Loading...
SDR2001-00009 EXPIRED SDR2001 - 00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH • 'NOM Of VI' OWSION TE" ' ' CITY OF TIOARD .. ...a..rnr.,., 120 DAYS = 12/19/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00009 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. OWNER: Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum, Trustee APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky 21390 SW Edy Road Majestic Homes, Inc. Sherwood, OR 97140 PO Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION is ereby given , -gacd commtmitY APPROVED the tt*Ob :certai °! cones on which the€ is based are noted hi NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 1 OF28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1. Provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. 2. Provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. 3. Provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree no less than 2 inches in diameter, planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. 4. Address one of the 4 methods of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclable storage standard and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. 5. Provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 6. Provide a plan showing a minimum 24 feet of isle width between the proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. 7. Provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. 8. Provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. 9. Provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. 10. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. 11. Provide an exterior lighting plan for review and approval by the Planning Division and the Tigard Police Department. THE FQ L 3.. i NG CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED P1 ,=tJ41 ISSUANCE OF nig SITE:;:PERMIT: Submit to the Engineenng •epartment (Brian Rager, 639 4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 2 OF 28 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Pacific Highway and the Highway 217 off ramp. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have met ODOT requirements for onsite detention of the private storm water system. 17. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00- 7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING O IT NS .PRIOR FINAL out " , ., ..,�. Submit to the Engineering Department rian Rager, • • , exf. 3 8) or review and approval: 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 19. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall obtain approval from ODOT for any work done in their ROW, including the sewer connection work in SW Pacific Highway and the private storm drainage outfall construction. 20. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. S s & .A " 1.24,4 R ti ,1t, _ ? ., SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with an office building that was previously occupied by a veterinary clinic. The previous property owner filed Variance 88-32 and Sign Code Exception 88-05 concerning the height and size of a proposed sign and related structures. Conditional Use approval was given through CUP96-0010 on September 5t , 1996 to develop a 130-foot-tall cellular communications monople tower and an associated equipment structure. A variance was also approved to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway. Vicinity Information: The north side of the site is adjoined by a frontage road that provides access to the property from SW Pacific Highway and is part of the State Highway right-of-way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east, the property is adjoined by the Costco Store. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 3 OF 28 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Tigard Triangle Design Standards (18.620) Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18. 705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) D. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 F. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zoning district. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 17,482 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 164 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard Oft[6] Oft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[3] 11 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 120 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Maximum Height 45 ft >45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 43% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 57% NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 4 OF 28 As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the CG zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. B. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be ranted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standar s) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not significantly detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the roposed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 5 OF 28 The subject site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. According to the Tigard Triangle Street Plan (page 18.620-13) of the Tigard Development Code, the distance between the ODOT frontage road, which the project takes access from, and SW Dartmouth is 589 feet and so an additional north/south connection is not warranted according to the Design Option. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. The proposed building site has 164 feet of frontage onto a private drive that connects to SW Pacific Highway. The private accessway is not considered an arterial. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 0 to 7 feet from the existing right-of-way from which the project takes access from. Therefore, this standard has been met. Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a p ublic street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The site plan indicates that landscaping will be provided from the proposed carwash to the ODOT accessway from which the site will take access. The landscaping plan shows 42 Photina's (vertical shrubbery) planted within the landscaped area, which achieves the effect of the L-2 landscaping standard. Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plan does not show a walkway connection from the proposed carwash to the existing ODOT accessway. Therefore, the applicant shall submit a plan showing a walkway connection from the carwash to the existing accessway. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If-located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 6 OF 28 Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The proposed parking lot associated with this project is located to the rear of the carwash and is screened to an L-2 landscape standard with a combination of groundcover (Kinickinick) and vertical shrubbery (Cottoneaster). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum, 50 percent of the street facing, ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The applicant has submitted elevation drawings that indicate that 60% of the ground floor wall area on the north side of the building that abuts the ODOT access drive will be windows. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The north façade facing SW Pacific Highway is approximately 90 feet in length, which requires 1 architectural feature according to the standard above. The applicant's plans call for (2), 2-foot offsets along the north façade that faces SW Pacific Highway. The applicant also proposes to construct a 2 x 2-foot-wide planter to extend 55'lz feet along the front facade of the proposed carwash. Therefore, this standard has been met. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show 1 entrance into the building at the northwest end of the building. Plans show the main entrance under a covered portico area. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be a combination of brick, special ground colored CMU and stucco. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 7 OF 28 Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. No roof mounted equipment is proposed. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. This standard will be addressed when the applicant applies for sign permits. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen.): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. 'Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. rees shall be provided at a minimum 21/2-inch caliper, at a maximum spacing. of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 8 OF 28 L-1 and L-2 landscaping has been addressed above under Section 18.620.030.A.5 (Parking Location And Landscape Design). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. C. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from the ODOT right-of-way access that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access is not proposed at this time. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site takes access from an existing ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 9 OF 28 driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete. The width of the driveway approach is approximately 30 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. • Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan does not indicate a walkway connection from the proposed building to the ODOT accessway. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this section to provide a lan showing a paved walking extending from the main entrance to the ODOT accessway: However, based on the layout of the proposed carwash, a walkway extending from the main entrance will not cross a parking area. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this section to provide a plan showing a concrete walkway extending from the main entrance to the ODOT accessway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: provides 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access. However, the applicant's site plan indicates that the access is only 20-feet wide. According to the standard, the applicant must provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 10 OF 28 One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The site plan shows the access drive to accommodate for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: . Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or . Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or . Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The location of the access drive will not create hazardous conditions. Further discussion of the access drive can be found in Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) of this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: . Provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. . Provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725): Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The proposed carwash is a permitted use within the C-G zone. The above performance standards are considered to be met; however, ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Environmental Performance Standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 11 OF 28 Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed site has approximately 164 feet of frontage on SW Pacific Highway. The Site Plan shows 4 Hornbeams to be used as street trees and planted 30 feet apart from each other at a 2-inch caliper. Therefore, this standard is met. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Properties to the east, south and west of the subject property are zoned C-G (General Commercial). The property to the north is separated by SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, no buffering is required. Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site plan shows 8 parking stalls to be provided. According to the standard above, the applicant is required to provide 1 parking lot tree for every 7 parking stalls to provide a canopy affect. The site plan does not show a parking lot tree associated with the project. However, the applicant has provided a landscaped island adjacent to the proposed ADA stall. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 12 OF 28 or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance, or provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Therefore, the applicant will be required to address one of the 4 methods of compliance and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Minimum Standards Method. Specific requirements: a.Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional 5 square feet per unit for each unit above 10. b.Non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus:1) Office: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). 2) Retail: 10 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 3) Industrial: 6 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 4) Institutional: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 5) Other: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. The proposed development consists of an automatic carwash building with a gross floor area of 2,012 square feet. Per the above specifications, the required storage area is 10 square feet + 2,012 - 4 = 18 square feet. The applicant indicates a 64 square foot area for solid waste will be provided. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior stora a areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. According to the location standards, no exterior storage area shall be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street. According to the site plan, the proposed trash enclosure is located at the southern end of the proposed parking area. which is separated from Interstate-5 with a 20-foot natural buffer and 5 feet of landscaping. The proposed location provides adequate access for collection, as well as high visibility to enhance security for users. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has indicated that the refuse container will be located within a 280 square foot enclosure. The proposed enclosure will be constructed with 6-foot, 8-inch block walls with a 20-foot-wide secure gate. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 13 OF 28 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards have not been met. CONDITION: Address one of the 4 methods of compliance and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the building, is 55 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application and is not feasible with any of the surrounding uses. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 14 OF 28 parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site plan shows the site will have a total of 8 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 parking stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan shows 1 ADA accessible parking stall located near the front entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding_ single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . The plans submitted show the parking lot to be stripped. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 15 OF 28 The applicant has not shown parking stalls to include required wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.7651 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard stalls (7.5 x 18.5). However, the proposed aisle width does not meet the minimum 24-foot isle width. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a minimum 24-feet of isle width between proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a "Motor Vehicle Servicing" use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building (2,012 square feet) is required to provide a 2 stall bicycle rack. The site plan shows a 3 stall bicycle rack located 75 feet from the northern entrance. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant is required to provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 16 OF 28 As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle parking requirement for a motor vehicle service use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposed building will be 2,012 square feet, requiring a minimum of 2 bicycle parking stalls. The site plan shows a 3 stall bicycle rack. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0 and the maximum is 2.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on 2,012 square feet of carwash, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces. The plans provide a total of 8 parking spaces. However, the applicant indicates on the site plan that the parking spaces will be used as vacuum stalls. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed carwash will be a total of 2,012 square feet. Therefore, no loading spaces are required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. • Provide a plan showing a minimum 24-feet of isle width between the proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. • Provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. • Provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. • Provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 17 OF 28 Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the criterion above, the applicant is required to provide an arborist report for the planting, removal and protection of trees associated with the site development review. The applicant has indicated that (1) tree over 12-inches in caliper will be removed and trees to be saved will have protection measures erected around the drip line of the tree. However, the submitted plans indicate additional trees 12-inches or greater are to be removed. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal Standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions are shown or have been proposed within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following sections and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 18 OF 28 Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, the site is considered to be a Quatama Loam with a 3-7 percent slope. Included with this soil are areas of Aloha, Hillsboro, and Huberly soils. These soils have a slight hazard of erosion and runoff is slow. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) and building site development characteristics are Moderate Limitations. The abutting parcel to the east, is developed with a building that is no less than 100 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located on all sides of the building. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the project and has requested that an exterior lighting plan be submitted. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit an exterior lighting plan. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Southwest Pacific Highway is recognized as a transit route. The nearest bus stop is approximately 160 feet away. Therefore, no new facility is required. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for review and approval by the Planning Division and the Police Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 19 OF 28 E. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires an arterial street to have a varied width right-of-way and a varied width paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is also under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is adequate ROW adjacent to this site, and no further dedications are necessary. Access to this site has historically been taken from the existing frontage road within the ODOT ROW. The applicant's plan indicates they plan to continue use of this frontage road. The frontage road is not considered a City street, so would not need to meet a City design standard. The applicant will need to coordinate with ODOT with respect to any requirements they may have about the frontage road. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing public sidewalk along SW Pacific Highway. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Pacific Highway adjacent to this site that has ample capacity. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to the building. A permit from the City will be required for the sewer tap, and a permit from ODOT will be required to cover the roadway excavations in both SW Pacific Highway and the frontage road. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 20 OF 28 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There is an existing stormwater swale that crosses this site from the ROW areas east of the subject site. This channel will be piped under the parking area improvements proposed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant is proposing to detain the onsite storm water in a pond. This pond must be designed to meet ODOT detention standards, as the water will be discharged into ODOT ROW. The applicant understands this and has acknowledged such in their narrative. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 21 OF 28 • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are overhead utility lines along SW Pacific Highway, but they are high-capacity lines. Therefore, the applicant does not need to address this criterion. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A traffic impact report was submitted by Lancaster Engineering, dated May 2001. The report analyzed the impacts of the proposed development on the existing frontage road and frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway. The report was assembled in accordance with ODOT traffic study standards, and has been submitted to ODOT for review. Lancaster reported that this proposed development should generate approximately 200 additional trips per average weekday. The level of service (LOS) at the frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway, after this project is operational, is predicted to be LOS E during the PM peak period, with a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.45. ODOT typically considers a v/c ratio of less than 0.95 as acceptable. Therefore, the impact of this development should not create a capacity problem at that access point. Lancaster points out that since this site has been vacant for a period of time, that any new traffic from the development will be highly noticeable. They estimate that even with potential long queues building up from the SW Dartmouth Street intersection, that traffic patterns will allow significant gaps to enable vehicles to adequately enter and exit this site. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing water meters that serve the existing building. Any new proposed water services for this development will need approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 22 OF 28 The applicant's plan indicates they will treat their onsite water in a vegetated pond, prior to release into the ODOT system. Calculations and a specific planting plan for this pond must be submitted to Engineering prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review will review a detailed grading plan. The site is less than five acres in size; therefore, a NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Kittelson & Associates prepared a traffic impact report for this development, dated March 2001. Kittelson analyzed several local intersections, including: • SW 7216 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street • SW 68th Parkway/SW Dartmouth Street • SW 68th Parkway/SW Clinton Street, and • SW 68th Parkway/SW Atlanta Street. The estimated build-out year of this development would be 2002, so Kittelson reviewed the anticipated background traffic growth in the area, as well as projecting the number of trips that this development will generate. The development itself will generate approximately 455 new weekday trips. Under existing traffic volumes, the intersection at SW 68 Parkway/SW Dartmouth Street is at Level of Service (LOS) F during the PM peak period, which is considered failing. AAI other intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. The intersection at SW 72" Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street currently operates at LOS D, but has a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 1.00, which means it is operating at or near capacity now. Under 2002 background traffic projections, acceptable service levels are maintained, but the intersection of SW 72' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street will operate at a v/c of over 1.00. When considering the additional traffic from this development, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 23 OF 28 The two critical intersections, SW 68th Parkway/SW Dartmouth Street, and SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, have been identified by the City as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was the Babies R Us project. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72r' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council require the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using this same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. Kittelson's report shows that this project will generate approximately 30 PM peak hour trips to the intersection of SW 72' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 1,695 vehicles, the project impact is approximately 1.8%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $32,727.00. Likewise, the Kittelson report shows thgt the project will generate approximately 40 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of SW 68t Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. Lancaster estimates a TEV of approximately 1,995 vehicles. The impact from this development is approximately 2.0%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $26,667.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The appli9pt's plan indicates that they will make connection to the existing 12-inch main line in SW 67 Avenue. They will need to obtain plan approval from TVWD prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct an onsite detention pond for treatment and detention. The water quality volume was calculated to be approximately 1,475 cubic feet (cf). The pond volume proposed is 2,745 cf, which is more than adequate for treatment. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 24 OF 28 Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site plan review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. F. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the rojected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $2,421 based on the use proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 25 OF 28 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $7,566 ($2,421 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $5,145. However, no street improvements are required. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: An Arborist report is required since, it appears, trees will be retained onsite. The City of Tigard Advanced Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: Request lighting plan (exterior) to advent crime prevention measures. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. (UFC 903.4) 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/new construction.htm NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 26 OF 28 Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: ODOT has reviewed the traffic impact study dated May 2001 for the proposed Carbucks Car Wash. It is expected that the carwash will not generate enough traffic to significantly impact the operations of the frontage road intersection with OR 99W. No traffic mitigation is necessary. The applicant needs to obtain an access permit from the Frontage Road to the site. ODOT Permit Information (for the applicant): 1. Any work in the state-owned right-of-way will require an ODOT permit. 2. An application for an ODOT drainage permit must be completed if the site's drainage enters ODOT's right-of-way. A drainage study for the site may be required if: Total runoff entering ODOT's right-of-way is greater than 0.05 cubic meters per second, or The improvements create an increase in impervious surface area by greater than 1,000 square meters. 3. The applicant shall obtain an access permit from ODOT District 2A, at 503-229-5267 for information on the written application process. Washington County Department of Land Use has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 18, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 2, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 27 OF 28 ETHE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 1, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. .#01.111"-I / October 18, 2001 PR PA 'E D =1cT i Egger DATE Assistant Planner I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\S DR2001-00009.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 28 OF 28 1111::: CITY of TIGARD 1111111.1. 11— --= '-_ OEOOaAPMIC INFORMATION SYSTEM IIII- \ W - -.,- - -- ~ VICINITY MAP..immim am III 111E1 no 111111 _ _MM_ - SDR2001 -00009 Nm w � ► PPG\` CARBUCKS CARWASH Eir 11.1,� IIII ■r1 x iilk mr , I =- 1 tt°0 41 0 t go 1 il kIL' * ' • etc ._1 1 i . %--m 'I . ■ ra--- N V"..♦ ys %. 0 400 _ _ 600 Fut ,. ,feet NI,714 ��- '' �,lio..• Itti, City of Tigard ' , , ` tnfomutlon on this map is y . should be vented with the Development Services Division. 1 l ar,O 9 Blvd bk J ' , Tlgard,OR 97225 (503)639-4171 •. _- �. •(_ . httpJt -ci-tigard.or.us Nita. Comm unity Development Plot date:Aug 23,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR 'r V � O cn /--fr------ 7 > co LOT I v 1° AI Z (77-------------r-- ,a it 1" 40.-K )111P r j f„„„„„iiiii,ii„,,,-,,,,iii�� ip► LOT 2‘- \,..\\ ,. ,..,,,... .., ;q�l�; „!„� Q ce ,, -� iil _ . ,j ��, ., illllillt����`� I I= g C� ` . .. . Mr r z O I j O LOT 3 , ""°'?= . Oil ILI >— r f KrF.rur ��\ stdss O U ►� �� a cEU sorts < Z aiiai i►/ • 3 any •\ - -.CS- 1 LOT 4 IPOB I J CITY O F T I G A SDR200 1-00009 RD SITE PLAN N CARBUCKS CARWASH (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00009 „P> CITY OF TIGARD CARBUCKS CARWASH Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/19/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00009 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. OWNER: Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum, Trustee APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky 21390 SW Edy Road Majestic Homes, Inc. Sherwood, OR 97140 PO Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECT!''E DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 18, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 2, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 1, 2001. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. . — ,- I,I II-\ , A = j VICINITY MAP I —mMilik NI J—liz: 1:21 IN=I ∎Nie�. .A ll 1�SDR2D01-00009 I milt,-Ji ,. �IPPPP41j CARBUCKS CARWASH N. I: r I li, ,,,, ,ril , 1_,=0 ';40% - 0 wk,,to „,„ NW ■■ ... MN * III � , W e *AN ."11140111 /II PIM 4 IV" IN* t \\ / Ns PI City of TWTO MC i / da / ,M�y - ' ,/// O „G t�' J / (n .e 7 > / / ,• 0 CD 0 , , .4 , _7" 101/, Z ,' / /�14/Ay I a �� ;l7-f--,,,,' ' I'IiCiiill�I p,l�l « , 0 ;tlll ‘.- ,;,I�I1{IIIIIIIii�II,I�i;�.4 ;Ipi.i ii�li;.. a ,� _ ■ ` IiilOi I —— 0 U- ,� \ O % \ I 1.S Lo*3 >- , [�j� H 4 \ 4, u 0 z' :r-• R HE lor. ` POB \ N I I—1-- NI CITYOF TIGARD i S0112001-00009 SITE PLAN N CARBUCKS CARWASH (Map is not to scale) 0 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY TY OF TI TIGARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 23, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00009 FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH PROPOSAL: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 4, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." ? �i Remo is ■ CITY a1 T16ARD -' Na �'_.;-- -. �m_. ,I VICINITY MAP I �N, Nor iii■' • •, .■ 1. L . j ti ff ii Iii ■■ �i1 in -u=_ = �N N` ,I 11SDR2001-00009 INCCARBUCKS CARWASH,„,,,,, M ik P � 11� , I Sil • Iii 1r‘41IPS ; • Ot ii ,...,. .. , ... ; 41i .tV 01:101ft MI 1$ A ■I Cary ofTagud 1 ! ' 4PI . