaw. ITE,LMT0r L. f Scd. 1•-M m ��•Moe Orson by 01 im 0.66.1 by .1114 +rat•1;r111.7.1.,� .. ..R.• t .! -a . W! • J.III N0104 .••.• : • :j •. 0'•"11111 I-1w LOAM 7 •I. GS .. r a. ,. ,. ••w+m. F((F * LI$ITI••rw ro,•ou.w r, .ITE INFORMATION I TO •••••.—.v.I•.. ..., ”" . NO POOMMO ••Tw••rob,•»•-- 6ir.u.�"' r —»••• ••• PROPOSED EX 1ST ING S�PLAN SITE RAN o.. .N.,..., YM SHEET 1 .1 • • • TREE SCHEDULE I ... .1.1.71. 001.0-0 .a .•w. \►E'i @_]!E:l. Ws.. ••• . •• •0110 — — — ..e.,.•.en. 11...... + Re it t..fal•PA 1.IPM Y17 -- P1 _—_� K M 91P7 't R.. py 01-1111 • •34,.... r•a,."°°�'.a....• `" AA Homo SW.D(WHAN ROAD Fe Pq 191-u • • .S.CR.ZGi°�== :'�i -/ ............. . 0 •• ." . 010 'ij 1 X- ..4.• MLA.•••001.• •.:.... r ` � . r' ` / ms OAR .co«• .NOT.. to .1M v.. LL �° _ —. 1 ® •....•.1146... �j.. ti i -C a.w�..:...,.�.c.. u.A X Roma.• v. "46011 •x' -- f_'— \!'i' ' .a r.ry PP_•� ■ 1 / • /•LP.MCA Jr ACM N(r.eO�i�.nS•4 R26 r• 1L...•U.A t1M0,1 '_ -M .gyp@ • 0 46.,1.1 ...mac.••AA ,c �t:� R.O.ry .P3inell y ▪ "°"' �.7 Vii: •• ••2 aryls t-ii� ..m„•.•1 1111 ".eel °- -�- r ��r� tiro .°"^_ 111 ...460114'ink Ip: .a .... o. °``\�I'7•. • B ..,e'w'e...:.w.a 1111.rr..�•.c (Os.\^",k %�1A\\ • ® .w.....-P»... ,........... 1111..., �•�a; 2- at •O'Lll ME M ,. Demo OTWACTIM• L•• • 0:1• . •. • i..�Pe Yr.w BULDfO 10,▪8110.10101.1 1.1 /�#l' ( U ..0a..lLAM AA 0.w x1•,:: •11.7.10 AMMON ® A....,.,. ..1«. ..M.. �1`\F;•ae • JACKSON BUStESS . • rwwlt.•O1.1+.•,....o .....o.,. %1'-? \1�_ cen • YAM y . 1..L C.•• "46..146 I•: -\ 7190,71100 S.M.PUR$IAM R0. p �.r,\ _ ; f• 1/1A∎ `1 TIARA,OR 17773 • I.:�r• .r.�iL'iu:.c��l •fm��rur 111 4.11.1.11..,0.0..'11 �•i • //// Iw\.iG •;7; \\\\\7.x.10.\\�\� QM I i I 1 I I i DAVE)AErzc6i LANDSCAPE NOTES ;� It 6 .°.17. ,..r.,... .a..'�WALL.0up•m..m....1 CAe;°,e o«.. �1tit `i..h/ .•.aR. 4 Pa. 11-]15-m O 7.410 MR',Tay.•,1a1•m. ii.ir el, CiAtT a�.sWI :.,.o.K,a.'."'e seal. 1.20. ....."1.e0.0..M,....TACAMA.1.e..C.e 1 I x..,1111 UL • ,..,0...0101..•........o..0'Cm WA....0• �.A �.)l!U�� •• P.•./11x �. `.^.1.1.101•01.O'M 1,000'U.. .,.0....,.1.•nNom its♦•' If- 41v Oyr..,.. R •111•0.0111.01.1404 VlbeLLY At ALL well.Mr..004 AMI t+ aanM.�-yh •• `�.46U:...,."•'. roe r..l.....m.e �Inr 3: 1.1.1...��1'U{ l••y:•�. •. .'s!!/.. ---- ° • 1111 m.11•a0.. ydiili /4W %iil0 %iltb .1.0 e•...a .�. .111-11CA.o 0 001. 2» •""r LANDSCAPE PLAN nborrni LANDSCAPE PLAN T 1 .2 ! n .w a•.weHw s..k.•Inc. / of .\ muars.i•ria.aar ---�� n.. aim --�� ra M 101-313 &W.DURHAM ROAD •.. `` I nom "" "' �• . . !Ipppr, � i % sip+ i ■ • I ^�1Pl�11VR ■M.^!�����EMIAP ' i -i1 i I •i . . ' .I � .tea.... i 1 _ Vii 1[ Mora A ii �•� . JACKSON If ''.• T BUSNES3 I I • CENTER I ': ; 71I 7100 S.W.CARMAN RD. i I I MAR%a 07223 CLINI I 1 1..�jl AT∎Tel'�li.∎.w�m`.Iu���� u� r AW METZOBi I ' I —� '� i IIII I I�� 7 9 i' R,71711701 "Mr.. i i L II r / sir. r rad I ',' i D,... a► I I oar y AA 1 AA Mu a + - onwy M.:M R.j.V.I...j______ r' ill . OAD _____ OHALMJO PLAN Wal 7 GRADING PLAN . 1 .3 MATER OOMC.NOIS IRMA CRL1112 N01. a��iiiii�il lii i I 4 I .,.n.w,.,.Nrb.,..r.w.��bLLDV. ® RAb ■■,\•.....r... n■.wL L ..L nowt aYl../ �1i■.1110LNucUieiop I .�e.`l..r•.I.,TMbfw lewwT.l root wa.b..w..n1i �.+n.11ve1M` file..Yti. I ; WIfAR(RVra1 N7101 0.....n ob.ronammrwiinw..Oft...r 1m SSf�f.i•NVSDN Of �\ ...w L �,v.mows.b no on sowM HC �11CN y.�■T POI 02 MI 99-30P 1MMDWIR PLAN NR RPM PPP HORN Lou.w w.0 vrain.Ant PAM.. moan..cur.110.,a•A•w �+..c....n.a nos•IS. ��,_` POW 1.....0... L.b.':rte ..w B.W.DUFFIAM ROAD TO iwWwmv w LL.N ■•r O..AMmn na.warWw=OK a•Mw' MML IIO.f L1.1•11aOMt a.MV �W.1 _ . ierm ne KM EIS." UT.4.0L 11.410.4000 Ma. i L. MI = 011 Mir Z ■6b&El ,o :%..tea pp..�w,Ys —i— -�'L.i 11�-.Y.c N1OR� im I. r 1 Ili . MOONED MAUI' fACU1' 1 ® m S) • t. • .w rw• wt.���lil.hl I I .. : 2 ■ ' II'1 /.`1,t I g r'I/ ,4 111 0 ■' t1xfL! +,4yl. – II `"` _I a E���/ ......r .c or.,...,,.�.x [ BULONO • ADDITION UFO., ■ �� .„..,.• �' JACKSON 12 • -�'i1" : ; ; 7100.7100 S.x.OU■11AY■0.'� n.or..r rv.� r-r I Tr6M0,OR 0714] GDk .• .r:.: ••••••••.. ,.. •L t DAVID METZQf3i 4.••••r•.0).P.m v. IP' 4111All I II N :fade IL ...7 MAW a1 ii a1■.: OWN Cill:=1.= � �� .u..1rt■. r-sAana "•=X11111*• 4 I I:: !- � ` ". — ........ . ._..— --- .... FAC■ TE8 RAN 9fi T A7 SYRUP,m. sv«+nr.rr..sA.r. sr...r a s.r...,r.. FACILITIES PLUM mi.Ps. 4 Q Q Q 0 II- I I I a .4.011:111a..w.uur rev r..9.• •a ra.r w u,.Gw,.brel•i U V•Inc WO i.9.bollm Il•.fA1 lwi 97.VN ..III 11 H r." PR OHM at p.q w-xx I ..� I i 1 1..1 i I H I III � I i i i i 1 • i 1 i I gli i II .TM,M.. MUM ..m,m. �....... a1.0p0 ■ . 4 ADDCT ON : II I I JACKSON CENTER 7199.7999 S.W.DURHAM RD. 71GARD,GR 97223 902 i DAVID AETZC E R w.ORAN a... 9a. 11-21-99 I . nu M N. 9110901 ra w.•r. rr sAM' Ir~ I . I I I I i I BOOR PLAN w BOOR Tt w SHEIT 2.1 .. •-'�'- •••C...vy.u...__.Me. .m 9.Or 9w1•II Y m.Alm ens Pi 0 .►s. J 90 063)111.s.. Mo■■■oll■■o■ uo■o■ao■o■■m:M1011111a■■■vu:I 1:11111111111112111111112111111M3 9= - ' ! � i I a • =IWILT. ERIE .Ti■ N = !MU UI I MU-- an= i . N. itHi,"311111 J,4 H l0EN UI?d 801tl ../11.0.1'..11..,..M..N.. US It WED/4•P1 mll 4/No.ma K DOI 0 Q Q Q 4 61 0 , r pq 01-11 I I ~.....°° I le I I _ � • 11513.1211e• _ nu — .��umu..' .. .4„ / . OEAST-WEST SECTION 4 4 4 4 4 PROM ..wNI.An. •Nra\suuu•uu\u••uranimist■■t■■■•r,iu JACKSON �-A- -. .nm'.r wwnw •�• 7800 LW.WRIU11 RD. rAI MM. BUSNESS IM^ tirc...wo,raw Q igMD,011 ,7tl3 i.'n.e u.'aee. DAVE/AETZGER ..�. ... ow. ,xeo r—'-7—1 r—'`� i� s's'1 IA''Yd u. 0, Mwar IF i 'MIti 01010$ 0_,u P-Mrs ONORTH-SOUTH SECTION • • BULDPJO SECTIONS MT 4.1 • z , FROM : NICOLI ENGINEERING FAX NO. : 503 684 3636 Jul. 24 2000 11:19AM P3 :CM 5 S __4 U,411114 !� i� i i 1 ____ 1 i if .. • II III (mummit Ai v rw .� Ti:• ig in i: E r / --zzEszy ! gg V I I I l�¢ I_ r il 1111 :� l3 e a 1: 3 I (III I I • t—%7115 a iti I , .. it •�Ui:t,*m'e"e�AgAt$lEva y If. ' ,/ ere �'- =^ N ;� �.; � f • IR►dw®LM8 i 8 I it .����[. + .,.. • 1 f 1 . sl : ill li II I 1 :, hit i i 11 i ill I i!I ! IA hi i � I : ' i Ei ii I f .: lb II 11 � _ _ 111L 11 ; 1 1 hi i 1 i L 1! f F. kVI►\MI IISINIIMIEMi1 I\•II\,RIj11611I TlBRP, ■ :14:TIME MOEN aLrAiN01418! and Construction Services Inc. U :_ __ 9025 SW.Center Street N P.D.Box 2376 1 (p L � J _ nt.-,-,. D J 7 jL J © Tea aeon 97223� ° 0n Phone FAN (503)62D-2066 503)661 3636- 7.___L-1[1- • WV ano.\,i Q \ wilcs c$J v © v a o a Ja ASS° ( C vi p „IN p, ,____A ii ,. ,, r ED' ,gyar a, 0gon�rie • REVISIONS: ABBREVIATIONS BUILDING INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ADJ. ADJACENT MECH. MECHANICAL BUILD MG CODE, 1791 UDC IW OREGON AMENDMENTS DO GENERAL INFORMATION AFF. ABOrE FINISH FLOOR MN/ N. MINIMA ALT. ALTERNATE MISC. MISCELLANEOUS SITE AREA 41,2/.1 SF. 0J COVER SHEET ALL.11 ALUMRilt MM. MONT./MOWTED APPROJ< APPROXIMATE Mil_ METAL BUILDING AREA 10320 SF. ARCA. ARCHITECT WC. NOT N CONTRACT OWNER-APPLK.ANT *FORMATION 10 SITE NPO RATION O. BOARD NO. NUMBER CONSTRICTION TYPE. TILT-UP CONCRETE DAVID MlTL3ER NICGLI SNGMEERMG,INC L SITE PLAN BLDG. BUILDING NCH. NOMINAL PO.BOX 775 90711 SW CENTER en 12 LANDSCAPE PLAN CA. CLEAR ANODIZED IAFA. NEAR SIDE AND FAR SIDE OCCUPANCY. ASSUMED 4 F 61ERWOOD,ORESC14 17GARRD,OREGON 51723 LS GRADING PLAN N.TO. NOT TO SCALE (5031 670-206/. 14 FACILITIES PLAN OZ. CN CENTER CONSTRUCTION. V-N CONTACT.JAMES D.ANDREWS CEPt CEMENT OD. OUTSIDE DIAMETER CER CERAMIC OPP. OPPOSITE 7D BUILDING PLANKS C.J. CONTROL JOINT T.T. PRESSURE TREATED SrTE INFORtvIATION 2J FLOOR PLAN CLa CEILING TJ_/PLAN•, PLASTIC LAMINATE DEFERRED PERMITS ,ID ELEVATIONS COL cONCRETe MASONRY UNIT PCC PATTEIRUCD COLORED COJCRET[ PROJECT: COL. COLUMN PL7'IID. PLYWOOD � ADDRESS 7190 8/LL DOWNY 1NL'+AD CONS CONCRETE PN7./P.T. PANT TI 4RID,OR 37223 3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS CONT. CONTS410.16 P90. PENCIL SH.ARR°E•ER BOARD ELECTRICAL BUILDING CORK CORRIDOR O.T. 011ARRY TILE COPOENT ZONING, IP PLA'1ED INDUSTRIAL 40 SECTIONS C.T. CERAMIC TILE RAD. RADIUS P CMANICAL DEN. DETAIL REPRO. REFRIGERATOR CURRENT USE, 654015 PAMLT REsiceNcL 4J BUILDING SECTIONS P".✓✓I I M1(I� DIAL DIAYITEre RDl ROOF DRAIN LEADER PLUMING JACKSON DN. DOWN PEW RER5ORCEJ-E T PRO°06F-0 USE, LEAeE SPACE/ONR= MU DOWN 6 1JT PEm. REQUIRED DESIGN CRITERIA I"'�`/O1eE'""'"''"""'°"'° VICINITY MAP BUSINESS DNS. DOWN SPOlT FE0. RESILIENT EA EACMNY ISM RECESSED ELEC.WIT(EATER LEGAL DESGIdPTKN. TAX MAP. 261 f164 LIPS. EXCH 50 ROOM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE Bom SAIL rASeuMED/ SITE,u 471sT eF.(leeRl 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. S EXTERIOR INSULATION N RO ROUGH CONrtIR 11GARD, OR 97223 AND FMIMN 6Y67EM ec SEALED CONCRETE EJ. EXPANSION JONT SC. SOLID CORE BASIC HAND SPEED. 60 MlrTl EXPOSIPIE 6 BUILDING AREA JOl70 S.P.OM)ELEC. ELECTRICTT OR ELECTRICAL 65. S0 4R[FEET ELEV. ELEVATOR SCC SMOOTH COLORED CGNC1ETE IMPORTANCE FACTOR.10 E EQUAL 6NT. SHEET A6P�L41-T PAVRIG, 1I.e0i 6F.ISSSJ EXIST. EXISTING ST. STAN SEISMIC ZONE, 3 L7JENT. f73><l LAND6CAPP41Y EXP. EXrANSION NFL SIMILAR N0040 6F. EJJ1L ELECTRIC WIT NEATER STANDARD. STANDARD Rxh DL•! AI.•MED1L PARCWS, 31 TOTAL DAVID MERGER EXT. EXTERIOR 51 STAGGER SNOW•125 PEP.•DRIRNG PD. FLOOR DRAM OIL STEEL STANDARD SPACES 34 FEZ. FIRE EXTC'INJISHER CARNET 6TOR STORAGE SAC. FIRE 1106E CADRET STRRICT. STRUCTURE ADA lHCJ SPACES, 1 R.I. FINISH **P. SUSPENDED ALR FLOOR 571914. 6YNTtgTIC VAN-FOOL, I R < < Dote: 6-26-00 ROB. FACE OF BRIO( TOE TOP Dr STEEL BICYCLE PARKA T RECEIVED PLANNING n , POS. FACE OF WILD TEL. TELEPHONE Drown FAT. FIRE RETARDENT TREATED TMC THICKNESS / Drown by Di OALV. GALVANIZED M. Trnr•, SW DURHAM(RD. 07P. GYPSUM LION./Iwo. LSLEEE OTHEIa1A5E D 1 Checked by. LA •NOT. 1EIGNT UIIL. UTILITY NU Job No.: 990904 WORM HORRZCNTAL VL.7. VINYL COMPONTIDN TILE JUN 2 8 2000 11t 11O5R VERT. VERTICAL SCHOOL HGH x1ooL Drawing No.: P—COVER NSIL INSULATION WG. IW1ER CLOSET , JET. JOIST WO. wooD CITY CF TIGARD aEW IIEER.4GE If JOINT W . WATER PIROOPIIG LAM. LAMINATE WT. I1EIGI4T FACILITY MA MASONRY OPENING U WE. GILDED WIRE FADRIC • MACH MACHNE Ulf WI714 DURHAM MAX MAXI PI WINO WITHOUT XTG. DaE150 PLANNING APPROVAL SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET � 0. 1 Spit ji060 or OW/tip �ru►.�ef�� �n 1►\■I/I/�/I■101■11 I\■1111,•uA11■el �IPTPRI■ Q JC411/91■►ACM JCCid►IIIIP! / I ,\ and Construction Services Inc. — — — — — — — �1----- • I 9025 SI.Center Street•P.O.Box 23784 - ----____---—-- —�_ Tfgad Chien 97223 I al. I — — — _ Phase (503)620-2086 FAX: (503)684-3636 S.W. ■ ROAD ` — 4mK --------'-'-�_- ` ` I CR06614 —— _ ExlefM3 APPRCCH TO BE 11 PROPOSED NEW P—O—OS D E X I ST'�NG \ CLOSED 4 REPLACED 4I .cCE55 APPROACH — ` \ \ 0 0 `--� :. — CRICKET , yFr# �. '—, - /GUTTER PXIGI I. -19. . -. — \ `� METER � A � I —\ ROOF ORAN EXISTING enNaL • -..•...- --`— _ POLEerBO7H •�•.:...........�...._•..' ExlerSrsAwTARr ••• n SELLER PU1P \ IT A16LT8DES='�J I .\ / t• TO EE REMOVED. I ,I- / O � I' .�' 111'"•• I ,�4 1//4/1. STORM WATER `.. :�� •'-�•_,-O• / n QUALITY FACILITY `• _---- POLE D(16TM5 I !1,iIr :1211EXIGTING FIRE NYDIfA/•IT \ SLOPE --I GUTTER I °�I-F•� = . �.J ,\,, I FlE•WDFRMIr ••1 I FOR STORM I%_4_ NG I HYDRANT = I j •� GUTTER t 6 I DRAM.Yf j I L : i i ROOF PLAN 1. . ` –i—M- -EX-Tn1a„ it 1 eA.NN,- • !R$ I = ■ -• Roar WALL AREA re— — =!/%0 : _ • _ I 31E."'-" • REVISIONS: .. § IVEI MOO•ySORSIPIRRIZMI WtPAMINIiiitIMMINV SSZI■■■NI■■■■■■■•\\\\\\•■■■■■■■NI■■\\\\\\111•■E■I/�IN v A LANDECAPE =. •� � � j��� !^ _ ^! �4wn■I■7 ® '—� •-------•--•-----� • o 1 I THIS BITE eHDSN FOR K'-0' CCNTNUrT T OF ERE ,. ` ••:•.. CIRCLLATION/PARKING EXISTING STRUCTURE ;T•,∎•, Ma1_ ■ I - A ' WORMS CWT.NOT PART CP APPLICATION covE�c� ,,,: • 'PATIO %// a' • (�. + . 1 ', \ ° I r EXISTING STRUCTURE j PROJECT: PROPOSED ADDITION PROPERrr LINE 21000 6f. I ;•'- N'-0••a0'-r LOCATION PRIG TO BUILDING pp 109ae er. LOT LNE AD.JUETMEM A t I-, - n. A4 ADDI'M, 0 1150 5111 DURHAM RD. \'i/' EXISTING 8TR)CT.I E �I'-- CURD/ OD,AJeTED PROPERTY LINE i •TAN LOT.300 OFFICE/U1NI E. 8E/MAMFACTURRY• 510011IIK 1 JACKSON 21000 Sr. 1A1" ;0. FA 1 I e„ BUSINESS !:II.- CENTER it \` , Y I' • ,.` LANDSCAPE i 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. -CHAIN LMC . ' TAX Lm,2C ,, •- • ,EEpp11 e�P a b TIGARD, OR 97223 FENCE •1 1500 S1LL DURHAM RD. '•`'I i .;•• U 1 ,.:I •; r I CUNT: _`1, - - j °"■Ji ►. ... sMTwlln____ rlJrtl` LAN IIII ���P� h •�:1• • 8z///. 5a911EV 6:':1WR•61115e.FN\\ 1NIDe+1}I \ \ EIMMI•M• \\\\\\\■MM•r■•u•��■\\\\\\\ ■u•IN MI E �, �.�/. 4,1%L : ■ TRUCK YTANIVERNG 1 I I I I I I • : : '•� I DAVID ME I L�R isi • . STAGING AREA • q , • 1V.Z %,��- PR Ea IY LNT •- ' - - 8 Ell 74N,-- r1Ctcare • i Date: 6-26-00 0' �aL; (/70 DE RELOCATED �'1i $COI•: 1' 20' _—f F�" !�•. I. �:•. �- E BICYCLE PARING I Drawn by. DJL 4 6P�e Checked by JOA .d•,7►^�wrrwr"w,c,,.�_ •rI• b'-r 21'3 V4• 33'-0• 25 S• Job No.: 990904 —_ „.- .G., "41lA.°+.'�ta`i`%1,, !u1•` %LO`'r,.`-%I,�`-'),o" !ca` 4;Ir'--EXTRIDED I Drawing No.: P-SITE CHAN LNK GAT! •••�- CURB LIGHT I . ` \ d LSE LOCATION 7 CONGIiQrE • 74'-4' Ti'-E• 1-C 1 SPCA•Y-0'•.Y-0' -VAN POOL PAllCltl PItlOR TO ADJIMTE C EXISTING CONDmONS PARKING CALCULATIONS SITE INFORMATION TIE FOLLOWNS AMMPTTIONE LLNERE EITE....EA-4� 41231 6!. (100%) :�• _ -----__—• AD•AM119 PROPCRTI- MADE FOR DETERMINE*THE REQUIRED ..'.••.-.••_••.•_• •w•.••v t.•r - ...•.••• .•••: ,•.r..................(.•:..•..• LNL NJ'•DER OF PARKING SPACES. EUILDRMG 105520 5P. (22%) -• ��•- 146,-0• LANDSCAPE OFFICE•(2.1/1000) (••Ee%•9}16) LANDSCAPING-10040 5r. (23%) AREA •52 8PACE8 WAREHOUSE•(OD)1000)—x•30%•30561 PAVE—ENT—WW1 51•. (EE%) ►•/pR'rIF4 •2 SPACES PARKING 31 SPACES TOTAL PROPOSED EXISTING SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 34 STANDARD SPACES LIGHT I•IDUeTRIAL•(If/1000)—(43%•1341) I TRUCK MACE 1••20' SHEET •3 WAGES 2 DISABLED MACE• (1 vAN ACCE56I15LE) 1 BICYCLE PARKING 1 . 1 SPACES(I LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING) 1 • TREE SCHEDULE - ) .. I '•IA'VasM1Mt. • OTT S7YEOL `°""CI £ as SPACNG 1 ` I►\�I�I���I�1111�11 DOTANIt:AL NAME \�17/LE:741111.11 1 and Construction Services Inc. �'1•'� s DOUGLAS FIR O �• • ,� PeELDOteIJaw M1ENZEeIU ■1—_--' C. ----------------------- — — 9015 St Caller Street•P.O.Box 73784 :'- w _ not Crept 97223 ..cat'►ii ROC (503)620-2096 • ;';S SEQUOIA �', AS NOTED -48v's SEO.JOIA eEMPERVIRENS S.W.DURHAM ROAD FAX (503)664-36.36 OAK • I (QIERCU6 COCCMEA) W b NOTED I\ I 4! GRAND FIR M• b NOTED -- ' I . ��� ' J + (ADIEDNODILIS) .r..#,A1---‘1 4- t AVM 10 ?'•''i SEQUOIA eQUOIA VIRE46 L•• A°NOTED • 'xtj':Y.s It • ...•. .. b/, •... a•4;y;V 4. ■ Fa CLEAR VISION .................... °• E: ® `"•4' ! AREA—�'', r ,, • _.1 I•` �.. _ •'� EXISTING FIR 4' I 1 (fiEleClb COCCelA) IS• b NOTED WATER QUALITY L� •� TO R£M14N ,, -t,�- PALILRY•F'UWT k. / AiGimani SE!SHEET L4 .•Q .f ,��• her 1'' OE 2 =V� PIN OAK W AS NOTED • •' ..j ,•."�.`_:''.,.•: i, ■nt C ERCU6 PALL•TTE6 • •;. rwyy fl{���A es �.tiv�l 1 rT� + I, = zs ® COMPACT MANIAS dial !I'm,• EJJOM'FIJs ALATA CGMPACTA SOIL CANS b S440YN 1, * F .1 3 » T-S•• b ellowl t`/ T' FIR TO .. * ��1l'I 1M KOWA Z RETIAN .- ME 1 ACES C•eCMATitI ••V• A6 SH°IW l' • w`I IIl1\ __ _I• ROYAL RED 1'1,{M'LE NIA'• b DHOIW CXIDTMG GHAM ACER PLAT 4L IDES 167YAL RED I • ` * 1 3 CONVEX JAPANESE HOLLY LINK FENCE .�t 16 \�' . I • !O ® ILEX VRCNATA CGNVEXA S GAL.CANS 4'•0'OG i4 A..' . `11�±T- 40 0 « REV SIGNS: DIA 7 GAL CANE b eHOIw RELOCATEp ." �: ■■■■r�,y�1���q�■�����A■���!1C:_ S/,�t\:/"{{!�\II■■■■■■■■■■■■\�� OAK /=\�� �. •vim t4:Jlii'li !+S'.•9 ..-�i44 1.`' lTA ILA�M 16 0 EMERALD ARDORVITEA 4-S'• b SFIOSN Rs •.:?'w;1i•..7.. •• - 4` if:s ,,i‘ TNUJA OCC.eMARAGD ",4,i 1 20 ® OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL 21-74•• b ENOIIN imoli t 1 T F76/1M LAJI!olio LUTT<EH RLl . \1��1%i 1 r• 4 0 __' F'Rl1S MUGO FU11LI0 •-16.• A S110uN NEW IB7IX GALL .i-: !�� ��_ c h:)4,• \AN,%,4.4 1\ 2 h EX16TNG TREED ARE _.li(l�•' DWMa T EW 11-74'• b e�IOIJN I�11/f TO CE RELOCATED ALa1Y. I/ 1 TAMJS QJSPIDATA NANA 44....!"� ���.' M ShcT11 4 uESt PI4►7P£RT7 LNE♦�S t/ 1 • 0 DOUBLRILE VIBURNI7 S41r1L CANS AS MGM �f////1 \��)/� 1._n•• • v1IDRH17 TG'IXTO6.11 //'�Ij , X11 I ® VIdiNI DAVID! - II�Kj • •� . 21 •GAL.CANS 4'-0'OZ. �� 1,.:•.J 0 ,I-4 -iii el H �'. AZALEA WINO-CRIMSON ]GAL..CANS A6 S140SN "TWA (1) • IS COMPACT HEAVENLY SAI E00 : •;�i O D GAL-CANE A6 SNODN +`t;',(•'-i �,�///_, ki156.0d NMDNA oar cenu CL1 PAGTA ? /�ljG VV 4 ® MT.PIKE PIER)e •GAL C-MN b 641ouN - /�„ /'. [7cISTMG DTI6JCTtJRE EUONTMUS ALATA COI'rACTA %% �" Y• • PROPOSED ADDITION t. • • SWORD TERN �I�l�`! , •r••0•.IJe•-0• NI T PROJECT: PoLTSTICtM MWrTII'1 1 GAL.CANS b 01401IN .: 10!70 SP. (� #' •■1 DL TO TO MOVE Tlxs PRE! BUILDING SARCOCCOCA RL)6FOLLA 1'i15;' 0 DUE TO INADEQUATE ROOT I•r 4 • S GAL GI.41 b SHCIIN - •m: : STTN6JGTLIYE. ADDI I�N �•i JACKSON RHOpODETDRON MNAH KRU6KE _.}SIQW 6 1 ■ VA♦rf�a7tJ1\21 2 01 4 RHODODENDRON GLUE DIAMOND � ■ BUSINESS ® •-••. A6 eHOIw �I(\t • IY c.,• CENTER 46 ER DWARF PURPLE OaER 7 GAL CAw b 6HOIW .3 i- 7 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. slLac PURFlJ1iEA NAJVA :,'.t�l. ■ -:51` ') ; �j�,` • EXISTING TREED TO de RELOCATED " �� ■ l TIGARD, OR 97223 +EXIeTNG TREES TO RJ31AIN 1 • ■n///l,<�+r•• Nam„,��L'i• .• \\\\\ °��I��\\\\ WENT: LANDSCAPE NOTES �;� ■' % I I I I?I I DAVID METZGER L ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL EE PROVIDED W/AN SRIOAT• . l�f '+ it`=.= \��1 Vol, 1,- SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IRRIGATION• '0 THE CITY ;O . Dote: 6-26-00 OP TLGUm FOR APPROVAL F REOU11•®. . �'•• •”-i �� Scale: 1'-20' ._ _ I"•, Ip /► .� ...%��`\l`1 S BICYCLE PARKING 2.ALL RANTS SHALL=WORM TO ALL APR - - AHDARDe of ��ti��/,j [ I ePAC'ED Drawn by. DI THE LATEST EDITION Q THE'AMERICAN STAND FOR NURSER,-STOCK• ; . ��`1r�f��`1•'� Checked by. 990 f''` ;,,.4—WADED ` Job No.: 990904 s.PLANTING BEDS,PR vIDE Q• 1 Drawing No.: P-LAND M•4, -LOAM SOIL AT PLANTING BEDS `;� :: IaNT f�(1``�I 9 UU 3'MM.MEDIIIt DARK OR LEAP L. CIS />/ 4.TREEe 4 eC4.4 aRT AT • • --POINTS TO 61TE SHALL BE MAINTAINED N .n�•#..!, --"�Ir - POLE --:,.'��1 , . ORDER 07 FReONDE A -0'CLEAR V161CN AREA NO OB6TRJCTION6 :: - _.� ve � ARE ALLGVED B •FEET 460v!GRADE N 1T1E63 AREAS. _ N n .t�t ) c1 - S.P*C1.IDE - . 'FENCING-AT ALL EXISTING TREE&UN1CH ARE 40.',,,..m`' !SS Ib' 1�'11�-- -- •-- TO .- • • -TE AT DRIP LINE OF TREES TO DE SAVED. Yen\•/. �*' • 'j., iii ��i1 r K- ►illi •• •.ALL •SCMED AREAS SHALL DE CONTINJCU6l7 MAINTAINED MD f:. J� •��I J��n .• ,-� ,7'/�� •.... . 6UD6TANTIALLY SMILAR TO THESE PLANS. `�1 I. . �n/%__-. l`\�'ntn n•,:--/�` i n. .: (1 ...: n n // —_.—_—_—___.—.__._—.- .OVER 13%OP 1FE EXISTING TREES ARE TO DE SAVED.THEREFORE A /�-����` ����•' ' '� \~ ���"��`` MITIGATION PROGRAM 16 NOT RECLIIRED. RELOCATED GGNTNIE ROCK • SEdJOIb IIJALL TO MATCH LANDSCAPE PLAN EXISTING r L.AN NORTFI LANDSCAPE PLAN s 1ET.2 1'•70' �rlro��.�..■rr ` i►vu1rag lnl■u 1 i•P •••11 �� i J■ itonso■ai acme O RI 1 and Construction Services Inc. 54 St Center Oregon 97223 ,P.O.Box 23784 Tigr ' o/ \ --- - - - --Q Phone (503)62-3086 •—__—_—_— FAX (50.5)684-3636 ---- • S.W.DURHAM ROAD 7 .1. A ' -" 0 • • 0 Rill•ID►]e �• �_ ` J ■ _ , M CATCH j :I:Ji.i7 \•� r \ p+ / I • • .' ■ REMbvE Exle 9r AG r • T •:a . ■ •AvE A•RE-JIB-FOR • l ' ; CATCiLDAeOL • • — i i El MI REVISIONS: Rai 11.11,6 Or.. LE/4,47 ,......" • ■. „yam Ai i MI I I t.i----- !■■■■•■■r■•■■■■■•U■■11tUUlII•■■•■■■1111■•■•\\\\\\'■II•■•■■■■■\\\\\\.......0 ,' : ^��n� !M - ►I! unwnio■■� - � I ••:• I R:P1 D3.s2' 1( ■ I I I ■ ( J1 ■ I ;. II Is• I I I 1 :I 111■ I �. _,■ I ExIeT NG CURB To OE REMOvED •1 I -- , I PROJECT:•1 V///II I �.I]ING ,,. Exl•TNG•TRICTIJRE .: I f..' rNIeH FLOOR ELEV.•6682' FINIeH FLOOR ELEV.•I••e]' I U CKSON l.•. S =1. I BUSINESS I 1i ■i CENTER 4. I i a I 7190. 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. I ■ I 71GARD, OR 97223 .• I ■ •,•:. ■ WENT: ■ =1 i I■ Lii limaiL:�iii.I��■=mrur ru�Iur MI. DAVID MERGER 1 ••:.. ■ :■// .' �■ NMI \ M■■� \\\\\ 11∎■�M■\\\\\\\\■MINNI■■:■■■��■\\\\\\\\■■■___nr C6-2 I • .. / ; '.� I Will I I • `4 I Date: 6-26-00 .j i RIM D3A2' . I i ■ _ ��� Scale: 1"�20' 1 ''••� w. I I i U Drown by. DJL 1 I ►"'' Checked by. JDA Job No.: 990904 II Z•.•. � I Drawing No.: P-GRAD 1 ______-Di,--—_ \ 4:e. ___I .,,..;.0 • • • • —'— — I Er --------- --------__� GRADING PLAN NORTH SHEET GRADING PLAN I..20' 1 . 3 • WATER SERVICE NOTES STORM MANAGE NOTES .■1.r.......u.t •A 2••POTABLE WATER LINE WAS 6TUBDED TO THE PROJECT •ALL I'IPERVIOUD& ACED alAL1T,•FLOW TO A TUT STATION' ` I'�1,\\,\�A11..1 S Srt!Dl1wNG THE REV10U6 PHASE TWIG LINE WILL DE UTILIZED WA ICF PUt Pe TF!WATER TO A G .Al4IZED PITCH BAaIR• TlPR■ FOR THE WATER SUPPLY TO THE PRPOSED e1UCT RE. ULERE THE WATER FLOWS TO A MANFACTURED WATER QUALITY LIMA'S ►�I:iM JI x.