The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2001-00008 SDR2001 - 00008 HALL DAYCARE FACILITY NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION A .I�1► SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 ,E :�, CITY OF TIGARD HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/31/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. APPLICANT: George and Pamela Wall OWNER: Same 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 1 OF 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1. Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. 2. Provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. 3. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. 4. Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. 5. Provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line, and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. 6. Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. 7. Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (Section 18.755.050.C). 8. Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. 9. Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 10. Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. 11. Provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover a possible connection to the sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard. If no new lateral is required, then no permit is needed. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 2 OF 22 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform the half-street improvement in SW Hall Boulevard. The improvement shall be constructed to the ODOT interim standard, with a pavement width of 25 feet from centerline to curb. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide, to meet City standards. A copy of the ODOT permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Deparent (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,640.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 19. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility (paver system) for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 3 OF 22 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found a Zone Change and Annexation for the .42 acre parcel to be annexed into the City of Tigard. No other land- use cases are associated with this parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered on the east and south sides by property zoned (R-5) Residential. Property to the north is zoned (C-P) Professional Commercial and property to the west is separated from the subject site by SW Hall Boulevard. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One letter was sent to Staff from Terry Wolff. The letter listed the following concerns: • 36-inch Oak tree at the rear of the lot. • How will the rear of the lot be retained. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant has not decided whether or not the 36-inch Oak tree will remain. However, no Arborist report or protection plan has been submitted. Therefore, the applicant has been conditioned in the decision to provide an Arborist report and protection plan for all trees over 12-inches in diameter. According to the proposed site plan and the applicant's narrative, the eastern property line will be retained by a masonry retaining wall. However, the applicant has not indicated how tall the wall will be. Therefore, the applicant has been conditioned in the decision to provide information regarding the height of the wall. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 4 OF 22 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-P: Professional Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft 18,265 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 96 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 89 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[3] - -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 24.5 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Maximum Height 45 ft 22 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 69% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-P zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Hall Boulevard, which is a public street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 5 OF 22 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has indicated that ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation) requires a joint access easement for the subject property and the property to the south. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Hall Boulevard, a public street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, includin the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six Teet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same-lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete and is approximately 5 feet from the southern property line. The width of the driveway approach is 24 feet and is roughly 145 feet from the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street right-of-way line. Therefore, this standard has been met. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance on the west facade to the west property line and connects to SW Hall Boulevard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 6 OF 22 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or arking lots such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does cross the proposed parking lot associated with this project. The portion of the walkway that crosses the parking lot is approximately 25 feet. However, the applicant has not shown the walkway to have pavement markings. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access from SW Hall Boulevard into the parking lot that is 24 feet wide. Therefore, this standard has been met. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The site plan shows the access drives to accommodate for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 7 OF 22 To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The subject property is surrounded by residentially zoned property on all sides but the north side, which is also, zoned C-P. According to the site plan, the parking area abuts the northern property line, thus increasing the possibility to connect to the adjoining property in the future. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed site has approximately 95 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. According to the criterion above, street trees are only required for developments fronting on a public or private street more than 100 feet in length. Therefore, this standard does not apply. However, staff encourages the applicant to plant street trees to increase the aesthetic value of the area. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Property to the north is zoned (C-P) Professional Commercial. Property to the east and south of the subject site is zoned (R-5) Medium Density Residential, and property to the west is zoned (C-G) General Commercial. According to the buffering matrix (Table 18.745.1) the site is required to provide buffering according to the "D" buffering standard. The site plan shows the site providing between 21 and 29 feet of buffering, which consists of a 6-foot fence on top of a proposed retaining wall, Rhododendrons, Birch trees and lawn. However, the applicant has not indicated the what kind of fence is being used. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 8 OF 22 The proposed parking area associated with this project is visible from SW Hall Boulevard and adjoining properties to the north and south. The site plan shows the parking area to be screened to the south with a retaining wall, one Birch tree and 3-rhododendrons. The proposed parking lot is screened from the western property line abutting SW Hall Boulevard by lawn only. The northern property line will be screened with 8-rhododendrons and a birch tree. However, staff cannot determine what kind of ground cover is proposed on the northern property line. The parking lot will be developed with 13 parking stalls, requiring one landscaped island with 4-rhododendrons and one Birch tree. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line and the western property line to be landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: • Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. • Provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line, and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (11 of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off-from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the 4 methods are used to demonstrate compliance and no sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility has been provided. Therefore, the applicant must provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 9 OF 22 located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The site plan shows the trash enclosure to be located near the southern property line within the side yard. The placement of the enclosure is near the front of the proposed building, which enhances its accessibility, and it will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not addressed what material the trash enclosure will be constructed out of, its height or its gate openings. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (18.755.050.C). FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITIONS: Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. • Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (18.755.050.C). Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the proposed building, is 74 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 10 OF 22 Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will have a total of 13 parking stalls. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site plan shows the site will have a total of 13 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan provides for 1 ADA accessible parking stall located in the newly configured parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 11 OF 22 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly.and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). However, plans show no structures within the visual clearance triangle. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . The plans submitted show the parking spaces, and both access isles will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not addressed wheel stops in the narrative or on the site plan. According to the standard above, all parking stalls along the boundaries of the project and adjacent to the interior walkway are required to be provided with wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls (7.5 x 18.5). Aisle widths meet the minimum standard of 24 feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 12 OF 22 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Daycare is 1.5 spaces per classroom. The proposed building will have a total of 6 classrooms and will be required to provide a 9-stall bicycle rack. The narrative indicates bicycle parking will be provided on the south side of the proposed building. However, the site plan does not indicate how many stalls are to be provided. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle arking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parkin facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Daycare is 1.5 spaces per classroom. Therefore, based on a 6-classroom daycare, the site is required to provide a 9-stall bicycle rack. The applicant has been conditioned earlier to provide evidence of a 9-stall bicycle rack. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Commercial Daycare Use is 2.0 spaces per classroom and the maximum is 3.2 spaces per classroom. Based on a 6-classroom daycare, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 19 parking spaces. The plans provide 13 parking spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 13 OF 22 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed daycare is approximately 5,035 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. • Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zoning District. The site plan shows an interior illuminated monument sign near the entrance to the site. However, the applicant has not addressed the sign criteria under 18.780.130.D (Signs in the C-P Zone). Therefore, the applicant will be required to apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because the applicant has indicated an interior illuminated monument sign near the entrance of the site and has not addressed the sign criteria, this standard has not been satisfied. Therefore, the applicant will be required to comply with the following condition: CONDTION: Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has indicated that a 34-inch Oak tree exists onsite. However, the applicant has not shown the tree on the site plan. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been met. CONDITION:Provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 14 OF 22 Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street ri9ht- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions are shown or have been proposed within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. According to City overlay maps, the subject site is shown as class #1 soil type, which is considered a Aloha soil/silt loam. The USGS Conservation District considers the soil to be somewhat of a poorly drained soil. However, the subject site's topography is substantially level, thus decreasing the chance of sliding and drainage of the site is defined in detail under section 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The proposed building is surrounded by lawn and landscaping, which is adequate for light and air circulation. The Building Division has made fire-fighting considerations later in this decision. The proposed alterations to the site will not change the existing grade significantly enough to disturb the natural or physical environment. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 15 OF 22 • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located around the entire building. The site plan shows a parking lot light at the entrance of the site. Trash enclosures and bicycle parking areas are located toward the front of the building. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on a section of SW Hall Boulevard. This section of Hall Boulevard is not part of a Tri-met transit route. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-P) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a five-lane paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to ODOT to provide a total of 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's materials indicate they will provide this dedication. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 16 OF 22 SW Hall Boulevard is currently paved, but not improved to full standard. As an interim improvement, ODOT has been requiring developers to construct SW Hall Boulevard to a S- lane standard, with the pavement width at 25 feet from centerline to curb. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement to the ODOT interim standard. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement. A permit from ODOT will be required prior to construction. Access: The applicant's proposed new driveway apron to SW Hall Boulevard has been approved by ODOT, and the location as shown on the plan is acceptable to the City. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvement on SW Hall Boulevard, this standard will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard that has sufficient capacity to serve this site The applicant's plan indicates they plan to make use of an existing lateral. However, City as-built information indicates the existing lateral is closer to the north property line of this site, versus the location shown on the applicant's plans. The applicant will need to resolve this issue prior to construction. If a new lateral is required, then a permit from the City will be required for the new sewer tap. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site slopes to the west toward SW Hall Boulevard. The established residential properties to the east are higher in elevation than this site. The proposed area drains, to be located on the east and south sides of the new building, will accommodate any surface flows affecting this site. These area drains will then flow into the onsite storm drainage system. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 17 OF 22 Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide detention in an onsite detention pipe under the parking lot. The sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer are acceptable. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 18 OF 22 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 96 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,640.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The plans show that the applicant intends to adjust the existing meter for the site to serve the new building. Any approvals needed from TVWD shall be acquired prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to incorporate a paver system for the parking lot that will have a gravel filter below it. The gravel filter and soil infiltration will provide the necessary treatment levels required by CWS. The applicant's calculations have already been reviewed and approved by CWS. Staff also supports the proposal. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 19 OF 22 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00, because the address for the existing duplex unit will be retired once the structure is demolished. A new address number will be assigned to the new daycare facility. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $21,592 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $67,475 ($21,592 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $45,883. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements along SW PfafFle Street since this is the frontage they are obtaining access from. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $55,440 (2,400 square feet x $12.00 per square foot, $28,800 + 96 feet x $250 per linear foot for street improvements, + 96 feet x $27.50 for underground utilities), Therefore, the required improvements are roughly proportional. At any rate, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 20 OF 22 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • The applicant must follow all provisions described in Section 18.790.30.1 (Tree Removal). The City of Tigard Advanced Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Access, Hydrant and hydrant location approved by TVFR. • If the site includes fencing it must comply with OSSC. Section 1007.3.11. The site as drawn may have a problem with compliance with this section. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the minimum fire flow is available in the area. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. (UFC 903.4) 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, go to www.tvfr.com, choose "Fire Prevention", then choose "New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 21 OF 22 SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 17, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type Ill Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 31, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �. � � ® � ' - e August 17, 2001 PREPAR BY Q hew Scheid -.ger DATE Assistant Planner ,/ e-z_. IPA' August 17, 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be ersdorff DATE Planning M. ager :\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00008.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 22 OF 22 - -- I lit CITY of TIGARD- - 111 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1 ST r \� < a — VICINITY MAP _ LOCUST CI I _ =w — =� SDR2001 -00008 ) (MAPLELEAF ST Q � _IIIIIIII � _ - MAPLELEAF ST HALL DAYCARE _r_____›V _ 0:, — FACILITY CO - SITE /Z- ST ' OAK _ I I J OAK / , ��, PINE ST _PINE _ $T • ,.4____ 1 I ._ . J , SP-UCE ST ST 1 L11 111111111111111 ----._ ,.. 911 ---firawarm• • s 1 THQR MN S a,.,` is N = 1 r s 0 200 400 900 Feet co �,,',� 1"-404 feet Al ', \ S-1 E ... Ihis:_ki,), yo Ii City of Tigard 1,.> Iould 5.verified on this h IT Is for general location only and - +. MI should De verged with the Develop=Services Division. 13125 SW Nall Blvd Tigard,503)OR 97223 `_, (503)939-4171 0 a a_ http:/Mw.v.d.tlgard.or.us '^ Plot date:Jul 9,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development I i 11 I I PA61RY . I I tam LOT 2 LOT 1 I ' 1.- h I I MOO I 45.5.5 raN a 141.31 t ,0452' '7.00 - '..I �r roast' cmrtAnon; r —––—––— I[1 1, .:4' y 1 .Y d `Ofuo E10$IT'c ..', I •.1•• . .i I DUPILA SmRUCTNrt Y :1 ru4Mlr ,.II Y .�.;.•':,F`..+.•ti, •T ;,.•n.�.:. :: .. I:' :I•s, g R• 1 p •••. L. ,t so I - " ... :13 V4 PROPOSED BUILDING 'a li C� rR .545450 '45•.50 5,029 S.F. i I I I / (P t "n.I! I I / I a N F:.. I ;qtrI j „ :&73 P4rclwr M L : '•-�. /. oot I -_—.I.__— I1tM 9R OAT .., / S • AICAINLRr PON ,; / I $ ' OAR a 1 P CKtt RACK tr.' f PLAY AMA 41. 8 .� ------- --- M+o CASING*AL: l ''n.u'.rsna OLDICI nos) `KA 0'MACE CM TOP a I cw RC r,wwQ 1.ut I CNSlNc PtNCCNn.,Ca CWAr LOT 5 LOT 6 ILAa1MV Rts¢run.0 I CITY OF TIGARD t SDR2001-00008 CITY Of TIGARD SITE PLAN N HALL DAYCARE FACILITY (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 CITY,FAitql Community Development HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/31/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. APPLICANT: George and Pamela Wall OWNER: Same 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25G) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Not ci mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 17, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A.i ± The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 31, 2001. I uestions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. riI I GITYa1TIGARD 8T -1 H VICINITY MAP ■ — cT °T MUM ■ „1 SDR2001-00008 i �� ■1111 . ■IIG11 v� �iiUi ■ ■ �� HALL DAYCARE ' I1■ .11111■ � � — FACILITY IBi "'■ ■1t■11�11 ,7 i11 110 ppr- 111111..• - V1111 aim: Elms PINE 5 l� I �p14! 4 III r!.I. ■ 1111 - ow. -Nigh hi;Nimilim,,011111111 • NI gnaw NA 1 Illimm.. == T.I. cryorrs,.d MlI1Y.„ Nam /NMI WNW NIII= 7 MAW 1111= c)1.1 I I I 1 l i I _ i LOT 1 l LOT 1 i I T IM •O tI ..■--■ ; I I ..� '� lr N. I ! 40M V. II 1 Ili l l' :v l r-..r ..v.w Ii--.--, LOT 6 LOT 6 I I I I.mr- CITY OF TIGARD T sDR2001.0000e srTE PLAN N HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Map Is not to scale) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI JER,VENDOR OR SELLER: 0 THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY u� 'I OF TIGARD Community(Development SlziapingA Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 9, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g. convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 23, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew S cheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 9, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ♦ Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to addresne relevant approval criteria with _ dcient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." HI I I -_ f i - ....I,T. .of. TIGARD \ . ST .-F a — VICINITY MAP r ■�min' LOCUST M. MAPLELEAF ST �� _< � - - H SDR200I-00008 MirirAllok 111,11111 L I S HALL DAYCARE Ailiii E FACILITY - SITE �jj „1,, VIII! ST 7 / _ 1 F I T ! IiiiI PINE S mom ,.00,, 1 ___. --------------------gi_i_J11— VA= 1 , I T L ii SPRJCE ST WRAP • T I T 111111111--- 11— 0 300 400 !00 fM ... 1•a.MI �. �— ST ` / ilk is,,..,i, Ciry of Tigard REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: August 13, 2001 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer -" RE: SDR 2001-00008, Hall Daycare Facility Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a five-lane paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to ODOT to provide a total of 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's materials indicate they will provide this dedication. SW Hall Boulevard is currently paved, but not improved to full standard. As an interim improvement, ODOT has been requiring developers to construct SW Hall Boulevard to a 3-lane standard, with the pavement width at 25 feet from centerline to curb. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 1 applicant should construct a half-street improvement to the ODOT interim standard. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement. A permit from ODOT will be required prior to construction. Access The applicant's proposed new driveway apron to SW Hall Boulevard has been approved by ODOT, and the location as shown on the plan is acceptable to the City. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvement on SW Hall Boulevard, this standard will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard that has sufficient capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates they plan to make use of an existing lateral. However, City as-built information indicates the existing lateral is closer to the north property line of this site, versus the location shown on the applicant's plans. The applicant will need to resolve this issue prior to construction. If a new lateral is required, then a permit from the City will be required for the new sewer tap. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 2 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site slopes to the west toward SW Hall Boulevard. The established residential properties to the east are higher in elevation than this site. The proposed area drains, to be located on the east and south sides of the new building, will accommodate any surface flows affecting this site. These area drains will then flow into the onsite storm drainage system. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide detention in an onsite detention pipe under the parking lot. The sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer are acceptable. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 3 Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 4 placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 96 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 2,640.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The plans show that the applicant intends to adjust the existing meter for the site to serve the new building. Any approvals needed from TVWD shall be acquired prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to incorporate a paver system for the parking lot that will have a gravel filter below it. The gravel filter and soil infiltration will provide the necessary treatment levels required by CWS. The applicant's calculations have already been reviewed and approved by CWS. Staff also supports the proposal. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 5 with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00, because the address for the existing duplex unit will be retired once the structure is demolished. A new address number will be assigned to the new daycare facility. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 6 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover a possible connection to the sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard. If no new lateral is required, then no permit is needed. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right-of- way of SW Hall Boulevard. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 7 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,640.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility (paver system) for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. \eng\brianr\com ments\sdr\sdr2001-00008.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00008 Hall Daycare Facility PAGE 8 SpLabo/-WOO RECEIVED PLANNING JUL 1 8 2001 CITY OF T!GARD July 16, 2001 City of Tigard Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner/Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard OR 97223 Ref: Tax Lot 2800, WCTM 1 S 135AA Dear Mathew Scheidegger; I leave next door to the lot in question, mine and the neighbors concerns are what will be done with the big oak tree at back of the lot. Will it be cut down or remain there for another 100 years? I would also like to know how the back wall will be retained in and preventing the hillside's integrity from sliding down. I'm sure there are laws and regulations on how far you have to come from property line for high from ground that will have to be followed. I'm so glad that something is finally being done to the ugliest lot in a county. Please keep me informed on what will happen to our concerns. Sincerely ��G i Wit .� 105(15 Sw S5'�' Ave. Terry Wolff Oc*L4vi t OR. 91. -1 �.)oC) ► —OCICV T MEMORANDUM ANNA 11111111111 TO: Matt Scheidegger _• .. FROM: Matt Stine RE: Hall Daycare Facility DATE: July 17, 2001 18.790.30.1 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel, or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. The applicant must follow all provisions described in 18.790.30. 1. The applicant must follow the above guidelines since it is stated in the narrative that an existing 34-inch oak will be retainedand protected onsite. Additionally, it appears from the enclosed aerial photo that more trees exist on the southern boundary of the property. A full arborist report is required. JUL-19 01 20:00 FROM:WASHCO LAND DEV SERV 503-846-2908 TO'rq36847297 PAGE:02 02 41111% WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Department of Land Use and Transportation,Land Development Services U. 155 North First Avenue, Suite 350-13,Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 (503)845-8761 -FAX;(503)846-2908 Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner July 19, 2001 City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FAX: 684-7297 # of Pages: 1 RE: Hall Daycare Facility City File Number: SDR 2001-00008 Location: 10530 SW Hall Blvd. Tax Map and Lot Number: 1S1 35AA /2800 '' L.. fiXr — N401;IMIIIII1 . I IIV MN I . IIiT4j' Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has received materials regarding the above noted development application but will not be submitting any requirements/conditions. The project site is not immediately adjacent to County maintained road sections nor is it part of a phased development that has previously been determined to significantly impact a County roadway. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-846-8131. .7 ,3 -,7 f _ ( - ' 'Anne LaMounta in Associate Planner F:1 Shared\LDS1 WPSHARE1TRANSPITIG1HaIIDaycareNOCOMM.doc • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS '�ARD Community cDeve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 9,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager JUL 2 3 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: (5031 639-4111/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISM 2001-00008 HALL DAYCARE FACILITY REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 23, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — ak 3 att scr ,,k 4144,6," 7-1110 152A-Ve‘k, • 1. �r,-1 7//f/e/ "PA.01,0te-- W h4/(771 ri f/e Ofease provide thefortowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C, na,,Ro Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 9,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official JUL 1 0 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2001-00008 y HALL DAYCARE FACILITY REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 23, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: t\I. ke.42ullata. Jeke646. 4 '` a•Jo Jai - L e.460,4 plc. or -T144 S cria- 114 CA A4 D E S F491AJ CI NCs1 I T 01444 r C.4;1,1,(1 t.<J l w EKE,, ca 't' I e 97. 3. it • gt5 s i i- A-S 7)24(.0..1 4147 Witt/0 10440, 49vn t.U'rt4- r>V&A-kir-4 Iv! T W-ts sese4texi1 (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: 4,4 I Phone Number(s): 39z I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: July 9,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer JUL 1 2 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY CF riGgRp STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: 15031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2001-00008 HALL DAYCARE FACILITY REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 23, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: A i a\ U I Phone Number(s): Ao REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CINOFTI1, Community Devedopment Shaping Better Community DATE: July 9,2001 . VED PLANNING TO: Long Range Planning Staff: Duane l lull �N� Jo FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division JUL 0 9 2001 CITY OF r STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: (503)6844297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2001-00008 HALL DAYCARE FACILITY REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 23, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — (Crease provide the foaming information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping/4 Better Community DATE: July 9,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDRI 2001-00008 HALL DAYCARE FACILITY �( REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JULY 23, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P1iase provide the foffowing infon ation)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): I CITY ' TIGARD REQUEST FOR COI110ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: _�_-) �G`r' - c`C,C % S. FILE NAME: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central ❑East ❑South ❑West OProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Supervisor COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. OLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official ,. ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Enginee WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder _PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy.Property Manager UBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester PLANNER-TIME TO POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM! /� / SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.I.IX TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE • _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ UNIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY • Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON * _ CITY OF TUALATIN * OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Carol Hall,Data Resource Center(ZCA) _ m .