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS •F ' re on Department of Transportation ortation Region 1 RECEIVED PLANNING •• 123 NW Flanders / =S' John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor SEP 1 0 2001 Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 CITY OF TIGARD FAX(503)731-8259 FILE CODE: September 6, 2001 PLA9-1-2A -91 ODOT Case No: 1216 W Tigard, City of Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner Subject: SDR2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash OR 99W Pacific Highway West and OR 217 Dear Mr. Scheidegger: We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru car wash facility. We have no objections provided that the mitigation measures outlined below are imposed as conditions of approval. The site is adjacent to OR 99W (Pacific Highway West). According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999)1 OR 99W is classified as a Statewide Urban highway. The posted speed in this section is 40 miles per hour. Based on this speed and classification, the access spacing standard is 990 ft. The mobility standard is 99 volume to capacity (v/c). ODOT has permitting authority for this facility2 and an interest in ensuring that this proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. ODOT has reviewed the traffic impact study dated May 2001 for the proposed Carbucks Car Wash. It is expected that the carwash will not generate enough traffic to significantly impact the operations of the frontage road intersection with OR 99W. No traffic mitigation is necessary. The applicant needs to obtain an access permit from the Frontage Road to the site. 1 The 1999 Oregon Highway Plan is an element of the Oregon Transportation Plan,which was adopted by the Oregon Transportation Commission on March 18, 1999. 2 Oregon Administrative Rule(OAR)734-051,see the following web site for the rule's exact language: htto://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS 700/OAR 734/734 051.html Form 734-1850(1/98) ODOT Permit Information (for the applicant): 1 . Any work in the state-owned right-of-way will require an ODOT permit.3 2. An application for an ODOT drainage permit must be completed if the site's drainage enters ODOT's right-of-way4. A drainage study for the site may be required if: Total runoff entering ODOT's right-of-way is greater than 0.05 cubic meters per second, or The improvements create an increase in impervious surface area by greater than 1 ,000 square meters. 3. The applicant shall be obtain an access permit from ODOT District 2A. Contact Joel McCarroll, Assistant District Manager, ODOT District 2A, at 503.229.5267 for information on the written application process. Thank you for coordinating with ODOT on this land use application. Please provide us with a copy of the Notice of Decision and Final Report. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 503.731.8534. Sincerel , i,di I A --7 Timothy i . .n, AICP Development Review Cc: Chi Mai, ODOT Joel McCarroll, ODOT 3 OAR 734-055 4 OAR 734-051-0160 SEP-11 01 01:45 FROM:WASHCO LAND DEL) SERV 503-846-2908 TO:5036847297 PAGE:02/02 AIN WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation,Lard Development Services 155 8 First Avenue.Suite 350-13,Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 ( (503))846 6-887661 . FAX:(503)846-2908 September 11, 2001 Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: 503-684-7297 # of Pages: 1 RE: Carbuck's Carwash City File Number: SDR 2001-00009 Location: Hwy. 217 / 99W Tax Map and Lot Number: 15136CCO2100 \\ .ti j II L. ■ ( i iN .'N'': .'''''j I \ �� \\�-,• Jbru Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has received materials regarding the above noted development application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not adjacent to County maintained road sections nor is it part of a phased development for which previously required County conditions remain unsatisfied. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-8131 Anne LaMoun in Associate Planner F\Shared\LOS\WPSHARE\TRANSP\TIG\Carbuck'sNOCOMM doc A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIOARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager AUG 31 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3171 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ()w}o 1344";-C - &44-Y ZU)a ;c Ain !Ri 44 L 44. ce;.✓ r-r e4c79 t�`f'��y� f s,.�� --�-- •�r_� oc. (lc ase pnrvi4e thefolTowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I ,1�f1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY LD Community(Deve(oprnent Shaping Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer S E P 0 5 2001 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SRI 2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1 ( Q0k9 tsk \k ,n OM\ Q,l.�Cw4 tor) a01J oA ►`IVw (T&ase provide thefoc2"owing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: 6. \t,)o\ !Phone Number(s): -. 1)VO REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY O IIGARD Community'Development ShapingA(Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Operations Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031 639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. y Written comments provided below: 44 4gtoktsr REPO r, tLEau.rRGA SrA)CF tr APPEAI.S� fkFn w+w 3E R�Ttriiv�d MS r tF, (t'fease provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Barbara Shields,Long Range Planning Manager AUG 3 0 2001 CITY OF TkGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3171 Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (PCease provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A(Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Aitrjohn Roy,Property Manager/Operations Department AUG 2 4 2001 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x311) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. P.LE SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: h proposal and have no objections have reviewed the p opo �ections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ('lease provide the foltoudng information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I IPhone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OFTIGSRD CQ►ninunity cDeveCopment Shaping A Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 1 C'g2,ow) tee Walker,CleanWaterServices/SWM Program T n T, I \I fll l -nee `i O City of Tigard Planning Uivislon AUG 2 20 a1 II ; STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3171 Phon; L I '131684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORT 2001-00009 > CARRUCKS CARWASH Q REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility, The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. if you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6. 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA3,0 C tJFFECG;+THEfOLIO11,1 ,'G0M$$,<T,kLIT�i�ib►PP;LY�:;yg1i ,�, � t i II, •N ,nli 6'IS We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. - Written comments provided below: w cam' (Please Fnuvide the foQolving information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): EN 10 E4. 4 i00j AI S3DI.12i3S 2F3L�'�1 V3'IO — —— - SZSC O69 COS rid 90.90 TO/OZ/60 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: October 12, 2001 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer --/- RE: SDR 2001-00009, Carbucks Carwash Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires an arterial street to have a varied width right-of-way and a varied width paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is also under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is adequate ROW adjacent to this site, and no further dedications are necessary. Access to this site has historically been taken from the existing frontage road within the ODOT ROW. The applicant's plan indicates they plan to continue use of this frontage road. The frontage road is not considered a City street, so would not need to meet a City design standard. The applicant will need to coordinate ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 1 with ODOT with respect to any requirements they may have about the frontage road. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing public sidewalk along SW Pacific Highway. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Pacific Highway adjacent to this site that has ample capacity. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to the building. A permit from the City will be required for the sewer tap, and a permit from ODOT will be required to cover the roadway excavations in both SW Pacific Highway and the frontage road. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 2 There is an existing stormwater swale that crosses this site from the ROW areas east of the subject site. This channel will be piped under the parking area improvements proposed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant is proposing to detain the onsite storm water in a pond. This pond must be designed to meet ODOT detention standards, as the water will be discharged into ODOT ROW. The applicant understands this and has acknowledged such in their narrative. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. PLANNING Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. PLANNING Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. PLANNING Utilities: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 3 Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are overhead utility lines along SW Pacific Highway, but they are high- capacity lines. Therefore, the applicant does not need to address this criterion. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A traffic impact report was submitted by Lancaster Engineering, dated May 2001. The report analyzed the impacts of the proposed development on the existing frontage road and frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway. The report was ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 4 assembled in accordance with ODOT traffic study standards, and has been submitted to ODOT for review. Lancaster reported that this proposed development should generate approximately 200 additional trips per average weekday. The level of service (LOS) at the frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway, after this project is operational, is predicted to be LOS E during the PM peak period, with a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.45. ODOT typically considers a v/c ratio of less than 0.95 as acceptable. Therefore, the impact of this development should not create a capacity problem at that access point. Lancaster points out that since this site has been vacant for a period of time, that any new traffic from the development will be highly noticeable. They estimate that even with potential long queues building up from the SW Dartmouth Street intersection, that traffic patterns will allow significant gaps to enable vehicles to adequately enter and exit this site. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing water meters that serve the existing building. Any new proposed water services for this development will need approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates they will treat their onsite water in a vegetated pond, prior to release into the ODOT system. Calculations and a specific planting plan for this pond must be submitted to Engineering prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 5 with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review will review a detailed grading plan. The site is less than five acres in size; therefore, a NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 6 Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap.. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of- way of SW Pacific Highway and the Highway 217 off ramp. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have met ODOT requirements for onsite detention of the private storm water system. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 7 Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall obtain approval from ODOT for any work done in their ROW, including the sewer connection work in SW Pacific Highway and the private storm drainage outfall construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \eng\bnanr\comments\sdr\sdr2001-00009.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00009 Carbucks Carwash PAGE 8 4I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT60, 41I 1 ARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: August 23,2001 JAN 1 5 2002 TO: Can Lamella,Building Official CITY CIF TiGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x317) Phone: [503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide thefol&owing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I •DATE: October 15, LuO1 PLANS CHECK NO SDR2001-00009 PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE CARBUCKS CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE TAX MAP NO. LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP SITES NO ADDRESS: 11744 Pacific Hwy RESIDENTIAL $ 226.00 X BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $ 207.00 Estimated TIF INDUSTRIAL $ 217.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) INSTITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG TRIP WEEKEND AVG TRIP RATE 814 Specialty Retail RATE 40.68 BASIS: Applicant proposes construction of a new 2,012 sq. ft. car wash. A 968 sq. ft. building currently use as veterinarian will be demolished. CALCULATIONS: TIF = Avg. trips X T.G.S.F. X Trip rate 40.68 X 2.012 40.68 X .968 $2,421 42.47 X $57 Transit AMT $714 = 42 X $17 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 42 FEE $2,421 ADDITIONAL NOTES: FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY 39 trips credits assumed for Demo 968 ft Veterinarian use. ROAD AMT. $1,707 Car wash Trip rate Not Available, Specialty Retail rate assumed TRANSIT AMT $714 TIF without credits = $4,665 PREPARED BY S.S. Casper :TI FWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF I(iARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: August 23,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: (503)639-417/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2001-00009 s> CARBUCKS CARWASH REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR Col :NTS • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.:'P. 2-_e ('T '' FILE NAME: - / ,,,,, i..:_ CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central East ['South ❑West RIProposal Descrip. in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES 'LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs ("POLICE DEPT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer !/BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official r�CENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer it-WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder Y. PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine.Urban Forester ✓PLANNER-TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! SPECIAL DISTRICTS TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*J-TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE ♦ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* LEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office ee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 55 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,oevetopment Setrices PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM ill` 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _ _ US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 —CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Reginnal Planner(wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedrnes o Area) _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planting Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) Ai ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGuRe) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) tyr�/Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGA/URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(CPazcn,msl4 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS is Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)Ms 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES —PORTLAND WESTERN RJR,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE ,,r_TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Witfun%Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 —AT&T CABLE lone.Ewn,ivn.or99w) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 13-Aug-01) MAILING RECORDS AL. 4 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ` CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping)1 Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsford,, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Chet Approp ate Box(s)Bebw; © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) Z City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on October 18,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on October 18,2001, postage prepaid. ; Alta/iV, (Person that : epared"Notice SZ F± OAF o Go.7V ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard- Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , 2001. OFFICIAL SEAL • aANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MY cOMMISMMI SIGN EXPIRES SSION NO. SEPT,326578 p7 203 NOTARY MU OF ORE!O My Commission UM* 77/43 �I�7 t , EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00009 ! " �_�J. CITY OF TIGARD CARBUCKS CARWASH Community Deve(opment Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/19/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00009 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. OWNER: Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum, Trustee APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky 21390 SW Edy Road Majestic Homes, Inc. Sherwood, OR 97140 PO Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. • NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 1 OF 28 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1. Provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. 2. Provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. 3. Provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree no less than 2 inches in diameter, planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. 4. Address one of the 4 methods of compliance with the mixed solid waste and recyclable storage standard and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. 5. Provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. 6. Provide a plan showing a minimum 24 feet of isle width between the proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. 7. Provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. 8. Provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. 9. Provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. 10. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. 11. Provide an exterior lighting plan for review and approval by the Planning Division and the Tigard Police Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover the sanitary sewer tap. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 2 OF 28 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of-way of SW Pacific Highway and the Highway 217 off ramp. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have met ODOT requirements for onsite detention of the private storm water system. 17. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00- 7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 19. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall obtain approval from ODOT for any work done in their ROW, including the sewer connection work in SW Pacific Highway and the private storm drainage outfall construction. 20. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with an office building that was previously occupied by a veterinary clinic. The previous property owner filed Variance 88-32 and Sign Code Exception 88-05 concerning the height and size of a proposed sign and related structures. Conditional Use approval was given through CUP96-0010 on September 5t , 1996 to develop a 130-foot-tall cellular communications monople tower and an associated equipment structure. A variance was also approved to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway. Vicinity Information: The north side of the site is adjoined by a frontage road that provides access to the property from SW Pacific Highway and is part of the State Highway right-of-way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east, the property is adjoined by the Costco Store. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 3 OF 28 SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Tigard Triangle Design Standards (18.620) Street Connectivity Site Design Standards Building Design Standards Signs Landscaping and Screening C. Applicable Development Code Standards 18. 705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) D. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 E. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 F. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zoning district. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 17,482 sq.ft. -Detached unit -Boarding,lodging,rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 164 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 0 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - -Side yard 0/20 ft[3] 11 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 120 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Maximum Height 45 ft >45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 43% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 57% NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 4 OF 28 As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the CG zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. B. TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS (18.620): Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle. These design standards address several important guiding principals adopted for the Tigard Triangle, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. All new developments are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the Development and Building Codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve ublic streets, connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Tigard Triangle. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the Development Code, standards in this section shall govern. The criteria may be adjusted if the adjustment approval criteria, which are found in Section 18.620.090.C.1-4, have been met. The criteria provides that an adjustment may be ranted if granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standards) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and the proposal will not si nificantl detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character the area; and if more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site; and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practicable. Street Connectivity: All development must demonstrate how one (1) of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.134 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. Design Option: a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight (8) street intersections per mile; b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 5 OF 28 The subject site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway. According to the Tigard Triangle Street Plan (page 18.620-13) of the Tigard Development Code, the distance between the ODOT frontage road, which the project takes access from, and SW Dartmouth is 589 feet and so an additional north/south connection is not warranted according to the Design Option. Site Design Standards: All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one (1) acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010C2 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Building Placement On Major And Minor Arterials And The Street: Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50 percent of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. The proposed building site has 164 feet of frontage onto a private drive that connects to SW Pacific Highway. The private accessway is not considered an arterial. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Building Setback: The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features, shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. The proposed building is 0 to 7 feet from the existing right-of-way from which the project takes access from. Therefore, this standard has been met. Front Yard Setback Design: Landscaping,ing, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided a structure and a p ublic street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one (1) street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L-1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The site plan indicates that landscaping will be provided from the proposed carwash to the ODOT accessway from which the site will take access. The landscaping plan shows 42 Photina's (vertical shrubbery) planted within the landscaped area, which achieves the effect of the L-2 landscaping standard. Walkway Connection To Building Entrances: A walkway connection is required between the building's entrance and the public street or accessway providing access to the property. This walkway must be at least six (6) feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.620.070. The applicant's plan does not show a walkway connection from the proposed carwash to the existing ODOT accessway. Therefore, the applicant shall submit a plan showing a walkway connection from the carwash to the existing accessway. Parking Location And Landscape Design: Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. It-located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 6 OF 28 Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 Landscape Standard except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1' Landscape Standard. The proposed parking lot associated with this project is located to the rear of the carwash and is screened to an L-2 landscape standard with a combination of groundcover (Kinickinick) and vertical shrubbery (Cottoneaster). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Building Design Standards: All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 (Criteria for Granting a Variance) is satisfied. Ground Floor Windows: All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50 percent of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three (3) feet above grade to nine (9) feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50 percent of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. According to the standard above, the building must have at a minimum, 50 percent of the street facing, ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The applicant has submitted elevation drawings that indicate that 60% of the ground floor wall area on the north side of the building that abuts the ODOT access drive will be windows. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Building Facades: Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one (1) of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1-foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. The north façade facing SW Pacific Highway is approximately 90 feet in length, which requires 1 architectural feature according to the standard above. The applicant's plans call for (2), 2-foot offsets along the north façade that faces SW Pacific Highway. The applicant also proposes to construct a 2 x 2-foot-wide planter to extend 55'lz feet along the front façade of the proposed carwash. Therefore, this standard has been met. Weather Protection: Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be backlit. The plans show 1 entrance into the building at the northwest end of the building. Plans show the main entrance under a covered portico area. Building Materials: Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet pressboard or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. The building will be a combination of brick, special ground colored CMU and stucco. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 7 OF 28 Roofs And Roof Lines: Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The proposed building does not have a false front or false roof. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. No roof mounted equipment is proposed. Signs: In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code, the following standards shall be met: Zoning District Regulations: Non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone (18.780.130.D). Sign Area Limits: The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Height Limits: The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. Sign Location: Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. This standard will be addressed when the applicant applies for sign permits. Landscaping and Screening: Two (2) levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. L-1 (Low Screen): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. 'Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial, trees shall be planted at 31/2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a 3-foot high screen and a 90 percent opacity within one (1) year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. L-2 (General Landscaping): For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2'/2-inch caliper, at a maximum spacing, of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two (2) years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 8 OF 28 L-1 and L-2 landscaping has been addressed above under Section 18.620.030.A.5 (Parking Location And Landscape Design). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Design standards have not been fully met. C. ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from the ODOT right-of-way access that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Joint access is not proposed at this time. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site takes access from an existing ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 9 OF 28 • driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete. The width of the driveway approach is approximately 30 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan does not indicate a walkway connection from the proposed building to the ODOT accessway. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this section to provide a plan showing a paved walking extending from the main entrance to the ODOT accessway. However, based on the layout of the proposed carwash, a walkway extending from the main entrance will not cross a parking area. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this section to provide a plan showing a concrete walkway extending from the main entrance to the ODOT accessway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access. However, the applicant's site plan indicates that the access is only 20-feet wide. According to the standard, the applicant must provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 10 OF 28 One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The site plan shows the access drive to accommodate for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The location of the access drive will not create hazardous conditions. Further discussion of the access drive can be found in Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) of this decision. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing a paved walkway connection to the ODOT accessway that connects to SW Pacific Highway. • Provide a 24-foot-wide access to accommodate for two-way traffic. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725): Requires that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards regulates: Noise, visible emissions, vibration and odors. The proposed carwash is a permitted use within the C-G zone. The above performance standards are considered to be met; however, ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Environmental Performance Standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 11 OF 28 Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed site has approximately 164 feet of frontage on SW Pacific Highway. The Site Plan shows 4 Hornbeams to be used as street trees and planted 30 feet apart from each other at a 2-inch caliper. Therefore, this standard is met. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Properties to the east, south and west of the subject property are zoned C-G (General Commercial). The property to the north is separated by SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, no buffering is required. Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The site plan shows 8 parking stalls to be provided. According to the standard above, the applicant is required to provide 1 parking lot tree for every 7 parking stalls to provide a canopy affect. The site plan does not show a parking lot tree associated with the project. However, the applicant has provided a landscaped island adjacent to the proposed ADA stall. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a plan showing 1 parking lot tree planted within the landscape island south of the ADA parking stall. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 12 OF 28 or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the 4 methods will be used to demonstrate compliance, or provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Therefore, the applicant will be required to address one of the 4 methods of compliance and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Minimum Standards Method. Specific requirements: a.Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional 5 square feet per unit for each unit above 10. b.Non-residential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus:1) Office: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). 2) Retail: 10 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 3) Industrial: 6 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 4) Institutional: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. 5) Other: 4 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. The proposed development consists of an automatic carwash building with a gross floor area of 2,012 square feet. Per the above specifications, the required storage area is 10 square feet + 2,012 ± 4 = 18 square feet. The applicant indicates a 64 square foot area for solid waste will be provided. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. According to the location standards, no exterior storage area shall be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street. According to the site plan, the proposed trash enclosure is located at the southern end of the proposed parking area. which is separated from Interstate-5 with a 20-foot natural buffer and 5 feet of landscaping. The proposed location provides adequate access for collection, as well as high visibility to enhance security for users. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has indicated that the refuse container will be located within a 280 square foot enclosure. The proposed enclosure will be constructed with 6-foot, 8-inch block walls with a 20-foot-wide secure gate. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 13 OF 28 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Staff finds that the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage standards have not been met. CONDITION: Address one of the 4 methods of compliance and provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the building, is 55 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application and is not feasible with any of the surrounding uses. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 14 OF 28 parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site plan shows the site will have a total of 8 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 parking stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan shows 1 ADA accessible parking stall located near the front entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this standard has been met. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . The plans submitted show the parking lot to be stripped. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 15 OF 28 The applicant has not shown parking stalls to include required wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard stalls (7.5 x 18.5). However, the proposed aisle width does not meet the minimum 24-foot isle width. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing a minimum 24-feet of isle width between proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a "Motor Vehicle Servicing" use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed building (2,012 square feet) is required to provide a 2 stall bicycle rack. The site plan shows a 3 stall bicycle rack located 75 feet from the northern entrance. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant is required to provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 16 OF 28 As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle parking requirement for a motor vehicle service use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The proposed building will be 2,012 square feet, requiring a minimum of 2 bicycle parking stalls. The site plan shows a 3 stall bicycle rack. Therefore, this standard has been met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0 and the maximum is 2.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on 2,012 square feet of carwash, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces. The plans provide a total of 8 parking spaces. However, the applicant indicates on the site plan that the parking spaces will be used as vacuum stalls. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed carwash will be a total of 2,012 square feet. Therefore, no loading spaces are required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing wheel stops constructed on all parking stalls adjacent to the interior sidewalk. • Provide a plan showing a minimum 24-feet of isle width between the proposed parking stalls and the edge of the parking lot. • Provide a plan showing the proposed bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. • Provide a detail of the bicycle rack to be used according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. • Provide a plan showing at least 4 parking stalls and no more than 5 parking stalls dedicated to customer/employee parking. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.0 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G Zoning District. No signs have been formally proposed. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 17 OF 28 Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. According to the criterion above, the applicant is required to provide an arborist report for the planting, removal and protection of trees associated with the site development review. The applicant has indicated that (1) tree over 12-inches in caliper will be removed and trees to be saved will have protection measures erected around the drip line of the tree. However, the submitted plans indicate additional trees 12-inches or greater are to be removed. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Tree Removal Standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan prepared by a certified arborist to be reviewed and approved by the City of Tigard Planning Division and the City's Arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall- contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions are shown or have been proposed within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following sections and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 18 OF 28 • Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, the site is considered to be a Quatama Loam with a 3-7 percent slope. Included with this soil are areas of Aloha, Hillsboro, and Huberly soils. These soils have a slight hazard of erosion and runoff is slow. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards) and building site development characteristics are Moderate Limitations. The abutting parcel to the east, is developed with a building that is no less than 100 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located on all sides of the building. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the project and has requested that an exterior lighting plan be submitted. Therefore, the applicant will be required to submit an exterior lighting plan. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. Southwest Pacific Highway is recognized as a transit route. The nearest bus stop is approximately 160 feet away. Therefore, no new facility is required. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. CONDITION:The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting plan for review and approval by the Planning Division and the Police Department. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 19 OF 28 • E. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires an arterial street to have a varied width right-of-way and a varied width paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Pacific Highway, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. This roadway is also under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is adequate ROW adjacent to this site, and no further dedications are necessary. Access to this site has historically been taken from the existing frontage road within the ODOT ROW. The applicant's plan indicates they plan to continue use of this frontage road. The frontage road is not considered a City street, so would not need to meet a City design standard. The applicant will need to coordinate with ODOT with respect to any requirements they may have about the frontage road. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. There is an existing public sidewalk along SW Pacific Highway. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Pacific Highway adjacent to this site that has ample capacity. The applicant's plan shows they will tap the main line and extend a new service lateral to the building. A permit from the City will be required for the sewer tap, and a permit from ODOT will be required to cover the roadway excavations in both SW Pacific Highway and the frontage road. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 20 OF 28 Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There is an existing stormwater swale that crosses this site from the ROW areas east of the subject site. This channel will be piped under the parking area improvements proposed on this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The applicant is proposing to detain the onsite storm water in a pond. This pond must be designed to meet ODOT detention standards, as the water will be discharged into ODOT ROW. The applicant understands this and has acknowledged such in their narrative. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 21 OF 28 • • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are overhead utility lines along SW Pacific Highway, but they are high-capacity lines. Therefore, the applicant does not need to address this criterion. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A traffic impact report was submitted by Lancaster Engineering, dated May 2001. The report analyzed the impacts of the proposed development on the existing frontage road and frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway. The report was assembled in accordance with ODOT traffic study standards, and has been submitted to ODOT for review. Lancaster reported that this proposed development should generate approximately 200 additional trips per average weekday. The level of service (LOS) at the frontage road access to SW Pacific Highway, after this project is operational, is predicted to be LOS E during the PM peak period, with a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.45. ODOT typically considers a v/c ratio of less than 0.95 as acceptable. Therefore, the impact of this development should not create a capacity problem at that access point. Lancaster points out that since this site has been vacant for a period of time, that any new traffic from the development will be highly noticeable. They estimate that even with potential long queues building up from the SW Dartmouth Street intersection, that traffic patterns will allow significant gaps to enable vehicles to adequately enter and exit this site. Public Water System: This site is located within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. There are existing water meters that serve the existing building. Any new proposed water services for this development will need approval from TVWD. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 22 OF 28 The applicant's plan indicates they will treat their onsite water in a vegetated pond, prior to release into the ODOT system. Calculations and a specific planting plan for this pond must be submitted to Engineering prior to construction. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. The Building Division, as a part of the site permit review will review a detailed grading plan. The site is less than five acres in size; therefore, a NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Kittelson & Associates prepared a traffic impact report for this development, dated March 2001. Kittelson analyzed several local intersections, including: • SW 721d Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street • SW 68th Parkway/SW Dartmouth Street • SW 68th Parkway/SW Clinton Street, and • SW 68th Parkway/SW Atlanta Street. The estimated build-out year of this development would be 2002, so Kittelson reviewed the anticipated background traffic growth in the area, as well as projecting the number of trips that this development will generate. The development itself will generate approximately 455 new weekday trips. Under existing traffic volumes, the intersection at SW 68' Dartmouth Street is at Level of Service (LOS) F during the PM peak period, which is considered failing. AJI other intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. The intersection at SW 72n Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street currently operates at LOS D, but has a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 1.00, which means it is operating at or near capacity now. Under 2002 background traffic projections, acceptable service levels are maintained, but the intersection of SW 72' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street will operate at a v/c of over 1.00. When considering the additional traffic from this development, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 23 OF 28 • The two critical intersections, SW 68th Parkway/SW Dartmouth Street, and SW 72nd Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, have been identified by the City as needing traffic signals. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future signal installation. The first project to contribute funds to the intersections was the Babies R Us project. A simple formula was established based upon the impact from that development. That project had an impact of 1.1% at SW 72r' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street during the PM peak hour. For that impact, the City Council require the developer to pay funds in the amount of $20,000.00. At the intersection of SW 68 Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street, the impact from that project was estimated to be 0.75%. For this impact, the developer was required to pay $10,000.00. Using this same rationale, a proportionate share has been calculated for other projects in the Triangle, and can be calculated for this project. Kittelson's report shows that this project will generate approximately 30 PM peak hour trips to the intersection of SW 72' Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. With a total entering volume (TEV) of 1,695 vehicles, the project impact is approximately 1.8%. Therefore, based on simple proportions, the project contribution to this intersection is $32,727.00. Likewise, the Kittelson report shows thgt the project will generate approximately 40 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of SW 68t Avenue/SW Dartmouth Street. Lancaster estimates a TEV of approximately 1,995 vehicles. The impact from this development is approximately 2.0%. Therefore, based on the same proportion used in the Babies R Us development, the project contribution to this intersection is $26,667.00. Funds for both intersections must be paid to the City prior to a final building inspection. Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The applicant's plan indicates that they will make connection to the existing 12-inch main line in SW 67 Avenue. They will need to obtain plan approval from TVWD prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plans indicate they will construct an onsite detention pond for treatment and detention. The water quality volume was calculated to be approximately 1,475 cubic feet (cf). The pond volume proposed is 2,745 cf, which is more than adequate for treatment. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 24 OF 28 Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Building Division as a part of the site plan review. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The City is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the City's permit tracking system. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, this building will be a multi-tenant building. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide a suite layout map so suite numbers can be assigned. The addressing fee will then be calculated based upon the number of suites that must be addressed. In multi-level structures, ground level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "1", second level suites shall have numbers preceded by a "2", etc. F. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $2,421 based on the use proposed. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 25 OF 28 Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $7,566 ($2,421 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $5,145. However, no street improvements are required. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • An Arborist report is required since, it appears, trees will be retained onsite. The City of Tigard Advanced Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • Request lighting plan (exterior) to advent crime prevention measures. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Prior to the issuance of building permits, documentation shall be provided that indicates the minimum fire flow is available at the required hydrants. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that no part of the structure is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant. (UFC 903.4) 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901 .4.3) 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/new construction.htm NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 26 OF 28 Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: ODOT has reviewed the traffic impact study dated May 2001 for the roposed Carbucks Car Wash. It is expected that the carwash will not generate enough traffic to significantly impact the operations of the frontage road intersection with OR 99W. No traffic mitigation is necessary. The applicant needs to obtain an access permit from the Frontage Road to the site. ODOT Permit Information (for the applicant): 1. Any work in the state-owned right-of-way will require an ODOT permit. 2. An application for an ODOT drainage permit must be completed if the site's drainage enters ODOT's right-of-way. A drainage study for the site may be required if: Total runoff entering ODOT's right-of-way is greater than 0.05 cubic meters per second, or The improvements create an increase in impervious surface area by greater than 1,000 square meters. 3. The applicant shall obtain an access permit from ODOT District 2A, at 503-229-5267 for information on the written application process. Washington County Department of Land Use has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 18, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 2, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 27 OF 28 • THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 1, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. pr, ,- _ October 18, 2001 PR P ��• . -►� c T i'gger DATE Assistant Planner I:\cu rp I n\m a th ew\s d r\S D R2001-00009.d e c.d of NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH PAGE 28 OF 28 '7 , =■_-_�= CITY of TIGARD ilml i .W.il - -T-- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM k = .. .: .• ~ VICINITY MAP TI M AN • -11 4_ ! 1II' • ���_ = �� SDR2001 -00009 _ == , QPG� CARWASH wi- ilk L 441111‘ • IplP o"a r.. I" 9 .4 1 = 11142:1 1 ^.,. ■ r (', 0,.... I N,It,c,„ � 0 400 B00 Feet WPI:_ 1-:501 feet ■ t• a4 ,I . • op City of Tigard r‘co,fr ■ ♦era . Information On this map is for general location ony and III .I should be verMed with the Development Services Division. � 13125 SW Hall Blvd � Tigard,OR 97223 e C * ■47,* 1•.., hJ5lwww e3.tpa1 yd1or.us Community Development Plot date:Aug 23,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR Zr illk CITY OF T10.0 ..‘ --V" "V U " 7 $ i� / CD • \. itlf LOT i 0 --- , :.. oil 0: Z• ' ,,,,,:,/,,,,,," torA tis.0,V\1107 r < 01010.111114.: -k. ,, o .,.., ib �L. l,..0 li 01111111104i0, LL o� , ;°r r O w LOT 3 ` s r I / '') < I- O:ff' -- 411„. KCfif U ■ ►ao• re cup ra4II r \ Z > ram/. 3 r \ . .. LOT <. P06 � � �� OF T I G ARD + SDR200I-00009 SITE PLAN N CARBUCKS CARWASH (Map is not to scale) Milo N e o so w% a M aJestic H6 e s' inc. g �p01.040 p9°a /04 CRV CKS Cq RWgs N G m OR 97030 William S. VVright& Associates N. Russell Street, Suite 20 1 Port/a 9722? �O Region 1 AtT F nde i k o n AlG P oi NV v a2Pand GR 9, 09 4 437 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF TIGARD Community<Development Shaping (Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2001-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on October 18,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on October 18,2001, postage prepaid. (Person that Prepare. Not e) STATE of o E� Gow ) County of�fWashington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the � day of 1 / , 2001. .: OFFICIAL.SEAL °:. DIANE M JELDERKS Li I /NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON A _ COMMISSION NO.326578 I ■ I I 'i'r I�' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 My Commission Ex I s: EXHIBIT NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00009 A.'Ail. CITY OF TIGARD CARBUCKS CARWASH Community(Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 12/19/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00009 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. OWNER: Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum, Trustee APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky 21390 SW Edy Road Majestic Homes, Inc. Sherwood, OR 97140 PO Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 18, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 2, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. AApieal: The 1 ector's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 1, 2001. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. lib: Nii a 1111ff Milts am -------- ; pm ---'''' r RA, �■ 2� VICINITY MAP P NEM IM� � � �l IP � b � SDR2001-00009 � 1111,,,w,,1 ,CARBUCKS CARWASH i � = i ..= s' 1111, '''■ Sr 'It )i -fir Oa OOP opiA e_VAL• „,, 011* /*VIINislik I riff ,,,,:, A We 411.11aNift Pill ‘■ #111 in I we.Y/W /118 Itid PI C eAkisIrd .. ww.r "w.m it*- S. mot' Z s '.1 co yA ' � �1� _ z Z ' J, r Q ={ I ill1liipl!!il1U1i�� 0 , �. �✓',l••inlll`lll,, �Il!!ii Vii!• �, �t �Ii101 ii• I I— 0 '�54 \ '�� / I n �. ' Q . N / 1 " I— CITY OF T I G A R D BUR2001.00R9! SITE PLAN N CARBUCKS CARMAM (Map is not to scale) s, �� ,� EXHIBIT 3 ; BARASCH STEPHEN BY WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE GENERAL MOTORS CORP M/C483-616-420 16 E JUDSON ST PONTIAC,MI 48342 1 S 136CD-01001 CHEVRON U S A INC PO BOX 285 HOUSTON,TX 77001 2S 101 BA-00200 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 999 LAKE DR ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 2S101 B8-01201 CO TCO HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT CISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR IS AQUAH,WA 98027 1S 136CD-02200 CO TC HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT XCISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR I AQ H,WA 98027 • I S 136CC-02000 GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K TRUSTEES 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1S136CC-02100 GR NB M HANS H AND MARILYN K TRUES 213 WEDYRD S ERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CD-01000 MONAGHAN FARMS INC 14120 EAST EVANS AVE AURORA,CO 80014 1 S 136CD-00100 PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 9-May-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY Of TIOARD Community(Development SlrapingA Oetter Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR200I-00009/CARBUCKS CARWASH AMENDED NOTICE (Fle No;Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 23,2001, and deposited In the United States Mail on August 23,2001, postage prepaid. (Person tfiat Prepar N. ice) STATE OE oGoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of 0 , 2001. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE PA JELDERKS +•' ' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON MY COMM SS OI N EXPIRES SEPT.07, —412 4.0411a_.4 ' I I I IT' �• My Commission Expires: 7/7 0 3 £alp NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. 0 NOTICE F PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION �. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW �I CITY OF F TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping,l Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: August 23, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00009 FILE NAME: CARBUCKS CARWASH PROPOSAL: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 4, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." II►' _ . 2., �� i — ' ,O imp _ VICINITY MAP 1 71 --�� • •, • 1i. ! 1 .!1.. '�, ' ip snR200 l ooao9 := ► , AO CARBUCKS CARWASH 1,..: eon, ■i .m. .. 1 1 it r I er 'A aw 0 E% WI rill ,o.1!.4,4 ott ...a. ..., dam_ �•�. , I N WI4 MIT 1111 1 . # 114 lir ■- 4, City of Tiprd *A. .rr.r��r.rrr..yr EXHIBIT B 1 S 136CC-00100 BARASCH STEPHEN MIKE NEDELISKY BY WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE MAJESTIC HOMES, INC. GENERAL MOTORS CORP M/C483-616-420 PO BOX 1046 16 E JUDSON ST GRESHAM OR 97030 PONTIAC,MI 48342 1 S 136CD-01001 CHEVRON U S A INC WILLIAM S. WRIGHT & ASSOC. PO BOX 285 809 N. RUSSELL STREET, SUITE 201 HOUSTON,TX 77001 PORTLAND OR 97227 2S 101 BA-00200 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 999 LAKE DR ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 2S 101 BB-01201 CO TCO HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT CISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR IS AQUAH,WA 98027 1 S 136CD-02200 CO TC HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT CISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR 1 AQ H,WA 98027 • 1 S 136CC-02000 GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K TRUSTEES 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CC-02100 GR NB M HANS H AND MARILYN K TRU ES 213 W EDY RD S ERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CD-01000 MONAGHAN FARMS INC 14120 EAST EVANS AVE AURORA,CO 80014 1 S 136CD-00100 PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 9-May-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Crag head 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 _■ - . OEM 'I' CITY of TIGARD_____z ei— ' _ LE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION eYeTEY AREA NOTIFIED 11P IP. (500')00 Q hi. 151360001000 Ilk 131360000100 Allkili ______ FA ..------- FOR: Mike Nedelisky Y RE: 1 S 136CC, 02100 90 " �; nwaeuu X10 Property owner information . ", is valid for 3 months from * .�� A SUBJECT SITE \ the date printed on this map. 411116h, . rQ =sum J m • 1DEPL 251018000200 N 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 1"=376 feet 1111111111111, AloliA City of Tigard .'O44 Information on this map is for general location only and ' should be verified with the Development Services Division. ` 13125 Tigard.SW O Halt Blvd HERM� 3125 OR Hall 97223 Bin -_. �_ ■■ MIN (503)http:llwww6u.tpard'or.us 'Community Development Plot date:Jun 5,2001;C:lmagicWIAGIC03.APR 1 S 136CC-00100 BARASCH STEPHEN BY WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE GENERAL MOTORS CORP M/C483-616-420 16 E JUDSON ST PONTIAC,MI 48342 1S136CD-01001 CHEVRON U S A INC PO BOX 285 HOUSTON,TX 77001 2S 101 BA-00200 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ATTN:EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 999 LAKE DR ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 25101 BB-01201 CO TCO HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT CISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR IS AQUAH,WA 98027 1 S 136CD-02200 CO TC HOLESALE CORPORATION ATT XCISE TAX DEPT 111 999 E DR I AQ H,WA 98027 1 S 136CC-02000 GRUNBAUM HANS H AND MARILYN K TRUSTEES 21390 SW EDY RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CC-02100 GR NB M HANS H AND MARILYN K TRU ES 213 W EDY RD S ERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 136CD-01000 MONAGHAN FARMS INC 14120 EAST EVANS AVE AURORA,CO 80014 1 S 136CD-00100 PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES I BY WYSE INVESTMENT SERVICES CO 200 SW MARKET ST STE 345 PORTLAND,OR 97201 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 9-May-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Sent By: Design Associates; 360 891 7726; Jun-5-01 9:44AM; Page 1 /3 • COVER SHEET FAX TRANSMITTAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES 5620 NE Cher Road, Suite E Vancouver, WA 98662 360-896-6901 360-891-7726 FAX Date: coor- y -r From John Gilmore ,,r� ,., Sent to: �4�r` rzi, - uk,/ Ault: pa-rrf e L Ili I e, Voice Phone: Fax Number: 503, G 04. _ 7 This transmittal includes cover and other pages. COMMENTS U dot), I . Sent By: ,Design Associates; 360 891 7726; Jun-5-n1 9:45AM; Page 2/3 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT j.1"Ay_ PLANNING DIVISION CITY OFnaARD Cbrn munity CDevefopment 1 3125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Straputgfi Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: 503-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-7291(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST FOR 50 OWNER , AILING LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP TAX LOT NUM1RS (i e. 13134AB,Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT{preferably assessor's tax map): I '5 17 - 4"6 a %s M-I ikrCykigtug INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting.you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: _MtI. Ligiti6L,r PHONE: _ 10 —6O5* This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 1-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels(20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * _sheets of labels x S2hheet = $110 x sets = $16.00 / sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet = $d1- a sets = $7 - Z sheets of labels x S2/sheet for OT area x.2 sets = $4.00 / sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for ClT area = tolesc_ sets S, ‘3 FuEoA.TE,IST- !:: °c GENERATE LIST= Slat TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL= .■ (/ f 6t1..v - v i 0 . C7 1'4 N . C7 • 0) ∎ I' ��' 0 tT �p r / r • P� x it A \c,`°`� / is F. 1. O �t ' rJ / 7'' N W C I 10 2 ,L[\ p. �4 ;�� NW OARS oho � In 0 0. ' / 1(i i o o to o % o zr�yyP �� , 2100 ; • i" A to to �. ✓ / a: g'] MAC A A �% ttiZ t 000 89 " x / 1Oah '�' KlAr - �" ��G ". 3 f a - ! m , 1. ■ 1 --S. 31./fro "° cs4 - "1. r0' y ` QQ 1 ``O - • 1 i Y1 'n r- x N. �p�(L — gg _ N • pLD rn co it- _ may` o_ A S ��^a 0 A.51/7-5 �. d P/4 15/.4-1 F.•aC°`lc �Rk GS C� �DR- �i al IF F' CO 0 N N 4 C 1 01 H 1-1 c FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY SEE MAP DO NOT RELY ON FOC ANY OTHER USE APP 2 5 199? ❑ JJ m C `S ' 1 B T1GARD APPLICANT MATERIALS VU/ VU/ LVV1 VV.YI 1A0 VVVV VYI LVI V1..J V1 110111 IA c.vv- 1 f 1 , SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW `'' TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd.. Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX:(503) 684-7297 . GENERAL INFORMATION 1 PRE-APP.HELD WITH: 5 I DATE OF PRE-APP.: ____=-11 i Property Address/Location(s): 1 i Ai_ ti� �A c-I i�G i-1 W I A.:,....;..., `. +1 . w I n,,... k :a.:*. 11t,, dip*' 3AK,F't1J'$ ,iQ�IL'Y Cc toe— /17 . 'PAG. Pipe. „: Ell:t,•.��,:r,� �..::.. '.i'•.;. r ., Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): Sl 3 �vCG 021 D� _ '� .'se 6; � �F dW)J "; ni.�ai�y. rffr'.M t o /1.. YY.41/'r.