•11 ►TIII!! I ( I AND DETENTION FACILITY.FROM HERE THE'TREATED'WATER 1 ' I •THE•••HYDRANT LME WILL BE EXTENDED TO THE NEW GRAVITY PLOWS TO THE EXbT1 6••STORM BRAN LSE N Construction Services Inc. HYDRANT NEAR THE:LEST F+ROPERTY LINE. J 44r1 ROAD. SANITARY SEWER NOTES 9025 St Center Street•P.O.Box 237M / 1 it3 GENERAL 1FOtwlATtoN TIgerQ Ortgon 97223•A 4•SANITARY SELLER L. Wba STUBBED TO THE BITE WITH \ THE DURHAM ROAD IMPRoyMENTS. THIS ExISTING LSE WILL BE INFORMATION ON EXISTING UTILITIES AND FACILRES WAS MUSED /' • `' EXTQLED r0 THE BUILDRYs FR'A`I ME OWNER BITE VERIFICATION AND•Aa-BUILT•DOCU•arte Ph= 503)620-2086 FROM Wows PeIEFOIE TED ON 63/DUw4M ROAD. FAX: (503)684-3636 COCIRAL?OR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING -—-—-—-—-—- I �--_____ -_--__-__-._-.,---._- LOCATIONS OP ALL UTILITIES AIL FACILITIES. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR BUSED PPE T I994O i I - _ _ _ INSPECT TRENCH AtEDIATELY AMER CONSTRICTION,THREE TIES A YEAR ' FOR TWO YEARS,AND MWALLY THEREAFTER SBPECTIf7NS SFIOULD _ Lop(FOR•CNDNG AMER LARGE STORMS,ILNICH WOULD DE AN INDICATION S.W.DURHAM ROAD �' OF CLOGGING. HIND INSPECTIONS SHOULD ALSO BE DOLE N TE UPPER DURHAM ___- -J--------------------------------- ----- _-.`._ LAYER OF SURFACE TRENCHES TO CHECK FOR EXCESS aOGGNE ------------•-- -- -----_-•-•-- . RIM•■e.l' -•-------- �..\-_` M CATCH-_• IE EAST.■ M' Rim•■1i' --_ _ -\- P1F'E SIZING 1446 BEEN DETERMINED BY THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. RIM•69' IE. NORTH•7110.3V IL• •1130.16' CXISTNr.ELCCI.KJ L -� _ • TABLE It-2 WING 3.CV RAM PER HOUR IE-•e&14' O.eS 6.000323 SWITCH vAILT WY 4•• RIM•6635' • _ ,\•' LIE NQ 1 1 CONDUIT MIMED D TO -.� +we.r�7.•S■+•t r-SHi:3 6TtL IE•B2D2' `. _. AREA• 2,•00 Sr.• 4••LINE _-_. •. Hy�.'1 �r� -. (ROOF) , I �f►. AW-- . .-. LIE No.2 AREA• 23,00 SP. . 8500 ar. • 7te00 err. IsAOO err. : . ' r .•••••••••.••••.6..:.. `-`.� (LSE U (CD NO.I) (ROOFDRAN•E• •••LINE • ...i'4.. ''•...�....... ____.� . .•. •� .p" - ELECTRIC ExteTING SS.PUI'1P O �\ LIE N0.3 ■ ,•:„..,•�^M v CONDUIT TO \� STATION AND LINE % AREA• S)<O Sr. • S••LaE ! �,:• _ TO BUILDNI I (ROOF) •6Tt7RM TREAT` • • •• 0 I!�•.13019' t. B BUILDING .y j EXLLTNG `r WATER DUALITY • O. ° (FIELD VERIFY) p EXISTING CATCH LINE MO.4 PACE ITT BASIN DCDV AREA• (CB NO.7r. • •••LINE � 6TA TON �° it EXITING 41). ` uuTH DouBLE. I '11-1114 LI'E NO.ti - o.. tc•_ • :. a (•� eUPP DUe rrr _I ` , R 1.160' • A-= BASIN ■ = •• AREA• Sp00 err.•■)100 6r.•5200 Dr.•D(CC P. •39J00 err. 24 IF.CUT•ENE' ��.: I (CB NO.L (LINE 2) (LSE 3) (LSE 4) •ID•• 4••E.N•Bee Gll ■ t1r -. ••., `� ••..• e'•H1'DRAH(T_ __ -_-L 0■ ._._EXISTNG P FKDRMR LSE • .-_____--_.._._._.______- :• V. - -to.._.._.._____..___.._.._-_.._._. _.-_..---___-_.- ____��_.__.._._. -___-.-_ NOTE, PORTICS C•IMPERVIOUS E WALE WILL DRAIN TO EXISTING - •'• tI pq t ■ = GATGH DASR1(SEE CAiAD►NS I.1.ANA RM•LL0; • 7. • i rovE w�1 .• - — -• IE.OUT•86.91 C 0 - REASONS: . • 1■ NEW LINE WY w a_ TO BUILDING.= ili IN • , ) 1•2173.61)* II IXIATAVG I•%%VIABLE i ._.�._.LNE BTI dMF Y.617E NI 1 t I� L•a03•' -- ••• ' -MIll - '. U ....t.- .tau-IC.152.92' PROPOSED WATER OUALRY/DETENTION FACIITY ■ r Manhole (t.nprpme( • **band pranee aortal(rgFn y), a-.fan ewve(Satiates Mound./11 pane-Moe •:•e • : -- •• �� .plan),and Awned(SparW,Wn 4}T.wetland plant.are tawny bate) _. •• S. mantoNed between Norma by a mn.nam ar w Adige of mite-n I •• . the batten of N.wetland bask. Me standing wafer few . •.e moisture and oap.ry pave,. g / TO.FACLRY - I • s ■. 0 CATCH BASIN �II�AI\ '- •CA LLD3. •:••• E' _.I 1 •I�f�1t1/._�) d Ii_ �tl� (t 4 1' PROJECT: _IIIII,1.� lLIL�.l.— �•r.nr '".!'',SO.. �:•, Iv ,,' EXISTING STRUCTURE i4DD�ION 10Y fMllipU i `'.� �':'",4tJ 1• ej FF.b6D7' J „_ , m JACKSON It.leef,' ■ cera�Span :_. ;� a �.L,•�f . BUSINESS .vr, .•a• qn . Y \/GIB 1 GTl ae!elr AbaNm •~ B IE.•A5•.91' 0.'�ate_ , j`yi:�h /• IE•ID•a' 411 t I I I I t "�r'w.+C14'•`S J • ! 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. ? n• •irr_-:• •�,•• ;. I TIGARD, OR 97223 r am•./ N II :)4Th:•::^; IJE.•INV 4•I 66. L•40' FIN I r H ` CUM r pv 2 (2)PRESSURE P LINES • DAVID METZC3ER • u •` O.-do.pro.decharre.lem•atr per the Wet*an'(.flan lie the STS-Err,) — Rob 1•/4._3 constructed 6•rc of r•r �••F commonly Mw.tn..d.m6 al arp.N. pa _ ii�rrl��rr� r i IrUr Ir1.JiII11rUr LJr ::•• ildTaz/—■■■ ■a\\\\ �■■rm \\\\\ • ••��\\\\\\\\5gil■■�■■��ft\\\\\\\\5■.b��■ .-sow(aor).4e....44,kw . • r ■ IN o,r(aubebato(d.a tanaah) + -' - - ` .NE—I L•a0R1•• s.■01 ••• .- I I i Scale: 6-26-00- 0 • i .. 't E s°x —T■ • , I Drawn by. DJ. Said(no flaw)..sand Warhead short. :V - .••••• • Checked by. MA .an.through wetland.g.ta,,by..torra,A.a / as- -) I Job Na.: 990904 aoeM.Eo., and h anf n Wield l k ,. s s„aneatla,: � ~ Drawing No.: P-FACILITIES "�/ n .flan �.•-40 A•.e.+awed.pp.(an anew- • . ..-- • I I i' V*ocab a Nat*, dan�,.ntotion,a•rror) ^ 4, ��•:• Other�edeearan. •L • `?4,--------- Holding fh.n..aka palm. ......\r raw co fhb,.et!doge / L.1111 ad5t control a_)4AM, go etNanarge c r. n .-_•____•__ _ (by per tI,e t ,,dl.ana,y.pan • • __ - (bY 1•f 025 Into meat.0/•due to occur d..,1. \ Bulkheads d f,t,• cheat __ rate of e o p0. r can .Me outlet th.IeMe.p-/oc. \ ran ---. wipe ay or tn.srs rant•m• d camera w.vana nr.a s.eAnanwrran chamber* .��-------• ----- • Mew can be followed bra drat rola share the ee afrpe •:1111 �. e<ta dam mead "�d pan ES PLAN clawed li SHEET TORM BEAT SYSTEMS, Inc. Specification Sheet of Storm Treat System Tank FACILITIES PLAN • 3176 blab Street,esm.fael.AM 02630 us NABS ND 5.477,760 1••20' (703)770-44I6 . . ( I O Al 0 , �wrn�rr.vANn . . 9 10 NISI 11N1INI N INI I )(WING 111 NI ltlII\PAI I*P I } I I ea'm• I Jti.CrstlotiNJC:dI■otIC y 20'-m^ 2a'-m• i •'-a" and Construction Services Inc. •- .. ' • 3 • D • 9025 SW.Cents Street'P.O.Box 23784 ,.2-n 5/6•NIENIMIENEWIPMERNIEM Tig14 Oregon 97223 IIMINI- T 6'm• Me t'-n v4• Phone (503)620-2C65 . 0 - - -- 13.-0 " � FAX: (503)68h3636 n e n - r` t DO.INEPOUT C Fe A r R I it\ j I .PLN4 OOR E L E V. 66D7' I (FIrCFI E3I6TPi6) A ;`1.. I REVISIONS "SILL Fire ooR OPEA.G / .—WITH 2 FAR RATED A660"eeLr '3010 I I CD__�r -- - __.,k__,,_1: ----II y- --RECE66ED LIGHib I .,. 11 1 6010 I U.\ I I A I ' I I r( IPG ADOv£LPE5E.61 esn ACOVE (RIDGE I l' I I I o PROJECT: !i I ASILL ox DOOR oPENnrab UN 2 HR RATED A66EreLT' BUILDING Q - - --------Ilo f-rsCOLU^w ADDITION I JACKSON �, I 1 I BUSINESS tx A .7 CENTER 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. TIGARD, OR 97223 8 e s CUNT: a r, DoaPel.C,r DAVID METZGER p LPl6D�pxµ nk14' Date: 8-26-00 a ti DOOR © o.K DaoR I — I I I 7 Drawn 1/B"-1'-0 - - - - Drawn by. DI — 2'•n v4 Drawing Na.: P-PLAN f r•n bn• r•n 6/6• 2'-n VS 2'•n bro• 1 Is-n D/6• 15.-II V4• ro-n v4• IV-II bro• 6'-Ion 1/2" 1P44. 111 !/4• 3/4" 3/4' 3/4• f 20'-0' 1 20.0" i 2a'-0" 1. 20'-0" f 6'-0• J 1 Ise I 1 I I NEW I EX ET PCs FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN SHEET 2. 1 _ _ • ` I1iiii MIn IMMIi J\l1uL An1•J - •rIPr-TR■ w D 'I P1■'•:>N l:M.0I! EXISTING ADDITION and Construction Services Inc. 9025 SW.Center Street'P.D.8oz 23784 4 CP 410 Tigard,Cregon 97223 RCCr EEYQID 4 METAL COMM. Phew (503)620-2096 SHORN 0 - - (GREEN) FAX: (503)684-3636---17Nem0omLi m NINNIIIMIEll—_. ._ TDIr rMeLS . ��r I!!•REVEAL • 0 • • ' , 0 • • • / - •, 0 • : pi . PANTED CONC. IRE TILT IP PANELS • =I= __ -- �1I�0 �� � --- ll � o_ � ntn� �ooe M1 STONE r+e _ _ IR • • (1-IATCAI EXIST/AG) \ r NN--------ALLM•PI STOREFRONT UANDON SYSTEM UY TIMED GREEN GLAZING (HATCH EXISTING) NORTH ELEVATION uI.• I_e. QI I I REMONS: a_-METAL COPING W.RECESSED AREA "°"E'°"LIG' ® I'I'I'Fl 11 I'l l'1 I'I1'114 1'11'11'1 FFFFI E G -MIME 2nd PLOOR-- I —1111.11.111.1-111111 rrrrrr- rr1111.1.,r,-,rrrm, P. • maw---IN - rte. I - a� =\ , == M _/o _■M \ \ a WEST ELEVATION In••r-e. PROJECT: BUILDING ADDMON JACKSON BUSINESS CENTER 7190, 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. TIGARD, OR 97223 CLIENT: ADDITION ExleTNG -a .Y-. DAVID METZGER Q Q Cl") 0 Date: 6-26-00 I Scale: 1/1r-1.-0. { �� 1 r Drown 6y. DL JDA Checked EXTERIOR LIGRT -- IN la�ia �1 I 1 I 1 11'1 I I ® _ ❑ p ,� Job Drawing by. P-ELEV t i Drowing No.: P-ELEV N. \ � � - � GENERAL.NOTES II - LI'01— pprim a'-e•x4r-e•OVER HEAD ALIt1MH STQSE9 ALL COLORS OP TIE ADDITION DOOR(ORES) WINDOW SYSTEM UY GREEN SHALL HATCH COLORS CP THE TINTED GLAZING MU NI STRICTURE. SOUTH ELEVATION Ne' r ELEVATIONS SHEET 3. 1 13111111123111111 UUr II1 LSA""•'1 -rlr.-� . w ay•itSy■ilU:N 1ID'MOU;. and Construction Services Inc. • 9025 SM.Center Sired•P.D.Bak 23784 T1gQd,Cregon 97223 Phan (503)62D-2088 O -� © • 0 FAX (503)684-3636 I (YYY1 (Y; � XIeTn� SEI-EATL I I r -n- FF.ELEV.•b]D2' J R TE WED J016i A '-- T74'or O►EN 0Ee J019T AT 24'DG- 1? 9 FUTURE 2b ROOK e. .= ��TA CC11YM TA.OOLLU'N�� . . I ` FF.ELEV..Win'd C=7 T� EAST - WEST SECTION ve••r-e• REVISIONS: 4 4 Q ® 4 PROLCT: I 1 e CoNCRer!r•ANEL eETOND' BUILD I ING _� ero•RYWO0D eHEATHnY ��99 To..n •1 1A2 , ADD N 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I r T I I I i I I I I 1 I I I fi I I----.1 I I I 1 1` JACKSON BUSINESS --- -,- ------- --------------------`�._ _x'�.: k'----------------------------------------- �/_. CENTER I•x=-_� �_ -- -_r --_----- eeAH eETaND �RDOF e7eTEY AT eJILD NG- -_ _--_-_- -_ - � 7800 S.W. DURHAM RD. ��- - -- - ""- i TIGARD, OR 97223 1 'LMK'DE1OND,6NOIW DA&FED. 1 FUTURE 7Ke FLOOR __-- I, _ 1 i ,. C1JENT: II I! i� DAVID MET'ZGER 1 ii iiFF.ELEV.•56A2' Date: 6-26-DO O E_ Scale: 1/8'- -o• -O• ' `-_----' Drawn by: LA Checked by Job No.: 990904 Drawing No.: P-bldg-sec • O NORTH - SOUTH SECTION BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET 4. 1 A e_p° rf 0CT-18-2000 12 11 TREE CARE UNLIMITED 503 635 1549 P.02/03 to& �y ,�ys 2 er,c3 - ©c'et. IC U4lirnitea October 18, 2000 City of Tigard Voice: 503-639-4171 x349 Attn: Karen Fox FAX: 503-684-7297 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Karen Fox: RE: Arborist Report, dated September 27, 2000, for OPUS Northwest, Southwest Center, SW Durham Road, Tigard OR After receiving a call from David Metzger at the request of Karen Fox, I met with David at the site to review the excavation near his Giant Sequoias. As in the first instance, the work had been completed when I was called to review the situation. The recent excavation and retaining wall construction has further impacted several Giant Sequoia root systems, We had been told they were done excavating near the Sequoias the last visit! I was unable to determine root damage as the backfill had been completed. However, the close impact to these trees indicates a concern is warranted. Tree losses may become a reality in the next 2-3 years, but it is difficult to determine since they are a hardy specie and root loss was not identifiable'. David Metzger indicated the contractor he talked with assured him Teufel's Landscape had an Arborist on site. My visit occurred Wednesday, October 4, 2000. Residential and Commercial Spraying • Fertilizing • Pruning• Landscape Installation •Landscape Maintenance• Consultation MEMBER: National Arborist Association • International Society of Arboriculture •Oregon Association of Nurserymen Oregon Golf Course Superintendents'Association • Oregon Landscape Contractors Association State Licensed Tree Service#62635• Landscape Contractor#5659 • Chemical Application #000231 • Insured P.O. Box 1566 • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • (503) 635-3165 • Vancouver(360) 737-2646 • FAX (503) 635-1549 E-mail: TREECAREL @AOL.COM OCT-18-2800 12: 12 TREE CARE UNLIMITED 5a 635 1549 P.03/03 City of Tigard Page 2 If you have any questions, call me at 503-635-3165. Respectfully, Z;S:2 � Raymond Myer, General Manager Tree Care & Landscapes Unlimited, Inc. Certified Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture, #PN-0160 Oregon Landscape Contractors License #11604 Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, Commercial Pesticide Applicators License #00187 CC: VLMK Engineering Attn: Christine FAX: 503-248-9263 OPUS Northwest Attn: Bruce Woods FAX: 503-916-8964 David Metzger Adjacent Property Owner FAX: 503-625-5310 TOTAL P.03 • • II I1 and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784•Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 September 6, 2000 NEI #: 99-0904 Karen Fox, Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Jackson Business Center Addition Tigard, OR SDR 2000-00016 Dear Ms. Fox: Enclosed please find the additional information requested in your incompleteness letter dated July 28, 2000. Please be aware that Mr. Metzger is no longer able to remove and relocate the existing sequoia trees as originally planned. He is now proposing to remove the existing trees and plant new sequoia trees as noted on the enclosed, revised landscape plan. Also included is a tree plan prepared by a certified arborist. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA/cjb Enclosures TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 1 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard,OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5, 2000 SCOPE OF WORK The assignment is to provide Metzger Construction Compny with a Tree Plan for the proposed construction site at 7190, 7800 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR 97224. See Site Sketch with numbered trees on page 9. This report will include a numbered (1-24) tree inventory of existing trees on the site at the times of inspection. The inventory will include the following information: a. Number of tree corresponding to number on Site Sketch. b. Species c. Diameter at four feet above existing grade d. Condition e. Narrative comments regarding recommended care. BACKGROUND This Tree Plan is based on property lines represented on drawings provided to the arborist. No other information was provided. The field work was by David R. Cory, ISA Certified Arborist WC-1403. The site work was performed August 18 and 28, 2000. SUMMARY The trees at this site are one (1) pin oak, one (1) Douglas-fir, and eighteen (22) Sequoia. They range in size from 7.2-inch diameter at four (4) feet above grade to 27.5- inch diameter. Eleven (11) of the existing trees recently have been transplanted to their present positions, and are designated to remain. Three other existing trees are designated to remain. Ten (10) trees, all Sequoias, are designated to be removed. The proposed removals range in diameter from 20.0 to 27.5 inches. They represent 76 percent of the 13 existing, not recently transplanted, site trees over 12 inches in diameter. Diameters of the trees designated to be removed total 236.5 inches. TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 2 7190, 7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5,2000 DISCUSSION Trees #1-#8, inclusive, and #20-#24, inclusive, are protected at their bases by a rock wall. Tree # 9 has no rock wall. Temporary chain link fencing six (6) feet tall should be installed along the tree line on the west (trees #1-#9) on the construction side, and along the south part of the property where trees #20-#24 stand. There should be no construction activity, storage of materials, etc., on the tree side of this protection fencing unless under the direction and supervision of a consulting arborist experienced in protecting trees on wooded construction sites. City of Tigard. Community Development Code, Title 18.790.030, requires that, if less than 25 percent of 12+-inch trees are being retained, all of those being removed (10) must be mitigated. The combined diameters (236.5 inches) of the trees designated to be removed must be mitigated in accordance with Title 18.790.060D. The ten (10) recently transplanted Sequoias on site have combined diameters totalling 114.6 inches. Quantities and sizes of proposed plantings of trees, taken from the proposed landscape plan, Sheet 1.2, are given in the table below. The 187 inches from the table added to the 114.6 inches combined diameters of the transplanted Sequoias yield a total of 301.6 inches — 65.1 inches in excess of the combined diameters of the trees being removed. Table: Trees to be planted according to Landscape Plan, Sheet 1.2. Common N ame Species Quant. Cal. Tot. Inches Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea 2 4" 8 Pin oak Quercus palustris 1 4" 4 Kousa dogwood Cornus kousa 3 8" 24 Vine maple Acer circinatum 7 8" 56 Royal Red maple Acer platanoides `Royal Red' 6 1.5" 9 Emerald arborvitae Thuja occidentalis `Emerald' 16 3.0" 48 Cherrylaurel Prunus laurocerasus `Otto Luyken' 28 1.0" 28 Mugo pine Pinus mugo mugo 4 1.5" 6 Japanese yew Taxus cuspidata `Nana' 2 2.0" 4 187 4 TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 3 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5, 2000 TREE INVENTORY Tree number: 001 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 7.2 inches. Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along.with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 002 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: `S 11.6 inches. Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather 'r and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of f/ September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 003 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum)Diameter at four feet above grade: 12.5 inches. Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem.This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather - regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be _applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. 4 1 TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 4 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5,2000 Tree number: 004 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 14.3 inches. Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 005 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 9.5 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20- 20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 006 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 11.8 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather - regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20- 20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. a TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 5 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5,2000 Tree number: 007 Species: pin oak (Quercus palustris) Diameter at four feet above grade: 8.4 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Not pruned. Tortuous trunk. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 008 Species: Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesiz) Diameter at four feet above grade: 23.2 inches Comment: Bark wounds to trunk and buttress. Two-inch diameter root torn. Grade at base of tree has been lowered. Broken branches. Add 2-3 inches of bark mulch near base of tree, but not touching the tree, where grade has been lowered, then soak with water. Tree number: 009 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 20.0 inches Comment: Grade at base of tree has been disturbed and is slightly raised. Bark of trunk and buttress is scored and gouged. Sign nailed to the trunk. Tree number: 010 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 24.7 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 011 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 23.2 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 012 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 22.4 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 6 7190, 7800 SW Durham Road, Tigard,OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5, 2000 Tree number: 013 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 20.0 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 014 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 24.5 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 015 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 23.5 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 016 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 24.2 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 017 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 23.5 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 018 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 23.0 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 019 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 27.5 inches Comment: Designated to be removed. Tree number: 020 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 21.0 inches Comment:Condition unremarkable. TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 7 7190,7800 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5, 2000 Tree number: 021 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 13.4 inches Comment: Rubbed bark. Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather - regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20-20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 022 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 11.7 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather- regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20- 20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. Tree number: 023 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 10.7 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather - regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20- 20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. • TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 8 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard,OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5,2000 Tree number: 024 Species: giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) Diameter at four feet above grade: 11.9 inches Comment: Recently transplanted by tree spade. Temporary irrigation is in place and being used. Crown raised. Chainsaw wounds to phloem and occasionally to xylem. This tree should be deep-soak watered three times a week during warm weather and twice a week during cool weather - regardless of rainfall. Until the end of September this tree should be fertilized biweekly with a low acid, completely water soluble 20-20- 20 fertilizer. Mixed in water per the container label the fertilizer can be applied along with root hormones as part of one of the deep soak waterings. Fertilization should begin again in April 2001 and continue through the end of September 2001. TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 9 7190,7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5,2000 SITE SKETCH Not to Scale N T SW Durham Road —_ °Tree #9 C-1 Tree #10 Tree #8 Tree #11a @Tree #7 Tree #12 Tree #6 Tree #13 5n_, -11,4 °Tree #5 Tree #14 Tree #4 Tree#15 ) OTree #3 Tree #16 \-/L- Tree #170 OTree #2 C�''� Tree #18 Tree #1f\„ . Tree #19#19S i f 'A/ Tree #24 Tree #23 Tree #22 Tree #21-Tree ~� TREE PLAN FOR DAVE METZGER Page 10 7190, 7800 SW Durham Road,Tigard, OR 97224 Pruett Tree and Landscape September 5, 2000 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. Any legal description provided to the Pruett,Inc.,Arborist is warranted to be correct.Any titles and ownership information as to any property also is warranted to be accurate. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. The client further warrants that the property/project is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances,statutes,or other government regulations. The Pruett,Inc.,Arborist assumes no responsibility as to any information involving legal information or as to opinions based on incorrect information. 2. The Arborist cannot independently,personally verify all information necessary to provide this report. The Arborist will reasonably attempt to obtain information from reliable sources.All data have been verified insofar as reasonably possible, however, the Arborist can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 3. The Arborist will give testimony related to this report only if separate contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services. 4. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 5. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply a right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed,without the prior written consent of the Arborist.Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof,shall be used for any purpose by anyone but the person to whom it is addressed,without the written consent of the Arborist,nor shall it be conveyed by anyone, including the client,to the public through advertising,public relations, news,sales or other media,without the written consent of the Arborist. 6. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the Arborist and the Arborist's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result,the occurrence of a subsequent event,nor upon any finding to be reported. 7. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, are for explanatory purposes,are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys, and should not be relied upon except as an aid to understanding this report. 8. Unless expressed otherwise: (a) information contained in this report covers only those items requested to be observed and reflect the condition of those items at the time of observation; and (b) the Arborist's observations are limited to visual examination of accessible components without dissection,excavation,or probing. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied,that problems or deficiencies involving the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. 9. Client hereby waives and releases Arborist and Pruett Incorporated,its agents, directors, officers, employees, representatives,successors and assigns and insurers of and from all damages, claims,actions,suits and liability of any nature whatsoever, known and unknown, now existing or arising after the date of this report and related or pertaining to (1) the information in this report, (11) information not contained in this report,and/or(111) any other act or omissions of Arborist with respect to the subject matter of this report. r , ) I W IN..,.,..7131..., \.Il...i.11ll.11 TREE SCHEDULE ..11, 1i•11 OTT •17.L1 .OTA JL TOM an •.ac.e N. and C•n.Wctl .S.rvka Inc. 1 �Q\l'lj_ yabl� fr. Di NS 0.90 MO I • Ir'04. no 8w.DURHAM ROAD D . m YItlC -���� Fa (04 184-X1 R "- Mel 910+ Mel • • ' ` l••••••0114.0.1 MY A•N07110 , �..:. r+rrrrl.w���� + rN max,- na "PP' mss:L 7777 . . OM, E; , :o ManuO.'wM a•WnY1 Y Nano 'T emu! 0 �/ .lie+ ` 1iy1 -al J%. 7i�^. logy ��' ■�• �Ni� .M COMPACT 02•04.2 IDTM 11 :�® aW.RNl.1M ■ •uti C....•WON iM Y � wwI�\`\ __ II I ' O v. Y.Hay u.c.oae 1 :;�; • \ 1 :'lULL Room t Y• Y.W. # �i •.r�Y :_\1,iZJ 91 i _ • A•TOM .a.:� '■��r•11.••∎•∎PAYIA 7'd.6a3•_+\IIMMMMMMMEMO.\.7" TERM DATED ea.c..xw - 8 LO...oM.T:..r s •a.�CAM.••r oc 1 �l\?ji( ouc 1 _pi ® .•RNr MOO ro wlm. • 1 LMT (•4•12 L. a• owl -•'-1 Qi., • r •x.o. . • mne.n.aNUa ...T a. .aw�w YwaN "i�im" • \C1��Il -, A flOi ■ ® MION.T. T AcrA �!!! JACKSON • • aw MERLE aa.-u.* Y.a. .11!)•••• ,' /4I%-., BUSINESS • • •w :R• : 2EAL.CAM A.•ECM 1/: .1 CENTER s ® •••,,,,.,•••••••, •.w. Y.... :::t�I: `Q1�11/rI .. 7190.7800 SW.DURHAM RD. • _ Raxo410ww MM a.Ra WIRE: _ TI 97227 • • RNaoaa41oRa. 77-. ••••••• R.; 11: i;•ice s`�,�-\-irun• \ wax rlOrLORA NAM . DAVID LETZGER }00.7.41 THE TIM IMO REM RELOCATED 1 �llI ;! 1L `\\}�/ v OCOMM TRW rora MOWED *I 1� Days TRr TO R•lw •.1•f.: . ..:.w:T••�84411P��I Dale 1..20'0 •MOM.TRIM TO-PIMMED �',0. :d�i.til=�16' I Seale 1,i/ ^1 C1Y� I • `ra• nM°'° Dra.•by DJ. LANDSCAPE NOTES %Iite,�.' a°w %ii\�- bp 1°0°DU i.4.1.uior MEM MALL r n.o•0 VP All wuanwl %al:: ' a( dwM Na: P�ARD� 7W TI.mnw.craYOU moor....a.TKy o..•707..Art .24•Z: POLE a 741ao POT rrwV.a.w.o.REO }T;.j: ��� `�\��V//4�• •ALL MARTI MALL 07MOR710 ALL A.nr.••.•TyoANO.o �k DTI/4 Y.. 110 LAMM ow.or no ve•R000m•TIMAPO POR NM.,now II 1111 11 Uw AM.UMW w.r�rr.NO MC.FRO.'°.ica4 i<•LOI AT PLNa•41 Mm. ./' \ ' 'TARIP 1/%11.4 .1.W.\ \..Vi �INIIWOri •`W9- .ITEM a ONMEa':•CLZ••a..R'�ONT.O MT 0021 w.RAMMED, .61 hIAN .,.,. 11, ibty '�Alv `i,ck■ 0, 1:9,''''''..r/lil\N ,irt� .ME raalo.IW'.•TIM YO..MACE N n.r/MM. + s r •L L:y M:.wro.a rwar.cr,d 4•01.0.AT AU 001110 s na.d A. TO N-AM WW1 AT oMw a w6.M r AWED. L/OCAPE PLAN •MIMI MrT ♦ MM.TO i.e Nat TLNrAI�d.o NO�}1 APE PLAN i t ip 112M I M W� .1 M.I�WTW 1/`/'.IIIr1 i P.M. 1 .2 • I■■ ■■■■■■ I.,i iI raft' El l■ slump jaawita. . ..a..■■■..■.■ ■ I►�rl h' . E�1 ►grey■ mamma and Construction Services Inc. PO Box 23784 9025 S.W_ Center Street Tigard, Oregon 97281 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: 07/24/2000 City of Tigard TO: Karen Fox FROM: Heather Baldwin Office Manager FAX: 503- 684-7297 FAX: 503-684-3636 TEL: 503-639-4171 TEL: 503-620-2086 CC: PAGES: 3 COMMENTS: Karen, Following is a copy of the existing landscape plan and the proposed one. Heather Td Wd8 T :T T 000E P 'I nt 9292 P89 20S : 'ON Y,dd 99N I e10AN I 9N3 I 100I N : WO& UAL • If 4.4 . CaQ , I. all 5P a • a ' as oaaaaoaaa000aao�oer ` 9 I ii ji aR ii Hi iii mom op.1. o ma0Orr: ,= .0 El =,,, - . ' 1' I ii ill ° 11 , y.41 11 IA iti I" q .11 II : ,: t: ;.,,%, i [imr , fin t 1 ii; IF 11 11 p : f, ': r : VII ' 46% . tr & 1 '1" 1 r 01 I! 1111111111111i oenHo 8811118onuon . 1 il 1 1 A 11 ir I . ..,„.,,,,,_ ..„„,,, s.„,,...„ ,„,(,,,,„, OVII, ,A• .1, 11 C 15 !!!f !!! ♦ 1.`11,., !'r1,::r�a;A•. • J a ! r 7 i m s r ' ,: a-w •L� .:!1I*m_ w.• rr. i as ∎ W -< Er .o I �' a' 111 ��•` � is I Di; d .■ , �,,.. • :cam / \,v/ I. 1 ` 5'!I 11ri I ;f F.iANNNNN4�,3-4 1✓f� L a� 2 e''-_J lrrr i:,. 7,?, � I�\ �t --lit I, , wf • I` ,,a • '� �a:: p�MIM�IM11/11 t1/llglt iIrr � $1 II ia` 111 ! 1 • BE!" a g it' i A f,11 1::if t� 111 igg Ef gY r •�f•_� .._..._... Ili P a 1 I:5111 l M—g Ed WHET :T S 000E PE 'I of 9292 P89 20S : 'ON XZ d ON I N22N I 9N2 I 1OO I N : W0e1H Ei� a9 ,va:., �b2s ,yvivi mu lying.* j ]. 11 P 8 11 K hi i a • ® • • ® O ® m • ® O ® • Qm 6g > - * -_ - = /i �4 S � 14 J �Si �� � afi �/,!' Sirli�• .q�'t'i} t +d6N�'+6gror V il i it g t't c I 1 1 t 'd t % l H e r 1 id il ii ? Ipil i. iai la -,1 1 i #� c� ia g I' H � sx F ; ;� ; ; ; : F € \ i 1t4 itX 4 ! Q ; i t t t t i t t t t C t t t C t t i i i t t t t t t t I i 'X$ i i'c I F - i . .1 !I -.. I `4491°- u I), Upl �\ fi/:: -'111 :.111% '+.g„ fill k�,w-.lINV",,,:i1tl.%`1frre 4:111211 6i✓ilikv••0121: ;volt J..e�t,* . —��� a ,r 'Nuur 1 • 6119}irwr;i••■ 111 • 41} ,1 . c: S.W.797f AVE Ipil 3 ta Ril 144 t! Vt 1/ 41 N1ti [[[777 4 .,VI .c 1 III ff 11' aaaVI, ��%i (I�(Ir . �i r"q 1 I 33 d1\._a lit\� __ IdU __�,/U\ ___ /6{N :I:::ll i 1II{I\� ..ail{� /..-" _�. . .• \�1i. ■ in ,. i i t eq /lS\�� �iC �IMIMIhIIMlllllll/11111 •.: 1 _-_tiro: . 7g h % a 2 i a �I � NIII El jG and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 July 19, 2000 NEI#: 99-0904 City of Tigard ATTN: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Manager 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Tree Relocation for David Metzger's Jackson Business Center, Building Addition 7190 & 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Bewersdorff: We have submitted for Site Development Review for the project noted above. An issue has developed which we would like to discuss with you. There are a series of Sequoia trees on the site which is to receive the proposed building addition. The owner was originally going to have these trees cut down due to the high cost of having the trees moved. Recently, the owner found a company willing to relocate the trees at a reduced price if the job could be done August 1St. Our submittal plans show the existing and proposed location of the trees. The proposed location will continue the perimeter tree planting found on the adjacent development. The problem occurs in scheduling the tree move and the timeline of the Site Development Review process. When I spoke with Associate Planner, Karen Fox, I was informed that the SDR would have to be completed before the trees could be reviewed and approved for a move. It is my understanding that the SDR will not be complete for several more months, which will not allow for an approval of the tree move before August 1st. We understand that in most situations the Site Development Review must be finalized before considering the move of the trees in order to maintain compliance with the development code. We are, however, asking that an exception be made in our case. The owner is willing to incur the cost ($26,000, $13,000 of which is a non- refundable deposit) of moving the trees in order to produce a better project and save the existing trees. We feel we have a unique situation and opportunity • ./ which requires the typical sequence of events to be modified in order to create a win-win situation for the City of Tigard and the Owner. I understand that you are out of the office until July 24, 2000 at which time I will be on vacation, which has led me to send this letter instead of speaking with you personally. I have asked the owner, Mr. David Metzger to contact you regarding this issue. Sincerely, James D. Andrews Project Manager JDA/cjb cc: Karen Fox, Associate Planner Jim Hendryx, Director of Community Development G ,o'Tc k 2\eprf Technical Data for STORMTREATTM SYSTEMS, INC. STORMTREATTh' SYS l EMS, INC. Sextant Hill, Unit 1 90 Route 6A Sandwich, MA 02563 Telephone: 508-833-1033 Facsimile: 508-833-3150 FACT SHEET-ATTENUATION OF POLLUTANTS WITHIN THE STORMTREATTM SYSTEM The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM,INC. (STS) combines well documented methods of pollutant attenuation within both the sedimentation basin and constructed wetland. A brief description of each of these processes follows. 1.0 SEDIMENTATION BASIN The majority.of stormwater contaminants are associated with particulates which are carried as suspended solids with runoff. Extensive literature has demonstrated that pollutants such as phosphorus,metals and organic compounds are adsorbed to sediment particles (Harper et al. 1986, ABAG 1986, Hickok et al. 1977). Gersberg et al. (1984) determined that 97%of zinc and 99% of copper and cadmium were found to be adsorbed to sediment particles. Adsorption occurs through three processes: 1) electrostatic attractions,2) physical attractions (e.g. Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding) and 3) chemical reactions. The concentrations of suspended solids in stormwater occur over a broad range and are very dependent upon local watershed conditions. A study of six highway runoff sites throughout the United States reported a range in suspended solids of 4-1156 mg/L with a mean concentration of 261 mg/L (Smith and Lord, 1990). Median concentrations for suspended solids in stormwater runoff from various land uses are presented in Table 1 below. Table 1 Median Concentrations of Suspended Solids by Land Use Residential 101. mg/L Mixed 67 mg/L Commercial 69 mg/L One of the principal mechanisms for removing suspended solids within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is settling within the sedimentation basin. The efficiency of this process is largely dependent upon particle sizes of suspended solids and their associated settling velocities. The distribution of particle sizes found in highway runoff was determined by wet sieve analysis and is presented below in Table 2 (Rexnord,Inc. 1984). Approximate settling velocities of various particle sizes are presented in Table 3 (U.S. Department of Agriculture 1981). STORMTREAT''SYSTEMS,INC. Page 1 Table 2 Wet Sieve Analysis of Highway Runoff Composite Samples Particle Size (µm) % of Suspended Solids >250 6.45 88-250 6.02 44-88 9.08 <44 78.45 Table 3 Approximate Settling Velocities for Sediment Particles mm p.m type of particle settling velocity 0.5-1 500-1000 coarse sand 15-20 ft/rain. 0.25-0.5 250-500 medium sand 2-10 ft/min. 0.08-0.1 80-100 fine sand 30-80 ft/hr. 0.002-0.05 2-50 silt 1-2 ft/hr. <0.002 <2 clay 0.005-0.01 ft./day Source: U.S.Department of Agriculture, 1981 The amount of time for this settling of particles to occur is determined by the retention time of stormwater within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM. Two retention times are applicable: Phase 1 - that which occurs within the sedimentation basin as the tank fills (and begins discharge to the surrounding wetland) and Phase 2 - that which occurs after the basin is filled. Phase 1 - The average intensity storm for the Northeastern United States is 0.05 inches/hour (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1986). At this rate,one-half inch of runoff(300 cubic feet per STS tank) will be collected over a period of 10 hours. This represents an average inflow rate of 0.5 cubic feet/minute (3.74 gallons/minute) and an average retention time of 320 minutes (5.3 hours). Phase 2 - The average holding time within the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is 5-10 days. This is determined by the permeability of the wetland substrate and the outlet control valve. According to this information, the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM sedimentation basin will be effective in attenuating a significant portion of the suspended solids. The average retention time of 5.3 hours during Phase 1 (the tank filling) will allow for the settling of silt, sand and gravel-sized particles. This is consistent with the findings of Randall et al. (1982)which indicate that settling times as short as 2 hours are adequate to remove 55-85% of fine suspended sediment (sizes 15-35 microns). STORMTREATTM`SYSTEMS,INC. Page 2 Additional settling of fine particles will occur during Phase 2, the 5-10 days following the storm event, when the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM filters the water through the wetland substrate. Many of these finer particles are believed to be organic in nature. Randall et al. (1982) also indicated that 6-35% of the organic matter is contained in the 15-35 micron size range particles. The remaining 65- 94% organic matter is therefore assumed to be associated with very fine particles which will migrate into the STS wetland system. A series of six bulkhead walls within the central sedimentation chambers function as filters by employing synthetic screening and woven geotextile filters between each of the sedimentation chambers. These filtration bulkheads enhance the.sedimentation of the silt, sand and gravel size particles within the sedimentation chamber. The last chamber in the sedimentation basin is constructed with inverted elbows to function as an oil and grease trap. 2.0 CONSTRUCTED WETLAND The STS constructed wetland is unique in that all of the discharge into the wetland occurs subsurface. This subjects all of the stormwater to treatment within the wetland soils and root zone where the most efficient attenuation of pollutants occurs. This pollutant attenuation occurs by a variety of processes including filtration,adsorption and biochemical reactions. 2.1 Filtration The very fine particles (including bacterial cells) which pass through the final sedimentation chamber enter into and are filtered within the wetland substrate. A recently completed study of septic systems for the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation indicates that bacteria (and other similarly-sized organic particles) are filtered within a distance of 10 feet of leaching fields placed in sand (Ayers &Associates, 1993). In that the STS wetland system is 25 feet in length, the removal of bacteria is very efficient. 2.2 Oxidation The Ayers study also summarizes several other researchers efforts regarding the fate of organic particulates within sandy soils receiving septic effluent. This research suggests that one of the most effective methods for decomposition of these organic deposits within the sand filtration medium is dosing (or alternating) of septic leach fields providing for the periodic aeration of soils and the oxidation of organics within the soil. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM provides a similar environment through the fluctuating water levels within the wetland soils. As the system empties following a storm event, air is drawn down into the soil column by the declining water table. In this manner the soils are STORMTREATT'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 3 aerated providing an optimal environment for the decomposition of organic particulates within the soils. 2.3 Adsorption Those pollutants which occur in a dissolved state will pass through the sedimentation basin and into the constructed wetland. Adsorption of these pollutants onto the surfaces of the soil particles within the wetland system is a principal mechanism for the removal of pollutants. The literature suggests that pollutants such as phosphorus, dissolved metals and organic colloidal pollutants (Harper et a1. 1986;ABAG 1986; Hickok et al. 1977). Adsorption occurs through three main processes: 1) electrostatic attractions, 2) physical attractions (e.g. Van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding);and 3) chemical reactions. In an experimental constructed wetland, Gersberg et al. (1984) showed that 97% of the added zinc and 99% of the added copper and cadmium were removed. 2.4 Precipitation Precipitation of metals and phosphorus within the wetland soil matrix is another mechanism for attenuation within the constructed wetland. Metals such as cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc form insoluble sulfides under reduced conditions commonly found in wetland soils (Benforado, 1981). Fulvic and humic acids released by decaying organic matter can form complexes with metal ions. Phosphorus precipitates as a ferric complex under oxidizing conditions. 