The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2001-00011 snvs oinv ITIf1JZEKI 1J000 - 1OOZIIGS QmIdXa NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00011 CITY OF TIGARD DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 3/15/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 1 OF 23 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1 . Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. 2. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low- lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7-spaces. 3. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 4. Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10- foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. 5. Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. 6. Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. 7. Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. 8. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 9. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 10. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0. of the Tigard Development Code. 11 . Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. 12. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. 13. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 14. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the street improvement work in SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 2 OF 23 Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 15. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity. is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 16. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 17. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local residential street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 18. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). 19. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from ODOT for the removal of the existing driveway and culvert along the frontage of SW Pacific Highway. 20. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have obtained ODOT approval for the proposed onsite storm drainage system. 21. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00- 7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 3 OF 23 proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 31-8)-for review and approval: 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Vaeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 24. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $11,550.00 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. 26. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the Tax Lot (2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200). Based on this search, one (1) previous case was found to be associated with the property. CPA91- 00002 was an approval to change the designation of SW Naeve Street from a minor collector to a local street, and by adding a minor collector connection from 109` Avenue at Murdock Street to Pacific Highway opposite Royalty Parkway and a local street connection between 100th and 1091 Avenue north of SW Hoodview Drive. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 4 OF 23 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. The site is bordered on the south by property zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is separated from the property to the north by SW Naeve Street. The property to the north is zoned R-25 and developed with a church. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 5 OF 23 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 33,285 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 420 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 72 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - -Side yard 130 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[3] - -Rear yard - 5 ft. -Distance between front of garage& property line abutting a public or private street. - 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft Less than 45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 85 Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 6 OF 23 The proposed building is accessible from SW Naeve and SW Royalty Parkway, both of which are public streets that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows curb cuts at the entrance drives to be constructed out of concrete. The driveway approaches are a minimum of 40 feet from the side property lines. The widths of the driveway approaches are 30 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance of the proposed sales office to the northern property line and will connect to the proposed sidewalk of SW Naeve Street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of 27 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the sales office to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 7 OF 23 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot that are 30 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement. The above standard indicates that a 30-foot-wide access with 24 feet of payment is required. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway servincl the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The proposed access points to the subject property are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health. The proposed access drive on SW Naeve is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Naeve and Pacific Highway. The second access point on SW Royalty Parkway is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Royalty Parkway and SW Naeve Street. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site plan shows two (2) Karpick Maples along SW Pacific Highway, six (6) Karpick Maples along SW Naeve Street and three (3) along SW Royalty Parkway. The proposed street trees are spaced greater than 30 feet apart. According to Section 18.745.040.C, street NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 8 OF 23 trees that are medium-sized cannot be spaced greater than 30 feet apart. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The only property abutting the subject site is the nursery to the south, which is also zoned C-G General Commercial. Public streets separate properties to the north, east and west. According to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix) no buffer is required between parking lots and existing uses within the C-G zone. However, the applicant is proposing a 5-foot buffer between the subject property and the property to the south with Japanese Garden Junipers planted within the buffer. Screening: Special P-rovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant is proposing to screen the parking lot with a minimum of a 5-foot landscaped area surrounding the entire property. However, the applicant has only proposed to plant 2 types of shrubs. According to the criterion, the applicant must effectively screen the facility with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The Criterion also states that parking lot trees will be planted within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 9 OF 23 The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has chosen to demonstrate compliance with the Minimum Standards Method. According to Minimum Standards, an office use is required to provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to develop a 350 square foot building, which will require a 14 square foot storage area. The applicant has proposed a 120 square foot storage area. However, the applicant has not provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container is located at the south end of the lot and is not adjacent to any public or private street. Screening will be addressed under Section 18.755.050 C (Design Standards) of this decision. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The design standards for the refuse enclosure have not been addressed. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011!DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 10 OF 23 CONDITIONS: Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The proposed use is a used car lot. The applicant is proposing to construct an associated 350 square foot sales office. According to the Off-Street Parking standards a use of this type is required to provide 1 parking stall for every 1,000 square feet of building but no less than 4 customer parking stalls. Because the applicant is only proposing a 350 square foot building, only 4 parking stalls will be required. However, the applicant has not indicated which parking stalls will be used for customer parking. Therefore, staff cannot make a finding on whether or not the required parking is within 200 feet from the proposed building. The applicant is required to provide a plan showing 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. To eliminate potential confusion, any customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 11 OF 23 guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide 4 parking stalls for customer parking. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan does indicate 1 ADA accessible parking stall located 5 feet from the main entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and det'ined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excludin single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030 groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 12 OF 23 spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. However, the applicant has not indicated that the interior drives or access aisles will be marked to show cirection of traffic on the site. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not addressed wheel stops in the narrative and the site plan does not provide wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. However, access isles are not consistently 24 feet wide throughout the property. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this decision to provide information addressing on-site traffic flow. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a motor vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. However, the proposed sales office will be approximately 350 square feet. According to Section 18.765.050.E, the minimum bicycle parking a use may have is 2 stalls. The applicant has shown an area dedicated to bicycle parking, but has not indicated how many parking stalls will be erected. The proposed bicycle parking area is within 50 feet of the primary entrance of the sales office, is visible from the SW Naeve Street and does not block pedestrian traffic. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. Bicycle Parkin Design Requirements: Section 18.765050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required -for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 13 OF 23 of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed 350 square foot building is required to provide a minimum of a 2 stall bicycle rack, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Vehicle Sales Use is 1.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0 and the maximum is 1.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on a 350 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls. The applicant has indicated that 4 customer parking stalls will be available. However, staff cannot determine which parking stalls will be used for the required parking. Therefore, the applicant will submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 ross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed site will be constructed with a sales office that is 350 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. • Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. • Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 14 OF 23 parking lot to have wheel stops. • Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. • Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. • Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. • Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has indicated that there are 7 trees located on the proposed site that are greater than 12" in diameter. The applicant has proposed to remove 3 of the trees that are 12 inches in diameter or greater. However, the applicant has not provided an arborist report or a mitigation plan for the site. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION: Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained between 3 and 8 feet in height at the vehicular access of the property. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 15 OF 23 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The abutting parcel to the south is developed with a building that is approximately 56 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: s Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; s The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and s Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has indicated that security measures will be addressed, however, the site plan does not show the proposed sales office or indicate parking lot lighting. Therefore, the applicant must submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 16 OF 23 shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, ODOT did not mention the need for an additional bus stop. The closest bus stop is approximately 500 feet the subject site to the south at the corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall appl y unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDITION:Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW along the frontage of this site. The northerly side of the roadway was improved as a part of the Tigard Covenant Church project. Additional ROW would need to be dedicated adjacent to this site to bring the total ROW width up to 50 feet. SW Naeve Street is currently paved, but not fully improved on the south side adjacent to this site. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should complete a half-street improvement. The applicant's plans indicate they will complete the half-street as a part of this project. This site also lies adjacent to SW Royalty Parkway, a minor collector road. There is plenty of ROW adjacent to this site for this roadway, so no additional dedications are required. The City improved this roadway several years ago and there is concrete curb along the majority of the site frontage. The applicant will need to add sidewalk and street trees to bring this roadway up to standard. Their plan shows that they will provide those improvements as a part of this project. SW Pacific Highway is adjacent to the west boundary of this site, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. ODOT staff commented that the applicant should construct frontage NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 17 OF 23 improvements along the highway. However, after City Staff spoke to them, and indicated that the City could not justify such a condition based on the impact of the development, ODOT concurred that frontage improvements are not warranted. ODOT will require the applicant to remove the existing culvert and driveway from SW Pacific Highway. The applicant will need to obtain a permit from ODOT for this work. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By completing the street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Royalty Parkway that the applicant can access for service to this site. The main line has plenty of capacity for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sites adjacent to this site are fully developed. No upstream flows impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 18 OF 23 The applicant's plan indicates they will collect their onsite storm water runoff in a pond near the southwest corner of the site where it will be treated before being released into the Pacific Highway ROW. The applicant stated that they have coordinated with ODOT and have designed onsite detention to meet ODOT standards. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant should provide evidence that ODOT has reviewed and approved the proposed storm drainage plan. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 420 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $11 ,550.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 19 OF 23 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the public main line in SW Naeve Street. The applicant's proposed tap of the main line will be covered by the public improvement permit. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 0 -7 ) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide a vegetated extended dry detention pond for treatment of the stormwater. The preliminary sizing calculations for this pond indicate the applicant has provided adequate room on the site for the pond. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection , the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading/erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The site is less than five acres in size, so a NPDES permit is not necessary. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 20 OF 23 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (-IF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $948 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $2,962 ($948 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $2,014. Tigard's Development Code section 18.810 requires that streets must be brought up to city standards for a development project to be approved. The applicant has proposed to construct half- street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway since this is the frontage from which they are obtaining access. Therefore, this section is satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments. • Why do the plans not indicate a sidewalk along Highway 99W. Please let me know the answer to this question. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • Provide easement for water lines in area to be vacated. Update existing water valve boxes, maintain cover over existing water line of 3 feet. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Request lighting plan for exterior. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Building permits required for sales office. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm @ 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 21 OF 23 minimum fire flow is available. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 3. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (UFC Sec. 8704) 4 A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01 , Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/new construction.htm The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: 1 . The existing culvert and driveway on OR 99W shall be removed and replaced with curb and sidewalk along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA. 2. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way. All plans and specifications must be submitted to the ODOT District 2A office in metric. Dual units are acceptable. 3. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right-of-way. The applicant should provide ODOT District 2A with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right-of-way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right-of-way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. 4. All environmental issues shall be identified and addressed in the final design. Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from affected agencies. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for information on the written permit application process. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 22 OF 23 Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 8, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schdule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 7, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. _ • -— - December 20, 2001 PREPARED : Ma hew Sch- dr.ger DATE Assistant Planner ` call December 20, 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be ers rff DATE Planning Man ger I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00011.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 23 OF 23 1 I CITY of TIGARD `*; OIOORA►N10 IMP Oa NATION rii , i_on. VICINITY MAP 14 : I W, , 1111 AIM � 1 Rd SDR2001 0001 I iiiiiiimo it W I 1 iEN r DEZFULLI,40 ■ . r t :.,,,. I . MURDOCKF AUTO SALES VIE . ST is „ tra 7 fl�trllt rhfyu ...l , . E -♦ r`pgl,r�Ip//i airpolli - f a 2 e� w a■� I I I a;ø%rf N 0 200 400 600 f.t 4a .' �� +w�.■�� '4J�l7 'I. .� t".405 feet SIN <ZO� ® ,, S.W. NEAVE STREE F ,, ' .0: is■... l�] Ci of Tigard I< , • ' . : Cam,■. .••K•. , tY g �� '%' 0 Information on this map Is for;Kn.ral location only and if should b.vartMd with the Development Servkas Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd ' S..' Tiard.OR 97223 '^,�f� \ ` (503)639-4171 , 1 ` \w/A' htlpaAwvw.u.tigaM.or.us Community Development Plot date: Nov 14,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR / I I I 4 ( ORALS DTA LRL10/P•• X. I ,.. '-, ''...°■ . \ / '. `�\ I .. � �. , `°. ` \ Alli \ \ wry I. 1 I�' �� oHw>a mwRUOt 0.70 AG ♦/ a _..� .rr__ '` L ,•■ I (1 nry , 7, • ------,..„, ---6 \ . .-- ro x wCAtm .,,\ Lq, rat AGM/ I I I S I I spa OFFICE M 9 / .�4 ■ i I �a :� ��c, .o{0� \ . er/10.", i• ' ` Sr Y / A: CITY OF TIGARD SDR2001.00011 CITY 01 DOARD SITE PLAN N DEZFULLI AUTO SALES (Map is not to scale) NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OFTIGARD (SDR) 2001 00011 Community Development l - Shaping A Better Community DEZFULLI AUTO SALES 120 DAYS =3/15/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASE NO: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. APPLICANT: Ebrahim Dezfulli OWNER: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 01200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 8, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provi that a written appeal together w' ie required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) L,usiness days of the date the Notic,_ Jf Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 7, 2002. Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. /-- I it ."n,1``�F.. I ' rl- ! • 11� a t,// ..',., `'' •'. ""°*`\ A` III vou;R N�f war � rjJ — ra I l�l / Io.e 1 ..` �/ I , v T: . \ \ -,b ,. \ I 1 CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2001.00011 SITE PLAN N DEZFULLI AUTO SALES I(Map Is not to scale) 01 i .. • ■ VICINITY MAP MN a". 11. Mil MOW ilifiralliPirfr Nq • lb al ■ = SDR2001-00011 1111 w O �re ' DEifULll AUTO SALES 11•11111W-4110111 ,,. 4, ■■■U ,,, , =�:` III\ 0i♦ \1,c /1. ■ $gly * i AN I" ' Iron . - - -- 0 41 14 At Ar Ira ! 6530 "s4-fih mai I OS% A -..WI RI ri•4111"la A .$0, , . -,,,,,. ." .....01 - .k4,* 4/ .4,4 0 ----=- n.e.,. IOpn.nt aa: a.: , NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TY O I CITY Of TIGARD Community(Devefopment Shaping f1 Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: November 16, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00011 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 30, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 11, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I .';z4i I CITY o:TIGAR Dy Lilo q'' '1111111111 �. I, SDR2001-00011 all /manila 'n ' DEZFULLI WI o AUTO SALES Ires1111111 Nel r 1 111111111/40.11111 440,,„ t � �� r► _i.:;.: „:.," ..;:.10 .4.■$■\.4''''.4 Ell I II I t 0 SSA° --,7; \- ife, ,..' itgir; Y" 4. 4,1114. Es E, , s. 4, Ar 41 Ai_ ... Mk i • - ... Al fa+ 415,, 1r .-'' 714 Op',. ��,�'�� . I .. °.,. fir•:■■■■I ....�arnaa Ies** AI a a !;11‘49 MI g ar..,#00 um Owwwr REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: December 12, 2001 TO: Matt Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2001-00011, Dezfulli Auto Sales Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW along the frontage of this site. The northerly side of the roadway was improved as a part of the Tigard Covenant Church project. Additional ROW would need to be dedicated adjacent to this site to bring the total ROW width up to 50 feet. SW Naeve Street is currently paved, but not fully improved on the south side adjacent to this site. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should complete a half-street improvement. The applicant's plans indicate they will complete the half-street as a part of this project. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 1 This site also lies adjacent to SW Royalty Parkway, a minor collector road. There is plenty of ROW adjacent to this site for this roadway, so no additional dedications are required. The City improved this roadway several years ago and there is concrete curb along the majority of the site frontage. The applicant will need to add sidewalk and street trees to bring this roadway up to standard. Their plan shows that they will provide those improvements as a part of this project. SW Pacific Highway is adjacent to the west boundary of this site, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. ODOT staff commented that the applicant should construct frontage improvements along the highway. However, after City Staff spoke to them, and indicated that the City could not justify such a condition based on the impact of the development, ODOT concurred that frontage improvements are not warranted. ODOT will require the applicant to remove the existing culvert and driveway from SW Pacific Highway. The applicant will need to obtain a permit from ODOT for this work. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By completing the street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Royalty Parkway that the applicant can access for service to this site. The main line has plenty of capacity for this development. Storm Drainage: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 2 General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sites adjacent to this site are fully developed. No upstream flows impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan indicates they will collect their onsite storm water runoff in a pond near the southwest corner of the site where it will be treated before being released into the Pacific Highway ROW. The applicant stated that they have coordinated with ODOT and have designed onsite detention to meet ODOT standards. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant should provide evidence that ODOT has reviewed and approved the proposed storm drainage plan. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 3 Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. PLANNING Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. PLANNING Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. PLANNING Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 4 authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 420 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $ 11,550.00. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the public main line in SW Naeve Street. The applicant's proposed tap of the main line will be covered by the public improvement permit. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide a vegetated extended dry detention pond for treatment of the stormwater. The preliminary sizing ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 5 calculations for this pond indicate the applicant has provided adequate room on the site for the pond. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading/erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The site is less than five acres in size, so a NPDES permit is not necessary. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 6 Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the street improvement work in SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local residential street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 7 H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I. underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from ODOT for the removal of the existing driveway and culvert along the frontage of SW Pacific Highway. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have obtained ODOT approval for the proposed onsite storm drainage system. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 8 to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $ 11,550.00 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 1\t ig333\u sr\depts\eng\bnanr\com me nt s\sdr\sdr2001-00011.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 2001-00011 Dezfulli Auto Sales PAGE 9 /' � Department of Transportation IJregon Region 1 123 NW Flanders John A.Kitzhaber,M.D.,Governor Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 FAX(503) 731-8259 RECEIVED PLANNING FILE CODE: December 3, 2001 DEC 0 5 2001 PLA9-2A-91 ODOT Case No: 1294 City of Tigard CIO(OF-WARD Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Mathew Scheidegger Subject: SDR2001-00011: Dezfulli Auto Sales OR 99W and SW Naeve St Dear Mr. Scheidegger, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 SF sales office. The site is adjacent to OR 99W. According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), OR 99W is classified a Statewide Urban highway. ODOT has permitting authority for this facility' and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. To ensure compatibility with state standards and requirements, we request the City of Tigard require the mitigation measures outlined below through conditions of approval. Marah, since we are not adding a driveway to this site, I agree with you, we can recommend to include the sidewalk as part of the frontage improvement, that was why I add some language about a permit that will be required for any work within the right-of- way. Therefore, a sidewalk improvement can be part of this half street improvement, and also addressing the environmental issues and concerns. ODOT requests the land use decision include the following Conditions of Approval to address applicable state and local approval criteria and ODOT permit requirements: Recommended Conditions of Approval 1. The existing culvert and driveway on OR 99W shall be removed and replaced with curb and sidewalk along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA standards. 1 OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR734/734051.html Form 734-1850(1/98) City of Tigard; SDR2001-0( , Dezfulli Auto Sales 2 • ODOT RESPONSE 12/03/01 2. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way2. All plans and specifications must be submitted to the ODOT District 2A office in metric. Dual units are acceptable. 3. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities3. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant should provide ODOT District 2A with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. 4. All environmental issues shall be identified and addressed in the final design. Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from affected agencies. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for information on the written permit application process. Thank you for coordinating with ODOT on this review. If you have questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 503-731-8258. Please forward a copy of the Decision with Final Findings when it has been issued. Sin rely, "e4/A/Lt4 Marah Danielson Development Review C: Sam Hunaidi, ODOT, District 2A Chi Mai, ODOT, Region 1 Traffic Ebriham Dezfulli, 12587 SW 133rd Ave, Tigard, OR 97223 2 OAR 734-055 3 OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR_734/734_051.html 12/03/01 12:52 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS (1001/002 : ' Oregon Department of Transportation :,v.•..;; tt Region 1 John A_Kitchuber.MD.,Governor 123 NW Flanders -3'6(2 Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503)731-8200 FAX(503)731-8259 FILE CODE; December 3, 2001 PLA9-2A-91 ODOT Case No: 1294 City of Tigard Planning Division — — — — — — 13125 SW Hall Blvd_ Data 1§�pages Tigard, Post-1 Fax Note igard, OR 97223 7x71 From Attn: Mathew Scheidegger Phone 4 Phone - Subject: SDR2001-00011: Dezfulli Auto OR 99W and SW Naeve St Dear Mr. Scheidegger, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 SF sales office. The site is adjacent to OR 99W- According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), OR 99W is classified a Statewide Urban highway. ODOT has permitting authority for this facility' and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. To ensure compatibility with state standards and requirements, we request the City of Tigard require the mitigation measures outlined below through conditions of approval. Marah, since we are not adding a driveway to this site, I agree with you, we can recommend to include the sidewalk as part of the frontage improvement, that was why I add some language about a permit that will be required for any work within the right-of- way_ Therefore, a sidewalk improvement can be part of this half street improvement, and also addressing the environmental issues and concerns. ODOT requests the land use decision include the following Conditions of Approval to address applicable state and local approval criteria and ODOT permit requirements: Recommended Conditions of Approval 1. The existing culvert and driveway on OR 99W shall be removed and replaced with curb and sidewalk along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA standards. OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos-state.or-us/rules/OARS 700/OAR 734/734 051_html form 734-18 O(1/98) 12/03/01 12:52 FAX 1 503 731 8259 ODOT RG 1-FLANDERS 0002/002 City of Tigard;SDR2001-L i, Dezfulli Auto Sales 2 ODOT RESPONSE 12/03/01 2. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way2. All plans and specifications must be submitted to the ODOT District 2A office in metric. Dual units are acceptable. 3. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities3_ Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant should provide ODOT District 2A with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. 4. All environmental issues shall be identified and addressed in the final design. Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from affected agencies. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for information on the written permit application process. Thank you for coordinating with ODOT on this review. If you have questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 503-731-8258_ Please forward a copy of the Decision with Final Findings when it has been issued. Sincerely, • Marah Danielson Development Review C: Sam Hunaidi, ODOT, District 2A Chi Mai, ODOT, Region 1 Traffic Ebriham Dezfulli, 12587 SW 133rd Ave, Tigard, OR 97223 2 OAR 734-055 3 OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb_sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS 700/OAR 734/734 051_html REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIAA TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Department a 0 3 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: [5031639-4111/Fax: [5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES 4 REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: PitEoe-15-r- Vs far R EQ &I RAJ /44-77"STif (lease provide the farming information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): I� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF Community(DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department NOV 2 9 2001 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TICp STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 Phone: 15031639-4111/Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. s PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: l�en.wk ✓� 1A14. w4 i h wY� J'c ca '�QVoI cP IJ -14 4t,;) 4 Ile- (b,; w�KJ 1,Led anti 41,3 cam/value baw4 , tylvt.01-10.1" 'wok N-w.--, Coin out( a%.;-h �- (vZ0c 11 &A bT cLT/►? W % J7-V4/Sr, K2,// OCease provide t(efolrowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C,OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 RECEIVED PLANNING TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official NOV 2 0 2001 CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 Phone: [5031639-41111 Fax: (5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISORI 2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Q ) ,, ct s S A CI (P(ease provide tfiefoltowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: IPhone Number(s): REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Devetopment Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 RECEIVE: TO: •tJtlohn Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Department NOV 1 9 2001 FROM: ! City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3171 Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR]2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Ptease refer to the enclosed letter. Wri en comments provi ed below: • 90 �-a .6/;e&Cam. C_- /�- � .� •' 4 f (rPlease provide the foffawing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 D PLANNIN2001 G TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer RECEIVENO,� 1 5 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division CITY OF TIGARD STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 Phone: (5031 639-4171/Fax: (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: tee-p.(4.3,C "I'D 64- 4.4-dillt.ciCtik aff4e1,71-C '1"6 rA4h4a (Pfl ase provide the folrowing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Li waif I Phone Number(s): x of I , . A. REQUEST FOR COMMENT CITY OF TIOARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community Development Shaping A Better Community NOV 1 6 2001 DATE: November 16,2001 CITY OF T+GARD TO: Sherman Casper,Permit Coordinator/Community Development Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x3171 Phone: (5031639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.i Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (rP1 ase provide thefolthwing information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I DATE: Nov 16, 2001 PLANS CHECK NO PROJECT TITLE: COUNTYWIDE DEZFULLI AUTO SALES TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE WORKSHEET APPLICANT: (FOR NON-SINGLE FAMILY USES) MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/ZIP/PHONE: TAX MAP No.: 2S 110DB01200 SITES NO.ADDRESS: 15280 SW Pacific Hwy LAND USE CATEGORY RATE PER TRIP RESIDENTIAL $ 226.00 X BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL $ 57.00 OFFICE $ 207.00 Estimated TIF INDUSTRIAL $217.00 INSTITUTIONAL $ 94.00 PAYMENT METHOD: CASH/CHECK CREDIT BANCROFT(PROMISSORY NOTE) LAND USE CATEGORY DESCRIPTION OF USE WEEKDAY AVG. INSTITUTIONAL ONLY: 841 New Car Sale TRIP RATE WEEKEND AVG.TRIP RATE DEFER TO OCCUPANCY 47.52 BASIS: Applicant proposed construction used car sale facility including a 350 sq. ft. sales office building. CALCULATIONS: Wk day TIF = Avg. trips X T.G.S.F. X PER TRIP $ 948 = 47.52 X .350 X $57 TRANSIST AMT. $289 = 17 =TRIP GEN X 17 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION: 17 FEE: $948 FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES ONLY ADDITIONAL NOTES: No credits applied, weekday average trip rate for Used car land use is not ROAD AMT. available,New car sale assumed most similar. $659 TRANSIT AMT. $289 PREPARED BY: S.S. Casper I:TI FWKST.DOC (DST) EFF: 07-01-98 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OFTIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: November 16,2001 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x3111 Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (5031684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2001-00011 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: NOVEMBER 30, 2001. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information)Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR COI ENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOI MEN APPLICATIONS I)-_2Irl/i, FILE NOS.: 3 DR 2-C) f -o I I FILE NAME: c1 s.e d (w i, •j CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREA: ❑Central DEast ak'South ❑West IZIProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./Planning-Engineering Techs. POLICE DEPT./Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official t ENGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer V WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley.City Recorder PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager ,PUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester - ✓PLANNER-POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! , .C.D,/Sherman Casper,Permit Coord.(sorvcuP re:TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS — TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.iR4 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE+R Or TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* _ CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street NE _ Irish Bunnell,Development Services PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97301-1279 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(zCA) _US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 _ Paulette Allen,Grown,Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coodinator(CPNzoA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) PO Box 2946 Iy.CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 15300 SW 116th Avenue WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powenines in Area) OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Aeronautics Division 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera Tom Highland,Planning Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 3040 25th Street,SE Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Salem,OR 97310 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(IGANRB) —CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) Sonya Kazen,Development Review Coordinator _Phil Healy(IGA URB) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(cPAacA)rts14 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 1s Portland,OR 97204 _Doria Mateja(zcA)Ms 14 _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northem/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W. 10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS AT&T C_' CABLE TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (If Project is Within''/.Mile of A Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 —PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC —NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY —VERIZON k QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Jim VanKleek,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Richard Jackson,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 —TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 — AT&T CABLE(Are,.E.wHrtmiwaaw) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Portland,OR 97232 11f INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 7-Nov-01) MAILING RECORDS / CITY of TIGARD I"J, :, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Low oo. ■ VICINITY MAP 411Wiri WOK I.G L E A C:1,_._....._..._........_....j JIM Mill 1 _ _ SDR2001 -0001 BULL MOUNTAIN RD �- 11P1 1 z w MART '--� DEZEULLI Pigs ;� c- MURflO(K$ AUTO SALES bilk / 03 VIE ■. : �.� P"�C,�' �tln�il'410 �c PFN pis. . J4juply, ‘40 NiiiIIII i.4' 44ifi° st4 r. N eR $; I I l 11111p: # ��`� 8 .r :DY rn N'fr 1,*..,.. Yf`' c vL 0••0 64 47 SITE m cr , • °tali# � .Q N • Q •t, E OW S 200 400 fi00 Feet , ,�, • il�i's..i �+'-�++® grit� 1"=405 feel .,• •�, ••, at �, s -�, $W �� ji� �,.' � , -- S.W. NEAVE STREE' Alk �.� ,,. ♦♦ 0 i;... .� ""oOK ., , City of Tigard (�T�1 I Ai �a �� '�10W • `9� , ♦ ■a D •e- , Information on this map is for general location only and i a should be verified with the Development Services Division. .� ��#;, ♦♦ al • '''� 13125 SW Hall Blvd ♦ •. Tigard,OR 97223 Q�' . ♦ t . -�'^`�{ (503)639-4171 1 ` JPl http:/hto v.Cl.11gard.or.u3 Community Development Plot date:Nov 14,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR / ; I I 4 stir asr. cu • I 4' 1. �� \ ` - : • A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING J. ' CITY OF TIGARD Community®evefopment Shaping Better Community I, Patricia L. Lunsford being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of'gar: Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) E3 NOTICE OF PENDING LANO USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2001-0001 I/DEIFULLI AUTO SALES 0 AMENDED NOTICE (File NoiName Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B", and by reference made a part hereof, on November 16,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on November 16,2001, postage prepaid. / ) jd,X/C--0.,,- 1(1,7_ 17- /rle) .../' (Person that Prepared Notice STAr1rE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 7 day of K— , 2001. f= ,, OFFICIAL SEAL +f F 5,..'x j DIANE M JELDERKS t NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ' COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 cs/ f NOT RYP�COF ! ' IH My Commission Ares:es: 7,i/7/' .3 £XHTh: A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER, NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION 41110 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW O I CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: November 16, 2001 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00011 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 30, 2001. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideoger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 11, 2001. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; ♦ Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; ♦ Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City ♦ Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. ♦ City Staff issues a written decision. ♦ Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." mIIII. ■`--- - 4-1,01 TIGARD I W,, gq A 111 •■ VICINITY MAP MV" ��1 — two 8::��. �■II SDR200100011 �ii1ju:I 1 I _ DELFULLI �`� ' AUTO SALES pi. ...1111111ralgelli -,0,„„ .,. ar1 : : -s �:. al I In v %/ ,• Pb • p 4 N ilia ti N �;.,�0•A� . �°` .::ED ::111•� lulU ull ow u! Al ,- ,�,#''�' •. .. Ikl la.. •�• ' r..�., City of T r ''• •�. _M....._0..... �� r......... EXHIBIT B 2S 110DB-90821 2S 110CA-80441 ADAMS JOSEPH J BRADFISH NORMAN J 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 c/o NEWLAND BOYDE E TIGARD,OR 97224 14988 SW 109TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-91031 2S 110CA-80491 ALDERMAN JOHN BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 REVOCABLE TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80431 2S 110CA-80411 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A BRUTKE CRYSTAL A TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 PO BOX 51 TIGARD,OR 97224 CARLTON,OR 97111 2S 110 D B-00200 2S 110CA-80561 ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST BURNETT LORETTA C BY PALMER GROTH&PIEKA 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 ATTN:TODD S LIEBOW KING CITY,OR 97224 110 SW YAMHILL#200 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10 D B-00200 2S1 10D B-90952 • CHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST CARMICAL FRED W TR BY •• MER G': H&PIEKA 15437 SW 114TH CT#95 ATTN: .►: S LIEBOW TIGARD,OR 97224 110 YA• ILL#200 fRTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10 D B-90891 23 110CA-80671 ARNDT RAYMOND& CHANEY DAVID F TRUSTEE ARNDT KATHLEEN M& 1186 NW REDFIELD CIR PARR SANDRA A BEND,OR 97701 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80571 2S 110CA-80591 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CHENOWETH MILDRED H 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND,OR 97219 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-90982 2S 110CA-80601 BARNETT ANGELA COLLIVER WINIFRED R 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80741 2S 110CA-80831 BOYD DIANE M COMBS JOYCE M 15215 SW 116TH AVE 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 23 110DB-90971 2S1 10 DB-90842 BOYLE RICHARD 0&BEVERLY J CO- CONNER VERNA D& 3610 LINCOLN AVE HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES DEPOE BAY,OR 97341 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-910(1 2S1100B-90381 CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A FROST LENA D 10306 E SILVERTREE CT 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1 10D B-90962 2S 110CA-80421 CURTIS DAVID L&LYNNE G GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE 10215 SW ANDERSON CT 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 TUALATIN,OR 97062 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80881 2S 110CA-80471 DAVIS JAMES M&ESTALENE A GILBERT VIRGINIA LEE 11505 SW TERRA LINDA 15100 SW CROWN DR NO.4 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80801 2S 110CA-80691 DENNY ADELE C GRANZOW KENNETH J&JESSIE M 15200 SW CROWN DR 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-00103 2S 110CA-80781 DENNY PURKEY LLC GREGG NANCY L 15350 SW 116TH 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-01200 2S110DB-91081 DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 12587 SW 133RD 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80551 2S 110CA-80751 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H HANLEIN JON K 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 33 BLANCA DR BEAVERTON,OR 97008 NOVATO,CA 94947 25110DB-90811 23 110DB-91022 FORD DONNA T TRUST HARRISON H FAYE 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 11 ODB-90000 2S 110CA-80611 FOU AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HATLELI DARLENE 0 RS UNITS 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 , 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80761 23 110CA-80501 FRANK SHIRLEY A HOLMAN WILLIAM C 15215 SW 116TH HOLMAN SUSAN M KING CITY,OR 97224 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S 110CA-80531 2S 110CA-80901 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE KREPEL RICHARD M 3607 SW DOSCH RD 36 WESTRIDGE DR PORTLAND,OR 97201 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S 110DB-00500 2S 110CA-80821 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F 6566 SE LAKE RD#A MORIN RITA K MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110D B-90991 2S 110DB-90941 KESSLER LORRAINE LEVIN DOREEN A 15435 SW 114TH#99 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90371 2S110CA-00100 KINCAID JUANITA LUTON ROBERT C 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE do KVERNLAND ERIC B PORTLAND,OR 97225 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2 S 110CA-00102 2S 110DB-91102 KING CITY CITY OF LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15300 SW 116TH 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01600 2S 11008-90912 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARENDISH JOYCE M 15245 SW 116TH 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110CA-80721 KING CITY CONDO UNIT OWNERS MARTIN CARL W/LORRAINE M BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO MARTIN CLARA WILMA 15300 SW 116TH AVE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD,OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110CA-80911 G CITY CONS UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE BY T -•_ • •EVELOPMENT CO 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 1530' 11. . AVE KING CITY,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110DB-90362 G CITY CO■ .O UNIT OWNERS MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND BY Tb L: DEVELOPMENT CO GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 15300 • 116TH AVE 