� ,,,,:. :.!:,4',. I Rgeipf " ;i_4"�rJ4l�PQ:°.7 '� �► Site Size: 17 q i7- :., 6joc p -e,"'•17(1',.y'4 ..;;:,: 1 t v . ,' Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)1: c/o Lou.t crwi 5'._14/e41,- /i 1150G... : : "?' ,.!4;i ' T;, ,,`,i ,:' �� � '�Y 1(1�. ,i •, nrl , + Address: M I. '�55Eu._ 5T St20I Phone: SU3- '3S 33 ..664 ;;.t't + t..,; ^' ; •`1,,: ..y.1 .I. `c a t i e r G. �ftt,.xRth�x., city: ra-r'(.a�JO ACC. Zip: _ ct 7?�1 ,1... -r; i:w�' '! I 1 .t:....,h • Applicant: MI 1/.6 N62g,L181ey' a % 'ttt ?'skirl. 'natlot Af u+ �:ti$,:-lrl i.„!se a Address: re Oc2x 10.4-ea Phone: SO -(,5 '-271 City: L.1-426Q-IA kit zip: 9/65o :E UIRED SUB ITEL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will II4t be accepted When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant without the required submittal elements) must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner_ The owner(s) [( Application Form must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this d Owner's.Signature/Written Authorization form or submit a written authorization with this application. g Title Transfer Instrument or Deed • IZ Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes PROPOSAL SUMMARY . EY Site/Plot Plan The owners of record of the subject property request Site (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Development Review approval to allow(please be specific): ( Site/Plot Plan(reduced 8'/i"x 11-) colArrtycfo,. ) ,r) Cliabe Ilk ri) Av-rie M p,r_i — O • •plicanrs Statement , (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Ciarz W Ahl� N_ SA Sewer Use Information Card ,Tistributed/completed at application submittal) I SA Service Provider Letter - "L�' 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City [?J Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits &Notes Gj Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 (S100.... 9-•.999)..__$1,600.00 ($1 Mil . &Over) $1,780.00 (+$51510,000 over the first million) Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 Sent : Design Associates; 360 891 7726; Jun-6-r 2:14PM; Page 2/3 ' 06/00/2001 09:47 FAX 5030847297 CITY of Tigard 1009 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: •/tt�.crtyt -APPLICANTS: p SUBMITTAL ELEMEhIl:' as To consider an application complete you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRE SU M described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ▪ The a�pver-• _= t d• .of v.• - - an • -- • r - -•ns th. u- attach.si imposed upon the subject RLQPSrtYs • If the application is granted, the applicant wilt exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements In the plot plan.attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it i$round that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and ciiterla, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. GATED this ___ day of ___1761,44_ , 20/7 / Owner's Sig rc nee' SI natur Owner's signature Owner's Signature • 2 2 07/08/2001 22:©© 5 033357152 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 02 08/25/01 13:52 'Q503 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND �j002 Washington (OR) OWNEI2:11P INFORMATION A.deronoc 1'aoul 1S136CC 02000 TYSQ -015 ,AI W 36 bW _5W ParcaNu r :R02i�i051 Ormer ;Grpahauua Elias ff S Mtarib•K CloO.rncr c 1lvaaes Sibs Addccss a•No Nita AJdawa' Map Addrsam :711Wt AW T.dy lCd Sherwood Ur 97140 Tcleehone Owner :303-625-7171 Telephone Taua21 SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION —'- Tnmaferred :11/03/1996 Loan Amount Dorumr.4a N :111043 Lender Sale Price Loan type . Dead Type :Warranty Intl:inlRats %Ownod :1100 Vciting'fyne :TrarrYru.lea ASSESSMCNT AND TA, INFORMATION nf*aa4L d visa Lase 5151,21t1 Exempt Auaouur • Amid Total•519,410 ltdkt S0 cruse • I xempe Typo O. cy4OI Diretca :Tigard Mkt Total 531210 Levy Code .o2.1B1 %improved 00-01 Tama •$449.23 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map<ind • Class Cork 045 C;coaos :Tract Hloak, NbrhdCd •7P14Y =Rate :19.2769 lfulv'Ptas Land 1;se :2002 Vacanl,Commerai2l Legal •ACRES.10 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Dcdroorl» i Lot Acres •10 Ya:>tr Halt Hathrvoaau foot Sg1Z :4.350 tflYritalt : Iias N1: w1 • BsmIin SF Finn!:Covaa : Pool IlemUafmSF Foundation : pplianwc B roLowlif Hoof Sladpo ; Diahwealbar Dldl;Sgl'"t Roof Mall Hood Fea ltltlalrSgll Tntcno:Mat : Deck • Lpperf1BV a Pav,nq Matt : OarnKa Type Porch Set °omit T Congo SF Aaic SOK i Eat Piniah • Dcck ligt't . nip rginnar em 1►n.tduti tr primed aruabk Bra 014r Cwsv.6.4. c_ 07/08/2001 22:00 5033357152 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 03 08/26/01 13:63 1,803 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND x003 sty oamoN } ea CaMd a.ma , 4163 mid Doc ; 95D81043 A da.40 ,01 16i6s• 17/x3/1495 10:310ONi it 3 07/08/2001 22:©© 50333571 ? WSWREALESTATE PAGE 04 NW II thigutnalIALOMeall — f i iaOQJtA.�r— ___________i; •GrrIMdr I; 6 _..__ .. . -- „a w��• -�wn6auatr--Ls...t+�a.a-. -- ' atrr,.. .,�...wt.. ro !�y - ±a� aiwg...a.,i-1 1t_�ta[ae. 11M dtdt.�i 2L rte A•s --. dmp�fxaowe I' ,n� Hr�lol1q rtrid daavfbM "D _ewer--r .. -� �r wn crtV. -.. ...-Ocoa+fr. �'�"1t: .i n "•,:orp,.Upal K 4 Y ra/lbrfh h.MitedflJMdTh .--w _,.. n f4ace &ttf Land LA the S'uue',cweat q++gaian. o/ Seket .on 3tS, TawnaltLp 1 S. t/t, ii Zan a 1 Vaal, WLLLaa tic PIitAldham, Ln Wa.hi.ny.'_on erehAt , ORe¢va, a_ad bRER1 ¢ PVi i.ure iii tAat txac of land cal Yt G0. tv /?4.4 1. ?abeee, ti ea, bye dsaal ac4o Ada:{ 2 t /�uuk 231, Pic 757, 0c4 kteu ed.: :1 _ ,( Ba9LnnLn¢ of Erie NaAtAOwit co trysts a1 sated Ta.mt4 /aaef and mannLn9 thtimC t, aLunS. the IVu4thRR1J .t eta• o f aaLd Pql,ra.. Trtact South 52.'23 ' Wcra.t 9 . 7 ?ALE tir a puLat, wnCcn 1.11. al,tt the rYuathwaat Coanr.n of that L.ant,t o Land ovnva4std ,I to c4aha r'lefnal�, et ux, b!1 deed aee.t.ded L#% Cced� 8vvciA 3O7 Q?}€ I /O, w4t.ch Z.. rel.♦e t/e• t;._u a poi-nf s c ' &andok}ti�1llNt4f 1~et t�cacci.bed; tittftce. 'i • fits grouser is eras'aeet sneannbrarwa IrXrApI . r rltir enr+7 - !- Maw comply with ehr nesevinaawlll al 0t� !d x701 The trim Lyn'kigrrt ion b aalee is It- yST......:_•_,..•.`......,, .. ..p_......— • ...._..._.... .. ,......__._......•... ....- .._......•�.,w.,.iu.,• ,..rue....J.-....._...—..-...._J."-`.._.._...............nir......�.... n .. oared t __ ....._.day of�.. k,.._.. ,'4 I/5 ij: i 1 r, !r . ; IN%it r wu IOW c teat• • 1+l.1 '' iq watt 'twirl WouQ+owar .. liff _ - ..,....__....__.�. ..... ............_......_._... p� la sem ovRT Vt� !MD .1 Lwl n �'�uast raimimil OR POW rfLiCrICIES K MR ut ......�.._...._.•.•....r--._.... --_....._ me at�u Sy,�TE OF OR60ON.coiner el.,4.mni.c4.f .... .,...__a."�'.y ti■inu .n aci�neVledjad b a ale on(�IG1.C.l.I�ar..44••^ ---. .!9_ �� � '•�=r COMMON 110,04449 Notary Publk Ix Q f+1ilOR // CC�� h+r_____LlI •.'1.1141.1® Ply ammisaian rtpirea.....t .f_'.. ...L...._ _.__.... �� STA PC OF ORSCON, r +Ian -..�.-•_•�. isai. '' 4,--.( 4M,∎-•;:., r•.t.[r d C�t.l County of• I 20.. 90•-4.:� 1 rierwird ._-. _......__ I csr(W that few ... ••• i,.n-- .fJ�sc.'vad,..:� u•d...a14.)...-....- menf was received /or re o d en the of.•.r.,..—acia k. -M..and reretd I I fsJLL 1 tine;-I+tc..G.�rIL�C a"'r�mefM/ tN 1�n4/rsw//ratllme No. ..._.w• 2I f 70_S-..I1...-F ,�-::.1.-.._--..,______. rail ri t �.._...�._.., a art{ee/li>./:rs*'nl- J._ d... -... . ..,�. f llul_.W...____.... ""A'""'"" menl/dsierdrlm/reecoliori xo.,,..._.... - ,lhMt.Ait,nioti•,+ Reeart!4,1 Deeds of Arid county. 1 _ Wiht r. ajY hand and ara! tst U"nt IS*AMP ii"ha.4.L a.Nay r,.t...ran.a lTgcanly-ellia'ed. .■fit he x,11 w t�,.tia.•.I.y.raM•N .r.lcur- • u.a, t/nn, .. scald-..Ja.:r...'.■■n -4 . ., rte: 41 ..•_. ..-.-........... -7::;;"----"--------,42._.- y- ./4.15.a..4.....1-,,.......1,..1.0_1U. .. . __....._,....,.. .flal�!t�tvv_t:�_(?8 i a:244,.....-........-..7—. aY-•------•---........_...__Dw•zft 4 07,'08;'20411 22: 00 5033357159 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 05 ,South 0•081 Ec.ci uN the Wt,At Line di? paid Ar.tcae, I Kact 178. 6 Ca�nJt to the s ,Voath Ltn� • that c4idt eonveN!,� to Want S01ttI�mQ.tt Co•nert haitao� On tAC � 3 � goon +1.. ndc4 at a fyi o peed a,00n VT, tAama. I. Laed Ea+�, at u�c by dasd 4ec4 � F �j L 41."1 Atha Eatt�sL,,,��!!� Lae qg that tn.aet conveyed La the Rota o +-a��w, and fnaur5d! 444 #1.0 y� omm4ae404 by deed Racondad in B00A 761 Yag�a 347 • r West 127.61 �! t tv a 5/8 bled* Zen wd on the Last Une o4 Noe-ill ,t eL ji altck ce aawide.d at Pa a 413 up' D1.d Ramie 352; that t.RacL .�°arty -d to �KCAII tierce NuatA 0'4i 2! Nett on Last paid C44t li.na /. feat to the tii.pht vC mrr.. Li.us e4 UU.S. MLyhoag 4"� taW at a aLnt on a eu•tve. whoet. nadiue Le 1412. 4 t''t; thence OA aai cva /aft an ate dµtanae 0, 78_78 'ant thturc¢h a centit44 an ht a 03'55" a point OA the Wt. t LZne of 'meld lhetc¢L( react, firetri�0'0d�' WeAt 3, 35 f.:e.t kLein 3/8 Lnah wd; fhZRee MoiLLA 0-08' /tat 32. 97`, mona VA CsOJ, to the town. poi.itt v{ begLhni,ng. 1 J _. _..,..r - .,rte - -• ,r 5 07i'08i2001 22: 00 503335 7152 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 06 08/25/01 13:55 21503 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND 1006 Washington (OR) OWN IP INFORMATI Rs:M=44 Parcel 1S136CC 02100 TRW ,AI 51 -01W 36 s �q Parcel!tun*,r W019110S Omar Grvnbaum liana 11 J.Marilyn K Goowncr •Ti uatccs ani 47233 Site Addrep :11744 SW Pacific Way Tig Mail A0&t3$ :21399 SW Kely Rd Sben.uod Or 9/140 ,klrpllonr Tbu>•it Tclophaac Qwnrs M3.625-7171 SALES L AN INFORMATION 'Da n Awount T,uasft T d :0111i/199d lender ihw;untcn'd ;b57957orUwn Of I ender Type Sakrice ItanT) c Decd Type :W arrtaaly vesting Type :"i ruanTharnae %Owned :lOD ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATIO 1& .31sokure 3.11rt LmG 5143,343 gram t Amount ' AaxJ Tota1:3122j30 Mkt Structure .. ELrci t Typt 537�46U Sel■001 District ;'Tigard mist = Le• ('.rnic :0234] %Ir roue :21 (10.01 rases :31,36049 %1t�pTavctl :21 PROPERTY DESCRIP1 I• . M EP Crsid :655 F3 t Ii c Code :01 Caus•„Y 1 Tract:3ulA0 Block:1 Mil 113af� :1427A9 NbrhdCd :ZPHY S b/Piat - Land Use :2012(u ,1+apravad t.t7 ;ACY1LS.36 ER9PERTY CMARACTERISTIGS Lot Allot :36 Year Rat . Bedrooms Lot S4Ft 11632 EIIYrirDlt Hew{Mna, j IDFin SP Flour Covet Beal*lethnd Fin...�.time 1'001 IiuutL'n!mSF Ruui SLapc Appliadcec Scm w to4F : Ruck Mall USa�uukti Bldg SO Hood Fan l atPldtiF1 llama:Mal : Dock UpperpCP Poly iug bad Csinst Type Parch S4FI Lineage Attic StiFL F.7rr Pinata rLineage S g�SF Dock SyFt Ma litArmsi Na Pra.idd A.braved Q,J ir:t but!r.N(.t Govvntrxel 6 O7/ 8/2@1 22: i 5033357152 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 07 00/25/01 13:55 tr5o3 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND ;11007 —.mum• • • • ,• • • .• woo.i.vwm . : 61, t t • 4/.1 *Con. • . . •••••Al • • • r ••• s , A :W... • OTOS OP Oilia0O 4.1 Covey M . • • 1114 • d : • "•,.1 -mar Doc ; o4;10579a Rect. 1%392/ 07/11/1,1111 4• /ire • „ _ .; . • • - - - - .• •, •- • •- -.1 0.4 I ..,•••••■•-r — ••••— • • 4..r.amp- . _ - - — ' - ,■414r4,.`""' - 447- pre P7-L •■• Aleit 4174," - tadoriawagam—=•-• erallai4 MC. orev7r " • ' ' 7 07/08/20 01 '21: 01:1 50333571F') WSWREALESTATE PAGE 08 • 10 'O rl"'"-- ".. ....�.i� wil l- - �. Gsl*rC�1.uar.-1l��.. ..11,01 . .._-..- -----It.�:�..ti�dC.�C.�.iYlC7G►Y+F�-!-RM f!'f�.-l'T�,:"-'- ll �" ones"d' IMc+a f.6 ip s64/1s11p u l l arch Iwaill ala.lsd rd-.r l.�lr..r...+o... _...- -.�.,nowt, id..■41004p.til Zdalatt j - - a pip W!s Wade OW,aO1m1NJ!DPICav OliQNWNW Utti 7h.pew(''+r five heel anestwBrMiPf wsr. - ri,by*wrd.r.dt,++f.r 1k1.ea.ra/s110.M....-.....---.._.or-00- (peen i1►+ With N•�`w�re d aR018,10) s11q�mIlg_ M cam .._.__.�.. 1,..r..r.. -. / - a...t�rr.....7,�'e_d.,d, ._ .-�is Via• ...... _ ..r_. -..., �r , --_ -Sow . I IA . ^�*�' 1 i t vfm g K •7 ..1;' am, — ����.«... .. Alt srAT op o nicort.county d. a ...-------`-")IL w.r adtrx∎f•dPA f rc.rw HI_94. \ %. kll N-.-.q;! L ! - JILo 6insardon fapim , _ I ,rw 00101bPRIIII „� sales OOP ai�ar.Qn. 1 -' pions-71.. .ea MIc11.0 J. CZ,..A. *.+ - J}.s. - aswo sn oo fn.d .•. .w Gtww,01.._..•-..-_•-_: rcmr rthaiIhf �Mti -. I 0}w�wvda may.. BMW .a.Jrulr.d kr erupt na 1 • 1 amp..�,.,,-+■asestfala I-p. . e!_..._..1.IGOR—IB-.eMaord� $I Vt. L LO 7pR3..w .rope•.,u. Pa. Rs f.0Id11/I$F* �...w: r rntAlli4..Mlg/r K.r—r ooitl�rda PA 77. 1- - .. _ ,,,«........r. Record ap..d.or..:soaiutr. ....r Wilms. Ay%..a i am”1 _ s.r.�r r■pu.�fdl fw Mi..rli L1.ledp affa.d s_ •00111.way ale 0s,YNlb...14r.dpi+.. WWI _ :I.,. ,p _., ..ArRWT -- ia�.Wall/bi — a �-0lr,■.1� '�-. .T`!;'+`5 w1,1 I \ .�.G�. !r��' y�:if,r'' .�Tl'1 .. - u. _ 1 - " �`Fl{{{•r--... ., ; ��qq�` �, i 1e 4.t�' yw it!lN..►.•d.."r•. .:w •G1� � i, -. r S c 51' i . 8+ {�.i• l Y�r' i,•1, -'•JL .W>w.•—• -- . i rti .a -° c- ',M ti •-rvf+) b -•..o •mot.- rte+-• � :•fl n/t ,�t� . ► m iu y-s : ... c' r ,Y. Ie rr .. . 4 • ' -, .•..- --— -.�_;'+ 4 '_ • `� rrt•f a i�Puit'J':�1:.T r . ..`.a� -- + --=:".....t.:-.*- Y._ .• ..,.Os,=u.cv;`Hh.:!'.i. .-.••••• . T---X.. . . "' c'—. r.•∎ti-T..::.:r.+'- 8 07/08/2001 22:00 5033357159, WSIAREALESTATE • I . PAGE 09 . . . ., . .. . ... t.:: 1 • .../ 4. - • TO • : . '",-, waaahmtir 0011P . v.• mmis anutaims, agukaaca, aala ME 11,, OlaiNalatal .% '' -=',;:e .2 : Aim manta U. 0211111AuK, TalM726. =Mal DA21123 OUNIS 23., 3.4114 ..,.......k. ....,...*. ..:, 14, •...“. r4-: • A• 4':• • • AA' "'NA ' • 4....,,f •AIS• awl Mt 00 obiresasirk OCATal/N id Oat osftdato tteft - r.gr.• ..:s ',4 at land 0, pieeeggeen O.L.e. NOS In MAIM . 30, anus, MG 106 alarms moiety; Ostassa. Oneme1108, - to IWO' 1.- xxlosic load assn. rein=Isrlhoggl csmoodad on - . v -.> OW 7111 of took 151. MosbAngton copaV . Oposek Des0 -ti. mans.. sna rimming thanes lamp cies meet lima of tha . , - , Peladirt trout, 5 u- oe, ii. 311.01 feet Sel ha %Von cad met O. . e t. rk, v. mai fast rem -dap mardwaat clown=at Let 3.. - • .. ' :.'• fr2 Tian (Oak; ziam, a auncLioleien of sasogar *home -A( •. ' pemmundma g. ov ail ir iva..d feet to se ilea Tog: numekedi ttlisabt 11. IV 427,11. 7Z.8 feet to ea Igen X,17_ -- -.....,....1J issoalsta thmoos paralleit traldlrahat-Lbii-of the * ,. ..... enure V. V QV rt. 142.4 Cast V8 en LM24 1441? th046 1411411111111111 N. 0° alli W. a4,2 fast I& a pokes en the =Vesely lime of the Folsor tonDoVr thanes X. Dl 23' as 13.7 isog.to gas place of hogionsinf. MA = to Abe . . 04:Mtn laths ItUblut vo • OA Vortimaill01119 within vonlio mereft. . . . . , . ---I 1 ' . • . . ,. . - -• . „ ... . .. . . ' • . 1 1.•,E; ' _- - • • , . .--• . _..,— . .. . - --- .. ...•.._ .. _ .-------,-----..w.u.w. -_.• •-.-----•=`-7.— — ----as - . y- , ------ - ------- • 9 07/08/2001 22:00 5033357159 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 10 08/25/01 10:68 Q503 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND 2010 _ ,s� aeu 1 s1MbA s1NUW woven MCTION * T 1 RIN WAIL rac■a■TO■tAMVr M.�M x . +'•IaJ ` Ail I7 1 wa■ : ..III .■ 1 .1 !W ' FFAFFL[ .f ' SMUT w �., :■:. w:r I 4J. 1 . X-7- • I\ 170 \ f \\11e / \ 0 .0 _ge # \.,..,.104.0••"°. 006.titif. 11\...4._ ti • 1 oo .," ,rel,:e00\__\ \ r 4 °1 '• T WAR D 19 f 511 CC 10 07/08/2001 22:00 5 033357152 WSWREALESTATE PAGE 11 08/25/01 13:58 1,503 228 7821 TICOR PORTLAND X011 �� �' II ir f \ I 1 ?is' 2100 * , 1 000 * 1 I .1011e ., I ei \ e go r N .\ _.1.... p 1 311 V IID / 0 * N lin g L !� 11 June 7, 2001 RE: Carbuck's Carwash Dear Interested Party: Carbuck's Carwash is representing the owner on the property located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway. Tax lot No. 1 S 136CC-02100. We are considering proposing constructing an automatic carwash at this location and will be submitting application to the City of Tigard for Site Development Review. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, June 21, 2001 At Hall Corporate Center 11481 SW Hall Blvd. Portland, Oregon • 7:00pm in the conference room on the 2nd floor Please notice this will be an informational meeting on Preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I will look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-658-2767 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Michael Nedelisky AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) 1, /14/G&A-/L .7-, A'-%22%t,/Sly , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 7 IN 7 , tico? I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) - // 7 ( 4&t) Pitt-A0 y a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further stale that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at / L ' -I ' >, FLJ-t4 .L , j\ 5/ /V\ , with postage prepaid thereon. ' 0 Off Signature (In the prase :* of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of-.j 4' /.)a-e /_, OFFICIAL SEAL - �3 WILLIE DE BOARD I NOTARY PUBLIC-OREG ___ ( 11P"'" �•�+� COMMISSION N0.3264 03 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 19. My Commission Expires: -o--/ Imo- 63 (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) [NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME; -rirt it,ac '3 CAL I,V"}-1/1- I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 'AZ in)• —F-,ertY i 04. I I Name of Applicant/Owner; 1 Fi= Address or General Location of Subject Property: 7 L�Si �:.= ; s s�*S% , 7,. C . !Subject Property Tax Map(ssand Lot#(0). ¶1_, Zia' o<:3 , `, Pt'logo PanYir^ssters1ofhnni(.m:1 , AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE ::'.4 :5,E l'1` ALENDI .. : 0P 141 I; t.,tiy(]y�'��►�(.�y as {� •tlMl, .�ryp n1.91 ">'.V �� It•1.. :la .'Kv•. " <.Yarw• �NIeAµ„,•w`• VKHtr•...r •NK�MKN:N n w�:ww y..,.. a�� M•r VY.Y9, •lKMix L� '1�>w.OM��'��}y�� a ^^�W:va 9Zw:aw�le.0»µ ~„`S'!NKNA�V t N.� Y:K9•. _ {�• ^M:N:>fi� 1�/.. �nr.V.1."N A,ge..•� �\11,y1//WM�.((Ka.V i:i1L�� V��p y�� }�].yyy�' MA1y nY..i/• +ki v.w.w. .ff.iyyRR ..�c: _ �•..1T _ «�na.�q.vnM Vdi"My O.On Kim� M w9vy u +'k9w n.... ,:1,•w M4•w I, 04((/$ , T. /✓ a do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed esti-z i_I SH affecting the land located at (state the apploximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) i f 7 7el Se,t) o rh y , and did on the 7 day of '✓ yNE o/ personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign wad posted at /1 70Y $•t,J Pcif.A.q e AtfAi7 (state location if u posted - *.- • property) !..•• I 41-a 44...P/ -4 el Signature (In the presence •• ,a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETEINOTARIZD Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of / a/ , 49=. r fth.,N OFFICIAL SEAL -�— WILLIE DE BOARD r % J9 NCOMMOTARY ISSION PUBLIC N0.-OREGON 326466 NOTARY PUBLIC OF O'EGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 19, 2003 My Commission Expires: /2, ) dry I (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) rNAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: C,4 KRrA GS ClhL I I TPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: C �' ``x. `c Name of Applicant/Owner: _ I Address or General Location of Subject Property 111111M1Erliffir." [Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(e): mill. ' ZC>a-' 7 C' —j • it Lt ' ataitt4) SICii's1 ' t /J SHEET Su t& ZI ,zoo P E DoREss P ticrof e _ tot cM 61,40 717------e;77-74--/L —r-tazi— /lie? 6,41-hx_ Afc) rout": 0* kt, _ , Vni • Sent By: Design Associates; 360 891 7726; Jun ?^ 01 11 :28AM; Page 2/2 CLEAN WATER SERVICES I�tJ001 o6/ U1 X12:1?FA�509 640 +�s�a Pogo 2/2 xentv�r,;: Design Associates; 3fi0 891 772d; Jun 21 .07 11 :oHAM; 001 ' 06/21/01 osP:4a PAl 640 aa2�_ VATZIt �vicES File Ntunbcr I Cle an Y Services SenS?i re Area Pre-Screanin9 Site Assessment 00s pa�A5lLmcnt it Clsir. Jurisdiction CI rY Owner Map &Tax tsA s - , 6 Site Address ^ J L Addn>►� � d Proposed ACtNlty _i/d!11 1•T7?-l• Phone Y N NA Y N NA ❑ QS# 4sZZ t (structure maps 5er ire Area Composite Map ❑ Map # ❑ ❑ ether LOcaI1Y adopted studies or maps ❑ 0 SpeSpecify SpecilY Water the above Uttotrttation and th qutVe Order of Clear W Services o" a mind Constfuotlon Standards Resolution 5efeiees Dds 9 THE gpPU ANT potentially exist on eite or within 200' ur1 the site. A SERVE MUST P erne P ICATIoN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE MUST PeRgaRne A 5S CER M ATER CONNECnON PERMIT.It Sensitive eas A OR STO W ecertt properties,oFE az PERMIT. Resource: PROVIDER s� within 200 feet on adl Xis; ASge6sm4 tat Report may ales be required. 50. sr to exist on site or within 200' of the site. ThiSpre- screening i arses do not apps s NOT eliminate the nests to evaluate and protect site assessment l' IVS re �they are subsequently discovered on your water Qualty+ sensitive a ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PRO SUE ALETTER iS Prpperry. NO FURTHER Sift ASS THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORFZATIO STO1lM REQUIRED. CONNECTION PERMIT. STOAMWA�R ment. NO SITE The proposed activity does not meet the definhion of develop ASSESSMENT OA SERVICE PROVIDER 1.ETTEp IS REQUIRED. ' commenT L. 1 I'J 1 .`. Reviewed By: /I :, -,- pew a t Fo. Pox Kale 7a 1 - RgtuT7urd 10 .e; • - apt l- . Mail Cw,w11 r ::._. . Sent By: Design Associates; 360 891 7726; Jun-29-01 11 :28AM; Page 1 /2 i • 'ti FAX COVER SHEET Design Associates 5620 NE Gher Rd. Suite E Vancouver, WA 98662 360-896-6901 360-891-7726 fax DATE: lB� /I G., pf TO: dlp sTl 'it pm/L/6 FAX: ,�o�- (/ 164t- 7297 FROM: John Gilmore This transmittal includes cover and I other pages. COMMENTS ae.13v JUSr Jou Kei sE / 7 7 / // r :•� 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - 117N w IKII IC MIpMT, Tl IflfpC•H I« 0.P PROJECT DESCRIPTION �0 v . wH WI AMA u■H.r /*/ NKOMO{rlfllr■11■f.f Pwlulrf r IS Ilfn■rl■Ilf wur�fff■d/ Palsy w.t.r`T I Wen MA• •►\` L■.yKMIMG NSW ISM 0016i LOT 1 TOTAL MIA C.41 1 7 ■H d IMOLOM4 11141 V.N.MOO"M • t i cp.A10 ' 47 ali ;� �N / DEVELOPMENT CONTACTS /T ■: ww I'II CAMP.! l 11 9PP *F7, IL44/1111 LOT 2 % '„ Aa �/ ,�;: �e I ` P if 144... IP..0 �'ii 70040 CARBUCKS 7.- ,� ��0i, .0 w CARWASH AIIMviN, ?J' 11744 ill PACIFIC ilIIT. IP.N01111.. _10_Ti TIGARD. GRRGON 1, 7,..!- > 'Ns _4,,,i/ y ( al 3 !�' LOT a de,i 9 i \ I POO ■ ocia $ /\ S ITE PLAN • ►I / ' ■C•LI I•. 11 0. ...a 'If NInul . 0 J iiiippi ....14 z i".',....---1 1; L�T � rM laik■ '�r'/%w • ,*1$1!;‘"� �,�� LoT z IlL 1 \,„7 ` �I eF Ort ice` ''/ft� `'I[r'4Irer VI ��' +17 il J O LOT 3 A5 *IV4k� �' �tilff z 3 v _ f/`� 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY. t j TIGARD. ORIGON POB :* d...411 9 it1:74W Pip Z' ' I 1 \\ViiI"derr " I li • �► I LOT 4 /" EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN .�4 I! 0 5 d;,;o��„ t.f.M!s ••1 • / J 7 PPS • Z , • / LOT 1 7 11° r----------...... 7,7 - ' ..4 ---00'----- iiiAll v------ropo A 1 tZ:41 ' ''Til.- )1Pf \ 14\ C � 01011104 ‘-- \\,,,,,, air.' #, I lI ,,I 1 q deli 11114,Y 1011► AY LOT 2 ill j Si::: illlllllIIIP` p�`y 7 �0 Cir s T z CARBUCKS U' �or, �o LOT 3 CARWASH fv ci. w •.t• 1171 f� �ACIfIC Nw1r. Y G TIGA[D. iR[GON OE/frtrOr `\,� 0 U TO alL TOWS 0 SPILL.AY/'' Z —> -A\ CLAY:L w. ��J � JJe t� S ITE GRADING .\, T � 9Ilocio�, : / ' SC•1.t 1•. f0' . i LO lonn.r. % 1 i f ipn W "642 V NI t • / // /V / / // 7 / �/ Vii' J % / -( #4 UTILITIES LEGEND vow. ¢�� • 9� o -.in.Till N. in -MINI MOT SIM !� MIMING Wit mar ..../. MIMING -N11 N■TI t IM -R/ -OWING.a(utG POL 6, OOM Mina GNfON1CO.TIRO w0 Oo1COUlCT N11 100{1100000 i11CIIIC14 uK �y_ ■) MIMIIIG MIAOW HMO -'P NMI TURMAN/cma Ord LOT I MIMTMO la NeT10 j,1 11111116 NEU MI MAI./ `' P a d / Oto.-y `iGi Llww 1a . 111101 111 �c'I ;h I��loop II��' LOT Z �.�, h��.►. 0111 �IQ�IIIII'`llil -- 7� Illlli"" ( CARBUCKS CARWASH I 11744 VW PACIFIC NVY. 7 J O LOT 3 TIGARD. ORIGON ' LIJ V F- ' I < IQ \ ❑4 Z> \ _ . _ 1 PCB I + LOT 4 - u «IQ r., $ /. SITE UTILITIES • pl...1„ • 11., 1..1, " *GALS 1'. f0' \ u11 N1 u•. ,.•■ - w.. ISM Ir11I1 Ja/ Qr ' ®4"1:441°''' 44( LOT 1 PLANTING LEGEND o _ e0 " 3r STREET TREE _ `V 1/4 i.wi�.no es /z_. I 4./ A PLANT AREA %, 4p 10111111 I I I I I / Q PLANT AREA b e / I O.O ow*MEN , F PLOWER INC nANTER 414. ,� I o • •!) 1I,i�11110 C' CAR BUCK S r 3 sQl,O lll 3 � $ p < 1 o LOT CARWASH it. W 1744 $W PACIFIC NWT. ` TIGARD. OIIGOR \ i� ou .,12.11,i,. _ r :: 3 LOT 4 — . \ POB €1.lia ... s " LANDSCAPE P LAN ' 0, .CAL{ 1•. ..• J i.....•1•...... .1"` s . III AP Ar a'-6' Ar, 7--t I 10--.• -� r•♦ A•y r-. AOy r•0• r•y r• •42, . 'r�.�.r ev .r .v a+ ,C — � � -- T 4,--0 Ni,,' • _ !�E 0 0 0 M + } it ® $ yr. .. —:1, v , r t.J .. /7.: air ■ill J i"—T 44 —.1---yr . I J % i ■ - • ••• —fit-_I n .r - M' DRYER AREA *ASH TUNNEL PREP AREA I 411. T— �� Ar L_ 0 0 0 0 ---- --L Ii P IL 4JF JP' "r ri- .11, r-. APrIr r Jr sr Nr FLOOR PLAN 7GALL 1 Pr.! --0- E JJ �{ CARBUCKS ae�'ogcia ;l. s CARWASH • FI 11744 tW PACIFIC HWY. • d..it••,• TIGARD, OREGON ..1.M...r M. 11..1.......1 • • •.u.uul1•1 ' ___..______.___1•18g•1•r ■�,•1■ 11121 111,■�1IU■71U1•�1S\•�1r1■MI1U1. jroq►uyrogslaWra• 1 gr/r�PrIrgr. i ...IU m.mom a •I.1• •t••IU• I .0 I fl ■.,••1•1,■•g1,••1•••u.n..,/•1,r•gr••1••••1■r••. _,uI. IrOp1 / IMAM I anal1U •�1H■ 11,1■1,.O w1MOI■INIR■M11II■•11 1■/nyMu1■ IN. "rngro..rugr/o•rIrr•rur•rngruq0.1rqr •■ r. J MILT-1/STUGGO PAUCe -- - ■■-�_�■■��- ■■- ■ =�1�_ BAR—��� " I u---=.---.. ��lS� m.Z= ..mm Iw�•∎ �rrmrA� ■�_�._0_==nEin , ■�_m=���m� - 11,1•MR us.RIM �� �. _ •IM����■ •�I∎IMF��M■ ■ MICK MORN j4ORTH ELEVATION Wit I/4-•I•.r' Iir alia Mil iNi lfird iirriiardli il fa6. 4.I.r.r1.r..1■r.rl UI••IU r.rl.r.rr.r. .issummanwassom iesim umommenom. i Rrr■■RrrrbrrrrRrr..Rrr..Rrr...rr....I.m i.rl��rrl�orrl�mrrlm.r.l�.rrl�.rrlde ne u e,„ 11I -- _ - -- I'JUILT-I$STULLO rAcJoe 1 e ■____..■■� a �o is{ s `nuwumnm; i '¶II =:-E=� _ CARBUCKS .— ■O ■—=IN CARWA S H o d;;^^•f1 gn•r0 �____■■_■ ■w IM=IMIMMIll=M■ Mil 1010 rte i1,•_•r• 1 1 7 4 4 SW PACIFIC HWY. 3u1 n1 •1.. 1..1 ----_e _■ TIGARD. OREGON "" w, •• •■ 13.01 1,1.11,.1 WEST ELEVATION- ENTRANCE xr.e 1 i1-•1 •-o- SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SECTION 36 T I S R I W W.M. I S I 36 CC WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I..•100' 1 SIB MAP I I j: \II I 36 Cp ; l ff. PFAFFLE ;r ` �< B SA STREET \ ••. ...... .- . ,.06« .a..r. ..« i 400 300 200 170 123c 2334 23l! I I 7 I - a f Illte !: 4 b 1 •Lt et s SEE MAP .6 S \�' SEE MAP IS I 3600 IS I 311 00 ° " 23-81 • ..... 4,,,, 7 WM Y.MAI l x F" r S i 3 � ' 4# r P"' . . � e ,sir ,1 4.70 y 9 5�� r° "y cy� 9y FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY G SEE MAP 00 NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 25 I I NI I. t ., TIGARD IS 136 CC 19OpO�a//Narl' aTVe RECEIVED PLANNING AUG 14 2001 PROJECT SUMMARY AND NARRATIVE CITY OF TIGARD CARBUCKS CARWASH TIGARD, OREGON The project proponent is proposing to construct a fully automatic carwash facility on Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon. The existing veterinary clinic building will be demolished as it does not meet with setback requirements and visual criteria for the area. Special attention is given to the siting of the building and architectural treatment due to the proximity of the site and it's relationship to the"Triangle"in keeping with the Cities desire to make an attractive entrance to the City. The project site is at the Southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound pacific Highway off-ramp.Adjacent lands are highway right of way and the Costco store to the southeast. The site is accessed via an existing highway frontage road paralleling the Pacific Highway. The building will be constructed of ground face masonry,brick, stucco and tile roofing. Glazing is dominant along the north elevation facing Pacific Highway. The use of planters and breaks in the building face with projecting fascia treatments provide a character more pleasing to the eye as well as serving functional purposes. The carwash equipment will be state of the art. Special design attention is given to water consumption, reclamation and discharge water quality. Although 100%reclamation is the target, certain amounts will be discharged to the sanitary sewer after passing through a serial clarification process with multiple stage oil/water separation.Normally the reclaim pit and equipment room are outside the tunnel portion of the building. Due to the best use of the sloping site, it was decided to place them under the"tunnel"thereby providing a more compact structure. PROJECT IMPACTS ON PUBLIC FACILITIES Carwash systems utilize reclamation of domestic water consumption in order to reduce impacts to serving utilities. The underlying theory of many local agency's determination that commercial carwashes are more controlled consumers than the wide use of "driveway washing". The impacts per car are minimal by comparison when one considers the additional impact on storm water systems. In a commercial carwash operation, none of the paved area contaminants go to any storm water conveyance. Impacts on street systems are not significant. Most all traffic generated specifically by the type of business are from drive-by impulse customers. Refer to Traffic Study within the application submittal. Impacts on Storm water facilities are mitigated by the use of detention facility with measured overflow release to an adjacent ODOT system. Storm water pre-treatment follows all required BMP's. Impacts on Fire Protection Agencies are insignificant due to the continual wet environment for a majority of the building and the materials used throughout. Impacts on Police protection could be problematic due to the tree screening along the west and the wide expanse of undeveloped right of way to the north. Site lighting will consist of wallpak down wash fixtures in the rear or south and up wash accent landscape fixtures along the north. Alternate interior lights will be left on over night to allow for visual movement detection. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction General Information Site Description Proposal Community Development Code Chapter 18.360 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1 18.360.010 Purpose 1 18.360.090 Approval Criteria 1 Chapter 18.390 DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES 4 18.390.040 Type II Procedure 4 Chapter 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 5 18.520.010 Purpose 5 18.520.020 List of Zoning Districts 5 18.520.030 Uses 5 18.520.040 Development Standards 7 Chapter 18.620 TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 9 18.620.020 Street Connectivity 9 18.620.030 Site Design Standards 9 18.620.040 Building Design Standards 9 18.620.050 Signs 11 18.620.060 Entry Portals 12 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening 12 18.620.080 Street and Accessway Standards 13 Chapter 18.705 ACCESS, EGRESS AND CIRCULATION 14 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions 14 18.705.030 General Provisions 14 Chapter 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 16 18.725.030 Performance Standards 16 Chapter 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING STANDARDS 17 18.745.040 Street Trees 17 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 18 18.745.060 Re-vegetation 21 Chapter 18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING STORAGE 23 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas 24 Chapter 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 25 18.765.010 Purpose 25 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions 25 18.765.030 General Provisions 25 18.765.040 General Design Standards 27 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards 31 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards 32 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements 32 18.765.080 Off-street Loading Requirements 34 Chapter 18.790 TREE REMOVAL 35 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement 36 Chapter 18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREA 36 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements 36 Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS 36 18.810.030 Streets 36 18.810.040 Blocks 40 18.810.050 Easements 41 18.810.060 Lots 41 18.810.070 Sidewalks 41 18.810.080 Public Use Areas 42 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers 42 18.810.100 Storm Drainage 43 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways 43 18.810.120 Utilities 43 Conclusion Exhibits A Site Development Review, Type II appl. WI supporting documents B Impact Study C Preliminary Development Plans D Preliminary Stormwater Report E Landscape Plan F USA Approval Letter G Architectural Drawing H Neighborhood Meeting Info. Transportation Impact Analysis J Construction Cost Estimate K Tree Mitigation Report L Neighbor Letter Chapter 18.360 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18.360.010 Purpose A. Promote general welfare. The purpose and intent of site development review is to promote the general welfare by directing attention to site planning, and giving regard to the natural environment and the elements of creative design to assist in conserving and enhancing the appearance of the City. B. General purposes. It is in the public interest and necessary for the promotion of the health, safety and welfare, convenience,comfort and prosperity of the citizens of the City of Tigard: 1. To implement the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan and other approval standards in this title; 2. To preserve and enhance the natural beauties of the land and of the man-made environment, and enjoyment thereof; 3. To maintain and improve the qualities of and relationships between individual buildings, structures and the physical developments which best contribute to the amenities and attractiveness of an area or neighborhood; 4. To protect and ensure the adequacy and usefulness of public and private developments as they relate to each other and to the neighborhood or area; and 5. To ensure that each individual development provides for a quality environment for the citizens utilizing that development as well as the community as a whole. C. Environmental enhancement. To prevent the erosion of natural beauty, the lessening of environmental amenities, the dissipation of both usefulness and function, and to encourage additional landscaping, it is necessary: 1. To stimulate harmonious design for individual buildings, groups of buildings and structures, and other physical developments; 2. To encourage the innovative use of materials, methods and techniques and flexibility in building placement;and 3. To integrate the function, appearance and location of buildings and improvements so as to best achieve a balance between private prerogatives and preferences,and the public interest and welfare. Comment: This application meets all required elements as outlined in Section 18.360.010. This development is designed to enhance this main entrance to the City of Tigard while giving regard to the site topography and environmental concerns. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria A. Approval criteria. The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,approving with conditions,or denying an application: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Comment: Chapter 18.800 is discussed in further detail in this narrative. This project meets the requirements of Chapter 18.800. 2. Relationship to the natural and physical environment: 1 • a. Buildings shall be: (1) Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; (2) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (3) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation,and fire-fighting;and (4) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. b. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal. Comment: This project meets all of the applicable requirements of this title. The location of the Carwash building is dictated by the existing topography, relationship of street front property line per building setback requirements of the "Tigard Triangle". The building will sit in the approximate footprint of an old existing veterinary clinic thereby minimizing required tree removal. The tree removal will be mitigated per Chapter 18.790. 3. Exterior elevations: a. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: (1) Recesses,e.g.,decks,patios,entrances,floor area,of a minimum depth of eight feet; (2) Extensions,e.g.,decks,patios, entrances, floor area,of a minimum depth of eight feet, a maximum length of an overhang shall be 25 feet;and (3) Offsets or breaks in roof elevations of three or more feet in height. Comment: This section is not applicable for a Commercial project. 4. Buffering,screening and compatibility between adjoining uses: a. Buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses, for example, between single-family and multiple-family residential, and residential and commercial uses,and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: (1) The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; (2) The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; (3) The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; (4) The required density of the buffering;and (5) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. b. On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: 2 (1) What needs to be screened; (2) The direction from which it is needed; (3) How dense the screen needs to be; (4) Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile;and (5) Whether the screening needs to be year around. Comment: This project does not abut any differing land uses. There is an existing tree line buffer along the west boundary between the 217/99 off ramp. The building project has adequate buffering along all other property lines partially due partial to the sites elevation above the south and southeast direction. 5. Privacy and noise: multi-family or group living uses: Comment: This application is for a commercial use.N/A 6. Private outdoor area: multi-family use: Comment: This application is for a commercial use. N/A 7. Shared outdoor recreation areas: multi-family use: Comment: This application is for a commercial use. N/A 8. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain,the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Comment: This application is not within a 100 yr. floodplain. N/A 9. Demarcation of public,semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention: a. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and b. These areas may be defined by,but not limited to: (1) A deck,patio, low wall,hedge,or draping vine; (2) A trellis or arbor; (3) A change in elevation or grade; (4) A change in the texture of the path material; (5) Sign;or (6) Landscaping. 3 Comment: This project will is a drive-thru facility. The only "customer" public access is to the restroom facility which faces the public way. The vacuum stations in the rear of the building are well below the building main floor due to grade changes.There are no accesses to the building from this area. 10. Crime prevention and safety: a. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; b. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; c. Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; d. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime;and e. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots,stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Chapter 18.390 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES 18.390.040 Type II Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type I1 actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in section 18.390.080C. Comment: A preapplication conference took place on February 15, 2001. The Type II application form accompanied by the required submittal elements is provided as Exhibit A. Also included are the necessary fees. The Impact Study,Exhibit B addresses the transportation system,drainage systems, parks system, water system,sewer system and noise impacts of the facility. 4 Chapter 18.520 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.520.010 Purpose A. Provide range of commercial services for City residents. One of the major purposes of the regulations governing development in commercial zoning districts is to ensure that a full range of retail and office uses are available throughout the City so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving and, ideally within easy walking and/or biking distance of their homes. The location of land within each commercial district must be carefully selected and design and development standards created to minimize the potential adverse impacts of commercial activity on established residential areas. At the same time, it is important to create more opportunities for mixed use, including residential, commercial and institutional activities, in new and re-developing commercial areas. B. Facilitate economic goals. Another purpose of these regulations is to ensure that there is a full range of economic activities and job opportunities within the City limits, in compliance with the economic goals of the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The proposed building is designed to blend in with the neighboring commercial area. The building supports the economic goals of the City of Tigard by contributing to job opportunities and increasing the range of economic activities offered to the residents of the City. 18.520.020 List of Zoning Districts C. C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. Comment: The site is zoned C-G,General Commercial. The Project is permitted in this zone. 18.530.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter,there are four kinds of use: 1. A permitted (P) use is a use which is permitted outright, but subject to all of the applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.230; 2. A restricted (R) use is permitted outright providing it is in compliance with special requirements, exceptions or restrictions; 3. A conditional use (C) is a use the approval of which is at the discretion of the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapters 18.310 and 18.320. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.230; 4. A prohibited(N)use is one which is not permitted in a zoning district under any circumstances. B. Use table. A list of permitted, limited, conditional and prohibited uses in residential zones is presented in Table 18.520.1. Comment: According to Table 18.520.1,this facility is permitted. C. Accessory structures. 5 1. Accessory structures are permitted in all commercial zones providing the site is still in compliance with all development standards, including but not limited to setbacks, height, lot coverage and landscaping requirements, of the base zone. All accessory structures shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code. All accessory structures except those less than 120 square feet in size require a building permit. 2. All freestanding and detached towers, antennas, wind-generating devices and TV receiving dishes, except as otherwise regulated by Wireless Communication Facilities (Chapter 18.798), shall have setbacks equal to or greater than the height of the proposed structure. Suitable protective anti-climb fencing and a landscaped planting screen, in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, shall be provided and maintained around these structures and accessory attachments. Comment: There are no accessory structures proposed. 6 18.520.040 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.310 and 18.320; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES MUE CBD Residential R-25 STANDARD C-N C-C[4] C-G C-P CBD R-40 R-12 C-G MF DU* Minimum Lot Size 5,000 sq 5,000 sq None 6,000 sq None None None None - -Detached unit ft ft - ft - - - - 1,480 sq -Boarding, lodging,rooming - - - - - - - - ft house - - - 6,100 sq ft Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft None None None 50 ft None Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft 0/20 ft O ft[6] O ft [6] 0/30 ft 20 ft 20 ft O ft[6] 20 ft -Side facing street on corner 20 ft [5] - - [7] 20 ft 20 ft - 20 ft & - 0/30 ft through lots[l] 0/20 ft 0/20 ft 0/20 ft [7] l0 ft[9] 10 ft [9] 0/20 ft 10 ft -Side yard [3] 0/20 ft [3] [3] - - [3] 30 ft -Side or rear yard abutting - [3] - - 0/30 ft - more - [7] 20 ft[9] 20 ft[9] 20 ft restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft 0/20 ft 0/20 ft - 20 ft 20 ft 0/20 ft 20 ft -Rear yard [3] 0/20 ft [3] [3] [3] -Distance between front of - [3] - - 0/30 ft - garage& - [7] property line abutting a public or private street. Maximum height 35 ft 35 ft 45 ft 45 ft 80 ft[8] 60 ft 60 ft 45 ft 45 ft Maximum Site Coverage [2] 85 % 80% 85% 85 % 85% 80% 80% 85% 80% [11] Minimum Landscape 15% 20% 15% 15 % 15% 20% 20% 15% 20% Requirement [10] [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [4] See Section 18.520.050B for site and building design standards. [5] No front yard setback shall be required,except a 20 foot front yard setback shall apply within 50 feet of a residential district. [6] There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. 7 [7] There are no setback requirements,except 30 feet where a commercial use within a district abuts a residential zoning district. [8] The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone within 100 feet of any residential zoning district shall not exceed 40 feet. [9] Where the side or rear yard of attached or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning district, such setbacks shall not be less than 35 feet. [10]Landscaped areas on existing developed property in the CBD shall be retained. Buffering and screening requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 shall be met for existing and new development. [11]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. *Multiple-family dwelling unit C-N-Neighborhood Commercial District C-C-Community Commercial District C-G-General Commercial District C-P-Professional/Administrative Office Commercial CBD-Central Business District 8 Comment: The proposed commercial development meets the standards outlined in above Table 18.520.2 and is permitted in the C-G zone.No variances or adjustments to this standard are necessary. CHAPTER 18.620 TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 18.620.020 Street Connectivity A. Demonstration of standards. All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Chapter 18.370.010 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. 1. Design Option a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more that 330 feet. 2. Performance Option a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile. b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight-line distance. Comment: This development is not proposing any new street construction. Vehicle access will be provided from Pacific Highway at an existing frontage road. Pedestrian access will be provided with location pending staff consultation. 18.620.030 Site Design Standards A. Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 9 1. Building placement on Major and Minor Arterials-Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50%of all street frontages along Major and Minor Arterial Streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on Major and Minor Arterial Streets. See Diagram 1 for some examples of how this standard may be met. Loral street • Abutting Property gt b 3' parking -3 parking et I G Brtldtng Building anratr ) — Major or Minor Arterial Major or Miner Arterial Ma's er Minor Arterial Furore_...Phase I __J Alt parka, 8-mm- Major or Minor Arterial Tigard Triangle Street Plan—Diagram 1 2. Building setback - The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. 3. Front yard setback design - Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to an L- 1 standard on public streets and an L-2 standard on accessways. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. 4. Walkway connection to building entrances - A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway. This walkway must be at least six feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. 5. Parking location and landscape design - Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of- way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50%of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 Landscape Standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is five feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to a L-2 Landscape Standard,except where a side yard abuts a public street, where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 Landscape Standard. See Diagram 2. Comment: This proposed commercial development meets each of the above design standards. 10 18.620.040 Building design standards. A. Non-residential buildings. All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 1 8.370.010 C2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 1. Ground floor windows-All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback(0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three feet above grade to nine feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. Comment: The proposed building provides in excess of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, projections and doorways.See elevation drawings Exhibit F. 2. Building facades - Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b)a building off-set of at least 1 foot;(c)a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade;or(d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. Comment: A combination of offsets(24")are provided along the entire street elevation. 3. Weather protection - Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. Comment: The main building entrance is under a covered portico area. 4. Building Materials - Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. Comment: A combination of brick, special ground colored CMU and stucco is proposed on all building exteriors. 5. Roofs and roof lines - Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. Comment: A combination of roof shapes (flat roof system and hip roof system)with stucco facades filling overhangs with built-up roofing on the flat areas and slate roofing on the pitched areas. 6. Roof-mounted equipment - All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. Comment: No roof mounted equipment is proposed. 18.620.050 Signs 11 A. Sign standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: 1. Zoning district regulations - Residential only developments within the C-G and MUE zones shall meet the sign requirements for the R-25 zone 18.780.130B; non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C; and non-residential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone, 18.780.130D. 2. Sign area limits-The maximum sign area limits found in 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. 3. Height limits - The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle. 4. Sign location - Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. Comment: Primary signing will be building mounted within the dimension of the façade area and will not protrude above the adjacent roof lines. A free standing monument sign for identity may be considered due to the distance and location of the access drive from Pacific Highway. 18.620.060 Entry Portals A. Required locations. Entry portals shall be required at the primary access points into the Tigard Triangle. 1. Location-Entry portals shall be located at the intersections of 99W and Dartmouth;99W and 72nd;1-5 and Dartmouth;Hwy.217 and 72nd;and at the Hwy.217 Overcrossing and Dartmouth. 2. Design - The overall design of entry portals shall relate in scale and detail to both the automobile and the pedestrian. A triangle motif shall be incorporated into the design of entry portals. Comment: The access location for this project is not at any of the above locations. Therefore this section is not applicable. 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening A. Applicable levels. Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. 1. L-1 Low Screen - For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots and along local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745 Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on major and minor arterials. Where the setback is a minimum of 5 feet between the parking lot and a major or minor arterial,trees shall be planted at 3 V2 inch caliper, at a maximum of 28 feet on center. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provided a 3 foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of land- scape area within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2 inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. 2. L-2 General Landscaping- For general landscaping of landscaped and screened areas within parking lots, local collectors and local streets, planting standards of Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, shall apply. Trees shall be provided at a minimum 2-V2 inch caliper, at a maximum spacing of 28 feet. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Any tree planted in excess of a 2-inch caliper shall be eligible for full mitigation credit. 12 Comment: This project will meet the above landscape standards.See Landscape plan (Exhibit E) 18.620.080 Street and Accessway Standards A. Tables and diagrams.The following tables and diagrams show street and pedestrian accessway standards for the Tigard Triangle. Landscape and street design details are also included in this section. TABLE 18.620.1 (Con't) Street Policy Classification Street Function Land Use/ Right-of-Way Design Priority 686 Minor Arterial Provide access to Mixed Use Employ- 70 feet Avenue Pedestrian-Transit Street local services ment 46 feet Atlanta Distribute local traf- Enhanced pedestrian curb-to-curb to fic environment Hampto Bicycle lanes Bicycle access 217 Minor Arterial Provide access to Mixed Use Employ- 70 feet Over- Transit Access Street Triangle destinations ment Crossing Pedestrian-Transit Street 46 feet Distribute traffic Enhanced pedestrian curb-to-curb West of within the Triangle environment Dartmou th Bicycle lanes Transit-oriented street features Provide connections between districts Bicycle access Distribute traffic from arterials and collector streets to local service streets Local transit service 13 TABLE 18.620.1 (Con't) Policy Classification Street Function Land Use/ Right-of-Way Street Design Priority Backage Road Local Collector Provide access to Mixed Use Commercial 60 feet local services and Retail along 99W 36 feet Distribute local traf- Access to off-street curb-to-curb fic parking Parking access street Enhanced pedestrian environment East-West Local Service Street Provide access to Mixed Use Commercial 60 feet Streets local services and Retail along 99W 34 feet Distribute local traf- Access to off-street curb-to-curb fic parking Parking access street Enhanced pedestrian environment North-South Local Service Street Provide access to Mixed Use Commercial 60 feet Streets local services and Retail along 99W 34 feet Distribute local traf- Access to off-street curb-to-curb tic parking Parking access street Enhanced pedestrian environment Chapter 18.705 ACCESS,EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures(see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Comment: In that a new structure is being proposed,the provisions of Chapter 18.705 apply. 18.705.030 General Provisions 14 A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Comment: Access, egress and circulation have been shown on Site Plan sheet C-1(exhibit A)Access to this project is proposed from Pacific Highway via the frontage road. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures,or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title,provided: D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Comment: The proposed building is accessible from Pacific Highway, a public road. This allows for full access for maintenance and use. E. Curb cuts.Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Comment: Curb cut is existing. F. Required walkway location.On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses,to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Comment: A sidewalk constructed to City standards will be constructed with location to be determined pending City staff consultation. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the Commission for review when, in the opinion of the Director,the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions;or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles;or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health,safety,and general welfare. Comment: No hazardous conditions are evident. H. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multi-family residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.1 and Table 18.705.2; 15 Comment: The proposed project is for commercial use. N/A I. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than 21 as provided in Table 18.705.3; TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Spaces Minimum Number of Minimum Access Width Minimum Pavement Driveways Required 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 _ 50' 40' curbs required Comment: The proposed project access point meets all requirements. J. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility;the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. Comment: There are no one-way access points N/A Chapter 18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Comment: The noise generated from this building will be primarily from the dryer area or east end exit. The proximity to any adjacent occupancy is outside required setbacks for natural diffusion of decibel standards. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park(IP)zoning district,there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)rules for visible emissions(340-21-015 and 340-28-070)apply. Comment: The emissions generated from this building will be primarily from the vehicle stacking area prior to entrance into the carwash.There are no point-source emissions. C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles,trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Comment: There are no elements of the facility that create vibrations. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors(340-028-090)apply. Comment: There are no odor emissions from the facility. 16 E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted,and; 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Comment: There are no glare or heat producing elements from the facility. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard.■ Comment: Trash will be stored I a manner not to attract insects or rodents Chapter 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public street, private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040 C. Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5 (Exhibit E), street trees will be planted in accordance with Chapter 18.745.040C. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5 (Exhibit E), street tree planting list will be in accordance with City of Tigard's standards. C. Size and spacing of street trees. 1. Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Subsection 2 below; Comment: Street trees along the Pacific Highway frontage are to be Hornbeam-2" caliper 2. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: a. Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; b. Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; c. Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; d. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040 H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection, nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility poles to maintain visual clearance; e. No new utility pole location shall be established closer than five feet to any existing street tree; 17 f. Tree pits shall be located so as not to include utilities(e.g.,water and gas meters)in the tree well; g. On-premises utilities(e.g.,water and gas meters)shall not be installed within existing tree well areas; h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards; i. New light standards shall not be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates,then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet; j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines; k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb;and 1. Trees shall not be planted within two feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway: (1) Space between the tree and the hard surface may be covered by a nonpermanent hard surface such as grates,bricks on sand,paver blocks and cobblestones;and (2) Sidewalk cuts in concrete for tree planting shall be at least four by four feet to allow for air and water into the root area. Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5 (Exhibit E), street tree planting list will be in accordance with City of Tigard's standards and all the above requirements. D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above local street, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030,using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020 C4a. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or other construction shall be replaced by the developer with those types of trees approved by the Director.The replacement trees shall be of a size and species similar to the trees that are being removed unless lesser sized alternatives are approved by the Director. G. Granting of adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure,as regulated in Section 18.390.030,using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020 C4b. H. Location of trees near signalized intersections. The Director may allow trees closer to specified intersections which are signalized,provided the provisions of Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance,are satisfied. Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5(Exhibit E),street tree planting will not interfere with utilities,grading etc. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 18 I. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site,without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles; 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening,shall be required as specified in the matrix; 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Comment: The matrices show no buffering standards C-G to C-G. B. Buffering and screening requirements. 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses; 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the City; 3. A fence,hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements,which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of 18.745.050 B8 and I8.745.050D; 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.1. In addition, improvements shall meet the following specifications: a. At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall have a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height above grade for deciduous trees and a minimum height of five feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing for trees shall be as follows: (1) Small or narrow-stature trees, under 25 feet tall or less than 16 feet wide at maturity shall be spaced no further than 15 feet apart; (2) Medium-sized trees between 25 feet to 40 feet tall and with 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; (3) Large trees, over 40 feet tall and with more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity, shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. b. In addition, at least 10 five-gallon shrubs or 20 one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of required buffer area; c. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover. 5. Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: a. A hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted which will form a four-foot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting; or 19 b. An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover;or c. A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. 6. Buffering and screening provisions shall be superseded by the vision clearance requirements as set forth in Chapter 18.795; 7. When the use to be screened is downhill from the adjoining zone or use, the prescribed heights of required fences, walls, or landscape screening shall be measured from the actual grade of the adjoining property. In this case, fences and walls may exceed the permitted six foot height at the discretion of the director as a condition of approval. When the grades are so steep so as to make the installation of walls, fences or landscaping to the required height impractical, a detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted for approval; 8. Fences and walls a. Fences and walls shall be constructed of any materials commonly used in the construction of fences and walls such as wood,stone,rock or brick,or otherwise acceptable by the Director; b. Such fence or wall construction shall be in compliance with other City regulations; c. Walls shall be a minimum of six inches thick; and d. Chain link fences with slats shall qualify for screening. However, chain link fences without slats shall require the planting of a continuous evergreen hedge to be considered screening. 