2.5 Biochemical Reactions within the Constructed Wetland Constructed wetlands have shown promising results with regard to the treatment of stormwater pollution. The majority of the biochemical reactions which serve to attenuate pollutants occur within the subsurface (root zone) of the wetland. Most notably, the process of denitrification is accomplished by bacteria associated with the plant roots under anaerobic conditions. Such conditions occur as partially-treated stormwater flows through the wetland soils and the biochemical oxygen demand consumes available dissolved oxygen. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is unique in that all of the stormwater flows into the subsurface of the wetland. Commonly the opposite is true (surface inflows) for more conventional constructed wetlands. STORMTREATn'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 4 3.0 REFERENCES Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 1979. Treatment of Stormwater Runoff by a Marsh/Flood Basin. Interim Report. Benforado,J. 1981 Ecological Considerations in Wetland Treatment of Wastewater. In Selected Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management,June 17-19, 1981. Edited by B. Richardson. pp.307- 323. St. Paul, Minnesota. Gersberg, R.M., S.R. Lyon, B.Y. Elkins, and C.R. Goldman. 1984. The Removal of Heavy Metals by Artificial Wetlands. EPA-600/D-84-258. Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Office of Research and Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,Ada,Oklahoma. Harper, H.H., M.P. Wanielista, B.M. Fries, and D.M. Baker. 1986. Stormwater Treatment by Natural Systems. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Report 84-026. Hickok, E.A., M.C. Hannaman, and N.C. Weck. 1977. Urban Runoff Treatment Methods. Volume 1 - Non-Structural Wetland Treatment. EPA-600/2-77-217. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District,Wayzata, Minnesota. Rexnord, Inc. 1984. "Source and Migration of Highway Runoff Pollutants",Vol. 3, Research Report prepared for the FHWA,FHWA/RD-84/059,NTIS PB86- 227915. Smith, D.L. and Lord, B.N. 1990. "Highway Water Quality Control - Summary of 15 Years of Research", Transportation Research Record,No. 1279, Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1981. "Soil Survey of Porter County, Indiana", USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. "Methodology for Analysis of Detention Basins for Control of Urban Runoff Quality", EPA 440/S-87-001,U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. STORMTREATTM`SYSTEMS,INC. Page 5 FACT SHEET- HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVELS In some areas where the STS is utilized, high groundwater may occur. High groundwater refers to shallow depths to the water table (or the top of the saturated zone). These conditions commonly occur during the spring months after a long period of winter precipitation during which evaporation and transpiration by plants (collectively known 'as evapotranspiration) is minimal. High groundwater level conditions commonly result in the failure of leaching systems (for both stormwater and septic disposal)by inundating the leaching facilities and causing these systems to hydraulically fail. In wetlands (or hydric soils) the water table may be at or very near to the lands surface for extended periods of the year. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM effectively handles high groundwater conditions. First it is designed to withstand the hydrostatic pressures created by saturated soils surrounding the tanks. This is largely due to its internal bulkheads which provide dual function as filtration walls and as structural. members which distribute external stresses throughout the structure. Because STS is not dependent upon an external leaching facility its effluent can be piped to a remote downgradient discharge area. Alternatively, in areas where the high groundwater conditions are likely to be short term (days), the STS holding time of 5-10 days will accommodate the storage and treatment of stormwater during the period following the precipitation event while high groundwater levels subside. A special case of high groundwater may exist in coastal areas where groundwater levels are influenced by tidal fluctuations. In most cases this is limited to distances of tens of feet from the shoreline, up to approximately 100 feet in unique instances. In these cases STS employs a check valve which allows discharge only during mid to low tide conditions. The effluent flow valve is adjusted to allow higher than normal flow velocities during mid to low tide conditions to maintain an overall average holding time of 5-10 days. • STORMTREAT'SYSTEMS,INC. Page 6 i POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMPs Fecal TSS TP TN COD Pb Zn Coliform Infiltration Basin 75 65 60 65 65 65 Infiltration Trench 75 60 55 65 65 65 Vegetated Buffer Strip 65 40 40 40 45 60 Grass Swale 60 20 10 25 70 60 Sand Filter 80 50 35 55 60 65 Water Quality Inlet 35 5 20 5 15 5 Oil Grit Separator 15 5 5 5 15 5 Extended Detention Dry Pond 45 25 30 20 50 20 Wet Pond 60 45 35 40 75 60 Extended Detention Wet Pond 80 65 55 40 20 Constructed Wetland 65 25 20 50 65 35 STORMTREATTM SYSTEMS,INC. 99 89 65 82 , 77, '90 , ;;94 Source: U.S.EPA,January 1993 Report 840-B-92-002 and Parsons Engineering,June 1996, Watershed 96 Proceedings. s• �. PRODUCT FACT SHEET: STORMTREAT'SYSTEM • 1 44 1 i ii -:\ ' 1\ 1 1 \ \ • it .r 1 AIM .I Slotted PVC pipe t ■ � �q"��'i `II All Infiltration ` c`��11_ :41 1�1 ∎J discharge pipe w. . h Nom) Constructed f s `� wetland r�Inflow from n �catch basin ,...nR Grit-filter bag .=> iimill.....0.3-011-em _,...1, .G"---Aip ■...111PV <— •0 Val ‘ ,% (.74' i0 Outlet control valve `------- -- - Skimmers Slotted PVC pipe Inverted elbow Narrative Description lr The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM, INC. is a stormwater treatment technology which provides high levels of treatment for a broad range of pollutants. It also saves space by reducing the need for unsightly detention basins. The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM captures and treats the first flush of runoff which contains 90% of pollutants. An optional infiltration feature provides for the treatment of larger quantities of stormwater (beyond the first flush). The system consists of a series of six sedimentation chambers and a constructed wetland which are contained within a modular 9.5-foot diameter tank. It is constructed of recycled polyethylene which connects directly to existing drainage structures. Influent is piped into the sedimentation chambers where larger-diameter solids are removed. The internal sedimentation chambers contain a series of skimmers which selectively decant the upper portions of the stormwater in the sedimentation basins, leaving behind the more turbid lower waters. The skimmers significantly increase the separation of solids compared with conventional settling/detention basins. An inverted elbow trap serves to collect floatables such as oils within the inner tank. After moving through the internal chambers, the partially treated stormwater passes into the surrounding constructed wetland through a series of slotted PVC pipes. The wetland is comprised of a gravel substrate planted with bulrushes and other wetland plants. Unlike most wetlands constructed for stormwater treatment, STORMTREATTM conveys stormwater into the subsurface of the wetland and through the root zone, where greater pollutant attenuation occurs through such processes as filtration, adsorption, and biochemical reactions. Precipitation of metals and phosphorus occurs within the wetland substrate while biochemical reactions, including microbial decomposition,provide treatment of the stormwater prior to discharge through the outlet valve. An outlet control valve provides a 5-day holding time within the system. The valve can be closed to contain a hazardous waste spill. As an optional feature, when the water levels in the wetland reach a depth of three feet, it overtops an internal weir which directs the treated water into the surrounding fill and soils. In this manner,the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is capable of processing stormwater beyond the first flush. Specifications 111 The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is sized and configured based upon the water quality design storm, the area of impervious surfaces and the available storage volume of preliminary detention. Generally 1 - 2 units per acre of impervious surface are required to meet standards. Treatment occurs off-line with a by-pass to accomodate the latter portions of storm events (which contain less pollutants). • STORMTREAT'M Specifications Diameter 9 1/2 ft Height 4 ft Storage Capacity 1390 gal Inflow Pipe Diameter 4 in Outflow Pipe Diameter 2 in Average Detention Time 5 days Average Discharge Rate 0.25 gal/min Units Required per Acre of Impervious Surface 1-2 2 r , . Site Constraints/Installation Requirements STORMTREAT'STM size and modular configuration make it adaptable to a wide range of site constraints and watershed sizes. It can be installed in any type of soil as the discharge rate is very low (1 - 2 gal/min) and the gravel filter/wetland substrate is contained within the system. As the flow through the system is gravity dependent, the system requires an elevation change from the pavement surface to a discharge point of at least 4 feet. Applications STORMTREATT"' SYSTEMS have been installed in a variety of applications, including commercial parking lots, industrial sites, town landings and marinas, transportation facilities and residential subdivisions. It is an appropriate treatment technology for•both coastal and inland areas, and can be used throughout the country with only minor system modifications to fit local conditions. Pretreatment Required? The manufacturer recommends that a catch basin be placed prior to the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM in order to trap larger diameter sediments. Other detention facilities such as underground tanks, pipes and open surface basins can also be utilized to store the first flush upstream of the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM units. Where flood control facilities are required, the forebay area can be utilized as this preliminary detention facility. • Performance To date, 315 analyses have been conducted on 33 samples which have been collected over eight independent storm events during both (New England) winter and summer conditions. Influent stormwater samples were taken at the entry point to the STORMTREATT" tanks at the catch basin. Effluent samples were taken during the five days following the storm event. The quality of the sampled effluent was then compared with influent and removal rates were computed. Test results are summarized in the table below. The system performance has been verified by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Strategic Environmental Partnership (STEP) Program. See our website for a full copy of the STEP report. 3 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING RESULTS-STORMTREATTm SYSTEM KINGSTON,MA Average Average Stormwater Treated Percentage Pollutant Influent Discharge Removed (%) Fecal coliform (no1100 ml) 690 20 97 Total suspended solids (mg/1) . 93 1.3 99 Chemical oxygen demand (mg/1) 95 17 82 Total dissolved N (1.1g/1) 3569 520 77 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg/1) 3.4 0.34 90 Lead (µg/1) • 6.5 1.5 77 Chromium (1.1g/1) 60 1 98 Phosphorus (µg/1) 300 26.5 90 Zinc (µg/1) 590 58 90 Note: Samples were collected by the Jones River Watershed Association in accordance with EPA sampling protocol and analyses were performed at state-certified laboratories. Maintenance The STORMTREATTM SYSTEM requires minimal maintenance. Annual inspection is recommended to ensure that the system is operating effectively. At that time the manhole is opened and the burlap grit screening bag covering the influent line should be removed and replaced;filters should be removed, cleaned, and reinstalled. Sediment should be removed from the system via suction pump once very 3-5 years, depending on local soil characteristics and catch basin maintenance practices. Longevity The life expectancy of the STORMTREATTM SYSTEM is 20+years. The polyethylene is treated with a UV-resistant pigment. !Secondary Beneficial or Negative Impacts In addition to treating chronic stormwater discharges, STORMTREATTM functions as a spill containment device by shutting down the outlet control valve following a spill. 4 • Costs ly The price per tank for the STORMTREAT' SYSTEM is $5,500 (quantity • discount available). Additional materials required include gravel,PVC piping, and wetland plants at an average cost of$350-400/tank. Installation costs vary from $100-500/tank for new construction and $500-1500/tank for retrofits. Average costs per acre of contributing impervious drainage area are$7000- 15,000. Delivery Time STORMTREATTm tanks can be delivered within 30 days. Installations Over one hundred (100) tanks have been installed at the following locations: • Residential Road,Jones River, Kingston, MA • Shellfishing Area,Gloucester,MA • Sewage Treatment Plant,Greenfield, MA • GTE Laboratories,Waltham,MA • McDonalds,Hartford,CT • Clakamis County, OR • U.S. Navy,San Diego, CA • Mill Pond,Barnstable,MA • Rite-Aid Pharmacy,Augusta,ME • Elderly Housing Development, Auburn, MA • Crystal Lake, Manchester, NH • Residential Road,Rowley, MA • New England Sealcoating, Hingham, MA ' • Town Park, Ipswich, MA • Rite Aid,Manchester,Maine • Charlotte, North Carolina • Santa Monica Pier,Santa Monica, CA Additional Information I� Engineering design drawings (CAD) can be downloaded from our website. U.S. Patent Number 5,549,817. Manufacturer 5 Address: STORMTREAT"y' SYSTEM,INC. 90 Route 6A Sextant Hill Unit 1 Sandwich,MA 02563 Telephone: (508) 833-1033 Fax: (508)833-3150 Contacts: Scott Horsley Mark Nelson Website Address www.stormtreat.corn 6 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES M( t: ON Community(Deve&apment (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) shapes),BetterCommuttity NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: '' (I 1 100 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: Rf E B� APPLICANT: 1\1iCOli n91.neerirn (4 014/141A:[WO AGENT: JI+M AA SAL Phone:(506) (D90 dO$(n Hetz3cr� Phone: (o ) (,20 -io8cv PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: 11. 1D $w Cucharm Cet UR- aZ2.Z� TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): a S 1 a 13A ►.L . a-OO 0-La 3ot2 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S't S>✓ JP u-e i o (2-Q. (ttayv) Ntod , Cc - , Van c a-,A-c.e., -tom SicQ.e 3c�•ck 'k b&ciK --Ty p -It 0 cidi,Y.47r4--a) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Ibt •oO -s-C, Qdd1- -t - to e><i5.ltrc) /Loane. (novt mavvv-fc_c-LLAt S igtA0 dtv'5 (911 Dovsf�. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: -txt.mkeet-r,frak Z. r' ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: - P C.I.T. AREA: Svn�-- FACILITATOR: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS tAtn tvw MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft.. �� lot width: 50 ft. Maximum building height: 'S ft. Setbacks: Front 3-- ft. Side°/5i. ft Rear oKo 9t. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 15- % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: aS %. (Refer to Code Section 18. 5r l ��: re�i t ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS S°t s t 't rn C,1-41 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 NON-ksidential Applicuion/Plannnt Division Section SPECIAL SETBACKS D STREETS: feet from the centerline of • D LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. D FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. (Refer to Code Chapter 18330) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR)of 1.5 to 1 will exist; D All actual building setbacks will be at least half('/)of the building's height; and D The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. (Refer to Code Section 18.130.010.BJ UJGA- (n.frt.v2e': f t boo 54t. rvtth- ma,vou. PARKING AND ACCESS ebo.,00"r.c t Li91 ,try c& I bob - 5 min – no wt: REQUIRED parking for this type of use: C Fi cv Use '• a 77/I to s-- • - 3.4 hfboo rxe.oun4- Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): Ion � Q --b+61 81 a .4 Id t w a e ucuLz-.1/4.sl- 3.5C /l be)C.) ,e_jcCec �►5 v!�t `9. SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: use 0.Z ti • pt'" -3 / P e Parkiing SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 4/jo _a-ea/S %/ 3Pe pat /0 L / /-/1-0, w'kn spa- _ NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED j AS COMPACT SPACES. teeari ewe/ PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: nu•�� he_ D Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. Vain ez eij D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. a// /tom Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that (44 /914-4-1-"SA separates the parking space from an adjoining space. �7QC��e Cyr ea-4� Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a w es op or urb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as Sjxc landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) f4R2i ate ci Handicapped Parking: /�icyc� f //ooh bl C77 git k1=-4A ¢<< D All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. D BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. 4 — SD tibf &LkbS b - j Minimum number of accesses: or 3� �"' minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18.105) APp1(c t} (ngyc f10 I L:aU44 -ern b�1L /Uptl .4ir/iCCU,.. i 5�cu� 1`LC il> Hof'�c, �•F Ctf�ice.. �� a,cv .� 7L 011 OF TIGARD Pre-Appliation Conference Notes / 4.„ (�� Yx i� f�n J. Page 2 of 9 NON-An dential Application/Planning Nyman Seaton T3��r`/dip?'5 `emu� d`��!•�`h/`� WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.705.0301 LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 02 loac�/� S�ace� (M�r,,riu,� a.� re ua)uei , i/cln s .c/ [Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) - '2 coo o h�� J . f-! ,'4 "r Gc/ I d 3// A) s� -1� avf /� .►t v /o�c� S CLEAR VISION AREA -sp`tic-e.� to f ` - The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: - feet along north boundary. --e` feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. skr„di,.a b ( feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: 10e-9i baud (_ LANDSCAPING \�-(� STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON Residential Application/Planning°moon Section SIGNS SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7801 SENSITIfE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH-ARE 'OTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN 100-Y A•R FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRA�}NAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON S ''ES IN EXCES' OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to • eliminary identify sen•'tive lands areas at the pre- applica'Iikn conference based on available it ormation. HOWEVER, t' e res.onsibilit to .recisel identify s nsitive land areas. and their b. ndaries. is the responsibili of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive Ian. must be clearly indicated on .tans submitted with the developmen pplication. Chapter 18.84 o provides re ul .ons for the use, protection, or modifica.'on of sensitive lands areas. RESIDEN �L DEVELO ENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAI S. (Refer to Code Chat .7151 STEEP SLOPES When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY(USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R&0 96-44 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria. The VEGETATE CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured horizontally, from the defined bo daries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been granted by the Agency or City to redu the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the wid of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an are of the vegetated corridor that is a minimum of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroach ent shall be 15 feet, except as allowed in Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of vegetated corridor within the development or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In an case, the average width of the vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: , NO structures, development, construction .ctivities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or othe .ctivities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the v-:etated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OI3'6IKE PATH, NOT E'&EEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, then the vegetated cbcridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not`b,e constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of The sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall beyonstructed so as to minimize disturbance�t existing vegetation; and WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated rridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. (Refer to R&0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON Residential Appliation/Plimmnc D,is,on kwon • WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER SOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive an and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wet ds, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear an objective standards to: protect significant wetlands .nd streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water q : ity; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion- aintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; nd conserve scenic, recreational and edu'ational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT AL MEETS THE REQUIREME■• S OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of e Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions quire that "significan " wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin R ver, which is also "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING TI AMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 c .'c feet per second (cfs). ➢ Major streams in Tigard include FAN * C' .EK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CRE KS) AND ALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARIN9 STREAMS" accord' • to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Pell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin Rive . Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIAT• P WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor bou•dary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). • The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, •less modified in accordance with}his chapter. The MAJOR §TREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in -ccordance with this cha ter. • ISOLATE WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian tback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agenc (USA) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.797.0301 Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetatio?ri preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbe reas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the ,Vegetati Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstrates all of the following: ➢ Native plant species currently,cover less than 80 0f,the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ The tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of t e,QQn-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setb ck area for the last five years; That vegetation was notJemoved contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant.tpecies; CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON•R,,d,,i i Opplan on/Pl4nnmg Dnuian k<non ➢ That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and ➢ The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.797.100] TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A TREE PAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing tregislucluding trees designated as significant by the City; atd Icc l oca±ea . OO ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.] MITIGATION REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Ae∎dennil Appi ion/Phoning Dmuon Seaton NARRATIVE The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 CODE CHAPTERS 1 8.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirement) 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Unit) / (Temporary Use Permit) V-- 18.370(Variances/Adjustment) 18.715(Density Computations) / 18.790 (Tree Removal) 18.380(loving Map/Text Amendments) / 18.770(Design Compatibility Standards) J 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) si 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 18.798 fireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(Lot line Adjustment V) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 1 8.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) / 1 8.742(Home Occupation Permit) 18.430(Subdivisions) \/ 18.745(landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning District) / 1 8.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ✓ 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Reryding Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) IMPACT STUDY As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAN USE APPLICATION with •- of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdi . ion plat naming reque with the : hington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approV I/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until thb City receives.-the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the'Subdivision Name Reservation---- [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Resdentiaf Apphution/Plennmg Dotson Section BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). RECYCLING Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. [Refer to Code Chapter 183551 140 Qbia(A/K' Oa, ,1-.'t ✓ • .2000. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Pf a e%yam a, \( lo icw.cltsca.pt en ovv whocL 4:6e4 n+ meek fAi nmu), ,r ,ra zc►oe a of- 3`)21, t aLAA.4 6eLefe n Cl3 Cep a .�..�+- s cis i 41E�cIL T-f redu A-t �,�, w — ! 0)0-10 rs( SO--reef �� ail-v., be._ b r -t�-.ed a.o T.<- e r-p tt CC:�t t,,:. S-f 1c,f e r I 4 ,r- 0 1 0'0 Cec - s ✓w 1 v� G� -1-11&_11 ULli G�ce� We Y e r' c -- C i tee.. 3(.r wl d 44.Le ce e 1 occaed ar.��l 5vvt.'I1•v n d�r1.ci-A4 1 t (P7tk ' icte of I 1,4.e, J ek c u o ek.i dt��i�-,iv ceatr ,ae Js vf- .t_ 3 Do rn o-54 I: ice (`l 49/2/i <opeCi (Ffi Gv 5� 0s A � 1- .L: , PROCEDURE - u -o 1'15 uS CZ/ fn-„r,e iii J--J n-r�n/nik.- puki#e v l icyeC Administrative Staff Review. 3P �cC-c �S Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (U, 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Flamm!Draw Section The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: '7- Lz- O Cl 0 IGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-1197 E-MAIL: (sa�f nani @ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes CommerciaLdoc (Engineenng section: preapp.eng) Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON Residential Appinat on/Planning Dnision Section y s .441; {; . PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCENOTES5 r- •,..: ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Qyk £ ri p ? , �trenn r �S�apa ;C r"mortify 2 ?( ( (A PUBLIC FACILITIES -it The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment or the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: R-D. to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ( ) _ to feet from centerline. ( ) to feet from centerline. ku r A\-ro_, S�v l q trJ ��C� 1 a,i ) SD V.1G LArJ fh - D� IF_ AO 011-0,1-4/h__ �W k5 N. -� Street improvements: (0 __P kAt_ street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement j concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑-street trees J street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section "( ) street improvements will be necessary . to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ( ) street improvements will be necessary along to include: ❑ feet of pavement LI concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approva may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreemen. which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvemen district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) ( Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of t Engineering Department Section • are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the tee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. T ere are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW 9, -1AM . Prior to h,-L , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitarar sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located I� ,,•1 (�, a.� co/) . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to tc-1),,447 A&Dr7L-,J t S - Water Supply: (Mi The ( it,, - Phone:(503) 'till provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: f■-kLa. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene-Birchilt, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related tc fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. • V ricL-C IX'(t,1 lZcc�A Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicani to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City wil use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it wil be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project wil require: ( Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ( ) Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. I' • SkUr��,_- p JAR- N1 1 --1(-1 lAL5'r g6 PkoPt 0) 6c,r1?-0— -(" S ORAJE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projectec impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upor the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation o the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based feE category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limitec circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater thar $5,000.00. Pk/ -VF PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineerinc Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: 45) Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections tc main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permitteE must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. The cost of this type o permit is calculated as 4% of the cost of the work and is payable prior to issuance of the permit CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of l Engineering Department Section In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The cost of this permit is also calculated as 4% of the cost of the improvements, based on the design engineer's estimate, and is payable prior to issuance of the approved plan. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. CITY OF 11CARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section • GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary it determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shal include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shalt also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: r►.a/ 4 r' z.0,50 INEERING D PARTMENT S AFF Phone: [503]639-4111 Fax (5031 684-1291 h:lpattylma sters tprea pp.eng (Master section:preapp-.mst) 04-March-1999 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: ck u„ti cox_ Date: (4I 11 bo 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: u�f� al r�X�/in —3 hnA0'd A1,Ly /1,0,7 ui{s Y f c<w-•e At s� ;r fl S ) Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization-Co °•"-' "`L4- Title transfer instrument or grant deed - / ' pj rn"/� � 1 LfI' Written summary of proposal - d o (vie Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) 6.o cce c Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes and a notarized mailing list of all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see attached envelope submittal requirements) Flo f 1'e-2.e m4u/ - ;67 &&c' Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) - a 5 Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes - / Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): T Vicinity Map 2 ' Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map . Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map in e ti /of Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan e4 delta Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Site Development Plan Architectural Drawings Landscape Plan /1141"9"e" ❑ Sign Drawings ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED vZ v e ,oi�S The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES �O COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ' L-t - d ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). 5 A , �x��r n not ��//6th4' u�c. u.47 Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5' for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ • Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level ❑ • Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ • Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The •roposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicini map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, -ddresses and telephone numbers of the owner,developer,en.• eer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, no , arrow and date ❑ Boundary lin- of tract to be subdivided Names of adjac-•t subdivisions or names of recorded owners o adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land ❑ Contour lines relat-, to a City-established benchmark at 2' i -rvals for 0-10%grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 1 b°o ❑ The purpose, location,ty.- and size of all of the followi • (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-w. s and easeme ❑ • Public and private sanitary and s srm sew- lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire d -nts ❑ • Major power telephone transmission • e 50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks,op: spaces, path - s and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with . •iameter 6 inches or • -ater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structure: and the present uses of the uctures,and a statement of which structures are to remain after platti ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed rest( tions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan f. provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural feat es including rock outcroppings,wetlands and marsh area The proposed lot •nfigurations, lot sizes and dimensions and lot numbers. Where •ts are to be used for purposes other 'an residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots ❑ If any of the f. -going information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrati e and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan --Skwv c)c k+ Ccin--(CA.Ax (tLcJcc.c l The owner of the subject parcel CeN\ her ti GlGcs t frv-- ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date — vac A(A u'A r vu�-l' ❑ Proposed property lines 6,pohCa 1,34-. j— ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries lJlww� �lc , w� ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10%or 5' for slopes >10%) fe -vu. ❑ Location,width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent djacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location,size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips El Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\chklist.doc 26-Nov-98 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 • , , ... 4k-' .-..,,,,....og i*,4/H4 ,..'.4„. r ewe., ,,,�, °_, .e.. ..... ..,,,.......4„,...„.„ ,� �� �}e`taw aaj"'. ,#`. . � yJ R x,a�, `S.= : a li ' '' t I " 1 ''''I . ' # 1 �a � �J a lit) 1 i 4A• „ ^� = �"' il s .;:-4 �a; of y�1• , 4 ' 'S + "� s- „ °•° y ,� �' <`r y +1 a i ma r y'--i, ,..1. ;-:..,.... ., �g a s «� ` ,f>4 s 'a , " e +i .-'14-..:,!,.. i*`'" X .• ��''x v: Y #' t.:'P fit �c y , ' iae `t'G:' ° •a �'4.p� ,4 ,. AF, «9 1 � 7 ') z „.°# f i,.- � ' 1 �ce: _$• »-' community D2H2Iopme(1t aiiiy a� `'ICI1 I\\Ii1�r■■t1■1�i1I11u1 9025 S.W. Center Street Phone: (503) 620-2086 ��i,il��:l 1.1��� !�� P.O. Box 23784 FAX: (503) 684-3636 ilfii�ii�iii��i Tigard, Oregon 97223 PROJECT NARATIVE OWNERS AGENT: PROJECT LOCATION: OWNER: NICOLI ENGINEERING TAX MAP: 251 1 1351 4 DAVID METZGER P.O. SOX 23184 TAX LOT: 200, 300 P_O.BOX 215 TIGARD, OR 91281 ADDRESS: SHERWOOD, OR 91140 CONTACT: JIM ANDREWS 1190 S.W. DURHAM RD. PHONE: 625-1045 PHONE: 620-2086 TIGARD, OR 91223 (WILL BECOME PART OF ADJACENT PARCEL) THE OWNER IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THEIR EXISTING STRUCTURE. THE PROJECT WILL BE SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IN CONSTRUCTION TYPE (TILT-UP CONCRETE) AND USE. EXISTING SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING AND CIRCULATION WILL BE EXTENDED / CONTINUED TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION. THE OWNER IS IN THE PROCESS OF COMBINING BOTH TAX LOTS 200 AND 300 THE PROJECT IS SPECULATIVE AND NOT PROPOSED FOR A SPECIFIC TENANT. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE PROJECT WILL CONTINUE THE TENANT PATTERN OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. TYPICALLY THESE THE TENANTS REQUIRE 2,000 S.F. TO 5,000 SF. WHOSE OPERATIONS HAVE SOME ASSOCIATED RETAIL BUT PRIMARILY INCLUDE OFFICES, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, DISPLAY, ETC. THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM TAX LOT 401 TO THE WEST OF THE PROJECT. A VARIANCE WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ADJUSTED SIDE YARD REQUIREMENT. THE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME CONCERN THE USE AND WIDENING OF THE EXISTING APPROACH FROM DURHAM ROAD. ARE THEIR GOING TO BE ANY TRAFFIC STUDIES REQUIRED ? SITE INFORMATION BOTH SITES COMBINED SITE AREA 103,584 SF. (100%) PARKING 101 SPACES TOTAL 58 STANDARD SPACES BUILDING 31,800 SF. (31%) 44 COMPACT SPACES DISABLED SPACES LANDSCAPING-16,362 S.F. (16%) (3 VAN ACCESSIBLE) PAVEMENT 55,422 SF. (53%) 10 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (1 LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING) VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TAX NAP: 251 113B1-I TAX LOT: 200, .300 n. } J m M Q 4 Z S t .* r 0 ai S.W. DURHAM RD. r r 1 TIGARD HIGH 8M'E \4 SCHOOL co �� o�w a U� 0 UNIFIED SEWERAGE 0;' FACILITY DURHAM ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS • RECEIVED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PR 24 ?OOO i! TYPE I APPLICATION OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TIGARD i 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION .r PRE-APP. HELD WITH: • DATE OF PRE-APP.: . 4 T PARCEL 1 ; Property Address(s) 7q/c) Road r.� a e)" 97 y FOR STAFF USE ONLY Oq-o/-Mrs J Tax Map &Tax Lot (s): 2. S j /3 &4 300 Case No.(s): /1/1129aio- Other Case No.(s): Property Owner(s): OG L./d 444-i-2 q e/` Receipt No.:.6y90/6 3c/ Address: PO. Box .275 Phone: (.2S-- 70 /S Application A c�j to y: Date: �a5Qd City: Shier•wood Zip: 17/VO r PARCEL 2 i Date Determin To Be Complete: Property Address(s) 7f9C0 SW Our-144.r) /Pogd //� 01 666 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2..S / /.3 BA - 200 CIT Area: Property Owner(s): figcia drd Oianne Date Recorded and Number: Address: /p 0 Bo XJ 2 7S Phone: 62S' -70 5 - City: S�1e/-kirw0l Lip: q7/ ' O Rev.11/26/98 1:\curpin1masters\Ilaa.doc Applicant"/Agent: 04(.1/141 /14e-fz,yer• Address: 'C. /Sox' 27S Phone: (2S-70 yS City: -s-A jcod Zip: 97/Vo REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with Application Elements Submitted: written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The 0 Application Form owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back © Owner's Signature/V1lritten Authorization of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. p Title Transfer Instrument or Deed PROPOSAL SUMMARY ® Preliminary Map (6 copies) The owners of record of the subject property request Lot Line © Site/Plot Plan Adjustment permission to adjust: (#of copies based on pre app check list) TL✓O parcels of 67, 076 SP and 38, 5/38 SF © Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/1"x 11") number © Applicant's Statement (number) (acreage or square footage) Into / W O parcels of S8 6Y SF and � 8�7 ,r f' (#of copies based on pre-app check list) P , ? 1�� ® Filing Fee $100.00 (number) (acreage or square footage) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. • SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 0 day of ;: 9 C%l) Owner's Signature ' -JAM Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:04/24/2000 11:16 User:front Station: 02 Operator: DEB Rcpt No: 0001634 , Date: 04/24/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 100.00 Name: DAVID OR DIANE METZGER Cash: 0.00 Address: PO BOX 400 Check: 100.00 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount LANDUS Land Use Applications 100.00 1 d- a3 a/24 &' 17-e5-1---\-- gc �► 79/0 At; !.)u, Gt • t-cAv 9 OO f C ci tvd 141- Z.°1-,-e e)(teti.