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 T ARD,OR =7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 S 110CA-808 1 2S 110CA-80541 KI I CONDOMINIUM MCNUTT HARRY B&IDABELL C OW F UNITS 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80511 2S 110CA-80581 MUNION CATHERINE M REITER EDWARD M 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11545 MAJESTIC LN#5 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80731 2S1 10CA-80851 MURPHY DOROTHY I TRUST RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15910 SW QUEEN VICTORIA PL 15270 SW CROWN DR KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80861 2S 110CA-80791 NESET DAVID N AND BETTY J ROGERS WILLIAM L PMB#319 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15685 SW 116TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-90901 2S 110CA-80391 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROTHENBERGER ALBERT&DORIS BY ARTHUR F JRNIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 11470 SW CROWN DR#4 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-01300 2S1 10D B-91071 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C 330 SW LINCOLN 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97224 23 110CA-80701 2S 110DB-90351 PHILLIPS MARY F SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 D B-90931 2S 110CA-80771 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHULER PEARL J THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 15437 SW 114TH CT KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80451 2S 110D B-00703 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SFP-B LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 1015 MADRAS HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PRINEVILLE,OR 97754 2S 110DB-91041 2S 110CA-80621 POLLOW NORMA JEANNE SHEVCHENKO EDITH U 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80511 25110DB-91052 RAY ROBERT W&MARY E SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-91012 2S110DB-00704 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 425 PIKE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S 110DB-91062 2S 110CA-80711 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEBER BETTY JEAN& 10321 LAKE DR SE NEWMAN JOAN E& SALEM,OR 97306 LEE ALAN K 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DC-02200 2S 110CA-80481 TIGARD CENTER LP WEBER MABEL L BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 609 KING CITY,OR 97224 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S110DB-00702 2S110CA-80811 RD CENT- LP WHIPPLE ALBION&LEAH B BY B "S REALTY&MNGT CO 8640 SE CAUSEY AVE APT P103 977 ' L :E BLVD STE 609 PORTLAND,OR 97266 VERLY HILL CA 90212 2S110DB-00300 2S110CA-80841 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WIESE YVONNE H 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15270 SW CROWN DR TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 1100B-90402 2S 1100B-91092 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WILLOUGHBY GEORGE F AND 15485 SW 114TH#40 SYLVIA R TIGARD,OR 97224 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80401 2S 110DB-90922 TILLOTSON ELSIE WILSON PHYLLIS A 11470 SW CROWN DR#3 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 11006-90832 2S 110CA-80871 TRACY SHARON M ZIEHWEIN TIMOTHY P 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 15290 SW CROWN DR TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110CA-80461 WALKER GORDON V& WALKER SUSAN B 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 Sally Christensen Kristen Miller 15685 SW 76th Avenue 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Ann Melvin Bill Finck 10395 SW Bonanza Way 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Stephen Bicker Craig Dirksen 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mark Bogert Paul Owen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady Rick Boyce 9360 SW Edgewood Street 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Bob Oleson 15065 SW 79th Avenue 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Tim and Alison Ross 15374 SW Thurston Lane 10045 SW Serena Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Judith Anderson PO Box 230695 16640 SW Jordan Way Tigard, OR 97281 King City, OR 97224 Stacie Yost Mark Kretzinger 8465 SW Langtree 15136 SW 96th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein Jack Biethan 14630 SW 139th Avenue 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 17-Aug-01 / CITY of TIGARD /4 04 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM PIPAREA'��, NOTIFIED (500') 40" IA .R �•• i ♦ ;� ■ I `t . $ t .< Z. "�'' > WA/ FOR: Abe Dezfulli ��N.F ' .0 w. �v'� II•r.E7EE es • m RE: 2S I I ODB, 1 200 a 02. # .)..""`' ‘,;:..14-or. 9,#ifti. ' -7 p ." L , - i ,. , w..Ft+-.� ``` 1r % °: .vai V Q a . 41111. Pr a w. ■s o aR:T ■i-r �� 0 0 1110141itai ANEW AT.41111"' N*I a __,_______ ,.!. . Ow'I1P �: +��" O. W.RpoK • Ie111eEUUe , ,l1 O •. 0 100 200 300 400 Feet MI ' OIL 1 EL s-- 0•I 1"=301 feel * IIP All --AllsAjl.1:1 ti City of Tigard • li` lie Infomrtion on this map is for general location only and ■L should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd ;�'� Tigard,503)OR 9171 O (503)639-4171 y^ hltp:l/www.cl.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Sep 4,2001;C:Magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S 110DB-90821 2S 110CA-80441 ADAMS JOSEPH J BRADFISH NORMAN J 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 Go NEWLAND BOYDE E TIGARD,OR 97224 14988 SW 109TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-91031 2S 110CA-80491 ALDERMAN JOHN BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 REVOCABLE TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80431 2S110CA-80411 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A BRUTKE CRYSTAL A TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 PO BOX 51 TIGARD,OR 97224 CARLTON,OR 97111 2S 110DB-00200 2S 110CA-80561 ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST BURNETT LORETTA C BY PALMER GROTH&PIEKA 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 ATTN:TODD S LIEBOW KING CITY,OR 97224 110 SW YAMHILL#200 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 11008-00200 2S 110DB-90952 • 'CHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST CARMICAL FRED W TR BY •• MER G'= H&PIEKA 15437 SW 114TH CT#95 ATTN: : % S LIEBOW TIGARD,OR 97224 110 YA ILL#200 ••RTLAND,OR 97204 2S1 10D B-90891 2S 110CA-80671 ARNDT RAYMOND& CHANEY DAVID F TRUSTEE ARNDT KATHLEEN M& 1186 NW REDFIELD CIR PARR SANDRA A BEND,OR 97701 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80571 2S 110CA-80591 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CHENOWETH MILDRED H 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND,OR 97219 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90982 2S 110CA-80601 BARNETT ANGELA COLLIVER WINIFRED R 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80741 2S110CA-80831 BOYD DIANE M COMBS JOYCE M 15215 SW 116TH AVE 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10D B-90971 2S 110DB-90842 BOYLE RICHARD 0&BEVERLY J CO- CONNER VERNA D& 3610 LINCOLN AVE HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES DEPOE BAY,OR 97341 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110 D B-91001 2S 110DB-90381 CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A FROST LENA D 10306 E SILVERTREE CT 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110DB-90962 2S 110CA-80421 CURTIS DAVID L&LYNNE G GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE 10215 SW ANDERSON CT 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 TUALATIN,OR 97062 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80881 2S110CA-80471 DAVIS JAMES M&ESTALENE A GILBERT VIRGINIA LEE 11505 SW TERRA LINDA 15100 SW CROWN DR NO.4 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80801 2S110CA-80691 DENNY ADELE C GRANZOW KENNETH J&JESSIE M 15200 SW CROWN DR 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-00103 2S 110CA-80781 DENNY PURKEY LLC GREGG NANCY L 15350 SW 116TH 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110D B-01200 2S 110DB-91081 DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 12587 SW 133RD 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80551 2S110CA-80751 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H HANLEIN JON K 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 33 BLANCA DR BEAVERTON,OR 97008 NOVATO,CA 94947 2S 110DB-90811 2S 110D B-91022 FORD DONNA T TRUST HARRISON H FAYE 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 10DB-90000 2S 110CA-80611 FOU AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HATLELI DARLENE 0 RS UNITS 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80781 2S110CA-80501 FRANK SHIRLEY A HOLMAN WILLIAM C 15215 SW 116TH HOLMAN SUSAN M KING CITY,OR 97224 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S.1 0CA-8053.1 2S 110CA-80901 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE KREPEL RICHARD M 3607 SW DOSCH RD 36 WESTRIDGE DR PORTLAND,OR 97201 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 25110DB-00500 2S110CA-80821 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F 6566 SE LAKE RD#A MORIN RITA K MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90991 2S 110DB-90941 KESSLER LORRAINE LEVIN DOREEN A 15435 SW 114TH#99 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 1100B-90371 25 110CA-00100 KINCAID JUANITA LUTON ROBERT C 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE c/o KVERNLAND ERIC B PORTLAND,OR 97225 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-00102 2S110013-91102 KING CITY CITY OF LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15300 SW 116TH 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-01600 2S 110DB-90912 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARENDISH JOYCE M 15245 SW 116TH 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1 1 OCA-80000 2S1 1 OCA-80721 KING CITY CONDO UNIT OWNERS MARTIN CARL W/LORRAINE M BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO MARTIN CLARA WILMA 15300 SW 116TH AVE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD,OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110CA-80911 G CITY CON UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE BY T EVELOPMENT CO 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 1530 11 AVE KING CITY,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110DB-90362 G CITY CO 0 UNIT OWNERS MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND BY T DEVELOPMENT CO GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 1530 116TH AVE 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 T ARD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 S 110CA-808 1 2S 110CA-80541 KI I CONDOMINIUM MCNUTT HARRY B&IDABELL C OW F UNITS 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S'110CA-80521 2S110CA-80581 MUNION CATHERINE M REITER EDWARD M 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11545 MAJESTIC LN#5 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80731 2S 110CA-80851 MURPHY DOROTHY I TRUST RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15910 SW QUEEN VICTORIA PL 15270 SW CROWN DR KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80861 2S 110CA-80791 NESET DAVID N AND BETTY J ROGERS WILLIAM L PMB#319 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15685 SW 116TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90901 2S 110CA-80391 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROTHENBERGER ALBERT&DORIS BY ARTHUR F JR/VIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 11470 SW CROWN DR#4 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-01300 2S110DB-91071 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C 330 SW LINCOLN 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80701 2S 110DB-90351 PHILLIPS MARY F SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90931 2S110CA-80771 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHULER PEARL J THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 15437 SW 114TH CT KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80451 2S 1100B-00703 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SFP-B LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 1015 MADRAS HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PRINEVILLE,OR 97754 2511008-91041 2S 110CA-80621 POLLOW NORMA JEANNE SHEVCHENKO EDITH U 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 25 110CA-80511 2S1 100 B-91052 RAY ROBERT W&MARY E SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S) ODB-91012 25110DB-00704 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 425 PIKE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S 110D B-91062 2S 110CA-80711 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEBER BETTY JEAN& 10321 LAKE DR SE NEWMAN JOAN E& SALEM,OR 97306 LEE ALAN K 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1100C-02200 2S110CA-80481 TIGARD CENTER LP WEBER MABEL L BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 609 KING CITY,OR 97224 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S 110D B-00702 2S 110CA-80811 •RD CENT LP WHIPPLE ALBION&LEAH B BY B ' ' "S REALTY&MNGT CO 8640 SE CAUSEY AVE APT P103 977 ' L :E BLVD STE 609 PORTLAND,OR 97266 VERLY HILL ,CA 90212 251100B-00300 25110CA-80841 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WIESE YVONNE H 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15270 SW CROWN DR TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110D B-90402 2S 110D8-91092 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WILLOUGHBY GEORGE F AND 15485 SW 114TH#40 SYLVIA R TIGARD,OR 97224 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80401 251100 B-90922 TILLOTSON ELSIE WILSON PHYLLIS A 11470 SW CROWN DR#3 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S1100B-90832 2S110CA-80871 TRACY SHARON M ZIEHWEIN TIMOTHY P 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 15290 SW CROWN DR TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 25110CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110CA-80461 WALKER GORDON V& WALKER SUSAN B 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 Sally Christensen Kristen Miller 15685 SW 76th Avenue 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Ann Melvin Bill Finck 10395 SW Bonanza Way 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Stephen Bicker Craig Dirksen 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mark Bogert Paul Owen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady Rick Boyce 9360 SW Edgewood Street 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Bob Oleson 15065 SW 79th Avenue 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Tim and Alison Ross 15374 SW Thurston Lane 10045 SW Serena Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Judith Anderson PO Box 230695 16640 SW Jordan Way Tigard, OR 97281 King City, OR 97224 Stacie Yost Mark Kretzinger 8465 SW Langtree 15136 SW 96th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein Jack Biethan 14630 SW 139th Avenue 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 17-Aug-01 CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,mil PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD Sliapingf7 Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-7297(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) RIIOUEI'$I FOR fit- ¶10 P MAILING LIST Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 15134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): Z,Gz INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 OR 3 SETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on your 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you hn t yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) 4.6-c _P have ,(/,• �`a0 r NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: r, PHONE- )-=, —4= This request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. * EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * * 4 sheets of labels x $2/sheet = $8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 .sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet = $ 71' x 3 sets = 2 sheets of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $4.00 /_sheet(s) of labels x $2/sheet for CIT area = x 3 sets = S GENERATE LIST = $11.00 Pe/ GENERATE LIST = !.�. TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = �� . A!1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ` - CITY OF TIOARD Community cDevefopment Shaping Better Community I, cPatricia L. Luns{ord, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City ofTigar, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Bebw) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR200I-00011/DEIEULLI AUTO SALES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on December 20,2001,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 20,2001, postage prepaid. (Perso at Prepared No -) STATE OAF oGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tward ) / b� C Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (Y day of ,7/l4'kC , 200k. �• OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS •` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 1./1 COMMIS; '.:.:n`.;• ,r MY COMM ISS3 m. .i2. . .. . _. ;. ,2003 / G k\ ' I ' I ; 11 . My Commission Expir �: fI 7 4)_, : �. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 'AY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITAYOFTGARD (/SDR12001-00011 Community Development SDR) Shaping A Better Community DEZFULLI AUTO SALES 120 DAYS =3/15/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: CASE NO: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. APPLICANT: Ebrahim Dezfulli OWNER: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 01200. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 8, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which pro ,s that a written appeal together v the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. l THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 7, 2002. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.men —- fl:,.,/,,,„, / '� N afs 116 ', y `-... `� n �' / 4,-,/-/,. -.,. s 1/44.1 • . I .. CITY OF TIGARD T sDR2oo1•00011 SITE PLAN N DEZFULLI AUTO SALES (Map Is not to scale) _. drintWarlIZIElii VW Ai6b, ull Y ot TIGARD VP VICINITY MAP ', � • � ,� "1116 1,. SDR2001-00011 aim2 Al �• rano2 DELFULLI SWIM .. ct _ 1 AUTO SALES �AIMMME 2� ' P `r' phi .. ! , •- `:. - III � - ,.::.::�,. :: i''''•• s roi #$StIl 0410# 'i,;47,- ., 'ir el] 4.00 ir 03 as . Irlir4 _ ,,, __ , • • •$• ;, . 0 1::::RE:. • .. Ch ofTipd � / • .. • A.* w arr.4.v. , -.....ft; T- `Sok 4260 1- /1 26110D6-90821 2S110CA 80441 EXHA P ADAMS JOSEPH J BRADFISH NORMAN J 15432 SW 114TH CT#82 do NEWLAND BOYDE E TIGARD,OR 97224 14988 SW 109TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-91031 2S110CA-80491 ALDERMAN JOHN BROWN WALTER L&GERALDINE M 15373 SW 114TH CT#103 REVOCABLE TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 15100 SW CROWN DR#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80431 2S110CA-80411 ANDERSON CLAUDIA A BRUTKE CRYSTAL A TRUSTEE 15100 SW CROWN DR#8 PO BOX 51 TIGARD,OR 97224 CARLTON,OR 97111 2S110DB-00200 2S110CA-80561 ARCHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST BURNETT LORETTA C BY PALMER GROTH&PIEKA 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#7 ATTN:TODD S LIEBOW KING CITY,OR 97224 110 SW YAMHILL#200 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 110D B-00200 2S 110DB-90952 • CHSTONE COMMUNITIES TRUST CARMICAL FRED W TR BY ' MERG'% H&PIEKA 15437 SW 114THCT#95 ATTN: :P:, S LIEBOW TIGARD,OR 97224 110 • YA ILL#200 ••RTLAND,OR 97204 2S110DB-90891 2S110CA-80671 ARNDT RAYMOND& CHANEY DAVID F TRUSTEE ARNDT KATHLEEN M& 1186 NW REDFIELD CIR PARR SANDRA A BEND,OR 97701 15437 SW 114TH CT TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80571 2S110CA-80591 BARNA EUGENE A TRUSTEE CHENOWETH MILDRED H 10606 SW CAPITOL HWY#111 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 PORTLAND,OR 97219 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90982 2S 110CA-80601 BARNETT ANGELA COLLIVER WINIFRED R 15435 SW 114TH CT#98 11545 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80741 2S 110CA-80831 BOYD DIANE M COMBS JOYCE M 15215 SW 116TH AVE 15270 SW CROWN DR#4 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90971 2S11008-90842 BOYLE RICHARD 0&BEVERLY J CO- CONNER VERNA D& 3610 LINCOLN AVE HUMPHREY GRETCHEN G TRUSTEES DEPOE BAY,OR 97341 15432 SW 114TH CT#84 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-91b01' 2S 110DB-90381 CURRIE CRAIG H&SHIRLEY A FROST LENA D 10306 E SILVERTREE CT 15485 SW 114TH CT UNIT 38 SUN LAKES,AZ 85248 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 110D B-90962 2S 110CA-80421 CURTIS DAVID L&LYNNE G GILBERT NANCY E TRUSTEE 10215 SW ANDERSON CT 11480 SW CROWN DR#1 TUALATIN,OR 97062 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80881 2S 110CA-80471 DAVIS JAMES M&ESTALENE A GILBERT VIRGINIA LEE 11505 SW TERRA LINDA 15100 SW CROWN DR NO.4 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80801 2S110CA-80691 DENNY ADELE C GRANZOW KENNETH J&JESSIE M 15200 SW CROWN DR 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-00103 2S110CA-80781 DENNY PURKEY LLC GREGG NANCY L 15350 SW 116TH 15255 SW 116TH UNIT#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DB-01200 2S 110DB-91081 DEZFULLI SHAHIN&EBRAHIM HAMMERSCHMITH HELEM M 12587 SW 133RD 15371 SW 114TH CT#108 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80551 2S 110CA-80751 DUSEVOIR EUGENE&EVELYN H HANLEIN JON K 10405 SW DENNEY RD TRLR 59 33 BLANCA DR BEAVERTON,OR 97008 NOVATO,CA 94947 2S 110DB-90811 2S 110DB-91022 FORD DONNA T TRUST HARRISON H FAYE 15432 SW 114TH CT#81 15435 SW 114TH CT#102 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 10DB-9000 2S 110CA-80611 FOU AT SUMMERFIELD CONDO P HATLELI DARLENE 0 RS UNITS 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 , 0 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80761 2S 110CA-80501 FRANK SHIRLEY A HOLMAN WILLIAM C 15215 SW 116TH HOLMAN SUSAN M KING CITY,OR 97224 8040 SW BROADMOOR TERRACE PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S110CA-80531 2S110CA-80901 JIMERSON LAURA LUCILE KREPEL RICHARD M 3607 SW DOSCH RD 36 WESTRIDGE DR PORTLAND,OR 97201 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S110DB-00500 2S110CA-80821 KASCH'S GARDEN&NURSERIES INC LATTANZI JOSEPHINE F 6566 SE LAKE RD#A MORIN RITA K MILWAUKIE,OR 97222 15200 SW CROWN DRIVE#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90991 2S1100B-90941 KESSLER LORRAINE LEVIN DOREEN A 15435 SW 114TH#99 15437 SW 114TH CT#94 TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90371 2S110CA-00100 KINCAID JUANITA LUTON ROBERT C 9850 SW HAWTHORNE LANE c/o KVERNLAND ERIC B PORTLAND,OR 97225 15390 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-00102 2S110DB-91102 KING CITY CITY OF LYNCH MARY LOUISE 15300 SW 116TH 15371 SW 114TH CT#110 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-01600 2S110DB-90912 KING CITY CIVIC ASSOCIATION MARENDISH JOYCE M 15245 SW 116TH 15437 SW 114TH CT#91 KING CITY,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80000 2S110CA-80721 KING CITY CONDO UNIT OWNERS MARTIN CARL W/LORRAINE M BY TUALATIN DEVELOPMENT CO MARTIN CLARA WILMA 15300 SW 116TH AVE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE#3 TIGARD,OR 97223 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110CA-80000 2S110CA-80911 G CITY CON D I UNIT OWNERS MAY JOAN H TRUSTEE BY T • ., •EVELOPMENT CO 15290 SW CROWN DR#1 15301 11. . AVE KING CITY,OR 97224 T ARD,OR 97223 2S 110CA-80000 2S 110DB-90362 G CITY CO 0 UNIT OWNERS MCMULLEN RICHARD D AND BY T DEVELOPMENT CO GERTRUDE M TRUSTEES 1530 116TH AVE 15485 SW 114TH CT#36 T ARD,OR 7223 TIGARD,OR 97224 S110CA-808 2S110CA-80541 KI I CONDOMINIUM MCNUTT HARRY B&IDABELL C OW F UNITS 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-8(3521 2S 110CA-80581 MUNION CATHERINE M REITER EDWARD M 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN#4 11545 MAJESTIC LN#5 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80731 2S 110CA-80851 MURPHY DOROTHY I TRUST RICKNER RICHARD H&JUDI A 15910 SW QUEEN VICTORIA PL 15270 SW CROWN DR KING CITY,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80861 2S 110CA-80791 NESET DAVID N AND BETTY J ROGERS WILLIAM L PMB#319 2155 SW 75TH AVE 15685 SW 116TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97225 PORTLAND,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90901 2S 110CA-80391 O'KEEFFE LIVING TRUST THE ROTHENBERGER ALBERT&DORIS BY ARTHUR F JRNIRGINIA O'KEEFFE TR 11470 SW CROWN DR#4 15437 SW 114TH CT#90 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-01300 2S110DB-91071 PARR-FRANKLIN LLC SCHOUWEILER ALLYN H&JOAN C 330 SW LINCOLN 15371 SW 114TH CT#107 PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80701 2S1 10 D B-90351 PHILLIPS MARY F SCHROEDER MARJORY E TRUSTEE 11530 SW MAJESTIC LANE 15485 SW 114TH CT#35 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110DB-90931 2S110CA-80771 PICKETT GEORGE E& SCHULER PEARL J THELMA E CO-TRUSTEES 15255 SW 116TH AVE#1 15437 SW 114TH CT KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 110C A-80451 2S 110D B-00703 PIO BARBARA J TRUSTEE SFP-B LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 15100 SW CROWN DR#6 1015 MADRAS HWY KING CITY,OR 97224 PRINEVILLE,OR 97754 2S 110D B-91041 2S 110CA-80621 POLLOW NORMA JEANNE SHEVCHENKO EDITH U 15373 SW 114TH CT#104 11545 SW MAJESTIC LN#1 TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110CA-80511 2S1 10D B-91052 RAY ROBERT W&MARY E SKYHAR WILLIAM&GENEVIEVE R TR 11505 SW MAJESTIC LN 809-5 15373 SW 114TH CT#105 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 2S110DB-91012 2S110DB-00704 SPYKER ELINA TRUSTEE WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS SZALOBRYT JANE C TRUSTEE ACCOUNTING DEPT BR 118 15435 SW 114TH CT#101 425 PIKE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 SEATTLE,WA 98101 2S110DB-91062 2S110CA-80711 SZEPESI LESLIE L&MICHELE K WEBER BETTY JEAN& 10321 LAKE DR SE NEWMAN JOAN E& SALEM,OR 97306 LEE ALAN K 11530 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S 110DC-02200 2S 110CA-80481 TIGARD CENTER LP WEBER MABEL L BY BARCLAY'S REALTY&MNGT CO 15100 SW CROWN DR#3 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 609 KING CITY,OR 97224 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S1 10 D B-00702 2S 110CA-80811 •RD CENT-- LP WHIPPLE ALBION&LEAH B BY B•• • 'S REALTY&MNGT CO 8640 SE CAUSEY AVE APT P103 977 L :E BLVD STE 609 PORTLAND,OR 97266 VERLY HILLS,CA 90212 2S110DB-00300 2S110CA-80841 TIGARD COVENANT CHURCH WIESE YVONNE H 11321 SW NAEVE ST 15270 SW CROWN DR TIGARD, OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S110DB-90402 2S110DB-91092 TILLINGHAST RUTH P TRUSTEE WILLOUGHBY GEORGE F AND 15485 SW 114TH#40 SYLVIA R TIGARD,OR 97224 15371 SW 114TH CT#109 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110CA-80401 2S1100B-90922 TILLOTSON ELSIE WILSON PHYLLIS A 11470 SW CROWN DR#3 15437 SW 114TH CT#92 KING CITY,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S110DB-90832 2S110CA-80871 TRACY SHARON M ZIEHWEIN TIMOTHY P 15432 SW 114TH CT#83 15290 SW CROWN DR TIGARD,OR 97224 KING CITY,OR 97224 2S1 10CA-80681 TUPPER RICHARD C& FLORENCE M 11520 SW MAJESTIC LN#2 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S110CA-80461 WALKER GORDON V& WALKER SUSAN B 13900 SW 115TH TIGARD,OR 97223 Sally Christensen Kristen Miller 15685 SW 76th Avenue 8940 SW Edgewood Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mary Ann Melvin Bill Finck 10395 SW Bonanza Way 9235 SW Mountain View Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Stephen Bicker Craig Dirksen 14235 SW 97th Avenue 9131 SW Hill Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Mark Bogert Paul Owen 14445 SW 100th Avenue 10335 SW Highland Drive Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Twyla Brady Rick Boyce 9360 SW Edgewood Street 7800 SW Bond Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Debra Muir Bob Oleson 15065 SW 79th Avenue 9023 SW Reiling Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Sue Siebold Tim and Alison Ross 15374 SW Thurston Lane 10045 SW Serena Way Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tim Esav Judith Anderson PO Box 230695 16640 SW Jordan Way Tigard, OR 97281 King City, OR 97224 Stacie Yost Mark Kretzinger 8465 SW Langtree 15136 SW 96th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein Jack Biethan 14630 SW 139th Avenue 11023 SW Summerfield Drive, #4 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 CITY OF TIGARD - SOUTH CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:lcurpin\setup\labels\CIT South.doc) UPDATED: 17-Aug-01 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community I, cPatricia G. Gun ford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard;Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appupnaae Bo:(s)Below) © NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR200I-00011/DE1FULLI AUTO SALES ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit'B", and by reference made a part hereof, on December 20,2001, and deposited in the United States Mail on December 20,2001, postage prepaid. (Person that Pr ared otice) STATE OE 01Z,EGO7si ) County of Washington )ss. City of Trgarcf Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the tf day of f17(h r[A , 200x. ° OFFICIAL SEAL �_ DIANE M JELDERKS / NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON ' �/ COMMISSION NO.326578 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.07,2003 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OR My Commission Expi : Eg q(7/03 EXHIFTT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00011 •�'i� CITY OF TIGARD DEZFULLI AUTO SALES Community Development Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 3/15/2002 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2001-00011 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. OWNER: Ebrahim Dezfulli APPLICANT: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S110DB, Tax Lot 01200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a Citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 1 OF 23 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: Submit evidence of complying with the following conditions to the Planning Division. Staff contact: Mathew Scheidegger. 1 . Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. 2. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low- lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7-spaces. 3. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 4. Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10- foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. 5. Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. 6. Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. 7. Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. 8. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. 9. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 10. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. 11 . Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. 12. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. 13. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 14. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the street improvement work in SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 2 OF 23 Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 15. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement (if one is required) and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 16. The applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 17. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Division which indicate that they will construct a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include: A. City standard pavement section for a local residential street from curb to centerline equal to 16 feet; B. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and/or subsurface runoff; E. 5 foot concrete sidewalk; F. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; G. street striping; H. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; underground utilities; J. street signs (if applicable); K. driveway apron (if applicable); and L. adjustments in vertical and/or horizontal alignment to construct SW Naeve Street in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. 18. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department indicating that they will construct the following frontage improvements along SW Royalty Parkway as a part of this project: A. 5-foot concrete sidewalk; B. street trees behind the sidewalk spaced per TDC requirements; C. streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; and D. driveway apron (if applicable). 19. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from ODOT for the removal of the existing driveway and culvert along the frontage of SW Pacific Highway. 20. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have obtained ODOT approval for the proposed onsite storm drainage system. 21. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00- 7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 3 OF 23 proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW Naeve Street to increase the right-of-way to 25 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager, 639-4171, ext. 318) for review and approval: 23. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one-year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 24. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) mylars, and 2) a diskette of the as- builts in "DWG" format, if available; otherwise "DXF" will be acceptable. Note: if the public improvement drawings were hand-drawn, then a diskette is not required. 25. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Naeve Street underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $11,550.00 and it shall be paid prior to final inspection. 26. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the Tax Lot (2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200). Based on this search, one (1 ) previous case was found to be associated with the property. CPA91- 00002 was an approval to change the designation of SW Naeve Street from a minor collector to a local street, and by adding a minor collector connection from 1091 Avenue at Murdock Street to Pacific Highway opposite Royalty Parkway and a local street connection between 100th and 1091 Avenue north of SW Hoodview Drive. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 4 OF 23 Vicinity Information: The subject site is located on the east side of SW Pacific Highway. The site is bordered on the south by property zoned General Commercial (C-G) and is separated from the property to the north by SW Naeve Street. The property to the north is zoned R-25 and developed with a church. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET No comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G: General Commercial District. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 5 OF 23 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 33,285 sq.ft. -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width 50 ft 420 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[6] 72 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots [1] - - -Side yard 130 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district 0/20 ft[3] - -Rear yard - 5 ft. -Distance between front of garage& property line abutting a public or private street. - 0/20 ft[3] Maximum Height 45 ft Less than 45 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 85% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 15% As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with t e dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.775, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The applicant has provided plans showing access, egress and circulation from SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. No joint access is proposed at this time. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 6 OF 23 The proposed building is accessible from SW Naeve and SW Royalty Parkway, both of which are public streets that will be maintained as a public street. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The proposed site plan shows curb cuts at the entrance drives to be constructed out of concrete. The driveway approaches are a minimum of 40 feet from the side property lines. The widths of the driveway approaches are 30 feet. Therefore, this standard is met. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; According to the plans submitted, a concrete walkway extends from the main entrance of the proposed sales office to the northern property line and will connect to the proposed sidewalk of SW Naeve Street. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety . Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway crosses a traffic aisle for a distance of 27 feet. Therefore, this standard has been met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The plan depicts that the proposed walkway that connects the sales office to the public right-of-way will be concrete, which meets the standard. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 7 OF 23 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The development has two (2) points of access into the parking lot that are 30 feet wide with 30 feet of pavement. The above standard indicates that a 30-foot-wide access with 24 feet of payment is required. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The entrance drives are designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The proposed access points to the subject property are not considered hazardous or constitute a clear and present danger to the public health. The proposed access drive on SW Naeve is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Naeve and Pacific Highway. The second access point on SW Royalty Parkway is approximately 150 feet from the intersection of SW Royalty Parkway and SW Naeve Street. Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development protects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site plan shows two (2) Karpick Maples along SW Pacific Highway, six (6) Karpick Maples along SW Naeve Street and three (3) along SW Royalty Parkway. The proposed street trees are spaced greater than 30 feet apart. According to Section 18.745.040.C, street NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 8 OF 23 trees that are medium-sized cannot be spaced greater than 30 feet apart. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. The only property abutting the subject site is the nursery to the south, which is also zoned C-G General Commercial. Public streets separate properties to the north, east and west. According to Table 18.745.1 (Buffer Matrix) no buffer is required between parking lots and existing uses within the C-G zone. However, the applicant is proposing a 5-foot buffer between the subject property and the property to the south with Japanese Garden Junipers planted within the buffer. Screening: Special P-rovisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screenin of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant is proposing to screen the parking lot with a minimum of a 5-foot landscaped area surrounding the entire property. However, the applicant has only proposed to plant 2 types of shrubs. According to the criterion, the applicant must effectively screen the facility with a combination of low lying and vertical shrubbery. The Criterion also states that parking lot trees will be planted within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one (1) for every 7 spaces. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 9 OF 23 The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. The applicant has chosen to demonstrate compliance with the Minimum Standards Method. According to Minimum Standards, an office use is required to provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet gross floor area (GFA). The applicant is proposing to develop a 350 square foot building, which will require a 14 square foot storage area. The applicant has proposed a 120 square foot storage area. However, the applicant has not provided a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The refuse container is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse container is located at the south end of the lot and is not adjacent to any public or private street. Screening will be addressed under Section 18.755.050 C (Design Standards) of this decision. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The design standards for the refuse enclosure have not been addressed. Therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position. FINDING: Because the applicant has not provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage design standards, this standard has not been met. If the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be met: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 10 OF 23 CONDITIONS: • Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. • Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence, wall or hedge at least six (6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The proposed use is a used car lot. The applicant is proposing to construct an associated 350 square foot sales office. According to the Off-Street Parking standards a use of this type is required to provide 1 parking stall for every 1 ,000 square feet of building but no less than 4 customer parking stalls. Because the applicant is only proposing a 350 square foot building, only 4 parking stalls will be required. However, the applicant has not indicated which parking stalls will be used for customer parking. Therefore, staff cannot make a finding on whether or not the required parking is within 200 feet from the proposed building. The applicant is required to provide a plan showing 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. To eliminate potential confusion, any customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. Joint Parking_ Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking is not proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Parking in Mixed-Use Projects: In mixed-use projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula. 1) Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 2) Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 90% of the vehicle parking required for that use in Section 18.765.060; 3) Subsequent use or uses, at 80% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4) The maximum parking allowance shall be 150% of the total minimum parking as calculated in D.1.-3. above. The project is not considered a mixed-use project. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 11 OF 23 guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a residential use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed parking lot will not exceed 20 long-term parking spaces. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant is required to provide 4 parking stalls for customer parking. According to the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards, a parking lot with 1-25 parking stalls is required to provide 1 stall that is ADA accessible. The site plan does indicate 1 AD accessible parking stall located 5 feet from the main entrance of the proposed building. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site• the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excludin single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030 groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 12 OF 23 spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. However, the applicant has not indicated that the interior drives or access aisles will be marked to show direction of traffic on the site. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel sto at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant has not addressed wheel stops in the narrative and the site plan does not provide wheel stops. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's plans indicate that all parking stalls will meet the minimum dimensions for standard parking stalls. However, access isles are not consistently 24 feet wide throughout the property. The applicant has been conditioned earlier in this decision to provide information addressing on-site traffic flow. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a motor vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. However, the proposed sales office will be approximately 350 square feet. According to Section 18.765.050.E, the minimum bicycle parking a use may have is 2 stalls. The applicant has shown an area dedicated to bicycle parking, but has not indicated how many parking stalls will be erected. The proposed bicycle parking area is within 50 feet of the primary entrance of the sales office, is visible from the SW Naeve Street and does not block pedestrian traffic. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required -for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 13 OF 23 of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e. pavers asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has not provided a detail of the bike rack to be used, therefore, the applicant will be required to provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C. of the Tigard Development Code. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. As discussed above, according to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for a vehicle sales use is 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed 350 square foot building is required to provide a minimum of a 2 stall bicycle rack, which has been conditioned above. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking for a Vehicle Sales Use is 1.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet but no less than 4.0 and the maximum is 1.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on a 350 square foot building, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls. The applicant has indicated that 4 customer parking stalls will be available. However, staff cannot determine which parking stalls will be used for the required parking. Therefore, the applicant will submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed site will be constructed with a sales office that is 350 square feet. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office. All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. • Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. • Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 14 OF 23 • parking lot to have wheel stops. • Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access isles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic, or allowing access from more than one driveway. All drive isles must be maintained free of parked cars. • Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2 bicycle parking stalls. • Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0 of the Tigard Development Code. • Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has indicated that there are 7 trees located on the proposed site that are greater than 12" in diameter. The applicant has proposed to remove 3 of the trees that are 12 inches in diameter or greater. However, the applicant has not provided an arborist report or a mitigation plan for the site. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have not been fully met. If the applicant complies with the condition listed below, the standards will be met: CONDITION:Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right- of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and the site plan that a clear vision area will be maintained between 3 and 8 feet in height at the vehicular access of the property. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 15 OF 23 C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations);); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (P(Parking); 18.360.090.14 (Landscaping); 18.360.090.15 (Drainage); and 18.360.090.14 rovision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the applicant, the proposed building will have no impact on existing trees located on the site. Drainage is addressed later in this decision under Chapter 18.810 (Street and Utility Improvement Standards). The abutting parcel to the south is developed with a building that is approximately 56 feet away thus providing adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting access. Tree retention is discussed under Chapter 18.790 (Tree Removal) of this decision. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The applicant has indicated that security measures will be addressed, however, the site plan does not show the proposed sales office or indicate parking lot lighting. Therefore, the applicant must submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 16 OF 23 shelters. The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway which is a Tri-Met transit route. However, ODOT did not mention the need for an additional bus stop. The closest bus stop is approximately 500 feet the subject site to the south at the corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW Royalty Parkway. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) Professional Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDITION:Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. D. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030(E) requires a local residential street to have a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Naeve Street, which is classified as a local residential street on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. At present, there is approximately 40 feet of ROW along the frontage of this site. The northerly side of the roadway was improved as a part of the Tigard Covenant Church project. Additional ROW would need to be dedicated adjacent to this site to bring the total ROW width up to 50 feet. SW Naeve Street is currently paved, but not fully improved on the south side adjacent to this site. In order to mitigate the impact from this development, the applicant should complete a half-street improvement. The applicant's plans indicate they will complete the half-street as a part of this project. This site also lies adjacent to SW Royalty Parkway, a minor collector road. There is plenty of ROW adjacent to this site for this roadway, so no additional dedications are required. The City improved this roadway several years ago and there is concrete curb along the majority of the site frontage. The applicant will need to add sidewalk and street trees to bring this roadway up to standard. Their plan shows that they will provide those improvements as a part of this project. SW Pacific Highway is adjacent to the west boundary of this site, and is under ODOT jurisdiction. ODOT staff commented that the applicant should construct frontage NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 17 OF 23 improvements along the highway. However, after City Staff spoke to them, and indicated that the City could not justify such a condition based on the impact of the development, ODOT concurred that frontage improvements are not warranted. ODOT will require the applicant to remove the existing culvert and driveway from SW Pacific Highway. The applicant will need to obtain a permit from ODOT for this work. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. By completing the street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway, the applicant will meet this standard. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public main line in SW Royalty Parkway that the applicant can access for service to this site. The main line has plenty of capacity for this development. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A states requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The sites adjacent to this site are fully developed. No upstream flows impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 18 OF 23 The applicant's plan indicates they will collect their onsite storm water runoff in a pond near the southwest corner of the site where it will be treated before being released into the Pacific Highway ROW. The applicant stated that they have coordinated with ODOT and have designed onsite detention to meet ODOT standards. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant should provide evidence that ODOT has reviewed and approved the proposed storm drainage plan. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Cost of Construction: Section 18.810.110.B states that development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions, and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are associated with this project. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the frontage of SW Naeve Street. If the fee in- lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. The frontage along this site is 420 lineal feet; therefore the fee would be $11 ,550.00. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 19 OF 23 ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Public Water System: This site can be served from the public main line in SW Naeve Street. The applicant's proposed tap of the main line will be covered by the public improvement permit. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan indicates they will provide a vegetated extended dry detention pond for treatment of the stormwater. The preliminary sizing calculations for this pond indicate the applicant has provided adequate room on the site for the pond. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb five or more acres of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A grading/erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The site is less than five acres in size, so a NPDES permit is not necessary. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 20 OF 23 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61 , TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $948 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $2,962 ($948 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $2,014. Tigard's Development Code section 18.810 requires that streets must be Drought up to city standards for a development project to be approved. The applicant has proposed to construct half- street improvements along SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway since this is the frontage from which they are obtaining access. Therefore, this section is satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments. • Why do the plans not indicate a sidewalk along Highway 99W. Please let me know the answer to this question. The City of Tigard Operations Manager has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • Provide easement for water lines in area to be vacated. Update existing water valve boxes, maintain cover over existing water line of 3 feet. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Request lighting plan for exterior. The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: • Building permits required for sales office. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: I have reviewed the submittal for the above named project and have the following comments: 1. The minimum required fire flow is 1500 gpm © 20 psi . Fire District records indicate the NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 21 OF 23 minimum fire flow is available. (UFC Appendix III-A) 2. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901 .4.3) 3. Approved fire apparatus access roadways and firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to stockpiling combustibles on-site or the commencement of combustible construction. (JFC Sec. 8704) 4. A building survey and plans, in accordance with TVF&R Ordinance 99-01 , Appendix III-F, shall be submitted. A copy of Appendix III-F, the building survey form and the instructions are available on the Fire District web site. To access this information via Internet, follow this link: http://www.tvfr.com/Departments/FireMarshal/new construction.htm The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: 1 . The existing culvert and driveway on OR 99W shall be removed and replaced with curb and sidewalk along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA. 2. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way. All plans and specifications must be submitted to the ODOT District 2A office in metric. Dual units are acceptable. 3. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right-of-way. The applicant should provide ODOT District 2A with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right-of-way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right-of-way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1 ,000 square meters. 4. All environmental issues shall be identified and addressed in the final design. Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from affected agencies. Contact Sam Hunaidi, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5002 for information on the written permit application process. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 22 OF 23 Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON DECEMBER 20, 2001 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 8, 2002 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 7, 2002. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. - - December 20, 2001 PREPARED :~: Mathew Sch- dr•ger DATE Assistant Planner ca,/V December 20, 2001 APPROVED BY: Richard H. Be ers rff DATE Planning Manger I:\cu rpl n\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00011.dec.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2001-00011/DEZFULLI AUTO SALES PAGE 23 OF 23 ps 1 I CITY of TIGARD ..t 7-7 '1*, GEOORAPNIC INPORYRTION iYST EY'1*,WILDW nD. ,• VICINITY MAP WIIIIII —I *LEA CT 11111 OP ill r DRS _ S 00 0001 WHIM UNTAIN RD c .,rte DEZFULLI Si I MURDnCK AUTO SALES iiii� WI Pliill:::Iiiii% ... 01 C PFN • `L♦ 'Elpq Iii/Nillp %r�‘ :.:* rt III vv0� -' L0DY it ti � Iligoilli m 'if 00$00 .. .N■■,.•- )4 • N 4 • 4 Ea 3T 0 200 400 600 Feet 1111 q ,' •�, . sue+il.�- �1 ''� _� 1..=405 feet ` N �, ,' Sw ROaw, a ® S.W. NEAVE STREr A . .■. �,.� ,,,. '' '�� is 40 ®■. OOK IPA . City of Tigard �� *air as ■. ��OW:- �♦ ♦ o // ' as U 1Y •OS*. Information on this map Is for general location only and ft)��,,, '' �� y.;� should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW Hall Blvd �., •.' Tigard,OR 97223 AQ�' . i . (503)639-4171 ( httpaAvwnv.ci.9gard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Nov 14,2001;C:lmagic\MAGIC03.APR I / L.,...... i . 4 I X. , ... \` ai / 1� y , / --w13-,- ,;._ „ 't 1 I,i i,:1 f.,II I.t 2r:o 3=I NAN.ii _ . 2T —_ - '1I :....,--.------'—''''''-t''r':.'--',-`.. \N.- -----..'---''-..'./. . • ., -..• - .4, — • Ft 1 ICICLE MO( ,,,, __ .._.. _ -_^__- - r aaoe,,,r ,r r TO it WOW -� / / sus ogger I Pin ACCOS 3 / • ,,;,,,, . . 0.00.0e,°" --....N \ 1 • 4,' Qt . I iirfr 0.0' '-..„..... /lo•e"• /• Y / 1 !ik (QTY OF TIGARD t SDR2001-00011 W""TIGARD SITE PLAN N DEZFULLI AUTO SALES (Map is not to scale) EXIT Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue SDR2001-00011 Tigard, OR 97223 DEZFULLI AUTO SALES ODOT, Region 1 Marah Danielson, Development Review 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 r ` r PM 1,3 ---`--._. -,. 01044, - • I. clTv OF riGAk_ cc ° zo DEC ---° °� . . kr. RECEIVED PLANNING 25 ` -IALL: J. _.. ,,BARD, L; 97223 DEC 2 7 2001 CITY OF TIGARD CO) • 1,69414(d1r4 2./ .g.-C' ) 1 . 0 6/.1.-.1 (ilia ... rb /kw 9,870 _.... DR ? ( - ( I NEWL9dc�'* 9722430 79 1000 14 12/23/01 (✓� 1 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND NEWLAND ' BOYDE EVERETT 15135 SW 116TH AVE UNIT 2 PORTLAND OR 97224-2670 RETURN TO SENDER TB- - --._ 25 is i .1ALL L_' D. \ ,3ARD, OR 97223 ',.? -,.------ "' -r--- 1 re''\ \ \ 4\ -L. cl\.) <A41,1," (1c ,1J) Ck\3i.°.. ..4./:* \`)11 ! . MELV395 972243024 1A00 17 12/23/01 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND MELVIN 6 TIGARD SW 12722 -3R TIGARD OR 9722�F-3071 RETURN TO SENDER ! I ._ -.__..s."f4a:c- r-._ ii!i!d!!! !:I:fE!I!i!! lihdi!!!Iii:l!0!I: hid ti . . SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TYPE II APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: ,t1zJ c_c DATE OF PRE-APP.: 4.4-. Q/ Property Address/Location(s): 5.bJ. ce- T p� 4,4 clual li;9 • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 77_ /2 Case No.(s): S.,] O r -0 Other Case No.(s): 7104 Site Size: _ Receipt No.: g cA 1 3 7 Application Accepted By:0 Applicant*: t 6r�i7�.1 p,_, Date: °/ /Z1 Address: /ZS-1;37 • Date Determined Complete: //1/4511-1/ City/State: �ico( or. Zip: c1-772"c Rev.8/21/2001 i kurpin\masters\revised\sdra.doc Primary Contact: Phone:��O3) Sa -5433 Fax: REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)*: (Attach list if more than one) (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Address: Phone: [application Form City/State: Zip: Dr Owner's Signature/Written Authorization El/Title Transfer Instrument or Deed * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant d Copy of Pre Application Conf. Notes must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) O-Site/Plot Plan must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this (#of copies based on pre-app check list) form or submit a written authorization with this application. [E Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'/,"x 11") PROPOSAL SUMMARY [lr Applicant's Statement (#of copies based on pre-app check list) The owners of record of the subject property request Site CWS Sewer Use Information Card Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): (Distributed/completed at application submittal) •5 _4(c:E> - ��/ El7f CWS Service Provider Letter a--2-Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped #10 Envelopes & Copy of 500' Property Owner List Generated by the City E Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits & Notes © Filing Fee: (Under$100,000) $ 800.00 ($100.000-$999,999) $1,600.00 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000 over the first million) Urban: (See Washington County fee schedule) 1 List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: /�/O✓}c APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this - ; day of ( , 20 a dr A IC Owner's Signature / � Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 CK I� 97 4 255-SS ;( TRUST DEED STATE OF OREGON, County of } ss• PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTY EXCHANGE I certify that the within instrument CORPORATION was received for record on the day of , 19 ,at o'clock .M., and recorded in Grantor's Name and Address SPACE RESERVED book/reel/volume No. on page EBRAHIM DEZFULLI FOR and/or as fee/file/instru- SHAHIN DEZFULLI RECORDER'S USE ment/microfilm/reception No. Beneficiary's Name and Address Record of of said County. Atter recording,return to(Name,Address,Zip): Witness my hand and seal of County PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTY EXCHANGE affixed. 900 SW FIFTH PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 NAME TITLE By , Deputy. THIS TRUST DEED made this (' da of... UI1L. .... ,19 97 ,between PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTY EXCHANGE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ,as Grantor, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON ,as Trustee,and EBRAHIM DEZFULLI AND SHAHIN DEZFULLI ,as Beneficiary, WI TNESSETH: Grantor irrevocably grants, bargains, sells and conveys to trustee in trust, with power of sale, the property in MULTNOMAH County, Oregon,described as: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" MADE A PART HEREIN. together with all and singular the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances and all other rights thereunto belonging or in anywise now or hereafter appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof and all fixtures now or hereafter attached to or used in connection with the property. FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING PERFORMANCE of each agreement of grantor herein contained and payment of the sum of Dollars, with interest thereon according to the terms of a promissory note of even date herewith, payable to beneficiar or order and made b grantor the final payment of principal and interest hereof, if i not sooner paid, to be due and payable upon sale or secured property . The date of maturity of the debt secured by this instrument is the date, stated above, on which the final installment of the note becomes due and payable. To protect the security of this trust deed,grantor agrees: 1. To protect, preserve and maintain the property in good condition and repair; not to remove or demolish any building or im- provement thereon; not to commit or permit any waste of the property. 2. To complete or restore promptly and in good and habitable condition any building or improvement which may be constructed, damaged or destroyed thereon, and pay when due all costs incurred therefor. 3. To comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations,covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property;if the beneficiary so requests, to join in executing such financing statements pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code as the beneficiary may require and to pay for filing same in the proper public office or offices, as well as the cost of all lien searches made by filing officers or searching agencies as may be deemed desirable by the beneficiary. 4. To provide and continuously maintain insurance on the buildings now or hereafter erected on the property against loss or damage by fire and such other hazards as the beneficiary may from time to time require, in an amount not less than $ written in companies acceptable to the beneficiary, with loss payable to the latter;all policies of insurance shall be delivered to the bene- ficiary as soon as insured;if the grantor shall fail for any reason to procure any such insurance and to deliver the policies to the beneficiary at least fifteen days prior to the expiration of any policy of insurance now or hereafter placed on the buildings, the beneficiary may pro- cure the same at grantor's expense. The amount collected under any fire or other insurance policy may be applied by beneficiary upon any indebtedness secured hereby and in such order as beneficiary may determine, or at option of beneficiary the entire amount so collected, or any part thereof, may be released to grantor. Such application or release shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default here- under or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice. 5. To keep the property free from construction liens and to pay all taxes, assessments and other charges that may be levied or assessed upon or against the property before any part of such taxes, assessments and other charges become past due or delinquent and promptly deliver receipts therefor to beneficiary; should the grantor fail to make payment of any taxes,assessments,insurance premiums, liens or other charges payable by grantor, either by direct payment or by providing beneficiary with funds with which to make such pay- ment, beneficiary may, at its option, make payment thereof, and the amount so paid, with interest at the rate set forth in the note secured hereby, together with the obligations described in paragraphs 6 and 7 of this trust deed, shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured by this trust deed, without waiver of any rights arising from breach of any of the covenants hereof and for such payments, ' with interest as aforesaid, the property hereinbefore described, as wall as the grantor, shall he bound to the same nvtent the* they are bound for the payment cf the obligation herein described, a^d all such payments mall be immediately due and payable without notice, i and the no.ipayment thereof shall, at the op;ion of the beneficiary, render *1l1 sums 3ocured by this trust dead immediately due and pay- able and.:onstitute a breach of this trust deed. 6. To pay all costs, tees and expenses of this trust including the cost of title search as w other costa and expenses of the trustee incurred in connection with or in enforcing this obligation and trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred. 7. To appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security rights or powers of beneficiary or trustee; and in any suit, action or proceeding in which the beneficiary or trustee may appear, including any suit for the foreclosure of this deed or any suit or action related to this instrument, including but not limited to its validity and/or enforceability, to pay all costs and ex- penses, including evidence of title and the beneficiary's or trustee's attorney fees; the amount of attorney fees mentioned in this para- graph 7 in all cases shall be fixed by the trial court and in the event of an appeal from any judgment or decree of the trial court,grantor further agrees to pay such sum at the appellate court shall adjudge reasonable as the beneficiary's or trustee's attorney fees on such appeal. It is mutually agreed that: 8. In the event that any portion or all of the property shall be taken under the right of eminent domain or condemnation, bene- ficiary shall have the right, if it so elects, to require that all or any portion of the monies payable as compensation for such taking, NOTE: The Trust Deed Act provides that the trustee hereunder must be either an attorney, who is an active member of the Oregon State Bar, a bank, trust company or savings and loan association authorized to do business under the laws of Oregon or the United States, a title insurance company autho- rized to insure tills to real property of this state, its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents or branches, the United States or any agency thereof, or an escrow agent licensed under ORS 696.505 to 696.585. which are in excess of the amount required to pay all reasonable costs, expenses and attorney's fees necessarily paid or incurred by grantor in such proceedings, shall be paid to beneficiary and applied by it first upon any reasonable costs and expenses and attorney's fees, both in the trial and appellate courts,necessarily paid or incurred by beneficiary in such proceedings,and the balance applied upon the indebted- ness secured hereby; and grantor agrees, at its own expense, to take such actions and execute such instruments as shall be necessary in obtaining such compensation, promptly upon beneficiary's request. 9. At any time and from time to time upon written request of beneficiary, payment of its fees and presentation of this deed and the note for endorsement (in case of full reconveyances, for cancellation), without affecting the liability of any person for the payment of the indebtedness, trustee may (a) consent to the making of any map or plat of the property; (b)join in granting any easement or creat- ' ing any restriction thereon; (c) join in any subordination or other agreement affecting this deed or the lien or charge thereof; (d) ' reconvey, without warranty, all or any part of the property. The grantee in any reconveyance may be described as the "person or persons 11 legally entitled thereto," and the recitals therein of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. Trustee's fees for any of the services mentioned in this paragraph shall be not less than $5. 10. Upon any default by grantor hereunder, beneficiary may at any time without notice, either in person, by agent or by a receiver to be appointed by a court, and without regard to the adequacy of any security for the indebtedness hereby secured, enter upon and take �i possession of the property or any part thereof, in its own name sue or otherwise collect the rents, issues and profits, including those past due and unpaid, and apply the same, less costs and expenses of operation and collection, including reasonable attorney's fees upon any indebtedness secured hereby, and in such order as beneficiary may determine. 11. The entering upon and taking possession of the property, the collection of such rents, issues and profits, or the proceeds of fire and other insurance policies or compensation or awards for any taking or damage of the property,and the application or release thereof as I aforesaid, shall not cure or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice. I 12. Upon default by grantor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in grantor's performance of any agreement hereunder,time i; being of the essence with respect to such payment and/or performance, the beneficiary may declare all sums secured hereby immediately 1 due and payable. In such an event the beneficiary may elect to proceed to foreclose this trust deed in equity as a mortgage or direct the I trustee to foreclose this trust deed by advertisement and sale, or may direct the trustee to pursue any other right or remedy, either at I, law or in equity, which the beneficiary may have. In the event the beneficiary elects to foreclose by advertisement and sale, the bene- �i ficiary or the trustee shall execute and cause to be recorded a written notice of default and election to sell the property to satisfy the obliga- i I tion secured hereby whereupon the trustee shall fix the time and place of sale, give notice thereof as then required by law and proceed i to foreclose this trust deed in the manner provided in ORS 86.735 to 86.795. 1 13. After the trustee has commenced foreclosure by advertisement and sale, and at any time prior to 5 days before the date the I trustee conducts the sale, the grantor or any other person so privileged by ORS 86.753, may cure the default or defaults. If the default 1 consists of a failure to pay, when due, sums secured by the trust deed, the default may be cured by paying the entire amount due at the i time of the cure other than such portion as would not then be due had no default occurred. Any other default that is capable of being cured may be cured by tendering the performance required under the obligation or trust deed. In any case, in addition to curing the de- I fault or defaults, the person effecting the cure shall pay to the beneficiary all costs and expenses actually incurred in enforcing I the obligation of the trust deed together with trustee's and attorney's fees not exceeding the amounts provided by law. 14. Otherwise, the sale shall be held on the date and at the time and place designated in the notice of sale or the time to which the sale may be postponed as provided by law. The trustee may sell the property either in one parcel or in separate parcels and shall sell I the parcel or parcels at auction to the highest bidder for cash, payable at the time of sale. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser its deed ! in form as required by law conveying the property so sold, but without any covenant or warranty, express or implied. The recitals in the deed of any matters of fact shall be conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. Any person, excluding the trustee, but including the grantor and beneficiary, may purchase at the sale. I 15. When trustee sells pursuant to the powers provided herein, trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of (1) the ex- penses of sale, including the compensation of the trustee and a reasonable charge by trustee's attorney, (2) to the obligation secured by I' the trust deed, (3) to all persons having recorded liens subsequent to the interest of the trustee in the trust deed as their interests may ' appear in the order of their priority and (4) the surplus, if any, to the grantor or to any successor in interest entitled to such surplus. 16. Beneficiary may from time to time appoint a successor or successors to any trustee named herein or to any successor trustee appointed hereunder. Upon such appointment, and without conveyance to the successor trustee, the latter shall be vested with all title, powers and duties conferred upon any trustee herein named or appointed hereunder. Each such appointment and substitution shall be made by written instrument executed by beneficiary, which, when recorded in the mortgage records of the county or counties in which the property is situated, shall be conclusive proof of proper appointment of the successor trustee. 17. Trustee accepts this trust when this deed, duly executed and acknowledged,is made a public record as provided by law. Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any other deed of trust or of any action or proceeding in which grantor, beneficiary or trustee shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is brought by trustee. The grantor covenants and agrees to and with the beneficiary and the beneficiary's successor in interest that the grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the real property and has a valid, unencumbered title thereto, except as may be set forth in an addendum or exhibit attached hereto, and that the grantor will warrant and forever defend the same against all persons whomsoever. WARNING: Unless grantor provides beneficiary with evidence of insurance coverage as required by the con- tract or loan agreement between them, beneficiary may purchase insurance at grantor's expense to protect bene- ficiary's interest. This insurance may,but need not, also protect grantor's interest. If the collateral becomes damaged, the coverage purchased by beneficiary may not pay any claim made by or against grantor. Grantor may later cancel the coverage by providing evidence that grantor has obtained property coverage elsewhere. Grantor is responsible for the cost of any insurance coverage purchased by beneficiary, which cost may be added to grantor's contract or loan balance. If it is so added, the interest rate on the underlying contract or loan will apply to it. The effective date of coverage may be the date grantor's prior coverage lapsed or the date grantor failed to provide proof of coverage. The coverage beneficiary purchases may be considerably more expensive than insurance grantor might otherwise obtain alone and may not satisfy any need for property damage coverage or any mandatory liability insurance re- quirements imposed by applicable law. The grantor warrants that the proceeds of the loan represented by the above described note and this trust deed are: (a)*primarily for grantor's personal, family or household purposes (see Important Notice below), (b) for an organization, or (even if grantor is a natural person) are for business or commercial purposes. This deed applies to, inures to the benefit of and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors. personal representatives, successors and assigns. The term beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner, including pledgee, of the contract secured hereby, whether or not named as a beneficiary herein. In construing this trust deed, it is understood that the grantor, trustee and/or beneficiary may each be more than one person; that if the context so requires, the singular shall be taken to mean and include the plural, and that generally all grammatical changes shall be made, assumed and implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and todiinydiviiduualls.ar�f� Q IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed tt Ai, p CAA Et s da,, fig K I i rs ptlikA itien,CORPORATIC *IMPORTANT NOTICE:Delete,by lining out,whichever warranty (a)or(b) is not applicable; if warranty (a) is applicable and the beneficiary is a creditor iSa �ij� as such word is defined in the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z, the BY �'J beneficiary MUST comply with the Act and Regulation by making required v�7 disclosures; for this purpose use Stevens-Ness Form No. 1319, or equivalent. I C t 3 If compliance with the Act is not required, disregard this notice. ..T.I.TLE:..A.v-1 STATE OF OREGON, County of.._MU.LTNOMAH_ )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on - ,19 �./ by—.�2 i tim�ntco gee before me ona ,1 ?,/, ...-7 -z...., OFFICIAL SEA ..t i ,.7 f0", D0RE�LF... :1 I NOTARY PU c 0''•--„u� (/ . OM SOMMISSIO •: - fME-RI.C.AN_PRORERTY...EXCHANG,E...0 t!Put RAT.. MY COMMISSION EXPIRIe• : •r Notary Publi for Oregon My corn fission expires REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE (To be used only when obligations have been paid.) FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE OF OREGON Ili TO: ,Trustee The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of all indebtedness secured by the foregoing trust deed. All sums secured by the trust deed have beer. :`.::.T -aid and satisfied. You hereby are directed, on payment to you of arty sums owing to you under the terms of the trust deed or pursuant to statute, to cancel all evidences of indebtedness secured by the trust deed (which are delivered to you herewith together with the trust deed) and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of the trust deed the estate now hold by you under the same. Mail reconveyance and documents to PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTY EXCHANGE CORPORATION DATED: ,19 i Do not lose or destroy this Trust Deed OR THE NOTE which it secures. EBRAHIM DEZFtJtL I I Hgfh must be delivered to the trustee for cancellation before I re o vey°nce will be made. SHAHIN DEZFULLI Beneficiary . 706255-SS EXHIBIT "A" Ttie:Bast'85_ feet of Lots 1, 2,. 3 and 4,..Block 97 WEST PORTLAND ::PARKi'. in=the`City of Portland, County of Multnomah and State of Or •goni.".TOCETBER'.-AZTB.. ::n :,easement: for driveway, parking and uti•iitiea'`deacr..'' ed I as-,follova: :.A .tract' of land situated in Sectior. 31,, Tevnship•1 South, Range >L Eeat"of the Willamette.Meridian,. Multnomah County, Oregon, ;being.='a:'part. of Lots: 9: and I0, Block 97, WEST'PORTLAND PARK, �eleo�._being .that certain tract of -.land surveyed. by Andy Paris, ,Oregon',sP.rofeaeional..Land• Sucveyor'NO.:::289, and shown on the Record i!O•f:Survey.'for,:..Victoria:.Moritz;; dated rebruary.24., 1982,. :said`";;tract of land'. being more particularly 'described as -"fohover-.to=wit: • :Baginnincg at a. 5/8 inch iron rod on the Southerly right of way 1inwi' of� S.W:::Vesta Street, said iron rod is South 88°22'08" felt • from. the Northveat corner of said Lot 9: 'thance`SOUth:88 •22'08" Bast along the Southerly right of way •:linee':of•.Yeeta Street, :12:53 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod: thence 1eay.ing.:• the'said Southerly right of way line, South 15021 '30" weer. 31:64 feet to:*•a 5/8 inch iron rod: thence South 27 15' fveet�;..'33:06 'feet :toga 5/8 inch iron rod:: thence South 100031 Nest.;=;,-24: 59;'•feet to a-.5/8•inch iron rod; thence North 80°56' <'Neet= ,-` 7:54=•feet:to A 5/$ inch iron rod:'on the West line of :said:i:ot 9: •t''+enee North 1 30'18" Eaat along the west line of :eaid'LOt`9, 38.00 feet to a 5/8oinch iron rod; thence leaving ?ttie:?aidy.Wost. lot line, North 7$ 12' East, 14.47 feet to a 5/8 `inch`�irOn'rod; thence .North 3V410•45'' East 19.71 feet to a 5/8 ;'i'ncti::tron. rods thence. North 14 38' •East, 25.46 feet to the •place of beginning: DEMAND NOTE $ Portland, Oregon ON DEMAND, the undersigned hereby promises to pay to the order of EBRAHIM DEZFULLI and SHAHIN DEZFULLI at Portland, Oregon Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of-0-%percent per annum. All or any portion of the principal hereof may be paid at any time. This note is secured by a trust deed on property commonly known as: 4834 SW Vesta Street, Portland, Oregon, . Holder's sole recourse shall be against said property and Maker shall have no personal obligation or liability to Holder hereunder. PAPEC File No. 9706255-SS Pacific American Property Exchange Corporation By:Udridif Title:>4561Stafra-(4Cj central/demand.doc 11/96d1 a /1�arraTive September 25, 2001 SUMMARY Applicant Ebriham Dezfulli 12587 S.W. 133rd Ave. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Property Address N/A—S.E. Corner of S.W. Naeve St. and S.W. Highway 99 Legal Description 2S1 10DB TL1200 Site Size 0.90 Ac. Zoning Designation C-G Proposal Description Construct Retail Used Automobile Sales Lot Necessary Applications Site Development Review APPLICANTS REQUEST Ebrahim Dezfulli is requesting permission to build a used automobile sales lot, a 350 square foot sales office and associated utilities, and a storm water quality facility to treat runoff from newly created impervious surfaces. APPLICABLE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE APPROVAL CRITERIA This request requires Site Development Review approval. Applicable Development Code Standards are as follows: • Site Development Review (18.360) • Decision-Making Procedures (18.390) • Commercial Zoning Districts (18.520) • Access, Egress, and circulation(18.705) • Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) • Exceptions to Development Standards (18.730) • Landscaping and Screening(18.745) • Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage (18.755) • Off-street Parking and Loading(18.765) • Signs (18.780) • Tree Removal (18.790) • Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) • Street and Utility Improvement Standards (18.800) • Neighborhood Meeting ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 18.32 Narrative: The following code sections have been addressed: 18.360: Site Development Review—Approval Criteria 1. The proposed development has been designed to comply with the City of Tigard Development Code. Appropriate dedication will be done to comply with public right of way requirements. 2. Building location shall be accomplished with as little impact to the site as possible, and oriented such to best utilize the site. No wetlands are present on the site. Some existing trees will be removed and mitigated for, as depicted on the Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control,Tree Removal Plan. 3. Buffering and screening as required is shown on the appropriate plan. 4. Privacy/multi-family: N/A 5. Shared outdoor area/multi-family: N/A 6. Shared outdoor recreation/multi-family: N/A 7. No open areas are available on this site. 8. Structures and areas on the site are clear to use, and all areas will be designated as to public or private areas. 9. The building has been designed to UBC code requirements and should provide adequate security and safety measures. Parking areas and building perimeter areas will be lit according to standard business practices. 10. Public transit is available on S.W. Highway 99 with bus stops located at the intersection of the highway and S.W. Beef Bend Rd. and at S.W. Royalty Parkway. 11. Landscaping— 15%of the site area is shown as new landscaping. 12. Site drainage has been shown on the Preliminary Street& Storm Plan. A water quality facility has been designed according to USA standards. Storm runoff will be treated prior to discharge into the public roadside ditch. 13. The building has been designed to meet ADA standards. Accessible parking spaces have been provided with the required accessible connections to the building. 14. The building has been designed and located according to current zoning regulations. 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures—This application is for a Type II procedure, site development review. A neighborhood meeting has been held as required. Appropriate applications have been submitted, along with plans and this narrative as required. 18.520: Commercial Zoning Districts—The proposed construction is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zone. The proposed construction has been designed for an automobile sales use, which is permitted in this zone. Development standards have been met as shown on the site plan, and as described previously in this narrative. 18.705: Access. Egress and Circulation—Two driveways are proposed for the accessways and egressways into the proposed site. The proposed driveways are 30' in width with a pavement width of 24' minimum. Pedestrian access to the public right-of-way has been maintained with striping across the lot. 18.725: Environmental Performance Standards—The intended use for this development will be in compliance with subsection 18.725.03 18.730: Exceptions to Development Standards—No exceptions are being sought with this application. 18.745: Landscaping and Screening— 15%of the site is landscaped as required by the City of Tigard Development standards 18.755: Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage—For this project, the minimum standards are being used for the design. The garbage enclosure is 10' by 12' by 6' in height. 18.765: Off Street Parking and Loading—Four parking spaces (one ADA accessible) are designated on the site plan to meet the minimum requirement. 18.780: Signs—A free standing sign is proposed in compliance with 18.780.130. Sign permits will be applied for at the time of building permit application. 18.790: Tree Removal—The Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control and tree removal Plan show existing trees, including trees greater than or equal to 12-inch caliper that are proposed to be retained or removed. There are 7 trees of 12-inches or greater in diameter located on the site. 3 of the 7 trees greater than or equal to 12-inches diameter must be removed to accommodate the site development. Fifty-seven percent of the trees greater than or equal to 12-inches in diameter have been retained, so tree mitigation of 50 percent of the trees to be removed is required. According to 18.790.060D, the number of replacement trees required is determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree to be removed by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement tree. The total caliper of the trees removed is 50-inches. Half of 50 is 25. The applicant has proposed to plant 5 (five) 2-inch caliper and 15 (fifteen) 1-inch caliper Red Alder trees. 18.795: Visual Clearance Areas—The visual clearance triangles for the two site accesses have been maintained per code requirements. 18.800: Street and Utility Improvements— Street Improvements: Half street improvements are required along the frontage of S.W. Naeve Street, including a 5' wide curb-tight sidewalk. Partial improvements along S.W. Royalty Parkway require a 5' wide sidewalk to be constructed. Those improvements are shown on the Preliminary Street & Storm Drain Plan. Overhead Utilities: The existing overhead power lines along S.W. Naeve Street are required to be relocated underground of a fee-in-lieu paid. The applicant is proposing to pay the fee-in-lieu of. Sanitary Sewer: A sanitary sewer service line is proposed to connect the office space to an existing 8"public sewer main located in S.W. Naeve Street. This improvement is shown on the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer& Water Plan. Water Supply: A water service line is proposed to connect the office space to an existing water main in S.W. Naeve Street. Irrigation service is proposed to branch off the service line behind the water meter. These improvements are shown on the Preliminary Sanitary Sewer& Water Plan. Storm Sewer/Storm Water Quality Improvements: The storm water collection system and storm water quality pond is shown on the submitted plan set. It has been sized and designed to meet the City's development standards. Detention has been provided to meet current Oregon State Department of Transportation standards. 18.390.040, 18.390.050: Impact Study—The proposed development is for an auto retail sales lot accessing both S.W. Naeve Street and S.W. Royalty Parkway. Particular areas of interest to the City are as follows: Transportation System: A traffic analysis report has been prepared by a licensed Oregon traffic engineer. This report indicates that there are no adverse impacts or special improvements required by this development. Drainage System: Stormwater runoff will be treated in a water quality facility and detained to meet applicable requirements. Parks: The nature of this development should have no impacts to local parks. Water: The proposed water connection will require a live tap to an existing water main. Water usage is anticipated to be minimal. These conditions will have no adverse impacts to the public water system. Sewer: The proposed service line will require a new connection to the existing sewer main in S.W. Naeve Street. Anticipated flows from said service line will be minimal and should have no impact to the public sewer system. Noise: No noise impacts are anticipated from this development. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held at the Tigard First Baptist Church Room MC 205 at 7:00 p.m. on Friday, September 1st. There were no attendees and no written comments were received. The affidavit of mailing, the affidavit of posting, a copy of the meeting letter, and labels have been provided with this application as required. Subdivision Plat Name Reservation: N/A,per pre-application meeting Building Permits: Building permits will be sought for the proposed construction only After Land Use Approvals have been obtained Additional Concerns or Comments: As described in the pre-application notes "Sales office must be permanent"—The proposed plan depicts a permanent structure for the sales office. it'll 4 . Mr fl / ig -<.. ' / ixi 5 1 .0, 4 1 ,_-,ri-/ i '....,,, $ .... \ 1 0' // 4 la ` :;000 Is i .816 ` a I ` moor)sr cu*4 insourmarmamvx" 00.9 ft � ■ %� i' j r"te 41111 I / �` 1��fLr' •. . r . 'OW WO a�onenes mtww a► fl li 1:16 IN=_ $, kJ/ / i 0 Z \ 87,_,.\.e. Q ti i � l\ \k \�ti ` � I h - - 't4, . ,, I ;7 / \ \4+ off' r �r • TWOS 011idY • e `'4` / I/ iii •b it ,\ �v�r 011■5 i 1 1 11/07/2001 13: 21 FAX 5032266006 Portland TranSystems al001 r',-" 614 SW Eleventh Avenuc �QM ^'( ?Or T srE .s Princeton Building, Suite 401 MUkn"0£y£6�P N/ ��C�1PO/-?.CT/ON I___ Portland OR 97205 M£ - Phonc: (503) 226-4200 FAX: (503) 226-6006 FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM To: 74- e opq.ate" Dare: 61 . 7. 0( From: r-t[ �c9' °" Project#: Fax: � • _.♦ Pages: 4 (including cover sheet) Subject: I s. ..r t / ._ dlOr . 1. / /0 - ��Z 2C 1— o-.s/7 Comments. �t /Ale' 4ai I .1/ti . './ _�►�l,rl [� 4 ii _ /i c.tau//. . _ -� -71141 I. ./. . /_ • - '/A. 44'0'0 t 11/07/2001 13:21 FAX 5032266006 Portland TranSystems U002 November 6, 2001 Dezfulli Auto Sales Facility Tigard Oregon SDR2001-00011 Preliminary Storm Water Quality Calculations WQV (water quality volume)=0.36"x 24,850 s.f / 12"per ft. =914 c.f WQF (water quality flow)= 745 c.f./ 14,400 sec. = 0.0518 cfs Assume: Extended dry basin treatment facility Temporary detention height of 3' Orifice size D= 24* [(0.0518/(2g2')15)/i)os = 0.91" 11/07/2001 13:21 FAX 5032266006 Portland TranSystems 0003 J * Summary of Results • Project : dez Run Name : Run 1 Start of Run : 01NOv01 0800 Basin Model : Basin 1 Bad of Run : 02Nov01 0800 Met. Model : Met 1 Execution Time : 07NOv01 1116 Control Specs : Control 1 Hydrologic Discharge Time of Volume Drainage Element Peak Peak (ac Area (cfs) ft) (sq mi) Subbasin-1 1.4231 01 Nov 01 2000 0.12768 0.001 ' g.i=C rUrt 11/07/2001 13:21 FAX 5032266006 Portland TranSystems Ej004 Dezfulli Auto Sales Facility Tigard Oregon SAR2001-00011 Preliminary detention volume calculation ' TR 55 210_EXE NE 77:-55 STORAi:2. UOLUMF7 FOR DETEN1IO4 BASIS,M U :sion 2,.1.17 ,�o t rglt- >>>)) Identification Data ««< Date 11-07-2001 ;i ir"s'o3; c L dez County uta4.lt 5tl'.:e or 3uhtit le >>>>> Basic Data, <<<<< Drainage Area ..7. . Aeri.:s or . . - Sq.Mi- RainrAi1-Ty;e «„IA.III.1I1) I I - _ I-Runoff = 3.27 inches RainfA11 Frequency 25 - years 24-f'r.ur Rainfall 3.5 - finches ,Runoff - - • • inches Runoff Cu:.•^xe Number 98 l'ec1s Inflow 1.42 cfs Peak Outflow .6 - - • c 's Dete.btion Basin :,toraqe Uolasne - - • inches or .- • - Acre-feet etasin o�•ay 1.01 inches or 0.1 acre fc s any key to continue Press NUM L!, ;;IT-il(Wii- rTt .--6--0-i;ne: U Hot P1-iae8: Iac;d Save DOS L��•o 1 —.......,. onote:: : * -r,,-SS rei/l A \V1ATO& 614 SW Eleventh Avenue ARRENL u Princeton Building, Suite 401 A Division of TranSystems Corporation Portland OR 97205 Phone: (503) 226-4200 FAX: (503) 226-6006 � - 1 TRANSMITTAL FORM To: A/i>0/t / ��' f��.lG Date: ( 8• c) „gyp Project #: /-» if emirs F .44-7. Sri, Z70 Pages: /-ki t)(7/7--2 -2r 97 ,C4 (including cover sheet) Fax - - Number: ( - ) Eck-, _ js Via: Mail ( ) FAX ( y� ) From: � � Other ( ) Subject: � � � � c .:rat Comments: / • / I lLr l - sG�7/L5d7JG G.f�/'r.� Q4-. G /1 r.cd- 1l r u-- Vtt-i/I P14 GAMS Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County Sensitive Areas Certification Form Property Owner Name Address /0587 5_ GJ. /33'' City/State/Zip I fgcirc( Or. 9-7223 Telephone Fax .• 03 - 524-5433 - E•mai! _ Authorized Agent Name ndr� �(f• dC-rcr Address City/State/Zip -f-IraA ( Or. C177-06- Telephone Fax X03-22�-4Za7 -s_3- z z :, E-mail rfi r -,+�ts��f-�. w Project Location Street,road,or other descriptive location - Legal Description:- -� J Quarter I-Section Township Range t (0 I 2-5 /L�! In or near(city or town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# c�a �i�q IrLtrrrl�o►ti I 1200 - waterrrh y J River Mile J Latitude Longitude Al/A. Ai/A Adjacent Property Information: • Street, road,or other descriptive location Legal Description: Cuarer I Township hip Range (0 I Ir cr rear(city or town) County Tax Map T Tax Lot Y vrr� �lL` ;,a:e way_; �j I River Mile J Latitude Longitude / ' to • • sx An on-site,water-,_.ality-sensitive area reconnaissance was .mpleted on: Date By - Title Company EP • .#.• A. Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined t USA's Design and Construction Standards, water-quality-sensitive areas: ❑ do (Odo not exist on site(check appropriate box). ❑ do co not exist within 200' on adjacent properties, or❑ unable to evaluate adjacent property(check appropriate box). _ • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist, complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist, skip Section B, sign this form and submit to USA with plan approval package. B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s)of water-quality-sensitive area(s) that occur on site or within 200 ft on adjacent properties are (check all that apply): ❑wetland(s) ❑ spring(s) ❑ intermittent stream(s) ❑ perennial stream(s) ❑ ponds Sign this form and submit to USA with plan approval package and one (1)copy of the Natural Resources Assessment Report(information and forms are available through USA). • The Natural Resources Assessment Report includes: • Wetland Delineation Report per DSO/Corps reporting requirements (if wetlands present). • Rapid Stream Assessment Technique Form and maps(if where construction or discharge is proposed into, through, or across an intermittent or perennial streams). • Vegetated corridor documentation, including a base map and photographs showing the surveyed location of all sensitive areas, vegetated corridors, and vegetated corridor condition. I certify that I information contained in this document, end to th best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. Property Owner: Print/Type Name Print/Type Title , .' /0 -- 7/ _ ev Signature / Date • • ICleeti� '•![!2•i"'E�f'"s -. .•,l. s -Y s*vg5 ,' mss,•.-Z1'- "� �}. ., 7' •}��iCez IP `3.. 1.22 alt.' •" fy � - r+, y ..t �° L may_ - 7 r• • +~ 1. rt s 1 . . t r . - ' .41 , c. .. if ,'ii,, - . ../ ci ..2 w:, 'pi ' ., .-- '.T--.- .A., ...- 7%. ue. 4 iS :I i�� , r. .s' s ! M - •a x •A •yr by-- j-. •-:,,z..-• ,i (-,-. _Ali. 4f� j � /� 19! 1'+•• -.•• . ; . °_=•"r Y y=•ri '`' t : i't i f tf w� p t y ... K 1�~ _ ..E;‘, .#! • a ,,rte, ,.' ` �..4.1.- ,• , .jt.r ? • ..�.. •q�ti ;!117. I. S_ ••._.l 1 ).- _V__ ,�, _ ,~T � .� r #' • r • } j f i t ! r,...:-f.te tar...._ it 1 2„„ of • .1.4..i _ F ' • +jpila "'z / �J� ,a;! ,ice;._°-••.t 25 ,.I i — �' 1 __ t Ai . . . . I ••••••• ._ j6-1S—"s': 11:5.'"-• • i ., 2. I• 1 3 www.co.washington.or.us/surveynet — — County Sur ors()trice This map as derived from several databases Washington County The Counn cannot accept reponsibihn for an a—•,r, _ 155 N First Ate.Suite 3511-15 omissions.or positional accuracy and theretiac:-:-:.u: I I OHhoro.OR 97124-31,72 %%%%%%co l•achim on if u no«array. •'• -roduct Ho%%e%cr.no wt.::. Prirt:1(),' - " _ • I•'' Washington County, Oregon -__ f.......,.. a-r.>sC. 4EC IVED urn f FFR 1 3 2001 UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY February 9, 2001 Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Tigard, OR 97223 Randy Hinderer 614 SW 11th Ave, Suite 401 Portland, OR 97205 Re: Development at SW Naeve Street and Highway 99W, King City, Oregon (USA file 836, Tax map 2S110DB, Tax lot 1200) The Unified Sewerage Agency (Agency) has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Agency staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following Agency review it appears that sensitive areas do not exist on-site and the sensitive area near this site would only require a 50' buffer. Since your property is beyond the 50' maximum buffer, the above referenced project does not need a Service Provider letter as required by Agency Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from the Agency or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 503-846-3613. Sincerely, /1601,(- . s_ Heidi K. Berg Site Assessment Coordinator \1MO_SERV_04\eng$\Development Svcs\SP 00-7\Concurrence Letters\2S110DB01200.doc 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270, MS 10 Phone: 503/846-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX: 503/846-3525 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE RECEIIRE)MiG N(7)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING,RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO_ City of Tigard OCT 2:2001 Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARi Tigard,OR 97223 I, -cog/lift/1i K affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed c&g c R /-ay affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) _ /cj ?'T) PA-cc p/C ,W,1 f l6 kto� , and did on the 6-m day of g E E-- 6 i� 02 013 I , 19 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a /VI I! Dt ✓? cor'ih.Ev'r application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at b �� C(^f�, /1W Y 9i9 rAc our, • — - 1 _ _ _ . _ '_a Li&I l ♦ - I„ q / (state location you posted notice on property) fr Signature (In the presence Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Joo / Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the c day of!)c ..e_ , 1-9_. OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION NO.316ARI5 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUL 20,20dt My Commission Expires: >-a 0 -.2 0 0A/ (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 'NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAMEAE-2 •/ R U�� L o'� • TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELO L ENT: • I Name of Applicant/Owner: (Q1 e�f� {f vesf /I Address or General Location of Subject Property: • �Q s _ c_( - fA r 72rC f f Irtlr- j 6_ .