9. Hedges a. An evergreen hedge or other dense evergreen landscaping may satisfy a requirement for a sight- obscuring fence where required subject to the height requirement in Sections 18.745.040 C2 a and b; b. Such hedge or other dense landscaping shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced with another hedge, other dense evergreen landscaping, or a fence when it ceases to serve the purpose of obscuring view;and c. No hedge shall be grown or maintained at a height greater than that permitted by these regulations for a fence or wall in a vision clearance area as set forth in Chapter 18.795. Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5 (Exhibit E), buffering requirements are either met by existing plantings or new plantings. E. Screening: special provisions. I. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; 20 (2) Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect;and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Comment: Parking area is not visible from the fronting street,Pacific Highway,or any adjacent properties. 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Comment: As shown on the Site Plan sheet C-1 (Exhibit A), masonry screened trash enclosure will be provided. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street,parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence,masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Comment: The trash enclosure will be constructed of masonry similar to the building construction. Six feet high. F. Buffer Matrix. 1. The Buffer Matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts; 2. An application for a variance to the standards required in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, shall be processed as a Type II procedure,as regulated by Section 18.390.040,using approval criteria in Section 18.370.010. Comment: The matrices show no buffering standards C-G to C-G. 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway;and 1. Such storage may not be located where it would cause suffocation of root systems of trees intended to be preserved; and 21 2. After completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. C. Methods of re-vegetation. 1. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro-mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates,and: a. Where lawn or turf grass is to be established, lawn grass seed or other appropriate landscape cover is to be sown at not less than four pounds to each 1,000 square feet of land area; b. Other re-vegetation methods offering equivalent protection may be approved by the approval authority; c. Plant materials are to be watered at intervals sufficient to ensure survival and growth;and d. The use of native plant materials is encouraged to reduce irrigation and maintenance demands.• Comment: As shown on the landscape plan sheet C-5 (Exhibit E), all areas disturbed by construction designated as landscaping will be re-vegetated. TABLE 18.745.1 BUFFER MATRIX PROPOSED USE Single Attached Attached Mobile Commerci Neighborho M Units, Single Single Home al od U: Detached; Units and Units Parks Zones Commercial Et Manufacture Multifamily, and (CC, Zone(CN) -n EXISTING/ABUTTING USE d 1-5 Units; Multifamil CG,CP, Units Duplexes y, CBD) 5+Units Detached Single Units; Manufactured -- A C C D C Units A -- B C D C Attached Single Units and Multifamily, A A -- C D C 1-5 Units,Duplexes Attached Single Units and A A B -- D C Multifamily, C C C C -- A 5+Units C C C C A -- Mobile Home Parks C C C C A A Commercial Zones(CC,CG,CP, D D D D A A CBD) Neighborhood Commercial Zone(CN) D D D D D D Mixed Use Employment Zone(MUE) C C C C -- -- Light Industrial Zones(IP, IL) A A A A -- -- Heavy Industrial Zone(IH) Parking Lots Arterial Streets Note: See Table 18.745.2 for alternative combinations for meeting these screening requirement Chapter 18.755 22 MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE 18.755.050 Location,Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location,design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance,described in 18.755.040 above. B. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C,design standards; 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; 2. Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; 4. Storage area(s)and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons. However,the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area,adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. • Comment: All applicable standards are satisfied by the location, orientation and construction materials as required by Chapter 18.755.040. 24 Chapter 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS 18.765.010 Purpose A. Insure adequate vehicle parking, These parking requirements are intended to provide sufficient vehicle parking in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers and employees, and to establish standards which will maintain the traffic carrying-capacity of nearby streets. B. Adequate capacity. These regulations are also intended is to establish vehicle parking areas which have adequate capacity and which are appropriately located and designed to minimize any hazardous conditions on the site and at access points. Comment: As shown on the Site Plan Exhibit A, off-street parking is provided at the rear of the building with one handicap accessible space adjacent to the entry along the west side of the building.The number of parking spaces is sufficient to serve a drive-thru facility. 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. E. Building permit conditions. The provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner: 1. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are presented to the Director to show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off-street vehicle parking and loading space;and 2. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of vehicle parking and loading space required by this title; 3. Required vehicle parking shall: a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger vehicles of residents,patron and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conduct of the business or use; and • c. Not be rented, leased or assigned to any other person or organization. 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access,egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s); 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: 25 a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses,structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay,subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est)use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. D. Parking in mixed-use projects. In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1. Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2. Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90%of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3. Subsequent use or uses,at 80%of the vehicle parking required for that use(s)in Section 18.765.060; 4. The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.l.-3. above. E. Visitor parking in multi-family residential developments. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15%of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized,signed and marked as required by these regulations. 26 Comment: This proposal provides the parking facilities sufficient for the use and in accordance with this section. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Comment: The parking facilities will be maintained by the owner in accordance with this section. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface;and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences,except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030P,groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. C. Loading/unloading driveways. A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. 27 D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. 1. All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1. TABLE 18.765.1 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS FOR USES WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOWS Use Reservoir Requirement Drive-in banks 150 feet/service terminal Automated teller 50 feet/service terminal machines Drive-up telephones 50 feet Drive-in cleaners,repair services 50 feet Drive-in restaurants 200 feet Drive-in theaters 200 feet Gasoline service 75 feet between curb cut and nearest pump Mechanical car washes 75 feet/washing unit Parking facilities: - Free flow entry 25 feet/entry driveway - Ticket dispense entry 50 feet/entry driveway - Manual ticket dispensing 100 feet/entry driveway - Attendant parking 100 feet 2. The Director may reduce the length of the inbound stacking lane by means of a adjustment to be reviewed through a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.320.300, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020 C5g. 3. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with parking and vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Stacking lanes for the purpose of selling food must provide at least one clearly marked parking space per service window for the use of vehicles waiting for an order to be filled. Comment: The vehicle stacking length of 75 feet can easily be provided in accordance with this section. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N. Comment' The curb cut at Pacific Highway is existing and in compliance with Section 18.810.030 N. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation,the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Comment: The pedestrian access ways are protected by curbing, detectable changes in texture at perpendicular crossings and landscape areas. G. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in 18.765.040 H3 and 4 below,all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle,boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces; 28 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The Director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area: a) within a specified period of time after establishment of the parking area; or b) if there is a change in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area; or c) if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, water courses, or properties. Such an agreement shall be executed as a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel parking area. Gravel-surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent with the following: a. Gravel parking areas shall not be permitted within 100 feet of any residentially-zoned or residentially-developed area; b. Gravel access and/or parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any water course; c. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any public right-of-way;and d. A driveway which connects a gravel parking area with any public street shall be paved. 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit is approved. The approval authority shall consider the following in determining whether or not the gravel-surfaced parking is warranted: a. The request for consideration to allow a parking area in conjunction with the temporary use shall be made in writing concurrently with the Temporary Use application per the requirements of Section 18.385.050; b. The applicant shall provide documentation that the type of temporary use requested will not be financially viable if the parking space surface area requirement is imposed;and c. Approval of the gravel-surfaced parking area will not create adverse conditions affecting safe ingress and egress when combined with other uses of the property. Comment: All drive and parking areas are paved with asphaltic concrete. Parking lot striping. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked;and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Comment: All drive and parking areas are area to be striped in accordance with this section. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. N/A K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off- street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Comment: Onsite drainage is configured to flow around any pedestrian areas. 29 L. Lighting. A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Comment: Site lighting will be installed to illuminate the building, walks and parking area. The lighting is arranged in such a manner as to preclude horizontal throw thereby eliminating glare . M. Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Comment: Instructional signs will be installed in accordance with Chapter 18.870. N. Space and aisle dimensions. (Figure 18.765.1) 1. Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: a. 8.5'x 18.5' for a standard space; b. 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space;and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for d . The width of each parking space includes a striae which separates each space. 30 2. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic,or allowing access from both ends,shall be 24 width; 3. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and m as noted in Figure 18.765.2. Comment: Parking stalls as shown on Exhibit A comply with the standards outline in this section. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street,directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible,bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground,wall or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 2-1/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remained well-drained. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking 3 1 spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020 C5e. Comment:Public uses of this building use is unlikely. Bicycle parking for employees is secured within the storage area of the main level. See Sheet A-2. 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards A. Ground-floor windows/wall openings. All parking structures shall provide ground floor windows or wall openings along the street frontages. Blank walls are prohibited. Any wall facing the street shall contain windows, doors or display areas equal to at least 20%of the ground floor wall area facing the street excluding those portions of the face(s) devoted to driveway entrances and exits, stairwells, elevators, and centralized payment booths. Required windows shall have a sill no more than four (4) feet above grade. Where the interior floor level prohibits such placement,the sill may be raised to allow it to be no more than two(2)feet above finished floor wall up to a maximum sill height of six(6)feet above grade. B. Exit warning bell. A warning bell or other signal must be provided for exits from parking structures that cross public sidewalks where a standard vision clearance area cannot be provided. C. Other standards. Parking structures must comply with all standards of the Uniform Building Code for the State of Oregon as it pertains to structural design, ventilation, lighting and fire/safety requirements and disabled accessibility. D. Parking layout and internal circulation. The layout of parking within a parking structure shall be subject to the requirements contained in Figure 18.765.2. An applicant may request approval of an alternative layout and internal circulation by means of a Type 11 adjustment, as governed in Section 18.370.010, using the approval criteria in Section 18.370.020 C5f. Comment: There are no parking structures proposed therefore this section is not applicable. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. 1. The Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's Interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340; 2. The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. B. Choice of parking requirements. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. C. Measurements. The following measurements shall be used in calculating the total minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. Fractions. Fractional space requirements shall be counted as a whole space; 2. Employees. Where employees are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the employees counted are those who work on the premises-during the largest shift at the peak season; 3. Students. When students are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the students counted are those who are on the campus during the peak period of the day during a typical school term; 32 4. Space. Unless otherwise specified,where square feet are specified,the area measured shall be gross floor area under the roof measured from the faces of the structure, excluding only space devoted to covered off-street parking or loading. D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in Section 18.765.070H: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement; 2. Fleet parking. Required vehicle parking spaces may not be used for storage of fleet vehicles, except when a use can show that employee and fleet parking spaces are used interchangeably,e.g.,the employee drives the fleet vehicle from home, or the spaces are used for fleet storage only at night and are available for employee use during the day. For the purposes of this title, space exclusively devoted to the storage of fleet vehicles will be considered as outdoor storage. E. Exceptions to maximum parking standards. When calculating the maximum vehicle parking allowed as regulated by Section 18.765.080H,the following exception shall apply: 1. The following types of parking shall not be included: a. Parking contained in a parking structure either incorporated into a building or free-standing; b. Market-rate paid parking; c. Designated carpool and/or vanpool spaces; d. Designated disabled-accessible parking spaces; e. Fleet parking. 2. If application of the maximum parking standard would result in less than six parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 gross square feet of floor area,the development shall be allowed up to six parking spaces. If application of the maximum parking standard would result in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and 2,000 gross square feet,the development will be allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. F. Reductions in minimum required vehicle parking. Reductions in the required number of vehicle parking spaces may be permitted as follows: 1. The Director may reduce off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070H by up to 20%in new developments for the incorporation of transit-related facilities such as bus stops and pull-outs, bus shelters, transit-oriented developments and other transit-related development through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020 C5b. Applicants who qualify for this adjustment may also apply for further parking reductions per 18.765.070 F.2.below; 2. The Director may reduce the total required off-street vehicle parking spaces per Section 18.765.070H by up to a total of 20% by means of parking adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040,using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020 C5a. 3. The Director is authorized to reduce up to 10% of existing required parking spaces at a conversion ratio of one parking space for each 100 square feet of transit facility for developments which incorporate transit-related facilities such as bus stops and pull-outs, bus shelters, transit-oriented development or other transit-related facilities through a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020 C5c. 33 G. Increases in maximum required vehicle parking. The Director may increase the total maximum number of vehicle spaces allowed in Section 18.765.070H by means of a parking adjustment to be reviewed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in section 18.370.020 C5d. H. Specific requirements. (See Table 18.765.2) Comment: Parking requirements for uses such as this are predominantly driven by employee requirements. In addition to the vacuum spaces, parking for the two employees is provided. 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. B. Off-street loading dimensions. 1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location; 2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site; 3. Entrances and exits for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710; 4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. Comment: There are no delivery/loading requirements for this facility therefore this section is not applicable. Table 18.765.2 Minimum and Maximum Required Off-street Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Requirements MAXI MINIMUM ZONE A I. ZOl RESIDENTIAL Household Living Single Units,Attached See Multifamily(M) none(M) none(M) Single Units,Detached 1.0/DU none(M) none(M) Accessory Units 1.0/DU none none Duplexes 34 Multifamily Units DU<500 sq ft: 1.0/DU(M) none(M) none(M) 1 bedroom: 1.25/DU(M) 2 bedroom: 1.5/DU(M) 3 bedroom: 1.75/DU(M) Manufactured Units 1.0/DU(M) none(M) none(M) Mobile Home Parks I.0/DU(M) none(M) none(M) Group Living 1.0/room none none 1.0/2.5 beds 2.7/1,000131 none Transitional Housing 1.0/2.5 beds none none Home Occupation none none none CIVIC Basic Utilities none none none Colleges 1.0/5 students/staff(M) 1.0/3.3 students/staff(M) 1.0/3.3 students/ Community Recreation 2.0/1,000 2.5/1,000 4.0/1,000 Cultural Institutions 2.5/1,000 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 Day Care Home: none none none Commercial: 2.0/classroom 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 Emergency Services 3.0/1,000 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 Medical Centers 2.0/1,000[41 2.7/1,000141 3.2/1,000141 NA: Not Addressed 1j1 To be determined by the City of Tigard based on Metro criteria. DU: Dwelling Unit 121 Required bicycle parking shall be required per the ratios below except in no case shall there be fewer than two space provided. (M): Metro Requirement 131 Refers to 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area,unless otherwise noted. 141 Does not include outpatient clinics or medical offices;see Medical/Dental Offices. Chapter 18.790 TREE REMOVAL 18.790.30 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting,removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition,site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. B. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting,removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition,site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Comment: Refer to the Existing Conditions Plan Exhibit D which shows all existing trees.A survey of the site was conducted and included all trees greater than 6 inches. 35 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping,streets and parking lots: Comment: One tree over 12" will have to be removed. This tree will be mitigated per City requirements. A landscape plan is provided describing trees to be planted with this development. d. Retention of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. Comment: One tree over 12" will have to be removed. This represents a greater than 75% retention. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; Comment: All trees designated for removal are shown on existing conditions plan Exhibit D. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Comment: All trees to remain are to be protected with fencing at the drip line as recommended by our Arborist. C. Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060D. Comment: All trees designated for removal are shown on existing conditions plan Exhibit D. Chapter 18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements Comment: There are no intersections that this criteria would apply to. All access points are existing. Chapter 18.810 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. I. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does 36 not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. 4 Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter; 5. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets;or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the City Engineer pursuant to Section 18.810.020.B. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030 E.1. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Comment: There are no further improvements required by ODOT at this time. Street improvements at Pacific Highway are in compliance with this section. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the Council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, provided that such street is deemed essential by the Council for the purpose of general traffic circulation: 1. The Council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without full compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions or major partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the Council to be present: a. Establishment of a street is initiated by the Council and is found to be essential for the purpose of general traffic circulation, and partitioning or subdivision of land has an incidental 37 effect rather than being the primary objective in establishing the road or street for public use; or b. The tract in which the road or street is to be dedicated is an isolated ownership of one acre or less and such dedication is recommended by the Commission to the Council based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title governing the control of subdivisions or major partitions. 2. With each application for approval of a road or street right-of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and major partition approval: a. The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary to enable the Commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for approval by the Council shall be made; b. The recommendation, if any, shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the purpose of this title; c. The Commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the Council may attach conditions which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title;and 3. All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the City and shall name "the public," as grantee. Comment: There are no further rights of way required by ODOT at this time. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can be created: 1. Access easements shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Section 10.207; 2. Access shall be in accordance with Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.0301. Comment: There are no access easements required by ODOT at this time. D. Street location, width and grade. Except as noted below, the location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: I. Street grades shall be approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Subsection M below; and 2. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street plan,the arrangement of streets in a development shall either: a. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas,or b. Conform to a plan adopted by the Commission, if it is impractical to conform to existing street patterns because of particular topographical or other existing conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. Comment: Existing streets 38 E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street, street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The City Council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) These are presented in Table 18.810.1. 1. The decision-making body shall make its decision about desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the various street types within the subdivision or development after consideration of the following: a. The type of road as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Chapter- Functional Street Classification; b. Anticipated traffic generation; c. On-street parking needs; d. Sidewalk and bikeway requirements; e. Requirements for placement of utilities; f. Street lighting; g. Drainage and slope impacts; h. Street tree location; i. Planting and landscape areas; j. Safety and comfort for motorists,bicyclists,and pedestrians; k. Access needs for emergency vehicles. TABLE 18.810.1 MINIMUM RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND STREET WIDTHS Type of Street Right-of-Way Roadway Moving Lanes Width(feet) Width (feet) Arterial 60'-90' 12'/lane 2-4 Major Collector _ 60'-80' 44' 2-4 Minor Collector 60' 40' 2-3 Local Street-Commercial and Industrial 50' 34' 2 Residential Access Streets a. Through street with: • Less Than 1500 ADT 50' 32' 2 • Less Than 500 ADT 46' 28' 1-2 • Less Than 200 ADT 42' 24' 1-2 b. Cul-de-sac dead-end streets: • Less Than 500 ADT 46' 28' 1-2 • Less Than 200 ADT 42' 24' 1-2 39 (Cul-de-sacs shall be no more than 200 feet long and serve no more than 20 dwelling units) Tum-Arounds for Dead-end Streets in 50' radius 42' radius Industrial and Commercial Zones Only Turn-Arounds for Cul-de-sac Dead-End 47' radius 40' radius Streets in Residential Zones Only Alley: Residential 16' 16' Alley: Business or Industrial 20' 20' F. Future street plan and extension of streets. N/A G. Street alignment and connections. N/A Comment: The existing frontage road will be the road/street that will receive buffering elements. Q. Alleys,public or private. N/A R. Survey monuments. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. S. Private Streets. . N/A 1. Design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer;and 2. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. 3. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments,mobile home parks,and multi-family residential developments. T. Railroad crossings. . . N/A U. Street signs. _ N/A V. Mailboxes. N/A W. Traffic signals. N/A X. Street light standards. N/A Y. Street name signs. N/A Z. Street cross-sections N/A 18.810.040 Blocks N/A 40 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers,drainage,water mains,electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. Comment: All easements that may be required for utilities will be granted pending final utility alinements. 18.810.060 Lots N/A 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development,even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. N/A B. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of any arterial or collector street where parking is prohibited adjacent to the curb, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way;the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; or it would conflict with the utilities. N/A C. Sidewalks in central business district. In the central business district, sidewalks shall be 10 feet in width,and: 1. All sidewalks shall provide a continuous unobstructed path;and 2. The width of curbside sidewalks shall be measured from the back of the curb. N/A D. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. Comment: Property owner will maintain all required walks and planter strips. E. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering department to so build or construct: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: 41 a. Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of time; b. Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; c. Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of the street;or d. Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes construction of a sidewalk impractical or economically infeasible;and 3. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. F. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances: I. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from school and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 2. A safety hazard exists for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other general pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 3. 50% or more of the area in a given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings,commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks;and 4. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under Section E.1.b above no longer exists and a sidewalk could be constructed in conformance with City standards.(Ord. 99-22) Comment: None of the above criteria are applicable. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas N/A 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or Hearings Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. 42 Comment: This project will require connection to the existing sanitary sewer currently serving the existing building. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made,and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street;and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. Comment: This is proposing and independent storm water transport and treatment design for discharge into an existing ODOT drainage facility. B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse,drainageway, channel or stream,there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance. Comment: There is an existing channelized flow facility that traverses the property from the right of way areas east of the subject. This channel will be piped under parking area improvements. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Comment: There is an existing channelized flow facility that traverses the property from the right of way areas east of the subject. This channel will be piped under parking area improvements. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Comment: The storm system discharges to an ODOT facility. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. Comment: This development does not adjoin any bike pathways. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed 43 underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above,and: 1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; 2. The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; 3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets;and 4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Comment: There appear to be overhead distribution system that parallel the property frontage within the ODOT right-of way. All facility services are proposed to be underground in compliance with this section. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information,easements for all underground utility facilities,and: 1. Plans showing the location of all underground facilities as described herein shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval;and 2. Care shall be taken in all cases to ensure that above ground equipment does not obstruct vision clearance areas for vehicular traffic. Comment: Refer to Site Utility Plan sheet C-3 for locations of undergound services. NOTE: As established within this narrative, the request for Site Design Review of the Carbuck's Carwash plans satisfy all relevant criteria. The applicant requests approval of this application. 44 7f& Jhipacl 5tuct5 CARBUCKS CAR WASH - HIGHWAY 99W TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TIGARD, OREGON PREPARED BY LANCASTER ENGINEERING MAY 2001 o V3: Y v ' STER ENGINEERING 4...•• . . udies • Planning • Salel, g r MOM moo mootin'4� y,4::&;{:, t ivy: WOW x' y i'gyo,ii, <��,.. iim CARBUCKS CAR WASH - HIGHWAY 99W y., K `:.i % sx Traffic Impact Study a:Y s' < W% Tigard, Oregon p'!v4-i.'fit4,,:k*:: akr .\ ; Iff0400 y �Svg •I :, Cif N :•f.:• 4 , X6,,4 MganiM r'''''''i MOWN '4f,,q*:*::::::,:* 0 ,„.(5)1= 0 k ti, Inn nfv.G4�ryry'rf'+,iin ky: y`p�r ii?1 t;: M I::S S:yi±tiii. .0 t: ONO Prepared By n ,41c4 :,:k, ...,.. TOM R. LANCASTER, PE, PTOE 'i`!'"t""'"'' TODD E. MOBLEY, EIT ti • K w� April 2001 ihr 1t ' tion,Suite 206 • 800 N.W.6th Avenue • Portland,OR 97209 • Phone(503)248-0313 • FAX(503)248-9251 LANCASTER ENGINEERING TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Location Description 5 Trip Generation 8 Trip Distribution 11 Operational Analysis 15 Appendix 21 -2- LANCASTER ENGINEERING SUMMARY 1. The proposed car wash is expected to generate an absolute maximum of 132 drive- way trips during the morning and evening peak hours. Of these, 72 will be entering and 60 will be exiting the site. Approximately 42 percent of the driveway trips will be pass-by trips, and the remainder will be new trips to the roadway network in the imme- diate vicinity of the site. These trip generation estimates represent a very worst case scenario in which the car wash is operating at capacity for the entire peak hour. Realis- tically, Carbucks Carwash expects a total of 100 vehicles per day, or 200 daily trip ' ends, on an average weekday. 2. The intersection of Highway 99W at the frontage road (site access) is under ODOT jurisdiction and is currently operating at acceptable volume-to-capacity ratios during both peak hours. With the proposed Carbucks car wash in place, the maximum allow- able v/c ratio of 0.95 will easily be satisfied during both the morning and evening peak hours. -3- LANCASTER ENGINEERING INTRODUCTION An automated car wash has been proposed for a site on the southeast corner of the Highway 217 interchange with Highway 99W in Tigard, Oregon. The purpose of this study is to assess the traffic impact of the proposed devel- opment on the nearby street system and to recommend any required mitigative meas- ures. The analysis will include level of service calculations and a discussion of site ac- cess. Detailed information on level of service, traffic counts, trip generation calcula- tions, and level of service calculations is included in the appendix to this report. -4- LANCASTER ENGINEERING LOCATION DESCRIPTION The site is located on the southeast corner of the Highway 217 interchange with Highway 99W in Tigard, Oregon. It is currently occupied by a vacant building that was previously a veterinarian clinic. The site is served by a frontage road along the south side of Highway 99W. The frontage road accesses Highway 99W via an unsig- nalized intersection located approximately half way between the Highway 217 northbound ramps and Dartmouth Street. A vicinity map showing the proposed site and the existing lane configuration in the vicinity of the site is on page six. City of Tigard staff have indicated that the traffic study should be prepared ac- cording to the requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) since the frontage road as well as Highway 99W is under their jurisdiction. Accordingly, ODOT staff has indicated the traffic impact study should address the intersection of the frontage road access to Highway 99W, particularly with respect to the volume-to- capacity (v/c) ratio and traffic queuing on Highway 99W during the morning and eve- ning peak hours. Highway 99W is a five-lane roadway that is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. It is classified as a Statewide Highway. There are bikes lanes, curbs, and sidewalks in place in the vicinity of the site. An access to the parallel frontage road forms a four- , legged, unsignalized intersection with Highway 99W. A driveway to a Home Life Furniture store forms the fourth leg of the intersection. Traffic on the driveway and the frontage road access is controlled by stop signs. The site is directly served on Highway 99W by Tri-Met Routes 64X and 12. A bus stop is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of Highway 99W and the frontage road access. Manual turning movement counts were made at the study area intersection in April 2001, from 7:00 to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. The peak hours are from 7:00 to 8:00 AM and from 4:45 to 5:45 PM. The morning and evening peak hour volumes are shown in the traffic flow diagram on page seven. -5- rA ',6-7' ��p' Homelife Furniture \moo '' ' • HIGHWAY 99W `0' Fronto.e Rood f •0. Car •o• a Toys PROJECT SITE t co Z N HWY 217 3 \ / -z NB On Romp Z 3 Costco E / \ o` O LEGEND p. Traffic Signal o y Stop Sign ,N, No Scale VICINITY MAP Existing Lane Configurations `;`LANCASTER ENGINEERING & Traffic Control Devices cb99w1.dwg -6- ti� 'yam Homelife p Furniture 1 l ��° HIGHWAY 99W ] L N Fronto.e Rood `. Car o Toys cc PROJECT ° I m Z SITE N N HWY 217 >- NB On Romp z \ / o Costco ? 0 —o- 1194 Nov F— 1981 � FJ . 1 .C° E�1y .C° 14 - i1rr K-i �Tr) 2044 —j 000 -) o00 1-, iy AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR lkir No Scale 1r TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Conditions LANCASTER ENGINEERING AM & PM Peak Hours cb99w.dwg LANCASTER ENGINEERING TRIP GENERATION Peak Hour Trips The manual, TRIP GENERATION, Sixth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), does not have data for an automated drive-through car wash, so other information was used to estimate the total driveway volumes for this type of land use. For a worst-case analysis, it was estimated that the theoretical maxi- mum trip generation for a car wash would be approximately equal to the service rate, or the number of cars that could be serviced by the car wash per hour at maximum capac- ity. The maximum theoretical service rate, based on information provided by the devel- oper, is 60 cars per hour. There is a period of time when the arrival rate could exceed the service rate, and on-site queuing will occur. For this site, it was assumed that the maximum on-site queue would be approximately 12 vehicles waiting to enter the car wash building. The potential hourly demand is therefore 72 cars per hour for a one-hour period. It was as- sumed that the departure rate is equal to the service rate, although the site will have an area for inspection or vacuuming that will also have a maximum queue storage. How- ever, the departure rate is still estimated at 60 cars per hour. Thus, the site is expected to have a maximum potential trip generation of 132 cars per hour, with 72 cars arriving and 60 cars departing. Retail land uses typically experience a portion of the total site trips as pass-by trips or diverted linked trips. Pass-by trips are momentary diversions from the adjacent street (Highway 99W) traffic to visit the site before continuing in the original direction of travel. Diverted linked trips are diversions from an nearby street (Dartmouth) to visit the site before continuing in the original direction of travel. Both types of trips are in conjunction with a trip to a primary destination, such as work or home. These trips are not new trips to the roadway network, but are a percentage of the total driveway vol- umes for retail land uses. The TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, October 1998, does not have data for this land use, but it was assumed that a car wash would have similar pass-by percentages as a gas station. Table 5-12 of the TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK shows the average pass-by percentage for a gas station as 42 percent. This is the percentage that will be used in this study. The proposed car wash has excellent transit service, but it is not likely that pa- trons of the car wash would leave their cars at home to visit the site. The only likely -8- LANCASTER ENGINEERING transit usage would be by employees, and would be minimal compared to the total peak hour trip generation. Although the trip generation of the car wash is expected to be minimal during the morning peak hour, the assumptions discussed previously were used for both the morning and evening peak hours. Average Weekday Trips It is important to distinguish between peak hour trip generation, which is used for the operational analysis, and weekday trip generation. The trip generation de- scribed in the previous section is absolute worst case, with the car wash operating at its theoretical maximum service rate for the entire peak hour. This trip generation is likely overestimated, but the assumptions were used to examine absolute worst-case condi- tions. Based on the experience of Carbucks Carwash and their comparisons with sites of similar characteristics, the subject site is expected to generate approximately 100 ve- hicles, or 200 trip ends, on an average weekday. As a comparison, the proposed car- wash was assumed to be similar to a two-bay self service carwash. Based on land-use code 847 in the Trip Generation manual, a two-bay self service car wash would gener- ate a total of 216 daily trips. This supports the expectation of 200 daily trips for the proposed site. A summary of the trip generation calculations is shown in the following table. The trip generation calculations are included in the appendix to this report. -9- tt LANCASTER ENGINEERING , TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Carbucks Car Wash - Highway 99W Entering Exiting Total Trips Trips Trips AM & PM Peak Hours 72 60 132 Pass-By* -30 -30 -60 Total New Trips 42 30 72 Weekday 100 100 200 *Includes diverted linked trips. -10- I., LANCASTER ENGINEERING TRIP DISTRIBUTION The directional distribution of the new trips generated by the proposed land use was estimated from the proximity and density of residential development within an ap- proximate one-mile radius of the site. The traffic flow diagram on page 12 shows the distribution of the projected new site-generated trips for the proposed car wash for the evening peak hour. Pass-by trips are in direct proportion to the volume of traffic passing the site. The traffic flow diagrams on pages 13 and 14 show the new and pass-by site trips for the morning and evening peak hours. Negative volumes indicate pass-by or diverted linked trips that visit the site and return in the original direction of travel. -11- ti4, 'L' Homelife p Furniture \-pc>, <40%D 160%D HIGHWAY 99W 1 1 J L r Fronto.e Rood I` 0 Cor 0 Toys 8- PROJECT ire! SITE N u) HWY 217 \ / -c NB On Romp 2 a Costco E / \ a 0 +. No Scale PRIMARY SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Inbound & Outbound Percentages "LANCASTER ENGINEERING AM & PM Peak Hours cb99w.dwg -12- ti .o� p� HIGHWAY 99W Homeli(e Furniture 1 1 ] [ _. 1\ Fronto.e Rood Cor o Toys ct PROJECT SITE Z N (n HWY 217 >- w NB On Romp 2 \ / o Costco E \ o O �o �o 000 E— 000 �0 ��y X43 J\ L NV 43 0TfiT0 01\ EiTr 0 --j voco' 0 —j vow 29-1 cv 29 N AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ,N, No Scale !!! ''.!::..1-1:1 If TRAFFIC VOLUMES Primary Site Trips '.CASTER ENGINEERING AM & PM Peak Hours cb99w.dwg -13- ti h- l cj 1. Homel;fe p Furniture HIGHWAY 99W 1 1 JL N Fronto.e Rood Cor o Toys cc PROJECT N. SITE Z v N (n HWY 217 > r NB On Romp 2 o Costco E o 0 to to 000 E- -11 000 E- -15 E-11 y 1 1 <-11 y .c 15 oi' <-1TO o -7' Tr� -19 -- :orn -15 -- 'noun 19-4, 15 � AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR AI lksir No Scale TRAFFIC VOLUMES Pass—By Site Trips LANCASTER ENGINEERING AM & PM Peak Hours cb99w.dwg -14 LANCASTER ENGINEERING OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Background Traffic There are several developments either approved or under construction in the vi- cinity of the nearby Tigard Triangle. None of the developments will add traffic to the frontage road access, but vehicles will be added to the through traffic on Highway 99W. Rather than identify each development and extrapolate the traffic volumes on the highway adjacent to the proposed car wash site, a three percent per year growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes for one year. It is expected that the pro- posed car wash would be constructed and operational in the near future, therefore one year of growth is adequate to address the increase in traffic on Highway 99W. A traffic flow diagram showing the background traffic volumes for the morning and evening peak hours is shown on page 16. The diagram on page 17 shows the total of background traffic plus the site-generated traffic from the proposed Carbucks car wash. -15- 'S- 4--)_, _, j 1-,9 Homelife p� Furniture -o HIGHWAY 99W 1 I J [ .. 1 Fronto•e Rood Cor o Toys PROJECT .........9 ° SITE ID Z ii ` N (n HWY 217 )-' NS On Romp z \ / o Costco E o 0 0o— f 1229 Nov 2040 14 : 'I' 14 22 is �1T0 2105 —› 000 2081 000 1� 0-q, AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR /41 ,NI No Scale ;,.,.'.... TRAFFIC VOLUMES f Background Traffic LANCASTER ENGINEERING AM & PM Peak Hours cb99w.dwg 16- ti*- 26, Homelife 0' Furniture .o HIGHWAY 99W 1 I ] L 1\ Fronto.e Rood El- Car o E 0 cc PROJECT Toys � � z SITE •N (n HWY217 \ / , NB On Romp 2 0 Costco E \ o` 0 t 5 a, t 6 o- E- 1218 Nov- E-2025 I (-I 11-) .0 54 (-II -. 58 14 -T (-I Tr) 22 (-I T O 2086 ,,'quo,` 2066 —! Oo,n 49-1 44 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR 41 lkir No Scale . ........... .............. . ..... fi TRAFFIC VOLUMES Background + Site Trips �1 . .. AM & PM Peak Hours fASTER ENGINEERING cb99w.dwg -17- LANCASTER ENGINEERING Capacity Analysis To determine the level of service at the study area intersection, a capacity analy- sis was conducted. The level of service can range from A, which indicates very little or no delay, to level F, which indicates a high degree of congestion and delay. The analy- sis was made for existing conditions, background conditions, and background plus site- generated traffic. Since the study area intersection is under ODOT jurisdiction, the capacity analy- sis was done with respect to volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios. However, for informa- tional purposes for the City of Tigard, the delay and level of service is also reported. Highway 99W is classified by ODOT as a Statewide Highway, and the maxi- mum allowable v/c ratio is 0.95, as shown in Table 7 the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. This v/c standard applies to traffic on Highway 99W as well as traffic on the minor- street approaches. The study area intersection was analyzed using the signalized intersection meth- ods in the 2000 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL, Special Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board. The results of the capacity analysis show that all movements at the intersection of Highway 99W and the frontage road access/Home Life Furniture driveway are cur- rently operating at acceptable v/c ratios. For background traffic conditions the v/c ra- tios for all movements will continue to be quite low. With the proposed car wash in place the northbound approach (frontage road access) will experience the largest v/c ratios. This leg of the intersection will still operate well within the maximum v/c of 0.95 with the car wash in place. The traffic counts show that there is currently no traf- fic in or out of the frontage road access, therefore there are no results for this leg of the intersection or the westbound left-turning movement for existing and background condi- tions. A complete sununary of the level of service, delay, and v/c ratio of each move- ment that must stop or yield right-of-way is shown in the following table. Information on level of service and delay is included for informational purposes for the City of Ti- gard. Since the intersection is under the jurisdiction of ODOT, the v/c ratios and ODOT operational standards are the pertinent factors for assessment of the intersection operation. Tables showing the relationships between delay and level of service are in- cluded in the appendix to this report. -18- 'IE LANCASTER ENGINEERING CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY Carbucks Car Wash - 99W Highway 99W at Frontage Road Access/Home Life Furniture Driveway AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c Existing Conditions Westbound Left Turn - - - - - - Eastbound Left Turn B 11 0.02 B/C 15 0.06 Frontage Road Access - - - - - - Home Life Driveway* C 21 0.00 D 32 0'.03 Background Traffic Westbound Left Turn - - - - - - Eastbound Left Turn B 11 0.02 C 16 0.06 Frontage Road Access - - - - - - Home Life Driveway* C 23 0.01 E 37 0.03 Background + Site Trips Westbound Left Turn C 17 0.16 C 17 0.16 Eastbound Left Turn B 12 0.02 C 16 0.06 Frontage Road Access D 34 0.43 E 36 0,45 Home Life Driveway* E 35 0.01 F 56 0.05 * Delay, LOS, and v/c reported for soutbound left-turns LOS = Level of service Delay = Average delay per vehicle in seconds v/c = Volume-to-capacity ratio Traffic Queuing and Congestion At the request of ODOT staff, observations were made at the study area inter- section during the morning and evening peak hours with respect to queuing on Highway 99W from nearby intersections. The intersection of Dartmouth Street forms a four- legged signalized intersection approximately 500 feet east of the frontage road access. Traffic queues from this intersection were observed to extend beyond the frontage road access on occasion during both peak hours. Traffic queues from the Highway 217 -19- LANCASTER ENGINEERING northbound ramp intersection were not observed to,extend to the frontage road access during either peak hour. With the proposed car wash on site, there will be a noticeable amount of new traffic on the frontage road access. With this increase in side-street traffic, it is likely that drivers on Highway 99W will leave a gap at the frontage road access intersection when traffic queues from Dartmouth become severe. Congestion is prominent along Highway 99W through Tigard during the peak hours, and it is not uncommon for queues from signalized intersections to extend beyond side street intersections and driveways. It is also important to note that while the nearby signal at Dartmouth Street may cause long queues during portions of the peak hours, it, along with the nearby signal to the west, causes significant platooning in traffic on Highway 99W. For traffic turning left from the frontage road access, there are often long gaps available where several ve- hicles could make the left-turning movement. This platooning on the highway is one reason that the side-street traffic is expected to operate at favorable v/c ratios, even with the large volume of through traffic on the highway. If traffic queues from Dartmouth were to temporarily block the frontage road access, westbound traffic waiting to turn left into the site would wait in the left-turn lane and would not impede westbound through traffic. Also, traffic exiting the frontage road wouldl queue up on the minor street and will not impede traffic on Highway 99W. -20- LANCASTER ENGINEERING APPENDIX -?1 LANCASTER ENGINEERING LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of service A to C are considered good, and rural roads are usually designed for level of service C. Urban streets and signalized intersections are typically designed for level of service D. Level of service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E is generally considered acceptable. Here is a more complete description of levels of service: Level of service A: Very low delay at intersections, with all traffic signal cycles clearing and no vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle. On highways, low volume and high speeds, with speeds not restricted by other vehicles. Level of service B: Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; short traffic delays at intersections. Higher average intersection delay than for level of service A resulting from more vehicles stopping. Level of service C: Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other traffic; higher delays at intersections than for level of service B due to a signifi- cant number of vehicles stopping. Not all signal cycles clear the waiting vehicles. This is the recommended design standard for rural highways. Level of service D: Tolerable operating speeds; long traffic delays occur at in- , tersections. The influence of congestion is noticeable. At traffic signals many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. The number of signal cycle failures, for which vehicles must wait through more than one signal cycle, are noticeable. This is typically the design level for urban signalized intersections. Level of service E: Restricted speeds, very long traffic delays at traffic signals, and traffic volumes near capacity. Flow is unstable so that any interruption, no matter how minor, will cause queues to form and service to deteriorate to level of service F. Traffic signal cycle failures are frequent occurrences. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E or better is generally considered acceptable. Level of service F: Extreme delays, resulting in long queues which may interfere with other traffic movements. There may be stoppages of long duration, and speeds may drop to zero. There may be frequent signal cycle failures. Level of service F will typically result when vehicle arrival rates are greater than capacity. It is considered unacceptable by most drivers. LANCASTER ENGINEERING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL CONTROL DELAY OF PER VEHICLE SERVICE (Seconds) A < 10 B 10-20 C 20-35 D 35-55 E 55-80 F >80 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL CONTROL DELAY OF PER VEHICLE SERVICE (Seconds) A < 10 B 10-15 C 15-25 D 25-35 E 35-50 F >50 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT HIGHWAY 99W @ HOMELIFE FURNITURE DRIVEWAY/FRONTAGE ROAD • T= 3 .2% P=.678 N I19 • DATE OF COUNT: 04/10/01 O + I19 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 18 0 1 TIME STARTED: 07:00 T TIME ENDED: 09 :00 H 1-1212 4-I I 4 i-1199 • i • 14 -I L5 T= 3 .8% T= 6.4% 2044—► 4-1194 P=. 939 P=.851 1 _[0 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • • T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH �3 I 14' P=PHF BY APPROACH 2059—► 2045—■ DLAF 0 0 0 Peak Hour I1 • 07:05-08:05 Traffic Smith TEV=3277 i T= 0% P=0. IO V=3277 (503) 641-633 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • FROM - TO ; —► J 4J i I Lo. 41 I rFlo. r •— L ALL 07:00-07:05 0 143 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 0 201 07:05-07:10 0 176 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 260 07:10-07:15 0 154 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 234 07:15-07:20 0 168 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 92 0 265 07:20-07:25 1 166 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 264 07:25-07:30 0 171 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 1 279 07:30-07:35 0 186 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 1 278 07:35-07:40 0 173 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 1 294 07:40-07:45 0 187 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 1 276 07:45-07:50 0 172 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 1 295 07:50-07 :55 0 176 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 282 07:55-08 :00 0 164 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 297 08 :00-08 :05 0 151 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 253 08 :05-08 :10 0 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 1 245 08 :10-08 :15 0 136 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 244 08 :15-08 :20 0 145 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 119 0 266 08:20-08 :25 0 152 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 235 08:25-08 :30 0 127 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 1 258 08:30-08 :35 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 1 211 08:35-08 :40 1 144 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 222 08:40-08 :45 0 151 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 2 255 08:45-08 :50 0 142 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 217 08:50-08 :55 0 153 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 265 08 :55-09:00 2 151 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 1 263 Total Survey 4 3743 24 29 0 2 0 0 0 0 2346 11 6159 PHF .25 .94 .5 .75 0 .25 0 0 0 0 .85 .42 . 937 Trucks 25 3 .8 0 3 .4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 .4 9.1 4 .8 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Peds 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Hourly Totals 07:00-08 :00 1 2036 15 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 1150 5 3225 07:15-08 :15 1 1981 15 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1253 6 3272 07:30-08 :30 0 1900 13 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 1292 6 3223 07:45-08 :45 1 1773 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 1261 6 3063 08 :00-09 :00 3 1707 9 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 1196 6 2934 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT PEAK HOUR REPORT HIGHWAY 99W @ HOMELIFE FURNITURE DRIVEWAY/FRONTAGE ROAD • T= 6 .3% P=.571 N 116 • DATE OF COUNT: 04/10/01 O I21 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 15 0 1 TIME STARTED: 07:00 T TIME ENDED: 09:00 H i-1268 41 I L. 4-1259 • + A 15 J L6 T= 4 .1% T= 4 .8% 1981—► 4-1253 P=. 911 P=.894 1 ; 0 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • r T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH �l I �► P=PHF BY APPROACH 1997—► 1982—■ DLAF 0 0 0 Peak Hour I1 ♦ 07:15-08:15 Traffic Smithy i T= 0% P=0. I0 TEV=3272 (503) 641-6333 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD FROM - TO ; —► 3 AJ I Lo. 11 I r• r 1— L i ALL ALL VEHICLES 07:15-07:30 1 505 4 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 290 1 808 07:30-07:45 0 546 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 3 848 07:45-08 :00 0 512 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 351 1 874 08 :00-08:15 0 418 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 319 1 742 LIGHT TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT 2 AXLES) 07 :15-07:30 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 29 07:30-07:45 0 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 25 07:45-08:00 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 20 08 :00-08:15 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 18 MEDIUM TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT > 2 AXLES) 07:15-07:30 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 07:30-07:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 07:45-08 :00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 :00-08 :15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 HEAVY TRUCKS (SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER) 07:15-07:30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 11 07:30-07:45 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 07:45-08 :00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 10 08 :00-08 :15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 10 BICYCLES 07:15-07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30-07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45-08 :00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 :00-08 :15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 PEDESTRIANS CROSSWALK USEAGE ALL SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH 07:15-07:30 0 0 0 0 0 07:30-07:45 0 0 0 1 1 07:45-08 :00 0 0 0 0 0 08 :00-08 :15 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour by Movement PHF .25 .91 .54 .63 0 .25 0 0 0 0 .89 .5 . 935 % Trucks (all) 0 4 .1 0 6 .7 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 .8 16 .7 4.4 % Trucks (M+H) 0 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0 1.6 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 07:00-08:00 1 2036 15 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 1150 5 3225 07:15-08:15 1 1981 15 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1253 6 3272 07:30-08:30 0 1900 13 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 1292 6 3223 07:45-08:45 1 1773 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 1261 6 3063 08:00-09:00 3 1707 9 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 1196 6 2934 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT HIGHWAY 99W AT HOMELIFE FURNITURE DRIVEWAY/FRONTAGE ROAD - • T= 0% P=.687 N 133 • DATE OF COUNT: 04/10/01 O $ I28 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 29 0 4 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 H 1-2010 4J I L. 1-1987 22 -I i L6 T= 2 .3% T= 2 .1% 2020—■ 4-1981 P=.948 P=.911 0 i 0 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • r T=%'TRUCKS BY APPROACH 'l 1-1' P=PHF BY APPROACH 2042—► 2024—► DLAG 0 0 0 Peak Hour IO • 16:45-17:45 Traffic Smith i T= 0 P=O. � 0 TEV=4062 (503) 641-633 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • FROM - TO Iv —► J /] 1 L . 