-'per -6v ‘D detys fVjc1 MS'S o?Ce0 - 040 d 7 AEC \yE°P of 12e74 �b � RECEIVED PLANING September 15,2000 SEP 15 2000 �T�ER VENTURES,',LC CM OF z►c � PO Box 400 SHERWOOD,OREGO N 97140 City of Tigard ,�j 1)) 4//1 Planning,Department tat 7800 a 7910 SW I would like to regu� �f ion on the Lot Line Adjust Durham Rd.,Tigard, Thank you fir,' David Metzger Metzger Ventures,LW PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT SITUATED IN THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 13, T2S, R 1 W, OF THE WILLAMEI I E MERIDIAN, PREPARED FOR: DAVID MEILGER WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON P.O. WOOD,2OR 97140 G ( T L O -T)6.--,4)2 � ° ..:" -=VA; T_t1 11 12 (S87.14.s1•F)1 PER 28517 ' ' p/e�R P/c --7��-- - �♦� / 14 13 ( L Z ) (1C1E6 2i�1 - 31.32" (1 1.71.. \�p�p /E' �f PLASTIC°Gw R "PACF,c- f I R■637.96 Pl/�S11c54 PlS"118196 4 SCAL� PER SR ) I OH- 7.64•E PER sN 26617(►1 RECORD X61'8°riap�pp HRH 1" = 50' I D■V2T16' CH- 42'63'SY 211.67• \=5(fp NM)tr TB0a1g' p� I 42'4 " PER S11 2791\(HUD) S �(• I �ON rRCVERT IJ1E L�.16 C cii.Se�;'�'3� ` S O Nu,- 6, 5Q. �• ZP ��'ti -_ L),‘A co S4 alg3 `q� R I ^�gey S \ of �Q '; FOOp 6/6'RON ROD YF1.IA�• '" 1 _ GP PIS 2801"PER 57i 27911 N Netr11,.• aa27.54• 208.80' S by \ii X41 1 12) PER (588.36•, IfH (363, , $FOU 1 1/41'D' PER P�u�4r1066a1R 0V S11 4254 BASIS OF BEARING •FE EAST L11E of TFE SUBJECT PARCEL BEARS N 1 01•25.11'E;1}E RECORD VALUE PER SN 27911. NARRATIVE �yEr iNA 9FC i; II:DD A�1 oO M��ER LEGEND R RECORDS of ', -•.••. couNr( oREno►°30�60�`'TTFF�°..®. PND REGISTERED SUI V . R SIRY i E SUBJECT sT THE ODM1011 Ld1E LAND SURVEYOR '�am • IpK'dTEB 140∎ 1E„T Foul('As NoT D A K kW O *MATES SET Ws*Rd( ROD*1111'au.*FlAsnC GP �.. :;' 70 ESTABUSN •. . - OF TFE SUBJECT C! rig... - R.J►.la OR a717B2 9TAWD Alts E110R' „ 1, �'494 newar x i Amara ()1 RECORD VALUE PER SN 279„ PER tat.min, J (mg -1 �� � APB.T.3909 mg Nam 11-14-If mow EuD BELLS �Ira 86A �9 No () *ICAO IAAASURED VALUE aim lb TONY IIPME1 10kb 1.'9. PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT SITUATED IN THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 13, T2S, R1W, OF THE WILLAME I I E MERIDIAN, PREPARED FOR: DAVID METZGER WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON P.O.ERWOOD,2OR 97140 G ( T L{ 01- .Tl 6-74 � p :i', =iv; ROD 11RM el ld* 1, 12 (S8T14•S1. l PER sN 26617 RECORD 1D9e'� (N �IASt�ca R Pkc� 14 13 _��— , SN 268e6 E1D) (1686,Z3'j) 3 66" 120.8 ,+rTc�•. r1xE1D 6/8'R YELLD�Y, . 1'32 20 \ P,.ASIIC yip PAGFIC' I R■637$e FnU►o a�w` d""'�°�y. SCALE PER sN 2eeee ) I CH- 7'64'E R PER SN 26617 ON RECORD pos171O 1 H = 50' I D-O•2Y16' �' 211•87' ; \FOl1�P 8/ RON Y�fIFi YE11D'�. ,o) I PER 27911 (�) F�Lg YDO'� p ►p lDf�p R-637.90 \ 5().• ç • I �01) rR.PE�Ir�' Ld1E L 6L15 N. 1 p Z .\yM qq FiX60 $i. 0�6 41.54��, pal l � q r UP)ti L6 0,1 6°� oi- '9 1 I I ca5 �. ,\Ip. O. At;.. '- °)' 6/8'ETON ROD YF710�(, N. ' 1 ' - f.-� Pts 2801 PER SN 2'7911 27.64• `•206.80 _ FOUND 4f 1/4'D,PER (S88"3e'44W11 FOUND 568; R (353-1211 1 1/4" (/4uEi D� PER PER 11 1' BASIS OF BEARING THE EAsr LNE OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL BEARS N NARRATIVE 01•2e'11'E;THE RECORD VALUE PER SN 27911. TEES SURVEY*ls colplciED As A 117=RP Er LEGEND RE OPE 0FA�tA1p co RECORDS OF MCAIII(IYOREOON DIE., 1 PRO 1 . R! 11 !WSW PURPOSE OF SURVEY IS TO ADJUSr THE v 1 LINE LARD SURVEYOR �I���Y�M • Waits 14ONU�ENr Fa*As NO ED TFE SIJBJEJlT DoGAt,!(rs ' f Aw o tplGTfs SET 6/8'PO$ ROD*STH YE310"j(.PU�SIIC CAP min ESTABLISH of TFE 9UBJE LT / Oa 97W s�rAWED Ws dlat- y��1 i. T} - L�� I AAI�'R! Alit Mdl ()1 t!pGTES RECDRD VALUE PER PER CLENr'S 1lsTRUCRON TCr TFE E70511fp ' j ' J sN=11 Dtre i iJa NIL 7.mob ON PERM 11-1440 NO () rpiGTES I lfwsllREn VALUE bra EGAD HEELS fie, eEBRAA RE semi Aft TONY!111161 AAA 1'-19' PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT SITUATED IN THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 13, T2S, R1 W, OF THE WILLAMLI I E MERIDIAN, PREPARED FOR: DAVID METZGER WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON P.O. .:PDX. 97140 CiTLf ar -TIC.,-,4, aox y�, .�;" -- as ROD trH1 ' 11 12 (587.14•81 qt PER sN 28617( RECORD /a' 14 13 �/L--— 1' P�at`i1P R PAS,` (16a6,?3)1 3 85" 120.5T,• ' SN 26866 ) Eot11P 8/a R YEL1A� " 1'32 20 \ PLASTIC hw PACrIC.. ' 1 R�.T'7.96 Fouto a Ro►1 Roo�{'R r>:u,a1y, SCALE PER sN 28586 F .D) I cM- Y64'e � PER 25517 rd Pls",99 1" = 50' I D-0.27.16. 211.87' FtxllP a�JW 'PE\R �►s ,03\-v tz-�6' YE11Dr'. SQ.�� I � PROPEan� 4-69.16 pER 594 27911 (IELD) (36'e' 4''' I °/ OF- D-723'a2' \S. DU r. L l o \0....„.....,:;:c6, S o;ej4 •. xi r •..11•o3'Ea1 a/a•RoN Roo�IiH',wok by -. �1 - QOAP PtS 2801 PER SN 27911 N5611,• as '•.' '/F- 4, \ 27.64' FOUI♦D 1 1/4'P PER (sa6 1 P-ki 511 4254(�) (383.12')1 r FOUND a/B'R_�7ltl iEl1A�f, FOUND S1 42541 1(/H ) PER PFRsNN 2A 27911 P(HaD)) as 2eoY BASIS OF BEARING THE vs,LINE OF THE stall=PA4cm BEAR5 N NARRATIVE 01•25.11'E.1FE RECORD VALUE PER SN 27911. 1113 SURVEY_ *AS CONDUCTED 9C�ABs mA�f EY OF THA7 LEGEND RECORDS OF ; - 4 . COMITY oEm PROFESSIONAL 1 I�R'`�'C S E1Ir}C f S7RY • tR11CA765 �0!♦11 T FT)Uip As NarFn T E stair= >si THE LAND SU/R�VEYnOR 1-yam ' �Olk O iEs SET s'_�N ROD V 1 u*. PLASTIC CAP STD ESTABLISH '1. . " 1. Tiff T sUEWECT G-►d�{r.��,\,,,- ,: �7�K; A K A4 aJG42 STAUPED 'ARCS 6pR.' AD P13Im"-`� 7EVF�ykY 1;4:'870.11 artio a iir ex/NftR/ •i foes PJ! AFB /Nit 88-4/11 ()1 lss RE7CCR)VALUE PER SN 27911 PER Cleft's ' l i m� J APIR.7.5600 lr••• 11-14-f6 NO() *imams 1,1EASURED VALUE °°�� � ors MD 1EEiLs s. 6e6T7AlItt9 ■IMBEI MI TOW MIMI roar Sent oy: rAGll1( N W iliLL 503 643 6416; 04/17/00 16:24; tFlu. #986;Page 2/5 I II • `�2/, 8300850 V SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED —STATUTORY FORM (Individual or Corporation) XIMUf41 K.. .A.D LO ..1.. GionIo.Convar.J and c{JOClulty warranty to DAVID G. MQ3?4:G331 t DI71TIttar S. MIt>'rzGT:fi ,• _ _•.. f , Gramme. Iho talk:minO do0Crrbod tool property Iran al oneumbrencao craafed or suffered by the grantor aacapt ea opeanfC011y dot tants Isomer poginn4ng at on iron in the center of county I . 023, said 15oginnitn9 point being 1871.4 foot s. 49•38' Z.'and 80.14 s 50' 46' E Fran the oornor of Sections 11, 12, 13, and 14, 72S, R1W, w.M., being also tho Northwest =emir of a tract harotoforo deeded by John Oche and Magdelano c3eh,t to Tiarry, and 61SYaboth !Terta& by dead recorded in Ilk. 118, pogo 158. Dead Reoorde of Waahingtcst County, running thence South allang the W?at line of said 144priaeh tract 4.30 chains; thence 5. 84'50' Gbst along the South lino or tin M1ko p. Oche tract as dcacrillod in 0oec7 +% , recorded in 8k. 150, page 454, said Deed l'Iocotde, 5.50 choi.ner thence Tenth 5,50 ch,inr to CI =Intnr of said County Road; thence Laaterly fellohrinp center of said road 5.50 chains, more or a lose, to the place of bogiru>,ine3, }�1VR MIT ENCIt'r the East ton foot as doacr3,t d in deed to 14 Robert F. Swain of we recorded in 554. 150. page 453, said Coed Ttc tc ds, and the Wont 120 foot as described in door] to Raxlpth D. Durkee of QM recorded in mc. 422, pogo 100, 8a1e prod Rccerde. 3 Hncumbronao3' SUbjaot to Pasonanta, lapnllitivne anld zoning and uao zostriotioa.' rights of tiro • public in any portion within roads, and the usrual printed exceptions) of title ;elicioa. This deed is given in aatiefaetion of W at curtain contract dated July 21, 1976 and recorded in Sook 1100, page 793 )Toad Tt000rds of Waahiiwjton Counter, Oregon•_- The kW Conadorutlon Tar this aonvaytlnCO Is$ ...... .. . .... .. ..... .. )Hare comply w.th thu roqufrolnontc or ORS 93.090'). F �3,.���.�� 4 Doled Ilya / .. .... . . day of . >?�•I P .3.4 . 10.1?, it a aorporo'a g.cMOr. It has eoueud Y o Its norm to ha sIenod by ordpor of OE aootd at auoctors. ` 1 ,��L. 1t J. .1. x. doioiio'i Y',' ETair OF OelfAtele CSUfOCTlla I 3TATC OF enr,OON. County ea I•■r c,0010 a '5W.il(Y Q.AC L7 r be. .III . P C.O 1% a .I ll s3 ) Ao.aa,u+av a00onte0 and P1,40.1..11y appo.,al IMP 50055 rcllny.J *110. 511015 duly swan • Kcusntnth, mbar.and.mlorea .....Ober. unci, lot ti,n..n4 and nut.no toe II .eye,.O•U sly Owl ISO lalln.•01 ma p.audanl and Il■ l 510 lailee ,155 •. .. find oek ., nok,U.J,U ,Ino laeupolna eves etary of Iho .•ean.11 Or D . their ...•......y nc, ...as uu.0 a Ce,pOtalnan.and Intl said Idc'M lt ma. ... :Janca lel sanau of tt,e cMf•.wwrlww I.y A.•,,w..la at Ii,boned oI UelLaanec and .1011 01 sham nchno'sloddad vale In.l,•unnm to too WI 0OlyMnr, col nod 11000. B1 ory mu: u010ra nlo: i'rYOs lo, Oroeal uv oo,a oa. d = SfIC R• NAV� / 1. wu,•...,,,CI^.u, iF oorl�ml,alon walleye, ' tl Iho laicp It cOro.s11 OP OP,aq a nioaarllr A.MuV,altle PINT iolloopoo •7011 IKtuol co,tb4Jy'o.ee/1 co.,al.,.0,hence trycer M,QUreerrac Nlitiavirn Or 41ror,.aad Mich Ill OW a1111'071°1 co.W.,.t.q.W1 InU.Catu*1 511)'. Kea loth and claiOY-ea WWoor awe e1 01140061 •Goomere Haney are/Wwaso COUaty AS 1NeeM,gten �a • • aavid•and•Oianna.pbt�ier.• 1,Cloned NT.Mellon.effector el A .nt ona TssMtoh and Ka•OtuaM aeabaa of Goo. y.yaac0a WWII/county do t'.',ti comfy In111 ' Inv wllnle Inrlrwnenl OM.rump vim received Oo,n..e'o AL.... and A,mrv•• ... and recorded In beak of ro maa et 1.4 Oeunty. I All,. .•ICa U.nq )•him Ie. .i '-Deslat0 W.;eworh 05.ela,of ivicl•$otagat: • • haaenlllnl 1114 T..ullon. 51- p O.•Dooc• 275. .. •• .. - • .. :� OmciotGM11 c rwav 01.10 Shoywood, OR 01140 : rtal...,. AU,tILi:l. kw -•.. -.' 0.1.1. H mll.n.'..,1„•1 1.11:1.n 1..•.IJ 4iN1.,. t.11.10•1 IV elm ew ..n,i l4n0ooie. !p ji N.. .ala 119B3ifl' 14 PH 12:onl.vlw Wi...0 n, (4)2 K7 1 tiAR i 4 19LJ • a Sent by: PACIFIC N W TITLE 503 643 6416; 04/17/00 16:25; JeLFax_#986;Page 3/5 ` ii . j • I` 83008501 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED—STATUTORY FORM (fndlvidugl or Corporation) Grantor,convoys)and 6paclalM w-vran17 10 •.. 070/TO O. Relscarn 4 DIntage S. i+lT¢t {t, Oianloo, the rollowlnp doacnbo.l foal prOp0rly (loo 01 encumurancoa clouted or autlof0Q t)y the grantor except at 000C1ficaily Cat lorlh ttaraln: Beginning at an iron in tho center of onunty 01. 423, eala beginn4nq polo% being 1871.4 foot [ 8. 89w ga• S.'and 89.14 a 50 48' C fowl tin opener of 13ooticnu 11, 12, 13, and 14, 728, n1W, W.M., being also the Next wort owner of a tract heretofore doodad by Jahn Oche and Megdolons oeha to Harr r and Elisabeth liatbach by deed reCerdad in Bk. 114, page 158, Oned Peoorda of waohbigtan County zunvting thane South along the Wort lino of said feltbach tract 4.30 ohainar thence 8. 14.50' meet along the South lino of the Mika r. mho tract oa doer-gibed in deed c-i recorded in Bk. 150. pogo 454, maid Wed Records, 5.50 chains, thence North S.50 chains to 0 omttor of said minty deeds themes Fbaterl,' following center of acid road 5.50 chain. more e= Use, to the place of beginnings SAVE AND L'I' the riot tan feat as dcaeddbcd in flood to 4 potxnrt P. s►alein at too recorded in hoc. 150, pago 453. said need Fa9erda, and the Wont 120 ,set Ceb as doseril l in decd to nailah D. cuckoo of ux recorded in Bk. 422, ps4lo 100, ask] pool nceosda. 1 EncumSr ncna: Subject to comments, conditions and toning and use rostriotivtsl; rights of t!n , • public Sn any portion within roaas, and the usual printod axocoptions or title policies. 1 This deer, is given in satisfaction of that certain contract dated July WI, 1970 and roccuded in Cook 1100. poet 793 need 1ieeord7 of 9onhington CarrttY. Oregon ti- rho two cot,.ldaraI'on for this convoynnco Is$ •500.00 . (110ra comply win the fogw/amerun 11p OF ORS 93 030.). tz F.. 00100 11113 . ....1.7.... .. cloy of .. , 19.41' It a corporate eraillor, 4 1100 caunod ea name 10(7o Chong ny wale/ DI 119 board of dlroclal9. v. 1 "7.1, s."%ai . . Al ",.... ..,. . )/�'_ +(i eg r i w GAIi 3114„„..: CQ — (N Vrou4L) ' o. ., ._._.1&th_ra gi.lchur^rY y.13.4 it 4,..0.ih and., •Nwwy A lc Io...1 fir nu( :..+r.. n.4.hr 4, .,wl,JelJw31xb-E._Qb2.r..ctiU x219-r)e...Z•_� t Co. ..�._•. ._ —� _�. and I e.•...a 10.11,01 1k l.r•4(.)wiling...MC.).1414.•r. 1 9rd iu dM wlahln lu'V.worn. q} t a tumor is 1 Ir....NMN...414,.Y.,v1Ago l iv Co l i00---t b.CY In4,u.N the W1M• a•'I..w..w,i,.d...I 414.41 m•1 Mgr 17 111• �`k 7 f Pp'cr.a.r. I j,'; pp SHErMY NAv4400 j I!nairwnunl /(3) I . ..... .. nt la Oa us) I cI'' 'r�i sin•1r1l0 f 7i / ShCR.ve_rr.o 17;17114 . �i4n.wq w.ra.rn pills 11,04 491 NIw1N.e.•n•,10.11 ,! tuM . tta•narh and lbla•oa weber U.nnm•••41•041•000 was Add, y {TJT10/eNOOM C44010 M W. t I _ as . SeVid•and.Dianna. otxgat 1.OosalO s t o of Age etsw.1 elm TritOlgPp•iaa• 114 '.bAa /al Cot,- ( 4 n ���tat4.uWt 1`1!11 lap_�411Y lid MNd . a Ownts's 14010..0110 Aaura.. 0••0 l sea , eov$iy. AllIr recp,O.n) ru..m I4 . �M ~,• .E f al . 1 ( ••David-Notagor.. ... ..... 7,. eJ�►.a at,. Ss. 1 11.0..8m- 275 .. `y -..•:;>,.;;,,.at geese, e shm.„„cxtdr OR 9.7140 .r�,,''a. �� Nati.,AO.1•u6s. I.:• rol,ttc'l I wia.r r.crw..vga r4.wau,..m M ins.IohM.41a RAM 4u CAM 10 MY / I. 1111 1(.Iwn..y wu.L.r., !'wP titliltp bp*"�'a0' 1113 RIM I4 PH Ilt 53 { M...... 11011 10•. erg On►-.7114{nail•tile/ .3C! 7aat MT . t..-".... 1. .. PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT SITUATED IN THE NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 13, T2S, R 1 W, OF THE WILLAML I 1E MERIDIAN, PREPARED FOR: DAVID METZGER WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON SHERWOOD,2OR 97140 C iT or: . U1G-,4Y(' D ' _ 11 12 (S871 4151'01 1P111. 7 RETbRD if 'r 5X 1----TDPAMIDO:* 14 13 —��� (1e86,?3�1 373;7 ((120.8 ±• FOUND 6 8 R, ►±YE1L.0* f20 `\ /�' �R PER SN 'f►� I L1=837. Pl/lSTlcef;AP ' ROOdLS"189' SCALE 1 cH•�1r64•E R�637.96 PFR SH 268+7( HECORO FOSff101Q 1„ = 50' D••0.27.1r c•- rz 211.er \ e e•i\ Z112•74°4 Cv \1"MD) I u/ IR6PERLDLATE q 6•16632'E ■ 0'6'$61 SQ I l°`Y C�F^ D-2112• (_/ 0 b fib- ���6 S4. m$ok, 'D NI = Vac'' �'4A.• °J ' \ y j ..11o3g1 YR 5 1 R X S�2 911 ∎a (254 e011 y test 1' . FS 3 111.■ 27484 FOUND 1 1/4'P PER (Ses36'44•E)1 D1A� SN 4764(HELD) (363.1 1 �FOU�1 1/�4'D' PER �6�1R' �PLS�1dO1' SH BASIS OF BEARING TE EAST f!E OF RE SMELT PARCEL BEARS N NARRATIVE 017.5.1M t.THE RECORD VALUE PER S11 27911. Tits SURVEY WAS co ucin,As A�� LEGEND 9F 3962 , . OF 98139621. • •• +a C 8300860„ DEED RExOttD6 OF ', • . COUNTY, ORFDON C PROFRoam= ES'SMO IT 1 MG'RXESIRY • dtICA1ES�oNU1 1(T FOU11D As NoTEn T OF q DO( Ts. THE LINE LAND SURVEYOR ' �Iw M p AI TE 6/r RO• ROD*TIH YELLS. PLASTIC CAP MI ESTABLJSH THE 1 SUBJECT \, iatz F° A K > Ae 9 OW mammy a mtmRr,NOR(MD RF1idA At N!-efal ()+►pGTE4 RECORD VAWE PER SN 27911 BULDf10 PER�YNs�Rt►c►lo1i.To T►E EM51►a mat.�m.1 APE.7. co m +..� 11-1446 Mb NO () Warn 14EASURED VALLE D91Q /b+ a NUD 1YE11s m, 846FLA D1i9 ' Nam at TONY 1EMm 1•-9' • Sent ray: PACIFIC N W MILE 503 643 6416; 04/17/00 16:25; JetFax #986;Page 4/5 0 11C9R, TLE,NSURANr.E 4k 01E3 1 594 6.2-Li PWARRANTY DEED This 1„„, l4TATt?OF ORi00N GRANTOR; THE DURKEE FAMILY TRUST County vl t� 8s ______ iLiRANTRS: DAVID METZGLa rpmi nt.. . ii!.ip,,,,,... 1 Ase.aa.Clark for 10 Ct ty' �Vqt UnU1 a tdurays is;woo led,ail ran Jutemom WWtWI bu 'd.i J 1,„ al .1111}o0A1 Ic tUt FolI4Wlnjt 911dRU: OSnirtyr A- p r1•DAVID METZOAR TT;7910 SW DURHAM ROAD ff c,TIOARD,OREGON 07220 `► '�`� Macro No.tiWA70 Mk No 6ti40?O.YA1 - _. Got,Eta I Alter rocordial return to; Doo r 4833! DAVID METZC38R bleats 222014 186.00 7910 SW DURHAM AUAD I2/20/1916 30;37;3040 Tl{31►RD,OREGON 97221 Az p STATUTORY WARRANTY DEER ta RALlllb D.Dintwsb AND MARY M.PURIM,Co 7avts'TEEB AND ANY Tausreits Wall ARID SUCCESSORS TUEERETO,MIT DATED OCTOl1EA 21, 1992,FA9/0 THE DVRJCKE FMlILV TRUST.Grantor,convoy.and narrows to DAVID�ETTAGIR Graotoo,the Colloonng describ„d Tool psopnrty ,of encumbrances datum as apectfaoally aot forth heroin A$H1Ptgrio$Courtly.Oregon.to wit: SZIL'LEQAz.DESCRIPTION'ATTACHED HERETO AND AY REFERENCE MADE A VARY RRREOB. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT. TIED PL'RSCIN ACQUIRING FElt TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECIC.WMI THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING IMPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO LH1TERb1E411 ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST PARMINU OR FOREST PRACTICE$AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. The said property is free&Ern one cabraowy Gawp:STATUTORY POWIIRS,INCLUDING me POWER OP ASSI318MBNT OF THE UNIFIED C SEWERAGE AGENCY Of WASHINGTON COUNTY. EASEMENTS.AS RECORDED. r- T e t b ceaaideralioa for dna conceptions is$351,000.09 (Hors cvutpty with em zcgwrootenu of ORS 93.030) 6 Dowd this 20111 day ' .IYIL e119 en .....2�t� {l rip -�-�.�..� S�ViIIITiiI Y ?aY i��A .�f:�a r RASMWRTOw COUNTY F'K p I`I . 1 ��' 1+4'oA: NN TAt181SE Pis MID IlATi DIAR K. , &true of Oregon,CouarY of ,( It*forvSoluli lastnunent was acknowlodscrl am Ms g day of RALPH D. DURKEE,TRUSTEE and MARY O.DURKE8.TRUSTEE of 77411 K E FAMILY TRUQ'T s9 cct by tw W of the ovryoration. capara ,on .Nay afo pWai: - ► • rm+A I. P i r1 av /Att .19,!D G E I • • I • • .. sent oy: rWt left N W i 1 i Lt bU:i b4:3 8418; 04/11/00 16:28; J ffj t#986;Page 5/5 •TJC9R,VTLE INSURANCE EXHIBIT 'A° Pan of Section 13,Township 2 South,RangeI.Woaat ooff the , tetra follows: Meridian.deaaribcri ms Beginning et the Northwest corner of that tract convoyed to Mike P.Oche and Dora Ochs in the oentrr of County Road No. 23 by deed recorded hi Deed Book 150.Page the North Une of said Ouho tract 120 feet: thence running Sout 454; with twining W flue if sa said Ochs treat 3.50 chains to the South line thereof; thence naming W reel wilt the ouch limo of acid Ochs hest 120 feet,more or less.to tie Southwest e thereof,loonce oW ilin Nor of acid line of amid tact 9.50 chahre ro the °setal in the thence of Warring aunty on flue West i�Vealungwn and Stott of Oregon. pilaw of beginning,all in the City of Tigard. County of War. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion described it decd to Wachiagtort County recorded July 6, 1995, Fee No. 95046769. P. . - 1 ■ n LL ' Mortgage Investment Co. A Sterling Company March 16, 2000 Advanced copy via fax#(503) 625-5310 Mr. David Metzger P.O. Box 275 Sherwood, OR 97140 Re: Jackson Business Center - "Common Wall Agreement/Reciprocal Easement" Dear David: I spoke with Don Carson at SAFECO today regarding your proposed 10,000 square foot addition to the subject property. Don said that prior to loan closing, SAFECO will require an agreement commonly refereed to as a "party wall" or "common wall/reciprocal easement"signed. In essence, the agreement acknowledges both property owners agreement to allow the ' buildings located on •separate parcels to be attached (even though in this case both property owners are one in the same) and creates a reciprocal access easement for both properties. Typically the document is created by the borrowers attorney. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Aivk e/:72_ Pie) Mark Paskill Loan Officer 5285 SW Meadows Road/Suite 320/Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035/(503) 684-4570/Fax(503) 684-4587 ' C4/201)0 Conditions A. )ciated with Case #: SDR20( 30016 8.4/6:49 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 STREET TREES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 1. Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. 0001 CROSSOVER EASEMENT 0 Not Met MS 11/29/2000 ST 2. Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. 0001 PARKING LOT TREES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 3. Submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. 0001 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 4. Submit a narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recycling Design Standards. 0001 FRANCHISE HAULER 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 5. Submit a verification letter that the franchise hauler approves the refuse container and location. 0001 PARKING STALLS/WHEEL STOPS 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 6. Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. 0001 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR BICYCLES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 7. Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. 0001 BIKE RACK 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 8. Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. 0090 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure, new driveway construction,signal modification (if necessary),and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. This permit shall be obtained by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat. 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO READ 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS 0 Met 12/01/200C BDR 12/01/2000 BDR 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential pubic streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application,and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 0001 SUITE LAYOUT MAP 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church, Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated,which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. 