& US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,GwthManagementCoordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA/ZOA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY * Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D. Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR. DEPT.OF ENERGY IPowertines in Area) OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGAiuRa) CITY OF PORTLAND (notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy(IGA/URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator Tom. Ki -of-Way Section(vacations) X Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer tce zcoiuS14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 Portland,OR 97204 Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON 121-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (it Project is WOW G Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _ QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 TCI CABLE(Apps.E.of Halurr of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS (Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h tpattyvnasters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 6-May-01) MAILING RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No.Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 11,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on Augus111,2001, postage prepaid. (Person that Prep. ed N. ice) STATE of oEGoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ,-7,2 day of 1 h , 2001. OFFICIAL SEAL ►-: DIANE M JELDERKS ' ;• ' NOTARY PUBLC-0REGON MY OMM�SS ON EXPIRES SE5PT80T,2003 ( • ' I t ' t I I'' ;TI ' r My Commission Exp- 5: 6 Ez' " A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 :.t'' CITY OF TIGARD HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Community Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/31/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. APPLICANT: George and Pamela Wall OWNER: Same 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 1 OF 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1 . Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. 2. Provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. 3. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. 4. Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. 5. Provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line, and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. 6. Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. 7. Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (Section 18.755.050.C). 8. Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. 9. Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 10. Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. 11. Provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover a possible connection to the sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard. If no new lateral is required, then no permit is needed. The applicant will need to submit five (5) copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 2 OF 22 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform the half-street improvement in SW Hall Boulevard. The improvement shall be constructed to the ODOT interim standard, with a pavement width of 25 feet from centerline to curb. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide, to meet City standards. A copy of the ODOT permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 2,640.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 19. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility (paver system) for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 3 OF 22 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found a Zone Change and Annexation for the .42 acre parcel to be annexed into the City of Tigard. No other land- use cases are associated with this parcel. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard. The site is bordered on the east and south sides by property zoned (R-5) Residential. Property to the north is zoned (C-P) Professional Commercial and property to the west is separated from the subject site by SW Hall Boulevard. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET One letter was sent to Staff from Terry Wolff. The letter listed the following concerns: 36-inch Oak tree at the rear of the lot. How will the rear of the lot be retained. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant has not decided whether or not the 36-inch Oak tree will remain. However, no Arborist report or protection plan has been submitted. Therefore, the applicant has been conditioned in the decision to provide an Arborist report and protection plan for all trees over 12-inches in diameter. According to the proposed site plan and the applicant's narrative, the eastern property line will be retained by a masonry retaining wall. However, the applicant has not indicated how tall the wall will be. Therefore, the applicant has been conditioned in the decision to provide information regarding the height of the wall. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 4 OF 22 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-P: Professional Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-P Proposed Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft 18,265 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 96 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 89 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[3] - -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - -Rear yard 0/20 ft[3] 24.5 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Maximum Height 45 ft 22 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 69% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-P zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Site Development Review criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Hall Boulevard, which is a public street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 5 OF 22 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. The applicant has indicated that ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation) requires a joint access easement for the subject property and the property to the south. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Hall Boulevard, a public street. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, includin the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the samelot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb nine. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows the curb cut at the entrance drive to be constructed out of concrete and is approximately 5 feet from the southern property line. The width of the driveway approach is 24 feet and is roughly 145 feet from the intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oak Street right-of-way line. Therefore, this standard has been met. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance on the west façade to the west property line and connects to SW Hall Boulevard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 6 OF 22 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot -horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does cross the proposed parking lot associated with this project. The portion of the walkway that crosses the parking lot is approximately 25 feet. However, the applicant has not shown the walkway to have pavement markings. Therefore, the applicant will be conditioned to provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts concrete sidewalks, which meets the standard. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has one point of access from SW Hall Boulevard into the parking lot that is 24 feet wide. Therefore, this standard has been met. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The site plan shows the access drives to accommodate for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 7 OF 22 To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The subject property is surrounded by residentially zoned property on all sides but the north side, which is also, zoned C-P. According to the site plan, the parking area abuts the northern property line, thus increasing the possibility to connect to the adjoining property in the future. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed site has approximately 95 feet of frontage on SW Hall Boulevard. According to the criterion above, street trees are only required for developments fronting on a public or private street more than 100 feet in length. Therefore, this standard does not apply. However, staff encourages the applicant to plant street trees to increase the aesthetic value of the area. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. Property to the north is zoned (C-P) Professional Commercial. Property to the east and south of the subject site is zoned (R-5) Medium Density Residential, and property to the west is zoned (C-G) General Commercial. According to the buffering matrix (Table 18.745.1) the site is required to provide buffering according to the "D" buffering standard. The site plan shows the site providing between 21 and 29 feet of buffering, which consists of a 6-foot fence on top of a proposed retaining wall, Rhododendrons, Birch trees and lawn. However, the applicant has not indicated the what kind of fence is being used. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 8 OF 22 The proposed parking area associated with this project is visible from SW Hall Boulevard and adjoining properties to the north and south. The site plan shows the parking area to be screened to the south with a retaining wall, one Birch tree and 3-rhododendrons. The proposed parking lot is screened from the western property line abutting SW Hall Boulevard by lawn only. The northern property line will be screened with 8-rhododendrons and a birch tree. However, staff cannot determine what kind of ground cover is proposed on the northern property line. The parking lot will be developed with 13 parking stalls, requiring one landscaped island with 4-rhododendrons and one Birch tree. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line and the western property line to be landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link, the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. Provide a plan showing the type of round cover to be planted along the northern property line, and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off irom the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has not indicated which of the 4 methods are used to demonstrate compliance and no sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility has been provided. Therefore, the applicant must provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 9 OF 22 located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking.area if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storagge. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The site plan shows the trash enclosure to be located near the southern property line within the side yard. The placement of the enclosure is near the front of the proposed building, which enhances its accessibility, and it will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Therefore, this standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The applicant has not addressed what material the trash enclosure will be constructed out of, its height or its gate openings. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (18.755.050.C). FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4-methods of compliance for Mixed Sold Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. • Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards (18.755.050.C). Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The parking lot associated with this project, at the furthest point away from the proposed building, is 74 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 10 OF 22 Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the develo ment, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3 Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in ection 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will have a total of 13 parking stalls. Therefore, no carpool/vanpool stalls are required. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site plan shows the site will have a total of 13 parking stalls. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan provides for 1 ADA accessible parking stall located in the newly configured parking lot. Therefore, this standard has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 11 OF 22 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly_and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). However, plans show no structures within the visual clearance triangle. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety . The plans submitted show the parking spaces, and both access isles will be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not addressed wheel stops in the narrative or on the site plan. According to the standard above, all parking stalls along the boundaries of the project and adjacent to the interior walkway are required to be provided with wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls (7.5 x 18.5). Aisle widths meet the minimum standard of 24 feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 12 OF 22 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Daycare is 1.5 spaces per classroom. The proposed building will have a total of 6 classrooms and will be required to provide a 9-stall bicycle rack. The narrative indicates bicycle parking will be provided on the south side of the proposed building. However, the site plan does not indicate how many stalls are to be provided. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required -for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle arking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, Staff is unable to confirm that this standard is met. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a Daycare is 1.5 spaces per classroom. Therefore, based on a 6-classroom daycare, the site is required to provide a 9-stall bicycle rack. The applicant has been conditioned earlier to provide evidence of a 9-stall bicycle rack. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Commercial Daycare Use is 2.0 spaces per classroom and the maximum is 3.2 spaces per classroom. Based on a 6-classroom daycare, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 19 parking spaces. The plans provide 13 parking spaces. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 13 OF 22 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed daycare is approximately 5,035 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. • Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-P Zoning District. The site plan shows an interior illuminated monument sign near the entrance to the site. However, the applicant has not addressed the sign criteria under 18.780.130.D (Signs in the C-P Zone). Therefore, the applicant will be required to apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because the applicant has indicated an interior illuminated monument sign near the entrance of the site and has not addressed the sign criteria, this standard has not been satisfied. Therefore, the applicant will be required to comply with the following condition: CONDTION: Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be rovided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has indicated that a 34-inch Oak tree exists onsite. However, the applicant has not shown the tree on the site plan. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a plan showing all trees on the site, the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 14 OF 22 Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street ri9ht- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. No obstructions are shown or have been proposed within the visual clearance triangle. Therefore, this standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. The site is not in an area identified as prone to sliding. According to City overlay maps, the subject site is shown as class #1 soil type, which is considered a Aloha soil/silt loam. The USGS Conservation District considers the soil to be somewhat of a poorly drained soil. However, the subject site's topography is substantially level, thus decreasing the chance of sliding and drainage of the site is defined in detail under section 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The proposed building is surrounded by lawn and landscaping, which is adequate for light and air circulation. The Building Division has made fire-fighting considerations later in this decision. The proposed alterations to the site will not change the existing grade significantly enough to disturb the natural or physical environment. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 15 OF 22 • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Windows are located around the entire building. The site plan shows a parking lot light at the entrance of the site. Trash enclosures and bicycle parking areas are located toward the front of the building. Therefore, this criterion has been met. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. The site has frontage on a section of SW Hall Boulevard. This section of Hall Boulevard is not part of a Tri-met transit route. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-P) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have been met. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires an arterial street to have a 90-foot right-of-way width and a five-lane paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Hall Boulevard, which is classified as an arterial street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. At present, there is approximately 20 feet of ROW from centerline, according to the most recent tax assessor's map. The applicant should dedicate additional ROW to ODOT to provide a total of 45 feet from the centerline. The applicant's materials indicate they will provide this dedication. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 16 OF 22 SW Hall Boulevard is currently paved, but not improved to full standard. As an interim improvement, ODOT has been requiring developers to construct SW Hall Boulevard to a S- lane standard, with the pavement width at 25 feet from centerline to curb. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should construct a half-street improvement to the ODOT interim standard. The applicant's plans indicate they will provide this improvement. A permit from ODOT will be required prior to construction. Access: The applicant's proposed new driveway apron to SW Hall Boulevard has been approved by ODOT, and the location as shown on the plan is acceptable to the City. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By constructing the half-street improvement on SW Hall Boulevard, this standard will be met. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard that has sufficient capacity to serve this site. The applicant's plan indicates they plan to make use of an existing lateral. However, City as-built information indicates the existing lateral is closer to the north property line of this site, versus the location shown on the applicant's plans. The applicant will need to resolve this issue prior to construction. If a new lateral is required, then a permit from the City will be required for the new sewer tap. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The topography of this site slopes to the west toward SW Hall Boulevard. The established residential properties to the east are higher in elevation than this site. The proposed area drains, to be located on the east and south sides of the new building, will accommodate any surface flows affecting this site. These area drains will then flow into the onsite storm drainage system. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 17 OF 22 Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide detention in an onsite detention pipe under the parking lot. The sizing calculations submitted by the applicant's engineer are acceptable. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 18 OF 22 Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under- grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 96 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $2,640.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site is located in the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) service area. The plans show that the applicant intends to adjust the existing meter for the site to serve the new building. Any approvals needed from TVWD shall be acquired prior to construction. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The applicant's plans indicate they plan to incorporate a paver system for the parking lot that will have a gravel filter below it. The gravel filter and soil infiltration will provide the necessary treatment levels required by CWS. The applicant's calculations have already been reviewed and approved by CWS. Staff also supports the proposal. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 19 OF 22 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading and erosion control plan must be submitted to the Building Division during the site permit review phase. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of a site permit. For this project, the addressing fee will be $30.00, because the address for the existing duplex unit will be retired once the structure is demolished. A new address number will be assigned to the new daycare facility. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.3901 Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:' Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $21,592 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $67,475 ($21 ,592 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $45,883. The applicant has proposed to construct half-street improvements along SW Pfaffle Street since this is the frontage they are obtaining access from. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $55,440 (2,400 square feet x $12.00 per square foot, $28,800 + 96 feet x $250 per linear foot for street improvements, + 96 feet x $27.50 for underground utilities), Therefore, the required improvements are roughly proportional. At any rate, the applicant has proposed to construct these improvements. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 20 OF 22 SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Operations Utility Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • The applicant must follow all provisions described in Section 18.790.30.1 (Tree Removal). The City of Tigard Advanced Planning Division has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Access, Hydrant and hydrant location approved by TVFR. • If the site includes fencing, it must comply with OSSC. Section 1007.3.11 . The site as drawn may have a problem with compliance with this section. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the applicant's submittal and provided the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the minimum fire flow is available in the area. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. A minimum of 2 fire hydrants shall be provided for this project. (UFC 903.4) 3. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901 .4.3) 4. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) 5. A Knox brand key box shall be provided on the building. Contact the Fire Marshal's Office for installation details and an application. (UFC Chapter 9) 6. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01, Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, go to www.tvfr.com, choose "Fire Prevention", then choose "New Construction". (UFC Appendix III-F) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 21 OF 22 SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 17, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 31, 2001. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. %>" /, . 1 c -- — August 17, 2001 _ PREPAR 2 BY 1 Eithew Schei.egger DATE Assistant Planner Al ��il�, August 17, 2001 9 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be ersdorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00008.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PAGE 22 OF 22 ' II, CITY of TIGARD ---1 n, ill GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ST ��^ -� Q ¢ — — VICINITY MAP co � r LOCUST 1 , ___1 O II MAPLELEAF ST — Q SDR200 I -00008 7 I_ :-,1- __L . MAPLELEAF ST HALL DAYCARE k 1 FACILITY 4:7 / ST SITE OAK ST / _____ ■ r- PINE ST " I , 1 1 _PI VE S Mt — - . I SPRCE SPRICE ST l J ST • a , _ N TH RN S f Q mho I=- T . Z 0 200 400 600 Feet co co ` , ' 1"=404 feet T VE S r Aik IIIIIS i ) City o of Tigard I I r 27), w Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. l 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 ST i 503)639-4171 0' •F— http://www.ct.tigard.or.us \ Jr'r y Plot date:Jul 9,2001;C:�rnagic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development / I , 1 I ; I I i I WOW . I I I AN 1 LOT 2 LOT 1 I..- a 1800 4 •i 10.84 S 00181.4.5.1 1/10-TY 17.00 .. ....• ..... .... .....•• ■... ..■ — 1144-=481•■•al-44.-mwwwww4N1-1411- -•---,•-..--. 114. •••• - -- 073.32•Ann ococowo 1--- I , _ . a . ............./. .. . ...w. .____ ___ . . • g I • • . a ■ DUPLEX SOTUCTUK • • ■ , :, 9- . . . . . . : IN.LION • . 0 - 211111=11111115TAMIIIM g g i- '- ---e.------7.--------' PROPOSED BUILDING • • . 1 - . r 5,029 S.F. • '8 00 ■ 15, _..t. 2.1 3 0 1 .. g P . 8 • 14 A • i 8 : C"-- NEW CONCAVE '- ILA PAVERS MT 1 ADAM PAICLENT-) . _ 24804 . 4 4.■ el . NEW AM LIGHT • womm-per SIGN .._., i 4,411.1 A NONLAAENt SIMI • ItAVIIMACE WC . - • ill 01:0.71.1O/TETT PLAY AREA NUM ; 4 ,. _____. :..■.:'..:,, ..',:.:.AIM- 8'.4 S' 0010 C00144 WALL (175.32..0-TER OfOCA now • 'tilt • --- . • _ _ _ ___________ __ _ • A,saus,s, WM" NEW a'fENCf OR 117 Of NEW RE TAPONG WALL 10511114 REZACCNAAL PRIVEWAY I I LOT 5 LOT 6 ___________ I MON ggglIXTOTAL 1 2k/3k CITY OF TIGARD t _________ SDR2001-00008 CITY OF TIGARD -- SITE P LAN N HALL DAYCARE FACILITY (Map is not to scale) , EXHIBIT B George & Pamela Wall SDR2001-00008 ' 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Tigard, OR 97224 Terry Wolff 10545 SW 85th Avenue Portland, OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITVOFTIGARD Community Devefopment Shaping (Better Community I, 'Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of7igar , Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check App,cpnate Box(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2001-00008/HAIL DAYCARE FACILITY ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on August 11,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on August17,2001, postage prepaid. (Person that Prepare• otice) STA'1t orF oREGoW ) County of`Was tngton )ss. City of?igard ) 44 / 411.J•Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of s. , 2001. OFFICIAL SEAL / w:,�..,... DIANE M JELDERKS � NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON le It 1'd COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 HOT RY PUBLIC OF U E6 My Commission Expir • 7/7/9-3 EXHI r NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 1Y.. CITY OF TIOARD Community HALL DAYCARE FACILITY Shaping Deveoment apingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 10/31/2001 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00008 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with 6 classrooms and an associated outdoor play area. APPLICANT: George and Pamela Wall OWNER: Same 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (250 per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 17, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2001 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. A eal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON AUGUST 31, 2001. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171 , Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. -, - Cily of TIGARD— —1 _ _J LILL_, ::/5-:1 t j , VICINITY MAP r i.�-- ..�° Q LOCUST - MWLELEAP ST Mill?° 1,. < � — J _ L SDR200 I-00008 111'11111 M.. _ I f- - IN∎�:d I': :;"'= �sT I 1 HALL DAYCARE �: ■g" AEU r , 1 FACILITY .�� '. / •.. ST NM ENE _ 7/ - .. . 1111111 1 ' L PINE ST pIVE — 7 mow , _ .... --\. rim 1 I 1 7 1 l E lr.= SPRJCE sr ST II 1 1 1 u�. GP/ A i ( , —'u11 . . Y MI MI 16mom ________ ®I Z- City o d • le I= -� ate—- aw.r.m I ..� I I -- LOT s LOT I 6 i I — - __ tors ..... �:.. ... I I.OT e i 1111 ........... hA CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2001.00008 SIT'EC PLAN N HALL DAYCARE FACILITY (Map is not to scale) 1 LXHI 1 S 135AA-02304 1 S 1368 C-01301 ALLEN MARILYN L CRANER ELIZABETH HARRIS& 8525 SW OAK ST CRANER RORY LEE TIGARD,OR 97223 8405 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-01900 1S 135AA-03702 ALZNER ROBERT J/SALLY LEA CULLINAN RANDY J AND 10730 SW 85TH AVE KRISTINA G PORTLAND,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00100 1 S 135AD-01200 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 9400 SW OAK ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35AD-00301 1 S 135AD-03400 BELFANTI PETER J DAVIS GENE L 8612 SW PINE ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00901 1 S 135AA-03201 BENNETT PATRICE D DAVIS MICHAEL A AND 10675 SW HALL BLVD LAURI L TIGARD,OR 97223 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02400 15 135AA-03704 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L DE MOULIN STEVE& 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY LINN MARGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1st 35AA-03701 1 S 135AA-03700 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S DEM L STEVE& 8805 SW OAK ST LINN RGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 1045 S 7TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 151368B-04900 1 S 135AA-90000 CICCHETTI SHIRLEY&JAMES A D D CONDOMINIUMS 11277 SW CAPITOL HWY OW RS OF UNITS PORTLAND,OR 97219 0 1 S 13688-048 1 0 1S 135AA-02801 CIC• • SHIRLEY&JAMES A EMMERT TERRY W 1127 1 CAPITAL HWY 11811 SE HWY 212 P!'TLANP,OR 97219 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1813688-04602 1 S 135AD-00200 CLANCY JERRY N& FARANCE MARGARET D TR BOHRER CHRISTINE M 1222 SW MAPLE CREST DR 10326 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1368 C-03400 1 S 135AA-03500 FIELDS PATRICIA H HILL RONALD A 8400 SW PINE ST 10550 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-01302 1 S 135AD-00400 FLOYD MICHAEL CHERYL S HOGREFE OWEN&MARILYN 10570 SW 85TH 13045 SW HEATHER CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1 S 135AA-02305 1 S 135AA-02900 GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND JOHNSON ELIZABETH A JANE A 8520 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AA-02300 1 S 135AD-00900 GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON JUVE ALICE SARAH 8515 SW OAK 10655 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-01400 1S 135AA-04300 GUSTAFSON RICHARD M AND KINDRICK ALFRED R BARBARA K HATTIE M 8323 SW PINE 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02700 1 S 135AA-03200 H E PROPERTIES KINDRICK ALFRED R/HATTIE M BY HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 10565 SW 85TH 3077 NW ST HELENS RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1 S 135AA-02202 1 S 136B C-01300 HARDING ROBERT B KOCH PATRICK L GRACIA K 4130 SW ALICE 8475 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BB-04700 1 S 136BC-01000 HENSLEIGH JAY E KUHN JACK H&PAULINE S 10410 SW 85TH 2315 19TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 1 S 135AD-05400 1 S 135AA-02201 HERMANN HEIDI J M LANDER GENE C TR& 10780 SW SITKA CT LANDER SHARON R TR TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AA-04500 1 S135AA-02302 HICKS GRANT F/LINDA M LEE CARL M 10525 SW 85TH AVE 8505 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 is 135AA-02500' 1S 135AA-02200 LYON DONALD J HAZEL J POLLOCK DONLAD E 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135AD-05300 1 S 135AA-02100 MANDELL ANNA M TR POL DONLAD E 10775 SW SITKA CT 1834 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 P TLA D,OR 97201 1 S 135AD-05200 1S 135AA-03000 MAR PAUL RAINS KENNETH W&LEIGH ANN 10735 SW SITKA CT 16258 SW JESSE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 1 S 135AA-02303 1S 136B B-04604 MARKELL KIMBERLY D RICHARDSON MARION R 10405 SW 85TH AVE CLARA M TIGARD,OR 97223 10380 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 1368 C-03300 1 S 135AA-03705 MELBY GARY P AND DOROTHY A ROMERO MERCEDES G AND 8400 SW PINE ST MOLINA MARTHA A TIGARD,OR 97223 10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-03600 1 S 135AA-03400 M GARY P AND DOROTHY A ROSE DOREEN C 840 PINE ST 10580 SW HALL BLVD TI ARD, R 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-01100 1S 135AD-05600 MOON BRETT A&SHERRIE A RUST KEITH A 8807 SW SPRUCE 10730 SW SITKA CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 151 35AD-05500 1 S 135AD-00700 O'FRIEL MICHAEL JOSEPH& SKINNER BRYAN K& ASHLEY REBECCA MELISSA B 10760 SW SITKA CT 10725 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02600 1S13688-05000 PETERSON THEODORE S AND SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM DEAN VIRGINIA J 8319 SW OAK ST 8686 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90001 1 S 135AA-02000 PETTY JOHN A STARTS SANDRA LYNN 10301 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 20007 TIGARD,OR 97223 KEIZER,OR 97307 is 135AD-00800 1 S 135AA-03600 STORMONT PATRICIA JO WRIGHT JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILENE 10685 SW 85TH AVENUE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01200 THORNE MARTIN DALE ET AL Go WILLIAMS GREG 12001 SW 29TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 136BC-03500 TIDYMAN JOAN S 10690 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BB-04600 TORKKO DAVID A 8390 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 D 5800 THE ERRACE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-6 1 S 135AA-03300 URCIEL GILBERT 8609 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S136BC-01100 VANCIL KENNETH M 8418 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 135AD-00300 WALKER DOUGLAS B AND ROSEMARIE G 6880 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S1 35AA-02800 WALL GEORGE&PAMELA J 11620 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S135AA-04400 WOLFF TERRY LEE&LISA KAY 10545 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:lcurpinlsetupllabels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 19-Jun-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • CITY OF 1 iuARU CITY H^!