`<Q LSubject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): I h:Uogin\pattyvnasterslaffpost.mst AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING RECEIVED PLANNING OCT - 2 2001 STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard ) I, £BRAT//l1 k• D6Z/'ULL/ , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 3.6--p7-- _6 , cj I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 1.59TO s . cn1 p4c(,cr(' ff w f. i i c IV D a a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 77 4.A-k f � p�C ( tea i IJ T U/N o r�C f) with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a tary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2 day of ) 6 , cc/ OFFICIAL SEAL Vp , NOTARY PU UC REl NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION NO.336685 MY COMMISSION IXPIRES JUL 20,2004 My Commission Expires: 7-a o -oz Goy (Applicant,please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: /7f f-4 (T( C O I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: V S C 11 T I 'Address of Applicant/Owner: ( e f �� /?&7 tvd C L r Address or General Location of Subject Property: " Lq f T [Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): h:vogm pattylmastuslaffmail mst 9/6/01 Subject: Proposed Auto Sales & Service Facility Tax Lot 1200, 2S 1 10DB Tigard, Oregon Dear Resident, I am representing the owner of the property located to the southeast of the intersection of Highway 99 and S.W. Naeve St. in Tigard. (2s1 10db, Tax Lot 1200) The owner is proposing the construction of an auto sales and service facility at this location for development review. Please see attached vicinity map & preliminary site plan. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss this proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Friday, September 21st, 2001 Tigard First Baptist Church Room MC 205 11075 S.W. Gaarde St. Tigard, Oregon 7:00 p.m. Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at (503)226- 4200 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Randy Hinderer ,,.ii CITY CITY of TIGARD 1 / . GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM O. � SUBJECT SITE 4/4/Pi AREA NOTIFIED/5001 NEIGHBORHOOD MTG ERIN CHAP MAN/641-5102 • • • _ww 1�,i��E� 2S11DDB,01200 �► ��N T VALID FOR 3 MONTHS a ;irk;' nt�„ °; , �� . ,1TO per n ,. D s.. r:14 f2 nl �M \\\\\:\ I': ir-,:=licf ,,------..,■ ...Alum \`� n■ �V :s> t � s4 r Q °F' 3 mesa nnwam n "11"11os,nnp S'� tuRlH1 I ss,n2rnut '' p a mot eir I. o 0 0 III as* _ `utm NMI pglouL..� ° ##### 4,111111r „,_. ., , „., a p gm. Quo alma w gimp i 11011 r MS V �`� �� 0 300 100 Feet / ■` _ �, t 4'' ■+ v, ' . • • 1"=325 feet ► iIIL \_________- City of Tigard ■a ■w■� Information on this map is for general location only and ''''''.7.-..„.,,.77,,,,.. 0 ,N' . �', should be veri(ed with the Development Services Division. �� . 13gar,O Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 i (503)639-4171 Q �_ htlp:/Iwww.ei.ligard.a.us Community Development Plot date: Dec 27, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR / � / cr PARKING — 60 CARS ' SITE 0 VACATED R/W — 4,486 s.f. 11ilL 'I.,F,/.'"--. 1 � ---` `-^`- - 1 _ . . -1,‘.\ 1 ..-- ' ",-,..t ,.„ ..N:.,.ZZ------,„,\\----- , ---, - . «r 33285 SQ.'/ � ' -- ---J I--/ ` / , • - � � � /w `. � ' � ~ ` -' �-- N | ~ �n ''' -A., ro, ec vobazo,,..s 4 \ - iNs- / MOBILE / ^` | ` `.__ - N (.1.,,.- / NOTES ~/ / | `` ^ ^ \ �.~` ` __- ~` | - ' `` \ <\ `' / ~` . CURVE DATA ~^J ��N� y" i / ~ ^ I • . /- . / / *. ~ `. . @ 1 ^ \ / . •- � " o / / � ` ``/ o - . I�1► CITY OF TIOARD Community Deveropment Shaping A Better Community LAN usE PROPOSAL DEscRiptiON 120 DAYS = 3/15/2002 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2001-00011 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: DEZFULLI AUTO SALES APPLICANT: Ebrahim Dezfulli OWNER: Same 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a used automobile sales lot with an associated 350 square foot sales office. LOCATION: 15280 SW Pacific Highway; 2S110DB, Tax Lot 1200. The subject site is located on the corner of SW Naeve Street and SW Pacific Highway. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.745, CRITERIA: 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II ❑ TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: NOVEMBER 16, 2001 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: NOVEMBER 30,2001 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ❑CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 11, 2001 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP Z LANDSCAPING PLAN ❑ IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Z NARRATIVE ® GEOTECH REPORT Z OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 317 IAA-c A-II-3 Ce ■ ,,.,j PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN CItCKLIST Project: FOR Date: 1a "t-147 lc‘ LAND USE APPLICATION SUBMITTALS El COMPLETE INCOMPLETE GRADING U Existing and proposed contours shown. [• Are adjacent parcels impacted by proposed grading? ❑ Yes R- o E- Adjacent parcel grades shown. STREET ISSUES Er Right-of-way clearly shown? IDv Centerline of street clearly shown? aName of street(s) shown? p-- Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown? ,t=to\Q Profiles of proposed streets rg-4Q Future Streets Plan provided? (subdivisions and some partitions) U profiles n topo shown on adjacent property? U jai-A. Traffic study required/submitted? a Do proposed street grades comply with City standards? E1 Widths of proposed public streets shown? EKWidths of streets appropriate? Jd"��a Are private streets proposed? ] under 6 lot minimum? ❑ width appropriate? ❑Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES --- M Existing/proposed lines shown? [" Stubs to adjacent parcels required? WATER ISSUES EY Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? aExisting/proposed fire hydrants? IlY Proposed meter location and size shown? Er Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES L j Existing/proposed lines? 11,_-- Preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention provided? (- er quality and/or detention facility shown on plan? ❑ does area provided match calculations for size requirement? 0 4 ubs to adjacent properties required? Water quality and/or detention shown outside of any wetland buffer? i:leng\brianr rnasterslpublic facility plan checklist doc REVISED: 03/13/01 /Giiaolddl��uii��lllll�� 2 October 29, 2001 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal-SDR2001-00011 USED CAR SALES FACILITY Dear Mr. Dezfulli: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, Staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. The following clarifications and additional information are required before Staff can consider your application complete and begin the review: 1. Submit preliminary sizing calculation of water quality and/or detention facility. Once the required information has been submitted, Staff will deem the application complete and begin the review process. If you have any questions about the information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner i:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2001-00011.acc.doc.dot c: SDR2001-00011 Land Use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON November 15, 2001 Ebrahim Dezfulli 12587 SW 133rd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Notice of Complete Submittal USED CAR SALES FACILITY— SDR2001-00011 Dear Mr. Dezfulli: The City has received the information necessary to begin the review of your Site Development Review application. Staff has, therefore, deemed your application submittal as complete on 11/15/2001 and will begin the review process. The estimated time for rendering a decision from the date an application is deemed as complete is 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding your application or if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (503) 639-4171, x317. Sincerely, - 7— Mat ew Scheidegger Assistant Planner s\cu rp I n\m a th ew\sd r\S D R 2001-00011.a cc l.d oc.d of c: SDR2001-00011 Land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503)684-2772 saloN DNEflI4MOD lNiOI ,I,VDI'IddV ilild CITYOFTIGARO 4, PRE-APPLICATION CITY of n •` Community CONFERENCE NOTES Shaping A Better community (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL ,,(. �� REAP Nnc I r 9 m an Gr'ca ASSpG;AYE fl APPLICANT: 1 AGENT: Phone: ( ) Phone: ( ) •• • PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: Se �,��, j S -� ��,� S4 I 7?Gti TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2,�lla T�� p NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: 5 i '-� «�__ _ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: �. � ec !� se 4 i u� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN reap MAP DESIGNATION: �' �uyyr.4r--c- ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C- CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM (C.I.T.)AREA: ,S ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18. 6-2_n I MINIMUM LOT SIZE: -r sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 6-0 ft. Max. building height: - ft. Setbacks: Front ft. Side 9' ft. Rear� ft. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: is?5'i° Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 %. l NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING [Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout] THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET AND THE APPROPRIATE CIT FACILITATOR AND THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S) of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section IN NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. Ur IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ' ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.1651 Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: ---'<-' . Minimum pavement width: ai All driveways and parking areas, except f r some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: cE WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.105.0301 WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and ajo , industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial `,' complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. 1 1, SPECIAL SETBACK efer to Code Chapter 18.130) Y � STREETS: feeeerom the centerline of � • LOWER INTEN ITYES: feet, alofhe site's boundary. FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. JPSPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.8. BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least half (1/2) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ' !, BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.145) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 N0N-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: • 6-LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.705] STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. J RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. [1 PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0401 REQUIRED parking for this type of use: P'ercujc7 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. • Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3) feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: kfr All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. • BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section •4 BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.7651 BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. n SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7151 The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNStrITN3LE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WEILAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,. OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND/Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application coinferere based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive Land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWSI BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF:VEG ATED SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDORPER SSIDE5 • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% 15 feet 10 to <50 acres + >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% 10 to <50 acres 30 feet • >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine' 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary, and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. (E' SIGNS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.C.) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. et MITIGATION [Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.1] REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: • The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. y The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. n CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18395) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT (Refer to Code Section 18.797.030) The WATER RESOURCES (WR) OVERLAY DISTRICT implements the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and is intended to resolve conflicts between development and conservation of significant wetlands, streams and riparian corridors identified in the City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory. Specifically, this chapter allows reasonable economic use of property while establishing clear and objective standards to: protect significant wetlands and streams; limit development in designated riparian corridors; maintain and enhance water quality; maximize flood storage capacity; preserve native plant cover; minimize streambank erosion; maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats; and conserve scenic, recreational and educational values of water resource areas. Safe Harbor: The WR OVE LAY DISTRICT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 (Natu I Resources) and the "safe harbor" provisions of the Goal 5 administrative rule (OAR 660, Division ). These provisions require that "significant" wetlands and riparian corridors be mapped and pro cted. The Tualatin River, which is also a "fish-bearing stream," has an average annual flow of more than 1000 cfs. Major Streams: \. Streams which are mapped as "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" by the Oregon Department of Forestry and have an average annual fl less than 1000 cubic feet per second (cfs). Y Major streams in Tigard in de FANNO CREEK, ASH CREEK (EXCEPT THE NORTH FORK AND OTHER TRIBUTARY CREEKS) AND BALL CREEK. Minor Streams: Streams which are NOT "FISH-BEARING STREAMS" according to Oregon Department of Forestry maps . Minor streams in Tigard include Summer Creek, Derry Dell Creek, Red Rock Creek, North Fork of Ash Creek and certain short tributaries of the Tualatin River. Riparian Setback Area: This AREA IS MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM AND PARALLEL TO MAJOR STREAM OR TUALATIN RIVER TOP-OF-BANKS, OR THE EDGE OF AN ASSOCIATED WETLAND, whichever is greater. The riparian setback is the same as the "riparian corridor boundary" in OAR 660-23- 090(1)(d). ➢ The standard TUALATIN RIVER RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 75 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. ➢ The MAJOR STREAMS RIPARIAN SETBACK IS 50 FEET, unless modified in accordance with this chapter. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • ➢ ISOLATED WETLANDS AND MINOR STREAMS (including adjacent wetlands) have no riparian setback; however, a 25-foot "water quality buffer" is required under Cleanwater Services (CWS) standards adopted and administered by the City of Tigard. RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTIONS [Refer to Code Section 18391.1001 The DIRECTOR MAY APPROVE A SITE-SPECIFIC REDUCTION OF THE TUALATIN RIVER OR ANY MAJOR STR'EAVI RIPARIAN SETBACK BY AS MUCH AS 50% to allow the placement of structures or impervious surfaces otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that equal or better protection for identified major stream resources is ensured through streambank restoration and/or enhancement of riparian vegetation in preserved portions of the riparian setback area. Eligibility for Riparian Setback in Disturbed Areas. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A RIPARIAN SETBACK REDUCTION, the applicant must demonstrate that the riparian corridor was substantially disturbed at the time this regulation was adopted. This determination mus be based on the Vegetation Study required by Section 18.797.100 that demonstrates all of he following: Native plan species currently cover less than 80% of the on-site riparian corridor area; The tree ca py currently covers less than 50% of the on-site riparian corridor and healthy trees have not-been removed from the on-site riparian setback area for the last five years; • That vegetation was not removed contrary to the provisions of Section 18.797.100 regulating removal of native plant species; • That there will be no infringement into the 100-year floodplain; and • The average slope of the riparian area is not greater than 20%. C ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design 18.765 (Off-Street Parking/Loading Standards) Requirements) 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) Center) 18.350(Planned Development) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 18.780(Signs) V 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Tree Removal) 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.725(Environmental Performance 18.797 (Water Resources (WR) Overlay Standards) District) 18.390(Decision Making 18.730(Exceptions To Development 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) Procedures/Impact Study) Standards) 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) 18.430(Subdivisions) ' 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: >I 4 GL't.�2 _LA3Z.�-GAG I_.�AC GL-�' „2„G_ TK(G PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the i Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCLPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/2' x 11" map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal peri d follows all la_AuA4ecisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard f � C . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available/from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended thai a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffprelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: - / - - -- — --e _ CITY 0 TIG'RD PLAN I G DIVISION - TAFF PERSON •LDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503)639-4171 FAX: (503)684-7297 E-MAIL:(staffs first namel @cl.tigard.or.us TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: ci.tigard.or.us H:lpattylmasters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 18-Jan-2001 (Engineering section: preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 9 of 9 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please read this form carefully in conjunction with the notes provided to you at the pre- application conference. This checklist identifies what is required for submittal of a complete land use application. Once an application is deemed complete by Community Development staff, a decision may be issued within 6-8 weeks. If you have additional questions after reviewing all of the information provided to you, please contact the staff person named below at the City of Tigard Planning Division, (503) 639-4171. Staff: %�.- / , - — Date: 6 T , 1. BASIC INFORMATION ALL LAND USE APPLICATIONS REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: Completed Application Form with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed Written summary of proposal Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). Documentary evidence of neighborhood meeting (if required) Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filing Fee 2. PLANS REQUIRED In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION (Section 5 of this checklist provides details on what information to include on each plan): Vicinity Map 0 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map Preliminary Utilities Plan D Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map __,'®' Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Site Development Plan ❑ Architectural Drawings cam\ Landscape Plan 0 Sign Drawings e9 Public Improvements/Streets Plan 3. NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH AS YOU ARE PROPOSING THE CITY REQUIRES - ` ' COPIES OF ALL APPLICATION MATERIALS. City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 1 of 5 • 4. SPECIAL STUDIES AND REPORTS Because of the nature of your project and/or the site you propose to develop, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL STUDIES WILL BE REQUIRED. These studies must be prepared by certified professionals with experience in the appropriate field: ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Local Streets Traffic Study ❑ Wetlands/Stream Corridor Delineation and Report ❑ Habitat Area Evaluation ❑ Storm Drainage System Downstream Analysis ❑ Preliminary Sizing Calculations for Proposed Water Quality and/or Detention Facility ❑ Geotechnical Report ❑ Other 5. PREPARING PLANS AND MAPS Plans and maps should be prepared at an engineering scale (1" = 10/20/50/100/200') and include a north arrow, legend and date. The same scale should be used for all your plans. Where possible the City prefers the use of a scale that allows a site plan or subdivision plat to be shown on a single sheet. Architectural drawings may be prepared at an architectural scale. One copy of each plan must be submitted in photo-ready 81/2 x 11 format. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR EACH TYPE OF PLAN (If the plans you submit do not include all of the information requested because you feel it is not applicable, please indicate this and provide a brief explanation). Vicinity Map Showing the location of the site in relation to: • Adjacent properties ❑ • Surrounding street system including nearby intersections • Pedestrian ways and bikeways ❑ • Transit stops ❑ • Utility access ❑ Existing Conditions Map Parcel boundaries, dimensions and gross area ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for 0-10% slopes or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ • Drainage patterns and courses on the site and on adjacent lands ❑ • Potential natural hazard areas including: • Floodplain areas ❑ • Areas having a high seasonal water table within 24"of the surface for three or more weeks of the year ❑ • Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ • Unstable ground ❑ • Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ • Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ • Locations of resource areas including: • Wildlife habitat areas identified in the Comprehensive Plan ❑ • Wetlands ❑ Other site features: • Rock outcroppings ❑ • Trees with >_6" caliper measured 4' from ground level Li Location and type of noise sources ❑ Locations of existing structures and their uses ❑ =a Locations of existing utilities and easements ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 2 of 5 Locations of existing dedicated right-of-ways ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map The proposed name of the subdivision ❑ Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer surveyor and designer(as applicable) ❑ Scale, north arrow and date ❑ Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided Names of adjacent subdivisions or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un-subdivided land ❑ Contour lines related to a City-established benchmark at 2' intervals for 0-10% grades and 5' intervals for grades greater than 10% ❑ The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): • Public and private right-of-ways and easements ❑ ♦ Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ ♦ Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ • Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ ♦ Watercourses U ♦ Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ • The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level ❑ ♦ The location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ Supplemental information including: ♦ Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ ♦ A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands and marsh areas The proposed lot configurations, lot sizes and dimensions, and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots n If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application materials ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan The owner of the subject parcel ❑ The owner's authorized agent ❑ The map scale, north arrow and date ❑ Proposed property lines ❑ Description of parcel location and boundaries ❑ Contour lines (2' intervals for slopes 0-10% or 5'for slopes >10%) ❑ Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25' of all property lines ❑ Location and width of all water courses ❑ Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4' above ground level ❑ All slopes greater than 25% ❑ Location of existing and proposed utilities and utility easements ❑ Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ Future street extension plan showing existing and potential street connections ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 3 of 5 Site Development Plan The proposed site and surrounding properties ❑ Contour line intervals ❑ The locations, dimensions and proposed names of the following: • Existing and platted streets and other public ways ❑ • Easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ • Proposed streets or other public ways and easements on the site ❑ • Alternative routes of dead-end or proposed streets that require future extensions ❑ The locations and dimensions of the following: • Entrances and exits on