0001 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 13. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace it with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. 0001 ONSITE DETENTION 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall submit a plans that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. Page 1 of 2 50 S.W. Pacific Hwy. r � � ,,) � "-� o � I�� /� P.O. Box 23784 !����w ©r /r111\1� ��G�1� ENGINEERING Tigard, Oregon 97223 OAT( Joe NO 1/ • 3°• 00 19 -0904 and Construction Services, Inc. (503) 620-2086 ATTENTION M 44,t-14 TO _!J l•T o t% Ti - 4'i.bHH1NZA > lalt•.t �ckso 3U511`l1v�f c-xrE12 13u11.,bN,L,-, AMII I b N _601z. Vzo - dan1 to GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU C''Attached O Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications "Copy of letter f] Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 11•I1•DO 3 tZ rt,Nci L�TrCf - 'T-b 5.17 12. 6OKDITIOt4 r 11 . 1 • b D 1 STaIzM 11AL-rt Id 4 #)2,41M,AGT n1:5i ipt14 G1S.L.G 4. 11 .2.4.0o _ Co F' I b -b1EPOS L A171D120VA.1� t1•to-OO 1 GbN - - 101, . L - 3 co•2p-cam /4xStP 12r,vlb 'b2. twiJ M - 4Z- Ytv-17 11 Is•a, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: I "For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections O Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US MARKS T —OA S —177 1 / 1z tlam COPY TO SIGNS ci/retl4.7D I t 1 - I I . _ _ . _ NICOLI _ _ !ENGINEERING - and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 November 17, 2000 NEI #: 99-0904 City of Tigard City of Tigard Planning Division Engineering Division ATTN: Mathew Scheidegger ATTN: Brian Rager 13125 SW Hall Blvd 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Jackson Business Center Addition Tigard, OR SDR 2000-00016 Dear Mr. Scheidegger and Mr. Rager: The following numbered responses correspond to your numbered review comments. If you have any questions please feel free to contact this office at your earliest convince. GENERAL COMMENTS: Our earlier proposal indicated that the manufactured "Stormtreat" system was to be used for our water quality facility. Due to the cost and scheduling issues, we are no longer going to use this system. The plans have been reviewed to use a dry pond for our facility. The facility will be located where the "Stormtreat" was previously located. The design calculations have been included for Mr. Regars review. REPSONSES: 1. Steet trees (dogwoods) have a 8" diamater caliper which meet the 3" minimum caliper. Spacing has been adjusted to meet the 20-30' spacing criteria. the existing tree (sequoia) and the west side of the entrance should meet the size and spacing requirements (sheet 1.2). 2. The owner has contracted with another firm to provide a crossover easement. 3. The parking lot trees have been increased to a 2" caliper. All others appear to be of adequate caliper (sheet 1.2). 4. See attached narrative. For speculative type structures this process requires substantially less area than that required by the franchise hauler. 5. The approval from Pride Disposal has been enclosed for your approval. CAA- I ENIGINERIN and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 6. The wheel stops have been added to sheet 1.1. 7. The bicycle directional signs have been noted at the landscape island near the project entrance see sheet 1.1. 8. The bicycle rack details has been noted on the landscape plan sheet 1.2. 9. The owner has contracted with the firm of Harris McMonagle to respond to street opening permit requirements. 10. Understood. The owner has been notified. 11. See attached vehicle access and parking plan SK-1. 12. A suite layout cannot be determined at this time as this is a speculative venture and spaces are yet to be leased. 13. No comment required 14. Understood. See general comments. 15. Understood. See general comments. 16. We are of the understanding that there is a 35' right of way from the center lien. We will have this issue verified. 17. Understood. 18. Understood. Also enclosed is the Waste Management Narrative. Once again, if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James Andrews Project Manager jda/hmb enclousres NI'COLI _ Nfl4EING and Construction Services, Inc. Street Address: 9025 Southwest Center Street Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23784 •Tigard, Oregon 97281 (503) 620-2086 • FAX (503) 684-3636 WASTE MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE: The tenants are not defined at this time. We will use the Minimum Standards Method, as outlined in METRO's Model Zoning Ordinance. Assumptions: Office: 5,676 s.f. (55%) Warehouse: 3,096 s.f. (30%) Light Industrial: 1,548 s.f. (15%) Add to the predominate use office. Office: 4 s.f./1000 s.f.+ 7,224 s.f. / 1000 = 7.2 x 4 = 29 s.f. Warehouse: 6 s.f./1000 s.f. = 3096 s.f. / 1000 =3.096 x 6 = 18.76 48 s.f. + 10 s.f. = 58 s.f. required. According to this method a 58 s.f. dumpster enclosure is required. We have provided a 367.5 s.f. enclosure. 0 `RPmawiRENZI9ae3031VEaarr- MMMMMM;NM on C.••VUC1ww 9..t.•c Mb S.C. W ••A Y19M iq•l Oq•0703 0.. 010 111-201 FAD OR 91F13 BILDNO ADDITION FOR JACKSON BUSIESS CENTER 7910.7000 SW DURHAM RD 11GARD.DR 97223 DDT DAVID METZGER Dar H-1-W S_ Amy by Dl D•A•E by SA Jab NA. 90004 Ao-•Hq 9>: MS SITE PLAN 9([1 SK-1 11/29/00 14:46 0503 "'5 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Q1001/006 PO Box 820 Sherwood 9714D Fac6256179 Ph:6256177 Pride Disposal Co. Fax To: Aji`c_.oil' E rom: ,i Fax: (914 - . 3 (, Pages: Phone: Date: ( -- z R r0 Re: CC: Sa-w, .2_5 414 cf v,,,j 5 ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment❑ Please Reply ** Please Recycle ** • Comments: kar ,7446 it ,-- h-e-ett s 14 -�•-L 4 -si..,�� - -•C w-s wf 11/29/00 14:46 $`503 ' 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL fj002/006 • SENT BY; NICOLI ENGINEERING INC., 503 684 3636; NOV ..0 10:32AM; PAGE 2/3 s:," of e , ii li . ■Y. i I- ;� r 4 1111 _ re A III • / / . /1 . / / / . �; i r nuaoo1u1Z� N r F • — _ 1 =i. 1! h , , __ , / � Z st J: ...... , .._........• ........• t Jr g iiI i 1 i iti . I = 1 I IT ' I f t u......muu+1u.4. II III 1 'i ( �v 1 / • _ 1 � r� . �u I I III �� Is A M r,, L INS' , 'r :lr__ ' t WY IC'XII _.--. f--... - I : : mr..mm.....ar■ ■M ► V1. MIS I I I M h ,r-:,i— �... • . iiii • �741,1 •• isiiir ill w tr 11/29/00 14:47 '8`503 - -5 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Z1003/006 SENT BY: NICOLI ENGINEERING INt. - 503 684 3638; NOV-A_ JO 10:33AM; PAGE 3/3 . f■�■ ��■■■ 1 / _�_-- 1 j � I _; I ----- -, �� --- --- -- -\-•-- - - i- m . a n 1:11 ia- - •. iz i 41 ° el I ‘( ,1-- • NM i � � :a; ti m • Q 4 .9 Q x9 I al 0 CI Imo- £ �I� m i R1 r Co e • � `a Ii kt ,, _ X i GI v r` u 0 ; • �_ I■ . • IN e LL1 to • Cr,i? ;1- —. t in ..---- el ----. • • / / 110-.0i7wi.C".101 / / 2 b tu. ', .'. .. .'. .,11!, °0-.6 w U n' 1 d. \ do 4110': Os •••••.....•0 aZteC2C01,001100 • • * CD 0 0 WASTE. DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS BEFORE OCCUPANCY OPTION # I OPTION # 2 a. 1.) These are all inside measurements for walls of the enclosure. 2.) NO CENTER POST AT ACCESS POINT. r-i a 3.) Gates hinged in front of walls not inside. This will allow for the extra 15 degrees in opening angle needed. Also allow for 3 feet clear from side wall to 15 degree swing needed. 4.) Space between containers is for access to recycling totes. ti 5.) Recycling totes are 25"x 26" allow 13" between recycling totes. 5.) Gates must be able to be pinned in the open and closed position. N PRIDE DISPOSAL COMPANY . 11/29/00 14:47 $503 1 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL Ed1005/006 . - . . I 1 . • • - — ... —• I I,- — - • .. . - • - ------ _:.1.0 .=--C4" — — ill , isp_i______ • . — • ! —T—k-- — • II .. .- 1 1 " - A ..._ A ; ..c......—. D) I = . • . ' • . . I .•-1 . 1 I : 1 I , 1 . i . . , . II P . . 4 I. 0 . , , Ce. M . • . CI ... . . • . . D . . 0 . . . . b . > . o .• , Co 0 . K . 0 : 13 13 . H . . 33 . ' Z 0 0 i ; ...------ - . .... : . . • _____L: . 1 c .• ri :..1 1 " ipmmL ' el I 0::: ' x1/29/00 14:48 $503 1 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL g]006/006 • o _: ir:! k.1 I • ■ '111 M I > . I I • 'U £ N O. .w `D Po 1 v -Fn-• . . _ _ 1< 0 el v ... CD O cD CO> n > r ,v 0 0 O a cri " -0 a XI Z a r� 1 * ___,. h1 0 ✓L( -41^ 01/23/2001 Conditions I ociated with Case #: SDR2( -00016 9:43:18 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 STREET TREES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 1. Submit a plan showing street trees at a minimum 3-inch caliper and spaced 20 to 30 feet apart. 0001 CROSSOVER EASEMENT 0 Met MS 01/23/2001 MAS 2. Record a crossover easement for the access and walkways for both Tax Lots. 0001 PARKING LOT TREES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 3. Submit a plan showing parking lot trees to be at least 2-inches in caliper. 0001 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 4. Submit a narrative addressing one of the four methods of waste management that will be used according to the Mixed Solid Waste and Recycling Design Standards. 0001 FRANCHISE HAULER 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 5. Submit a verification letter that the franchise hauler approves the refuse container and location. 0001 PARKING STALLS/WHEEL STOPS 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 6. Submit a plan showing all parking stalls to the north and west of the proposed addition that abut pedestrian walkways and the stalls that abut the boundary of the site will have wheel stops at least 4 inches high and located 3 feet back from the front of the parking stall. 0001 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR BICYCLES 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 7. Provide directional signs for bicycle parking from the front of the building. 0001 BIKE RACK 0 Met MS 11/30/2000 MAS 8. Submit a detail of the bike rack to be used. 0090 STREET OPENING PERMIT/P-IMP PLANS 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the old driveway closure,new driveway construction,signal modification(if necessary),and any other work in the public right-of-way. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plans for review and approval. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. This permit shall be obtained by the applicant prior to approval of the final plat. 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 10. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 0001 CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS 0 Met 12/01/200C BDR 12/01/2000 BDR 11. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential pubic streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application,and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 0001 SUITE LAYOUT MAP 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 12. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall submit a suite layout map to Kit Church,Engineering Department. Suite numbers will then be assigned by the City and the address fee will then be calculated,which must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the site permit. 0001 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 13. The applicant's construction plans shall show that they will physically remove the existing driveway at the western boundary of the site and replace it with concrete curb and sidewalk to match existing. The plan shall also show that the applicant will install street trees along the frontage of this site. 0001 ONSITE DETENTION 0 Not Met BR 11/29/2000 ST 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall submit a plans that shows how they will provide onsite detention to meet USA's Design and Construction Standards. Page 1 of 2 rEFIRCE. URD,iN LRFLAN ID -50:5-294-?941 DEC 1 ;'. 'f- 14 : 5:� No .006 F . 02 • JORDAN, CAPLAN & PAUL AITokNI Y,s o f I.AW >sc PITTUCk HI O1J( 921 SW wARI11Nu rnN,!'?V,Icy POk r1 ANL .ul(t'ctN cmo Thl.r,Pl1UNh(091)224-u417 MIt•HAPT k JORDAN,P( FAX(StU)7w4.'P191 SCOTT U.CAPLAN,PC ! RQHKAT IOKDAN RICHARD k.PAUL (192A.IOS+2) December 12, 2000 XIA,,,pACS1MJJ - (503) 684-4587 Mr, Mark Paskill Intervest Mortgage Investment Company 5285 S.W. Meadows Road, Suite 320 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Re: I lcn p11,1tnnaC!�.aw Dear Mark; Pursuant to your request, enclosed please rind a Common Wall Agreement with respect to the above referenced matter. Please provide this document to the Investor, so that they can, prior to closing, contact me with any modifications they may desire. In light of the above, I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest Convenience. Very truly yours, SCOTT D. CAPLAN SDC:vjw Enclosures CC: Metzger Ventures, LLC uG/. -L1 uutlnui 1,1 1 1A1GHU4 uu uuuvu�ti�� 1 LPK1.1 'uPDSN3CaP1.RN ID ' -503-294-?941 DEC 12 ' 14 :58 No .UOb F . 05 AFTER RI?CORDING RETURN TO: SCOTT D. CAPLAN ATTORNEY AT LAW 921 S.W. Washington Street Suite 755 Portland, Oregon 97205 PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DATED: , 2000 BETWEEN: Metzger Ventures, LLC, an LLC organized under the laws of the State of Oregon ("1st Party") AND: Metzger Ventures, LLC, an LLC organized under the laws of the State of Oregon ("2nd Party") RECITALS: A. Metzger Ventures, LI.0 ("1st Party") is the owner of real property commonly known as 7800 S.W. Durham Road, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon, and the said property is described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. The property Is Improved property with office and warehouse space. B. Metzger Ventures, LLC ("2nd Party'') is the owner of real properly commonly known as 7910 S.W. Durham Road, in the City of Tigard County of Washington, State of Oregon. Said property is described on Exhibit 11 attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. The 7910 S.W. Durham Road property is going to house extensions and improvements to the real property located at 7800 S.W. Durham Road, C. The wall at 7800 S.W. Durham Road is the common wall with the wall of 7910 S.W. Durham Road. (Said wall is referred to herein as the Party Wall). D. The extent to which the Party Wall is situated on the respective properties is not known by the panics on this date of this Party Wall Agreement, PAGE t - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DEC. -21' O0 (THU) 13:47 INTEREST TEL: 15036844587 P. 003 FI.Rkr-E .JOkflI NRCtiFLRN In ' ' -503 294-7941 DfC 12 ' 14 :58 Nn .006 N .04 E. The parties desire to establish their respective tights and obligations with the Party Wall through this Agreement, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that the above described real property is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, and occupied subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges, and liens set forth in this Agreement. SECTION I. DECLARA`TLQN F PA1fl WALL In consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties to this Agreement, the panics agree that the Party Wall, and any extensions of it. shall be legally deemed to be a Parry Wall in all respects. SECTION 2- Either party shall have the right to use the side of the Party Wall facing the party's property in any lawful manner, Including attaching structural or finishing materials to it. However, except for the original plans and specifications regarding the Party Wall, and except by Amendment as set forth in this Agreement, a party shall not create windows or doors or place air conditioning equipment in the Party Wall. SBcT14N 3 3.1 in the event of any damage or destruction of the Party Wall from any cause, other than the negligence of either party and except as provided in Section S of this Agreement, ("1st Party") and ("2nd Party") shall, at joint and equal expense, repair or rebuild the Party Wall on the same exact location, and at the same sire, and of the same or similar material and like quality with the Party Walt existing on the date of this Agreement. 3.2 The parties agree that repairs and reconstruction of the Party Wall shall be undertaken, if and when a condition arises which may result in damage or injury to person or property if repair or construction work is not undertaken. Either party, upon discovering the possibility of damage or destruction, shall notify the other of the nature of the damage, the work required to remedy the situation, and the estimate cost of the repair or reconstruction. The other party shall then have twenty (20) days from the receipt of the notice either to object to die repairs or reconstruction or to pay the party's share of the cost of the work. However, in the event of an emergency (i.e., a condition that is immediately threatening to the safety of persons or property) the other party shall then have five (5) days from the receipt of the notice, which notice shall state that an emergency exists, either to object or the repairs at reconstruction or to pay the party's share of the cost of the work, PAGE 2 - PARTY WALL AGRE8MENT DEC. -21' 00(THU) 13:47 INTERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 004 PERCE- IUR'DR'H,CRPLAN 11' 1 -503-294-7941 DEC 12 ' 14 :5�t No .006 V . 05 3.3 If either party's negligence shall cause damage to or destruction of the Party Wall, the negligent party shall bear the entire cost of repair or reconstruction. 3.4 If either party shall neglect or refuse to pay such party's share of the coat of repair or restoration, or all of the cost in ease of negligence, the other party may have the wall repaired or restored and shall have lion rights against the property of the other party under Section 8 below. 3.5 In the event of destruction to the Party Wall (i.e., where eighty percent (80%) or more of the Party Wall is destroyed by fire, earthquake or other cause), neither party shall be obligated to repair or restore the Party Wall and this Agreement shall terminate without further action of the parties, SECTiQN&4- 4,1 Each party to this Agreement. and its respective successors and assigns, shall have any easement in that part of the land of the other party on which the Party Wall is located, as may be necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.2 Each party and its respective successors,assigns,contractors, licensees,agents and employees shall have an easement in that part of the land of the other party necessary or desirable to repair, restore, or extend the Party Wall. 4.3 Either party to this Agreement shall permit the other party and such other party's contractors, licensees, agents and employees to enter its property for the purpose of repairing, restoring and/or extending the Party Wall, and shall secure the permission of the tenants, if any, occupying the property for such entrance, 5.1 Either party may at any time, upon thirty (30) days' notice to the other party, extend the Party Wall horizontally or vertically. The notice shall include copies of the plans and specifications applicable to the proposed extension or addition. The part of the Party Wall that is to be extended shall become part of the Party Wall. All work shall be performed in a manner to reasonably minimize the damage to the premises of the other party. The party performing the work shall pay for the cost of repairing any damage to the premises to the other party. 5.2 In the event that either party desires to increase the thickness of the Party Wall for the purposes of increasing its height and it is necessary or desirable, in the reasonable Judgment of such party, that a portion of the footing required to sustain the increased thickness be placed beneath the property of the other party, then it may be so placed at the sole cost of the party desiring the additional footing. The footing shall be constructed in accordance with engineering standards then prevailing in Tigard, Oregon, in a manner so as not to endanger the PAGE 3 - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT!' DEC. -21' 001THUi 13:48 11TERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 005 +i'EHKCE/JDRDNNKCRPLAN Ir ' -503-294-?941 DEC 12 ' 1 15 :00 No .006 P .06 Party Wall or any building on the land of the other party, In addition, the party at whose instance the footing shall be built shall he liable for any and all damages occasioned by the construction work performed on the land of the other party. 