_L/r'LANNING DIV. - - �s4% i �W �'nLLBLVD. ---- Tk. •U, Or-t 97223 t"3/0/ 1 S 135AD-00100 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY P-1/1"1111-- 9400 SW OAK ST sat- '- ,mil p./ TIGARD,OR 97223 Uatscto,_ UHt:44VU 1/ U0/ 1/01 r'U►4WNkD TIME EXP I. TN TU SEND 8AERTLEIN 8504 5W PINE ST TIGARD OR 97223-8781 RETURN TO SENDER 71 ' 1 llfi�:f: ,is�i�i::l:l:►11:i:,i:::�lil.l::i�i::ll:::l - . it AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community STATE OT oGoN ) County of-Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsforc4 being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialstfor the City of 2'igard Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: pled(Appopriate Box(e)Bebw) © NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2001-00008/HALL DAYCARE FACILITY ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on July 9,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on July 9,2001, postage prepaid. 1/4:e - , ; 'Grrd----/ (Person that Prep. ed N. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 3 r-4 day of , 2001. f'- OFFICIAL SEAL ,' :" DIANE M JELDERKS �"`� ' ' NOTARY P OWF3I2657N / / ��' COMMISSION N0.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07.2003 / te41-t-A I . Issioo', ;_I,.a ii : , 0_3 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENI .DER,VENDOR OR SELLER: EXHI i i A THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ` �� CITY OF TIGARD Community Development SkapingA Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: July 9, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 23, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 9, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address 3 relevant approval criteria with s jent specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: ♦ The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. ♦ The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled Your Right to Provide Written Comments. • hi OjO4,CITY oIuTIGAR Dy J , ST .-F - - -4 --h VICINITY MAP ' I f I 1 ■� —= LOCUST � .. _< — _ r MR2001-00008 uunui I- ��pii n��ri AAAPLELEAF ST HALL DAYCARE ' �� ' ■=E —f- - FACILITY SITE OAK pip, i min ' ST III -� PINE sr I. p1VE I I■=OM 5 -11- i lI Imre= k* I-I ) 1 ST J1.111111 VIIIII" - I mull _ -- _ ' City of Tigard • — :41 IIII .maMrMM11Ntar•ra '1wrmo”* ∎ tom 1N7/aW 11�aM 1 TI'll Or A8. �aa1.11r1 i1e...uoi—g EXHIBIT B 1 S 135AA-0•304 1 S 136BC-01301 ALLEN MARILYN L CRANER ELIZABETH HARRIS& 8525 SW OAK ST CRANER RORY LEE TIGARD,OR 97223 8405 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-01900 1 S 135AA-03702 ALZNER ROBERT J/SALLY LEA CULLINAN RANDY J AND 10730 SW 85TH AVE KRISTINA G PORTLAND,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00100 1 S 135AD-01200 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 9400 SW OAK ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 5 135AD-00301 1 S 135AD-03400 BELFANTI PETER J DAVIS GENE L 8612 SW PINE ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AD-00901 1S135AA-03201 BENNETT PATRICE D DAVIS MICHAEL A AND 10675 SW HALL BLVD LAURI L TIGARD,OR 97223 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02400 15 135AA-03704 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L DE MOULIN STEVE& 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY LINN MARGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 is 135AA-03701 1 S 135AA-03700 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S DEM L STEVE& 8805 SW OAK ST LINN RGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 1045 S 7TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1513613B-04900 1 S 135AA-90000 CICCHETTI SHIRLEY&JAMES A D D CONDOMINIUMS 11277 SW CAPITOL HWY OW RS OF UNITS PORTLAND,OR 97219 0 1 S 136 B B-048 1 0 1S 135AA-02801 CIC•C SHIRLEY&JAMES A EMMERT TERRY W 1127 1 CAPITAL HWY 11811 SE HWY 212 Pe'TLANN,OR 97219 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1 S 1366 B-04602 1S 135AD-00200 CLANCY JERRY N& FARANCE MARGARET D TR BOHRER CHRISTINE M 1222 SW MAPLE CREST DR 10326 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 136BC-03400 1S 135AA-03500 FIELDS PATRICIA H HILL RONALD A 8400 SW PINE ST 10550 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136 B C-01302 1S 135AD-00400 FLOYD MICHAEL CHERYL S HOGREFE OWEN&MARILYN 10570 SW 85TH 13045 SW HEATHER CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1S 135AA-02305 1 S135AA-02900 GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND JOHNSON ELIZABETH A JANE A 8520 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02300 1S 135AD-00900 GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON JUVE ALICE SARAH 8515 SW OAK 10655 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136B C-01400 1 S 135AA-04300 GUSTAFSON RICHARD M AND KINDRICK ALFRED R BARBARA K HATTIE M 8323 SW PINE 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02700 1 S135AA-03200 H E PROPERTIES KINDRICK ALFRED R/HATTIE M BY HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 10565 SW 85TH 3077 NW ST HELENS RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1 S 135AA-02202 1S136BC-01300 HARDING ROBERT B KOCH PATRICK L GRACIA K 4130 SW ALICE 8475 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 136BB-04700 1 S136BC-01000 HENSLEIGH JAY E KUHN JACK H&PAULINE S 10410 SW 85TH 2315 19TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 1 S 135AD-05400 1 S 135AA-02201 HERMANN HEIDI J M LANDER GENE C TR& 10780 SW SITKA CT LANDER SHARON R TR TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AA-04500 1S 135AA-02302 HICKS GRANT F/LINDA M LEE CARL M 10525 SW 85TH AVE 8505 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02500 1S 135AA-02200 LYON DONALD J HAZEL J POLLOCK DONLAD E 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135AD-05300 1S 135AA-02100 MANDELL ANNA M TR POL DONLAD E 10775 SW SITKA CT 1834 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 P TLA D,OR 97201 1 S 135AD-05200 1S 135AA-03000 MAR PAUL RAINS KENNETH W&LEIGH ANN 10735 SW SITKA CT 16258 SW JESSE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 1 S 135AA-02303 1 S 1368 B-04604 MARKELL KIMBERLY D RICHARDSON MARION R 10405 SW 85TH AVE CLARA M TIGARD,OR 97223 10380 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-03300 1 S 135AA-03705 MELBY GARY P AND DOROTHY A ROMERO MERCEDES G AND 8400 SW PINE ST MOLINA MARTHA A TIGARD,OR 97223 10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 151368C-03600 1 S 135AA-03400 M GARY P AND DOROTHY A 7ROSE DOREEN C 840 PINE ST 10580 SW HALL BLVD TI ARD, R 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-01100 1 S 135AD-05600 MOON BRETT A&SHERRIE A RUST KEITH A 8807 SW SPRUCE 10730 SW SITKA CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-05500 1S 135AD-00700 O'FRIEL MICHAEL JOSEPH& SKINNER BRYAN K& ASHLEY REBECCA MELISSA B 10760 SW SITKA CT 10725 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02600 1S13688-05000 PETERSON THEODORE S AND SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM DEAN VIRGINIA J 8319 SW OAK ST 8686 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90001 1S 135AA-02000 PETTY JOHN A STAATS SANDRA LYNN 10301 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 20007 TIGARD,OR 97223 KEIZER,OR 97307 1 S 135AD-0.0800 1 S 135AA-03600 STORMONT PATRICIA JO WRIGHT JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILENE 10685 SW 85TH AVENUE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136BC-01200 George & Pamela Wall THORNE MARTIN DALE ET AL 111600 SW Bull Mountain Road do WILLIAMS GREG Tigard, OR 97224 12001 SW 29TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S136BC-03500 TIDYMAN JOAN S 10690 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136B B-04600 TORKKO DAVID A 8390 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 D 5800 THE ERRACE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-6 1 S135AA-03300 URCIEL GILBERT 8609 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1513613C-cm loo VANCIL KENNETH M 8418 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00300 WALKER DOUGLAS B AND ROSEMARIE G 6880 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02800 WALL GEORGE&PAMELA J 11620 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S135AA-04400 WOLFF TERRY LEE&LISA KAY 10545 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:\curpin\setupllabels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 19-Jun-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 c, Y,41)6441 1 S 136BB-05000 SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM 8319 SW OAK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2 3-0-0 (--g 6( U£( 4 5MIT319 972233052 1100 20 07/12/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND SMITH ' JEFFREY W PO BOX 23441 PORTLAND OR 97281-3441 'l//g/U RETURN TO SENDER • r. 00\ 1 S 135AD-00100 / BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY • �(Q1� � 9400 SW OAK ST l TIGARD,OR 97223 BAE!-t400 972233104 1500 19 07/12/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND BAERTLLIIN 8504 5W PINE ST TIGARD OR 97225-8781 RETURN TO SENDER ��-:t• •r...r.�.,:..� t�l�l fl!!l i3l�.I!!it�l fl�!!!�ll�t�lFll�!!�!!!!!i!�!!�!1!{31�1� ti� a■a aa� / ��• — CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 111111 AREA NOTIFIED - (500') 2--,...,L. """' --,...,L. MAPLELEAF _—_ 1 181351102202 15135AA02000 —413011100)1 181351102100 18/78 880160 i 1.135U02200 — I 413011048N BusuB2:n 8aeeiouo4 FOR: George Wall 13135111103705 N - J RE: 1 S 13 5M, 2800 m25ua37Y J 81351102 3 0 0 1513 5AA02303 1S13151W00 RE: 13135AA02500 < 81351102400 1 1373519109704 T 181360004900 _ / y 7513 102305 1135AA0233 3135AA02302 131a0880pN I513861104800 15175AA03102 \ST�l 1 \ OAK/r,K Property owner information O�`11\ �/ /'1f� t valid for 3 months from SUBJECT SITE the date printed on this map. 03N1 131366C01100 35111107700 ti `*S •• - 8175500800 ` 01100 88511M500 151360001230 181351001200 18135110850 15135AA04300 151361601302 181351103600 51851108800 - I 8180001802181368C01400 i81350103400 . 35AA83201 1313511103200 1513613C01300 PINE ST PINE 1513511000900 151351006301 181351000300 181351000100 • 181366003600 N -- 12185A0002BB 1S'3000O3 1 N uaneBisB 151851000901 131356800400 111135110001100 151306C0350 0 100 200 300 Feet 151351005400 510053 31 1S735A000700 1'=203 feel 13135AOO110D 13500055QQJJ0 13115A093400 18 9500052 74500056Q0 - • '...t,BOO - 151366001900 dillk 1 I 1 )A, City of Tigard n SPRUCE ST 0 SPRUCE Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. UMW 1— I 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 I r (503)6394171 ,I http Jhvww.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Jul 5,2001;C:MagicWIAGIC03.APR 1S 135AA-02304 1 S 136 BC-01301 ALLEN MARILYN L CRANER ELIZABETH HARRIS& 8525 SW OAK ST CRANER RORY LEE TIGARD,OR 97223 8405 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01900 1S 135AA-03702 ALZNER ROBERT J/SALLY LEA CULLINAN RANDY J AND 10730 SW 85TH AVE KRISTINA G PORTLAND,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00100 1 S 135AD-01200 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 9400 SW OAK ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35AD-00301 1 S 135AD-03400 BELFANTI PETER J DAVIS GENE L 8612 SW PINE ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135A0-00901 1 S 135AA-03201 BENNETT PATRICE D DAVIS MICHAEL A AND 10675 SW HALL BLVD LAURI L TIGARD,OR 97223 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-03704 CAIN JAMES L&DARLENE L DE MOULIN STEVE& 14300 SW PACIFIC HWY LINN MARGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-03701 1S135AA-03700 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S DEM' L STEVE& 8805 SW OAK ST LINN RGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 1045 S 7TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 151368B-04900 1S135AA-90000 CICCHETTI SHIRLEY&JAMES A D D CONDOMINIUMS 11277 SW CAPITOL HWY OW RS OF UNITS PORTLAND,OR 97219 0 1S13688-048 0 1S135AA-02801 CIC E I SHIRLEY&JAMES A EMMERT TERRY W 1127 CAPITAL HWY 11811 SE HWY 212 POVTLAN ,OR 97219 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1513668-04602 1 S 135AD-00200 CLANCY JERRY N& FARANCE MARGARET D TR BOHRER CHRISTINE M 1222 SW MAPLE CREST DR 10326 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136BC-03400 1S135AA-03500 FIELDS PATRICIA H HILL RONALD A 8400 SW PINE ST 10550 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01302 1 S 135AD-00400 FLOYD MICHAEL CHERYL S HOGREFE OWEN&MARILYN 10570 SW 85TH 13045 SW HEATHER CT TIGARD, OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 is135AA-02305 1S135AA-02900 GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND JOHNSON ELIZABETH A JANE A 8520 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 13135AA-02300 15135AD-00900 GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON JUVE ALICE SARAH 8515 SW OAK 10655 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 13136BC-01400 1S135AA-04300 GUSTAFSON RICHARD M AND KINDRICK ALFRED R BARBARA K HATTIE M 8323 SW PINE 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02700 1S135AA-03200 H E PROPERTIES KINDRICK ALFRED R/HATTIE M BY HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC 10565 SW 85TH 3077 NW ST HELENS RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97210 1S135AA-02202 1S136BC-01300 HARDING ROBERT B KOCH PATRICK L GRACIA K 4130 SW ALICE 8475 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 136B8-04700 1S136BC-01000 HENSLEIGH JAY E KUHN JACK H&PAULINE S 10410 SW 85TH 2315 19TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 15135AD-05400 1S135AA-02201 HERMANN HEIDI J M LANDER GENE C TR& 10780 SW SITKA CT LANDER SHARON R TR TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AA-04500 1S135AA-02302 HICKS GRANT F/LINDA M LEE CARL M 10525 SW 85TH AVE 8505 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AA-02500 is 135AA-02200 LYON DONALD J HAZEL J POLLOCK DONLAD E 10440 SW 87TH AVE 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 15135AD-05300 1S135AA-02100 MANDELL ANNA M TR POL DONLAD E 10775 SW SITKA CT 1834 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 P , TLA D,OR 97201 1S 135A0-05200 1 S 135AA-03000 MAR PAUL RAINS KENNETH W&LEIGH ANN 10735 SW SITKA CT 16258 SW JESSE CT TIGARD, OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 1S135AA-02303 1S136BB-04604 MARKELL KIMBERLY D RICHARDSON MARION R 10405 SW 85TH AVE CLARA M TIGARD,OR 97223 10380 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 is 136BC-03300 1 S 135AA-03705 MELBY GARY P AND DOROTHY A ROMERO MERCEDES G AND 8400 SW PINE ST MOLINA MARTHA A TIGARD,OR 97223 10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 15136BC-03600 is 135AA-03400 7M GARY P AND DOROTHY A ROSE DOREEN C 840 PINE ST 10580 SW HALL BLVD TI ARD, R 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-01100 1 S 135AD-05600 MOON BRETT A&SHERRIE A RUST KEITH A 8807 SW SPRUCE 10730 SW SITKA CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-05500 1 S 135AD-00700 O'FRIEL MICHAEL JOSEPH& SKINNER BRYAN K& ASHLEY REBECCA MELISSA B 10760 SW SITKA CT 10725 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 15135AA-02600 1S136BB-05000 PETERSON THEODORE S AND SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM DEAN VIRGINIA J 8319 SW OAK ST 8686 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90001 IS 135AA-02000 PETTY JOHN A STAATS SANDRA LYNN 10301 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 20007 TIGARD,OR 97223 KEIZER,OR 97307 1S135AD-00800 1s135AA-03600 STORMONT PATRICIA JO WRIGHT JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILENE 10685 SW 85TH AVENUE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01200 THORNE MARTIN DALE ET AL c/o WILLIAMS GREG 12001 SW 29TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 is 136BC-03500 TIDYMAN JOAN S 10690 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S1 36B B-04600 TORKKO DAVID A 8390 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1'y D 5800 THE ERRACE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-6 1 S 135AA-03300 URCIEL GILBERT 8609 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136BC-01100 VANCIL KENNETH M 8418 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00300 WALKER DOUGLAS B AND ROSEMARIE G 6880 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02800 WALL GEORGE&PAMELA J 11620 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 135AA-04400 WOLFF TERRY LEE&LISA KAY 10545 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 i:\curpin\setup\Iabels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 19-Jun-01 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Michael Trigoboff 7072 SW Barbara Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD SapingtlBetter f Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: S03-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST FOR 51 k 'O o -_ br iR OWNER MAIUNG US! Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ve-Ck( PHONE: 503/ 7O " 74. /5V This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. * EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * A_sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 ` sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = $ k x _ sets = SA" 1_ sheets of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $ 4.00 / sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = $ 1 x sets = S — GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $3(1 • CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED OCT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C T -- 6 ?nor ,�,.1h PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 Community(Development 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Shaping f7(Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 91223 PHONE: S03-639-4111 FAX: 503-684-1291(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) REQUEST POR 10 o 10 ..IP 'U ', R:, OWNER MAILING-LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. IS134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): / / / o INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: 3 (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: _627ff.p,y2 /4/ c PHONE: G' ,13' ( 170 /27///' This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE—TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE * * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets of labels x $2/sheet = x sets = $16.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = $ Z' x 3 sets = 2 sheets of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area x . sets = $ 4.00 sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = $rt x,3 sets = $e•Q' GENERATE LIST = $1100 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = $411 Q CITY of TIGARD GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED - rL -m'u"`°°°°' J - MAPLELEAF (500') _ 111135111112202 �B111•011Be1 TT1i61A020B0 151359902100 1B138B108/0 -- 111359902200 13135990::01 = FOR: GEORGE WALL F- H 111361111040114 1'"1"""" CO J M� RE: 151351111,02800 la'usALii J 131359901200 1`13W59902303 w swum. 131359902500 131359902800 l 11181A1032ee 151311113041100 / = 1313 A►02305 101366* 301 uO/w°5100 llsusuozaoo �/w081w l 11_"_ 1L1a611037K A T - z _SUBJECT SIT OAK Property owner information is valid for 3 months from OAK the date printed on this map. 101759902101 mibAA02900 R/359907000 131361130110 1B185Y021w 131359902200 11138°001000 i0131759900500 \ 131380001700 • 131759901200 51107501 131359904300 11113/1001302 11115U03106 3511103300 31381001701131355001400 1359907000 15135111103 201 17135111103290 101311001104 PINE ST PINE 131351000e00 131351100030 1313511000300 Imam= • L3111C031190 N 1-- 01115111100200 3/11011*3 111 3110 03 7 04 J 111135A11000111 1317511000400 1313511000800 181385C0150 0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet 131399005400 „ 5110053 1-=199 feet 1313511001100 1351190551 1317511000700 c. 1413590 u 7511°°52 . 13511°05810 .43.1100 1313811001010 _ City of Tigard SPRUCEST Info mal on on this map is for general location only and SPRUCE should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd -- Tigard,OR 97223 _ (503)539-4171 http://vwwi.o.figard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Oct 6,2000;C:lmagic MAGIC03.APR 1S 35AA-02304 1 S 1368 C-01301 ALLEN MARILYN L CRANER ELIZABETH HARRIS& 8525 SW OAK ST CRANER RORY LEE TIGARD,OR 97223 8405 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 1369C-01900 1S 135AA-03702 ALZNER ROBERT J/SALLY LEA CULLINAN RANDY J AND 10730 SW 85TH AVE KRISTINA G PORTLAND,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00100 1 S 135AD-01200 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 9400 SW OAK ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AD-00301 1 S135AD-03400 BELFANTI PETER J DAVIS GENE L 8612 SW PINE ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AD-00901 1S 135AA-03201 BENNETT PATRICE D DAVIS MICHAEL A AND 10675 SW HALL BLVD LAURI L TIGARD,OR 97223 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02400 1S135AA-03704 CAIN JAMES L DE MOULIN STEVE& 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD LINN MARGARET SHERWOOD,OR 97140 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AA-03701 1 S 135AA-03700 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S DEMOULIN STEVE& 8805 SW OAK ST LINN MARGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1513699-04800 1 S 135AA-90000 CICCHETTI SHIRLEY&JAMES A DEOAR '•NDOMINIUMS 11277 SW CAPITAL HWY OWNE"+ OF UNITS PORTLAND,OR 97219 , 0 1S136B -04900 1S135AA-02801 CICCHE I HIRLEY&JAMES A EMMERT TERRY W 11277 S PITOL HWY 11811 SE HWY 212 PORTL D,OR 97219 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1S 13668-04602 1S 135AD-00200 CLANCY JERRY N& FARANCE MARGARET D TR BOHRER CHRISTINE M 1222 SW MAPLE CREST DR 10326 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S i 36BC-01302 1S 135AD-00400 FLOYD MICHAEL CHERYL S HOGREFE OWEN&MARILYN 10570 SW 85TH 13045 SW HEATHER CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 1 S 135AA-02305 1S 135AA-02900 GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND JOHNSON ELIZABETH A JANE A 8520 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02300 1S 135AD-00900 GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON JUVE ALICE SARAH 8515 SW OAK 10655 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136 BC-01400 1 S 135AA-04300 GUSTAFSON RICHARD M AND KINDRICK ALFRED R BARBARA K HATTIE M 8323 SW PINE 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02202 1S 135AA-03200 HARDING ROBERT B KINDRICK ALFRED R/HATTIE M 4130 SW ALICE 10565 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02700 1 S 136 B C-01300 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC KOCH PATRICK L GRACIA K 11640 N LOMBARD 8475 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97203 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BB-04700 1 S136BC-01000 HENSLEIGH JAY E KUHN JACK H&PAULINE S 10410 SW 85TH 2315 19TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 1 S 135AD-05400 1S 135AA-02201 HERMANN HEIDI J M LANDER GENE C TR& 10780 SW SITKA CT LANDER SHARON R TR TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AA-04500 1S135AA-02302 HICKS GRANT F/LINDA M LEE CARL M 10525 SW 85TH AVE 8505 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-03500 1S 135AA-02500 HILL RONALD A LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 10550 SW HALL BLVD 10440 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 135AD-05300 1S 135AA-02200 MANDELL ANNA M TR POLLOCK DONLAD E 10775 SW SITKA CT 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1S 135AD-05200 1S 135AA-02100 MAR PAUL POLLS K PINLAD E 10735 SW SITKA CT 1834 S ''8TH#202 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORT •ND, •R 97201 is 135AA-02303 1S 135AA-03000 MARKELL KIMBERLY D RAINS KENNETH W&LEIGH ANN 10405 SW 85TH AVE 16258 SW JESSE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 1S 136 BC-03300 1S 1368 B-04604 MELBY GARY P AND DOROTHY A RICHARDSON MARION R 8400 SW PINE ST CLARA M TIGARD,OR 97223 10380 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-03400 1S 135AA-03705 M Y RY P AND DOROTHY A ROMERO MERCEDES G AND 8400 PINE ST MOLINA MARTHA A TIGi+RD, 97223 10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 is 136BC-03600 1 S 135AA-03400 ME BY G Y P AND DOROTHY A ROSE DOREEN C 8400 PINE ST 10580 SW HALL BLVD TIG D, 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-01100 1 S 135AD-05600 MOON BRETT A&SHERRIE A RUST KEITH A 8807 SW SPRUCE 10730 SW SITKA CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-05500 1 S 135AD-00700 O'FRIEL MICHAEL JOSEPH& SKINNER BRYAN K& ASHLEY REBECCA ' MELISSA B 10760 SW SITKA CT 10725 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 135AA-02600 1 S 1368 B-05000 PETERSON THEODORE S AND SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM DEAN VIRGINIA J 8319 SW OAK ST 8686 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15135AA-90001 1S135AA-02000 PETTY JOHN A STAATS SANDRA LYNN 10301 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 20007 TIGARD,OR 97223 KEIZER,OR 97307 • 1S135AD-00800 1S135AA-03600 STORMONT PATRICIA JO WRIGHT JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILENE 10685 SW 85TH AVENUE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01200 THORNE MARTIN DALE ET AL Go WILLIAMS GREG 12001 SW 29TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 136BC-03500 TIDYMAN JOAN S 10690 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 is 136BB-04600 TORKKO DAVID A 8390 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AD-0 0 T NT ERRACE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-6 1 S 135AA-03300 URCIEL GILBERT 8609 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01100 VANCIL KENNETH M 8418 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00300 WALKER DOUGLAS B AND ROSEMARIE G 6880 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 135AA-02800 WALL GEORGE&PAMELA J 11620 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 135AA-04400 WOLFF TERRY LEE&LISA KAY 10545 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 . . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ,.', TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: DATE OF PRE-APP.: 8/1/00 <� 1 Property Address/Location(s): 10530 SW Hall Blvd. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tigard OR ��p r Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): 1S1 3 5 AA TL 2 8 0 0 6 Case No.(s): 3til--�'-00 1—0000 Other Case No.(s): « .� Receipt No.: 9,c;Cl - ,Z 1 Site Size: 18270 sq_ f1- . Application Accepted By: bp/_ , Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: George & Pamela Wall Date: • ; Address:11600 SW Bull Mt_ Rd. Phone: 670_7814 City: Tigard Or Zip: 97224 Date Determined Complete: ./ Rev.8/4/2000 i:`.curpin\masters\revised\sdra.doc Applicant": Same Address: Phone: -- City: Zip: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) Application Form roust sign this application in the space provided on the back of this Owner's Signature/Written Authorization form or submit a written authorization with this application. Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Copy of Pre-Application Conf. Notes PROPOSAL SUMMARY id Site/Plot Plan The owners of record of the subject property request Site (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): d Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11") Construction of a day care facility le Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) SA Sewer Use Information Card '� (D' tributed/completed at application submittal) SA Service Provider Letter a 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped 1/ #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes Dol Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) �$ Q-O-QO ($100,000-$999,999)..,i$1 600.OU ) ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000 over the first million) Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: One adjustment to a permitted use where all other provisions of Tigard Code are met. Landscaping at access discussed in landscape narrative. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true, and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of ( .. . 20 or Owner ignature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 v�I Y11.y UI V dbIllrla(Orl • AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 1, Jerry R.'Ha f✓@f►,4reotor of Assess- l� George E. Wall Clerk for sakictoun do Ex0Of co Co that Pamela J. Wall the within instrument of writing was received 14237 SW Twekesbury Dr. and recorded in book of records,"of said Tigard. Oregon 9/224 county. Until a change is requested all tax � statements shall be sent to the following ' address: Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation, Ex- same as above Offici9PountyClerk Doc : 97055661 Escrow No. 3200-17873-MM Rect: 188450 198. 00 Order No. 166702 06/18/1997 09: 23: 53am WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) 2) LINDA M. PRICE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE IRA W. PRICE AND LINDA M. PRICE REVOCABLE --' LIVING TRUST DATED JUNE 12, 1995; Grantor, conveys and warrants to GEORGE E. WALL AND PAMELA J. WALL, HUSBAND AND WIFE 113 Grantee, the following described real property free of enrlrmhranron r+xcrpt nrI nrrr'ifically O :rcl f L l 1, hciclu: Q The Southerly 96 feet of Lot 2, Block 52, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of U Washington and State of Oregon. Z L) This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. ENCUMBRANCES: 6. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 7. Regulations, including levies, liens, assessments, ri•hts of way, and easements of Tualatin Valley Water District. ♦r.� WASHINGTON COUNTY (Continued) � REAL PRROPOITY TRANSFER Ail $ 1�00.0o o0 11111417 The true consideration for this conveyance is $160,000.00 '\ PAID DATE Dated June 12, 1997 ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of its board o .irectors. — Lintw".M. Price, TrIrrthc STATE OF OREGON, County of Washington )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on June 12, , 19 97 , by Linda M. Price, Trustee This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 by as of NuLcly Public i Oregon My commission pires ' � OFFICIAL SEAL / M McDOUGALL r NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON \ % Hall Street Daycare Facility Completed application form Title transfer Written Summary Narrative Landscape Narrative Impact Study Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting USA Service provider letter ODOT service provider letter Pre app Conference notes Filing fee Attached: Vicinity map Existing conditions Map Site Development Plan Public Improvement/Street Plan Prelim utilities Plan Prelim storm Drain Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Architectural Drawings Preliminary Sizing for Detention Facility Addressed Stamped Envelopes ■ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN(7)CALENDAR DAYS;DF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS;AFFIDAVIT TO City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Raft Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 I, (_,--7-€--62,2-,ist-K 1--)A- 1- c—, do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 0.4 `7 G 21-/-2-i92- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) /0_5-'3 t7 S t;3 /r 4 C C 13 L-.1I0 , and did on the 1 3 day of /(/ o !/' /- — R D o -49----- personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a U i application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at / 3 D S 'L) / L L Gl//, p,c( L_� I ^--A- 6_ , 4-.).,/' 4.-c_ "--72--L)Ai ` C— 7 (state location you posted notice on property) --1_4_, _) .A/L__, Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the I 3 day of Nw- ✓ , 1X2.100 6 AIMIEL _! se;g,' OFFICIAL E EAL \��' . '' ELIZABETH P:YRkiii'r NOTARY PUBLIC-OAFCON COMMISSION N^ 3:0858 ! UBLIOF OREGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES HiR.`r za,z_o� My Commission Expires: 3 ,?-3 —069— (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJEC'T'OR PROPOSED NAME:__ �TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:-- -- Name of Applicant/Owner: :Address or General Location of Subject Property: LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and 1,ot U(s): - --____ -- -- __ __— ——————ti VoginlpattOmasterslatipostmst r-E- ^ate •�1 �� :'�• ' w•r�}.��Ir� AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE . - - WITHIN;SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard . Planning Division 13125 S«'dull 3ouIeva d Tigard.,OR 97223.1106 '''.�. ',... • I, C. ---- 62� �1 �Y A- �--do affirm that t am (represent) the - - � P � Party initiating - interest in a proposed L ' 4 C affecting the land located at (state the approxima e location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) /bX,.D S G3 /9A- , and did on the / 3 day of 4/ RD d - —� personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a • -- /12;./y91'Lr application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at / 0 3 O c'L-1) A L L ,t( r„ Liz >d- A- (ice -c / (state location you posted notice on property) Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affim-led before me on the /3 3 day of /11 V 4 , 10 100° OFFICIAL S%34 — • ELIZABETH NOT Y PUBLIC OF GREGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES IiiA:i z3J My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please coin ptet.e information below for proper placement-with proposed project) - ---- -- —• - --- NAME OP PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: — Name ofApplicanUOwner: _ I I Address or General Location of Subject Property: LSubjcct Property Tax Map(s)and Lot i!