41 I r• r L ALL 16 :00-16 :05 1 138 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 1 291 16 :05-16 :10 0 140 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 1 278 16 :10-16 :15 1 143 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 193 1 341 16 :15-16 :20 1 119 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 1 320 16 :20-16 :25 0 146 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 173 3 326 16 :25-16 :30 0 168 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 324 16 :30-16 :35 0 151 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 184 0 343 16 :35-16 :40 0 158 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 324 16 :40-16 :45 0 155 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 327 16 :45-16 :50 0 170 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 1 331 16 :50-16 :55 0 153 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 1 323 16 :55-17:00 0 162 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 158 2 326 17:00-17:05 0 179 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 0 360 17:05-17:10 0 164 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 196 0 365 17:10-17 :15 0 170 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 172 0 350 17:15-17 :20 0 162 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 1 315 17:20-17 :25 0 160 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 326 17:25-17 :30 0 165 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 309 17:30-17 :35 0 180 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 149 1 336 17:35-17 :40 0 175 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 352 17:40-17 :45 0 180 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 369 17:45-17 :50 0 173 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 330 17:50-17 :55 0 170 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 0 309 17:55-18 :00 0 157 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 322 Total Survey 3 3838 39 58 0 5 0 0 1 0 3940 13 7897 PHF 0 .94 .79 .66 0 .5 0 0 0 0 . 91 .38 .944 % Trucks 0 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .1 0 2.2 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Hourly Totals 16:00-17:00 3 1803 19 29 0 2 0 0 1 0 1986 11 3854 16:15-17:15 1 1895 24 32 0 4 0 0 0 0 2055 8 4019 16:30-17:30 0 1949 22 31 0 4 0 0 0 0 1988 5 3999 16:45-17 :45 0 2020 22 29 0 4 0 0 0 0 1981 6 4062 17:00-18 :00 0 2035 20 29 0 3 0 0 0 0 1954 2 4043 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT PEAK HOUR REPORT HIGHWAY 99W AT HOMELIFE FURNITURE DRIVEWAY/FRONTAGE ROAD • T= 0% P=.75 N $133 • DATE OF COUNT: 04/10/01 O 128 DAY OF WEEK: Tue R 29 0 4 TIME STARTED: 16 :00 T TIME ENDED: 18 :00 H i-2010 *-I I Lo. *-1987 • + • 22 - L6 T= 2 .3% T= 2% 2020-► 4-1981 P=.948 P=.911 0 0 TEV=TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME • $ T=%TRUCKS BY APPROACH .1 r• P=PHF BY APPROACH 2042-► 2024-■ DLAG 0 0 0 Peak Hour I0 • 16 :45-17:45 Traffic Smithy TE i T= 0% P=0. � 0 V=4062 (503) 641-6333 EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND TIME PERIOD • • • FROM - TO _1, 4J I Lo, 4 I r► r L ALL ALL VEHICLES 16 :45-17 :00 0 485 6 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 477 4 980 17:00-17:15 0 513 6 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 545 0 1075 17:15-17 :30 0 487 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 448 1 950 17:30-17 :45 0 535 3 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 511 1 1057 LIGHT TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT 2 AXLES) 16 :45-17:00 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 14 17:00-17:15 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 20 17:15-17:30 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 17 17:30-17:45 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 18 MEDIUM TRUCKS (SINGLE UNIT > 2 AXLES) 16:45-17:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30-17:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HEAVY TRUCKS (SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER) 16 :45-17:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17:00-17:15 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 17:15-17:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 17:30-17:45 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 BICYCLES 16 :45-17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00-17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15-17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30-17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIANS CROSSWALK USEAGE ALL SOUTH WEST EAST NORTH 16:45-17:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00-17 :15 1 0 0 1 2 17:15-17 :30 0 0 0 0 0 17:30-17:45 0 0 0 2 2 Peak Hour by Movement PHF 0 .94 .79 .81 0 .5 0 0 0 0 .91 .38 .944 % Trucks (all) 0 2 .3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 .1 % Trucks (M+H) 0 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2 0 .4 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 16 :00-17:00 3 1803 19 29 0 2 0 0 1 0 1986 11 3854 16 :15-17:15 1 1895 24 32 0 4 0 0 0 0 2055 8 4019 16 :30-17:30 0 1949 22 31 0 4 0 0 0 0 1988 5 3999 16 :45-17 :45 0 2020 22 29 0 4 0 0 0 0 1981 6 4062 17:00-18 :00 0 2035 20 29 0 3 0 0 0 0 1954 2 4043 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection HWY 99W/FRONTAGE RD Agency/Co. LANCASTER Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year EXISTING CONDITIONS Analysis Time Period AM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street: HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 14 2044 1 0 1194 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2174 1 0 1270 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR U.stream Si.nal I 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 1 0 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 I 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Chan_nelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service , `� Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 14 0 0 1 19 C (m) (vph) 639 433 0 223 698 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.08 Control Delay 10.8 13.3 21.2 10.3 LOS B B F C B Approach Delay -- -- 10.8 Approach LOS -- -- B TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection 99W/FRONTAGE RD Agency/Co. LANCASTER Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year EXISTING CONDITIONS Analysis Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street: HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 2020 0 0 1981 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 2148 0 0 2107 _ 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 _ 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR J L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 4 0 29 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 0 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 , Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 �_ 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v(vph) 23 0 0 4 _ 30 C (m) (vph) 399 458 0 140 550 v/c 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.05 95% queue length 0.18 0.00 0.09 0.17 Control Delay 14.6 12.9 31.5 11.9 LOS B B F D B Approach Delay -- -- 14.2 Approach LOS -- -- B TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection HWY 99W/FRONTAGE RD Agency/Co. LANCASTER Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year 2002 BACKGROUND Analysis Time Period AM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street: HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 14 2105 1 0 1229 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 _ 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2239 1 0 1307 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 _ 1 I Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 1 0 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 14 0 0 1 19 C (m) (vph) 604 376 0 198 635 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.09 Control Delay 11.1 14.6 23.3 10.8 LOS B B F C B Approach Delay -- -- 11.5 Approach LOS -- -- B I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection 99W/FRONTAGE RD Agency/Co. LANCASTER Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year 2002 BACKGROUND Analysis Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street: HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 2081 0 0 2040 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 2213 0 0 2170 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized _ 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR _ L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 _ 0 4 0 29 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 0 _ 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 3 I 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N _ Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 _ 1 Configuration LTR LT R Deily,-Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v(vph) 23 0 0 _ 4 30 C (m) (vph) _ 354 398 0 118 556 v/c 0.06 _ 0.00 0.03 0.05 95% queue length 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.17 Control Delay 15.9 14.0 36.6 11.8 LOS C B F E B Approach Delay _ -- -- 14.8 Approach LOS -- -- B I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection HWY 99W/FRONTAGE Agency/Co. LANCASTER RD Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year 2002 BG+S1TE Analysis Time Period AM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street: HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 14 2086 49 54 1218 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 14 2219 52 57 1295 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 1 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume _ 35 0 55 1 0 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 0 58 1 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R O li `# ss Unglh "at iNeiiit:of eofl a.4. ... , . !: . ..__ . . Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 14 57 95 1 19 C (m) (vph) 566 351 219 120 489 v/c 0.02 0.16 0.43 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.08 0.57 2.03 0.03 0.12 Control Delay 11.5 17.2 33.5 35.3 12.7 LOS B C D E B Approach Delay -- -- 33.5 13.8 Approach LOS -- -- D B TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst TEM Intersection 99W/FRONTAGE RD Agency/Co. LANCASTER Jurisdiction ODOT Date Performed 4/17/01 Analysis Year 2002 BG+SITE Analysis Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Project ID CARBUCKS CARWASH East/West Street. HWY 99W North/South Street: FRONTAGE RD ACCESS Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 22 2066 44 58 2025 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 _ 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 2197 46 61 2154 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal 1 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 39 0 51 4 0 29 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 54 4 0 I 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 _ 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT I R e Y .Queue Length, enc1 Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LT R v (vph) 23 61 95 4 30 C (m) (vph) 361 373 209 74 560 v/c 0.06 0.16 0.45 0.05 0.05 95%queue length 0.20 0.58 2.17 0.17 0.17 Control Delay 15.6 16.5 35.8 56.4 11.8 LOS C C E F B Approach Delay -- -- 35.8 17.0 Approach LOS -- -- E C PP CITY OF TIGARD Community JeveCopment Shaping Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 12/19/2001 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001.00009 FILE TITLE: CARBUCKS CARWASH APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky OWNER: Hans H. & Marilyn K. Grunbaum, Trustees Majestic Homes, Inc. 21390 SW Edy Road PO Box 1046 Sherwood, OR 97140 Gresham, OR 97030 c/o William S. Wright & Associates PHONE: (503) 658-2767 809 N. Russell Street, Suite 201 Portland, OR 97227 (503) 335-3300 REQUEST: The project proponent is proposing to construct a 2,012 square foot fully automatic drive-thru carwash facility. The existing veterinary clinic building on the site will be demolished. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lot 2100. The project site is at the southeast corner of the 217 and Pacific Highway interchange due east of the northbound Pacific Highway off-ramp. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, CRITERIA: 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: AUGUST 23, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM I PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 4, 2001 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION Z VICINITY MAP Z LANDSCAPING PLAN Z IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN Z ARCHITECTURAL PLAN Z TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Z NARRATIVE ® GEOTECH REPORT Z OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 317 • • elloitlyik July 25, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Mike Nedelisky P.O. Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal-SDR2001-00009 CARBUCKS CARWASH Dear Mr. Nedelisky: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. The following clarifications and additional information are required before Staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1. Submit narrative addressing review criteria according to pre-application notes. An example narrative is attached. However, some of the criteria of the example may not apply to your project. Please review pre- application notes. 2. Submit a copy of the 500' Property Owner List generated by the City. 3. Submit 21 additional copies of narrative and plans. Once the required information has been submitted, Staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner is\cu rpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00009.acc.doc.dot c: SDR2001-00009 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 1 z�r Aug t � CITY OF TIGARD OREGON August 22, 2001 Mike Nedelisky P.O. Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal CARBUCKS CARWASH — SDR2001-00009 Dear Mr. Nedelisky: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete on 08/21/2001 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, Mat, ew Setreidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00009.accl.doc.dot c: SDR2001-00009 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES e�T n ' Eaon Community<Deveropment (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) SIwpingld'Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: co Z/ , - / STAFF AT PRE-APP.: /// • APPLICANT: "f(4,_ -!/ �sg/ AGENT: Phone: (5 '3) 6 5 - L71 7 Phone: ( ) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 7(7f z/ SCC) TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): /.:5/3 Lee- - pz/0C---) NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: ,���� , = �� a z-e." _Ytcr-i-r_ CAP.--r" c � COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: -��u-�".v �.0.-~e1 a ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.) AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. S' C' i MINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 5-6 ft. Max. building height: Setbacks: Front 0 ft. Side 0 ft. Rear ft. Corner C7 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 85'% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: / '/o. IBORNOOD MEETING •(Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans • Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. f]TY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 NON-Aesidential Application/Pinning Division Section r , 1,/I .14V0 4 ,4iic 'd ( Ocdcd4 "JiI 1G( ` NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390] The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. PACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. A74., -- ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765] •J Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: �� . Minimum pavement width: - All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: . `, WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030] WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (4-SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730] ➢ STREETS: 5-6) feet from the centerline of . ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the sites boundary. > FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.130.010.BJ BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: D A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (%2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ,k BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745] ✓✓✓✓"`"'" In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON-Resdenml Apphation/Planning Dnision Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ?;! LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chanters 18.745,18.165 and 18.105] STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chanter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. 24 PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040] REQUIRED parking for this type of use: .Q//,© J Ito /mss 7/.4.11, Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: 2-0-1-4-'2- % /°6'0-* fi(at-)C Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. ----117HANDICAPPED PARKING: .- All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. C1OADAREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 ING Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. - CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Dnrsion t i,on • CYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. 2 SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7751 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. 2 STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C) ° When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 31 LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: USA DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 10 to <50 acres 15 feet >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25% slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. PITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Doman Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the USA Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. USA Se_rvice Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a USA Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, USA must still issue a letter stating a USA Service Provider Letter is not required. —SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. i r4 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.190.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.190.060.EJ REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON.Aesidentul Application/Plow:Dnisioa Section If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. CLEAR VISION AREA [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7951 The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.791.0301 The WATER RESOURCES WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Is in ended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corrid rs; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant c ver; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conse e scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These pro sions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The ualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 100 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annu I flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Major streams in T and include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER RIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISHRING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard inCtude Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FRO AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE F AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the " arian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SE BACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 0 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential AppI Lion/Planning Division Section ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) standards adoped and administered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.191.100] The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE/A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN : : - • ' DUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was sub .- ]ally disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of the following: I D Native plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; D The tree canopy currently covers less tha 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-sl fan setback area for the last five years; D That vegetation was not removed contrary to the prOVIsiens of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; D That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and D The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. ''AD//''DITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/4 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 1 8.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 18.765(off-Street Parking/loading Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) --- 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 1 8.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(Signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Vanances/Adjustments) 18.115(Density Computations) '� 18.790(Tree Removal) 1 8.380(toning Map/Text Amendments) 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 1 8.195(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) .<1..._18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) 1 8.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) _- 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 1 8.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.410(lot Line Adjustments) _ 18.740(Histonc Overlay) - 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 1 8.420(land Partitions) 1 8.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) °4 18.745(Landscaping 8 Screening Standards) (,r 18.510(Residential Toning Distracts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 1( 18.520(Commercial Toning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(lndustnal Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Resdental Apphauon/Planning Division Section • ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: f■ ce't 11, «—,. 74c, . e7.. - • / /F�'• 7471S, 44- c_9...es (57.—7K-') PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Appliuuon/Pinning Dnis on ktlion • The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal pej,iod follows all a se decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is availifble from t e Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a .prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). .�� PREPARED BY: / /1._ isy CITY 0 TIGARD 'LANNIN ' VI I TAF- -RE : � G PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-1297 E-MAIL: (staff's first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:\pattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: I8-Jan-2001 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 el 9 NONlesidentiil Appliution/Plinnmg Division Section • CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: % ..//.<� . . ;�_ Date: ,,-,'z 57 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map 4,er-- Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map ,JEr___ Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map _.-Ec Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Site Development Plan Architectural Drawings (. 1Z_ Landscape Plan `I Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES �i COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations cf cv?^fino structures and their uses ❑ Locatu• :: '3= City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) L Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements n • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas • The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots Lf If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials (� Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ • Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6"or greater caliper at 4'above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways (l • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ • Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ ♦ Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: ♦ All areas to be landscaped ❑ • Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed n Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location,width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) ❑ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE A,#;.,�:, REQUEST ;.� 9 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION ` 'Al • ; Applicant: KA i Kra (\(� r lit S 14--J Address: P.O. p Dot(v Phone:__3 (5 s-2-74= Case No.: Receipt�No.: City: �`/R � �f Zip. Application —lication Accepted By: — — Contact Person: tK - n/-- -hone: Date: _-__.__ Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): DATE OF PRE-APP.: TIME OF PRE-APP.: 7i i 0 S ( Phone: PRE-APP.HELD WITH; Address: City: --t�q�� D _ Zip . q /`/O Rev.12/6/2000 Ocurpin\n35terVevis6dlPre-A p P.Re9 ueet.doc S � I,' ` Property Address/Location(s): / �� - R � I_ED :MI � L CEMENTS P/ tit 1'� (� ��� �� � 0�Z� (Note: applications will nos be accepted without the required submittal elements) ° lS Z -- o► w S ' 36 Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): _ / Pre Application Conf. Request Form P' jZtD?i'� I )t�s r �, �f7I � ' 31� oP A •FTH o LO IN Site Size: ` ( p �.-�E. 1 L 2Q00 1] Brief Description of the Proposal and --L. any site-specific questions/issues that PRE-APP I ATI•N •NF REN INF•RMATI•N 2-(00 p you tootld meet to have staff research [] Site Plan. The site plan must show the All i the information identified on this form the Planning l Division ba proposed lots site plan building layouts submitted by the applicant and received by en- 1 --k .ri•r . .ffi i.II h-• line drawn to scale. Also, show the location minim of the subject property in relation to the .r--...li -ti.n .nf-r-n - .at-/tim- to allow staff ample time to nearest streets; and the locations of prepare for the meeting. driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either The Proposed Uses. T - .- •r Th r .. m•rnin• . Pre-application conferences are Topographic Information. Include on (11 ho r I n and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Contour Lines if Possible. 00-11'00 AM. 011 If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN project, the applicant must N P of the letter and proof in PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM the form of an affidavit of and mailing,roof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the collocation protocol was completed (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE Community Development of the PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE OM INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE MADE SO TO THAT ACCOMMODATE OTHE h Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN B '.x1/1110 - Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) February 2001 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thursday., February 15, 2001 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app Mike Nedelisky 503.658.2767 SDR- 11481 Hall Blvd. 9:30 10:00 Pre-App Mike Nedeliksy 503-658.2767 Car ash-11744 S.W. Pac, Hwy. 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 10:49AM Thursday, February 08, 2001 January 26, 2001 City Of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Or 97223 Re: Commercial Development proposal APPLICANT: Mike Nedelisky PO Box 1046 Gresham, Or 97030 Ph: 503-658-2767 Fax: 503-658-5416 OWNER: Hans Grunbaum 21390 SW Edy Rd Sherwood, OR 97140 PROPERTY: ADDRESS: 11744 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223. LEGAL DESCR: TL 2000 & 2100 (see attached legal) SIZE: .46 ACRE 20,038 Square Feet NARRATIVE: The applicant, Mike Nedelisky is proposing to use the existing Vet building for a drive through Car Wash on the proposed Entrance to the proposed ' would be off of Pacific Hwy at Dartmouth as per the attached site plan. The site is sloping and has one existing 25' x 55' structure on it. The car wash would be attached to the existing structure and be on the property line of the property per the City Tigard code. The applicant has formally submitted a site plan for ODOT's review. They have replied verbally with the request that the applicant submit this application through their permitting process. Respectfully submitted, Michael J. Nedelisky : . , " . e Srif._ FANS PAC• f"► ,i, V , 1.---= 4 ' C �sJ..E 4,, ., ,hi ..--c.4% . , ..• /T ■ �`j‘ - - ' — ---0-. t4 t r ....100 o, g REV I pnr�`� \ IAA" t'i 4-• 1- • rrJL7 `gyp — �-�'�.�� / i\f T. wore \i't`tit/4 - VI oi4 ,: ' 4 DSO " ', , ''. 11 7 Z), 92 ,-,.-\ \lifie 1 Cr --, i)o-AfrzsrotoR H744 . w Paci�c i.tw.y • �°off / Co 'rGo SrrF �t-r i or `i i;/�s) i 8 --- '011'10/2001 WSWREALESTATE ifli2001 04:50 503335715 --• . S - --- ®003 89/13/90 X0N 17:30 FAS 1 503 :74 6472 CCSTOYER SERVICE Y ,� Fidelity stational 'title Company of Oregon g._.n ' Map # 1S136CC 02100 lill ��O 7,, mo'vtt.is►krto. M."ik"WI u Mad.1.1∎6111 br Ills*,n•&maQ"'a"and lx.tioa,wor+ r e47 adlodl /4 NW Coa �.oYt I 'PO 41 TWIN WO I.ANg I , � O. o Or , 2100 iQ` / N MAC ��4 6 000 a. 10 i m al N CA �. fir t , --- . )r r • IP r a W 1 Y 1 Y g D l x t- 4 W 6>y jit#q I FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY . . 00 NOT RELY ON FOR ANY USE . . . gvA t rLL£0� 70SSd 1HJIam NM µd A*zze °H1 66� 9t-d35 ' - .k' .. ■... . .., . .... . • ,. \S„ . -_ f. r• .. , ii r \ ,, --- 1 7--, i ..) ."-- ,..-- - ---TaWrailiRtage . .. --- -,..--,,---•-■■••••• 41.....-- ........ -7:-7 '"/an' ''''..%_.\7....----0: - . .. , . ',7,..„....■77-- --. 14■1111****ARS*1411-.."fc..,-,,,. •••••••• cc. ... • ' ''.--•***... .... .......z. "'"*"' -vb.421.4..._,- ,noc*,..11f-c. ,c,"**--;-.., ",.. **, - —.-------TI \ f .`' ,-c;.4,••4',=----_!E..7 . .C.,- ; . ._ ..,•4...131•Lfai..,1-...2: ., ,_±.... --Ita.•••-.."--.!. V ... - 1 ,27-.1.` - . -; ---., :-,-,'"-=',""---. -.-1.-,' -'" " - -. -,."'l‘ ..!,t,- -,.....,........,,,- -=' ' pc..*,,f- ' *••••,--.T.-, •- ..7. 11: .c.....01 - . • f-,,-- ' ,c-.....-... --------•--- - f 1 -- " -- -...7----.7 ' -.L---------_. - - - — VMS CAM- va013________________._=__________-----_ -- • - an-r-lim's • _.. . i . ■cir6-4 --c i "t se 14':•". * c", *1--1."•.* ' • • i - •- ''w.C."14::q . • *. 9 I" . . . * 11 11111 Int 111., I •9 •c, ...... „ 101 IMO' . ' .i=••••••••••r---Z. I I 21„ 6 I I Ill I Pr 4 ' MI V .. .-■ ' --.=. ....4o.14,•;•:',.!,citi..1P41'. ----—-- ---..-r-.------.- - - ' - ; ■ ' - "".-i.--A-r'ele •''-i II.Y-1 • e- ..... .--4.-•-*•- , '',- ' r-C....14A A.••••■•• I :'. 4...i. 4;7'. .•....'. ----"--161;U";.-- '--.1,.'.h-. ,-- ----c-----..—":"A-1-.--''..-1-:.....—.1----tar---........ ..---..: .....7--, .....„ . .., ...i. .4 . '.--r---------'-'2"-----.- .---. 4--,.- rn-171 1"r- • • co IIM • —,L-I.-.......-....)----.....-.--!. .1 -• •, ; . .- . . -. 01ISSMILINII 91 .... • • • . . • • -. . . , CI I Y o1 I IGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 4411/4\ VICINITY MAP 11744 SW Pac Hwy. 10 ... ..-- ....m..rik A,G011b11run..(,0 foot, Vv 7--- ,.„.– N ei 0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet 1"=172 feet City of Tigard Information on this map is for general location only and should be venfied with the Development Services Division. — _ 13125 SW Hall Blvd • ---� ---__ Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 • , http Overm ci Tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Feb 8,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS • CARBUCKS CAR WASH • April 30,2003 Matthew Scheideggar • Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Tigard, OR 97223 • Re: Extension request for Carbucks Car Wash-Pacific Hwy • To Whom It May Concern: . Carbucks Car Wash is requesting an extension to the above mentioned development for one additional year No changes are being made to the approved original site development plan This development will require demo of the existing building within • this extension period. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance.provisions on which the approval was based. • es it fl, y submitted; •. I\ED Mike Nedelisky • Carbucks1 .2001 •PLAN t4Gliskzr MG • • • • G fi • APR. • ) 2.003 , CtE rvr-.1 i4ARD PL'ANNINGIENGINEERING po box 1046 aresbam.or 97080 ah:503-658-2767 : • • ♦ti24 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON May 12, 2003 Majestic Development Attn: Mike Nedelisky P.O. Box 1046 Gresham, OR 97030 RE: SDR2001-00009 Carbucks Approval Extension Dear. Mr. Nedelisky: This letter is in response to your request for an extension to the approval period for the Carbucks Carwash. Based on the information submitted on April 30, 2003, Staff has determined that the criteria for approval of an extension have been met. The first 18 months of the Site Development Review would have expired on May 2, 2003. The new expiration date will be May 2, 2004. Substantial construction of the site must begin within the time frame indicated above or the approval will expire. The code does not permit any further extensions. Please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x2437 if you have any questions on this request. Sincerely, • Mathew Scheidegger/J Assistant Planner i:curpin/mathew/SDR2001-00009.extension.doc c: SDR2001-00009 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772