5.3 The party extending or adding To the Party Wail may use the increased portion for t e party's building, provided that the extension or addition Is constructed in a manner which can safely sustain the Party Wall for both parties' buildings if both buildings were increased in height and size to that to which the building of the party extending the Party Wall is increased in height and size. MI extensions of the Party Wall shall be constructed in compliance with all laws and ordinances in force and effect at the time. 5.4 The party extending or adding to the Party Wail shall be responsible for the cost and expertise of building the extension and addition and thensefter restoring or repairing it as provided in Section 3 of this Agreement. 5.5 After the Party Wall has been extended or added to by one party, the other party may use the increased portion for the party's building, provided that after the other party commences to use such increased portion of the Party Wall, the parties shall each share one-half (1/2) the coat of maintenance and repair of the Party Wall, as provided in Section 3 of this Agreement, If either party constructs a wall or adds structural support within such party's respective property which is not physically connected to the Party Wall, the other party shall not have any right to use such new wall or structural support. 5.6 This Section shall continue to be applicable to any arid all subsequent extensions or additions to the Party Wall. 5,7 Any extension of or addition to the Party Wail shall be built in a substantial and workmanlike manner of like durability, strength, and fire-resisting qualities to the Party Wall and shall conform in all respects with all applicable laws and ordinances. SEcTipji 6, DULUWWwil Each party shell be required to obtain, and maintain, "All Risks" insurance for its respective building in an amount equal to 100% of the full replacement value of the building, (exclusive of the costs of excavation, and foundation), without deduction for depreciation. The policies of physical damage insurance shall, if the same are available without any increase in the premium for the iinsurance coverage, contain waivers of subrogation and waivers of any defense based on co-insurance or a prorate reduction of liability, or of invalidity arising from any acts of the insured. Each party shall, upon written request of the other, deliver to said party copies of the party's policy of physical damage insurance and renewals of such insurance, together with proof of payment of said premiums. PAGE 4 - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DEC. -21' 001THU) 13:48 IhTERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 006 ='EARCE_ ?ORDAN&CAPL(1N Ir' - ' -503-294 7941 DEC 1i ""1 15 :01 No .006 P .07 SECTIQN7. Bii .WATIQN Each of the parties agrees to indemnify the other against the party's share of liability for injury or personal or property damage, when such injury or damage shall result from, arise out of, or be attributable to any maintenance or repair undertaken pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement, or extension or modification undertaken pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement. S0.T lONJI. LitibLJUGHTS If either party fails to pay for its share of any expense or cost under this Agreement within fifteen (15) days after delivery of written notice of such failure, the non-defaulting party shall have the immediate right to record a lien against the property of the other party which is subject to this Agreement in the amount owed, The amount of the lien shall Include interest at the rare of nine percent (9%) per year from the date of the expenditures. This Agreement shall run with and bind the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by a party owning any interest in i'ax lot 00200 and Tax Lot 00300, known respectively as 7800 S.W. Durham Road and 7910 S.W, Durham Road, in the City of Tigard, State of Oregon, and more particularly set forth in the Recitals to this Agreement. CBLLAMILS 10.1 Anal= No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless and until executed by all parties owning any interest in Tax tot 00200, or Tax Lot 00300 known respectively at 7800 S.W. Durham Road and 7910 S.W. Durham Road, in the City of Tigard, State of Oregon, as more particularly set forth in the Recitals to this Agreement, and recorded in the land records of Washington County, Oregon. 10.2 Mell.lAtiOatillationa. Excepting in matters for Injunctive relief, any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this agreement, including, without limitation, the making, performance or interpretation of this agreement, shall be settled either by mediation instituted at the request. of either party, or if not resolved by mediation, by arbitration in Washington County, Oregon. Judgment on any arbitration award may be entered in any court having .jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy. Such arbitration shall be in accordance with ORS 36.200-36.265 as in effect, and as hereinafter amended. The Parties to the arbitration shall be entitled to such discovery as would be available to them in a court or jurisdiction in Washington County, Oregon. The arbitrator will have all authority of the Court incidental to such discovery, including authority to issue orders to produce documents or other materials, and to submit to deposition, and to impose appropriate sanctions, including awarding against the party for failure to comply with any order. PAGI? 5 - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DEC. -21' 00(THU) 1349 INTERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 007 F EARC.E:.30RDRN9.17 nPLAN 17' 1-503-294-7941 DEC 12 ' "'', Nc .0013 P .08 It is agreed that all facts and other information relating to the mediation or arbitration arising out of this agreement shall be kept confidential to the fullest extent permitted by law, The cost of the arbitration shall be borne equally among the parties. 10.5 ainkling.TafeeL The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 10.4 CiteszuetienAuelJeleametien, The headings or titles of the sections of this Agmement are intended for ease of reference only and shall have no effect whatsoever on the construction or interpretations of any provision of this Agreement. The use in this Agreement of the words ''including", "such as", and words of similar import following any general statement, terms, or matter shall not be construed to limit such statement, terms or matter in any manner, whether or not language of non limitation (such as "without limitation" or "but not limited to") is used in connection therewith, but rather shall he deemed to refer to all other items or matters that could reasonably fall within the scope of the general statement, term, or matter. All provisions of this Agreement have been negotiated at arms length and this Agreement shall not be construed for or against any party by reason of the authorship or alleged authorship of any provision thereof. 19,5 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Oregon. l0.( bleu Allyn. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the Party Wall and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements between them with respect hereto. 10.7 NgIleere Notices under the Agreement shalt be in writing and shall be effective when actually delivered or three (3) days after being deposited in the United States Mail, certified, return receipt requested, directed to the other party at the address set forth on the first page of this Agreement, or to such other address as the party may indicate by written notice to the other party. 10.8 SeyeeabiljUe„ If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall to any extent be Invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term or provision of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 10.9 Waver, failure of either party at any time to require performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not limit such party's right to enforce such provision, nor shall any waiver of any breach of any provision of the Agreement constitute a waiver of any PAGE b • PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DEC. -2I' 00(THU) 13:49 INTERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 008 FEH,:t. - .tUkDI;NMI i('L(1N V -3C3-294-7941 DEC 12 ? 15 :02 No .006 P _9 succeeding breach of such provision or n waiver of such provisions itself. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless set forth in writing and sighted by the party to be bound, 10.10 R,zipg, The parties understand that this Agreement shall be recorded in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, and together is binding on the parties and their heirs, successors, and assigns. The cost of recording the Agreement and/or any changes or amendments thereto shall be borne equally by the parties. 10.11 btu. This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for as long as the Party Wall stands. 10.12 j ,pt*j31211 ry Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended or shall be construed to confer on any party, other than the parties to this Agreement, any right, remedy or claim under or with respect to the Agreement. 10.13 antler Assail/W. each party agrees to execute and deliver such other documents, and do and perform such other acts and things as any other party may reasonably request, in order to carry out the Intent and accomplish the purpose of this Agreement, 10.14pjrd, The exhibits referenced in this Agreement are part of this Agreement as if fully set forth In the Agreement, METZGER VPNTUR2S, LLC METZG13R VENTIJRFS, LLC Title: B t:e; - --WCTM 25113BA, Tax Lot 00200 ("1st Party'') WCTM 2511313A, Tax Lot 00300 ("2nd Party') PAGE 7 - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT DEC. -21' 00(THU) 13:49 INTERVEST TEL: 15036844587 P. 009 rti—W_tiJuNUHNKLHPLHN 1li1 -505-294-?941 DEC 12 'n0 15 :02 No .006 P . 10 i STATE Oil OREGON ) ) U. County of Washington ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of 2000, by , who is the _(title) of (Company), an LLC organized under the laws of Oregon, on behalf of such company. STATE OP OREGON ) ) County of Washington ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this �.,.. day of _ , 2000, by , who is the _ (title) of (Company), an LLC organized under the laws of Oregon, on behalf of such company. PAGE 8 - PARTY WALL AGREEMENT ■ NicoIi Elgineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 2 4 2001 CITY OF TIGARD May 23, 2001 NEI#: 99-0904 City of Tigard Planning Department ATTN: Matthew Scheidegger 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tinard OR 972.23 RE: Jackson Business Center, Building Addition 7910 & 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97223 SDR: 2000-00016 Dear Mr. Scheidegger: Mr. Metzger, the property owner, has been direct by his lending institution to combine both tax lots 200 and 300 into one parcel. A survey is being performed at this time. I have notified Mr. Poskins in the Building Department and have modified our permit documents to reflect this change. My question to you is what will be required from your department to implement this change? The major requirements fro the initial review has been responded to in our revised documents (delta 1, dated 11-15-00) submitted on 11-30-00. The remaining issues were the crossover easements that are no longer required with the lot consolidation. Please notify this office if additional information is required. Any help to expedite this process woaid be greatly appreuiaieu. Sincerely, r .,z {a",v1.4.1)-t?James Andrews, Project Manager X:1.1-9909041Letters\Property Line Adjustment.doc C5/23/2001 15:13 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard 002 Status Report for Jackson Bus. Center Addition Project: Jackson Bus Ctr. Status as of May 23,2001 Site Address 7910 SW Durham Rd. Land Use Case: SDR2000-00016 Contact: Jim Andrews Prepared by; Sherman Casper Phone(503) 620-2086 City or Tigard Fax:(503) 684-3636 Permits Coordinator Phone (503) 639-4171 ext 322 Fax (503) 598-1960 E-mail she rmanAci.tigard.or.us Requirements before Site permit can be issued: Condition # 9 Obtain a Street Opening Permit for work in the public right-of-way. Condition # 10 Provide Engineering department legal name. Condition # 12 Submit to Kit Church (Engineering dept.) Suite layout and pay addressing fee Condition # 13 Remove existing driveway. MIS2000-00018 Recorded lot line adjustment. Fees due before Site permit issuance: Addressing fee to be determined (see condition of approval #12) Requirements before Building permits can be issued: Condition #16 dedicate additional right-of-way along Durham Rd. Fees due before Building permit issuance: Building permit fee to be determined by Permit Technician the contact person will be notify when total permit fees are calculated after plan review is complete Requirements before Final Inspection can be issued: Condition # 17 Complete work in the public right-of-way Condition # 18 Provide building dept. written confirmation from design Eng water quality facility complies with specifications All permits pass final inspection All fees paid. Fees due before Final Inspection (C of 0) issuance: Deferred Traffic Impact Fee $21,231 Note this fee is sub'ect to a 6% increase if deferred and not •aid before July1,2001 • L LEGEND RECORD OF SURVEY REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (28,405)• T000 ma(Yd,a X01m NI S1,..SURVrl NO ...SWIM S2...SWI N0,11742 s7,..S"N.1=e S4 1°4"R0,T16TT • row) IOW PAO WM A/UMW CO FOR PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT ss,..suRrtY rlD.2u1 56..,sDIR1EY 1D.224'b WM'ISA s,RK,•'tl'10"•(rin• MINI Tl1E NoNTHEAST QUARTER Cr 7HE NCIETWIEb1 QUMMA 17...SI.NIEY Na 21111 s11 RYEY No,Inn t art y4•x w•ON Ma 004 1010'0 P.4014 0V SEL710N 13,T01RO HIP 2 SOIRN,RANCE 1 WEST,WM. i--}}'��h{ , A rr um=-reap Al TIDY J1w'RI 1 am {{D01)...RELORDFM TEE N0,6R1J162i WASNIXCfON CDUNT'f T3CID MORES • [ADAM"PAM 000445 RA11D 111 1n CRY DF TI6A20,IMENINCTON MUM,OREGON (x2]...RCCOfrOEA'S FEE NO.117041004,143111101 cowry CIJK DEED RCOORLTS 113 ECOROEWS NEE NO.190111013.1,1A41WCTON COUNTY COO RECORDS ''1r.• NARR•TIVE M14.1 1••••w SLGIION CIOOkER JAVLMA/3,2/01 rotate 2"MSS OON Da PURPOSE OF YNI$SURVEY IS TD AM1ST 1VE PROPERTY UIE H YD111IUEM I07c " /ET11EU!NNE TRACTS Of LA/1D OIIPD!IY DAND 4 WINE NETLGER FM F IOOX 3.PALE■141 a APER IRE ND R�DR000'SR FTC NI 04313 524.rum THE 11 TEE OF llAK 6501 RIDER CONTRACT Of PUROUSE KR M 00541•10(5 PW011DED AS y RECORDER'S FEE NO.9SD6104S1.5AD PRCP[314 UT/ADUUTTI1EUT • S, BOND APPROVER EY THE CRY O*TIGARD Al CASE R.1 NIS 2000-D0011 n e it P ull•rrt 1111.41' `�Y� . �` r -- 1 _ _ -AMA (� uVJiPb,_ 7111 PIRJPEIRY UNf CC0.KON TO SAA TEAR."'WAS NOVUJIMCA 14 1 1115 1'wRT 14,9 `4( NAM 11.6810 27411.R„13NN711N MINTY 11R[IEY REL0AD0.I u U D.P.Z.�, MAO �•'RD7 - - '+KPA,. A� 1DU O AND TFD'most S4ONUU[MS RBI SRI SURVEY.(NOM Y• 11• Jb R1K.PI.,T1''r;X�N.OkpN1m _`T}ti• '•K A,/ Ail NOVUlOITS 0OT[FOUND TO IC IN ACR0DICM'11114 RECORD.1121EN ` O(Mr'A1.1 14.Lmmox) ra at 1 R�►ra ow.r, --�1.® .S., so l,ONJUCRTS 1D WAX TNC AruusTE1 PROPERTY UNE AS SOWN 6.00' 1 s 51,3 1.115T l air•' A- _` KAEON.FOR A ass Of RWRN6S l 160 OK UDNUURS ON I1E �'1 la•Ap Uuiy0:.1 �' I-'"'''7• ��s.,4_4 AS S J11�1171Y CURRAN ROAR PER 0.0 111 WRIER 4011 77011,TIXVI '04,03/6.005 M011114 F09.0.VS"MN MO 11TH .r7b' ��JD110• I-. 11Trr H 11500[P WRam I eN- J_�. 1 warm) *MUT PR lI W IraA M 41 W(11 d PRAT Vr'T \\\ �: 111 10411 5:390 o aJ A.30 I1 r.,1 r.Ri� ■ F., i7 501.«0 0.0•,•w 0001 x104 '1 5179M 4ITAFm w Y40AV I •1,4y,, 0•NPA11�10'PIPa1R,T/ 1 7 OS 4 m 11540/1 mNOy 7/t'.MM MM t►r. pp��E�pp�� S I 00404 WIOT1L%4 Mr Rol .2-. NUT 474' `P� WMD/mIN1 N.Tml 0 i 1161,0 M.14117!69 125.'"••• 4'N,, 4' .7; 1491•14rizr(MT !2 yJ A yp:6. a • Z ~aEl. i :_ ki R[CORDER's FEE.NO.9013/024 RLi:U11OEA'S FET_NO 3700/304 I. 111SXIXCT041 COUNTY DEED RECORDS 1 7/1911107051 COUNTY 0(50 RECORDS T Q•bA• I r 4. I RCC4RDET['S FEE Na 1005104.0.1 • W0.3140401044 C0411T1 DEED REC13000 r l '41101/6.001 010,110[P , • '.l1 7lrN1T PL 4111 PROPERTY UNE BE1Ne AAMSTED . M7•9977'-1 01Y rI U IMA.61D111 •/1n770 an•AN Pm`MN o.0. Surveyor: !, NFm 1_1��11 f sw'rWY- II'I __ _�- -__-__ ►UWR�iTwniille�iois1i• Weddle k MBOC., ZIIC. . RESTARTED 00PN0\ -,�Sy_- _-- ND1•EY11.13l.ir4 1750 SR Skyline Blvd. CON113001Z15 01.7.10„ ,0As' 13(T II TNT 11RY[7 i suite 105 11.51• J A / S4r01'N'r 1r 7.17• 2y. �•�1R,,11/1.„�p5 Portland, OR 97221-2544 0 0051.3111 0••+'se. a».,V1017 N r_1/.•1.•V IV[ (503) 292-8083 tug Esixl*N51 'Or Mons"°.iS4 pu I-888-222-8083 r L AC,Al5TE0 PTLCtPE7RY UNE Fax: (503) 292-0938 URI pp Yac41 MERLN COUNTY q r RECORDER'S RC N70.x2011045.7 WRY(YON'a 0 I f ICE FW1D 11U1/r(nu Rea •ASNINCTONI COLISOIV DEED RECORDS PICF 11R:D_1-5•011 -z` 011 711199 RJ[115 CAP 0(1111(7D /OA FILING WAIm•0411 0315'P11 _.__t. ..51._ MAY OR 21041(•71 N WWII,'M 6.1' JOG 1411190R 700/1061 5 LeJ • • ENGINEERING • PLANNING SURVEYING FORESTAY • • • i ` • 13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 100 TELEPHX ONE( 8 AK FA (503)503)925-896925 9 799• Sherwood,Oregon 97140 A''NC/N!BRINC&J'DRF.57'Y • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION • A tract of land located ih the NW1/4 of Section 13, Township 2 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at a point which bears S87°14'51"E 1585.23 feet from the northwest corner of said Section 13, said point being a 5/8"iron rod located on the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road(County Road A-130);thence S87°31'58"T 143.08 feet along said right-of-way line to a 5/8"iron rod; thence along a curve to the right,whose radius is 537.96 feet, whose length is 217.60 feet, and whose chord bears S75°56'42"E 216.12 feet to a 5/8".iron rod; thence S01°25'11"W 276.29 feet to a 5/8"iron rod located in•a 1-1/4"iron pipe;thence N88°36'44"W 353.12 feet to a 1-1/4"iron pipe; thence N01°16'29"E 326.38 feet to the point of beginning. • • . • The above described tract of land contains 2.42 acres,more or less. • • • • • • • • RECEIVED • MAY 2 3 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Nicoli Engineering , Inc. lit PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 May 23, 2001 NEI#: 99-0904 RECEIVED PLANNING City of Tigard MAY 2 5 2001 ATTN: Sherman Casper Qtp(QFTtGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Jackson Business Center, Building Addition 7910 & 7800 SW Durham Road Tigard, OR 97223 SDP: 2000-00016 Dear Mr. Casper: Thank you for the status report for the above noted project. Following are our responses, which correspond to the numbered items found in your status report: 9. I understand that Harris-McMonagle has prepared documents for the street/signal work on SW Durham Road and for obtaining the necessary permits. These documents have been submitted to the City and returned to the engineer for corrections and signalization coordination (ENG2001-00008). This process is moving forward but appears this issue may take some time to resolve. We would ask that this condition be made a condition to be resolved prior to final inspection. The owner is proceeding this requirement and this request would allow work to begin during the prime construction season and also allow him to meet financial obligations to the lending institution. 10. The legal name is Metzger Ventures, L.L.C. 12 At this time, tenant/tenants for the project have not been determine d/:.dentifierl The suite layout is unable to be determined. This condition cannot be met at this time. 13. The removal of the second existing driveway to the previous residence has been noted to be closed on the submitted documents. Also, the submitted documents by Harris-McMonagle note that this driveway is to be removed. MI S2000-00018: The survey (by Weddle and Associates, Inc.) for this requirement has been completed and recorded with Washington County. A reduced copy of this survey has been attached for your review. X U-9909045Letters\Status Report Response doc Nicoli Engineering , Inc. PO Box 23784 Tigard, Oregon 97281 • Phone: (503) 620-2086 • Fax: (503) 684-3636 It should be noted that Mr. Metzger has been direct by his lending institution to combine tax lots 200 and 300. The consolidation is in progress and should be submitted to the County for review within days. The legal description by AKS Engineering for this consolidation has been attached for your review. 16. The conditions of approval required that the applicant shall ensure that there is a minimum of 35' of right of way at Durham Road. The attached survey by Wenddle & Associates motes the 35'-0" right of way form the centerline of Durham Road. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact our office at your convenience. Sincerely, James Andrews, Project Manager jda/hmb enclosures cc: ._ Brian Regger X:U-9909041LetterslStatus Report Response doc