(s)---- -- ----- ------------ ------ ----------- —hUogmNattyU;■astcrsLittpost.mst DATE 1/29/01 SITE 10530 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD OR 97224 RE PREAPP DATED 8/1/00 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING APPLICANT GEORGE WALL 11600 SW BULL MT. ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 PHONE 503 670-7814 FAX 503 624-0882 On November 14, 2000, the appropriate neighbors were advised of a meeting set for 6:30 p.m., November 29, 2000, to advise or discuss issues relating to the proposed day care. The city's list of potentially interested neighbors is attached. Each address on the list was sent the attached letter. At the meeting two people showed. Terry Wolf lives in the house directly behind the proposed day care site. His concern was the oak tree at the rear of the property. He was advised we have no intentions of removing it unless it is diseased or a danger to the kids. He seemed to have no objection to the day care. Doris Rose came to see who else came. She has no objection to the day care. Additionally, we had three phone calls. All had received letters;none wished to leave his name. One man said he had ten acres nearby and just liked to keep tabs on what was happening. He had no objection to the day care. A lady called to lend moral support. She said she was aware I'd tried to get the day care passed a year ago. She was advised it had not been the fault of the city but rather my lack of focus that caused the delay. She felt anything would be better than what was currently on the property. The third caller said we didn't need any more businesses or traffic on Hall. Attached are the sign-in sheet, letter and list of neighbors and PAC members who were sent letters. RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Dear Neighbor: Sorrento Day Care is the owner of the property located at 10530 SW Hall Boulevard. We are considering proposing building an approximately 4750 Sq. Ft. day care at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for necessary permits, we have arranged a time to discuss our proposal with any neighbors who may have concerns. You are invited to attend this meeting on: November 29, 2000 6:30 - 7:30 p.m. at Red Rock Creek Conference Room Please take note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. Those plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. Please call me at 503-670-7814 if you have any questions. Sincerely, George Wall P.S. Red Rock Creek Conference Room is at Tigard City Hall ( in the rear) . ///may/ O- /- _mil ! J-T `TJS 5 frorj WO.I �? _ ��S`��__S�J S—'l' eve, L,:ve_ �‘kg,K CV3 et--1 ` Q CITY of TIGARD OEOGRAPNIC INEOSMA■ION SYSTEM AREA NOTIFIED (500') _FL - ] MAPLELEAF _`r`-^ --r-11 15,358802201 1a12NB04901 — — — 1S135M01005 131759902100 111359902210 191$1Ulf1501 {6170660460D FOR: GEORGE WALL = 151359902201 I ,Eli0Be04804 �_. RE: 1S135AA,02800 32252103105 0~0 J 0 u75aalo0 E7520t01E175990 1519511104700 151359902500 < 151350802400 laune94999 L 1513588011704 = 151351102305 ta361105000 151358802304 151258801102 ,5,301199000 31358803107 / -- j OAK Property owner information 151358893102 / SUBJECT SITS is valid for 3 months from the date printed on this map.y OAK1E175990te01 31359902900 151359903001 1313BBC97100 11$1359902600 31358892700 `�\\ 131NICItON \\\'`\1�0 :u58804406 1513sYasoo tragi 01209 • 1 11135001200 EU5U0350 3US9904f00 31301COU61 1EA599ei600 131759903200 n1313SSC013911St36sCn400 151i518si409 t3135280it01131i59907t00 1313nCS13N PINE ST PINE E I 1851351NB%S I 1313506•00 1301n1130 1313520061N 317nCiSte N 1B17NCU4oe g13610612N isMin A00 181351000405 131751n0s00 13un9n 0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet 13u5AnN61 1"=199 feet 131301N5M6 nab,r • immune miB,wltn xns91eiN6 usss.5S a it ssscsI9ee • .4111h‘ PI as ...4!,,Iii.), City of Tigard n Infonnetion on this map is for general location only and SPRUCE ST �' _ SPRUCE should be verified with the Development Services Division. . .N\ 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, 03)63 97223 (503)6394171 htlpi(www.d.tigard.or.us Plot date:Oct 6,2000;C:\magiCWIAGIC03.A'R Community Development • +1 S 135AA-02304 1 S 136BC-01301 ALLEN MARILYN L CRANER ELIZABETH HARRIS& 8525 SW OAK ST CRANER RORY LEE TIGARD,OR 97223 8405 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S 136BC-01900 1 S 135AA-03702 ALZNER ROBERT J/SALLY LEA CULLINAN RANDY J AND 10730 SW 85TH AVE KRISTINA G PORTLAND,OR 97223 8775 SW OAK STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00100 1 S 135AD-01200 BAERTLEIN GEORGE&R KAY DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 9400 SW OAK ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35AD-00301 1 S 135AD-03400 BELFANTI PETER J DAVIS GENE L 8612 SW PINE ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00901 1 S 135AA-03201 BENNETT PATRICE D DAVIS MICHAEL A AND 10675 SW HALL BLVD LAURI L TIGARD,OR 97223 8535 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02400 1 S 135AA-03704 CAIN JAMES L DE MOULIN STEVE& 17350 SW SCHOLLS SHERWOOD RD LINN MARGARET SHERWOOD,OR 97140 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-03701 1 S 135AA-03700 CHRISTENSEN JACK L AND NANCY S DEMOULIN STEVE& 8805 SW OAK ST LINN MARGARET TIGARD,OR 97223 10455 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 1368 B-04800 1 S 135M-90000 CICCHETTI SHIRLEY&JAMES A DEOMR ••NDOMINIUMS 11277 SW CAPITAL HWY OWNE OF UNITS PORTLAND,OR 97219 , 0 1S136B -04900 1S135AA-02801 CICCHE I HIRLEY&JAMES A EMMERT TERRY W 11277 S PITOL HWY 11811 SE HWY 212 PORTL D,OR 97219 CLACKAMAS,OR 97015 1S1 3688-04602 1 S135AD-00200 CLANCY JERRY N& FARANCE MARGARET D TR BOHRER CHRISTINE M 1222 SW MAPLE CREST DR 10326 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 1368 C-01302 1 S 135AD-00400 FLOYD MICHAEL CHERYL S HOGREFE OWEN&MARILYN 10570 SW 85TH 13045 SW HEATHER CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 is 135AA-02305 1 S 135AA-02900 GOLDADE MICHAEL E AND JOHNSON ELIZABETH A JANE A 8520 SW OAK ST 8515 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02300 1S 135AD-00900 GOLDADE MICHAEL ELDON JUVE ALICE SARAH 8515 SW OAK 10655 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01400 1 S 135AA-04300 GUSTAFSON RICHARD M AND KINDRICK ALFRED R BARBARA K HATTIE M 8323 SW PINE 10565 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02202 1S 135AA-03200 HARDING ROBERT B KINDRICK ALFRED R/HATTIE M 4130 SW ALICE 10565 SW 85TH PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02700 1 S 136BC-01300 HARRIS ENTERPRISES INC KOCH PATRICK L GRACIA K 11640 N LOMBARD 8475 SW PINE PORTLAND,OR 97203 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136B B-04700 1 S 136BC-01000 HENSLEIGH JAY E KUHN JACK H&PAULINE S 10410 SW 85TH 2315 19TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 1S 135AD-05400 1 S 135AA-02201 HERMANN HEIDI J M LANDER GENE C TR& 10780 SW SITKA CT LANDER SHARON R TR TIGARD,OR 97223 10375 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S 135AA-04500 1S 135AA-02302 HICKS GRANT F/LINDA M LEE CARL M 10525 SW 85TH AVE 8505 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-03500 1S 135AA-02500 HILL RONALD A LYON DONALD J HAZEL J 10550 SW HALL BLVD 10440 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 +1 S 135AD-05300 1 S135M-02200 MANDELL ANNA M TR POLLOCK DONLAD E 10775 SW SITKA CT 1834 SW 58TH#202 PORTLAND,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 1 S 135AD-05200 1 S 135AA-02100 MAR PAUL POLL* K P•NLAD E 10735 SW SITKA CT 1834 S ' 8TH#202 TIGARD,OR 97223 POR, ,ND, •R 97201 1 S 135M-02303 1 S 135M-03000 MARKELL KIMBERLY D RAINS KENNETH W&LEIGH ANN 10405 SW 85TH AVE 16258 SW JESSE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 1 S 136BC-03300 1 S 136B B-04604 MELBY GARY P AND DOROTHY A RICHARDSON MARION R 8400 SW PINE ST CLARA M TIGARD,OR 97223 10380 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-03400 1 S 135AA-03705 M Y RY P AND DOROTHY A ROMERO MERCEDES G AND 8400 PINE ST MOLINA MARTHA A TIGMD, 97223 10385 SW 87TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-03600 1 S 135AA-03400 ME BY G Y P AND DOROTHY A ROSE DOREEN C 8400 PINE ST 10580 SW HALL BLVD TIG D, 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135AD-01100 1S135AD-05600 MOON BRETT A&SHERRIE A RUST KEITH A 8807 SW SPRUCE 10730 SW SITKA CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-05500 1 S 135AD-00700 O'FRIEL MICHAEL JOSEPH& SKINNER BRYAN K& ASHLEY REBECCA MELISSA B 10760 SW SITKA CT 10725 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S135AA-02600 1513688-05000 PETERSON THEODORE S AND SMITH JEFFREY WILLIAM DEAN VIRGINIA J 8319 SW OAK ST 8686 SW OAK TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-90001 1 S 135AA-02000 PETTY JOHN A STAATS SANDRA LYNN 10301 SW 87TH AVE PO BOX 20007 TIGARD,OR 97223 KEIZER,OR 97307 1 S 135AD-00800 1 S 135AA-03600 STORMONT PATRICIA JO WRIGHT JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILENE 10685 SW 85TH AVENUE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BC-01200 THORNE MARTIN DALE ET AL Go WILLIAMS GREG 12001 SW 29TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 136BC-03500 TIDYMAN JOAN S 10690 SW 85TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136B B-04600 TORKKO DAVID A 8390 SW MAPLELEAF ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-0 00 T NT ERRACE OWNERS OF LOTS 1-6 1 S 135AA-03300 URCIEL GILBERT 8609 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S136BC-01100 VANCIL KENNETH M 8418 SW OAK PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AD-00300 WALKER DOUGLAS B AND ROSEMARIE G 6880 SW 68TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 135AA-02800 WALL GEORGE&PAMELA J 11620 SW BULL MT RD TIGARD,OR 97224 1S135AA-04400 WOLFF TERRY LEE&LISA KAY 10545 SW 85TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 Naomi Gallucci CITY OF TIGARD 11285 SW 78th Avenue EAST CIT SUBCOMMITTEE Tigard, OR 97223 is\curpin\setup\labels\CIT East.doc UPDATED: 29-Sept-00 Sue Rorman 11250 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Snyder 11100 SW 82nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11043 SW Summerfield Drive, Apt. 3 Tigard, OR 97224-3376 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Jim Petersen 10815 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Dieter Jacobs 7775 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Alexander Craghead 12205 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 ' ' A 4 kii File Number � mocuae~eraoeAo*n«v of Wash momn�mn� Unified Sewerage Agency Service Provider Letter Jurisdiction Tigard Date May 31, 2001 Map & Tax Lot 1S135AA2800 Owner George Wall Site Address 10530 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Contact Shawn Eisner, PHS Proposed Activity Daycare Facility Address 9450 SW Commerce Circle #180 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Phone 503-570-0800 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with the Agency Design and Construction Standards (R&O 007). | YES ! NO || YES NO � Natural Resources - Alternatives Analysis | -- ��q � / �-� F�� Assessment(NRA) L/\| | Required | | L�� Submitted ' ` / (Section ^-� | �-� / Agency Site Visit p�� Tier 1 Alternatives Analysis F--1 �-1 Date: 5/4/01 k��J ' | �_� / / Concur with NRA/u Z r-� F-� ' �� llmr2/4�m�iveoAnak�im | | | | submitted information ~--� ! ^--~ ^--^ �___ Sensitive Area Present p�� AQmncyConcurw�h �-7 F-� On-Site �"� | Alternatives Analysis | | | | _ _- Sensitive Area Present �� Vegetated Corridor F�� --| Off-Site �°� | Mitigation Required i/�| | | _ __-__-- / ._� �-� �_~ | Vegetated Corridor p�� q ' �-1 P�entOn'8i� i� . On-Site |� | | _ Width ofVegetated �-1 F-� | 25 Feet | Off-Site Mitigation | | | | Corridor(feet) �-� �-� Condition of Vegetated Degraded Corridor ��q . Planting Plan Lp� • Enhancement Required Z E'----'''--''-- Vegetated Corridor |1 p��q| N� Required Type d Sq Footage Building-/'parking- | t Agency' C with RS/ r. [ -1 / of E 00 sf ! Equivalent -- r Allowed Use �� ~~ Conditions Attached �°� � � | (Section 3.O2�� ~--~ ^ \ ----- . ' Page 1 of 4 File 7 Number 7 - This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. In order to comply with water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: XNo structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.3 (1), (2), or (3). FlNo structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the vegetated corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed by Section 3.02.4 (a through h). The vegetated corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. FlPrior to any site clearing, grading or construction the vegetated corridor shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the vegetated corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by Section 3.0.4.a and per approved plans. The applicant shall provide the Agency with concurrence of wetland boundaries from DSL and/or USACE prior to conducting any land disturbance. Prior to any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide the Agency with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. Should a permit be issued for impact to the sensitive area, the applicant shall submit copies of annual DSL and/or USACE required mitigation monitoring reports. Page 2 of 4 File Number 14 /5 An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non federal lands within the State of Oregon. For vegetated corridors 50 feet wide or greater, the first 50 feet closest to the sensitive area shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.6, Table 3.2. XFor vegetated corridors less than 50 feet wide, the entire vegetated corridor shall be equal to or better than a "good" corridor condition as defined in Section 3.02.6, Table 3.2. For vegetated corridors that extend 35 feet from the top of a ravine, the width of vegetated corridor may be reduced to 15 feet wide if a stamped geotechnical report confirms that slope stability can be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of the ravine. �'j Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be conducted either concurrent with or prior to development of the site. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Appendix E: Landscape Requirements (R&0 007: Appendix E). Prior to installation of plant materials, all non-native and invasive vegetation within the vegetated corridor shall be removed. During removal of non-native and invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native trees and shrub species. Enhancement/restoration of the vegetated corridor shall be provided in accordance with the attached planting plan. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the application shall provide the Agency with the required vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Protection of the vegetated corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation of fencing between the development and the outer limits of the vegetated corridors. XMaintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with Section 2.11.2 of R&O 007. Performance assurances for the vegetated corridor shall comply with Section 2.06.2, Table 2-1.4. Page 3 of 4 File Number G7yS— xAppropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) for Erosion Control, in accordance with USA's Erosion Control Technical Guidance Manual shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. XPrior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the Agency or its designee is required pursuant Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. For any developments, which create multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, the Agency shall require that the vegetated corridor and the sensitive area be contained in a separate tract. X The applicant shall notify the Agency within 72 hours following completion of the vegetated corridor enhancement/restoration activities. 7 Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the extent practicable. XiFinal construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the vegetated corridor (indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. Plans shall include a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, dates (at least twice yearly) and responsible party contact information. Removal of invasive non-native species by hand is required in all vegetated corridors rated "good". Replanting is required in any cleared areas larger than 25 square feet. X Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by the Agency, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. Please call (503) 846-3613 with any questions. ihz(it( ' Heidi Berg Site Assessment Coordinator Enc. Page 4 of 4 o Approximate location of ............................................................................................� vegetated corridor boundary •............................ . Approximate location of wetland boundary LEGEND `..__ ..' I I Potentially Jurisdictional wetland ��- ® Area of impacted buffer 10 Sample point ra 76 SF 24 SF ■"\\\\o�■•X\" • Approximate wetland boundary - Approximate vegetated corridor - 1 1I • o p O I 1` a . % 1 3 o i 4J f . a^^iiii//////iiiiiiiiiii//7/Z/////////////� . . , ,, , • . • J !(Alit d nil' sw FIGURE /e+ Approximate location of potentially jurisdictional wetlands, sample point, and vegetated corridor boundary for the proposed development property at 10530 SW Hall Blvd. in Tigard, Oregon (base map provided by Symons Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2001). 'I f. 1 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. ■ APproxlmntp location of j':::::::::::............ :::•.::':::::::.:::-::::::•::'::'::'::-::': :':'::::::::•::':::'::':'regeldfed.corridor -tiairiddrY:.:� LEGEND I 1 Potentially Jurisdictional wetland '. .:'.'.'.'.'.'::.':.:'.:':.'::.':.':.':.':.':.':.':.'.:':::.':.'.7:::.7.7L':.'.::'.:'L':.:::':.-:.'.'.'.:....i ® Buffer plantings ::::.'.'.'::.:::::::.'..'::..:':....................:.:..::.yam ... ; r Approximate wetland boundary �::::. ::::.:::::.::::::-----:-- ::':-:''-.' Proposed vegetated corridor Ap roximate location of wetland boundary BUFFER PLANTINGS ......•.. �\: - \\\\\\\\\\\ \ - —-_ Botanical Name Common Name BE O,�NM, 1 - \ �•� ■\\� v TREES , Acer maaophyilum bigleal maple 243r 3 :1 Prunus emarginata bitter cherry 2418' 4 -- - j I • / SHRUBS - C � Amelanclner alnidolia western serviceberry 1&24' 7 - - I I •Mahon aquifolrum tall Oregon grape 1&24' 12 - - . .. / I Ribes sangurneum red flowering currant 18,21' 6 _ Symphoncarpos ethos snowbeny 18.21' 10 < /• • Q . . • , . . MOO'I f ,., --4 ,� /• , ,.... . : „........„....................,........„,,„...,..,,,...„.„...,.„.„ ,.. , . . , . ..M C SCALE IN Farr 2430 FIGURE Proposed on-site vegetated corridor boundary and buffer planting plan for the proposed development property at 10530 SW Hall Blvd. in Tigard, Oregon s/2/o1 ^ (base map provided by Symons Engineering Consultants, Inc., 2001) 2) Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • • • Department of Transportation ,�� _��, District 02A Maintenance Office A 5440 SW Westgate Drive Suite 350 '4%.141-1,1W r Portland OR 97221 '` JthnA Kib1}al Q,MD.,Go nrx Phone: (503)229-5002 iatia Fax: (503)297-6058 Email:Melissa.J.Fricke@odot.state.or.us George Wall Sorrento Day Care, Inc. 12650 SW Brockman Rd 11620 SW Bull Mt Rd Tigard, OR 97225 05/08/2001 Subject: Approval of Application for State Highway Approach and Transmittal of Preliminary Construction Permit Application Number 1395 for an Approach on Highway Number 141, (Beaverton-Tualatin), at Milepoint 4.3. Your Application for State Highway Approach has been approved. You have completed the first step in a 3-step approach permitting process: You are now ready to begin step 2 with submittal of Construction Drawings and Plans. Because your specific approach request fits one of the standard designs available in ODOT's Highway Design Manual and Standard Drawings, ODOT is able to provide construction drawings for you. A Preliminary Construction Permit is attached. This includes the Construction Drawing and all necessary terms and conditions of the Permit. If the terms and conditions are acceptable, please sign the Preliminary Construction Permit and return it, with proof of liability insurance (see attached requirements) and (either...a bond in the amount of $2,000.00 OR a deposit in lieu of bond in the amount of $2,000.00), to the following address: Edward Miller District 02A Maintenance Office 5440 SW Westgate Drive Suite 350 Portland OR 97221 NOTE: The signed Preliminary Construction Permit must reach the above address by no later than 5:00 PM on (Date: June 15, 2001). If the Department has not received the signed copy by this date, the approval shall be considered expired. Once ODOT receives the signed Preliminary Construction Permit, a final valid Construction Permit will be issued. The issue date of the Construction Permit is the date ODOT signs it. No Construction Permit is valid until a copy, approved and signed by ODOT has been furnished to the applicant. No work on highway right of way is to be started until the applicant obtains a valid Construction Permit. NOTE: THE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS NOT PERMISSION TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF YOUR APPROACH(ES). If you have any questions regarding the Preliminary Construction Permit, please contact me at (503)229-5002. I welcome the opportunity to assist you. Sincerely, Edward Miller District 02A Permit Specialist Attachments (Preliminary Construction Permit and Insurance Requirements) 9posoJ//I&rróVe NARRATIVE DATE 1/24/01 SITE 10530 SW HALL BLVD. APPLICANT GEORGE WALL 11600 SW BULL MT. ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 RE PRE-APP DATED 8/1/00 George Wall Construction proposes building a 5035 sq. ft. day care at 10530 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard. The building, parking, play yard, landscaping and utility accesses are shown on accompanying plans. Roughly, the building will cover 30% of the site, the parking lot 30%, the landscaping 17.75%, playgroundl6%, and miscellaneous 6.25%. The building will be wood construction, truss roof and concrete slab. The existing duplex on the property will be razed. Access will be 24 feet wide per agreement with ODOT and City of Tigard. The approach starts 6 feet from the southwest property corner. A 6- foot wide sidewalk will be placed between the curb and planter strip. No part of the property is in the flood plain. Flood plain elevation is below 170 feet and per attached topog, the property, at its lowest point, is 171 feet. A water quality filtering pond will be avoided by using a"paver" parking lot and increasing the impervious surface by less than an additional 5000 sq. ft. (By USA standards for defining and recognizing previously existing impervious surfaces, a duplex is given arbitrary credit for 5280 sq. ft. of existing impervious surface which is subtracted from new impervious surface calculated for water quality standards). Water quantity will be handled by detention under the parking lot. Drainage will be to Ash Creek via storm drains in Hall Boulevard. A new 1 inch water meter will replace the existing meters. A 4 inch sewer line will connect to the sewer mainline in Hall Boulevard. Handicap parking and access per attached plans. There will be 13 parking slots with 6 compact and 7 standard sized spaces. Landscaping will meet or exceed buffering and screening standards and will be planted per landscape plans attached. One existing tree, a 34 inch oak, will be removed only if determined a hazard by an arborist. Street and utility standards will be met with design plan engineered by Symons Engineering, Inc. TARGETED CODE CHAPTERS The pre-app conference notes specifically request the following code chapters be addressed. 18.360 Site Development Review The thrust of this chapter is to promote "health, safety and welfare, convenience, comfort and prosperity." A change in usage from duplex to day care will increase parking, traffic and building size. That said, anyone who has seen the duplex would agree the change is an improvement. Compliance to the dictates of this chapter can be found in the plans, narrative and impact statement. 18.390 Decision-Making Procedures/Impact Statement Applicant is in compliance with the conditions of a Type II application. No variance, conditional use or modification is requested. An impact study is attached. 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts The subject property is zoned C-P and day care is a permitted use. 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation The requirements of this chapter are discussed in the narrative and impact sections attached. ODOT requests an easement for combined access with the abutting property to the south should they request access directly onto Hall. The easement will read that at such time as a combined access is required, it will be located 50-50 along the property line of the two properties. Cost of moving the access will fall to the adjoining property and the access will be limited to those two properties and any pass-through from any other property will be disallowed. 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards This is dealt with in the impact statement. 18,745 Landscaping and Screening Standards Meeting the conditions of this chapter are on plans. Landscape narrative is attached. 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste Minimum standard method is used requiring 20 sq. ft. of storage area. 18.765 Off Street Parking/Loading Requirements There will be 13 parking spaces which are within this chapter's parameters. 18.790 Tree Removal Tree removal is discussed in the narrative. 18.795 Visual Clearance Area Conditions are met. 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standard Pertinent requirements of this chapter are discussed in the narrative and impact statements. The engineered plans will size construction installation to code. EASEMENT TO TITLE: Future sharing of access. LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE All landscape plants will observe accepted planting procedures, use size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock and meet the provisions of chapter 18.745 of the Tigard Municipal Code. Within the confines of the above provisions, we expect the landscaping to be aesthetically pleasing, have a clean, balanced look and follow an orderly pattern. The goal is to provide to potential parents an inviting environment that suggests the clean, balanced look of the exterior is matched by what goes on in the interior. At sometime in the past the back of this property was leveled creating somewhat of an embankment to the rear. This area will require some manor stone wall installation. The walls are shown on the landscape plan. To arrive at what the required landscape would be, Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 were used. The proposed use is "cp"and the abutting use is detached single. This zone difference exists both on the south side and rear of the property. Table 18.745.1 indicates plantings and buffers must conform to the "D" section of Table 18.745.2. Option 2 of Section"D" provides for a 15 foot buffer, trees no less than 10 feet nor more than 20 feet apart, a six foot fence, and shrubs which in density meet the provisions of 18.745.5 B.4.b The drafted landscape plan meets those provisions. The property to the north has the same zoning as the subject property, so no buffer or landscape is required in Tigard code. However, USA claims the property to the north has wetlands close enough to require buffer mitigation. To meet the requirements for mitigation plantings along the north property boundary will follow the guidelines of the USA services provider letter attachment figure #2. Adjustment: ODOT owns Hall Boulevard and consequently controls access of the day care onto the right of way. It was their demand that the access abut the property to the south. For code as well as aesthetic reasons, Tigard was able to work a compromise of the access being 6 foot away from that south property line. The matrix provides for a 6 foot wall for a 6 foot buffer. ("C" section; proposed use parking to existing abutting use single family) However, a 6 foot wall violates sight distance. In lieu of a 6 foot wall, closely spaced rhododendrons and trees are planned for buffering and screening the parking/driveway area. T i��s m � CITY of TIGARD ~ �' �'',a� r'M +�` r y } M K M <4 . GEOGRAPHIC iR iORMATION SYSTEM 6 � ,,,. a-' . i : # ' V BLVD rt si . y {.-kr y ,� yam r�y�. �, r}. �. •:•7M'- '. " 1•444.' a.. 1.li li.(;.� T - �_ r T a •� , " t sV:! r .om.�E._. % ': � A �4, s i*e�.' r 'ft : ip t 14 4 t- 1 : rT It r . a� x * -4 a PIF .1 - - i a- . d •I 9f t+° i ti k� -tom "f► r r°s .7.740/1644 a^ IriLltr i •. .r '✓ yp r {, P T `.tl ,�`.MC.^]• ' „, tr tAiIJ�C. a T' ' •NL y N ,tom E 1 -f �r '� .► . a s 1,,,*-4- '�r '' -'' r, a • ... 1. s #' 2 r ,.{' 4 ;gilt,. i't.,v *.a. • P�' t �.�' P" � '.. f r. b 7 :- . 0 25 50 75 100 125 Feet ,y u yf „g,1. ' �� '� .a H fy061kei ,, ' i:::: 1 E�. r. 1. ,, , Ailiti _ . 3"�". ..r , ,, v, 4� .?` r' r•w City ofTi rd .0 mss" ., 1 "�`. A :."r :'. M"'.�" • ` "1 ' ''�, a . " Information on this map Is for general locaven only and t y' 1i h4 R ' fin,,,"•• .� d" ` should be venfied with the Development Services Division mar�. _ ,� _ "� 137255W Hall Blvd en- ' Fr A r p•_`r1 F.1' `' a+° ^�i L.0 I t- jai.. .r'.. 4, dam: Tigard.OR 87223 y ,�, .�..rf (1303)6114171 hiplivameilmdavn Community Development Plot date:May 1,2001; CO3.14PR SANITARY SEVER 1691101.E CATCH BASN • 2 4TT6 16p.407- -----.p S LP ELEVATION 16694 B e J FLOW 1.6E ISMS J'J•CONCRETE SAN?ARV SEWER LINE FACE OF LW CONCRETE WATER CURD WORN LIAW Y r OAK STREET 20 20 40 I� BAi VALVE ,WATER I `�"� I{{{{{{SCALE I { I yy�N I� PBE 6ETEB 0w GRAPHIC SCALE-FEET I o.I Q.lVATED POLE WATER • TRAFFIC WIN.STANDARD HELVE • CONCRETE PAD G • TRAffM JAWAL VALET SEANCE P , JT�Sr. I �\ TRAFFIC MONK LOCKER .. f1iE�L G7171 RAM I t�a� LP 6EVATRIN 10417' CONTROL,a I I $�.L CONTROL VA1A.T V 11 I R per' 5' E1EINIWNI 1BSBV I i' _ !I' 1 I 1 - ITAAFFID " 1 LOT 1 I y IJ•,REE LOT 2 i s Ge•ssas•E r9a, 0 s1 .._..\) ■ CATCH DAMN • RBI ELEVATION 104:1` 1J?c /r I f I G / 8 ii 1 BI I = W c., `J I • F �v w METER r ww..o Q P ��; fjf Z I 1--":,r 1 CTS COVERED I G y GO �/ WATER SIGNAL: � AIEIER SCALE: !' - 20'Al /R. IVnrna , VALET MUM „■ I•GAS SEA LINE 1 ♦ =--IT In1T41'�-- 1 &WTARY SEVER 166435 =u.=�__ ------ _ �{} wi EuwnoN1 L7QA7' ' J� n k N 88.36'4 '90 3 /• " E�aItP ILOV LSE 161.4 u ,.p n u I ' p ...NI?! i' �I 0( 3 1. PRIbE AY ' ,Tel III • d `iiYiBrliT �iL� i I �' 6-{ LOT 6 MKS 1 IA* 'OVER►IXE` b ' I 1 E LOT 5 p I �, CATER BASN e. LW£11741ON 171.4' PROJECT: qb'�----o ` _. - SITE PLAN AND TOPOGRAPHY 1 � �OF N07ES: LOCATION: CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE EVERY FOOL NE 1'4 OF SECTION 35, T.IS.,R.1 W., W.M. 130' I 30' DIE L N A T A EAror 1s NOSED O N COUNTY BENaDPRx Na 36 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON J R/6CH NAT AN ELEVATION Of 100.70' GAS LINE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON oN-BETE PAINT SPOTS AND NORTIAIEBT NATURAL GAS NAPS. - CLIENT: DATE: NOVEMBER 2,2000 I WATER LNE LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON TIED WATER WEVES AND MAPS PROVIDED By DAN$YMONS SCALE I• • 20' TTMLAiw VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. 108 NUMBER; 00-2699 LOVE LAND SURVEYS,INC. P.O.BOX 607 OLADSTOErI,OR 07037 (303}966-4913 wft 1, S.W. HALL BOULEVARD __-J / �/." is I- 1. --- ---__ p��°°sp• a+ °° ---- —T �= .°� `'� I 003\. �— _ 0 �\'')— _3 ▪n aammo °i rh� \\\ !:1;1,* ` o • • x R�t I,�I 1, 4l ` n I I I , I ' n . i„,„,,,,,,,[ I — , , i 85 , ,. , 11 '', o a IQ 1 ,, , , II I ,_,, , , it r.li\ t \ P II I `\ YI t I l i \\ \ `\ \ - La I1 lI1 ?'r \ i, ' tt t 1 I \\\ b t\\ \ f/ /'� ICI \ \ • t 1 `�• 1 II \ 1 • I \\ •\ \\ \ "3 ------ _..) \‘,..\\‘•,-..s. rx, :s',._:.;/:<,:::./S11:::::-----31.—itt\..\:1;":,::±1:::::::...:*\;\ ii;::::......__----....--:-..- ._____._ r 8 — 8\. 8 f 11111 I \ E \` it i \\ 4I to I I —.q ! ; 1 I >>»>>zi g gi m v., c) ; ,.,„ _ ou, 1 $1 � yr $ rlI I §§RS Dm r 8 z $ ....1 A ZZ c—) LH I I I � ' I 1 I SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS.INC. 1 8 I I I CONE INSTALL C e'L.L WO r-A-7M ]'I ROW CONTROL/C I i T �E(COOOr PF 001 CIIISMC u E cd RO I I 12805 ee.footer road n Portland, crepon 97238 i I I I T r ONE • — - — — — — — .r •''r — — — --- - — phone 503 7601353 gE RI I i I '! %//////////////////////////////////////% fecekMe 503 7621982 i I I I ; / i I I B Aram uror / / 4 I I L I Sw w/S'LCA0 I I I I I ]R.,se o / / II �I ‘II I u� III I — a / I 1 0 / m I ' I I i % CLIENT I I I - �' I p / • I / ///'7' I OEOF10E WALL ' I i I I i I ' / / I 11620 8W BULL MIT.ROAD I I I I I /AVRIC INM°ISOr 0>" / / T10ARD,OR 97224 I = r i I MOWS GAS / I I o e L nrw ror Mwp % / 503-870-7614 I Nss--1— l s n /G•—— 'I � ��1 cn Eft % PROJECT n >II I� ,.• II RNOMOE�LR/TO g � I GEORGE I I I�vfAAOF Ek$nri0 MI , I I I 410YMAlfO WI f < / // 1 I wAmr uE7 As I Lxair POLE" %,,//////////!///////////////////////////! I I I ro SPADE a.sr� I I I I ST I n / �( n ss WALL CAP MO Ae.wow COORDINATE oowLSrour rrts I I I i U • Cmnwc OAS LP. _, I A0 r,� em ARLTE DOWIS UT IT DAYCARE ' I ° 1 I .:II I --O • S TE ADDRESS I I 111 ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10534 SW HALL BLVD. - — TIGARD.OR 97225 I —J.—I SKOL VAi"0'"'sartTOO GRADE r EEf NAME KM $i i Arzo co.,co.0 I I I I I PRELJMINARY sv.L Av.,Rost UTILITY C-.16.3 • I PLAN 1 I I I I.. ----- - I F1EV90N I I I I I I I I A .ns/Oi SUED ION NIL DIVOT RS NC. 1 I m RN.,tl.b lo ' I •I LC..rrtrr M PPEI VYII UTILITY ILII r rLJV\ NORTI (/y�1�� A •LS® VIV) A SCALE I'.,O' ■ IESt1E DATE APR 25,2001 DRAWMIO FLE 2004201 PROJECT NUMBER 20042 BEET S • C3 OF 4 SEEM , R5 CONBTRUCTEN I I Ij I„' I SEC I I 0000000000a0000000 m003 I I I SYMONS E ANTS, INC. HAOMINOUS WE I AND PG AROUND ROOTS(OR UNPINS (IN 1b100DDPO""NS I nFa ICI - =Q co.AL ANNA. 12805 4.e.foster rued — - 1-- portend, orepon 97 238 phone 503 7801358 )5a0/IIIIIIIIIIl. --_--— I tale role 503 782 1982 IIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIINWIIIIIII/IIIII� / �IIII4NOWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. /� / (DJ WEN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIII. /, / 10,000010IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIIh !//, / ' IIIIIIIIIIIIII .... / i I►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII OWV4,I1010IIIIIh 3 IIIIIIIIIII■IIII/III10IIIIIIII/II/IA ► / ►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIIN / !III/ III■I/IIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIII/I6 / 8 _ ;I O IIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIIIIIIIIII.IIIiN % 3 ;` ►IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� IIII4 / prrmIIIIIII/IIIII■IIIIIIIII.. A NI. / l\\ O I . i 0 BO AO ONt /v . m CLENT -� 10IIIIII/01000II/II/II10II/IIII/III:-� / r OIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/10II/IIIIIIIIIII. ' ► , = i IIIIIIIIIIII.04~ IIIIII/IIIIIIIIo.'s.. 11620 8W WALL 11■■i01000• :: � ��`'o�` 118208WBtA122 ROAD ►IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO. '/J T10AFiD,OR 97ffi4 ►IIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIII/IIIIIIII. ~ I� - 7Bµ vi 111111/IIIeIIIII/10IIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIi'•t� I �.A� i IIIIIIIIIIIIII lir - 0000000000001,:::5 1 BAUD EXCAVATE NEAR!ESP. PRO�CT ..r... --- i ROOM MR ATE N ARR!E[xGAVAOa. • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • wr ar ROOM>r i�r-. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII \- M Jlrr.e I NOHOW'rD.rsIER swrR,rsa •:=.:'!.-.,. IIIIIIIII/I/IIIIIIIIIII/II/IIIIIII%. / :':t. t IIII/II/I/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII%%i 74 GEORGE •.. . 1011/IIIII/IIILIIIIIIIIIILIIIIII/L..:. 1� WALL •>•: -..."''IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� •;I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi ulw CV NCH`i. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/IIIIIIII;: :.111 O).r�aoomnws DAYCARE ..••111101000IIIIIIIOIIIIIIII .- Bf1E ADDRESS LIIIIILI10IIIIIII III'.,- � -1 » BLVD. — _ — —�...- — .— — - --—--— TIGARD,OR 97225 - I I SI$T MAW PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE i I PLAN REVISION Q/of R NED RR R E DEPP REUrw LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH A A LANDEC.APE PLANING LEGEND (AUra lw AnC PAna) ISSUE DATE APR 25.2001 DRAWNO FLE 20042C1 •„ n EACH a„A...o.(}NCR) 1 I/J•MP. PROJECT MASER 20042 ® 2 EACH A.N.N.01.40.(GOLD COAST JUMPER)5 CAL 81$T 4 e 30 EACH Nice...onc000..n0,Haws) S GAL. L1 LANDSCAPE DESIGN BY: GEORGE WALL CF 4 SETS NOT FOR CONS,AUC11014 I • Hi I 1 I 1 i I I I I i 1 VACANT I 1 SEC 1 ..c.:-...........0000e7000000 e I LOT 2 LOT 1 SYMONS ENGINEERING i CONSULTANTS.INC. i I 1 1 i 1 _E MOO 61, 1 '0 0. 17.00 I 12805 te foster road s 11143441.4 116.1tr —ELF_ _11..-.,..........,•■•..a,..x....1/1.10. -- porland, mom 97236 I 1 ,. •••• 1. F • orsar rove ocox4w40 —r r 0' ....-.... ...-.- -.--•— pt One 503 760 D53 facee 503 782 1962 i ! r ... —,,,,,,,, /Rs 010 011,srm„, I ....... r iii• _ 11411011 t n /":.1,1.''.- .:,IT.::"':emiszemirerdra ism, ,. . 0 1 . _, , .• p PROPOSED BUILDING j2J. 5,029 S.F. r r,, am I N / AP tip. I I . :: GEORGE WALL • /' I = 11620 9W au_mr.ROAD r'. ' I , -• ill R 11GAPE).OR 97224 ■ L KW 0:14011010 PAVIRS 14: . ' .., 503-670-7814 "4 C...•■•-_-t---) roams r.Ic1 or-..„) -. /4 2400r - . / 1 / PROJECT I 1.011017 5.1 ' ...,- / / / N .... .. GEORGE I 01/1EMON ILLUMNAMD '' I ,.../\14:.....'.;:"' 11010.410 5.1 44111100110 WALJ_ I .. . ,t .1`•,, _ ... (We IIIMI MO( I IRASPI i RAY ARO "fi DAYCARE DRYOSIM ,.- , . . . _ SITE ADDRESS .— OWING WALL (17.3.2 4107 1:40ICAI.7) 10534 SW HALL BLVD. ....=......‘.. ..„., ______. .=—__.... .__. — —.- ----_______,..„ __ , .._.._x___.\ 'TIGARD,OR 97225 r- ri eauculr 000. 74W 11'(El.LW(IS or NEW 047*10 WALL SI-EET NNE 1 E1451174 nsoevn.m.010001 1 PRELJMINAFIY I I ECM LOT 5 LOT 6 PLAN 1 , i C0511110 ReS100111.1 REVISION ,L 4/25/0. ISSUED 101 Orr 015104 REI55 i . I A L I 1 I PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN NOWT. PRO.ECT SUMMARY A (.:11) ZONING: C-P A ' WItil ROOF AREA: 5860 S.F. A SCALC l'...0' LANDSCAPE AREA.- 5189 SF 1138E DATE APR 25,2501 PAYER AREA: 4886 SF CONCRETE AREA 1095 S.F. DRAWING FILE 20042C1 TOTAL S1TE AREA: 16,830 SF I (AFFER DEDICATION) PROJECT NUMER 20042 r &EU 1 Cl• ..-• CF 4 914EETR • 11 NCIT FOR CORITRIZTER 1npocJ 541-woc IMPACT SITE 10530 SW HALL BLVD. RE PREAPP COMPLIANCE DATED 8/1/00 IMPACT APPLICANT GEORGE WALL 11600 SW BULL MT. ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 PHONE 503 670-7814 FAX 503 624-0882 TRANSPORTATION ODOT's last tally of week days traffic count sites an average of 13900 cars per day at the corner of Oak and Hall Boulevard on Hall. The proposed day care with an average of 90 babies-children total and assuming 1.5 baby/child per car, each pickup or delivery sequence would equal about 60 trips on Ilall Boulevard. Since each trip on Hall to the day care and each trip off the day care onto Hall are considered individually to be traffic activity generated by the day care, two trips occur when delivering a child and two trips when picking up. Consequently, the day care, by this formula would generate 240 cars per day. Additionally, 15 staff would generate an additional 30 trips (Not all staff are on site at the same time and staff seldom leaves the premises during the work day). Finally, school bus activity, deliveries, trash pick-up, and other services at most would add another 20 trips daily. The total would be: Baby/child activity 240 Staff 30 Miscellaneous 20 290 Adding 290 trips to 13900 existing trips on Hall would mean an approximately 2% impact on Hall Boulevard traffic. This limited impact on Hall will be mitigated by TIF and dedication of 15 feet to ROW. In 19 years in day care, we have never had a teacher ride a bike to work. On rare occasion, a child will ride a bike to the day care, but that is unlikely to occur on Hall due to the high traffic count and lack of an established bike path. DRAINAGE 5000 sq. ft. of impervious surface is allowed before water quality regulations kick in. The proposed day care has approximately 5500 sq. ft. of impervious surface. However, credit is given for previously existing impervious surfaces. The site has an existing duplex which provides the property with a pre-existing impervious surface credit of 5280 sq. ft. The parking lot will have 5049 sq. ft. of surface. Per Lee Walker, who is a supervisor at USA, water quality of parking lots can be mitigated by using pavers instead of pavement or concrete. The calculations to justify this will be provided by Symons Engineering, Inc. Water quantity standards will be met by use of a detention pond under the parking lot. Water will be drained to storm sewer in Hall Boulevard,then to nearby Ash Creek. Engineering will be provided by Symons Engineering, Inc. PARKS The closest park is 7 blocks away and may be used on rare occasions. However, no regular or concentrated use of park facilities will occur. WATER Water service available. SEWER Sewer exists in Hall Boulevard and is adequate to service the day care. NOISE No children will be outside before 7:30 a.m. or after 6:30 p.m. Outdoor time is limited to approximately 30 minutes per group two to three times daily for the four groups that have outside time-3 year olds, 4's, 5's, and after school. The day care will sit lower than adjacent residential properties. Consequently, the height difference, the fencing, landscaping and limited outside time will serve to prevent any excessive noise on adjacent properties. eoTech Pcrt SYMONS 12805 S.E.Foster Road ENGINEERING Portland,OR 97236 CONSULTANTS, Inc. (503)760-1353 FAX 762-1962 STORMWATER REPORT & CALCULATIONS for GEORGE WALL ioN�^^�s a , DAYCARE �� Tigard, OR June, 2001 1‘)c) cifr 1 NE / i wvG6,091 F� O7' OREGON ✓6, 190 E O g41 f. S\M��- RENEWS 6/30/02 1:1-174 111- .1►.1P! TABLE OF CONTENTS Stormwater Design Narrative 1-3 Vicinity Map 4 Water Quality Calculations 5-6 Pre and Post-Development Runoff Results (SBUH) 7 Runoff Curve Numbers 8 Washington County Soil Survey Data 9 Downstream Analysis Pipe Net 10 Downstream Analysis Inventory Report 11 Downstream Analysis 2, 5, 10 &25 Year Storms 12-15 Downstream Analysis Runoff Coefficients 16 Downstream Analysis Basin Map 17 Downstream Analysis Existing Pipe Layout 18 Downstream Analysis Basin Topography 19 STORMWATER DESIGN NARRATIVE Executive Summary Stormwater from this project is managed both for quality and quantity in accordance with Unified Sewerage Agency regulations. Water quality is proposed to be maintained by using best management practices for the removal of sediment and phosphorus. Sixty-five percent phosphorus removal is proposed to be accomplished with open jointed pavers over a gravel filter bed, a trapped catch basin treating parking lot paver overflow and pollution control manhole treating all runoff. Stormwater quantity control will be maintained via a progressive 2 orifice outlet control structure. Post-development runoff will be attenuated to pre-development release rates per the following: Design Pre-Development Calculated Maximum Post- Event Runoff Target Development Release Rate 2-Year Storm 0.08 cfs 0.08 cfs 5-Year Storm 0.12 cfs 0.12 cfs 10-Year Storm 0.14 cfs 0.14 cfs 25-Year Storm 0.18 cfs 0.18 cfs Actual runoff will likely be less than Pre-Development conditions for off-peak storm flows due to the storage capacity of the gravel filter under the pavers and the infiltration capacity of the underlying soil which exceeds the water quality design storm(0.36" in 4 hours) with 100% redundancy. Analysis based on SEC drawings dated April 25, 2001. Project Location This project is a redevelopment of an existing residential duplex to be demolished located at 10534 SW Hall Boulevard in Tigard, Oregon. This location saddles itself with the complication of satisfying three government agencies, Unified Sewerage Agency for design criteria, Oregon Department of Transportation for permission to connect to their drainage system, and City of Tigard for planning and final approval. Ash Creek is ultimately the receiving stream. Onsite Analysis All runoff and detention calculations for onsite analysis were performed with the King County HYD Program. 2,5,10 and 25 year storm events were analyzed and the outlet structure was designed to restrict flow to the respective pre-development release rates. 1 A five minute time of concentration was utilized for all post-development runoff conditions. Baseline flows for the existing developed conditions were not taken into consideration in the detention calculations. Infiltration through the pavers and gravel filter were also ignored in calculations and curve numbers for the pavers were modeled as gravel roads where loss of porosity is more prevalent. This should provide extra detention capacity that will,also retard or reduce overflow conditions during storm events more severe than the 25 year design event. Outlet Controls Initial outlet control is provided by the water quality orifice which is designed to maximize detention time for the removal of suspended solids. Low flows from the parking lot will not leave the site as surface water until the inflow exceeds the infiltration and volume capacity of the pavers and underlying gravel storage. Once the storage volume of the gravel is exceeded, the parking lot runoff will weep or sheet flow to the catch basin as surface water and be detained by the underground detention pipe. A 2-stage outlet control riser then takes over metering the discharge from the pollution control manhole to the public system. 100-year Storm Event The 100-year storm at its peak will exceed the elevation of the 25 year overflow riser and will discharge through the riser without overtopping the parking lot curb provided the outlet structure is free of obstruction and unfavorable tailwater conditions do not exist. Downstream Analysis The existing public drainage system that accepts discharge from this parcel was checked using a Rational analysis on the HYDRAFLOW program for 2, 5, 10, and 25 year storms (see calculations attached). Several assumptions were made to simplify the model and include treating the open ditch/driveway culvert systems that parallel both Oak and Pine streets as corrugated metal pipes (CMP having similar roughness coefficients as grassy ditches). The overall drainage basin is approximately 29.5 acres; this project site approximately 0.4 acres representing 1.32% of the total drainage basin. Modeling assumptions can easily produce errors in excess of 2% rendering the impact of this development insignificant from a drainage modeling perspective. The existing downstream system appears to be underdesigned (before or after this project develops) for storms greater than a 10 year event. The weak link is a 12" pipe (line 2) with a slight reverse slope in the right-of-way between the inlet at the southwest corner of the Hall/Oak intersection and the inlet at the northwest corner of the same intersection. It is fed by 18", 12" and 6" lines and discharges to the 18" outfall line which is also fed by an 18" line(see map 2 attached). The 12" line restriction causes surcharging of lines 2, 3, and 4 in a 2 year storm. The 18" outlet pipe at Ash Creek appears to reach its capacity at the peak of the 10 year storm, and the hydraulic grade line exceeds the ground elevation in several locations for the 25 year storm based on measured tailwater elevations. The actual tailwater elevation during lesser storms may be higher than assumed and cause hydraulic grade lines to be above the surface during the lesser storms as well. The additional runoff generated over the existing condition from the redevelopment of this parcel in minuscule compared to overall drainage basin and its inherent system inadequacies. Upgrading of the downstream conveyance system is not recommended to be a condition of approval for this project because any fix would not pass the test of proportionality. Water Quality A gravel filter is proposed to treat all parking lot runoff through the infiltration process. Heavier parking lot flows will pass through a trapped catch basin and then be detained in a pollution control manhole that has been oversized to accommodate a detention pipe. All runoff will flow through the pollution control manhole which shall be fitted with debris collar on the overflow. This will greatly minimize the release of floating debris during the overflow condition. Previously mentioned features further reduce/retard low flow runoff, increase infiltration potential, and increase detention time resulting in enhanced suspended solids removal. Standard erosion control practices will be utilized to prevent sediment from leaving the site during construction. Any pumping for the purpose of construction dewatering shall be discharged to a filter bag. 3 17 :!,:,A r or .\.74,'$p„bre.t 1-i■I\ibk NNI,,,....17k;;e:09. :z1. \‘-. EMI4:_/:/:)rigirrA e.i it....14,I".. .. ,'.-,:l 4,41 , :40 i', \ 1.,„\ Ikk:411 li ts,,,, ,....- -. ..._ ___ i Jfry' i t` may"'._ tp ,' 0 1 We Z., 1 �.'N :f f 1 �t f•.\d-i''-'-'d-.'ra...:-.-...._..-11--..-%,:...,a- I/ , � 1 ++, : :i fix, ,Ms..— ___, 1L , , �� , _'� ~Iw. i1 7,, 2. . .k .44- ----A.:1--.; i iir.i '$) 1.st,uwi - . , ..).... 4., :it•7::N'711kir-.7.....„ ,%,')QC':■1/4‘.f-4,4 ' 1 Il■`1) Ak '1/4 N.- s\ 1°71 el 1 a fr-1 —'—'1 ;:,„ ,v.-. \ok: ... i .k c;\\, ,-, '''\, :\\ -dal f , .-td '°, ' ?�. 4 Irecs 11 \i _ \ \`may . ,s. gi 1 i r;, ". i.V_YL2r.6:_„!‘f,:v...7,734‘...'.::1._,.1..-'11 'N'cr,t. ..a.,,..:At....slevilli 1: 1.. A,',,n...., ,,.\\,,,...., ., ,,___0_,„__ ,_____v_ --. - IR r+ht? \ : .t_ :tip„ .: r did \\4__51 �- —y r . CIS r� �'!.1;;i 7i, ` 1.�y s .t 10 ''4 ! �r•. _- a •1./ i j < Pr,. rirwwx.ruwjYrw.....� ��- 11 t ,r � v i m .-1 .` l`, N•. ■ ,r... f -11.1121 111.1wrjwir411,,,4:..":"-- !:"7: .•-• •', - IVI ,. '.., ------,, -, eiii WOW ..v.itA 1. .4 tivolv,ag : ..: 1411 ' 1 .i.t, ,,,,vnim,„4--. .............; . _..... t I? /gib' 11111,Ativ144,`-; riv4... illiv.‘ ,,,i-.10..-,117:-. 1:—:--- --- ...:,2)-Al •‘. . -41.....t.•_...':,- - 9,2 fer iir rit-97'i il''''.,.a.,;'101.1711,1 11;41 '14W:*ailia ...„,„,q.4- 4 Nis t V rIf, . ,k:to.-, A --mpkw,-;:.4. orb. !. .:9 ;b 11M26,6 1 ai...'4"../0 i V if • ..y., --\— ' N N 7 � i MP, 1 MiUtIt_e _twz.: . Let, '..L. --t _4•-•,-.. • •" _ . • •:- 2 4 Il .14 \ .�!!! f �w a.. .. [ i, ; i AI a t! '* `y�� iL � ylf•Ei!.. �• a1` x �. . 1 ` .. 1+, S •• 4 � . ` Mils;.441;( #, 6�1� ;bin , '4 r : ikl• - .• •• 'WY�Sie �yy,,.��1.�V...�?'!Or.1�ril�i1�5 .� L.� ��c.�y,�+� _ - _ �_ \v.,.......--ora en• p !ct tk t l7 _� 7 II --'... 4.1 \ ei g il ,,,.....fe 7 it T� +ti."e � �w' 5'i F k • r. g ' ;w'�p4 >gF+t•e r ; ir� •• • . •+r.` s _' • ■ tl�ir lr►� a Le kiyiii 1 1 4 4 alepl.yr 4.4 v - - J)el .--,.• • c,...;,i. .- -, - - \ — . 1 Mir e 414,ra k t..W.IrA 01.'''ft.k;44,1 1 0.,,,.. . t,•- ,,5 ‘4 _, .._ _ k ___). , d,,:•..Az , .i,,,r. ..;,!,.x.;.: .-_-„,:i?..,0.4,1. 09 r_ ., zipwc,... _. 1 -:, -Ne ' ifg'"eiY il.•.rit,;.4k $ 4,,, -441c. ,... , 11) t`Lriass p NI i „. A f i rgig#r -N--.1/4-itesilrihttalk.-- ,41:;.:014F.AN rooll --a—. —..,,,, , I. . EN— u--viliti 10.--iNtgak 11. - mi. 1 Ti4 ,,,/ / / • • • In ,..... ilk a • . greAr aii , - liP°11104 * -44i, qi ep 1. 1,-,. , . troria Or a a —11 . -\%il:, qiilL dtak - -. . 1r , Ca/ 6 .1 %'' ''s alik a , 0 - Al r , •i..., .r_ .: _ i . .t. ip;41„,..,eset 1 3.1.15* . . - . SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc. PROJECT �-Y- -z P"-y G Z PAGE l/ 3 L/5/9 /'re-4'UtA7 'o ) 91 IPI c�fl'�7cj,L� 70 0,.P. 0T JOB NO. ZOO IL p/ehmiA-C�.� Y Y Q C.* c s BY �r DATE ¢/.Z S loi /4-x-g4 S11/1l-1- Y /yLv. ,e = .x$60 Sp (o. I3S/9c) //siC_uoib+6' 01 194N5.. Gonl ..5"/, .6- -i.l< = o sF ( o. 02c /pc) 1/ges ii' ir,cXin1 y Lo T = 4 68 I- s ( O./O 7 /1-6) L ,q-c)P..i '?Pg = s/S 9 .s ( O. /19 ,4 ) 10. e °7 � Tflz = `6. Sao ( O. 3S 6 At-r,) 4 /C- 7?oiv Giza/r / ao ‘X/ ,ay .cc e-i1 4 el DTs Z x ,2 L #o sf = S2 8(2 Q vim-,ry D,cs74 -s-717 der) a 16 ., ez orP iAI 1' ,vzs o/s) s ,c--).p&--v4-4,4- Uy0V = 0. 36 x ( /09S t 4,G 84 ) = I73 GA" /z A /� \/0 /73 /j -oo = 0. 0/z cPs OA- 0. 3 6.4 751-11 s = o, 09 i PO IL O vs 8i4m .5-'7 ,c 4-4-E I/O L 1//'9 UAIJEie P:!?/gA's yO)Of 4 G 9 G >. /' >c Z 0 70 /2 = *60 cr > /73 DA' KEl7UNo4k, v ,/ C7U) 7 7 177 SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc. PROJECT PAGE Z/l . JOB NO. BY DATE T1 - Ca19T' . so/z .c u,e v,C y i�.oi ce 7-r_r .'.4LOA-J.4 '' h712 0.2 - a G /N/ 174xrf.r.98/z/ry 2-/s/A14 42 L, Xirr.g- . /i4--4-70)c 0. 2 /2 = o. / /A) / > o. oy O •� ) .i -"/e4-r-/vN t W 6? ,z2.es4A) -r• ,g/1 \Y/o '6-y/,! any Bonn vs /. 3"-7v.e'•1-t5-.E . ys rr1 /CC) ✓tP -r" */).? 2 /erEvvn/D'11 C y r'FA k1/9 g WV Q[//t-)777y GO iI77-OL - /r loNv/7"/oiqs = /8z -)7/ A00 0, vfs re.<1/io vs = 0. 39 c/l = ss 5,81E zq 7"-?p, ' /A 7� = 2.57 l fly,•). /-;-7 - 2. S Ormx = 0 03 Gtr = 3- l = O. /Z yo _ 3, 4s = p, /4 Ps - 3.9 = o . i s ( 14,56) (05 0) fl• 0.3 �t = [ay (zoo)�,ex 0. 24 °.�]/z. c x o 04S = • SYMONS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc. PROJECT PAGE 3,3 JOB NO. BY DATE CQA P17/0js►s W07,: 7zzi' P.."vi c s- CA) (0.12 x S�� t (0. 8q) = 07, 4- o. 13A-c //-W/21//n vS = 0. /( A-G / C� = 9 8 _ /1i4 o./2 R-c ,Bx,(ji, j 4-1.LOCAnoisli -15(),) 2 # thr 7 zE IA 2 yip Q /`7Ax = o, 18 cs .S = 0. 24- /0 = 0,2t. 2 - 0. 33 L =15 /oD = 0. 39 - ,tsv c7s - 2.S, 0 s7v/e4-*, 7.1-710( s /soz 7.5 PePrH 2 0 = 0, 0 Cis' - O. i z l0 - 0, /9- = 0. 18 /0D 0.36 ,Lis, / -7 , 7 oizi / 9' / ' 1 47 / ,=/ f.2'7- - /.E-a 'a of r/,'1 5 0" = 4. 47 z _ 1-s/ -.q = 9 3. 3 Lf- Lr_-ss t1I1 . • KING COUNTY, WA . INGTON, SURFACE WA1 .t DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.213 SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS • • • SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Ex1sT Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% L.A1Y1' or more of the area 68 80 O 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 PA9�QI Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 8 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 CU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 . for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 CU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 • 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. *p 3.5.2-3 11/92 8 .< .• -, • • , .- ' , ••• 45C I 420 COO FEET 5A . • • -. .r -........ f■ ••■ .4,„,W. ,r, ... , . „r,. , Nap...1Q„.„4„,,,(.4. %.-.4-1.„1.....% . ,., ■ -.5.,,,,,• -,-... i .. . ,-,- ,:. - ;k .„„i"_,. '''Jrc -4....7„„iv...-17, -c7N-';;V: ,41,01...--:•■• ;::31 A.,,,,,.+1.10,'.3p.,,,,*r- tivi 4 ,4 , 4.- _ ,AA,......, ,..A.;•,,,#.?„..f., ... ,,, ...al ,,r, . ,. •:.:-.,......7.q. •.-'I-'13; •*- 011/ ' --4' - -41■ •(4,, ...- , • „As:, • __, 5 -la . .,• ,,*(40E ...„„ ..s. ,41c42.,..-* ,. ,34W".:.-1,45,V. .‘-:- 1404.•riA ,-14;„,,i0.7_,... "_., •;,44110`,'";,„- ` :.14,:•'4:55- •Igi. - 1" '..x. ' 10:•11,1't ' , iL 3T,±•• 1 .‘,.44,:,04; \:!..7'741.'Y'rft; - ..f.'‘ .;,..1 -'. -onie, • i......; .070.-- 7-440`s?4,7.-,t .• t.... . :.: •. i, _..,.., • IA., - •••ifi 4', .' '4- ..7-.': 14 -.4fR .1144:Vtt'AVIC26.*.a, '' -idr - '.•7 ' I- ill.44.ir,7 -4. or if,t, . ,... .--a, . . 4' ••••• ' '. " •• I 4C , 1.1. ..1,-. • ` •- 401. 1 ' ••1 ...-._.,"0.. •.. .72; .a2 ; ,,.... .., . , ...... ,. e ,., ,r) , . .-/ . .• . .4. ,-, I, ....,„.4,?‘ C . -/ t 'L.:'.''•4 ' . ff. .:•••„lx 'fitZiiii' f• ktY; ' 4k; ..-1 .-.,— -.' f''. , .. 6 i ! - krairgie Ilkt 7' -1' '.i't .' f',:: " ''' 1 '0 ..avolif". '-- --: . .-• '.. . ___ gv.'",....„ ' ....,....."-i;-.-ag it-:"t /1 .i264::,' lir• ..•\•...4.;4"-":1 ' • • '111*-...V-4:-.. . .,,..,.,1 a.„, ---.4."•'4' ii'•71"*.1:41•* •., -1....,•4" .: •41. it,!f...,.....9...„-"N-f:irr'r..:•:11...:.,:::Z:r4,..;... _.. .-,, ex-:;.:,......:„ ,:. .1.,. •:.:.,,,,tx •., ,vz , k 0„ 3 , .:. . •4. e<:.4.;.,44.-4i.,-:4 - .4.*PPF,::11',•1.•''': '.4 9:::--'....1.- -,* :- -,..r -• it:: , 01:7•:•,. ,.... - .. ) '. * .' • ; 't''44 t -,?,•r _ 417.. A44-• La-;..-• zi.. WI r' -C . ,...1 , 11:....., ....--.7:46:a,: - Cul. .‘‘s#113-kli; ..4 •' f.‘Pn.ili -,. • 5 '`'7 1•-,- .1 • - :, ,„,"i „. 45...j ..)i tb..„. • eArl:.7 - A--'. : ' '11114,4-:144,. Abgiler..,Z. le,4,..,„=,4,... .. at 4-55* ` ..'. :44,, ,,....,„ .• 4.4 ''6 '94j__, 11.•:;1';':- fitoc ".:. kiliffig \ --; ,1,. ' "*Ir"f: :el.irti -.. ,-, ,„ . izi°!,- ,.;•1. ..f -v.:my...77 4, 11....,9....-mlithrt.t0./4113A Iv,.---. -..t:i__a-4 .. fli.c.. 4.•':,...W.dc.-of;-..-4.4,;±.....;:.••-...44,,,4-..--.19C 1.41's: 1-`.0.' •• • -, ..--rf.,' 4/ps....-1 00000 ,... -,,014atex _ j -lin Vittr-E.v...igr' :!;,-.. t.t\ k. ..•-... ...Ole'..,.f...r, - . .......,..-• ..,,.... .1... .:..*s.:. .,--;:. :1.•• • ,,..- :1...=.i.- ,.. ; .<4' s't. ' 41'7.'4 ir :0.‘11!11.4"''t.1.4i : ..ri, , :.71.,WI* '' ,..' ,,411ii.64.:.;;Itz,.4.4;;LIF..'''. gtk"',15'21":0 A it".'7.44f•ir'at., . .....r 371 7,iiits.%' ,i3k t ‘. co . .11 IS za : :6: 14,4 jel:-. .F2....vii.,....• _., ,,,q,, , 7: ,...1 . . ,. , 1 „, ,. -, ',..-....4 it - „ , , , - ••••, a.. lia , , irs .1' . to..d 4., ,..,... e ,,' rz.4-‘1_ ,••• 4 • 1 -';t;i■• .., .1. 1. t 7 -■ • .f..../....-"..e.. z i *-*”' .. .'Z-.• .. 'A, .-ir-", .1 t._ #,. ,„le - -",..". ..",..c., „...t ... , - . .1, ' 5,4! i., ,! 0: / '. .'4' /*re' C4 C:.ALI /A '.' :,1)•"..•4 ‘b $42 I._.:-P....t. rvi(fi*:'71 it' ' 0' ',.Yi.1.■it;r 41C er,f Ca 1 „..,... ..,-L.,„..., • 1ii, , i't ' i! -,--- " •••• 1...,...F.g.:: 1 rr!,,i1;'• *.4- t-' a,i1.. ‘•: vi .,(.... 4.;:pr. 9 ---• : itkert --. . ,, ,..2' , ' ..." wro. . ,.,.. ... '• fl„ 11 t .... •% .111. ''. • 141114,..■•' I .4.-t.. ' h.', . )■‘ kl..„..t , I. . r" :402(.. •4''" e.' ?I,t Ale'. ''.' F ,, ',if , 4' i',14' .4‘1,,y. ...-., T.Q., .1 '41 -,,t, "Alt • -.. "!,48ilLi al • ,•,4 i ... 6.4... .24 .1%. --t, ' - ',•fit''' ' , - ,t,„....tr, -,... ..zit,„.. '•,i,,.t. .,••:;420,,,,t-lzt-Ti .. 1 00.11.....A.4,-•,...."'7;fT.,-,14$r. , .... 1 ..„ r, ../, ...literti,„0.-reira"..-"7 , 4,...;-z-..,.:•,,-, -", ..."1 ix 2., -0.i."-•" '.'it•...:,:d..- .1.-'' i Alif 1.-...„-_,....7„v.,...i. ,..,...•."istiti , ,...,rk.,....- „. ...,.., .,, .43.4..,,- ,_; #11 - •. V stir 4440 IV-..„, gi . .1. ,-,• . I,.• . , -,, `11, r,t 0.w, .. -4- .-.41144...iur..-...o, 71/......, v- . r t .. -- .. 4 ...AI .,,. , .. ..,, ‘.,,I . .4.;40,/„„itA . ....".0,70' 1 .. • 5 ...1,- . ..-1.04-s..-■,h ....„,,,,:c ,01,,,, ?tent,. ‘;.?‘ ', - Os ..•T l't ' '44/ 4,0," 4.1k ik-k ' Y41410 Alii. dt lir?... .4^`,.....‘ ' -4'..... ,i,- "efr, r .-- • . 5.',1 " A f iV8' ,),..k.„1'4?) .- ' "1:4-!::,/' ,'. ''..',* V., ..m"-7.:. ,,,-./ .,. 4T.)•••;s?,''q 'V' '. to, `a - -$`....- • - "...) r.••••-7-44*,,,,„. .r..1.,,KN,vir -...., . .., ,,_.c. , 0, * 4..i.,t--r."-'2. ', .- ' • ''''''.'Fil* "(. .X\ ';',1,$ 0-1.4440**r.. 4,41i"lit.':*•*...4*iiiatik.:;:ili*.*. 't ./t.4r., blir-frr. ,. Al 1 Lri. "-z. :-- -, "'7'IT-' '‘.+011 '0 if:. 7/ ');f' 'r?----'11--f- Otp,..;•.re"rli*-- ''''' -jii, 4 XI _ '.- ,.. .0 a? -4, ' a. "i---"-I - '-- - -1t,4 ••• ' — - tt'Y ,..: --40S. 4411,-.4:41,14=1:11%., './'• 7;i: 1 • ,‘.-2:.4 .t.. ...4. .0' '- f I rt • t-4 ' '- . s• ' . 1.4' 2k ^' 'F'-Aio .- `, .F. v-% 4. ryi. 4 i \ E1,040t....F101Z1-... 14. •WP:.,...\,. :.../.... ', ', r4i, 7 .,44 -',141.? .So? .:Vrir;e4 ' ,4t ' , ' To.,..• ' . ,-...1 ' _-.1caqt•-"Ia. '1.!Pvwx,viz-. ..0.• N . . ,'; 'PP -.. -i•- ,'`' 1.'1.4" 1 .7f,t..I.TA....r, , .r t.. * .• • : ....r.• it .,..e-q. ' ir ..n 4,4d'A•41//, .Lt ,,"-.:.,-- .4‘1,4‘ '• -1';.1.:,,v,..1s„;;.47-.',1,470. -..- 1100°.:;'ir''' 37C gi i'41 .-..'•. '-.`• - f.'•g.'-i•A, F.. • ‘,, ,sii, )1.. . .ft.,„. ,- . ,..0 - 4 V- .'s.*•.''' . '7•,—:.% " 0 ..4.41 1 , . - ?.,--.v • -.A.. :sr x., s ._. A.., -. r-.4 ;1:-..., ,.,.'1/4.1 .. . . ' . .- \ -,•fi ..., , •. . ,,,, ....... a! CUi,.'" 1 7; ■ ,m • . Ihe• 4.. ,J ..4 ' 1.: .1'II •■ • * {' 1,-;-‘3., i ii5..... 7 i• ,:.,.44; "" 1,7■F' I-• -•■•• , , • ' ' • • -1-• .'i ...100 ■ .1. .1 1 r . *, ,r „. -0,44 . 4•,,:i - .., • , ,f., , .,..,. '' ..\I.' -* . ' „ ,'F'l r i - ■- ,. •).7,,ir ... ..i•- ; ,, - i''t f ' . \ ' ' :` *4. ' ' :.:VI '.. ."4' L'' - . , . ..,,,4) le rule, c. .„.-•.,4,.., . • ,::,,,,ise:ipp4..-•!„;r4.s. .,..:44,4 ,.. ...,.. 4 iii...., 1.i.. .,.. .....„„-•. . it . '7 a_. , <1 Vi„ •..,,,, ,011..INIMILNAIIP',,I i IVIG M. AMR.fi...........areFf.a.:....,,, _.•..,b.a,-.... '1.1..' .1 y-ap els. , N,_ , %••■ '..• olegli -AU. °''‘`7", 4,4%itl'.7-::..'''el n.' .sek47.{V,0_,, I r •:141M)'7 C.• .::.1.-i h'iePas**- 7.141)%%It. Jib,-' 4110AVielge‘‘.4, ''.,4i.' ..1 ' ist,-7., a , .„--vc.-......: , .....,,-470-7.--:-.. 45C 1 1 1:--.. •-2•''''7.:- /'`'...---'2 .'il "01.11'.41 r4e-k;'.. 4. .:WRi`ir''`.<..---$444:- F-t;'" ,. .' 'it ■trix-.4,4,..'",'"),S+4 Vt9F,C14rfit"....u.'.1.:7::: 31 -&. ,:.7:,102:r-77/4", - . if sfl.,i1-.,,,4'."*. .',N4iti.'..TA., '4' 77-07414-kgal.,;•- ,•67.A.A • 4 ....1:11r.i ti,,,14■44,.fiK.:Vt.,V ik"fri!PAIZIII..ZICIretY. f...: • . '41,.07,4'",/4 . tit-eiga .F,J---:,-ifs4,-.40;54 .wsp•:-.. ,•r %.- .‘■,„) --otan.,,,, . ywiiii•ortf;,,ettr...r, _ i ••tm zra ,k,a 1 4, ;411. • ti's ''''', • ' 11 ,:,..,.;--,"`NriaZ,N- ..-•' it A. ,.; ,e, it. ..•,-- ; (Nyi.e....,,i6.7-ze...4, t et*. -. •zo' art) 1-a- % le 4 P.1,,,i o. "1,. f'-.1%;.'ff,41.4,/, 10,,,,-...4...- '..4p.sc"?„;;•>..0- r., ; jo...tV. .1.4 t:-W V6.1.11.- i'il.k.a74. -5 to* 1 i ..i. .j....,, I,.,•,. „ •-;14.3f4 t,„,,,,1..r.......,;0,, ,.g.t.;,. i,.../dio . - .... - - . ... ', . 'I- • ``,..- 1-' .gi., 11M- ■Akiirn I .-,2,,T.tj ,....1$.4"\\.'s.. ' - ,- - p•ii. ..t1-40, ,,, i . ''''''.•,, !•, -‘" /a Or p .. . • • • 41, %:. 4.74 /111..1, -NV . i',,,,, . ' . ,.. ,,,,N•:;,le •- ' .4..,111110111"'NI: ' - , ;•.4-.;,,: ;;,.th. 71„:1„),.. 14-:,• 4 .;,,,,, Acix;,,,,relk.....,,..,.,,dv, • t •<,,ft, -t. ,'1," .4. ".", ''' . :Arii$-Iff V:1:-.-.-t I:coif,-,.... tiii•ri 1,041e," r• Kr,,,4r.'.. .!k it..t, `, - ..'■• ..,,\ •;.,,;1,.., , A., .\ Alw . N;;;N:,L'Air a ' 1 ` -54,- if ' 'r,;;;.'-'-...,0 Ay .."1044,-_,4 • .... -Aeih ..• ao. -0■AitiOlt, 4- .4.),. vt. 4,■ ,6.- ,',"- -4r,\ 46 .1.414 .1114i....V.,..„-77464 :2' If .:-.4.1... fs:--1.1y.,./,,4tv:N.Y;t5reglir.400". 4, .‘;Niatipte1:,i`,,>.,..alik,or;,,t•1 ciso,;fr' L'4,44',V,p,iihrlioot ' ...,,:c7..,.`.:</ ,''r,,i?....1.' ,i41.• ,rzi; 4..-/-,.....,;:.4.. ..,,,..4 .S7: "Creif`li',:e.t...;41*. ...'?".. ,...k.. ,-, .).,.44 44:.tipp,e,-7.04,.yfi / - ti •••=arerit_...14.--?/.? --. -— .121t:vc.,.. '-1;. •ifeifri-,....0_,,,:r-' ,w4,,,,..,*.tai,- ,„,- , „,,„,..„.„. .,:.,...t fa _ ,_ i 0 ,--,,, , jr:eger,.. ...,„,„7, -. • ;,...•,'--4'01V‘.S.• 0 . '•-•-.4,14, 'Ii!... ,4 r;,...-740'lareof killril.-tli Pi.4. ,ere,'''' 5411t.'..• 4741.C...4. -NI.. .4104%.41.4. 7,4t: .,;(..1:....1.7.;,;:i. p. .P.fr. 1 ;-..„„, _........?.<as .. — , ..... 1,t,t, :47:: gro....7.(t..0 7 :....,...:,.,„ 7,0'1 0 ,•• 0,2.; / ,,,,n.1.,k.4 - NIC,:,1,1 ... :A AO -:••?vv., ...,T;,„:,,-„.... . 51,•75,\ :44;..11.-„F,:,-;ies,',age_ ,. ,i ' • SI.%-..(Yra Po. x -,,,,• -- b..1 • .'",%! '•A„:t." P:'"I 7-4- I••,- ' ..1.‹,:;..-.:...:-;: ,"'I -Sret NL.:?,..i,c' %NIL!: i PP' t; .,'„S 4., ."PIdgt:AT!.:...zurtir 1:C9, -•4101i!,,,t•NN...1.1,4,01-1,2,P. AA& . • is f•;:-.1`•• .'' i, I . .11-14 41.5LX47 ' II is', t.... . s. .•.- irn.:1.,,, . ... ...,. -.. L., ,.. , ;.... .., .....,,. . . . . ...;,, .w.. , ,144. .\,...-:.. 4. .. • • . . .-.4,144 1 417,,•;.11 ...t .,. ,v • ... ,27. . eh; ..,.vs ' ' -.-1 -•'' ; io. .prA ,: i -'-iimforv,,ieco,-34,_....0'w„,...,-7 .,,,Q,-137,1X.P,,,• I:Ago-40...14.,-7 r • .,:-•:::4::<••,.6., 1,....0-11/14.,.--,4 ii ..r.• „.• 4 .• ,i• ., ..' 11/ ' aq 1,47'‘".0'4..0 (4.41Fr ' "1)'.'le •:r e''"'''" 4,1:* .i--:',..;...•-c1:-. \\• . p...-.e.b,..-1.-....,,,,,, .t.. ,ri-: -n:■-. liffc,r'et. ,Iii ;47,.k.„.1,,,e116 ),••••-.0'...- p64.0.P: ' ' ..•i-I'Y'ril. ' le p: ,,:.:;-)../...,......t..,:„.\ er.,*_,* ,,,,..,46.- ..,sh. 1..21, •• 41i ..:.•:/ I• r • ft% ,:.'t:'.1-1•14p.br.,,' , jcifeir,7r.mee4lIre%17. :iligeolli.i 4"C.. .'.1,1',' ';„........,.44.4'.. : ":Lf.•''''.7)•;*:%.,•,•steltiti-7 •- 1 if 141‘ 14: .14$ 1 14.liA. ...0 I•r.VP:J.,,scris.t-11:--' t• '1.,r"." 'ft..,, ,:.0, ,;^';$&•,r te4‘.......,'„. ...14.4whel.'.4-1.t.'W..4,4.7. • / ,-._,.......• 41.„.„...m.. ...,, - • ...,.•.‘„,,-,.. ;........:4 14, • .;/...% ......: .‘- •....-,fix.,, .. 141 • ' ,772-4;:- ', ek-t ,7",.,:::? ".... rejilivi-,61...-V:St g ; •-r•2221.. --:•.•••=....k../,•..., ,ittij; --ver-11 ---:---s-444itsi ,0 . I.- - .plr • r.;,■ • A• • L ,..,:...e,;•,)ilii.e.;;;,,,,, -sly raft:,..-_,.....s.i.ie. .,.....:-.,...„„,•,,.. , .. .k.., ii. „, _ .. -...,04,41 ,......,.,k• ....);,..., !t•&■1 5 ..... .i.big. .„.4v .,: ,• ,.....s4e4rtir......,...4zcirtr. --c!...cd.,..$..-, 4.7f Aii-7 ..crttlivipli .4 )114„,., 41...N,.,,pred .4*V ' -.......4.; .4,04 . ...-y-,...;.12,n.,<'-.4, ..,,-c„,x,t.-r-• - El- - 44* ..1..r.a.:..,&_4N.4_, ..c.e pp/./1",,:fe.,;,---:;r.eAtiy? _1:4-..";:i::::.. . V R9 . "..,104Xier..1 .4.-:;%Yk.;-';_.'. .:. •-.....- ' .v.01.7.t.We.4....It\All ag• P 1 1: 11D 37: 30 1 Mile 1% A it f I 5 000 Feet 4 L-ofriA /--).-/o. ciE 42 o.z - 0. 6 Pe-g/iE-4-2 5 r 1_,rry 9 20x7+Z. Hydraflow Plan View VALL - C70V-JVSTREAri 'DP/ IM,-SE ANALys►s T..1 18 • 19 20 f 14 • 15 • 16 �C NOT /NTr;IZCOC1N1£GT5p l O 9 • 10 7 • 8 Project file: 2042.stm IDF file: SAMPLE.IDF No. Lines: 21 06-11-2001 Hydraflow Storm Sewer Inventory Report Page 1 . s Line Alignment Flow Data Physical Data Line ID No. ■ Dnstr Line Defl Junc Known Drng Runoff Inlet Invert Line Invert Line Line N J-loss Inlet/ line length angle type Q area coeff time El Dn slope El Up size type value coeff Rim El No. (ft) (deg) (cfs) (ac) (C) (min) (ft) (%) (ft) (In) (n) (K) (ft) 1 End 27.0 20.0 MH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 164.35 1.30 164.70 18 Cir 0.013 0.85 169.01 1 2 1 94.0 70.0 MH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 164.70 -0.21 164.50 12 Cir 0.013 1.00 168.87 2 3 2 48.0 -90.0 MH 0.00 1.76 0.39 0.0 164.50 1.04 165.00 18 Cir 0.013 1.00 168.99 3 4 3 196.0 90.0 MR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 165.00 1.02 167.00 15 Or 0.013 0.15 171.46 4 5 4 148.0 0.0 MH 0.00 0.41 0.57 0.0 167.00 4.05 173.00 15 Cir 0.013 1.00 175.12 5 6 5 39.0 0.0 MH 0.00 3.32 0.39 0.0 173.00 1.79 173.70 15 Cir 0.013 1.00 176.33 6 7 6 450.0 -90.0 MR 0.00 5.31 0.39 0.0 173.70 4.00 191.70 12 Cir 0.013 0.15 194.70 7 8 7 920.0 0.0 HdwIl 0.00 0.45 0.39 7.0 191.70 2.95 218.80 15 Cir 0.024 1.00 221.80 8 9 5 450.0 -90.0 MH 0.00 0.59 0.57 0.0 173.00 4.00 191.00 12 Cir 0.013 0.15 194.00 9 10 9 920.0 0.0 Hdwll 0.00 0.05 0.81 7.0 191.00 2.95 218.10 12 Cir 0.024 1.00 221.10 10 a* -. 11 1 70.0 0.0 MH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 164.70 1.00 165.40 18 Cir 0.013 0.85 168.94 11 12 11 40.0 70.0 MH 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 165.40 1.50 166.00 18 Cir 0.013 1.00 168.94 12 13 12 53.0 -90.0 MH 0.00 8.10 0.39 0.0 166.00 3.40 167.80 18 Cir 0.013 0.15 170.80 13 14 13 990.0 0.0 MH 0.00 4.95 0.39 0.0 167.80 3.80 205.42 15 Cir 0.024 0.15 208.42 14 4E 15 14 595.0 0.0 MH 0.00 1.26 0.39 0.0 205.42 4.00 229.22 12 Cir 0.024 0.15 232.22 15 4t 16 15 185.0 0.0 HdwIl 0.00 0.81 0.48 6.1 229.22 7.80 243.65 12 Or 0.024 1.00 246.65 16 i1f 17 11 53.0 -20.0 MH 0.00 0.90 0.51 0.0 165.40 5.47 168.30 18 Cir 0.013 0.15 171.30 17 18 17 990.0 0.0 MR 0.00 0.55 0.51 0.0 168.30 3.80 205.92 12 Cir 0.024 0.15 208.92 18 19 18 595.0 0.0 MH 0.00 0.14 0.57 0.0 205.92 4.00 229.72 12 Cir 0.024 0.15 232.72 19 # 20 19 185.0 0.0 HdwIl 0.00 0.09 0.81 6.1 229.72 8.22 244.93 12 Cir 0.024 1.00 247.93 20 21 2 104.0 0.0 Grate 0.00 0.85 0.87 8.0 164.50 1.00 165.54 12 Cir 0.013 1.00 169.21 21 Project File: 2042.stm I-D-F File: FANNO_IDF.IDF Total number of lines:21 Date: 06-11-2001 -X P1TC►i t DAY Ct.JLV ys COM13lNaa 0 ov>�t.,4.,Ei7 AS ctir Hydraflow Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1 , Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Up Dn Up Dn Up Dn Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 27.0 0.00 29.54 0.00 0.00 12.44 0.0 32.6 0.6 7.70 11.96 5.80 18 1.30 164.70 164.35 165.76 165.40 169.01 168.00 1 2 1 94.0 0.00 12.74 0.00 0.00 5.58 0.0 32.2 0.6 3.47 0.00 4.42 12 -0.21 164.50 164.70 167.09 166.20 168.87 169.01 2 3 2 48.0 1.76 11.89 0.39 0.69 4.84 0.0 31.8 0.6 3.04 10.72 1.72 18 1.04 165.00 164.50 167.44 167.40 168.99 168.87 3 4 3 196.0 0.00 10.13 0.00 0.00 4.15 0.0 30.5 0.6 2.67 6.52 2.60 15 1.02 167.00 165.00 167.85 167.49 171.46 168.99 4 5 4 148.0 0.41 10.13 0.57 0.23 4.15 0.0 29.8 0.7 2.71 13.00 3.56 15 4.05 173.00 167.00 173.66 167.87 175.12 171.46 5 6 5 39.0 3.32 9.08 0.39 1.29 3.54 0.0 21.9 0.8 2.77 8.65 3.51 15 1.79 173.70 173.00 174.37 173.92 176.33 175.12 6 7 6 450.0 5.31 5.76 0.39 2.07 2.25 0.0 19.6 0.8 1.88 7.12 3.21 12 4.00 191.70 173.70 192.28 174.64 194.70 176.33 7 8 7 920.0 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.18 0.18 7.0 7.0 1.5 0.26 6.00 1.22 15 2.95 218.80 191.70 219.01 192.32 221.80 194.70 8 9 5 450.0 0.59 0.64 0.57 0.34 0.38 0.0 23.7 0.7 0.28 7.12 1.25 12 4.00 191.00 173.00 191.22 173.92 194.00 175.12 9 10 9 920.0 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.04 0.04 7.0 7.0 1.5 0.06 3.31 0.91 12 2.95 218.10 191.00 218.20 191.24 221.10 194.00 10 IN 11 1 70.0 0.00 16.80 0.00 0.00 6.86 0.0 23.2 0.8 5.19 10.50 3.90 18 1.00 165.40 164.70 166.27 166.20 168.94 169.01 11 12 11 40.0 0.00 15.12 0.00 0.00 5.97 0.0 15.8 0.9 5.66 12.86 4.42 18 1.50 166.00 165.40 166.91 166.59 168.94 168.94 12 13 12 53.0 8.10 15.12 0.39 3.16 5.97 0.0 15.6 1.0 5.70 19.35 4.28 18 3.40 167.80 166.00 168.71 167.31 170.80 168.94 13 14 13 990.0 4.95 7.02 0.39 1.93 2.81 0.0 11.2 1.2 3.24 6.82 3.80 15 3.80 205.42 167.80 206.14 168.77 208.42 170.80 14 15 14 595.0 1.26 2.07 0.39 0.49 0.88 0.0 7.5 1.4 1.27 3.86 2.70 12 4.00 229.22 205.42 229.70 206.19 232.22 208.42 15 16 15 185.0 0.81 0.81 0.48 0.39 0.39 6.1 6.1 1.6 0.63 5.39 2.15 12 7.80 243.65 229.22 243.99 229.73 246.65 232.22 16 17 11 53.0 0.90 1.68 0.51 0.46 0.89 0.0 22.6 0.8 0.68 24.56 1.49 18 5.47 168.30 165.40 168.62 166.59 171.30 168.94 17 18 17 990.0 0.55 0.78 0.51 0.28 0.43 0.0 14.9 1.0 0.42 3.76 2.14 12 3.80 205.92 168.30 206.20 168.63 208.92 171.30 18 19 18 595.0 0.14 0.23 0.57 0.08 0.15 0.0 8.4 1.4 0.21 3.86 1.53 12 4.00 229.72 205.92 229.91 206.21 232.72 208.92 19 20 19 185.0 0.09 0.09 0.81 0.07 0.07 6.1 6.1 1.6 0.12 5.53 1.35 12 8.22 244.93 229.72 245.08 229.92 247.93 232.72 20 21 2 104.0 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.74 0.74 8.0 8.0 1.4 1.03 3.56 1.31 12 1.00 165.54 164.50 167.49 167.40 169.21 168.87 21 Project File: 2042.stm I-D-F File: FANNO_IDF.IDF Total number of lines:21 Run Date: 06-11-2001 NOTES: Intensity=5.18/(Tc+0.70)^0.61; Return period= 2 Yrs. ; Initial taiiwater elevation= 165.40 (ft) Hydraflow Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1 . Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Eiev Line ID coeff - (I) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Up Dn Up Dn Up Dn Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 27.0 0.00 29.54 0.00 0.00 12.44 0.0 30.7 0.8 10.06 11.96 6.97 18 1.30 164.70 164.35 165.94 165.41 169.01 168.00 1 2 1 94.0 0.00 12.74 0.00 0.00 5.58 0.0 30.4 0.8 4.54 0.00 5.77 12 -0.21 164.50 164.70 168.01 166.49 168.87 169.01 2 3 2 48.0 1.76 11.89 0.39 0.69 4.84 0.0 30.1 0.8 3.96 10.72 2.24 18 1.04 165.00 164.50 168.60 168.53 168.99 168.87 3 4 3 196.0 0.00 10.13 0.00 0.00 4.15 0.0 28.9 0.8 3.48 6.52 2.84 15 1.02 167.00 165.00 169.25 168.68 171.46 168.99 4 5 4 148.0 0.41 10.13 0.57 0.23 4.15 0.0 28.3 0.8 3.53 13.00 3.73 15 4.05 173.00 167.00 173.75 169.27 175.12 171.46 5 6 5 39.0 3.32 9.08 0.39 1.29 3.54 0.0 20.8 1.0 3.61 8.65 3.92 15 1.79 173.70 173.00 174.46 174.08 176.33 175.12 6 7 6 450.0 5.31 5.76 0.39 2.07 2.25 0.0 18.8 1.1 2.43 7.12 3.75 12 4.00 191.70 173.70 192.36 174.79 194.70 176.33 7 8 7 920.0 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.18 0.18 7.0 7.0 1.9 0.33 6.00 1.30 15 2.95 218.80 191.70 219.03 192.41 221.80 194.70 8 9 5 450.0 0.59 0.64 0.57 0.34 0.38 0.0 22.8 1.0 0.36 7.12 1.38 12 4.00 191.00 173.00 191.26 174.08 194.00 175.12 9 10 9 920.0 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.04 0.04 7.0 7.0 1.9 0.08 3.31 0.97 12 2.95 218.10 191.00 218.22 191.27 221.10 194.00 10 11 1 70.0 0.00 16.80 0.00 0.00 6.86 0.0 22.0 1.0 6.76 10.50 3.95 18 1.00 165.40 164.70 166.73 166.49 168.94 169.01 11 12 11 40.0 0.00 15.12 0.00 0.00 5.97 0.0 14.8 1.2 7.43 12.86 4.94 18 1.50 166.00 165.40 167.04 166.95 168.94 168.94 12 13 12 53.0 8.10 15.12 0.39 3.16 5.97 0.0 14.6 1.3 7.48 19.35 4.97 18 3.40 167.80 166.00 168.84 167.54 170.80 168.94 13 14 13 990.0 4.95 7.02 0.39 1.93 2.81 0.0 10.8 1.5 4.20 6.82 4.27 15 3.80 205.42 167.80 206.24 168.92 208.42 170.80 14 15 14 595.0 1.26 2.07 0.39 0.49 0.88 0.0 7.4 1.8 1.62 3.86 2.98 12 4.00 229.22 205.42 229.76 206.30 232.22 208.42 15 16 15 185.0 0.81 0.81 0.48 0.39 0.39 6.1 6.1 2.0 0.80 5.39 2.32 12 7.80 243.65 229.22 244.03 229.79 246.65 232.22 16 17 11 53.0 0.90 1.68 0.51 0.46 0.89 0.0 21.5 1.0 0.89 24.56 1.62 18 5.47 168.30 165.40 168.66 166.95 171.30 168.94 17 18 17 990.0 0.55 0.78 0.51 0.28 0.43 0.0 14.3 1.3 0.55 3.76 2.31 12 3.80 205.92 168.30 206.23 168.68 208.92 171.30 18 19 18 595.0 0.14 0.23 0.57 0.08 0.15 0.0 8.2 1.7 0.27 3.86 1.63 12 4.00 229.72 205.92 229.94 206.25 232.72 208.92 19 20 19 185.0 0.09 0.09 0.81 0.07 0.07 6.1 6.1 2.0 0.15 5.53 1.44 12 8.22 244.93 229.72 245.09 229.95 247.93 232.72 20 21 2 104.0 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.74 0.74 8.0 8.0 1.8 1.30 3.56 1.66 12 1.00 165.54 164.50 168.67 168.53 169.21 168.87 21 Project File: 2042.stm I-D-F File: FANNO_IDF.IDF Total number of lines:21 Run Date: 06-11-2001 NOTES:Intensity=6.78/(Tc+0.90)A 0.62; Return period= 5 Yrs.; Initial tailwater elevation=165.41 (ft) • Hydraflow Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1, Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full - Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Up Dn Up Dn Up Dn Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (In) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 27.0 0.00 29.54 0.00 0.00 12.44 0.0 j 29.4 1.0 11.96 11.96 7.47 18 1.30 164.70 164.35 166.02 165.59 169.01 168.00 1 2 1 94.0 0.00 12.74 0.00 0.00 5.58 0.0 29.2 1.0 5.39 0.00 6.86 12 -0.21 164.50 164.70 168.87 166.72 168.87 169.01 2 3 2 48.0 1.76 11.89 0.39 0.69 4.84 0.0 28.9 1.0 4.70 10.72 2.66 18 1.04 165.00 164.50 169.69 169.60 168.99 168.87 3 4 3 196.0 0.00 10.13 0.00 0.00 4.15 0.0 27.9 1.0 4.12 6.52 3.36 15 1.02 167.00 165.00 170.60 169.80 171.46 168.99 4 5 4 148.0 0.41 10.13 0.57 0.23 4.15 0.0 27.3 1.0 4.17 13.00 4.15 15 4.05 173.00 167.00 173.82 170.63 175.12 171.46 5 6 5 39.0 3.32 9.08 0.39 1.29 3.54 0.0 20.1 1.2 4.28 8.65 4.25 15 1.79 173.70 173.00 174.53 174.19 176.33 175.12 6 7 6 450.0 5.31 5.76 0.39 2.07 2.25 0.0 18.3 1.3 2.87 7.12 4.20 12 4.00 191.70 173.70 192.42 174.91 194.70 176.33 7 8 7 920.0 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.18 0.18 7.0 7.0 2.2 0.38 6.00 1.35 15 2.95 218.80 191.70 219.05 192.47 221.80 194.70 8 9 5 450.0 0.59 0.64 0.57 0.34 0.38 0.0 22.2 1.1 0.43 7.12 1.48 12 4.00 191.00 173.00 191.28 174.19 194.00 175.12 9 10 9 920.0 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.04 0.04 7.0 7.0 2.2 0.09 3.31 1.00 12 2.95 218.10 191.00 218.23 191.29 221.10 194.00 10 -� 11 1 70.0 0.00 16.80 0.00 0.00 6.86 0.0 21.3 1.2 8.01 10.50 4.53 18 1.00 165.40 164.70 167.12 166.72 168.94 169.01 11 12 11 40.0 0.00 15.12 0.00 0.00 5.97 0.0 14.2 1.5 8.86 12.86 5.01 18 1.50 166.00 165.40 167.68 167.39 168.94 168.94 12 13 12 53.0 8.10 15.12 0.39 3.16 5.97 0.0 14.0 1.5 8.91 19.35 5.62 18 3.40 167.80 166.00 168.94 168.07 170.80 168.94 13 14 13 990.0 4.95 7.02 0.39 1.93 2.81 0.0 10.5 1.8 4.95 6.82 4.67 15 3.80 205.42 167.80 206.31 169.03 208.42 170.80 14 15 14 595.0 1.26 2.07 0.39 0.49 0.88 0.0 7.4 2.1 1.88 3.86 3.20 12 4.00 229.22 205.42 229.80 206.38 232.22 208.42 15 16 15 185.0 0.81 0.81 0.48 0.39 0.39 6.1 6.1 2.4 0.91 5.39 2.43 12 7.80 243.65 229.22 244.06 229.84 246.65 232.22 16 17 11 53.0 0.90 1.68 0.51 0.46 0.89 0.0 20.8 1.2 1.06 24.56 1.73 18 5.47 168.30 165.40 168.69 167.39 171.30 168.94 17 18 17 990.0 0.55 0.78 0.51 0.28 0.43 0.0 14.0 1.5 0.65 3.76 2.43 12 3.80 205.92 168.30 206.26 168.71 208.92 171.30 18 19 18 595.0 0.14 0.23 0.57 0.08 0.15 0.0 8.2 2.0 0.31 3.86 1.70 12 4.00 229.72 205.92 229.96 206.28 232.72 208.92 19 20 19 185.0 0.09 0.09 0.81 0.07 0.07 6.1 6.1 2.4 0.17 5.53 1.49 12 8.22 244.93 229.72 245.11 229.97 247.93 232.72 20 21 2 104.0 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.74 0.74 8.0 8.0 2.0 1.51 3.56 1.92 12 1.00 165.54 164.50 169.78 169.60 169.21 168.87 21 Project File: 2042.stm I-D-F File: FANNO_IDF.IDF Total number of lines:21 Run Date: 06-11-2001 NOTES:Intensity=8.58/(Tc* 1.50)^0.64; Return period= 10 Yrs.; Initial tailwater elevation=165.59 (ft) Hydraflow Storm Sewer Tabulation Page 1 . Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd I Rim Elev Line ID coeff (I) flow full - - Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Up Dn Up Dn Up Dn Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 27.0 0.00 29.54 0.00 0.00 12.44 0.0 28.2 1.1 14.19 11.96 8.03 18 1.30 164.70 164.35 166.34 165.85 169.01 168.00 1 2 1 94.0 0.00 12.74 0.00 0.00 5.58 0.0 28.0 1.1 6.39 0.00 8.14 12 -0.21 164.50 164.70 170.22 167.20 168.87 169.01 2 3 2 48.0 1.76 11.89 0.39 0.69 4.84 0.0 27.8 1.2 5.57 10.72 3.15 18 1.04 165.00 164.50 171.39 171.25 168.99 168.87 3 4 3 196.0 0.00 10.13 0.00 0.00 4.15 0.0 27.0 1.2 4.87 6.52 3.97 15 1.02 167.00 165.00 172.66 171.54 171.46 168.99 4 5 4 148.0 0.41 10.13 0.57 0.23 4.15 0.0 26.4 1.2 4.93 13.00 4.65 15 4.05 173.00 167.00 173.89 172.70 175.12 171.46 5 6 5 39.0 3.32 9.08 0.39 1.29 3.54 0.0 19.5 1.4 5.05 8.65 4.73 15 1.79 173.70 173.00 174.60 174.32 176.33 175.12 6 7 6 450.0 5.31 5.76 0.39 2.07 2.25 0.0 17.8 1.5 3.37 7.12 4.71 12 4.00 191.70 173.70 192.48 175.04 194.70 176.33 7 8 7 920.0 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.18 0.18 7.0 7.0 2.5 0.44 6.00 1.41 15 2.95 218.80 191.70 219.07 192.54 221.80 194.70 8 9 5 450.0 0.59 0.64 0.57 0.34 0.38 0.0 21.7 1.3 0.50 7.12 1.59 12 4.00 191.00 173.00 191.30 174.32 194.00 175.12 9 10 9 920.0 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.04 0.04 7.0 7.0 2.5 0.10 3.31 1.04 12 2.95 218.10 191.00 218.24 191.32 221.10 194.00 10 c71 11 1 70.0 0.00 16.80 0.00 0.00 6.86 0.0 20.5 1.4 9.47 10.50 5.36 18 1.00 165.40 164.70 167.77 167.20 168.94 169.01 11 12 11 40.0 0.00 15.12 0.00 0.00 5.97 0.0 13.4 1.8 10.54 12.86 5.97 18 1.50 166.00 165.40 168.55 168.14 168.94 168.94 12 13 12 53.0 8.10 15.12 0.39 3.16 5.97 0.0 13.3 1.8 10.61 19.35 6.00 18 3.40 167.80 166.00 169.64 169.10 170.80 168.94 13 14 13 990.0 4.95 7.02 0.39 1.93 2.81 0.0 10.1 2.1 5.82 6.82 5.23 15 3.80 205.42 167.80 206.39 169.73 208.42 170.80 14 15 14 595.0 1.26 2.07 0.39 0.49 0.88 0.0 7.3 2.5 2.18 3.86 3.49 12 4.00 229.22 205.42 229.85 206.46 232.22 208.42 15 16 15 185.0 0.81 0.81 0.48 0.39 0.39 6.1 6.1 2.7 1.06 5.39 2.56 12 7.80 243.65 229.22 244.09 229.89 246.65 232.22 16 17 11 53.0 0.90 1.68 0.51 0.46 0.89 0.0 20.1 1.4 1.25 24.56 1.86 18 5.47 168.30 165.40 168.73 168.14 171.30 168.94 17 18 17 990.0 0.55 0.78 0.51 0.28 0.43 0.0 13.7 1.7 0.76 3.76 2.55 12 3.80 205.92 168.30 206.29 168.75 208.92 171.30 18 19 18 595.0 0.14 0.23 0.57 0.08 0.15 0.0 8.1 2.3 0.36 3.86 1.78 12 4.00 229.72 205.92 229.97 206.31 232.72 208.92 19 20 19 185.0 0.09 0.09 0.81 0.07 0.07 6.1 6.1 2.7 0.20 5.53 1.55 12 8.22 244.93 229.72 245.12 229.99 247.93 232.72 20 21 2 104.0 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.74 0.74 8.0 8.0 2.4 1.74 3.56 2.22 12 1.00 165.54 164.50 171.50 171.25 169.21 168.87 21 Project File: 2042.stm I-D-F File: FANNO_IDF.IDF Total number of lines:21 Run Date: 06-11-2001 NOTES:Intensity=9.71/(Tc+1.40)A 0.63; Return period= 25 Yrs. ; Initial tailwater elevation= 165.85 (ft) CHART 10 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS * c- : % SOIL" DRAINAGE AREA SLOPE IMPERVIOUS TYPE Under 5% 5%to 10% Over 10% TYPICAL LAND USE*** CO Q A 0.19 0.24 0.29 Zones: OS, RF - /" 0 to 10 B 0.28 0.33 0.38 Other. Parks, Cemeteries& Playgrounds C 0.33 0.43 0.52 A 0.26 0.31 0.36 Zones: R20 10 to 20 B 0.35 0.40 0.45 C 0.39 0.48 0.57 A 0.34 0.39 0.44 Zones: R10 20 to 30 B 0.41 0.46 0.51 - C 0.45 0.54 0.62 A 0.41 0.46 0.51 Zones: R7, R5 - 30 to 40 B 0.48 0.53 0.58 C 0.51 0.59 0.67 A 0.49 0.54 0.59 Zones: R2.5, R3 • - 40 to 50 B 0.54 0.59 0.64 C 0.57 0.65 0.72 A 0.56 0.61 0.66 Zones: R2, CO1 50 to 60 B 0.61 0.66 0.71 Streets: Neighborhood-20' in 35' ROW C 0.63 0.70 0.77 Other: Schools A 0.64 0.69 0.74 Zones: R1, CN2, CO2 r • 60 to 70 B 0.67 0.72 p n Streets: Neighborhood- 24'to 28'in 40' ROW C 0.69 0.76 0.82 32'to 35'in 50' ROW Neighborhood Collector , A 0.71 0.76 0.81 Streets: Neighborhood-36' in 50' ROW 70 to 80 B 0.74 0.79 0.84 28' in 40'ROW C 0.75 0.81 0.87 Other: Hospitals - A 0.79 0.84 0.89 Zones: RH, CN1, CM, CS, CG, EG1, EG2, IG1, IG2 - 80 to 90 B 0.80 0.85 0.90 - - - C 0.81 0.87 0.92 - A 0.86 0.91 0.96 Zones: RX, CX, EX, IH 90 to 100 B 0.87 0.92 0.97 Streets: Community Arterial Commercial C 0.87 0.92 0.97 Paved Portion 41Anv Street N DRAINAGE AREA SLOPE • Runoff coefficients may be adjusted J SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS Under 5% 5%to 10% Over 10% to the nearest 0.05, if adjusted co consistently throughout the project. <- Woodlands rill Type A Soil 0.10 0.15 0.20 " Soil Types: Type B Soil 0.20 0.25 0.30 A=Gravel & sandy Loam Type C Soil 0.30 0.35 0.40 B = Light Clay& Silt Loam Lawns, Pasture And Meadows C=Tight Clay Type A Soll 0.15 0.20 0.25 "•The land uses are typical for a given r114 Type B Soil 0.25 0.30 0.35 percent of impervious surface. Where rli Type C Soil 0.30 0.40 0.50 there is or will be any significant Cultivated Land variation from typical conditions, Type A Soil 0.25 0.35 0.50 another percentage range should be ail Type B Soil 0.40 0.55 0.70 used. Type C Soil 0.50 0.65 0.80 Wit, Gravel Areas & Walks Loose 0.30 0.40 0.50 a, Packed 0.70 0.75 0.80 00 Pavements& Roofs 0.90 0.95 1.00 Y !I BES August 7, 1990 CHART 10 °o I0 7 • , Pc) G/ ,\v ion ?Z OAK 5T. 9 9 D 0.93e ^t /41,, OPCN D)TC�1-� f�: DJW GvLY�2Ts OA a UoTM 5)DLS OF OAK ST- I L = 595 S _ O.O¢,o 0' (300' 1 t- ' 4-55 ' S = O. 07$ PROJECT I g (0.39 Acres) I 1 I CD .c 1 Q 16.8 Acres r ■ I °w1 I 4'�i can a r ► cn1 ~jO�' - PINE ST.— _ ��•� gp� L = 452.7 ' — I s = I p•�S i 0 0. ro4o ks- L = 12.7,0' S = 0. o24s- 1 !SO 0s OPEN D JTGH 1 DA, vi..VF-,Z.T,5 1 .50TH S)DES of PINE 12. 7 Acres ..c I NORTH I 1 () I I = 1 z I �o e0-el -31 [MI•.II O xy • : 6 F0171-71 el'ut•1011113 A N'` d '� 0 0 I'. ,1 N .a_.1 71701 0 14/W M 7OM•37 W'I[I•MI;m 1 II I Ii i III II, II CH 711-37 I: IMad*•fill MRCS II 0 • 00103 M 11 O rN II WW2 Cu A WWI WAN. ■■ f • Ir • .1 h l0. OVl sva ammaci / 7amoa w eoarN.v aNN m r J 1 arf.0 _31N1-01• •////////////////////////////// 1 370d 1XBI1 I� 11117.�M 1 071 IKA 37NIMrl / i 11 ltllf 0IN1.•71■ CU AOLOWa 37f1014 1MiM1-�A/ ,� 1 w�i — / p (. 1.11 0wIN Y03L w, - -— I y•� • CI If1LD.al[Alf / —7 [gI - C / .1.Sad A Q • l 1.a J.1 c• 17031.11/.NM 1 KY 17 630.IV1I rii 7//////iii///////00///////////////y �� 5 ( A • i "yI MIMII pIM11100013W II iaa.ovOc 'mill M.M II It 11 11 11 II 9 • n "i • q i ii FSYf/•31 I, Ii Z•11•1•MI C Mill•O 301 M11 ; I A m AI 0 d ° • O 1 (� • O • • • r 34.1 0371117 .. _ P C �y/� NMI•ME Q 4 • 1331 LS MVO ■ iglu-71 K 01101_OW HMS --ES *VW-71 NMI•w O WWI_71 aid 0f7,i17 AI bbY' .fY WIIIII *WA.Si IYW.IMI O \Cbpv d so yvA/. f7»1_ 1 FN M 7 1-71 1 I/,,,, 1 , _..- ff i, I + �i i �} / I I I lL V X © ,� f� i ;‹,,,,x, ::\I:%4 x z . i _ p 1ja4 z X O I\II 00 "• 0,- *169.6 I _ C MN. O MN. ^ -up.�� I I Sl 1 x �O I 01 MH. 1 0 A ,, 0 MH. � ' _� 0 NH. + ,�� ,� '� i i I 1 i � i;�1 I .fir,0 + 74 ' '' �� I �, i•1 1 x 1 1 I I I II 1 jqr Vol' 0 1 I r-)-, • D x 7441 4. 41.11 t 1 i c), ‘WNibm , + :IQ I_ 111- „• ; itrik)I 1 LIM.11,,�,` . �Jp `rte xii �/ / c 11 R c) io — �� tii Z. (ill). I tilimIr. We° ' „ -. 1 c, P 93 0,- 1111,i 1 di �r,� ge 1 R--' .�•� I I p I `_� 1 1 �� at rezo �. i 1 1 �`' I ��0 I I 4 I 1 I `�}�I,) =, x.riki4r14. ---; X 1 blar 175. PINE MH.O �X19'L.2 / KH G,/� 0 B B � g r- Jf �, ©'” _ 1 - /- o 1.4 H. 0MH. ` 4i1 / � �- _� 5j. NN. S.W P I N E S T. G MH r I � � ©� �! �� x I � .� � 11 i � � 1 1 C. C.Imo 1 m 1 , 0 Haim s _, Ed) 1 , I Afor • 1 I 0 fa G 0 dri- �� 4---A,,, -1 11 `;• 0 r x 0„ ... -- — I TREES X . _�„� v � ,� �1 �}Z O • l IIII I mi. x BLS -. ` ■ &Ix- k c) x ` 1� © # 41 * d ,� 1 1\\ - ..,ate Ili 3 220 jo , 1110 ■G ID T 1 x � ��j Ni z c x ( C ) U c {c`�‘ c.I l �` �I 11 x D .s � � x X 'Q�VII% 2 i zoo \��J T h1 1 n 11 �`�-. I I I/>�. Ahk CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community atietrilt X^1 120 DAYS = 10/31/2001 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00008 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: HALL DAYCARE FACILITY APPLICANT: George and Pamela Wall OWNER: Same 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 PHONE/FAX: (503) 670-7814 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing duplex and construct a 5,035 square foot daycare facility with associated outdoor play area. LOCATION: 10530 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 2800. The subject site is located on the east side of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Oak Street. ZONE: C-P: Professional/Administrative Commercial District. The C-P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services, e.g., convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV J DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: JULY 9, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: JULY 23, 2001 El HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ['PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM 11 CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ® STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 9, 2001 _ COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® GEOTECH REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 317 i June 28, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD George and Pamela Wall 11600 SW Bull Mt. Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal-SDR2001-00008 - Dear Mr. Wall: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. The following clarifications and additional information are required before Staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1 . Preliminary sizing calculations for water quality facility. 2. 15 additional copies of application materials. Once the required information has been submitted, Staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 , x317. Sincerely,r'" .. i.•p,athew Scheidegger Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00008.acc.doc.dot c: SDR2001-00008 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 =cam! A. CITY OF TIGARD July 6, 2001 OREGON George and Pamela Wall 11600 SW Bull Mt. Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal-SDR2001-00008 (Hall Daycare Facility) Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wall: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete on 07/03/2001 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, X 1� / - - _,_ MattleTATSZFOrdelger Assistant Planner is\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00008.accl.doc.dot c: SDR2001-00008 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITY OF TIGARD OREGON January 24, 2001 George Wall 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 Re: Pre-application conference notes Dear George: Your pre-application for daycare services is hereby extended 120 days from February 1 , 2001 . There have been no significant regulation changes at the local level to warrant a new pre-application. Sincerely, 21„.3,0-s4 Richard H. Bewersdorff Planning Manager I:\curpin\dick\G Wall Pre-app.extension.doc c: Pre-application conference notes (1S135AA, Tax Lot 2800/10530 SW Hall Blvd.) 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 TO RICHARD BEWERSDORFF FROM GEORGE WALL RE Pre-app Extension for 1 0530 SW Hall Dated 8/ 1 /00 DATE 1 /24/01 Per our phone conversation of 1 /22/01 , I am requesting a one hundred twenty ( 120) day extension of my pre-app dated 8/ 1 /00. ODOT/Tigard conflict over location of approach, and subsequent engineering required has been part of the delay. New children services' regulations required further engineering changes, and this has added to time delays. Changes in staff at ODOT and Tigard may cause delays. Dwbc., CITY OF TIGARD Alk PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES C.,T ' NoM Community'Dece(oprnen t (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) Shaping A Better Community NON-RESIDENTIAL PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: /'C° STAFF AT PAE-APP: ,TN/e r APPLICANT: LvQl/ AGENT: - Phone: ( ) 6 P?8/ii Phone: ( ) _ PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GEN. LOCATION: /053y SW Mil TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): /S/ 3 S/94 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: S. Dtvc S �e✓elm PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: s fL GI 4 75b S9• fl a t d fr COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: C�/� -P 6.-4/4 err A4/) ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: 'C;37ice LP C.I.T. AREA: FACILITATOR: - PHONE: (503) • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6/00.-)sq. ft. Average lot width: CO ft. Maximum building height: 9- ft. Setbacks: Front 0 ft. Side e/Z° ft. Rear 0/za ft. Corner — ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: $5 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15 %. [Refer to Code Section 18. ] Jib 2° F cd- r-rfed �^- �� 9 vHi. q /e sr dt1.4f Zdts ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060] CTY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page I of 9 NON.Lesidemial Application/Phnaint Dnoioa Section sETBA S �� 1 D REETS: feet from the centerline of Y LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. • FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.730] SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: .- A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; - All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and �� y The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. toJ o [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.B.] N�GI '� �Q n rOO�S In A(a- KING AND ACCESS REQUISED parking for this type of use: yes �/ rh`�r�J�'J –ParkTIg SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): /3 P'441-SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parkingP'441- a•�/1°°' Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: D Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. D Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. [Refer to Code Section 18.765.040] Handicapped Parking: All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: L- ,— Minimum pavement width: ,R_(// All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 and 18305) CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 NON Residential Appl ui on/Pinning Dnuion Section 7-WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS ) ALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.105.030) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) CLEAR VISION AREA The .City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) [RING A SCREENIN REASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be I found in the Development Code. (06 /7'Dt [Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) 0.0A G The REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: /O-2c, feet along north boundary. < feet along east boundary. /o-2c0 feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: APIN STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residentnl Appliahon/PAnnmg Dnision Section ''SIGNS --SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1801 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITARI F FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. - NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERPENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands *eas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of th, applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plan8 submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for e use, protection, or modiffcation of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS ROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.1151 STEEP SLOPES -- When -SrTIEP SLOPES -exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ,5-1m•/.sr NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY[USA]BUFFER STANDARDS,R 8 0 O6 4ce 44,9-A /t/ .z./ LAND DEVELQ M€NT AD JA£ENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitiv area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 25-FEET-WIDE, measured- orizontally, from the defined boundaries of the sensitive area, except where approval has been-granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the corridor. If approval is granted by the Agency or City to reduce the width of a portion of the vegetated corridor, then the surface water in this area shall be directed to an area of the vegetated corridor that is a minimu•• of 25 feet wide. The maximum allowable encroachment shall be 15 feet, except as allowe• Section 3.11.4. No more than 25 percent of the length of the vegetated corridor within the d- -lopment or project site can be less than 25 feet in width. In any case, the average width • he vegetated corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activj -s, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or othe ctivities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided e vegetated corridor, except as allowed below: A GRAVEL WALKWAY OR BIK ATH, NOT EXCEEDING EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. If the walkway or bike path is paved, hen the vegetated corridor must be widened by the width to the path. A paved or gravel walkway or bike path may not be constructed closer than ten (10) feet from the boundary of tijesensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or City. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation; and WATER QUALITY FACILITIES may encroach into the vegetated corridor a maximum of ten (10) feet with the approval of the Agency or City. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3,Design for SWMI CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residentul Apphation/Planning Division Section WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development a onservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identifie n the City of TI and Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonabl economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect signi . ant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and hance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize str mbank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVERLAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE R QUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natural Resources) and the "safe harbor" pr visions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division 23). These provisions require that " ignificant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and protected. The Tualatin River, which s also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual flow less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). • Major streams in Tigard include FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING ST AMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Sum er Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributarie of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: / This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OPT THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). • The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance w. h this chapter. The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this cha ter. ISOLATED ETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian set ack; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Unified Sewerage Agency (U A) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. (Refer to Code Section 18.191.0301 Riparian Setback Reductions The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STREAM RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for "parian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIG LE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determinate n must be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.85.050.C. that demonstr es all of the following: tive plant species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; ➢ he tree canopy currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; ➢ That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.85.050 regulating removal of native plant species; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON Residential Applioion/Plenning Dnuion Section • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. [Refer to Code Section 18.791.100) TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENT A TREE PAN F 1=TTEE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certifteZt car ns shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: • Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; • Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; • Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and • A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.I MITICATIO PLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: • A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. • If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. • If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.E.) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-R,dtnnal Application/PInnmg Dnnion Section NARRATIVE -The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. [Refer to Code Chapter 18.3901 CODE CNAPTE 18.330(Conditional Use) 1 8.620(rgard Mangle Design Standards) (//' 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 1 8.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) 18.350(Planned Development) t/ 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) 18.780(Signs) _ 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 1 8.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) t 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 1 8.720(Design Compatibility Standards) c�18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) Lam_ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) t-r- 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) - 18.798(Wireless Communication Fadlities) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustment) 18.740(Historic Overlay) _- ' 18.810(Street 8 Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupaoon Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) 4/ 18.745(Landscaping 8 Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) - 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 1/'-- 18.520(Commercial Zoning District) ''.---- 18.755(nixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) -- 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ---IMPACTS °°T, __ As.a-15art of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETIN THE APP ANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE --APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. [County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-88841 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Resdennal Application/Planning Dnisian Section BUILDING PERMITS _ LANS" FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). -licant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: 574.Yj (/4 ft)ir)d 4. 44/-0-44/-0— (-a-il ,/- J 4/‹ .p>L C.,, e ,-1 i ,9 riiCLS 7o skicc ph-:_s- )-✓.Cr/ The (7-17.wr-44-7/45.- ZK_g-_e. sih-,-)//-A, PROCEDURE '.-` Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other week days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (ith 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY Of TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Onision Section The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follow,all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard //e9,-. C3 C' . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is iailable from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a .prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: 'J9 , /c4 4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 E-MAIL (staffs first name)@ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commeraal.doc (Engineering section:preapp.eng) Updated: 28-Feb-2000 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Dnuion Se MOO CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: Tc/%A/gri4, Date: 1Q, � 2-c`o 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: (.--= Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes t_ = Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED _ In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): E Vicinity Map Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan EB Existing Conditions Map 9 Preliminary Utilities Plan El Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map E Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan fB--- Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan la'" Site Development Plan Q/Architectural Drawings E3V Landscape Plan ❑ Sign Drawings ®---Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES /g COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: Traffic Study -- 7"k°4 ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis Er— Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/1001200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). i/Sc Ls Vicinity Map i/7sL� rQ ...-//tQ /kn./5 Mme! ,)ViMrH ` Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections ❑ • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area _ ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10%slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6"caliper measured 4'from ground level ❑ Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 • Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map • The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ --y Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ • Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ • Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ • Watercourses ❑ • Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level • The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: • Proposed deed restrictions (if any) U • A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas • The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots n If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel n The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date n • Proposed property lines - ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses LJ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level n All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ • Any applicable deed restrictions U Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable U '- Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ ♦ Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas • Above ground utilities • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s) of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped Cl ♦ Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials _ ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ ♦ Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ • Erosion control measures that will be used Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans n Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) n A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure n Sign Drawings Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ is\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 i r, ' '.I,' f,'-,'; EMPPI CAIO4 toNERENCE NOTE ,,,',...: '. i...,°,:-.