the site ❑ • Parking and circulation areas ❑ • Loading and service areas ❑ • Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ • Outdoor common areas ❑ ♦ Above ground utilities ❑ • Trash and recyclable material areas ❑ The locations, dimensions and setback distances of the following: • Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25' of the site ❑ • Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site ❑ • Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ • Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ • Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ Locations and type(s)of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ The locations of the following: • All areas to be landscaped ❑ ♦ Mailboxes ❑ • Structures and their orientation ❑ Landscape Plan Location of trees to be removed ❑ Location, size and species of existing plant materials ❑ General location, size and species of proposed plan materials ❑ Landscape narrative that addresses: • Soil conditions and how plant selections were derived for them ❑ • Plans for soil treatment such as stockpiling the top soil ❑ ♦ Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ Location and description of the irrigation system where applicable ❑ Location and size of fences, buffer areas and screening ❑ Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ Public Improvements/Streets Plan Proposed right-of-way locations and widths ❑ A scaled cross-section of all proposed streets plus any reserve strips ❑ Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 4 of 5 • . Grading/Erosion Control Plan The locations and extent to which grading will take place ❑ Existing and proposed contour lines ❑ —> Slope ratios ❑ Utilities Plan Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the locations of valves and fire hydrants ❑ Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ Location, width and direction of flow of all water courses and drainageways ❑ Location and estimated size of proposed storm drainage lines ❑ Where applicable, location and estimated size and dimensions of proposed water quality/detention facility ❑ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees ❑ Program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal (Section 18.790.030) LJ A protection program defining standards and methods to be used during and after construction ❑ Architectural Drawings Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures and their proposed use ❑ Elevation drawings for each elevation of the structure ❑ Sign Drawings _> Specify proposed location, size and height ❑ i:\;curpin\masters\revised\checklist.doc 5-Jun-00 City of Tigard Land Use Application Checklist Page 5 of 5 P 4PPLI ATION CONFERENCE NOTES community ENGINEERING EON" Clq rd on Development Shaping A Hotter Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Meats): 2511066 Tax Lot(s): 1200 Use Type: -Parking/el The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Naeve Street to 25 feet from centerline (local street west of SW Royalty Parkway) SW to ?'D feet RAID t�s Cbl'- � p(�'{ � sb � s , I I SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: ® 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW Naeve Street, to include: ® 16 feet of pavement from centerline to curb ® concrete curb ® storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to curb to match existing. ® street trees behind sidewalk, spaced per TDC standards. ® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page l of 6 Engineering Department Section Other: X Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Royalty Parkway, to include: ❑ feet of pavement 1 1 concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities ® 5-foot concrete sidewalk behind curb to match existing. • street trees behind sidewalk, spaced per TDC standards. I street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: ® 1/2 street improvements will be necessary along SW Pacific Highway (if ODOT requires), to include: feet of pavement concrete curb n storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ® Other: Applicant must coordinate with ODOT to determine what they may require for frontage improvements. I I street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement concrete curb 1 storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk n street trees street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: I 1 feet of pavement concrete curb CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Engineering Department Section storm sewers any ier underground utilities I -foot concrete sidewalk [ I street trees n street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district. The following street improvements may be eligible for such an agreement: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side.of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Naeve Street. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in-lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located in SW Naeve Street, at SW Royalty Parkway. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer westerly in SW Naeve Street as needed to serve the site (if service is needed). Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Tualatin Valley Fire and Rc le District (South Division) [Conte Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Onsite detention is required. Submit preliminary sizing calculations with the land use application. There is an existing public storm line in SW Naeve Street adjacent to the site. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: Construction of an on-site water quality facility. [ I Payment of the fee in-lieu. Other Comments: All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. Contact Matt Larsen, ODOT Region 1, at (503) 731-4610, with regard to what ODOT may require along the frontage of SW Pacific Highway. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section In 1990, Washington Count iopted a county-wide Traffic Impa -ee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic ' Impact Fee program collects fees from new development basea on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. If no buildings will be constructed, then no TIF will be required. PERMITS Engineering Department Permits: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a permit from the Engineering Department. There are two types of permits issued by Engineering, as follows: Street Opening Permit (SOP). This permit covers relatively minor work in a public right-of-way or easement, such as sidewalk and driveway installation or repair, and service connections to main utility lines. This work may involve open trench work within the street. The permittee must submit a plan of the proposed work for review and approval. This type of permit requires a non-refundable $150.00 fee. In certain cases, where City costs may exceed the $150.00 fee, an administrative deposit will be required. In addition, the permittee will be required to post a bond or similar financial security for the work. Compliance Agreement (CAP). This permit covers more extensive work such as main utility line extensions, street improvements, etc. In subdivisions, this type of permit also covers all grading and private utility work. Plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. This type of permit requires a deposit to be submitted with the construction plans. The amount of the deposit depends upon the overall value of the public improvements. The City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security, and execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. Prior to City acceptance of any permitted work, and prior to release of work assurance bond(s), the work shall be deemed complete and satisfactory by the City in writing. The permittee is responsible for the work until such time written City acceptance of the work is posted. NOTE: If an Engineering Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 016 Engineering Department Section Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: p 0 1 EN EERING DEPA'TMENT ST FF Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: [503)684-7297 i.\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng dot CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department Section PRE-APPLICATION 0-4 CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION 1, r FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: Address: /258 Si-t/ f Phone(5O3)624--5433 Case No.: °10 a( -pv O b 2. City: -777 C'. Zip: .97Z-L3 Receipt No.: ?-4--)" n Application Accepted By: fCT7 Contact Person: Phone: Date: 8(2.,`f i O / Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): u DATE OF PRE-APP.: y/© uu TIME OF PRE-APP.: 9 Address: / 52-$a e P`<< -C Phorfe: PRE-APP. HELD WITH: City: I/1641 64 Zip: ? 7 Z Z y Rev.12/6/2000 i:lcurpinlmasters\revised\Pre-App Request.doc Property Address/Location(s): S. C'r. S.w• S4. S. co. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): 2S< IODS 7Z. 1200 D.- Pre-Application Conf. Request Form 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: O. 7‘,„ ,Qc ❑ Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION any site-specific questions/issues that RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a ❑ Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn the subject jest property show the location of the subject property in relation to the prepare for the meeting. nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the subject property and A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 across the street. weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are ❑ The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of ❑ Topographic Information. Include 9:00-11:00 AM. Contour Lines if Possible. ❑ If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN MONOPOLE project, the applicant must PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM attach a copy of the letter and proof in 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. the form of an affidavit of mailing, that the collocation protocol was completed IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE Community Development Code). INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ❑ Filing Fee $240.00 ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. --re Sys" Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) September 2001 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Tuesday, September 04, 2001 ,30 8:00 8:30 9:00 PNre-app Abe Dezfulli 503.524.5433 15280 SW Pacific Y 9:30 10:00 Pre-app appt 10:30 11:00 Pre-app 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 3:26PM Friday,August 24, 2001 r GRAPHIC SCALE ° 1 . .. It MN IN ■ ■IIIIIIIIII • IN MN - ( Ir raar) II Iao6- 30 R i / PARKING - 60 CARS 1 ° SITE AREA (LESS VACATED RA) - 33.285 e.f. I 1 VACATED R/W - 4.486 ..f. v /I �'•-... - e, •w., LANDSCAPE AREA - 8,654 a.f. .-.• '. '' IMPERVIOUS AREA °' ��M1 (AC PAVING) - 28,117 •.'. i !t'fi n LPL .� a i\ ��` ti \l\. y` ` 5 \• '1 .; - -fJ , ,/�1 l �/! ? , :::--\:‘,4 r` L•"mac `=='- - 00/ ,/ a 33285 SO. �►. `-- �. N.4Eyp '��jll iC r 0.78 AC. ' _ -_ >- 1' �` QIL/rA�ER SEPAR�I� \ / Z f . 'ot, 111 •", 1101 It/ \:'..... \\-\\:**** .... ...- ....."''''''' 0 p5 i \ � ' R1 7 NOTES __ . ' THIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DOES NOT 3 r ., '"`` \ CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY. - y ELEVAiON DATUM PROM CITY CF TIGARD - ..-3^,.. SURVEY CONTROL POINT 236, BRONZE DISK, '�.,,� ` LOCATED IN S.E. CURB A�CORNER OF S.W.NAEVE ST. AND S.W. 109TH AVENUE . �__ �� Ls."-., .� \ 4 `i I CURVE DATA ....., ...5<Q� • I \ �`` - \ ..... \ boy \ \ � . ° , \ l i ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ■ 3/25/02 Conditions As ,ciated with Case #: SDR20(t 10011 Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 STREET TREE SPACING 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 1. Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. 0001 LANDSCAPING PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 2. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one(1)for every 7-spaces. 0001 LETTER FRM REFUSE HAULER 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 3. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 0001 REFUSE CONTAIN'R AREA PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 4. Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence,wall or hedge at least six(6) feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. 0001 CUSTOMER PARKING PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 5. Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office.All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. 0001 TRAFFIC ARROW PLANS 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 6. Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. 0001 PRKG WHEEL STOP PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 7. Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. 0001 ACCESS AISLE PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 8. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access aisles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic,or allowing access from more than one driveway.All drive aisles must be maintained free of parked cars. 0001 BICYCLE PRKG PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 9. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 0001 BICYCLE RACK PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 10. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.0.of the Tigard Development Code. 0001 PRKG STALL PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 11. Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. 0001 ARBORIST TREE PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 12. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. 0001 LIGHT/WINDOWS/POA PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 13.Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. 0001 PUB IMPRV PERMIT& PLANS 0 Not Met BDR 1/10/02 BLW 14. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the street improvement work in SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway and any other work in the public right-of-way.Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE:these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/$ASSURANCE INFO REQD 0 Not Met BDR 1/10/02 BLW 15.As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Page 1 of 3 8/30/02 Conditions A Jciated with Case #: SDR2( •00011 11:13:24 A1/1 Cond. Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By 0001 STREET TREE SPACING 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 1. Provide a plan showing all street trees to be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart. 0001 LANDSCAPING PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 2. Provide a plan showing the parking facility to be landscaped with a combination of low-lying and vertical shrubbery and parking lot trees within landscaped islands on a basis of one(1)for every 7-spaces. 0001 LETTER FRM REFUSE HAULER 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 3. Provide a sign-off letter from the franchise hauler regarding the refuse facility compatibility. 0001 REFUSE CONTAIN'R AREA PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 4. Provide a plan showing the refuse container area enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence,wall or hedge at least six(6)feet in height. Gate openings must be provided at a 10-foot-wide minimum and shall be capable of being secure in a closed and open position. 0001 CUSTOMER PARKING PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 5. Provide a plan showing at least 4 customer parking stalls within 200 feet of the proposed sales office.All customer spaces shall be labeled as customer parking. 0001 TRAFFIC ARROW PLANS 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 6. Provide a plan that shows on-site traffic flow in the form of painted directional arrows. 0001 PRKG WHEEL STOP PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 7. Provide a plan showing all parking stalls along the boundaries of the parking lot to have wheel stops. 0001 ACCESS AISLE PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 8. Submit a plan showing 24-foot-wide access aisles if on-site traffic flow is accommodating two-direction traffic,or allowing access from more than one driveway.All drive aisles must be maintained free of parked cars. 0001 BICYCLE PRKG PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 9. Submit a plan showing the bicycle parking structure to include no less than 2-bicycle parking stalls. 0001 BICYCLE RACK PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 10. Provide a plan that shows the bicycle rack designed according to Section 18.765.050.C.of the Tigard Development Code. 0001 PRKG STALL PLAN 0 Met MAS 3/25/02 MAS 11.Submit a plan indicating which parking stalls will be used to meet the required parking standard. 0001 ARBORIST TREE PLAN 0 Met MAS 8/30/02 MAS 12. Provide a tree removal, protection and mitigation plan for the site prepared by a certified arborist. 0001 LIGHT/WINDOWS/POA PLAN 0 Not Met MAS 1/10/02 BLW 13. Submit a plan showing parking lot lighting and an elevation of the proposed sales office that shows windows and point of access. 0001 PUB IMPRV PERMIT&PLANS 0 Not Met BDR 1/10/02 BLW 14. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project to cover the street improvement work in SW Naeve Street and SW Royalty Parkway and any other work in the public right-of-way.Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 0018 COMP AGRMNT/3 ASSURANCE INFO READ 0 Not Met BDR 1/10/02 BLW 15.As a part of the public improvement plan submittal,the Engineering Department shall be provided with the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement(if one is required)and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Page 1 of 3 08/27/2002 01: 53 -5245433 DEZFULLI E PAGE 01 " ") r • Abe. •f • 1' •1 ' . . . • . . . . • . . ,H ALSTEADS . • ARBORICULTURE : . -spr-,,,,•,-,:i.o.,,, „,.the,,,,,and , - • f1416,,V4rtiOr)Of ttees" ', CONSULTANTS . . .... . . . . . .. . , ,•.;a:tsci,7?...V.f.trokr. (..'4•Lvaitani: 8.4 . . . . . • . 4 . . PNi)144 1.90.4-0714.•4)Iscitoker); . . • . ' . . . • 174.4:. (•!tc i;4 82:■1144141klin C,i'k 87f*? ' . • • .. 0 ' 4 . ist$i;;14:4'.643 .- .. . : • • .. . . , : , . • . 4 ,4 •. . . . •. . . • . . . • ,. .. :...., . . .. , .•.7, . . . . . • • . • , . •• : Febr-aar*.20. 4002 • - . . • , ::: • . . ; • • • • . . . •Mr.:AbeVeztiult, ' 5 SW 133' Avenue • ad OR ..,: • rh 50 .424..5433 FX 503y812.A898. :.•If. •' , . i • ,. Referen0e; Tr...Assessment for Proposed Development .1 ...,.....0 . . ; ., , . , 1" - .LoCattort.: Sti).itn Side Naeve Street at the Intersection of HWY 99W, .,... .. Ileard,.Oregori .: je ' , ' •• ' Subject' .Tree Survey/Mftigation Report ,. .4' -Tt , . -.. :,.,:. .. .. With yottfalaPPOvel, I have inspected the site. sitepl-an 'Highway 5) ,Aetrzt Resale . • .eret the titoesfor the proposed project located on the south side of iSieeveStreet .cj- . . eii4:0 Inigot300-iori of HWY 99W, Ttgarcl, Oregon. The purpose of thzeiftspajction ‘0,10to i 1-47 •' was to identify:and evaluate the presentation potential of ail trees twelve inches .• ..'• . • it trio.*dierrisiter (measured at four feet above ground)and larger under-the ... .. •.fonhcointeg construction in accordance with the City 0'Tigard's Tree:Ordinance , . .0,•. Chapter 18.140, .,.J..... . :. have tagge4 arid numbered all trees, both in the fieid and in this rept*that will be affected by,o0nstruction development using 601 through (i18 seA41000for. .•eies* identification. The first numbered tree starts in the southeast.Ornef-df:the. ...property. ::!,.. . 'A•: ... :;..!.. :TRE ''-' A4e3littitiL/T, here are a We of seventeen trees boated totally within protect boundaries and one major trait located 20 percent within project boundaries . I.. There are.six trees less than twelve inches in trunk diameter meaSurecteltfour.• ; 1 feet.above:ground and are nut required to be part of the City of Tigard4'It ee Mitigation ideatifidation Program , • Those trees etWras follows'.604, 605, 607, 612 and 6q7, • . ; , ••.:.; il _ . •. • i his,keilviSS a laaidual of tegye trees,within project boundadas thet itro4wit.)ve: , I U : inches in trunk diameter and larger that are required tp be part of thief•Cy of , .111 • tigard s"TreetArtigetionirdentification Program." Five of these treeSile . > .• haviiroous, •tbrOulO be removed, and*II not be mitigated. ' . • • . , • . • .:Erman: hacaspiritN:o 6:)ri www.spiritorle.com, c.......‘to()Ow ZO 30Vd 3 i11ndz3a EEPSVZG- ES:TO ZOOZ/LZ/80 4' .•r ♦ • . • . . ':•• •. . : . . ' ,...f::: { ••..; r.. Reference:Y ee:ABsessment for P1o.p*ed.IoY ttent 'F ., Lam; .'ut Side Weave St rdOrd . . < ..�;•: 1 s rvit ti tgatlon Rem. • ;'>1 i!,.. c • .(• Of •'remai/yn seven trees that are o ese^Y bi�, on tree j within. attlaspe i botaxtehes 9ridler*toot survive construction trauma and well nee#to be :' • m liner the City of Tigsrd's Nation Plan. The other six tte e-are beiN :1 preserved user the forthcoming construction. -s Wa 4 ws: •. ?ree.nto' eli k: 606 6O9 611, 613 ern 614. .: i • . tt is not unu*u t to find,this many hazardous trees on a part-ally p r4 ate .i such a Otis, of these trees are growing in an overcrowded Mu on end c. . have raver tact stay formal care. Most of the hazards come fawn silv*ree decay • ' bark inciasione, end multiple trunks formed from breakage messed by er stor'me or repeated topping for power lines. I i,_ ,, '_ !i. t::..1. J. - . •n: ,:#t.►_.''., I, Lc: MI r.: move ,• 1 Ems.hart ibetil . only 'free numbers 601. 602., 803,610, 61ti and 618. A t#P. esyeble.Tree Retatinage • 90%(718°1 0) 'iRsitainstge till.S.percent or greater of existing trees over 12 incheain cagier . taqiiiiresno mitq %on" according to City Ordtrtance 18.180 W5-7,4, • £0 39Vd 3 irnniz3a ££17517Z5- £S :TO ZOO /L2/80 . . . • • , . • . . . • . . •• • . . . • . • • • ' • • . . • • • . . • • ' • • * • • . . . . , • . . . ' . . . . , . • . • • . . , • . Po Oti 3 ' . . •. • Fuettvuorsi 20,,2002 Refenonpe -f,rtie.,Asseserrient for•Proposed DevelopMere i..:ocatioe'. 4'isioth Side Naeve.Street at the leteriection.c svor lwow, ..... :. .. .:•: 'roted; 'prawn : . '. •• • • , • .. .i .sutiiiief,. Trite teitimeriMitigation RePOrt : ..: — • . • 1 .• . . . .• .4,,;.. Asift41 there•it one tree, a Redwood tree, numbered 618, thetts:4ePte 00ex of t he noel/Oast p:ener of the neighboring property end over laps on 10 the .ProPose0'cieyeloPrnent:project by approximately 20 percent;This trao.is the , .. • . finest apett., letaikhreet and structurally stabliest tree on Or near tiSeptittie . • i Although there is si proposed driveway within this area and the afersiethet . • .1 •r; narrOteett pogioh of the project there 4s ample room for both prOvidOlglhe tree . •; receiveeprofeasiortal arbonoutture care. . • .,,, ...4 ••.. *. • he reetilirSng preserved trees will also Survive the ferthOoming dOriekvdtiOrt ..• •;z:j, ...'; "eaurrilearoviding their root zones are not overly disturbed and the Pete..eare and ...., preservation guidelines listed below are followed. .:i. . ..., .. . ...., Img,.getabarsLPAmottignalis sltim . . ... . -... • 1. .. ... : ••.1 Betts*ooristaidtion begins. preserved tree(s) root zone(s) wilt peed 01* 4 ratted by Ore Installation of orange colored Tree Protection Fending out to the : .... •4inglipir.dripliftiecif preserved tree(3). Fencing needs to be sittached40:1-ifoot tall stool farce poats placed eight feet apart on centre kerning a prtitedtheklitle: • around:the preserved trees and fence posts need to be seCureivianehered iro...* ..:i soil to*4000,:qf fro test. A small diameter cable arrigorrieaVY*i'irt 09410:*-• " . . • ••:...:li • •'..:.*: • • " , 'weaved and ~through the protective fencing hvo feet above greterd to . .. ' •-1 ••••.1 • . stiotit*the feineirig the fencing. as described Writ need to be mainted" ..; .•throurpout the erairety of the project • 1 •., . . ,. . ..4. . . .. ....... .. ... . afore any wed( is.clone within the protected area andior if the fenorinteeerfis10; • • ...,4 ._ . .., be adjuatiettl due to hardacape construction, it will first require the approval of ; • -: • -..i ... • . • ..eonsieltingereorist and then be supervised on-site .4 S.tructunitt and deadwood tree pruning will also need to be cornplettlit riutitig .1. •-.„ con scion sae prepanitionIsite clearing in order to Take these trete&issos for . . .: •-•.; , toxouncting persons and property. The arboricurture technicienviAlOtfia-mthiri • . . ...,-,i ... eta freseekrAll also need to inspect the trams ery carefully to Make sure that .4 presereree trees are well prepared for the forthcomin ucsop, • • •• ..1. • . •I •.., • • 1 •.i. .4 • ., . • ....1 re 39Vd 3 IiinAza EEI,SOZS- ES :TO CJOZ/LZ/88 • . S. r: . • • . ` �"2OC R recacoe V:Assessment for Proposed L>eveloprnent : i 1.o for•; Sai,lth Side Nave Street at the intern et HWY.$81 ;`' 7' „.. • Subbed '1 it e► ,trveyI ltf9 rn Rspott ,s . . "'er .el i 7. _.1;h -_ continued . . , ,After prolect lompletion, therapeutic fertilization will I n ry fur,* . • ..weeerved be/Si to help.stimuiate new root growth route • . •• :.conetr n replenish any loss of soil nutrients tot optimist t tree •h. Hazardotais tniia removal within project boundaries needs to be otewripleted in e crateful resnnet a s'to not,ds mape any;preserved trees. Arty tree. *.ti g un p'nittioved within 15 feet of a.presefved tree needs to have th f rd ti MOW than excavated to r&dute overall root trauma. ' .• . It i can bee.ot•f*ettt8r assistance and/or if more technical Into rr jR' esdsd, . • :.ptease.+t ntar me immediately. • • ._ j Z. Vi. k. 4 . i:.. •DDovt P4*te d BS, CA . . +�; • , • S0 30tid 3 Ii-n3Z3a EEbSbZS- ES :iO Z00Z/LZ/80