„,,,,,,„„; ENNINEERI ETON 4 aNngar ,oral's Community '.'4 xi. #ece ' A Better C PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(s): 1S135 AA Tax Letts): 2800 Use Type: Day Care(Preap#2) The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Hall Boulevard to 45 feet from centerline (dedicate to ODOT). SW to feet SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: ® 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW Hall Boulevard, to include: ® 25 feet of pavement from centerline to curb (or as ODOT otherwise directs) ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 6-foot concrete sidewalk on east side at the property line. ® street trees between future curb and sidewalk, spaced per TDC standards. ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 Engineering Department Section n street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb n storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. J street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities (� -foot concrete sidewalk street trees n street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk J street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement I J concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section Agreement for Future Stree' provements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Hall Boulevard. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Hall Boulevard. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend a new sewer service to the new building. The sewer tap must be covered by a City street opening permit. The roadway work in Hall Boulevard must be covered by an ODOT permit. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone:(503) 642-1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section drainage plan for the site, may be required to prepare a sul isin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit preliminary storm drainage plans with preliminary sizing calculations for the detention facility with the SDR application. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. Contact Gail Curtis with ODOT, 731-8206, or Matt Larsen, 731-4610, regarding the access proposal (see ODOT brochure), and whether or not ODOT will require a traffic study. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 016 Engineering Department Section Pay TIF. Hall Boulevard imf 'ements are eligible for TIF credits. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits. The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section cases where the lc Bey are working on has slopes :xcess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: Ada + tyo GINEERING DE 'ARTMENT STAF Phone: 15031639.4171 Fax: 15031684-7297 i\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng dot.doc Revised: April 21,2000 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) August2000 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 '5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Tuesday, August 01, 2000 8:00 8:30 9:00 George Wall pre-app for daycare (670-7814) 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 1:53PM Friday,July 21, 2000 J George Wall 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 Phone ( 503) 670-7814 RE: Construction of a one-level 4750 square foot building for a day care facility designed for approximately 90 children Property Description : 1S1 35 AA TL 2800 Address: 10534 SW Hall Blvd. Qsestion: Is there anything that can be done to stop the adjoining property from being used as a storage for old houses? ,� --- • County or Washington } ss AFT'LR RECORDING RETURN TO: George E.(Wall ment and Taxation�andLEx-Officio Cony 0,Pamela J. Wall Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received 14237 SW Twekesbury Dr. and recorded in book of records of said Tigard. Oregon 9/224 county. Until a change is requested all tax statements shall be sent to the following r D°/ address: Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation,Ex- same as above Officio County Clerk Doc : 97055661 Escrow No. 3200-17873-MM Rect.: 188450 198.00 Order No. 166702 06/18/1997 09:23:53am WARRANTY DEED - STATUTORY FORM (INDIVIDUAL or CORPORATION) 3 g LINDA M. PRICE, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE IRA W. PRICE AND LINDA M. PRICE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED JUNE 12, 1995; a Grantor, conveys and warrants to GEORGE E. WALL AND PAMELA J. WALL, HUSBAND AND WIFE Grantee, the following described real property free of enrnmhrnnron oxrnhr an nhnrifirnlly 0uct ( V Q The Southerly 96 feet of Lot 2, Block 52, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, in the County of V Washington and State of Oregon. r This instrument will not allow use of the property described in this instrument in violation of applicable land use laws and regulations. Before signing or accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title to the property should check with the appropriate city or county planning department to verify approved uses and to determine any limits on lawsuits against farming or forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. ENCUMBRANCES: 6. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 7. Regulations, including levies, liens, assessments, ri.hts of way, and easements of Tualatin Valley Water District. fr WASHINGTON COUNTY(Continued) REAL AIQAp1TY TRAMPER mw The true consideration for this conveyance is $160,000.00 ) /bo.o o oto/t r'/97 AM BUD :DATE Dated June 12, 1997 ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by orde ,of its board o erectors. yap , 7e. - Lin M. Prirn, Trn^t,r' STATE OF OREGON, County of Washington )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on June 12, , 19 97 , by Linda M. Price, Trustee This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 by as of NULaay ['ubilc Lei ucry..,. My commission [e tpires y a OFFCALSEAL M DOUGAtt ��- U8[NOTARY P ,C-OgEOpr '? �.- coMlAissov ac • I my COMMISSION Exvo-[s JAI'16 t. ' r • FFc.rt, :F I F'7.1- Pt-lEP i C Pir I T i T_E • 3.07-21 10:F_.7 14=-7:7! P.Cr' 0-3 , ( ( NE1/4 NE IM CECTION 35_715 RI* W.M. 7 flerilk- - - - ' .- -'. I IS 1 35A A I • 00034,1•0/7N C3 #"!C0330 • AM 1111011•0110177PIMWMI""M"I .i......4:'"°" f -7- 7,71;T r 1 P ! 3;AA ..'co I ! 4,0 30)I 341 wows'qrre or•• r I . 27,47.•=1.• i 3'1 .1 i ,,i ............. i 1 0 I 1 a,zo.,* • .1 1 .1 11 . 1 ..........---] 1 ; L_______________.______._ l.,•0''...., ! / 302 •IVY II•Irnee.t.s, ,. II 1 spa / If r , •-•:z.,. ! / ----7 .F. 4947 . 7. I ,1 i ./ -• • . ., , -,.,,,-, , m,,, :-• . 0,..1 --,44.g " . I ; f ' t. a : !. . ., . 1.4t) L • .1. ' .i..•-.. ....a.1 .‘ ----40:•." -__-.0 ! I o t' r• ,--......... •.. 51V LOCUST STREET . i,/j 11!ee.■ Til 0 ! hi. ,,,G.,. g .. _ _., , , v'•••• • >I; :i ; ',I ," f • Z '...----- `1 0 leen", i LP 1/ II/. ". (VC , ':9---C7i-'4. •• r: %Its*" r.4 : I ' , ----- , Xe .1 11 • aar' .7 ...104 . 1 - • 11 ,I. ;* ' , . T. .i; . . . #.7 y' ,. • 1 ezi I met ---a. Ifj 3.2.___....: › p 3 -• .----9 I ; Z - -x • :.>7.1 ;IC:1 • ...I r 1W I > X 14••■-------1.■••■, .4. , °Y. - -. --,r ., ' tD 1 400 i• . ------1 : / 23-&4 , 7 07.1Z 1,, ,•-•";';.. -r•-1 ' '-or 717 .0 t L e i PA• E ■T ': Z :u 'E f' '''' j • ,.....,, it i .103 r 70.0 ;1 / 1.20 r ' 23-81 - 7. .,. : m i E ', T 1001 , 1 • T r ' • •/' ,,-7 t•."- --.70.-- I ..._ r1.2,./ : S ••••Clay IECkwn 4 i f. _ .,,L___. ,•. . p--- - -- -- Sgc ma•• .' .." -..1 40 MAPLE LEAF STREET 3 , , 1.1101 ...4..• I I, It 011 'i, 30AS . 1101 19 '5 _, i,. 1 i '-i. •O I-.7rf-.4 .rf 43t. 10S2 '''• 0'- r--- , -■ .1" / ; • Licr I v, 7 o'r - C ,.. ... 1 i ,,, _.,, ..io /, I , •• ........_,!.1-_.42,,,...,/- . i•.. _ IT•e• . II 4331 ' r- -4 ■ , jDØ• ;soot) • •3•47 ' ,..-: •-...- --, r 3 e gs.; ,/ 391, ti) • .1) 1 1 • .1.•.. Pas .. , ,3:-47"---.-.-----1 Z +7Zro;---."--"+"..:--"11111.-' ge • Alsea . 23c3 . . ' Is 014,31 il 002 3E302 • . ///,,<CC(/ VV(‘‘3' • ,... .0 1 i oci...4„, 7,-''''4•1*-4: 1" • 1 ,... : :• ___,„ .!' 11,03 113.3r ir yo434"."11! 'I I 4 ' 4 A. lir '''- "-----1 IV • I 44 __,,,,_,,, rg /41) C. !.? t .---Ir-r -a..-7. • V._-_.L.t_tl_ ...-1.6- ..27 ..... ii 1304 1 LW/ .... ! •11 4„ 1$ • V /4" . A! $ .i'.: B 1,F1 0 ii0 •i< '; ' I r OAK STREET i • , „... ! . • __-....... !genwirz" LL _ ; ..• 'CV.9 4.I J•C4.I, 7 i Val''''"I,. •GallILLLat, _/ . . ...„....../ r se if , I 1 • ■ ..' " 1 °' .... ••• sit ss, 1 t .. het mt.. ' I 4 I use _. . ,, , :•;•,K, X ; witiciterzolli.. ti., ii set ...• sap 04 .rra .. .......,• _12' 4 .4 --- .. , ,;o, ,,3,4 -0 •cra••rat seaway Pusoosts Iwo ...r I ' rs T.c. P 1 i , .• -,. V CS Aar vain(311( r \al 0 • .1 . . ./ ' '7' A :C T .. •. i .4. ..., • _. . . , 3 . 33•0 "b"--"TIGATF : PINE STREET : ts 1 ssaA • Adj. 61 CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevelopment Shaping il Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION IZCAI 1999-00002 FILE TITLE: WALL ANNEXATION APPLICANT: George Wall OWNER: Same 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 REQUEST: The applicant has requested to annex .42 acres of land adjacent to the city limits, into the City of Tigard. LOCATION: 10530 and 10534 SW Hall Boulevard; WCTM 1S134AA, Tax Lot 2800. CURRENT ZONE: Washington County Office Commercial. EQUIVALENT CITY OF TIGARD ZONE: Professional Commercial; C-P. The C-P Zoning District is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and compatible support services. Developments in the C-P zoning district are intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more-intensive commercial and industrial areas. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.320 and 18.390; and Comprehensive Pian Policy 2 (Citizen involvement) and 10 (Urbanization). THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JUNE 29, 1999, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE—NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY—FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY—FIVE CENTS (25c ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER, JULIA POWELL HAJDUK, AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. I I I I / q L y l l � A A [ CITY of TIGARD K!: ,ll��n 1,""- 8_ I--ST I VICINITY MAP III 1111 allarau 1 1 Illin, 1 . r WIMIll II �) P F m al ■ 1JP II ZCA 1999-00002 IIII MA 11 -i '��n SUBJECT WALL UllillisITE e •• ANNEXATION ri / ___I . . 1 0"�`6� awES ■■■ _,- S[ I 8 ,at , •IiiIi '�,"` 10E ST ■ al TRUCE ST .1t IIII 4111110211r■ • , Mill Ai MINIM Ira A I ■ �, =71•111111111111•1111■11111 - ; Iti 47]MI ■ Y lamiiiim. =.,-= no •: City,LeiIII and _ lain:._ �= ,w..,.,.nw,,.,.„ ,,,,. ,.,.,n«w.19 Til iiiirmVill I N_-: ■_ i mwa o.w,n.a 1312$.OR 07223 F • f FF=t1 :FIFcT At1EF R J r; '. _ -?=1.1 7-_1 -- 10:Se i72_ F.04 0-7 '' ''' te ¶ SOP 0 f •i • 1 011) • 1 1 1 , : .. kii . 1 i • 1 . 2 44 122 r • . , . ' 52 ,1, .„, . . . . .. . • . : • 41 . I .ill i ow: 35 00 33GO de 1 3 .4 • .4 r �. •311 411P0 1 • ! .. w . , . .. . 0 r 3 4 0 0 pi. . 0 la, 3219 A • N 0 . . 11:111111r ■ $ 4 I . ie '." $ v: 0 ,t 1 - 6 e .. s 1 L k .--,7-7--.,47 r - 4 , . $GA4 ; i '. 2o' <____ ?‘ _ , 7i ot'(4,2_Ty 4 VP l ost o S A) NAzz t4ALi yAR-o �D/ I I 9 � vAre Ai y G 47lb ° 7- ,0 .y c.--,,,z a:: 4.. l7O ,-, 1 1 ,,, 1-----1 ..--'1 1 i f,C-s' PAR k)NG ° 3/ ,--.1 8 o i YC 041,[ - 1 _._ J_ _ 3v/._-__._._ :Pit LJAL AZ I/ALL 171vp: Customer Receipt CITY OF TIGARD Printed:07/21/2000 14:00 User: front Station: 02 Operator: kjp Rcpt No: 0003874 Date: 07/21/2000 Customer No:000000 Amount Due: 240.00 Name: George Wall Cash: 0.00 Address: 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road Check: 240.00 Tigard, OR 97224 N/A 0.00 Change: 0.00 Type Description Amount landus Land Use Applications 240.00 CIL e- (,) ("1, • 08/10/00 15:41 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS 002%004 . t - 31 .E � � *A. � Department of-Transportation°� Region 1 •�. y � 123 NW Flanders � >; John A Kitzhuber.MD.,cov,-rnor Po►'t1And,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 FILE CODE. August 10, 2000 PlA9-1-2A-TIG-141 Proposal Number. 752 City of Tigard Planning Division • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,'OR '97223 Attn7 Brian Rager Subject: Pre-application for George Wall Day Care Dear Mr. Rager: The site of the proposed land use action is adjacent to State Highway Number 144 (Hall Boulevard) According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999) Hall Boulevard is classified as a District Urban highway facility. The speed limit at this location along Hall Boulevard is 40 miles per hour. Given this speed and classification, the access spacing standard for this portion of Hall Boulevard is 500 ft and the mobility standard volume to capacity ratio is .95. 000T has permitting authority for this facility (OAR 734-015)1 and an interest in ensuring that this proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to build a 4750 sq. ft daycare for a maximum of 80 children We understand that the duplex that currently occupies the site would be torn down and replaced with the daycare facility. This proposal represents a "change of use"2 and therefore the applicant will need to apply for a new approach permit from ODOT. We understand that the applicant will seek direct access to Hall Boulevard from a private approach. Given the location of the site and the adjacent property uses, this approach will not meet 0001 spacing standards. A minor deviation will be required for the applicant to receive an approach permit. The minor deviation must be applied for as part of the approach permit. It is anticipated that the applicant will be able to satisfy the minor deviation approval criteria3, particularly with the provision for a crossover access easement provided between the subject property and either one of the adjacent properties to the north or south. When the selected property to the north or south redevelops, provisions for a shared . t See the ODOT web site for the exact language of OAR 734-051: http://www.odor.state.or.us/tdb/planning/access mgt/ado pted_rules/oregon administrative rules.htm `OAR 73,-051-0110 OAR 731-051-0310 term 7H-1850 11/981 08/10/00 15:42 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS V1003/004 2 ODOT Response 08/10/00 Page Page 2 George Wall Day Care City of Tigard approach with the applicant's property will be in place.4 We understand that the sidewalks along the site's Hall Boulevard frontage are substandard and.will need to be brought up to current ODOT and ADA standards as a part of the approach permit and site development approval. We also understand that the City-of Tigard has plans to widen and improve Hall Boulevard in the future, which will require the dedication of right-of-way along this facility. In order far the applicable ODOT approval criteria to be addressed, we will request that the following requirements be included as conditions of approval: 1) An OIDOT approach permit must be obtained prior to building permit issuance. 2) The applicant has the following options: A. Establish a crossover easement for access to Hall Boulevard with orue of the adjacent properties, or B. Locate the site's approach road in such a way that when an adjacent property redevelops it can use the applicant's approach as a shared approach. 3) The ipplicant shall improve the sidewalks along its frontage of OR 8 to ODOT/ADA standards. 4) The applicant will dedicate right-of-way as stipulated by the City-of Tigard for future improvements to Hall Boulevard. The following is ODOT permit information for the applicant: 1) Any work in the right-of-way will require an ODOT permit. 2) An application for an ODOT drainage permit must be completed if the site's drainage enters ODOT's right-of-ways. A preliminary drainage plan of the site will be required if A. Total peak runoff entering ODOT's right of way is greater than 0.05 cubic meters per second, or a. The improvements create an increase in impervious surface area by greater than 1,000 square meters. 3) Contact Joel McCarroll, Assistant District Manager, ODOT District 2A, at 503- 229-5267 for information on the written application process. OAR 734-051-0210 5 OAR 734-051-0160 08/10/00 15:42 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS 0004/004 • ODOT Response Page 3 George Wall Day Care 08/10/00 City of Tigard If you have any questions regarding the above comments, I can be reached at 503-731-46 T0. Thank yoiJ for providing ODOT with the opportunity to comment on this pre, application proposal. Sincerely. 17 / ✓J Matthew Larsen Development Review pc: Joel McCarroll, ODOT Chi Mai, ODOT George Wall, Applicant 08/10/00 15:41 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS 10 001/004 • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 123 NW FLANDERS PORTLAND , OR 97209 - 4037 ( 503 ) 731 -8200 FAX ( 503 ) 731 - 8259 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO FROM: Mi��- L arStoisk. COMPANY: C; O T+'a ac ( DATE: awi 10 2000 J FAX NUMBER: 24 01 SZ.. TOTAL NO.OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: • PHONE NtTh ER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: e t,",5 4. (AA R Ob j Cart..' YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: ❑URGENT ❑FOR REVIEW ❑PLEASE COMMENT ❑PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE_ NOTES/COMMENTS: /Uple 7//f/e/ -freyk. i' ( - &&½ i U (// - 670- 7f/5/ /-ci« Pia41,15 Pf f osei le ClaA4 fins r cio3a. /z( 02 /' 510(044 /.vL fn4/;‘.., S'dewjlc Yaf Diu 1 Parisic<< 5ei' 'cdc - 20{f (4,42, , `` (`0,7 Jr 4-I j,,,,,\,(- - - ( cr ao) Nil /5 COM att4 CCe r\k Z C Cs 0 Yu) kykfc-,t, C/0(;ikir I1 wide yo/h wlit / /v/ �v (oft eihec.cle *7i6-14- ( t-0 (.O6)r 91_ --5-"CJ te_2. X 7Y-V th/ yfri: _07ary---T?W. (7 r1;777 :/ /2/ --9 J2T •ei 2- ' r') 5(.5 +7 --V-7 ( i1-4W — <1_14 _1 -t7I •---;2" c23 -c_e-tf4 --t/.3-77773'70/ c2: py --9 j-71' / e C9 efl -fr` Ci -V ,(") -2/ --/_1(2 s frW" c57 7111 2I q LJ i-v_f 7 ce-st-7/-,e,Z( - 00( C -v(71 iT --t{ - ' 7'1(5 Q.S -31Zr-gP 5Hrd7 4/ Z / /Q ) 116r C2 $77b /77— -7177 -4,/"P •1,0 Xer c-or-i7Z--=-7cT-5.-115"E / / 77 -frw r-747 hf7 V7/- 3r i-Pd-ter TO 39Vd 11VM 398339 T6E9PZ9EOS TO:O0 9661/10/80 08/01/19'35 00: 01 5035246391 GEORGE WALL PAGE 02 - _ - - -,•••••••••,••••••••••••■••••■•■•■••••••■•• ••••,•■■ ••••• 11 =1J. _ _77k -4C ‘--.44r2-h>;it/6- DIA - __ .5 Z., CO 77b ,0 ALP ; <J4 s 6._p• 17:6- _ A _ /Tv _ . 6._ A- _ / . . . ,ze)7.776_ 42.) 67-5 „. . _ S . A Ve,-%2 tcc _fi. ■•••■••••••■.ea ■•• • 24:_p ?2.4._X. . Zn.11/2_71A, _ _ /Zr5".- IC? // P ? • ---• 08/01/1995 00:01 5035246391 GEORGE WALL PAGE 03 te- _c Kr e4tc ie< r- A2L rh, /5- Z-0 74-- 7 ,_co 4.4--.5 pr /2ry-4.4 r- r Alit 7--6 /-r- _A/ 407-A k"- -- G.) •. :Att/_ e-- C-1- b 50e:i).‘ce 7-3 / f_4r_6,1`?" 1r) ,LL P rA. A-14- q-'11 zr ifi .•49- 4-4) v z--vieo ;244 r222 ■2-- 2_ 08/01/1995 00:01 5035246391 GEORGE WALL PAGE 04 /1 It e s q-z- _ ? _A7 __ 2>etel_ P_ZIS a_ 2 --_/2.7,2_-__-_24/ • eoesoe.c‘ee: IJ ; 1--- c zt-C ._,Ot-cr- SD 432 ; 5 ,AT.A‘ ,t1) C-4-0 . .77-7 _ 4605 _ . . _ ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Letter of Transmittal City of Tigard DATE RECEIVED RECEIVED \;AY 2 4 2002 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING TO: <� S Cjil‘(eje3 Y DEPT: ?_L CJ r ` FROM: LCOS-9 PHONE NUMBER: S03 - Co70 -icr I (4 RE: D 5DR(fro( - ( s (Case number, site a ess, parcel number, etc.) COMMENTS: Nt0 d (-RciHa' o- i:dstsforms\LetterTraT1Smitta1.dOC 07/31/01 6/25/02 Notes for Case #: SDR2001-00008 9:58:16 AM Notes No water quality or quantity SDC's on this one. OK for issuance of SIT permit. OK for issuance of SIT Permit and building permit. OK for Building permit. OK to remove 34-inch tree on the east side of property. Jeff Wall has submitted a letter from a certified arborist stating that the tree will be severely impacted by development. Mr. Wall has submitted a mitigation plan for the tree which has been approved by the City Arborist. George Wall has requested a modification to the site which can be found in the file. the request is to move the concrete sidewalk against the building and move the 5-foot landscaped area away from the building. • Page 1 of 1 I /.== L V .. _� MAINItNANLL 1. - x —. � _J..a_) - GATE S 88 36 45 E 190.32 ----- i CROSS ,ER EASEMENT �i x X x —�- •I x �-- - FL._ - o + 6.00 . �� (.115.32_AF_TER_DEDICA_TION) •,_.__,, _-__ __ 1 _.-. I 1 16" TYPE "C" �� - 8" CMU WAi ' : CURB, TYP co Jr T ,--- PRECAST WHEELSTOPS �' h0 Q ,' o / 1:.. ..., ....PINNED TO PAVERS Q- �-1 `° L d� it �"�'" I I // cV CJ UU�v�� r / ROOF OU TL .. L I �N� Z ` X Cf ‘4C- W ta TYPICAL L . - ACCESSIBLE _ ; I / GRAPHIC PER r I i DEMO EXISTING C, 1,_ — ACCESSIBLE / DUPLEX STRUCTURE i DETAIL 2/C4 . � 9 PARKING SIGN PER _ I _ 1/C4 MOUNTED ON I r V COLUMN n' :_ ' - - r loo , � 1 6 WHITE 1 rn r L / . A STRIPES I I // / ' s /4 •�i7 G, 04-,/�G--�i r7 / • ' : ' ► g ' • ; ® I; .. : • • : 01 ( r roc/t-/ ' r� e�C � vvl- v0.3� s -- I 1. , , .. S �ICII� G /�<J - - <<. • •1 i. r ISEIILDING /: • ?..4. 18.150 23.98 18.50 1 r _ 5, 029 S.F. I 1 (Q I i it c 7'76- I . .-----1--7 3) ,q- 4) A- 1-/4./ /t 0/2-6-A. 1 24.80 c °0 ± NEW CONCRETE - .'•. 4 I / /, } 80 Qom, + PAVERS FOR ' ' I 7 A/•<0 _s' -AO9j0 4 7 . 1i�/i<<J I NEW SITE LIGHT POROUS PAVEMENT'__..-I NEW SIGN I SEE 3/C4 - . '' , • ; 1 4 to A-y =/-2 v .1'� �7ti,1 /,)/;t 7C •-,.5'A / I O 1 . C: . • I G- /-cam•7`-i Al )/1 G• �'��i�!/i`-d 0 i'c' /47,:,;_..-..1 . \`\�� ,... - � INTERIOR ql A 5 `� ' I ILLUMINATED • MONUMENT SIGN I tJ I 4 WHITE / ,"' STRIPES -• -... • At 4 t t _ —_- — _ — 1 � k t. • SHARED ACCESS " ' 4 . • , `, 6" NEW CONCRETE EASEMENT .• . . ', ,'1. a. •i•. ''- • 4o. • MAINTENANCE X 4 ' t)p A r,,1h, PLAY AREA RECEIVED APRON (BROOM I GATE 3 8.78 16.00 FINISH) `I" `- 9 BIKE N RACK CMU WALL 10" WIDE MAY 12n02 O BSCURING TRASH BASE W/ 8" UPPER `t- CITY OFTIGARD RICH SIGH LIFT PLANNING/ENGINEERING O DEMO EXISTING WALL (175.32' AFTER DEDICATION) ENCLOSURE 10'x8' ..-....=::::===:::=1 r 8" L.._._-............. r. •'_.._ �','.�' ...rte'� ... .. ..... . ......0 ........ �. - 8 CMU WALL :x. N 88'36'45"W 190.32' ....._ 27.00 '30.00 -_ 26.6/ I - 1YP. - - ---- - -- _•! 146.67 _ Alr*Il/ C'I A TTC-fl C/ rf•A I/•`!- fl A I ttC(*A7t5 JiA1 -01 -02 12 : 36P Dan . Symons , P. E . ( 50 762- 1962 P .01 S.DkJ-odl - MVO g SYMON S 12805 S.E.Foster Road ENGINEERING Portland, OR 97236 CONSI-i TANTS,Inc. (503) 760-1353 fax 762-1962 OBSERVATION REPORT No. 3 PROJECT: George Wall Day Care PROJECT No: 20042 10530 SW Hall Boulevard SIT2001-00024 Tigard, Oregon WEATHER: Sunny DATE: July 1, 2002 CONTACTED: Jeff Wall BY: Michael Joy OBSERVATIONS: i) The outlet riser of the pollution control manhole has been properly installed tv:th the debris collar attached. The second orifice has been drilled at the appropriate height and diameter. 2) The side and rear area drains have been installed. The landscaping work is in progress for spreading the wood chips at the rear yard. RECOMMENDATIONS OR CONCLUSIONS: A) The site work appears to meet the intent of the project plans and specifications. Symons Engineering Consultants Inc. approves the project as acceptable. Structural Observation does not include or waive the responsibility_;or the inspections required by UBC Section 108 (Building Official), 1701 (Special Inspections)or other sections of the code. Site visits by the Engineer-of-Record for visual observation of the structural system for general compliance to the approved plans and specifications does not constitute an inspection of every detail, nor does it guarantee that all deficiencies will be revealed, Contractor is responsible for the .structure being completed in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and modifications. _-,_- CC: Jeff Wall (fax: 503-624-0882) Hap, City of Tigard (fax: 503-624-3681) a • W28/2002 FRI 10: 39 FAX 503 - , 6058 Z001/001 w '(f = Oregon Department of Transportation • •t-1!1 SW Westgate DrIVE,Ste 350 • ',-,n Ki.n, :•..+.IG,c:.- Portland.,OR 97221-2414 (503)229-5002 1 AX (503)297-6055 . FILE CODE; June 28, 2002 INSPECTION LETTER Sorrento Day Care, Inc 11600 SW Bull Mt. Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 Subject: Permit 2AM37661 permit for sidewalk, curb, pavement and utility connection. Dear George Wall: This letter confirms my findings of the site inspection on June 27, 2002 for the above referenced project. You are advised as follows: ( ) The following variances from the permit provisions were noted and arrangements must be made to correct the facility in accordance with ORS 374.320. ( X ) Project has been completed substantially in conformance with the permit provisions and no further work is necessary. ( ) The facilities have not been constructed. Up to a one year extension may be granted upon written request. Arrangements must be made within 30 days. Failure to reapply shall be cause for cancellation of the permit. ( ) The completion date was previously extended for one year. This permit is canceled. If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 229-5002 x226. S ncerel _ 41-7\..›t0.- \c------- m ustin Shoemaker Permit Specialist A IIII JUL-02-02 TUE 07:48 AN 4 P. 01 f La VIELLE GEOIECHNIC:4L P.C. :313 NE Alameda Portland, Oregon 9721 003, 257-0511, Fax 282-7(71 July 1, 2002 Our ref: 02-1675.001 George Wall Construction 11600 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 RE: CONSTRUCTION MONITORENG DAYCARE 10540SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OREGON Dear Sir: We have observed the retaining wall construction and backfilling, and the placement and compaction of the small volumes of fill beneath floors and pavements at the Daycare at SW Hall & Oak, Tigard, Oregon. The retaining wall has been constructed in accordance with the design and the geotechnical recommendation. All of the backfill and fills have been placed and compacted in accordance with the project's plans and specifications. We appreciate this opportunity to he of service. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, LaVIELLE GLO? CHATICAL, P.C. CIaVie/ :s` `27-90 ` . eA1D i2-31-02 Craig C. LaVielle, P.E., Principal 5& - V AMMEMMEMEMEM DATE: Aug 7, 2001 —1 PLANS CHECK NO. PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE HALL DAY CARE FACILITY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE. TAX MAP NO.. SITES NO.ADDRESS: LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $226.00 BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $207.00 ESTIMATED TIF INDUSTRIAL $217.00 X INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. INSTITUTIONAL ONLY DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 565 Day Care Center TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE 67.00 6.15 BASIS: Applicant proposed construction of 5,035 Sq. Ft. Day care center. CALCULATIONS: Wk day Wk end RATE TIF = ( ( Avq. trips X 5) + ( Avq. trips X 2) X T.G.S.F. ) – Credit X PER TRIP 7 $21,592 = (( 67 X 5) + (6.15 X 2) X 5.035) –20 X $94 7 TRANSIST AMT. $3,910 = 230 = TRIP GEN X 17 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 230 FEE: $21,592 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: 20 trip credit applied for removal of a residential duplex ROAD AMT. $17,682 TRANSIT AMT $3,910 PREPARED BY S.S. Casper I:TIFWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 Oregu Dcpronentalli"sporos on 'LICATION AND PERMIT TO OCCUPY PERMIT NUMBER PEo.- _AM OPERATIONS UPON A STATE HIG'.o/AY See Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 734, Division 55 GENERAL LOCATION PURPOSE OF APPLICATION (TO CONSTRUCT/OPERATE/MAINTAIN) HIGHWAY NAME AND ROUTE NUMBER POLE TYPE MIN.VERT.CLEARANCE Beaverton - Tualatin Hwy (Hall Blvd) LINE HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY BURIED TYPE 141 34 = WASHINGTON CABLE BETWEEN OR NEAR LANDMARKS PIPE TYPE Near Oak Street LINE HWY. REFERENCE MAP DESIGNATED FREEWAY IN U.S. FOREST Strait line map YES X NO YES X NO NON-COMMERCIAL SIGN APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONS AND/OR Sorrento Day Care, Inc. X FACILITIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW 11600 SW Bull Mt. Rd. BOND REQUIRED REFERENCE: AMOUNT OF BOND Tigard, OR. 97224 [R] YES NO OAR 734-55 035(2) $2,000.00 INSURANCE REFERENCE: SPECIFIED COMP.DATE Attn. George Wall Tel: (503)670-7814 n oaR 734-55 YES NO 035(1) 04/30/2002 DETAIL LOCATION OF FACILITY(For more space attach additional sheets) MILE MILE ENGINEERS ENGINEERS SIDE OF HWY OR DISTANCE FROM BURIED CABLE OR PIPE SPAN POINT TO POINT STATION TO STATION ANGLE OFCROSSING CENTER OF PVMT R/W LINE DEPTHNERT. SIZE AND KIND LENGTH 4.30 4.32 180+76 181 +71 R DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF NON-COMMERCIAL SIGNS OR MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONS FACILITIES This permit will include sidewalk, curb, pavement, utility connection SPECIAL PROVISIONS(FOR MORE SPACE ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS) TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED - OPEN CUTTING OF PAVED OR SURFACED AREAS ALLOWED? 1 X YES IOAR 734-55-025(6)] NO 2 YES[OAR 734-55-100(21 X NO (OAR 734-55-100(1) 3 AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK,THE APPLICANT OR HIS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE AT TELEPHONE NUMBER: 503-229-5002 OR FAX A COPY OF THIS PAGE TO THE DISTRICT OFFICE AT: 503-297-6058 SPECIFY TIME AND DATE IN THE SPACE BELOW. 4 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF COMPLETION POSTCARD SHALL BE SIGNED AND RETURNED TO THE DISTRICT OFFICE. 5 A COPY OF THIS PERMIT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE WORK AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6 ORS 757.54 TO 757.571 REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.YOU MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR DAMAGES.CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES.CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. 1.800-332-2344 COMMENTS: 1- All work shall comply with this permit and the attached 3 pages of provisions, and approved plans to the satisfaction of ODOT. 2- Any work not in compliance shall be removed, repaired to meet ODOT current specifications. 3- Applicant shall call 503-969-1034 for any electrical locates within ODOT's right-of-way prior to starting any work. 4 A preconstruction conference is required before start1'tt work. Please call 503-229:5002(E Miller)tio arranAa for a m eting. 5- A permanent recorded cross over easement to the adfatent property, shall be submitted to DOT prior to s£arting work. IF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION WILL AFFECT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, THE APPLICANT SHALL ACQUIRE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE BEFORE ACQUIRING THE DISTRICT MANAGER'S SIGNATURE. LOCAL GO ERN T O L SIGNATURE TITLE 4� �n�• DATE X 3—..,tW V 1.4,541 th1Ltv--_ e ze 1c71 APPLICA APPLICATION DATE TITLE TELE HONE NO. X When this application is approved by the Department,the applicant is subisct to,accepts and appra®ISTRICT MANAGER OR REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL DATE the terns and provisions contained and attached:and the terns of Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 734,Division 55,which is by this reference made a part of this permit. X 7343457(9-96) GE. JRAL PROVISIONS FOR PO-_,LINE, PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS APPLICANT George Wall Construction HIGHWAY 141 MP 4.30 to 4.32 WORKSITE Ell. Applicant must call for utility locates before digging(1-800-332-2344). You may be held liable for damages. Pre-marking of excavation areas is required. E12. Applicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site.They shall be available to the District Maintenance manager or representative at their request. 03. Contractor to acknowledge receipt of and review of, the Oregon Administrative Rules(Chapter 734-55)governing miscellaneous facilities and operations on the highway right of way as the governing provisions of this permit or agreement. E14. Access control fence must be maintained during construction and restored to its original or better condition after constmction is complete. 05. The permitte shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. 06. The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any busines transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. 07. All grass and small brush within the work area shall be rotary or flail mowed to ground level prior to the beginning of work to facilitate clean up. Disturbed areas shall be reseeded with grass native to the area in an appropriate seeding time. Q8. The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean up shall be at the applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each work day, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. 09. Pcrmittcc shall replace any landscape vegetation or fences that are destroyed. Any damage that is not fully recovered within 30 days(weather permitting)shall be replaced by ODOT at the expense of the permittee. A"plant establishment" shall be understood to be part of the planting work to assure satisfactory growth of planted materials. The plant establishment period will begin when the original planting and all landscape construction has beer completed and approved. The length of the establishment period will be one calendar year or as defined in the Special Provisions. ❑10. Applicant will install and maintain landscaped area as shown on the attached drawings. Planting shall be limited to low growing shrubs, grass or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in any direction. The Commission or Engineer shall have the right to remove said landscaping at any time such removal may appear to the Commission to be in the public interest, without liability or loss,injury,or damage or any nature whatsoever. TRAFFIC E111. The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. All traffic contre devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. E112. Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each phase of the work, showing signs and cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative in advance of construction or maintenance. Online Traffic control hand book (http:/www.odot.state.or.usitstrafmgtpublic/publicat.htm) 013. All damaged or removed highways signs shall be replaced by the applicant. Installation shall be according to MUTCD standards or District Manager's specification,and shall be completed as soon as possible no later than the end of the work shift. E114. No lane restrictions will be permitted on the roadway during the hours of 6:00 AM and 9:00 AM,or 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM (Monday thru Friday)without prior authorization of the District Manager or representative. ❑15. Hours of work shall be between Dawn to Dusk Monday thru Thrusday and dawn to 12:01 PM on Friday. APPLICANT ODOT REP DATE DRAINAGE El 16. On site storm drainage shall be controlled within the applicant's property. No blind connections to existing state facilities. ❑17. Excavation shall not be done on the ditch slopes. Trench excavation shall either be at ditch bottom or outside the ditch area. (Minimum depth at bottom of ditch-36", minimum depth at the outside of ditch-42") 018. Only earth or rock shall be used as fill material and shall slope so as not to change or adversely affect existing drainage. Fine grade and seed the finished fill with native grasses to prevent erosion. O 19. A storm drainage study will be required by a registered engineer meeting the standards of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) when any of the following conditions apply: Whenever a 4" pipe is inadequate to serve the developed area, development site is 1 acre or larger it size and directly or indirectly affects state facilities,or as directed by the District Manager or representative. 020. An advance deposit of$ (Order to Render Service) is required for ODOT Hydraulics Engineer(Bridge Section)to review and approve storm study calculations. O 21. You will be required to provide"on site" retainage for storm water run off that exceeds that of undeveloped site. ❑22 Storm drainage study shall be a 10 year, 25 year, 50 year, 100 year, other. O 23. All water discharged to an ODOT drainage system will be treated prior to discharge. All requests for connection to an ODOT storm sewer will meet any requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System that could include: local jurisdiction approval of on site water quality treatment facilities, development of an operation and maintenance plan for any on site water quality treatment facility as determined by local jurisdiction. EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION 024. Open cutting of pavement shall only be allowed in areas specifically approved by District Manager or representative. 025. Trench backfill shall be according to the attached typical drawing,marked as Exhibit A 026. Open cutting of the highway will be allowed with construction in accordance with OAR 734-55-100. All excavation in paved areas shall be backfilled and the roadway surface patched before the end of each shift. In special cases where steel plates are allowed, said plates shall be pinned and a temporary cold patch applied to the edges.The permittee shall be fully responsible for monitoring and maintenance of temporary patching and steel plating. O 27. Compaction test will be required for each open cut per ODOT Standard specification for Highway Construction.Tests shall be conducted every 50 LF per each Lift of a continuous trench by standard AASHTO T99 method A. At the discretion of the District Manager or representative, results of such test shall be provided to District Manager or representative at applicants'expense. 028. Control Density Fill(CDF)shall be used as surface back fill material in place of crushed rock in open trenches that affect the travel portions of the highway. A M"-0 rock will be used for the aggregate. The amount of concrete used shall not exceed 3% of the total mixture's weight. Maximum compressed strengths must not exceed 100-150 psi. 029. Surface restoration shall be a minimum of 6" of hot AC,or match existing AC depth,compacted in 2" lifts,whichever is greater. 030. All rock shall be from an ODOT Certified material source. 031. Any area of cut or damaged asphalt shall be restored in accordance with the attached"T" type drawing. For a period of 2 years following the patched paved surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches,and during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representative satisfaction any of the patches which become settled,cracked,broken,or otherwise faulty. APPLICANT ODOT REP DATE 32. An overlay to seal an open cut area s, oe completed prior to the end of the construction won,or when minimum temperature allows per ODOT Standard specification for Highway Construction. Typical overlay shall be 1 'h" deep and cover the affected area from edge of pavement to edge of pavement,and taper longitudinally 50' : 1". Taper may be adjusted by the District Manager as required. For a period of two years following this patching of the surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches,and during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representative's satisfaction any of the patches which become settled,cracked,broken or otherwise faulty. 033. Highway crossing shall be bored or jacked. Bore pits shall be located behind ditch line or in areas satisfactory to the District Office. Unattended pits shall be protected by a 6-foot fence or shall be backfilled or steel plated and pinned. 034. Applicant shall install a"tracer wire" or other similar conductive marking tape or device,if installing any non-conductive,unbeatable underground facility, to comply with the Oregon Utility Notification Center, One Call System(per OAR 952-01-0070(6). 035. Trench backfill outside of ditch line or in approved areas can be native soil compacted at optimum moisture in 12" layers to 90% or greater of the maximum density. 036. Native material found to be unsatisfactory for compaction shall be disposed of off the project,and granular backfill used. 037. Trench backfill in rock slope or shoulder shall be crushed 1"-0 or Y4"-0 size rock compacted at optimum moisture in 12" layers to 95% of maximum density by standard AASHTO T99 method. 038. Where excavation is on fill slope steeper than 2:1 slope protection shall be used with 4"size rock laid evenly to a minimum depth of 12" 039. No more than 300' of trench longitudinally along the highway shall be LEFT open at any one time and no trench shall be left in an open conditioi overnight. 040. Areas of disturbed cut and fill slopes shall be restored to a condition suitable to the District Manager or representative. Areas of erosion to be inlaid with an acceptable rip rap material. 041. All underground utilities shall be installed with a 3' or more clearance from existing or contract plans guardrail post and attachments. All non- metallic water, sanitary and storm sewer pipe shall have an electrically conductive insulated 12-guage copper tracer wire the full length of the installed pipe using blue wire for water and green for storm and sanitary sewer piping. 042. Any area of cut or damaged concrete shall be restored in accordance with the attached Typical Section-Pipe Section under sidewalk. 043. Signs and pedestals shall be placed as near the highway right-of-way line as practical. In no case shall pedestals and line markers be located withi the highway maintenance area. 044. No cable plowing is allowed within the lateral support of the highway asphalt(i.e. at 6'lower than the edge of the asphalt, no plowing with 9'of the edge of the asphalt). 045. All pipe and bridge attachment hardware shall be submitted to the ODOT Operations Structural Coatings Coordinator for approval. 046. Expansion joints of an ODOT approved type to be located in the closed proximity with the expansion joints of the structure. ODOT Bridge Offrci Practice Manual attached. 047. Adhesive anchors only are acceptable for support brackets. For a list of acceptable adhesive anchors or more information, see the ODOT Bridge Office Practice Manual. 048. Field drilled holes in the stiffeners and areas damaged by drill shall be painted with two coats of zinc-rich primer prior to assembly. Methods sha be approved by ODOT Operations Structural Coatings Coordinator. 049. Neoprene gaskets to be placed between the mounting plates and stiffeners. ODOT Bridge Office Practice Manual attached. 050. Plans are approved in general only and does not relieve the applicant from completing the construction improvements satisfactory to ODOT. Fiel changes may be required by the District Manager or representative. When revisions are made in the field,as built drawings will be submitted to the Distrie Office. APPLICANT ODOT REP DATE 10/22/01 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2001-00008 12:20:45 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 HALF ST. IMPROVEMENTS/HALL 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform the half-street improvement in SW Hall Boulevard. The improvement shall be constructed to the ODOT interim standard,with a pavement width of 25 feet from centerline to curb. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide,to meet City standards. A copy of the ODOT permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 0001 ADDTL. ROW/HALL 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit,additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon,by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division,along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information,contact Rick Reeves,Oregon Department of Transportation,Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland,OR 97209-4037; Phone 731-8461). 0001 COMPLETE WORK IN PUBLIC ROW 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 17. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way(or public easement)and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 0001 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 18. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,the amount will be$2,640.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 0001 PVT.WATER QUALITY FACILITY 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 19. To ensure compliance with CleonWater Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility(paver system)for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins,Building Division. Page 2 of 2 10/22/01' Conditions Associated with Case #: SDR2001-00008 12:20:45 PM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 ACCESS EASEMENT 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 1. Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. 0001 PROPOSED WALKWAY 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 2. Provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. 0001 ACCESS EASEMENT-NORTH 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 3. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. 0001 FENCE 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 4. Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link,the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. 0001 GROUND COVER 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 5. Provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line,and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. 0001 MIXED SOLID WASTE 0 Not Met MS 9/11/01 ST 6. Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4 methods of compliance for Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. 0001 MIX.SOLID WASTE DESIGN STD. 0 Not Met MS 9/11/01 ST 7. Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards(Section 18.755.050.C). 0001 WHEEL STOPS 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 8. Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. 0001 BICYCLE RACK 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 9. Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. 0001 SIGN PERMIT 0 Not Met MS 9/11/01 ST 10. Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. 0001 TREES 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 11. Provide a plan showing all trees on the site,the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement) 0001 STREET OPENING PERMIT 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover a possible connection to the sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard. If no new lateral is required,then no permit is needed. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. (NOTE: Applicant found that a 4-inch sewer lateral presently serves the existing home. No new lateral is needed. Therefore, no permit required from COT). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. (NOTE: See note at end of Condition#12). 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 9/10/01 DCP 9/11/01 DCP 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). Paid Receipt#2001-3685 Page 1 of 2 10/23/01 Conditions I ociated with Case #: SDR2 -00008 10:12:22 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 ACCESS EASEMENT 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 1. Provide evidence that an access easement has been recorded for the property to the south. 0001 PROPOSED WALKWAY 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 2. Provide a plan showing the proposed walkway clearly marked with pavement markings. 0001 ACCESS EASEMENT-NORTH 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 3. Provide an access easement with the adjoining property to the north to ensure future parking lot connections. 0001 FENCE 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 4. Provide information on the type of fence to be used. If the fence to be used is chain link,the applicant must fit the fence with slats to increase the screening of the facility. 0001 GROUND COVER 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 5. Provide a plan showing the type of ground cover to be planted along the northern property line,and the western property line landscaped with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The applicant must also show the proposed 6-foot fence to extend the length of the proposed retaining wall along the southern property line. 0001 MIXED SOLID WASTE 0 Met MS 10/23/01 MAS 6. Provide a narrative addressing the criteria of one of the 4 methods of compliance for Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage and submit a sign-off letter regarding the location of the facility. 0001 MIX.SOLID WASTE DESIGN STD. 0 Met MS 10/23/01 MAS 7. Provide a narrative addressing the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage Design Standards(Section 18.755.050.C). 0001 WHEEL STOPS 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 8. Provide a plan showing all 13 parking stalls to be provided with wheel stops according to Section 18.765.040.J. 0001 BICYCLE RACK 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 9. Provide a plan that shows a 9-stall bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. 0001 SIGN PERMIT 0 Not Met MS 9/11/01 ST 10. Apply for a sign permit through a separate process administered by the Development Services Technicians. 0001 TREES 0 Met MS 10/22/01 MAS 11. Provide a plan showing all trees on the site,the size of the trees and which ones are to be removed. The applicant will submit an arborist report for the protection and removal for any tree over 12 inches in diameter and submit a mitigation program according to Section 18.790.030. (Tree Plan Requirement) 0001 STREET OPENING PERMIT 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 12. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Street Opening Permit will be required for this project to cover a possible connection to the sewer main in SW Hall Boulevard. If no new lateral is required,then no permit is needed. The applicant will need to submit five(5)copies of a proposed public improvement plan for review and approval. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include information relevant to the public improvements. (NOTE: Applicant found that a 4-inch sewer lateral presently serves the existing home. No new lateral is needed. Therefore, no permit required from COT). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 13. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. (NOTE: See note at end of Condition#12). 0001 ADDRESSING FEE 0 Met 9/10/01 DCP 9/11/01 DCP 14. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$30.00. (STAFF CONTACT: Kit Church, Engineering). Paid Receipt#2001-3685 Page 1 of 2 10/23/01 Conditions ociated with Case #: SDR2 -00008 10:12:22 AM Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 HALF ST. IMPROVEMENTS/HALL 0 Met 10/18/01 BDR 10/19/01 BDR 15. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform the half-street improvement in SW Hall Boulevard. The improvement shall be constructed to the ODOT interim standard,with a pavement width of 25 feet from centerline to curb. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide,to meet City standards. A copy of the ODOT permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 0001 ADDTL. ROW/HALL 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 16. Prior to issuance of the site permit,additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon,by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division,along the frontage of SW Hall Boulevard to increase the right-of-way to 45 feet from centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information,contact Rick Reeves,Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland,OR 97209-4037; Phone 731-8461). 0001 COMPLETE WORK IN PUBLIC ROW 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 17. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way(or public easement)and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 0001 OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 18. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Hall Boulevard underground as a part of this project,or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be$27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen,the amount will be$2,640.00 and it shall be paid prior to a final building inspection. 0001 PVT.WATER QUALITY FACILITY 0 Not Met BR 9/11/01 ST 19. To ensure compliance with CleanWater Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility(paver system)for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages,and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact Hap Watkins, Building Division. Page 2 of 2 HALL BLVD. DAY CARE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2001-00008 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: RECEIVED RI AWING 1. Attached is copy of Access Easement recorded for property to the south. OCT 1 t, Q 2001 2. Sheet#2(C1)of Symons Engineering drawings designate white lines to define walkway. CITY OF TIGARD 3. Attached is copy of Access Easement recorded for property to the north. 4. Fencing is designated on Sheet#2(C I)of drawings. 5. Sheet#6(L I) shows landscaping. 6. Narrative addressing criteria for minimum standard method: This method requires a minimum standard for storage based on the gross floor area(GFA). With 5035 sq. ft. building per 18.755.040 C 5. b(4), 34 square feet of mixed solid waste will be required-10 basic sq. ft. plus 4 sq. ft. for every multiple of 1000 GFA. With 5035 sq. ft.,4 sq. ft. six times will be required: 10 sq.ft. +24 sq. ft. =34 sq. ft. Location will be a single exterior site at the south side,adjacent to the building. It will not be in the parking lot, adjacent to a side street or restrictive to vehicle or foot traffic. It will be located to provide security for users. The design, size and location of the storage area has been discussed with Miller Sanitation Coordinator, Mark Hillison, and after reviewing the plans and making some design changes, he has provided a sign-off letter. The changes he requested will be reflected on the revised plans. 7. Per the provisions of City Code 18.755.050, location and area will meet code requirements. Waste and recyclable storage will be screened with sight obscuring fencing and a gate accessible for pickup. Containers will be labeled by material accepted. 8. Wheel stops are shown on Sheet#2(C-1). 9. See Sheet#2. 10. Sign permit will be applied for prior to installation. 11. Only on site tree,40"oak to rear, is located on Sheet#6(L 1). Directions for the tree's protection are on plan. 12. 4" sewer line currently serves the duplex on the property and no off-site permit will be needed. 13. George Wall, 11600 SW Bull Mt. Road, Tigard OR 97224-Phone 503-670-7814, Fax 503-624-0882. The property is held personally in the name of George and Pamela J. Wall. 14. Address fee has been paid. 15. Necessary ODOT permit attached. 16. I believe the"site permit"has been changed to"building permit"for compliance requirement. The ROW Dedication has been forwarded to the state and I expect it to be accepted. `i ' - • �,. • - EASEMENT FOR SHAPrT)ACCESS STATE OF EGA }` ss qty of Washington DATED: October 8, �d?►• of Assess- 2001 r.,.,: Clerk /`e j,,; <i ;�° County the f°r/A .� ; ...,. .a>� that .. andw-��'�!'��*"`�aaei�r4�- - eived SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: county I'- ,'"— ` ''',i.'' '� •f said 44, George E. and Pamela J. Wall *N,,:, , "' *- 1 * -mil �1� ** • 11600 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road ` % - *., , ,, for of /744-i Tigard, Oregon 97224 '-��' axation Ex- ' t .. :- jerk Doc : 2001103329 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Rect: 289532 32.00 )1Z1,41 10/10/2001 01:52:37pm yic) George E. and Pamela J. Wall ° 11600 4620 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon g , 97224 g l,) BETWEEN: George E. and Pamela J. Wall Estate of Ronald A. Hill 11600 -14620 SW Bull Mountain Rd. 10550 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97224 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Grantors Grantee THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION IS SNONE. GRANT MADE TO FULFILL CONDITIONS OF LAND USE APPROVAL Grantors are the owners of the premises described in Deed Document No. 97-055661, Washington County, Oregon Deed Records (also known as Tax Lot 2800, Assessor's Map C) IS 135AA). Grantee owns premises described in deed instrument recorded as Document No. 8930359, Washington County, Oregon Deed Records (also known as Tax Lot 03500, Assessor's Map 1 S 135AA). f, Grantors hereby grant a perpetual, nonexclusive easement for purposes of shared access to and from S.W. Hall Boulevard on, over, through and across the following described portion of Grantors'property: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 2,Block 52, METZGER ACRE TRACTS, Washington County, Oregon, which is a common corner to both tracts of land mentioned above; thence South 88°36'45" East, along the South line of said Lot 2, 15.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 01°26'00" East, Page 1 - EASEMENT FOR SHARED ACCESS 3 afni parallel with the East right of way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard, which is the West line of Document No. 97-055661,29.00 feet; thence South 88°36'45" East,parallel with the South line of said Lot 2, 27.00 feet; thence South 01°26'00" West,parallel with the • East right of way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard, 29.00 feet to the South line of said Lot 2;thence North 88°36'45" West, along the South line of said Lot 2,27.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Said easement covers 783 square feet of Document No. 97-055661. - to Grantees, their heirs, successors and assigns. Use of said driveway easement area by Grantees, their heirs, successors and assigns is subject to the following conditions: (1) Grantees shall pay to Grantors one-half of Grantors' costs of installing driveway improvements in said easement area. (2) Grantees shall pay one-half of all future maintenance costs of said driveway • access easement area. (3) Grantees shall grant to Grantors an easement to use for driveway access purposes, any driveway constructed on Grantees'property adjacent to and abutting the above described easement area on Grantors'property. (4) Grantees shall not park vehicles upon or otherwise obstruct the use of the easement area by Grantors in any manner. This easement is granted solely for the benefit of Grantees' above described property. Grantors warrant that they have fee simple title and estate in the above described • easement area and full legal right to grant the easement rights herein described. To have and to hold the above described and granted easement unto Grantees and , Grantees' assigns forever, subject to the conditions stated herein. F In Witness Whereof, Grantors have affixed Grantors'signatures this ''day of t '7 , 2001. 2 ,-. 'finph)-e-/32"--(1 . George . Wall Pamel a J. Wall Page 2 - EASEMENT FOR SHARED ACCESS _ ;... .. STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ��Z� 2001, by George E. Wall and Pamela J. Wall. - Notary Public for regon !-� OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission Expires: V - I NANCY LA FONTAINE h NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.342905 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 1,2005 7. F-� Page 3 - EASEMENT FOR SHARED ACCESS 3 EASEMENT S. OF OREGON County of Washington } ss I, Jerry.F •2?=.T a =- of Assess- ment andTaxa orkalld: • 'o County DATED: October 8 2001 Clerk for,saidao i t '_r b Certify that , the within ns , wa�`Keceived and rec4ddeda tit .rsvor'd5�';'of said SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: county4'i . z ( (� *�{: °rte`,•' r 1 ,14, George E. and Pamela J. Wall 11600-1-1628 SW Bull Mountain Road ,ansprry pirector of Ass` 'and Taxation,Ex- Tigard, Oregon 97224 Clerk Doc : 2001103330 Z Rect: 289532 32.00 n.� AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 10/10/2001 01: 52: 37pm 'n �1(1)1 George E. and Pamela J. Wall r" 11600446-20 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 �4l BETWEEN: George E. and Pamela J. Wall Terry W. Emmert 11600 Hee SW Bull Mountain Rd. 11811 SE Highway 212 Tigard, Oregon 97224 Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Grantor Grantee 0 THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION IS $NONE. GRANT MADE TO FULFILL 0 CONDITIONS OF LAND USE APPROVAL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that George E. Wall and Pamela J. Wall, hereinafter termed "Grantor", for and in consideration of the sum of$None, and the benefits C.) accruing to Grantor herefrom, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to Terry W. Emmert, hereinafter termed "Grantee", the following described interest in real property in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A PERMANENT EASEMENT for an opening between and across abutting properties to allow for a future crossover right-of-way and drive aisle connection between parking lots on the respective properties, on, over, across, and through the properties to provide Grantee's property access to Hall Boulevard and Grantor's property access across Grantee's property to and from Southwest Oak Street. The center point of the opening location between the properties for said easement is described as follows: Page 1 -EASEMENT Arciii • Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Wall tract described in Deed Document 97-055661; thence East along the North property line of said Wall tract to a point 46.75' from said Northwest corner. Said cross through opening shall extend 12 feet West and 12 feet East from said center point, for a 24' opening. The reciprocal easement when fully granted shall allow vehicles to cross through the parking lots on the respective parcels to Hall Boulevard and to Southwest Oak Street. The rights and privileges herein granted to the Grantee are subject to condition that the Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, shall grant to Grantor, and Grantor's heirs, successors, and assigns, a reciprocal easement for an ingress and egress crossover right-of-way drive aisle between parking lots on the respective Grantor and Grantee parcels and to Southwest Oak Avenue. This easement is granted solely for the benefit of the premises described in deed document 96-079127, Washington County Deed Records, said benefitted parcel also being known as Tax Lot 2801, Washington County Assessor's Map No. 1S135AA and shall be usable by Grantee only when and if Grantee grants to Grantor the reciprocal easement described above for the benefit of the premises described in deed document 97055661, Washington County Deed records, also known as Tax Lot 2800, Washington County Assessor's Map 1S135AA. The Grantor hereby warrants they have fee simple title and estate in the above-described land, that they have full legal right to grant unto Grantee the easement right and privileges hereinabove set forth, and covenant that they will warrant and defend the easement rights herein granted from all unlawful claims whatsoever. To have and to hold the above described and granted easement unto Grantee and Grantee's assigns forever. In Witness Whereof, Grantors have affixed Grantors' signatures this '--day of , 2001. —742 Georg- . Wall Pamela . Page 2 - EASEMENT 4D■ STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, by George E. Wall and Pamela J. Wall. in Notary Public f6-Oregon i My Commission Expires: �' -(-2.3 .01:"P-, OFFICIAL SEAL i'~' " = NANCY LA FONTAINE NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ®'is,:dr COMMISSION NO.342905 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 1,2005 Page 3 - EASEMENT 3 • • Date : ..... :/ 4 ��6 • Dear. Sirs, We have reviewed your plan and/or attachments //for the proposed development at Ld S^ 3LC) /y-' 6 14_____ and find them to be in compliance with our compatibility requirements with the following Rxcepte.un : j ke;".'A r_ ad-L.: _—� t �.�.• • Lo _ . • 5U l c e • • Thank you for your consideration and timely submittal of these • materials for our review. • MILLER' S SANITARY SERVICE, INC. - • Lififra re7. • • • • • • CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 11, 2001 • Jeff Wall 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard, OR 97224 SENT VIA FAX: (503) 624-0882 Dear Mr. Wall: The City of Tigard has reviewed your request to remove the 34-inch Oak tree at 10534 SW Hall Blvd. and the mitigation plan submitted on 12/11/01. Therefore, you have permission to remove the tree. However, your Certificate of Occupancy will be held until the planting of trees according to the proposed mitigation plan has been completed. Once the mitigation requirement is complete, please call Matt Stine, the City's Forester for an inspection. I am available to answer questions and otherwise assist you as may be required at 503-639-4171, extension 317. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If I am not available, please leave your name and phone number so that I can call you back as soon as possible. Sincerely, 46•••-- -- att Scheidegger Assistant Planner I/curpin/mathew/sdr/sdr2001-00008.m it c: SDR2001-00008 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503)639-4171 TDD(503)684-2772 12/11/2001 16:02 FAX 5036847297 City of Tigard 0]001 ********************* *** TX REPORT *** ********************* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 3921 CONNECTION TEL 5036240882 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 12/11 16:01 USAGE T 01'15 PGS. SENT 2 RESULT OK SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: tjet .4411 Company: / Phone: Fax: cO 3- 4 z r .. From: 1� , - Company: City of Tigard. Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 Date: / Z f/f //6/ Pages including this page: -� COMMENTS: • • AI' CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Fax 684-7297 TO: Jeff Wall, Of 11620 SW Bull Mountain Road ' FROM: Brad Kilby, Associate Plannere-)" DATE: December 7, 2001 SUBJECT: Tree removal at 10534 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR Pursuant to your conversations with Matt Scheidegger, Associate Planner, and the information presented to me on Friday, December 7, 2001, you may remove the tree that has been identified in the letter from Mark Erwest, Certified Arborist, dated December 4, 2001 . As I explained, the required mitigation will need to be reconciled with Matt when he returns on Tuesday, December 11, 2001 . Also, you will need to prepare a revised planting plan that illustrates a schedule and location of the mitigation plantings that are going to occur on the off-site parcel so that Matt may verify their location and presence. A hold will be placed on the issuance of final occupancy of the Hall Daycare Center until the situation is resolved. r• A B CRISMAN LOGGING V ...�. 8 TREE SERVICE, INC. � : • 14940 Southwest 81st Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97224 839-2925 FAX 639-9398 \-t0 : . O, -14 1e) ^ 9 - 41 liI 1:4 J (4) 43 (,,.,4.i "MmAI-. ie,,e,c 6.rt e . 9 `7 y 5o - 6 '7 0 - 78 ' F. x. So3 - y - CL 07,e : D C 34,0c, ij p cJ 1(..AL.Y as z , , ,,,,ar..„.c;(a 2,64.4 .....4---a.A. ...y,/,‘„4,4 Je-7-_,etx i--0 Leryl : / � w ,441-44_.,C,-r . (rI 'i t ! r V. . ...( ..4.EArt4.4 1 ''X‘44-Z. ,.XL 44- H _- .. /L t- ed Vim. ..ALLe ! + / 4.A.c 2(..h . lt,( _.m1.'. )4.4fguXA CO ' - -,,u -4 . ,/� �1 A. _ tom~ 3( ,�y7._.�1.� ._-�'e 7... LLa , 2„,<:14./C--e."11./1,/ r. )71/1"eV4 e A,4.4 ,;_..., . '' T j_ititiji-Aid 0/24,1,t: P. . c 1 GEORGE WALL CONSTRUCTION 111600 SW Bull Mountain Rd. TREE MITIGATION PLAN Hall Street Daycare 10540 SW Hall Blvd. Currently the 34 inch diameter Oak on the east property line must be removed and replaced with 12 birch trees with a caliper of 11/2". This shall meet 18"of the required 34 inches. The property located at 11600 SW Bull Mountain Rd. Shall have 10 birch trees measuring 1'/2"to satisfy the 34 " mitigation requirement. For any information please contact me at(503) 740-2801. Jeff Wal( olv